Slashdot Mirror


Tom's Hardware Reviews First Player for DivX Video

Idimmu Xul writes "Tom's Hardware has a review of the DP-450: the first player for DivX video in Hi-Fi format! Until now, movies in space-saving DivX (MPEG-4) format could only be viewed on a PC. The KiSS DVD player is the first standalone device for TVs and projectors." Very cool, although it will render my stacks of VCDs obsolete.

244 comments

  1. hehehe by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Very cool, although it will render my stacks of VCDs obsolete.

    I hope that's your stack of legal VCDs ;]

    1. Re:hehehe by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course he could have RTFA and realized it plays VCDs as well.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:hehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obsolete, not unusable. Why settle for VCD quality when you can leave it in Divx format?

    3. Re:hehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe he said that because divx movies in general, can have a lot better quality for a lot less space. IIRC, VCD's use simple mpg video for encoding, which takes up a bunch more space than current divx.

  2. Great! by Omkar · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a step forward for DivX. I don't think most normal people know much about DivX though - perhaps this will help. Did any of you know there's even a DivX dev kit for the GameCube?

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of 'normal'
      I doubt there's a college kid in the country
      that has a PeeCee and doesn't know

      High speed dorm access combined with PeeCee requirement of
      many universities have 'em all swapping divx

    2. Re:Great! by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Great! Too bad Nintendo didn't realize that they were fucking their own sister by including that mini-DVD crap.

    3. Re:Great! by zonker · · Score: 0

      i'm not sure how you come to this conclusion as it was in their best interest to curb piracy... it may be a free market, but that doesn't make things free.

  3. This is useless. by Krapangor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A average TV-Set has a dot matrix with 0.12 inches dot distance. That means that it has a very bad resolution. It's one of the reasons why you should watch TV only from a larger distance 2 meters or so (the other is of course gamma radiation). However this implies that you really can't see the very little details. But the point about DivX compression is in fact these details. All older compression schemes used to delete these due to lossy compression.
    So, a DivX player with a normal TV set is useless. You should connect it either to your computer screen or get one of these new plasma or LCD TV-sets.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:This is useless. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2, Informative

      divx is even more lossy than earlier compression schemes. The quality is like VHS, not even SVHS. Also, the resolution is limited by the original NTSC (or PAL) signal which isn't exactly 1080i. If you want quality, you'd better stick with the mpeg2 format from the original DVD (unless you're doing your own film transfer), and even then, televisions can display it as well as a computer monitor. When 1080i HD-DVDs are finally released you will have a point however.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    2. Re:This is useless. by jetmarc · · Score: 1

      If not for better quality per disc.. It would certainly help to have more minutes playtime at equal quality, wouldn't it? After all, VCD films come on two discs because MPEG-1 can't fit more than ~60 minutes on each.

    3. Re:This is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I care to differ.

      VCD suffers from blockiness even at very high bitrates.

      VHS/VCD is only at 2xx*3xx resolution and is not suited for widescreen. Also, the audio in general sucks.

      mpeg4 like divx is much more intelligent and tends to soften/blur the image as opposed to generating blockiness. Which is what the eye prefers.

      I watched some of these recent XViD/DiVX dvd-screener releases in a friends "multimedia room" on a 4m wide screen and a surround with subwoofer and it was _really_ enjoyable. Either you get the original 5.1 DD sound ripped from the DVD or you get a 130+kbit/s LAME VBR mp3 track. Very enjoyable indeed. :))

      It's not as good as the original of course, but at one tenth of the size ...

    4. Re:This is useless. by wmansir · · Score: 1

      So by your logic DVD is useless too?

    5. Re:This is useless. by jwilcox154 · · Score: 1

      Wrong, I have MCoG in VCD Format, it has 3 Episodes along with their documentaries per cd, at around 20 Minutes per episode, and 5 Minutes per Documentary, that equals about oh, 75 Minutes Per CD. the Maximum play time for a VCD is 74 Minutes on a 74 Min. CD and 80 Minutes on a 80 Min. CD.

    6. Re:This is useless. by Echnin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. The point about DivX is high resolution without too much loss at small file sizes. I watch DivX all the time on my TV using TV-out. The only details I don't notice are the artifacts, which are usually very visible and distracting on my computer screen.

      As I have loads of CDs with DivX movies, this would be very nice. Unfortunately, it's too expensive because I'm pretty much broke all the time. I assume it also doesn't have the video filters that my computer does, either.

      It says it's MPEG-4 compatible. Does that mean that it plays XviD and WMV too? And does it play DivX 3.11 or just 4-5?

      --
      Lalala
    7. Re:This is useless. by specialized_sworks · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll differ with you on this...
      With *the same data rates* the divx encoding will provide better video. It's a more efficient compression scheme which allows *more* detail to be encoded.

      The issue is that many people encode at abismal data rates so the quality is bad. The file size is 1/2 of the MPEG2 but the quality is worse. Given the same file size in MPEG2 or DIVX and the DIVX will look better.

      -Dubya

    8. Re:This is useless. by chamenos · · Score: 1

      i agree. the author of the post you replied to probably hasn't seen a proffesionally encoded divx file. a properly encoded divx, is almost indistinguishable from the original DVD it was encoded from.

    9. Re:This is useless. by Cyris · · Score: 1

      According to all of the other information I have read about this, it does not support the 3.11 version. Only 4 and better.

      --Cyris

    10. Re:This is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, You Really Like to Capitalize random Words in Your sentenCes.

    11. Re:This is useless. by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      As Specialized Sworks already stated, mpeg4 has superior quality at the same bitrate. I can show you an episode of Friends in 240MB mpeg-1 and 110MB mpeg-4 and the quality is comparable. mpeg1 seems to capture details better, but the tiliing, or grid of squares that are compressed are clearly visible. mpeg-4 will hide the tiling better, but lose some detail. That same episode in mpeg-4 at 240MB would look almost broadcast perfect. All of this is at 352x240 resolution. At 640x480 mpeg-4 would need closer to 400MB to look broadcast quality.

    12. Re:This is useless. by rezonat0r · · Score: 1

      "So, a DivX player with a normal TV set is useless"

      Utter, utter crap. You should be modded "funny" at best. Its not like hooking this up to a 'normal' TV (which by your standards probably means 'giant hunk of dung') will look like a grid of 4 giant pixels or anything. It'll look just fine, thank you.

      "All older compression schemes used to delete these due to lossy compression"

      Ummm, DivX is quite lossy my friend. On my rather old but still fine 52" Hitachi Ultravision, even the compression artifacts on great-transfer DVD's are apparent. And great quality DivX files still look a bit soft compared to DVDs.

      This is with playback on my Xbox (which incidentally has been doing DivX on TV for some time now, and without having to burn anything - it streams straight from any Samba share).

      You should connect it either to your computer screen

      Then what's the point of buying this device?!

      or get one of these new plasma or LCD TV-sets.

      Sure, that definitely sounds like the solution. NOT. To those who modded this guy up - OFF WITH YOUR HEADS!!

    13. Re:This is useless. by LadyLucky · · Score: 1

      Dude, there's no gamma radiation coming out of that TV of yours.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    14. Re:This is useless. by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree with "specialized_sporks." --You don't know what the hell you're talking about.

      Gamma rays, shmamma rays. And what the hell is a "meter" anyway?

      :P

    15. Re:This is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but could you even name one "professional" application of DivX? It's a home luser codec.

    16. Re:This is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard used it the movies in WarCraft 3. Quality was amazing. And who gives a shit what the "professionals" think anyways? It's fairly easy to use, it's cheap (even the Pro version is only $30), equal quality at lower bitrates can be achieved over other codecs such as MPEG-2. It works. I don't need a professional's blessing before I can decide that this is a good product.

    17. Re:This is useless. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      divx is even more lossy than earlier compression schemes. The quality is like VHS

      Ah, so you know nothing about DivX eh? Sure, if you have a 100MB DivX file, it is going to be VHS quality, but if you are willing to make the files bigger, you'll have no quality problems at all. If you take a DVD (up to about 2 hours) and encode it so it fills up a CD (ie. 700MB), you will have a DivX file that is only slighty less hi-res than the original DVD... and that is really incredible considering that the DVD is several GBytes, and you are shrinking that to less than 3/4 of a GB.

      There is one advantage of MPEG2 over DivX, and that is because the MPEG4 standard does not allow a resolution as high as MPEG2. While the difference is resolutions is nominal, it means you can't possibly get higher resolutions than DVDs already have, you can only shrink their filesize while maintaing almost identical quality.

      Why the MPEG4 standard is so limited would be a very good question to ask someone in the know. If a MPEG4 codec broke the standard and allowed higher resolutions, there would be good reason to use MPEG4 on a DVD, as you'd have incredibly high resolutions (several orders of magnitude that of current DVDs) in much less space.

      Another question to ask is, why isn't the HDTV standard utilizing MPEG4 instead of MPEG2? If they used MPEG4, you could have just as much quality, in a fraction of the spectrum. Stations wouldn't even have needed more spectrum space to include HDTV, as their current allotment would be more than enough... Changing to a lower frequency would have been a good move however, as it would allow for broadcasts to trave much greater distances.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:This is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that's right.....

      That's why also think DVD useless over VHS right ??

      Anyway, can you spell H.D.T.V. or even V.G.A.?
      (You can connect a VGA monitor through the SCART connector)

  4. DVD player info page by mr.henry · · Score: 4, Informative

    This page has a huge database of players and tells you how well they play VCD, SVCD, XSVCD, DVD-R, etc. I used it recently to make sure my new Panasonic could player SVCD's.

    1. Re:DVD player info page by Foresto · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know why the Memorex mvd-2028 is no longer listed on the list of players that support divx files? When I looked a week ago, it was listed.

  5. you know it's gonna happen by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 5, Insightful

    something tells me that the bighead in the entertainment industry are not gonna like this. They alredy claim that divx piracy is killing them as it is, and now there is an option for those not into computers. I also have to wonder what they are gonna do about it. If they can make it illegal to post information that would allow one to crack ceratin securities, could they ban a set-top divx player?

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
    1. Re:you know it's gonna happen by TobyWong · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They won't like it for sure but it would be hard to make a case that a compression algorithm is inheirently evil. Most likely they will just launch a series of groundless lawsuits against this small company and run them out of money.

      --
      - Toby
    2. Re:you know it's gonna happen by enos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dubya already claims that entire nations are evil, so what's a little algorithm?

      --
      boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
    3. Re:you know it's gonna happen by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      You know, these codecs have other uses besides piracy. Some of us convert our DV camcorder footage into xvid or divx for instance!

    4. Re:you know it's gonna happen by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      What can they really do? Thay claimed MP3 was evil and now nearly 50% of the DVD players on the market plays MP3...

      It's just a matter of time. With enough lawyers and money they can delay this thing a little bit, but that's all there is about it!

    5. Re:you know it's gonna happen by tftp · · Score: 1
      Thay claimed MP3 was evil and now nearly 50% of the DVD players on the market plays MP3...

      That's because evil things sell. "Bad" means good business.

      This is exactly the problem Sony and others face - one branch of the company wants to block copying of its movies, and another branch wants to sell fastest computers to rip those very movies :-)

  6. Re:How is this possible? by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    The codec in the article is related to the DVD format in name only. The codec guys chose the name as a bit of mockery.

    --
    -Dave
  7. it's flash-able ! by heymjo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the fact that this thing is firmware-updateable makes it extra cool (and warrants it a lifespan of longer than 1y). It does all the common formats + divX , yay !! Now if only someone could tell me why they named this thing "Kiss" ...

    1. Re:it's flash-able ! by specialized_sworks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Use the QCAST for the PS2... it's even better. Plays all these formats

      It updates its software automatically over the internet.

      -Dubya

    2. Re:it's flash-able ! by Ringlord · · Score: 1

      Beeing firmvare-updateable also allowed them to include support for OGG.

  8. Doh.. no xvid? by rehabdoll · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Didnt find any information about xvid support in this review. I still down own a stationary dvd-player and i think ill wait until theres a product that will include support for xvid.

    1. Re:Doh.. no xvid? by tempmpi · · Score: 4, Informative

      It supports all real MPEG-4 Codecs as long as they only use Advanced Simple Profile functions. As long as your XVID Video doesn't use QPel motion compensation or global motion compensation your xvid file will work. (You also can't use these features in DivX 5.0 files if you want to play them on this player.)

      --
      Jan
    2. Re:Doh.. no xvid? by cioxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      xVid simply surpasses any DivX codec out there. Small size, superior quality, Open Source, the works.

      OT: For those of you unfamiliar with xVid codec, have a look. ;)

    3. Re:Doh.. no xvid? by Dugsmyname · · Score: 1

      XVID is compatible with the xbox media player divx software for the xbox game console. In one word "unbelievable". The quality of a new movie in xvid format on a 46" projection television was breathtaking. It was like watching a SuperBit DVD.

    4. Re:Doh.. no xvid? by zsazsa · · Score: 1

      It better work with XVID, as Sigma Designs stole XVID's source in violation of the GPL to develop their "REALmagic MPEG-4 Video Codec." I believe most of the GPL problems have been ironed out by now, though.

    5. Re:Doh.. no xvid? by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      What about the container format? Will it support ogg or mp4(the real one) containers rather than avi?

    6. Re:Doh.. no xvid? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Bah! FFMpeg kicks it's ass.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  9. User leeway mentioned by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    So what exactly are those three little pins mentioned in one of the pictures (sure to be /.'d by now i suppose) They didnt actually explain did they?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:User leeway mentioned by jetmarc · · Score: 2, Informative

      From their naming, they provide access to write the flash memory (maybe when a cdr flash failed due to power brown out) and to an I2C data memory (which may hold configuration or product serial number).

  10. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's simply executing his fair use right of making backups of the movies he owns.

    1. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mispelled "movies other people own." Not much going on in the way of fair use there.

    2. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mispelled "I am a fucktard." Go screw yourself

  11. really the first? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    I thought at least one manufacturer (maybe Apex?) was already making a DVD player with divx support.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  12. Re:How is this possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Divx and DivX are not the same format.

  13. Re:How is this possible? by colaco · · Score: 1
    The name is the same, but they are differnt things...

    The DivX that you are talking about it's based on MPEG-2 like any DVD.

    The DivX that we here are talking about it's a codec based on MPEG-4.

  14. Re:How is this possible? by mr.henry · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I think when it first started, it was typed as DivX;) with a little wink.

  15. There's more by BusterB · · Score: 5, Informative

    It also supports ogg/vorbis files. Ogg Traffic

    1. Re:There's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So will it play the .ogm files (xvid and vorbis codecs) that I get when I rip DVDs using dvdrip under Linux?

      That would fucking rule...

    2. Re:There's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to the company's site but I couldn't figure out how to buy one. No price either. Really too bad because I was prepared to buy two of them today.

  16. Re:How is this possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    DivX (the compression algorithm) is not the same as Divx (the pay-for-play DVD scheme.) The DivX discussed in this article plays files compressed with the DivX compression scheme. A standard DivX file is roughly 120-200 MB per half hour of video.

    Fansubbed anime releases are done nowadays through DivX instead of sending tapes out (like the old days...)

  17. subject by Inf0phreak · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I hear, it doesn't work quite as well as one could hope. First of all, it doesn't support DivX3.11 so all those illegal DVD-rips won't play on it. Second: It doesn't support MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile, so if you encoded your video with Quarter Pixel Motion Estimation or Global Motion Compensation it won't play. And finally, I've heard reports that it doesn't work on MPEG-4 compliant videos encoded with XviD, so I'd say that it is pretty much a piece of crap. And don't forget that its MPEG-4 decoding chip was made by Sigma Designs. The very same company that stole code from XviD. I won't EVER buy anything made by those thieving bastards. And my last gripe: If it isn't region free, then it's worthless.

    --
    ________
    Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
    1. Re:subject by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "If it isn't region free, then it's worthless"

      You raise an interesting point; one which made me think, and this is what I came up with: Region coding can be handled in two places: the hardware, and the firmware. The firmware of the player can be updated/hacked, just like all my standalone DVD players, so I can play the DVD's I FARKING BOUGHT IN JAPAN you MPAA Frafgd$##%#$% anyways... And since the hardware (the DVD drive) is just a PC DVD drive, you can connect that to your computer and update that as well, if neccesary.

      My two bits on XVID: The whole DiVX frimfram is complex enough for the average user. Thanks to XViD for introducing another codec that to this day, while not groundbreaking, let alone neccesary, is making the video codec situation tricky to deal with.

    2. Re:subject by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      My two bits on XVID: The whole DiVX frimfram is complex enough for the average user. Thanks to XViD for introducing another codec that to this day, while not groundbreaking, let alone neccesary, is making the video codec situation tricky to deal with.

      That is my objection to the file format fiasco. People don't want to leave good enough alone so they'll release yet another incompatible break-away codec with only marginal improvements.

      This does not make for anything resembling long term storage possible because there is no guarantee that any particular file format will still be used a year from now, forget twenty.

    3. Re:subject by number · · Score: 3, Informative

      What are you talking about? DivX, XviD and ffmpeg are all creating MPEG-4 spec-compliant video streams. As far as the decoder can see, streams created by any of them were created by the same encoder.

      If you don't like the work the XviD team is doing (i.e. a free, open-source implementation of the MPEG-4 video spec), don't use it.

    4. Re:subject by rudiger · · Score: 1

      why can't we all just get along (and use SVCD)? it is a much superior format to divx, it is standard, and i ave never popped in a freshly made SVCD in to a DVD player and have it not work. why are people so hung up w/ divx/xvid?

      and as for the size issue, in this day and age of super mega broadband connections, ~3hrs or less and you are done. what's the big hurry?

    5. Re:subject by moonbender · · Score: 1
      As far as the decoder can see, streams created by any of them were created by the same encoder.
      Hm. If it's all the same to the decoder, why did I have to install a codec to get XviD videos to run? Without it, I only got audio and a green screen ... Not that I mind, took me 5 minutes to acquire a compiled version of XviD. (Sorry if the question is dumb -- if it helps, I'm eager to learn. ;))
      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:subject by jwilcox154 · · Score: 1

      Oh Yeah, and only get 40 Minutes maximum per CD? No Thanks, I'll just stick with Divx;-).

    7. Re:subject by Briareos · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I agree with you about the limited usefulness of this device when it doesn't support MP4 ASP (don't give a damn about DivX 3.11...) there's no reason why you couldn't make the drive region free; there's even a page with illustrated step-by-step instructions so probably even Joe Sixpack could do it, as long as he owns a PC...

      np: Sabi - A Scene When The Train Leaves (Metamatics - Rewired In My Manor)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    8. Re:subject by number · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is a limitation of the AVI format, which people continue to stuff MPEG-4 video into for reasons unknown. It requires that you write "FourCC" identification codes, and those codes are what determines which codec is required to decompress it.

      XviD will decode AVI files with the FourCC IDs XVID, DIVX or DX50, whereas DivX only decodes its own DIVX/DX50. FFvfw (a VFW port of libavcodec) will decode XVID, XVIX, DIVX, DX50, FVFW and a number of other FourCC codes which all identify video that is purely MPEG-4.

      The MPEG-4 systems format (i.e. *.mp4, just as *.mpg is for MPEG-1/2) is what MPEG-4 video is supposed to reside in, and once you mux an XviD/DivX/ffmpeg MPEG-4 stream into it, the FourCC mess is left behind, and any spec-compliant MPEG-4 decoder (say, Envivio) will be able to decode it.

    9. Re:subject by chamenos · · Score: 1

      i agree...xvid is pretty redundant. it just adds to the mess of various video codecs out there. its not as if it has double the quality and half the filesize of divx.

    10. Re:subject by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Thanks! That explains some of the peculiarities I experienced when dealing with AVIs.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    11. Re:subject by rudiger · · Score: 1

      it is closer to 50, and DVD burners are getting cheaper, just burn all 2 or 3 parts on one of those.

    12. Re:subject by sixide · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree... XviD is basically reproducing the features of DivX 5, but it is 1. Free, 2. Open Source, 3. A LOT more configurable. And, it doesn't have the built-in smoothing that DivX 5 does. It's not redundant if it's better.

  18. Re:DivX = MPEG-4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The DivX in question here does indeed
    equal MPEG-4.. so.. DivX, the product
    most people who have a little computer
    know-how associate with the name, is
    indeed == MPEG-4. So keep your facts
    correct, please.

    If you're thinking of the old divx-scheme
    that was a fiasco.. well, as I said, anyone
    with a little computer know-how associates
    divx with the premier mpeg-4 compression format
    for personal use.. not some long-forgotten
    thingy that never took off.

  19. Re:How is this possible? by Zillatron · · Score: 4, Informative
    Divx was created as a means of dvd rentals on the first generation of DVD players. I think circuit city came up with the format. Get the disc, watch it for a week, then it wouldnt work anymore, so you threw it away. My friend has a DVD player like 4 years ago that played Divx discs.

    While true in and of itself, this is not at all the same thing as the DivX video compression codec that enterprising people are using to store their videos now.

    Some folks are kind enough to help us see that distinction by refering to it at DivX ;-) You can grab the codec over at http://www.divx-digest.com/software/divxcodec.htm l if you want to take it for a test drive.

  20. what is the point of this? by jonsen · · Score: 1

    While it sounds a bit cool to be able to play divx movies on your tv or projector, it's both more aforable and easier to just buy a s-video or d-sub cable. Most new graphics cards come with tv-out and projector usually has a d-sub input. And what about other mpeg 4 formats, like Xvid? Does anybody know if they work on this?

    1. Re:what is the point of this? by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That requires having an ugly, noisy, difficult to use computer next to your TV. Yes ok, it doesn't HAVE to be ugly or noisy or difficult to use. But then again most people don't have the time to build an attractive, silent PC and get the interface working as well as a DVD Player... and then there's the cost of such a project..

    2. Re:what is the point of this? by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      Although, you can play Div-X on a Dreamcast which is probably just as quiet and cheaper!

      Although, OK, you do have to do stuff>/b> so 90% of the population will never get it!

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    3. Re:what is the point of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are actually those of us who like having devices for a certain purpose. Sure you can use a monkey wrench as a hammer, but a real hammer is better. Same thing goes for a Divx/DVD player versus a computer with TV-out.

  21. an ancient acronym by MondoMor · · Score: 3, Informative
    Now if only someone could tell me why they named this thing "Kiss" ...


    Keep it Simple, Stupid. A reminder to yourself that what you're building, designing, etc. should be simple and not unnecessarily complex.

    It's probably as old as FUBAR.

    Just think, when our grandkids are psychic-text messenging each other with "OMG STFU FAG", we'll get to explain it to them.
  22. Re:How is this possible? by rollthelosindice · · Score: 1

    This is pretty confusing. Even for someone like myself who has downloaded the DivX codec and have watched downloaded movies using the codec. I always thought that old rental format was just re-incarnated for another use via file sharing.

  23. Finally.. by pHsHsTK · · Score: 1

    But why would it not support 3.X codec? Much of peoples "collections" would still be in that format.
    Looks like a good solution for those who don't want to put that evil mod chip in ther Xbox.

    1. Re:Finally.. by mr.henry · · Score: 1

      The 3.x codec was a hacked Microsoft codec. The Divx 4 & 5 are legal. I have a binder full of 3.x movies and it kind of sucks that they won't play on any of the new hardware Divx players for legal reasons.

    2. Re:Finally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The 3.x codec was a hacked Microsoft codec. The Divx 4 & 5 are legal. I have a binder full of 3.x movies and it kind of sucks that they won't play on any of the new hardware Divx players for legal reasons.

      No problem. Just turn it into a nice little side project and re-encode all your legally purchased movies in Divx 4 or 5. You did purchase them legally and have the originals right? So what's the big deal? As for the movie pirates, do they really expect our sympathy that their pirated movies won't play on this? Oh, let me guess, it's all Divx 3.x movies you've encoded off the TV right?

    3. Re:Finally.. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Actually what I'm more concerned with is bitrate--I couldn't see in the article if it discussed this. I have a number of (legal) TV encodings in high-quality DivX 5. We're talking roughly 1000kbps. My 1ghz machine stutters when playing them, but I wonder how well this machine would handle it?

    4. Re:Finally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shifting--if you encoded a broadcast, instead of transcoding from another recording, the "original" is only going to be available on a few random days over the next few years.

      Even if you do have the originals, you've still wasted a stack of CD blanks and a hell of a lot of encoder time. Ever have to re-rip your CD collection on changing jobs or something? This is worse.

  24. Re:DivX = MPEG-4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if someone is doubting that people
    who know a little about computers associate
    divx with the compression format.. remember
    that most of the videostuff on p2p is compressed
    with divx (although a lot is done with an older version of divx that does not equal mpeg-4). Download.com shows divx _5.02_ has been
    downloaded 26 million times, and over at
    divx.com (official site), they're claiming total
    figures of 75 million.

    Also, a little while ago, divx 5.03 was released.
    Divx 5 is an mpeg-4 encoder, advanced simple profile.

  25. Already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But its called QCAST
    And it does much more than Divx

    1. Re:Already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... I have this too and it sucks sewer water through a straw! Don't believe this guys bullshit about Qcast. Look at the forums on www.broadq.com if you think that I am the only one with these problems.

      1.) When playing mp3s there is a slight static click when it changes songs. This does not help that nice amp that you just bought.

      2.) Performance sucks. Yes, if you encode your video down to a crappy resolution it will work (but not all of the time). I have been encoding video for a couple of years now and I know what I am doing so don't go there.

      3.) I hope you don't have a new Playstation because the BroadQ doesn't know how to press a CD to save its ass. I have got 2 from them now and they always take mulitple tries to boot. VERY annoying.

      4.) Wow look, Qcast takes your nice DD 5.1 stream and down samples it to stereo! What a piece of shit.

      5.) Oh heavens, not 4000 songs we can't load up that many....hang.

      6.) Fast Forward & Rewind muhahahha, what were you thinking because we certainly were not. Dumb ass engineers that stream the media instead of doing a network filesystem.

      I could go on, but I have wasted enough time on Qcast.

    2. Re:Already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.) When playing mp3s there is a slight static click when it changes songs. This does not help that nice amp that you just bought.

      Haven't noticed this, but then again, I've mostly used it for video.

      2.) Performance sucks. Yes, if you encode your video down to a crappy resolution it will work (but not all of the time). I have been encoding video for a couple of years now and I know what I am doing so don't go there.

      WTF? If you've been doing this for a couple years you've spent a long time doing it wrong. It's played just about everything I've thrown at it. Things encoded with divx 5.02 at about 700 MB/ hour play like a dream.


      3.) I hope you don't have a new Playstation because the BroadQ doesn't know how to press a CD to save its ass. I have got 2 from them now and they always take mulitple tries to boot. VERY annoying.


      Put it back in the cover when you're done so as not to scratch the media :)

      4.) Wow look, Qcast takes your nice DD 5.1 stream and down samples it to stereo! What a piece of shit.

      Haven't noticed this either, most of my stuff is porn or ripped dvd screeners. Not sure it would make much difference.

      5.) Oh heavens, not 4000 songs we can't load up that many....hang.

      This is true It doesn't like too many files in one directory. So, I put my songs in different directoris, a directory per genre or something like that.


      6.) Fast Forward & Rewind muhahahha, what were you thinking because we certainly were not. Dumb ass engineers that stream the media instead of doing a network filesystem.


      This does indeed suck. My only work around has been to break up my video files into smaller chunks so I can sort of move around in a movie.
      In the forums the broadq guys say its the number one priority, so I'm hoping I'll have a fix downloaded soon.

      All in all, its still a really cool product. And since the server can download updates, I'm sure it will continue to get better. Sure its not perfect, but it essentially does what I expected. I'd buy it again.

  26. Formats by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

    DVD, DVD/RW, SVCD, MPEG 4, PictureCD, MP3, and CD RW.

    I begin to get the feeling we'll see hardware decoders supporting AMCF-42* before we get hardware ogg playback...

    * Aunt Marge's Compression Format v. 42

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:Formats by kobotronic · · Score: 1

      Actually, the KiSS player handles OGG just fine.

    2. Re:Formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it does ogg (although it doesn't say that it does, and mislabels it as mp3 while playing).

  27. Too little - too late. by tcdk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It looks a bit better than an xbox, but other than that it does nothing that an xbox with xbmp can't do cheaper.

    My modded xbox with an 120gb hard drive and xbmp has played everything that I've thrown at it (movie wise), including old divx formats that this thing can't handle. Cheaper (Getting MS to subsidize your hardware helps, thanks Bill!).

    --
    TC - My Photos..
    1. Re:Too little - too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be running something different than me. I still have some divx3 avi files that xbmp (cvs 32-01-03) is having a hard time syncing.

      It won't play the latest xvid edcoded files correctly e.g. A Tree of Palme.

    2. Re:Too little - too late. by zsazsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Xbox has two things working against it: the cooling fan and the hard drive. I can hardly stand to use any of the modern game consoles due to the racket that they make. This device is totally fanless and hard driveless. The only moving parts are in the DVD/CD transport.

    3. Re:Too little - too late. by tcdk · · Score: 1

      The hard drive noise isn't to bad with the new fluid baring drives and the fans can be changed (pdf). But you are right, it will never be totally quiet.

      The greatest plus of the xbox is MAME. Galaga is still my favourite game :-).

      --
      TC - My Photos..
    4. Re:Too little - too late. by chazbot · · Score: 1
      It looks a bit better than an xbox, but other than that it does nothing that an xbox with xbmp [xboxmediaplayer.de] can't do cheaper.


      Except play video right out of the box. That's something to which a good number of people will attatch monetary value.

  28. Correction by theridersofrohan · · Score: 1

    Until now, movies in space-saving DivX (MPEG-4) format could only be viewed on a PC

    That's not true. The archos multimedia player can play divx's. Also there are projects for the dreamcast and possibly others that can play divx's

    1. Re:Correction by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      Dreamcast doesn't count; while DivX does build for it, it's not especially high frame rate (~2-3 fps) unless you specially encode the content for it. There are a few people working on XBox projects, though, so..

  29. Not the first by LiENUS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this isnt the first player that could play divx movies on the tv
    its the first player that supports full resolution the sega dreamcast played divx just fine at 320x240 resolution
    even played 3.xx and xvid
    http://www.dcdivx.com

    1. Re:Not the first by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      Nobody's saying this is the first device capable of playing DivX movies on a TV. A PC with TV-out could do that long before dcdivx. What's special about the KISS is that it's a standalone DVD player which also plays MPEG4. You can go to a store and buy it, plug it in and play DivX movies off the shelf. That's what it's first at. I don't get your point.

    2. Re:Not the first by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Idimmu Xul writes "Tom's Hardware has a review of the DP-450: the first player for DivX video in Hi-Fi format! Until now, movies in space-saving DivX (MPEG-4) format could only be viewed on a PC.

    3. Re:Not the first by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Just downloaded this; thanks for the link. My only complaint is that it can't play Quicktime DivX.

      Do you know of any free Dreamcast VCD players? I found one, but it required that I burn the player on the same disc as the VCD -- which is pretty inconvenient.

    4. Re:Not the first by squeakygeek · · Score: 1

      My Archos Multimedia Jukebox 20 plays mp4 divx. You can hook it up to a tv, too.

  30. YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally I can watch all my favourite pr0n on my TV!!!

  31. well, this may be cool by ptrangerv8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it acttually works... Most people I know (that know WHAT divx is) Don't care if they can play the movies on their PS2, Xbox, or DVD player... They play them on their computers... I have a buddy who /koff backs ups /koff his DVD collection - he rips, compresses with Divx, then puts them onto a VCD, or back onto a DVD - what use does this do him? For that matter, if I can buy a DVD burner for ~$400 USD (from Circuit City, no less) that will brn all formats.... Why do I care if I can play DivX discs - I can 'backup' a DVD just like I would a CD... I think it's too little too late... The only great thing I see this being used for is to fit longer movies on a standard 4.7GB disk, and keep the reselution fairly clean... ;beer;

    1. Re:well, this may be cool by GMontag451 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have a DVD Burner, you could put the DivXs on a DVD and have a full season of 30 minute TV episodes all on one disc and still have great quality.

  32. Re:How is this possible? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Divx != DivX;-)

  33. Darn! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    And yesterday i bought a mini-itx board to build my own Freevo box. But in the end i guess i will end up with a better mediahub i guess since my box can play mame games and I can record to HD. I would love to see the player in a small formfactor version since they really don't use much of the case...

    cu,
    Lispy

  34. on the subject of public ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wasnt there a divx that was sort of a licensed cd format? watch the cd x times and its destroyed or locked or something? My vauge memory is that one of the big electronics companies was heavy on it but it required special players and everyone thought it was sucky so it Failed. I get the impression this is different but the name seems the same. Is this a new product or just new packaging for a similar thing?

    1. Re:on the subject of public ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Divx was a Circuit City project exactly as you stated. In 1999 Gej [some French guy] released DiVX ;-), which was pretty much a hack of the Windows Media Mpeg4 codec that allowed you to use the AVI Handler for it. That just means you can use any program that can encode AVI's to encode to the MS Mpeg4 codec.

  35. this is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot is slippen. wtf. old news, news that does not matter.

  36. Incorrect Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is not the first stand alone divx 4 player.

    XBox with a mod chip has been playing these videos for 8 months now.

    1. Re:Incorrect Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is the first LEGAL stand alone divx player

  37. Moderators: Please mod parent up...thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is all!

  38. Re:How is this possible? by rollthelosindice · · Score: 1

    no, I thought it was the same means of video format/compression, not the same means of time expiration. hah ha ha im a clown, ha ha ha, look at my big red nose and big red feet

  39. Price check on Register 1 by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Are the floaters in my eyes getting too big, or did the whole write-up completely fail to give any sort of suggested price for this thing?

  40. Yes and no by Jubii · · Score: 2, Informative

    Circuit city created "a" divx format to go head to head with DVD. However it failed. The name DivX;) was a jab at that failed venture by a group of people that made a video compression scheme. Hence the ";)" that used to adorn the end of the name.

    --

    I planned on inserting something witty here but never got around to it.
    1. Re:Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DivX folks implemented a scheme (which is hard enough by itself) made by the Motion Picture Experts Group.

  41. Will render? by Exiler · · Score: 1

    "Very cool, although it will render my stacks of VCDs obsolete."

    Um, haven't those been obsolete for a few years now? /me sees his 3DO and PSX add-ons to play them

    Nevermind...

    --
    Banaaaana!
  42. Small market by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    This is one of those things that enthusiasts seem to flock to, but will have precious little demand. This may be a great leap forward for everything the RIAA/MPAA hate, but it will make a pretty small difference to Jow Sixpack. I have yet to see a DivX disc for sale at retail.

    It seems that the only real (legal) use for this is being able to write out home videos to CD-R rather than DVD-R. Of course, at the rate DVD-R prices are dropping this won't be an issue by next year. While it's wonderful that all the file-sharers don't have to watch their DivX rips on PC, its going to need a little more market penetration before being considered mainstream.

    Oh, one last beef...Tom's seems to be touting its use on projectors and the unit shows the "progressive" moniker implying it outputs 480p signals. However, it has no component video outputs.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Small market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SCART does component RGB (like YUV but not bandwidth limited), at 576p.

    2. Re:Small market by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      What about 480p? I don't think my TV can do that European 576p format.

      Plus, in the US we don't use SCART connectors. Will the US version have normal YPbPr outputs?

      Too many questions left unanswered...

      -Z

    3. Re:Small market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom is in Europe, so obviously they sent him a Euro box, maybe a version with slightly different connectors will appear in the US, or at least a way of extracting YPbPr from the SCART.

    4. Re:Small market by Taurim · · Score: 1

      No, 480p, 480i, 576p and 576i are possible. Output upto 1600x1200 75 Hz VGA is also available.

  43. Oh no. by Bad_CRC · · Score: 1

    A great majority of the DivX currently available, nearly all of the hundreds I own, are encoded in DivX 3. Very sad news indeed. Guess I'll keep my multimedia PC hooked to my TV afterall.

    Course, that does have the added advantage of keeping well over 150 full length DVD quality movies online and ready to play at anytime thanks to a large hard drive.

  44. DIE cable? by wildzeke · · Score: 1

    What is the DIE cable that connects the drive?

    1. Re:DIE cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are looking at typos, then you should have used "which" instead of "that"

  45. Some other options.... by jacoplane · · Score: 1
  46. This is actually bad. by tempfile · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Products like this continue to discourage the creation of and adherance to standards. If it is possible to just slap a .avi file on the disc and have it (hopefully) (somehow) played on the standalone, and other manufacturers stard implementing this (and they will), everything will lead to a horrendous chaos of incompatibilites.

    It will be the same as with mp3 discs: Does player X support mp3s in subdirectories? Yes, but only without id3 tags, while player Y understands Joliet but no subdirectories and no filename may be longer than 12 characters, etc.

    The implementation of "playing .avi files somehow slapped on a disc" is a BAD THING. They didn't even bother to create some sort of standard. This could have been implemented with glorified SVCDs.

    1. Re:This is actually bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the ability to add a menu to multiple things is very important to me. With a 4.7 GB DVD you could fit 4 high quality films on it, with a menu. That would be awesome. Imagine backing up all Lethal Weapons onto one convenient disc.

  47. It runs Linux! by Taurim · · Score: 5, Informative
    I have my DP-450 since 1 month.

    First of all, this DVD/DivX player runs Linux kernel 2.4.17.
    If you did not believe me, download the ISO containing the firmware upgrade on the Kiss site :

    http://www.kiss-technology.com/support/DRIVERS/450 fw261.zip

    Unzip it, mount the ISO, retrieve the romfs.bin file, mount it and check it's content :

    drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 32 jan 1 1970 bin
    drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 32 jan 1 1970 cdrom
    drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 32 jan 1 1970 dev
    -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 279064 jan 1 1970 fileplayer.bin
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7063 jan 1 1970 fipmodule.o
    drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 32 jan 1 1970 img
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 308894 jan 1 1970 khwl.o
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 310850 jan 1 1970 linux.bin.gz
    -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 114392 jan 1 1970 mpegplayer.bin
    drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 32 jan 1 1970 proc


    zcat linux.bin.gz | strings | grep Linux
    Linux version 2.4.17-uc0 (kiss@localhost.localdomain) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #1 Wed Jan 22 15:30:35 CET 2003

    This player works perfectly with any MPEG-4 file. Mencoder (part of MPlayer) with libavcodec creates files compatible with the DP-450.

    The image quality when playing a DivX (on a Sony 32" 16/9 TV) is FAR superior to the quality of the same file played on a PC hooked to the TV. (I made some comparisons with my Linux PC + NVidia GF4200, S-Video + MPlayer and a friends PC running Windoz + WMP + ATI Radeon card + S-Video link)

    I know there is the 3.11 issue but it's really simple to convert films to MPEG4 to make them compatible with the Kiss player.
    1. Re:It runs Linux! by Junta · · Score: 1

      As exciting as this is, this could mean bad things. Are there GPL violations happening?

      I really have to wonder why a company would release a product like this based on Linux rather than a BSD. Either way there is a significant amount of work to create drivers for the device they choose, but with a BSD they never have to worry about the license.

      I love Linux, but if I had to make a device like this with hardware not yet supported by either codebase to sell to consumers, I would choose BSD and save a legal headache down the road.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:It runs Linux! by Taurim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The embedded CPU in the EM8500 chip is a 150 MHz ARM V4 CPU without MMU. The kernel is name linux-2.4.17-uc0. uc is probably for ucLinux.

      uclinux is a modified Linux Kernel for CPU without MMU :

      http://www.uclinux.org/

      You can also find busybox in the bin directory, a light implementation of a lot of shell utilities :

      http://www.busybox.net/

      bin/init, mpegplayer and fileplayer seems to be entirely specific to kiss (and probably closed source).

    3. Re:It runs Linux! by Taurim · · Score: 1

      binaries in the rom are not in ELF format but in bFTL, Binary Flat Format http://www.beyondlogic.org/uClinux/bflt.htm Another proof that the player runs ucLinux.

    4. Re:It runs Linux! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Please request the source and begin to distribute it. You don't have to distribute it very far, just make sure it's out there.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:It runs Linux! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That is very cool! That means there is no reason (except possibly CPU power) that this player can't work fine forever.

      New video/audio format... cross-compile MPlayer and install it in the firmware.

      Want it to support the new Disc format (eg. DVD+R)... just buy a new IDE drive.

      As soon as I can find someplace to buy one (online or offline) I will.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:It runs Linux! by Taurim · · Score: 1

      Some people tested it With DVD+R and DVD+RW discs and it works. But these days, almost all DVD media and DVD writers I see in the stores are DVD-R(W), not DVD+

  48. Component Output by mattwolfewvu · · Score: 1

    I believe that it can do component output through the SCART out on it's backside. (Second page of the review, picture of the info sticker.)

    --
    "I think that when you become a Republican, you don't get to score any more." -- Butt-head
    1. Re:Component Output by Taurim · · Score: 1

      Yes : RVB and YPrPb, interlaced, progressive scan or VGA.

  49. So many technical flaws.. by Junta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With this review, hard to take them seriously. First they say that it is restricted to PAL or NTSC, and that PAL is 720x576 *dpi*. dpi means dots per inch, drop it because it is wrong, unless you have a 1-cubic-inch pal screen, and the i means 'cubic inch'.....

    Then, correctly notes that 1280x720 and 1920x1080 are supported, but the phrasing seems to suggest that it is being scaled to PAL or NTSC, which is wrong. This is a progressive-scan device, and those are HDTV resolutions. They have already on the second page made a *huge* mistake about a fundamental function of the player.

    And of course I love that the DVD-ROM is connected via a DIE cable... he he... I know, a simple typo, but one with amusing connotations.

    On the subject of the player itself... I'm not so sure it will hit it off with the target audience. Most home users don't care that much about DivX, because making them is very difficult and downloading is hard because it requires too much bandwidth, servers don't give away enough hosting space for movies, and the places where DivX movies can be downloaded are rather intimidating to common users (i.e. IRC). People who do work with such formats frequently are aware of the nature of the media that makes them think twice about dedicated hardware purchases. The formats themselves sometimes change in incompatible ways, and also a format's dominance in tenuous at best. Most are also technical enough to realize that for not much more money they can piece together a decent PC with TV out for not much more that will have faster, general purpose processors that can adapt easy to new formats and new delivery mechanisms. This thing only takes Discs, but many people would prefer to use SMB or NFS... If anything changes, a computer is easy to reconfigure, a set-top box... no....

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:So many technical flaws.. by Taurim · · Score: 1

      The Kiss DP-500 (not yet released outside Denmark) is a DP-450 with an Ethernet 10/100 interface. It will be capable of reading files shared on a network (protocols supported not known yet).

      A future Kiss player will have hard disk+Ethernet.

    2. Re:So many technical flaws.. by GMontag451 · · Score: 1
      hen, correctly notes that 1280x720 and 1920x1080 are supported, but the phrasing seems to suggest that it is being scaled to PAL or NTSC, which is wrong.

      I'm sure it is being scaled - if you are using the composite outputs, which I'm sure they were while testing it. A regular TV is a hell of a lot easier to set up for testing than a big ass widescreen TV.

    3. Re:So many technical flaws.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this post, hard to take him/her seriously. I think you mean 'square inch'... ;-)

      See how easy it is to make mistakes?

    4. Re:So many technical flaws.. by Junta · · Score: 1

      But they said only 'supports' PAL or NTSC... not that it was tested with PAL and NTSC, that is the part that is incorrect and misleading.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:So many technical flaws.. by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. Tom is a complete idiot.

      But back to reality: for not much more money, you will have a PC that has similar capability, but poorer outputs -- oh, and it will look like ABSOLUTE TRASH.

      The most expensive part of taking commodity hardware and making a dedicated device out of it *is the case* -- I want a sleek case that I can mount next to my thousands of dollars of other shiny boxes, not some fucking mini-tower with a neon light hanging out the side. Christ.

      Screw incompatible ways, they could easily make new firmware available off of their website--that you download, burn onto a CD, and stick into your drive. Auto-update. Bingo. Done.

      We need to be encouraging companies that have the balls to take steps like this.

    6. Re:So many technical flaws.. by Junta · · Score: 1

      If you poke around you can find slick cases and barebones kits (like the Shuttle systems). I've seen cases that look similar to the KISS case.

      The problem with the 'firmware updates' is that it can only do so much. When relying on dedicated chips for decoding, those chips do a damn good job at efficiently playing back what they are designed for. As a general purpose processor, it would suck. It might do well against new, but similar codecs, but if a huge new thought of how to compress video comes along, no firmware update in the world could make those dedicated chips play it.

      Yes, a 1.5 GHz system is overkill for movie playback, but it can more easily adapt than a system that requires special hardware to do the hard stuff.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  50. QCast Tuner by citizenc · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    (Disclaimer: I haven't read the linked article) I've been using QCast Tuner for my PS2 for the last week or so and it rocks -- supports lots of file formats too:

    Music

    • MP3
    • S/PDIF (optical output)
    • AC3 (video only)
    • Ogg Vorbis (audio only)

    Video/Movies

    • MPEG-1
    • MPEG-2
    • MPEG-3
    • DivX 3.11
    • DivX 4.x
    • DivX 5.x
    • MS MPEG-4, V3
    • XVID

    Pictures

    • JPEG
    • PNG
    Yes, it runs on Linux. Check it out. =)
    1. Re:QCast Tuner by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as MPEG-3.

    2. Re:QCast Tuner by citizenc · · Score: 1

      That's the list from the QCast Tuner site... *Shrug*

    3. Re:QCast Tuner by Digypro · · Score: 1

      I just went to the site, and it wasn't on the list! typo!

  51. Re:DivX = MPEG-4? by El_Nofx · · Score: 1

    Divx is a variant of MPEG 4 from what I understand, just like Xvid is. They are both based on a standard. They talk about it in the FAQ's on their site.

    (from their site)
    Q: What video codecs are supported by KiSS DP-450 ?

    A: All video codecs that comply with the specifications of ISO-MPEG4 - Advanced, Simple Profile, are supported by the DP-450. DivX 4.x and 5.x comply with this standard, exept DivX 5.02 features- GMC (Global Motion Compensation) and QP (Quarter Pexel) which are Advanced, Advanced Profile features.

    What seems nice is that if someone comes out with a newer version of xvid and or divx all you need to do is update your fireware and they claim they will stay on top of that.

    There is even a region free firmware someone wrote for this thing here.
    http://www.firmware-flash.com/~hijacker/kis s/

    I went hog wild over this when I first heard about it but the price is a little too steep, $400. Just wait about 6 months to a year and every set top box will be shipping with an mpeg 4 decoder, just like MP3.

    --
    It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
  52. Is GMC and QPEL that hard in hardware? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You gotta wonder, because even for their next-gen, HDTV-capable chips, it still says:

    MPEG-1, MPEG-2 MP@HL and MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile Level 5* video decoding. * without support global motion compensation (GMC)

    Sounds really silly to me to not fully supporting the standard... they're like _this_ close, and you know that many users will have problems with the rips they have *cough* obtained *cough*, because it has the wrong encoding settings. Fair enough that there are other formats on the horizon (mpeg4 AVC, wm10+, realcrap) but GMC is here today, and the mpeg4 ASP profile isn't exactly brand new. Is it that hard to support? Or is there some other reason?

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Is GMC and QPEL that hard in hardware? by number · · Score: 2, Informative

      Support for full GMC is quite complex (and potentially *extremely* computationally expensive), and I'm guessing that's why support isn't included. QPel is quite simple, it's just a different interpolation filter.

      DivX 5.x doesn't encode with the full range of options that GMC allows however (only uses 1 warping point), and is therefore quite simple to decode. I suppose they could have included that quite easily, but decided to pass on it since it would only be implementing "half a feature."

    2. Re:Is GMC and QPEL that hard in hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI & FWIW:

      QPel is ok to do because it just double the complexity. So you need more power in your hardware. And as a proff you can look at Sigma Design EM8600 chip which seems to support Qpel (but still not GMC).

      For GMC the complexity bound is extremely large. With Mpeg2 or 4 without GMC, you predict one Macroblock from at most another macroblock. So to decode one macroblock. When you use GMC, you may need a whole frame to predict any macroblock. For example if you have a scene zooming out, the first frame is the reference. When you have zoomed out enough the whole picture fits in one macroblock, and to calculate that macroblock you need to acces the whole reference frame. This may not require a lot processing power (althought i guess if you add some spining or warping to the zoom it could be) but it requires a lot of memory bandwith.

      However it's probable that the way the divx codec implement GMC may not induce that much complexity, but there's no spec, nor profiles, about how much complexity a codec can add when doing GMC. SO when you're doing the hardware you better have to support the worst case or not do it at all....In that case the worst case is just to expensive for dedicated hardware. But it's not when you're hardware is designed to run Games that need extreme amount of CPU and memory bandwith (your p4 your ps2 or your xbox)

      By comparison, H264 aka mpeg4 part 10, will have 1/8pel but no GMC at all. You've got to see that MPEG is rather computer oriented. ITU (which approv the H26x standards) in comparison is much more Consummer oriented. You've H262 (wich is also Mpeg2 ) in DVDs, H263 for video-phones, and sonn H264 for HD-DVD (i predict)....

  53. is this like DivX players from the 90's? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    how does this compare to those? Is it not the same compression? A friend had one, and i kind of remember the angle being that you bought a movie for, say $3, and could watch it a lot for maybe 2 weeks, then the player locked it out unless you got an access code to "buy" the movie. The player hooked to a phone line and would charge your account i guess. I remember rental stores having the media, but i guess it never did too well. I remember the concept and business model (sort of) but not the technology inside it. anyone?

    1. Re:is this like DivX players from the 90's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please take the time to read the article next time before posting.

    2. Re:is this like DivX players from the 90's? by barureddy · · Score: 1

      A.K.A. NO.

    3. Re:is this like DivX players from the 90's? by waferhead · · Score: 1

      Almost the opposite...

      There is no relation, the names are a coincidence, or perhaps the later naming is mockery of the earlier disaster

      Look at http://www.divx.com/ for some background.

      Google.com can fill in the rest.

  54. All this is available on the PS2 WITHOUT any mods by specialized_sworks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a quick note about the review of the standalone DIVX player... I hope
    he realized when he wrote that article that there exists a DIVX player for
    the Playstation2? This is a real player... no mods, no hacks to perform.
    Just buy the software and play.

    It takes advantage of the Sony network adapter for the PS2. I know a lot of
    people got these for christmas, so there is no additional cost above the
    cost of the software. The system uses a very little cpu consuming program on
    the PC to stream the data to the PS2. The PS2 does the decoding in many
    different formats, and is kept up to date automatically by the PC.

    The best part is that you do not have to burn CD/DVD to get them to play.
    You just stream them right off the PC.

    Check it out... http://www.broadq.com

  55. XVid has one MAJOR weakness by Daath · · Score: 1

    As it says on the lastest news on the front page:
    You may have noticed it, XVID has moved its downloads (which are source codes only, you won't find binaries on our pages, or DLLs, or installers, or ...) - That's right. It's only for really cool people who can compile stuff. And you know, that is actually very few people on Windows...

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:XVid has one MAJOR weakness by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And you know, that is actually very few people on Windows...

      Well, some of the people who can do so are sharing their work.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    2. Re:XVid has one MAJOR weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      durrr... google for "xvid binaries" drrr...

      or do what i did and find the xvid irc channel, then go bug the dev's to give me a binary link ;p

    3. Re:XVid has one MAJOR weakness by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Please mod this parent post up... Xvid is much better than divx

  56. divx isnt good quality. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    Most divx movies aren't good quality. As cool as it would be to have a divx player, I prefer vcd since it generally looks better. Overall picture quality with a vcd might be comparible to vhs instead of dvd, but divx movies tend to have horrible artifacting which makes them annoying to watch. The nature of divx compression makes it so that artifacting is a way of life, and that is just unacceptible for me.

    1. Re:divx isnt good quality. by Junta · · Score: 1

      No, this is simply wrong.

      The divx movies you may download can really suck ass. The same is true of MPEG-1 (the tech behind VCDS). If you get MPEG-1 up to VCD bitrates, the quality becomes 'acceptable', but frequently you are left with blocky artifacts (*especially* when there is Text overlayed on the image encoded with the Video as is the case with credits and subtitles).

      DIVX encoded at the same bitrate as VCDs are really blow VCD away. Much fewer artifacts, text does not distort background, etc. Try breaking out mencoder (or whatever the tool of the day is in Windows today) and making your own samples from DVDs, using the same bitrate for your MPG and DivX output. The results will be crystal clear.

      As an aside, my favorite format is .ogm with MPEG-4 (Whether it be DivX or whatever) video, vorbis audio, and a text stream if subtitles are needed. I really wish this sort of format would become more prominent.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:divx isnt good quality. by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

      That is not correct.

      VCDs like DivX are both based on MPEG compression. VCDs are fixed at a CBR of 1150kbs at 352x240. DivX is more flexible and you can see a variety of resolutions, bit rates, and audio codecs (and bit-rates) used. This means that there can be a wide range in the quality.

      Assuming someone has done a decent job encoding, a DivX movie of the same size will look tremendously better than a VCD.

      Is it surprising that a newer codec that represents who-knows-how-many man-months of effort has managed to improve on MPEG1? I hope not...

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
    3. Re:divx isnt good quality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "99% of EVERYTHING is crap" - Theodore Strugeon. But the massive collection of Divx CD that I encode myself are awesome!

      The trouble is that I only put 30-40 minutes per CD. So, my standabone Divx player needs to be a changer - a five disc changer would be fine for 99% of most movies. A 100 disc changer would better, so that I load all of Neon Genesis Evangelion, Cowboy Bebop, and Bubblegum Crisis 2040 at once!

    4. Re:divx isnt good quality. by Taurim · · Score: 1

      With the DP-450, you can store your DivX on CD-R, 4200 GB usable (not 4.7), this is 6*700 MB CD.

    5. Re:divx isnt good quality. by sixide · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ (like the others). VCD is 1150Kbps at 352x240 with 23.976fps. This equates to a Bits/(Pixels x Frames) of 0.568. A well-encoded DivX 2-CD rip (most movies are 2 CDs for VCD) will have a ratio of around 0.384 with AC3 (much superior to VCD audio), and will look far better, indistinguishable from DVD, unless you use a computer monitor and specifically look for discrepancies. I'd hate to see the DivXes you've seen, they sound abysmal.

    6. Re:divx isnt good quality. by jedrek · · Score: 1

      I'll fess up: I only download group DVD releases. Those releases are actually held up to certain standards that define acceptible levels of compression, resolution, etc. I rarely get a movie where the quality is *anywhere* near VHS, it's usually equal to DVD or just shy.

    7. Re:divx isnt good quality. by jedrek · · Score: 1
  57. ethernet please by shokk · · Score: 1

    I'd rather not get into flipping disks to watch movies now that I'm on TiVo and Audiotron for other entertainment, so their DP-500 model with ethernet jack is more interesting:

    http://www.kiss-technology.com/projects/dvd_500. as p

    I wonder how DivX quality compares to progressive scan DVDs.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  58. Patent Issues? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    MPEG-4 is a highly patented 'standard'. As soon as the MPEG-LA finalises the license terms for these patents, they're going to start charging people. DivX is a codec which infringes (almost certainly) these patents, as is XviD. Unlike DivX ;-), the newer versions of DivX are not ripped-off microsoft code, so are actually legal from a copyright standpoint, if not a patent. What's going to happen to DivX Networks when they get hit with a $2 free for every copy of an MPEG-4 encoder they've distributed? What about the company making this hardware player? Do they have a license to make such a decoder?
    As far as I know, the only currently legal MPEG-4 codec is Apple Quicktime 6.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  59. How about... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  60. Hardware may be the wrong approach by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

    I think that the Xboxmediaplayer (www.xboxmediaplayer.de) project for the Xbox is a much smarter implementation.

    DivX is releasing new versions of their codecs that have new features. Unless a hardware player has some very easy way to update it's software (i.e. a network port and a TCP/IP stack, etc), it can easily become outdated.

    While mod'ing an X-box may currently be too scary for most people (BTW -- it can now be done w/o having to make a single solder connection), for geeks at least (and lets face it -- who else wants a DivX DVD player), an Xbox (or for the very enterprising a home built computer in a small case) is probably the best bet.

    My Xbox BTW will play almost all formats and stream them over the network from my SMB file shares.

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
    1. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      The Kiss player runs Linux (see my other posts) and is easily upgradable.

    2. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by haggar · · Score: 1

      OK, if it runs Linux (I am not doubting it), where is the CPU? Looking at that motherboard, it doesn't seem to have any CPU capable of running Linux... unless it's on the opposite side. Do you know anything about this?

      Another thing: do you know if I can swap the CD ROM device that is in the KiSS, with another (standard) IDE CD ROM?

      --
      Sigged!
    3. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      The 150 MHz ARM Risc CPU is embedded in the EM8500 chip along with everything else except Flash and Ram. (i.e. memory controler, IDE controler, video, decoders, I/O...)

    4. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by haggar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I noticed that shortly after I posted that..

      Do you think I could swap the CD ROM drive with any standard IDE CD ROM? If yes, do you think if it matters whether it has region-blocked firmware or not?

      --
      Sigged!
    5. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      Swapping the DVD, I don't know. Some people in DP-450 forums say it works... The integrated Toshiba DVD Player is quite excellent at reading any media : DVD-/+R(W), CD-R(W) and scratched CDs. I don't understand why you would want to replace it (exect for failure). To make the DP-450 region free, you have to flash the firmware of the integrated Toshiba IDE drive to make it region Free. To do that, you have to connect it to a PC and flash it with modified firmware easy to find. The DP-450 software detects it and gives you acces to an additional menu where you can choose the zone or no zone.

    6. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by haggar · · Score: 1

      Because, for example:
      1. If it breaks, I can easily fix it.
      2. I have tried some KiSS models before, and it always was the case that the DVD would overheat, after an hour. When I would pop out the DVD after watching a movie, it was worryingly hot. I decided not to put up with that and I have now a Philips DVD player. But I would consider a new one, to play SVCD.
      3. I already have a region-lock-free DVD ROM, which I don't use to watch movies, so why not just swap it with the one in the KiSS. OK, not a strong argument, but ir reinforces the previous too, a bit.

      --
      Sigged!
    7. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      The Toshiba drive in the DP-450 stay very cold, like the entire case of this DVD player. I had a Tokai 715S before the DP-450 and it was a lot more hot. For the internal drive problems, all the problems in CD and DVD players I have seen were caused by dust on the laser lens. It's relatively easy to clean but not a well known trick to repair players.

    8. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by haggar · · Score: 1

      Do you mean, cleaning with one of those cleaning kits/discs? Or do you know of some special trick, that requires disassembling the drive and the optics?

      --
      Sigged!
    9. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      The CD cleaning kits are complete bullshit and totally useless.

      I partially disassemble the top of the CD drive and I CAREFULLY clean the lens using a lens cleaning brush (the kind of brush you use to clean camera lenses).

    10. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by haggar · · Score: 1

      I think you're right about the kits. It occured to me that this is just a huge scum that has never passed the test of actual measuring and checking. People buy it and use it to have a peace of mind, but it never worked, for me. Any CD drive that would not work with most of the CDs, after the cleaning with a kit like this, will still NOT read most of the CDs.

      I wonder if a good compressed air pistol wouldn't be better than a brush, though.

      --
      Sigged!
    11. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      Compressed air pistol ?! Ave you ever seen a flying laser head ? :-) You should really avoid that ! When I say "carefully...", I mean it. The head on the CD arm seems to be very fragile. I just used a small brush to remove dust on the lens (by gently touching the lens with a small part of the brush) until it seems clean.

    12. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by haggar · · Score: 1

      Compressed air is very delicate and it's widely used for cleaning precise machinery such as watches and robotic engines. I really think you should take it into consideration.

      But now that you ask, no I have not yet seen a flying laser head :o)

      Anyway, what shall we do, buy this baby or not? I am a bit unsure about the brand - KiSS did prove to be, at least with me, a bad brand through and through, in the past. I even had one model (forgot the exact number) with me for a week of testing, and it didn't pass.

      Now, this one seems to be composed of good parts, at least. There doesn't seem to be any reason to think it wouldn't deliver acceptable quality and durability.

      Ummm.. one thing we didn't talk about... Macrovision! I like it off, but with this model it might prove to be a tough nut to crack, as it's impemented in the decoder ASIC.

      --
      Sigged!
    13. Re:Hardware may be the wrong approach by Taurim · · Score: 1

      I own a Kiss DP-450 (see my others posts) and it is really and excellent drive.

      Macrovision is set in software. With Firmware 2.5.1 and and internal region free IDE DVD, Macrovision is automatically set to off.

      Unfortunately, this is not true anymore with the latest 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 firmwares.

      I don't really care with Macrovision. Why would I need to copy a DVD or Divx to a VCR, all the people I know have their PC hooked to the TV :-)

  61. mod parent down - troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy has no idea what the hell he's talking about, or he's just trying to rile people up.

  62. he's always trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at his post list. Fairly illuminating, yes?

  63. PARENT CONTAINS A GOATSEX LINK!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLEASE MOD DOWN ACCORDINGLY K THX BYE!

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  64. Tom! I'm disappointed! DOLBY != DTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    On the first page the caption from the image says

    Audio CDs and DVDs with Dolby DTS coding can be played back in just the same way with the KiSS Player, as long as an appropriate decoder is connected to the digital output.

    Dolby DTS is not a codec or a standard. Dolby Digital and Digital Theatre Sound are completely different surround formats!

    FOR SHAME!
  65. A few things I'd like to see by Gumber · · Score: 1

    1. Component video Out.
    2. Some ability to access networked content, perhaps by supporting a few low-priced USB wired & wireless ethernet adapters. It seems that the main market for this is geeks and this geek doesn't want to burn a bunch of disks just to watch stuff on TV.

    If I did, I'd be watching stuff on my 27" TV rather than my 19" monitor.

    1. Re:A few things I'd like to see by Taurim · · Score: 1

      The Kiss have Composite, S-Video, RGB and YPrPb video out (via the SCART connector for RGB an Component video). You can configure it for progressive scan or RGB output. The soon to be released Kiss DP-500 (already available in Denmark) have an Ethernet port.

  66. Clueless! by badasscat · · Score: 1

    I stopped reading this "review" as soon as I read this right at the top of the first page:

    "Audio CDs and DVDs with Dolby DTS coding can be played back in just the same way with the KiSS Player, as long as an appropriate decoder is connected to the digital output."

    There are so many things wrong with that one sentence I don't even know where to begin. For one thing, there is no such thing as "Dolby DTS" - in fact, it says "Dolby Digital" right in the screenshot above this caption. Dolby Digital and DTS are two separate, competing encoding formats. For another, the way this is written seems like he's talking about both DVD's and Audio CD's with "Dolby DTS", which seems too dumb to even contemplate but given the previous mistake you never know. He could be talking about DVD Audio, which doesn't use either standard DTS or Dolby Digital, but which is full surround.

    Tom's has been going downhill for a while now, and it's obvious from this one sentence that whoever wrote this review has absolutely no idea what he's talking about and probably very little idea how to write either. It's pointless reading a review of a piece of electronics gear when the reviewer is not even familiar with the underlying technology.

    1. Re:Clueless! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Err..umm..you are aware that you can, in fact, get CDs which are dts encoded, yes? So long as your CD player has a digital out, they play quite nicely.

      http://www.digitaleyes.net/dtscd.cfm if you'd care to purchase some.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  67. divx DivX ;-) by djace · · Score: 1

    http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#2.10

  68. Flashable? by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Having flashable firmware means it'll be a week before some geek fixes it.

    No?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  69. Pictures of the Kiss-DP 500 with Ethernet 10/100 by Taurim · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Look at the pictures of the latest Kiss DP-500, similar to DP-450 but with 10/100 Ethernet :

    http://dtouton.free.fr/DP500/DP500arriere1.jpg
    http://dtouton.free.fr/DP500/DP500arriere2.jpg
    ht tp://dtouton.free.fr/DP500/EM8550.jpg

  70. Linux Media Center. by jfisherwa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As has been pointed out, this thing does run Linux.. It also has a REALmagic EM8500 onboard.

    And that the DVD-ROM is connected via the IDE port?

    I would put my money that the set of pins on the side of the board are for a standard PC/104 riser card (i.e. ethernet) -- not to mention the serial port that is internal to the box.

    *THIS* is a perfect starting point for the "Linux Media Center." Why not add ethernet.. and another HD?

    Unless it does this already (I didn't read the review, I hate Tom. I just look at pretty pictures.) - This thing is just waiting for transcode and some other software to be scripted together--stick a normal DVD in the drive, press a button on your remote control--bingo. DVD -> DIVX, stored on the internal HD, accessible via the network.

    I would love a box like this with a HD added, connected to a P2P network. Search, download, right to the box. Oh, and replace DVD-ROM with DVD-RW; all of my friends will want copies of the movies I've stolen--or purchased if the MPAA gets their shit together. :P

  71. Upcoming Divx Players by ToKsUri · · Score: 1
    This device is great! It's not excesively expensive and the most important thing, it is the first and by the moment the _ONLY_ divx home player available.

    However, there will be many models coming soon this upcoming years. Just to take note, Texas Instruments, Philips, and Equator Technologies have DivX certification, which means they will hopefully release soon their own players.

    When Philips has his own DivX player in the shops, dont wait until Sony, Samsung, Jvc, etc etc etc have their own! Its the mp3 player story repeated. The following model will be better than the precedeeing, as is usual in this market. We are witnessing an important act here.

    By the way... what will sony do? Their hardware department WILL NEED to sell DivX players to stay in market, however their content department (Movies, music and so) will clearly see the proliferation of DivX players as a threat. Interresting.

    for further information on the different Divx Certifications take a look here: DivX certification

  72. The gamecube SDK information by ToKsUri · · Score: 1

    I think that the comment could lead to some misunderstanding. There is truly a Divx SDK for gamecube however, the use of it is not for gamecube users to burn and watch their own dowloaded divx files in your gamecube (as the Kiss player does). Several people have told me this would be possible to do with the gamecube, but as can be read in the official announcement this is not the real fact. It is known that Gamecube uses miniDVDs which have less capacity that normal dvds, still enough for actual games. By compressing games video files with divx, the game developers will save large amounts of space and still be able to deliver high quality video.

  73. I was just at WalMart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they've got like 400 DVD players made by APEX on sale for $100 (that's a C Note for you musical policemen). Will they play this new format?

  74. Upcoming Divx Players by ToKsUri · · Score: 1

    This device is great! It's not excesively expensive and the most important thing, it is the first and by the moment the _ONLY_ divx home player available. However, there will be many models coming soon this upcoming years. Just to take note, Texas Instruments, Philips, and Equator Technologies have DivX certification, which means they will hopefully release soon their own players. When Philips has his own DivX player in the shops, dont wait until Sony, Samsung, Jvc, etc etc etc have their own! Its the mp3 player story repeated. The following model will be better than the precedeeing, as is usual in this market. We are witnessing an important act here. By the way... what will sony do? Their hardware department WILL NEED to sell DivX players to stay in market, however their content department (Movies, music and so) will clearly see the proliferation of DivX players as a threat. Interresting. for further information on the different Divx Certifications take a look here: DivX certification [divxnetworks.com]

  75. your comment isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    clearly visible. mpeg-4 will hide the tiling better, but lose some detail.


    So, basically, the new format just blurs the sharp edges around the pixel.


    Wunnerful. Maybe the folks with an old 19" TV will not notice, but the trendsetters who sprung for a 1080 progressive aren't going to like this amymore than if they had to go back to vinyl for their music.

    1. Re:your comment isn't by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      If you read the rest of my comment you'd understand that at the same bitrate mpeg-4 looks better than VCD. A VCD holds 1 hour of video. A mpeg-4 CD holds 2 hours of video at equal or slightly better quality. A 1 hour mpeg-4 CD looks even better than a 30 minute SVCD.

  76. Sigma Designs again by jeroen94704 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note that this player is powered by the Sigma Designs EM8500 chip.

    Apart from the issue some people may have with SD (They were the ones who stole some Open Source code from the XVid project), this is the same chip that powers this company's XCard DVD/DivX PC-card.

    I own one of these XCards and have basically given up on using it for DivX playback. It's works great for DVD, and the image quality is much better than their older Hollywood Plus, but DivX playback is just terrible.

    Among other issues, the the XCard does not support DivX 3.11 and some advanced features from DivX 5. More seriously, even a theoretically compatible DivX movie is often unwatchable because of Jerky playback. This is partly due to poor support for VBR audio, but there also seems to be an issue with the frame-rate: It seems to use 30 fps, instead of 29.970. Small difference, but enough to be clearly noticable. Oh, and did I mention their software is quite buggy and unstable (Yes, this includes the driver)?

    In short, this is potentially a nice product, but definitely something I want to have reviewed THOROUGHLY, using a lot of different movies and encodings, before I trust it.

    --
    He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
  77. Re:How is this possible? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

    Some folks are kind enough to help us see that distinction by refering to it at DivX ;-)

    DivX ;-) only refers to DivX 3.11, which this box won't play. So that doesn't help at all...

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
  78. SOLUTION Re:subject by Ubi_NL · · Score: 1

    On the remote press
    CLEAR 2 7 6
    it'll bring you into a menu where you can turn off region coding

    --

    If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
  79. Can't play copy protected audio CDs by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    Yet another victim of this protection. I wonder when are people going to write firmware upgrades which will take care of this problem?

    Please respond!

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
    1. Re:Can't play copy protected audio CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never.

      Audio protected CD are designed to screw up IDE drives.

  80. Funny -- by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    Does anybody remember when DivX was the "alternative format" for DVDs? The players were supposed to only allow people to play the movies if they paid to have the keys?

    That form of DivX was, I think, the first real attempt the industry made towards DRM, though it's horrible failure caused it to die a welcomed death. If this current day DivX is based on the same format, I find it a sweet irony that it's now the format of choice for those who trade video (notice I didn't say people who pirate, even though they love this format, too).

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  81. After much thought, I dropped it by KlausBreuer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, in November 2002 I wanted to buy one of these things for my parents. Thus I spent a lot of time finding data on this KISS player.

    After a lot of back and forth, I decided not to buy it for the following reasons:

    * Price. In Germany, this thing costs about $400. That's harsh, especially compared to the bone-standard DVD player I bought in the end for $88.

    * It doesn't play Advanced DivX (Quarter Pixel, GMC). While I can do without GMC (it looks weird in places), I use QP all the time.

    * The FAQ clearly stated that you will never, ever, be able to disable the region code and the Macrovision 'protection'. I can live with the region code limitation (while grinding my teeth), but my parents TV cannot handle this Macrovision nonsense (and no, we won't buy a new TV just for DVDs).
    While I can buy a hardware scrubber for the Macrovision, it would have put be back another $60.

    * The button design on the box itself is simply lousy. All buttons are in a neat row and look quite identical. Good luck using it in the half-dark.

    I'm now fiddling with putting together a Linux PC in a tiny case, which will play whatever I put into the DVD drive. I'm still looking for a *quiet* case, though...

    Ciao,
    Klaus

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    1. Re:After much thought, I dropped it by haggar · · Score: 1

      Klaus, I am in Finland, but my wife goes to Germany often: where can you find a Macrovision-removing device in Germany, for 60 Euro? I would need one, possibly with NTSC support (but PAL is more important).

      Thank you in advance.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:After much thought, I dropped it by Taurim · · Score: 1

      My Kiss DP-450 is Region Free and I dont care about Macrovision.

    3. Re:After much thought, I dropped it by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Hi Haggar (Hägar?),

      have a look at 'Conrad Electronics'. It's a massive electronics place with outlets in every major city, and they have *everything* ;)

      Ciao,
      Klaus

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  82. What crack are you smoking? by rsborg · · Score: 1
    If it is possible to just slap a .avi file on the disc and have it (hopefully) (somehow) played on the standalone, and other manufacturers stard implementing this (and they will), everything will lead to a horrendous chaos of incompatibilites.

    First, I'd like you to take a stab at the real standard that's being supported: MPEG4. Please note: This encompasses DivX (4.x+.. ie, all the legal versions), XviD, .mp4 files, and theoretically Quicktime 6. MPEG4 is bigger than DivX, and I'd say that this is not a fully compaitble DivX player anyway, since it doesn't play the hacked 3.11 version.

    So how the hell is this bad for standards?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:What crack are you smoking? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      This is bad for standards because there is actually no standard. You just burn a CD-ROM with a bunch of files (MPG,MP3,AVIs...) on it and it will just magically work, truncate names, don't display subdirs ... Like the MP3-CD-Players do today.

      That is actually the reason I like VCD-SVCD discs. You may not get optimal video quality but at least you have a standard to burn your CD! You can specify what Next-Previous-Menu keys are doing, you can define menus, slideshows (with real pictures, not a movie of a slideshow), subtitles, multi-channel soundtracks, several soundtracks... Possibilities are so much higher!

      Even though most of the current SVCD players doesn't understand half the specs...

      My $.02

  83. Not the first player by jridley · · Score: 1

    You mean, the first DivX player other than the Archos MP3 player. The new version has a color LCD screen and video out, and can play DivX to a TV. The Archos is in major retailers now; a guy at work has one though I haven't played with it yet.

  84. But you had to know that was coming... by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    ...it will render my stacks of VCDs obsolete...

    I think most of us were hoping for and counting on this being the case at some point anyway. As convenient as VCDs have been, it has been obvious that they are only a short-term solution while better technologies are being developed.... as... is... everything else.

  85. Stupid. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    [rant] Really, the age of standalone media players are OVER, people.

    Just get a video card with TV ($30).

    If closeness is an issue, get a wireless keyboard mouse ($100 Logitec) and/or an infrared receiver ($30 @ www.irman.com).

    Buying a separate standalone player is stupid. All standalone players break. I have owned 6 VCRs, 4 cd players, and 3 stereos in the past 15 years. Everything breaks. And the more stuff you have, the more often something is in repair.

    But we're slashdot readers right? We're all guaranteed to always have a suitable computer for the rest of our lives, right? Then why spend additional money for more redundant hardware? Computers are easier to repair too.

    There is no point in owning a cd player or VCR. Hell, my computer can record a tv show while simultaneously pumping music to every room in the house without a glitch. (While also compressing video in the background and downloading from newsgroups.) And it's only 900mHz with 256M ram. Imagine what people with a real comuter can do.

    Give it up. The standalone player days are over. [/rant]

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:Stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly true, though I'm not prepared to throw out my stack of VHS tapes, nor will all the movies I'll ever want to rent ever be (re)released on DVD. And I've never seen a DVD/CD-ROM changer that stored more than maybe four discs.

    2. Re:Stupid. by Sotto_Zero · · Score: 1

      Jeez. I guess this guy's computer is the only one on Earth that doesn't "break". Maybe he vents all his fury on his standalone players. :P

      --

      --- Surfing the web on my ZX-81.
    3. Re:Stupid. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      True, true. Throwing out VHS would be bad. I've been converting mine to AVI but after creating 300G of AVIs I have barely dented my VHS collection. But.. If you go and re-watch your VHS tapes.. that is a perfect time to convert them to AVI. Just get an ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon TV Card, and SB Live Platinum or other soundcard with *RCA AUDIO INPUTS*, a Ground Loop Buzz Isolator from RadioShack, and virtualdub from www.virtualdub.com .....

      And yes, lots of stuff does not get released to DVD. But alot of it is released to AVI on the internet. :)

      And what you mention about a DVD changer not storing more than 4 discs speaks to what I am saying -- on a harddrive you have no limits other than space. (Though, I should add, there ARE standalone 200 dvd changers. But they will break. I've never seen a 200-anything changer last more than 5 years.)

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    4. Re:Stupid. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Everything breaks. A computer is easier to fix than a DVD player or CD player. It's something I can do myself! :)

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  86. Re:How is this possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Circuit City's Divx was encrypted MPEG-2 (standard DVD video format) with proprietary players that restricted use. This DivX is a codec for a certain profile of MPEG-4 (offering significantly better compression).

  87. Users dont care about standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...They want to play what they downloaded .-

    So users are bad for standards, thats right. And Divx is bad for standard.

  88. So does this box REALLY play MPEG-4? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Or does it only play DivX, i.e. MPEG-4 encoding in a non-standard AVI file?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  89. Re:It's all MPEG-4 by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "What are you talking about? DivX, XviD and ffmpeg are all creating MPEG-4 spec-compliant video streams. As far as the decoder can see, streams created by any of them were created by the same encoder."

    So, honestly wondering, why can't it play DivX 3.x format? Many of my discs are in 3.x, and if there's a way to make them playable on this player, that would be fantastic. Are there any tools that cleanly seperate the MPEG-4 stream from an AVI, which ostensibly should work for all DivXs, including 3.x? Of course, one can convert an AVI to mpeg-4, but that involves dirty decomp-recomp, and that's the LAST ditch option. Anybody?

  90. Re:Can't play copy protected audio CDs [ac reply] by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    Hello AC.

    As I wrote before, in order to circumvent that problem, the drive's firmware has to use the following logic:

    if (cd is printed) and (cd is audio_cd) then read_only_the_first_session

    This will take care of the problem of the additional confusing sessions which get naturally ignored by normal CD players. One minor problem is that you won't be able to view the data in mixed audio+data CDs (like in the 2nd installation disc of the game Nobody Lives Forever), so it's best to apply this theoretical firmware upgrade only when you have more than one CD drive.

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
  91. Re:It's all MPEG-4 by number · · Score: 1

    The DivX 3.11 "format" is just a hack of Microsoft's old MSMPEG4V3 codec - it is similar to MPEG-4, but the bitstream format is different (more limited, missing many features, different huffman codes).

    I am working on a tool that can losslessly convert a DivX 3.11 AVI into an MPEG-4 stream. The resulting MPEG-4 stream will be larger than the original, since the codebooks aren't optimal anymore, but the conversion will be quick and visually identical. This is possible due to the fact that motion vector resolution, block sizes, quantizers, etc. are identical between the formats, they're just written differently.

  92. DCDivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure you have been able to play DivX movies on the Dreamcast for a year now.

  93. Re:It's all MPEG-4 by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    Well, if you need beta testers or purchasers, let me know :)

  94. Re:Can't play copy protected audio CDs [ac reply] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never.
    jews like you aren't capable of making rational decisions.