Slashdot Mirror


Virtual Keyboard a Reality

billmaly writes "Yahoo has a photo and blurb here about a Virtual Keyboard That shows a photo and bit of text on a virtual keyboard for Palm and other mobile devices. Applications seen for mobile computing, as well as areas where a standard, physical keyboard are not practical. Very cool stuff from Siemens!"

263 comments

  1. Yeah. D�javu by sconest · · Score: 1, Troll

    Reminds me of this

    --
    Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
  2. Got to be able by pcwhalen · · Score: 0

    to make this a useable virtual touchpad as well.

    --
    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain with all your metadata.
    1. Re:Got to be able by mitheral · · Score: 1

      Read to the end of the one paragraph article and you'll see that it is.

    2. Re:Got to be able by pcwhalen · · Score: 1

      I am having a bad day. Sorry to annoy you all.

      --
      Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain with all your metadata.
  3. i don�t get it by fabiolrs · · Score: 0

    Im not the most laser specialist person in the world, so can anyone explain how the heck this thing will identify which key im "pressing" on the table?? another question: is that table in the picture a kitchen table? :))

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
  4. Very cool by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Excellent idea (although perhaps red-on-brown isn't the most ergnomic of configurations) :)

    I can see a particular application for this - people who have to author documents in many different languages. If you're a translator, or you're working on application localisation, you're quite often going to want a different key-map from your everyday layout. With this thing, a couple of clicks could give you a keyboard laid out for writing Russian, Greek, German, or whatever-you-like!

    Perhaps you could even program it to give you an "any" key... :)

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
    1. Re:Very cool by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      Instant solution to RSI problems as well.

      But you can't get a solid UNIX *click* out of it . . .

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    2. Re:Very cool by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 1

      I also agree on this being a way cool idea.... My only problem is the ergonomics of it. A true-flat and true-square keyboard has to be off the charts. I am a UNIX command-line dude who I still have problems even with shortening everything (damned CT) so ergonomics are way important to me.... I just can't wait until they come out with something fully holographic.... theat would be way UBER!!


      the greatest quote in the world is:
      "D'OH" - Homer Simpson
      *tab tab tab* Where's my TAB? Im Thirsty... ;)

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    3. Re:Very cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why couldn't you just customise the keyboard fully? It'd be neat to have an extra return key on the left and a tab on the right, maybe even mix and match the entire keyboard to suit what you're doing - I know when I'm programming there are certain characters I'd like non-shifted.

    4. Re:Very cool by seann · · Score: 1

      I'm almost 100% sure they use etched glass of some sort to make the differnt keyboard patterns.

      I may be wrong.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    5. Re:Very cool by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea (although perhaps red-on-brown isn't the most ergnomic of configurations) :)

      You think the *color scheme* is unergonomic? How about the keyboard itself?

      This keyboard takes even less physical effort to operate than a traditional soft-touch computer keyboard, which already takes almost no effort.

      I hated using manual typewriters as a kid, because I wasn't strong enough to press the keys. When I became an adult and realized that I had CTS, I realized that the ability to type is not something you get for free. Your fingers and arms need to be strong, otherwise they get stressed. Computer keyboards do nothing to exercise them.

      We need keyboards and input devices that have an operational resistance, that are physically robust and take effort to use. This new keyboard is great for, say, archaeologists in the field. Other than that, it's a step backwards.

      I shook hands with an automotive worker the other day. His grip was incredibly strong. There's no reason why mine should be less when my profession is just as manually-oriented.

      Of course I'll get flamed for this, but that's how it goes on Slashdot, where the "virtual" trumps the "real" almost as a matter of course.

  5. Speed? by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Besides the question of how quickly and accurately this device can detect your "key taps", there's also the question of the lack of tactile feedback from a physical key press slowing you down.

    Sure it's psychological, but I can remember just how painfully slow typing on my Timex Sinclair's membrane keyboard was.

    Add to that the normal lag of a character appearing on the screen, and I'll hazard a guess that using the built in hand recognisition will be the way to go.

    1. Re:Speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'll hazard a guess that using the built in hand recognisition will be the way to go.

      this sounds like the comment of someone who has never used Grafiti or has very, very neat handwriting (in which every letter is a single stroke). The handwriting recognition is so bad that the virtual onscreen keyboard is prefered by many.

    2. Re:Speed? by Kingpin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just project onto your girlfriends butt?

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
    3. Re:Speed? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll hazard a guess that using the built in hand recognisition will be the way to go.

      I don't know about you, but I can type aprox. 250 chars per minute on a regular keyboard with aprox. 0.5% errors. I can probably write around 60 chars per minute using normal handwriting. That's a 75% slowdown, if you're right. Me - I'd much rather use a keyboard.

      Besides the question of how quickly and accurately this device can detect your 'key taps"[...]

      Well, since a regular keyboard can "only" keep up with 30 chars per second (1,800 chars per minute), you "only" need to be able to translate 30 keytaps per second. Given the power of even low-end processors, I don't think this will be a problem; I'll guess that it'll be the reading-equipment, that'll be setting the limits at first.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    4. Re:Speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I still use a Northgate Omnikey 101 keyboard that has been with me since the Amiga days (thats a 12 year old keyboard). I also have several avant prime keyboards which were made from the northgate schematics and molds and are just as good. These keyboards are loud, very mechanical, and offer great feedback. I can type approximately 30% faster (around 90 wpm)on these keyboards than anything else I have tried.

      http://www.cvtinc.com/kybdfeatures.htm

    5. Re:Speed? by mjprobst · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not all that hard. I remember in my typing class (around 1988) that we were encouraged to practice on a sheet of paper marked with keyboard layout. I routinely end up tapping my fingers on a desktop to remember things I usually type, since I remember the keystrokes rather than the letters themselves.

      This would be absolutely perfect for use on a Palm device. My only real worry is that it wouldn't keep up with 120WPM typing.

    6. Re:Speed? by GroupCaptain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have to have tactile feedback, then this wouldn't be for you. I have been using a keyboard/mouse http://www.fingerworks.com/stealth_product.html with no tactile feedback for 2 months now, and love it. Works really well, and is just "different" from a regular keyboard.

      However, one huge problem I see with the projected keyboard is finding the home keys. The Stealth has little bumps on all the home keys, and they are VITAL. It allows you to QUICKLY realign the fingers every time you pause. It would be very time consuming if you had to look at the keyboard each time. The realignment is necessary since you don't get to sense hand drift at each key press the way you do with a normak keyboard.

      Adrian

    7. Re:Speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only worry would be the continued exposure to laser radiation from the emitter, which, as far as I know, is hazardous in any application.

    8. Re:Speed? by Psmylie · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be tricky during a board meeting. HR might get called in on that one.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    9. Re:Speed? by Kyzia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe the virtual keyboard could be projected onto a blank 'actual' keyboard, satisfying tactile feedback requirements and language switching requirements in one go...

    10. Re:Speed? by ragnar · · Score: 2

      Part of what you describe is an old issue. Have you ever seen the keyboard that come with the original IBM PCs? The things clicked with every keypress. It drives me nuts, but the reason was that secretaries were disoriented by not having the audio feedback from a typewriter. Silly, but true.

      So.. in the way that the example I give is silly, I think that we can all get used to it pretty easily. I would love to try out a virtual keyboard.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    11. Re:Speed? by mitheral · · Score: 1

      All hail the buckling spring keyboard! The best keyboard ever made (and as an added bonus mine doesn't have a stupid windows key). Or were you talking about the "feature" that emmitted a clicking noise from a speaker on every key press. My 3270 keyboard has that available.

    12. Re:Speed? by abischof · · Score: 2

      Or, for the link-impaired: http://www.fingerworks.com/stealth_product.html.

      Anyhow, Adrian, I see from FingerWorks' website that they also offer a product called the iGesture Pad, a combination trackpad/gesture surface. That's right -- using various gestures, you can emulate all kinds of functions :).

      This fascinates me, and I was wondering if you could tell me more about using the gestures with your Touchstream (a separate device from the iGesture Pad, but still with gesture capabilities).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    13. Re:Speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      don't be stupid. Does anyone who reads Slashdot REALLY have a girlfriend?
      The female Slashdot readers do.
    14. Re:Speed? by abischof · · Score: 2

      Upon further looking, I've discovered FingerWorks' press release for the iGesture, which gives a good overview of the device. And, I found this review as well.

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    15. Re:Speed? by abischof · · Score: 2

      For what it's worth, you can still buy those old IBM clicky-keyboards (but I'll take my Kinesis instead any day).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    16. Re:Speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was modded as interesting? Uhm. Funny, perhaps.. but interesting? hmm right.

    17. Re:Speed? by jafac · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem with the Sinclair (yes, I had one) - was not only was there no tactile feedback, but the amount of pressure required to activate a key was non trivial. I remember having to press rather hard, and I never knew how hard was hard enough, so I had to press probably twice as hard as necessary just to make sure.

      If the sensitivity issues can be worked out, (ie. actually activating a keystroke on a very light touch) - I think this could be an acceptable solution. Sure beats carrying that crappy fold-up keyboard.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    18. Re:Speed? by jafac · · Score: 2

      The realignment is only necessary if you have to switch back and forth between mouse and keyboard. Good GUI/workflow design eliminates or minimizes this need.
      (are you listening, Apple?)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    19. Re:Speed? by mickwd · · Score: 2

      You could have the attached computer make keyclick noises whenever it registers key-presses, which might help (if the time lag wasn't too great).

    20. Re:Speed? by zerus · · Score: 1

      Handwriting recognition systems can be sped up a lot with the less marks necessary on the device. I write a lot faster on my palm than on paper already (even though I kind of merge the two at times). If the handwriting were something like dots and dashes, something that your hand can do very quickly, the handwriting recognition could be made a lot faster. But most likely not ever to the level of a keyboard, but it sure could make PDA's a bit more effective

    21. Re:Speed? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      ya those are all great - but my lord is that an expensive KB.

      same with the iGesture...

      either you have a good corp card, no sense, or LOTS of spare $.

    22. Re:Speed? by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Handwriting recognition systems can be sped up a lot if they learn to trace the line of the pen rather than recognize individual glyphs ("bitmap" mode).

      It's pretty easy to read script once you realize that each letter is a unique combination of directional motions rather than a "fixed" image that needs to be duplicated perfectly each time.

    23. Re:Speed? by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Maybe the virtual keyboard could be projected onto a blank 'actual' keyboard, satisfying tactile feedback requirements and language switching requirements in one go...

      Or maybe you could just put an LCD screen on each key of a standard keyboard? More expensive, sure, but certainly not as goofy as your idea.

      Some Kinesis models are fully-programmable and cost $300, even though they are no more sturdy than a $20 keyboard. Lost in that ridiculous profit margin is the cost of the omitted liquid-crystal displays.

  6. higher quality picture by fabiolrs · · Score: 0

    the same image but on higher quality can be seen here

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
  7. looks cool, but... by jimbolaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This really does look neat, but I see two problems with it. First, it won't provide the tactile feedback of a real keyboard, so I imagine it would be easy to type between "keys." Second, notice how far away the "keyboard" is away from the Palm; I think the little screen would be difficult to read from that distance (at least it would be for a poor myopic fool like me!)

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    1. Re:looks cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typing between keys would be an issue, but try typing on a desktop. if you touchtype, it isn't that hard.

    2. Re:looks cool, but... by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      Second, notice how far away the "keyboard" is away from the Palm

      You could easily move the Palm beside the keyboard display unit, no reason to have it back that far.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    3. Re:Looks cool, but... by Zigurd · · Score: 3

      Touchpads require too much force, combined with near-zero travel - BAD! With zero travel and zero force, this should reduce RSI.

    4. Re:Looks cool, but... by tevk · · Score: 1

      I would think the sensors would present a larger problem - I, for one, rest my fingers on a conventional keyboard when "idle".

      With inturrupt sensing, when not hitting a key you would have to hold your hands above the keyboard, without touching the surface. Wouldn't that make your wrists tired after a while?

      Just a thought.

    5. Re:looks cool, but... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      Tactile feedback? Just let your nails grow long. The click of your nails on a surface would be enough. Could start a trend?

  8. Company's Website Addy... by phunhippy · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.vkb.co.il

    you can read all about it in detail there...

    1. Re:Company's Website Addy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cant expect unix people to be able to cut and paste can you?

      hehe outdated technology hehe hehe..

    2. Re:Company's Website Addy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gosh, is railing on other users for small mistakes the only thing you do? The most pathetic thing is that you didn't even add the link to the website that you made fun of the other guy for. Get a life, you weirdo.

  9. Virtual keyboard? by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2

    Now, lemme see Siemens make virtual projected phones!

  10. headline by President+Chimp+Toe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please excuse me for being a pedant, but the headline

    "Virtual keyboard a reality"

    is an oxymoron.

    1. Re:headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Please excuse me for being a pedant, but the headline "Virtual keyboard a reality" is an oxymoron.

      A hidden joke, perhaps?

  11. Re: Lawsuits everywhere! by somethingwicked · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excellent idea (although perhaps red-on-brown isn't the most ergnomic of configurations) :)

    Just wait til the lawyers get ahold of this one! Talk about an ergonomic nightmare...

    "Your honor, when my client placed his virtual keyboard on a bed of nails/hot grill/downward slope/his boss' wife/Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal, he was injured"

    *grin*

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  12. based on /.'s collective exp. w geocitities.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...(owned by Yahoo), we can't expect this to stay up much longer.
    Basically, the page linked is one picture, about 20k, of some red lines projected onto a table from a little camera-Flash sized thing connected to a palm pilot. QWERTY and other letters' names can be made out between the red lines, also projected.
    It is not clear where the feedback comes from. (The red thing doing the projecting almost certainly isn't complex enough to do live analysis of fingers based on a blurry web-cam quality images [it's really a small device, ]).
    This text is below the picture:
    A full-size fully functional virtual keyboard that can be projected and touched on any surface is shown by Siemens Procurement Logistics Services at the CeBIT fair in Hanover, northern Germany, on Monday, March 18, 2002. The virtual interface from Developer VKB Inc. from Jerusalem in Israel can be integrated in mobile phones, laptops, tablet PCs, or clean, sterile and medical environments and could be a revolution for the data entry of any mini computer. The mini projector that detects user interaction with the surface also simulates a mousepad. The biggest computer fair of the world is open for public until Wednesday, March 20, 2002. (AP Photo/Martin Meissner).

    That is all.
    [Mod this up (it's just AC) if the page gets slashdotted.]

    1. Re:based on /.'s collective exp. w geocitities.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      When's the last time you saw Yahoo get slashdotted?

  13. Does anyone at slashdot read slashdot!! by junkgui · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Was it 3 days ago that you guys ran this same story... please stop, this is starting to piss everyone off.

    1. Re:Does anyone at slashdot read slashdot!! by bpb213 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding, you SUBSCRIBE to see repeat articles.

      --

      This .sig looking for creative and witty saying.
  14. Final Fantasy interfaces by _mArk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone see the comparison with the virual interfaces they show in the Final Fantasy movie?
    I thought those were neat, but still distant future.

    Now, it seems I could project a computer interface on the wall if I want to!

    Where can i buy this?!

    1. Re:Final Fantasy interfaces by kippy · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you noticed, but all those cool holographic interfaces in FF had the Palm logo on them.

    2. Re:Final Fantasy interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Final Fantasy...

      It'd be more like little Washu's interface in Tenchi Muyo.

    3. Re:Final Fantasy interfaces by jafac · · Score: 2

      FF nothing- it's in Andromeda too. Wait - no, strike that, I didn't want to admit in public that I watched Andromeda. . . can I take that back?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Final Fantasy interfaces by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Hey, Andromeda is good. Just below SG-1 and Lexx on the par. And decent sci-fi to watch while waiting for Farscape to come back.

      Better than watching who's-doing-who week on Dawson's Smallville Creek.

  15. Re:Trippy man!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow i've never got a troll rating before.. i thought it was damn funny....

  16. not exactly a dupe, but.... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

    how is this different from these ??

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
    1. Re:not exactly a dupe, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not, this story is "exactly" a dupe.

  17. reconfiguration? by nesneros · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wonder if you can automatically re-configure it to simulate Dvorak keyboard? That would be wonderful.

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
    1. Re:reconfiguration? by D_Fresh · · Score: 1

      Good point - but I always wonder how many people out there actually use Dvorak. I do, and have for several years, but what's the percentage? Anyone out there want/need Dvorak in their keyboard devices? I'd like to think it's more than one would expect, but I suspect that most people are still stuck with QWERTY out of ignorance, laziness, or unwillingness to change. (Not to get on my high horse about it...)

      --

      Was that out loud?
    2. Re:reconfiguration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use it too. But going back to QWERTY isn't a big deal, I mean you just look at the keys and hit the letter you want! All my friends know to hit Alt-Shift to fix the problem when they use my computer...

      The Computer Science Department at Texas A&M didn't have Dvorak as a layout you could install on the lab machines until about a year ago. Sad, huh?

    3. Re:reconfiguration? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      I use dvorak. I went from 70wpm non-touch-typing qwerty to using dvorak and touch-typing. I didn't use any sort of guide or instruction, I just set my keyboard to dvorak, refused to look at the keyboard anymore and never went back.

      (Yes, the first 2 weeks were a nightmare of being slowed down to a complete crawl).

      Now I'm back to about 70 wpm and I have sprayed my Trust ergonomic (split) keyboard all black, just for the 'leetness factor and to confuse guests. (They are doomed whether they touch-type or not unless they know how to change the keyboard layout back to qwerty, since the keytops are blank...).

      On a more on-topic note, I could imagine having to take 2 pennies with blu-tak on the back of them everywhere I went with this keyboard, so I could put them where the home keys went...

      graspee

    4. Re:reconfiguration? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      And before someone points out that going from 70wpm to 70wpm is no improvement, what am I? some kind of dvorak posing freeeeeeek, then let me tell you that I used to get RSI, and now I don't. At all.

      graspee

    5. Re:reconfiguration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have already started using Dvorak if I knew how to write skandinavian characters with it. I really need those characters because I'm Finnish.
      As far I know it's impossible and therefore I can't use it.

      -Dakkus

      PS. Damn that registering progress is slow.. Öärgh.

    6. Re:reconfiguration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then let me tell you that I used to get RSI, and now I don't

      Give it a few more years more your hands to adjust... Of course at that point you can go back to qwerty?

      Personlly I only get minor RSI in my right hand. I think it's from the mouse...

    7. Re:reconfiguration? by Miles · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I sometimes look at the keyboard (which is in qwerty) when I'm typing dvorak. I suspect a psychologist might be interested in that :)

  18. How does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the article seems to have is a picture. How does it work?

  19. How does it detect keystrokes? by mnordstr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is accepted as a keystroke? I know when I'm writing I tend to hold my fingers on the buttons. And sometimes I might want to keep a button down for a period of time. How does this work on a keyboard that optically detects the strokes? And doesn't it become ergonomically really unsuitable for longer periods of writing?

    1. Re:How does it detect keystrokes? by Fucky+the+troll · · Score: 0

      Please, stop your whining. I'm sure they'll come up with answers to your questions in the future, but right now they're only just getting to grips with the technology.

      --






      Roadkill is yummy.
    2. Re:How does it detect keystrokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a really good question. Most people who are touch typers leave their fingers on the home row. It's going to be a success-determining factor in how they handle that.

      Burlynerd

    3. Re:How does it detect keystrokes? by JatTDB · · Score: 2

      This isn't the sort of device that you'd use for extended typing. Think more along the lines of those tiny thumb-keyboards, or the foldable ones, that you can get for Palms and other handhelds. These already do decently in the marketplace because people want something a little faster than stylus input, but without the bulk of a full-size keyboard. It's really about portability, not ergonomics.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
    4. Re:How does it detect keystrokes? by mnordstr · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      However, the smaller "normal" keyboards do have many good features that the bigger ones have. (you can hold your fingers on the buttons, etc.) They are very unergonomic too... I'm mostly concerned with the trouble of having to hit backspace all the time because the keyboard has typed in all kinds of junk when I'm looking the other way.

    5. Re:How does it detect keystrokes? by brain159 · · Score: 1

      The palm-branded (actually Stowaway made, IIRC) collapsable keyboards have a really nice key action, equivalent to a very good laptop keyboard. I can see this device having the advantage of the actual unit being really small (when folded, my Palm kbd is bigger than my palm IIIx - fine for in my bag, not so good for pockets).

  20. moderator on crack smells funny by Adolf+Hitroll · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, admitting a story is a duplicate is a "Troll" ?
    Wait a minute, fucking bastard !
    *I* am a troll and the guy above is "insightful".

    --
    Smile, don't click...
  21. Dear CmdrTaco by Signa1+11+on · · Score: 2, Funny

    At my office, our servers have redundant power supplies. I would recommend Slashdot getting servers with redundant power supplies also if they do not already have them. See, redundant power supplies are actually the good kind of redundant, unlike the redundant stories that are published to your web site. You see redundant power supplies serve a purpose, and redundant stories just piss people off.

    Please consider this in the future.

  22. Typing in the Dark by darkov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Neat keyboard and great for people like me who like to use computers in low or light. I'm always turning on pesky desklamps to find the keyboard.

    The lack of tactile feedback is a bummer though. Maybe if it chirped when you hit a key, though that might drive you nuts.

    1. Re:Typing in the Dark by phunhippy · · Score: 2

      Of course for tactile feedback version 2.0 would have a field where if you cross over the lines(keys) to many times or linger too long you get a big shock :) that would be some feedback... just a thought...

    2. Re:Typing in the Dark by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      Neat keyboard and great for people like me who like to use computers in low or light. I'm always turning on pesky desklamps to find the keyboard.

      Try the Kensington FlyLight. It plugs into the USB port for its power. I love it, and my GF bought one for her boss for xmas, who loves it too.

      So far it is the only Windows USB device that has never crashed. :)

    3. Re:Typing in the Dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Neat keyboard and great for people like me who like to use computers in low or light. I'm always turning on pesky desklamps to find the keyboard.

      Try turning on the monitor.

    4. Re:Typing in the Dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm always turning on pesky desklamps to find the keyboard.

      Learn to touch type. If you're already a decent typist it'll only take a few weeks, and it'll be well worth it.

  23. Oh just lovely by Diamon · · Score: 4, Funny

    The picture on the homepage shows a virtual keyboard projected on a car dash and the driver typing while driving. Don't we have enough ways for idiots to kill themselves (and others) by distracting them while driving?

    1. Re:Oh just lovely by phunhippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The picture on the homepage shows a virtual keyboard projected on a car dash and the driver typing while driving. Don't we have enough ways for idiots to kill themselves (and others) by distracting them while driving?

      --- frankly.. NO.. those people are wasting my valuable oxygen :)

    2. Re:Oh just lovely by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      At least they were honest about it. If you look at the picture again, the car appears to be driving right down the middle of the road.

    3. Re:Oh just lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also note that while he is typing on the dashboard, he is driving right up the middle of the double yellow line on the highway.

    4. Re:Oh just lovely by Sargondai · · Score: 1

      the best part about it is that the picture shows him driving DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD. Great marketing, folks.

    5. Re:Oh just lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sam: "Oops, oh yeah.." (Pulls out timebomb from jacket) "Max, where should I put this so it won't hurt anyone we know or care about?"
      Max: "Out the window, Sam - there's nothing but strangers out there." (Sam throws the bomb out the window... kaBOOM!)
      Sam: "I hope there was nobody on that bus."
      Max: "Nobody we know, at least."

    6. Re:Oh just lovely by Turing+Machine · · Score: 1

      frankly.. NO.. those people are wasting my valuable oxygen :)

      The trouble is that they don't just remove themselves from the gene pool, they also tend to take out other drivers, pedestrians, small children.....

  24. Cool but it needs to be integrated by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 1
    If you still have to carry around a piece of hardware, what good is it?

    Hopefully they will work on making it smaller so it can be integrated into PDA's and cell phones. From the article it looks like the direction they want to head.

  25. This is no spacesaver. by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, a virtual keyboard take up no space !! WRONG !!

    look at the size of that projector thingy. it's big! Those rubber/cloth folding keyboards are a lot more practical. A flat object is much more pocket-friendly than boxsy objects.

    The formfactor is important here. for a desktop, the size doesn't matter that much and a normal kb is the way to go.

    1. Re:This is no spacesaver. by frunch · · Score: 1

      Plus imagine the power suckage! A collapsible keyboard is great because you just snap your Palm in it and can type. Here you've got wires to hook up, and I'm SURE this thing can't have a long battery life

      But all of this doesn't stop the fact that it *looks* reeeeaaaally cool.

    2. Re:This is no spacesaver. by jafac · · Score: 2

      Shrink it, the display, and the CPU into a pen-sized device that could be stood upright with folding legs onto any flat surface, and you'd have a killer PDA.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  26. Play by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
    I hope they didn't let anyone play with it. We wouldn't want Micro$oft to get in a snit again, now would we.

    I can't wait for Micro$oft to crash and burn.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be counting the minutes until you're moderated as Flamebait. Try contributing something next time.

  27. NICE! by MikeDX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Absolutely lovely, now when my girlfriend wants attention when im on the computer all she has to do is lie naked on me and i'll se her naked body as a keyboard :)) Now all we need is a mouse like this and we can perform the JEDI MOUSE TRICK.

    1. Re:NICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need to be carefull the mouse doesn't get caught by the pussy

    2. Re:NICE! by sahala · · Score: 4, Funny
      Absolutely lovely, now when my girlfriend wants attention when im on the computer all she has to do is lie naked on me and i'll se her naked body as a keyboard :)) Now all we need is a mouse like this and we can perform the JEDI MOUSE TRICK.

      I guess that will take care of that whole tactile feedback issue that a few other posters have noted.

    3. Re:NICE! by Ahchay · · Score: 1

      All back to yours for the next UKVAC meet then?

      Cheers
      Chris

    4. Re:NICE! by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2, Funny

      You won't need the mouse. I'm pretty sure you can find a suitable joystick.

    5. Re:NICE! by lpontiac · · Score: 5, Funny
      when my girlfriend wants attention when im on the computer all she has to do is lie naked on me and i'll se her naked body as a keyboard :)) Now all we need is a mouse like this

      Dude, just reach down between the legs. It's like the trackpoint on a notebook :)

    6. Re:NICE! by sharkey · · Score: 2

      It's like the trackpoint on a notebook :)

      If, that is, you can find it. American males, for example, tend to be very deficient in this particular regard.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:NICE! by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Now all we need is a mouse like this and we can perform the JEDI MOUSE TRICK.

      Perhaps you could also simulate the IBM-laptop 'nipple mouse'.

    8. Re:NICE! by PyromanFO · · Score: 1

      Deficient in which regard? The girlfriend or the trackpoint? I never cared for the trackpoints much myself, but the girlfriend on the other hand ;)

    9. Re:NICE! by lpontiac · · Score: 1
      It's like the trackpoint on a notebook :)

      If, that is, you can find it. American males, for example, tend to be very deficient in this particular regard.

      Indeed. When I posted I was half expecting to be modded down by people who couldn't tell what the hell I was going on about.

    10. Re:NICE! by Mr.Mustard · · Score: 3, Funny
      Indeed. When I posted I was half expecting to be modded down by people who couldn't tell what the hell I was going on about.

      Now why would you think that? Slashdotters may not have much experience, but we have read a lot of books...

      --
      fnord
    11. Re:NICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well, we saved your ass in the war, so shut your mouth and watch the Jerry Lewis flicks.

    12. Re:NICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, just reach down between the legs. It's like the trackpoint on a notebook :)

      Then get her to turn over and play a little Counterstrike. Your cries of "I own your ass, bitch" will be taken in an entirely different context.

    13. Re:NICE! by Phsyco · · Score: 1

      "are you sure it was a book, are you sure it wasn't.......... nothing."
      -brian, from family guy

      hurry it up, i'm russian

    14. Re:NICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I posted I was half expecting to be modded down by people who couldn't tell what the hell I was going on about.

      Actually, I can't, but that's cause I don't know what a trackpoint is!

  28. Simply Put ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GAY.

  29. Slower than writing it on paper with a pen by fruey · · Score: 0
    Can't see that any real typists will ever use this. Can't see it being useful on a train or in any moving vehicle. Can't see it being allowed in planes. Medical use, sure, I can see that one.

    Useful gimmick for your Palm? In a meeting you say suddenly "can you clear me a keyboard sized space while I project my virtual keyboard to type notes at a small amount of words per minute" and such.

    Perhaps you will spill your coffee on the projection area and end up writing a masterpiece, like random monkeys in front of typewriters?

    Anybody also note that it comes from Israel. Boycott it if you support human rights and equal opportunities and all that. Then, at least, you can participate in a _real_ revolution and not some virtual fad revolution that apparently, happen EVERY day with some new gimmick that is going to revolutionise our lives.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Slower than writing it on paper with a pen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boycott it if you support human rights...

      Ah yes, we can't have the evil Israelis being the slightest bit inconvenient to people wearing bombs.

    2. Re:Slower than writing it on paper with a pen by fruey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can't believe, in this age of information, that CmdrTaco could post something like that.

      I see you are on the Israeli side, but even if you are, you are nulling your argument by calling the Palestinian people scum.

      I cry inside to think that intelligent people have not analysed the situation, and the reason the Palestinians are fighting, and just diminish them to "scum".

      I'm disappointed.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:Slower than writing it on paper with a pen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Palestinians aren't scum because of what they are fighting for. They are scum because they teach their children to blow themselves up or stand around Palestinian snipers so that Israeli counterfire may hit one of them. They are scum because they danced in the streets and celebrated as the WTC collapsed. This behavior defies the fundamental constructs of human decency to the point that the Palestinians have demonstrated that they do not deserve to be regarded as a legitimate group stuggling against a regime they oppose, but rather that they should be collectively shot like the dogs they are.

  30. Nevermind the virtual keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to the Yahoo ad on the same page as the keyboard picture:

    I can lose 10 pounds in two weeks!

    That's what lazy-ass programmers need more than a virtual keyboard.

  31. Cool by redhog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hm, why not turn of that projector, and you'l have an invisible keyboard, that one must know where if is to tap in things on. Perfect for placing outside ones door as a lock (log in with username and password, without any feedback at all, to gain access to the house). In addition, it will look damn cool when one just move ones hands in strange patterns on a totally normal table next to the door, and the door magically opens. And when someone examines the table, it is just a normal table...

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    1. Re:Cool by DJPenguin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Grrr... damn these confining mod point things. May mod as insightful, but i'd much rather mod as "Cunning" !

    2. Re:Cool by mr3038 · · Score: 2
      [...] Perfect for placing outside ones door as a lock (log in with username and password, without any feedback at all, to gain access to the house). [...]

      Just when you thought getting the key into keyhole was hard while being drunk there's a guy suggesting that you should type random patterns (no words in passwords) into invisible keyboard!

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    3. Re:Cool by monk · · Score: 1

      Or project the keyboard synced to the surface in your HMD only. You can see it, but no one else can. And the "keyboard" can be expanded to include macro symbols etc. to speed access to common commands like, "Secure perimeter and loose the hounds..."

      --
      [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  32. Virtual Keyboard by Signa1+11+on · · Score: 1

    I have a hard enough time finding keyboards that I like and trying to type on a table top sounds like a bad idea. I'm pretty picky about key travel (the distance that a key moves when pressed). I really like the small key travel of laptops and I searched around for weeks before finding a desktop keyboard that had an acceptable key travel. Even if you're not anal about key travel like I am, it's nice to have some sense that your keys are in the right place by having something move. I imagine it would be pretty easy to get lost trying to type on a table with no feedback from the table.

    1. Re:Virtual Keyboard by Fucky+the+troll · · Score: 0

      Maybe correct application of the soundbug would work? Wire each key press to a sound and it'd make the table vibrate a little every time you hit a key. The sound feedback would make it a bit easier, and you could tap out some drum n bass while you're at it.

      --






      Roadkill is yummy.
  33. Triangulation by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

    Using two or more sensors to pick up reflections from the interupted beam, you should be able to pinpoint exactly where you are pressing. And since you know where the emitter is and where the surface is, you know which button you pressed.

    It is, obviously a bit more complicated - you need only consider the option of using your SOs buttocs as a keypad to figure that one out :-)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:Triangulation by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1
      Huh? and how about touch tyypists? I have 8 fingers hovering over the keys and my thumb on the spacebar, hot the hell is it going to detect wich of my fingers and thumbs is pressing on the table? How will it detect when my thumb is hitting the spacebar, when the thumb goes under the other fingers (yes I know it's not proper touch typing, but it's my own style of speed typing).

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    2. Re:Triangulation by Guignol · · Score: 1

      I think your're assuming this virtual keyboard is intended to be a nice keyboard by itself.
      But I don't think it is, it's just a better keyboard for handhelds or other very small devices that cannot have any decent keyboard at all.
      Any real keayboard will be better than this, wether or not you are a touch typist.
      This will however be much more useful than what we currently have for handhelds.

  34. Re:Typing in the Dark with feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, one possibility is that if you hit the wrong key, or mispell a word, that the device can zap your pinky fingers with the laser and burn a hole in your finger. Hmmm! something feels warm. Good God, my finger has been zapped/cut off. Hence, no need for tactile feedback now. Just use the handicap voice recognition system.

  35. I like this one better by loconet · · Score: 1

    I don't know, might be the huge pencil sharpener looking projector but, I like the keyboard talked about on this story much better than this new one.

    --
    [alk]
  36. how this works by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing based on the photo. This might be totally wrong, but it's the best explanation I can some up with:

    I doubt if they're using galvanometers and mirrors to scan that image onto the desktop. For one, they're too expensive, and also that pattern is way too complex to draw with even the fastest galvos.

    More likely it's a hologram etched onto a lens, with a really bright laser diode behind it. I'm skeptical as to how visible that keyboard would be except in complete darkness.

    So how to they determine which key you're pressing? Well, if they were scanning the image onto the surface, it would just be a matter of using a single photo transistor to measure the brightness of the dot as it moves across the surface. If the brightness changes at a particular point, then you know there's an obstruction. You can map this to a particular key by taking into account the positions of the fingers in the normal typing position. Multiple keys might be obstructed at one time - you only count the one that's closest to the light source.

    If it's a static image, it's a little harder. The only way I can think of is to either use a CCD to to capture the whole image, or use a mechanical photo interruptor to blank out a section of the image at a time.

    If it's cost effective and it really works, this is a damned impressive product.

    1. Re:how this works by NoBeardPete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This doesn't sound quite right to me. If that was the case, you would trigger the keys when your fingers will still in the air, possibly even a few inches off the table. I mean, you'll start obstructing the beam to the space bar while your finger is still in the air above, say, the "y" key.

      Perhaps it uses a LADAR type system to get a specific location on your finger. That sounds more feasible to me, anyway.

      --
      Arrr, it be the infamous pirate, No Beard Pete!
    2. Re:how this works by Chase · · Score: 1

      They must have applied for a patent on the technology. I couldn't find it but the details would be there.

      --
      -==-
    3. Re:how this works by Chase · · Score: 1
      From their website

      VKB has developed a highly efficient method for projecting an optical image of a keyboard onto a surface. In addition, VKB has developed a detection method through several proprietary developments for the accurate and reliable detection of user interaction, such as typing or cursor control functions (e.g. mouse or touch-pad controls). VKB has resolved all the technological hurdles required to make a practical virtual interface. Include minimizing the power consumption, minimal component size, simple processing, high accuracy and ease of use. VKB has filed numerous patents on its core technology and related applications.

      --
      -==-
    4. Re:how this works by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 1
      Somehow, I doubt that this beastie is capturing sequences of CCD images, processing them in real time, and feeding the screen "keypress" data.

      I'd buy that it's a rasterized barcode scanner bundled with some cool code. Sure, you might get some obstruction/multiple-hit issues, but I'd imagine you could solve them with an elegant enough algorithm, taking into account length of time of obstruction, sequences of obstruction based on last direction (i.e., if J, M, and are obstructed, you're "pressing" the J).

      I wonder if there are any reflectivity issues, though, between different skin types, cosmetics (nail polish), ambient light conditions, etc.

      Cool tech, though -- it'd rock to get a definitive answer!

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    5. Re:how this works by Nyarly · · Score: 2
      VKB has developed a highly efficient method for projecting an optical image of a keyboard onto a surface. In addition, VKB has developed a detection method through several proprietary developments for the accurate and reliable detection of user interaction, such as typing or cursor control functions (e.g. mouse or touch-pad controls). VKB has resolved all the technological hurdles required to make a practical virtual interface. Include minimizing the power consumption, minimal component size, simple processing, high accuracy and ease of use. VKB has filed numerous patents on its core technology and related applications.

      How amazingly informative. I mean "un". Amazingly UNinformative. Babelfish's new marketdroid-to-english option produces:

      We figured out how to project a keyboard. We also figured out to make it an actual keyboard. &ltnull statement>. It works quite well. And we patented it.

      (Funny how marketdroid-to-english produces all those &ltnull statement> markers...) As how this actually works, this description alone would be enough for me not to be interested in this device: it sounds like snake oil. Especially because the above quote comes from the "Technology" section of VKB's amazingly sparse website.

      I mean, who releases something like this without a How's This Work section? Unless of course there's nothing more that a red keyboard projected from a very small box. Do we have any first hand accounts of this thing?

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
    6. Re:how this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe it uses the sound of the fingers hitting the table to get their position

  37. real keyboard for handhelds by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but i don't really see the utility of having to project a virtual keyboard onto a flat surface. I use the stowaway portable keyboard with my iPaq, and the thing rules. I can use it on my lap, in a meeting, on a plane...almost anywhere.

    I think you'd look kinda foolish fiddling around with you crotch on an airplane, trying to explain "Oh, no...no, no - don't call the sky marshalls, i'm typing!"

    I think this is a case of technlogy for technolgies sake.

    For now, i'll use my keyboard occasionally, and my hand predominantly, with my handheld, thank you uvery much.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  38. But how does it work, dammit !? by helix_r · · Score: 1


    How does the virtual keyboard detect keypresses?

    I can't believe no one is talking about that on slashdot!

  39. Backup often! by InsaneCreator · · Score: 4, Funny

    You have the keyboard projected on you desk and your cat comes running by, stepping on the keys...

    [Ctrl] + a
    [Del]
    [Ctrl] + s

    ...dead cat.

    1. Re:Backup often! by FuraxCerebro · · Score: 0

      No, everything allright because you are using linux and ctrl+a don't select all the text !!! :-)

      Sorry for the pure english...need to go back to school...

    2. Re:Backup often! by FuraxCerebro · · Score: 0

      Well, I should said in vi.. but.. anyway...
      ok.. I will go back to school finally ! ;-)

    3. Re:Backup often! by webprogrammer · · Score: 1
      You have a keyboard sitting on you desk and your cat comes running by, stepping on the keys...

      [Ctrl] + a
      [Del]
      [Ctrl] + s

      ...dead cat.

      --
      Tim ODonnell (trying to be the most
  40. slashdot editors asleep again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello left hand, meet Mr right hand. Nice one Slashdot!

  41. It would be cool if by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could blow this up and then walk on it. Maybe I'd get more exercise this way.

    1. Re:It would be cool if by White+Shadow · · Score: 2
      I could blow this up and then walk on it. Maybe I'd get more exercise this way.
      Hmm, seems like you could make a Dance Dance Revolution pad this way.
  42. Cool then by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

    With a keyboard like that, spilling coke on it won't be a terrific problem anymore :)

    1. Re:Cool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're posting to slashdot and you're worried about spilling Coke on your keyboard?!!

      You could have gone for the hattrick and pointed out that it would be an aid to pr0n viewing since the keys wouldn't stick together.

      sheesh. amature.

  43. sound feedback by fabiolrs · · Score: 0

    Im worried about the feedbacks that a normal keyboard produces and that this virtual one will not. Sure its a great product, but feedbacks normal keyboards does helps us a lot. Maybe the little box that projects the keyboard could have a little sound like a normal key press ever time you succesfully press a key!

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
  44. MCP, keyboard please... by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    Ah, finally, I get to put my air-typing - practiced for years since watching Tron - to good use.

  45. Small keys ? by TheFalken · · Score: 1

    Only problem I can see is that the top row of keys is much smaller than the bottom one due to the way the image is projected (i.e. no correction for angled plane, like road signs painted on roads look strectched if your not in a car).

  46. Secure ? by mirko · · Score: 2, Redundant

    The problem with infra-red keyboards is that it becomes easy to just sniff what their user sends to his computer...
    With such devices, won't there be similar issues ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Secure ? by dossen · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be any easier than doing the same to a regular keyboard. After all, you're not "sending" stuff between the "keyboard" and the reciever, the reciever "sees" where your fingers go.

  47. BWAHAHAHA!! by psxndc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No tactile feedback! The hunt-and-peckers will rise again! Viva La Revolution!

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:BWAHAHAHA!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is "informative"?!

    2. Re:BWAHAHAHA!! by psxndc · · Score: 1
      dude, it's my post and _I_ don't even understand the modding of it. It was supposed to be funny, not interesting OR informative. *shrug*

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  48. User defined keyboard? by Arricc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So.. as its virtual, can I change the layout and add user defined hot-keys and get rid of all those ones I don't use?

    Can it emulate the layout of a variety of keyboards - Sparc style or multilanguage?

    1. Re:User defined keyboard? by TheSync · · Score: 2

      I don't think it is scanned - that would be a heck of a laser scanning job, in terms of angle and speed. It would be very expensive.

      The display probably comes from illuminating a comptuer-generated diffraction grating with a laser diode. No moving parts! But not customizable.

      This is the same technology they use for projecting hearts, dollar signs, and skulls from laser pointers.

  49. Patent Infringment? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

    Wow, it's remarkably similar to the lead item in this recent story. What a rip off! :-)

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  50. heard it all before by stramash · · Score: 1

    When I was a student a few years ago my HCI lecturer talked about a 'keyboard' for mobile phones/ PDAs which would actually consist of sensors attached to the users lower arms. The signals from the tendons (muscle?) movement would be fed back to the PDA via infra-red signals.

    The catch? You had to be a perfect touch typist to ensure that the system could correctly interpret, for example, a strech and tap with the left index finger as a 'Y'. Not much good for those of us who skipped secretarial studies in favour of more gym!

    Anyone every heard of such a thing?

  51. Magic? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    I don't know - I didn't design this device, I'm just making an educated guess. If you have a better idea than triangulation, then please post it :-)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  52. Must your hands hover? by n-baxley · · Score: 2

    I hadn't thought of this before, but do you need to keep your hands hovered above the "keys" all the time? I usually find that my fingers are resting on the keys until I hit them. Also, does it measure you hitting the key, or your finger moving down toward the "key"? If it's motion, how much motion is needed?

    Questions, questions, questions ... but what about answers?

  53. Touch Typers will be put off by lute3 · · Score: 1
    After all, we didn't need to learn how to feel the keys if we still have to look down at a projection to see where on the table to tap. Force feedback is totally necessary for a virtual keyboard.

    I won't be satisfied until we're using force fields!

  54. Natural Virtual? by bje2 · · Score: 1

    is there gonna be a virtual natural keyboard??? i hope so, cause i don't wanna get virtual carpal-tunnel syndrome...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  55. But... by Daftspaniel · · Score: 1

    What happens if you spill coffee on it?

  56. My vision for the future... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2, Redundant

    1. A keyboard like this, except nothing is actually projected on the table; only I see it because it's projected on my retina by the virtual monitor from yesterday's story.

    2. Oh by the way, my computer's display is also projected on my retina.

    3. A microphone/earplug that allows me to issue voice commands to the computer without a visible mic.

    4. Wireless network, of course.

    I could sit in Barnes and Noble freaking people out, talking to myself and tapping on the table.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
    1. Re:My vision for the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "I could sit in Barnes and Noble freaking people out, talking to myself and tapping on the table."

      Hell you can do that now if you want, and all you need is three or four expressos.

  57. How to solve the tactile feedback problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its simple really, just have mechanical keys glued to the end of your fingers. Hey presto! Mechanical feedback!

  58. Think you can adapt to a virtual keyboard? by lute3 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Take a test using touch typing:
    http://www.typingtest.com

    Now, try it again--only hitting the keys that you have visually checked the locations of.

    I was surprised at how high a score I got (touch typing).. I hadn't taken a test since high school. Years of IT/programming work just seem to hone typing skills.

    1. Re:Think you can adapt to a virtual keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how come no one has asked how touch typists are supposed to find the home row? Those bumps are on your keyboard for a reason, people!

  59. As seen earlier by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    as seen earlier:

    Virtual Keyboard [slashdot.org] by CmdrTaco with 248 comments on 05:27 PM -- Wednesday November 14 2001
    Great gadgets at CeBIT TechnologyPosted by timothy on 10:08 AM -- Monday March 18 2002

    I also remember seeing photos, etc a few months back. so the company PR geek must be happy about making into Yahoo, etc.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:As seen earlier by systemaster · · Score: 1

      Actually this is not the only CeBIT gadget to get talked about more than once...I'm too lazy to look for that articles now...but hey this is /. if you want new news look somewhere else.

      --
      LinuxWorx
      Spelling errors are intentional as are gramatical error
  60. Patent #6,353,428: looks good to me. by WEFUNK · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know this is kinda a dupe - but a pretty good one for a more focused discussion. When I saw this in the paper today, I thought "finally, maybe somebody legitimately patented something of interest to Slashdot readers". Siemens appears to have at least one, fairly broad patent on the device/process.

    Check out Patent #6,353,428 on the USPTO website:

    "Method and device for detecting an object in an area radiated by waves in the invisible spectral range"

    The first claim is as follows:

    "1. A system for detection of an object in an area irradiated by waves in an invisible spectral range, the system comprising:

    a projector configured such that a video image is projectable onto the area;

    a device for emitting waves in the invisible spectral range configured such that the area is substantially illuminated;

    a reception device configured such that the reception device registers the irradiated area, the reception device being specifically balanced for an invisible spectral range corresponding to the waves; and

    a computer configured with a recognition algorithm, whereby the object irradiated by the emitted waves is detected using the recognition algorithm."


    The patent seems pretty broad in that it uses phrases like "a reception device..." and "a recognition algorithm" to cover the process, but reading the specification makes it clear that the focus is on "virtual" keyboards, mousepads, and presentation pointing, and it is a bit more specific about the actual means of detection etc.

    All and all, without being an expert in the prior art or patent law, I think this one actually seems like a pretty good patent (If you believe in patents at all, of course). Also a pretty cool invention. Obviously it will have to be improved and smallified before being really useful (and integratable into my cell phone, watch, ring, etc.), but they seem to be off to a great start!

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    1. Re:Patent #6,353,428: looks good to me. by fizban · · Score: 1

      Patents are good

      Misuse of patents is bad

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    2. Re:Patent #6,353,428: looks good to me. by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      The patent seems pretty broad ... but reading the specification makes it clear that the focus is on "virtual" keyboards, mousepads, and presentation pointing ...

      The whole idea of a patent (from the author's point of view) is to be as broad as possible, to cover as many areas and as much technology as it exists and may exist through the patent's lifetime. That's a patent lawyer's job. The patent office tries to whittle down the broadness. That's their job. It's an adversarial process. That's why getting a patent takes about 3 years.

      The only thing that legally matters in a patent are its claims. The rest is merely illustrative.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    3. Re:Patent #6,353,428: looks good to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel does not have to conform to any silly
      patent laws. They are not bound by laws against
      murder, torture, stealing, etc. Why would
      they feel bound by patent law.

    4. Re:Patent #6,353,428: looks good to me. by WEFUNK · · Score: 1
      The only thing that legally matters in a patent are its claims. The rest is merely illustrative.
      For the most part, I agree, but when claims are made in this "means...function" manner, without identifying the means within the claim, I understand that legal precedent has used the specification to interpret the "means". Yes the claims are all that really matters, but I believe that the "illustrative" specifications can be (and have been) used by judges to interpret and define the claims. Also, the author hopes that the independent claims will be interpreted in the broadest fashion, but falls back on the other claims (independent and dependent) if the broader claim is invalidated by prior art etc.

      I believe the intrepretation of the "means...function" approach is why David Pressman and other patent attorney's recommend including a separate claim describing the invention as a process (which this one does, and does so with greater limitations than the first claim). Obviously IANAL, but just interested in this area.
      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  61. I thought about this YEARS ago by qurob · · Score: 1

    Back when the U Force controller for the Nintendo came out.

    But then again, that didn't work very well either. Let's hope invisible devices have improved in the last 15 years!

  62. Still not there yet, but we're getting close. by Uttles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Virtual keyboard, wow! This is really a cool invention. It's a great step forward for mini computing. Hell, it's a great step forward for all computing, I'm sure there will be many applications for just about every device that requires wide ranging input. The problem is, like a lot of folks have said here, that there's no tactile feedback, which will slow down the expert no-look typers. I myself don't look at the keyboard and type rather quickly, and I know for certain that without the feeling of the keys I would not be able to type at all. OK, so we're going to have to actually look at the virtual keyboard to do any typing... that's a hinderance, but it's still better than no keyboard.

    We're still not to the point of "easy" data input for all computer devices. When you think about it, typing on a standard keyboard really isn't that easy. Even when you get used to it, you still make mistakes. The real "revolution" of computer input devices will be when some completely new idea comes along about how to send get input from a human and send the characters to the computer. It will take something like a glove that reads finger movement and types based on combinations of twitches, or maybe a perfect speech recognition system that can figure out the context of your words and spell everything magically. Those might not be the best solutions, or even possible for that matter, but it's going to take something like that before computing input devices get to the point where they're actually "easy" to use.

    --

    ~ now you know
  63. Wtf? by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    Hey, it could just be me, but didn't some Israeli firm offer the same thing at CeBIT not too long ago? I think it was posted here on /. just a few days back... Has Siemens been sticking their spies in other companies' dark crevices again? Jynxy

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
  64. Wasyu's keyboard from Tenchi Muyo by nexusone · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is for them to do it in a 3D holographic keyboard like Wasyu uses in Tenchi Muyo!!!

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  65. So much for touch typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half the reason I can touch type so fast is the keys themselves. The shapes of the keys, the throw, the sound, the dimples on the f and j keys (avant prime keyboard) all add up to give me great feedback. I never have to look at the keyboard. These guys need to sell a thin sheet that has some key shaped ridges to provide some feedback so us 'touch' typists can make the transition.

  66. Will cause more auto accidents than cell phones. by fennell · · Score: 1

    The company websitehas a picture of a Palm user projecting the keyboard on his dashboard. brilliant.

  67. Hey Beavis, check it out by GafTheHorseInTears · · Score: 0, Funny

    Huh... huh huh...

    You said "Siemens".

    Huh huh huh...

    --
    "You're just scared like a little white pussy. I'll fuck you till you love me, you faggot!"
  68. Looks cool, but... by dipfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...there's three words that would worry me about using this as a keyboard for any length of time: Repetitive Strain Injury.

    Touch-pad keyboards have pretty much been banned on office equipment since the mid-1980s because although they allowed users to type at great speed, they also caused massive incidence of RSI. Since then keyboards have all required definite "clicks" that need greater muscle movement.

    Of course this would be fine for brief use (on a PDA or similar). And it does look cool.

  69. Virtual monitor by Captain+Zion · · Score: 1

    Now, if it could project a virtual screen from the other side, you would have a virtual monitor too. But you would need a table _and_ a wall, but that would be the ultimate portable computer :)

  70. further inovations by Chayce · · Score: 1

    Add a small power supply and a projection monitor and it would become possible to have a portable the size of a ciggeratte pack which could operate on any light colored tabletop...

    --
    I like replies better than Karma, even if they are flames, because that tells me I got someone thinking.
  71. Simpsons (Re:Cool) by Scrooge919 · · Score: 1

    Another case of life imitating art...

    "Sure, sure... I'll just type it up on my invisible typewriter..."

  72. I amm usinfg onwe now!@!! by gosand · · Score: 2, Redundant
    I an usinf onr of thesw keyvoardss noow, and it id rallly cool.

    (I posted almost an identical comment to this on a previous very similar slashdot story, and I got +4 Funny.)
    *crosses fingers*

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  73. Tactile, schmactile by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those of us who learned how to type on manual typewriters, with the notice bell that dinged 5 spaces before the end of the line, and the platen return arm that you had to thwack, pressing a key with anything less than an authoritative clunk would just get you laughed at. Sure it bruised the fingertips, but we liked it that way! When a man was typing back then, he knew it, by God! Then came the newfangled electric typewriters, that only took a minicing little tap, and then these nutty TV-typewriter "word processor" things (with a keyboard that's not even decently attached to the rest of it, I might add!) that hardly even need you to push the keys at all! And now, a laser-typewriter type thing that doesn't even *have* keys? You might as well just dictate to the thing and have it magically type up your words for you like some kind of plastic secretary!

    You kids think you're so smart with your rams and drivers and codes and all. I, for one, still keep my trusty can of 3-in-1 oil next to my computer. I haven't had to use it much lately, but just wait till something jams in this thing, and that smart-ass punk Corey is stumped... then we'll see who knows how to fix a broken office machine, by God!

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Tactile, schmactile by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      On my first computer, a Digital Group Z-80 (gosh, that sure dates me!), I used a Baudot -- yes, Baudot -- teletype for hard-copy output. To keep it running, every so often I would open up the cover and liberally spray the guts with WD-40. True.

  74. Finally, no more squinting! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    I'll be able to type my review of "LAZER PINK FLOYD" at the show!

  75. And Then.... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be funny if someone invented the voice commanded computer.......

    Oh wait....Someone has.....no need for keyboards! DOH!

    --
    Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  76. A solution to the lack of tactile feedback by samrolken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many people have pointed out many times in the comments here the very obvious problem regarding the lack of tactile feedback with this keyboard system. There doesn't seem to be a good way around that one.
    The only thing I could think of are little things on your fingers that give force feedback "clicks". That would possibly make it feel a bit more realistic. Perhaps they could use the technology of the Logitech iFeel mouse, just on a miniature scale, and one for each finger. The same things giving the feedback could also provide more information as to where the fingers are and what they're doing, which would possibly enhance the ability of the device to tell what you mean to be typing.
    For me, there will always be the IBM Model M keyboard.

    --
    samrolken
    1. Re:A solution to the lack of tactile feedback by jafac · · Score: 2

      Well, someday they'll use force-feilds for tactile feedback for this kind of thing. Until then, we'll just have to suffer.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  77. Been there, but not done that by pieterh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I tried to invent something like this in 1994 or so. There are so many advantages to the concept, not just because it replaces a fold-out keyboard. You can chose your layout arbitrarily. Put the Enter key anywhere. Make a DVORAK. You can make the whole keyboard larger or smaller as you like. Place the keyboard on your knees when you're in a cramped plane seat.

    This combined with direct retinal stimulated displays would make for more portable computing.

    One idea I had to recognise finger positions (and I've also seen this announced since then) was for a sensor wristband that could learn what you were typing from measuring the nervous signals and tendon positions through the wrist.

    Roll on the day when we can throw away those real keyboards! It will be about 50 years too late.

  78. I can see it now.... by Dukebytes · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is going to make the chat rooms a lot more fun when your cat "walks" over your key board.

    I think that kitty is going to dig this one.... :)

    --

    FreeBSD: Nothing runs like a daemon with a pitch fork.
  79. Mimeo may be substantially limiting to this by endoboy · · Score: 1
    Don't have time to read the relevant patents in depth this morning, but at first glance it seems that the Mimeo "virtual whiteboard" would be a significant piece of prior art that would limit the scope of this patent...

    and, btw, IANAL

  80. The only problem with virtual keyboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is if you use them on wearable computers, you look like a zombie.

  81. asdf;lkj by 3ryon · · Score: 2

    That's what you'll get if you rest your fingers on the home row. Not significant? Try typing for a few hours without ever resting your fingers on the keys.

  82. MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD THIS UP

  83. Neat, but not meant for long-term use... by Traicovn · · Score: 1

    I like the whole idea, but doubt it would be very useable as a long term keyboard given the egronomics of it. I can see a lot of people getting carpal tunnel syndrome from something like this. It's not MEANT for long-term use though, it's just meant to write stuff down real quick like you would with sometihng like JOT or Graffiti.
    Definitely a cool looking idea though. I wonder if they can make it any smaller so it could fit ON BOARD a cellphone or pda... although I am sure that this is possible.

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  84. That troll is NOT CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't believe that stupid troll. He's not worth it. Did you really think that the real CmdrTaco would have a six digit user ID, have had less than 500 posts, practically all of them with a score of -1?

    About the Israel thing: I agree that Slashdot should not blatently publish "all those cool gadgets coming out of that country". Israel has been violating human and international rights for years. Please don't treat them as your average West-European country, because they aren't. Remember the opression, humiliation and violence they have been inflicting upon the Palestinians for decades!

    The vast majority of them are NOT ruthless terrorists. Imagine the many innovations in technology that many young talented Palestinians could have developed if they had been given the chance.

    1. Re:That troll is NOT CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, he is the real CmdrTaco on.

      hehe. idiots.
  85. Combo With Cellphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Imagine this built into the side of a Cellphone... lets you TYPE text messages easily, instead of messing with the 3x3 keypads. if condensed, the cellphone would hardly increase in size, yet be way more useful.

    Beyond7.com - Modern Art Watersculptures

  86. Similar Keyboard by mjduff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I made a (somewhat) similar keyboard to help myself overcome RSI symptoms. Each key is concave, and has an infrared beam across the top so no pressure is needed to activate it. It takes some getting used to, but works great and has helped my arms/wrists immensely. See it at: http://web.mit.edu/mjduff/www/keyboard/

  87. Re: Lawsuits everywhere! by sharkey · · Score: 2

    ...placed his virtual keyboard on...Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal...

    It's his own damn fault for not closing his eyes. Like sticking your tongue in a light socket and expecting to NOT get zapped. Dip.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  88. Meta keys and M&Ms by ghmh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just wondering if the image changes when you 'press' the shift key, or how it recognises key modifiers like control, alt etc. etc.

    Hmmm, might make using emacs a bit difficult?

    Does bring up all sorts of amusing possibilities though - Just imagine someone dropping a handful of M&M's onto your desk only to find they've accidentally reset your machine, or dialled Mongolia, or emailed your boss for you...

  89. Oxymoron by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    So is "Slashdot Editor" for that matter.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  90. My virtual keyboard is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was surfing pr0n, and I got Siemens all over my virtual keyboard... :(

  91. Life immitates dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another example of how life sooner or later immitates that particular cartoon.

  92. virtual hack by r00tyroot · · Score: 1

    It hasn't been long since the data-intercept-via-LED story was posted... I wonder if someone will figure out a way to determine what is being typed on the virtual keyboard by virtue of listening to the resonance of the table/boss' wife/bugblatter beast of traal and reconstructing the keyboard input. Does this seem too farfetched? Waste of time?

  93. Re: Lawsuits everywhere! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Your Honor, my client has an image of a standard 101 key keyboard burned into his retinas after looking directly into this dangerous mechanism to see 'if it was on'"

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  94. Like the guys in my office aren't annoying enough by switcha · · Score: 1
    "Rich, quit tapping your fingers on your desk! You're driving me nuts!"

    "I'm just working, here."

    "Fine, work all you want, just quit drumming your fingers."

    ...dubba dub dub dubba... dub dub dubba dub...

    "Rich, dammit! Didn't you hear me?"

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  95. Anime Inspired? by Malic · · Score: 1

    For anyone that watches Tenchi Muyo, this seems straight out of the lab of Washu The Great. She frequently summoned up a full virtual terminal in mid air with no visable projector.

    I suppose that part is coming next...

    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  96. think beyond keyboard by RumorControl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I write touch screen applications. But the hardware cost is really prohibitive to appeal where it is needed by the computer illiterate masses.

    This device could replace the screen, computer; the whole setup while allowing participants to touch regions of a surface to answer questions. Don't think of coding with this, think of remote distributed input devices with zero ware, instant customization and limitless input devices available.

  97. Tactile response by BierGuzzl · · Score: 3
    For those of you whining about tactile feedback, consider directing your energy into some ways this problem might be solved...

    Beyond the obvious keyboard click, produce different tones for different keypresses, so you know if you're hitting two keys with one finger without even looking

    Create a device that uses microelectronic pulses carefully directed at different nerves in your hand to simulate a keyboard -- probably best imbedded in a glove. Potentially, this could actually "feel" like a keyboard. For work in a germ or particle free environment, the device would have to be smooth enough to be worn under latex surgical gloves.

  98. curiouser and curiouser..... by mgandhi2 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the government grant for MIT is linked at all to these recent breakthroughs in wearable PCs.... It seems like a lot of these things were a ways off a year ago. Perhaps the military isn't just providing funding for MIT, but also funding many other research groups on the verge of advances in wearable PC technology. Why put all your eggs in one basket? If they have $50 million to give to MIT for a nanotech suit, why wouldn't they have more millions to spend on "subcontractors" developing HUDs, virtual keyboards, communication networks and devices, etc, etc? I have a theory: within the next few years, the public will be flooded with news of breakthroughs in nanotechnology, microcomputers, augmented reality, hands free or heads up display and input devices, real space vertex input, and other technologies related to mobile computing. Now all we need is a hostile alien race! Hold on tight, ladies and gentlemen. It looks like we'll get to LIVE the sci-fi that we grew up on.

    --
    I have no desire to reach nirvana.
  99. Boycott Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should not buy things from Israel until
    they give the Palestinians their rights and stop
    oppressing them.

    I have to admit that it is a clever idea.
    Regular keyboards get all jammed up when you get
    Palestinian blood on them. This solves that
    problem.

  100. Portable, customizable, shareable interfaces by Syphilis · · Score: 1

    Neat solution - easy to imagine moveable, virtual interfaces making their way into everything, from remote controls to screens to telephones... imagine an entire office fitting into a tiny cube you can carry around.

    Eventually the interfaces wouldn't have to be projected externally, but rather into the mind's eye. Why should a lightswitch have a fixed position, when each member of a household could have place them at the location and height they find most convenient?

  101. Re:Company's Website Addy... At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they are not hiding behing a .com
    They are using the hated .il
    We need to boycott these racist thugs until
    they give the Palistinians their human rights.

  102. Tactile feedback by ucblockhead · · Score: 3

    What would really be interesting would be if someone would combine this with a data glove that uses piezoelectric crystals to provide tactile feedback.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  103. But I need the nipples! by Phrogz · · Score: 2

    I actually look at the screen when I type and use the mouse. The little keyboard nipples are very important for me to ensure my hands are back in the correct position before typing away.

    I also am rather certain that my fingers often find the right keys by touching various key boundaries to know where they are occasionally, but I can't be sure. (So odd to not know what one's muscle memory is doing!)

    I think foldable keyboards like the one for the Palm are the solution, not projecting...but interesting research, keep it up!

  104. Integrate that Laser HUD Retina-Display! by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

    Not much more needs to be said. PDA with this keyboard and the laser HUD retina display from this article in one unit -- THAT is the laptop for me. :P

  105. Does no one touch-type any more? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    How can you possibly touch-type with this thing?

    Ok, yes they are showing it off as a portable keyboard for, well portables. As such it's pretty cool. But there are a lot of people talking her about using it on their regular computers and that's pretty rediculous...

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  106. Progress by Mannerism · · Score: 1

    Very impressive. After 25 years, we've developed a keyboard with less tactile feedback than that of the Atari 400.

  107. OK, who's getting the money? by bluntmanspam · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is this the new advertising-based model we have been hearing so much about? The same story every two days from Slashdot?

    If it is, can I pay a couple of bucks to stop it?

  108. Not a regular keyboard replacement by minkeyboodle · · Score: 1

    For those who's arguments against this are "no tactile feedback" or "I can't type as fast with it" or the like, please consider that this thing probably isn't meant to replace your current keyboard for your computer.

    This thing is targeted at use with mobile devices. It eliminates the need to carry a keyboard around with your Palm or your mobile phone. It will become integrated into your mobile computing device or phone or whatever (i.e., no extra device to carry around for keyboard input). It is meant as a convinience for mobile devices specifically.

    It is not supposed to enhance your typing experience; it is meant to enhance the portability of other devices (even if that means you give up some speed or responsiveness).

  109. drools over thoughts of how cool this could be...

  110. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool technology but this is more cool:
    http://www.senseboard.com/

    I'm gonna buy one!

    *Too lazy to register*
    //Spacecow

  111. Exercise and type at the same time... by human+bean · · Score: 2
    1. modify focal length of lens.

    2. project on floor.

    3. Portable "Dance, Dance, Revolution"...

    4. Somebody hose me down before I come up with more ideas....

    --

    *whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"

  112. Not from Siemens!!! by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

    Actually, according to the article, it is by a company called Developer VKB, not Siemens.

  113. Keyboard-Indpendent Touch-Typing by 01149 · · Score: 1

    There is another new device and method that uses finger and thumb mounted contacts for data input similar to earlier glove-based devices such as the KeyGlove by Paul Mc Carty, the Chording Glove by Rosenberg or Vaughan Pratt's glove which uses Thumb-Coding. However, in contrast to these and other existing hand-mounted CHORDING DEVICES for which the user has to learn a new coding language, the device proposed by me takes advantages of the users touch-typings skills which virtually eliminates any learning period for those familiar with touch-typing. The new device is also superior to other devices [detials see below *)] such as Senseboards Virtual Keyboard, the Lightglove or the system shown in the picture of the article to which this message responds. (A patent application for my device has already been submitted).

    For more information please contact me directly at
    cmehring@eng.uci.edu, www.eng.uci.edu/~cmehring
    or visit www.tecideas.com for a short (I mean really short) article.

    You also might be able to read more about my invention in upcoming issues of wireless magazine and MIT's Technology Review magazine.

    *):

    There are several points to make with regard to the superiority of my invention with respect to the devices you mentioned, i.e. the Lightglove
    and the Virtual Keyboard by Senseboard.

    1) Production costs;

    The technology involved in the virtual keyboard and the lightlove, and the
    associated production costs and costs for parts are significantly larger
    than the production costs for the device I proposed.

    For example, the sensors used in the virtual keyboard measuring the
    flexure of the tendons have to be very sensitive in order to
    distinguish between different finger postitions. After all, finger
    movement within the virtual keyboard is not detected with sensors on
    the fingertips but by sensors fixed to the base of the fingers (using
    fingerless mittens).

    The lightlove is based on the generation of a "light-matrix" below the
    users hands. Penetration and location of penetration of this matrix by the
    users fingertips is detected and electronically mapped to an overlay
    assigning each position a character according to the layout of a
    traditional keyboard. This operation of the device involves
    simulataneous scanning of the matrix with various light emitting
    diodes or lasers, evaluation of the scattered electromagentic waveforms by
    various lightsensitive detectors, signal filtering in a bandpass filter in
    order to reject non-correlated ambient signals (see Pat.# 6,097,374
    at the uspto.gov homepage for more details). In fact the inventor
    of the lightglove R.B. Howard points out in his patent that
    in certain applications it might be desirable or necessary to use
    an input device other than an optical reflectance matrix.

    The device proposed by me is based on exactly the same principles as a
    standard keyboard for data input, i.e. using the closure of electrical
    circuits in order to generate a signal which then is interpreted by an
    off-the-shelf keyboard controller as alphanumeric character
    input. Accordingly, my device will not be more expensive than a regular
    keyboard.

    2) Device calibration / Decision electronics

    Due to the fact that everybody's finger movement is slightly different,
    the virtual keyboard will have to contain some electronics in order to
    allow device or sensor calibration for the individual user. The same
    holds true for the lightlove where detector calibration is needed in order to accomodate
    various ambient lighting conditions. In fact, as ambient lighting
    conditions might change continually (for example in a subway) continuous
    calibration of the device will be needed.

    The device and method proposed by me does not need any calibration. In
    fact, the use of the users fingers and thumbs (which have certain
    proportions for almost everybody) as placement locations for the electric
    contacts make the device usable for anybody with large or small hands long or short
    fingers. Assuming of course that the employed design (different from the
    glove design used for the proto-type) allows free placement of the
    mentioned contacts.

    Both lightlove and virtual keyboard are based on continuous detection
    sensors (i.e. measuring a certain amount of tendon flexure or a
    certain strength of electromagnetic energy at the light-detector). The
    device I propose uses a discrete approach: a signal is generated if the
    electic circuit is closed (by contacting one finger with one of the
    contacts on the thumb of the same hand), if the circuit is not closed
    there is no signal generated (totally analogous to the traditional
    keyboard). The use of a "continuous signal detector" implies more attached
    "decision" electronics (and consequently production costs) as
    well as a higher probability for erroneous data input.

    3) Comfort of use / erroneous data input

    Imagine you are using the virtual keyboard or the lightglove at Starbucks
    and you stop typing for a moment to scratch your nose or to zip some
    coffee. In order to omit character input you would have to swith the unit
    off every time before doing just that. Now imagine you have allergies or
    you are a big coffee drinker like me, or you want to just move your
    fingers around for a moment because they got tired from all the typing....

    In other words, while using the virtual keyboard or the lightglove you are
    very much restricted in the movement of your hands and fingers. This is
    not the case with the device I proposed: With it you can easily pick up
    anything without switching the unit off. (Assuming it is made of a
    conducting material of course.)
    With the virtual keyboard and the lightglove there is a well defined
    rest- or reference position or reference plane, with repsect to which all
    your finger movement is evaluated. In the case of the lightglove for
    example, the hand and the fingers have to be strechted out such that they
    do not penetate the lightmatrix below the hand. This might become very
    uncomfortable with time.

    The device I propose does not have such a well-defined reference position.
    In fact your fingers and thumbs can be in any position as long as the
    fingertips (or possibly sides of the fingers, where contacts for special
    character input are located) do not touch the thumbs of the same hand.

    Furthermore, the lack of tactile feedback when using the lightglove and
    the virtual keyboard (in the mode of "air-typing", i.e. without a solid
    surface to type on) will possibly slow down the rate of data input.

    4) True or Ultra Portability (Virtual Keyboard only)

    The main application of Senseboards Virtual Keyboard is its use in
    combination with a flat solid surface as reference surface. With this
    the device is not truly portable any more; you might as well use one
    of those flexible keyboards you can roll up.
    Just imagine you would like to type a letter sitting on a park bench
    or standing at a subway stop (i.e. situations where there is just no
    flat solid reference surface to type on). In those cases, I suppose,
    Senseboard proposes "air-typing" where you hold you finges in a
    resting position similar to a position the hands would be in when resting
    on a solid surface. However, it is questionable if a user will be able to
    preserve this position in the course of his typing action.

    5) OTHER ULTRA-PORTABLE GLOVE BASED SYSTMS

    As pointed out earlier, other ultra-portable glove-based or hand-mounted systems
    for data-input such as the KeyGlove (originally designed by R. Paul Mc Carty from Rochester
    University) , the Chording Glove (by Robert Rosenberg from University
    College of London) or Vaughan R. Pratt's (Stanford University) glove
    using the Thumb-code procedure are all CHORDING devices which do not
    take advantage of the users existing touch-typing skills.

    Hope you enjoyed the reading

  114. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can only write one letter *a second* with handwriting? Those are some awefully slow hands you got there.

    Perhaps you don't realize:
    a) How few 60 characters are (less than an average sentance)
    or b) How long a minute is

    Of course, your (even fairly small) post contains 600 characters (since, of course, the space-bar on a computer is a character)--so I guess it took you a little over 2 minutes of pure typing?

    In that case, I don't think it really matters WHAT you're using for the Palm device or whatnot...it's gonna take you a decade to write anything substation anyway. (Or, as I assume, your numbers are just a bit off.)

    1. Re:Huh? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Actually the numbers aren't off base. I suck at writing by hand/pen. I've actually timed myself, and I clock in at aprox 60 chars per minute, when using handwriting. I don't own any palm-like devices, but that doesn't make it impossible to test.

      Find a simple page of text, and type it into a texteditor. I clock in at aprox 250 chars per minute when typing. Then write the same text by hand. I clock in at aprox 60 chars per minute by hand, and yes, that's including spaces.

      I never said, I was any good at handwriting. I think one of the things really dragging my speed down, is that I make alot more mistakes with handwriting, than with keytyping.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  115. Scifi brought to life? by petark · · Score: 1

    I remember reading the Harry Harrison books Homeworld, Wheelworld and Starworld where there was a similar device. In one of the books (I can't remember which) the main character, Jan, uses a computer that a fellow prisoner had.

    This computer was built into a broach on a necklace. Once activated it would create a hologram of a compouter that could be used just like the real thing.

    I wonder when the virtual keyboard will become the virtual computer? I would like that quite a lot. Imagine, you just need a small table to place your pen-computer onto and it will project a nice image to interact with. When are researchers going to catch up with strong enough power supplies?

  116. Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear CmdrTaco (Score:3, Funny)
    by Signa1 11 on on Wednesday March 20, @08:14AM (#3193451)
    (User #567568 Info)



    Not the Signa1 ll on ?
    Eh?

  117. yeah! by insane8 · · Score: 1

    damn palestinians keep gunking up my keyboard too!.. I hope they stop blowing themselves up soon.. hey.. anyone have a video of a palestinian blowing himself up ?? or how about some suiside bloopers ?? where he goes to flick the switch and instead of blowing up, a little flag with the words "boom" comes out...

  118. I'm going to need one... by gdyas · · Score: 2

    ...'cause I'm never going to get all the drool out of my current keyboard.

    It's torture to sit across the pond & watch those damn Euros get to play with all those toys while I slave away. May they all choke on Nutella sandwiches.

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

  119. The line between sane and not-so-sane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The line between sane and not-so-sane just got a bit blurrier. Soon, the guy next to you on the bus will be talking to himself (hands-free cell doohickey) and typing on a keyboard that isn't there.

  120. People could get more hurt? by rmadhuram · · Score: 1

    Most often users frustration is vented on the keyboard (http://lap.umd.edu/Computer_Rage/). Maybe we would see people getting hurt banging on desks or dashboard..

  121. Problems by Xife · · Score: 1

    As many have pointed out -
    No tactile feedback. They underestimate tactile feedback. Can you look at your hands and make sure the key you pressed shows up on the screen while typing more than 10 wpm? What about the backspace frenzy when it messes up? I hope resting my palms or an uneven or unlevel surface won't mess it up.

    I don't know about you but I actually notice the little bumps on the f an j keys, they let me find my position on the keyboard without looking. Mac (or was it NeXT) sometimes mess me up with their dots on d and k.

    Second, what if I use the left hand alt to do Alt+D or Alt+F? Will it be able to 'see' the obscured alt key?

    I bet it will be great for Quake (NOT)! How often do you look down at your hands while playing? Are they going to simulate a touchpad with it too?

    Although a bit of a stretch - I think it would be much easier to teach people to type chording style with switches attached to their fingers.

    Type anywhere, tactile feedback, much more friendly to modal (ie vi) than to windows (alt/cntrl + key) bindings.

    --
    ---- Smokin' another sig.
  122. Virtual Keyboard VIDEO by ricardo2c · · Score: 1

    Just in case you like watching videos better than looking at pictures...

    --
    --Drake 2c
  123. Minicomputer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The virtual interface ... could be a revolution for the data entry of any mini computer.

    --Yahoo blurb

    A computer ... typically about the size and shape of a wardrobe, mounted in a single tall rack.

    --FOLDOC entry for 'minicomputer'

    I think the choice of the word "minicomputer" was slightly inaccurate.

  124. I see a potential problem with this: by MetalMorph · · Score: 1

    What if the surface it's projected on is red?

    ...

    ;)

    --
    My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
  125. Better Article: by bobdole34 · · Score: 0

    http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_548253.html?m enu=news.technology

    --
    "Failure of Windows operating systems is extremely rare. If it happens, it is usually due to operating system file c