Slashdot Mirror


ATi's All In Wonder Radeon 9700 Pro

FlippedBit writes "ATi has taken the wraps off their latest Swiss Army Knife 3D Graphics Card with TV Tuner and Remote Control capabilities, that rival most discrete solutions. The All In Wonder Radeon 9700Pro packs a ton of A/V features and is driven by their new R300 VPU. HotHardware has a look at this new beast and all its bells and whistles, right here."

250 comments

  1. So where's the Mac version? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to sound like a whiner, but this card would be perfect on my Mac. Between my game reviews, this would do it all - render by OS X games great, for my console reviews I could plug the svideo cables in for screenshot captures right to Quicktime/iMovie video.

    At the moment I ue a Formac Tevion, which works well through the Firewire, but as someone who believes that less hardware is better, ATI should really think about making a Mac version of this card. I can't imagine it would be all that hard - the hardware is AGP on both platforms, so it would just be someone at ATI writing some OS X drivers for this device.

    Not sure if anyone else cares about this, but I've been annoyed by ATI's lack of good video capture tools on the Mac since - well, since I started using Mac's in February of this year.

    1. Re:So where's the Mac version? by FaasNat · · Score: 1

      I myself would like to see a Mac version. However, ATI may still be a little salty after they were replaced as the default video card by nVidia back after that MacWorld fiasco where they "leaked" info on new Macs before Steve Jobs' keynote.

      --
      There's never enough when you have too little
    2. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Your right, this card is Perfect for the MAC. ATI seems to write better MAC drivers than Windows. I'm seeing alot of bugs on websites for the 9700 and games. It looks like the new patches/files coming out, most are for the 9700.

      I was hoping ATI would get the drivers in order for the release. My friends who bought the 9700's, loved the speed with AA, but some games (UT2K3 Demo has problems, fixed with the newest patch..)

      But what I really want for video in, is a divx/mpg4 capture device (card or firewire).
      -

      Bernie Ebbers, the former chief executive of WorldCom, and four other telecoms executives who allegedly made a total of $28.2m (£18m) by "profiteering" in hot initial public offerings were sued last night by New York state.

    3. Re:So where's the Mac version? by benh57 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, you're in luck. (maybe). According to Think Secret, ATI is developing an All-In-Wonder card for the mac.

    4. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Bakafish · · Score: 1

      The Mac version will come in a few months. My question is where is why doesn't some manufacturer take advantage of the chipsets in these cards (ATI and nVidia) and make a DTV tuner. I'm sitting here with a $3500 HDTV LCD Display and a nVidia GeForce 4 Ti and the best I can get is a crummy USB MPEG-1 TV tuner... WTF?

    5. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell is wrong with the moderators? this is obviously +2.5 Sarcastic.

    6. Re:So where's the Mac version? by 109+97+116+116 · · Score: 1

      I thought Mac's did all that already...

      At least that's what Apple's marketing led me to believe.

      Hmm... Must be like MicroSoft's Windows Movie Maker... Just doesn't quite cut the mustard.

    7. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate to sound like a whiner

      It's alright. Most Mac users are whiners.

    8. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What about flashing the ROM of a PC ATi Card? Does anyone know how to do this? It used to work on PC Voodoo cards...PCI versions would be especially cool. I'm looking for a second video card, natch...

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    9. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Yeah, it had to be because steve jobs is a petulant child-- it couldn't be because NVIDIA wanted the business and made it worth Apple's while, or because NVIDIA is shipping better products (A lead that changes periodically,) or any other of a dozen business reasons. No, it couldn't have been that.

      It must be becuase steve jobs is a petulant child and was mad that ATI mentioned the iMac 1 day before it was released.

      Yeah, that must be it.

      Just because so many kiddies online are so emotional about things, steve jobs must be super sensitive as well. Yeah, thats it. Like he really cares about that kind of crap.

      What he DOES care about is quality products, and if anything, THAT was the reason Apple switched to NVIDIA.

      Sheesh. Why do people believe such rumors?

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    10. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2



      Why don't you get a Firewire DV bridge? Granted they don't support HDTV, but the DV format represents SD rather well. The formac studio dv/tv has a tuner built in, and cheaper products take composite and SVideo.

      I have it on good authority that there will be a software PVR to make use of such devices soon enough....

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    11. Re:So where's the Mac version? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      You want to complain about lack of ATI tools on Mac??? Tell you what, come over to FreeBSD, and see the utter lack of a single option... See ATI video cards with TV/SVideo out capabilities that go totally unused...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Whoop-D · · Score: 1

      re: drivers for Mac being better than Windows...I have to concur with you there. I have a couple dual Athlon Windows boxes with RADEON 8500s and even with the latest drivers they don't run OGL apps anywhere as good as my older Thunderbird box with a GeForce2GTS. The 8500's 3D performance wipes the floor with the GeForce2GTS, for shaded and wireframe previews. But the ATI drivers don't handle the overlay planes of my app's GUI well at all. I've read that their workstation class RADEON has similar driver issues running workstation class apps, relative to NVIDIA hardware. Quake performance kicks ass...but that was just supposed to be a side benefit. I'll most likely upgrade these boxes to NVIDIA hardware as soon as I can. My Mac, however, has shown little problems with its ATI hardware. I've got an older B&W G3 that I've upgraded with a 500mHz G4 and RADEON and it works great. DVD and Quicktime performance much better than my faster Athlon with the GeForce2GTS.

      --
      "This is your life, good to the last drop. It doesn't get any better then this." --Tyler Durden
    13. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't that the joy of a `free` OS ?
      getting deep n dirty with the kernal...

      Ah..
      I use windows I must be a lamer...

    14. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when are the the cp/m drivers coming out.

      it's ridiculous I can't plug my spanking new card into my amstrad word processor...

      whats that? I didn't check it was compatible with my pc...

    15. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you're right about the ATi drivers, but it should also be noted that the nVidia Mac drivers are definitely flaky by comparison. I've lost count of the times my GeForce 2MX equipped Mac has whinged about not having enough memory for OGL, and how perfectly my Radeon equipped machine behaves in comparison. Simple solution, Apple should offer both the 9700Pro and the AIW as BTO options with Apple sanctioned and maintained drivers. With VPU/GPU units contributing so much to system performance now, it's a straightforward way to boost the performance of the Mac platform.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    16. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      no no, that's WINNERS

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    17. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're preachin' to the chior on that count. ATI has been very solid in their development of MAC display cards, but for reasons unknown to me, they have yet to release a video capture solution that works well for the MAC. (IMO)
      Some may say that they haven't really come out with a good solution for the pc either, not with all their funky drivers. . .

    18. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love DRM , too !!!
      And also Palladium !!!

    19. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They`re certainly winning the `who paid the most for rebadged, standard computer parts` prize!

      It IS a rather nice shade of blue though, and of course that is very important.

    20. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is?

    21. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      Never mind the Mac version, where's the Linux version? The list of included software sounded suspiciously Windowsy. Will there be free drivers for this card?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    22. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that these various unices don't come out with an Open Source DirectX Video Driver wrapper or wrapper and relinking scheme. Man that would solve a lot of problems, speed may not be completely up to par, but at least you'd get functionality.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    23. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah, Steve Jobs has never acted like a petulant child before, so why would he now?

      >Just because so many kiddies online are so emotional about things

      I'm sure not when it comes to Apple. I don't use one, and never plan to if the company continues its hard-line "PC is crap, but we'll develop for it anyways" stance. It just seems so incorrect and wrong. Perhaps that's just me getting emotional, though.

      >steve jobs must be super sensitive as well.

      There was a PBS special explaining that he does have an emotional problem of some sort... Or so it would appears. I think it was called "Geeks" or "Nerds" 1.0.

      >What he DOES care about is quality products

      Ask a G4 cube owner about that...

      >Why do people believe such rumors?

      Because Apple said it best themselves: They "think different." ie: They don't follow common business sense all that well, just well enough to (sort of) survive.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    24. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that to most OEM versions of the Radeon 8500. It's not the ROMS that are the problem, it's the drivers and the software.

    25. Re:So where's the Mac version? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine it would be all that hard - the hardware is AGP on both platforms, so it would just be someone at ATI writing some OS X drivers for this device.

      HA HA HA HA HA HA!

      Oh, that's rich, suggesting that ATI would make an effort to provide drivers for anyone beyond the greatest common denominator!

    26. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Yeah that was flamebait. Why is it people think they can just make up whatever crap they want about apple and people will believe it?

      Oh yeah, because there's a lot of bigots out there who will.

      You cant even remember the show, and what steve said was "Mcirosoft, just doesn't have a sense of style" Nothing about him having en emotional problem.

      The G4 Cube had no quality problems that I've ever heard of-- in fact, people who have one love them. They're quite a following. Unforutnately it didn't sell well, but that says nothing about its quality, just its popularity.

      ARe you really so stupid you believe what you're shovelling?

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    27. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Damn, even your references suck. Both point to articls about Steve Jobs getting apple back on track financially. Nothing about being a petulant child at all.

      But then, something tells me you're of the group who will spend twice as much money on a machine that performs half as well as a macintosh and think that you got a better deal on a faster machine. You're irrational to begin with.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    28. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Why is it people think they can just make up whatever crap they want about apple and people will believe it?

      I didn't author any of those links. Sorry you seem to think the entire world is against you (including PBS).

      >The G4 Cube had no quality problems that I've ever heard of

      Please search the web a little, and/or read more magazines, or talk to more people. Your choice.

      I'll provide you with some G4 Cube problem links:

      One
      Two
      Three - Admittance from Steve Jobs himself that G4 Cubes don't have the quality users expect from Apple
      Four
      Five

      And so on. It doesn't matter if they were cracks or mold lines -- either way they show a lack of quality assurance. If this were my car and Apple said "Oh, those ripples on the bodywork are just caused by the type of paint we used" I'd still say it stinks.

      >ARe you really so stupid you believe what you're shovelling?

      Are you so blinded by your mac fanatacism that you can't admit Apple could have made mistakes in its engineering of the G4 Cube?

      >You cant even remember the show, and what steve said was "Mcirosoft, just doesn't have a sense of style"

      You can't remember the part where he ignores Woz, his partner, for the company. A total lack of sympathy is an emotional problem, IMHO.

      Not to mention the Newton thing -- what's your excuse for that? Or did you skip over it because you have no answer and are again blinded by Mac zealotry?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    29. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Both point to articls about Steve Jobs getting apple back on track financially.

      But the company ISN'T on track financially. They're on Microsoft (R) brand life support.

      Jobs dumped the Newton as a bitch-slap, and up to now I see no evidence to prove otherwise.

      Apple only exists because of Microsoft and Artists. And if Microsoft goes, I strongly doubt the Artists are going to pony up enough to keep those Macs coming.

      >But then, something tells me you're of the group who will spend twice as much money on a machine that performs half as well as a macintosh and think that you got a better deal on a faster machine.

      My fastest machine is a 1 Ghz Celeron laptop with CD-RW/DVD, 256 Mb RAM, 1400x1050 screen, 30 GB HDD, sound, firewire, NTSC video out, Li-Ion battery, and it's only 5.2 lbs. It included works, win xp, StudioDV, encyclopedia, money, and lots of other software goodies.

      Was there a laptop Mac that could reach that level of performance, features, and software (similar is fine -- I don't care who makes it, I just want the same function) for only $2,599 CDN in December 2001 (when I purchased the laptop)? In fact, since you accuse me of spending twice as much, you'll need to find me one for $1,300 CDN. Feel free to use xe.net to convert the prices to your home currency. I'd be very interested in the answer.

      If you can't do that, I say again (like to your other reply), your Mac zealotry is sheilding you from the truth.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    30. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 1, Troll


      You're an irrational bigot, and you're not worth my time.

      You've made it clear that facts are irrelevant to you, and that you're going to claim what you like even when the links you provide say differently.

      Shame on you.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    31. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      But the company ISN'T on track financially. They're on Microsoft (R) brand life support.


      You're such an idiot. apple is the only profitable computer company.

      It isn't on "life support" from Mcirosoft-- hell mcirosoft office isn't even selling well on the Mac. Not because there aren't Macs out there, but because people don't care about office anymore.

      Yes, actually, the iBook beats your celeron and costs less.

      Like I said, you're a bigot, you don't care about the facts, you're just going to rant and rave.

      You probably think Microsoft bougth a big chunk of apple with that "investment" of $150Million...

      Sheesh.

      I understand why slashdot readers are linux fans, but do they have to be so stupid? Where are the programmer,s the people who can recompile their kernel? The people with basic computer architecture knowledge? Buying a machine with a celeron is like buying a PowerPC 603-- EG: A Mac laptop of about 1996 vintage would beat your celeron in a laptop. PC laptops (non-transmeta anyway) are particularly hobbled due to the x86 really high power draw.

      You talk about truth and zeolotry? Get a fucking education first, man. When you understand the words I'm using, then you can talk about truth.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    32. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've made it clear you are illiterate, since you refuse to read my links.
      Therefore you aren't worth my time.
      Go back to highschool, illiterate Mac Zealot.
      Shame on you for using your lack of reading skills against me.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    33. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >You're such an idiot. apple is the only profitable computer company.

      That's a gas.

      >Yes, actually, the iBook beats your celeron and costs less.

      It isn't a celeron (I screwed up -- it is actually a mobile PIII). Either way, though... let's see those iBooks, and pretend my laptop only has a celeron for fairness...

      Here's a link that shows the price at $1,300 for the iBook, and its features, at about the time I purchased my laptop. Now, $1,300 would be the price you need to be at to be correct, if I were talking US$, but I'm talking $CDN. But $2000 CDN is still somewhat less than what I paid.

      So, I'm assuming this is what you are talking about.

      What it lacks:

      - Memory (a paltry 128 MB is only 50% of the memory standard in my laptop)
      - Video (my latop has an ATI Radeon, so I can do 3D well enough to most all play games released at the time of the laptop)
      - Space (10 GB is 33% of what my laptop can store).
      - Video (1024x768? Give me a break. Not even close to 1400x1050)
      - Media Drive (beats me what's standard for $1,300 -- but I bet it isn't the cream of the crop CD-RW/DVD drive)
      - Floppy Drive (none? Even as an option for the media bay? Now that's stupid)
      - Expandability (ZERO PC-Card slots? What is this, 1990?)
      - Software (I don't see a big list of software there, so I think I would be safe to assume it doesn't come with much other than the OS)

      Extra features:

      - Less weight (4.9 lbs is a little bit nicer than 5.2, but nothing to write home about).

      Tell me again why this unit compares with mine? I just don't see it.

      Apple computers are a rip-off, and will continue to be as long as Apple has no competition in their market sector.

      >Like I said, you're a bigot, you don't care about the facts, you're just going to rant and rave.

      Like I said, you're a zealot, you don't care about the facts, you're just going to rant and rave.

      >You probably think Microsoft bougth a big chunk of apple with that "investment" of $150Million...

      Since we're putting words into each other's mouths, you probably think that laptop could do everything mine could, and that the list price is way off.

      >I understand why slashdot readers are linux fans, but do they have to be so stupid?

      I understand why you are a Mac Zealot, but why do you have to ignore the facts when I present them to clearly?

      >Where are the programmer,s the people who can recompile their kernel?

      I recompile my own kernels. You're talking to a slack user since well before the 3.0 series.

      >The people with basic computer architecture knowledge?

      I could run circles around you on computer architecture. Just ask.

      >Buying a machine with a celeron is like buying a PowerPC 603-- EG: A Mac laptop of about 1996 vintage would beat your celeron in a laptop.

      Tis true (not all of it though). My mistake. I meant to say PIII. Here's my actual unit, for your reference (although mine only had 256 MB RAM).

      >PC laptops (non-transmeta anyway) are particularly hobbled due to the x86 really high power draw.

      HUH? I get 3 1/2 hours from my battery, and my laptop is virtually the identical weight to that iBook, but carries far more features.

      You're WAY in left field now. x86 technology has used the same technology as Mac (RISC) since, oh, 1995 or so. Get into this millenium, will you?

      >You talk about truth and zeolotry? Get a fucking education first, man.

      Got a better one than you it appears.

      >When you understand the words I'm using, then you can talk about truth

      When you aren't blinded by zealotry, maybe I'll be better able to understand you.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    34. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Whoop-D · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I think they need to offer the top end of both the ATI and NVIDIA line. Apple needs FIREGL and QUADRO boards as build-to-order. Or they should re-examine why they're gung-ho on Maya for OSX. Their highest of high end configurations are still only offering gamer boards and drivers. We've got the GF4MX in our editorial dual GHz PowerMac and we haven't had troubles with it. But I would so wish for a Quadro4 in my Macs.

      --
      "This is your life, good to the last drop. It doesn't get any better then this." --Tyler Durden
    35. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      as a proud Brit, I'd like to see a 3D Labs card in there even MORE (and they're the fastest OGL cards on the planet!)

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    36. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Whoop-D · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm interested in the new 3DLabs chipset that was previewed in MAXIMUM PC...they're pricey though. But, as a build-to-order they would be perfect for folks like the "Rebel Unit" up at ILM or my friends at The Orphanage who both run Maya and ElectricImage on Macs. I have to stick to doing my 3D on Windoze or Linux workstations until Apple convinces SESI to port Houdini to OSX.

      --
      "This is your life, good to the last drop. It doesn't get any better then this." --Tyler Durden
    37. Re:So where's the Mac version? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Windows is so great... I just love it when I plug my AGP video card into my AMD system, and bring Windows crashing down, permanently. Or there's that whole thing about the video capture being distorted, and there's nothing to be done about it. Or more fun is Windows spontaneously committing suicide and corrupting it's own system files for no reason.

      Besides, getting down and dirty is for Linux users. The BSDs actually work.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  2. You can take my nVidia card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...When you pry it out of my cold dead hands.

    Or when ATI starts to provide decent Linux 2D/3D drivers for their products.

    1. Re:You can take my nVidia card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom's Balkanized.

    2. Re:You can take my nVidia card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Balkanized yours twice while her Kernel dumped!!

    3. Re:You can take my nVidia card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yours likes it when I dump Kernels in her mouth.

      Thank god for 3rd shift computer babysitting jobs. Oh and capitalism for such a meaningful existence. Much better than nihilist existentialism. George Will is a good writer. Whooa, I better stop before I become intellectually dishonest.

  3. Fantastic! by cybercomm · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is great progress for ATI, especially considering the weakness of it's main competitior in "home cinema" field...

    Now if they could just get some **decent** drivers to go with this card (catalyst is a great step towards the goal, dont get me wrong, but ATI has always been a little weak in driver field)

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    1. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how to spell you moron.

    2. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut up you sensless bastard..i kno i know this is flamebait...but when you have spent last 30 hours coding stupid AIX i think you are allowed to make some spelling mistakes..good night

    3. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It figures. AIX sux, so you must be crappy.

    4. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but when you have spent last 30 hours coding stupid AIX

      Am I supposed to be impressed?

    5. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Mr. Hardcore Coder.

      Eat a dick.

    6. Re:Fantastic! by piznut · · Score: 0

      "ATI has always been a little weak in driver field"

      Also.. The pope has always been a little weak in the kickboxing field.

  4. Seems nice by skydude_20 · · Score: 2

    but its just hard to justify wanting this until Doom III is out and we all know exactly what works well with it.
    but then again, like they say
    If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR, we'd say that the company is efficiently firing on all eight cylinders.

    so it better work cuz this is good stuff...

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
    1. Re:Seems nice by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      don't forget, though, that at Quakecon this year Carmack said himself that Doom 3 was written to take advantage of GeForce 3-level technology

      makes me happy for a year or two

      but I still can't argue with the tournament machines at QC idiling around 350fps...that was amazing

    2. Re:Seems nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR

      *Sigh*

      NASCAR is the name of the association. What the original author meant is "If ATI were a Winston Cup stock car..."

      Although, I do give him credit for proper use of the subjunctive.

  5. more reviews here... by Maditude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anandtech has a review and TechReport as well .

    1. Re:more reviews here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting more karma won't make your zits go away.

    2. Re:more reviews here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If people are going to start telling the truth around here, then I'm going to bed.

  6. Obligatory Beowulf Cluster Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

  7. Looks interesting by yobbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The performance on these things is fantastic. Of course, being the cruel world it is, ATI's linux drivers prevent me from even considering purchasing a card. I'll wait for NV30, thank you.

    1. Re:Looks interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you will wait another 20 years before you talk to a girl again.

    2. Re:Looks interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you learn english from watching Bonanza re-runs or something?

    3. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's too bad, because I was looking for another 3D card to buy for my system.

      After asking around what options there were for good 3D support under Linux, I bought an nVidia GeForce 4. Problem is, I'm having some severe issues with it. Running anything OpenGL that has some intense rendering (Return to Castle Wolfenstein, for instance) will do one of two things: 1) cause X to lock up, flashing Scroll Lock and Caps Lock at me once every second, or 2) spontaneously reset my machine. Obviously, this is not a good thing, and I'm actually quite disappointed.

      It appears to be something deeper than a driver issue, though, as I get RTCW to crash under Windows in the exact same manner, and under the exact same conditions as under Linux. (Windows bluescreens, while X locks up.) I've tried Quake3, RTCW, and other simple OpenGL apps (glxgears, fsv, etc.), and all cause my machine to shit itself.

      It's not a problem with the card, either, as I bought two separate GeForce4 cards from two different manufacturers, and both had the exact same issues. Plus, my system doesn't contain any backwoods generic parts; Intel SE440BX-2 Motherboard, PIII Processor.

      I just don't get it. It's a shame, too, because my previous card (3dfx Voodoo3) was a pain in the ass to get working with 3D in Linux. I e-mailed nVidia and posted a message to their forums, both of which have gotten me no replies.

      I can't recommend nVidia at this time, and I've heard worse things about ATI's Linux support. Since Linux is my primary OS (I only installed Windows to test out the above scenario), I honestly don't know what to do.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    4. Re:Looks interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, make sure you have "r_smp 0" instead of "r_smp 1" regardless of how many CPUs you have.

      Second, see if you get these RTCW crashes with a non-GF4 card.

      Third, good luck.

    5. Re:Looks interesting by yokem_55 · · Score: 1

      You might want to lower your AGP settings in your bios. If they are at 4x, lower them to 2x. Try turning off agp options like fast writes and side band adressing. This might help if you have a mobo with a flacky agp implimentation.

      --
      ...and IN SOVIET RUSSIA, beowulf clusters imagine 1, 2, 3 profit!!!! jokes made out of YOU!!!
    6. Re:Looks interesting by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      If your problem is occurring across os platforms, then it's probably not an os, driver, or software issue. Since it happens in other opengl games, it's not a particular game issue. Since it's more than one card, it's not a faulty card.

      More likely, I'm guessing you have a problem with either heat or power. Try running with the case open and with a big ole room fan blowing in the computer. If that doesn't work, then try a different (i.e. better) power supply.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    7. Re:Looks interesting by Shillo · · Score: 1

      Quoting from ASUS FAQ on Anandtech (this seems to be the general issue with all BX boards):

      'With many of the ASUS Slot 1 boards, you can even use 133MHz FSB processors. Be aware though, that the BX chipset does not officially support the 133MHz FSB and is not guaranteed to operate at this frequency. In addition, the AGP bus will be running out of spec at 89MHz as the BX chipset has no 1/2 AGP multiplier. Most recent video cards, such as the nVidia GeForce family, are able to handle these speeds without too much difficulty.'

      While the FAQ says that the cards /should/ handle weird AGP clock, it doesn't mean that they do. I'd tend to blame BX chipset for your problems.

      --

      --
      I refuse to use .sig
    8. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      The problem with that theory is that the FAQ answer is stating that if you're using a processor with a 133 MHz FSB, that's when your AGP speeds get out of whack and off-spec. My PIII is running at 100 MHz.

      In any event, this may be a problem anyway. The GeForce card I have is a 2x/4x AGP card, while the motherboard caps AGP at 2x. The card may simply be having trouble bussing down to 2x on this particular rig. Who knows.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    9. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      1. I haven't tried that; it's a single slot board. I'll check it out.
      2. RTCW didn't crash at all with my Voodoo3.
      3. Thanks.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    10. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      If your problem is occurring across os platforms, then it's probably not an os, driver, or software issue. Since it happens in other opengl games, it's not a particular game issue. Since it's more than one card, it's not a faulty card.

      These were my exact assumptions as well.

      Heat was considered and quickly dismissed, as my case has adequate cooling - dedicated processor fan, dedicated video card fan, and a large rear case fan. I did not, however, even consider the power issue. I recently bought a new case with a 300W power supply, so if all else fails, perhaps I'll check that route. Thanks.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    11. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      My BIOS doesn't have these selections for AGP, but I did attempt to monkey with the AGP settings via the nVidia driver. Nothing helped, really.

      On top of everything, X takes 18 seconds to initialize video with this card. It's depressing.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    12. Re:Looks interesting by cobar · · Score: 2

      Make sure the agp ratio is set to 2/3. You can probably choose to run at 2/3 or 1/1. If you're at 1/1 you're running the card at 100mhz instead of the spec'ed 66mhz and the card can't handle that.

      Other things to try which you may have done already:
      Set:
      Options NVAGP "0"
      to disable AGP.
      Run distributed.net or some other stress tester overnight (preferrably 2 copies at once to maximize context switching and cause OS crashes quickly) to ensure you aren't having some sort of cpu heat related issue. If it's not the video card, it has to be some other aspect of the setup. Your most likely culprit is heat, followed by a bad or inadequate power supply.

    13. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      Indeed, I've screwed with the NvAGP settings serveral times, all with no luck. Plus, I've had the distributed.net client running continuously on this box for about three years. Granted, it was a single copy, but CPU heat has never exceeded tolerence levels. (I have an external LCD screen with temperature monitoring. The CPU hovers at around 95-100 degrees Fahrenheit.)

      As I mentioned here, heat was briefly considered, but there is good cooling in my case. I also mentioned that I hadn't considered the power supply, and that could very well be the problem. That'll be my last attempt at a solution before I return the card.

      Thanks for the suggestions.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    14. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      Forgive my ignorance, but where is the AGP ratio set?

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    15. Re:Looks interesting by damiam · · Score: 1

      Have you tried a different monitor? X took 15 seconds to initialize my Voodoo3 on my old 15" monitor, but on my new 19" one it pops up instantly.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    16. Re:Looks interesting by dinivin · · Score: 2


      Too bad the nVidia's driver aren't stable under Linux on my machine.

      Dinivin

    17. Re:Looks interesting by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
      I did not, however, even consider the power issue. I recently bought a new case with a 300W power supply, so if all else fails, perhaps I'll check that route. Thanks.

      I had some real problems with my GeForce 2 MX card in an ASUS P5A motherboard until I reduced the power drain by unplugging some things (e.g. floppy, CD-R/W, etc.). That improved stability a lot.

      I just got a new 300W power supply last night. Once I get it installed, we'll see if I can both play games and burn CDs on the same machine...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    18. Re:Looks interesting by xamel · · Score: 0

      300 watt

      300 Watts???I'd go with a beefier PS if I were you, my Athlon uses a 450 Watter

      --
      GOD DAMNIT , MODERATE ME!
    19. Re:Looks interesting by Ed209 · · Score: 1

      I could be crazy, but I remember reading something about Geforce cards and BX chipsets.. Certain implementations of BX motherboards were just not designed to provide enough power to the AGP slot to drive new Geforce cards. Unfortunately I cannot quickly find a link.

      --
      If at first you dont succeed, relax, success is overrated anyway.
    20. Re:Looks interesting by entrigant · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know what to do.

      Do your research. Almost all problems with nvidias drivers involving crashes and freezes have been experienced before, and many have been solved. If you're having so many problems you're simply not trying hard enough.

    21. Re:Looks interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is this +5 Insightful? Because he can't get his Nvidia card working?

      You say your system doesn't contain backwoods generic parts, but it certainly does contain older parts. If it locks up doing the same in Windows, it doesn't mean that the cards are at fault. Actually, since you have tried a number of cards, I would say your system is at fault. Perhaps you are overheating? Perhaps your power supply doesn't cut it? Perhaps you are overclocking? The GeForce4 is known to be very power hungry, and a poor power supply can certainly cause problems such as you are having.

      I have had zero problems with my GeForce 4 under Linux. Of course, I have a brand new board, and a 465 Watt power supply. Not a 4 year old chipset and weak powersupply. Don't blame Nvidia because their brand new cards don't work on your old board.

    22. Re:Looks interesting by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Who modded this up? His GeForce 4 doesn't work. Why is it modded up as interesting?

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    23. Re:Looks interesting by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

      My guess it would be in the bios settings (it's pretty low level to control agp ratios). Still, I've been having similar problems as you have had with the Geforce. I have 2 different cards: ATI rage128 (32MB agp), and a ATI all in wonder (rage128, 16MB, pci). When I use the AGP card only, I get consistent system crashes, along with weird artifacts in mplayer. It seems the colorspace splits itself over other parts of video memory. The other card is a bit slower (pci, 16 MB), but I can do 3d without crashes. But I get no more than 30 FPS on UT in linux. Some other notes is that when I run glgears, it seg-faults on my agp card. Yeah. that nasty.

      If I use Fullscreen in MediaPlayer in Windows, I get a click-reboot problem (with my AGP card). t does work a bit better with my pci card.

      Your problem isnt contained to "nVidia" or my ATI cards. I do run a Asus k7ta-raid (possibly I could flash my bios, but only recently have I had any problems.

    24. Re:Looks interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're having so many problems you're simply not trying hard enough.

      and this is why linux will never capture the desktop.

    25. Re:Looks interesting by cobar · · Score: 1

      What the other guy said. It should be a Bios option, probably in the advanced chipset settings section.

  8. Warning to all males by Schik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beware - owning this will be a DEAD giveaway that you have a very, very tiny penis.

    1. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to buy this card to prove that to us Schik, we'll take your word for it.

    2. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I'm a woman? Wouldn't that be amusing!! heheheh

    3. Re:Warning to all males by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Like owning anything from micro, soft does?

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the "warning to all males", rather than "warning to all"...

    5. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that would be HOT and we could make a lot of money.

    6. Re:Warning to all males by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Beware - owning this will be a DEAD giveaway that you have a very, very tiny penis.

      It's hidden away inside your computer where no one will ever see it and its timedemo scores will be outclassed in less than 7 months time. That hardly sounds like overcompensation to me. I'd opt for enlargement surgery instead, that way you'll have a visibly apparent bulge (and even more so if it gets infected) and longer-lasting babe attracting results.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    7. Re:Warning to all males by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too true, I've heard girls really go for infected penis.

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    8. Re:Warning to all males by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      AIW cards are hardly hidden, all these outputs they mention, aren't on the card, there are only like 2 or 3 outputs on the card iself and you plug some crazy cables into them

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    9. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like being a Linux eliteist asshole instead of helping the newbies out? Besides, don't have to tell everyone your dirty little secret. Having the card would just be affirmation to something everyone already knew.

    10. Re:Warning to all males by ergo98 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It does? How did this score 5, because really it isn't all that funny. Indeed, I'd say a more apt observation would be that berating those owning this is a dead give away that you have a very, very tiny penis. You know the type: The jealous, envious type that is green (probably because of the previously mentioned tiny penis) over every success of someone else, so they ironically proclaim that everything that person does is compensating for a small penis, etc. Got a new car? Tiny penis. Physically fit by keeping active or working out? Tiny penis. Good computer? Tiny penis. Beautiful wife/gf? Tiny penis. You get the picture.

    11. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say this based on the belief that anyone with anything other than a tiny penis would be busy masturbating to goatse all day long. Sorry to inform you, but we all aren't like you Schik.

    12. Re:Warning to all males by n3bulous · · Score: 2

      Actually, there is some kook psychologist. mentioned in my friend's textbook in college, who has a theory that all people who have fixations on technological whozawhatzits are necropheliacs...

      --
      "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
    13. Re:Warning to all males by karnal · · Score: 1

      Someone actually pays for Microsoft software???

      haaaaahaaaaaahaaaaaaa!

      --
      Karnal
    14. Re:Warning to all males by henele · · Score: 1

      "It's hidden away inside your computer where no one will ever see it and its timedemo scores will be outclassed in less than 7 months time."

      Yeah, its nothing to do with appendages, just replace 'computer' with 'office', and 'timedemo' with, well pretty much anything, and it turns out it actually represents you completely :)

    15. Re:Warning to all males by tgd · · Score: 2

      So what does it mean if I'm still using an Mach32 card?

    16. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware - owning this will be a DEAD giveaway that you have a very, very tiny penis.

      What about geekchicks? Do they end up with smaller breasts?

    17. Re:Warning to all males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwhaahah...a flamebait and an overrated. Why do I envision some low self-confidence zit-faced loser who assauges their own fears of inferiority by attempting to turn lemons into lemonade and casting every success of others as a sign of hidden failure? What a bunch of losers.

  9. Whoa... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Games. And TV.

    The latest All-in-Wonder Value edition has the thing they've been missing: beer. Yes, it actually has a small microbrewery/breakout box, so that your computer can be all that you need; it even does it by remote control.

    The full package includes an IV breakout box from which cola is fed interveinously (and blood removed), effectively eliminating any and all need to leave the computer for any reason whatsoever.

    The next edition is expected to be fully sentient, allowing those eccentric geeks who feel the need for friendship (for some strange reason). This new edition will be dubbed "All-in-Wonder: Heroin Edition," crediting the fact that heroin users want for nothing but the drug, just as All-in-Wonder users should want nothing else.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Whoa... by Oggust · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and you can probably pop popcorn off of the thing as well, if you just remove theheatsink/fan assembly and the thermal paste, and add some mazola instead!

      Brings a whole new meaning ot the term "home entertainment system", doesn't it?

      /August.

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    2. Re:Whoa... by The_Prophetx · · Score: 1

      I think I'll hold off for the card following in the 'Heroin' line. The Mobile All-in-Wonder: Submissive Girl Edition.

      Like it's predecessor, the new submissive girl line will include a full bar (hence the submissive part) for when you (or preferably the 'female specimen', as it's known in the ATI control panel) really need that shot of vodka. The new mobility feature actually allows geeks to go into the 'big blue room' to acquire the girl.

      In addition to the above you also get remote control features. Yes, with remote control features, your new All-in-Wonder can actually go and get the girl for you. No more wandering down the driveway hoping your dream date will come to you.

      And of course the reason you would get a card like this, Video Capture and playback. Now you'll have the ability to capture those intimate evenings provided by this new line as proof to all that you CAN get a girl.

      --
      For all the things I have not the power to change.....
    3. Re:Whoa... by Zemran · · Score: 2

      I cannot find where to attach the catheter ???

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  10. Ati Suuuucksss by Wierd+Willy · · Score: 0

    Every time I have purchased on of their products, It hoses my system. Twice is once too many. Never again.

    --
    Stupid Humans.....
    1. Re:Ati Suuuucksss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I have purchased on of their products, It hoses my system

      You see, that's your problem. After you purchase the card, you must install it. RTFM for Dummies!

  11. Video Recorder by atrus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was struck by this phrase from the review:

    Should you be interested in a particular word or phrase from a captured show, you can search the close captioned database and playback will begin at the section of the stream.

    That feature makes my day :) Kudos to ATI for adding something useful to the video recorder program.

    1. Re:Video Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am struck by your apparent inability to attract a female. Hang in there, bud. You might get lucky with a hooker at comdex one of these years.

    2. Re:Video Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is pure genius! +6 Nobel Prize-worthy

    3. Re:Video Recorder by piznut · · Score: 0

      FWIW: ATI tv tuner software has had this feature for a LONG time. I can't pinpoint it exactly, but I seem to remember a coworker telling me about this around `95

    4. Re:Video Recorder by atrus · · Score: 1

      Well, its been ages since I've had the oppurtunity to play with an AIW, but its a nice feature. Now, if TiVo had a keyboard, or a way of exporting an index of your recorded programs.... but thats just wishing :)

    5. Re:Video Recorder by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2

      The Quicktime format has this ability as well. It takes a bit of tweaking, but it can be very effective for searching for certain terms inside an instructional video for instance.

  12. It's neat to have, but...... by FaasNat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a cool gadget to have on the computer with the instant replay/time shifting Tivo-like capabilities and it's there on my list of "toys" to have. However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.

    --
    There's never enough when you have too little
    1. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a really attractive person. I bet you weigh 300 pounds and smell like fried pork rinds.

    2. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Com2Kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.


      Then do what I did, get a large monitor (or a good quality TV), hook it up to secondary output , and shove a couch in your computer room.

    3. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by FaasNat · · Score: 1

      300 pounds? I guess you don't realize how many calories you burn pressing the buttons on the clicker.

      --
      There's never enough when you have too little
    4. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.

      Agreed. And here's the answer: a VGA to Component transcoder. Use that HD-compatible TV as a monitor for your computer. Now the only issue is whether or not ATI has added better custom resolution support for the 9700. The 7500 AIW I have sucks quite hard, as I can't get a custom resolution that gets rid of excessive overscan. nVidia can do it, so why can't ATI?


      And as long as I'm making a wishlist, how about somebody make a VIVO card that accepts HD signals via YPrPb component input? I'd pay good money for that.

    5. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wont get rid of the pork rind odor, though.

    6. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by FaasNat · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting idea. Unfortunately, my room doesn't have the space because (going by the _flawless_ logic of the poster above) I weigh 300 pounds.

      --
      There's never enough when you have too little
    7. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This AC is the next Don Rickles. Somebody send him to Vegas!!

    8. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by broller · · Score: 2

      However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.

      Um, that's sort of the point of getting an All-In-Wonder over just a plain TV capture card. Since the card also has TV-OUT you can just run your cable to the room with the TV in front of the couch and watch there.

    9. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      Actually the Radeon 9700 Pro comes with a standard set of component cables (feed off the TV-out) that can work at 480i/480p/720p/1040i on a TV capable of receiving HD resolutions.

      The overscan issue seems to have been from the cable conversion the AIW Radeon 8500's had & the fact your using a non-Ati device to do the same on a AIW Radeon 7500.

      Unfortunately thier is still no component in though... I could make use of that as well...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    10. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Osty · · Score: 1

      Actually the Radeon 9700 Pro comes with a standard set of component cables (feed off the TV-out) that can work at 480i/480p/720p/1040i on a TV capable of receiving HD resolutions.

      Ah, yes, ATI's component convertor. Sure, it was only $30, but most people who have one have reported flakiness and problems (check out places like the Home Theater Spot or AVS Forum).


      The overscan issue seems to have been from the cable conversion the AIW Radeon 8500's had & the fact your using a non-Ati device to do the same on a AIW Radeon 7500.

      No, the overscan is an issue of how TVs work -- all TVs have some amount of overscan, and TV broadcasts are designed to compensate for this. Even after having my RPTV professionally calibrated, I still have the recommended ~5% overscan on all sides (anything less and you start getting into geometry and convergence issues). nVidia graphics cards support any custom resolution you can define (within their hardware capabilities, of course, but 1080i doesn't even make nVidia cards break a sweat) , and thus you can define a custom resolution that compensates for overscan (you'll need something like EnTech's PowerStrip for this, of course). ATI cards are much less flexible in terms of custom resolutions (or, at least, the 7500 was, and I believe the 8500 was as well). Thus, my wishlist is that ATI would at least come up to the level of nVidia and properly handle custom resolutions.


      Unfortunately thier is still no component in though... I could make use of that as well...

      Immersive's Holo3DGraph video processor card does have component inputs, but those only accept SD interlaced inputs (480i, basically), not HD or progressive scan inputs (480p, which isn't HD, or 740p or 1080i). I've heard mention of DirecTV units that can be captured from via coax input (something about the box will output whatever channel it happens to be on through channel 3 or 4 of the coax, so you'll need an HD tuner card in your PC to pick up the signal from the STB), but I haven't researched this very much, and I have no idea if AT&T will do something similar (they're bringing HDTV to digital cable in my area sometime in the next few months). If that doesn't work, then I'm SOL with my HTPC once HDTV gets here (and I'll definitely at least try the HDTV feed, because I've been pining for it for over a year).

    11. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Huh? What does your weight have to do with if you can fit a monitor in the room. Either the room is too small or not, heh.

      Actualy with those flat panel HDTV Plasma screens out now. . . . quite expensive, but hey, if you really are dedicated to bringing it all together into one box. . . . :)

    12. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could connect the DVI to a digital projector, and watch on a big screen. This should be better than component video to an HDTV.

  13. More powerfull than my graphics card by AstroMage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gnashes his teeth and tears his hear out...
    Aaarrrggghhhh, only 3 months after I bought my latest and greatest GC, yet another one comes out which is better. I'm becoming obsolete... Sinking into oblivion... Nnnnnnnoooooo......!
    ;-)

    1. Re:More powerfull than my graphics card by larien · · Score: 2

      Wow, a whole 3 months before you became obsolete? Damn, you must have been ahead of the game when you got your last card!

    2. Re:More powerfull than my graphics card by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      Dude, everyone knows the moment you cut the umbilical cord, you're three months obsolete!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  14. Yep by bogie · · Score: 2

    you said it. If you need 3D ATI gets ruled out. Its too bad, since this weekend I could have bought a ATI 8500LE 128MB for only $99 at Compusa, but knowing that I'd like the option to be able to play UT2003 or Doom III when it comes out, I'm going to be spending $40 more and buying a GF4 4200.

    What ever happened to that project funded by the weather channel to make a DRI driver? When its done is anyone even going to be buying these cards anymore?

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Yep by chefren · · Score: 5, Informative

      The DRI-project have 3d-support available in CVS and binary snapshots with semi-friendly installers available. I'm using a snapshot now. Remember that this is not yet stable code (whatever that means). Look for 'r200' snapshots on their download page.

    2. Re:Yep by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Not yet stable code?

      Does that mean that it is like ATI's supplied drivers have been?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Yep by chefren · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it means that if I leave an OpenGL screensaver running while going away for a few hours, I am greeted by the lilo boot menu (i have no timeout) when I come back. Nothing in the logs, the machine just reboots it seems. Also using Xv in mplayer results in a black box that won't go away until I start another Xv app, like xawtv which works well. If you just need Xv, go for the gatos project instead (better Xv, no 3d).

    4. Re:Yep by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Informative

      What ever happened to that project funded by the weather channel to make a DRI driver? When its done is anyone even going to be buying these cards anymore?

      You can download the source for a beta here. The cvs files are updates regularly. I think there is a binary somewhere on the Tungsten Graphics site.

      --
      :wq
    5. Re:Yep by mallan · · Score: 1

      There are no 3D drivers for the R300 under Linux at present, and AFAIK, there are no plans for DRI drivers for this chip. The specs have not been released by ATI, and last I heard, they aren't going to be.

      ATI is planning on releasing binary-only Linux drivers for the R300 at some point in the future, however.

      --
      "Good people drink good beer"
  15. Two words... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

    Stable drivers?

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    1. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know some stable drivers:

      Bill Elliott in the #9 Dodge

      Dale Jarrett in the #88 UPS car

      and

      Bobby Labonte in the #18 Interstate Batteries car.

      Of course, the least stable driver is Tony Stewart in the #20 Home Depot Pontiac.

  16. Three more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article?

  17. huh...Is it an advert by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR, we'd say that the company is efficiently firing on all eight cylinders. The Mobility RADEON 9000 rules the mobile market, the well publicized RADEON 9700 Pro delivers the best performance to gaming enthusiasts, and the RADEON 9000 Pro is a solid mainstream card. Further, ATI's latest round of hardware has been complimented by relatively stable drivers - a first, as far as the gaming community is concerned."

    This is kind of irresponsible journalism, the reviewer has simply lost the objectiveness, and the article seems to be biased, infact heavily biased.I know many wouldnt agree and swear by ATi, its not about ATI being good or bad, its about over hyping a product.

    Infact while reveiw, the whole commentry is manufacturers spec sheet. Where are the facts buddy!!? No comparison, as if it were the only card in the market?

    I am sure it must be a good card but we need hard specs actual figures, not sensationalist journalism.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:huh...Is it an advert by ottffssent · · Score: 2
      Infact while reveiw, the whole commentry is manufacturers spec sheet. Where are the facts buddy!!? No comparison, as if it were the only card in the market?


      It might as well be the only card on the market. Is there anything even *close* to the performance and featureset of the AIW 9700? Does any other company have the same reputation for quality in this segment that ATI has? As far as I have seen, the answer to both questions is a resounding no, yet one single company has managed to combine both into a storied series of outstanding products.

      I'm starting to sound like an ATI ad myself, but your objections seem totally out of line. You want specifications? Read the numerous Radeon 9700 - that part of the card is identical. And what specifications would satisfy you as regards the AIW features of the card? The review discusses both hardware and software in this area, and I expect the product will be as shiny and glowing as the review was. You want benchmarks or something? How would you propose benchmarking a TV card? You're pretty much stuck at 29.97 fields per second (or 25 for PAL), no matter what you do.
    2. Re:huh...Is it an advert by steveha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may be a little over the top, but he is correct.

      ATI's Radeon 9700 is faster than anything current from nVidia. (nVidia will ship something soon that takes first place back, probably, but right now ATI has the hottest board.)

      And that last part is almost damning with faint praise: "after years of sucking, the ATI drivers are less sucky than formerly." His actual words: "relatively stable". Compared to ATI's older drivers, "relatively stable" is high praise.

      So his point was simply that at the moment ATI has their ducks in a row. And they do. I hope they keep it up. (And I also hope nVidia keeps up what they are doing.)

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    3. Re:huh...Is it an advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote: "Does any other company have the same reputation for quality in this segment that ATI has? As far as I have seen, the answer to both questions is a resounding no, yet one single company has managed to combine both into a storied series of outstanding products."

      Guess you've never used their older drivers. Ack.

    4. Re:huh...Is it an advert by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      Uh, well, as far as multimedia graphics cards go, it *is* the only graphics card in the market. The graphics card market as a whole is a lot bigger, but this multifunction category is much smaller. The AIW 8500 pretty much went unchallenged, and now the AIW 9700 Pro just clinches it. NVIDIA has a "Personal Cinema" but I'm pretty sure visiontek was the only company that made any graphics cards for that, and now a) visiontek is bankrupt/gone, and b) it was a gf2mx, which has no comparison to an 8500 OR a 9700.

      Now, whether or not a review site basically rehashes the manufacturer's PR sheet is a different problem, but in this case the AIW is a great product that it certainly deserves the acclaim it gets.

    5. Re:huh...Is it an advert by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1
      "Guess you've never used their older drivers. Ack."

      I assume most people would prefer to use their newer drivers. Perhaps if you di, you would not have a problem with their video cards.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  18. Unnecessary Media Center Causes Crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Ati-all in Wonder BS has been nothing but a headache from the get go. The Tv flips out for a few minutes after every boot up and all the discs and new drivers they have sent me haven't done squat. They just stopped supporting for Win95 and gave up on it. Their media center is like some god awfull evil Microsoft contraption that tries to take control of everything including your cd player and then flips out when decide to just use the windows cd player because their is a piece of garbage. ATi is a joke and their tech support is worse. Do not support them.

    1. Re:Unnecessary Media Center Causes Crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just stopped supporting for Win95 and gave up on it.

      *gasp*

      The nerve!! Let's not purchase their clearly superior product because they stopped supporting a 7 year old OS that has been followed by more than 5 upgrades.

  19. Don't forget. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some, uh, news or something where, uh, Stephen King, uh, died. That was cool. hehe

  20. don't forget firing squad. by leuk_he · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They also have a preview. (which is as good as most reviews)

    The conclusion, just point to any tech site and you will find a review.

  21. Re:Palladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do I.

  22. but you're not by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Funny

    You post on Slashdot, after all.

  23. Re:Whoa... from bbspot.com by JW+Troll · · Score: 0
    Signs You are Forgetting the Difference Between Your Eyes and Your GeForce
    By Will Walker, Jesse Lee John LaCourse and Mark Vonhoffe
    11. You look at sunset and think "I wonder if I can get this in 1024x768". 10. You blink and think "crap, more frame loss". 9. You stare at a leaf for hours and hours trying to discern the pixels. 8. You refer to people who use artificial things like Glasses and Contacts as "lousy VooDoo folk". 7. You avoid large groups for fear of overloading your Polygon renderer. 6. Looking towards the horizon, you proudly announce "I found the Clipping plane". 5. Your vision get blurry and immediately you think "crap, need new drivers." 4. When you drive and the other guy has his brights on, you curse the Gamma rates. 3. You seriously believe one eye has better OpenGL support than the other. 2. You complain to your doctor about biased benchmarks after failing your eye exam. 1. You sing the praises of nvidia engineers each time you see your reflection in a car bumper.
    --
    just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
  24. Have you tried updating your BIOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd try updating your BIOS. I've seen some funky old motherboards that don't support some AGP calls, causing the system to lock when the video card tries to use them. Updating your BIOS can usually solve this problem.

    1. Re:Have you tried updating your BIOS? by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      This was one of my last-ditch efforts to fix the problem. While I now benefit from an updated BIOS, the problem still exists.

      Thanks anyway.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  25. Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Funny

    If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR, we'd say that the company is efficiently firing on all eight cylinders.

    Jeez, if the Radeon was a car, it'd beat all the other car's in 1/4 mile times and top speed, but in a 500 lap race, at lap 200, the paint would peal, the doors would fall off, and the engine would fall out.

    Further, ATI's latest round of hardware has been complimented by relatively stable drivers - a first, as far as the gaming community is concerned.

    I hope they mean a first, as in, first time ATI released relatively stable drivers. What bother's me though is "Relatively stable drivers." well, stable in relation to what? In relation to a blind man balancing a chair on his nose while juggling chainsaws?

    1. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by tunah · · Score: 2
      Jeez, if the Radeon was a car, it'd beat all the other car's in 1/4 mile times

      Nah, the drivers suck. It would probably crash.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    2. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      In relation to the crappy drivers Nvidia makes... I used to own Nvidia based cards exclusively and the have a number of problems just like Ati! What a shock! With all the fanboys claiming Ati's drivers suck and all you'd think they somehow had it better...

      But no, in reality neither card has perfect drivers (I mean come on how many driver revisions has Nvidia had in total?)... In fact I don't think perfect drivers will ever exist in the life of the product... Sure Nvidia's drivers do certain things better (OpenGL support for modeling apps comes to mind), but Ati's drivers do a range of things that Nvidia's cards don't (like just about every single card has TV-out, or how about more MPEG2 decoding capability)...

      Lets all face reality: no drivers for any video card company are perfect.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    3. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by gordyf · · Score: 1

      How many driver revisions has Nvidia had total? This is offset by Nvidia having a single driver download for every chip they've ever made. ATI has a million different revisions, all with cryptic names, making it extremely difficult to find which driver you're looking for.

      Nvidia's drivers are lightyears ahead of ATIs.

    4. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      Could you be more wrong?

      It used to be maybe a little more complex than it is now, but All Radeon cards use the catalyst drivers (even the 9700 Pro). But even back a generation all Radeon's still used the same drivers (my Radeon 64MB VIVO & my Radeon 8500LE have always used the same drivers). This is more amazing than you seem to think since cards like the 9700 Pro aren't evolutionary, but rather revolutionary (the underlying architecture has changed rather than an update to certain components of the chips)... So far all chips by Nvidia have been evolutionary (arguably since the TNT, unarguably since the Geforce 256), yes it's amazingly hard to have a single drivers for related hardware using an almost identical architecture... Please...

      Again neither is perfect neither is horrible... Go take your fanboyness elsewhere...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    5. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      I hope they mean a first, as in, first time ATI released relatively stable drivers. What bother's me though is "Relatively stable drivers." well, stable in relation to what? In relation to a blind man balancing a chair on his nose while juggling chainsaws?

      Weeelll.... I guess for there to be a man performing such a stunt, likely to be fatal if not completely successfull, one could argue that that's an awfully high bar to set. I mean, after all the practicing & what not if our juggler is still able to simply attempt such a feat he/she must be extrodinarily good at what they do. It would, I should think, be of great comfort for the good folks at ATi to know that their driver developers compare well against such a virtuoso. ;p

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  26. the All-In-Wonder variant will run roughly $500 by cheekyboy · · Score: 0

    $500USD, is like way too much in other currencies.

    Sorry, Id stick to geforce varients and an additional $50 tv pci card.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  27. The tuner is nice but.... by Technician · · Score: 2

    Will it do digital TV? HDTV over the air? Analog is scheduled to go off the air. What good is a tuner if there is nothing to receive?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:The tuner is nice but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of all the old tv gear they'll be throwing out! Start your own tv station in your room!

    2. Re:The tuner is nice but.... by Technician · · Score: 2

      Nobody is throwing out the old gear because there is an extreme shortage of new gear. (Something with a DTV tuner) Everything not home theatre is analog only. I know. I've been looking. I have yet to find any store demonstrating DTV with a real over the air signal. All the display TV's are either Digital HDTV dish, or analog. They are never over the air DTV. How can they sell it if they don't demo it?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:The tuner is nice but.... by Farnsworth0110 · · Score: 1

      About 4 or more years ago I saw a National Semiconductor 8 VSB decoder card at NAB. One offs of the card were available at that time for about $10k. It was really just a proof of performance device intended to seed the computer industry with NSC chip sets. Last year most of the video card manufactures seemed to be about to put their products to market. Today all but a few seem to have pulled back. I've been curious if this has been in reaction to the ongoing litigations behavior of the MPA and ARIAA regarding IP and DRM, or if market research has shown a limited market at the price point that they would be able to offer the product. I love the searchable text from the Closed Caption functionality of this product. I've long believed that the killer app. for PVR's was going to be a consumer desktop or embedded version of Virage. Boards such as this have the potential to go along way in driving the acceptance of 8 VSB broadcast transmission and ACTV.

  28. Shocking? No! Tech articles are OFTEN advertorials by fortinbras47 · · Score: 1
    I'm not fully endorsing tanveer's claim that the ati review is just pure advertisement (though the review kinda reads that way...), but I would like to say that tech articles reading like product literature isn't exactly new or shocking, ESPECIALLY with cutting edge, new products.

    I think there are a few reasons for this:

    1) Probably not any Joe Blow reviewer can get their hands on a new piece of hardware (the manufacturer can choose who reviews...) so there is always the potential for selection bias.

    2) There's a strong tendency (and indeed it's easier) to write an article detailing new features of the card than coming up with independent analysis. You can spit out an article based upon a spec sheet and a few qualatative tests in just a few hours. Running independent, objective tests and providing useful context (what does 'Double Precision Framebufferring Alpha Transition System Version Five!' actually mean...) is much more difficult.

    3) With really new products, it isn't exactly clear what are valid benchmarks/comparisons. New products can often game old benchmarks. Also old benchmarks and tests may not reflect optimizations and features that CAN be used in FUTURE games, but aren't currently reflected in today's software.

    On the whole, computer equipment reviews seem more rooted in the stockbroker tradition than the movie critic tradition. Just reading reviews for computer junk, you get a lot more 'buy' recommendations than 'don't buy.'

  29. No Firewire port, though by debest · · Score: 1

    I guess ATi decided that it wasn't worth putting the IEEE1394 Firewire port on the card, like the AIW 8500 DV. But I guess most people would be putting this card on a newer mobo, and more and more of them are supporting Firewire directly. Makes sense, I guess.

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    1. Re:No Firewire port, though by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      thats kinda ironic, i sprung the extra $100 for the 8500 dv specifically because i wanted a firewire port and i was all outa pci slots

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:No Firewire port, though by jmscott42 · · Score: 1

      The firewire ports and silicon tuner were a disaster for ATI-- many, many people had huge incompatibilities from slight instability to system wouldn't even boot properly. (self included, I gave up on the card and got the AIW 8500 128mb instead). Check the forums at Rage3D. I totally agree this card SHOULD have all that but until ATI can make the hardware work, it's best to leave it off.

    3. Re:No Firewire port, though by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1
      "ATI can make the hardware work, it's best to leave it off."

      My 8500DV installed no problem with Win XP and a msi kt266 pro mobo.

      Then again, I turn of PnP in the bios and leave the PCI slot next to the AGP slot unused.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  30. Re:So where's the Mac version? Just try ! by nick-less · · Score: 3, Informative

    Acording to this Site flashing a new BIOS to use PC cards in a Mac is mostly harmless (tried it myself with geforce)

  31. Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To: timothy@monkey.org

    please remove me from your list.

  32. Think about it by swb · · Score: 2

    By the time Analog goes off the air, your grandpa won't want this card or the system it works in let alone you.

    1. Re:Think about it by Adnans · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean his grandchildren? :-)

      --
      "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Think about it by Technician · · Score: 2

      I was thinking this might be a good PVR for DTV ahd HDTV. Alas, there is an analog only input for broadcast signals. If only it would input the same HDTV signals it can send to a HDTV monitor.

      I guess that old article was right. The studios are broadcasting DTV, but nobody is watching. Duh, nobody has a tuner and antenna!

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Think about it by swb · · Score: 2

      Heh, well, I was operating under the assumption that grandparents get by with what we all consider junk equipment (P166, Win95A, etc etc). I didn't think that the grandparents would be dead by the time analog went off the air....

    4. Re:Think about it by Comen · · Score: 0

      I would be very interested to see how playing a video game on my HDTV would look through this thing.

  33. The big thing missing by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is hardware MPEG capture. Decode they seem to have, capture would be ideal. The $149 Hauppage WinTV-PVRs have it.

    1. Re:The big thing missing by presearch · · Score: 2

      Hmmm.
      The Hauppage page says the $149 board uses a software decoder. The upcoming board (WinTV-PVR-250) does mpeg in hardware, it's $100 more.

    2. Re:The big thing missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WinTV250 (which has a hardware encoder) costs around $150 actually. The upcoming WinTV350 (which has a hardware decoder as well as encoder) should be about $250.

  34. ATI drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm still waiting for the stable mach64
    drivers.

  35. it rivals nothing... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that rival most discrete solutions
    Until they come out with HARDWARE MPEG encode and decode on the card it rivals nothing.

    My DV500 video capture card hardware encodes so my processor doesnt have to waste time doing it. My Hollywood+ and my DV500 card both hardware decode. (Cat a mpeg stream to the hollywood+ card and magically that mpeg 1 or 2 file is displayed.. the newer Hollywood cards do Divix (mpeg4) on the card. while the DV500 will do mpegs 1&2 DV and most AVI file types (Not mpeg4 without a firmware change)

    coupled with my Geforce3 I dont see it rivaling anything. ATI's offering is still just a toy, A video card with some neato-things added that are useless for any professional uses (if you want professional results.. I dont see anyone desiring to buy a capture device for anything onther than editing... except PVR.. and if their PVR software that comes with the card is anything like what they send with the last iteration of the all in wonder... it will fail again.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:it rivals nothing... by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 2
      The All-in-Wonder line has never been aimed at the professional user. That DV500 card probably set you back close to $500, and it didn't even come with the fastest 3D acceleration on the market.

      You can call it a toy, I call it fun to play around with in my spare time. And I don't know anyone who's called the AIW cards a failure.

      --
      Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
    2. Re:it rivals nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can call it a toy, I call it fun to play around with in my spare time.

      You may want to rethink your definition of "toy" before you try to use this argument again.

    3. Re:it rivals nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope and that is the awesome thing the DV500 comes with Negative 3d acceleration it IS NOT A VIDEO CARD! and is pure awesome!

      Add a geforce3 for $45.00 and get the DV500 on ebay WITHOUT adobe software and you get the whole shebang for $395.00

      less than this wonderous ATI offering of toy quality. :-)

      have a nice day :-))

    4. Re:it rivals nothing... by GarfBond · · Score: 1
      Found on the anandtech review of the same card:
      "The Cobra engine is the first consumer level video card to offer not only hardware MPEG-2 decode (for watching movies) but also hardware MPEG-2 encode (for encoding video). This allows the All-in-Wonder 9700 Pro to offload some of the MPEG-2 encode functions to the R300 chip (such as discrete cosine transform, DCT), thus saving CPU usage. The Cobra engine makes it possible to shift 10-20% of the MPEG-2 encode process into hardware (according to ATI, the maximum theoretical amount of MPEG-2 encode which can occur in hardware is around 20-25%). As a result, MPEG-2 encoding on the All-in-Wonder 9700 Pro occurs more smoothly and can occur at very low bit rates that were previously very taxing on a CPU. This same engine is present on all R300 based ATI products but only enabled in the All-in-Wonder version."

      The AIW 9700 Pro *can* offload MPEG encode/decode from the cpu to itself. It might not have the same results that one expects from a professional level card, but it can do it. Its gaming capabilities will certainly exceed whatever your GF3 can produce, but that might not be a huge concern for your work.

      The anandtech review also has some more info on the MPEG capabilities of the card, so you might want to look at that. http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1716 &p=4

    5. Re:it rivals nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to ATI only 25% of the encode process can be on the card?

      they are full of crap. 100% of it can be on the card and then spit the resulting mpeg stream out the pci bus.

      this is how any professional card works... and ATI is far from experts in MPEG.

      Let me know when Pinnacle or a real MPEG hardware company makes such ludricus claims.

      ATI = consumer VIDEO DISPLAY CARDS... they do not equal anything professional or even pro-sumer.

    6. Re:it rivals nothing... by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      The card doesn't have hardware encode, that I know of, but it does have hardware decode (which it uses for DVD playback, among other things), and even the AIW128 had hardware overlay and scaling support for DVD, and even AVI/MPEG under XF4.x.

      The AIW isn't necessarily a capture device either, though it can serve that purpose. All I've used it for is watching TV and playing games (PS, etc) on my system. Then again, I've never had the HD space or processor to do anything else.

      --Dan

    7. Re:it rivals nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While hardware MPEG is great for replay use, wouldn't capture to an arbitrary codec (HuffYUV lossless codec comes to mind or Lossless MJPEG) be more useful for edit purposes?

    8. Re:it rivals nothing... by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1
      With the AIW (as well as my old Rage Fury Pro), you can record television at broadcast quality in either MPEG 1 or MPEG 2 format.

      I do not know what "professional level" is, but I know the saved files is almost an exact replica of the broadcast stream. Combine this with a DSS system and you can record near DVD quality movies.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    9. Re:it rivals nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way.. just get a DV bridge or use any consumer camcorder... Capture from firewire directly to DV as if it was on a DV source to begin with...

      that's the use for editing... output to tape is useful for mpeg and mpeg encode is great for digital broadcasting.

      editing is done in the solid DV land.

  36. Xfree86 sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATI is a good product, it's just that
    the lamers at Xfree86.org can't do math.
    maybe they need new code writers that can
    find the sum of 2 + 2.

  37. Of course it's an advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do ya think that slashdot can run this site
    on the sales of bawls?
    slashdot used to be cool, two years ago.
    now it's just advertising for ati, xbox, games, etc.

  38. Will there be a Radeon 9000 based version? by egghat · · Score: 2

    I don't need the latest DirectX-9 gimmicks and want a passively cooled, cheaper, but fast enough version.

    The Radeon 9000 graphic cards are wonderful. An All-In-Wonder-Card based on the Radeon 9000 would be wonderful for my quiet "home theatre - MP3 - DVD - digital videorecorder"-PC.

    But with the lack of resonable Linux driver support this won't happen anyway.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    1. Re:Will there be a Radeon 9000 based version? by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      Unless it's a typo, and they were talking about 9700, this yahoo news item talks about an AIW 9000.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    2. Re:Will there be a Radeon 9000 based version? by egghat · · Score: 1

      It's available in Europe only (not a problem for me, cause I'm from Germany) and ATI doesn't have any specs online. Passive cooling? Driver support for Linux? Perhaps, perhaps not.

      But thanks for the link.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  39. Recording Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know about recording (analog) video with this card (or its predecessors) ?
    Older cards like Matrox Marvel used to compress Video into MJPEG in Hardware. Sice I recall, DirectShow has still a limitation of 4GB for Videos - how about recording analog Video with this card (or older All In Wonders) ?
    Is there a software codec - modern CPUs should be fast enough to do so ? Anyone experiences and comments about quality ?

    1. Re:Recording Video by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

      You can use their capture software to record in mpeg1 or mpeg 2 and msft avi. There are presets for standard AVI, vcd and a few proprietary ATI formats. you can also create your own profile and record, for example, a 320x240 mpeg2 with 41k sound.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  40. Driver problems are a given by matrim99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now if they could just get some **decent** drivers to go with this card (catalyst is a great step towards the goal, dont get me wrong, but ATI has always been a little weak in driver field)

    Some may call the above post Flamebait, but it is true. Jeesh, I remember this same complaint being lodged against ATI back in 1992. Apparently, they are doing something right to still be alive today, despite this constant driver criticism.
    I am not a hardware junkie, but I have been following recent "build your own home theater in a PC" sites, and the jury says: build your system around the limitations of your chosen graphics card. The ATI line of "do everything" cards offers unmatched versitility in the home theater PC market, yet you have to carefully match your requirements with your choice of hardware and software (and driver capabilities).
    IOW, do your homework, build for today, and don't expect your ATI card to do anything wonderful outside of the scope of your current DIY project.

    --
    Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  41. Re:Palladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear, hear !!!

  42. does it work on Linux? by RelliK · · Score: 2

    What is the best video capture card for Linux, preferrably with a supported hardware MPEG2 encoder?

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  43. It has MPEG-2 encoding hardware by systemapex · · Score: 2

    Via the "Cobra" engine on the R300 chip itself, the AIW Radeon actually has MPEG-2 encoding hardware. It doesn't do the whole process in hardware, but enough to offset between 1/5 and 1/4 of the processing overhead from the CPU. This is typical ATI - their first DVD decoding hardware assistance in chips (I believe in the Rage Pro line circa 1997) had enough hardware to offset a chunk of the processing overhead from the CPU. In the following generation, the new chip had essentially full hardware decoding. Expect the next generation of AIW to follow suit.

    1. Re:It has MPEG-2 encoding hardware by swb · · Score: 2

      25% at best doesn't cut it, neither does expecting the next generation to do 50%.

      I'm not sure how you can use the engine on the Hauppage cards (if its just a direct pipe from the capture portion of the card or general purpose engine that can compress a stream sent from the CPU), but full hardware assist would rock for editing MPEG2 streams on the fly without decoding to AVI and then back to MPEG2.

      Doing MPEG2 totally (or even mostly) in software sucks on my dual PIII669 box, with the one advantage that you get total control over the encoding process. I'd kind of wonder how tweakable the MPEG2 output is from a $150 card.

  44. It has MPEG-2 hardware ENCODE and DECODE by systemapex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read Anand's review. The R300's "Cobra" engine provides hardware MPEG-2 encoding assistance. Not completely, but enough to offset 1/5 to 1/4 of the CPU overhead. As I understand, no consumer-level MPEG-2 encoding hardware does all the processing onboard but merely offsets some work from the CPU. Of course, ATI has had MPEG-2 decoding assistance for a LONG time - since 1997. In fact, I have a H+ too and the difference in CPU usage levels between the H+ and my AIW Radeon when watching DVDs is negligible. The Radeon provides superior monitor playback and the H+ provides superior TV playback which is why the two still co-exist. One thing many people overlook is the fact that since the AIW is on the AGP bus, you don't run the risk of overloading the PCI bus when doing video capture and the like. Their PVR software has come a LONG way too. When I first got my AIW Radeon I cursed my decision but since December of last year the software has been excellent. I just wish there was something on Linux to rival it. There isn't. Nothing comes close actually.

    1. Re:It has MPEG-2 hardware ENCODE and DECODE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      difference in CPU usage levels between the H+ and my AIW Radeon when watching DVDs is negligible

      Bull...

      put those cards in a Pentium 133...

      I can watch a DVD /mpeg2 on that super slow PC with the H+ card... No way in hell with the ATI card.

      it makes a MASSIVE difference.. you just dont notice it with yout P-5 36Ghz machine.

    2. Re:It has MPEG-2 hardware ENCODE and DECODE by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Reread anandtech's review... it has hardware ASSISTED encode and decode. The assisted encode shaves off at best 25% of the typical CPU power required to encode. ATI has been rather good at convincing people their AIW's do hardware mpeg. I've seen people claim the 8500 and 7500 do hardware mpeg encode/decode as well. This simply is not the case.

    3. Re:It has MPEG-2 hardware ENCODE and DECODE by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Oh ya.. I almost forgot. Check out the Hauppauge WinTV-PVR 880, 250, and 350 models. Also sigma designs have a REALMagic DVR which is semi consumer level (price tag is a wee bit on the steep side.) All of these do full hardware mpeg2 encode. However the hauppauge cards have crap for software/IR remote.

    4. Re:It has MPEG-2 hardware ENCODE and DECODE by juhaz · · Score: 1

      What does Pentium 133 have to do with R300?

      No one, and i mean NO ONE is stupid enought to buy latest, fastest and most expensive 3d card on the market with intention of putting that beast into a stone age machine.

      Whether or not it does hardware decoding just doesn't matter, everyone who buys things like this already have CPU horsepower to decode anything without difficulties.

  45. GATOS and DRI by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd advise against getting an All-In-Wonder card if you run Linux, since the GATOS team (the folks doing 2D video capture, tuner support, and TV out) and the DRI team (the folks doing OpenGL 3D support) have yet to sync their code so that the two play nicely together. Thus, you can have EITHER video capture and tuner support, XOR accelerated 3D support. You cannot have both.

    I could understand if this condition persisted for a few weeks - the teams are different groups with different goals. However, this has been the case for several MONTHS, and I see no motion towards resolving this.

    This is one of the places that the bazaar approach is weaker than the cathedral approach - independant teams don't co-ordinate very well in such matters.

    So, at this time if you want both tuner support AND accelerated 3D, I would suggest getting a seperate TV tuner card.

    (And I am viewing this very post on a AIW7500. I have a classic AIW in my server in the basement, and in the past I've had a Voodoo 3500TV. I have some experience in this matter.)

    (And I don't have time to fix this - I have to work on modifying the USB joystick drivers to report the hat as buttons so that I can use it under UT/US2003, getting ATA/133 & LBA48 working, getting video streaming working from my DTIVO, trying to find out why Wine has show regressions in the past week....)

    1. Re:GATOS and DRI by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Besides, the video capture is sorely lacking. The "video4linux" interface only implements a small handful (like 4) of the functions in the video4linux api, so most capture programs will NOT work with AIW cards.

  46. better sight without glasses... by Derwen · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    ...is the title of Harry Benjamin's book on a set of simple exercises to permanently cure your eye problems. There's really no need to prop up any part of the multi-billion dollar vision industry, when you can cure yourself :-)
    See here for more info.
    hth
    - Derwen

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
    1. Re:better sight without glasses... by Derwen · · Score: 2
      oops - posted in wrong story ;-/

      --
      http://fsfeurope.org/
  47. Where's the PCI version? AGP is useless to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet again, all the focus is on AGP... OK, OK, i know that AGP is the slot to use, but for me, a PCI version is critical as i use severl small form factor PCs - which don't have AGP slots, but pack enough punch for my needs in a PC the size of a shoebox...

    PCI all-in-wonders are as rare as hen's teeth, and even those models that are four years old are still fetching US$130 and up on ebay - and you won't find
    'em in the main resellers market...

    so how about it folks? got a good recommendation for a combo graphics card/tv tuner card in PCI that works with Linux?

    i'll bet you don't, because there aren't any!!!

  48. Who else is including a TV tuner on their card? by tkrotchko · · Score: 2

    ATI has their share of problems, but the All-In-Wonder line is the only decent card to include a tuner.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  49. Crashes by Teut · · Score: 1

    Battlefield 1942: Crashes Asherons Call 2: crashes & graphic glitches Mafia: crashes GeForce 4600 returned into the AGP slot, Radeon 9700 collects dust until drivers are stable.

  50. Available in Canada - here's the price by John+Kacur · · Score: 1

    The article says that the product and price are not yet available, but actually some computer stores in Toronto are already selling it.

    Eg. http://www.pccanada.com
    for $574.99 Canadian dollars.

  51. Need DTV support by Wavetrain3000 · · Score: 1

    All the right features for me, but I want support for DTV, before the broadcasters legislate DRM. Somebody else said this device will be obsolete before DTV is available. In fact the contrary is true: DTV may create demand for this generation of non-DRM devices.

    1. Re:Need DTV support by stang7423 · · Score: 1

      The product description on the page this article states that it does DTV/HDTV decoding.

  52. Never Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until ATI can come up with excellent, not good, but excellent drivers for Linux, Mac, and the PC I am not buying another of their cards! This is a big deal as I am Canadian and bought only their cards for the past 5 years!

  53. benifits from 8xxx AIW line..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don;t see how this card is SOOO much better then the 85xx AIW line. Sure, i have to get the optional cables, big deal.. The 85xx has been selling for 199 everywhere..

    Where's the product enhancements on the video side..?

    THis card just keeps rehashing the same old features over and over..

    I have a radeon 64mb and besides the remote and HDTV add-ons.. it is basically the same rehash.. (I don't play games)

    F.

  54. Linux? What's that? by MadHungarian · · Score: 1

    Not one mention of Linux in the article...

  55. You're not kidding... by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

    I'm a programmer at a large game company, and not long ago we got our first Radeon. I was astounded at how bad the performance was, and especially at how bad the drivers were.

    In fact, the card is performing so badly that ATi has started shipping many Radeon 9700s out to game developers all over the place in an effort to get us to fix our software with their cards, as if it was our fault that they didn't write their drivers according to the DX8 spec.

    One of the problems their driver had was that it constantly leaked memory. We couldn't run anything (including sample apps!) on it for more than 5 minutes without it leaking texture memory so badly that it would start paging its texture memory to disk!

    I want to see competition for nVidia as badly as everyone else, but I just don't think ATi is it quite yet.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    1. Re:You're not kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I'm a programmer at a large game company, and not long ago we got our first Radeon. I was astounded at how bad the performance was, and especially at how bad the drivers were."


      The Radeon's have been out for quite awhile, why would a gaming company only "recently" get their first Radeon. Then you missed the 7000, 7200 and 8500's.


      I don't work for a gaming company, but I own a Radeon AIW 8500DV and the card runs everything I throw at it perfectly. No problems with games, software or memory leaks.

  56. Details? (Re:it rivals nothing...) by phorm · · Score: 2

    So how much does this DV500 card cost, and - if reasonable - where can one get it. Details, man, details! If it costs $300 then I think I'll just stick with my does-it-all cards or a good 3d card with a cheaper decoded that burns CPU.

    1. Re:Details? (Re:it rivals nothing...) by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      So how much does this DV500 card cost, and - if reasonable - where can one get it.

      Pinnacle Systems

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
  57. They are still missing something by richajoh · · Score: 1

    This product is only useful for people with standard cable or antenna. What about everyone with a digital cable box or satellite receiver? We need a cable mouse, or even better a serial control cable for the satellite box (Tivo comes with one).

    1. Re:They are still missing something by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

      errrrr.... SVHS, Composite, or just the regular coax that plugs in from your sat/cable box.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    2. Re:They are still missing something by richajoh · · Score: 1

      Well that's fine for video input, but you still can't use it for timeshifting or scheduling from the guide. No way to change the box channel.

  58. PVR Software by slashdoIt · · Score: 1

    I used to have an All-In-Wonder Pro (back in the days of the Rage IIc chipset.... when 4mb of video ram was a lot, and AGP was brand new).

    Anyway... Back then, there was no such thing as PVR software (not 3rd-party, anyway). Now there's a few like Showshifter and SnapStream PVS...

    My question is, does anyone know if there are any PVRs that will automatically edit out commercials when they appear in a TV show? I seem to recall that TiVos used to (or still do it)... Surely there must be PC equivalents, no? Checking around on the websites of both Showshifter and Snapstream, though, they don't make any explicit mention of the ability to NOT record commercials...

  59. Don't rush out and buy one yet by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    ATI has yet to get the drivers right....The issue list is LONG and they've started out where they left off with the 8500 and some really lousy driver support. I like the card, but getting all the bells and whistles to work is nearly impossible. The capture drivers have issues, NWN has MAJOR issues with this card, but it is quick, and I keep hoping ATI will get thier act together driver wise...SOON PLS...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  60. But... by BattyMan · · Score: 1


    Will we EVER see a decent Linux driver for it?

    No?

    Then why should I bother paying any attention to it, other than to chalk up one more neato card on the "doesn't work in Linux" list?

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why should I bother paying any attention to it, other than to chalk up one more neato card on the "doesn't work in Linux" list?

      Ignore it. Tell ATI that you are ignoring it. Turnabout is fair play.

      Personally, I just purchased a 7500...

      Why did I buy an ATI card for my Linux box?
      For one reason: Cheap DVI-capability.
  61. R600 by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1

    I am still waiting for the R600, which is supposed to have a very similar chip to that in the Gamecube. Sadly, it is hard to find any information about when and where the R600 will come out.

  62. sounds like the linux crowd is whining too! by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    look a little further down the list, and see the comments about a lack of linux drivers. tsk tsk! i guess it is a winow$ world!

  63. Already has it by moogla · · Score: 2

    It's had that for awhile. The crappy crash-a-minute Cinema package that comes with the ATI WinTV had it too.

    Another cool thing is "magazine mode" which records the closed captions and still pictures taken when the frame changes significantly to make a TV guide-like telecast.

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  64. You're better off with a TV Wonder by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Informative


    I had the original AIW card. It was nice for a while, but when i upgraded to a GF4 4200 I had to give up my TV/PVR capabilities too. So I'd suggest getting an ATI TV Wonder so you can painlessly upgrade your video card later. I still haven't got around to buying a TV Wonder so I can start recording shows on my computer again.

    Oh, and don't get the TV Wonder VE unless you don't want stereo sound.

  65. DTV/HDTV by stang7423 · · Score: 1

    I notice in the product description under Vidoeshader there is a mention of -top quality DVD and all-format DTV/HDTV decode with low CPU overhead First fo all does this mean that this card can replace a Digital Cable box and record The Soprano's (HBO is only on digital cable around here). Is ATI going to get flak from hollywood over this card? I though hollywood was trying to stop people from being able to record HDTV boardcasts in digital form? HDTV -> MPEG2 is pretty high quality.

    1. Re:DTV/HDTV by Snover · · Score: 1

      HDTV *is* MPEG-2, fool.
      Honestly, though. I tried Hauppauge's WinTV-HD and it was a piece of shite. Crashed my computer constantly, didn't work with any digital cable (despite there being a picture of it on HBO Plus in their docs), BSOD'd on our local FOX stream, didn't have 16:9 aspect ratio for HDTV (everything was stuck in a 4:3 box), didn't allow you to do fullscreen (I mean, how trivial can a feature be?? JUST EXTEND THE OVERLAY WINDOW!) Hauppauge are a bunch of posers with overpriced cards. Until I see a card that can decode my digital cable, I'm sticking with my TV-WONDER PCI.

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
  66. Software by boatboy · · Score: 0

    "At that time, the hardware was said to be final, with some minor work left on the accompanying software suite."

    Read: the developers were scrambling to get last-minute hacks working. I've bought the past two All-in-wonder cards. It's a great product, but the software, IMHO, is the weak point. A clumsy interface and oddball errors, along with unusually long load-times are a definite downside. Another is the remote software- it only lets you control SOME parts of SOME of the apps. I'd like to see the remote be able to be fully customizeable per application, including non-ATI apps. The Winamp control will be cool, but what about MoodLogic, etc?

    Not to complain too much. TV, DVD and an RF remote on your PC is enough to make me buy one...twice.

  67. Very useful in parties and games by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    You just mirror the image of the monitor in the TV, and play/see any game or DVD without worriying (sp?) for lack of space for all the viewers. It also works wonderfully for teaching in small groups.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  68. Re:It has MPEG-2 hardware ENC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it has hardware ASSISTED encode and decode. The assisted encode shaves off at best 25% of the typical CPU power required to encode

    Which is exactly what the post said. Or did you not realize that 1/4 = 25%?

  69. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think my choice in the mostest-superlative-computer wars has to
    be the HP-48 series of calculators. They'll run almost anything. And if they
    can't, while I'll just plug a Linux box into the serial port and load up the
    HP-48 VT-100 emulator.
    -- Jeff Dege, jdege@winternet.com

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...