Slashdot Mirror


Ogg Vorbis For Hardware Makers

SerpicoWasTaken writes "CNET has a story announcing the release of Tremor. It's an Ogg Vorbis (Vogg Gorbis, Vogg Orbus, or Ogg [unintelligable] as pronounced by the various managers in my office) decoder that does not require a floating point unit and could herald the rise of Ogg Vorbis compatible MP3 players." Update: 09/04 21:00 GMT by T : Sorry -- this story's a dupe.

161 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Duplicate by streak · · Score: 2

    Well, we saw this story yesterday,
    here

    1. Re:Duplicate by rosewood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Still on the first page none the less

      yet, they wont post that video games are banished in greece?

    2. Re:Duplicate by SailorFrag · · Score: 1

      They did already in the last slashback.

    3. Re:Duplicate by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

      I was forwarded that story by a friend too and nearly posted it. But I also figured that it would have already been a dup or someone else would beat me to the punch so I didn't...

      I'm disappointed that the video games banished in Greece didn't make Slashdot yet.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    4. Re:Duplicate by Milalwi · · Score: 2

      Still on the first page none the less

      Man, you got a lot of stuff on your front page... or you've got a lot hidden. ;-)


      yet, they wont post that video games are banished in greece?

      It was in a Slashback

      Milalwi
  2. Hey Tim by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tim must've been talking on his cell phone while posting this duplicate article.

  3. Let it begin! by SkulkCU · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
    1. Re:Let it begin! by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      Weird. The original story SkulkCU referenced does not appear in the "older stuff" slashbox for my login. Anyone else have that problem?

    2. Re:Let it begin! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're blocking stories from michael?

      Considered doing it, given how much editorializing he does. Particularly since it's usually wrong.

    3. Re:Let it begin! by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm only blocking Katz. I figured it out - the original story was so new that it was still showing up at the bottom of the main page - hadn't yet tripped over to the "older stuff" section.

  4. not so fast... by Longinus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "could herald the rise of Ogg Vorbis compatible MP3 players."

    Wouldn't that make them Ogg Vorbis players?

    1. Re:not so fast... by m2pc · · Score: 1

      Well, OGG Vorbis/MP3 Players... I don't think they're talking about *replacing* the MP3 decoder with an OGG Vorbis decoder, but rather encouraging hardware manufacturers to consider adding support for OGG. Besides, there are already players that play both MP3 and WMA. OGG is just another format from a hardware standpoint.

    2. Re:not so fast... by Longinus · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize that, I was just poking fun at the mislabeling of mutli-codec audio players as "MP3 players."

    3. Re:not so fast... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      If there is a cost on the MP3 decoder I would assume that going forward they would drop the license for it and proceed with the OGG only ?
      I wonder if the cost savings is worth the effort to rewrite all my music ?

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    4. Re:not so fast... by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      Try going into Circuit City or Best Buy and asking for a "multi-codec audio player." :)

    5. Re:not so fast... by _Swank · · Score: 1

      isn't it just as big of a mistake to then call them "Ogg Vorbis players."

    6. Re:not so fast... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      To correct both of you. If it is only a "player", it wouldn't be an audio enCOder/DECoder. So what you would want to ask for, is a multi-format audio player. Probally want to specify that wish support for lossy audio compression formats, just so they don't get confused.

    7. Re:not so fast... by Longinus · · Score: 1

      Not neccessarily, it depends on what you mean by "them." If a piece of audio hardware plays only Ogg Vorbis, then one could say it is an Ogg Vorbis player, but if said hardware also plays, say, MP3s and WMA (blech!), then it would perhaps best be called a digital audio player, or multi-format audio player, or something like that. Since neither exist as of yet, it is not possible to make the mistake of calling "them" Ogg Vorbis players. But I see your point.

    8. Re:not so fast... by The_Dougster · · Score: 1
      What the heck is WMA? No, wait, I bet it is some fantastic new Microsoft-only audio format which will do for music what BMP did for images! Heck I guess I better format my hard drive and go get WinXP or else I will be left behind, hey everybody jump on the WMA bandwagon! Look, everybody's doing it!

      Why, oh why, must they always reinvent everything. Reminds me of the Serious Sam Easter Egg where the Old Man Murray guys are riding around in a little car with square wheels...

      Oggs are great. I don't share my music with anybody else anyways, so I couldn't give a rat's ass what everybody else uses. Yessir, I like 'em.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
  5. c'mon by lamp77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    could at least just put it in a slashback.

    1. Re:c'mon by Snowgen · · Score: 1

      could at least just put it in a slashback.

      They will.

      Twice. :-)

    2. Re:c'mon by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "could at least just put it in a slashback."

      Sorry about the temporal incongruity folks, my Tardis has been acting funny since I spilled carrot juice on the console. I'd fix it if some AC wasn't trying to kill me.

      --Doc

  6. This was posted yesterday.... by puppetman · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What else can I say?

  7. In Soviet Russa... by Your_Mom · · Score: 2
    ...Stories Repeat you!

    Oh this isn't Fark.com? I'll get my coat.

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    1. Re:In Soviet Russa... by Disevidence · · Score: 1

      Your Mum

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    2. Re:In Soviet Russa... by Your_Mom · · Score: 1

      Just a lurker, I never comment.

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
  8. Heard this yesterday by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

    Repost!

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  9. Older Stuff block? by Knightmare · · Score: 1

    Are the posters on slashdot not allowed to have this block on their page? Because a quick glance over there would have kept this from happening and taking up one of the 14 story slots for today.

  10. Timothy sucks by Laplace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There isn't much more to say about that. Timothy sucks. Boo!

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
  11. I want one . . . by JWL-23 · · Score: 1

    . . . because .ogg files sound better than .mp3 anyway.

  12. w00t for what? by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    Many manufacturers have said they are playing it safe and are waiting for Ogg Vorbis to develop a large following before they devote any development work to the format.

    Just like Linux on the desktop... Let's face it, everyone has paid the MP3 licensing fees who are going to. Ogg is relatively unknown, hell, MP3 was unknown until Napster popularized it.

    Its going to be a long while before we see iPod with Ogg capabilities... because there just isn't enough critical mass.

  13. its pronounced as hog without the h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dumbasses.
    Thats the problem with geeks. They make words that no one can pronounce like
    linux (lin-ucks)
    GNU (Guh-new)
    KDE
    ogg (ogg)
    Slashdot (/.)
    1337 (One thousand, three hundred and thirty seven)

    1. Re:its pronounced as hog without the h by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dumbasses.
      Thats the problem with geeks. They make words that no one can pronounce like
      linux (lin-ucks)
      GNU (Guh-new)


      I thought this too, but then I wondered if it's an intentional "freudian slip" in the backs of our minds. By making our top-secret geek tools unpleasant to say, it will stay out of the mouths of people who like to "nip things in the bud" before they get a chance to grow.

      Most RIAA and MPAA execs are pampered babies who don't like to hear ugly things...how many times do you think the word "Ogg" will float around the RIAA boardroom? They are too egotistical and full of themselves...

      So this is pretty cool, it's like geekcode for the verbal "word-of-mouth" space.

      Once OGG is locked solid and working...we can always rename it to something more appealing later. So the theme is...first we built the lawyer-proof tanks, then we release them into the public domain...I love it!

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:its pronounced as hog without the h by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      Once OGG is locked solid and working...we can always rename it to something more appealing later. So the theme is...

      Actually, there is no reason that the file name or extension has to be the same as the decoder..Word files aren't mydocument.wrd.. kinda like how .avi format movies could use a multiple of several decoders.. why not just call them .mp3 and expect people to upgrade to the new version.. (that would be mean :) ) or more seriously just call them song-name.music to imply that they are music.. i think that would probably catch on..

    3. Re:its pronounced as hog without the h by memfree · · Score: 1
      just call them song-name.music to imply that they are music.. i think that would probably catch on..

      Stop right there! I WANT different file types to have different extensions. I want to filter for them -- and I certainly don't want my 'JPEG's and 'BMP's both labled 'PIC's just because less tech folks would catch on.

      IMO, intentionally promoting one extension for multiple formats is WORSE than Microsoft's technique of hiding file extensions (resulting in people clicking the readme.txt.exe embedded in their emails). It'd also be hell to extension mapping.

      --
      "The girl makes Godot look punctual." -- Buffy
    4. Re:its pronounced as hog without the h by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... what about an extension to filesystems that allows for a "dummy descriptor". HFS on the Mac has metadata (or whatever the hell they call it) that lets the OS display filenames with NO extensions, but it still knows the type. It also looked to me like the Nautilus people were doing the same type of thing with MIME types.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  14. Video Games banned in Greece by SkulkCU · · Score: 3, Informative


    I've submitted that story... I can't imagine that others haven't. Maybe they think it's a joke?

    MSNBC article

    --
    .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
    1. Re:Video Games banned in Greece by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Are you referring to the ban mentioned in this Slashback?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:Video Games banned in Greece by SkulkCU · · Score: 2


      Ah, so it is. Thank you.

      I didn't remember seeing an article about it. I just assumed that a law against playing games would be worth a story - as opposed to "the gaming ban in Greece" in a Slashback.

      At any rate, I'll go away now.

      --
      .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
  15. battle is over, go home by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

    Some people don't use ethernet. Some won't use mp3. Making ogg vorbis and mp3 play nicely won't yank the thousands of diamond rios out of people's hands or get them to upgrade. As a practical matter mp3 is the de facto winner of this round of music standards, technical or legal merits notwithstanding. I don't have to like it, it just is.

    guac-foo

    1. Re:battle is over, go home by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Winner, what round. .ogg just reached 1.0 not to long ago. I personally want a player that plays .ogg, and won't buy one unless it does!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    2. Re:battle is over, go home by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1


      I've enjoyed having my MP3 player for a few years now. It's this new device that plays compressed digital music files. Oh? You want an ogg vorbis music player? Well, it's only almost 2003 -- keep waiting.

      Listen. I'm sympathetic. The next MP3 player (digital/compressed music player -- wait: GNU/digital/compressed music player) I purchase, I will look for o.v. compatibility. The device I have right now works just dandy, however.

      GF

    3. Re:battle is over, go home by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      I've got an mp3 player that is flashable. I will happily switch to OV as soon as I can. I have both formats now, and play vorbis via winamp with no real problems. But for the day you are correct.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    4. Re:battle is over, go home by spd_rcr · · Score: 1

      nice troll but i'll bite, i mean, hell, as a practical matter windows is the de facto winner of this round of operating systems technical or legal merits notwithstanding. i don't have to like it, it just is.

      fortuneatly, i don't have to run windows, i can run linux or freebsd. fortuneatly, my nex II is flash upgradeable, and according to tech support they're working on ogg vorbis support, so soon i won't have to be stuck w/ crappy old mp3s. variety & choice are nice, that's why i buy hardware that doesn't lock me in.

      --
      - tensions in our lives that are attacking our minds, unite themselves together to make our consciousness blind - op'ivy
  16. Clairvoyance by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow I just hate it when I see the future and then I go to slashdot and it's like I already read everything.

    I hate Deja Vu

  17. deja vu by Tellarin · · Score: 1


    oh my, not again!!!
    another glitch in the matrix?

  18. This comment is a dupe. by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 5, Funny

    This comment is a duplicate of another one in this thread. Why don't you posters read the other posts before hitting "submit"? ... While you're answering that question, I'll go get a soft drink. Ahh -- diet doctor pepper. Who would have thought they could improve on the original? But they did!

    1. Re:This comment is a dupe. by tunah · · Score: 2

      This comment is a duplicate of another one in this thread. Why don't you posters read the other posts before hitting "submit"? ... While you're answering that question, I'll go get a soft drink. Ahh -- diet doctor pepper. Who would have thought they could improve on the original? But they did!

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  19. For more details by eldimo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check yesterday discussion

  20. Realistic? by Spazholio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you get right down to it, MP3 is now a recognized and (mostly) accepted medium. Despite the fact that Ogg is a superior format, and open source to boot, I think it's going to be an uphill battle. Manufacturers aren't going to rush to develop for it, because there's always a fear of doing something new and innovative in a realm where there's already a clear and established niche. And people aren't going to want to get a portable Ogg player, because it's not what they're used to ("Ogg? What's that? A new virus?"). Not to mention ripping all their CDs AGAIN. And that's even assuming they owned them in the first place. If not (most likely), they'll be encoding from lossy to lossy. Most people I know aren't audiophiles, and only get 128, maybe 160 if it's available, so sound quality from a 128 MP3 to even a decent quality Ogg will be bad. It's a wicked circle, and it's a damned shame. I have a Zaurus, but it doesn't have NEARLY the battery life to double as a portable Ogg player. Here's to hoping someone in the portable music industry has some balls and decides to take a chance.

    1. Re:Realistic? by sporty · · Score: 2

      Two-words. Maybe one ;) -- Beta-max.

      No matter where ogg might go, mp3 has a foothold. There's a difference though. Using Ogg for your music collection is easy since the medium you rip from is the same as mp3. Most of my music collection I own. I don't get my mp3's from friends either. I just borrow their cd's. So using Ogg won't be hard. And being opensource, it'll stick around until something blows it and mp3 out of the water :) As for the hardware players, give it time, we'll have devices that support wma, mp3 AND ogg.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Realistic? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      Despite the fact that Ogg is a superior format

      From a hardware design standpoint, thats highly debateable, especially considering that until yesterday (or today if you didn't read /. yesterday) there wasn't a decoded that could work on non floating point processors. Portable Ogg players will never come close to beating mp3 players until they cost the same or less to produce.

    3. Re:Realistic? by Dionysus · · Score: 2

      WordPerfect doc format were a recognized and accepted medium. Lotus 1-2-3 doc format was a recognized and accepted medium. UNIX was a recognized and accepted high-end server. Things change, and so does defacto standards.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    4. Re:Realistic? by Jeremi · · Score: 2
      Two-words. Maybe one ;) -- Beta-max


      Nah, it's a completely different scenario, because it's cheap and easy to build an audio player that plays both mp3 and ogg. Compare that with the difficulty involved in building a VCR that plays both VHS and BetaMax.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:Realistic? by sporty · · Score: 2

      Two points to think about:

      Today it's cheap to build beta-max, no? So producers have a choice to sell onto customers.

      Plus, people who had the master copy of a video could choose beta-max or vhs. Unfortunately, copies available to the consumer market was usually vhs. With Ogg, mp3, wav, wma, we have the hardware already so we get to choose the format.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    6. Re:Realistic? by Baconator · · Score: 2

      A more realistic comparison might be to the current crop of DVD players, for example APEX players. Most of them play DVD, SVCD, CD, CD/R, and CD/RW, including MP3s on CDR. And they still only cost about $100 new. The reason is simply that for the cost of a little extra logic you can support lots of different (but similar) media.

      Digital music players are even easier. There's no physical carrier to worry about, so once you build a machine capable of playing MP3s, you already have the hardware to play WAV, OGG, WMA, VQF, whatever. The hardest part is the licensing, and since OGG is free, no biggie there.

    7. Re:Realistic? by sporty · · Score: 2

      That's very true.

      Well, here's the big question. Supplying that your encoding alg has become outdated, but you wanna use it, would you conform to popular opinion or stick with what you like? With Ogg, there's that choice since the software will be around forever. With beta-max, there isn't. :)

      Mp3 is in a similar position as ogg, except it has popularity.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    8. Re:Realistic? by Baconator · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose the simple answer is that you can go against popular standards, but ya gotta be prepared for the difficulties you'll face.

      For example, I store my digital music with lossless compression (formats like Shorten or FLAC). Hardly anyone does that, so obviously there is much less support for such things. But hey, what do I care? As long as there are a couple of good players out there, I'm gold. And, as it happens, there are XMMS plugins for both formats.

      Personally, I would like to see an environment where all the major media players support all the free codecs, and as many of the commercial ones as they care to. Let me have a mixed collection of OGGs, MP3s, WAVs, FLACs, etc., and don't make me worry too much about which is which.

    9. Re:Realistic? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      The point was, a videotape consumer in the '80s was willing to buy either a VHS recorder, or a Beta recorder, but not both. In the near future, consumers will be able to buy players that plays both .ogg and .mp3, for about the same price as an .mp3-only player. So there is little danger of .mp3 "crowding out" .ogg (or vice versa) the way VHS crowded out BetaMax.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Realistic? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      You don't work in a law office or a state legislature, do you?

      If not, then you probably don't realize that
      WordPerfect is still in widespread use.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Realistic? by sporty · · Score: 2

      More importantly, you can use the format without any hardware.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    12. Re:Realistic? by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      You can decode oggs in your head? Neat LAN party trick!

  21. Ogg Vorbis compatible MP3 by renehollan · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one that thinks this is analogous to frog-compatible fish?

    --
    You could've hired me.
  22. Simple decision by McCart42 · · Score: 2

    Well for me the choice is simple--if iRiver decides to make their players OGG compatible, then I'll buy one (I've certainly been drooling over it long enough)--if not, I'll stick with my Nomad II MG, which is none the worse for wear, considering it's going on 2 years old now.

    I am fairly sure that they will add support, considering how friendly the people at Xiph are being with offering help to put the format in their players...

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  23. this is old new... by bob@dB.org · · Score: 2

    this site already broke the story. the slashdot editors should check it out sometime...

    --
    Acts@core.mailboks.com Acrux@core.mailboks.com Adam@core.mailboks.com Adar@core.mailboks.com Ada@core.mailboks.com
  24. Repost from yesterday! by eldimo · · Score: 1

    This should really belong to moderators-are-you-reading-tour-own-website dept.

  25. Already... by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    have ogg hardware... called a laptop :) ... just wish I had more than 10GB total HD space

  26. Huh. by oval_pants · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think that this release was timed especially well, especially with the release of the much published MP3 "negative" and unfounded press? Right on the heels of that article the sarcastic response.

    Exceptionally paranoid or well played media match set?

  27. If it only came with a 3-button mouse ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    I figure at some point, iPods will get mentioned. Then OS X (Jaguar, roar!) and then someone would complain about the 1 button mouse (ignoring that whole "I can just use my own 3 button USB mouse and it will work right off the bat!" thing). I'm just getting it out of the way.

  28. Greece is old news by los+furtive · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was first mentioned way back on March 25th, and more recently in Slashback. Don't feel dumb though, I submitted the MSNBC story too but only later realized that it had been covered. Still, you'd think a place like Slashdot would give it a bit more press.

    I guess that's why it's 'news for geeks' and not 'news for greeks'

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    1. Re:Greece is old news by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2

      ...and considering that it had already been posted twice, it should have been a good candidate for timothy to select again.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  29. CNET == Old News ;) by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    CNET has a story announcing the release of Tremor.

    And Slashdot.org a top notch tech news site had the story yesterday. I wish that for once CNET would find their own content instead of always stealing it a couple days late from other news sites.

    1. Re:CNET == Old News ;) by MagusX · · Score: 2

      Stealing news a couple of days late? Isn't that the mission statement of Slashdot?

  30. No Risk by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

    As long as the hardware device continues to play MP3s there is little risk to the manufacturer. They'll pay no royalties to use either the format or the Tremor software, all they need is a tiny amount of extra space.

    Personally I am in the market for a portable Ogg player. In fact, I considered purchasing the Zaurus simply because it is the only portable device that I am aware of that plays Ogg files. However, I already have a PDA that I am happy with, and if I could get a less expensive gizmo that still played Ogg files I would snatch it up in an instant.

    In short, the Ogg format wouldn't cost much to support, and it might swing potential buyers towards your device instead of a competitor's player.

    1. Re:No Risk by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      In short, the Ogg format wouldn't cost much to support, and it might swing potential buyers towards your device instead of a competitor's player.

      Yeah, having the "Jesus beating the crap out of a snake" logo or the "rotating fish" logo on the box will certainly be a competitive advantage!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  31. Can I have a job... by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

    Seriously... you guys don't care anymore (the "editors"). We're getting repeats almost every day or at least every other day. If you guys aren't going to read slashdot anymore, then hell hire someone who can. Or maybe they'll do it volunteerly like you used to do in the old days. I don't want to bitch about slashdot. I like slashdot, always have in the roughly 2 years i've been on here. It just sucks to see the creators of something so damn cool stop caring. *sigh*

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    1. Re:Can I have a job... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      have one asshole.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    2. Re:Can I have a job... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      One? If you worked with some of my previous bosses you'd have more on the order of twenty or so.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  32. New Poll by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny
    What punishment should a slashdot editor receive for posting a duplicate story?

    • Stand in corner for 5 minutes - we want this on a webcam so we can see it!
    • A lashing with a wet noodle
    • Read all comments in the duplicate story (at -1 of course)
    • Install WindowsXP on unsupported hardware
    • Some lame CowboyNeal option
    1. Re:New Poll by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      Make him sit and upgrade a single machine from DOS to 3.1 to 95 to 98 to NT to 2000 to XP. That's about 8 hours of sheer "insert next disk" hell. :)

      evil...

    2. Re:New Poll by eMilkshake · · Score: 1

      Don't complain about the lack of options!

    3. Re:New Poll by swb · · Score: 2

      I think the parent poster meant "Win 3.1 to Win95" and not "Dos 3.1 to Win95". I did a Win 95A install on a full-install DOS 6.22 machine many moon ago; I was left with a dual-boot scenario, not specifically an OS upgrade.

      Other than that, I think the upgrade path he mentioned (Win 3.1, 95, 98, NT4, Win2k, XP) is actually possible on paper at least. It would probably be worthwhile to tack on Win ME in there someplace just for the sheer Sisyphean enjoyment.

      An equally annoying scenerio would be a series of Redhat upgrades, like from 4.x to whatever the current Redhat release is. The funny thing is I would have more faith in the Windows upgrades actually working.

    4. Re:New Poll by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      Yup yup it works... sometimes. It's kind of tricky to "upgrade" from DOS to Win 3.1, but doable. After that, it's all about sitting in front of your monitor and pressing the NEXT button several hundred times.

  33. Re:Ogg... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    How about Egg Orbit?

  34. Fantastic! by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

    Now I have more reason then ever to burn all of my mp3 to regular cd format then re-rip them into OGG-Vorbis. Lets see I have a little under 5 gigs of mp3's, so hmmm does anyone where I could buy a thousand cd spindle?

    1. Re:Fantastic! by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      I know you're probably kidding but anyway... It only takes 8, i had to do this before. Along with that the reripped oggs will probably be shittier quality because you're gonna lose quality going from wav to mp3 to wav to ogg.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    2. Re:Fantastic! by EdTheCzar · · Score: 1

      You sir, are an idiot. First, as many have already said, there are very, very many decoders for MP3 files. The general consensus is that the Lame boys have the best one. After that, you have your WAV files, and encoding is easy. The next reason you are an idiot is the 5GB's becomes about 7 CD's which would cost you as little as 50 cents, if you bought the CD's in a large pack.

  35. you really gotta love that BSD license by Drakonian · · Score: 1
    I know that everyone is down on the BSD and up on the GPL, but we owe a tremendous amount to the BSD license.. Companys (like microsoft) took up stuff like the TCP/IP stack, BIND, etc..

    and I believe OGG will achieved the same popularity and extension that it's other BSD Licensed bretheren enjoy. It's gotta be the freedom of the BSD license that encourages companys to pick up on this stuff, rather than re-inventing the wheel with yet another standard because they don't like a particular clause or so in the license.. Deja vu? This is a test to see if I'll get credit for yesterday's highest modded post. The real credit goes to TechnoVooDooDaddy.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  36. Serious Question by MisterBlister · · Score: 2, Redundant
    Do the editors read Slashdot, ever?

    I ask because I'm a fairly casual reader. I load up Slashdot every couple of days and scan the headlines. My total time spent 'Slashdotting' is maybe 20-25 minutes a week. Despite all of this, I am quite aware of the INSANE amount of story repeats that go on here. Say all you want about the fact that there are multiple editors and each might post without knowing what the other one did (even if it was the same day or the day before!!??), but if they spent only the limited amount of time I do actually reading (just the headlines even, not even user comments!) Slashdot, they'd see these obvious repeats... Wouldn't they? And if they can't be bothered to spend 20-25 minutes per week actually reading the site, then why the hell are they editors here?

    Just askin'. I mean, I slashdot for free so I don't feel the editors "owe" me anything, but I don't understand why they'd be so willing to make asses of themselves on such a widely known public site by not doing simple duplicate checking.

    1. Re:Serious Question by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      It's odd, because some stories get duped, while some relevant stories get blocked for fear of the RIAA lawyers.

      Well, considering it's free, we're still getting more than we pay for.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  37. Re:Dupe by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "Do the guys that work at Slashdot actually READ Slashdot?"

    Did the 4,000 people who commented on the dupe story read the comments?

  38. absolutely fantastic by balog · · Score: 1

    have the editors gone blind?

    repost after repost,
    have you guys stopped reading the site or what?

  39. Slashdot Repeat Idea by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    A couple ideas to think over.
    • Instead of just having moderator points, assign Operator rating points based on karma. This way, the boneheadedness (or admirability) of the operator can be determined.
    • When a news story is submitted, change slash to have an "Are you Sure" page, which would do a fulltext search to try and find matches within the past few days. This'll give them one more chance to see if the story is a dupe. If it's done, Operators won't have to actually READ Slashdot. Fancy that! More time to work on Everything2 articles!
    • If an Operator submits too many duplicate posts (Hi CmdrTaco!), make him strip down naked, and run through the streets with only a Plush Tux Penguin to hide his/her genetalia.
    • Make the HREF for the poster point to goatse.cx for two days whenever they post a dupe.
    • Give karma points for being a troll when responding to a duplicate article... Fringe Benefit: The Trolls will only come out from under their bridge when the Ops pull a boner.

    I'd love to hear thoughts on this.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  40. Let's take a poll... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    ... how many of you that posted observations about the dupe story actually thought you were the first to notice?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  41. I was going to post a "First Post" post by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    but since this is a duplicate story it really wouldnt be now would it?

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  42. Where to download encoder? by simetra · · Score: 2

    I was able to download and use an ogg encoder on my home pc, but can't find on one their site today. Can someone provide a valid url? Yes, I've checked their download pages. This would be for Win2000 Pro.
    Thanks, really, I mean that.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Where to download encoder? by EdTheCzar · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.vorbis.com/download_win.psp Get "vorbis-tools", located under the Encoders/ Jukeboxes header. The encoder itself is oggenc.exe, but included in the package is a number of other programs for using the encoder.

  43. Dupes are better than anti-open source articles? by doomdog · · Score: 1


    I guess so... The editors keep rejecting my article on how open source is hurting small software vendors -- and instead, they prefer to re-post the same drivel of "open source will save the world" that they post every day...

    Just like good little communists, slashot always manages to supress the alternate view...

  44. CNET? by tweakt · · Score: 2

    CNET has an article, and suddenly it's news all
    over again? What I'm wondering, is why are people
    submitting stories for third party articles about
    stories or events were already linked to from
    slashdot?

    Don't the submitters even look at the stories here
    anymore? Are people blindly submitting any new
    tech story on CNET, TheRegister, or Wired?

  45. Correction by Lindril · · Score: 1
    I recommend a revision to the article's originating department.

    Old:
    Posted by timothy on Wednesday September 04, @04:07PM
    from the iriver-are-you-listening dept.

    New:
    Posted by timothy on Wednesday September 04, @04:07PM
    from the timothy-are-you-reading dept.

  46. refund?! by kennedy · · Score: 1

    hey i think i'm entitled to be credited for the subscription page i wasted loading up this duplicate story.

    but i doubt that'll happen.

  47. Betamax? by steveha · · Score: 2
    Not a useful comparison. VHS beat Betamax for several reasons:

    Betamax VCRs cost more. Many companies made VHS VCRs, and competition drove prices down, while only Sony made Betamax.

    VHS allowed 6 hours of recording per tape, and consumers considered the quality adequate. Betamax had better quality, but much less time per tape (under 2 hours, IIRC).

    VHS VCRs could not easily be made that would play Betamax tapes. Choosing VHS meant not choosing Betamax.

    Now let's compare Ogg Vorbis and MP3:

    MP3 costs money, and Ogg never does. "More expensive" will not apply to Ogg ever.

    Ogg can fit as much music, or more, as MP3 into a similar space. Yet Ogg has the better quality. (Consumers consider MP3 quality to be adequate, though.) This one is a wash.

    Players can be easily made that will play either MP3 or Ogg. When Ogg players are available, buying one will not mean choosing not to be able to play MP3s; and consumers might buy a player wanting to use it for MP3s, and wind up using it for Ogg.

    So I don't think the Betamax comparison is all that useful.

    It will cost engineering time and testing time to add Ogg to players, but it will not cost any licensing fees. It isn't free to add Ogg to a player, but it's darn close, and Ogg adds nothing to the all-important "cost of goods". Given this, it is inevitable that at least some players will be available that will do Ogg.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Betamax? by sporty · · Score: 2

      My point isn't why beta-max isn't used nor if ogg will never see players. It's more of ogg being in a similar position as beta-max. None-the-less, I believe the outcome will be different. It will be more of a cult thing that will stick around for a long time vs beta-max.

      Two points you bring up which are relevant to why ogg will stick around at least as a cult thing:

      You say mp3 costs money. I've never paid for winamp or iTunes. Neither will ogg. It's a popularity race in that case. Will I use ogg to encode? I doubt it, I like my mp3 collection. Space is cheap. My time isn't ;)

      You bring up quality. Ogg may or may not have a better audio quality. I can encode with mp3 to match ogg, just at different bitrates to make them sound mostly alike. With betamax, we had no choice since it never hit the consumer... much if at all. We were spoonfed.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Betamax? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "Betamax VCRs cost more."

      You gave other reasons, but, speaking as someone
      who was there at the time, I feel compelled to
      point out that this was *THE* reason.

      Beta cost a *LOT* more. VHS recorders went from
      almost affordable to essential very, very quickly.
      Beta was always expensive, and only really made sense if you were into buying a camera.

      It looked to me as if Sony bet the farm on the idea that people would be into making their own movies, that replacing super-8 was the killer app. But the real killer app was taping tv shows. Home video was secondary, and super8 was
      already dead because it was starting to cost too
      much. The last 8mm film I made cost $2.75 PER MINUTE to process, in 1977, and about that much to buy the film. 20 minutes was considered a lengthy home movie. But the whome home movie fad had pretty much faded away before vcr's hit the scene. It was taping movies off cable, and also movie rentals, that drove the sales of the VCR.

      And the customers in the electronics stores had a choice. And they bought the one that was cheaper.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Betamax? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      You may not be paying for winamp or iTunes, the companies that provide the software did or may have to do in the future. No issue with Ogg.

      I have no MP3 collection, not for lack of CDs (my collection includes around 200 CDs) but because MP3 licensing was bound to be an issue. I did not want to build a collection around something that would probe troublesome in the future.

      As soon as the first Ogg players appear then I can do my collection with the confidence that I am the owner of the data and that I will never face patent bullshit when the only thing I want is to listen to my own music using the means of my liking.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    4. Re:Betamax? by sporty · · Score: 2

      What about all of the GPL players that don't use the patents? They won't ever go away, so why not stick with mp3's?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  48. Re:Dupe by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Did the 4,000 people who commented on the dupe story read the comments?


    The more that we express our displeasure with the obvious fact that the editors don't care, the more likely they are to start paying attention. At this point, with there being generally a repeat every day, the number of complaints often outweighs the number of comments on the subject. I keep hoping that someday one of the "editors" will look at the comments and realize that there's a problem. (Of course, maybe they really don't care that thousands of people think that they're lazy idiots because they can't even glance at the front page before posting a story.)


    The fact that the stories repeat isn't so bad in itself, but it's a symtom of the bigger problem that the editors simply don't care about slashdot. Until they either start working, or get a clue and step down, they deserve all the derision we can heap on them.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  49. check the Older Stuff box in your preferences by Mr.+Daemon · · Score: 1

    Hey slashdot editors, how about marking that checkbox in your own preferences and try to read it before posting stuff?

    that's two duplicates in two days you could've avoid by doing that...

  50. oggdropxpd by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I was able to download and use an ogg encoder on my home pc, but can't find on one their site today. Can someone provide a valid url?

    I use OggDropXPd.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  51. Portable GPL language learning! by retostamm · · Score: 1

    With a .ogg enabled iPod and LingoTeach you could make custom language .oggs files (like, replace those expensive language learning tapes) and listen to them on the way to wherever!

  52. Floppy Disk... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    I remember hearing the same thing about Floppy Disks. Every computer has a 5 1/4 drive, why spend money on a 3 1/2 ?

    If the people get something better, they will Switch(TM) eventually. Long live Ogg.

  53. ogg on WinMX by yerricde · · Score: 2

    It will NEVER have hardware support

    The freeing of Tremor should change that.

    cause it has a stupid name

    Is "em-pee-three" any better?

    Not to mention have you EVER seen an OGG on KaZaA Lite, WinMX or eDonkey?

    I have seen .ogg files on WinMX. The main reason you don't is that WinMX by default shares only files named "*.mp3".

    By the time anyone ever takes OGG seriously, the patent for MP3 will have expired

    Not if Unisys, Thomson, Lilly, and Pfizer get together and lobby for a Cherilyn Lapierre Patent Term Extension Act.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  54. Clairvoyance by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Wow I just hate it when I see the future and then I go to slashdot and it's like I already read everything.

    I hate Deja Vu

  55. Re:Dupe by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I doubt that's really why people are posting the obvious. I think it's karma whoring, personally. Half-assed attempts at +1 Funny's and so on.

    If you really want to complain, send an email to the Slashdot staff. If an article drives 400 comments, then 400 people have seen the ads. Think about it. You'll just encourage errors to happen.

    Personally, I think the real reason that not much attention is paid to spelling is that it drives the eyeballs up. (that and it's hard to be nice to people who are impolite about it.)

  56. Some revisions to make it meaningful by swb · · Score: 2
    • Stand in corner facing life-size printout of the Goatse.cx image.
    • Lashing with wet towel, rat-tail style
    • Post at -1 for one month
    • Support Windows XP at Stumblefuck, Alabama call center for one month
    • Blow Cowboy Neal
    All of the above should take place on webcam and best stills should be interspersed with the normal banner ads.
  57. Re:Has anyone *heard* Tremor? by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

    This is the same non-FPU decoder that has been in use on the Sharp Zaurus handheld from TheKompany.

    It was coded by the author of Vorbis with assembler for ARM processors.

    I think it'll work. ;)

    --
    -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
  58. Re:What is ogg vorbis? by Luke+Skyewalker · · Score: 1

    ogg vorbis is a new compression technique that rivals that of mp3 and wma. unlike mp3 and wma, however, ogg vorbis has been patented under the gpl, which will allow developer, manufacturers, and end users to avoid the licensing fees normally associated with compression/encoding technologies.

    ogg vorbis is less lossy of a format than that of mp3, and it also has been shown to yield an output file 10 - 17% smaller than that of mp3 and wma, without significant loss of fidelity.

  59. Someone thinking ogg support in iPod by superangrybrit · · Score: 1

    Then add radio tuner. After that it's perfect :)

  60. Whats the deal with floating point? by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, whats so tough about doing floating point math that these devices can't do it? It isn't difficult to see that floating point operations dont have to be so special.

    I dont see why hardware needs to recognize floating points at all. Look at the following example.

    4.5 + 0.5
    0100.1000
    + 0000.1000
    -----------
    0101.0000

    The only thing to handle is that the fractional part of the value must be converted from its decimal to the binary by the ratio of 16/10. Multiply the "binimal" by 16 and then divide by 10.

    whats so difficult about that? At the least, these float-less processors could include support for floats in their compilers can then just do the conversions in software. Tough, tough, a whole 3 or 4 instructions!

    1. Re:Whats the deal with floating point? by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative
      Your example is of fixed point addition.

      Educate yourself a bit:

      Floating Point Tutorial

      Even Microsoft can help.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Whats the deal with floating point? by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the help and sorry for the ignorance. But, still, it wouldn't be that difficult to have a compiler build floating-point operation code that runs on processors that don't support it. Yes, it would be slower, but it would still work.

  61. you burned your MP3s to encode them?!?! by Jerf · · Score: 2

    You actually burned your MP3s back to CD to convert them to OGG?!??!? Convert to wav and then re-encode directly, or find an encoder that can read MP3 directly, like lame!

    This works better even if you think you have space issues, because most rippers copy the whole CD to the hard drive to rip (650MB). A quick shell script would allow you to convert MP3->wav->OGG one at a time, requiring only enough extra space to hold your biggest file as MP3, WAV, and OGG all at once.

  62. Bad name by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The person who wrote in raises a good point--the name hurts Ogg. MP3 is a good name--it's simple (short), easy to say, easy to type, and catchy. Ogg Vorbis is none of those. I'd personally like to see a new name for Ogg.

    1. Re:Bad name by Yosho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, "Ogg Vorbis" is more complex than "MP3." And "MPEG Layer 3" as much more complex than "Ogg." What's your point?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    2. Re:Bad name by blueroo · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's so difficult to remember or say about "Ogg". Heck, Ogg and Ug were the vocabulary staples of the cavemen. If it was good enough for cavemen, its good enough for you!

    3. Re:Bad name by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      Say "Vorbis" then. That sounds good, and that is the name of the Sound encoding.. Ogg is the group of media products.

      Compare with Real[Video|Audio]..

  63. Re:Dupe by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Well, as far as advertising goes -- I recommend that anyone that dislikes the attitude of the slashdot staff block the advertisements. (I just turn off images when coming to slashdot, though of course there are better ways of doing it.) If they're going to treat the slashdot readers as mindless consumers, I'm certainly not going to waste my bandwidth in order to help them make a profit. They've done nothing to earn my loyalty.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  64. Need a new icon for "duplicate story" by gosand · · Score: 2

    This seems to be happening more recently, but at least the editors are admitting it. Maybe it is time for a "duplicate story" category and icon.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  65. Do your job. by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

    Come on folks. This repeat bullshit is crap.

  66. Are you on crack? by Inoshiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's only a "bad name" because no one recognizes it. Go back to 1997 and try saying MP3 to people in the street -- they'll give you funny looks.

    As for your lies about how "hard" it is to type, yeesh, try counting it. 2 unique keypresses using 2 fingers (with one repeat motion) vs. 3 on 3 separate fingers ends up being the same -- 3 motions.

    Maybe the name doesn't make sense to people who can't count, but for the rest of us, we'll keep using it.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Are you on crack? by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Wow, do you have some personal stake in the name? I didn't mean to upset you so much, bottomline is unless you designed the name and have emotions caught up in it, this shouldn't be a debate that brings out such harsh emotions.. Let's take it calmly.

      My point is simple and you didn't address it. MP3 -- letter M, letter P, number 3. em-pee-3. Instantly recognizble. Ogg Vorbis. What the hell is that? Ogg well that's not a word..Vorbis? That's not a word either. It's just a string of nonsense syllables. Sure, plenty of names are, but this one isn't particularly snappy (to my ear, or my friends at least, sorry if you disagree) and isn't even typical of english phoneme arrangment.

      Incidentally, mp3 is so much easier to type that ogg vorbis--3 characters versus two words with a space.

    2. Re:Are you on crack? by frause · · Score: 1

      So 'MPEG 1, layer 3' is easier to type than 'Ogg Vorbis'? Since when?

      >Incidentally, mp3 is so much easier to type that ogg vorbis--3 characters versus two words with a space.

  67. Handheld ape players? by joesknnr · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT.. anyone know of .ape compatible players now or in the near future?

    --
    "Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards." -Aldous Huxley
  68. Re:Dupe by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    " If they're going to treat the slashdot readers as mindless consumers, I'm certainly not going to waste my bandwidth in order to help them make a profit"

    Replying to my post didn't do anything to help that. It's another comment, therefore more participation in the thread. You should be emalling them about it, not me.

    "They've done nothing to earn my loyalty."

    Is loyalty really an issue here? It's not like you're paying anything to view the news.

    "I recommend that anyone that dislikes the attitude of the slashdot staff block the advertisements."

    0 effect. Don't like when Slashdot does something? Complain directly to the editors so they know what the problem is. I seriously doubt they're paying a whole lot of attention to the comments. I wouldn't. People who complain about /. in the least tactful way. Blocking the ads will only lower /.'s ability to get money, which could lead to shutdown of the site. If all you want is a minor fix, then you're going about it in the least direct and most painful way.

  69. Re:Ogg... by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

    Or Oof Vommit?

    or how about o99 v04b15? Make it l337 like mp3.

    If you wanna find out what OGG means, just catch this football and stand there.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  70. Real conversation at Slashdot HQ! by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 1

    Slashdot Mod 1: "Oh damn! We're running out of news stories for Slashdot because none of the submissions are up to scratch. What will we do??"

    Slashdot Mod 2: "I know, lets repost a story from yesterday!"

    Slashdot Mod 1: "Sounds like a great idea! If anyone starts asking questions, lets just call it an accident, that'll keep those slashdotters busy!"

    Slashdot Mod 2: "Perfect! Now, where are my donuts?"

  71. Is it just me? by deek · · Score: 1


    Or does the slashdot crowd appear to be one of the most unforgiving groups on a news discussion board?

    For heavens sake, it's just a duplicate article!! Timothy's apologised, and recognised his mistake. Just accept that and move on, people!

    Reading the "outrage" from this article, you'd think that this was a crime akin to mass murder. Geez! The guy is just human. Cut him some slack!

    I love reading Slashdot every day, and I really appreciate it. I also think that tech people are one of the nicest groups on the planet. Please don't change my opinion.

    DeeK

    1. Re:Is it just me? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      This phenomenon can be attributed to massive communal angst from having our story submissions rejected. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Is it just me? by deek · · Score: 1

      Most of us have jobs that involve much more difficult tasks than updating a web page with a blurp and a link several times a day. If we were too lazy to do something as simple as run a search before posting a story, it's highly likely we'd be at SERIOUS risk for losing our jobs.


      And it's exactly this elitest attitude that really annoys me. Since I assume you're not a Slashdot editor, I'm going to assume you have very little idea of the work involved. In other words, you're talking out of your arse.

      Horses for courses, Mr. Anonymous Coward. You can't compare a job posting news stories, to a job that is a little more sensitive (i.e handling credit card numbers).

      I'm not saying that you shouldn't point out Tim's mistake. Something like "Hey Timothy, this one's a duplicate, buddy" ... says what you need, without inferring that the editor is the reincarnation of the devil. Just please don't jump up and down in a rampage, declaring that "my life has been ruined because Timothy has posted a duplicate story".

      DeeK
  72. Re:Dupe by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I have. Others have too. However, it doesn't make any difference. On the other hand, if slashdot can't earn any money, their jobs are suddenly at stake. That might be enough to make them do something.


    The reason why compaining in the comments is important is because it lets everyone -- not just the editors -- see the complaints. If everyone just stuck to e-mail, then they could just claim, "Not too many people are bothered; we don't need to do anything." (If you don't believe they'd do that, recall their response to page-widening.)

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  73. Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    If this lame name whinging is the best Ogg's detractors can do then it should go like gangbusters. Incidentally, the audio codec is simply Vorbis. Ogg is a container format like Quicktime. In time we will be able to speak of Ogg Theora and in lotsa time Ogg Tarkin. If I'm not totally mistaken it can contain the Speex speech compression codec as well.

    The name whinging is really lame. Kleenex most certainly "isn't a word". The name certainly doesn't make me think "something to blow my excess snot into". It ACQUIRED that meaning. Think about it.

    1. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      What makes me a detractor? I comment soley on the name (I made no mention of the obvious technical merit [well, maybe not so obvious when compared to next generation codecs]) which I think is lame and a bad thing for the projects success.

      Think about the word kleenex--think of the first phoneme. Also, please reread the last sentence of my second paragraph, a point which you clearly missed.

    2. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      If this lame name whinging is the best Ogg's detractors can do then it should go like gangbusters. Incidentally, the audio codec is simply Vorbis. Ogg is a container format like Quicktime.

      Well said. I just call it "ogg", and that to me sounds... compressed.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by horza · · Score: 2

      If this lame name whinging is the best Ogg's detractors can do then it should go like gangbusters.

      You misunderstand... it's the Ogg advocates that are frustrated when they think something so great is being held back by something so simple as an unattractive name (and unfortunately these things DO make a difference). MP3 is not a great name, but it rode on the back of the well known standard MPEG. Again, I would like to see "MP5" as an alias for Ogg :-)

      The name whinging is really lame.

      I disagree, I think you underestimate the effect something as simple as a name can have on Joe Public (ie non-techies)

      Phillip.

    4. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by radish · · Score: 2

      Hoover
      Fanta
      Coca Cola
      McDonalds
      Disney
      Mars
      Pepsi
      Compaq
      Matr ox
      Shell
      Texaco
      Nike
      Adidas
      Reebok
      Sony

      These are all globally recognised brands (OK so some of them are domain specific, others are not). Most of them are made up words, some are random names of unrelated things (Reebok, Mars, Shell etc). None of them (to my mind) indicate anything about what they represent, has this stopped any of them becoming popular? No. Case closed.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      I say again (quote) "Also, please reread the last sentence of my second paragraph, a point which you clearly missed" and clearly missed again.

      Secondly, examine those names in your list--most are two syllable. And mant of them are actually pre-existing words. None of them have spaces (coke has a dash). I never said a name had to represent what they are either.

    6. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by radish · · Score: 2


      Yawn.

      You say it doesn't sound like an english word. I disagree, "Ogg" sounds a lot like "bog" or "fog" or "cog". "Vorbis"? Not a million miles from "morbid", "anxious", "compass". I'm not trying to be an english scholar, but hey, this is a really stupid argument, so what the hell.

      Besides, lets look back at my examples - it's my guess that "McDonalds" isn't typical of a Chinese word, does that stop it being recognised and used by chinese speakers? Nope. English isn't the only language in the world.

      I never said a name had to represent what they are either.
      err...

      Ogg Vorbis. What the hell is that? Ogg well that's not a word..Vorbis? That's not a word either. It's just a string of nonsense syllables


      I think most people (myself included) take this to mean that you want Ogg Vorbis to mean something to people who have never heard of it before. It doesn't. Neither does Coca Cola. That is my point. Any word is "just a string of nonsense syllables" until it is taken to mean something and introduced into the language. I mean Linux, what the hell is that? Just a string of nonsense syllables.

      And as for your stuff about syllables, I think the main problem you have is again one of understanding where mp3 comes from. It's actual name is "MPEG-1 Layer 3", but that's a mouthful, so people refer to it by mp3, which was the file extension. Guess what? I bet people will start calling Ogg Vorbis "ogg" or "vorb" or something like that. If a name is too long people will abbreviate it, or come up with an common alternative, they will NOT completely eschew the thing this name refers to. McDonalds have a product called a "Quarter Pounder with Cheese" - that's a longass name. Their staff have to say it a lot during the day. Do they pretend the product does not exist, do their customers refuse to buy it? No. But some of them use an abbreviation (like "QPC").

      Anyway I'm nored of this. What it boils down to is you don't like the name. So go and write your own codec and call it whatever the hell you like.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Vorbis doesn't have much to worry about. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Wow, what a pedantic response. I really appreciate you using a line-item understanding on what I say.

  74. I am ready to buy an Ogg Vorbis player by lingenfr · · Score: 1

    Yes I have read the commentary. Let me be specific. I would purchase an Ogg Vorbis only player (not MP3). I think that when manufacturers see that there is a market for open source based products, there will be a better selection. Further, when patent holders see a significant decrease in revenue, maybe they will pull their heads out of their fourth point of contact. I am planning to email a couple of my favorite hardware vendors and lobby. I would suggest that like-minded individuals do the same.

    It is so disappointing to have to page through off-topic, redundant crap (i.e. Hey dude, this story is a duplicate) in order to get to some discussion about the topic. A year or so ago, you could browse at +1 or +2 and rise above the toilet rim, but now, the manure rises as high as +4. I think that /. better increase the number of ads because this baloney is cutting my visits from daily to weekly. The current metamoderation system does not weed out for those who overrate. Oh well...

  75. Re:Okay Timothy... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

    It was the first one I saw at score 1. Still was after the sickeningly long time it took to bang out on my new dvorak and submit.

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  76. CNET.. research? by rsax · · Score: 1
    Ogg Vorbis does not use patented technology, allowing it to be offered under an open-source license. This means that developers can have free access to the software and its original source code and can modify and redistribute the software, as long as any modifications are returned to the community.

    *insert game show buzzer sound here*

    Wrong! Gotta love how anything opensource automatically implies a GPL-like license now. Unless the author was referring to other parts of the Ogg Vorbis suite which aren't released under the BSD license, but I doubt it since the article mentions hardware players, ie. Tremor.

  77. Re:Realistic? - see frontier labs - nexII by spd_rcr · · Score: 1

    to quote my most recent email back from them, they're definately looking into adding ogg support to the players, and i know that the flash upgradeable firmware was one of my big decision makers when purchasing it.
    that 'n' the standard cf slot, & aa batteries

    --
    - tensions in our lives that are attacking our minds, unite themselves together to make our consciousness blind - op'ivy
  78. RIAA For the UK? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    I listen to mp3 radio, Digital Trance/Techno from the UK, alot of stuff you cant find on tv/radio. I have to order the cd's for the mixes, but you can find unknown mixes on gnutella (if popular)..

    I wonder, since I'm buying imported music, does the RIAA still make money off it? Are there main guntella connections for the UK?

    And speaking on encoding, I love how an Ogg Vorbis encoded cd has no skips between the tracks, really annoying with mp3s.

  79. Enough Duplicates! by Bytenik · · Score: 1

    Is it really too much to ask that the editors of /. take 5 minutes each day to at least give a cursory glance over the headlines of the last day or so? It greatly reduces your credibility.

    BTW, I realize that this comment is somewhat of a duplicate of other comments, but since I'm not an editor, I'll side-step any potential hypocrisy.

    --

    "Scientists prove we were never here."
    -- Devo

  80. Bullshit.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Several of the players out there (Sony is particularly guilty of this) are using other even more propietary formats and most people do not notice the difference.

    Most players can play at least another format along MP3. New players could play both MP3 and Ogg with view to acustom their customers to the new format before dumping MP3 for good.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  81. UNIX *was* ....???? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You don't know what you are talking about.... at least regarding UNIX....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  82. Re:Ogg Vorbis? by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Fag smoker. That's actually appealing? Maybe if you are gay, but if you're straight (and you live outside of England) you wouldn't want to call yourself that. I think smokes became popular because they have addictive additives put into them.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  83. Compatible players? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

    ....and could herald the rise of Ogg Vorbis compatible MP3 players.

    How about...

    ....and could herald the rist of MP3 compatible Ogg Vorbis players.

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  84. Dupe? by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    So is the other one, but I dont see any bloody warning there...

  85. Why should we corner ourselves? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Patents eventually bite.

    Now that all these technologies are in their infancy it is the time to promote standards that are good for most people.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.