Slashdot Mirror


Ogg Vorbis Portables On The Way

Emmettfish writes "According to this release on Xiph.org, it looks like the Neuros player will support Linux users, and also give them the ability to play back Vorbis files on the move, starting in late May. Go Ogg! Remember, donating a few bucks to Xiph may not make the world a better place, but it'll definitely help it sound a lot better." For those of us craving a portable that plays from cheap CD-Rs rather than flash media or a hard drive, Emmett says by email that an agreement for development of firmware for a CD-based Ogg player is in the works, too.

356 comments

  1. It's about time by KiahZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm glad this is finally happening... too bad it doesn't say how much this thing costs. Speaking as a broke college student, I can't afford to pay a ridiculous premium for a small gain in audio quality.

    --
    I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    1. Re:It's about time by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Informative

      $250 for the 128 meg, $400 for the 20GB.

      In other words, more than my main desktop computer cost.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:It's about time by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find the fact that Ogg Vorbis is an open format more important than the small gain in audio quality.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, now we are looking for more employees.
      The current technological scenarios always keeps us on toes.
      President
      RIAA

    4. Re:It's about time by radja · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually.. on the site, I found the price of $249 for the 128MB, $399 for the 20GB HD one.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    5. Re:It's about time by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      And I find the fact that the site demo is flash based, very repulsive.
      I can't spend two seconds on a site which is purely flash based.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    6. Re:It's about time by Dukebytes · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No kidding. This is great and all - but good lord. All the MP3 players are big $$$$ IMHO.

      They have about $12 worth of parts in them if that much and they are all over $150.00... I want one to work out with at the gym - but I'm not paying that much for one when I can have a CD walkman for $20 bucks....

      --

      FreeBSD: Nothing runs like a daemon with a pitch fork.
    7. Re:It's about time by arkanes · · Score: 1, Informative

      I got the 128MB Nomad MuVo(stupid name, I know) for 131 from newegg, including shipping. Still a bit pricey, I know, but considering the advantages over a CD player (no skipping, much smaller, 12 hour battery life) I think it's worth it.

    8. Re:It's about time by EpsCylonB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It should be pointed out that the notion that Ogg Vorbis is provides better quality audio is not universally accepted. Audio quality is incredibly difficult to quantify as it is subjective. Even if you ignore all the different variables (CBR vs VBR, quality of audio equipment, etc.) one person may make very different judgements from another (especially with Vorbis and Mp3 being so close).

      And most tech reviews I have read seem to indicate that the different compression formats (Vorbis, Mp3 and WMA) all have different strengths when it comes to particular types of music.

    9. Re:It's about time by B1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ack---accidentally moderated this as Flamebait, thanks to an over-zealous mouse wheel. I hereby post in order to nullify my errant moderation in this thread.

    10. Re:It's about time by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      It's also not universally accepted that the earth is round, but only bozos think otherwise. Vorbis' quality gain is obvious, esp. at low bitrates.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    11. Re:It's about time by damiam · · Score: 1

      You try buying a 20GB 1.5-inch hard drive for $12.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    12. Re:It's about time by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      Still, some listening tests have shown that most people prefer ogg.

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    13. Re:It's about time by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just about.

      Assuming you can borrow a CDROM for the initial OS install and already have a mouse, keyboard, and monitor you get...

      Micro ATX Case = $52
      Nforce Motherboard = $78
      Athalon XP1600 = $58
      256MB PC2100 RAM = $41
      20 GB Hardrive = $69

      Subtotal = $298

      If you insist on building a complete system you need to add...

      Keyboard and Mouse = $20
      52x CDRom = $28
      15" Monitor = $99

      Subtotal = $147

      For a grand Total of $445

      You can put together a cheaper system. You could save $25 dollars by going with an 1100Mhz Duron processor and save $20 more by shaving the RAM down to $128. That would bring you down to $400. It just seems like that extra $45 buys a hell of a lot extra power. (check out Toms CPS Performance Check)

      Prices courtesy of Five O'clock Computers

      For what it's worth, the above desktop system BLOWS AWAY my current desktop system (a PIII 700). So I know its possible to do some serious work on it.

    14. Re:It's about time by ThundaGaiden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been waiting years for a cd player that can
      play mp3's , because all the ones I've seen are
      small home company's which never ever get outside
      of the country they were created in. I like the
      idea's behind ogg , but haven't switched to it yet

      If a big name company releases a ogg cd player
      (rw) mind you and it reaches the backwaters where
      I live , I'll jump on the bandwagon 100% and go
      ogg

      I can't wait for ogm to come to light in the near
      future either

    15. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      $400 desktop computer?!? Sounds pretty crappy.

      Dude... did you buy a Dell?

    16. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF audio is encoded at @128kb/s. However almost all people don't notice any difference between original CD and MP3@256kb/s or MP3@high-quality VBR.

      Thus Ogg doesn't have a "better audio", CD-quality Ogg just takes less space than CD-quality MP3. However with 20GB capacity in players, bitrate is quite irrelevant.

    17. Re:It's about time by orbital3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a long time follower of the different audio encoding technologies, I have to agree with you on your point that the quality of the different formats seems to be quite subjective, but personally, I'm one of the many (few?) whose ears are overwhelmingly in favor of Ogg.

      I can't STAND WMA at all... it has a high end ringing screech at pretty much any bitrate, while at the same time, some people swear by WMA. WMA also boosts the volume of the encoded material to give the listener the impression that it's better quality, which is bad form, IMO.

      MP3 is pretty impressive nowadays, with all of the work that has gone into LAME... Even 128kbit VBR is passable. But as I said, to my ears at least, they all bow before Ogg. That same passable quality you get at 128kbit with LAME you get at 96kbit with Ogg. And the artifacts are also much less offensive to my ears, but again, that is a matter of opinion.

      Anyway, I hear too much completely uninformed Ogg bashing, and I wish everyone would do some objective testing of their own. Go read up on blind ABX testing, and do some yourself. If Ogg isn't the one you think sounds best, that's fine, but just don't say it's crap without giving it a shot!

    18. Re:It's about time by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      especially with Vorbis and Mp3 being so close
      Vorbis and MP3 are not close. Even at high bitrates MP3 sucks, at 256Kb/s with the latest build of LAME I hear irritating artefacts (yes, I've done a blind comparison with the original CD, ripped to wav. I could hear the difference every time.). Vorbis and AAC (with the psytel encoder - the Dolby consumer one just isn't up to scratch) are close. For some things AAC is better, for some Vorbis is. I've just switched from AAC to Vorbis because the standard is open, and so I know I'm not going to be hounded for patent royalties at a later date.
      I often listen to a 42kbps ogg stream. Sure, I can hear artefacts in it, but it's fine for background music while I work. I couldn't say the same about MP3 at anything lower than 128Kbps, and even then I'd be dubious.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:It's about time by jridley · · Score: 1

      A friend did some fairly extensive tests using nice headphones (Sennheiser). His results were that for the same amount of space that a 320 kbps MP3 takes, he could make an OGG file that he couldn't tell from the original CD in blind listening tests. A 320 kbps MP3 is EASILY differentiated from the original. At lower levels (192/256) MP3s are good for cars or jogging/exercising where noise levels are high anyway.

      I'm happy the Neuros is getting this feature; I've been excited about the player, and this is one more reason to be happy about it!

    20. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sony cd player gets about 80 hours of battery life. I used to have a 64 mb mp3 player, but the battery life in the thing was so low I sold it off to get the cd player.

    21. Re:It's about time by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      This is offtopic- but I agree it is such a pity that interactive apps like this are more common in flash than java, but bear in mind that Java is still not free as in beer. Yes the source is there, and the language is free - but only as long as Sun allow it to be. Have you ever read the sun licence agreement?

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    22. Re:It's about time by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      oops- I meant java is free as in beer but not entirely free as in speech. Hence why I should have previewed.... Fool.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    23. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's all in the wrist. Upgrade your office laptop, poof, harddrive for less than $12.

    24. Re:It's about time by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "In other words, more than my main desktop computer cost."

      pFff. Like your eMachines can even play music. Heh.

    25. Re:It's about time by Emmettfish · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Thus Ogg doesn't have a "better audio", CD-quality Ogg just takes less space than CD-quality MP3. However with 20GB capacity in players, bitrate is quite irrelevant.

      There is no such thing as 'CD-quality' when dealing with a lossy encoder like mp3 or Ogg Vorbis. True CD quality can only be attained with a lossless encoder, like FLAC or Shorten.

      If you think Ogg Vorbis sounds better than mp3 at comparable bitrate or lower, then it's safe to say that you consider Ogg Vorbis representative of "better audio," or better reproduction of sound. If you do find this to be true, then you're in good company; Large amounts of double-blind testing agrees with you.

      Bitrate is never irrelevant. Bitrate multiplied by time equals size, and anyone who has ever filled a hard drive could probably tell you about how some things can look very large indeed from far away, but hit their limit of usefulness in a curiously small amount of time.

      Emmett Plant
      CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

    26. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some might think thier posts to be insightful, but are in fact blowhard assclowns.

    27. Re:It's about time by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      ECS K7S5A is a very good low cost motherboard. Huge installed base of Linux users on it. Even has its own HOWTO for Linux on it.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    28. Re:It's about time by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it takes much to switch to ogg. At least make a point to encode all the CDs you rip to ogg, if you download anything try to look for ogg, otherwise download mp3. They've got a nice free ogg encoder. To get anything that nice for MP3 is typically shareware, so the ogg encoder alone is enough to make it worth the switch. Whatever you do don't reencode your mp3s to ogg. Unless you are going to rerip them as well. That's too much effort for me though.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    29. Re:It's about time by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      No one's mentioned Java. Just because Java is evil doesn't mean that Flash can't be also evil.

    30. Re:It's about time by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "WMA also boosts the volume of the encoded material to give the listener the impression that it's better quality, which is bad form, IMO."

      Do you have a source for this? A while back, someone was spreading FUD about how WMA added 3 dB to make things sound louder and fake higher quality. (I actually helped spread this before I came to my senses.) As far as I know, the part about WMA boosting the amplitude is fiction. And just for the record, I also swear by OGG, and I can tell the difference between quality level 8.5 and 9.0.

    31. Re:It's about time by evilviper · · Score: 1
      True CD quality can only be attained with a lossless encoder, like FLAC or Shorten

      I hate hearing this, and I hear it so very much... The reason I hate hearing it, is because CD is treated as a be-all end-all quality standard. As if CD quality is perfect, and attempting to mimic CD quality sound is like attempting to acheive perfection. I would like to see hear about Ogg surpassing CD quality, but that can't be done if everyone is using CDs as the master.

      Every audio format is lossy. CDs are not the exact copies of the live audio. Even SACD and DVD-Audio can't perfectly reproduce sound. Everything is a lossy copy of it's high quality source.

      My contention is this... Any lossless encoding technique, taken to a high enough rate, could just as well outdo what we consider to be lossless. I, for one, would love to hear both an Ogg file and a PCM file which come from an incredibly high quality master. Just as Ogg files encoded from MP3s cannot ever hope to outdo the original lossly MP3 source, Ogg files encoded from CD can never outdo CDs. In fact, they can never even hope to truely match CD quality.

      To even possibly do that, an Ogg file would have to be encoded from the same higher quality master source as the CD was. That would be the only way to give Ogg (or any other lossy codec) a fair chance. Downsampling to CD quality PCM may well throw away different data than oggenc would, if it was encoded from the same source as the CD. Just perhaps, an Ogg file at 32kbps might sound better than a CD if it had the opportunity of being encoded from a higher-quality source. But since all audio testing I've ever heard about uses a CD as the audio source, there would just be no way to know.

      It would be interesting to note at what quality Ogg could surpass CD quality, or DVD-Audio/SACD quality. Ogg as a format that is only trying to mimic CD sound quality, is like trying to make a format that will mimic MP3 sound quality. There is just no way to do as well as the original, unless you encode the same way as the original, throwing away all of the same data.

      I look forward to hearing any comments. I would especially like to hear (as I metioned above) at what quality Ogg sounds better than CDs (and in what ways) if encoded from a higher quality source, if anyone has done any such tests.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:It's about time by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Thats kinda what I was saying. I didnt in any way imply flash is not evil. So, forgiving my ignorance, do we have a non-evil OSS interactive web thing?

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    33. Re:It's about time by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      CD quality does not mean it has to be from a CD!

    34. Re:It's about time by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      HTML. :)

      There are a few solutions available, like using free implementations of Flash (not quite done yet) and Java, or wait for a (or work on the) good SVG-implementation in Mozilla.

    35. Re:It's about time by jn42 · · Score: 1
      No, "CD Quality" is largely a marketing term that translates as "Gee it sounds really good" and little more.

      Why don't you go record a "CD Quality" mp3 or ogg file from an FM broadcast, and let me know if it sounds like a CD, or like an FM broadcast... I'll wait... :^)

      I, too, have been bothered by the tendency among listeners as well as hardware/software designers to present "CD Quality" as though it were the Holy Grail of desktop audio. I am right now trying to locate some really clean 96khz or 192khz 24-bit PCM audio sources for use in subjective testing of different formats - CD-equivalent PCM (44khz 16bit) vs MP3 vs Vorbis vs FLAC.

      FLAC, btw, supports up to 32bit samples (up to 24 for most software) and up to ~1GHz sampling rate, so using it to store music 'ripped' from a CD or sampled from a DAT soundboard recording is hardly a test of what the format can achieve...

      j

    36. Re:It's about time by Abreu · · Score: 1

      The Napa DAV311 can be purchased in any computer bazaar in Mexico for about 80USD...

      It plays CD's, MP3 CD's, and even has a video output if you want to play VCD's on it.

      Behold! The power of Chinese sweatshop manufacturing!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    37. Re:It's about time by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Better link for the Napa DAV311
      soooorry!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  2. MP3 players by mschoolbus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well this is obviously good for ogg, but even if this does gain some momentum a big name portable mp3 player manufacturer will simply put it in their player and way underprice these guys.

    I am not saying it isn't a good idea at all, but don't you think they could get shut out of business really quick?

    1. Re:MP3 players by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your point is sound, but that's the way our society/industry works. People who make the money aren't the ones who pioneer new technologies - it's the people who innovate the new inventions, and make them better (e.g. putting new ogg (de|en)coding format in an existing player).

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    2. Re:MP3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hash Bang Slash User Slash Bin Slash Perl

      /usr does not mean "User". It stands for "Unix System Resource".

    3. Re:MP3 players by PhilHibbs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good! I don't really care about any individual manufacturer, what I want is a portable Ogg player. If someone else brings out a cheaper or better one, that's fine by me. These guys will get a good few sales by ebing first to market, but after that it's ogg eat ogg (sorry).

    4. Re:MP3 players by matithyahu · · Score: 0

      Lay off the crack okay? It's an open format

    5. Re:MP3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poop on a stick.

    6. Re:MP3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig is fucking stupid.

    7. Re:MP3 players by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      How I wish we could moderate -1 pedantic.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    8. Re:MP3 players by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      That would be illegal. Of course it takes a team of lawyers to get justice..

    9. Re:MP3 players by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      I know people who have spent a ton for the ipod (and they are windows not mac users) who will crap when they see that I get a device just as good as theirs + the transmitter..

      --
    10. Re:MP3 players by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      You are correct, but, if you look at the context of it's placement, it seems to indicate how it would sound in spoken word. The pronunciation. Maybe it's my regional dialect, but, all of the people I know who use #!'s, say 'user-bin-perl' or 'bin-bash' (N/A). Do you spell out 'u-s-r' when talking about #! lines in common conversation? I mean, if you do, that's fine. It's just new to me. *shrug*

      On another point, it's my damned sig. :-p

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  3. Implications: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would we have to call it joggvorbising then?

  4. nice by robofunk · · Score: 1

    and it's secsi too. i wonder if it will give the ipod a run for its money...

    1. Re:nice by p8 · · Score: 1

      It seems that Ogg Vorbis is already on the minds of the Apples. I can already be integrated with iTunes. They will probably try to incorporate it in their new iPods.. This will probably only happen, when more people will (be forced to) use Ogg Vorbis in stead of MP3.

    2. Re:nice by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      $20 says Ogg support comes with iTunse 4, due in July.
      I wouldn't be surprised if the iPod's coming out then have Ogg support too.

      At anyrate .. Ogg's not a concern of mine. AAC is the sound-shizzle.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  5. About time by Compact+Dick · · Score: 5, Insightful


    make sure the players support upgradeable firmware for future codec upgrades and I'm set - tho the specification does claim that all future Ogg Vorbis files will be decodable by the current decoder, it may miss out on improvements and enhancements.

    The CD-based player is a good idea for those of us with massive disc collections but just cannot be bothered to transfer the songs - much easier with a change of disc.

    Speaking of which - one of Ogg Vorbis' strongest selling points is bitrate peeling - you can "peel" a 192 kbps file to 128 kbps and the resulting file will sound just as good as if it were encoded directly off the original CD/wave file.

    But there is no tool yet. When can we expect to see one?

    Thanks for all the great work.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      Speaking of which - one of Ogg Vorbis' strongest selling points is bitrate peeling - you can "peel" a 192 kbps file to 128 kbps and the resulting file will sound just as good as if it were encoded directly off the original CD/wave file.

      But there is no tool yet. When can we expect to see one?


      So how exactly is this a strong selling point given that there are no tools to produce peelable streams and most clients can't play peelable streams?

    2. Re:About time by Skuto · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Speaking of which - one of Ogg Vorbis' strongest
      >selling points is bitrate peeling - you
      >can "peel" a 192 kbps file to 128 kbps and the
      >resulting file will sound just as good as if it
      >were encoded directly off the original CD/wave
      >file.

      Almost. Peeling will not give *exactly* the same quality, but much better than decode/reencode, and it will be faster too.

      >But there is no tool yet. When can we expect to
      >see one?

      There is a proof-of-concept tool available right now, but it does not get good quality yet. There hasn't been much demand for it yet so developers have focussed elsewhere - maybe with the portables out this will change.

      --
      GCP

    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      [quote]
      make sure the players support upgradeable firmware for future codec upgrades and I'm set
      [/quote]

      from their specs : ( http://www.neurosaudio.com/store/prod_20gbspec.asp )

      "Upgradeable firmware enables support for future audio formats"

      There you have it.... just read the articles.

    4. Re:About time by reidbold · · Score: 1

      From what I know, the ogg decoder has been finalized. The encoder has yet to catch to all the features, but the decoder should live on forever.

      --
      -Reid
    5. Re:About time by joe_bruin · · Score: 1

      make sure the players support upgradeable firmware for future codec upgrades

      you are definitely right about firmware upgrades. there is no reason a player that can read a filesystem should not be able to play any format that can be stored on it (obviously it must have enough horsepower to do so).
      a good example is that i have been able to upgrade the firmware on my car mp3 player (Kenwood Music Keg) to play Ogg (and FLAC). apparently it's made by this company and they keep updating the software (it runs linux, you can see the system files on the harddrive) to support more features. very cool to have paid for something and then gain additional functionality at no cost.

    6. Re:About time by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "There is a proof-of-concept tool available right now, but it does not get good quality yet. There hasn't been much demand for it yet so developers have focussed elsewhere - maybe with the portables out this will change."

      It would be cool if the software for the ogg vorbis portable player(s) would automatically peel files transferred to the player down to n kbps to save space, while the original high quality one stayed on main computer.

    7. Re:About time by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      It would be cool if the software for the ogg vorbis portable player(s) would automatically peel files transferred to the player down to n kbps to save space, while the original high quality one stayed on main computer.

      That sounds almost exactly like what QDX was designed to accomplish.

      I wonder which one maintains a higher quality stream after being pealed down...

  6. But... by CHUD-Wretch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it play Ogg? Oh! it does. I'm going back to sleep.

    --
    "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them."
    1. Re:But... by Gabrill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now if it only emulated the Atari 2600, we would have an entire Geek hobbyshop in one unit!

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  7. Nice, but I already have one... by tjansen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice, but I already have a portable Ogg Vorbis player: tkcPlayer

    1. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by mivok · · Score: 1

      Not to go taking money from theKompany, but xmms-embedded will also run on the zaurus, and play ogg files.

    2. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're not the only one. My WinCE-based (please stop throwing things at me) Cassiopeia E-100 can run PocketMVP which can play MP3/Ogg audio, and MPEG/DivX videos.

      The only problem is (as I see it) that a 32MB CF card (which should hold a full CD at almost CD quality "-q0") currently costs $15. On the other hand, Minidiscs are about $1 per disc, hold more than a CD, can record live audio (analog or digital--no computer required) in realtime, can edit the tracks on the fly, has better sound quality than Ogg at even the highest quality settings, has a longer battery life, puts off less heat, never skips, can be rewritten more times than a CF card, are more physically durable than a CF card, etc.

      Strangely enough, this same subject came up yesterday: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=54778&cid=5364 720

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by david.given · · Score: 1
      The only problem is (as I see it) that a 32MB CF card (which should hold a full CD at almost CD quality "-q0") currently costs $15. On the other hand, Minidiscs are about $1 per disc, hold more than a CD, can record live audio (analog or digital--no computer required) in realtime, can edit the tracks on the fly, has better sound quality than Ogg at even the highest quality settings, has a longer battery life, puts off less heat, never skips, can be rewritten more times than a CF card, are more physically durable than a CF card, etc.

      Actually, Minidiscs only store about 150MB. Standard MD ATRAC compression is around 300kb/s; MP3 and ogg can easily beat this --- just crank up the bit rate (although ATRAC does appear to be a technically superior compression algorithm).

      And they're certainly not robust. I mean, come on, moving parts. An equivalent CF-based player will be smaller and tougher and consume much less power (no disk to keep spinning).

      But that said, I really like Minidiscs. They're good enough for most purposes. They're cheap, as you say. I really like being able to losslessly edit on any device, even the smallest handheld player (even if the filesystem does suck and lose free space --- it can't coalesce disjoint blank areas shorter than about 12 seconds, it just loses them). I just wish that Sony had pushed data drives a bit harder; they'd make excellent floppy/ZIP disk replacements.

      Lots and lots of technical information can be found on this FAQ page. Interesting reading.

      BTW, how did you manage to fit a CD's worth of music onto a 32MB CF card? That must be some compression algorithm!

    4. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      BTW, how did you manage to fit a CD's worth of music onto a 32MB CF card? That must be some compression algorithm!

      64kbps and 48kbps ogg files are pretty good. Especially if you are blasting your headphones over a subway..

      Few headphones really have the quality where you notice artifacts. The ones that are of that high quality are pretty expensive.

      Anyway, at 64kbps, ogg files are 2 minutes per megabyte. So, 32 megs will give you an hour long CD.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    5. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      You know, I've often wondered why they haven't developed the ability to digitally transfer files from computer to minidisc, and minidisc to computer (i.e. putting mp3s on minidisc without having to press the record button). If they could do that, I would buy a minidisc player in a second. I love the players themselves, much more than HD based mp3 players, and I love the ability to pop out, popin minidiscs. If someone developed a minidisc player that was affordable that you could play mp3, or maybe even ogg, and connect to the computer....that would rock.

      Is the medium of the minidisc what keeps it from being able to store digital files? I don't know much about the structure of minidisc storage. Still, I think it would be a rad idea.

    6. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Actually, Minidiscs only store about 150MB.

      140MB to be exact.

      An equivalent CF-based player will be smaller and tougher and consume much less power (no disk to keep spinning).

      I would have to say ``NO" on all three counts. Minidisc players are just BARELY bigger than the discs. I've seen Minidiscs run over by a car, dropped off cliffs, gone through the washing machine, and more, only to continue playing as if it was brand new. As for battery life, I have never heard of any company beating sony in battery life, even in an unfair competition. The last time I cheked the specs on Sony's latest minidisc player, they were rated at 100hours on a single AA battery. My previous experience with Sony would lead me to believe that real world use will likely be even better. If you know of an MP3 player that can match that, I'm all ears.

      it can't coalesce disjoint blank areas shorter than about 12 seconds

      I have never had that experience. Many times I've moved, joined, and seperated portions of free space typically less than 2 seconds, with no problem. There are a few notes about that in their documentation, such as an extra track mark will be used, and any fragment smaller than 2 sec will still take up 2 sec of the disc. So, I'm not sure what experience you've had, but I certainly haven't had any problems.

      I just wish that Sony had pushed data drives a bit harder; they'd make excellent floppy/ZIP disk replacements.

      I agree, but they cleary were going for something to replace cassettes, DATs and CDs, and were not interested in the computer market at the time. In Japan, however, there are data Minidiscs in some Sony digital video cameras, and other small devices.

      how did you manage to fit a CD's worth of music onto a 32MB CF card? That must be some compression algorithm!

      Why, yes it is! I call it Ogg Vorbis, with a quality setting of "0" (ie. the "-q0" in my message). At that setting, it is very very rare that I hear even the slightest (subtle) artifact. That is despite the fact that much of the music I listen to has choked other codecs such as MP3, AAC, and VQF at higher bitrates. I would say 64kb OGG is approx. comparable to 256kb MP3.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by kotj.mf · · Score: 1
      You know, I've often wondered why they haven't developed the ability to digitally transfer files from computer to minidisc, and minidisc to computer...
      They do, though IIRC, you're limited to 1x. If you look at the release dates of some of those models, you'll note that MD-Data hasn't exactly been hot at Sony R&D for awhile.

      Now, if only I could get a NetMD player to work in Linux...

      --
      hang brain.
    8. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      You know, I've often wondered why they haven't developed the ability to digitally transfer files from computer to minidisc, and minidisc to computer

      So did "they" (Sony).

      If they could do that, I would buy a minidisc player in a second.

      Considering that the NetMD recorders have had that ability for years, I think you missed it by more than a second.

      A little extra info: "NetMD" recorders hook up to your computer via a USB connection. The software running on your computer converts your MP3s, OGGs, WMAs, WAVs (or whatever other format) to ATRAC3 (which is the MiniDisc's incridibly high quality format), and copies that to the minidisc at high speed. The speed depends on the quality.

      In standard mode, you can transfer 80 minutes at 4X (which means a CD quality 80 min MiniDisc in 20 minutes).

      You can check out mindisc.org, or sony.com for more info. Note the 100+ min playback time on a single AA battery!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now, if only I could get a NetMD player to work in Linux...

      I hope you meant to say "NetMD RECORDER".

      Anyhow, there is a GNOME project in the works. You can only rename tracks at the moment, but they are working on uploading/downloadintg of songs. I hope they have something working soon.

      http://www.gnome.org/softwaremap/projects/gnetmd /
      http://www.pdr.cx/projects/gnetmd/main/
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I meant a recorder. I've got an MZR500 that my girlfriend bought me (right before the NetMD stuff came out and the R-series got discounted, natch.) Since 90% of my music collection is on vinyl, anyway, I use it mostly as a really cool cassette deck.

      --
      hang brain.
    11. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      Oooooooh thanks for the info! As you can tell, I'm not very informed in this arena. ^^

    12. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Yeah, Minidisc is cheaper than solid state by the megabyte - but people don't buy a CF card for every album they own. Unlike a Minidisc, it's easy to interface solid state memory with a computer, so you can easily choose which music is on your cf card at any time.

      Minidiscs aren't HUGE, but let's face it, a Neuros can hold hundreds of Minidisc's worth of music, and you don't have to lug all that plastic around. Minidiscs are a good techonology for live recording, and that's about it - someday an iPod will come out with a phantom-powered microphone jack, and there will officially be no reason for MD to exist, except you still need a player to listen to your old MD's.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    13. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      " Nice, but I already have a portable Ogg Vorbis player: tkcPlayer [thekompany.com]"

      This is a little misleading. TkcPlayer is a software program. It runs on the Zaurus.

    14. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. I'm convinced that if Sony advertised the format a little better, MD would kill everything else that's out there. It's already been the end of cassette and DAT tapes, and I'm sure CDs would be next.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I know most people here think computers are the be-all-end-all, but most people don't want to have to fire up their system, select which music they want to take with them, etc.

      There are already MP3 recorders out there, but they have no chance of taking MD out of the picture. For one thing, even with OGG at high bitrates, sound quality still doesn't come close to MD. In addition, the price per time is so incredibly low for MD, I have a hard time believing digital players will ever be able to come close.

      I would believe that Palm PCs are going to replace notebooks and desktops, before I would even imagine that a digital music player could dream of even competing in the same field as MD. I believe that digital players happen to be like the WinCE devices of the music world... they're something that's bought because of the hype, and coolness factor rather than actual utility.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think MP3 players have already already surpassed MD in terms of price. An Archos Jukebox is 20 gigs for $200. 200 MD's is a pain to carry around and costs about $200. That doesn't include $100-$250 for the price of the MD recorder. Sure MD sounds better than 192Kbps, comparing high-quality lossey compressions is silly. Right now I think each has their advantages but overall they're about the same quality. However, getting into MD now forces you to put your music on a medium that can't be digitally transferred - and it's a given that MP3 players are getting better and better.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    17. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      200 MD's is a pain to carry around and costs about $200.

      Actually, MDs haven't been standing still since their inception. In LP2 mode, you can store more than twice as much music on each disc, and the quality should still be much better than 192Kbps MP3 files.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      200 MD's is a pain to carry around and costs about $200.

      Actually, MDs haven't been standing still since their inception. In LP2 mode, you can store more than twice as much music on each disc, and the quality should still be much better than 192Kbps MP3 files. At even lower quality, you can get ever longer play times on a single disc.

      So, that brings you down to 88 Minidiscs, and $88. In addition, you just need a portable player/recorder. sony.com has a "sport" model for $150 right now. I'm sure you could find other brands of MiniDiscs even cheaper.

      The MD still has many other advantages over the Archos. I would find it hard to believe that it can play for 50 hours on a single AA battery like the MD recorder can (and I've seen some MD players with 100+hours on a single AA).

      The Archos would not be enough for my entire music collection, and I would certainly not want to spend hours transfering the music I wanted to listen to onto it before every trip. With external media, I can just grab the box of 20 minidiscs that I feel like listening to on my way out. I can keep some of them in my car as well, and occasianlly let people borrow a MD I've recorded.

      getting into MD now forces you to put your music on a medium that can't be digitally transferred

      Since day #1, MiniDiscs could be digitally transfered. Today, there are multiple ways to digitally transfer audio.

      and it's a given that MP3 players are getting better and better.

      I don't want an MP3 player with permanent, built-in media, and CF cards are never going to be $1 a piece. So, no, I don't take it for granted that MP3/OGG players will ever be good enough to replace more conventional formats... That is, unless one can record to a miniCD-RW in realtime, skipping being a non-issue, being able to do advanced editing of the audio on-the-fly, and battery life is 100+hours on a single AA.

      All the formats that have hoped to replace the minidisc have come and gone... MP3 will too.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    19. Re:Nice, but I already have one... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      The MD still has many other advantages over the Archos. I would find it hard to believe that it can play for 50 hours on a single AA battery like the MD recorder can (and I've seen some MD players with 100+hours on a single AA).

      The battery statistics on MDs are NOT to be trusted. My Sharp 877 gets nowhere near the 12 hours the advertising claims...

      Well whatever. I'm speaking as somebody who wants a portable music device for recording concerts, and for easily carrying all (or at least a large portion of) my music collection around when I go on trips. To my mind, MD's are pretty good for the first task (wish I could automatically upload to computer and burn to CD, of course) but insufficient for the 2nd.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  8. Petition IRiver! by idealord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've got the IRiver MP3 CD player and it's nice but it would be way nicer with OGG support. They've got upgradeable firmware and they mention OGG support in their docs... but it never comes thru!

    --
    idealord music
    1. Re:Petition IRiver! by cetan · · Score: 1

      I've loved my iRiver since I've purchased it.

      I'm not huge into OGG files simply because of momentum (it would take me a really long time to re-rip all of my CDs and OGG them). But I would really like to see OGG support just for the fact that it would make a great product even better. I

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:Petition IRiver! by nnd · · Score: 1

      word is iriver will be releasing ogg firmware for the SlimX very soon. supposedly they allready have an ogg decoder running on the slimx, they just haven't made it available yet. im pretty excited ill finally be able to listen to all my oggs on the bus and at school.

  9. FM broadcasting feature. by borgdows · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the MyFi feature of Neuros is very fun, useful and innovative!

    MyFi allows you to broadcast the music on your Neuros through any FM radio. Like the one in your car. Or your kitchen. Or your coworker's boombox. MyFi automatically scans the FM radio dial for an available frequency and broadcasts using all digital stereo encoding, just like broadcast towers used by professional radio stations.

    I don't think RIAA will like this, but this feature is really a killer-app amha.

    1. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by questamor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd like the ability for it to play different songs on different FM frequencies, so maybe I could be in the office and say someone else could be too, and we could all be listening to different music all streamed from the one device. THAT would be killer!?!

    2. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by $0+31337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This kind of technology has been out for a long, long time. There are all kinds of devices that broadcast to a frequency on your radio... why would the RIAA care? The only people that are going to pick it up are the people 2 feet away from your current position.

    3. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nothing new, and it's not a killer feature - it's just so you don't have to hook up your player through a tape adaptor.

      There's one for the iPod - $30.

    4. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting
      the MyFi feature of Neuros is very fun, useful and innovative!

      Indeed. Does anyone know of one that can be picked up in the UK (preferably London) which has a range that covers the house?

      I'd love to tune the kitchen radio into my MP3's playing in my room without having to mess about with cables and moving equipment.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    5. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by trezor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow! A 2-feet piracy radius.

      [sarcasm]

      • According to Hillary Rosen
      • "This would provide a very safe perimiter for pirates worldwide. Having this safety as a bonus would surely lead to an increase in piracy like nothing we have yet seen."

      [/sarcasm]

      No seriously, really, if their lawyers found out a way to suit these guys for money, they would care.

      Law-suits probably has the record insdustries biggest income/outcome ratio as no real wokr is needed. Just free income(tm). It's their new business-model.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    6. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by qoncept · · Score: 1

      ..Huh? You can do it with a wireless FM modulator you can buy at Radioshack for $10 anyway (and people with a discman or mp3 player in their car do it quite a bit already). It IS awesome that it's built in, though.

      --
      Whale
    7. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's allowed in the US? Broadcasting in the FM range is strictly forbidden in Europe AFAIK.

    8. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by Chep · · Score: 1

      Nope, at least in my locale, it is tolerated to broadcast within a couple metres (basically, as long as it doesn't go beyond your walls). I'd love such a single-metre-range device for my car. In fact, I had built one out of a kit sold at Radio Shack, like, in 1988 ?

    9. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by sh00z · · Score: 1
      Does anyone know of one that can be picked up in the UK (preferably London) which has a range that covers the house?
      Start shopping with a Google for Part 15 FM transmitter.
    10. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by op51n · · Score: 1

      Much as I've been tempted to experiment with Ogg, I haven't got round to it because of my technology impeding me. Things like the DJ software I use, which doesn't support it, or my new car stereo which is mp3 cd player. If it weren't for these things not supporting it I'd try. As for this, with my car stereo playing mp3's I don't know how much I'm likely to ever need my discman or mp3 cd player again!

    11. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by bkhl · · Score: 1

      Have anyone got anything to say about the sound quality of this method. Why I am asking is that I am soon to move my computer out of my study and wonder how good this method would be for home stereo use?

      I would have the sender connected to my computer and pick up the signal in another room on a stereo with a reciever.

    12. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In "Europe"? Are you aware that you are talking about more than 50 countries as if they were one, even having the same laws? Get a fucking clue.

    13. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of tiny pirates.

    14. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by namespan · · Score: 1

      What if you combined that feature with a mesh-network style feature -- ie, any MiFi device will also (if you ask it to), scan for other MiFi broadcasts, pick them up, and rebroadcast.

      Competition/cooperation might be a problem, but you could essentially blanket a college campus. Legally.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    15. Re:FM broadcasting feature. by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Er, the same thing people have been doing with discman since they first came out...

      --
      Whale
  10. Low bitrates - vast improvement! by Frodo420024 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Recently, I've experimented with Ogg vs. MP3 for streaming voice (lectures, not music), and I find that at the low end of the bandwidth spectrum, Ogg is much better than MP3.

    An MP3 file at 32 kbit/second sounds muffled - high frequencies largely removed - while an Ogg at 23 kbit/second (16 kbit nominal) has a much better tonal balance. The Ogg stream is not pristine quality, but much better than the MP3.

    If you're interested in packing many hours of low bitrate material, Ogg is the way to go.

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
    1. Re:Low bitrates - vast improvement! by jmv · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, if you're interested in compressing voice, try Speex, another Xiph.org codec. At 16 kHz sampling rate, you can get almost transparent quality around 20-24 kbps and still decent quality in the 12 kbps range. (disclaimer: I'm the Speex author)

  11. Go with the 20GB hard drive. by hwsquaredcubed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have my doubts about this unit. In my opinion, the days of the flash-based MP3 (ogg, etc.) players are numbered for one simple reason: they don't hold enough music. Even if it's relatively simple to sync the device with the computer, it's still a pain to have to do that every time you want to listen to new music. I own the 15GB Archos Jukebox Recorder, which I got on sale for $150 (including rebate) a couple of months ago. I was able to put all of the songs I'd downloaded from my desktop and laptop - about 10GB worth of music - on it, and a bunch of my CDs as well. Now I don't have to take a bunch of CDs around with me, as the player can hook up to my home stereo, car stereo (it's a newer stereo that has an MP3 port and I use a cable to connect the player to the port - with the Neuros you could broadcast over the stereo's FM frequency), and also at work (I hook my computer's speakers up to the player). For me, it's a much better option than the flash-based players because I can fit so much more music on it. My only complaint is that there is so much music on it that it is sometimes hard to navigate around the HD to find exactly what you're looking for, especially if you don't take the time to really organize your music by folder, track number, etc., before you upload it to your player. I have heard that the user interface for the iPod solves some of these problems, so I am hoping that Archos comes out with a software fix soon. Anyway, the bottom line is that I would go with the 20GB option here - I guess my only concern about that in this instance is that the 20GB "backpack" looks huge, and might add a lot of weight to the unit and make it bulky. The Archos I have is a little heavier than I would prefer, but really not that bad. I am still able to jog with it, which is key. I carry it in my left arm now and for the first time in years, my left arm is the same size as my right arm. Just kidding.

    1. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by qoncept · · Score: 1

      I think you've got it backwards. In my mind, the hard drive based players' days are numbered. Flash memory capacities are raising almost as fast as the prices are dropping. It's difficult to predict the market in 3+ years, but I don't think it will be much longer than that when it will be both reasonable and affordable to fit your entire mp3 collection on flash memory. The fact that hard drives offer more storage for your money won't matter since flash will provide you with enough storage and in a much, much smaller form factor. Keep buying your hard drive players for now -- I definately agree that right now, they are a better deal (unfortunately no one offers one with enough storage for me..), so let the more casual users drive the price of flash based players down.

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by _aa_ · · Score: 1

      Check out Rockbox for an open source alternative firmware for the Archos Jukebox. One of the long-term goals of the project is the implementation of vorbis decoding (and other formats), which they claim may be possible provided they are given more information on the decoding chip.

    3. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by sickboy_macosX · · Score: 1

      Now if only Apple could get on the ball with the whole OGG file thing, it wouldnt be so bad, Open them firmware and make it!

      --
      --- /* In Soviet Russia, the Mac OS X kernel panics you! */
    4. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. "It's difficult to predict the market in 3+ years, but I don't think it will be much longer than that when it will be both reasonable and affordable to fit your entire mp3 collection on flash memory"

      2. "..hard drive players... they are a better deal (unfortunately no one offers one with enough storage for me.."

      Suppositions:

      - Your MP3 collection is therefore larger than 20 gigs, which is the maximum size of most portable MP3 players I know of.

      - You therefore think that flash memory will hold 20 gigs in 3 years, and that this will be "affordable" in 3 years.

      512 mb flash cards = $124 today.

      Given two revs of Moore's Law in 3 years, that still only brings us to a capacity of 2 gig. Ok, so, double the price and give you one additional 2x: $250 for 4 gig. That's still 5x smaller than your collection. It's also 100x smaller than my collection (400 gigs, but yes, I'm insane).

    5. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the Flash-based players ar far better. With them, I can have a huge archive of different albums on CF cards, and only take with me the ones I want. Sure, 10GB of music is nice, but CF cards are getting more and more capacity. What's even better is that you can loan the CF cards out like CDs if you'd like. Besides that, I don't like being stuck with a USB connection... I can transfer files much faster by sticking the CF card in my PCMCIA adapter and copying files.

      That said, minidiscs still seem to be a far better deal... I just wish Sony would do away with SCMS.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by qoncept · · Score: 1

      I think its a safe assumption that the manufacturers of mp3 players have decided that 20gb is about as big as the market would make profitable (otherwise, they'd all make 40gb players). The size of mp3s is staying the same, and new technologies will only make the filesizes smaller. Therefore, the size of the storage on mp3 players isn't going to increase, and at a certain point, flash is going to be more viable. Hard drives are too easily damaged when there is a comparably priced, solid state alternative, which isn't in the distant future.

      --
      Whale
    7. Re:Go with the 20GB hard drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, the days of the flash-based MP3 (ogg, etc.) players are numbered for one simple reason: they don't hold enough music.


      That's possibly because your opinion is obviously unable to see past the end of this year, let alone the decade.

      If you thought about it for merely a second you would realise that hard drive based players' days are numbered for the simple reasons; they're bulky, they consume too much power, they're prone to failure, they're heavy, etc.

      Once flash is cheaply available in a 20GB size, you can kiss HD players goodbye. You can already buy flash-based IDE drives in that size if you've got about $24K to burn.

      How long do you thing that this will take?
      Well, consider that the latest 3D Gfx cards today may have about 64 times more RAM than the average PC contained in 1991.
      New PCs system RAM now... what, 256MB? 512MB RAM? 1991; 1-4MB

      You can buy 512MB SD cards now (or very soon anyway), in 12 years time that could easily be 32GB.

      The day of the flash based MP3/OGG players is just dawning. What you see now are merely toys compared to what will follow.

  12. $250 for 128MB, $400 for 20GB by raygundan · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can confirm this cost by hitting the CompUSA preorder site (ship date of tomorrow, feb. 25th).

    http://www.compusa.com/promos/neuros/default.asp

    Fairly expensive. But I do like the built-in FM transmitter. Also, I would recommend buying the 128MB unit, as the 20GB HDD will be available as a "backpack" that makes the 128 exactly the same (size, shape, capacity) as the 20GB unit. However, the 20GB unit can't be "downgraded" to a smaller, more pocketable 128.

    1. Re:$250 for 128MB, $400 for 20GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A built in FM transmitter?! Man, setting up your own pirate radio station has never been so easy!

    2. Re:$250 for 128MB, $400 for 20GB by TheCrimsonUnbeliever · · Score: 1

      The kid is right - It works like one of those Microphones you got as a kid - SHORT range though - The site does not say how far but I am guessing within 20M~

      An EXCELLENT idea that is

    3. Re:$250 for 128MB, $400 for 20GB by sh00z · · Score: 1
      It works like one of those Microphones you got as a kid
      Somebody has to say it, so...

      "Hey good-lookin'! We'll be back to pick you up later!"

    4. Re:$250 for 128MB, $400 for 20GB by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      You're showing your age :) Those Mr. Microphone commercials were pretty cheesy!

  13. Looks like what I've been waiting for by teks0r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been researching various portable MP3 players for some time, meanwhile budgeting some cash that I could use to buy one. I had my mind set on a iPod for a while because the design looked sleek and elegant, stored gigs of music, and reportedly got good life out of its batteries.

    My alternative to an iPod would have been the player from Archos, which was AFAIK the second portable music player that stored giga-, not mega- bytes.

    Since the investment in one of these players is fairly substantial (300-400 USD), and as of late I have more and more music files in .ogg format, I decided to hold off until something actually played .ogg's.

    This is probably the music player that I've been waiting for. A hard drive so I can store thousands of songs (as opposed to whatever I can squeeze into 32 or 64 megs), and some 'smart' features such as recording and being able to broadcast to a radio.

    I'm sure there are other people out there like me that have been waiting for this kind of player to come along, so I for one am ready to plunck down the cash and buy one, and show the industry that .ogg is a viable format. Hopefully more players will come along.

    I wish Neuros the best of luck with their new product, and of course, kudos go out to the Xiph.org team for all of their hard work.

    -Jason Jones

    1. Re:Looks like what I've been waiting for by be-fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The OGG bit might be a kicker, but if you can afford to re-rip, GET AN IPOD. The 20GB model is supposed to be priced-dropped to $400 this week. You'll appreciate the big (small) difference in size.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Looks like what I've been waiting for by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      What about the Creative Nomad? It also stores GBs and the Nomad Zen is just a bit bigger than the iPod and costs less.

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:Looks like what I've been waiting for by AstroJetson · · Score: 1

      I bought one and didn't like it. Returned it for an Archos. It had two problems:
      1) The form factor was too big for me. Didn't fit easily into a pocket and since I use mine at the gym a lot, that was a show stopper.
      2) Couldn't get it to work with Linux; an even bigger show stopper. I tried two different things. One was a GTK+ app that lets you drag and drop to the device a la File Manager; the other was a kernel module that mounts it like a disk drive. I wasn't able to get either to recognize the device. Maybe I could have if I'd futzed around with them some more, but I didn't feel I should have to. With the Archos I just $ mount /mnt/usb and it just works. The Archos has its own problems, mind you, but it's much better than the Nomad, imo.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
  14. One of the benedits of ogg... by WPIDalamar · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's one benefit of Ogg that many people miss... compaines can use it in their products, whithout paying a royalty, and without worrying about the libraries changing (since they can distribute the libraries). For applications other than music players (such as games) that play sound, it's perfect. Who wants to use a system supplied mp3 library that may or may not work with your application 5 revisions down the road?

    1. Re:One of the benedits of ogg... by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I'm not mistaken (99% sure I'm not), UT2003 uses ogg for all of it's music.

      Not the only game I've seen using ogg either!

      --
      No Comment.
    2. Re:One of the benedits of ogg... by qoncept · · Score: 1
      Who wants to use a system supplied mp3 library that may or may not work with your application 5 revisions down the road?

      I don't understand what you're talking about. Can you explain? I have mp3s that I downloaded 6 years ago that work in Winplay3 and Winamp 3.

      --
      Whale
    3. Re:One of the benedits of ogg... by scotch · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and you should ship your own STL, standard C lib, ODBC libs, GUI toolkit, print drivers, and graphics drivers with your app, too. Who knows whether the system supplied versions of the same will work with your application 5 revision down the road?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    4. Re:One of the benedits of ogg... by suitti · · Score: 1
      compaines can use it in their products, without paying a royalty
      This is a cost issue. I recently got a DVD player that happens to play mp3's - for $50. I can't imagine that the royalty was very much.

      and without worrying about the libraries changing
      I can get the source to notlame, an mp3 encoder, for free. Am I missing something?

      I also recently got a radio/CD/mp3 player for my car - $145 US installed. My 15 year old car's radio died, and I decided to replace it. So now, my computer (linux), my DVD player (which is hooked up to the main stereo), and my car can play mp3 CDs.

      The Ogg format seems to get better compression. But notlame seems to get about 11x compression for CDs, retaining high quality. On a 700 MB CD, I can get about 14.25 hours of music. That's at least 12, and often 14 CDs per disc.

      Since I don't want to bring my $15+ CDs around in the car, I copy them anyway. mp3's allow me to use fewer disks, and have shuffle play behave like a disk jockey that knows my choices, and there are no commercials, and it even works in long tunnels...

      Sure, I'd like to be able to get 17 CDs per disc, but the mp3 players are already on the market, cheap, and work.

      --
      -- Stephen.
    5. Re:One of the benedits of ogg... by 5lash · · Score: 1

      Yeah i remember seein that and thinkin "hey, cool!". I'm sure more games are gonna start doing it in the future

    6. Re:One of the benedits of ogg... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      All the recent games I have played have used Ogg, Mafia, for example, uses a whole lot of open source stuff like zlib and Ogg. I think it's already become a de-facto standard, behind the scenes for most people.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  15. Indeed. by Compact+Dick · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What this means for me is that I can play my oggs in my friend's car without the aid of any doohickey cable or any other crap like that. All he needs is an FM receiver. A truly useful [and I do not use the word lightly here] innovation. Wonder why no one ever thought of it before...

    I really wouldn't worry about the RIAA here - more likely is the FCC who dictates frequency spectrum allocation, but the transmitting range should be short enough to satisfy their requirements.

    1. Re:Indeed. by cjpez · · Score: 4, Informative
      Wonder why no one ever thought of it before...
      Um, they have. Drop by your local Radio Shack. For fifteen bucks you can buy a little device that plugs into the headphones jack on any portable device and broadcasts it on a channel of your choice (well, usually there's a choice of maybe four channels to try). This is how we listen to cassette tapes in my girlfriend's car, which only has a CD player. That said, it is pretty cool that it's built right into the device.
    2. Re:Indeed. by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      Its also a new feature on phones making their way to the mainstream. Used as a speakerphone device ;)

    3. Re:Indeed. by fobbman · · Score: 1

      I really wouldn't worry about the RIAA here - more likely is the FCC who dictates frequency spectrum allocation, but the transmitting range should be short enough to satisfy their requirements.

      Shouldn't be a problem. There are already a bunch of CD changers that broadcast to your car FM radio to avoid having to make a physical connection between the changer and the deck.

    4. Re:Indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cassette Tapes???? Live in the NOW!

    5. Re:Indeed. by cjpez · · Score: 1

      Heh. Generally I do (though I'm liable to make some references to vinyl and prying from dead hands, but that's another issue), but the books-on-tape you can get from the library to make long car rides more enjoyable generally tend to come in cassette format. Our library is starting to stock more books-on-CD, but tape is by far the most readily available format they have now...

    6. Re:Indeed. by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      Drop by your local Radio Shack. For fifteen bucks you can buy a little device that plugs into the headphones jack on any portable device and broadcasts it on a channel of your choice (well, usually there's a choice of maybe four channels to try).

      I bought the Radio Shack thing 2 years ago - or maybe a different model; I think it was more expensive. However the radio would not pick up the reception, since the antenna was shielded all the way to the trunk. So I fished a wire to the trunk and sorta got it to work. But then I discovered my then-laptop (Gateway Solo 2300) would only play MP3s with the cover open, due an APM feature that apparently could not be defeated. (It would play in halting interrupted bursts due to the low-power mode. I hate APM I can't control - if I want a compilation to run at full, battery-draining speed while I drive home that should be my choice.) Anyway the whole setup was so awkward I finally stopped using it.

    7. Re:Indeed. by nexthec · · Score: 1

      When I saw the mention of cassette I knew exactly where you were going with their use ;-> I used to make a 2100 mile car trip through the ass end of Candada and Alaska twice a year, and boy does having an entertaining story help. Even for 8 hour rides. Tho, thankfully Libraries are starting to carry CD's now. Speaking of, I have on to cop at home. hmmmmm.....

  16. Almost Perfect by entrigant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it had usb2, firewire 800, and bluetooth support this thing would be damn near perfect. The ability to transmit music via FM radio is already hella neat. I like this thing.. although it is a wee bit expensive :(.

    1. Re:Almost Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >although it is a wee bit expensive

      Do really you think adding in USB2, firewire 800, and bluetooth will make it any cheaper?

      -------

      from www.snpp.com
      Jim Hope: Very good. Now I want you all to imagine the perfect toy. What would it be like?

      Terri: [holding stuffed animal] It should be soft and cuddly.

      Bart: Yeah, with lots of firepower.

      Milhouse: Its eyes should be telescopes! No,
      periscopes! No, microscopes! Can you come back to me?

      Nelson: It should be full of surprises.

      Milhouse: It should never stop dancing.

      Martin: It should need accessories.
      -----

      In all seriousness, I'd love to to see power efficient Wi-Fi, and some advanced AdHoc/P2P networking built in. Imagine being able to share songs with people all around you!

    2. Re:Almost Perfect by entrigant · · Score: 1

      In my dreamed up reality, adding those things would reduce the price by $300. NO ONE CAN TAKE AWAY MY RIGHT TO DREAM!!! :)

  17. But wait.. by termos · · Score: 1

    But does it play MP3s as well? .. oh, wait.

    --
    Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
  18. For speech, use Speex by Compact+Dick · · Score: 3, Informative


    If you're using Ogg Vorbis for recording lectures, I suggest you switch to Speex. From the website:

    The Speex project aims to build a patent-free, Open Source/Free Software voice codec. Unlike other codecs like MP3 and Ogg Vorbis, Speex is designed to compress voice at bitrates in the 2-45kbps range. Possible applications include VoIP, internet audio streaming, archiving of speech data (e.g. voice mail), and audio books. In some sense, it is meant to be complementary to the Ogg Vorbis codec.

  19. cool by simontek2 · · Score: 0

    schweet

    --
    SimonTek
  20. Nex IIe player by nicedream · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There have been several rumors lately that the Nex IIe from Frontier Labs will support Oggs RealSoonNow (tm).

    Link to yahoo group thread.

    1. Re:Nex IIe player by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I e-mailed them recently asking for a time-frame. Their only comment was that they are working on it. Personally, I wouldn't hold my breath, although a CF-based, $100 Ogg player is better than the Neuros IMHO.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Nex IIe player by ed1park · · Score: 1

      I just so happened to purchase one last week. And so far I'm pretty damn happy. :)

      Nex IIe player $89
      Compact Flash 1GB $215

      shopping.yahoo.com

      The reasons I went with this route:
      My HD based Dlink RoqIt and CD based player flakes out in severe cold and the batteries drain quick (couple hours). I don't like to use car AC adatpers because of the cable clutter. And both devices have skipped while in the car. (Annoying)

      Compact Flash Players...

      Pros-
      -Compact Flash is a standard and gets bigger and cheaper all the time, and is compatible with dig cameras, etc. (Sony's SmartMedia is stuck at 128)
      -No moving parts (NO SKIP, less susceptible to heat/cold)
      -Long battery life. (supposedly 15 hours on 2 AA's, which is convenient since I have tons of rechargeable NiMH batteries)
      -Tiny as hell.
      -There's even a car adapter.
      -Will support OGG.

      Cons-
      -The interface needs to be improved. I need an easier way to traverse large lists of mp3's.
      -It should remember where it left off after powering down the player.
      -The nexIIe only supports directory's 1 level deep

      Note: I haven't had a chance to upgrade the firmware yet. Perhaps these things have been addressed...

  21. same here by timothy · · Score: 1

    the iRiver is what I'm waiting for. Slim, decent battery life, plays CD-R/RWs ... when that plays ogg, I want one for my car. Heck, that would be incentive enough to upgrade my terrible speakers! :)

    Flash media is nice, hard drives can hold quite a bit at a time, etc, but now that CD burning is (given the context of regular computers users) more of a standard item than a luxury, I'd much rather have my audio stuff on CDs. Portable, replaceable, etc. Could be that flash media will one day be cheap enough that I stop caring that way, but for now, I could put several weeks worth of Car Talk on one CD, and *not* have to erase it when I wanted to put on the next several weeks.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my IRiver IMP-350. It's the best buy I ever made. I just hope they add Ogg soon as I don't encode to Ogg only because my Slim X doesn't support it.

    2. Re:same here by Toutatis · · Score: 1

      It's the same for me. If iRiver release a firmware with ogg support I'll encode all my Audio-CDs to that format.

      What really annoyies me is iRiver's lack of information on their progress adding ogg support. All the information we get is from the people at Vorbis.

  22. Don't go with the 20GB drive! Well, sorta... by raygundan · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 128MB Neuros player can be upgraded via a backpack to be exactly the same as the 20GB unit. Total price for the 128MB player and the 20GB backpack is only $430, just $30 more than the 20GB unit. The 20GB version is much larger and heavier, and cannot be "downgraded" to be the same as the 128MB unit. By going with the 128MB unit and a backpack, you can have a small, light, solid-state player for the gym (or whatever) and a 20GB backpack to hold all of your music, too. With the 20GB backpack on, it is *identical* to the 20GB unit. The 128MB piece is not available as a backpack, though.

    If you jog with it, this is definitely the route to go. Tiny player for jogging, plug in the backpack for huge capacity.

  23. Nex II player by N8w8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, Frontier Labs expects to have ogg support ready for their Nex II player in Q2 2003.

    1. Re:Nex II player by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to sound rude, (I'm a NEXII owner and have been waiting a LONG time for this) but how do you know q2 2003? I've looked on their site, and couldn't find any info. :(

      I've received email from them about this before and was informed that they are indeed working on it. But I've never heard a date from them.

      --

      AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    2. Re:Nex II player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the NEXII Yahoo group.

      ---------- Forwarded Message ----------

      Subject: Re: OGG support...
      Date: February 24, 2003 12:58 am
      From: "frontier labs"
      To: "Matthew Bevan"

      -------------
      Dear Sir,

      It is coming along. We are aiming to release a new firmware with Ogg Vorbis
      within the 1st half of 2003.

      Thank you.

      Customer Support
      Frontier Labs.

  24. Nice but... by arvindn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a Good Thing for sure, but keep in mind that the important thing is to help the average Joe see the benefits of Ogg. Sending your mom the CD you ripped in ogg format is way more useful than preaching benefits of ogg on slashdot.

  25. FCC by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

    The FCC allows unlicensed low-power FM broadcasts without a license. This is how drive-in movie theaters usually work--you listen using your car's sound system. I'm sure someone here can post the exact limits the FCC imposes on such broadcasts, but they're certainly much more generous than this device would require.

    1. Re:FCC by damiam · · Score: 3, Funny
      unlicensed low-power FM broadcasts without a license

      As opposed to unlicensed broadcasts with a license? :-)

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:FCC by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      As opposed to unlicensed broadcasts with a license? :-)

      Don't be silly! It's opposed to licensed broadcasts without a license!

      And suddenly, things started making sence.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    3. Re:FCC by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure someone here can post the exact limits the FCC imposes on such broadcasts

      Try this link...unlicensed FM broadcasting is limited to a field strength of 250 V/m at a distance of 3 m from the antenna.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:FCC by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "The FCC allows unlicensed low-power FM broadcasts without a license"

      Don't try this in the United Kingdom.

    5. Re: FCC by ae · · Score: 1

      Is anyone aware of what rules apply in various parts of Europe?

      --
      Blog Ho
  26. Neat and Nifty by hrieke · · Score: 1

    But why can't people hire Apple's design firm or at least be 'enspired' by the iPod?

    And, while we're tossing out wish lists, more file formats to play, can't someone make the damn thing play everything under the sun? Why not use an engine design that allow for plug-ins, ala WinAmp?

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Neat and Nifty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why can't people hire Apple's design firm or at least be 'enspired' by the iPod?

      Because that usually results in a letter from Apple's lawyers.

    2. Re:Neat and Nifty by be-fan · · Score: 0, Troll

      It wouldn't matter. Only Apple can get the 1.8" drives at the moment, so everything else will be bigger. The iPod just slides under the "too big to pocket" limit. Even something just slightly larger (the Nomad Zen, for example) is too big.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Neat and Nifty by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. There is no "Apple's design firm". Apple does the design themselves.

      2. Probably because you can't fit that kind of functionality into a $5 chip in an embedded device. MP3 players use hardware decoders that cannot be easily reprogrammed.

    4. Re:Neat and Nifty by paulychamp · · Score: 1

      The Jukebox Zen looks fairly iPod 'enspired' in my opinion.

  27. FLAC? by moncyb · · Score: 1

    On one of the Neuros surveys, it asked which new format you prefer they add support, and FLAC was one of them. I thought FLAC was a lossless format so one could record and edit sound files, not for listening? Do audiophiles really notice the difference between a high quality ogg/mp3 and FLAC? I don't notice any distortions with a high quality ogg vs the original. Is the FLAC file smaller? Logically and from what I've seen, the FLAC file should be bigger. It is lossless after all...

    1. Re:FLAC? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought FLAC was a lossless format so one could record and edit sound files, not for listening

      Yup. You can certainly listen to it though.

      Do audiophiles really notice the difference between a high quality ogg/mp3 and FLAC?

      Not with a portable player and earbuds, they don't.

      Is the FLAC file smaller?

      No. It's much larger. At the bitrates I usually feel comfortable with, FLAC tends to be over five times as large as ogg. FLAC on this player would be more a gimmick than a useful feature.

    2. Re:FLAC? by Junta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      FLAC is indeed lossless, and is also indeed large. Yes, audiophiles do insist that all lossy compression is unbearable. Even if they couldn't tell the difference, they would still make the claims I'm sure. Else how could they call themselves audiophiles?

      As for myself, I think Vorbis acheives the best quality to size ratio. If there are artifiacts, they aren't as irritating as mp3 artifiacts, since I notice mp3 artifacts and don't Vorbis (until you get past 128 kbps, at which point I can't tell anything about an mp3. For listening on mediocre at best headphones in public with noise around me, I would say a 64 kbps vorbis would be good enough, not so about mp3.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:FLAC? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      This is a true story. I use OGG on a regular basis, encoded with quality=-1. How you say?

      I carry around a radio station library on 2 CDRs, all OGG encoded at quality=-1. That equates to about 40kbps. What I've found is that most places where I set up shop have pretty lowsy sound systems. They're designed for power, not for good sound. I plyed an OGG -1 encoded file and compared it to the original CD. While a few of us could tell the difference, the general consensus was that without the original CD to compare it to, there's no way you would know. OGG has definitely proven itself to me. Encoding at anything higher than 128kbps is wasted space in my tests. YMMV, of course, but for the average consumer, OGG can give you about he same quality as MP3 in about half the size.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    4. Re:FLAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLAC on this player would be more a gimmick than a useful feature.

      FLAC compresses roughly by 50%, and that translates to something in the neighborhood of 5MB per minute of music. So thats still 4000 minutes (over 65 hours of music) on a 20GB disk. While I agree that the quality is probably imperceptible on earbuds, it'd be nice to be able to listen to your music in addition to being able to carry it uncompressed in a USB mass storage device for trading with the buddies.

      Of course, with USB 1.1, as other posters have mentioned, trading songs will be this players weakness.

    5. Re:FLAC? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I'm an audiophile, of sorts. I listen to my music on studio monitors and play with analog synths if that counts. I noticed that anything above 160kbps MP3 is nearly identical to the original CD, and ogg can almost make it down to 128kbps maintaining similar quality. Personally I prefer 160kbps oggs, but usually I just get lazy and encode everything around 256 in case I get picky sometime down the road. I hate reencoding stuff. Should do it the right way the first time.

      But yeah, you're on the right track. In my Zaurus I have a 256MB flash card to store my music on. If I can learn how to either grab a 64kbps stream from those 256kbps files or reencode it all for my portables, I should be able to store about 4 or 5 hours of music on a card the size of a quarter. At 256kbps I currently have over an hour of music on there with over 100MB free.

  28. There is already a Zaurus media player plugin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have built the plugin for the Qtopia media player on the Sharp Zaurus SL5500 myself a few weeks ago. You can also find someone else's build as an IPKG on http://www.killefiz.de/.
    And the Zaurus could accomodate a CF harddisk (1gig)... I'm not saying that it would run off the battery for long tho.
    Also, I heard that the integer only decoder (Tremor) used less power than the built-in MP3 one, so battery life as affected by that is supposed to be longer (10 percent I read someplace).

    1. Re:There is already a Zaurus media player plugin by 5etanta · · Score: 1

      I've played with this, but you are quite correct, it works well but kills the battery in no time flat! It also takes a long time to load up and play the file. Final verdict, cool but not yet useful. Brian P Casey

      --
      "I see lots of Pengins, is that good?" "Thats good Dad, click yes."
    2. Re:There is already a Zaurus media player plugin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I use XMMS for the Zaurus to play ogg files, as well as others.

  29. Bah, this isn't that big of a deal... by ActiveSX · · Score: 1, Informative

    Now Xiph.org merchandise, however, is something I've been waiting a long time for. Go buy some, kids. The Xiph dudes get some cash out of it, and you get to pimp your fly audio compression.

  30. Wow by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In other words, more than my main desktop computer cost.

    I'm assuming you're talking about the 20GB version, but even so...you built your computer system (with a display) for less than $400? Did you buy it used or something?

    1. Re:Wow by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Its not hard. You can get a brand new Lindows computer for $200.

    2. Re:Wow by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My monitor is one they were getting rid of at work, it's 20 inches, from 1993, and sometimes the screen turns kinda pink, but if you bang it, it comes back. :)

      I have about 4 other computers, some better than my primary one (one I use for security video capture has a huge hard disk and lots of vid capture cards).

      But my main system I primarily use did indeed cost a little less than $400 total. K7SEM + 900Mhz Duron + 20GB hard disk + 256 RAM + Evercase + Antec 300W + CD-R/Floppy. The floppy was from my old computer, but other than that, it was all new components, brand name RAM, etc.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Wow by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Without a monitor and with a smaller (10gigs if I remember correctly) HD.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Wow by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      And how does your gym like it when you set that up out on the floor?

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    5. Re:Wow by dotgain · · Score: 0

      I think his point is: It is expensive, for what it is, never mind what you're comparing it to. Me, I don't buy expensive, new or complete computer systems. Dunno why, that's just how it's happened. I've never needed to updrade all {comp |monitor |keyb+mouse |printer |scanner |etc} all at once.

  31. I want to upgrade, not go sideways by yelims · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love my Rio SP250. I have a fairly large CD collection, and I love being able to just switch CD's and have a different portion of my collection.

    But my question is, why would I want to make a lateral move to something that plays .ogg files off of CD (vs. my RIO which plays mp3 off of CD)?

    What I would really like to see is a DVD +/- R solution. Then I could have 4.7GB vs. 700MB of music ready to go.

    Am I just dreaming, or is there a market for this besides me?

    1. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by elgaard · · Score: 1

      Well, the Kiss-450 supports OGG and DVD-R

      http://www.kiss-technology.com/news/content.asp? id =48

      So with OGG on portables, CD-R/DVD-R players, and
      Linux/windows we can finally make the move.

    2. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by _aa_ · · Score: 1

      The values in the vorbis format are supposedly better quality, better compression, and lack of goofy liscensing. The quality is debatable I suppose, but I believe that the low to medium grade DACs you'll find in most consumer portable digital music machines supersedes the codec as the primary detriment to sound quality in most cases. Vorbis does use less space to store the same length recording than an mp3. This is primarily because it uses a smaller bitrate for a comparative quality of sound. And again, I'll let you draw your own conclusions about the quality. The mp3 codec's liscensing from the Fraunhoffer Institute will probably have little noticable effect on consumers, but some could argue that it's liscensing has hampered technological advancement in related fields.

      By switching to vorbis you could possibly fit more audio in the same space, or alternativly, better quality in the same space. For small 128mb devices, this may not be a noticeable adjustment.

    3. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by evilviper · · Score: 1

      IMHO, CDs are too big. If someone was to come out with MiniDVDs, then a player that would support them, that would be cool.

      Then again, With MiniCDs holding 200+MB, that would be more than enough to make that useful as well.

      As I've said with every comment so far, if it wasn't for Sony's SCMS and NetMD restrictions, MiniDisc would blow all of these existing players, and even potential ideas away.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I love my Rio Volt SP250. It has the capability to be upgraded to include an ogg decoder, as soon as SonicBlue decides to write the code (which in my estimation would probably take one coder one day at the most seeing how ogg decoders are open source and they would only have to convert it to their hardware). I was hoping that I could find a hack to get ogg working on the Rio SP250, however I was unable to find anything. Instead, I just converted my files from ogg to 192 kbps mp3s which sound better anyway cause I can run them through the equalizer in xmms.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    5. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by DoctorRad · · Score: 1
      Mini-DVD-RAM drives have recently been seen on Hitachi MPEG-2 camcorders, so the portable drive technology is there. I agree this would be a damn good removable format both for audio and short video clips.

      I doubt it would prize me away from my iPod though...

      Dr. Matt...

    6. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by OneFix · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umh, it's iRiver that makes the RioVolt...They also do firmware upgrades...

      So, they are the one to pester...of course, the iMP-250 is not available from iRiver America (exclusitivity agreements)...

      But, the SlimX series (iMP-350 and iMP-400) are more likely to get Ogg Vorbis support...

      From what I hear the SlimX players are more powerful than previous players...

      So, it's not likely that your 250 will get support...maybe the iMP-150 (which seems to be the only early model still being produced)...of course, you should check out the FAQ first...

    7. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      uhhh....my Rio Volt (I don't know if the original poster was talking about a Rio Volt but thats what I am talking about) is definetly made by Sonic Blue (may have still been called Diamond MM when I bought it). Go here to see what I mean.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    8. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by OneFix · · Score: 1

      No it's not...go read the FAQ...there's actually been a recent upgrade to the player that adds advanced anti-skip protection and increases battery life by up to an hour...

      The RioVolt SP-100 is directly upgradable with the iRiver iMP-100 firmware...the SP-250 requires a search & replace with the iMP-250 name...

      iRiver makes the player, it is rebadged as a RioVolt, but it's the same player...iRiver is actually selling the newer models in the US now....I guess SonicBlue thought the SlimX design wasn't the way to go...

    9. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Wow...thanks. I never realized this. Well, I really don't need the ogg support. It would be nice, but my collection is in mp3 format so this player works out. I'm just glad that you told me where I can find the latest firmware upgrades. Thanks a lot.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    10. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by OneFix · · Score: 1

      And you should really look at Ogg Vorbis a little more...the file size will be the same with Ogg Vorbis as an MP3 with the same bit rate, but the Ogg Vorbis file will be higher quality.

      This means you can have smaller files that sound just as good...to hear how good Ogg Vorbis files can be, try encoding a file with -q0 and you'll see what I mean (a 3-4 minute file should be ~1-1.5M)...

      It uses advanced acoustic modeling to do quality based encoding...something not built into MP3 (Lame tries to approximate this)...

      If you want to talk raw bit rate, Vorbis can do higher bit rates as well (640max I think...current encoders can only do a max of 320 but the format allows for it), but the real reason to use Vorbis is better sounding, smaller sized files...I mean, isn't that the ultimate goal of lossy compression???

      As a matter of fact, Ogg Media (Generally VP3...sometimes XviD + Vorbis) is becoming the preferred format for some Anime Fan-Subbers...for a good look at how to do OGM, look here and here...

      What's even better about Ogg Vorbis is the format allows for tuning of algorithms even now (after the format is frozen)...

      You should also check out the Dare To Compare page on Xiph's own site...

    11. Re:I want to upgrade, not go sideways by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Yea, I believe that ogg is better than mp3. It's just that when I want to take my music with me I still have to convert the ogg files to mp3 ones, so in the end I will be listening to mp3.

      --
      SIGFAULT
  32. Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a current 3th yearr post secondery student, I think Speex would be perfect for my recording of lextures. Just one problem: the Speex site does not render correctly in my Opera 7.01 browser. Once the open source comunity starts supportting standards in the web, I will support thier format. I will continuto use Windows Media Audio format for my recordding of lextures.

    1. Re:Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, http://www.speex.org is valid XHTML 1.0 Strict The Open Source community suggest that you get a better browser.

    2. Re:Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, I'm a huge Opera fan. I've been using it since 4.0.

      But geez, it's pretty obvious that the misrendering is Opera's fault. 7.01 is a brand new rendering engine, and .01 means "practically still beta, a couple big bugs fixed". They're working on it.

      Opera 6.05 renders the page fine. Try using that.

  33. the transmitter by raygundan · · Score: 5, Informative

    It has a *very* limited range. Like you, and maybe the car next to you, if you both have your windows open and the other driver has a good antenna. Hell of a lot cleaner than a tape adapter, and easier than pulling your stereo out to add an RF modulator so that you can plug the thing directly in.

    1. Re:the transmitter by Emmettfish · · Score: 1
      It has a *very* limited range. Like you, and maybe the car next to you, if you both have your windows open and the other driver has a good antenna. Hell of a lot cleaner than a tape adapter, and easier than pulling your stereo out to add an RF modulator so that you can plug the thing directly in.

      The Neuros has a port for an RF booster/antenna. Curious, no? :)

      Emmett Plant
      CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

  34. Reverse Engineer Firmware by zachjb · · Score: 1

    I was wondering how hard it would be to reverse engineer some firmware for the CD MP3 players. I use a Riovolt SP-100. Now Rio hasn't updated their firmware in forever, but you can use their Korean cousin's firmware (iRiver).

    Would this be possible and feasible? Or should we just wait until the company does it themselves?

    --

    --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
    1. Re:Reverse Engineer Firmware by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      iRiver is working on Ogg/Vorbis support.
      I think it would be _much_ safer to wait until they release it.

      They have allready said they've got it working, but are working on the quality of it.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    2. Re:Reverse Engineer Firmware by zachjb · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I knew that they were talking about adding support, but I didn't know if they actually were working on it.

      Thanks for the info.

      But what about other MP3 players? Would it be hard to reverse engineer their firmware.

      --

      --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
    3. Re:Reverse Engineer Firmware by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      I imagine it wouldn't be too hard actually (not like the xbox, as the firmware probably isn't protected)

      But, the cost of screwing up your mp3-player (we need another name: "mp3/ogg-player" *eww*) is a bit to high for some people. And anyway, the newer mp3-players will probably have ogg support too, though don't look for it in the next comming generation, but the one following.

      And, (I'm taking a big guess here) there will even be cheap discmans with ogg support in 3 to 4 years.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    4. Re:Reverse Engineer Firmware by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I found even more info:

      E-mail on the iRiver Forums about the status of Ogg/Vorbis in their players.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  35. Re:Don't go with the 20GB drive! Well, sorta... by arkanes · · Score: 1

    If you can easily move songs from the backpack to the flash memory this would be one handy little puppy.

  36. Can anyone say ... by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zaurus? Sharp's zaurus has supported several ogg players for ages. And it's more than just a digital music recorder/player. I've been drooling over the damn thing for months, but cannot bring myself to spend the $800CAN for one of these things yet. Perhaps next week when I go consultant full time and can write off the PDA as a business expense.

    --
    :wq
  37. only usb1.1 by alanak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was thinking - this is pretty cool. Then I saw it connects to your computer via usb 1.1. Who in their right mind would develop a new product with a 20GB harddrive and stick a measly USB 1.1 connection on it? There's no way that's going to work without frustrating every user

    1. Re:only usb1.1 by 10Ghz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ummmm.... How often would you be transferring files to that thing? I don't know about you, but it has enough space to hold my mp3-collection four times over! Just leave it transferring files while you sleep or something, problem solved. You would not be transferring 20 gigs of data every other day or something.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:only usb1.1 by AstroJetson · · Score: 1

      Exactly, or you can do what I do and rip directly to the thing. Encoding speed is less than transfer speed so even if it had USB2, I'd never notice.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    3. Re:only usb1.1 by starbuzz · · Score: 1
      Well, an external 20GB storage device has other uses besides holding just music, notably acting as a backup device, and mobile at that. I keep a subset of my home dir and my digital photo collection on an Archos (a recent one with USB2). Soon after I started in this mode I bought a USB2 adapter (Adaptec USB2connect, AUA-1420) because the transfer times over USB1.1 are just intolerable for transferring more than a few MB.

      BTW: I recommend Unison to sync.

    4. Re:only usb1.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's a reason for not including USB 2 why?

      Other people might notice. Other people might ALREADY have their entire collection encoded! Maybe they also want to use the device as a handy data transport and routinely copy 10 gigs of stuff to and from it.

      I love how when YOU don't have a use for something that's some sort of reason why NO ONE ELSE would or can have a use for it. Pretty typical of a Linux Luser.

  38. finally by doodzed · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is great that they added in an fm transmitter, but this may be the mp3 player for me for another reason. They added in mp3 recording with a line in. That means I can go, but a couple good mikes and record every show I go to. Hopefully the quality will be great.

    --
    It's not the size of your stack that matters, it's how you push and pop
  39. Connections by HalfFlat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This device looks really nice: switchable piggyback storage, FM transmittery thing, not too heavy, not too bulky, 20Gb, etc. etc. Of course ogg support is a big plus too. It could be the iPod competition we've all been waiting for! But ...

    USB 1.1?! What were they thinking? How could they get so close and still drop the bundle?! Transfering a CD's worth of music onto the device would take well over a minute at any decent quality. Transferring a collection onto the drive would take hours. If there were no alternatives, then sure, it's certainly not too bad. But with a disk attached to the device, there's no good reason why transfers couldn't be ten times as fast, if only they used USB2 or firewire.

    As a portable harddrive, USB1.1 speeds are apalling.

    Would putting firewire or USB2 on really have been so hard? As it stands, the player seems to be in the 'so close but' category.

    1. Re:Connections by 10Ghz · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Transfering a CD's worth of music onto the device would take well over a minute at any decent quality.


      yes! I can't wait for that long! I must have it immediately!

      Seriously, are you really yhat busy that you can't wait for that long?

      Transferring a collection onto the drive would take hours.


      I assume you would be filling the 20gigs entirely? How often would you do that? Not very often I would imagine. Propably only once. Why not leave it transferring files while you sleep for example? Or would you be constantly moving 20 gigs of files in to that thing? I don't think so. Once you move your files there, that's it. After that, you would only make incremental additions, and USB1.1 is good enough for that.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:Connections by tuffy · · Score: 1
      I assume you would be filling the 20gigs entirely? How often would you do that? Not very often I would imagine. Propably only once. Why not leave it transferring files while you sleep for example?

      By my calculations, at 12.5mbit/sec over USB1.1, filling the *entire* 20GBytes of hard drive space would take a little over three and a half hours. In real time, that's less than half of an eight hour workday or a little longer than it takes to watch the entire "Fellowship of the Ring: Extended Version". It's not as zippy as USB2.0 or FireWire speeds, naturally, but I think the slowness is bearable since one isn't going to refill the whole unit very often.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Connections by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      USB 1.1?! What were they thinking?

      Probably something along the lines of "I wish FireWire and USB2 were actually widespread, oh well, too bad, we'll use USB1.1 because that way all our customers can use it without buying an expansion card".

      And how often do you ship 20gig of music around anyway?

    4. Re:Connections by bmarklein · · Score: 1, Redundant

      USB 2.0 is backwards compatible with USB 1.1.

    5. Re:Connections by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Well, you can use a USB 2.0 device with a USB 1.1 only computer. It will only transfer data at the slower USB 1.1 rate, but it will still work. There is no reason (outside of whatever the increased cost of the onboard USB 2.0 chip) to not put USB 2.0 on this thing.

    6. Re:Connections by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Would putting firewire or USB2 on really have been so hard? As it stands, the player seems to be in the 'so close but' category.

      I would guess that sticking firewire on the product would reduce its attractiveness given than for the majority of PC owners you'd have to open up your case to install the PCI card.

      Not everyone is happy about opening up their PC. Most just want to plug it in and forget about it.

      When you're trying to sell a product that is moderately niche as it is (not everyone on the planet listens to MP3's as opposed to, say, CD's) the last thing you want to do is make it even more niche with specific requirements.

      But yes, the omission of USB 2.0 was a bit silly.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:Connections by raygundan · · Score: 1

      It's not the music that's an issue-- how often do you upload all 20GB? It's using the device as a portable HDD that gets killed by USB1.1.

      USB2.0 is backwards compatible with USB1.1, and would have been a perfect choice. Creative's Zen ipod clone uses Firewire AND USB1.1. Either solution would have covered speed and wide compatibility.

    8. Re:Connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that there was no reason whatsoever to not include the faster interface. NONE! NADA! ZIP! This is a terrible mistake. People will buy the nomad with USB2 on it over this for that one reason. It could have had it all, instead it blows it bigtime.

      But they have good company, most all mp3 players have at least one huge cripling defect. Oh well...

    9. Re:Connections by zuralin · · Score: 1

      actually searching the forums on neurosaudio.com you'll find http://www.neurosaudio.com/community/forum/topic.a sp?TOPIC_ID=19&SearchTerms=usb,1.1 where the 'head of product development' provides an answer to your question

    10. Re:Connections by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 1

      I burn CDs at 4x, mainly because my burner won't go any faster, but even if it did, I've had enough bad experiences with discs burned at 24x that I'm willing to wait for it. Seriously, not everybody requires blazing speed, especially for a one-time thing like filling a 20G hard drive with oggs. In this case, I chose the extra feature of being able to read DVDs over fast burning speeds, and I think a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice transfer speed for the ability to play oggs. I know I would.

    11. Re:Connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Your name Michael?

    12. Re:Connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to ask that here, 3.141592etc, Is your name Michael?

  40. Other ogg hardware by RiffRafff · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to this site: http://www.mixstix.com/ they already have ogg playback.

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    1. Re:Other ogg hardware by Lin_Matt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the software they ship with the MixStix will play ogg, not the hardware (http://www.mixstix.com/onlinehelp.htm). Besides, would you really want a 256MB ogg player??? ;)

  41. Buy the parts yourself by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 4, Informative

    YAMPP MP3 players can be made for the parts for about 80 dollars... perhaps less if you can find things on clearance. It is nowhere near $12, however.

    Likewise, many MP3 players are significantly lower than 150 dollars. Poking around on Shopping.yahoo.com, you can find the the Ampigo3 for 50, the Samsung YEPP for 50, the JamP3 for 40, the Audiovox MP-1000 for 40, and the D-Link DMP-100 for 35 dollars. Rio PMP 300's are still available on ebay for $50 or less. They're all about the same quality as the "latest" MP3 players from sonicblue, and will compare favorably to that $20 CD walkman for high-impact activities like treadmill jogging, cycling, etc.

    If you look hard, you can find 20GB Archos Jukeboxes for $150.

    If you want an MP3 player, now is a great time. Actually, last year was a great time. Now isn't that bad though. Do some legwork and start saving those batteries.

    --
    This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    1. Re:Buy the parts yourself by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      That YAMPP site is awesome. Its a pity it has not had more of a mention.
      I would love to see some portable MP3 and capture device I could customize in such a way to connect to a bunch of microcontrollers or Palm PCs. Imagine using them for sound capture and recognition. Nice!
      The fact that the artical specific player can play oggs is cool - but these Yampp ones could be modified to do the same surely? Build a pure ogg device.
      If anyone does - please post links for the source and schematics (you shouldnt need to change the hardware at all) here. I can imagine this is fairly easy - even trivial if you know OGG well.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    2. Re:Buy the parts yourself by Dukebytes · · Score: 1
      Wow. I was looking in the wrong places.

      Honestly, when I read your post - I thought Bull Shit... :) But I went out and looked for the DMP-100 and BOOM $35.00. It has 32MB of RAM and looks like a neat little unit. I work out for about 45 min - so this should be about right for several upbeat songs.

      Thanks for the info - can't beat /. eh :)

      Duke

      --

      FreeBSD: Nothing runs like a daemon with a pitch fork.
    3. Re:Buy the parts yourself by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Ogg Vorbis is not making the player more expensive, it's very high-end! I kind of like the Neuros. Go OGG go!

  42. Yopy by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

    I've been uploading Oggs from Linux onto my Yopy and playing them since last summer. Mind you, I had to hack the (at that time) rudimentary fixed precision decoder library into ogg123 and modify the included gqmpeg a bit to play nice with it, but it works fine and sounds much better. Just gotta get me a bigger MMC card sometime :)

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
  43. Flash-card MP3 Player?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know of a flash-card compatible (Compact Flash II, whatever) mp3 player? All the flash mp3 players I have seen on the market use built-in flash, or proprietary flash. Why hasn't anyone developed one that will work with the generic flash cards on the market, such as the ones that work with my camera?

  44. My 2 cents by JSkills · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've got the Archos 20 GB multimedia Jukebox. Not only does it hold hundreds of CDs worth of music and allow me to record to MP3 - but it holds all of my digital photos and I can display them on the screen. Who needs to carry photos in your wallet anyway? It also plays movies. Yes you have to make sure they're a specific file type (DivX MP4), but I will admit to watching Dude, where's my Car on the train ride home ;-)

    The only thing I wish this thing did is have an FM Radio and (why not) support Ogg.

    This Nueron thang sounds like it's got some nice features, but the lack of the video/picture functionality, plus being $100 more, I think I'm still ok for now.

    Of course, something new and better will come out soon enough to make me start thinking about selling my Archos on eBay (like I did with my 10 GB model) and upgrading ...

  45. More efficient language by carambola5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is great news for those of us looking to become more efficient in our daily lives. Now, instead of wasting five syllables on "MP3 Player," we can use just 3 with "Ogg Player." Terrific!

    Furthering the process, I have found a wonderous take on the English Language called "Newspeak." It's fairly new, being created only in 1984, but the efficiency and importance of every word is astounding. I suggest you all try it out.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  46. Missed the point. by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    The parent wasn't talking about being able to decode files 5 or 6 revs down the road. He was talking about being able to use the libraries that implement the codec years down the line. It is easier to keep an evolving app in sync with a standard if the standard is fully documented. Also, one does not have to trust the OS vendor to keep this process easy.

  47. Palm TungstenT (Re:Flash-card MP3 Player??) by sjonke · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Palm Tungsten T works great as an MP3 and Ogg player with either of the shareware programs Aeroplayer or Pocket Tunes installed. Aeroplayer is free for ogg use, but not free for MP3. Pocket Tunes is not free for either. In any case both are pretty cheap. The TT uses standard MMC and SD cards. Not to mention that the Tungsten T is an excellent Palm OS 5 PDA.

    --
    --- What?
  48. Ogg on SonicBlue's Pearl by figa · · Score: 5, Informative

    SonicBlue's Pearl plays Ogg. It was demoed at CES this year, so it should be on the streets by this fall. A SonicBlue employee reported on RioWorld that it supports Ogg. It also has an ethernet base, which is unusual and forward thinking.

    1. Re:Ogg on SonicBlue's Pearl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "..should be on the streets by this fall."

      There's an old saying: You snooze, you lose. By this fall I will have already bought something. They need to be coming out with this product now. People have been asking for Vorbis players for years. Anyone who is just now starting to develop theirs, is going to miss the $$$boat$$$.

  49. Re:Supported by manufacturer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple. Just go to CompSA instead.

  50. iPod support by jarnot · · Score: 1

    Now if I could only get Ogg support for my iPod...

    --
    -------------------------

    slashdot@com.jarnot (swap the domain)

  51. Low power AM/FM stations by MamasGun · · Score: 1

    Up until a few years ago, the only way to listen to Los Angeles Valley College's radio station was to be on campus with a portable radio. It too used a drive-in type transmitter Actually in the case of KVCM it was an AM transmitter. [eew!] When I was on staff, I was hearing "United Artists Cable (East SFV cable franchise) is going to carry us Real Soon Now" but that didn't happen until about 10 years after I left. There was also talk of a "community radio license" (low-power FM stations that have their transmissions restricted to a very small radius) but of course that option never really got a chance. The FCC first proposed that, then withdrew it under pressure from Big Radio.

    --
    "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
    -- Jack Valenti
  52. Another OGG player by dabadab · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's also a german firm, Pontis, coming out with an ogg capable player. (Note: .ogg support is in the works)
    It works with CompactFlash, Secure Digital and Multimedia Card memcards (and acts also as an USB card reader/storage device). It lacks the ability to record and the radio, but I for me these are not necessary. Also, it can be used as a handheld game console, although so far it seems there are two games for it :)
    I have seen it for 95 Euros, so it is not that expensive. The only thing keeping me back from buyin it is its size and weight (nearly 100g - though that's half what Neuros weighs) - I want to see an .ogg firmware for the Diva MP3 player (a sexy, 36 g device :)
    (Yes, I love the idea of memcard based players: I have a digital camera with CF cards so I don't want to spend on built-in memory (that can not be expanded) and CDs are too big and require lots of power to operate so there will never be really small and low-powered CD-based players)

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  53. 128M paltry amount of flash memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They ought to have 512MB minimum so they'd at least hold one travelling day's worth of tunes (approx 8 hours), and have battery life long enough to run that long between recharges/replacements too.

  54. Seals the deal by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    If this product comes as promised (with OGG support) it will be purchased by me. I was browsing through my Crutchfield catalog last night, picking out something, ended up throwing the catalog away in disgust because not a single player had Ogg compatibility (my entire collection is self-ripped Ogg files).

    With this player and its features (especially like the MyFi radio broadcast feature) it WILL be in my possession as shortly after March 1st as humanly possible! And please, please, please let that be before mid-March and the annual road trip season.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  55. I agree. by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I really like their modular design, the built-in FM, and the ability to ID songs from the radio by audio fingerprint. But USB 1.1?! I will wait for USB 2.0, or Firewire+USB1.1. (gotta have that compatibility with old stuff as well as the speed!!)

  56. obligatory Simpsons quotation by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Transfering a CD's worth of music onto the device would take well over a minute at any decent quality.

    Moe: Oh boy, the deep fryers here..I got it used from the Navy--you can flash-fry a buffalo in 40 seconds!

    Homer: 40 seconds?! But I want it now!

  57. audiophiles by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who recently bought what he claimed was 5.2 channel surround sound. So I asked him, "Uh, what's the difference between that and good old 5.1 channel surround sound?"

    Apparently the extra 0.1 is a "virtual" speaker that only "audiophiles" can hear.

    I then spent the next half hour explaining the "Emporer has no clothes" story.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  58. Ogg is dieing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ogg is basically dead......so this may give it some life but not enough people will buy the player to make it worth the companies money...

    1. Re:Ogg is dieing by Emmettfish · · Score: 4, Funny
      Ogg is basically dead......so this may give it some life but not enough people will buy the player to make it worth the companies money...

      "It will never come out."

      "It will never be as good as mp3."

      "It will never be better than mp3."

      "No one will use it but Linux folks."

      "Now that you've lost funding, you'll never survive."

      "You'll be shut down by Thomson/Fraunhofer."

      "No hardware company will ever be interested in it."

      Xiph.org Foundation - Proving assholes wrong since 1993.

      Emmett Plant
      CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

    2. Re:Ogg is dieing by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      "No one will use it but Linux folks." You may be technically correct. But both windows users and the single Mac OS X having a couple of oggs in their collection downloaded them by accident. Joke, not flame.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  59. How many songs do you add at once? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    At 1 MB per second (the practical maximum for USB 1.x), a 20 GB hard disk would take 20,000 seconds (about 5+1/2 hours) to fill. Fill it overnight.

    Got a whole bunch of audio files you ripped from the 3 CDs you just bought at Worst Buy? Just put the new recordings on the device. At 90 MB per CD after compression, it shouldn't take longer than five minutes to sync your device over USB 1.1, and if your OS multitasks well, you should be able to send a folder of .ogg or .mp3 files as you encode it.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:How many songs do you add at once? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's a reason for not including USB 2 why? Why aren't we all using 386 machines? So what if it takes an hour to compress an MP3 file? Slower is better? Slower is as good? Are you a mac person by any chance?

  60. Apple's design firm by k2r · · Score: 1

    > But why can't people hire Apple's design firm

    Because Jonathan Ive works for Apple in-house since '92. And I doubt that Apple's own design group would design an MP3-Player (or a notebook or a all-in-one desktop) for any other company than themselves.

    Of course, there was a time when Frog, an external company designed the beige boxes, but this is gone now.
    I heared Frod does icons and window themes for XP now, but I think that's just some jealous people talking stupid stuff about this excellent company :-)

    k2r

  61. How about a free-format programmable player? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
    Okay, you've got MP3 portable players, and now one or more that can play Ogg Vorbis format.

    But why not make a player that you can re-program yourself, to support any format, provided the player has enough CPU power to process it? And, while you're at it, why not deliver a software development kit to help with supporting future formats, with it?

    Or better (maybe a nice project for /.-ers?): develop a player in the form of a freely available hardware design, so that anyone can build it for him/herself? That is, with a hardware design developed in a similar way as the Ogg audio format was developed.

    1. Re:How about a free-format programmable player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But why not make a player that you can re-program yourself, to support any format, provided the player has enough CPU power to process it?
      What you want is a general-purpose personal computer. Perhaps a Zaurus (the PC that pretends to be a PDA) would make you happy.
      Or better (maybe a nice project for /.-ers?): develop a player in the form of a freely available hardware design, so that anyone can build it for him/herself?
      Ah, I see. Forget the Zaurus, you want to the reference design for IBM's PDA.
  62. WinCE? by unicorn · · Score: 1

    slightly off topic. But there doesn't seem to be an OGG player, for WinCE units? Surprising, that there is a player for the Zaurus, but not WinCE.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  63. Re:It's about time (OGG vs MP3) by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are some experiments being done and some listening data available, mostly on hydrogenaudio.org site. Seems like the general consensus at this point is that OGG is somewhat better than MP3 at the average rate about 128Kbps, but at the rates 200Kbps+ MP3 is better (meaning 'less artifacts'). At the rates lower than 128Kbps (where MP3 simply doesn't cut), OGG does a good job and apparently is better than WMA. So seems like OGG at this time competes with alternative lossy compressors at the rates 128Kbps and lower. If you tend to record at 200Kbps average, like the latest LAME default settings, you may as well stick with MP3 unless of course you are against MP3 'in principle'.

  64. Hey, Sonic Blue! by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    How about a firmware upgrade for the Rio Volt series, to let those CD players handle Ogg too? Huh? How's about it?

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  65. Neuros is almost "it" by Jahf · · Score: 1
    I've been waiting for that portable that has a balance of features that work for me ... the Neuros almost has "it" (see this page for the Neuros list of features/specs) . The things that would perfect it for me:

    1) Linux synchronization software (they currently claim to only support Windows). Normally I would figure on the community to support the device, but this one looks like it probably has some sync features that need to come from the device owner (like the HiSi feature that lets you ID songs from the FM tuner).

    2) USB 2.0 ... Neuros is a USB 1.1 device ... transferring 5000 songs on 1.1 is going to be slow. I don't have a USB 2.0 PC yet, but I will shortly. I'm not to concerned with firewire support.

    3) (not a demand but they suggested it and I want it) timed recording of FM stations ... like a TiVo for NPR ... I've wanted this in an easy to use format for a LONG time. I dearly hope it can record FM while playing other recordings ... schweet if so.

    4) Ogg support, but this is what this article was about so I'll be optimistic.

    Otherwise, the unit has everything else I've been looking for (I really like that the HD is removable while the unit is still playable via the internal storage). I'm probably going to wait 6 months to see if they add any of these features, but if not it's feature-rich enough that I'll happily get this thing.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    1. Re:Neuros is almost "it" by Jahf · · Score: 1

      For those interested in the same things with this player, I posted my feedback (with some additions) on their forums. It should be more productive to do feature requests there if you are willing to register for their forums.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  66. Batteries galore by LinuxGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check here for a good supplier for NiMH batteries and chargers. I don't work for them and I actually purchased my Ray-o-vac 1 hour charger and batteries from Walmart, but nimhbattery has a much better selection of batteries and chargers.

    Some things I have learned about NiMH stuff:
    - Buy a good charger. Cheap chargers ( probably first gen) generally work by timer not actual battery condition. The Radio Shack fast charger almost cooked a new set of batteries for me.

    - Get second generation batteries, they are properly vented for the fast chargers and have higher current capacity ( 1800-2000mAh for AA size).

    - Get a charger that matches your needs, even if you have to pay more. My current charger allows home or mobile charging (12v cig lighter plug) which is great for digital camera use. I bought three other cheaper chargers and regret the purchases, features and quality will actually be important.

    - Don't let other people borrow your charger or batteries, you may never see them again. If you do let someone borrow your batteries, then make sure you explain that they should not discard them after they are discharged. Don't ask!

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Batteries galore by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 1

      To add to this list.

      -Mark pairs of batteries. Most rechargers recharge two at a time, and with NIMH batteries you don't want to mix and match.

      -If your player only takes one AA, make sure to drive both into the ground before attempting a recharge. This driving into the ground needs to happen with a digital device (like your MP3 Player) that has a minimum charge level, as NIMH batteries tend to die if you attach them to a lightbulb overnight.

      -These will not be the last pair of batteries you will ever own, but may be the last recharger. Go cheap on the cells, but splurge on the charger. Cells will be replaced, and the price difference of a 2000 mAh isn't justified by the miniscule power difference from a 1800 mAh. If you need more juice that badly, wire some leads to an external pack.

      --
      This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    2. Re:Batteries galore by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      I don't worry about battery pairs since both my chargers will do single cells just fine. Also, I just shorted a AA cell on my 10A digital meter and it was able to supply 2.2A. Not bad for a cell that size. That works out to about 50 minutes for my 1850mAh cells at max output, great for rechargables.

      I have different sets of batteries and the cheaper ones are not capable of supplying their rated power. The cheaper 1700mAh no name cells last about 60% as long as my energizer 1850mAh NiMH cells in the same devices ( MP3 player and flashlight).

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  67. Emmett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't he fired from Slashdot?

    1. Re:Emmett? by Emmettfish · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wasn't he fired from Slashdot?

      No, I wasn't. I was promoted to the position of Editor-in-Chief of Linux.com, then I resigned from there a few months later citing editorial differences. Then I started a web publishing project called Binary Freedom which lives on at System Toolbox, which I still occasionally write for.

      I started a little comic/animation studio on the side, and went back to work as a UNIX Admin (which is what I was doing before I got involved in the whole web-journalism biz) at Digital Island/Exodus for about a year. I got cut in a massive acquisition layoff, chilled out for about a month and then started at Xiph at the request of the team here.

      Now I run Xiph full-time, and release free music on the 'net in my spare time.

      Wow, that was more than you really needed to know. But knowing is half the battle, etc.

      Emmett

  68. You mean the Irock 300W Wireless Music Adapter? by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:You mean the Irock 300W Wireless Music Adapter? by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1
    2. Re:You mean the Irock 300W Wireless Music Adapter? by cjpez · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's one anyway. Myself, I opted for the cheaper knockoff model at Radio Shack. But the iRock works a bit better (you get what you pay for, I suppose). I think it may even be some Radio Shack brand or something.

  69. Petition iRiver, etc by Synic · · Score: 1

    Why don't we just all make individual petitions and send them to iRiver and other companies that make flash upgradeable firmware (that you can dl off the net for free) ? It sounds like a more reasonable alternative to buying a whole new player!

  70. Too late by Cyno · · Score: 3, Informative

    Already got my own. Remember that Sharp Zaurus that came out a year or two ago? It makes an excellent ogg player. And it only cost me around $100 to upgrade the ram enough to store several hours of music. The advantage to using the Zaurus to these other devices is you can have your network and computers manage your music collection for you through ssh and rsync over an 802.11 net. Show me a $100 ogg player that can do it right now and you might get yourself a customer, if I didn't already have one.

  71. ogg player by scottp · · Score: 3, Informative

    I emailed frontierlabs and they said the firmware for ogg would be added to their website soon for the nexII (model). It'll take CF and IBM microdrives for about $115 USD.

    1. Re:ogg player by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      If someone wanted to do some serious hacking, One could go about righting there own firmware for the Riovolt CD/MP3 player. it says it can suport other formats via new firmware but there is still the posiblity of not having enough processing power.

  72. Re:Synchronization manager?! by Emmettfish · · Score: 1
    Synchronization manager? Why the fuck would we want something like that? This gives me flashbacks to the pre-NexII days of the Rio sync manager! Why the hell not to just mount it as a removable drive and be done with it?

    Well, gosh. Here I thought that an XML-aware database that would allow you to sync your XMMS playlists and things in addition to using it as a removable drive would be a useful feature. Seems people agree with me on this one.

    Emmett Plant
    CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

  73. Neuros Not quite Ready for Prime Time? by dberger · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Neuros HD was reviewed a few days ago in the Mercury News - and the author had some less than stellar things to say about it. The software issues he mentioned will, I'm sure, be eventually worked out - but apparently the unit uses USB 1 (gack!) rather than Firewire or USB2.

    Anyone care to compute out how long it would take to actually fill that 20GB hard drive that USB 1 speed?

  74. Re:PocketMVP by benzapp · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  75. What about equalizer? by dfj225 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to say that on my linux box, mp3s sound much better than ogg files because i have the ability to use the equalizer with the mp3s. I guess ogg could sound better and it could be true that i'm not using the best driver. Either way, I'm sure that everyone would enjoy an eq in their portable players.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:What about equalizer? by Lin_Matt · · Score: 1

      What player are you using? I can eq oggs using xmms just like mp3s...

    2. Re:What about equalizer? by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      I use xmms...and the equalizer doesn't seem to have any effect on ogg files...could just be something wrong w/ my install. For reference I'm using the xmms version that came w/ RedHat 8.0

      --
      SIGFAULT
    3. Re:What about equalizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never seen xmms eq'ing ogg.

      But hey, go get rid those junk squeakers and get yourself Real Soviet ones :-) /me's more than happy with that kind of setup. No eq's, thanks, fed up with made-up sound. :-)

    4. Re:What about equalizer? by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      eh...actually my speakers aren't that bad (They are Boston Acustics). I think it might have something to do with the drive for the sound card I'm using.

      --
      SIGFAULT
  76. Re:Ogg Vorbis is Pure Shit by Emmettfish · · Score: 3, Funny
    So the next time you download an Ogg formatted music file, watch out. When borrowing a mixed CD from a friend encodded in Ogg Vorbis, watch out. Because someone is surely watching you.

    Yes, this is all true. We've got special plans to have Ogg Vorbis files Shock-Enabled[tm]; If you're listening to an Ogg Vorbis file and you think about copying it for a friend, a special patented algorithm will combine the electrical synapses in your brain and route the power directly to your spinal column, killing you instantly.

    It's certainly a cost-savings over the all-weather troops that we've been using for the past few years.

    Remember to keep your tinfoil hat on tight. :)

    Emmett Plant
    CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

  77. Excuse me, but... by iamacat · · Score: 1

    What exactly do you do with your pink monitor to make it come back?

    1. Re:Excuse me, but... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You don't bang your monitor? Man, you are missing out. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Excuse me, but... by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Mine is missing the red. The red comes and goes as it pleases, but not my main monitor. It's an old 14 in. IBM PS/1. Came with my 486 so I guess I shouldn't complain. Wish I could easily fix it, banging does no good.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  78. The best device on the market... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
    I for one hope that Ogg/MP3 combo mini-CD players make it onto the market soon. One of the best devices out there is the Memorex MPD8081 mini-CD player. Yes, yes, it only plays small form-factor miniCDs and not full size CDs. But consider it as an alternative to relatively expensive solid state MP3 players - battery life on this unit is fabulous, far better than most CD players (because it spins up, reads 120 seconds of a song into memory then spins down, saving lots of battery life, though it's still not quite as long-lasting as a good solid state player). It displays the full MP3 info on screen, has simple, very easy to use controls, you can arrange your MP3s into directories before you burn them, the miniCD-Rs cost roughly 25 cents a pop (compare to a 256 meg compact flash card or memory stick... ugh), and it uses 2 AA batteries. Sound quality is pretty damned good. Size and weight - circular, a few centimeters less diameter than a full-sized CD, but much less bulky and lighter than most CD players (this was key - I wanted something that I could fit in my jacket pocket for skiing). And 200 megs is a lot of space - and you can bring several miniCDs of MP3s with you, they are so damned small. The only thing lacking from this unit is a backlight for the display, which can be modestly annoying. The upside, however, is the cost - I paid 56 dollars for it, new (from buy.com or Amazon, I think). Oh yeah, and these units DON'T skip - even when walking, jogging, rowing or skiing (I've used it for all these activities without any skips - sometimes it can do a 1-2 second "lag" between songs though).


    I think these units are the most underrated out there - I mean, if you really want to put your entire music collection in a portable box, the hard drive units are your only choice. If you don't mind that every 3+ hours of listening you'll have to swap out mini-CDs (i.e. you don't miss the 600+ megs of a full sized CD), you want somewhat more portability for working out or sports use, you don't want to spend a lot of money on a solid state player with several hundred megs of storage, and prefer the convenience of throwing a mini-CDR into your CD burner instead of plugging in a cable and syncing up MP3s to your solid state player, and 55 dollars sounds like a good price, you should definitely consider one of these units.


    And if it played OGGs too, and had a radio-broadcast feature for use in the car, that would be the bomb.

  79. Car Players by Vince · · Score: 1

    My car player has been able to play Vorbis ever since Tremor came out.

  80. Warning about shopping at CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do all your shopping with them in person, at a real store. Also open the boxed package, in plain view of store personnel, to inspect the contents before leaving the store. CompUSA routinely re-shrinkwraps returned merchanise and puts it back on shelves or in warehouse inventory without placing any notice on the package the item has been returned and re-wrapped. Not all of their employees are honest either. I once bought an expensive Ultra160 SCSI card off the shelf. The shrinkwrapping looked perfect like it came from Adaptec. Opened it up at the checkout line, and inside the box was nothing but an empty antistatic bag. My friend bought an ATI Radeon 9000 card and opened the box at the checkout. Inside it was a cheapo Chaintech Geforce2 card.

  81. MP3 to Ogg converters? Ogg on Windoze? (Ogg n00b) by KaMiKa-Z77 · · Score: 1

    I have a sizable collection of MP3s ('bout 40Gb @ 256K MP3) from converting my entire CD collection to MP3's. I've heard wonders about Ogg, however given the hours I've spent ripping/tagging my music (and the fact that more than half my CD's have been stolen over the years), are there any MP3 to Ogg converters out there?
    Would my tag's be preserved if I converted to Ogg?
    Now for my friends that have Windoze, what could they use to play these on? Does Winamp have a plugin of some sorts?

    --
    Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous? - Calvin
  82. Neither one is a good reason by iamacat · · Score: 1
    I buy a few patented items every time I go to the grocery store. It doesn't bother me if there is a patent on that stand-up toothpaste dispenser and I don't see why it should, as long as it doesn't prevent me from getting the product and it only makes up a small fraction of its price. Why should it be different when paying $2 extra for that portable player or iTunes?

    There is a loose end of non-commercial encoders, decoders and streams. But so far, mp3 consortium is just letting them exist and going after commercial licenses (that's as far as I know, any corrections?). Another good solution would be for them to ask end users go to some website and pay $5 for the right to use any MP3 software of their choice.

    Yes, mp3 consortium could start going after LAME and WinAmp, harassing P2P users and otherwise turn evil. And that's a good thing that OGG and WMA are around to keep them reasonable. But they didn't turn evil yet and in the worst case I'll lose a couple of hundred bucks then buying new devices.

    As for quality, interoperability is far more important. If you make an 128Khz, CBR MP3, you can give it to about anyone and be sure they'll be able to play it. With OGG or WMA, a Mac user will be at least forced to do some painful things to hear the sound. And with portable players all bets are off. Even Linux-based Zaurus doesn't come with OGG support by default.

    Besides, mp3pro is not bad if you want quality at low bandwidth and still works with regular MP3 players in a pinch. Why not give it a try if you are not worried about interoperability?

    1. Re:Neither one is a good reason by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Informative
      According to your nick, you are a cat, but I suspect you are in fact part of some FUD spreading team, or at least woefully mislead. " I buy a few patented items every time I go to the grocery store. It doesn't bother me if there is a patent on that stand-up toothpaste dispenser and I don't see why it should, as long as it doesn't prevent me from getting the product and it only makes up a small fraction of its price. Why should it be different when paying $2 extra for that portable player or iTunes?"

      If the patent owners on the toothpaste dispenser started charging at $50 royalty, obviously you would switch brands. If Thomson Conumer Electronics or MSFT started demanding outrageous royalties for MP3/WMA, you would switch to OGG, yes? Wait, your entire music collection is encoded in WMA ... you're out of luck until you re-encode. Maybe at the time this happens, you are running MSFT's super DRM operating system with palladium and you can't even transcode your WMA/MP3 to ogg because you don't want to pay to access them. We shouldn't just pay a small fee and settle for MP3/WMA because unlike the toothpaste, you entire history of useage of the product is what they use to force you to stay with it. Re-encoding an entire music selection is not easy work.

      " There is a loose end of non-commercial encoders, decoders and streams. But so far, mp3 consortium is just letting them exist and going after commercial licenses (that's as far as I know, any corrections?). Another good solution would be for them to ask end users go to some website and pay $5 for the right to use any MP3 software of their choice."

      Thompson shut down BladeENC which was an open source encoder with patent litigaton. Fraunhofer's original purpose for creating MP3 was clearly stated: They want to make money from patent royalties on streaming audio. That's why the original FHG encoder was so bad above 128 kbit/s. It was designed for low bitrate streaming -- most people did not have broadband back then and Napster did not exist. In the long run, they will not tolerate companies or individuals who make free products to compete with paid ones. They, like any commercial entity, are out to make money!

      " Yes, mp3 consortium could start going after LAME and WinAmp, harassing P2P users and otherwise turn evil. And that's a good thing that OGG and WMA are around to keep them reasonable. But they didn't turn evil yet and in the worst case I'll lose a couple of hundred bucks then buying new devices."

      Of course OGG is around to keep Thompson reasonable. Although Thompson has said that they think there's patent infringing code within OGG Vorbis. (You'd think they would know considering that it's open source.) As to losing a couple of hundred dollars on new devices, you're saying that you would PAY to get into a world where you use products where a company can just instantly decide that you have to pay additional fees to access your music collection, and you're happy with that?

      " As for quality, interoperability is far more important. If you make an 128Khz, CBR MP3, you can give it to about anyone and be sure they'll be able to play it. With OGG or WMA, a Mac user will be at least forced to do some painful things to hear the sound. And with portable players all bets are off. Even Linux-based Zaurus doesn't come with OGG support by default."

      This is what the people who stand to make a lot of money from you on patented audio formats WANT you to say and think. Apathy in changing formats will just let them snare you that much more easily. It is just like with banks -- I work in the banking industry and I know that it is only apathy that keeps most people banking with their bank. If they woke up and looked at their situation, they would probably be able to find a better deal where they get the same services at much less cost with higher interest rates for their savings.

      " Besides, mp3pro is not bad if you want quality at low bandwidth and still works with regular MP3 players in a pinch. Why not give it a try if you are not worried about interoperability?"

      Once you start going with mp3pro, you run into the same problems with mp3. The cycle of exploitation by patents starts again.

      If you were trying to write FUD, I hope you now realise that you need more practice because you are a poor FUD-spreader. If you honestly believed what you said, I hope you have learned something by reading this.

    2. Re:Neither one is a good reason by iamacat · · Score: 1
      You did say you work in the banking industry. Then of course you think about interest rates and services on regular basis. By contrast, I know someone who applied for a second bank account to get a sign on bonus and higher interest rates. Before long, she didn't know what is the balance in each account, got bounced checks, had to find charge-free ATMs for each account and was generally miserable. Most people are better off just staying with one big bank and not worrying about it.

      You are asking me to choose between possibly reencoding my library in the future and not being able to use it now. Give me a dual MP3 and OGG player that is light enough to jog with a shoulder band, lasts 10 hours on 1 AAA battery, sturdy enough to drop without ill effects and compatible with Windows, Mac and Linux so that I can transfer files.

      I am not a professional in digital audio and I just want to carry my music around with a minimum of hassle. MP3 consortium is not bothering me at the moment. If they ever do, I will switch. For example, MS bothered me enough with hangs and crashes to buy a Mac. I lost some WMA files that I recorded before I knew better, but I can just dust off my CDs and reencode them. And if you are talking about a "collection" from gnutella, well you are not the person likely to pay license fees anyway.

  83. Boy wont this cheese off the RIAA by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    Things like this which will record directly from FM to MP3/OGG people will not have to swap files online, they can just lift them off the radio like the good old days. Unless I am mistaken (happens way too often) it is 100% legal to record off the radio for personal use..

    --
    1. Re:Boy wont this cheese off the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also get them from digital satellite, and either from pay channels or from free ones. Its better than CD quality actually as they transmit at a higher bitrate.

  84. grrr.... by nacks1 · · Score: 1

    It seems that the neuros online store doesn't even have the player in stock at the moment and when I tried to use their secure page it seems to hate mozilla.... you would think they would want my money or something, but no...

  85. This is great, but where are the car players? by nvrrobx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a portable mp3 player I rarely use, but I use my Kenwood mp3 deck in my car all the time.

    I'd much rather use ogg vs. mp3, but until I can have a car player, I can't convert...

    *patiently waiting*

  86. when I listen to oggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I listen to the oggs I see the gnomes. Oh help they are taking my socks off.

  87. prior investment is the only hitch ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    I like everything you just said ;)

    However, the thing I see being a barrier to widespread acceptance of mini-CD players is that a lot of people have CD-Rs already packed with their converted files ... I have about 50 of my CDs ripped to Ogg files, all stored on (standard size) CDs now. Re-ripping, or even just file aggregation and resorting, would be a real pain, but one I'd consider if someone actually would come out with an ogg-capable miniplayer ... particularly for things I want (like radio broadcasts and audio books) 200MB is quite a bit ;)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  88. built-in FM transmitter ... by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    True, the fidelity is less than a wired connection ought to be, but the convenience is pretty amazing. Bingo: it's a car player :)

    These things were a pain when most car radios were analog, but with modern head units, you can lock on pretty well. The Neuros unit with a flash reader as well as the hard drive "backpack" looks fun, though I have not yet had a chance to use one. My car stereo does have a line-in, so I can compare the two ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  89. Non-replaceable battery? No thanks. by phr2 · · Score: 1
    Why do vendors keep getting this same bonehead idea over and over? Gadgets like the Ipaq handheld PC and the Norelco and Braun electric shavers and maybe the iPod mp3 player and now this Neuros thing, where the battery is sealed inside the unit. If the battery goes flat you can't swap it out for a charged one--your device is unuseable without external power until you've spent hours charging it. If the battery craps out (stops holding a charge), which they all do after a year or two, you have to send the thing in for service.

    Forget it! Imagine a cellular phone or or a camcorder with those kinds of limitations. Early laptops did have similar stupidity but the vendors wised up!

    Really, even swappable proprietary batteries are a pain in the neck. It's best to stick with good old standard NiMH AA's, or (if you really need li ion), use a standard camcorder pack that's available from multiple vendors.

    The Neuros player's features are kind of interesting but as a buyer, the battery issue kills my interest in it all by itself.

  90. Archos 20GB Has USB2 by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Would putting firewire or USB2 on really have been so hard? As it stands, the player seems to be in the 'so close but' category.

    Yeah that's right. My girlfriend's Archos 20GB Recorder cost half the list price for this Neuros and has USB2. *And* it's Mac-compatible, which is why it was chosen over the Nomad or other PC-only devices.

    --

    Da Blog
  91. Re:MP3 to Ogg converters? Ogg on Windoze? (Ogg n00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Winamp as of version 2.8 supports ogg. Use Winamp 3 for the full experience. There are some mp3 to ogg converters at http://www.vorbis.com just check the software page under your platform. Enjoy

  92. "Sound a lot better?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ogg finishes last on the sound quality test every time. All you are doing is making the world wsound a little worse by supporting it.

    1. Re:"Sound a lot better?" by Emmettfish · · Score: 4, Funny
      Ogg finishes last on the sound quality test every time. All you are doing is making the world wsound a little worse by supporting it.

      Congratulations, you win the box of Q-Tips.

      Emmett Plant
      CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

    2. Re:"Sound a lot better?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO the sound quality in vorbis is much better than mp3, but are portable ogg devices really needed?

      It's not that hard to encode everything to ogg and playback them on your pc and then if you want to listen them with portable mp3 player, just transcode the ogg to mp3 while moving the song to the player. That way you can use the devices already on market. And do you really need the extra sound quality while jogging/etc?

      My portable player supports 160kbps vbr and I think thats well enough quality while jogging, hell even 64kbps is enough, those small headphones aren't that great. Yes, I can tell the quality difference between 64kbps and 160kbps but my point here was that you can fit more than one or two albums in that way.

      The problem in this way is that you can't save the stuff from your mp3 player back to your pc, but that's not what the players were ment to do in first place.

  93. I got one word for you.... by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

    MSVCRT.DLL!!! :-)

  94. Linux: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trainling MS now and forever...

  95. Why aren't people asking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya know, I work for a major company that makes portable devices that play MP3 CDS. We've supported other formats in the past, yet we get so few requests for Ogg Vorbis. For people who seem to want this so badly, it's so rarely asked for at least at my company. Only MP3 and WMA.

    What's the deal folks? Why aren't you writing folks requesting Ogg?

  96. cheap cd-r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since flash is so quick, so handy and well just so damn cool I think my investment has already saved me tons over constantly recording new CD's. The modern floppy it is... lets sit down and talk about those portables that use flash memory and play nicely with Ogg!

  97. Interesting by Cyno · · Score: 1

    Some nice information I didn't know about minidiscs. :)

    But you can get a 256MB CF card for $100. Its stores around 250,000K of data, or about 2,000,000k. Compressing oggs at 128kbps still gives CD quality sound, equivelent to about 160kbps MP3s. That yields 15,625 seconds of audio or around 4 1/3 hours of CD quality music.

    The price is impractical, unless you weigh in the benefits. My ogg player connects to my network over 802.11. It stores my data on an SD card, about the same price, and I have the option of having a card range from 32MB to 1024MB. I can use ssh/scp and rsync to move and organize data. And in the future I can use these SD and CF cards in other devices. But its still $5 for 5 hours of minidiscs vs. $100 flash RAM solution.

    But let's say we don't care about CD quality music. What if we just need our entire collection of books on tape available on our PDA? Then we can store over 17 hours on that 256MB card or nearly 70 hours of audio on a 1024MB card. I guess it all depends on what you need it for.

    The only reason I don't use minidics is because it was a proprietary Sony format and the players cost $500. If the data really is $1 ea and the players have come down in price it might actually be worth it.

    1. Re:Interesting by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The price is impractical,

      You got that right.

      unless you weigh in the benefits.

      Believe me, I've looked long and hard at digital music player, and I've seen only a couple nominal benefits, that don't nearly make up for the large drawbacks.

      But let's say we don't care about CD quality music. What if we just need our entire collection of books on tape available on our PDA? Then we can store over 17 hours on that 256MB card or nearly 70 hours of audio on a 1024MB card. I guess it all depends on what you need it for.

      Sony figured that out some time ago. Since the introduction of the format, you could record in mono and double you recording time. Then, some time ago, they improved upon the concept, and gave MDs LP2 and LP4 modes, which can more than octuple (8x) the recording time of a Minidisc.

      Let's try your example... 70 hours on a 1GB CF card. In LP4 recording mode, you get 5 1/3 hours on a 70 Minute disc in Joint Stereo (according te the Minidisc.org FAQ on MDLP). That means you could fit that 70 hours on 14 MiniDiscs. Somehow, I don't think that you paid $14 for that 1GB CF card, and you probably were encoding in mono, so minidisc will give you joint stereo, and a higher bitrate at the same time.

      The only reason I don't use minidics is because it was a proprietary Sony format and the players cost $500.

      Well it's much have been a damn long time since you last looked at minidiscs. Just 2 years ago, my 4 year warranty on my portable minidisc recorder expired. At that time (6 years ago) the portable minidisc recorder was $400. I think you might have dismissed it too quickly. Some MP3 PLAYERS cost more NOW than MiniDisc RECORDERS did 7+ years ago, and Minidisc media was never anywhere near as expensive as CompactFlash cards. The MiniDisc players back then also had battery life comparable to the MP3 players of today.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Interesting by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Wow, you sound awefully passionate about minidiscs. How much is a minidisc recorder/player today? Does it allow you to extract the digital information to a computer or copy it back onto the minidisc for lossless data storage? Just curious.

    3. Re:Interesting by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Not really passionate per-se. It's an amazing format, which I've really loved since I started with it (about 6 years ago).

      I must say I AM annoyed by everyone that is so hyped about CF players, when they just don't make any sense. If you think I sound passionate now, just watch me when a thread starts up on how great Windows CE is... That's when I really start ranting!

      You can find all the prices at minidisco.com, or sony.com. minidisc.org will have links to different MD manufacturer's web-pages. The prices can vary a great deal, so I can't really quote a price.

      As for digital copying to/from a computer, it gets to be a fuzzy area. Sony's NetMD software allows you to copy files from your computer to the MD via USB, and with the same software you can copy those same tracks back to your computer. It will not let you copy the files off the disc if it was not put on the disc through the USB connection.

      That's not your only option though. Most MD recorders at least have S/PDIF digital inputs, and many have digital output as well. Using the Digital output, you can copy any parts of the minidiscs to your computer through a soundcard with digital inputs. There is even plenty of software that helps to syncronize the process.

      In addition, there is a GPL'd project that is working on an open source NetMD interface. It's quite possible that, once that software is working, they may be able to avoid the copy restrictions that Sony has imposed. I am certainly optomistic.

      That is the case for Sony's MiniDisc recorders, anyhow. It's quite possible that the other brands do not have the same restrictions. I am currently looking at Tascam, and other makers of professional MiniDisc recorders, hoping for similar features without the copy restrictions.

      Blah, blah, blah. I'm sure you can find more info than you ever wanted to know at minidisc.org.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Interesting by dublin · · Score: 1

      The only reason I don't use minidics is because it was a proprietary Sony format and the players cost $500. If the data really is $1 ea and the players have come down in price it might actually be worth it.

      The few folks I know that have minidisc players are not nearly so thrilled with them as people here seem to be. Always remember the following relationship:

      Sony:hardware::Microsoft:software

      For my money, almost any flash memory technology is vastly superior to the huge honking, battery-hungry MiniDisc. If these things were really any good, you'd think we'd see them in digital cameras, which is today's killer market for portable digital storage. Even Sony doesn't do that...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  98. USB 1.1 isn't 12.5mbit, it is 12mbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it doesn't actually go nearly that fast. You're looking at more than 8 hours, easy. For starters, you assume every sector is only written once. That's not the case, the catalog gets written over and over.

    Try using USB 1.1 to fill a 20G HD and get back to me at out it isn't bad.

  99. Just like Lisa by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    Ned Flanders is warming up the peewee football team he's coaching when Lisa appears at the gate.

    Lisa: What position have you got for me?

    [crowd gasps]

    Lisa: Thats right. A girl want to play football. How about that.

    Ned: Well, thats super-duper, Lisa. We've already got four girls on the team.

    Lisa: [let down] You do?

    Ned: Ah huh. But we'd love to have you onboard!

    Lisa: Well... football's not really my thing... after all [indignance returning]... what kind of civilised person would play a game with the skin of an innocent pig?!

    Ned: Well, actually, Lisa, these balls are synthetic!

    Janey: And for every ball you buy, a dollar goes to Amnesty International!

    Lisa: [verge of tears] I've gotta go.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  100. Re:MP3 to Ogg converters? Ogg on Windoze? (Ogg n00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to convert to ogg. Leave it as MP3s, converting it will make it much worse

  101. I'm not buying one... by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

    ...until it plays MP3's!

  102. Please, SOMEONE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make a portable MP3 device that has a MIC LEVEL input, a QUALITY A/D converter, and support for recording at HIGH BITRATES (>=320k) As far as I know, such a device does not yet exist.

    PLEASE, SOMEONE. LIBERATE ME FROM MY MD RECORDER.

  103. Load it any faster, and your CD shatters by yerricde · · Score: 1

    And that's a reason for not including USB 2 why?

    How much does a USB 2 device controller cost vs. a USB 1.x device controller?

    So what if it takes an hour to compress an MP3 file?

    I didn't say that. I claimed that a fellow could load the device with compressed audio files faster than he could compress them. There is a limit to the practical speed of compressing CD audio on a home computer, and that's the physical limit of how fast a CD can safely spin during digital audio extraction, somewhere around 48x. Even when Moore's Law gets us to the point where a PC can encode as fast as it rips, 48 times 192 kbps is still less than the 12 Mbps of USB.

    Are you a mac person by any chance?

    I currently use a PC running a Windows OS, but I did start out on Apple II and Macintosh computers.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  104. Still waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Portable player?
    I'll never walk that long!!

    I'm still waiting for the player in my car to play ogg, and the DVD-player at home

    Hans ( hwit@a-domani.nl )

  105. cd-r based ogg player? cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if we'll ever see a small computer(pda), that uses mini-cd-r's instead of compact flash? The minute a pda manufacturer decides to make one, flash will drop in price substantially. We need some competition to flash on pda's. As soon as color displays get reasonable, I suspect a whole bunch of "build your own pda" websites, which would be nice vs. paying out the arz for flash and proprietary applications that only run on specific pda devices. PDA's have managed to fragement very well, by making devices incompatible with one another; it's different from desktop computing whereby applications made for x86 will run on every x86desktop. Once we get some "standardized" pda hardware, I suspect we'll see the embedded computing revolution will be allow to mature. I'm disappointed in seeing compact move to their Xscale processor, a move microsoft loves, but as for adoption of pda's like desktops, it'll never happen until hardware makers decide to standardize. If only compact stuck with the strong arm, linux would rule, then adoption would be widespread; WAKE UP PDA MANUFACTURES! It's true the software drives the hardware market, yet it appears, that the manufacturers for whatever reason have decided to make the hardware drive the proprietary software market instead.

  106. Maybe the raw decoder.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    But, the Xbox at least will boost the sound levels on ripped tracks (which are internally WMA at some level, and sound like shit -- even vocals distort because of the shittyness of this codec).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  107. Looks great but a little immature by ThinkTiM · · Score: 1

    After work I headed off to CompUSA to have a look at one of these. It looks great, and I will watch it's evolution for a while with the thought to buy one when a few firmware patches are released. The UI is a little unintuitive, and it appeared to crash at least once while I was mucking around with the controls. Hopefully, at some point they'll sell the 128Mb sleeve separately so that we have the best of both worlds :)

  108. MP3 Players.... by sirwallyc · · Score: 0

    Just buy a Minidisc player/recorder/cheese-grater/thing-to-cuddle-up-t o-when-the-significant-other-is-out-of-town and be done with it.

    I have yet to see a portable solution that suits my needs better than Mindisc. When you look at all the +'s and -'s for each, Minidisc wins....everytime.

    And (this was mentioned previously in this thread) the battery life for Sony units is FANTASTIC! For God's sake, why can't solid-state units that have _no_ moving parts put even a dent in the lifespan that a single AA battery enjoys inside a Sony Minidisc player? (Other brands aren't too shabby, either.) It stuns me....

    No, OGG definitely has most other formats over a barrel when it comes to the bit-peeling feature....that's really cool, expecially when you start thinking about how it can help with portable units....

  109. Re:MP3 to Ogg converters? Ogg on Windoze? (Ogg n00 by bomba23 · · Score: 1

    winamp can do .ogg files. At least in winamp 3.0 without pluggins

  110. Re:Ogg Vorbis is Pure Shit by ryanvm · · Score: 1

    Hey Emmett,

    Congratulations on these latest agreements.

    I've got a question that I'm sure you could answer. Is Rio ever going to upgrade the firmware in the Rio Volt to play Ogg Vorbis? Thanks.

  111. Palm Tungsten ogg player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm very happy with the AeroPlayer. Plays ogg by default, needs a plugin for MP3.

    It's shareware, and you can find it here ..

    http://www.aerodromesoftware.com/

  112. Minidisc for PCs died early by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

    Or was I just imagining that?

    I saw the linked comment, too, and immediately thought of the mid-90's when I saw in a few MacMall catalogs a minidisc drive which I almost got for my Powerbook. Then after a couple months they just disappeared, never to be seen again. I always thought that was too bad, and yours and that linked post reinforce the positives about the media. Seemed like at least one version had non-cartridge versions of the discs, too.

    Of course if they upped the discs to the new light spectrums, got a few orders of magnitude improvement in storage... Hmm, I thought someone else did have a tiny-disc product along those lines, holding a DVD or so size of data.

    Here's hoping for something sturdy and usable,

    8-PP

  113. Fast-Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one thing I haven't seen listed as a feature (and therefore I suspect it isn't included) is Fast-Forward within a song. I've decided that I'm not buying another music player that lacks this feature. The other bummer is the USB 1 thing - no doubt there is some great reason they couldn't use USB 2, but it makes it much less appealing.

  114. Re:Ogg Vorbis is Pure Shit by Emmettfish · · Score: 1
    I've got a question that I'm sure you could answer. Is Rio ever going to upgrade the firmware in the Rio Volt to play Ogg Vorbis? Thanks.

    Why do you feel that I would be more qualified to answer this than, say, someone who works for the company that makes the Rio Volt? We're software developers; We don't know what's going on at companies all over the place.

    I don't know if Rio's going to upgrade the firmware, 'cause I don't work for SonicBLUE. Also; I work for Xiph, so I can't afford the call to Miss Cleo.

    Emmett Plant
    CEO, Xiph.org Foundation

  115. Re:Ogg Vorbis is Pure Shit by ryanvm · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I'm asking you because I've asked SonicBLUE and they don't answer. Perhaps I'm asking you because you're the CEO and I (incorrectly) assumed that you would know who you company is partnering with. Or perhaps I'm asking you because you're the one issuing press releases telling the community who IS releasing Vorbis decoders.

    In the future maybe you ought to consider reserving your semi-clever, vitriolic responses for people who AREN'T your supporters.

    Oh well, at least I gleaned some sort of information from this exchange: The "CEO" of Xiph is a patronizing asshole.

  116. Re:Synchronization manager?! by SailorBob · · Score: 1
    Well, gosh. Here I thought that an XML-aware database that would allow you to sync your XMMS playlists and things in addition to using it as a removable drive would be a useful feature. Seems people agree with me on this one.

    I'm sorry, but the press release linked to in the article only mentioned a sync manager, not anything else. The press release didn't say anything about being able to mount the player as a drive or anything else you just mentioned. Traditionally in the Win/Mac MP3 portable world having a "sync manager" typically means you can't mount the player drive or read/write it directly. Your above comment should have been part of the press release in order to avoid this type of confusion.

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

  117. Re:Ogg Vorbis is Pure Shit by Emmettfish · · Score: 1
    Oh, yes, I am, completely.

    I'm sorry I unloaded on you, but please understand that I get questions about 'Hardware Company X' just about 24-freaking-7. It would grate on your nerves, too.

    I don't think I responded well, but your remark wasn't exactly called for, either.

    Emmett

  118. Not on IPod -- yet. by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1

    I thought for sure that my IPod supported Ogg, but I did some more searching, and it is only ITunes that supported Ogg. I wonder if Apple can change that through a "BIOS" upgrade? Or is that impossible?

    --
    Very popular slashdot journal for adul
  119. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    skldfjkljklsR%^&(IXDRTYju187pkasdjbasdfbuil
    h;asvgy8p 23r1vyui135 2
    kmxsij90TYDFS$$b jkzxdjkl bjnk ;j nk;[][;-==-';[,
    [hjioasdvbnuio;buip^&(FTSD$%*VYUI:buio;sdf}[asdf']
    sdoihjfh(_YU*G&F^*CTY98y

    Now look what you've gone and done! You've broken it!

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...