Slashdot Mirror


Jet Lag: 2 Reviews Of "The One"

If the Matrix successfully fused sci-fi, film noir and martial arts movies, maybe The One will end the shameless, non-stop ripoffs of the martial arts/ balletic combat sequences Neo brought to the big screen for the mass audience. This movie features not one but two Jet Li's, from parallel dimensions (sound familiar?), drop-kicking one another all over the galaxy, and both are stupefyingly boring. People who dodge bullets in slo-mo are getting to be so commonplace they're tiresome. And while we're at it, isn't it high time, so long as we're zipping people around via particle beams, to find a fresher weapon than the .9mm pistol that spews all those hot, clinking cartridges all over the place? Even passionate martial arts movie lovers can skip this one without regret, though two or three of the fight sequences were first rate. (Spoilage warning: plot discussed, not ending.)

These last few years have been good for lovers of martial arts movies, until recently a fringe cinematic genre, and for a new generation of stars like Jet Li. But The One (even the title is a ripoff from The Matrix) will bore even die-hard teen lovers of the form. It's slow, dull and humorless. Maybe it's time for this era to end. Jackie Chan does it a lot better, and with a lot more personality. John Wayne did the square-jaw resolute look a lot better. Li just looks ticked off all the time.

In this movie, the exotic and surprising spirituality of The Matrix is reduced to much incomprehensible gibberish about parallel universes --- the "multiverse" and the efforts of parallel figures -- in this case the two Jet Li's -- to seize control of all the different dimensions and become God of us all. Even the good Jet Li, who plays an LA County Sheriff and family man who is just doing his job and hanging around with his muscle-head buddies, and wants no part of this multi-universe politicking, doesn't exactly exude warmth. The bad Jet Li -- a monster from the parallel dimensions who transports himself through dimensions killing off competitors and look-alikes and agents from Galactic Central -- just glowers a bit more. Watching these Jet Li's square off in a noisy environment of Delta-force clad LAPD officers blasting away in their dark suits and racing unsuccessfully back and forth, traveling via Star Trek-ish time transporters, it's not only impossible to tell the good and bad guy apart at times, but pretty soon, you won't even care.

There are some nice special effects in this movie, and a super sound track that runs from jazz to hip hop to rock and rap, but there is absolutely no plot at all, and 90 percent of the battle scenes seem to take place in parking garages and sewers. They aren't nearly good enough to overcome this Jet Lag. I suppose this is all meant to be dark, but the primary impressions are just "low-budget" and "dull."

Review #2 from the second victim: chrisd

I really like Jet Li and I like science fiction, so *poof* -- a SF movie with Jet Li? A sure winner, right? Well, no. Now, I should point out that I don't expect Fellini from a Jet Li movie. I don't expect good writing, acting, casting, costumes, or even dialogue. I do expect a few things from a good fight movie, mostly good fighting, handy camera work and good lighting, and in an SF movie decent effects.

Unfortunately, "The One" disappoints. If you've seen the trailer or commercial (my way of saying spoiler warning ), there are some very cool things going on here: Jet Li kicking Jet Li's ass, Jet Li whapping people with Harleys, Jet Li flying through the air, walking the walls, jumping tenements in a single bound ... There is a lot of cool stuff going on. I assure you that must be the case, the problem is, they didn't do a good job of letting us see much of it. I don't know what specifically was wrong with the camera or editing work, but it just made you want to crane your head around to see what might actually be happening. Camerawork was one of the great things about "The Matrix." You could see and appreciate what was happening.

As Jon noted, the plot isn't really worth talking about, as there isn't much of one, and ieven that is very familiar. It's lsomething ike this: There are a bunch of universes, see, and so the bad Jet Li has traveled through 123 of the 125 universes killing the other versions of himself, becoming more powerful with every kill. As the parallel Jet Lis are killed, the Jet Lis who survive get more powerful, as the total Jet Liness is spread around into fewer Jet Lis. And so bad Jet Li, now very powerful, must kill good Jet Li (in our universe) to gain ultimate power. (Something Jamie calls the Law of Conservation of Jetliosity) Sound familiar? It should. It has been the plot of a number of science fiction franchises. In a scene near the end Jet Li even says "There can only be one of us."

But really, who cares about the story? This is a fight movie, after all. It should be judged accordingly. Can you picture watching a Jackie Chan movie and saying "gosh, this is really nothing like Sense and Sensibility"? Of course you wouldn't.

But you would want to see Jackie flipping ladders around while downing tequila shots and beating up neo-nazis. And Jackie delivers partly because you can see what he is doing. Jet Li is there, he's working, but the camera work stinks so you can't appreciate what he or his pals in Special Effects are doing. It's too bad -- "The one" could have been a lot more dumb, silly fun.

In short, if you really like Jet Li, go see it, but try to sneak in. One thing you can say about it is that it doesn't suck as much as "Romeo Must Die" did. (which isn't saying much, I know) and the effects when you can see them are kind of fun.

266 comments

  1. See Iron Monkey instead!! by Mudhiker · · Score: 5, Informative

    At first I was going to go see this, because I've enjoyed some of Li's earlier work (Though not as much as Jackie Chan's ;-) and I enjoy a good bit of kicking and punching. But after seeing the preview in the theatre (Or should I say spoiler...as that's what they all are these days...) I decided that this will be one to let the roommate buy when it comes out on DVD in a month or two.

    Instead, go see Iron Monkey! It's absolutely wonderful Kung Fu and a great story. (IANAMA)

    --
    "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
    1. Re:See Iron Monkey instead!! by locrian · · Score: 1

      I have to agree here. Even though I had to drive 60 miles to see it, Iron Monkey was worth the drive. Ang Lee *ALWAYS* delivers. The kung fu in this movie was excellent, especially the chain whip moves :) I will go see The One, but only because I'm a kung fu flick junkie. :) But if you're a Martial Artist like myself wanting to see EXCELLENT technique, check out Iron Monkey :)

      --
      A flute with no holes is not a flute.
    2. Re:See Iron Monkey instead!! by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

      A great story? All of the "moral" tones were dealt to the audience in an extremely heavy-handed matter, and all of the characters were close to one-dimensionally good or evil. The plot had as many storylines as a Soap Opera, though they merged much better than one.

      It was ok, but not something I'd watch again. OTOH, I did really like The One, even though I felt it could have had another 10 - 20 minutes in the storyline.

    3. Re:See Iron Monkey instead!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO

    4. Re:See Iron Monkey instead!! by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      You do realize that "Iron Monkey" is like 8 years old, and you probably could have rented a copy, right?

      I'm not arguing that it's a bad movie (it's not), or that Ang Lee doesn't deliver (he does), but this movie does not belong in the same "category" of recent releases to compare against movies like "The One". Although, frankly, how anyone can compare "Iron Monkey" vs. "The One" is beyond me. It's like trying to decide who'd win in a fight between Jackie Chan and Chow Yun-Fat, their styles are just too different to easily decide.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    5. Re:See Iron Monkey instead!! by gulped · · Score: 1

      You also realize that Ang Lee had nothing to do with 'Iron Monkey', right? The movie was directed by Yuen Woo-ping (fight choreographer for the Matrix, Crouching Whatevers, etc.)

  2. oh come on now... by No-op · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who *really* sees Jet Li / Jackie Chan / etc movies with any intention of good screen writing, a plot, or any sense of meaning? just enjoy the gags and the moves. if you're poor buy it 3 years later from walmart or steal it or something.

    I see every jet li flick I can, even if I know it's going to "suck", because the man is amazing. then again I guess I have low standards, since I don't even pretend to care about the existence of a plot line. bah.

    --
    EOM
    1. Re:oh come on now... by ekrout · · Score: 2

      This movie offers brainless high-tech action without interesting dialogue, characters, motivation or texture. In other words, it's sure to be popular.

      --

      If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    2. Re:oh come on now... by Grahf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps I went in with low standards, but I liked this one. True, it was a Matrix ripoff a lot of the time, but the parallel universe concept was a neat one. Yeah, it's been done before, but hasn't everything "been done," somewhere before? Perhaps I'm jaded, but it's impossibe to expect true innovation in cinema these days.

      I thought the special effects were pretty good, and the superhuman stunts that Jet Li did were most impressive. The plot was a bit silly at times; a bit more backstory might have helped. But then again, almost every martial arts movie I've seen has had goofy moments. (/me points at the Flying Sleeve of Death in Iron Monkey)

      In the end, for someone who's seen The Matrix a few too many times, The One was well worth the $3.75 I paid to see it.

    3. Re:oh come on now... by ellboy · · Score: 1

      My favorite quote from Ebert's review goes a long way to explaining martial arts movies in general... "Maybe one of the differences between a good martial arts movie, and one that is merely technically competent, is that in the good ones, the characters have a motivation, and in the others, life is just a competitive sport." --Roger Ebert

    4. Re:oh come on now... by Metrol · · Score: 2

      ...just enjoy the gags and the moves.

      That's what I thought going in the theater. Thing is, I have to agree with the reviews I've read here and elsewhere for one simple reason. The movie just wasn't fun.

      Was it Jet Li's flat acting? Bad camera work? I honestly don't know. I do know that when I left the theater from seeing "Iron Monkey" I was walking out smiling and glad I got to see it on a big screen.

      Definitely a movie to wait for DVD on. At least then there might be some entertainment value in how they did some of the special effects.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    5. Re:oh come on now... by No-op · · Score: 2

      Wow, was it seriously that bad? you seem more on par with how I feel going to these sorts of movies; when someone willing to accept all the usual faults (and to whom bad dubbing is totally transparent and not even a factor) says it sucks, then maybe it does...

      if so, that's a shame. I've always admired Jet Li's amazing skills, and I still wish he hadn't passed on the lead role in Crouching Tiger. that role would have much, much more appropriately fit a 3 time Wushu champion than Yun-Fat Chow (who, let's face it, is best in his shoot'em up roles in John Woo films.)

      ah well, can't have your almond cookies and eat them too...

      --
      EOM
  3. Point-nine-millimeter? by slackbp · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are no .9mm-caliber firearms. There are, however, lots of 9mm guns. (How do people come up with this stuff?)

    1. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You think Katz has fired a gun in his life?

      (Not that I'm an expert. Had few chances to fire a 9 mm gun during the obligatory military service over here. After that, absolutely no access to guns).

    2. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write with a 0.5mm pencil, but you can get larger; most BB guns are 4.5mm.

    3. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by mellonhead · · Score: 1

      .9mm is a tiny bullet that makes less noise and has almost no recoil...

    4. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Mudhiker · · Score: 2

      Nines are fine if you live in the 'hood or are participating in a joint NATO exercise but for good 'ol ease of use and stopping power nothin beats a .357 Magnum S&W.

      --
      "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
    5. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But, there are hypodermic needles this size! Maybe that's what he meant.

      0.9mm=19 gauge. You can get 18 and 22 gauge needles.

    6. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by falloutboy · · Score: 3, Offtopic
      "...and stopping power nothin beats a .357 Magnum S&W."


      I hear that. I was in Vegas once, and my buddies and I stopped at a gun range. Me, being the wuss of the group, got a .22 ruger (spelling?). Ammo for me for the whole day was something on the order of $5. Matt got a .357, and when he fired it, I was standing about ten feet behind him. I could still feel my belt buckle rattle.


      Oh right, the topic of the thread..


      I saw The One on Friday night, and I thought it was a really neat concept, just poorly executed. Did the numbers on all the gauges really need to be in that wierd pseudo-Kanji font?


      The thing that really rubbed me the wrong way was the amount of violence in the film. Yeah, it was an action movie, and starring Jet Li nonetheless. But most of the fight scenes were brutal, rather than well-choreographed. And almost all the violence was directed at cops.


      The Highlander ripoff dialogue at the end made me cringe. And that white multiverse agent was probably the worst actor I've ever seen outside Will Shatner.

    7. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by mikeage · · Score: 2

      Well... sorta. One of the reasons nines are so popular with many gangs, especially those that favor drive by shootings, is their penetrating power. A nine millimeter, because it's so much lighter than a .357, or even a 38, will travel faster and have way more energy (remember, KE=1/2*m*v^2), and can thus easily penetrate a car door, for example. Your .357 mag usually won't do that without losing a helluva lot of power (and chopping up the door nicely). Now, why people use hollow points instead of FMJ's for a nine, I never understood... I keep my 9mm loaded with FMJ rounds, and my .357 with hollow points. Coupled with the .45 (which is really just for show), it's a nice collection...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    8. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Moonshadow · · Score: 2
      I saw The One on Friday night, and I thought it was a really neat concept, just poorly executed. Did the numbers on all the gauges really need to be in that wierd pseudo-Kanji font?

      The funny thing is, I have that particular font on my computer (It's called Far East, I believe). These days, quite often, I'll watch a commercial, or a show, or a movie, or something like that and see something written in a font that was downloaded off of one of those free font sites with 6 bazillion popup windows, and recognize it.

      Kinda destroys the 'coolness' factor. And makes it easier for me to duplicate it ;)

    9. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by angelo · · Score: 1

      My copy of the font is called Hirosh. There are far better fonts out there that are just as illegible.

    10. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huzzah! Only a a roider (or medical type I guess) would know that. D-Bol and Sus 4evah!!!!!

    11. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Sam+Jooky · · Score: 1
      While you're right about the penetrating power of the 9mm, I can't imagine gangstas ever bother to calculate that out. I always assumed they used 9mm so much simply because of the cost analysis.

      I have a pair of .45ACPS (Glock and Colt), a Beretta 9mm, and a Makarov 9x18, for instance, and I shoot regularly with friends who have .40 and .357Sig.

      In the end, the 9mm ammo is generally the cheapest considering the size of the ammo you get. 1000 rounds for about 120$, versus 150$ or so for .40 and a more for .357. 9x18Makarov runs about 130$, and my .45ACP costs me an ungodly 240$ for 1000 rounds. Needless to say, I'm getting into reloading soon.

      Now, if *I* were in a gang, I'd go pick up some Mosin Nagants (you know, the gun used in Enemy at the Gates). They run about 80$, ammo is cheaper than 9mm ammo, and the penetrating power is amazing. It can punch a hole in half inch steel from a hundred yards. Just FYI, it's a 7.62x54R cartridge. AK-47s use 7.62x39, so there's about an extra centimeter and a half of powder pushing that bullet out the chamber. Fun as hell to shoot, and if you're not wearing earplugs, you'll be deaf the next day.

      Alright, so I'm severely off topic, oh well. Oh, yeah, "The One." Looks stupid, I'm staying away. Sam Jooky

    12. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by mellonhead · · Score: 1

      "A nine millimeter, because it's so much lighter than a .357, or even a 38, will travel faster and have way more energy..."

      I think if you check out an ammunition performance table you'll find that the standard .357 load has more velocity and energy than the standard 9mm load.

    13. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by mikeage · · Score: 2

      You know, you're right. Which is weird... I always was told that a 9mm had more energy, but looking up the numbers, you're right... might be time to switch ammo, then, too...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    14. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a diabetic, you ass

    15. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Pi-Zero+Meson · · Score: 1

      I saw "The One" I thought it was pretty good but not as good as it could have been. FYI the .38 and the .357 fire the same size projectile with different casings the .357 having a lot larger powder charge typically. The 9 mm projectile is only a tiny bit smaller then (less then a millimeter) smaller then that of the .38 and .357. So in actuality the .357 rounds are more massive and have a higher muzzle velocity then 9mm if you are firing rounds of similar shape. And because hallow points = fun that's why more people use them

    16. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by adturner · · Score: 1

      Of course, the effect of penentrating so well (actually, it OVER-penetrates), is that the 9mm sucks in actually keeping someone down after one shot. 9mm isn't designed to actually kill someone- which is why NATO uses it. Right now, 99% of you are "HUH?", so let me explain...

      What happens in the battlefield when you seriously hurt, but do not kill your enemy? Well, perfectly healthy bad-guys now have to go get said injured person and bring him back to the medics. This means that for each person hit, two or so more people are taken out of the fire-fight as they try to deal with their injured buddy. Hit enough people like this, and their supply lines are now full of injured people, not to mention the psychological effect it has on your opponent.

      On a side note, a 9mm, .357Mag, .357Sig, and .38 are all basically the same size bullet, though if I were going to pick one to knock someone down, I'd go with the .357Sig (same balistics as the 9mm +P+ load, though the .357Sig has about 100fps on the +P+ in any bullet weight). Personally though, I'll take a 10mm, .40S&W, (10mm is basically a .40S&W with a longer case) or .45ACP in a hollowpoint over any nine for one-shot knockdown punch. Not only are the rounds bigger/heavier, but they're not so fast that you have to worry about over-penetration- so you'll actually do some serious damage to the target assuming you get a solid hit.

    17. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really think you should think twice about being pro-cop. Yes. Possibly a few cops did us a service by taking down a single american flag from the towers.. but otherwise they still take bribes, serve the rich upper class and political fiends, and shoot rubber bullets at me. I wanna see a peace-love-happy-hugs hippy try and fucking take one in the back of the head, turn around, and say "please sir, may I have another?" I'm going to the IMF/WB/G20 protest on November 17th, and I will try to stay nonviolent for as long as possible. If I get another gas grenade hucked at my american civilian ass, I will be sure to find Jon Katz's magical ".9mm" gun (since its tiny as hell, must be concealable) and bust some shizit up :) Peace and solidarity..

    18. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
      0.9mm=19 gauge [tnt-audio.com]. You can get 18 [asu.edu] and 22 [asu.edu] gauge needles.

      Actually, this also equates to an approx. 2.55 pixel bullet, so even though Katz obviously didn't do much research on his technical side of things, he is still sort of right, because in The Matrix, I'm sure there are times where the bullets appear merely as 2-3 pixel objects on screen. ;)

    19. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh hell, why not just go with the most powerfull handgun made, The .50 Desert Eagle. Use either hollowpoints or frangible ammo, and you will only have to shoot once!

      I also saw on some website a 12-guage shotgun called the super shorty. It was maybe a foot long. Put some buckshot in there and damn, you can put 8 holes in someone instead of just one!

    20. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a Magnun sold .50 DE AE?

    21. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Katz was the one who, in his review of "Tomb Raider", said that her guns were 9mm. He seems to think that all handguns that are not revolvers are 9mm.

    22. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, diabetic needles are much thinner - 28 to 30 gauge. I had a roommate that was diabetic (I'm not) who explained that the thinner needles were suitable for relatively runny insulin, but the hard core drugs are thicker and won't work in the smaller needles. I don't know about 'roids. Anyway, you also learn a lot when you live with a couple of nurses...

      -m

    23. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      actually, diabetic needles [adccare.com] are much thinner - 28 to 30 gauge.

      And of course diabetics only know what needle gauge means if it's value is between 28 and 30. None of them could ever have any concept of what 19 gauge might mean.

    24. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by MaggieL · · Score: 1
      for good 'ol ease of use and stopping power nothin beats a .357 Magnum S&W

      .357 Mag is fine if you don't mind needing to reload more often and having a lower rate of fire; it's a revolver cartridge. There is a .357 Sig for autoloaders, as well as a .40 S&W. In fact, the .357 Sig is a .40 S&W case necked down to 9mm. .357 Sig has 80% more energy than a 147gr in 9mm.

      I'm quite happy with my 9mm carry piece; with pre-ban magazines I can carry it 13 rounds ready to go. If the 9mm isn't hitting hard enough, I'll just shoot twice.

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    25. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by mikeage · · Score: 2

      38 and .357's are exactly the same diameter (I often shoot 38 special ammo in my dad's .357 service revolver since it's cheaper). A 9mm is .355 to be precise, so technically, you could use it... but it wouldn't be a very wise idea.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    26. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nines loaded with FMJ suck at stopping power. I keep mine loaded with 115-grain Corbons, a hollowpoint round with a street record of 91 percent one-shot stops, with torso hits. That's better than most .45 ammo (though not better than the best .45).

      Ammo selection makes a bigger difference in stopping power than caliber. For real-world data on what different rounds actually do on the street, look at the book Stopping Power by Sanow and Marshall.

    27. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think if you check out an ammunition performance table you'll find that the standard .357 load has more velocity and energy than the standard 9mm load.
      Correct, which is why everyone uses .357 magnums as bear protection, because they have the highest "knock down power" (of anything you want to cary into the wilderness anyway). The idea is: wait until they are about 10 feet away, fire a hollow point into the head and try to get out of the way before a dead bear falls on you. You have to go for the brain, because a brown bear takes entirely too long to bleed to death, the .357 magnum is needed to get through the skull, and the hollow point helps your chances of removing enough of the brain to take them down.
    28. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by da5id · · Score: 1
      .357 Mag is fine if you don't mind needing to reload . . . I'm quite happy with my 9mm carry piece; with pre-ban magazines I can carry it 13 rounds ready to go. If the 9mm isn't hitting hard enough, I'll just shoot twice.
      As the saying goes, if you can't hit your target in six shots, what are you doing with a gun?
    29. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by MaggieL · · Score: 1
      As the saying goes, if you can't hit your target in six shots, what are you doing with a gun?

      Pay attention, dear.

      I said "if 9mm isn't hitting hard enough" not "if I spray 9mm all over the place without hitting my target" My point was two hits with 9mm carry more energy than one with a .357.

      Also, I might be dealing with heavy clothing, or body armor...after two or three shots to center-of-mass I might need to try a headshot. With a .357 Magnum six-shooter, I'd only have two left for the headshot, which are very tricky, especially under stress. Further, consider the possibility you have more than one target. I'm decently fast with a combat reload, but I'd prefer to not need to, and under ordinary circunstances I frequently don't have a spare mag handy.

      After all, it's not like I'm a gun nut or something. :-)

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    30. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by codeButcher · · Score: 1
      And while we're at it, isn't it high time, so long as we're zipping people around via particle beams, to find a fresher weapon than the .9mm pistol that spews all those hot, clinking cartridges all over the place?

      0.9 mm is about 0.035 inch (for the metric illiterate). Pretty small! Comes quite close to a particle beam....

      BTW, what's wrong with clinking cartridges? Imagine my joy when I first noticed a film that paid attention to the little details like that! (Patriot Games, I think it was).

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    31. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, if *I* were in a gang, I'd go pick up some Mosin Nagants (you know, the gun used in Enemy at the Gates). They run about 80$, ammo is cheaper than 9mm ammo, and the penetrating power is amazing. It can punch a hole in half inch steel from a hundred yards. Just FYI, it's a 7.62x54R cartridge. AK-47s use 7.62x39, so there's about an extra centimeter and a half of powder pushing that bullet out the chamber. Fun as hell to shoot, and if you're not wearing earplugs, you'll be deaf the next day.

      That may all be true...but i don't picture too many gangers running around with sniper rifles...or bolt action rifles...or anything else that they used in that movie (aside from the revolvers and SMGs and such)

    32. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by da5id · · Score: 1
      I said "if 9mm isn't hitting hard enough" not "if I spray 9mm all over the place without hitting my target" My point was two hits with 9mm carry more energy than one with a .357.
      I know what your point was, I was just making the observation that a lot of people dismiss revolvers as self defense/home defense weapons because of only having six shots. When in fact they would be the best weapon for this. When was the last time you heard of someone firing more than six shots in a self defense situation and coming out alive, and without a murder conviction?

      If I carried a gun (I don't) I would want a weapon that knocks down a threat in one shot, because each extra shot is a. more time (more likely to get yourself shot) and b. more likely to get you convicted for murder.

      btw, on the more than one target issue, the best solution in that situation is to surrender, because you will get shot (and if you must, I would think you would want to go with one shot per target, rather than more, to keep them from filling you with too many holes).

    33. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if you must, I would think you would want to go with one shot per target, rather than more, to keep them from filling you with too many holes

      I'm a bit confused by this, can you explain?

      Are you saying that your combatants are surely going to relieve you of your weapon and then empty it into you? If that is the case, it seems a moot point since this whole mini-thread is about stopping power and 4 shots (lets assume you're able to take one shot at each opponent) from a decently heavy revolver will kill you just as dead as 8 shots from a 9mm. I suppose one could say that it's easier to dodge 4 shots than 8, but if they're close enough to take your weapon, I think they've got you dead-bang.

      If you're suggesting that perhaps your attackers will be less willing to empty their weapons into you if you only have 6 shots to kill them in instead of 10, I don't see how ammo count should matter. I mean, if you are going to shoot me, i'm probably going to shoot at you until you are no longer a threat regardless of what you're pointing at me, be it a 22lr. a .38 or a .50 DE.

    34. Re:Point-nine-millimeter? by da5id · · Score: 1

      I meant you want to kill them as quickly as you can, ie 4 shots rather than 8, because while you are shooting at one of them, the rest are going to be pretty motivated to kill you. This is a stupid conversation, most people (ie not cops, and not "gangsters") will never get in this situation.

  4. Dear lord by UberOogie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    in this movie, the exotic and surprising spirituality of The Matrix

    ...And then he goes on to trash the lack of plot in The One.

    I now know that Katz lives in some alternate dimension unto his own.

    The Matrix plot, such as it was, was a paper-thin claptrap to frame the fusion of high technology and chop-socky, and chop socky still has better fight scenes. I honestly don't know why people like the Matrix so much. It was a bad, bad movie with some okay fight scenes.

    But even letting my personal opinion of the Matrix go for a moment--and not having seen The One-- calling the Matrix spiritual and plot-laden is ridiculous. How is "Programmer finds out that the world is an illusion and that he is humanity's digital messiah" so much deeper than "Man finds out that alternate dimension version of himself is killing all the others to steal their power"?

    At least he didn't talk about the affect of the One on globization, Columbine, and geeks in a post Sept. 11 world.

    --
    "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    1. Re:Dear lord by quartz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I now know that Katz lives in some alternate dimension unto his own

      So do you. All of us do. You don't really expect everybody to just accept YOUR opinion about things as the only valid one, do you? Then what's your point? Katz and other people saw something in the Matrix. You saw something else. That's how art works. Deal with it.

    2. Re:Dear lord by Mudhiker · · Score: 2

      The One plotline just kinda reminds me of the Highlander stories...

      --
      "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
    3. Re:Dear lord by s88 · · Score: 1

      its all about execution.
      do you honestly believe a one-liner can speak towards the quality of a movie?

    4. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a clue:
      http://www.suspensionofdisbelief.com/matrix/faq. ht ml

    5. Re:Dear lord by Forager · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Matrix plot, such as it was, was a paper-thin claptrap to frame the fusion of high technology and chop-socky, and chop socky still has better fight scenes. I honestly don't know why people like the Matrix so much. It was a bad, bad movie with some okay fight scenes.

      The problem with movies today is that every great plot has been done already. Shakespeare pretty much used them all up about 400 years ago. And even his pieces were just rehashes of older stories. As far as basic underlying plot lines go (everything else is just details, after all) there is no plot that hasn't been done before. Any plot you summarize in one sentence will sound familiar, because it has been done already, again and again and again.

      But the beauty of the Matrix lies in the details. Matrix is a work of cinematographic beauty; not only is the camera work amazing, but the way the special effects blend with the real footage. A lot of people I've talked to (film professors, movie buffs, Joe Sixpacks) agree that if we could do these things in the real world, this is how it would look. The way things were visually concieved for The Matrix made it beautiful.

      What The Matrix did, really, was show us the same old story in such a way as to fool us into thinking we hadn't seen it before. It took something old and tired and made it look good again. The fight choreography was perfect, the cinematography was superb, and the special effects were on a level we've never seen before.

      Admittedly, Katz is milking The Matrix for all its worth, but it really was a valuable movie. Of course, that's just my opinion.

      ~Forager

      --
      student of animation and the fine arts
    6. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Claptrap is claptrap, sonny, despite the babbling.

      -Rufus

    7. Re:Dear lord by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Not all great plots were used 400 hundreds years ago but I get your point (think fight club, usual suspects, Casablanca, Maltese Falcon and most of the film noir genre... ack, long term memory failing... need rum...)

      Yes, Matrix is valuable as the first of its kind. But it wasnt much of a movie except for its visuals/wire fu. I saw it once in theaters, then again in cable. But I wouldnt go out of my way to see it again.

      Oh yes... and think "The Good, the Bad and Ugly". Damn great movie (imho).

      --
      No sig
    8. Re:Dear lord by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      I now know that Katz lives in some alternate dimension unto his own.

      But unknown to the most people, Katz lives in multiple alternate dimensions, and this "evil Katz" in our dimension *must* be getting his super troll-writing powers by killing the good Katz's in other dimensions. It's up to last remaining super-Katz to face off in a fud-writing contest... TO THE DEATH.

    9. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Katz and other people saw something in the Matrix. You saw something else. That's how art works. Deal with it.

      Or maybe Katz saw green in further promoting the Matrix. You know how reviewers are, they're easily bought.

    10. Re:Dear lord by moongha · · Score: 1

      What The Matrix did, really, was show us the same old story in such a way as to fool us into thinking we hadn't seen it before. It took something old and tired and made it look good again. The fight choreography was perfect, the cinematography was superb, and the special effects were on a level we've never seen before.

      Spoken like someone who hasn't seen Fist of Legend.
    11. Re:Dear lord by Yosho · · Score: 1

      I now know that Katz lives in some alternate dimension unto his own.

      Wait, does this mean -- if you kill one Katz, the rest get stronger?!

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    12. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have to agree here. Especially with the last bit ;)

      I don't know what happened to movies as of late (yes they suck for the most part). All of the greatest movies ever made (IMHO) date to the 50s, 60s and even 70s. Somehow people knew how to do movies. As half the running time and plot didn't have to be dedicated to blowing shit up, you saw actual story and real characters.

      I just saw 'Escape from Alcatraz' (http://us.imdb.com/Title?0079116) on TV last night, and one of the things you notice (aside from stylish 70s clothing) are the little things. Like during the actual escape one of the characters trips (no, they're not all crisp jumps and kung-fu poses, they're REAL people), and they make plenty of noise during their escape, not just for a second or two to create momentary tension. They're real people, not some cut-out stereotypes. And even though they're hardened criminals, they somehow don't fit into either the good or the bad catagory. Oh yeah, and the ending isn't all neat and tidy, fuck do I hate how this is done in modern movies.

      In most pre-1980 movies every scene was necessary, every scene related to the plot and every scene advanced the plot. No soppy side-plots, no preaching (which modern movies seem to do WAY too often), no cheap tear-jerking. Yes, they had those too of course, not you really have to rack your brains to come up with a dozen really good, story driven, well made movies released recently (ie, during your lifetime).

      Give me a basic plot line of a modern movie, and I guarantee I can come up with a similar better movie done in 'technicolor' and fat mono.

    13. Re:Dear lord by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      The problem with movies today is that every great plot has been done already.

      Right, and as you say, these basic plots [3] and storylines [21 or 22, whatever it is] have been around since the first campfire. However, IMHO the cinematography can help the visual telling of the story, but the story still has to hold up. And here's a major point. I've probably seen more films and read more fantasy/sci-fi than 90% of slashdot readers and I watched The Matrix thinking the story was old, but there were some interesting use of new visual effects. Now compare my experience to that of a younger viewer, who has likely seen and read less than 10% of what I have and it would be more new to them. Good for them, they get more out of it than I do. Increasingly I'm off to the limited run films, stuff most have never heard of, but which wins Cannes, Sundance and other film festival awards for simply being done extremely well.

      Tricks like computer animation, rotating cameras, etc. become old fast.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    14. Re:Dear lord by usa35.com · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare pretty much used them all up about 400 years ago. And even his pieces were just rehashes of older stories.

      ...and...

      What The Matrix did, really, was show us the same old story in such a way as to fool us into thinking we hadn't seen it before. It took something old and tired and made it look good again. The fight choreography was perfect, the cinematography was superb, and the special effects were on a level we've never seen before.

      You've hit upon the true nature of storytelling, which most of The Matrix posts here have ignored - the stories being told have have been the same stories since stories started being told. They've always been extensions of the same story told in a new time and fashion with a few new twists. After enough revisions these same old stories become a totally new story or come full-circle into the same one again.

      Everyone needs a foundation for their ideas.

    15. Re:Dear lord by broody · · Score: 1

      Insightful my ass. RTFM.

      Start by searching for "Religious allegories" in this Matrix FAQ. Afterwards, slap yourself seven times with a clue stick.

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
    16. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YM all the clumsy, overblown, and trite religious allegories in the Matrix. HTH. HAND.

    17. Re:Dear lord by potaz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem with movies today is that every great plot has been done already.

      Fuck that. I'm sick of people saying everything that can be done has been done, and trying to make themselves seem like intellectuals in the process.

      I'm not sure how many plays Shakespeare wrote, but I'll be safe and say it's less than a thousand. And you're saying all the stories than can possibly be told were used up telling them? Bullshit. By that logic by the time you're a little over 2 1/2 years old (1000 days) you've probably seen everything that's going to happen in your life.

      If you say that there's a finite amount of story lines, list them, damn it! You can't make a grand claim like that and not back it up. Saying "Any plot you summarize in one sentence will sound familiar, because it has been done already, again and again and again" is stupid, because compressing anything to one sentence robs it of its nuances and trivializes it. Observe: "WWII was a war in which we dropped an atomic bomb (two, actually) and won the war; also: many people died."

      Perhaps every story that can be told in 100 words has been told, but that doesn't mean the rest of human creation is redundant.

    18. Re:Dear lord by jtdubs · · Score: 2

      Interestingly enough, there actually WAS a lot of deeper meaning to this movie. It was steeped full of Jet's Buddhist beliefs. It wasn't made prominenent, so if you wanted to ignore it it wouldn't be hard, but they were there.

      Examples:
      All the talk about the life force being in a circle (remember when he recites what his grandfathe said)

      When he switches from the closed-fist form to the open-fist form at the end. Soft overcomes hard.

      I can't think of any more off hand but there were more. I remember noticing them during the film.

      Secondly, I'm sick of people saying that Jet has *SOME* talent. He was the Chinese national martial arts champion (Wushu) 5 times before the age of 18, at which point he quit competing to do movies.

      Thirdly, can you name ANY people who were big stars in one country for years, and then moved somewhere else and remained a big star?

      I'd love to see Gene Hackman/Harrison Ford/Sam Jackson/whoever make it as a movie star in Hong Kong.

      Fourthly, have no misconceptions about this movie. It wasn't meant to be thought-provoking, atleast not much. It wasn't even marketed as such. It was marketed as "Jet Li beats himself up."

      So, duh, reviewers hated it. They were expecting Crouching Artsy Hidden Gravity. The people who actually saw it enjoyed it though. Cause the people who saw it saw it knowing what kind of movie it was. The two theaters I've seen it in have been somewhat full of people and almost all of them left very pleased with the result. I recall one black fellow commenting that it was, "off the hook." :-)

      Anyway, I loved it. I"m seeing it again today. Have fun,

      Justin Dubs

    19. Re:Dear lord by locrian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Fist of Legend has excellent fight choreography, especially Chen Zen(Jet Li)'s fight with Funokochi Fumio. We can't forget about the fight seen inside the Japanese Compound either. I actually think that Twin Warriors is a better film martial-arts wise, but both are very good... on the subject of storylines, however, keep in mind that Fist of Legend is just a remake of Bruce Lee's "The Chinese Connection"... granted, Jet Li does a better job at it :)

      --
      A flute with no holes is not a flute.
    20. Re:Dear lord by tru+junglist · · Score: 0

      Dear lord indeed...
      I find it sad that there is such widespread condemnation for the Matrix, as is particularly well illustrated in your comment. For the most part, it seems that people are afraid to say it is a good movie, perhaps because of the subject matter/high amount of special effects/martial arts/the list goes on...
      The Matrix is a good, very intelligent movie. For one thing, it offers one of the most seamless interpretations of Descartian philosophy that cinema has offered us in the last couple of years (for those of you unfamiliar with Descartes, one of his more popular "philosophies" was the "I think therefore I am", beautifully dealt with throughout the movie - there is no spoon. Read up a little of his work if you have the time, it's well worth it). I'm tired, but the list goes on - I just find it amazing the the symbolism in the Matrix is so underestimated (or maybe it is the sad reality that moviegoers truly don't bother thinking about the films they watch any more). Anyhow, I am not a Matrix fanatic, I just happens to be a movie fanatic that thinks the Matrix is a great film, and that it does not deserve the amount of bashing that it gets.
      -atticus

      --
      jungle is massive
    21. Re:Dear lord by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      The problem with movies today is that every great plot has been done already. Shakespeare pretty much used them all up about 400 years ago.

      Yes, but you can change the details. Shakespeare never did time travel. "Should I, or should I not kill the man who murdered my father" takes on whole new meaning when the "I" is a robot.

    22. Re:Dear lord by UberOogie · · Score: 2
      Start by searching for "Religious allegories"... blah blah

      Ya-huh. If you like the pretty eye candy, you can like the pretty eye candy.

      But, come on.

      Some fanwank writes up a document, and that makes it true?

      There's that sub of people writing overblown reviews of Family Circus books at Amazon.

      It doesn't make it true, either.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    23. Re:Dear lord by Nerds · · Score: 2

      Or maybe "should I, or should I wioll haven not kill the man...". Or "willan-have killed"? Well, I'm not sure, I never even got to the future semiconditionally modified subinverted plagal past subjunctive intentional...

      --
      My other .sig is 'The Art of Computer Programming'
    24. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading once that there are only two different stories; "A stranger comes to town" and "A young man goes on a journey." Everything else is, supposedly, a variation on one or the other.

    25. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I now know that Katz lives in some alternate dimension unto his own.

      Dear god, let's hope ours doesn't kill all the other JonKatzes and become more powerful!!!

    26. Re:Dear lord by hardburn · · Score: 1

      I just saw "The One" last night with some freinds. I went into it expecting to watch a good fight. I still think it sucked because it lacked any good style that was seen in "Iron Monkey" or "The Matrix". My freinds felt the same way.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    27. Re:Dear lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for interjecting some rationality in this discussion. For the last year, this is what /. has become. Some poster trots out a cliche, offers no evidence to back up the cliche, disappears from the conversation, and gets modded up to +5 insightful.

      You use to read +5 and people would give you insights or behind the scenes details. Now this is what you have:

      +5 Insert cliche
      +4 _______ Rulez
      +3 A bunch of links pulled off google
      +2 Bad and inappropriate cliches by the Karma whores who get to +5 by nailing a cliche and use their posting bonus
      +1, 0 Real discussion
      -1 Crapflooders and some real discussion that offers a non-groupthink point of view.

      I guess any post that provides information or evidence to support a position is too long for the moderators to read. How "Every story has already been written gets insightful" to +5 is amazing.

    28. Re:Dear lord by jtdubs · · Score: 2

      This was not a traditional chinese movie, so you shouldn't have expected classic chinese styles throughout the whole length.

      However, at the end, while the two Jet's are facing off in that factory, if you were paying attention you should have noticed the most beautiful execution of two very complicated forms of Kung Fu.

      Gabe (Good Jet), was practicing Bagua Zhang, an open-fist form practiced by walking in circles with open hands. His technique in this form was absolutely beautiful and relies on circular, snake-like movements.

      Yulaw (Bad Jet), was practicing Xing Yi Quan, a closed-fist form practiced sometimes by inmates in old chinese prisons and with an emphasis on straight, fast movements. His technique in this art was also absolutely breaktaking.

      However, I probably only enjoyed it because of a very strong appreciation of the martial arts involved. It's probably true that, if I had been in your shoes, I would have felt the same way you did.

      I would like to refute that The Matrix had ANY style at all to it. It had great camera work, sure, but absoltely NO good martial arts style as none of those involved know martial arts. The subtleties of the arts involved can't be taught during a month of training. It was, however, a damned entertaining movie, which may not be true of The One.

      I guess I'm just rambling at this point. Conclusion: I understand how you feel, but respectfully disagree. Have a good day,

      Justin Dubs

    29. Re:Dear lord by gulped · · Score: 1

      Twin Warriors? the movie where Jet Li goes off and bounces on people--upside down--like a pogo stick? The one where people can run up a spear aimed at them? The movie where you can actually see the cables on people's backs when they jump?
      This, a better martial arts movie?
      You gotta be kidding me.

    30. Re:Dear lord by raptor21 · · Score: 1
      "calling the Matrix spiritual and plot-laden is ridiculous. How is "Programmer finds out that the world is an illusion and that he is humanity's digital messiah" so much deeper than "Man finds out that alternate dimension version of himself is killing all the others to steal their power"?"


      The Matrix

      The concept that the world is and illusion is the fundamental belief of Hinduism and Buddhism. Therefore teh matrix draws parallels to those religions and the concept of a messiah is not new to Judaism, christianity or Islam therefore drwing parallels to those religions. Jesus was a carpenter, Mohhamad was a shepard and neo is a programmer. See any similarities here.

      The one ( haven't seen it but read the reviews)

      Talks about 124 multiverses and killing one person in each of the multiverses distributes the power of that person to his parallels in the others. So if the bad jet li kills all 123 of his clones he becomes the one and as strong as 123 men.

      Need I say more. That the matrix was a good movie that gave the laymen insite into philosophical topics that have baffled philosophers for centuries. The One on the other hand is a bunch of SCi-Fi garbage with no basis either in theology, philosophy or science.
  5. what else would you suspect by mrbkap · · Score: 1

    I went to see Kiss of the Dragon and got exactly what I expected from a Jet Li martial arts film: a lot of blood, not a lot of plot, and a girl who 'loves' him in the end. The only two things that made that movie bearable for me was the fact that he had some humorus lines, and the fact that it was funny laughing at the girls next to me that would scream when he took off his shirt. If these movies are anything like Kiss then I've seen them already. Most of these movies seem to have the same plot twists anyway. And...let me guess...the final fight: it seems the good Jet Li will lose, before he comes back with some other-worldly strength and starts kicking ass again. I knew it. I've 'seen' it.

    --
    -mrbkap
    1. Re:what else would you suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tell me about it.

      Crouching Tiger was total bollocks too. I never quite understood why the critics and public seemed to like that unrealistic flying and boring, predictable plot.

  6. Forget the Matrix... by dbolger · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and forget Jet Li. This is far more entertaining :)

  7. immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In short, if you really like Jet Li, go see it, but try to sneak in.

    How old are you, 15? So if a movie is really not worth paying for, but you want to see it, someone should sneak in? This just reinforces the view that open-source types want everything without paying for it.

    Do you feel this way about shoplifting too?

    Please cut this crap out..

    1. Re:immature and stupid by iamsure · · Score: 0, Troll

      And replying to site founders on their site as an AC is .. Noble?

      Get a grip troll..

      People do sneak in to movies to avoid paying for them. Sorry he didnt say "download the DivX" instead, mollifying your pitiful moral outrage over sneaking into a movie..

    2. Re:immature and stupid by dbug78 · · Score: 1
      open-source types want everything without paying for it
      you say that like it's a bad thing.
    3. Re:immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lose the holier-than-thou attitude. It has no place here because everyone can see through you for the hypocrite that you are.

    4. Re:immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      calling someone troll is the lamest comeback for not having any counter-argument. Responding as AC has nothing with being noble, and nobody has claimed so.

      I was just pointing out how lame it is for a guy who is probably over 30 adocating sneaking in, when he (probably) has a job and has his own money to pay for it.

      It's not like he's entitled to see the movie for free.

    5. Re:immature and stupid by s88 · · Score: 1

      you sir...are a moron.

    6. Re:immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iamsure is just one of the many /. geeks who condone pirating Windows 9X/NT/2000/XP because it's not worth paying for.

    7. Re:immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katz already knows that most of his audience are angry 15-year olds anyway. I'm guessing that's why he writes at their level too. Dumbass.

    8. Re:immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT IM NOT STEALING ANYTHING WHEN I SNEAK IT, DO I? i DONT WALK AWAY WITH ANYTHING, AND THE THEARTRE doesnt lose anything either

    9. Re:immature and stupid by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      BUT IM NOT STEALING ANYTHING WHEN I SNEAK IT, DO I?

      The crime is not theft in this case, no. It's trespassing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:immature and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all started when Katz "illegaly" skipped Jurassic Park 3 and went to see some other movie saying it was justified since he paid for Jurassic Park 3.
      He went downhill from there.

    11. Re:immature and stupid by dysjunct · · Score: 1
      How old are you, 15? So if a movie is really not worth paying for, but you want to see it, someone should sneak in? This just reinforces the view that open-source types want everything without paying for it.

      You should sneak into movies that you want to see, not because you want something without paying for it, but to make up for all the times that Hollywood has tricked you into paying for the same recycled crap. Very few industries use such blatantly false advertising, and even the most discerning moviegoer gets suckered on occasion by the cold, heartless maggots who decide upon the latest bilge to disguise as entertainment. Lex talionis works works for me: They rip me off, I rip them off.

      I personally recommend How To Sneak Into The Movies for those interested in practical techniques.

    12. Re:immature and stupid by sid_vicious · · Score: 1

      How old are you, 15? So if a movie is really not worth paying for, but you want to see it, someone should sneak in?

      Blargh - at the price of $9.50 a person ($19.00 for my girlfriend and I), though I haven't done it, I can't say the thought hasn't crossed my mind. And that's not $19 to sit in a nice, THX-super surround sound 3D stereo stadium seating back-massaging theatre, either. The theatres around us suck.

      So, rather than sneak in I've just quit going to all but the absolutely necessary movies (Castaway and Final Fantasy were the last two).

      I'm not 17 anymore - I just don't have that kind of disposable income.

      --
      If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
  8. Yes, much better that "Crouching Sitting Whatever. by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    Iron Monkey was the best Kung Fu movie that I have seen in the theater.

    Unlike, the crouching animals movie, this one had a plot that worked, and some real fight moves (in addition to many laughable ones).

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Re:Yes, much better that "Crouching Sitting Whatev by locrian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the "plot" to Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, is based on an old Chinese tale. Granted, I'm sure things got spiced up here and there for the big screen, but it was an excellent movie.
    And c'mon guys... Jet Li has done worse movies than "The One"... anyone remember "Martial Arts of Shaolin"? :)

    --

    --
    A flute with no holes is not a flute.
  11. Kiss the Dragon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I haven't seen "The One" yet, I was hoping to see something good about it. I thought "Romeo Must Die" was good, with some excellent music, fights, a sweet chase scene, and Aaliyah (what can I say?).

    On the other hand, I saw "kiss the Dragon" earlier this summer and I thought it sucked. Ordinarily, I like both Luc Besson and Jet Li, but this movie was a shame for both of them. Maybe Besson should have directed it instead of just (co)writing it.

  12. Inconsistancy (possible spoiler) by kninja · · Score: 2, Informative
    Well katz I agree. The movie was not that great. The matrix had much more meaning and more consistancy.


    The real problem I had with this movie is that in order for the main bad guy to get stronger, he had to kill everyone.


    What happens when everyone else in the other parallel universes dies? Then the last person becomes the one. This is inconsistant (unless everyone dies together and this was disproven early on in the movie). I think it made me realize that it was a bunch of semi-cool fight scenes (I think the first one is the best and it goes downhill from there)strung together.


    The inconsistancy made this movie very dissatisfying, and I hope that Jet Li learns from his mistake.

    1. Re:Inconsistancy (possible spoiler) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unless there's another of you present in that universe when you die. =Then= the energy gets redistributed to all the remaining yous.

      No, that doesn't make sense, I know, but it gets around the "last man standing" issue.

  13. Get your movies straight. by DJ+Wipeout · · Score: 2, Funny

    But The One (even the title is a ripoff from The Matrix)....

    Um, don't you mean Highlander?

    Why are you reviewing movies for a geek site if you can't even draw parallels correctly? (no pun intended...oh wait)

  14. So another title could have been by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crouching Matrix, Hidden Plotline?

    Sounds like that sums it up perfectly.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  15. More Information? by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought Neo was The One. Anyway, the movie is getting average ratings from papers across the globe. Here they are if you'd like a second opinion:

    Chicago Tribune: 3 stars

    Detroit Free Press: 1 star

    E! Online: C-

    Entertainment Weekly: C-

    Did you know that the movie was originally going to star Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson of WWF fame?

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    1. Re:More Information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I thought Neo was The One.

      No, The Highlander is The One.

    2. Re:More Information? by infiniti99 · · Score: 2

      You forgot Roger Ebert!

      Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5 stars

  16. The Hollywood Effect by jhol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's really a shame that Jet Li has gone hollywood.

    The chinese movies he has made are all, with few exceptions, excellent. The fighting is astonishing and Jet Li is truly one of the absolute best martial arts actors out there. Just watch Fist of Legend and you'll see. That movie made me into a Jet Li-fan, and the choreographer is the same who did choreography for The Matrix.

    But the hollywood effect on Jet Li's movies is terrible. Firstly because Jet Li is taken out of his habitat; he only speaks little English, let him speak Chinese in the movies damnit. Secondly because the fighting scenes are created into some strange blur, and it's freakin' impossible to see anything! Jet Li is incredible, but the fighting scenes are made into some camera-frenzy. If you watch Fist of Legend there are lengthy fighting scenes that are so good you want to see them over and over again, provided you are a kung fu-fan of course, and it's actually possible to appreciate their skills.

    The camera effects were necessary on actors in The Matrix, since they need them. Jet Li does not.

    1. Re:The Hollywood Effect by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

      I agree with you.

      For some reason, Jet Li's fights, on Hollywood, can't achieve the same beauty they do on Chinese movies.

      The movie making process is a lot different in Hollywood than in China. I think that's the problem.

      By the way, photography direction for fight scenes on Hollywood movies have always been total crap. Hollywood doesn't knows how to film fights. You never understand what's going on, you can't see the action....... unlike Chinese movies, you get to see every move in it's great beautie.

      Even Jackie Chan's movies filmed in China totally shadow his work on Hollywood.

      Conspiracy theory: hollywood wants to kill Chinese actors and martial arts on USA in it's beginning, so they can keep filming bar fights with chairs breaking and bottles breaking in the head of someone.

    2. Re:The Hollywood Effect by Pope · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But the hollywood effect on Jet Li's movies is terrible

      The Hollywood Effect took its toll on Chinese directors first.
      Rule #1: your first movie has to be with Van Damme, then we can talk. Though I gotta say, Hard Target was way better than Broken Arrow IMO because they kept the hokum to a minimum and Lance Henrikson rules! :)

      Tsui Hark was so disgusted with Hollywood he went back to Hong Kong and made one of the most fantastic HK action films in years, Time and Tide. Obviously it's better if you see it in the theatre because the action moves so fast in places it's hard to keep up, but if you like HK action by all means rent it.

      Jet Li is technically excellent, but he lacks the humanity that Jeckie Chan brings to his characters. It helps that hald the time Jackie plays a fool most of the time :) Hell, Iron Monkey had more likeable characters.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:The Hollywood Effect by davmct · · Score: 0

      Jet Li is now just a kung-fu whore. He'll kick anyone's ass for the right money. I'm surprised there isn't an item on eBay you can bid to get your ass kicked by him.

    4. Re:The Hollywood Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Conspiracy theory: hollywood wants to kill Chinese actors and martial arts on USA in it's beginning, so they can keep filming bar fights with chairs breaking and bottles breaking in the head of someone.

      That's not a conspiracy, that's a fact. Let's look at the countless times Hollywood ruined Bruce Lee's life. First, the original _Kung Fu_ had Bruce set to play the leading role as a Shaolin monk. Before filming the first season, Hollywood execs replaced him with Caradine (a white guy). This pissed Bruce off to no end. Another, throughout the taping of _The Green Hornet_, Hollywood execs would attempt to get Bruce to deliberately lose fights just to have others look good (case in point, the cross-over with the original Batman series). After becoming a box office success in Hong Kong, Hollywood saw the profits from making a Bruce Lee film and got him to star in _Enter the Dragon_, among others. As you know, Bruce later dies of mysterious circumstances, leaving his son Brandon to follow his footsteps. Some of you familiar with Brandon's work know about _Big Trouble in Little Tokyo_ and other films, especially _The Crow_. And some of you know about how Brandon died while filming a scene in _The Crow_. If you want a real conspiracy, you'd look at the connection of Brandon's death to how Hollywood presistently tried to ruin Bruce's career.

    5. Re:The Hollywood Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I forgot to add that I'd sure love to have Bruce knock off the heads of the execs of Hollywood, the MPAA, and the RIAA with flying kicks. I wouldn't mind paying $10 to go see a film about that!

    6. Re:The Hollywood Effect by nil_null · · Score: 1

      True, Jet Li has some skill, Fist of Legend is amazing. The preview of The One made the fighting look like something out of a video game to me. I'm still a sucker for that kind of camera work, though.

    7. Re:The Hollywood Effect by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The chinese movies he has made are all, with few exceptions, excellent."

      I disagree. Even if you are talking about just the martial action, he's had some bombs. I'll just mention the films I have actually seen.

      Shaolin Temple. Slow. But it is a mainland production with all that entails (nice sets but threadbare plot, about Shaw Brothers in terms of production value.) Seen once.

      Dragon Fight. Horrible characterization and even thinner plot. Stephen Chow before he was funny. Seen once.

      Swordsman 2: Amazing action (if you can stand obvious wire-fu) but what in the world is going on? And how many times must I hear the sad drinking song? Seen 3 times.

      Deadly China Hero. Wong Jing parody of OUATIC when Li decided not to do Wong Fei Hung. After this horrible thing (especially when he wears the chicken outfit to defeat the centipede group) he wisely? went back to OUATIC. Seen 2-3 times.

      Bodyguard from Beijing. Rip off of "The Bodyguard" only this time Li's a mainland professional government agent. Predictable storyline nd medocre acting. Only saving gracce was the end fight scene with the natural gas spewing. Seen 2 times.

      High Risk. Highlights of this Wong Jing film isn't Jet, it's Jackie Cheung as the Jackie Chan inspired numbnut. Seen 3-4 times.

      Other Bad films: My father is a Hero, Fist of Legend (despite the technical brilliance the hackneyed relationship with a Japanese gf and her uncle seems too revisionist for my taste) and Black Mask.

      Jet's best films are Once Upon a Time in China 2 and 3, Hitman (good acting all around and a decent storyline) and Fong Sai-Yuk 1 and 2 (again if you like wire-fu). These mix some decent characters, humor and action with good technical camera work and set pieces.

      "the choreographer is the same who did choreography for The Matrix."

      Yuen Woo Ping can make nearly anybody look good. He knows how to film shots and realizes that Jet Li's main martial arts style, Wu Shu, looks great on film even though it may not be best art for really punishing fights. Maybe that's why Ping's next hoped for prodigy Donnie Yen was also great in Wu Shu. Too bad Donnie is churning out his own stuff now.

      Also look for work by Corey Yuen. He is easily on par with Woon Ping. You can check out Woo Ping on camera in Sammo Hung's IMHO best film, Eastern Condors.

      "But the hollywood effect on Jet Li's movies is terrible."

      I agree with most of what you say. But the problem with Hollywood is not only that Chinese emigres suffer, but they've had a horrible effect on the HK film industry. Instead of action dramas that successfully fused great acting, good storylines and innovative action sequences of the mid-to-late 90s, you see claptrap like Gen X Cops, Time and Tide, and the remake/sequel of Zu Mountain. These films use lowest common denominator plots, beautiful and successful pop stars and throw in lots of special effects to try to hide horrible or confusing storylines and threadbare character development.

      I can understand Hollywood's paint by numbers approach because Hollywood is run by corporate beancounters. HK has fallen into the same trap going for glitz over substance and thinking special efects will draw audiences into movies we've seen done better a million times before.

      What used to endear me to HK films was the hard work and actual physical demands placed upon the actors and produciton staff. These days they just generate digital effects to make the actors look like they are doing something. Yeah, the old Shaw Bros Wu Xia Pan films had lots of shots with no camera movement and crazy closeups, but to get all that action in one shot is amazing.

      Save your money and go buy Shaolin Soccer. It uses special effects to enhance a good storyline with great acting and lots of actually funny gags. And just so you know the guy *doesn't* get the girl at the end.

      Sorry for drifting.

    8. Re:The Hollywood Effect by nomadic · · Score: 2



      unlike Chinese movies, you get to see every move in it's great beautie.


      Not necessarily. Seemed like 99% of the action in Once Upon a Time in China 2 took place off screen. Tried to introduce a friend to Jet Li with that movie, but it was so bad it didn't work.

  17. This film was a stinker [SPOILER] by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Warning: Possible Spoilage

    This film borrowed elements from other films willy-nilly, and had few original parts.

    The fight scene at the factory was clearly ripped off from Streeth Fighter (or at least the genre). "LAW vs. Law" was about as exciting as watching an arcade game. All we needed were health meter bars :)

    The premise was flawed: if an alternate me dies, and I am made stronger even though I did not kill him, then at some point I'm going to be an old man in some universe, all my alts are going to be dead, and I'm going to be God.

    The ending leaves both Laws alive. What happens when one of them dies? The other becomes God? Pshaw. I found it very hard to suspend my disbelief on this one.

    1. Re:This film was a stinker [SPOILER] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea was that the power only gets distributed if an alternate Law is killed by another Law, not if one just dies. This was mentioned very quickly if I remember right.

    2. Re:This film was a stinker [SPOILER] by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

      But an equal amount of power gets distributed to EVERY Law in every universe? It just doesn't make sense.

  18. Metric System? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    .9mm? That's a mighty small calibre. When are you idiotic Americans going to accept that Metric is just more useful and logical? At that time, you might also consider abandoning your ridiculous paper sizes too.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:Metric System? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will NOT let Communism into my printer! A4? Sounds like KGB to me!

    2. Re:Metric System? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Base 12 is actually a more efficient system in terms of factors than metric. Neither are anywhere as useful as balanced ternary; I wonder when we're going to switch to that?

    3. Re:Metric System? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When are you idiotic Americans going to accept that Metric is just more useful and logical?

      Never fuck head, because it isn't.

  19. Plot hole? by CmdrSanity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the main issures that nagged me while watching The One:
    Jet Li's power increases because he kills the Jet Lis from other dimensions. Eventually there will be only one Jet Li left and he is supposed to have god-like power. But why is this so special? Unless all the copies of a person in all the dufferent universes simultaneously die, there will be exactly one copy at some point. Natural\accidental\other types of death will pick off the copies one by one. So, there should be god-like people popping up all over the place.
    /end nitpick

    1. Re:Plot hole? by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      But given the ammount of time it would take for all the copies to die off you would only have an army of super strong old people.

      "Night of the Living Geriatric Jet Lis"

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:Plot hole? by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Natalie Portman, Linus Torvalds, Cowboy Neal - Obviously, these are people who have died off in all other dimensions! Be glad you live in this one!

      --
      Why?
    3. Re:Plot hole? by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Who knows?
      Perhaps you have to be close to your dying copy in order to inherit the energy, in a Highlander rip-off sense.

    4. Re:Plot hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely that for the energy to be transferred, one of your "doubles" has to be nearby (i.e. in the same universe). When normal people die, nothing happens, unless their double from another universe happens to be there.

    5. Re:Plot hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mentioned at some point that the power gets distributed when you kill one of your alternate selves, so I assume that if you die of natural causes or any other way that doesn't involve you being killed by your alternate self, the power doesn't get distributed.

  20. Films have been so bad, the last year... by CrayBeast · · Score: 2

    It's almost as if Hollywood has completely given up. For at least the last year, mainstream films from the US have been really, really unimaginative and boring. Either they are unfunny sequels to shlock comedies, repetitive disaster movies or dull feel-good films for kids.

    The only decent films making it to the screen these days are lesser-known alternative flicks from Australia or the UK.

    God help us when Hollywood starts making films about the WTC attacks, and subsequent wars

    1. Re:Films have been so bad, the last year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hollywood starts making films about the WTC attack

      Well, they've already decided not to endorse scripts in which the governmental organizations like FBI, CIA or NSA are in evil roles.

      Talk about propaganda...

    2. Re:Films have been so bad, the last year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about 'fight club'; I though that was good. And I don't think that there's going to be any film about the WTC attacks for a long long time, since Americans generally do not like to see faillure portrayed (which is something that is going to be only more prevalent as this 'war on terrorism' evolves into the next VietNam).

  21. It's a fun movie... by chris_martin · · Score: 1

    I had no problems with the camera work. That is to say, that I didn't come out of the movie thinking about it. The other people in the theater enjoyed it, as did I. The special effects are cool and the speed-up/slow-mo stuff is pretty neat to watch, though done a bit too many times. As for the quote mentioned in the review, "There can be only one..." I think I was the only one in the theater to bust out laughing, it had to be a joke/hommage. I wish they would have changed the ending. It had so much of a chance, but it's an american film, what can ya do. I was dissapointed in Jason Statham. He shouldn't have tried a different accent. He's great in Lock Stock and in Snatch, but in The One, sometimes he's got a texas accent, sometimes, it's back to brit, it was odd really. So, it's a fun fight flick, though yes, the plot is thin, but not any worse than every other fight flick out there, and at least it's not a the bad guy killed my best friend/wife/dog/whatever from the 80's. As for the comparisions to Jackie Chan's films, different thing all together really, IMHO. JC's stuff is ment to be funny, with action/kung-fu, etc. Movies like this are ment to be fun (not funny) action movies. And neither of them are ment to be world changing plot/dialog based films.

    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
  22. It's not .9mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it, 0.9 mm is not the bullet size.

    It's 9 mm

    And if you miss this minor detail by 10 times, how can we trust you on anything else ?

  23. Katz blows it again. by billcopc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh Jon, Jonny Jonboy, stop trying to impress people with your over-analysis and mis-facts. "The One" is a quick & dirty Jet Li movie, and like all Jet Li movies, it's all about less plot and more action, of which there is plenty in this flick. Slow-motion scenes, wall-jumping and anti-gravity stunts are Jet Li's trademark. That's how it was in Black Mask & Romeo Must Die, The One is no different. He still kicks ass and he still looks like a kung fu heroin addict, and that just happens to look pretty darned cool on a big screen.

    Give it a break.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Katz blows it again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what katz was going after. This is everything I had hoped for and expected from this Jet Li movie. I've been watching them for years and years (in chinese with korean subtitles from the neighborhood korean grocery).

      Not one person walked out of my local theater but they were excited about the film. (I listened to them as they walked out).

      The problem is people think they have to be movie Critics, rather than reviewers. Reviewers can enjoy a film for what it is... critics feel they haven't contributed unless they have torn something down.

      Uncle Stinky

  24. C'mon guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This movie was worth seeing just to hear jet li say "I am no one's Bitch! You are all my Bitches!"

  25. wtf by carm$y$ · · Score: 1

    [...] commonplace they're tiresome.

    I read that as "commonplace as threesomes"... time to get that caffeine shot...

    --
    -- No sig today
  26. Re:Get your movies straight. - he did.. by iamsure · · Score: 1

    Maybe you arent geeky enough. In the Matrix, Morpheus calls Neo "The One" numerous times, alluding to an all powerful entity that can change the universe.

    Perfect parrallel to Jet Li's "The One" in my humble opinion..

    And of course, yes, they also used plot devices (kill all others and become insanely powerful) from Highlander.

  27. Hell Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The matrix was a cool flick, but about as spiritual as a toaster. I'm so sick of people hype-ing this movie like it's some sort of important symbol of our times. It's well executed, but when you come down to it the plot is cheesy as hell, and based on an absurd premise (generating power from people, wtf?).

    1. Re:Hell Yeah by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      As I heard it, the plot originally had them using humans as processors, but it was felt that would be too much for people to grasp.

    2. Re:Hell Yeah by Platypii · · Score: 1

      that would actually make sense..... i always had a problem with the battery thing

  28. Total Jet Li'ness by Omega+Prime · · Score: 0

    Judging by whats been said:

    Wouldn't it be almost impossible for evil Jet li to kill the good Jet li?

    If everytime one of the 125 li's die the power becomes more concentrated in those that remain, that said shouldn't they have equal power?!?

    Who decided that there are only 125 universes!! Kinda arbitrary

    --
    "We deal in lead" - Roland of Gilead
    1. Re:Total Jet Li'ness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it wouldn't be any more of a challenge than for one person of regular strength to kill any other person of regular strength..

  29. ....and this and this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here are the other two zhu_zhq works: http://www.seriousbird.com/tuzzf/

  30. Mass audiences by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    non-stop ripoffs of the martial arts/ balletic combat sequences Neo brought to the big screen for the mass audience.

    Well, I was watching Jet Li movies long before the Matrix came out, and I thought that it was a total rip-off of his movies.
    Didn't stop me from liking it, and I'm guessing it won't stop me from liking The One either.

    Free your mind dude.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  31. Unstoppable force versus immovable object. by big.ears · · Score: 4, Funny

    I now know which one wins. When the unstoppable force that is a ./ reader's love for The Matrix meets the immovable object that is a ./ reader's hatred for John Katz, it looks like the unstoppable force gets thwarted.

  32. Katz is a martial arts movie ignorant! by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

    Jet Li's movies can't be a ripoff of the Matrix. Why? Because the Matrix is a ripoff of all the work Jet Li has been doing since 1980.

    All the stuff I saw in the Matrix, I have already seen on previous Jet Li's work.

    Altough the fight scenes in the matrix were good, they don't come close to the things you see on movies like Fong Sai Youk or Tai Chi Master.

    The Matrix didn't bring balletic martial arts sequences to the masses, it brought them to US audience. Did you know, Katz, that Asia is bigger than USA, and that Jet Li is one of the most famous artist in Asia?
    Now I understand why a lot of people has a problem with Katz.

    1. Re:Katz is a martial arts movie ignorant! by ect0plasm · · Score: 1

      werd is bond,
      deadly china hero was the shit.
      now if only i know the 3 or 4 other titles it goes under!

      -expecting a good plot in a kungfu flick is expecting a lot..

    2. Re:Katz is a martial arts movie ignorant! by fialar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Katz needs to do more research before spouting.
      I like when Jet Li finds his "center" in the movie.
      He starts doing Tai-Chi and turns bad Jet Li's
      moves against himself. This reminds me of the end
      scene in Tai Chi Master!! :)

      Makes me want to go back and start practicing my
      36 move competition form (Yang style) again.

      -fialar

  33. Jon... by Knunov · · Score: 0, Troll

    Shut up.

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
    1. Re:Jon... by autocracy · · Score: 3, Funny

      YES! A 2 liner from a guy with goatse.cx listed as his home page totally dissing John Katz gets modded up to 4 (at the time of this post, I bet he's going for 5)! And here's the kicker - it's insightful! I'll bet this one will even pass on M2. Take a hint folks - we want Katz gone!

      --
      SIG: HUP
    2. Re:Jon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all part of the, "I have moderator points, I must use them now" syndrome. Seriously, what do you expect to happen when you take moderator points away from people after a couple days or so? 90% of the moderation to a story gets done in the first hour it seems.. So all the retards post stuff, get moderated, meanwhile the intelligent people come later, post the good stuff, but oh, too late, everyone else has moved on to the next story. We need a new moderation choice, -5 Katz bashing. Seriously, I realize you people hate Katz, but can you fucking complain somewhere else so we can talk about the movie?

    3. Re:Jon... by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like you don't know that you can actually turn katz off in the user preferences. I'm not kidding.

      I have cmdrtaco turned off, and soon to add katz to that list.

    4. Re:Jon... by TooTallFourThinking · · Score: 1

      I agree. These two posts are the funniest things I have read on Slashdot in a while. (They brought tears to me eyes!)

      This goes to prove, less is more. Using that logic, I probably should have shut up a couple of sentences ago...

    5. Re:Jon... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I admit, I'm one of the people that modded it up.

      I was thinking of modding it 'funny', but it was WAY more humorous to have it as 'insightful'. What I'm impressed with is that it was modded back DOWN to 1.

    6. Re:Jon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Filtering Katz doesn't solve the problem. His polarizing work tends to draw an angry and angst ridden crowd, that fills up other forums. Eventually those people get moderator points as well. That's why you browse at +5 and you get a bunch of "Linux Rulez" type posts.

      If you think this is a troll, go read the interview with Linus forum. How many are +5 that say, "This is why Linus is so cool." then spout a bunch of garbage not related to the interview.

      If you want a critical discussion of the interview you have to drop down to level 1, and filter though lots of garbage.

      Now if you have gone to Slashdot editor's school, you'll probably reply, "That's how /. is, you won't change it." Then, you will get a bunch of replies that explain how /. has changed and suggestions for improvement. A couple of people will be offended and say they will leave. Then you should reply "See ya." Think it doesn't happen. Go check out /. Jaime's responses in the latest Windows XP forum.

  34. What did u expect when even the title is a rip-off by Caudipteryx · · Score: 1

    If u go see a movie where even the title is a rip-off expecting a clever, original plot and dialogue, perhaps u deserve to be disappointed? Elvis movies were made as excuses for Elvis to sing and gyrate his pelvis. Fred Astaire movies were made as excuses for Fred Astaire to dance, dance, dance. So Jet Li movies are excuses for him to kick and leap and for his audiences for him watch him to do just those things ... which he does very well. Nothing more.

  35. Heard Jackie, and Jet are teaming up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't see anyone mention this, and it's not completely off topic. Last night on some entertainment tonight knock off they said Jet, and Jackie are going to be doing a movie together. No word on the name of the film, but I'm sure it will include lots of kicking and punching. Filming is suppose to start in January.

  36. I want to shoot john katz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With two 9mm's, well doing a back flip.

    I swear, this just is walking proof that quality doesn't count in net journalism..

    Still, I guess you would need a skin so thick you lived in another universe just to live with the constant critism without killing yourself (do it!).

  37. Back in the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I used to be a Tae Kwon Do instructor (this was many inches of waistline ago), we used to dodge bullets all the time. Personally, my favorite part was all that flying stuff. Lots of fun. ;^)

  38. W00t w00t!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoo hoo! first post! First frickin' post, guys. Munch on that!

    Whoa. WTF? Goddamn netlag. Will you look at that ping? Gotta get me a cable modem.

    1. Re:W00t w00t!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...how do you expect to frag anyone when your "first post" ends up some 60-something messages after the fact?

    2. Re:W00t w00t!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you penis-envy-having wanker. If my 300bps modem doesn't say "I've got a huge dick," then I guess nothing will.

  39. Seeing double by PhReaKyDMoNKeY · · Score: 1

    What's with all the martial arts stars playing two roles at once these days? Double Impact, Twin Dragons, The One... Apparently this isn't limited to big budget actors either (http://www.spcnet.tv/tvb_finalcombat.html). Mike Myers has been the only one to do it well since the Parent Trap. I think one actor who kicks ass but can't act his way out of a paper bag is enough for any movie...

    1. Re:Seeing double by pwinn · · Score: 1

      Mike Myers and Eddie Murphy, you mean...

      --

      Pick a random signature from http://winn.com/bs/signatures.html
    2. Re:Seeing double by number+one+duck · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting Eddie Murphy...

    3. Re:Seeing double by nomadic · · Score: 2


      There are two ways you can instantly tell that a movie is bad:

      1. The protagonist is a monkey.

      2. The leading actor plays his or her own twin.

  40. Its a bad movie??? by LazyDawg · · Score: 2

    Ok,

    Katz says that one or two of the fight scenes are first rate. They have people going around drop-kicking themselves and dodging bullets. The commercials didn't pretend this was anything but an action movie, and a pretty brainless one at that, with all kinds of matrix-ripoff eye candy.

    What exactly is the problem?

    When I go to a movie, I typically like to see the kind of content that was in the movie trailer. For example, Life, a depressing movie about prison guards, was NOT a good movie, because they made it out to be a comedy in the trailer, and left everyone bewildered, drawing the wrong crowd.

    The One doesn't appear to be pulling any of that bullshit. Instead, they're saying outright: "This is a Jet Li action movie. Do not come for drama or deep insights about the future." That way, hopefully, they're advertising to the right crowd.

    If you're going to review a movie, you might aswell judge it based upon what kind of movie it is, not how well it fits the slant you like to write about all the time.

    --
    "Look at me, I invented the stove!" -- Ben Franklin
    1. Re:Its a bad movie??? by Hollinger · · Score: 1

      Actually, my favorite way of "rating" movies is to judge it by how much money a ticket to the movie seemed to be worth. This one, I'd say was maybe worth $2. Go see it on matinee, or something if you really have to.

  41. 0.9mm? by Roadmaster · · Score: 1

    0.9 mm equals 1/32 of an inch.. man, those are pretty small bullets. Needle guns, anyone?

  42. NOT a Matrix ripoff by Apotsy · · Score: 2
    So anything with virtual camera effects and wire-fu is automatically a Matrix rip-off? Yeah, right.

    "The Matrix" did not invent either of those two techniques. The virtual camera effect (a.k.a. "bullet time") was first seen in TV commercials such as those for The Gap. And wire-fu had been done in Hong Kong flicks for years before The Matrix came along.

    No Jon, if you had really been paying attention, you would have noticed that "The One" is actually a ripoff of "Terminator 2" more than anything else.

    1. Re:NOT a Matrix ripoff by Luminous · · Score: 2

      According to my Matrix DVD behind the scenes stuff, bullet-time was first used in The Matrix but due to the 'Time-to-theater' issue, commercials got to showcase the technology before the movie did.

      --
      This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
    2. Re:NOT a Matrix ripoff by Apotsy · · Score: 2
      Not quite. In the behind the scenes stuff, John Gaeta says "bullet time" was developed specifically for The Matrix. However, he does not give anything about the Gap commercials. You're just supposed to assume it came out of that.

      But have a look at this article from American Cinematographer, describing the "virtual camera" system. It's dated 1996 -- three years before The Matrix was released.

      I'm sure the people who made The Matrix would like everyone to believe they invented their techniques out of thin air, but the truth is, the idea had been around for a while.

    3. Re:NOT a Matrix ripoff by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      IIRC, Howard Stern had a system for it for his TV show intro long before the matrix. Not the same thing, but similar.
      I love geeks.. can't get into any discussion without it erupting into a flame war about lack of innovation and prior-art debates.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:NOT a Matrix ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bullet time" is not the same as "Trinity Jump Kick Freeze Frame," which was featured in Howard Stern's cut-to-commercial clips as well as the video for Meat Beat Manifesto's "Helter Skelter '97" (which was very, very cool when it came out). The multi-camera patching process works well only for still frames, where all the cameras take a picture at the exact same moment (ref: XFL instant replays from the skycams -- they'd show the "around" view for a single frame, then continue with slow-motion replay). AFAIK, "Bullet Time" is a CG trick having less (but likely something) to do with this method.

    5. Re:NOT a Matrix ripoff by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      No, if you look at the behind-the-scenes stuff on the Matrix DVD, you'll see that they are also using multiple still cameras, just like the older "virtual camera" technique.

      The main difference in The Matrix's "bullet time" scenes, is that the cameras are triggered to fire at different times rather than simultaneously. That is a totally separate issue from what kind of CG interpolation is used between the frames. The frames are still captured using 35mm still cameras, just like before.

      Whether or not the cameras fire at the same time is just a minor tweak. The major part of the idea had already been invented by the time The Matrix came along.

  43. i dont get it by psychalgia · · Score: 1

    is this a sequel to the matrix or not?!

    --

    ________________________________________________

    1. Re:i dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I take it that there was a movie called Matrix recently?

  44. Well you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    DAMN MY FUCKING CAPS LOCK KEY IS STRUCK. DAMN CAN'T POST HERE ANYMORE


    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  45. the reviews are wrong by dtrevino · · Score: 1

    When are people gonna accept this type of movie for what it is...ENTERTAINMENT. There is no deep message. No social commentary. The SF was merely a frame to give the action some context. In that sense, it was successful. The action was better than average. The FX were awesome. The sound track rocked. I enjoyed this movie. But then I didnt go in seeking spirituality or film as art.

    --
    Embrace the wrevolution!
    1. Re:the reviews are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo.

      Personally, I can't stand excessive wire work if there isn't something to justify it. Just give me something that I can use to suspend my disbelief and I enjoy it. I don't care about technique, I just want to be entertained.

  46. (Spoilage warning: plot discussed, not ending.) by tcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Heh... with most hollywood production, plot discussing IS the spoilage, everybody knows the endings are either predictable (80%) or scrap the entire movie (K-pax) (15%) in some rare cases you have a good ending that doesn't make you feel raped off your 9$ entrance fee (well here in canada anyways :) ).

    Example of a good balance of storyline, action, effects and ending for Sci-fi movies: Terminator II. You can have an hollywood ending without spoiling the entire movie, I almost cried when I saw him going down... I don't recall any movies that got my full attention and even got me right into it to the point that I was all messed up when I got out, not THAT'S entertaining, that's worth the price ticket, that's worth not being copied and BOUGHT on DVD, that I can have all respect from the MPAA or any other organisation behind it trying to protect their trademark and all.

    Maybe if hollywood would start pumping more good productions like these (T2, 2001, heck, remember ET when you were a kid?, etc), people wouldn't download them off the internet and actually go see them in a big theatre with super dooper sound and popcorn, that would be worth it. Watching that on a monitor, or 25 inch tv would spoil most of it... Face it, it's far from being every pirate that owns a projection system or a 60" TV to enjoy a movie almost like if he was in a theatre. So maybe by making quality stuff and not taking their customers (audience) for complete retards, they would bring in more people.

    My reasonning works when we look at almost every classics. Anything that is unbalanced, sucks or flop. (battlefield earth is a nice example of unbalanced).

    Ask yourself what were the biggest success in the last 25 years... aside from tron that flopped because the people weren't ready for that kind of stuff, they all had something in common: Amazing or simple but good storyline, Excellent effects, good acting, good ambiance, all of this balanced.

    I'd pay 20$ per movie if I was sure that I wouldn't be pissed or left on my appetite at the end, of course it's a matter of taste also, that being noted, there's also a baseline if you don't like scifi movies, you don't want to go see one just to get pissed afterwards :) , I'd be so freakin PLEASED to pay more just to filter out the garbage and not was my time and gas for that matter.

    I'm sure I am not the only one.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:(Spoilage warning: plot discussed, not ending.) by broller · · Score: 1
      heck, remember ET when you were a kid?

      You're in luck, there was Trailer for ET with Monsters Inc. They're rereleasing it in March 2002, redone for the 20th anniversary.

    2. Re:(Spoilage warning: plot discussed, not ending.) by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Example of a good balance of storyline, action, effects and ending for Sci-fi movies: Terminator II. You can have an hollywood ending without spoiling the entire movie...

      Ironically enough, Terminator II's originally scripted ending was terrible: it took place 30 years in the future (I think) and had what's-her-name O'Connor recording her memoires as an old lady in a happy-fancy future. (Next to the playground where all the children are playing and got blown up in the nuclear strike shots - except that the buildings are drawn in this cheasy-futuristic style.)

      Thank God (or your deity/spirits of choice) that they came to their senses and replaced the ending with the final one that came out on film...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  47. Saw it last night... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    Had a lot of fun. I do wushu, though, so I liked seeing Jet Li doing Bagua and some other form I totally did not recognize.

    I dunno what you expected out of the movie, but I wasn't expecting anything better than Highlander, which seemed suspiciously similar.

    The fact that the two Jets were only distinguished because of their fighting styles (how very martial arts :) might have made things confusing.

    I thought it was trippy that Jet Li in at least two, if not three, universes always fell for the same woman.

    1. Re:Saw it last night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I thought it was trippy that Jet Li in at least two, if not three, universes always fell for the same woman.

      He should be, since he's been married for a while now. If he fell for a different woman, then he'd have to answer to his wife. And every good martial artist fears his wife :P

    2. Re:Saw it last night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good JetLi does Bagua. Bad JetLi does XingYi (half-step beng quan, I believe).

    3. Re:Saw it last night... by Stormbringer · · Score: 2

      ...Jet no baka, huh...

  48. If you want a decent movie to watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just click here(and no sicko, its not pointing to the goatsex page!

  49. Re:Martial Arts for the Americans of Hollywood by secolactico · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear! I wholeheartedly agree with you. Go rent Chinese Connection or Feathered Snake (or somesuch) if you want to see a real kung fu movie.

    --
    No sig
  50. Stuck in The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be sad to be so limited to think nothing else but "Matrix" ever since that movie came out.

    Let's face it, that movie wasn't as intelligent as many want to believe, with Keanu Reeves' Bullshit-Fu and the non-plausible reliance on firearms.
    Just stop worshipping that cool-fx movie and do your review.

  51. What about the computers? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    I thought that the Matrix movies were about Neo and the Computers and a super-intelligent AI.... What happened to that? And are the parrallel universes all within the Matrix, or what? And this is a Matrix movie, right?

    1. Re:What about the computers? by kalanar · · Score: 0

      "The One" and the Matrix are not related. It's simply a rip-off title. And from what it sounds like a rip off of many movies (Highlander, The matrix, etc)

      the matrix sequels are not out yet.

      See here:

      The Matrix Revisited (2001)
      The Matrix Reloaded(2003)
      The Matrix 3 (2004)

  52. Equation for Kung Fu Movie Success by toolo · · Score: 0

    The lower the rating, the better the movie is. When you go to see a kung fu movie, featuring a kung fu star, what do you expect? This movie falls upon the line of America's Scariest Police Chases type of entertainment, not whatever else you're looking for. If you walk into this movie expecting plot and character development, you will be wasting time. If you walk into this movie expecting BRUTAL ASS KICKING FUN, you have made a good investment.

    Who cares what critics think anyway? If you nitpick anything it ruins the movie experience for you.

  53. $9 bucks? by indyz · · Score: 1
    in some rare cases you have a good ending that doesn't make you feel raped off your 9$ entrance fee (well here in canada anyways :) )

    So that's what, a buck fifty US?

  54. The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Jon, you have proven once again that you're an idiot. I can't believe people actually waste their time reading the shit that you spew.

    But The One (even the title is a ripoff from The Matrix) will bore even die-hard teen lovers of the form.

    Yeah, _The Matrix_ is the origin of all martial arts movies. It's so awesome (*chuckle*) that nothing could compare with its storyline and title. Gosh darnit! Even Shakespeare is a hack compared to _The Matrix_! Let's not forget about that plagirist Tolkien!

    It's slow, dull and humorless. Maybe it's time for this era to end. Jackie Chan does it a lot better, and with a lot more personality.

    You should also know that Jet Li wouldn't have faired better if he DID agree to appear in _The Matrix 2_. To many American producers and directors, Jet Li has already been type-casted as such a character. You wouldn't expect John Wayne to do a comedy, would you? Personally, if this movie is as bad as the impression you reviewers give of it, then I blame the hack of a writer who wrote the storyline.

  55. Jackie Chan vs. Jet Li by Castolari · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jet Li will jump in the air, flip three times, dodge an oncoming car, push off a wall, and kick you in the face 5 times before you hit the ground.

    Jackie Chan will jump in the air, flip three times, dodge an oncoming car, push off a wall, and slap you in the face 5 times WITH A LARGE TROUT before you hit the ground.

    I rest my case.

  56. Something Old, Something New,... by RoninM · · Score: 2
    "The One" borrows everything from everywhere. It looks like a high school student saw Highlander 2 and The Matrix relatively close together. Aside from the fact that most of the crucial elements of this movie are knocked-off from elsewhere, the adaptation doesn't make any sense whatsoever. So if whenever one of your other selves dies, all the rest get stronger, we should all fear the elderly because, logically, the chances are greater that their other selves have perished.

    Still, that explains much: Strom Thurmond is a supervillian.

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  57. I agree that "the one" kinda sucked, but by dapic · · Score: 0
    it seems the good Jet Li will lose, before he comes back with some other-worldly strength and starts kicking ass again. I knew it. I've 'seen' it.


    That's just too mean, man. Martial arts movies are always like that, ever since Bruce Lee. The Matrix and Jackie Chan were no exception.
  58. Re:Get your movies straight. - he did.. by RoninM · · Score: 1
    And maybe you aren't geeky enough? A simple comparison of the meanings is conclusive, here.

    The Matrix: Morpheus refers to Neo as "the One" in the sense that he is the Chosen One.

    Highlander: There can be only one. If you win the game, you are the One. What's the game? Killing the others of your sort.

    Uhm, what's that about a perfect parallel? The only thing The Matrix's "the One" has in common with The One's use of the same phrase is that... they're the same phrase. Not a thing else in common. OTOH, the premise and the phraseology are entirely like Highlander's.

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  59. Oh please, get a life!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please, get a life!!!

    Yeah, I bet these two bozos love chick-flicks too! I bet they are also the crying type; get a life!

    Dude, we men go to this type of movies for the same reason that you sissys are complaining about. If we wanted to go to a movie with a lot complications, without any shooting, spilling blood, nudity, and full of passion, we would stay at home to squezze and nail the living daylights of our girlfriends.

    Why use more brain cells than we have to? Are we trying to proof something here for personal ego or pipi envy? No, we don't do stupid things like that!
    So now, without loosing a second, run and buy or rent the 'Ladies Man,' and any other brain-dead movie you can find; play it over and over again until you start feeling your legs numb. Then and only then, you'll be allowed to get back to the tribe! And if someone knows these bozos, please smack them repeatedly for a few hours until they come to their senses!

  60. I agree, mod this up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ++

  61. my two cents by BIMashinu · · Score: 1

    This is just my humble opinion about this particular flick. A lot of what the first reviewer mentioned is true, but I disagree with their take on how it affected the movie. It was short, but this was a good thing. It didn't have all that mindless fluff in the middle that this genre likes to throw in there to add length. The fact that you often can't tell the two main characters apart was cool I thought. It was also a lot of little stuff; the special effects were absolutely first-rate. When jet li would jump between two overpasses or something, it didn't look as fake as such a thing usually does. It looked _real_. Aside from the lack of ammo (which is always the case), if people got injured, they _stayed_ injured. One of the characters gets a broken leg, and he doesn't forget about it in the next scene, or any scene thereafter. The last fight was a thing to behold. I think jet li played his character as he should: the strong, silent type. If I were that damn strong, I woulnd't say a whole lot, either. The soundtrack was cool, too. All-in-all I recommend it if you're a fan of the genre.

  62. Thanks for the warning, Jon, but... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the warning, Jon, but... I've seen a couple of these and now trailers pretty much warn me off of seeing these things. No one can deny that CTHD was a fine film, mostly because the story holds up, rather than the inexplicable type used even in Bruce Lee's flix.

    Every time I open the local free happenings paper and see another chinese film on the way I have to overcome the suspicion that it's just trying to play off CTHD success. Himalaya has zilch martial arts and is a great film to see if you would care to watch people from that neck of the woods not kick boxing their way through a story outlined on a bar napkin.

    Saw K-Pax last night, after all the great talk I've heard about it and left the theater thinking, "Huh? Ok, so how did that actually end?" Pretty entertaining otherwise.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  63. I gave up the one... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    To see the starwars trailer which came with a bonus movie of Monsters Inc.

    Sigh..

    my girlfriend cried in Monsters Inc.... it wasn't that sad a movie.

    That aside, The One seems like a sweet-ass clone of Matrix.

  64. Newer Jet Li Movies are very disappointing by mattx · · Score: 0

    Yes, the newer Jet Li movies are pretty bad, but that's because they've been "Hollywood-ized". If you want to see *real* martial arts action, you need to see older Jet Li movies. Forget about Jackie Chan. Jet Li is a national hero in China (I know this because I am friends with a man from China. He'll tell you all about Jet Li).

    Fong Shi Yu (The Legend)
    Tai ji Zhang San Feng (Twin Warriors)
    Fong Shi Yu II: Wan fu mo di (Legend of Fong Sai Yuk 2)
    Jing wu ying xiong (Fist of Legend)
    Hong Xiguan zhi Shaolin wu zu (New Legend of Shaolin)

    Jet Li blows away Jackie Chan and lame Matrix "action". End of Story.

    1. Re:Newer Jet Li Movies are very disappointing by MisterPo · · Score: 1

      Hey Matt,

      Jet Li is legendary only in how annoying he is. He is *never* beaten up in his films, does not kick well and is such a bad actor that he is dubbed in nearly all his films (Mandarin and Cantonese).

      If there was any justice then Chiu Cheuk, star of "The Blade", would be making Li sized movies. He too is national champion in Wushu......

      Regards,

      Po

  65. Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a cinematic snob.

  66. It wasn't *bad*. by farrellj · · Score: 2

    But it wasn't good either. It seemed like a pilot for a TV show that got modified to become a vehicle for Jet Li. I must admit, I did enjoy the point in the final fight scene where the Good Li changed from a Hard Form martial art to Soft Form martial art...nice in joke!

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  67. What movie did you people go see? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    Get a clue people, everything is not a rip off of 'The Matrix'. While 'The Matrix' was one buttkicking sweet movie, every movie that comes after it can't be dissed for using technology they invented for it!

    The One is a great action flick. The plot is decent, and it's fun to watch Jet Li smash a guy between to motorcycles.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  68. Why??????? by until(0) · · Score: 1

    Why, in both reviews, must you compare 'The One' to 'The Matrix'???? What? Is the 'Matrix' some kind of universal shining point in film?? Well, not in my opinion.... In fact, I think it's quite rediculous to use the 'Matrix' as a reference point for a martial arts film, since a bunch of dumb 'hip' white people in latex pants jumping around with millions of dollars worth of special effects is NOT martial arts.... Let's face it, while yes 'Iron Monkey' was at times correographed by the same person, the 'Matrix' was still a joke when it came to martial arts.... A f@@king joke... So, please, don't let that cheesy Gibson/Stephenson/Ellison ripoff of a movie (with all of its horrible cast) sneak its way into every single movie review....

    --
    -da5id
  69. My own personal review by HippieChick · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I first heard about _The One_, I was incredibly excited. It sounded like the perfect merger between the Hong Kong action flick and Hollywood special effects. They've been adding big-budget effects to kung-fu oriented films for a while now, but for the most part, they were sed to add some bang to the fight, for big, over-the-top single attacks, or as a replacement for actors with real fighting experience. Here, they would be forced by the nature of the story to actually muck around with the way people move and
    interact. Plus, I really liked Jet Li.

    That was several years ago. This July, I caught my first glimpse of a trailer for the film at Comic-Con in San Diego. I became excited all over again. It looked like they had really done what I was hoping they would do. Jet Li's
    character picks up a motorcycle in one hand and whacks somebody over the head with it. And while that's an obvious biological (and some may argue,
    physical) impossibility, the sound and imagery contained enough gravity to convince me. The clips shown had a real impact, something that they'd only begun to incorporate in films like The Matrix and The Duel. Plus, I really liked Jet Li.

    Then the TV spots came. Now I watch a lot of television, so I get a bit more exposure to advertising than your average human. I saw the trailer way too many times, and while I'm thankful that they didn't feel the need to put every action shot in the whole movie into the trailer, I did end up seeing the same stuff over and over again. I was still excited, but expose a person to something enough times, and they do get desensitized. But I still really liked Jet Li.

    Then the reviews came in. I read bits and pieces of a lot of different reviewers and the consensus seemed to be that while there were some really
    good fighting sequences in the movie, the rest of the movie was crap. Critics complained about poor acting performances and stupid plotlines. My
    expectations fell significantly. I was still looking forward to what I expected to be a few really nifty action sequences pasted together with some shoddy plot-building scenes and crappy one-liners. But there is no denying the fact that I still really liked Jet Li.

    So tonight, I went and saw _The One_. After I'd sat through the first twenty minutes of the movie, I began to wonder where all the awful acting was supposed to be. These certainly weren't Oscar-calibre performances, but Jet Li and Delroy Lindo gave as respectable an acting job as one would find in any good action flick. The storyline made sense. The actions of the characters were well-motivated. I laughed when I was supposed to. It was clear that the premise was over-the-top and that we were dealing with the soft science fiction of convenience and not the hard science fiction of physicists. Many
    action movies, both from Hollywood and Hong Kong, seem to ignore the necessity of these elements. The rest of the movie doesn't have to be spectacular, but it has to be good enough to carry the viewers from one action sequence to
    another. And _The One_ had enough quality in all the right places to do just that.

    Now I realize that this is a lot of build-up for just a review, but I wanted to give a feel for the state of mind that I was in when I went to see this movie. When I first heard about it, I was expecting a bit more than was reasonable to get out of a movie. And yet somehow, _The One_ delivered. This is one damned fine movie. The fights and chases build steadily throughout the
    movie as the hero and the villain dance around each other. They don't use their superhuman abilities sparingly. These are the two most powerful beings in the entire multiverse, and _The One_ does an incredible job of letting us
    know. Of course all the chasing and dodging is simply rising action. It all leads to a final showdown, like the most classic of kung-fu films. We are promised a fight to end all fights, and we get it. It's not just super-fast
    blows and fancy jumping and dodging. Every hit that is landed has the impact of a sledgehammer behind it. This is power.

    The special effects are used with remarkable results. While there a few brief instances where a few more hours at a computer could have yielded better results, the overall impression is seamless and transparent. There was no doubt in my mind that there were two Jet Li's on that screen and that they were beating the crap out of each other at the speed of sound. Slow motion is
    an effect that is rarely used properly, specially when extremely fast martial arts is involved. _The One_ is an exception. Due to careful attention to the laws of physics and the constant presence of normal-speed motion (e.g. falling sparks and turning machinery) in the background, we get a wonderful gut-feeling of just exactly how fast these guys are moving. Jet Li throws his arms and legs at ludicrous speed as he flies through the air, but at the same time, he's falling at a normal rate. Gravity still works, even though physiology was thrown out the window at the opening.

    Incidental effects were also very well done, like the travelling-between-universes effect. The little bits of humor were funny, if a bit silly. Jet Li delivers an understated, but effective performance. Delroy Lindo admirably fills the obligitory nowhere-near-as-good-as-the-hero-or-villain-but-st ill-manages-to-hold-his-own role. I even liked the ending.

    In short, this is one good movie, and you should go see it. The critics don't know what they're talking about.

    And in case you're wondering, yes, I still really like Jet Li.

    HC

    --
    HC
  70. Isn't it about time.... by NerveGas · · Score: 2

    >Isn't it high time, so long as we're zipping people around via particle beams, to find a fresher weapon than the .9mm pistol

    Isn't it about time that people stopped saying ".9mm"? Being shot with a 0.03-caliber pistol doesn't sound very painful.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  71. Ebert's Review by talonyx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gee, thanks, Ebert.

    Why don't you at least link to his review instead of quoting without attributing it?

    anyways for everyone else go check it out, it's a funny read.

  72. The best part... by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

    Was the most amusing part when the evil Jet Li proclaims, "I'm nobody's bitch!"

    --
    "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
  73. Maybe you should look at his discography closer by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > Who *really* sees Jet Li / Jackie Chan / etc movies with any intention of good screen writing, a plot, or any sense of meaning?

    Guess you haven't "Fist of Legend" then.

    Dare I say it, one of the best martial arts of all time.

    1. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by No-op · · Score: 2

      oh, I'm a huge fan of his. Fist of Legend is a wonderful flick, as is "The Enforcer" (at least in my opinion.) I think Jet Li is great, and some of his movies really have a plot and some emotional depth to them. just not all of them. I'm still a loyal fan regardless :)

      --
      EOM
    2. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      Fuckin' A. That was one incredible movie. Well written, *well acted*, great camerawork, stunning fight scenes. The one with blindfolds was incredible. I need to buy this on DVD, soon.

      I don't usually expect that much from a Jet Li movie either, but even some of the worse ones I've seen- like "Black Mask"- have at least been good trashy fun. What pissed me off about "The One" was that even the fight scenes weren't too great. Jet Li is the type of guy who shouldn't use special effects, and this movie heaped them on. "Kiss of the Dragon" wasn't a very good movie, but at least when he got a chance to give a beatdown he did it without effects, and looked superb.

    3. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must mention "Once upon a time in China" and "New Legend of Shaolin" I made it a point to own all of those as well as the previously mentioned "Fist of Legend". See them, you will gain a new respect for Jet Li and the films he is in.

    4. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      What you're all forgeting, is that Jet Li pales in comparison to the all-time best, Jackie Chan. You can't watch Drunken Master and Black Mask side by side and tell me that Black Mask is the victor in any comparison.

    5. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's because Drunken Master II is Jackie Chan's best Film, and Black Mask is one of Li's worst. I'll Put Fist of Legend up against DMII almost any day, as they are perhaps the 2 best HK Kung Fu movies I've ever seen.

    6. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      And speaking of original, have any of you ever seen a little Film called "Fist of Fury"? Or maybe you've seen it as "The Chinese Connection". I agree that fist of legend is perhaps Jet Li's best film, but let's not criticize "the One" for being a rip-off, and then praise a DIRECT RE-MAKE of the best film Bruce Lee ever made and call it the second coming. I In fact like fist of legend better than fist of fury, but that is simply because Lee's version is very dated in many ways. And after all, if there had not been a bruce lee, there would likely not have been a Jet Li or a Jackie Chan.

    7. Re:Maybe you should look at his discography closer by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > I must mention "Once upon a time in China" and "New Legend of Shaolin"

      Cool. Thx for the movie recommendation! I was looking to expand my Jet Li DVD section but was unsure which ones on his discography were actually worth getting.

      I'm *REAL* glad a friend of mine told me, back in college, "You HAVE to check out this video of Jet Li".
      I go: "Who is Jet Li??"
      He replies "You've never heard of Jet Li!?!? Watch this tape!!"

      It was Fist of Legend, and my jaw dropped at how good it was.

      Unfortunately, me being a dumb@$$, I completely forgot the title! and could only partially remember Jet Li's name. I was estatic when I finally tracked it down on DVD this year.

      Now if only I could get a review on each one of
      Jet Li's other movies, so I knew which ones were ones I should pick up. ;-)

      Thx again !

  74. Iron Monkey. by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2

    Other posts seem to echo just this - Go see Iron Monkey instead.

    I went to see The One with friends last night, and we were all dissapointed. (Especially my friend Jen and Myself who study Wing Chun Kung Fu).

    The One is a Highlander/Matrix ripoff, and while Jet Li always has excellent Wushu, there is little of it in this film that is not enhanced with computer assistance.

    Iron Monkey on the other hand has wall to wall Kung Fu action, with a cadre of excellent practioners and a multitude of styles (I saw Choy Li Fut and Lau Gar styles in the film along with the standard Wushu).

    I won't get into plot or spoilers, but go see Iron Monkey - it has funny parts, and all of us in the theatre (only 8 of us, compared to a FULL theater for The One), and Iron Monkey has excellent action.

    Iron Monkey beats up The One any day.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  75. Re:Get your movies straight. - he did.. by Dallan · · Score: 1

    Actually, when my friends and I first saw the trailer for 'The One', we thought it might be a Matrix sequel of some sort.

    You have to admit that the Freaky Jet Li Powers are right out of the Matrix, frex.

    The premise and plot, now that I know something of them, are far closer to Highlander, but the movie itself is _a lot_ like the Matrix.

    Except worse, of course. :)

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
  76. Camera too quick and close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I liked the way the Matrix let you see what was going on; subtle editing touches and good camera work made scenes like the "metal detector-government lobby" fight classic IMHO. The One may have had some cool slo-mo effects (the sparks slowing down), but for the most part the camera was too frantic or too close to let you really see the action. It's a shame that they spent months and months (not to mention bundles of money) on post-production, only to have many of the effects missed by the audience because of some poor planning with the shots. The One wasn't worth the $6.50 I paid for it.

  77. Most of Jackie's american movies are from HK. by machinegestalt · · Score: 1

    Actually, most of Jackie Chan's movies seen in American cinemas are of Hong Kong origin. As I recall, Rush Hour was his first american made movie (I remember hearing him gripe about american studios and their insurance restrictions preventing him from doing his own stunts). He may have made more American movies since the Rush Hour franchise, but I havn't seen a Jackie Chan movie in a couple of years so I wouldn't know.

    Please be careful when you say that jackie chan's work in Hong Kong overshadow his Hollywood work, since it's possible you're confusing them.

    Nathan
    ---
    If we have not succeeded, it is because we have failed - Dan Quayle

  78. This begs the question by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Does the evil Li have a moustache?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  79. Come on, it wasn't bad at all by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

    You people who disliked it (for all of the reasons I've read) all had the wrong state of mind for the movie. Yes, the writing was bad, yes, the fighting was not the best I've ever seen, but I very much enjoyed it. Why? Well, the fighting was extremely brutal as somone earlier said. In fact, it was SO brutal that it was funny. Someone picking up two motercycles and smashing someone between them is funny as all hell, IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR THAT. If you have yet to see the movie, please do. But you will only enjoy it if you are looking for a foolish "let's look at a Jet Li break people in half while laughing" movie. If you do, and last through the whole movie without hating it, then the last 3 lines of the movie will make you cry in laughter.

    --

    Don't Bogart the fish sticks
  80. Matrix Reloaded (or whatever...) by hound3000 · · Score: 1

    Just about every movie with an "action" sequence has ripped off, or other made fun of the Matrix since it came out. I'm wondering if the brothers in charge of the Matrix franchise are going to address this in any way in the one of the next two movies.

    And by addressing, I mean, point out and poke fun at the spoofing in other movies, and some slight verbal comment that be the effect of: 'Not everybody can slow down time correctly.' (Better written of course, and slipped into the script just so...)

    But for the first time, I think Katz might be right, (one of the signs of the coming apocalypse.)

    Bullet Time, and other such Matrix effects are getting old, quick.

  81. Balance grasshopper, balance... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2

    Ok, ignore the crappy subject line and hear me out.

    Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't Jet Li's first intro to American film was in Lethal Weapon 3 or 4. (I don't remember off the top of my head).
    Now, Li in Lethal Weapon, was similar to Chan and Schwar...uh, Arnold S. in the Terminator 1 and 2 films...their primary talent (action) spoke louder for them than their voices ever did.

    I brought up with the Monsters, Inc. topic that certain voice actors *don't need* to be seen to be appreciated.

    As a brief mental excercise, Imagine trading....ohhh, say...Anthony Hopkins' role in "The Silence of the Lambs" with Arnold S's role in "Terminator". Does not work at all does it?
    (yes, typecasting and stereotyping issues aside, but we are talking about Hollywood's strengths)

    Anywho, more to the point and topic:
    I'm simple saying that in Li's performance in LW 3 or 4..he did not need to speak at all, and from the reviews, perhaps he should have kept his lines to a minimum like Arnold S. did in his early career (I think A.S. has said "I'll be bach" in all his movies...trademark?) and in the Terminator, especially....he did not need to speak, either.

    Contrast that to Hopkins' screen presence and vocal talents. He'd be as out of place in an action film as...as...a neon sign on a Xmas tree. Honestly A.H could have *still* carried the film TSOTL with half the dialogue...Hell, IMO he carried "Hannibal" to be a 8 out of 10 for me. Lack of Jodi Foster was -1/2 a star, but the *gorey* bits were the -1 1/2. (of course that is me, I could have lived w/o it...Imagine the movie "Psyco"...you did not *see* anything it was left up to the viewer).

    Point being, that Li's martial art skills are not in question, if I read the reviews correctly.
    The plot, the dialogue and the effects got in the way, correct?

    So perhaps taking a lesson from Lethal Weapon, because he helped *make that film* what it was (ok, Gibson and Glover, too) by his sheer presence and talent in the martial arts, not by his vocal skills.

    Speaking of Vocal Skillz, I'll shut up now.

    (oh, and if you are a Jacki Chan fan, The Legend of theDrunken Master and Who am I have some of the best fights I've see yet.
    Especially that "lankey" American Hit man type dude that I think was in both...absa-frikin-lutely wicked)

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  82. Troll alert, don't cross that bridge folks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You do realize that feeding trolls encourages them, I hope.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Troll alert, don't cross that bridge folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hope to encourage feeding trolls?

      I really hate people who cry TROLL because they do not like what another says. Try Yahoo Groups if youw ant people to always say exactly what you like to hear. Either that or grow up..

    2. Re:Troll alert, don't cross that bridge folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, he shouldn't have responded to Katz then...

    3. Re:Troll alert, don't cross that bridge folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I hope that you realize that some people just don't like being insulted. I'm fairly young, and I don't like being portrayed by a washed-up writer as being some sort of a delinquent in a sweeping generalization such as that. I've never had to sneak into a movie. I probably never will. I've seen people over 45 years old sneak into movies more often than people my own age, and I'm not blind to what's going on. Just because he might have an opinion and be -angry- about something does -not- make him a troll.

    4. Re:Troll alert, don't cross that bridge folks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      And I hope that you realize that some people just don't like being insulted. I'm fairly young, and I don't like being portrayed by a washed-up writer as being some sort of a delinquent in a sweeping generalization such as that.

      Now now, there's no need to insult Katz like that, we all know he can't defend himself.

      Katz didn't mention any age group. He just suggested that if you go to see it, you sneak in. He didn't say "Hey kids, go sneak into this uber-l33t movie!" or anything to that effect.

      It was a joke, albeit an unfunny one. Let it go.

      PS: I wouldn't have bothered to moderate as a troll, mind you. That's a waste of karma, and only people exceptionally deserving of karma loss should be negatively moderated. But fer chrissakes, getting all butt-hurt because someone makes a reference to an all-american pasttime like sneaking in to see a movie is just pathetic. Spending a lot of time and effort on it is indicative of trolldom.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  83. Come On, It's Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best way to describe the movie is as "The Thirteenth Floor with fight scenes". The story remarkably similar and the only link between The One and The Matrix is the slow mo bullet dodging. Really, the only major drawback to the movie was the horrible choice of music.. when will film makers learn that heavy metal / hard rock and rap just do not fit with martial arts fight scenes? Haven't US martial arts movies had this problem since.. i dunno.. "Only The Strong" ? :)

  84. just got done talking to simpsons 'comic book guy' by fjania · · Score: 2, Funny

    the votes are in
    the polls are closed
    the ballots have been counted...

    __worst movie ever__

  85. 'film noir'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is "The Matrix" derived from 'film noir'?

    'Film noir' is traditionally associated with detective
    movies with a narrator's commentary, in the style of Bogart's
    'Maltese Falcon'. The released 'Bladerunner' is also done in
    this style with Deckard supplying the narrator's commentary.

    I fail to see how "The Matrix" fits that bill.

  86. am i the only one that enjoyed this flick? by oddKryses · · Score: 1

    i keep reading about how a good number of you (including katz) couldn't see what was happening or couldn't follow the fight scenes... maybe it's because i'm used to speed (hardcore gamer i am!), but it really wasn't that difficult to follow them, nor that hard to understand the plot.

    the fight scenes kicked ass, especially the last one with the sparks (it's the little things that make all the difference). Street Fighter? what? just because they did a side shot of both Li's? i'd say it was much more fun than watching an arcade game (and that's saying a lot) because it was real people fighting with cool effects everywhere.

    and about the god thing, they never actually SAID he would become god, because they didn't KNOW what would happen: it was mere speculation.

    didn't katz pay attention? obviously not, since he termed it "incomprehensible gibberish". it was, in fact, quite understandable. you'd think it'd be, after he said it had no plot. and "Star Trek-ish time transporters"? dude, they were simple BLACK HOLES--they couldn't even control when or where it would happen (what about that chair thing? they build it AROUND the spot it occured in--that simple)... sounds like many of you have lost quite a bit of your imaginations, because that's what you needed to watch this film (and any other sci-fi for that matter)... i don't remember anything taking place in the sewers, either.

    i was entertained, and that's all i care about. i mean, that's what movies are for, right?

    --

    No one can put you down without your full cooperation.
  87. Snatch quote: by Mudhiker · · Score: 2

    "...and the fact that the word "replica" is written on your gun and the word "Desert Eagle .50" is written on mine, would percipitate your balls into shrinking......
    "

    --
    "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
  88. Why I prefer Matrix over The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Matrix would have been a harder sell.

    ----------

    Producer: Who are you and what do you want?

    Watchowskis: Uh, we want your help in making a film called "The Matrix."

    Producer: I'm listening.

    Watchowskis: It's sort of a Kung Fu film with Film Noir and Science Fiction elements. We've got, Uh Keanu Reeves-

    Producer: Does he know kung fu?

    Watchowskis: Uh no. We've also got Laurence Fishburne-

    Producer: Does he know kung fu?

    Watchowskis: Uh no. We've got Carrie Anne Moss-

    Producer: Does he know kung fu?

    Watchowskis: She's a she, and no. We've also got Hugo Weaving-

    Producer: Does he know kung fu?

    Watchowskis: No, but he's acted as a drag queen once.

    Producer: So this is a kung fu film where none of the actors actually KNOW kung fu?

    Watchowskis: Well, when you put it that way, yeah. But we'll teach them.

    Producer: So what's the story? (giggles) Sorry, I always do that for some reason.

    Watchowskis: It's about a guy who finds out his world is an illusion created by machines that have enslaved the human race. He journeys through the virtual world fighting computer programs with kung fu and in the end he gets killed and comes back to life and turns out to be Jesus Christ.

    Producer: (pauses) And how much money do you want?

    Watchowskis: Well, it's a co-production, but from you we'd need about... Forty million dollars.

    Producer: (presses button on desk) Security!

    (Several thugs come in and crack some Watchowski heads.)

    ---------

    That's what it would be like to try to sell "The Matrix" to a film industry that wouldn't know Jet Li if he kicked it in the face. You say "Yeun Wo Ping and they think you're describing fried chicken. Compare that to trying to sell "The One" AFTER the Matrix has been a huge success...

    ---------

    Jerk: Hi, I've got this great idea for a film!

    Producer: I'm listening.

    Jerk: It's a kung fu film, like the Matrix, but with a storyline that's sort of like Sliders meeting Highlander. The actors playing the hero and the villain both know Kung Fu - in fact, they're both Jet Li so it makes casting a lot easier. He's done some films over here already, and he's got a name that's like Bruce Lee!

    Producer: So basically we just take elements that have already proven themselves to be successful film material here in the west and slap it together?

    Jerk: Exactly.

    Producer: Great idea! (presses button on desk) Security!

    (Several thugs come in and crack the jerk's head, allowing the producer to write and direct the film himself.)

    ----------

    This is no better than what the Watchowski's did. They stole things that they KNEW would blow people away in the west because most of us haven't seen anything like it. They stole a lot of things and it slapped them together in a way that, when you step back and look at it, is absolutely horrific.

    But it was difficult to sell those things. It was taking something relatively unproven to producers and audiences in the west, and if it had failed then it might have killed the genre over here.

    The One, on the other hand, gets to ride the wave. Western audiences and producers who doubted the chances of the Matrix making it are suddenly eager to hop on the band wagon. Let's remember that Jet Li is only about a hundred times the martial artist that any of the cast of the Matrix are, and that is a big selling point when you're trying to get producers to buy in.

    Matrix would have been much, much harder to get support for.

  89. Super Shorty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In the U.S. you can't legally buy that super shorty without getting a Class III license. This takes about a year of background checks, after which you give up your 4th Amendment rights - the ATF can inspect your home at any time. And even then, you can't buy a Class III weapon that was made after 1986, or one that was made before 1968 without being registered upon passage of the '68 Gun Control Act. Screw any of this up, say by not properly checking the papers of the gun you purchase, or losing said papers so you can't prove proper registration to the ATF, and they can throw you in prison for ten years. No presumption of innocence here.

    Personally, I'd just take a shotgun with an extra six inches on the barrel.

  90. Re:Tai Chi Master IS GOOD by No-op · · Score: 1

    thanks for the heads up!

    --
    EOM
  91. Re:Get your movies straight. - he did.. by RoninM · · Score: 2
    That much we can agree with. This movie is a rip-off and a half. I'm willing to bet that some of the fight scenes have been directly ripped from older HK films (sometimes they rehash their own stuff, c.f., Xin Xin Xiong and the ladder fights in The Musketeer); the special effects are ripped from The Matrix; the plot is like Highlander meets Sliders.

    Now it wasn't awful, but it certainly wasn't a good movie./P.

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  92. Martial Arts Movies Are Like Porn... by Mzilikazi · · Score: 1
    ...you watch them for the "action" scenes, not the plot and story line. ;)



    I made this observation to a friend after watching "Kiss of the Dragon". A pretty forgettable plot, and some stuff that just didn't make much sense, but great fight scenes. Same thing goes for "Iron Monkey", which I saw this weekend. The plot was thin, the humor was forced, but the ass-kicking was great. (Except for that "Flying Sleeves of Pain" or whatever it was towards the end...)



    I haven't seen "The One" yet, but I figure it will be the same... I tend to go into these movies with pretty low expectations, and am almost never disappointed. :) One interesting note: on the DVD for "Black Mask", also with Jet Li, there is an option just for watching the fight scenes and nothing else. Whoo-hoo!

    --
    Random Musings at Rum Smuggler
  93. Re:Super Shorty - clueless! by Lottaguns · · Score: 1

    ***clueless said***
    In the U.S. you can't legally buy that super shorty without getting a Class III license. This takes about a year of background checks, after which you give up your 4th Amendment rights - the ATF can inspect your home at any time.
    ***end clueless***

    One thing I hate more than movies that provide gun disinformation (13 shot Desert Eagles, the ceramic "Glock 9", etc.) is people who don't even own NFA weapons telling people the wrong information.

    You don't need a license as an individual to purchase a Super Shorty in the USA, although you might in a few states that don't allow that type of AOW (Any Other Weapon, its federal classification). For instance, in my home state the Super Shorty is considered merely a pistol which just happens to be 12 gauge. The year of background checks is hogwash, there are background checks conducted while the Form 4 transfer is being approved (your prints and photos are run by the FBI), but they (NFA branch, the branch of ATF who oversees such transfers) have 90 days to approve or deny a transfer, by law.

    On the subject of giving up your 4th Amendment rights, you don't. ATF has no authority to come by after you own an NFA (that is to say National Firearms Act) weapon "any time they want". As an individual you're not subject to any inspection. If they want to come in, they need a warrant (at least that was the case before the bad terrorism laws passed recently, another subject).

    **more clueless**
    And even then, you can't buy a Class III weapon that was made after 1986
    **end clueless**

    Sure you can, if by "Class III" weapon you mean the correct term, "NFA weapon". NFA, or National Firearms Act weapons, include machine guns, short barreled shotguns, short barreled rifles, silencers and Any Other Weapons, or AOWs. Also Destructive Devices but we won't go into that here. May 19, 1986 was the date the Firearm Owners Protection Act went into effect. While it had many positive provisions for firearm owners, its big negative was that on that date no more machine guns could be made or registered for individual use, freezing the number of legal ones for individuals forever in the USA. It did not stop, however, the manufacture of any other types of NFA weapons for individuals. Thus, silencers, SBRs, SBS, AOWs (like the Super Shorty), and even some DDs can all be made new for individuals.

    Oh yeah, to keep it on topic, I once touched a minigun used in The Matrix. :)

  94. Previews of upcoming reviews by Katz by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

    "Harry Potter is a complete ripoff of The Matrix. Even the title is a ripoff."
    "The Lord of the Rings is a complete ripoff of The Matrix. Even the title is a ripoff."
    "Star Wars:Attack of the Clones is a complete ripoff of The Matrix. Even the title is a ripoff."
    "Spiderman is a complete ripoff of The Matrix. Even the title is a ripoff."

    "These last few years have been good for lovers of martial arts movies, until recently a fringe cinematic genre, and for a new generation of stars like Jet Li."
    Ahem! Jet Li is not new. He was making martial arts movies years before Keanu Reeves was saying "Excellent! Most haneous! 69 Dude!"

  95. Yuen Woo Ping? Try Ringo Lam instead :) by MisterPo · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a lot of Asians Jet Li is like Julia Roberts in that they get to star in big movies but are amazingly annoying. Li rarely gets hits in films and is as emotive as a plank of wood. His style is Wu-shu, indeed he was the National Champion in China, is good for movies as it is very showy (debuts as a demo sport in the next Olympics), but Li *cannot* kick! His hands are superb, but his footwork is terrible....

    Iron Monkey is one of my favourite martial arts films of all time. In fact I have a laserdisc version from 1993 :). The movie is spectacular because of the martial artists, the style showcased is Hung Gar Kung Fu and features some of his Yen's best work ever. Though I think Yu Rong Guang steals the show, he moves *so* well for a big man....

    But for people looking to get into the genre, then try these movies:

    Storm Riders - as close to a "living" comic book as you will ever see (stars Sonny Chiba!)
    Bride with White Hair - Ronny Yu directs and Peter Pau (Oscar - CTHD) with perhaps his best cinematography ever.
    Ashes of Time - Like Crouching Tiger, all Asian men want to be Kung Fu heroes, Wong Kar Wai (Chung King Express, In the Mood for Love) is no different. With action direction by Samo Hung (Martial Law :P), and cinematography by long time partner Christopher Doyle, the movie is a heart-breakingly beautiful series of stories all interwoven seemlessly. Stunning.
    The Blade - Tsui Hark again (Iron Monkey), narrated through the eyes of a woman, this movie has the most deliriously violent and explosive examples of swordplay ever committed to film.
    Zu: Warriors from Magic Mountain - Tsui Hark is remaking this one, soon to be released, the original had special effects crew who worked on Star Wars and this is where modern day HK wirework came from.

    Yes I know that some of the "old skool" fighting films are great too, but I am recommending these for people who are getting into the genre. Else films like Dreadnaught, Prodigal Son, Drunken Master, Mars Villa, Venoms, and 36 Chambers would be here :)

    But for me, the best martial arts movie of recent times is Ringo Lam's "Burning Paradise". Wong Fei Hung (Iron-Monkey) meets another legendary kung fu master, Fong Sai Yuk. This movie was directed by Lam who usually deals with serious dramas and so it is dark in tone and very violent. The sets, story, and production value are superb and the fighting (employing real monks!) has to be seen to be believed.

    Regards,

    Po

  96. Why do people like fight movies to be stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really do not understand the American need to see awesome fighters like Jet Li or Jackie Chan making moroninc lame jokes while kicking ass.

    I have seen just about every Jet Li movie ever made. His American movies have progressively gotten worse from the start, while his HK movies were awesome beyond belief.

    Please tell me I'm not alone here. I just like ass kicking. Leave out the stupid jokes!

    jon

  97. Could have been worse... by Cynikal · · Score: 1

    But then again it could have been worse..

    *spoiler or whatever*

    Maybe we were just spoiled by the depth of The Matrix story line, how alot of people had to watch it 2 or 3 times to get it (i dunno, i got it the first time).. but in The One, they could have improved the story line better by starting before HuLaw (or whatever) killed his first, and take the audience along with his discovery of what effect that had, etc..

    I must say, i liked how the travel worked, just made it a tad bit more believable to see them incapacitated afterwards; i've always felt that with how transporters rip you apart atom by atom, they should be a bit more painful than a light tingly feeling. although i hate how in the end they convienently recovered so much faster after the inter-dimentional travelling.

    then theres the predictability of the whole thing, you KNOW in the end they'd grab the wrong guy to sentence him to the hades universe.
    All in all, however, it was worth my time.. wasn't worth $8.50, but was worth my time. I'm paid to think all day, and my brain almost aches by 6pm, so i'm not *that* dissapointed when i see a movie that doesn't make me think.

  98. Re:Saw it last night... - Kungfu styles! by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1
    Evil jet li seems Hsing-i Chuan (xing yi) the whole time, I agree.

    Good Jet Li starts bagua while he's training and getting warmed up essentially (they show him doing forms at home), but when he goes to full on ass kicking mode at the end (after getting his ass good and tore up) he changes in to tai-chi chuan.

    Would you agree?

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  99. As if Katz isn't bad enough... by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

    Now we get to listen to his twit buddy too. This keeps getting better and better. Next we get Katz's Mom reviewing films. I can't wait.
    In 1985, when Mr. Matrix was in his first film, Jet Li already had at least 6 years of film under his belt. This was a 2 second research effort, Katz, check at least one fact per article in the future please.
    Is the Matrix the only movie you ever liked? How the hell is this film derivative of the Matrix? Did you actually watch it, or did you leave right afrter the credits, like you did with Jurassic park 3?
    If you like Kung Fu movies, you'll like this flick. End of story. If you only liked the Matrix, skip it.
    Tell me Katz, are you gonna pan Matrix 2 because it's a rip off of the Matrix?
    Mr. Katz, there is a resource availible on the "internet", which I'm sure you think is somehow a Matrix rip off, called the internet movie database. It can be found at http://www.imdb.com . You can use this to check dates, bodies of work, or actors that appear in movies. I suggest you check this in the future prior to making these embarassing gaffes in your "reviews". Thanks.
    PS- If you had ever seen any movies prior to the Matrix, particularly in the Kung Fu genre, you would see how derivative it was on Hong Kong kung fu flicks. Using the aforementioned imdb you can see that many of the key people responsible for the "look and feel" of the Matrix cut thier teeth on Kung Fu flicks. So which is the rip off?

    --
    Carpe Deez
  100. Rope tricks.... by flewp · · Score: 1

    Get rid of them, they suck, unless done right, and that's hard to do. They always look so fake, and just plain stupid. I know I should suspend my beliefs of reality while watching a movie, but sometimes they're so off in terms of natural human movement it looks ridiculus.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  101. Re:Saw it last night... - Kungfu styles! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    It certainly *looked* like taichi to me, but I can't be authoritative on that. I just kept thinking "Hmmm, I've seen this in his 'Tai Chi Master' movie."

    Except the SFX was much, much, better, and the bad guy much, much, cooler.

  102. Crouching Highlander, Hidden Matrix by kriegsman · · Score: 1

    Credit for "Crouching Highlander, Hidden Matrix" actually goes to Deirdre Benson, who seemed to have nailed it just right as soon as she had seen the trailer. Props, girl!

    -Mark

  103. Clueless responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with a thanks for making me less clueless. If you don't mind some questions...is the Class III required only for machine guns, while an AOW just requires that the weapon be registered under the NFA? Is the inspection requirement only for dealers, not for individuals with a Class III? If you're not a dealer, what do have to do to avoid getting nabbed for illegal transfer? And to get a Class III, does the 90-day limit apply, and do you need a signature by your local sheriff or equivalent?

  104. probably pointless to give my 2 cents... by AtaruMoroboshi · · Score: 1


    but here we go:

    I'm a die hard Jet Li fan. I regularly import dvds directly from Hong Kong, and have watched over 18 Jet Li films, in the original language when possible. (The english dub of Fist of Legend changes some of the best dialog into crap!)

    The One was better than Romeo Must Die, but I liked Kiss of the Dragon and Black Mask more.

    The special effects were really cool, and the Li vs. Li fight at the end was a joy, but Jet's acting was uncharacteristically bad. He's a great, charismatic guy in his films from Hong Kong, and I was bummed that this film felt rushed.

    Anyhow, I had a really great time watching this flick, and will probably eventually get a dvd of it, if only to complete my jet li collection.

    fyi, great jet li films are:

    "serious film"
    Once Upon A Time In China 1 & 2
    Fist of Legend

    "goofy films"
    Swordsman 2
    New Legend of Shaolin
    The Legend of Fong Sai Yuk

    that's enough to get started.

  105. jets best movie by afdsfsdafsdaf · · Score: 1

    i still think Fist of Legend (bruce lee re-make) by Jet Li is about the best thing he has produced ever.. the fight scenes are incredible, with the best one between jet and his lovers uncle in the courtyard outside their house... blindfolds and all this fight was hands down one of the best...

    he carries that genuinely "pissed off" look throughout the movie and he pulls it off without fail.. cant comment on "the one" though.. aside from recognizing the obvious matrix ripoff only seconds into the trailer.. geeez..

    i leave you all with a great adam sandler quote from his tollbooth willy bit (NASTY LANGUAGE WARNING) -

    "Fuck you ya fucking un-original bastard, go suck a cock you piece of fuckin repeating shit!!!"

    ---------
    Don't discourage the boy marge, weasingling out of things is what seperates men from the animals.... except the weasel.... - homer

  106. Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure how the Matrix has attained such a level of high regard now and days. The plot was interesting, but in the end it just seemed like a cliche super-hero story. The last scene where Neo flys through the air like superman almost made me laugh. The movie seemed so stylish at first, but the end just reeked of cheesiness.

  107. The interesting moral distinction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that the primary difference between the final two Jet Lis was that one was loved by a good woman, and the other never met her until much too late. I thought that wasn't a trivial difference, and if you do, buckaroos, then you just haven't met that right woman and been worthy of her. Turn off the computer and go learn how to dance or volunteer, my fellow Geeks.