Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.1 Beta Released

shadow303 writes "KDE 3.1 beta has been released. There are numerous improvements, including tabbed browsing with Konqueror." I still can't say I care for tabbed browsing, but a lot of people swear by it. The new style/theme looks quite excellent, as do the various improved dialog boxes.

355 comments

  1. kdestudio (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know where to download the old (free) kdestudio?

    1. Re:kdestudio (offtopic) by nocomment · · Score: 0

      http://www.thekompany.com/projects/kdestudio/

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  2. 3.1? by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gnome is only 2.0 so I guess KDE is better right?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:3.1? by plugger · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think I'll wait for KDE 3.11 for workgroups.

    2. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, there are still several releases yet:

      KDE 3.11 for Workgroups
      KDE NT 3.5
      KDE NT 3.51 (first stable release)
      KDE 95, 98, 98SE (crap)
      KDE 2000 (next stable release, use this)

    3. Re:3.1? by dzym · · Score: 2
      Same way Netscape 6.0 was better than IE 5.5.

      ... but Gnome sucks anyway.

    4. Re:3.1? by red_dragon · · Score: 3, Funny
      I think I'll wait for KDE 3.11 for workgroups.

      But we'll have to wait 93 years for the release of KDE '95.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    5. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot: KDE XP (Jesus on toast)

    6. Re:3.1? by glwtta · · Score: 2

      yeah, but Linux is 7.3, so it's better than both.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    7. Re:3.1? by Ig0r · · Score: 1

      Emacs is 21.2, it is best.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    8. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but Linux is 7.3

      !!!!
      You must be from the future. Please, tell us how we can travel forward into time!

      If you are still scratching that big mellon of yours look at the version of your DISTRO, then look at the version of your KERNEL and determine which is which.

    9. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you'll notice there was fuck all coverage for GNOME 2.0.1. Slashdot is just a KDE super-fan hang-out these days (just watch this get modded down).

    10. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gnome sucks, and it sucks for exactly one big simple reason: its icon. It's a footprint. I don't want to have a stinky foot on my computer.

      I suppose I should be just be grateful that the KDE crew didn't use a dog turd as their icon. I'd have to go back to fvwm.

    11. Re:3.1? by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Just hope and pray that they don't call KDE 4.0 "KDE Warp".

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    12. Re:3.1? by grytpype · · Score: 2

      Wine is at 2002xxxx, so it is superior to everything!

      --

      - Have a picture

    13. Re:3.1? by artificial_blue · · Score: 1

      I love my KDE windows-like interface with all of it's pleasant sounds and and cute gears!! I thought I was getting Gnome just looks better to me..

    14. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahhahahahah.. somepeople can't get a joke. Fucking idiots

    15. Re:3.1? by xactoguy · · Score: 1

      What about KDE 3.1415962 for us l33t people? They have to offer something for everyone, after all...

      --


      And so we go, on with our lives
      We know the truth, but prefer lies
      Lies are simple, simple is bliss
    16. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. 55% better, to be exact.

    17. Re:3.1? by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      For the record, I haven't had much trouble with KD- er, I mean Windows 98SE. And you forgot to mention KDE ME (unholy festering bucket of crap release) ;)

    18. Re:3.1? by daRcmaTTeR · · Score: 1

      why yes...as a matter of fact that is exactly what it means.

    19. Re:3.1? by soloport · · Score: 2

      7. In your opinion, what can bring Linux closer to the "desktop"? Some friggin' decent font support, folks! That's what's needed in Linux. That's probably all that's needed -- given KDE's other features. How do we do this? What would help the most? Are there patent or other IP issues? What's the problem here?

    20. Re:3.1? by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      Strange as is sounds, this is actually one of the reasons I chose KDE over GNOME. Desktops are largely about aesthetics anyway (most GNOME apps run fine under KDE, Nautilus included), and I found the footprint theme ugly.

      I also prefer KDE's taskbar and config, so at least I have some *slightly* less silly sounding reasons :)

    21. Re:3.1? by MamasGun · · Score: 1

      Red Hat does not necessarily equal Linux.

      --
      "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
      -- Jack Valenti
    22. Re:3.1? by glwtta · · Score: 2

      wow.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    23. Re:3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is 3.1415927 not 3.1415962 you "133t" people...

    24. Re:3.1? by rat7307 · · Score: 1
      What about KDE 3.1415962 for us l33t people? They have to offer something for everyone, after all...

      KDE pi ???.... mmmm pie.......

      --
      Burma?
    25. Re:3.1? by swright · · Score: 2

      The problem is that good quality fonts are extremely time consuming and hard to make; so no-one wants to give them away for free.

      There is the Luxi font set donated by Bigelow & Holmes which seems quite popular, but I can't say I like them much :(

      XFree has Luxi fonts: http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/fonts3.html

      Microsoft's free fonts are of excellent quality though, and they're still available at the link below (completely legally too!):

      http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/

  3. Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by RebelTycoon · · Score: 0, Troll

    Another beta is out... Hurry, everyone, new beta, new beta, new beta...

    BTW... Haven't heard in a while, what Kernel version is Linux up to...

    Because nerds need to know every point!

    1. Re:Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by unicron · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you're nipping at the heels of us nerds. Why you gotta playa hate?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playa hate 'r'

      No dawg... I'm just saying no need for every point announcement... But today is a slow day...

      Much respect to the peeps in the ghetto! Keep it real r-eye-t

    3. Re:Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghetto grammar correction:

      Playa hater - one who hates players.
      Playa hate - the act of hating players.

    4. Re:Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: Knock Knock!!! 2: Who is it... 1: Glass Ceiling 2: Glass Ceiling Who? 1: Doesn't matter nigga, you ain't getting thru

    5. Re:Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: How do you stop the niggers from jumping up and down on the bed?
      A: Put velcro on the ceiling.

    6. Re:Oh My Gosh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my gosh that's so funny...

  4. Tabbed browsing by LunarOne · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Tabbed browsing is, of course, the bomb! I can't use IE anymore because of it. I middle click on links with IE and when nothing happens, it is just so annoying. It's like browsing in a dark place.

    Frsit Psot?

    --

    Read my sig if you like, but I'll never see yours, thanks to Discussions, Viewing, Disable sigs...
    1. Re:Tabbed browsing by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Middle clicking to open a new window has become ingrained in my browsing habits. Now if Mozilla/Netscape would just put a close button on every tab the way Galeon does. I despise switching to the tab then closing or having to right click on the tab to get the context menu.

    2. Re:Tabbed browsing by Arnold_Crenshaw · · Score: 0

      Simply use CTRL+W.

    3. Re:Tabbed browsing by Dopefish_1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I despise switching to the tab then closing or having to right click on the tab to get the context menu.
      So middle-click on the tab instead.

      --

      #include <sig.h>
    4. Re:Tabbed browsing by phraktyl · · Score: 2

      Use -W to close them. The combination of middle-click to open tabs and -W to close them is hard to beat.

      I'm really starting to like the click the middle-button and drag left to go back a page or right to go forward in Galeon. I need to find out if you can close windows that way as well...

      Wyatt

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    5. Re:Tabbed browsing by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      That's why we use hotkeys- Ctrl-W is your friend. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    6. Re:Tabbed browsing by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2

      The feature that makes IE unusable for me is the lack of gesture recognition. It took me all of 11 seconds to get used to "swiping" a page back. Now I can't bear the wait while I move the pointer all the way up to that Back button.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    7. Re:Tabbed browsing by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Ctrl-W works great, but it's still a 2 step process. As was pointed out by another response, middle clicking the tab also closes it. This I did not know, and having just tried it, I'm now much happier with Netscape 7.

    8. Re:Tabbed browsing by SnotRag · · Score: 1

      In mozilla, you can middle-click on the tab to close it, regardless of focus. I actually prefer this to Galeon's separate close button. Though in Mozilla I much prefer the way it dynamically resizes tabs when they get to the end of the screen. Anyone know if this can be done in Galeon?

    9. Re:Tabbed browsing by uberdave · · Score: 1

      The thing I like about tabbed browsing is that those annoying pop-up/pop-under ads merely open up a new tab. You never see them.

    10. Re:Tabbed browsing by yasth · · Score: 1

      Shift+Scrolling the wheel down = Back in IE

      Isn't quite a gesture but is helpful.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    11. Re:Tabbed browsing by zudo · · Score: 1
      Install this in Mozilla and you can use gestures there too.

      Defaults to right button to use gestures but I soon reconfigured to use the middle one....

    12. Re:Tabbed browsing by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 1

      Tabbed browsing rocks the house, except for that painful adjustment period where you're finished with one site so you close the window, then realize you had 5 other sites in other tabs that you just closed.

      Gives you a feeling akin to realizing you left your keys in the car just as you let go of the car door. Not quite as bad, but annoying.

      --
      m00.
    13. Re:Tabbed browsing by blackula · · Score: 1

      You sir are my new god.

    14. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldnt it be #include "sig.h" ?

    15. Re:Tabbed browsing by qnonsense · · Score: 1

      One thing you can say about MS, is that their mice (I know the didn't design them, but they were the first) are damned good. Even swiping is harder than just hitting the back button on my mouse. Really, any mouse with less than 5 buttons is a kids toy to me now. I have five fingers, for God's sake, why not use them?

      --
      There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
    16. Re:Tabbed browsing by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
      " The thing I like about tabbed browsing is that those annoying pop-up/pop-under ads merely open up a new tab. You never see them."

      Or you could turn them off altogether, y'know. Check the prefs.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    17. Re:Tabbed browsing by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm sorry, but tabs are a feature I always turn off. I mean, I'm not mad they're there, but I tried using them and didn't like them. The basic problem with tabs is that they force you to switch windows at two totally different places on your desktop.

      I imagine that I am fairly typical in that I have several browser pages up at any one time, and in addition to that, I have some other apps open (music player, IRC, news program, file manager, etc). The reason I have all that stuff open is because I switch between them, and I want to do this efficiently.

      However, to switch from my newsreader to a "submerged" tab on Konqueror or Mozilla, I first have to use my WM to swith to the browser, and then use the browser interface to switch to the proper tab. What makes this process even more lame is that at least in Mozilla, the tabs are on the opposite end of the screen from where I switch tasks on my WM. This means I have to do a lot of unnecessary mousing around.

      A much more sensible approach is to open new browser windows rather than tabs, and then do all of your switching using the WM. One of the many advantages of this is that you can use keyboard shortcuts to cycle through all your windows, browser and the rest.

      All in all, I find myself wishing that Konqueror developers would concentrate more on rendering performance and standards compliance. I suspect that tabs are a gimmick that will be requested only by a tiny but vocal minority. It's my opinion that if you feel like you need tabs, there is something wrong with your window manager (or you don't know how to use it right).

    18. Re:Tabbed browsing by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I did not know that. I'm somewhat new to Galeon.

    19. Re:Tabbed browsing by Teancom · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, they were almost completely implemented by somebody that is not a "hardcore" konq/khtml developer. I.e., somebody decided they really wanted them, wrote them up, and then several other people helped with the debugging and configuration. I really wish I remembered the guy's name, but it's actually been a few months, and my memory is poor :-P But here, like in all other open source projects, the stuff gets done that people want. If the vocal minority includes somebody with the talent to implement tabs, then, guess what, here you go :-) And enough different people have piped up about loving tabs, that I think it is more than just a matter of "not knowing how to use their window manager".

      All that said, I dislike tabs, tried them, and haven't used them since B-)

    20. Re:Tabbed browsing by Ig0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have five fingers

      I could fix that...

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    21. Re:Tabbed browsing by Alan · · Score: 2

      The main difference between IE and the mozilla/galeon/konq/operas of the world is that because IE is the monopoly, they don't have to *care* what make a good browser.

      For example, IE will probably *never* implement things like pop up blocking, a cookie dialogue that doesn't suck (more info doesn't stay out), or any of the really funky and innovative things that Konq/mozilla does.

      Because MS is the big fish, they have to be friendly to everyone, and that includes places that do things like pop up ads (msn for example), so adding in that ability is counter productive to them, as is things like opening up the API enough that projects like those at mozdev can exist.

    22. Re:Tabbed browsing by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      If you have to use IE (And cant bitch slap the webmaster) try Crazy Browser. It will give you tabs, and stop pop ups. Middle mouse button works also.. Then complete it with Proxomitron and you can do almost anything. Proxomitron is kinda like junkbusters for windows, more options, gui interface, proxy switcher, very nice.
      -
      Open Letter To America from a Canadian

    23. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - he obviously has a global sig.h that he uses throughout his system - and has therefore placed it in a library directory.

      Derek

    24. Re:Tabbed browsing by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I use my side mouse buttons, 4 for forward, 5 for back. With a 3 button mouse I could see a use, but what else do you use gestures for?
      -
      Read at your own risk - Open Letter to America from a Canadian

    25. Re:Tabbed browsing by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a little X button in the tab would be extremely useful, I love tabbed browsing, but the right click is kinda annoying.

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    26. Re:Tabbed browsing by Masem · · Score: 3, Informative
      While I can't argue with the concept of more work to get to given tabbed page from outside the application, the use of tabs currently solves a problem that until recently most GUI elements has with task switching, in that every instance of a SDI (single document interface) application would be listed in the task bar-like area. Thus, if you had multiple browser windows open, your task bar would be swamped with each window's title, and given all the other likely stuff you'd be running it would be difficult to determine the distinction of the different windows without some other mechanism or checking each one separately. Even without the task bar, using some application switcher may generate an overly long list, which could be hard to navigate or slower to use than normal tab switching. Newer GUIs (including XP and KDE2/3) are more intelligent now and will group multiple instances of the same application into the same task 'button', providing a popup menu to select the specific instance of that application. But when Opera and Mozilla were being developed into their current reincarnations, this wasn't a feature, and given that most developers or users will have several browser windows open at a time, compared to any other SDI-type application besides editors, it's not a suprise this feature was added. (And even in the case of editors, I noticed that a lot of the windows shareware and commercial packages have had the options of tabs to switch between open files, showing the same problem as multiple browser windows.)

      Now, I dont' have Moz handy currently, but I do know that Opera allows you to place the tabs at the bottom of the page; I want to say Moz does too. Thus, in your case, you could jump to the Opera app from the bottom task bar, then use bottom tabs to find the right tab; mouse movement is limited, and locating the right page should be faster. Tab location (above, below, off) has almost always been an option in any program that I've seen them used effectively.

      The other consideration is that maybe, there needs to be a way for apps to communicate to the task-bar/applications list as to describe all the current instances that are open. Thus, regardless if the program is tabbed or not, clicking on the task bar button for that program would should all instances of it, and selecting the appropriate instance would either go to that window, or bring the right tab forward. This, of course, is not trivial to work back into most GUI frameworks currently.

      But, most important, tabs should be optional: some people love multiple windows, some don't. Appropriately written, the additional feature of tabs should be very light weight and ignorable when not used.

      --
      "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
      "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    27. Re:Tabbed browsing by uchian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gestures are cool! I've set Mozilla to automatically press the submit button for me when I move my mouse like thi

    28. Re:Tabbed browsing by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      Why not just make the browser more key interactive and put your hand back on the keyboard where it belongs? :)

      QUESTION!

      Where can I get Debian .debs for KDE3 (beta would be nice, but not essential) and Gnome 2? I vowed I was done messing around with compiling these two beasts from source... it's a severe PITA.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    29. Re:Tabbed browsing by qnonsense · · Score: 1
      Why not just make the browser more key interactive and put your hand back on the keyboard where it belongs? :)
      • Because, the keyboard is a text input device that's good for text input. The mouse is a 2D input device that's good for navigating 2D spaces. The web (these days) is a (layered) 2D space. Hence, the mouse is the best (common) tool for navigating it. Why not make the browser more key-friendly? Because you'd have to make the web more key-friendly first, and that'd be fucking tough.
      --
      There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
    30. Re:Tabbed browsing by Ageless+Stranger · · Score: 1

      I can't seem to get a google toolbar on Crazy Browser. This Browser looks nice, but you can't expect a man to live without the google toolbar!

    31. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried a KDE mirror?

    32. Re:Tabbed browsing by Hammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah Thumb used for the ball, leaves 4...

    33. Re:Tabbed browsing by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, the only thing missing from the GUI browsers that would make them more keyboard friendly is a sense of getting TAB to go to the first link on that page-- not the next link in the document. Example: I can read a Slashdot thread just fine using page up/down, I can back up a page using Alt-left-arrow, but if I press tab to get to a link, I have to cycle through EVERY link on a page. Bad news. If tab started with the first visible link on the page, this would not be a problem. I can do an awful lot of browsing already without ever touching my mouse.

      Links, a text mode browser, operates in this fashion.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    34. Re:Tabbed browsing by stype · · Score: 1

      They could be a tad redundant if you have a window list on your screen. But I personally do not. I use multiple desktops and rarely have windows overlapping other windows, but browsers are the big exception. Web browsers are the only application I use (that I can think of) where I frequently open more than one window and need an easy way to switch between them. Tabbed browsing fixes this (I used to just alt-tab between em).

      --
      -Stype
      Bus error -- driver executed.
    35. Re:Tabbed browsing by chavo+valdez · · Score: 1

      Just type the search terms in the address bar and hit alt+enter. completely configurable of course, but that is the default.

    36. Re:Tabbed browsing by petis · · Score: 2

      Tabbed browsing? What's wrong with emacs + w3? ;)

    37. Re:Tabbed browsing by Kowh · · Score: 1

      I agree that using tabbed browsing by itself isn't very likeable, you end up with many little tabs in one window that has it's own task list separate from that of the OS. I don't however, use windowed browsing by itself either. I use a combination of the two with Mozilla that involves grouping related sites in windows with tabs. This really helps in managing browsing on sites such as Slashdot, where each story gets its own window, and each link from that story gets its own tab within that window. Each window is then a self-contained group of sites related to the main Slashdot story that I can return to after an interruption or other delay and not have to restablish the relationships of open sites.

      But to each their own, if this style of browsing doesn't appeal to you, then don't use it. I encourage those who normally detest tabbed browsing to try it, I found it helped organize my "browsing experience". This "system" however, isn't for those who browse one-window one-site-at-a-time and don't take advantage of windows or tabs. It is really only appreciated when you have many sites open at one time, especially when related sites are slow to load and can be relegated to a tab until they finish loading.

    38. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And taking mozilla (or I believe galeon uses the same bindings) as an example...

      ctrl+pgup or ctrl+pgdn switch between tabs.

      Where is the extra amount of mousing there? I can't stand using the mouse, and that is one of the reasons I LIKE tabs. I use KDE's bindings to say CTRL+arrows switch desktops, and I keep one application running in each desktop.

      With a hotkey for konsole, one for mozilla, and keys to switch between them, all I use the mouse for is to move the cursor out of the way of my typing.

    39. Re:Tabbed browsing by chavo+valdez · · Score: 1

      Check your calendar. emacs is so 1985.

    40. Re:Tabbed browsing by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2

      I really must point out that I have also discovered tabbed browsing recently.

      I find it absolutely handy. Why? Because I can open multiple links without the focus shifting to those new links.

      Then I just tab through them when I want to view the next page, which, has already loaded.

      Handy for busy sites that take forever to load as well. (slashdotted sites for example)

      Just my $.02, to each their own.

      - Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    41. Re:Tabbed browsing by EvilAlien · · Score: 2

      Konqueror doesn't seem to respond to the gestures I make at it...

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    42. Re:Tabbed browsing by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      At least in the windows version there is a small x button on the far right, of the tab bar, that closes a tab. It isn't in exactly the same place as Opera's was, but I would occasionally kill the app when I was going for a window in opera.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    43. Re:Tabbed browsing by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The last time I really liked gestures was when I had a touchpad, Opera's gestures seemed more intuative on that. I don't use them now that I have a real mouse.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    44. Re:Tabbed browsing by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      When i click on a tab with my middle button, it closes, and the tab that pops to the front tries to load the URL that is in the copy/paste clipboard. I'm using Linux, and it's fairly normal on UNIX for a browser to navigate to the URL that is in the clipboard when the middle mouse button is clicked. Is there any way to stop Mozilla doing this imediately after a tab has been closed, because it is quite annoying?

    45. Re:Tabbed browsing by fobbman · · Score: 2

      Flipping Jon Katz off every time he posts a story.

    46. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice waste of screen estate, why put close buttons on all the tabs when you can put it in one area to close the current one.

      of course, I see your point, each window typically has it's close box.

    47. Re:Tabbed browsing by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Do you have the KDE gesture program running? You can make any KDE program work with gestures with it, so Konqueror itself doesn't have genture recognition in it.

      I don't use it, so I can't recall the name... I don't even know that it's part of kdebase.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    48. Re:Tabbed browsing by tortap-0 · · Score: 0

      "It's my opinion that if you feel like you need tabs, there is something wrong with your window manager (or you don't know how to use it right)."

      Who are you to decide what is the correct way to use my windowmanager?

      I love the unix desktop because I can have multiple virtual desktops or work areas. This lets me get away from clutter. You sound like a Windows-person just starting out with KDE. Why would you even cycle through windows? I just place one type of application in one area, browser in one, gimp in the other, mail by it self etc. I almost never cycle through any apps, I just chose work area. Tabs in the browser lets me maximize the browser in its area and use the tabs to navigate between sites, advantage beeing I can see the title of the next page. I usually have two or three browser areas with 4-5 related tabs each.

      This is my favourite quote:

      the tabs are on the opposite end of the screen from where I switch tasks on my WM. This means I have to do a lot of unnecessary mousing around.

      If you use the mouse to navigate I would say you do not know how to quickly and effectively navigate your desktop. Switching work area I do with my keyboard. Then I can switch tabs with the same kayboard. No unnecessary mousing around here. I'm sure there is nothing wrong with your windowmanager, most have keyboard shortcuts, so it must be you who don't know how to use it right :P

    49. Re:Tabbed browsing by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      Give the guy a break! He's already lost 5 somehow!

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    50. Re:Tabbed browsing by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      I generally prefer not to have to switch to the mouse just to close a window, but then again, I browse using keyboard buttons not a scroll wheel.

      It could easily be implemented yes. Learn some GTK+ and get to it. :)

      Opera 6 does this too, but on Opera 5 (latest opera for Linux/PPC) it doesn't. It's annoying as hell to have a bunch of windows/tabs off the screen due to a fixed-width tab size.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    51. Re:Tabbed browsing by pellaeon · · Score: 1

      right-left-right or down-right should do that.

      Look at the galeon manual, section 2.7 for more gestures.

      --
      -- /bin/coffee missing. universe halted.
    52. Re:Tabbed browsing by spudnic · · Score: 2

      I got a MS mouse for the extra buttons and the optical pickup. I've really enjoyed working with it. However, I've noticed recently that the mouse wheel seems to be going. The clicks as you scroll are much softer, and it has a tendency to get stuck mid-catch and scroll uncontrollably.

      I thought I had my mouse problems licked without having a mouse ball mechanism to get all messed up. I guess my hopes of an eternal mouse won't be granted in the near future.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    53. Re:Tabbed browsing by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      Yeah, but you can do this through opening new windows, too. For example, I didn't want to lose my place on the page, so in order to reply to you, I middle-clicked on [Reply to This], which in my Mozilla setup opens a new window. I finish typing this message and close the window using all the neato features of my GUI.

      The advantage of doing it this way is that I have all the advantage of tabs but I can manage all my windows in the same place.

    54. Re:Tabbed browsing by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable. I don't have that problem tho' cuz I moved my taskbars to the top.

      The best part about the tabbed browsing is that you can middle click 5 links, for example, let them download in the background while you are still reading the current page. Then you check them and BAM!! They are already there. GREAT for slashdot.

      The little feature has increased my page-reading bandwith by 3 times at least. =)

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    55. Re:Tabbed browsing by Peaker · · Score: 2

      Its true that creating a hierarchy of windows resolves the problem of 'swamping' the taskbar. However, I do not think that tabs, or "similar program grouping" in the taskbar is the best solution.

      This is actually what desktops are for.
      Just place your browser windows in some desktop[s] and switch to that desktop (And ofcourse, turn off 'show all windows' in the task bar). This has the very important added benefit of being able to group any type of windows (aka: Financial related browser and other program windows in desktop 1, Music related windows in desktop 2, and so on..)

      A perfect WM resolves the need for tabs, but good WM's hardly exist, and people tend to like solutions, even if they're very unoptimal and improper.

    56. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens more often?:
      Switching between apps and websites, or switching view between different websites or opening links in a new window etc.
      I assume the 2nd happens more often, so tabbed browsing is an advantage. use opera, you can control it completly via keyboardshortcuts or even with mouse-gestures

    57. Re:Tabbed browsing by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 2

      My IE blocks pop-ups. With a plug-in, of course. See, if Microsoft added pop-up blocking to IE, they get caught between a rock and a hard place---someone will cry that they are overstepping their monopoly power by driving all the mom-and-pop pop-up blockers into oblivion, and since it's not open source, they might have a case. Mozilla does the same thing, but since it's open source, I think the people have less of a case that "they're trying to drive me out of business!"

      It took me a while, but I found a pop up blocker (PopupPopper) that is free as in beer -- no ads, nada.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    58. Re:Tabbed browsing by pediddle · · Score: 1

      My optical Intellimouse just died on me this week: first it would start randomly turning off (the light turns off and it stops responding), requiring a cold boot of my whole computer to reset it. Then I switched to USB instead of PS/2, and the problem got worse, except I at least didn't have to cold boot (it would come back on after a few seconds). Now, it will flicker once or twice when I try to use it, but for the most part it just turns off and stays off.

      I don't know whether this is indicitave of all Microsoft mice, but I've heard of other people with similar problems. Before this, I'd never had a problem with any Microsoft hardware. Oh well -- too bad it's no longer under warranty.

      I didn't have any problems with my wheel though. Two years and it's still clicking and scrolling away like new. It's too bad for the other problem, because now I've bought a Logitech Dual Optical mouse to replace it, and the wheel just feels, well, squishy. I liked the MS wheel a lot better.

    59. Re:Tabbed browsing by damiam · · Score: 1

      KDE3 debs
      Gnome 2 debs (scroll down a bit)

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    60. Re:Tabbed browsing by Yorrike · · Score: 2
      The great thing about Galeon's tabs, is you can drag a tab out of the Galeon window and it becomes a new instance of Galeon with the tab's respective page loaded. It's fantastic when you're doing research online.

      By the same respect, you can also rearrange the order of your Galeon tabs by dragging them along the tab bar. You can also drag a tab from one Galeon window to another. It's the way it should be.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    61. Re:Tabbed browsing by muzza · · Score: 1

      "What makes this process even more lame is that at least in Mozilla, the tabs are on the opposite end of the screen from where I switch tasks on my WM. This means I have to do a lot of unnecessary mousing around. "

      I never understood why the task bar is positioned at the bottom - every other menu on the system is at the top of the window and pops down, yet the task bar is at the bottom with menu's that pop up? Why? It's completely non-sensical.

      Save yourself all that mousing around and put the task bar at the top where it belongs! (thats what I do)

    62. Re:Tabbed browsing by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      "What makes this process even more lame is that at least in Mozilla, the tabs are on the opposite end of the screen from where I switch tasks on my WM. This means I have to do a lot of unnecessary mousing around. "

      Which is once again why I must emphasize that you should use hotkeys on your keyboard. IceWM, at least, has a nice set of defaults that allow people migrating from OS/2 or Windows to settle in quickly, and avoid "unnecessary mousing around." I just wish it was KDE compliant, because KWin doesn't have the depth of features that allow for the same hotkey behaviour (IE: it's not that the defaults aren't Wincompatible, it's that it doesn't support the same features..).

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    63. Re:Tabbed browsing by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      A much more sensible approach is to open new browser windows rather than tabs, and then do all of your switching using the WM. One of the many advantages of this is that you can use keyboard shortcuts to cycle through all your windows, browser and the rest.

      Well, that's your opinion, and I for one completely hate cycling through dozens of windows along with my email,xterms, and other programs taking up space.

      In an "ideal world"(tm), I should just "think" of the window I want, and microseconds later it should appear magically in front of me. In reality, we can't do that. But with the magical use of Desktops via alt F1,F2,etc. and judicious use of alt-tab, we can grab windows instantly.

      What I do is assign a specific function for my desktops. I.e. desktop 1 is xterm/mp3, desktop 2 is web browser, desktop 3 is xpdf/gv/open office, and desktop 4 is email/news. For each desktop I try not to open more than 2 windows. This lets me swap(not cycle) the windows efficiently, without cycling and scanning back and forth through dozens of windows. This effectively allows me to switch through 8 applications efficiently(without using a mouse), and more if I add desktops or stick in an application or two on desktops that aren't frequently used(and can resort to mouse use).

      Going back to tabbed windows, they help because they keep multiple instances nicely in one "app container", especially in the case of web browsers where I can have anywhere from 3 to 10 windows open at a given time. Also I love kde's konsole as you can also have tabbed xterms and switch between them quite fast(shift+arrow keys). I guess my point with tabbed browsing is they help to keep things organized and my WM uncluttered.

      YMMV though.

    64. Re:Tabbed browsing by tempny · · Score: 1

      that was the most useful thing i've read on ./ all day, procrastinating at work is now that much more efficient

    65. Re:Tabbed browsing by tempny · · Score: 1

      i've had a logitech cordless optical for over a year now, and although it has an annoying habit of turning off randomly (not too often) it's easily fixable by picking it up and hitting it against your desk. Gotta say, any hardware you can fix by hitting it is OK in my book.

    66. Re:Tabbed browsing by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
      Tabbed browsing is, of course, the bomb! I can't use IE anymore because of it.

      Crazy Browser is just the IE dll's wrapped around a suitably beefed up interface. There is tabbed browsing, groups and a pop up killer included to boot. It's very good.

      There is also a commercial version called NetCaptor, which i'm told is slightly better, but it (obviously) costs more.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    67. Re:Tabbed browsing by geschild · · Score: 1

      All the features you are missing and then some with regard to tabs are in multizilla. This is an add-on to mozilla that allows you to switch the tabs to the bottom of the screen and use shortcuts to switch tabs. Combined with mousegestures courtesy of optimoz you can work a lot more effeciently and unclutter your desktop to boot. No going back for me now, I get bitten by trying to use gestures on other peoples PC's way too much. I know my browser is better!

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    68. Re:Tabbed browsing by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Then again, web sites are not applications you usually leave up for a long period of time. It is usually sufficient to seperate, oh, 16 or so sites into 4 categories and just step through them closing each window when you're done. This reduces taskbar clutter by 4x. Plus not all of us have a window manager capable of switching desktops, so these at least would be something useful on, say, Windows or Mac OS. I tend NOT to leave websites up for a long time, but a backlog of 16 pages really clogs up the task bar so there isn't anything intelligable left of the titles.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    69. Re:Tabbed browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh well -- too bad it's no longer under warranty

      Doesn't matter. I've had my Intellimouse Optical for about 2 to 3 years now and i have just this week contacted MS and they are sending a replacement. Try contacting them yourself there's no harm in trying.

      I too brought a Logitech Dual Mouseman Optical to replace my Intellimouse, but i much prefer the Logitech one to the MS one. They're both superior mice, but i think the Logitech is just that little bit better.

    70. Re:Tabbed browsing by horza · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but tabs are a feature I always turn off. I mean, I'm not mad they're there, but I tried using them and didn't like them.

      You tried one of the options, didn't like it, and so left it turned off. I really don't see the problem. Unlike browsers that don't have tabs hence don't give you the option.

      The basic problem with tabs is that they force you to switch windows at two totally different places on your desktop.

      You aren't forced to do anything. You can open a new tab _or_ a new window.

      I imagine that I am fairly typical in that I have several browser pages up at any one time, and in addition to that, I have some other apps open (music player, IRC, news program, file manager, etc). The reason I have all that stuff open is because I switch between them, and I want to do this efficiently.

      When you get used to tabbed browsing, you can have email, news, etc as well as a few browser windows open each containing a dozen grouped urls (eg a dozen programs you found on Freshmeat and want to flick back and forth comparing at leisure). Having 20-30 separate browser windows as well as trying to find you text editor window is a real pain.

      A much more sensible approach is to open new browser windows rather than tabs, and then do all of your switching using the WM. One of the many advantages of this is that you can use keyboard shortcuts to cycle through all your windows, browser and the rest.

      In your opinion, not in mine though for two reasons: first is that a lot of us click on the title bar of a window to bring it to the front hence the less title bars the better, and the second is that I don't want to have to go through every application I'm running to switch back and forth between two browser windows.

      I suspect that tabs are a gimmick that will be requested only by a tiny but vocal minority.

      That doesn't tally with a straw poll of the people I know.

      It's my opinion that if you feel like you need tabs, there is something wrong with your window manager (or you don't know how to use it right).

      First you complain you don't find tabbed browsing intuitive enough, then you accuse all of us using tabbed browsing that we are ignorant and should learn our window manager. Do you not find that contradictory?

      Phillip.

    71. Re:Tabbed browsing by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Dopefish_1, eres un chingón!!!

      We (who didnt know the "middle-click on tab to close it) owe you big time!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    72. Re:Tabbed browsing by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2

      but the mutiple windows open up along the bottom, that's a pain in the ass.

      -YG

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    73. Re:Tabbed browsing by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
      Maybe I was too subtle.

      The gestures *I* make at Konqueror and KDE in general are often considered rude, and can ellicit a "punching" response out of most people.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  5. Aaargh! by dcardamo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I just finished installing 3.03 with gentoo! Took all night and I have to start all over :)

    1. Re:Aaargh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beginning to think that these sort of comments are the reincarnation of our now-dying Beowulf brethren.

    2. Re:Aaargh! by Lazar+Dobrescu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these sort of comments!

    3. Re:Aaargh! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should try out these new-fangled pre-compiled binaries. You see, somebody with a faster computer then you compiles the program before you download it so that everybody that wants the software doesn't have to waste time doing what only really needs to be done once.

      Having the ability to build a program yourself is nice, and comes in handy occationally, but if you compile everything yourself you're just wasting cycles.

    4. Re:Aaargh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah right, gentoo baby.

      everything compiled specifically for my machine with my USE flags, my architecture and the libraries i have installed.

      how is using cycles that would go unused wasting them?

      your cpu is at %100 when using lynx etc?

    5. Re:Aaargh! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Its not the installing that takes time, its the downloading...at least for dialup users.

      While I suppose I could download my cycles to charity, I choose to sqander them recklessly on optimizing my system. I'm a horrible person aren't I? I must be wasting tens of ones of dollars worth of cycles that could have been used on something else.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:Aaargh! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Its not the installing that takes time, its the downloading...at least for dialup users.


      I realize that my comment was quite flamesque...

      You built X, right? I'm sure that took orders of magnitude longer to build then it did to download.

      While I suppose I could download my cycles to charity, I choose to sqander them recklessly on optimizing my system. I'm a horrible person aren't I? I must be wasting tens of ones of dollars worth of cycles that could have been used on something else.

      Donating cycles and wasting power are just stupid. I thought that perhaps you might want to spend some time actually using your machine. You know, like doing work or something. If you've built your entire software base from source, I can't amagine that you didn't waste at least a whole day doing it. What did you actually "tune" anyway? How much of your software did you build with non standard options? Compiler optimizations? You can get binary distribution of those too. If you claim that you really do this for some productivity benifit you're either lying, or grossly uninformed. If you do it for fun, then more power to you, but why are you complaining on slashdot about how long it took?

      Then again, who am I to talk? I'm wasting time posting this stupid comment instead of working...

    7. Re:Aaargh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X actually doesn't take that long on my Athlon 800 to build (which is relativly old compared to what the kids in the hood have now).

    8. Re:Aaargh! by static55 · · Score: 1

      you get more control over your apps when you compile stuff from scratch.. for example, i like to fix the crappy colors in the kicker pager applet so that it blends in with kicker instead of sticking out like a sore thumb.. and if you use gentoo's portage it's even more idiot-proof than using the rpm command from the command-line.. the delay waiting for the code to compile is only a problem if you're really impatient or if you're computer is so slow that compiling stuff drags it down and renders it totally useless for any other task..

    9. Re:Aaargh! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      you get more control over your apps when you compile stuff from scratch..

      I agree, but what percentage of your stuff did you actually configure differently from the default? I don't use an rpm based distribution, so I don't know how hard it is there, but with Debian I can install all the basic stuff from binaries, and then the few programs that I want to change the options for I can 'apt-get source', change the options and build the package. With all the development tools and libraries I have on my system, I don't even want to thing about how long it would take me to compile everything. Especially if I had to recompile each time I upgraded.

      Anyway, like I said. I don't care it you want to assemble your software by hand, but if it's going to piss you off so much that you're going to complain about it on slashdot, then why are you doing it? (My guess it that the original poster just wanted to tell everybody how 'leet he was for using gentoo.)

  6. okay... by Zen · · Score: 1

    so what's tabbed browsing?

    1. Re:okay... by JHelgie · · Score: 1

      You can have multiple web pages open at once in the browser, there are tabs on the screen that you can use to switch between them, so you dont need to have tons of browsers open at once.

    2. Re:okay... by LunarOne · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well, you know what tabs are (eg. right click on "My Computer" on Windows and the tabs at the top are General, Device Manager, Hardware Profiles, Performance).

      Well, in Mozilla, you can set it up so that you can:
      a) right-click on a link and instead of open the page in another window, you can open it in another tab.
      b) middle click on a link and it will open up the additional page in a tab.
      c) type a url in the address bar and instead of pressing ENTER, press CTRL-ENTER and the page will be opened in a tab.


      Thus, you have one copy of Mozilla running, but within the browser, a tab for each page that you want to view. No more billions of sessions open in the task bar at the bottom of your UI.

      Best of all, you can set your preferences so that Mozilla loads the tabs in the background. A great application of this is: open the Slashdot page. Middle-click on all the "Read more..." links of stories you are interested in. You will have, within your browser, tabs with headings that you can look at, one at a time. Then, you can read each story, close the tab and look at the next and so on.

      If you haven't or won't use this feature, force yourself to. You'll never go back.

      --

      Read my sig if you like, but I'll never see yours, thanks to Discussions, Viewing, Disable sigs...
    3. Re:okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA U R FUNNE!!

    4. Re:okay... by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Still using netscape 4.77?

    5. Re:okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the biggest advantage of tabbed browsing is that it cuts down on waiting for a page to render. You can click a link, keep reading and when you are ready you can go to that link and it will be there waiting on you. This is especially helpful if you are looking at a half dozen screenshots. You can open them up, in succession, in their own tab. By the time you've opened the last screenshot, the first one is finished rendering. There are other benefits. But, that's my favorite.

      I know how to use my WM. But, nothing in a WM can replace the efficiency of that.

  7. KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One has to wonder if it is decent or even moral to use KDE these days. Since the 11th of September, we as Americans have had an opportunity to examine ourselves and our core values, and the question must be asked: does KDE fit into these core values, and is it something that ought to be a part of our day-to-day lives as we come to grips with the new reality that has been thrust upon us?

    One thing must be understood: KDE is virtually 100% foreign technology. The foundation of KDE is the Qt toolkit, a set of GUI widgets developed by TrollTech, a Norwegian company. Norway, like the rest of Scandanavia and Europe in general, is an extremely socialist country. Socialism is something that Americans decided long ago would not be allowed in our nation, and yet millions of Linux users are downloading it without so much as a second thought. Beyond that, Norway's liberal immigration laws have allowed all sorts of unsavory characters into their nation... including the Muslims with which we are currently at war.

    The rest of the KDE intrinsics are developed by primarily European agitators, folks who would not bat an eyelash at knocking down the capitalist foundation upon which our nation has been built. Bashing Microsoft is a popular sport in this forum, but the truth must be told: MSFT is an American company that employs American citizens with American families. Joke all you want about Microsoft employees, but they need to eat just like the rest of us do. For the life of me, I cannot understand why one would eschew Microsoft products in favor of things such as KDE.

    Now, MSFT products are not perfect, but the last time I checked, neither was KDE! So in a very real sense, we are talking about choosing the lesser of two evils, and in this case the choice could not be clearer (at least, in the opinion of this patriot.) Using KDE doesn't help this country one bit, but purchasing dutifully from Microsoft helps to ensure our economic vitality (and, by extension, our nation, our military, and our way of life.)

    I doubt that Osama bin Laden owns a PC, but if he did, he'd probably be running KDE. Does this make you comfortable? It shouldn't.

    1. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The thing I love about 'patriots' is how incredibly good they are at failing to recognize what helps and what does not help their cause. It's hilarious .. cute, almost.

    2. Re:KDE and the new America by jonabbey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The thing I love about anonymous cowards is how incredibly good they are at failing to recognize irony, subtlety, and wit. It's hilarious .. cute, almost.

    3. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that Osama bin Laden owns pants, Does this make you comfortable? It shouldn't.

    4. Re:KDE and the new America by SirSlud · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Don't forget how good we are at escaping any chance of having to own up to how susceptible to trolls we are! Thats the magic skill.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    5. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like to be unconstructive, but:

      That was without doubt the most depressingly stupid post I have ever read on Slashdot.

    6. Re:KDE and the new America by Veldcath · · Score: 1

      The thing I love about people who discuss Socalism and Communism is how they ignore that Norway is a Constitutional Monarchy (you know, like the UK?) with a Market Socialist (actually, Wellfare Capitalist) econmy and the USSR was an OLIGARCHY with a Communist economy.

      --


      ... "I read part of it all the way through." -- Movie Mogul Sam Goldwyn (and some slashdot readers)
    7. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come off it; we've had socialism in the USA ever since FDR and the New Deal. Or haven't you noticed a good chunk of your salary being taken from you to support Socialist Insecurity?

    8. Re:KDE and the new America by FrozedSolid · · Score: 1

      Democracy is usually categorized by the "Invisible Hand." The idea that government intervention is completely unnesessary and that the consumers will choose the greatest product themselves. One step down (or up, depending on your view) from that would be socialism, things like child labor laws, minimum wage, anti-monopoly laws, things that really do help people, all socialist ideas.

      When we were truly capitalist?
      Actually...at one point in the past, we probably were, until they made it illegal to sell your children for slave labor...

      Just a thought.

      --
      When all freedom is outlawed only the outlaws have freedom
    9. Re:KDE and the new America by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Also, Jiang Zemin has been quoted as saying that the US is the closest nation to achieving Marx's ideal: worker ownership and control of industry.

    10. Re:KDE and the new America by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Now you see, this is why we shouldn't have AC posting here. Because without previous context, I simply cannot tell if this is scarily serious or slyly satirical.

      It could - really - have been written with either intent. I really hope that it's satire, because if so, it's one of the best pieces of insightful, knife edge balanced thought provoking pieces that I've ever read, and I (tentatively) applaud it.

      But if it's serious, and more, if it's widely interpreted as such and applauded for that - well, god help us all.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:KDE and the new America by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

      Norwegians are oil-fed brats, much like Saudis.

    12. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the stupidest thing I've ever read in an anti-open software tirade! First of all, as far as immigration policies go, like America is one to talk! Our immigration is far more open than any of the European countries.. We import millions of people into this country every year--EVEN in bad economy--and EVEN with no labor shortage to justify it... AND WE IMPORT FAR MORE MUSLIMS THAN NORWAY!! I think you should check into the facts.. Try the immigration act of 1983.. which virtually threw all the doors wide open.. The fact is, the planes that flew into the trade center and the Pentagon on 911 took off from American airports, not from Norwegian ones, so get a frickin clue ok?

      Lastly, this "Open source software is computing communism" argument is old hat.. Straight Microsoft corporate propaganda.. If open source development was communist, then the government would be running it, and no private corporations would be benefiting from it. I think a serious look will show that is not the case.

    13. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it strikes me funny that there are still a lot of people who think that america is a world upon itself. they know so little about the rest of the world and make postings as if they do.

      this is the internet, where finally the world has found a place to be one, without baoundaries. ... and now you're clamoring for artificial ones?

      be not self-centered, man.

    14. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, that was beyond obvious satire. It wouldn't have even been acceptable as a troll, because the jabs against microsoft were too obviously thrown in there to rile up the slashdot audience.

    15. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WE IMPORT FAR MORE MUSLIMS THAN NORWAY!!

      And that's just disgraceful. Why should we import them instead of making them ourselves? I say it's un-american to get an imported Muslim. Be patriotic! Buy domestic Muslims!

    16. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you have any clue what the word "democracy" means... you may want to look it up in a dictionary before you make an ass out of yourself in public again. It has nothing whatsoever to do with capitalism, although it is usually synonymous since capitalist countries are generally more civilized in other ways as well.

      Anyway if you are too lazy to leave your computer to get one you can always go to www.m-w.com.

      Just a thought.

    17. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It strikes me as funny that there are still a lot of people who are too fucking stupid to know that something this blatant is obviously a troll. On the other hand, given the subject of your comment you are probably european, so I understand your inability to think critically. Although after being nearly conquered by assholes a half dozen times in the past 200 years I would think you would lose some of your naivette...

      One day you're going to fuck up and the U.S. is going to say "nah, we're busy, go save yourselves". Then you'll understand how self-righteously foolish your regionalistic bluster truly is.

    18. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the US doesn't shout out "LOOK AT US, WE'RE SOCIALIST!" doesn't mean that the government doesn't follow some Socialist ideas. FDR's many plans to bring people out of poverty and create government funded jobs were leaning towards Socialism, but I bet you wouldn't dare call the president who led out country through the great depression and World War II unpatriotic.

      Besides, KDE is just a tool. Bin Laden uses the internet, so should we as good Americans just quit our ISPs are get offline?

    19. Re:KDE and the new America by Veldcath · · Score: 1

      Actually, they eat little boiled potato balls and rotten-smelling fish... not oil. Oh, and pork-n-potato sausages with no spices in them at all.

      --


      ... "I read part of it all the way through." -- Movie Mogul Sam Goldwyn (and some slashdot readers)
    20. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC comment about KDE:

      Post-9/11...check
      Globalism...check

      Katz?

    21. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previus context doesn't always help. Like even with your extensive posting history I have trouble telling if you are a retard or a crackhead.

    22. Re:KDE and the new America by Zeeto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      - Stupid - Racist - Moronic - *Very* Ignorant... Have you completed at least the Primary School?

    23. Re:KDE and the new America by mobosplash · · Score: 1
      ...MSFT is an American company that employs American citizens with American families.
      ... but purchasing dutifully from Microsoft helps to ensure our economic vitality (and, by extension, our nation, our military, and our way of life.)

      I've heard things like this spoken seriously during the anti-trust trial and found it really odd. The economy doesn't need a super Microsoft. If Microsoft only sold 1/3 of the products it does now other companies would pick up the difference. Monopolies exploit efficiencies, they don't generate more jobs. How many people were hired as a result of the Compaq/HP merger?

    24. Re:KDE and the new America by FrozedSolid · · Score: 1

      you're completely right, my bad. I meant Capitalism to begin with.

      Although Democracy & Capitalism walk hand in hand.

      --
      When all freedom is outlawed only the outlaws have freedom
    25. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people were hired as a result of the Compaq/HP merger?


      err, none
      in fact, they continued the layoffs that compaq had started earlier in the year...
      good try though

    26. Re:KDE and the new America by hackus · · Score: 2

      MSFT is indeed an American company, and it does employ people.

      In fact I would estimate, judging from the court cases, that for every one MSFT employee, MSFT has excercised and destroyed about 100 peoples jobs in this country through the illegal use of its monopoly power.

      Those 100 people no doubt had families as well.

      What about THOSE PEOPLE?

      Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    27. Re:KDE and the new America by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Single reply to the 4 AC replies and two moderators that completely missed the point of my post.

      Are comprehension skills dropping sharply here? Note that I worried that this piece might not be satire. I didn't say that it wasn't, but it could be serious. People do think like this. Just because you don't doesn't mean nobody does.

      Note further that I interpreted this as satire, but I worried that others might not. And, gosh, fifteen respondants treated this as a serious piece, which rather makes my fucking point .

      Perhaps you could bear that in mind the next time that you find a piece of speculation challenging your cosy anonymous assumption that everybody thinks exactly like you and that there are no morons in the world.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    28. Re:KDE and the new America by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      And that funny brown cheese that they eat at breakfast. Very nice, tastes a little like toffee, but a little strange nonetheless

    29. Re:KDE and the new America by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      Socialism is something that Americans decided long ago would not be allowed in our nation

      Are you aware that the US government (federal, state, and local combined) takes almost 50% of the average citizen's earnings per year? This is a far cry from the founders' original vision of a free market economy based on individual liberty and voluntary association.

      Nope, the US today is just as socialist as most of Europe.

    30. Re:KDE and the new America by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      'Destroying 100's of jobs' is never a particulary good way of putting a point across.

      "People who sell diggers are evil, since you need a lot less people to operate diggers than spades, thus destroying 100's of jobs in this country"

      And so on...

    31. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although Democracy & Capitalism walk hand in hand.

      Maybe, but democracy and capitalism certainly don't necessarily.

    32. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice =)..
      But 1 thing.. Linux was of course originally created in Finland by Mr. Linus (Finnish of course..). And Finland being located in northern Europe (and sharing some border with Norway).
      So you are then trusting your whole system in "commie" tech.. =) U being had boy..

    33. Re:KDE and the new America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disabling anonymous posting wont make the morons smart. If some loser who still fears communists and thinks Linux is evil, well, fuck him.

    34. Re:KDE and the new America by intermodal · · Score: 1

      i sure hope you weren't serious, cause that was friggin' funny. and on to my reason for posting this: IIRC the Al Quaeda computer we captured early on was running some variant of NT (win2k IIRC), not Linux/BSD running KDE.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  8. Tabbed Browsing by LordYUK · · Score: 0, Troll

    Once an avid IE user (I've hated netscape since I think it was called "gold" edition), I tried Mozilla due to its Tabbed Browsing, which for anyone who DOESNT know (I didnt until I used it) is that you can open links in the same window, but they are in different tabs, like a notebook is divided into sections using... wait for it... tabs. this means that when you're flipping between multiple pages, you dont have to have umpteen windows open. Now, this has nothing to do with KDE 3.1 or whatever, but tabbed browsing is wonderful, and those of you who havent used it, should try out Mozilla.

    and I am a staunch (ducks) Windows (covers head) XP professional user, so its not like I switched because of a hatred for M$ (note, I play lots of games, so Windows works better for me)

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  9. tabbed browsing. by garcia · · Score: 3, Funny

    how could you not like it? Instead of having to open 5 different windows of Mozilla I have just one and easy access to each (I use E and don't have the option of a taskbar or icons).

    I can have Slashdot open, my banking open, and porn (three different ones usually).

    Also probably conserves on my short memory usage ;)

    1. Re:tabbed browsing. by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2

      I'm a web developer and need to get to refernce sites, my terminal, and a testing window. So I'm not always in a browser window and like to access things from the taskbar directly. Which is why I don't use tabs. But to avoid making a mess I much prefer KDE's (it's also in Widnows XP now) taskbar groups.

    2. Re:tabbed browsing. by PeteyG · · Score: 1

      how could you not like it? Instead of having to open 5 different windows of Mozilla I have just one and easy access to each (I use E and don't have the option of a taskbar or icons).

      If you're using Enlightenment, then you can use the Icon Box as a taskbar analogue... it can store your 'iconified' (minimized) windows, even allowing you to have a 'snapshot' picture to represent it! I stretch my iconbox along the bottom of my screen, so It's just like a taskbar.

      I also, however, find tabbed browsing to be a gift from the gods. Even in E. No more giant jumbles of open browser windows! The jumble is now quite moderate, and it's all in one easy-to-access window.

      --
      no thanks
    3. Re:tabbed browsing. by irish_spic · · Score: 1

      > Also probably conserves on my short memory usage ;)

      maybe if you did not look at so much porn your memory and recolection of events would be much better (or was it vision that my mom was worried about? can't remember)

      but KDE is still a pig. Why does it take so long to start up?
      yeah, yeah... enough with the upgrade advise...

      --
      A truth that's told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent. -- William Blake
    4. Re:tabbed browsing. by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 1

      Gnome has it too...

      --
      wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
    5. Re:tabbed browsing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it! You shouldn't point out that the only thing that GNOME lacks over KDE is PR (thanks to Taco and pals). In fact, most of the things that people squeals orgasmically over in KDE are available in GNOME and have been for a long time.

    6. Re:tabbed browsing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and nobody cares

    7. Re:tabbed browsing. by Meleneth · · Score: 1

      only 3? ;) check out rox, it makes it easier to fill your screen with porn by giving you a lightweight explorer-esque file browser interface. It has one-click launching, so once you tell it to start mplayer for all those video files, you're just a few short clicks from naked bodies all over your screen :)

      Not that I would know anything about that kind of thing.

      --
      remote access CLI with tools is the only friend you'll ever need.
  10. Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is KDE still using objprelink?

  11. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the answer to both of your questions is YES

  12. I don't get it... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've only used Linux via the GUI for a few months (ya, ya I know...)... but why is there KDE and Gnome? Why are the two not one. The only differences I see between the two are skins, very minor UI functionality, and some utils that are unique to either or. But why can't KDE and Gnome be merged, and allow the end user to customize everything the way they want? And use the utilities they want. I like KDE's appearence, but I hate it's 'feel' when actually doing tasks.

    What is so fundamentally different between Gnome and KDE that doesn't allow them to be merged into one project? IMHO that's all that is required to finally get a solid Desktop presence for linux.

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:I don't get it... by glwtta · · Score: 2
      well they are based on completely different architectures, not to mention the underlying libraries (GTK and Qt), "merging" them (even if the developer teams wanted to) would probably be no less work than creating a new environment from scratch.

      and in any case, why should there be only one? (unless they start playing a theme song by Queen on startup, or something)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What is so fundamentally different between Gnome and KDE that doesn't allow them to be merged into one project?"

      just about everything, in terms of archetecture. They are only the "same" in that they have the same broad goals, more or less (be a friendly desktop environment, incorporate more featurful/integrated libraries then *nix gui's usually have, etc). However, the way that they both are constructed is quite different, an not very compatable.

    3. Re:I don't get it... by Sheeplet · · Score: 1

      Dont' forget the fact that Gnome is all in C and KDE is all in C++. The architecture difference alone is amazing.

      --
      -- Breaking Windows: Not just for kids anymore KDE
    4. Re:I don't get it... by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      Sure, just go tell all of the KDE or GNOME volunteer programmers that you have decided it would be better if they code something completely different, rather than the thing they actually like coding.

      As long as these projects are dominated by developers who do it for fun, it's going to be near-impossible for external voices to sway their development. That's as it should be, IMHO.

      To the extent that GNOME is becoming a corporate project, you may see attempts to "standardize" on GNOME like you're asking for...I for one hope it doesn't happen (but witness Redhat's reskinning of KDE to look like GNOME in their latest beta...)

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    5. Re:I don't get it... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've only used Linux via the GUI for a few months (ya, ya I know...)... but why is there KDE and Gnome? Why are the two not one. The only differences I see between the two are skins, very minor UI functionality, and some utils that are unique to either or. But why can't KDE and Gnome be merged, and allow the end user to customize everything the way they want? And use the utilities they want. I like KDE's appearence, but I hate it's 'feel' when actually doing tasks.

      Well, this is understandable. It's a phase we all go through, so don't worry. I went through it for instance, after a month or two of using Linux. It takes time, but you will realise the reasons for this. To try and save you time however, here is why, in a nutshell:

      In the beginning there was KDE. It was free software (the GPL definition), but it was linked agianst Qt which was non free. This caused a lot of strife the community, as not only was KDE (in theory) illegal to distribute as it broke the terms of the GPL, but also the KDE developers were seen as being unreponsive to the issue. This was an important issue to many, as it would have "polluted" the platform with a core non free component. Why does this matter you say? Just imagine what would have happened if TrollTech had gone bust, or been bought out? One day Qt is there, the next it's not and you're shafted. Actually, project Harmony was set up to clone Qt (iirc), but after some considerable pressure from the community TrollTech GPL'd Qt, and all was well.

      In the meantime, Miguel de Icaza had set up the GNOME project. It was based on GTK which was LGPL'd all the way. They also made many different design decisions - for instance GNOME is written in C, whereas KDE is C++. This is more important than it may seem, as (it was claimed) C is easier to bind to other languages, so gnome would be more inclusive. They also based their object model on CORBA rather than C++ for instance. There are many differences.

      Today, they are so different there is no hope of merging them, so forget that. They do work together though, check out freestandards.org - the standards they produce there are often better than either of the technologies the individual projects came up with. KDE and GNOME used to be completely incompatible. Today, even the dreaded clipboard problem has been solved. So they do work together, and I for one am very interested in seeing this extended to sharing code as well. We'll have to see if this is possible.

      Don't see this as a bad thing, please. Yes there is duplication of effort, sometimes needless. But consider the real world. There is lots of competition in the real world. Lots of different companies compete to provide the same product, but usually in different ways. The competition between KDE and GNOME keeps them sharp.

      Do people use GNOME? YES! I just jumped ship from KDE3 to GNOME2.0.1 built from Garnome. I love it to bits, before I hated GTKs flakeyness and uglyness. Now I can't get enough of it. It's beautiful. GNOME2 has had a lot of effort put into usability, and it shows. It's not perfect yet, and there are still missing bits, but I think I'm a convert. Up until now, KDE has been the clear leader really. You said you don't like the "feel" of KDE: well, I know what you mean. To me, GNOME2 just feels better, although it seriously lacks features at the moment. It depends on personal preference though. One friend of mine swears by Enlightenment.

      Competition is natural, and good. In the real world, people disagree over how things should be done. As long as competition is bracketed by standards, we will move forward, and this is what's happening.

      What is so fundamentally different between Gnome and KDE that doesn't allow them to be merged into one project? IMHO that's all that is required to finally get a solid Desktop presence for linux.

      LOL, don't worry, we all have opinions when we move to Linux. We learn later most of those opinions are misinformed ;) Remember - not everything is what it seems. Linux will have a solid desktop presence, but not yet. It's not ready. Both KDE and GNOME need a lot of polish and work, but they are good foundations on which to build. Remember: not everything is what it seems.

    6. Re:I don't get it... by Arandir · · Score: 2

      but why is there KDE and Gnome? Why are the two not one.

      Because freedom is choice and the control over your own destiny. Open Source and Free Software is not about monolithic environments that you must use. It's not about some elite group deciding what is best for you.

      This freedom allows you to choose between KDE, GNOME, XFCE, Windowmaker, Enightenment, Blackbox or whatever. It allows you to choose between Redhat, SuSE, Gentoo, Manduck or Slackware. It allows you to choose between Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD. Choose between Emacs, XEmacs, Vim, nvi, elvis, joe, jed, kwrite, kate, gedit and dozens more.

      What is so fundamentally different between Gnome and KDE that doesn't allow them to be merged into one project?

      1) Politics. GNOME is Free Software and KDE is Open Source. Personally, I can't tell the difference between the two, but independent experimentation has shown that if you put a hardcore FSF/GNU person in the same room as an Open Source advocate, you can actually warp the curvature of time/space. And besides, GNOME is a GNU project and KDE is not, and for some people that makes all the difference in the world.

      2) Language. GNOME is C and KDE is C++. Both have bindings to other languages, but for all practical purposes, one is C and the other C++.

      3) Toolkits. First off, you have Qt versus GTK+. Until you can merge these two into one toolkit, you will never be able to merge KDE and GNOME. Both have different APIs, different OO paradigms, and different scopes.

      IMHO that's all that is required to finally get a solid Desktop presence for linux.

      If it is required for Linux to have a monolithic core of elites deciding what software must be used, before it can get on the desktop, then perhaps the desktop is not the right goal.

      But no matter to me, since I use FreeBSD instead of Linux. There's choice for you!

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    7. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heretic!!!

    8. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I cannot believe this incredibly wrong post has been uncommented.


      1) Politics. GNOME is Free Software and KDE is Open Source.

      Wrong KDE is perfectly free software. It is party GPL and BSDish some artistic. As free as it can get.


      then perhaps the desktop is not the right goal.


      You completely lack the understanding of it all, exactly like your predecessor. There is no goal! This is free software developed be people like me. I do what I I like, just for fun. I do not follow anybody and I have no goal. In contrary to the majority of bigmouthed, non-programming /.-posters, most developers give a rats ass about linux's success on the desktop or anywhere else. I like it if people use my stuff, but I don'r care if I have 1% 10% or 100% market share.
  13. Has anyone got the SuSE Binaries to Work by alistair · · Score: 2

    The site provides RPMs for Suse, they can be downloaded from

    http://download.at.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/kde-3. 1-beta1/SuSE/i386/8.0/

    However, when I check the RPMs I get

    error: failed dependencies:
    libkviewsupport.so.0 is needed by kdegraphics3-3.0.7-0


    Any ideas where kdegraphics3-3.0.7-0 can be found, rpmfind didn't turn up anything useful. I am using SuSE 8 with a full install of KDE3.03, but this has been updated many times since its initial install as SuSE 7.0.

    I did get some components working. The panel is much improved, and support for dual head displays looks much better (the panel can now be configured on a per display basis). However, I couln't convince Konq to display any web page, in tabs or otherwise :-(.

    1. Re:Has anyone got the SuSE Binaries to Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same problem as you. KDE 3.1 beta also asks for qt3-3.0.5 and SUSE 8.0 ships with qt3-3.0.3.
      When I force the installs most KDE apps crash...
      What's the solution?

      Thanks for your help
      Laci

    2. Re:Has anyone got the SuSE Binaries to Work by alistair · · Score: 2

      I found this one, qt3-3.0.5 can be found in KDE 3.03 which is available from SuSE's main website under the KDE update service.

      I did eventually get some of KDE 3.1 Beta One to work, but don't consider the effect on stability to be worth the upgrade, certainly not for my main PC, so if you do consider it keep the 3.03 packages around, after playing with the beta for a bit you should be able to reinstall all of these and have your system back as stable as before (note, this may just be my machine, other people I know are using the beta without any crashes at all so far, I just like having a guarenteed 28+ day uptime on my window manager).

  14. The link is messed up... by gsfprez · · Score: 2

    the link in the story is mistakenly going to Apple's website

    i mean, only Apple users would want to slow down their system with drop shadows, lickable buttons, translucent drop-down menus? I just want to get work done.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    1. Re:The link is messed up... by peg0cjs · · Score: 2, Funny

      i mean, only Apple users would want to slow down their system with drop shadows, lickable buttons, translucent drop-down menus? I just want to get work done.

      Lickable buttons? Wow! Does that mean we need to get touch-screens now, too? I hope I don't get a <ZOT!>

      --
      Karma: Excellent (Mainly due to Bill & Ted's Karma Adventure)
    2. Re:The link is messed up... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      Lickable buttons? Wow! Does that mean we need to get touch-screens now, too?

      Nah, it's just a bug. See, somebody accidentally entered a bunch of stuff as "_Candy" that should have read "Eye_Candy"...And since nobody told those crazy developers that there was no way to code an "XFlavor" interface, they went and did it anyway...

      I expect they'll correct it back to "Eye_Candy" in Beta2, which is just as well, because all of the yellow buttons are banana flavored, and I hate banana, and the dog keeps leaving nasty dog-slobber marks all over my screen....

    3. Re:The link is messed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lickable buttons? jesus suffering fuck

  15. Correction by alistair · · Score: 2

    Sorry, that should have read, any idea where libkviewsupport.so.0 can be found, kdegraphics3-3.0.7-0 is the base package.

    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are installing in the right order, right? arts first, then kdelibs, then whatever you want, then kdeaddons last.

  16. Emace or VI or.... Kate? by zulux · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Kate has been a god send 'round here - Programmers who are just starting out the *NIX way need a editor that behaves kinda-like Windows notepad or other Windows IDE editors, but has cool features, and Kate fits the bill. The code folding works well and the whole package is just a joy to use.

    Eventually they all should move to Emacs or VI for better productivity, but for the small, insignificant, time it takes to learn Kate, it's suprisingly productive.

    Perhaps Kate will evolve to add the features of Emace, but I hope those features are 'hidden' and don't destroy the easy to learn interface of the curent Kate.

    Bit-o-somthing: All out instances of Kate run on one BSD box and are viewed on Windows destops via VNC. It's the same soluton that we use for our clients that want to keep their Windows but use out *NIX apps that we make for them. It makes us both happy; they get to keep Windows Solitare and viruses, and out app is safly running on a real operating system.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      VIM can easily be configured as a KPart component and used in almost all KDE programs. take a look at KVim. Vi rocks period.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by Pengo · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Being a little bored with VIM I am trying a few different editors and have had some suprising results. Most of my code I write is Java/Python/VelocityMacro/JSP. For me JEdit has been a godsend as I have found that I can do almost everything in there that I need (sorta sick like emacs) but I have a very elegent and easy to use editor with outstanding tools like a built in jpython, code insight, and class browsing.

      There is even a plugin that allows basic VI emulation (command mode) which excites the hell out of me. The syntax highlighting seems a bit more complete than VIM's (it just works better, especially in tricky JSP pages).

      Kate was an editor that I tried for a day or two, but with a VERY small syntax-highlighting pallete it's hard to be as productive as I am in VIM or JEdit.

      Note, for java people.. JEdit is a nice lite alternative to something like NetBeans or JBuilder. It's probably not the best thing for those weak of heart though, plugins can be touchy and a little fickle to get working. If your comfortable with an Emacs level of configurability, you might like it. (Note, this is comming from a non-emacs user).

      Cheers

    3. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try NEdit. It's a windows/mac-like editor that is more powerful than any editors I've used on either windows or mac. -- jason

    4. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      why an alternative to jbuilder? You can d/l it and use it for free (unless you are building a commercial product).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    5. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, and editor that cannot run a fkin make in the working directory should never be called "powerful".

    6. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

      i'll bite. vi is a great editor, but the only problem is that the commands are difficult to remember and there is little alternative. same with emacs with no menus, etc.

      however, both vim and emacs seem to have no problem with menus and all the fancy gui options. what does kate offer that is better than these gui options (and does it have a good command set for adv. users?)

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    7. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2

      It surprised me a bit when I realised this is the first time I've even heard kate mentioned. Before going to Linux I primarily used ultraedit for working on anything with little to no gui. I was quite happy to find something similar in layout, even if more lightweight already installed when I decided to give Linux a try.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    8. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by Pengo · · Score: 2


      I just found it to crash more frequently than I would like. I don't know if it's my version of java on linux that I am using, the version or my code inside. I used jbuilder for 2 years until I just got tired of the problems and bugs.

    9. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Try the newer version.
      I'm sure I remember it comming up in the discussion about the new release, and someone replying it is pretty stable now.

      They did have a problem from having a bad reputation from the first versions, although I think that was from speed.

    10. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I wish I could find an editor I could do literacy programming in - emacs had some support, but it wasn't very good.

      If you don't know what literacy programming, go find out about it :) Invented (?) by knuth - 'nuff said.

    11. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by Devil's+Avocado · · Score: 1

      """
      Programmers who are just starting out the *NIX way need a editor that behaves kinda-like Windows notepad or other Windows IDE editors, but has cool features, and Kate fits the bill.
      """
      Check out NEdit. It's a windows-like editor that's very mature and well-designed.

      www.nedit.org

      -DA

    12. Re:Emace or VI or.... Kate? by zulux · · Score: 2

      Sorry for the delay in responding..

      Kate doesen't offer anyhthing to advanced users - people who are use to Vi or Emacs, but, and it's a big but, it is wonderfull for people just getting used to programming on a Unix box that are coming from a Windows world. Kate is really just an avanced Notepad - it's not terribly productive, just easy to learn.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Geez 3.1 beta is out by 2000+Britneys · · Score: 1

    what's next Mandrake 9.0 PR1? where does the insanity end. I just installed MDK 9.0 beta 1 and they have beta 3 on the servers now. KDE 3.1 ? I haven't tested the vs. 3.0x yet !!! gota go out (arrg the sun is bad for my CRT burnt skin) and get me some more cdrs. Thank gawd they are cheep. But seriously why do we need newer and newer versions of the same software every 2, 3 months? Can't they just provide seervice packs or something to upgrade the software?

    1. Re:Geez 3.1 beta is out by jascat · · Score: 1

      That's why you get a distribution where you can upgrade/update more easily via net (ex. Debian w/ apt or Gentoo with portage). I haven't burned a full cd install of linux in a looong time. DG

    2. Re:Geez 3.1 beta is out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is forcing you to upgrade! better yet, its beta, so KDE is only requesting you to try it and report back the encountered errors.

      stick to your pretty recent version if you don't have the time to install and test.

      You want to be bleeding edge all the time? Gentoo is the way.
      You want easy upgrading? Debian is the way

      On the other hand. I'm getting tired of downloading 50 meg files, with only minute differenences in them compared to the previous version.

      gotta check out cvs on day. .flake.

    3. Re:Geez 3.1 beta is out by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      [-1, Obvious]

      Of course, you don't have to upgrade...just ignore beta announcements, and your upgrade cycle will suddenly become much more manageable. :)

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    4. Re:Geez 3.1 beta is out by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Heck, you can do it with Mandrake. Just do urpmi.addmedia -h cooker ftp://your/favorite/cooker/mirror to add Cooker to your update sources. Now, do urpmi --auto-select to upgrade everything except the kernel. You'll need to urpmi kernel separately, then reboot, and voila, you've got the latest beta.

      Oh, you need to make sure you have a buttload of space on your /var partition, or symlink /var/cache/urpmi to somewhere with plenty of room.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    5. Re:Geez 3.1 beta is out by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Err, you don't have to upgrade every single thing every time a new
      version comes out. They make the new versions available for the
      people who _want_ them.

      I have a short list of applications that I update with any
      freqency. (Mostly, Mozilla. I upgrade Mozilla just about
      every milestone, and sometimes in-between.)

      Everything else, I upgrade when it promises a feature that I
      specifically want, or an important security fix, or when I am
      dissatisfied with the stability of a several-versions-old
      version that I have of something.

      *Occasionally*, I get a completely new distribution CD set and
      do a fresh install on a new drive or partition, then copy over
      my data from the old one, but I sure don't do that every time a
      new version of my distro comes out.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  19. nice balenced /. journalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no offense intended towards the KDE folks (you guys rawk), but... 2 KDE stories today, and no mention of Gnome 2.0.1 anywhere... this site is wack.

    1. Re:nice balenced /. journalism... by twener · · Score: 1

      2 interviews of KDE related persons and this, makes 3. :-)

    2. Re:nice balenced /. journalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you see any story about KDE 3.0.3? So don't complain.

    3. Re:nice balenced /. journalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably because CmdrTaco and Hemos both use KDE. Nobody is forcing you to read this site if you do not want to. In fact, if just 10% of you GNOME homos went to other sites, slashdot would be such a nicer place.

  20. Transparency? by RevAaron · · Score: 2

    How does it work in KDE/Qt? There were a few screenshots that showed real-look transparency, in menus for example. Through the menu, you could see the windows below it and/or the desktop. Prior to this, with the exception of a hacked X server, the only transparency I've seen is the transparent-to-root-window like with an eterm or gnome-terminal.

    Is whoever took this SS using a hacked X server, or does Qt now have it's own display sub system that does rendering for all Qt Windows, including let Qt applications share real a alpha channel with eachother?

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    1. Re:Transparency? by Raster+Burn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe it just takes a quick screen shot to create the transparency effect. It does cause a little lag to render the transparency, but I do like the effect. It's not enough of a lag to be annoying on my 850MHz PC.

    2. Re:Transparency? by madstork2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know much about the fundemental architecture, but the transparency I get is from mosfets liquid theme.

      http://www.mosfet.org/liquid.html

      According to his site his theme uses custom QT widgets. But it is easy to install and not special tweaks were needed to the X server.

      I really don't know squat about how it all works, I just thought I would point out this one particular way transparency is handled. Hope it helps get you started.

      MS2k

    3. Re:Transparency? by uchian · · Score: 2

      The effect is a neat little hack, which takes advantage of the fact that whilst you are looking at a menu, none of the underlying windows or anything are going to move. This means that you can just take a screenshot of what's under the menu, and then use that as the basis for you menu when you draw it.

      Sadly, it means it can't be used in the background of eterms, konsole etc. because there is no way to get a screenshot of the underlying windows.

    4. Re:Transparency? by muon1183 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in KDE, there is an option when using the Konsole window to have a transparent background. While you can't actually see what's behind it, it does at least use the background of the current desktop as a background for the terminal. I'm sure this could easily be changed to a screen-shot of the current desktop contents. If you automagically generated this image with a script, you could probably set up Konsole to use this image as a background.

      --

      There's no sig like SIGSEG
    5. Re:Transparency? by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

      Enlightenment has awesome alpha blending capabilities. For example, when moving a window, the entire window can become transparent until you drop it back in place. Although these type of effects are completely gratuitis, they look so darn pretty.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    6. Re:Transparency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what Konsole has currently has been in Eterm for a very long time.

      But what you are suggesting is impossible because there is no way to get a screenshot of everything under a window.

      KDE does menus successfully because the screenshot is taken before the menu is actually shown on screen.

    7. Re:Transparency? by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm dumping Linux and going back to OS X as soon as I can back up some stuff, so I'll have real transparency there- I just wondered how Qt got around the limitations of X11.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    8. Re:Transparency? by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      But they're not real transparency, unless you're using a hacked X server. When the window becomes transparent, I'm assuming that it either takes a screenshot of everything else under it quick, or just shows the wallpaper (like in an eterm)?

      It's even prettier when you have effects like this with a display architecture that actually supports them, like Squeak's Morphic or Mac OS X. In both, I can make any window transparent, and see what is below them. Not just a static look at what's below, like with these KDE menus or moving windows in E, but a live view. And because it's part of the architecture and not a cheap hack to get around limits of X11, they don't require cycles like E tricks do. :)

      In Squeak, you can take this one step further. I can change the color of *any* GUI object I want, and getting transparency is just a matter of specifying the alpha level. It's good fun, I tell you! I typically have my email client and irc client taking up the same real estate, perfectly covering the other... I have both translucent, so if I'm in IRC, I can see when I get a new email, and when I'm doing email, I can see when the channel wakes up. Not only pretty, it can be useful and takes up no extra CPU. :)

      Maybe evas will have some fun stuff like this, finally getting it to all of you X11-heads.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    9. Re:Transparency? by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I guess this is just another effect to make Linux look pretty like MacOS X... But seriously, I don't know if any there are any Linux desktops in development that actually utilize the 3D hardware in most graphics cards. There should be... Unfortunately, the hack in Enlightment is all done on the CPU, which takes a screenshot of what's underneath and adjusts the alpha for the cool effect... it gets the job done, but it's not very efficient (and it's got it's performance hit, especially on a low-end system). What should rather be done is making the desktop interface in OpenGL, so the transparencies can be done more on a GPU, freeing up valuable system resources. I'm not saying that KDE 4.0 (or whatever) should necessarily copy off of Microsoft in making an interface accelerated by the GPU, but then again, I think OS X does something similar. Microsoft is taking it a step further; their new upcoming OS will have a true 3D interface, where each window is a texture... standard GPU's will need more memory bandwidth to support resolutions with many large windows open, so a resource hog it still may be... but it's a good approach nonetheless. 512 mb consumer graphic cards anyone?

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    10. Re:Transparency? by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      Err... You don't need OpenGL or any other 3D interface to get alpha blending. You simply need a graphics system that's better designed than X11. You don't need 3D cards to get alpha channels on the computationally cheap, simply a GUI system that had it in mind when it was designed, rather than relying on hacks like taking screenshots whenever you open up a menu.

      I'm working on an OS/environment targeted for PDAs, and transparency works fine without some mega performance hit on a 50 MHz 486. No way in hell I'd try KDE 3 or E on that though. But again, that's simply by virtue of alpha blending being a feature of Squeak/Dynapad and not a hack. :)

      Offloading your GUI stuff to a GPU makes fine sense, it doesn't matter that Apple did it first and that M$ copied them, and if KDE copies both M$ and Apple. It's still a good enough idea, even if you've got a relatively cheap GUI- your GPU isn't really being used unless you're playing a game, so why not put it to use?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    11. Re:Transparency? by The+Electric+Messiah · · Score: 1

      I'm using Liquid as well, and love it. The desktop "feel" seems to have quicked as well. I highly recommend it.

      --
      "Bold as Love"
    12. Re:Transparency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a feature of the xrender extensions, that have been present since XFree 4.0.2. Keith Packard originally demonstrated such transparent rendering with a hacked version of twm that had transparent menus. This is not new technology - it's been around since aa-fonts!!

    13. Re:Transparency? by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      But in this case, it appears KDE isn't using it- it seems to be using a crappy hack where it takes a screenshot and builds the look of the menu background with it.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  21. multitasking with tabs by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use tabs a lot on sites like Slashdot -- especially once I figured out how to use 'em fast. By checking a couple of preferences in Mozilla, I can control-click (or right-click and select) any link and have it open in a new tab, behind my current web page.

    Usually I scroll down the Slashdot home page, open up a few story links in new tabs without any other interruptions, and keep scrolling. When I'm done, I close that tab and all the stories I wanted to read are loaded and ready.

    You can do the same with multiple windows, I suppose, but it's not as compact and the new browser windows usually load over the one you're currently on, not under it.

    1. Re:multitasking with tabs by (startx) · · Score: 2

      oh it gets better, you can set mozilla to open a link in a new tab with the middle button, and set it to open up in the background.

    2. Re:multitasking with tabs by fiftyfly · · Score: 1

      I do pretty much the same thing and tabs help because my "daily reading list" (http://fiftyfly.mine.nu/kb/links.php) is pretty extensive. Sometimes, if you've gone and opened 30-40 windows, it's easy to forget why that link looked interesting - 45 minutes ago. So I like to open many windows, and keep related links in one mozilla instance via tabs. All the fark links in one window, the /. in another, the various misc bits (like jerry pournelle & today's weather) in another window. That sort of thing.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    3. Re:multitasking with tabs by PzyCrow · · Score: 1

      The main reason I use tabs is that it lets me group windows in diffrent tasks. Keep a /. in one group, and all pr0n in an other, and work related in a third.

      The quick cntext switch is great, just click the work one when the boss comes...

      Seriously, it seems to me that programs is fighting for taskbar space now a days. MSOffice had all new documents in diffrent windows, and showed up on the task bar as diffrent applications. Now they group them (as KDE) in a taskbar menu. And mozilla started with tabs.

      Its a simple problem with a simple solution!! Just and another tab in the WM and assign it to the current application.

      When will people learn?..

    4. Re:multitasking with tabs by robson · · Score: 2

      *Exactly*.
      That, plus the middle-button tab-launch that (startx) mentioned, have been a complete browsing solution for a guy who used to clutter the screen with lots of "Open link in new window" windows.

  22. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess the binutils have not been fixed and the objprelink hack is needed.
    That's too bad. The hack involves an extra jump instruction per function, which makes the code slower after it has been loaded.

  23. KDE RPMs? by dowright27 · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where to find KDE 3.1 beta RPMs?

  24. still ugly by elliotj · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I may be spoiled by Mac OS X (ok, ok, I KNOW I'm spoiled by Mac OS X), but I think KDE is still an ugly interface. What's up with that? They could make it purty,,,why don't they?

    1. Re:still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah I agree. No offense to the KDE artwork people but things need to be improved. Howecome we can't mimic cool, futuristic interfaces like the ones seen in Minority Report? I'd really like to see people stop trying to copy OS X and XP. Let me put my money where my mouth is. Email me at darkness2g@hotmail.com if you want me to get involved with some K artwork and show yall what its all about!

      johnfive

    2. Re:still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even own a Mac and I'll admit that OSX makes Natalie Portman look like Bea Arthur.

    3. Re:still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but I think KDE is still an ugly interface.

      I am sooo fucking sick of losers saying this, but of course having nothing to back it up. HOW is it ugly? Just bitching an moaning helps nobody here.

    4. Re:still ugly by nikal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes you are spoiled.

      1) click on one of the links from www.kde-look.org
      2) read the 4 line instructions on how to install your newly downloaded theme
      3)install it

      Whoops, now your KDE is purty.

      --
      kojent
    5. Re:still ugly by Damek · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I may be spoiled by Mac OS X (ok, ok, I KNOW I'm spoiled by Mac OS X), but I think KDE is still an ugly interface. What's up with that? They could make it purty,,,why don't they?


      How is this insightful? Insightful would be examples and suggestions - if you noted specific areas where it needed improvement. Simply saying you think it is ugly, especially when admitting you're biased towards a proprietary interface, should not merit insightful mods. No, this is most definitely a troll.

      Some people relentlessly insist on missing the point of open source software: you can contribute. If you have nothing to contribute, then don't complain. Complaining is not contributing. Complaining with specific observations and suggestions could be taken as contributing, in the sense of "constructive criticism". But the parent post is merely criticizing, and badly at that.

      Besides, if you don't like the new "Keramik" interface style, then pick a different one. Can you do that on OS X? (BTW, that's an honest question - I won't be buying one any time soon, and haven't had the opportunity to use one, so I don't know). My own personal favorite "look" for KDE is the "Light style, rev. 3", which came built-in with the KDE 3 packages I downloaded for my distribution.
  25. Sexy by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    I'm hoping for some further advances in stability and speed. I'm sick of Konq segfaults from clicking back a few times.

    None the less, KDE 3.1 looks sexy!

    Ya Baby. Ya!

    1. Re:Sexy by twener · · Score: 1

      > I'm sick of Konq segfaults from clicking back a few times.

      You don't run KDE 3.0.3, or? Please upgrade your KDE 3.0.0. :-)

  26. Not like tabbed browsing? by bdowne01 · · Score: 2

    CmdrTaco doesn't like tabbed browsing?

    I'm truly curious...what's there not to like about it?

    Less windows, less clutter, quick access... I'm addicted to it, at least.

    --
    -brain
    1. Re:Not like tabbed browsing? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      for me, I generally don't like it.

      If I have a lot of windows open, it is easier to cycly through them to get the site I want , then it is to get the focus of one window, then cycle through the tabs of that window to get to what I want.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Not like tabbed browsing? by bdowne01 · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. I suppose that makes sense.

      The only problem I have with that approach is that you have to cycle thru all of them just to figure out which is which. It seems with the tabs, the page title is kept somewhat more visible.

      --
      -brain
    3. Re:Not like tabbed browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      harder to go from a window of another program to a hidden tab with one click

      i like top level windows much better.

  27. No more Komplaining about iApps by BeeShoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that it's official now - anyone using KDE has to surrender the right to complain about Apple's naming of iApps. Kolf????? Hmm...

  28. Here are the screenshots ... by binaryfeed · · Score: 1

    Screenshots are here. Enjoy.

    1. Re:Here are the screenshots ... by perlyking · · Score: 2

      Those are alpha 1 screenshots, not the beta. It gives an idea to those of us who havent used a recent KDE version but its not the same as the beta.

      The page gives it away itself "Created on: Friday 28 June 2002" nearly two months old matey.

      --
      no sig.
    2. Re:Here are the screenshots ... by binaryfeed · · Score: 1

      It's the link provided by the kde 3.1 beta release announcement. Perhaps the screenshots of the beta are identical?

  29. Re:KDE DEBs? by Jetson · · Score: 1

    We should start a pool-- how many months until KDE 3.0 is packaged for Debian? What version will the official KDE be on when that happens?

  30. What video card needed ??? by ColdAngel · · Score: 1

    So seem I will have to sold my old GForce2 what the best for kde 3.1 ATI or Nvdia ???

    1. Re:What video card needed ??? by drfreak · · Score: 1

      Your old GeForce2 will work just fine. I use a GeForce 256 which is even older and it works like a dream. Besides, what does your desktop environment have to do with your video card?

    2. Re:What video card needed ??? by static55 · · Score: 1

      any old card with 2d acceleration should work fine, i guess.. 2mb ati rage II + dvd works nicely for me..

  31. Yeah, but is it faster? by lugonn · · Score: 1
    I just started using KDE, and it's a little clunky. I used to have 98 on the same machine, and KDE seems to open apps slower than 98. Konsole alone takes up to 30 secs to open. Granted the machine is a crappy celeron with a quantum bigfoot drive, but I at least thought I'd get a noticable performance boost.

    I haven't rebooted it in over a month though, the matrix screen saver is Kool, and Kandalf isn't half as annoying as Clippy.

    1. Re:Yeah, but is it faster? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Switch to a lighter wm/desktop environmenr.

    2. Re:Yeah, but is it faster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or get a bettter box. my athlon 2200+ works snappy.

      and it is highly unfair to compare a modern version of KDE with win98. You can compare kde1 with it, but you should compare the speed of kde3.x with something like XP.

      More advanced/features=slower, generally.

    3. Re:Yeah, but is it faster? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I have Win2K and FreeBSD/KDE dual booting on my workstation here at work. In my experience, it is KDE that is snappy and responsive while Win2K is the fat slug.

      Suggestions: rebuild XFree86, Qt and KDE to be optimized for your compiler. Odds are you distro has them built for a generic i386. Make sure you have your system configured correctly.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:Yeah, but is it faster? by lugonn · · Score: 1
      I think your right. I tried the 2 suggestions above yours. Limiting my desktop speed up the menus a little, and my DNS was already set properly, but its still a slug.

      I have no idea how to rebuild XFree, but I have some O'Rielly books that might help me get an idea for it. Thanx.

      My toolbox is full of hammers!

    5. Re:Yeah, but is it faster? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how to rebuild XFree

      It's not the easiest thing in the world. The typical "configure; make; make install" won't do it. If you're not set on your distro, you might try Gentoo or one of the BSD's and build from source. Or if you are set on it, check your distro's sources for XFree. Sometimes a build script or .spec file is included that you can tweak for an optimized build.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  32. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The objprelink change made it into binutils one year ago.
    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-0 8/msg0 0311.html
    Question - does this still do a jmp to a jmp for virtual functions?

  33. KDE == ? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Komunist Desktop Environment?

    1. Re:KDE == ? by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Kool, IIRC

      (yes, I know it was joke)

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    2. Re:KDE == ? by rweir · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you mean 'Kommunist Desktop Environment'. Look at what the American education system has come to: good, patrioitic Americans can't even deliberately mispell their racial slurs!

      (ObModCom: "I'm sure I'll be modded down", etc)
      (ObMetaModCom: "By the secret rules of the Slashdot cabal, you now have to mod me up! Haha!")

  34. Damn 56k modems... by MoogMan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Bleeding eck mun! 90% through the download of 3.0 beta 1 and they tell me that theres a NEW beta! Oh well, time to stop the download and restart with the new beta :p At this rate, i'll not be able to upgrade from my KDE 1 beta 1. Damn 56k modems...

  35. Have Themes, Will Travel... by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    I may be spoiled by Mac OS X (ok, ok, I KNOW I'm spoiled by Mac OS X), but I think KDE is still an ugly interface. What's up with that? They could make it purty,,,why don't they?

    Apple owns a patent on the "Attractive Eye Candy for the Computationally Illiterate" interface, while Microsoft owns a patent on the "Eternally Broken, Never Secure, but marginally easy to use for a few minutes before it crashes" interface.

    Alas, that only leaves the "Relatively Spartant Trimmings, But Rock Solid Performance" interface available to free software developers, so that is what we are stuck with.

    [/humor]

    Seriously, though, KDE and Gnome both support themes, so in answer to your question

    "They could make it purty,,,why don't they?"

    the answer is "Why don't you?" No one knows your aesthetic preferences better than you, and you have all of the tools available to make it as purty, according to whatever those aesthetic preferences may be, as you wish. The KDE folks meanwhile will concentrate on what is important and aesthetic to them, but do not forget that they have thoughtfully made it possible for you to create your own theme, and make KDE as purty as you wish.

    Ditto for Gnome, for that matter.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  36. Tabbed Browsing? Not quite by J_DarkElf · · Score: 1

    Like Mozilla, Konq doesn't offer real MDI browsing -- it just lets you open multiple maximized windows inside one parent app.
    The speed gain by using this kind of MDI, is almost nill, especially compared to Opera's elegant MDI mode.

    Full-screen tabbed browsing is no tabbed browsing at all.

    1. Re:Tabbed Browsing? Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what then are signs of "real" MDI browsing?

  37. More tabbed goodness by INT+21h · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Furthermore, in Galeon you can:

    1. reorder the tabs for optimum browsing (by click+draw), then you select the first (or last) tab, read it, close it, and Hey! Presto! find yourself already reading the tab that is now first (last)
    2. save all tabs and windows as sessions and thus swap between several readymade sets of pages (in case the boss comes over, just load the work-session)
    3. open all bookmarks in bookmark-folder as tabs, in the background (right-click on folder, choose "Open whole folder as tabs"), go to the water-cooler and come back to, say, all your webcomics ready loaded
    4. if you really need a new window you can pull a tab off (drop it outside the window) and it'll be a separate window. If you want to reattach it there's "Move to another window" in the "Tab"-menu

    It really, really hurts browsing with something else than Galeon now, I never should have installed it :)

    BTW, anyone got a quick fix for getting non-ascii titles to display correctly?

  38. XP clone nearly complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does anyone working on KDE have an original thought of their own?

    1. Re:XP clone nearly complete by mabinogi · · Score: 2

      If you have a suggestion, feel free to contribute :)

      If you don't, then your annoymous troll on a non kde specific web site will probably be tragically overlooked.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  39. Dry humor at its best! by cthompso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    well done ;)

    1. Re:Dry humor at its best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! :)

      -- 70%

  40. Why I like tabbed browsing: examples by Vicegrip · · Score: 2

    1. website X's story has a link to another website. I "right click-select: open in new tab". Now the two pages that are related are in the same client. This way, when I'm writing a reply I can cross-reference the linked story without having to worry about loosing what I'm writing by using the back/foward button.
    Summary: it reduces desktop clutter by allowing me to keep similarly related pages in the same browser instance without requiring back/forward button usage (which causes webpages to forget what you inputed at times).

    2. I'm reading an article that spans multiple pages and writing a summary (obviously easier to do if you have the entire article at your finger tips). Without tabbed browsing, I'd have to open multiple windows to avoid the back button which makes the damn flashy thingies reload everytime. If the article is 5 pages long, that makes for a lot of browser windows and a lot of annoying manual window management.

    3. Some websites insist on opening new windows to show some piece of information. Personally, I find that "load in new tab" feature priceless for such sites (example: the previews on kde-look.org).

    These examples all revolve around situations where multiple windows are annoying and slow me down. Tabbed browsing, is imho an essential evolution in the presentation of webpages-- I would find the web incredibly more annoying without them.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  41. Download management. by drsquare · · Score: 1

    One of the things I noticed in the screenshots of Konqueror was the way it handled downloads. Like most other browsers, the download comes up in a little dialogue box of its own.

    However, the way I prefer is how Opera does it. I.e. it has a seperate tab for the downloads, and in that sub-window there is a list of all the downloads, showing progress and speed for each one.

    When you're downloading multiple files, this is a godsend, as you can manage and monitor them all in one place, without little dialogue boxes everywhere.

    I'd like to see Konqueror and perhaps Mozilla adopt such a system.

    1. Re:Download management. by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
      [...]in that sub-window there is a list of all the downloads, showing progress and speed for each one.[...]

      Haven't played with it much yet myself, but look into kget (in the kdenetwork package). If you enable "integration with Konqueror" it also takes over downloads initiated by the browser.

      I've only toyed with it a bit, but it appears that it works precisely as you ask, with all of the downloads in one window, at least as far as I can tell at this point.

    2. Re:Download management. by geekster · · Score: 1

      Mozilla 1.1 and Konqueror in KDE 3.1 will both have a download manager.

    3. Re:Download management. by muon1183 · · Score: 1

      Mozilla does in fact have a mode for this. If you look around in the preferences, there is something called a download manager. I believe this is exactly what you are looking for.

      --

      There's no sig like SIGSEG
    4. Re:Download management. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
      Well, there is a setting that will let you collect all the downloads into one window. It's not tabs, it's a list, but it's similar. I don't remember where it is, but it's fairly obvious if you look in the preferences dialog.

      If that's not good enough, you can switch of kwm and replace it with a tabbed window manager that lets you collect any and all of your windows together into tabs. I think pwm is such a manager, though I could be wrong. So really you do have quite a bit of flexibility here.

    5. Re:Download management. by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 1

      Mozilla has an option to do this in a sub-window- "use download manager" or something (I'm at work and can't install mozilla here so I can't check the exact name). It would be nice to have this in a tab though (same with mozilla mail and news).

      --
      ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
      where the eye of his telescope has already been
    6. Re:Download management. by twener · · Score: 1

      This is possible since at least KDE 2.2: Activate in Control Center/File Browsing/File Manager the "Show network operations in a single window" option.

    7. Re:Download management. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kget (konq 3.1), moz 1.1, and mac IE 3.x, 4.x, and 5.x all have this.

      the feature was in macIE 3.x before it made it to opera (with 4.1, I beleive)

      I don't know why the windows IE doesn't have it, but it's probably because there are two different teams working on them.

  42. Just learn to use the keyboard. by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    If you use the keyboard then the problem you describe is a snap -- use alt-tab to get to the mozilla window, then ctrl-pageup and ctrl-pagedn to move between tabs (Mozilla). Then it shouldn't matter that one is your WM and the other an application.

    Anyway, I love tabbed browsing. Being able to group all of my "slashdot reading" in one window is excellent, especially since I have them load in the background and so they're all loaded by the time I get around to reading them! In fact, my brother is by no means a computer expert, and I switched him to Mozilla just by showing him tabs. It's not a small minority who like this feature, believe me...

    1. Re:Just learn to use the keyboard. by asteinberg · · Score: 1

      Or, if you prefer the mouse, you can try out some gestures. Just move the mouse up, then right or left (like an upside-down L) to go to the next/prev tab. At least, that's how it works in Galeon and in Opera, I forget if you need a plugin to get Mozilla to do it or not.

      Hmm, now that I think about it, it would be nice if they also implemented a way to change windows by holding down the right mouse button and then scrolling with the wheel. This would be much more efficient (do they do this in Opera? I forget now, but it reminds me of Opera's way of going back and forward by holding down the right button and clicking the left, or holding the left button and clicking the right).

      --
      The first ever Ultimate Frisbee video game: here (now
    2. Re:Just learn to use the keyboard. by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Been wishing for a hotkey for that for a while now. Glad to finally find it, although ctrl-pagedown is quite clumsy, not nearly as nice as alt-tab. I can probably change it I guess, but am too lazy right now, gotta figure out how-maybe later.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
  43. You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The piece is meant to poke fun at our idiot administration and our idiot citizens who buy all the Bullshit washington can muster. You are a drone too. Go back and play some minesweeper.

  44. tastes great, but with less filling? by robofunk · · Score: 1

    how much ram does your kde require?

    1. Re:tastes great, but with less filling? by fredan · · Score: 1

      It takes about 19% of my memory, when it has started. take a look. Why the pictures says it's 22% is that snapshot has taken the 3%...

    2. Re:tastes great, but with less filling? by twener · · Score: 1

      You can't say how much KDE takes by looking at this screenshot. How much does X use? What other programs run?

    3. Re:tastes great, but with less filling? by fredan · · Score: 1

      well, yes and no. This screenshot was taken just after loginprocess, which was started as "kdm". So this is kde memory footprint just after the login (okey, not only kde's footprint).
      But, I didn't run any other programs, other that was started during the boot process, which shall be cups, the nfs (portmap and rpc.statd) and the gpm program. (I'm running LFS on my computer).

  45. What I love about KDE the most by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    The Minimize shortcuts!

    I open 30 applications at once, and am constantly switching. Usually, I only want one or two windows up at a time, and I'd like the rest minimized.

    AFAIK, KDE is the only linux desktop environment that has a "show desktop" (minimize all) shortcut, as well as a minimize one window shortcut. I love those.

    And that is the only reason I use kde instead of IceWM. Of course, other people have their important feature, but ... they add up.

    I wish, though, that compiling kde was more like compiling the kernel - features could be removed and added. For instance, I don't really care about the file manager in KDE, and I'd do just as well without the space it takes.

    In fact, if possible, I'd like to have just a panel and the shortcuts; I need no sound manager, no file manager, and no desktop manager. Wouldn't it be nice if such were possible?

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:What I love about KDE the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has such a shortcut too. -M will minimize all of the windows, showing you the desktop.

    2. Re:What I love about KDE the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The latest icewm does actually have that binding.

    3. Re:What I love about KDE the most by damiam · · Score: 1

      You can easily set that up with Sawfish, the GNOME 2 default wm. In the GNOME menu, go to Desktop Preferences > Advanced > Sawfish > Key Bindings, and bind whatever shortcut you want to "Iconify workspace windows", or whatever you want.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:What I love about KDE the most by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thats how I learned to like it. And its "windows key"+M. Its the same for my key bindings in kde.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:What I love about KDE the most by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      I would very much like to use it...
      Are you sure? How do you set that up?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:What I love about KDE the most by JBv · · Score: 1

      In window/desktop managers I prefer to use virtual desktops. I'm currently using 8 and, together with a pager with a decent preview (kpager), i can get by almost without minimizing windows.

      I only use those minimize shortcuts in windows because it has no virtual desktops. It drives me nuts drilling for references, following multiple links with 12 windows all shuffeled arround the taskbar at random.

      If you require so many windows open, do try using more desktops in KDE.

  46. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by bokketies · · Score: 1

    Forget objprelink.

    You really should use gcc 3.1 or 3.2. Together with the newer binutils you will gain dramatic (as in: it flies) performance increases.

    By supplying -z combreloc as an extra argument to g++ the relocations are done (mostly) at link time, not when you start the application.

    It's really awesome - the gcc guys did a great job. Some of my code runs 50% faster compiled with gcc 3.2 versus 2.95.

    Some more info can be found here

  47. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by bokketies · · Score: 1

    Forgot to mention that the resulting binaries are a lot smaller too. Typically 2/3 the size of something compiled with gcc 2.95.

    ----
    Dutch readers might be interested in Berichten van een Systeemtrader

  48. Tabbed browsing is smart, here's why. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but tabs are a feature I always turn off. I mean, I'm not mad they're there, but I tried using them and didn't like them. The basic problem with tabs is that they force you to switch windows at two totally different places on your desktop.

    Actually, tabbed browsing is completely logical, given the way the desktop and file manager theme is carried out on modern OS's.

    Think about it...

    Each tab in your window manager is associated with a running program. You click on Mozilla or Konq, and within that program are more tabs associated with multiple views of data for that program.

    It's like expanding a folder in your file manager. Opening up a new window for each new page you want to view is akin to putting all your files in one huge directory. It just makes it harder to locate what you want as the number of files (windows) increases.

    Tabbed browsing also decreases resource usage. Instead of having a new window open for each page, you have one window with multiple page views available. The resource usage is constrained to what is necessary to render the page, minimizing all the other widgets and menus normally needed for a complete window for each page.

    The tabbed interface can be found in other similar programs, such as GUI text editors (www.ultraedit.com is one of my favorites on the Windows platform). I often have 20 files open at a time, and a dozen web pages. Between those two programs, I'd have 30+ windows open without the tabbed interface. No thanks!

    Not to mention how nice tabbed browsing is for reading blogs and newspapers. I go through my favorites: slashdot, cnn, my local newspaper, news.com, etc (incidentally, I have one bookmark that opens up all these pages at once with a single click... thanks to tabbed browsing and the cool bookmarks available in mozilla). Each site I middle-click all the interesting links, stacking up other pages to peruse, without taking my immediate attention away from what I am scanning.

    I'm sure eventually you will be able to move the tab row in mozilla/konq to the bottom of the screen, to be closer to where most people have their window manager programs running. It doesn't make much difference to me, as the rest of the menu, bookmarks, and url bar are all located right by the browser tabs. It'd make more sense to drag your window manager bar to the top of the screen, if your UI allows.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  49. It's your config. by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    I'm afraid I can't tell you precisely where your problem is but, it is definitely your configuration that is causing that delay. I have an old PII 300 with a super slow hard drive and KDE 3.0, 2.2 prior to that, Konsole opens in less than 2 seconds with both versions.

    One very common linux misconfiguration that causes 30 second delays in everything you do is DNS. Most Linux tasks will perform a DNS lookup at some point or another, even Konsole verifies the local system name upon startup. Most people don't have their own DNS server with their hostname on it so, local configuration is important.

    Look in the file /etc/host.conf it should look like this:
    order hosts,bind

    Then look in /etc/hosts it should *at least* have this:
    127.0.0.1 yourservername localhost

    If your system isn't configured in this way, you have likely found the problem with your application startup speed.

    1. Re:It's your config. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tips! I'm gonna check to see if they speed up my already awesome Gentoo 1.2 setup. :)

  50. Re:KDE DEBs? by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 1
    --

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
  51. More than half of MS' programmers are immigrants.. by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    OK, I know that this was supposed to be satire.

    Magnus.

  52. Not just spoiled. by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    You are missing the point. One of the design goals of the KDE desktop is to, out of the box, look and feel similar enough to Windows that Windows users (the most users on the planet) will be able to use it immediately and possibly win them over after they have had a chance to see how much more it can do. In order to meet this goal, the default configuration is intentionally setup to look and feel like Windows. In the case of KDE 3.1 the target is Windows XP. By default KDE 3.1 looks similar enough to Windows XP to not frighten of the typical Windows user. Furthermore, it is a matter of taste which is very subjective but, many people very much like the Windows XPish interface.

    Regardless of your taste though, KDE's appearance is infinitely configurable. You can make it look like ANYTHING you want Windows 3.1, 95, 98, NT, 2000, XP, Mac OS8, OS X, Solaris CDE, Motif, or any of a few hundred cool and bizarre looks that you have never dreamed of. You can change the colors, fonts, icons, textures, backgrounds, whatever. Or if you don't want any hassle, you can simple download one or more of hundreds of themes that others have already compiled. You might be interested in Mosfet's Liquid which is an OS X mimic, though not so much to draw an Apple lawsuit.

  53. New style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To those just looking at the screenshots, please don't judge KDE on how terrible it looks in them. For whatever reason the default setup is gaudily ugly, but you can change it to look respectable quite easily. You can change the shiny widgets and icons (they make me puke almost as much as aqua), and change the ridiculously oversized window manager titlebar. KDE 3 is fantastic, don't let the default look get in your way.

  54. How I learned to stop worrying & loved the tab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just my 2 cents...

    Tabbed browsing (galeon since i couldn't get alpha konqueror not to crash) and tabbed terminals (konsole) is why I finally switched to linux as desktop. Though i love linux, I much preferred to have windows as my desktop. But with proper key remappings (Alt-L and Alt-H to move between the tabs -- you need latest konsole for that remapping), this has been the best desktop setting I have ever had. Don't even have to move the thumb from the Alt key. No cluttering and much faster switching (having 5-6 browser windows and at least 3-4 terminals is a sure invitation to RSI).

    AC.

  55. Re:Tabbed browsing = Crazy Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crasy Browser IS the choice wor windows:
    - IE engine
    - Tabbed browsing
    - popup filtering
    - and more.

    Fortunately, I'll find this on my konqueror :-) tabbed audiocd:/ a wonderfull feature :-)))

  56. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by twener · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your answer is wrong, objprelink is obsolete. See http://objprelink.sourceforge.net/.

  57. Re:Have they fixed C++ binary symbol preloading ye by twener · · Score: 1

    And with additional "prelink" applied, it flies more. Do the Red Hat Betas ship with it?

  58. just right a stupid web browser by dswensen · · Score: 0, Troll

    ugh, KDE

  59. Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work on Kmail funded by German Government, not bad. I know the guy behind the aegypten project.

    hmmm.
    What does your gov do for oss revolution?

    It so sad that so much public money i spend on -howtocreateanexcelsheet- education courses.

  60. Tabs rock by Ogerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still can't say I care for tabbed browsing, but a lot of people swear by it.

    Browser tabs are like mouse wheels. They seem pointless at first, but then you get used to them and it's hard to go back. It's a subtle change, but consider how it affects the way you use the GUI: 1.) all web browsing is contained in a single window frame, thus making it easier to mentally seperate from other tasks, 2.) WM taskbars get shuffled, and make it easy to lose track of which windows belong to which applications. Browser tabs stay in the order that web pages were opened are spacially seperate. 3.) When doing heavy web browsing.. ie.) 10 windows open, it's much easier to have all controls at the top of the screen. instead of jumping around.

    1. Re:Tabs rock by Peaker · · Score: 2

      Heard of multiple desktops? :)

      Besides, its a feature the WM can and should implement (tab-looking window switching) if people like it so much.

      Anyhow, why shouldn't I be able to mentally group browsing windows with non-browsing windows? (Music-related, Programming-related, rather than browsing-related or chat-related?)

  61. Are you insane ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    by reading your comment my conclusion has to be that you are completely nuts... It's been a long time since I last read worse bullshit!

    I seriously hope you are not serious.

  62. kde - x by aztektum · · Score: 2

    am i nuts or imagining things b/c i thot at some point soon KDE is gonna move away from using XWindows/XFree/whatever

    does anyone know if this is true or should i start taking my medicine again? oh those damn voices are so duplicitous

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:kde - x by scrytch · · Score: 2

      am i nuts or imagining things b/c i thot at some point soon KDE is gonna move away from using XWindows/XFree/whatever

      The only thing about KDE that really depends on X is DCOP. Everything else is through Qt, which already is orthogonal to X. KDE really doesn't care about X, but I sincerely doubt they'd endorse the idea of throwing out the standard desktop underpinnings. I suggest upping your dosage.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  63. I'm curious.... by Shade,+The · · Score: 2

    I'm curious; what makes Opera's MDI mode better than Mozilla et all's tabbed browsing feature?

    Oh, and by the way, is there a keyboard shortcut for changing tabs in mozilla?

    1. Re:I'm curious.... by J_DarkElf · · Score: 1

      In Opera, MDI windows are not necessarily maximized.

      For a very simple example: Screenshot @ Opera.com

      I don't really see the difference between forced-fullscreen MDI and SDI.

    2. Re:I'm curious.... by damiam · · Score: 1
      a. Nothing - non-fullscreen MDI is useless

      b. Yes - Control-PageUp/PageDown (IIRC - I use Galeon)

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  64. Molested by bayankaran · · Score: 0

    He/She was molested by a taggedbrowser when he/she was a kid.

    I am sure cmdrTaco is a he or a she.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  65. Where is kde headed? by bass_miologics · · Score: 1
    I think kde has reached the point where a lot of the essential stuff and a lot of luxuries are done.
    Where does it go now? It has virtually nothing left to learn from windows or osX. Maybe some minor usability issues, but from now on it's mostly undiscovered territory. A great opportunity for the project. Free software is a great way of tying things together and coming up with new ideas. kde needs to keep taking full advantage of other free software projects as it has in the past. Look at how it integrates seamlessly with ogg vorbis for example. How cool is it that you can pop in a cd and suddenly kde provides the tools for you to easily make full use of another great FS project? Teaming up like that is great.

    Microsoft would like everyone to think they have the market on innovation cornered. They don't.
    What's next for kde? My suggestion is a think-tank. We need a kde think tank to come up with brand new directions to take kde. New features. Things no one has thought of or implemented. How to take the destkop and make in more productive, less hostile, prettier. This is where I think the future of kde should be. Trying out ideas that are way out there and at the same time making the details perfect.

    Kde is paused to become one of the killer apps of the future for linux. The framework is there. The libraries and IPC are there. Everything needed to make it on par with any other D.E. is there. Now let's blow everyone away. Let's give them something that will get people so excited they will migrate to linux because they have to have it.

    If I may put in my $0.02, I would love more progress on the python bindings for qt and kde. The documentation out there is very poor, the bindings not the easiest to install and theres not much guidance for the less experienced. Python is an incredible language for developing apps FAST and easily. QT is a great toolkit and kde a great framework. If the documentation was up to par... I could see people suddenly getting very productive and creative with kde apps. I know this isn't a radical idea. I just think it would bring a great deal of creativity into the kde developer midst.

    1. Re:Where is kde headed? by twener · · Score: 1

      > Where does it go now?

      See the incomplete KDE 3.2 feature plan. And don't forget to make KOffice the best office suite ever. Think about other missing applications. I don't expect that KDE will create a "new desktop" concept.

  66. God help us all indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If morons like you start breeding... holy shit can people be stupid

  67. Does cut-n-paste work yet ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I cut and paste between applications yet ?

    1. Re:Does cut-n-paste work yet ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What dumb question, of course! Already with KDE 2.2 or at least 3.0 depending how you're looking at it.

  68. Fixed objprelink? by be-fan · · Score: 2

    I heared the re-enabled prelink in 3.0.3. In idea why, and does it also work in 3.1 beta 1?

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Fixed objprelink? by twener · · Score: 1

      Re-Enabled? But I guess you don't even know the difference between "objprelink" and "prelink". "objprelink" support is still in KDE's build system for systems with old binutils, marked as obsolete and as always has to be enabled additionally.

    2. Re:Fixed objprelink? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Ack, I meant to type objprelink.

      But I guess you don't even know the difference between "objprelink" and "prelink".
      >>>>>>>
      A bit presumptous of you don't you think? I'll bet I've hacked around with prelink and object than you have. This includes running it through debug sessions under gdb and getting it working on my redhat rawhide install. Be a little more tactful in the future.

      As for objprelink, you should know that it has been broken for most of the 3.0 series. I was specifically referring to this post on dot.kde.org:

      Re: 3.0.3 upgrade?
      by fredan on Tuesday 20/Aug/2002, @12:29

      Nobody is saying anything about the new gcc release.

      I can say something. Yesterday I compiled 3.0.3 with gcc 3.1.1 with options like -march=athlon -mmmx -md3now and they have also enabled objprelink again, so it's fast!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Fixed objprelink? by twener · · Score: 1

      It's obsolete and disabled by default, this user is wrong.

  69. Code folding! by eli173 · · Score: 1

    Ok, somebody's been spying on my brain...
    The code folding feature of Kate is something I've been wishing for for a long time.
    Does anyone know if gvim has this feature?

    Eli

    1. Re:Code folding! by snofla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      try :help folding

      --
      i don't like style guides
    2. Re:Code folding! by eli173 · · Score: 1

      Excellent :)
      Thank you for replying!

      Eli

  70. dammit ... beta by Whatthehellever · · Score: 1

    How many times has THIS happened: as soon as your fav distro has gone beta, a new version of KDE is released, guaranteed NOT to make the final release of that beta distro.

    --

    ---
    IMHO, of course.
    May the SOURCE be with you.
  71. That's too much work... by chrisbord · · Score: 1

    ...for me. I want to just open the darned browser! I don't want to think, "ok, i want this one on 3, this one on 2, where's that other? Oh yeah, it was on 4...no 3 is too crowded, let's to to 1...OK now i'm ready to start the friggin' app!" Desktops hide each running app in a certain desktop so you have to go searching for apps; what's the point, a less 'crunched' taskbar? If that's all you want, just expand it's size.

    1. Re:That's too much work... by Peaker · · Score: 2

      Selecting where you want the program to start takes a single extra click (Before launching the browser), or a couple of clicks if its already launched.

      Letting it automatically barf it up on your single tab doesn't let you group things together as you wish. You could ofcourse tell your window manager: "Start browser windows on desktop 6" to get the same effect as tabbed browsing, but this is crappy (as tabbed browsing is).

      You don't have to go 'search for apps', because YOU organized them in a way its easy for you to remmember. My financial app? Its in the financial desktop, ofcourse.

  72. Usability by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2
    I was really happy when I saw this bit in the press release:

    KDE usability. The KDE Usability Project has improved the KDE User Interface Guidelines compliance of almost all applications. Additional usability enhancements were made to the panel (Kicker), the desktop calculator (KCalc) and the screenshot utility (KSnapshot).

    This is really cool. They are following very clear GUI Guidelines (see link above) and they have the Usability team checking that every application follows these guidelines. IMHO Usability (more than Features) is the only major missing link in the GNU/Linux desktop. I am really looking forward to KDE 3.1 ...

    1. Re:Usability by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      So does Gnome..

      A group of us tried to combine the two efforts into one generic UI guideline, but like most of my projects, it collapsed when we realised how much work it would be.

  73. xparts - kmozilla? by elliott666 · · Score: 1

    has anyone had any luck compling kmozilla (from kdebindings). I can never tell if it's mdk cooker's fault for failed compiles or simply some untested code.

  74. KDE Beta ... woohoo by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

    Hard to tell what's beta and what's not with KDE....
    Tab-browsing's a nice thing to have but mozilla has that already. Why do the KDE
    folks put so much energy into Konqueror when mozilla is already very good and stable?
    There are other parts of KDE that would benefit from some extra effort. Konqueror is
    just not worth all the effort it's given.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Fonts are ugly by AlanSmitheeX · · Score: 0

    blah...

  77. Re:Where is kde headed? -- Wishlist items. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1


    Faar too lazy to implement this myself, but
    if anyone is asking... My wishlist:

    Comprehensive, language neutral scripting would
    be a great thing. There's pyKDE (for python)
    but that is for writing KDE apps in python, not
    programming existing apps. KSpread has it's
    own language KOScript, but it is not used anywhere
    else. It would be cool to have an over-arching
    scripting interface.

    GUI-less support: I want my
    computer to log onto the net @ 4am, get
    some data, and then work on it, and have
    it ready for breakfast. So I make a cron
    job to bring the Internet up with kppp, and
    then use kio to get the file and do the
    natural (according to the file associations
    thing with it.) Thing is, I am not logged
    in, so there isn't any environment running,
    and no X. What about an alarm clock that
    works when I'm not logged in.

    It would be nice to not make people learn a w
    hole other set of non-kde apps before they
    can use the power of UNIX style boxes.

    Oh, and I'd like one of the scripting
    languages supported to be Visual basic.
    Life is kind of boring without viruses.

  78. [OT] All the Mozilla Key Commands by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    Here's a list of all of them:

    http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ui/accessibility /m ozkeylist.html

  79. It should work by r6144 · · Score: 1
    If you mean tab titles, my galeon has always displayed Chinese titles correctly. Maybe just set LANG correctly.

    If your window titles mess up, check the config of your window manager. It is not galeon's fault.

  80. UI Improvements are Always Resisted by wahay · · Score: 1

    Tabbed browsing, huh?

    I remember the real one. In 1984. When everyone who owned a computer tried to convince me that owning a mouse was immoral. "Don't turn a computer into a stupid toy" they said.

    I remember people who insisted that Pine was a horrible disfigurement of unix mail.

    I remember people who thought Windows95 destroyed windows. "How slow!" they said.

    If you don't like tabs....well, fine Nerdosaurous. I don't think anybody should be forced to get with the present. Certainly not. Just remember that you Not liking something doesn't mean that it's flawed....or you can join all the fossils out there that are PROUD that they can't compute.

    Sigh.

  81. JEdit is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree that JEdit is great. You can download and update plugins from within the application. It provides great customizability of the editor pane. I have it setup as follows: console plugin dropdown on top, plugin "taskbar" on the left of the editor pane, and tabs along the bottom of the browser pane.

    I also appreciate the wrap-guide, the ftp plugin, and the search/replace dialog that allows regular expression search/replace on the current buffer, all buffers, or on a directory.

    There are also plugins for project management and for receiving compiler output.

  82. Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0