Slashdot Mirror


Smart Cards Vulnerable to Photo-Flash Attacks?

belphegor writes "Researchers at the University of Cambridge have found a way to use a camera flash and microscope to extract data from smart cards. " Notable because its apparently relatively simple to do and really throws a monkey wrench into a variety of businesses that use smart cards to store important data.

214 comments

  1. DIE BITCH!!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    HI NATE

    1. Re:DIE BITCH!!!!!!!!!! by Burritos · · Score: -1

      First Homer Simpson had a helper monkey. Now the dude off of Malcom in the MIddle had a helper monkey. Who is better?

  2. i just got in by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: -1

    and walked into an early post

    not first, but hell, it's monday

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  3. They should have used the iButton by swagr · · Score: 4, Informative

    It immediatly destroys it's internal data when forced open.
    Here's the link.

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    1. Re:They should have used the iButton by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      The iButton has some weird user/developer license (I'm sure some smart cards arn't any better). Also some iButtons use Java, and that brings on another layer of lame licensing. That's why one person I know won't mess with them. I however think they're way cool. I really like the ones that work as a key to open doors, and then you get one of those iButton rings. It's all James Bondish :)

    2. Re:They should have used the iButton by swagr · · Score: 1

      Also, you can download the API and IDE for iButton development for free, and the actual iButtons and adapters are cheap enough for hobbyists to afford.

      --

      -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    3. Re:They should have used the iButton by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's easy enough to open an iButton without destroying it. I seem to recall you just keep it in a pressurized N2 atmosphere while cracking the case, and it won't even realize that it has been opened.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    4. Re:They should have used the iButton by arkanes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, because I have this pressurised N2 atmosphere sitting over here in my basement...

    5. Re:They should have used the iButton by swagr · · Score: 2

      Well, the story aimed to show how easy it was to get data off a smart card.

      So far we've determined it's somewhat more difficult to simply open an iButton.

      How do we get at the data?

      --

      -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    6. Re:They should have used the iButton by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Yeah, because I have this pressurised N2 atmosphere sitting over here in my basement...

      I tried building that. I'm 70% of the way there.

    7. Re:They should have used the iButton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've been to his basement and I don't think he is using N2. I thought N2 was odorless

    8. Re:They should have used the iButton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Yeah, because I have this pressurised N2 atmosphere sitting over here in my basement...
      >I tried building that. I'm 70% of the way there.

      Then you're going in the wrong direction... Air starts out about 79% N2...

    9. Re:They should have used the iButton by spudgun_dave · · Score: 1

      So do smart cards!

      Thats the point of them, you cannot retrieve the secret key, as opening up the hardware on the card destroys it. Previously the only known way to brute force crack the key (in threory - there are other implementation specific exploits - remember ITV digital!) required very very expensive equipment and that doesn't work all the time. This is a revelation because now you can view the secret key for onlt 30 bucks.

      But I quite like the look of these iButton things too.

  4. Slashdot Beatitudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    And seeing the multitudes, He went up unto the mountain: and when He was set, his disciples came unto him: And He opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,

    "Blessed are the poor in threshold: for theirs is the Kingdom of the Page-Lengthening and Page-Widening Posts.

    "Blessed are they that mourn the death of *BSD: for they shall be comforted with an ultradense Linux server from VA Linux, now sold by California Digital Corporation.

    "Blessed are the posters of smug one-liners: for they shall inherit an Account Capped at 50.

    "Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after The First Post: for they shall have the Third or Fourth Post.

    "Blessed are the karma whores: for they shall obtain "Score: 5, Insightful".

    "Blessed are those who dismiss out-of-hand: for they shall fail to see the Point of the Original Post.

    "Blessed are those who seek to associate themselves with the latest techno-fad: for they shall be called 3L33T for at least Another Half Hour.

    "Blessed are they which are persecuted for their own self-righteousness' sake: for theirs is the Kingdom of "Ask Slashdot".

    "Blessed are the over-eager, who believe that Open Source is a social movement heralding the rise of a new generation: for they shall not realize that There Are No Sacred Cows.

    "Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for the sake of your Favorite Operating System.

    "Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in Heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

    THIS IS THE WORD OF THE LORD

    1. Re:Slashdot Beatitudes by YoPt · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Don't you mean this is the Word of the "SysGods"?

  5. smartcards have always been lacking by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    there is very little tamper protection on smartcards due to their flimsy construction. you cant make a rapid zeroization system on something that isn't rigid and tough enough to be driven over repeatedly by a car or take the huge amount of abuse the human carrier provides every day.

    except... dallas semiconductor long ago created the ibutton that is more secure and better than any smartcard..

    (I know I sound like a broken record, but ibuttons are way better and cooler than any smartcard, and you as a home hacker can use them!)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by hagardtroll · · Score: 1

      In the article... More widely used in Europe than in the United States, the cards have long been promoted as the key to a cashless society as well as... Whats wrong with Cash? I like cash. Cash is good.

    2. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      OK, so smart cards are not tamper resistant. I don't see that any attack based around stealing a smart card is anything to worry about, assuming the card itself only stores dumb information like a sum of money or an id number.

      Guess what?! Criminals can read the information from a credit card using nothing more sophisticated than their eyes! Does this render credit cards an appalling security risk? No, because when it gets stolen you report it and cancel the card.

      Now, if someone figures out a way to _write_ to the smart card to people can top up sums of money or whatever, that's a problem. Also, if the smartcard stores data that's useful in itself - say your real naem and address, or other bank account numbers, or what have you, then you certainly don't want that being read by someone else.

      --
      ----- .sig: file not found
    3. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by JonWan · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with Cash? I like cash. Cash is good.

      The men in the Black Helicopters can't track you as easy.

    4. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by SignoffTheSourcerer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is really nothing new, many microcontrollers (like those used in smartcards) are vulnerable to different attacks, clock-glitches voltage reversals/spikes which may unlock their security features. Many of them are normally readable but are 'locked' by a fuse. This fuse may be reset by removing the UV protective coating and erase the card as an EPROM (this will ofcourse also destroy any data you wanted to read). There are however methods circumventing this, like using micro-film as masks for the UV-eraser, or using micro-probes to directly alter the bus. Many cards do not even have real protection, like the european pay-phone cards, all they are is a serial-EPROM which is burned a bit at a time for each credit, but they're fused so if you erase them (UV-wise) they will not allow you to re-program the low-area of the EPROM, but don't worry, just use som other blank card and copy it onto that.

      --
      Ordo Militum Unix.
    5. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by hagardtroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't be so sure about that. Take any dollar bill and visit the web site WheresGeorge and see where it has been.

    6. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Um, the problem is when you have cryptographic information on the card.

      Like a private RSA key and certificate. There are many companies that use that for authentication and encryption. The Navy's CAC card for example. Every people in the Navy will have one. You wouldn't want someone to be able to steal your private key off of your card.

    7. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      Erm, you do realise that only works if other people who have had that bill actually go to that site and enter the information, don't you?

      It's not as if the MiBs are activly tracking your bill, you know!

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    8. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by kris · · Score: 2

      Only that the iButton from Dallas Semiconductor already has been broken several years ago by ... right, the very same Ross Anderson and Markus Kuhn.

      Kristian

    9. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      I'm not falling for your disinformation, you NRO patsy!

      All discerning people realize that, although it is passed off as a harmless lark, "Where's George" is something much more sinister!

      &ltfnord!&gt
      Starting in 1997, MKULTRA-NG mind-controlled puppets have been indoctrinated to access the "Where's George" site when the recieve a dollar bill with the appropriate command coding on the back. Consciously, they think that they are entering in the Federal Reserve serial number from the bill. But subconsciously, they are entering their MKGUID, which uniquely identifies the MK sleeper agent.

      This allows the Illuminati to easily track their agents in the field. If they have new orders for the erstwhile Manchurian candidate, they will be routed to a seperate website with where they will find their updated briefing material.
      &lt/fnord!&gt

      Of course, the proceeding was totall bullshit, and actually part of the insidious NWO CONTELINPRO program.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    10. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2
      DirecTV has what they claim a billion dollar lose due to pirates, hacking the nice little smart cards. (First the F, now H and HU series, soon to be replaced by the P4 series, which probably isn't hacked, yet....) Writing isn't important, if you can completely dump the card then you can make yourself a cardless emulation system on a PC. (The holy grail of directTv pirates...)

      I'm sure they are going to take notice of this technology, if they haven't already, because I am certain there are people on the other side that will be cracking open DTV smart cards to use this method very soon...

    11. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Istanbul, Turkey... 12M+ city. If what I see is right (on that website), that iButton takes care of near whole transportation system here. In busses, metro, sea. There wasn't a single incident since years.

      Its named "Akbil" (Smart Ticket), in demos they showed huge cars&stuff driven over them, nothing happened.

      Oh btw, to remind how widely they are used they are, its like 80% iButton vs 20% regular tickets.

    12. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by WNight · · Score: 2

      But... But... You do realize that there are secret IR scanners installed in most stores around the states, reading the serial numbers (which are printed with an IR reflective ink) on all our cash. This is the reasons that stores tend to use incandescent lights near the cash registers, to provide more short-wave IR (the more reflective) to increase visibility for the scanners.

      They suplement this by using facial recognition AI software. This was one of the first products of the AI revolution, but unfortunately in order to keep this secret for government use they've had to supress almost all research in these areas. We really could have had human-level AI by now if it hadn't been appropriated by the NSA.

      Of course, this is just a spoof of a paranoid rant... right? :)

    13. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by pwagland · · Score: 3, Informative
      OK, so smart cards are not tamper resistant. I don't see that any attack based around stealing a smart card is anything to worry about, assuming the card itself only stores dumb information like a sum of money or an id number.

      And herein lies the problem. Smart cards don't only store "dumb information". In particular, from the article (which I assume you read?):

      Some of the information stored in the card is in the form of a number composed of ones and zeros that cryptographers refer to as a "private key." That key is part of a two-key system that is used to encode and decode information. The security of such systems is compromised if the private key is revealed.

      In particular, here in the Netherlands (and I believe elsewhere in Europe), you can get online access to your account (with most banks) by using your ATM card. This is accomplished since each ATM card has a smart card on the card. If you can get the secret key out of the card, then you can login to someone elses banking site. No you can't do this with the card alone, since you need to know the cards PIN to access the smart card functionality.

    14. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can read a credit card number right off of the card. And in other news, your credit card is slightly more secure than leaving your money unattended on a sidewalk in Manhattan. We have just gotten used to a very convenient, amazingly insecure system that works well enough.

      Maybe out next attempt should be better.

      -B

    15. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      Do you have any links that describe how to use an iButton for access control, such as activating relays for door strikes, garage door openers, etc? I looked all over the iButton web site and couldn't find any hard details on how to go about setting something like this up. I think it would be cool to replace all locks with iButton readers (and at ~$15 a pop, why not?!) - front door, garage, even the keyholes in your car could be replaced with a reader that would disarm the alarm system and unlock the door. Buy an iButton ring to wear and never have to carry keys again.

      Any ideas on how to get started with this??

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    16. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by anotherone · · Score: 1
      There's a lady who works at my father's shop who has tried to get dad to buy a lead safe to keep the cash in because she honestly believes that the little black strip sewn into >$5 can be read from a satillite.

      And she's actually pretty sane, otherwise... of course she does collect concrete goose clothing.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    17. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Criminals can read the information from a credit card using nothing more sophisticated than their eyes!

      Well we can always outlaw eyes. Or at the very least, require certified security technologies to be implanted in them to prevent theft. The SSSCA/CBDTPA is only a beginning. ;)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    18. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Card systems on the continent are far more secure than here in the U.K. Here you only need (for ordering over the phone and web) the number and expiry date. Although some cards do have something similar to a pin you sometimes have to enter too.

    19. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by nomel · · Score: 1

      People have found how to write data...

    20. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Anyone with a smart card reader (retailers/universities/etc) can read and write a smart card.

      It's just a blob of data.

      Each institution (hopefully) has the said data encrypted and has some tamper checking on it.

    21. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I don't see that any attack based around stealing a smart card is anything to worry about

      Then you don't understand the problem. In many cases they don't care of you steal a hundred smart cards. That gets you a few thousand phone minutes or one month of free cable for a hundred people. The cards run out of minutes or expire at the end of the month and you have nothing. Petty theft.

      The problem is that the smart cards contain an encryption key. The key unlocks the entire systems. It grants an unlimited number of people unlimited access to phonecalls/cable-service, or whatever. In other words w3 0wn j00 !

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    22. Re:smartcards have always been lacking by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      You mean like leting some 1337 h4x0r walking into your house, taking your TV and whatever and driving away in your car...
      "One Ring to rule them all" indeed...

  6. Shouldn't they be arrested? by Wiseazz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where's Adobe when you need them?

    --
    My sig sucks.
  7. oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'll lose all of my personal attempts at recreating goatse man

  8. DIE AC!!!!!!!! by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    I claim this FP for the CLIT

    DIE you AC SCUM!

    Troll Power!
    Troll Power!
    Troll Power!

    1. Re:DIE AC!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      My neighbor's dog has a 5 inch CLIT

  9. as expected by tps12 · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I think all of us at slashdot knew that something like this would happen sooner or later. The whole concept of smart cards is fatally flawed, in that it relies on such provably insecure methods as security through obscurity and planned obsolescence to provide "security".

    Not to mention the fact that they invade privacy. In the Constitution, in Article 4, where Congress is given the power and duty to take a decannual census, it is specifically stated that, "Beyond such Actions and Surveys as are required in the Construction of said Census, any and all Inquiries by Congress into the Private Matters of the Lives of Citizens is Therefore Banned." Pretty strong language.

    But I guess that's what our forefathers fought for back in '76. I sure would hate to try to explain this to them.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:as expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Beyond such Actions and Surveys as are required in the Construction of said Census, any and all Inquiries by Congress into the Private Matters of the Lives of Citizens is Therefore Banned."

      Too bad that doesn't apply to the IRS.

    2. Re:as expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well and good, but the Constitution has no such language. I salute you for a troll subtle enough that most people wouldn't pick up on it, however.

      Troll rating:

      First paragraph sounds reasonable and authoritative: 1 point
      Factual statement about privacy invasion: 1 point
      Reference to the constitution with the word "decannual": 1 point
      A spurious "quote" from the Constitution that only a slashdotter could have written: -1 point
      Cliche'd ending sentence about our "forefathers": -1 point

      While you should be proud that you have a troll rating in positive territory, that's still not enough to send you over the edge and spark a flame war. Try again, next time.

  10. IT's only money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    well, not exactly. does any1 know how many cc #s have been filched doo to M$ IIS security "enhancemeNTs"? know? does any1 know why ecommerce is practically dead in the wwwater? IEaaaggghhh.ofInvasion

  11. "Smart Cards" by DarkZero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh my God! You mean the security device that corporations have been hailing as super ultra mega secure and completely impenetrable is easily circumvented?

    SHOCK! HORROR! SURPRISE! Yawn...

    1. Re:"Smart Cards" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today smart card realized they were just dumb. Those that bought the smart cards realized they were dumb too. The problem is the way technology has been peddled the last twenty years instead of making a great product they all try to make a quick buck. The fix is to demand that hardware manufacturers open source their schemetics and those who buy hardware are giving the source code so they can review it and fix the problems as they find them. We have GPL Software well lets have GPL Hardware. Smart cards are dumb just like Microsoft is crapware. Your boss is really a dumbshit as if you did not know. If you still do not understand go read Dilbert!

  12. SMILE!! by Indras · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your data's on Candid Camera (tm)!

    --
    The speed of time is one second per second.
  13. No worries, we'll just pass more laws... by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All that needs to happen is for makers of smart cards to send money to Congresscritters to pass laws against smart card "circumvention devices" and have anyone making, selling or posessing a flash-based camera arrested.

    Remember, when a security technology is comprimised you don't improve the technology, you outlaw anything that exposes its weakness.

    1. Re:No worries, we'll just pass more laws... by nolife · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This happened in the past with the padding of the cell phone industry. Analog mode cell phones send clear audio over the air in roughly the 868-890 MHz range. To protect the cell phone industry, the government passed a law in 1994 to prevent the sale of consumer radio scanners from receiving these frequencies. That worked for a while but many scanners were easily 'hacked' to get this region back. In 1997 the law was modified/changed to make it illegal to modify a scanner and companies had to produce scanners that were tamper proof.

      These air bands were open to public ears for decades before the cell phone industry came to life. They chose to use "plain text" audio for analog transmissions to save money with no regard for your privacy. The government stepped in to bail them out when scanning these frequencies became popular and to give the public a false sense of security so they would buy more of them and keep the cell phone industry going strong.

      It is also illegal to listen to analog cordless phones (46-49MHz/900MHz) but there is no law preventing the scanners from receiving these bands. I guess the cordless guys could not drum up enough soft money to get that through.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  14. How they did it by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2, Redundant
    The relevant part of the article:

    They were able to expose the circuit to the light by scraping most of the protective coating from the surface of the microprocessor circuit that is embedded in each smart card.

    With more study, the researchers were able to focus the flash on individual transistors within the chip by beaming the flash through a standard laboratory microscope.

    "We used duct tape to fix the photoflash lamp on the video port of a Wentworth Labs MP-901 manual probing station," they wrote in their paper.

    By sequentially changing the values of the transistors used to store information, they were able to "reverse engineer" the memory address map, allowing them to extract the secret information contained in the smart card.

    It's not prostitution if your karma is 50.

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    1. Re:How they did it by The+Salamander · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's not prostitution if your karma is 50.

      No, then you're just a cheap slut.

    2. Re:How they did it by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      It's not prostitution if your karma is 50.

      It's called a freebie.

    3. Re:How they did it by tjhayes · · Score: 1

      Duct Tape? Duct Tape?

  15. Trust us, OUR cards ARE smart... by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Alex Giakoumis... said his company had built defensive measures into its products that would make them invulnerable to such an attack. However, he said he was unwilling to be specific about the nature of the security system."

    However, it is speculated that the card contains material that can obscure the flash, literally achieving "security through obscurity."

    1. Re:Trust us, OUR cards ARE smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      However, it is speculated that the card contains material


      (Following up a humorous post with facts. Oh well.)

      Correct. If you have a spare metal layer, you put that in as an unbroken power rail. Very little light will pass the higher-numbered connective layers.

      If someone tries to remove such a layer, they are looking at a daunting task, since they are also removing the power to the circuit. I am surprised they haven't taken the cost of putting in that extra layer already.

      That still leaves attacks which probe the charge stored on the floating gates of the flash memories. They are significantly more costly, though.
    2. Re:Trust us, OUR cards ARE smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alex must be a friend of Bill :) His products must just as good as Microsoft. Of course the majority of people are stupid fucks who will buy shit and he will make a billion or two just like Bill Gates. Tech Support Call "Help me my smart card is really dumb and trashed information can you help me shit this guy at xyz company said it was just as reliable as Microsoft Windows geez I wonder if the card is running Windows Embedded and BSOD"

    3. Re: Trust us, OUR cards ARE smart... by Luke+Marsden · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be.. "security through opacity"? ;-)

    4. Re: Trust us, OUR cards ARE smart... by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

      Maybe "mendacity through opacity?"
      Or "confusion via occlusion?"
      Or "protection by misdirection?"

  16. Now I just got to figure out by jesseraf · · Score: 1

    Now I just got to figure out how to add money to my laundry card. That thing has eaten more money than I've used on the machines...

    1. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      usually those type of systems only keep an ID on your card, and keep the ammount in a computer somewhere. So doing anything to the card won't effect the ammount of money linked to it.

    2. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah ha, a money laundering scheme, eh?

    3. Re:Now I just got to figure out by iuyterw · · Score: 1
      How exactly would that work? I don't think the washing machine in my apartment building dials in when I wash my clothes.

      I don't really know dick about smart cards, but common sense would tell you that any card system for laundry would keep track of the monetary value on the card itself.

      I'd be interested to know how the system works if it doesn't.

    4. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Well how do you get money on the card? If you do it in the same machine that that machine probably keeps track of the ID money information. It's very rare for the card itself to keep the ammount of money on the card.

    5. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we had smart cards in our student ID's at the University of Arizona and they used both systems. They kept some cash value on the card, and your ID was stored on the card for the meal plans. I think the maximum value was $100 on the card, just so you couldn't lose *that* much if you lost the card.

    6. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      One place I lived the laundry machines took a little plastic card with a black pattern on them. You stuck it in the machine, and it melted the card. That way noone could retrieve them. Only downside was the only way you could get more cards was to buy them off of the rooming house owner or the RA. If the RA was out all night, you were SOL and had to find a regular coin laundry.

      --

      Gorkman

    7. Re:Now I just got to figure out by jesseraf · · Score: 1

      these are real smart cards actually. It'd be hard to network a bunch of laundry machines in several locations across a large campus together.

    8. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Twylite · · Score: 2

      You may want to read up on EMV. It is a cooperative initiative between Visa, Mastercard and Europay, and is set to roll out (region dependant) by 2005. Credit cards will be phased out soon after (by the aforementioned companies refusing to accept liability to fraud on non-EMV transactions).

      EMV provides for online and offline transaction approval, mostly based on the size of the transaction and the running size of offline transactions since the last online one.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    9. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really that hard. In fact, that's what most schools have been doing for quite a few years.

    10. Re:Now I just got to figure out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of the machines that worked with those plastic tabs were susceptible to the "string through the end" hack. Eg. poke a small hole in one end, and string some dental floss through. Push the tab slowly into the machine until it the machine starts, and then pull the string (not too hard or you'll break the floss). It's not foolproof, as some machines won't let you pull it back out, but for the most part it works. Just keep trying different machines until you find one that works.

  17. duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We used duct tape to fix the photoflash lamp on the video port of a..."

    Is there anything in this world that cannot be fixed with duct tape? :-)

    1. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duct tape will not stick to brick, stone or concrete.

  18. Not very shocking news. Really. by krtek · · Score: 2

    A few years ago I was told about similar technique involving elctron beam (or something like this). Generally, physical access to anything means full access to all contained infomation. Old security principle.

    On the one hand it means no equipment may be trusted since it comes to customer's hands. On the second, I see no problem if I can rip the data which belongs to me (I know, it's generally not the case when it comes to SC). Smart Cards always have been security by obscurity for me. This lesson the industry never learns, I'm afraid.

  19. So let me get this straight, by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lemme see if I understand right. Reverse engineer hardware to show its inherit ineffectualness -- that's ok. Reverse engineer software to show its inherit ineffectualness -- that's illegal.

    Ok, just making sure.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight, by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      Insight into who has spent more money in congress eh? Personally, I think these companies need to spend less time filling the pockets of congress and try to actually produce a (more) secure, (better) quality product. Then they probably wouldn't have to suck off congress all the time.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change your sig - went there to see what's up and got told you're rebuilding it :(

    3. Re:So let me get this straight, by SecGreen · · Score: 1

      Wait, I was planning on using SmartCards to store and distribute my copyrighted intellectual property! Where are the DMCA police when you need them...

      --
      Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
  20. Easy solution: Nanotubes by MontyP · · Score: 4, Funny

    All they need to do is intertwine single wall carbon based nano tubes throughout the memory. When the camera flash hits the memory, the memory will self destruct.

    --


    There is no .sig
    1. Re:Easy solution: Nanotubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As always, if you or any member of your team is captured, the IMF will deny any knowledge of your mission. This smart card will self-destruct when a flash bulb goes off near it. Or if you leave it in the sun. Or if you use a remote control too close. And don't strike a matc ..."

    2. Re:Easy solution: Nanotubes by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      Moderators, The parent is not funny, it is insightfull or interesting. The suggestion is a serious one and there is a good chance that it would work.

    3. Re:Easy solution: Nanotubes by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Moderators, The parent is not funny

      Not only was it funny, it was hystrerical! :)

      it is insightfull or interesting. The suggestion is a serious one and there is a good chance that it would work.

      *Maybe* but I really doubt it. For starters the nanotubes only explode in an oxygen atmosphere.

      The real problem is that what you are doing is kind of like building a tank and every time one gets blown up you add 1 square inch of armor at the spot that got hit.

      I'd wager it wouldn't be very hard to modify the flash-bulb technique to avoid triggering the nanotubes. I bet filtering the light wavelengths would do the trick.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  21. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Isn't this circumventing a protection system? Its only a matter of time before these guys are arrested.

    1. Re:DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked with Ross Anderson for a spell a little over 10 years ago, and even then, everybody said
      it was just a matter of time before he got arrested.
      I doubt the DMCA will even slow him down.

    2. Re:DMCA by Neill_Smith · · Score: 1

      Except that they live/work in the UK, and the DMCA doesn't apply here. (yet, they're working on it....)

      --
      http://hal.trinhall.cam.ac.uk/~nrs27
    3. Re:DMCA by nomel · · Score: 1

      No, there was no copyright protection...

      COPYRIGHT protection is only illegal...

      The data on the card most likely will not be copyright...

    4. Re:DMCA by nomel · · Score: 1

      How is does this fall under the DMCA!?

      They are not circumventing ANY protective measures that guard against copyright data or are copyright themselves...a piece of plastic that covers the components is NOT a protective measure...

      Thats like saying that your case on your computer is a protective meause against hackers...

  22. At least they need to steal them first by eet23 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article:
    They were able to expose the circuit to the light by scraping most of the protective coating from the surface of the microprocessor circuit that is embedded in each smart card.

    With more study, the researchers were able to focus the flash on individual transistors within the chip by beaming the flash through a standard laboratory microscope.

    Could they make the cards so that removing the coating destroyed the chip?

  23. Easy to do? by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, maybe everyone else on slashdot has a full clean room. I mean, it could be a possibility. But when I hear phrases like "focusing light on a single transistor" and "Wentworth Labs MP-901 manual probing station" I tend not to think of simple or easy to do. I'm not saying you couldn't hack one, I'm just asking what % of criminals are going to have access to a "manual probing station"?

    --
    Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    1. Re:Easy to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just asking what % of criminals are going to have access to a "manual probing station"?

      Are you still talking about about Smartcards?

      I guess this means that those UFO's will start leaving our rednecks alone and start taking our smart cards!

    2. Re:Easy to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about criminals. Worry about the board collage kids with access to full lab setups. Some times it only takes the info from one smart card to do some damage. I mean if this process can be used on Direct-tv HU-cards will start seeing emulators any day now.

    3. Re:Easy to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I mean, if you could read the data while you were passing the guy on the street or sitting outside their building, that would be one thing. But having to scrape the coating, put it under a microscope in a clean room, focus a flash on each transistor, and reverse engineer the data? Come on guys, this sounds to me like a whole lot of worry over nothing! Not many hackers are going to have access to a Wentworth Labs MP-901 manual probing station. How much does something like that cost anyway?

      jds

    4. Re:Easy to do? by jelizondo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not easy but if it was it there would not be any money on breaking them. For criminals, the way it works is like what they do with current credit cards: some criminal outfit with the money to buy the talent and equipment needed starts producing them in mass and the neighboorhood hudloom uses them.

      Last year there was a spat of cases where waiters and other salespeople had been coerced into swiping customer's credit cards through a "special device" that reads the mag track and stores it. Then the device is handled back to low-life who in turns delivers it to someone who in turn reads the data and produces "genuine" credit cards for use by criminals.

      It's not easy, but if there is money on doing it you can bet it will be done.

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    5. Re:Easy to do? by saider · · Score: 2, Informative

      Much of this can be had at auctions. Many companies upgrade their equipment and shove their older, but still functional equipment out the back door to anyone who will haul it off. I know one guy who does this and makes a fairly good living. I remember he had a cell tower tranciever once. I'm sure some people would know what to do with that, but I don't.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    6. Re:Easy to do? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      I'm just asking what % of criminals are going to have access to a "manual probing station"?

      What % of car thieves have access to a fully-functional chop shop? The point is, if there's money in it, somebody will put together the resources necessary to break these things in quantity, and the pickpockets will just go to them.

    7. Re:Easy to do? by uberdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're criminals. Why wouldn't they just steal one?

    8. Re:Easy to do? by symbolic · · Score: 2

      If people are willing to go to the expense and risk of cooking meth, I'm convinced that there are few things a sufficiently motivated person won't attempt.

    9. Re:Easy to do? by karlm · · Score: 2
      They're criminals. Why wouldn't they just steal one?

      I know you're just trying to be funny, but for the benefit of the 14 year olds out there, there's more than one kind of criminal. Some kinds of criminals are not willing to do some things. Most criminals even have morals and justify thier crimes in their own heads and are not willing to do other kinds of crime. I think it's probably mucheasier for a criminal to convince himself/herself that credit card fraud is okay vs. breaking and entering being okay. I wouldn't be surprised if many /.

      People who steal satelite TV are criminals. Why don't theyjust go out and mug people for the satelite TV money instead? It's a question of morals. 99% of criminals have them.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    10. Re:Easy to do? by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      Ummm, the % that is most likely to want to steal the most (having just spent enough money to crack the smart cards). This gets into the same argument the US Treasury once had to ask: would you rather have 5 people counterfeiting $10000, or 10000 people counterfeiting $5. It isn't an easy question to answer.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  24. Smart, very smart? by KDENCE · · Score: 0

    So much for technology! What is secure exactly? Seems like just as we start to believe that we are living in Ft. Leavenworth we realize that instead we are living in grandpa's shed. The good thing in all of this is that my credit card company is not technology minded so I do not have one of these. So for those of you that have one hope that the guy who steals your credit card is not a prior science nerd with a access to a camera (w/ flash of course).

    . . . and the moral of the story is: Just 'cause something says that it is smart doesn't mean it is.

    "Entertain the Brutes"

    1. Re:Smart, very smart? by tomsparrow · · Score: 1

      Quite right, it's a good job I don't have one of those weak smart chip things on my credit card.
      yessiree, my magnetic strip if far safer, now I can give my credit card out to random stangers with no fear of getting ripped off.

    2. Re:Smart, very smart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids today learned that smart cards were dumb. They already are aware that teachers are dumb. The kids staged a protest and showed that pencil, paper and abacus sould still solve modern day problems. Microsoft announced today that because then children demand innovation we are going to ship Microsoft Abacus, Microsoft Pencil and Microsoft Paper. Because the kids like Pizza they are going to ship today Microsoft Pizza. Of course they will all have to be connected to the .NET framework. Bill Gates also announced the shipping of Microsoft BSD, Microsoft MAC, and Microsoft Linux. Bill Gates then said we know that people have to shit so we are going to be selling shitpaper with the Microsoft Logo so when you take a crap you can wipe your ass with the Micorosoft Logo.

  25. don't write the PIN on the back of your smart card by Bogatyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if I'm not running an enccrypted filesystem on a hard drive, and someone steals the hard drive out of that computer, they can read the data. Now I consider this article's significance to be just another reminder that physical security is important.
    (quoting from the linked article)
    "The Pentagon (news - web sites) has armed soldiers with smart cards for online identity and physical access...Some of the information stored in the card is in the form of a number composed of ones and zeros that cryptographers refer to as a "private key." That key is part of a two-key system that is used to encode and decode information. The security of such systems is compromised if the private key is revealed. Typically, after the card holder authenticates the card by supplying a pin number, the private key will then be used to encrypt any sort of transaction using the card."

  26. I hope that this is a joke by dmomo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since laws only stop people who obey laws. Not people with a large enough incetive to benefit from sevurity circumvention.

    1. Re:I hope that this is a joke by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Since when did doing something useful ever take precedence over the appearance of doing something useful.

      If Congress constained themselves to measures that were actually designed to _be_ useful rather than _sound_ useful they'd have a lot more time for sex scandals.

      Sounds like a win-win situation for everyone but the interns.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:I hope that this is a joke by ethereal · · Score: 1

      If more politicians understood that, we wouldn't have useless laws against cell phone scanning either :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  27. More Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more fun to use a good sized tightly focused flashgun to melt the plastic underneath dark ink on CD's and plastic bags. You can also try this trick on things like phone books and see a quick puff of smoke from the instantly vaporized ink and paper.

  28. Just stick the chip under the skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a digital angel type technology and stick the chip in your hand.

    No flash bulbs or microscopes would be able to penetrate and you wouldn't have to worry about loosing the thing.

    rev 14.9

    1. Re:Just stick the chip under the skin by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1

      No flash bulbs or microscopes would be able to penetrate

      Scapals can penetrate though. I hope the badguys use anesthetic .

    2. Re:Just stick the chip under the skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People scream louder then Smart Cards.

      Beside, if the standard EM pulse that a human nervous system broadcasts stops then have the chip wipes itself[ala the button technology talked about earlier].

  29. Wow, wonder what mag power you need for the scope by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't mind being able to do this to a DirecTV access card. Grab that juicy elliptic crypto key...

    Seriously though, this works well for unlocking locked out cards, and reading the rom... but for other info that may be in a rom not directly accessible to the 8051 mcu, this isn't very valuable. Also, some of the nicest info, might not even be in a rom, but weaved into a crypto asic.

    Still, if you can alter the value of a register with the microscope... could you actually read out by hand the values stored in a masked rom? Or reverse engineer an asic?

    This could kick some serious ass.

  30. Obligatory M$ Zinger Here by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Remember, when a security technology is compromised you don't improve the technology, you outlaw anything that exposes its weakness.

    Well, that's one way to get rid of Windows...

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  31. Yet another reminder... by supercytro · · Score: 1

    ...that it's best not to keep all your eggs in one basket. Knowledge of hardware and software security as well as common sense is required for if security is paramount.

  32. Duct Tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So versatile...!

    You can't have a proper hack job without Duct Tape (capitalised because it is Holy) and this research was no different.

    Smartcards are not 100% secure... but can they be made secure enough? And where do you draw the line? 1 in a million fakes, or 1 in a billion?

  33. IRS by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    I Rape Soviets
    Inner Rectum Society
    Igloo Raiding Slovanians
    Inherently Raciest Sparkplug
    Indians Read Slowly
    Ida Rena Southpaw

    The IRS took my children sold them into slavery and all I got was the yearly bill!

  34. Mod-point wasting post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
      • From Rob Malda's diary

        A few years ago, while browsing around the library downtown, I had to take a piss. As I entered the john a big beautiful all-American football hero type, about twenty-five, came out of one of the booths. I stood at the urinal looking at him out of the corner of my eye as he washed his hands. He didn't once look at me. He was "straight" and married -- and in any case I was sure I wouldn't have a chance with him.

        As soon as he left I darted into the booth he'd vacated, hoping there might be a lingering smell of shit and even a seat still warm from his sturdy young ass. I found not only the smell but the shit itself. He'd forgotten to flush. And what a treasure he had left behind. Three or four beautiful specimens floated in the bowl. It apparently had been a fairly dry, constipated shit, for all were fat, stiff, and ruggedly textured. The real prize was a great feast of turd -- a nine inch gastrointestinal triumph as thick as a man's wrist.

        I knelt before the bowl, inhaling the rich brown fragrance and wondered if I should obey the impulse building up inside me. I'd always been a heavy rimmer and had lapped up more than one little clump of shit, but that had been just an inevitable part of eating ass and not an end in itself. Of course I'd had jerkoff fantasies of devouring great loads of it (what rimmer hasn't), but I had never done it. Now, here I was, confronted with the most beautiful five-pound turd I'd ever feasted my eyes on, a sausage fit to star in any fantasy and one I knew to have been hatched from the asshole of the world's handsomest young stud.

        Why not? I plucked it from the bowl, holding it with both hands to keep it from breaking. I lifted it to my nose. It smelled like rich, ripe limburger (horrid, but thrilling), yet had the consistency of cheddar. What is cheese anyway but milk turning to shit without the benefit of a digestive tract?

        I gave it a lick and found that it tasted better then it smelled. I've found since then that shit nearly almost does.

        I hesitated no longer. I shoved the fucking thing as far into my mouth as I could get it and sucked on it like a big brown cock, beating my meat like a madman. I wanted to completely engulf it and bit off a large chunk, flooding my mouth with the intense, bittersweet flavor. To my delight I found that while the water in the bowl had chilled the outside of the turd, it was still warm inside. As I chewed I discovered that it was filled with hard little bits of something I soon identified as peanuts. He hadn't chewed them carefully and they'd passed through his body virtually unchanged. I ate it greedily, sending lump after peanutty lump sliding scratchily down my throat. My only regret was the donor of this feast wasn't there to wash it down with his piss.

        I soon reached a terrific climax. I caught my cum in the cupped palm of my hand and drank it down. Believe me, there is no more delightful combination of flavors than the hot sweetness of cum with the rich bitterness of shit.

        Afterwards I was sorry that I hadn't made it last longer. But then I realized that I still had a lot of fun in store for me. There was still a clutch of virile turds left in the bowl. I tenderly fished them out, rolled them into my handkerchief, and stashed them in my briefcase. In the week to come I found all kinds of ways to eat the shit without bolting it right down. Once eaten it's gone forever unless you want to filch it third hand out of your own asshole. Not an unreasonable recourse in moments of desperation or simple boredom.

        I stored the turds in the refrigerator when I was not using them but within a week they were all gone. The last one I held in my mouth without chewing, letting it slowly dissolve. I had liquid shit trickling down my throat for nearly four hours. I must have had six orgasms in the process.

        I often think of that lovely young guy dropping solid gold out of his sweet, pink asshole every day, never knowing what joy it could, and at least once did, bring to a grateful shiteater.

  35. Also... by shr3k · · Score: 1

    Differential Power Analysis and even Simple Power Analysis (SPA) can be used on a smart card.

    1. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nice thing about DPA is that it is non-intrusive, unlike this attack which requires access to an expensive probing station each time you wish to replicate it. DPA can be largely automated as well to compromise large quantities of cards once the general characteristic is found.

  36. Like father like son by dmccarty · · Score: 1
    Mr. Skorobogatov is a Russian emigrant who was once employed in the former Soviet Union's nuclear weapons program, where his job was to maintain bombs.

    This wasn't mentioned in the article, but apparently young Skorobogatov discovered the smart-card vulnerability during the bright flashes of his dad's exploives tests at the tender age of six.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    1. Re:Like father like son by dmccarty · · Score: 1
      This wasn't mentioned in the article, but apparently young Skorobogatov discovered the smart-card vulnerability during the bright flashes of his dad's exploives tests at the tender age of six.

      Gee, that wasn't nearly as funny as I thought it would be...

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    2. Re:Like father like son by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      call me crazy, but I don't think smart cards have been around that long.

  37. This is not a problem! (duh!) by @madeus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a neat trick, sure but it's not a big issue.

    This could ALREADY be done by anyone with a smart card reader already (which is cheaper than a camera and a microscope I might add!).

    Duh! :)

    Sensitive data on cards are stored encrypted using the readers public key. The data on the smartcard can be sent from the reader to a centralised location (over a network, much like the way credit cards are verified in realtime just now) and then decoded and verified by a central point (or a selction of central points for redundancy).

    It's a given that the smartcard could always be read - this has been accounted for in design of secure systems that use smart cards (we'll the good ones anyway, addmittedly there are quite few which don't (there are a lot of muppets in this industry) :).

    1. Re:This is not a problem! (duh!) by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      This attack doesn't pertain to simple memory cards, but rather full blown microprocessor cards. Here's a good primer explaining some of the differences.

      Basically in a 'real' smart card, you access the data through the microprocessor, not directly. The encryption is performed on the card itself, not the host, increasing security (at least until now I suppose.)

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    2. Re:This is not a problem! (duh!) by cyr · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me the cards you are talking about are not "smart" cards but rather simple memory cards. A real smart card has a processor and private program and data memory you can't just read out.

      Take the cards used for sat TV, you send it encrypted data and get the decrypted version back. The decryption key(s) is/are on the card and can't easily be read.

    3. Re:This is not a problem! (duh!) by L-One-L-One · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't be so sure ! The application you describe is very particular.

      In practice, smartcards are often used as tamperproof devices to represent a third party, such as a bank. In France, for example, the credit card smart cards carry the bank's private key (for a Gilou/Quisquater RSA variant) as well as some additionnal secret information.
      This information is not available for any reader but is used internaly for cryptographic computations.

  38. Re:Not very shocking news. Really. by bogado · · Score: 2

    At a certain level every security measure in computer are from obscurity, you are safe because no one knows your password. But the problem arises when the design of the security measures must be made secret to keep it safe. I don't know if this is the case with the smart cards, or at least with all of them.

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  39. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    http://www.eveeieyhfgfcdoosammgwsnboivvbsczxlzga bc / /ooieiabdcdjsvbkeldfogjhiyeeejkagclmieooionoepdk / /abcdefmfighyiqxjklmonopqrosoyotuvwxoyqwertyuiov / /sdfghjklqewiuznmbjadzmcloeuirquakndsflksjdflkas / /fskdfasiewurznmcvweroiqewrnamdnzcvuowieramnfkas / /dfhzuxcihskjrnakjzkjcxbviusayrkajsfzxncvizudyri / /bakdnfbzkcvhgiuegriweramdnfzxlcvueirhamdnzkciue / /jranbsdmfzcowierandmfxzncbkjhfabsdifuweajzkxcuw / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /ooieiabdcdjsvbkeldfogjhiyeeejkagclmieooionoepdk / /abcdefmfighyiqxjklmonopqrosoyotuvwxoyqwertyuiov / /sdfghjklqewiuznmbjadzmcloeuirquakndsflksjdflkas / /fskdfasiewurznmcvweroiqewrnamdnzcvuowieramnfkas / /dfhzuxcihskjrnakjzkjcxbviusayrkajsfzxncvizudyri / /bakdnfbzkcvhgiuegriweramdnfzxlcvueirhamdnzkciue / /jranbsdmfzcowierandmfxzncbkjhfabsdifuweajzkxcuw / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /ooieiabdcdjsvbkeldfogjhiyeeejkagclmieooionoepdk / /abcdefmfighyiqxjklmonopqrosoyotuvwxoyqwertyuiov / /sdfghjklqewiuznmbjadzmcloeuirquakndsflksjdflkas / /fskdfasiewurznmcvweroiqewrnamdnzcvuowieramnfkas / /dfhzuxcihskjrnakjzkjcxbviusayrkajsfzxncvizudyri / /bakdnfbzkcvhgiuegriweramdnfzxlcvueirhamdnzkciue / /jranbsdmfzcowierandmfxzncbkjhfabsdifuweajzkxcuw / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois / /jfweknasdkfjzoxijkenraksjdfoizxjvlknwerlkajsdfo / /ooieiabdcdjsvbkeldfogjhiyeeejkagclmieooionoepdk / /abcdefmfighyiqxjklmonopqrosoyotuvwxoyqwertyuiov / /sdfghjklqewiuznmbjadzmcloeuirquakndsflksjdflkas / /fskdfasiewurznmcvweroiqewrnamdnzcvuowieramnfkas / /dfhzuxcihskjrnakjzkjcxbviusayrkajsfzxncvizudyri / /bakdnfbzkcvhgiuegriweramdnfzxlcvueirhamdnzkciue / /jranbsdmfzcowierandmfxzncbkjhfabsdifuweajzkxcuw / /erhasdfzxncvkjdfyiuzxcnvsikirkajeajsbdfkzxbuyef / /rahsdjbzcvxmnvcuweyriausdnfzxbcvkwueyrajnbvkjxg / /iwueyajdfkzxjcnbkeyriaushdfkjbzbuowrnasdkfbhuie / /asjmfnkkbyiurnakjsndfkzjbhiuwerajsknfkzbyhweiua / /dkfjbzkxvbjywekrjaskjnvzxjcweruiasdhfkzjxnsjkld / /fasoidfjalskdfasklhfxjdnmenrqoiuozxcopjgneaksjo / /nzxdkfajlsdfkljsdfoiasdfasndflzxkcvozixucoqweiu / /pwoeiruzxmncvoutyqwerizxnvmxmcnvoweurqmznxmbouw / /rmnzbkhuyrtjghanzxcvbkhgjweyriaudfbznbkweruyabz / /bcvnkdhityqhagsdfjglsieurakfsdnfbvfdsajkbiuyqwe / /kweorjasdknfbkjsdoifuzxbcmfgsltjewioahsdfnbzxcb / /heoiroaisjdfzbxckjksrhiuehadsfbzkxjcbhkeuryaksj / /fzbxcvkxlkcnvmndskfjwehaiursdfzjxnbjkdfhskdflas / /yroausdfzxmncvskeyiqozsjhfasdfoiwueranmcnzbkjhd / /ueafhksjfwheuirasdjhbzxiuewjhasmdnkfzxciurhaskj / /roiquwermcvkhiruhasdkjfnzxkjyeiuahsdbzxckjvopwe / /uqweuirjhvxzckjhweriuasydfoiqurnmxckvhweruiahdj / /znkxcvjhwierahsfzkxhhidufhsakjbzxjchiwueryqagsd / /kjhaksdfnbakwreyhaisknfjkzxbcvkoiqwueraskfzxcbk / /nlkwejrasoidjfxzlknvlkwjeroiasudflknzxlkbjeoiru / /slkdjfzxnmvkljdfawienzxveoriuaskdfjzxcmbnkseuri / /kfjlznxcvksjroeijasdklzjfowierqouasdhfzxncbkjhd / /jsdfljkweoriuasdfkjzxmcnvlkjdowuieraksdflkzxjbo / /werklasdnfmzxclkjewoijasdlfknzlkjwoeirqpweoiasd / /kjzxjvwperaksdjfxzweirjaslkdfzxnclvkjweroiasufd / /zxclkjeworijasdflknzlbkoiwuraksjflknxblkwjerois
    1. Re:Mod-point wasting post by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      I haven't read in -1 for a long time, this is a interesting troll. I love how you mutilated the *BSD troll and made it sound origional.

      Thanks for the laugh

      (logging in so I can watch replies, don't mod down please)

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  40. Re:Wow, wonder what mag power you need for the sco by gwizah · · Score: 1

    You still need access to a "manual probing station" I hear some online DSS reatailers have them...Not sure about the duct tape tho ;)

    --

    There is no spork.
  41. It's relatively simple to do... by proverbialcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but not so easy to do without someone noticing. I mean, if you're going to have the Flash card in your possession long enough to perform the attack UNDER A MICROSCOPE, wouldn't it just be easier to yank the data with one of those smart-card reader/portable hard-drive things that ThinkGeek was advertising on here?

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:It's relatively simple to do... by JKR · · Score: 2, Informative
      wouldn't it just be easier to yank the data with one of those smart-card reader/portable hard-drive things that ThinkGeek was advertising on here?


      No, because the cards that are being talked about are cryptographically "secured", in some way or other. You'd find that, for example, you wouldn't be able to read out a private key required to descramble the program contents because the key wouldn't appear in the same memory space as the readable part of the card (this is how SD-card works).

      The clever bit here is the use of high energy density light to tamper with "tamperproof" hardware.

  42. If this were in the US... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

    ...someone would already have slapped an injunction on them under the DMCA. Wheeee!

    --
    -EvilMagnus
  43. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    (Reposted from an eariler story -- worth reading.)

    It is now official - a Slashdot poll has confirmed: Slashdot is dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered Slashdot community when recently a poll on the site confirmed that up-to-date and factually-correct stories account for less than 40 percent of all submitted news stories, that the user-moderation system has fallen to pieces through the oppressive power of the editors, and that subscribers don't need to pay and can use such software as JunkBuster to filter out adverts. Coming on the heels of the latest MSNBC survey which plainly states that Slashdot has lost more readers, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Slashdot is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Kuro5hin technology site popularity test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Slashdot's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Slashdot faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for it because Slashdot is dying. Things are looking very bad for the site. As many of us are already aware, Slashdot continues to lose readers. Red ink flows like a river of blood. The subscribers scheme is the most endangered of them all, having lost 62% of its paying readers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Slashdot editor and homosexual-rights campaigner Rob Malda (CmdrTaco) states that there are 700 paying subscribers to Slashdot. How many normal readers are there? Let's see. The number of subscriber versus reader posts on Slashdot is roughly in ratio of 1 to 4. Therefore there are about 700*4 = 2800 normal casual readers. Anonymous Coward posts are about half of the volume of the typical posts. Therefore there are about 1400 readers who can't be bothered setting up an account. A recent article put the Trolls, who post sexual insults, foul ASCII art pictures and links to vile sites, at about 80 percent of the Slashdot readership. Therefore there are (700+8400+4200)*4 = 19600 trolling readers. This is consistent with the number of Troll posts.

    Due to the troubles of Andover.net, abysmal hit counts and so on, Slashdot went out of business and was taken over by OSDN who run another troubled site. Now OSDN is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Slashdot has steadily declined in readership. It is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Slashdot is to survive at all it will be among geeky hobbyist dabblers. Slashdot continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Slashdot is dead.

    So why now? Why did Slashdot fail? Once you get over the myriad of incompatible personalities, particularly among the editors who have repeatedly failed to check for serious inaccuracies in their stories (see the FreeBSD 4.5 "release" as a shocking example), it's clear that subscribers will continue to decrease. Using software such as JunkBuster, readers can eliminate adverts without having to pay any money. These two significant factors, along with the corrupted "moderation" scheme (where editors have infinite power over the regular moderators), only confirm yet further that Slashdot's glory days are coming to an end.

    Fact: Slashdot is dying

  44. The simple solution.... by docbrown42 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ....is to start making smart cards out of nanotubes! That way, when the hackers try to extract the data with their camera flash, the cards will explode! BOOM!

    -Ed

    Graphic Design, Web Design, Computer Rendering, Role-Playing Games...All the Good stuff

    docbrown.net

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  45. Not so smart.... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
    Smart cards can be attacked by messing with clocks, messing with the power and the type used for GSM, can be exhaustively attacked by using an "Identify" command. This is just one more attack. However, the truth of it, the protection of smartcards is generally adequate but perhaps not suitable for something like military level crypto keys. Of course, what do the military have with their Fortezza based cryptographic PCMCIA-cards, why smart cards of course!

    I-buttons are being spoken about elsewhere here. They are nice and can fit nicely on a key ring, but the form factor of the smartcard is easier when you have more than one in your pocket.

    However, a smartcard is better than a credit/debit card with a magnetic stripe. It is better than a physical key. Both of these can be duplicated in seconds. Someone has to have your smartcard in their possession for several hours before an attack is likely to succeed. Hopefully, you may have noticed by then and have cancelled the thing.

    1. Re:Not so smart.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.
      Every magnetic stripe card is unique, and if you use a more current sense sensitve reader head, it cannot be copied.

      The Japanese have patented random ink splatters, on things like bus tickets, these too are dirt cheap to produce, and like above, near forgeproof.

      Look up focused ion beam and smartcards, lithium nicobate. Money, and time break digital storage devices, and unlike analog storage mediums, can be duplicated exactly.

      A combined analog/digital solution is needed.

    2. Re:Not so smart.... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I know about mag strip reading and the use of magnetic watermarking. It just doesn't seem to be used anywhere (probably due to the watermark suffering degradation). Oh and the EC debit-card system popular in Europe can be compromised in a maximum of 150 attacks (the PIN is stored three times on the card).

      Good security is about something you have (a token) and something you know (an activation key). With stripe readers, you have something that is barely more secure than a physical key. With smartcards, you have about 4-8 hrs of security if it falls into the wrong hands.

      My point is exactly that a Smartcard takes many hours to compromise. You need the processor on the card to cooperate during the atacks, and a Pentium 4, it isn't. Even if you have fast computers outside, you are still limited by the speed of the smartcard.

  46. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
    8/88888\8888888888888\888888888888/8888\8888888
    |8888888|8888888888888\8888888888|888888|888888
    |8888888`.8888888888888|888888888|8888888:88888
    `88888888|8888888888888|88888888\|8888888|88888
    8\8888888|8/8888888/88\\\888--__8\\8888888:8888
    88\888888\/888_--~~8888888888~--__|8\88888|8888
    888\888888\_-~88888888888888888888~-_\8888|8888
    0000\_00000\00000000_.--------.______\|000|0000
    000000\00000\______//0_0___0_0(_(__>00\000|000 0
    0000000\000.00C0___)00______0(_(____>00|00/000 0
    0000000/\0|000C0____)/ \0(_____>00|_/00000
    000000/0/\|000C_____) |00(___>000/00\0000
    00000|000(000_C_____)\______/00//0_/0/00000\000
    00000|0000\00|__000\\_________//0(__/0000000|00
    0000|0\0000\____)000`----000--'0000000000000|00
    0000|00\_0000000000___\ /_0000000000_/0|0
    000|00000000000000/0000| |00\000000000000|
    000|0000000000000|0000/ \00\00000000000|0
    666|6666666666/6/6666| |66\66666666666|0
    666|666666666/6/666666\__/\___/6666|6666666666|
    66|66666666666/66666666| |6666666|666666666|
    66|6666666666|666666666| |6666666|666666666|

    88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
    8/88888\8888888888888\888888888888/8888\8888888
    |8888888|8888888888888\8888888888|888888|888888
    |8888888`.8888888888888|888888888|8888888:88888
    `88888888|8888888888888|88888888\|8888888|88888
    8\8888888|8/8888888/88\\\888--__8\\8888888:8888
    88\888888\/888_--~~8888888888~--__|8\88888|8888
    888\888888\_-~88888888888888888888~-_\8888|8888
    0000\_00000\00000000_.--------.______\|000|0000
    000000\00000\______//0_0___0_0(_(__>00\000|000 0
    0000000\000.00C0___)00______0(_(____>00|00/000 0
    0000000/\0|000C0____)/ \0(_____>00|_/00000
    000000/0/\|000C_____) |00(___>000/00\0000
    00000|000(000_C_____)\______/00//0_/0/00000\000
    00000|0000\00|__000\\_________//0(__/0000000|00
    0000|0\0000\____)000`----000--'0000000000000|00
    0000|00\_0000000000___\ /_0000000000_/0|0
    000|00000000000000/0000| |00\000000000000|
    000|0000000000000|0000/ \00\00000000000|0
    666|6666666666/6/6666| |66\66666666666|0
    666|666666666/6/666666\__/\___/6666|6666666666|
    66|66666666666/66666666| |6666666|666666666|
    66|6666666666|666666666| |6666666|666666666|

    88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
    8/88888\8888888888888\888888888888/8888\8888888
    |8888888|8888888888888\8888888888|888888|888888 123456789012345678
    |8888888`.8888888888888|888888888|8888888:88888
    `88888888|8888888888888|88888888\|8888888|88888
    8\8888888|8/8888888/88\\\888--__8\\8888888:8888
    88\888888\/888_--~~8888888888~--__|8\88888|8888 123456789012
    888\888888\_-~88888888888888888888~-_\8888|8888
    0000\_00000\00000000_.--------.______\|000|0000
    000000\00000\______//0_0___0_0(_(__>00\000|000 0
    a0000000\000.00C0___)00______0(_(____>00|00/000 0
    0000000/\0|000C0____)/ \0(_____>00|_/00000
    000000/0/\|000C_____) |00(___>000/00\0000
    00000|000(000_C_____)\______/00//0_/0/00000\000
    00000|0000\00|__000\\_________//0(__/0000000|00
    0000|0\0000\____)000`----000--'0000000000000|00
    0000|00\_0000000000___\ /_0000000000_/0|0 asdasdasdasdasd
    000|00000000000000/0000| |00\000000000000| alsjdhkjdhkajhakhqwe
    000|0000000000000|0000/ \00\00000000000|0
    666|6666666666/6/6666| |66\66666666666|0
    666|666666666/6/666666\__/\___/6666|6666666666| basyguivfgyaeutgqgjsz
    66|66666666666/66666666| |6666666|666666666| jqwbhrejkfio
    66|6666666666|666666666| |6666666|666666666| jwqhrowuerir

  47. Free Your Mind ... and the rest will follow ?? by Discoteck · · Score: 1
    "Mr. Anderson is a well-known computer security researcher whose work in both computer security and cryptography is widely recognized."

    Ya but can he leap from tall building to tall building and stop bullets with the force of will?
    "Don't think you are - know you are."
    -Neo

    "The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around and what do you see? Businessmen, Teachers, Lawyers, Carpenters...the very minds of the people we're trying to save. "
    -Morpheus
    --
    /.................../ \\ /...................../
  48. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Tip #1: Play Safe

    There are some serious safety issues regarding anal sex that you need to be aware of at all times. First and foremost, whatever touches the anus shouldn't be touching anything else. Never never never take the penis out of the anus and put it into the vagina. That can lead to serious infections and other complications. After any kind of anal play, you should immediately change condoms and wash the relevant body parts thoroughly.

    Of course, STDs are also a major concern with anal sex. This isn't just limited to AIDS; herpes, genital warts, syphilis, gonorrhea, etc. can all be transmitted through anal sex. You simply shouldn't be having anal sex without a condom; it's not worth the risk to either partner.

    Tip #2: Lube, lube, lube

    One of the most important thing to remember when thinking about anal sex is that, unlike the vagina, the anus isn't self-lubricating: you gotta bring your own grease. And, the more lube you use, the better. It will make the initial penetration much more easy and less painful for the woman and make the whole experience, for both of you, much more pleasant.

    All kinds of lube are used for anal sex, from spit to Vaseline to high-tech silicone-based lubes. We'd strongly recommend spending a little money to get a high quality water-based lubricant; remember, an oil-based lubricant like Vaseline will degrade the latex in a condom, destroying its usefulness. We'd recommend products like AstroGlide or KY Jelly, available in any drug store. Note, though a condom may be "lubricated", they typically don't offer as much lube as we'd recommend for anal sex.

    There are some specialty lubes designed for anal sex that include an anesthetic to numb the woman's sensation and make anal sex less painful. We'd advise against these products. The simple fact is, pain is a way of your body telling you that something's wrong. If you're in pain during anal sex, you need to focus on solving the root problems, not anesthetizing yourself so it's easier to endure.

    Tip #3: Start Small

    Simply put, a penis is an awful big to be the first thing you stick up someone's butt. Better to start with something smaller and work your way up. Fingers are an excellent beginning point. Use one finger, then two, to initiate your partner into the mysteries of anal penetration. Try it while performing oral sex for an extra thrill. Be sure not to forget the lube, and you might also want to wear latex gloves.

    As your partner gets used to your fingers, you might graduate to a butt plug or a small dildo. Dildos are available in all shapes and sizes. Go shopping together to get one she thinks she can handle. Remember, though, don't put the dildo into the vagina after putting it into the anus. The safest way is to put a condom on the dildo before using it, and to wash it thoroughly immediately after.

  49. They need to have your card first by ChenLing · · Score: 2

    They can't do this from afar. They have to actually be in physical possession of your smart card, scrape the protective layers off, and put it under a microscope. The problem is that because smart cards are more "secure", they are trusted more, and so actual breaks in such security are harder to prove. So this is like an easy way to find out someone's PIN number once you have their ATM card.

    --
    "You have the option of insanity. I do not. And that makes me crazy!" - Brian to Angela, My So-Called Life
  50. Hey Malda by Kathleen+Fent's+Mum · · Score: -1, Troll

    Learn to spell, you fucking prick.

    That should be "it's", not "its". Grow a brain you lame goateed little cunt.

    Fuck off.

  51. Denying problem by hether · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a manufacturer who had read the paper said it believed its products were not vulnerable to the attack.

    I love how the smart card manufacturing companies are just denying that this is a problem and saying that they've already looked at that issue. Do you really think they feel that way and have covered this problem already, or off the record they are panicking to find a way to fix the problem? I would guess that this is new to them, but that they don't want to admit their cards are vulnerable.

    BTW, The story is taken from the NY Times, so if you have problems getting to the Yahoo! version of the story, try this link:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/13/technology/13SMA R.html?todaysheadlines

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:Denying problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is (free registration required)?

    2. Re:Denying problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I love how the smart card manufacturing companies are just denying that this is a problem and saying that they've already looked at that issue.


      Silicon and sensitivity to light has been known for years now. How do you think CCDs and other microsensors work? How do you think it is possible to shield the working bits of a CCD camera from light while still allowing the sensors to do their work?

      Slap a metal layer over the transistors, and they are shielded from being affected by light. Have that layer do something important (like distributing power, which you need to do anyway), and you have in effect made it very hard to remove the layer and still have a working bit of silicon.

      You can flip the chip over and try to illuminate it from underneath. The red bits of the flash light might get through, but would be scattered and affect a larger area - silicon is opaque to red light. Blue light will not penetrate more than a few hundred angstroms.

      All of these effects are well-known to any halfway decent ASIC designer.
  52. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    THE CUCUMBER AND BEST FRIEND SESSION

    Hey hey, Rob Malda (CmdrTaco) here. I have a story in the high school section about my first time, which was with my little brother's hottie friend a couple of months ago.

    Anyway, as with most of us guys, masturbation has always been a big part of my life. Ever since I can remember, I've been choking the chicken on a daily basis. Starting puberty at 11, I've masturbated at least once a day ever since. If I miss a day, then I more than make up for it the next time. So, masturbating at least 7 times a week for the past 6 years or so, (I'm now 17), that adds up to a fair amount of cum ejaculated from my ball sac!

    One of my favourite things to do while wanking is to stick phallic shaped objects up my ass. These have included my fingers, dildoes, cucumbers and anything basically resembling a cock!

    Laying spread-eagled on my bed one day, slowly stroking my uncut 6.5" dick, I massaged my hairless balls between my fingers, moaning loudly. I reached under my bed, feeling for my newly purchased friend, Mr. Cucumber...

    Finding the vegetable, I grabbed the lube and slowly lubed it up, spreading some on my expectant asshole. Thinking of what lay ahead, I slid a finger up my puckered boy hole. Then two. After adding a third, I thought it was enough so I set about getting the cucumber ready again.

    Rubbing my lubed up swollen knob sent shivers of delight down my back. Doing that was gonna make me cum if I didn't stop! My balls lobbed from side to side with the sudden pick up of pace with which I was beating my meat. I picked up the cucumber and placed the rounded end against my hole, feeling myself opening up for the glorious pleasure maker. Slipping it in sent huge ripples of delight through me. I slowly slid the vegetable in and out, all the time jerking off. After a few minutes of furious beating and fucking, I was very close to cumming.

    "Knock, knock...," was all I heard before my best friend Hemos barged in with an armful of school books.

    "Whoa! What the hell?" was his shocked response to my little bit of exhibitionism, before bursting into a fit of laughter.

    With my gorgeous best friend watching, a cucumber lodged up my ass and my frantically jacking off, it only took me about ten seconds more to burst forth with my sticky white juice. A huge glob flew at Hemos and landed at his feet, before I threw my legs in the air, with the rest of my cum landing on my chest and face.

    With Hemos's raucous laughter still in my ears, I slowly pulled my cock, easing the last remaining drops of cum out, putting my fingers to my lips.

    "Man, that's fuckin' sick, eating your own cum," he said, grinning.

    "Yeah, well, I like the taste," I smiled, "and don't deny you don't do it!" I said, before wiping my finger over each drop of cum on my body and taking it to my hungry mouth.

    Hemos continued laughing and started walking out.

    "Meet you out front in 5," he said, "give you some time to clean up."

    He strolled out, still shaking his head and laughing.

    I was very satisfied. Although I have no doubts that Hemos was totally straight, it didn't hurt to fantasise about my tanned and gorgeous friend. His face and body are a recurring image in my masturbatory fantasies.

  53. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
    8/88888\8888888888888\888888888888/8888\8888888
    |8888888|8888888888888\8888888888|888888|888888
    |8888888`.8888888888888|888888888|8888888:88888
    `88888888|8888888888888|88888888\|8888888|88888
    8\8888888|8/8888888/88\\\888--__8\\8888888:8888
    88\888888\/888_--~~8888888888~--__|8\88888|8888
    888\888888\_-~88888888888888888888~-_\8888|8888
    0000\_00000\00000000_.--------.______\|000|0000
    000000\00000\______//0_0___0_0(_(__>00\000|000 0
    0000000\000.00C0___)00______0(_(____>00|00/000 0
    0000000/\0|000C0____)/ \0(_____>00|_/00000
    000000/0/\|000C_____) |00(___>000/00\0000
    00000|000(000_C_____)\______/00//0_/0/00000\000
    00000|0000\00|__000\\_________//0(__/0000000|00
    0000|0\0000\____)000`----000--'0000000000000|00
    0000|00\_0000000000___\ /_0000000000_/0|0
    000|00000000000000/0000| |00\000000000000|
    000|0000000000000|0000/ \00\00000000000|0
    666|6666666666/6/6666| |66\66666666666|0
    666|666666666/6/666666\__/\___/6666|6666666666|
    66|66666666666/66666666| |6666666|666666666|
    66|6666666666|666666666| |6666666|666666666|

    88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
    8/88888\8888888888888\888888888888/8888\8888888
    |8888888|8888888888888\8888888888|888888|888888
    |8888888`.8888888888888|888888888|8888888:88888
    `88888888|8888888888888|88888888\|8888888|88888
    8\8888888|8/8888888/88\\\888--__8\\8888888:8888
    88\888888\/888_--~~8888888888~--__|8\88888|8888
    888\888888\_-~88888888888888888888~-_\8888|8888
    0000\_00000\00000000_.--------.______\|000|0000
    000000\00000\______//0_0___0_0(_(__>00\000|000 0
    0000000\000.00C0___)00______0(_(____>00|00/000 0
    0000000/\0|000C0____)/ \0(_____>00|_/00000
    000000/0/\|000C_____) |00(___>000/00\0000
    00000|000(000_C_____)\______/00//0_/0/00000\000
    00000|0000\00|__000\\_________//0(__/0000000|00
    0000|0\0000\____)000`----000--'0000000000000|00
    0000|00\_0000000000___\ /_0000000000_/0|0
    000|00000000000000/0000| |00\000000000000|
    000|0000000000000|0000/ \00\00000000000|0
    666|6666666666/6/6666| |66\66666666666|0
    666|666666666/6/666666\__/\___/6666|6666666666|
    66|66666666666/66666666| |6666666|666666666|
    66|6666666666|666666666| |6666666|666666666|

    88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
    8/88888\8888888888888\888888888888/8888\8888888
    |8888888|8888888888888\8888888888|888888|888888 123456789012345678
    |8888888`.8888888888888|888888888|8888888:88888
    `88888888|8888888888888|88888888\|8888888|88888
    8\8888888|8/8888888/88\\\888--__8\\8888888:8888
    88\888888\/888_--~~8888888888~--__|8\88888|8888 123456789012
    888\888888\_-~88888888888888888888~-_\8888|8888
    0000\_00000\00000000_.--------.______\|000|0000
    000000\00000\______//0_0___0_0(_(__>00\000|000 0
    a0000000\000.00C0___)00______0(_(____>00|00/000 0
    0000000/\0|000C0____)/ \0(_____>00|_/00000
    000000/0/\|000C_____) |00(___>000/00\0000
    00000|000(000_C_____)\______/00//0_/0/00000\000
    00000|0000\00|__000\\_________//0(__/0000000|00
    0000|0\0000\____)000`----000--'0000000000000|00
    0000|00\_0000000000___\ /_0000000000_/0|0 asdasdasdasdasd
    000|00000000000000/0000| |00\000000000000| alsjdhkjdhkajhakhqwe
    000|0000000000000|0000/ \00\00000000000|0
    666|6666666666/6/6666| |66\66666666666|0
    666|666666666/6/666666\__/\___/6666|6666666666| basyguivfgyaeutgqgjsz
    66|66666666666/66666666| |6666666|666666666| jqwbhrejkfio
    66|6666666666|666666666| |6666666|666666666| jwqhrowuerir

  54. The handyman's secret weapon by gambit3 · · Score: 4, Funny


    "We used duct tape to fix the photoflash lamp on the video port of a Wentworth Labs MP-901 manual probing station," they wrote in their paper.

    No matter how high tech, there's no experiment that can't be improved with duct tape

    1. Re:The handyman's secret weapon by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1
      No matter how high tech, there's no experiment that can't be improved with duct tape

      ...except air ducts.

    2. Re:The handyman's secret weapon by eet23 · · Score: 1

      Will the government now ban duct tape because it can be used for card fraud?

    3. Re:The handyman's secret weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great..... so now duct tape will be outlawed as a DMCA circumvention device. Thanks guys, but you could have left that detail out - many of my own projects are now in jeopardy because of you...

  55. don't panic by g4dget · · Score: 1
    The primary attacks smart cards are designed to protect against are eavesdropping and replay. They can do that because they can run zero knowledge and public key protocols. That's a whole lot better than the magnetic strip on your credit card and is unaffected by this attack.

    Protection against physical tampering is secondary. It's nice, but even if it didn't exist at all, smart cards would still be very useful. This particular attack seems so tricky that it may not even be worth doing anything about.

  56. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Anal Sex

    Anal sex is not something that is experienced exclusively by gay men; it is a facet of our collective sexual identity which has been explored by previous cultures and continues to be explored today. Men and women of all walks of life enjoy anal sex as an alternative to everyday lovemaking. Its not for everyone, but anal sex may be what youre looking for if you want to try something completely different.

    Why do people enjoy anal sex?

    Anal sex is enjoyable because of the rich body of nerve endings in the anus. While people often experience pain when first attempting anal sex, as a person learns to relax, the pain often subsides into pleasure. For men, anal sex also offers stimulation to the prostate, an organ that provides the rush of pleasure during orgasm. Anal sex for many seems like a taboo activity, and much of society still shuns it. But statistics show that roughly 35% of heterosexuals and 50% of the gay community practice anal sex at least occasionally.

    How can I make anal sex safer?

    Anal sex can be a perfectly safe activity as long as you take the necessary precautions. You should remember that your anus and rectum do not have their own natural lubrication nor the kind of elasticity the mouth and vagina enjoy. That is why anal sex must be practiced with care. There are three things that should always be used whenever anal penetration is taking place; lubrication, condoms and common sense. Liberal amounts of lubrication are necessary because the rectal wall can be quite sticky and is subject to tearing and lesions if not kept lubricated. In addition, the anus and rectum are narrow, so lubrication is needed to press inside smoothly. Condoms are another necessity. Enemas, douches and other cleaners will not be able to get all the germs and bacteria out of the rectum. Not only is anal sex facilitate the transmission of STDs better than any other form of sex , it can also cause urinary tract infections and other bacterial diseases. Latex protection is essential, and can offer additional slickness. Finally, use your common sense. The rectal wall curves and is thin so long, hard objects can tear your insides. Don't wear any jewelry on your hands, and cut your fingernails if you are going to put your finger in someone's anus. Most importantly, respect your body. Don't push the limits and go only as far as you feel comfortable.

    How can I enjoy anal sex?

    Tips for beginners

    To prepare yourself for anal sex , the first thing to do is learn to relax. This may include a hot bath beforehand, an erotic massage or even just a good workout. Remember that the sphincter muscles around the anus will not allow things to pass through easily unless you relax and take it slow. Do not start with something the size of a dildo or penis. Your sphincter may be reluctant enough to start with your partner's finger. One partner should lubricate or place a lubricated condom over his or her finger. Take the finger and arouse the surface of the anus, perhaps making small circular motions as you go. Always pay attention to your partner to indicate whether or not he or she feels comfortable. Slowly attempt to push your finger slightly inside the anus. Do not force your hand - stop if your partner complains of discomfort. If it is difficult to enter the anus, you probably need more lubrication. The first time you try this, the receiver may feel a bit of pain. Anal sex is not for everyone, and if you feel uncomfortable stop and perhaps try again later. Think of this process as training for later anal encounters. Even a finger can provide intense stimulation when it is inserted in the anus.

    Once you have tried penetration with a finger a number of times then you can move towards something that is a bit larger. First you have to decide on what type of anal stimulation that you enjoy. Do you enjoy the movement of a finger, and the feeling of entry and withdrawal? If this is the case then you may wish to proceed by being penetrated with your partner's penis or by using an anal toy. For those who enjoy the feeling of penetration more than motion or vibration, try butt plugs which are designed specifically for this purpose. A butt plug sits inside the anus, and is not generally used for thrusting back and forth.

    Positions to try

    The best positions for anal sex depend largely on what stage you and your partner are at in your experiences. Rear entry or the "doggie style" position is the one position most people associate with anal sex. However, rear entry allows a penis or anal toy to penetrate most deeply, and may not be the best choice for the beginner. A good starting position is the "spoons" position, with each partner laying on his or her side, one behind the other. This prevents the penetrating partner from going too fast, and allows complete control over penetration. It also brings you closer to your partner, making it easier to judge his or her reactions to what youre doing.

    Another position for anal sex is a variation of the missionary position. The receiving partner lays on his or her back while the penetrating partner approaches from on top. The penetrating partner lifts up the calves or shins of the receiver, exposing the anus. This can be an especially intimate position, with both partners facing each other. The top partner can masturbate the other and is open to massage and cuddling as well.

    Finally, rear entry offers another possibility for anal penetration. This position allows the penetration to be the deepest, and permits the receiver to better open the anus for entry. Rear entry doesnt offer the kind of intimacy or ease of communication that the other positions do, but for more advanced lovers, can offer the greatest amount of thrusting and penetration.

    There are many more positions and techniques to try. Many people discover new and exciting positions through experimentation, and most people find the one that best suits them. Good communication is the key to such discovery, and a manual or video can help as well.

  57. scrape this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just me... but for $260 you can purchase a smart card burner (meant foe dss but has many other wonderful applications) pop it in, hack and enjoy... much easier than scraping and hoping you didn't screw it up. I just wonder when the technology community will finally realize no technology is foolproof... the fools are too damn smart.

    1. Re:scrape this by nomel · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with making an insecure or flawed device...when something like this happens the people who buy the product will be forced to bye a NEW product which is more secure...oohhh noo...those damn technological people just make more money dont they...

  58. Mod-point wasting post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    beastiality sex story

    beastiality sex story and animal porn for youranimal sex com pleasure. She had the look of animal sex com but with a knowing look in her animal porn. She walked by me and bumped myanimal sex com with her animal porn. Reacting quickly, I held my free beastiality photo in such a way that it guided animal porn across the fabric of myanimal sex com over my animal porn.animal sex com with animal porn. She continued a few steps and animal porn. Turning for a moment she caught myanimal sex com with her horse cum. She thenanimal sex com and with heranimal sex com staring straight ahead, walked by animal porn. This time she dragged her animal porn across my cock on purpose.She then stood beside me in theanimal sex com, turned toward the animal porn. She leaned heranimal sex com against the animal porn, as though to order free beastiality photo and rubbed her animal porn back and forth across myanimal sex com. 1) free beastiality photo . 2) andanimal sex com.

    animal porn.

    Never looking atanimal sex com, she loosened myanimal sex com and unzipped my animal porn. I felt heranimal sex com slide down my belly and onto my free beastiality photo as she whispered "myanimal sex com is as wet as you are animal porn. Beastiality thumbs and animal porn. Lets go out to theanimal sex com and animal porn." I zipped animal porn and followed her to theanimal sex com. She looked too young to Beastiality thumbs but led me to heranimal sex com car and unlocked the animal porn. She sat on theanimal sex com of the seat and hiked-up her animal porn. She pulled aside heranimal sex com and spread heranimal sex com animal porn. free beastiality photo with free bestiality sex. She smiled and closed heranimal sex com. I rubbed heranimal sex com with my animal sex stories and was on myanimal sex com before I realised what was happening.animal sex com, animal sex stories. I rubbed against heranimal sex com and stuck out my animal porn to catch a few drops of heranimal sex com. Slowly I licked up and down the freeanimal sex com, and as I did I teased her animal porn with my finger.animal sex com, giving animal porn. 1) animal porn. 2) and animal porn. free beastiality story and animal sex stories. Beastiality thumbs or indian sex.

  59. It's been done... by BlueFall · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lisa: Dad! The flash must have scrambled their circuits.
    Homer: What are you, the narrator?

    -- The Simpsons, Itchy and Scratchy Land, 2F01

  60. GOOD JOB, WASTE MOD POINTS GUY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    See subject for details! Keep 'em wasting their fucking mod points....

  61. what % of criminals are going to by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Let me think,
    The US Government,
    The UK Government,
    The French Government,
    THe Canadian Government,
    The Japaniese Government
    need i continue
    oh and of-course Microsoft.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:what % of criminals are going to by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Okay... this is perhaps taking paranoia a little far. Or at least in the wrong direction. You're suggesting that the appropriate government may hire people to steal your wallet and pull the data from your smart cards? Given the general data stored on this (credit card numbers, or digital cash), do you really think governments are so hard up they have to mug people?

      Okay, if you're suggesting that you might carry documents on a smart card, which you wouldn't want a government to see, and which they might actually want to, perhaps you have a point. Just, it seems to me that PGP and a floppy disk is a much better idea.

    2. Re:what % of criminals are going to by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I was mearly suggesting that there criminals and could do if they wanted to. People have there identity taken by somone else every day.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  62. Re:Wow, wonder what mag power you need for the sco by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Not sure we should go into much detail with this conversation here, but those DSS retailers are thieves, even by my admittedly low moral standards.

    It would be like them, to have the tools to throw things wide open (and become modestly rich doing so) but hesitate because they are too short-sighted and want to continue with their status quo. They steal from DirecTV, and steal from the consumers too. My god, with average viewing habits, it costs as much or more to pirate the signal, than it does to just subscribe. And there is no hassle when an ECM strikes, either... how much is that worth?

    Hypothetically though, let's say some guy uses this technique to grab that crypto key. That guy buys a $250 FPGA-PCI prototyping card. He loads pitou on the machine, to emulate most of the access card... and a crypto core from opencores.org onto the FPGA to emulate the asic. Boom. instead of driving 1-3 recievers off of a legit 3.5mhz asic, you'd have an FPGA running at 100mhz. No access card even necessary... and FPGA cards have legitimate uses besides pirating DirecTV.

    God, I love being a hardware hacker. Even a no-good bum talentless hardware hacker, is better than not being one at all.

  63. jinkies! by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    Alex Chiu, where are you?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  64. Okay, how about "easier"? by mbessey · · Score: 1

    The point is simply that it can be done, without needing to break the encryption on the card, which is HARD (in the mathematical sense).

    And an optical microscope and a flash gun are a lot cheaper and more common than a scanning tunneling microscope, which probably remains the tool of choice for reverse-engineering cryptographic hardware.

    -Mark

  65. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. They're criminals in the US under the DMCA.Yet another reason to revoke it.

  66. A pertinant request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Mr Troll,

    Could you please convert this cute picture of a squirrel into ASCII art suitable for posting on slashdot?

    thx

  67. physical card access by krokodil · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The vulnerability would make it possible for a criminal to find the secret information stored in the card, steal the user's cellphone identity and make free phone calls.

    To do this he needs first to get physical access to the card, which is inside the phone (usually under battery). Having access to the phone, usually allow him to make calls anyway without complex card reading procedure.

    1. Re:physical card access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      To do this he needs first to get physical access to the card, which is inside the phone (usually under battery). Having access to the phone, usually allow him to make calls anyway without complex card reading procedure.

      But then the owner knows the phone is missing and can cancel it. If you have physical access to a phone (somebody forgot it) and can clone it without their knowledge and return it, many more calls can be made.

  68. it's sad this springs to mind. by BreakWindows · · Score: 5, Funny

    A team of researchers from I.B.M.'s Thomas J. Watson Laboratory in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., said they would present a report at the conference based on their discovery ...

    Dmitri called. He said if you see any guys in cheap suits applauding on stage right, exit stage left.

    1. Re:it's sad this springs to mind. by bob_jordan · · Score: 2

      Also if while paying for your shopping with a newfangled smartcard based cash card system, the clerk asks you to hold on a moment and disappears below the counter, at which point there is a bright flash and the sound of a flashgun recharging ... check your balance before you leave.

      Bob.

    2. Re:it's sad this springs to mind. by fiftyfly · · Score: 1

      mmm, it's comments like that that almost make me wish I had a "send this comment to my congressman" button

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  69. One more relevant bit by distributed.karma · · Score: 1
    > Mr. Anderson is a well-known computer security researcher whose work in both computer security and cryptography is widely recognized.

    Mr. Anderson.. I find your lack of cooperation.. disturbing.

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  70. That's what they're calling it these days, eh? by soulcuttr · · Score: 3, Funny

    From what little I know, any criminal who has been to jail has had access to a "manual probing station". IANAC (I Am Not A Criminal), but I think it's located in the showers.

    -Sou|cuttr

  71. No wonder they were able to figure this out. by corporate+zombie · · Score: 1

    Mr. Anderson is a well-known computer security researcher whose work in both computer security and cryptography is widely recognized.


    Neo reads matrix. News at 11.

    -CZ
  72. Re:don't write the PIN on the back of your smart c by nochops · · Score: 1

    You're right, physical security is important. But the problem here is that physical security becomes more complicated when you are *intentionally* giving your smart card (credit card, ID badge, etc.) to someone (waiter, security personell, etc.).

    You need to trust that waiter isn't going to take your card and swipe it with his palm-pilot card reader. Now, I guess you also need to trust that the waiter doesn't have a photo-strobe and microscope handy.

    Your hard disk, on the other hand, is not likely to leave your posession normally, unless someone steals it, or you RMA the hard disc with the manufacturer.

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  73. Mr. Anderson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mr. Anderson is a well-known computer security researcher whose work in both computer security and cryptography is widely recognized.

    My name is Neo!

  74. Re:don't write the PIN on the back of your smart c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the real problem currently is that many of the cryptographic cards presently deployed store the keys plaintext in memory -- and they can be retrieved from the host (as much of the work is done on the host computer when signing/verifying/encrypting/decrypting). The most recent cards (and the ones coming out soon) generally do a better job of this -- and employ a variety of techniques to prevent this sort of attack (encrypting the storage on the card is only one such approach). Wish I could talk about it in greater depth, as I work on just such a product, but NDAs and other contracts prevent it.

  75. This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been able to rip the raw data from smartcards for months using my unLOOPer.

    If you don't believe me, ask DAVE.

  76. Now I have a really geeky project for that QX3! by sup4hleet · · Score: 1

    I wonder if /. will get busted for pushing circumvention technologies? Lock up the microscopes before the l33t h4X0rs 0wN j00!

  77. Re:Wow, wonder what mag power you need for the sco by ethereal · · Score: 1

    Yes, because by interpreting radio signals that Hughes Aerospace is beaming through your head right now as a football game rather than as static, you're somehow taking the property of DirecTV, not to mention other consumers. This is like some sort of piracy Heisenberg theorem, isn't it - a signal that's observed is "pirated", while a signal that's ignored isn't? How is it Hughes out any more money if their signal is absorbed by your head or a rock rather than a "pirate" satellite dish?

    And your other argument was that it's cheaper to just buy it in the first place? Heck, if I had the time, I'd intercept and decrypt DirecTV signals just for the fun factor :)

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  78. They come in rings by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Cool. I've always wanted a power ring of some sort. Now I can have one. Put a sensor on the monitor, and have a voice recognition system, and voila! a system you hold your ring to and say "By the power of Linux" to log in.

  79. Isn't this illegal? by Spudley · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I thought the DCMA made this sort of research illegal?

    'Cause after all, we don't want to know about serious flaws in our security systems, do we?

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  80. perhaps this is the motivation for getting chipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people had the chip inside their bodies, then epeople would be safe, LOL.

  81. Correction Re:This is not a problem! (duh!) by Vortran · · Score: 2

    You can't "read" the program data off a smart card... even with a reader. You can only read the output that the smart card povides through its interface. This would be the encrypted data which you can decrypt with the public key.

    To get the program and data (private key), you have to be able to read the memory directly. This is not possible with a smart card reader. Hence, the attack with microscopes and whatnot.

    You want the private key in order to ENcrypt data to be read by the smart card or the institution that issued it in order to fake the system.

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
  82. Even better... by somethingwicked · · Score: 1
    than denying the problem is immediately admitting that it could be a problem...

    He said his company had built defensive measures into its products that would make them invulnerable to such an attack.

    They're invincible!!!! Invincible, I say!

    However, he said he was unwilling to be specific about the nature of the security system, because such information would be valuable to someone who was attempting to break the security of the Atmel smart cards.

    Well, not THAT invincible...

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  83. Penn State id+ by idg101 · · Score: 1

    How does our 'lion cash' chip work at PSU? anyone konw? I konw the cash amount is kept on the card. This I am sure of. If you loose the card, they say you loose the money. I am positive of that. I would be intrested though in seeing how that chip works.

  84. Re: Explanation by @madeus · · Score: 2

    Oh yes, agree of course, but no I am talking about smart cards (though depending on the use).

    Encrypting the data on the card acts as a second layer, as the data on the card is encrypted by the card (as with, say a Sky TV card), but having that data itself also be encrypted against a public key and verifed by the device reading *as well* (which would be appropriate for something like say a secure door pass networked to a central server) would be appropriately secure (though biometrics would probably be more secure, if only they were reliable [HHOS] :-).

    By way of illustration:

    *insert smart card in door pass*

    Smart card: Hi, gimme some data I can use to authenticate you.
    Reader: Here you are.
    *Smart card churns over*
    Smart card: Okay, here's some authentication data based on the input you gave me.
    Reader: Cheers, let me check that data by decrypting it against my private key.
    *Reader sends data to server*
    *Server decrypts key, compares contents (a passphrase) against a stored hash of the users passphrase.*
    Server: Yep, authenticates okay.

    *Door opens*

    This way, even if someone reverse engineered your card and built a reader, they could not get the data out unless they were also able to decrypt your authentication.

    If the card supported writing data to, you could give it a key based on a onetime pad after authenticating them too, which would be really secure (meaing the card would have be used before it was reporting missing or compromised, as you couldn't then simply make one identicle copy and keep using it because it would of course change each time it was used).

  85. Explanation by @madeus · · Score: 2

    I'm seeing a lot of very similar replies, so I guess I didn't explain it very well :-).

    Re posting this as a reply to myself so that more people will see it..

    Encrypting the data on the card acts as a second layer, as the data on the card is encrypted by the card (as with, say a Sky TV card), but having that data itself also be encrypted against a public key and verifed by the device reading *as well* (which would be appropriate for something like say a secure door pass networked to a central server) would be appropriately secure (though biometrics would probably be more secure, if only they were reliable [HHOS] :-).

    By way of illustration:

    *insert smart card in door pass*
    Smart card: Hi, gimme some data I can use to authenticate you.
    Reader: Here you are.
    *Smart card churns over*
    Smart card: Okay, here's some authentication data based on the input you gave me.
    Reader: Cheers, let me check that data by decrypting it against my private key.
    *Reader sends data to server*
    *Server decrypts key, compares contents (a passphrase) against a stored hash of the users passphrase say (just as an example).*
    Server: Yep, authenticates okay.
    *Door opens*

    This way, even if someone reverse engineered your card and built a reader, they could not get the data out unless they were also able to decrypt your authentication.

    As a stage further, you could give the card a new 'key 'based on a one time pad after authenticating them too, which would be really secure (meaing the card would have be used before it was reporting missing or compromised, as you couldn't then simply make one identicle copy and keep using it because it would of course change each time it was used).

    This *could* even work in something like Sky / OnDigitial boxes because they both already have modems which could be used to authenticate the new card (monthly, or yearly when a new card was inserted) but not obviously for realtime decoding of video data. :-) Possibly just for authentication pherhaps....(though to be honest, that level of security would be be relevent in this particular instance :-)

  86. Re:Explanation (minor correction - typo) by @madeus · · Score: 2

    Of course:

    Though to be honest, that level of security would be be relevent in this particular instance :-)

    Should read:

    Though to be honest, that level of security would *not* be relevent in this particular instance :-)

  87. Re:Wow, wonder what mag power you need for the sco by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Well, I do this for the fun factor.

    Yes, I agree that interpreting signals beamed onto your property is nothing evil or or thieving. Make no mistakes though, the law isn't on your side (not even in Canada anymore). What is even worse, apparently DirecTV has the technology to aim where they send this signal. I'm not sure how finegrained it is (doubtful that it can send to your neighbor subscriber, but not to you), but they no doubt improve it slowly just so the burden isn't placed on them. Much easier to buy laws.

    Dealers though? Dealers ARE stealing. If anyone has the right to sell this signal, and I'm not sure anyone does have it, it most certainly is DirecTV's right, and theirs alone. Dealers aren't selling things at a modest price, so that they can make a living, or anything like that, they are profiteering. No excuses or justifications are possible. The very thing they are selling, is watered down, so they can continue to sell it longer, and jack up prices. That's why I would love to see some asic emulation VHDL show up anonymously on the web. Would destroy their access card black market, would make the supply for all practical purposes unlimited and just totally screw everything over.

  88. Man this sucks by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Well for me it does. I work for a certain company that's trying to use smart cards in a certain product that shouldn't use smart cards but buzzword loving project managers don't want to use anything else... so anyway, I guess this will mean we have to scrap the whole smart card idea and start over on something else...

    --

    ~ now you know
  89. I read about that too by swb · · Score: 2

    I read about the waitron pocket-scanner, too. Most of the waitrons I know wouldn't have been coerced, they would have done it for free drugs, which is how this was probably paid for. After the first couple of payments you'll either keep coming back or they'll use the past drug payments against you..

  90. Smart Crowbar by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

    I don't see the big deal... By the time it takes for a criminal to do this flash thingie to your smartcard, hopefully you'd notice its gone and change your stuff accordingly. :) And hey, as far as door access goes, my "smart crowbar " Beats the heck out of a smart card anyday!

  91. Re:Wow, wonder what mag power you need for the sco by ethereal · · Score: 1

    Agreed on that - decrypting broadcasts should be fun for the whole family, not just a few dealers. Although I'm not sure how they could be stealing the signal; they're just selling hardware, not the signal itself, aren't they? You could say that they're profiteering on the hardware, but not on the signal, I think.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  92. New kind of cryptography.. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 0
    IANAC, but I always thought that public keys where used to encrypt and private keys to DECRYPT.

    Excerpt from article: ... the private key will then be used to encrypt any sort of transaction using the card.

    Apparently its either:

    1) I really don't know anything about PK Crypto or

    2) oh come on can't you take a joke at the expense of the lack of knowledge the the reporter has on the matter....

    Have a nice day hehe!

    --
    Here we go again!
  93. And these guys promise me security? by startled · · Score: 2

    From the article:

    "We've already looked at this area."

    He said his company had built defensive measures into its products that would make them invulnerable to such an attack. However, he said he was unwilling to be specific about the nature of the security system, because such information would be valuable to someone who was attempting to break the security of the Atmel smart cards.

    Great! They've solved the problem by adding a thin layer of obscurity! I feel secure now.

  94. OOps wrong article by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

    Awww, I thought those blew up too, just like the buckeyball-tubules....

  95. Rev Eng by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "By sequentially changing the values of the transistors used to store information, they were able to "reverse engineer" the memory address map, allowing them to extract the secret information contained in the smart card."

    Forgive me, but shouldnt these guys be in jail, or in court for this?

  96. Photography by UnAmericanPunk · · Score: 1

    So what would they do, take a a picture of the card and watch all the 0's and 1's fly out?

    --
    Question everything that you've accepted without thinking.
  97. It's NOT Mr. Anderson... by beelzbozo · · Score: 1

    It's Neo.

  98. We fixed it, but we can't tell you how! by tweakt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "He said his company had built defensive measures into its products that would make them invulnerable to such an attack. However, he said he was unwilling to be specific about the nature of the security system, because such information would be valuable to someone who was attempting to break the security of the Atmel smart cards."

    If it's secure, but only because noone knows how it works, then it's inherently *NOT* secure. When will they learn?

    OBSCURITY IS NOT SECURITY

    *sigh*

    1. Re:We fixed it, but we can't tell you how! by Alsee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OBSCURITY IS NOT SECURITY

      Once again, someone taking a piece of truth and misapplying it.

      Obscurity is an excellent additional layer of defence.

      An example: Take any well known strong encryption, say Triple-DES. Thousands of people have spent thousands of hours studying it and analyized the best attacks against it. I guarantee some organizations have built special hardware to crack it. They grab a message, feed it into the NSA ultra-parallel computer and *BING* 24 hours later an answer pops out.

      Now, lets say I use triple-DES but then I add a piece of crap insecure custom encryption on top. Heck, even a ROT-13 layer would cause dedicated hardware to barf. Now the million man-hours of triple-DES research and your billion-dollar super computer are completely useless until someone invests the time to crack my personal encryption layer. It doesn't matter if the "obscure" layer is insecure. If a million people use a million obscure custom encryptions, the time you invest breaking one does you no good when you get to the next.

      Security through obscurity is only flawed when it is your primary line of defense.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  99. Roman day with the ring as a symbol will come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    We don't live in a perfect world. So why would everyone want everything accessible in one place?
    I see the future where the rich people create all these smart card gadgets to eventually be beating and out smarted by criminals, bums, and hackers.

    Don't lose hope bums and hackers, soon one day we will come to power. The world will be ours again. ::evil grin:: /yeah baby shag a-dealous

    Til then I can't wait for my cool ibutton ring that will show my change in mood, unlock all my doors, and bring back the roman days when they had the wax and ring as a symbol of wealth.

    As I look into my crystal ball, I see the future with everyone wearing a ring that has all personal records. The ring will also unlock every door I own (car, house...etc). People will want convience and it will have its price.

    Here's to the future - www.ibutton.com/ibuttons/images/javaring.jpg

  100. Um by scrytch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someone grabs your smartcard, why wouldn't they just *use* it. Or call the credit card company, tell them they're you, pass their rigourous security screening questions like asking for your social security number, and get a new card. Social engineering is a lot easier than tunnelling a flash with a microscope.

    Jesus ... it's a *key*. That's why you keep keys safe. Someone grabs my keys (those little jangly jagged metal things), they can use them, and if they have key duplicating equipment, they can duplicate my keys. Big deal.

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    1. Re:Um by CyberLife · · Score: 1

      Granted, you have a point about social engineering. However, the general concept behind smart card technology is to create a "key" that is unusable by anyone other than its rightful owner. This can be done using PINs, biometric data, etc. Anybody can make duplicates of the card, but forging a person's memories or retinal patterns is more difficult.

  101. Romans with their rings as a symbol will come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    We don't live in a perfect world. So why would everyone want everything accessible in one place?
    I see the future where the rich people create all these smart card gadgets to eventually be beating and out smarted by criminals, bums, and hackers.

    Don't lose hope bums and hackers, soon one day we will come to power. The world will be ours again. ::evil grin:: /yeah baby shag a-dealous

    Til then I can't wait for my cool ibutton ring that will show my change in mood, unlock all my doors, and bring back the roman days when they had the wax and ring as a symbol of wealth.

    As I look into my crystal ball, I see the future with everyone wearing a ring that has all personal records. The ring will also unlock every door I own (car, house...etc). People will want convience and it will have its price.

    Here's to the future - www.ibutton.com/ibuttons/images/javaring.jpg

  102. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Doesn't this attack require you to have physical posession of the card, and doesn't it destroy the card in the process? Doesn't sound like much of a security hole for GSM phones to me. When was the last time you loaned out your smart card to a criminal, and didn't mind getting it back disassemble? Now it is a serious security hole for the smart cards used for decrypting sattelite television...

  103. "Smart" by hysterion · · Score: 2

    Smart Cards
    Smart Tags
    Smart Devices
    Smart Clients
    Smart Phone
    Smart Thinking
    Smart Display
    Smart Interface Pointers
    Smart Clip Art
    Smart Online Business
    Smart Downloading
    Smart Worker Seminars
    At this point, wouldn't it be prudent to just quit using that word for anything to do with computers?

  104. Bricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That loud thud you just heard was the collective DirecTV Signal Integrity Unit having a bowel movement.

  105. Technical details, including photos by Introspective · · Score: 1

    ... are in a 1.3 Mb PDF paper by security guru Ross Anderson here

  106. Encrypt the Data by jtshaw · · Score: 1

    I have to say, having developed a product with smart cards, this is pretty interesting.

    However, we aren't stupid, we encrypted the data... so it won't get them much. I suggest others do the same thing, and pretty much expect that they have.

  107. Full technical report by SirTech · · Score: 1

    Here is the article: Optical Fault Induction Attacks.

    Abstract:
    We describe a new class of attacks on secure microcontrollers and smartcards. Illumination of a target transistor causes it to conduct, thereby inducing a transient fault. Such attacks are practical; they do not even require expensive laser equipment. We have carried them out using a flashgun bought second-hand from a camera store for $30. As an illustration of the power of this attack, we developed techniques to set or reset any individual bit of SRAM in a microcontroller. Unless suitable countermeasures are taken, optical probing may also be used to induce errors in cryptographic computations or protocols, and to disrupt the processor's control flow. It thus provides a powerful extension of existing glitching and fault analysis techniques. This vulnerability may pose a big problem for the industry, similar to those resulting from probing attacks in the mid-1990s and power analysis attacks in the late 1990s.

    We have therefore developed a technology to block these attacks. We use self-timed dual-rail circuit design techniques whereby a logical 1 or 0 is not encoded by a high or low voltage on a single line, but by (HL) or (LH) on a pair of lines. The combination (HH) signals an alarm, which will typically reset the processor. Circuits can be designed so that single-transistor failures do not lead to security failure. This technology may also make power analysis attacks very much harder too.

  108. Mute point by jtshaw · · Score: 1

    This is really nothing new. Anyone with some knowledge of circuits and a logic analyser has always been able to watch the data flow from the smart card. This will allow you to figure out the passwords, allow you to even snoop data, but still makes the smart card mostly useless outside the device. The reason being is Atmel smart cards use a challenge responce authentication protocol.

    Without getting into (unfortunetly I did sign a NDA at one point) I will tell you that it is good enough that just being able to snoop data isn't going to help you authenticate the card. They also have nice features that lock the cards after a certain amount of failed attempts and whatnot.

    That along with a little data encryption using whatever your favorite algorithm for security is and I would still feel confident in the security behind smart cards.

    Basically, Atmel leaves it up to the developer to decide how secure the cards are, but if you enable all there security features, and use a little common sense you will be fine.

    What I don't understand is why they can't just post the authentication system specfics on there web site for everyone to see. Security by obscurity isn't neccesary here as the algorithm itself wouldn't help anyone anyway.