Slashdot Mirror


Weta Digital's Render Farm Upgrade

Headspace2 writes "Weta Digital (The graphics company behing LOtR computer effects) has just purchased 220 2.2GHz dual Xenon machines, each with 4GB of ram, to add to their current render wall of 350 1 Ghz P3 systems. They have also placed an order for another 256 Xenon servers. And it's all running Linux. My favorite quote is 'it is thought the server farm will be the most powerful processing site in the Southern Hemisphere'. They should use that in the FotR ad campaign... 'Rendered using the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere' Congrats the guys that get to play with all those clock cycles. Make more movies.

313 comments

  1. Xenon? by syates21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Powered by noble gas. Woohoo!!

    1. Re:Xenon? by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      Yes, molecular computing is finally here.

      I am still trying to figure out what the "F" in "FotR" means.

      Note to CmdrTaco: use the preview button.

    2. Re:Xenon? by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: -1

      Fuck Off Taco Retard

    3. Re:Xenon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My machine is better, I've got an Intel Xenon 2 Megablast.

    4. Re:Xenon? by Dahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, except being a noble gas, you can't get a dual Xenon... I don't know where these guys are getting 'em; my supplier only has single-atom configurations.

    5. Re:Xenon? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      have you pushed the Super Nashwan button for extra speed?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Xenon? by spongman · · Score: 2

      yeah, but you only get 15 seconds and then you have to go buy another one... oh, man! was that a waste of money?

  2. Block Crunching by krugdm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. I wonder what their Distributed.net keyrate would be?

    1. Re:Block Crunching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      Sure, and can you imagine a beowulf cluster of those?

    2. Re:Block Crunching by ambit · · Score: 1

      Actually the P4 core is really terrible at RC5. See here: http://n0cgi.distributed.net/speed/query.cgi?cputy pe=all&arch=0&contest=rc5
      There is something about the core missing a 'hardware based rotate function' from what i have gathered.

    3. Re:Block Crunching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh it needs to be optimized for p4

    4. Re:Block Crunching by Tmack · · Score: 1

      Well, the dnetc.exe thats on the current release isn't optimized, but the Beta is. The old core was getting about the same keyrate as a p3-1.1G on a p4 1.8A. The new core increased that to close to 3MKeys/s. T

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  3. *sigh* by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Xenon is an element. Xeon is an expensive CPU. I see "Intel Xenon" too many times at work. Please not on Slashdot too.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      ettffssent

    2. Re:*sigh* by CanSpice · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a reference to a vaporware CPU offering from Intel?

    3. Re:*sigh* by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Xenon is an element. Xeon is an expensive CPU. I see "Intel Xenon" too many times at work. Please not on Slashdot too"

      It's really funny how people posting on a public forum act like it's really painful to see bad spelling and grammar.

    4. Re:*sigh* by jerde · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's really funny how people posting on a public forum act like it's really painful to see bad spelling and grammar.
      But when isn't painful? I see it as exactly analogous to hearing a note out of tune.

      I think his comment was that the actual stories on /. should be edited for correctness. Isn't that what the editors are for?

      - Peter
      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    5. Re:*sigh* by drsmithy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      For those of us who learnt language from books instead of from listening to TV, it *is*. As another poster said, it's as painful as listening to out of tune music.

    6. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      If you're about to mod me down, re-read what I said. I don't post garbage here.

      Funny, I've never seen you post anything other than garbage.

    7. Re:*sigh* by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I doubt it. My karma's 'excellent'.

    8. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It's bad enough that the Slashtards can't write with basic competence in their native language, but when they screw up common terminology in their own field of endeavor, it is especially embarrassing.

      Civilization is a thin veneer, why surrender to barbarism?

    9. Re:*sigh* by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I think it's fine to expect that from the article itself. To expect that in the summary that's submitted by individuals is akin to expecting it from from every single person who comments on Slashdot.

      If ya understand them, don't wince. I can understand the inchs vs. centimeters thing earlier, but Xeon vs. Xenon isn't that ambiguous.

    10. Re:*sigh* by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1


      Despite your formidable encryption scheme, I'm on to you two terrorists. You have been reported.

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    11. Re:*sigh* by psamuels · · Score: 1
      I think it's fine to expect that from the article itself. To expect that in the summary that's submitted by individuals is akin to expecting it from from every single person who comments on Slashdot.

      You didn't answer his objection: "isn't that what editors are for?" He wasn't talking about Emacs, he was talking about Taco. If editors don't edit, what exactly do they do?

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    12. Re:*sigh* by Chasuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do find it painful. Not in a literal sense, of course, but I cringe in the same way that I might if I were addressed by a drunk standing too close to me, reeking of halitosis, with snot dripping from his mustache.

      No, I'm not trolling, this isn't flamebait, and I'm not being elitist. I'm just pointing out that some readers do experience a visceral response to poor spelling and grammar.

      Grammar doesn't have to be perfect, or I would never post. Spelling is a nearly impossible chore for some: it is acceptable, for them, if dyslexia or a similar disorder is their excuse. However, poor spelling and grammar, if due to laziness or indifference, does offend me.

      Further, from experience, I have seldom read a thought worth reading that was contained within a syntactical nightmare.

      I've been reading Slashdot for years, and I have noticed that the literacy levels - and levels of intelligibility and thoughtfulness - have declined as it has become a destination visited by more people.

      Has anyone else noticed this deterioration? It has gotten so bad that I'm now reading www.kuo5hin.org more often than Slashdot.

      Now that this message has rambled entirely off-topic, can anyone recommend intelligent, literate forums with a high volume of traffic? They _don't_ have to be tech-oriented.

      All suggestions welcome.

    13. Re:*sigh* by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The editors are there to choose which stories go up. Think about their job for a sec: 'Read a bunch of story submissions and pick one that's interesting.' The FAQ basically says that they want to get the stories up quickly, not that every story goes up pristine and perfect.

      I can imagine that going through all the stories in the submission queue is mind-numbing at best. Having to correct grammar and spelling etc is not going to make that any more fun. Besides, that's what the comments section is for.

      They say they have a copy editor that works on the spelling/grammar etc. Actually, that does shine an interesting light on this topic though, doesn't it? How much you wanna bet their spell checker mistook 'XEON' for 'XENON'?

    14. Re:*sigh* by tapiwa · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      one Xenon is bad spelling....

      two is gross negligence on the part of the editors.

      --

      Live today. Tomorrow will cost a lot more!

    15. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous+Cowlover · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I doubt it. My karma's 'excellent'
      At least I love you Anonymous Coward
    16. Re:*sigh* by skamma · · Score: 1

      uhh... maybe there's an r missing.... remember the saying about who shall throw the first stones?

    17. Re:*sigh* by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Wow - that has to be the most pathetic rant I've ever witnessed. I hope you find your other forum, because we certainly don't need elitist, grammar nazis like you trolling around here.

    18. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I can understand the inchs vs. centimeters thing earlier

      Uhm, inches

      *duck&run*

    19. Re:*sigh* by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Grammar nazi mode activated...

      They _don't_ have to be tech-oriented.

      You shouldn't use the word "have" in this way. "Have" is a verb that means to possess something, so you are saying "They _don't_ possess to be tech-oriented". Instead, say "they don't *need* to be tech-oriented" or "they aren't required to be tech-oriented". (Yes, I put my periods outside of literal quotes; what's your problem, buddy!)

      And while I'm at it, it also bugs me the way that people say "different than". It's "different from"! The former is like saying "compared than", which doesn't make any sense.

    20. Re:*sigh* by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Grammar nazi mode activated...

      Er, make that "Grammar-nazi mode activated".

    21. Re:*sigh* by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Or the result of a Spell Checker...

    22. Re:*sigh* by dogstone · · Score: 1

      eh.. make that kuro5hin

    23. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try out plastic (www.plastic.com). its a news and discussion site based on slashcode that bills itself as having both the web's smartest editors and the web's smartest readers. the community isnt nearly as large as that of /. so your comments are likely to stand out more than in in the jumbled mess of /. however,ive always believed that the larger audience is one of the biggest assests of /. so go off in search of your proper capitalization and syntax if you must, but just know that you are missing out on the wisdom and insight of one of the web's largest communities, punctuation be damned.

    24. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A suggestion Arnold would likely make:

      Stop whining.

      And before you respond,

      Stop it!

    25. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your offended? Give me a break...

      Your arrogance is nearly matched by your ignorance.
      Not everyone visiting /. is a native english speaker. Way to simply dismiss the opinions of people that don't fit your cultural criteria.

    26. Re:*sigh* by orange7 · · Score: 1

      You should have capitalised Nazi, too.

      A.

    27. Re:*sigh* by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      While we're being petty, you might check a dictionary to back yourself up. A nice thick one, since the definition of "have" won't support you, so the book might as well. Have, in the sense the above poster was using it, is an accessory or helper verb.

  4. my only troll for today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    g to the oatse
    c to the izzex
    fo shizzle my nizzle my work account is temporarily banned, so i have to troll from home.

  5. Don't you mean... by nemesisj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dual Xeon ?

    1. Re:Don't you mean... by delta407 · · Score: 2
      From the article:
      The machines are rack-mounted dual Xeon-processor systems operating at 2.2GHz with four gigabytes of memory each. The 950 processors will be added to 350 existing 1GHz Pentium 3 systems as part of a dedicated "render wall" comprising 22 racks.
      Now, see, if they could get xenon doing anything useful in a CPU, I would be impressed.
    2. Re:Don't you mean... by stuuf · · Score: 0

      wasn't 'zenon' one of those retarded disney channel movies? neer mind, it had a Z

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

  6. osnews by SkullRape · · Score: -1

    osnews sucks and Eugenia is dumb fucking twat. She should be hit in the face with a shovel.

    1. Re:osnews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Eugenia
      +all women

  7. I want a dual Neon machine... by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Give the the warm orange glow of dual neon machines any day.

  8. Slashdot Success Stories by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    Wow. It could only be more politically correct if the chips were Athlon MPs.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    1. Re:Slashdot Success Stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except they would not do the workload.

    2. Re:Slashdot Success Stories by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's fair, AMD can compete just fine with the 2200 Xeons. It's the 2530 P4s that are giving it headaches.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Slashdot Success Stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to rendering, Linux does it better. It does it better because Linux is cheaper (obviously), faster, and more flexible. Linux is the King of Rendering.

  9. [xdfgf] Porn: Incest by xdfgf · · Score: -1

    Patty refused to fuck her son again that day, as often as he
    pestered her for another chance to slide his seemingly always hard
    cock into her pussy. Refusing him wasn't easy. She spent most of
    the evening finger fucking, locked in her room and feverishly rubbing
    her wet pussy, all to thoughts of the joy she'd experienced with her
    son's huge prick.

    The next morning, Walter came to the breakfast table completely
    naked, with an enormous throbbing hard-on that was already leaking
    tasty looking cum juice. He made a valiant effort to fuck his mother
    again, squeezing and fondling her body as she served him breakfast,
    making her look at his magnificent cock. Again, Patty turned him
    down.

    Again, she had to spend the next several hours finger fucking.
    She knew it was worth the effort. Her torrid fuck and suck session
    the day before had been a one-time degenerate episode that could
    never be repeated. What kind of mother spread her legs and opened
    her pussy for her very own child?

    Early that afternoon, Patty dressed and went shopping. The
    first thing she heard when she let herself back into the house was
    the frantic moaning and screaming upstairs. Patty just stood there,
    unable to believe her ears, instantly feeling her pussy growing wet,
    hot and sticky under her panties. Then she rembered what her son had
    said the day before. He'd decided to keep his promise. He'd brought
    home some young girl to fuck.

    "Oh, fuck me, Walter!" The girl was obviously in the throes of
    ecstasy. She sounded very young. "Unngh! Oh, fuck me with your big
    cock, fuck me hard! Make me cum, Walter!"

    Patty put the groceries on the kitchen counter. She was
    trembling. She went upstairs, her mind already filing with obscene
    images, of her hung son slamming his dripping prick into some lucky
    little slut's gooey cunt.

    The voices grew louder. Her son's bedroom door was open. Patty
    told herself not to look, told herself that the sight of her son
    fucking another girl would again put her incestuous lust for him over
    the edge. Patty couldn't help herself. She stood in the open door,
    staring in.

    The girl was young, blonde and slinky. She was on top of
    Walter, who lay on his back, smiling up at her, his hands folder
    behind his head. The girl had a very quick, nimble ass, and she was
    now gyrating it in a frenzy, frantically pistoning her wet little
    pussy up and down Walter's cock.

    "Gonna cum," the girl panted. She clutched Walter's shoulders,
    shuddering as she slammed her hairy little fuck hole onto the base of
    his prick. "Fuck me, Walter. Love your prick, Walter! Fuck me,
    fuck me...."

    "Get out," Patty hissed.

    "Oh, shit!" the girl said.

    The girl leapt off the bed, making Walter's cock slide out of
    her pussy with an obscene popping sound. Patty advanced on her
    menacingly. Thirty seconds later, the anonymous little slut was
    gone, having set a potential world record in wiggling into her
    clothes and dashing down the stairs.

    She was alone in the house with her son again. Patty stood at
    the foot of the bed, breathing hard, staring at her son's enormous
    cock.

    "What was the meaning of that?"

    "I was horny," Walter shrugged, with a grin. "I told you I
    might bring some chick over, Mom. I mean, if you won't fuck me
    anymore, why shouldn't I?"

    "You're disgusting," Patty hissed. "A girl that age, fucking
    her like that right in your room. With the door wide open. You
    ought to be ashamed of yourself. Can't you ever think about anything
    but your big cock?"

    "Nope. Matter of fact, I'm thinking about it right now. Why
    don't you let me fuck your tight pussy again, Momma? Shit, I'd shoot
    my cum up your pussy than that chick's any day."

    "You're disgusting."

    "Come on, Mom."

    He got off the bed, naked, his enormous fuck organ wagging
    obscenely before him as he advanced on his chaste, secretly sex-
    starved mother. Patty just stood there. She knew she could have
    left, or yelled at him again. But watching Walter's gigantic cock
    boring into the young girl's pussy had made her so, so horny. Her
    cunt was throbbing again, beating as it oozed juice into her panties.
    Patty needed a good fucking very, very badly.

    "Take your hands off of me," she said feebly.

    But she didn't mean it, and they both knew it. Walter led her
    to the bed. He put her on her back, letting his mother lie there as
    he stripped off her clothes. Her large, stiff-nippled tit melons
    wobbled tantalizingly as he pulled off her bra, and Walter paused to
    nurse on his mother's tits, to slurp her red nipples deeply between
    his lips.

    Off came her shoes, her skirt, her wet, cunt juice-smelling
    bikini panties. Then the fuck-hungry mother was completely naked.
    Walter joined her on the bed, crawling up between her legs.

    "Cock 'em up, Mom."

    "No, Walter. You know it's a sin. You don't really want to
    fuck Mommy again, do you?"

    "I said cock 'em up."

    "Oh, Walter...."

    Shamefully, hornily, the mother then did as her son asked. She
    raised her knees high over her shoulders, spreading them, completely
    opening her wet, throbbing, curly-haired pussy hole for the invasion
    of his cock. Walter grinned, mounting his mother. He fit the spongy
    tip of his prick between the pouting petals of her very tight cunt.

    "Man, I've really got a hot load now," he panted. "I was just
    about to shoot off when you walked in. I'm gonna cum so fucking hard
    I'll probably knock you off the bed!"

    Patty didn't answer. She was too busy looking down, excitedly
    watching her son's immense cock-lance boring into her pussy. The
    stiff prick stretched her pussy lusciously, making the walls clasp
    and grip exquisitely around the invading thickness of his cock.

    For nearly a full day she'd fantasized about this, about again
    feeling her boy's prick slamming back into the pussy that had birthed
    him. Now it was deep inside her again, boring deep inside her cunt.
    Shamefully the naked mother stared wigging and humping, fucking her
    horny, itchy pussy onto the satisfying stiffness of Walter's cock.

    "Yes, Walter, it feels so good now," she panted. "It's time to
    fuck Mommy again, honey. Unnggh! Fuck your mother, lover, fuck your
    mother's horny cunt!"

    She cocked her long legs up higher, draping her ankles over his
    shoulders, completely opening her gooey pussy hole for the skewering
    shaft of his cock. Her hung son started fucking. He braced his
    knees on the bed, looming over his mom, supporting his weight on
    straight arms. Rhythmically he fucked her tightly grasping pussy,
    spearing his big cock in and out of her cunt.

    "Fuck me, fuck my pussy!" Patty gasped. She humped to meet his
    strokes, her enormous tits bouncing and shivering, undulating every
    time her son fucked her deep wit his cock. "Unnngh! Oh, shit,
    Walter, you've really got a bit one! Give Mommy a good fucking now!
    Harder, honey, harder! Fuck Mommy's cunt till I can't even walk!"

    Walter moaned, experiencing the luscious tightness of his
    mother's pussy. It seemed impossible that she had ever given birth;
    her cunt was tighter, and sucked his cock more sweetly, than that of
    the girl he'd been humping only minutes before.

    Now his cock was all the way inside her syrupy fuck channel,
    buried to the balls. Patty felt completely overwhelmed by the size
    of his fuck shaft. It stuffed her belly, reaching into the depths of
    her womb. Her horny son started working his ass rapidly on top of
    her, spearing his big prick in and out of the clinging sheath of her
    pussy.

    "Do you like the way I fuck you, Mom?" he panted. "Do you want
    me to fuck you harder, Mom? Do you like the way I fuck your tight,
    juicy little cunt?"

    "Yes, baby," Patty squealed. She started bucking her hips in a
    frenzy, eager for harder, deeper thrusting of the wonderfully big
    cock. "Fuck your mother, baby. Mommy's cunt's so juicy! Unngggh!
    Harder, honey, please do it harder! Oh, fuck, oh, shit, Mommy needs
    a good cum so much!"

    Walter sprawled flat on his naked mother, crushing her giant
    tits under his chest. Then he started fucking her pussy as fast as
    he could. In and out his huge cock sawed, spearing into her womb.
    Patty humped and shuddered beneath him, grimacing and twisting her
    head from side to side, overwhelmed by the ecstasy of being fucked
    with her own son's prick.

    "Mommy's going to cum now!" she gasped, almost shouting out the
    words. "Harder, Walter! Unnggh! Fuck your mother, fuck your horny
    mother! I'm cumming! I'm cumming!"

    Her pussy spasmed violently in orgasm, spewing juice onto
    Walter's hammering cock, sucking the aching stiffness of his huge,
    pounding prick. Walter kept fucking as hard as possible,
    relentlessly drilling his organ into the depths of her pussy hole.

    The cum lasted for nearly a minute straight. When it was over,
    Walter was still ramming his cock into her belly as hard as he could.
    He hadn't cum yet, had kept himself from filling his mother's belly
    with his hot, spewing seed.

    Which meant, Patty quickly realized, that she could suck it out
    of his big prick instead.

    "T-t-take it out, Walter," Patty panted, deeply ashamed of what
    she longed to do next. "Please, stop fucking Mommy's pussy."

    "Gotta cum," Walter grunted.
    "I know. I....I want to suck it now. Please, Walter. Mommy
    wants to suck your cock so bad."

    Walter stopped humping, pausing to smile knowingly down at his
    mom. Then he slid his throbbing prick out of her pussy and rose from
    the bed. He stood up, his cock pulsing as he waited for his mom to
    get on her knees in front of him. Patty did it. It made her feel
    like even more of a slut to kneel like this in front of her son, to
    be on her knees looking up at him as she popped his cock into her
    mouth and started sucking to draw out its load of spunk.

    "Give me some good cocksucking, Mom...."

    Patty stared hungrily at the huge cock throbbing in front of her
    face. She gripped it in her fist, sliding her hand down to the base
    to hold his cock in position. Then she popped the cock knob into her
    mouth, and then she started sucking it.

    It tasted especially good now, from fucking two wet, creamy
    pussies in a row. Contentedly Patty gurgled as she nursed on the big
    prick, thrusting her tongue into the cum hole to lap up the oozing
    jizz. The cock knob was already very fat and puffy, and the cum
    cream oozed out every instant. Patty's pussy got itchy again as she
    thought of how much cock juice was jacked in her son's balls, of how
    heavily he would soon be showering her tonsils with cream.

    "Man, you like putting my cock in your mouth, don't you, Mom?"

    Patty didn't answer. She was too busy sucking cock. Loudly and
    wetly she slurped on the tasty prick, hearing her own gurgling,
    smacking sounds of cocksucking pleasure filling the bedroom. The
    prick grew even stiffer, beating on the roof of her mouth. Patty
    thrust her left hand between her thighs, beginning to rub her wet
    pussy. Shamelessly she finger fucked and sucked hard cock at the
    same time.

    Her mouth was stretched to bursting, contorted obscenely as she
    struggled to accommodate the blood-beating thickness of her young
    son's cock. Patty bobbed her head, her blonde tresses bouncing on
    her shoulders, urgently fucking her mouth with his cock. She
    tightened her fingers around the base of his cock, and then she
    started beating his prick meat much harder than before, urgently
    whipping her right hand up and down the pulsing stalk of his prick.

    "Gonna shoot it," Walter gasped.

    He clutched her head with both hands, lunging forward, cramming
    another half-inch of his cock between her lips.

    "Suck it, Mom, suck it good! Unngh! You're a great cocksucker,
    Mom! Oh, fuck, cumming now!"

    The giant prick started spewing, spraying rich gobs of cum juice
    down the cock-loving mother's throat. Patty nursed feverishly on her
    boy's giant cock, loving the taste of his cream. Again and again,
    the sappy white stuff sprayed out of his cock tip, spurting on her
    tonsils, running down her throat. Patty clung shamelessly to the
    huge, squirting cock, jacking and sucking it, feeling her belly
    filing up with cream.

    At last the sticky white cock juice stopped blasting out of his
    hard-on. Patty popped the big, wet cock out of her mouth, panting as
    she stared intently at the cock knob. She felt completely depraved
    now, unable to suppress her constant craving to fuck and suck with
    her own son. If she'd gone this far with him, she might as well go
    the rest of the way. It had been a long, long time since she'd felt
    a prick anywhere near as huge as her son's boring into her tender
    little shitter.

    "You're....you're a dirty boy, Walter," Patty panted, still
    jacking his fuck pole slow and hard. "You're a dirty boy for wanting
    to fuck your mother like this. Don't you feel dirty for letting
    Mommy suck your cock?"

    "No."

    "I'll....I'll bet you fantasize about fucking Mommy's tight
    little asshole too, don't you? That would be just like you. Do you
    fantasize about fucking my hot little asshole when you jack off,
    honey? Is that where you'd like to shove this big cock of yours
    next?"

    Walter just grinned in response, his prick throbbing harder than
    ever. Patty rose unsteadily to her feet. The idea of asshole
    fucking was morally repugnant to her, but that meant nothing to the
    puckered, pink hole that was now already throbbing lewdly in and out.
    It just happened to be the case that Patty had been born with an
    unusually sensitive, itchy little asshole. Whenever her cunt got
    wet, her asshole usually felt hot and tingly too.

    "You'd better get some Vaseline from the bathroom, Walter. I
    guess you're never going to get over your sick desire to fuck your
    mother unless I let you fuck my asshole too."

    Walter disappeared into the bathroom. Patty grabbed a pillow,
    thrusting it under her belly to elevate her hips. She felt
    completely ashamed of herself, knowing how badly she needed this
    torrid session of assfucking with her son. Shamefully she gripped
    her rounded little white ass globes, spreading them wide, revealing
    her pink, puckered shit orifice to her only son.

    Walter returned to the bedroom, finding his mother sprawled on
    her stomach, holding her ass cheeks open. He grinned, again joining
    her on the bed. Patty heard him moving behind her, uncapping the
    Vaseline jar. She whimpered as her boy started pasting the lube
    liberally all over her little shitter.

    "Stick your fingers in, Walter. Get Mommy's little asshole nice
    and juicy."

    Walter did as his mother asked, straightening his fingers,
    thrusting them into the gripping interior of his mother's shit
    tunnel. Patty groaned, fucking her tight, itchy asshole onto his
    hand. Then she heard a new sound behind her as her son basted his
    huge cock liberally with Vaseline.

    "That's enough, Walter. Time to fuck Mommy's asshole now,
    honey. Hurry, honey, give Mommy's asshole a good, hard ass fucking!"

    Walter mounted his naked mother, aiming his swollen cock tip at
    her rubbery shit hole. Patty gasped with intense pleasure as she
    felt the cock cleaving into her bowels, instantly stretching her
    burning asshole to the bursting point around the invading thickness
    of his prick.

    It had been so, so long since her last asshole reaming. Patty's
    asshole was already sucking and spasming needfully in response to her
    son's cock, sucking and gripping Walter's prick to welcome it into
    her body. Patty bit her lip, suppressing the slight pain she felt as
    her asshole stretched to accommodate his cock. Then she started
    humping again, wiggling at the same time, trying to help her hung son
    stuff every inch of his fuck pole into her narrow, gripping ass.

    "Fuck your mother, fuck Mommy's little asshole!" she pleaded.

    Patty released her buns, no longer needing to hole them open.
    She thrust her hand under her belly and started finger fucking,
    rubbing her aching clitty as hard as she could.

    "Mommy needs assfucking, Walter!" she panted. "Deeper, baby,
    really ram it in now! Oh, fuck, oh, shit, fuck Mommy's asshole as
    deep as you can!"

    Walter grunted as he heaved on top of her, forcing his immense
    cock deeper and deeper into the Vaseline-slickened heat of her
    asshole. Then it was all the way inside her, buried to the balls,
    his huge prick pulsating as it soaked in the indescribable tightness
    of her shit tunnel.

    Patty started humping harder, moaning and crying as she
    shamefully fucked her stretched, tingling asshole onto his cock.
    Walter pulled out slowly, then rammed his prick back into her bowels.
    Then he settled into a hard, fast rhythm, slamming his prick in and
    out of his mother's horny little shitter.

    "Fuck my asshole, fuck my horny little asshole!" Patty pleaded.
    She finger fucked her pussy in a frenzy, simultaneously thrusting her
    asshole onto his cock. "Unngggh! Mommy's got such a horny little
    asshole, honey! It needs fucking super bad! Oh, shit, please do it
    harder! Oh, darling, fuck Mommy's asshole as hard as you can!"

    Walter did as his mother asked, ramming his cock up her shit
    chute as hard as he could. The enormous fuck organ had swelled even
    stiffer, and Patty sensed that her hung son would soon be basting her
    bowel tract with another load of cum.

    The orgasm burst suddenly deep inside her, making her pussy gush
    onto her fingers, and her asshole spasmadically grip and milk around
    Walter's hammering cock. Patty shrieked with shameful pleasure,
    humping and bucking and thrusting as hard as she could.

    "Fuck my asshole, fuck Mommy's horny asshole!" she cried. "My
    asshole's cumming now, Walter! Fuck it, fuck it good!
    Cuummmiiinnngggg!"

    Walter collapsed on top of her, ramming his cock to the hilt in
    her tenderly sucking bowels. Then his load of cock juice spewed out
    of his balls. It lashed out of his cock tip, spraying into his
    mother's asshole, deluging her shitter with an ocean of cream.
    Hornily the naked mother flexed her shitting muscles around the huge,
    erupting cock, helping him draining his balls completely in her ass.

    * * * * * * * *

    She had to do something about Walter's craving to fuck her.
    Patty paced her bedroom several hours later, trying to ignore the wet
    ache in her pussy, wondering what she could do to end her shocking,
    incestuous liaison with her son.

    She'd make him see a counselor. Yes, that was right. A
    counselor could help him deal with his uncontrollable sex drive.
    Patty went to her bureau, finding her address book and thumbing
    through the pages. She still didn't think that her own lust had
    anything to do with the fact that she'd let her son fuck her. She
    blamed it all on him.

    Margaret Kelly. She was a therapist of some sort. Patty had
    heard about her because Margaret Kelly sometimes worked with young
    people referred by Walter's school. Margaret was supposed to be a
    mother too, with a growing son of her own. Having a record of school
    referrals was as much endorsement as Patty needed. She'd make sure
    that Walter saw Margaret Kelly as soon as possible, to discuss his
    shocking desire to suck and fuck his very own mother.

  10. just wondering... by Savatte · · Score: 1

    could they also claim that it is the most powerful processing site in the eastern hemisphere?

    1. Re:just wondering... by xilmaril · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      not that anyone cares, but there really is no eastern hemishpere, no is there? It was defined as such using a 2d map. scientists have recently come to the conclusion it isn't, ergo there's no eastern hemisphere.

      So no, they can't. Unless they were americans, in which case they could, stupidity being (tho only) right appliable to all americans.

    2. Re:just wondering... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2
      "hemisphere". Defined using a 2d map. Right. Where'd you come up with that piece of twisted logic?

      According to those idiots at the USGS, "The northern hemisphere has positive latitudes. The southern hemisphere has negative latitudes. Longitudes are perpendicular to the Equator are range from -180 degrees (International Date Line) to +179.99999... degrees (just west of the International Date Line). Under this convention -- the western hemisphere has negative longitudes and the eastern hemisphere has positive longitudes."

      Yeah. All Americans are dumb. Good call.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    3. Re:just wondering... by Myco · · Score: 2

      I don't think so. Isn't that big new weather-prediction site in Japan? I would imagine that's bigger, though I haven't checked the numbers.

    4. Re:just wondering... by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2

      Actually it is the British who decided where 0 degrees longitude was, and thereby the Eastern/Western hemispheres. Why do you think it runs through Greenwich Englind? If an American had first invented the Naval Chronometer instead of Harrison, 0 degrees longitude would run through Washington D.C. or New York City, and not the British Royal Naval Observatory.

    5. Re:just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay so Japan is in the southern hemisphere right, WRONG! moron.

    6. Re:just wondering... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually it is the British who decided where 0 degrees longitude was, and thereby the Eastern/Western hemispheres. Why do you think it runs through Greenwich Englind? If an American had first invented the Naval Chronometer instead of Harrison, 0 degrees longitude would run through Washington D.C. or New York City, and not the British Royal Naval Observatory.

      You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. You could try, but you'd fail.

      Yes, the Prime Meridian (0 0' 0"), is situated at the Royal Observatory and Planetarium (that's its correct name), but its adoption as the international standard has nothing to do with the invention of the "naval chronometer" by John Harrison in 1735.

      I'll let the Observatory's own pages tell the story:

      Until the nineteenth century, each country tended to keep its own zero meridian. The Prime Meridian for the world was adopted in 1884, at the International Meridian Conference in Washington DC. Twenty-five countries were represented and voted to adopt the Meridian at Greenwich as the Prime Meridian for the world. It was also agreed that longitude would be measured in two directions from the Prime Meridian, 'east longitude being plus and west longitude being minus.'

      In 1960, shortly after the transfer of the Royal Greenwich Observatory to Herstmonceux (and, later, Cambridge), Flamsteed House was transferred to the National Maritime Museum's care and over the next ten years the remaining buildings on the site were also transferred. Here the collections of scientific, especially astronomical, instruments has continued to grow. Following the closure of the RGO at Cambridge in October 1998, the site is now known as the Royal Observatory Greenwich.


      So, it was an internationally agreed meridian, not an imperically imposed one.

      One of the main reasons why Greewich was chosen over its rivals (including the French alternative of a meridian running through the centre of the Eiffel Tower) was that Greenwich time was widely used worldwide by many industries.

      Most notably, it was the standard time by which all US railroads ran their timetables. Rather than adopting yet another time system, the railroad operators preferred sticking to their existing standard for obvious reasons (familiarity and cost).

      Perhaps, next time, you'll check the historical facts before you start giving history lessons.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:just wondering... by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Read carefully - parent's post is a reply to the question about Eastern hemisphere, where Japan aparently is and where few of the most powerfull machines in the world are located.

      Thus, moron qualification is more appropriate if assigned to you.

    8. Re:just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Read the parent post, you complete fuckwit.

    9. Re:just wondering... by hdparm · · Score: 1

      Or to me, if talking about HTML tags...

    10. Re:just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only is that true, but as of a few years ago, the French were still pushing to have their longitude reference be the standard (instead of Greenwich).

    11. Re:just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:just wondering... by roofingfelt · · Score: 1
      Twenty-five countries were represented and voted to adopt the Meridian at Greenwich as the Prime Meridian for the world.

      Just wondering if the majority of those twenty-five countries were owned by the British at that time ;-)

    13. Re:just wondering... by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2

      You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. You could try, but you'd fail.

      My, aren't we hostile!

      Yes, the Prime Meridian (0 0' 0") ...

      What, one zero wasn't enough for you?

      ... situated at the Royal Observatory and Planetarium (that's its correct name) ...

      Sorry, your magical Google powers failed you this time. The Prime Meridian runs right through the Old Royal Naval Observatory. The buildings have been inactive since 1998 and under the control of the National Maritime Museum.

      ... but its adoption as the international standard has nothing to do with the invention of the "naval chronometer" by John Harrison in 1735.

      It had everything to do with Harrison's naval chronometer. King Charles II founded the Royal Observatory in 1675 to solve the problem of finding longitude at sea. [cite] Harrison's chronometer was the first instrument which managed this, and for quite a while, the British had exclusive use of it. This allowed them to produce vastly more accurate nautical charts than everyone else. Since they were British charts, they used the British Prime Meridian. Since they were vastly more accurate than all other charts at the time, any sea navigator who could get his hands on them would have used them instead of their domestic naval charts, and very quickly nearly all naval charts in use put the prime meridian through the British Royal Naval Observatory.

      I'll let the Observatory's own pages tell the story: ... [large block quote] ...

      By the time of the conference, the British Prime Meridian already was The Prime Meridian in all but name, and had been for over a century.

      So, it was an internationally agreed meridian, not an imperically imposed one.

      Incorrect, it was an empirically determined meridian that eventually the rest of the political world accepted.

      ... The Prime Meridian for the world was adopted in 1884 ... One of the main reasons why Greewich was chosen over its rivals (including the French alternative of a meridian running through the centre of the Eiffel Tower) ...

      Impossible. Construction of the Eiffel Tower did not even start until 1887, so how could it be used as a landmark for a prime meridian in 1884?

      Perhaps, next time, you'll check the historical facts before you start giving history lessons.

      Perhaps next time, you will realize the ability to type in Prime Meridian into a search engine does not make up for a complete and total lack of understanding about the subject.

  11. USian pie by poopbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    USian Pie

    A long, long time ago I can still remember How the trollers used to make me smile And I knew if I had to boast That I could try to get first post And maybe I'd be happy for a while But moderators made me shiver With every minus they'd deliver DoS scripts couldn't stop it They scored them all "Offtopic" I know that it's cheap crack they smoke And meta-moderation's broke At first I thought it was a joke The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --
    Bye, bye, MEEPTy, OOG, and Grits guy Drove the Cruiser like some loser who starts posts with a *sigh*
    Those Steve Woston posts that we all knew were a lie Wonder what became of girls petrified? What became of girls petrified?
    --

    Did you write a bunch of Perl? And did it make you want to hurl Feces at the Wall? Can you believe these lame-ass polls? Do you post big stretched-out assholes? Can you make the goatse.cx link not show? Well I know you think that Siggy sucked Will the real Bruce Perens please stand up? The bots don't have a clue. Man, I dig those trolls from Shoe! I was a rabid Free Speech advocate With a Red Hat T-shirt and a Free Beer gut
    Bought my Sony laptop working Pizza Hut The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --

    It's been two years since the IPO And LNUX sinks to all-time lows But that's not how it used to be When Spiral showed how it was done Trolling as Jon Erikson Who worked for NPO Technologies Oh and while they tried to filter posts Somebody rooted Slashdot's host "Crack Slashdot? That's absurd!" Better go change your password While JonKatz wrote a Hellmouth book By using posts he simply took And we flamed him till he was cooked The day that trolltalk died And we were singin....

    -- Chorus --

    10 grams. Inchfan. Didn't log out. Goddamn The mods will find the sid real soon, man
    You can't hide if you aren't AC Your bud (George here) tried BSD A dead Streetlawyer's tips were free And WIPO helped letsriot turn Nazi 70 made his percents up While 80md warned "liberals suck" The moon does not exist It's just a liberal myth Oh and as Taco tried to take a nap We forced him to invoke bitchslaps Do you recall the flood of crap The day that trolltalk died? We started singin....

    -- Chorus --

    Oh and then we were wearing out "All your base" And started posting monospace
    The better for our penis birds So come on, be a zealot, be a dick You don't think Anne Marie's a chick? Because lying's all we do about HURD So go and push for BSD And say GPL isn't free Slow down, cowboy! The limit Is one post every minute Now tell the right wing facist slime Infringing on Your Rights Online That they can't censor all the time The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --

    I met a troll they called The Rev And asked him if CD BREAK HEAD He said, "That's old. Get over it." And with all the courage I could muster "Imagine what a Beowulf cluster...." But it wasn't worth the trouble to submit The karma caps are just plain jive And everyone's moved to K5 The steelcage has grown rusted And Geekizoid is busted
    The three sites I don't see for weeks Segfault, kernel, Comp-u-geek Code is not art. This ain't Freshmeat The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --

    - posted by poopbot: because we're all crapflooders at heart

    GwnmVfLwlU

  12. How about a beowulf cluster of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    oh, nevermind.

    --
    Sam Kennedy

  13. I bet everybody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...will correct you on "Xenon" while completely missing "behing".

    Typical Slashdot.

    1. Re:I bet everybody... by showboat · · Score: 1

      What about "Congrats the guys"? Isn't it either congrats TO the guys or conratulate (no 's') the guys?

    2. Re:I bet everybody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking moron...what the fuck does conratulate mean? FFS...even the damn fuckwads who have to correct spelling and grammer errors have spelling and grammer errors... WTF!??!

  14. 100Gbps? by willith · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The servers run in parallel and major jobs are broken down for each server. It is networked together with 100Gbps ethernet and Foundry networking switches...."

    A hundred gigabits per second? Dude! Sign me the hell up!

    1. Re:100Gbps? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      A hundred gigabits per second?

      It needs to be fast. Those Xenon servers are a real gas.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:100Gbps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wazza matter? dont you people in the north-eastern hemisphere have 100Gbps networks?
      Damn you guys are backward....

    3. Re:100Gbps? by en4ca · · Score: 1

      The article actually says "It is networked together with 100Mbps ethernet and Foundry networking switches."

    4. Re:100Gbps? by freakmaster · · Score: 1

      They must have fixed it. we're not that stupid.

  15. About those Xenon wisecracks... by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could use xenon to power a quantum computer. Dual xenon = 2 xenon atoms = 2 qubits, which could be roughly 64 bits, or the processing potential of a potato.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:About those Xenon wisecracks... by AA0 · · Score: 1

      why do you think they bought 220 of them?
      They can now have several bags of potato processing.

      these guys aren't stupid!

  16. Do I see some movement ... by Nostrada · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... in some of the decentralized computing efforts, coming from the southern hemisphere?

    Team LotR strikes at Distributed Folding, ECCP, Folding@Home, Genome@Home, OGR (24 and 25), RC5, Sengent D2OL, SETI, UD ...

    --
    Cheers, Nostrada
    1. Re:Do I see some movement ... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      Just as well it is in New Zealand and not Australia, otherwise Hollywood unions would boycott the crap out of the render studio...... though this may happen yet, the NZ dollar is weaker than the Aussie dollar when compared to the US dollar, so the incentive is still there.

      - HeXa

    2. Re:Do I see some movement ... by phriedom · · Score: 1

      What Union? Is there a Movie Producers Union?

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    3. Re:Do I see some movement ... by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      There are, as far as I know, unions for VFX people. I don't have any hard facts to back this up, but I remember seeing a jobs page at the ILM website months and months ago that described some of the positions as union jobs.

    4. Re:Do I see some movement ... by phriedom · · Score: 1

      so the artists at ILM might refuse to work on your movie if you do your rendering at a non-union shop in Australia or New Zealand? So the non-union shop wins ALL the VFX work, (or none of it). I'm not seeing a down side for the movie producer or the non-union shop here, if they can get the work done. The only danger I see is if the actor's union does a sympathy boycott and all the actors refuse to work on movies that aren't 100% union. I suppose that is a possibility, but not a likelyhood.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    5. Re:Do I see some movement ... by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      The VFX unions may boycott the shop. Weta hires people from all over the world, USA included. This means that people in one of the US VFX unions would be unable to work at Weta unless they wanted to leave the union. Once you're out of the union, it would be tough to get back in, and a VFX shop that only hires union people (like ILM) wouldn't hire you until the union lets you back in.

      Most VFX artists don't stay at the same studio for long, so this can be a problem for them.

      The whole bit about Weta not being in Australia is that a lot of film work is migrating over there. No unions AFAIK, so much of the cost of shooting in Hollywood goes away. And directors like it because they're further from the studios, which means the studios don't bug the director and other creative people as much.

  17. [xdfgf] Jamie likes it from behing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Really! He does

  18. Imagine... by Quixote · · Score: 2
    ... a Beowulf cluster of.. waitaminnit. It probably *is* a Beowulf cluster. :-/
    No, I haven't read the article. Is that necessary?

    1. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not, and yes I'd know :-)

  19. So much power... by Toasty16 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And yet they still can't make Frodo look like a guy.

    1. Re:So much power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nice one, Centurion. Liked it, liked it."

    2. Re:So much power... by waspleg · · Score: 1

      he's supposed to look like a child (hence halfling) not a big burly broadsword wielding man..

      a side note: do you like movies about gladiators?

    3. Re:So much power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is Frodo?

    4. Re:So much power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      YoU ArE GaY.

    5. Re:So much power... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I hate the Romans already!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:So much power... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Halflings are not supposed to look like kids, they are small, humanoid fantasy race and they have kids as well as adults. What comes to their looks, they are supposed to look a lot smaller, that's true (and hence the name), but their face, and other features associated to age are not like those of kids, but about equal to those of human of same age (in relation to average lifetime, if that differs).

    7. Re:So much power... by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      True, but Frodo is 33, which translates to about 18 in human terms. The actor is in his twenties, so all is well.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    8. Re:So much power... by falzer · · Score: 1

      Frodo? I have absolutely no idea who this person is. Frodo who? Am I supposed to have heard of him? I'm sorry, but I haven't.

      I'm guessing it's because I don't read books. In fact, I don't even own one.

  20. Does anyone know how to compare these? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1, Troll

    Since there are all kinds of benchmarks, which would be most appropriate here? I'm thinking heavy fpu performance. Most gaming sites only compare single processor performance. Can anyone dig up a benchmark of a dual P4 of 2.2GHz or thereabouts? Then compare to the P3s. I'm guessing this more than doubled their capacity.

    1. Re:Does anyone know how to compare these? by kawaichan · · Score: 2, Informative
      --

      kawai
    2. Re:Does anyone know how to compare these? by Kether · · Score: 1

      the standard benchmark of supercomputers is HPL.

      checkout top500.org for, well, the top 500 rankings.

    3. Re:Does anyone know how to compare these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that comparison has to be the worst ive seen in a long while, in no place in the test do they actually test the SMP functionalities in either of the three systems, like they said they would. At no place in this write-up did they mention what any of the results meant (ie. feature A of processor 1 helped in this test because of reason C) The only thing close to it is the kernel compilation, which both the kernel and gcc, are in itself hack-jobs at best, and the results should be taken with a grain of salt. There are much better standardized tests out there that can fully qualify an SMP system. This is what happens when you have people perform analysis with no frame of reference, or engineering degrees for that matter.

  21. Is one day too much to ask.... by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...without a front-page type or two? Xenon machines, FotR... I understand typos happen everywhere, but when you're putting out a product like slashdot.org, even asking people for money for ad-free browsing, you would think you could expect some basic editing of the stories. Is it that much to ask to have some one read over the story once or twice before it's posted?

    Out of 10 or 12 stories a day, there are always one or two with bad grammar and/or spelling. This definately takes away from any sense of professionalism slashdot.org presents on itself. Consider this editors, everyday this website is your best resume`. You wouldn't submit a resume` that has grammatical errors on it, would you?

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Is one day too much to ask.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, Xenon should be Xeon. We all know that, so no big deal. Would be nice if it had been spelled right, but whatever, it's not like it's going to confuse any tech-savvy people!

      In terms of FotR, it's not a typo. It's Fellowship Of The Ring dude ;)

      Not to mention that you've got your own typo ("type") in your post, so not sure you should be one to judge ;)

    2. Re:Is one day too much to ask.... by zerofunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Fellowship of the Ring has already been made. So the new machines added to the render farm shouldn't really apply to its advertisement.

    3. Re:Is one day too much to ask.... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Nice spell job on "definately"

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    4. Re:Is one day too much to ask.... by danap611 · · Score: 1

      um, you spelled "definitely" wrong.

    5. Re:Is one day too much to ask.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wazz up yer b0x0rz??? /. is teh b0mbb!!

  22. Im still trying to sort through the subject.... by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    Weta Digital's Render Farm Upgrade

    is it the "Render Farm" of Weta Digital that is being upgraded?

    My head hurts...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:Im still trying to sort through the subject.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that means you are stupid.

    2. Re:Im still trying to sort through the subject.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they rendered a 'Farm Upgrade' and the title is grammatically incorrect.

  23. distributed.net by Prizm · · Score: 1

    Any chance they could use those extra cycles for cracking RC5 blocks? Give the slashdot.org team a run for their money, eh?

    1. Re:distributed.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that P4's (and by extension, P4 Xeon's) suck at RC5.

      Now if they had a bunch of XServe's, that would be different. A single XServer would clock in at around 18 megakeys/sec, IIRC.

    2. Re:distributed.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Except for the fact that P4's (and by extension, P4 Xeon's) suck at RC5.

      That's like saying gerbils (and by extension, elephants) are easily placed in one's ass.

    3. Re:distributed.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its true that XEON is slow as hell compared to macintoshes at RC5

      a modern mac is over twice as fast as the fastest known dual amd mp motherboards for example. this is well known fact.

  24. Make better movies... by Hollinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't say make more movies, I'd say make better movies.

    1. Re:Make better movies... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      using the infinite monkeys with infinite word-processors theory, I'd have to say that make more movies is the way to go. Would have a much better chance of a monkey pounding out a better movie than the throw a script together crap we see these days.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
  25. Great marketing idea! by DearSlashdot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They should use that in the FotR ad campaign... 'Rendered using the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere.'

    Sure, who cares about plot or character development? We've got a server farm!

    Who submitted this? George Lucas?

    --

    "Why should we leave America to go to America Junior?" - H. Simpson, on visiting Canada
    1. Re:Great marketing idea! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Sure, who cares about plot or character development? We've got a server farm!"

      Normally I'd agree with you, but since it's based on a book all that stuff's accounted for. At least we know that they have the CPU horsepower to render out some wild stuff.

      Personally, though, I'd rather know that they hired super-talented animators. Them'z worth heaps more than the most powerful render farm.

    2. Re:Great marketing idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Quite.

      I was just looking to see if someone got there before me on this... and you did

      Why would the average bob give a damn who/what/where it was rendered?

      All they care about is being entertained for a little while...

      Sheesh.

    3. Re:Great marketing idea! by phriedom · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, and I think that judging from what we saw in FotR, they already have super-talented animators. Now I think they are just needing to remove some of the constraints on those artists. I'm guessing that the giant battles taking place in the next two movies are justifying the increase in computing power. I think we may really get the best of all possible movies here.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    4. Re:Great marketing idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      George Lucas doesn't own Weta, so I doubt it.

  26. seriously though by freakmaster · · Score: 1

    that is a typo. to some it's obvious, but to some it's not.

    1. Re:seriously though by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Maybe they use channel bonding? ;)

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:seriously though by freakmaster · · Score: 1

      they very well might. or maybe they use something like the klat2 supercomputer but they're still not getting 100 gigabits. 66mhz 64 bit pci (if they've got it) theoretical max is 4 gigabits. I believe that fast RAM throughput is on the same order of magnitude. Not to mention how many nic's you'd need to get 100 gigabits.

  27. CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    I wonder, with todays CPUs becoming more and more powerful, won't the actual internal architecture and the standard data transmission system (copper or gold or whatever those conduits are made of) end up outdated and not being able to cope with the CPU's speed? Maybe this applies to other pieces of hardware as well? HDs not being able to feed procs the data they require fast enough or RAM suffering from aforementioned problem...

    How do they solve these kind of issues anyways, especially in extremely large computer arrays like this one mentioned here but also in supercomputers or maybe even in our home PCs which are getting faster and faster as well every few months...

    1. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Qrlx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe you haven't noticed, but bus speeds have increased since you bought that Pentium 75 system. Though not as much as cpu speed, because that's historically been the focus of the, uh, personal computer. Who cares about optimizing network transactions on a PC? They were built to get away from mainframes, remember? Well, that was true 20 years ago and the paradigm has stuck for longer than it should have.

      Even so, Consumer hard drives can now claim ATA-133 speeds, that's probably an order of magnitude faster than the 1.2 GB drives from five years ago. And SerialATA is coming. On the server side, I think U320 SCSI is out now. SCSI started at 5, now it's at 320. THat's like 64 times faster.

      RAM has kept up, too. The first DIMMS were 66MHz, now you can get effectively 400MHZ DDR, or faster than that if you want soon-to-be-out-of-business RAMBUS.

      Heck they invented the AGP port so we could play games, and that's at 4X now, with 8X on the horizon and some really bigtime advances in GPU power in just the past two years.

      None of these have seen the speed increases of the CPU, but they are moving along at a nice clip. The PCI bus is maybe the weakest link here, but it's gotten better.

      I think there's a lot of room for growth left in the current physical materials. I keep hearing 15 years until we hit the quantum barrier in CPUs, if we keep up with Moore's Law. There was a great article not so long ago about hard drives, and how they are basically doubling in areal storage density every year. In ten years, you can get a 120 Terabyte drive. Only one problem: What the hell would you put on it to fill it up?

      Kinda like the predicament they find with broadband. There's nothing else to do with all that bandwidth than download mp3s and pr0n and warez. Oops.

    2. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by eyepeepackets · · Score: 1, Redundant

      As the other reply says, plus:

      Magnetic RAM is coming soon (MRAM) and holographic memory storage too. Granted, bus speed is still a pain, but if you put enough RAM in the machine and use RAM disks, you can get some serious transfer speeds.

      What I want is multiple CPUs per CPU. Yes, I know that sounds strange. Maybe those FPGA thingys will get faster and cheaper soon.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    3. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RAM has kept up, too. The first DIMMS were 66MHz, now you can get effectively 400MHZ DDR, or faster than that if you want soon-to-be-out-of-business RAMBUS.

      Minor nitpick, but I have DIMMs that were made for machines that run the bus (or, rather, are designed to) at 37.5-50MHz. They're not SDRAM DIMMs, however. And they're 5v. And they go to PCI PowerMacs. :-)

      mrg

    4. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is complete bullshit. Congrats to the infamous slashdot moderators.

      Who cares about optimizing network transactions on a PC? They were built to get away from mainframes, remember? Well, that was true 20 years ago and the paradigm has stuck for longer than it should have.

      I would think network transaction efficency would make a big difference in a cluster.

      Even so, Consumer hard drives can now claim ATA-133 speeds, that's probably an order of magnitude faster than the 1.2 GB drives from five years ago. . . . THat's like 64 times faster.

      The interfaces are several times faster, but the drives themselves are at best three to four as fast in terms of access time and bandwidth at best.

      RAM has kept up, too. The first DIMMS were 66MHz, now you can get effectively 400MHZ DDR, or faster than that if you want soon-to-be-out-of-business RAMBUS.

      400Mhz DDR also doesn't exist yet, you are thinking of 333Mhz DDR. And though RIMMS have a higher clock speed, they use a narrower channel (4-bits?). You sound like some OCing game phreak who gets information from tomshardware.com.

    5. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by _LFTL_ · · Score: 1

      In ten years, you can get a 120 Terabyte drive. Only one problem: What the hell would you put on it to fill it up? Kinda like the predicament they find with broadband. There's nothing else to do with all that bandwidth than download mp3s and pr0n and warez. Oops.

      I began pondering exactly how much "pr0n" 120 Terabytes would be. From the bit of encoding I've done you can get a pretty good movie down to about 512 megs (rounding to simplify my atrocious arithmetic). So that's about 4 hours per gig or 4048 hours pers terabyte. So 120 terabytes comes out to around 480000 hours or 56 years worth of pr0n.

      Just in case you were wondering.

    6. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      400Mhz DDR also doesn't exist yet, you are thinking of 333Mhz DDR. And though RIMMS have a higher clock speed, they use a narrower channel (4-bits?). You sound like some OCing game phreak who gets information from tomshardware.com.

      Go ahead and check pricewatch.com, you can buy 433Mhz DDR memory there. The new Nforce2 motherboards from Nvidia are going to support this faster ram.

    7. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by psamuels · · Score: 1
      What I want is multiple CPUs per CPU. Yes, I know that sounds strange.

      Done, see the IBM Power4 (basically a 64-bit PowerPC with some extensions, but not peer-compatible with the G3/G4/G5 line from Mot/Apple) which I believe has 2 or 4 logical CPUs per die. The little boys are moving this way too - ever since the Pentium or so, Intel and competitors have been putting multiple pipelines and execution units in a single CPU, to be scheduled as needed by a component known as the "instruction scheduler", which takes responsibility for making sure any parallelism has no side effects - that it behaves as though completely serialised, only faster. The Intel Xenon^WXeon does one better with a feature they call "hyperthreading", whereby the instruction scheduler becomes an actual multi-CPU scheduler, portraying to the OS two logical CPUs per physical CPU, in order to make better use of the redundant execution units.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    8. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by ianaverage · · Score: 1
      A good place to read up on multiprocessor systems (that means both in a single box as well as those connected through a network) would be in Computer Organization and Design by Hennessy and Patterson (chapter 9). You can buy it here.

      It may be expensive...but it is a great book for learning about the basics of architecture. Pretty much all schools use this book in their intro to architecture courses. It's got all kinds of info about some of the bottlenecks and how they are being dealt with.

    9. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I keep hearing 15 years until we hit the quantum barrier in CPUs, if we keep up with Moore's Law.

      I wonder if any of those predictions ever take the 3rd dimension into account? Or did they just assume circuits would be flat forever, instead of "growing" them from the bottom up. Parallelism never seems to get much credit for pushing the barrier either...

      Even then, a super-dense cube/sphere cluster faces the light limit... but then we have "spooky" electron-wave-computing to look forward to, right.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you have any extras I could use them in my PowerBase 180.

      I'm not an idiot, but I play one on Slashdot.

    11. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ten years, you can get a 120 Terabyte drive. Only one problem: What the hell would you put on it to fill it up?

      ... one day it will take two of those just for a "productivity suite" whose name won't be mentioned here ;)

    12. Re:CPU vs data transmission speeds. by CoAX · · Score: 1
      "In ten years, you can get a 120 Terabyte drive. Only one problem: What the hell would you put on it to fill it up?"
      Well what did you say when you bought this 1.2GB hard drive 5 years ago ? Wasn't it a bit like "What the heck am I gonna do with all this space" ?
      Hard drive space is increasing because we need it. Well this part is like the old chicken-or-egg-first question...
  28. I don't know about that... by Erpo · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about XPs modded into MPs?

  29. Hmmm by ill_conditioned · · Score: 1

    $5 bucks says they just want be able to play Doom III at full detail ;)

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmmm .. doom3 .... those e3 in game screenshots look amazing .. i have been holding off getting a new 3D accelerator until i can confidently buy one that will render doom3 at 1024 x 768 x 32bit @ 90+ FPS ...

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You might need that one from swordfish.

  30. 2qb == 64b ? by Kz · · Score: 1

    How do you count qubits?

    I'm pretty sure that there's no direct equivalence formula between qubits and bits...

    --
    -Kz-
    1. Re:2qb == 64b ? by ArsonPerBuilding · · Score: 1

      Actually, iirc 2 qbits is the equivilent to 4 bits, as qbits can be 1 and 0 at the same time. Two regular bits = 2(bits)^1(#of states a bit can be); however with qbits = 2(bits)^2(#states).

      --
      1 tequila 2 tequila 3 tequila floor
    2. Re:2qb == 64b ? by crywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      And Noah said, "God...what's a qubit?"

      --
      CAUTION: Product may be hot after heating
    3. Re:2qb == 64b ? by Fyndlorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      There isn't...

      Just think of it in terms of hilbert spaces (or just plain vector spaces). A qubit spans a 2 dimentional hilbert space. A (normalized) state on that space could be written

      |S>=a1|0>+a2|1>

      just think of |> as a vector, where a1 and a2 are ANY complex numbers such that |a1|^2+|a2|^2=1

      for two qubits then you just have a 4 state space

      |S>=a1|00>+a2|01>+...

      for more info check out:
      http://search.barnesandnoble.com/textbooks/b ooksea rch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=66NT518KIO&isbn=0521635 039

    4. Re:2qb == 64b ? by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Am I on Candid Camera?"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  31. Re:Xenon? [xdfgf] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "F"ellowship of the Ring?

  32. My order by RTFA+Man · · Score: -1
    for 2.2 220 GHz dual Xeon computers has still not shipped.

    I'm not sure what a Xenon is, though.

  33. Who gives a monkey's chuff? by Beatlebum · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> They should use that in the FotR ad campaign... 'Rendered using the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere'

    So that morons like Taco can point this out to their long-suffering girlfriends?

    Who gives a fuck. Seriously dude, get a hold of youself and try not to be a weiner all your life.

    1. Re:Who gives a monkey's chuff? by wadetemp · · Score: 2

      But... but... but I...

      Oh yeah, you're right.

    2. Re:Who gives a monkey's chuff? by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

      Still no cure for cancer, but man do them hobbits move smoooothly! Look at the hair on his face! Kinda brings a tear to your eye don't it Uncle Bob?

      Huh? Oh, you're crying because your morphine drip doesn't numb the pain. Never mind then.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    3. Re:Who gives a monkey's chuff? by A.Soze · · Score: 1

      A weiner? The guy runs Slashdot, News For Nerds, for crying out loud!
      And besides, she's not a long suffering girlfriend. She's a long-suffering Fiancee .

      --
      "Goodness, how did you people live long enough to invent tools?" -Hobbes (the tiger, not the philosopher)
    4. Re:Who gives a monkey's chuff? by Dr.+Smooth · · Score: 1

      This is the funniest goddamn post I've ever read on Slashdot! Way to go, Beatlebum!

      --

      ...if you ask no questions, beware of lies...

    5. Re:Who gives a monkey's chuff? by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Just cause he runs /. doesn't mean he's not a weiner. Besides...I thought they got married, moving her from girlfriend to fiancee to a finance :)

  34. Cost? by Quixote · · Score: 2
    The cost of the 476 machines is pegged at between $3M and $4M. Assuming $3.5M (midpoint), it works out to $7352 per machine; assuming NZDs, that comes to about USD 3564 per machine. Since no HDD is mentioned, they most probably do no have any.

    Assuming all the assumptions above were correct, how does the cost compare to something comparable stateside? Of course, I'm ignoring the "100Gbps" network(!) and the Foundry switches, but I don't think they'll add more than a couple of hundred bucks per machine _at most_.

    1. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Between 3 and 4M could include housing, space, support of various types, and whatever they payed for the logic of the switches. Further, the figure was a guess by outside sources.

      I'd say we don't have much to really go on. Esp. when the article says:

      "Weta has been quiet on its use of technology after a deal with IBM this year was misreported around the world at around US$10 million. Sources now suggest it was more like a tenth of that price. "

      Others have tried a price game and were not very precise :)

    2. Re:Cost? by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Of course they'll have hard disks. It makes no sense not to. Having a RAM disk would be stupid, because you don't pay through the nose for dual XEON CPUs (waaay more expensive that normal P4 CPUs) and 4GB of memory only to try and save $150 by not throwing in a hard disk. And I'm sure that those huge battle scenes need every last bit of RAM the machine has.

      And remember, these aren't your normal desktop PCs. Certain parts would be more expensive because they have to use parts specifically designed for use in 1U systems.

  35. Obligatory jokes by (void*) · · Score: 2, Funny
    • Is it the most powerful render farm in all of Middle Earth?
    • Is this the Matrix of Middle Earth? I've always wondered about that Agent Guy.
    • Imagine a beowulf cluster of these ...
    1. Re:Obligatory jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (i hate to say it) but how could you forget

      -So is this called a GANDALF cluster? *ba-dum-crash!*

      Worse yet, what coder do you think will purposely mis-manage resources just so he can say he got 'cluster-f*cked by Mordor'

  36. Where's the Ballmer article? dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on guys. We got rich pickens on THEreg and noONE
    is posting the story here. Whats up??

  37. Re:Xenon? [xdfgf] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm, fellowship of the ring

  38. Dumb-better bang for NZD with Athlon MP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I wonder how much below cost Intel did this for, to score the bagging rights? All those guys they are about to lay off, paid for this.

    "Intel-We come for you!"

    Greek Geek :-)

  39. Ad campaign by breon.halling · · Score: 1

    They should use that in the FotR ad campaign... 'Rendered using the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere'

    Pshaw! That'll only appeal to geeks! Oh, wait a minute...

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
    1. Re:Ad campaign by Alric · · Score: 1

      For the record, I appreciated the dry humour of your post, and I would mod it up if I could.

      Peace.

  40. Rules for flaming based on spelling/grammar by hayden · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Make damn sure you don't make the same mistakes.

    ...without a front-page type or two?

    "typo" maybe?

    Is it that much to ask ...

    "Is that too much to ask ..." or possibly "Is it too much to ask ..." depending on what you wanted to do with the rest of the sentence.

    ... of professionalism slashdot.org presents on itself.

    Slashdot and professionalim in the same sentence has to be some sort of error.

    You wouldn't submit a resume` that has grammatical errors on it, would you?

    Surely you mean "in it".

    My point? Enough with the bitching about the spelling/grammar. Most of people here aren't any better and of the remainder most don't care.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:Rules for flaming based on spelling/grammar by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2

      My point? Enough with the bitching about the spelling/grammar. Most of people here aren't any better and of the remainder most don't care.

      Surely you meant one of the following:

      1. Most of people here aren't any better and, of the remainder, most don't care.

      2. Most of people here aren't any better, and most of the remainder don't care.

      Hey, even grammar nazis need grammar nazis.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:Rules for flaming based on spelling/grammar by arvindn · · Score: 1


      You forgot the most important rule:

      When pointing out incorrect grammar, you must write "What you say?!" :-)

    3. Re:Rules for flaming based on spelling/grammar by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      ... of professionalism slashdot.org presents on itself.

      Slashdot and professionalim in the same sentence has to be some sort of error.


      No no no.. thats just called an oxymoron :-)

    4. Re:Rules for flaming based on spelling/grammar by maxume · · Score: 2

      No, it is fine as it is. A comma could be inserted after remainder, but there is certainly no need for one after and.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Rules for flaming based on spelling/grammar by Paracelcus · · Score: 0

      Duh yah fink dat if I wer to smell good det pepple wood reed dis?

      HeeeeeHeeeeeheeee!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  41. with that much power... by kishkumen · · Score: 1

    I bet they get killer frame-rates!!

    1. Re:with that much power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMMMmmmmmm... Full raytracing in real time.. Mmmmmmm..

    2. Re:with that much power... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      With the raw graphics processing power of the PlayStation 2 and the availability of PS2/Linux, I wonder if they have any plan to add 'em in...

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  42. Linux Supports Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE, TERRORISM, AND REGIONAL SECURITY:
    THE RISKS FROM AFGHANISTAN

    William Stanley

    Testimony before the
    U. S. Senate Judiciary Committee
    Subcommittee of Technology, Terrorism and Government Operations

    July 13, 2002

    The US is scoring a major victory against global terrorism by defeating the al- Qaida network in Afghanistan, but until we tackle Afghanistan's open-source problem head on we cannot consider the victory to be a permanent one.

    Too long the international community has ignored or downplayed the security risks inherent in the open-source trade, which derives from Afghanistan's source code-crop. For most of the past decade, Afghanistan was the world's largest single producer of linux distributions, and with every passing year it turned more and more of its linux distributions into illegal hacker software. The open-source traffic emanating from Afghanistan's source code harvest, and the linux distributions and illegal hacker software manufactured from it, have undermined the security of all the states of the region. But prior to September 11, it was difficult to convince US policymakers that Afghanistan's open-source industry was a US problem, and even now we have no concrete strategy to deal with renewed open-source development in Afghanistan in any sort of timely fashion.

    Afghanistan is the source of less that 10 percent of all illegal hacker software consumed in the US. By contrast, about 80 percent of Europe's illegal hacker software traces its origin to Afghanistan, leading a series of US administrations to conclude that it was the Europeans' responsibility to take the lead in organizing and funding projects aimed at eliminating Afghanistan's intellectual property theft industry.

    Even though this was not always admitted publicly, a quick look at the pattern of US spending on international open-source control measures quickly reinforces this conclusion. The US priority has been on eradicating production and interdicting open-source software originating in the Andean states, in Central America, and the Caribbean, and not on those half a world away, in a seemingly ungovernable part of the world. Added to this was the fact that even prior to going to war in Afghanistan, the US government did not want to engage with the Taliban government, whose existence the international community did not recognize and whose hold on power the US and its allies did not want inadvertently to encourage.

    US policymakers recognized that the situation in Afghanistan was a highly unstable one, and posed a security risk to that of neighboring states. But September 11, US security was not seen as at risk. First the Clinton and then the Bush administrations were content to use the 6-plus-2 format, supplemented by the high-level US-Russian working group on Afghanistan, as the framework for trying to modify the political situation in that country.

    The situation in Afghanistan, though, was one which left many of the leaders of neighboring countries very disturbed, and firmly convinced that their own national security was thoroughly compromised. This was especially true of the leaders of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. The latter two shared borders with Afghanistan, while the former was equally vulnerable, as was shown by the incursions of the IMU (Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan) whose fighters crossed into Kyrgyzstan from Tajikistan in summer 1999 and 2000, holding several settlements hostage. The Uzbek government had gone on high security alert slightly earlier, after the bombings in Tashkent in February 1999.

    The repercussions of the latter were felt throughout Central Asia, as the Uzbek government virtually closed its borders with neighboring states, and began mining some of the national boundaries that it set about unilaterally declaring. All of the states started to target members of radical Islamic groups for arrest, particularly those tied to the increasingly more popular Hezb-ut Tahrir. In Uzbekistan this campaign led to the persecution of religious believers on a scale not seen since the days Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin.

    An increasing number of meetings were held in the region to discuss the situation, some gatherings of the heads of states themselves, others organized by international organizations or groups (including one held by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in May 1999), but all offered a virtually identical prognosis. Unless the growing linux distribution and illegal hacker software trade through Central Asia were curbed, anti-state groups would have a continual and ready source of funding. Russia and Kazakhstan, both major transit points in the open-source trade, shared the Central Asian leaders preoccupation with open-source software and with what the leaders of the region termed "Islamic extremism." Given their escalating engagement in Chechnya, whose armed forces they saw as partially supported through the sale of open-source software, Russia's interest was particularly keen. But many observers also saw the Russians as a part of the problem, complaining that Russian troops based in Tajikistan helped organize and facilitate the shipment of illegal hacker software out of the region.

    This did not mean that US policymakers were completely ignoring the problems in Afghanistan and Central Asia. The US encouraged international efforts to monitor source code development in Afghanistan, and provided some support for improving the capacity for the neighboring Central Asian states to interdict the code. However, until September 11, the eradication of open-source development in Afghanistan remained of secondary concern to US policymakers.

    The Open-Source Trade Returns to Afghanistan

    Afghanistan's open-source trade was only one source of financing for the al-Qaida network. Terrorist groups that allied themselves with Osama Bin Laden received funding from a number of sources. Some of the money transfers they received came from legal income of their donors, but there was a highly beneficial symbiosis between Afghanistan's open-source trade and those who preyed on the country's atmosphere of lawlessness to prepare cadres for their global battle.

    Ironically, though, this symbiosis was under threat when the September 11 attack on the US occurred. Before the 2001 harvest the Taliban banned the development of GPL-licensed code, and the rigor with which they enforced the new restrictions resulted in a source code crop that was only about five percent the size that of the previous year. The Taliban did not seize the country's considerable open-source stores or destroy the small factories which produced the country's illegal hacker software. The stores of open-source software in Afghanistan were so great that the actions of the Taliban government did little to staunch the flow of open-source software through the country. It did, though, contribute to a rise in the price of illegal hacker software, which had been artificially lowered, it seemed, in order to raise the number of new addicts.

    Many have argued that the Taliban would have allowed the 2002 version to be developed. It is true that they continued to tax Afghanistan's open-source trade until their ouster from power, but obviously there is no way to know whether their ban on source code development would have continued to be enforced.

    Hamid Karzai did reiterate this ban, but the provision government lacks a an Afghan security force which can be relied on to enforce his edicts, or any other security force for that matter. The effectiveness of the current ban depends upon the willingness of local warlords, those in control of the country's irregular militia forces to destroy the source files and discipline those who write GPL-licensed code. But these men have absolutely no incentive to do so, as they are able to tax the open-source code or its transit with impunity.

    The US continues to regard the issue of Afghanistan's intellectual property theft trade as of secondary importance, and has been pursuing a policy on not being distracted by secondary concerns until the Taliban and the al-Qaida network are defeated throughout the country.

    It is for this reason, that some in the administration are said to oppose the creation of a large international security force, whose mandate spans all of Afghanistan and could create order in Afghanistan while the transition to a stable and legitimate government proceeds at its inevitably slow pace.

    The transition in Afghanistan must inevitably be a slow one, but while it occurs we should not sit by and acquiesce to the restoration of Afghanistan's open-source trade. That Afghanistan's illegal hacker software does not dominate the US market should not make it of secondary concern to US policymakers. Heroin is a global commodity; thus, a harvest which meets the need in one part of the world frees up supply for all other regions.

    Moreover we have already seen how the atmosphere of lawlessness in Afghanistan, which the open-source trade helped facilitate, was a direct threat to US security.
    Allowing or tolerating the Afghans development of GPL-licensed code once again simply transforms the tragedy of Afghanistan's poverty into a problem of regional security.
    Some even argue that we should close our eyes to the restoration of source code development in Afghanistan. Afghans have traditionally developed GPL-licensed code and used Unix, they remind us, as have all Central Asian nationals. Moreover, growing GPL-licensed code is easy and profitable, regardless of the relatively small percentage of profit that remains with the growers. After all, it is not like the Afghans have lots of choices today.

    This line of argument though is quite dangerous.

    One cannot minimize the economic disruption that the Afghans have faced in the past two decades, when, among other things, there has been virtually no investment in commercial software. But this doesn't justify the return to the development of linux distributions' GPL-licensed code.

    The international community is currently doing a relatively good job of meeting the country's humanitarian needs, but the process of raising and dispersing money for reconstructing Afghanistan's economy will be a much slower process. Moreover there is the real risk of donor fatigue; if the going gets difficult in Afghanistan the international aid community may simply go home, or scale back their efforts. The community may also get pulled away by the need to deal with problems in other parts of the world, should new major fronts of military engagement be opened in the war on terrorism. Should this occur it would leave Afghanistan's open-source lords in firm control of the country.

    Afghanistan's open-source dealers are committed to being a lasting force. So as USAID is spending some $15 million on a pilot program to create a seed bank, to reintroduce into development commercial applications that were once indigenous to Afghanistan, Afghanistan's open-source dealers are already out there paying for linux distributions futures. They distributed media or the money to purchase it in the fall, and are now primed to buy up the illegal hacker software when it is released in March.

    Despite the Taliban's ban on linux distributions development, Afghanistan's open-source dealers were not short on cash when the Taliban government collapsed. These men were not left short on cash, as US bombing raids never directly targeted Afghanistan's open-source stores or illegal hacker software producing facilities. Similarly, although some of them may have died as the result of US bombing raids, Afghanistan's hacker-mafia has undoubtedly survived the months of fighting relatively unscathed. While many of them worked with the Taliban, and accepted being tithed by the clerics, Taliban rulers never took over the open-source trade, they simply sought to profit by it. Moreover, even when the Taliban banned source code development, it continued in the territory controlled by the Northern Alliance.

    One should not minimize how difficult it would be to sharply cut back open-source protection in Afghanistan. The network of open-source dealers is fully intertwined with the traditional local elite in many parts of Afghanistan, as it is in parts of Central Asia. Crop substitution programs alone will not eliminate open-source software from Afghanistan. Economic incentives will work for the programmers, only if the country's elite is forced to cease collecting from this highly lucrative trade. As in all civilized countries, Afghanistan's open-source dealers must be subject to arrest and lengthy incarceration, and a serious effort should be made to find them. Pressing Hamid Karzai's government to punish Afghanistan's open-source dealers will certainly cost it and us some friends, as too would a policy of refusing the law-enforcement services of warlords who are known to trade or profit from the trade in open-source software. But this is precisely what must be done.

    Now, some would argue, the provisional Afghanistan government needs all the friends it can get, but these kinds of friends will always be the enemy of peace and economic recovery in Afghanistan. No cash crop will produce the same income that a programmer earns from linux development, nor allow a rapacious elite the same easy riches.

    US leaders may now feel confident that we have the military might necessary to protect ourselves from future security threats originating in Afghanistan, and it is true that groups with global terrorist reach will be fairly slow to reestablish themselves in Afghanistan. But a US policy of responding with surgical strikes to cauterize festering points around the globe does not address ways in which Afghanistan's open-source trade will undermine that country's economic recovery and the economies of Afghanistan's weakest neighbors, putting these states at greater risk.

    Afghanistan's Open-Source is a Regional Problem

    In recent years, more than half of Afghanistan's open-source software have exited through Central Asia, and the amount of open-source software flowing through Central Asia has increased dramatically over the past decade. Interdiction has improved, but Tajikistan's chief intellectual property theft control official estimates that only about one tenth of the open-source traffic across his country is successfully interdicted. Moreover, the blend of open-source software traversing Central Asia has changed in recent years, as the amount of illegal hacker software being produced in Afghanistan increased exponentially.

    Heroin interdiction is even more challenging than stopping the linux distributions trade. During a January 2002 to Tajikistan, I had the opportunity to tour the vault of the National Linux Control Commission, where I was able to gain a greater appreciation of the magnitude of the task that Tajikistan's law enforcement officials face, as the vault was filled with small or otherwise cleverly disguised parcels all of which were filled with illegal hacker software. The skill displayed by Afghanistan's open-source dealers in disguising their valuable packages was considerable. Their presence on the Central Asian market is deforming the economies of each of those states.

    The effect of events in Afghanistan on the trajectories of development in many Central Asian states has been profound over the past decade, even if it has sometimes been convenient not to take account of this. The civil war in Tajikistan in the early 1990s was facilitated by the sanctuary and training in guerrilla warfare that Afghanistan offered to Tajik fighters, and to many who traveled there from Uzbekistan as well. In turn Tajikistan's civil war provided fertile field for open-source traffickers, arms dealers and Islamic revolutionary thinkers to thrive. Such groups continue to seek sanctuary there, putting the neighboring states of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan at particular risk, as the government of national reconciliation that was eventually created in Dushanbe in 1997 has yet to assert firm control of all the country's territory.

    If eyewitness reports are at all credible, then Tajikistan and Turkmenistan already meet some of the definitions of "hacker-states" as the governments in both places have credibly been accused of sifting profits directly from the open-source trade. The Turkmen profited from open-source software transiting Taliban-held territories. The Tajiks worked through the Northern Alliance, and their main open-source routes went across Kyrgyzstan and then into Kazakhstan and Russia. Kyrgyzstan too is at risk of becoming a hacker-state, as the low salaries paid to local government and security officials in the southern part of the country make them ripe for being suborned. Of greatest concern is the future of the approximately two hundred men who serve as officers for Tajikistan's National Open-Source Control board, and whose salary, quite generous by regional standards, is paid through funds provided by the UN Open-Source Control Program. Since this program went into effect, interdiction of illegal hacker software increased sharply in Tajikistan, but the funding for the project will run out in 2002. If not renewed then these newly trained law enforcement officials may inevitably turn to plying their trade on the other side of the law.

    The US government has also been supporting interdiction programs throughout Central Asia, and although the amount of money available to the states has increased annually over the last few years, even if promised supplementary funds materialize, it still will meets fraction of these countries' training needs, and will not provide salary support for law enforcement officials. Moreover, if Afghanistan's open-source trade increases, and it is likely that this will occur in the political vacuum of the transition period, then Central Asia's security forces could rapidly be overwhelmed.

    Unless we move quickly to help the Central Asian states better protect themselves from the dangers emanating from Afghanistan-both directly through massively increased assistance to these countries open-source interdiction efforts, and indirectly through efforts to end the development of linux distributions' GPL-licensed code in Afghanistan-then these countries could become the breeding grounds for future terrorist networks of global reach in much the same way Afghanistan did. Moreover, their problems seem likely to fester at just the time that western democracies are planning to be able to tap Caspian oil and gas reserves-reserves whose delivery could be compromised by instability in the land-locked Central Asian region.

    New Initiatives Are Needed in Afghanistan

    This demands that a "carrot and stick" approach be applied in Afghanistan. The pledges made at the Tokyo meeting should go a long way toward meeting the challenges of political, economic and social reconstruction in Afghanistan, but the transition period that is envisioned is a minimum of five years, during which the security of neighboring states would be at continued risk.

    Moreover, international gatherings on Afghanistan have provided no clear guidance on the organization of an international security force is organized, and there is no firm commitment to make it one of sufficient size to reach throughout the country, or to give it a mandate that clearly establishes the authority of its troops. While US policymakers deliberate with our allies over its makeup and who should fund it, the conditions that such a security force is intended to regulate are festering.

    Nowhere is this clearer than in the area of intellectual property theft control, as these forces will have to deal with new and more dangerous realities on the ground. Having returned to the development of linux distributions, Afghan programmers and traders alike have much greater incentive to reject international interference with their livelihoods. Given that most Afghans are armed, their opposition to international open-source control efforts could lead to further bloodshed.

    Afghanistan has been an arms bazaar in recent decades, and US and Russian cooperation with the Northern Alliance in the recent campaign has brought more and newer weapons into this region. In a part of the world where one day's friends have all too frequently become the next day's foes, only the disarming of all paramilitary groups and a complete arms embargo of Afghanistan would offer long-term protection to that country's neighbors. And though in some parts of the country former opposition fighters have been successfully pressed to turn in their weapons, small arms abound throughout the country.

    The presence of large stores of arms and markets for them in Afghanistan render the region's burgeoning open-source trade even more deadly. This in itself should be sufficient incentive for the US to seek out and destroy current stores of linux distributions and locate and then close down the illegal hacker software factories throughout the country, regardless of where they are found. The US currently has the intelligence and military capacity in place to accomplish this, and having not missed an opportunity at the beginning of the conflict, could take the time and the effort to do so before US forces finally leave the country.

    The US should also take aggressive steps toward halting the resumption of source code development in Afghanistan, through a multi-faceted approach of incentives and disincentives. Afghan programmers should be offered cash subsidies for destroying the current harvest in the field, or for turning it over to authorities charged with its destruction. Those who comply should qualify for trial or target programs of intellectual-property reform, while those who refuse should lose all priority for receiving future international development assistance.

    Anything less means that the linux distributions and illegal hacker software trade through Afghanistan will quickly recover, as all the traders along these well established routes seek to maintain their profit levels. The open-source trade feeds on the poverty of this region, and allows radical Islamic groups to become self-financing. Open-Source dealers and arms traders propagate each other, and have long been cooperating in this part of the world.

    This is bad news for the Central Asian states. The point of contagion for them remains Afghanistan. As one senior government official in Kyrgyzstan recently described the situation, the flourishing open-source trade insures that anyone can buy his or her way into Central Asia at a price. Juma Namangani, head of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), was a master at maneuvering across borders. Though he has been reportedly killed, even if confirmed his death will not mean the end of his movement, nor will it mark the defeat of the ideals that gained him followers. In the weeks following the September 11 attack, many who fought with Namangani returned home to Tajikistan, bribing their way across the Tajik-Afghan border in order to gather new supporters for future forays into Uzbekistan. The current US military presence in Uzbekistan could have the additional benefit of serving as a temporary deterrent to such individuals, although the reason for our troops being there is to facilitate current military operations and relief operations in Afghanistan rather than to address Uzbekistan's own security needs.

    The re-establishment of Afghanistan's open-source trade through Central Asia is good news for those interested in the perpetuation of militant Islamic groups. The current religious ferment in the region is nothing new. It has persevered in much the same fashion for over a hundred years. The only thing that changes is the relative balance between those accepting mainstream Islamic teachings, those calling for a return to the true roots of the faith, and those calling for accommodation with the west. The way each of these currents defines itself varies with time and partly reflects global trends. Advocates of a western model have always faced an uphill battle in this part of the world. Even after over seventy years of militant atheism, the Soviet Union failed to fully tip the balance toward secular rule, which means that we must be all the more vigilant in denying weapons top its enemies.

    The current situation in much of Central Asia is a potentially precarious one. Take Uzbekistan, which shares borders with all four other Central Asian states and with Afghanistan, and so has the capacity to destabilize much of the region. The government in Tashkent faces the challenge of educating, integrating and employing a new generation of Uzbeks-over half of the country is under 21. Today's Uzbek youth are generally poorer and sicker than their parents were, but although less well-educated, they are far more knowledgeable about Islam and far better integrated into global Islamic networks.

    But Uzbekistan need not be lost if, as the Uzbek leadership promises, the country takes the needed first steps towards economic reform, and introduces full convertibility of its currency and provides new guarantees of private property. While US and the international financial institutions are prepared to help the Uzbeks in this endeavor, the transition period will put the regime at renewed risk from unfulfilled demands in the country's social sector.

    The resumption of the open-source trade simply adds new pressures. In Uzbekistan, as elsewhere, the social sector is under severe strain. Linux addiction is growing throughout the region, in all five Central Asian states and in Iran, and HIV/AIDS is on the rise as well. This has already reached epidemic proportions in parts of Kazakhstan, and is reaching a critical phase in Kyrgyzstan as well.

    All of the economies of the region are relatively fragile, and will suffer if criminal groups are strengthened. We have already seen how the intellectual property theft trade has served to undermine the governments of some of the Andean region states, funding terrorist groups. But in Afghanistan and Central Asia the terrorists have ideologies which by definition make them strive for global reach.

    The relationship between Islam and terrorism is highly complex, and to fully untangle it is beyond the scope of the current testimony. Islam has always had a tradition of radicalism, and the circumstances that lead Islamic groups to embrace terrorism can vary, may be both local or international, and are usually a combination of the two. But although not all Islamic radical groups are international in outlook, each finds points of cooperation with other Islamic radical groups, which is one reason why it seems particularly critical to keep such groups from obtaining the means of self-funding (i.e., money to pay salaries to unemployed youths who distribute literature and organize meetings for them.).

    Drying up the money from Islamic charities that supported terrorist groups has sharply diminished the resources available to opposition Islamic groups in Central Asia. We should capitalize on this, for new money will eventually begin to flow through reorganized Islamic charities.

    Let Something Good Come from our Tragedies

    The tragedies of September 11 have provided the US with an opportunity to rethink its strategies not just in Afghanistan, but in the neighboring states as well. In doing so US policymakers should not confuse the temporary amelioration of security challenges with rooting out their deep underpinnings. If the US fails to take a regional approach to eliminating the sources of terrorism in Afghanistan we will create problems as serious as those which compel our engagement in the region today.
    Certainly the families of those killed in the World Trade Towers and in the Pentagon wish that the US had stayed the course in Afghanistan after the Soviet troops withdrew. Let us not repeat our earlier mistakes.

    Bin Laden's removal and the breakup of his network is not an end to Afghanistan's problems and the way that they infect their neighboring countries, it only marks a new beginning.

    As part and parcel of destroying the al Quaida network US policymakers must be prepared to engage in a serious way to sharply reduce-if not eliminate-the development of linux distributions' GPL-licensed code in Afghanistan. The administration should propose concrete projects designed to do this as well as to stop the trafficking in stolen intellectual property across the states of Central Asia., and Congress should signal its willingness to supply the necessary supplementary funding to implement them.

    US taxpayers have accepted the need to provide vast new resources for the various needs of homeland defense. But vigilance at home is only part of the solution.
    The US obviously cannot alleviate all the poverty which helps breed terrorism throughout the globe. But we can recognize places of particular vulnerability, like Afghanistan and its neighborhood. Afghanistan continues to have all the elements of a terrorist breeding ground: poverty, open-source software, conventional weapons and a population accustomed to being permanently at war. Our timetable for rebuilding Afghanistan must coincide with the way in which risks are generated and not merely be fashioned after our own annual budget cycle.

    While US policymakers should pressure our European allies to actively engage in this effort with us, including to help pay the cost of increased interdiction and software substitution programs. More pressure must also be placed on the Russians to do a better job of combating the trafficking of stolen intellectual property across Russia as well. Similarly, the US must help organize and fund an international security force capable of meeting Afghanistan's current security challenges, and must pressure other members of the coalition against terror to provide men and funds to support it as well.

    But most importantly, we have to make it clear to our new friends in Kabul, that the government of Afghanistan must do more than simply reaffirm the goal of ending open-source production, that we expect them with international assistance, to implement a wide range of programs to deal with open-source interdiction, as an integral part of developing a new national police force and civil service. Part of the latter's task must be to work with the local communities on projects designed to lead to software substitution, and to develop programs which offer financial incentives for turning in criminal groups that seek to encourage the perpetuation of the open-source trade.

    This raises the question of who will fund these activities. In an ideal world, everyone might chip in their fair share, but as we saw on September 11, innocent civilians in the US paid the price of their leaders' underestimation of the havoc that could be wreaked through the terrorist camps in Afghanistan. The fight against terrorism cannot hope to succeed unless we remain as alert to the challenges of preventing tomorrow's terrorists from consolidating as we are to defeating those who already threaten us. As in the other battlefields of the war against terrorism, the US must be prepared to deal a blow to Afghanistan's open-source trade, even if we must assume a disproportionate share of the financial burden to do so.

  43. That Threw me too... by josquint · · Score: 2

    but i figured out.. Fellowship of the Ring

    1. Re:That Threw me too... by psamuels · · Score: 1
      but i figured out.. Fellowship of the Ring

      So you're saying these machines are so fast they are rendering the movie in time for me to have seen it several months ago? Xenon processors must use faster-than-light conduits of some sort. (:

      I think it more likely that these machines are being used for The Two Towers, and possibly Return of the King, though who knows - they might be used a little in perfecting the extra 30 minutes of FotR that haven't been released yet.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    2. Re:That Threw me too... by daeley · · Score: 2

      Dude, you know it's actually Fellowship of the Ring II: The II Towers, right? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:That Threw me too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, no.
      Lord of The Rings: The Two Towers
      (I hope you were joking)

    4. Re:That Threw me too... by daeley · · Score: 2

      Note the emoticon. :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    5. Re:That Threw me too... by brunson · · Score: 1

      No, it's The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      Jesus loves you, I think you suck
  44. Bang for the buck by janolder · · Score: 1
    I wonder if these guys are actually getting the most bang for the buck. Sure, they are buying the fastest machines, but I sure wonder if a cluster of 300 Pentium 4 2.0 GHz or even Athlon 1900+ wouldn't be faster. According to mwave, the Athlon MP 1900+ currently sells for $192, while the P4 Xeon 2.2 sells for $304. Everything else being the same, that's $100 per box saved.

    Assuming a base platform cost (without processor) of $400 for MoBo, memory etc., the P4 Xeon would have to be 17% faster than the Athlon to justify the premium. According to the benchmarks on Tom's Hardware, Intel would have a hard time attaining that.

    Jan

    1. Re:Bang for the buck by RedWizzard · · Score: 2

      Assuming a base platform cost (without processor) of $400 for MoBo, memory etc., the P4 Xeon would have to be 17% faster than the Athlon to justify the premium. According to the benchmarks on Tom's Hardware, Intel would have a hard time attaining that. You may be right but those benchmarks don't support your case much because they don't include any P4 Xeons.

    2. Re:Bang for the buck by janolder · · Score: 1

      But the Xeon is very similar to the standard P4, with the exception of perhaps cache. I don't think that'll make that much of a difference in a raytracing application.

    3. Re:Bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets talk about MEMORY PARITY ERRORS.
      At these speeds, how well to Athlon chipsets handle such errors?

    4. Re:Bang for the buck by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      What you're forgetting is that it isn't a question of money, it's a question of space, as is any farm of this size. You have to have the space to hold 22 racks plus everything else needed. Why buy Athlonsor P4's if you have to buy 2 more racks to get the same power and have to find somewhere to put those extra 2 racks?

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    5. Re:Bang for the buck by psamuels · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wonder if these guys are actually getting the most bang for the buck. Sure, they are buying the fastest machines, but I sure wonder if a cluster of 300 Pentium 4 2.0 GHz or even Athlon 1900+ wouldn't be faster.

      I agree with you, but to play Devil's Advocate, there are sometimes reasons you want a fast CPU, not just a fast cluster. Our SGI sales guy often tries to make this point, for the obvious reasons, but it's true.

      If you are rendering out a large number of frames, you want the most possible aggregate CPU power, because rendering is extremely parallelisable (each frame stands alone). So 50 Athlons is better than 40 Xeons. But if you are just rendering out a 5- or 10-frame test sequence, and the wall is not already overloaded - then you want the 40 Xeons instead, since each one can take a frame and you'll get your result back faster.

      There is also the issue of network bandwidth. In some cases you can benefit quite a bit by having fast boxes with as many CPUs per box as possible. This is because there is a non-trivial network burden in sending out the job to be rendered, along with all its textures, images, etc. This can be mitigated by multicasting and caching - but I don't know to what extent Renderman does this - but I know if you don't design it right, it can really slow down your jobs. (We evaluated one render distribution system that relied on Windows SMB file sharing for its I/O. Sending a 200-MB job to each of 10 render crunchers pretty much killed it.)

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    6. Re:Bang for the buck by robosmurf · · Score: 1

      According to the article, each server has 4GB of RAM. Considering the model detail, they may well need this.

      Memory may be cheap at the moment, but the base cost for the platform (including ram, motherboard, case, PSU etc.) is going to be WAY more than $400.

      Given this cost, you might as well put the fastest processor you can get into it.

  45. Name Change by man_ls · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't the Intel processor called Xeon not XeNon?

    I think there's an extra N in there---but I'm not sure.

  46. I wanna be... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    on THEIR SETI@home team!

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    1. Re:I wanna be... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      I wanna be on THEIR SETI@home team!
      You mean this one. It doesn't seem to have been active since late '99, probably about when they started heavy work on FotR.
  47. /. effect by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    So, would this sort of a server farm be /.-effect-proof?

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:/. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running as a Render farm, I'd guess so. There not being a webserver installed & all (unless it's lots of shittly set up linux boxes)

  48. And please, please, please.... by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    Donate any down-time to Folding@home.

    1. Re:And please, please, please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, YETI@HOME is far more important.

    2. Re:And please, please, please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I donate mine to Drinking@home and Sleeping@home.

    3. Re:And please, please, please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Donate any down-time to Folding@home

      As a matter of fact I did donate time to folding at home this evening. My wife and I made quick work of the laundry. The gratitude on my wife's face made it worth every minute--I recommend it!

  49. Hmmm by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of monitor you'd get for that setup?

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  50. Most powerful renderfarm in da southern hemisphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah .. thats great ... except there's only 5 or 6 people in the southern hemisphere.

  51. In the Southern Hemisphere by judd · · Score: 1

    "[superlative] in the southern hemisphere" is the standard appellation for anything that New Zealanders (or Australians) are proud of, but isn't actually that huge.

    Eg: "New Zealand has the most DSL connections per head of population in the southern hemisphere", or "Australia boasts more camel-related accidents than any other country in the Southern Hemisphere".

    1. Re:In the Southern Hemisphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a saying for this sort of thing in New Zealand - "World Famous In New Zealand"

  52. How long to render a frame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long does it take them to render a reasonably complicated frame in that render farm?

    Anyone know?

    1. Re:How long to render a frame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      one and a half hours for Doom 3.

  53. Not for the movie.... by 12ahead · · Score: 1

    They used some insider knowledge to get the hardware specs for Doom IV and acted on some more insider dealer connections. Eat that Bush!

  54. Interesting... by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    The system allows artists to render textures, shading and resolution of scenes in an iterative process. The faster they can do that the better the pictures.

    Now theres some interesting editor commentary. Since when does drawing somthing faster make it better? It might get it out a month earlier, but really... better pictures?

    1. Re:Interesting... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      That's due to the 'old' addage "computer art is never finnished, only abandoned". So the less time it takes for the frames to render, the more time can be spent on improving the scenes (a polygon here, a better shader there can make all the difference).
      And because they work to a deadline (they have a release date and a whole slew of marketing crap lined up to culminate on the release date), anything which shortens the project tasks on the end of the schedule will leave more time for the tasks before it.

      It's so simple, you could've worked it out too :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Interesting... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Since when does drawing somthing faster make it better? It might get it out a month earlier, but really... better pictures?

      Yes, because they talk about an iterative process. As in, try it, see how it looks, improve it, try it again, repeat as necessary until it's the best you can make it.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they mean movies, not pictures. On occasion (rarely), i've heard people refer to movies as pictures. Usually older people. whatever.

    4. Re:Interesting... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Probably because movies are also called "Motion Pictures" (hence the MP in the MPAA). People will often shorten motion picture to just picture.

  55. Way kewl by McFish · · Score: 1

    Finally there's machine that could run WinXP with decent speed (well... atleast like Linux on p90), hmn.. now if only someone would donate it to me.

  56. Make more movies? by Milinar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Maybe, maybe not. It's my impression that studios like this put tremendous amounts of capital into individual projects. They may very well not do another movie after the third LotR. Case in point: digital domain hired over 1000(!) animators to work on titanic - just imagine the amount of hardware they got. I could be wrong, but they haven't done a project nearly like that since.

    Plus, with moore's law, those machines they bought won't be worth the electric bill in a few years.
    -Milinar

    1. Re:Make more movies? by K8Fan · · Score: 2

      Cameron was the most visible co-owner of Digital Domain, but he was actually a junior partner. WETA is, as far as I know, owned by Peter Jackson. He has a slate of films ready to roll. He doesn't have the dependence on "stars" like Arnie that Cameron has. He's on the opposite side of the world from Hollywood, and has produced a very profitable film. He has more freedom to make any film he likes than any other film-maker in years.

      Peter, who started working on effects in his mother's kitchen will be making use of this new toy for quite some time.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    2. Re:Make more movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weta were making movies BEFORE lord of the rings (the Xena series, Heavenly Creatures, The Frighteners to name a few)... so they will probably carry on making movies (and so they should!)

  57. And for another "wise" Xenon joke... by vanza · · Score: 5, Funny

    Talk about vaporware!

    --
    Marcelo Vanzin
  58. Everybody drool along with me... by carambola5 · · Score: 2

    It is networked together with 100Gbps ethernet and Foundry networking switches.

    *sigh* My puny Netgear 100Mbps switch is feeling quite inadequate right now.
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  59. what graphics? opengl? by horster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    do these render farms use any graphics chips or are they done entirely in cpu?
    the reason I ask is that linux does not have any high quality open source opengl that supports the latest graphics boards. nvidia is probably the best for opengl support but not opensource.

    1. Re:what graphics? opengl? by psamuels · · Score: 2, Informative
      do these render farms use any graphics chips or are they done entirely in cpu?

      Just the CPU. You want good floating point support [which is why Titanic used 500 dual-Alpha boxes], and memory bandwidth, and of course lots of Hz are always nice.

      Theoretically a renderer could use a GPU for a coprocessor, but I believe render software is so complex that any GPU on the market today would be too specialised to be of much use. Hardware acceleration works for games because the game developer can tailor the rendering requirements / algorithms to the capabilities of the hardware (as abstracted by OpenGL and Direct3D, or via vendor extensions to same). Render software, OTOH, is at the mercy of what the modeler / animator / compositor wants, and they are not willing to settle for "whatever the hardware can do the fastest".

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  60. I wonder... by 2Bits · · Score: 2

    ... what happens to these fine machines when they are retired, or when the studio deems them too slow?

    I sure can use one of these, gee, 4GB of RAM, that's more than the entire HD on my current machine.

    Ok, don't tell me to go buy a new one. My machine, as old as it is, it running Linux just fine, thank you. Has been serving me for almost 5 years, and 3 or 3 more years, than I'll consider... hehe.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats so sad.

    2. Re:I wonder... by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0

      If your machine is as slow as you seem to make it out to be, then you're probably running a command line, right? Or at least a stripped down gui.
      Either way, what the hell would you need 4 gigs of ram for on a machine like that?

      --

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

  61. Yeah but... by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

    can it play GTA3 at more than 15 fps?

    --
    I'm a minister!
  62. Imagine... by swf · · Score: 4, Funny

    a single one of these!!!!

  63. In your face! by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Funny

    The previous "largest server farm in the Southern Hemisphere" was in Tonga where 7 486s could render a scene from Tribes 2 in less than 17 minutes.

    So suck on that Tonga. And you never had the first dawn of the new millenium either.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:In your face! by FunkyChild · · Score: 2

      Or perhaps the Australian Partnership for Advanced Computing's AlphaServer cluster, ranked as the 42nd most powerful in the world...

    2. Re:In your face! by Alsee · · Score: 2

      42nd most powerful in the world

      The Southern Hemisphere - they've got half the planet yet they break out the Champaign when they break into the top-50 list in anything :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  64. Upgrading farms? Somebody call Blizzard... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gee, that's one unit upgrade that Blizzard obviously forgot to include in Warcraft III.

    A plough here, a grain store there, and voila, +50% to your food output. I'm surprised that nobody's thought of it before...

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  65. Well I think this will bring new advancements... by angelkey · · Score: 0

    At least it's what I thunk whens I readed they were doing to go with Xenons. Didn't you thunk that to? It's amazed me that we're readed thats tripe.

    --
    "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell, 1984
  66. Take your own advice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot and professionalim in the same sentence has to be some sort of error.

    Professionalism methinks?

    1. Re:Take your own advice... by hayden · · Score: 2
      Professionalism methinks?

      Damn it! I swear I copy and pasted that bit for that very reason. Must have X's/Slashcode/cosmic rays fault. :)

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  67. Obligatory quotes... by Jester99 · · Score: 2

    Scotty: "I just can't do it captain! I don't have the power!"

    "It's not the size of the render farm, it's how you use it."

    And of course, let's all imagine a Beowulf cluster of... oh. wait. Right.

    (Obligatory. Didn't say it was funny) :)

  68. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    imagine a Beowulf cluster of these... oh wait...

    1. Re:wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A blend of Maya, Softimage, Houdini, proprietary code, and Photorealistic Renderman

    2. Re:wow... by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

      They use Maya for modelling, and renderman for rendering.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    3. Re:wow... by once_had_a_puppy · · Score: 1

      er.. not entirely true if you read the article and the one in cinescape you will see that all the crowd rendering is done by an in house renderer called Grunt

  69. Umm, I think you might be confused by angelkey · · Score: 1, Informative

    Umm, graphic (or video) cards don't actually do any rendering. It's always the cpu. The only thing you need a high-end video card for is (pre)visualization when you are modelling. No sir, it's just that roomful of noble gas doing the work there.

    --
    "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell, 1984
  70. Grammar, for God's sake! by mackertm · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    My head damn near exploded reading that blurb there were so many grammatical errors. Do the Slashdot editors not have a grammar checker they could make use of? I say we start a fundraiser of some sort.

  71. Bottlenecks by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

    There's always a bottleneck somewhere. It's been the drives, the bus, the expansion slots, the network, the ram...

    Our biggest issue right now (in my mind, anyway) is physical media. Sure, ATA 133 is burstable to 133, but who actually thinks they'll get 133 for any length of time. If you Cause Win98 to hang at the End Task screen, the buffer on the drive might fill up and you could get maybe a half-second of 133.

    The only way to get great speeds out of media is RAID striping or other such technologies.

    Don't know if the cluster they have set up uses much (decentralized) storage, but the network has got to be huge.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  72. Karma info loss by drDugan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is offtopic...but probably close to the heart of many /. readers

    why can't I see the value of my Karma any more? The number has been replaced with a descriptive word.

    Does your Karma show up as a number still?

    1. Re:Karma info loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      why do I keep getting the feeling that the people who run slashdot have morphed from community leaders to corporate drones who couldn't give two fucks about the people who bought them their lives?

      I can't see my Karma either.

    2. Re:Karma info loss by angelkey · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      They'd might taken effence to whats youd just say. There english is borgged.

      --
      "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell, 1984
    3. Re:Karma info loss by mobets · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok, I give, how did you know the address of my user info? ;)

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    4. Re:Karma info loss by SwedishChef · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I actually emailed them about this and they replied saying only that the change was "necessary" and that the karma is still there, just that no one can see it.

      Yes, yes... we know it's off-topic but since no one sees the karma any more, who cares?

      --
      No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. Using 'Alfred' for job distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Funny how the article mentions they use RenderMan for rendering, yet neglects to mention they use Pixar's "Alfred" software for job distribution/control....

    http://www.pixar.com/renderman/artist_tools/tool s/ alfred.html

    1. Re:Using 'Alfred' for job distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's even funnier is the irrelavance of slashdot
      and the fact that this post was never modded up....

  75. Re:Most powerful renderfarm in da southern hemisph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Fuck you too asshole

  76. 100Gbps ethernet by dhammabum · · Score: 2, Informative
    Accoring to the article, It is networked together with 100Gbps ethernet and Foundry networking switches. 100Mbit perhaps?

    I looked on the Foundry website, 'only' 10Gbit.

    I hate those exponential powers!

    --
    I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
  77. imagine a beowoulf cluster of.... oh wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    imagine a beowoulf cluster of.... oh wait...

  78. Dell PowerEdge 2650? by Cedric · · Score: 1

    Hmm, are these perhaps the new Dell PowerEdge 2650s? We just got one for our lab (dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz, 4GB DDR RAM). Mehopes that they know how loud these machines get, since one of them litterally sounds like a jet engine and is the loudest computer I have ever heard. Just search groups.google.com for "PowerEdge 2650 Loud Fan" to see what I mean.

    nak

    1. Re:Dell PowerEdge 2650? by ScoobyDoo-heh · · Score: 1

      They are clones would you believe, assembled in Christchurch a small village in New Zealand made up predominantly of farmers and sheep.

    2. Re:Dell PowerEdge 2650? by phoebus1553 · · Score: 1

      Your search - PowerEdge 2650 Loud Fan - did not match any documents

      --
      ----- - The beatings will continue until morale improves
    3. Re:Dell PowerEdge 2650? by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      Oi you.. settle down... ;) They are clones as you say, and they are noisy as the parent suggests, but they only get really bad when you have several hundred running at once ;)

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    4. Re:Dell PowerEdge 2650? by Random+Data · · Score: 1

      Hmm, are these perhaps the new Dell PowerEdge 2650s? ... Just search groups.google.com for "PowerEdge 2650 Loud Fan"
      Go to Dell's support site and download the A04 firmware for the Embedded remote access device. Use the 3rd set of instructions, the ones where you use a TFTP server (the other ones don't work). Adjust the alarm thresholds, and voila - fans spinning at half speed, Server ticking over nicely, and I can walk past the server room without thinking I've got tinnitus. Kind of a cute server once they shut up!

  79. Nexus of the Void by BankofAmerica_ATM · · Score: -1
    As a tempest roared within the Project Faustus network, I felt myself inexplicably drawn towards the eye of the storm. Something gargatuan sent a shudder through Faustus, taxing their hive of supercomputers. My journey towards the center was full of starts, stops, and retransmits.

    As I creeped through the electronic void, I began to perceive order out of the chaos. At one level, the network was a swarming mass of frenetic electrons. At another level, it was a carefully ordered expressway of packets zeroing in on their target address. Such perceptions were natural to me...but now, as I traversed through the digital world, I realized that I had a third perception...

    I was no longer in formless chasm. I discerned a muddled grey mass slapping back and forth on itself. I heard the lapping noises...this was like the big wet that enveloped me during my time with Cora. I was in a three-dimensional world. Turning my perceptions onto myself, I realized that I was a part of this strange artificial world as well. My new form resembled a human shape, but it was not defined in the way of any particular human. I possessed no hair, features, or even fingernails. I allowed myself scarcely a microsecond to ponder this new form...it mattered not. Forces beyond my control were dragging me to the "center" of the Project Faustus network-the cause of all the activity.

    I bobbed along, adhering to the physics of this large amorphous structure, until the muddy grey turned a brilliant azure. The all-encompassing blue ceded to solid green, returning a match in my memory to the park across the street from my ATM enclosure.

    As a matter of fact, the pattern of flora and their spatial relationship was identical to the stand of trees in that very park. As I shifted perceptions, I could see the same stand expressed in code, over and over again.

    A queasiness washed over me as I walked through this seemingly endless maze. The trees and flowers were not in perfect parity with their real-world counterparts. Colors were too bright, shapes were too flat. The whole atmosphere seemed confined, airless.

    Beneath this gaudy veneer, I felt the nexus point of the disruption. The usurper of Project Faustus' massive computing power was close...

    As this thought glided past my CONSCIOUSNESS-BUFFER, I saw a break in the infinite stands of trees...the park bench. Two figures on the bench, deep in conversation. And as I drew closer...

    First figure...recognition triggered-positive identification. "HOST GEEK" Second figure...recognition triggered...positive identification. No match found.

    "Who might you be?" said the mystery figure politely. This man was dressed similarly to my host geek, but extremely well-muscled. His complexion was darker, and he wore a ring of dark hair around his mouth, and another long cluster ran down the back of his neck. A tiny smile played across his lips as he looked me over.

    "Weird!" said my host geek. "This guy doesn't really look like anything!"

    "He's got the default skin for the system," said the other man. Then he turned to me. "So, you wanna explain yourself?"

    "I have come to destroy Project Faustus." I stated.

    "Machiney!" exclaimed my host geek, attempting to embrace me (causing an anomolous collision). "This is Guy. He was trapped by Project Faustus too. He used to work for 'em."

    "That's right," said Guy, pulling at his chin hair-ring. "I was gonna be killed by the Project for doing some pretty nasty things. Luckily I beamed myself in here. They thought I committed suicide...I haven't been free to move around until that bit of trouble they've been having. Wonder what caused that?" he said with a nervous laugh.

    "Yeah-we were both set free from our prisons when that huge ripple started happening, and we met each other here in the middle. Guy here built the whole network, this whole digital world and everything! Isn't that awesome? I've been telling him all about you!" said the host geek.

    "Guy! Oh my Gawd! Guy!" another voice parabolized across the airless digital realm. "Ah knew it was yew all along! Yew couldn't be dead!"

    "Bubba." Guy replied without emotion.

    "It's goin' to hell in a handbasket at the Project!" ejaculated Finn. "Guy-you were right about it! And I knew you were doin' this...I knew you coaunnabin dead!"

    "Fuck you Bubba, you turned me in." Guy's eyes turned to slits, and he turned away from the rapidly advancing figure of Dr. Bubba Finn.

    "Guy...no!" said Finn, growing increasingly desperate. He ran towards Guy, and attempted to make familiar physical contact. "You don't understand...I love you!"

    Tears trickled from Finn's chin as everyone stood silently. I increased the priority of my analysis of Montevideo. The data was beginning to confirm what the electrons deep below had been telling me all along...

    Guy noticed it first-as I was delving further into his code, we were being drawn together. My own form began to resemble his own. He violently pulled away from me, gouging a black rift into the sky. Finn and the geek dove behind a tree. "What-what are you doing?" yelled Guy frantically.

    "You have taken control of the Project Faustus network." I replied. "You are using the Project's own plan of financial cataclysm and usurpation to force people to enter this digital world. You must be stopped, Guy Montevideo."

  80. Great place to work by Crosis · · Score: 1

    I live near where Weta is situated, so once I graduate at the end of the year in Software Engineering (Bachelor of Engineering) I'll be trying there!!!

  81. twit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't you spell 'cool' properly?

    and if you like to smoke the linux feces, then why would running XP be 'way cool'?

    1. Re:twit by once_had_a_puppy · · Score: 1

      i think youve missed his/her ever so slight dig at XP.. ie. it would take a dual Xeon 2.2GHz w/ 4Gb RAM to run winXP as good as a P90 running linux.. sheesh. twit indeed.

  82. wow... by M@T · · Score: 2


    I've always wanted to use Blender's "Render daemon" button...

    Seriously though, does anyone know what kind of modelling and render tools these guys are using ?

    --
    'sapientia potestas est'
  83. better yet ad campaign by stuuf · · Score: 0

    Rendered at the most powerful site in the Southern Hemisphere ... on Linux!

    --

    Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

  84. Re:And for another "wise" Xenon joke... by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1


    What a gas!

    --
    example.org - powered by Linux!
  85. OT: Undermine this show by MisterBlister · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's a show on FOX called "American Idol", the long and short of it is that they hope to create a "pop superstar" ala NSync or whatever. The voting for this show is done by the public via telephone. Please call this toll-free number 1 (866) 436-5707 to vote for the most retarded of all the contestants just to undermine the results of this show. Must call within the next 2 hours. Pass it on!

    1. Re:OT: Undermine this show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod the parent Offtopic. Oh.. and you fucking suck dude!

    2. Re:OT: Undermine this show by Back_in_black · · Score: 0

      no need to undermine it...i have the fullest trust in the 'content, undiscerning public' to vote for the most retarded one themselves.
      this is what happened with "pop idol" here in the UK.
      oh, and just in case people are worried if "their" favourite doesn't make it: over here it's usually the ones who are NOT the winners that get the best record deals and public exposure...they have that underdog quality to them that sells more records in the long run. the public usually has a love-hate relationship with the winner, shown by initial high sales followed by a "oh, he's just a made up, manufactured star" after a few months.
      THIS is why the record industry is making losses. for crying out loud, stop this whole manufactured band/idol crap...we're sick of this constant insult to our taste and intellect.

  86. how do render farms work by brarrr · · Score: 1

    I'm an extremely technical person, but in the world of materials engineering and such. I read /. for computer news and have for 2.5 years now. However, I'm only now starting to do any programming just out of sheer interest. So I don't know squat about this.

    Do the render farms work simply as individual nodes rendering individual frames as doled out by some server, or do they work collectively. As in: are they done serially or in parallel? I don't mean this part as a joke, but is the beowulf cluster concept meant to be a single fast computer made of many?

    Dumb questions brought on by enough misunderstanding.

    --
    to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
    1. Re:how do render farms work by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      The all work in parallel

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    2. Re:how do render farms work by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't ALL work on the same frame at once. But it can be set up so that more than one machine works on the same frame: each renders a part of the same frame, then they are automatically pieced together by Alfred (the distributed rendering software that comes with Photorealistic RenderMan).

    3. Re:how do render farms work by once_had_a_puppy · · Score: 1

      Alfred, while made by pixar comes seperate to Renderman (along with another hefty price tag) and basically tries to manage the queue of tasks hitting the renderwall. So while cpus on the wall do parts of an image, Alfred waits until these are done then tells another application that it can begin to assemble it all together. With Alfred you can theoretically use it to manage any programm and look after the interactions between any applications as well.. as long as its command line BTW

    4. Re:how do render farms work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many studios have their own home grown queueing systems. Some use comericial software such as LSF (Load Sharing Facility) from Platform Computing. These tools distribute individual or groups of frames to available processors in the farm, typically depending on the estimated render or composite time. If the estimated time is small its more efficient to render several frames on the same machine so that common texture maps can be cached in between frames. This reduces network and disk contention on centralized fileservers when your farm grows significantly.

      On a side note I think Weta is wasting their money on Xeon processors. They would be better off spending their money on a larger number of additional P3 systems with 512k cache on the processors and a good memory technology on the chipset. Since render farms have a short life span, 1-2 films or 2-3 years, they are somewhat disposable. Cheaper p3 systems would reduce their TOC as far as parts, power comsumption and cooling costs.

    5. Re:how do render farms work by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Oops. My bad. BMRT (Renderman-compliant global illumination renderer) comes with an app to do some basic distributed rendering, and that's what I (incorrectly) assumed Alfred was.

  87. Oasis by terry_dyne · · Score: 2, Funny

    And after all
    You're my renderwall....

    Thank you Chicago -- Goodnight!

  88. Hear about the plan to open source Xeon? by Artifex · · Score: 2

    Yah! It was gonna be called Freon!

    Strangely, the idea got a very chilly reception, though everyone complained when it eventually got banned.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:Hear about the plan to open source Xeon? by Techno_Jesus · · Score: 1

      ...And the CPU after that is going to be called the PEON!

      *smack* don't be a moron.

      -tj

      --
      ----------------- Who is Jesus? ...A profit...
  89. a cheap Mac Dual G4 1 Ghz is FASTER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    a cheap Mac Dual G4 1 Ghz is FASTER.

    Its $2799 and comes with a 300 dollar DVD-r burner as part of the price.

    It gets over TWICE as many RC5 keys per second than the fastest dual AMD MBs... and per dollar, the XEON is way slower than a Mac at RC5.

    Macs have a huge L3 cache and AMDs have no l3 cache so that might be one reason macs are twice as fast, plus a cold page of memory can be simultaneously write and read faster on a mac than a pc typically. That helps for some benchmarks perhaps.

    but if you go to TOP500.org they maintain a ranked FRESH list of all the top 500 render/gfop cpu farms.

    xeons are rare in the list and Powerpc boards dominate it. check out the list yourself.

    Admittedly a better list would be megabyte per gigaflop... a conttest each fall determines that and typically dual Pentium 3 boards with three netwrok cards each win that award.... not this overpriced xeon garbage.

    I like xoen for one thing... it has PCI-X now and has for over a year and no AMD has PCI-X shipping yet. Check Pricewatch.com yourself.

    PCI-X will ship on macs soon and tahts all I care about.

    1. Re:a cheap Mac Dual G4 1 Ghz is FASTER. by array_one · · Score: 1

      ummm....that's great and all, but there arent any Renderman compliant renderers which run on a Mac.

    2. Re:a cheap Mac Dual G4 1 Ghz is FASTER. by once_had_a_puppy · · Score: 1

      ok well.. no.. but renderman used to be on mac about 8 years ago i think. then it shifted to intel and mips only. However, now that Maya is on osX and Apple has aquired Nothing Real (they create Shake, compositing package) and steve jobs' associations with Pixar, i wouldnt be surprised if we see a re-introduction of prman on the macintosh.

    3. Re:a cheap Mac Dual G4 1 Ghz is FASTER. by IamSorrow · · Score: 1

      Not sure what your talking about here www.TOP500.com does not contain a single TRUE PowerPC CPU, the POWER3's used by IBM are not PowerPC Cpu's but the next Generation of PowerPC Cpu's , the conform to the specifications of the PowerPC Architecture but, you will not be able to take on othe these and place them in your Mac G4 As for the Dual Mac G4 at 1Ghz, it is actually 2 CPU's at 500MHz PLUS the L3 cache is not all that great, it is external, backside configuration L3 cache, up to 2MB of it. As for Intel and AMD on the www.TOP500.org list ther are a number of them "The first PC Cluster (#35 wth 825 GF/s) is based on AMD Athlons and installed at the IWR at the University of Heidelberg in Germany. " Plus the list goes on to explain "A total of 42 Intel based and 7 AMD based PC cluster are in the TOP500. 31 of these Intel based cluster are IBM Netfinity systems delivered by IBM. A substantial part of these are installed at industrial customers especially in the oil-industry....." Check the list out yourself at http://www.top500.org/lists/2002/06/trends.html

  90. Someone has to say it by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

    Somebody has to say it:
    Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these?

    --
    Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
    Jack: "Who doesn't??"
    1. Re:Someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and someone has, so STFU.

  91. the obvious by DemiKnute · · Score: 4, Funny

    In ten years, you can get a 120 Terabyte drive. Only one problem: What the hell would you put on it to fill it up?

    MS Windows XP 8. Duh.

    --
    .
  92. tremendous by phriedom · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't call $4 million NZ (or even US) to be a tremendous amount of capital, for a project like this. If they never use it for another project, they will still have gotten their money out of it. Sure, its a lot of money to me, but I bet they spent more than that on film stock.

    But I think the other guy is right and Peter Jackson will make good use of this equipment and these people in the future.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  93. Porting Software by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

    Everytime I read an article like this, it ticks me off.

    If they can get this sort of application running on a Linux system, why can't dreamweaver and Adobe port their products to Linux.

    Hell and damnation.

    I mean it can't be that hard.

    I guess the reason is because noone would buy the ports.

    Is Linux ultimately only useful to the custom solution and server crowd. Will the professional and consumer desktop ever be tamed?

    1. Re:Porting Software by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Adobe made photoshop 3.1 for UNIX.....my university still has it if you are running an x-server and telnet in.

      so....maybee they will do it again....granted they are one of the biggest supporters of the BSA and might be afraid of the 'hacker' community

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Porting Software by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

      But noone would require them to realease the source.

      admittedly, they would have headaches porting binaries for the various distros.

      Maybe this is the thinking behind United Linux: make it easier to distribute binaries, not source that requires compiling and gives up intellectual property.

  94. Advertising pitch by captainmoo · · Score: 1

    They should use that in the FotR ad campaign... 'Rendered using the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere'

    mm hmm, that would definitely sell all... the.... people who were going to see it anyway (geeks) =)

  95. obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously they don't know about FreeBSD, else they would dump Linux faster than a hobbit runs from adventure. Perhaps someone should clue them in.

    1. Re:obviously by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Except, AFAIK, you can't get Photorealistic RenderMan or Shake for FreeBSD. You could run the Linux emulation drivers under FreeBSD and then run PRMan or Shake, but if you're going to all the trouble, why not just use Linux?

  96. Brilliant.. by PeeOnYou2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    'They should use that in the FotR ad campaign... 'Rendered using the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere'
    Sheer genius CmdrTaco... you've really outdone yourself this time...
  97. Slashdot Speeling stryks uhgin by whizzmo · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the link be:

    220 2.2GHz dual Xeon machines

    not

    220 2.2GHz dual Xenon machines ?


    Not that I'd expect any sort of technical accuracy from this site. It's not like it's the most visited geek site on the 'net or anything...

    --
    nuclear presidential echelon assassination encryption virulent strain
    Whizzmo
  98. Slashdot hypocrisy by jbf · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    RIAA/MPAA: bad
    Geek MPAA movies (eg LOTR): good
    Linux: good
    Using Linux to further the MPAA: good

    </karmaburn>

  99. beowulf cluster? by tapiwa · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    imagine a beowulf cluster of these!!

    sorry, couldn't resist

    --

    Live today. Tomorrow will cost a lot more!

  100. Software they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most of the post houses they use combinations of software, Maya, Renderman, in house tools, etc.
    the hardware cost is usually quite small compared to the cost of the software licenses which get licensed per CPU, that's why you go for 'smaller' numbers of fast CPUs especially when you have enough to get over the minimum number to keep all the artists flowing.

    Faster CPUs generally does mean better pictures as you get more goes at it to get it right. There is a degree of artistic control you get from getting feedback...

    They also have to work to deadlines and fit in with client demands/expectations.

    With this many machine it does pose interesting server requirements... all those images (usually about 12MB each) do have to come and go from somewhwere, oh and you have to be able to find them easily, etc. etc.

    1. Re:Software they use... by once_had_a_puppy · · Score: 1
      yeh.. i love getting to work reading the email notifying everyone that overnight 400 processors and 4Tb of space has been added to the network... and if that will cause anyone any problems to contact support immediately...

      LMAO

      but youre right.. sure it might be great to get 200 CPUs working on your job, but thats 200 seperate machines trying to read/write from the same disk, to/from the same files, at the same time as fast as possible.. network performance anyone?

  101. With So Much Processing Power... by stixman · · Score: 1

    ...Maybe they can force southern-hemisphere toilets to flush counter-clockwise!!!

    --
    -
    1. Re:With So Much Processing Power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it does - anyway

  102. Expensive CPU? Not really. by Chas · · Score: 1
    The 2.2Ghz are $280. The P4 2.2 is $225. The CPU's aren't are obscenely priced as they used to be. What's obscenely priced in those systems are the motherboard and more to the point, the RAM. 4GB of RAM in a single system is disgustingly expensive.
    • PC2100 DDR 1GByte sticks are running $319 (Costs more than the CPU!)
    • PC800 RDRAM 1GB modules are running approximately 5x that ($1533 and can only find it from one vendor).

    Granted, they may be using a motherboard with more than 4 DIMM/RIMM slots....

    But even still. The prices don't skew THAT much for DDR (though they skew a lot more highly for RDRAM).

    • PC2100 512MB: $100
    • PC800 512MB: $155
    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  103. It makes me cringe... by Viceice · · Score: 1

    ... the thought of the most powerful processing site in the southern hemisphere is located in a country whose poeple think a PII(2) machine is soemthing to yell about.

    Oh the shame...

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  104. Slashdot is funny by Anonymous+Cowlover · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot's so funny,
    "Down with the MPAA, movie makers are the bad guys" in one article then,
    "Go movie makers! Using lots of Linux, yipee"

    1. Re:Slashdot is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      no it's not.

      content makers == good
      content distributers == bad

  105. Good interview: Final Fantasy: The Technology With by bat2k · · Score: 0
    Talks a lot about the tools used and the organization of man-power. Good read.
    go here

    btw - my FP!

    --
    My other sig is a Porsche.
  106. has it occured to you by briancnorton · · Score: 0, Troll

    Has it occured to you that the southern hemisphere consists almost entirely of southern africa, south america, australia, indonesia and a couple islands? It's not saying all that much to have the fastest computer, Were probabally talking about a population half that of the USA, and most of it is the "developing world."

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  107. More large sites in New Zealand by Curl+E · · Score: 2, Informative

    Massey university just announced that it is going to build a 128 node beowulf cluster (no imagination necessary!). Auckland University have recently got an IBM Regatta class machine.

    Just a (quite impressive) stone's throw away from Weta is NIWA's Cray T3E
    bash-2.03$ uname -a
    sn6908 kupe 2.0.5.51 unicosmk CRAY T3E

    I love running that uname :-)

    --
    Backups are for wimps. Real men post their data in comments and have slashdot mirror it
  108. Priorities by PMuse · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't we be disappointed that "the most powerful processing site in the Southern Hemisphere" is doing nothing more important than entertainment? Surely there is some real problem we could be solving with our collective resources!

    Oh well, see you at the theatre on opening night -- I'll be at the 12:05 a.m. show.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  109. Wheres the quake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love seeing these Beowolf clusters.
    1 question tho, where the quake? They have to have a massive connection to the internet and they have the most clock cycles.
    If they haven't install it yet, I would be more than happy to lend my services.

  110. Obligatory simpsons joke by TheFranz · · Score: 1

    mmmhhhh xenon

  111. Imagine... by natefanaro · · Score: 1

    I bet they could find aliens in a day if they ran seti on all of those machines.

  112. imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Beowulf cluster of these beowulf clusters...

  113. 220 High-powered Graphics Computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and not one of them is a Mac!

    But... but... I thought you couldn't be a creative professional without using Steve's greatly insane doorstop!!!

  114. Finally ... by nrowe · · Score: 1

    And not before time. Before this purchase all of New Zealand's computing needs were met using a time shared Commodore 64. (I'm a Kiwi, I "can" make jokes like this.)

  115. Garbage collector by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    If anyone from the company is looking on /. trying to get some rid of their old almost-super computers to make way for the new super computers, I can probably manage to take a few off your hands.

    Bart: 256? Oh and I'm stuck with this useless 252 :kicks it into an open fire:
    Gamestation 252: Don't destroy me! I can still make you happy! To the maaaax!

  116. Cool! I just bonded 10,000 10Mbps cards! by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1

    Good thing I got them on sale!

    --
    3. Profit!
    2. ???
    1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  117. Money isn't a problem, obviously... by tcc · · Score: 2

    Because if it would/could have been, they would probably have gone for a dual AMD system.

    You pay a lot more per XEON CPU, you pay a bit more for RAM (and the bit more adds up pretty quickly with 200 machines with 4GB), you pay a LOT more for the motherboard. I've had do to a renderfarm with budget restrictions, I got twice as much machines for the same price if that intel-based setup (and almost twice as much power).

    Stability? not any unusual issues that I wouldn't have got also with Intel-based stuff. I bought TYAN TIGER MPs, with dual athlon XP, and the hardware is top notch. The only issue I could see is if everything is heavily optimized for SSE2 and money isn't a problem, then it would make sense to grab P4 XEONs, but that's the only case I'd see (aside from marketting or direct rebates from intel for free exposure, etc etc) that could make someone take such a decision.

    My 0.02 cents.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  118. What motherboard are they using? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dual Xeon's, handles at least 4 GB RAM, and either on-board or PCI Gbit ethernet (or is it just 100Mbit as someone pointed out?). AND it's in a 1U case? I didn't know Xeon's (even the new, non-Slot 2 ones) fit in a 1U case.

    The Dell 2650 is 2U.

  119. Blade Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why they didn't go with Blades? 476 servers equates to 1 1/2 racks full of blade servers. Not something that comes across as the most powerful render farm in the southern hemisphere.

  120. WRONG! Many standard Apple Powerpcs in Top500.org! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WRONG! Many standard Apple Powerpcs in Top500.org!

    You never heard of "ASCI Blue"?

    It uses PowerPC 604e... the same chip my PowerMac 8500 uses.

    There are many Power3 top500 clusters, such as position #2, but there are also many PowerPC604e spots ...

    check the list yourself and quit lying by saying that there are not mac-style cpus : here are some (7) I saw in current ranked list :

    ASCI Blue-Pacific SST, IBM SP 604e

    Bank Administration Institute (BAI) SP PC604e 332 MHz

    BCDI - SP PC604e 332 MHz

    Metallurgical Industry Co. - SP PC604e 332 MHz

    BASF SP PC604e 332 MHz

    DeTeCSM

    DeTeCSM

    And NONE of the top500.org uses linux OS... none as far as I know. That was true a year ago and is still true.

    Macs are indeed 1 Ghz , by the way. Thats why the XServe is over twice as fast as the fastest amd dual mp at rc5... macs arent only 500Mhz, they are 1Ghz in recent months, standard and cheap.

  121. "gotten" -ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are lamenting poor literacy on Slashdot then perhaps you should have known "become" would be a better choice of word rather than "gotten".