Slashdot Mirror


Portable CD-RW/DVD Player

BugNuker writes "If your CD/MP3 player wasn't enough, you have to check this out. Sony has released this all in one media device that can play mp3's, wma's, cd's, and DVD's... yes, DVD's. It can be hooked up to your computer, and be used as a CD-RW and then hooked up to your TV, and play your favorite DVD's. But can it play my mp3's recorded on my DVD? Ultimate media device I would say, same size as a personal cd player. Comes with a Memory Stick expansion slot, a rechargeable battery and a USB 2.0/1.1 interface." There's a picture. It's cute. And expensive.

269 comments

  1. Expensive???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have seen portable DVD players for under $300.

    This thing sounds like a bargain to me.

    1. Re:Expensive???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but, this machine does not have a display for playing DVD's.

    2. Re:Expensive???? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You hook it up to your TV, there you go. $300 is very resonable for an external CD-RW/DVD alone. Let alone all the portable features of mp3 etc..

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    3. Re:Expensive???? by ClumzyKid · · Score: 1

      "I have seen portable DVD players for under $300"

      Even so... $300 for an mp3/dvd/cdrw... and plus it's a SONY! lol It's more than just a bargain! I've never been to the US or the UK in that matter to know how the prices are for electronic/computer equipment... but knowing the value of a dollar to the curreny we use here (Cyprus £).. something like $1=0.68 cy-cents (well something like that)... it's a steal considering that it's a brand name.

      Obviously the price of import would notch the price even more... + profit... if you intend to buy on the market... but if bought online at that price! Wooohooo.... I'd go for it...

      --
      Great ideas happen at 4am. Bad career moves happen at 4pm...
    4. Re:Expensive???? by Eight+01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It will not play DVDs to a TV. It only acts as an external drive to allow DVDs to be played on a computer. My guess is that it has no MPEG2 circuitry and relies on the computer to do all decoding.

      This is what it does:
      Portable CD player - regular and Mp3 cds
      External CD-R/W drive and DVD ROM drive

      Maybe its just me, but this is no big deal. Portable CD/MP3 players can be had for under $100 dollars, and almost everyone already has a CD burner / DVD ROM in their computer.

      If you need to make CDRs while you are on the road, this may be useful, but I'd be surprised if you couldn't already get an external CD burner for under $300.

      To Sony, I say "big deal".

    5. Re:Expensive???? by ClumzyKid · · Score: 1

      Erm.... you mean it doesn't have a screen on it to watch DVDs? There isn't much of a point... DVD movies are better off on a BIGGER screen! It's really a matter of practicality here... I like the idea of being able to watch dvd movies at any of my friends places... like ones who may not have a dvd player... or if i travel.. i can watch dvds wherever i go.... just hook up to a dvd and or puter and enjoy?! it's the same notion with the MP3... it's practicallity... not service...

      --
      Great ideas happen at 4am. Bad career moves happen at 4pm...
    6. Re:Expensive???? by ClumzyKid · · Score: 1

      "just hook up to a dvd and or puter and enjoy?!" lol I meant hook up to a tv and enjoy!!!...

      --
      Great ideas happen at 4am. Bad career moves happen at 4pm...
    7. Re:Expensive???? by macrom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure you can get external drives cheaper, but they are usually enclosed in a 5.25" external case, making transportation of the unit cumbersome. This device, by all appearances, will slip into a side pocket of a laptop bag. Add that it doubles as a portable CD player (which can't be said of a dedicated drive), a DVD player (which may be said of a traditional external drive, but if you built your own), an MP3 player AND it has Memory Stick capabilites, which can't be said of any external CD burner that I know of. Acquiring all of the requisite hardware for the same price is not an issue, but getting all of the functionality in the same lightweight, small-footprint device is an issue for those the live on airplanes/airports and their ilk.

      One additional bonus that this device presents laptop users : most modern laptops have some sort of swapable drive bay that houses the optical drive but will also house a second battery. With this (IMO, relatively inexpensive) drive, you can add a second battery but still retain portability and optical drive connectivity.

    8. Re:Expensive???? by damiangerous · · Score: 5, Informative
      Portable CD/MP3 players can be had for under $100 dollars

      Portable CD/MP3/DVD players can be had for under $100. The only link I can find has them for $107, but my local Target has one on clearance for ~$70.

    9. Re:Expensive???? by Cyn · · Score: 1

      It will not play DVDs to a TV.

      from the 'article'
      "When connected to a television or PC, the device can also become a DVD player for watching movies."

      I saw this on news.com a day or two ago, and noted this feature then too. Check your articles :)

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    10. Re:Expensive???? by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 2

      We should make it clear that the Target one is prettier than the one you linked. It's slimmer and the one I saw was "fashionably colored". Still to big to really be useful for anything but DVD. I'd worry about thermal issues also, in a case that tight.

      Of course, neither of these makes CD-R/W like the Sony product this article's about.

      --
      All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    11. Re:Expensive???? by Eight+01 · · Score: 1
      Well, the article says:

      When connected to a computer, the MPD-AP20U acts as a DVD-ROM drive for viewing DVD movies, and as a Memory Stick media reader for viewing, saving and transferring files, Sony says.
      When away from the computer, the drive then works as a stand-alone CD player that can play standard audio CDs, and MP3 or WAV files from a CD, DVD or Memory Stick.

      No mention of being able to play DVDs while away from a computer.

    12. Re:Expensive???? by Eight+01 · · Score: 1
      Wait, it gets worse. From the official Sony press release:

      Battery life: up to 10 hours continuous MP3 CD playback, up to four hours CD-DA playback, up to one-and-a-half hours DVD video playback

      So, in other words, the battery's official specs give it enough power to make it through one showing of a 90 minute movie. Factor in the usual reduction in battery life vs. the official claim, and this drive will come in well short of being able to play a standard length film. Want to watch Lord of the Rings? Better have 3 sets of fully charged batteries in addition to your laptop.

  2. FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been waiting for one of these for like 4 years, ever since I bought a Sony Glasstron. For those that don't know those are the "glasses" with the equivelent of a 56 inch tv inside. Now I can watch p0rn on the airplane without my seat-mate complaining about the moaning.

    1. Re:FINALLY by guidemaker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now I can watch p0rn on the airplane without my seat-mate complaining about the moaning.

      Perhaps you should moan more quietly, then?

    2. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they'll be complaining about the cursing! "What the hell? No video output?!?!?"

      But you can use it as a $300 CD player if you want their sympathy.

    3. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I learned how not to moan after 3 years of phone sex

      3 years? You must be the fucking *GOD* of tantric sex?

    4. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the God of Loserdom. Probably that.

    5. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks good - but being Sony it will have "strong" region coding (ie no widely "leaked" trivial hacks). Probably not much problem to the US but rather more restrictive for this side of the Atlantic (England).

    6. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard it put in so many words but yeah :)

    7. Re:FINALLY by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      What's the point in watching porn if you can't jack off at the same time?

      What do you think those blankets they give you on the airplane are for?

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  3. cute, but.... by Captain_Stupendous · · Score: 0, Insightful

    But does it play Ogg Vorbis?

    --


    I am alone, yet I also surf the universal backwash of undifferentiated Being, which is LOVE.
    1. Re:cute, but.... by BeneathTheVeil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Drat... beat me to the obligatory "but does it play [enter open source format of choice here]?" quote.

      What I want to know though is, does it play DivX files? That would be pretty neat if it did.

    2. Re:cute, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ugh. How does this get modded insightful. Everytime a multimedia device like this is mentioned on slashdot at least one person has to ask about Ogg Vorbis. It is getting to be like the Beowolf and 1,2,3 Profit posts. Mod it redundant and teach them a lesson.

    3. Re:cute, but.... by Mupp252 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try not to think of it in those terms... think of it as the formula below:

      Hey does it run [ Insert open source alternative that may not be as good as a pay product but automaticially cool because I know of the program and I sound intelligent. ] ??

      Just wondering I just got a new [ Insert cool ass piece of hardware that just came out 2 weeks ago and want to post about it because I think by bragging about cool hardware I will automaticially get mod points. ] and I wanna try it out.

    4. Re:cute, but.... by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya. I'm still holding out on a new "walkman(tm)". I still have an old casset/radio sony sport waterproof walkman that I use. I'd really like to get one that uses CF or SmartMedia cards so I can ditch the cassets. I just refuse to go the MP3 way. Nothing against MP3 except I'd prefer to deal with only Ogg files on my system. So it would be nice if at least one company stepped up and offered the ability to do Ogg on one of these devices.

    5. Re:cute, but.... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not really.

      Ogg Vorbis has better audio quality than MP3. Someone who just wants better quality would say the same thing.

      Furthermore, supporting *wma* (also rarely used and lower quality than vorbis) costs money and doesn't have a lot of point.

    6. Re:cute, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so it doesn't play your favorite format, but we have to standardise on something don't we?

      I'm not complaining it doesn't support Super Audio CD. Or that it doesn't have a FireWire port, etc.

      BTW. Can someome post a pointer to a Ogg - MP3 - DCC - MiniDisc - CD - SACD - DVD-Audio sound quality comparision?

      sorry, for being a coward.

      moondog

    7. Re:cute, but.... by rootlocus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would consider it more "Informative" than "Insitghtful" but, that's just me..

      The reason so many people ask about Ogg Vorbis is because they are actually interested in supporting the format..

      If there were some feature missing from a product that you were interested in, don't you think that posting a message about it in a public forum would be a good way to raise awareness of that feature?... Also note that when you follow a link to the story, there is a section there for posting comments too.. And the first comment that you see, is "Does it support ogg?"... Probably a slashdotter that followed the link, but still.. People are trying to get the word out, not troll..

      Personally, I agree with the poster, and many other posters, in saying that I won't be buying a player until someone comes out with one that supports Ogg... It's simply a better format...

      In comparison, I think that buying a device without Ogg support would be like buying a really fancy cassette player.. Just like CDs sound better than casettes, Oggs sound better than MP3s.. I'm not just making that statement based on what I've read elsewhere.. I have actually taken several songs and encoded them both ways, at various bitrates to compare for myself..

    8. Re:cute, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This coming from a guy who posts automatically at -1? You must be a real quality fellow.

    9. Re:cute, but.... by Dr.Luke · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is when are we going to be able to run Linux on a Beowolf cluster of these things?

    10. Re:cute, but.... by what+do+i+have+to+do · · Score: 1

      more importantly, does it play mpc files?!? i bet if either one of these formats got coverage in the media, it would slowly blow up much like mp3's did. TV people, its the morons way to start a social movement!

    11. Re:cute, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget...

      Can you make a Beowolf Cluster outta them?

  4. Why not just get a notebook? by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not just get a notebook with the same features? It won't be that much more expensive and would be a whole lot more useful than a portable DVD drive without a screen.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    1. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by marc_gerges · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because this fits in my shoulder bag, I can take it jogging with me, it shows my movies in the hotel room and weighs less than my notebook battery plus charger.

    2. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by G�tz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The cheapest notebook on the D*ll page you've linked has a price tag of $979.
      $979 vs. $300, see the difference?

    3. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by guidemaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Notebooks don't have as good battery life as portable players, but that doesn't make up for the lack of a screen. And notebook screens are about twice the size as the screens on most of the portable DVDs I've seen.

      What's the use of a portable DVD without a screen? So you can take it upstairs and watch DVDs on your portable in bed, or the kids can do the same. Or you can visit friends who haven't bought DVD yet, and take along a movie to watch.

      The portability alone has a use even without a screen. And if you're really sad, you can use the opportunity to listen to a director's commentary without the pictures - most of the time with commentaries you might as well have sound-only.

    4. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Call me a fascist, but whoever coined the term "notebook" to mean a portable PC should be shot!

      It's a laptop, damnit! Notebooks are pads of paper which you write stuff in!

    5. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and add a dvd burner to your desktop and you can take a roadtrip with one dvd of mp3s in your player

    6. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by selderrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      yeah, jogging while watching a DVD...

      I'd pay an entrance fee just to see you do that.

    7. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Hmm. $300 vs. $979+. Yup. Not that much more expensive.

      Given the choice, I'd get both. Not given the choice, I'd get the Sony (providing its not neutered by DRM), otherwise it'd be an iPod or one of Creative's devices.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    8. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah! You guys have it easy nowadays.. Picture me freezing my butt off with snow up to my neck up here in cold Norway. In those days, we strapped UNIVACs on our backs just to hear the funny noises from the vacuum tubes while jogging in the cold, coold winter.

      I guess it's one of those things that makes me me, and not skinny weaklings carrying small fart-sized discs in their shoulderbags.

    9. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by $rtbl_this · · Score: 3, Funny

      And laptops are where cats sleep, curl up purring or pad until they draw blood. There's no escape from ambiguity.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
    10. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did it to distinguish the smaller computers we know as "Laptops" today from those huge briefcase sized portable monsters that were the original "Laptops"...

    11. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by MikeDX · · Score: 1

      yeah, jogging while watching a DVD...

      I'd pay an entrance fee just to see you do that.


      Funny, I thought of it differently. Buring a CD whilst jogging. Maybe record the soothing sound of somebody out of breath running around the park.

      Actually, take it another step further, have a DVD-R and RECORD yourself jogging and then watch it afterwards! :)

    12. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fuckin' fascist.

    13. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

      Well, probably because the Dell costs like 4x as much, is gigantic, and probably weighs like 10 times as much.

      Not to mention the fact that lots of people already have laptops that don't have some of these features, and might like to keep using 'em. I have a nice Sony laptop myself, and honestly this thing seems pretty interesting. The one I got was pretty small (the vaio SR33k), and only has one PCMICA (sp?) slot, which is now taken up by a wifi card.

      The only thing that sucks is the lack of a Firewire interface, since my laptop has one, and I'd rather use that then USB :P (I've only got USB1). In fact, I feel kind of gypped that it doesn't have it. Ah well. Not that I have $300 to spend anyway. But if I did.

      It would also be nice if it could burn DVDs.

    14. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by tsa · · Score: 2

      Lapburner would be a better term for many notebooks :-)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is, you could call them a Portable-battery-or-AC-powered-flat-panel-monitor- enabled-personal-computing-device-with-integrated- keyboard-and-pointing-device-with-optional-removab le-media-and-fixed-hard-drive.
      I dare you to find any ambiguity in that. BTW, I realize this can apply to Apple products as well, that is intentional. For short you can call them PBoAPFPMEPCDwIKaPDwORMaFHD. Maybe we should just call them a 'notebook computer' instead, and lacking the word 'computer' it changes to the default context of a bound-set-of-pages-designed-to-be-used-with-writin g-implements-for-the-storage-of-textual-data that most people associate with notebook.

    16. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by kesuki · · Score: 2

      you should look into a firewire-ide bridge device then. on the cheap you can get old full height SCSI racks, with a bridge screwed onto the back so you can use IDE devices externally. or for a little more money you can get a light weight unit, that only holds a single 5-1/2 drive. although then you can't use it for mp3 playback standalone, you could add CD-rw and DVD playback capabilities. However, your HD on an older laptop couldn't keep up with DVD-r technology, my Inspiron 8100 is barely capable of doing 1x DVD burns, and it has a 30 gig HD... for 2x DVD even the 5400 rpm laptop drives might not be able to keep up.

    17. Re:Why not just get a notebook? by cancrman · · Score: 2

      Sony already makes something like this. It's not as small as the unit we're discussing, but it's also less than 1/2 of the price. The Sony Psyc DVD player.

      Kinda stupid looking though.

      --
      The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
  5. Play mp3's off DVD? by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Informative
    But can it play my mp3's recorded on my DVD?

    "When away from the computer, the drive then works as a stand-alone CD player that can play standard audio CDs, and MP3 or WAV files from a CD, DVD or Memory Stick."

    Damn, sure sounds like it to me.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    1. Re:Play mp3's off DVD? by TGK · · Score: 1

      But why?

      I've got a first generation portable CD-R player with MP3 playback. That's 10 hours per disk, or roughly 175 3 min songs.

      Honestly, that's enough for me. I know they built in MP3 support from the DVD because, honestly, it didn't cost anything to do that. Nonetheless, it's overkill.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:Play mp3's off DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not overkill if they have decent navigation, id3 support, and the battery life isnt shit.

      those cd palyer based players suck for those reasons.

      get an archos anyday. (and NOT an overpriced iPod)

    3. Re:Play mp3's off DVD? by Rader · · Score: 2

      Not if you happen to store your MP3 collection on DVD-r.

    4. Re:Play mp3's off DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but with 1.5 hours of DVD-R playback time you would be better off burning your MP3s to a CD-R.

      1.5 hours is just about enough time to get 3/4 of the way through your favorite DVD movie too!

    5. Re:Play mp3's off DVD? by curunir · · Score: 2

      From the product page (http://www.storagebysony.com/cd-rw/product.asp?id =185)

      Compatible Media:
      CD-ReWritable (CD-RW)
      CD-Recordable (CD-R)
      CD-ROM
      DVD-ROM


      Note the absence of DVD-R

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  6. what about mini-disks by JThaddeus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just replaced my son's Sony mini-disk player (on a Circuit City warranty) and it is slick. Why don't we see more for the mini-disk here in the US?

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    1. Re:what about mini-disks by frozenray · · Score: 1

      I own three MD units (home, car, portable). I bought them years ago because I was utterly disgusted with the compact cassette and had sworn to myself to eliminate all tape-based media from my household.

      Bad timing, as it turned out. I will not buy a MD unit again and am looking to get rid of my existing equipment and replace them with some kind of harddisk-based digital player. The concept of removable 74/80 min. discs looks terribly outdated today - compare it with the convenience of an iPod or similar device. No more juggling with discs in the car (and no, a MD-changer is _not_ a good solution), no more hassles with titling, no more SCMS or similar crapola issues, fast transfers from the PC which serves as my ripping station, thousands or hours of music at my fingertips, organized the way I want it.

      I realize some of my gripes with MD (only single-speed transfers to MD) could be solved by buying newer gear (NetMD), but there are additional restrictions coming with it, and I'm not willing to spend even more money to get rid of some the screw-ups the designers made in my second-generation gear.

      MD is not bad, but today I can have better. Oh, and the MD format is controlled by Sony - thanks, but no thanks.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    2. Re:what about mini-disks by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Because MiniDisc sucks ass.

      Seriously, why buy into a proprietary format which none of your friends have a player for, has almost no pre-recorded music, and doesn't sound very good (sorry, ATRAC compression is as bad as MP3 to my ears)? CD-R(w) is cheaper, can be played almost anywhere, and can even be used for things other than music. With CD-R, you can choose between uncompressed audio, mild compression that holds much more than MD and sounds better, or higher compression where you can put ten albums on a single disc (and still not sound much worse than MD).

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  7. VCDs by gerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it play them? If it's "all" in one, and i'm payin 300 clams, i sure as hell hope it gets up and gets me a beer too.

    1. Re:VCDs by kc2dpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeesh! You guys are a whiny bunch. $300 doesn't seem like a lot to me for all that functionality. Granted, it'll be 1/3 that in a year, but that's a normal price for new technology.

    2. Re:VCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not, if it already has mp3 and dvd functionality, mpeg1 and mpeg2(for svcds) would be trivial to include

      thats why damn near every dvd player includes support for it.

      even the ultra cheap walmart special

    3. Re:VCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it does not have MPEG1 or MPEG2 built in. It has an MP3 decoder built in, but for video decoding it requires a computer. That is why the article says that it can only play DVDs while plugged into a computer.

    4. Re:VCDs by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      This question is significant to me also. If it doesn't play VCD and SVCD, I'm not buying one. If it does, I probably will buy one. It's too cool a device (at that price) not to... But seriously, I have more SVCDs than DVDs (whistles casually) so SVCD is a deal-maker-or-breaker for me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:VCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that must be awesome for you, are you aware that that's stealing? stealing is wrong. you therefore a bad person and should be kicked down a flight of stairs!!!! stairs!!!!!!

  8. KINDA IRONIC by r_arr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how Sony's Movie and music branch feel about this. On one side you have Sony telling people to burn DVD's cd-rw's and other stuff. While the other side says don't do that.

    1. Re:KINDA IRONIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does not burn DVDs (only CD-RW), still, give them six months ........

    2. Re:KINDA IRONIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "up to four hours of CD audio playback, up to 10 hours of MP3 CD playback and up to 1.5 hours of DVD-ROM playback"

      Looks sufficiently crippled to me.

    3. Re:KINDA IRONIC by onion2k · · Score: 2

      Its not ironic in the slightest. Recordable media does actually have uses aside from backing up Kazaa. Even Sony realise this.

  9. Well... by Lobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This thing looks neat! BUT considering Sony's use of DRM in it's players, I wonder just how useful this thing really is?

    --

    -------
    Bite Me Fanboy!!
    1. Re:Well... by technix4beos · · Score: 1

      what, you mean the glue?

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BeOS rocks. Did they ever release OpenGL or BONE support?

    3. Re:Well... by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      What about that memorystick garbage? Nothing else I have uses it. I don't believe it's even a standard form factor. I'd much rather have CF.

  10. Sony is actually two companies? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What's going on with Sony? One half is doing stuff like this and the other half release their NetMD minidisc line with so much DRM crowbarred into it, that it's cumbersome and annoying to use.

    What happens in there? Does one team produce cool stuff and then try and sneak it out before the music side get their claws into it? Or is this clearly a case of two different companies (or should I say cultures and ideals) releasing products under the same name?

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by guidemaker · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What's going on with Sony? One half is doing stuff like this and the other half release their NetMD minidisc line with so much DRM crowbarred into it, that it's cumbersome and annoying to use.

      How depressing must it be to be a product developer in there, busting a gut to produce neat stuff that people will love, only to have the weasels in legal forcing them to eviscerate the product with ill-considered DRM?

    2. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by dackroyd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sony is way, way more than two companies. You can find their list of subsidaries in Japan and outside Japan, which seems to be about 85 companies.

      The subsidaries seem to be free to act as they see fit and their seems to be very little interference in how they are run from the Sony group company.

      Just the computer games divisions are divided into Sony Computer Entertainment Japan (SCEI*), Sony Computer Entertainment America(SCEA) and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe(SCEE). All of these companies are separate entities, with seperate responsibilities and ideas about how they should be doing business.

      *Yes I know it should be SCEJ, but it isn't, okay?

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    3. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by marc_gerges · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Large corporations typically are divided into various legal entitites in different country, to maximize on government grant, subsidies, local taxation and such. Totally apart from that there's businesses/business units/segments/whatever you call them that deal with different products, markets or technologies. Explaining different directions within such a monster by referring to its legal entities doesn't make that much sense...

    4. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Rader · · Score: 2

      Hey, they gotta make some money to afford all those lawyers and lawsuits!

    5. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Besides being a giant zaibatsu with dozens and dozens of subsidiaries, Sony basically embraces the hydra approach. Many heads, all attacking. Like AOL/TW, they straddle the media divide, so it gets a bit schizophrenic at times.

      While there are certainly folks at Sony who are right in there with the whole DRM thing, I think what happens is that the hardware sales have a polarizing effect on these efforts within Sony.

      Look at their competition with MS in the game space. Sony knows that, push comes to shove, they sell TVs and Walkmans and Glasstrons, and Microsoft sells the occasional keyboard or router. They will price MS right out of the market on the PS2 (in fact, they are already turning a profit on those things), while selling all the hardware they are known for. Microsoft cannot lean on an alternative revenue stream so heavily... although they do have that ridiculous war-chest in the bank. Investors won't stand for raiding it without a visible means of putting that money back, though.

      Sony can do this, and the tech industry is simply that much bigger than the media industry. Hell, Sony co-invented the CD; I think they actually take a tiny bit of profit from every CD-based game sold on the Xbox (someone correct me if I'm wrong about that; I know the PS2 has some CD-based games, some -DVD).

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    6. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Sony these "segments" are not just legally distinction, so it is a good way of explianing it to people who listen.

    7. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Ryokurin · · Score: 2

      There were issues in the past with the PS2 development when SCEI announced their intentions to let the PS2 function as a DVD player. Sony Electronics didnt like it because they saw it undercutting their business. Of course SCEI won out probably because Sony makes more money there than with Electronics. The game business actually kept Sony profitable as a whole several times in the past.

      I expect the same thing happened with NetMD as well. Sony Music is more of a money maker so DRM was included.

    8. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Yes I know it should be SCEJ, but it isn't, okay?

      Hmmm...I would have thought it would be SCEN (Don't the Japanese refer to their own country as Nippon?)

    9. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's Sony Computer Entertainment Inc (or at least, that's what the BIOS for Japanese PSXs is copyrighted to).

    10. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or SCEN, for "Nippon."

    11. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      This is their English name. Why use "Nippon" when the Western world won't know what the hell that means?

      Oh, and Google is your friend. Google [ nippon nihon usage ].

      Finally, SCEI stands for Sony Computer Entertainment Incorporated. Look at the title of this page, for fuck's sake.

    12. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh, you're the same AC as the other guy who recommended this, aren't you.

      MOLON.

    13. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by JazFresh · · Score: 1
      *Yes I know it should be SCEJ, but it isn't, okay?

      Actually, there is an SCEJ. They're the Product Development side of Sony Computer Entertainment that makes games for PlayStation consoles.

      I second your point about SCEI/A/E (and K for Korea, don't forget!) being separate companies. PlayStation game developers know by now that each SCE territory may have very different philosophies to its sister companies.

      Sony is a huge entity. It employs over 190,000 people. It is not a 'hive mind' with a single direction or set of values, but most people probably think that it is, as it's more convenient to anthropomorphosise it. Generalised statements like "Sony wants this... Microsoft wants that..." ignores that these companies are comprised of thousands of individuals, not a single robotic policy maker.

      Though the AIBO guys are probably working on one. :)

    14. Re:Sony is actually two companies? by dackroyd · · Score: 2
      Actually, there is an SCEJ. They're the Product Development side of Sony Computer Entertainment that makes games for PlayStation consoles.

      I thought that all the PlayStation development was included in the SCEI company, which is why they and their second party developers get all the devkits and all the information about the PS first.

      Generalised statements like "Sony wants this... Microsoft wants that..." ignores that these companies are comprised of thousands of individuals

      Hmm, but most of Microsoft strategic decisions are made by just two people, Stevie and Billy.

      ....not a single robotic policy maker.
      Though the AIBO guys are probably working on one.


      Arf! Do you think it will waggle it's legs in the air when you tickle it's belly ?

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
  11. Links by uk_greg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sony press release: http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/2873

    Product page: http://www.storagebysony.com/cd-rw/product.asp?id= 185

    1. Re:Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, how difficult is it to make links clickable by adding some_text tags to them???

      Sony press release

      Product page

  12. why by mydigitalself · · Score: 5, Interesting

    when you have something as sexy as the MZ-N1 would anybody want something this big to lug around.

    actually, a better why...

    why do americans not like/use minidisc players? i noticed that when i was over there about a month ago - everyone had clunkly cd-size walkmen. in london mini-disc players are continuing to become more ubiqitous and i would assume for two reasons:
    1) size
    2) re-recordable

    does this just not go down well in the US?
    i mean, discover the sony mz-n1....

    1. Re:why by marc_gerges · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Minidisk may be fashionable in the UK, but the rest of Europe doesn't buy in either. If my music player of choice doesn't need to play the silver round thing I just bought in the mall, why should I not use an iPod? Or get rid of moving parts at all and have a flash MP* player?

    2. Re:why by (trb001) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They never took off here because Sony never released pre-recorded stuff on them. All you could get for a long time (note: I had a MD player/recorder for 2 years) was blank discs, and to record on them was hell. You had to play music and hit the record button. Mine did a pretty good job of picking up on the space between tracks and splitting them, but it was still problematic.

      The only people that I know who used them were those that had them as part of their entertainment centers. That means you had to have the portable player and the standalone recorder which, in this day and age isn't happening.

      I suppose the greatest dilemna for Sony was that they didn't let anyone else produce material or hardware for the minidisc, it could have taken off had they done that.

      --trb

    3. Re:why by McCart42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the minidisc uses Sony's proprietary ATRAC format, which is a pain, because it takes longer to transfer music to the player. See CNet's review...it's not exactly glowing. It's more expensive than CD players, and more handicapped. If it weren't it'd take the country by storm...it has great battery life and good media.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    4. Re:why by hexdcml · · Score: 4, Insightful
      indeed.. it seems that only now that MD has really taken off.. i used to be an owner of a large and chunky MD player. At that time (it was only 2 years ago) I had all my mates gawking at it, and looking confuddled..

      *Cue Apple switch music*

      I had it... it worked... but it kinda sucked in the fact that to put music on.. you HAD to do it in real-time. I bought a HI-FI deck which allowed x2 speeds, but still it did not really satisfy my needs - who wants to waste 30 minutes waiting for a CD to copy over? Oh yeah, NetMD now apparently is better, but I've never had one, nor will I ever get a MD player again. For me? 20gb iPod all my music, all my documents and 'some' of my movies in my pocket. It brings a smirk to my face everytime I see people fumbling around with CDs/MDs on the train platform.. hehehe. If you're willing to spend *THAT* much on a personal audio device, you might as well buy the best availble... I'm Michael Jin, and I'm a student....

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    5. Re:why by MisterP · · Score: 1

      I finally ditched my Compact Flash MP3 player for a Sony mz-n505 minidisc player. Best thing I ever did. I have yet to try out the NetMD feature on it but, what I like is I can record 2 hour long DJ sets and have the unit automatically stick in 5 minute markers so I can easily skip through the set.

      Also I loathe any kind of DRM, the way I use it, the DRM built into it hasn't stop me from doing anything. I don't even know what kind of DRM features it has.

      The record time doesn't matter to me. I just plug it in and let it go.

      The media is cheap. It's a very mature and solid format.

    6. Re:why by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      heh. i kind of like the cool factor of fumbling around with MDs - kinda makes me believe i'm keanu reeves... *sigh*

    7. Re:why by trcooper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Net-MD is too little too late. It will never compete with MP3 players here in the US, because it is an inferior product. This player offers more features, than any NetMD player as well as a lower price tag. You may trade off in size, but if that's what you're after, a Nomad Zen or iPod offers more features than a NetMD player for a lower price tag.

      Why would anyone pay $350 for a NetMD player that has lower capacity and a proprietary format, not to mention all of the DRM.

    8. Re:why by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Interesting
      why do americans not like/use minidisc players? i noticed that when i was over there about a month ago - everyone had clunkly cd-size walkmen. in london mini-disc players are continuing to become more ubiqitous and i would assume for two reasons:

      Well, I'm a Londoner and I wouldn't say they are becoming more ubiquitois. Yes, there are a larger number of people with them than I've ever seen before, but what is become more seen is those people with the little white clip on their clothes. That is the Nokia 8310.

      Plus those people that do have MD's are often holding several year old models rather than the latest one. Which either means there is a damn good trade in ancient MD's or these are players bought a while ago.

      But anyway I'm digressing, here's why I don't use the NetMD:

      MD's are good quality. If you can overlook the fact that you have to copy all your music to MD at realtime.

      Of course, you could get the NetMD, but then you'd have to jump through hoops (read check in/check out) to get the songs onto the MD, you can't copy them back off, you can't check them out more than 3 times, you have to convert them to Sony's propriatory ATRAC format, LP4 compression is so poor quality-wise you can only use LP2 at the most, you can't delete the songs off the MD without checking them back into the software and you sometimes find that the software refuses to convert an MP3 (often a VBR one).

      Oh, yes, and you get to pay £250 for the privilidge of the above when my player was over half the price.

      NetMD was an attempt by Sony to capitalise on the MP3 boom, unfortunately their content division were so paranoid about piracy that they effectivly cripped what would have been a seriously good product that might have stemmed the death of the MD.

      If, however, MP3 means nothing to you or you have no need for such a thing, then a plain old bog standard MD player is both cheap, light, jog-proof and rather cool. But NetMD is a joke.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    9. Re:why by demon · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I live in the US, and a few years ago, I saw at least one place that had (a few) prerecorded Minidiscs available for sale. I don't recall how they compared to CDs in the pricing department, but I know they did exist. Of course, all you could get on them was music produced by Sony or one of its subsidiaries/business units, but I know it was available.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    10. Re:why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony's software that comes with the NetMD range (at least here in Europe) is crap. You can get round the check in/ checkout crap by using "Simple Burner" and "Nero", I have. Put loads of MP3's onto minidisc, and find that I now have spare capacity on my computers hard drive! ;-) Check out http://www.minidisc.org

    11. Re:why by Zarquon · · Score: 2

      Why? It's crippled, intentionally. Everything gets re-encoded into their proprietary compression (which admittedly, isn't bad, but it's another layer of loss.)

      You can now download to the unit faster with the MD stuff, but unless a new hack has come out, you cannot upload at high quality, even content you have recorded.

      I was considering a cheap one for portable recording, but ended up with a laptop and an Eiderol/Roland UA-5. 24-bit recording, decent mic-pres, and a bunch of analog and digital ports.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    12. Re:why by shepd · · Score: 1

      >why do americans not like/use minidisc players?

      Slow and cumbersome to record on, for a start.
      Full of Sony proprietary crap.
      Made by Sony.
      Includes *very* heavy handed DRM via SCMS.
      Expensive players.
      Non-ubiquitous.
      Expensive media.
      In general, few to no computer MD recorders for the longest time due to Sony stupidity.

      Summing that up, were down to 0 stars out of 5.

      I'd rather use my $50 KOSS MP3 CD player before I'd get any kind of MiniDisc crap.

      A decent MP3 player (not like the above) can play FAR better quality sound than any MD player can, due to the fact that the MP3 format has _always_ supported high-bitrate encoding, unlike MD, which, until lately, was a one bitrate mechanism. And if that MP3 player play 8 cm CDs, guess what, its only slightly larger than an MD player (if designed properly), and it holds more music at a better quality than standard MD players. And if they integrate a CD-RW recorder into it, there's nothing left that MD has over MP3.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:why by will · · Score: 1

      people mostly use MD here (London) if they have some interest in recording as well. You can use it for radio-quality interviews, plug it into the desk and record a gig, leave it on the table in a meeting, feed it into an avid and generally mess about in a very simple and accessible way.

      I know you can record onto the archos jukeboxes and a few others like them, but the quality is pretty dire, and what mp3 player can you throw at the sound guy and tell him to play track 4, or just hit record? if you're actually working with sound, they're about the best thing at the moment. that you can listen to music in between is just a bonus.

    14. Re:why by trcooper · · Score: 2

      For that purpose I can understand choosing MD. But for casual listening, what most people are looking for, the format doesn't offer a lot of advantages, or any that I know of.

    15. Re:why by lpret · · Score: 1
      I had a portable minidisc player/recorder from Sharp and the main reason they didn't take off is the availibility of media. I had two retail MDs, a Rage Against The Machine disc and a Silverchair disc. No matter how hard I tried to find them, they simply did not exist in stores. It seems like a catch-22, no one has MD players, so no MDs are sold -- vice versa, no one has MDs so no players are sold.


      Especially with mp3 players around, I have a Rio 800 w/ 256 mb and a Creative Nomad Jukebox w/ 20 gig -- I have a small one for running around and the big one for at home and on the road. You just can't compare the ease with which I d/l mp3s and throw it (within 20 seconds) onto my mp3 player and head out the door.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    16. Re:why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question arises...WHY do you want to believe that you are keanu reeves?

    17. Re:why by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Maybe those new 8cm MP3 CD players answers this question...

      No proprietary media, small, good batteries and - best of all - a $.50 200MB media. Why caring about MD ??

  13. look at it objectively by hype7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, seriously, is this such a bargain?

    If you want a DVD player, you're much better off going with a dedicated unit for the same $$$. It will give you infinitely better picture quality.

    If you want an MP3/etc player, head for an iPod or that new Creative device. It'll be smaller (and even the cheapest version will still have as much memory as a DVD), and the battery life will be better because it doesn't have to spin the damn dvd around all the time.

    One of those cases of big wow factor because of convergence/size/cuteness, but when you look at it objectively - jack of all trades, master of none.

    -- james

    1. Re:look at it objectively by iceT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It will give you infinitely better picture quality.

      Really? I've seen NO appreciable difference in DVD players.... The TV makes the most difference.

      --
      -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    2. Re:look at it objectively by popu · · Score: 1

      I see your point but Im still definately interested. Honestly the only thing holding me back from buying a DVD burner (other than standards) in that I want to be able to make a DVD full of MP3's that I can play in my car.

      This looks like what Ive been waiting for. All the other features are a plus. And yes I do have that many MP3's... this is sooo much easier than juggling CD's while Im driving.

      Leo

    3. Re:look at it objectively by technix4beos · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt you have to juggle 5 gigs worth of mp3 while driving.

      I suppose you do this while talking on your cellphone...

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    4. Re:look at it objectively by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of whether it's a bargain. Is this being marketed more towards the US or the Japanese? Rich Asian kids (I wish I was one) tend to spend money on toys like this.

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  14. 256MB memory stick? by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is sort of off topic, but the way that Sony is pushing their Memory Stick technology (it's in almost all their products now), you'd think that Sony would be focusing more on getting larger capacity Memory Sticks out the door. Currently they max out at 128MB, while you can get 1GB compactflash cards for pretty cheap. I have a 4MP Sony digicam, and it fills a 128MB stick pretty quickly. I think I remember Sony was planning to release the 256MB Memory Stick at the end of last year, with plans to take it up to 4GB(!). Well, Sony, we're almost at the end of this year, and 256MB sticks are nowhere to be seen. Not to mention a 128MB stick is still way too overpriced, even by Sony's licensee's. You have to wonder if Sony is having problems manufacturing higher density Memory Sticks. However, they are still pushing the technology, so maybe that is a good sign.

    1. Re:256MB memory stick? by jcook793 · · Score: 1

      Here here! I've been waiting for that stupid 256MB memory stick since last year. I love my super-cool Sony F707 still camera (I know, new model just came out, I'm so-last-month) but I get pretty irked looking at those 256MB CF cards sitting right next to a 128MB stick with the same price.

  15. Where does it say it plays WMAs? by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    has released this all in one media device that can play mp3's, wma's, cd's, and DVD's


    Where does it say this plays WMAs? I couldn't find it in the article. What I did see is that it provides enough playback for 1.5 hours of DVD, so less than a lot of movies.


    This should be a nice alternative to car DVD players which are always ridiculously expensive.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Where does it say it plays WMAs? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      has released this all in one media device that can play mp3's, wma's, cd's, and DVD's

      Didn't you sort of answer your own question? :)

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    2. Re:Where does it say it plays WMAs? by The-Bus · · Score: 2

      Actually I was referring to the article. The article doesn't state it plays WMAs at all.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  16. This sounds cool, but... by Canuckanuck · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...it can't be hooked up directly to a TV to view a DVD. Only through a computer linkage can it that be done. This product will be totally cool when I can take it to my luddite grandmother's house where there is no computer and hook it up to her TV while she's baking brownies.

    Only then will it rock!

    1. Re:This sounds cool, but... by guidemaker · · Score: 1

      Good grief. No DVD output? What on earth is the point, then? I guess if you put your whole collection of MP3s onto DVD that would be easier to carry round, but what a missed opportunity.

    2. Re:This sounds cool, but... by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you'll settle for CD, VCD, and mp3-on-CD, try the Napa DAV310. Hideous colour scheme, ropey interface, but, hey it's a portable VCD player.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  17. Memory Stick It Up Their Ass. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 0

    This would be even more wonderful if instead of, or along with their proprietary Memory Stick they had offered another form of memory expansion slot. Why does Sony seem so with it, and yet still hold on to old, starving-on-the-teet technology like a perpetual wetnurse. Did they learn nothing from Betamax?

  18. Perfect for travelers with subnotebooks! by Brento · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've always longed for those super-ultra-tiny notebooks like you find on Dynamism, but the coolest ones don't have built-in CD or DVD drives. I hate carrying around a drive just because I might need to read a cd-rom, but this little gizmo would be the perfect companion. I could use it to watch movies on the road in hotels, plus listen to music, and still play cd-roms with the computer.

    The drawback of the bundled add-on CD drives that come with the notebooks is that they don't function separately - you're just lugging around a mostly useless cd-rom reader, not a CD/DVD Walkman. This thing is going to sell like hotcakes to business travelers!

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Perfect for travelers with subnotebooks! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      I've always longed for those super-ultra-tiny notebooks like you find on Dynamism [dynamism.com], but the coolest ones don't have built-in CD or DVD drives.

      You might want to look at the Fujitsu P-Series. The specs are pretty nice, it's quite small, it has a CD-RW/DVD drive built in (which can be swapped out for another battery), it's available in the States and it's much less expensive than a Dynamism import.

  19. Really cool, but, what about regions? by pigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it be hacked to be regionfree? And macrovisionfree?

  20. Not the ultimate player. by sanermind · · Score: 2

    It won't be the ultimate player until it can also play mpeg4 video. It's only a matter of time before these become common. So many people achieved substantial mp3 music holdings, that the portable cd audio players [as well as car players, home players] began to cater to consumer demand, and offer the additional function of playing .mp3's stored in a iso9660 data track.

    Soon enough, the newer dvd players will be able to play "divx" .avi's as a matter of course.

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    1. Re:Not the ultimate player. by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any that are coming? I've been looking for one, but the keywords are a bit ambiguious due to Circuit City's fiasco.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:Not the ultimate player. by xigxag · · Score: 2

      [Re portable Mpeg4 players] Do you know of any that are coming?

      Yes.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    3. Re:Not the ultimate player. by Choron · · Score: 1

      Cool device, it's been released nearly 1 year ago but I doesn't seem to be a great success so far which may remind us of the Eggy player. (page in Japanese).
      People might prefer using a slightly more expensive PDA but with which they could do more than play MP3s or watch a movie. The MT-AV1 is using the same video codec ("Nancy") as the one in the Sharp MI-E21 by the way. Still a cool gadget though.

      --
      "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
  21. I am asking myself... by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am asking myself, why do people really need a portable DVD player? Are not cdr/mp3/audio-cd disk players enough? Sounds to me just another product to make consumers pay up.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    1. Re:I am asking myself... by two_ply · · Score: 1
      "...just another product to make consumers pay up."

      As opposed to all the consumer goods made to make Sony pay up?

    2. Re:I am asking myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. My mp3 CD player does VCD composite out and it's pretty sweet to not have to lug a PC or DVD player around to be able to watch a movie. It also makes going on holiday with lots of music easy, and there's little to nothing that can get stolen/lost seeing as the mp3's are on CD-R and the the MP3/VCD player is cheap to replace. Being able to play DVD's is an added perk, and if it plays MP3's off DVD-R's then I'll certainly consider buying one just for that. At an average 5Mb per track that's about 900 tracks per disc.

  22. Uh oh..... by Asprin · · Score: 2


    Uh oh.....

    Sony isn'y going to like this!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  23. Obligatory vorbis complaint by Redline · · Score: 2

    I'm not buying another portable until I can get vorbis support. Someone please legitimize the format!
    This thing plays everything (CDs as well as MP3, WAV and WMA files that are stored on CDs, DVDs or the company's own Memory Stick cards) but vorbis! Is there really more people with WAVs stored on Memory Sticks than folks who want vorbis playback?

  24. But... by e8johan · · Score: 2

    if I burn my MP3s on a writable DVD, the battery time is to short for me to listen through it all...

    Once again we return the problem issue of battery time. This seems to be the limiting factor in portable electronics today, either you can't use it long enough, or it is to heavy to be carried.

    1. Re:But... by LeapingGnomeArs · · Score: 1

      Except for the IPod with it's 10+ hours of battery life. Listen to it all day at work and then on the ride home.

    2. Re:But... by technix4beos · · Score: 1

      You don't get it.

      Storing a DVD full of mp3 will give you WAY more than 10 hours of music.

      Try listening to that much at one time before? I didn't think so.

      I doubt anyone has.

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
  25. Missing Killer Feature by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    .
    This thing is missing the one feature that would have made it unique as a portable device.
    VCD Recording.
    I understand the practical limitations that would prevent it, but if after all I'm going to hook it up to a TV, why not record?
    It would have made a great adjunct to the current crop of digital CamCorders.

    It's pretty (I guess depending on your estetic), but the extra utility would have put it over the top even if the list went to $500.

    Of course it would have to be more reliable than my Terrapin.

  26. Platforms... by facelessnumber · · Score: 5, Funny

    supports both Macintosh and Windows platforms

    They say this like there are only two.


    "We got both kinds of music here - Country and Western."

    1. Re:Platforms... by technix4beos · · Score: 1

      To most people in consumer land, there really are only two choices.

      Or to be put more correctly, the system that comes with the machine they purchased, and the alternatives they only find out about when junior comes over to install linux, or what they see at the local city papers' office when they pay for the subscription. (read: mac)

      So, the question you have to ask yourself is this: "What am I doing to create more awareness of choices in the consumer market?"

      I know what I am doing, and plan on doing in the future. Do you?

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    2. Re:Platforms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Oh yeah - Unix. Like a majority of the buying public can or would be interested in compiling their own kernels. Gimme a break.
      Eh? Using Unix does not obligate you to compile a kernel.
    3. Re:Platforms... by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1



      They say this like there are only two

      Ah, that would explain this "linux" thing I keep seeing mentioned on this site. Always wondered about that...

  27. Yes! by Konster · · Score: 2

    "That push has intensified with the popularity of digital entertainment formats such as MP3 music files and file-sharing sites such as Napster."

    Napster has been dead for what, well over a year and a half?

    Do I really need a device that is borne from the efforts of a company that lives, breathes and lives the DMCA? And is the main member of the RIAA?

    Fuck MP3.

    Go Ogg.

    1. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, most consumers have never heard of ogg, and until the technology is pushed into the open, it won't be incorporated into consumer technologies.
      Also, as long as portable players play mp3s, most people will keep their music library in mp3, not ogg.

      signed, the anonymous coward... *_*

  28. Another /. RTFA! by 3583+Bytes+Free · · Score: 4, Informative
    Read the f*cking article!

    Sony product page
    Sony's cool new Digital Relay(TM) portable battery operated CD-RW/DVD-ROM/Memory Stick® drive burns CDs when attached to a PC or Macintosh® computer using the USB 2.0/1.1 port. Detach the drive from the computer, and you now have a portable CD player that also plays MP3 and WAV files on CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, or Memory Stick media.

    It plays DVD-ROMs, not DVD-Video discs. This basically is a MP3 player that can use DVDs. So you can get 4.7GB on a MP3 disc instead of 650-700 MB. I still think it's worth a link on /., but for pete's sake, RTFA before you submit, and editors, RTFA before you post!

    1. Re:Another /. RTFA! by uradu · · Score: 2

      > It plays DVD-ROMs, not DVD-Video discs

      Good point, and for just that functionality it's way overpriced. The NetworkWorldFusion article then also probably has the power usage figures wrong, because it makes no sense why it would only run for 1.5h reading DVDs vs. 10h reading regular CDs if it's not actually doing video decoding on the DVD.

    2. Re:Another /. RTFA! by AzrealAO · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the power usage figures are right. The post you're replying to has it wrong. The first article says it functions as a DVD Video Player when connected to a TV or PC, and the Sony Product Page links to that review.

  29. removable media by DieNadel · · Score: 1

    Last July I was choosing between portable mp3 players, and saw the Sony CD-R/RW player/recorder. I must say that it looked damn ugly and too clumsy to carry around.
    This new one surely beats it on looks and size, and it can play from DVDs (I think...). Back at that time, I chose the Archos Jukebox Recorder 20Gb, so it wouldn't be necessary to carry medias along (like 35 mp3 CDs), but looking at the possibility of playing DVD (that is, more than 20Gb in ONE SINGLE MEDIA), I guess this new player from Sony has a huge appeal to me.

    --
    Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
    1. Re:removable media by DieNadel · · Score: 1

      Uh-oh! Dumb me! I don't know why I was thinking 60Gb, instead of 4.7Gb on one DVD. OK, back to Archos again!
      Damn early hours...

      --
      Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
    2. Re:removable media by uradu · · Score: 2

      > and it can play from DVDs [...] more than 20Gb in ONE SINGLE MEDIA

      Yeah, but that would be only pre-recorded data DVDs. If you burn your own DVD-Rs, you're back to 4.7GB worth of MP3 tracks.

  30. yeah, but memorystick? by doodleboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sony owns the memory stick format. They're expensive and no one else uses them. Hell would freeze over before it happened, but I'd prefer something like a 128mb usb diskonkey dongle. You can use them on pretty well any computer without a separate reader. However, if my motherboard didn't have it built-in I'd want to get a usb 2.0 card before trying to burn CDs or transferring large files.

    But save for those couple of issues, this seems like an incredibly versatile unit for 300 clams. I expect we'll see a lot more machines like this, and probably for a lot less cash once Samsung, et al, get in on it. And they'll probably come to market with a more useful replacement for memorystick, too.

    Oh yeah: Does anyone know what, if anything, this unit has in the way of DRM support? One would not like to buy a device that was deliberately crippled in any way.

    1. Re:yeah, but memorystick? by uradu · · Score: 3

      > And they'll probably come to market with a more
      > useful replacement for memorystick, too.

      Such as no memory card slot at all, because what's the bloody point? Sony is just putting MS slots into everything it makes nowadays in order to force the standard down people's throats, whether it makes sense to or not. This is a CD and DVD player, not a memory card player. If I want a memory card player, I'll buy one of those. Why increase the cost of a rotating media player by also making it play other types of media?

    2. Re:yeah, but memorystick? by execom · · Score: 1

      of course, I'm sure that only Magic Gate Memory stick (SDMI compliant) will be supported - which are 3 times more expensive than the blue memory sticks.

      --
      I need a Sino-Logic 16. Sogo-7 data-gloves, a GPL stealth module...
    3. Re:yeah, but memorystick? by doodleboy · · Score: 1
      Why increase the cost of a rotating media player by also making it play other types of media?
      Versatility is why. It already has a usb connector, and it would be cheaper and more useful to include a diskonkey. You wouldn't have to install any special software on your computer or try to burn a cd or anything like that, just copy a bunch of mp3s to the diskonkey drive.

      I dunno, I think it would be useful. Especially if you were on someone else's computer or only had the key with you. Etc.
    4. Re:yeah, but memorystick? by uradu · · Score: 2

      > It already has a usb connector, and it would be
      > cheaper and more useful to include a diskonkey

      No it wouldn't. The player is just a USB device and has (almost 100% likely) no host controller, and USB memory devices require a host controller (plus lots of software drivers) to be read. The USB bus is a master-slave setup, and plugging a DiskOnKey into the Sony player would result in two slave devices being connected together without a master controller, which is completely useless.

  31. This will be useful to me... by jaredcoleman · · Score: 1

    I work on a lot of older machines that don't have burners or high bandwidth connections, so having the ability to transfer large amounts of data with a portable device would be very useful. I never wanted to spend the money on one before, because I would only be able to use it for this reason. Now, I can buy one and it will also serve as a diskman, mp3 and dvd player.

  32. Playstation Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you hook up a portable PS screen to it. THose are only like $100 and have built in speakers.?

  33. Archos - 20Gb and a screen for $449 by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    US
    UK

    MP4 Video Player (DivX compatible*) JPEG/BMP Viewer MP3 Player & Recorder

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  34. That's the battery life, dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to do with it's technical abilities.

  35. Size Issues by Komrade+S. · · Score: 2

    The grand thing about DVDs and CDs is that they are the same size and work of reasonably similar technologies, at least similar enough to integrate into a single device. The problem with MD is that it's size is unconventional (what with the "boxy thing" that they are in like the earlier Mac CDROMs), this is why I personally I wouldn't go for MD again (I had one, it got stolen).

    Next time I think I'm going to go for a player that can play VBR (Variable Bit Rate) (Specifically -APS) MP3s from half-size CDRs. My personal favourite is <plug> this one </plug>.

    --

    s200.org - visit it (me), love it (me).

  36. Made by Sony? by Corfe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Don't buy Sony CD-Drives.

    in case the link is dead, apparently trying to access (copy-protected) CD's the wrong way with a Sony CD drive will cause a kernel oops. Possibly/Probably a flaw on purpose built-in by Sony.

  37. What is with the .com.com domains? by wowbagger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What is it with the .com.com domains (check the link in the story)? zdnet.com.com? news.com.com?

    Is this just some office-of-redunant-redundancy-office stuff, or is there something more going on here?

    com.com seems to be owned by CNET - does CNET really beleive users are so stupid that they append .com to any .com domain?

    Or did CNET just get tired of paying for all those second level domains, and move everything to .com.com to save money?

    And what is with this CRAP of forcing the width of the page? Does no-one at CNET run more than 800x600? If my browser window is 1400 pixels wide, it is that wide FOR A REASON - USE IT!

    I've heard from one webmasterbater that "Users don't want to read really long lines of text" - then tell them to RESIZE THEIR BROWSER WINDOW!

    Last but not least - the device listed in the review DOES NOT HAVE A SCREEN TO VIEW DVDS! Many of the comments on this story are of the form "Cool! Now I can use this to watch my (porn|movies) and play my music". RTFA - to watch DVDs you need an external monitor. While this would be great for use in motel rooms, presentations, or other environments where a TV is at hand, it would be useless for watching movies on a (train|plane|bus|boat) since you have no way to display the video (last I'd seen, while some planes may have a screen on the seat in front of you, there is no provision for you to feed arbitrary video into it.)

  38. Maybe you should RTFA, dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the first article:

    "When connected to a Windows or Macintosh computer, the device can serve as a CD-RW drive for recording digital content or backing up computer data. When connected to a television or PC, the device can also become a DVD player for watching movies. "

    1. Re:Maybe you should RTFA, dumbass. by 3583+Bytes+Free · · Score: 1

      After exploring all the information on the Sony site, there is no indication that you can play DVDs directly to a TV. It appears to essentially be a portable drive that can play MP3s on it's own.

  39. Made by Sony? by Corfe · · Score: 1

    Don't buy Sony CD-Drives.

    in case the link is dead, apparently trying to access (copy-protected) CD's the wrong way with a Sony CD drive will cause a kernel oops. Possibly/Probably a flaw on purpose built-in by Sony.

    (grrr sorry about double post, that'll teach me to hit "submit" instead of "preview")

  40. Reasons why MD is better than MP3 by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason why MiniDisc is better than the iPod or other portable MP3 units is very simple. How much is a Flash memory card? A 128 meg card (or stick) will run you about $60 if you're very good at looking. Now, how much is a blank minidisc? Less than $2.00. If you don't ever plan on lending out your music, an MP3 player is fine and dandy.

    Oh, but I almost forgot: an MP3 player is just that... a player . Not a recorder. So what happens when you want a digital copy of a concert? Or want to record a lecture? Or want to copy a friend's new CD? You're shit out of luck. With an MP3 player, you're constantly tethered to a computer if you want to expand your music collection. Minidisc doesn't have this problem.

    People who think Minidiscs are poor substitutes for CD's miss the point entirely -- they are excellent substitutes for TAPES. Keep your CD player. But for portable tunes, with an option for recording, I always carry MiniDisc.

    1. Re:Reasons why MD is better than MP3 by miltimj · · Score: 1

      You can get 128MB CompactFlash cards for $45 or less, no problem, and they're always going down in price.

      Also, unlike mini-disc, they can serve many more purposes (quick transport between computers, digital cameras, etc)

      There's no way I'd buy the hardware required to support mini-disc when they have such a one-track function.

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    2. Re:Reasons why MD is better than MP3 by Alranor · · Score: 2
      Oh, but I almost forgot: an MP3 player is just that... a player . Not a recorder. So what happens when you want a digital copy of a concert? Or want to record a lecture? Or want to copy a friend's new CD? You're shit out of luck. With an MP3 player, you're constantly tethered to a computer if you want to expand your music collection.
      Nice try.
      Wrong tho.

      Nomad Jukebox
      Analog/Optical Line-In for direct high quality recording from external audio devices


      There are MP3 players which record, and I believe the Nomad even encodes to mp3 on the fly, so you're not constantly tethered to your computer in any way.
  41. So what? This one is around �145 ($190) by shibbie · · Score: 1

    Here -about half way down the page, their "Vision" player.

    1. Re:So what? This one is around �145 ($190) by gantz · · Score: 1
      --
      Gur svggrfg funyy fheivir lrg gur hasvg znl yvir. Jr zhfg ercrng.
  42. Maybe you should have read the article. by AzrealAO · · Score: 1, Redundant

    From the first article in the story: "As a standalone portable player, Sony's new gadget can play back CDs as well as MP3, WAV and WMA files that are stored on CDs, DVDs or the company's own Memory Stick cards. When connected to a Windows or Macintosh computer, the device can serve as a CD-RW drive for recording digital content or backing up computer data. When connected to a television or PC, the device can also become a DVD player for watching movies." Check out that last sentence there.

  43. Expensive??? I don't think so. by forged · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's cute. And expensive.

    For a portable device which records and reads CDs at 24X, rewrites CDs at 10X and reads DVDs at 8X, for less than $300 I think it isn't too bad actually. IMHO of course.

  44. ogg files? by Omnifarious · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will it play ogg files? My absolute requirement for anything I get like this is that it be able to play oggs.

    Also, does it use the USB storage interface, or some other standard USB interface so I don't need funky drivers to use it under Linux?

    1. Re:ogg files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live and work on a platform put together by hackers and genius coders, then you know that it won't support Ogg unless someone modifies it to do so...

    2. Re:ogg files? by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No company is going to feel compelled to offer OGG support until the competition offers OGG support. Kind of a catch-22. Not that some off brand could not make a name for themseleves (or at least push a few units to the /. crowd) by decoding OGG....But I guarentee you that no major brand is going to take the plunge (and spend the extra engineering and production fees) until they are forced to by the competition.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    3. Re:ogg files? by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

      Ogg is a patent free media format that's much higher quality than the MP3 format.

      If you never want anything to improve or change, then perhaps you ought to not use a computer at all. I hear quill pens have worked in basically the same way with the same inks and paper for 100s of years. Perhaps they would be more your speed, since you seem so averse to the new and different.

  45. Preemptive ADA strike??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ADA requirements have forced Sony to release a DVD player that will allow sighted and blind people to have the same movie "watching" experience.

    Or something like that :-)

  46. i would buy it but... NO analog out to TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it doesnt have any VGA/RCA out ports to plug into my TV. I'm gonna get an mp3 cd player boombox this xmas. this would have been my product of choice (i dont have a dvd player yet either) had it had more out ports besides USB2.0.

  47. No Linux support by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the Article:

    The MPD-AP20U includes a Memory Stick media slot, a USB 2.0 port and supports both Macintosh and Windows platforms.

    This alone is a showstopper for me. Of course people will hack around and maybe get it to work. The price doesn't seem too high if it is under US$ 300 as the article mentions though.

    1. Re:No Linux support by ianezz · · Score: 2

      Well, the fact it supports Windows and MacOS doesn't necessarily mean it won't work on Linux.

      Being a CD-RW, it probably just talks SCSI over USB when writing, and probably shows up itself as a SCSI-over-USB cd reader (or as a Mass Storage unit) when reading. IIRC, there is good support for both on Linux (unless the firmware is broken). OTOH, IEEE1394 would have been a better choice than USB2.0, IMHO (at least, IEEE1394 has been out for more time).

  48. ..But how about the BenQ? by gantz · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://mp3playerstore.com/stuff_you_need/dvd/benq. htm

    $159 isn't too bad. There's also:

    http://mp3playerstore.com/buy_it_now__/mp-2001.htm

    for $64.95. Probably horrible shit construction, but not bad for the price.

    --
    Gur svggrfg funyy fheivir lrg gur hasvg znl yvir. Jr zhfg ercrng.
  49. Thank you, Sony! by Flakeloaf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now when I'm stranded on a lonely bus or subway in desperate need of a coaster, I need only to fire up my portable CDRW with the half-dead batteries and voila! A handy place to set my coffee cup down in under eight minutes. Thank you Sony Man!

    --

    Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

  50. Hey! for that money... by flyneye · · Score: 2, Funny

    With the low prices on writers and dvd drives this thing had better play vinyl,8 track and cassette for $300 as well as crack a beer for me too.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  51. Yes, there IS an indicator.. by thrice+rocks! · · Score: 1

    From the Sony info page:

    "High performance software bundle included
    The MPD-AP20U comes with everything needed to start recording your own CDs, including a suite of high performance software for Windows® systems:...Cyberlink PowerDVD(TM) DVD-Video decoder software"

    Now, they might just be including the software for the hell of it, but including that software makes me think it also plays DVD videos..

    1. Re:Yes, there IS an indicator.. by demon · · Score: 1

      If it requires PowerDVD to play DVD Video discs, then that means you have to plug it into a computer to play DVD Video discs. Does it have any TV outs of its own? If not, then it doesn't play DVD Video discs on its own.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    2. Re:Yes, there IS an indicator.. by 3583+Bytes+Free · · Score: 1

      PowerDVD loads onto the PC. At that point, you just use the unit as a reguar DVD-ROM drive attached to the PC. That's a far cry from a standalone DVD.

  52. OK... some things don't look right here... by ClumzyKid · · Score: 5, Informative

    After reading some comments here about the fact that it doesn't support display nor Linux... I did a lil' research...

    The ZDNet article states "...When connected to a television or PC, the device can also become a DVD player for watching movies. "... Now that is not entirely false... As you'll see in a copy of the press release (scroll down the page to find it) here... You'll see that you can play DVD movies via the PC's USB.. "Hi-Speed USB Interface (USB 2.0/1.1)"! at 8x speed... only... as for the TV it's not supported; as stated "Output: Mini analog stereo (headphone jack) only"... So that is one fact down... Prolly in the future they may provide the means to do it via USB>DECODER>TV... :)

    Now for the other problem... support for Linux... the press release states "System requirements: Pentium® II 233Mhz or faster PC with 32Mb RAM, HDD with 1.2Mb sustained transfer rate or faster, Direct-X supported sound card, Installed USB 1.1 or 2.0 port, Power Macintosh G3, Power Mac G4, iMac DV or iBook® computer running Mac OS 9.2.2 or higher OR Windows 98/2000/Me/XP operating system..." So the answer for the time being is no... no Linux support... but it's less than a month away... and who knows... if everyone rants on their head they may support it ;)... However, I think the Linux community will find way ....

    --
    Great ideas happen at 4am. Bad career moves happen at 4pm...
    1. Re:OK... some things don't look right here... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      no Linux support... but it's less than a month away... and who knows... if everyone rants on their head they may support it ;)... However, I think the Linux community will find way ....

      IF, and this is a big if, the device is a 'USB mass Storage Device', then Linux will allready have support!

      Don't count on it though.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  53. MD == Slow by nuxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's one big reason why I don't use minidisc myself. Single speed recording. I love the fact that I can make a mix CD in less time than it takes to listen to the finished product. I rip a bunch of tracks, normalize them, then burn them down to another disc, all in about half an hour. This is much different from the MD-style of 'hit play, hit record, wait'. If I could get a PC-based MD drive that allowed me to record at something faster than 1x and gave me more control over the mastering process, I'd buy one right away. I don't like MP3 players because I use Ogg and the media is expensive. But I would happily buy cheap, removable MD media. It's just that damn speed issue.

    Well, I'd also like a digital out, but that's not an issue that would keep me from buying a player. I'm sure the DACs in the MD players are plenty good, and then hardware to do ATRAC->PCM and then use your receiver to do PCM->Analog.

    1. Re:MD == Slow by Darlock · · Score: 1

      You can. The technology you are looking for is called Net-MD. I just bought a minidisc player a couple of months ago and this is how I download the songs to my player..ie through my USB port -> player.

      The Sony OpenMG software is a bit of a pain in the ass and only runs on Windows but it's worth it if you ask me. One thing to note: OpenMG used to crash for me all the time until I install SP3 on W2K. I think the crash had to do with some stupid active-X control. Grrr.

    2. Re:MD == Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish they'd rip up the minidisc data format, and build an MP3 player that uses the minidisc form factor. No more MP3>Analogue>Minidisc roundtrip when I'm recording from computer, and no more 1x record.

      The current generation of MP3 players I've tried have had low build quality, or niggling usability issues. Minidiscs also have these issues, but not quite as many. And the disc itself is a triumph - small, chunky, industrial, sexy.

    3. Re:MD == Slow by Darlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read my post above. There is no 1x recording anymore... it's USB... so what do they say the speed of USB is 24x... I don't know. It's blazing fast copying the files over to the mini-disc. The slow part is converting my mp3's to ATRAC format.

      Also, to note: I believe that the ATRAC format is better than mp3. The files are smaller and of the same quality.

      But I agree with you. If I could copy mp3 -> minidisc, I would be in heaven.

  54. hmm ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    why do americans not like/use minidisc players?

    Hmm ... could it be because they suck?

    Nah, it must be because we are quaint and technologically backward. It's true; I read it on /.!

  55. Umm.. old news? by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

    Panasonic has had something like this (minus the -writer part) for over a year now. It is sweet.

    Additionally, you can get porable DVD/MP3/Photo CD/Yadda Yadda players on ebay for about $70. Multiregion, too. Yes, they're not as slick as the sony, but they (and the panasonic) do include a r e m o t e c o n t r o l.

  56. Reason why MP3 is better than MD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's this little thing called 'moving parts', that lots of the mp3 enthusiasts don't likey. They don't likey, cause these 'moving parts' can make songs skip. Flash cards don't have any 'moving parts', so no skippy.

  57. The plural of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plural of mp3 is mp3s. The plural of wma is wmas. The plural of cd is cds. The plural of DVD is DVDs. Learn English.

  58. Even the specs don't agree... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    The Media supported lists VCD (MPEG-1) as a supported format, and then goes on to say that it lacks the ADPCM or Video Decoding Circuitry to playback CD-I disks.

  59. Something better (IMO) by lfarenw · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I saw this bad boy at Target a little while ago:

    http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/ref=br_1_2/60 2-7461077-2529429?asin=B0000632FZ

    And I gotta tell ya, I take this $99 beauty of that $300 Sony anyday. It plays CDs/CDRWs/MP3s AND DVD Video which you can hook up to a TV! No, you can't hook it up directly to a computer but who cares?

  60. Playing Video: Re:Another /. RTFA! by YouTalkinToMe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    According to the article:

    "When connected to a computer, the MPD-AP20U acts as a DVD-ROM drive for viewing DVD movies."

    Sounds like it plays video DVD's to me...

  61. This one might fit in your shoulder bag by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

    Fujitsu P-Series, smallest notebook with an optical drive (CD-RW/DVD). 10.6"x7"x1.59". Marvelous little machine.

  62. Expensive??? by LazyBoy · · Score: 1

    My first portable CD player cost $300.

    --

    If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  63. CD/VCD players by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

    Although the concept of a headless CD/DVD player is new, Asia already has CD/VCD players of similar design. I recently visited China and you could buy for around $50 a portable player that does both CD and VCD, with an video/audio out cable. The other cool feature is that it could generate both NTSC and PAL signals, and you can also use regular rechargable batteries that the unit can recharge. Sure it was a player that was made by a company that is not known here in N. America, but you would have to pay at least $200 to but anything which can do this, and then you you would probably get the PAL signal feature disabled and having to use properity rechargable batteries.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:CD/VCD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got one of those. Actually had it for almost two years now. It's so sweet. Not only does it play MP3 in the car and VCD at home with sound better than my PC sound card when I use the line out jack, but it even recharges my NiMH batteries while it's plugged into the car lighter adaper. I use it to recharge my Chinese Norelco shaver that cost me ten bucks and uses regular NiMH batteries as well. Very sweet little item for the price and it would certainly make a toy like this one a questionable purchase. Unless of course it does play the MP3s off the DVD. I'd be willing to admit that would be a cool feature.

  64. A _Portable_ DVD player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with _region_ code -- uhm, well, was me or them who missed a point?

  65. What's the market (Ogg?) by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
    The real question is which formats make a difference to the people who might actually buy one of these things. MP3 is no doubt a must. WMA? I have no idea, and I don't care, but Ogg would definitely be a selling point for me. So if you do a market study of likely buyers of this product category, is Ogg going to make the list or not? If you survey /., I'm sure it would make the list. I suspect the market for this is slanted toward /. types generally, but how much.

    I gather it doesn't have the outputs to play directly to a TV, that's a bummer too. In my quick read I thought they implied it could be used with a TV, but it wasn't that clear. Is it just a matter of the outputs, or does DVD playing require some processing in the PC that would normally be handled in a dedicated DVD player.

  66. mp3's play longer than CD-audio? by phorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it offers up to four hours of CD audio playback, up to 10 hours of MP3 CD playback and up to 1.5 hours of DVD-ROM playback

    Interesting that it gets more power playing an Mp3 CD than a regular CD. I would have assumed that it would take more juice to decode for mp3's.Perhaps mp3's cache to reduce disc spinning laser usage?

    Also, it would be nice to get a stat on the load-time for mp3's. I've noticed that some Sony mp3-disc players in cars (such as mine) seem to prefer caching the filenames on spinup, which can take annoyingly long.

    1. Re:mp3's play longer than CD-audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playing mp3's on CD saves a lot of battery power. It can spin up the disc, read the files into a memory buffer and then decoded from that without haveing to spin up the disc for a while.
      Of course the saving is based on you conpression ratio but I've noticed my rio only spins up once every minute with --r3mix quality mp3's

    2. Re:mp3's play longer than CD-audio? by Kitsune · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably. They always say on PDAs that using the backlight is the worst way to conserve power. As well, I'm sure running a motor has got to more effort than running a decoder.

      I've got a Rio Volt and it uses the audio buffer as cache for the loaded mp3. (they say... 40secs of cd audio or upto 1200 sec of mp3 audio in the equiv space) It's cute, usually halfway through the song, the cd stops spinning and I can shake the unit till I'm blue in the face or the next song ends. It's got about the same sort of performance on 2AAs.

    3. Re:mp3's play longer than CD-audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it offers up to four hours of CD audio playback,


      Four hours of CD-audio playback?? Dude, my 4-year-old cd walkman has like 32 hours continuous playback, why so short for this thing?

  67. Re:Playing Video: Re:Another /. RTFA! by jez_f · · Score: 1
    Sounds like it plays video DVD's to me...

    It can act as a DVD rom so if you have it connected to your PC and you can play DVDs on it. This does not make it a video DVD player. It dosn't help that the zdnet artical is confusing/wrong.

    What it definatly dosn't do that the ./ arictical said it could do is
    ..then hooked up to your TV, and play your favorite DVD's
    prehaps someone should update the artical.


    BTW and OT the first comment on the Sony page when I viewd it was
    "You ogg users really crack me up. You intentionally rip all of your CDs into an incompatible format, then bitch that it's incompatible!!!"
    Y'know they may have a point :)
  68. Yawn by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    It can be used as a CD-RW drive and play DVDs, but can't record DVDs?

    And you can watch a whole 1.5 hours of a DVD movie on it too.

    Wow.

    Where do I sign?

  69. just 1.5 hours of DVD-ROM playback?! by splorf · · Score: 2

    What's with that? It makes it sort of useless as a portable player of the batteries go flat after just 1.5 hours. Since when does DVD (without mpeg-2 video decoding) need so much more battery power?

  70. Just Another... by gessleX · · Score: 1

    Just another product from a corporation that sues
    for using their product.

    Come on, this is Sony. Yes it is a leader in optical media technology, but it is also a leader in suits for that technology.

    Must we insist on buying meat from a butcher with the history of e-coli?

    Oh yeah, great device. Great price. Good funding for lawsuits concerning DVDs, MP3s, etc.

    It's like having stove and being told not to cook.

    Let's say no this time, shall we? Take our business elsewhere?

  71. But can it play my mp3's recorded on my DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Every CD drive manufactured or distributed by Sony now has drm controls built in. Some have the drm built in and activated now, some have it built into their firmware/hardware and will be turned on through software/OS at a later date (already a news article exposing this about a month ago, don't remember where), but they all have it.

    If all Sony CD decks have drm, why wouldn't the DVD decks have them?

    Have you seen Sony's actions on drm legislation, broadcast flags, and the "analog hole" in Congress? Their actions in the marketplace, trying every possible technology to incorporate drm, and once again trying to install the toll booth that they tried but failed to install on the VCR?

    But Sony makes great audio and video technology

    Remember the story of Uncle Tom? Don't know it? Look it up.

  72. Clarification by Jahf · · Score: 2

    It's a very cool device ... cool enough I went and read the article *gasp* and did a Google search on it for more details.

    Point #1) It only plays DVDs when connected to a computer ... it doesn't have video out itself. For all the people who want to use this combined with a thin monitor or glasses (I was hoping for this myself), forget it. You still need a laptop to decode and display video, and most laptops have a DVD option.

    Point #2) Yes, it will allow you to play MP3s from a DVD ... now -that- is nice ... 4.7GB of music.

    Point #3) It will let you burn MP3s (and I assume anything else) from the memory stick to a CD. That's pretty darned handy, too ... especially if you have friends with Sony memory stick devices.

    I didn't find anything about Ogg support.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  73. USB!? Bleh. by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised Sony didn't use put Firewire (or iLink, as they like to call it) on this thing. It always seemed like most of their products supported it (laptops, PCs, camcorders, even the friggen PS2). But lately I haven't seen it as much. Sure, USB2 is fast, I guess. But I already have a fast Firewire port on my Sony laptop! grr.

    Does USB2 already have a greater market penetration then Firewire?

    Personally, I just think it would be cool if everyone switched to Ethernet. It would be kind of cool to be able to plug all your devices into a hub and have them all communicate with each other that way.

  74. 3 things to look for in a portable music player... by archetypeone · · Score: 1

    These are no brainers and the reason I'm still using MD

    1. Physical Size.
    2. Media Size.
    3. Battery Life.

    I'm still disappointed by the battery life of these MP3 Players, sure you can carry a truckload of music around, but that's no good if you have to juice it up every couple of hours. My MD lasts for 40 hrs playback and with a handful of discs is great.

    The only MP3 device that impresses me is the iPod - nice interface, flexible, big storage and as good a battery life as the rest of them.

  75. Re:Expensive???? ($80 at target) by aim4min · · Score: 1

    When I was in Atlanta over the summer I went to the walkman/discman aisle at Target. I saw a cute decorative portable cd player/video cd/DVD player for $80. It doesn't have a video screen of course, but it had a headphone jack and a video output cable. It was also available in many different styles and colors. It seemed targeted to teenagers. I don't remember the brand name -- and doing a search on google didn't bring up any results. Check out the nearest Target to you and see if they have them!

  76. Yeah, but... by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    This one is the size of a regular disk man. You're right if you're saying this isn't particularly innovative just somewhat convenient.

  77. Sony Life Insurance Co,. Ltd!? by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    Sony life insurance, hrm. Is that like Intel Hotels of Distinction?

  78. Forbes thought it was a DVD-R by Uhh_Duh · · Score: 2, Informative


    Forbes thought it was a DVD-R

    Funny.

    --
    -- People who hate Windows use Linux. People who love UNIX use BSD.
  79. Not exactly right by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    Microsoft isn't exactly a new player entering the video game space with VC funding. They've got quite a bit of outside revenue coming in. And unlike Sony, they don't have to spend almost anything on manufacturing. All they have to do is print more cds, or even just more licensing cards for business.

    They don't call it the "Microsoft tax" for nothing :P

  80. What about DVDs with mp3s by anewsome · · Score: 2

    Very odd that most DVD players will play CDs with mp3s burnt onto them, but won't play a DVD burnt with the same mp3s. Anyone else ever think this is very strange? I wonder if this player will play mp3s burnt onto a DVD-R. That would be nice.

  81. How am I going to watch LOTR? by jackbang · · Score: 1

    With a DVD player that doesn't have a screen and battery life of 1.5 hours?

  82. Hell! by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    ...and to record on them was hell. You had to play music and hit the record button.

    Yeah, sounds like a nightmare!

  83. Re:Expensive???? ($80 at target).....bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you were hallucinating. There are no portable DVD players for $80. What you saw was an ordinary portable CD player.

  84. Hardware support is key factor - get the word out! by aksansai · · Score: 1

    The thing that makes MP3 support so simple is the fact there are manufacturers will have chips that can decode MP3 streams for very little cost. These chips (available from Philips, Texas Instruments, and other big-name chip manufacturers) also feature an on-chip USB controller. Functionally rich - low profile - low power usage - low implementation costs. The current array of MP3 players probably share more guts than one would think.

    The system-on-a-chip design eliminates the need to bundle a more expensive embedded CPU and support a software decoder via firmware. While this is indeed a better option in the long run (due to flexibility and upgrades), it could mean the difference of $1.50 per chip versus $12.00 per CPU/flash combination. Sell 10,000 units and you can see where the savings appears. Of course, take into consideration the elimination of having to implement decoding a stream using multiple chips and interfaces, the savings are exponential. Companies are about the bottom dollar - minimum cost, maximum profit.

    The fact that MP3 has been so popular over the years (the first foot in the door, so to speak), it only makes sense to cater to the 95+% of those people out there that still have collections made of solely MP3s. A smart company would take into consideration emerging technologies, but nonetheless still focus on the popular demand - the one to make the most profit.

    If you visit Xiph's OGG Vorbis hardware support page you can help get the word out that you want OGG support. I can only assume that with the release of Tremor and Xiph's pledge to give free engineer to time to companies that a company would be foolish not to take advantage of free development. If you take the Slashdot Effect into consideration, eventually the emails and phone calls for OGG support in future devices will be heard, quickening the availability of such devices.

    --
    Ayup
  85. Ogged! by ziegast · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, ogg had a meaning as a verb in Netrek - "Let's go ogg a base". If you look at the NWfusion article, scroll down and read all of the "I won't buy it because it doesn't support Ogg" comments. Take that feedback and smoke it! They were Ogged!

    It reminds me of the Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf campaign to People's Most Beautiful Person poll.

  86. Expensive? Not really ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    The MPD-AP20U will cost under $300 and will be available in November through retail outlets and Sony's Web site.

    Last I checked, to get all the functions of this device seperately you'd be spending over $1,000. Then when you pack it all into one small case and make it portable ... that usually doubles the price of the technology. But not here - it's less than a third!

    $300 is a DARN fine buy, if you ask me. Though, I don't need one of these because I have hardware to do all the functions independantly, and no need to be portable about it. But it would make a cool Christmas present for a geek relative.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  87. Can you read? by Find+love+Online · · Score: 2, Informative

    When connected to a television or PC, the device can also become a DVD player for watching movies

    That's the second half of the 5th paragraph in the artical.

    Come on people. It's not that hard. (and +5 informative? Whatever)

    1. Re:Can you read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm- actually the zdnet guy can't read - the
      actually press information from sony states that there are THREE connections: USB 2, headphone and memory stick. They also mention nothing about tvs.

      http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/2873

  88. CDs and DVDs have requirements differences by aksansai · · Score: 1

    The constant linear velocities (CLV) of CDs and DVDs are different - very different. DVD discs in themselves are also designed differently. DVDs can be configured as follows (taking account only one side of the disc): single layer or dual layer.

    The normal 1X speed CLV CD-ROM spins a CD at about 495rpm.

    The normal 1X speed CLV DVD-ROM spins a single layer DVD at about 550rpm to 700rpm. A dual layer DVD is spun at 1100rpm to 1400rpm - effectively double.

    So even at the very basic speeds of CDs and DVDs, DVDs require more power simply by having to spin the disc a bit faster than a CD.

    --
    Ayup
  89. bus power or wall wart? by g4dget · · Score: 2

    Is this thing bus powered/bus rechargeable, or does it require the use of a wall wart?

  90. USB 2.0 is FREE - FireWire requires licensing fees by aksansai · · Score: 1
    FireWire was an excellent idea for fast access to portable devices. Unfortunately, the technology came at a price most manufacturers do not want to actually pay. USB 1.x became so popular because most portable devices tend to be simple (hubs, HID, etc.) without being levied a cost to implement the technology.

    Here is an excerpt from MacNN (Mac News Network) talking about the benefits of USB 2.0 over FireWire -

    Also in USB 2.0's favor is its free licensing. Apple initially charged as much as $1 per port for devices using its proprietary FireWire technology. While that price has since dropped to 25 cents per device regardless of ports, which is paid to a consortium of developers, companies wishing to use USB 2.0 technology will be free of having to pay any royalties. Their devices will, however, be forced to pass a series of independent tests to obtain USB 2.0 certification.

    The full article can be read here. Apple's retraction of the $1 per port licensing fee came a bit late in the game, evidenced largely but the overwhelming backing of USB 1.x in portable devices versus the limited selection of FireWire devices.
    --
    Ayup
  91. It's Wednesday... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    ...I suppose today is "ooh! Sony's cool!" day.

    TOMORROW must be "Sony is an evil member of the RIAA and the MPAA" day.

    Silly me, I thought Sony was a member of the RIAA and the MPAA, with all that implies, 24 x 7 x 365...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  92. Do you know what RTFA means? by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    Actually, you're the one who needs to read the fucking article.

    When connected to a Windows or Macintosh computer, the device can serve as a CD-RW drive for recording digital content or backing up computer data. When connected to a television or PC, the device can also become a DVD player for watching movies

    But thanks for insulting everyone who Can read, you illiterate moron.

    1. Re:Do you know what RTFA means? by 3583+Bytes+Free · · Score: 1
      All I can say is that I bothered to look at the actual specs of the unit. There is nothing that indicates that you can connect the unit to a TV and play DVD-Video discs. The only thing that you can do with it is connect it to a PC and play DVD-Video using PowerDVD or other software loaded onto the PC.

      Would you classify the DVD-ROM drive in a PC as a DVD Player? Not really, because that would confuse it with a standalone DVD player. That exact confusion is here. It's a DVD-ROM drive, but not a DVD player.

      But thanks for the insult. If I was illiterate, at least I wouldn't have to read your insults.

  93. weekly grammar check by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    First off, The thing is NOT that cool. Now, I might go out and buy a MP3/CD/DVD audio player for my car, with some sort of cool face plate, but this is excessively silly.

    secondly:

    the plural of mp3 is mp3s, if the mp3 owned something then that object would be the mp3's. same with CDs, DVDs, and the general pronoun it.

    Geez people. I can't believe I'm the first person to notice this.

    --
    hmmmm?
  94. MD vs. MP3 by swb · · Score: 2

    I bought a deck and portable player about 5 years ago, before MP3 got any real traction. I loved it at the time and still use it occasionally.

    My guess is that it didn't really take off because about the time it started getting market traction (reasonable prices, Best Buy-type availability) MP3 began to really take off and stole its momentum.

    My biggest wish was that Sony had embraced MP3 more openly. The portable MD players and media would be an awesome combination for playing MP3s -- a couple of hours of 128k MP3s per disc, and far far cheaper than flash memory, as well as more portable to other devices (car, etc) which things like the iPod can't do because they have fixed storage.

    All they would have had to do was issue a portable and/or home deck recorder with a USB port and some basic software for transfering MP3 files directly to the media.

    There was a great April fools mockup of a Palm/MD player that could play MP3s as well, it would have been dynamite.

  95. Look at it subjectively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Note to mods: I do not post flamebait, and I never troll. Getting modded such for considered responses is killing

    Back under your bridge, troll.
  96. Here is the link - $99 at Target online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Target's website has it listed as $99 dollars, so technically you are right, it isn't under $80. Maybe he saw it on sale.

    Koss CDVD Player by Koss

  97. Sony can bite me by Ear+Phantom · · Score: 1

    I returned three (count them, three) different Sony walkman MP3 players because they all had TERRIBLE skipping problems when playing MP3s. Also during this ordeal, the store's display model Sony boom box had an entirely different set of problems where it would start ignoring some (about 50%) of the MP3s on a disc.
    The end result is that I ended up buying a Philips MP3 walkman that I've yet to experience any sort of problem with.
    Sure, Sony has very beautiful products, but they tend to IGNORE THE PRIMARY FUNCTION OF THESE PRODUCTS in favor of style.

    I wouldn't trust them with any cutting-edge media device, period.

  98. playstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forget VCD, can it do playstation?

    Find a way for me to hook up a controller and have it run playstation games, and i am so buying this :)

  99. Eh, still doesn't explain the difference by splorf · · Score: 2

    I mean we're talking about a factor of 3 here. Really, the DVD/CD mechanism shouldn't need much power. This is a $300 device, so they can easily put in a large (say 32 MB) ram buffer, which will hold 1/2 hour of music at MP3 bit rates. So twice an hour they can spin up the disk, transfer 32MB of music in a few seconds, and spin the disk back down. That shouldn't use much total power at all. Where is the power going really?

  100. ITS A CD-RW by 2057 · · Score: 1

    it just doesnt play it can record also!

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
  101. It doesn't Support DIVX by seier · · Score: 1

    Next please!

  102. Nice, but not top-quality by leandrod · · Score: 2

    Too pricey for something that doesn't play Ogg, doesn't have Firewire connector.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  103. Well, good for you. by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    If the artical is wrong, chastizing people who belive it for not reading it dosn't really make that much sense.

    1. Re:Well, good for you. by 3583+Bytes+Free · · Score: 1
      I was chastising 1) the person who submitted the article, and 2) the /. editors. Perhaps it was unreasonable to come down on the guy who was just submitting the story that he thought was accurate. Still, I think it was very easy to find info which contradicts what is in the story (for instance, on the sony website).

      Some might say that the editors don't have any responsibility to check the facts of a story before they post it. I disagree. I think there is due diligence which is proper and wasn't done.

      So maybe instead of RTFA, it's check the facts, man.

  104. Yeah, but... by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure Sony didn't have to pay, or something like that, given their involvement in the development of firewire.

    Besides, this thing costs more then a PS2, and that has firewire...

  105. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The so-called "desktop metaphor" of today's workstations is instead an
    "airplane-seat" metaphor. Anyone who has shuffled a lap full of papers
    while seated between two portly passengers will recognize the difference --
    one can see only a very few things at once.
    -- Fred Brooks

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...