Slashdot Mirror


120 Gigabit Pipe To Oz Begins Operation

dustpuppy writes: "The new Southern Cross Cable Network connecting Australia to the US is now operational. Featuring 120 Gigabit capacity and with a latency of 70 msec, the new trans-Pacific cable is 120 times the capacity of the existing Australasia/North America connection. Now us poor Aussies can download our mp3s that much faster! You can read more about it here." Interesting, too, how it's constructed. From the article: "The network consisted of two separate cables configured in three self-healing rings, with all three rings to be completed early next year. The duplicate-ring construction gave the network greater redundancy - if one side of the network was damaged or became inoperable, traffic could be transferred to the other side instantly." Neat.

236 comments

  1. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by vividan · · Score: 1

    Good idea ... works for about 10 years ... then what?

    I don't know about the rest of the stuff, but if I were the one designing it, I would have made it so that you could easly string newer faster/better cables so you wouldn't have to re-dig everything.

    Chris C.

    --
    I wasn't lost... I was only momentaraly confused of my spacial orientation relative to my prime destination.
  2. Thankfully NZ is linked up as well by ajmitch · · Score: 1

    It's been pretty slow here in NZ for the last few months, hopefully this'll speed things up a bit.

    1. Re:Thankfully NZ is linked up as well by jameslore · · Score: 2

      It can't get any slower...

    2. Re:Thankfully NZ is linked up as well by kiwigirl · · Score: 1

      As a kiwi, now living in Canada, I can fully appreciate that this has been along time coming. Things are pretty slow in NZ for sure, and its about time some sort of high speed access became available. In the meantime, check out this site for some great online fun. Does Humour Belong in Technology?

      --
      Kiwigirl
  3. 2.5 Terabit/s cable planned, Singapore to India by Firehawk · · Score: 1

    when completed, it will (temporarily) be the largest capacity undersea cable in the world.

    http://www.businessworldindia.com/archive/200911 /mktg2.htm

    skip to near the bottom for:

    For the industry, such differing forecasts may cause a lot of problems. For example, C. Sivasankaran's Sterling group is planning a Rs 900-crore project to set up an undersea optic fibre cable link between Chennai and Singapore with a 2.5 terabit per second capacity (1 terabit equals 1,000 gbps), while Sunil Mittal's Bharti Enterprises has tied up with Singapore Telecom (SingTel) for another sub-sea cable with 2.5 terabit capacity. BPL is also considering joining hands with other telecom companies to set up a sub-sea cable link.
  4. Re:Whose next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No plans for Asia? check www.360.net BIG PLANS!

  5. Re:Plate tectonics by Trinition · · Score: 1

    Hey, I was trying tom be funny, not informative or insightful! Don't blame me!

  6. Re:70 ms latency by arty3 · · Score: 1

    Except that signals don't travel at the speed of light. It's about 2.3*10^8 m/s in cable and 2.0*10^8 in fiber.

  7. Where have I seen this...? by bjorky · · Score: 1

    Isn't there any concern that an incredibly fake looking great white shark might bite through this and explode...?

    No, wait, that was Jaws 2.

    -----

    --

    "Defenestration" is to throw out of a window; what's a word for throwing 'Windows' out of something?
  8. In Sydney terms.... (Was: Re:Silly map) by B747SP · · Score: 1
    In global terms, the two places aren't very far apart. In Sydney terms, they're like inner-north-east and inner-south-east of greater Sydney. Both are well disconnected from the city, and you have to cross the harbour (ie: The Bridge(tm)) of equivalent to travel between the two. You could drive a car between the two in about 45mins on a weekend, and an 75mins on a weekday.

    Both locations are light-industrial with a small population of IT type stuff.

    The interesting thing about it is that both Alexandria and Brookvale are about 10Km inland from the sea. I haven't figured that bit out yet...

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  9. Re:70 ms latency by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    I rememeber a long time ago (late 80s) reading a writeup of the Morris Internet Work attack. At that point, I had no idea what Unix really was, or TCP/IP. I just remember the paper talking about an attack coming on in port something and sending a packet back to port something else.

    I had this visual of this computer with somesort of interface that had x number of physical ports on it...kinda like a LOT of serial ports or something just sitting there.

    Odd.

  10. I can get to .au but not to a lot of the US by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    Interesting timing for this. For some reason, I can get to .au sites no problem, but cannot get to cnn.com or google.com. So Australia goes high-bandwidth, and half of America drops off the net.

  11. Re:meter distance by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

    Thats the old measure. The number is so odd because they wanted to maintain backwards compatibility.

  12. Great, now the Spammer's Paradise gets faster. by gfecyk · · Score: 1

    Just what the world needed, a group of nations in the South Pacific with more bandwidth for sending spam. Anyone ever see Telstra's toothless AUP?

    spamparadise.mp3 (Mirror this please, don't kill my ISP)

    --
    Use Evolution instead of Outlook? Bewa
  13. Re:New Zealand has the WWW-IntErnet too! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
    And they are all aussie citizens mate.
    Actually, other than Crowe (who has lived in Australia since he was about 6) the others (like Sam Neil, Anna Paquin, Crowded House, etc) probably don't seeing as the only reason to get Australian citizenship (if you're a Kiwi) is to vote. Conversely if you are an Australian citizen you have to vote.
  14. Southern Cross? by Illserve · · Score: 1

    You know a robotech geek came up with that name.

    1. Re:Southern Cross? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      why, was he an astronomer?
      .oO0Oo.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Southern Cross? by Alioth · · Score: 2
      I doubt it. It was just a marketing department who was using a well-known S.hemisphere image.

      The Southern Cross is a well-known constellation in the southern hemisphere - as well known as the Plough/Big Dipper is in the northern hemisphere.

      In fact, Australia's flag has the Southern Cross constellation on it, just like Alaska's flag has the Plough/Big Dipper (Ursa major).

  15. Australian sport fishing television by corvi42 · · Score: 1


    "Today on Sport Fishing Television we see the amazing catch of a truly monster Great White Shark, and you'll be truly amazed what we find when we split open its belly - 30 thousand kilometers of fiber optic cable - What a monster!"
    </ACCENT>

    --

    There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
  16. AOL by jjr · · Score: 1

    In Austrailia is most likely that single customer the is hook up to the pipe.

    1. Re:AOL by netwerk · · Score: 1

      English motherfucker!!!! DO YOU SPEAK IT?

  17. Re:Yet more proof that the Internet is American... by corvi42 · · Score: 1

    Naturally this is true, because currently the only telcos. laying out high bandwidth lines are american ones - why? because the vast majority of internet content is located in the US & Canada, and that's what people want to access.

    There really aren't many South Korean websites that constitute a demand for direct Japan-SK. connections. Europe is currently at the stage of internet development that N.A. was in say '97, '98, hell they still have internet cafes. Once the local content goes up, local telcos. will start building extra-N.A. network infrastructure.

    --

    There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
  18. netrek by danny · · Score: 1
    I can remember playing netrek on US servers in the early 90s. The best latency we ever got was around 200ms to West Coast servers - that was when the first fiber came online, but before there was enough use to saturate it. Now I get around 300ms to vangogh.berkeley.edu (that and andrew.cmu.edu are the machines I still use for overseas connectivity testing - vangogh was one of the famous machines from the Berkeley CSRG, while CMU hosted bronco, then the world's leading netrek server).

    We used to joke about netrek being a network testing tool - it was one of the first real-time multiplayer Net games.

    Those were the days (even if Australia did get thrashed by CMU playing with 750ms satellite lag on an Australian server).

    Danny (ICMP Redirect).

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  19. Re:Not Just bloody OZ either by andrewb · · Score: 1
    "remember we won the AMERICAS CUP twice"
    You can win it as many times as you want bro, just remember - we won it first. ;)

    --

    --

    --
    We apologise for the inconvenience.

  20. Re:Filter speeds by Goonie · · Score: 2
    There is no "filter server" sitting at the network choke points. The censorship authority has issued a few "takedown notices" for material to be removed from Australian servers (the material inevitably bobbing up on US servers a few milliseconds later), but net free speech continues on totally unaffected.

    Basically, the government is *totally* uninterested in censoring the net - it just likes the legislation so it can point to it and convince the wowsers that it is doing something to protect the Children. While I dislike this kind of thing, I would prefer a situation of bad legislation being ignored to bad legislation wreaking havoc by enforcing it.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  21. Re:70 msec? by TheLink · · Score: 3
    The speed of life is a bitch, ain't it?
    Yeah, and before you know it you're dead, face down on your keyboard, submitting "Last Post" to Slashdot. :)

    Have fun!

    Link.

    --
  22. Re:Dont forget New Zealand!! by netwerk · · Score: 1

    Care Factor "ZERO"

  23. 70ms, i could do better! by state*less · · Score: 2

    I propose diggin a big hole to australlia. We could cut latency to 50ms or so.

    Time is Change.

    1. Re:70ms, i could do better! by eudas · · Score: 1

      at least until magmatism or seafloor/subterranean earthquakes kick in...

      eudas

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
  24. Re:Jesus Christ by netwerk · · Score: 1

    some of the first Modems were developed in Perth, Western Australia

    grow a brain ass hole

  25. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2

    exactly what I was getting at ... this really doesn't make much sense except for the "now"

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  26. Re:Jesus Christ by netwerk · · Score: 1

    also i remember seeing recently on the News that something like over 40% of australians use the internet (i cant remember the exact figuire so correct me if im wrong)

    get a clue

  27. Re:Where the hell are the Zentraedi? by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    The southern cross is a constellation seen in the southern hemisphere!

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  28. Re:That's 3000 mp3s per second. by Johnny+Starrock · · Score: 4

    Yes, but how big are these mp3s? Are these punk mp3s? Leonard Cohen mp3s? =)

    But then it's like most (usually lying) women say: "it doesn't matter how big the mp3 is, only how long you can maintain your connection."

    --

    end communication
  29. Re:Poor Ausies by netwerk · · Score: 1

    not completely true,

    ever heard of Project Echelon? collaboration between US and australia for monitoring phone conversations, internet traffic etc.. for terrorist activity

    email me if you're interested and ill give u some URL's

  30. Official Site + general latency by quarrel · · Score: 4
    The official site for this is www.southerncrosscables.com.

    While I'm here, someone mentioned that 70ms is pretty slow for this type of connection - which amazes me, because it blew me away that they could get it that low. (remember, we're talking 1 direction latency here - not ping times, which would atleast be double)

    A quick calculation:

    A quick check of the net tells me that the distance from Sydney (where the cable is landed in .au) to Los Angeles is 7487 miles (according to a travel agent flight distance site - who knows?), or about 11979km. (pretty similar to the diameter of the earth, which is 12742km)

    The speed of light is roughly 299,792,458 m/s so, the best (according to current physics :/) time we can do is about:

    39.957 milliseconds

    Just at the speed of light we lose almost 40ms, then they've gotta switch it at several points along the way, and while optical switches EXIST, it seems unlikely they're doing optical switching yet.

    All in all I reckon the 70ms figure is AMAZING..

    1. Re:Official Site + general latency by efuseekay · · Score: 3

      It's probably more amazing when you realize that :

      (a) light travels slower in glass (fibre optics)
      (b) it does not travel straight, but bounces off the edges of the fibre optics line.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    2. Re:Official Site + general latency by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
      The official site for this is www.southerncrosscables.com.

      I like the play on words in the opening flash, "Welcome to the Twenty Fast Century" ... now say it with your best "Knify-Spoony" accent.

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:Official Site + general latency by efuseekay · · Score: 2

      Well, in single mode fibres, light still bounces off the edges. (To be precise, in graded-index fibre optics, the light does not "bounces" but nicely do a sine wave through). So, it does not travel straight.

      The different between single and multi mode fibre is the "mode". A mode basically means a frequency of light, so in single mode fibres we use monochromatic light ( I think it's 1550nm).

      Most longhaul fibre optics are single mode, because the attenuation is much less (think multimode fibres not as optimized : losses as you described in your post). In single mode fibres, the losses are generally due to the fact that geometrical optics is just an approximation of the true nature of light.

      I wasted a year of my life designing fibre optic networks. At least now I can show off my "knowledge" in /., so it's not a total waste.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    4. Re:Official Site + general latency by jCaT · · Score: 2

      Actually, in this case the light DOES travel straight. Multimode fibers bounce light at different frequencies off the edges of the fiber to achieve higher bandwidth. The tradeoff there is that even though you're using total internal reflection- the world's best mirror- some of the light escapes every time it is reflected. In contrast to that, single mode fibers are much smaller, and the light bounces off the sides of the fiber much less. The end result is that a single-mode fiber will support much longer distances. I seem to recall that standard single mode fiber supports distances up to 10km, but that may be different for more recent fibers. They will still have to use a shitload of repeaters though.

      Note that this information is only sort of accurate, it's just what I've gleaned from discussions with people who really know what they're talking about. If you'd like to get a more scientific picture of what's going on, go here:

      http://www.testmark.com/de vel op/fiber/fiberoptic.html

  31. Re:New Zealand is sharing some capacity with Oz by netwerk · · Score: 1

    do you think anyone cares?

  32. Re:Map of Australia's Links to the US by B747SP · · Score: 2
    That's not actually accurate. That's a map of a private network operated by the incumbent telephone company in Australia. Yes, they do have a huge chunk of the Internet market here, but that isn't a map of Australia's connections to the Internet.

    There's a whole bunch of others owned by different Telcos and stuff. It's a messy picture, and no one provider (or even two providers) has been able to offer a good (read fast + reliable) service out of the country.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  33. Re:Public Infrastructure - Optus End-User Agreemen by netwerk · · Score: 1

    get your facts straight ass hole

  34. Re:Whose next? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    is that your actual view

    if so it's the normal crappy view of the rest of the world that most westerners have

    you can't ban Doom if no-one has a PC!!

    and the last time i looked the people Johannesburg (check sp!) weren't naked
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  35. too much bandwidth? by ferich · · Score: 1

    I know the subject sounds absurd, but this sounds uncannily like one Napster idiot observing my ResNet connection and remarking, "Hey, that's a fast connection you have. I'm thinking about getting T3 for my computer, too."

    I'm a fan of more bandwidth as much as the next guy, but what price does this come to for the Aussies so they can "be just like the Americans"? 120 Gb redundancy connection. Not to mention, they won't be sharing this with anyone; this single pipeline connects Australia with the US. How many people does Australia have in comparison to Asia or North America? I'm too lazy to do this, but someone calculate average Kbit/sec/person for the continents, assuming everyone was online and accessing some obscure document in the US, say, the front page of Slashdot. (:

    --
    ~ferich
  36. Re:Plate tectonics by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    At 3 (generally observed atlantic expansion, or "What I was taught throughout high-school") inches per year, I doubt we'll have to worry about plate tectonics destroying these cables. No, I'd be more worried about undersea lava eruptions, deep core oil drilling, or sinking ships severing the cable.

  37. Re:I'm an off-topic geek... but I can't help it by tral · · Score: 1

    Variation in all things. 299,792,458m/s is the average speed of light.

  38. Australia-centric by Legion303 · · Score: 2


    The whole world doesn't revolve around Australia, Slashdot. How about some American articles for a change?
    </parody>

    -Legion (donning Euro-flame-proof suit)

  39. Aussie by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
    scum!


    All generalizations are false.

    --

    --
    I like to watch.

  40. Re:Yeah, I knew that... by jpeach · · Score: 1

    yeh, Foster's started showing up on tap at various pubs that never used to touch it :) .. it's kinda died down again now

    Coopers is still the best Australian beer (IMNSHO)

  41. Re:Now we can spend more $$$$ by jallen02 · · Score: 1

    And your a fool.

    Its a fact, places with higher percentages of gun ownership have less crime.. PERIOD.

    Dont buy into all this "tightening gun laws saves lives"

    Its total bullshit.

    If they took our guns away that would be one step closer to making this country a police state (this country being US)

    How would you like the only people who have guns to be the "police", and the "criminals"? Of course your a criminal for owning a gun of they were totally outlawed.

    Far to many people jump on a bandwagon they truly understand very little about.

    What needs to happen is parents need to take responsibility and teach their children the truth about guns and stop spreading FUD and doing asinine shit because a few accidents happened

    Of course gun laws were invented to keep *SLAVES* from getting guns, hows that for nice.

    Our country was founded on guns and free people fighting with them, thats the way its always going to stay, at least as long as your free..

    Jeremy

  42. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by Leto2 · · Score: 1

    Same as with Heineken.

    Although it's popular here, it's the "Bud" of this country.

    But I'm glad y'all think we're cool :)

    --
    <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
  43. Re:Whose next? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    thank you my friend

    I love this place. Information I didn't even know I wanted. Good to see something counteracting the crappy view that anywhere outside the US, W. Europe or Japan is just a clump of mud huts filled with starving cavemen.


    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  44. Whose next? by addaon · · Score: 3

    Okay, now Australia has a broad enough pipe that they might as well be part of the US, from a network-routing point of view. Western Europe has been in that situation for a long time; there's no real difference between getting something from Britain, France, Oklahoma, and now, Australia. When is the rest of the world going to join in? The "ring of fire" around Africa seems to have dropped out of the news. I know of no major plans for eastern europe or asia. Is the rest of the world economically well off enough that soon they will be players, too?

    --

    I've had this sig for three days.
    1. Re:Whose next? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      maybe it's cos none of them can read anything but English. I'm not sure if the paranoia about the far east has faded since the Tiger Economies started looking more like pussycats but the probablility is that the economic colonisation would probably come the other way. Which, according to capitalists, is no bad thing as the competition provided by international trade should benefit everyone (trade tarrifs - pah!). It's a shame the model is flawed but that's the subject for a different weblog.


      .oO0Oo.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Whose next? by DiviN · · Score: 1

      well, now i might consider coming back to Aus...

      About Southeast Asia floowing suit, there seem to be some differences of opinon between US backbone operators and Asian Telcos.
      The yanks argue that more traffic comes in from Asia than traffic goes out from the US to Asia.
      Therefore they presented a rather large bill to various Asian Telcos/Governments;

      The Telcos argue that this resembles colonization and that they'd be treated unfairly, etc. To make it short, they don't wanna pay.
      And as long as that dispute is still not settled, it's unlikely that Asian Telco's finance the project that Malaysia and Singapore spearheaded last year.

      That concept would route India and Southeast Asia through Malaysia and Singapore and then through the longest ever underwater cable.
      [Note, Malaysian's are always into projects that bring the World longest, highest, fastest, biggest, whatever-est results -like they got the World tallest building - and to drive it home, they have it twice over - the Petronas Twin Towers in K/L]

      Of course, it would also be the World largest dataline and whatever else in tru one-upmanship in every aspect.

      Trouble is, the project is expected to cost about 13 billion and while everyone paid their first instalment, with Malaysia and Singapore also paying their secon and third, everyone else put it on a hold until the 'pay for routing dispute is settled'.
      Stupid of the yanks, really, cause they would have not only provided about half of the components, but would have opened Asian markets once and for all to American commerce.

      ---to be continued in a galaxy near you - i suppose---

    3. Re:Whose next? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Another excellent place to find information on internet availability in developing countries is www.nsrc.org. From back when I was actually working on this stuff in the mid-90s, this was always a great way to find contacts at the local telcos as well as to get a sense of the situation on the ground. The excitement of posting the first traceroute to a new country has probably passed (there's still an opportunity for someone to spot Iraq!) but the info is still great (and relatively up-to-date, even now).

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:Whose next? by Devastator · · Score: 1

      Three Sixety Networks (a company based in Vancouver, Canada) has teamed up with Alcatel to do a trans-pacific cable from Canada, to Japan.

      As well, they have also proposed a trans-atlantic cable from New York to England. If enough support/interest is shown for the trans-atlantic one, then its a go.

      Apparantly the Trans-Pacific cable is due to open its pipe in '05.

    5. Re:Whose next? by oingoboingo · · Score: 1

      When is the rest of the world going to join in?

      i think they've all been too busy trying to feed, clothe, educate and house themselves to really get around to hooking up that new ADSL connection and get some quality pr0n flowing.

    6. Re:Whose next? by friedo · · Score: 2

      In time, I think. Remember, someone's gotta pay the bills. Most people in Africa don't have computers, and many parts of Asia, like India and China, are not very wealthy areas either. I believe when the money is there, which it will be, then there will be a compelling interest to invest in high bandwidth pipes, but not until then.

    7. Re:Whose next? by matthew_gream · · Score: 2

      Building global optical networks is big business at the moment, and I would guess guaranteed cash flow for anyone that does so despite the enormous expense (reflected in the rush to grab optical fibre producers, layers and so on at high margins).

      Look at http://www.globalcrossing.com for instance, with its funky network maps - good stuff for infrastructure junkies! If you look also at their implementation strategy (namely, cross atlantic, and so on) you can get an idea about where they expect to pull a lot of revenue from (build the low risk things first), and Asia is certainly there. Despite the recent hiccups in the Asian business environment, it is seen as an up and coming region.

      --
      -- Matthew - matthew.gream@pobox.com, http://matthewgream.net
    8. Re:Whose next? by mr_exit · · Score: 2

      Much of this was done for the benift of New Zealand (Australasia is not just Australia), who as a country with a huge percentage of net users and a huge uptake of dsl and cable, suck most of what we look at (pron, /.) from the US.

      Over half of this new pipe was paid for by the NZ telco Telecom. and from their press releases they plan there will be no spare bandwith by 2002

      But the coolest thing about the cable has to be the cable healing robot robot
      ; ; ;Fitted to the cable maintenance vessel, CS Pacific Guardian, the Southern Cross ROV has bulldozer-like tracks that enable it to move along the sea floor at depths of up to 2,500 metres. It is also equipped with six horizontal and four vertical thrusters to enable it to "free swim" where the seabed is too soft to support the weight of the ROV.

      bats = bugs

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
    9. Re:Whose next? by Nater · · Score: 1

      And with the lower ping times it'll be so much easier to get frags in a game full of Aussies!

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    10. Re:Whose next? by reg · · Score: 1

      For information on the "ring of fire" see:

      http://www.africaone.com/

      They plan an 80Gb cable loop around Africa by 2003.

      For general information on the Internet in Africa, the best source of information is:

      http://www3.sn.apc.org/africa/index.htm l

      -Jeremy

    11. Re:Whose next? by nacnud · · Score: 1

      Uh, we already had close to a terabit connection (http://telstra.com.au/bigpond/direct/aboutnet.htm ) so this is just a drop in the bandwidth ocean; the advantage of this is the low latency of the link.

  45. If only... by yetisalmon · · Score: 3

    If I were in charge I'd just connect a long phone line.

  46. Re:I'm an off-topic geek... but I can't help it by Leto2 · · Score: 1

    That's _after_ you've defined the second.

    The chicken/egg problem. Which was first, the second or the meter.

    ('the foot' is the wrong answer)

    --
    <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
  47. 70 ms latency by idiot900 · · Score: 5

    I've been a nerd nearly all my life, but it still floors me to think that it takes longer for information carried by sound to travel between two people yelling to each other from opposite ends of a stadium in Sydney than it does for information carried by the Net to travel between two people chatting from opposite sides of the globe...anybody else feel this way?

    1. Re:70 ms latency by Willie_the_Wimp · · Score: 2

      As a network equipment design engineer (I do crossbar / networking fabric ASICS), I am always just amazed at the progression of speed. I am working on a next generation super layer 3 (IP) switch (I won't say where (The Big Guy on the block...)). The box will support many tera-bits / sec inside a 6 foot enclosure...

      Get this: we are using 7+ GHz serial channels to move the data around the box (input linecard to fabric to output linecard). When you factor in the speed of electrons across the wires, the length of the wires, the data rate per serial link, and the number of parallel serial links that make a channel, at any given time, there can be a complete 64 byte ethernet min size packet living only on 20" copper wires.

      Also, we are making a switching decision every 300 ps (trillionths of a second).

      :) Great time to be an engineer!

      Willie

    2. Re:70 ms latency by AstroJetson · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I remember when I was a kid asking my mom how TV worked. She told me that you push this button right here and it turns the TV on, then you twist this dial to change channels and this little knob makes it louder or quieter. Completely unsatisfied with this answer, I went to my dad and he gave me the answer I was looking for....you see there's this station that transmits an encoded signal that's picked up by this antenna here.....and so on.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    3. Re:70 ms latency by QuantumG · · Score: 2

      well yes, actually when I first got on the net I was astounded. I had never really played with network cards and I'd only seen LAN's from a distance. When someone tried to explain the concept to me they got stumped on the word "connections", ie. the cables connecting distant computers, and they explained it as a bunch of modems. Seriously, this is how the Internet was explained to me in 1992: Imagine you have a whole lot of BBS's around the country and you give to each of them another telephone line and modem and connect them all together. Then I asked how they could get more than one person's messages across the one phone line (you have to remember that I had a Commodore 64 with a 1200/75 baud modem and the guy was trying to explain the school unix system to me) and they turned to HS/Link, a transfer program that actually allowed you to upload and download files AND talk to the sysop, all at the same time. The concept of the packet was introduced to me, the idea of routing but never any mention of how the data got from one LAN to another. So when I finally managed to get onto the net (I had dailup access to a BSD box on a service called BrisBug) I was astounded at the number of people I could talk to at the same time on IRC. I eventually got a shell on a box in the states (SunOS) and learnt how to code in C, and eventually I did learn what frame relay was. I never really got over the whole thing though. That I was actually talking to a computer halfway around the world. With every keystroke on my C64 I was initiating computation on a half dozen routers, drilling down the TCP/IP stack on the destination machine, hitting the shell and bouncing all the way back and it appeared to be no slower than typing on a BBS (at 1200/75 it really does appear that way). Even today my mind congers up images of packets screaming through tubes in a duality of physical connections and conceptual ACK/NACK maintained TCP connections and I can't help but look on with awe.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:70 ms latency by LS · · Score: 1

      People who are repeatedly amazed by this sort of thing are by definition nerds.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    5. Re:70 ms latency by friedo · · Score: 2
      anybody else feel this way?

      Yes! I've always been infatuated with the concept of how fast we can move information. In high school, one of my favorite physics problems was about a radio DJ, and figuring out which took longer: the time the EM wave takes to get to the receiver, or the time his voice takes to get to the mic? (It depends on distance and I forget the numbers, but the mic took longer.)

    6. Re:70 ms latency by Baki · · Score: 1

      I know, i was just roughly calculating the theoretical minimum possible.

      Although, I should have taken into account that theoretically it would be possible to dig a tunne through the earth (vacuum of course) which would shorten the distance to maybe 10000km.

    7. Re:70 ms latency by ckedge · · Score: 1


      But if we ever get those neutrino beams figured out, it will only be 8,000 / 300,000 = 26ms.

    8. Re:70 ms latency by QuantumG · · Score: 2

      and proud of it, because it is the nerd who truely understands how remarkable this really is and his (invaribly) reflection shows a form of respect that many would do well to understand. The teenybopper who thinks the Internet is all about chatting to their mates from school using AIM and downloading mp3's just simply puts it down to magic. Somehow it works and that's all that matters and, even if he were curious, may never truely understand it enough to shape these highly technical concepts into a visualization of real world experience. And yet, when the same slack jawed porn surfer sees an artist's rendition of electrons spinning on the event horizon of a black hole or "the computers in the movies" they stare bewildered and amazed.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:70 ms latency by Baki · · Score: 1

      Still, 70 ms latency (in addition to your connection to the ISP) is a bit much. It will make playing Unreal Tournament quite hard for sure.

      Alas due to the speed of light it can't be much lower than 60ms (20,000km / 300,000 km/s = 66ms).

  48. Re:That's 3000 mp3s per second. by FunkyChild · · Score: 1

    Ah, but it depends how many people are sharing Metallica's new album. That could skew the figures somewhat ;)

  49. 70 msec? by toofast · · Score: 2

    Seems like a high latency for that type of connection... Wouldn't 70 usec (microseconds) make more sense? Or maybe 7 msec?

    1. Re:70 msec? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      In quantum computing theory there would be 0 latency
      .oO0Oo.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:70 msec? by bernywork · · Score: 1

      Well, actually no it doesn't. Currently, I am running a 768K to the US, (International Private Line) INCLUDING switching and routing delays, the MAXIMUM I would expect to see would be 45 milliseconds. I recently went through an outsource of our comms, and 45 was the max that we would allow. A couple of carriers came in at 35 - 40 milliseconds

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    3. Re:70 msec? by LiTHium[ion]+ · · Score: 4

      The bandwidth has nothing to do with latency. Even if it were going at the speed of light, there'd be latency issues when going halfway around the globe. 7 ms, as you suggest, is faster than it would take light to travel the same distance.

    4. Re:70 msec? by bmetz · · Score: 3

      The speed of life is a bitch, ain't it?

      --
      What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    5. Re:70 msec? by Benley · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, but it is travelling at the speed of light. The time it takes for light to travel from LA to Sydney is roughly 40 milliseconds, and I'd allow for another 30 milliseconds or so of latency for switching. Thus, the 70msec time makes a lot of good sense.

    6. Re:70 msec? by state*less · · Score: 1

      The speed of light is finite. That's about the fastest light can get from australlia to the U.S. I'm glad i live on the global hub (U.S.)

      Time is Change.

    7. Re:70 msec? by Daath · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, maybe some time in the future, we'll see "worm-hole networking" ;-)
      Hey. Cool.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  50. eek! by Biggels · · Score: 1

    120 gigabit Pipe to FLorida Begins Operation? Elderly citizens voting at 120 gb?

  51. Filter speeds by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 3
    It's great that Oz gets fat pipes, but the filter servers will still slow things down.

    Or are they going to forgo their censorship?

    1. Re:Filter speeds by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
      I got that impression from an article mentioned in slashdot earlier this year.

    2. Re:Filter speeds by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

      the filter servers will still slow things down.
      Or are they going to forgo their censorship?


      Actually if they filtered porn, the pipe would be faster. Just like the overhead of filtering advertisements is less that bringing them. YMMV.
      __

      --
      __
      Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
      GW Bu
    3. Re:Filter speeds by intmainvoid · · Score: 2
      What filters?

      The censorship in place in Australia restricts what you can have available on your server, not what you can download from overseas. At no point on the network is filtering mandatory.

    4. Re:Filter speeds by Striker5 · · Score: 1

      The net community and the government came to a tacit agreement. They'd pretend that their censorship regime was in place and working and we promised not to laugh out loud.

  52. You're too impatient, light is slow :). by TheLink · · Score: 3

    Speed of light is about 300,000 km/sec

    Network distance from Australia to USA is about 15,000km, noting that the network is a ring and it's said to be 30,500km long.

    15000/300000=0.050 seconds=50 ms.

    So 70ms is not too bad, considering that the speed of light in fibre optic cables isn't as fast as in space, and there is probably some network latency at the ends and the repeaters.

    That's why I'm an HPB. It's about 150msec(Pacific Ocean) + 120 msec (56K modem signal processing time) + 50-100 msec for various internetwork latencies. So I end up with 370msec on a good day.

    Cheerio,
    Link.

    --
    1. Re:You're too impatient, light is slow :). by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      lazybeam@deepthought [~] traceroute slashdot.org -i ppp0
      traceroute to slashdot.org (64.28.67.48), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
      1 0104.tob.iprimus.net.au (202.138.47.26) 147.698 ms 146.395 ms 137.944 ms

      Damn modem.

      [snip]
      9 gigabitethernet4-0.wel-gw1.perth.telstra.net (203.50.113.18) 216.542 ms 21 6.797 ms 217.524 ms
      10 pos1-1.paix1.paloalto.telstra.net (203.50.126.26) 446.069 ms 436.980 ms 4 47.140 ms

      There's the international link. But why did it go across Australia before going overseas?

      [snip]
      19 slashdot.org (64.28.67.48) 520.625 ms 520.457 ms 527.247 ms

      And there it is.

      lazybeam@deepthought [~]

      It looks like I didn't use the new link at all.
      (Well using Telstra instead of Optus... I was going to change ISPs anyway :)
      --

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    2. Re:You're too impatient, light is slow :). by toofast · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I hadn't calculated it that way =) Thanks for the clarification.

    3. Re:You're too impatient, light is slow :). by mlogan · · Score: 1

      Actually 300,000 km/sec is the speed of light in a vacuum. It is somewhat less when traveling through a glass fiber.

      -Mark

  53. Re:Oh boy... by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    Just cause we arn't in the centre of the internet world. Cut us some slack!

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  54. I wonder ..... by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    I wonder when there will be a big fat pipe going from western europe to east asia that does not depend on the USA.

    Routing through the mideast is a little dicey given the political instability. The infrastructure costs make a fat pipe via siberia a real pain.

    The point is simply redundancy, as well as opening up the net to other areas of the world. a fat pipe going through that part of the world would help this out tremendously.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:I wonder ..... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      nor the Portugese :-)
      .oO0Oo.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:I wonder ..... by while · · Score: 1

      As much as the Internet is touted as being global, what percentage of your packets ever go to Asia or Africa, would you say? Most of them stay within your own country simply because that is where you will find the most content in your native language and culture, and I only say culture because Spanish content in South America probably isn't all that interesting to Spaniards.

      Then again, I could be wrong...

      --

      (end comment) */ }
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]

    3. Re:I wonder ..... by vheissu · · Score: 1

      Perhaps with the reemergence of extreme hardline communisism in Russia, someone will decide that it is the Will Of The People to build a Trans-Siberian pipeline right next to the railroad...

      --
      /* This post not warrantied for mission critical applications. */
    4. Re:I wonder ..... by mko · · Score: 1
      I wonder when there will be a big fat pipe going from western europe to east asia that does not depend on the USA.

      There is a direct link, although it's not all that fat. It's called FLAG (fiberoptic link around the globe). Search google. The first hit is an article by Neal Stephenson, a great read.

  55. Re:Oh brother... by shmick · · Score: 1
    I think you are mistaken by the header of the link. "The Australian" is a national newspaper (owned by Rupert Murdoch) hence "Australian IT" is just a title of a section of this newspaper (the Information Technology section available in Tuesday's editions in fact). It is certainly not a promotion of the state of the art in Australian Information Technology.

    If you are in fact referring to the IT section of the Australian being a bit naff, then I would wholeheartedly agree. Along with nearly all mass media in this country (with the exception of SBS and ABC) and Murdoch's crud in particular.

  56. Re:Two separate cables? by B747SP · · Score: 3
    No, they're not laid next to each other. They follow quite different (and well seperated) routes. Also, there's not actually two cables. There's a whole bunch of them, criss-crossing in different places. It looks like a good plan to me.

    See Map of network for details.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  57. /me pinches himself by QuantumG · · Score: 2

    it's like some beautiful dream. Would someone care to comment on the politics of this? Why in the last year we've gone from modem to cable to dsl and now they're actually working on the backbone? Who the hell is behind this? Maybe we should send them flowers or something.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  58. Re:What about Antartica? by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    We used to be like that. THen the government made a deal with this independent christian. THey voted for some internet censorship and he voted for racsist policies against the aboriginals involving land rights. We don't like our government please invade so we can get rid of them! It doesn't work though. As much porn as we want still!!!

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  59. New Zealand has the WWW-IntErnet too! by Sycophant · · Score: 1

    The Southern Cross Cable also connects New Zealand to the US (and Australia). It is a great relief, when our existing connections were high latency and not always the most reliable.

    Actually this is more of an NZ thing than an Australian thing, the majority of the Southern Cross company is owned by NZ Telecom... But the Aussies are taking credit, just like they did for Crowded House and Russell Crowe... Bastards!

    1. Re:New Zealand has the WWW-IntErnet too! by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      Its just that they have to come to australia to become big.. And they are all aussie citizens mate. Just because if the said they were from NZ they would reply wheres that. To many attractions over here obviously including the bledisloe cup. he he he

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    2. Re:New Zealand has the WWW-IntErnet too! by Kiwi+Bstard · · Score: 1

      Crowded House is no more yours than Pavlova you Aussie Wankers. Neil Finn, the drving force behind Crowded House, is as proud a NZer than anyone else. BTW Phar Lap is ours too. Try and deny it.

  60. Yet more proof that the Internet is American... by Throw+Away+Account · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'm serious. The highest-bandwith path from Italy to France is Italy-US-France. The highest-bandwith path from South Korea to Japan is South Korea-US-Japan. In only a handful of cases are two nations that share borders linked to each other better than each is to the U.S.

    You want the Internet to be properly recognized as international? Then build some fscking intra-Asian and intra-European bandwith already!

    --
    There's no "we" in team, only "me"
    1. Re:Yet more proof that the Internet is American... by corvi42 · · Score: 1

      ya, there were lots of internet cafes in Toronto a few years back, and they all seem to have disappeared. Kinda sucks really - I like the idea.

      --

      There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
    2. Re:Yet more proof that the Internet is American... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      >hell they still have internet cafes

      And very useful they are too, if you're travelling and want to use your web mail account to keep in touch with home.

      A friend of mine recently got back from a round the world trip. He sent me email from everywhere (South America, Australia, NZ, even Tibet) except the U.S.A because he couldn't find any internet cafes.

      Aus and NZ in particular have a young traveller culture, and in places like Sydney there are internet cafes on every street corner (only a slight exaggeration).

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    3. Re:Yet more proof that the Internet is American... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      According to the Southern Cross brochure, 50% of the network is owned by New Zealand Telecomm. Hardly just an "American interest". This cable works both ways, opening up avenues of communication and commerce.

      Further more, it should be noted that the Southern Cross runs through Fiji as well. This brings much needed bandwidth to some Pacific Islanders. I work for a company that works in this region and the Southern Cross is a big boon.

      I think its hard for a lot of people to understand the Pacific Rim area. Improved telecommunications will have a dramatic impact. Flying out to some of these little atolls certainly feels like being in an Indiana Jones movie. During the recent coup attempt in Fiji, the internet media continued without disruption and provided much better coverage than other media forms.

      The internet is GLOBAL. I used to work at an internet translation company. I worked on jobs that coordinated via the internet with translators in many different countries. On a single job there might be translators who lived in Europe, Asia, South America, Africa etc. It doesn't always work well or fast, but the internet is more than just America.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  61. Re:more fun for me! by netwerk · · Score: 1

    its morons like you that give australia a bad name

    get a clue

  62. Re:Dont forget New Zealand!! by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 1

    that was a pointless post
    i was simply pointing out the facts

  63. Re:Stadium Info Theory by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Thanks for clearing that up. I give that maybe 1 bit of information. Unless the chant varies scansionwise? I mean you have two teams busting their asses to raise your testosterone and epinephrine levels, and yet both sets of fans are chanting the exact same thing?

    __________________

  64. Re:Plate tectonics by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Whales getting tangled in the cables is also an issue. Harder on the whales than the cables.

    __________________

  65. Re:gun-toting lunatics by robot_zero · · Score: 1

    "Extraordinary statements need extraordinary proof."

    Fact: The District of Columbia has the toughest gun laws in the U.S., much stricter than most of the world also.

    Fact: The District of Columbia has had the first or second highest per-capita murder rate for the past ten years. Combine that with one of the highest rates of overall violent crime.

    Spankfish is absolutely right about the U.S. rate of incarceration. A closer look at those statistics show most prisoners are serving time for drug convictions not gun convictions.

    "Those who would sacrfice liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin

  66. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Victoria Bitter- urghh!!

    Emu was my favourite. On the plane back to Blighty I drank all the Emu they had on board - which made my transfer in Singapore in "interesting" experience.

    Mind you it wasn't as bad as my colleague who worked in a Swedish airline. They went out for drinks one night and woke up in Thailand. Ah the joys of cheap travel.
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  67. Think DWDM by Cato · · Score: 2

    DWDM (dense wave-division multiplexing) lets you run many wavelengths simultaneously within a single fibre - probably this pipe is already using this, but DWDM will continue to improve, meaning that you can just upgrade the kit at each end to upgrade your bandwidth. 1 Terabit, here we come...

  68. Australia Rocks by ToiletDuk · · Score: 1
    Maybe it's because I'm biased towards English-speaking nations, but lately I've noticed that Australia is playing a more important role in internet politics and communcations. Or maybe it's just because there's a lot of great hardware geeks and hackers in Oz... but I'm glad to see anything that increases Australia's presence online.

    Or maybe it's just those damned sexy female aussie accents. :)

    • _____

    • ToiletDuk (58% Slashdot Pure)
  69. Re:gun-toting lunatics by spankfish · · Score: 1
    So would you say that loosening gun laws in Columbia would lessen the frequency of violent crime there?

    Somehow I doubt this. The violence probably stems more from social factors other than people being disgruntled about the gun laws. I also wonder what the most commonly used murder weapons in Columbia are, and how this compares to other areas/states.

    --

    --

    NO TOUCH MONKEY!
  70. Re:That's potential bandwidth, folks.. by Cato · · Score: 2

    Good points mostly, but you seem to be saying that ATM is the only way to go for such big pipes - this is far from the case, particularly for IP traffic, due to the problems of scaling SAR on ATM router interfaces (i.e. slicing packets into cells then reassembling them). See http://www.juniper.net/techcenter/techpapers/20000 4-03.html for some background.

    Most large providers seem to be going for packet over SONET for IP traffic, and will ultimately go for MPLS alongside this. Eventually, SONET may well disappear or shrink as DWDM-native protection/failover becomes available. The good news is that the ATM cell tax is going away, and the cost of managing networks is going down (every node will be an IP or MPLS router, or an optical switch). See http://www.mplsrc.com for more on MPLS, it provides most of the benefits of ATM with much less complexity and overhead.

  71. Re:fairfax link; $10M for 155 Mbit/s for 15 years by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    then multiply it by 8 to get /MB price

    bzzt wrong

    don't you think there's a reason that figures are quoted in bps not Kbps


    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  72. Re:I'm an off-topic geek... but I can't help it by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2
    Nah, the second is defined as the time it takes for x to make n oscillations. Define x and n.

    --

  73. Re:My US Packets by rtaylor · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that the real hubs of the internet are Toronto, Montreal and Edmonton! :)

    --
    Rod Taylor
  74. Re:Map of Australia's Links to the US by OzJimbob · · Score: 1

    Just to prove how buggered the australian internet set up is, obverve the following traceroute:

    1 210.8.36.1 (210.8.36.1) 3.526 ms 2.226 ms 2.342 ms
    2 serial1-3.cor2.ade.connect.com.au (203.63.119.242) 2.072 ms 1.978 ms 1.93 4 ms
    3 fastethernet6-0-0.bdr1.ade.connect.com.au (203.63.113.78) 2.651 ms 2.500 m s 3.696 ms
    4 atm0-1-0-3.bdr1.mel.connect.com.au (203.63.112.69) 45.819 ms 14.796 ms 14 .772 ms
    5 Fddi1-0-1.lon6.Melbourne.telstra.net (139.130.49.81) 15.850 ms 17.774 ms 15.492 ms
    6 GigabitEthernet3-0.lon-core3.Melbourne.telstra.net (139.130.239.246) 15.692 ms 15.791 ms 15.710 ms
    7 Pos2-1.way-core3.Adelaide.telstra.net (203.50.6.86) 30.905 ms 23.569 ms 2 4.304 ms
    8 GigabitEthernet1-0.way-core4.Adelaide.telstra.net (203.50.117.18) 23.750 ms 23.782 ms 26.170 ms
    9 Pos2-1.wel-core4.Perth.telstra.net (203.50.6.94) 51.895 ms 51.621 ms 51.3 56 ms
    10 GigabitEthernet5-0.wel-core3.Perth.telstra.net (203.50.113.29) 55.052 ms 5 1.962 ms 52.283 ms
    11 GigabitEthernet4-0.wel-gw1.Perth.telstra.net (203.50.113.18) 52.718 ms 59. 031 ms 52.144 ms
    12 205.174.75.69 (205.174.75.69) 465.296 ms 464.902 ms 467.420 ms
    13 166.49.228.9 (166.49.228.9) 457.883 ms 459.724 ms 457.532 ms
    14 POS2-3.GW6.SFO4.ALTER.NET (157.130.197.77) 471.249 ms 470.961 ms 470.115 ms
    15 504.ATM2-0.XR1.SFO4.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.26) 477.613 ms 476.981 ms 477.93 7 ms
    16 191.at-2-1-0.TR1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.51.6) 474.051 ms 483.121 ms 472.0 90 ms
    17 127.at-6-1-0.TR1.DCA6.ALTER.NET (152.63.2.177) 528.358 ms 528.051 ms 527. 656 ms
    18 187.at-6-0-0.XR1.TCO1.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.17) 518.023 ms 544.072 ms 541. 069 ms
    19 193.ATM7-0.GW7.TCO1.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.109) 581.842 ms 527.414 ms 527.3 07 ms
    20 ctn-45904.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.32.22) 522.004 ms 522.983 ms 521.42 1 ms
    21 63.101.250.19 (63.101.250.19) 512.020 ms 512.199 ms 520.075 ms
    22 www.wcicable.net (208.240.93.67) 519.041 ms 517.108 ms 517.176 ms


    Observe: I'm in adelaide. My packet bounces from adelaide, to melbourne, back to adelaide, over to PERTH! over the OLD LINK FROM PERTH, bounces around the US for a bit, then hits your host. New link isn't touched. Now i'm no network infrastructure expert, but it seems to be that Australia lacks sensible routing within the country; the major backbones don't seem to be connected!

    --
    -"I still believe in revolution; I just don't capitalize it anymore." - srini!
  75. Re:gun-toting lunatics by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

    Fact: The District of Columbia has the toughest gun laws in the U.S., much stricter than most of the world also.

    Those laws were enacted in response to the high rates of violent crime escalated by the prevalence of firearms. It's not as if DC was a happy, peaceful place, and then suddenly someone randomly decided to ban handguns, and then everyone started shooting each other.

    Once the gun culture has taken hold (and in the case of DC, continues to be fed by irresponsible western neighbor Virginia), it takes as long time to get worked out so the city can return to peace.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  76. Stadium Info Theory by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Apples and oranges. You don't need a lot of bandwidth to communicate "Sydney rules!" (or whatever it is people shout about at Ozian athletic events). If you did need more bandwidth, you'd start getting into electrons and photons -- a heliograph or semaphore flag would do the trick, but a cell phone (preferably with SMS, given all that shouting) would probably be more convenient.

    What I find weird is the topology. Suppose all the people in the stadium were using a chat room to taunt each other. If they all use AIM, they've created an ad hoc network with its hub on one side of the planet and its nodes all on the other. And if they use various other interoperating chat networks, it gets even more complicated.

    Of course to the Freenet folks, all this dispersion is not weird, but useful...

    __________________

    1. Re:Stadium Info Theory by tpv · · Score: 1
      both sets of fans are chanting the exact same thing?

      Quite often, yes. Of course creative people do vary it a little to "Sydney Sydney Sydney..."

      Of course, attendance at local games is pretty poor so you'll hear a lot more chanting at international matches anyway.

      --

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    2. Re:Stadium Info Theory by tpv · · Score: 1
      whatever it is people shout about at Ozian athletic events
      That would be
      "Aussie! Aussie! Aussie!
      Oi! Oi! Oi!
      Aussie! Aussie! Aussie!
      Oi! Oi! Oi!
      Aussie! Oi!
      Aussie! Oi!
      Aussie! Aussie! Aussie!
      Oi! Oi! Oi!"

      Yes... seriously.

      --

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
  77. Re:It makes it easier for the NSA to sniff traffic by mato · · Score: 1

    Interestingly enough, the New Zealand segment of the Southern Cross Cable goes via Whenuapai, which is also an airforce base. Can you say Echelon?

  78. Re:Map of Australia's Links to the US by Athos · · Score: 1
    .au isn't the only one with problems. Consider this traceroute from Toronto back to the IP at step 1...

    traceroute to 210.8.36.1 (210.8.36.1), 48 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 ica-gw1.tor2.uunet.ca (205.150.154.41) 132 ms 209.167.167.253 (209.167.167.253) 415 ms 74 ms
    2 152.63.129.85 (152.63.129.85) 400 ms 364 ms 368 ms
    3 295.ATM2-0.TR1.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.128.42) 97 ms 64 ms 64 ms
    4 137.at-7-3-0.TR1.DCA8.ALTER.NET (146.188.141.209) 168 ms 119 ms 85 ms
    5 197.at-4-0-0.XR1.TCO1.ALTER.NET (152.63.32.193) 501 ms 510 ms 458 ms
    6 193.ATM11-0-0.GW1.DCA3.ALTER.NET (146.188.161.61) 90 ms 93 ms 89 ms
    7 Teleglobe-DC2-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.39.90) 101 ms 105 ms 101 ms
    8 if-3-0.core1.Washington.Teleglobe.net (207.45.221.226) 99 ms 97 ms 93 ms
    9 if-1-0.core2.Newark.Teleglobe.net (64.86.80.21) 101 ms 118 ms 102 ms
    10 if-9-1.core2.NewYork.Teleglobe.net (207.45.223.194) 99 ms 150 ms 115 ms
    11 if-3-0.core1.Scarborough.Teleglobe.net (207.45.222.106) 542 ms 526 ms 561 ms
    12 if-1-2.core1.Burnaby.Teleglobe.net (207.45.223.89) 632 ms 628 ms 556 ms
    13 if-1-0.core2.LakeCowichan.Teleglobe.net (207.45.223.174) 196 ms 179 ms 185 ms
    14 if-11-0-0.bb3.LakeCowichan.Teleglobe.net (207.45.222.110) 260 ms 346 ms 225 ms
    15 FastEthernet0-0-0.pad21.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.13.69) 496 ms 550 ms 510 ms
    16 GigabitEthernet5-0.pad-gw1.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.13.66) 510 ms 498 ms 526 ms
    17 FastEthernet0-0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 898 ms 826 ms 933 ms
    18 GigabitEthernet5-0-0.chw-core1.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.6.129) 1241 ms 1062 ms 1146 ms
    19 GigabitEthernet5-0.chw-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.13.54) 1141 ms 1095 ms 1138 ms
    20 Pos4-0.exi-core1.Melbourne.telstra.net (203.50.6.18) 1104 ms 1074 ms 1187 ms
    21 GigabitEthernet6-0.lon-core3.Melbourne.telstra.ne (203.50.6.153) 619 ms 723 ms 691 ms
    22 FastEthernet0-0-0.lon6.Melbourne.telstra.net (139.130.239.232) 1277 ms 766 ms 676 ms
    23 consat1.lnk.telstra.net (139.130.49.178) 744 ms 696 ms 679 ms
    24 atm6-1-0-2.bdr1.ade.connect.com.au (203.63.112.70) 630 ms 648 ms 655 ms
    25 fastethernet0-0.cor2.ade.connect.com.au (203.63.113.66) 615 ms 735 ms 687 ms
    26 jas22981-3.gw.connect.com.au (203.63.119.241) 709 ms 712 ms 844 ms


    Basically, tunnels through Toronto a bit (understandable), to the United States (also understandable, North-South pipes (to the US) are _generally_ larger in Canada than East-West ones). Then the surprise: it comes BACK to Toronto (Scarborough) and thence across Canada to the west Coast (Burnaby), and finally on a fairly tolerable Sydney-Melbourne-Adelaide routing.

    Depending on the ISP du jour, packets from my home machine to a machine at work (about 4.5 km straightline distance) get routed through Chicago and/or West Orange. Or used to. I think they finally resurrected the Toronto peering point that had died a miserable death a while back.

    --

    --

    --
    The Internet is the Suppository of All Knowledge. You get it in the end.

  79. Re:meter distance by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1

    The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.

    --
    :wq
  80. Re:Now we can spend more $$$$ by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    Why would we want to do that. Apart from net speed Australia is the best coountry on earth. Never hear this here "A kid killed his 30 classmates today"

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  81. I'm an off-topic geek... but I can't help it by honkycat · · Score: 3
    The speed of light is roughly 299,792,458 m/s

    Actually, the speed of light is _exactly_ 299,792,458 m/s. That number is what defines a meter. :-)

    1. Re:I'm an off-topic geek... but I can't help it by ksorim · · Score: 2

      Yep the speed of light is exactly 299,792,458 m/s in vaccuum. A second is defined as the time required for 9,192,631,770 vibrations of a Cs atom. Read about it here

  82. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by Throw+Away+Account · · Score: 1

    And if bandwidth was the case why not run to a closer contenant like ... Asia?

    No point to it. There is no intra-Asian network; every Asian country has a wider link to the U.S. than it has with any other Asian country. So all you'd be doing is sharing the U.S. link of the one Asian country to which you cabled.

    --
    There's no "we" in team, only "me"
  83. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    1) wireless is just not that fast. Wireless cannot in any way compete with hardline for speed.
    2) high frequency RF, needed for any kind of bandwidth, tavels in straight lines.
    3) They run the cable all that way becuase that's where the data is, and that's where the market is.
    4) Furthermore, they run the cable all that way because it's a bigger, safer investment.

    10 years? we're still using undersea cable that's been down for 25 years+.... don't understimate just how much data that is.

  84. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by WigsOfOz · · Score: 1

    Re-dig? I'm not sure if you have looked at an atlas lately, but most of that cable would be submarine, not subterrainian. It is not a matter of leaving behind a draw string through which you can pull 30,500km (19000 miles) of fibre.

  85. Ssssssppppppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddddddd by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    Finally lag free baldur's gate (hopefully)

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  86. The company laying the network... by mpak · · Score: 2

    Southern Coss Cable Network.
    Their main site is here
    and a nice little animation which shows how the network works is here.

  87. Re:Coopers Sparkling Ale by Dacta · · Score: 2

    Actually, I think Pale Ale is generally considered to be better. I enjoy them both, and Cooper's Dark Ale, too.

  88. Back to the future? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
    There was a time (early 90's) when it was quicker to get a packet from Vancouver, BC to Australia than it was to get one from Vancouver to Edmonton, Alberta (equiv: Washington to Montana). The reason, it turns out, is that a professor at the University of Alberta was continually backing up Gigabyte drive full of data from the UofA to a machine in California.

    The result was that he singlehandedly saturated the cross-Rockies pipe. The rest of us plebes with less-than joined-at-the-hip access to the national net got to deal with massive latencies (well over 300ms on average).

    With this new pipe to Australia, it looks like we may be back to the old trick of it being faster to send a packet pan-pacific, than to the next province. (though for happier reasons).

    Oh, never mind. I currently get 45ms to a machine in Edmonton... still better than the Southern cross pipe.
    `ø,,ø`ø,,ø!

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  89. Re:Plate tectonics by sid+crimson · · Score: 1

    Ohh.

    Sorry.... I made the same mistake the others did. Forgive me? Please? :-)

    -sid

  90. Re:Oh boy... by Kynes · · Score: 1

    a very dead thread by this point but i was gone for a couple days...
    true, 70ms is not a speed per se, but if you're communicating with someone in australia via a means that requires a lot of back and forth traffic, the latency becomes a big issue. if you're stuck waiting for a reply from a remote machine before sending out your next chunk of data (like say a result to a query of some sort) then latency adds up.
    sorry that my intent wasn't made clear in the original post... granted latency isn't as much of a speed limit as bandwidth, but it does have an effect on the speed of many types of communication)

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. Re:Isn't Japan already? by sjwt · · Score: 1

    Telstra is working on that,
    I cant rember what its called,
    but IIRC its a 320GBps link between
    .AU Japan and .US

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  93. Re:My US Packets by lpontiac · · Score: 2
    I think Telstra must have their US pipes coming out of Perth. (From machine in the west)

    1 core3-vic.melb.vch.com.au
    2 Cont1-0.wel3.Perth.telstra.net
    3 Fddi0-0.wel-core2.Perth.telstra.net
    4 GigabitEthernet4-0.wel-core3.Perth.telstra.net
    5 GigabitEthernet4-0.wel-gw1.Perth.telstra.net
    6 Pos1-1.paix1.PaloAlto.telstra.
    7 paix-f2-5.exodus.net

    Mind you, all of the packets from my home machine go through Sydney *sigh*

  94. Re:Isn't Japan already? by sjwt · · Score: 1

    Oh and its sceduled for 2003?

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  95. Re:Map of global connections? by illtyd · · Score: 1

    Try http://www.caida.org/tools/visualization/mapnet/. It does some cute java based maps.

    --
    ---- "First came stats, pulling habits out of rats ..." Steve Taylor - "Jung and the Restless"
  96. Re:Public Infrastructure - Optus End-User Agreemen by noz · · Score: 1

    Please explain what's wrong with this. Maybe you should read it again :)

  97. Re:Fosters...do one drinks the stuff by SimonKeogh · · Score: 1

    Please I've lived in Sydney all my life, I don't know anyone who drinks fosters. give me VB

  98. Re:What about Antartica? by illtyd · · Score: 1
    You can gaet lots of live information from the Australian Antarctic stations here

    --
    ---- "First came stats, pulling habits out of rats ..." Steve Taylor - "Jung and the Restless"
  99. Plate tectonics by Trinition · · Score: 4
    OK, that sounds great and all, but what about plate tectonics (SP?)?

    I'm not sure about the Pacific floor, but I know the Atlantic floor is expanding -- so this applies to trans-Atlantic cables at the veyr least.

    As the plates expand at the rate of [inces/feet?] per year, what happens to the cables? Is the growth small enough that the cables won't stretch to a critical frailty until after they've outlived their usefulness?

    1. Re:Plate tectonics by sid+crimson · · Score: 1

      This post was given a +5 "Informative"???

      This is hardly even insightful. Why not ask "What if the lochness monster finds the cable and bites it apart?"

      Why would anyone pull 15,000km of wire and leave only a foot of slack at each end?

      -sid

  100. Re:Made in Canada by radja · · Score: 2

    at least the urine isn't pink like yak-milk is...

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  101. Map of global connections? by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 2

    This is pushing the topic a little bit, but is there a map or other representation of the bandwidth that various countries/continents have coming into/going out of them?

    -

    --

    -
    Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

  102. Great News! by nihilogos · · Score: 1

    However the dearth of cable and DSL ISPs means that our lighting fast 56.6K modems probably won't notice the difference.

    --
    :wq
  103. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by B747SP · · Score: 2
    You saw it here first... AUSTRALIANS DO NOT DRINK FOSTERS. We export the whole production to places where people (1) think we're cool, (2) think we drink Fosters, and (3) drink Fosters because they want to be cool like us.

    They don't even bother advertising the stuff here in Australia anymore.

    Actually, I was having a drink (Victoria Bitter) in a pub just yesterday, and I asked one of my colleagues: "Have you ever seen an Australian drink Fosters other than under duress?".

    He answered in the negative. (Under duress includes no other beer available!)

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  104. fairfax link; $10M for 155 Mbit/s for 15 years by bug1 · · Score: 3

    http://it.fairfax.com.au/communications/20001114/A 41389-2000Nov10.html

    "A 155 megabit circuit between Sydney and California, licensed for 15 years, which cost $US10.3 million, was discounted by 18 per cent if purchased before the November sales deadline."

    It cost about 20c/MB retail for bandwidth in aus. This works out to a markup of 1400 times (see 1) between long term and short term prices.

    I hope this link does bring down retail prices.

    1) $ 10300000 / (15years * 155megabit * 52weeks * 7days * 24hours * 60minutes * 60 seconds) = 0.014 cents / megabit
    I think i worked it out correctly

  105. My US Packets by nihilogos · · Score: 2

    3 ATM5-0-0-1.cha9.Brisbane.telstra.net
    4 GigabitEthernet3-0.cha-core3.Brisbane.telstra.
    5 Pos0-3.ken-core1.Sydney.telstra.net
    6 Pos2-3.wel-core3.Perth.telstra.net
    7 GigabitEthernet4-0.wel-gw1.Perth.telstra.net
    8 Pos1-0.paix1.PaloAlto.telstra.net
    9 * paix-f2-5.exodus.net

    Perth? What the hell are you doing in Perth? That's the wrong side of the country?

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:My US Packets by nacnud · · Score: 1

      They're going by satellite link. Probably the way out of Sydney was congested.

    2. Re:My US Packets by skribe · · Score: 1

      Perth? What the hell are you doing in Perth? That's the wrong side of the country?

      It may be the wrong side, but it is most assuredly the nicer side. Perhaps your packets wanted a relaxing vacation ;).

      skribe

      Perth: Boring one day. Boring the next.

      --
      Blog
    3. Re:My US Packets by stressky · · Score: 1

      Actually... Almost all of the international links out of Australia go out of Perth - something like 85 percent of it. It's a major hub for our international traffic... Perth is also closer to the rest of the world than the eastern states... There are so many things going in Perth's favor that the only thing going against it is its' severe lack of population and its' backward mindset (It's full of whingers). As I'm a Sydneysider who originates from Perth, I feel I'm qualified to say this. Perth IS a hole, but its' only because the people there won't embrace progress.

      --
      ...this is getting out of hand
    4. Re:My US Packets by Ronin441 · · Score: 1
      Mine, from iPrimus in Perth, go:

      4 139.130.82.57 serial5-1-3.wel5.telstra.net
      5 139.130.238.230 fddi0-0.wel-core2.perth.telstra.net
      6 203.50.113.39 gigabitethernet4-0.wel-core3.perth.telstra.net
      7 203.50.113.18 gigabitethernet4-0.wel-gw1.perth.telstra.net
      8 203.50.126.30 pos1-0.paix1.paloalto.telstra.net
      9 209.1.169.97 paix-f2-5.exodus.net

      If you look at http://telstra.com.au/bigpond/direct/aboutnet.htm, you'll see that Telstra's fattest link to the US is in fact from Perth. So given that you're using Telstra, that's quite a reasonable routing. Presumably, Telstra not being part of this alliance, they're not yet using any of this fat new pipe.

      And, hey, routing can be pretty f***ed up. I've sent packets from iPrimus in Perth to iinet in Perth, and had them go via Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney. (For US readers, that's about 5000 miles for a 5 mile straight-line journey.)

    5. Re:My US Packets by Micah · · Score: 1

      Heh. You're right, I just tracerouted back to you so it does it both ways.

      Also interesting -- I just tracerouted from myself (Oregon, USA) to Costa Rica. It goes through Seattle, Chicago, New York, and MONTREAL. Montreal? What the heck???

  106. i'd like to be... by xjesus · · Score: 2

    that one customer.

    "We've already got one customer connected," Mr Stokes-McKeon said.

    imagine that you had that whole pipe to yourself.

  107. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by the_other_one · · Score: 1

    Canada has a beer called Molson EXPORT.

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  108. Re:Now we can spend more $$$$ by ashtonb · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. I would be interested in your explaination as to why the gun death rate **per person** is so much lower in Australia than America. Everytime the gun laws have been tightened in Australia, the amount of gun deaths has dropped. Australia still has problems, and many groups are looking to have heavy restrictions or even banning of handguns. For example, in 1998 there were 57 gun assults in Australia, for 19 million people. There were 280 other deaths, 234 of them were suicide. 21 accidents. In total there were 327 gun deaths in 1998. The Australian assult rate is about 1 per 350,000 people year. (1999 Statistics) The American assult rate is about 1 per 25000 people, (1997 Statistics) Notice anything. Less guns mean less gun assults. Incidentially, Australia has less assults with all weapons due to laws resticting use in public, and even private. Just thought I might clear a few things up.

  109. Re:What about Antartica? by Adam+Jenkins · · Score: 1

    Yep it's a dubious claim to fame but that Internet censorship law was passed. So all the porn sites etc were shifted to US sites which are cheaper anyway. Brilliant, the "don't buy Australian" policy instigated by the Australian Government. A more recent one was to make netcasting fall under the same law as TV/radio, but fortunately that one was quashed. The trouble is that the Govt has interests in competing technologies, and despite claims by every State that they're the secret hideout of the world's leading technology, we're hopelessly behind and anything good that is done here is done as a battle with rather than with the support of Govt. No less a person than Billy G has been known to comment on the confusing and contradicting laws/stances Australia has regarding Internet :)

  110. Wired Mag. by pepermill · · Score: 1

    Wired Magazine last year or two years ago now had a great article on the laying of sea cables and the wiring of some asian country....If I remember correctly, the article as talked about the history of cables that have been layed on the sea bed...it was really interesting.

  111. Re:Oh boy... by pb · · Score: 1

    I agree, latency is very important. But I was pointing out that article writing is important as well, and that one was atrocious.

    However, my fellow slashdotters didn't catch on, so I guess I shouldn't expect anyone else to notice, except maybe my old high-school Physics class, for instance...

    Incidentally, latencies with combination satellite/modem services are absolutely *horrible* for some services, like a second sometimes...
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  112. Re:gun-toting lunatics by spankfish · · Score: 1
    Its a fact, places with higher percentages of gun ownership have less crime.. PERIOD. Dont buy into all this "tightening gun laws saves lives". Its total bullshit.

    Extraordinary statements require extraordinary proof, and I would love to see you prove that, considering that the USA has more people in prison than any other country in the world outside of Russia. This place is paradise for criminals.

    If they took our guns away that would be one step closer to making this country a police state (this country being US)

    How would you like the only people who have guns to be the "police", and the "criminals"? Of course your a criminal for owning a gun of they were totally outlawed.

    Gun ownership is very restricted in Australia. I think that for the most part, people are glad that gun-toting lunatics cannot get their hands on ballistic weaponry. Gun ownership is what perpetuates your society of fear in America, IMO.

    Imagine living in a place where you didn't have to worry that someone might have a gun. That the worst they could do is beat you up, maybe. You'd certainly have less worry about being dead.

    Now a person like you would typically answer with something like "well if _I_ have a gun too, then I am safe". And we end up with situations like the US/Russian arms race and a whole lot of dick-waving bullshit. No thanks. I can live without it.

    For all the blithering that goes on, trying to equate gun ownership and freedom, none of the gun-toting trolls on slashdot can adequately explain what gives them the freedom to kill a man. You don't have that freedom. You have laws against that. You don't need guns to get rid of a sucky government in a democracy either.

    You can live in more freedom without guns.

    --

    --

    NO TOUCH MONKEY!
  113. Re:Not Just bloody OZ either by lushman · · Score: 1

    All it takes is one bloody kiwi to plunge all discussion into the gutter.

    Australia won the Rugby World Cup, Cricket World Cup, Netball World Cup ... the list goes on ...
    Olympics (NZ got one pissy gold medal - that's it)

    Go ahead, brag about the America's Cup, really. Please stop wasting bandwidth on our brand new super pipe.

  114. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by mallie_mcg · · Score: 1

    Emu
    EEEp, cats urine that stuff!

    Coopers now they can make some beer, and Hahn Ice is pretty damn smooth!


    How every version of MICROS~1 Windows(TM) comes to exist.

    --


    Do the following really mean anything? SCSA MCP CCSA CCNA
    --I'm not actually after an answer!
  115. Re:gun-toting lunatics by jallen02 · · Score: 1

    You can live in more freedom without guns.

    It is kind of late for that now isnt it?

    In an ideal world where no one has guns thats true, this however is *NOT* an ideal world.

    There are documented cases of towns with near 100% gun ownership (albeit small) that have virtually no violent type crimes.

    Jeremy

  116. Dont forget New Zealand!! by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 1

    Dont forget New Zealand!! the cable is 50% owned by a New Zealand company (telecom New Zealand), with New Zealand gaining the same benefits as Australia. Looking at the story submitted by an australian, and the high ranking comments in this story, it appears that this fact has been lost by readers. Australasia means more than just Australia - New Zealand and Australia. Readers might want to check out the facts where it even says the cable will be managed in New Zealand. New Zealand owns you.

  117. That's potential bandwidth, folks.. by Myself · · Score: 2

    A fiber can carry most anything you throw at it. Modern fiber optic systems use "Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing", or DWDM, which is a fancy term for "several signals on one fiber, each using its own color, and a prism at each end to split things up".

    In order to reach the press release bandwidth, you'd need to toss an OC-192 on every possible wavelength of every fiber in the cable. Riiight. Keep in mind that these beasts are managed by corporations, which are political by their very nature. Efficiency is not their strong point. Also remember that this whole network was designed for circuit-based telecommunications traffic, not the packets most Slashdotters are familiar with. The process of making the twain meet is not a straightforward one.

    Most telco networks don't run at anywhere near 100% utilization. Admittedly, wet cable is expensive stuff, so it's not often wasted. But if anyone believes that the ring could carry that amount of traffic NOW, all I can say is, stick to your software and avoid telco networks, for everyone's benefit.

    Furthermore, fiber of this sort doesn't directly affect the internet. You don't simply jam a transcontinental fiber into your Ethernet card, folks. Packet and circuit networks don't get along with each other. First, you cram your packets into an ATM stream, then you wrap the ATM data in a SONET transport layer. If you're using a really big ATM switch, you might be dealing with as much as an OC-48's worth of bandwith in one chunk here. But we're not done yet...

    See, you don't want to plug that OC-48 straight into the fiber, because then what would happen when you want to add more? So you're going to use the signals coming from your routers as tributaries to feed a big honkin' optical terminal like an OC-192. All the SONET payloads from the various tributary interfaces will be concatenated and shot out the high speed side. The lasers in said terminal will be tuned to a particular wavelength, and used to feed a DWDM coupler. Finally, the multicolored signal will head to the beach and go for a swim. Several Erbium-doped amplifiers later, (search for EDFA and do some reading!) the signal emerges in another continent and the whole process reverses itself.

    Keep in mind that any one company probably doesn't buy bandwidth in chunks larger than OC-12. Your packets will move more freely, yes, but nobody's gonna be seeing 120 Gigabits any time soon. The amount of paperwork, and the sheer number of companies that're involved in simply setting up one circuit, is phenomenal.

    Oh, and as far as survivability goes, that's old news. SONET was designed from the ground up to incorporate a redundant ring architecture. The data's always transmitted over two fibers at once, and the receiving device picks the cleaner of the two incoming streams. Network planners are careful to route the two paths diversely, so no one failure can bring down the ring. Ideally, someone can backhoe an entire fiber conduit and not knock down any traffic because every ring served by that conduit was ALSO served by another one on the other side of town. Ditto goes for undersea cables.

    I'm this close to setting up a little site to introduce computer geeks to telco concepts, so y'all don't keep swallowing these press releases whole. Anyone wanna help?

  118. Re:Now we can spend more $$$$ by intmainvoid · · Score: 1
    I assume you're with Telstra or Optus then.

    Telstra still has to cover the cost of whatever you download - so the charges do make it onto your bill. Why do you think it's capped at 512kb downstream? They can't afford for you to be using more than that - which explains why on the uncapped downstream plans, you have to pay if you use extra bandwidth.

  119. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by wowbagger · · Score: 3

    Actually, it's not that much bandwidth. Assuming a normal 16QAM signal (and that's being rather conservative), you get roughly 4 bits/Hz. Therefor, 1 Gbps is roughly 250 MHz. One TV channel is roughly 6 MHz, so this is only about 40 TV channels. One satellite (C band) is 26 transponders, or half the needed bandwidth.

    Looked at another way: 250 MHz bandwidth at 26 GHz is a Q of 100.

  120. Hey Blizzard! by schmack · · Score: 1


    Can we please have a Battlenet server back in Australia now?

  121. Made in Canada by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    For the record, Fosters is made in Canada. It's a good beer by USA standards, but as another poster noted, Aussies don't actually drink it.
    ***

    1. Re:Made in Canada by Striker5 · · Score: 1

      "It's a good beer by USA standards" Hardly a valid point 3 year old yak urine would be a good beer by USA standards. US brewers are the spawn of satan.

  122. Southern corss network is no currently up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Accoring to my ping times the southern cross link is not currently operational. I guess they are configuring routers right this secound. Both teltra's and the Optus's (the major backbones of australia)ping time are about the same. They havn't changed since June which clearly indicates that the southern cross link is not active. So where the hell is the southern cross link? I gather that article is not entirely true. It may be build but not operational.

  123. more fun for me! by ^chuck^ · · Score: 2

    No more crappy coffee pot cams for me!

    Now I can see koalas and kangoroos go about their daily lives eating the euycaliptis trees and bouncing around carelessly. A whole new avenue of NET entertainment has come my way!!!!
    happy happy joy joy :-)

    --

    Lemure, wtf! Don't you mean Lemur?
  124. meter distance by hilltop · · Score: 1
    299,792,458 m/s. That number is what defines a meter.

    Im pretty sure the definition of meter is 1/1,000,000 (one-millionth) of the distance from the equator to the north pole.

    hiltop

    1. Re:meter distance by WzDD · · Score: 1

      It used to be. Before someone realised how damn unreliable that measurement was.

  125. Public Infrastructure - Optus End-User Agreement by noz · · Score: 1

    It's a shame that Australia's primary telecommunications company that owns the largest public cable and copper infrastructure has pricing plans that restrict download and upload speeds. Optus with it's not-so-wide pipe had put in place an end-user agreement on incoming data on it's alleged non-restricted pricing plans. With this new pipe to the US, will more leniency be allowed for download-heavy users?? I think not.

  126. Not Just bloody OZ either by fredm8 · · Score: 1

    Oiii!
    The rest of australiasia (including NEW ZEALAND (remember we won the AMERICAS CUP twice)) is also part of the Southern Cross Cable, and it was in part financed by our bloody monopoly telephone company too. One entry point into this part of the world is in Auckland, and there is a link back to Sydney to complete the loop.
    It is a good thing (tm) too.

    1. Re:Not Just bloody OZ either by harl00 · · Score: 1
      bloody kiwis.

      -
      "Everyone knows he is a bleeder"

      --

      -
      "Everyone knows he is a bleeder"
      -harl

    2. Re:Not Just bloody OZ either by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find the Americans won it first, actually.

  127. 43 seconds? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
    But I want it NOW!

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  128. Yeah, I knew that... by Galvatron · · Score: 1
    I remember reading an article about how Fosters launched a huge ad campaign before the olympics in an effort to get enough Australians drinking Fosters that tourists wouldn't notice the lack of Fosters. I take it the campaign didn't go anywhere though?

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  129. Re:WTF by the_other_one · · Score: 2

    Correction make that post 74.

    Ok now I remember I am insane.

    Good: Everything is normal.

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  130. Re:Map of Australia's Links to the US by papason · · Score: 1

    Now the SCCN (Southern Cross) is up and running,
    this is in-accurate. My current employer was the landing station for the Sourthern Cross network.
    Our station in Nedona Beach, Oregon.USA. We are building more capacity as this is written also.
    See http://www.wcicable.com for our company.

  131. Now we can spend more $$$$ by intmainvoid · · Score: 2
    The only problem is the in Australia we get charged big time for what we download from the US, but we don't get paid for what gets downloaded from us.

    A bigger step forward would be for the US Backbone providers to come up with an equitable cost arrangement.

    1. Re:Now we can spend more $$$$ by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      I don't know what crap ISP you're with then. I pay a flat rate for cable at 512kb down/128kb up.

    2. Re:Now we can spend more $$$$ by mian · · Score: 1

      I read a news article about this a few months ago. They said 30% of what goes through the pipe is US downloading from us, and apparently the US providers were being made to pay for their end (tho they bitched a bit).. I haven't heard nothing since though.

  132. Isn't Japan already? by Goonie · · Score: 2

    Given the phenomenal amount of money Japan spends on this sort of thing, surely Japan (and for that matter South Korea) would ensure that they've got more than adequate bandwidth?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  133. Re:WTF by ckedge · · Score: 1


    You do realize that if you post to a slashdot article that you had moderated against, all your moderation is undone?

  134. What about Antartica? by jsmaby · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until Antartica gets connected; then I can set up shop there, and live in a censorship-free utopia! Well, perhaps that's mostly what Australia is...

    --

    Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.

    1. Re:What about Antartica? by addaon · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I understand, Australia is far from censorship-free. Indeed, they have been in the news (and on /.) recently about some of their more heinous policies.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  135. News flash! by Biggels · · Score: 1

    Wizard of Oz demands faster connection due to nationwide slowdown! Dorothy's nude photos falted.

  136. Re:Map of Australia's Links to the US by Overnight+Delivery · · Score: 1
    It looks as if your ISP (connect.com.au) gets it's bandwidth from Telstra.

    Given that the Southern Cross fibre is a joint venture betweeen Optus, Telecom NZ and MCI (ie. the competition) it makes sense that the it's not used.

    That said it still doesn't explain the fscked up route the packet takes.

    --

    When it absolutely positively has to be there.

  137. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by Overnight+Delivery · · Score: 1
    During the Olympics I drank a few Fosters at the venues, it didn't taste too bad, in fact I'd say it's better than VB (that's not very hard though is it?).

    I wouldn't drink it if I had a choice though, not when Tasmania is putting out fine lagers like James Boags and Cascade.

    --

    When it absolutely positively has to be there.

  138. Selective enforcement by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    I would prefer a situation of bad legislation being ignored to bad legislation wreaking havoc by enforcing it.

    There is the possibility of selective enforcement. Nobody is getting punished so everybody does it. But if the State, the judge or the local boss dislikes you, they can use the law against you.
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  139. That's 3000 mp3s per second. by e_n_d_o · · Score: 2

    Why don't we just use this measurement on /. from now on?

    So you could pretty much transfer everything on Napster over there in about 43 seconds.

    1 128Kbps MP3 ~= 5MB

  140. 4 fiber pairs?! by lilnobody · · Score: 1
    No, they're not laid next to each other. They follow quite different (and well seperated) routes. Also, there's not actually two cables. There's a whole bunch of them, criss-crossing in different places. It looks like a good plan to me. See Map of network for details.

    I dont understand why a huge company would go through such incredible effort and cost to set up a redundant fiber cable setup and only use 4 and 3 strands at a time. When the military base I work at was wired, they just ran 72 strands everywhere, since you just never know.

    Is there something I'm missing?

    lilnobody

  141. Crikey!!!! by seanmeister · · Score: 1
    This is great! We can finally FTP Steve "The Crocodile Hunter" Irwin back to Oz and be done with it!!

    What's that? He's already there?? And if he wasn't, you wouldn't take him back anyway??! Curse you Australians and the wombats you rode in on!!!


    Sean

  142. WTF by the_other_one · · Score: 2

    I Moderated this as Informative and it got marked as Funny.

    Moderation Totals:Interesting=1, Funny=1, Total=2.

    I don't get the joke.

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:WTF by the_other_one · · Score: 1

      Post 50 I moderated as Flamebait and it got marked as Troll

      No moderation totals available

      Am I going insane or is my mouse sick?

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  143. Re:Fosters...Australian for Beer by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Guys - Australians *don't* drink Fosters Lager. The most common Australian domestic beer is Victoria Bitter, and each state has their own brewery and prevalent brand (Cascade, Swan, Fourex, and Tooheys).

    If you want a really nice Australian beer, try Crown Lager, James Boag's Premium Lager, or some of the range of Coopers beers.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  144. Re:Oh boy... by pb · · Score: 2

    Just remember that: 70 ms is a latency, not a speed.

    "Speeds up to 70mph" makes sense; "Speeds up to 70ms" does not.

    Maybe I should have been more clear on this one; I had thought the quote would be enough.
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  145. Time To Surf The Pipe by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe now I can get good download speeds for music from my fave band in Papua New Guinea, although one could also get it from fan sites in New Zealand.

    Oh, wait, it's not just for Oz - it serves a whole bunch of countries down there.

    Penguin pics ... gotta download lots of them ...

    --
    Will in Seattle
  146. You've got it backwards by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    It's so Ozzies and Kiwis can download tons of stuff from the good old USA. Yup, it's a big fat pipe with plenty of curl and lots of air ... no Yanks globbin' it up yet, either!

    --
    Will in Seattle
  147. Silly map by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

    The "terrestrial connection" between Brookvale and Alexandria looks huge on the map but is listed as 31 km.

  148. U cant defy the laws of physics by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

    ummmm ok, EM radiation travels at 3e8 m/s The distance is 20,000km or 2e7 metres 2e7/3e8 = 0.06666 seconds or 66 millisecs. Packets can't travel faster than light (yet!)

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  149. Re:Map of Australia's Links to the US by Foddrick · · Score: 1

    Can anyone tell me why the fastest link to the US comes out of Perth ?
    Surely the east coast is closer.

  150. The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    With all the innovations in wireless web an so on I don't get why they would decide to run cable all that way. And if bandwidth was the case why not run to a closer contenant like ... Asia?

    This is good now, but what about when this becomes yet "another slow line" ... now you have a nice cable running to america .. that's about it.

    Good idea ... works for about 10 years ... then what?

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by intmainvoid · · Score: 1
      As you can see here, there is a 180Mbps satellite link to the US. The main problem with a satellite link is that the latency just doesn't compare to the cable.

      Also, cable is pretty cheap compared to launching and running a satellite.

    2. Re:The whole world of Wireless Internet ... by addaon · · Score: 3

      Unfortunately, high-bandwidth wireless (anything near this scale) is impossible. Not just hard. The sheer amount of spectrum it would take up to get 1G/s, given that you can only shove so much information over so narrow a band, is prohibitive. With small-scale wireless, it's not a big deal; the signal fades out in significantly less than a mile, and other transmitters can use the same range. To actually get worldwide wireless, without repeaters, would mean literally flooding the airwaves... ouch. Especially for future expansion; the US has enough difficulties now just splitting up the spectrum we have.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  151. Re:Fosters...NOT Australian for Beer by RedFive · · Score: 1

    Some one send me this after the Olympics...

    >
    > THE FOSTERS AD DURING THE OLYMPICS
    >
    > I don't have a kangaroo for a pet
    > I don't wrestle with crocodiles
    > And I don't wear a cork hat
    > I fight wars
    > But never start wars
    > I would rather make peace
    > I can wear my country's flag with pride
    > I am a rock
    > I am the ocean
    > I am the island continent
    > My brothers are the Smiths, the Wilson's, the
    > Santerellis, the
    > De Costis, The Wong's and the Jagamarras
    > I play football without a helmet
    > I like beetroot on my hamburger
    > I ride in the front seat of the taxi
    > I believe it's a prawn not a shrimp
    > I believe the world is round and down under is on
    > top
    > I believe Australia is the best address on Earth
    > And Australians brew the best beer.
    >
    >
    > THE REAL AD
    > I ate my pet Kangaroo
    > I am shit scared of crocodiles
    > And I wear a baseball cap
    > I start wars
    > But I never fight them
    > I would rather get pissed
    > I wear another country's flag with pride
    > I like to rock
    > To Billy Ocean
    > I am blind to my incompetence
    > My brothers are the Smith's the Wilson's, the Wogs,
    > the Lebs,
    > the Chinks and the Abo's
    > I watch football without a helmet
    > I take the beetroot off my hamburgers
    > I do runners from taxis
    > I believe the world is flat
    > And Australia is fucking miles away from anywhere
    > I believe Australia has the best address on earth I
    > just can't
    > afford it
    > And Australians brew the best beer on earth
    > And that's why we don't drink Fosters..

    --
    RedFive jedi_knight111@hotmail.com
  152. Now they've got the bandwidth there... by KNicolson · · Score: 2

    ...will someone set up http://www.koalase.cx as a new link for the slashdot trolls?

  153. We've been hanging out for this for years by B747SP · · Score: 3
    This is great news from the point of view of 'the Internet guy' in a company in Australia. Despite having three separate 2Mbit/s frame links to the net (that's huge in Australian terms) already, I have to deal with constant outages, delays and problems.

    That's largely because my provider is crap, but also because the only usefull way out of the country is by a fat link on the other side of the country. Theres lots of landline to carry traffic, and it seems to get broken a lot. The second route ex-Sydney is oversubscribed, and is useless as a contingency when the main one dies.

    I'll be the first to admit scepticism that this thing would ever be completed, but now that it is, the whole world changes for US. A whole bunch of new world-class providers will move down here now, instead of the second rate crap we've had to date.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  154. Map of Australia's Links to the US by intmainvoid · · Score: 5

    A map of Australia's links to the US and the rest of the word is here.

  155. Two separate cables? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    But are they laid next to each other?

    Even so it reminds me of what the boss of a local ISP (Jaring) said years ago. They had leased two international lines from the Telco and insisted that they be in separate cables.

    Somehow one line went down, then the other went down hours later.

    He asked the Telco for an explanation and they told him that a trawler broke one cable, then apparently a few hours later broke the next one :).

    And so it's scary that the Gov of my country (Malaysia) is still interested in transmitting power from Bakun Dam, East Malaysia to West Malaysia using undersea cables in the South China Sea. One idiot trawler or two and - nationwide blackout.

    Cheerio,
    Link.

    --
  156. Techtonic PLates.... by djmoocow · · Score: 1

    The rate @ which techtonic plates are like inches per yr.... and i can imagine that they have calculated for.... and this is not like a cable you are running from your telephone ...next you will be saying that because the continents are moving slowly that in a million yrs that cable will be useless.... i mean they are still using calbes that they ran during the early 1900's.... so think that the cable is safe.... and 70ms is a great speed for that distance ... i mean ... there are alot of optical repeaters along that routre...because as far as i know the max distance for fiber is 1400 KM.... so you are going to so a bit of speed over that time as well as switching latency ....

  157. What about Telstra? by Squirtle · · Score: 1

    There's no indication whether Telstra will
    be leasing bandwidth from CWO. That will
    be an interesting turnaround.

    I bet they have a "special" price :)

  158. New Zealand is sharing some capacity with Oz by oob · · Score: 1

    This is a Kiwi venture, the fact that Oz is gettting access is incidental. Note that many Oz Internet users alread get their access through Kiwi ISP's, such as Auckland's IHUG.

  159. internet traffic report by boldra · · Score: 1

    Now we've got a milestone we can use to see if http://internettrafficreport.com/ actually works.

    Hmmm... n o change yet...

    --
    I've been posting on the net since 1994 and I still haven't come up with a good sig!
  160. Propogation in glass fiber by jhines · · Score: 1

    Light slows down when it is traveling in something other than a vacuum. I don't know off hand exactly how much, it depends on the cable, but your time should be higher.

  161. Fosters...Australian for Beer by Daemosthenes · · Score: 5
    "The new Southern Cross Cable Network connecting Australia to the US is now operational. Featuring 120 Gigabit capacity and with a latency of 70 msec, the new trans-Pacific cable is 120 times the capacity of the existing Australasia/North America connection"

    Australian for "More Porn"


    54% Slashdot Pure
  162. The official web site... by B747SP · · Score: 1

    Southern Cross Cables, or, if you prefer to bypass the Macromedia slash crap: Southern Cross Cables Front Page

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  163. Thank God... by Teferi · · Score: 2

    They finally replaced the Tin-Can-And-String(tm)(c) link to GEO with something better.
    "If ignorance is bliss, may I never be happy.

    --
    -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  164. Re:Oh boy... by Kynes · · Score: 1

    whats wrong with that? the majority of content still flows out of the US. 70 msec to get half-way around the globe ain't half bad. if every connection was this good, we could theoreticaly never have latencies higher than that.