Slashdot Mirror


Fake Light Sabers Making Real Cash

jdedman4 writes "The fanfare over Episode II brings with it absurdist prequel theories as well as this article from the Houston Chronicle detailing one fan-enterpreneur's success. In eight years, Forney, Texas resident Jeff Parks has made himself a millionaire by making customized light sabers for collectors. "My goal is to be the best light saber designer in the world," quips Parks."

240 comments

  1. How is he surviving? by Tim_F · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't he have to be a licensed Star Wars toy distributor?

    1. Re:How is he surviving? by two_stripe · · Score: 3, Funny

      The force is strong in this one *lightsaber hum*

    2. Re:How is he surviving? by alen · · Score: 2

      His sabers look different than the SW ones and I bet he doesn't call them light sabers. Article said the company name was arc wave. But I'm surprised why lucas hasn't come calling. They are very close to the SW light sabers. And wasn't it was star wars that started the whole laser sword thing?

    3. Re:How is he surviving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hardly. Archagnel Gabriel wields a sword of light. That good enough for you?

    4. Re:How is he surviving? by joshv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't he have to be a licensed Star Wars toy distributor?

      I imagine as long as he does not use any LucasFilm trademarks he is ok. My guess is that Lucas never bothered to trademark the lightsaber. Even if they did, on his web site Parks never refers to Star Wars, or the word "Light Saber" - it's just a "Parks Saber".

      I would also guess that this product is high end and niche enough that it does not directly compete with any officially licensed products. So it's unlike that LucasFilm would try to pursue the issue legally.

      -josh

    5. Re:How is he surviving? by Lord+Azrael · · Score: 1

      well, on his homepage it reads:

      Not associated with LUCASFILM LTD.(TM) or any LFL Ltd.(TM) Film or Franchise.
      All prop designs are original creations owned by Parks sabers, Inc.(TM)
      and or Jeffrey A. Parks.

      that sort of disclaimer should do the job

      --
      Lord "not Gargamel's Cat!" Azrael
    6. Re:How is he surviving? by Drakin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      laser swords have been part of space opera for a long time. not sure where they started, but it wasn't with lucas. Most of his ideas are borrowed anyway.

    7. Re:How is he surviving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly. Archagnel Gabriel wields a sword of light. That good enough for you?

      Gabriel wasn't an archangel (except in the bogus Koranic tradition). He also carried a horn. You're thinking of Michael (described as the "Archangel" in most writings up until the Mohammedans came along, suggesting that he's the only one).

    8. Re:How is he surviving? by Eravau · · Score: 1
      I would also guess that this product is high end and niche enough that it does not directly compete with any officially licensed products. So it's unlike that LucasFilm would try to pursue the issue legally.

      According to the article, the licensed light saber producer is Master Replicas . If you follow the link, you'll see their prices are just as "high end" as the ones featured in this article. So, yes, he's competing with an officially licensed product.

    9. Re:How is he surviving? by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

      Examples please?? I have never seen any other movie with anything close to resembling a light saber. I remember an "Electron Cutlass" from some an old TOS Star Trek comic, but it was esentially an electric metal sword, and that's about as close as I have seen anything to a lightsaber.

    10. Re:How is he surviving? by liquidweb · · Score: 1
      I find these videos of people using the lightsabers quite amusing. This guy needs help.



      http://www.masterreplicas.com/video/anakinmovhig h. asp

      --
      --- Matthew Hill
      "To quote the self is an act of the self riteous and uninitiated sub-moronic" - Matthew Hill
    11. Re:How is he surviving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gabriel wasn't an archangel (except in the bogus Koranic tradition).

      Uhhhhh... angels are bogus, dude.

    12. Re:How is he surviving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhhh... angels are bogus, dude.


      See ya in Hell, kid (from Heaven, of course).

      This message brought to you by the letters F and U.

    13. Re:How is he surviving? by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Space Opera is not limited to movies... Can't remember the titles off hand but I'm quite certain that I've read some old "pulp" sci fi from Pre 1976 that contained energy/laser swords.

    14. Re:How is he surviving? by hoowee · · Score: 1
      From this page: http://www.parksabers.com/aboutus_info.html

      Profession: Professional Lightsaber Manufacturer for 7 years
      and
      Goal: To be the best Lightsaber Designer in the world.

      I imagine it wouldn't be hard to fix up those little bits and make the site copyright compliant. Now if only he could make one that expands and retracts at the touch of a button (and makes cool humming noises)... ah well.. I suppose we'll have to wait a couple more years for that. :)

      --

      Comic Book Guy: "There is no Groening in my store."
    15. Re:How is he surviving? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      heck, I registered artoo-detoo.com and see-threepio.com and they didn't sue me

      --
      This space available.
    16. Re:How is he surviving? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Bogus? How could they be bogus when they're on TV! It has to be real to be on TV, right? Just like the UFOs and aliens and elchupacabras and stuff. By the way, wrestling is a real sport, isn't it?

      --
      How ya like dat?
    17. Re:How is he surviving? by unitron · · Score: 2
      "...wasn't it was star wars that started the whole laser sword thing?"

      Isaac Asimov, writing as Paul French in the late '50s and/or early '60s, in the "Lucky" Starr books, had various cutting weapons featuring "force-field"-type blades. In other words, they were just hilts or handles until you press the "activate blade" button. Sort of electronic switchblades, but some of them had sword-length blades.

      Shouldn't the lightsaber thing have been one story, and the "StarWars = Civil War" thing been a separate story?

      Wouldn't the lightsaber maker article have been a lot better with more information about what he uses for blades, and more/better pictures of same?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    18. Re:How is he surviving? by bubkus_jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      If he made movie replicas, yes. But he doesn't, he makes his own designs, and was one of the first to use the Electro-Luminecent acryllic-something blades (nearly indestructible blades that kind of look like a Timex Indiglo but in various colours)

    19. Re:How is he surviving? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      actually all of his ideas are borrowed... thats what makes it so great... just look at all the similarities between SW and typical myth... tis goes on and on + there is the whole anti-nazi sentiment and whatnot along with some other more contemporary underlying hatred sewn into SW to make it hit home just like we want it to... Lucas did a great job of binding every part of typical story he could intpo one movie... hes a genious

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  2. Geocities... by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    Dear Lord, did Slashdot really link a Geocities site?

    1. Re:Geocities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to imply that the quality of writing and the quality of witty banter on Slashdot is somehow higher than on a Geocities site.

    2. Re:Geocities... by Xthlc · · Score: 1

      It would appear so.

      I can understand Geocities' squelching of their freeloaders in an attempt to make money, however nobody can link to Geocities site anymore without it going offline. That's just stupid. Geocities used to have a really high public profile due to the number of cool or weird sites that would pop up on it; now, I can't even remember the last time I saw a Geocities site.

      Time for /. to implement a formal no-linking policy for Geocities. Stop giving them free ad impressions!

    3. Re:Geocities... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but at least the pipe is bigger. Five comments and the bandwith limit has been exceeded. Oh well. We probably didn't miss much.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:Geocities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think he was commenting on the extreme bandwidth restrictions of geocities which mean that the linked site probably lasted approximately 5ms before being cut off..

    5. Re:Geocities... by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

      It ain't the quality of pages served, it's the quantity.

    6. Re:Geocities... by allism · · Score: 1

      Geocities has done a good enough job of killing the number of ad impressions a site can generate by limiting the amount of bandwidth a site can use up. No need for help from Slashdot.

    7. Re:Geocities... by tregoweth · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. Look closely at the story -- the Geocities sites are the article submitter's. And they're not even in Google's cache. Poorly planned, that...

  3. feh by Highlordexecutioner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah they are cool looking and all, but if they dont make the sound whats the point.

    --
    Where am I going and why am I in this handbasket?
    1. Re:feh by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah they are cool looking and all, but if they dont make the sound whats the point.


      The replicas' silent operation gives you the opportunity to make the appropriate sounds yourself.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:feh by Misagon · · Score: 1

      I have some early plans to construct some electronics which should create good sounds.
      The key components would be an Analog Devices ADXL 202 accelerometer, a PIC microcontroller and (of course) a speaker.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  4. ep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This goes out to all the ACs worldwide.

  5. Shooting High by donnacha · · Score: 4, Funny

    "My goal is to be the best light saber designer in the world," he said.
    Wow, lofty ambition what with all the competition out there.
    1. Re:Shooting High by yasth · · Score: 1

      Since he lost a contract to someone, there does seem to be competition. And I remember there being a Light saber in some popular electronics magazine (it used a neon tube, so I would be a bit worried about it).

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    2. Re:Shooting High by donnacha · · Score: 2

      And I remember there being a Light saber in some popular electronics magazine (it used a neon tube, so I would be a bit worried about it).
      Wow, really? That's pretty dangerous!

      Mind you, the capacity to actually kill someone with your light saber would probably be considered an advanced feature by a lot of people.

    3. Re:Shooting High by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Wow, lofty ambition what with all the competition out there.

      There are a number of companies competing with him. Some are selling to the world via the web, others sell at conventions only and thus to a smaller audience.

      Some of them make one lightsaber a month, not one hundred like Jeff, and thus can devote an awful lot of work into making them be of top quality.

      So yes, that's a lofty ambition.

      You're talking about a market that is large enough that it made this guy a millionaire; doesn't that clue you in?

      He has to have sold tens of thousands of these in order to have made a million bucks of profit, and he's just one guy in the market.

      Go to any big SF convention and check out the dealer room. You'll see a couple of vendors, and they'll probably be small regional vendors in just your area. Plus many SW fans who participate in weird convention costume behavior make their own, and some of those people do quite excellent work.

      And on top of that, he's competing with the folks who make the officially-licensed ones, which are GORGEOUS.

      It is indeed a lofty ambition, because the competition is one of quality, not quantity.

  6. NEWS FLASH! by ziggles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Supply and Demand continues to be an economic principle!

  7. Unless I can kill people with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want it.

    Besides, I know this guy in Chicago who's going to hook me up with some force powers! Awesome!

  8. From the article by mericet · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Parks is not affiliated with LucasFilms, Ltd., the maker of the Star Wars movies, but he has sought a relationship. Six months ago, he lost a contract bid to be the official licensed manufacturer of Star Wars light sabers to Master Replicas."

  9. Strong in the Force... by LordYUK · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but not strong enough to withstand a slashdotting!

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  10. I know this one guy.... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    He makes the most kickass lightsabers out of plumbing stuff from the hardware store. I remember one of them used a shower head...

    As far as I know he doesn't go out looking to sell them but when he had a few and he was showing them off someone went up to him and bought one anyway..

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    1. Re:I know this one guy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [sa]It was Euro, wasn't it?[/sa]

  11. How to recognize fellow slashdotters... by razablade · · Score: 1

    running around the streets with their new lightsabers.

    --
    The expression is "I could NOT care less." Think about it.
  12. absurdist prequel theories by jaeson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ahhhh the slashdot effect. Crushing absurdist prequel theories' web sites in seconds.

    1. Re:absurdist prequel theories by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      THe amusing thing is that none of the prequal theories will be close. The people coming up with these theories have put way more thought into it than Lucas is. It's hard to read when your eyes are shaped like dollar signs. ($_$)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  13. duh.. by swoopx · · Score: 5, Funny

    *waves hand*
    "This isn't the company you're looking to sue"
    "move along lucas"

    1. Re:duh.. by thunderbee · · Score: 1

      > "This isn't the company you're looking to sue"
      > "move along lucas
      Stupid Jedi mind tricks don't work on me. Only money works on me.

      --
      In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
    2. Re:duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was VERY NOT FUNNY.

      EVERYONE else has thought of that joke before.

      That joke is only made 5 times per second here on Slashdot.

      GO AWAY YOU AREN'T FUNNY.

    3. Re:duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I HATE YOU I HATE YOU

      You fucking Star Wars dorks have the worst sense of humor ever.

      Can't you EVER stop making that joke? When does it stop being funny to you? The six or seventh million time you have heard it? I am just wondering, really.

    4. Re:duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You too have the gay. You are a big Star Wars faggot and aren't funny. Go away Star Wars fag you aren't funny and you can go back to humping the floor and blowing your dog after beating off to the goatse.cx guy.

      YOU ARE THE MOST UNFUNNY PERSON EVER.

    5. Re:duh.. by kiahale · · Score: 1

      *waves hand*
      These aren't the fucking Star Wars dorks you're looking for.
      Move along.

    6. Re:duh.. by Shotgun+Jenny · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Warning! Warning! Uber-Dr0k sighted!

    7. Re:duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a hint for the next time you try to be funny:

      If someone says something isn't funny, repeating the thing doesn't make it any funnier.

    8. Re:duh.. by rifter · · Score: 1

      If someone says something isn't funny, repeating the thing doesn't make it any funnier.

      Obviously not a fan of David Letterman, or Sergio Aragone. In fact it seems that repeating something that is not in itself funny seems to be taken as funny eventually. Cases in point are the milage the former gets from stuff like "These pretzels are making me thirsty" and the latters' references to mulching and cheese dip.

    9. Re:duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would disagree with you there. I laughed harder at the second one than the first one.

      I also think Cowboy Neal in polls are usually funny. They weren't funny to me at first but it has become funny over the years.

  14. Slashdot effect by s1r_m1xalot · · Score: 5, Funny

    .
    I felt a disturbance in the force as if all of parksabers.com's 56 kilobits of uplink all screamed at once and then died out.

  15. indestructible by !splut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've come across his site before, and left drooling slightly. Those are freggin nice suckers, and I must say that I'm extremely impressed with his abilities.

    I would even the steep price tag more or less justifiable, considering the impress-your-friends factor. People spend more on PDAs. But... well, what good is a replica light saber if you can't saber duel with yer buddies? The specs mention that the plasma lamp is encased in a virtually indestructible polycarbonate (actually, it reads "polycarbonite," which is either a typo or a clever pun) housing.

    Well, polycarbonate is the same stuff they use to make high quality scratch resistant "virtually indestructible" eyeglass lenses. Quite a few of which I have personally destructed. So, I wonder how well the "blades" stand up to thwackin'.

    -ks

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
    1. Re:indestructible by donnacha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I would even the steep price tag more or less justifiable, considering the impress-your-friends factor.
      You have friends?
    2. Re:indestructible by real_b0fh · · Score: 0

      for that price, id better have a very nice Katana replica. Much more cool than a stupid lightsaber, and I can *actually* kill someone with it. Impresses the chicks too (have some here ;-)

      --
      "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It just happens to be selective on who it makes friendship with"
    3. Re:indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, polycarbonate is the same stuff they use to make high quality scratch resistant "virtually indestructible" eyeglass lenses. Quite a few of which I have personally destructed. So, I wonder how well the "blades" stand up to thwackin'.

      I don't know what you want from a pair of glasses. Lenscrafter tells you up front that they are not indestructible, simply scratch resistant. According to polycarb.org "polycarbonate lenses will have a special scratch coating on both front and back". In fact "every pair of eyeglasses dispensed should be accompanied by a printed Eyeglass Safety Warning".
      So while it would be cool to do some thwackin', unless you plan on making them out of steel, your blades are going to crack. And then you're down the money you could have paid for a new PDA.

    4. Re:indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have friends?

      I take it back, you ARE a troll.

      -Geek In Training

    5. Re:indestructible by donnacha · · Score: 0, Troll

      I take it back, you ARE a troll.
      LOL.

      Oh, c'mon, how could anyone resist should an obvious opportunity?

    6. Re:indestructible by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It was just so obvious, and has been done SO many times in the 4 years that I've been here, it's just old.

      Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    7. Re:indestructible by donnacha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It was just so obvious, and has been done SO many times in the 4 years that I've been here, it's just old.

      Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

      Sure, fair point, but a lot of people aren't such /. veterans and, while that particular joke is, admittedly, obvious even to newbies, I reckon that a smattering of well-meaning jibes adds a certain flow to the discussion. More than anything, it's a way to encourage the poster, letting him know that his contribution is generating some sort of response.

      Hell, it's the weekend, there's hardly anyone on here, but us sad nerds can still have fun.

    8. Re:indestructible by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Katana replica. Much more cool than a stupid lightsaber, and I can *actually* kill someone with it. Impresses the chicks too

      Would those happen to be the same "chicks" who get engaged to men in prison? ...or the ones who show up in the ER with broken bones because they "tripped"?

      As far as being able to *actually* kill someone, I'll take my car against your Katana any day.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:indestructible by Genjuro+Kibagami · · Score: 1
      Would those happen to be the same "chicks" who get engaged to men in prison? ...or the ones who show up in the ER with broken bones because they "tripped"?

      Are you implying that people with swords are violent by nature? The martial arts disciplines, especially the ones which use katanas are typically not the sort which welcome the type of people you're implying that the original poster may be. I certainly would never strike someone with any of my blades except in self defense.

      As far as being able to *actually* kill someone, I'll take my car against your Katana any day.

      All in the environment, in a typical environment, i.e. not a large flat field with no obstacles. You would be toast vs a competent katana wielder, car or no.;)

    10. Re:indestructible by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      I take exception to your implication that owning a Katana automatically makes me a prison bound wife beater. I think I'll hunt you down and stab you to death after I finish smacking my girlfriend around...

      >:)
      Kintanon
      Disclaimer: I do not yet own a Katana, I will be making that purchase in a couple of months.

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    11. Re:indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Disclaimer: I do not yet own a Katana, I will be making that purchase in a couple of months.

      Addendum: I also do not yet own a girlfriend, I will be making that purchase in a couple of months.
    12. Re:indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ... someone who is consipicuously proud of how lethal his sword is and how much it impresses the chicks (and is serious :) is more likely to be violent by nature.

    13. Re:indestructible by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      And..
      if it has a glass plasma tube in the middle, you can still smash it up but good even if the outer polycarbonate casing is intact.

    14. Re:indestructible by antirename · · Score: 1

      I prefer a .45 auto. It's smaller, easier to conceal, and I don't have to get within six feet to take your head off. Of course, I could get a replica that would look the same and make the same noise, but that would be missing the point.

    15. Re:indestructible by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Are you implying that people with swords are violent by nature?

      Nope :)

      Look at what I quoted - I was responding to someone who values his Katana replica because "I can *actually* kill someone with it. Impresses the chicks". In particular I was highlighting an apparent connection between the two sentences.

      The martial arts disciplines, especially the ones which use katanas are typically not the sort which welcome the type of people you're implying that the original poster may be.

      Right. If I may rearrange your words:
      I was implying the original poster may be type of person the martial arts disciplines, especially the ones which use katanas, typically do not welcome.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    16. Re:indestructible by druzicka · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I am a major Star Wars geek, and even though I'm now 27 years old, I like to purchase Star Wars Toys.

      I don't know if I agree with this statement:

      what good is a replica light saber if you can't saber duel with yer buddies?

      When Episode I came out, My friends and I purchased the Hasbro Quia-Gon Ginn lightsaber that lights up and makes noises. After about 15 minutes of playing with them, we didn't ever engage in "duels" with them again. No one got hurt, but I think that since none of us had ever taken Kendo (or any other swordfighting lessons) ever before, we felt like a bunch of homos slapping each other with sticks. So if I ever purchase another light saber, I'm going to get one of the collector's pieces that doesn't have some totally fake looking blade attached. Instead, I'll put it in a display case.

      --
      If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
    17. Re:indestructible by gvonk · · Score: 3, Funny



      I think I'll hunt you down and stab you to death after I finish smacking my girlfriend around...
      ...
      Disclaimer: I do not yet own a Katana, I will be making that purchase in a couple of months.


      Ahhhh, Slashdot... Where you have to disclaim the fact that you don't yet own a three-foot-long sword and that you will soon, but you need not disclaim the fact that you actually don't beat up your girlfriend.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    18. Re:indestructible by SirKodiak · · Score: 1
      I would even the steep price tag more or less justifiable, considering the impress-your-friends factor. People spend more on PDAs. But... well, what good is a replica light saber if you can't saber duel with yer buddies?
      I wouldn't want to duel with anything that looked remotely liked a light saber. If the casing were hard at all then you'd be leaving yourself open to some non-trivial injuries. A sword swing can involve enough force that getting hit in the head with something as safe-looking as a padded practice sword can still be painful and cause significant bumps and bruises (speaking as someone who once had that happen).
      The specs mention that the plasma lamp is encased in a virtually indestructible polycarbonate (actually, it reads "polycarbonite," which is either a typo or a clever pun) housing. Well, polycarbonate is the same stuff they use to make high quality scratch resistant "virtually indestructible" eyeglass lenses. Quite a few of which I have personally destructed. So, I wonder how well the "blades" stand up to thwackin'.
      I think the idea is that you don't have to worry about it getting easily scratched or shattering if you want to let someone play with it. They don't look like they are intended for simulating combat.
    19. Re:indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "should have paid"?

    20. Re:indestructible by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      oh they are QUITE strong, in several behind the scenes clips from Starwars.com, you can see the Anakin/Dooku duel (the closeup scenes with the glow bouncing off the characters faces) where they use blades very similar. I also know many people who own Park's products and they dues with them quite regularily (some fo them go all out on them)

    21. Re:indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think he actually has a girlfriend? Didn't you just say something about the nature of Slashdot? Silly you.

    22. Re:indestructible by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      What kind of homo do you feel like now?

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    23. Re:indestructible by Mashiara · · Score: 1

      The parksabers use EL sheets for light, so there's no plasma tube to be shattered, EL sheets themselves are very flexible so I would doubt any force that would not break the polycarbonate casing could damage the sheet in any significatinf fashion.

    24. Re:indestructible by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      I would even the steep price tag more or less justifiable, considering the impress-your-friends factor. People spend more on PDAs. But... well, what good is a replica light saber if you can't saber duel with yer buddies? The specs mention that the plasma lamp is encased in a virtually indestructible polycarbonate (actually, it reads "polycarbonite," which is either a typo or a clever pun) housing.

      It's the same stuff CDs are made of, and those are hard enough to break (try some time). I think it would survive dueling (I'd worry more about the mounting point than the blade itself).

      These aren't plasma tubes (that was a different light sabre manufacturer, who used glass tube blades and was featured here a year or two ago). The light sabres on this site use an electroluminescent coating on the inside of the tube like the kind in the "indiglo" watches (probably exactly the same kind, as the authour uses the word "indiglo" when describing it).

      So there are no high voltages and no vacuum chambers involved in making your light sabre look pretty :).

      I'd phone the seller and ask if these can stand up to dueling before trying it with a $370 sword, though.

    25. Re:indestructible by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      I was going for a play on the Owning a Katana = Wife beating inmate, by saying Girlfriend, and threatening to commit a violent crime, while planning to purchase a Katana. So that by the time I DO own a Katana, I would be married, and in jail.>:) It didn't quite work as well as I was hoping it would.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    26. Re:indestructible by furchin · · Score: 1

      Because there is a significant non-zero probability that a slashdotter owns a katana, while the odds of actually having a girlfriend are significantly lower.

  16. British lightsabers by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An interesting note on lightsabers; They are actually flash handles from 1940s press cameras. What bearing that has on copywrites, I'm not sure, but I think it'd be hard to licence a garage sale part for your movie, personally. Maybe this guy's calling them "lite sabers". Of course, you see dozens of toy replicas made in Mexico in any toy store... "Galactic Laser Swords inc." If you can get away with that level of duplication, then it can't be too hard for this guy. More power to him. Now he just needs to make a working one ^__^ "Batteries not included"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:British lightsabers by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1

      The original lightsaber handles (Luke Skywalker's first, Darth Vader's, and Obi-Wan Kenobi's) were indeed converted graflex flash unites. However, starting with Luke Skywalker's second saber (in ROTJ), they've been machined/cast sabers. It's a quicker and more cost-effective way to make them en masse.

      --
      I am not Herbert.
    2. Re:British lightsabers by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Luke and Vaders were Graflex... Obi's was actually made up of parts from several differnt things... including a hand gear from a british tap.

      However, Vader's saber in ESB or RotJ was actually based on a differnt flash handle.

      Yoda's saber was made from a Flash handle as well.

    3. Re:British lightsabers by Vess+V. · · Score: 1

      I believe Vader's was a Heiland.

  17. la de da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Originally Published on Texas Indecision on May 20, 2002
    Posted on the Dedman Site on May 20, 2002
    Is George Lucas Johnny Reb?
    The Star Wars Trilogy & The American Civil War
    Written by David Rogers
    Texas Politico and Hopwood Plaintiff

    I was inspired to think some more about Episode 2: Attack of the Clones by "The Case for the Empire," which makes the case that the Empire, not the Rebels, are really the good guys in the Star Wars saga.

    While not making any judgment on that premise, after a second viewing (yes I am a TOTAL geek -- I saw AOTC TWICE on its opening weekend), I have decided that I was wrong in claiming that that the Republic is the Weimar Republic (though the bit about the Chancellor assuming dictatorial powers was a strong hint).

    Instead, I believe that the Republic is the American Republic, circa 1860.

    Emperor Palpatine is Abraham Lincoln. The Secessionist Rebels are.. well, secessionist rebels.

    Tattered but Never Taken - 20th Alabama Battle Flag
    Shocking, isn't it?

    It's a world where Senators and Representatives grant "emergency power" to the executive branch, which the executive branch promises to return to the Senators and Representatives as soon as the current crisis is over. (But, of course, the executive never does return that power.)

    And the executive, with his newly granted emergency powers, creates a "Grand Army of the Republic" -- precisely the same title Lincoln gave his army.

    It is a world in which the new executive pushes aside the old because he has been "ineffective in dealing with the secessionist crisis" -- precisely the same complaint Lincoln made about his predecessor, Buchanan.

    The Jedi, like the American graduates of West Point, are split. Some push the rebellion and secession (whose members suggest that their secession might be construed as treason), and others push the Republican Union.

    Anakin Skywalker engages in a brutal massacre of Tuskan Raiders and Jawas ("Sand People" who nomadic lives and teepee-like dwellings suggest American Indians, particularly of the Southwest), whom he describes, in language reminiscent of George Armstrong Custer, as "animals." And like Custer, Anakin slaughters not only the men, but also the women and children.

    But is Anakin Custer? Or is he Grant to Palpatine's Lincoln -- the utterly ruthless right-hand man whose brutality makes him essential to any attempt to put down the rebellion? And does that make his mentor, Obi-Wan, who we know will oppose Palpatine and Anakin -- Robert E. Lee?

    And is it any accident that the Clone Wars are precipitated at the beginning by trade disputes like those that tore apart the industrial North and the serene, agricultural (Naboo-like) South? Is Senator Amidala really Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, who protests the depredations of the Trade Federation only to be ignored by the Senate, and whose daughter is the ultimate leader of the Rebellion?

    If so, and if we are meant to take seriously Lucas' portrayal of the rebels as the good guys, and the Imperialist Republic as the bad guys -- does that make George Lucas Johnny Reb?

    And what is the "dark side" of The Force? Is it the desire for centralization and mechanization -- the "force" that turns Skywalker into Vader, and turns the peaceful Republic into the violent Empire?

    And is it coincidence that Count Dooku -- the man who gave Jengo Fett his orders -- is known also as "Tyrannus" -- the same name Booth gave to Lincoln after he fatally shot the president, by shouting form the stage of the Ford theater "Sic Semper Tyrannus?"

    Oh, and then there is the issue of slavery. The Jedi representatives of the Republic seemingly have no interest in ending it -- but it is the catalyst that drives Anakin Skywalker -- and ultimately, it will be he whose anger (over his mother's slavery, among other things) propels the Republic -- the Empire -- to victory over the secessionist rebels at the close of the Clone Wars.

    By the time of Episode 4 slavery is (mostly) gone. The Republic, which is seemingly responsible for this change of events, has been swept aside by the corrupt Empire.

    Is Lucas saying that that good was incidental as the primary actors -- Palpatine and his cronies -- acted only for selfish aggrandizement and greed for power and in the interests of commercial disputes?

    And is the evil battled against in Episodes 4-6 the evil of a Leviathan (modern) state?

    Is Vader evil? Is Palpatine? Or are they merely corrupted by absolute power?

    Is Luke Skywalker, the man from the desert, descended from the avatars of Lincoln and Grant, Ronald Reagan, from the desert of Los Angeles? Is Luke's struggle against a too-large, unresponsive government with oppressive taxation Reagan's struggle?

    And what does this mean?
    Yoda ---> Dooku / Tyrannus
    Dooku ---> Qui-Gon Jinn
    Qui-Gon ---> Obi-Wan
    Obi-Wan ---> Anakin/ Darth
    Obi-Wan ---> Luke
    Yoda ---> Luke

    Is Yoda Jefferson? Is Obi-Wan Robert E. Lee? Are they teaching a lesson of state's rights which is ignored by their immediate successors, but is embraced by Luke Reagan?

    And, if Palpatine is both Lincoln and the embodiment of the Dark Side, and NOT a Jedi, but someone who decisively rejects the Jedi/Jefferson tradition and who teaches something entirely new and mechanical in place of the spiritualism of the Yoda/Jefferson Force -- then what is Lucas saying about Lincoln?

    Was that noise Yoda made really the rebel yell?

    1. Re:la de da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converted links:
      Texas Indecision http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasindecision/
      Dedman Site http://www.geocities.com/jdedman4/
      David Rogers mailto:darogers@aol.com
      "The Case for the Empire," http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Artic les/000/000/001/248ipzbt.asp

  18. Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by donnacha · · Score: 5, Funny


    Well, at least they acknowledge where in their customers' psyches the deep-rooted need to own one of these things stems by naming one of their top models Malestrom as opposed to Maelstrom. I wonder if any of their customers notice this subtle dig?

    More worringly, I wonder what a Femalestrom would look like?

    1. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Funny

      More worringly, I wonder what a Femalestrom would look like?

      Probably just like a malestrom, but without the blade.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by jcsehak · · Score: 4, Funny

      More worringly, I wonder what a Femalestrom would look like?

      It's the one that needs batteries.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    3. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grow up

    4. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lighten up

    5. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1


      I suppose it depends on how much of a fee
      you are willing to pay.

    6. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or a flower or budding blossom...

    7. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by Spy4MS · · Score: 1

      More worringly, I wonder what a Femalestrom would look like?

      Same as male senator Thurmond, but with breasts sized 38-long.

    8. Re:Malestrom, Apt Naming in Action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While male senator Thurmond is what, 36-long?

  19. Re:Unless I can kill people with it... -- You Can! by Tony · · Score: 1

    Just beat the bejeezus out of them. That sucker's made from an aircraft-grade aluminum pipe.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  20. ~chuckle~ by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Funny

    (!) "This isn't the company we're looking to sue..."
    "Let's move along and make another sequel."

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:~chuckle~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You suck too. Go away and stop being such a big fag.

    2. Re:~chuckle~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, my good chap. This fag should go away; or we should push him out a window failing that.
      Ta-ta, fellow troll and good day.

  21. Curses! Foiled again! by TechFaerie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dang it! Someone has beat me to the lucrative market of making completely inconsequential items for insane amounts of money! Curses! My plans for world domination.....crushed....

    ...now to take over the world by selling fast food, containing a minute dose of alkaloid...completely harmless, but absolutely addictive!

    *Sigh* So much evil, so little time

    --
    "To make apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." -Carl Sagan
  22. How did he do that?! by Eddy+Johnson · · Score: 4, Funny

    The sabers need special materials for them. The Obi-Wan saber needed a rare British grenade, a shower head, and a few other materials. All the other ones (from the original movies, at least) need camera attachments for flashbulbs, with wiper blades and little electronic bits attached, for the most part. The camera attachments are reasonably expensive now, and are moderately rare.

    So how did this guy find all the rare goodies to make all these things to become a millionaire off of them? He must have been awfully rich to begin with.

    --


    Anonymous Coward: (n.) 1. nerd at school or library. 2. karmawhore in training. 3. embarrased prep.
    1. Re:How did he do that?! by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised what you can make with a little bit of time and some ingenuity. While you may not make an ANH-era Obi-Wan saber exactly without rare grenades, with access to high-quality photos of the original, you can quickly reproduce it by silicon casting or even old-fashioned carving. But you'd be surprised at what can be done by a machinist who knows what he's doing.

      Besides, the article states that he's machining his own handles -- it's not Obi-Wan sabers, it's kind of a fan-fiction EU type thing. Although I do think he made one that looked like Obi-Wan's TPM/AOTC saber.

      The only thing really expensive is just the equipment to make this stuff -- and at the prices he charges, he paid that off in short order.

      --
      I am not Herbert.
    2. Re:How did he do that?! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Remember how much time he's putting into these things. It's not like he's not doing anything for the money.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    3. Re:How did he do that?! by therealmoose · · Score: 0

      Well, if you read the article you will find out that he machines these from solid pieces of metal, not assembles them like the SW props people do/did. Also, he designs his own instead of replicating the ones that appear in SW.

    4. Re:How did he do that?! by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Says he's made over a million bucks, which is plenty to live on if you budget it properly.

    5. Re:How did he do that?! by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

      read the article... he does it in his machine shop with custom made metal parts... and he doesnt have complete replicas of the ones in the movie, they're more of his own design.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    6. Re:How did he do that?! by jred · · Score: 2

      Actually, the company *grossed* over a million. Much of that will go to raw materials and equipment. Oh, and don't forget taxes...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  23. Re:I know this one girl, in bandcamp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...made a lightsaber out of a flute. It was amazing what she could do with it.

  24. Need a job? by Paladin814 · · Score: 1

    In the article he states that he needed to hire help because of his 400 orders after EPII. Considering the site is slashdotted now, I am sure he will be selling way more then 400 this month. Perfect time to get into the black-smith business, not to be confused with the dark side...

    1. Re:Need a job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black smith business? Machining is NOT black smithing. One involves a bunch of coal, a hammer and an anvil, the other a bunch of big power tools. The only common ground is that they both work with metal, albeit different kinds (you won't find a black smith working aluminum, for instance).

  25. For those who weren't sure... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 5, Funny

    The 33-year-old resident of Forney, 20 miles east of Dallas, makes custom light sabers,

    Huh?

    weapons used by Jedi knights in the Star
    Wars films.


    Ohhhh...

    Also, on Parks' website, you can get a utility belt! I thought it was funny that it lists it as The DefianceTM Belt, Adjustable to fit sizes 32-40. I think he's grossly underestimated his clientelle...

    --
    "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    1. Re:For those who weren't sure... by johnathan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Also, on Parks' website, you can get a utility belt! I thought it was funny that it lists it as The DefianceTM Belt, Adjustable to fit sizes 32-40. I think he's grossly underestimated his clientelle...
      <comicbookguy>
      I do not have a receipt -- I won it as a door prize at the Star Trek convention, although I find their choice of prize highly illogical as the average Trekker has no use for a medium-sized belt.
      </comicbookguy>
      --
      You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
    2. Re:For those who weren't sure... by npsimons · · Score: 1
      I thought it was funny that it lists it as The DefianceTM Belt, Adjustable to fit sizes 32-40. I think he's grossly underestimated his clientelle...


      No, no, no! You've got the stereotype all wrong! Don't you know that geekdom is made up only of very fat and very skinny people who have acne and no tan? If anything, he should be marketing the belt in two models: one in 24-32, and another in 42-96.

  26. And now he'll be even richer.. by doublem · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mmmm. Star Wars Products that don't line the pockets of George Lucas. Mmmmm

    And now his sales will tipple. Anyone else remember what happened after thinkgeek.com was slashdotted? I wonder when we'll have the parksabers.com box as an option. What will the icon be when he comes out with a new model???

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  27. Jedi are nothing compared to the power of the /. by cyberlotnet · · Score: 3, Funny

    More powerfull then a any hacker
    Faster then a speeding DoS Attack
    Able to quelch tall servers with a single post
    Its a bird its a plane no its /.

  28. fast cash? by hey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One million in eight years is $125K a year which isn't bad but he has two employees (dad and fiancee). Instead he sounds like a hardworking guy.

    1. Re:fast cash? by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Informative

      Plus, it says he has grossed a million, which means that doesn't include materials, tools, and shipping. And he's still working out of his garage.

      I'd be surprised if he makes for than $40,000 US a year.

      (Before taxes. AIEEE!)

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    2. Re:fast cash? by Manitcor · · Score: 2

      Gotta admit though, not bad for doing something you enjoy, and with all this publicity he may just make a little more this year.

      I think I might just buy one, I wonder how long the light lasts.

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    3. Re:fast cash? by The+Raven · · Score: 2

      Well, he is currently selling at a rate of about 100 per month... 400 around movies. I averaged that out to 150 per month over the last year, and that's nearly half a million gross. That's respectable, even after you take out parts and labor.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    4. Re:fast cash? by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Well...it's supposed to be EL (like an indiglo watch) which means that as long as it does not overheat, it should last nearly forever. It just depends on how well designed it is, it should last at least 10 years.

  29. why does it glow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody have technical details of this "glowing metal" concept?

    1. Re:why does it glow? by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      The "glowing metal" is a luminescent film that glows when electricity is applied. This is an option on some of the new Mercedes, it has that film in the doorjam and it glows "MERCEDES" when the door is open.

  30. UserFriendly by fidget42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That sight made User Fiendly's Link of the Day last week. Was Slashdot scooped by a comic strip? ;)

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
    1. Re:UserFriendly by fidget42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, June 11 was the Link of the Day and the 16th was the Link of the Week (best LotD that week)

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
  31. I felt a great disturbance in the Force... by Salsaman · · Score: 2

    as if a million webservers cried out and were silenced...

    1. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the rest of the geocities accounts right?

  32. I've got a light saber by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, Beavis huh huh huh huh, I've got a light saber, huh huh huh huh, In my Pants. No way, butthead! Can I see it? I bet you want to, you wussy! huh huh huh huh! Shut up, fartknocker! heh heh heh heh.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  33. Re:Curses! Foiled again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...now to take over the world by selling fast food, containing a minute dose of alkaloid
    Fowler Schocken Associates hold the patent on this technology, used in our brand-leader product Coffiest®. Prepare to be sued.
  34. Previous discussions... by nastro · · Score: 1

    If I recall, there's a guy here who owns one, also, discussions with the proprietors over strength,(you will spar, won't you?) and oh so many other details. http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenTopic/page?q=Y& a=tpc&s=50009562&f=34709834&m=5760901974&p=1

  35. Working Blades?! by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Just beat the bejeezus out of them. That sucker's made from an aircraft-grade aluminum pipe.

    You must have missed this detail

    "I had purchased a saber from a company that is now out of business," said 29-year-old Anthony Minichino of Brick, N.J. "Parks came along and had complete original designs. Some of them had working blades, which I'd never seen before."

    Which is something to give me pause...

    Working?

    Just what we need for our special forces in Afghanistan.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Working Blades?! by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      FWIW, it's typically regarded as better to shoot the bad guys from a distance instead of let them get close. Just a thought. :)

  36. They're nice but... by antdude · · Score: 2

    The blade part doesn't look right (too thin). I wonder if he could fix that.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. I have one of these by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    I'm sometimes shy to admit it, but I bought one of these things waaaaay back when he first started making them, and he only had 4 designs to offer. That was back before they were battery-powered. I bought one of them for my brother for his 28th birthday, and later I decided I couldn't stand not having one, and bought the Defiant light saber (the cheapest they had .. in case I didn't think it was cool after I bought it.)

    I still think it's way cool, even though the Ep1 and Ep2 movies weren't all that great. At least I have my own light saber! :)

  38. master replica by Patrick13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the master replica website in case you want to actually see the official replica saber, complete with a quicktime movie demo of one in action.... at least it satisfied my curiosity while the park sabers site is being slashdotted.

    --
    ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. so umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... these actually work like real lightsabres then?

  41. Making REAL light sabers by Proc6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I realize the light saber of Star Wars is impossible for what we know now, but does anyone have anything to say or any URL's about possible light saber like weapons that actually work? What would it take? Come on geeks, if you can mod a case enough to make a dual athlon not overheat in 3 seconds, surely you can figure out a way to make a big thick laser beam capable of cutting through a car.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:Making REAL light sabers by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      The damn thing would take a LOT of energy to run.

      They cut though, what looked like, at least 2 feet of dense metal.

      So, the actual saber is probably as thick as a human hair. Incredibly efficient so it doesn't heat up the air around it and fry the user. Doesn't emit "Bad" radiation of any type.

      I'm still not sure how you can always get it to cut though things without turning stuff into gas. You certainly wouldn't want to cut though metal walls when you're getting 2000 degree metal gas being blown back into your face.

      Anyway, it's not possible. At the very least, the cable from the device to your portable nuclear reactor would be unwieldy.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Making REAL light sabers by irvmx · · Score: 1
      Proc6 wrote:

      #Come on geeks, if you can mod a case enough to
      #make a dual athlon not overheat in 3 seconds,
      #surely you can figure out a way to make a big
      #thick laser beam capable of cutting through a
      #car.

      They've already got 'em. It's the batteries that are the problem.

      May the forklift be with you.
      Irv

    3. Re:Making REAL light sabers by zephc · · Score: 2

      think plasma welder

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:Making REAL light sabers by ted_nugent · · Score: 1
      Anyway, it's not possible. At the very least, the cable from the device to your portable nuclear reactor would be unwieldy.

      This restriction might be overcome by using Electricity over IP combined with 802.11x.

      --

      Free the West Memphis Three!

    5. Re:Making REAL light sabers by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The best theory I've heard yet on how you would make a lightsaber-like weapon is that you would have some kind of containment bottle containing a highly compressed plasma, which would be squirted out the top and held by some kind of magnetic bottle. Possibly the power needed to maintain the 'bottle' would be supplied by the release of the plasma. This theory can be used to explain away two aspects of lightsabers and lightsaber-like weapons:

      1. The sound that they make when they pass through the air. Plasma discharge.
      2. The fact that they will block each other when they collide. Like forces repel; two bottles with the same polarity will push each other away. If it were some kind of alternating field, well, I dunno. I don't have the physics for it.

      Another possible hack would be a focused laser. This seems more like what the lucas lightsaber does; remember it's based on a laser and has some kind of crystal which is (ostensibly) pumped by a normal laser. There's also a beam splitter. It is possible that you could aim and tune several lasers in such a way that they would seem to terminate at a fixed point.

      As for the "point" a poster makes about not being able to see a laser unless there is dust in the air; This is not true. High-powered enough lasers actually cause reactions in the gas molecules which comprise air to throw off visible light, and god knows what else. Thus an EXTREMELY high-powered laser could quite conceivably be visible.

      The plasma-type sabers are most common in Anime; They actually curve when swung fast enough, and seem to sputter and elongate, indicating that the bottle has an open end, but the plasma normally expires as it reaches the end of the bottle. Swinging it quickly causes the plasma to be slung from the bottle, but ostensibly at the cost of concentration.

      Now, aren't you sorry you asked?

      Incidentally, the reason we don't have them now is primarily because of a lack of power sources which are dense enough. You can't get enough power for that kind of reaction into any battery a human can carry. You might be able to pull something off with chemical lasers, which are probably responsible for the death of the gyrojet project; As many of you know the gyrojet pistol was invented some time ago at JPL, and produced a working weapon, but it's really no good except as a low-recoil weapon for space use. Lasers are great in space because of the lack of air to absorb the energy, and chemical lasers can put out pretty intense amounts of energy. That's just my paranoid guess, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Making REAL light sabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'd know to look out for people with light sabers when birds start dropping dead from the sky due to all the ambient radiation being kicked around?

    7. Re:Making REAL light sabers by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Perhaps the Star Wars light sabers are a variation of Niven's variable sword (monofilament wire held rigid by a stasis field.) Obviously, the stasis field is not quite perfect, and "smears" out a bit to form the blade of the saber. The burning plasma effect might be caused by random air molecules caught in the fringes of the field; or maybe a current is run along the monofilament, causing it to glow, and the plasma effect is the result of the energy leakage from the less-than-perfect stasis field.

      (Yes, I realize that this is completely useless speculation about a fictional weapon. Fun things aren't always rational.)

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    8. Re:Making REAL light sabers by BlueGecko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It wouldn't be that hard to make if you were able to (and allowed) to make a small nuclear reactor. But of course, nuclear=bad, so that will never happen.

      Nevertheless, you can read about how a lightsabre could work, ranging from plausible to implausible theories, as well as an introduction to kendo (the sword techniques the Jedi use) at this site: http://www.synicon.com.au/sw/ls/sabres.htm#index.

  42. More impressive than the sabers by iantf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check out this car:

    http://www.shawnandcolleen.com/shawn/Pages/hwing /

    And no, it's not a Photoshop job. I've ridden in this thing.

    -Ian

    1. Re:More impressive than the sabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is truly hilarious. One of the crappier mods I've ever seen.

    2. Re:More impressive than the sabers by Hodr · · Score: 1

      "Not a Photoshop job" he says with a straight face, despite the star wars warp space visible through the front window of car...

  43. Not a millionaire by bmarklein · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The article says he has "grossed more than $1 million" over 8 years. This does not mean he has over a million dollars in assets. It probably does mean he's making a pretty good living, depending on the expenses involved in making light sabers.

  44. In a related story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Jeff Parks is now living in a box after being sued by George Lucas. Yet strangely, nobody on slashdot talks about what a draconian bitch Lucas is.....

  45. Jeff Parks, Jedi Knight? by Passman · · Score: 1

    Sound far fetched, consider this.

    One of the trials for becoming a Jedi is to build your own lightsabre. As Mr. Parks has demonstrated, he has already done this, so that challenge is completed.

    And doing so without paying royalties to Lucasfilm could be considered defeating a great evil...

    --
    Minne-snow-da: Winter is comming...
  46. Touch-sensitive buttons by Mike1024 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey,

    Minichino, who bought his Arc-Wave in 1999, also likes the touch-sensitive button that turns on the light panel and blade.

    Yeah, they are the best type.

    (You see? It's funny!)

    Michael

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  47. Obligatory PA Post by duren686 · · Score: 1

    You mean like this?

    --
    Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
  48. Get a server by WiggyWack · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should use some of that $1 million to buy a new webserver.

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  49. Well.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    if you read.. you'll see he's not making authentic replicas of the original props.. but rather just cool looking light-saber like thingys.

    BTW.. people selling props made out of the same parts as original props (You have to love how creative they were back then) are selling sabers for well over a grand.

  50. as opposed to the more common method by unformed · · Score: 4, Funny

    of forcing the public to become customers by new legislation

    1. Re:as opposed to the more common method by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      Oh like the auto insurance industry?

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
  51. This has to be our fault. by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 1

    I guess I am not the only one who read the article and went on a hunt for Jeff Park's work(s). thelightsaber.com appears to have suffered a /., or just by strange coincedences, it is unreachable.

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
  52. The Duels would not be that interesting by danielobvt · · Score: 1

    It would basically be like that scene in the Holy grail where the black knight get his extremities lopped off. He who hits first with a real saber wins.

  53. Why? by NeuroManson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Why do women like jewelry?" Parks asks. "The light saber reaches an emotional need to feel like a hero."

    More like the light saber reaches an emotional need to overcompensate for having a teeny tiny eensy weensy penis...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Why? by MO! · · Score: 1
      Ummm does that mean that women with a jewelry addiction are overcompensating for a stinky stanky stretched and skanky vagina?

      btw - here come the flames... (pulls on fire resistant gear)

      --
      I AM, therefore I THINK!
    2. Re:Why? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1, Troll

      Ooooh, must have struck a nerve in one of the mods to get modded down as a troll for making what most normal folks would see as a joke... A JOKE... Repeat after me, a JOKE... Yeesh...

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    3. Re:Why? by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      Ahhhyes, the moderator in question must (a) have a truly microscopic penis, and/or (b) one of the lightsabers written about in the article, because he modded me down even more! Wow, Slashdot hecklers are worse than those in Vegas! When you die at the Palace, you DIE at the Palace... But hey, you have oh, 2 mod points left, and I can keep posting so it'll keep showing, try and silence me, slug! And I have karma to burn too! So NYAH!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:Why? by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      Nah, that's why they drive SUVs... Warning, completely humorless small penised /. mods a'coming, act busy, you've seen NOTHINNNNG!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  54. Not everyone is large by Wee · · Score: 2
    What about us skinny ectomorphic geeks? I came across his site a couple months ago, and the belt was what almost made me buy saber. Thne my wife came in and saw what was on my monitor. That was the end of that.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Not everyone is large by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Skinny ectomorphic geek...with a wife? LIAR! FRAUD!

      ...just a joke, son. Move along. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Not everyone is large by Wee · · Score: 2
      Skinny ectomorphic geek...with a wife? LIAR! FRAUD!

      No, just lucky... :-) -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    3. Re:Not everyone is large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I came across his site a couple months ago, and the belt was what almost made me buy saber. Thne my wife came in and saw what was on my monitor. That was the end of that.

      Yeah... you sound lucky.

    4. Re:Not everyone is large by oojah · · Score: 1

      According to dictionary.com, ectomorphic is: "having a lightly-muscled build with long limbs"

      This means that you are effectively saying "What about us skinny lightly built long limbed geeks?" - you don't really need to say skinny in there. I am not having a go here, but if I was doing, there is a word I could use and say "Ah, but that is ..." and I do not mean redundant. What is the word? Anybody?

      Ta,

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    5. Re:Not everyone is large by Wee · · Score: 2
      I know what the definition of "ectomorphic" is -- that's why I used the word. I intended to put a comma in between "skinny" and "ectomorphic" but it didn't make it in there for some reason. If I had known about the scrutiny paid to my post, I'd have proofread more carefully.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    6. Re:Not everyone is large by oojah · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I'm not bothered about your post - I just wanted to know what the word is that I describe.

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    7. Re:Not everyone is large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tautology.

      tautology Pronunciation Key (tô-tl-j)
      n. pl. tautologies

      Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
      An instance of such repetition

      There you go :)

      Tony

    8. Re:Not everyone is large by Wee · · Score: 2
      Tautological? Pleonastic?

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    9. Re:Not everyone is large by oojah · · Score: 1

      Ah, tautology. That's the one I was thinking of.

      Thanks :)

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
  55. Better stuff from Master Replicas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Master Replicas has better stuff. Including models that make the appropriate "wooom" sound when you wave them.

  56. google cache by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    sigh.. here it is
    here

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  57. American civil war? by zhar · · Score: 1

    "It's a world where Senators and Representatives grant "emergency power" to the executive branch, which the executive branch promises to return to the Senators and Representatives as soon as the current crisis is over. (But, of course, the executive never does return that power.)"

    Try the Roman Republic. This was a reference to when Julius Cesaer refused to give up the powers of dictator to the Roman senate.

    --


    DRINK DUFF (responsibly) DRINK DUFF (responsibly) DRINK DUFF
    1. Re:American civil war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that the United States of America is in the same situation, currently, and also why many Executive Orders reference a pressing "emergency", right?

  58. Only the weak minded. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    So yeh, that would probably work with Lucas, if the last two movies are any indication of his mental capability...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  59. Look again. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    That site has no adds, and is still up. It must be a paid account or something.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Look again. by MartinB · · Score: 2
      It must be a paid account or something.

      If you had a $1m turnover business whose target market were all heavy online users, wouldn't you be keen to make sure your site stayed up, even if it meant paying for it?. I think so.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  60. Not necessarily a millionaire by imnoteddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The article states "has grossed more than $1 million" which is not the same as the submitter claims "made himself a millionaire". He has expenses. Maybe he's spent all the money.

    Can't people read?

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
    1. Re:Not necessarily a millionaire by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Simpsons episode where they find out how much Skinner makes in a year & multiply it by his age to find out that he's a "millionaire."

      "But I wasn't working when I was 1!"

  61. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's going to need more than a 'fake' lightsaber to fend off the slashdotting. :)

  62. I Own One. by Spencerian · · Score: 5, Informative

    Parks makes the replicas to look faintly like versions used in the movies. They are typically aircraft aluminum, and are very, very tough and scratch resistant. Some are designed for a blade, others just hang on your belt and make people ask if it works.

    The item I have is based on Luke's first/the Graflex design. It serves its purpose well enough for the costume during the occasional con or costume party. If you want a "lightsaber" of your own, Jeff does a good job.

    Lucasfilm generally does not chase down anyone who avoids the use of trademarked names and likenesses or is otherwise obviously capitalizing on his vast empire. Otherwise, people who make costume templates and accessories, especially the stormtrooper stuff and droid parts, would be sued immediately.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:I Own One. by peterein · · Score: 1

      hang on your belt and make people ask if it works.

      So has this ever happened to you?

      Luser: Ooh, shiny! Does it work?
      You: Yes.
      Luser: Totally awesome dude. Turn it on! *starts to drool*
      You: *waves hand* You do not need to see me turn it on.
      Luser: I do not need to see you turn it on.
      You: *waves hand* Move along.
      Luser: *moves along*

    2. Re:I Own One. by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2

      Isn't the size of the handle a little smaller. These seems to be children toys, good replicas but with smaller proportions than the real prop ones. What do you say?

      PPA, the girl next door.

      --
      -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    3. Re:I Own One. by Spencerian · · Score: 2

      I can't count the number of times that someone has taken the thing, stuck it up to their eye, pressed the bogus buttons and asked if it worked.

      If only the mind tricks really worked.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    4. Re:I Own One. by Spencerian · · Score: 2

      No--the props are based for an adult's hand. They have the same size and proportions you would expect. They aren't like the oversized saber toys with the telescoping blades.

      The one I have is the Defiance model, which superficially looks like Anakin Skywalker's Jedi saber, the one that Luke first receives from Ben Kenobi. It weighs about 2 pounds, and hurts if you attach it the wrong way to your belt and have it swing the wrong way into your crotch.

      ::sigh:: I really need to get out more often.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    5. Re:I Own One. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, better if it did work then they wouldn't bother you again after putting it up to their eye and turning it on...

  63. Is it even possible to stop a laser beam... by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    ...after a few feet, so it doesn't shine forever like a laser pointer? And what about the thickness of the beam? Would a beam an inch thick be more dangerous to look at? Is it even possible? Would it do any cutting, or would it be just like a thick laser pointer?

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Is it even possible to stop a laser beam... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Well, actually... You can't see a laser beam without dust or some other sort of fine particle floating in the air. Anyone with one of those cheap laser pointers that you see in business all the time can tell you they never see the beam.

    2. Re:Is it even possible to stop a laser beam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you can see the beam in ThinkGeek's new green laser pointers. Or so they say.

    3. Re:Is it even possible to stop a laser beam... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Try this (pay attention to the 2nd paragraph down) for some down to earth talk of laser beams. No, I haven't looked at ThinkGeek's stuff. And too, you can see any laser (green, /.-loved, or otherwise) provided you have enough particles in the air. Otherwise, it's a bright source with a point at the end. ;).

  64. May the force be with his server... by SoCalChris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Luke... I slash dotted your site!

  65. Uber Nerd by tim0thy · · Score: 1

    "So that would make this guy an uber nerd" Shamlessly ripped from the Conan O'Brein's "Triumph The Comic Dog" skit.

  66. Knives at a Gun Fight by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    FWIW, it's typically regarded as better to shoot the bad guys from a distance instead of let them get close. Just a thought. :)

    This is the old axiom of "Never bring a Knife to a gun fight"

    In which regard, it is interesting to read an early draft of Stars Wars, dated 1975

    [NB - the Luke in this script seems to be different than the "StarKiller" character, as seen from the very final scenes]

    Goes hand in hand with the adages:

    • Never throw shit at a man with a gun
    • Never stand beside a man throwing shit at a man with a gun
    • Never stay in a house with a man who is throwing shit at a man with a gun
    • etc.
    You get the idea
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Knives at a Gun Fight by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Don't ask a man with a flamethrower for a light?

  67. How to add your own (virtual) light saber by snowtigger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My university is running a research project on "tracking 3D textured object in the presence of aspect changes". Using a computer, a camera and holding a box in your hand, you can animate a light saber.

    Here is information about the project and this is an image of the laser sabre in action.

    Here is a movie (37Mb) showing it in action.

    Now, all you have to do is to buy the handle from parksabers.com to get the real feeling ;o)

  68. Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm still not sure how you can always get it to cut though things without turning stuff into gas


    I just tried this, you may want to attemp it yourself:

    Requirements:
    - Potato (1)
    - Knife (1 - preferably sharp)
    - Cutting board (optional)

    Directions:
    1. plase cutting board on a stable surface
    2. place potato on cutting board
    3. Slice through potato with the knife

    Voila! no hazardous gas has been produced.

    besides, it could really be particle separator with a light display so you don't hurt yourself.

    1. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it that you can spell 'preferably' and 'hazardous', but not 'place'? Inconceivable!

    2. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep saying that, I do not think it means what you think it means.

  69. Still waiting for this one by ehiris · · Score: 2

    Yoda's lightsaber will be released on July 1st.

    "Glowing electro-luminescent blade and authentic sound effects pulled directly from the movie" sounds very interesting and would be a good addition to my Lightsaber key chain.

  70. Why are still talking? by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    The street lights are on little boy. Go home.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  71. Parks is not the only one... by PHPee · · Score: 1

    It looks like Parks is doing quite well with his light sabres... Has anyone seen some of the other companies selling light sabre replicas? Like Future Horizons or Amazing1.com

    I'd be interested to know how they compare in quality of construction, durability, brightness, etc...

  72. Always a fun subject. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    You're first problem is power output, as stated. I guess we can assume that we'll get portable high energy power sources around that size some day, so lets ignore that one for now. You're next problem would be beam confinement. Making a highly destructive beam is the easy part. Confining it to sword-like dimensions is a bit harder. I'm no partical physisist, but maybe you can use the same technique they use to cancel out soundwaves-- Have beam "B" become 180' out of phase to beam "A" at a range of, say, 2 1/2 feet from the projector. Feel free to poke holes in that one all day long :) Now, technology providing, we have a nice 2 1/2 foot partical sword with only one problem... A distinct lack of kinetic action when said beam encounters a similar beam. There would be no duels here, just simple slicing and dicing. Instead of the phased beams, I guess you could use a magnetic bottle to limit the beam... Somehow. Then maybe you could have actual physical blade contact. Jeez, what a pain in the ass. Maybe I'll just stick to ultra sonic virbrating blades :p

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  73. Next slashdot poll... by Barto · · Score: 1

    Favourite Lightsaber (http://www.parksabers.com)?

    Arcwave
    Defiance
    Echelon
    Fury
    Malestrom
    Rou ge

    1. Re:Next slashdot poll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no Cowboy Neil?

  74. The irony is palpable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hell, it's the weekend, there's hardly anyone on here, but us sad nerds can still have fun.

    Trolling and flamebaiting is what you do for fun, and you're poking jokes at his social life?

  75. Graflex and Light Sabres by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I run a photography website (actually, one of the first photography websites), Graflex.org.

    Lucas used a Graflex flashgun to make the light sabre prop, and as a result photographers and camera collectors have seen prices rise absurdly, now to hundreds of dollars for old flashbulb equipment that used to be available for $5-$15.

    And furthermore, some of the folks who buy them are belligerent and abusive. I guess if they think you can become a millionaire, I understand now.

  76. Re:Curses! Foiled again! by unitron · · Score: 2
    "...now to take over the world by selling fast food, containing a minute dose of alkaloid..."

    You mean like the original version of Coca-Cola?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  77. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sometimes its best to not read between the line and just enjoy the movie because thats all what it is.

  78. I'm surprised nobody has yet mentioned .... by ayden · · Score: 3, Funny

    The potential cross-over product between the Lightsaber and sex toy industry. Click here to check out Count Dooko's Lightsaber and see what I mean.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
  79. Re: your sig by ObitMan · · Score: 0

    Are you sure not just a Suborbital Ballistic-Propulsion Engineer?

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
  80. Humming by Woek · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cool to have Soiid-State gyroscopes analyse the rotation of the handle, and produce that cool humming sound accordingly? Could be made really cheaply...

  81. Laser Swords by tweggen · · Score: 1

    And can anybody please explain, why in the IV-VI movies' german translations these light sabres are called laser swords (Laserschwert) ?
    Did they try to avoid violating any trademarks?

  82. Safety saber by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

    Ben: Your father's lightsaber. This is the weap-

    Luke: What's that red thing on the end?

    Ben: Uh...that's so you don't poke someone's eye out...This is the weapon of a Jedi Kni-

    Luke: What about the blade - does it retract? Huh? Does it?

    Ben: Uh...NO you have to remove it when not in battle. Uh...where was I..oh yeah, THIS is the weapon of a Jedi Knight. Not as clumsy or-

    Luke: And what about a sort of cool swirling noise? Does it have one of those?

    --
    "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  83. OT: superfluous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that the word you're looking for is superfluous

  84. I'll buy one when... by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
    ... he builds one around an electric screwdriver so I can carry it around at work.

    And it would be even better if it made the lightsaber noise when in use rather than the usual scredriver sound.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  85. Copyright, Sheesh! by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    I dont see why he should be allowed copyright "Light Saber". It unfair to copyright pre existing chunks of the Enlish language.

    The Open Office spellchecker marks light saber as correctly spelled. This is because the Saber (a type of sword) could be either heavy or light.

    On the other hand the compound word lightsaber, is not an already legitimate English phrase is is harder to confuse. Perhaps the distinction between "light saber" and the capitalized "Light Saber" is adequate for Copyright (capitalized in the Article but not in your post).

    The life of the author plus 70 years? Seriously can you even imagine anyone wanting to use that movie Willow Lucas made, or Mcirosoft QDOS by that if the information actually manages to survive that long.

  86. Movie physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall reading somewhere (no, I don't know where or I'd have a link) that the Star Wars light sabre is a laser beam that arcs back onto itself into reciever ports - thus recharging itself continuously. No actual power output unless it contacts something. Terran physics does not currently include a way to arc a laser beam, especially at merely a meter. The theory is understandable, but the execution is not likely.

  87. Really cheaply being a relitive term by Nf1nk · · Score: 1

    Last I checked a digital gyroscope (the type used for model helicopters) went for around $50 and the attached analog circuitry could probibly be built for around $20, so I figure you are adding about another $100 per blade (gotta pay someone to make this cool little circuit). looks to me like this would increase the cost on these things by 25-40%. This would make it not a cheap mod.
    But it would be cool

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  88. Re:Curses! Foiled again! by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    Actually, someone beat you to that as well, but with a twist..

    Have you had the swedish meatballs at Ikea? They aren't terribly addictive, but they sure do put you in a buying mood ;-)

  89. ATTN all nerds: by vladedivac · · Score: 1

    Since you're not getting laid, you might as well watch this: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/tv/nerds.htm l

  90. Re: your sig by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Meaningless distinction. : )

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!