Slashdot Mirror


PC Prices to Rise?

guinan writes "The Economist is running a story about how now that PC makers think the worst is over, it's high time to raise prices. In particular, the focus is on the steady price of flat-panels and a possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory. Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes, but if you want to buy a computer from a major brand better go for one soon while you can still get all the perks."

271 comments

  1. um, ya right. by AA0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory."

    What is this person smoking? Memory price is almost triple what it used to be.

    1. Re:um, ya right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not where I live. Here it is just a little more than double what it used to be.

    2. Re:um, ya right. by AA0 · · Score: 1

      DDR is about double, but if you take a look at PC133, it is easily triple here. Canada does have weird memory prices, DDR has always been higher than the US, but SD lower. Right now, the price isn't as high as it used to be, and it is coming down again, either the article is just wrong, or out of date by its published time.

      At one point, SD RAM here was less than $40, right now crucial has it for well over $130. Weird enough, DDR is cheap than SD, this is because of the move from PC2100 to PC2700 right now.

    3. Re:um, ya right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my store 128mb of GBmicro 133 is $59 and 128mb of GBmicro DDR is $69. Thats only $10 more then 3months ago.

  2. Decline in price of memory?! by oyenstikker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Memory prices have doubled in six months. What decline?

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    1. Re:Decline in price of memory?! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Memory prices have doubled in six months. What decline?

      The decline that ended 6 months ago?

      It was a sweet decline while it lasted. 256MB RAM cost me far less than 128MB had a few months earlier.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Decline in price of memory?! by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      I think memory is still declining, especialy DDR. In January, I was building a new computer. I ordered 2 256 sticks of PC 2100 DDR off of Pricewatch. They cost $105 dollars each. Now DDR costs $39 for a 256 stick. In a few months, DDR went from $105 to $39!!

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    3. Re:Decline in price of memory?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All negative moderations will be metamoderated as unfair.

      Somehow I doubt that threatening moderators is really the way forwards :-)

  3. Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by samdu · · Score: 1, Informative
    ...about the price of flat panels. CRTs are fine for now. I've yet to see a flat panel display that can equal or rival a CRT. Not to say that it won't happen, it just ain't here yet.

    -Sam

    1. Re:Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by Traser · · Score: 1

      It depends on the purpose of the flatpanel in question - if I were a hardcore quake III player, then an LCD would be unacceptable. However, as I mostly use my computer for doing math, and the games I do play are old, the savings in desk space afforded by an LCD just might be worth it when I go to purchase my new system this summer.

      --
      Insanity is contagious. - Yossarian
    2. Re:Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      photoshop
      illustrator
      premier
      sonar
      reason
      nu endo
      maya
      lightwave
      dual(or more) instances of audiograbber
      dual(or more) instances of nero

      list goes on and on. if i have to use any of those programs...1280x1024 is my choice on a 21" monitor. If I could get a bigger monitor either normal aspect ration or widescreen...then 1600x1200 becomes a real advantage.

    3. Re:Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by rjeong · · Score: 1

      It depends on the purpose of the flatpanel in question - if I were a hardcore quake III player, then an LCD would be unacceptable. However, as I mostly use my computer for doing math, and the games I do play are old, the savings in desk space afforded by an LCD just might be worth it when I go to purchase my new system this summer.

      The LCD Flatpanel aren't for nerds, they are for one of the millions of home users whom, as was said earlier, don't play intense games with demanding resolutions. "Normal" consumers love the idea that you could put Flatpanels on a wall or a take up a 1/3 of the space of a normal monitor.

    4. Re:Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I've yet to see a flat panel display that can equal or rival a CRT

      How's this informative?

      It's an *opinion*

    5. Re:Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's flamebait. And possibly redundant, as a CRT vs LCD article was run here just a day or two ago.

    6. Re:Couldn't give a rat's patooey... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      It's good enough for me. The picture is much crisper than any CRT I've ever seen and there's no flicker, ever. Which is great for my eyes, now that they're no longer young.

      I could care less how Quake looks. Deus Ex looks just as good as it did on my old 17-inch monitor, and Thief looks better. But then I'm not particularly anal about these things.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  4. Major brands: by joshjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    if you want to buy a computer from a major brand better go for one soon while you can still get all the perks

    Perks?

    1. Re:Major brands: by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I remember some dsl tech being sent out to my house told me to upgrade my computer to a "name brand" computer because they/me/us were having line tap issues in the neighborhood. One perk is recognition as you having spent money on the computer and it being worth something.

    2. Re:Major brands: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That dsl tech needs to pull his head out of Michael Dell's ass. The name brands aren't any better.

    3. Re:Major brands: by simetra · · Score: 2, Funny

      30 Years of MSN at $21.00/month in exchange for a $100 discount! Yeah Baby!

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    4. Re:Major brands: by xonker · · Score: 1

      Wow...talk about herd mentality.

      Sorry, I refuse to pony up extra for a machine that comes with a Windows tax and inferior components. I'll put together my own systems with the best components I can find and exactly the peripherals and such that I want. If sheep who don't know from computers think that a computer that doesn't have "Dell" or "Compaq" on the case is inferior, that's their problem.

    5. Re:Major brands: by perky · · Score: 2

      Perks?
      single point of contact warranty and support.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    6. Re:Major brands: by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      The guy who built my PC fixed a problem over the phone (picked up on 3rd ring) without even asking who I was. There are many advantages to a one-man shop ;-)

    7. Re:Major brands: by mlong · · Score: 1
      single point of contact warranty and support.

      Um if you are buying a PC for their support you're in for a big surprise. Just read any PC magazine to see how well Dell, Gateway, etc. supports their stuff. You're better off going with a local company.

      --
      //m
    8. Re:Major brands: by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      The Window tax may well be more than offset by the discount of an economy of scale.

    9. Re:Major brands: by Danse · · Score: 1

      Sure, until you order a customized system from a name-brand dealer. They charge double the going rate for a memory upgrade!! And that's just the start. If you want a generic system with mediocre components, then great, buy a Dell. If you want specific, high-quality components, then you're going to double the price of the system if you buy from Dell or one of the other biggies.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    10. Re:Major brands: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support? Ha! NOt only does Dell/etc support suck, but, really, when was the last time you had to call PC vendor support? Ever?

    11. Re:Major brands: by DeanOh · · Score: 1

      Single point of contact support?? Clearly you've never been caught in the "it's the software/hardware/your peripherals" limbo blame exercise.

      My advice to anybody who asks me (and is not inclined to build their own): have a machine built locally by the guy whose shop you've noticed as you've driven by the strip mall for the last few years. He (or she) will probably talk you smartly about what you plan use it for, get creative about component trade offs to get you in your budget range. Since he just might be a neighbor and interested in the positive effects of good word of mouth, expect responsive (even if not 24/7) support. Two shops within 4 miles of my house can custom build a machine within 72 hours. No shipping charges, no UPS dropkicks (and one guy doesn't charge sales tax: everything is bundled as a "labor charge".

      For a personal use box, locally built machines are excellent options both for somebody good who knows what they need and for somebody who's still trying to figure it out.

  5. dell & compaq by asavage · · Score: 1
    if you want to buy a computer from a major brand better go for one soon while you can still get all the perks

    But who would want a mini tower with onboard video and sound and almost no room to upgrade?

    1. Re:dell & compaq by PhatPhreddy · · Score: 0

      But who would want a mini tower with onboard video and sound and almost no room to upgrade Ha! Why not go for an iMac, at least it would be pretty...

    2. Re:dell & compaq by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

      My Dell Dimension came with a Geforce2 card. I can rip it out as soon as I want to.

    3. Re:dell & compaq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still a sheep for buying name brand. You cluebies are all alike.

    4. Re:dell & compaq by theblacksun · · Score: 0
      I run a computer lab at a state university, and I can say that Dell's PC's are not as bad as you'd like to make out. Admittedly, they do have the onboard video and sound, but I always disable the video for a better card. It would be nice to build all of our computers from parts, but the price to the university in man hours would be too much, plus when something inevitibly breaks we wouldn't be able to just dump it onto Dell.

      For my personal use, I'd rather build my own PC and put exactly what I want into it. But if I up the scale by ten times, things are easier all around buying complete systems. So if I wanted to replace some old computers in the lab, I'd want to do it now when those 'perks' come at a decent price.

      --
      Ignorance kills, complacency kills, hatred kills, but usually not the ones guilty of them.
    5. Re:dell & compaq by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Enjoy it whaile it lasts, the 845 Chipset loved by OEMs because they can lower systems costs by using cheaper DRAM doesn't have on-board video, once the 845G & GL are introduced with onboard video, the separate and generally pretty nice video cards that were offered will be no more.
      On a side note last month Dell had a deal which was less than the component prices with out shipping on either. I think the biggest reasons for self assembly are Linux, BSD, or pirating windows and overclocking or choosing the individual components like better mobos etc.
      Also remember that the white box market keeps the big guys honest. I would guess that if components were not freely available prices for PCs would be much closer to those of sgi's or sun's unix boxes.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    6. Re:dell & compaq by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I love it when a moderator mods down a perfeclty logical post and doesn't even give a reason for the modding. Guess there isn't a choice for "YOU USE DELL AND DISAGREE WITH ME I FUCK YOUR KARMA NOW"

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    7. Re:dell & compaq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy posts at 0, he wasn't modded down. The poor bastard's first post on /. was modded down as redundant, so now he gets to enjoy the negative karma as and all the resulting benefits.

    8. Re:dell & compaq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people who would rather not spend a weekend researching, buying, and assembling a new computer from parts.

      Granted, I doubt there's anybody on Slashdot that is like that, but out there in the Real World most people are like that.

    9. Re:dell & compaq by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

      It was less expensive than I could have built it myself for. I'm not sure what a cluebie is, sounds like a word for queers to use.

  6. Prices Are Up by Dak+RIT · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apple announced it was increasing its prices on the iMac $100 each in March, and ended a promotion on its LCDs. Since then IBM, Dell, Sony, Compaq and Gateway (that I know of, probably others too) have announced they're rising prices 10% to 30%.

    Memory has already doubled to tripled in price, and LCDs are up 25%.

    The time for bargains was over a month ago, if you buy today or wait 2 weeks not much is going to change.

    1. Re:Prices Are Up by stripes · · Score: 2
      Apple announced it was increasing its prices on the iMac $100 each in March, and ended a promotion on its LCDs.

      Yeah, but then they started another LCD promo almost the same as the first (and since both LCD promos were "buy a G4 and LCD and we give you stuff" it could be a G4 promo...)

      The time for bargains was over a month ago, if you buy today or wait 2 weeks not much is going to change.

      Maybe...or maybe you will wait 2 weeks and find the prices have gone up more.

    2. Re:Prices Are Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to baber.com to get motherboards, interesting cases, etc. and build my own. Of course I am going to get caught trying to save money when I have to put memory in the thing, but at least I already have Windows 98, mandrake and redhat installation cd's to set it up the way I want. Ok, Ok, so this is just a dream. I don't have the money to go to baber.com, and for sure I don't have the money to buy a system at Compusa, etc. if the prices have gone up 30%. The bait and switch, rebate hassle and high sales taxes have also turned me off on going to the brick_and_mortar's. Also the lack of $$. Also, I am tired of logging in only to have slashdot forget that I logged in a few ago, and was recognized as "logged in", now not logged in. So, I'll just post as Anonymous Coward.

    3. Re:Prices Are Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm... take your Ritalin

  7. flat panels by boio · · Score: 1

    Most analysts are predicting that current price increases are reaching a plateau.... now is not necessarily the time to buy (unless you buy like today), as price increases are already happening througout the industry, as can be seen in this article.

    The flat panels price increase is due almost entirely to a shortage of one of the key ingredients used in manufacture, which is supposedly only temporary.

    1. Re:flat panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Two relevant quotes from that article:
      Supplies of flat panels are expected to increase in the third quarter as more factories come online. Chip suppliers to the flat-panel industry are also increasing supply. "The flat-panel industry is spending like crazy," said [Merrill Lynch analyst Joe] Osha
      Last year, some manufacturers were selling memory for below cost. But prices for memory components are beginning to stabilize. Dell Computer, which has been changing configurations on its PCs to blunt the impact of component costs, said Thursday that costs have been flattening. The company also indicated that because of changes in its own operations, the company will likely be in a position again to lower costs.
      That seems to contradict this Economist article a lot - especially with Dell saying there were in a tight spot, but think that they may soon be coming out. If anything this would make me think about waiting to buy a computer. (Then again, we always think about waiting to buy a computer.)
  8. Didn't we see that one coming? by sebi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I guess this is inevitable. Apples announcment to increase the price of the iMacs was met with a lot of criticism but now it looks like they were only the first.

    The economic climate is changing. Memory and Flat panel Displays are getting more expensive so it's only natural for the whole machine to cost more. I just hope that DIY machines will get more expensive as well. Otherwise the posters that compare apple prices to machines they build part by part will not only continue to think that their arguments are valid, but even $100 more valid.

  9. Re:Don't buy a brand computer by bendsley · · Score: 1

    Linux and any of the BSD's are not well established?

    --
    Alcohol & calculus don't mix. Never drink & derive.
  10. Price is a weird deal by clion999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many people actively want to spend more. One of my relatively clueless neighbors asked me to bless his decision to spend $2700 on a new Dell. It was top of the line. I knew he did a bit of word processing and spent the rest of the time at home playing flight simulator games. He's not an avid, fast-twitch gamer. I tried to talk him into a $700 system. He wouldn't budge. He wanted to spend that much. He wanted to make sure it was "upwardly compatible" and "expandable", even though he would just spend another $2700 in a few years. There are plenty of suckers who have too much money. It's fine by me if the computer companies take it. The only thing that worries me is that they'll increase the cost of low-end systems that I like. It's been a long time since I did anything but basic coding and editing.

    1. Re:Price is a weird deal by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that a lot of people grossly overpay, however you mentioned that he plays flight sims: These are among the most hardware intensive games available (i.e. A machine that can kick ass in Quake 3 might slog and churn playing Flight Sim 2002). Sure you can turn down the features, but he if he spends lots of time playing then he might be exactly the sort of person to appreciate having every slider near the max, with extensive ground traffic, clouds, weather, etc.

    2. Re:Price is a weird deal by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Uh, he could do 2-3 times as better with a custom built system. I mean he could do a dual proc AMD system with 1.5 gigs of memory an ATI 8500 or GF4 with a cockpit chair and a 19-20" monitor. What did he get? Probably a 2.0ghz-2.2ghz and 512 megs of memory with a geforce 2 and a 17" flat panel.

    3. Re:Price is a weird deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what does that say about Flight Sim 2002? We all knew Microsoft writes crappy software, but slogging and churning on an Athlon XP with a GeForce card today would be hard work for even the worse game programmers. What are they doing? Renderring a movie while you play and streaming it to the FBI in search of terrorist hijackers?

    4. Re:Price is a weird deal by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      but slogging and churning on an Athlon XP with a GeForce card today would be hard work for even the worse game programmer

      You know I truly think that people VASTLY over-estimate the power of today's PCs (as they have done for years now): It is EASY to make a current system beg for mercy, and the reality is that most current games make huge compromises to allow them to run reasonably on the current crop of PCs. Sure, maybe a texture-mapped tunnel looks great and runs at 200fps, but go to and outdoor scene and things can start to slog to a crawl. I love the game Operation Flashpoint, yet on my GF3 Ti200 it is noticably stuttering at times : Before you disparage the authors -> This is by far the most complex and impressive graphics I've ever seen in a game, yet still it leaves a massive, gigantic opening for improvements (which I'm sure they'll do as the hardware improves).

      Flight Sim 2002 has the ability to model unbelievably complex scenarios, including hundreds of other planes, buildings, ground traffic, weather patterns, ATC, etc. Don't underestimate what is possible in a flight sim. Falcon 4 is a tremendous game, and is a couple of years old, yet still it makes my system groan for mercy when I get near the FLOT : They tried to partly simulate reality without as many shortcuts and the hardware just wasn't there.

    5. Re:Price is a weird deal by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe anywhere I said "Dude, You're getting a Dell". Instead I expressed that presuming that his hardware needs are low is being presumptuous, especially when he runs the most demanding app out there (flight sims).

      Having said that, it's been since about 1992 & the era of mail order Computer Shopper that you could build your own computer for less than the big VARs -> Add up the component costs and that Dell will be largely the same. Simply discounting the convenience (and power savings and better image and cooler running and space savings) of a flat screen monitor isn't quite building a better system either.

    6. Re:Price is a weird deal by Fweeky · · Score: 2

      > Yeah, but what does that say about Flight Sim 2002?

      That flight sims are damn complex things to render when you have all the detail sliders set to Max. At least Q3 doesn't have a mindnumbing view depth, complex physics, dynamic weather systems across hundreds of square miles which can be viewed from any angle, and LOD stuff that needs to scale from 500km to 5'.

  11. Economy coming back? by th3walrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So because one or two companies show slight gains from last quarter, the entire tech economy is rebounding? Bah... I wonder when media sources would like to give some proof as to recovery, rather than jumping on the optimistic bandwagon in their articles.

    Even so, raising prices at the beginning of a rebound might serve to shove us back in the gutter again. People are tighter with money now, especially tech workers, who are the #1 customers for these technologies. I don't think they're willing to give up the money so easily now.

    1. Re:Economy coming back? by _Knots · · Score: 1

      Hey - given the sheep mentality of 90+% of the people participating in this economy, it could be a good thing if the news media become optimisitic without proof. IANA Economist, but if people start spending, it seems that that could trigger an upwards feedback loop (optimism --> spending --> profits --> optimism, repeat) to help get us out of this "recession."

      Though you're right - the companies have to be careful. Rasing the prices, no matter how much optimism, might cause people to second guess purchacing decisions (works in any industry, not just computers) and thus hold us in the recession.

      Ok, I'm going to stop looking into my crystal ball now. It's prolly defective anyway.

      -Knots

      --
      Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
  12. Who needs a brand computer? by Sir+Homer · · Score: 0

    The best computer is the one you build yourself.

  13. Most? by sg3000 · · Score: 1

    > Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own
    > boxes

    Probably a significant number build their own boxes, but I doubt one could say, "most"

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:Most? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I used to build my own machines, but over time I discovered the advantage of having a manufacturer thorougly test all of the components together to make sure they worked well together.
      I always wanted to believe that every component worked just as well with every motherboard, etc., etc., but they just don't. When the company who's selecting the components is also designing the motherboard they have a distinct advantage. Sure, this means that when I start upgrading individual components I don't have the same guarantee - but at least I did for my original system, and honestly once I start upgrading my video card or this or that, I'm really about ready for a whole new system anyways.

    2. Re:Most? by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Well, my experience building my own machines is limited (just built my first), but judging from my own and associates' experiences (including my 1 1/2 years in telephone tech support), I would disagree. I have owned 2 different boxed systems and when comparing them to others, even the same model numbers, it seems that most manufacturers put in whatever components they can get the cheapest at the time of building the machine, and I have certainly had my problems with the prebuilt machines. On the other hand, I picked all top-quality components for the system I built, if not bleeding edge (Athalon XP 1700+, Soyo Dragon Plus, Yamaha CD-RW, Sony DVD, Western Digital HD w/8MB Cache, eVGA GeForce 2 MX 400 64 MB, Teac FDD, Lian Li case, Enermax power supply, rounded IDE + floppy cables) and I haven't had one problem that wasn't a configuration issue. Once I got everything configured properly it's been smooth sailing...now, I'd expect that if I used cheaper shit, I would probably have more problems.

      In reality, if you've got an ATA66/AGP4X (for example) mobo and ATA66 drives and AGP4X vid card that are of good quality, you shouldn't have any problems.

      Chris

    3. Re:Most? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
      In reality, if you've got an ATA66/AGP4X (for example) mobo and ATA66 drives and AGP4X vid card that are of good quality, you shouldn't have any problems.

      Sorry, my experience is markedly different. Simple things like combining the wrong mainstream motherboard chipset with the wrong mainstream sound card can screw a whole system, as recent experience on several systems with the same combination has demonstrated. (It was a KT7A and SoundBlaster kit, BTW, and in case anyone else is in the same boat, it's worth looking in the alternative KT7A FAQ...)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:Most? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How retarded are you if you spell Athlon Athalon! SHEESH!

    5. Re:Most? by saintlupus · · Score: 2

      Simple things like combining the wrong mainstream motherboard chipset with the wrong mainstream sound card can screw a whole system

      Christ, I'm glad I only deal with Apple and Sun gear these days... I haven't had to deal with any of these cock-ups in years.

      --saint

    6. Re:Most? by colmore · · Score: 2

      yeah, after the first two systems i built, i was gung ho, and advised all my friends to do the same.

      then the one i built last summer...
      bad motherboard, returned for (payed shipping twice more)
      bad processor, no response from vendor, had to buy a new one
      bad harddrive, returned (paid shipping twice more
      bizarre conflict with soundcard + motherboard

      all in all it took nearly an extra month of troubleshooting and dealing with online vendors, and an extra $150, killing any price advantage i had.

      in the future, i'm going to a local shop, one that's been around for a while, and getting a custom built box. i may pay an extra $100 or so for it, but i'll know what goes in, and if i need tech support, i'll have a warranty, and only need to drive it over to the shop.

      building your own system is fun. i suggest everyone try it once. but there are risks, especially when dealing with the kind of companies that give you the best prices. (www.pricewatch.com)

      the tech support you get from the OEMs is aweful, and they use second rate components.

      local shops are the way to go. i like a place where 3 years warranty actually means "if at any time in the next 3 years, something breaks, drive it in, and we'll fix it as fast as possible."

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    7. Re:Most? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I always build my own machine. I know the quality of the components, I know how they work together, and I know that they've been properly installed. Furthermore if anything goes wrong putting it together the only person to blame is me.

      I haven't seen a great deal of attention paid to workmanship by large manufacturers like Dell, and there always seems to be a substandard part or two in the batch that has to be replaced - often a shitty low-end motherboard or some other knock-off with known problems.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    8. Re:Most? by Linuxb0y · · Score: 0

      So you're basically saying you're too lazy a person who can't be bothered doing some compatibility research before buying lastest PC parts.

      Oh, about design of motherboards you get, compatible probably because all the parts sc/video/eth are included on the motherboard.

      That's real Linux compatible. Guaranteed ;)

  14. nooooooo by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Funny

    doo you know what this will do to the "over priced Mac" argument!!!!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  15. Building your own by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always build my own, stopping by Pricewatch to find the best prices.

    But everywhere I look, places are building custom PCs now. BestBuy was even building pcs to order. They had many vendors, Alienware, hp, compaq, etc.... You could order a custom PC, or build your own with off the shelf items. CompUSA started to carry OEM products awhile back, funny to see those white boxed oem products on sale at a retail store.

    1. Re:Building your own by wesmills · · Score: 2
      CompUSA started to carry OEM products awhile back, funny to see those white boxed oem products on sale at a retail store.

      So you mean they're returning to what they used to do. I doubt many other people do, but I remember the day when CompUSA was actually "Soft Warehouse," and was on Belt Line and Josey in Carrollton, Texas. There was also the original store in Addison down near the Tollway, but anyway .. (You do know that CompUSA, before being bought out by Groupo Sancho (I believe) is/was based in Dallas, right? Corporate HQ is at Beltline and Dallas Pkwy)

      Soft Warehouse, and later CompUSA, used to be great for buying all kinds of OEM/whitebox parts, kind of like what Fry's is these days (but with generally better quality). Between CompUSA and MSC Computers (a local shop), I could find everything I needed for a custom-built machine.

    2. Re:Building your own by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1

      Do you think the processor prices at pricewatch are believable ? Meaning, do you think that they are "marked up" (lower speed processors fraudulently remarked)

  16. Usual rumour tactics by Baki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These are just usual rumours to get the people buy now, and not postpone. We've seen such manipulation over and over again (e.g. with memory prices, causing huge price fluctuations; there is always a group earning lots of money on price fluctuations).

    Over time PC prices shall come down inevitably, there is no fundamental reason why progress of technology (enabling more power for same price or equal power for lower price) should stop any time soon.

    Example: LCD prices are bound to fall sharply in the second half of the year. New production capacity comes available in big quantities in july/august (new generation plants, higher efficiency, less shortages etc). I guess some stakeholders want to push people into buying now (out of fear for price increases) to get rid of their old inventories.

    1. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. Cashing in on propaganda. Short term profits perhaps but at the cost of credibility. I still vividly remember all the hew and cry in the press about the shortage of tech workers. Will be a long time before I regain much faith in the press. No longer an information source but a crowbar made of lies.

    2. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      all the hew and cry in the press about the shortage of tech workers

      Some of that (esp. regarding not-so-highly-educated "high tech" workers) was certainly just lemming-see-lemming-write hype mongering... but it's different in that there wasn't really anyone selling their product (except perhaps some of techies wanting even more inflated salaries... but they have less influence on press than companies)

      And shortage for actually qualified and competent tech people is still true, and will be true in near future. Big headlines for tech slump hide the fact that even now it is often difficult to find good enough people, esp. programmers (and related, system architects etc). There are lots of people who claim they have the skills, but who shouldn't have been hired in the first place... and their crying is now obfuscating the scenery.

      I'm not saying it's easy to find a job, even if you are qualified right now, but it's often more of a problem of supply and demand meeting, not least because of floood of "fake" candidates, 20 year old dotcom CEOs, "programmers" who self-taught javascript in 2 days etc. etc..

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    3. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a product to sell. Was all about getting the extra h1b's in the country. They want us earning a steady 8 bucks an hour, just like the rest of the poor bastards in the country.

    4. Re:Usual rumour tactics by danielrose · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's easy to find a job, even if you are qualified right now, but it's often more of a problem of supply and demand meeting, not least because of floood of "fake" candidates, 20 year old dotcom CEOs, "programmers" who self-taught javascript in 2 days etc. etc..

      Are you saying my skills are lacking because I taught myself PHP on a 12 hour plane flight? Or because I taught myself the ins and outs of XML one afternoon at work? Or because I learnt Javascript from a pocket reference?
      That is exactly why there is a skill shortage, they don't employ people who have a clue but no commercial experience. I can show examples of personal work, but nobody pays any attention :)

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    5. Re:Usual rumour tactics by crankyinmv · · Score: 1

      And shortage for actually qualified and competent tech people is still true, and will be true in near future. Big headlines for tech slump hide the fact that even now it is often difficult to find good enough people, esp. programmers (and related, system architects etc). There are lots of people who claim they have the skills, but who shouldn't have been hired in the first place... and their crying is now obfuscating the scenery.
      I'm not saying it's easy to find a job, even if you are qualified right now, but it's often more of a problem of supply and demand meeting, not least because of floood of "fake" candidates, 20 year old dotcom CEOs, "programmers" who self-taught javascript in 2 days etc. etc..


      I know I'm going further off-topic here, but as an actual qualified developer still looking for work, I thought this required a reply.

      Yes, from what I've heard there are lots of bad resumes (ie: blatant lies instead of major exaggerations) floating around. On the other hand, a lot of places float bad job ads:
      1. Lots of "testing the waters" ads advertising for a fake position.
      2. Going through multiple headhunters which all end up posting for the same position on the same job boards.

      Even the suposedly legitimate postings have some major problems. Every one of them is overspecified, which in turn leads to resume perjury.

      1. Companies are scared-to-death that somebody will actually learn something on the job and leave for another place. The industry is really shooting itself in the foot here because that makes the search process more difficult for everyone and the cost of a new candidate goes up.
      2. Related technologies and general development skill never seem to enter into the specs.
      3. Most places don't like to see any wrinkled faces in software development.

      If the industry is unable to find qualified workers, it's the fault of the industry and no one else.

      --

      ---
      For your protection, a copy of this message is being sent via RFC 1149.
    6. Re:Usual rumour tactics by jafac · · Score: 2

      Apple is also playing this game.

      I have opted to upgrade my old system, rather than to buy a new one. I wanted to add the capabilities of putting my home movies on DVDs. I figured that all I had to do was get a DVD burner, bigger faster hard drive, CPU upgrade, some more memory, etc. I spent a fair chunk of change on the hardware, but less than if I had bought a new iMac, and MUCH less than if I had bought a G4 desktop.

      Turns out I was wrong - one crucial step in the DVD process is authoring. And on the Mac there are really two choices. DVD Studio Pro, which is $1k, or iDVD, which is free*. *Disclaimer: if you buy a new Mac with the built in DVD burner. In other words, if you want to burn DVD's you either have to take it up the ass for a new machine, or REALLY take it up the ass for the Pro software package. Granted, DVD Studio Pro is awesome, but after spending $1k on hardware, I'm not sure if I want to spend that much again on software to do something that another program will do for free (if you buy a new Mac).

      And before you call me a whiner, I'm not in the market for an iMac. I want a machine that's upgradable - and I want to preserve my investment in my legacy hardware (SCSI scanner, ext. HD array, ext. CD-R burner, ADB graphics tablet, etc. etc. etc.) - and I don't believe that the current Pro machines are worth what Apple is charging, especially at the high end with the DVD burner and iDVD software.

      The computer industry thrives on sales of new machines. And as sales decline, we'll see pressure like this increase to get people to upgrade. And we'll continue to see stubborn hold-outs like myself. I think it's worse in the Apple market, because Macs in general (not iMacs) are VERY upgradable. Nobody wants to just toss their legacy hardware. OS X, USB, all these new technologies are really putting the pressure on. I'm just glad I'm not one of those poor schmucks stuck with a 9600. It was an awesome platform in it's day, and can still be upgraded - I think you can put dual 500MHz G4's on it, but it's not supported by OS X.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Well, that's the standard stereotypical H1B image. Perhaps there are companies abusing it that way, I have no idea. All I know is there are enough H1B people earning 6-figure salaries to pay neat welfare for lots of unfortunate 8-bucks-or-less working poors, and that many of those H1B workers are actually cream of the crop from their home country.

      H1B program is bigger loss for originating countries than for USA...

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    8. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      I know, I shouldn't be too generalizing, and should have rephrased that. The fact that someone is able to learn new things fast and without too much external pressure is a plus, not a minus. I should have said something like "'programmers' who 'learnt' javascript by stealing scripts from web pages their friends showed them" or "people who think that even thought only programming language they know is VB, learnt in two-week mail correspondence class" to descibe applicants that were overvalued. And this, btw, doesn't mean I frown upon scripting languages... just that anyone who learns C without any previous programming experience, in a week, is likely to be something special. :-)

      I myself learnt Javascript in a week reading JavaScript bible. And after a month I wrote my first spreadsheet app in javascript (I kid you not)... and although I don't consider myself guru in JS, at least I can create my own stuff, not just cut'n paste existing scripts.

      What I am saying is that genuine skills (no matter how they are obtained) should be valued. Usually people who learn new things fast have strong foundation, wide set of skills that allow them to learn new things easily. I wouldn't be surprised if that was true in your case.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  17. Prove it by Lord+Puppet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes..."



    I highly doubt the accuracy of this statement.



    1. Re:Prove it by joshjs · · Score: 1
      "Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes..."
      I highly doubt the accuracy of this statement.
      A) Maybe you should explain why.
      B) I smell a poll!
    2. Re:Prove it by Lord+Puppet · · Score: 4, Funny

      B) I smell a poll!

      Then we'll find out for sure that CowboyNeal built most of our computers.

    3. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since about 1987, I have always built my own boxes, but recently I've wavered... and it's purely on account of the cost issue. Now my time is becoming more and more valuable (higher pay, family) and PC prices [have been] getting lower and lower. It's getting harder for me to justify (especially to my wife) the time it takes to roll my own when the difference between parts and off-the-shelf is only a 100 to 200 bucks (or perhaps even less).

      Used to be, I'd do it just for the love of it (and to save some dough). Now, it's usually just a pain in the ass. And I don't believe hardware prices are going to increase to point where I'll change my mind.

    4. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using a computer I built mayself out of plexiglass/acrylic. It took me a while, but it is pretty cool. I also pluged in all of the components that I picked out individually. It really isn't that hard, you just need to get the right pieces and know how they all go together

    5. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You would admit that you don't build all your own systems?

      Hey everyone! Look at the luser! Haha!

      At one time I suspect that most slashdot viewers were the type that built their own systems. Perhaps that is no longer the case. But the reason one builds their own computer system is primarily because no one else can be expected to build it to your spec, if you know anything about computers at all. There's so much crappy PC hardware out there I'm amazed more people aren't building their own. Then again I'm amazed more people aren't running Linux. I guess this would explain the decline of intelligent commentary in the last few years.

    6. Re:Prove it by mellonhead · · Score: 1


      It's getting harder for me to justify (especially to my wife) the time it takes to roll my own ...

      My wife lets me roll my own all the time...

    7. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your wife she can have the money you save and blow it on whatever she wants. She will do that anyway, so why not make it look like you're doing her a favor.

    8. Re:Prove it by Spoing · · Score: 2
      Agreed; only my first PC (a lugable) and a laptop weren't home built. The reason used to be price and control, but now it's only control.

      IDE chipsets, video cards, and built-in sound support problems in systems I maintain are enough for me to continue to insist on paying for good parts that aren't bleeding edge when I suggest a computer to anyone else. A friend who, dispite my advice, chose a packaged computer only because of it's price ended up throwing the same computer away reciently...after over a year of odd problems with it. Yet, he's still looking for 'a deal' or a name brand and can't be bothered to investigate what he's actually buying.

      In recient years, though, I've been bitten a few times on parts that should have worked without much fuss but instead required firmware upgrades and special handling such as putting cards in specific slots and BIOS tweaking. With a pre-packaged PC, much of that should not be an issue. In the future, I don't know if I'll start recommending brand-name packaged systems. It is entirely likely, though.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    9. Re:Prove it by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      I've been building my own computers for several years, not so much so that I can build one "to my own personal specs" but mainly because I can build one that has higher quality components for a lower cost (look inside the major brand-name computers -- what crap!).

      Unfortunately, the same does not apply to Operating Systems. Linux is good and getting better, but still inferior to Windows in many ways.

    10. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In recient years, though, I've been bitten a few times on parts that should have worked without much fuss but instead required firmware upgrades and special handling such as putting cards in specific slots and BIOS tweaking."

      You'd like to think so, but your average retail HP or Compaq tends to have terrible hardware compatiblity issues, and zero BIOS updates. There is salvation, but it's usually a more expensive corporate 'workstation' type system.

    11. Re:Prove it by stripes · · Score: 2
      Since about 1987, I have always built my own boxes, but recently I've wavered...

      Me too, in fact I bought my first pre-built Intel box (er, unless you count i860 boxes) recently. It was cheaper then I would built it myself. For the most part even decent componants.

      They skimped on the case, it is kind of cheasy. They skimped big time on the power supply, it is monster loud. My machines all have PC Power and Cooling supplies, and are all quiet. This new machine has a normal supply, and it reminded me why I buy my own quiet ones. Plus the keyboard and mouse really suck.

      I think next time I'll build my own since I can get all the parts I really want, not an ethernet that is decent, but one I like, not drives that are decent, but ones I like, not power supplies that suck, but ones that rule.

      For now I just bought a new power supply, keyboard, and mouse to replace the ones it came with.

    12. Re:Prove it by dstone · · Score: 2

      Used to be, I'd do it just for the love of it (and to save some dough). Now, it's usually just a pain in the ass.

      Congratulations. You're no longer a hacker. You're a consumer. Enjoy your appliances. ;-)

    13. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont spend a lot of money on *ANY* system anymore.

      I buy used dells for pennys to write code / browse web / whatever else I do.

      PIII 500 w/ 768MB memory for 300 bux? Why do I need to spend more or waste my time researching the latest and greatest cpu / chipset combos?

    14. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 2

      "You're no longer a hacker."

      Ouch, that hurt. Actually, my daily job involves system integration, software and (sometimes) hardware development, so I kinda get my fill of it at work. Getting married... well that changed things a lot. Way back when (while single), I spent a week of evenings hacking an 8 channel [radio] scanner from Radio Trash. Interfaced the PLL tuner IC to the parallel port on my PC and wrote a C [DOS] program to control the tuning. Wound up with a 400 channel scanner when under PC control. Me very busy now; all I can do is look back on that stuff as "the Good ol' Days"

    15. Re:Prove it by Internet+Stranger · · Score: 1

      The whole 3 hours it takes to shop for parts and throw them together and slap an OS on it?

      Which company are you the CEO of? You could skip one day of golf to do this you know.

      --
      ------------- I didn't know she was your sister I swear!
    16. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 2

      I'm the CEO of my household, and the chairman of the board and majority stockholder is my wife and she don't put up with no shit :~/

      Some people call it 'whipped, but it's really just married.

      Oh, and the VP of R&D is a 2 year old.

    17. Re:Prove it by Bake · · Score: 1

      I think that was one of the funnier comments I've read here on /., would it be OK if I used it as my signature?

    18. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 1

      Though I'm not sure which part of my comment you're refering to, be my guest.

    19. Re:Prove it by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. It's easier to go to Home Depot, Lowes, etc and buy a box. That way, you don't have to mess with cutting the cardboard prescisely, folding cleanly or getting the glue spread evenly without making your $HOUSE/$TABLE/$SELF a sticky mess. Plus, you are more likely to find reliable, heavy-duty boxes made by a box company that knows what it is doing.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    20. Re:Prove it by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Yeah, if I had a wife that wouldn't let me spend the time to build a computer (or pursue one of my many other hobbies), it'd be time for a new wife. Relationships are supposed to *enhance* your life, not make you a slave to your family, forcing you to abandon all that you enjoy in life.

    21. Re:Prove it by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      So if getting married forces you to give up everything that's fun in life, why bother? Maybe you picked the wrong spouse.

    22. Re:Prove it by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing. Last year was an exception.
      When the price of a Compaq Presario 7100US (AMD 1.3GHZ Athlon w 256MB DDR RAM, CDRW, DVD, GeoForce
      2 w/ 64MB RAM, 1394, USB 60GBHD) I figured.. gee I can't buid it that cheap so I bought it.
      Now I ran into one issue, no health monitoring chips in the beast, so I can't monitor the cpu core voltages or the heat of the box.
      Arrgh! if I built it myself I would be able to monitor with lm_sensors!

    23. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 1

      I chose to get married and it *has enhanced* my life. I was not providing a commentary on how marriage and family have ruined my life, it was a commentary on how changes in my life have changed the things that I enjoy most. Playing with my 2 year old *is* fun and much more important to me than re-hashing an experience that ceased to be a challenge years ago.

      I wasn't bitching about how I can't have fun anymore, I was saying that building a PC from parts at home is becoming "a pain in the ass" to me and not worth the trouble or money saved.

    24. Re:Prove it by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Wow. And even worse, you've become brainwashed about what you enjoy. That's really scary. I better hang onto bachelorhood as long as possible.

  18. Not according to the article by FaithAndReason · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The phrase "decline in the price of memory" comes from the submitter, not the article. According to the article (and the market), "the cost of some chips has been steadily increasing."

    Oddly enough, the article points out that steadily rising component prices may actually encourage some companies (e.g. Hynix) to get back into a market they had recently abandoned, despite shrinking margins. It also mentions that since Dell tends to pass changes in component prices quickly on to customers (for better or, in this case, worse), that it may actually be a competitive disadvantage WRT Compaq or HP, since those companies sell to retail at somewhat fixed prices.

    What a strange business - when technical innovation is the driving force in a market, the usual business laws don't seem to apply...

    1. Re:Not according to the article by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well I know from personal experience, that I have a hard time latly making any money building systems for people. With complete systems available from gateway for 600 its really hard to compete, I've got to be able to sell the same system for maybe 450 to be able to sell as I can't provide the same level of warrenty, putting together a complete system with monitor and a legal copy of windows at that price leaves me with no profit.

    2. Re:Not according to the article by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yep, as much as we all crow about building our own computer systems, at the present moment it's about the same price, or much lower if you include software bundles.

    3. Re:Not according to the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard builders saying the same thing 10 years ago -- With Compaq selling this system for $1999, how can I make a buck?!?

      I seriously don't get how system builders make it. Unless you are relying on support or network integration services and so on. But trying to fight the economies of scale of Dell and pals is just nuts.

    4. Re:Not according to the article by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Oh trust me they made money, but now with prices so low the real crux is the price of buying windows. You can find cheap hardware and even buy it in bulk, but trying to get windows for the price that a real OEM buys it for, impossible. Not including the fact that no small shop would be willing to sell their soul to the licensing deals MS office (ie no dual boot etc.)

    5. Re:Not according to the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only relevant software bundles are Windows and some form of Office (Word/Excell). Anyone who is buying thier second or third computer by now realizes all the other crap is just that, crap.

    6. Re:Not according to the article by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Well, those are the two packages I was talking about. Office especially is much cheaper if you get it bundled.

    7. Re:Not according to the article by mach-5 · · Score: 2

      You are preaching to the choir...it seems like the only money you can make in the PC business comes from fixing/upgrading PC's from Dell, Compaq, Gateway and the like. It would be great if all the little PC builders could somehow pull resources to compete against the big guys rather than run each other out of business.

      My business deals in such low quantity that it is difficult to even buy parts at less than retail...maybe that is part of the problem.

  19. Who cares? by blang · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Only the losers buy systems at DELL, Compaq, IBM, HP or whatever the brands are.

    You can still get a nice complete system, with an AMD Athlon XP 1700+, 256 MB of memory 40 GB disk, with sound and video, for less than $400, if you take your time looking for the best prices.

    Moore's law is still in full effect. A few years back, my ideal system would cost $2000, and my "Good enough" system would cost a little over $1000. Those prices seemed to stay constant over the years.

    Now, a "Good enough" system can be had for $200, and the "I'll never need another" system can be had for $700.

    I'm not worried.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    1. Re:Who cares? by rob-fu · · Score: 2, Funny

      As of about 5 months ago, a Sony VAIO RX550 went for $1000. P4 @ 1.5GHz, 256MB RAM, 60GB HD, DVD-ROM, CD-RW. This was the last brandname I ever bought. One box that I built died on me and I didn't have time (or the parts) to screw around building one. Mind you, this was _without_ a monitor.

      The specifications could be found here.

      Now they're selling about $750 refurbished. But what do i love most? That blue light in the front. It just looks cool.

    2. Re:Who cares? by SirKron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now, a "Good enough" system can be had for $200, and the "I'll never need another" system can be had for $700.

      Wow, I take it you do not plan on installing any MS products on your computer.

    3. Re:Who cares? by psavo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only the losers buy systems at DELL, Compaq, IBM, HP or whatever the brands are.

      And BIG companies. Like.. umh.. Those that matter. And consumers, those who really pay manuf.'s bill.
      Those who can build their own system are not a big market, they're more like marginal. Maybe a PR market, but really, really small.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software is free. The only thing worth paying for is hardware.

    5. Re:Who cares? by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention people who want support. Or rack mount servers.

      By the time you buy a rack chassis and the compatable parts, you might as well have purchased it from Dell.

      Or, if computers is your business, i.e. webhosting, you want something with a warranty, because if it breaks, as far as the clients are concerned, it's *your* problem to fix.

      Plus you have to look at: If you can get a system from dell for $500 with a celeron 1.1 Ghz, 256 MB ram, and a 20 gigabyte hard drive, you have to think, by the time you get all that from pricewatch, you're going to spend about $400 by the time you include shipping, they send the parts class R mail, and they're not quality pieces anyway, then you have to pay your employees $10/hr to put it together and test it? Not only do you lose time, but you lose money cause the time could have been spent doing something else.

      Even walmart sells computers with no windows. Honestly, its hard to save money building your own low end system anymore.

      --
      sig?
    6. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to hear about your loser "box," you stupid cluebie, but I'm boycotting the PDF format. Why don't you send me a link that's in a more open format, like HTML?

    7. Re:Who cares? by rob-fu · · Score: 1

      I'd love to hear about your loser "box," you stupid cluebie, but I'm boycotting the PDF format. Why don't you send me a link that's in a more open format, like HTML?

      That was the only one. Blame Sony, not me.

    8. Re:Who cares? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wallmart sells computers without an operating system, but with a winmodem?

      Hmmm. No wonder microsoft has antitrust problems

    9. Re:Who cares? by SirKron · · Score: 1

      Check out Aberdeen. These are almost like build-your-own rackmount servers and are a lot better than Compaq prices.

      Of course, these are only good if you are not using vendor supplied management solutions like Compaq's Insight Manager and Dell's OpenManage.

    10. Re:Who cares? by rob-fu · · Score: 1

      replying to my own post, now i know why they tell you to preview your post. forgot to close the i tag.

    11. Re:Who cares? by cmmwhodi · · Score: 1

      I didn't build my computer, but I did search around on the internet before I bought it. A week after I had received my computer and was using it, a friend went to Best Buy and paid exactly twice what I paid for the exact same computer. Geeks don't need to build their own anymore to save on money, they just need to look around for a good price.

    12. Re:Who cares? by psavo · · Score: 2

      I look more for what I Want.
      Let's consider my first system. An IBM PS/1 (486sx/25,4Mb/170Mb,14"). I paid my ass off for that almost $2000 (1994 something..).
      Next computer I had, I paid for it with my summerjob, it was about $1500, and it was almost top-of-the-line one (PPro180 when most you could get was PPro200).
      I paid much, much less than any corporation for that one. At that time I already got some connections and I bought it in parts.
      Most of that joy was to get it assembled ;)

      Don't know about you, but I ain't gonna get some dell-dimwit computer full of already b0rken parts (i740..). I'm gonna build mine from ground up. And I will not get any support for that.

      I know only one single reason (for consumer, not prosumer) to get a 'branded' computer: Support. 1-3 years will be almost enough for everyone.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    13. Re:Who cares? by danielrose · · Score: 1

      I believe the idea is that people will put their pirated windows on (rather than lunix), resulting in a cost saving for them :)

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    14. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?? I'm running XP on a 433 Mhz Celeron, 192mb RAM, and a 13GB hard drive. It's a myth that you need the latest and greatst to run Windows. And XP flys on my box!

    15. Re:Who cares? by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      however, if you are building a top of the line workstation system. Price watch is still the way to go. When I go for a balls to the wall system with a 2500 budget, the amount of quality I get at pricewatch far outweighs the amount I would get from dell. For my home system though, 499 at dell/ibm/hp/qpac is hard to turn down.

      -jj-

    16. Re:Who cares? by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      agreed definately.

      Ohhh, if only i had $4000 to spend on a computer. I'd rule the world. I'd start with an apple cinema display and the adapter kit for the PC, a dual athlon 1900+, 1 gig of ram, 100 gig western digital ata100 hard drives, special edition w/ 8 megs of cache, 2 of em, in raid 0, ohhhhhh.... I'm getting excited just thinking of it.

      --
      sig?
    17. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you see a winmodem in there....

    18. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be more effective to boycott morons like you.

    19. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, like they're gonna give people a £50 external modem on a budget system.

      Their strategy: "most people don't even know what a winmodem is, it's cheap, so let's use it"

    20. Re:Who cares? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just tell the AC to stuff himself? Any idiot can view PDF using free software like xpdf. If they don't want to launch X and browse in a GUI tough on them. The PDF format is hardly a secret. Hell, google.com indexes PDFs from all over the place and will even serve them as HTML documents. I bet the one you pointed to is in their cache.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    21. Re:Who cares? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      And just because I'm right for once: http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:d6Pbp7kRuzEC: www.sonystyle.com/vaio/popup/specs_rx550.pdf+&hl=e n (1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.2 0 -- now can I hit the damn submit button?!@#$%^&???)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    22. Re:Who cares? by Yarslayer · · Score: 1

      Ok... How do you hook up that mongo apple screen to a PC. I want links to the hardware or adapter that makes this possible.

    23. Re:Who cares? by jelle · · Score: 2

      If your budget is $/Eur 2500, and stability is very important, than use that budget to build two simpler and each slightly different systems. You'll love it, especially when for example you think the video drives of that top-of-the-line video card you bought are causing those hard-to-reproduce problems. You'll have a PC right next to it with a different brand videocard that doesn't hav the problem, and a 20-minute swap-diagnostic will show you if the problem is related to the video card.

      Plus then when that harddisk goes, or powersupply gives up right before that deadline, you'll have a working spare computer on which you made that backup of your files yesterday!

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    24. Re:Who cares? by jelle · · Score: 1

      "with a celeron 1.1 Ghz, 256 MB ram, and a 20 gigabyte hard drive"

      That is surplus by today's standards, and the parts in those boxes won't be quality components either. You can never beat surplus prices by whiteboxing. whiteboxing only works good in the high or top-level. Think XP1900+ and up, 512MB + 60GB minimum, etc.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  20. ram prices by kidlinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    "and a possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory."

    A possible end?
    The ram I'm using in my system, which I bought late August/early Septemer, has nearly tripled in price since then! At the time I bought it, I thought it was a reasonable price, but now it's just way too expensive.
    Keep in mind that memory prices have a great deal to do with supply and demand (or so they say.) Here's a price FAQ I found at crucial.com when wondering why my ram had become so expensvie.

    --
    -kidlinux.
    1. Re:ram prices by josquint · · Score: 2

      ditto!!!
      I deal with a CEO of a mem distributor.. it has tripled in the last 2 months.. we were gettin about 30 for a stick of 256pc100, now its well over 88

    2. Re:ram prices by America+Uber+Alles · · Score: 0

      Do you think this might have anything to do with the fact that SDR SDRAM is obsolete?

    3. Re:ram prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SDRAM?? I was talking about EDO.

    4. Re:ram prices by nslu · · Score: 0

      512mb of 768 in my machine were bought in october for $25 -- not used, new! (pc133/cas3)

  21. It's called "snob appeal" by FaithAndReason · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What your "clueless" neighbor wanted to you to "bless" was his decision to spend a huge amount of money on a computer merely to demonstrate his commitment to being on the cutting edge. In other words, he wanted you to let him know how L33T he is.

    Normally, I wouldn't be so condescending about a newbie, but the fact that he asked you about it, specifically telling you the price, indicates that he was just showing off. It would be kind of like him showing you his brand new Porsche, as he rubs his chin thoughtfully saying, "hmm, do you think I paid too much??"

    Meanwhile, I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper, especially since you don't have to pay the Microsoft Tax... ;#)

    1. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2

      It's like saying "My joystick is bigger than yours :P"

      Most non-computer literate folks rate PC's on PRICE or SIZE of the monitor) not the capabilities.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    2. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by ObeyTheWerejackal · · Score: 0
      It's like saying "My joystick is bigger than yours :P" Most non-computer literate folks rate PC's on PRICE or SIZE of the monitor) not the capabilities.

      More accurately, most idiots rate their penis size based on the size or price of their toys, thus expensive computers and trucks with tires bigger than a sedan. On the other hand, a few idiots (known as 'geeks', or 'nerds') make -real- jackasses of themselves by rating their penis size by the capabilities of their toys.

    3. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by binner1 · · Score: 1

      Keeping up with the Jones', anyone?

      -Ben

    4. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by JordanH · · Score: 1
      Actually, we should encourage clueless people to buy these top-of-the-line, bells-and-whistles systems.

      It helps support the manufacturers for the razor thin margins or breakeven they make on the low end!

    5. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by Malc · · Score: 1

      "I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper"

      I've been building my systems myself for a few years, but I think I disagree with your statement. Big suppliers like Gateway probably get bulk discounts on their components. It takes a lot of effort and time finding stuff that can match the price. But, what makes my systems more expensive is that I go for quality and specific components that suit my needs far better than a generic system.

    6. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by NicolaiBSD · · Score: 1

      I don't trust the comments of anyone who spells 733T L33T.

    7. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 31337 you dork.

      AC

    8. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      It's neither:
      1337 = leet, nothing else is true.

      --

      -Bucky
    9. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by KILNA · · Score: 1

      Its rare when I find an idea that adjusts the way I deal with newbies. I hadn't even thought of how the purchasing cluelessness of others effects myself when examined in big-picture context. If only more of the manufacturers who make the ala carte parts made the same whiz-bang top-of-the-line overpriced systems.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    10. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A really elite coder makes so much money per hour that he does better financially spending his time earning money (at $125+ per hour) and buying a system from Dell than building one.

      Of course, sometimes it is fun to build a system, but it is not economically feasible unless your time is worth about $10 / hour.

  22. What do you want to bet by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    The author owns stock in Memory and Processor companies? And probably at least one of the big brand name PC vendors...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:What do you want to bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the author was pretty much right

  23. they won't go up that much by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really don't think prices will go up too much and if they do go up it will probably be a temporary increase. Look how much competition there is amongst the PC makers. The reason why PC prices are so low is because of the ease of entry in to the marketplace coupled with rapidly changing technology and a reduced consumer demand for the latest and greatest PC. Ten years ago, you had to buy a new computer every two years in order to run the latest and greatest software. Not so anymore, a Pentium II will run just about everything the non-gamer needs to run, plus I've seen some thrifty gamers running P-II's with not too much of a problem, besides a little wait.

  24. YES! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    Now I can undersell my custom built superior systems even more. Name brand pcs are way overpriced as it is. Hopefully I'll move more computers now though.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  25. Re:Can you assemble a QUIET PC by erik+umenhofer · · Score: 1

    Check out this company.

    Zalman

    They make an assortment of products for quiet PC's. One is a heatsink that doesn't require a fan.

  26. hand built vs. off the shelf by TeaDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    t's only a personal thing, but as far as my own personal machines go, hand built is the only option. The advantages from having carefully chosen each and every component, exactly as required to do the job in hand are worth the few hours (good components/knowledge/luck permitting) it takes to build the thing. Even if I buy a system, the first thing I do is wipe the disks and start from scratch.

    Also, I'm probably not alone in being a serial upgrader, I replace something in one of my machines about once a month, funds permitting. So, I haven't actually built a whole new machine for myself in 4 years, though the only original parts left from that machine are the keyboard and case (currently home to my Linux dev box).

    However, I'd always go the way of prebuilt machines, preferably from one of a few big firms (I'm not going to plug ANYBODY) if I were putting a network together for people (something I do regularly), it's more for tech support and a good warranty than anything else.

    1. Re:hand built vs. off the shelf by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      This is me currently. I have some parts form my original, but have added a CD-RW, swapped MB's (cuz the original died), changed out a power supply, upgraded soundcards (to get rid of the revolting Aureal card I had and replace it with a Live), upgraded graphics cards (not to a GeForce 3 or a Geforce 4, but to a 2 MX400.....replacing a Permedia 2....it's all I need..I don't play twitch games), upgraded hard drives (40 GB replacing a 12 GB....12 GB was full...one day I wil add it back), changed cases and that's about it. Eventually, I will upgrade CD-RW and the DVD drives (maybe with a combo drive), upgrade the MB to a DDR board (not very likely yet), upgrade memory to 256 or 512 mb ram (very likely), upgrade monitors when my current one dies (to a 15 inch or larger LCD depending on funds). Replacing or upgrading parts is almost always the way to go, unless you need to add a PC. Then, if I were to choose, I would choose a place that built their own machines (Micro Center Power spec machines). When you choose a place that does BTO, not only do you get the parts you want (or at least the specs you want), you get a case that's upgradeable, and not proprietary. A case that can take new upgrades as the come.

      The only time I would buy a whole new machine is if I was adding a machine or getting a laptop. If I am just wanting to upgrade one piece, I can do that myself, and save the bucks. The same way that if something goes out in our car or if you want a new upgraded set of tires it's much cheaper to replace the part then buy a whole new car to replace it. Of course that's until the cars "case" rots (rusts). After that, you buy a new car.

      --

      Gorkman

  27. Re:Don't buy a brand computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buyed -> bought
    favourize -> favor

  28. You have to haggle by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2

    I look more to the used market for bargins in HD's , Memory , Monitors etc when I build a PC.

    I have a greater chance to HAGGLE :D
    Some great bargins there when you haggle them down.

    Even if it isn't used products, you can still haggle. No harm in trying. I always do.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  29. My Local news channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said that the price hike was for LCD monitors that help you "run programs and browse the web at faster speeds". I'd love to have that one explained to me.

  30. MOD PARENT UP by ObeyTheWerejackal · · Score: 0

    End the reign of dumbass submissions and editorial comments! Mod up all posts like that one!

  31. Why? by skybird0 · · Score: 1

    Can anyone tell me why memory prices have increased so much in the past few months? AFAIK memory is a multiple source commodity so the huge price jump seems to me to be not a consequence of supply and demand.

    1. Re:Why? by um...+Lucas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because there was a huge glut of it on the market. Memory manufacturers had increased capacity immensly during the boom times. Then the slump happened, and they were left with a huge amount of excess inventory and capacity. The only real way for them to alleviate that was to basically dump it into the market at whatever price people would pay... Since there was sooo much, the price was extremely low. Now that inventory and production are nearing demand levels, the price is rising back up again...

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One take I read is that it was ENRON's fault.

      Apparently they were betting on memory futures or something and ended up leaking information between the memory companies and the OEMs.

    3. Re:Why? by El_Nofx · · Score: 1

      There was an earthquake in Taiwan last year that took out a few plants. There was another last week, pretty large, > 6 if I remember right.
      Most of the memory in this country comes from there.

      Supply and Demand has alot to do with it too. It's kinda like a gas war. Someone gets cocky and lowers their price, they will get all the buisness if noone else does so they do to. Eventually it gets to the point where they are loosing money just to sell the stuff. You have to make money so eventually you go out of buisness or raise your prices.

      --
      It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall, however, that the price was low even before the economic trends turned south.

    5. Re:Why? by ahfoo · · Score: 2

      Reporting from Taiwan ahfoo sez:
      That last quake cracked a lot of ferrocement buildings in Taipei, and the cranes falling from the 55th floor of the building down the street sounded like all hell breaking loose, but the power didn't even blink and that's what caused the chip productiong problems during the big one a few years ago. There was no influence on production in the science parks where the fabs are according to the local news.
      AND Taiwan isn't the major source of RAM. Korea and Japan produce more RAM than Taiwan. Taiwan's got some too, and so does the US and probably some of those companies use the Taiwan fabs, but from what I've read most of it is from overseas.
      For Taiwan think motherboard chipsets, video chips, sound chips, DSPs and some early CPU action that should pick up over time but not so much RAM. Of course it's all going to mainland soon. So, as far as price increases go. . . uhm, you been to mainland China lately? I think prices are going down long term.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of the world are you in 128mb pc133 still 44.00 USD as of today on Crucial.When were you last paying 1/3 of that as you stated.When and where were you buying that for 15.00 USD?(I am assuming since you said prices have tripled that since I paid 44.00 for 128mb pc 133 that at one time you paid 15.00 USD.)

  32. Memory prices? by fabiolrs · · Score: 1

    ...possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory.

    Is this guy crazy? Here in Brazil last december I bought a 256mb memory for about 20 bucks... now I want another 256mb and its costing more than $100!!!!!!!!

    I remember 128 mb memory were as cheap as 10 bucks... 64mb memory were not even selling anymore... now I can even buy a 64mb with $20... :/

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
    1. Re:Memory prices? by martissimo · · Score: 1

      RAM is the definitely one of the wildestly fluctuating items for the PC in terms of price. I remember the last time it hit the real low point, i bought more sticks of ram than i could cram in my boxes. When the stuff gets cheap just buy the biggest sticks you can, and buy more than you need, it will come in handy later if you deal multiple computers on a regular basis.

      I have never found myself looking at old RAM i bought and havent used yet and thought to myself "when will i ever have a use for this?" (the key to it though is buying the big sticks, if you got small ones you may very well find less of a use for it), and when the market gets high and i pull some out, i *always* think to myself "i saved a bundle on this" ;)

    2. Re:Memory prices? by fabiolrs · · Score: 1

      hahhahah! :)) do you have any of those extra not used memories there to sell me? :))

      --
      Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
      http://www.morroida.com.br
  33. DON'T BUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most stupied recomendation I ever read.

    I would URGE against this recomendation based on:
    * No matter how much the PC manufacture raise the price, if other didn't follow, that PC manufacture will LOSE sell.
    Remember: Demand is the force.
    * Computer power has raise in amazing speed compare to aplication.
    If you use 500MHz PC and don't really need that 2 GHz processor now,
    you could get a 2.5 GHz processor with 2 GHz price 6 month from now,
    or a 3 GHz processor with 2 GHz price 1 year from now.

    Other thought:
    * PC manufacture release this rumor to clear their exxecive inventory.
    If you WAIT, the price will go up, then go down down down down.

  34. Ironic Comment by irn_bru · · Score: 2

    Typical...

    Yet again, where Apple lead, the others follow.

    1. Re:Ironic Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Typical...

      Yet again, where Apple lead, the others follow. "

      WHAT?!?! THE PC INDUSTRY IN GOING OUT OF BUSINESS?!??!
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOO...
      Oh wait,you're saying apple is "good"??!?!

      oh..haha..funny one...ya scared me for a second there...

      pffhhhttt

  35. "Crowbar Made of Lies" by jellybear · · Score: 1

    heh, "crowbar made of lies" indeed. You should write a heavy metal song about that.

    1. Re:"Crowbar Made of Lies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a good song. Something like..:

      Take your place before your television
      Prostate yourself, it is your god
      Exposed and naked with lidless eyes
      Forever succumbing to the crowbar of lies.

    2. Re:"Crowbar Made of Lies" by jellybear · · Score: 1

      *bangs head appreciatively*

  36. Re:Can you assemble a QUIET PC by AA0 · · Score: 1

    If you want a quiet pc, I can build one. There is one fan in the system, which is the psu fan. If a person knows what they are doing, you can get quiet HDs, chipsets, vid cards, cpus, and everything, the psu will be the loudest, but if you are willing to buy a laptop, I am more then sure you are willing to spend a little more on quiet pc parts. They aren't the fastest, but they can be very good.

    if you want more info, email me at aa@aselabs.com and I'll tell you what to pick. Need to know your needs first though.

  37. Mod it up! by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

    Yeah maybe its a little rude, but the dude is right...

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  38. Jeeze... by OverDrive33 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought that time travel guy said he'd have his device ready by fall! Now he's already been here and back telling about the rise in computer prices!!

  39. Compromise solution by Doomdark · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I am in a similar position, but for me there is a compromise that I like. Buy PC from a small independent vendor that can customize the system, ie use exactly the components you want. There are some limitations on components, but you can pretty much always choose from at least a couple of decent alternatives.

    What this means is that first of all I save time on not having to assemble the thing and test individual components, plus if something breaks, I can get it replaced more easily. But I still get to choose the exact configuration, and don't have to pay the Microsoft tax if I choose not to (if I choose to, however, I can still get OEM pricing for Windows).

    I may end up paying that 100 - 200 bucks for their work; but usually it's not even that much, since they still get volume discount for components. That is, if I bought components from them, the price would be about equal to what they charge for the whole system.

    --
    I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  40. The timing may advance open source by mikosullivan · · Score: 2

    If PC prices do rise, the timing may be fortuitous for open source. Although Linux still does not seem to be gaining ground on the corporate desktop, it is at least gaining mindshare: it's no longer a wild idea to suggest that a business should entirely migrate to Linux. If businesses do perceive that new hardware is more expensive, they may realize that Linux is like a low-cost hardware upgrade.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:The timing may advance open source by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      If anything, i'd think that i'd more stand to nulify the advantages of a free OS. The rise in hardware prices makes the % spent on software per PC lessen...

    2. Re:The timing may advance open source by The+LowTech+Swede · · Score: 1

      From a corporate standpoint, table top PC hardware cost is peanuts. Corporations are concerned with total cost of ownership. I would guess that you can rank their costs as: #1: Work loss due to user not understanding how to operate Software/Hardware #2: Tech support due to same #3: Software and development cost #4: Hardware / TLTS

  41. What prices will go up (not the economy) by funkman · · Score: 2

    Toxi waste - computers have a very short life and lots of toxic materials.

  42. Yeah right... by shepd · · Score: 1

    I'm soon going to go to this show (prices in $CDN). There's not a single price, other than memory, that's higher in that list.

    What, are PC prices going to double overnight?

    Not likely.

    BTW: Just a note of history, even though computer prices are continually coming down, they are, right now, higher than they've been in the past. In the past you could buy a C64 (when they were popular) for $400 and the disk drive for $200, making a system price $600 (IIRC). That can be tough to find with a PC nowadays (not impossible, just tough).

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Yeah right... by perky · · Score: 2

      In the past you could buy a C64 (when they were popular) for $400 and the disk drive for $200, making a system price $600 (IIRC). That can be tough to find with a PC nowadays (not impossible, just tough).

      hmmm. you haven't really grasped the concept of inflation have you. Now inflation at 2.5% (UK trend) compounded over 12 years runs to a 35% increase. In 1990 you could get yourself an Amiga 500 and a disc for about £500 sterling. factor inflation and you have £675 in today's money. I'm sure I could buy/build a pretty decent machine for that money.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    2. Re:Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now inflation at 2.5% (UK trend) compounded over 12 years runs to a 35% increase

      1.35 * $600 = $810

      Still not too easy to find a machine that's considered "decent" today for $810 CDN / $510 USD / 350 GBP (however, much more possible at that price).

      The Amiga was the second successor to the C64, and shows that over time prices for an average machine have done nothing but rise in amounts greater than inflation (which would be in serious contradiction of the various readings of Moore's Law's economic impact).

      >In 1990 you could get yourself an Amiga 500 and a disc for about £500 sterling

      $1,137 CDN for comparison.

      The fact that prices for a decent home computer went up 71% in under 10 years is just plain wrong, IMHO. But who am I to do anything about it. :-(

  43. Or Twice by zoomshorts · · Score: 0

    People ALLOW the prices to rise. If you do not run out and knee-jerk purchase computer stuff, Then you will have more leverage at the checkout counter a little later on in the season. RESIST the urge to upgrade, instead, learn how to maximumize what you have. Gamers, I realize you are hopelessly addicted and would hate to be jitter on the trailing edge of technology, but get a grip. IDIOTS buying new stuff fuels the spiral of higher prices. Manufacturers can resist the price changes too. They have the BUYING power to say NO! So do you! 3D graphics cards are NOT 3D. When will you technoweenies realize that? They will not be 3D until there is a large cubical chamber with multiple layers of LCD displays allowing for PSEUDO 3D effects. You are silly to believe otherwise. Without depth, there is NO 3D. Physics people, physics. Yes I run antiquated systems and they work just fine. They are last years stuff. BFD. You junkies need to control your habits. Businesses need nothing more than email, word processing and spreadsheets(if that) and rudimentary web access. EDI? Everything is Electronic Data Interchange. Buzzword challenged?

    1. Re:Or Twice by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      You ok there buddy? You done telling everyone what the need or don't need yet? Would you like some pills and water now?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  44. The worst is over...High time to raise prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Greetings:This is the Secretary of War at the State Department of the United States.


    We have a problem.


    The companies want something done about this sluggish world economic situation
    Profits have been running a little thin lately
    and we need to stimulate some growth. Now we know
    there's an alarmingly high number of young people roaming around in your country with nothing to do but stir up trouble for the police and damage private property. It doesn't look like they'll ever get a job. It's about time we did something constructive with these people. We've got thousands of 'em here too. They're crawling all over.


    The companies think it's time we all sit down, have a serious get-together- And start another war
    The President? He loves the idea! All those missiles streaming overhead to and fro... Napalm... People running down the road, skin on fire...


    The Soviets seem up for it: The Kremlin's been itching for the real thing for years. Hell, Afghanistan's no fun


    So whadya say? We don't even have to win this war. We just want to cut down on some of this excess population..


    Now look. Just start up a draft; draft as many of those people as you can. We'll call up every last youngster we can get our hands on, hand 'em some speed, give 'em an hour or two to learn how to use an automatic rifle and send 'em on their way
    Libya? El Salvador? How 'bout Northern Ireland?
    Or a "moderately repressive regime" in South America?We'll just cook up a good Soviet threat story in the Middle East-we need that oil
    We had Libya all ready to go and Colonel Khadafy's hit squad didn't even show up. I tell ya
    That man is unreliable. The Kremlin had their fingers on the button just like we did for that one.


    Now just think for a minute-We can make this war so big-so BIG, The more people we kill in this war, the more the economy will prosper. We can get rid of practically everybody on your dole queue if we plan this right. Take every loafer on welfare right off our computer rolls.


    Now don't worry about demonstrations-just pump up your drug supply.So many people have hooked themselves on heroin and amphetamines since we took over, it's just like Vietnam. We had everybody so busy with LSD they never got too strong. Kept the war functioning just fine
    It's easy. We've got our college kids so interested in beer they don't even care if we start manufacturing germ bombs again.
    Put a nuclear stockpile in their back yard,
    they wouldn't even know what it looked like
    So how 'bout it?

    Look-War is money.
    The arms manufacturers tell me unless
    we get our bomb factories up to full production
    the whole economy is going to collapse
    The Soviets are in the same boat.
    We all agree the time has come for the big one, so whadya say?!?
    That's excellent. We knew you'd agree
    The companies will be very pleased.

  45. Decline in the price of memory? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

    What planet are you living on? In the past 8 months the price of memory has tripled. In Sept. of last year I paid $28 for 256 meg DDR -- now it's selling for over $80.

  46. Too early... by software_non_olet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... the economy is still not really growing - only able to level even.

    Rising is never as fast as falling. And the mergers are not going to reduce the over-capacities. OK the memory was really too cheap, I think. But the rest? Flatscreens are not _that_ cheap.

    So all comes down to wishfull thinking for my opinion. We have ample time to compare prices and bargain. I don't need a Dell or HP - on the inside they are pretty much the same anyway.

  47. Monitors don't reflect computer prices by lost_it · · Score: 1

    Monitors have never followed the pricing drops that computers follow. I bought a monitor (KDS 19" 195T) two years ago, and then I bought a dual-head card with the intention of buying a second monitor. I love my current monitor, and want to get another like it. The trouble is, the price hasn't dropped. In fact, I bought my current monitor on sale, and I haven't seen the price come back to that level since then.

    My point? CRT monitors aren't subject to the same pricing trends as computers, because the technology isn't changing. LCD's have been dropping price because they're new and the manufacturying technology keeps improving. That doesn't mean anything for CPU, memory, hard drive, or adapter cards. And those are what keep bringing the system price down.

  48. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by SlashChick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, I used to think building my own box was the way to go. I'd get on Pricewatch and find the best motherboards, CPUs, etc. and build the whole thing. It used to be cheaper.

    Then my parents needed three new computers at once, and I decided to check out Dell Refurbished.

    For $580 shipped (each), I got 2 computers with a 1.1GHz Celeron processor and one with a 1.6GHz Pentium IV. All had at least 128MB RAM and one had 256MB (I bought extra memory from Crucial.com to bring them all up to 256MB.) All had at least a 20GB hard drive, which was all my parents needed for the office. All came preinstalled with Windows XP Home (fine for office work.) And one came with a Firewire card; one came with a kick-ass video card. All had either Ethernet or a 56K modem (in card format, even, not built on to the motherboard.) All of this also came with free one-year ON-SITE hardware tech support from Dell.

    I was a bit worried about the quality, since I've seen how Dell shafts its low-end users with shoddy parts. But the computers performed flawlessly upon arrival and have since, with no system crashes. Then, when it came time to swap out a CD-ROM for a CD-RW, I was truly impressed. Swapping out of a drive consisted of the following:

    1. Unplugging the computer.
    2. Pulling a thumb-tab at the top of the computer.
    3. Pulling a latch that released the CD-ROM drive.
    4. Unplugging the CD-ROM drive's cables.
    5. Pulling out the CD-ROM drive and putting the drive brackets on the new drive (which just snapped on.)
    6. Sliding in the new drive, plugging in cables, snapping case back together.
    7. Plug in.

    Done! No screws, no screwdriver, no nasty cheap ATX case with a hood you have to struggle with getting in the right place. Check out this picture to see what I'm talking about.

    There was no way I could have built these computers, bought Windows XP, and had any money left over to profit at $580 a computer. Plus, I would have had to put them in an ugly case that would have caused hassle for me later.

    I don't think it's economical any more to build your own computer. This is a GOOD thing -- it shows that computers have become a commodity. Do you build your own TV? Probably not. Microwave? Heck no. The quality to price ratio of pre-built computers is now such that even geeks are starting to buy pre-built computers. I, for one, am glad. Let Dell take over the hassle of being called when the computer has a problem. I'll spend more time doing things that I'd rather be doing. :)

  49. RAM hasn't been getting cheaper... by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

    RAM prices have been going up for quite a long time now. They bottomed out around last summer/fall and have been on the rise ever since. It would have been concievable for one to get 256MB of name brand PC2100 memory for $30 or less back then on Pricewatch. However, now you can't find anything decent for under $45, and the prices have continued to rise.

    --

    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
  50. Re:they won't go up: Period by bstadil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Prices will not go up. The main reason is Dell that is using this downturn to clobber their competitors. Notably Compaq.

    Dell as the lowcost producer only needs to keep the level and the rest will try and fail. Then go back the old pricing.

    This is being done in the Airline industry all the time. One of the major airlines sends a signal of higher prices waiting for reaction. If nobody follows they go down again, usually within days.

    Dell wil not follow as they have publicly stated they will use this trough to gain share.
    The PC price elasticity is such that pretty much price is the only thing that will spur market growth short-term. A hike will kill short term demand as no compelling reason for upgrading now rather than in 6 month time can be articulated.
    There is no new "must haves" in the newer boxes and it will be a while. Dell is the major culprit here as well since they have less than half of the R&D than other majors. Around 2.5% if I remember.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  51. Memory prices just DROPPED by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2

    See here. 256meg PC2100 DIMMs back down to $70 apiece. Kudos to amdmb.com for the heads-up.

  52. Re:The worst is over...High time to raise prices.. by theblacksun · · Score: 0

    Let's kill the poor we can't draft while we're at it.

    --
    Ignorance kills, complacency kills, hatred kills, but usually not the ones guilty of them.
  53. Price increases would force some redesign... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seal the case, provide onboard video & audio, LAN, and USB for expandability. I'm happy to give up
    a CDROM and hard disk (of course I run FreeBSD which saves me a bundle in cash flows to the devil in Redmond). I'd like to give up the damn noisy fan and that big, ugly beige box.

    Maybe now the marketeers will stop trying to sell me GHz-clocked processors and high-end video cards.

  54. Secretary of State MacNamara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that Secretary of State Macnamara? Cyrus Vance? The Soviets haven't existed for a very long time.

    Surprised that this one did not include mentions of the current threat of the Barbary Pirates, Nazi Germany, and the good old Mongol Hordes.

  55. Sony: need I remind you? by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Member of both the RIAA and MPAA. Real Intellectual Property nazis. They love picking on people who hack their products, like mod chip builders and AIBO programmers. They pretty much ran the Dreamcast out of business.

    I will never buy anything Sony. Ever. No matter how kawaii their stuff looks.

    Sony makes Microsoft look like choirboys.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  56. Re:they won't go up: Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. Telling is this quote from the article:

    Now the competition could much much tougher. If Hewlett-Packard's merger with Compaq goes ahead, the combined group will have revenues of about $80 billion, compared to Dell's revenues of just over $30 billion. In an industry in which economies of scale have been a big factor, size should give the bigger firm an advantage. But Dell is a ruthless competitor.

    Coming out of the block, you can bet that Dell is going to be trying real hard for all of those Compaq customers who might have been turned off of HP at some time in the past for whatever reason (rumor, techie friend opinion, bad experience). Then, there will be those who didn't like Compaq and are concerned that HP is making noises like the new company (keeping PC design centers in Houston, etc.) will be providing rebadged Compaqs.

    You just got to know that Dell will be looking at the new landscape as a growth, not profit, environment and will be pricing accordingly. Gateway and HP will have to match or beat to not get eaten alive.

  57. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude! They're getting Dells now!

  58. Efficiency and progress is ours once more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that we have the Neutron Bomb
    It's nice and cheap and clean and gets things done.
    Away with excess enemy
    With no less value to property
    No sense in war but perfect sense at home....

    Jello Biafra. Truly, he rules.

  59. The question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you ever build your own television or microwave? Didn't think so. You're comparing apples to oranges here.

  60. Re: PC Prices to Rise? by rmohr02 · · Score: 1
    If you want to buy a computer from a major brand better go for one soon while you can still get all the perks.


    Oh no, I better buy quickly to get that free year of AOL included at no extra charge!
  61. uphill both ways.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clay tablets? Luxury! In my day, we couldn't afford clay, much less the tablets. We had to hold the bits in our head. And instead of this newfangled internet we had to use hand signals. Granted, didn't work too well when it was foggy and couldn't see each other, ahh..but those were the good days! And we liked it that way.

  62. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always been a big fan of "build your own clone!" too - but it almost doesn't make sense anymore. Oh sure, from a "coolness" standpoint - there's really no substitute. That's only because LAN gamers and the computer "3lit3" turn up their noses at anything that isn't overclocked, hacked up with extra cooling fans, and has neon lighting inside of it.

    If you're a regular or "power user", however, and want value for your dollar, the home-built clone is looking less and less viable.

    In recent years, I've built several home-built clones for use at home, as well as used a couple of Dell systems. Neither Dell has given me *any* reliability problems, but all of the home-built PCs have. Conventional "wisdom" of the self-proclaimed PC gurus says "Oh, you need to use better quality parts!" Well, Adaptec SCSI controllers, Muskin memory and Asus motherboards haven't been the magic answer for me - so I'm not sure what they expect I should be buying instead?

    Fact is, most clone cases use crappy quality power supplies. I had one literally go up in smoke while the machine was plugged in but powered off! (Before that, it worked fine for about a year - but 1 year before burning up isn't what I call quality.) Cases with *good* power supplies in them cost big $'s, making the system cost uncompetitive with companies like Dell or HP.

    Then, you struggle with warranty issues. If I buy a name brand PC, at least I can buy an extended warranty that pretty much guarantees me free replacement of any parts that die for 3 years. Try that with a generic clone! You might get a manufacturer 3 year warranty on the hard drives, but that's probably about it.

    One of my Asus motherboards constantly freezes up running Win '9x. With Linux, 2000, or XP however, it's fine. (I wanted Win '98 on it because I used it for MIDI and hard disk audio recording, and had some older software.) No amount of driver updating ever got it stable, even with the latest BIOS updates.

    Of course, now, if you ask the same people that praised that board when I bought it, most will simply tell you "Oh, yeah - that chipset is screwed up. You need the new Asus model XXXX!" Whatever.... This kind of thing only happens to people building clone PCs. The name brand systems get returned as defective when they can't run a popular OS properly, so that's usually weeded out before they go on sale.

  63. Athlon Fan Premium Needed! by reynolds_john · · Score: 1

    I think I speak for the majority of us Athlon owners when I say I'd be willing to pay a bit more if someone would create an "Athlon Fan Crowbar" and distribute it with my new processor/MB combo.

  64. Why do DIY nerds brag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always hear people bragging about how they built their own system, expecting me to be impressed. If they cooked up their own silicon wafers and designed the chip, maybe. But these wizards are picking out video cards and remembering to plug in the CPU fan. Big fucking deal.

  65. Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
    Meanwhile, I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper, especially since you don't have to pay the Microsoft Tax...

    Would that that were true. :-(

    I'm looking at buying a new PC in the UK just now, not quite state-of-the-art, just behind the huge price jump to the absolute top of the line kit. I've looked at several well-reputed suppliers of individual parts, and several manufacturers' made-to-order systems as reviewed in recent PC magazines. There's no question that buying a made-for-you system is around 30% cheaper. For the best prices I found for a basic setup (mobo, proc, RAM, HDD, gfx card), I could get a whole, award-winning system, with almost identical spec + monitor + CD-RW + DVD-ROM + lots more + legal WinXP (even if I'd immediately replace it). Building your own system is definitely not a financially sound move in these parts. :-(

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereabouts in the UK are you? And what spec / price is your current best bargain?

      Where I currently live (in the North-West UK), local vendors gather at the "computer fair" every weekend. Prices for components in the fair environment are very, very competitive - It's a concentrated marketplace :) I have built several boxes lately, all costing far less than the big suppliers would have charged.
      If there are computer fairs held near your location I reccommend you pay them a visit :) If you are near Manchester, their computer fair is immense (at Bowlers Arena)
      It is probably best to go a few times before buying , if only to get to know some of the traders & notice who is there week in - week out. Initially I was a bit concerned about the somewhat dubious warranty arrangement, but most parts are covered 12 months by the manufacturer, and any hardware problems I have had in the past have been resolved very quickly and amicably, in contrast to my initial worries.
      In fact, after what is now a couple of years of computer fair shopping, I find it so much better to be dealing with real people, rather than DTMF menus & waiting on hold when you have a faulty mail order mobo. The visa tax + delivery charges can sting on mail order aswell.

      If you want to post a spec, I can tell you the prices I would expect to pay this week - I have last week's flyer somewhere.

      If you are in the north west, this site lists the locations of computer fairs: fairs.co.uk

      Besides, building a PC is much more fun - good luck - Dave :-)

    2. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by horse · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at buying a new games system, where the emphasis is on 3d RPGs.

      Will it be "cheaper" to build it rather than buy it from a vendor? Yeah, I think it will be. But bear in mind that you can't buy the kind of system I want from Dell or Gateway; they don't give you enough control over the components.

      You _can_ buy such a system from more specialized shops, but they typically charge a fair premium compared to building it yourself. (And small, specialty games systems shops don't get the kind of discounts Dell does anyhow.)

      If you want a vanilla system, it's going to be hard to beat Dell. But I think there is a market for other kinds of systems.

    3. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      award-winning system, with almost identical spec

      Like the 'award winning' tech support from Dell?

      In any case, I highly doubt it's identical. I bet the motherboard is a cheap piece of crap, sound and network are onboard, possibly so with video. The HD is probably 5400rpm. Lets not forget the WinModem as well. The monitor you will want to pass on. The CDRW is probably pre-burnproof vintage. Etc...

    4. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I don't try to compete with low end systems. Without a tax number (or tax-free number... this in the US where buisnesses can avoid taxes) I can't compete. However when I build my own systems I get UW-SCSI, and other such things not found in your low end systems. I can beat the price of a similear high end system.

      I prefer Matrox cards (I don't care about 3-d, and for 2-d they are the best). I get several hard drives so I can keep swap and /usr on differnt drives. (This isn't an issue now that memory was cheap, but on my first system 16 meg was all the ram than I could afford) I can choose my motherboard, getting something that works, whatever is cheap

    5. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      I find the advantage to building my own system is not so much that it costs less, (it is marginally less I think). But, the ability to get exactly what I want. And, to spread the cost out over time. the best example was going from a K6-2 400 to thunderbird 800. I pretty much just got the case, motherboard and CPU first. A little later decided an upgrade from a TNT to a Geforce2 MX was worthwhile, and added a DVD Drive for movie watching. It is an AMD 750 chipset so memory was unnescesary. (Don't ask. I got a really really good deal on the CPU & MB).

      I think my next upgrade will be a little more significant due to the dicontinuity in the market caused by DDR. So, I will need CPU, motherboard, and memory. Plus, by then the Geforce2-MX will be a little long in the tooth, but I am more of a strategy game player, not 3D so it coudl last quite a bit longer.

      Dastardly

    6. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by danrees · · Score: 0

      I bouht an Athlon XP system from MeshDabs Direct would cost me almost exactly the same price.

      Yes, I couldn't choose exactly what components I wanted but the spec was near enough what I would have chosen. Add to the price the value of decreased liability with a 3 year warranty, and a bundled copy of Windows XP (which I'm not actually using much at all). It clearly <b>is cheaper</b> to buy a system than build one, in the UK at least.

  66. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by LennyDotCom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    hmm I didn't realize till now that Dell was resorting to advertising in posts on /.

    And to think an AD got a +5

    --
    http://Lenny.com
  67. Couldn't agree more by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    You're so right. I've built a few machines of my own over time. The last was about three years ago (and is still going, though about due for replacement now). It took four major part swaps before I got it all working. Fortunately, I'd bought everything from the same place, and I used them because they had good customer service, so that caused no problems beyond a little frustration. We agreed that next time, I'd let them put it all together for me... :-)

    And you're right about the myth of upgrading bit-by-bit as well, IMHO. You can add new hard drive space, but mobo, processor, RAM and gfx card often go together. If you're replacing that lot, you're really down to "I can reuse the monitor, printer, KB and mouse" rather than "I could just upgrade the mobo, processor, RAM and gfx card" anyway.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  68. while we're at it, let's raise taxes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It always amuses me when an industry tries to recoup losses and/or bump up proceeds by raising prices ... only to find themselves running into that economic wall called the point of diminishing returns.

  69. Wouldn't this defeat the purpose? by davew2040 · · Score: 1

    It is and has been the case that with large companies like Dell and Gateway, the farther you go from the "standard configuration" the more disproportionately expensive the systems become. For a high-end PC, it just makes more sense to configure and build it yourself; we're talking the difference of $2000 self-built to $2750-$3000 from the large brands for identical or superior parts. This is pretty significant. Feel free to check me on these numbers, but for most buyers they're representative.

    This isn't the case with the value PC's. Dell/Gateway/etc do the majority of their business on this venue, and because of their various volume discounts acquire they can meet this demand quite well. For instance, it's common knowledge that Dell can get fast processors from Intel at knock-out prices (then sell them with sub-par components in other areas to unsuspecting consumers, but that's another story). When you're looking for a real budget system (say, $750 sans display), it's very difficult to compete with their product; consider also the technical support and warranty offered by a big company, and it actually makes a lot of sense to buy from them.

    By raising the prices across the board, it seems to me that they'd be losing their primary market advantage (or niche, if you will, huge though it may be). I already know I can get a better deal on high-end systems, so what real incentive does a non-beginner have to buy Dell or Gateway if they can go ahead and get value systems cheaper by setting them up manually? Not a whole lot.

    Of course, for the past few years the non-beginner crowd hasn't been the domain of the big makers anyway (due to unreliable system quality, software bloat, lack of alternative operating systems, you name it), so my guess is that Dell won't be too concerned. However, a possible upside to this is that smaller vendors might get a healthy boost when they can again offer a price advantage on the low-end systems. If the big makers want to up their prices, they can go right ahead. But I sure do hope that the retail hardware vendors don't take this as a cue to raise their own prices in turn.

  70. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by not_cub · · Score: 1
    I built a computer last summer, when part prices were low apparently (I hadn't looked until this thread popped up). I already have a great 21" Sony monitor from my job, and a Dvorak keyboard. I use Linux, not Windows. If I neeeed to use Windows for something, I have a copy of 98 that came with my last computer (which is now unused. That's legal right?). So for me, on a student budget, the choice was £500 for a bottom of the range Dell computer, a windows coaster and a monitor I'll chuck in the bin, or £500 for the fastest Athlon, half a gig of RAM and a 40gig 7200rpm hard drive with quality components. Going the build route is going to be even more economical next time, because I will be able to use my case, psu and so on. But then, I don't think Dell are aiming at scavengers like me.

    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
  71. I agree!! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    If you have a system that uses at least the Intel 440BX chipset, you can run most current software pretty easily, even Windows XP Professional.

    The big bottleneck nowadays is not the CPU, it's not enough memory and too-slow hard drives. Fortunately, memory prices for PC-100/133 DIMM's aren't really that bad, and most 440BX chipset motherboards with a BIOS upgrade will support modern 7200 RPM ATA-100 hard drive (they are backward-compatible with ATA-33).

    I'll almost bet that once you get 256 MB of RAM and a 7200 RPM ATA-100 hard drive, your computer's performance could increase as much as 60%.

    I'm running a Celeron A 466 MHz system using an Abit AB-BM6 motherboard, 256 MB of RAM, and a 10 GB ATA-66 hard drive; most everything I throw at it runs pretty reasonably quick. :-)

  72. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes

    This should be the next /. poll. Perhaps something like:

    I often build supercomputers
    I've build my own home machine
    My friend helped me build a machine once
    I plugged in my machine and connected all the cables correctly
    I can put batteries in a flashlight correctly
    Generic CowboyNeal choice

  73. an article by alanak · · Score: 1

    here's a quick article giving a few examples from sony and apple about price increases:
    Sony Pushes PC Prices Higher

  74. Doesn't matter to me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care, I never buy new computers. I picked up my newest box for $50 a couple months ago. An IBM PC-300GL, 433 Mhz Celeron. It does everything I need.

    I won't even think about wasting my money on a new computer.

  75. That's EXPENSIVE! by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2

    You can get 256MB PC2100 (CL2.5) in good old Europe for under 70 Euros including (local) sales tax. And the Euros are pretty cheap at the moment, too :-/. DDR prices.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  76. Price not the only consideration by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2
    While it's all well and good to say that it's now cheaper to buy pre-built computers than to build, there are a couple of other reasons why you might still consider building.
    • Environmentalism. I always upgrade because I don't like the idea of an entire computer going into a landfill. I kept the full-size AT case I bought in 1990 for as long as possible -- the only reason I eventually ditched it was because of the switch to ATX form factor. I had the same case, the same power supply, etc. running nonstop for over a decade. I plan to keep my ATX case(s) for at least that long. Hey, it's the only planet we've got; we might as well take care of it!
    • Microsoft boycott. I'm willing to pay more for a PC that doesn't have Windows pre-installed, just on principle. I promise to go to the grave having shelled out exactly $0.00 to Mr. Gates in my lifetime.
    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  77. Rolling Your Own by Zillatron · · Score: 1
    Do you build your own TV? Probably not. Microwave?

    I build my own PCs because of two reasons:
    1) If there are parts I care about I can put in exactly what i want.
    2) If there are parts that don't matter with respect to the use of that machine, I probably have them lying around in the form of components on some old dead box someone gave me for fixing their newer one.

    I never really cared what the lightbulb in my microwave looked like or where it was placed. My TV gets all of the channels? Great!! What else will I be asking of it...?

  78. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I am a software guy. I spend my nerd thots on trying to figure out things like why some people like fricken OOP, and not on hardware.

    I never really had that much interest in the hardware beyond a basic understanding. My hands are too clumsy and large, and I cracked the &@#$ motherboard the last time I put in extra memory because the doggone things wouldn't lock into place. Fortunately, it still worked miraculously. If I paid somebody, then I could demand a replacement if it cracked on them.

    I might add a new drive and try to add memory, but I decided not to try to learn hardware by trial and error because I don't wanna deal with flakey hardware problems. It if does not work the first time and 40 minutes with the manual does not uncover it, to the shop i go.

  79. Just get an old(er) RISC workstation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, the overall quality of x86 PC and even Apple PowerMac stuff is abysmal (I deploy PCs, Apples and Suns in my campus computer labs). PCs especially have a _very_ short lifespan prior to strange logic board / memory related problems and a disproportionate number of PowerMacs either arrive DOA or have problems similar to PCs, though perhaps a year later than a PC would...

    I purchased a DEC Alpha Personal Workstation 600au and a Sun Ultra 5 recently after my two PII's started acting strange. I also have a DEC AlphaStation 200 4/166 and an SGI Indy R4400-175 that are both over five years old and apart from hard disk drives have _NEVER_ had any problems with them.

    Installed Debian v2.2r5 and testing (3.0) on the AlphaStations and Ultra 5 and expect to keep them running for at least five years (if not longer).

    There's something to be said about Big Iron (well, larger than usual) if you want reliability and true long-term value.

    What's more, surplus RISC workstation/server equipment is fairly inexpensive and does all the standard PC fare (plays MPEG movies, surf the web, do development) albeit a little slower than your typical gigahertz x86 systems.

  80. Good News For Me!! by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    I work in a local computer shop (blatant plug: PCW Computer in Orange,CT,USA). so either our prices don't change(and we get all of their business), or our prices go up(and we reap the rewards!).

    Sounds like win- win to me.

    -D

  81. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Conventional "wisdom" of the self-proclaimed PC gurus says "Oh, you need to use better quality parts!"

    Brilliantly followed by:

    Well, Adaptec SCSI controllers, Muskin memory and Asus motherboards haven't been the magic answer

    And adding insult to injury:

    Fact is, most clone cases use crappy quality power supplies. I had one literally go up in smoke while the machine was plugged in but powered off

    OK, make up your mind, dude. Either you're using quality components, or you're not. You bought a case that came with a power supply. And here you learn your first lesson of "self-proclaimed PC gurudom":

    Cases that come with power supplies and simply the cheapest plastic container for CPU you can buy.

    Lesson number 2 (hey, I'm a nice guy):

    Power supplies that come with cheap ass cases will go up in smoke even under 0 load.

    The name brand systems get returned as defective when they can't run a popular OS properly, so that's usually weeded out before they go on sale.

    Installing your own OS is not supported. Dell will just re-image the machine and send it back to you, fully working, as it was when you first got it.

  82. Re:they won't go up: Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If Hewlett-Packard's merger with Compaq goes ahead, the combined group will have revenues of about $80 billion, compared to Dell's revenues of just over $30 billion. In an industry in which economies of scale have been a big factor, size should give the bigger firm an advantage.

    I don't know what crap the author was smoking, but whether you're $80B, $30B or even $1B, you already have maximum economies of scale. There's a point of diminishing returns, where a given vendor just really doesn't care how big you are, they can't go any lower on price.

  83. Re:Who cares?-obsolete. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I know only one single reason (for consumer, not prosumer) to get a 'branded' computer: Support. 1-3 years will be almost enough for everyone."

    I can't imagine why? The computer will be obsolete by the first year. Longer only makes the problem worse.

  84. Re:Most?-YMMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finny, I have the same. No problems so far. Oh well YMMV of course.

  85. Re:Most?-warrenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "local shops are the way to go. i like a place where 3 years warranty actually means "if at any time in the next 3 years, something breaks, drive it in, and we'll fix it as fast as possible." "'

    Problem is finding a local shop that will give you such a long warrenty.

    Two the computer will be obsolete by the first year.

  86. Re:Can you assemble a QUIET PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding, I had no problem making my PC a lot quieter by removing unnecessary components, such as the fan on the front, the fan on the CPU and the floppy drive. By just carefullly setting up an airflow path so that it draws the hot air off of the CPU (and graphics card, to some extent) without cables getting in the way, it was very easy to keep my CPU temperature below the "normal temperature" range of my friends' noisy computers full of fans. I also just happened to have gotten a new (well, cheap used) hard drive that both has greater capacity and is quieter than my old hard drive. But the PC is still pretty quiet even with both drives. One big problem was my CD-RW drive's high pitched whine (while idle!) but it has other problems.

  87. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1

    >>>One of my Asus motherboards constantly freezes up running Win '9x. With Linux, 2000, or XP however, it's fine.>>>> umm sounds like even you should know that that because 9x is like dos and Linux, 2000, XP are stable operating systems

  88. Re:Can you assemble a QUIET PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My home-built PC has only one fan, in the power supply. The hard drive is the noisiest part. I've really started noticing the sound from the fan in my laptop since I quieted my PC.

  89. And the "speed"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't mention the MegaHertz phenomenom at all... :)

    Funny thing; I live in Finland, and have noticed it is quite common for finnish people to use only the word "mega" when referring to the computer's speed, hdd space, and memory, totally not understanding which of them we are really talking about after all.

    A simple example of a conversation between a non-computer person and a tech person:

    - Hi! I bought myself a new computer yesterday.
    - Oh, what happened to your previous computer?
    - It was too slow, it had only 400 mega's and now I have 20 Giga's. And the blue screen was annoying. Now I have the new Windows XP. It is more stable, the blue screen came only once yesterday.
    - I see, but were you talking about the hard disk space or the speed there? I noticed you said 400 megs and 20 gigs, but as I remember you had a 400MHz processor and a 4 Gb Hard drive on your previous computer.
    - Yes this is very fast, it is a Pentium IV.
    - What were the megahertzes again? (As if it would matter anyway...;)
    - 20 Giga I suppose.. or was it.. yes it was 900 megas. No, 512 mega's..
    - Argh, could you make up your mind about it?
    -----

    Those "normal" computer users rarely even know the differences between hertz, bits and bytes so things could get quite messy if a tech person was not prepared, or if there was another non-tech person delivering a message between the tech and the other non-tech person... Still with me? Oh well... Yeah, and modems, isdn's and adsl's can be difficult for people to understand. (I was listening a computer (modem vs. isdn) conversation of two of my cousins last easter and it was quite funny too..)

    - Voice of Ambience -

  90. Part of the joy ... by ThorbyBaslam · · Score: 0

    Part of the joy of building my own PCs is that I can spread the cost of the hardware over a period of time.
    When the time comes for me to think about upgrading (every 30 seconds it seems), I dont rush out and buy a complete set of new parts.

    I can choose which parts should be upgraded, then wait 6 months until my bank balance recovers, and then upgrade something else.

  91. I wouldn't build it for others, but for myself... by Kjella · · Score: 2

    I hardluy ever need a completely new computer. With prices dropping all the time (with some exceptions but mostly unpredictable ones), buying for the future is a joke. Every part of my machine has been replaced at some time or the other, most if not all multiple times, but it's never been completely replaced with something brand new. I'm on my 6th CPU, 5th(?) GFX card, 3rd case (small to large to ATX) and kazillionth HDD, and the idea is to upgrade when needed, and not before. Sending it in to some shop to do every little thing costs some in the long run, so I'd rather do that myself.

    For a complete PC I know a nice shop that'll put together whatever pieces I want for a brand new PC for 35$ if I want to. After all the trouble I had getting the @#%$@#% fan to snap on last time, it'll be worth it.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  92. Prices based on components and reflect such. by shlamo · · Score: 1

    I think a lot of people don't really understand why prices fluctuate like they do. Especially when you have large manufacturers such as Dell, Gateway, Micron, etc.

    These companies certainly can adjust prices to allow for more profit; the same as any other business. What it all comes down to is the part manufacturers raising or lowering prices due to a number of factors.

    Everyone seems to be tied up on LCD's so lets go there. (Geez guys don't you read theInquirer)

    LCD Monitor Prices Set to Soar

    LCD prices continue rise as CRTs decline

    LCD screens cost on average $15-30 US per screen. Add all that plastic bezel crap and I'm sure that adds up to about $350 US ;)

    So, when Company X in Taiwan wants to raise prices on LCDs (say maybe by discontinuing its 15" LCD Monitor Line like Samsung did earlier this month) they simply raise them. There are, however, certain economic aspects to this which are boring and as such we shouldn't discuss. So basically the self induced shortage of LCD's by large companies in the East, coupled with high demand for LCD monitors, and other phenomena (Earthquakes anyone?) all affect those distributors so that by the time Dell, Micron, etc. get their LCD's they have to compensate their pricing to reflect those factors. All simply because these companies like money, want more of it, and want a continual flow of instead of settling for less money.

    So that is why LCD's are expensive (Got tired of people saying that "This Company" was raising their LCD prices when we all know that they don't even make the LCDs, they just slap their logo on the damn things).

    Now onto Ram. I am of the opinion that as computer technology ages we should see a gradual decrease in price as the technology slowly becomes obsolete. For some things, such as ram, this doesn't ever seem to be true.

    Yes, I now tell stories to my children about how I used to be able to get a 256mb Stick of SDRAM for $15 dollars and a 512mb Stick for $35. The excess supply no longer exists so Ram manufacturers (Some have coined the phrase Dramurai [Probably Mike Magee]) sort of make sure that there isn't too much of it in the market anymore so that pricing stays very competitive. We have seen the controversial RDRAM steadily decline in price as DDR Motherboards started to replace Intel's Rdram only P4 Chipsets. DDR and RDRAM are pretty much even now which is amazing considering that at one time you could expect to pay $600 US for 512mb of RDRAM (ouch). So, as everyone should know SDRAM is back to normal and the RAM Manufacturers keep coming up with creative new ways to introduce new ram types DDR333 anyone that can increase demand on different modules and they just kind of pull a wheel barrow of cash up to JEDEC so it all (eventually) gets through. Don't believe me? Look for DDR400 in the next month or so.

    So Ram to is at the mercy of the manufacturer and then the retailer. It sure doesn't help that when you buy a new computer from Company X that a 512mb Stick of PC2100 DDR (DDR266 for those of you who think that way) which goes for $170-$200 on Crucial.com costs $300-500 to upgrade. Watch out for those tricks.

    So the question comes down to: Are PC's really getting more expensive? Maybe through retail vendors. Anywhere else, the prices are pretty much the same with some fluctuations every now and then which are usually based on economic decisions based by the companies that manufacturer everything.

    Calm down the fire that fuels the troll inside of you. Delete the nasty letter you're about to send to Dell and try and appreciate how very many factors affect the end result.

    :)

  93. Re:I wouldn't build it for others, but for myself. by more · · Score: 1

    >buying for the future is a joke

    I always buy the hard disk "for the future" to
    reduce the frequency of a completely new
    installation.

    --

    -- Imperial units must die --

  94. Bah, just purchase it by FallLine · · Score: 2
    Meanwhile, I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper, especially since you don't have to pay the Microsoft Tax... ;#)
    I disagree. I am plenty capable of building my own system, but I haven't done so in years. Put simply, the level of competition amongst PC OEMs is so high that it is extremely unlikely that you, as an individual, can even hope to purchase the parts (or software, depending your your needs), assemble, service (e.g., replacing defective parts), and purchase the software as cost effectively as the OEM can. Yes, they enjoy some profits, but their margins are almost certainly less than your increased costs due to your relative inefficiencies. This is especially true if you take into account that your time is, hopefully, worth more than the people that normally handle the grunt work. Anyways, I think the mistake that many people make, ignoring the ego factor, is they compare apples and oranges. They'll assemble an overclocked system from a variety of less reputable vendors and compare it a similar performing Dell system, but they ignore the poorer reliability, trouble in replacing/returning parts, the cost of their time (less an issue when you're young I guess), etc. It may be true that you don't need or want things like technical support or the bundled software, but it's not as if you can't purchase a PC without these options at the appropriate price. Sigh
  95. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, onsite service as in A+ 'certified' brain dead Unisys monkey that will tinker for four hours while sweating profusely then pronounce that you need to send it in to dell after having wasted half of your day.

  96. $2700? wimp! by hawk · · Score: 2
    My news system is about $5300, not counting the compilers . . . and, YES, I *do* need that much, thank you . . .


    And for those who have asked in the past, yes, it's still the same system, and it actually, finallly, and supposedly arrives tomorrorow--so it will sit for a week while I'm off at a conference.


    hawk, who *Really* wishes his number-smasher had been here to use for the last week while getting ready for the conference.

  97. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by bartle · · Score: 2
    Conventional "wisdom" of the self-proclaimed PC gurus says "Oh, you need to use better quality parts!" Well, Adaptec SCSI controllers, Muskin memory and Asus motherboards haven't been the magic answer for me - so I'm not sure what they expect I should be buying instead?

    Hey, I'm in the same boat. I built a completely new machine a few months ago, spared no cost and used the best components I could find. I wound up with a machine that was about as stable as something I could pick up at Best Buy and had only marginal performance gains. My theory is that QA in the component market no longer exists while the big name companies spend quite a few dollars making sure their machines can do 95% of what they expect the customers to want. If this trend continues, building your own computer will be a fool's endevour in just a few years.

  98. one purpose v multi purpose by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    A microwave only has one purpose. A computer has several. In fact, if there were microwave parts out there that would let you cook different foods better (a 'cordon bleu' style microwave, or a 'fast food only' microwave) people would probably go for those.

    Most people don't build their own TV, but they do assemble their own entertainment systems (DVD, CD, speakers, etc).

  99. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by jelle · · Score: 2

    In many cases, it's not brand names of the components that give you quality (anymore). All mainboard manufacturers fluke every once in a while, all drive manufacturers do, a bunch of cdrw manufacturers did, etc. But also, many lower-budget manufacturers make excellent high quality and long-term stable products every once in a while.

    In any case, motherboard manufacturers such as Abit are fair in their warranty service, if you don't mind waiting two months for your repaired item. Drive manufacturers also are good at sending replacement items for broken drives.

    But you don't want to be without PC for weeks waiting for warranty repair, so lesson number one: When you build PCs yourself, build multiple PCs so you can keep spare components laying around.

    A problem here is also that it's getting harder to identify which components are of good quality. Review websites will give you some information, but of course nobody has long-term stability tests for those brand-new chipset mainboards.

    BUT, neither does HP, or Compaq, or Dell. The last Athlon-carrying HP I've examined contained a mainboard based on the lobu KL133 SDRAM(!) chipset (further rant deleted). Bringing your broken PC back to the retailer 9 months after you bought it also doesn't give to an instant fix or replacement, they might send it to the manufacturer for you though, saving you some shipping cost.

    What I'm trying to say is that 'whiteboxing' your own PC is not as simple as going onto pricewatch and finding the cheapes supplier for the latest and hottest hardware reviewed by tom on the web.

    Succesfull whiteboxing requires keeping good track of all review websites (and top magazines such as the german "CT magazine"), and paying special attention to stability issues. Even then, don't go whiteboxing just for one PC, because you'll have much more trouble diagnosing which part is broken or unstable in case you have problems. When you have multiple PCs that you are 'whiteboxing', you can often quickly identify problem components by swapping them around.

    For succesfull whiteboxing, you will want to run your own stability tests (memtest86, cpu+disk loads, benchmarks, etc), and you will want to have alternate (varying brand or model) components to swap in and out to find the optimal combination.

    You will want to do all testing while you don't have to wait for it, so it will have to be at least your second PC, so you can keep surfing the web for example while a 48hour test runs.

    Then, you want to deal with suppliers that you can simply send low quality components back to with not much more than a quoted reason like 'unstable', 'unreliable', or 'incompatible'. If you can't find such a supplier, you want one that is 20+% cheaper than the rest so you can simply stoss one in every 5 components you buy in the bin if they are pieces of junk.

    For most people, that means that they can only be succesfull whiteboxers if they build computers for themselves, and their family, and maybe the aunts friends, the neighbours daughter, their pets outdour house and that cute girl in the bar.

    But that's the way it has always been, and nothing is changing there at all. Whiteboxing is not for the amateur, if you want the perfect system and you're not ready to go all the way, then buy your stuff at the dealer and buy the expensive extended warranty, and forget about whiteboxing. If you don't mind messing with the stuff, reading and learing about the stuff, and doing it for others too (including fixing it when they bring it back broken (which they will!)), then go ahead you've found yourself a more interesting alternative to fishing or stamp collecting.

    That's what whiteboxing is all about, it's not about spending a couple of evenings at pricewatch and toms web site after watching a technet show and then flushing the cash for the 'perfect' system that you will love for years to come.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  100. Low-End Increases by Snover · · Score: 1
    The only thing that worries me is that they'll increase the cost of low-end systems that I like. It's been a long time since I did anything but basic coding and editing.
    Why are you worried? You don't need anything above a 386/33 to code anyway. What are you, some kind of crazy person that needs to run Windows 4?
    --

    [insert witty comment here]