Slashdot Mirror


Google Experiments

gafferted writes "The boffins at google have been experimenting with new toys, such as Keyboard Shortcuts and glossary, but most fun is Google Sets. Try "green, purple, red" to get a set of 40 different colours. Try a set that contains both Richard Stallman and Bill Gates, see what google associates with Slashdot or ask for a set of rude words."

186 comments

  1. OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but you've Slashdotted google!#*(@Q$#^$

    wow.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
    1. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by HiQ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you find Google in the Google cache???

    2. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you're fucking original. good job karma whore.

    3. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Drakin · · Score: 1

      *raspy breathing*

      Never underestimate the power of slashdot my apprentice.

    4. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 1

      Green really isn't your color, Mr AC.

      --
      Janie took my gun...
    5. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by ultrasound · · Score: 0

      Try the intersection of google labs and 100,000 slashdot users - Its an empty set.

    6. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the Google ca...

      Crap.

      Nevermind...

    7. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      And its only 6:am PST, the folks at google labs are going to have a busy morning ahead of them hehehehe.
      Wonder if they get in at 9:00? Quite likely the pagers are going off all over the valley right now .

      --
      music lover since 1969
    8. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Kredal · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually you can. The funniest thing about it is the standard disclaimer, "Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page, nor responsible for it's content.

      To wit: http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:zsbOtgGsZtYC: www.google.com/+google&hl=en&ie=UTF8

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    9. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      i find it hard to believe that this was the result of a 5 minute slashdotting... google's lab server is all that is down

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    10. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Google Labs FAQ:

      "What happened to that cool thing I was playing around with last week?
      The prototypes on Google Labs are meant to be low maintenance experiments. If one disappears it may be because no
      one was interested enough to use it, it wasn't stable enough for users to try it out, or it was so wildly successful that
      heavy usage brought the server to its knees. While that particular application may not reappear, there should be
      something equally interesting to replace it shortly."

    11. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by FreeMath · · Score: 2

      It's been my .sig for a while now.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    12. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by sameerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if its possible to slashdot Slashdot. Now that google has fallen its time to go for the ultimate.

    13. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Deven · · Score: 2

      ...but you've Slashdotted google!#*(@Q$#^$

      wow.


      This wasn't a production service. Google's production search engine is on a massive server farm that already takes so many hits that "slashdotting" Google probably wouldn't even be a blip on the radar. This wasn't even a beta service not in full production yet. The only thing that got Slashdotted was a single machine setup for experimental services. Since the services were purely experimental, they were NOT designed to take a production load. Of course a single box runnning experimental code can be Slashdotted. If they ever decide to turn any of these experimental services into production ones, you can bet the production platform won't be so easily brought down.

      You think you can Slashdot Google? Feel free to try! Let me know when www.google.com is down. Taking down an experimental service is meaningless. (And might discourage them from offering experimental services for you to play with!)

      --

      Deven

      "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

    14. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      Google already gets /.ed whenever any site gets /.ed.

      The primary server goes down, and for the rest of the day, we just hammer Google's cache. They must really love that...

      --
      -twb
    15. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but you've Slashdotted google!#*(@Q$#^$

      You can google Slashdot,

      and you can slashdot Google,

      but you can't slashdot Slashdot,

      and you can't google Google!

    16. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by egreB · · Score: 1

      I don't think they care much. I read somewhere that Google has an average of 30% resource utilization, and it has never been more than 80%. I love Google.

    17. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by colmore · · Score: 2

      Seriously though, I'd like to thank Google for running a web service the way I would, were I given the chance. They don't half-ass the thing.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    18. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's a great cache. I didn't actually know about that little Dilbert/Google collaboration

  2. Don't worry! by ringbarer · · Score: 4, Informative

    It looks like the only machine that's melted is the lab1.google.com one. I'm just dreading what the Slashdot effect is going to do to that poor Voice Search phoneline!

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    1. Re:Don't worry! by Suhas · · Score: 0

      Why is everything getting slashdotted today???

    2. Re:Don't worry! by scm · · Score: 1
      I'm just dreading what the Slashdot effect is going to do to that poor Voice Search phoneline!

      I called. It's slashdotted.

  3. How about this set... by doc_traig · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... "Google" and "Jumps the Shark"?

    - DDT

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
    1. Re:How about this set... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winner!

    2. Re:How about this set... by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      Google got mentioned by Michael Barone of 'U.S. News and World Report' on 'Fox News with Brit Hume' last night. (Brit pointed out that it's an EXCELLENT Search Engine.)
      If that's not 'jumping the shark', I don't know what is...

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
  4. Google Blog by nob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're a huge Google fan (and aren't we all) check out Google Weblog. They had this story 2 days ago, plus they keep you up to date on other cool Google happenings.

    And no, it's not my site. I just think it's cool.

    --
    daed si luap
    1. Re:Google Blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... I've seen a lot of truly pointless things on the web and sites that have made me cringe because of the fact that it's a blatant waste of time. But I have to admit, this is truly one of the saddest ones I've seen so far. As the site says on the bottom, it's not affiliated in google in any way. Yup, this site was created by a few people who spend a lot of their weekends hanging around at the Google HQ and pressing for hot insider info that they can post on their weblog... archiving the latest fucking new feature that has been implemented in the search engine. They even record the damn logos!

    2. Re:Google Blog by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      If you're a huge Google fan (and aren't we all) check out Google Weblog.

      One of the links they provided was for info on Google's new Find Anything service...check it out.

      (Smiley captioning for the humor-impaired: sed "s/out./out. :-)/g")

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  5. Amazing! by phunhippy · · Score: 1, Troll

    I put in: Slashdot & penis and it bombed!!

    :)

    1. Re:Amazing! by Peyna · · Score: 2

      /. and penisbird would have been more appropriate. I'm waiting for poor lil lab1 to come back up so I can try natalie portman and hot grits myself.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Amazing! by julesh · · Score: 1

      Whoah. It's not just google. I tried to download this comment and found slashdot slashdotted...

  6. Great... by Nachtfalke · · Score: 2, Funny

    The one time I actually want to read what the story's about, and the webserver is down...

  7. Foo in glossary search by CoolVibe · · Score: 2

    See here. Who wouldn't want to be a Forward Observation Officer in the navy? :)

  8. Fark-like Not Safe For Work by heliocentric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work at a place that is kind of touchy about content served up to those who signed the agreement to be allowed online, and that link to rude words I think needs one of the fark "Not Safe For Work" things after it.

    Yeah, the thing doesn't link to boobies, but grepping for incoming text vs. grepping for inbound boobies is a tad easier for log generation.

    Besides, I thought rude words just involved being insensitive, not foul.

    --
    Wheeeee
    1. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fark smells. It's all like "hahaha we suck!"

    2. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by arkanes · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you may be the coolest person I ever met, because you used the phrase "grepping for inbound boobies". I need a bumper sticker of that or something.

    3. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I work at a place that is kind of touchy about content...
      Besides, I thought rude words just involved being insensitive, not foul.

      sheesh. Don't be such a fucking chicken.

    4. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sheesh. Don't be such a fucking chicken.

      There was a guy at my job who got canned a month ago for going to The Onion.. no joke

    5. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by phyxeld · · Score: 1

      I've never understood the NSFW thing on fark. Do you actually work somewhere where it's OK to surf fark and slashdot but it ISN'T ok to see a nipple here and there? Everytime someone forgets the NSFW bit on fark, theres people bitching (biatching, rather) about how fark got them in trouble for linking to porn... I find it hard to imagine a boss saying "it was ok you were wasting time on fark, but you'd better not be looking at porn!".

      (I work somewhere where fark AND porn are ok. as long as shit gets done, i'm free to use the t1 as I see fit... if only the pay was decent it would be a perfect job!)

      Also, my slashdot ego demands I point out that I mentioned this on slashdot before the story was posted. (a friend sent me the link from k10k)

      Also, also, I think there's something wrong with slashcode... The preview comment page shows this comment dated Tuesday May 21, @05:00PM and the comment I'm replying to dated Wednesday May 22, @05:27AM. That can't be right. (It's currently 10:15am, Wed 5/22... We'll see what the posted timestamp says)

      --
      __
      Choose mnemonic identifiers. If you can't remember what mnemonic means, you've got a problem. - Larry Wall
    6. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by bughunter · · Score: 2
      Do you actually work somewhere where it's OK to surf fark and slashdot but it ISN'T ok to see a nipple here and there?

      No, probably not. I work in a similar place, and would appreciate a similar caveat.

      Most of the time, a few four letter words or off color jokes are fine. Nobody scans the content of every page that comes thru the proxy.

      But if they decided they needed something to use against us, or if we somehow ticked off the BOFH, then we're hosed.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    7. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
      I work somewhere where fark AND porn are ok. as long as shit gets done, i'm free to use the t1 as I see fit... if only the pay was decent it would be a perfect job!

      You're allowed to spend your time (and company resources) surfing for p0rn, and you wonder why the pay isn't decent?

      Geez. Glad you don't work here. :=)

  9. Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by gdav · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am in awe.

    I fed it Hugh, Pugh and Barney Mcgrew - and it gave the right answer.

    It can't be far from becoming self-aware.

    george

    1. Re:Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by CoolVibe · · Score: 2, Funny
      > It can't be far from becoming self-aware.

      When it starts spouting "I am." at every query, start getting worried :)

    2. Re:Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by Rupert · · Score: 2

      I'd be more impressed if the #2 result was "Deedle-dee doop dee deedly doo, deedly deedly deedly doo"

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    3. Re:Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      OK, give us a hint - what do you consider to be the "right" answer?

    4. Re:Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the Trumpton theme but isn't that Roobarb and Custard?

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    5. Re:Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by Rupert · · Score: 2

      No, that was deedle-dee doo, deedle-dee doo, deedle-dee doop dee-doo.

      The Trumpton theme was the tune played out on the clock tower. I can't remember how that went either.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
  10. Google is teh win! by mbbac · · Score: 1

    Google rules. I really like the keyboard shortcuts they've implemented. Having them at my disposal may make me use Mozilla more often on my Mac -- at least until OmniWeb has W3C DOM support up to snuff.

    --

    mbbac

  11. Obviously broken by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wonder it is still beta, it associates Rob Malda with RMS and Bill Gates!

    Richard Stallman
    Bill Gates
    Linus Torvalds
    Larry Wall
    Bruce Perens
    Eric Raymond
    Steve Jobs
    Brian Behlendorf
    Chris Dibona
    Larry Augustin
    Rob Malda
    Michael Tiemann
    Randal Schwartz
    Jamie Zawinski

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Obviously broken by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      "One of these things is not like the other..."

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Obviously broken by great_flaming_foo · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know, "Browser" isn't really a color is it.

    3. Re:Obviously broken by Heironymus+Coward · · Score: 1

      the glossary is broken, too.

      type "google" in the glossary and it talks about itself. fair enough, but shouldn't it give you the mathematical definition of "google" as well?

    4. Re:Obviously broken by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2
      Yeah, same thing. I entered "Linux Torvalds, Richard Stallman, Eric Raymond" and it gives me "Bill Gates" ?!! I think the algorithm needs a bit of fine tuning! otoh it did pick a lot of other members of the 'open-source community' too. And at least it didn't return Larry Ellison anywhere..

      Oh shit, it just gets worse.. "Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox and Donald Becker" also returns Bill Gates as the third in the list! You're telling me Bill has been hacking the linux kernel too?!! (or perhaps this is the real reason why he's so reluctant to reveal any more Windows source code)

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    5. Re:Obviously broken by szap · · Score: 1

      Nope. You're looking for 'googol' (10^100), which the google's glossary can't find. Yet. It points to dictionary.com which did, though.

  12. slashdot rude words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "see what google associates with Slashdot or ask for a set of rude words."

    Google assiciates rude words with Slashdot, but i think the sysadmins were typing them in manually for each query i made while their servers were grinding to a slasdotted halt.

  13. slashdotted ... by myster0n · · Score: 1

    just when I wanted to enter the set : Natalie Portman, hot grits, petrified.

    If someone gets through, please post the results.

    --
    Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
  14. This google set is amazing! by codexus · · Score: 1

    I typed: luke, han, leia and chewie and I got all the other charcters including minor ones like admiral ackbar !!! Now if only it wasn't /.ed maybe I could get Star Trek characters :)

    --
    True warriors use the Klingon Google
  15. other LABS servers by phunhippy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems that in addition to labs1

    there is also labs.google.com
    labs2.google.com
    labs3.google.com

    labs front page works(right now) the rest don't, and links off of labs, try to go to labs1 and crash and burn...

  16. google cache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    looks like googles slashdotted, someone find a cache of the page on google!

  17. In case it's slashdotted by jweatherley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dilbert Google Doodle

    Web Images Groups Directory
    ______________________
    | | <- Google search
    |______________________|

    o Advanced Search
    o Preferences
    o Language Tools

    New! Advertise with Google's cost-per-click AdWords Select.

    Advertise with Us - Search Solutions - News and Resources - Jobs, Press, Cool Stuff...

    ©2002 Google - Searching 2,073,418,204 web pages

    Damn lameness filter won't let you have a joke so forgive the junk:
    # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

    --

    --
    Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  18. What's wrong with the world? by ilyag · · Score: 1

    Google -- slashdotted... O my God.

    What? It's not in Google's cache!

    I guess we need an alternative search/caching engine for this very case...

    ;)

    1. Re:What's wrong with the world? by rabidphilosophy · · Score: 1

      I'm positive that a google cache of google would break the internet.

      --
      God sucks at running this place. Impeach God at
  19. So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean they will fix their search engine so that it works? Right now a search of something like "where to buy" or even +"where to buy" will tell you that 'where' and 'to' are common words and not included in the search, which of course completly loses the whole point of searching on a phrase (their FAQ says this should work properly, but in fact it works as I've indicated)

    1. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by iuyterw · · Score: 1

      That's simply not true.
      When's the last time you used Google?

    2. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acck!!! I just tried this again and today it IS working correctly. It was wrong just yesterday (and every other time I've tried it before today) (honest, it was). Maybe they did fix it.

    3. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has been indexing common words for a while, if you really want to get this, just do:

      "+where +to buy"
      See?

    4. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yes, it is true. I just tried Google itself, and yes that is working (now). But try groups.google.com with say a search on:

      "where to buy" wool socks

      entered just as shown (I cut and pasted from the google search) and you get :

      Advanced Groups Search Groups Help
      The following words are very common and were not included in your search: where to. [details]

      Google itself was doing his yesterday.

    5. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to force it to use one of those words, use a + before it, ie +where +to buy wool socks.

      People should actually read the help Google provides before complaining about what it can't do. There's an incredible number of options available for the advanced searcher.

    6. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did read the help. It's wrong, as I clearly stated. People should learn to read a post before complaining about what is said.

      From groups.google.com after searchin on "where to buy":

      Automatic Exclusion of Common Words

      Google ignores common words and characters such as "where" and "how", as well as certain single digits and single letters, because they tend to slow down your search without improving the results. Google will indicate if a common word has been excluded by displaying details on the results page below the search box.

      If a common word is essential to getting the results you want, you can include it by putting a "+" sign in front of it. (Be sure to include a space before the "+" sign.)

      Another method for doing this is conducting a phrase search, which simply means putting quotation marks around two or more words. Common words in a phrase search (e.g., "where are you") are included in the search.

      Notice that the above indicates that "where to buy" should work and is indicating this after clicking on the 'details' link after the search told me it was excluding those words because they are 'common'.

    7. Re:So are they going to fix ignoring common words? by raygundan · · Score: 1

      It is pretty annoying. In the meantime, to get both phrases and required (but common) words to work, try "+where +to +buy", which seems to work.

      Of course, now you can't really search for terms that start with "+", even if you group them in quotes.

  20. Very Impressive by nemesisj · · Score: 5, Informative

    I spent a couple hours playing with google labs last night and one of the most impressiev things (to me) was how I put in 3 bands:

    Nirvana
    Alice in Chains
    Pearl Jam

    and received one of the most accurate lists of other grunge and hard rock/heavy bands back that I've seen. To be able to build such a list on something as subjective as music is very impressive, and shows you just how good the quality of google's algorithms are.

    1. Re:Very Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but how good is it new stuff like RAPCORE!?

      Or, hrm, I wonder if I type in the names of hot chicks I like, if it'll give me names of other hot chicks I might like! Best porn search tool EVER!

    2. Re:Very Impressive by justruss · · Score: 1

      To be able to build such a list on something as subjective as music is very impressive, and shows you just how good the quality of google's algorithms are.

      not that it's not impressive, but i think there is both a lot of info around the web to group music by, and it is well-categorized by all the people who want to identify themselves by their music choices.

      amazon suggests some really interesting music and books for me, and they have a lot less to go on.

      russ

    3. Re:Very Impressive by nemesisj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe I should have clarified a little more. Amazon's suggestions never work for me, because I like old school, early nineties grunge and they figure that music sort of falls into "heavy" and "not heavy" categories. So I'm constantly reccomended stuff by Metallica, System of a Down, Primus, etc which are all heavy bands, but which don't fit the particular vein of heavy music I like. Google also made the jump to returning Godsmack, which is a newer hardcore band with a lot of grunge fundamentals (which I like) and Tool, and artsier, more emo-influenced heavy band, but still with grunge influences and ties. I don't think Godsmack would ever refer to themselves as grunge, but the connection exists, and google figured it out. Extremely impressive - after all, this is a highly subjective subject area, but one that still has some overall generalizations to it.

    4. Re:Very Impressive by Mignon · · Score: 2
      I like old school, early nineties grunge

      You know you're old when people referring to the early nineties as old school makes you roll your eyes...

    5. Re:Very Impressive by dr_eaerth · · Score: 1

      It fails with more complex bands, however. I put in four bands:

      Caravan
      Camel
      Soft Machine
      Matching Mole

      Google failed to provide even one more Canterbury band (or prog band). Though comes up with something if I add a popular progrock band, like King Crimson, to the mix.

  21. Catalog Search by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also try the beta for Google's Catalog Search

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Catalog Search by eples · · Score: 2

      Awesome! I found over 346 different types of Beer Mugs with just one search! Technology is amazing.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    2. Re:Catalog Search by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Wow! So they added OCR just like that? :)
      Impressive stuff indeed.

      You start to wonder what's left to search?

      Even a Catalog Search for 'Slashdot' gave a few results. ;)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Catalog Search by mosch · · Score: 2
  22. Slashdotted!? No problem! by SplendidIsolatn · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Damn, seems the page has been Slashdotted. No biggie, I'll just check out the Google cache...

    Oh..wait...

    --
    sig--we don't need no goddamn sig
  23. Re:first porn, goobers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, if you were like on usenet in 1996, you remember that story about Diff'rent strokes, the best line of it being WOO WOO I GET SPANKING?

    I really want a copy of that one, if you could find it, I would much appreciate it.

  24. Goodbye, everything by seanmeister · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the Google Labs FAQ:

    5. What happened to that cool thing I was playing around with last week?

    The prototypes on Google Labs are meant to be low maintenance experiments. If one disappears it may be because no one was interested enough to use it, it wasn't stable enough for users to try it out, or it was so wildly successful that heavy usage brought the server to its knees. While that particular application may not reappear, there should be something equally interesting to replace it shortly.

    So after today's /.ing, are they going to replace the entire lab site?

    1. Re:Goodbye, everything by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      Earlier in the FAQ:

      3. What will happen to these experiments over time? That depends in part on you. Your comments and the feedback from other users could elevate a project to consideration for integration into Google.com. Other demos may disappear and never be spoken of again.

      Might be worth telling them (on their Google Boards dedicated to the labs) that we actually like it and just don't abuse it for fun.

      Or perhaps that's just what we're doing. :)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  25. Violation of 3rd Commandment? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    This must definitely be a violation of the 3rd commandment!

    I mean...

    OFMG: Oh, f*ck my God?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. Artificial intelligence ? by cstar · · Score: 0

    The google set is very impressive. I feel some premises of AI.
    There has been some experiments to teach a computer that water is wet and fire is hot then make clever deductions.
    Google has this knowledge somewhere in it's database.
    One day, Google (or someone else, though Google is at the right place) will answer questions not only by sending a list of relevant site but by making up the answer just for you.
    (You're working on that, aren't you, Googlers ?)

    --
    No brain, no headache
    1. Re:Artificial intelligence ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rember the computer in Terminator?

  27. Try the voice search! by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I discovered the voice search yesterday (and submitted it but was rejected... but that's not the point). It was pretty fun - since it's slashdotted, though, I'll mention that it worked for me: when I said "The Simpsons," it gave results for "The Simpsons" and "The Sims," which is understandable. Somebody else did a search for "ISDN" and got results for "ISDN" as well as "ISBN." The last search was for "Corvette," which gave a lot of results that contained "Court of" in the title, but the sidebar on the right (the paid sponsors) had links to Corvette sites.

    So, bookmark that site and someday in the future, when it is not slashdotted, try the voice search! It's not a toll-free number, but the coolness factor is well worth it. I don't know where it would be really useful (you still need a web browser to view the results), except in the case where you know how to pronounce a word but not how to spell it.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:Try the voice search! by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this would be useful in the field of accesaibility? This coupled with a synthesized voice, could also lead to some interesting hands-free browsing. For example in cars.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  28. My favorite Google betas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the web APIs and the especially cool (money making!) Ask Google.

    1. Re:My favorite Google betas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, um, stupid Ask Slashdot threw me off... it's Google Answers. Guess I should've checked my links first.

  29. Keys... by mbbac · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Google were smart they'd use the w, a, s, d keys instead of i, j, k, l. My fingers automatically go to wasd after many, many games of Quake 3 -- and many other games using the same engine. :)

    --

    mbbac

    1. Re:Keys... by sconest · · Score: 2

      They must have thought of azerty keyboard users.
      Afaik, i,j,k,l are at the same place on every keyboard.

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    2. Re:Keys... by aallan · · Score: 2

      They must have thought of azerty keyboard users. Afaik, i,j,k,l are at the same place on every keyboard.

      MY guess is that they picked i, j, k & l since they are the cursor keys in vi. These days all keyboard have a numeric keypad, with cursor keys, way back when this wasn't always the case...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    3. Re:Keys... by iainl · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they are lefties. Some of us use the mouse in our left hand, keyboard in the right. Most of the time I end up with simple cursor keys when doing this, but ikjl gets you more surrounding keys for when you need to bind tons of things.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    4. Re:Keys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, h, j, k & l are the cursor keys in vi and I'm just a little annoyed that they didn't get it right.

    5. Re:Keys... by aallan · · Score: 2

      Actually, h, j, k & l are the cursor keys in vi and I'm just a little annoyed that they didn't get it right.

      Mea culpa. That shows you how long its been since I got stuck infront of a machine with a totally fubar'ed keyboard map and no other editor but vi. Oh, how times have changed...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    6. Re:Keys... by br0ck · · Score: 1

      I posted the following to the google.public.labs.keyboard-shortcuts newsgroup:

      First, I think this feature is great!

      It looks like almost everyone has a different preference for navigation keys. Would it be possible to personalize the navigation keys? Perhaps you could have a form for the user to match each feature to a key and then save the settings to a cookie. I personally found the current configuration to be ok, but I would be more comfortable with other layouts I've seen suggested like VI or the 3D shooter default of WASD. Perhaps you could just have 5 layouts and a user could pick the one they like the most?

      Also, I second the motion mentioned in another post to allow opening in a new window. How about shift-enter to open the link in a new window and shift-C to open the cached article in a new window?

    7. Re:Keys... by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

      You should try it in Dvorak. :)
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    8. Re:Keys... by Jeremi · · Score: 2
      MY guess is that they picked i, j, k & l since they are the cursor keys in vi.


      That's h, j, k, & l to you, buddy. 'i' is used to enter insert mode.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    9. Re:Keys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      btw, who IDIOT invented those counterintuitive yet still ubiquitous i,j,k,l in vi etc? what's wrong with e,s,d,x?

    10. Re:Keys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and before anyone starts nitpicking, hjkl is equally braindamaged.

  30. Ah, for the days when a search engine worked by silverbax · · Score: 0, Troll

    I really miss the old 'quick and dirty' Alta Vista...Google is still substandard.

    1. Re:Ah, for the days when a search engine worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I loved AltaVista back in the day, Google does everything AltaVista did for me and more.

      Is there something in particular you've found you can't do?

    2. Re:Ah, for the days when a search engine worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try www.altavista.com, Google is better though.

  31. Pair o' Ducks by obtuse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google caches sites that don't cache themselves, but Google doesn't cache itself.

    Shouldn't Google cache itself?

    I am Russell.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  32. "Interestingly" relevance for machine learning by ariels · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the spirit of automated classification and machine learning, I
    tried searching for a set containing "boosting", "SVM" and "bagging"
    (without "bagging", nothing new is found; another problem).

    Results: "SVM", "Bagging", "Boosting", "stacking" and "Other methods".

    Clicking on either of the 2 new links ("stacking" or "Other methods")
    takes me to the normal Google search on the term. This is of course
    not useful -- I need the terms in the machine learning context, which I
    cannot get.

    Especially in the case of "Other methods", it would be nice to be able
    to get to the page Google had in mind...

    --
    2 dashes and a space, or just 2 dashes?
  33. Small set feature failure by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Informative
    When I played with this yesterday, I noticed that the "small set" option has a tendency to turn up no results on certain queries that return a few replies for the "large set" option.

    For example, try entering "Frank Welker", "Don Messick", and "Maurice LaMarche" (all cartoon voice actors). Under "small set", you get back nothing but a failure page that implies you need to change the terms to get results. The failure page doesn't even have the "expand your search" link that successful small set searches have. But if you use "large set", you get back 3 additional items (well under the 15 item set limit of a small set).

    1. Re:Small set feature failure by Kelerain · · Score: 1

      I think the issue you are talking about was that they arent talking about results exactly. Its that you dont EXPECT that this set has very many items (15 or less) and that changes how the search works. for example if you wanted to know about all the doom games its a small set. But if you were looking for info on first person shooters thats a larger set. It doesnt mean that the small set WILL return few links (although likely) but it searches in a different way. At least thats how I saw it.

  34. Re:Today's Quote (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I come from a small town whose population never changed. Each time a woman got pregnant, someone left town. -- Michael Prichard

    What happened when someone died then?


    We brought in more chinese labor for the railroad.

  35. Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funny! by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like an easter egg to me. :)

    Google's cache of www.google.com

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  36. amazing by Drath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow I entered Natalie Portman into google sets and i got 'hot grits' back!

  37. Re:Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not seeing the Easter egg... If you mean the dilbert logo, that's the actual logo series this week.

  38. Re:Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funn by gakguk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're talking about the Dilbert thing, it is by design.


    If you're talking about the language thing, it is your mother tongue. ;) (You know, the &hl=sv&ie=UTF8 part)

  39. labs.google.com was slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing!

  40. Kevin Bacon is now at a whole new level.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now you can connect him with everything in the universe.

  41. keyboard shortcuts by Petronius · · Score: 1

    Great idea, but odd key choices, IMO. Why not go with popular key sets like the vi-style keys or emacs-style keys, or better yet: make it user configurable?

    --
    there's no place like ~
  42. Bias to IE by sphealey · · Score: 2
    Most of the Google enhancements I have seen work only with Microsoft Internet Explorer. Since I switch among browsers as appropriate I find this annoying, as well as against the spirit of the Net.

    I can only hope that if AOL switches to Mozilla as their core code, and Google starts seeing millions of Mozilla hits, they might rethink this decision.

    sPh

    1. Re:Bias to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the IE toolbar, what doesn't work in Mozilla? If I'm missing something big, I guess I never noticed.

    2. Re:Bias to IE by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 0
      Since I switch among browsers as appropriate I find this annoying, as well as against the spirit of the Net.
      No one really cares what you find annoying. I'm sure the Google CEO is not sitting around saying, "Gee, I wonder what we can do to make sphealey happy today..."
    3. Re:Bias to IE by afidel · · Score: 2

      well since google just got a huge win with the awarding of a contract to power the searches on AOL/Time Warner properties and AOL's long term strategy is to use Gecko (the renderer from Mozilla) I think it would be apropriate for them to make sure that they work with said engine.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Bias to IE by brucet · · Score: 1


      I was pretty impressed that the keyboard shortcuts do work in Mozilla.

      And there is a version of the Google toolbar available here: http://googlebar.mozdev.org/

      What else is missing?

      -Bruce

  43. Re:Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funn by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    I was talking about the Dilbert thing.

    Yeah, I read all about that Dilbert thing afterwards by clicking on the logo. But it looked funny as I hadn't seen the logo before even if I'm a frequent Google visitor. :)

    Hmm... So you're saying I speak UTF8? Nah, that would be inefficient, requiring twice as long time to... Umm... Sorry, now I confused with Unicode again. *hides* :)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  44. keboard shortcut keys suck by sgtron · · Score: 1

    The idea is cool, but they should have used the vi keys instead. "I" means up? Yuck, everyone knows that's the insert key.. "K" means down? How ubout "K" means up like it's supposed to. C'mon, the vi keys are an accepted standard.

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
    1. Re:keboard shortcut keys suck by Debillitatus · · Score: 2
      vi is a curse.

      You have clearly generated bad karma in millions of your past lives.

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

    2. Re:keboard shortcut keys suck by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      "the vi keys are an accepted standard"

      By whom?! Certainly not me. :-)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  45. Re:Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funn by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    Oh, it's on the International Google! doh!

    Well, it got +4 Funny currently so someone must be amused. :)

    Or perhaps they're just amused by my stupidity. :(

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  46. rmap VM: about bloody time, OOM: booo by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

    The cursor keys in VI are hjkl!

    I too, would prefer awsd ;)

  47. from the mad-mad-scientists dept? by MrEd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd be pretty damn mad if my project got the slashdotting that this has brought down on labs1.google.com...

    --

    Wah!

  48. vi keys? You guys really are nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't believe it when I started reading all the suggestions that google should have chosen vi keys...because they are standards that almost everyone knows. Sheesh, what a group of idiots. You guys (posters) really are nerds out of touch with reality. There's a couple orders of magnitude more people on the internet familiar with keyboard shortcuts for windows products than there are who even know what vi is, much less remember the keys used by it. Use vi keys, hahahahahahaha.

  49. Google Labs by Snaller · · Score: 1


    Where the future is being made today!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  50. Kevin Bacon by rogerl · · Score: 1

    Anyone tried putting Kevin Bacon in a sets query. I would but the site is slashdotted...

  51. In place of these silly features by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I'd rather have the Google API allow me more than 10 results per search. Let's say you write something in Java which uses to Google API to archive postings of Slashdot Trolls. If you type in "Natalie Portman Hot Grits" into your web client, you may get back the following:

    1. Corporate Home of Portman's Tupperware Store
    2. XXX hot chimpanzees
    3. Quaker instant grits
    4. Gritty instant quakers
    5. Hot XXX babes
    6. Hot XXX gritty Instant Quakers
    7. Star wars collector mugs
    8. Hot deal on 100 grit sand paper
    9. Natalie Merchant Home Page
    10. IMDB: "True Grit" Starring John Wayne...
    If "Let's Dump Hot Grits Down Natalie Portman's Pants" is search result #11, you're fscked and have to result to screen scraping Google and using 3 times more of their bandwidth than you would have used if they dramatically increased the result limit.
    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    1. Re:In place of these silly features by EllF · · Score: 2

      Go to www.google.com. Click "Preferences". Change the drop-down box next to "Number of Results" from its default (10) to anything up to 100.

      This feature has been there for years.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    2. Re:In place of these silly features by scootr1 · · Score: 0

      Go to www.google.com. Click "Preferences". Change the drop-down box next to "Number of Results" from its default (10) to anything up to 100.

      I don't think that this will affect anyhting with the API - just personal html searches. The API hasn't "been there for years."

    3. Re:In place of these silly features by EllF · · Score: 1

      Ah, I misread. Blame it on replying just after waking up.

      Mea culpa. :)

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  52. Re:Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice that Google's cache of www.google.com comes with a disclaimer:

    Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

  53. Google in financial trouble? by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    I'm serious. They're desperately trying to come up with a way of making money that isn't going to completely alienate their users.

    They're clutching at all sorts of straws - google answers for example.

    1. Re:Google in financial trouble? by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2
      They're desperately trying to come up with a way of making money that isn't going to completely alienate their users.

      They're clutching at all sorts of straws - google answers for example.

      Google seems to me to be one of the most successful advertisers on the net. While they may not use evil pop-under ads, they have the AdWords system. Just because the ads aren't obtrusive, doesn't mean they're not there. I regularly use their ads to find online retailers for special-interest items, and like their search results, their ads tend to be very well-targeted to potential customers. I would not be at all surprised to find that Google makes a significant profit.
      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  54. Were the rude words necessary? by haslup · · Score: 1

    Hey, free speech is great and all, but what's up with the rude words at the end of that submission? Please... I'm sure at least 50 other people submitted this story in a way that's not offensive to many people. I hope everyone got their giggles out of it.

    jason

  55. lab1 down, but here's what it said about Slashdot by edstromp · · Score: 1

    Predicted Items --------------- Slashdot Kuro5hin Techdirt freshmeat The Register Linux org Linux Today Crack RC5 Van's Hardware osOpinion Debian Google Linux com Linux Journal Linux Gazette LinuxWorld Linux International NewsForge Linux Start tclug LinuxLinks com Linux Magazine Linux Magazin Linux Newsletter LinuxFocus Sys Admin Apache Week LinuxPlus Linux Post LinuxTone com Linux Berg Linux Ticker USA Today The Reg Segfault Linux Power Penguin Magazine MozillaZine KDE News SourceForge advogato news com Gnome News Kernel Traffic The Onion

  56. Terms of use by alexo · · Score: 1

    The Google Labs Terms of Use state:

    You also agree that you will not use any robot, spider, other automated device, or manual process to monitor or copy any content from the Site. (emphasis mine)

    Does it mean that revisiting the site is forbidden?

  57. Re:vi keys? You guys really are nerds by Kyont · · Score: 1

    Well, it's called "News for Nerds" now, innit? Besides, "k" and "i" are definitely not "down" and "up" in Windows either.

    --
    You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
  58. Ultimate Test by km790816 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The ultimate test: Jenna Jameson, Sylvia Saint, Houston, Chasey Lain, Christy Canyon

    ...and it passes with flying colors.

  59. In Case it Returns from "The Slashdotted Zone" by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny
    At the moment, http://labs.google.com/ is displaying this:
    Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.

    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience.

    I assume they've sent someone to fetch Stephen Wolfram so science may continue.

    This makes me wonder what Google will be like 10 years from now. Will they accidentally release a Lawnmower-Man-like entity onto the Internet and then categorically deny everything? Will they have to contribute to a special SuperFund for Internet pollution? Will we see cartoons of Men In Black spray-burning suspicious goo off the Google logo?

  60. "brittney's spears" and other misspelled searches by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    Here's a funny list of misspelled Google searches for "Britney Spears". Google was able to automatically spell-correct all of them. :-)

    Britney Spears

  61. "...never any real danger of it escaping..." by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2
    Google Labs now has a disclaimer explaining what has gone wrong:
    Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.

    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience.

    Good to know that there was no real danger! Sounds like a close call, though.
  62. Google's pulled the plug temporarily by alexburke · · Score: 2

    From the Google Labs page:

    Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.

    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience.

  63. Googe Sets precursor to Google AI? by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    I'm convinced that Google will become a giant AI. Google Sets seems like a small step towards machine understanding. The problem with older AI was bootstrapping their knowledge base. The Google AI systems will use the entire internet as an encyclopedia of self-correcting, peer-reviewed, continually-updated "facts". Suddenly, the problem of manual data entry for a AI system like Open Cyc is massively parallelized to the entire population of web users! Of course, the web is full of lies and self-promotion, but the web contains multiple voices, multiple "truths", that will create a general consensus using Google's PageRank algorithm.

  64. google is testing a keyboard sniffing application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google wants to see what you type in the search field before you hit the search button

  65. At least google lets us know: by SeanTobin · · Score: 1

    From Google's lab website:

    Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.
    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
  66. Re:"brittney's spears" and other misspelled search by PEdelman · · Score: 1

    Yet -- another cool feature I found out recently is that whenever your search query yields no results and google thinks you misspelled something, it automagically retries your query with the spell-checked result (and points very clearly out that it did so).

    Will these people never stop improving?

    --
    Like science? Comics? Wicked...
    Funny By Nature
  67. Nice Job fellow /.ers by pcmacman · · Score: 1
    "Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.

    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience."

  68. Googling for boobies by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

    Speaking of boobies (and I do like to speak of boobies), I was impressed by Google's completion of the set "hooters, knockers, fun bags":

    Google on boobies

    That's pretty impressive! I think it could pass the Turing test!

  69. Not that impressive by delphi125 · · Score: 1
    After the labs recovered from the assault, I tonight tried the surnames of a couple of cricketers: Brian LARA and Robert CROFT. I got the following results:

    Blaby, Coalville, Zulia, Nueva Esparta, Hinckley, M rida, Kott, Murkowski, Carabobo, Foster Chair, Davies, Sucre.

    I was expecting some kind of Tomb Raider stuff maybe, but these?

  70. Stunned by dorix · · Score: 1

    The site's back up, by the way.

    I tried a set, and the results blew my mind:

    Glass Tiger
    Men Without Hats
    Grapes Of Wrath

    All Canadian bands, all active in the 80's.

    I got 20 results back, including my original three -- all Canadian, and all but two active in the 80's (one released their first single in 1990, the other seems to have appeared around 1997 or so).

    I had to pick my jaw up off the floor!

  71. ohh, such tacos I will give by Kafteinn · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.

    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience.


    But you can still use it you just have to enter the variables manually Petting various animals

    --
    Hitler's in the fridge.
  72. Google Is Red Blooded Male by nine9ths · · Score: 1

    Try the large set for "Natalie Portman" "Sarah Michelle Gellar" and "Jessica Alba". Google has excellent taste in women.

  73. Needs a little work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that this feature doesn't do that well with the most intuitive of all sets. My first thought was to try some of the {natural #s}, {integers}, {complex #s}, ... Given 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Google gives more integers, but skips numbers and adds 0. (try the large set option and get "deleted" for an entry?). It ignores i and negative numbers entirely. But hey, neat trick overall.

  74. Google can count! by _bobs.pizza_ · · Score: 1

    enter 'one', 'two', 'three'

    and you get........................

    Three
    One
    Two
    Four
    FIVE
    SIX
    SEVEN
    EIGHT
    NINE
    TEN
    eleven
    twelve
    Thirteen
    None
    Fourteen

    lameness filter sucks, lameness filter sucks

  75. Quick theory on how Google Sets works by kindofblue · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm guessing that Google sets could work something like this.

    Each query phrase produces a set of documents, i.e. web pages. The intersection of those sets gives a small set of docs which is pretty much the same thing that a normal google query (or any search engine) will return, if all the queries are ANDed. Then the new feature is to find the intersection of all the terms from all the docs in the doc-intersection set. That is, return all the terms that are common to all the docs.

    e.g. in pseudo-code: Assume
    - G is the normal google search engine.
    - G.query("search phrase") returns a set of references (URLs) to docs, e.g. {u1, u2, u3, ...}.
    - u.terms() returns a set of all the words contained in the doc referenced by u, e.g. if u=="http://slashdot.org", then u.terms() == {"news", "for", "nerds", "slashdot", etc.}.
    - * is a set intersection operator.
    s1 = G.query(q1); s2=G.query(q2); s3=G.query(q3); ...
    docSets = s1 * s2 * s3 * ...; // so docSets contains the URLs of the docs that have all the query terms
    ws = docSets[0].terms(); // ws will contain the running intersection of the set of words in all the docs
    forall url in docSets { ws = ws * url.terms(); }
    return ws;

    So my guess is that ws is the final set of terms returned by the google set. Of course, the words should be sorted by some meaningful metric, e.g. frequency. This is all very easy to implement and can be done very quickly, because finding the document set intersection and the word set intersections can be done very quickly using sparse vectors to represent word or document vectors.

    1. Re:Quick theory on how Google Sets works by dorix · · Score: 1

      I thought at first it was something like this, but I think it's even a bit more complex than that.

      If you enter three or four band names, actors names, etc., then ws would likely contain extra words and phrases that are commonly found associated with whatever you entered, like "band", "discography", "movie", "filmography", etc. But none of these show up. That's the part that really impresses me.

      I think your theory is about the first 75-80% of what Google does, but it has to be doing some context interpretation to eliminate phrases that don't quite fit in.

  76. Catering to the largest market share by _bobs.pizza_ · · Score: 1

    I'd hate for them to cater to the largest market share. What are they trying to do, make money? By having google write enhancements for the masses, more people use google, so google makes more money.

    If you like an open source browser and want enhancements that you can't find, you write them yourselves.

  77. Cowboy Neal by asobala · · Score: 1

    Cowboy Neal
    Resort to watching TV
    Interact with my SO
    Improve my Perl foo
    Discover IRC
    Read SlashDot
    Haaaaated iiiiiiiit

  78. heres another good one.. by Prion86 · · Score: 1

    being the pervert that i am...i put in fuck, cunt, and tits. now, i must give google credit on this one, because it returned the 4 other dirty words you cant say on tv. looks like google bot is a geroge carlin fan too.

    --
    "Alot of people don't know what they are doing...and most are pretty good at it." -George Carlin
  79. Yvan Eht Nioj! by SendBot · · Score: 1

    Holy crap! I entered "red", "green", and "blue" and it came up with NAVY! I've already alerted the Mad Magazine building.

  80. "hate"+"crime"+"stubborn"="marriage" :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love Google.

  81. Re:"brittney's spears" and other misspelled search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see "broccoli spears" as a common misspelling

  82. Carlin's 7 dirty words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you click the link for rude words, then click "Shrink Set" you get George Carlin's 7 dirty words.

  83. fun with sponsored links - pimping w/ ebay by Tuross · · Score: 1

    So I took the rude words link from the article, then clicked on the word "snatch" which was one of the many returned similar words.

    Up came the following sponsored link:

    Snatch on eBay.
    Low Prices. - Thousands of Items!
    Buy or Sell on eBay.
    www.ebay.com.au
    Interest: =====---

    Interpret that however you like :)

    --
    Matt
    1. Read Slashdot
    2. ???
    3. Profit
  84. after 12 comes... by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

    DO! do-do-do-do-DO! do-do-do-do-do do DO! do-do-DO!
    (for fans of Sesame Street).

  85. Rob Malda's relative importance by admiralh · · Score: 1

    I guess the fact that Rob is listed above Bjarne Stroustrup shows just how far C++ has fallen.

    --
    Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
  86. Even Google doesn't know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Trombone
    * Terrapin
    * Lard

    [Predicted Items: None]

    Even Google doesn't know what to do with a trombone, a terrapin, and a half pound of lard!

  87. Good god, it's a genius! by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 1
    I enter a few of my favourite arcane spells from Dungeons and Dragons. Dispel Magic, Lightning Bolt and Fireball. It returns:

    Predicted Items:

    Fireball

    Dispel Magic

    Lightning Bolt

    Fly

    Haste

    Vampiric Touch

    Stinking Cloud

    Hold Person

    empty slot

    Web

    Clairvoyance

    Water Breathing

    It even manages to choose spells of the exact same spell level! I guess having the archives of rec.games.frp.dnd on Google Groups must really help :)

    Heck, it even guesses water type Pokémon correctly. Now that's what I call an interesting site.

  88. Where is the new Toolbar stuff at? by giveuptheghost · · Score: 1

    The story that ZDNet is carrying says that Google has also created some new experimental add-ons to the Google Toolbar:

    "The second page features experimental add-ons to Google's toolbar, a software download that lets people surfing the Web with Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser search the Google database through a persistent application built into the IE interface."

    And here are the descriptions of said add-ons:

    "One feature called 'browser control,' sure to raise eyebrows about Google's ambitions and direction, lets people suppress advertising pop-up windows that appear when the browser attempts to leave a Web site. The feature works by clearing the JavaScript event 'onUnload.'
    "Asked to clarify whether this browsing feature marked a departure from Google's traditional search mission, the Google representative would only say that 'it's something we're experimenting with to see if there's any level of demand or interest.'
    "Another experimental navigation feature, albeit with a more direct connection to search, helps Google toolbar users navigate through results with a 'next' and 'previous' button, eliminating the need to double back to the search results page.
    "A third toolbar experiment is a 'combined search' button, letting people search Google's image, newsgroup and general databases in combination."

    However, I looked on the Google Toolbar site, Google Labs, and even searched the web (with Google), and I couldn't find this "second page" that ZDNet's article mentioned.

    My question is, does anyone here know where the experimental add-ons for the Google Toolbar are at? Perhaps they are only for a private beta group (like the Folding@home Google Toolbar add-on)? Perhaps ZDNet's info isn't quite right?

    1. Re:Where is the new Toolbar stuff at? by takusi · · Score: 0

      I guess the article talks about this page. http://toolbar.google.com/experimental

      --
      rm /bin/laden
  89. sets not just an algorithm by vldmr_krn · · Score: 1

    Sets must involve some sort of manually maintained database which stores the categories in which different search terms belong. There's no way an algorithm could know that "Beggars in Spain" (a book) is in a different set than "Nancy Kress" (its author) otherwise. Also, query "Julian Jaynes" returns nothing, though the Google search engine finds around 3,000 pages with the term. If an algorithm alone was responsible for sets, this wouldn't make sense, but it makes sense if the Google staff who maintain the database never heard of Julian Jaynes.

  90. Google declares what's a religion and what's a cul by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 1

    If you're not on this list, google doens't think you're a religion, report immediately to the nearest deprogramming station! Presbyterian ,Hindu,Methodist,Jewish,Catholic, Baptist,Lutheran ,Episcopal,Christian,Buddhist,Ang lican,Pentecostal,Non Denominational,Christian Science,Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormon Islam United Methodist Nondenominational Education Nazarene Mennonite Unitarian Universalist Apostolic Calvary Chapel Scientology Islamic Roman Catholic Taoist Orthodox Congregational Quaker Muslim Jehovah's Witness Druid Angels Wiccan

  91. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, thanks, I did.

  92. everythings in perfect working order... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Predicted Items for
    "lame"

    mp3encoder
    Perl
    Icecast
    IceDJ
    PHP
    phorum
    liveCaster
    Apache
    Linux
    halting
    halt
    crippled

    seems fine to me.