Slashdot Mirror


Next Generation of Holographic Images

suman28 writes "Imagine being able to view an image from all sides and have it interact with you. Scenes or images pop-out at you and change on the fly and are viewable in full color. Best of all, you don't need head-gear or any wearable device to make this possible. They are generated by a computer with two cameras that track your eye movement and there is a transparent LCD screen between you and the display that makes the pictures come alive. Though it may be a while before this becomes part of our daily lives, it is interesting to see what the kind of research being done on this. "

183 comments

  1. here we go... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny

    *insert obligatory 3D pr0n reference here*

    1. Re:here we go... by The+Innocent+Dot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      *insert obligatory 3D goatse.cx reference here*

      PS: if you haven't visited that link, don't!

    2. Re:here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *shudder*

      the goatse pic is something that shouldn't be in TWO dimentions, let alone three

      *barf*

    3. Re:here we go... by buswolley · · Score: 4, Funny
      But its the double whamo of 3D Pr0n & Forced feedback gloves.

      With these, you might be doing more inserting than just: * *insert obligatory 3D pr0n reference here*

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    4. Re:here we go... by noshellswill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Saw it already gents - 1978 at the Franklin Institute in Phila. ... As I remember it was a gal (+ bathing suit) tumbling in the surf ...

    5. Re:here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But it is already 3D... you can see the insi...

      Oh God... What have I done?

  2. 3D games by SniffleBear · · Score: 1

    Isn't this already possible on 3D games? Talk about interaction!

  3. Just imagine! by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Real-world pop-ups!!! The JOY!

    </sarcasm>

    1. Re:Just imagine! by Kyeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better than pop-under ads.

      Ah, what the hell is that?!?!

      ...-1, Bad humor

  4. all i can think is ... by dlasley · · Score: 1

    how UT would be *very* real in 3D :)

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  5. Re:First thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmmm... holopr0n. And when these are your 1st thoughts, you've got problems. :)

  6. Research, right... by mrgrey · · Score: 5, Funny

    it is interesting to see what the kind of research being done on this. "

    "Research". So that is what pr0n is called now....

    --
    -Tolerate my intolerance
    1. Re:Research, right... by Trogre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A fact little-known on slashdot, but:
      Not everyone is obsessed with pornography.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Research, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... no, not unless Linux or BSD is somehow involved.

    3. Re:Research, right... by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      Amazing... The week after I finish my undergraduate research project on this, there's a slashdot article covering the technoogy. If anyone wants to check out the kind of code needed to compute stereographic holograms in realtime, check it out. It's not very pretty at the moment (I may clean it up after I get the degree...), but it works! Paper and documentation forthcoming...

      http://www.band.calpoly.edu/~lkeagle/holo/

      ~Loren Keagle

    4. Re:Research, right... by mrgrey · · Score: 1

      I myself abhor pornography, but from what I have seen from society and the slashdot community they have grown grotesquely drawn to the drug that it is. Thus the comment.

      --
      -Tolerate my intolerance
    5. Re:Research, right... by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Not meaning to make it sound like you were one of the aforementioned obsessed persons.
      Apologies if the comment appeared otherwise :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    6. Re:Research, right... by Tharsis · · Score: 2

      No.. just about 50% of the population

    7. Re:Research, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, many on slashdot are too young to have developed an interest in porn... yet.

  7. ads by JM_the_Great · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh great... now we'll get -real- pop-up banner ads :)

    --

    --Justin Mitchell
    "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
  8. Too many ads! by Klerck · · Score: 1, Informative

    That page has far too many ads.

    Click here to read it without the annoying ads, but with all the pictures!

  9. Doritos by name_already_in_use · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine the implications for Dorito's.

    --


    Rake Free + Mac Poker: CardCrusade
    1. Re:Doritos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo moderator: try catching the "3-D Doritos" reference. That's not offtopic--it's funny...

    2. Re:Doritos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooOoOooOO...Ali Landry in 3D! mmmmm yum!
      /Homer Simpson Impression

  10. More than one viewer? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    I take it that this doesn't quite work if two or more people are looking at the screen?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:More than one viewer? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

      It was designed that way since the majority of people watch porn alone.

    2. Re:More than one viewer? by russianspy · · Score: 2

      Actually it does work for more than one viewer. Have you ever seen of those hologram pictures? It works on a similar principle.

    3. Re:More than one viewer? by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds wonderful, but one limitation that jumps immediately to mind is that the 3d effect is limited to a single viewer.

      Yes, but is this really that much of a limitation? Obviously for most computer work (or play) there is only one user so then it does not matter. In fact, it could even be an advantage, since the guy next to you on the airplane would not realize that you are watching pr0...er, see your sensitive business documents. For other uses, say family video night, you would have to replace one screen with several of these devices. That would not have to be very expensive, especially not compared to getting one of those enormous TVs that everybody has these days.

      Tor

    4. Re:More than one viewer? by guidobot · · Score: 2, Informative
      one limitation that jumps immediately to mind is that the 3d effect is limited to a single viewer

      That's only the NYU system and the article says later that they're working on that. The MIT true-holograph system can produce the 3D images for multiple viewers, but is limited by the massive quantities of processing power needed. Meanwhile the NYU system runs on a pc but only gives the effect to one person, though:

      "The group is also working on a system that would simultaneously provide 3-D views to multiple observers, such as a team of surgeons debating the best approach to a difficult procedure or a group of video game players competing on a shared monitor"

    5. Re:More than one viewer? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      actually.. no it doesn't. This thing utilizes a camera that tracts the users eye movements.. viewed by someone standying near by it will look like a garbled, ghosted, 2d mess

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    6. Re:More than one viewer? by slex · · Score: 1

      actually it could. track more than one set of eyes and use a display system with a very high refresh rate.

    7. Re:More than one viewer? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that both people would get a 3d view from this, but both people would also see "ghosting" from the other person's view. Unless you are suggesting shutter glasses be used(if they are.. there is not much point in using this instead of a traditional display to show 3d,and how would eye movement be difficult to track with shutter glasses on.)

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:More than one viewer? by russianspy · · Score: 2

      Ooops, communication problem.

      I was talking about the first article where they create a real hologram in some material (I forget now what that was - some kind of plastic?). THAT technology is cool.

  11. Left Thumbs? by thrillbert · · Score: 3, Funny

    after all, millions of video game players would give their left control-pad thumbs...

    I knew there was a reason why other people seemed to be better than I was at Quake. But knowing they had more than one LEFT THUMB makes me realize how handicapped I was in those games...

    Cool technology though.. I guess we are getting to that future we were wondering about 10 years ago..

    ---
    Schizophrenia beats being alone.

    1. Re:Left Thumbs? by gpinzone · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're using a gamepad to play Quake? Uh, there might be another explination. :)

  12. The problem with 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    more often than not 3D is distracting rather than engaging. the best way to make use of 3D is in applications where we EXPECT a 3D image.

    when we drive down the street, since everything is behind glass anyway, it sort of reduces the 3d-ness, doesn't it?

    1. Re:The problem with 3D by infornogr · · Score: 1

      You should try driving with one eye closes some time to remove your depth perception. See how well you can avoid those giant orange pyramids in the distance. You certainly need 3d for driving.

    2. Re:The problem with 3D by falzer · · Score: 1

      > You certainly need 3d for driving.

      There are people with only one working eye who seem to get by just fine.

    3. Re:The problem with 3D by Wrexen · · Score: 2

      Not to offend our one-eyed readers, but some of us have this thing called depth perception that does, in fact, make driving a 3d experience.

      Hey moderators -- don't bogart that fine product you're smoking. Share!

    4. Re:The problem with 3D by qwertyphobia · · Score: 4, Informative
      People with only one eye still have depth perception - they just don't posess stereo depth perception.

      There are many different cues that contribute to our perception of depth: stereo, perspective, parallax, overlapping objects, shading and shadows and changes in accommodation and convergence of the eyes.

      Those with one eye lack stereo (the strongest cue), but still have a decent amount of depth perception for surviving in the real world. It is only when attempting to use devices that rely soley on stereo to generate a pseudo-3D image that they have problems.

      See this page for a more detailed discussion.

    5. Re:The problem with 3D by krenshala · · Score: 1

      While I have two working eyes, I am unfortuately someone who can say he *failed* the depth perception test. (Though I was able to get the 'practice' questions right ;\ )

      Of course, I drive just fine (mainly cause I know how big an SUV is supposed to be, so I generally know how soon to stop when behind one).

      --

      krenshala

  13. Buck Rodgers by Syncdata · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It may not be the flying car, but I'm amazed by the technologies that I was convinced not long ago, were decades out on the horizon. Holograms, Cybernetic prosthesis, cheap lasers, and common genetic alteration. Good times. Seriously though, here's to hoping the flying car is next.

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Buck Rodgers by infornogr · · Score: 1

      Strange that in a world of space ships and helicopters and supersonic jets people still think of "flying cars" as a fantasy technology of the future. How do helicopters and other personal aircraft _not_ qualify as flying cars?

    2. Re:Buck Rodgers by susano_otter · · Score: 1, Troll
      Seriously though, here's to hoping the flying car is next.

      Of course! After all, we've already beta-tested the combination car-bomb/airplane hijacking with great success!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    3. Re:Buck Rodgers by texchanchan · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do helicopters and other personal aircraft _not_ qualify as flying cars?

      Because there's not one in my garage.

    4. Re:Buck Rodgers by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      do you have a helicopter? Do you commute in it, piloting yourself? that's what I thought.

    5. Re:Buck Rodgers by mgv · · Score: 2

      How do helicopters and other personal aircraft _not_ qualify as flying cars?

      Because there's not one in my garage.


      You know, just when we are getting to terms with how poorly we handle technology, we go wishing for a better one.

      Its taken us decades to build safer roads, invent seatbelts, crumple zones, anti lock braking, all wheel drive and air bags.

      Now we are here wanting to be able to personally lift tonnes of metal kilometers into the sky so that 18 year olds can do laps of the city whilst drunk hoping to impress girls by how close they can swoop a building?

      Can't you see that we do have flying vehicles, they aren't terribly expensive (esp. ultralight aircraft), and that nobody in their right mind would suggest that they gain mass acceptance.

      Having said all that, do you really want to have one in your garage (and everyone else's, too)?

      My 2c

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    6. Re:Buck Rodgers by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      Now we are here wanting to be able to personally lift tonnes of metal kilometers into the sky so that 18 year olds can do laps of the city whilst drunk hoping to impress girls by how close they can swoop a building?

      Who is going to say the idiot is going to steer the car? If you're going to design a new system anyway, do it good, give the computer the controls, let the fool say where he wants to go.

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
  14. The NYU System and multiple users by Hayzeus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how the NYU system would manage with multiple users? Can the "alternating bars" system be adjusted for more than a single user at a time?

    1. Re:The NYU System and multiple users by ngoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was tihnking the same thing but for regular monitors. They already sell those fruity 3D lcd shutter glasses anyways. So if a monitor refreshes at 85 to 120 Hz, you could theoretically show 2 people different screens at 42.5 to 60 Hz by showing each an interleaved screen that was synced to their glasses. So if you could get Quake, UT, etc... to work with a simpler control device, you could have two or more people play with the same system.

      I don't think the computing power is there though to accomadate running the same program twice on the same computer, although really you are just performing the tasks that the programmed AI would do for a character in the game, so maybe giving more manual control isn't a big deal.

      ngoy

      --
      --ngoy
    2. Re:The NYU System and multiple users by infornogr · · Score: 1

      You would have to factor in the fact that the computer would be rendering twice as many polygons and textures, too. Also, who would want to look at anything running at 42Hz for an extended period of time? Migraine city. Neat idea, none the less.

    3. Re:The NYU System and multiple users by uberdave · · Score: 2

      Many people go to the cinema and watch movies at 24Hz for hours.

    4. Re:The NYU System and multiple users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think movies are actually effectively at 48Hz. Could be wrong, though.

  15. Next Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next Generation??? Hell where is the First Generation.

    1. Re:Next Generation by kingofnopants · · Score: 1

      Those baseball cards with the 3-d illusion effect.

      --
      Disco Stu was talkin' to you.
  16. Make your own hologram by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Traditional holograms are made from two beams of monochromatic light.

    Using any old He-Ne laser you may have lying around the house, provide the light source.

    The beam from the laser is divided into two paths. One beam is used to illuminate the object; the other is just a reference beam; you could even shine them while watching Baywatch or something as long as you can keep them fairly steady during the bouncing juggly scenes.

    Also, try to find something in the kitchen or basement that has eight segments coated with a high-quality aluminum to provide for reflectivity in steps from 10% to 80% at 45 incidence (use a ruler or tape measure for quick measurements).

    Oh, one more thing -- the laser should be on for about a half-hour to allow it to stabilize. If it's not warmed up enough after that time and doesn't seem to be very bright at all, peek into where the light comes out while it's on to check for any dust specs that may be impacting the light's exit from the device.

    Bottom line -- (cos^2)(theta) dependencies rock!

    --

    Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    1. Re:Make your own hologram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. Your trolling is WAY too subtle. Although I guess it must be gratifying to see all "Insightful" mods after you post.

    2. Re:Make your own hologram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, "Informative", rather.

    3. Re:Make your own hologram by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Redundant
      peek into where the light comes out while it's on...

      ...and never see out of that eye again!

      Flipping moron. Stare into a class IIIb laser for a while. While you're at it, stare at a solar eclipse and do some MIG welding without glasses.

      I am convinced that PhysicsScholar is both a bot and candidate for a Darwin Award.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Make your own hologram by isoteareth · · Score: 1

      Ah the joys of a semi-democratic mod system ;)

    5. Re:Make your own hologram by goon+america · · Score: 1
      Also, try to find something in the kitchen or basement that has eight segments coated with a high-quality aluminum to provide for reflectivity in steps from 10% to 80% at 45 incidence (use a ruler or tape measure for quick measurements).

      I think he was joking.

    6. Re:Make your own hologram by Jim+Morash · · Score: 1

      This makes no sense at all. What the hell?

    7. Re:Make your own hologram by The_Prophetx · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone should think a moment before flaming someone. If you look at the business end of a laser when it's not on, there is no danger. And if you're looking for dust particles then you wouldn't have the laser on now would you?

      --
      For all the things I have not the power to change.....
    8. Re:Make your own hologram by Type-R · · Score: 1

      Oh, one more thing -- the laser should be on for about a half-hour to allow it to stabilize. If it's not warmed up enough after that time and doesn't seem to be very bright at all, peek into where the light comes out while it's on to check for any dust specs that may be impacting the light's exit from the device.

      And with your remaining eye, check to see if you remembered to plug it in.....
    9. Re:Make your own hologram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peek into where the light comes out while it's on to check for any dust specs

      You shoudl read gooder.

      The original post is a joke anyway. It should be modded to funny, not informative.

    10. Re:Make your own hologram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lost your vision by staring into a laser, stands to reason the thing is plugged in...

      But please, go ahead and prove me wrong!

  17. Another impractical "3D device of the future". by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Alright guys, we have 3D that anyone wearing inexpensive, lightwieght glasses can see. I think if we put a special screen between the image and the viewer and add two expensive cameras that must be able to see and track the viewer's eye movements, we will have brought 3D imaging into the future!"

    Poppycock.

    New ways to do 3D rendering are cool, but they're never going to escape the lab unless they do something not otherwise available in a more economical package.

    1. Re:Another impractical "3D device of the future". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's wookiee with two e's

    2. Re:Another impractical "3D device of the future". by jack1323 · · Score: 1

      they're never going to escape the lab unless they do something not otherwise available in a more economical package.


      Wake up, dude. That statement applies to all forms of new technology. Give it time.

  18. Driving technology by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still the diffraction pattern from just one high-resolution hologram can easily use up more than a terabyte of data--enough to fill 1,600 compact discs

    This is the kind of technology that pushes the speed of technology forward. Not only will gigantahumongous hard drives be required to hold this data, but extremely large memories, fast processors, and fast video systems will be needed. For a few years now computers have been quite fast enough. The web only needed a certain amount of horsepower, and as much as Microsoft has tried, there really a limit to how bloated and slow IE can be made. The newer chips eat IE for lunch. That's bad news for chipmakers, because it's hard to sell faster computers to customers who are satisfied.

    This technology is not just going to help whoever develops and sells it, it's going to indirectly help everyone. Get ready for the next tech bubble in the next few years - except this time, when Greenspan says the magic words "irrational exhuberance" sell that shit.

    --
    Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    1. Re:Driving technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You wrote: except this time, when Greenspan says the magic words "irrational exhuberance" sell that shit.

      Yeah, that'll work. A bunch of people selling their stocks at the same time. That'll work FOR SURE!

      Did you get burnt, bud?

    2. Re:Driving technology by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      Not only will gigantahumongous hard drives be required to hold this data Or perhaps the holographic storage that always seems to be just beyond the horizon? ;)

    3. Re:Driving technology by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 1

      Did you get burnt, bud?

      Yup. Redhat, I don't even get a Christmas card from you!

      --
      Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
  19. Watch out, Hollywood! by jzs9783 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Think DVD home entertainment centers are stealing your revenue? Just wait until these are in every home!

  20. Sounds kinda like... by litui · · Score: 1

    ...the device in Snow Crash =)

    --
    I send you this message in order to have your advice.
  21. I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by buswolley · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That new visual, physical interfaces need to be devloped inorder for Games to really become interesting.

    For years now we have been playing games in 2D,(ok sometimes shitty 3D) and a controller with several buttons.

    All that has improved, in all these years is graphics quality, and bigger, more-in-depth games. But we continue to use the same interface to the game, therefore all games can be summed into, push this button to do x, push this button to do Y, or combinations etc.. Games have become boring to me.

    But to get real innovation in games, we need interfaces such as this hologram tech, or forced feedback suits etc.

    When I can manipualte a 3D object(like an apple)with my hands and fingers, and I can feel it, spin it etc. That is when games can become really interesting as escapes from reality.

    I know there are people working on these things, and I know that there are quite a few difficulties but, I think only then will Gaming come into its own, ESPECIALly INTERACTIVE GAMING.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    1. Re:I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 1

      >ESPECIALly INTERACTIVE GAMING

      What exactly is non-interactive gaming? Watching TV?

    2. Re:I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by buswolley · · Score: 1

      My apologies... I meant: InTERaCTIVe_with_real_Live_blood_and_caffeine_in_t heir_veins Gaming

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    3. Re:I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by buswolley · · Score: 1

      ooops i did it again I meant: InTERaCTIVe_with_humanoids_of_real_Live_blood_and_ caffeine_in_their_veins Gaming

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    4. Re:I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by jerome.sprecher · · Score: 1
      When I can manipualte a 3D object(like an apple)with my hands and fingers, and I can feel it, spin it etc. That is when games can become really interesting as escapes from reality.

      They have that already - it's called LSD.
      I think I remember seeing a PS9 commercial a while back that showed a couple of teens snorting some dust from a neat little sphere and halucinating an adventurous video game... can't wait

    5. Re:I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by buswolley · · Score: 1
      Lsd and me don't mix well. Saw a few demons.. You know, the usual. Made me a little insane for a year or so. No big deal.

      But...It is quite a trip.. But games have abit more continuity than the average LSd trip. And continuity gives games interest also

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    6. Re:I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by Jante+Loven · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      Some creep thinks he's playing that sort of *game* here lately around Washington, DC.

      I think I speak for everyone when I say, we don't much care for that level of interactivity.

      --
      ERROR: Divide Overflow in {.sig/noise } ratio
  22. star pr0n? by EngMedic · · Score: 5, Funny

    combining the Windows Messenger popup post with this one, we get:
    [popup] if you want to see the rest of Princess Leia's message, click here![/popup]
    gak.

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  23. Tag line is so true by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    "The big problem with television isn't that it's flat," Benton says. "It's that they canceled Twin Peaks after two seasons."

    Still the diffraction pattern from just one high-resolution hologram can easily use up more than a terabyte of data--enough to fill 1,600 compact discs.

    Just think what holographic pr0n would do data storage business.

  24. Holding my breath... by jaybird144 · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for this tech to be married with a video phone...as long as it's of decent quality. I'm sure that a streaming holographic projection is going to require some heavy bandwidth... Of course, what everyone will be using the new holophone for will be much akin to some posts that have been written already...holophone sex. But then again, I'm sure some of the employees of these facilities aren't going to be as happy about that...hmm. With my luck, it won't work with my GeForce 4...

  25. Stick this technology by Bobtree · · Score: 5, Interesting

    in the arcades where it belongs!

    Since home game systems have caught up with arcade hardware at low cost, there isn't a sufficient technology advantage to keep arcade gaming advantageous and afloat.

    Serious holographic displays on arcade machines would be fantastic, and home consoles wouldn't be able to touch it for many years since TV/monitor standards are so slow and entrenched.

    Note: please allow 3+ years for development and adoption, and keep your fingers crossed that arcades still exist then.

    1. Re:Stick this technology by weetabix · · Score: 1

      Dont you remember? we have already HAD a 3d game in arcades. time-something timecube orosmething it was called.
      a time travelling cowboy.

      Though seriously... 3d SFalpha? ... we can see just how "natural" chun-li is... heh.

      --

      -- "It's tough to run with both feet stuck in your mouth" - Zoe's evil side

  26. a worthwhile upgrade by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, something worth moving up to from my 12 inch CGA.

    mirror at http://www.msu.edu/~brownd41/mirror/3D/index.html

  27. A Cure for Cancer! by scottennis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I love "technical" articles that start out by announcing a new technology's potential in finding a cure for cancer. This is a sure sign that the article was written (or underwritten) by someone who is trying to sell more than advertising space (pop-up or otherwise).

    If you think this article is sincere, here are some more of today's headlines for you:
    • Microsoft Profit, Sales Up, Shares Rise on News of Windows-based Cancer Cure
    • Indonesia Appears to Signal Anti-Terror Resolve as Indonesian Doctors Close in on Cancer Cure
    • 'Rosie' Magazine Shuttered, 120 Jobs Slashed, Cancer Research Reporters Kept On
    • Jazz Forward Malone Mulls Retirement, Plans to Become National Spokesperson for American Cancer Society
  28. Parent post is a pernicious TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never look directly at the laser with your remaining eye!


    Dude, you're not funny.

  29. I don't like having my eye movement tricked. by handybundler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So do they think that people with 20/20 vision can actually view this for any length of time without casuing major eye strain, vertigous reaction, and any other focusing issue?

    --


    a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
    1. Re:I don't like having my eye movement tricked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be looking where you shouldn't be looking... because government will secretly be tracking your eye movements and storing the data in a massive FBI database! Have we no privacy? Have we no rights? Damn that Ashcroft, and his right-wing cronies! That goes double for Big Brother!

    2. Re:I don't like having my eye movement tricked. by 5alligator · · Score: 1

      ...and your game pad is hurting your thumbs. boo-fricken-hoo. i don't give a damn if it strikes viewers blind. Don't look at the thing. Life's too short - go outside and play.

  30. More than one viewer? by sssmashy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The cameras can easily isolate the viewer's bright pupils, enabling them to track the eyes and adjust the location of the shifting stripes so that they always block the image in a way that sustains the stereoscopic effect.

    Sounds wonderful, but one limitation that jumps immediately to mind is that the 3d effect is limited to a single viewer. I was reminded of the scene in "Minority Report" which shows Tom Cruise watching 3d video of his deceased wife, and then the eerie image distorion of the wife as the camera shifts from Cruise's POV to circle behind the projection.

  31. Medical uses by 0ddity · · Score: 1

    This should be great for med students learning anatomy. Being able to see things from all sides at scale could be a usefull learning tool for all kinds of things.

    Just imagine the kinds of computer games that would benefit from this as well.

  32. not really by _avs_007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even though everything is "behind glass", you are still seeing 3D. Afterall, the glass is transparent, it's not like the glass is "producing" the images...

    Besides, driving down the street, you will want some *depth* perception. What's funky are those prescription windshields... Try being a passenger in one those cars. You almost need to be stoned/drunk to survive that without a migrain.

  33. As expected.... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    1...2...3...4...5...6...7...

    Oh, just counting all the posts that included some reference to pr0n.

    ...8...9...10...11...12...[...]

  34. You want me to do what? by iSwitched · · Score: 1

    "peek into where the light comes out while it's on to check for any dust specs that may be impacting the light's exit from the device"

    Seems like staring into the business end of a laser, even a not "at all" bright one isn't a very retina-friendly activity.

    Thanks for the hearty guffaw!

    --
    "That naive cube! How long must I suffer this!" --Sheldon J. Plankton
    1. Re:You want me to do what? by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      Seems like staring into the business end of a laser, even a not "at all" bright one isn't a very retina-friendly activity.


      I don't think staring into the "business end" of ANYTHING is a very bright thing to do... However, I suppose it can be a *VERY* friendly activity....

    2. Re:You want me to do what? by 5alligator · · Score: 1

      kinda makes you wonder about goatse's friends...

  35. Super Computing? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Funny

    churning through 20 terabytes worth of information every second would require extraterrestrial technology Mental note to self: must get more hampsters...

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  36. When will Dale get out of the Black Lodge? by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    When they start making his favorite gum again?

    And what of Bob?

  37. Imagine.... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1

    Getting Goatse'd in 3D! Oh, the horror of the future! Don't bring children into such a world!

    If you can't figure out magic eyes, this one is easier to see -- you might just have to give it awhile.

    And yes, this is somewhat relevant -- it is a magic eye image of Goatse, which is an inextricable part of slashdot now that we've all been desensitized to it for 2 years.

    1. Re:Imagine.... by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      How did u come across the hiiden image? Someone is a little too interested in the site.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  38. oh no... by DRue · · Score: 1

    "Scenes or images pop-out at you and change on the fly and are viewable in full color. "

    I hope mozilla will be able to block 3D popup ads :)

  39. Back in my day... by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

    quote from article: "The big problem with television isn't that it's flat," Benton says. "It's that they canceled Twin Peaks after two seasons."

    Well, I think the bigest problem is how outdated his reference is. Next he will be complaining about how the CHiPs didn't get picked up for an additional season.

  40. Vanilla Sky by OzPhIsH · · Score: 1

    If anyone has seen the movie "Vanilla Sky," they might recall the big birthday party scene where there is a hologram of John Coltrane playing the sax. If that's the kind of technology we can expect in real life, then I'm without a doubt excited by it.

    I wonder how long it will take this kind of technology to really take off and start to infiltrate the average home. If it's done well enough, I imagine it could have to potential to send our old TV's to obsolete land. Imagine 3D TV. Hell, in enough time (far into the future here) we could be wasting our lives away in a holodeck type environment instead of on the couch. Remember that LCD-Paint that people were talking about a while back? These kinds of technologies in conjunction could change our lives, much the way tv and radio changed the lives of people when they were first introduced.

    I suppose this is a bit of a futurist vision, but when you hear about stuff like this, how can you not get excited by the possibilities? These are very exciting times my friends... very exciting..

    --

    "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

    1. Re:Vanilla Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd expect something more like orlando jones in the time machine or something first?

    2. Re:Vanilla Sky by 5alligator · · Score: 1

      yes, the holodeck is probably the best place for you.

  41. Research application: proteins and molecules by f97tosc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of research goes into undertanding how proteins and other bio molecules fold and fit together.

    This can be difficult to understand for a researcher that is looking at a flat screen. Also hard disk needs for doing this 3D would not that ridiculous, as the view from different angles can be calculated from scratch based on the chemical composition (rather than stored than having the computer storing the information of each possible angle).

    Tor

  42. Gamer's Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I already play 3d games where I view an image from all sides and it fully interacts with me. Scenes or images, in living colour, pop-out at me and change on the fly. Even better, I can interact with friends in a dynamic playing environment where different, continously moving, fully realized 3d images are viewable by all participants from all possible angles.

    It's called "sports". Get off the couch, fatties.

    1. Re:Gamer's Paradise by syrinx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next time you interact with orcs, demons, and can shoot people, get back to me, if you're just running and throwing a ball around, don't bother.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:Gamer's Paradise by falzer · · Score: 2

      > I already play 3d games where blah blah blah...
      > It's called "sports". Get off the couch, fatties.

      I'd rather play Grand Theft Auto.

    3. Re:Gamer's Paradise by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Can you replay that part where the ball took that weird bounce and hit Joey in the head? What did it look like from Joey's point of view? From overhead? Can you pause the game while the ball is in mid flight to answer the phone? Can you go into "bullet time" and do cool stuff like that? If so, sound's cool! Where do I download it?

  43. I've seen that before... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that orlando jones' character in "The Time Machine" movie that came out recently?

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

    1. Re:I've seen that before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how that thing was able to remain functional and mostly intact after ~800,000 years without any protection from the various glaciers and falling bits of moon that completely freaking obliterated the rest of the city.

  44. Or not by Morgahastu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Though it may be a while before this becomes part of our daily lives"

    If ever, probably never.

    Holographic projection systems will never become part of our daily lives until its actually a 3d image being projected into the air that EVERYONE can see, not just one person with two camera looking at him.

    1. Re:Or not by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      RTFA The blurb only discusses one of the 3D imaging systems in the article. The other is hologrphic and can be viewed by multiple people from multiple angles with out any eye-tracking.

      --
      Why not fork?
  45. Virtual Boy Reference by Q3vi1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if it'll give me the same headaches? I mean, after all that 3D pr0n, I'd already expect a headache, but what about when I'm just doing research? *sig*

  46. Ah, the marvels of technology by Brandeissansoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Imagine being able to view an image from all sides and have it interact with you" Wow! That's exactly like what I see every single day!

  47. I'd rather have... by Audacious · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..the fog machine version. At least then you can cool the computer, yourself, your popsicle, etc.... while you play. This one you probably need bifocals in order to use it. ;-)

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  48. Creative use of image by andkaha · · Score: 2

    Did you notice that the images in the top left corner of the article web pages were the one and the same on all five pages, just cropped and scaled a bit?

    Does anyone else have better images of this thing?

    --
    It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
  49. 1280x1024x???? by bheilig · · Score: 1

    1280x1024x1024 in true color is 5 gigabytes! Double that with z-page swapping (doing the work in a second section of memory, then, when the raster scan is resetting, move the contents into video memory). Finally AGP 4x has a peak transfer rate of 1 GB/s. Well, I guess by the time this tech comes to market, the rest of the hardware will be up to speed.

    Fun!

    This is a .sig

  50. IANASWG. by raehl · · Score: 2

    And the mispelling makes sure everyone knows.

  51. The future is 30 years ago by katarac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, they've been doing this kind of stuff since the 70's. Why, I'd bet that everytime me and the gang would be investigating a mystery, some embittered ex-carnival employee, or some crooked investor would use this exact same technology to project a ghost or some other apparition to scare away people who might horn in on his fortune. Oh wait... lines... between fantasy and reality... becoming clearer....forget what I just said.

    1. Re:The future is 30 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, like it was old man Dithers and he would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for us meddling kids. Get it right Fred.
      Shaggy

  52. Speculation by Trogre · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they might look something like the holo-pictures in these shots in this scene from the Attack of the Clones DVD.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  53. Accessorize it! by Sayten241 · · Score: 0

    This new technology will come available with a $10 spooge guard to protect the LCD screen from any bodily fluids.

  54. This Research by wcbrown · · Score: 1

    These researchers need to team up with MIT Media Lab's Erotic Computation Group.

  55. I've already figured out how to use it in games :) by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

    You must have thunk "so how do you display a game in 3d with such limited screen space?"...I know I did. But here's a way around it...I think.

    What you do is map your world space in a sphere (so much is 'duh'). But here's the clever thing: seeing as there must be a limit to the outer edges of your hologram, you start up a logorithmic scale from the centre of the image. So in the centre you see everything as is, but as you go out, you essentially collapse/compress space; up to a flat image on the edge of your hologram-sphere.

    Does this make sense to anyone else but me? Think Carmac will do something like this? :)

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  56. Clippit running around your desk by texchanchan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now we can get
    • Little holographic characters (Clippit and his friends)...
      • Geysering out of your computer screen into your personal space
      • Cavorting around on your keyboard singing about Chevrolets or cold drinks or overdue upgrades
      • Acting out tiny love scenes or fight scenes to grab your attention
    • Or a full-sized holographic hand reaching out to hold yours, saying "Would you like suggestions on style? May I recommend the Palatino font?"
    • at which a printer, complete with leather apron, leaps out holding up a proof sheet using YOUR doc's words
    • until a Tyrannosaurus Rex bounds upon the scene and gobbles all the other holograms, only to turn to you and say "Hey, [YOUR NAME], tired of intrusive software? Get NO-Zilla the holo killa! Only $39.95!"


  57. Re:I've already figured out how to use it in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah it makes sense and it's a cool ass idea. My friend is trying to figure out some cool way to make maps like this, where the center is photo-realistic from say terraserver, and then it goes to topo where the rez decreases at the edge or something. Anyhow so it looks cool but employs the effect you are talking about- projected to 2d for cool posters that say, "X place - the center of the world.", sell them to vacationers, bigger fad than those euro-letter stickers on the car.

  58. The Next Generation? by Dannon · · Score: 2

    I thought we were supposed to have large rooms which could holographically take on the appearance of any environment by The Next Generation, complete with lifelike artificial characters? Not to mention warp drives, food replicators, and a sentient android....

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  59. wha...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is interesting to see what the kind of research being done on this.

    It is interesting to see what kind of education editors using done on this site.

  60. Help Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help me Obi-wan Kenobe...must read slashdot in 3D!

  61. Disney Land by SlashdotMakesMeKool · · Score: 0

    How did they do that thing at Disney Land, where, inside the Toontown houses, there were 3D floating images inside a glass ball. That was really impressive. Anyone know what I'm talking about? Or did I just imagine it. That's been around for 10 yrs+, and they were/are very realistic.

    --

  62. Imagine... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    ... pop-ups on the web that actually display in front of you, circle around your head. Wouldn't it be the worst thing to see a pink gorilla lunge at you from your monitor with the "INTERACT WITH YOUR PC" embedded into your retina? :(

  63. Minority Report, 3D by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Transparent panel between you and the display... like maybe a Store Window?

    Busty Babe in Store Window: "Hi, [your name], I notice you like walking. How about a pair of Nike PaveHuggers?"
    You: Huh?
    Babe [tracking your eye movement]: Oh, do you like my boobs? Check out my personal website. I just sent the URL to your PDA. [Licks lips] Will I see you later?

    1. Re:Minority Report, 3D by Howzer · · Score: 2
      And sadly, that whole idea was the cleverest, most breathtaking thing in the film.

      But that didn't stop it somehow being rated Top 250 by imdb (#91 when I looked).

      What is up with that? Even Mr Cranky didn't entirely hate it.

      Bad Idea for the Morning: Hey! I should do a review site and post how much this movie sucked. Or maybe I should just get another Oola-flavoured-beverage and shut the fskc up. Yeah. The second one.

  64. Is costing a lot is gonna stop this? by nackrm · · Score: 1

    ...acknowledges that a working system is likely decades away and could be "ridiculously expensive."

    Sounds like something for the US military to get into. I can already feel my taxes going up.

    --

    Be a man! View at -1
    acm.cs.uwec.edu
  65. Holography stereoscopic 3D by rufusdufus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Holograms do more than simply stereoscopic 3D. A hologram encodes the entire wavefront of the image, not just two positions like 3d goggles or other cheesy steroscopic devices.

    This differences is substantial: the amount of information presented to the eye is vastly larger than simple stereoscopic methods. In a simple stereoscopic image, all objects and surfaces appear to be in the same focus plane. Holographic images essentially gain a 3rd axis of resolution by adding a very large number of focus points in 3 space.

    This also allows for true perspective wherein different viewpoints provide different information. You can 'look behind' objects in a hologram, which you cannot do with steroscopic tricks.

    Thus, true holograms provide a qualitativly better experience over existing 3d methods.

  66. view an image from all sides and have it interact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, that's called a "girlfriend". Most people don't have access to that technology yet, it seems.

  67. I knew some fucker would post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...an obligatory "Help me Obi-Wan" reference. Stop posting this every time there's a new story about holographics! It's an old joke! Almost as much as those damn business plans!

  68. Haven't they learned anything from Trek? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holodeks always break down and take over the ship or house with weird characters out of books.

    Stop this stuff now!

  69. Could this be a new business plan?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Post poorly spelt holographic Princess Leia comment
    2. ???
    3. Profit!
  70. Aside from 3d in games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... The best potential I see (being a Med student), is in virtual surgery. Imagine the potential. We can now cut open virtual cadiver instead of a real one! We can do things which we are not ethically allowed right now! And from all that... um.. we can learn a bit more about the human anatomy. Good!

  71. The Haunted House by Mastagunna · · Score: 1

    This head you refer to is in the haunted house, there is also a Buzz Lightyear version. I am asuming that they are simply a 3D screen, with a specially edited video. The video is designed with the particular globe/space helmut in mind, and apears 3d when projected on the screen. A system like this could probably be used with a computer generated images now, but creating a realtime 3d image from a video source would be much harder.

  72. 3d pron!! hmmmm by beta21 · · Score: 1

    Wow imagine that beautiful girl with boobies diefying gravity following your eye movements....

    This will be the driving force for this technology!

  73. Oh, you mean in games like this...? by ashitaka · · Score: 2
    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  74. "I think George Lucas is gonna sue somebody!" by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    Imagine being able to view an image from all sides and have it interact with you.

    Help me, Obi-Wan Kanobi, you're are only hope.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  75. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not funny. Not ironic. Not clever. Not even fucking relevant.

    Mod it down. All the way down. Susano Otter can lick my balls.

  76. I like the Big Pictures.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the ads are bigger. Or maybe that was the point....

  77. What has happened to Slashdot? by jonr · · Score: 2

    Are 90% of the audience of Beavis and Butthead intelligence? A real breakthrough appears in 3D technology, and most of the comments are stupid remarks regarding Star Wars, 3D in real life (DUH!) and how this would be great in the porn industry!
    If you don't have anything to say, that is on topic, STFU!
    J.

    1. Re:What has happened to Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely the references to Pron are valid, given that 90% of todays internet profits are made by the pron industry ???

      and star wars rules !!!

      can't handle some light hearted nonsense, go read some hardware reviews or something....

  78. *yawn* by porksoda · · Score: 0

    would someone wake me up when the first holo-porn program is developed?
    `nite

  79. You are a faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for your wonderful contribution to the discussion of this story. It wouldn't have been quite the same without a bunch of little asshole-licking faggots like you posting stupid comments just to get karma points.

    AC

  80. Re:Gamer's Paradise (clarification) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scenes or images, in living colour, pop-out at me and change on the fly. Even better, I can interact with friends in a dynamic playing environment where different, continously moving, fully realized 3d images are viewable by all participants from all possible angles.

    Just to clarify, the parent post was actually referring to "rimjob olympics", a series of games played annually by closet homosexuals.

  81. Note: these aren't technically holograms by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry to be pedantic, but holograms are created with interference patterns using a laser on specially treated photographic materials.

    What's referred to here are not, infact, holograms by definition. It's merely a 3D display technology.

    (Holography is a hobby of mine...it's amazing how much fun a guy in his bathroom can have with a laser and some chemicals!).

    -psyco

    1. Re:Note: these aren't technically holograms by bytesmythe · · Score: 2
      holograms are created with interference patterns using a laser on specially treated photographic materials

      How is the main technique described in the article not a hologram? It specifically involves shining a split laser through a material that contains an interference pattern. The only difference is the interference pattern is created by calculated soundwaves passing through a stack of tellurium-oxide crystals, instead of using film.

      No one ever said the depicted object has to actually exist for it to be a hologram...

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  82. Bite me by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    Go suck on a bog-lolly, urinal-breath.

  83. The last thing we need... by newestbob · · Score: 0

    ...are pop-up ads that hit you in the head.

  84. practical for invisibility by cowtamer · · Score: 2

    So this brings us one step closer to an invisibility cloak. Simply plaster these displays on the sides of a box, find a "victim" (i.e., person to whom you want to be invisible), track his movements and pipe the stereo image that would be behind you...

    If we get thisworking with multiple people, I'm sure people might pay for this. Otherwise it might be a nice parlor trick...

    (perhaps I should patent this idea...but here it is on slashdot as 'prior art')

  85. Great Expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...These are very exciting times my friends... very exciting..."

    This is so true. It also strikes me as something one of our Foundering Fathers would have written during the creation of the New World - (US Citizen bias alert, although I guess it could reference the beginnings of any nation...)

  86. does eye pupil tracking really work ? by master_p · · Score: 1

    What if i blink, close my eyes due to some dust particle, turn my head around real quick, etc etc ? Do the users have to be trained on how to turn their heads ? what happens with people with narrow or small eyes ? I doubt it will be successful...it will be like voice-commanding: a lot of training would be needed to the point that it will be useless.

    Another point is that two cameras are needed for each person. That means multiview 3d displays is out of the question.

    I don't understand why they don't do the simple thing: arrange "pixels" in a cube; each cubic pixel will either be transparent or lighted up with a combination of red, green, blue color, most probably using some fluorecent substance that is lighted on electricity. The cube will be visible from most sides, except from the bottom one that the power lines will run through. I think technology is up to the point where power lines can be invisible from the eye :-).

    By the way, geeks of the future will deny entering the virtual environments of the day; they will go out in nature, because it will be the geeky thing to do, whereas everybody else will jump into their virtual costume more and more! yeap, The Matrix got it right, I think.

  87. *em* Dosn't this sound, like...*em*. by danalien · · Score: 1

    *em* a monitor (display), were instead of pointing around with a mouse, you have two cameras traking your eyes? With some fancy-smancy transparent stereoscopic LCD "that makes the picture come alive"?

    Couldn't they say it plain-simple? Or must they "puff-it-up" so it sounds waayyy-more Cool than it is?... well, well, I gues that's modern capitalism for you.... trying to deceive you too screw you over for [some] more $$$-signs.

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  88. Back to the Future by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    Just great, bad enough I get pop ups in my browser, the possibility of popup spam on the Wintel box at work, but now I may have to put up with pop up sharks from Jaws XI like poor Marty McFly did in Back to the Future.

    Seriously though, while this is fairly cool, it could also lead to some extremely annoying street advertisements on the sides of buildings. Its bad enough to have billboards everywhere, but now ones which can actively annoy you in 3D? UGH!

    That and maybe all bartenders being replaced by the Max Headroom version of Ronald Reagan.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  89. Yeah... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

    That's what I thought until I READ THE FCUKING ARTICLE. You might want to try that occasionally.

    Because the new video holograms produce fully 3-D images that float in space near the viewing screen, they can be examined from different angles by multiple viewers.

  90. Cool... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    I know I am super late on this, but what the hell...

    This is cool technology, and does have obvious practical uses as outlined in the article. But it will never replace the potentials offered by HMDs (Head Mounted Displays).

    HMDs offer the the one thing you can't get from a 3rd person perspective - immersion. Unfortunately, HMDs still have some serious drawbacks, the greatest of which is the fixed focus. Some HMDs are supposedly focused at "infinity", but they are still fixed focus in that there is no way to create the different levels of focus that the real world offers the eyes - everything is at the same distance. Thus, your eyes do not change focus as they do in the real world, which leads to eye strain. Once this issue is overcome, and issues relating to FOV (field of view) vs. resolution (namely you can't get a big FOV with high resolution yet for any reasonable amount of money - it is always a trade off) are surmounted, the ability to work and play in simulated VEs (virtuals environments) for long periods of time will become a reality.

    That is what I am waiting for...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  91. [OT] New sport: troll-hunting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm, trying to make that awful goat place ontopic, yet in her journal, she admits to being a troll...

    http://slashdot.org/~SexyKellyOsbourne/journal/

    Read it for yourself!

    "My entire post archive is nothing but trolls, flamebait, and erroneous-information-filled karma whoring, and yet I now have enough karma to post at +2. I even did an early goatse link that didn't get modded down for at least an entire hour."

  92. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the
    Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun.
    Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an
    utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life
    forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches
    are a pretty neat idea ...
    -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...