Slashdot Mirror


Blogger Hacked

WCityMike writes "Blogger has been severely hacked into, with users' passwords and e-mail addresses being replaced with 'hacx0redbyme' or 'hax0redbyme.' Apparently, attempts to change your password or other information do not succeed due to a major database problem. Blogger currently has no official news: its main page simply apologizes for being down for repairs and its status blog has no information, probably suffering from the same accessing problem as other blogs. In the meantime, discussion, information, and advice is appearing on the weblogs of Anil Dash and Tom Coates, as well as this QuickTopic thread. Glad I use another journaling service." We usually try to avoid "Site X Hacked!" stories, but since this affects so many people - and, heh-heh, they don't have anywhere else to talk about it - here you go.

340 comments

  1. A bit mean. by scumdamn · · Score: 3, Funny

    How could he say "heh-heh"? Blogging is a required service of the internet now! Without Blogs, what are we? Blogs are what seperates us from the animals! (well, that and product placement)

    1. Re:A bit mean. by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny
      Blogs are what seperates us from the animals
      Thats true. You never see dogs boring each other witless with the irrelevant minutiae of their lives. Mind you, dog's can lick actually their own genitals, which is pretty much what blogging is a substitute for...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:A bit mean. by delphi125 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Mind you, dog's can lick actually their own genitals, which is pretty much what blogging is a substitute for...

      Why does a dog lick its balls? Because it can. And mostly, they do. Unlike humans weblogging. I'm sure many more can than do. And if they do, you don't really have to read them, or at least it is easier to ignore than the dog that just humped your leg. And as to boring each other witless, no they will never get bored sniffing each others arses. I suppose that is what really separates us.

    3. Re:A bit mean. by redragon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      "...which is pretty much what bloggin is a substitute for..."

      Of course, most dogs don't watch each other licking their genitals, it's "just one of those things." We however enjoy watching (reading) one another doing this.

      --
      - Sighuh?
    4. Re:A bit mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. Fucking hilarious.

    5. Re:A bit mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blogs are for simpletons and me-too morons. Can't you make a web page? You have to use a "service?" Bunch of mac-using fruit morons.

    6. Re:A bit mean. by scott1853 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're absolutely correct. People need a place to discuss topics ranging from the great tasting new Pepsi Twist to the new Chicago Style Deep Dish Pizza from Pizza Hut that's so deep, you'll need to eat it with a fork.

      Without blogging capabilities we would be just like animals you would see on The Crocodile Hunter on Animal Planet, Wed. and Sat at 8pm, 11pm, and 3am.

      All in all, blogging gives us purpose, and gives us a sense of comfort, similar to the new E-Class from Mercedes-Benz

    7. Re:A bit mean. by fermion · · Score: 1
      no, what seperates us from the animals is that we do not lick our own genetalia
      -Red Dwarf

      But then this is mostly because most of us cannot reach our own genetalia and must find a kind person to do it for us.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:A bit mean. by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      BRAVO! How could that have been any more perfect?
      Moderators, do your job.

    9. Re:A bit mean. by 1155 · · Score: 1

      "Blogs are for simpletons and me-too morons. Can't you make a web page? You have to use a "service?" Bunch of mac-using fruit morons."

      Actually, I know a php developer that blogs. Not that I find any fun in it, but he likes doing it.

    10. Re:A bit mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Thats true. You never see dogs boring each other witless with the irrelevant minutiae of their lives. Mind you, dog's can lick actually their own genitals, which is pretty much what blogging is a substitute for...


      true enough, but while the dog's licking thier own bits and each others orafices serves some kind of purpose, bloggers are nearly entirely useless. Actually I always thought that the best parrallel to blogging was the jerry springer show: sure you can brag about what a loser you are to the public at large, and jerry springer fans will complain that you "Don't have to watch it", but really the best solution to the problem is a little napalm.

      as for the humourous arguement that somehow blogs "might be worthwhile to historians" perhaps in the same way that old trash becomes "valueable" to specialized trash collectors, i give you the poster child of blogging that i ran into while trying to give bloggers a fair shot from the last time
    11. Re:A bit mean. by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      Hehe. I wish I had mod points right now...

    12. Re:A bit mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BRAVO! How could that have been any more perfect?

      He could've checked his URLs and\or used the preview button!

    13. Re:A bit mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anil what?

      Is that another hacker name?

      Like Anil sex for gays?

      I heard that site is a hate website, the anil one that is.

  2. And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Authorities were puzzled by the seemingly strange rash of "FIRST HACK!!!" posts on slashdot.org that arose shortly thereafter.

  3. heh by gornar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Blogckdown!

  4. I'm glad I don't use a blog by LordHunter317 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wouldn't want some l337 hax0r coming in and reading everything about my personal life...

    Oh wait, everyone can do that.

    Doh!

    1. Re:I'm glad I don't use a blog by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      Why do they even bother having passwords? Can't they just have it so it only accepts PGP-encrypted emails?

    2. Re:I'm glad I don't use a blog by miratim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, god forbid people learned all about my bowel movements or something, that would be an invasion of my privacy!

      --
      ~ The Fudge Report @ http://mywebpages.comcast.net/fudgereport/
    3. Re:I'm glad I don't use a blog by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, I'm sure the braintrust that makes up the majority to bloggers will hop all over PGP.

      --

      This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

    4. Re:I'm glad I don't use a blog by dAzED1 · · Score: 2

      I wish I had some mod points atm, cause that was worth a laugh ;)

      Here we all, all worried about our privacy, and there are all these people that want to spread their personal info all over. I don't personally see the voyeurism that would justify this sort of nonesense. I mean, there's freaking books on how to do this crap, for pete's sake. Eh.

  5. no where else to talk about it.... by CySurflex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah "they don't have anywhere else to talk about it" is definitely a good reason. BTW, my mom doesn't have anywhere else to talk about her recipes.

    1. Re:no where else to talk about it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure she does... try the weblog at DinneReview.com :)

  6. Heh-heh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does that 'heh-heh' read as pure schadenfreude?

    1. Re:Heh-heh? by xactoguy · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know... Schadenfreude is pleasure derived from the misfortune of others. And yea, definitely Schadenfreude in this story. :)

      --


      And so we go, on with our lives
      We know the truth, but prefer lies
      Lies are simple, simple is bliss
    2. Re:Heh-heh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it does, it is a comment by M i c h a e l, the socially inept serial troller.

  7. wrong category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security? This should have been categorised as funny.

  8. Missing option: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What the fuck is a blog?

    1. Re:Missing option: by Verloc · · Score: 2

      Ok, maybe I'm wrong, but moderating the parent as Flamebait is just dumb. He's asking a question, and even though he swore he's not baiting anybody!

      People, don't negativly moderate! Nobody really reads at 0 anyway. I mean, if a guy posts at 3 by default and it's a baaaaad post, then maybe, but not an AC! If you moderate good posts up rather than bad posts down, all the people reading at 3 or more will be better off, and I don't think many read at less than that (unless they're moderating).

    2. Re:Missing option: by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1, Troll

      I always read at 0 or -1 simply because of the collective stupidity of moderators. Perfectly good posts get modded down way too often.

    3. Re:Missing option: by Verloc · · Score: 1

      And you've ALREADY been moderated as a Troll.

      my g0d.

    4. Re:Missing option: by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Blog is shorthand for web log. Some would consider Slashdot a blog, since the authors are only posting whatever interests them, but most blogs are just Joe User posting inane crap like, "Ok, I'm going 2 the movies 2nite. I hope Ring doesnt' sux0r as bad as XXXX! Hahaha!"

      BTW, if you want a news/blog script, but don't want to host it on somebody else's web host (read: you have your own space), and you can run Perl CGI scripts, check out BANG!, a nifty little open-source news script.

  9. Blogger's troubles by spookysuicide · · Score: 5, Informative

    Blogger has been having a lot of troubles lately, if you can find your own web hosting, you may want to consider using the very easy to set-up movable type.

    --
    yes i run a goth/punk/emo porn site.
    1. Re:Blogger's troubles by glytterati · · Score: 1

      yeah - go movabletype.
      or even livejournal.

      blogger aint shit.

    2. Re:Blogger's troubles by inerte · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or Drupal, a superior tool IMHO.

    3. Re:Blogger's troubles by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, *if* you can find your own web hosting. I mean, web hosting with MySQL and Perl can be found for a couple of bucks a month now. If you can't afford that, nobody wants to visit your cheesy Geocities-linked blog anyway.

    4. Re:Blogger's troubles by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      MoveableType is definitely spiffy... Two thumbs up! :)

    5. Re:Blogger's troubles by KingAdrock · · Score: 1

      blah... write your own software.

    6. Re:Blogger's troubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does mary like to shag?

      More Mary Pics!

    7. Re:Blogger's troubles by namespan · · Score: 2

      MT is pretty sweet, but.... as it gets more popular, it too will probably be hacked.

      Your best hope to remain hack free is to design your own system from scratch. Preferably using some ungodly combination of Java, Fortran, XSLT, XML, and a custom database you wrote in C for the fun of it.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    8. Re:Blogger's troubles by mjj12 · · Score: 1

      I have been thinking of moving from Blogger to somewhere else myself, given the various hassles that the site has had over the last few months. That said, has anyone else noticed that the the site has been particularly unstable over the past few days? I have noticed quite a few downs. Is this in any way related to the hack?

    9. Re:Blogger's troubles by taernim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Livejournal is another great substitute for Blogger... plus, it's open source. Always a bonus. =)

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    10. Re:Blogger's troubles by Gogl · · Score: 2

      Amen to Movable Type. Good stuff, easy to set up, yes I know I'm repeating what others are saying but I'll also shamelessly self promote as I run my site with MT:

      www.proles.net (the one I link to in my sig)

      Whee self promotion...

  10. I'm sad to see it happen by Inthewire · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry to see it happen but I'm not surprised. Everyone's a target these days.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  11. Blogs, who need em? by zaren · · Score: 3, Informative

    I signed up for a blog once, to see what all the fuss was about. I ended up scrapping it and going back to doing page entries manually. It ended up being MUCH less hassle than having to use someone else's software, and then having to go back and re-tweak things with it. Editing HTML from the command line in a shell is much more time-efficient, IMHO.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:Blogs, who need em? by wrax · · Score: 0

      Editing HTML from the command line in a shell is much more time-efficient, IMHO.
      I might remind you that you are posting on a blog now? A weblog makes for a MUCH easier site setup and maintinance experience. Check out Postnuke for an example of a very easy to setup blog.

    2. Re:Blogs, who need em? by hansk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, but for a majority of web users, a simple blogging application is the way to go. And because these easy-to-use blog apps have been provided, that's why they have become popular.

    3. Re:Blogs, who need em? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Web logs are amazingly convenient for people who don't have the skills to edit from the command line. Remember, most people on the internet aren't as savvy as you or I are, and to them, blogs are an easy and efficient means to updating their personal site. Don't put them down simply because they found a way onto the web without your skill level.

    4. Re:Blogs, who need em? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Dude, your website has been hacked. Someone posted a bunch of satanic marsupial propaganda!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:Blogs, who need em? by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is good and all from your standpoint, being comfortable with HTML an all. However at our org. I needed to provide a way for our PR person to be able to update news pages all on her own.

      Moveabletype works great for this (since I'm not a hardcore perl programmer, it was nice to have someone else do that work). I spent a few days building and modifying the page templates and setting up the site. Now all she has to do is login to a page, add a title and main story and click publish. Instantly several pages are updated with the appropriate news information, archives and search links, etc. Very nice since I don't have to waste time getting the information from her each time and create a new page. Great for her, because she can update the news website anytime she gets a press release.

      I think Blogger itself is somewhat bland, mostly for the novice/home user wanting to get a voice out. For the professional there are some impressive tools that will save you time (Movabletype or Radio UserLand)

      - A non-productive mind is with absolute zero balance.
      - AC

    6. Re:Blogs, who need em? by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      I am very competent with HTML, UNIX tools, and designing/building/maintaining web sites. I used to use my .plan as my blog by writing a web interface in Perl for people to browse entries and even search through them.

      LiveJournal made me scrap it though. It has a well-defined network interface, and a solid official client so I can update my journal from anywhere (and I could choose from 10s of others if the official client gives me trouble). It also allows web updates. At $60/year it is cheaper than buying a new domain, and I want a separate one to keep it anonymous. And finally I didn't want to bother writing a comment system, which LiveJournal provides.

    7. Re:Blogs, who need em? by tylerdave · · Score: 1

      You pay $60/year for a domain?

    8. Re:Blogs, who need em? by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      $30/yr at register.com
      + $20/mo for a web account with shell,PHP,MySQL
      -----------------------
      $270/year

    9. Re:Blogs, who need em? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Efficient? Ok, so you sit around and make HTML web pages, while I'll "ineffeciently" use my own blog system with a MySQL back end and searchable archives and a comments system.

      Oh, and when you wanna add an entry, you go ahead with your "efficient" HTML editing, and I'll add my entry using a simple web form.

      Efficient indeed. pshaw.

    10. Re:Blogs, who need em? by jacobito · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, I agree completely. I can't for the life of me understand, for example, why those lazy Slashdot people waste their time with a content management system.

    11. Re:Blogs, who need em? by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      I use BANG!. It's remarkably easy to set up, and very lightweight (no MySQL database and minimal CPU load).

      The advantage of using a web-based news/blog system is that you can post from anywhere you have internet access.

    12. Re:Blogs, who need em? by roybentley · · Score: 1

      domainmonger is only $17 per year, including dns hosting.

    13. Re:Blogs, who need em? by Kirruth · · Score: 1

      Web logs are amazingly convenient for people who don't have the skills to edit from the command line.

      Woah, back up there a moment, cowboy. People like that really exist? I mean, how do they set up cron jobs and stuff?

      --
      "Well, put a stake in my heart and drag me into sunlight."
    14. Re:Blogs, who need em? by ahecht · · Score: 1

      I use blogger because I am not always at a computer that has a decent FTP program, so it is easier to just go to blogger.com, enter in my new HTML, and have it automatically upload and format it for me.

    15. Re:Blogs, who need em? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      besides.. if you really got enough time to hand-edit the html you should have enough time to write your own blog-kinda-thingy in jsp/php/perl/whatever.

      it's much more faster and less annoying to keep your ramblings up to date that way.. and they're easily editable too if you're the kinda person who wants to change what he said about someone later..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  12. Blogger runs windows..... by xtremex · · Score: 1

    That explains it....trusting your FTP server information on a Windows server should learn ya :)

    --
    If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    1. Re:Blogger runs windows..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who uses FTP anymore (besides anonymous) for transfering files and passwords? The passwords go in clear text, ya know. They were really waiting to be hacked.

    2. Re:Blogger runs windows..... by ChazeFroy · · Score: 5, Informative

      My money is that these guys got in with an application-level hack, not an OS/server hack. The biggest fault of applications, especially web applications, is a failure by the programmer to do input validation.

      Apache, perl, and php are vulnerable to the same type of hacks, it's not just Microsoft.

    3. Re:Blogger runs windows..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THere was an insecurity on a single LINUX box that allowed the hack. Arrogant slashdotters.

  13. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, since the home page just says the site is down, I'll have to ask here. wtf is blogger?

    1. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Cache shows the site had: " Over 750,000 people have started. Isn't it your turn to say what's on your mind?" See the cache for more site info

    2. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome out from under your wet rock!

  14. Good for them by photon317 · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I hate the word blog and all its derivatives, they deserve it for promoting this pop-culter-esque net phenomenon. Either you run a news site, a discussion site, a community, a personal journal or something along those lines. Blog is a stupid term someone made up to sound cool.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:Good for them by Nikkos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blog is short for Web Log.

      Say "web log" 5 times fast and you'll understand why.

      I don't see anything "pop-culture-esqe" about it.

      Nikkos

    2. Re:Good for them by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And how many people still use the term "electronic mail"?

    3. Re:Good for them by Powercntrl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate the word blog and all its derivatives, they deserve it for promoting this pop-culter-esque net phenomenon. Either you run a news site, a discussion site, a community, a personal journal or something along those lines. Blog is a stupid term someone made up to sound cool.

      As a *nix command, blog would be perfect. Hell, you've already got grep, cat, fsck, mount, umount, etc... Short commands with weird names, it'd fit in perfectly!

      As a name for a personal journal however, it ranks right down there with OGG. These don't sound like technology terms, they sound like something a half-drunk mechanic would say to you... "OGG, your oil is all bloggy, your engine is fscked."

      Personally, I have no need for a blog... As it stands, no one visits my home page (which basically consists of a standard AOL profile-type "about me" page, some MP3s of songs I made in Sonic Foundry Acid and a few free crappy VB programs) anyway so even if I HAD a life and things to write about, only thing that'd ever read it are the webcrawler bots. That's kinda depressing actually... I better schedule an appointment with my shrink.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    4. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "blog" is the sound my cat makes when throwing up.

    5. Re:Good for them by FuzzyMan45 · · Score: 1

      By that comparison, since the term "electronic mail" was later shortened to e-mail by lazy people, shouldn't we change "web log" to w-log or wlog, instead of "blog"?

    6. Re:Good for them by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, I'm sorry. Because someone uses a term you don't like, they deserve to be hacked? That's absurd. I'm sorry you have a personal problem with a certain combination of letters.

      It's not like "blog" was created by an ad agency, or by some company to sell it's product. It's a contraction of "Web Log", which is what these types of sites are. Don't like the word? Don't use it. But don't wish an attack on someone because you find time in your day to hate a contraction.

    7. Re:Good for them by oliverthered · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well shouldn't they have called it wog, isn't there a little bit of predujice in not calling it by the obvious name.
      Blog is racist because it should be wog

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    8. Re:Good for them by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

      Blog is a stupid term someone made up to sound cool.

      Actually, no, what happened was everyone was calling it a 'weblog', which was naturally shortened to 'blog'.

      This is just the latest in a long line of multi-syllable words shortened to single-syllable words, bro.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    9. Re:Good for them by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that "web log" is actually pronounced "wee-blog." Thus was the term "blog" coined.

      --

      I write in my journal
    10. Re:Good for them by GargoyleMT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or, alternatively, "email". I once read a great write up on why to not hyphenate "e-mail," but it was so wonderful that I've forgotten it. And you know how trying to find a URL to something is usually like a needle-in-haystack adventure.

    11. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well moron, since "w-log" has 4 syllables and just plain looks strange; and since "wlog" has two syllables and is hard to pronounce for English speakers, don't you think that the one syllable, easy -to-pronounce, "blog," is a much more suitable form of "web log?"

      Damn you're a moron.

      Moron.

    12. Re:Good for them by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

      This would put you in the ~40% of the slashdot population that hates that word. I admit, I hate it too, such a stupid word.

    13. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it. You hate it because non-geek types are using it. The same reason why most geeks hate anything else "popular".. we strive to set ourselves apart from the rest of society in a small (for some of us) way.

      I'm sure you won't admit it (and this will be troll/flamebait etc), but its probably true.

    14. Re:Good for them by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
      No, because in addition to shortening the amount of type needed, "electronic mail" to "email" is a shortening from 5 syllables to 2, making it easier to say. "weblog" to wlog increases the number of syllables from 2 to 4.

      (No, I don't "blog" nor do I understand what the big deal with them is.)

    15. Re:Good for them by FuzzyMan45 · · Score: 1

      ah... i didn't even think of syllables...durr me. thanks for pointing that out

    16. Re:Good for them by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Haha, here's great proof of moderators moderating based on their opinion of the subject matter (taken from my post above as of about 2:30pm cst):

      Moderation Totals: Flamebait=1, Troll=1, Insightful=3, Interesting=2, Overrated=2, Total=9.

      Most moderators are just using it as another avenue to push their opinion, which is sad.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    17. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember when a web log was the server/site access status log.

    18. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      web log... web log... weblog... weblog... pretentious loser.

      Yeah, you're right, I see what you mean now.

    19. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop your sentimental crybaby talk.
      you sound like a faggot.

    20. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hate the word blog and all its derivatives...Blog is a stupid term someone made up to sound cool.

      I hate the word "troll" too, but sometimes a word just fits the bill.

    21. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know people are becoming really stupid when someone gets modded +5, Insightful for pointing out the obvious.

    22. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a homophobe and a very bad troll.

    23. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>>Oh, I'm sorry. Because someone uses a term you don't like, they deserve to be hacked?

      No, they deserved to be hacked because bloggers are mostly a bunch of pretentious, shallow clownboats. Plus they were running IIS.

      Hell, they got hacked. It's not like people were lined up against a wall and shot or anything. Just a little fun, so some weepy young devotchka cannot update her trendy little blog now, boohoo.

      Next I hope people hack MTV's site, and then Vogue and TeenBeats sites. And then they should take down the sites advocating other brainless pop culture feces like "Am I Hot or Not" and the Warner Brothers home page.

      Creative crime is necessary in this day and age. Its fun!

    24. Re:Good for them by vldmr_krn · · Score: 1

      Don't like the word? Don't use it. But don't wish an attack on someone because you find time in your day to hate a contraction.

      Why, it's his insensitive wishing that's probably responsible for this tragedy in the first place. What would we do without right-thinking people like you to show us the way?

  15. Meanwhile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    .... the 12 people who actually care about blogs at all are furious that their lives just got a little more pitiful.

    1. Re:Meanwhile.... by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

      2:13 AM
      Someone hacked my blog. Ignore previous post about "Mandy is a sorry loser". Do not ignore October 20th post with the same title, as this was intentional.

    2. Re:Meanwhile.... by oldstrat · · Score: 5, Funny

      /.
      That's cruel and completely not true.
      The 4 of us handled it completely without anger and substituted by sending each other text messages on our cell phones.

    3. Re:Meanwhile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a snarky, trolling comment about pitiful lives coming from a Slashdot Anonymous Coward. I applaud your taste in irony, sir.

  16. Blogout. by b0r0din · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good thing I chose hax0redbyme as my original password. Ahh, the 1337 L1phs7y13.

    1. Re:Blogout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are not l33t cause you are my 8i7c4

    2. Re:Blogout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does "L1phs7y13" mean?

    3. Re:Blogout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lifestyle, if you're 14 years old and lightly retarded.

  17. recommendation by flanker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disable or reset the password of the account used to FTP your blog to your web server ASAP.

    --
    Left shift 1 for e-mail...
    1. Re:recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flanker, you wanker, this doesn't do anything other than provide a false sense of security.

    2. Re:recommendation by Poro · · Score: 1
      Left shift 1 for e-mail...

      The way you have spam protected your email-address works only for certain keyboard layouts. For example, I have finnish keyboard layout and left-shifting '/' gives me '&' instead of the inteded '.' in the US keyboard layout...

  18. Ok, but... by I'm+not+a+script · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    what the hell is Blogger, and why should I give a fuck ?

    --
    kthx
    1. Re:Ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go you can read up on it with this book

  19. Hacked Blog? OMG! by bellings · · Score: 2

    Thank god my favorite blog wasn't hacked.

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  20. I don't really get blogs... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slashdot, for example, is a lot more of a news and current events site than it is Taco's personal weblog. k5 is more about essays and news. Occasionally, however, I'll stumble across a blog while looking for something else. If I don't know what it is at first, I tend to read it for a few seconds before going back.

    LiveJournal blogs are the worst, IMHO. People go on and on about events and parties with people that 99.99999% of their readers have never met. Once I realize I've stumbled across something like that, I leave it as soon as I can.

    Is it exhbitionism/vouyerism? If I read stories about a person's private life, I'd much rather they beging with a line like, "Dear Penthouse, I've always read the letters in your magazine but never thought that something like that could happen to me..."

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:I don't really get blogs... by eclectric · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, personally, I don't care if any of my readers know who I'm talking about. I really use a weblog to keep track of my state at any given time. This lets me look back and say "oh, that's what I was thinking." I mean, I don't care if I'm the only person in the world who reads my weblog.

      Why put it on the web? Well, there are often times, on irc and in email, when I want to point someone to something I've written... plus, if anyone is visiting my website, then it's possibly they want to know more about me. If they don't, then fine. If they do, then the weblog is there.

    2. Re:I don't really get blogs... by gyratedotorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you dont get blogs, yet you seem to be maintaining one. i dont get that.

      --
      Gyrate Dot Org - "Where high-tech meets low-life"
    3. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Bonker · · Score: 1

      Heheh...

      I write stories, essays, and do art projects. The information on my front page and on my FF page are just notes as to what kind of content I've added to my site.

      I never ever discuss the parties I've been to. If I did, people-- namely me-- would get in a great deal of trouble.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    4. Re:I don't really get blogs... by alanjstr · · Score: 2
      Not all blogs are the same. Here is a review of MetaFilter.com

      "MetaFilter is one of the sometimes confusing class of sites known as 'weblogs.' In the original sense of the word, a weblog is a regularly updated collection of found links, commentaries, and personal reflections, maintained by a single person. For thousands of others, a weblog is simply an online diary - and while some have merit, many more (if not most) feature the "I hate my job," "my cat did the cutest thing," "here's my philosophy" essays which demonstrate that the locks on traditional diaries are there more to protect the public than the author's privacy. Fortunately, MetaFilter falls into the first category, with the distinction that contributions are not made by a single person - this blog has more than 12,000 contributors, and when it comes to scouring the Web, numbers matter."

    5. Re:I don't really get blogs... by PCM2 · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Well, personally, I don't care if any of my readers know who I'm talking about. I really use a weblog to keep track of my state at any given time. This lets me look back and say "oh, that's what I was thinking." I mean, I don't care if I'm the only person in the world who reads my weblog.
      If that were true, you'd keep a diary.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    6. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Surak · · Score: 2, Redundant

      I dunno. I personally read Wilwheaton.net, which is Wil Wheaton's personal blog. And Alan Cox's online journals. And a few others. What's Slashdot but a big, overgrown blog though really?

    7. Re:I don't really get blogs... by zhrike · · Score: 1
      Well, personally, I don't care if any of my readers know who I'm talking about. I really use a weblog to keep track of my state at any given time. This lets me look back and say "oh, that's what I was thinking." I mean, I don't care if I'm the only person in the world who reads my weblog. If that were true, you'd keep a diary.

      Right. Except for the fact that a web-based blog allows one to enter their thoughts from anywhere with a web-browser and access to the internet, which can be quite convenient.

    8. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      or just store it locally

      for those of us who hate writing by hand because it so much slower than typing....

    9. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

      Due to head trauma at a very early age, I'm unable to remember anything from more than three days ago unless I have written it down and reread it. So my journal (blog, whatever) is a way of therapy.

      It seems that it entertains my friends, and I don't try to disappoint, but when all is said and done, if I don't write it down, it's pretty much gone for good.

      --
      [o]_O
    10. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      You know, one of the great primary historical resources has always been collections of letters and personal diaries. Think of a blog as a combination of those two things, placed out there in the world for posterity. Two hundred years from now, I wouldn't be surprised to find that blogs and similar personal narratives are considered to be valuable primary sources. Assuming somebody bothers to archive the things, of course.

      --

      I write in my journal
    11. Re:I don't really get blogs... by DAldredge · · Score: 2

      No. Kuro5hin is about how the everything the USA does is wrong and how American should be USian.

    12. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>LiveJournal blogs are the worst, IMHO. People go on and on about events and parties with people that 99.99999% of their readers have never met.

      Yeah. That place leave a bad taste in my mouth as well.

    13. Re:I don't really get blogs... by RebelTycoon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Voices in your head want out... Make a hole for them.

    14. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Except for the fact that a web-based blog allows one to enter their thoughts from anywhere with a web-browser and access to the internet, which can be quite convenient.

      Except for the fact that a paper based diary allows one to enter their thoughts from anywhere with paper and pen (or pencil).

    15. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Blogger for this very reason. Simply to have access to it anywhere, anytime that there's a computer nearby. I keep links to jobs I'm interested in, OpenSource software that is worth a try, websites with great writing and/or information to be seen, etc. I don't care if anyone wants to read it or not, and if I need to find a link to something I'm telling a person about, but can't remember the site or name of the software, it's on my blog.

    16. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, by your math, if someone keeps a blog to keep in touch with, say, ten of their friends, then they have a million readers. doubtful. chances are that if someone is writing about his/her personal life, his/her friends are going to be the target audience.

      why does everyone assume that because it's on the internet, it's for the rest of the world to care about? yes, you can see it, but there are a lot of sites out there that 99% of the population doesnt care about, and yet, for some reason, people feel the need to just trash those that blog.

      can't you find something else to hate? like terrorism, or supermarkets when they run out of Cool Ranch Doritos?

    17. Re:I don't really get blogs... by jacobito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      LiveJournal blogs are the worst, IMHO. People go on and on about events and parties with people that 99.99999% of their readers have never met. Once I realize I've stumbled across something like that, I leave it as soon as I can.

      The obvious response is that you're not their audience. Most bloggers write to keep up with their circles of friends, not to impress the general public with the minutiae of their daily lives.

    18. Re:I don't really get blogs... by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 4, Funny
      OK, here's the thing: Many people who keep blogs have *actual friends* with whom they like to keep in touch with. This idea of writing to friends may be an unfamiliar concept to you, but it's actually quite an attractive idea: You can tell people about your life, and those who care about you can read it and even write back! It's like writing letters, only you have a log of what you've written which could possibly be valuable at a later date, plus it's "write once, read everywhere" which saves you the time of having to compose a new letter each day for every person you want to know about you, and removes from them the burden of obligation to reply to everything you write!

      AND (this gets even better) because it's publicly accessible, you can meet new people with whom you can make friends! You may not have grown up with access to the online world, but for the generation that has, the internet is a great venue for social interaction.
      Does that help you understand why blogs appeal to some?

      If you come across a blog whose contents do not interest you, it probably wasn't meant for you to read. That doesn't mean there aren't people who do care about that person and enjoy keeping in touch with them.

      Oh yeah, and like the other guy said, your web page seems suspiciously weblog-like. And I liked the rant where you bitch about the Taliban's web page :-)

      --
      Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
    19. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what if you don't know who they are talking about. I started a blog because my girlfriend gave me the address for her's. I thought she and a few other friends might like it. Gets the "how was your day" questions out of the way.

    20. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Zulfiya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, they're not necessarily for you. LiveJounal, in particular, is geared towards reading other LiveJournal entries. That is, you get together a circle of ten or so friends and socialize. It's not about being informative or entertaining, it's about socializing. Since adding and deleting "friends" is more or less trivial, people leave their journals open (or "public") in the hopes that a person interested in other members of their mini-network will find them and become a new "friend".

      You don't get anything out of the little circle o'exhibition because it's really not there for your benefit. Move along.

      --
      -- I'm not evil, I'm ... differently motivated!
    21. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Many people who keep blogs have *actual friends* with whom they like to keep in touch with.

      Translation: Chicks use web logs as a forum to bed for tip money.

    22. Re:I don't really get blogs... by feelsinister · · Score: 1
      LiveJournal blogs are the worst, IMHO. People go on and on about events and parties with people that 99.99999% of their readers have never met. Once I realize I've stumbled across something like that, I leave it as soon as I can.
      I'd really love to know where people get the idea that livejournals are blogs. Being the intelligent folk that you are, I'd have thought that you'd guess from the name that livejournals are... journals.

      Most of the best blogs are hosted on the owners' domain (generally using MoveableType, or b2, and focus very little on the life of the blogger.
    23. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Well, Slashdot didn't even start off as a blog, as I understand it -- it was a place for Taco to post interesting news stories, and then discuss them. A blog is more of a personal journal, talking about your life, as opposed to news in the world at large (or even in several small communities at large).

      I mean, I'm sure there are blogs out there which blur the line between "pure blog" and "news & discussion site" (Slashdot's journal system has begun to do this a bit, although since the journals are hidden a couple of levels down from the front page, it's still primarily what I'd call a news & discussion site).

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    24. Re:I don't really get blogs... by BusDriver · · Score: 2

      If you don't get blogs, why is your website a blog?

    25. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Translation: Chicks use web logs as a forum to bed for tip money.

      Can someone translate this for me?

    26. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But anyone with access to the diary has read and write permissions on it. So NYAH.

    27. Re:I don't really get blogs... by zhrike · · Score: 1


      Except for the fact that a paper based diary allows one to enter their thoughts from anywhere with paper and pen (or pencil).


      Yes, it does...if you bring it along. In any event, it is no "exception" to my preceding point. It is also more convenient in many ways to use a web-based journal...in terms of organization. I can use the date, topic, etc, and find exactly what I am looking for with one click.

      In addition, the original point to which I replied attacked the notion that the original poster "didn't care who read his blog." Using the fact that a diary would be more appropriate, and therefore proved that his assertion was not true...which is ridiculous.

      Further, I can type a lot faster than I write, so in that way it is also more convenient. I would guess that most people who happen to be computer-literate feel similarly about writing vs typing.

    28. Re:I don't really get blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh..... I get it, livejournal blogs are basically big circle jerks!!

      so, which one of you is the usual loser at "soggy biscuit"?

    29. Re:I don't really get blogs... by red5 · · Score: 2

      If I read stories about a person's private life, I'd much rather they beging with a line like, "Dear Penthouse, I've always read the letters in your magazine but never thought that something like that could happen to me..."

      Well, if thats the case. Here you go.

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  21. But... but.... by BMonger · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really didn't cheat on my math test like I said in my blogger!!! Somebody hacked it... yeah... that's it...

  22. Shameless plug for my weblog. by eclectric · · Score: 4, Informative

    Luckily, I was worred when I first setup my blogger account, so i switch to a mysql database on my own webserver instead. Eventually, I ended up using movable type to manage my weblog. If you have access to a mysql database on your webserver, I would really recommend doing this.

  23. How will we do without blogs? by Prince_Ali · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blogs are the next coming of geocities. They clutter the internet with useless information.
    I have a blog, but I only use it to say things like, "Fdisk overflowed when I tried to format my hard drive. Now it is negative 15 Gigs!"
    So yeah, I need to be shot.

    1. Re:How will we do without blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They clutter the internet with useless information

      But how untrue that statement is. One thing that's always great about history is when they find personal correspondance between people of the time. If you watch Ken Burns' Civil War documentary, the most fascinating material (to me) are the excerpts from letters and diaries written at the time, documenting how everyday life went on during the war. Items such as this allow you to truly reconstruct how people actually lived. Not what houses they lived in, or what tools they used, but HOW they lived. How the mundane day-to-day activities were carried out and how people felt about them, etc.

      Imagine reading weblogs from thousands of years ago. To me the idea is absolutely fascinating. I would hope that someone has the mind to keep a few of these weblogs around for people to read in the far future, as stupid as they sound to us now.

    2. Re:How will we do without blogs? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2, Funny

      They clutter the internet with useless information..... So yeah, I need to be shot.


      We'll it isn't completely useless information. At the very least, we know who to shoot.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  24. Re:Missing option: BLOG definition by saskboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    A Blog is a online jounal or diary where lamers [like me] write their daily thoughts and routines so family, friends, strangers, and enemies can garner my life's work, and benefit from my ideas.
    1. Write in blog
    2. ...
    3. Profit!

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  25. I'd mod you up if I could by Anthracks · · Score: 1

    I've hated the word blog since I first heard it, although as some have pointed out it's sort of fitting in that it's almost as retarded as its meaning.

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
  26. Blog = weblog by gosand · · Score: 5, Insightful
    FYI, the term blog comes from the term weblog. It got morphed into "we blog", and the term got overused quite a bit. So a blog is basically a journal.

    I have never used one, or intend to. For some unknown reason, it bacame popular to just ramble out your thoughts into an online journal. Whatever. I don't see why this made the news though...

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Blog = weblog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're using a blog right now dipshit.

    2. Re:Blog = weblog by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      "For some unknown reason, it bacame popular to just ramble out your thoughts into an online journal. Whatever. "

      Then why are you reading Slashdot? Have you read any of CmdrTaco's news postings? ;p

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    3. Re:Blog = weblog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't see why this made the news though...



      They were out of repeat stories today.

    4. Re:Blog = weblog by gosand · · Score: 2
      You're using a blog right now dipshit.

      Well, I suppose you are right (except for the dipshit part). I meant that I don't buy into that crap where you ramble about the details of your life for the world to see. I comment on "news" stories here, so that may be some form of blog. I think the real bloggy part of /. is the ability for people to have friends lists, write journal entries, etc. I don't partake in that stuff, I think it is stupid.

      So blog off you bloggity blogznatch.
      (did I use that term correctly?)

      Hey read my online journal and see what I bought at the grocery store yesterday! Whee.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:Blog = weblog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant that I don't buy into that crap where you ramble about the details of your life for the world to see

      And someone is holding a gun to your head, forcing you to read these things? No? Then it doesn't really concern you, does it?

      News flash: People don't all like the same things. If they did, the world would suck hard.

    6. Re:Blog = weblog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can you run out of repeat stories?

  27. "kick-ass system administrator" by p0rnking · · Score: 1

    A quote from the "status blog"
    "Friday, October 22, 2002 - ... Our kick-ass system administrator, who is always on top of such things, is having a rare respite, and I failed to adequately pick up the slack. Will pay closer attention now..."

    I wonder what would happened if those "kick-ass system administrator" weren't doing their jobs?

    Btw, "status blog" is now sorta updated

    1. Re:"kick-ass system administrator" by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they still think that their system administrator is so 'kick ass'?

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    2. Re:"kick-ass system administrator" by BJH · · Score: 1

      I imagine the status blog now reads, "Our system administrator got his ass kicked."

  28. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now how will we know when she's done her nails or he's bought a new stereo?!

    1. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Funny if I had the points

  29. While Everyone by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    is looking for alternatives. b2 is a really good and powerful altewrnative. PHP, MySQl, and all the goodies.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:While Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's completely insecure (just access /b2register.php and you'll have a valid account that can post anything!) and a pain in the ass to customize.. Also, its code is *dirty*. Anyway, it's better than the damned blogger.com.

    2. Re:While Everyone by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      Ya -- I just turned off registration and pretend that I don't know what good code looks like...And it does a wonderful job for me.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  30. sigh by Yablo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    everyone knows that everything2.com is the best blog site in existence...

    1. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: sig

      You forgot the most important part "...and then themselves."

  31. Huh? by Sexy+Commando · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a second I thought I was looking at /. story generator. It's really been a while to see Something Hacked posts here. Blogger being hacked means loss of productivity, and the weblogs has become metaweblogs.

  32. Status Blog now has info by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Informative
    As of 10:02 am, the status blog now reports:

    Blogger has suffered a security intrusion by a "haX0r." We have all the data that was changed backed up within a couple hours of the attack, so we can have things pretty much back to normal soon. Of course, we're assessing the situation as thoroughly as possible to make sure it doesn't happen again. Also, if you store your FTP login information in Blogger, it wouldn't hurt to change that on your server--though it is unlikely that information was accessed. Sorry for the inconvenience.

    1. Re:Status Blog now has info by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Also, if you store your FTP login information in Blogger, it wouldn't hurt to change that on your server--though it is unlikely that information was accessed. (quoted from web site)

      It is "unlikely" that people got access to an account on your local machine. I think people might want to know either way. Quickly.

    2. Re:Status Blog now has info by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      If your web site is like where I store mine, you actually have to be on their network to change the password. So, except for someone munging my site (sheyeah, like I CARE), it does not matter to me, although moving to MT and a webhosting service is something I have been contemplating for a while. I looked at slash and I won't even begin to try and understand it. I have too many OTHER things to do with my life which is why I used Blogger. Also if something is so important to you that you run around changing your password for your web site just because someone might have it, then why do you have the stuff on the web in the first place? Even if they did do something, you can most likely call your provider and get the password reset and then ftp all of your stuff back up. You DID save your site on your hard disk didn't you???

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:Status Blog now has info by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      If you want to host your own site, but don't want to bother with Slash, check out BANG!. It is pretty easy to set up, and is fairly lightweight (no MySQL required or needed, very low CPU load). It probably won't run on Windows servers (AFAIK no one has ever tried to), but if you're the kind of person who would run Windows on a web server then you'd probably be better off sticking with a service like LiveJournal anyway ;)

  33. Is it just me... by Waab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or does anyone else think it's a bit much for some of these bloggers to be comparing the hack to 9/11?

    I have to wonder what kind of life someone must lead when an attack on their favorite website is as traumatic as the events of that day.

    1. Re:Is it just me... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simple.

      These are asshats who's favorite TV show was preempted by news reports that day.

      So they easily compare to this - their favorite website being temporarily.

      It's about how it affected 'them', not the world.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Is it just me... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      I have to wonder what kind of life someone must lead when an attack on their favorite website is as traumatic as the events of that day.
      Probably the kind of life that involves a server that was located at the WTC. ;-)
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Is it just me... by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to wonder what kind of life someone must lead when an attack on their favorite website is as traumatic as the events of that day.

      One outside of NYC, obviously.

      9/11 may have been horrible and dastardly and evil and all--but "tramatic" it was not for me or anyone within a hundred miles of where I am, exempting those few who lost relatives.

    4. Re:Is it just me... by cjpez · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they were using something called "sarcasm?"

    5. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... wot's "tramatic" mean?

    6. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the blog site (like a lot of other Web sites) was down on 9/11, and that was the biggest way it affected them. Most people care more about direct effects on their own lives than something that happens thousands of miles away. Look at the typical (U.S.) news broadcast: ten minutes on the cost of gasoline, ten seconds on a war in which thousands of people are dying. (There's always a war somewhere in the world.)

  34. the results are in... by ice-nine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    the early posts made on this topic (four of 5 +3+ posts moderated funny) seem to show what most slashdotters think of blogs... they're pretty much a joke. i can't say i agree or disagree, however.

    --
    zing
  35. Hey wait by randomErr · · Score: 1, Funny

    We usually try to avoid "Site X Hacked!" stories, but since this affects so many people - and, heh-heh, they don't have anywhere else to talk about it - here you go.

    Yeah, we can post them in our blo... nevermind.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  36. Re:Missing option: BLOG definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isnt step 2 supposed to be underpants? ...oh wait, that used to be step 1

  37. Lots of services by siliconwafer · · Score: 2, Informative

    *shameless plug*

    There are a LOT of diary/journal/blog services on the web. My personal favorite: Digital Expressions. Not a lot of customization and such, and it has a smaller userbase and a very strong sense of community.

    1. Re:Lots of services by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Full disclosure, Alex...how've you been?

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:Lots of services by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      Hey Dave, I've been pretty well :) How about you? I don't make it over to your site often... but it looks good as usual. Nice to see you've been adding features and catering well to your users :) I like that "recommendations" idea - similar to Karma on slashdot. I toyed around with the idea but nobody seemed to like the idea of having their entries "rated" by others. Ah well.

    3. Re:Lots of services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Dave, hey Alex!

      You two are both pinheads!

    4. Re:Lots of services by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      we know ;) you're an anonymous coward! so HAH!

    5. Re:Lots of services by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Been doing fine.
      The recommendations is a bust. I started out with a list of 50, but it turned over so slowly that I cut it to 25...it still takes about a week for an entry to go from first to last. I haven't taken a hard look at how often it is used, but I think it's like pretty much everything I've set up - people don't use it. The basic functionality is all that seems to get used. Maybe there's a lesson I should extract from that. Quit adding features and concentrate on improving the things they care about.
      Such is life.

      Glad I stumbled across you over here.
      Take care.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  38. MOD Parent up by rppp01 · · Score: 2

    How many of us really didn't know what a blog was? I know I didn't.

    So, basically, an online journal site was hacked. Not sure this is big news, or news that mattered. But it does qualify as news for nerds.

    Thanks, taco

    --
    They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    1. Re:MOD Parent up by entrigant · · Score: 1

      I hadn't a clue.... and now that I do I couldn't care less.

  39. one more pointless joke about blogs by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hacking a blogging site is like littering in a dump.

    1. Re:one more pointless joke about blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Priceless. You get a gold star for that one, sir.

  40. I avoid this crap by not keeping a journal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figure, if someone wants to know what's going on in my life, they'll ask me.

    Journals are for the vain and insecure.

    1. Re:I avoid this crap by not keeping a journal. by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      So what's going on in your life?

  41. Re:script kiddies are sickoes by bellings · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should be treated just like as if they burned down a building, but no, the law doesn't understand.

    They should be treated as if they burned down a building with cute little kitties living inside of it! Because, inside of every blogger there's a cute little kitty, just waiting for you to discover it.

    What these hackers have done is atrocious. It's far, far worse than petty graffiti or vandalism. They have trampled the hearts and emotions of sensitive bloggers everywhere. And for that, there can be no justice -- only bitter revenge.

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  42. Specifically ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Informative
    According to netcraft.com:

    The site blogger.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000.

  43. Sept 11?!?! by jzs9783 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the QuickTopic thread:

    "This is like September the 11th all over again."

    Does that mean the attack on the WTC was a noble cause, causing many to rejoice, point, laugh, and snicker? For humanity's sake, I hope this was the thickest sarcasm ever to form.

    1. Re:Sept 11?!?! by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

      I'm afraid this is a good example of the typical blogger.

      --
      >
    2. Re:Sept 11?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the QuickTopic thread:
      "This is like September the 11th all over again."

      From the original poster:
      "Does that mean the attack on the WTC was a noble cause, causing many to rejoice, point, laugh, and snicker?" [snip]

      It was to some...mostly people with shrapnel from US bombs stuck in their flesh...

      [snip]"I hope this was the thickest sarcasm ever to form.'

      Yeah

    3. Re:Sept 11?!?! by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Personally I think that meant the overload in the server or the inability to post or something. However, I could be wrong, and if I am, that was an extremely insensitve comment and people like that should be severely beaten.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    4. Re:Sept 11?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does that mean the attack on the WTC was a noble cause, causing many to rejoice, point, laugh, and snicker?

      If no one had died or was injured. I'd acctually say yes. It should have been a wake-up call for American citizens that their .gov is a corrupt lier. Unfortunatly, it's just been turned into an excuse for America's shitty .gov to start another war.

  44. All I can say is "thank you!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Gee, my life just isn't the same without being able to read all the inane blogs. Read books, not blogs.

  45. I believe the proper response is ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    D'oh!

    Worst post ever

    1. Re:I believe the proper response is ... by randomErr · · Score: 2

      Thanks, I try my best, or worst as it were :)

      It's Friday, laugh!

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  46. Better hope... by Dynedain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope they did backups.

    And I hope they patch the hole before restoring from the backups.

    More likely they'll dot-bomb.

    Do you know who has your passwords?

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  47. microblogger by flez · · Score: 1

    This is why I use microblogger. Don't have to rely on anyone else's fsck-ups.

  48. hacked again? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I used them for a bit a year ago, when they were hacked. I had to get my ISP password reset because I was stupid and used theie ftp service. Why people would stick with them after that, is beyond me.

  49. Related story by randomErr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MS in blog parody takedown
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/27774.html

    By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco

    It's a pity that Microsoft's Beth Goza, who we teased here last week, has taken down her weblog. Far from wanting to see it disappear, it ought be preserved in a time capsule.

    But not only has Beth's blog gone underground - so has the parody which inspired our story. It's disappeared from no less than five mirror sites.

    Even more extraordinary, a witch-hunt is on to find the perpetrator. One member of the PocketPC community says legal action is being threatened against the author, whose identity remains a mystery.

    "The phrase 'it will soon be out of our hands' was used by one figure close to Beth," we're told.

    It would be remarkable if Microsoft's expensive legal and public relations machinery were deployed in what is essentially a private matter.

    And highly unlikely, too, as parodies are protected under the First Amendment.

    Microsoft's approach to the press is singularly enlightened, when compared to say an Apple. The company takes barbs in good grace, and doesn't deploy feudal divide and rule tactics. It's never, to our knowledge, sued a journalist. Of course it has its favorite hacks, but in general the philosophy is - they're always going to be mean to us, they'll always be around: meanwhile, we have a message to convey, and stuff to sell.

    Evil and elitist?
    So were we being evil and elitist, as some of you suggested?

    As I replied to Jonathan at StretchingThoughts.com, it's onlyelitist if you think that blogs are folks' only form of expression.

    The king of webloggers Jorn Borger - he was the first to use the term and it's still the best - used to use a quote by Tolstoy in his Usenet sig:- "In human stupidity, when it is not malicious, there is something very touching, even beautiful... There always is." And there is something bewitching about Beth's ruminations such as " just for the record i like it when my foods touch" a line worth of Ralph Wiggum.

    No, what's strange is when an attack on one blogger is perceived as an attack on blogging in general. That implies that there can't possibly be a quality threshold in blogdom, and confirms John Dvorak's worst fearsabout groupthink. This is an unnecessarily defensive reaction and quite wrong. If blogs are writing, there's good and bad writing.

    Of course, John was being satirical, and he wasn't decrying blogdom: only the mentality that blogging is in of itself revolutionary and no criticism can be voiced, and no quality threshold can be drawn; that we must not differentiate between good and bad, because it's all somehow equally valid.

    The parody itself was pretty mean and spiteful. But it's a parody. We hope that groupthink doesn't extinguish parodies, as they help us see that the Emperor has no clothes.

    Please let us know if you've been contacted in relation to this investigation. And in the meantime, enjoy some other fine online journals by Microsoft staff:- which might be low on cheap laughs, but high on content:- min jeschwad, Inkblog, and more highlighted in this Kuro5hin thread.®

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  50. Movable Type put the moves on me. by MisterSquid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Movable Type is indeed excellent weblogging donationware. The folks at Movable Type are great at providing requested features and documenting their software. Installation takes (and I mean this) fewer than 15 minutes, set-up maybe 1/2 hour for even the most non-technical of users.

    I would rather run the latest release of Slash and went so far as to even check out chromatic's Running Weblogs with Slash (NB: /.'ers, /. is a weblog) after reading this recent /. story about "Building Online Communities."

    My problem though is that Slashcode requires a dedicated server--or one on which you have root acces--to install. I'm sure this gives Slash many advantages, but those of us who can't afford dedicated server solutions can't make use of those advantages. My web host doesn't even allow shell access.

    Movable Type (and a few other brands of weblog software) offers people with cheap web-hosting solutions to successfully install high-quality, customizable, open-source weblog software. The couple who run Movable Type produce a quality product. Check them out if you want to run weblog software but don't have a lot of money.

    I wonder if the /. crew couldn't be persuaded to come up with a version of Slash that doesn't require a dedicated server . . .

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Movable Type put the moves on me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not gpl though - not free as in freedom, and personally, i wouldn't use anything that isn't.

  51. where the blogs come from? by john_lewmanny · · Score: 1

    Where did all this blog fever came from? I used to read stileproject back in some 3 ot 4 years ago and that is one of the oldest blog-like sites I'm awared of.

    1. Re:where the blogs come from? by FireMotion · · Score: 1

      New, updated content on a website is good.

      And a blog or weblog or journal is just a cheap and easy way to post new content on a site, a legit way to put useless stuff online.

      So, new updated useless content on a website is good.

      --
      http://www.inspirelight.net/
  52. Did anyone else notice.... by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 2, Informative

    the diary-x.com link prevented a slashdot-ing with some very simple code. A simple way of preventing your server from crying uncle.
    I have often thought of writing a little code that blocks refering domains if they refer too many in a set period of time.

  53. How does MT compare to PostNuke? by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    Interested, working with PN for big project, but we are currently deciding whether to code a few features that it sounds like MT already has.

    PostNuke CMS

  54. Another Journalling service by isorox · · Score: 2

    Glad I use another journaling service.

    I like it - that site wont be slashdotted!

  55. Yeah, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a whole generation knows the definition due to a Simpsons episode.

  56. For all those bashing "Blogs" by aengblom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Blogs have achieved one of the most fantastic of things ever on the internet. They killed the personal web site! Anyone been asked to visit anyones "personal web page" recently? I think not!

    Personal web pages were 50 times worse than any blog. It's evolution--not revolution ;-).

    Anyway... My friend has a blog. It's is like the BBS I ran when I was 14. Some friends log in. We talk about intersting things (or not) publicly. Eventually when I did things right, a few extra people came along and we had some good conversations.

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Gee, maybe some of us miss those days of yellow text on purple backgrounds, 5 fonts sizes per page and misformatted tables (done by hand editing HTML, natch). And the blinking text, too. Always a favorite.

      But don't compare blogs to a BBS... those were the days when you actually had to have a brain to get online, versus now, when Bertha Walmartski can blog it up to tell the world that one of her three toy poodles is depressed.

      P.S. some of those awful personal pages still exist. I'd tell you where, but you'd go blind viewing them ;)

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    2. Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" by aengblom · · Score: 4, Funny

      But don't compare blogs to a BBS... those were the days when you actually had to have a brain to get online, versus now, when Bertha Walmartski can blog it up to tell the world that one of her three toy poodles is depressed.

      You never signed on to my BBS did you

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    3. Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "those were the days when you actually had to have a brain to get online, versus now,"

      No, you are wrong. I am still waiting for people to actually use their brain and creativity when online, instead of trying to run a webserver on a carport remote control. It is a shame that the internet has turned into an anarchistic kindergarten because only juveniles can get connected. The reason those awful personal pages exist is that NOONE has anything to say. I wish my grandparents could get on the internet and publish their ideas, experiences and memories instead of kids with fake Britney pr0n and 1337-speak.

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    4. Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" by Deiru · · Score: 1
      I wish my grandparents could get on the internet and publish their ideas, experiences and memories instead of kids with fake Britney pr0n and 1337-speak.

      You've got a great, great point there. I never met my grandfather (on my mother's side) but from what I know about him, he'd always been into technology and loved to tinker around with things. Were he alive today, I'm sure he'd be doing something like this with computers and I'm sure he'd have some great stories to share.

    5. Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" by dswensen · · Score: 4, Informative
      But don't compare blogs to a BBS... those were the days when you actually had to have a brain to get online, versus now

      Give this man a 5, Funny!

      I used to frequent a BBS. The rank stupidity I encountered there still amazes me -- I kept a few logs of some of those exchanges, and my reaction varies between thinking they must have been joking and wondering how they could even operate a keyboard.

      Incidentally, that particular BBS is still running, more than seven years later. I've checked in on a couple occasions, only to find the exact same users, arguing about the exact same things, obsessing over the same miniscule and irrelevant BBS policies, carving the same mountains out of molehills -- seven years later. It gave me the chills. I sometimes wonder if they're not trapped in some kind of Sartrian hell.

      The tools have advanced, there are a lot more people on the net now, but the general level of intelligence (on both ends) is about the same as it always was. What you see in an average blog isn't any more or less insightful than what I saw in the "Grips" or "Non Sequitur" forums on the old BBS.

    6. Re:For all those bashing "Blogs" by qwerpoiu · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, that particular BBS is still running, more than seven years later. I've checked in on a couple occasions, only to find the exact same users, arguing about the exact same things, obsessing over the same miniscule and irrelevant BBS policies, carving the same mountains out of molehills -- seven years later. It gave me the chills. I sometimes wonder if they're not trapped in some kind of Sartrian hell.

      Change "seven years" to "five years", and you've summed up Slashdot quite nicely.

  57. And if that's not enough ... by avoisin · · Score: 1

    Just go and post a story that lists links to their webpage and hand them the slashdot effect.

    I don't know if I can think of anything more pitiful than a hacked web page about stuff no one wants to read that no one could read anyway if they wanted to.

  58. One more reason not to Blog by Winterblink · · Score: 2

    Never trusted it. Give us the username and password of your FTP/Web account? Give me a break. So basically this guy hacked a single database and now could potentially have the login information for THOUSANDS of sites out there. Blogger can keep its service. If I want a Blog, I'll code it myself.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:One more reason not to Blog by KCSteve · · Score: 1

      That's why you have your ISP set up an alternate account that has write access to one directory, that being the one where the blog files are stored.

      But judging by all the other comments here, most of you guys think that people that use Blogger are a bunch of morons or are a bunch of undersexed teenage girls spouting off on how cute the latest TV teen is.

    2. Re:One more reason not to Blog by mborland · · Score: 2
      Never trusted it.

      I'm right on board with you. They didn't seem to do much to secure the database, when I looked at it about over a year or so ago. I became more concerned when they basically became a one-person operation, and have avoided the service like Kryptonite.

      Let this be a lesson--learn to trust your service providers before you jump on board with them. Also, use common sense and avoid services that store your FTP (and possibly ISP!) account info.

  59. The problem with overhyped blogs... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Troll

    ... is not the creator of those blogs who use everything from 500kb animated gifs to multiple embedded flash files to gain attention, no, it's those sad people who clique together and generally agree on everything that the creator writes. Basically, most blogs are from women of all ages and most fans are 14 year pubescent teenagers hoping to read something sexually orientated. Unfortunatly, it almost never goes past this:

    I saw this and that movie and OMG is so r0x0r3d! All my friend on IRC agreed with me, except this Seth person who was being a dickhead again. Oh and my cat threw up sulphuric acid when at my mother's place, ruining the 3000 dollar persian carpet. Sorry moms, pops... Luv ya all, your favourite grrl!

    Something like that, only true blogwhores type allot more and generally convey even less interesting facts... Ah well, at least I'm not wasting my time on stupid overhyped blogs. As for that someone who cracked the Blogger DB; Do something more useful next time your g/f breaks up with you, getting back at her by ruining her blog isn't the brightest thing around.

    1. Re:The problem with overhyped blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, most comments that begin with "basically, most..." are totally uninformed. You don't actually mean "most." You mean "the few that I've encountered." There is a difference.

  60. d00d st0p c0mp1aining ab0ut bl0gs!!!11` by Dachannien · · Score: 0, Troll

    The only thing that makes posting to slashdot any different than writing in a weblog is that weblog entries are longer and have a lower density of profanity. They both are used to shore up the insecurities of imperfect people by giving them somewhere to make themselves feel important.

    So before you rip on blogs anymore, just remember that ur teh sux0r t00 n00b!!!!!111``` hahahaha

  61. Annotated bookmarks by Wee · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You've said it perfectly. I personally write stuff on my website mostly as a form of annotated bookmarks. If I see something cool, or figure some new thing out, I can post it on my site and then go back and find it later and know what I was thinking at the time. And if other people want to check it out, they can. I've posted some fairly helpful (if tiny) tidbits, even if I say so myself, and they do get searched for. My journal is like the margins in my book of the Internet.

    But there is more to it than that. Everyone wants to spout off sometimes. If you have an easy forum for writing stuff down, eventually you'll rant about something. And doing so helps you "save state". You can go back a year later and see where you were mentally. And as you said, it helps people who are at a distance figure out what you've been up to. Having it web-accessible means you can write from anywhere.

    There's nothing wrong with keeping a web journal.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  62. Alternate "weblog" site refusing access from /. by Mario+B · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you try to access the alternate site mentionned in the message (diary-x.com), you will get the following: "Go Away I suggest outside, you look like you could use some sun.". You can access the "normal" website by copy-pasting the address (www.diary-x.com) in your browser instead of using the link (assuming your current page is NOT the slashdot mainpage).

    1. Re:Alternate "weblog" site refusing access from /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (assuming your current page is NOT the slashdot mainpage).


      Ya need a lesson on referrers?
  63. oh thank goodness. by gabec · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I did today: Well my 'blog website is down today. I dunno why. Golly. Luckily enough I found another website (as you can see) where I could babble on and on about absolutely nothing. Felix, (my roommate's cat) is doing just fine, thank you for asking. Did you see the X-Files re-run last week? Oh dear, look at the time. Maybe the normal blog website is back up. *hope*hope*

    1. Re:oh thank goodness. by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      Might not have made a good selection as your site for the substitute blog. With the new introduction of blogging, moderators will be able mod your lives down.

  64. Re:script kiddies are sickoes by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

    Because, inside of every blogger there's a cute little kitty, just waiting for you to discover it.

    Except this one, of course.

    --

    I write in my journal
  65. In additional developments... by Hyped01 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Blogger currently has no official news: its main page simply apologizes for being slashdotted if they re-enable full content, making their downtime for repairs even worse since they'll probably suffer from the same accessing problem as many other sites linked to from /.'s home page."

    :-)

    -Rob

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

  66. Schadenfreude by Grimmtooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, gee, considering the average level of post here, I'm guessing (JUST a guess you understand) that Schadenfreude is about the only way some of these people can inflate thier tiny, shrivelled-up egos.

    Any question of why people think geeks are losers can be answered for the most part by a quick scan of the postings in this story.

    --
    /* .sigs are irrelevant */
  67. I have not figured that one out yet by twitter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    if you can find your own web hosting

    I'm waiting for the day I can host my own web again. Why should anyone have to go any further than their own 486 to put up a website? The quality of free software available and ease of set up is astounding. There are a dozen or so web servers in Debian, and many fine automation programs for putting content onto those sites. It's as easy as:

    1. type deselect

    2. press spacebar

    3. type /apache

    4. press +

    5. repeat steps 3 and 4 for igal and other programs you want.

    6. press enter a few times.

    7. pull up a browser, a command line and an editor and enjoy building your site.

    I'm not sure why everyone interested has not done this. OK, ipchains takes a little more work, but it can be done in a few days with knowlegable help, so you can look at the rest of the web with the rest of your computers. The problem has something to do with the last mile, greedy and stupid publishers and fools that listen to them.

    My cable company has made all but ftp impossible and ftp is painful to most of the people I'd like to reach. Outbound port 80, and 25 are blocked. Most cable companies don't block port 21 because that would kill AOL's instant messenger. Still, the upload rate is crimped worse and worse, and html files don't work well over the system. The overall performance is poor, but I'd rather send my mom there to look at baby pictures than send her to some advert filled crap I don't have any control over now or ever. Eventually they will block port 21.

    It's stupid. My cable company could make more charging $20 a month to three people than $45 to one. I'd recomend people move to cable if cable were really worth anything to me, but it isn't so I don't.

    blogging services are nice, but only needed because the net is not free.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I have not figured that one out yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should anyone have to go any further than their own 486 to put up a website?

      Because it's the obvious but very inefficient solution, for several reasons: The load on a personal blog is usually very low, so dozens or hundreds can be hosted on one machine, which means that the "486" uses 2 magnitudes more power than a cooperative solution. Security is not "a few days with knowledgeable help", security is a process. You have to keep up-to-date with the patches. Software installation is easier if you've done it for hundreds of clients. If blogs are really about the content and not about playing with technology, decentralized cooperations are more efficient. Only if your tweaks or your own personal blog-software are part of expressing yourself would a dedicated webaccount make sense, and even in that case, a hosting solution is more power efficient than a home server.

    2. Re:I have not figured that one out yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Outbound port 80, and 25 are blocked.

      Wow, must make it hard to surf the net...

    3. Re:I have not figured that one out yet by Software · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why not run the webserver on port 21? So the users have to type http://myserver:21/foo.thml in their browsers - no big deal. Of course, you can't run an FTP service, or use AIM, and your bandwidth still sucks, but it's a start.

  68. blogs are just the text version of The Sims... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...or the Osbournes, or Anna Nicole Smith's show, or...

    You're just sitting around watching (reading about) someone else living his* life. Perhaps the Sims is a little better, as you can direct the action.

    Wouldn't it be great to have a life so good that you didn't have time to read about someone else's, or better yet, publish the details of yours (and your thoughts)?

    Well, it is.

    And no, I'm not being lifeless by writing this because I have to be at my computer now; I'm at work This also means I'm getting paid to write this, so double bonus for me.

    * his is used instead of the incorrect "their" or the annoying "his/her". The author recognizes that women have blogs but has chosen to standardize on "his"

    1. Re:blogs are just the text version of The Sims... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Do people actually read blogs or do they just write them?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:blogs are just the text version of The Sims... by standsolid · · Score: 1

      I am so scared of SIMS online... Imagine a place where compouter nerd with no lives come together to share ideas and play around all anonymously, wasting their times. wait...

      they'd probably talk about news inssues 8 hours late too. Saying thins like
      "Shumamunu shoo da da beowulf cluster shumanan do" or
      "SHEEMA! gatse.cx DO LAMMA!"

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    3. Re:blogs are just the text version of The Sims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Main Entry: their
      Function: adjective
      2 : his or her : HIS, HER, ITS -- used with an indefinite third person singular antecedent

    4. Re:blogs are just the text version of The Sims... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      oh yeah?

      Usage Problem. His, her, or its

      Usage note at they:

      The use of the third-person plural pronoun they to refer to a singular noun or pronoun is attested as early as 1300, and many admired writers have used they, them, themselves, and their to refer to singular nouns such as one, a person, an individual, and each...The usage is so common in speech that it generally passes unnoticed. However, despite the convenience of third-person plural forms as substitutes for generic he and for structurally awkward coordinate forms like his/her, many people avoid using they to refer to a singular antecedent out of respect for the traditional grammatical rule concerning pronoun agreement. Most of the Usage Panelists reject the use of they with singular antecedents. Eighty-two percent find the sentence The typical student in the program takes about six years to complete their course work unacceptable.

  69. Ah crap... by hax0redbyme · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dammit, I've been hacked HERE, too. Shows you the danger of using the same password everywhere...

  70. And we care why...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus... now people have to find another cathartic outlet. Damned exhibitionists... so sad.

  71. Unless you have 28 years of once daily entries.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    MySQL is really overkill for your work. My changelog uses a Perl script which parses my entries into XHTML. It even nicely preserves my double-spaced end-of-sentences (I really crave that whitespace...). I'm starting to see some slugishness from ext3 because I'm over 1,000 entries now, but I'm planning on hashing my entries into a subdir for the year. That'll limit it to 365 entries per directory (give or take a leap year :)), allowing ext3 to serve my needs for years to come.

    A good flat file system lets you reuse the VFS of Linux for smarter caching, and it's easy to NFS or SMB mount it via any machine on my private network. This also means that for someone to compromise my setup and mess with my changelog, they'd also have unrestricted access (pretty much) to my local network, meaning I'd have a whole lot more to worry about than losing my journal entries.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  72. Re: It's probably better than "webinar" by PurpleHigh · · Score: 1


    Webinar = web seminar (I think)

    Blog I can at least tolerate.

  73. Er, why not use HTML? by solostring · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Basically, blogs are just online diaries where people sprout off their random synapse charges... so why not just create it in html and upload it to a server.... I'm confused.

    1. Re:Er, why not use HTML? by luap2000 · · Score: 1

      ...to bring the power to the masses.

      while HTML is very easily learned, most people won't take the time.

    2. Re:Er, why not use HTML? by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 2

      Blogger-style apps take this:

      1) Edit mirrored web page to include new entry.
      2) Move older items to "archive pages"
      3) Connect to FTP server
      4) Upload new version of main page and modified archive pages. Upload new archive pages and set their permissions.
      5) Upload images.

      Into this:

      1) Edit post
      2) click "upload image" or similar button and browse to image
      3) Click "Submit"

      Blogger and pals also automatically create links to an entry that will work whether your post is on the main page or has moved to an archive page. Some provide a simple way to allow readers to comment.

      I could edit source code using pico, but an IDE makes the task a lot easier, comprende?

      --
      All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    3. Re:Er, why not use HTML? by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Because having a web-based way to post means you can do updates from anywhere you have internet access.

      Plus there are a lot of people who don't know HTML.

    4. Re:Er, why not use HTML? by ShannonClark · · Score: 1

      Additionally, there are many people who might indeed know HTML, but for the purpose of writing quick comments on a site they are looking at do not want to bother with FTP, edit, upload and manually updating links etc, just to add a note like "remember to check out this site..."

      I for one use the "Blogthis" bookmarklet a lot - very useful when I want to jot a few notes about a site.

      Since my current bookmarks file is over 1000 sites and growing, just adding a bookmark is rarely sufficient - now when I encounter a site that I am interested in I usually add an entry to my blog - takes a few seconds and then it is stored on a remote server.

      I also use the blogspot hosting features of Blogger - in large part to AVOID having to have FTP access set up on a remotely hosted service - someday soon I'll probably pay for Blogger Pro and the adfree blogspot hosting service.

      --
      -- Join us in Chicago May 1-4th for MeshForum -- writer, historian, tech geek, entrepreneur, internet junky since '91 --
  74. haha by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

    We usually try to avoid "Site X Hacked!" stories, but since this affects so many people - and, heh-heh, they don't have anywhere else to talk about it - here you go.

    You can tell he really enjoyed posting that. He enjoyed that way too much. I just see the smirk on his face.

    --


    We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  75. I AGREE WITH THIS POST. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    no, it's those sad people who clique together and generally agree on everything that the creator writes.

    I agree!

    All my friend on IRC agreed with me, except this Seth person who was being a dickhead again.

    I agree. God, what a fucker, that Seth!

    Ah well, at least I'm not wasting my time on stupid overhyped blogs.

    Definitely.

  76. Well... by Spencerian · · Score: 2

    This certainly just pisses ME off.

    (Why? See below.)

    I've been seriously considering a move to other ways to publish, with Moveable Type and Radio UserLand looking quite nice for support of images and the like (things I can't do from the free Blogger subscription). Now, it looks that I have a much bigger reason.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  77. What the hell...it's only karma... by Cutriss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mark me as troll if you want. I don't give a shit.

    90% of the posts in this thread are all "Holier Than Thou"-type Slashdot posts from fellow geeks that obviously feel some sort of insecurity about their own lives and are thus insulting those that use weblogs.

    I don't use a weblog to achieve an inflated sense of importance or to boost my ego. I use it to keep track of what my friends and I are doing. A year from now, we'll have all graduated college, and it's nice to be able to keep tabs on everyone's day-to-day events...and to continue to do so even when we've gone our separate ways.

    Just because you *think* the Internet is full of 12-year-old girlie bloggers discussing the drab details of their lives doesn't mean it's the truth. And even if it was, who appointed you "critic of all those lowly masses"? Get a life of your own, man...

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:What the hell...it's only karma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mark me as troll if you want. I don't give a shit.

      You see I was going to mod you up, but then I noticed you wrote that. Troll it is.

    2. Re:What the hell...it's only karma... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 3, Funny
      "...the Internet is full of 12-year-old girlie bloggers discussing the drab details of their lives..."

      Where?

      Where?

      That's just what I'm looking for!

      t_t_b

      --
      I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
    3. Re:What the hell...it's only karma... by syrinx · · Score: 2

      *thank you*. I wish I could mod you back up, you're already marked as troll. But you've hit the nail on the head with that post, and I wish more people would realise it.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    4. Re:What the hell...it's only karma... by retro128 · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with being elitist or "Holier than thou", it has to do with the fact that a) The name is dumb, and b) Most blogs ARE the product of 12-year-old girlie bloggers discussing the drab details of their lives. Does this mean that all blogs suck? No. In fact, your idea seems pretty cool. And hats off to you for referring to it as a "weblog". Blog just seems to have such a ... negative connotation.

      --
      -R
    5. Re:What the hell...it's only karma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit sticking up for yourself. It's annoying.

    6. Re:What the hell...it's only karma... by yoshiyah · · Score: 1

      The Software Development category of my blog is driven mostly by a small circle of colleagues at my company who want to gripe and complain about our jobs...! But it also gives us a URL to forward on to others we network with, when a common frustration comes up.

  78. Claiming Credit by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    I can just see the scriptkiddy and h4x0r IRC channels now:

    <me> I'm me!
    <7heR341M3> No, I am ME!
    <7he7ru3M3>No, you are both lying! I am ME!

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  79. Re:script kiddies are sickoes by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    Screw 'For Good Justice'

    I want 'For Good Revenge' ... Someone set us up the bomb!

  80. Whew. by limbostar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm the admin of diary-x. A few months ago, when I was setting up the server into its current configuration, I thought "I should have a mod_rewrite rule that redirects traffic from slashdot away, so that the hordes won't crush my poor server if I should ever get linked."

    I'm glad the rule actually works, I never had a chance to test it out :)

    I should change the message though, the "you look like you could use some sun" comment is probably a bit harsh.

    --
    this is a sig.
  81. In defense of Livejournal by Andy+Social · · Score: 1

    First, I have to agree that most weblogs and almost all Livejournals are complete and utter shit.

    However, the Livejournal community is similar to the BBS communities many of us old farts remember. The ability to search for someone in a centralized database of interests and geography is a way to find others of similar mindset, or an interesting mindset anyway.

    Coincidentally, I just wrote a short essay about how Livejournal differs from other "blogs" (I hate that word).

    A lot of LJ users know each other, or they set up meetings, much like our old BBS meetings. So, they're not writing for the general public, they're writing for their friends. If someone else finds them interesting enough to watch, good; if not, oh well.

    The demographics on LJ, though, are scary. The majority of the users are 15-year-old girls. That's a good indication of the writing to expect on any random journal. :-)

    --
    Illegitimi non carborundum
  82. enetation.co.uk by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

    Make your own homebrew script then use http://www.enetation.co.uk - its what I do. ;)

    1. Re:enetation.co.uk by haloscan · · Score: 1

      lol. A little shameless self-promotion Robert?

    2. Re:enetation.co.uk by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

      Nothing I said was untrue, check out roberttaylor.co.uk - my personal site using enetation ;)

    3. Re:enetation.co.uk by haloscan · · Score: 1

      Never said it wasn't true. Just said it was self-promotion based on the fact that you run enetation. :-)

  83. I figured it was a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had warned Blogger about this. I tried the service a little while back, and noticed that they seemed to use really shallow programming skills...particularly raw SQL strings to the database. Basically this is exactly what you need to do this attack (it may have been done another way).

    I actually don't want to say 'I told ya so,' but I can say that I'm glad I recommended that clients NOT use that service due to security deficiencies.

  84. down with 'blog' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you can't deny that the Blogger site has been playing a huge role in making people favor 'blog' over other, less annoying terms. To call all weblogs 'blogs' is to essentially advertise for Blogger. You won't see the word 'blog' on LiveJournal.

  85. Re:A bit mean. (oblig simpsons quote) by DjMd · · Score: 1

    what seperates us from the animals!

    "Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals!...
    except the weasels."


    --
    DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
  86. blogger back up by ntk · · Score: 5, Informative
    Blogger's status page was just updated (1150am-ish PST) to say this:

    We have found the cause of the vulnerability and have patched it. Everything is back restored and back online with the exception of the API server and bSTATS.

  87. I read at 0... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    I read at 0, because I don't want to miss anything. I'd rather read everything and do the filtering in my brain than to have other Slashdot readers do it.

    The whole moderation/karma system is silly anyway. }:)

  88. An article about webblogging without slashcode? by Traicovn · · Score: 2

    I'm almost appaled at the fact that there is an article about weblogging (ugh, that's like Kroger and their 'krogering'. I dislike that word) without a mention of Slashcode? Of course slashcode has more features and is trickier to use than most people who use blogger probably want to deal with. It's also more geared towards news and discussion sites of course, but I have noticed several /.-ers (CmdrTaco especially) in the past reccomend it whenever they mention weblogging

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  89. Re:For all you bloggers out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be too hard on yourself, i mean, to be stupid and fucking must be pretty darn tough. You should take a nap.

  90. hack vs. crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    around here, you'd think people would know the difference.

  91. There's some clever people with weblogs out there by Kingfox · · Score: 2

    C'mon, even JWZ has a LiveJournal...

  92. Negative comments about weblogs... by Aanallein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm seeing a lot of negative comments on weblogs out there, and (even though this is slashdot) I'm somewhat confused by them.
    Just because you personally don't find the content of the average weblog interesting, should this really mean weblogs don't have a reason for existing?

    Personally, I'm extremely grateful for weblogs, as they allow a lot more people to communicate, and for me to discover that communication, then would happen before.
    * I read the weblogs of my favorite authors, knowing as one of the first people in the world when they finish the next chapter, decide on a title of the book, but far mroe important, getting all sorts of interesting insights into the creation of the book, into the links to real world events and the reasons for why certain things are what they are - this heightens my appreciation of said books.
    * I read the weblogs of the key people working on developing the next version of my favorite software. A lot of Mozilla (to name one of /.'s favorites) developers for example have weblogs, and if you don't have time to read bonsai, these weblogs are often an easy but effective way to stay up to date on development. And it's more than just software. The weblogs from people in the various W3C working groups, the weblogs from the figureheads in various movements and organizations... All of them can provide fascinating insights into a world you'd otherwise never see anythign from but the end-result.
    * I read the weblogs of various friends and acquaintances I have scattered all over the world. Weblogs are to email what usenet is to mailinglists. Pull, rather than push. I get the information when I want it, adn it still allows me to keep in touch with people I'd otherwise not have time for. Sure, the stories about their cats and dogs are completely irrelevant to 99.999% of the people out there; why would this not be perfectly okay? It matters to them and to the people who matter to them. Nobody's forcing you to read these weblogs... And every now and then one of these people will have something very profound to say, or will have dug up a really interesting piece of information, or came up with a really good joke... And then other people link to that, often in other weblogs, and the information propagates. And that's good too.

    No matter how all of us might feel superior to the average 'blogger', no matter how all of us can whip up a solution that's both more convenient and technologically superior to this "Blogger" in a matter of hours... these are things that don't matter. It's the sharing of ideas, the communication, the links and bonds... that's what matters. Most of it is static, most of it will never be read by anyone. But all of these people maintaining weblogs are part of ... I don't know... of something big. Somethign big like 'the internet', but more efficient. The information is presented in a more coherent fashion. If you've read one weblog, you can easily grasp the way any other weblog works, and for the average person out there, a weblog is a way more efficient way to communicate than the personal homepage as it existed 5 years ago.

    After previewing I pulled almost all links from this comment - if you're really interested in the weblogs of the people I mentioned here, go and search for them...

  93. Use MT instead by jasontromm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you have your own journaling software installed, like MovableType, you don't have to worry about things like this!

    --
    "Politicians always tell the truth, when they're calling each other liars."
  94. The word `blog' on LJ? by Kingfox · · Score: 2

    Yeah, never...

  95. Get Rid of Michael by wdr1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    and, heh-heh, they don't have anywhere else to talk about it

    Taking glee in another site being hacked is pretty f'ing low.

    -Bill

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  96. LJ by British · · Score: 2

    The answer to your question is LiveJournal. I'd say about 90% of the userbase consists of 19 year old Ani Difranco/Tori Amos trendy bisexual drama queens trashing their ex-boyfriends and looking for sympathy. :)

    1. Re:LJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too funny. I was just reading a journal that fits your description. Her last post was an Ani Difranco song.

  97. On what do you base this assertion? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1, Troll
    You voice the opinion that this is an application-level hack, not related to the fact that blogger runs on IIS/5.0 and Windows 2000. You then proceed to place blame on the heads of application programmers, and draw Apache, PERL and PHP into your frame of reference, asserting them all vulnerable to "this sort of" attack.

    What foundation do you have for making these assertions and casting these aspersions? I've yet to see any indication one way or another that forensic analysis has been done on this attack. And considering the extremely well-documented security flaws of both IIS and Windows 2000, and the extreme ease that individuals have had in "owning" such boxes, I'd like to know why you automagically start pointing the finger elsewhere. Because, let's face it: even if it was an application error, Windows/IIS more than likely facilitated the attack and the bloody aftermath.

    Are applications and Apache/PERL/PHP vulnerable? Yes. As consistently the source of major security failures? No. Definitely not.

    1. Re:On what do you base this assertion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the extreme ease that individuals have had in "owning" such boxes"

      Go ahead and own this box if it's so easy... www.microsoft.com.

      Doh! Can't do it? Doh!

    2. Re:On what do you base this assertion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bunch of hot air using big words. You dance around his statements without touching it. Nice attempt at karma whoring, troll.

    3. Re:On what do you base this assertion? by roybentley · · Score: 1

      didn't this just happen about a week ago?

      *cough*

  98. Compendium of Blogger Alternatives by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 1



    Using any variety of tools one can find on the Weblogs Compendium ... and spending as little as $19.95 per YEAR with someone like Dixie Host you can avoid these headache, own your own data and have some control over your security situation.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  99. OMG SUBJECT LINE JOKES IVE NEVER SEEN THOSE BEFORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  100. Re: Inflated costs by redtail1 · · Score: 1
    For a more accurate look at typical web hosting costs, this is what I pay:
    $13/yr to register the domain
    + $80/yr for web hosting with 100MB storage, shell, PHP, MySQL, etc.
    -------
    $93/yr < $270/yr
    While I don't think much of LiveJournal, let's get the facts straight.
  101. Re:There's some clever people with weblogs out the by reallocate · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but judging by most posts here, the typical Slashdotter's cognitive abilities stagnated at about the same time that their social skills stopped developing, i.e., about age thirteen. If software doesn't let them play a game or turn their computer into the equivalent of a $75 boom box,they can't see the point. They wouldn't even know how to find, much less deal with, intelligent writing.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  102. Re: Inflated costs by MagPulse · · Score: 1

    Which provider do you use? $20/month gives me very reliable service with great tech support. I've wasted a lot of time with cheap web hosts.

  103. Dear Blog by krin · · Score: 1

    Today I killed a man, just to watch him bleed.

    --
    There is no spork.
  104. MOD PARENT POST UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some useful information her folks.

  105. Re:Paul Wellstone shot out of sky by Bush Admin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, AP is running the real article that about how the Liberal Dems are bemoaning the loss and crying out for a like minded replacement from Min so that they can continue their attacks on family values and the american pocketbook while marginalizing mainstream america in favor of gays and minorities. Liberals were in morning, not over the loss of the man, but the loss of the public face and their control over the liberal press and all the lies it tells the american people.

  106. Web Log? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No! Blog is an abbreviated form of 'Butt Log'!

    4:46 p.m.:

    I can't believe it took me this long to figure that out. *sigh* Man, I'm an idiot. *sigh* Oh well, hey, look, my ferret is sleeping. Maybe I'll wake him up. But he doesn't like that. Oh well, I think I'll watch Gladiator again instead.

  107. Re:Unless you have 28 years of once daily entries. by KewlPC · · Score: 1

    I agree. For many purposes, MySQL is just not worth the server load.

    People who don't have MySQL for one reason or another (don't want to bother setting it up, web host doesn't provide it, etc.) can check out BANG!, a lightweight news/weblog script.

  108. Some do. by CaptainEcchi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But not many.

    HTML is all I use. I've never thought it was that difficult; what's difficult about writing a little HTML and using FTP? (Of course, I started because I had a school webpage and didn't know how to fill it; a year later someone told me that was a blog). I have a PHP script for comments; though no permalinks or automatic archival or other nice features that don't matter that much to me. I do it this way because I'm a control freak, and I hate having to depend on other people for my blogging.

    But most people whose blogs I read don't go through all this trouble. Is it because they're not technically savvy? Some yes, but some of them run their own servers. These types are usually running MoveableType or B2, though, which run off one's own server/webhost, which gives you a large amount of control over what you do.

    So, I am as confused as you. Basically, I think it's just laziness--it's easier to have everything set up for you (or set it up first, if you're tech savvy and a bit of a control freak) and just type a little and push a button, then to type the HTML and upload the page every time.

    Of course, I've been writing HTML, and by hand, for so long now that I find it difficult to *not* type angle brackets, and have been known to put <p> tags by accident when typing papers or using a BBS, so maybe it's just me.

  109. most reliable may be worldlog.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Worldlog for a while and the site is NEVER down. It is dead simple but it's really what I'm looking for. Plus they're small enough that they will impliment a feature if you ask for it, look at the "Todo Box" on the site.

  110. Kerebos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May be the black hats got in via the latest Kerebos exploit?

    http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/10/25/103 55 04879271.html

  111. Re:Paul Wellstone shot out of sky by Bush Admin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 down, 5,999,999 to go.

  112. Give it a rest already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And everytime a story concerning blogs gets posted on Slashdot, some karma whore gets mad 'insightful' points for saying "I don't understand."

    It's like anything else on the Web; if you don't like it, go away. You don't have to "get" everything that passes you by, or editorialize about it either.

    That said, most livejournals are kept either by girls with low self-esteem wanting lonely guys to buy them stuff off their Amazon wish-lists, or people who write open letters to their friends and net.acquaintances because they're too busy or lazy to write personal emails to everyone individually. In other words, it's no big deal. In most cases, there's nothing to "get."

    And just like you don't give a fuck about their personal lives, I don't give a fuck about your feelings about reading about their personal lives. So now that we've established our respective ennui about one another's useless opinions, please put a sock in it.

  113. what you say!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we get signal.

  114. Pmachine by Fluxcore · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have your own hosting, and PHP/MySQL then I would suggest using Pmachine. Sets up in 10 minutes and easy as pie to use.

    --


    I would love to see things from your point of view. But I can't seem to get my head that far up my ass
  115. Some tips on installing MovableType by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 1


    I've helped more than one Blogger move to MovableType. The trick is, moving the darned files and directories around so its useful.

    Here's my supplement to the installation guide that anyone handy with SSH can use no sweat.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  116. b2 is great by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 2

    I'm in the process of setting up a political blog on SubIntSoc.net that uses b2. It's open source and totally customizable. The Cafelog forums contains scripts for dozens of cool hacks created by users.

    Ultimately, "blogging" software is usable for all sorts of purposes. Heck, people use Slashcode for blogging. A "blog" is just a threaded, sequenced posting and/or discussion program. Not all are about people's belly button lint, or whatever.

  117. Ugh... by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    What is all the fuss about?

    My blogger.com account seems fine - I just posted from it.

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  118. Tsk tsk tsk... Shoulda used MicroBlogger. by President+A.+Lincoln · · Score: 1



    And even now, people STILL don't believe me. MicroBlogger wouldn't have suffered from this sort of problem, gang. And never will.

    MicroBlogger -- You Don't Suck, So Why Should Your Blog?

    Cheers,
    Abe.

  119. Re: Inflated costs by redtail1 · · Score: 1

    NPS Internet Solutions. Except for one minor billing mixup which was partly my fault I have nothing but good things to say about them. Their e-mail support gets back to me the same day when I have a question. I haven't tried any other methods of support. $7.99/month for the web hosting I described and there's a deal to pay for one year and receive 12 months for the price of 10.

  120. Try Bloxsom... by dublin · · Score: 2

    I'm looking at using a weblog for process documentation purposes, and have looked at the usual suspects: Movable Type, Grey Matter, etc.

    But the one that really stands out so far as a great mix of power, simplicity, and a wonderfully non-intrusive license is Bloxsom. If you're looking for blog software, check it out.

    It's straight Perl (very small, simple, and streamlined) but offers the most important power features of the others.

    Even better, it fully leverages the underlying power of your OS, web server, or environment/tools - use and leverage whatever editors and text processing tools you like. All in all, a simple, powerful, and elegant solution in a world of bloated, complex, and overengineered alternatives.

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  121. back now by dirvish · · Score: 1

    It seems to be back up now.

  122. How ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    All these people on slashdot taking jabs at the "pitiful lives" of the bloggers, how they have "nothing better to do" etc. What about us? Not only do we apparently have nothing better than sit and read slashdot, but we ALSO apparently have nothing better to do but sit on /. and talk *about bloggers*. How pathetic is that? hehe

  123. Re: Slash clones by Denny · · Score: 1

    I wrote a Slash clone that doesn't require a dedicated server or root access. You can find it on freshmeat, project name is YAWNS.

    It doesn't do everything Slash does, but it covers the main stuff - articles, comments and weblogs. Polls are in development Right Now so will be in the next posted version, a few weeks at a guess. The biggest missing feature would be moderation I guess...

    There are a few other Slash clones out there too - several in PHP, and one or two in other languages. YAWNS is written in Perl, and has the singular distinction of actually producing standards compliant XHTML as output, something that Slash falls short on as do (as far as I'm aware) all the other clones.

    Regards,
    Denny

    --
    Police State UK - news and
  124. Re:Missing option: BLOG definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators, you suck. Why mod an informative, and funny post down? If you have something better to read, then moderate that one UP.

    UP YOURS,
    Sincerely me.

  125. you obviously don't look for good LiveJournals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are loads of technology blogs, not to mention RSS feeds (yes folks, Slashdot is syndicated on LiveJournal).

    There are diaries of home robot projects, students at MIT discussing projects, research scientists speculating on theories.

    Blogs are just another form of publishing.

    A crappy teenagers blog is just like a trashy romance novel, a crappy blog doesn't prove that all blogs are crap, just like a crap novel doesn't mean all books are crap.

    It's just publishing people!

  126. News? by osolemirnix · · Score: 2
    Not sure this is big news, or news that mattered.

    I think its news because of the way blogger.com works (it works pretty stupid IMHO). blogger.com is a centralized approach, you give it an FTP account and password to your web folder on your machine and it generates the HTML for you.

    This has the obvious advantage that simple web space will do for your, you don't need PHP MySQL, etc., all the code runs at blogger.com, it generates your (static) pages at its servers.

    The downside is that you have to give them an account and password which makes them very attractive to crackers (I'm surprised it took so long). That's why I would never use blogger. And that's why it's news I guess.

    --

    Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.