Slashdot Mirror


Most Powerful Computer in Canada - for a Day

An anonymous reader writes "On Nov. 4, 18 Canadian universities and will create the most powerful computer in Canada for a day to solve an important computational chemistry question in one day -- a task that would normally take six years to complete." Here is more information on the temporary supercomputer available at the project's home page and at UofG's News.

254 comments

  1. Westley Crusher by CatWrangler · · Score: 3, Funny
    On Nov. 4, 18 Canadian universities and will create the most powerful computer in Canada for a day.

    There goes Will Wheaton, showing off again. That bastard. I thought Picard got rid of that young twerp once and for all.

    --

    ---
    When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

    1. Re:Westley Crusher by bsharitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember when I owned the most powerful computer in Mongolia, but I eventually had to get rid of my Apple II.

  2. hmmmm by AvitarX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like they want to play DoomIII (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/03/15202 40&mode=nested&tid=127) alpha witha good frame rate.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    1. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't need that kind of machine to play DoomIII, I just need this.

    2. Re:hmmmm by Sex_On_The_Beach · · Score: 0

      Another pointless comment that doesn't a 4. Hey I just type funny shit all day on slashdot and I get good mods.. how lame is that???

      Unintelligent bullshit......

    3. Re:hmmmm by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --And what are the odds of somebody sneaking in the TiVo password crack, as well?
      .

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  3. new news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    news! canada is gona link some computers together to solve one complex problem. a totaly and unheard of idea. lets see how it works out

  4. "Most powerful computer in Canada" by mumblestheclown · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    • Most powerful computer in canada
    • World's tallest midget
    • Esquilax (the legendary esquilax, a horse with the head of a rabbit and the body of a rabbit)
    • Garfunkel and Oates
    • The world's third most famous belgian
    • deluxe english breakfast
    Museum of mediocrity!
    1. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah yes, good old-fashioned Canada bashing. It seems to be the American national sport these days doesn't it? Ever heard of Steven Cook (the guy who originated the concept of NP-completeness, FYI)? He's at the university of Toronto. Or how about Jack Edmonds (you've probably never heard of the Edmonds-Karp algorithm either). He's at University of Waterloo. I could go on, but why waste my breath. Granted, Canadians are waaay too smug about not being American, but fools like you give them a reason to be.

    2. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How can one be *too* smug about being non-American? Seems to me that not being American in my home town, is more important than being Canadian.

    3. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by _mt99 · · Score: 0

      Oh, and the Belgians invented mayonaise. Don't mess with that.

    4. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      I'm an American, but I don't get why do we bash our northern neighbors.

      The first time I really heard Canadian bashing was in South Park. But where does the bashing originate from and why?

    5. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by thirty-seven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The stuff on South Park isn't real Canada bashing. Often it is in fact making fun of Americans' Canada bashing. In the case of the South Park Movie and its song "Blame Canada", it is mocking the tendency of parents to blame the bad behaviour of their children on anything and everything but themselves - even on something as obviously harmless (from an American's point of view) as Canada.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    6. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, Canadians are waaay too smug about not being American, but fools like you give them a reason to be.


      Well...hey...I like to occasionally rib the Canadians, but it's all in pretty good fun. Not serious...not bashing. I disagree on a few political points up there, but overall most Canadians are good people that I am pretty glad to have as neighbors.

      Besides...on Slashdot, it's waaaay more fashionable to bust on America. :)

    7. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an American living in Canada, I find it very surprising to see the pent up anger that a several Canadians seem to have for Americans. This post seems to bring out that sentiment that I see on a daily basis. Most Americans are ignorant to the anti-American sentiment that exudes from the Canadian media and the general population.

      The crack made that fired this guy off isn't exactly what I call Canada bashing. It's our brand of humor we like to call sarcasm.

      Why is it that a faction of the population seems to dislike the US so much?
      Americans don't create beer commercials that express an annoyance or hatred for Canadians. (Molson) We don't produce shows that attempt to depict the American population as ignorant fools. (Talking to Americans)

      Most Americans love Canadian culture. We love Canadian sports. We love Canadian comedians and entertainers. I don't know why there seems to be a hatred that isn't reciprocated.

      Having seen both sides of the coin, I'd have to say that America bashing is far more prevalent and mainstream here in Canada. (Per capita of course)

    8. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Actually, you're wrong. The movie was ironic, but in a tongue-in-cheek way. When they sang, "Blame Canada," you'd better believe they fucking well meant it.

      HHOS.

      --

      I write in my journal
    9. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by RestiffBard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hey, no canada bashing here.

      mad props to Canada. all the time.

      we kid because we love.

      I mean really Canada is just about the only place on Earth an American can visit without fear of being blown up, kidnapped, or er.. blown up.

      lived in Canada for a month. best people on Earth. talk funny though. and you folks do say "eh" alot. don't deny it. you do. I heard "eh" roughly 40 times in one 10 minute conversation.

      it just sounds funny. love you anyway.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    10. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by sympleko · · Score: 1

      The first time I really heard Canadian bashing was in South Park.

      Check out Canadian Bacon , a Michael ( Roger & Me ) Moore flick with Alan Alda and John Candy. The U.S. in the wake of cold war has no one left to hate so under pressure from the military-industrial complex the government turns to the North for a convenient enemy. Includes such gems as the President (Alda) shouting "Surrender pronto, or we'll level Toronto!" and a Canadian highway cop busting two Americans for spraying anti-Canadian graffiti on a truck -- in only one language.


      The first time I really heard Canadian bashing was in South Park. But where does the bashing originate from and why?


      I think you might need a history degree to answer that one well. Here's my take (Full Disclosure: IANA historian. I am an American married to a Québécoise and I once read a book called "Canadian History for Dummies"): The US and Canada are pretty much cousins. In the mid 18th century, the English had their colonies and the French had Canada. The French and Indian War (I think they call it the Seven Years' War up there) concluded in 1763 and resulted in the French pretty much out of North America and the English in control from Georgia to Québec. To pay for this massive expense, Parliament raised taxes on the colonies.

      Americans know the next part of the story. The colonists were pissed that they had to pay such huge taxes and had no voice in Parliament itself. Things escalated, yadda yadda yadda, 13 colonies declared independence. The fathers of the American revolution pretty much expected that Canada would follow their lead and join the US. That is probably the first example of the US expecting Canada to do whatever is in the best interests of the US. But they didn't. And so many battles of the Revolution were fought on the Canadian frontier because that part of North America was under British control.

      The same thing happened in the war of 1812 (I forget what the Canadians call that one). The US declared war on Britain and invaded the nearest British soil, namely Canada. This one didn't work out too well for the Americans. The British army burned Washington. Many Canadians feel that they won that war, but the States got one thing they really wanted: street cred. In the treaty they signed, the British had to acknowledge the existence of an independent USA.

      Nowadays, Canada and the US are great friends and allies. But they are like cousins with a big rivalry. To my mind Canada is what the US may have been if they had never declared independence. Mercantilism as a theory is crap, and Britain eventually realized it and allowed their colonies to govern themselves. The same would have happened here. But the American psyche depends a lot on fighting for independence, and I think the Canadian one depends a lot on cooler, smarter resolution of problems. Although they look and talk (mostly) just like us, their national philosophy is a lot closer to Britain and Europe, and so the more you learn about the guys across the border, the more interesting they become.

      American bashing of Canada thus has historical roots, but I think it's more ignorance or indifference now. In school we (Americans) learn very little about Canada and are led to believe that it doesn't matter (heck, even our weather maps could be used to draw the conclusion that beyond Maine and Michigan lies the North Pole). Canadians deeply resent being treated as just like the States or, worse, ignored. Americans have a superiority complex, whereas Canadians have an inferiority complex.

      Now I'm sure that that is FMTYWTK, and probably Offtopic, but I hope at least Interesting. Let us all join together as brothers and sisters and sing the NAFTA anthem!

    11. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, thanks for the history lesson. Things seem a bit clearer now :)

    12. Re:"Most powerful computer in Canada" by the_skuncle · · Score: 1

      Ahh, my southern neighbour...

      We call the war of 1812 the war of 1812.

      Your essay on American/Canadian relations was very enlightening if not complete. We take a perverse pleasure in bashing our southern cousins too. We are so damned smug about our righteousness in all matters both great and small that we will couch our own ignorance in silly little anti-american jokes just to try to justify the idea that our "unique" Canadian culture is something both special and new in the world. It's not.

      Our kids are able to travel freely in the world, throwing their chocolate wrappers and soda cans in the streets and pissing on the monuments of their host countrys, knowing that as long as they have a Canadian flag sewn onto their backpack they are safe from the dangers imposed upon our American brothers and sisters.

      In Canada we wear Nike shoes, made by slave labour; we use computer parts made by slave labour; almost all of our wealth and privlege comes from slave labour. Same as in America.

      The reason behind this self-immolation? So that perhaps the smug bastards on both sides of the 49th will give their stupid, ignorant heads a shake and see what our arrogance is doing to the rest of the world.

      - Skuncle being grumpy.

  5. Dup by HRbnjR · · Score: 3, Informative

    This story is a Duplicate

    1. Re:Dup by Lshmael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the project starts tomorrow, and this story has two completely different links (including one to the official site which has a FAQ with answers to what people posted on Slashdot), no, it is not a duplicate. A followup, perhaps.

    2. Re:Dup by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 4, Funny

      quick, everyone go to the original article and post the highly moderated posts as your own in this one!

  6. Beer Cooled Supercomputer by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    On Nov. 4, 18 Canadian universities and will create the most powerful computer in Canada for a day to solve an important computational chemistry question in one day

    Coincidentally, on Nov 4, Canadian Universities will create the world's first beer-cooled supercomputer, "Drunk Blue".

    When asked why beer, the researchers involved explained that it was both plentiful and "what else would you use Blue for?".

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Beer Cooled Supercomputer by EverStoned · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be the first... Damn, can't find the link...but It's been done.

    2. Re:Beer Cooled Supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. Cool link. I'll one-up it: Bill Gates is the source

  7. Repeat... by jacobjyu · · Score: 0, Redundant

    find it also here

  8. The first test has commenced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it survive with the Slashdot effect?

    1. Re:The first test has commenced... by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 1

      The initial test of their super-computer has already started. Within an hour, it'll be a full load test.

    2. Re:The first test has commenced... by loconet · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can view the /. effect live by refreshing the main page and looking at the counter. Look at those numbers gooo!

      --
      [alk]
    3. Re:The first test has commenced... by jukal · · Score: 2
      Can it survive with the Slashdot effect?

      Well, it seems the slashdot effect comes in many flavors. In this case it might a pretty forceful one, as the subject matter is probably of interest to many. Here is an analysis of data gathered from another case - which was quite easy to handle actually.

    4. Re:The first test has commenced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One request per second maybe? Big deal.

    5. Re:The first test has commenced... by fciron · · Score: 1

      At 9:07 EST they claim to be victims of /. effect. I hope it's just the server.

    6. Re:The first test has commenced... by fciron · · Score: 1

      9:15 the site is up again. Needs a better logo.

  9. hey wait a sec! by MoceanWorker · · Score: 5, Funny

    imagine a beowulf clu... err.. wait.. dammit..

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    1. Re:hey wait a sec! by pVoid · · Score: 1

      no imagining needed: Beowulf...

    2. Re:hey wait a sec! by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "imagine a beowulf clu... err.. wait.. dammit.."

      Damn, someone beat me to it. I guess I'll just have to go with:

      All your computers are belong to Canada.

      But that's just so last year...

    3. Re:hey wait a sec! by His+Excellency · · Score: 1

      It's a trap!

    4. Re:hey wait a sec! by anshil · · Score: 1

      You got the grammar too right, the original japanese game had not base in plural, but in singular.

      It should rather be:

      All your computer are belong to Canada.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  10. ChemEx(TM) by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    For when you absolutely, positively need that chemistry problem solved by the next day.

    1. Re:ChemEx(TM) by purduephotog · · Score: 2

      Sad thing is, I know people that have been told that. Heh. 64 nodes that take 3 months to make 1 calculation....... unbelievable (and these are no slowpokes, 1ghz, 1.6ghz chips)......

    2. Re:ChemEx(TM) by Geek_in_Marketing · · Score: 1

      I have to ask - whatever the most important question may be - won't the answer be '42'?

      --

      "This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
  11. Shopulda built it first. by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    They should have built it before they announced it. That way, maybe they could survive the low-grade Sunday Slashdotting.

  12. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    >>18 Canadian universities and will create

    If the anonymous submitter happens to be from one of the 18 universities, I don't have much hope for this.

    Unless they're trying to analyze the sentence structure of All Your Base.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If the anonymous submitter happens to be from one of the 18 universities, I don't have much hope for this."

      I'm from one of these universities (the UofG linked in the original post, to be specific) and I normally post as a non-AC. It's interesting that they mention the CIS people (Stacey and Morton) but don't mention any chem people. I was actually in Morton's class last semester and he's a pretty cool guy. (He describes himself as "oldschool" .)

      And yes, this is a duplicate story.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no surprise coming from a canadian university professor...

  13. Edmonton Controller by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is cool...the Edmonton Controller appears to be hovering over Hudson's Bay.

    It's not only Canada's most powerful supercomputer, it's the only one controlled from space.

    1. Re:Edmonton Controller by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Actually.. and I'm surprised you don't know this...

      It's running out of a former military base UNDERNEATH hudsons bay... the entrance of the 500 mile tunnel to the base is somewhere in the canadian shield.

      Strange that they let some university types in there...

    2. Re:Edmonton Controller by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      We also have secret army bases underneath the rockies. We've been preparing to take the world over for some time.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  14. As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by jukal · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Why didn't they just make a client program for distributed computing so the entire country/world could help out?" (From a Slashdot posting.)

    First, we had to keep CISS-1 simple enough for us to manage. Second, the computational chemistry application has significant resource requirements (e.g., large memory, significant disk space, etc.). Third, we are not interested in "cycle stealing" for CISS-1; the machines that we use will be dedicated to the task at hand. The rest of the FAQ is here.

    *** and now to the commercials, for the final time, here is an analysis of the Slashdot effect.

    1. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      Probably for security.. The largest and longest running projects such as SETI have had to deal with CHEATING and haking of thier work units.. By keeping it in house and running mosting on HIGH end trusted systems they can still get the job done for less money and quickly.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    2. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by jukal · · Score: 3, Informative
      Because of the complexity of the molecules, the energy needs to be calculated at many thousand points. Each point may require several hours of computing time on a modern workstation. In computational terms, this is an ideal parallel problem which can be distributed onto as many processors as points needed and is therefore ideally suited for the CISS Experiment

      Yes, security (and data/result integrity) is probably one of the main reasons why they want it to be run in a trusted enviroment. Otherwise it seems that this would be a good case for a massively distributed solution (although apparently the application required big amounts of memory, and maybe bandwidth). But the dataintegrity in non-trusted network probably makes it impossible. I don't know if anyone has come up with a good solution to overcome the dataintegrity problems - other than performing occasional checks (running the same task on multiple machines) to find the forged results. In a non-trusted environment, you might soon find a big percent of the cpu cycles used just for dataintegrity checks.

    3. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      Thats why I mentioned SETI.. Some teams are taking 99% completed units then copying them to other team members to complete.. SETI currently does integrity checks by having the same unit calculated several times then taking the most common result.. If someone takes a flawed result at 99% then everyone on that team finnishes it they flawed result will be the accepted answer.. Integrity in a competitive open environment will be one of the biggest problems for any future open projects..

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    4. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by jukal · · Score: 5, Informative
      SETI currently does integrity checks by having the same unit calculated several times then taking the most common result..

      Yes, and imagine the case of the distributed crypto-crack efforts such as those run by distributed.net and by us too for the rc5-56 challenge (the cyberian.org effort). Imagine, that someone fakes the results for just the keyspace, which contained the correct key - and that this forged result passes the controls. Now, as result the progress counter might reach 100% and you still did not find the correct key. The only solution would be to calculate the whole keyspace again. I mean, even if you check the integrity - calculate same task for 10 times for example - still, it is possible that the forge gets through. Ofcourse, there is a number of counter actions to make the forging harder but still, I think the key problem is still unanswered. Or, if someone has some good fresh pointers about this subject, please post them here :)

    5. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      There's one pretty effective counter for this already in place: if your computer finds the correct key, you get a decently-sized bundle of cold, hard cash. Most people, at least, would prefer to have that money than screw up the contest.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    6. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by jukal · · Score: 2
      There's one pretty effective counter for this already in place: if your computer finds the correct key, you get a decently-sized bundle of cold, hard cash. Most people, at least, would prefer to have that money than screw up the contest.

      Yes, but if the chances of winning that piece of cash gets close to the same as winning in national lotto, then there will be a significant number of nerds who value more higher the probability of getting their name shown in prime time (in a top position in the statistics) by cheating.

    7. Re:As this will asked anyway, from the FAQ by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Oh, good point. I was thinking along the lines of intentionally trying to screw up the contest, rather than trying to get a high score and screwing up the contest as a side effect.

      Still, the money is a good deterrent. But I agree with you that it's not going to be enough in all cases with people who want to inflate their scores.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  15. involving more computers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not just send out the problem to thousands of more machines nationwide via UD.com?

    just a thought..

  16. In Other News... by Quaoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Canada is clustering all of their fishing ships to create the most powerful Canadian navy yet.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:In Other News... by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

      Old news...where do you think our current Naval vessels come from?

    2. Re:In Other News... by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Informative

      While it's fun to joke about Canada, it should be noted that when it's actually needed (i.e. not against a bunch of two bit little shithole nations, or just to continue to push a military-export policy) Canada quickly becomes a military powerhouse.

      "The Canadian Navy began the Second World War with half a dozen vessels and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian Soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the War with the World's 3rd largest Navy and the fourth largest Air Force. The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had in previous times.......In film, Hollywood abandoned the notion of a separate Canadian identity"

    3. Re:In Other News... by kaladorn · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      With all due respect, and I'm a Canadian and I have served in our nation's armed forces, I think this is past tense. The logic of keeping piles of generals handy to suddenly recruit and train a whack of soldiers is kind of broken, given the nature of modern conflicts.

      I *wish* we could actually help out some of the places that really need help right now. But we can't even keep a thousand guys in Afghanistan for a year, let alone buy those guys some appropriate camouflage fatigues in a timely fashion. And don't get me started on the Sea King or its replacements....

      For a country with some of the best individual soldiers in the world, we've been treating our military like absolute crap for far too long for it not to show :(

      But I guess that's okay as long as our PM gets his new jets.... @@!%%$!!

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    4. Re:In Other News... by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With all due respect, and I'm a Canadian and I have served in our nation's armed forces, I think this is past tense. The logic of keeping piles of generals handy to suddenly recruit and train a whack of soldiers is kind of broken, given the nature of modern conflicts.

      Not sure if I agree with that. Real conflict still generally build up over time. Even for the Iraq situation the US took quite a few months (a year?) to build up its forces surrounding Iraq before it began the offensive.

      The constant criticism of the Canadian military, and calls for multi-billion dollar budget increases, might have some of its roots in the arms industry- An industry that wants to make us believe that we need loads of high tech equipment to sit rotting in warehouses, ready for multi-billion dollar upgrades 5 years down the road. Military equipment comes at a cost to social programs, healthcare, etc, or alternately higher taxes. Our individual soldiers are paid quite well (I was surprized when a friend recently joined to see the pay rates), have fantastic personal equipment and good bases.

      While we hear constant cries about the "dangerous new world", the reality is that the classic militarism of yesteryear is a bygone thing: The US has nominated itself, and achieved by default, global policeman. Though this role is costly to her, it was a self-pursued role, and comes with a healthy bonus of being able to promote and pursue her own self-interests. Of course, simpleton morons like Pat Buchanan would try to cast such a role not as a self-serving role, but as a role which we should all send a cheque in the mail.

      I *wish* we could actually help out some of the places that really need help right now. But we can't even keep a thousand guys in Afghanistan for a year, let alone buy those guys some appropriate camouflage fatigues in a timely fashion. And don't get me started on the Sea King or its replacements....

      I think the camouflage issue was more of a political red herring: There isn't an armed forces on the planet, except perhaps the US, that has camo for every possible battlefield situation. The Afghan conflict came up just as a prior batch was destroyed and the new batch was on order. It happens. Personally I think, given the nature of the military, that some of the elite teams showed true military gumption and they quite literally made their own, creating some of the best camo possible. The Sea King is indeed an unfortunate reality, but again compared with the acquisition of a fleet of modern subs, missile frigates, and cormorant helicopters, it's amazing how much attention the Sea King garners. Again, take a close look at the $ vested interests who are looking at lining up at the trough.

      We are a relatively small country, and the simple reality is that our military will always pale aside the US', just as the military of every other NATO countries does. I'm perfectly fine with that. We went into Afghanistan with troops that were perfect for the non-conventional modern warfare (i.e. snipers), did a great job, and got out after the situation had pretty much settled. Actually the causative factor for us leaving Afghanistan was probably the death of 4 soldiers by friendly fire: Given that the conflict was pretty much resolved, such a needless loss couldn't be repeated.

    5. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Liberal socialist ways..."

      Your medicare: $10 in fees
      Our medicare: $1 in taxes.

    6. Re:In Other News... by CyberBry · · Score: 1

      The Homer Simpsons of the air?

      Then why did Canadian CF-18 pilots beat out their american and british counterparts in the 1998 Top Gun competition in the states?

      --

      ----
      Bryan Samis
      http://www.thesamis.net
    7. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no disrespect for the Canadian military and it's people. I recall some stories about a Canadian sniper team that was deployed with Americans in Afghanistan...and they were well liked and respected by the Americans. Canada's military has some good people...but Canada as a country has really cut it's military down to so little. There are large cities with larger police forces than all of Canada's Army, Navy, and Airforce put together...and that is kinda sad. Follow the money trail and you'll find that the relatively high taxes weren't the only cost for the social programs...the ones the good doctors keep coming to the U.S. for the money...

      I don't want to come off like I am bashing Canada for saying it...I just disagree with some of their politics. That aside - most of the Canadians I've known were pretty good folks.

    8. Re:In Other News... by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

      Going from winning combat exercises to transporting troops halfway around the world, sustaining them, and protecting these soldiers by land sea and air is quite a stretch.

      And as a previous poster mentioned, we can't even provide our soldiers proper desert camouflage.

    9. Re:In Other News... by Glytch · · Score: 2

      We Canadians do appear to neglect our military, but look at it this way. The only country we border is the US, which is a tad unlikely to invade us. Any other country would have to cross one of three oceans. A lot of us are just not worried about military matters. The national budget reflects this. We've got more important things to fund.

      Also, our taxes are no higher than US taxes. What's wrong with social programs? I know I'd rather see my tax dollars go towards someone's chemotherapy or student loan instead of defence industry kickbacks.

      On the bright side, the underequipped nature of the military can lead to humourous advertising campaigns, such as Greco Pizza's "More Subs Than The Canadian Navy!" tagline.

    10. Re:In Other News... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      It should also be noted, that Canada cannot have nuclear reactors. All of their ships are diesels. Good for coastal defense, but not for a extended campaign miles away.

      We cannot have nuclear reactors? Huh? Nuclear reactors on weapons of war are, apart from being tremendously dangerous, enormously expensive. Secondly, the vast majority of the US fleet is diesel powered, apart from some aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines. For the rest of the world only Russia uses nuclear power outside of submarines, with France giving it a try on one of their micro aircraft carriers. Perhaps you believe that aircraft carriers just go roving around the oceans on their own and aren't basically tethered to the battle fleet that goes with them?

      Canada sucks as a military power.

      Completely and absolutely true. We're not a military power. We're a country of 30 million with a focus on social programs, in a world that is completely dominated by the machinations that built a massive military complex during the cold war, and now will use every device to maintain it. At the same time the honest truth is that we're perfectly happy being in the United State's shadow, so while France and England and Germany busily produce their next attempt to provide a European equal to US power, we'll happily let our fighters rust into oblivion. Despite 9/11, the world is a vastly safer place with far fewer tyrants and far fewer threats that aircraft carriers and fighter jets can conquer. A terrorist with some biological agents doesn't care if you have a vast army of M1A2s.

      Their airforce is also just as crappy as their navy... when conducting joint excercises with the US and British, the canadians are usually given "busy time" excercises.

      Sure.... that's why Canadian pilots win virtually every competition they're entered into (like our snipers). Of course we do have a pretty limited air power: Maybe 100 F18s, and that's it as far as front line fighters. Air power is tremendously expensive, and we long realized that the US will outmatch us dramatically regardless (just like it outmatches any other nation. Your British comments are especially telling because, apart from Tony Blair's US pandering, Britain most certainly is not a supreme power alongside the US. Indeed, all of Europe together is but a token gesture compared to the US arsenal).

    11. Re:In Other News... by Norman+Lorrain · · Score: 1

      Did you know that there are more cops in New York City than there are soldiers in the Canadian Armed Forces?

      Puts it in perspective, doesn't it?

      We're just not in the same league. Better to concentrate on special forces and elite troops.

    12. Re:In Other News... by Akoman · · Score: 1

      The Sea King isn't just some kind of play for attention. There is a serious problem with that aging fleet of helicopters, not for military readiness, but for our Search and Rescue capabilities. How can we expect men and women to go and rescue people in possibly the worst conditions available if we aren't willing to provide them with the best equipment available?

      Replacing the Sea King is a must if we want to be able to save human lives.

    13. Re:In Other News... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and we are already taking delivery of Cormorant S&R helicopters (though I believe those are intended to replace the Labrador).

      I have no doubt that there is a need for a well equipped military (especially if the equipment itself endangers the servicepeople), however it's a classic situation where "how much is enough?" is a completely subjective measure where everyone will fervently and passionately proclaim their point of view. Generals will argue that the military needs to be bigger, faster, larger (if necessary they'll distort perceived enemies. See the cold war and the massive US buildup against a Soviet threat that later was found not to exist). This is similar to how if you put the police in charge of the police budget, every citizen would have their own personally assigned police officer, and all police officers would walk around in giant personal robots.

    14. Re:In Other News... by MrEd · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir. The most lucid post I've seen all night.

      --

      Wah!

    15. Re:In Other News... by ErikZ · · Score: 2


      The biggest problem with social programs is that you can't cut them and shunt the money over to military applications when you need to. Too many people are depending on those social programs.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    16. Re:In Other News... by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

      the gulf war started I believe in august when saddam entered kuwait. desert shield started almost immediately, desert storm was a couple of weeks in january.

      I do believe that the gulf war has to go down in the history books as one of the most quickly resolved major conflicts in history (not I said major conflicts, I'm sure there are tons of conflicts that were settled in a day)

      as for canucks, in my house we make fun all the time of the canadian military and their tank but I never fail to remember that in every conflict the US has played a part the canadians were right there with us.

      also, there were movies made about canada's part in ww2 I've seen them.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    17. Re:In Other News... by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Canada quickly becomes a military powerhouse.


      Be Afraid... Be Very Afraid... Eh.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:In Other News... by Jock+Kodimar · · Score: 0

      Plus we'd bomb the living piss out of anybody that tries to mess with our brothers to the north anyway. Besides who would make our robotic space arms if we lost canada?

    19. Re:In Other News... by 0xA · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine graduated from the Royal Millitary College last year. Last time I spoke to him on hte phone I asked what he was going to be doing now.

      He said, "Sea Kings".

      I said, "You're Brave."

      he said, "Everybody says that."

      Just thought that was kind of funny.

    20. Re:In Other News... by trotski · · Score: 1

      Wow, really? Did you know that there are more cops in the city of Toronto than there are in the Canadian Armed Forces????

      Better yet, did you know that there are more cops in the entirity of the United States then there are in the entire US military.

      My point is, your argument is bullshit. Of coruse there are more cops in the city of new york... there's 20 million people in New York for gods sakes! This puts nothing in perspective. Unless you have a war or something you'll always have more cops than police officers!

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    21. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I used in to be an officer in the Army. Life as an officer is quite fun, but well-paid? I remember i was making $23K as a 2nd LT, and that was with a degree from a very well-regarded school.

      Most of my enlisted soldiers that had families qualified for food stamps. In addition, they lived in houses that were in desparate need of repair and were treated with medical practices that would generally invoke malpractice suits in the civilian sector. All this for a life where you spend most of your life away from your family in some god-forsaken country to persue some foreign policy that you really don't care about. But for the most part they don't complain about a lifestyle that starts at 4:45 in morning and doesn't end until 7:00 at night.

      People seem to forget that the last people that want to go to war are soliders, because they are actually the ones whose lives are affected.

      I'm not a big fan of expensive weapon expenditures and expensive weapons research designed for a cold-war era. I think operations tempo is too high as well.

      In my personal opinion, we reduce new weapons expenditure and procurement by about 50%. In addition, reactivation of two infantry divisions, conversion of one regular infantry division to full operational funding, renovation of enlisted housing, and more training for personnel.

      But then again, why do I bother posting this. Everyone here seems to be a conspiracy theorist. :-)

    22. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless you have a war or something you'll always have more cops than police officers!

      The only question is, how will we tell the difference?

    23. Re:In Other News... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      also, there were movies made about canada's part in ww2 I've seen them.

      Really? What were they aboot, eh?

    24. Re:In Other News... by kurokaze · · Score: 1

      Last I checked we had 52 operational fighters
      left.

    25. Re:In Other News... by RobinH · · Score: 2

      Did you know that there are more cops in New York City than there are soldiers in the Canadian Armed Forces?

      Did you know there's approximately similar numbers of people in New York City and in Canada? (that is, somewhere in the 25 million to 30 million range). Doesn't it say more about the safety of New York City if you need an 'army' of cops to police it?

      When Bush was campaigning against health care in the U.S., he loved to say that there were more MRI's in New York than in Canada. Was he really making any point, if there are more people in New York State than in Canada? Even if he meant New York City, you can't compare an urban environment to an entire country, both rural and urban.

      How's that for perspective, buddy?

      However, I agree with your last point, that in future conflicts, brute force should take a back seat to surgical strike type operations and elite forces.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    26. Re:In Other News... by CyberBry · · Score: 1

      I understand that, but my issue is, why should we have to? When was the last time the Canadian Armed Forces "seriously" deployed into combat overseas? I'd say either WWII or the Gulf. In both cases, the Canadian army/navy/airforce was able to, in most cases, perform at least as well as their collegues, if not better. Now, my point is this. Almost every deployment of Canadian troops in the last few years has been US led operations, nothing that the government of Canada would have gone in alone on. So then, if the Canadian armed forces, on their own, have no reason to be overseas, then why should we spend money developing the ability to keep them there? If there was a major war, ala WWII, the country would ramp up, and this capability would be developed.

      I recently read a Pat Buchanon article that basically called Canada a leach that sucks US defense dollars, for having to use American transport planes for overseas deployments to Afghanistan, then use American helicopters once we were there, etc. Let me point something out. If not for the united states, our troops would not have BEEN in Afghanistan. We were there to help you and support you in YOUR war, and we even have 4 caskets to prove it.

      I used to share the view that Canada should develop its military heavy lift capabilities, but now I'm not so sure. Why should we waste so much money simply to help out an ungrateful ally?

      --

      ----
      Bryan Samis
      http://www.thesamis.net
    27. Re:In Other News... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with social programs is that you can't cut them and shunt the money over to military applications when you need to.

      Obviously no-one's told GWB this.

      Gr

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    28. Re:In Other News... by kaladorn · · Score: 2

      Not sure if I agree with that. Real conflict still generally build up over time. Even for the Iraq situation the US took quite a few months (a year?) to build up its forces surrounding Iraq before it began the offensive.

      I'm curious what background you speak from....

      I ask because it takes more than having a pile of brasshats in Ottawa at NDHQ to make us ready to deploy a worthwhile force. Failing procurement and training programs ensure that our vehicles are worn out (Sea King, Leopard, Iltis, F-18) and that our troops don't spend enough time training in primary skills. THESE losses alone are enough to say that six months is not enough lead time to deal with the situation (pardon me for being annoyed, but we had MONTHS to wind up for Afghanistan too and we couldn't even get the right camouflage.... so don't expect me to believe we can mass mobilize or even moderately mobilize in any useful way in short order given our current state of affairs).

      The constant criticism of the Canadian military, and calls for multi-billion dollar budget increases, might have some of its roots in the arms industry-

      Or from anyone who comprehends how hobbled our military now is. Or from anyone who comprehends the role of an active and sufficient military in maintaining foreign policy impact.

      An industry that wants to make us believe that we need loads of high tech equipment to sit rotting in warehouses, ready for multi-billion dollar upgrades 5 years down the road.

      As opposed to those who think that our guys regularly being killed by bad equipment (specifically of the flying or not really variety) is acceptable? I'm not talking about billions of dollars of stockpiled cruise missiles. I'm talking about subs that don't leak, rescue and military choppers that don't fall out of the sky from metal fatigue, camouflage of the right colour, night vision gear in appropriate volumes, vaccines that aren't tainted for the troops, enough logistics capacity to deploy to trouble spots even one battalion and supporting elements and maintain them there, etcetera etcetera. No wazoo high tech anywehre in sight.

      Military equipment comes at a cost to social programs, healthcare, etc, or alternately higher taxes. Our individual soldiers are paid quite well (I was surprized when a friend recently joined to see the pay rates), have fantastic personal equipment and good bases.

      Yeah, right. And can't be deployed to a trouble spot without sticking out there thumbs.... and can't stay there long without foreign logistics support... and can't stay there as a force because of a lack of combat soldiers.... and can't keep the subs at sea because they are falling apart... and can't keep the planes and choppers in the air due to fatigue and age of the airframes.....

      I think the camouflage issue was more of a political red herring: There isn't an armed forces on the planet, except perhaps the US, that has camo for every possible battlefield situation.

      Possibly true.

      The Afghan conflict came up just as a prior batch was destroyed and the new batch was on order. It happens.

      No, they had plenty of warning they were going. They had yet to procure the batch of desert camo (which arrived AFTER their return more than six months later). They asked the US "Could you provide us with enough camo?". The US said "send us the sizes, we'll ship you what you need in 7-10 days for the same cost or less than what you'd pay for the homegrown stuff". Guess what? We didn't care enough for our soldiers to spend the money. What was the official reason from NDHQ? Morale problems caused by wearing foreign uniforms.

      Let me say that again: Morale problems. BS! BS! BS! Every infanteer I've talked to (and it has been quite a few) has said "if it made me harder to see or be seen or maybe be hit, I'd gladly take camo from anyone...".

      Personally I think, given the nature of the military, that some of the elite teams showed true military gumption and they quite literally made their own, creating some of the best camo possible.

      A further example of your lack of clear thought. They effectively (by using paint) damaged their existing uniforms (in green) if I'm not sorely mistaken. So the net effect is that we're down some green uniforms, which we have to replace anyway, and our troops didn't enjoy the benefit of having real camouflage but had to build their own (PS - all infanteers generally add their own camouflage anyway.... that isn't an *elite* decision....). So our net financial benefit? Nil. And maybe it would have helped keep some of our troops a bit safer if we'd got them desert camouflage a bit earlier.

      Our troops coped. That's because they are good. Our troops coped up until the point where our overstretched forces couldn't support them and they needed to rotate home to get a rest. Then they didn't cope and we bailed out. It isn't the troops I blame for that.

      The Sea King is indeed an unfortunate reality, but again compared with the acquisition of a fleet of modern subs, missile frigates, and cormorant helicopters,

      Which have proven to be problematic too. When did we acquire modern subs? Refit after refit has failed to get them out and operating? Why? The Australians turned them down as broken, used-up and not cost effective. We tried to make due and my prediction is we'll end up paying more and having less operational time than if we bought some new ones.

      it's amazing how much attention the Sea King garners.

      Gee, when Sea Kings and Gryphons fall out of the sky from metal fatigue, when the other countries come to see us for how to keep overlong serving C-130's in the air with bandaids, when the CF-18s start experiencing serious stress issues due to age, and when our old equipment is KILLING OUR SOLDIERS at an alarming rate, but our PM can go buy himself new jets at the drop of a hat.... no, that doesn't merit ANY attention, does it?

      We are a relatively small country, and the simple reality is that our military will always pale aside the US',

      We were a smaller country 50 years ago and we had the third or fourth largest military in the world, especially naval.

      I'm perfectly fine with that.

      Apparently it doesn't disturb you our soldiers are dying because of antiquated equipment. And apparently it doesn't distrub you that at one point we had 5-10K men deployed on NATO/UN missions, and now the number is in the hundreds? Gee, I wonder if the people we were helping but aren't anymore and the trouble spots we are leaving to someone else are just fine with that?

      We went into Afghanistan with troops that were perfect for the non-conventional modern warfare (i.e. snipers), did a great job, and got out after the situation had pretty much settled.

      Yes assassinations of senior government ministers and continuing gun battles and insurgent actions tell me things have really calmed down. How could I not have seen that?

      And speaking of our snipers: Why has our government blocked them getting decorated by the US for doing a good job?

      Actually the causative factor for us leaving Afghanistan was probably the death of 4 soldiers by friendly fire: Given that the conflict was pretty much resolved, such a needless loss couldn't be repeated.

      You obviously know a pretty freakin slim amount about military operations. Such casualties may have been avoidable in a perfect world. But military operations always entail risk, even in the safest circumstances. And people are human and screw up. But the screw up there may well have been from the poor training our senior officers have in large excercises (was our last Brigade level excercise in 1987?). They don't get a chance to deal with large unit ops enough to be 100% proficient. Oh, and throw in a NG Air unit pushed to make readiness (again, overstressed, this time on the US side because they are doing stuff other folks used to help out with all by themselves now).

      God save us from people like you who live in their comfortable little country and don't care much about our soldiers or the people we send them out to help.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    29. Re:In Other News... by ckedge · · Score: 2

      You have the most screwed up logic and agruments on every single point.

      Not sure if I agree with that. Real conflict still generally build up over time. Even for the Iraq situation the US took quite a few months (a year?) to build up its forces surrounding Iraq before it began the offensive.

      No it doesn't!! You think you're going to be able to predict the next war far enough in advance, *and* get political buy in from everybody to quadruple the military budget and somehow magically get 3 more batallions of recruits recruited and trained in time? What are you NUTS? Just where the hell do you get the EXPERIENCE and HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE to second guess every single military historian and experienced military leader the western world has?

      The constant criticism of the Canadian military, and calls for multi-billion dollar budget increases, might have some of its roots in the arms industry- An industry that wants to make us believe that we need loads of high tech equipment to sit rotting in warehouses.... Our individual soldiers are paid quite well (I was surprized when a friend recently joined to see the pay rates), have fantastic personal equipment and good bases.

      The calls are only constant because there is CONSTANTLY something so decrepid that at all times there is at least one thing that needs emergency attention!!! That's NOT a good standard operating procedure! Waiting until a military system becomes a hazard and a deathtrap for 10 years is not the right way to figure out that it's time to upgrade.

      You can't use the stupid politician's intransigence and political hot potato handling of the chopper program to argue that we don't really need flyable choppers on the decks of our ships.

      Rotting in warehouses??? WTF? The buying programs have been cut to the bone, we don't have a single system that isn't unavailable for extended periods of time because we don't have enough of them! That includes our "big new modern navy", which is right on the razors edge of being too small to participate.

      Our individual soldiers are NOT paid quite well, and only have fantastic personal equipment because we finally managed to convince the government to buy them new equipment, the same equipment people like you rallied against as being "un-needed" and "arms-industry sales tactics"!

      it was a self-pursued role,

      NO IT WASN'T! The Americans would LOVE to not have to pay for it all by themselves. If you don't think fighting people like Sadam Hussein, Al-Qaida, North Korea, or a future unstable China (think ahead stupid) is worth anything, come out and say it!

      You don't want to spend money on the Military, but you keep pointing out our "fabulous equipment", which is entirely a result of us HAVING SPENT money on the military despite the prior opposition of people like you. WTF?

      We are a relatively small country, and the simple reality is that our military will always pale aside the US'

      That is the stupidest most useless comment ever. Taken to it's non-logical extereme, we might as well not pay ANY ATTENTION what so ever to JUST HOW SMALL we are, PROPORTIONALLY, compared to ANYBODY! Why? Why should we spend 2 times less per person to keep the world free than the Finnish or Belgians!??

      Actually the causative factor for us leaving Afghanistan was probably the death of 4 soldiers by friendly fire

      NO IT WASN'T. You're pulling this stuff out of your ASS!!!

    30. Re:In Other News... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Rotting in warehouses??? WTF? The buying programs have been cut to the bone, we don't have a single system that isn't unavailable for extended periods of time because we don't have enough of them!

      Yes, rotting in warehouses. We recently had to destroy tens of millions of dollars of munitions because they passed their expiry date and were sitting in a warehouse. The media currently loves printing about how our armed forces have to "beg" for smart bombs during conflicts, but what they're really reporting is that we've moved more to a "on-time delivery" of perishable hardware. It hardly surprizes me that the manufacturers would rather we stockpile warehouses.

      Our individual soldiers are NOT paid quite well, and only have fantastic personal equipment because we finally managed to convince the government to buy them new equipment, the same equipment people like you rallied against as being "un-needed" and "arms-industry sales tactics"!

      Nice strawman technique there. And you want every troop to have their own personal multi-billion dollar aircraft carrier! You're crazy! As for the troops, a lot in specific areas are. I've seen the pay rates for specific areas, and it seemed pretty good to me, especially when all of the fringe benefits were included in the equation. A non-commissioned office with a family of 5 and a stay-at-home wife might have some difficulty making ends meet, but that's the case throughout society.

      That is the stupidest most useless comment ever. Taken to it's non-logical extereme, we might as well not pay ANY ATTENTION what so ever to JUST HOW SMALL we are, PROPORTIONALLY, compared to ANYBODY! Why? Why should we spend 2 times less per person to keep the world free than the Finnish or Belgians!??

      I love the proportional comments. Who sets the base rate? Is it a little race to have the highest percentage? Secondly I just checked here to find that we spend 1.3% of our GDP (~$9 billion US), while Belgium spends 1.2% (~$3 Billion US). Looks like you should do a better research job next time.

      I would rather we spend billions on special operations teams and intelligence. Those are the areas where we can actually make a difference in the world of today (a world that already has the massive conventional force of the US, who is our friend and ally).

      NO IT WASN'T. You're pulling this stuff out of your ASS!!!

      The common wisdom before the friendly fire incident was that a smaller Canadian force would be rotated in (smaller because the conflict had died down), however it was politically palitable to just pull them all out after that incident. Obviously I don't know for sure, as you sure as hell don't, what went on in the war rooms, but I would say that it sure seems like it may have given them an "out".

    31. Re:In Other News... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Canada finished the War with the World's 3rd largest Navy and the fourth largest Air Force.

      Overall, Canada was the fourth-largest military power on the planet at the end of the war. Then, it did the completely unprecedented and unilaterally disarmed.

      Canada also became an enormous factory during WWII and produced a lot of equipment for all allies and may have saved the allies from falling while the Americans continued to sit on their hands. Canada was also home of the largest flight-training program for the allies.

    32. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf? are you sure?
      Just a few years ago we had 126 CF-18s

    33. Re:In Other News... by ErikZ · · Score: 2


      What does GWB have to do with running Canada? A socialist country?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    34. Re:In Other News... by gfreeman · · Score: 1


      Nothing at all - but the post to which I was commenting said nothing about Canada in particular, so I took it that you were making a general economic reference, in that it's a given that you cannot cut social programs and shunt the money over to military applications when you need to, in ANY country.

      My wife is Canadian, so I keep one eye on the .ca press.

      Gr

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  17. Interresting, by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I go to SFU and i'm taking some chemistry classes there and never heard a word about this. I thought it would make the school newspaper at least. We are on the list though. :S

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Interresting, by Kwikymart · · Score: 2

      Just in case you are interested and havn't found it yet, SFU's machine is a beowulf cluster and is called bugaboo.

      Offtopic, the Peak (the school "newspaper" of SFU for those who don't know) wouldn't publish anything unless it portrayed the injustice of students / homeless / leftwingers etc being beaten down repeatedly by "the man", so I don't know why they would publish this.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:Interresting, by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      Lol, that's why woodsquat made the front page.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    3. Re:Interresting, by iReflect · · Score: 1

      Where on campus is it located?

    4. Re:Interresting, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sidenote to offtopic:
      While it weasn't memtioned in the peak, I am fairly sure(as another sfu student) that it was mentioned in the school newsletter. The one that usaly talkes about some grad's thesis or research. I can't remember what its name is though.

    5. Re:Interresting, by BadTiggy · · Score: 1

      I go to U of Guelph, am in computer science, and even have Deborah Stacey as one of my profs!

      I haven't heard of this until now. :)

      I hope this doesn't screw up our lab machines cause I have to stay up late there doing my next assignment. *grins*

      --
      "If I blow your mind, you have to promise not to think in my mouth."
  18. Would this chemisty problem be.... by metrazol · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why Canadian Beer sucks? ...or is it the more trying...

    What can we add to hockey rinks to make hockey more interesting?

    --
    "Life's funny sometimes." "And sometimes it isn't." --Cat's Cradle
    1. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, everybody knows American beer is far superior...NOT.

    2. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by Tuffnut · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked my urine still had the same taste as Budweiser. Not that I drink my own urine..

    3. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Belgian beer is life

    4. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by rizawbone · · Score: 1

      [i]Why Canadian Beer sucks? ...or is it the more trying... What can we add to hockey rinks to make hockey more interesting? [/i] You in a Budweiser dress?

    5. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by phyjcowl · · Score: 1

      You need to try some of the excellent Québec microbrews.

    6. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by rizawbone · · Score: 1
      ouch dissed myself. too much time on phpbb's.

      maybe i do need to switch to a weaker, tasteless, watery beer. :(

      hangs head in shame

    7. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "Belgian beer is live"

    8. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Oh yes, everybody knows American beer is far superior...

      Check out beeradvocate.com for some high quality US brew.

    9. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be giving urine an extremely bad name. Last time I checked, Bud was the worst liquid in existence.

    10. Re:Would this chemisty problem be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      British Beer is Best
      http://www.camra.org.uk

  19. For One Day? by Anenga · · Score: 5, Funny
    Most Powerful Computer in Canada - for a Day
    Oh, give them more credit than that. It takes more than one day for "the fastest computer" to be obsolete. Maybe a month, or two.
    1. Re:For One Day? by swfranklin · · Score: 1
      It takes more than one day for "the fastest computer" to be obsolete


      RTFA. This is a temporary cluster.

    2. Re:For One Day? by sean23007 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Wow. You are sooooo lame.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    3. Re:For One Day? by Fryed · · Score: 1

      Is there an acronym for "Get a sense of humor"? If not, I propose we use "GASOH", unless anyone has any better suggestions.

    4. Re:For One Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Here's a suggestion -- use it when the original joke was actually funny. This one wasn't.

    5. Re:For One Day? by swfranklin · · Score: 1
      How about an acronym for "If you're going to make a joke, try to make it funny?"

      Eh, what's the use...

  20. Yeah by aepervius · · Score: 1

    maybe they'll reach about 35 fps.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  21. goof comments aside, this is cool by dcobbler · · Score: 2

    I'm a great believer in 'use what you have' network building and the power of Metcalfe's law (and all that). Maybe this is even better than going out and haranguing the government for money for a super-expensive super-computer. If this works out, (and, I guess, that might be seen tomorrow) then even little universities (and little research departments in not-sexy areas of study) could get big computing power when they need it but not have to ransom their entire research agenda just to afford the big computer

    Dcobbler
    Cobbling together your digital environment: www.digitalcobbler.com

  22. Interesting, but why only a day? by Ascoe · · Score: 1

    Maybe if we kept it up for a week we'd find those darn extra terrestrials and cure cancer in one fell swoop.

    --
    -ascoe
  23. Re:Computing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please list a few. Also please don't forget to cite your sources.

  24. I know why by DeltaStorm · · Score: 1

    Sounds like final exams are coming up pretty quick on them, maybe they shouldn't have procrastinated.

    --
    .sdrawkcab si gis siht
  25. UNB Represent! :) by Space+Coyote · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Actually this means I'll have to wait an extra day to work on my project for my distributed / parallel computing course. So this experiment also gets to help me procrastinate :)

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    1. Re:UNB Represent! :) by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

      CS4745? Hey that's a new course! Wish they'd had that when I was there...

      --
      Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
    2. Re:UNB Represent! :) by R_McN_23 · · Score: 1

      Damn right man! Class of 2001!

      How's Dr. Bhavsar doing? (He was my undergrad thesis advisor... =)

  26. Ahhh Canada... by slobberjaws · · Score: 1

    Eh?

  27. Re:Computing in Canada by Tuzanor · · Score: 1, Troll

    now I find that very hard to believe. The government of canada has some very powerfull supercomputers used for weather. Also, I know for a fact that the Nortel labs in Ottawa have some very powerfull supercomputers. I think it is just plain ignorance that you would say someting like that. Plus, there are millions of personal computers in Canada. Well I can certainly believe that there are bigger supercomputers in the US, not even ten US universities come even close achieving your statement.

  28. Only one problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't they come up with more than one important chemistry problem?

  29. CANADA! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    First the alarming lead in Zamboni technology, now this!!

    1. Re:CANADA! by IvyMike · · Score: 2

      First the alarming lead in Zamboni technology, now this!!

      Actually, the Zamboni was invented by the son of an Italian immigrant here in the good old USA. In Southern California, surprisingly enough.

      (Yeah, yeah, offtopic, but the story's a dup anyways, and all good nerds should know more about Zambonis.)

    2. Re:CANADA! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      The machines were invented in the US, true. However the Canadians have since overtaken US Zamboni technology, and are manufacturing their own!! We now face a DANGEROUS Zamboni gap!

      http://www.cipmetalworking.com/FAB/fab_mar_02/fo wl er.htm

    3. Re:CANADA! by xutopia · · Score: 1

      Zamboni would be worth nothing if it wasn't for Hockey! And where was that invented? http://www.birthplaceofhockey.com/

    4. Re:CANADA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That small town self-declared themselves as the birth place of hockey to attract tourist, its a scam. Most hockey historians agree that Montreal is infact the real birth place of hockey.

    5. Re:CANADA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next you'll be telling us that Montreal is in the states!

  30. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone hack into this box so we can finish tivocrack?

  31. Unnecessary by DrPascal · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bunch of nerds trying to calculate how to get a date instead of going to the bar and trying it the good ole' way ... clue fellas: This is NOT the way!

    {offtopic?}

    --
    DrPascal: Not the language, the mathematician.
  32. Huh? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Is Albert Johnson's Amazing Vic-20 World Tour taking a detour through Toronto?

  33. Re:Computing in Canada by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The government of canada has some very powerfull supercomputers used for weather.

    I don't think it takes a supercomputer to predict the weather in Canada .

  34. IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by spoonist · · Score: 4, Funny

    The site appears to be solidly withstanding a thorough and complete slashdotting!! The only rational explanation is that the most powerful computer in Canadia is running their web site right now! As they say in French-Canadian, c'est incredible.

    1. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Funny

      YAY, We are all proud of the Maple Leaf state!!

    2. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Actually in French-Canadian they'd say c'est incroyable.

    3. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any normal French Canadian would say "Tabarnak de viarge! J'en r'viens pas!!"

    4. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      lol

    5. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by kilrogg · · Score: 2
      "c'est incredible"

      is not French

      That's why he said "French-Canadian" :=)

    6. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by StoatBringer · · Score: 0

      Quelle fromage!

      --
      Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
    7. Re:IT'S RUNNING NOW!! by gmarceau · · Score: 2

      Any normal French Canadian would say "Tabarnak de viarge! J'en r'viens pas!!"

      Yep, that's much much closer to it.

      Better expressed as : Ben gadon, c'est presque la bonne afaire.

      --
      This post was compiled with `% gec -O`. email me if you need the sources
  35. This could go all wrong... by dr_beno · · Score: 1

    Don't you know those Canadians are terrorists?

    --
    Don't get me wrong!
    1. Re:This could go all wrong... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Heh everybody's a terrorist if Bush can have his way. Everybody except his family (including Jeb and Jenna), Ken Lay, and the likes..

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:This could go all wrong... by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Bah... that guy's a wuss. The great author, Farley Mowatt, actually shot at an American military plane once (ok, was a 0.22 squirrel rifle, and it was from over a mile away, but still....), and former Prime Minister Trudeau (featured on our $5 bills) once paddled a canoe to Cuba....

      Canadians have been terrorists for a while now... this proves it...

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    3. Re:This could go all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron! You're an embarassment to Canada.

      Since when was PET on our 5 dollar bills?

      I suggest that you take a good hard look at the NAME on the bottom of the bill...

      It's Sir Wilfred Laurier....

      on a side note, though.... if yuo take a black magic marker and give him pointy ears and black hair, he looks remarkably similar to Leonard Nimoy!

    4. Re:This could go all wrong... by KillerBob · · Score: 2

      bah... sue me. I've had a few too many Molsons today....

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    5. Re:This could go all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take off yah hoser!

    6. Re:This could go all wrong... by Akoman · · Score: 1

      damnit! warn me about the fecking popups next time.. holy mother of god. But I haven't heard any new releases by the Arrogant Worms! What alblum are they up to now?

    7. Re:This could go all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most of the stuff the Farley Mowatt wrote was made up. He never even lived in the NWT or Yukon. He was mearly a gifted visualist, with no actual experience of northern life. It's a shame that what most people know about northern Canada is from the made up writings of one man.

  36. Wait for IBM by Servo · · Score: 2

    Give IBM a few months, and I'm sure they would be more than willing to sell them some CPU time on their on demand supercomputer.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  37. and after that... by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    its to the pub for some good quality Canadian beer.

    Not that Yankee bottled goat piss they call beer south of the border.

    1. Re:and after that... by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhh dammit, where is the -1: Canadaian WHORE! option?

      --

      "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
    2. Re:and after that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh - so your going to cap off a day of high power computing with good quality Canadian Moose piss,

      If you look up skunky beer in the dictionary - it says see Canadian beer.

    3. Re:and after that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's an acquired taste, it's simply because Canadian beer -has- a taste. As an American consumer of Canadian beer, I'm here to tell you that American beer either tastes weak or has no taste at all. It's like our breweries take a low-grade Canadian beer like Labatts or Molson and then water it down by 20% or so and increase the carbonation. Puzzling.

    4. Re:and after that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not saying that American beer is any better than Canadian beer - I am saying that of the beers brewed around the world, Canadian beer ranks right down there with the worst - In my opinion the best beer comes from Germany - followed closely by England and Ireland. There are a few good Japanese beers and Red Stripe is good if you get it in the islands (not after they nuke it or whatever they do to it when it gets imported into the US).

    5. Re:and after that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "where is the -1: **Canadaian** WHORE! option?"

      It got left out along with the -5 US Spelling option.

    6. Re:and after that... by LaughingMoon · · Score: 1

      From a german point of view, this discussion about beer is similar to people from Argentina and Brazil having about over which economy was better off....

  38. I'm flattered by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    That they quote my Slashdot posting about wanting to borrow my Commodore Amiga in the FAQ ;-)

    Shame they didn't credit me on the quote, though :-(

  39. Why did you cross the border? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    We just wanted some beer! We weren't building an evil supercomputer to SMURF attack M$.com again.

    I do no that SMURF attacks don't require a powerfull computer, so don't reply calling me a moron.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  40. Canadian supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a cluster of vic-20's.

  41. Coming to you live from under the bridge.... by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

    wtf is with all the trolls, my god the first 30 posts are from trolls! Jesus! Admins, just quietly slip up their IP's and I'm sure we could round up a posse and set their houses on fire (or more accurately their mothers basements).

    --

    "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
    1. Re:Coming to you live from under the bridge.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the post _did_ have to do with Canada after all. Why discuss its substance when you can bash Canadians with impunity instead? No reason whatsoever, apparently.

  42. Next time, they should try to solve... by HRabson · · Score: 1

    ...the Benton Fraser Paradox, or the Canadian tendency to pronounce 'about' as 'a boot'.

    1. Re:Next time, they should try to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, I've never heard anyone say 'aboot' except Americans, and I've travelled in every province and territory extensively, and have been to every US state.

    2. Re:Next time, they should try to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's curious, I've heard far more Americans say "aboot" than I have Canadians. I have only heard one Canadian man actually say "aboot" and his accent was quite laughable ;). I hate how people from southern Ontario set a laughable example of the rest of us "human" Canadians. I laugh as much as any hick yank when a moronic person from Toronto says "aboot", and "fud" for food. It's quite amusing, really.

  43. Re:Computing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha... I get it... Canada's perpetually buried under a mountain of snow, so it's always the same weather there...hahahaha.

    Such ignorance brings contempt, contempt brings hatred, and hatred brings forth the Dark Side.

  44. Could this be a new business plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Encourage people to install Microsoft software
    2. Bust them and fine them for $15,000 as soon as they forget to keep up the licence payments
    3. Use the money to get more suckers to install Microsoft software
    4. Repeat! Er, I mean, profit!

  45. wow by forkboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these! Oh wait, nevermind.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  46. Re:Computing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course not. Say...didn't I see you wearing a winter coat during the Toronto International Film festival the other month?

  47. Re:Computing in Canada by quantaman · · Score: 2

    Perhaps I should rephrase that. I'm referring to computing power available for scientific computation in universities. This information comes from my brother who is completing a masters in physics and has intensive computing demands and is well in touch with the computing demand. The university I attend does not have as bad a situation as most but the fact remains that there ARE american universities with more computing power than is available to the combined scientific community in Canadian universities.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Very poor troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's spelt Beowulf. With a u. And "never mind" is two separate words. Fool.

    1. Re:Very poor troll. by forkboy · · Score: 2

      Bitter little geek, aren't we? Go upstairs and kiss your mom g'night for me, eh?

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  50. Re:Computing in Canada by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2

    I don't think it takes a supercomputer to predict the weather in Canada.

    Yeah, yeah. This is only funny to those who don't live in Canada, of course.

    If you live in Newfoundland, for instance, you'll know that no supercomputer in the world could ever have a hope of predicting the weather for the text fifteen minutes. I once visited for a week, and I saw sunny, cloudy, windy, calm, cold, warm, not to mention rain, snow, and even hail.

    Now if you'd said Vancouver, on the other hand...

    int main() { printf("rain\n"); }

    :-)

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  51. Ah, the memories by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmph. I remember back in January of '98 when I had the most powerful computer in Canada! Just me, my laptop, some cold soup from a can, and some candles...

    1. Re:Ah, the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, whys all you Amercans always makin' fun of us CAnAdiAns eh?

      Like, shut up, eh?

      Hoser.

      (Looks for donut.)

  52. Re:Computing in Canada by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, yeah. This is only funny to those who don't live in Canada, of course.

    That would be.... let's see .... 99.5% of the world's population?

  53. Re:Computing in Canada by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And probably about 70% of Slashdot's population. Not sure if you noticed, but there is a very high percentage of Canadians who visit Slashdot. I suspect it's due to that national program to integrate high speed into our igloo clusters.

  54. Slashdot beware !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're planning to slashdot slashdot :(

  55. It's always cold/raining/snowing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right. Believe me. I'm Canadian and living in Canada. The weather here does suck. All the freakin' time. So don't bother moving here. You hear me? Our beer and women aren't much to talk about. The mountains and forests make the country really rather ugly and unaccessible too. The stories you've heard of clean water and metropolitan cities like Vancouver and Toronto are untrue. So don't move here. Stay away. The weather sucks and it all goes downhill from here. Do not move to Canada.

    1. Re:It's always cold/raining/snowing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...I don't know where in Canada you live but here in Toronto the summers are pretty fucking scorching. Not that I like that sort of thing, mind, I can't stand the humidity personally, but it definitely _does not_ always rain/snow/whatever over here. In fact, last winter we hardly got any snow -- none at all for Christmas. Yeah, the winters are pretty cold in comparison to, say, California, but not much different from Boston or New York. I guess it _is_ pretty amusing to tell all these poor Americans that it always snows in Canada and then laugh when they show up wearing winter clothes in the summer, but the joke does get very old very quick, at least for myself.

  56. Re:Computing in Canada by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    national program to integrate high speed into our igloo clusters.

    I am sure that was made practical by the fact that Canada is the first country in the world to have ambient temperature superconductivity materials in all of their communications and power distribution systems.

  57. Why did the supercomputer cross the road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get away from the lazy humans.

  58. Re:Computing in Canada by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2

    I am sure that was made practical by the fact that Canada is the first country in the world to have ambient temperature superconductivity materials in all of their communications and power distribution systems.

    That's right, this is the superior technology we're going to use in our grand scheme of conquest! First, we take back Alaska. Then, the rest of the U.S. Then, the world!

    MUAAA HAA HAA HA HA HAHAHA!

    Ha Ha Hahahaha!

    Ho Ho Hohoho.

    Heh. Heh.

    Whoooooo.

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  59. Oh lord... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    Some Newfie in St. John's managed to get his IBM 9595 in the loop...

  60. Re:Computing in Canada by cscx · · Score: 2

    How true, I suppose the amount of snow varies from season to season?

  61. Shared resources by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

    Interesting paragraph from the site:

    If CISS-1 is a short-term vision, then we hope that CISS will become a long-term vision. Canada Foundation for Innovation requires that the computing sites share 20% of their resources. One can envision CISS being a monthly event where, for example, 3 days a month are set aside for large-scale national computations. This would be unique in the world, and a tremendous opportunity for Canadian scientists.

    This is pretty cool.. I wonder if they plan on including p2p clients in the future?

  62. Wait just a gosh-darn minute here by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it's going to solve in a day what would otherwise take 6 years, it has to be almost 2200 times as powerful as their baseline. With 18 universities cooperating, that's about 120 times the baseline provided by each uni. From the article: "The University [one of the 18] will have 108 computer processors helping work on the problem." So, their baseline is a slow single-processor machine - who thinks that's anywhere near a fair comparison? Wow, we built a cluster! And it's lots faster than a single-processor machine! Never would have guessed!

    So they've got 2000 processors working on this problem. Probably about as much horsepower as 1000 recent CPUs, or 250 U of rackspace. About 7 racks full of 1U systems with 4 Athlons in 'em. A million dollars would easily cover that, and if you stick it in northern Canada, you get cold clean air for free so the ongoing costs would be much less as well.

    What I'm getting at is that I'm not real impressed, either with the article or with the project. If they spent more than 3 weeks organizing this, it would have been faster to just have one uni run the simulation in-house.

    1. Re:Wait just a gosh-darn minute here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think (-- keyword think) that the advantage of this sytem (I agree with your logic above) is that they have that massive amounts of RAM + HD. From the Article, IIRC, these tasks were VERY memory intensive -- you could run it on a single machine, but then you'd have to run into swap problems ... and even if swamp problems were solved, there's always the question of whether all the data could be cached on a single machine's HD -- thus, the 18 machine offers more advantage than just the CPU power.

    2. Re:Wait just a gosh-darn minute here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A would've be nice ...

    3. Re:Wait just a gosh-darn minute here by Constellation · · Score: 1

      The base line machine is probably a high-end PC. As the article says, these applications take a large amount of RAM an disk space. The machine that the article is talking about is named Hammerhead and is a 108 processor alpha 833MHz Beowulf culster with 108GB of RAM distributed ove 27 nodes (so 4 prosessors and 4GB of RAM per node), with 2TB of disk. The other participationg unviersities are contributing similar resources. For more information on some of the resources being committed look at

      http://www.sharc-net.ca/Hardware/index.php
      http ://www.westgrid.ca

      The interesting question is how well will CISS actually work? The problem is being broken up and submitted in peices to each of the participating machines, however CISS does not have any higher priority than any other job (at least on SHARCNet) so how much time it will actually get is questionable, as these machines are fairly busy.

  63. Re:Computing in Canada by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    "I don't think it takes a supercomputer to predict the weather in Canada."

    It does. Seriously. The computing power necessary to accurately predict the weather is several orders of magnitude greater than that needed to calculate the necessary space vehicle trajectories to put a person on the moon. Try a massive vector mechanics + thermodynamics problem scaled up to the size of the planet earth. You'll see what I mean.

    Remember: Today, we can't even predict the weather accurately for the next couple of weeks, but we can predict if a distant asteroid will hit the earth in the next few thousand years.

  64. How many? by reitoei1971 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How many computers would it take to count all the world's Canadian jokes?

  65. Fantasy and Reality.. by hackwrench · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wil Wheaton is an actor. Wesley Crusher is a fictional character...
    In other news, Canada, its ego buoyed by its success in the computing arena, declares war on the rest of the world, citing the rest of the worlds "blatant inferiority".

    1. Re:Fantasy and Reality.. by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      Hello, I am from France, and I real slashdot. Where do I go to surrender?

  66. errr, How? by perky · · Score: 2

    The site states that Canada has over 20 serious supercomputer installations. It also states that the problem being tackled would normally take 3-6 years. So how do they intend to solve the problem in less than one one-thousandth of the normal time by using only 20 times the computational power? Something here doesn't add up.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    1. Re:errr, How? by Dr.+Cfire · · Score: 1
      They are going to use the impresive power of the U of C's pdp 11's. A spectacle of graphics and sound. Seriously we still use the pdp 11 for first year assembly.

      mov #0, R0
      trap 3
      inbuffer
      2
      clr R0
      movb inbuffer(R5), R2

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective with what users it wants to be friendly with.
  67. Re:Computing in Canada by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 1

    It is well known that Canadians have 57 words for 'snow'. So knowing which one could be needed tomorrow could be useful.

    Does that require a supercomputer? Or 6 coins?

  68. What are those sneaky canadians up to.... by Vaystrem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    #357 IBM Netfinity Cluster PIII 1 GHz - Eth Government Canada 2002 Classified

  69. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put the buddha down.

    Great lyric.

  70. Of course, you know what the final output will be? by atroxi · · Score: 2, Funny

    42

    (/me ducks)

  71. Re:Not fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell do *I* get modded down when I post something similar?

  72. ...a thought... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone should write a General Distributed Comuptation client (ala seti@home or TivoCrack) screensaver and make a 'pseudo-cluster' out of all the Computers Lab/Office PeeCees...

    A group of some kind could be created to provide access / approval of proposed usages etc etc and it would create a new massive-computation resource... of some kind... just a thought.

    1. Re:...a thought... by apweiler · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a project like that somewhere? I'm sure I read something about it a while back, but I can't even remember the name, let alone a URL. Damn.

  73. The new /. effect.. by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    I do no that SMURF attacks don't require a powerfull computer, so don't reply calling me a moron.

    Okay, you're an illiterate moron.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. SkyNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this how the SkyNet came to be?

  76. Slashdot 10/23/02; Seti@Home much faster by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Slashdot discussed this two weeks ago. I wrote this response :-)


    According to Seti@Home, Canada has 213307 machines working on SETI problems, which have contributed 71519 machine-years. The academic project has about 1% this many machines. Some of them may be faster than the average SETI machine. My article also commented about Canada's place on top500.org.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  77. Vive l'Acadie! by Glytch · · Score: 2

    He was probably using Acadian Peninsula "Franglais". Flippez le switch, s'il vous please. And close the porte, c'est froid.

    I swear, if any French or English professors ever visited Bathurst, they'd have a heart attack during their first conversation...

  78. The American Version by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

    The American Version will do it 48% faster and not try to compare itself to the Canadian version.

    1. Re:The American Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pat itself on the back while the rest of the world laughs at it.

  79. Re:Computing in Canada by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    First, we take back Alaska.

    And Alaska was part of Canada exactly when?

  80. Re:Beer Cooled Tablet PC by jeanicinq · · Score: 0

    With the introduction of the TABLET PC, I wonder how fast can those computers really distribute a supercoolant solution.

    Hey, do you predict a BEAR market ahead!

  81. Re:Vive l'Acadie! (pis alors!) by tiggles · · Score: 1

    The way I see it, we're ahead of the curve.

    All languages in natural use adopt bits of the languages they're exposed to (English is ridden with French words, and is adopting slang and geek-speak at almost alarming rates). Acadia is free from the dictates of the Academie (which lowered the barriers to entry), and was abandoned in a sea of English (or forcibly exiled there), that any french is spoken at all is mostly a testament to Acadian resilience.

    There's a similar situation in Switzerland where they speak an incomprehensible Swiss-German to each other but can get on just fine in regular German (and usually English). All the Acadians know can speak properly in English AND French.

    I guess I should say my language is just as valid as yours.

  82. Awwwwww crap... by Hydro-X · · Score: 2

    And I thought my residence bandwidth sucked now...

  83. Seward's folly by phorm · · Score: 2

    This whole thread seems a bit offtopic, but to humour those in it...
    Alaska wasn't actually a province, Canada lost out when the failed to buy it from the Russians, who sold it in 1867 (though it didn't become a state until 1959).

    Look up "Seward's Folly" on google for more info.

    It's always seemed somewhat odd having a American state attached on the northwestern borders, far from the rest of the US, but this page seems to cover most of the details

  84. Read more carefully by lightweave · · Score: 1

    If you have read the articel more carfully then you would have noticed that they are NOT using 20 times the computing power they currently have. They are using the computing power currently SPREAD over 20 SITES in a parallel effort.
    Funny that so many people comment but appear to not read what they are "discussing" about.

    1. Re:Read more carefully by perky · · Score: 2

      If you have read the articel more carfully then you would have noticed that they are NOT using 20 times the computing power they currently have. They are using the computing power currently SPREAD over 20 SITES in a parallel effort.
      Which part don't you understand? The article says that the problem would take 3-6 years using one of the installations. Using 20 such installations can provide a maximum of 20 times the computational horsepower. Probably less depending on how parallel the problem is. So how are they planning on getting a 1000 times + speedup?

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  85. Why does Canada hate us (U.S.)? by d^2b · · Score: 1
    Quothe the poster
    As an American living in Canada, I find it very surprising to see the pent up anger that a several Canadians seem to have for Americans.

    Umm, it is not just Canada, it is the entire planet. Sorry to ruin your day. :-)

    But (semi)-seriously I think large, powerful neighbours (note spelling!) are universally resented, even if they have not invaded recently.

    I think the big difference is that Canadians are actually interested in the U.S. As tacky as "Talking to Americans" is, it is really about the US, if in a completely distorted way, where say South Park essentially makes fun of the idea of hating Canadians. I mean who cares about Canada really?

    --Canuck in exile

  86. Re:Of course, you know what the final output will by noackjr · · Score: 1

    In case you're lost:
    42

  87. Re:Computing in Canada by two_ply · · Score: 1
    This is more than a little oftopic but...

    The '57 [or 54 or 64 depending on who you ask...] words for snow' thing' is a bit false. The inuit language combines adjectives and nouns into one word. ie. "wet snow" becomes "wetsnow". When whitey was first learning the language the different 'words' used for the different kinds of snow were counted as seperate, and thus the urban legend began. Saying that the inuit have 57 words for snow is about as fair as saying that the scandanavian tongues have 100 words for 'ham'.

  88. Canada 1 v USA 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont forget that when the chips were down and the USA had a war with Canada - Canada KICKED THE USA's ASS.

    It wasn't the Canada's capital that was burned down!

  89. And the question was... by TheMidget · · Score: 1

    "what is the atomic number of molybdenum?"

  90. Not a GRID computer? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    The GRID computing project http://www.gridcomputing.com/ is a set of software standards for linking computers into super computing networks. Most of the world's supercomputing centers particpate in one way or the other. However it appears from the webpage of the this Candanian project that they are not using GRID and going their own way.

  91. Canada Unites by Tom2K2 · · Score: 1

    Today I am a proud Canadian as we all unite, and together with the processing power of our 26 Commodore 64's, are able to solve a problem in a day that would of taken 6 years to calculate. How many times over does Canadian beer have in alcohol content over American beer? (we all know the answer but we just want to double check..) So take off you hoser, eh! Golden...

    Oh Canada, Our home and native land...

  92. Re:Computing in Canada by naasking · · Score: 2

    I don't think it takes a supercomputer to predict the weather in Canada .

    It would take a hell of alot more than one actually. There's a saying, "if you don't like the weather in Canada, wait 5 minutes".

  93. Re: [Cook] Your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the record, Cook was born in Buffalo, NY and obtained his Ph.D. at Harvard.

    http://www.cs.toronto.edu/DCS/People/Faculty/sacoo k.html

  94. Re:Computing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I joke about the weather where I live, why can' t I joke about it where you live.
    Lighten up.

  95. SSH! by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Not a secret anymore now, is it?
    Traitor.

  96. Bad joke by fonetik · · Score: 1

    Isn't that a group project?

  97. Re:Computing in Canada by Llyr · · Score: 1
    There's a saying, "if you don't like the weather in Canada, wait 5 minutes".

    Yes... 5 minutes from now, you'll like it even less.

  98. Re:Computing in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Large amount of computing power is used to decifer and merge radar data and atmospheric data from across the country. Much of this data is used to keep Canadian and American planes safe, and the US and Canada have an agreement detailing standards on wheather data which is exchanged between the two contries. BTW, Canada has better weather radar coverage than the US, especially in Ontario.