Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Wal-Modem, Culpability, Misquotes

Slashback with a weekend worth of updates on Wal-Mart's OS-free PC, the End of the Simpsons, Harlan Ellison v. AOL, wireless goodies and more. Read on below for the goods.

There must be some mistake; this is what I wanted. Masem writes: "The review of the OS-less PCs sold through Wal-Mart brought out a lot of comments on the inclusion of a WinModem, effectively requiring Windows to make the computer work correctly. However, NewsForge reports that shortly after that posting, Microtel, the makers of these computers, wrote back to the reviewer and indicated that new versions of the systems will ship with Linux-friendly modems from now on. Nice to see a company that knows its target audience and how to make them happy."

Thanks, Microtel!

Next: ethernet cable manufacturers. cpt kangarooski writes: "For those tuning in late, Harlan Ellison sued AOL (among others) for having the temerity to permit users to upload copies of his copyrighted works across their networks on the Usenet. As it turns out, AOL was in the right, and got a summary judgment against Ellison.

The opinion by Judge Cooper is located here in PDF format Given his reputation, Ellison will likely appeal."

Welcome to Ix, please take off your shoes. cayle clark writes "A few months back I asked slashdot about shopping in the Akihabara, Tokyo's famous "electric town," and got lots of good advice. Well, now I been and went there, took some pictures, and posted an illustrated account here. Netting it out, it's a keen place to wander, and prices are in some (but only some) cases lower than in the USA."

Hacking at the ties that bind Following up on the new venture in wireless from the LinuxCare crew, Dave Sifry writes "802.11b Networking News wrote up a summary of the new Sputnik Gateway release today, codenamed Stagecoach. The Community Gateway code runs from CD and turns a computer with an ethernet card and Prism 802.11b card into a secure authenticating firewalled 802.11b Access Point. New features of this release include support for desktop cards, like the Linksys WMP11 PCI card, which means that you can turn your old 486 in a closet into a cheap secure wireless router."

I'd rather they save Futurama, but gift horse, teeth, etc. Remik writes "Yahoo News is carrying this story letting Simpsons creator Matt Groening set the record straight that the Simpsons isn't winding down and that it isn't on the ropes. He claims he was misquoted and misunderstood in a Financial Times of London article that came out earlier this week and that he does indeed has stories for years and years. What if Marge became a robot? Hmm..."

Has anyone detected the envelope with the winner's name yet? SoundGuy666 writes "Looks like SETI made it past that 500 million milestone - wonder who won the $500 prize..."

410 comments

  1. 300 episodes? by jlowery · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How come when I watch it's always a rerun?

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
    1. Re:300 episodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're probably watching the wrong chanel, foo.

      around here, fox runs it once or twice a week (usually new or as-of-this-week) while UPN runs in many many times every day (always reruns).

    2. Re:300 episodes? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      How come when I watch it's always a rerun?

      Because everything but the latest show is by definition a rerun. :)

      Thus unless you watch the one thirty minute slot on TV that contains the new Simpsons show, you will by definition ALWAYS be stuck watching a rerun, MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAA!

  2. "Isn't on the ropes?" by NickRob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Funny, the episode last night showed a huge lack of imagination. The network may want to beat the horse for more cash, but that doesn't mean that it's not in deep trouble.

    1. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by dimator · · Score: 1

      That's amazing. I thought the episode last night was very well written, and hilarious. One of the best this season, to be sure.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by (startx) · · Score: 4, Funny

      did you notice what bart was writing on the chalkboard too? :P "I will not spread false rumors of being canceled" or something like that. I busted out laughing for like 5 minutes.

    3. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by kellin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was the funniest thing about the entire episode. I'd have to say that last night's episode was the worst I'd seen of this season. It had its funny moments, but overall left me rather "ho hum". The previous two episodes were *far* funnier.

      --
      GWB to President of Brazil - "You have blacks, too?"
    4. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by evilquaker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's amazing. I thought the episode last night was very well written, and hilarious. One of the best this season, to be sure.

      Maybe it was one of the best this season, but you have to admit the whole "you're not in any kind of physical pain... the only kind of pain men understand" joke was really clunky and lame... as was the Marge-reads-Homer's mind bit... Neither of those would've happened in episodes past...

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
    5. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by Phigs · · Score: 1
      ...as was the Marge-reads-Homer's mind bit
      Marge wasn't reading his mind, she was reading the way in which his pupil was moving.
    6. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by madenosine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Season 14 should be great...13 is just a turning point

    7. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by Hatechall · · Score: 2, Funny

      I must admit some of the jokes were damn lame...BUT

      YOU CAN RUN BUT YOU CANT GLIDE!!!

      You just cant put a price on something like that!

    8. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that doesn't mean that it's not in deep trouble.

      Did you watch it again tonight? :) If so, it's not in trouble.

    9. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by dimator · · Score: 2

      Ya, I had to explain the joke to my fellow watchers who are not addicted to internet news sites. :P

      The funny thing is, the Simpsons is almost never comedically punctual, because the episodes are written some time in advance. They usually can't take advantage of breaking news stories until a few weeks later, but in this case, it seems as though they made the switch at the last minute.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    10. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember what season it was, but it was
      recent and a season finale i believe where the
      entire family was on a train with a hobo guy...
      Lisa exclaims "i wanna go to wilmington!" and I
      believe Bart said "I wanna visit a screen door
      factory!" Well this scared the crap out of me
      because if you also remember the Simpsons special
      "Behind the Laughter", they use those exact same
      scenes, (at least the audio portion) at the very
      end of that special. Homer leans over to the
      editor or whoever and whispers "This'll be the last season." "It's a prophecy!!!" I thought...
      I had to call up all my friends at that moment.

    11. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      Anyone else notice that FOX rarely shows the intro anymore. If they cut everything except the "family running to the sofa scene" I guess they can fit in another commercial.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    12. Re:"Isn't on the ropes?" by Mignon · · Score: 2, Troll
      I'd have to say that last night's episode was the worst I'd seen of this season.

      "Worst episode ever." - Comic Book Guy

  3. Usenet? by Denor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harlan Ellison sued AOL (among others) for having the temerity to permit users to upload copies of his copyrighted works across their networks on the Usenet


    Come on man, get with it! Suing over usenet piracy is so 90's. It's all about suing p2p now!



    Next thing you know, he'll start railing off on the evils of DOOM.

    --
    -Denor
    1. Re:Usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Does this crash the browser?

    2. Re:Usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! are you that guy who was right near the entrance of one of the MSU dorms on the first floor with the two huge monitors by chance?

    3. Re:Usenet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meh, no. Isn't this better?

      Google feeling lucky search for "evil javascript".

    4. Re:Usenet? by nojayuk · · Score: 1
      Harlan over-reacts a lot. Dave Langford wrote a short piece in his monthly (multiple Hugo award-winning) SF fan newsletter ANSIBLE about the court AOL decision (see http://www.ansible.co.uk/ and check the April 2002 edition). Harlan got to hear about this, and the result was a call for his technically-enhanced friends to DoS the ANSIBLE site. Basically he was trying to get people to commit a Federal offence because he didn't like Dave's reporting of his court loss.

      {Begin quote}

      HARLAN ELLISON - Sunday, April 7 2002 19:33:30

      A SMALL FAVOR, IF YOU HAVE A MOMENT:

      Apparently the English fan David Langford, who publishes a fanzine called Ansible, has chosen either to misunderstand, or intentionally misinterpret, the recent preliminary finding by Judge Cooper in my lawsuit against AOL. He is passing along--on his electronic site--this misinformation with the conclusion ELLISON LOSES AOL SUIT

      {Clip}

      And so: the small favor. Would some one or another of you find your e.way onto that ANSIBLE site, whatever and wherever it is, and put a chokehold on their crowing, lest they have to eat those rottten eggs poached in their own perfidy.

      {End quote}

      Harlan detests the Internet. That doesn't stop him from asking others who use and understand it to commit a crime for him.

      (Oh, and by the way, Dave Langford is Welsh, not English).

    5. Re:Usenet? by disco_stu00 · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, he'll start railing off on the evils of DOOM.

      That is already being taken care of by a US District Judge.
      Salon on Video Games and Free Speech

  4. Blackboard comment by gss · · Score: 1

    Last night's episode made some sort of reference to the cancellations rumours and I kind of had to wonder what that was all about. I guess now I know.

    1. Re:Blackboard comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for sharing with us your every thought Mr. GSS.

    2. Re:Blackboard comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously i was almost about to shit myself wondering what gss thought of the "blackboard comment" which i can only guess is some sort of african american based homosexual reference that i will not attempt to decipher

      HAIL SATAN

    3. Re:Blackboard comment by CmdrTaco+(editor) · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, I didn't catch the reference at first either. For those of you that didn't watch the show, the opening credits every week feature Bart writing a message repeatedly on the school chalk board, repetition style. Every week there is a new message. Last night, Bart wrote "I will never joke about cancelling the show again."

    4. Re:Blackboard comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Bart writing a message repeatedly on the school chalk board, repetition style.

      ...and he did it many times, repetitiously, in a redundant kind of repetitive way.

      ...more than once.

  5. Microtel by NickRob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, they're just starting out. We can look at all the errors of every computer manufacturer in their first models. The Altair 8088 and Apple 1 were both kits, requiring a great deal of know-how (especially then) and allowed for a large deal of Human error (This was in the days of shag carpetting). Microtel is going to have a large amount of future successes for freeing us from the evil tyrant of Microsoft! Thank you, Microtel for having the balls to stand up!

    1. Re:Microtel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the apple I wasn't entirely a kit -- the mobo came with everything attached. It didn't include a monitor, or keyboard, or even a case (although they did work out a deal with a cupertino furniture manufacturor to make the wooden cases often seen), but they weren't the assemble-it-yourself kits that earlier home computers were.

    2. Re:Microtel by madenosine · · Score: 1

      Uhm. there have always been os-free computers.

      Don't most unix users build their own pcs anyways? for the 1337ness factor?

    3. Re:Microtel by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Heh -- didn't even have a PSU. But for all that it was pretty good given the competition of the day.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Microtel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most UNIX users don't build any hardware. Typically they have a login at work that they use to log onto the UNIX box to get real work done. The hardware is in some other part of the building where they're generally not allowed.

    5. Re:Microtel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is about people who use unix at home; the type who would buy an OS-less computer at Wal-Mart

    6. Re:Microtel by 1155 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thank you, Microtel for having the balls to stand up!

      Why in the world would anyone buy any machine made by a company? I bought a "packard bell" and that was my first and last computer buy. Since then, building them has become mere guesswork, and you say that Microtel has balls? They have the smarts enough to know an emerging market of people too cheap to buy a piece of software, or who went into a pool with fellow people to buy one copy of software and then to let it go around.

      But why would you, and slashdot reader, buy one? Isn't knowing the difference between ide and eide required for reading slashdot. Just a thought.

    7. Re:Microtel by bilbobuggins · · Score: 1
      Don't most unix users build their own pcs anyways? for the 1337ness factor?

      Yes. Of course. Why I wouldn't even own a PC if I didn't think it made me c00l.

      Why can't people seem to understand that many of us don't want to use MS but still want something that's quick to set up and easy to use?
      Most nights I don't have anywhere near the time I would need to be sitting in a pile of chips just so I can surf the web later on.

      Hats off to Microtel for filling a growing hole in the PC market. I plan on buying one of these as soon as I can up my savings account some (the main reason I don't have any time to sit around h4x0ring my 0wn b0x3n).

  6. big surprise by jethro200 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surprise surprise! Someone got it wrong and sold a lot more issues by misquoting the Simpson's creator, saying that he was going to stop making new episodes. How convenient. It is such a rarity too, that a magazine would misquote someone to have a big story. Of course, I'm sure that it was entirely unintentional...

    1. Re:big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They're both right. The simpsons is closer to the end than the beginning. Matt said that the simpsons has many years left to go which is true, but if you think they're going to go on for more than 12 years, you're dreaming.

    2. Re:big surprise by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Simpsons started in '89, it's 2002, ummmm... Let me think back to 1st grade.... carry the 1..... oh yeah, that's 13 years!

    3. Re:big surprise by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Especially when the magazine is owned by time warner, a competitor of Fox.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  7. Walmart - Microsoft should sue them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For encouraging piracy with these OS-free PCs. I mean, how many Wal-Mart customers are going to run an Open Source operating system ? Not many I'll bet most of them simply pirate a copy of Windows!

  8. Greater source of hot air:Bob Metcalfe ot Ellison? by glrotate · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ellison is without doubt the most pompous jackass I've ever seen in my life.

  9. Moral Dilemma. by Fat+Casper · · Score: 5, Funny
    Clean PC... Wal-Mart...

    Clean PC... Wal-Mart...

    Clean PC... Wal-Mart... Aaaaaagh!

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    1. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here is your solution for a Windows-free PC. Although it can run Office if you really need it to.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    2. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no kidding. Check out this one: http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12962

    3. Re:Moral Dilemma. by BusterB · · Score: 2

      Why in the world is apple.com linked with mammals.org? What do apples have to do with mammals, other than mammals that eat apples, though lizards and birds eat apples too?

    4. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Good question, and I don't really have the answer. I think has to do with an ad campaign that never made it past the conceptual stage. I can't remember how I found that, but hey, at least it doesn't point to goatse!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    5. Re:Moral Dilemma. by dattaway · · Score: 0, Troll

      Everyone has seen goatse.cx, but there is something even google's image cache won't touch.

    6. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a moral delima, seeing as how I recently just got my Stockholder Proxy Vote form from Wal-Mart and was very unhappy to see the choices the board have recommended a vote FOR.

      In short, Wal-Mart doesn't mind discrimination or child labor. Oh, sure, they'll swear that's not true, but their actions speak louder than words.

      Naturally, I'm voting against the board's recommendations.

    7. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not often you see an unmodded +1 post with a goatse link!

    8. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is so fake

    9. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can somebody describe what's at yi.com? I'm too scared to click through and look myself.

    10. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's this fat bitch shittin' a fountain on herself in a bathtub. quite gross. same level as goatse. actually, i'd have to it's worse actually. someone needs to make an ASCII pic of that actually. that would be quite impressive. (just for the fact they could stare at it long enough and draw it)

      i'm just too curious to not click on a link.

    11. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catholic readings and Disney movie reviews. Nothing much really. Pretty lame.

    12. Re:Moral Dilemma. by mellonhead · · Score: 1


      mammal Pronunciation Key (mml)
      n.
      Any of various warm-blooded vertebrate animals of the class Mammalia, including humans, characterized by a covering of hair on the skin and, in the female, milk-producing mammary glands for nourishing the young.

    13. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Phork · · Score: 2

      im guessing it had something to do with evolution, because i seem to recal that they registered it about the time darwin became a public project.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    14. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of those people who buys a single share of a companie's stock so you can complain, eh?

    15. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing...some people will eat anything!

    16. Re:Moral Dilemma. by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      Down on Astor Place in NYC they sell T-Shirts with this picture on it. Very ho-hum once you've seen it a few times.

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    17. Re:Moral Dilemma. by w4r3z_d00d · · Score: 1

      im just glad they didnt show her pubic hair, that would just be in bad taste.

    18. Re:Moral Dilemma. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Whois says they registered it in 1998:

      Registrant:
      Apple Computer, Inc. (MAMMALS2-DOM)
      1 Infinite Loop
      Cupertino, CA 95014


      Domain Name: MAMMALS.ORG


      Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
      Eddings, Kenneth (KAE8)
      kafe99@EXCITE.COM
      KAFE
      2138 King Court
      Santa CLara, CA 95051
      US
      408 247-3926 408 974-3103


      Record expires on 22-Jul-2003.
      Record created on 22-Jul-1998.
      Database last updated on 7-May-2002 08:39:51 EDT.


      Domain servers in listed order:


      NSERVER.APPLE.COM 17.254.0.50
      NSERVER2.APPLE.COM 17.254.0.59

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    19. Re:Moral Dilemma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's one of the best things about mammals, the milk-producing mammary glands for nourishing the young, in the females!

  10. Antenna Hookup by Lokni · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to hook an external antenna up to a desktop WiFI card for increased range?

    1. Re:Antenna Hookup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hasn't this question been asked about 400 times? yes, it's possible. get a mac, the Airport card has an antenna jack.

    2. Re:Antenna Hookup by yack0 · · Score: 1

      There are many many many ways to hook up antennae to SOME network cards. Some wireless cards do not have the ability to do it easily.

      Check out a search for 'wireless antenna' or '802.11b antenna'.

      --
      -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
    3. Re:Antenna Hookup by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

      If there is, you can be sure my school computer tech won't be seen around much anymore, seeing as his house is a stone's throw from his workplace, which sports a gigabit fiber optic connection..

      The thing is he's actually been planning this for a while.

    4. Re:Antenna Hookup by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      Yep - really easy too - they all should have a n type port on the back that the antenna plugs in to.

      I use a decent $67 8db omnidirectional at my base station, although, if you need longer range you might want to look at this $109 24 db directional.

      Remember, you can increase the range by putting an antenna at both the base station, and the remote station. You might want to consider using an omnidirectional at the base, and a directional at the remote if you really need to push the limits.

    5. Re:Antenna Hookup by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 1

      Primestar dishes work with 802.11b just fine, and can be had for the hauling. I recommend getting a hold of as many as your spouse/fiance(e)/roommate will allow ;-).

      --
      A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
  11. Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by knodi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When did it jump? I think I know, but everyone agrees it's happened already.

    As soon as I saw the episode where Marge is
    kidnapped by a biker gang, I said "This is so
    incredibly forced and predictable. They're not
    trying any more. I bet this show ends soon."
    I got 2 out of 3.

    --
    Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    1. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, I think the whole Skinner/Armin Tamzarian thing was the turning point.

    2. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, the Simpson's has years of great stories left. Why, the first example on the recent clipshow showed Homer jumping a shark. That's gotta be funny. Also, I don't recall hearing "The Simpsons are going to Antarctica!" yet. We haven't seen Homer quit his job and move to Connecticut to raise chickens, or better yet, move to California. We haven't seen Marge open up cute gift shop and have George Clooney as her handyman. Also, we haven't seen the cute little kid join the cast, the lame spin-offs, or 37 timeslot changes over 6 months.

      Don't write the show off yet.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by bje2 · · Score: 2

      After last season, i thought for sure that Simpsons was gonna be cancelled...heck, i was calling for it myself...most of the shows last season (like the one with the elf-jockeys) made little or no sense, and even had some self depricating humor that suggested that the series had out lived it's usefulness...however, i think this year's season has be a strong comeback for Homer and the Simpson clan...sure, it's not their glory years, but it's still a damn entertaining show....

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by BenD963 · · Score: 0

      It has not jumped the shark.

      Writers can have bad episodes and even a bad year, and it doesnt mean that they are finished. Two bad years of programing are being made up because this year is substantially better than the previous two years.

    5. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Slarty · · Score: 1

      I totally agree... true, The Simpsons has gone downhill over the past few years, it's still way more entertaining than most of the other stuff on TV these days.

      --
      Hi... I'm Larry... the shivering chipmunk... brrrrr!... I'm cold... I need a sweater...
    6. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the season that King of the Hill premiered. Every Sunday my friends and I would lament that King of the Hill was once again better than the Simpsons (despite the fact that the first few episodes were shaky). Stopped watching the new episodes a couple years back, in favor of the Sopranos.

    7. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Remik · · Score: 1

      It jumped the shark two weeks ago, click the link in the sig for proof.

    8. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...my friends and I would lament that King of the Hill was once again better than the Simpsons
      WHAT! King of the Hill is a messy car wreck of a show. The only reason that it does well was because it came before the Simpsons and used to come after Futurama which meant that I had to bear through that un-funny piece of white trash. Futurama deserved the spot that King of the Hill had, or hell they could move Family Guy to that spot or bring back The Critic. Any of these would be better choices than that pile of rotting red-neck carcasses.
    9. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by meteu · · Score: 1

      You're right, everyone clearly agrees.

    10. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by rkent · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since the simpsons is one of my hobbies and I spend lots of time talking about it (or spewing quotes) with my buddies at the bar, I'd like to offer my rebuttal to the argument that "The Simpsons jumped the shark long ago."

      The important concept is to look at the Simpsons in phases. The Tracy Ulman shorts and season 1, and to a lesser extent season 2, was basically Groening getting his feet wet in the television medium. The plots were decent, and by the end of 2, the characters were pretty damn fleshed out. But most of the time the progress was slow, the voices (especially Azaria's) were crappy, and the jokes didn't punch.

      Seasons 3 through 6,7, or 8 (depending on how much of a hardass you are) were the good years. The characters hit their prime, all the voices solidified, the animation went from "crappy" to "simple but elegant." The plots were tight, the jokes zinged. Basically every really classic episode was from this period. Flaming Moe's, Homer the Heretic, Last Temptation, Lemon of Troy... there are too many to mention.

      But the seeds of crappery were also sewed during this period. Not 1 but 2 clipshows, the spinoff showcase, and guest episodes like the johny cash and X-files episodes. I bring up those last 2 for a reason: one of the central complaints about the later seasons is all the random guest voices, but those 2 above are two of my all time FAVORITES. Which brings me, I guess, to my central point: one man's meat is another's poison. Yes, the X-files episode was a pastiche attempt to gain ratings, but it was done in a freakin' hilarious way.

      Most of the seasons after 9 typify this later approach: garish, sometimes slapdash, and always ridiculous ratings-fodder. Bart's a Jockey! Britney spears reads 2 lines! "It's N-Synch!" I would basically agree that the show had said everything meaningful it was going to say by the end of season 8 or so. And so it turned its energies outward: the long-loved and well-developed characters took on archtypal roles in critiques of pop culture.

      Homer devolved from a dumb but lovable working class chump, to an archie bunker/fred flintstone obnoxious bastard. Lisa went from vulnerable geek to elitist snob. The thing is, these changes had a point: it's the way everyone ELSE was being, and now we're commenting on that, see? In fact, I would argue that the original Homer was a counterpoint to optimistic fans of "reaganomics" in the 80s, and the later Lisa similarly responded to the 90s' rising tide of "tree-hugging liberals" aloof from traditional democratic issues. The characters simply tracked what was going on in life and responded as necessary.

      The Simpsons always had a healthy dose of biting critique, but in the end it had nothing but that. Even if it took the form of doing a totally asinine show and saying, "but you're still watching, eh?" Like the poochy episode or this most recent clip show. Basically, I commend the show for having the audacity, over the last few years, to flaunt and mock its own devolution. The fact that even this "smart" show is ultimately all about profit, and transitively, so must the rest of TV be. Not that we didn't know that, but... we're still watching, right? Granted, it's a different point than they started off trying to make in 1990, but their original idea got done to death. So they moved on. Let's, too.

    11. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Rareul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Clearly the Poochie episode (wherein Homer
      becomes the voice of a new, ridiculous character
      in the Itchy and Scratchy Show) falls
      into your criteria, no?

      sp?

    12. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got you beat. I decided it jumped the shark the second they got off the Tracey Ullmann show.

    13. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Gulthek · · Score: 2

      Everyone? I see at the tabulation page on jumptheshark.com that 1,345 users voted that it never jumped (many adding in the comments: Never jumped, never will), the next closest category has 96 votes.

      Furthermore: It's a moment. A defining moment when you know that your favorite television program has reached its peak. That instant that you know from now on...it's all downhill. Some call it the climax. We call it jumping the shark. - from Jump the Shark.com.

      Ok, what is so difficult about this? Jumping the Shark is not, "when the show is clearly bad." JTS is that moment that stands as the pinnacle of the show such that all following episodes are lesser in comparison. Now, the Simpsons may get really bad but it's probably that it will never Jump the Shark because it has (so far) always hit on moments of genius even in this last season.

      But if it did Jump the Shark, it's definitely already happened and my favorite contender is the first episode of "Who Shot Mister Burns?".

    14. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      connecticut rulez

    15. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Roy. Although they were both of course an intentional meta-commentary, so I don't know if they count.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    16. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the Simpsons to finally make it to Earth, only to find out that the planet's about to be invaded by Cylons and they're the only ones with the technology to stop the attack. And that darned little robotic dog is so cute!

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    17. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by WickywiK · · Score: 1

      How about the Simpsons roughing it out in wild Montanna in "Frontier House" fashion? Or how about a "Survivor" episode. They are both ripe for satire.

    18. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by TheAJofOZ · · Score: 1, Redundant
      No offense intended here, but you have way too much time on your hands....

      That said, you are right.

    19. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by Permission+Denied · · Score: 1

      Just curious, did you write this ahead of time, or did you actually type this into the little textarea on the submission form? I ask because this has all the parts of a good essay.

    20. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by colmore · · Score: 2

      Meta-commentary should be a new JTS category.

      Seriously, once a show has nothing better to talk about than itself, it's over. And a whooooole lot of the Simpsons has been about the Simpsons lately.

      THere might be a few good episodes left, but they'll never do another Mojo/Kid's News.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    21. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by linuxelf · · Score: 1

      When did it jump? When Futurama started. It seems like as soon as they started making Futurama, Matt put all his time into that show (which admitedly is great) and turned away from The Simpsons. The writing seems much more like the writing of The Family Guy than Simpsons. I wouldn't be suprised to hear that they hired some of The Family Guy's writers.

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
    22. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by rkent · · Score: 1

      Just curious, did you write this ahead of time, or did you actually type this into the little textarea on the submission form? I ask because this has all the parts of a good essay.

      Thanks :) I actually typed it up on the spot, but as I said, it's culled from conversations I've been having with other simpsons freaks for months. I am a freelance journalist, though, so I might look into brushing it up and getting it published somewhere.

    23. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by karmawarrior · · Score: 2

      Ted McGinley hasn't joined the cast yet, so it should be ok for another few years...

      (Actually, IIRC Ted McG actually "unsharked" Married with Children. Though, technically, it still furfills the criteria in that it jumped the shark a second time while he was still in the show.)

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
    24. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by jhines · · Score: 2

      The X-files episode was great fun made of big show. I expect the Simpsons to take a poke at any other show out there that has a run like the X-files did. That the stars of the show were willing participate is just great.

      That is one of the reasons it can keep going, as there will always be new material to satire.

    25. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      Love the sig!!

      For those who's minds don't work the same way as mine, think of Bender's favourite saying.

    26. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      "Kiss my shiny metal daffodil?"

      Doesn't fit.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    27. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Even that would be OK as long as there isn't a motorcycle that can fly with lunch-tray wings...

      ...and Bart and Lisa aren't replaced by Lester and Eliza because Nancy and Yeardley quit.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    28. Re:Simpsons jumped the shark long ago by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      P-R-A-Y F-O-R M-O-J-O

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  12. Who or what is Microsoft??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never heard of 'em.

    1. Re:Who or what is Microsoft??? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Who or what is Microsoft???
      Never heard of 'em.

      Don't laugh, I do tech support and occasionally get that. . . . .

      Mostly from people who refuse to watch TV (too industry biased) refuse to read the newspapers (too industry biased) and do not like computers (heard of the internet, never been on it).

      No these are not some Neanderthals, but rather your average every day folks who just don't turn on the tube or pay out of their ass for a newspaper that they would likely throw in the trash any ways. They hold regular jobs and are perfectly ordinary folks, they just don't know, or give much of a fuck, a to what is going on in the high tech sector.

      I have also met people who during the height of the Clinton scandals hadn't heard of it (John Stewart made some jokes about people like that, I have actually dealt with them, heh. Not like they are hard to deal with, just a bit odd not being able to talk about recent events or such)

      Hell we occasionally manage to fight in a war, err, oops I mean "conflict" that I manage to not hear about (though granted those are mostly the 2 or 3 week targeting sessions that most people do not even find worthy of dining room conversation)

  13. "Financial Times of London" by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hmm, you mean like the "Wall Street Journal of New York"?

    I'm not aware of any other Financial Times publications. Certainly not with the distinction and eminence of the one that everyone knows. The Financial Times is published and printed throughout the world, as is the Wall Street Journal.

    If articles like this continue to treat their readers as inward-looking morons, that's probably what they'll become.

    1. Re:"Financial Times of London" by BenD963 · · Score: 0

      slashdot also said "Apple drops Mac OS 9." Have you ever heard of another OS 9, did you need the Mac in front of that?

    2. Re:"Financial Times of London" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean besides OS-9 for the TRS-80 Color Computer and embedded 6809 systems?

    3. Re:"Financial Times of London" by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they got confused.

      It is my understanding that "The Times"
      refers to the Times of London.
      The "New York Times" is different from "The Times".

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    4. Re:"Financial Times of London" by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      It is my understanding that "The Times"
      refers to the Times of London.
      The "New York Times" is different from "The Times".

      Depends on your background and context. As a born-and-bred New Yorker, I will always think of the New York Times when hearing "The Times". Logically enough, someone from the UK would be probably think of the "The Times of London". I don't think there's a "right" way, anymore than there's a "right" assumed area code for a phone number like xxx-1212.
    5. Re:"Financial Times of London" by BenD963 · · Score: 0

      And once again, the abundance of random knowledge is shown at /.

      I stand corrected.

    6. Re:"Financial Times of London" by rkent · · Score: 2

      No, boner, like The Financial Times (of London), or (from London). A clarification for the "inward-looking morons" who aren't familiar with every financial periodical in the Western world. Ease up.

    7. Re:"Financial Times of London" by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1
      Well thats kinda the point. Slashdot wouldn't append (of New York) or (from New York) to the Wall Street Journal because:
      • Its obvious to the people that care
      • The people that don't care, err, don't care
      • Its irrelevant where it hails from as its an international publication
    8. Re:"Financial Times of London" by gowen · · Score: 1
      Logically enough, someone from the UK would be probably think of the "The Times of London".
      Except there is no such thing as "The Times Of London." Its called "The Times", and as a native New Yorker, its older than your country.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    9. Re:"Financial Times of London" by gorilla · · Score: 2

      The difference is that the legal name of "The New York Times" includes the location, while the legal name of the "The Times", which happens to be published in London, is just "The Times". This is reflected in their mastheads, website names, and copyright statements.

  14. Bart on the Chalkboard... by Vrallis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Matt made the message clear in more than just an interview. The last new episode that aired, in the opening scene where Bart is writing on the chalkboard, Bart was writing something along the lines of "A will never lie about being canceled again..."

    Gotta love finding out like that!

    Now, that said,

    I WANT MY GOD DAMNED FUTURAMA BACK YOU BASTARDS!!!

  15. Re:Shitting Bricks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's fucking awesome. Keep up the good work.

  16. Sure, just watch out for lightning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lightning always seems to strike antennas. It should work but if your guitar amp starts sounding like a modem you should probably turn your wattage down before the FCC gets you.

  17. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by rcs1000 · · Score: 2

    Wal-Mart is well known for their globalization tactics

    ... excuse me???

    Their globalisation tactics? Errr... like selling to people?

    Or maybe you mean allowing people to buy - say - mangos, or bananas?

    There are many reasons not to buy from Wal-Mart. But 'their globalisation tactics', whatever they may be - and they seem hardly different from anyone that either sells into different countries, or sells to different countries - hardly seems one of them.

    *r

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
  18. Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice trolling, now write something legible.

  19. Maybe those kids need jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you propose to do with them if you take away their jobs? Those countrys are going through the "sweatshop phase" just like all the other first-world countries did. Oh, I know, give them AK-47's and teach them how the mean of production should be operated by the state? You asswipe...

  20. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by ghack · · Score: 1

    Of course they are!

    Like EVERY OTHER GOD-DAMN RETAILER!

    What, did you just WAKE UP?

    Is this a joke??? (It isnt very funny)

    What is wrong with globalization?

  21. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by 55GallonsOfGoatGoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.

    Is it? I can't seem to find any references to this well known fact using Google. Perhaps you should cite references for the benefit of the unwashed, uninformed masses.

  22. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by singularity · · Score: 2

    The better reason to avoid Wal-Mart is the same reason to avoid Microsoft - both are very guilty of monopolistic abuses (MS has been found guilty, Wal-Mart is just as bad but has not been investigated).

    Go into any small town in the American South. Look at the amount of competition both before and after Wal-Mart moved in. Look at what Wal-Mart does to their old buildings after they move into a "Super Wal-Mart" (sometimes less than 1/2 mile away).

    Wal-Mart drives all of the smaller competitors out of business. Now they are driving K-Mart out. They refuse to lease their old buildings, preferring to leave them empty.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  23. Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    globalization...third world labor

    Gosh break out the moral dilemna rags!

    Good grief. Globalization itself is not evil, no more than capitalism or socialism is evil.

    And what the heck is wrong with employing third world labor? You mean they should go without jobs?

    Hey buddy, my truck was built in Indiana and North Carolina by a Japanese company. Should I refuse to buy any truck not built within 50 miles of where I live, and not built by locals?

    Get a grip. Nothing is local any more. Any Wal Mart driving out inefficient mom-and-pop stores, well, too bad, but that's how progress works. The downside is the newly unemployed have to find a new job. The upside is costs drop, and society finds other uses for previously inefficient workers. They have been fred upt o do something NEW. Got a problem with that?

    Yeh, let's all go back so damn far that everyone is employed locally, say, all the way back to when everyone had their own garden, made their own clothes, and so on.

    I personally dislike Wal-Mart for their extreme penny puinching attitude, I always feel like they are squeezing the last penny out of every thing, and like I should go shower after leaving the place. I don't shop there much. But they have done a hell of a lot of good in keeping prices low for the great unwashed majority. I say Go Wal-Mart!

    1. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      To say walmart sells to the lower income is wrong. They have the buying power to sell at a lowerprice. This is the same way costco or sams club has been doing business for years.

      Of course, lower price means increased business, and that means longer lines.

      Reminds of AOL, sell unlimited for cheap, everyone joins, busy signals. But the high priced ISPs had the best connections and never a busy signal.

    2. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by awol · · Score: 1

      the problem is that the globalisation did not go far enough. Bretton woods was designed to create an environment where the natural efficiencies of different regions should prosper. But unfortunately many governements lacked the courage to acknowledge (perhaps for good reason perhaps not) that, for example, not every country needed a car industry or that grain producers in Europe should be able to compete with farms the size of switzerland in Australia. So barriers to trade were created and capital did not flow to the third world to precisey exploit the beefits that their cheaper labour bring. Expanding yhe use of cheap labour in the thord world is the most efficient way of raising the costs of that labour to the extent that it is comparable with local insudtry. The fact that tariffs still exist impede this natural flow and create the inefficiencies that lead to the continuing mis match of labour price.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    3. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by qurob · · Score: 1

      Farming work out to 3rd world countries takes jobs away from our people..

    4. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get a grip. Nothing is local any more. Any Wal Mart driving out inefficient mom-and-pop stores, well, too bad, but that's how progress works. The downside is the newly unemployed have to find a new job. The upside is costs drop, and society finds other uses for previously inefficient workers. They have been fred upt o do something NEW. Got a problem with that?
      Ah, you follow the party line so well, you could write for one of the Objectivist web sites. "Efficiency", a word used by Stalinists and Capitalists alike, in both cases to mean, "effectively increasing the power of the already powerful".

      Yeah, big fat monopolies mean lower quality and higher cost.. long live Microsoft, British Telecom, et al.

      Thank you for your patronage. Please take a complimentary signed copy of The Virtue of Selfishness.

    5. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by jcast · · Score: 1

      I don't *care* if your people can't compete in the global market. Really, I don't.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    6. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      So barriers to trade were created and capital did not flow to the third world to precisey exploit the beefits that their cheaper labour bring

      Well, to be fair, many trade barriers were in effect before Bretton Woods. It's more the case of an old system being allowed to persist, than some new nefarious one being constructed.


      Globailization is neither good nor evil. A lot of the practices of global corporations are evil, as well as short-sighted and fundamentally flawed.

    7. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get +1 posting privledges, with a drivel-based thought process like that??

      The only thing I can guess is maybe the Slashbots worship your low 4 digit ID or something...

    8. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a life anon-coward.

    9. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      The upside is costs drop, and society finds other uses for previously inefficient workers.

      It's not that local businesses employee inefficient workers, it's just that they don't have the buying power or the money reserves to offer prices like Walmart.

      The latest Walmart controversy (as heard on NPR): they're running supermarkets in their stores and employing non-union butchers.

      Supposedly Walmart treats their employees like crap. Maybe you and I don't have to worry about getting a job as a cashier, but that's no reason to applaud paying people next to nothing just so you can get a better deal on paper towels.

      Which is better for the economy, a bunch of people in each city making good money selling goods at local stores, or a couple of guys in Texas making good money running a chain?

    10. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
      Get a grip. Nothing is local any more. Any Wal Mart driving out inefficient mom-and-pop stores, well, too bad, but that's how progress works. The downside is the newly unemployed have to find a new job. The upside is costs drop, and society finds other uses for previously inefficient workers. They have been fred upt o do something NEW. Got a problem with that?
      Yeah, I got a problem with that. That isn't progress. Progress is when the newly unemployed don't need to find a new job. When wealth & privelege quits grabbing and hoarding and enslaving. Technology is sufficiently advanced that none of us need ever work another day in our lives. So why do we still have to suffer through the daily grind? Simple: Filthy Capitalist Greed.
    11. Re:Oooohhhh...nasty nasty! by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read somewhere that Walmart's tactics are rather brutal. They come into an area and then undersell all the local mom and pop stores. That doesn't sound too bad, until you see that they are leveraging thier deep corpate pockets to do it. They undersell until the local shops have all folded, then jack the price up on thier stuff until the price is higher than it was at the mom and pop shops. The only reason Walmart is able to do this is because they have deep pockets and can undersell for longer than the small guys can. So, it's not that the mom and pops were ineffiecient, just that Walmart was able to kill them.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  24. Distinction between single person and a couple. by ahaning · · Score: 1

    If this exceeds $400 (or $800 for a couple travelling together)

    Why the distinction for couples? Couldn't they just say $400/person?

    I mean, isn't it obvious that, if it's $400 for one person, it will be $800 for a couple?

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    1. Re:Distinction between single person and a couple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means if you are married and travelling with your spouse, you can have $800 for yourself if she/he bought nothing.

    2. Re:Distinction between single person and a couple. by WeThree · · Score: 1

      Its a combined limit versus two seperate limits. This isn't complicated.

      If it was $400/person, marge and homer go shopping in Tokyo, and they have to try to evenly split their purchases between each other (especially if dealing with credit cards) to get the most from their $400 limits.

      If its $800/couple, then marge and homer can spend without worrying about who the purchases are associated with, as their limits are combined.

      --
      --------------------------------
      Not all who wander, are lost.
    3. Re:Distinction between single person and a couple. by Dr.+Kinbote · · Score: 1

      Obviously not the same. Think of the case
      of A importing goods for $600, B for $200.
      If A and B are married, A is not charged
      $20.

    4. Re:Distinction between single person and a couple. by distributed.karma · · Score: 1
      > Why the distinction for couples? Couldn't they just say $400/person?

      No, because here in /. we use a completely different mathematics where, for instance, 50 + 2 - 2 = 48. If someone says 2*400 = 800 it might work, but it's in a different algebra so must be clearly defined.

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

    5. Re:Distinction between single person and a couple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those kind of rules date back to when women were property, and their "rights" were exercised by their husbands.
      Nowadays it's just a slap in the face to anyone who isn't a straight monogamous xtian who believes the government has authority to declare which relationships really exist.

    6. Re:Distinction between single person and a couple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government has no damned business defining my straight monogamous relationship.

      That's what our cultural traditions are for.

  25. Wal-mart, umm ok.. by Squarewav · · Score: 1

    Before everyone jumps for joy over a window-less pc from wal-mart think about this who would buy a pc from wal-mart, I realy dought that anyone who buys PCs from wal-mart is going to install linux, I would immagin that wal-mart hopes that people who buy these PCs will most likly be surprised when they try to boot up and see an error messege insted of a WindowsXP welcome screen, and I would think there first response would be for them to call tech support and hear that they need to purchase " Windows XP Home ed." from there local wal-mart for 200$. Nothing like saving 50$ on a computer to be charged 200$ on an OS

    1. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by NineNine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, although you're just barely literate, I agree. People who shop at Wal-Mart are gonna be, well, like you. Barely literate cretins who buy computers for porn and games. I don't think that most Linux kids could even stand the lights in Wal-Mart long enough to buy a computer.

    2. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by PoiBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm thinking about buying one of these PC's from Walmart, and I'm a very experienced Linux user. They are attractively priced for my needs, and I feel safer dealing with a large company rather than a mom-and-pop computer store with 3 employees.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly. If I go buy a box at Wal-mart, and it doesn't work, I take it back, they give me a refund or replacement.

      I take it back to certain (And I say certain, there are, amazingly a few good mom and pop operations out there), local vendors.. Well, I've seen friends get accused of doing all sorts of nasty things to boxes that they simply pulled out of the packaging.

      And, while I wouldn't expect the average Wal-mart sales rep to know much about computers, I consider that much better than those who know how to change their background, and thus, are obviously computing g0dZ. (These types are often found at local vendors, and also at Circuit City.)

      You know who's going to install Linux on a wal-mart PC? The current day Windows user, who sure as hell isn't going to ruin his or her $2k uber box with some OS that they're not familiar with.

      (Plus, I'd imagine several Slashdot trolls will pool their resources and create a Beowulf cluster, the sole purpose of which will be to unleash a fury of trolling the likes of which has never been seen!)

    4. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how many lives Wal-Mart ruins, both un(der)paid foreign laborers and displaced "mom-n-pop" shops?

    5. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by nmos · · Score: 1

      Err.. isn't this deal just with the Wal-mart on line? If so then taking it back might be more trouble than you think.

    6. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by nmos · · Score: 1

      Well, even us geeks sometimes get sick of building yet another cheap box for friends/relatives/customers just because all the major OEM machines suck rocks.

    7. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must....not..take...bait

    8. Re:Wal-mart, umm ok.. by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      We thought very strongly about buying one of these for our low end web server. The article on installing Linux on one of these was not yet out. Could not be sure about the video. and did not know if we could yank the modem or if it was part of the motherboard.

      I have built a couple of PC's from scratch before, but I do not like that moment when you first power up the motherboard and find out if you got all of the voltage jumpers right.

      My wife can install Linux on a box (even edited a book on the subject). But she would not think about putting a machine together from the ground up.

      Compusa will put a PC together for you, but the one I priced out was going to be more expensive than the prebuilt ones in the stores.

      We went with Fry's instead because we could do it without delay and hassel. (then spent an evening trying to figure out what was causing the random reboots, [mtbf 15 min] looks like the motherboard bios allows memory settings faster than it truely supports (but I could be wrong))

  26. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Globalization is bad, mmm'kay. Companies = Evil. If it weren't for companies moving into third world countries, there wouldn't be any sweatshop jobs and thus everything would be better without those jobs, mm'kay. In fact, there would be no jobs period, but never mind that for a moment.

  27. It has to be said! by Japanese+Fuckslut · · Score: 0

    The actual text of what he said wasn't even very specific, and more or less reiterated what everyone else already knows: The Simpsons has had a long and successful run, but it's winding down to the last few seasons. It's not a news magazine, sports showcase, or other kind of program that is constantly fed with new material. The show has limitations, and it's already explored just about every comedic nuance of its characters.

    It will of course be sad when it finally leaves the air, but the show is 13 seasons old. It's not going to go on forever!

    --

    Two cock in my pussy! It feel so good!
    1. Re:It has to be said! by lewp · · Score: 1

      It will of course be sad when it finally leaves the air, but the show is 13 seasons old. It's not going to go on forever!

      But why? :(

      --
      Game... blouses.
  28. Mixed Feelings by (void*) · · Score: 2
    I don't know, but I have very mixed feelings about Harlan Ellison suing AOL. He is the writer of his works, and his wishes should be respected. Unfortunately, going after AOL for usenet postings is like hitting out at the poor geek in the corner when one gets bullied.


    I wish Mr Ellison would just realize the futility and injustice of doing what he is doing and fight his fine cause elsewhere.

    1. Re:Mixed Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has yet answered this question for me: Harlan Ellison is, as all published writers are and always have been, paid by a publisher for a fixed number of copies of his work. When people make more copies (rather than re-sell or give away the original), it's illegal, in any medium, becuase the copier has the opportunity to sell copies for which the author does not get paid. Can someone please tell me why that's unjust? Can all the people who have been copying Ellison's work and uploading it please prove they haven't been selling their copies?

    2. Re:Mixed Feelings by cachorro · · Score: 1
      Can all the people who have been copying Ellison's work and uploading it please prove they haven't been selling their copies?


      Who would they collect from? Once digital and posted, always free (as in stars). But then if you want to send me $5 for this comment, I won't complain.


      The Kid

    3. Re:Mixed Feelings by (void*) · · Score: 2
      >Can someone please tell me why that's unjust?


      Because when the copier sells the copies, he is making money without compensating the writer. This is copyright law. COPYRIGHT LAW IS ABOUT CONTROL, not profits. It is presumed that control over the distribution would allow the writer to determine how much profit he makes. But the writer's motivations need not be profit - don't assume this is so. (For example, what if the author feels the work is unfinished and is embarrased about it?)


      And along comes the internet and destroys the idea that writers have control over who distributes or does not distribute his works. So even if the guys
      who distribute it pay up, you have undermined this simple right of the author.


      So the choice is clear - we as a society seem to value interconnectivity and convenience, and all that it implies, more than respect for each other.

    4. Re:Mixed Feelings by CaseyB · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Unfortunately, going after AOL for usenet postings is like hitting out at the poor geek in the corner when one gets bullied.

      That's nothing. Last year he was ranting about how it should be illegal to write software like gnutella. Not "use for illegal purposes". Write.

      I think Ellison is gradually transitioning from his traditional role as the "outspoken grumpy curmudgeon" of the SF world, to being the "crazy homeless man shouting at the parking meter" of the SF world.

    5. Re:Mixed Feelings by schon · · Score: 1

      COPYRIGHT LAW IS ABOUT CONTROL

      First off IANAL, and I suspect YANAL either.. so let's ask someone who IS a lawyer -

      Hmm, according to Lawrence Lessig, who is not only a lawyer, but a copyright lawyer, copyright "protects copyright owners from unfair competition. It has never been a way to give copyright holders perfect control"

      So I'd guess you're wrong when you say that copyright is about control. Unfair competition is about profits.

  29. Re:Greater source of hot air:Bob Metcalfe ot Ellis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not the articles not about Larry Ellison, it's about Harlan Ellison.

  30. 'Behind The Laughter' by wackybrit · · Score: 2

    The Simpsons jumped the shark in the season that ended with the Behind The Laughter episode.. Season 12, I think? The characters have been rather 'off' since then.. and 'Behind The Laughter' was worst episode ever anyway.. so it's a good point to mark.

    1. Re:'Behind The Laughter' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved the behind the laughter episode!

    2. Re:'Behind The Laughter' by Remik · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Ever since I've been trying to get my hands on a bottle of gin shaped like Homer.

    3. Re:'Behind The Laughter' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It was the end for the Simpsons."

      "After the break - was it really the end for the Simpsons? Yes it was. Or was it?
      And Homer finds a new calling - cleaning sound studio mixing equipment."

  31. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.

    Of course they are! You ever been in a bunny suit? No matter how cold the room is--you sweat, period. The human body just gets hot when surrounded on all sides by millimeter-thick plastic.

    Even so, I hope this post was a joke. I saw it was modded funny...

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
  32. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia." Uhh... I don't think you can make processors in sweatshops. That doesn't even make sense.

  33. Re:Slashdot sucks horse balls by ironfroggy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    such inter-OSDN bickering... *sigh*

  34. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by weis · · Score: 1

    That sigline is just too classic! And from the tone of the message, it couldn't be a joke. Evidently, Mensa doesn't test spelling....

    --
    With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. --RFC 1925
  35. That $500 prize by Syre · · Score: 2

    SETI@home changed the prize to a T-shirt shortly after the /. article.

    So no one won the $500 prize...

    1. Re:That $500 prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems that the ./ effect cost them $485

    2. Re:That $500 prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not entirely correct. The prize was always a T-shirt. the $500 was offered by the wichita state university team

      One tip: next time read all the words on the page before posting

    3. Re:That $500 prize by Captain+Chad · · Score: 1
      This is from the 'news' section of the main seti@home page, as of May 7th, 2002:
      1. "The Wichita State University team has offered a $500 prize to whoever returns the 500 millionth result!"
      So the cash prize still exists, although the seti@home folks are not the ones providing it.
      --
      Check out Chad's News
  36. Revoke this MENSA membership... by bje2 · · Score: 2

    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.
    - i have never read anything about AMD making their processors in sweatshops...do you have any information to back that up? even if they are, does that mean we should stay away from all stores that sell AMD processors...jeez, i dunno where i'm gonna shop for electronics anymore...

    A large portion of Wal-Mart's merchandise is produced in third-world countries under sweatshop conditions
    - i dunno about your Wal-Mart, but in my Wal-Mart they sell tons of brand name merchandise...the same brand name merchandise that you can find in any mall, toy store, electronics store, etc...if you have a problem with the business practices of a particular brand of merchandise (e.g. Nike), then i suggest you protest their company in particular, rather then make a dangerous blanket statement like you did...

    -if you were gonna slam Wal-Mart for anything, you could've slammed them from not hiring union workers (atleast i don't think they still do)...that would be a legitimate complaint (although, i don't have a problem with it)...that is one of the ways they keep their prices down, in fact...but instead, you came in with unsubstantiated claims about AMD, and a bunch of "evil" talk about Wal-Mart...nice try...

    here's a link to the MENSA comment form, i think we should send them a copy of your post, and protest your membership...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Revoke this MENSA membership... by snorb · · Score: 1

      it is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.
      - i have never read anything about AMD making their processors in sweatshops...do you have any information to back that up?

      Probably referring to this shocking exposé.
    2. Re:Revoke this MENSA membership... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mensa refuses to have an official opinion on anything, so he can say pretty much what he wants as long as he doesn't claim to speak for Mensa.

      And yes, unfortunately we get jerks even in Mensa.

  37. Who is Harlan Ellison? by Papineau · · Score: 3

    Can somebody enlighten me?
    What is his copyrighted work for which he sued AOL?

    1. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by wiredog · · Score: 2

      Longtime SF writer. His most famous story is probably "Repent Harlequin, Said the Ticktockman", and he wrote the ST:TOS episode "City on the Edge of Forever".

    2. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harlan Ellison is a science fiction writer, mostly specializing in short stories, hence he's not very well known any more to people who mostly buy books off the rack. There are a few collections around.

      On the other hand, Mr. Ellison is usually mad about something or other. He's known for highly
      emotional stories, and seems to have a very
      thin skin.

    3. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Quarters · · Score: 2

      He's also good friends with J. Michael Strazinski and was a writing consultant on all Babylon 5 episodes and TV movies.

    4. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by JordanH · · Score: 1
      • His most famous story is probably "Repent Harlequin, Said the Ticktockman"...

      A good story, no doubt, but I think his most famous has to be I Have No Mouth, And I Must Scream.

      I may be wrong...

    5. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasonably talented writer, started off as a fanboy haunting conventions trying to impress the likes of Asimov et al. Went on to some success with the "new wave" science fiction crowd in the late 60's/early 70's. Wrote several award-winning short stories and one Star Trek episode.

      Notoriously short fuse, essentially a prima donna with a vastly overinflated picture of his standing in the science fiction scene. Ended up pretty much avoided by Hollywood or anyone else with a need to collaborate and actually get the job done on deadline and with a minimum of screaming and hissy fits.

      Summary nowadays: irrelevant, a dinosaur.

      Also known to be litigous, hence the AC post.

    6. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by gilroy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Blockquoth the poster:

      he wrote the ST:TOS episode "City on the Edge of Forever".

      Well, strictly speaking, he wrote a script that contained the nucleus of "City...", but had creative differences. The script was extensively reworked into what appeared on film. And despite what Ellison screams, loudly, the script also massively improved once he was no longer part... I had the opportunity to read his script (in a book published, what, five years ago, I think), and it stank. IMHO and YMMV but that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
    7. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      To add to the above comments, apparently he was some kind of a creative consultant on Babylon 5 (heh, amusingly, I'm working my way through the series on Kazaa(lite) right now, so I guess I'm part of the problem).

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    8. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by i0lanthe · · Score: 2

      I'd vote for IHNMAIMS being at least his most famous title... heh heh.

      Had some fun with some friends once sitting around making up fake Ellison story titles and interspersing them with real ones, with people trying to guess which was which. (Not as much fun as doing the same thing with Piers Anthony titles, but it was a less disturbing fun. Gutbucket Quest, forsooth!)

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
    9. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Chasuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He is also notorious for having compiled, edited and released two seminal SF anthologies, Dangerous Visions and Again Dangerous Visions.

      I've been waiting for Last Dangerous Visions for over 25 years, but Harlan has never released it, for reasons that he has never explained.

      Ellison's has insisted for over 25 years that it will be completed, but it remains one of the most famous ever not-published books. Christopher Priest wrote about it amusingly in The Last Deadloss Visions, but, at Christopher's request, that e-text has been withdrawn from the Internet.
      And, no, it wasn't withdrawn due to censorship or Harlan's bullying, but for more commercial reasons: you can now order it in book form from Amazon as The Book on the Edge of Forever : An Enquiry into the Non-Appearance of Harlan Ellison's the Last Dangerous Visions.

      Sadly, I haven't read it for years, so I can't recount the details here.

    10. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wrote a dozen or so extremely good stories, and tons and tons of pretty good stories.

      I think it would be a mistake to try to 'rank' them overly much. I enjoy both stories quite a bit.

    11. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

      I have no clue, and I must scream.

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    12. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Ellison was also involved (with Ben Bova) with the god-awful (and mercifully forgotten by most) series Starlost. Ellison's opinion of the final product was such that he insisted they use the nom de plume that he reserves for travesties of his work, Cordwainer Bird.

      IIRC he also wrote the story "A Boy and His Dog" that was made into a (somewhat silly) movie.

      --
      -- Alastair
    13. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Ben Dova?

    14. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's the guy who worked for Disney for a few hours. Wah wah wah wahhhh. Basically he's the John Romero of SF.

    15. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who is Harlan Ellison?
      A SF writer; a talented asshole. Try not to piss him off if you have to be in his presence for some reason.
    16. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by huginOGmunin · · Score: 1

      A couple of my old friends had the job of bulk erasing studio videotapes from the early 70s. Among the shows they consigned to magnetic oblivion, -- the Starlost --

      So I guess no DVD box set of that one.

    17. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by blair1q · · Score: 2

      >I've been waiting for Last Dangerous Visions for over 25 years, but Harlan has never released it, for reasons that he has never explained.

      Harlan has explained it, and Priest's essay explained Harlan's explanation, but of course Harlan's explanation didn't really explain it in the first place.

      It's been, christ, a decade? since I read Last Deadloss Visions, but the gist of Harlan's excuse was: Harlan procrastinated for a decade or so (and either I forget why or he never explained it), then decided the material wasn't Dangerous any more, and doesn't want to publish it.

      It's an explanation that lacks hydroponic containment when you realize that most of us didn't read the first two books until well after they'd ceased being subversive.

      --Blair
      "Note sardonic minusculation of popular religious icon's name. Just me, trying to get into the book."

    18. Re:Who is Harlan Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd guess his most famous work would be
      "A Boy and his Dog" since they made a
      motion picture out of it. (?)

  38. Is Walmart's PC a sell for Advanced Users? by ejaw5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this product is targeted towards the advanced users out there, as much of the "mainstream" users would at least think twice before buying a PC, then have to install an OS. However, most of the people I know who install and configure their own operating systems (whether windows or linux) tend to want to build their own systems themselves. Personally, I never purchase manufactured computers because I want to make sure I get "top quality" components, such as a versitile/highly configurable motherboard (like asus, i'm not endorsing). Especially when you install Linux, it's good to know exactly the hardware specs, and the easiest way to do that is to put it all together yourself.

    Despite this, I feel Walmart & Microtel are doing a good job at showing that Windows isnt the only way to compute. The Microtel SYSMAR506 - Athlon 1.4 seems a good deal at around $500 for budget consious families who want to expose technology affordably to their children or for geeks who need a computer fast and cheap. It would be nice if they included both Windows and Linux drivers, but i know that 1.) Just the fact that it includes windows drivers is a much better improvement than Compaq's "recovery cd" that doesn't have drivers, and 2.) a lot of hardware is automatically detected under Linux, so it may not be necessary

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Advanced Users? by distributed.karma · · Score: 1
      > I think this product is targeted towards the advanced users out there, as much of the "mainstream" users would at least think twice before buying a PC, then have to install an OS. However, most of the people I know who install and configure their own operating systems (whether windows or linux) tend to want to build their own systems themselves.

      Good point! In fact the OS could be thought of as one component of an entire working PC. So it feels kind of silly to have a pre-assembled kit with just one component left as an exercise for the hobbyist. Especially when he/she has to worry about its compatibility with the other components.

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

    2. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Advanced Users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember also that oftentimes that people want to replace their computer, and damn well know how to do it, but simply lack the funds.

      In all honesty, unless you can afford top of the line components, you're better off getting a pre-made box. You might find a few deals here and there online, but the price you'll pay in shipping tends to nullify those deals.

      The fast and cheap ideal plays a part.. If you have a bad component, you drive back to Wal-mart and get a replacement box. If that chip of ram that you ordered from BotswanaComputing.com is bad, you're fux0red for a few weeks via normal shipping, or fux0red even more with outrageous express shipping rates.

      I still see the 'average' user buying something like this. MS operating systems are not that hard to install, for the most part, you insert the disc, and hit ok every so often. What I'll be surprised by is if Microsoft doesn't try to stop Wal-mart somehow. After all, the average person sees nothing wrong with trading mp3s and videos over "that Morpheus thing". I don't think they'd see anything wrong with taking their old Windows disc and using it on the new computer.

    3. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Advanced Users? by Telemakhos · · Score: 1

      Remember also that oftentimes that people want to replace their computer, and damn well know how to do it, but simply lack the funds.

      Amen, brother. That about sums up the whole deal. Yes, I could buy a Lian Li case, the top of the line SMP quad mobo, four processors, and enough fans to cool a small stadium, but I'd also like to buy a sandwich and a pack of smokes once in a while too.

  39. Nobody reads articles... by n6mod · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...but you knew that.

    If you actually read Ellison's original rant, he sued AOL because the infringing postings were "received as part of his subscription to AOL."

    That's right kids, Ellison was connecting through AOL. The alleged infringer's ISP (Tehama County Online) rolled over immediately, and was thus spared inclusion in the lawsuit. AOL got sued because they carried the infringing bits to him at his request.

    At worst, they failed to proactively remove the posts from their news spools.

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    1. Re:Nobody reads articles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "
      That's right kids, Ellison was connecting through AOL. The alleged infringer's ISP (Tehama County Online) rolled over immediately, and was thus spared inclusion in the lawsuit. AOL got sued because they carried the infringing bits to him at his request.
      "

      By this logic, if a cop asks for crack, gets it, and arrests the dealer, the cop is in the wrong?

    2. Re:Nobody reads articles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that arguement if a cop orders crack by mail he can arrest the mailman ... oh wait no, thats not what you said ... but hey, what you implied he said he didnt say either so I guess thats fair.

    3. Re:Nobody reads articles... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      By this logic, if a cop asks for crack, gets it, and arrests the dealer, the cop is in the wrong?

      I believe that it's called entrapment. It is, or used to be, illegal. By my lights, that is proper. The policeman would be soliciting an illegal act which is itself a crime. Now if it was offered to him...

      Proving things got messy. And courts almost always believe the policeman's version, though I suspect that an impartial witness would say that the policeman was accurate less than half the time. (Some large fraction of the time neither party would be accurate.) To me it seems that if a policeman comits a crime, then he should be liable to twice the penalty that an ordinary citizen would be. But that it should be legal for people to carry recorders and to use them without informing others of what was being done.

      Also that illegally obtained evidence should be useable, but only if the parties that committed the crimes involved in obtaining it (including soliciting the crime) were also prosecuted to the full extent of the law. And convicted. If the evidence was obtained illegally, then the person obtaining it comitted a crime, and should be punished. If he was instructed to do this by someone who is in charge of him, or affects the probability of his being paid, then that person has also comitted a crime. And must be punished before the evidence can be used. etc.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  40. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Saeculorum · · Score: 1

    Welcome to capitalism, my friend.

  41. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by MrResistor · · Score: 5, Informative
    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.

    Actually, it is a well known fact that the Duron is manufactured in AMD's Fab 25 in Austin, Texas. I'm sure the residents of Austin will be suprised to know that they are now citizens of "Maylasia". Or did you perhaps mean Malaysia?

    But hey, smart folks like you have no need for verifiable facts, right? So much for that "no toleranse for stupidity" thing. I guess Mensa'll hand out a card to any retard willing to take their asinine brain teaser test...

    Oh and, by the way, it's spelled "tolerance". You might want to fix that one of these days. But then again, since I already pointed that out to you several months ago, maybe you enjoy looking like an idiot?

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  42. linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When /. discussions, which used to be highly informative, degenerate into namecalling, it's a sure sign that linux is dying.

    1. Re:linux is dying by BenD963 · · Score: 0

      I think it is more a problem of the entire tech/geek community not to be able to have conversations without resorting to childish namecalling.

    2. Re:linux is dying by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Oh no! What does that say about the US government? Followed by, You haven't been reading /. very long, have you?

      And, since I've been roused to post yet again, I suppose I should address everything in this /back that concerns me.

      1. Harlan Ellison has a right to defend his copyrights, but he's an idiot to go after what a powerful ISP that is becoming more and more like a common carrier. Wasn't there a move at one point to make ISPs CCs?

      2. The Simpsons is definitely on the way out. I can't say exactly when it started on the way out... it's rather like the onset of cold weather. At some point, you start wearing a hat but it doesn't usually jump from 90 to 40 all in one day, and there are plenty of 80s mixed in with the 50s. Every once in a while I still get a good belly laugh from the Simpson's, but it's been a while. Last Sunday's Apu affair just sort of sat there. How old are the octuplets? They ought to age them correctly. That would yield a good shot where Maggie meets one and then looks at Marge as if to say "why not me?"... Actually, I've seen lots of suggestions from fans that are better than the real scripts. That's a certain sign the show is dying. Like Saturday Night Live jumped the shark when GE Smith started playing. Even George Foreman smashing Smith's guitar hasn't saved it. I can still think of better scripts than they can, but I can't pinpoint the moment of failure for the Simpons... sorry.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  43. Never been in to Wal-Mart by Com2Kid · · Score: 0, Troll

    Okay actualy I think I like ONCE stepped foot in one 10 or so years ago for maybe half a second, but shit; uh;

    worlds largest corporation?

    Within 5 or 6 miles of me there are 3 Safe-Ways (used to be 4, but two of them consolidated into one building), but I have no idea where in the hell a walmart would be found at (or what the hell they even stock, though from what I read apparently everything).

    I honestly think that there are more K-marts in Seattle (okay actualy there are only three or four) then walmarts.

    Who the hell goes to walmart anyways? Fuck, I don't even KNOW ANYBODY WHO HAS EVER BEEN INSIDE OF A WALMART . How f*cking huge am I supposed to believe that they are?

    1. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your time in blissful ignorance, Wal-Mart is coming. You will be assimilated.

    2. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are dumb

    3. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're out in the sticks, like Renton and maybe Everett.
      "Sam's Club" (there's one on Aurora) is apparently the same company, though.

    4. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by jcast · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never been to the Mid-West (i.e., the rest of the country).

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    5. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      worlds largest corporation?

      From the Forbes Fortune 500 list:

      1. Citigroup
      2. General Electric
      3. Exxonmobil
      4. America Int. Group
      5. Bank of America
      6. Wal-Mart stores

      I'd say that puts them pretty muck as the top retail corp. in the U.S...

      I'd say that a few people do go into these places.... just coz you don't, doesn't mean that others don't...

      (BTW I come from a country where they don't even exist.. so I'm not a fan or a hater of said corporation)

      --
      Burma?
    6. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live, of course. There may be more K-marts in highly populated areas, but if one gets out into smaller towns, the Wal-Marts most certainly have it. I've seen Wal-Marts even in absolutely tiny little towns with a population around 5-7,000 or so (it should be noted that the K-mart in one of those towns folded; I don't recall if it was before or after the Wal-Mart showed up). I'll grant you, however, that once somewhere gets to be around "big city" size, the Wal-Mart presence tends to dry up. Being that they're pretty much ubiquitous elsewhere, however, I can't see that really hurting them so much.

      Wal-mart sells hardware, electronics, clothes, guns... they duplicate keys, change tires -- as long as there's a local demand for these things, it makes sense that they'll be more profitable than (say) K-mart per store, simply because they sell a wider variety of products and services.

      Yes, they're huge. Really.

    7. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      4. America Int. Group

      Who the hell are they, even google turns up jack.

    8. Re:Never been in to Wal-Mart by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      We should be VERY afraid then!! When companies get that big and no-one knows what they do!!

      go to Forbes' web site and look under "Lists" and be afraid!

      --
      Burma?
  44. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    No, the better reason to stay away from both Microsoft and Wal-mart is that they produce crappy product. Urban Wal-marts make even the worst of their K-mart counterparts seem downright pleasant.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  45. Globalization *is* actually evil by matsh · · Score: 2

    Globalization itself is not evil...

    Globalization often means that products are produced in one part of the world and shipped to another part of the world. This requires energy, often through the use of fossil fuels, which when used produce gases that harms the atmosphere.

    This fact is often sadly neglected.

    Mats

    1. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by jcast · · Score: 1

      Bull.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    2. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Yes, instead of piles of inefficient cottage industries making every conceivable consumer good in every location there are a few much more efficient factories and a bulk transportation system to move the goods around. In the end the more efficient (read cheaper) process wins.

      I hate to rain on your parade, but there is almost certainly a net decrease in energy usage due to globalization. The real drawback to globalization is that it creates jobs in developing nations and it allows them to waste money on cheap consumer goods as well. The increased pollution is mostly due to the fact that more people want to live in the 21st century. If we left these folks out of the global economy they probably would be happy with a new homemade spear and a freshly-sharpened wooden plow. Instead, they want a car, a Big Mac, and an XBox.

    3. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      This requires energy, often through the use of fossil fuels, which when used produce gases that harms the atmosphere

      As opposed to posting on slashdot, which is powered by Magic Pixie Dust and hence uses no energy and causes no pollution...
    4. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Globalization often means that products are produced in one part of the world and shipped to another part of the world. This requires energy, often through the use of fossil fuels, which when used produce gases that harms the atmosphere.

      This fact is often sadly neglected.
      >>>>>>>

      Posting anti-globalization rants to /. also requires energy to run the computers... This fact is often neglected, as well, it seems.

    5. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead, they want a car, a Big Mac, and an XBox.

      Yeah, so they can fill the atmosphere with pollutants, rot their brain with prions, and scratch the brand-new DVDs.

    6. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cry me a river. I myself have spent some time living in the Peruvian Andes in a village that didn't have running water or electricity and that relied on human (and to a small extent animal) power for everything, and I wouldn't wish that existence on anyone. Even the worst sweatshops in Lima have better living conditions than those of the typical Andean subsistance farmer. Not too mention the fact that the workers in Lima are far less likely to be harrassed by terrorists, drug-lords, or government soldiers.

      The low end of the technology ladder is a crappy place to be. I don't see you giving up your car, your computer, and all the other trappings of civilized life to go live in the bush. Why should it surprise you that third world folk want to live like you do?

    7. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by geekoid · · Score: 2

      but the point is, Wal-Mart has made conditions worse.
      Shops where peple made 31 cents an hour, now make 13 cents an hour.

      I just want to see the workers treated like human beings. The cost of living is wildly different in 3rd world conutries, I recognize that, but I also recognize that working below the level needed for basic sustenance is wrong.
      I suggest you go to NLC, read there "about NLC" page, then do a search for wal-mart.
      I do not believe globalization in and of itself is evil, but I feel the way its being put forth will allow people to get abused, that is evil.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Globalization *is* actually evil by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Wal-Mart doesn't make conditions worse. Wal-Mart offers the most precious of commodities to members of a third-world nation, a job that pays cold hard cash. I suppose that instead of hiring children you would rather that these children begged for a living? These children are going to be working no matter what happens, they might as well have somewhat decent jobs.

      I have spent enough time in South America to know one thing. The people who work in foreign owned "sweatshops" are regarded as some of the most fortunate in the country. The reason that manufacturers in Peru can get away with paying their workers such a lousy wage is that people are desperate for jobs, and the only way to fix this problem is to increase the number of jobs available. What Peru needs is more foreign investment, not less.

      Chile is a prime example of what can happen to a country that cleans up the local corruption (mostly), and invites foreign investment. As anyone who has visited these two countries recently can tell you there is no comparing their economies.

      Not that I think it is likely that I will convince you that you are wrong. Your attitude is a good example of why it is that Americans are not particularly well-received througout the world. We are happy to send money to Sally Struthers so that the poor can have enough to subsist, but if these poor show signs of trying to become self-reliant we are the first to boycott the goods from their factories.

  46. Scientologists helped us win this one! by Darkforge · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's interesting to note that the most relevant precedent brought to bear on Ellison's case against AOL was a case in which the Scientologists (through the Religious Technology Center, one of their many dummy organizations,) tried to sue Netcom On-Line Communications Services, Inc. for storing their copyrighted religious texts on USENET.

    In that case, the court said this: "The court does not find workable a theory of direct infringement that would hold the entire Internet liable for actions that cannot reasonably be deterred." The worst possible outcome from a Scientologist's perspective.

    Judge Cooper upheld this precedent with her current summary judgement. Way cool.

    Yet again, the Scientologists shoot themselves in the foot!

    --

    When I moderate, I only use "-1, Overrated". That way, I never get meta-moderated!

  47. I live in the American South ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    dividing time between Knoxville (small-big or big-small town, depending how you see things) and Dandridge, which is small no matter how you look at it.

    Walmart has its bad points -- fake congeniality, bland mainstream culture (not) elevated to an artform, some dreariness which cannot be erased, employees who mostly seem far left on the bell curve of indifference.

    However, for many of the thigns that Walmart provides *there was no competition from local merchants* -- at least, not in the way fantasized by some Walmart opponents. 24-hour grocery? Moderate selection of electronics? A music / video / software store? Around here, there were some low-grade groceries and a low-performing Radio Shack, some pawnshops if you wanted to find stereo equipment that wasn't by Realistic or Optimus. Now there's a better Radio Shack --- across from Walmart, which brings enough traffic to support it, evidently.

    I'm not trying to downplay all criticism of Walmart (I agree with some of it, in fact), but a) there's a fantasy world of small-town home-cooked goodness with friendly, cheap pharmacists on every corner who would give you free candy corn and fix your glasses for free while talking sports scores, and there's the reality of depressed, empty downtowns with listless or empty businesses which can't afford to keep open enough hours to be convenient ... YSmalltownMV.
    There's also the larger point that despite any griping which may ensue, people don't generally go to a store and spend their money because they know they could be getting a better bundle of satisfactions elsewhere. Walmart is *not* the best grocery store in driving range, but it's the only one I've stopped in to pick up combinations like bananas and Mandrake. (The distro, not the weird plant.)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  48. I'd buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use linux everyday, been doing it for sometime. Last 2 or 3 computers I've bought have been ~ 1 - 2 year old for $500. I'd buy a new PC if it was cheap. I dont need the latest greated fire breathing computer to suit my needs ... building my own I've found is uaually ne cheaper and takes sometime on my part -- time that I ususlly dont have.

  49. Re:Super Lucky Tasty Kitty by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    cool. Now, I can find out what it's like to eat pussy

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  50. mod down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod down, this is not funny. This person just have "mod"down-syndrome. HAHAHA now that is funny.

  51. That's a XP 1600 not a 1.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry not trying to be an ass. Even though it is running at 1.4GHz, the PR 1600 rating is validated by every benchmark out there. I only which Intel chips came with PR ratings. $498 for an XP1600 with DDR is O.K., I could obviously build it for less, but all in all its a decent price. Definitely better than a Dell Celeron with is what you get in this range.
    Plus your not putting money is M$'s pockets which is a plus.

  52. "Third world" is all about the conditions by yerricde · · Score: 1

    And what the heck is wrong with employing third world labor? You mean they should go without jobs?

    No, I think third world laborers should go without having to work in the disgusting conditions they work in. I think they should go without breathing filthy air. I think they should work ten (not 14) hour days. I think they should get at least their country's minimum wage so that they can begin to take care of their own health.

    I think you should read this story if you haven't already.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:"Third world" is all about the conditions by gilroy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:


      And what the heck is wrong with employing third world labor? You mean they should go without jobs?

      No, I think third world laborers should go without having to work in the disgusting conditions they work in. I think they should go without breathing filthy air. I think they should work ten (not 14) hour days. I think they should get at least their country's minimum wage so that they can begin to take care of their own health.


      Amen to that. Ironically, however, the path to that happy state almost certainly lies in increased involvement in the world economy, and that at first is going to come through Western companies. So it's OK to pressure Wal-Mart, Nike, or whomever, but recognize the irony... Here in the industrial West, we reached more human working conditions through strife and struggle; it's unlikely to happen smoothly anywhere else. The worst thing is, the transnationals seemed to have learned a lot of lessons about stopping the process, but we are not transmitting the right lessons about moving it forward.
    2. Re:"Third world" is all about the conditions by yzf750 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm I think you should work 10 hour days, and send all of your earnings above minimum wage to said countries workers to support them. If you don't, then who are you to bitch about what said workers are willing to work?

  53. RE: Hacking at the ties that bind by gomadtroll · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked the venerable 486 didn't have any PCI slots, it does do mighty fine with isa nic's and Smoothwall/IPCOP though.

  54. The elf jockeys by Kohath · · Score: 2

    The one with Furious D was one of the funniest episodes ever. You're nuts.

    "And what's this? A horse abusing a jockey? Could this be the start of a terrifying Planet of the Horses? In this announcer's opinion, almost certainly yes! And away I go!"

    1. Re:The elf jockeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No; "Worst. Episode. Ever." was exactly that; the worst episode ever.

  55. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Sancho · · Score: 2

    Driving them out of business is capitalism, not anticompetitive practices. Microsoft forces companies to put Windows on every PC they sell or not get the cheap rate; they put hidden instructions in their operating system so that alternative software/os's can't run their software, etc. There is a difference. Has Wal-mart actually done such anticompetitive things?

  56. winmodem FUD by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Sorry but My Compaq EVO and my E500 both have winmodems and they work perfectly with linux, both slackware and redhat 7.2 and 7.3..

    A major type of winmodem chipset is happily supported by linux.. Maybe the one in the walmart computer is a el-cheapo version of a winmodem that isnt supported, I dont know what chipset it is.

    but saying that winmodems are unsupported by linux is pure FUD and has no place on slashdot.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:winmodem FUD by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Funny
      "...is pure FUD and has no place on slashdot."
      Error, does not parse.
    2. Re:winmodem FUD by Rydia · · Score: 1

      "works" and "supported" are two completely different things. without an official and well-tested driver, you can never be really, REALLY sure that the hardware won't just crap out on you.

    3. Re:winmodem FUD by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      a el-cheapo version of a winmodem

      You mean "an el-cheapo version of an el-cheapo version"?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:winmodem FUD by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... pure FUD and has no place on slashdot.

      You must be new here. :)

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    5. Re:winmodem FUD by Webmonger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe some winmodems are supported, but THIS ONE ISN'T. So in this case, the inclusion of this winmodem means that Windows is required to take full advantage of the hardware.

      Read the article. They talk about how some winmodems are supported, but not this one.

      And, like the other people said, I'd rather see an open-source driver.

    6. Re:winmodem FUD by nmos · · Score: 1

      Well, it's nice that yours work but the winmodems in the Walmart computer in question don't. Even when you can get winmodems to work they are still likely to cause you problems later on when you update your kernel or move to a new distro or different OS. A $10 piece of hardware is just not worth the trouble these things eventually cause, even under Windows.

  57. It means there's no double occupancy discount by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I mean, isn't it obvious that, if it's $400 for one person, it will be $800 for a couple?

    It's not as obvious as you might think. In the travel business, there's often a substantial discount on per-person rates for double occupancy, meaning that if it costs $X for one person, it'll cost less than $2*X for a couple.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  58. How can you miss a frickin' Wal-Mart? by supergumby · · Score: 1

    There is a Wal-Mart in the mall closest to me, and it is rather large. However, it took over the retail space vacated by Woolworth if I'm not mistaken.

    If you would like to see the biggest big-box that you have seen in a while, take a trip up the I-5. I can't remember where it is but there's a goddamn huge Wal-Mart on the right side of the highway coming down from Vancouver.

    Wal-Mart sucks ass. I bought an egg beater there and it broke within a week. It was a gift too, so I felt so embarassed that I bought a tweleve dollar egg beater as a replacement.

  59. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I normally dont reply to a sig.. but card carrying Mensa member? Why?? I found mensa members to be overstrokes ego assholes. Granted my Low IQ of 148 should be pissed on, but then I have social skills... something most everyone in the high-iq society horribly lacks..

    Note: I wouldn't be proud to be a member of Mensa.. It's the only group I have found to be more racist than the Clan... but worse... self ritious racists...

    Mensa= card carrying assholes... at least the Michigan chapter.

  60. Um, partially. by Phs2501 · · Score: 1

    Yes, Durons are fabbed at Fab 25 in Austin, Texas. However, by the highly scientific process of glancing at any AMD processor, you will find the code words "ASSEMBLED IN MALAYSIA".

    I am told this is Malaysian for "Assembled in Malaysia".

    Granted, I don't think most sweatshops are up to the task of packaging processors, as a couple of water molecules will kind of screw them up. And I doubt the people working for AMD are getting slighted by local standards - their work environment must be clean because of the job done there. But saying that AMD processors are not made in Malaysia is obviously wrong, as the die that is fabbed in Austin is packaged there.

  61. Re:Greater source of hot air:Bob Metcalfe ot Ellis by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ellison is without doubt the most pompous jackass I've ever seen in my life.

    Harlan or Larry?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  62. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Telemakhos · · Score: 1
    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.

    Yes, of course AMD has long been known for using child labor in Asian sweatshops to manufacture unAmerican chips that promote piracy.

  63. Linux users? by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

    I'd bet big money linux users aren't Walmart's primary target for "Clean PCs". I'd guess a large portion of those PCs are used with illegal copies of Windows... Which work fine with winmodems.

    1. Re:Linux users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's *exactly* what they are doing. Wal-Mart could
      care less about Linux or FreeBSD. They can sell a
      computer for less than thier "competition"-- that is the
      bottom line. Microtel sees that it can make more $$
      by changing a "minor" detail in the package. Both are
      the same people that ask thier SysAdmins for a ripped
      copy of WinXX for the "home computer"... High Hopes.

  64. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Provincialist · · Score: 2, Interesting
    their globalization tactics,

    Addressed in the previous post.

    their use of third-world labor,

    There are very few industries that can be said not to use "third-world" [his term, I don't use it myself] labor. If you wear clothing, use gasoline, shop at a grocery store, or make less than $100K a year I have no doubt that you have patronised such an industry. But please don't feel guilty about that. The man, woman, or teenager who is hired for $1 a day to sew shoes might be able to support a family that otherwise might have to scavenge for much less. I don't doubt that abuse occurs, and it should be stopped where it is identified. I'd love to see Wal-Mart institute a program to do just that. But I can't agree with an ignorant, blanket statement that would have us deal a staggering blow to the economies of nations like Malaysia, Peru, Thailand, Mexico, India, Nigeria, etc. Maybe you imagine a world in which we could snap our fingers and all countries would be "modernised" at once. We don't live in that world. Maybe you think that they should all just go back to picking bananas and pulling rickshaws. That sort of thinking would be an insult to all the rational adults who just happen not to have been born in the developed world. They do have problems, but the solutions to them lie far more in jobs and economic development than in aid and the exploitation of natural resources.

    Even if you a leg to stand on in the above, Wal-Mart is more strongly identified in the minds of most people with "buy american" than most other large retailers.

    and their opression of competition in small-towns

    Just what do you understand the word "competition" to mean? Wal-Mart closes down mom-and-pop stores because they can't compete. Wal-Mart typically brings an orders of magnitude greater selection of products to a town, and then offers significantly lower prices for those products. Monopolistic behavior would then dictate a raising of prices after local competition had left, but I challenge you to cite a study that has found this. In the small towns in which I've lived most of my life, we were happy if we could reap the benefits of capitalism by driving 30 miles to a Wal-Mart. Our communities appreciate a large employer for the uneducated for whom we struggle to find jobs. Gone is the time when we would "just wait" for an item that we wanted or needed. Wal-Mart is a healthy phenomenon for the general public. In most cases I've seen, efficient retailers like auto parts stores, farm supplies, hardware stores, pharmacies, and the like have survived. It's nineteenth-century dinosaurs like general stores or clothing stores that have gone by the wayside. Or maybe we should just go back to picking peas like the bumpkins you know we are?

    A large portion of Wal-Mart's merchandise is produced in third-world countries under sweatshop conditions. This immoral and unethical business practice may save you a few pennies at the checkout but it exploits children and exaggerates the distance between socioeconomic classes.

    Please cite any source at all for these statements. Please quantify "large portion".

    Even the processor in the "linux-friendly PC" sold at Wal-Mart is manufactured from child labor in third-world countries. It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia. [sic]

    Is it actually well known that the AMD plants in Malaysia that manufacture Durons use child labor? I've spent some time in Malaysia, and while it certainly isn't the U.S. [nor would I expect it to be], it is a rapidly modernising nation with a strong tradition of caring for its population, and a growing concern for the education of all young people. Malays appreciate the benefits of modern life as well as taking pride in their distinction as a culture and a nation.

    I would urge everyone concerned with the exploitation of the poor children to purchase only American-made genuine Intel processors. Furthermore, using third-world labor for manufacturing causes significant harm to the American economy because of the tens of thousands of blue collar manufacturing jobs which have been moved overseas.

    Ah, finally. Here it is. You, sir, are a protectionist. First, do you consider the manufacture of computers to be a traditional blue collar industry? How many jobs existed in this industry in the U.S. 20 years ago that have since moved overseas? Then, please realize that the productivity gains, which are the only drivers of sustained economic growth, over those 20 years have come about as a combination of the use of cheap overseas labor and information technology. Would you really like to trade in our economy for that of the early 1980s, even if we could? Do you imagine that any other components of your "genuine Intel" PCs are manufactured in the U.S.? As a side comment, I would much rather have my current job as an IT consultant than any manufacturing job.

    Wal-Mart portrays a patriotic image in its advertising campaigns, but in reality is an evil corporate monster who exploits children for the sake of its own bottom line.

    Like most companies not directly involved in the manufacture of chemicals, Wal-Mart is amoral. I would love to see it implement a program to find and eliminate child labor, but its effect in developing nations is overall positive. It is one of the strengths of capitalism that for the most part it encourages amoral individuals and organizations to improve the lives of real people, in the U.S. and elsewhere.

    The best way to fight this is with our dollars. Don't spend any money at Wal-Mart and support their evil globalised empire. If we all band together, we can stop this evil menace.

    This is funny, and makes me wonder if I've been trolled. Ah well, too late. I'm sure others have had these thoughts, even if you haven't.

    later,
    Jess

    --
    I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
  65. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with it? What's wrong with it?!

    Why, it crushes cultures, it smashes traditions, it takes good honest people and corrupts them into the American way of greed and profit.

    In short, absolutely nothing. People fear globalization because they are weak, and feel they must keep up with the latest fads and trends, betraying their own beliefs.

    Just because you shop at, say, Wal-mart, doesn't mean you have to embrace American pop culture and start foaming at the mouth over the backdoor boys or whatever.

    It's just that some people haven't quite figured that out yet.

  66. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by singularity · · Score: 1

    Are you so certain that Wal-Mart has not priced commonly purchased products at below-cost so as to drive out competition?

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  67. People should stay away from Walmart by csguy314 · · Score: 1

    It really is an evil company. More evil than M$ IMHO.
    Globalization is just a word people like to throw around. And the use of 3rd world labour in and of itself is not the real problem.
    But Walmart, like many other western companies, use cheap labour economies without really giving anything back to them. This isn't really the problem, it's just the after effects of the problem which was originally created by some corrupt government, the IMF and the WTO.
    This aside, Walmart is also one of the worst abusers of child labour. It's right up there (if not worse than) with Nike.
    And to be honest, I feel that this goes against everything freedom and the open source movement stands for. Which is why I'll never support Walmart. I don't care if they start supporting the open source market. I don't even care if they donate a million dollars to the FSF (though that would be cool, however unlikely). They're not a moral company and will never have my support.
    The worst part is Walmart is a supporter for a website to report exploitation of children...
    oh the Enrony of it all!!!

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    1. Re:People should stay away from Walmart by BitterOak · · Score: 5, Funny
      As I understand it, Linux was devolped in Finland, and its author, Linus Torvalds, has not been paid for his work. So all you open source advocates who want Walmart to sell Linux-friendly PCs are really supporting the use of cheap foreign labor. Shame on you!

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:People should stay away from Walmart by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Most companies are evil. The whole point of companies is to lie to and cheat consumers to get them to part with their hard-earned money.

      Frogs, on the other hand, are gentle creatures, and neither coerce nor intimidate.

      Well, uh, OK, frogs eat flies, but that's frog nature, and not even nature (red in tooth and claw) is as cruel as a company with a hyped-up marketing division.

      graspee

    3. Re:People should stay away from Walmart by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      and people bitch that wal-mart puts the lil guy out of business, which is true, but now they are putting Winn-Dixie out in Texas and Oklahoma. Fear that.

    4. Re:People should stay away from Walmart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, not quite. It's just that power-hungry people tend to gravitate towards companies.

  68. New Record? by Dynastar454 · · Score: 1

    88 +1 or better posts and not a single mention of the Akihabara bit. I wonder if this is a record.... either way, I just broke the streak, so ha! :-)

    --


    Laugh at stupidity: mod idiots +1 Funny.
  69. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by jcast · · Score: 1

    Yes. Wal-Mart just gets lower prices than some people want to believe; that's all.

    --
    There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
    -- David D. Friedman
  70. on call at night. by Cheeze · · Score: 1

    Q: what do you do if it's 3am, and you just got called in to work because your work's mail server cpu fan decided to die?

    A: you haul your ass down to wal-mart, pick up the best microtel machine you can put on your credit card, and take it up to work. switch out the drives and maybe the network card, and you're back in business. figure about 2 hours total work.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  71. Akihabara -- Japanese Keyboards by Elias+Ross · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...but alas, almost all had Japanese keyboards and the Japanese version of Windows

    I'm typing on a Japanese computer right now. The keyboard is just fine for typing in English. I don't understand the problem with getting a Japanese keyboard. There are a few extra keys and Japanese letters (hiragana) in addition to the usual letters, but I'd say it's way cooler, not a problem.

    Japanese Windows, of course, requires you to be able to read, but all good geeks can install an English operating system on their computers.

    1. Re:Akihabara -- Japanese Keyboards by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about something with computers for 'foreign' countries. What does the initial BIOS and POST screens look like when they boot? And not just Japanese, but also German, Italian, Swedish, Greek, Swahili, whatever.

      Is there any website out there with pics?

    2. Re:Akihabara -- Japanese Keyboards by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      Also Japanese keyboards have a weirdy, small space bar compared to our occidental and lengthy one.

      And lest anyone be tempted to descend into racist genital-comparison jokes I should point out that the reason for this is that Japanese text does not have spaces in it, so it is only used when typing phrases in English.

      On my recent trip to Tokyo what most impressed me was the new Vaio, model PCG-U1. You can check it out here.

      Basically it's even smaller than the last series of Picturebooks (C1-XX series), but has even better stats- e.g. Transmeta over 800Mhz, 20G, 256MB etc- and the screen is finally the right aspect ratio.

      Trust me, when you see it in the flesh you will fall in love... (I nearly broke down when I discovered I couldn't afford it despite the fact it cost only 750 UKP, which is probably less than half what it will cost me if it ever gets to the UK).

      graspee

    3. Re:Akihabara -- Japanese Keyboards by Provincialist · · Score: 1
      As a touch typist of English, Japanese keyboards annoy me precisely because they are so much like American keyboards. If the keys were completely different, presumably one could learn the other system. On a Japanese keyboard, the letters are in the same place. But, I type punctuation as well as letters, and with the Japanese keyboards it seems like 60% of the punctuation is not where I expect it to be. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I totally understand that it could be a disincentive to an American shopping in Akihabara. When I worked in Japan the company provided a laptop with an American keyboard. Then whenever I moved to a server or a desktop I would have to curse for about a minute before continuing my work.

      later,
      Jess

      --
      I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
    4. Re:Akihabara -- Japanese Keyboards by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      First, do you even realise how stupid it sounds when you talk about countries other than the US (I presume) to people from those countries as being "foreign"? At least you quoted it, so maybe you do... Anyway, here in Sweden, I've yet to see a computer with anything but English texts in its BIOS. I don't know if the actual BIOS code needs to contain anything country-specific for the keyboard mapping to be right, though. I would suspect that's a "DOS-era" question, and that typical real modern operating systems are smart enough to handle the issue by themselves.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    5. Re:Akihabara -- Japanese Keyboards by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do realise how stupid it sound, and that _is_ why I quoted it. But that is a proper way to phrase it, since I live in the US. I could have said it in a different way, but that's the way I thought the question, so that's the way I typed it. But thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt. :^)

      And thanks for the info. I was just wondering if the text was in the country's native language, since not everyone in the world speaks English. Not sure that the keyboard mapping is an issue.

  72. Re: Hacking at the ties that bind by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

    Post your address, and I'll send you a motherboard. PCI was out with 486's. What, you think it's a Pentium only connection?

  73. adequacy.org by Provincialist · · Score: 1
    The link didn't point to the story I was expecting, but the exceedingly link-happy story about "Your Son the Computer Hacker" I got certainly put me off adequacy.org for the present. Would you say it is typical of adequacy.org stories? Because it was simply idiotic.

    later,
    Jess

    --
    I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
    1. Re:adequacy.org by Telemakhos · · Score: 1

      The troller (yes, you were trolled) who started the thread seemed to have been inspired by the adequacy.org article. Specifically, question #3 of the adequacy article deals with AMD processors being used exclusively by hackers.

      The article was funny back when it first came out back in December. It's old now, and I'm surprised the idea of AMD as a transnational corporation exploiting native populations for cheap labor made its way into a troll five months later. I don't know if the rest of Adequacy's articles are written in the same style, but this one, with its links-a-plenty, reminds me vaguely of a low-brow Suck (the Wired spin-off that was worth reading once upon a time).

      It's rather irksome that so many people actually thought AMD used Asian sweatshops to manufacture chips. Almost as annoying as the number of people who can't spell Malaysia.

    2. Re:adequacy.org by Provincialist · · Score: 1
      LOL

      thanks,
      Jess

      --
      I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
    3. Re:adequacy.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i feel sort of bad "ruining the joke", but adequacy is 100% troll content. Once you realize this, it's actually a pretty funny site. Most of the people posting there are in on the joke, but there are always a few quality "THATS OUTRAGEOUS!" type posts from newbies who don't get it, and thats what really makes it fun.

      I'm posting this AC, because admitting what adequacy.org really is might well be punishable by death in some circles.

  74. Martin Guerre by BigDaddy · · Score: 1
    I have to disagree. Like many of the earlier Simpsons epidodes, The Principle and the Pauper is a parody of an earlier famous work. In this case it is taken directly from Martin Guerre, a musical.

    You may have mixed opinions about using famous literature/film/theatre for the basis for Simpsons episodes, but I, for one, think that's what makes the show intelligent. Most of the best material is a parody of great works. Rosebud (the episode where Burns searches for his bear Bobo) is often shot for shot a copy of Citizen Kane.

    I will be the first to agree that the Simpsons has gone down hill, but I would contend that it is because they've stopped alluding to famous works.

    Also, this was an opportunity for me to be pedantic, which I would hate to miss. ;)

    --
    You can't get a blue screen on a black and white monitor.
    1. Re:Martin Guerre by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree. Like many of the earlier Simpsons epidodes, The Principle and the Pauper is a parody of an earlier famous work. In this case it is taken directly from Martin Guerre [musicalheaven.com], a musical.

      I'd imagine they got the idea from the Prince and the Pauper story, since the name and the fact that its a more common take on the plot.. who's not familar with the prince and the pauper? Who's heard of Martin Guerre?

    2. Re:Martin Guerre by nomadic · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't the storyline per se; it's the complete destruction of continuity. It just makes a lot of the previous episodes not make sense.

  75. If it's not funny, don't watch it. by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

    See - you lose the Simpsons either way. Either Groening takes your advice and stops the episodes, or you stop watching because it's not fun anymore. You can say it "jumped the shark" all you want, but it's not going to change how it's produced one bit.

    I've personally noticed that it's changed, but I don't think that it's for better or for worse. Yes - they've overdone Homer being stupid, as they overdid Bart-the-smartass in seasons one and two. They'll move on to something else when people get bored of this. Hopefully concentrating on the fringe characters a bit more - I mean, the newest one is what? Disco Stu? And he's been around for years now.

    There are very few episodes I've watched that weren't worth watching. There have been one or two every season for the past 4 or 5 years that have just been a waste of my time, but there have also been the one or two brilliant ones. In any case, I'm just glad there's still something to watch on Sundays. I think we all know in our heart of hearts that when the Simpsons is gone, it won't be replaced by quality.

  76. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

    lol (seriously)

    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia

    It's a good thing too! Working in those clean rooms is the only way those poor tots ever get a bath!

  77. Re:Greater source of hot air:Bob Metcalfe ot Ellis by KILNA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harlan or Larry?
    Yes.

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  78. Clambaiting by Rupert · · Score: 2

    Since we know Google spiders /., it would be helpful if you'd make Scientologists a link to xenu.net instead of some random phrase. After all, we all know where to go to get information on Scientology, but your casual Google queryist might not. Right?

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
    1. Re:Clambaiting by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 2

      I'd be glad to help. After all, if someone comes to Google looking for a cult, I'd like for them to know where to find a cult.

      --

      "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
    2. Re:Clambaiting by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      I can't believe someone brought up Scientology on Slashdot and there are only two replies in the thread.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  79. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh and, by the way, it's spelled "tolerance".

    Ya know, I always assumed he was putting it on there to be ironic.

  80. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by gilroy · · Score: 2
    Blockquoth the poster:

    Are you so certain that Wal-Mart has not priced commonly purchased products at below-cost so as to drive out competition?

    Not so much a fan of WalMart, but... Do you have evidence that they have? I think it's pretty clear that the burden of proof is on those charging misdeeds. Crying "monopolist!" while getting whupped in the marketplace is almost as easy as crying "witch!" when getting whupped farming. It's entirely possible that Wal-Mart has legitimately leveraged their volume -- plus their documented operational efficiency -- into lower prices. I sympathize with people who bemoan the loss of the small American downtown... but those people seem to shop at the ole Box'N'Shop as well.
  81. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by puckhead · · Score: 1
    It is a well known fact that AMD Duron processors are made in a sweatshop in Maylasia.


    ROFLMAO
    --
    Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
  82. LOOKS LIKE SOME FUTURAMA LOOSER HAS MOD POINTS(nt) by lowell · · Score: 0, Troll

    nt

  83. Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK, since there seems to be next to no posts regarding the Akihabara page, here I go... (sorry to be harsh, but I spend a lot of time there, so it sort of gets my goat to see someone come along, go around a few shops, write up a single-page report, and get that posted to /.).

    The Akihabara district of Tokyo is world-famous as a shopping district specializing in electrical and electronic equipment. I had the chance to visit the Akihabara while on an Elderhostel tour of Japan in April, 2002. (The name is pronounced ah-kee-ha-ba-rah, with no stress on any syllable. It is not, as English speakers want to say, aki-HAbara or akiha-BAra. The syllables just roll out all at the same level.)

    Not really. Spoken Japanese does not use stress as a marker, but rather pitch. 'Akihabara' declines in pitch towards the end of the word.

    Akihabara is a station on the Japan Railways line and on the Tokyo subway. The railway station is a bit more convenient. This is what you see as you start down from the station platform.

    A bit more convenient, if you happen to be using a JR line - if you're on a subway line, the subway exit is the way to go.

    There are lots of people on the street (but that's true everywhere in Tokyo). This was Sunday morning at 11AM.

    Akihabara's main street is closed to traffic on most Sundays.

    The district is roughly 6 city blocks square. Some of the streets are wide, as above, and some are narrow and have that "oriental bazaar" feel to them.

    It's quite considerably larger than that - certainly, most of the larger stores are toward the station, but if you head down the road in the direction of the Suehirocho station, there's many smaller shops in the back streets.

    This place also sold a variety of CPU and memory chips. Here is the price list. Multiply Yen by 0.008 to get dollars (as of 4/02). Thus the 2.4Ghz P4 was selling for about $575. These prices, as with most prices in the Akihabara, did not strike me as wonderful bargains. Good prices, but not good enough to cover the airfare to Tokyo!

    Gee, I'm so sorry... strange as it may seem, shops in Akihabara don't take your plane fare into account when setting their prices.

    Notice the number of clerks. Like every Japanese retail store, there are many, many clerks, all eager to be helpful. Japanese retail stores are grossly overstaffed by American standards.

    ...which could easily be rewritten to say, "American stores are grossly understaffed by Japanese standards." How often have I seen people complaining that they can't find a clerk in a US Fry's?

    The prices for Apple stuff seemed to be about the same as US prices.

    That's because Apple engages in price-fixing in Japan (they were actually convicted of it once, but it's obvious that it still goes on).

    Many stores sold games. This one is advertising the Nintendo for about $200. There were also Sega and Sony game stores. I don't know what the game is that is featured in the window display. The box was all Japanese except for the line "The voices of a distant star."

    It's called 'Hoshi no Koe' ('The Voice of the Stars' is close enough).

    When I looked closely at these PDAs I found the screen display was all in Japanese.

    OH MY GOD!!! You're KIDDING!!!! Japanese PDAs in Japan... who would have thought it?!?

    Most of the larger stores devoted much floor space to items of interest to local people, especially appliances: washing machines, microwaves, rice cookers and the like. And some absolutely gorgeous, 16:9-format TVs, which, or course, would be useless in the US.

    Obviously, these stores should immediately devote a minimum of 70% of their floor space to items that are of interest to Americans.

    There were lots of laptops to be seen, but alas, almost all had Japanese keyboards and the Japanese version of Windows. The prices for most laptops seemed to be pretty close to US prices for comparable models. The only bargains were on closeouts (clearly marked in English, "last one").

    ...I don't need to hammer the point any more, do I? (BTW, the reason you didn't find any 'bargains' was because you were looking in the wrong place - if you want a cheap laptop, the best way to find one is either online or check some of the smaller shops for weekend specials).

    The only place you find English keyboards is in the big stores, in what are advertised as "Duty Free" departments. "Duty Free" is a misnomer -- all the goods were made in Japan, so there is no question of avoiding an import duty.

    The 'Duty Free' in this case refers to the lack of the 5% consumption tax on items (which he does mention later on, although he doesn't link the two facts).

    All in all, about what I'd expect from a tourist on a quick spin through the larger shops...

    1. Re:Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd just like to send a big 'fuck you' to the moderator with the microsecond attention span who seems to have decided that my post was a direct copy of the Akihabara article, rather than a commentary on it.

    2. Re:Akihabara by Belly · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I had any mod points, you'd be getting them. I live in Tokyo, and you hit the nail(s) on the head.

      Yes folks, most of the shops/shopping in Akihabara is in fact aimed at local Japanese (shock, horror!)

      3 hours in Akihabara will just scratch the surface - there are heaps of small shops, many further away from the main train station where rent is cheaper, with more interesting bargains.

      Anyway, Akihabara has variety but not necessarily the best prices - because it is 'Akihabara', rent is high, and shops price stuff accordingly.

      I'm still laughing that this guy was actually surprised/disappointed to find lots of Japanese PDAs and PCs with Japanese keyboards in Japan of all places...

    3. Re:Akihabara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting



      jeez-
      do you really think this guy wrote his summery of that place so japanese people can use it as a guide?
      It is written in his own perspective- american.

    4. Re:Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 1

      What if it were this way round: "I went to Silicon Valley and looked at Fry's. It was reasonable, but not cheap enough to cover the cost of the flight from Tokyo. On top of that, all the PCs were running ENGLISH Windows!"

      I'm sure you'd be jumping all over him.

    5. Re:Akihabara by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      (If I hadn't breezed through two sets of mod points in the last 10 days, I'd be modding you up instead of responding to you).

      You are so right. Someone needed to jump all over this guy. I mean, "JAPANESE displays in JAPAN!?" Good lord. And if the prices are comparable to US prices, that sounds pretty good to me considering that most things in Japan cost a *lot* more than they do in the States.

      Observations like the ones in this article make me cringe.

    6. Re:Akihabara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which could easily be rewritten to say, "American stores are grossly understaffed by Japanese standards." How often have I seen people complaining that they can't find a clerk in a US Fry's?


      Clearly you haven't shopped in a US Fry's.

      I spend most of my time there trying to AVOID the useless and annoying 'staff'. 9 out of 10 of them can't do more than re-read the 2 line product description on the shelf directly in front of whatever it is you're interested in. The other 1 doesn't know how to read.

      Only go to Fry's if you know exactly what you want and where to find it without having to ask for assistance. Unfortunately you can't avoid the inane checkout process unless you go somewhere else.

    7. Re:Akihabara by Things+To+Do+Tuesday · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, since there seems to be next to no posts regarding the Akihabara page, here I go... (sorry to be harsh, but I spend a lot of time there, so it sort of gets my goat to see someone come along, go around a few shops, write up a single-page report, and get that posted to /.).

      Why does that bother you? Were YOUR far far superior submissions to slashdot on this subject rejected or something, giving you the right to bitch?

      Gee, I'm so sorry... strange as it may seem, shops in Akihabara don't take your plane fare into account when setting their prices.

      Holy shit, talk about getting defensive about your adopted homeland. If the guy thought he was in for some life-changing bargains, then he was obviously wrong. He's just pointing that fact out, and really, was his statement wrong? Chill out, I don't think the guy was trying to offend anyone...a good idea for non-trolls.

      ...which could easily be rewritten to say, "American stores are grossly understaffed by Japanese standards." How often have I seen people complaining that they can't find a clerk in a US Fry's?

      Again with the "how dare you" attitude. By American standards (note, he implies nothing about superiority), many Japanese stores ARE overstaffed - in my experience, as well as the article author's, PLEASANTLY so.

      OH MY GOD!!! You're KIDDING!!!! Japanese PDAs in Japan... who would have thought it?!?

      See, now this was almost funny. Just lose all that extraneous punctuation, and you're halfway down the road to clown school.

      Obviously, these stores should immediately devote a minimum of 70% of their floor space to items that are of interest to Americans.

      Obviously, slashdot posters should devote 100% of their posts to inferring offense from an "outsider's" analysis. Do I have to say it? HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH, those Japanese TVs are not ideal for use outside of Japan.

      All in all, about what I'd expect from a tourist on a quick spin through the larger shops...

      All in all, about what I'd expect from a fanatical Western-raised Japan fanboy on a quick spin through slashdot.

      Now, I have things to do Tuesday.

      1. Insult a Japanese man
      2. Fuck his wife, girlfriend, and daughters

    8. Re:Akihabara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was interesting, at least he bothered to put a page up detailing his trip.

      I enjoyed reading it, for what its worth.

    9. Re:Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 1

      My apologies. People must have been saying that they "can't find a *useful* clerk in a US Fry's".

    10. Re:Akihabara by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Uh, no. Not if it was written in Japanese and hosted on a Japan-centric website. Then I guarantee no one on /. would say a damn thing. And it would have been a valid and useful (if obvious) warning to Japanese tourists in the US.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see... you're no doubt one of these people that are in japan on a fat expense account, living in an apartment in Akasaka or Roppongi, and think that they know everything about Japan.

      And as for your last comment about me being on a 'quick spin through slashdot', better check the user ID first, latecomer...

    12. Re:Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 1

      And it would have been a valid and useful (if obvious) warning to Japanese tourists in the US.

      I think you missed out the 'retard' between Japanese and tourist there...

    13. Re:Akihabara by zztzed · · Score: 1

      Latecomer? Who's the latecomer now?

      (Sorry, whenever people start a low-UID dick-waving contest, I just feel like I have to say something...)

    14. Re:Akihabara by Things+To+Do+Tuesday · · Score: 0

      Ah, I see... you're no doubt one of these people that are in japan on a fat expense account, living in an apartment in Akasaka or Roppongi, and think that they know everything about Japan.

      Oh yeah, it's so obvious. I can really see where in my post you've gotten that impression. Yep, I really can.

      Let me make note of your wisdom, so that I might apply it to future encounters with people I don't know: Anyone who asks me to be mindful of my attitude in defense of another's ideas is doubtlessly a well-funded pseudo-pundit who lives in either of two well-known Tokyo foreigner hotspots. Gotcha, sounds universal enough.

      On the other hand, the sheer arrogance that bursts out of every word you speak about the subject could, if harnessed correctly and focused into a single beam of energy, punch a hole through your low, thick brow.

      And as for your last comment about me being on a 'quick spin through slashdot', better check the user ID first, latecomer...

      Heeheehee, I've never been greeted by a seniority troll in a web forum or on netnews before. Hail, there! I wish I too can last long enough here to tease the newbies as elegantly as you, senpai. Only 924 more posts to go. Yoroshiku onegaishimasu!

      Now, I have things to do Tuesday.

      1. Catch yellow fever
      2. Catch gonorrhea

      Asshole.

    15. Re:Akihabara by BJH · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're one of the ones who rolled over for Taco when he introduced UIDs, aren't you?

      SOME of us stuck to our guns a bit longer ;)

    16. Re:Akihabara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us are still holding out.

    17. Re:Akihabara by mitheral · · Score: 1

      SOME of us stuck to our guns a bit longer ;)
      Yah, once they brought out slashboxes I couldn't hold out anymore.

    18. Re:Akihabara by acceleriter · · Score: 2
      It's quite possible that the real reason you were modded down is because you were being an asshole. You're lucky I don't have points right now, or I would have slapped you down 5 myself. Your condescension to the original poster was completely unnecessary.

      I'm capped. Bring it on.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    19. Re:Akihabara by PatientZero · · Score: 2
      ...and you're halfway down the road to clown school.

      I will thank you not to refer to Princeton that way.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  84. Jeez Guys, give him a link already! by tb3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just about everything you need to know about Harlan can be found on harlanellison.com. And check out the quote on the first page. Way to make friends, Harlan.

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    1. Re:Jeez Guys, give him a link already! by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      Somehow, I don't think Harlan spends a lot of his time trying to make friends.

      Rather the opposite.

      Excellent writer, though.

      - Robin

    2. Re:Jeez Guys, give him a link already! by jo42 · · Score: 1
      "Why do people keep insisting that I join the 21st Century? I *LIVE* in the 21st Century! I just don't want to be bothered by the shitheads on the internet!"

      Brilliant, astute observation!

    3. Re:Jeez Guys, give him a link already! by tb3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What you have to understand is, fifty years ago, Ellison single-handedly invented flaming.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  85. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done

    Its good to see my fellow Mensa member pointing out the evils of corporate consumerism to the less intellectually capable

  86. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you'll find much more 'Made in USA' merchandise at a Wal-Mart than any other store chain of it's size and scale.

    The aisle after aisle of only 'Made in China' shit is at Target and K-Mart.

    But your comment was really just a troll, wasn't it? The AMD part gives it away. Not that I consider AMD's products to be anything but flash, but whatever...

  87. Re: Hacking at the ties that bind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    486-66 and 486-100 boards often have PCI slots. Sometimes the bus is a little on the flaky side, but I have used 10/100 nics in 486-66 and better with good results.

  88. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Trekologer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Globalization is definately NOT evil. Yes, the U.S. does lose blue collar jobs to "third-world countries" but that is not necessarlly a bad thing. The reason that labor is so cheap in undeveloped nations in that it is very unproductive. If an employee wasn't working in a textile mill, making $1 a day, they would be without a job entirely. Sure, that wage is low according to our standards but when your next-best option is no job and starving, which would you pick? As the workforce becomes more skilled and educated, the price of labor becomes more expensive. Look at Japan: following World War II, they were an underdeveloped nation and labor was cheap. Now, as the country has developed, the price of labor in Japan is near that in the US. Take Germany: highly skilled labor is, in fact, more expensive than in the U.S. but is used to produce finer-quality products (luxary vehicles are one).

    It would be exploiting a worker in the United States or other simarlly industrialized nation where the standard of living was high to pay a very low wage. So what happens? Ideally, the price of the imported goods are cheaper than they would be if they were made domestically. The aggregate savings that society relizes can be used to reeducate the workforce that would have been manufacturing the imported good to perform work that requires more education or skills and then the standard of living for ALL Americans can increase. At the same time, underdeveloped countries will develop more and increase the standard of living in those countries.

    So, while globalization might force change, it is a change for the better. We get cheaper goods and a better standard of living. The foreign countries get meaningful jobs, the workforce and economy develops, and their standard of living increases. Global society as a whole is better off then it was before.

    I don't shop at Wal-Mart because of their illegal actions towards the attempted organization of their employees, among other reasons. But the fact that they sell foreign-made goods is not one of them.

  89. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously Mensa doesn't test spelling.

    Spelling is how ninnies with mediocre average-at-best intelligence get by in the world.

  90. Jump the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck, I hate that phrase.

    I bet you were one of those fucking morons during the dotcom madness saying things like 'clicks-and-mortar' and shit like that, right?

    FUCK OFF.

  91. AMD does -not- have sweatshops. by Sir+Homer · · Score: 0

    CPUs are NEVER hand-made. The proccess from start to finish is 100% machine/robotics. There is no human interventation during this process execpt managing the machines, which is done a very highly filtered enviroment. And they get paid well over what most Americans make. I hardly call it a sweatshop.

  92. Re:Slashback by rmohr02 · · Score: 1
    He claims he was misquoted and misunderstood in a Financial Times of London article that came out earlier this week and that he does indeed has stories for years and years.
    It seems he has been misstated again, unless that's the way his grammar is.
  93. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    Why are all the American IQs I see so high ? Is it similar to the having bigger golf balls thing ?

    I was of the opinion that about 1% of the population (of anywhere) had an IQ of above 120. I tested mine at 117 I think. Phhhhht. Even if I tested as 5000 points I would still say that intelligence can't be measured- there are too many biases and even tests that have supposedly been carefully controlled rely too much on knowledge rather than intelligence.

    Whatever.

    graspee

  94. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by jdkincad · · Score: 1

    It is my understanding that when Walmart first opens a store they sell at or below cost for the first six months. The large number of stores alow them to absorb any losses, but local "mom and pop" retailers can't.

    However, this was several years ago, and they may no longer do this.

    --
    The great advantage of having a reputation for being stupid: People are less suspicious of you.
  95. Carry that thought to its conclusion by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Namely, forbid interstate commerce. Forbid intercounty or even intercity or especially interneighborhood commerce.

    Where do you draw the line?

    Here's a thought. Money is the great equalizer. If someone can build something halfway around the world and ship it to me cheaper than I could make it myself, that's a win.

    Here's another thought. If that ship / train / truck / plane carries cargo to me from halfway around the world, it probably carries something back in the other direction.

  96. That's better than the alternative by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    If someone else can make something cheaper than we can, then that frees us up to do something NEW and BETTER. Would you still have us making buggy whips just to keep the jobs?

  97. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by ermineshay · · Score: 2, Informative

    "A large portion of Wal-Mart's merchandise is produced in third-world countries under sweatshop conditions"

    In fact, some of their merchandise has been shown to be manufactured in first-world countries under sweatshop conditions -- and by children, no less (i.e., the Kathie Lee thing). And of course, there's always the Wal-Mart practice of enforcing their own moralist values on their inventory/ services (e.g., their decision not to carry the morning-after pill).

    An MS-free PC is a very good thing...but the cost outweighs the...cost, or whatever it is I'm trying to say.

  98. Re: Hacking at the ties that bind by gomadtroll · · Score: 1

    Well just because I haven't seen one does not mean much. I build firewalls (free to good homes) out of 486 desktops for cable modem or dsl users, assisited living facitiies etc. It would be nice to recycle as much of the old stuff as possible, wireless is one more option.

    ps. If anyone wants to get rid of any 3com 3c509 cards...go for it :) gomadtroll@nospamoperamail.com

  99. Nice stretch there by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Where did I say anything about monopolies being good?

    Next time you post, try interspersing some facts or at least reasoning in amongst the rants.

    For instance, one benefit of globalization is more competition, such as third world steel mills. They can make steel a whole heck of a lot cheaper than the first world. Look up some facts on how much overcapacity there is among steel mills. Half could go out of business -- the inefficient half, mind you -- and the world would be better off because (1) those workers would find something more productive to do, and (2) the crappy inefficient mills would go out of business and stop polluting.

    Isn't that something! More and better work, less pollution -- bingo! Competition!

    Now what was it you liked so much about localization?

    1. Re:Nice stretch there by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      Next time you post, try interspersing some facts or at least reasoning in amongst the rants.
      emmm...

      i think you meant ranDts.

      xox,
      dead nancy
  100. Re: Hacking at the ties that bind by Nonillion · · Score: 0

    I had a Gigabyte GA-486?? with a AMD DX4 120MHz CPU and it had 3 pci slots.
    It was the fastest 486 I ever owned..

    rm -r windows

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  101. Is Walmart's PC a sell for Christina Ricci? by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

    What I want to see is Mandrake Linux 8.2 sitting on the shelf beside one of those naked machines ... Why not?!? I think it would be a great seller, considering the targeted demographic: slashdotters, M$-haters (is there a difference?), nerds in general, tight-wads, Christina Ricci in a thong.

    As far as the modem issue goes, I don't use the damned things anyway so there's no big loss.

    I think a large floating billboard featuring Christina Ricci in dental floss bikini might drive traffic too. I hope she does a Playboy issue soon :O)

    1. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Christina Ricci? by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

      Hey, if Christina Ricci came to the local Wal-Mart in a thong to buy a PC, I'd even help her install Linux on it!

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    2. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Christina Ricci? by magnified_plaid · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I'd try, but I'm also pretty sure I wouldn't be able to accomplish much...

      --
      Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
    3. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Christina Ricci? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      What's a "Christina Ricci"?

    4. Re:Is Walmart's PC a sell for Christina Ricci? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if Christina Ricci came to the local Wal-Mart in a thong to buy a PC, I'd even help her install Linux on it!

      Hey, if Christina Ricci came to the local Wal-Mart in a thong to buy a PC, I'd even help her install Windows on it!

  102. Ellison: I have no case and I must scream by tenzig_112 · · Score: 2

    Harlan Ellison is an excellent example of why one should never know what one's favorite authors are like as people.

    I loved Alone Against Tomorrow and his [imho] groundbreaking novella The Region Between. He was my undisputed king of unapologetically weird 70's-era sci fi.

    I would say "love" but it's impossible to pick them up again without thinking of his trite rants on the [old] Sci Fi Channel. Now he's suing AOL for serving up content he explicitly asked for.

    Harlan, Harlan. Feh.

  103. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by beakburke · · Score: 1

    Actually, I remember from economic development class that intel used to, and maybe still does, manufacture their processors in malaysia.

    Most of AMD's processors are made in fab 25 in Austin or in Fab 30 in Dresden.

    how's that for ironic

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  104. Chicken v. Egg by BigDaddy · · Score: 1


    I think it would be more fair to say that Martin Guerre was based upon The Prince and the Pauper. The Principle and the Pauper takes more from Martin Guerre than from the Twain novel. The key pointed shared by both Martin Guerre and the Simpsons is that an individual is seemingly killed in battle and then later returns to claim his rightful place in a community. In The Prince and the Pauper the two characters voluntarily change places to see what the other's life is like.
    </pedantic>

    --
    You can't get a blue screen on a black and white monitor.
  105. On Ellison by ewhac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lest Slashdot readers be tempted to dismiss Harlan Ellison as a technophobic crank, be aware that he is one of the most financially successful writers working in Hollywood today. He got that way by fighting the studios who tried to rip him off.

    Hollywood operates in large part on reputation fraud and misappropriation of other people's work, particularly screenwriters. Plot ideas and outlines are co-opted left and right. Writers in Hollywood do indeed work like dogs and end up getting treated about as well. Ellison stepped into these shark-infested waters many decades ago and has consistently and resolutely refused to allow himself to be fscked by the studios.

    Ellison is widely recognized as one of the most litigious writers out there, suing studios when they misappropriate his work. What's more, Harlan wins these suits almost all the time. Writing is his vocation and his passion, and he stands among some of the first names in science fiction. But he has seen too many of his friends and colleagues screwed by the studio system, doing lame knock-offs of their work and making millions while the writer goes hungry. Most creative types -- me included -- would just roll over and go, "Oh, well, what can I do about it?"

    Not Harlan. He bitch-slaps these creeps up Sunset Blvd. and back until they get the clue: You don't take a writer's work without paying for it.

    Where Harlan has gone wrong, IMHO, is that he has misconceptualized the nature of the "wrong" against him. Ellison's entire experience of having his work copied has been in the context of Hollywood studios and publishers. Studios copy Harlan's work, and make money off it. So Harlan sues the studio. Then he sees copies of his work are, "all over AOL," and AOL's making money off it. Ergo, the same solution applies.

    Except it doesn't.

    I hope someone can explain this to Ellison. His stock and trade is science fiction. We need the imaginations of men like him to provide the ideas and invent a future where copying is ubiquitous and unconstrained, and artists still get handsomely remunerated.

    Schwab

    1. Re:On Ellison by HiThere · · Score: 2

      The very characteristics that made him successful in defending his work in Hollywood, work against him here. Ellison is famed for his temper, and has been for many decades. And he is not known for being courteous to fans.

      OTOH, I can't imagine that he's been in so many fights and arguments without learning to choose ones that he can win to persue. If he chooses to persue this one, it's a bad sign.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:On Ellison by Zarquon · · Score: 2
      Writing is his vocation and his passion, and he stands among some of the first names in science fiction.


      Eh? Not sure what planet you're on, or at least what ranking system you're using..
      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    3. Re:On Ellison by TrinSF · · Score: 2

      C'mon Schwab, you're talking out your ass here. While I'm the first person to come to Harlan's defense, he's by no means "one of the most financially successful writers working in Hollywood", today or ever. Your other "facts" are equally specious.

      As someone much more familar with Harlan's writings for and about Hollywood, I can see your comments for what they are -- Harlanesque bombast. Before you wax all quixotic on the subject, try actually researching the topic.

      -Trin

  106. Prions? Why that's a Papua thing, isn't it? by Provincialist · · Score: 1
    rot their brain with prions

    I'm sure that the first documented case of a prion-based disease was among the cannibals of Papua New Guinea. I'm not sure if it was the same prion that causes Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, but they got it the same way the cows did: by eating brains. Don't assume that civilization invented any biological problem. Of course, your noble savage would probably not eat human brains, but sometimes you can't be particular.

    later,
    Jess

    --
    I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
  107. Re:Processors are not Made in Malaysia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Writting from the afore mentioned Third World Country where it was claimed that our children labours in sweatshops instead of going to school...

    I know for a fact that Malaysia has 2 silicon wafer foundries - Silterra and First Silicon. Neither make any processors for AMD (I don't think they even make CPUs of any kind, mostly communications/networking products). Secondly most Intel and AMD processors are packaged in Malaysia from chips make around the world - Intel with its 6 fabs worldwide and AMD chips from US of A and Dresden, Germany (yes, that University town that Le May almost bombed to oblivion half a century ago). They are packaged by the same packaging company that is listed on the KL Stock Exchange.

    As of our children, they have to endure compulsory education until they are 15. And most Malaysian children who eventually go to colleges gets into government funded one where the fees are cheap and those who cannot afford it can even take low interest loans... and I know we don't have the majority of our college students having to work in the sweatshops bearing names like McDonald's to fund their studies...

    I use an AMD processor and proud of it... as of American jobs going overseas, well, semiconductor manufacturing (most of it) are going down the profitability scale and even those in this part of the world will move to China eventually...

    Thank God I am not a cary carrying member of an elitist, shamelessly self promoting organisation that admits people on the basis of intelligence defined purely by themselves, for themselves. I'd rather be just another Anonymous coward

  108. Processors are not Made in Malaysia (Requalified) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Writting from the afore mentioned Third World Country where it was claimed that our children labours in sweatshops instead of going to school...

    I know for a fact that Malaysia has 2 silicon wafer foundries - Silterra and First Silicon. Neither make any processors for AMD (I don't think they even make CPUs of any kind, mostly communications/networking products). Secondly most Intel and AMD processors are packaged in Malaysia from chips make around the world - Intel with its 6 fabs worldwide and AMD chips from US of A and Dresden, Germany (yes, that University town that Le May almost bombed to oblivion half a century ago). They are packaged by the same packaging company that is listed on the KL Stock Exchange.

    As of our children, they have to endure compulsory education until they are 15. And most Malaysian children who eventually go to colleges gets into government funded ones where the fees are cheap and those who cannot afford it can take low interest loans... and I know we don't have the majority of our college students having to work in the sweatshops bearing names like McDonald's to fund their studies...

    I use an AMD processor and proud of it... as of American jobs going overseas, well, semiconductor manufacturing (most of it) are going down the profitability scale and even those in this part of the world will move to China eventually...

    Thank God I am not a cary carrying member of an elitist, shamelessly self promoting organisation that admits people on the basis of intelligence defined purely by themselves, for themselves. I'd rather be just another Anonymous coward.

    [Written following assumption that the self proclaimed resident genius meant 'Malaysia' when he typed 'Maylasia']

  109. Score one for the DMCA (but on *which side*??) by po8 · · Score: 2

    It is interesting to read the whole decision in Ellison v. AOL. IANAL, but apparently the issue of contributory copyright infringement (as opposed to direct infringement and vicarious infringement, which starts to explain why IANAL) would have gone to trial but for the fact that AOL met one of the "safe-harbor" provisions of the DMCA.

    So Usenet is apparently saved by the DMCA. Depending on how you feel about Usenet, this is either an ironic victory or yet another reason to curse the day the DMCA was enacted.

  110. Attention S-Mart Shoppers by Slickoil · · Score: 0

    Every one know that to shop smart, shop S-Mart. It's the only way to go..

  111. I dont care... by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

    ... because in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

  112. Hardware modems -- legal protection by jms · · Score: 3, Insightful

    [switching to hardware modems] may not seem like it's very significant, but it is. Consider this: One of the world's largest retailers has decided that the Open Source community may be a viable marketplace. Wal-Mart has promoted products aimed at us. And that has opened the door for us to be heard, not as techies, but as consumers.

    All true, and it also occurred to me that changing to a Linux-friendly modem is a very, very smart move on the part of Microtel.

    If Microsoft were to sue Microtel and Walmart under some theory of contributory copyright infringement -- inducing people to buy computers for the purpose of pirating Windows, it would be difficult for Microtel or Walmart to make the argument that those computers were intended for Linux use, if they contained hardware that is designed to only work under Windows.

    1. Re:Hardware modems -- legal protection by Quila · · Score: 2

      Who cares about Linux use (or BSD, etc.) under this argument. Say I just wanted new hardware to move my old copy of Windows over to.

      Microsoft's license gestappo may be able to intimidate small vendors with their "if it's not Windows, it's piracy" policy, but there's no way Microsoft (total assets $59 billion) can go up against Wal-Mart (more than 3x that in sales alone last year).

    2. Re:Hardware modems -- legal protection by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      They could, in fact, go after Walmart. The difference is that since Walmart has the resources to fight back, the case is more likely to be decided on its merits instead of on M$ resources. By including a real modem, it is now much less likely that M$ could win.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Hardware modems -- legal protection by mitheral · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's license gestappo may be able to intimidate small vendors with their "if it's not Windows, it's piracy" policy, but there's no way Microsoft (total assets $59 billion) can go up against Wal-Mart (more than 3x that in sales alone last year).

      Now there's a cage match I'd pay to see :). Afterall MS has something like $40 BILLION dollars in cash equivelents just sitting around. And Wal-Mart would probably win and then we'd hear a lot less from the BSA I'd bet.

  113. This is who Martin Guerre is. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2

    Martin Guerre was a sixteenth-century French peasant who returned from war to find that he had "returned" years earlier and had been living tidily with his wife for some time.

    There followed a great trial to determine which one was the "real" Guerre. The real one lost.

    It's a famous historical episode in early modern history. Needless to say, it a) predates Mark Twain and b) is obviously the basis of the musical (and a movie with Gerard Depardieu).

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    1. Re:This is who Martin Guerre is. by tps12 · · Score: 1
      (and a movie with Gerard Depardieu)

      And a movie with Richard Gere. I believe it's called "Somerset."

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  114. In Defense of Wal-Mart by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2

    The latest Walmart controversy (as heard on NPR): they're running supermarkets in their stores and employing non-union butchers.

    Good. You ever been forced to work in a closed shop (mandatory union membership)? It sucks.

    Supposedly Walmart treats their employees like crap. Maybe you and I don't have to worry about getting a job as a cashier, but that's no reason to applaud paying people next to nothing just so you can get a better deal on paper towels.

    Wal-Mart helped pioneer employee stock ownership plans. If you've ever been to a Sam's Club, they have the stock price posted next to the employee lounge. Wal-Mart means employment to a lot of people in a lot places more blighted than you'll ever see. Why do they pay people "next to nothing"? Why do you pay upwards of $1000 for an apartment in Silicon Valley? Because the cost of living is different in different places.

    Which is better for the economy, a bunch of people in each city making good money selling goods at local stores, or a couple of guys in Texas making good money running a chain?

    Arkansas, actually. And a lot of the "good money" is being made by the employees because they are shareholders, as per above.

    There's the flip side of the coin, too - the price of everything going down by 20% means that everybody's purchasing power just went up by 20%. That means a lot of poor people can suddenly buy a lot more. Is that good for the economy? It means that a lot of people in rural America can suddenly breathe easier.

    I'm not a rabid Wal-Mart apologist. My family business was one of the countless small stores destroyed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. But the truth isn't as simple as "and then the giant came and destroyed everything".

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    1. Re:In Defense of Wal-Mart by pNutz · · Score: 1

      Good. You ever been forced to work in a closed shop (mandatory union membership)? It sucks

      Have you ever been paid $7.00 an hour for a butcher job? It's stressful, dangerous, disgusting work. Unions keep the wage at $14.00.

      Wal-Mart helped pioneer employee stock ownership plans

      As a WalMart employee for 2 years, I can tell you that 1% of your minimum wage paycheck does not add up to much of a 401k. Otherwise they work you just as crappy as any other grocer or department store. The stock sharing and benefits after 2 years is just a selling point for new employees. The place is typically filled with people carrying the "this is as good as it gets" additude and swaths of new people (someone would quit every week, at least).

      Because the cost of living is different in different places.

      And they always pay minimum wage, except for those oh-so-fortunate non-union butchers, managers, and a 50cent raise every year. Gosh I'm bitter, I guess it's my inefficiency talking.

      There's the flip side of the coin, too - the price of everything going down by 20% means that everybody's purchasing power just went up by 20%.

      Good lord, you'd think us hicks are swimming in filet mignon now that the WalMart moved in. As a resident of a poor swamp town, I can tell you it does nothing to help the downtrodden eat. Their bargin bin crap is priced the same as everyone else's bargin bin crap. Now, if you're poor, you get Great Value! brand.

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
  115. Wal-Mart in the 3rd World? by manual_overide · · Score: 1

    News to me. Everytime I've gone to Wal-Mart, the products produced by them bear a large sticker or label that says "Made in the USA" In fact, they've advertised that as a reason to shop there for quite some time.

    --
    If bad puns were like deli meat, this would be the wurst
    1. Re:Wal-Mart in the 3rd World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've apparently not looked around when shopping there. Examine just about *anything* that isn't food, and you will see "Made in..." [insert one of the following: China, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand, Taiwan].

      Having been truck driver whose only role in life was to deliver Wal-Mart freight, I can honestly say that the average consumer would be shocked at the sheer volume of import business Wal-Mart does even while they advertise their "Buy American..." policy.

      [FYI: W-M's policy on 'buying american' is that W-M will favor your American product IF AND ONLY IF you can provide it at a cost similar to the import version of your product.]

  116. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by bcboy · · Score: 2

    >The aggregate savings that society relizes can be used to reeducate the workforce that would have been manufacturing the imported good to perform work that requires more education or skills and then the standard of living for ALL Americans can increase.

    What country are YOU living in?

    I guess the emphasis is on "can". Of course this would never actually occur in the US. Rather, we will just join the race to the bottom, the gap between rich and poor will widen, and we can all listen to William F. Buckley musing "I don't see what the problem is" after he hires you to be his towel boy for a few peanuts a day (or the equivalent cash rate of the cheapest labor available globally).

    But, really, the main problem with "globalization" as it's being implemented is it hands the sovereignty of citizens to foreign businessmen. You no longer have democratic control of the laws in your community. A foreign businessman can over-turn them in a foreign court where you have no standing.

  117. Wal_mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So.. who cares what linux people think really from a marketing perspective. Less than 1% of consumer PCs are running linux. Big fucking deal.

  118. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by PMM · · Score: 0

    god damn mod this down you slack jawed moderators.

    I will not stand for any of this liberal ranting on my slashdot!

  119. Re Akhibara and customs... by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    It's late and maybe it's just my brain failing to do the math right, but how is 10% of 1026-400 == 26??

    1026 - 400 = 626. 10% = 62.6 ($63)?

    Of course, I'm probably wrong and I'm making an ass of myself. Please explain anyway.

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
  120. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by dvdeug · · Score: 2

    "about 1% of the population (of anywhere) had an IQ above 120"

    Try your statistics again. IQ's fall on a bell curve with a standard deviation of 15, so 95% percent of the population is between 70 and 130. This means that 2.5% of the population has an IQ above 130.

    Also, "(of anywhere)" assumes a population that hasn't been prebiased. The population of the US counts; the population of Slashdot, however, is selected in part because the audience has an interest in technical subjects, meaning that you would expect that the average IQ of a Slashdot reader would be above 100; the 15% of the population with an IQ below 85 will probably find little reason to stick around.

  121. The saddest part about the Wal-Mart PC... by weave · · Score: 2
    I can't believe it. The saddest part about this Wal-Mart PC is that it costs the same as the damn video card (gf4, ti4600) that I bought last night (just to play that damn Morrowind game...)

    I should be shot (and I will be shot if someone tells my wife how much I spent on it.)

    1. Re:The saddest part about the Wal-Mart PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh! You better do what I did. Get a P.O. Box, and have 1 credit card company send it's monthly statements there. I keep the card stashed in my toolbox, which is of course stashed in the trunk of the car. It's the only way I've been able to make my electronics purchases seem resonable with a bogus price quote during the usual how much did you spend inquisition.

      Now if can just figure out a way to get rid of that damn cast iron skillet...... ;-)

  122. Simpsons, Wal-Mart by dswan69 · · Score: 1

    It is about time the Simpsons was put out to pasture as they have clearly run out of ideas.

    So to get a clean PC we have to buy from scum like Wal-Mart? Thanks, but I'd rather my money went to scum like MS instead.

    What is Harlan Ellison's problem? Was he born a moron? Or just been falling on his head a lot?

    1. Re:Simpsons, Wal-Mart by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      Harlan Ellison's "problem," is the same as it's always been. He's a cantankerous, paranoid, horny old man. (some would argue that he wasn't an old man 50 years ago, but I disagree). He has loudly and vociferously shouted his opinion from the rooftops for decades, and has an absolute compulsion about the use/control/reproduction of his writings.

      He's also one of the finest authors of the 20th century--probably in the top five.

      As for the Simpson's, I agree--what the hell have they been DOING lately??!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  123. Why are you so fucking anal? by @madeus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your post was one long anal rant and uttterly fucking pointless.

    The origional review was just fine IMHO you added nothing of value in all your abusive and comments, which attempted to make something out of nothing.

    All the points you made were FUCKING OBVIOUS given the context and were never the less useful even if YOU are too short sighted to see why.

    So heres one from me: FUCK OFF and stop wasting bandwidth, fucking Karma Whores *grumble*.....

    1. Re:Why are you so fucking anal? by BJH · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, at least I didn't get modded down as a troll...

      ...and a big FUCK OFF to you too, sweetheart.

    2. Re:Why are you so fucking anal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, at least I didn't get modded down as a troll...

      Look again, assmunch. And there's more where those came from.

      ~~~

  124. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by reflective+recursion · · Score: 2

    Ummm. Wal-Mart moved probably less than 1/4th mile away into a Super Wal-Mart here, and now an Old Navy and other things are using the old Wal-Mart building. They were in the building almost as soon as the new Super Wal-Mart opened. I don't know where you come up with this stuff. Infact, the entire building had been remodeled to accomodate the new tenets (walls torn down, new ones put up, etc.).

    --
    Dijkstra Considered Dead
  125. Sure, 486 had PCI by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
    I have a 486 motherboard with ISA, PCI, and VESA Local Bus slots. They weren't that rare in the brief period between the introduction of PCI and the effective death of the 486.

    I even have a Pentium board with a VLB slot. Now that's rare; the VLB bus was basically an extension of the 486's internal CPU bus. It required quite a bit of bridge logic to make it work with a Pentium.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  126. Fox can't cancel the Simpsons ... by notaspy · · Score: 1

    where would /.ers get their clever sigs from?
    That '70s Show??

    --
    hi!
  127. microtel winmodems by room101 · · Score: 2

    Microtel winmodems work fine in Linux.

    Maybe someone should have investigated this before raising a stink about it.

    yeah, they aren't great modems, but I bought one (got it for free with the rebate at compusa). I put it in my linux machine and downloaded a kernal module for it. It works pretty well.

    just fyi

    --
    room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
    (they always break you eventually)
    1. Re:microtel winmodems by nagora · · Score: 2

      Microtel winmodems work fine in Linux.

      Maybe someone should have investigated this before raising a stink about it.

      Some do, the specific one in the machines did not, as was mentioned in the original review and discussion below it.

      Maybe you should have investigated this before raising a stink about it.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  128. Umm, no. by schon · · Score: 1

    apparently the issue of contributory copyright infringement would have gone to trial but for the fact that AOL met one of the "safe-harbor" provisions of the DMCA.

    This is (probably) true. Ellison misunderstands technology so much that he could have had it go to court. And he would have lost.

    Usenet is apparently saved by the DMCA.

    Umm, this is a VERY big leap.

    The DMCA's "safe harbour" provisions in no way "saved" Usenet. All they did was provide a short-cut.

    If the safe harbour provisions didn't exist, Ellison would have taken AOL to court, and would have lost - because in order to be found guilty of contributory copyright infringement, you must have knowledge that infringement is taking place.. this implies that AOL must know the copyright status of every piece of information on Usenet.

    So (continuing the assumption that safe harbour didn't exist) when Ellison lost, it would have created a legal precident.. and effectively done the same thing.

    The DMCA did not "save" Usenet, because even if the DMCA didn't exist, the end result would have been the same. It would just have taken longer.

    1. Re:Umm, no. by po8 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's why I wrote "apparently". There was a triable issue of fact, so no certainty that the court would reach the conclusion you suggest. But it seems pretty likely to me also.

  129. Re:Akihabara & Singapore by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Globalism is real. I found about the same prices at the Akihabara as I did Kyoto as I did in S'pore's "Electronic Malls." as I have in Fry's. It is fun to see so much consumer stuff in one place, but don't expect any super deals.

    I think Douglas Adams had a line something like. "How come duty-free shops can sell things so much cheeper, but don't?"

    OK, so I travel too much and don't go to the right tourest traps like I should.

  130. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Prune+Whip · · Score: 1

    "It is my understanding" So again, no proof. If you can't back up what you say, then don't say it. At least cite a reputable source or something... Just saying " It is my understanding" doesn't cut it.

  131. Re: Hacking at the ties that bind by phaze3000 · · Score: 2
    Actually there were later 486 motherboards with PCI slots.

    Many 802.11b PCI cards are PCI 2.2 only though, which no 486 will be (in fact only quite recent boards are).

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  132. Needlessly acid rebuff by johnjay · · Score: 1

    I wasn't terribly interested in the article until I read your vituperative tirade. Having seen it myself, I must say you are needlessly spiteful and arrogant. The man wrote a throw-away piece, for the amusement of passersby, on a shopping excursion he took in Japan. There is no weight of authority in his description; he admits that he is an uninformed, Anglophone tourist. For those of us who have never been to Akihabara, or any of Japan, it is an innocent diversion.

    While your critique of his narrative was interesting and informative, its tone was certainly unnecessary. You happen to have the benefit of experience but used this only for your own vainglorious self-adulation. The acerbity and dudgeon of your jeremiad betrayed a stunted and tawdry sense of worth.

    1. Re:Needlessly acid rebuff by Things+To+Do+Tuesday · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you and other readers realize by now that you've replied to the wrong person. So verbally adroit, and yet so careless!

      Now, I have things to do Tuesday.

      1. Call mom from a Wal-Modem
      2. Misquote a slashdot poster and accept Culpability for it

    2. Re:Needlessly acid rebuff by johnjay · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. I replied to you.

    3. Re:Needlessly acid rebuff by johnjay · · Score: 1

      Damn, you're right after all; my apologies. What you're doing is sort of funny. I guess it's my fault for reading at Level 4.

  133. no, not FUD by geekoid · · Score: 2

    "unsupported by linux is pure FUD"
    FUD:
    Fear
    Uncertianty(sp?)
    Doubt

    In the context of the story, saying Linux doesn't support winmodems is a mistake, not FUD.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  134. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by geekoid · · Score: 2

    'their globalisation tactics'

    Thats is a poor statement for someone to make, and I can see why it would confuse somebody.

    What they are referring to is wal-marts tactic to "lower the bar" for overseas companies.
    Manufactures of wal-mart goods get paid less, and work more then any other manufacture in order to get wal-mart prices. this forces other large companies to do the same or go out of business, some companies have chose to go out of business. This is the big reason on why Kmart has gone under.
    Wal-mart also red lines the books of people they buy from, forcing them to cut "uneeded fat". Like health care.
    Wal-mart treats its employees like dirt. You have to be there 2 years before your eligable for health care, then it costs so much most of there emplyees can not afford it.
    Wal-Mart says it has more full time employees the any other retailer, but they consider 28 hour full time.
    For ever 2 people wal-mart hires, three are put out of work in the local community.
    I probably didn't present this very well, for that, I'm sorry.
    go to NLC and search for Wal-mart, Or any company. Please read the about NLC page so thye can explain what there about.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  135. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn right. This is slashdot. We don't allow any posting of unfounded opinion.

  136. Boycotting Harlan Ellison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, this makes me mad enough to return that giant omnibus edition of Ellison's stories to the store I got it from.

    Oh wait, I shoplifted it from that store. Never mind.

  137. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    Actually, there's a Wal-Mart near me that, several years ago, moved about 200 yards away into a new building. Their old space is now a Big Lots.

    For those not familiar, Big Lots buys up loads of crap that no one wants and sells it at fairly cheap prices. They have a smattering of stuff from groceries, household products, furniture, toys, etc. If you can find something you want, you can usually get a good deal. I guess Wal-Mart doesn't think of Big Lots as competition, really.

    It is sad to see all the K-Marts closing around us, but K-Mart could have prevented their demise if they had tried about six years ago. All they had to do was keep their prices competitive with Wal-Mart and carry stuff people wanted. And maybe clean up their stores - all the K-Marts around here are 20+ years old and look like it, most of the Wal-Marts are 5-10 years old but look brand new.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  138. Re:Stay away from Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crying "monopolist!" while getting whupped in the marketplace is almost as easy as crying "witch!" when getting whupped farming.

    Hey, what is an analogy that makes sense doing on Slashdot?

  139. Wait a minute, Ebert... by attercoppe · · Score: 1

    OK, asshole, he wasn't *complaining* about half the stuff you berated him for. And he didn't claim to be an expert, either. He was simply relating his experience on his one trip there. Give him a break. This was actually very interesting to someone like me, who would like to go, but may very well never get to.

    --
    Hardware Geeks Do It With The Covers Off!