Slashdot Mirror


Tracking Your Employees, Children

Mattygfunk writes "Hong Kong has launched what's believed to be Asia's first location-based service which enables companies to locate their employees via their mobile phones signals." And in a semi-related story, Son-of-a-Geek writes "The BBC is reporting on a new GPS device for kids from Wherify Wireless. With the new device parents can track junior or he can call for help by pushing a panic button. Available only in the US for one penny less than 400 dollars it is a pager as well."

191 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. I get it... by Alpha42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So for just 399.99, I can have a little electro-gizmo that will do the job that I, as a parent, should have been doing all along (Tracking where little Johnny is, and what mischief he's been into)..

    Lovely.

    (Don't get me wrong, I'm all for electro-gizmos, but I also believe that parents should be responsible for just that... parenting.)

    1. Re: I get it... by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No parent can be there 100% of the time for their child. In the past six months, kids have been taken from their bedrooms, school yards, as well as their front yard.

      It maybe "en vogue" to blast parents for their irresponsibility, but there are some things that all parents are defensless against.

      I have a little girl coming this January, and I'm terrified. We live in a world full of sick and twisted individuals and there are practical limits to what parents can do to protect their children.

      Hell, my parents were the best parents anyone could hope for, but that doesn't mean they were permanently adjoined to my hip 24x7. I was often alone at the bus stop. Sometimes I decided to walk home from school or from a friends house. I would periodically walk to the store less than 1000ft from my house. And sometimes, I would run off somewhere to do something they expressly forbade me to do.

      I think this device, as is, is perfect for its target market, small children. For my teenager, I would prefer a device that they could turn on and off, so that they can control when it should act like a distress beacon. There comes a time, where you have to respect your kids right to be a kid.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    2. Re:I get it... by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      So for just 399.99, I can have a little electro-gizmo that will do the job that I, as a parent, should have been doing all along (Tracking where little Johnny is, and what mischief he's been into)..

      Has anyone considered that someone who snatches a child may take the precaution of taking such devices off them and throwing them away?

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:I get it... by Pedersen · · Score: 2
      There's this little thing called kidnapping. Someday, you should consider looking into it. Now, I'm not sure of the exact number of missing children in this country, but I do know it's at least 6 digits.


      The reality is that there are any number of ways for a stranger to grab a hold of your child. I've seen studies (and video tapes) which show that a complete stranger can kidnap a child in under 60 seconds off a playground. Now, imagine a pair of mothers taking their children to the playground (especially if one of them has two children). Being people, the mothers might actually start talking to each other. Now, how easy would it be for a potential kidnapper to grab one of their children? And you would blame the mother for this?


      It's not about a parent doing (or not doing) their job. It's about being able to undo the damage done by unscrupulous individuals as quickly as possible. Keep that in mind.

      --

      GPL made simple: What was my stuff is now our stuff. If you improve our stuff, please keep it our stuff.
    4. Re:I get it... by lythander · · Score: 2

      Except it can only do it where your PCS phone will work. Look at the coverage map, the feind planning to nip your progeny surely has.

    5. Re:I get it... by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      The device was created with a lock. Of course the sick bastard could just cut the kids hand off, you have to hope that either A) he doesn't realize what it is. or b) recognizes what it is and simply leaves your kid alone.

      Of course, an unselfish/noble individual would prefer (A) and that the guy is caught quickly before any harm is done, but I think many parents would be happy with (B).

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    6. Re:I get it... by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      You're confusing the two techs discussed. The employee tracking uses cell phones. The kid watch uses GPS.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    7. Re:I get it... by gowen · · Score: 1
      There's this little thing called kidnapping. ... Now, I'm not sure of the exact number of missing children in this country, but I do know it's at least 6 digits.
      And only a tiny percentage of them have anything to do with kidnapping. The vast majority of missing children have left home voluntarily, and I'd imagine that very few of them would choose to take their electronic tag with them.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    8. Re: I get it... by Alpha42 · · Score: 1

      "In the past six months, kids have been taken from their bedrooms, school yards, as well as their front yard."

      Just for the record, kids have always been snatched up by sick and twisted individuals. It's just that within the last six months it's suddenly become "en vogue" to broadcast it on the six oclock news once again since there's apparently nothing better going on in the world. Kids have been kidnapped for decades, and they always will be, sometimes from the most caring and protective of households, I'm not debating that, I'm saying that any device with claims to 'assist' the situation is only going to make it worse, as it takes yet another responsibility off the parental units.

      "Hell, my parents were the best parents anyone could hope for... And sometimes, I would run off somewhere to do something they expressly forbade me to do."

      And you're still here to talk about it today right? Your parents cared, where there, and you still managed to put yourself into situations that could have resulted in your being hurt and/or abducted (it's okay, we all did it at sometime, don't sweat it) So what's the problem? The problem is that some clueless moron will buy one of these things, strap it to his kid, and assume "hey, the kids got the beeper, I can run off to the bar with the guys and chill, if anything goes wrong, they can set it off."... then little Johnny procedes to burn the house down, get run over, or get manhandled by the local priest, and clueless moron dad will sue said company and anyone within armreach claiming "They said it would protect little Johnny!"... Trust me, it WILL happen.

      Stopping kids from getting hurt is all well and good, having one of these is fine, as long as you don't for a second let yourself be disillisioned into thinking that it's really anything other then a "Toy" that your kid will undoubtly take apart to tinker with, trade to a friend for some baseball cards, or leave at home on the dresser on a regular basis. Not to mention that they'll never carry it anywhere once they get old enough to realize that "Mom and Dad know where I'm at when I've got this thing with me!" I guess I should have explained myself better in my original post... not all parents are bad parents, and not eveyrone who'd buy one of these is going to be an idiot about it.. but I'm just so tired and sick of watching people these days find new ways to pawn their responsibility off onto others and/or gadgest...

    9. Re:I get it... by Patman · · Score: 2

      The vast majority of missing children in this country non-stranger abductions.

      This device will do nothing. Any child who wants to get it off or get away from it will. And any kidnapper with half a brain would
      get rid of this thing. It's not like it's tacked on.

      There is *no* substitute for a parent. Should you give your kids freedom? Yes. But you should still know where they are, where they're going, and how they're getting there.

      Don't depend on a 400 dollar piece of equipment to do what you should be doing.

    10. Re:I get it... by Alpha42 · · Score: 1

      You know, I know I'm getting a very negative outlook on life and the people in it, because, as you noted above, the website says that "The device is made of a sturdy yet soft rubberized material, which is cut resistant. Should anyone try to cut or tamper with the band when the device is locked, an alarm will be activated at our Location Service Center and the subscriber will be notified." and my very first thought after this was; of course if the pervert chops little Johnnys hand off and tosses the whole thing out the car window, in which case the point is moot.

      Depressing how this world has taught me to think. ;) But atleast someone else out there was thinking it too, so I don't have to feel tooo bad.

    11. Re:I get it... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2

      "...It's not like it's tacked on..."

      Don't give them any ideas. Pretty soon the paranoids will be right and people will have the ol'tracking microchip implanted under their skin at birth.

      I'm lucky though... I move so little that they would assume the chip was broken.

      Safety through sloth-

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    12. Re:I get it... by sheriff_p · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      it's not like it's tacked on

      Uh, well actually it is. Try reading the link, retardo. Even if the kidnapper does realise what it is, and tries to take it off (triggering the alarm at the same time, I might add), that leaves the last known position of the kid, having been abducted. That's very very useful information for law-enforcement agencies trying to track the missing child down.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    13. Re:I get it... by bobthemuse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Watch uses GPS to receive location, still needs method to transmit the coordinates back to the parents. I think the article said GPRS?

    14. Re:I get it... by Patman · · Score: 2

      Uh, well actually it is. Try reading the link, retardo.

      Try reading it yourself. It's a wristwatch. Real easy to remove.

    15. Re:I get it... by shaper · · Score: 2

      So for just 399.99, I can have a little electro-gizmo that will do the job that I, as a parent, should have been doing all along (Tracking where little Johnny is, and what mischief he's been into)..

      You're either not a parent and/or have not thought the problem through very well. What about school? What about field trips? What about sleep-overs and birthday parties and outings with friends? What about visiting with Grandma and Grandpa? What about taking 15 seconds to roll the shopping cart away from your vehicle, turning around and seeing someone making off with your kid????

      One cannot watch a child 100% of the time. Indeed, as a child ages, s/he should be gradually given more autonomy as part of normal development. My oldest just started kindergarten yesterday. I am not sure what all of the question is or whether something like this device is even part of an answer, but as my children grow this stuff sure does seem to strike a resonant chord in me. Life is a lot more complicated than simple slogans like "Parents should be parents!"

    16. Re: I get it... by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Just for the record, kids have always been snatched up by sick and twisted individuals. It's just that within the last six months it's suddenly become "en vogue" to broadcast it on the six oclock news once again since there's apparently nothing better going on in the world.

      Whether or not its being reported more or less, doesn't detract from the fact that there is a problem. And many of the cases reported recently were such big stories because of the audacity with which the crimes were staged. Some of the more recent stories, I will readily admit were more hysteria driven, like the shark attack stories last year. In many of those cases, this device would not have been of much help, except maybe the little girl in Philly, who fortunately got away in the end anyways.

      Kids have been kidnapped for decades, and they always will be, sometimes from the most caring and protective of households, I'm not debating that, I'm saying that any device with claims to 'assist' the situation is only going to make it worse, as it takes yet another responsibility off the parental units.

      I'm not saying that this tool is going to eliminate adbuctions. I am not saying that this device should be used as a form of babysitter for bad parents, because the truth is bad parents are going to be bad parents with or without this device. At the risk of sounding like some politician :) , its the children I'm concerned about. If this device can save the lives of a handful of children who would otherwise be dead, then the tool can hardly be making the situation worse.

      Stopping kids from getting hurt is all well and good, having one of these is fine, as long as you don't for a second let yourself be disillisioned into thinking that it's really anything other then a "Toy" that your kid will undoubtly take apart to tinker with, trade to a friend for some baseball cards, or leave at home on the dresser on a regular basis. Not to mention that they'll never carry it anywhere once they get old enough to realize that "Mom and Dad know where I'm at when I've got this thing with me!" I guess I should have explained myself better in my original post... not all parents are bad parents, and not eveyrone who'd buy one of these is going to be an idiot about it.. but I'm just so tired and sick of watching people these days find new ways to pawn their responsibility off onto others and/or gadgest...

      I agree with you completely, but the important thing is this device is no different than a car seat. If Joe Idiot wants to put a rear-facing seat facing forward, or any seat in the front passenger seat, then they have just graduated to the class of BAD parent. But, just because some idiot should have gotten a vasectomy at age 13, doesnt mean we should not bother with them.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    17. Re:I get it... by sheriff_p · · Score: 2

      Before you further reveal your ignorance:

      http://www.wherifywireless.com/faq.asp#27
      http: //www.wherifywireless.com/faq.asp#28

      I'd suggest you read those. Thanks!

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    18. Re:I get it... by soapvox · · Score: 1

      It is not easy to remove, I have played with one of these. If you try to take it off while it is locked then a alert is sent to the call center, but the watch wont come off (unless you do what the previous poster a few comments up said).

    19. Re: I get it... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      Consider for a moment that it may not be that there is nothing else going on in the world, and that it is simply the fact that its because people are sick of hearing about what IS going on in the world.. for the past 12 months its been Israel this, War on Terrorism that. The distractionary group we USians are, we need a new outrage every so often or we get bored.

      Meanwhile, on the back page, the conservatives are tapping your phone.

    20. Re:I get it... by Patman · · Score: 2

      Before you further reveal your ignorance:

      I read that, too. Note it said 'cut-resistant', not 'cut-proof'. All that means is that
      it's not coming of with the greatest of ease.

      Besides, this is market-speak. I still submit that cutting
      these things off wrists would be a lot easier than
      the site makes it out to be.

    21. Re:I get it... by sheriff_p · · Score: 1

      You suggested that young kids could take them off and lend them to their friends. Note also how an alarm is triggered when it's cut.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    22. Re: I get it... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      It's also important to remember that a vast majority of kidnappings and sexual abuse are committed by family members, not strangers. Those just don't make for good headlines or movies of the week.

      -B

    23. Re:I get it... by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 2, Informative


      You're confusing the two techs discussed. The employee tracking uses cell phones. The kid watch uses GPS.

      A GPS receiver tells *you* your current location, and no one else. A cellphone (or other similar device) is still required to report that position back to the control center. That's where the PCS issue comes from: you need its coverage to broadcast the current position

    24. Re:I get it... by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      For the past two summers I've been a counselor at a summer camp. For a week at a time, I am responsible for the well-being of 7-9 children. It is my responsiblilty to know where my campers are at all times, and when you have those little buggers running around, wanting to run off in to the woods, wanting to talk to girls, wanting to run off into the woods with girls, it can be kind of a pain to keep track of all of them. On a more searious note, I know at camps around the country every summer a few campers die, and it seems like something like this could prevent some of those deaths.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    25. Re:I get it... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      I can garauntee I have a 6 year old cousin who can get this thing off without tripping the alarm UNLESS the alarm goes off whenever it's no longer in skin contact. Heck, I can slip police issue handcuffs without half trying...
      The alarm going off is a minor issue in the grand scheme of things. Removing the watch means you get the kids last known position, which was probably known by someone anyways... So I really doubt this is going to help anyone that much.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    26. Re:I get it... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      1. Do not send your children places with people you do not trust.

      2. When you go places, leave your young children at home with someone you DO trust.

      These two simple rules will knock out a lot of this problem, as well as letting me grocery shop or watch a movie without your little vermin screaming and banging into things.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    27. Re:I get it... by shaper · · Score: 2

      These two simple rules will knock out a lot of this problem, as well as letting me grocery shop or watch a movie without your little vermin screaming and banging into things.

      If you had actually read my post with more than a single functioning brain cell, you might have noticed that everyone I mentioned leaving my kids with would have some level of presumed trust relationship with me and my kids, e.g. Grandma and Grandpa, school and friends whose parents I know and trust. Also, although there is no such thing as a 100% solution, that still doesn't stop me from looking for one, or at least better ones than I have now. Finally, as you evidently didn't notice, I did NOT endorse this device. I, too, have serious reservations about its efficacy. However, its goal of being able to locate your child in an emergency is a laudable one and it is that goal with which I most sympathize.

      As for the "little vermin" comment, well, just be glad that you did not make that comment to me or any other parent in their actual physical presence.

      Later, troll boy.

    28. Re:I get it... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Buddy, if your kid is screaming at the top of his lungs in the grocery store while I'm trying to pick up my groceries I'll call him a lot worse than that, and then I'll denounce you for not raising your kid to be a decent human being.
      I'm not a troll, I'm just not kidcentric. I realize you weren't endorsing the device. But if you don't trust your kids teachers, etc... that's not something that can be solved by this device, or any other locator system. Knowing your kids location does not stop bad things from happening to your kid. And heck, what are you going to do? Watch the monitor 24/7 to make sure your kid isn't going somewhere he isn't supposed to be? What if some stranger offers the kid 20$ to get in his car, it's not an emergency to the kid. He hops in, is overcome physically, tied up, still no alarm, abused, killed, and burried in a shallow grave. At which point I doubt you are getting any signal from the bracelet since most of this would be done indoors or some similar shielded area, or well out of range of the PCS network this thing relies on. So you've got a totally ineffective device that MIGHT let you locate your kids body. Woohoo....
      And a lot of peopls kids ARE little vermin, for sure. If yours aren't great. You're doing your job.
      Breeding should not be a right! You should have to go through the same process to have a biokid as you do to adopt.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    29. Re:I get it... by shaper · · Score: 2

      Thank you. Much better points this time around. I find that I agree at least partially with most of them, hence my own misgivings about the technology. Given that I am the father of 3 little girls, I am probably more rabidly kidcentric than many, especially in light of recent events in the USA. So even though my rational mind agrees with your misgivings in this approach, something in me wants to find something like this that works. Guess I'm doomed to a life of worry, eh? :-)

    30. Re:I get it... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Spiked Chainmail. With padlocks. Get your kids some chainmail with 6 inch razor sharp spikes and padlock it on them. No one will be abusing/molesting them then! That's for sure.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  2. Excellent! by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

    Now I just need to buy my wife a 'pager'. ;p

    1. Re:Excellent! by inburito · · Score: 1

      Just make sure it has a vibrating alert and she might even want you to page her.. :-)

    2. Re:Excellent! by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1

      No problem, she'll just leave it in the parking lot until she gets back from my house. ;)

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
  3. for 399.99 by reshu-wan-kenobi · · Score: 2, Informative

    You too can have a device any smart kid would leave at home..

    1. Re:for 399.99 by Jondor · · Score: 2

      yeah, or have an "accident"..

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    2. Re:for 399.99 by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      or just leave it at "billy's house" and then go off an create mischief...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    3. Re:for 399.99 by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      I think that is why they put a lock on it. Also so that Joe Likesmallchildren can't take it off either.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    4. Re:for 399.99 by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Only if you're a wimpy parent who can't discipline your kid. I'm not saying I would use something like this, but if I did, it's simple to make sure he doesn't forget.

      Johnny, this is the rule: "You forget, you are grounded for the next week.". Problem solved.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:for 399.99 by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      In an geek-child episode the response would be:

      "So?"

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
    6. Re:for 399.99 by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      And the proper reply would be "OK, two weeks". If the kid wants to escalate it, that's fine. No TV. No computer. No door on your room.

      And if I had to implement the ultimate punishment, then so be it. I'll with him to school, and follow the kid around. He'll be begging for mercy after the first period.

      Trust me, I'll win.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    7. Re:for 399.99 by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      ...so long as you don't place too much value on having any sort of relationship with you children when they're old enough to tell you to fuck off and make it stick.

      Oh, bullshit. In fact, it's exactly the opposite -- the best way to lose your kid's respect is to not enforce any discipline and be wishy-washy on the rules you set down. Then they just see you as weak willed.

      The key is consistent rules and discipline. They should know what the rules are, and what the consequences are for breaking them. The other key is that they should always know that the rules are not arbitrary and are set down for a reason. They may not agree with the reason, and that's OK (and expected), but they should understand that there IS a reason.

      As a parent, the trust of your children is invaluable and utterly fragile- and once you lose it, it's incredibly difficult to get back.

      Wrong again. Children naturally trust their parents. It takes a LOT of abuse to break down bonds. Take a look at any child-abuse case, and you'll find children yearning to get love and acceptance from their parents. They'll start trusting instantly.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  4. Easy to Defeat by LaNMaN2000 · · Score: 1

    If the subjects of this monitoring know that the location of the cell phone/pager is being tracked, then they will merely leave their cell-phone where they are supposed to be. Unless the parent/employer calls every so often to ensure that the subject is actually carrying the device with him, then it is all but useless, as the subject can go anywhere he pleases while the device reports that he is where he is supposed to be.

    --

    ByteMyCode.com: A Web 2.0 code sharing community.
    1. Re:Easy to Defeat by paladino · · Score: 1

      If people would read the information provided you would see that the thing LOCKS! onto your wrist and can not be unlocked by the kid. It can be unlocked by the parent remotely via the web or with the provided key fob device. Read people Read.

    2. Re:Easy to Defeat by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah and I bet it has an uncuttable wrist strap too. Seriously, this thing is junk. I mean, I have one of those Casio GPS watches, but at least I know it's a gimmick...

    3. Re:Easy to Defeat by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      Look at the statistics of car alarms and "The Club". They do not eliminate theft, they mitigate it. Professionals and people hell bent on stealing your car WILL steal your car. Joyriders will keep looking.

      The same goes for the watch. I'm sure it isn't easy to cut the band, but I gurantee it can be done. If the motive is kidnapping for profit, then they are going to grab your kid no matter what. The random sexual predator however, is going to go for an easy mark. If you don't believe that just read your local paper and see how many aborted kidnappings happen because the kid squirmed away or started screaming. Most of these perpetrators are not persistent, patient maybe, but not persistent.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    4. Re:Easy to Defeat by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      This is great. For $400 you can make it more likely that the nonce will go for your next door neighbour's kids instead of yours. Which is nice. Pretty soon everyone will have to pay this $400 "protection tax"... At which point it will be worthless because your kids are now just as likely to be targetted as your neighbours'. Oh what a wonderful world.

    5. Re:Easy to Defeat by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Do you mean American English chips or British English chips? I am guessing you mean the foil bag around "crisps" rather than newspaper... Anyway, GPS is much weaker than the mobile network, and I wouldn't be surprised if a few layers of newspaper stopped the signal. That's the main problem with this watch thingy. Most of the time it will just report "dunno where your kiddie is, can't acquire any satellites". It doesn't work indoors, it doesn't work near buildings... It's dead useful when you are walking around in the great outdoors, but in a city it is about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike.

  5. I think this was by cbensinger · · Score: 1

    posted several months back.

    I do think it's got it's potential uses; but I'm guessing it's too expensive to really get any kind of market and if that turns out to be the case how long will the service be around?

  6. I wonder... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    I wonder how many of those devices will be forgotten on city buses...

    Or better, just drop one into a Greyhound bus bound for the other coast...

  7. similar technology by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    This technology isn't really new, but it is the first time that I've heard of it being used with humans. My mom, who breeds show dogs, has told me about people that "chip" their dogs with a small GPS microchip that can be used to track the animal in case of theft or escape. Unfortunately, the chips are not very strong (due to power concerns, one wouldn't want the dog to have to carry a giant battery on its collar), so the broadcasting range is rather weak. That is to say, if you want to find the lost animal, you already need to have some general idea where it went. And while I'm not too hot on the idea of "chipping" people, it probably wouldn't help if one of your employees went AWOL or your kid decided to join the circus.

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  8. medical/emergency workers by andrewdcs · · Score: 1

    This is a good thing for emergency workers/medical staff etc. (if they'd agree to it first, not as spyware) As part of their contract (maybe with a bonus) they could agree to be on "location based call" at certain times, if an accident happens near them emergency services will know not only who is on call but who is nearest/most useful? An location based extension of a beeper. Cops could use it too, instead of calling all cars, call whos near on the Bat scan.

    1. Re:medical/emergency workers by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      I think, meaning I'm too lazy to look, that some Police departments already use GPS in their cars.

      This made me think of another use, albeit a niche use. It could seriously aid rescue workers looking for a child in a burning building.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    2. Re:medical/emergency workers by phyreguy61 · · Score: 1
      Being a firefigher Im not convinced that this would work for locating children in fires for a couple of reasons.

      First, if most people are like me they tend to put all the electronic gizmos in one place when they are home not carry them around with them. Also most of the children searched for are less than 5 or 6 years old. Not many kids that young carry pagers and cell phones.

      Second, the main condition in a structure fire is CSS (Cant See S---). A more appropriate tool for searching in the dark is a Thermal Imaging (TI) camera. The TI uses infrared to see heat sources rather than relying on visible light, which is blocked by smoke. The GPS may be useful if it is integrated into a TI but I think that would raise the already high cost of a TI ($10,000US+ for a basic model)

    3. Re:medical/emergency workers by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 2
      This is a fascinating turn to several technologies we have been looking at here. I am a firefighter, but I also work for IT for the county. One of the systems we were looking at was for location-based dispatching which would involve us putting a transmitter in a vehicle. Since all of the vehicles carry Cell Phones anyway, this may be an easier method, since we do not need pin-point accuracy.


      The other application for this technology would be the tracking of personnel on the fire ground. Currently we do that with PAR cards, which is a laminated card you give to whoever is watching an "area" before you enter it. However, in this case we DO need pinpoint accuracy. So what we have thought about is on major incidents setting up two or three mini-towers around the building and tracking off of the radio that the firefighter carry.


      All in all, I think this has some very good applications in the real world. Let's just hope the bad ones don't squash them.

  9. Chip'em!!! by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 2

    Think this is wild, what about the family down in south Florida that got CHIPED with the ADSX chips that hold your medical records. They also have batteries that suck the heat away from your body to produce energy to run. Within the they believe they will have GPS in them. All this in a chip the size of a piece of rice. They are putting them in everything from Dogs to Cattle, and people are next....Lost your kid? Here, that little rug rat is on your handy dandy webpage, via gps...

    Anyway, as much big brother as this screams I think parents are going to jump all over the Applied Digital Solutions chip. It is just a matter of time.

    --
    Neck_of_the_Woods
    #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
  10. expensive pet tracker by bensej · · Score: 1

    Since as others have pointed out a kid would just leave it at home by "accident" or leave it where they are supposed to be the only good use I can see would be as a pet tracker if you have a dog that likes to run off.

  11. Things wrong by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

    1) That's pretty expensive, considering children loose EVERYTHING. 2) I could see children being mugged because someone wants to steal these watches.

    1. Re:Things wrong by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      2) I could see children being mugged because someone wants to steal these watches

      Yeah, I can think of soooooooo many reasons why muggers would want a device that would allow parents / the police to track them!

      Furthermore, without the locator doobrie, it's going to be pretty useless isn't it?

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    2. Re:Things wrong by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      Not who, maybe where. But I suspect like most electronic devices it has a battery that can be taken out, or have the GPS disabled,so you can pawn off essentially a junk watch giving people the illusion that its tracking thier kids.

    3. Re:Things wrong by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      None, but there are plenty guys with E.E degrees looking for some cash on the side. Check out the story on cellular phone theives in europe.

  12. Does anyone remember that scene in _Casino_... by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    ...where Ace Rothstein (Robert DeNiro) gives his faithless, alcoholic wife Ginger (Sharon Stone) a beeper to keep track of her after she'd run out for the umpteenth time? Anyone who's seen the movie knows how well _that_ worked.

    hyacinthus.

  13. Wherify wireless device discussed earlier by Goonie · · Score: 2

    here. Still have grave reservations on using it on anybody competent enough to understand what it is.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  14. Super geek-on-the-playground toy by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

    "Don't punch me again Dougy, or I'll push my panic button and my dad will come get you!"

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Super geek-on-the-playground toy by Maran · · Score: 2

      Sounds like Bart's second-hand "Ultimate" belt.

      "Help! Help! Help! Help!"

      "Can't you read?! Call the police!" Thwack.

      Maran

    2. Re:Super geek-on-the-playground toy by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 1

      That's the best argument against this device anyone has mustered.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
  15. More developer opportunities by SL33Z3 · · Score: 1

    The next question is this. You can track where your kids are. But I wonder how long it will be before someone comes up with an alert system that tells you if kids go someplace you don't allow them to. Can you imagine going to a website and setting location boundaries, then getting a cell-phone alert if your kids cross those boundaries?

    --
    SL33ZE - Artificial Intelligence is No Match For Natural Stupidity -
    1. Re:More developer opportunities by f00zbll · · Score: 1
      This has already been done by several companies as research projects. For example GPS messaging. I worked on something similar, though we weren't targetting kids/parents. Our idea was cheating husbands and wives.

      No amount of technology is going to make a bad parent become a good one. Teenagers are smart and will find ways to get around it. Really, if some kid wants to go outside the boundaries, they could easily pay a classmate to sit at a cafe for 4 hours while they go party. Given that phones can forward the calls to another phone, what's to stop a group of kids getting a phone to share? Think about it. Say you have a group of teens whose parents are very strict. A group of them pool their money together to buy a phone. They all meet at a burger joint, friends house, cafe or where ever. They have all their phones set to forward the calls. If the parents call, they cover for each other. One person watches the phones in one location and it looks like the kids are where they're supposed to be.

      Of course, one could use more high tech methods to get around it, but why bother when lo-tech method works just fine.

    2. Re:More developer opportunities by SL33Z3 · · Score: 1

      This wasn't intended to be "the answer" to everyone's problems. It is just another help. Placing cameras in banks doesn't stop banks from being robbed either, but guess what, it sure helps when one does get robbed right? This is the same thing. Kids will find ways around things -- always. But it's just another deterant. When I was a kid, I had ways around things and my parents had their ways of finding out if I circumvented their rules. In today's high-tech world, kids have more advanced ways to circumvent things (as you pointed out with call forwarding etc). Why not even the playing field with more advanced means of monitoring.

      Before it goes unsaid (by me anyway), this seems unnecessary if you are raising your children right. However, an occasional check-up on junior isn't out of the ordinary.

      --
      SL33ZE - Artificial Intelligence is No Match For Natural Stupidity -
  16. Repeat by mattyohe · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/28/0432228.shtm l

    The disussion was mostly /.'ers sharing anticdotes about getting lost as a child, and how this tool is a "Godsend". Others stated that parents want their kid to "handle themselves outdoors".

    but at the end of the day... repeat

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  17. The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by paladino · · Score: 5, Informative

    If people would read the information provided you would see that the thing LOCKS! onto your wrist and can not be unlocked by the kid. There would be no "leaving it at home" or "putting it were you are suposed to be". It can be unlocked by the parent remotely via the web or with the provided key fob device. Read people Read.

    1. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by oyenstikker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, you see, I was watching Johnny's dad fix his car, and he dropped the propane torch, and it went right by my arm. Luckily, the gizmo was there to protect my arm, but it got wrecked. Then, wouldn't you believe it? I tripped over a lug nut, and fell, and the gizmo, being weakened from the heat, got bent. So then we were playing baseball, see, and I got hit by a pitch, which broke it the rest of the way off!

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    2. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by fermion · · Score: 1
      Ok ,seriously, so what. I think devices such as this need to be looked at beyond the fear marketing.

      First, let's look at the lock. From the FAQ
      ...lock the Locator on the wearer's wrist to ensure that it won't get lost. Simply press the middle button on the Locator. The subscriber can also request that the device be unlocked remotely, either on the Internet or over any phone. If unlocked, the unit will automatically lock during an emergency (either wearer or subscriber initiated).
      This implies that not only can the child unlock it, but also anyone with the code can unlock it. Once unlocked, the unit can be removed and lost. Kids fidgit. Kids remove clothes and jewelry from thier body, even without thinking about it. Kids take off cool stuff to show to thier mates. The device will be misplaced.

      Next, from the article (ad copy?), here is the intended application
      "Let's say you have a seven-year-old who walks to school alone and they felt in danger. They could push one button on the watch and lock the device," said Wherify President Timothy Neher.
      So this device is to let your 7 year old kid walk alone? I don't know about the rest of you, but I was not allowed more than a couple yards from my house until I was way more than 7. You see, I had a family who cared about me and was willing to be personally inconvenienced to protect me.

      If this is to be used to prevent abductions, it may work by making the intended abductee less attractive. However, there are often not too many kids who go unsupervised, or who accidentally wander off, so I suspect the principle of the easier target may not apply. Once abducted, it is a simple matter of removing the watch and throwing it out the window. And not to get too gruesome, but if the abductor is just going to molest and kill the kid anyway, I do not see a limit to what might be done to get the watch off.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by Hanul · · Score: 1

      Well, I can tell you, we used to play in the the woods or at the river from age 6, being miles away from home until sunset. That was fun, and our parents knew we would come back in time for dinner. Parents should trust their children.

    4. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the rest of you, but I was not allowed more than a couple yards from my house until I was way more than 7.

      I don't know where you lived, but screw that philosophy. I am NOT going to build a prison around my house and keep my kids "safe" from the 1 in a million chance they might be upducted.

      Yes, there IS such a thing as too safe. The day my kids can't roam around our neighborhood exploring is the day I find a new neighborhood.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by jeffy210 · · Score: 1

      that the thing LOCKS! onto your wrist and can not be unlocked by the kid...

      Not trying to troll here, but what about the deranged kidnapper who does not want to be tracked and chops the kids hand off to get rid of it??

      --
      ------
      "And may your days be long upon the earth."
    6. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by tongue · · Score: 2

      Its not a matter of the neighborhood you live in. Children are abducted every day from neighborhoods ranging from crackhouses to multimillion dollar homes. The serial killer baton rouge is currently dealing with struck twice in the same rich neighborhood. despite widespread belief to the contrary, many types of crime are not a function of where you live. so unless you're willing to move to an island in the south pacific where you are the only inhabitants, you're absurdly naive to reject the possibility of your child being abducted from your neighborhood.

    7. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      you're absurdly naive to reject the possibility of your child being abducted from your neighborhood.

      No, you're absurdly paranoid. Way more kids are killed by lightning than are abducted by strangers. Should I never let my child play outside because some stray lightning bolt might get them? Way more kids are killed in car accidents -- should I never drive my kids anywhere? And I'm sure I could go on and on.

      The odds of my kids getting abducted are literally millions to one. You'll pardon me if I live my life in a rational way and worry more about my developing my children's independence and trust than filling their mind with worthless thoughts that the entire world is crawling with people just waiting to grab them.

      Sheesh, it's no wonder that kids are fat and lazy. Parents keep them chained up around the house all the time, if you're any typical example.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by pogen · · Score: 2
      You'll pardon me if I live my life in a rational way and worry more about my developing my children's independence and trust than filling their mind with worthless thoughts that the entire world is crawling with people just waiting to grab them.

      Hear, hear. I don't think that many of these paranoid parents have any idea of how low the real statistical risk is.

      On the other hand, as the proportion of paranoid parents increases, the risk to children of the remaining laissez-faire parents probably increases -- when the kidnappers come around, they're the only ones left to choose from. In that sense, it is legitimately more dangerous to let your kids run free today than it used to be, but only because there are so few running free. This probably leads to a snowball effect similar to the one that's filling our highways with SUVs (it is truly more dangerous to drive a smaller car today, but only because there are too many of these ridiculous behemoths out there endangering you -- so you feel pressured to join them for your own safety).

    9. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      dady, dady! I went outside and suddenly my watch said .

      darn, must have forget to turn of the self-destruct function...

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
    10. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      "the thing LOCKS! onto your wrist"

      Didn't the BladeRunner prison have a similar device?

    11. Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      That "missingkids.com" site seems to be down. Be that as it may, I'm sorry, but I simply don't believe those statistics. It sounds like one of those stats like "50% of women are raped at one time in their life". What they don't tell you about those type of stats is that "rape" is defined as asking a woman, "have you ever had sex when you didn't really want to". Show me some real FBI statistics, with full definitions and breakdowns, and I might believe it. Advocacy sites almost always grossly exaggerate.

      In any case, you're focusing on the lightning tree and ignoring the forest of the odds. Fine, I'll drop the lightning example, but it's still way more dangerous to drive a car. When you also combine with the fact that I live in a very quiet, secluded place, the odds of my children getting kidnapped are vanishingly small.

      Frankly, if you are worried about kidnapping, yet drive your kids around in a car, you are a bald-faced hypocrite.

      I repeat, it is NOT in my children's best interest to lock them in the house and fill their heads with paranoia and fear. I want my children to embrace and explore the world. That's not to say that I don't teach them common sense about these things, but it definitely doesn't mean that they will be leashed to my house.

      I hope for your children's sake the inheirited the brains from the other side of the family. RealityMaster, my ass....

      Rather than insulting me and offering a pointless refutation of an example that changes nothing about the overall point, why don't you go learn something about statistics.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  18. Ideal time to market this! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Since there seem to be two teenage girls missing in the UK, it really is an ideal time to market tracking devices for you children. Never forget: "Think of the children".

  19. Great concept but... by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had this same idea a while back... but then found the real problem:

    GPS signals are way too weak to be of any use in real-life situations. Go inside a building and the signal dies. Go under some trees and it's one. Heck even state of the art GPS receivers require a 30-second interval to get its initial coordinates.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:Great concept but... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Yes, and futhermore the batteries are not going to last long. My wristwatch GPS is supposed to do about 70 readings or something. Then I have to recharge it. You certainly don't leave it getting constant readings... Bye bye battery! Add the fact that this thing has to act as a pager too...

    2. Re:Great concept but... by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      simple! let them carry 2 suitcases & 1 backpack full of batteries with them... and too increase power also put solar panels on their back...

      problem solved...

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
  20. Window of opportunity by theRhinoceros · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The window of usefulness for a device like this, IMO, is bounded by two things:

    -the lower boundary being the age where a child can reliably keep this thing on all day without messing with it, taking it off, or letting somebody "borrow" it

    -the upper boundary being the age where the child is savvy enough to put a bit of distance between him/herself and the device.

    If your child is young and loose enough to warrant a $400 tracking device, perhaps your parenting techniques need to be reconsidered. If your child is older and warrants a tracking device, he/she will soon figure out a way to defeat it, whether by losing it, throwing it away, etc. Older children who do not want to be tracked will find a way not to be tracked. The window of age where this device will be an effective tracking solution is pretty narrow, as I see it.

    1. Re:Window of opportunity by sheriff_p · · Score: 2

      It's great to see you took the time to read the product description!

      Now, while I'm not saying it's not possible to take the device off, if you put a lot of time and energy into it, the device is specifically made to be difficult to take off or cut off. Attempts to do so will trigger the alarm feature.

      - Young kids will have trouble letting someone borrow it without parental permission or loosing a hand

      - Older kids who try and remove it will find it triggers an alarm to let their parents know. Nice try.

      Your last paragraph seems to be a little strange ... are you saying that parents should watch their children 24 hours a day? Seems a little unfeasible, I think, but maybe you've figured out a way not to sleep.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    2. Re:Window of opportunity by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Watching your children 24/7 is not neccessary if you raise the correctly for the first 5-6 years. Make sure they aren't fscking stupid enough to take rides from strangers etc... And not stupid enough to play chicken with trains, or lay in the street and wait for someone to run them over. Make sure your kid isn't stupid and you don't really need one of these.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    3. Re:Window of opportunity by sheriff_p · · Score: 2

      Raising your kids to not to be stupid helps how exactly when your kid is abducted by someone a lot bigger and stronger than them, perhaps with a weapon?

      Are you saying kids have to be doing something stupid to be abducted? I'm sure there are numerous victims of abuse who'd find your suggestion that they only got abused/abducted/whatever because they were raised to be stupid as highly ignorant, misinformed and offensive.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    4. Re:Window of opportunity by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      You said:Your last paragraph seems to be a little strange ... are you saying that parents should watch their children 24 hours a day? Seems a little unfeasible, I think, but maybe you've figured out a way not to sleep.

      Well, not maybe watch the children 24 hours a day, but at least be aware of when you should watch them and where they are. When me and my brother went out to play, my mom said you stay in this area....meaning we stayed with in the block. We were not allowed to walk to the store by ourselves or anything until we were much older. We were raised to respect our parents, so we knew we had better listen or we'd get the proverbial beat down (spanking, priviledges taken away or something to that effect). Now alot of folks want to be buddies with their kids. I will be their buddy sometimes, but, I hate to break it to ya, sometimes I gotta lay down the law. No you must not watch your kids 24 hours a day, but you should at least know where they are at and hope they actually go where they are going. A prime example of being aware of your kids.....that lady in Texas thought the baby would be fine if she just ran the cart back to the corral. We all know what happened. Personally, when in that situation, I will take my son with me to the corral unless I am parked next to it. Only then would I actually leave my son alone in the car and I would possibly lock the door for the minute I would be away. I feel sorry for that lady that she had to go through that and I am not validating what the snatcher did in any way, but that lady could have been more careful when doing what she did. Personally, if I had to take 3 kids to the store, I would not go or if I had to, I would have tried to take another adult or possibly parked next to the corral even if I had to park in the boonies. No blame being placed on that lady and she doesn't deserve to have the wrath of children services come down on her, but she should be more careful (and probably will) in the future.

      --

      Gorkman

    5. Re:Window of opportunity by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      This device is designed to do the following: Sound an alarm when a child is in an emergency.
      The following situations would in no way be alleviated by this device:

      Child is grabbed off of street by random person, random person cuts off bracelet thing with bolt cutters and tosses it out the window. Now, you have the last known position of the kid, which you would have anyways unless the kid is wandering around on deserted streets alone, which he shouldn't be, Stupid Kid.

      Child is raped/molested by random stranger. Bracelet sounds alert for the entire 15 minutes it takes for kid to be traumatized for life. Not the kids fault, but the bracelet didn't help.

      Kid gets hit by a car, falls out a window, lights himself on fire. Bracelet doesn't help at all.

      Sooo... What is this bracelet designed to do exactly? Let paranoid parents track their kid... Umm, apparently they don't trust their kid, because this thing certainly doesn't stop anything from happening TO the kid.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  21. Not too new in the US, either. by budalite · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is at least one company, SAIC, that has been installing a similar mobile product in American utility trucks for a few years. It tracks the trucks 24/7. Utility Repair/Installation Efficiency has risen dramatically in response. The Union agreed to the idea only, if I remember rightly, after the Utility agreed to include (and require) an emergency call button on a seperate keychain for the Techs.
    (Disclaimer: Used to work for SAIC.)

  22. Two things about "child abductions" by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off, despite the recent spait of publicity about child abductions, well over 90% of them are by family members. So, they either probably have the code to turn this thing off or it isn't on the kid when they're taken.

    Second, GPS signals and wireless signals are quite easy to block. GPS doesn't work indoors and the most common place to lose a child is a large department store or mall. So, it doesn't do you any good there.

    Finally, battery life. How long will this thing run before recharges? If it doesn't last long then you can just wrap some tinfoil around the thing to block the GPS signal and wait for the battery to die.

    Though, you have to admire how quicly companies can market to the latest paranoia.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by sheriff_p · · Score: 2

      90% of them are by family memebers

      I don't know where you got this statistic, but, let's assume it's true. Your argument is a little like saying:

      "90% of car crashes are non-fatal, thus airbags are pointless"

      Yes, it's conceivably possible to block off the GPS signal and wait for the battery to die. Assuming your child's abductor knows the child wears it, knows what it is, and knows how the GPS signal can be blocked. Even with these assumptions, it's still then possible to get the last location of the child before the signal went black, and thus probably where they were abducted. Perhaps you think this is useless information?

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    2. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by saskboy · · Score: 1

      The point about the batteries and signal is well taken. After all, has anyone used a little GPS device in a building after all?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 2


      They already have a battery that gets it's energy from body heat, this is not going to be a problem in the very very near future.

      --
      Neck_of_the_Woods
      #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
    4. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2

      I think you miss the point.

      The issue, to use your car analogy, isn't that airbags or this particular device are pointless, it's that they don't provide the protection that you think they do. (Though arguably air bags are quite effective.)

      As far as I know, this system would not be sending in its location all the time. Maybe it would send updates every minute at the fastest. The issue is the effectiveness of the data that it gathers and transmits. Additionally, the issue is about how parents would treat this tool. This is not a substitute for watching your kid and escorting them from place to place.

      (As for the 90% I think the number is actually MUCH higher: from http://www.lostchildren.org/STATISTICS.htm we have over 350,000 family abductions in the US yearly. How many stranger abduction cases have we heard about lately? 3? 5?)

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    5. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2

      But what risk are you managing with a device like this?

      First off, you've got a watch that SCREAMS out its identity (look at the pictures of it on the site). Second, it requires two different technologies (GPS and Digital Cellular) to work. Finally, it requires that you have it on the kid all the time. Is it water proof? (They talk about being able to remotely unlock the watch so they can participate in a pool party) How shock proof is this thing? How heavy is it?

      Risk management is also about avoiding a false sense of security (like people who eschew escorts because they have pepper spray). Personally, I think this device has far too many shortcomings to it. (And yes, I'm a recent father so this will become more and more of a concern for me.)

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    6. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I have used one in a building... It does not work very well at all.

      --
      ~ kjrose
    7. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 1

      [i]"If it doesn't last long then you can just wrap some tinfoil around the thing to block the GPS signal"[/i]

      Dude, you are so going to get sued under the DMCA!

    8. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by isorox · · Score: 2

      GPS doesn't work indoors and the most common place to lose a child is a large department store or mall. So, it doesn't do you any good there.

      However you know they are confined to the mall (which empties and closes at night), otherwise you get a signal.

      Finally, battery life. How long will this thing run before recharges? If it doesn't last long then you can just wrap some tinfoil around the thing to block the GPS signal and wait for the battery to die.

      Howabout the same technology that works your watch from arm movement/heat/electricity or however.

    9. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2

      Your "mathematics" are really bankrupt from the beginning.

      You assigned the watch a 0.01% probabilty of working. I'd contest that number and probably put it at 0.00001% or lower. Why? The technology required for it to work is just too fragile for the application.

      First off, it's simplicity itself to block the signals needed for the watch to function. Second, because of it's high visibility it's also quite easy to merely cut it off the child's wrist (I can see it now, cut it off, toss it in the back of a truck and let the would be rescuers go off on a merry chase while you casually walk off in the other direction.) Finally, the parents who will use this device will use it as a substitute for good parenting. Thus you've INCREASED the risks to the child without a matching decrease from the device.

      Finally, as we've explored the true abduction danger is from other family members. So, as I've said we're selling to paranoia here. (Look at the number of stranger kidnappings we hear about in the news and we realize that more good can be done by buying bicycle helmets for all kids then this device will accomplish.)

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    10. Re:Two things about "child abductions" by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

      Heh, well I'll take Reynold's Wrap down with me!

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  23. or perhaps even... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

    Tracking your employee's children. :-)

    I've already got something that can track my kids (if I had any) it's called a large network of friends in my city.

    --
    ~ kjrose
    1. Re:or perhaps even... by vr · · Score: 2

      sounds kewl. is there an RFC for this network? what's the protocol called? does it run over TCP/IP?

  24. Not so by jockm · · Score: 2

    The chips placed in pets do not have GPS. They are passive transmitters that use the energy from the reader to broadcast back a simple ID. The range of the largest reader we have at the shelter I volunteer at is less than a foot.

    That being caid chipping your pets is a "Good Thing" and is one of the most effective things you can do to help ensure you will recover your pet if it gets lost.

    --

    What do you know I wrote a novel
  25. employees and/or children by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

    ...in several asian countries your employees and children could be the same people! *ba dum bum*

  26. Tracking Your Employees, Children by kubrick · · Score: 1

    There are children out there with employees? And here I am, self-employed and contracting at 28, no-one working under me. Some days I just feel old...

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  27. Friendfinder by zyklone · · Score: 2

    The main ISP/Phone Company here in Sweden, Telia, have had that service for a while now.

    Basically you can enable a service which lets your friends locate your phone. The triangulation part is not working yet I think. But the location of the closest GSM station is usually enough to find someone.

    It's SMS/WAP based and can be enabled and disabled easily. It could ofcourse be used by corporations also, they would just have to require the employees to have the service on at all times.

  28. implants, dammit! by fermion · · Score: 1
    This is kind of like those collars you put on dogs and cats to keep them from leaving the yard. It may be a technically good idea, but it is a matter of minutes before the animal will have the collar off and eat it. The same thing should be expected with kids. I am pretty sure the expectation value of the time between the kid leaving the house and the device leaving the kid would be measured in nanoseconds. Likewise, reasonably intelligent employees will just leave the tracking phone in the office while he or she goes out for the afternoon affair. Although there are some security reasons for both technologies, I think either group, in most cases, would resist.

    Never fear, though, a solution exists and it come from the vet. We must all be implanted with microtransmitters. The sales of receivers will strictly limited to parents and employers. The receivers will be set so they can only track the intended parties, and the settings will be protected with the latest quantum crypto chaos based advanced pseudo mathematical encryption that will keep all hackers at bay. The DCMA will be used to prosecute receiver hackers and surgeons that remove the transmitter.

    Oh, how safe the world will be.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  29. Nice idea... by Bowdie · · Score: 1

    Get children used to wearing trakcing devices early. That way, it'll just be the norm when they're grown up.

    Tin hats on people.

    --
    yes, www.dotcomforwardslash.com is my real URL.
  30. Oh wonderful world by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

    Well this device may look pretty cool. But every technology has its double uses...

    First we get it to the kids so they don't get lost or abducted... Pretty and nice toy that kids love to carry.
    Then we keep track of teenagers and where they get lost by night and if they go to school... We stick a superminiature device to their shoes...
    Later your boss keeps track of your wanderings and why you get late to work... All under a new fresh product "Window to worker(TM)" sold by another politically correct privacy corp...

    1. Re:Oh wonderful world by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      "First we get it to the kids so they don't get lost or abducted... Pretty and nice toy that kids love to carry.
      Then we keep track of teenagers and where they get lost by night and if they go to school... We stick a superminiature device to their shoes...
      Later your boss keeps track of your wanderings and why you get late to work... All under a new fresh product "Window to worker(TM)" sold by another politically correct privacy corp..."

      By desnsitizing us to the idea of being monitored, we will eventually lose any notion of privacy.

      Indeed, it's astounding how far this has gone already. As a Network Administrator, I'm not part of the "great unwashed", and thus, don't have my e-mail monitored, web browsing habits recorded, etc, because I AM THE ONE WHO HAS TO DO IT...

      These things go too far though. Any kid too young to go out unsupervised is STILL too young to do so even with this thing strapped on.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
  31. That's right folks! by medraut · · Score: 1

    Gone are the days of needless parenting, where watching your child's every move consumed most of your day. For a limited introductory price of $399.99 we will introduce you to a world of reasonability-free parenting, where a touch of the button will allow little Johnny's whereabouts to be transmitted to every paedophile in the area.

    Does anyone know what kind of security is in place to prevent tapping of such information? The last thing I would want is some freak 'sniffing' the location of my children. It makes me think of a predator following the scent of it's prey.

    Medraut

  32. Misread title by voicebox · · Score: 1

    I read the title as "Children, Track Your Employees" and I wondered why children would employ anyone...

  33. First? by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Japan's had phones with similar functionality for at least three years... there's a version for children that allows the parents to find out where the phone is via fax.

  34. Re:You guys are missing the point... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    These abductions are high-profile only because they are on TV. No more or less lately than there have been for ages.

    Kids need freedom. Within limits, but freedom to explore.

    As far as employees, if one chooses to go AWOL, so be it. He'll come back to an empty desk. If I can't trust him to be where he is supposed to be, I can't trust him with the companies money or clients.

  35. Chldren != people by LAI · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is great. Put your kid on a leash, monitor him electronically, follow his every movement. Why be half-assed about it? Just tag your child like livestock so they can't just "forget" their tracking device somewhere. Are children really denied any human rights that interfere with their parents' plans?

    A kid can't pursue happiness if their particular brand of happiness conflicts with their parents' wishes. Think of the standard example of a kid who is gay, and whose parents are religious or otherwise intolerant. Generally what happens is the kid either represses his normal, healthy urges and becomes miserable or rebels against his parents, often being punished for it, often hating his folks for the rest of his life.

    A kid can't pursue liberty if his parents don't want him to. A kid (with this or any other tracking device) doesn't have the privacy that we all strive for all the time. The implication is that a child's life is not his own. He is free to live his life until his parents decide he's stepping on their toes or they decide they don't agree with the way he feels about stuff.

    Kids' right to life is a whole big bucket o' worms, so I won't go into that -- but you get the idea.

    There seems to be a pervasive attitude (not just in North America) that until we reach the age of majority we are not fully human. Speaking in American terms, two of the so-called "self-evident" and "unalienable" rights are waived or subjected to editing according to what the child's parents think.

    --
    :eof
    1. Re:Chldren != people by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      Ah, yes, the 'unalienable rights.' Each year someone quotes that magnificent poetry. Life? What 'right' to life has a man who is drowning in the Pacific? The ocean will not hearken to his cries. What 'right' to life has a man who must die if he is to save his children? If he chooses to save his own life, does he do so as a matter of 'right'? If two men are starving and cannibalism is the only alternative to death, which man's right is 'unalienable'? And is it 'right'? As to liberty, the heroes who signed that great document pledged themselves to buy liberty with their lives. Liberty is always unalienable; it must be redeemed regularly with the blood of patriots or it is always vanquished. Of all the so-called 'natural human rights' that have ever been invented, liberty is least likely to be cheap and is never free of cost.

  36. Err, yes but.. by tonywestonuk · · Score: 2

    Did you never 'get lost' when you were a kid?.... Was it your parents fault, or yours for 'wandering off?' - The fact is that parents can't constantly keep an eye on there kids - there attention needs only to be distracted for a brief moment for kids to disappear, and this gizmo is for when, the kids find themselves lost.

    1. Re:Err, yes but.. by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      So when you got lost as a kid, what happened? Did you wander for months, and end up being raised by wild animals in the jungle?
      I think not... Yes, even before the days of such technological gimmicks, people did actually manage to exist...

    2. Re:Err, yes but.. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      So when you got lost as a kid, what happened? Did you wander for months, and end up
      being raised by wild animals in the jungle?


      Yes, but I still turned out ok. WHERE'S MY RAW MEAT!!
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  37. Security/privacy concerns... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 2
    Service provider - The Pinpoint Company - insists there'll be no breach of privacy if it is used properly.

    Duh! I hate to be the one suggesting it but what if - and believe me this is entirely hypocri^H^H^Hthetical - someone isn't using it "properly" ?

    Serisouly, the concern would ofcourse be that it might allow tracking of people who are now aware of it. Although it doesn't mention much of the technical side in the article, I doubt that the technology requires more than software in the phone system. This means that in the wrong hands, any phone could be tracked.

    Still, it'd be cool to install it in your car so you could track that when it's stolen.
    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  38. Long overdue by maunleon · · Score: 1

    Maybe it will keep the cops from parking their butts for hours at the donut shop next to my freeway exit!

    Come to think of it, Krispy Kreme could start their own network aimed at law enforcement. All you'd have to do is call them and ask for "Officer Jones" and in 30 seconds or less he'll be located at one of their branches. If he's not there, he can still get the message when he walks in within 15 minutes. Ah.. who needs this HK high tech thing.

  39. Re:You guys are missing the point... by Captain+Zion · · Score: 1

    Of course, the only real solution for this case is to build a city wall. (Someone call the City Wok guy please.)

  40. Re: their irresponsibility by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
    It maybe "en vogue" to blast parents for their irresponsibility, but there are some things that all parents are defensless against.

    OK,

    So you are a good parrent. Please allow me to take a momment (before I go on a rant) to genuinely applaude you. If more people were like you, the world would be a better place.

    However, the number of people who have invested the level of thought that you have, is uncomfortably low. There ARE bad parrents out there. They have problems that ARE their own fault that they then expect society to fix while they whine about how unfortunate they are.

    It is no wonder that the children of these people have little feeling of accountability as they have never seen what that looks like. Take for example the kids that shot up thier high school and killed themselves. If their parrents had done that personally they would be on 'death row' right now, and I am not so sure that they shouldn't be there now.

    And while there are situations where bad things happen to good people, more often than not, the story ends up being that half of what would be considered 'due dilligence' would have protected these poor children.

    Allow me to sum-up the point I am trying to make. Bad things happening to children is not always due to the neglegence of the parrents. BUT when it IS, they should be recognised as the criminals that they are and removed from society just like all of the other scum.

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
  41. As a parent... by conan_albrecht · · Score: 2

    As a parent of small girls, I welcome this technology. We watch our kids like hawks. They are never more than 5 feet from us. So why would I welcome something like this? Because it's one more level of security.

    3 years ago we were at sea world and I was watching my 3 year old on their giant playground. She went behind a slide and disappeared. I immediately ran over to find her, and she was gone. My heart sank. 30 minutes later my wife and I found her 1/4 mile from where we had lost her.

    So say all you want about "well, the parent should be watching the child." Blah. Things happen. Kids run. I'd love to have something to help me find them.

    That said, an even better technology would be one that would use short-distance (0-5 miles) wireless and simply point in the direction of my child's signal. That would be even more helpful when they wander unexpectedly at sea world or wal-mart or...

    Get off your high horses. After all we can do, parents still need help sometimes.

    1. Re:As a parent... by RedForce · · Score: 1

      Well, that brings up a question: how long would a child be required to use such a device? A 3 year old won't care that there's some braclet on him/her. But what about this child at the the age of 16? This device should NOT be used to replace trust, and responsibility on both the side of the kid AND the parent. A parent has to learn to trust their child, and the child has to learn to be responsible. To keep an eye on a child that isn't old enough to talk, well, that's one thing. To replace placing trust and responsibility in a mid-teenager, is quite another.

    2. Re:As a parent... by e2d2 · · Score: 2

      I agree that this should not be a substitute for trust. On the other hand I have never felt such an awful feeling as losing track of where your child is. They are so curious and care free that they wander/run off, especially when they are young.

      To try and use one of these with my daughter when she turns 16 is a joke. She's only 9 now and thinks she knows everything and doesn't need any help. I couldn't imagine trying something like that with a teenager.

    3. Re:As a parent... by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. What is needed isn't a device for tracking teenagers (which, as noted elsewhere, wouldn't work anyway) but for finding lost kids in the mall or at the park.

      I love the idea of a simple short-range wireless device (doesn't have to be GPS, could work indoors, etc).

      This would make it similar to the "leash" you sometimes see parents have on young kids, except it isn't demeaning to the child.

  42. like that AT&T labs thing by AssFace · · Score: 2

    I can recall when VNC was still on the AT&T labs site and they had this other thing that I thought was really cool and also really disturbing.

    You would wear a tag on your shirt, presumably part of an id badge system already in place (or not). In that badge was... something magic - I'd assume a chip of somesort and maybe a transmitter.
    Then using the gridwork of a hanging ceiling, you would setup monitors at central places in each room (or several over large spaces).
    Then this would talk to your servers... or maybe the servers would talk to it... whatever.

    The end result was you could finger someone and it would say where in the building they were - even with the ability for a graphical system as well (technically could even tie into a camera system, but that wasn't something they showed).
    So you could be sitting in a meeting, waiting for Larry (Larry is always late, that bastard), and then on your laptop there finger Larry and see that he is in the kitchen and has been there for 3 hours... perhaps Larry had a heart attack and is lying there dead (or just took off his id badge there and ran away, frolicking merrily in fields of poppies... you know, those fields that are near all offices).
    You could also finger rooms and see all the people in that room - so you could finger the bathroom and see who is in there, or who is gathering around the water cooler.

    That alone made me want to start a company. Just to dick around with that.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  43. What about (ex)wives? by redfenix · · Score: 1

    Sure wish I could have thrown one of these things into the (ex) wife's car when she was cheating on me.

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    1. Re:What about (ex)wives? by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

      You can do this with any normal GPS that saves its path - you just can't get at the data until they get home and you can retrieve the gps. Anyway I'm surprised they don't use this as a marketing angle.

    2. Re:What about (ex)wives? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      So you could do what exactly? Violently confront them and end up with a possibly fatal or harmful result?

      Or to voyeristically get your jollies?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:What about (ex)wives? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Or collect evidence to support adultery as a reason for divorce. That's probably your best bet. Also a good reason why the divorce isn't your fault.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  44. the new threat by Rumagent · · Score: 1

    Forget terrorism and bio weapons. This is the new threat. We are breeding our own demise. In a generation or two, the entire northern hemisphere will be reduced to a bunch of pussies wearing nothing but sensible shoes with matchings outfits.

    With any luck I will be dead by then. /Rumagent

  45. I was never lost. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    I always wound up in the book section, or the toy section. I knew right where i was and where I was going. ;)

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:I was never lost. by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Same here! I wasn't lost, my parents were. They were the ones who didn't know where they were going. I was headed straight for Gi. Joe and the latest Hardy Boys book (circa 8 years old...).
      And if some guy had grabbed me, I'd have had the common sense to scream my lungs out, bite the guy, etc.. etc... which may not have helped a whole lot to stop him but certainly would have had everyone looking at me.
      Nowadays of course a child screaming at the top of their lungs in the store is no big deal, everyone just tries to ignore it...

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  46. Question... by mhore · · Score: 1
    Is the GPS signal so weak that it could be blocked with tinfoil?

    Mike.

    --

    Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    1. Re:Question... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Here have some information that will answer that question....

      the faraday effect

      and the faraday cage

      I can block a 20 Bajillion watt transmitter with tinfoil.. I am sure that the signals from 6-12 sattelites overhead can easily be blocked by it.

      so your answer is yes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Question... by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 1

      I can block a 20 Bajillion watt transmitter with tinfoil.. I am sure that the signals from 6-12 sattelites overhead can easily be blocked by it.

      Just wrapped my Nokia 3310 in tinfoil, still full signal.

      Next I'm gonna put some cheese on it and put it in the oven , 225C , 15 minutes.

    3. Re:Question... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      fully wrapped? if so, then how did you see full signal?

      you HAVE to fully wrap it. and before you ask "How do I know it's blocking it if I cant see the display?" call it, if it rings then it's getting through...

      Be sure to overlap the edges and make it "sealed".. the best way it to wrap around twice.. an opening that is 3.5 millimeters wide WILL let a cellular signal in.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  47. Other Uses? by snawdjj2 · · Score: 1
    I would think a device like this could be used for anything you want track via GPS. I would use it in a car, kidda like a poor man's LoJack. The only bad thing I could see about it is that there is a monthly fee. I don't know if the fee is less than LoJack's system.

    But it would be neat to have an automated program to track your movements in your can and have them display on say a secured webpage. I could think of uses for this while traveling/exploring. I know that the same thing could be accomplished with a handheld/car mounted GPS, but the size of the unit and the possible LoJack emulation might make it worth it.

  48. Employer tracking me? by liquidsin · · Score: 2

    Sure, they *claim* it won't be used for anything other than finding which employees are closest to the customers so they can reduce travel times, etc. but think of the possible abuse of this. Mind you, you could always forward calls from your work cell to your personal cell, leave the work cell at home, and then even if they do call you, you're covered.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  49. 1984 gets closer and closer by RailGunner · · Score: 2
    You know, between these "Hellion Electric Eyes" (Judas Priest reference for the non-headbangers out there) watching us, and the way the media portrays the mythical "Religious Right" organization as a villian of Emmanuel Goldstein proportions, we're getting closer and closer to 1984.

    I've said this before, and I'll say it again: The sole responsibility for monitoring your child's safety is yours. Technology like this is merely a false sense of security. In the case of companies using it on employees, it's a disgusting invasion of privacy, and I'm surprised that it's legal here in the states. (Of course, I'm also upset that companies, under threat of terminating your employment, can extract bodily fluids from you in the name of a "drug test".)

    Even more of a kick in the teeth is the cost.. $400 bucks to lose all privacy of where I'm at at any given time? No thanks. If I run an errand during my lunch hour, it's nobody's business but my own.

  50. Growing up == being independent by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 2

    Somewhat ironic, conisdering that part of growing up is learning to be indipendent from your parents.

    Remember when you first got lost as a kid?
    Tears... upset.... A learning experiance wasn't it! Maybe someone had to call a policeman for you? All turned out right in the end didn't it. (Kiddy fiddlers are few and far between)
    Maybe parents dont want there kid go grow up or something....

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  51. Vailable in europe for a long time now... by Cpt_Corelli · · Score: 1

    This has been available in europe for quite some time now. In sweden the service is cheap (ca 15 cents per search), and you can access it through a web or wap interface. Using the web interface you will get a nice zoomable map that displays the location of your friends (they have to opt-in).

    Last time I tried though the map indicted that one of my friends was in the middle of a lake when he in fact was miles away from the indicated position. I guess it will take some tuning to get it right.

    Telia Mobile Friendfinder

  52. Employee rights? by mcdade · · Score: 2

    I don't know about you but tracking an employee during the day seems to infringe on rights. I would never work on an employeer who implemented such a system, then again most people are a slave to the system and will happily do such things.

    This seems to create a big brother culture, track all your employees, log their phone calls, watch there network usage.. it's 1984.. just a little later. This seems to create a hostil work enviroment rather then one geared towards a happy workplace. You don't want your employees feeling like prisioners while at the jobsite.

    Than again.. if it's based on a cell signal, we all know how well they work.. just turn off the phone!.

  53. Some sort of...non...giving up...school guy by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    For those of us who don't have cellphones/pagers/other wireless gadgets does that mean "the hunt begins"?

    Seriously though, what would happen if carrying an electronic device that tracked your position became mandatory by law? Kind of creeps me out.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  54. These aren't entirely bad things... by grayhaired · · Score: 1

    Because if you can locate someone by virtue of their cell phone, (or at least locate their cell phone), then some missing persons cases could be solved with this kind of technology.

    If, instead, you're an adult with tastes you don't want the world to know (adult clubs, fringe politics, /. maybe (seriously, its been banned at my workplaces before)), you might find it an opportune time to start paying for your own cell instead of using one supplied by an employer.

  55. Cheaper and easier solution by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    The simplest solution is to just chop off your kid's feet and stick them in front of the TV until they are ready for college. No more parental worries!

    Seriously though, people have got to stop getting their worldview from the media. 500 kids a year disappearing (the vast majority at the hands of divorced parents) out of the millions of kids is pretty small when you look at the number who die from such unglamorous fates such as car accidents or fires. People need to maintain perspective.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  56. field test by zenray · · Score: 1

    I consider these to be just field tests to get all the bugs worked out. When Aschroft,et al are satified it 'works' I forcast the time when it will become mandatory for everybody.

    --
    zenray
  57. This was on USA TV a week ago by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Video shot mostly in Japan... showed as being a hot idem for wifes whos husbands had a tendency to, er, stray...this way they knew if the hubbies were at work, or some bar.....

    They also pointed out how (with two cell phones) you have have a cheap James Bond like tracking device [Turn one on; toss it into someones car; then track on your second cell phone]

    Woooooweeeee !

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  58. Missing children.. by johnsjs · · Score: 1

    Just down the road from where I live two ten year old girls disappeared last Sunday. The police have just been reduced to making a public announcement to any abductor as follows: 'I've left a message on ..[one of the girl's].. mobile phone with details of how to contact me, please do so' as they have absolutely no leads. Whilst this tracking device is not an ideal solution (unless you absolutely trust anyone that can get hold of the tracking signal) to the problem of losing people, I can see it being very popular with parents.

  59. Soccer Moms, SUVs and LoJack for children by ellem · · Score: 2

    Face it these things are going to be hot. The media ia hyping the SHIT out of child abductions like they are new phenomenon. Truth is they ARE DOWN from recent years! But you local news has decided that this ISSUE needs MORE coverage. Who knows maybe it does....

    Point being you still need to be a parent. You can strap whatever you want on your kid, be it this a leash, a small ferocious otter, what have you, BUT you still have to parent your child.

    Hopefully this will on be a tool not a solution. I don't want soccer mom trucking down Main Street in her 5000lb Ford Leviathan looking at the web page showing her that her kid is next door. I also don't want people to think this is some kid of auto pilot for resposibilty.

    My daughter can't be pregnant! She has a GPS.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  60. Re:You guys are missing the point... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

    Kids need freedom. Within limits, but freedom to explore.


    Too many people say, when confronted with this topic, that devices like this somehow harm or constrain children in ways that they shouldn't be constrained. What you said is exactly right. Children need freedom within limits. They don't need the capability to deny their parents knowledge of their whereabouts. It is a parent's right and obligation to set boundaries, their responsibility to provide a safe way for those boundaries to be explored. If I can have reliable assistance from modern technology, I can enlarge those boundaries. If I can't then they remain more constrained.


    As for employees, I don't think this is useful in many cases, but perhaps in some. It's entirely reasonable, IMO, to GPS an armored car and possibly the drivers for the duration of their work day.

  61. Interesting Idea, but overall not very useful by Edrick · · Score: 1
    While this idea has some merit, I don't see it as a viable solution to parenting worries.

    There are many issues that make these sorts of tracking solutions far from foolproof, or even relaiable.

    First of all, for a tracking device to even be remotely effective, the recipient must either be oblivious to it, or be accepting of it's use. In young children this shouldn't be an issue aside from the possiblity it could be broken (obviously such a device wouldn't be a cell phone or pager, but something much simpler)

    For much older kids, this becomes somewhat pointless, and also bordering on ethical concerns as I doubt many older teens would appreciate being tracked everywhere they go, even if the intention is security.

    Tracking a Cell Phone or Pager is only useful if the device is on, the betteries are OK, and the device is within range of a signal. Extreme hikers/climbers have discussed this idea as well as a method of security for themselves in case of an accident, but ran into major issues due to lack of signal range in more remote places.

    Lastly, tracking employees...in my opinion, if you don't trust your employees enough to do their jobs properly and be in the right place, then there is obviously something wrong somewhere. I don't think tracking of this nature would benefit anyone except for paranoid/control freak bosses. I am pretty sure employees would object to such impositions as well, most likely hurting morale and, to a lesser extent, productivity.

    Good ideas, but very few viable applications that wouldnt be excessively invasive or ineffective. Monitoring babies and young children is the only application of tracking that would seem worthwhile, and I doubt many of them are running around with cell phones or pagers (ie we'd need a new device to track with anyway; that's nothing new to this field.

  62. Why this product will be out less than a year. by TrekBody · · Score: 1

    It's a great idea, but what happens when the first kidnapper cuts off a little kid's hand to remove the thing?

    Abductions are down - don't believe the hype!

    --
    Jim - your name is Jim...
  63. ATT Wireless has this by austad · · Score: 3, Informative

    ATT Wireless has this now with their M-mode service. You give friends permission to locate you, and they can just go to "location services" on the phone, and it tells where you're at. It's accurate to within a block.

    Their "find businesses" thing can use it too, so you can find the closest gas station, restaraunt, or strip club.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:ATT Wireless has this by PatJensen · · Score: 2
      I use it with my wife all the time, we can even set up a place to have Lunch nearby. It even sends you an SMS when your spouse is trying to locate you. It's really cool!

      I love my T68i!

      -Pat

  64. When do Impants Become Mandatory by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Once all Amercians have them, then everyone will be safe and secure.

    Its all 'for the children'...

    yes this is sarcasm.. For those sheep out there that dont have a clue..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  65. Sweatshops? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    This could be useful in the sweatshops where you have children and workers at the very same time! They'll never run off after their smoke breaks again.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  66. The real problem... by n9hmg · · Score: 2

    ...is that we let child molesters live.
    I'm not talking about the 17 year old with the 15-year-old girlfriend, crossing arbitrary legal lines. I'm talking about perverts.
    I'd like to see a government sting, where somebody fakes up a NAMBLA cruise to southeast Asia(they go there to fuck children), get them in international waters, and drown the lot of them.
    Every conviction on child molestation should be a mandator death penalty. The law tries to take the well-being of the offenders into account. I disagree. There are some crimes which bring the forfeit of status as a human.
    I can see sparing somebody for a crime of passion. There are murderers among us who are good people and will never do it again.
    There is no child molester who ever was redeemed. I'm sure there are some who were never convicted again, maybe even never charged, maybe even never did it again, but they must never be permitted the opportunity for unsupervised access to children again. The best way to do that is to kill them the first time they reveal themselves. Yeah, they were probably taught by getting molested themselves. That really is sad, but it doesn't change the fact that they should be dead. If the certainty of death keeps them from acting on their desires, they won't spread the disease. I'm perfectly willing to spare people with perverted thoughts that never have been put into action, but it's better that a billion repented criminals die than that one child should suffer.
    I keep close watch on my children. It would take overwhelming force to take one in my presence, or great stealth to get one out of the house while I sleep.

    1. Re:The real problem... by Deimosuva · · Score: 1

      "but it's better that a billion repented criminals die than that one child should suffer." A billion repented criminals? Are you serious? So you're saying, that any number of people who have gone to jail, done their time and paid their debt to society should die rather than one single child? Especially if they have repented, which means they have learned their lesson, will not become repeat offenders, and will become productive members of society. Once they've paid their debt, they become innocent civilians again, just like you or me. Can you really say you would rather have "a billion" adults die rather than one child? What is the point of that?

    2. Re:The real problem... by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      Every conviction on child molestation should be a mandator death penalty.

      In a perfect system, where there are no mistakes that would be a good thing, but everybody makes mistakes, what if a day/week/year after somebody's death-penalty it's seems te be wrong? You can't just revive him/her! I think putting them in jail for the rest of their lives is a much better punishment than death, make them suffer, and that goes for (almost) every crime. But I'm just too scared for the fact that somebody gets punished while (s)he shouldn't be.

      But then again, I'm from the Netherlands...

      Or like that.. [LOTR: insert wise words from Gandalf]

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
    3. Re:The real problem... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      its a very touchy subject. I agree that child molesters are bad bad people. And I usually think that they should get the mandatory death penalty - but its tough when you do realize that they were most likely molested as children themselves.

      whats hard is - if you think that all molesters should just be killed - then by extension should we just kill the child that they have just molested? Wont that child grow up to be a molester? so shouldnt we just kill them?

      On days I think that we should just flat out shoot the people who are convicted of molesting/killing/raping/harming children. no prison time. just guilty - walk em out back and shoot them - or throw them in a crematorium... alive.

      nambla should just be illegal period. they should all be drowned as you state.... its tough.

      whats really really sad is the situation that people live in - places like thailand. forced prostitution of children, and the very very seriously rampant methamphedamine addiction that has swept thailand over the last five years. There are children as young as 5 that are drug runners for the dealers there - they use small girls because they know that the police will not stop and seach small girls. then as they get older they get them hooked on their meth. its called yahewa or something... and costs about a dollar for a pill. you can eat/drink/snort or smoke the shit - and it wrecks you.

      this is very serious for several reasons: rampant drug use by the young populace who become addicted - and are forced into sex slavery - and spread aids. Thailand has very high HIV infection rates. (botswana is the worst, with something like 39% of the countries population having aids)

      a very very sad state we are moving into in the next 20 years. They said that 60 million people will die of aids. and with the rate that things are going... nobody is going to care - so long as they have money.

    4. Re:The real problem... by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      You just made me write out another check to NAMBLA...

      --

      Considered harmful.
    5. Re:The real problem... by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised that you are willing to do that, only that you have any money left since your last vacation to Thailand.

    6. Re:The real problem... by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      they become innocent civilians again
      No, hey become released child molesters.
      paid their debt
      What debt? Does the suffering of the criminal in jail somehow fix the damage he's done, or the damage that he will do when he is released? I'm a mean old bastard, but someone else suffering makes me feel bad. I can't imagine knowing someone is suffering helping to heal a child. I have no desire to hurt anyone, unless it makes the world a better place. I see no reason to "punish" a criminal at all. Punishment is a negative stimulus, part of behavioural training, for beings who can't learn from example. What keeps my son(age 3, autistic) from climbing onto the stove and pulling a pot of boiling water onto himself is that he knows his butt suddenly stings whenever he reaches for the stove. What keeps a pervert from touching my children is the certainty of a short and painful life, should he act on that impulse. What I'd do to him wouldn't do a thing to make what he did right. It would prevent him from doing anything ever again, and serve as a warning, even though I would go to prison or the gallows. I've got a lot of family, and most of them aren't as nice as me. Reform and deterrence should be the goals of our criminal justice system.
      Large numbers of released sex offenders disappear, refusing to register so they can be watched. If they were "cured", they wouldn't need to escape surveillance. They disappear so they can do it again. Those who obey the registration requirements just have to be more careful.
      Unlike most crimes, sexual predation is not a product of changeable circumstances, where with some therapy and alteration of circumstances, the criminal is a useful, good person.
      The only safe and moral course is to segregate them from all other humans. That doesn't mean put them all together. They'd all just victimize each other. We don't want to send them to hell.
      And yes, I know that most of them were, in turn, molested. I still don't see how that makes it ok to let them free to do it again. It's not about the criminal. His rights are junior to those of his victims.

  67. Nothing a pair of boltcutters wouldn't fix. by JediCeleste · · Score: 1

    All right, so most likely the parents who'd strap this on wouldn't allow their sheltered little brat near anything pointy. Looking at this, though.. it would be sickeningly easy to snap the plastic band with small hedge trimmers/boltcutters/large diagonal cutters or any other common hand tool. Reasonably intelligent children and potential abductors will both figure this out.

    The only REALLY secure tracker is an implantable chip, and I pity the poor cattle^H^H^H^H^H^Hchild at that point.

  68. DAG NABBIT! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    AMERICANS. Not USians. AMERICANS. Damn New Age crap.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:DAG NABBIT! by Deimosuva · · Score: 1

      Dude, there are 2 continents that fall under the name "America." We don't call Mexicans or Canadians "Americans," so why should we, who live in the United States of America be called Americans? Is someone from Brazil called an American? If you can come up with a better name than "USians" I'd like to hear it.

    2. Re:DAG NABBIT! by rworne · · Score: 1
      Simple: US, Canada, Mexico: North America/North Americans
      Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, etc.: Central America/Central Americans
      Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, Argentina, Chile, etc.: South America/South Americans

      Wow, look, I got all those right, without resorting to the web AND I am a graduate of the US Public school system. Amazing.

      The problem isn't the continent, it's the nationalism. I never heard a Canadian or Mexican national bitching about being called American, unless they were called that in error.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    3. Re:DAG NABBIT! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The full formal name of the US is The United States of AMERICA. Canda does't have the word "America" in its full formal name. Neither does Mexico. But the US does. Thats why we call ourselves Americans. ITS IN THE NAME OF OUR COUNTRY!!!!

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  69. Whoa! The real issue! by boskone · · Score: 1

    I think the real issue is that this will train a generation of kids to expect ZERO privacy and be ready to embrace big brother with open arms.

    I'm a stepdad and I know how hard it is to keep an eye on kids. We worry when the 11 year old rollerblades the 1/2 mile through the subdivision to grandma's house, so there is appeal to this technology, but still, from a larger social perspective I think it's very, very dangerous to indoctrinate ourselves and kids into thinking that it's "normal" to be tracked electronically.

    See someone's comment above regarding the all in one chip that is coming.

  70. What next? by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

    How long until someone tries to make these things mandatory? Better yet, someone suing the government so that we all have to have them implanted when we're born! Better still, having them wipe any part of our brains that may hold music we didn't pay for!

  71. From the "It's a little creepy in here" Department by xenolaeus · · Score: 1

    Slashdot presents: "Tracking your Employees' Children"

  72. Still vaporware, and on Slashdot before by Animats · · Score: 2
    This thing has been on Slashdot before. And it's still not shipping.

    This thing is suspicious. It's not shipping until September, but they're taking orders, with "4-6 week delivery". That's a bad sign.

    The pricing is terrible. The thing costs more than a cell phone. There's a $340 up-front cost (there's an "activation fee" hidden in there), plus a monthly fee of $25-$50 per month. You can get a good cell phone and cell phone service, maybe even with GPS, for that price. The service is way overpriced, considering that it is basically a 2-way pager.

    It's also on a 1.9GHz PCS network, only. So there's a coverage problem. It doesn't have backup capability to go out to something with broad coverage, like AMPS analog cellular, or something cops have, like Lojak, or, ideally, a satellite.

    It does, though, have the cool "locks on the wrist" feature, with remote unlock, no less. And if you cut the wristband, it calls for help.

    This sounds like a market test. If enough preorders come in, they'll actually make some. Maybe. More likely, some cell phone manufacturer will do this better and take over this niche.

  73. Useful in some situations by FJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll bet Disney & other major theme parks love this. They can buy them by the gross, charge $50 a day and parents can attach them to their kids in case they get lost. It increases safety & makes them money. Everything Disney loves (especially the money part).

    I doubt the average person would poney up $400 when 99.99% of the time there isn't any real concern. I'd be more curious how a 3 year old deals with a device being attached to his/her wrist. Mine would start screaming after a few minutes. He doesn't like paper wristbands from a local amusement park being on his wrist for more than 5 minutes, much less a device which is bulky & he can't remove.

    And for the people who raise privacy concerns, get over it. Kids have no privacy, they never have and never will.

    Before technology parents still spied on their kids. They put a phone in a central location, searched rooms when the kids were not there, watched the odometer on a car to see how far they've been driving. 20 years ago, few kids had a television in their room because parents actually cared what their kids were watching.

    As a parent, the idea isn't to be a friend to your kid. When they are young you protect them. As they get older you give them more freedom. The difficulty is that too much freedom and a kid can hurt themself, too little and they don't learn what they need to survive on their own.

    Sometimes the need to protect & the need to give freedom are very conflicting and, when in doubt, some parents go for the hyper conservative approach.

  74. prior art by rakerman · · Score: 2
    I hope this company has a lot of quadloos to pay the Triskelians for infringing their idea.

    The Gamesters of Triskelion

    Or maybe the Providers will start selling their collars in the US market.

  75. Reminds me of... by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of an article I read a few years ago about a similar system in Japan, except the information was made available on a website. It seems it was canceled after only a few weeks of service. A few irate housewives had checked on the husband's location when they claimed to be working late at the office.... they weren't even CLOSE to the office ;)

    --
    Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
  76. Been there^H^H^H^Hhere. by E_elven · · Score: 1

    We here at the peak of the modern technology have had the ability to track eachother's locations via cellphones for some time now.
    E

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  77. They have a similar system in Japan by greggman · · Score: 1

    It is part of a bluetooth based home automation system. Push a button, Junior's location appears on a map. (of course the tracking device does not use bluetooth)

  78. Sleeptime != safetime by Xebikr · · Score: 1

    Anyone who thinks their kids are safe when they are at home in bed with you in the house has a false sense of security. In our area this past June a 14 year old girl was kidnapped at gun point from her bedroom. Her sister was in the room with her and was told if she made any noise or told her parents, then her sister would die. Her parents were sleeping down the hall completely unaware. (Should they have been in the room with her?) She still hasn't been located over two months later. See here for more info.

    Don't you dare think that keeping your kids safe is simply a matter of raising them right. All the training in the world won't stop a determined but sick individual from harming them. Perhaps if Elizabeth had been wearing one of these her parents could have found her that same night.

  79. The concept of this technology by jsse · · Score: 2

    is to use a special GSM sim card return signals to nearest 6 GSM base-stations. The central computer can determine the approx. location of this person within this 6 base-stations.

    The accuracy is only up to ~25M diameter. However it's still good as civilian GPS does not give accurate result due to the fact that US Government deliberately inserting noise in GPS reading for non-military use. (it's THEIR GPS satalites nevertheless. :)

    However, it has several problems:

    1) Special GSM sim must be made
    2) It's very proprietary that different telcos have different implementations of it
    3) The worker can always turn off the phone to hide his location(it can only be solved by firing that insubordinate staff :/)
    4) Last but most important, it does not work on the sea, because there are no base station there. The tracking system will always return the location of the nearest shore.

    If look as if 4) is not a big problem, but don't forget Hong Kong has a pretty big harbour in the middle, and in fact people working on the sea needs this technology badly!

    1. Re:The concept of this technology by jsse · · Score: 2

      Btw, I found that people here thought that Hong Kong's location based system is equals to GPS system. It's in fact a system running on GSM network with special sim card and a normal mobile phone.

      It's more accurate that civilian GPS system as I mentioned above. Besides, Pinpoint relys heavily on the telco providing that services to them. They are only marketing this technology. Besides, they sell security system and GPS too.

  80. Re:You guys are missing the point... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    And they also need to be taught, and held to it, that the boundraies set are for a reason.

    "You may not go beyond streets X, Y, and Z"
    The responsibility to follow this rule needs to come from the child, not a microchip.

    When those boundraies are broken (and a good parent should be able to find this out), there should be consequences. "You broke curfew. No donuts for you".

    At what point do you take the watch off? Age 18? "OK, son...you're a man now. You may go where you please" Said child never having learned to follow rules because they are good rules, as opposed to "this thing on my arm will tattle on me".

  81. Tracking via workwear by Stephen+R+Hall · · Score: 1

    Some commericial laundries use RF tags (similar to those used to tag pets) in workwear to track them through their factories. This can quite easily be adapted to track each time the wearer of a garment goes to the toilet, has a coffee break, cigarette brake, moves from one area to another... , and this technology is mature and proven.

  82. Nope, not first by mattr · · Score: 2

    For some years a similar service has been available for keeping track of elderly family members. You could get a fax of where they are on a map. Phone was shaped like a popular comic character, Doraemon (the 24th century blue robotic cat).

  83. Re:You guys are missing the point... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

    I'm curious, when did you start following rules because they're good for you? Have you yet? I disobeyed my parents until the moment I moved out, even when their rules were "good rules". I've been known to occasionally bend the speed limit and may have even run a red light or two at 3:00 am when the roads were deserted. Children make their own judgements on what rules are good rules. Generally speaking, their decisions are not the decisions they'd make as adults. They tend to underestimate risk.