Slashdot Mirror


Digital Celebrities

partridge writes "Carson Daly's simulacrum is the new Max Headroom. I guess this makes Clear Channel Communications the current embodiment of Network 23? Now we just have to wait for the blipverts to start making consumer's heads explode."

291 comments

  1. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bwahahaha. You don't know what Max Headroom is?!?! Go play with your tinker toys...

  2. Blipverts? by giel · · Score: 1

    Blipverts? Exploding heads? Makes me think of stuff like David Cronenberg's Videodrome...

    --
    giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
    1. Re:Blipverts? by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      Scanners, anyone?

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
  3. Translation by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 5, Informative
    Max Headroom was a television show from the 80's [I believe, I could be off with the period.]. The character named Max Headroom was completely computer generated and the evil corporation of the show was Network 23. english translation complete.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Translation by illogical_simby · · Score: 0

      Max Headroom is a porn star.

      --
      Apparently my appendage goes here
    2. Re:Translation by Eravau · · Score: 1

      Yep, it was 80's...around 1985 - 1987. You can get more info from The Internet Movie Database , of course.

  4. Re:Wha? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Old, amazingly well-done (for the time period, and medium)cyberpunk show. Main character, a reporter, had an artificial simulacrum named Max Headroom. Worked for network 23. The network created high-energy bursts of commercials that would occasionally cause people's heads to blow up. Reporter investigated. Etc.

  5. simula- wha? by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 2, Funny

    *runs to the nearest thesaurus*

    1. Re:simula- wha? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simalcrum: from the D&D spell (and maybe from wherever that came from.)

      In AD&D, a "Simalcrum" was a lesser form of a "clone", made of snow & ice and a bit of the caster's flesh.

      I'm sure that there's a bigger Sci Fi reference, but I wager that most of /. (and a good portion of the net) gets the vocabulary from AD&D.

      And on that note--why doens't the Jargon File mention RPGs? AD&D Trolls are most vulnerable to fire--which has always struck me as the most likely reason why "Trolls" are attacked by "flames." (I think "flame" came first, and "troll" came second.)

    2. Re:simula- wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...

      I think "troll" alludes to the fishing method, not the bridge-dwelling creatures. The idea is to drag a lure or bait (i.e., a provocative statement) through a fishy-looking spot (i.e., a newsgroup or forum) to see how many suckers take the bait.

      Likewise, I doubt "flame" had it orgin in D & D either.

    3. Re:simula- wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don't trolls hide under bridges waiting to waylay goats?

    4. Re:simula- wha? by trentfoley · · Score: 1
      Or, maybe its this word from Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

      Simulacrum \Sim`u*la"crum\, n.; pl. Simulacra. [L. See
      Simulate.]
      A likeness; a semblance; a mock appearance; a sham; -- now
      usually in a derogatory sense.

      I can't read "simula- wha?" without hearing it in Professor Farnsworth's voice.

    5. Re:simula- wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Simalcrum: from the D&D spell (and maybe from
      > wherever that came from.)

      Yup, it's an old word. From the American Heritage Dictionary:

      ----
      NOUN: Inflected forms: pl. simulacra (-lkr, -lkr)
      1. An image or representation. 2. An unreal or vague semblance.
      ETYMOLOGY: Latin simulcrum (from simulre, to simulate; see simulate) + -crum, n. suff.
      ----

      Also, from a random GeoCities blog:

      ----
      Simulacra and Simulations, by Jean Baudrillard, is the book in which Neo hid his diskette. I started reading it and was amazed by the relevance of the concept of the 'simulacrum' to The Matrix.
      ----

      Between D&D, a close viewing of The Matrix, or Latin Club, this story's poster's likelihood of having gotten laid in High School seem remote. I shall hoist a stein in honor of his or her unexercised genetalia. Sliante!

    6. Re:simula- wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how many people don't know this (most also believe the troll is the poster, rather than the post). Normally it's more amusing not to correct them, but yes, you have it right. Trolling is a common method of catching salmon (commercially as well as "sport"). Traditionally you drag one or two lines from a rowboat, which at least involves some effort. The term dates at least from early Usenet.

      Some of the under-the-bridge transferrence has been intentional, of course, and perfectly appropriate. It's a multilayered term. ;)

    7. Re:simula- wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not insightful, it's stupid.

      "Troll", as in what fishing boats do. Except trolling for comments, instead of fish.

      Simulacrum is a far older word than D&D.

      Maybe if you read instead of playing games and eating Cheetos, you'd be less fucking ignorant.

    8. Re:simula- wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting theory, but fundamentally wrong. I did *not* get laid in high school; but in high school I was lacking a full understanding of things Baudrillard. Once picking up Simulacra et Simulations, I found that my partaking in "dual-partied exercises of genitalia" was more common than Duchamp's name being dropped at an undergraduate art symposium.

      In short, Baudrillard got me laid. Vive le Baudrillard!

  6. For the NY Times disabled by Dugsmyname · · Score: 5, Informative

    Carson Daly rose to fame as the host of "Total Request Live" on Viacom's MTV. Less well known is his side gig as a superhuman D. J. With a little help from digital editing, Mr. Daly can do a top-10 countdown show tailored to the phoned-in requests of radio listeners in 11 different cities without actually knowing which songs he is counting down.

    Mr. Daly's syndicated radio show, "Carson Daly Most Requested," is produced by Premiere Radio Networks, a unit of the broadcasting giant Clear Channel Communications. The program runs each weekday on 140 stations -- most of them owned by Clear Channel -- although only 11 receive the digitally customized version that seeks to simulate a local program.

    "Most Requested" has been on the air for nearly two years, but only recently have people not directly involved in the program become aware of the extent to which technology is allowing Mr. Daly to cozy up to local listeners. Radio experts say the program involves perhaps the most extensive use yet of digital audio processing to offer localized shows from a central location. And members of a major broadcasting union are investigating to determine whether the techniques violate local labor agreements.

    Clear Channel executives and Mr. Daly declined to discuss the program and the technology. But according to former Clear Channel employees, Mr. Daly spends several hours a week in a studio in his Manhattan apartment, reading scripts with short song introductions and longer segments of D. J. patter. His audio feed is transmitted to Los Angeles, where the show's engineers turn the segments into digital files and drop them into a database.

    With a lot of cutting and pasting, the engineers create 11 customized hourlong countdown shows for cities like New York, Philadelphia and Detroit, and two national pop and rhythm-and-blues countdowns for other markets. The customization means Mr. Daly can seem to be telling listeners in a particular city their most-requested songs for that day -- without ever seeing the city's top-10 list.

    Clear Channel has been widely criticized for its use of so-called voice-tracking technology, which enables prerecorded D. J.'s to sound to listeners in a distant city as if they were both local and live.

    Opponents of media consolidation say the technology allows Clear Channel to ignore its regulatory mandate requiring the company to have local stations serve local audiences.

    In a case that will go to trial this week, the National Labor Relations Board is charging that Clear Channel violated the contracts of the staff at WWPR-FM in New York, a hip-hop and rhythm-and-blues station known as Power 105.1. The suit argues that the station began using a voice-tracked Los Angeles D. J. without union authorization.

    The company has said that the show, "Power After Hours," was a syndicated program, which the contract allows.

    Mr. Daly's show uses technology that is similar to voice tracking, but industry experts said that the digital manipulation of the host's words and phrases is so extensive as to put the show in a league of its own.

    "This tells you that Carson Daly, as a brand and a personality, is worth the extra studio effort," said Tom Taylor, the editor of Inside Radio, an industry newsletter. "The technology has been advancing to the point where you can do that and make it sound really good."

    Steven Dunston, a sound designer and editor in Los Angeles who worked at Clear Channel's Premiere Radio unit when the Daly show began in early 2001, said he helped build its innovative database, which had tens of thousands of audio samples in it.

    He said that because Mr. Daly had only a few hours a week to devote to the program, phrases like "coming in at No. 4" were recorded once and stored in the database for reuse. The call letters and phone numbers of the 11 stations, in Mr. Daly's voice, were inserted throughout.

    "It really was fascinating from a technological angle," Mr. Dunston said. "Nothing had been done to that extent before."

    People close to the current show said its operations had changed little since it began. A spokeswoman for Premiere declined to answer questions about the production of Mr. Daly's show, saying that was proprietary information. She said Mr. Daly was unavailable for comment.

    Not all of Mr. Daly's sentences are digitally constructed. The show's writers give him longer segments, like gossip roundups and customized introductions for New York and Los Angeles. But much of the material is written with recycling in mind, so a joke about Christina Aguilera that is used to introduce the No. 3 song in Boston can be used on another day when the song is, say, No. 6 in Atlanta.

    Mr. Daly's unconventional countdown only recently caught the attention of the New York chapter of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, which represents broadcast personnel and opposes voice tracking. Peter Fuster, the chapter's assistant executive director, said the union had previously thought that the show was just a national countdown with local branding.

    Mr. Fuster said, "We're looking into whether the customized package that they are preparing for New York violates our collective bargaining agreement" at Z-100 (WHTZ-FM), the station that carries the show in New York. If the station is giving Mr. Daly's show a list of songs to play, that would essentially be voice tracking, which is not allowed under the contract, Mr. Fuster said.

    Mr. Daly is likely to be even more pressed for time now that he has his own late-night television talk show on NBC, "Last Call With Carson Daly." But when he needs some time off from his radio work, the database lets the countdown roll on. Before he goes on vacation, the show's producers try to make sure they have enough sound clips so his voice can introduce top-10 lists that have yet to be compiled.

    That has not always gone smoothly. Mr. Dunston, the sound designer, said that at one point a new Michael Jackson song, "You Rock My World," unexpectedly showed up on the charts. Mr. Daly was unavailable that day, and because he had never introduced a song by Mr. Jackson, the engineers had to dig through old recordings to find a segment in which he made an offhand reference to the singer. Then they hunted down bits of the song title and assembled all the pieces.

    "We had to cobble things together," Mr. Dunston said.

    1. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks. Very helpful, considering I thought Carson Daly was a woman.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    2. Re:For the NY Times disabled by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mr. Daly spends several hours a week in a studio in his Manhattan apartment,

      yet more evidence that we should eat the rich.

    3. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it funny how copyright infringement is okay unless it's open source software? I like that, it cracks me up.

    4. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    5. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Forgotten · · Score: 5, Funny

      Carson Daly is neither a man nor a woman. Carson Daly, is, in fact, already a simulacrum. This whole thing is a smokescreen.

      The original Carson Daly, like most TV hosts nowadays, was a vaccuum-molded plastic talking head with interchangeable parts (the molding process isn't perfect, so some vaccuum always remains within). You've seen early versions of this technology sold as "Mr. Potato Head". Strictly speaking this incarnation didn't talk, but could be synced to an audio track. The interchangeable parts are especially useful, allowing facial features to be gradually changed and teeth to whiten, etc, as fashion dictates while still preserving the all-important familiarity factor.

      Work was done on transitioning to a fully digital TV host starting in the early nineties. Trivia - parts of the movie "Toy Story" actually stemmed from this work (the digitally rendered Mr. Potato Head is an obvious example). These early efforts were extremely non-realtime, however, and unsuited even for the glazed perceptions of seasoned TV viewers.

      Now these "people" are thought to be ready for primetime. They're still not completely realistic, which is why the initial rollout will be on networks like MTV where the viewing audience is especially numb and used to very rapid edits, constant lip-syncing, and other concealments of ineptitude. But soon you won't be able to find a real live TV host on either coast of the US. This isn't expected to actually effect the parties in any way.

      Hope that helps.

    6. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes mod up a repost of a story so the lazy people don't have to sign up for the NY times.

      Good job mods

    7. Re:For the NY Times disabled by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Once, JJ Baudrilard came to speak at my university. He spoke in french to the largely english speaking audience through a very talented interperter.

      When it came time to answer questions, he started to answer the first few through the interpreter, and then he mysteriously shut up and the interpreter just kept on answering the questions.

      So the father of the hyperreal became a simulacrum himself.

      (When the other speakers found out how much he was being paid, they all got on the staff telephone and made long distance calls until they'd rung up a bill equal to the difference between his fees and theirs.)

    8. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, you'd have less karma.

    9. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Timmeh · · Score: 1

      Or just use the Google News partner link. Or the NYT Random login generator? Just thinking out loud...

    10. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Hollinger · · Score: 1

      "They're still not completely realistic, which is why the initial rollout will be on networks like MTV where the viewing audience is especially numb and used to very rapid edits, constant lip-syncing, and other concealments of ineptitude."

      This is why I call MTV the flashy-shiny-thing channel.

    11. Re:For the NY Times disabled by schmink182 · · Score: 1
      Carson Daly is neither a man nor a woman

      Carson Daly is indeed neither a man nor a woman, as shown in the following.

      I'm Carson Daly, and I'm a massive tool.
      - Jimmy Fallon as Carson Daly on SNL

      There you have it.

    12. Re:For the NY Times disabled by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Vaguely relevant sidenote: Carson Daly was actually a (live, real, local) DJ on KROQ-FM 106.7 in Los Angeles for a few weeks in about 1996 or thereabouts. Then he defected the MTV... and as far as I'm concerned, they can keep him. :) KROQ's not owned by Clear Channel, thank Bender, and here's hoping it stays that way.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  7. I don't know what's scarier... by gotroot801 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the legal ramifications of voice tracking, or the fact that since CCC started this, there's only been one instance where they've had a song show up that they didn't handpick^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hanticipate making the Top 10.

    1. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by GregGardner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I find it interesting that in this case that they went to some trouble to air this song that they didn't expect to be on the Top 10. All of their stations use pre-defined playlists anyway, so you would just expect the Top 10 to come straight from that. If some listeners actually attempt to call-in to get some song not on the playlist onto the Top 10, I would have just expected them to silently ignore their request, given their track record and motives.

      Are the listeners really going to find out what happened? Especially if they are already swallowing the crap that Clear Channel is sending down their throats. If those listeners actually tried to make a stink about it, they could just claim that it was obvious that someone was "stuffing the ballot boxes" or something like that.

      It's obvious that Clear Channel is not in the business of pleasing the masses, just focusing on making money.

    2. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Rochester, NY it's obvious there must be a large group of people that like to hear the same song over and over. The #1 song for the "drive at 5" is usually the same for at least 4 weeks straight and then completely disappears. Of course 5:00 is not the only time to hear this wonderful song of the month. You can also catch it 37 other times during the day in between the never-ending barrage of Pink Floyd and Guns N' Roses which EVERYBODY requests.

    3. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      The explanation is obvious.

      ClearChannel, knowing that it hasn't yet achieved world domination, expected the news of their ploy to break sooner or later; in fact, they planned on it.

      They obviously had the Michael Jackson song story prepared in advance, so that they could present it as evidence that there were still human beings, with human weaknesses, at the heart of the machine.

      The truth, of course, is quite different, but this canned tale of human error keeps us safe from this ultimate and awful knowledge.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    4. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      I could understand Pink Floyd, but GnR has what, 4 songs they can play on the radio?

      November Rain
      Welcome to the Jungle
      Patience
      Sweet Child Of Mine

      I really can't think of any others.

    5. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      When I worked on the show, there was a lot of effort put into producing a show that represented actual choices by listeners.

      There is a surprising amount of variety between the top 15 ClearChannel pop stations. On an average day, 25-40 songs might be represented. In addition, many of those might be remixes unique to a particular region of the country.

      The stations submit their lists at night, and the show is compiled the next morning, which usually gives the editing crews enough time to scrounge up the appropriate tunes.

      In the case of the Michael Jackson song, one station had gotten hold of a pre-release version, and caught Premiere Radio by surprise.

    6. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by rot26 · · Score: 1

      Mr. Brownstone. This doesn't negate the point of your post, which I agree with. MrB just happens to be the only GnR song that *I* personally like, and I do ocassionally hear it on the (local CC) radio.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    7. Re:I don't know what's scarier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paradise City!

      Take me down
      To the paradise city
      Where the grass is green
      And the girls are pretty
      Oh wont you please Take me home!

  8. Re:Wha? by mughi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Max Headroom? Network 23? WTF?

    Why, just use Google and see what you can find.

  9. Re:Wha? by neomiasma · · Score: 2, Funny

    You call yourself a geek? I want to see your membership card, Mister! Try this link for starters. If you get TechTV, try catching some episodes.

    --

    -------
    And we also have a cancel button...in case you don't want toast.
  10. means? by qoncept · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's all a lot of work. Is this guy so important he cant put in (lets say.. an hour per show, since its an hour show and the music is (supposed to be) most of it, times 11 shows) 11 hours a week? What do they pay all the guys on the soundboards doing all the work?

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:means? by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      The program runs each weekday. 11 unique markets (140 stations), 1 hour show daily, 5 days. That's 55 hours a week. Nevermind the fact that it probably runs at the same time in a few cities which would make it impossible for them to do it any other way.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    2. Re:means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of that hour is taken up by commercials and music, I doubt his contribution is more than 1 minute/song. So 11 shows, 10 songs = about 2 hours/day

    3. Re:means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt that.. Since they reuse most of the soundbites for his top ten, IE "Coming In at number 4," and "Well be back after this" Id say he does 30 minutes a week tops.

  11. Where's my... by Valiss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...seizure? I miss cyberpunk TV where any show could do me in.

    --

    -Valiss
  12. Re:Wha? by nomadic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh, also TechTV occasionally shows reruns.

  13. Unions are just looking to save their jobs by JasonUCF · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is just a simple case of a radio station using technology to bring high profile talent into a market.

    It's been done for tens of years. Ok, so technology now allows them to fine tune it up to every tiny little word -- that's kind of cool, actually -- but anyway, do you really think Casey Casem or Dick Clark knew anything about half the cities they were broadcasting in?

    It's America's Top 40 Dance Band Stand! Broadcasting right here in Minnoke!

    The union's just looking to save their local DJs some jobs. Carson Daly is not going to appear on every radio dial. The fear is, though, if people tune into this, maybe they would like more high profile talent on their other radio shows.. not local talent. Good luck unions! ugh, would hate to fight that fight..

    It would be cool to hear Carson Daly stuttering over his words digitally and repeating a star's name over and over and over again.

    1. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I have never before seen the word 'talent' used to refer to Carsan Daly.

    2. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      I dunno about other places, but our local talent sucks ass. Not that I would want to listen to Carson Daley, but it would be hard to be worse.

    3. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by gpinzone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, I heard on the Howard Stern show that Wolfman Jack used to prerecord his responses in advance and left it to another person to create a conversation to fit in with his canned phrases.

    4. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1
      I have never before seen the word 'talent' used to refer to Carsan Daly.

      Or Carson Daily, or even Carsen Dally for that matter.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    5. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      1) Yes, unions are just trying to save themselves a revenue stream here.

      2) This is messed up. The gov't gave broadcasters certain frequencies on the condition that they'd follow rules (provide local content). They are not doing that.

      Of course, I think all frequencies should be regulated in the same manner as visible light: You can't blind anyone.

      Given that we've decided not to deregulate radio properly, it would at least be nice if we could at least follow the few decentralizing regulations that we've got.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty common. Each morning a local DJ in my town has a "conversation" with David Letterman just before playing the top 10 list.

      I'm reasonably sure that Dave doesn't "go the extra mile" and call the 3rd ranked morning show in my small town every morning.

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    7. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by susano_otter · · Score: 1
      This is just a simple case of a radio station using technology to bring high profile talent into a market.

      Maybe they're bringing the high profile into the market, but I don't think a person's talent can be conveyed in the manner described. Of course, if the profile is high enough, talent is no longer necessary. And if the profile distribution is efficient enough, it becomes a vicious cycle: the profile is high because of wide distribution, and it's widely distributed because it's so high. Talent doesn't enter into the equation at all.

      Which makes Carson Daly the obvious choice for this procedure.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    8. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Informative
      Um, everybody does this. That's how most radio stations get interviews with artists: they receive a CD with all the artist's interview answers recorded as separate tracks, and the liner notes are the complete script, with questions and answers highlighted. The local DJ reads from his part of the script (the questions), and then queues up the right answer tracks in response.

      What? You thought that rockstars personally visited every radio station in from here to Springfield? Bwahahaha!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    9. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      But here's the part that I don't understand: How to they handle the phonetics/annunciation/inflection? Specifically, I can say a word in 5 different ways depending on where it is in the sentence; what words I said before it (WOW! _They_ actually ...); what context the word is in (Killer! Bro! vs. He's a child killer).

      It must be one hell of a feat matching the phrases into a coherent sentence. I have yet to hear a telephone answering system even announce a series of numbers with any reasonable amount of clarity.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    10. Re:Unions are just looking to save their jobs by slhack3r · · Score: 1

      ....using technology to bring high profile talent into a market....

      carson daly has absolutely NO talent.

      what he does all day : reads a teleprompter, asks lame scripted interview questions, and occasionally ad libs a "yo, check out this new video from britney spears" for an audience of pre-pubescent girls. high profile, yes. talent? who has less?

  14. Damn by alaric187 · · Score: 2, Funny

    [sarcasm]
    This whole time I thought that MTV and Clear Channel were picking songs that were really good instead of just shoving whatever happens to be popular down my throat.
    [/sarcasm]

    1. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      When in fact they're picking what will be popular ahead of time, then shoving THAT down you're throat.

  15. The technology can't be too far along... by One+Louder · · Score: 5, Funny
    She said Mr. Daly was unavailable for comment.
    I guess they forgot to prerecord that part.
  16. You must not be 20 seconds into the future.... by JasonUCF · · Score: 1

    Mmmm... C-C-C-Catch the Wave, Coke.

    -i eat green eggs and ham, b00yah i am.

    1. Re:You must not be 20 seconds into the future.... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Mmmm... C-C-C-Catch the Wave, Coke."

      Don't say the P-Word!

  17. Re:Wha? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know Max Headroom, but who's Carson Daly and whats the simaluacarom?

    Isn't he the guy from MTV that does the show about Boy Bands?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  18. Re:i hate carson daly by denisonbigred · · Score: 1

    Of course he won't, most celebrities are to afraid of beeing branded a geek to read slashdot.

    --

    "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
  19. What am I supposed to do? by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I read all this and couldn't help but mutter, "Wha?" I'm not a compulsive mouth-breather or anything; I just don't know what I'm supposed to think here. So please, who in the article am I supposed to hate? I am under the impression I'm supposed to hate somebody there. Is ClearChannel the bad guy? And what's this got to do with blipverts? ...Or even Max for that matter.

    Wha?

    --
    No I'm not trolling.
    1. Re:What am I supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That answer is simple: hate Clear Channel AND Carson Daly. THe only reason for this is their ability to program the youth of the United States and control our airwaves.

    2. Re:What am I supposed to do? by k3v0 · · Score: 1

      it can pretty much be assumed that regardless of the post name or articel, you can always call Clear Channel the bad guy

    3. Re:What am I supposed to do? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Not sure either, but Clear Channel is pretty much always the bad guy. The kind of stuff they pull makes Microsoft look like the monastic order of St. Francis.

  20. Did I miss the point? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "With a lot of cutting and pasting, the engineers create 11 customized hourlong countdown shows for cities like New York, Philadelphia and Detroit, and two national pop and rhythm-and-blues countdowns for other markets. The customization means Mr. Daly can seem to be telling listeners in a particular city their most-requested songs for that day -- without ever seeing the city's top-10 list.
    Clear Channel has been widely criticized for its use of so-called voice-tracking technology, which enables prerecorded D. J.'s to sound to listeners in a distant city as if they were both local and live."


    So... what's the BFD as long as he doesn't soound like a Speak N Spell?

    1. Re:Did I miss the point? by Fugly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So... what's the BFD as long as he doesn't soound like a Speak N Spell?

      If you work in the industry, the BFD is that one guy just did your job in 20 different cities. It sucks for you because the number of available jobs has now shrunk to nothing. It sucks for the public because now they're all getting the same canned crap. There's one thing for dinner and if you don't like it, tough luck. It sucks for the public because there are fewer local on-air personalities that truly understand the experience of being a New Yorker, Clevelander, Los... um... Angeleser... um... whatever.

      It's great for Clear Channel though because they just eliminated 19 paychecks. It looks great on the books and looks great to the stockholders. It's a shame that over the last 50 years it's destroyed one hell of a brilliant creative medium.

    2. Re:Did I miss the point? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "If you work in the industry, the BFD is that one guy just did your job in 20 different cities."

      Nothing insightful to say here, just wanted to thank you for explaining what the problem was. Now that I read the article, I can pick out where it said that.

      Yeesh, you'd think that a.) the article'd be clearer or b.) the person that posted the article would have cleared up the problem in addition to the vague Max Headroom reference.

      Oh well, you clarified it for me, thank you.

    3. Re:Did I miss the point? by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      Better that than outsourcing the radio work to Bangalore

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    4. Re:Did I miss the point? by Fugly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a hard time understanding parts of the article myself. Sorry if I came off a bit snappish. I suppose I'm a bit sensitive to this right now because I just found out yesterday that one of my very best friends is moving 1000 miles away for a morning show gig at the end of the month. I'm really going to miss both him and his wife. It's just been impossible for him to land a job since Clear Channel bought up all our local stations. He's had to resort to overnight news on the weekends and waiting tables to get by. It's sad considering how talented he is and how respected he was around town.

    5. Re:Did I miss the point? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " I just found out yesterday that one of my very best friends is moving 1000 miles away for a morning show gig at the end of the month. I'm really going to miss both him and his wife. It's just been impossible for him to land a job since Clear Channel bought up all our local stations. He's had to resort to overnight news on the weekends and waiting tables to get by. It's sad considering how talented he is and how respected he was around town."

      Wow. Well, of course I wish this person and his wife well.

      Technology has a way of removing jobs traditionally done by humans, it's a pity that your explanation wasn't provided in the article. I think a lot of us at Slashdot could find ourselves automated or serviced out of a job.

      If this article had come from your point of view, Slashdot could have had an insightful discussion about how to handle situations like that. I have my own semi-interesting stories (I'm not even close to doing what I was originally hired to do), and I imagine other people do too.

      Anyway, take comfort in knowing that everything'll end up alright. At least with the internet, you're not going to be as far from those people as you might have been.

    6. Re:Did I miss the point? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Some people saw it as a brilliant creative medium, but a lot of them just wanted us to shut up and play the records. Sometimes other announcers were the only people aware of how brilliantly creative you were.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:Did I miss the point? by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

      It's great for Clear Channel though because they just eliminated 19 paychecks.

      Yeah, in exchange for one paycheck 20 times the size. Just for Carson Whatshisname, not to mention the high priced tech talent they have to hire to patch it all together.
      Not that I'm a big TRL fan, but I really can't imagine that he'd be much worse than the "local talent" in my town.

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    8. Re:Did I miss the point? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I really must insist that it's 100% the public's fault. I *never* listen to Clear Channel, and I have no moral reasons whatsoever for my choice. I listen to NPR and college radio only, and I do it because they play what I like to hear.

      If everyone in the Bay Area is listening to bad alternative/bad hip hop/bad oldies, they're morons. And they *do* have options. UC Berkeley's radio is excellent, as is SFSU's. If anyone else felt like listening in, CCC might have to do something to compete. As it is, they apparently give bay area listeners exactly what they want.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:Did I miss the point? by kahrhoff · · Score: 1

      I think you have it all wrong. The crappy local dj's diserve to loose there jobs. If the local stations don't get any negative feedback, if the public doesn't give two fucks, who cares? I keep falling back to the line from Other Peoples Money. I'm sure that the last company to make buggy whips made the best damn buggy whips money could buy" But the point is they're not needed anymore! So screw the DJ's and anyone else who can't innovate.

    10. Re:Did I miss the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Yorker, Clevelander, Los... um... Angeleser..

      We usually call ourselves Angelenos.

  21. Who needs blipverts? by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That hip-hop crap Daly's introducing is already enough to make my head explode....

    Ah, Bach!

    1. Re:Who needs blipverts? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Radar on M*A*S*H, right? When he was courting the intellectual hottie;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  22. Re:Wha? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "Why, just use Google and see what you can find [google.com]."

    Because Google gives you information, but doesn't put it into context. Try using Google to figure out the 'In Soviet Russia..' jokes.

  23. Max Headroom vs Carson Daley by Dr_LHA · · Score: 4, Funny

    Max Headroom was great, however he was clearly from far in our future (the 20 minutes they suggested was obviously an gross underestimate). Current technology only allows creation of fake personalities with absolutely no charisma (has anyone seen Carson Daly's talk show?).

    Hopefully with increased technology we will be able to create in the future a media personality with the charisma of Max Headroom.

    1. Re:Max Headroom vs Carson Daley by tchapin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I surprisingly like his talk show. He's had some very interesting guests, and has gotten into surprisingly non-typical talk show interview topics.

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
  24. Some Local Radio Stations Are Only Transmitters by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have talked with someone who have worked for
    the likes of Clear Channel and other large
    multi-station broadcasters.

    This has been going on for at least two years now,
    especially with the larger chains.

    As I remember, he told me that the announcers
    would say a catalog of phrases to be digitized
    and cataloged into a data base. They would say
    each city's name; common street names, names of
    businesses, common school names, common church
    names; the list goes on.

    With this massive database of phrases (and many
    that can be used for different locals; Saint
    Mary's Church could be in Buffalo or Atlanta),
    now they can put together just about anything
    and make it 'local' to you.

    What is interesting is that many of these stations
    are becomming nothing more than a transmitter.
    Studios, productions facilities, and even sales
    and marketing have all but dissapeared from the
    local scene. All of that is done remotely.

    Local companies that want to buy ads now deal
    with the national office. They come up with a script. The script can be assembed via computer
    using the announcer's voice. Only if something unique needs to be said, does the announcer say anything. After all, Henrys' Fine Drycleaning
    has probably been used before the Henry's Fine
    Drycleaning in your hometown decides to advertise
    on the radio.

    School sports scores, news, and so forth, can be
    handled remotely.

    --
    Cleara
    1. Re:Some Local Radio Stations Are Only Transmitters by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

      Hmm, re. the bit about scripting localised content with computers, I can't help but wonder how it would color the slashdot community's reaction to the concept if it were presented in the form of a frontpage story by taco in his 'gee whiz, look, another cool application of computer technology' mode rather than the less approving hue you cast it in.

      Can someone take this chap's comment and submit it as news? That would, I believe, be our first meta-dupe, aside from the fact that it'd satisfy my curiosity. :-)

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    2. Re:Some Local Radio Stations Are Only Transmitters by wgrover · · Score: 1

      Anyone interested in reading more about the effect Clear Channel's conquest has on local broadcasting should check out the San Francisco Bay Guardian's story about about local station KMEL.

    3. Re:Some Local Radio Stations Are Only Transmitters by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      If this continues, maybe radio will become just like telemarketing!

      Back when telemarketing began, telemarketers would call people up by hand using a phone book or a list they had collected. It worked, but they wasted a lot of time dialing and waiting for people to answer. So today telemarketers use systems that auto-dial numbers, predict when telemarketers will finish their current call, and connect telemarketers to households with no down time.

      These days, disk jockeys spend a lot of time waiting for records to play out before they say the song that just played or yell about some radio promotion. That's wasted time! With networked studios, we could have one DJ run ten radio stations. Computers could model out the songs to be played, record the DJ introducing songs and promoting, and sequence it all together. There would be a few minute delay between what you hear and what the DJ is saying, but the recorded telephone conversations DJs put on the air now are already delayed.

      I really hope this doesn't happen to radio, but considering the financial rewards I doubt companies like Clear Channel aren't considering it.

    4. Re:Some Local Radio Stations Are Only Transmitters by Reziac · · Score: 1

      One of the local radio stations regularly runs a local car dealership's ad featuring the voice of some aged celebrity whose identity escapes me... anyway, despite some "personalization", the ads are clearly prefabbed. What gives them away? How the local city's name (Lancaster) is pronounced in the ad:

      announcer: lank-a-ster (as in Pennsylvania)
      our fair city: lan-cast-er (as in California)

      No one who'd ever actually been here would make that mistake.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  25. Re:Wha? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh thanks for explaining it. Now people'll try to pass off their typos as Max Headroom impressions.

  26. Uhhh... by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    Carson Daly already makes my head explode.
    Stupid Carson-getting-to-date-Jennifer-Love-Hewitt-and-Ta ra-Reid-Daly.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:Uhhh... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I'd say "Stupid-Carson-Dating-Stupid-Bimbo-Actresses-Daly" ...

      Not that those two aren't hot...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    2. Re:Uhhh... by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're bimbos, but I still loves me some Jennifer Love Hewitt, and Tara Reid would be a great shag.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  27. Re:Wha? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    3rd Edition PHB P252.

    From the SRD.

    "Simulacrum creates an illusory duplicate of any creature. The duplicate creature is partially real and formed from ice or snow. The duplicate appears to be exactly the same as the original, but there are differences: The simulacrum has only 51% to 60% (50%+1d10%) of the hit points, knowledge (including level, skills, and speech), and personality of the real creature. Creatures familiar with the original might detect the ruse with a successful Spot check. The character must make a Disguise check when the character casts the spell to determine how good the likeness is.

    At all times the simulacrum remains under the character's absolute command. No special telepathic link exists, so command must be exercised in some other manner. The simulacrum has no ability to become more powerful. It cannot increase its level or abilities. If destroyed, it reverts to snow and melts instantly into nothingness. A complex process requiring at least 1 day, 100 gp per hit point, and a fully equipped magical laboratory can repair damage to the simulacrum."

  28. The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Fugly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The on-air personality is inches away from being a thing of the past. I have a lot of friends that work in radio. Most of them have had the stations they work for bought by clear channel. Most of my friends that are still on-air personalities (many are unemployeed these days) are being pumped out to at least 3 stations with little tweaks being done to the audio to make it sound like they are local. Frequently celebrity interviews are mocked up from a stock tape of the celebrity answering questions with the DJ's voice dubbed between even.

    I keep hoping that eventually people will notice how sterile, packaged and crappy it is and that independent stations will be able to compete by way of superior programming. However, apparently people don't give a rats ass. They don't even notice how shitty radio is these days.

    1. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by cliffiecee · · Score: 1

      Frequently celebrity interviews are mocked up from a stock tape of the celebrity answering questions with the DJ's voice dubbed between even.

      Gee, I thought that was the norm...

      Seriously, unless it was a live show, I always assumed that radio 'interviews' were recorded.

      Maybe not with the answers recorded separate from the questions, but still...

    2. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      They don't - they're not listening to it...

      They're getting their music from the Net...

      I own a Walkman and haven't listened to it in a year. I either listent to my MP3's downloaded from the Net, or listen to radio stations broadcasting over Shoutcast through Winamp...

      I suspect 50 million other people are doing the same...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Fugly · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know what the norm was for sure I suppose. What I do know is that my buddy who was on the morning show for one of the bigger local radio stations here used to do all of his interviews live when they were owned by Nationwide Insurance. They were over the phone most of the time of course but they were on the air live. After they were purchased by JCorp, he was still doing most of them but not all of them live. After they were purchased by ClearChannel, I don't think any of them were live anymore though I could be wrong.

      It sucks too because he was an amazing interviewer who did stuff that you just won't here in a canned, pre-recorded interview. He has a great tape of himself doing his super exagerated Chubby Checker impersonation to Chubby Checker to get his opinion. Ok, it sounds dorky but it was hilarious, trust me. You just don't get creative stuff like that when it has to be general purpose.

    4. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by rob-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A Clear Channel station in the Dallas, TX area is doing this right now; there's a radio 'personality' who used to be located in Dallas and does a show every night from about 7-10, I believe. In actuality, he's physically located in Florida (Miami, I think), but the station gives the illusion that he's actually in Dallas at the time of the broadcast, which he isn't.

      The funny thing is that the station doesn't tell the listeners that this is the case, so logically people will try to call in to get on the air with the DJ, only to find that there's simply a guy running the board playing the tape, and he has to explain to the caller that the DJ is 'busy' or 'can't come to the phone' or 'not taking calls'.

      Clear Channel is a disease to radio stations...all the playlists are preprogrammed and sent from somewhere else. There are no true DJs at these stations, just people who push buttons. And if you have 2 Clear Channel stations in one market, chances are you can find them playing the same songs simulatenously more often.

    5. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by dcuny · · Score: 2, Informative
      • Frequently celebrity interviews are mocked up from a stock tape of the celebrity answering questions with the DJ's voice dubbed between even.

      I used to scrounge around in used junk stores, and a couple times I ran across records containing pre-recorded interviews. They were great - they included the script for the DJ for the canned questions. I wish I hadn't been so poor back then; I could have bought them and ... never mind, they wouldn't fit into my CD player anyway.

      In one of my old jobs, the guy who wrote documentation had a passing resemblance to Tom Cruise. Whenever a new Cruise movie came out, he got a call from his agent to look the part and cruise the town (pun intended). Apparently it's a common scam to send out dopplegangers to get some local media buzz going.

      There are two kinds of lies. No, sorry, I lied about that.

    6. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Fugly · · Score: 1

      I either listent to my MP3's downloaded from the Net, or listen to radio stations broadcasting over Shoutcast through Winamp...

      I suspect 50 million other people are doing the same...


      I also spend very little time listening to radio these days (car only in fact) but I guarantee there are far more people listening to good old fashioned FM radio right now than internet streams. Plus half the people listening to internet streams are probably listening to streams of traditional FM stations.

      It might not be important to you but it's very important. Also, one thing that most internet radio is really bad for is providing the type of content that an old fashioned DJ used to provide. Most of the streams I've found are either all talk or 0 talk, no announcing songs, jokes, giving background info on an artist, etc. I suppose that's one of the reasons that I just listen to .mp3's directly off my harddrive all day.

    7. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should get a car MP3/CD player They are really affordable now. Pioneer models DEH-P4500, 5500, and 7400 all play MP3s and start at $250 (you can get it way cheaper than that if you shop at the right places). I got the 7400 a few months ago and haven't listened to the radio since. It's worth it.

    8. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by km790816 · · Score: 1

      There are three stations I listen to in Seattle:
      2 are NPR. 1 is a free hip-hop channel done by a local high school.

      I'm happy to donate $100 a year to keep these going while not supporting this commercial BS.

      You don't have to support this crap.

    9. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by jejones · · Score: 1

      Frequently celebrity interviews are mocked up from a stock tape of the celebrity answering questions with the DJ's voice dubbed between even.

      That at least has been done for a long time, with vinyl records of Elvis or the Beatles answering questions and gaps for the local DJ to ask the canned questions. I bet they're collectors' items nowadays.

    10. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Jru+Hym · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good riddance. The fewer interruptions of the music the better. But that doesn't mean I want syndicated Carson either. All I want is music, no interviews, contests, give-aways, station calls, DJ banter, commercials, etc. Unfortunately this is the crap with which one needs to put up in order to hear a couple of songs. Screw it. I'll just listen to my MP3 player.

      --
      This lobster was alive when it hit the frothy, boiling water.
    11. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      Good riddance. Seriously. When I want to listen to the radio, I want to listen to music. Period. Yes, a voice announcing the name of the song is nice, but nothing else. Not some unfunny moron banally inserting his "humor" so that it overlaps the beginnings and endings of half of the songs. If I want mindless chatter, I'll wait till I'm standing in line at the supermarket.

      If I want to listen to people talk, versus dribble, I'll tune in NPR.

      Local radio would only be interesting to me if it consisted of local bands. It isn't suddenly of interest just because it is broadcast locally; the quality doesn't suddenly improve because the advertisements I hear are for used cars I can buy locally. The quality improves if the contents gets better, which, whether it is broadcast from Naples, Italy, or Augusta, Georgia, doesn't depend on anything other than eliminating blather from the stations which aren't specifically geared for TALK radio, and having some musical diversity.

      Except, sadly, if you don't play a steady stream of tripe, your audience dwindles, and the station is replaced by one playing Celine Dion and Spears.

      I guess we get what we deserve.

    12. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      One local Clear Channel radio station must be a bit of a renegade. At times they actually have a live local DJ (who can be assaulted by telephone at a local number) and once in a while the DJ is clearly playing what they damned well feel like, not what's on the menu. But it's probably a really low-budget station, and maybe they only run CC content part time by contract??

      I remember independent local commercial stations. They sure as hell were a lot more interesting than the current canned pap. When the last independent commercial station in Bozeman MT (KBMN) got eaten, there was a local uproar over it for a while, but it soon passed, since the new owners ignored all complaints. That was about 1981, IIRC.

      KBMN had a huge vinyl library of unusual stuff. The new owners, preferring the economy of tape, sent it all to the dump. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      At times they actually have a live local DJ (who can be assaulted by telephone at a local number) and once in a while the DJ is clearly playing what they damned well feel like, not what's on the menu.

      Perhaps he plays Emmanuel Goldstein to Clear Channel's Big Brother? He's the visible renegade to make them seem less omnipresent... Okay, I guess I'm getting a little paranoid (it's only RADIO for Chrissake, I never listened to the stuff before the CC takeover), but it's fun to pretend that Corporate America is more organized than it really is.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    14. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by luciensims · · Score: 2, Informative

      Allow me to present to you the opposite of just about every complaint you have, and the finest radio station on the face of the planet: Triple J.

      It's an Australian government funded station. It has good hosts, no ads, and no set playlists. They pimp local music constantly, and hold competitions in cities and towns around Australia to get airplay and studio time. Silverchair is the first example off the top of my head of a band that came from these competitions.

      There is no finer radio station anywhere I've ever been. Check it out online and get more info at http://triplej.abc.net.au -- if you're a music lover, you won't regret it.

    15. Re:The long, slow, death of the DJ. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Considering that Corporate America often seems to have the "No, your OTHER left" problem wrt to right and left hands knowing what the other is doing... :)

      Yeah, it's only radio, hardly life or death, but it's certainly illustrative of the problems that develop when one management-driven conglomerate has effectively-total control over any given market. :(

      I think with the local station, it's just old equipment and small budget. They also often have bouts of being entirely off the air.

      [paranoia] Hey! You must be following me around! This is two stories in a row you've been replyin' to me! [/paranoia] :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  29. Keep your fricken head DOWN! by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    From the /. FAQ:
    You must never, ever, have anything less than perfect competence in everything, and if you are to post anything that may call this into question, you must be ridiculed by at least 3 people.

    I'm assuming that you're feeling really secure about yourself, to go and post something like this. ;)

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  30. A Different Breed by serutan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the article: "...members of a major broadcasting union are investigating to determine whether the techniques violate local labor agreements." Groups like the RIAA apparently are not alone in wanting to make sure new technology doesn't disturb existing revenue streams, and wanting to thwart it if it does. This kind of thing reminds me that geeks seem to live in a completely different continuum from the rest of the world.

    What would things be like today if, for example, computer programmers and electronics engineers had reacted in the same way to things like code-generating tools, CAD and microcircuitry, clinging instead to the practices of hand-entering 1's and 0's and wiring everything with a soldering iron, because more streamlined methods might threaten our jobs? I envision something like the computers in the movie Brazil, coexisting with pheumatic message tubes.

    1. Re:A Different Breed by bellers · · Score: 1
      I envision something like the computers in the movie Brazil, coexisting with pheumatic message tubes.

      Yeah, that would be really weird.

      --
      This space for rent.
  31. Re:Wha? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank you.

    I recall someone trying to explain that to me in grade school once, but his head was submerged in the toilet bowl at the time, and I was busy counting his lunch money.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  32. Videodrome by giel · · Score: 1

    For a movie dated 1983 it contained some very interesting and or prophetic ideas. Some of them similar to Max Headroom. A few:

    • The image on the screen will become reality for the viewers and people will live their lifes in this reality. Today think of all sorts of media as soaps, forums, chats, online games...
    • People will have digital names. For example chats, forums, domainnames.
    • The television broadcasts of videodrome contain an invisible 'signal' sending messages to its viewers. Yes, videodrome of course was after total world domination.
    --
    giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
  33. I stand corrected... by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....I formerly thought this was the main sign of the impending apocalypse for the music industry.

    Seriously tho, Carson Daly's show will promote piracy even more due to the creation of specific shows, of specific music, aimed for specific audiences.

    Dolemite

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  34. Regulatory mandate by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Casey Casem was a clearly syndicated show, which is a format that radio stations are allowed to broadcast. But there is a federal mandate that local stations serve a local audience. The mostly artificial construct involved hardly qualifies as serving a local audience, but that is how the stations are counting it.

    A good exemplar: calling this show local content is like calling ketchup a vegetable. And that's what they've doing for all this time.

    1. Re:Regulatory mandate by donutello · · Score: 1

      The mandate calls for serving a local audience - not for appeasing Union Labors job needs. There's a difference.

      Whether or not you like what Clear Channel is doing is a wholly different matter and people should and will vote for or against this with their listening $ - this is nothing for the government to be involved in, however.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    2. Re:Regulatory mandate by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      No only is it calling ketchup a vegetable, it's a vegetable made out of recycled newspaper. This is yet another step in Clear Channel's goal to cut out DJ's entirely to stream the music that they get the most payola for without and local resistance.

      Does anyone know how much it would take to write a simple wireless receiver that can grab any free wireless network and tune up a streaming music site? Slap an Airport on, and we may have the killer app for the Linux iPod.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    3. Re:Regulatory mandate by unitron · · Score: 1
      I'm going to have to go take several showers after I post this 'cause I'll feel so unclean saying anything in defense of those people, but by tailoring the show's playlist to the dreck most requested in that community they are serving their local audience to a greater degree than if every station carrying the show ran exactly the same content.

      Admittedly inserting a Michael Jackson song instead of whatever the other cities heard in that slot stretches the definition of "operating in the public interest" almost beyond recognition.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:Regulatory mandate by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is CC is passing it off as a local program. Governments and corporations fight free press mainly because it's much harder to oppose the unknown. What is really needed is to ensure the program is clearly announced as a syndicated program, whether or not it is tailored for the local song order. Without knowledge, people aren't really voting for or against it, they're just assuming Carson did a whole show just for their town, and support or don't support based on that erroneous assumption.

      Shooting the whole story down because it was brought up by a union is fairly short-sighted. Obviously, they are going to try to fight for their members - that's the whole point of a union. Granted, fighting for another hour for a local DJ is less grandiose than fighting for safe working conditions. Union's can do stupid things. There's one grocery worker union here that pickets a Super-K, even though the workers inside don't want to be union. And that shipping shutdown a few months ago. So while whether we should or shouldn't care about the union is one issue, truth in broadcasting is the larger issue.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    5. Re:Regulatory mandate by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ketchup isn't a vegetable? Oh, crap! My food pyramid is collapsing!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:Regulatory mandate by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      well, "appeasing union labour's job needs" better be there concern unless all the fat-rich bosses want to try and work the stations themselves... if they dont like dealing with Organized Labour, they can fucking starve. Have you ever heard the axiom "The Workers create the Wealth"?

      as for voting with your "$" - its an idiotic idea created by plutocrats - dont be so damned foolish.

      Should people pay for their "justice" by the policing they do themselves? or maybe by the laws they write? or maybe by the people they report to the Home-Land Security Office? what are you talking about..?

    7. Re:Regulatory mandate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/there/their

    8. Re:Regulatory mandate by Aine · · Score: 1

      Radio frequencies are owned by the PUBLIC and licensed to the radio stations for a fee. These are YOUR airwaves, not theirs, and not the record labels'. People seem to forget that.

      The Music Industry would be just as happy if they didn't have to deal with living people, other than taking in all their money. Record labels are gleeful when an artist dies, they can repackage, remix, and remarket all their music without having to deal with a whiney, demanding artist. Radio stations are happy to have syndicated content so they don't have to deal with whiney, demanding DJ's and fans. Clear Channel takes it a step further with digitally created Carson Daley "local" shows. Carson Daley could die tomorrow and Clear Channel could go on producing his shows for another twenty years without having to deal with him at all... and save paying his salary as well.

      --
      So far left, I'm right.
    9. Re:Regulatory mandate by Durindana · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Let's not forget - on Slashdot, of all places! - that broadcasters, even Clear Channel, have obligations to the public in return for their use of our public property: the EM spectrum. Holding them to that is far more important than saving individual radio-broadcaster jobs.

  35. Hmmmmm by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    I don't see why they don't just sit Carson down and read through a dictionary, a list of artists, a lists of songs, common phrases used for countdowns, and common phrases in general - so you could essentially write the script and plop each single word or phrase in there. Didn't IBM or somebody have synthesized speech software that used actual voice audio samples of all possible vowels? I remember reading that they basically paid these people to sit down and read a lot of shit so they could make whatever they wanted with their voices. Why don't they just do that for Carson Daly?

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:Hmmmmm by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Even better - it would be cheaper to hire some smuck, just call him Carson Daly, and let him read the stuff...

      Of course, Carson would complain, but the only people with a legitimate complaint would be Carson's fans who would be defrauded...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    2. Re:Hmmmmm by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      Of.. course.. he would .... sound .. like . one of those .. phone . help .. system .... voices.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
  36. porn stars by AssFace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand why this isn't done across the board with porn stars. considering how far they have come in 3d these days - just scan in a model for cheap and then they can do far more work.
    hell, you could even get rough mo-cap done once at a franction of the cost of needing her around all the time.
    the audio is obviously even easier than the carson thing.

    hell - you could have a system where you customize it so that the person watching it can choose what they want - color hair, skin tone, % bodyfat, etc.
    or even to the point of doing famous people, etc.

    is it still cheaper to pay real people to do it all?
    I could see if the technology wasn't there, but it would seem people would line up even at the level of playstation is right now.

    then again, I'm not really all that much into porn, so perhaps this is already out there and I'm just out of the loop.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:porn stars by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>Is it still cheaper to pay real people to do it all?

      Let's see..

      CGI rendered porn model - millions in development, artwork and rendering time, plus expensive render farms to do the computations.

      Drug addict in her late teens - $20 worth of crack and a Sony Handycam.

      Yes, it's cheaper.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:porn stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering how far they have come in 3d these days

      I thought most forms of porn (photographic, video etc) only let you see how far they come in 2d these days.

    3. Re:porn stars by AssFace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, yeah - were that the case, then yes that would be cheaper. but on the higher level porn - they aren't crack addicts working for $20 - they are working at $1000/hr and up.

      but to do it at the level of a game in terms of graphics (real time rendering) it would not cost nearly that - not to mention that once you have one model developed - you effectively have an infinite number (changing their look is easy once it is there).

      I would put it more at development of a solid model and perhaps viewing engine at $100,000 and a year.
      Once done you could do a crapload of stuff and make it customizable, as well as making a subscriber interface (EverQuest with sex).

      I have worked with the game technologies and know what is there, and have talked to people on the outside of porn well enough to know that your view of it is misguided (not saying that there aren't drug addicts in the industry - eps at lower levels).

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    4. Re:porn stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:porn stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      as well as making a subscriber interface (EverQuest with sex)

      Do a web search for "3dslut" and d/l the demo. Scary, eh?

    6. Re:porn stars by wilson_c · · Score: 1

      Nah, sorry. An average successful porn star will probably make $1000 for a straight scene. Oral sex and girl/girl will pay considerably less. An anal scene will pay a bit more. Remember that, regardless of how long the scene lasts, it's going to take a while to set up camera and lights, plan everything out, and do all of the necessary takes before breaking set. So these are far from hourly rates.

      Men - at least in straight porn - get paid almost nothing. Very often just a day rate of $150 or so unless they're a real selling point (hard to do for most straight porn)

      The cost of production for most porn is $10,000-15,000 for a 90 minute tape, featuring 5-7 seven scenes.

      Building a model and tweaking the skin weighting (you'd have to do extensive weighting to accomodate a wide range of positions) would take a lot of time and money. Those costs aside, you'd still have to deal with motion capture. If you capture pantomimed motion (of two separate individuals), it probably won't be convincing (or very sexy). Motion capture data always needs to be cleaned and massaged. These are not tasks for Johnny Camcorder.

      Even after you have an efficient and bug-free pipeline worked out, you're still going to be spending a few days of an expensive TD's time for every hour of video. And it would be crappy video: flat lighting, hardware rendered models, blocky hair. Mmmmm, sexy sounding, isn't it?

      And for the record, I know of few crack-addled porn stars, but on the other hand I don't think I've ever met one who didn't use cocaine at the drop of a hat.

    7. Re:porn stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RealDoll $6k up front (www.realdoll.com) - but lasts a lot longer than $20 worth of crack.

      Still need the handycam...

  37. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    context galore, including kuro5hin article
    http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en &lr=&ie=U TF-8&oe=utf-8&safe=off&q=%27in+soviet+russia%27+jo kes&btnG=Google+Search
    im too lazy to put in tags

  38. So Carson Daly is a robot? by daemonc · · Score: 1

    I suspected as much...

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
  39. Use their tools against them. by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's to stop some enterprising folk from making their own, highly subversive versions of Carson Daly from recordings of his show?

    What's to stop those recordings from being either broadcast locally from pirate rigs, or injected into a Clear Channel satellite feed?

    Ok, maybe state and federal laws and the wrath of the FCC, if you care about that kind of thing.

    1. Re:Use their tools against them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone would have to take the time to sample and make the version.

      Do you have that kind of time?

    2. Re:Use their tools against them. by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Unless you have personal access to Carson Daly, you wouldn't be able to create a database of pristine Carson phrases.

      If you listen to the show, you'll notice that you never ever hear Carson without a music bed. That's for two reasons:

      1. To cover up small differences in voice tone and room ambience between the different clips
      2. To stop you from making your parody

    3. Re:Use their tools against them. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I've done telephoney apps with prerecorded phrases strung together, and it's very hard to get it to sound natural. It tends to sound like the verbal equivilent of a ransom note. Even the phone companies (which have done serious research into this sort of thing, again to replace people) haven't got it quite right.

      I wonder how much processing they have to do to "make it fit"?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Use their tools against them. by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I've done telephone apps with prerecorded phrases strung together too. The key to making it sound natural is to really cut your samples tight. It also helps if your phone interface can play back-to-back signal without gaps or clicks.

      The first version sounded terrible; after a few months I re-recorded everything speaking fairly fast and cutting the ends of each sample right back to audio. When I'd done that it sounded better than a lot of commercial systems I've heard.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  40. DJ 3000 from the Simpsons? by Spamlent+Green · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this remind anyone of the DJ 3000 from the Simpsons episode "Bart gets an elephant" ?

    Boss: This is the DJ 3000. It plays CDs automatically, and it has three distinct varieties of inane chatter.
    [presses a button]
    DJ 3000: [stilted] Hey, hey. How about that weather out there?

    Woah! _That_ was the caller from hell.

    Well, hot dog! We have a weiner.

    Bill: Man, that thing's great!

    Marty: _Don't_ praise the machine!

    Boss: If you don't get that kid an elephant by tomorrow, the DJ 3000 gets your job.

    [Marty punches it]

    DJ 3000: Those clowns in congress did it again. What a bunch of clowns.

    Bill: [laughs] How does it keep up with the news like that?

    1. Re:DJ 3000 from the Simpsons? by milletre · · Score: 1

      The preferred spelling of 'weiner' is w-I-E-n-e-r.

    2. Re:DJ 3000 from the Simpsons? by wct · · Score: 1

      ...although weiner is an acceptable ethnic variation. :)

  41. Moviephone by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

    What?!? Are you also telling me that the guy on AOL MoviePhone isn't live? That they just cobble his sentences together with... a computer! This can't be happening! To think I thought we had something special together.

  42. The real question is.... by JDRipper · · Score: 0

    Did Tara Reid have to dump him eleven times?

    --
    "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
  43. Exploding heads is bad enoug, but... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Max Headroom always makes me think of one of the most disgusting scenes I have ever seen in a movie: Somebody eating cold noodles (ravioli?) directly out of the can.

    Urgh!

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Exploding heads is bad enoug, but... by johnstown · · Score: 1

      How the hell do you eat it?

    2. Re:Exploding heads is bad enoug, but... by MROD · · Score: 1

      It was tinned spagetti.. Probably Heinz.

      Hmm.. the wonders of spagetti on toast... or alphabeti spagetti...

      Welcome to the wonderful world of 1970's/80's british tinned cuisine.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    3. Re:Exploding heads is bad enoug, but... by Animus+Howard · · Score: 1

      > one of the most disgusting scenes I have ever
      > seen in a movie: Somebody eating cold noodles
      > (ravioli?) directly out of the can.

      If that's the most disgusting thing you have ever seen you really need to get out more.

      Go see Hannibal.

      Or for one of the first digital celebrities, go see The Shining and watch for "Tony".

  44. Network 23... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    23 Skidoo

  45. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh crap!

    I jsut realized, thanks to you, that the in soveit russia things were jokes!

    I'd been taking them seriuosly!

  46. The Idoru? by xyu · · Score: 1

    What's she up to now?

  47. Damn! Fooled Again! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    From the first sentence, I thought Max was back!

    I'd really like to see if Amanda Pays is as hot these days as she was then...

    Max Headroom was a great show. Best line:

    "You remember when we said there was no future? Well, this is it!"

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  48. Carson's Next Recording by FosterKanig · · Score: 1

    Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,ah,uh,oh,eeh,wah,tk,ck,bl,fd,ok, umm,brit,ney,sp,ears,lo,ook,pen,os,is,us,hizz,ouse ,word

  49. If you are not old enough (or American enough)... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    ... to remember Max Headroom you can catch the 80's TV show on TechTV late at night. Set the Tivo/VCR if you are one of those sleeping persons.

    In short Max Headroom was a computerized head that spoke to you from a TV (played by Matt Frewer, later on Psi Factor). I guess the Max Headroom charcter started either as a spokesperson for Coke or a MTV thing. I didn't have cable TV back then so i don't remember where he started. Eventually they created a TV show around him.

  50. ClearChannel Take Note!! IDEA of the CENTURY! by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    D. J. Stephen Hawking.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:ClearChannel Take Note!! IDEA of the CENTURY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about missing a sense of humor... Troll indeed

    2. Re:ClearChannel Take Note!! IDEA of the CENTURY! by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Already been done.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  51. I have nothing to add to this conversation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well i'll add Doyouwant2cds.com

  52. Can't resist, but I'll do it at 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In Soviet Russia, jokes take you seriously!

    unitron
    5733

  53. But we got BlipVerts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We just call them java pop-ups instead.

    Max was cool, but all cool TV shows get cancelled. Bad TV shows live forever.

  54. Not exactly Max Headroom but.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Try here and click on the video reports on top right.

    Okay, she's got all the personality of Clippy, but give it time.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  55. Re:My stupidity is reaching new heights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confused by Blair? Baffled by Bush?

    Join the anti war protest in Hyde Park, London on Saturday 15th of February at one o'clock. Probably the largest ever demo to be held in England, bring your friends for the booze, batons and birds.

    Largest piss up ever, followed by one of the largest parties ever, and closed with the largest fireworks displays ever in Baghdad as the governments once again ignore the opinions of the general populace.

  56. Max Headroom! by payndz · · Score: 1

    How could any s-s-s-self-respecting ggggggggeek not have h/AH!/AH!/AH!/[strange laugh] have heard of M-M-M-Max Head(ead/ead)room? Haven't you seenN!/N!/N! BTTF2? (Ach!/Ach!) 2? [crrrk] 2?

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  57. May Clearchannel die so *real* radio might live! by GodsMadClown · · Score: 1

    Free your mind with genuine music played by genuine people.

    www.radioparadise.com

    Point your MP3 player to http://205.188.209.193:80

  58. area man concussed by pornsite popup window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Had it coming," say police.

  59. What Clear Channel Communications has on it's site by Ezekiel+Zachariah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went to CCC's site and they had this link about a press release on music piracy (an always fun topic here at /.) so I read it, and low and behold there are some nice comments from the heads of various record companys. Some of the statements are rather bland, but a few really show the twists they want to make to common sense. Anyways, check them out.

    Record Labels Speak Out
    The recording industry, including the labels and their artists, lose millions of dollars a
    year to Internet theft. According to information released by the RIAA, US music
    shipments in the first half of 2002 were off 10% over the same period in 2001, with sales
    down nearly 7%. Clear Channel's move to lead the radio industry in publicizing the issue
    of music piracy struck a chord among the record labels:
    *The dip in sales couldn't be from poor product, could it? just a thought. Oh, and I always thought you had to have something to "lose" it.*

    Arista Records, Antonio "L.A." Reid, President and CEO
    "The plague of music piracy is spreading in geometric numbers and the industry is faced
    with the challenge of turning around the mind-set of a generation that thinks its 'cool' to
    obtain recorded music for free. Arista Records, its staff and its artists all support Clear
    Channel's efforts to bring the message across in a way that demands radio listeners'
    attention and dares them to confront a serious issue."
    *Ok, as a guy who grew up taping music from the radio, I would like to point out that my generation started this trend. Sheesh, give credit where credit is due.*

    Atlantic Records, Craig Kallman, Co -President
    "Everyone involved in music has to commend Clear Channel for partnering with our
    artists to get the truth out about Internet piracy and the terrible impact that it's having on
    musicians. Their PSAs are humanizing an injustice that threatens every musician's
    livelihood."
    *"...humanizing an injustice..."? Umm, right. If you buy this I am running a "Old Retired Senator's Fund", which aims to soften the blow of leaving public office.*

    Columbia Records, Charlie Walk, Executive Vice President Promotion
    "We're happy to see Clear Channel coming on board and educating young fans that music
    has real value that should not be taken for granted. Artists deserve to be compensated for
    the music they create, just like anyone else deserves to be paid for the work that they do."
    *Education? Re-Education more like.*

    Elektra Entertainment Group, Sylvia Rhone, Chairman/CEO
    "Illegal downloading and other forms of music piracy have had a devastating effect on
    consumers perception and value of music. With Clear Channel's enormous reach of over
    100 million listeners, they possess the ideal platform to educate consumers about the
    negative impact of Internet music piracy."
    *This is my favorite. "..devastating effect on the consumers perception and value of music.". I think its ok for consumers to decide that your product is over-priced and lacking in quality. I'm pretty radical though.*

    RCA Music Group, Clive Davis, Chairman
    "Clear Channel's efforts to educate the consumer on the destructive impact of Internet
    music piracy will be invaluable. We must protect our creative community even from well
    meaning fans who just don't know that with every file they download or CD they burn,
    they are undermining the future of the very music they profess to love."
    *I don't love music. I enjoy it. Like I enjoy ice cream and a good philly cheesesteak.*

    Pardon the editorials, I couldn't resist (ok, I could have if I wanted to, but I didn't).

    --
    "/. = :)"
  60. Re:We've already got Blipverts! by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you watch the Discovery Channel or TLC you've no doubt seen blipverts. You know, where an obviously mechanically processed human voice comes on and speaks at very high speed. So fast that it requires a great cognitive effort to decipher what is being said.

    Because when I watch TV I want to veg out (otherwise I'd be on my computer, or reading) I find these blipverts to be very annoying. In fact I find them to be the most offensive form of television advertising that I've ever come across. So much so, that I usually turn the channel instantly. I may ordinarily channel surf, but when I see those Discovery blipverts, you've never seen me move so fast for the remote!

    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  61. radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, everyone does in fact realise that radio sucks. What they DON'T realise is that it sucks because Clear Channel now owns MOST radio stations. Here in the Dallas/Fort Worth area we had, just 5-6 years ago, one of the best collections of radio stations in the country. Three different rock stations trying to outdo each other. It was great. All the stations had shows highlighting local artists, they all had distinct personalities that defined the station, and they all had character. Now Clear Channel owns two of those stations, and the other died. Clear Channel also owns (IIRC) a classic rock station and a couple of country stations here. The shittiest thing is that all the rock stations play the same damn things! Ozzy, Sabbath, AC/DC, Led Zepplin... this area is a radio wasteland now. Radio should be treated like newspapers are. Companies should not be allowed to own more than one in any market.

    That said, I really don't see the problem with the Carson Daly thing aside from the fact that he annoys the crap out of me. It's no different than the interviews you see with actors where you have the local TV reporter talking with someone, then a half hour later you see the same question being answered the exact same way when asked by a different reporter on another station. It's just more pointless crap that idiotic companies do that they think makes people listen. Here's a tip: QUIT PLAYING SHITTY MUSIC. That will do more than anything Carson Daly could ever do.

  62. Aki from Final Fantasy movie by Ryu2 · · Score: 1

    I think Aki must deserve a mention... it's probably the first digital celebrity featured in Maxim's Top 100 and to pose nude as well. Woo!

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  63. format strings by trb · · Score: 1
    sounds like voice tracking is the audio equivalent of printf format strings:
    for (i=10; i>0; i--)
    audio_printf("coming in at number %d, %s\n", i, songname[i]);
    1. Re:format strings by tchapin · · Score: 1

      You could do that pretty easily in VoiceXML.

      Actually, this whole topic is a lot like what the speech rec telephony market has been doing for years.

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
  64. Turning test? by MountainLogic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If a generic local DJ can be replaced with such a simple tool then we are not loosing much. If the most brain-dead table look-up can pass the Turing test then perhaps local DJs need to do their homework, learn more about their community and really have somthing to offer.

    Rather than describe this as wiz-bang tech, I'd describe it as poor content production by local DJs. Don't get me wrong, I do want good local content. I do not want junk generic content spewed by a "local DJ" (read moved in from out of state last week).

  65. Radio sucks. by Maul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't listen to the radio any more. I'm tired of the increasingly stupid DJ personalities, the ads for stuff I'll never buy, and the same songs being played over and over. To top it off, I dislike static.

    Now they are making the stupid DJ personalities even worse by making them entirely generic. Yay.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:Radio sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude everything except talk radio and dance radio has been dead for years.

      Even dance radio sucks. Repeatitive thats why.
      I used to work in a sweatshop in Louisiana.

      And they used to play the same 5 songs all day long over and over again with more and more and more repeated commercials behind them.

      So I decided to stop sucking clean salty socks for a living and get a real job as a Linux Admin at a local university. Now I have a 100ft dong and I can order round all my henchmen and act like a right prick with no consequence. Cause after all it's not corporate America.

      I can even play mp3's on my dong shaped cellphone.
      It's shiny..

      I listen to this song over and over till I wet my self " Video killed the radio Star"

  66. ot: duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    information wants to be free.

    there is no logical contradiction.

    therefore, you have only made a fool of yourself.

    1. Re:ot: duh! by mosch · · Score: 1
      could you please free your name, address, and social security number?

      i saw a plasma tv that wants to be free.

    2. Re:ot: duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you tell your mom I have something with a zipper that wants to be free?

    3. Re:ot: duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  67. who needs blipverts? by msouth · · Score: 1

    my head explodes every time I fail to divert the little'ns' attention and switch off the television before the Barney song plays.

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  68. Voices! by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    Fuck Daly, "hire" Big Url from Soma FM! Use a damn macintosh and pick Fred.

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  69. Was anyone fooled? by rlsnyder · · Score: 1

    The "who was fooled by this factor" seems a more reasonable complaint than the whole job thing. Do listeners really think this Carson dude was actually "servicing" their area personally? Like he cared or something?

    About one in every 10 or so station breaks on the local classic rock station is some celebrity telling me I'm listening to the "the home of classic rock, W???". Do I think they give a shit? Is the station legitimately trying to pull the wool over my eyes and make me think that Ozzy or Mick Jagger came to my area, drove around, saw the sites, fell in love, bought a summer home, listened to the "home of classic rock", and decided to go lend their whole-hearted support?

    Radio is artificial, like all media. They provide local news, weather, and topics of local interest. But the people who deliver this could be anyone, anywhere, and may or may not give a rats ass.

    And no one is confused by this, at least no one with half a brain. "Servicing the local area" is just noise. It's money, somehow, this whole thing is that someone ain't getting money they think they should.

    1. Re:Was anyone fooled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You are forgeting that the broadcast frequiencies were given to companies under the agreement that they would use them at least partialy as public service. The issue here is that they have been ducking this requirenment.

  70. Re:If you are not old enough (or American enough). by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Narf! "American enough"? Max started in Britain. (And that weird accent he has is Canadian.) I've got the original 1h movie version.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  71. Always dislike ClearChannel by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whatever else, it almost always is correct to come away from any situation disliking ClearChannel. They have single-handedly destroyed any notion of local, unique radio, radio with identity, personality, vision. They've also eliminated any actual relationship between the radio stations they control and the communities that they supposedly serve. Through economy of scale and massive undercutting if necessary, they can drive any actual local competition out of business. And while they didn't start the corporate focus group designed playlist, they have perfected it as a method of eliminating anything approaching quality in radio programming. The have blanded out radio to an unprecedented extent. Country is usually sited as the best example. Despite the acclaim and great sales of the soundtrack of "Oh Brother, Where Art Thou" and the Dixie Chicks "Home", any other examples of roots/traditional country music can't get two seconds of airtime unless they hold someone hostage. And that's difficult to do because most ClearChannel programming comes from centralized hubs that are mostly computerized.

    Easy way to understand it: ClearChannel is like Microsoft, except there is no open source radio (except the Internet, which is being priced out of existence).

    1. Re:Always dislike ClearChannel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually suspect that if there is any truth to the RIAA's claims of dropping CD sales, it stems mostly from the effect ClearChannel has had on radio in recent years.

    2. Re:Always dislike ClearChannel by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 1

      Well, regardless of the poor rating of my original post, this seems to clear it enough for me. I suppose I'm a moron about it since I never really listened to the radio. This would, perhaps, also explain WHY I don't listen to the radio...

      Anyhow, I'm redundant so no use going further. ;)

      --
      No I'm not trolling.
  72. Re:If you are not old enough (or American enough). by BlankTim · · Score: 1

    Actually, MTV and the Coke commercials came *after* the show, but otherwise you are correct.

    Of course my fave charecter was Reg, Hence my name. ^.^

    --
    Just once, I'd like it if someone called me "Sir".
    Without adding, "You're creating a scene."
  73. A show SO good it can be done by machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it tells you something about the quality of Carson Daly's show when a machine can create a show by clipping together a bunch of sound-bites, song titles and artist's names. Of course it also tells you something about the quality of its listeners who are fooled by it. :)

  74. Max Headroom Was Genius by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ever since I started watching Max Headroom when Tech TV started to rerun it, I've noticed something. It's distrubing how accurate it is. ALL the major networks seem to be trying to be major news outlets, but they are just ads. We are getting fed more and more commercials, Blipverts are surely comming soon. And a few major companies seem to controll just about everything. How long before ZikZak's... I mean McD's... starts giving out neurostimulator bracelets? Also, is it just me or is TV getting dumber and dumber, yet more and more popular. Am I the only one who thinks that they are testing out the technology that was used to make "Wack-its" popular on the show.

    The more "old" sci-fi type stuff I watch, the more erie it is how similar we've become. How long untill we're not ALLOWED to turn off our TVs? How long before our TVs watch what WE'RE doing so advertisers can see what effect they're having? How long before Max is invading MY TV screen?

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Max Headroom Was Genius by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      How long untill we're not ALLOWED to turn off our TVs?

      I don't think it will come to a point where we won't be able to turn off our TVs. Rather, advertising will become so prevalent that you won't be able to look anywhere without seeing an ad. The phrase I saw was "eyeballs and spare time being auctioned off to the highest bidder."

      The TV commercial is dying due to TiVo and reduced viewership in general; advertisers are already exploring new places to put ads. I already see scrolling banner ads during TNN shows and The Thunderbirds on TechTV. I imagine the ultimate will be when they are able to beam ads directly into our retinas as we walk by; like Minority Report, only worse.

    2. Re:Max Headroom Was Genius by renecarlos · · Score: 1

      >is it just me or is TV getting dumber and dumber

      You're outgrowing TV, consider yourself blessed. The red pill it ain't, but you free up a lot of time and mindshare once you just say "who gives a rat's ass who'd f*cking Rachel this week."

      >How long untill we're not ALLOWED to turn off our TVs? How long before our TVs watch what WE'RE doing so advertisers can see what effect they're having?

      Jamie Kellner (Turner, and therefore TBS, WB, Cartoon Network, the whole CNN league) said in an interview with Inside:

      "I guess there's a certain amount of tolerance for going to the bathroom..."

      And both Tivo and Replay PVRs record your usage. Both have modem lines; Tivo expressly states that it logs your data and demographics.

    3. Re:Max Headroom Was Genius by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I'd love to rewatch the whole series. Are they reshowing the whole 17? Alas, I don't believe in the cable thing, and I don't know if the Canadian Space channel is showing it.

      I suspect that it stands up well over time because they avoided much that would date the show, while still getting in cute references.

      There's even a reference that I only noticed recently. The two body snatchers (in the British pilot, at least) are obviously based on the infamous historical body snatchers Burke and Hare (Interesting story).

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  75. blipvert targets by writertype · · Score: 1
    Now we just have to wait for the blipverts to start making consumer's heads explode."

    As long as one of those "consumers" is Carson Daly...

  76. Re:What Clear Channel Communications has on it's s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the truth out about Internet piracy and the terrible impact that it's having on
    musicians.

    What terrible impact is that? Realising that they really DON'T have to go through a label to get their music heard? God forbid that should happen.

    We must protect our creative community even from well
    meaning fans who just don't know that with every file they download or CD they burn,
    they are undermining the future of the very music they profess to love.

    Bullshit, you don't give a fuck about music. You are protecting your bottom line don't even pretend you aren't, fuckers.

    Yes, I do know they can't hear my bitching, but what the hell. ;)

    It's shit like this that pisses me off severely. Corporate morons thinking they know a fucking thing about what drives music and musicians. For the REAL musicians out there it truly isn't about money, it's just about making some noise. Record companies need to realise they're fucking doomed if they continue with this bullshit parade they're on. I'm still waiting for one of these ill-regulated banks (that is ALL a record label is) to nut up and dive into distributing music online for free. I don't mean SOME of it, I mean FUCKING ALL OF IT. There are MANY albums I own that I had as MP3's before I bought the album. I went out and bought the albums simply because I thought the artists in questions were worth supporting. According to the RIAA and other fucktards like them, I'm a damn weirdo because I prefer not to waste my money on total shit that they ram down our throats. When these labels stop promoting the next big thing and realise that there are THOUSANDS of excellent artists that would sell a SHITLOAD of records if they had some fucking backing, THEN maybe we'll talk. Until then, I think I'll go download Kazaa.

  77. And the award for... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    'Vaguest Description' goes to "Digital Celebrities""/ for this amazing performance:

    "Carson Daly's simulacrum is the new Max Headroom. I guess this makes Clear Channel Communications the current embodiment of Network 23? Now we just have to wait for the blipverts to start making consumer's heads explode."


    Not only were the pop-culture references so obscure that people were forced to demand assistance from Google, but they also had to RTFA in order to provide ANY useful insight!

    Partridge was kind enough to send me his accepatance speech, it reads:

    "I'm so pleased to accept this reward! I feel just like Kryten did when he was forced to wash 800 bedsheets as part of his sentence."
    1. Re:And the award for... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Partridge was kind enough to send me his accepatance speech, it reads:

      "I'm so pleased to accept this reward! I feel just like Kryten did when he was forced to wash 800 bedsheets as part of his sentence." "


      Ha!! Man. There's going to be like 2 people on the whole planet that get that reference. Sadly, I'm the other one. Hopefully one day I'll move out of my parent's house.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:And the award for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Googling Carson Daly I could understand, but needing to Google Max Headroom? What, your TV gets something other than TechTV?

    3. Re:And the award for... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I got it, but I had help from Spare Head #2.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:And the award for... by demon · · Score: 1

      "I'm so pleased to accept this reward! I feel just like Kryten did when he was forced to wash 800 bedsheets as part of his sentence."

      Does anyone know wtf he's talking about here? I seriously can't figure it out.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    5. Re:And the award for... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "...but needing to Google Max Headroom? What, your TV gets something other than TechTV?"

      I was a little kid when Max Headroom was on. I certainly didn't pick up on the subtleties of it. As for TechTV, I'm not claiming I don't get it, but I've never run across it. I suppose I can look in the TV Guide and see what channel it is.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:And the award for... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Does anyone know wtf he's talking about here? I seriously can't figure it out."

      It's from the BBC show Red Dwarf. Though you may have heard of it, and possibly even seen it on Public Broadcasting, the last season (season 8) is (probably) a rare thing to have seen.

      Kryten is a mechanoid house-keeping robot. In season 8, he along with the Cat, Lister, Rimmer, Holly, and Kochanski were thrown into jail for endangering the ship. One of the punishment tasks for Kryten was to launder something like 800 bedsheets. But since he's programmed to do that, he found the job quite pleasant as he waas completing his program. He couldn't understand why he was being rewarded. Hopefully that last line clarifies why I chose that reference to the article's poster, heh.

      Smug Mode: My award post was very clever.

      Lie Mode: You have a very nice haircut.

    7. Re:And the award for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we have to spell it out for you?

      How's this:

      Carson Daly (The big celebrity who had his start on MTV)'s simulacrum (doppelgager or virtual duplicate for those of you without a dictionary) is the new Max Headroom (80's TV show involving a simulacrum of a TV personality).

      Does this make Clear channel communications (Carson Daly's parent company) the new Network 23 (The big television station from the TV series).

      And you call yourself a nerd. Max Headroom is NOT an obscure popcultural reference for nerds. It's bread and butter.

  78. wait a minute... by jmorse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...I thought Carson Daly was a robot.

    I guess the execs at MTV no longer need to rely on force-feeding the VJs qualudes to get them to push Britney Spears and other crap.

    How long before the Republicans use this to make a composite of Clinton or Gore endorsing all of Bush's policies...oh, wait, they don't need to do that. Clinton and Gore already do endorse most of Bush's policies...


    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
  79. Re:Wha? by MROD · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK, picture this.. an alternative reality (20 seconds in the future) where law and order have broken down and the only power is wielded by huge media corporations. The ratings are measured in real time second by second and programmes are designed and implemented to get the most audience using the basest TV formats.

    Now, enter Edison Carter, the on the spot reporter for Network 23 who carries his own camera and is controlled by his director in Network 23's offices.

    Network 23 are using high intensity, high speed "blipverts" to force people to watch the commercials giving them no time to change to other channels.

    Unfortunately for Network 23, they also cause people who overdose on the blipverts to have their head explode.. it's doubly unfortunate that Edison Carter is sniffing out the story and Edison is also Network 23's highest ratings puller.. so with the help of their pet geek, they devise the idea of a virtual Edison Carter, getting rid of the original (at the body bank).

    Anyway, to cut a long story short, Max Headroom is created by a not so well transfered personality from Edison Carter after he has been knocked out when trying to escape from Network 23's underground car park, the last image he had seen was the barrier with the warning sign "Max Headroom ? feet."

    There is far more to the original 1985(?) Channel 4 production which involves the escape of both Edison Carter and Max Headroom from Network 23.

    The american market got a rejigged version which was no-where as good. The spin-off from which was The Max Headroom Show.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  80. Ramsey Clark (Patriotic): +1, Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General,
    has drawn up articles of impeachment against Bush,
    Cheney, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. There is a
    petition being organized and these will be
    hand delivered to the Democratic leaders and
    the judiciary committee. To sign the petition go
    to Impeach Bush et al.

    There you can read the articles and sign
    the petition.

    Peace,
    W00t

  81. 20 Minutes into Future.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TV Watches you!

  82. Digital Editing by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny
    WE've seen Mr. Burns tell Smithers how good he is at turning him on...

    We've heard Mr Bush call the American people evil, and terrorists,

    We've seen OJ Simpson in Fuzzy Bunny slippers...

    Why should we not expect Carson Daily to get manipulated up the wazoo?

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  83. Ron Headrest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    So far no one seems to have mentioned Gary Trudeau's Ronald Reagan alter-ego on "Doonesbury,"
    "Ron Headrest":

    "I'll s-s-set up illegal covert operations and lie about them to Congress and the American p-p-people! If detected I promise to falsify documents, shred evidence and preserve plausible de-de-deniability! Then I'll take the Fifth! But with moist eyes! And selflessly ...!"

  84. Network "Programming" by sbillard · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit offended by this. This form of entertainment for the masses is nothing more than a regionalized extract of speech phrases recorded by some MTV fun boy?!?!?! WTF?!?

    Another poster above knows of a common practice of fabricating celebrity interviews by splicing their sound bites with opportunistic questions.

    Much of my news (print, TV, and radio) comes with a slant, a spin, or is presented from a single point of view.

    Video editing and CGI-annimation have gotten so good it is hard to tell what is real and what is not. This is especially true for big-budget movies, but the technology is getting cheaper and cheaper. Anyone see those Matrix Reloaded trailers? Wow!

    It seems as though everything we see and hear is heavily processed/filtered before it gets to our brains. Almost as if the mass-media outlets (and perhaps big govt) don't want us to think for ourselves. I know I've got offtopic here.

    It is why I only watch two things on TV anymore.
    1. Cartoons. They are fake and obviously so. There is no way I am going to watch a "REALITY SHOW" as seen through my fucking TV screen. This started for me with the MTV show called "Real World". HA! Real? and on TV?!?!
    2. Live sports. The only fake or scripted thing about my professional sports is the yellow first-down line they programmatically paint on the field. Sporting events cannot be faked because the events/outcome are corrobated by thousands of attendees. Sure, there is a 7 second delay built into the delivery, but nobody can change the outcome or manipulate the drama.

    I am very offended and concerned about this. I don't give a shit about the union filing the complaint. I worry about the things my son will "learn" from this form of brainwashing.

    1. Re:Network "Programming" by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

      Um... if you mention cartoons, then why not other fiction shows? They claim to be fake, too.. and people accept special effects just fine...

  85. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The picture of the goatse guy made my roommate's head explode the first time I naively followed the link. I captured the event for posterity with a digicam. I'd provide a link, but it's a really disgusting picture.

  86. It all makes sense now... by Kozz · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I mean, they don't even NEED Carson Daly himself. They just bought his brain on eBay.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  87. virtual porn stars by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the large start-up cost is probably one of the prohibitive factors. Nobody's going to finance a setup like that when it's entirely possible that the wanking public will HATE the virtual stars and avoid the videos like the plague (or more appropriately, gonnorrhea). Vivid Video aren't going to risk their current, wildly lucrative production model on the off chance that synthespians can make it in pr0n. From what I understand, a lot of pr0n consumers have favourite stars, whom they creepily worship and follow closely (literally, in some cases). None of that lot would likely take too well to virtual stars when they're used to the Jenna Jamesons and others of the current biz.

    Also, as mentioned it's a small elite who command high prices for doing porn videos. There's a huge low-budget industry which consists of some guy paying a girl to have sex with him while _he_ films it. I mean - no cameraman - how much more low-budget can you go? Just a couple hundred to the girl, a few bucks for some pina colada mix* and poof! You have video you can sell or put on your own web site. And people are buying, so clearly the synthespians are not needed there either.

    * yes, for that. How do I know all this? The diary of a low-budget pornographer (mostly not safe for work)...

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:virtual porn stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great site, isn't it?
      That guy had me hooked on his funny ass site.

  88. Why the union's position is important by ctwxman · · Score: 1

    The union and the station owner entered into a collective bargaining agreement. Both sides gave and took. But, it was all predicated on certain actions on both sides... such as the company's agreeing not to voice track.

    If this is a problem for the station owner, renegotiate the agreement. However, it is wrong for any party to a contract to arbitrarily decide to change the terms and conditions.

    If AFTRA is correct, the company will be forced to stop and possibly subject to sanctions.

    (BTW - I am an AFTRA member and have been a negotiator between AFTRA and my employer for nearly 20 years)

  89. More annoying than Carrot Top? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow!

  90. Listening to it right now by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

    Thats amazing, I thought it was actually local.(I am in the NY listening area) It is really localized well. He mentions other z100(my local clearchannel station) dj's, and their "song of the day". Wow. Honest to god I would have never known it from any other countdown show on the station.

    --
    What signature defines me as a person?
  91. OT: Shipping lockout by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    It's annoying that it has to be said again and again and again: It was the DOCK OWNERS who locked out the workers. The workers did NOT go on strike and they didn't walk out. The owners pre-emptively locked them out.

    I'm not going to get into the other issues involved.

    1. Re:OT: Shipping lockout by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      OK, I will admit that was part of stream-of-consciousness, but I accidentally helped my own point: sometimes it's easy to focus on a small part of an issue and miss the bigger problems.

      (Okay, that is partially a CMA statement, but I think it does apply to both of our statements.)

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  92. Whoa! 1913! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Whoa! 1913! That must have been a way early version of the Players Handbook!

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  93. She ain't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    at least not without makeup...

    http://us.imdb.com/Name?Pays,+Amanda

    1. Re:She ain't... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Oh, I don't know, that Vegas picture doesn't indicate she looks too bad.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  94. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    READ IT!

  95. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um, i guess you cant grasp subtle sarcasm

  96. They're already doing this by ToastyKen · · Score: 1
    How long before our TVs watch what WE'RE doing so advertisers can see what effect they're having?

    I don't have a link handy, but I recall hearing about advertisers installing devices on freeways to detect what radio station you're listening to, so they can target advertising...

    1. Re:They're already doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't have a link handy, but I recall hearing about advertisers installing devices on freeways to detect what radio station you're listening to, so they can target advertising...

      ? How would anyone be able to detect (long distance) what frequency a receiver was tuned to, especially a relatively low-power one in a car?..

  97. It doesn't matter by Aexia · · Score: 1

    >>If the most brain-dead table look-up can pass the Turing test then perhaps local DJs need to do their homework, learn more about their community and really have somthing to offer.

    They're not being replaced because they're doing a bad job; they're being replaced because it's cheaper for Clear Channel(and other corps) to pay the salary of one generic DJ out of state than a hundred salaries for a hundred local DJs.

    Unless they're willing to do it for free, they can do all the homework they want; it won't make a difference.

  98. Foreign radio by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I am currently listening to a russian radio stations and I promise you that the clear channel doesn't reach that far yet. There are still real people making jokes and introducing songs. There are still some english-speaking countries. Is there Clear Channel in Canada, UK, Australia and Singapore?

  99. It's not the technology, it's the lies by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    I don't really understand the union dispute, well, i understand why they're upset, but i'm not sure how much legal say they have over the issue, however what seems more important to me is the truth in advertising issue. CCC is trying to convince people in multiple cities that Carson Daly is personally running their local top 10 show.

    If they told everyone that the program was just a manufactured conglomeration of soundbites recorded over a multi-year period and the audience was still okay with listening to it, that's fine. However CCC is doing their best to keep the issue out of the spotlight, they don't want their audiences having the ability to make an informed choice.

    My favorite independent radio station in LA just went bankrupt, and I'm pissed that there are three almost identical CCC stations wasting bandwidth broadcasting almost identical crap. Maybe it wouldn't make any difference, but maybe if CCC was forced to be upfront about how little they care about local audiences, then maybe people would wake up a little and start making some choices.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:It's not the technology, it's the lies by serutan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not as if local stations would try to fool their own viewers, say by taping news stories on location during the day, editing the footage back at the studio, and then sending the reporters back out at showtime to do "live reports" from the scene, consisting of introducing the tapes, which they could do just as well from a chair in the studio. Hah! Like the local viewing audience would let them get away with that one! Anyway, getting back to Carson Daly, the difference between him recording his top 10 show all at once and in little bits and pieces is, uhhhh...?

  100. That's OK with me! by aquarian · · Score: 1

    I don't care if this is all just a union ploy, or whatever else people are saying. If it saves us from the shitty radio we have now, it's OK by me.

  101. I can just see it now.... by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 1

    ...some listener in the middle of Iowa will be listening to a countdown and will eventually hear something like this:

    Carson Daly: "...and in the next spot in our countdown is..."

    Hollow Computer Voice: "....error in line 24...file not found...please contact an administrator..."

    Dolemite

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  102. Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got obsoleted by the advance of technology and my marketable job skills have become irrelevant. It happens. I do other stuff now. The DJs had better get over it and plan for the future, because it's coming whether they like it or not.

  103. I knew it. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    "several hours a week in a studio in his Manhattan apartment, reading scripts"

    You can just bet that, for 3/4ths of the shows, he's naked.

  104. Too much slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know you've been reading Slashdot too often when you see correct use of the words "lose" and "loose" and think they look funny...

  105. Fear and Loathing in my head... by DAQ42 · · Score: 2

    So, now we have one source for all our radio entertainment. Actually, it's more allow the lines that Clear Channel and the RIAA are dictating to us what is "popular" and what is "cool" and what is "hot". This is known as programming. Social programming. They dictate what you hear, when you hear it, and how you should feel about it. They want to control you. And the money they get from the advertisers supports them. Welcome to the age of information control. Welcome to a corporation telling you what, when, how, where, and who you should be. Yes, Clear Channel is affiliated with the RIAA. Clear Channel is the number 1 distribution and marketting tool of the recording industry. More than MTV. More than your record store. The control the airwaves, they control the content. You just sit there and soak up the waves. The only freaking radio station that has national and local coverage that I've heard in a long time is NPR. Yeah, it's not the latest Britney pop crud, it's historical pop. But it's also national and a little local news. EFF, FSF, OSS, and anyone with a brain should support this existing institution. Cause guess what? If Clear Channel could, they'd buy up those frequencies and broadcast more consumerism and mind control. Guess what would happen to the national social structure if Clear Channel stopped broadcasting for a week? Maybe people would wake up and start going into withdrawl. That would be fun. Can't get your fix of stupid mind numb and you realize just how much a a messed up society America has allowed itself to become. Control by corporations. The board of director decides that you need to see more jiggling boobies to pacify you. You need to hear another bad commodity "punk/hardrock" band who is angry, rebels without a clue.
    And it's not just radio. Television has been this way from the beginning. Look at cable. 99 channels of centralized propaganda (CNN/FOXNews/MSNBC/etc.). And don't think they won't fight to keep it that way. And they have the money. They have the control. They have the "law" on thier side. As long as they keep the money rolling in, the get to keep the castle.
    I say all this and know I will be scoffed at as a lunatic. I will be speken about with unkind words and referred to as a little too paranoid for a rational reader to agree with. But 20 minutes into the future has already happened. We are living in the age of information control. And besides, Max Headroom was just a bot with a tweaked logic algorythm modelled after a paranoid, hyper, driven man who hit his head because he tried to speak about "truth". Truth only exist. No one ever sees it for what it is. And we are all lying. Every one of us.
    Screw it, I always wanted to be a console jockey. I even know a few bars that will serve nicely as good hang-outs in the Sprawn when it finally gets it's name.
    Jack in, have fun, but watch out for that black ice. It killer.

    --
    Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
    1. Re:Fear and Loathing in my head... by Aine · · Score: 1

      Not gonna trash you or say that you're a lunatic because I happen to agree with you.

      Now, if only the rest of the people in this country would wake up from their media-induced coma, maybe something would change for the better?

      --
      So far left, I'm right.
  106. I'll give you "fear factor". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But soon you won't be able to find a real live TV host on either coast of the US.

    Which is just the way it ought to be.

  107. Those of you who trash CC miss the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First of all, I agree. Clear Channel sucks.

    However, the real problem isn't them. The real problem is the artificial scarcity in radio frequencies.

    The FM radio band takes up about a third of the airspace that the AM radio band takes up. Yet they can pack more stations into that band and it is better sounding. Why? You guessed it. Better technology.

    There exists technology to now pack many more stations into the same space that FM could only imagine. If the FCC would get off its ass and allocate a new radio band, we could have hundreds of new stations.

    The status quo only favors the incumbants.

  108. From Clear Channel itself: by dcuny · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I grabbed the following from the Clear Channel site. They appear to be quite proud of this technology. After all, it directly benefits us, the consumer!
    • Despite Clear Channel Radio's far reaching geography, radio remains a live and local medium in every market the company serves.

    Except, of course, when it's not actually live nor local.

    • Clear Channel Radio's size, however, allows it to leverage state-of-the-art technology and large-market on-air talent to deliver premium programming to smaller towns.

    "Leverage" is must be a euphanism for "use our market power to drive everyone else out of business".

    "Premium programming to smaller towns" is a nice phrase... You certainly don't want any local DJ on the airwaves. Thank goodness for Clear Channel!

    • Hugely popular shows can be broadcast all over the country, giving listeners the programming and diversity they crave no matter where they are.

    Ever wonder what "diversity" means? According to Clear Channel, it's "everyone listening to the same thing."

    There's a difference between "everyone is forced to listen to it" and "hugely popular". Pretty much everyone had to eat cafeteria food in my elementry school, but I don't recall it being "hugely popular."

    • Clear Channel uses digital voice tracking and in-market feeds to deliver a sound that is live and local.

    Except, of course, that it's neither live nor local. Oops, I'm repeating myself.

    The biggest scam is that the audience is largely unaware that it's canned, which means that your profit stream is based on the idea of deceiving to your customers. Any what justifies this?

    Oh, yes... Premium profits.

    • Technology enhancements across the board are changing the way Clear Channel logs inventory, sells airtime, programs radio stations, bills advertisers and runs promotions. Result: Greater value for both advertisers and listeners.

    Thanks again, Clear Channel! Those tunes sound so much better, now that you more efficiently sell huge blocks of advertising time through national markets.

    It's pledge drive at my local NPR station. I'm suddenly feeling much, much more guilty for not contributing.

  109. Max Hedroom: Kinda Off Topic by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    This gets me thinking: There's an awful lot of borderline sci-fi from the 80's depicting technology from the near future in interesting ways. A good chunk of this fantastical tech is perfectly possible now. Just how far off are we from being able to simulate Max Hedroom?

    Do a 3D-face scan, distort to give it a plastic appearance, lip sync to a rudimentary bank of soundbytes (which could be customized from user to user), studder in the proper places-ces-ces. Proper places. The current range of 3D cards could -easily- render something even more believable than Max. Sure, it wouldn't be intelligent, but then, how many intelligent people do you know? You know?

    That seems like a reasonably profitable desktop toy to me.

    And by the way, why hasn't anyone made a version of Space Paranoids?

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Max Hedroom: Kinda Off Topic by topham · · Score: 1

      So, do you really think CNN puts people in front of the camera?

      Come on!

  110. Re:My stupidity is reaching new heights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your stupidity is reaching new heights, of that there is no doubt.

  111. Awesome technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do the same thing on his NBC Talk Show. They just digitally place him in the picture and have him make bland somewhat out-of-place comments in response to the live guest.

    Even I was fooled. I just thought he was incredibly awkward and boring, but after reading this article it's all clear to me.

  112. Re:If you are not old enough (or American enough). by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    no shit? i had no idea.

  113. Pictures of Britney Spears !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  114. this is wrong by spoot · · Score: 1

    Off the top of my head there are probably 3 or 4 partially unionized markets in the US. The VAST majority of the radio personalities are not in a union, I'll bet 99.9 percent. The last thing CC or Infinity wants is union. In fact, the vast majority of the jocks doing this are in non-union markets. Get lower paying jocks to fill many jobs. In fact, CC uses smaller market jocks to voice track larger markets. The larger market jocks used to be paid more.

    Also the Dick Clark and Casey Casem analogy isn't right. These folks did weekend and day-parted syndicated shows that we're never intended to infer that they were local. Voice tracking is filling dayparts in all but the drive times and drive times are in many markets syndicated with national personalities.

    The real problem here is that radio is eating its young. With the day-parts being eaten by voice tracking, there is no farm market for new personalities to learn their craft. CC is screwing themselves in the long run.

    Don't get me started with this crap. 100,000 thousand radio jobs have been lost in the last 10 years. Thankfully I'm not one of them. I became a dreaded media consultant.

  115. STFU michael y00 h0m0 p373r PuFFeR!11!! by Meowharishi · · Score: 0

    **faggit**

    yes you michael fuck off you homosexualbuttraper

    --
    mje0w!!!1!
  116. Obligatory simpson's quote: by kwashiorkor · · Score: 1

    Hey, hey. How about that weather out there?

    Whoah! That was the caller from hell.

    Well, hot dog! We have a weiner.

    Those clowns in congress did it again. What a bunch of clowns.
    </dj3000>

    --
    -- kwashiorkor --
    Leaps in Logic
    should not be confused with
    Jumping to Conclusions.
  117. I'm not NY Times disabled... by ryman · · Score: 1

    ...I'm NY Times *challenged*
    .
    .
    .
    wait...
    .
    .
    here it comes...
    .
    .
    .
    you insensitive clod!

    --
    "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
  118. Just more of the same old Slashdot hyprocracy by wadetemp · · Score: 1

    So constructing a radio program using fragments of human speech is bad. What is the difference between doing this and using software to build an artificial human army (pieced together with samples of human movements and behaviors) for a movie? When Weta does it, piecing together "entertainment" using technology is unanimously good. When ClearChannel does it, piecing together "entertainment" using technology is unanimously bad. Someone care to explain?

  119. Worst case of CC infestation is here in San Diego by ewolfr · · Score: 0

    We have the honor(?) of having the largest concentration of CC owned and operated stations in the country. They own the maximum 8 that they are allowed and control the programming and ad sales for 6 more based out of Mexico. I still can't believe I have to explain to people why I signed up with XM Radio and that they should as well.

  120. some links for consideration... by VoidEngineer · · Score: 1

    I don't know the answers to all of your questions, but I can provide some information for two of them....

    How long untill we're not ALLOWED to turn off our TVs?

    Maybe sooner than you think... Autostereoscopic Displays being worked on at MIT's Spatial Imaging Group run on SGI O2s. In answer to your question, we won't be allowed to turn off out televisions when our televisions get user level (and group level?) security installed... This will probably coincide with televisions getting file-level security. I can only imagine having to fill out forms and register with an application/internet service provider in order to upgrade from being a 'user' to being a 'poweruser'... "Damn. I had to pay $49.95 and go take a user-training course to be allowed to turn off my television..."

    How long before our TVs watch what WE'RE doing so advertisers can see what effect they're having?

    You will note that the design setup for the Mark II Autostereoscopic Display utilizes a video camera to watch the viewers and generate virtual 3D goggles. It's already built into the system design of next-generation 3D televisions...

  121. Re:Wha? by GNUman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's where Everything2 comes into play, do a search for "In Soviet Russia" you get:

    In Soviet Russia
    (idea) by Andux (3.6 min) (print) ? 1 C! Sun Dec 08 2002 at 7:08:19

    A joke originated by Russian comedian Yakov Smirnoff,* which, years later, turned into a meme on Something Awful (thanks, anotherone), and then spread to Fark, where it eventually attained a level of popularity great enough to necessitate filtering. In November of 2002, it was introduced to Slashdot, and by the end of the month had attained a level of popularity rivaling that of CowboyNeal.

    Although the joke is often mangled by those looking for cheap laughs and easy karma (as was AYBABTU before it), it's quite possible to create a Soviet Russia for almost any occasion with just a few simple steps:

    1. Take a sentence,
    The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
    2. switch around the subject and the object (for second person imperative sentences (e.g., "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those."), you will, of course, have to add the subject first),
    The lazy dog jumps over the quick brown fox.
    3. ensure that the verb(s) are in the proper tense,
    The lazy dog jumps over the quick brown fox.
    4. (optional) remove words and/or change spellink to create effect of Russian accent (or simply trim the superfluous crap),
    lazy dog jumps over quick brown fox.
    5. prepend "In Soviet Russia," and change punctuation and emphasis to taste.
    In Soviet Russia, lazy dog jumps over quick brown fox!
    6. Share and Enjoy!

    Disclaimer: I am not responsible for any losses of karma, tarnished reputations, lynchings, atrocities, or global thermonuclear wars that occur as a result of the use, misuse, or disuse of this writeup.
    In Soviet Russia, memes node YOU!

    *There's some debate as to what the original "Soviet Russia" joke was. Augusta says it was "In Los Angeles, you can always find a party. In Soviet Russia, the Party can always find YOU," while BrooksMarlin remembers it being "...television watches YOU!" Google and Yakov.com both seem to be silent on the subject.

  122. Re: what else clear channel has on it's site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TOKEN BLACK GUY JOINS BOARD:
    Yet remians suprisingly silent, stating only.
    "I'm just glad to be here! Gosh free cubans and m&m thats actually melt in your mouth, not in your hand! whoopie!"

    Former Congressman J.C. Watts joins Clear Channel Board

    I guess that makes up for the nepotism of hiring your sons as Chief Officers and leaving out the pictures of your CIO and CTO like they were nobodies compared to the other CHIEF OFFICERS
    http://www.clearchannel.com/ci_oe.php

  123. Mark E. Salomone & Morelli by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    I can't help but be reminded of the Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone & Morelli, who run canned ads during daytime talk shows like Ricki Lake. I saw the exact same ads for a different law firm in NYC; it seems that they are using canned ads, with a convenient cut away from the face of the person saying the law firm's name as he announces it to the stunned evil insurance company guy, so the different firm names can be edited in. I guess they're doing this nationwide.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  124. Well, Sega tried. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Remember Space Channel 5? That game was vaguely the plot of Max Headroom retrofitted onto a 60's-kitsch sci fi dance theme. Sega also heavily promoted Ulala, the game's all-singing, all-dancing, all-CG main character, and had her appear on the MTV music awards.

    The game is adorable, clever, and quite fun. Unfortunately its "simon says" gameplay is a little too simplistic for today's Resident Evil and GTA loving crowd, so it did not sell well, and Sega's big Ulala marketing blitz flopped. I bet there are toy stores in my area still trying to dump their excess Space Channel 5 inventory...

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  125. You hit the point by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    Right on head, as a matter of fact.

    It is appropriate that Daly's broadcasting presence is being termed a "simulacrum" becuase that is exactly the term P. K. Dick uses to describe the androids built to help colonize the moon in We Can Build You. The simulacra are originally built as a potential source of profit and though they are never produced in mass, the idea is that they would make perfect laborers (nannies). This idea is present also in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (which gets represented in the form of replicants in the Hollywood translation, Bladerunner)

    But this is all a long way of saying that simulacra will displace humans from their jobs. I'm not saying this is a bad thing (though it is in some respects). Just saying that labor issues are a main source of the controversy, in addition to the manufacturing of corporate-sponsored national taste disguised as authentic local style.

    (Regarding regional inhabitants, New Yorkers are New Yorkers while people living in L. A. are Los Angelenos.)

    --
    blog
  126. I wonder how soon by wiredog · · Score: 1
    The NY TImes is going to start complaining about this sort of thing. Ripping the Times story without crediting the author, and barely crediting the Times.

    If you want to get slashdot sued for copyright violation, you're going about it the right way. Fair Use does not mean you can rip the entire thing.

    1. Re:I wonder how soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      actually this is legal.

      my question is, does slashdot conspire to publish new york times only articles?

  127. Casey Casem show by Degrees · · Score: 1

    A long time ago, the local radio station was holding a contest, where you could win the Top 40. My little brother won one week. We got a box with four LP's, a half-hour per side, with the pre-recorded Casey Casem's America's Top 40 radio show on it. Old people like myself remember the turntables where you could stack a few LP's on top, and at the end of one, the arm would move out of the way, the next record drops, and the arm starts on the next record. The LP's were mastered in such a way to play the show this way, in order. There were comercials in there and everything. When the show played, the only place for local content was the station identifier break every half hour.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  128. Ha ha ha. by twitter · · Score: 1
    How long untill we're not ALLOWED to turn off our TVs?

    Have you ever seen the no remote controle icon on your DVD? It comes up when you try to press the menu button to get away from the FBI warning and studio adverts. It's not nearly effective, howerver, as having a wife. Just try to tell her you don't want a TV on all day!

    How long before our TVs watch what WE'RE doing so advertisers can see what effect they're having?

    The TV does not need to know. Your Tivo or cable box knows what you watch and your credit card knows what you buy. Put the two togeter. The next generation of digital TVs will complete the loop for all TVs.

    How long before Max is invading MY TV screen?

    As others have pointed out, you won't get anything as fun as Max.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  129. and away you go! by twitter · · Score: 1
    If a generic local DJ can be replaced with such a simple tool then we are not loosing much. If the most brain-dead table look-up can pass the Turing test then perhaps local DJs need to do their homework, learn more about their community and really have somthing to offer.
    Try this:

    If your mother's home cooking can be replaced with such a simple stuff then we are not losing much. If the most brain-dead table fare can pass the nutrition test then perhaps your mother need to do her homework, learn more about her community and really have somthing to offer.

    Rather than describe this as wiz-bang tech, I'd describe it as poor cooking by local moms. Don't get me wrong, I do want good local cooking. I do not want junk generic food spewed by a "local mom" (read moved in from out of state last week).

    Oh dear, I'm afraid it's frozen fish sticks for you in the Clear Channel Commune. They passed the nutition test and it's so much cheaper to raise children that way.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  130. Tom Petty's new song.. "The Last DJ" sums this up by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    Listen to the tune by Tom Petty, "The Last DJ"

  131. Re:May Clearchannel die so *real* radio might live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, those services are provided by the fine folks at Cirius cybernetics Corporation.