Slashdot Mirror


The Last Place

angela morgenstern writes "Buddhist Bhutan was the last place on earth to legalize television. Trading traditional practices for daytime soaps and WWF, many fear that western influence will trample the culture." A whole set of articles about the effect of American television on one of the most remote places on earth - it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".

469 comments

  1. No escape? by warmcat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure there is, turn off your TV, prise your kids out of the kid-shaped depression in the sofa and do other things that don't require you to be passive and watch ads to give you a value system.

    1. Re:No escape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and do other things that don't require you to be passive..."

      I thought being passive was the whole idea behind being a monk!

    2. Re:No escape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A vaule system where the almighty buck is held in the highest regard. Hey, I want a system like that, then we only have to pretend we care about people, animals, and the earth.

      You want to know the main problem I have with Americans? Its a lit cigarette, not a "lighted" one - coloUr has got a U in it, and "normalcy" isn't a fucking word!! The word you are looking for is normality.

      Damn Yankies!

    3. Re:No escape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We generally have all our teeth, so the compensatory stressors needed in the UK aren't needed to distinguish words.

    4. Re:No escape? by hofer · · Score: 1

      Why is the parent post modded as "Funny"? Maybe that is the heart of this "cultural" problem! That post is supposed to be insightful ! Oh dear...

      --
      Score:1, Unread
    5. Re:No escape? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      What if you enjoy the value system that TV gives you?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    6. Re:No escape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American and culture, oxymoron??

  2. Wow by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

    How did this actually get posted on /. ?

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me wonders too...
      "What's the difference between Yoghurt & the US? Yoghurt has culture"

    2. Re:Wow by jini · · Score: 1

      OK it is low tech, but any sort of crap appears on slashdot these days.

    3. Re:Wow by Hrshgn · · Score: 1

      And just like in yoghurt there needs to be growth for some time until you can really call it 'culture'.

    4. Re:Wow by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Possibly because it's, oh I dunno, thought provoking? If that's not enough for you, just mentally add on some extremely tenuous connection to geek culture and pretend the byline sez "Jon Katz."

      Thought here: What if a society like that could go from no electronic media to ubiquitous Internet access? Would they actually use the more open medium to tell their own stories, sing their own songs, propagate their own culture? Or would they just replace the mindless WWF/soap opera/Pantene ad parroting with "I wanna Linux Penguin", or worse yet, "I wanna FREE PHD and an ENLARGED PENIS!"

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    5. Re:Wow by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

      Well, it might be thought provoking to the average joe blow idiot. If you actually knew anything about the world's poorer regions, you'd know that:

      The United Nations and World Bank use $1-$2 (PPP) per day as an international poverty line, indicating a lack of access to basic sustenance. In 1998 1.2 billion people had consumption levels less that $1 per day and 2.8 billion less than $2 per day.

    6. Re:Wow by operagost · · Score: 1

      Then Bhutan isn't a poor country, because their per capita GDP is $1,100, or just over $3/day.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. American influence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans just doesn't get it, most simply don't understand how good they have it.

    1. Re:American influence. by dvanduzer · · Score: 1, Funny

      Americans just doesn't get it, most simply don't understand how good they have it.

      45 cable television channels, featuring everything from the BBC to Baywatch, all for about $5 a month

      How good we have it? I would *kill* for such low cable bills!

  4. WWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does the world wildlife fund have to do with any of this?

    1. Re:WWF by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      Hmm... Wildlife fund you say? I suppose that's the guys funding Slashdot.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:WWF by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 1

      Some of those wild animals are really violent!

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    3. Re:WWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they are referring to the World Wrestling federation? Another fine american export....yuh.

    4. Re:WWF by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      As most people now know, the WWF (World Wrestling Federation) has changed it's name to WWE in order to keep the World Wildlife Foundation people happy.

      The funny part of the story stems from the massive rename process that had to take place. They had to change advertising, building signs, letterhead, billing, countless things, really. Their project plan's name? "Get The 'F' Out!"

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  5. "...all for about $5 a month." by Erik_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the report it says : "Rinzy has hooked up this secluded society to 45 cable television channels, featuring everything from the BBC to Baywatch, all for about $5 a month: the price of a bag of red chillies."
    Is that the cost of a bag of red chillies in the United States ? How much buying power is $5 in Bhutan ? So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

    1. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by jamieo · · Score: 1

      I can't say exactly how far $5 goes in Bhutan, but I've been to neighbouring countries and can tell you $5 is way too much to buy a bag of chillies (unless you mean a donkey load of them) and will go a long way.

      For comparison I hired 2 people - a guide and a porter - for $11/day for 3 weeks. By local standards this was a very respectable wage. We are talking national average incomes of the order of $4 per week ($200 per year - yes that's no typo!).

      So it will be only the rich people who can afford $5/month for such TV access.

    2. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by laa · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...with the risk of being unbearably dull...

      The GNP per capita 1995 for US seems to be $26 062, ranking at 12th postition. Bhutan, again, is 145th with a GNP per capita of $172. So, I suspect five bucks is a huge portion of a normal monthly salary.

      --
      Why does the kernel go through stable and then unstable forks? Can't it always be a stable build, like with Windows?
    3. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by Zarf · · Score: 3, Funny

      So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

      Sounds like TV in Alaska.

      --
      [signature]
    4. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by io333 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

      Exactly. And plenty of folks there are going to want to purchase those things. And they're going to realize that they need to quit hanging out in the monestary so often, or meditating, or whatever other unproductive things they do and GET A JOB.

      And in a few years they're gonna be waking up early every morning and going to a job they hate and busting their butt every friggin' day, just like you & me, to get all that stuff.

      Welcome to the west.

    5. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      You were OK with hiring these people at such a miserable wage? Why didn't you pay them for real? $11 per hour for instance? Western cheapskate.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by twem2 · · Score: 1

      $5 will be quite a lot.

      As an aside, Bhutan's King and government don't see GNP as important. They're much more interested in GNH, Gross National Happiness.

    7. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Expand the time scale a bit and you might see some other contexts. Rather than jumping into pie in the sky schemes and risk getting burnt like Argentenia, they might sit back and watch and learn from the world. After a sufficient period of time has passed, they implement a soultion derived from the worlds' mistakes.

      Progress is dependant on the time scale used. If the scope of progress were in 1998, many would say that Enron and Worldcom were great examples of progress. Expand the time scale a bit and someapparent progresses resolve to dead-end scenerios.

      Large scale corruption is a dead-end scenerio. It's toasted China over and over again, and is eating away at us too. Lots of other dead ends. These days it seems people are emulating survival instincts of roaches or rats as methods of progress. Not a very pretty picture for humanity if such methodologies turn out to be the most succesful. But that's a whole 'nother can of worms, where we get into how anarchy is for the rich and zero tolerence is for the poor.

    8. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by medraut · · Score: 1

      Ever give a streetchild a 'large' sum of money infront of his fellows ? If you did, did you stick around to watch them proceed to mug him ?

      Btw, those of you who look too deeply into things should stear right clear of this post.

    9. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You were OK with hiring these people at such a miserable wage?

      You pay people by their value in the country they live in.

      For example, many from Europe and Japan would say that Western companies are cheapskates because so many pay so far under their minimum wage.

      However, this sits fine with North Americans because our overall cost of living is lower.

      Its all relative, and if you are paying what is a reasonable, livable wage for the country you are in, you shouldn't be penalized for it (Unless you aren't treating the workers by international humanitarian standards).

      I suppose the question is, would it be wrong for an European or Japanese to buy a burger from an American McDonald's?

    10. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by doubtless · · Score: 2

      If you really read the article, there's a link about the country that stated the GNP at about $1000 for year 2000.

      So I guess $5 is about 6-7% of monthly salary.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    11. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're making two assumptions here. First, that local stations will purchase American some programming. That may well happen but is far from a certainty. Secondly, and most importantly, that they will show American ads. That makes exactly zero sense. They would show ads targeted towards the local population. No other country I know of, even with some American TV and movies, has ads for exclusively American products. Do you really think that they will broadcast directly from American channels??

    12. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by droleary · · Score: 2

      Is that the cost of a bag of red chillies in the United States ? How much buying power is $5 in Bhutan ?

      Who cares? You're missing the big picture! Why the hell can they wire remote areas for cable at $5/month but I can't get it right in the middle of my pre-wired metro area without paying an order of magnitude more? I mean, damn, just the listing of what's on costs twice as much from the TiVo people!

    13. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      I was just thinking... why does it have to be American TV they're watching?

      Why can't they make their own programming. TV doesn't have to be evil.. it's what you watch.

    14. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by cthulhu_will_rise · · Score: 1

      It is important to note that for quite a few years the Bhutanese have persued a plan of English language literacy. At one point all scholastic instruction was conducted in English but this was rolled back as it appeared that this was having a detrimental effect on the health of their native culture. Perhaps leading to this is the fact that the majority of the gov't higherups attended U.S. universities. As such, it makes sense that they would seek out English language programming. Having been there a little over a year ago, I seem to remember most of the programming being U.S., some BBC, a little Hindi programming and some Bhutanese productions.

    15. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Here in Canada, many of the stations we rebroadcast from the states are localized. So it's definately a possibility.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    16. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by sn00ker · · Score: 1
      Who cares? You're missing the big picture! Why the hell can they wire remote areas for cable at $5/month but I can't get it right in the middle of my pre-wired metro area without paying an order of magnitude more? I mean, damn, just the listing of what's on costs twice as much from the TiVo people!
      So, what you're really saying is that you don't understand purchasing power and other basic economic concepts.
      What can that US$5 buy you at home? What can it buy you in Bhutan?
      Chances are that in Bhutan, for US$5, you can fill the tank of one of those monstrosities that Detroit is so fond of. Try doing that on US$5 back in the US, even with your insanely low petrol prices.
      Get a clue, and come back when you've found one.

      --
      "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
    17. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by droleary · · Score: 2

      So, what you're really saying is that you don't understand purchasing power and other basic economic concepts.

      No, what I guess I'm having to say is that you seem to have no sense of humor.

      What can that US$5 buy you at home? What can it buy you in Bhutan?

      Please fill free to post a link to the price of common consumer items in Bhutan. Until you do, you're talking out of your ass.

    18. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by sn00ker · · Score: 1
      What can that US$5 buy you at home? What can it buy you in Bhutan?
      Please fill free to post a link to the price of common consumer items in Bhutan. Until you do, you're talking out of your ass.
      Try here
      As you can see, in 1995 Bhutan had a per-capita GNP of $172, while the US was at over $26,000. GNP is generally considered a good way of working out relative values - In other words, that $5 in Bhutan is worth about $755 in the US.

      You were saying?

      --
      "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
    19. Re:"...all for about $5 a month." by droleary · · Score: 2

      You were saying?

      I was saying I wanted you to post a link to the price of common consumer items in Bhutan. You have failed to do so.

      What you seem unable to understand is that the per-capita income of the people doesn't significantly reduce the cost of items, but rather increases the value proposition. A $300 iPod doesn't suddenly cost $3 when you cross the border, rather the value of such an item suddenly must be the equivalent of $30,000 to make it worth having. Needless to say, I wouldn't expect many in Bhutan to be dancing around with a portable MP3 player any time soon.

      When you actually understand something about economics, I hope you'll post again.

  6. they will be less affected than is thought by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have only just got back from SEasia and could not find much to watch on their TV as they have their own programming that I found terrible. They have a good strong culture of their own and I think it will prevail. I had to resort to MTVasia and the BBC world. Even MTVasia is their own bubble pop rather than the stuff we are used to. As the tube moves into Bhutan I think it will be asian TV that goes with it and they will not get this expected burst of western "culture" when it arrives.

    American "culture" ? is that an oxymoron ?

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have only just got back from SEasia and could not find much to watch on their TV as they have their own programming that I found terrible. Even MTVasia is their own bubble pop rather than the stuff we are used to.

      Not find much? I'm from Sweden, and I have lived in Thailand for the last three years. The range of american shows and movies is far superior to that of networks in Sweden (and we only watch American stuff). I've never missed out on a single show that has been mentioned here on Slashdot over the years, for example. I think you must have stayed in cheap hotels, with no cable connections.

      As for their locally produced shows, they are quite the same as American daytime TV (I speak the language), and they are mostly shown during the day. In the evenings, there is a more serious tone, and lots of American movies and Hong Kong Action (suff from Jackie Chan & co that you've never even heard of).

      And as for bubble pop, I don't know. I'm a raver, and depending on the channel you choose, you can completely avoid bubble pop (which is pretty omnipotent all over the world anyway - buoeh for boybands). There are channels with nothing but techno, ambient, trip hop, and so on, much of it locally produced at top international standards.

      I'd say that South East Asia is not the arsehole you'd suggest. Just because you don't understand the language doesn't mean that what they say is shit.

    2. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by australopithecus · · Score: 1
      Even though the programming that is shown in SEAsia and is localized, it is all based on the idea of emulating western TV. For example, the comapny I have been working for all summer has launched a channel in China where one of the programs is, for all intents and purposes, a chinese version of "Friends".
      TV as we know it is by and large a western phenomenon. On the site, there is a testimonial about what the kid like to watch. The description is really quite similar to the processed U.S. soap opera crap.
      Even if the programs that are playing are completely produced and aired in one country, the impact provided from advertisments will be significant, especially to a country that has never had TV before.

      "hi, id like a k2 size fries, and a dragon sized buddha burger to go"

    3. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by beckmann · · Score: 1

      I agree with you're main point - its definitely possible to maintain one's culture despite changes like the introduction of TV. Some things will change, but not all. Visit southern Germany if you don't agree...

      However, "American culture" isn't an oxymoron: John Irving, Andy Warhol, Kurt Vonnegut, Sousa, Harriert Beecher Stowe; Jazz, Rock&Roll, Comic Books, and Football are all exmaples of good American culture. It just sucks that the image broadcasted by media giants speaks the loudest and isn't the best part of an otherwise rich heritage.

    4. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Rock&Roll, Comic Books, and Football are all exmaples of good American culture"

      So there you have it: American "culture" IS an oxymoron :)

    5. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by PSC · · Score: 2

      American "culture" ? is that an oxymoron ?

      Well for sure it's not a tautology :-)

      --
      --- The light at the end of the tunnel is probably a burning truck.
    6. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buddha burger, that is wrong on just so many levels.

    7. Re:they will be less affected than is thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all buddhists are vegan pussies like you.

  7. Ah yes! by Lucky_Pierre · · Score: 1

    And you really believe we only watch American TV shows here in Asia? Typical Anti-American Euro-trash ranting....

    --
    "Whenever the cause of the people is entrusted to professors, it is lost." ~ V.I. Lenin
    1. Re:Ah yes! by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      Your comment would make a lot more sense if it actually were Europeans making the comments. Check the facts a bit. The site hosting the article is PBS, which is American. And the people writing the stories are Americans. So no Europeans here!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:Ah yes! by australopithecus · · Score: 1

      well, if it isnt dubbed or subtitled American (or British) programming, its a local language program based on the same sitcom/drama/soap opera paradigm.
      The Hindi version of "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" was one of the highest rated programs ever in India.

    3. Re:Ah yes! by AmInParis · · Score: 0
      Typical Anti-American Euro-trash ranting....

      Thank you for expressing my exact sentiments. I'm so sick of this BS the whole world gives America about their "culture". I'm tired of seeing "Yankee go home!" scrawled on American movie posters in the metro (as if the individual had any idea what he was talking about but says this because he thinks he is somehow "better"). Here are a couple of things to think about.

      The last time I checked, most countries were sovereign and not controlled by the U.S. As far as I know, U.S. businesses do not hold a gun to the heads of foreign governments or their businesses to force them to accept American products/services. If you want to complain, do so to your local government and businesses for allowing U.S. interests in.

      American businesses are in business for one reason - to make money! When America opens a business overseas it expects to make money. Who do you think is buying their products? That's right - you and your countrymen. So if you're looking for someone to blame, blame yourself and your friends. If you didn't support the business, it would dry up and blow away (cf. Burger King in France).

      American business creates foreign business. A quick flip of the tv remote shows that about half of the things on in Paris are old (and some new) American shows that have been dubbed. Better still, the dubbing houses that are handling this are usually just a few miles down the road in Neuilly. Do you think they want to get rid of American products?

      Anti-American sentiment is chic right now. You can be a slack-assed, don't wanna work, socialist but hey, don't be so down on yourself. You can blame the Americans! One of my favorite examples of this is the French farmer who was jailed for damaging a McDonald's with his tractor. He was protesting American Imperialism. Funny thing was that most of the product used there is from France (including the low-grade meat). That particular franchise was also owned in France. Moreover, who do you think gets jobs from that McDonald's? Local people!

      If you don't like American business in your area, don't support it. Better yet, get off your ass, try working a real work week, do a good job for once, try to keep strikes to less than one a year, and BUILD A BETTER BUSINESS. "If you build it, they will come." American products fill a hole. If YOU can fill the hole better, you will drive them out. Until then, shut the hell up.

    4. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Euro-trash"? Surely you noticed that the USA is on a different *continent* from Europe?

      And just like all of Asia is not a single culture, neither is Europe.

    5. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we bought you... Watch or else!

    6. Re:Ah yes! by BritInParis · · Score: 1

      low grade meat ? oh, you mean without hormones and other chemical additives ? the stuff that makes americans so fat ? oh, and BTW, from my experience, americans are some of the laziest full-of-shit people I know of. Jackass.

    7. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holding guns to foreign governements heads is EXACTLY what the US does, repeatedly, ever hear of south america ? palestine ? Jackass

    8. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your comment would make a lot more sense if it actually were Europeans making the comments.

      Just because they are americans doesn't mean they can't be anti-American Euro-trash. It continues to be quite popular in certain American circles, to bash its modern culture and yearn wistfully for the fine European system.

    9. Re:Ah yes! by netsharc · · Score: 1

      "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" seems to be successful everywhere in the world. So far I've heard of German, French, Arabic, Australian and Indonesian versions of it (the currency there is so weak so I think they give out 100 million Rupiahs) And of course Indian. And English. Wouldn't be surprised if there's a version for each country where TV-culture dominates.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    10. Re:Ah yes! by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 1

      Did you see the Saturday Night Live parody of that, called Who Wants To Eat? While it was a bit mean spirited, it did point out that fat lazy americans in sitting in front of our idiot boxes have it too easy. Millions around the world dream of just having basic food, clothing and shelter. Some of these live in Bhutan. I especially liked how the hungry contestants could not name the eating disorder in which people starve themselves because they are afraid of getting fat, anorexia. The very idea was too absurd for them to imagine. I hope American TV and culture flop in Bhutan.

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    11. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh absolutly. As the original poster of that little +2 rant above us, I agree that it is unfair to tar individual American citizens with the same brush. Some Americans have see the light. I'm married to a women who has, for example. She spent a year living in the Netherlands, learnt Dutch, and now lives with me here in the UK. We may move to the US for a short while, or someplace else in Europe, or maybe even Australasia. So no, not every American is the same. Sadly, its the majority who are.

    12. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a few Americans know alot more about the world than you.
      You seem to forget the millions of Americans who have served and continue to serve around the world. I've lived in Asia for almost 25 years because of my military service.
      If you like it so much, go ahead and wallow with the Euro-Trash. You're welcome to each other!

    13. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wallow in the Euro Trash?

      Europe being an extremely intesting and diverse area of the planet with rich culture and history.
      Oh hell yeah I'll go wallow :-)

    14. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love being lazy and full of shit and practically getting paid to post on slashdot.

      The wonders of a US government IT job.

    15. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25 years in the military and all he could come up with is "euro-trash" you obviously paid real close attention for those 25 years didnt you. moron.

    16. Re:Ah yes! by AmInParis · · Score: 0
      low grade meat ? oh, you mean without hormones and other chemical additives ?

      No, I mean the tough-as-shit steak I seem to find everywhere I eat. I'm not saying American beef is the best. I've had good steak in Argentina, Germany, and Italy. I'm saying the majority of it in France sucks.

      BTW, it's not the hormones and chemicals that makes Americans fat. It's the eating too damn much (simple nutrition should tell you that).

      Lazy? Maybe we can discuss that over "le pont" next week or one of your upcoming RTT's? That is if you're not already on strike at the time or busy petitioning your employer for a bonus for returning from "la grève".

      Maybe my rant has obscured the point but the point is this: no one forces you to buy into American culture. America isn't a force of God or nature. You have a say in your world. Governments do this all the time. Witness the EU tariffs regarding steel production in the US or France's taiffs with pineapple production. Don't sit and whine about "the Americans". Whether you like it or not, money talks. Bullshit walks.

      Oh, lest I forget.... Jackass :)

    17. Re:Ah yes! by operagost · · Score: 1
      I hope that Bhutan's monarch starts making sure his people are eating. Starvation is sure to make that Gross National Happiness rating drop.

      Or is the United States supposed to be the world's caretaker again today?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You seem to forget the millions of Americans who have served and continue to serve around the world. I've lived in Asia for almost 25 years because of my military service."

      What the hell does that show??? That you know how to shuffle papers or pump gas into aircraft in Asia as well?? Are you saying serving in the US military overseas you magically become enlightened??
      your still living by US rules on US controlled soil, I think you will need to elaborate a little bit better there.

    19. Re:Ah yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those'll be the circles where the average IQ is higher than the average shoe size, no doubt.

    20. Re:Ah yes! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      I think the parent poster is definitely a jackass, but for you to say that "Americans are some of the laziest full-of-shit people I know" is pretty ignorant. Read today's Wall Street Journal. Ever since WWII hours per year spent working on average has dropped significantly in Europe while it has dropped only slightly in the US. Americans work about 1800 hours a year, while Europeans work about 1400 hours per year. They take lots of vacation and value their "leisure time" very highly. I think that's a great attitude, and they shouldn't have to work so much if they don't want to. But don't call Americans lazy, because that's such bullshit.

  8. What's with the quotes? by glennrrr · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'll put The Simpson's and other high points of American culture against any other "culture" past or present.

    1. Re:What's with the quotes? by mike_sucks · · Score: 2

      Hah Har! Loser!

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
    2. Re:What's with the quotes? by tunah · · Score: 2

      Um... the simpsons spends half its shows making fun of american culture. I love the simpsons, but there must be a better example.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    3. Re:What's with the quotes? by Izeickl · · Score: 1

      I think trying to point out that The Simpson's goes along with "other high points of American culture" itself indicates that there is very little culture, past or present.

    4. Re:What's with the quotes? by moogla · · Score: 2

      At least we know how to laugh at ourselves. Give us that, at least.

      Also, I think "culture" is overrated. I'm creating beautiful disarray, ejaculate meaningless drivel. I like doing whatever the fuck I want when I want, all of the time.

      For example, I like saying fuck. FUCK FUCK FUCK!!!
      Try it, feels gooooood

      --
      Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
    5. Re:What's with the quotes? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      The Simpsons is too self-referential as far as culture. It's one big mockery OF Western Culture, but it's fixating on the symptoms.

      I don't like it, but I would say Seinfeld was one of the high points of unmistakably American culture- particularly the famous last episode which illustrates exactly what Seinfeld was about all along. Seinfeld is vicious, mean, cheap, self-absorbed, pitiless, joyless... the few times I saw it I just did NOT 'get' it, I couldn't see what the hell was supposed to be so funny about this hugely popular show. When I read about that final episode, that notorious final episode, then I got it, and I respected the nerve of it. Seinfeld was observational humor on a grand scale, and what was being observed was the practical result of Western culture and values- a fantastic integration of what you might call Western Corporate Capitalism into the characters' very psyches. They were pitiful, utterly isolated- the only interaction they could do with anything was the crudest sort of tearing-down. There were no connections, no social context for them, no home or support- the ultimate nihilism- and the show's observational humor was built on that void, which resonated with the American viewing audience.

      That is why I think 'Seinfeld' is the ultimate expression of American Culture.

      That is also why I think 'American Culture' as it stands today is poisonous and unworthy of being exported. It's like, you could have a form of cancer that infected really well, and spread really fast, making it by far the most efficient organism around- it just kills its host, woopsy. Is that a reason to infect people with it? "Look, it expands really fast! That must mean it's good for you!"

  9. "No Escape from American 'culture'?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bullshit. You don't wanna watch it, you don't have to. Pull the plug, turn off the TV, don't buy it in the first place. Meanwhile, I'll be content to indulge myself in the fine quality of American TV, thank you very much.

    *flip* Rerun...
    *flip* Crap...
    *flip* Crappy rerun...

    1. Re:"No Escape from American 'culture'?" by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Talk about reruns, old TV series actually quite popular in developing countries, imagine a place that has never had TV. Why would it matter if they ran shows from back from the 50's? Hundreds of years of material to catch up with, it's The Dukes of Hazzard, Six Million Dollar Man, Knight Rider, The A-Team, Airwolf, Simpsons and Seinfeld all over again. And don't forget The Brady Bunch, Fonz and the Gang (Happy Days) Mission Impossible (old and new), etc, etc.

      Thinking of those shows, TV felt much better when I was younger, I think people's bullshit tolerance decrease the older they get, at least that's happening to me.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:"No Escape from American 'culture'?" by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      I recently visited Egypt, and while there, at least 5 or 6 different times had people come up saying something along the lines of "Hello!! Are you from America? Yes?? Hi Ho Silver!!"

      Very friendly people, and loved trying to use their english, and also saying "Hi ho silver!!!" :)

  10. Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by tjensor · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".
    Sure there is. Here are a set of simple instructions.
    1) Locate point of entry for electricity in to your house.
    2) Disconnect Electricity (some car is advised at this point). 3) Locate all telephones in house.
    4) Smash telephones with Hammer, or other large heavy object (possibly your now useless VCR).
    5) Locate large wads of cotton wool.
    6) Insert cotton wool in to ears (in case of passing boombox).
    7) Never leave house.

    Never mind Pax Americana, fear Pax AOL / Time Warner.

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
    1. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by timme · · Score: 1

      > Never mind Pax Americana, fear Pax AOL / Time Warner.

      That's the same thing, isn't it ?

    2. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that some typical American exaggerated "solution" to problems ?

      Who built all those bunkers for Y2K ? =)

    3. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... 6) Insert cotton wool in to ears (in case of passing boombox).
      7) Never leave house.

      8) ???
      9) Profit

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    4. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And wait for american bombs to drop on your goat shed.

    5. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by DeadSea · · Score: 2

      Televesion isn't the problem, its the stuff on it. They should just make WWF, and other Hollywood crap illegal.

    6. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by perfects · · Score: 1

      > Televesion isn't the problem, its the
      > stuff on it. They should just make WWF,
      > and other Hollywood crap illegal.

      > Classic computer games: Ladder [ostermiller.org]
      > (Windows and Linux)

      Interesting transposition there. Is it better to zone out for two hours playing Pong or Solitaire than to watch A Beautiful Mind?

      Back to the topic at hand, and the more interesting transposition...

      The entire world is bi-polar about America. On one side you have loud complaints about American culture overwhelming the rest of the world. On the other you have people saying "let America do it". I'm not just talking about military action or famine relief. In a recent /. thread about the European Space Agency there was more than one post that said, in effect, "Why do we ( Europe) need our own space program? Let the Americans and Russians do the hard work, and we will jump in later when it's easier and more profitable".

      Well, you can't have it both ways. If you don't want your local culture to be lost to American ways, you have to elect a government that will step up to the plate and lead.

      American culture is pervasive, but not because of its quality. It's that America is seen as a world leader in many, many areas, and lots of people want to be like Americans.

      In countries where America is hated, American culture is reviled. They don't hate our politics because of the movies we make and the songs we sing, it's the other way around.

      Personally, I don't care which course any given country takes. You can make an effort to preserve your own culture -- bravo!! -- and pay the price in higher taxes to support a government that helps lead the way. Or you can follow America. Welcome aboard!! It makes no difference to me.

      But if you choose to Let America Do It, you shouldn't complain about letting America do it.

    7. Re:Avoiding US Cultural Imperialism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On slashdot, I think it has become:
      1) Post an underwear gnome list like this one (since that list on Southpark is what started this joke).
      2) ???
      3) Karma!

      There's also a strong suspicion that #2 has been figured out. Some people think that it's "crackhead mods."

  11. Excuse me... by Peridriga · · Score: 1

    *cough*...

    WWF is not that same (or at least was but, not now) as WWE..

    Are the Buddahists are worried about the "SMACKDOWN" being laid down to a Panda bear..
    Nah.. /. Editors just forget little things like big corporate lawsuits...

    1. Re:Excuse me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the world wildlife federation a big corporation then? (They certainly act like it!)

  12. Culture?!? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

    Considering the age of the american culture which isn't a very long time, one van debate whether or not america has any culture at al, considering the long lasting culture from europe and not to forget asia. Not to say what is to prefer, the old or the new. greetings from the old world. :)

    1. Re:Culture?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "one van debate whether or not america has any culture at al,"

      It is not debatable at all. FACT: The United States has no culture. I am getting the distinct impression you are posting drunk for some reason.

    2. Re:Culture?!? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

      maybe you are a little narrow minded. In my opinion everything is open for discussion. You don't have to agree of course, but mmhh..then you would be in a discussion with me. :)

    3. Re:Culture?!? by cez · · Score: 1

      ummmm....i do believe that we have some previous culture...remember those people...damn who are they...ohhh yeah NATIVE Americans...calling us the new world still is like saying...something that is ignorant that should be said! there :P

      /me looks around for an ancient Myan Crystal skull to voodoo you with

      --
      Walk with Music;
    4. Re:Culture?!? by cez · · Score: 1

      One culturistic characteristic (definately not good spalin) which i hope you would agree with that is worth something...is the thing your reading right now...wait you might not be in the u.s. so its a global culture...but where is this cultural mixing pot of a /. site located? Plus, we have the late Bob Ross and his happy lil clouds :P

      --
      Walk with Music;
    5. Re:Culture?!? by sugrshack · · Score: 2
      Okay here is a classic misunderstanding of the word "Culture." To say that the US has no culture is ridiculous.

      Here is definition 1. from dictionary.com

      culture Pronunciation Key (klchr) n.

      a) The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.
      b) These patterns, traits, and products considered as the expression of a particular period, class, community, or population: Edwardian culture; Japanese culture; the culture of poverty.
      c) These patterns, traits, and products considered with respect to a particular category, such as a field, subject, or mode of expression: religious culture in the Middle Ages; musical culture; oral culture.
      d) The predominating attitudes and behavior that characterize the functioning of a group or organization.

      Again to suggest that America has no culture would be to suggest that nobody lives in the US or they have no patterns of behavior.

      --
      I can't believe it's not lard!
    6. Re:Culture?!? by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Of course we have culture here in the US. You might not like our definition/interpretation of it, but it is a culture. Just because it hasn't been around as long as doesnt make it of lesser value. Sheesh. Get over yourselves. And if everyone thinks that what our country produces is such a bad thing, then why are they buying it? Because while we do sell it overseas at a discount (they made the bulk of the profits here) its not like what we are selling is free. If you have such a problem with it, maybe you should look within first, because we are not forcing you to choose it. Members of your own countries are making that decision.

    7. Re:Culture?!? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

      I am speechless! Nobody beats Bob Ross!!

  13. Hmm by af_robot · · Score: 1, Troll

    What is so "wrong" with American culture? Why everybody hates it?! If our culture can so easily break your own traditions from usual TV broadcasts then you should blame only yourself, not Americans. And if you don't like American Rationalism then welcome back to medieval age...

    1. Re:Hmm by velco · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is so "wrong" with American culture? Why everybody hates it?! If our culture can so easily break your own traditions from usual TV broadcasts then you should blame only yourself, not Americans. And if you don't like American Rationalism then welcome back to medieval age...

      Nothing's wrong with American culture. Nor with the USA "culture", it's just that people outside USA don't call WWF, McDonalds and The Simpsons "culture".

      ~velco

    2. Re:Hmm by jamieo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you happy with US "culture" as it is today? By that term I do not mean real US culture (there is some), but the jokingly termed "culture" many non-US people label for things like Disney, Coke, WWF, etc.

      Travelling around the US you see that such companies have had, what I believe, to be a very negative effect. Everywhere you go it all looks the same, tastes the same, hears the same (same music industry manufactured "pop"), etc. Local and regional flavour is lost. This is great if you like Taco Bell, only drinking Coke and listening to Britney. But there is a lot more to life than that!

      Why is it popular in other countries? Well, 2 reasons:

      1) The *good* thing about the US - **freedom**. You live a very privelidged life compared to many people of the world. Many people of the world see the US and freedom as being very related things. So when they are given a bit of freedom they have previously lacked, they gravitate towards such things. Think as a teenager and how you behaved once given freedom from parents.

      2) This is a not so good thing about the US - **money**. Consider the situation in Bhutan as an example. At the moment there are local (very small) companies that make soft drinks - these won't be copies of Coke, etc., but will be genuine different soft drinks you've never experienced. As Bhutan opens itself up, Coca Cola will move in and either set up a new company to manufacture their drinks, or buy existing ones. People will buy their drinks first of all because of #1 above - it's new, it's cool, etc. Within a very short time, there will be no local soft drinks made. The reason for this will *not* be because Coke is better and people only want it. It will be because the Coca Cola company have the financial muscle to completely control the soft drinks industry of that country. This is not good.

      #2 applies to things much more than soft drinks, TV, etc. When you're talking about 3rd world countries and things like agricultural seed supplies and strictly controlled genetically engineered crops, this can have a very bad effect. It's very realistic for companies akin to Monsanto to completely control who areas of agricultural production in these kinds of countries.

      So if you believe "raionalism" is #2 above, and this is a good thing, you can surely extrapolate this to meaning there will eventually be only 1 of anything in the world - a single soft drink we all only buy, a single type of car, etc. I don't think this will be a nice place to live.

      Left uncontrolled, #2 will eventually remove much of the choice and freedom in the world, thereby harming the greatest thing about the US, #1.

    3. Re:Hmm by af_robot · · Score: 1

      Well, i don't like WWF, but what is wrong with McDonalds and The Simpsons?!
      There are some kinds of fast-food restaurants in every country and McDonalds is not SO bad.
      The Simpsons is just plain damn funny for everyone who has similar cultural background!
      Yes, if you was born in Islamic country then i'm sure you wont find it funny...but you HAVE the choice, if you don't like, don't watch it, don't eat at McDonalds, don't read USA news sites - nobody forces you..

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the arabic simpsons. I would learn arabic just to watch that.

    5. Re:Hmm by tahirbond · · Score: 0

      Yes, if you was born in Islamic country then i'm sure you wont find it funny...

      Why's that?

    6. Re:Hmm by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the problem with American culture is that it tends suck you in and forget about the others.

      Let me give you an example. In the US there is a wine company that sells itself as Cabris, which is actually a region in France that is know to sell a good white wine. Well the American company took advantage of this to "con" people. The French region on the other hand has problems now because people get confused by the marketing message.

      The problem of American culture is not the American's themselves, but the companies that take advantage of situations. Corporations in their quest for profits and bigger market share do not care a rat's butt about culture. Just more money. And in the past that has not been a problem. But now in a global economy that is a problem. Since it means some things will be lost, even though they should not be.

      The American corporations are just too damm efficient at taking over the world. Result is hatred. Whenever you see people hating America, do you see people hating individual American's? Nope just icons, flag, McDonalds, jeans, etc.

      I think that the challenge of this century will not be tech, or political, but social. This century will be the century when humanity is tested to see if we can truly live together! Or if we are doomed to be fighting each other. We have the technology to destroy each other and we have the means to live together.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    7. Re:Hmm by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh...like any American knows what Cabris is.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Hmm by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. American wine sells in Europe too, and if you see a French Cabris and a Californian Cabris side by side, how are you going to make the difference?
      Most people not very knowledgable in wine will take the cheapest one, and guess which one that will be. Note, in defense of American wines: I didn't say the "best", I said the "cheapest". Some American wines are really much better than some French stuff they sell at horrendous prices. But that's probably just me, for I'm a beerdrinker not a winedrinker.

    9. Re:Hmm by Angry+Toad · · Score: 2

      Actually I think this is all a pretty interesting issue. What is it about the influence of American culture that makes it so pervasive and insidious that it pretty much instantly infects and metastasizes inside cultures hundreds or even thousands of years older?

      Rationalism? Well, maybe to a degree, but I don't think the WWF, Rosie O'Donnell, and When Aliens Attack IV really represents the height of the Western Rational tradition.

      Freedom? Hmmmm... again maybe to a degree but probably not in the way people are thinking about. Consumerism (of which I freely admit to being an addict as much as the next guy) tends to blur over and confuse itself with Freedom, but it isn't freedom in the same sense that the framers of the constitution thought about. What it is about is a much more elementary and slightly infantile wish for instant gratification and godlike immediate access to all objects of desire. This is a human universal, so the appeal there is obvious...

      The Big Corporate Conspiracy? It always comes up, but moving past the tinfoil-hat brigade there's an element of truth there all the same. Shows and advertisments are both crafted to go under our rational radar and appeal to the idea of the life we wish we had. We tune in to a show or watch a movie because we are entertained - traditional cultural stuff is often enjoyable in a forced and strained way (kind of like a visit with Grandma) but the latest Arnie movie is a cheap date who wants to go home with you right now. Who doesn't like that? The Corporate Media (hate using that term, but let's not pretend it doesn't exist) craft the American Media Experience to appeal instantly to everyone, and they do it in a darwinian environment that encourages doing it better all the time. Can the ten-thousandth retelling of Fred the Barber and His Magic Scissors compete with Sex In The City?

      The real problem with this is that people tend to confuse success with value. I think that's what angers the anti-american-culture reactionaries.

    10. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you see a French Cabris and a Californian Cabris side by side, how are you going to make the difference? Most people not very knowledgable in wine will take the cheapest one,

      So, I'm guessing you'd take Schaeffer over Sam Adams, because obviously, the important thing is the price. Especially given that alcoholic beverages have a long tradition of reciprocal relations between price and quality.

    11. Re:Hmm by af_robot · · Score: 2

      Thank you for very intelligent reply and very strong points.

      American culture (mostly the entertainment area) is like cocaine - once you've tried it you can't live without it...It is tailored for the people and sharpened to penetrate instantly into average men's mind.

      It is just like business competition of different cultures.. If your own culture can offer you better or to least same way to live (read entertain) than American's, then it can survive. Otherwise, it is doomed. So don't blame us, you have to offer something better or survive.

      No one really wants to live in a traditional culture without movies, TVs and internet.

    12. Re:Hmm by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      And here is the point to a T. I drink wine and really like it. But the problem in the wine community is that people in Europe are stuck up about American wines because marketing companies do these dumb stunts. There are good American wines, but those get tarnished by corporations that only see profit. And all of this cummulates into hate of America, when it was just a few dumb companies.

      What I sometimes miss among some American corporations and some American politicians is a global attitude.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    13. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they fucking hate yanks.

    14. Re:Hmm by AmInParis · · Score: 0

      Gee, I'm sorry I don't really have anything to add but, "you're right". Very cogently said.

    15. Re:Hmm by operagost · · Score: 1
      If that were the extent of our "culture", you would be correct. But yours is just another straw-man argument. Our "culture", good or bad, consists of many influential things:

      Jazz, Blues, Rock'n'roll, and country music
      Hollywood
      Baseball, american football, basketball
      Andy Warhol et al
      Henry David Thoreau, Stephen King, et al
      Hooters (just kidding)

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      single word: materialistic

    17. Re:Hmm by Overd0g · · Score: 1

      You have many unsupported assertions. If American corps. were so reviled, they wouldn't be successful. If American culture was so bad, it wouldn't sell. If other, native cultures were so valuable, people would value them above American culture and they would survive. The reason American corps. and culture is so successful is that it focusses on average people's desires, not the desires of a cultural elite. People gladly trade their native cultures for American culture. Supply and demand.

    18. Re:Hmm by cez · · Score: 1

      sure american culture might be like cocaine...but then there are those other cultures to try, Italian culture is like MDMA, English culture is like Opium, Australian culture is like Beer...you have to realize not everyone likes cocaine! some people get off on different things...i think that its the forcing of culture on people that is wrong....definately throw it out there to give them a chance to accept it or like it...but to "push" it on someone...although you can't lick the coke and not sniff it...if you are going to semi-american-culturize...don't complain about hearing about the rest of it!

      --
      Walk with Music;
    19. Re:Hmm by WeedMonkey · · Score: 1
      McDonalds is not SO bad

      Yeah, and Outlook isn't THAT insecure.

    20. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, you are wrong. American culture for many non-Americans is synonymous with money and a better life. That is why they are able to gladly trade their own culture for a few dollars more.

    21. Re:Hmm by Zemran · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another example would be Buddweiser . I prefer the original but buying the real Buddweiser can get a little confusing especially when the American version calls itself original even though the Czech version has been around longer than America.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    22. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Budweiser was a German beer.

    23. Re:Hmm by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First that is a very narrow minded attitude. This is the reason why people get annoyed at American attitudes. Yes people want some parts of the American dream. But there is nothing wrong with that. Just like how Americans want part of the European dream, by driving European vehicles or using Swiss Showers (which btw I have no idea ever existed and I live in Switzerland).

      The problem is that many American corps have an in your face attitude, whereas other global companies are not quite that bad. Consider Nestle, which is the biggest producer of food globally and they produce an almost majority of the processed food consumed by Americans. Does the average American know that? Not likely because Nestle is very deversified and adjusts their food to local cultures. Then consider Walmart, which tries to do everything their way. It works in the US, partially Canada and partially Mexico, but they are getting their butt kicked in Europe. Consider the opposite case of Carrefour which is kicking Walmarts butt globally by respecting local cultures. Not all American corps do this. A prime example are the music labels and MTV. They adjust their content respective to each country. In India MTV is VERY different than MTV in America or MTV in Europe. MTV adjusts to local tastes and languages. Or even CNN. CNN Europe (CNN Spain, CNN Italy, CNN Germany) is not CNN America.

      That is my point. There are ways to become a dominate company globally...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    24. Re:Hmm by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I find it interesting that people from other country use McDonalds as an example of whats 'bad' with american culure. Yet enough people in other countries still go to one to keep them in epanding further.
      If it is so terrible, why are there lines?

      If it wasn't for the spread of American culture, the Cold war would still be on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this a Troll? Oh, he's saying good stuff about America. All Europeans just know that America is all bad.

    26. Re:Hmm by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Czech Republic

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    27. Re:Hmm by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      Let me give you an example. In the US there is a wine company that sells itself as Cabris, which is actually a region in France that is know to sell a good white wine. Well the American company took advantage of this to "con" people. The French region on the other hand has problems now because people get confused by the marketing message.
      Then they should declare war on the US. After all, it worked for the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
    28. Re:Hmm by luisdlc · · Score: 1

      I think this is the century of economical war.

      The wealth of a country depends pretty much in its exportations, or revenues that it makes for its 'exportations' (things actually manufactured in other country), the catch is that every importation a country makes is money/resources lost to the exporting one.

      'Developed' countries exports more (not in quantity, but in revenue).
      This would be enough to create friction from developing countries to developed ones. But the real problems comes from de developed ones pushing the slavement of developing ones. (The m$ case in Perú is an example, and for more examples read that discussion in /.)

      The economic growth of developed countries depends a lot on the money they get from the developing ones around. But the war is not there....

      Europe is merging to make front to USA and China, China is trying to rule throughfully their territory and trying to claim more (Taiwan, not yet under total economical control) and USA is trying to consolidate their influence in the rest of America and blocking any non American commercial influence in their 'commercial colonies'; And, as always, ruling Japanese product reach. This can actually create armed conflicts (I fear for Taiwan), but it also will ravage the developing countries as the developed unions scramble to maintain their economies growth.

      That is a fundamental problem with our economical system: It is based in constant growth, and as it has evolved, it mean constant implosion of others, this can only lead to world crisis.

  14. Waitasec. by vavenger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bhutan's top 10 cable channels.

    They mean to tell me that they get HBO in friggin' Bhutan? I can't even get it in Canada!

    1. Re:Waitasec. by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting the nicest, most magical four letter acronym of them all: CRTC.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:Waitasec. by kuiken · · Score: 1

      And ESPN, now if i only could buy MtDew there cheaper then here (.be), I am moveing!

      note: Mt dew is not sold in europe, except in some American style shops (closest i can find is 100k away) where you pay about 1$ a can

      --

      42
    3. Re:Waitasec. by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      You (and the parent) need to either: get a *real* sattelite (not one of those crappy little Bell Expressvu dishes, the ten-foot-wide ones) or stop caring and p2p whatever good shows Canadian cable misses/runs 1+ season behind (Sopranos, Osbournes, Oz, what else?) Or move to a really remote small town with non-Rogers/Shaw cable. I've seen US-only channels like HBO, etc., in places like Ymir, BC and Rainbow Lake, AB, where your "cable" is probably from some Bob or Doug with the aforementioned sattelite setup. Oh, or you could stop caring about TV and make /. your sole source of entertainment.

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    4. Re:Waitasec. by hero_or_what · · Score: 1

      Looking at the top 10 its easy to misread the impact of "American Culture"

      ESPN and Star Sports show mainly India specific content such as Cricket, Football (Soccer to Americans/Australians), Formula 1, Moto GP etc.

      While Star Movies and HBO are mainly Hollywood oriented, I suspect Sony is the India specific channel - SET.

      Going through the list its evident that all the channels are India specific that Bhutan is getting. (Including BBC and CNN!!)

      Since these channels are India specific, I think what people should be concerned about is the invasion of Indian Culture and not American. All the ads will be targetting Indian Audiences and believe it or not these contain a lot of cultural information.

  15. Spread of US "culture" by jamieo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually this is a bit more accurate than you may think. Recently I spent a month trekking in Nepal - a nearby country to Bhutan and one that has only recently (30 years) opened itself to foregin influences.

    The popularity of WWF, even high in the remote mountain villages, was not something I expected. Then again, this is usually the only "culture" the US exports.

    I also visited the country about 10 years earlier after a few months backpacking through India. For around 3 months I travelled and didn't once see a bottle/can of Coca Cola (or derivative) - it was all local soft drinks that were available. At the time it was a refreshing change, and gave you a much more local flavour.

    On my more recent trip you could *only* get Coca Cola soft drinks (Coke, Sprite, Fanta, etc.), even high in the mountains a week's travel from the nearest road. OK, they were locally manufactured (under license) and tasted different (the Fanta was nice!), but it was something that got in the way of emersing yourself in a completely different culture. As for the locals themselves, there seemed to be no benefit whatsoever for them having "Coke" soft drinks compared to the local ones before them.

    Ho hum, roll on the Disneyfication of the planet.

    1. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Zemran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that there are stacks of Coke/Fanta bottles but you can always ask for something different if you want the "local" flavour. I preferred to ask for a Watermellon shake. They use the inside of a watermelon, liquidised with ice. It is really simple and a great drink costing 10cents (up to 70 cents if you are in a hotel).

      I think a more interesting report will be "how the marketting men got on" in 5 years time. Can they really understand a culture so different ? Bhutan is classified as one of the poorest countries but there is very little real poverty. It is hard for us to relate to a country that does not need money, so we call them poor. We think of poverty as not having a TV, extreme poverty as not having food. So how do you classify poverty in a country where food is there on the trees all year round? Where people happily feed a stranger just because he is passing at meal time? Where people will work for no wages because those around them will look after them? I do agree that their culture will lose from TV but I think we have far more to learn from them. The children in Bhutan already wear t-shirts and trainers so this is not a big step but it is a step further away from the beauty of what they had.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I preferred to ask for a Watermellon shake

      Just make sure the watermelon is fresh and it isn't the rainy season, water borne diseases can play hell with your digestion.

      In some cases, Fanta etc might be safer.

    3. Re:Spread of US "culture" by tburkhol · · Score: 1
      [the lack of local soft-drinks] was something that got in the way of emersing yourself in a completely different culture

      This is the bit that confuses me. On the one hand, folk seem to be very excited about growing ease of international communication eg internet, cell phones, &c. A necessary corrolary to this is a loss, or at least reduction in, "local culture," most of which depends on relative isolation. Sometimes, this means American icons will intrude into undeveloped nations, but it also means that elements of those undeveloped nations get incorporated into America. It's harder to recognize, because you're part of it, but have you, for example, noticed how much easier it is to get good Thai food now than 10, 15 years ago?

    4. Re:Spread of US "culture" by reallocate · · Score: 1
      A while back, living in southern Africa, I had a choice of one brand of local bottled water or imported bottled water, usually Perrier. (We always filtered and boiled the local tap water, because the e coli levels were off the scale, but a bit of rain would turn the water a rich brown.) The source of the local water turned out to be a vegetation-covered pond in the middle of an busy cow pasture, with only the most rudimentary filtration. I opted to spread a little Western culture and stayed with the Perrier.

      Technologies that scale to a global equilibrium are perhaps more responsible for the spread of Western culture than anything else, including marketing and greed. In the specific case of television, it seems unreasonable to expect a culture that has never had TV to instantly ramp up the capability to produce local programming. Much simpler to grab whatever's already on the satellites.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    5. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Rayonic · · Score: 2

      > As for the locals themselves, there seemed to be no benefit whatsoever for them having "Coke" soft drinks compared to the local ones before them.

      Uhm, you're expecting some sort of change when people switch from one brand of suger water to another? And then you're blaming Coca Cola and American culture when there isn't one? You could at least try/i to hide your inherent cultural bias.

      Culture is bunk.

    6. Re:Spread of US "culture" by CvD · · Score: 1

      Is it me or is there no Fanta in the US? I've never seen it in stores or fountains the couple times that I've been to the US.

    7. Re:Spread of US "culture" by jamieo · · Score: 1

      What I meant is such a country already has a sufficient industry of soft drinks. When Coke comes in and takes over (which they do), there is no benefit for the local people. They still get soft drinks, it's not like they get better ones, or more money is pumped into the economy (what advertizing companies like Coke do pump in is more than made up for from the profits they take out).

    8. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      For that matter, there was a time when there weren't old beer cans and cigarette butts strewn by the side of the road- in Sweden.

      A bit of Westernization later, and there were- and I've never heard of any country going back and regaining its original character once it goes down this path. Something about Western Culture (tm) seems to teach people, 'consume, charge ahead towards whatever goal you claim to have, stomp anything that's in the way and chuck your trash out the window because you can't be bothered to waste time taking care of somebody ELSE'S roadside'.

      On the subject of soft drinks, anyone noticed how "Red Bull" is made in Austria? Anyone noticed how American companies are now fighting for shelf space with their own imitations, anyone get the feeling that Coke and Pepsi are just not OK with you being able to buy soft drinks from some not-Coke company in Austria? Disneyfication is an awfully cheery word for global control. It will be interesting to see whether 'Copsi' choose to kill 'Red Bull' with price cutting and subsidizing their alternatives with the sales of their regular soft drinks, or whether they choose to kill it by demanding stores not carry it and threatening to pull the regular soft drinks off the shelves. The advantage of the latter is that once Red Bull is killed they get to still sell their 25 cent ripoff sugar water at 2$ a tiny can...

      Ho fucking hum, business as usual...

    9. Re:Spread of US "culture" by pianophile · · Score: 1

      >Is it me or is there no Fanta in the US?

      I'm not 100% sure but I think Fanta has always been sold only overseas. I remember drinking it when I lived in Ghana back in '78: It was pretty much the only soft drink commonly available there. At the time you had to go to Togo to find Coca-Cola.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    10. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Overd0g · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except of course they liked it. It is annoying when the world doesn't present itself as your personal theme park or anthropological museum.

    11. Re:Spread of US "culture" by WinDoze · · Score: 1

      It was definitely here in the 70's, I remember drinking it then. Haven't actually seen it in years though. Not sure if it's no longer available or just gotten really really hard to find.

    12. Re:Spread of US "culture" by cez · · Score: 1

      We have some in nyc...LOVE THOSE COMMERCIALS FOR IT! LIKE 5 FOREIGN HOT CHICKS dancing in flimsy clothes telling you to drink fanta...its commical and sexy can't beat that!

      --
      Walk with Music;
    13. Re:Spread of US "culture" by cez · · Score: 1

      ok ok ok...now how come when I look outside my window i don't see beers and cig butts? Maybe because when if rarely there are some I pick them up and throw them away...get off your ass and do something about it, I don't think that westernization has brainwashed your citizens into dirtying the environment. thats like saying we have some many underage alcoholics over here because the drinking age is lower in europe

      --
      Walk with Music;
    14. Re:Spread of US "culture" by hether · · Score: 2

      There IS Fanta in the US. We get it here in Iowa, but its not easy to find.

      According to the Coca Cola web site, "Fanta sells best in Brazil, Germany, Spain, Japan, Italy and Argentina. Fanta distribution was increased in the U.S. in 2001 with the return of four flavors: orange, strawberry, pineapple and grape. Orange, the biggest seller, is now available in most of the country. " :-)

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    15. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Broccolist · · Score: 2
      As for the locals themselves, there seemed to be no benefit whatsoever for them having "Coke" soft drinks compared to the local ones before them.

      I find this hard to believe. If they decided to give up their local soft drinks to buy coke instead, they must have had a reason.

      As much as everybody hates big corporations, we still buy from them. Having no large brand sucks, because you can never be sure you're going to get something of good quality. With coke, you're always certain to get exactly the same drink.

    16. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the CIA World Factbook, the life expectancy in Bhutan is 53 years. Get over yourself.

    17. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and infant mortality is nearly 11%! In the US it's 0.7%.

      Damn this western materialism ...

    18. Re:Spread of US "culture" by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Actually, soft drinks are bottled under local licenses so you may not be getting the "exact" same drink in different parts of the world.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    19. Re:Spread of US "culture" by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      We have Fanta in Canada. I don't drink soft drinks myself though - just a bunch of empty carbs - no nutritional value.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    20. Re:Spread of US "culture" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So how do you classify poverty in a country
      >where food is there on the trees all year round?

      You don't "classify". You just start by cutting down every last tree for particle board, installing a "democratic" government, and giving weaposn to the ones willing to be subject to that government.

  16. Never has something so influential as television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    been so unexamined and undiscussed. Four hours per person per day is the claimed average in the United States.

  17. American Culture? by jlt9572 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is it fair to call the trash on television American Culture, or Jewish Culture?

    1. Re:American Culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's more fair to call it Kike Culture. I don't watch the tela-viv-zion any how!

  18. Bhutan Broadcasting Services' schedule for today by jukal · · Score: 2

    this is hot stuff!:

    19:00-19:15 Tonight & The News in Dzongkha
    19:15-19:20 Advertisement and announcement
    19:20-19:50 Dzongkha Gongphel
    19:50-20:00 UK TODAY Sutton Hoo- The London Marathon
    20:00-20:10 News in English
    20:10-20:15 Advertisement and announcement
    20:15-20:30 Telematch
    20:30-21:00 Telematch

    I am ready to Dzongkha! Whatever it is ;)

  19. I guess I am too young ... by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It never occured to me that there might be a place that there *ISN'T* TV.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:I guess I am too young ... by kaluta · · Score: 1

      You don't actually have to try that hard to get away from it. Whenever I've been travelling in places like China or India you don't have to get far off the backpacker trail to find villages where there is no tv. The people don't seem to miss it either... then again without a tv I guess they've got no way of knowing what they're missing :)


      Something I've seen enough times that it doesn't really surprise me anymore is small rural villages where nobody has a tv but there is a village computer with internet accesss. Usually set up by some Government scheme or other. I even saw this sort of thing in Iran of all places.

      --
      All generalisations are wrong... including this one.
    2. Re:I guess I am too young ... by cp99 · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to either China or India, but I have been to Vietnam (which is poorer than China and maybe India) and I got the exact opposite impression. There are TV ariels everywhere. I even have the most impressive picture of a village on the banks of the Mekong, with literally thousands of TV ariels everywhere. And as it was the world cup season when I was there, trust me, people without a tv missed it alright.

      --
      Warning: Some ideologies on the Net are smaller than they appear.
    3. Re:I guess I am too young ... by sgage · · Score: 2

      "It never occured to me that there might be a place that there *ISN'T* TV."

      There is such a place... my house :-)

    4. Re:I guess I am too young ... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      I don't watch tv either. But I do play video games. I only have cable because of my girlfriend. Odd thing is, nobody I talk to really watches much TV either. I do watch movies though :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  20. Illegality, not Legalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    It's not a case of "legalizing television". It's actually an "increase in restrictions".

    Before any laws, TV could be provided and viewed by anyone.
    If it was made illegal, people were more limited in what they could do and there were now laws which punished them if they broke the rules.
    "Legalizing television" actually means that television is now allowed but only under the laws which limit what can be done with it. More television can be sent openly, but television thus has a new set of laws which prohibit various things.

  21. I hate American TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im glad i don't live in the land of corporate fraud, Terrorism, Fat Slobs, Mcbreakfast, DMCA and Slashdot. But we still get their crap. Luckily its only CNBC.

  22. American Culture by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess there should be a distinction made between american culture and american "culture" as used by michael. Yes, you americans have a great culture; excellent writers, great artists and original musicians. Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.
    I've been reading some of the comments and all I have to say is this: don't short change yourself or your culture, be aware of the things that have real value and give these to the world.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:American Culture by Arsewiper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, what's sad is that the 'culture' is what the rest of the world subscribes to. It's market led so for people outside of the US to complain they are really complaining about the tastes of their own culture. I'm glad that the US has provided us with some excellent tv like the Simpsons and early X-Files. If I have any objection it's to the marketing of unhealthy food like McDonalds to children - that's harmful and underhand.

    2. Re:American Culture by PastorOfMuppets · · Score: 1
      The reason that we only export the crap is because that is our mainstream culture. The truth is, Americans have no appreciation for art, all they want is Mickey Mouse and Britney Spears.

      You are correct that we have some excellent writers, artists, and musicians. We also have some pretty good film makers. Unfortunately, all these things are swept under the rug and never become a part of our mainstream culture. In truth, the only real culture we have is counter-culture. If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny.

      --
      If you don't have anything nice to say, shut up you stupid prick.
    3. Re:American Culture by asreal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This reminds me of a question that came up while I was studying in the UK. My Pop Culture in Britain 1800-Present class was discussing what the term culture means. Many people were certain culture meant what was played on BBC4 and "the classics." I took another point of view. Culture is everything produced by a civilization... there is no real yardstick.

      After all, in his day, Shakespeare's plays were considered to be for the common people. I don't mean to equate The Fast and the Furious with Hamlet, but I think we are too fast to dismiss anything other than 'high culture'.

    4. Re:American Culture by lightcycler · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Also in the news yesterday: US foreign-office spamming Arab nations with USian "culture" in the form of pop music, "news" in the worst sense of the word, and plain old propoganda.

      Interesting to see how long it took the US propoganda, err. office of foriegn communications to get setup. I seem to recall a bill being passed to make it legal for them to lie in the reporting of foreign news, and to just plain make-up wire-stories in the hope that foreigners will believe them.

      So that represents exactly what americans are to the rest of the world: Frauds and Liars. Enshrined under US law.

    5. Re:American Culture by pamri · · Score: 2, Insightful
      American culture suceeds not becuase it is one of the greatest, but it's Corporations with their deep pockets have marketed it successfully. And what you are saying is very true.

      The culture that get's exported out of america is not the best, but that which thrives on popular emotions & has a transnational appeal(coke, wwf, spiderman).
      The reason WWF succeeds, say, compared to Mark Twain maybe because WWF cuts across many barriers like language, the emotions conveyed are easily decipherable & more easily understood by a villager in bhutan than say, the meaning of songs by any US folk artist(Not that other cultural aspects like the writings of Mark Twain or David Thoreau may be unrelated to people across the globe, but it's just that they don't appeal to everyone & it is not marketable, esp the Corporations).
      But, not all american culture does suceed, rather, the host country's culture or it's presentation get's a make-over(Glocalisation anyone?).eg:Switch on MTV in any country- Most of the pop song videos (their packaging) look similar, where as the folk-music that you would get, say on their PBS, would reflect the country's national ethos.

    6. Re:American Culture by gosand · · Score: 2
      Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.

      And Slashdot. Don't forget about Slashdot. :-)

      Sometimes it is really hard to be proud to be an American. We do have so many great things in this country, but we have so many things to be ashamed of. I guess it just comes with the territory. Everything seems to be a paradox. We have a great country, with so much to offer by way of music, food, wine, entertainment, fashion, culture. But we always seem to just push things a little too far. I mean, we landed on the moon for crying out loud. We send missions into space on a pretty regular basis, and it barely makes the news. But Britney Spears breaks up with her boyfriend, and I have to hear about it for weeks. There are many things that I am proud of about my country, but it is really hard sometimes to remember those things when we act so stupid. About the only thing we don't have here is a deep rooted tradition. Maybe that contributes to our culture and our "culture".

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    7. Re:American Culture by asreal · · Score: 1
      I just thought of something else that ties into my other post in this thread. Classic Greek plays and literature, Shakespearian plays, and most great literature have something in common with things like the WWF. Themes. All of them look at subjects like betrayal, love, lust, revenge, hubris, and whatnot. I really do think that when future sociologists and historians are looking at the 20th century, professional wrestling will be one of the cultural forms they consider most.

      Believe it or not, it might not reflect too badly upon us. Wrestling is crude, simplistic, highly stylized, sexist and classist, but it does mirror American society and does follow the models set by its predecessors very well.

    8. Re:American Culture by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because we are constantly told that we are evil and our culture is not actual culture. Everytime we want something for ourselves it's labeled as either: a. Stolen or b. Not actual culture. Then when we get into this mode of self loathing and self hate. We start to believe that maybe we are doing something wrong, maybe our culture is not culture at all but just stolen ideas or fluff, maybe we are evil at the root. But I fail to see how we are so different from any other culture in history.

      Britney Spears gets on the stage to entertain the masses. William Shakespeare wrote plays to entertain the masses. Yet one is placed on the pedestal of "culture" and admired, while the other is deemed fluff. The value of both art works could be argued infinitely, but my point is that we are forged from birth to be self loathing Americans and it's hard to shake that. We constantly question ourselves and our actions (that can be a good thing) to the point that it drives us mad.

      Oh well, this discussion is good but I know that I have culture. I live in the Chesapeake Bay Area of Maryland and that has basically defined my culture. I could show any outsider things that they have never seen and would enjoy that are distinctly ours just as easily as they could show me their country/culture. We are not Britney Spears, we are not Coke, we are not McDonalds.

    9. Re:American Culture by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.

      Actually, I would consider Coke to be a positive part of the American culture. What is negative about Coke? It's been around a looooong time, and people like it. One of the oldest American companies, and still successful.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:American Culture by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      Excellent point! Well said!

    11. Re:American Culture by gosand · · Score: 2
      Maybe it's because we are constantly told that we are evil and our culture is not actual culture. Everytime we want something for ourselves it's labeled as either: a. Stolen or b. Not actual culture.

      We, as a country, do evil things. Most countries do. We also do good things. Most countries do.

      I think part of the problem is the unwashed masses completely deny that the US could do anything wrong, that we are totally original, and everyone wants to be like us. These are the people that chant "USA USA USA" at everything.

      More Americans, not less, need to look at our culture and what we do objectively. I can say "Yes, we don't have the thousand-year-old traditions of some countries, and that's OK. Yes, a lot of our culture is borrowed. That's OK. We are a young nation, and we have done some things wrong, and some things right. "

      We have stolen a lot of things and called them our own. The ignorant thing is not that we have stolen an idea or two, everyone does that. It is that we claim it to be our own. That can piss people off, and rightly so. But we also have a lot of original things as well, that a lot of people around the world like. It is good to have a reality check sometimes, both the positive and the negative.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    12. Re:American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Careful, there's some laser-guided culture flying in through your window!

    13. Re:American Culture by cez · · Score: 1

      you have to admit too that mainstream american culture is child oriented...why are Disney and Britany Spears so big (sides Brit's obvious popularity with the 15-30 something single male crowd) its because of "momy, dady I want that!!! And lets goto Disney World"...each generation of americans is Focused on providing more for their children and giving them what they lacked or wished for!

      --
      Walk with Music;
    14. Re:American Culture by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 1

      I think this argument becomes one-sided very quickly. The point that seems to get neglected is that people around the world buy the stuff. Don't forget EuroDisney was oringally an idea from the French government; they asked for it.

    15. Re:American Culture by cez · · Score: 1

      We give credit where credit is do! We still call fried strips of potatos "french" fries don't we?

      --
      Walk with Music;
    16. Re:American Culture by smithmc · · Score: 1
      Too bad that the stuff that actually gets exported the most is "culture": coke, disney and the worst of hollywood.

      Um, let's turn that around: too bad the stuff that you guys import is the coke/disney/hollywood. Supply-and-demand requires not only a supply, but a demand. If people in other countries weren't willing to pay for American crap-culture, it wouldn't be there. So go out to your nearest bookstore, and buy up all the Hemingway, Faulkner, Asimov, Pirsig, Sterling, etc., that you can find, and get everyone to boycott Disney and Coke and MTV. (Hey, maybe we here in the US should try the same thing...)

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    17. Re:American Culture by mrdlinux · · Score: 1

      But they were invented in Belgium ;)

      --
      Those who do not know the past are doomed to reimplement it, poorly.
    18. Re:American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, but I don't think it is so straightforward.

      You see, the whole process goes like this: you have something, a product, something that you think will make money, call it X. You see a country with lots of loose money and some demand for the product. You advertise. You advertise so much that you it will pour out of the ears of the people. And they will buy X. It's not about wanting X or importing X, it's about it being everywhere. And it it's not too awful/annoying/against the morale, it will make people not resent it. The double-negative is the key to understanding. If you don't resent it, why not buy it when someone offers it. After all, you've nothing against it, do you?

    19. Re:American Culture by maelstrom · · Score: 2

      I like to diss Disney too, but you hafta admit some of the things they've done easily qualify as art, ever watched Fantasia?

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    20. Re:American Culture by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      IMHO I think wrestling more accurately portrays a much older theme: that of ancient Rome and the gladiatorial battles that throngs of people came to see. Only with the gladiators it was real and people actually died. And there were lions. And weapons.

      Nevermind.

    21. Re:American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one here is buying it. Why do you think its being exported?

  23. Please use google cache by shomon2 · · Score: 2

    This is a tiny country, and they don't need a slashdotting.
    http://www.google.com/search?q=+site%3Awww.bbs.com .bt+bhutan

    That might be a good enough link to use for most pages in the bhutan broadcasting service.

    1. Re:Please use google cache by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Well I guess no one is going to be using the internet in Bhutan for awhile. See, we'll help them preserve their damn culture whether they like it or not.

    2. Re:Please use google cache by arglesnaf · · Score: 1

      I was going to guess that the server itself was not in bhutan, but according to asia-pacific nic, it is... 202.144.155.2

  24. ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want to feed your culture and yet you refuse to welcome them into your country.

  25. American Culture Not That Bad by Kirby-meister · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think American culture is much better than some of the less-tolerant cultures there are in this world.

    Come on, what's so bad about our culture? Not all of us are the stereotyped fat slobs who stare at the TV all day. Our music is diverse, our people tend to work, and our culture is mostly tolerant on issues. And I like the fact that we are free to discuss issues concerning the government.

    1. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our music is diverse

      Really? Where do you hide all of this "diverse" music of yours, America? You should maybe tell someone about it all, because we're all pretty sick and fucking tired of hearing another Britney song!

      our people tend to work

      I love the use of the word "tend" in there! You should compare unemployment & working week figures with other western countries. American workers don't work as much as most of the rest of the world.

      our culture is mostly tolerant on issues

      BOO! Palestian! Northern Ireland! Abortion! Gay marriage! DRUGS! Tolerent...hah, good one.

      I like the fact that we are free to discuss issues concerning the government.

      Only as much as they'll let you. Remember the guy who filmed the cops beating up a black guy? Guess where he ended up?

      You can discuss your government just as much as anyone else can. Your constitution doesn't mean dick; Washington long ago proved that it doesn't hold any real value. All it is these days is a convenient smokescreen that they can use to distract you while they take away yet more of your cival rights.

    2. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's discuss this "Americans don't work" issue over my vacation. Let's see, I get two weeks. Can you Euros schedule that into your six-week vacation some time?

    3. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by australopithecus · · Score: 1
      oh lordy, lordy.
      I;m the most reluctant American you;ll ever meet, but dude, you are rather misinformed.lets see waht I mean:

      Where do you hide all of this "diverse" music of yours, America?
      Maybe if you listened to something else besides the radio this would become apparent. Yor comment is akin to me saying that Britain is only the Spice Girls. No need to rant on something you dont know about.


      American workers don't work as much as most of the rest of the world.
      Which is why the average paid vacation in western europe (and the U.A.E. for some reason) is five work weeks. U.S. average? two. Dont give me the whole hours per work week B.S. either, as I can tell you that a work day in Madrid is a hell of a lot easier than a work Day in New York.


      Tolerent...hah, good one.

      If i want an abortion, i can march my ass down town and get one. If i want to have a gay marraige, I can go to vermont or new mexico. If i want to claim glaucoma and smoke a fat tasty spliff, I go to Cali (id rather fly to amsterdam, but whatev). Funny that you dont realize how much of a role intolerance plays in the two international issues you addressed. If im living in Israel and Im Palestinian, you bet your ass I'll be seeing some intolerance. If im a Catholic living in the wrong Neghborhood in Belfast, you bet your ass I'll be seeing some intolerance. But if I'm any of these living in any neighborhood in the U.S. I'll bet your ass that no one will give a flying fuck.

      Only as much as they'll let you. Remember the guy who filmed the cops beating up a black guy?
      yet again, my australopithecene brain wins over your "sapien" one. the camera guy was arrested because he ahd previous charges held against him, not because he filmed the cops beating the black kid.

      A very close british friend of mine once told me that he feels very sorry for intellectual americans. I feel very sorry for you.

    4. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you listened to something else besides the radio this would become apparent.

      Really? Where? Show me, seriously. Where can I, as a poor European, find something other than the usual made up, pumped out, barly-18, RIAA shite that we are bombarded with, day in, day out?

      As it happens, I'm lucky enough to live in the UK, so I can at least choose from 4 BBC Radio stations, where we at least get hear some diverse, new and unsigned talent. Wheres yours?

      Which is why the average paid vacation in western europe (and the U.A.E. for some reason) is five work weeks. U.S. average?

      Newsflash! Europe is not a single country! I sure as fuck don't get 5 weeks of paid holiday!

      If i want an abortion, i can march my ass down town and get one. If i want to have a gay marraige, I can go to vermont or new mexico.

      Wow! Yeah, that makes you all so tolerant, doesn't it? The fact that a few states out of 50 allow a few certain things is amazing! The fact that the large majority of the populace of Vermont or New Mexico fucking hates the idea of Gay marriages doesn't make you any less tolerant as a culture at all!

      Funny that you dont realize how much of a role intolerance plays in the two international issues you addressed.

      Really? Thanks for the history lesson on NI, but I live in the UK, and I know full well what is going on. We have a fairly unbiased news coverage too, so I've seen what has happened in Palistine and Isreal. (Both of them deserve a good slapping, frankly.)

      But if I'm any of these living in any neighborhood in the U.S. I'll bet your ass that no one will give a flying fuck.

      No? What if you're an Atheist, and you don't want to pledge your alegiance to "God"? Uh oh! Atheists! Get 'em!

      A very close british friend of mine once told me that he feels very sorry for intellectual americans.

      Really? Did you ask why? I can understand his sentiments; having an IQ over 70 and being emersed in American "culture" must be like Dantes 7th Circle of Hell...

      I feel very sorry for you.

      Why? So you can dismiss me as a crank, feel sorry for me and make yourself feel better about it all? "Oh, poor dear, he doesn't know what he's saying. He's just jealous, I feel so sorry for him..."?

      Fuck America, and fuck its manufactured, self-serve, sparkly shiny things "culture" too.

    5. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Per+Wigren · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and our culture is mostly tolerant on issues.

      Yes, I've seen that on Ricky Lake and Jenny Jones. ;)

      "Oh no, you're not normal! We have to change/brainwash you so you can fit in with the rest!"

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    6. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by chefren · · Score: 1
      Where do you hide all of this "diverse" music of yours, America?

      Jazz? Blues? Soul? Country? Do any of these ring a bell?

      Palestian! Northern Ireland! Abortion! Gay marriage! DRUGS! Tolerent...hah, good one.

      I'll agree with this one. Just because other cultures aren't tolerant towards you, doesn't mean your intolerance toward them are excused. Not that this makes USA any less tolerant than other countries, just more on the same level, but about different things.

      Your constitution doesn't mean dick

      Even the bible doesn't mean dick if no-one follows it.

      The thing I'm afraid of is that american companies and globalisation will normalize all cultures to death. The american (USA) culture is just the first to go. Video did kill the radio star (sorry 'bout that...). The rest of us are next, unless we fight back. Not by laws but by actively supporting our own cultures.

    7. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Our music is diverse

      Only if you know where to look. Remember, before the internet, the same crap you hear on all of the current Clear Channel radio stations was the majority1 of what would make it to other countries.

      our people tend to work

      True, but we seem to be prejudiced against rest and relaxation of any sort. What ever happened to enjoying life? What's the big deal if you die a "successful" millionaire if you Can't Take it With You"TM?

      My roommate from England tells me about how many Europeans get a month of vacation per year; they get even more (6 weeks?) if they've got some seniority. The average full-time American employee gets two weeks of vacation time per year, and those with seniority may even be lucky enough to get three! And even when we do finally get to take some down time, we still can't get some rest and relaxation without overworking ourselves.

      and our culture is mostly tolerant on issues

      More like Apathy. Passivity. Sheep-like behavior.

      There are many issues which are worth some time to consider:

      • Human rights
      • Civil rights
      • Racism
      • Affirmative Action
      • Funding education
      • Arms control
      • Campaign finance
      • Missile defense
      • Immigration
      • The USA PATRIOT ACT, UCITA, DMCA, etc
      • The corruption of mainstream media
      • Medicare/Medicaid
      • AIDS
      • Drug patents
      • Disabled rights
      • Juvenile justice
      • Conflicts in Africa
      • The cause of poverty
      • Third World Debt
      • Free trade and globalization
      • Creeping corporate power
      • Consumerism
      • International criminal court
      • The Middle East
      • The War on TerrorTM
      • Foreign Policy
      • Israel and Palestine
      • Kosovo
      • Chechnya
      • East Timor
      • China
      • Genetically modified food
      • Global Warming
      • Animal/Nature conservation
      • Human cloning
      • Prayer in school
      • Gun control
      • Patient rights
      • Euthanasia
      • Privacy
      • Terrorism
      • Tobacco
      • Health Care
      • United Nations
      • Veterans
      • Tort Reform
      • Separation of church and state
      • Bill of Rights
      (just to name a few)

      At least some of these issues should be things people talk about and think about every day, instead of going home to be brainwashed by MTV or the latest episode of Friends (aka "culture"). I know there *are* people in the USA who do stay on top of the issues, but for the most part, people prefer to stick their heads in the ground and be apathetic (aka "tolerant") of how everything is going now. Honestly, do you think our leaders are going to make the right decisions?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    8. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by joshua404 · · Score: 1

      I suppose you also believe that professional wrestling is real.

    9. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If i want an abortion, i can march my ass down town and get one.

      Yeah, right past the "tolerant" americans holding their picket signs, their list from the Nuremberg Files, and their tote bag full of weapons which has "choose life" printed on the outside.

      if i want to have a gay marraige, I can go to vermont or new mexico.

      We're so "tolerant" that 4% of our state governments allow gay marriage. And then there's always the issue of dealing with our "tolerant" neo-nazis, Aaron McKinneys, and "tolerant" churches and conservative groups?

      if i want to claim glaucoma and smoke a fat tasty spliff, I go to Cali (id rather fly to amsterdam, but whatev).

      I'll agree a lot of people are tolerant to light drug use, but my problem with it is that as long as it's widespread and illegal, it makes a lot of people arrestable for something the majority of the public accepts.

      Funny that you dont realize how much of a role intolerance plays in the two international issues you addressed. If im living in Israel and Im Palestinian, you bet your ass I'll be seeing some intolerance. If im a Catholic living in the wrong Neghborhood in Belfast, you bet your ass I'll be seeing some intolerance. But if I'm any of these living in any neighborhood in the U.S. I'll bet your ass that no one will give a flying fuck.

      You're mostly correct as far as extent, but your colorfully metaphored assertion that there is complete racial apathy here in the USA is a little bit inaccurate. For example, what about a black family living in an all-white community in a southern state, or a young married couple moving into a community of mostly retirees? While in most cases, we've reached the point where physical violence is rare between these groups, there is certianly at least a small degree of intolerance.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    10. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, right past the "tolerant" americans holding their picket signs, their list from the Nuremberg Files, and their tote bag full of weapons which has "choose life" printed on the outside. We're so "tolerant" that 4% of our state governments allow gay marriage. And then there's always the issue of dealing with our "tolerant" neo-nazis, Aaron McKinneys, and "tolerant" churches and conservative groups? For example, what about a black family living in an all-white community in a southern state

      And then there are those ignorant people who stereotype all pro-lifers as violent abortion clinic-bombers, evangelical churches as neo-nazi gay bashers, and white southerns as racists.

      Brian Ellenberger
    11. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2

      It was (mostly) a joke, get over it.. :)

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    12. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell do Americans take pride in working their asses for most of their adult lives for some corporate goliath that doesnt give 2 shits about them. Do you really think that you will be sitting on your deathbead and the thought of I worked for *insert workplace name here* for 45 years, and only vacationed for for 6 months to a year in that time. I bet my wife and kids are so proud of me. I even took my kids fishin once!!!! I can die a happy man now. Come on, wake up and smell what your shovelin. Its nothing to brag about.

    13. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by motardo · · Score: 1
      For example, what about a black family living in an all-white community in a southern state, or a young married couple moving into a community of mostly retirees?

      Gotta watch out for those highly dangerous retirees

    14. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by skhisma · · Score: 1

      As it happens, I'm lucky enough to live in the UK, so I can at least choose from 4 BBC Radio stations, where we at least get hear some diverse, new and unsigned talent. Wheres yours?

      our radio sucks. there's no two ways about it. but we do have plenty of "new and unsigned talent" and even a lot of our signed talent is pretty good. there are plenty of music labels that aren't evil (yet).

      What if you're an Atheist, and you don't want to pledge your allegiance to "God"? Uh oh! Atheists! Get 'em!

      i agree, america is very stupid when it comes to religion. (and for some reason people seem to think that the whole "under god" thing has been around since 1776... which, of course, it hasn't).

      i guess i'd have to agree with you (and the other's here) who complain about america's tolerance... but this got started as a discussion on culture, which i feel we do have a good deal of.

    15. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right past the "tolerant" americans holding their picket signs, their list from the Nuremberg Files, and their tote bag full of weapons which has "choose life" printed on the outside.

      That's right, expressing their opinion. Your right to have an abortion is still legal as is their right to protest it.

      Sounds like you're all for tolerance, as long as it's something you're in favor of and anyone who disagrees can get the fuck out. Brilliant.

    16. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      And then there are those ignorant people who stereotype all pro-lifers as violent abortion clinic-bombers, evangelical churches as neo-nazi gay bashers, and white southerns as racists.
      Brian Ellenberger


      And then there are the insightful Rest of Us who know that any group has diverse members, some good, some bad, but are also aware that none of the Pro Choice people are running around murdering others for their political views or the medicine they practice. While not all anti-abortionists are gun wielding radicals, clearly that group attracts enough such individuals that doctor shootings, bombing, and political websites lauding such atrocities are relatively commonplace, in stark contrast to the civil, non-violent activists on the other side of that particular issue.

      Religion breeds intolerance not because of its belief in a God, however erroneous such a belief may be. It breeds intolerance by its very assertion that it has the "one true, straight and narrow way" to God, setting its people apart from the rest of the world. With that sort of foundation, is it really any wonder so many variations on that theme breed incredible levels of intolerance for the beliefs of others, or that those who are to some degree tolerant (at least until their core beliefs are challenged) tend to be moreso as a result of conscious choice, rather than as a natural extention of their belief system?

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    17. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by AmInParis · · Score: 0
      Really? Where do you hide all of this "diverse" music of yours, America? You should maybe tell someone about it all, because we're all pretty sick and fucking tired of hearing another Britney song!

      Oh, you mean like how we are also tired of another S Club 7 (UK) or Daft Punk (France) song? Face it. Every country has groups that pump that shit out. Why? Because it sells!

    18. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee whiz, what a shame that there are Americans who don't agree with your beliefs. Imagine the nerve of those people actually PROTESTING!!!

      Now you know how it feels to be a Catholic, or a target shooter, or a Republican, or straight, or White, or male, or...

      Get the picture, idiot? Americans are free to not agree, and some of them don't agree with YOU. Tough shit kid.

      God did not make the sun shine out of your ass. You might want to examine some of your strongly held beliefs to see why people are picketing in protest.

    19. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by AmInParis · · Score: 0
      Sounds like you're all for tolerance, as long as it's something you're in favor of and anyone who disagrees can get the fuck out. Brilliant.

      You think other so-called "tolerant" nations don't pull a lot of stupid stunts?

      I have an American friend in France who is applying for a resident permit. Her name doesn't exist in the French language so they select the "next closest" name. Further, even though she has always used her maiden name, they are forcing her to use her married name.

      In Austria, parents aren't allowed to invent names and must proved a name once belonged to a real person.

      These may sound trivial and silly but they are still examples of stupid intolerance.

    20. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by cez · · Score: 1

      Music Please...maybe if you got your ass up and bought a cd you could choose something other than Britany Spears...I prefer Method Man...I'll show you some real shaolin style mofo...or how Oboot some BIGGIE or Sublime or Rusted Root...maybe you prefer some Johny Cage and as far as work goes...work smarter not harder.

      --
      Walk with Music;
    21. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by cez · · Score: 1

      Don't give a shit? The company I work for gave $20,000 to the families of any employee who had any relative who died on 9/11 on top of the mass amounts given to regular charities

      --
      Walk with Music;
    22. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Spectra72 · · Score: 2

      Commonplace?? Killing abortion doctors is commonplace? Abortion clinic bombings are commonplace? Do you have your VCR set on repeat or something?

      These events, while tragic, are definitely NOT commonplace. The famous Nuremburg Files website case was declared a "true threat" and not protected by the First Amendment in Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette v. American Coalition of Life Activists. The last documented case of an abortion doctor being murdered was in 1998, the last attempted murder was in 1999. There have been three bombings or bombing attempts since 1999. Hardly qualifying as "commonplace".


      Info

      You should look into ratcheting down the rhetoric.

    23. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by DaveWhite99 · · Score: 1

      Europeans get a month of vacation per year; they get even more (6 weeks?) if they've got some seniority. Yeah, that's for the Europeans that HAVE jobs. Ever wonder why the European unemployment rate is so high ? European labor is just too expensive. I'll take my 2-week-vacation U.S. job any day over being unemployed, thank you very much.

      --
      Biodiesel : domestic, renewable, clean, and in the fuel tank of my bone stock 2002 New Beetle TDI
    24. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Fuck America, and fuck its manufactured, self-serve, sparkly shiny things "culture" too."

      Strong words coming from a citizen of the country that gave us the Spice Girls. Way to go Brit high culture! From a country that, if possible, places even more emphasis on celebrity and paparazzi culture than the US.

      When you wake every single day and remember that your country is considered the lapdog of the US by most of the world, including the US, how does that make you feel?

    25. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Gotta watch out for those highly dangerous retirees

      You obviously don't live in Boca Raton. I do. ;-)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    26. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Your right to have an abortion is still legal as is their right to protest it.

      Sounds like you're all for tolerance, as long as it's something you're in favor of and anyone who disagrees can get the fuck out. Brilliant.

      A woman's right to have an abortion is still legal as is other people's right to protest it, and my right to protest the protestors, and your right to protest my protest, and now my right to protest your protest with a metametametameta protest.

      Now feel free to followup with your metametametametameta protest, but don't expect me to do this forever.

      Brilliant? Yes. So there ;-P

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    27. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For example, what about a black family living in an all-white community in a southern state, or a young married couple moving into a community of mostly retirees? While in most cases, we've reached the point where physical violence is rare between these groups, there is certianly at least a small degree of intolerance.


      It goes deeper than that, even. I live in a community that has one big employer (think "military base") that hasn't been hiring until recently. This results in the population consisting mostly of very conservative, very old people. It's a "great place to raise a family" but stinks if you're single or under 30 (or both). This town will *never* see a nightclub. Do you know why? Not because it wouldn't be profitable (the employer mentioned above is now hiring LOTS of young recent college grads), but because of the entrenched population that would like to see this town turned into a quaint little retirement community.

    28. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there are the insightful Rest of Us who know that any group has diverse members, some good, some bad, but are also aware that none of the Pro Choice people are running around murdering others for their political views or the medicine they practice.
      ---->

      Funny, actually, they do. At least in the oppinion of most pro-lifers. Even the radicals who are shooting them think they're just giving them the death penalty, rather than murdering them. *ahem* I don't exactly like the death penalty either ... being pro LIFE ... *ahem*

      ---->
      While not all anti-abortionists are gun wielding radicals, clearly that group attracts enough such individuals that doctor shootings, bombing, and political websites lauding such atrocities are relatively commonplace, in stark contrast to the civil, non-violent activists on the other side of that particular issue.
      ---->

      That's like saying that those American revolutionaries are the bad guys because they're the only ones breaking the (unjust) laws... Moreover, exactly how many abortion-related murders have their been exactly? I don't remember too darn many. Yet those are used to take away the 1st ammendment right of protest from anyone who disagrees with abortion! How can *that* be good???

      ---->
      Religion breeds intolerance not because of its belief in a God, however erroneous such a belief may be. It breeds intolerance by its very assertion that it has the "one true, straight and narrow way" to God, setting its people apart from the rest of the world.
      ---->

      1) By "religion" you apparently mean Christianity. Those statements express a profound ignorance of any other non-Abrahamic religion...

      2) That ain't necessarily so. I seem to remember both the atheistic China (wherein only those who are members of the Communist party, membership in which is officially incompatible with religion, may hold any non-local office) and Russia (think Stalinism) are responsible for quite a few atrocities. Heck, I can even link them to one thing we both probably hate: fascism. So your "religion"/Christinaity == intolerance is just an example of an old fallacy. Namely, that correlation is NOT causation.

      ---->
      With that sort of foundation, is it really any wonder so many variations on that theme breed incredible levels of intolerance for the beliefs of others, or that those who are to some degree tolerant (at least until their core beliefs are challenged) tend to be moreso as a result of conscious choice, rather than as a natural extention of their belief system?
      ---->

      Tolerant of what? That's the next question. What system of ethics should the state priviledge? None? How then can we have any laws or keep order in society? Before you answer with "libertarianism" (or your own pet ethical system) remember that even libertarianism is an ethical system! The only thing it considers wrong is taking away individual liberties. In other words, answering that question begs it :) Food for thought; you seem to need to think this stuff through just a bit more...

    29. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

      Although I agree with you the American culture is far more diverse than advertised, the problem here is that the bits of our culture that make it across the border are overwhelmingly backed by Time-Warner and other media conglomerates. In other words, your average 3rd world country (and most of the 2nd and 1st ones, actually) only see the *marketable* side of our culture. Denim jeans and McDonalds and the like -- cultural artefacts and institutions that sell.

      It's sad, really, but it works both ways. Yesterday on NPR there was an article about movies from India - so-called "Baliwood" - the announcer noted that the cinematic output of India was something like 300 movies a year, and that they were all action-packed and strongly dependant on musical numbers and outlandish plot devices. It was pretty snide, as the implication was that these movies were somehow completely inferior to the summer lacklusters we're used to in the USA.

      Bah. Bah on all of them.
      GMFTatsujin

    30. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Kirby-meister · · Score: 2
      Where do you hide all of this "diverse" music of yours, America?

      We hide them in the local Sam Goody's and from the RIAA on P2P networks.

      I love the use of the word "tend" in there! You should compare unemployment & working week figures with other western countries. American workers don't work as much as most of the rest of the world.

      You mean western like Spain, where vacations are a lot longer than American vacations?

      BOO! Palestian! Northern Ireland! Abortion! Gay marriage! DRUGS! Tolerent...hah, good one.

      "BOO! Different colored skins! Different cultures! Different religions!" Believe it or not, some parts of Europe still acts like that.

      Only as much as they'll let you. Remember the guy who filmed the cops beating up a black guy? Guess where he ended up?

      In prison, on earlier charges. Compare that to even Canada, where filming the police is illegal (or so I've been told).

      You say a lot of things but you don't seem to give reasons behind them. Our constitution is very important in our freedoms. Washington DC is not the only place where the Constitution is interpreted. And our civil rights are at a level that half the world's population never get to reach.

    31. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Always remember this: The opposite of "pro-choice" is not "pro-life." It is "anti-choice."

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    32. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are in fact several reasonable ethical arguments for restricting abortion in many circumstances.

      The ethical arguments for abortion are not particularly convincing; most that I have encountered, while it is clear what they imply about abortion, for a person to consistently take the stance on the grounds of such arguments they would also be compelled to hold views that the great majority of people take to be patently absurd.

    33. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by amchugh · · Score: 1

      And then there are the insightful Rest of Us who know that any group has diverse members, some good, some bad, but are also aware that none of the Pro Choice people are running around murdering others for their political views or the medicine they practice.

      Or, according to the Anti-choice crowd, everyone in the Pro Choice movement is running around murdering others (fetuses).

    34. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by miljam · · Score: 0

      You have absolutely NO idea how much GREAT music there is in this country. I'm willing to bet that there are more small record companies in any single state here in the US than you can even imagine, putting out music by some seriously talent people. Unfortunately (or fortunately), the great music in this country is looked over by the major corps. Your post just shows how shallow and corporate minded your take on this issue is.

    35. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      First, let me say that I am generally against abortions. Perhaps there are reasons for abortions under certain circumstances, but surely that doesn't mean that all abortions are ethical and should be lawful, but this is a digression to what I want to say.

      And to avoid any sort of ad hominem attacks, I'll say that I am an atheist. But I am not politically active.

      "Religion breeds intolerance not because of its belief in a God, however erroneous such a belief may be. It breeds intolerance by its very assertion that it has the 'one true, straight and narrow way' to God, setting its people apart from the rest of the world."

      This may be your belief, but it is certainly not mine. There is, perhaps, a One True Way. Relativism simply doesn't hold to reason. I won't digress into my reasons though.

      But the difference between people of religious zeal and others who do, in fact, believe in a One True Way is a lack of humility. While complete humility of one's beliefs is almost impossible, it is essential to be humble enough to know that even if you believe there is a One True Way, you aren't completely sure what it is. It is better, IMHO, to pretend to be Socrates and be wise simply by admitting to knowing nothing. That is true wisdom.

      So if you want to argue about the ethics of abortion, you must argue it rationally. There IS a single correct answer to this ethical problem. We just have to find it.

      As far as tolerance of beliefs goes, you must not be completely tolerant. Most people use such a politically loaded word as "tolerance" as a boolean value. Its not and it mustn't be. I have no tolerance for religious jihad's or international terrorism, no matter what belief system they are rationalized by.

      My level of tolerance is what I would call Americanized beliefs. This goes right back to the subject line of this thread, but we Americans are for the most part able to live with other Americans with quite a diversity of beliefs. We have Muslims living in our country who don't seem so interested in attacking countries who aren't theocracies. Black people and women have all the legal rights the rest of us do. We have Christians who aren't hanging witches and seem to have a good amount of tolerance for homosexuals.

      So Americanization changes people's beliefs to be compatible with each other.

      This, I believe, is a good thing.

    36. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post just shows how shallow and corporate minded your take on this issue is.

      Shit, gee, I wonder why that is?

    37. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by spruce · · Score: 1

      What ever happened to enjoying life?

      Why don't you take a little of your own advice?

      Not everybody wants to save the world, some people just want to live in it. It's messed up, and if you want to try to fix it feel free and I solute you. But don't take the elitist attitude that those are the things people *should* be thinking about. People *should* be thinking about whatever the hell they want to, and if that means working 8 hrs a day and then watching some TV when you get done then that's perfectly fine. After all, what What's the big deal if you die having changed the world if you Can't Take it With You"TM?

    38. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by spruce · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on many points but one things intrigues me, and for context I'm agnostic and I don't believe we'll ever know the one true way.

      Relativism simply doesn't hold to reason. I won't digress into my reasons though.

      This intrigues me. How can there be one true way if there is no one true being? What is used to determine truth?

    39. Re:American Culture Not That Bad by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      "What is used to determine truth?"

      I don't know. In some ways, determining truth is impossible. Like how do you know you're not the star in The Truman Show or trapped in the Matrix? But just because it may be impossible to tell what truth is doesn't mean they are all true to each individual, as is the meaning of relativism. And given that some truths may be impossible to know, what benefit do our beliefs grant us?

  26. Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Zarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just like I've seen the culture of a small Alaskan village cease due to the introduction of T.V. So will the culture of Bhutan. This letter to the editor is very convincing on that point.

    When I was young, we were Alaskans. We had our own culture and music both the old (native alaskans) and the new Russians and Americans had forged a unique identity that was Alaskan. Then TV came. By the time I left High School you could see the changes.

    My point is well illustrated by this story:
    I graduated high school in 1992, the kids from our class did the Christmas dance theme on some cute "Stairway to Heaven" or other schmaltzy thing. The kids that were class of 1994 did "Christmas in da 'Hood". The '94 kids had gang violence in their classrooms. Kids bringing guns to school (with the intent of shooting other kids and not to show off their new hunting rifle), weapons, and grafiti became problems.

    The ironic thing was that the younger classes were smaller ours was the largest graduating class.

    I remember all the Rappers and the oppressed gansta' types sulking about the remote and wild wilderness of one of the remotest places on earth. Some people run away to the untouched beauty of Alaska to escape inner-city grime. How ironic that an aspiring young rap-star would be cursed with living in a place where there was hardly any crime and the government paid you to live there.

    If religion is the opiate of the masses, then television is the crystal-meth of the glue huffing, crack-smoking, I-got-the-munchies masses.

    --
    [signature]
    1. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Zarf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not that it's a bad thing ofcourse. A single world-culture and a single world language would be good for trade. I still own a TV and I watch it BTW and I think that a strong mind can use TV rather than be used by it.

      I just don't hold any illusions that you can preserve a local culture under the constant wash of TV. It just is as it is. TV's unblinking eye serves us well in many ways. As it connects it also provides a common experience to all who are watching, the common experience causes common culture. Just how GNU/Linux has a culture formed about it, and TV shows tend to spawn sub-cultures too (ie: Star Trek, Star Wars, et al.).

      So maybe I'm being a bit harsh with my last post. Still, it is sad to see the end of a culture. Just like it was sad to see the end of Amiga, OS2, or Novell.

      --
      [signature]
    2. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nice cloaked racism there.

      Alaska is as lily-white as a KKK rally.

    3. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would genuinely like to know... what was racist in that post?

    4. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The southern part of continental Alaska is "lily-white." The Aleutian islands (wonder who those are named for?) and northern Alaska are as brown as the shit you are full of.

    5. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      OS/2 was the effort by IBM to recapture and control the destiny of the PC. You're probably only old enough to know OS/2 as the 'superior, heroic attempt to thwart Windows.'

      Believe me, when OS/2 v1 came out, with the Microchannel buss, all the 'hackers' on PC's (as opposed to the rich-kid hackers on college campuses with their Sun boxes) opposed it. It represented the closing of the wide-open MS-DOS frontier.

      Calling Novell 'the good old days...' eeek. Not even going to go there. You seem to be saying anything not-Microsoft was once cool.

    6. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Zarf · · Score: 1

      Actually I was attempting to be snide... but I suppose it didn't work.

      --
      [signature]
    7. Re:Bhutanese Culture will cease to exist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I too grew up in Alaska, (Point Barrow, the furthest point north in the US), and even in the early 80's the 'new' culture was upon us. Granted, it was a strange, not quite the same kind of environment, but we had satellite, city buses, pretty much everything except some things (like linked plumbing, but tht's a different story) and I didn't turn into a street thug. Everybody likes the 'good old days', whatever that means. The past is always rose-colored.

      Of course, I also lived in Selawik, Anchorage, and a few other villages due to crazy work habits.

      The biggest change in the past 20-30 years in AK was the introduction of sugary candies and alcohol, which made quite a few toothless drunks in the city.

  27. Forget about TV... by Toasty16 · · Score: 1
    The Evil Empire will corrupt those poor Bhutanese (Bhutani? Bhutanian?) souls with a localized version of Windows, according to the Register:

    http://www.theregus.com/content/4/25869.html

    On the other hand, this could help create a new kind of white hats: Buddhist hackers!

    1. Re:Forget about TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, this could help create a new kind of white hats: Buddhist hackers!

      ... orange hats.
  28. Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Flounder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After realizing that I never watched TV anyway, and the kids were watching too much, I disconnected the cable.

    Got internet for news, info, and entertainment. The kids now spend more time playing outside and reading. The only thing I really miss is sports (no big deal, as I hate all the local teams here in Maryland) and 24hr news (at least have the net).

    Still have the TV (gotta watch DVDs and the kids still have the kiddie movies). But it mostly stays off now. It's nice.

    Granted, instead of spending $40 a month on cable, I'm spending $100+ a month on DVDs.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Zarf · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good compromise to me. You still get the entertainment value of TV with none of the commercials. Good for you! I just might try it myself.

      --
      [signature]
    2. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just gave up on TV altogether. Mine broke and I never got a replacement. If a movie really looks worth watching, I'll go see it on a big screen in a theater. Otherwise it probably isn't worth my time.

    3. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, nuts? $100/month for DVDs? Get netflix! It's only $20/month and you can have 3 DVDs out at a time. Postage paid mailing labels make getting/returning them easy and now they have a distribution center in the East so they get to you even faster.

      I've really liked the service so far.

    4. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by pointandlaff · · Score: 1

      screw that crap, altho netflix is a good deal, go to your local library, mine has a large, and rapidly growing, collection of VHS and DVD movies, many of which are brand new (meaning, not just the "chitty-chitty-bang-bang" era)and they're FREE!! I'm sure your kids could find stuff to watch, as could you, sometimes the art films that the library will pick up are better than what you'll see in the local theater anyway :)

    5. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* I disconnected the cable....The kids now spend more time playing outside and reading. *)

      Younger kids who cannot really read yet can be a pain in the bleep, and the TV seems to be the only thing that calms them down at times.

      True, if you interacted with them, they would probably mellow a bit also.

      However, it takes a lot of discipline for me to play butterfly for 2 hours. After a while you say to yourself, "I'm turning into another F__ Barney!" and turn on the tube for the brats.

    6. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2

      I haven't watched TV -- except, I must confess, for four seasons of The X Files -- since 1990. I don't miss it. When I do have occasion to be near a TV, I have the same feeling I had hanging out with stoners after I had quit smoking pot: man, was I really that stupid?

      The only problem I have is that my coworkers and many of my casual acquaintances use TV as the same kind of common cultural touchstone as previous generations did with art and literature. I remember this was particularly annoying while Seinfeld was on the air. But even then, someone usually recited the entire plot and most of the dialogue, thereby relieving me of the need to actually watch, for example, the "Soup Nazi" episode.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    7. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Flounder · · Score: 2

      You'd be amazed at how much quicker your kids learn to read when they're not watching TV all day. I speak from personnal experience.

      I've got three boys. Twin 5 year olds, and a 2 year old. The twins started learning to read when they were 3. Once the TV went off permanently, their reading skills shot through the roof. I actually caught one of my five year olds reading my copy of Lord of the Rings. LOTR!! That in itself is worth not having cable TV. The 2 year old is even picking up on the reading now.

      I have learned this in the last few months. Thousands of generations of children were raised to be intelligent successful adults without TV. Why do our kids need it now??

      The kids do get the occasional movie on video if they have earned it through helping around the house and generally being very well behaved.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    8. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by Flounder · · Score: 2

      Several people have mentioned NetFlix instead of my $100/mo DVD habit. I also have that, I use it for movies I've never seen before. However, alot of movies I want to permanently have.

      Besides, with all of the box sets coming out, $100/mo really isn't much. Hell, it's not even the 10th and I'm already almost to my $100 limit.

      LOTR Widescreen
      Simpsons Season 2 Box
      SuperTroopers
      Blackhawk Down
      Dogma
      Vulgar

      Some months are going to kill me, like Nov of this year. LOTR:FOTR Platinum, Star Wars Ep3, Spiderman, Band of Brothers box set

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    9. Re:Nothing on TV, and you still pay for it?? by spruce · · Score: 1

      Get off your high horse. You're not a better person because you quite smoking weed and don't watch t.v. You're a different person, that's all. If you're happy, great. But don't point your finger at people and insult them.

  29. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Simpson's...American culture

    The world council rests its case.

  30. time heals all wounds by elite+lamer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hopefully, after the novelty of television wears off, the Bhutanese people won't become as obsessed with TV as Americans are. When I was a kid, I used to wach cartoons every Saturday morning, without fail. I'm sure many other people did the same. But as I grew older, I watched TV less often, and now I only watch the news and sometimes a few programs I enjoy.

    The article made the Bhutanese people seem, to me, like America's children. But in a few years, hopefully the novelty will wear off, and Bhutan won't lose its rich culture to Sex in the City and MTV.

    Hopefully.

    --
    Oops!
    1. Re:time heals all wounds by echucker · · Score: 2

      The article made the Bhutanese people seem, to me, like America's children. But in a few years, hopefully the novelty will wear off, and Bhutan won't lose its rich culture to Sex in the City and MTV.

      By the time you stop watching, it's already too late. TV has had its effect on you during your formative years, and your adult life will be forever shaped by it.

  31. What culture?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What culture?! They have no tv!

  32. Re:Bhutan Broadcasting Services' schedule for toda by sabster · · Score: 1

    Dzongkha is the national language of Bhutan.

    --

    this is a sig.fault
  33. Bhorgtan by Zephy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "THIMPHU, Bhutan -- Microsoft's latest venture is a localized version of its dominant Windows operating system for the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan. "

    Article Here

    1. Re:Bhorgtan by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "THIMPHU, Bhutan -- Microsoft's latest venture is a localized version of its dominant Windows operating system for the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan. "

      Is there a Bhutan-localized version of Red Hat?

      That's a rhetorical question.

      Which brings me nicely to my point: it is literally impossible for a capitalist culture to force itself on another culture. Capitalists can advertise products and services for sale but cannot force anyone to buy; the only people that eat at McDonalds, drink Starbucks, watch Disney and so forth are people who want to and are willing to pay with their own money.

      If people don't want to buy, corporations will collapse and leave. The only people who complain aren't the ones freely spending their own money on what they enjoy. Rather, they are the self-proclaimed elite, those who don't offer anything that their people actually want, and can only survive where there is no competition. An example of this is the way the French taxpayer has to subsidise the production of French films, but with the money they are allowed to keep, they queue up to watch films from Hollywood.

      Imperialism is something different. Imperialism is when one country conquers another with military force, forming an empire, and imposes its culture on the conquered. Imperial means "to do with an empire". Examples of imperialism are, for example, the conquests of eastern European countries and the imposition of Communism by the Soviets.

      So I applaud the government and people of Bhutan - and the global corporations - for bringing freedom and choice to the most remote parts of the world.

    2. Re:Bhorgtan by Cyno · · Score: 1

      And I applaud your blind faith in capitalism to save the world. God bless you!

    3. Re:Bhorgtan by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      "it is literally impossible for a capitalist culture to force itself on another culture."

      Ye gods. Nice oversimplification of psychology! Nice resolute ignoring of history and current freaking events, guy. You're playing logical games- go learn about 'game theory' and get it through your head that there is such a thing as non-optimal outcomes. You're insisting on a religious faith in stuff that is not backed up by reality, and every bit of it is to defend your little axiom, that cannot be questioned, that capitalists cannot possibly influence or direct a market other than to offer goods and services.

      Post-Enron that sounds freaking insane- and that's just one side of things. People have been studying the psychological manipulation of 'consumers' (the word alone is a bias) for DECADES, how is it that you know nothing of this?

      Damn randite. "no no, there is no such thing as force unless you point a gun at somebody!" You just keep on quote "applauding global corporations" unquote and let's hope enough people notice that and recognize you for what you are. You are not the apex of enlightenment, and your opinions are not the height of wisdom. They are brainwashed foolishness.

    4. Re:Bhorgtan by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Nice resolute ignoring of history and current freaking events, guy. You're playing logical games- go learn about 'game theory' and get it through your head that there is such a thing as non-optimal outcomes. You're insisting on a religious faith in stuff that is not backed up by reality, and every bit of it is to defend your little axiom, that cannot be questioned, that capitalists cannot possibly influence or direct a market other than to offer goods and services.

      I stand by what I said. The US military can invade Iraq and install a puppet regime, but can you imagine them corralling Iraqis into line at the newly opened Baghdad McDonalds? Of course not. Now if you're saying a corporation can bribe a government into doing something, that's true. But if the government's open to bribery, then any corporation who doesn't play along is at risk from their rivals getting there first.But that's just the corporation making the best of the murky environment it finds itself in.

      Church and state were long ago separated; time for economy and state to be uncoupled also.

      Post-Enron that sounds freaking insane- and that's just one side of things. People have been studying the psychological manipulation of 'consumers' (the word alone is a bias) for DECADES, how is it that you know nothing of this?

      Yes, it's called advertising. The worst it can do to you is annoy you. It can't make you do anything you don't want to do - and that's a fact.

      And what has Enron got to do with anything? Enron is proof that the system works: they tried to break the law, they got caught, they got busted. That's the beauty of the capitalist system, if you set it up right, it's self-regulating.

  34. Even worse !! by Salsaman · · Score: 2

    As if that weren't bad enough, Bill Gates won't leave them alone either

  35. TV--the great equalizer. by quintessent · · Score: 2

    So the rich will raise children on WWF, Martha Steward, and boy bands. After a generation or so, rich IQs will be cut in half, and the poor will begin to replace them in the high-paying jobs until they too can afford TV...

    1. Re:TV--the great equalizer. by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      Ha, you actually think it is intelligence that gets people jobs? You haven't been around to much in corporate America. The best way to get a high paying job is to have Daddy (or Uncle or your wife's Daddy) get one for you.

      The only way smart people make money is go out and do it themselves.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  36. cultural memetics by shomon2 · · Score: 2

    Yes, I'm not "American" (well I am, I'm south american, but in the states people take that name to mean them. In Chile, "America" means the continent). It's not about it being right or wrong, but it's the fact that it influences other people's culture. And the point that you can then argue is wether those other cultures should survive, be preserved, or if they are subject to "survival of the fittest".

    As far as I'm concerned, one of my cultures was destroyed when the spaniards invaded northern chile and bolivia, and huge areas of that culture are now gone. But even though I've never even spent more than a couple of days in the places where my ancestors lived, I can still pick up a book or search the internet and learn about it. So yes, preserve it, but no, don't force people to keep it while they want to watch WWF, eat at McDonalds or whatever else.I don't want to impose my judgement on that. Otherwise you're teaching people to see their culture as obligatory...

    1. Re:cultural memetics by Flowers_By_Irene · · Score: 0

      I think that sometimes cultures do require and deserve a little protectionism as witnessed in the report. Despite the "benign paternalism" practised in Bhutan, 95 percent of people who travel abroad to get an education return - presumably because they like it. Is this matched anywhere on the Indian sub-continet? Ultimately cultures are vulnerable because they generally don't represent a revenue stream (unless it's Disney merchandise) so they have no lobbying influence. It's rare to see a country have so much culturally-based legislation and I think it is a good thing.

    2. Re:cultural memetics by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm not "American" (well I am, I'm south american, but in the states people take that name to mean them. In Chile, "America" means the continent).
      Its not like we are exclusive in our use of American. Other than the people in South and Central America (and Mexico) (who seem to have a complex about the term American being applied to USA citizens) the term American is used for citizens of my great country. (Side note, but do any of the other countries in the Americas have America in the actual name of their country? Remember our name is "The United States of America".... and people do like to use names that slide off the tounge. USAian, United Statesian, just don't really slide off, so they grab the last part.)

  37. Life without TV is good by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    I gave up having broadcast TV in my house 1.5 years ago, and after a short (2 month) period of missing it I now find life is so much better than it was with TV. I don't waste long hours watching stupid reruns of dumb shows (American or British - both are dumb) or worse still, infomercials. I have tons more time to spend with friends, my wife, reading, whatever. My wife spends more time doing her paintings and I spend more time studying computers and playing games (usually online). If we want some visual entertainment we go to the cinema or watch a DVD. The emphasis is on being able to enjoy the movies we want when we want, without commercials or being tied to a televison programmers schedule. Now we don't pay an average cable bill of 25GBP/month we can buy a DVD or even two instead and watch them at our leisure. Life without broadcast TV is cool, try it some time.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    1. Re:Life without TV is good by neecha · · Score: 0

      I agree to this. Unfortunately, it's time for (American) football season to start up, so I'll hook up for that and then switch it back off after the season ends.

    2. Re:Life without TV is good by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      I do, and I'm an American. I haven't had broadcast TV in my place for over eight years, and when you have 10 times the number of books as you do videos, the videos kinda sit unplayed.

      Of course, I'm one of those freaks supporting Bhutan's desire to not be Westernized, so maybe you shouldn't listen to me. Or maybe it's worth asking 'why does living that small amount more like Shangri-La lead one to understand and sympathise with them more?'

    3. Re:Life without TV is good by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      Bhutan's desire to not be Westernized

      A meaningless phrase, as only individuals can have a "desire" for anything. Presumably it is shorthand for "the desire of certain people within Bhutan to prevent anyone in the country from having the option of adopting Western ways".

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    4. Re:Life without TV is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I spend more time studying computers and playing games (usually online).

      So you swapped TV with Everquest, and your life has improved? Sounds like giving up heroin for meth.

  38. ups and downs by zephc · · Score: 2

    downsides:
    - WWE (formerly the WWF)
    - The Anna Nicole Smith Show
    - Jackass
    - Springer/Oprah/etc.
    - FOX News

    upsides:
    - Simpsons
    - Red Dwarf
    - Cartoon Network's Adult Swim
    - MST3K

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:ups and downs by The+Purple+Wizard · · Score: 1
      You forgot a few:-

      downsides: - WWE (formerly the WWF)

      - The Anna Nicole Smith Show

      - Jackass

      - Springer/Oprah/etc.

      - FOX News

      - Windows

      upsides:

      - Simpsons

      - Red Dwarf

      - Cartoon Network's Adult Swim

      - MST3K

      - Linux

      There, that should work wonders for my karma...

    2. Re:ups and downs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Red Dwarf

      dont you f'#kin dare claim that as american

    3. Re:ups and downs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err,
      Linux is European.
      Red Dwarf is made by the BBC (UK)

      Don't you know what is made by Americans and the rest of the World?

    4. Re:ups and downs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They re-made Red Dwarf for american TV also, but it was fucking dire.

    5. Re:ups and downs by zephc · · Score: 2

      yes yes i KNOW red dwarf is from the UK, I'm just using it as an example of good, innovative TV. This is a list of TV in general that I like (and dislike), not strictly American TV *sigh*

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    6. Re:ups and downs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that Linux has no nationality.

      RMS is American. Linus is Finnish. Alan Cox is Welsh. People from all over the world contribute to free software projects. I've seen every domain from .uk to .lt on Linux-related development lists.

  39. Thanks for making the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You jackass.

    You can be a slack-assed, don't wanna work, socialist but hey, don't be so down on yourself. You can blame the Americans!

    This is exactly the problem. You and your fellow countrymen have no understanding of other cultures, you don't want to have any understanding of other cultures, and you will never have an understanding of other cultures. Hey, they don't like America?! They must be socialists! Like you have any idea what Socialism is (Hint: Not your McCarthyist, Red Baiting, Commie-Under-The-Table American view of Socialism). Like you have any idea of why American Imperalism is bad. All you care about is money, and making the rest of the world as much like America as you can so that you don't have to concern yourself with that whole pesky "other cultures" thing.

    The reason America bashing is "chic" is because of your and your fellow countrymans ignorance, self centeredness and introspectiveness. Wake up! The world exists outside of the US of A, and its different! Stop trying to make us like you!

    1. Re:Thanks for making the point by AmInParis · · Score: 0
      They must be socialists! Like you have any idea what Socialism is

      I'm assuming you didn't understand my username. I am in Paris! I have a great idea what socialism is from the textbook description and I see how France is bleeding to death with socialistic programs. BTW, perhaps you don't keep up with politics either but in France, the socialist party shared control with Chirac until the last elections. In other words, they WERE SOCIALISTS!

      I realize that English may not be your first language so I will refrain from bashing you for it but "introspection" is a good thing. Perhaps you meant ethnocentric?



      I will agree that perhaps I am blinded by American views just as you are from yours (what ever country ACs come from). However, what you fail to see is that I don't have to make make you like me. You lap it up. You lap it up because you want it and it's addictive.

    2. Re:Thanks for making the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, how can I say moron politely.....
      I would guess that there is an extremely small percentage of americans that want to make the rest of the world "American" and I'm sure most had no say on whether Buddhist Bhutan got TV or not. .. And to make the broad statement that TV is solely American is, how can I say this politely ... incorrect. Also, making the broad statement that "You and your fellow countrymen", with "You" referring to the previous writer and "Your fellow countrymen" referring to me and everyone else living in this land, "have no understanding of other cultures" is just incorrect. I think you are confusing American politics with American culture, and yes there is a bit of culture here, look into some of the musicians that came from my hometown, new orleans.
      I will end this horribly written counterpoint by saying that for the vast majority of people I have met around the world, I would hate for them to be like me because .. thats just not very interesting, but in your case, I would prefer that you were a bit less judgemental. I really hope you dont make such large generalizations about other cultures.
      have a good day (or night)

  40. Would you like to by an Atlas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you Euros...

    Who are the "Euros"? Last time I checked, a Euro was a currency used in the majority of the countries which are part of the European Union?

    Europe isn't a single country, any more than the USA is a single "state", you dolt. Six weeks holiday a year? Yeah, I fucking wish. Britian, for example, has the highest working week of any European country, and easily "beats" the US, too. France, on the other hand, has one of the shortest working weeks, and workers also tend to have a large number of holidays.

    You ignorant fuck stick.

    1. Re:Would you like to by an Atlas? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Just answer the man's question and try to avoid the epithets.

      But before you do, check out a story on the cover of today's (8/8) Wall Street Journal. That writer has already done the research -- for just about all the European countries -- and the numbers show that by no stretch of the imagination does the average Western European work nearly as much as the average American. It is so extreme that this "leisure culture" (which has only been in effect since the 1970's, apparently) is threatening Europe's ability to compete in the global economy. The article cites a number of companies who, rather than open new factories locally, have done so in places like Brazil and South Africa.

      If someone wants to argue, on, say, a philosophical level, that it is better for us as a species to have more leisure, or that Europeans have a "better" culture than Americans becasue they work less, that's a valid debate.

      But it is indisputable that, on the average, across the year, Americans work much harder than their European counterparts and that the American economy has been better as a result of it.

      No worries, though, mate: The article also went into some detail about how various Europeans governments and unions, having recognized the problem, are in the process of reversing laws and policies gone awry post WWII. Y'all gonna be slaving away and keeping pace with Uncle Sam again real soon!

    2. Re:Would you like to by an Atlas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. If Americans worked hard they would be thinner...

    3. Re:Would you like to by an Atlas? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Pfft. And if Europeans wanted to be appear more cultured, they would bathe more regularly.

      See? I can advance negative stereotypes as well as anyone. It's pretty cowardly, makes me look like a fourteen year old, and accomplishes nothing of value, but I can do it.

      Stick to the topic, back up your views with some numbers, or give it a rest, mate. You'll find the tolerance level for prejudice pretty low on this board, among US and non-US posters alike.

    4. Re:Would you like to by an Atlas? by SweetCyanide · · Score: 1

      You'll find the tolerance level for prejudice pretty low on this board

      and yet there is so much of it. I mean, really there is.

    5. Re:Would you like to by an Atlas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You'll find the tolerance level for prejudice pretty low on this board...

      I think the tolerance level for practically ANYTHING is pretty low on this board!

  41. Read Kuensel by rpjs · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want a glimpse of Bhutan, read their national newspaper Kuensel on the web. It's in English and it gives a fascinating insight into a country that's still trying to take on the modern world on its own terms.

    And it uses Slash.

    1. Re:Read Kuensel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very interesting, I shall have to take the time to read some more :) However

      And it uses Slash

      It doesn't : META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="PHP-Nuke 5.3.1 - http://phpnuke.org"

      They havn't changed the Meta Content tags, either, so they still have "Geek", "Free Software", "Unix" etc. in there :)

    2. Re:Read Kuensel by rpjs · · Score: 1

      OK, it used to use Slash, or so I recall.

      or maybe it was a figment of my deranged imagination.

  42. WWF by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's good to see that the people of Bhutan keep up with there budist nature and look after pandas and the wildlife...

    didn't you mean WWE

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  43. Supermarkets and Swatchs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Recently, I had the oppurtunity to trek through three countries, Singapore, India and Switzerland. A few fascinating things I encountered:-
    a)You get *authentic* Swiss chocolates in *all* countries.
    b) Swatch watches are actually cheaper in Singapore.
    c) It becomes depressing after a while, but supermarkets in *all* countries feature the same ice-cream brands (Nestle, Walls etc).
    d) In Singapore (and to a large extent India as well), most of the costlier houses feature Swiss architecture. No, don't look at me, I really can't figure it out. Houses in Bukit Timah Road (in Singapore), Colaba in Bombay (India) and in Zurich seem exactly the same; the same sloping roofs, the same tiles and the same cars (Suzuki Altos, Toyotas, Pegueots).
    e) Thanks to Ikea (apparently), beanbags are now a constant feature in middle-class houses all over.
    f) Most Indian movies are shot in Switzerland.
    g) Singapore's largest theater features Hindi movies only.

    Now, what was that again about American softpower...?

    1. Re:Supermarkets and Swatchs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the things you list are just as bad as any American influence on other cultures. The reason that America is picked on, though, is simply because America and American companies are the most prolific, and therefore they are they worst "offenders" of cultural imperialism.

  44. Clasification for Bhutan by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    pure and uncorrupt, just like a lot of africa etc ..... a hundred and a bit years ago.

    As a gross overstatement Africa hasn't become poor, it's become greedy.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  45. Rasterman Replies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    July 23, 2002

    I just love all the people of this world who have opinions on things but never actually are willing to stick anything behind them.

    Let me clarify some of the following: Interview and the wonders of Slashdot and the ability to look beyond the tips of their noses when reading anything on slashdot - most of the comments there are made before anyone has actually READ anything.

    Anyway - for the few level headed enough to 1. actually have contributed ever to linux or any part of it and not just spouted out words but not had the guts to back them with code and effort, or 2. actually see more than their little world and are willing to actually understand "the enemy" so to speak, they might actually see where I'm coming from.

    The desktop market share windows has isn't going away. It's entrenched. Everyone I speak to who devout isn't a linux head says "yeah - heard of linux - I know it's meant to be stable, but I can't use my apps on it". It's not a matter of if they will be happy with openoffice, or be happy with whatever equivalent there is - they want THAT PARTICULAR APP.

    Also not to mention the ease of use windows has. You plug in a new usb device, or a new card or anything. It detects it - find the driver or asks you for the disk you got in the box, and bingo. On linux? HA! Good luck. Half the time I need to do endless reserach first to see if its supported - and even if it is, half the time I have to do some obscure hunting for code I need to compile and specially configure that more often than not only paertially supports it - and even then with moe bugs than you can poke a stick at. The average person doesn't want to do this - and rightly, shouldn't. I won't stop using linux. I still use it as my desktop. I know many others do. But linux isn't goin to beat microsoft. It isnt' going to take the majority share of the desktop markent. I never said it was dead. I said Linux has lost. It's not going to win. Just because you lose does not mean you re dead, but don't expect the masses of cheering fans. It's going to remain the minority holder on the desktop. In that respect I see it as a loss.

    Also I haven't stopped working on stuff. I haven't stopped on E. I'm not bitter or have sour grapes. Just because someone asks me for facts and i give them without flowery words or soothing tones does not mean I'm bitter and am trying to extract my pound of flesh. I never really dodge the trusth or facts, and if people don't seem to be able to read something at face value - well that's their problem. Did I not say KDE and GNOME were doing a good job? Did I ever start Enlightenment with the aim to become an easy to use desktop for the masses? I never did. I never claimed such. Anyone who says so is putting words in my mouth. E was always a toy project. It is my toy. I get to push boundaires and explore ideas using it. It only ever made it open source for anyone elses desktop other than mine because people pestered me after seeing screenshots.

    Also people just didn't get my point. I'm saying the future Isn't a desktop at all - the encumbent (windows) on the desktop will stay, but the future isn't a desktop computer at all - it isn't a nasty mess of a desktop with taskbar and a screen and a mouse and keyboard. I'm not the first to say this by any means - and I won't be the last. Devices (such as pda's and the likes) now have the grunt that desktops had years ago. They are what I see as the future. Devices you use for a limited set of things that fit in your pocket, have no wires and always work. Have a look at the i-mode and ketai phenomenon in Japan. Most people just want to do things - they don't care how - be it via windows or linux. Whichever way works. The techies like us care how - but what I'm saying is we are the minority. The mass market where linux can be on everyone's desk is not via the PC desktop - you want linux everywhere? Put it on their phones, in their cars, on their trains, on their watches. That's how you will get that.

    I will continue to use Linux on my desktops because I like it. I will continue to develop for X because I like it. I will continue to use Linux on my laptop because I like it. I will do it because "I can" and because "I want to". But I will not go thinking that linux will take over the worlds desktop computers. There was a day years ago it might have had a fighting chance - if applications had started to be developed that people wanted, but that time has passed and all the apps are for the reigning OS and will stay that way mostly. The desktop isn't going to be a big thing for linux, but it has a fair go in other arenas.

    So those of you who thought I'd given up - no way. I've just switched game plan. I never was a Linux visionary - never wanted to be, never asked to be - people just seem to have said I am. I am going to leave being a visionary and political activist to others. I say things how I see them. Take everything I say with a grain of salt - invariably it's me trying to make a point. I'm a realist and I'm into the practical of things. If I'm going to fight I want to make sure I have a damn good chance at winning.

  46. Stupid Michael by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".

    Last time I checked the Amazon River Basin is largely UNEXPLORED. There are many many places left on earth out of America's Circle of Stupidity. That YOU don't know about them just makes it even sweeter for us. We DON'T want you Americans here, so you AREN'T.

  47. Uh, kid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red Dwarf

    Red Dwarf is a BBC series

  48. Television is like Alcohol by jafuser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lately, I like to consider watching television and/or movies, the same as most people think of the consumption of alcoholic beverages. It's fine to do it socially, while in the company of friends or family, but taking in too much (especially while you're only by yourself), is not good for you.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    1. Re:Television is like Alcohol by still_sick · · Score: 1

      Dude, if a person is already a closet alcoholic (drinks alone), don't you think he's got enough problems without you bringing him in out of left field to hold up as an example in a completely unrelated conversation? Besides, I don't drink alone. In the words of George, "Me and my good buddy Weiser, that's all I ever need.".

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    2. Re:Television is like Alcohol by WotanKhan · · Score: 1

      I've never understood this "conventional wisdom" regarding drinking. A vice is a vice. Whether you prefer to take a drink with others, or by yourself says more about your sociability than about the health consequences of your actions. Personally when with company I'd rather engage in activity that leaves room for active conversation and shared experiences.

    3. Re:Television is like Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh give me a break. alcohol does not hinder one's ability to have active conversations at all. you're still living in the '80s--nancy reagan certainly did a number on you.

  49. A sudden revelation by forkboy · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    As I was reading through these posts, wondering why American culture has spread so virally throughout the rest of the modern world, it struck me as to WHY foreign governments don't seem to be saying a while lot about it: Control.

    Think about it....has the American populace ever been so apathetic and easily manipulated as we have in the last 25 years? Our political and corporate leasership gets progressively worse and worse and yet the same people keep getting re-elected into office and appointed to positions of trust. This is a fucking wet dream not only for corrupt despots of all kinds in the rest of the world, but other so-called democracies and republics that don't want all the hassle that comes with actually appeasing people through honesty and care for citizens' well being.

    "Fuck it", they say, "let em watch TV so we can manipulate their views with mass media and satiate their desires by making them think they have to have all the useless crap that's advertised...they'll feel their needs are met when they make a few purchases."

    It's made most of us lazy, greedy, and apathetic...hardly anyone votes anymore and most of the ones that do cannot be bothered to think about who they're voting for, they just vote for whatever party they decided they liked in high school civics class. No one takes an interest in their community anymore. How many of you can say you know the names of all your neighbors? How many of you care? By this loss of sense of community and the artificial contentment that arises from being a "consumer", we don't take nearly as much of an active part in what's going on around us, community or government. Local or National.

    Don't let it fool you...American culture is about being controlled while at the same time feeling like you're the one in charge. You ARE in charge...of what channels you watch and what merchandise you buy. I have genuine respect for those who are willful enough to avoid watching television, or better yet, do not own one. When the revolution comes, you'll be the ones who aren't watching it on CNN.

    Happiness can't be found in catch phrases, soft drinks, feel-good tv shows, or pop music. I feel sorry for the people of Bhutan. It sounds like it used to be a nice place.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    1. Re:A sudden revelation by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you only knew how right you are... Everybody, think about this question for a while:

      In which society is propaganda most important, in a dictatorship or a democracy?

      For more on this subject, read Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent, which explains how the seven media filters make sure nothing nasty (like, for instance, the truth) reaches the public. It's a quite heavy book to read, but very interesting.

      Also, for brilliant US political satire comics, something I discovered yesterday: This Modern World, by Tom Tomorrow. (I don't think the penguin is related to Linux though.)

    2. Re:A sudden revelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough, but people like Ray Bradbuy said the same thing in _Fahrenheit_451_ and George Orwell said so in _1984_. There is even an Arthur C. Clarke short story about people who coccoon themselves in TV/car pods and totally separate themselves from the world. Of course, this leads to their destruction.

      Why is it hard to recognize this directly relates to contemporary life? It's part of the system. My father works 45 hours a week and spends the vast majority of his spare time watching TV, which continually reinforces the idea that he is good, American, sufficient, and A-ok. He would never think that his physical or mental health are deteriorating due to the TV addiction, nor would he suggest that it IS an addiction.

      I even mentioned once that he should buy a DVD player, a device I thought he would truly enjoy since he does watch so much TV. He said, "No, if I had a DVD player, I would feel obligated to stay home and watch it all the time." He's even subconciously loyal to the television.

    3. Re:A sudden revelation by osolemirnix · · Score: 2

      Yeah dude, old Julius Caesar figured this one out too, he called it "bread and games". So in other words, give your people jobs/consumer goods and entertainment and you can pretty much rule as you like.

      Interesting to note though, that it was the King of Bhutan who resisted this for so long. Sounds like a good leader to me (tries to do what's in the best interest of his people). So maybe all is not lost for Bhutan.

      --

      Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
    4. Re:A sudden revelation by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Damn! I agree with you post 100%. I have a TV, a really nice widescreen HDTV but I don't subscribe to cable or satelite. I get channels over the air and use it to watch DVDs.

      I also agree with the level of apathy in this country and that it directly relates to the increasing power of our government.

      --

      mbbac

    5. Re:A sudden revelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't forget Richard Bachman's The Running Man, which was later turned into a movie by the same name. The book (surprise, surprise) is much better than the movie, and it deals with similar issues (the Free-Vee, which is the gov't-mandated television in every home).

      BTW, Richard Bachman is/was a pen name for Stephen King. I haven't read any of King's books recently, but the stuff he wrote under the Bachman pseudonym is fantastic, if a bit dark.

    6. Re:A sudden revelation by PMadavi · · Score: 1
      I think most of your post is quite true. The majority of American watch TV, eat McDonalds, wear Nike, and sit on their asses on election day. However, I don't really think that this is necessarily a product of television. I certainly think that TV has augmented the effect of "control" over the masses that has been the calling card of most any form of government ever implemented.

      Take the Roman Empire for example. Control came in the form of "bread and circus," as it was put. Entertainment and food (i.e. TV and McDonalds). Other less "democratic" societies simply excercised control via physical force and strong social norms, the City-State of Sparta, for example. I don't necessarily think we or more or less sheeplike than any other society before us.

      Of course, we could get into numerous discussions about the role of government, and the greater purpose of human existence(if one exists).

      Perhaps, the illusion of happiness is just as good as the real thing?

      --

      --What, you ain't know about them country fried sessions?

    7. Re:A sudden revelation by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      It's not entertainment opiates that make for an 'apathetic' populace, it's FOOD.

      We're not hungry, we're not angry, at least not for any appreciable amount of time. That why Saddam Hussein and African Dictators starve their own people, to encourage misery and dissent which can be used to blame and destroy the cultural 'enemy' of their choosing.

      If and when the Revolution comes, the New Boss will be much worse than the Old Boss, believe you me. Ideology thrives on mountainous piles of human meat and oceans of blood, because the End is always deemed as more important than the means.

      Kicking the TV habit and getting to know your neighbors are things we each do ourselves by choice. The minute you try to mandate such things you have created a State. Feed people, educate them in the basics and then let them live. If their idea of living is endless rounds of WWF, then so be it. You and I have come to find greater value in other things, but that does not mean that we are superior.

      --
      **>>BELCH
    8. Re:A sudden revelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the Communist Manifesto -- still just as important today as it was back then.

    9. Re:A sudden revelation by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      How can a single persons decision ever be in the best interest of the people? That's an amazingly elitest and aristocratic view of things. That one man can know what's best for all? Well maybe those TVs will inform the people that they should have more self governance and not continually rely on the whims of one man.

      A lot of the posts here talk about TV as being a tool of the govenment controlling the masses. But in this case (as in many other cases) it may be the opposite.

      Course this gang of idiots (slashdot) here discussing what may or may not be good for Bhutan without knowing a single thing about it, is the very pinnacle of elitism. It's sickening!

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  50. Your post mate? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    A few starters.
    3rd world countries:
    there's the 1st world (the allies!)
    the 2nd worlds (the commies/fascists or whatever)
    and the 3rd world, everyone else.

    So the 3rd world are just unclassified countries, not poor or rich or anything else for that matter.

    Freedom? freedom compared to what? being a native American a few hundreds years ago? freedom compared to the 10hour weeks enjoyed by our hunter gather ancestors?

    America isn't free, they've just painted the walls that keep you in with pretty flowers and butterfly's to make it look like freedom.

    money, well I think you meant greed, hopefully the people of Bhutan will stay as Buddhist as possible and rebut the influx of greed, but then again greed is more addictive than crack.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Your post mate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      freedom compared to the 10hour weeks enjoyed by our hunter gather ancestors?

      You can't possibly believe that. Ever done any hunting? Even with the fancy modern tools like a rifle with a telescopic sight? Ever tried to live off food you could "just find" for more than a week? In winter? Heck, have you even ever gone backpacking for longer than 2 weeks?

      It's nice to imagine the ancient world as a beautiful, harmonious place where everyone was at peace with Nature, but it just ain't so.

    2. Re:Your post mate? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Well i've done fishing, snareing and dogs are quite good for catching most things.
      Birds are easy to catch.

      gethering is easy too.

      I'm sure it's not to hard to find litriture about native americans or people that lived in the jungle this way.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:Your post mate? by Overd0g · · Score: 1

      America is free, as is a great deal of the world. I think a lot of people simply don't like what people choose when they are free: American culture.

  51. Will Thee Move Thy Horseless Carriage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know, the Amish have been doing a pretty good job of preventing their culture from becoming "Americanized" as far as I can tell, and they live in America.

    1. Re:Will Thee Move Thy Horseless Carriage? by Knightfall · · Score: 1

      I live in an area that has the 2nd largest Amish population in the country. ALL of my neighbors while growing up were Amish and I am very sad to say that this is not the case. Their basic religious fundamentals are still in tact but you now see them buying only the name brand products (Coca-Cola and Busweiser anyone ... very much a NO NO supposedly). Many of them, despite not having electricty can still tell you what is happening on popular TV shows. The elders are holding on as best they can but the up and comming generation are finding it very difficult to remain steadfast to the old ways when there is so much advertisement on what you should have and so much sensationalism of what you "should" be. They are wonderful people and I do hope they are able to keep their culture strong.

      --


      Knightfall
    2. Re:Will Thee Move Thy Horseless Carriage? by badvictor · · Score: 1
      However, the resistance of American culture, or western culture or modern culture, is the defining characteristic of the Amish. Not so for Bhutan. From the article it sounds like they want to jump on the "progress" bandwagon and move "forward." If that's their mindset they'll get "Americanized" in no time at all.

      What they should've done is legalized TV, but not advertising. That's where the real evil is.

    3. Re:Will Thee Move Thy Horseless Carriage? by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      the scary thing is that it's probably easier to stay under radar in this country than outside of it. it also helps that they don't have quite enough money to make them a viable market.

  52. Homogonized Culture by Ezubaric · · Score: 3, Insightful


    These fears aren't just about Bhutan. If anything, America faces as great a threat from the death of local culture as anywhere else. The only difference is that we delude ourselves into thinking that raking in money makes it all "okay."

    Sure, we feel more comfortable when we travel when we can order the same extra value meal in in every time zone, but I can only echo the sentiments of Lisa on the variety of Americana:

    Lisa: Wow, Dad and Bart have been everywhere! They've eaten submarine sandwiches, grinders, *and* hoagies.

    Damn. I guess I've been taken in by the tentacles too. I guess it's okay as long as I can super-size.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
  53. What the TV Execs are saying by cranos · · Score: 1

    All your base are belong to us!!!!!

  54. ...and give these to the world. by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Your whole post is great, but these last few words really nail it. The fact is, common Americans have squat to do with "giving our culture to the world." First off, we don't export, big Katzian corporations do. Second off, we don't travel abroad, at least we can't afford to very often, and can't do much personal export.

    So maybe I'd be willing to give some of my culture to the world, but there's not much way or opportunity. Instead we have Disney and AOL/Time Warner selling American "culture", as you say. The key distinction is between "give" and "sell".

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:...and give these to the world. by sebi · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like you are doing a lot of the travelling abroad. Young Americans seem to really enjoy partying hard when they can legally drink under the age of 21. But they are not as bad as people from Nordic countries that are happy to be able to buy drinks that cost less than their average monthly wages. And there allways seem to be a lot of energetic old people with stared and striped T-Shirts. At the end of the day US tourists arent that bad though. Zee Germans can really get to you.

  55. not WWF by nonane · · Score: 1

    Get the F out. Its WWE you nerds!

    1. Re:not WWF by awrc · · Score: 1, Troll

      Get the F out. Its WWE you nerds!

      Tough words for someone whose heroes got taken out by a panda.

    2. Re:not WWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahah... nice.

  56. Culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling TV "culture" is an affront to petri dishes around the world.

  57. Linux is american!?!?! by jonr · · Score: 2

    WOW, I didnt know that!!!
    Who is this Linus Torvalds then?

    1. Re:Linux is american!?!?! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Without the AMERICAN Richard Stallman, there would be no Linux.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  58. Tristan de Cunha is the most remote place on earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Robert Heinlein, Tristan de Cunha is the most remote place on earth, not Bhutan.

  59. Less tolerant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't like Sadam. No, not for the human rights violations. For the profit, their oil. Same with Afghanistan. Oil in the backlands of Afghanistan.
    There is no oil in Palestina or Israel. No wonder nothing gets done about that.

    CIA actions in different countries.
    Forcing other countries to open their markets while keeping theirs protected.
    Kyoto and CO2. Deathpenalty (for retarted youngsters), gunlaws, Economical imperialism.

    Need more examples? Now WHO is intolerant?

  60. Excuse the Fuck out of me but by gelfling · · Score: 1, Troll

    I noticed the BBC is on that list.

    1. Re:Excuse the Fuck out of me but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find that the BBC creates locally produced programes, for the local audience. The World Service simply provides the facilities and the know how. They certainly don't push Men Behaving Badly in a dubbed Hindi version, if thats what you think.

    2. Re:Excuse the Fuck out of me but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand the US tried re-making Red Dwarf and Men Behaving Badly for themselves. What a pile of shit they turned out to be......

      Ah Good Old BBC.

  61. Mod me "Off Topic" if you will, but... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had it up to here (hand waving just over top of head) with people dissing American "culture", as it's always put.

    Let's face it, what passes for culture in, say, Northern Europe is the art produced to the taste of a small elite that maintained its position through violence and threats of violence.

    In much of the rest of the world, what passes for culture involves things like clitorectomy, honor killing of women, huge rates of infant mortality, etc.

    What's America got by comparison? Well, an empowered middle class that gets to do pretty much what it wants. Hence we have backyard barbeques, tailgate parties, Budweiser, The Simpsons, large bellies, and early cholesterol death.

    And guess what? We like it like that!

    Now, don't get me wrong, there is room in the fringes for the next Mozart. In fact, bring it on! If we like it, we'll make you a multi-millionaire.

    You see, that's the beauty of American culture: it's a total democracy of taste, and the mob gets to vote with its pocket book.

    Now, I know that the elites in other parts of the world just totally gnash their teeth at this. That's what elites do when confronted with deomcracy.

    Well, get used to it.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Mod me "Off Topic" if you will, but... by cranos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hmm lets just see what the mob has brought us shall we?

      - Cops
      - Jerry Springer
      - George W Bush
      - Execution of Mentally Handicapped Prisoners
      - George W Bush

      And many others.

  62. Don't unplug your TV, don't unplug your mind eithr by FatSean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You claim that the manipulation of the population of the US has become much more profound in the last 25 years. I think you are being a bit short sighted. You speak of Mass Media manipulating people...but people have been manipulated for eternity. Does being told what to buy and believe become more acceptable when it's the rest of your town/neighborhood doing the telling, rather than a corporation? Your complaints about corrupt polititions being re-elected is also an on-going theme in human government.

    In short, nothing has changed except your perception. Do you truely think that Maw and Paw Kettle out in Bumfuck, ID knew about political scandles back in the 1800's? Of course not, all they knew about washington was reported in a newspaper. A newspaper that 'played nice' with the politicos. Things seem worse because you can see all the bad events, but trust me, this stuff has been going on forever. Do you really think the industrial magnates of the first half of the 20th century were 100% pure? Yeah right! When you own all the steel in the country, you do what you want.

    Don't throw out the TV...maybe turn off the cable. Just remember that it's all entertainment. Even the 'news', and especially CSPAN!

    --
    Blar.
  63. Oh, dear! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    Next thing you know they'll get the internet and we'll have another September that never ended, as all the monks "log in the internet" and fill defile it with their spam and meetoo posts.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  64. Guess What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They WANT it, otherwise, they wouldn't be getting it. TV doesn't come where there isn't money to be made.

  65. A good movie about this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Called "The Cup". About foreign 'culture' influencing ancient Buddhist traditions.
    Read about it here, here and here.

    Although I don't come from a Buddhist land, I know first hand what it is like to have your country destroyed by Americanism.

  66. How DARE you speak the truth! by marlowe · · Score: 1

    This comment area is for America bashing only!!!

    --
    http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe Better a smartass than a dumbass.
  67. Information Pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TeeVee isn't the problem, its information pollution that is the problem. We all have seen what can happen when the information pollution gets on the internet. It make finding quality information harder. The signal to noise ratio goes down, and being an idiot becomes a social norm.

  68. Europe got culture? by marlowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, boy. I am such a redneck. I need to put on a Kraftwerk CD and read some gibberish by Derrida. And then maybe go out and pogrom a few Jews. Then I'll be suave and sophisticated.

    And now is the time on Sprockets where we go on about how much more culture we have than the Americans.

    Okay, I'll grant Europe had a fine culture, once. Operas and architecture and symphonies and everything. But that was a gosh-darn long time ago. Let's just face it. Europe has been in decline, culturally and politically, for about a century now.

    I can get Beethoven, Mozart and Sibelius on CD. I can get the Dutch masters in high quality reproduction. I can even get the worthless crap the French are passing off as philosophy these days, though there's not much point. Who needs Europe anymore? It's all used up.

    Nowadays, someone mentions European culture, and what comes to mind is the topless aerobics in that Chevy Chase movie. Just think, honey. They've been doing this for eons!

    --
    http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe Better a smartass than a dumbass.
    1. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you lot still listen to ALOT of UK music.
      Persoanlly I listen to alot of Ukranian Trance music and german industrial techno. But you wouldn't get to hear that though would you?

      Kraftwerk? Now your are just scraping the barrel.

      I've lived and worked in the USA. I found it plastic, superficial and souless.

    2. Re:Europe got culture? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

      In my opinion we more or less agree. The whole point of culture is that you have a history in which people, nations or whatever achieved a certain thing. Europe and Asia are much longer around to produce things that can be called culture.
      But i agree with you when you say that was all a long time ago, as in almost acient history. There are only a few cultural achievements this century, but this is a problem concerning the whole world, and not just europe.

    3. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe I'll put on Britney Spears CD, watch some Oprah, kill some more people on ski holidays with my reckless flying, rape some japanese schoolgirls and make what's left of the Indians live in some desert. But, ooh, wait, I have to call them "Native Americans" while opress them, because I'm so politically correct.
      And I've got bigger guns than anybody, to make people agreee with me.

    4. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the parent poster struck a nerve. For all your culture, Europeans have been the greatest inflictors of pain, death, misery and destruction for the last half millenia.

    5. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh huh unlike america, go look up how many civilian were killed during americas bombing raids (not even wars) in yugoslavia, iraq, afghanistan

    6. Re:Europe got culture? by nanoakron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Troll, anyone?

      "Nowadays, someone mentions European culture, and what comes to mind is the topless aerobics in that Chevy Chase movie. "

      Well, we'll just ignore the connections we make in our minds:

      USA - loudmouthed, ignorant, racist, nationalistic fat rednecks eating McDonald's.

    7. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indians I'll agree with you on, that they shouldn't have been killed off and secluded.

      But please don't blame me for that. My ancestors were in various parts of Europe at the time. :)

      I don't see the America of old as the America of today. The America of old was basically just a bunch of isolationist Brits who refused to pay their taxes.

      Since then, we've had a lot of immigration. And I do mean a lot. Indeed, the decendants of poeple who did things like kill Indians and keep slaves are now a minority of the population in America. In a few generations, the majority won't even be white. Who'da thunk it?

      I think the only thing that defines America is that nothing defines it. So when people make generalizations about America and Americans, I can't help but find them silly. (Even when these generalizations happen to be favorable and patriotic.)

      Think of America as like a fluid mob of people, each doing their own thing.

    8. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, Europe - Snide, racist, nationalistic, anti-semtic, conformist, snobs who won't lift a finger to help millions being slaughtered in their own back yard.

    9. Re:Europe got culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to all the civilians that were killed because Europe lacked the backbone to act? The same Europe that said, "Never again!" after the WWII Holocaust, but did nothing when Milosovich started doing the same thing? That Europe?

      As long as we're clear on that.

    10. Re:Europe got culture? by fatboy · · Score: 1

      USA - loudmouthed, ignorant, racist, nationalistic fat rednecks eating McDonald's.

      Europe - Home of Hitler,Stalin,Mussolini,and Milosevic.
      And you call us racist and nationalistic?

      --
      --fatboy
    11. Re:Europe got culture? by limbostar · · Score: 1

      Anything you don't believe in looks plastic, superficial, and soulless.

      That's the Way It Is.

      --
      this is a sig.
    12. Re:Europe got culture? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

      about causing missery, the americans are lately doing there best to catch up with the europeans. But besides that, america has its good things, just as europe, i have to agree with that.

    13. Re:Europe got culture? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

      As it easy for the americans to speak, as they do not recognize the international court of justice. As if americans do not commit war crimes.

    14. Re:Europe got culture? by kraven_73 · · Score: 1

      ahhh, america - Only coming to aid if it hurts there wallet or when it doesn't fit their political view of the world.

  69. McDonalds... by jonr · · Score: 2

    Whats wrong with McDonalds? Tasteless, bland, small, factory-style food. Here we have local hamburger joint, ironically named "American Style" where you can get hamburgers like god intended them to be. Big, juicy and with TASTE! Something that McDonalds totally forgot.
    But of course the sheeps go to McDonalds with their screaming kids. I have taken a vow to never set a foot inside McDonalds again!

    1. Re:McDonalds... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Whats wrong with McDonalds? Tasteless, bland, small, factory-style food. Here we have local hamburger joint, ironically named "American Style" where you can get hamburgers like god intended them to be. Big, juicy and with TASTE! Something that McDonalds totally forgot.
      You have to understand that if Wac Donald's (or Burper King for that matter) would make hamburgers that did taste something, the taste would be bound to displease some people. So, in order to keep market share, hamburgers are totally tasteless in order to offend no one.
  70. Watch what happens... by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see what happens as as sociologists inevitably track this. Not that I am one, but I predict that Bhutan will move from a country that measures Gross National Happiness to one with increases in crime, violence, obesity, selfishness and stupidity, as does everything else Amerikan "culture" infects.

  71. re: The Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you haven't noticed: the Simpsons are a satire of the society you're describing. Some of us (i.e. not the mob) get the second degree in the show. Yes, there is one! And it's making fun of assholes like you.
    Your post show be moderated as Troll. Good day!

  72. Never mind *there* what about *here*? by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1
    Look at what it's done to our generation! We're thoughtless and unoriginal, we turn to movie versions of TV shows and call it entertainment (Spiderman, Charlies Angels, The Brady Bunch Movie, The Flintstones, ad nauseum).

    And has there ever been a time in the recording industry with as many cookie-cutter fabrications of music like 'NSync, Britney Spears and Limp Bizkit?

    If we ever want to do right by other cultures, we should sort our own out first otherwise we'll just keep re-polluting them over and over again!

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  73. The Evil TV plot... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    it's official, there is no escape from American "culture".

    Or Great Britian "culture" or Austrailian "culture" or whatever "culture"

    television is an entertainment device and if people are entertained by "culture" then let them.

    God forbid they discover that the world isnt flat and there are other people in it.. let alone the fact that the people you were bred to hate all your life are not really as bad as your government told you they were... (Go watch some Chinese or Russian Television programmes or movies.)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:The Evil TV plot... by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      television is an entertainment device and if people are entertained by "culture" then let them.

      I suppose there's some validity to this statement, but I think the probblem is the presentation of our culture, not so much its entertainment value. We package things in such a way as to make people think they can't live without all the crap they see on TV, or that there's something wrong with a person if they're not like the guy or girl on show X.

  74. Rumschpringen by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

    You do have a cute ignorance about the Amish, doncha?

    Just 'cause you're Amish doesn't mean you don't go through a period of druggin' drinkin' drivin' and enjoying the sins of the flesh

    I have it on pretty reliable authority, second-hand from several Mennonites I know, that your average 30-something Amish man or woman has been pretty exposed to "Americanization" at one point or another, and this exposure is an essential part to their culture.

    1. Re:Rumschpringen by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They really played up that 'defame the Amish' show on NPR that you link to. It seemed like the liberals at NPR were actually gleeful in the endless promotional material they played in the weeks before the program. They also allowed the promotional spots to 'lead' the listener to believe the young Amish were engaging in orgies, rather than a little youthful drinking.

      One can reject something one has been exposed to.

    2. Re:Rumschpringen by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

      Its certainly not all the Amish kids, by any stretch, and its absolutely not something that the seems widespread amongst the adults, but (and I am getting this all second hand, mind you)...

      it is more than "youthful drinking". It includes some promiscuous, unmarried sex. It includes gang-fights. It includes driving drunk. Television, music, electronic devices, automobile driving, use of illicit substances and sex all seem par for the course, and commonplace.

      You can absolutely reject something you've been exposed to -- that's not the point. The point was that they're exposed to it in the first place, and the act of rejection has become important in their culture...They're hardly untainted by modern US culture, they just respond to it differently.

  75. negative connotation to consolidation by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    Why is it that we frown on cultural extinction? Sure anthropologists would like to study the vast array of cultures and traditions, but what practical purpose does it serve but to keep us apart? Social Scientists know, but dont ever say that the socioeconomic benefits of adopting universalizing culture and language (western) are significant. People suggest that "American Imperialism" tramples the traditions of the oppressed. Well guess what, if their traditions were better, we'd be accepting them. As it is, our culture is one of communication, freedom, and understanding. You say cultural oppression, I say liberation from outdated, unpractical, inhumane, and discriminatory practices. Teenagers in bhutan today have a LOT more in common with teenagers in the USA. Hopefully these commonalities will prove useful at the peace negotiations of the future. We can get rid of the stagnant warmongering old guard and move to a peaceful world. All thanks to TV.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:negative connotation to consolidation by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Whoa. On what planet are Buddhist monks the stagnant warmongering old guard, and "Terminator" and the world wrestling federation a 'peaceful world'?

      We in America are a cancerous growth- sort of. We're a hell of a lot like, say, Microsoft- everything will be great if we don't ask any questions, don't stop to think, don't slow down! This masks some fundamental problems with our values.

      There are a lot of places in the world where trying to imitate us in the USA has led to a world of hurt. Attempts to do high-yield agriculture, attempts to use 'free trade' by setting up sweatshops and such things- if our value is just 'MORE' well, that's a problem.

      There was a time when we had much more specific values- 1776. If you read things like the Federalist Papers you'll see the words of people with far more depth to them than you commonly see these days. I have! Everybody here is fond of Jefferson for his thoughts on IP being like a flame that is spread, not diminished, but I'm also a fan of Madison and Federalist #10, and that guy would have understood this situation perfectly. He was the one loudly demanding that the majority be prevented from automatically trampling smaller factions (cultures) just by its own weight. Instead of proposing that Shangri-La be trampled by the weight of Western 'culture' (exactly how do you consider 'Seinfeld' culture? Answer carefully- it's a trick question, and a deeper question than you think), how about devoting some thought to how this 'living meme', Shangri-La, which has echoed throughout culture and literature like some earthly Heaven, can be allowed to retain its own identity? Because IT WANTS TO. It's just that you don't saddle a damned butterfly and expect it to be the same.

      Can't help but be reminded of Douglas Adams' little parable about Fuolornis Fire Dragons...

    2. Re:negative connotation to consolidation by duck_prime · · Score: 1
      [...]how about devoting some thought to how this 'living meme', Shangri-La, which has echoed throughout culture and literature like some earthly Heaven, can be allowed to retain its own identity? Because IT WANTS TO.
      But ... obviously, they don't. That's why they are turning on Skynet-- er, American television. Now it's going to be the individual choice of every Bhutanese family; instead of one cultural template to pick from, now they'll have several. Isn't that ... diversity? Isn't that good?
  76. WWF by mbbac · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with Bhuddists watching the World Wildlife Foundation? Oh, you must have meant WWE.

    --

    mbbac

  77. Americans who travel abroad by dpilot · · Score: 2

    I'd assert that by the time an American goes abroad, there's already likely been quite a bit of "sorting" done. Those party-hearty young Americans are most likely out of the very wealthy, as are the old energetic. They're not average.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Americans who travel abroad by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had to explain this to my wife one time.

      She's from Thailand (Bangkok), and they get their share of American tourists. Her stereotypical idea of an American, based on her experiences, is that of a loud-mouthed, demanding person that's always smacking gum and throwing money around. Once she moved here to the US she saw things alot differently.

      The problem with foreign perception of Americans is that about the only Americans that travel and make it overseas are rich jackasses. They treat people like shit here and going overseas doesn't magically change that. So other countries get the worst upper-crust nimrods and the rest of us nice folks take the rap for them. I think if most foreigners that hate Americans actually come visit Texas or some other state for a year, they'll learn what Americans are really like.

    2. Re:Americans who travel abroad by dpilot · · Score: 1

      You made the point more eloquently than I did. Thanks.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:Americans who travel abroad by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      I thought Texas was your holding pen for crazy conservative types (and California for the liberals, respectively) - shouldn't we foreigners visit upper new york state or something? :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  78. Intellectual snobbery. by Dusabre · · Score: 1

    If the people of Bhutan want to watch tv, then it's their choice. If they want to pray instead, then it's also their choice. If Hulk Hogan is a threat to Buddhist culture then that says something about Buddhism. I don't like the tone of editorial comment, is Slashdot, another example of global, if not blatantly US, culture that also should be 'escaped' from by government restriction?

  79. Nah, its alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bhutan ISP & NIC runs Linux, Apache & mysql!

    Kuensal Online is generated with PHP Nuke. Free software wins! Maybe a small case study is in order? Anyone from Bhutan reading Slashdot? :)

  80. Bhutanese football by The+Pim · · Score: 2

    Another curious story about Bhutan.

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  81. Those mocking quotes by hinty · · Score: 1

    It's just not cool to make fun of anyone's culture with the mocking quotes. By spending ten or so seconds looking at the article about Bhutan it says that they are getting an Indian cable feed. So should we also mock Indian "culture" as well?

    As far as what American culture gets exported - hey - it's not like certain music, films, or television shows are purposely kept for the sole use of Americans on American soil. Demand is the decision maker. There is plenty of crap out there, and there is plenty of good stuff as well.

    And one final point. Is the author suggesting that Bhutan is better off having no tv legally? Should they be kept from watching the news on the BBC or CNN? Should they not be allowed to watch a cricket match or soccer/football on Star Sports or ESPN? Should they be spared from the National Geographic Channel and the Discovery Channel as well? Are those things for non-Bhutan residents of the world only?

  82. Didn't we undergo this before?? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    Folks,

    I think the fall of cultural provincialism via the spread of television is not exactly a new phenomenon.

    Think about it: when the Roman Empire spread throughout the Mediterrean, the culture of that empire heavily stomped out most local cultures and/or adapted local cultures to Roman needs. It was this singular culture that allowed Christianity to spread throughout the Empire by the 3rd Century AD.

    When Johann Gutenberg invented the moveable type printing press around 1453, it made it much easier to spread learning around Europe. The ability to print thousands of identical copies of books formed the basis of national culture throughout Europe.

    And from the 1920's on, the rapid deployment of radio did a lot to reduce provincial spoken dialects, especially with national radio networks pretty much forcing people to speak in very few or only one standard dialect(s).

    Television is just only a recent medium that is stomping out cultural provincialism through the world; the Internet is doing the same right now.

    1. Re:Didn't we undergo this before?? by cthulhu_will_rise · · Score: 1

      And truthfully, Bhutan has also undergone such changes before in their past. Hundreds of years ago "Bhutan" was a collection of valley tribes who shared no common language. This was largely a matter of geography as the mountains that seperate these valleys are rather substantial. Due to some odd circumstances, the Tibetans took issue with their neighboors in Bhutan and would invade down these valleys. In response to this, there was a cohesive effort at defense which resulted in defensive towers (Dzongs) being built along these invasion paths. A side effect of the cooperation needed to accomplish this public works effort was the development of a national language, Dzongkha (note the similarity between the two words.) So, external influence causing internal change. Nothing revolutionary, just an example of how the world has affected them in the past. For a quick overview of things Bhutan, check out: http://www.kingdomofbhutan.com/kingdom.html

  83. Surfing the wave. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    This so-called "western culture" that all the backward nations are belly-aching about as "destroying their culture" is a bit of a misnomer. Sure it's predominantly identified with us, but you've got to realize that this wave of progress... this wave of technology and science, this wave of freedom and consumerism and all the good and bad things that go along with it... has been sweeping across all of humanity on this planet since the caveman days and has gained momentum exponentially, especially in about the past 300 years or so. Americans (and the rest of the "western society") have simply just learned how to surf this wave better than anyone else. There are those who, when upon seeing big waves pounding against the beach, proclaim, "Oh no!, There must be a storm coming" and then run and hide and bury their heads in the sand. Then there are those who proclaim, "Surf's Up Dude!" and charge headlong into it to catch a ride. If you do not progress forward, you die out. That's simply the way the universe is. Denying progress and intentionally stagnating your society is stupid as hell.

  84. Well! by *Serinitywhisper* · · Score: 1

    Well, I think the best thing you can do is to simply not watch tv. As an American, I can honestly say that yes we do have a lot of trash tv. We are in the years of the ever growing talk shows and of course we have the king of trash Jerry Springer. If you're looking for something worthwhile to watch on Tv I think you'll be looking for a long time to come. Thats my opinion. Just turn it off.

  85. Freedom is a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about advertising. People who haven't been exposed to mind-numbing advertisements all their life cannot escape mentally from them. So they'll buy anything you tell is good for them, if they can afford it.

    It's not about freedom or being free like the US people or anything like that. Maybe some people would like to believe it is so, but it isn't. The reason is saturation to advertising.

    When a Frenchman buys a Coca Cola, does he subconsciously want to be free like the americans? I doubt it. He just wants to cold drink. If it has somekind of taste which tells his body it is very good, i.e. sugar, then he might go for it.

  86. Some people are crazy by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who has actually left the country(USA) and travaled to diffrent parts of the world (mainly asia and the middle east)let me tell you something; US, Canada, England, Australia, and many of the european countries have a good deal of freedoms pretty much in line with the bill of rights none of these countries way out thier in there laws(minus few tech laws but these will get ironed out in time and reps get more tech savvy). When I was in thailand I found it is legal to have sex with very young girls and prostitution is a mojor industry there. Some may say they have the freedom to prostitute themselves others would say its morally objectionable. these are the things that go on in other countries generally I like thai peopel they are friendly and don't look down on you because your american. when I was in japan and hong kong they would not let americans in to certain bars and nightclubs this obviously racism but no one cares. when in the middle east our female marines and sailors could not go out at night becuase they are females. If i was to rank America on personal freedoms she would easily be in the top ten. The U.S. set the standard for personal freedoms for citizens but now I think the Us has been lagging a little bit putting corporate interests ahead of the peoples. Currently this is just a minor nuisance but could get bad if left unchecked. Eventually the world be completely connected ( all hail the internet) . And the best ideas will surface and eventually be accepted. Right now Everything has an American slant to it because Americans and American Corporations get these products and ideas to market to the widest spectrum of people eventually this will change. and we will all be better for it. but whatever ihave to get back to work.

  87. Nice, real nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    g-damn hippies. No one goes around forcing people to watch American television, movies or listen to our music or read our books. Is it America's fault that our culture and style is popular? Except amongsy pointy headed 'intellectuals' and leftist-hippies.

  88. Less lies, more truth! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Ugh. We are free you moron. Just because you aren't legally allowed to pirate all the intellectual property under the sun does not mean aren't free. Just what exactly would you like to do that you think an American isn't allowed to do, other than what I've already stated?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  89. Export it all by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

    I'm sure that following shortly on the heels of WWE and Coca-cola will be the highly judgemental and anti-populist attitudes about such things. Your reaction to these things is also a part of the culture. Meanwhile, we should be kinda happy about the export of these other cultural notes:

    - trial by jury
    - women's rights
    - end of torture
    - highly productive economy
    - separation of church and state
    - education of the masses
    - modern medicine
    - multicultural tolerance ...and much, much more.

  90. More Chinese Restaurants Please by Shihar · · Score: 1

    American culture is truly fascinating. It is a very infectious culture that most nations are finding very hard to keep out. The reason why it is so damned hard to keep out is that despite governments best efforts to slow it down or stop it, the people just flat out like American culture. France is a prime example. Here you have a nation whose government is actively fighting tooth and nail against American culture, and despite this, they are loosing. While some French might hate it, it is hard to convince someone that McDonalds, MTV, and Coke are bad things. If the people really wanted McDonalds to go away, they would just have to stop giving them money.

    Personally, I think the spread of American culture is a good thing. American culture is the stuff that topples dictators and destroys ultra orthodox laws. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying that American is perfect, far from it in fact, but it is better then many places on this planet. I would personally like to see as much American culture boxed up and sent to places like China and the Middle East as possible. These are places that suffer from oppressive regimes. If Coke, McDonalds, and MTV can dent these regimes, then we should be mass producing this stuff.

    I think that the entire 'war on terror' is a waste. Go ahead and do what you have to do, but your main weapon should not be stealth bombers. The main weapon should be picking out nations we don't like and dumping our culture on their soil. Dropping TVs and happy meals out of a C-130 would do far more create peaceful democrat nations then dropping bombs. As much as I dislike her music, watching Britney Spears dance around half naked on Islamic television would do far more to convince Islamic woman that they should not be forced by law to be treated so poorly, then dropping bombs on their heads would.

    Using culture as an excuse for oppression is never a valid argument. In America an Islamic woman is free to wear full body covering if she pleases. Just the other day I saw a group of woman dressed all in black, covered head to toe so that they could only see through an eye veil. No one gave them anything more then a passing glance, and the police officer they walked by didn't even blink. Now, personally I would never choose to wear that, but I have the option too. A woman in American dress in some Islamic states would have been beaten to death if the police officer and not punished them first.

    We are not perfect. We still have a few dumb laws, and we still have dumb people. We have the KKK and other hate organizations. These things can not be helped. Because our culture is open and free means that you have to take the good with the bad. The occasional nut that uses the openness of our culture to inflict hate crimes upon others are a very small minority.

    Finally, as to the argument that American culture is intolerant, this foolishness is easily debunked by anyone who has never spent five minutes in an American city. Pick a culture and you fill find it happily accepted in any American city. We like other cultures. We love to scoot over and make room for other cultures to add their two cents. Have you ever heard Americans complain that there is too many Chinese food or Indian restaurants? Hell no! While the French are crying over McDonalds offering good cheap fast food that somehow threatens their culture, we are happily blowing over buildings to let the culture of the month build a restaurant. You have good cheap food in your country too? Great! Send us some.

    So sure, go ahead and send us your poor and wretched and all that jazz. However, while you are at it, be sure to bring your restaurants, Nintendos, Mercedes, anime, games, music, movies, technology, and anything else you might have of interest. We won't turn up our noses and bitch about our culture being ruined when another fast food Chinese restaurant opens up, they start playing anime in the theater, they ship us some more Mercedes, and for the love of all that is good, send more Game Cubes and Japanese games.

  91. Tell me something...... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    As an American I am curious. How could the Germans possibly be worst tourists than we? The American Minister of International Annoyance is expecting a report from me on how we can improve our own curriculum on pissing off the world so I would appreciate your help, thanks.

    NDPTAL85
    Sub-Vice Counsel, Office of International Annoyance.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  92. free by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Well just because,
    How do you teach a moron?
    with a lesson.
    here goes

    Well
    your not free as in beer (IP)
    your not free as in liberty (e.g. is suicide still illeagle in some of the states? can I get arrested for indicent exposure?)
    your not free as in freedome of movement
    you not free as in choice
    you not free as in speach (DMCA and all that).
    you not free as in privacy
    It wouldn't supprise me if there are laws aginst thinking some things!

    you'r not really that free, it's just the pretty pitures on the walls that make you think you are, like crack addicts.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laws against thinking... even then, you'd never get caught. Why bother with laws for that anwyay?

    2. Re:free by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Those are strawmen. No one (or people who matter that is) really give a crap about any of that stuff.

      Suicide? Are you that stupid? If you fail to commit suicide do you really think getting arrested is on top of the list of your main problems?

      IP? I LIKE the fact that there is IP. That way content creators can get paid for their hard work.

      Speech? DMCA? Oh shit. So you mean I can't circumvent the security systems a company has implemented to protect their IP? Awwwww damn. I guess I'll just have to go kill myself now.

      Why didn't you also point out that we aren't free to kill, rape and steal? Could it be because a society agrees that there are certain things it will not allow individuals to engage in for the greater good? See the problem is you think freedom means being able to do anything you damn well please. Thats not freedom. Its just plain old anarchy and is incompatible with living in this or any society. You pointed out the DMCA and IP ones specifically because you want to pirate something someone else took the time to create without reimbursing them. Please forgive me if I don't agree with you that our freedom has been elminiated because you cannot engage in such activity illegally. Jesus. Grow the fuck up already. If it isn't the hippies, its the "Information wants to be free" cockfaces.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:free by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Well it works like this,

      People who think xyz are evil and should be shunned.
      so you keep your thoughts inside your head where know-one will see them.

      Are you free?

      In the EU it is a criminal offence to say the the holocast never happened, even if you believe that to be the case.

      You can't call that freedom?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:free by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      No one (or people who matter that is) really give a crap about any of that stuff.

      'or people who matter that is' see your brain washed!!!

      If you fail to commit suicide ..... you could be arrested in the UK for attempting suicide up until a few years ago.

      'IP? I LIKE the fact that there is IP' again you all washed up on the freedome side, take a look at the owl and the crow story on the wipeout site.

      Why didn't you also point out that we aren't free to kill, rape and steal?
      That's greed, you want to harm others. in the big picture killing takes more freedome from the killed than it gives to the killer. you've been brainwashed by greed so you'll probably never understand.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  93. Incidentally, its not the WWF... by pympdaddyc · · Score: 1

    Unless you *actually* meant the World Wildlife Fund, you meant to say WWE, aka World Wrestling Entertainment.

    The WWE lost their rights to the initials WWF in a recent lawsuit.

  94. Get better eyes and ears perhaps? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Your nothing short of a moron if you think regional and local flavor is lost in the US. The United STATES is not in any way shape or form a uniform society. People in the south are different from northeners, coastal folks differ from heartland folks, then there's the ethnic differences, religious differences, political differences, sexual differences......etc. Just because there's a McDonalds in every state does not mean we're all the same.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Get better eyes and ears perhaps? by ambisinistral · · Score: 1
      No kidding, when I read his post my jaw about dropped. I pictured some Brit driving from one McDonald to the next on the freeway thinking he had figured out The U.S. ,p> To the cultural comments... I once read a book of letters Vincent Van Gough wrote to his brother. He spent an extensive amount of time discussing the trendy Paris art scene of the day. 95 of the trend setter were people I had never heard of.

      when your immersed in a present, whatever that present is, most of it is vapid. Duchamp said, and he wasn't being insulting, that American art is engineering and bridges. I think in the long view he'll turn out to be right... a lot of the appeal of American culture is how we turned the industrial revolution from sweatshops to comfort. Never underestimate the appeal of comfort to folks who aren't pompous and self-loathing intellectuals.

      --

      deserve's got nothing to do with it...

    2. Re:Get better eyes and ears perhaps? by ambisinistral · · Score: 1
      Arghh. I really need to proff read better...

      No kidding, when I read his post my jaw about dropped. I pictured some Brit driving from one McDonald to the next on the freeway thinking he had figured out The U.S.

      To the cultural comments... I once read a book of letters Vincent Van Gough wrote to his brother. He spent an extensive amount of time discussing the trendy Paris art scene of the day. 95% of the trend setter were people I had never heard of.

      When your immersed in a present, whatever that present is, most of it is vapid.

      Duchamp said, and he wasn't being insulting, that American art is engineering and bridges. I think in the long view he'll turn out to be right... a lot of the appeal of American culture is how we turned the industrial revolution from sweatshops to comfort.

      Never underestimate the appeal of comfort to folks who aren't pompous and self-loathing intellectuals.

      --

      deserve's got nothing to do with it...

  95. Get real, I mean it. GET REAL by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Do you honestly talk about those issues EVERY DAMN DAY? How about every other day? In my office I have a co-worker who talks about those issues every day and at first it was refreshing and enlightening. Now its just plain annoying at times. You really think people want to discuss global and political issues everyday? Its not fun you know. And yes fun is important. If its not an enjoyable activity then folks won't engage in it willingly. So please don't blame it on apathy or sheep like behaviour. Blame it on people not liking to talk and discuss issues that are boring and suck.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  96. Old joke by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    What do I think of American culture?

    I think it would be a good idea.

    Yes, I know it's probably redundant, but if this joke has been posted here then the original is already at -1 and I didn't get a chance to enjoy it again. No culture, no sense of humour, no cuisine... no wonder you people wig out over Monty Python and pizza.

    1. Re:Old joke by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "No culture"
      apparently you have no dictionary:

      culture Pronunciation Key (klchr)
      n.
      The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.

      by definition, we have culture.
      If you mean arts, well we brought rock and roll to the world. We have produced some damn good movies. some greatmonuments.

      if you mean science, we brought you the internet, put many men on the moon, sent probes out into space, invented hook and loop fastners, etc, etc, etc.

      no sense of humour
      I'd like to see how you came up with this.

      no cuisine
      we have some og the best beef in the world. Some of the best Resturants in the world.

      Pizza is an american dish. It has roots in italy, but its is signifigantly different.

      we have a great many misro culutures, from little tokyo, to little italy. All this things are different facets of the american culture.

      We also have enough culture to understand that other countries produce thing we can enjoy as well, and not deride them of there contibution

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  97. Re:Wow...:P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes me wonder how some people can actually ask this question. If you don't think that it should be posted here, dont' fscking read it! that simple...just because it doesn't float YOUR boat doesn't mean that the other half million users here want find any intrigue or thought provoking discussions. ARen't nerds interested in the monopolistic mindcontrol seeking media companies who seek to control what the world watches and buys... this is one more step in that direction

  98. SEAsia all has the same culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that what you are trying to imply? Since you have been to SE Asia, you know what it is like in Bhutan? I hate to break it to you but all of SE Asia is not the same....besides I'd say Bhutan is in Central Asia anyway.

  99. Oh please by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Yeah cause American life is SO bad that there's so much of a reason to start a bloody revolution.

    (rolls eyes)

    Tell me when you progress beyond the Adolescent Black Block Counter-Culture phase and into Adulthood.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Oh please by cthulhu_will_rise · · Score: 1

      I was going to go to the revolution, but then I remembered that $show was going to on, so I blew it off. Heck, there'll be another. Maybe after I get a TiVo so I can time shift around the uprising.

  100. Niggers are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send 'em back to Africa (along with their Jewish handlers).

  101. Bastard by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot. Pro-Capitalist themes are not allowed. We only support the socialist morals of open source everythings. Nevermind that you need money to live or might not mind living in such a capitalist society. If you like making money, you are bad. If you don't mind others making money, you are bad. If you do not hate yourself for being a Westerner, you are bad. So please comply with the morals of this fair website. K THX BYE!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  102. Re:Hmm...differences... by cez · · Score: 1

    Overseas....lets see...anywhere....french...californian....french.. ..californian....french...californian...french...c alifornian...french...californian...FRENCH...CALIF ORNIAN...damn it wish it wasn't so hard to tell the difference between those two!

    --
    Walk with Music;
  103. try the wall plug!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You /. dinks are fucking brainwashed. Bhutan had no compulsion to allow television. As far as I know the networks do not own any aircraft carriers, so nobody stuck a gun in their face. Except maybe their citizens, who might have been pissed off at a government who thinks it can dictate whether they watch TV or not.

    American TV is popular with everybody, and why not? God forbid the poor bastards in Bhutan should see Bill Cosby living in a nice house in the suburbs and want that too.

    Get the fuck over it.

  104. This is what's good/bad about the West by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So these people get to watch adverts for cars/food/luxuries that they will not be able to purchase.

    Exactly. And plenty of folks there are going to want to purchase those things. [...]

    And in a few years they're gonna be waking up early every morning and going to a job they hate and busting their butt every friggin' day, just like you & me, to get all that stuff.

    Welcome to the west.
    Just as a thought experiment, I'd like to suggest that one of the great hallmarks of the West is exactly that -- dissatisfaction with who you are, where you are, and what you have.

    This produces drive. Drive to "get ahead", drive to "keep up with the Jonses", drive to get your butt off the sofa and finish that goddamn Great American Novel.

    That a side effect of this institutionalized dissatisfaction is a household full of unneeded, worthless goods is a small price to pay, sez I.
    1. Re:This is what's good/bad about the West by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      So true, so true. The main reason corporate america keeps doing invasive drug screening on prospective employees is to weed out the weed smokers.

      Pot smokers traditionally have little drive for working. They're usually happy to sit on the couch in front of a playstation and make bong loads disappear. If they're late for work, no worry. Miss a day or two? No worry. That's corporate america's biggest enemy: apathy. If you don't care about your job they have no power over you.

      I'm not saying all stoners are lazy bastards, but most stoners would rather do something creative (make a new bong out of odd materials or play hacky sack with friends) than go to work. I can't say I don't blame them. I had my own halcyon days that I'm beginning to miss. Damn this western world.

    2. Re:This is what's good/bad about the West by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I'd like to suggest that one of the great hallmarks of the West is exactly that -- dissatisfaction with who you are, where you are, and what you have.

      I'd suggest that it's not so much a great hallmark, as a great fundamental error of our society.

      This produces drive...to "get ahead", drive to "keep up with the onses"

      I'd rather have a drive to gain wisdom...to create beauty...to experience joy.

      Even if you win the rat race, you're still a rat. I have no desire to keep up with the Joneses - they're not even going where I want to go.

      That a side effect of this institutionalized dissatisfaction is a household full of unneeded, worthless goods is a small price to pay

      It's not a side effect. It's the main action. It's the effect desired by our government and industry - keep buying! Keep consuming more and more to keep the economy growing!

      But more and more people are declining to play.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:This is what's good/bad about the West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd like to suggest that one of the great hallmarks of the West is exactly that -- dissatisfaction with who you are, where you are, and what you have.

      I'd suggest that it's not so much a great hallmark, as a great fundamental error of our society.

      That a side effect of this institutionalized dissatisfaction is a household full of unneeded, worthless goods is a small price to pay

      It's not a side effect. It's the main action. [...]

      But more and more people are declining to play.
      I'm going to be really mean here and say that you're making my argument for me by following precisely those Western norms that make Western Civ. so great:
      dissatisfaction with who you are, where you are

      In other words, welcome to the most self-critical society on Earth! May your dissent make us all wiser.
  105. Culture without Quotes, dammit! by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    After all, in his day, Shakespeare's plays were considered to be for the common people. I don't mean to equate The Fast and the Furious with Hamlet, but I think we are too fast to dismiss anything other than 'high culture'.
    Ah, if only I had the power to mod you up!

    I have noticed some things here on slashdot and in general:

    1. There seems to be this huge, inexplicable cultural self-hatred among many Americans.
    2. People in foreign countries don't seem to have these reservations, after all they are importing American cultural artifacts.
    3. Intellectuals & artists in foreign countries are too busy decrying #2 to go out and produce something to compete
    3.a. A lot of #2 and #3 comes bagged with a sneering disdain for "the herd" and how stupid they are. How rude!

    Being an American, I think we have the Fish's Problem -- we are insufficiently aware of water. There is a cultural boom going of unprecedented proportions. Dozens of movies every year, hundreds of novels, original classical-style music (this slips unnoticed by most of these "culture"-bashing folks), uncounted plays, one-man shows, Burning Man festivals ... God! We're positively drowning in the stuff. [1]

    Sure, lots of it is dreck. What many people forget is that much of what was produced in the rennaissance sucked too, but we have the benefit of the historical filter... the stuff that wasn't so great quietly sank out of sight. A modern example... people are still talking about "Breakfast at Tiffany's", but "Dynasty" is already long-forgotten.

    I'm sure any of you can cite great recent novels, albums, movies, etc if you stop and think for a moment.

    Here's my challenge to you: tell me what recent -- say since 1900 -- pieces of culture (or "culture", if you will) will survive 100 more years. I'd love to hear some nominees.

    [1] A brief note about Disney... their politics may be bare-knuckled, but their movies typically rock, and their parks are awe-inspiring. The fake "Indiana Jones" temple probably took as much work as any real temple to build. But what they can't be forgiven for is how they distribute the classic Disney movies. How goddamn dare they take Cinderella off the market?! Sorry, I'll shut up now.
    1. Re:Culture without Quotes, dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right, good analysis. But I'd like to expand it to observe the following; what happens here is not _american_ pseudo-culture battling against other nationalities "true cultures". The battle is between genuine culture and massified, mass marketed culture. That battle is transnational. Genuine culture (generally) is a human phenomenon; wherever there are pens and ink (or a functional equivalent) there will be playwrights, writers, etc. But mass market culture is not. It is an artifact of (well) the markets, and the corporations that take part of them. In other words you could probably count on Pete Seger to appear by himself, but it takes the work of many a marketroid, plus many an image consultant, etc, to bring about a Britney, or N'Synch, or a Schwarzenegger movie.

      So in other words on the one hand you have regular people makign art/culture/whatever and on the other hand you have corporations making pseudo-art/psuedo-culture/etc. This of course is an oversimplification as it not really possible to always tell them appart any more, because the pre-mass media channels were wiped out long ago, so most genuine culture has to find their way through the mass media channels, or make new channels (like independent film festivals, etc). To put it another way, it's not really two things battling it. Rather, at this point, market and mass media has become a part of the path cultural expression has to take. Genuine expression has to fight to not lose its nature in the process. And in my opinion, those who succeed are the ones who will last. For example, Britney clearly will not last; but take P.K.Dick... that's a candidate for the centuries, IMHO.

      Now... since US is the dominant power, even hegemonic power in the world, most of the big corporations to be had on this planet are american. So it is only natural that if the 'fight' is between genuine artist expression and 'induced' mass-market corporate drect, most of the dreck will come from northamerica. If Bhutta or whatever had the most, richest media corporations, it would come from them instead.

      Part of the reason why it is viewed as an America Vs. Rest thing is because in the US by this point it is near impossible to find cultural expressoins outside of the massified channels. This is because you've had 50+ years of television, 90+ years of movie industry, etc. Pre-mass media art forms either converted or died. In other countries like Bhutta this hasn't happened yet. But it will, as it is a global historical process that can't be stopped by now.

      A final aside; there is nothing 'wrong' or inferior about liking mass-dreck or consuming it. Who doesn't like the cheap thrills of your latest Hollywood Schwarzeneggian every once in a while? What's wrong is confusing that for a genuine form of expression and depriving yourself of those. But genuine art isn't cheap or easy; it's usually hard, problematic, it takes work. It doesn't talk about Easy Villains and Easy Heroes, it talks about complex people or complex things, that usually resonate on you and make you think about yourself, your life, etc. So many people go without it.

      Well... their loss! :)

    2. Re:Culture without Quotes, dammit! by kavi_3 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Shakespere was writing to the mass market. Mass market culture may have a lot of shit, but that doesn't automatically invalidate it as culture.

      --
      "Attention Citizens, 2+2 now equals 3.947547175. Please recalibrate your equipment now" --The Computer
  106. If only it were true by drox · · Score: 2

    The U.S. has done better than many countries in these areas, but we're far from perfect. Bhutan is far from perfect too. It might be a good idea to consider American failings before allowing the American cultural Juggernaut to roll into one of the last places on the planet that it hasn't already been. That having been said, I doubt that television will be the death knell of Bhutan's culture. There is always the option of not buying a TV set, or not watching it if the village buys one.

    Still I do get tired of listening to defensive-sounding Americans brag about their culture. Like they invented all the things on that list.

    - trial by jury

    A good thing, if you can afford to get that far. Many more court cases are settled without trial (money buys justice) than ever go to trial.

    - women's rights

    U.S. laws protect women's rights to a degree, but there's still no equal rights amendment. And the laws' limited protection does not extend outside the U.S. The culture does, and the culture increasingly objectifies women. What I see happening is the exploitative culture is exported, while the laws that protect against the worst of the exploitation are not.

    - end of torture

    You might want to ask Amnesty International about that. The U.S. does not have a spotless track record, and often exports torture to other countries (avoiding for a moment the issue of whether Britney Spears videos ARE torture)

    - highly productive economy

    Which wouldn't look nearly so productive without the importation of cheap foreign-made goods, made by people who are, in every meaningful way, slaves.

    - separation of church and state

    On paper anyway.

    - education of the masses

    The why do American youth consistently score so very low compared to youth in other countries?

    - modern medicine

    Which is happily exported for a price... that few in Bhutan will ever be able to afford.

    - multicultural tolerance

    If Americans REALLY had multicultural tolerance they'd appreciate other cultures for more than just their restaurants and video games. They might actually learn more about other cultures than what their food tastes like and the names of all the Pokemon. And they wouldn't feel the need to crow all the time about how tolerant they are. It'd be a natural thing, like breathing.

    1. Re:If only it were true by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      U.S. laws protect women's rights to a degree, but there's still no equal rights amendment.

      Can you name another country that has an equal rights amendment?

      - separation of church and state

      On paper anyway.


      And in fact. Whatever fine details of the issue are argued out, the fact is that there is no state church (unlike, for example, England), religion is not taught in schools (except in small backwater towns) (unlike, for example, Germany) and religion cannot be a factor in many things (and usually isn't.)

      - education of the masses

      The why do American youth consistently score so very low compared to youth in other countries?


      If you're comparing the US high schools to the German gymnasium (which is what I understand has been done), then of course US students will score low, as high schools are for all, and the gymnasium is only for the brightest. A fair comparison of all German students with American high school students would reveal that American youth do better on SAT-type material - of course, because the majority of German students go to vocational-type schools.

      In other words, the US tries to educate the masses in a liberal-arts style; if you compare it to other countries that don't do that, your results, if meaningful, will make for lousy soundbytes. Easier just to slap a number on it and not think about the meaning.

  107. YAY! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    More self-hate! Please come kick my ass because I mistakenly woke up happy about myself!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  108. Southpark it by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    Let's pass a law that requires all exported media to be labeled as "Made in Canada".

    That way they will blame Canada instead of us. Of course, Canada will be pissed, but we can handle them.

    1. Re:Southpark it by krinsh · · Score: 1

      The most interesting thing is that a LOT of our television IS made in Canada. Highlander and X-Files are two that come to mind.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  109. damn right! by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    we haven't had a real (according to my 16 year-old) television for 8 years, though i do have a 9" color in the closet. he has told me that he really doesn't miss it! whenever i see one, say in a bar, i think i begin to glaze over. but, he does have an ibook, so life's not so bad.

  110. Don't Ghettoize the Bhutanese by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Interesting
    These fears aren't just about Bhutan. If anything, America faces as great a threat from the death of local culture as anywhere else. The only difference is that we delude ourselves into thinking that raking in money makes it all "okay."
    So ... um ...

    What's so great about local culture that it must be preserved At All Costs?

    What if these locals want to watch American television? Who are you to tell them that they are obligated to go meditate on snow or sing Bhutanese chants instead? Are the Bhutanese somehow obligated to maintain their current culture forever? What's it to you? And what happened to the idea of American culture being enriched by the contributions from abroad? Does it only work for us?

    I'm not trying to annoy here, this is a serious question. If so-called cultural imperialism is done by request of the imperialized, what's the damage?
  111. BS by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    1.-Most culture was not appreciated by those elitist classes you are talking about. They normally jumped in the bandwagon. Elites are conservative by nature, art is progressive by nature, both normally don't mix.

    2,- What you call "culture" in other parts of the world is a quasi racist attempt to pick into nasty things while ignoring great achivements elsewhere.

    3.-What you mention as American culture is not so. It can be more aptly described as American way of life.

    4.- IF American culture was democratic blacks and women would have more representation in all cultural fields, not only pop music.

    5.- What are you doing about your own elite?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:BS by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

      1.-Think Medicis
      2.-It ain't racist, or even quasi-racist, if it's so. At that point it's an uncomfortable truth for the politically correct.
      3.-Way of life. Culture. What's the diff?
      4.-Oprah.
      5.-I'm have a barbeque tomorrow. Fatty meat and Budweiser. Yummy.

      Th point is that in most of the world, life is mostly vicious, bloody, and short, except for a small elite that occasionally also sponsors the art that becomes viewed as the culture.

      America's broken that. The culture is actually in the hands of the middle class, which has totally bought into life as the pursuit of happiness.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
  112. What I think will survive: by asreal · · Score: 1

    I'm missing a lot, but here are a few starters:

    Will be remembered:

    • WWF/WWE/Professional Wrestling
    • Miles Davis
    • Fight Club - probably the film more than the novel
    • George Orwell - 1984 and Animal Farm among others
    • Punk
    • Dance/Club/Rave Culture (at least parts)
    • Tolkien
    • The Price is Right
    • Pablo Picasso
    • Andy Warhol
    • Bauhaus
    • David Carson


    Won't be remembered:

    • Prefab Pop (Britney + Nsync + BSB, particularly)
    • Who Wants To Be A Millionaire
    • Master of Disguise
    • AYB references



    Other cultural predictions:

    • Robot retro - AIBO and predecessors fetch huge sums from vintage robot collectors.
    • PC retro - refitting ugly beige cases to house digital devices.
    • Musicmachines - Pop music composed and performed by digital stars, RIAA introduces bill banning non-organic musicians.

    1. Re:What I think will survive: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to add to the list of what will be remembered:
      Arcades
      Jazz

      I would remove Fight Club, Raves, Punk, and Bauhaus from that list, however.

    2. Re:What I think will survive: by Saeger · · Score: 2
      Musicmachines - Pop music composed and performed by digital stars, RIAA introduces bill banning non- organic musicians.

      You're right on about that one - for at least some types of music isn't too terribly difficult to automatically sythesize on-the-fly according to taste.

      Also, I'd add "Pornmachines" to that list a little later... then I'd get to be director. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:What I think will survive: by asreal · · Score: 1

      Now that I think about it, banning non-organic musicians won't be enough.. they'll ban non-organic musicians that they don't have a gene sequence patent on. Bleh.

  113. Dude, you're going to hell. . . by dasboy · · Score: 1

    Damn, they got a localized version of Windows last week (ok, 2003, but it was announced last week, see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2164186.stm) , and now they get television. Bhutan is going to hell in a hurry.

  114. old. by nanoakron · · Score: 1

    Umm....according to the article, they legalised TV in 1999.

    I guess 3 years late is still pretty on-the-fly for /., though.

    -Nano.

  115. Pop Quiz: by SuuSt · · Score: 2

    When I say WWF what do you think of first:
    a) World Wrestling Federation
    b) World Wildlife Fund

    Aparently British courts believe that most people will answer B and have ruled that the (now) WWE no longer use WWF as people might confuse it with the World Wildlife Fund. It's obviously a bunch of white hairs (literally) frowning upon that rubbish on television in favor of the much more civilized environmentalists. It's not at all different than the myriad domain disputes that populate Slashdot, only this time both companies are big, its just that one is being discriminated against based on their content.

    Of course I don't seriously expect the Slashdot crowd to care about wrasslin', but it's interesting to see that all courts can be dumb when deciding who gets to use what name, not just domain name courts.

    1. Re:Pop Quiz: by k_187 · · Score: 2

      It's obviously a bunch of white hairs (literally) frowning upon that rubbish on television in favor of the much more civilized environmentalists.

      That and the fact that the World Wildlife Fund has been using the monkier WWF longer than the World Wrestling Federation.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:Pop Quiz: by SuuSt · · Score: 2

      I wasn't going to respond to this until I came to a rather unsettling realization. You are of course right when you say that the World Wildlife Fund had the name first, I'll even grant that they used the acronym first though I'm not sure. Whats got me botehred though, is that I much like a great many other people, applied a good old doulbe standard. I'd rather WWE be able to use the WWF moniker and the World Wildlife Fund just not worry about it. WWE certainly didn't have any complaints with the World Wildlife Fund using the name, the Fund are the folks who made it a binary issue.

      But that's not really the point, the point is that the World Wildlife Fund has as much right to the name as Nissan Computers has to nissan.com. They've got a name, they weren't piggybacking off another companies success, and they got there first. Those are usually the criteria we use when defending some guy with a URL. The wrestling use of WWF is certainly better known, but that argument is the very one we deride when judging cases like the one of nissan.com. Sue nissan motors is better known than nissan computers, but nissan computers has just as much right to the name as the car company.

      So effectively what I've done is picked the guy who I want to win, and geared an argument to defend him. Certainly not uncommon in the world today. Perhaps, and here I'll begin rambling so bear with me or just stop reading, its the fact that the World Wildlife Fund filed the suit claiming the (then) World Wrestling Federation could no longer use their name of 20+ years. At this point I've been conditioned to believe that whoever files a suit is a greedy petty twit who deserves to loose. Stand up comics, SNL, and goobers sueing because McDonalds made them fat have done that. Of course there's lots of valid suits like when my car blows up and kills my dog or something, then that's okay, but the instant I hear "lawsuit" I just say "uggghh..." and tune out. I"m not going to foward a consipiracy theory about how this helps large corps, but it is at least lucky :) Mostly though, it's telling of me, and whoever may be similar to me in this regard.

      Thanks for bearing with me on that. So in conclusion, crow tastes remarkably like chicken...

  116. No escape from the CULTURE by The+Eating+Gorilla+C · · Score: 1

    The introduction of television is going to change the culture, i.e. what most people think about and dream about. This WILL affect everyone in the culture profoundly, because of its influence on neighbors, employers, co-workers, politicians (the 1960 election, anyone?), etc. An individual's decision to turn the TV off does not change that- it's a "head in the sand" response.

    1. Re:No escape from the CULTURE by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      An individual's decision to turn the TV off does not change that- it's a "head in the sand" response.

      It doesn't directly change what happens to the culture, no. But it changes what happens to you, so it's not in any way a "head in the sand" response. And by changing yourelf, you have made a very small change in the culture...one that might even propagate. ("Hey, you see Survivor last night?" "Nope. I was reading Walden." "What's that about?" "Let me tell you. You want to borrow my copy?")

      Yes, I watch TV, but just like any other drug I set parameters to make sure my use stays healthy.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:No escape from the CULTURE by The+Eating+Gorilla+C · · Score: 1

      Well, OK, it's not literally sticking your head in the sand, but it amounts to the same thing. Your action of sharing Walden, well-intentioned as it is, is a drop in the ocean vs. multi-million dollar advertising, marketing, economic pressures etc. A drop in the ocean is better than nothing, but in the long run it will probably amount to nothing.

  117. Toleration by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Toleration does not mean "agreement". You can tolerate something/someone and absolutely, totally, 100% disagree and dislike that thing or person for whatever reason you choose to.

    Don't confuse the issue. Your metaphors about blacks living in white communities and young couples living in older communities is flawed. There IS tolerance there. There just isn't agreement. I think it is safe to say that the USA has a pretty darn good system for addressing disagreement. I mean, we have a reasonably non-violent approach to disagreement (at least domestically amongst ourselves). Sure there is intolerance in spots but for the most part, I think tolerance is very well ingrained in people these days.

  118. And then there is Turkmenistan by woolite · · Score: 1

    Turkmenistan is taking new steps to limit the amount of information coming into the country from the outside world. President Saparmurat Niyazov said this week that law enforcement agencies need to work toward shutting down what Niyazov said were "illegal" cable hook-ups. Niyazov also said satellite dishes on rooftops in the capital Ashgabat make the city look ugly and ordered they be removed.
    Central Asia Times

  119. Culture...WTF is Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an American, I enjoy the freedom and privledges that come with being an American. I watch TV shows because I like watching "The Agency", "BattleBots", "The History Channel", and "FOX Sports World". I guess I'm not the kind of guy that cares much about commercials, I'll still drink Coke no matter how many Pepsi commercials come on. Maybe if these Bhutanese (sp?) people watch some TV, they just might learn something that they wouldn't have learned otherwise. TV can be a great teacher, if we don't waste our time watching shows that are meaningless (sitcoms, Baywatch).

    I guess I just don't see how watching TV is going to drastically change their culture, I watch Iron Chef almost every week and not once have I had the desire to eat raw fish.

    Us Americans have it pretty darn nice, and we had it nice before we had TV too (or so my Grandmother says).

    The Europeans should just shut up and stop whining about how terrible "American Culture" is. If it weren't for the USA everyone in Europe would be speaking German. Have you heard most of the music coming from Europe these days, it makes Brittney Spears sound "artistic". Also, stop blaming us for the crap movies, we don't like most of them either. Also, note to Europeans: quit whining about McDonalds, if you don't like it, don't eat there, I don't, neither should you. American culture is what you fucking make of it, and that is why you dopes won't ever understand it.

  120. Re: The Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's making fun of a certain kind of asshole. But I think it's wrong of you to assume he is that kind of asshole, or an asshole at all.

    Anyone who can truly appreciate The Simpsons, I think, is not the asshole to which you refer.

    And throughout, I don't think The Simpsons is very derogatory towards that kind of "asshole". They just sort of point out irony and silly situations.

  121. Re:Hmm...differences... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

    And there you fell for the trap. Hook line and sinker! Thanks...

    The problem is that you think that French and California Cabris are two single distinct entities. When in fact a California Cabris is a single grower with a trademark like Coca Cola and a French Cabris has many growers. And just like you said now with your diference you will associate one bad French Cabris as all French Cabris being bad, since there is only a French Cabris and a Californian Cabris.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  122. Hahaha by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I don't even want to think about that.

    I get my valuesystem from the web and thats the way I likes it

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Hahaha by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  123. Well, not exactly by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Taliban Afghanistan banned television before legalized it. So you could have moved from Butan to Afghanistan. If you wanted to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Well, not exactly by The+Evil+Beaver · · Score: 1

      Well, they can't really count since the Taliban don't control Afghanistan any more. Now it's under the control of America (although indirectly). Not to make this any more politically charged or anything, just had to be said.

      --
      Chris 'coldacid' Charabaruk Meldstar Entertainment
  124. Re: opposites by Sharkeys-Day · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is the opposite of "pro-life"?

    "anti-life" or "pro-death"?

  125. The problem with Coke. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    APart from the health issues of marketing
    caffeinated sugar water, there's the Coke
    company's responsibility for the decline of
    Indonesia's tea-related traditions, for example.

    1. Re:The problem with Coke. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      1. There are no health issues in marketing caffeinated sugar water, only health issues from drinking TOO MUCH of such a product.

      2. My point was Coke is a nice American tradition. I didn't say it was a good tradition in Indonesia. Apparantly people like Coke more than tea, that's what happens when people are exposed to more choices. As far as I know, you are still able to observe tea-related traditions in Indonesia if you'd like.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  126. Exactly! by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    And the same applies to Native Americans
    and many others in the US. Soon the Bhutanese
    will decide what is worth preserving and
    they will hold on to it despite having
    ready access to things like WWF.

  127. yeh by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    But they didn't lose controll untill 2001, so you could have goten 2 more years of of freedom from other people watching TV if you had wanted to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  128. Whoa whoa whoa hotshot... by krinsh · · Score: 1

    I and my wife and kids watch "wrasslin'", and I've been a big fan ever since I met the Von Erics when I was ten. And before you criticize; the kids KNOW it is entertainment and not combat instruction. I happen to be a huge, huge fan of the weekly web commentary provided by Jim Ross, one of their major Vice Presidents. The business is just as fun as watching the show... even though we do make fun of some of the audience sometimes.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    1. Re:Whoa whoa whoa hotshot... by SuuSt · · Score: 2

      Sorry if I gave the impression that I was insulting wrestling, I use the term "wrasslin" purley out of affection. Though this is neither the topic nor the forum, I've got the karma to burn so who cares. I too am a fan of our beloved "sports entertainment" even during the last year or so of its doldrums. I've watched the mess that was the ungodly wcw/ecw invasion and the crap that followed. All so I could occasionally get a good Kurt Angle or Chris Benoit match.

      Wrestling is one of those interesting things (at least to me) whose value can't really be explained. It's grown men in their underwear pretending to fight, and yet theres something more to it. Something that makes 4 hours of crappy television worth 15 minutes of gold. In few other venues of entertainment would the fans say "this products sucks and I do not enjoy watching it," and yet continue to watch. It's because at some point, be it when you met the much maligned Von Erics, or when I saw the Undertaker debut (on TV, never been to a live show) something so enjoyable happens that you're desperate to get that back.

      I'm a fan of football and baseball, yet what are often heralded as some of the greatest moments in those sports (such as Oaklands game saving catch over the wall a couple of nights ago) can't begin to compare with the elation I feel when watching RVD and Eddie Gurrero in a ladder match. I knew who was going to win that match before it started, just like you know the good guy is going to win at the end of practically every movie you see, but it's the process of getting from the beginning to the inevitable end that you're interested in.

      Saddly, it seems like the true artists in wrestling have never really gotten their fair shake in the big times, they sit somewhere in the middle of the card providing the real entertainment, while the guys who can talk decently get the top story lines and drive the shows. Granted it would probably be a dull time if all we got was technical wrestling. After all, we need to have some idea of why these two men in their underwear are pretending to fight.

      Anyway, all that aside, I don't "suggest" anyone try to like wrestling. It's like Linux or vi, you know what it is and what it's all about. If your the kind of person who would be interested in one of those things you'll eventually find your way to, no amount of forcing someone to use either or watch wrestling is going to make them like it.

    2. Re:Whoa whoa whoa hotshot... by SuuSt · · Score: 2

      I find it funny that despite my defence of it, and how much I enjoy parts of wrestling, stating such things still caries a stigma like no other. You can be a fan of allot of silly or lude things and not get half the ridicule you'll draw by stating you are a fan of wrestling. Everyone just assumes your that you're an idiot who thinks it's real, or phenominally childish. I guess wrestling earned it's reputation though, considering such a large amount of the show is very childish... oh well, such is life.

    3. Re:Whoa whoa whoa hotshot... by krinsh · · Score: 1

      Hey thanks for that! You know; I think you are right that the better 'performers' stay at the middle of the card, but like I said I read Jim Ross's report frequently and you know they try and work on the "character" aspects of everyone that is willing, especially the speaking parts, to get them in front of the audience and give them a chance to shine.

      Yes, it may be a performance but I know they often *do* hurt each other and they put a lot of physical effort into entertaining their fans.

      Enough offtopic stuff before someone wastes a mod or five on us... *L*

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  129. Bhutan's culture by bgspence · · Score: 1

    I visited Bhutan a little over a year ago. It really does resemble Shangri-La. It not only is the size of Switzerland, it looks like it. The houses remind me very much of Swiss chalets with their barn like attics open to the air.

    The country is amazingly well maintained. Very tidy and neat for a country just coming out of the middle ages. There are white painted stones along the cliffside highways perfectly evenly placed. If a stone is knocked out of the way, someone walking down the road will simply put it back into place.

    It is a Buddhist monastic society. Ancient historic monasteries everywhere with links to some of the most important Buddhist masters.

    We were in Paro the day the first Internet café opened there. Paro is the town with the only airport, so is the first and sometimes only place visitors get to. Thimphu already had Internet access. It is the capitol and largest city.

    The people are wonderful. And education is a top priority. It is a very peaceful society, but changing rapidly.

    The temples do not allow photography inside for fear of providing outsiders of pictorial inventories of the priceless artifacts inside. In the previous year a group of Bhutanese bandits from the east looted a temple, killing the monks who did not escape. This would have been an imaginable event only a few years ago. Desire for wealth obtainable by selling religious artifacts is overtaking the traditional values of the culture.

    A simple Buddhist culture, with its sane attitude toward the human problem of desire, stands little chance of surviving the desire machine being unleashed there. Western media is the engine of materialism. I fear that western corporate monoculture will win over the minds of youth there in just a couple of generations. An alternate form of human social existence will then be lost.

  130. Re:Hmm...differences... by cez · · Score: 1

    no, not what I had in mind. I was referring to the actual choosing of the Cabris from your local wonderful liquor store. Choosing wise...hmmm I think I'll try this Cabris...1 says CALIFORNIA, the other 10 say Product de Francais or something like that. If one tastes a specific wine and doesn't like it and then rashly rules out all others in the same genre (Right word for wine?)let alone vintage or country of origination, as distasteful then he/she should not be drinking wine.

    --
    Walk with Music;
  131. The American Gov't didn't force TV on them by wessman · · Score: 1

    It's not like the American gov't is sending gov't officials or military to force other countries or regions to adopt American culture or trends. If a remote and traditional culture wants to embrace culture or technology from any other nation or culture, that is their choice (unless there are guns involved, which there weren't here).

  132. WWE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reciently after a long battle the World Wildlife Fund(WWF) won there case against the
    World Wrestling Fedoration(WWF)

    the World Wrestling Fedoration is now
    World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)