Slashdot Mirror


Groovy Wristomo Cell Phone Announced

i4u writes "NTT DoCoMo announced WRISTOMO a new Wrist Phone built by Seiko. Recently Samsung announced the availability of their Wrist Phone at the CeBit 2003. The Wristomo Wrist Phone unique design lets users transform it into a handset. The phone supports web browsing with up to 64kbps. Wristomo can receive and transmit Emails with maximum size of 3,000 characters. The Watch can synchronize with MS Outlook via a data cable. The size of the Wrist Phone is 171.5x40.4x18.5mm, and it's weight is 113g. It is even water-proof. It supports continous talk-time for 120min. and 200 min. standby. It is even water-proof! Price expected to be 50,000yen."

171 comments

  1. Really Really waterproof by banana+fiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, this thing is waterproof.

    --
    Johns: Well, how does it look now? Riddick: Looks clear.
  2. don't forget, it's even waterproof! by VudooCrush · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have to hear it twice because I know I'll definitely be using my cellphone underwater.

    1. Re:don't forget, it's even waterproof! by Surak · · Score: 1

      We have to hear it twice because I know I'll definitely be using my cellphone underwater.

      Yeah, but all the Slashdot readers at Bikini Bottom might like that feature. After all, they are the secret power behind Slashdot. :)

    2. Re:don't forget, it's even waterproof! by jmoriarty · · Score: 1

      The waterproof comment demonstrates the increased efficiency brough to /. by the hard working editors. Rather than taking two separate articles to duplicate the same information, they can now repeat themselves in a single posting!

    3. Re:don't forget, it's even waterproof! by jmoriarty · · Score: 1

      So now that I've been thinking about this waterproof thing, maybe it isn't really about being used underwater. Since this expensive little piece of electronics sits on your wrist instead of on your hip, it is subject to a whole different sort of danger than a normal cellphone. Perhaps "water proof" is just the nicer way of saying it is really "sneeze proof".

    4. Re:don't forget, it's even waterproof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      using my cellphone underwater


      Well, after *I* use the restroom I wash my hands, which gets soap and water all over anything on my wrists. I can't imagine ever having a watch or other wrist device that's not some level of water-resistant.
    5. Re:don't forget, it's even waterproof! by Soko · · Score: 1

      Perhaps "water proof" is just the nicer way of saying it is really "sneeze proof".

      ...or, taking into account the stereotypical /.er, it's the nicer way of saying the wrist-phone is pr0n surfing proof. Brings a whole new meaning to "WAP" phone.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    6. Re:don't forget, it's even waterproof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is it Fecal Proof? You should check out the phone by McSiemens!

  3. water proof by greenalbatros · · Score: 0

    is it doubly water proof then?

    --
    this sig steers like a cow. and i can prove it
  4. Cellwatch by FireMotion · · Score: 1

    I've been using my cellphone as my clock for over a year now, since my "normal" watch died. I guess this could be the solution to my problem.

    Next problem is some cash I guess :P

    --
    http://www.inspirelight.net/
  5. Not to mention that by moonbender · · Score: 1

    It is even water-proof!

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  6. Okay, but I want a yellow fedora too. by Garg · · Score: 2, Funny

    And a daughter-in-law with antennae.

    Garg

    --
    Garg
    Alumnus, Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters
    1. Re:Okay, but I want a yellow fedora too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for posting this. I was gonna - my grandfather worked with Gould on the strip for several years, so you can understand my incentive to post, but now I don't have to!

  7. sync with cable? by cyril3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    sort of limits how deep your desk can be.

  8. Dick Tracy, eh? by dustmote · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering how long it would take them to get one of these. Since it might be harder for me to lose, this is an actual incentive for me to pony up the cash to pay for a cell phone that's decent, rather than just sticking with the one my cell service gave me for two dollars.

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
    1. Re:Dick Tracy, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harder to lose? I'm not so sure. The pictures show that you pop it off your wrist in order to hold it to your ear and use it as a handset. If you take it off all the time, how easy might it be for it to come off on its own accidentally? At the very least, you could set it down after a call and forget it, just as you would with a regular phone.

  9. wow they are getting smaller by sirinek · · Score: 1

    At this rate, in a few more years such technology will be so common that you'll be able to buy real working dick tracy watches from the gumball machine!

  10. standby? by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

    I can't read the link 'cause it's slashdoted. But do you mean it has a 200 hour standby instead of a 200 minute one?

    1. Re:standby? by radish · · Score: 1

      I would have thought so - my phone is 2 years old but it can still do a week between charges (depending on how much I use it for calls of course). That's 168 hours, and I know more recent models are a lot better, so 200 is no problem.

      A phone with 200 minute battery life would be completely useless!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:standby? by Yokaze · · Score: 2, Informative

      The NTT Docomo site is not slashdotted, but I fear that won't help you much either :).

      In the left column, the units are noted in brackets. The sign in brackets before 120 means minutes and the two before 200 stand for hours.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    3. Re:standby? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      No, here's the quote from the site quote

      <quote>It supports continous talk-time for 120min. and 200 min. standby.</quote>

      - Cut and pasted from the site, so either it's a typo, in which case they really need to proof-read, or it's accurate, in which case it's pretty useless.

  11. Maybe tiney isn't so good anymore by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 4, Funny


    My cell phone is 1"x3"x.5" and It's already tough enough to dial without a tooth pick. Soon /. articles will read "Sony debuts new HANDS, for smaller portable Devieces" Ahhh... the price we'll pay for convience. I long for the days when a cell phone was so big it could be used for self defense (swing that battery and become: Connan the Early Adopter!)

    1. Re:Maybe tiney isn't so good anymore by banana+fiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, really really small devices can be extremely hard to use. How many people still have a wrist-watch calculator?

      I've seen the remote-control on a watch thing (a guy in the office has one) - and it's a good idea because it has so few buttons.

      In the absence of an un-slashdotted web-page I'll have to assume it's not fully voice activated (you go girl, if it is). Web-browsing may also be a little - small :)

      Still, I'll be waiting until they get the 21" screen version :)

      --
      Johns: Well, how does it look now? Riddick: Looks clear.
    2. Re:Maybe tiney isn't so good anymore by mrtroy · · Score: 0, Funny

      Horrible for the teenage girl market these products are aimed at...
      "I am sorry, the hand you used to dial this phone is too fat. For a special dialing wand please mash your hand on the keypad *now*"
      "AHH! I AM FAT!!!"

      Can we really do this to our young teenage girls? Think of the spoiled CHILDREN!

      Bah, who buys their phone for how small it is? I buy them for how many lights they have on it.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:Maybe tiney isn't so good anymore by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

      It probably will support voice recongnition dialing.

    4. Re:Maybe tiney isn't so good anymore by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Now that would be cool. Imagine a tiney little PC with one of those projection keyboards and an, as yet uninvented (hint hint), 21" projection screen.

      Now THAT is progress! (but would it run linux?)

    5. Re:Maybe tiney isn't so good anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, that's the second post in a row with the word "tiney" in it. Is that the English spelling or is Slashdot full of illiterates?

  12. 200 min. standby! by iainl · · Score: 1

    WTF? Its a clever device, but if they can't give me at least 24 hours standby then its fairly useless in practical situations.

    These days I'm used to several days standby from my mobile phone; a wristwatch that needs to spend half its life tethered to a mains supply is daft.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  13. Rates of conversion... by Jooly+Rodney · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was initially surprised at the price -- 50,000 yen didn't used to be worth terribly much -- but given current exchange rates, this thing is going for about $420 USD.

    1. Re:Rates of conversion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When are you talking about? The yen is currently at around 120 to the dollar, and while it has been worse in the last two years, it's never realy gone over 135 or so. Five or six years it was 80 to the dollar.

    2. Re:Rates of conversion... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I was initially surprised at the price -- 50,000 yen didn't used to be worth terribly much -- but given current exchange rates, this thing is going for about $420 USD.

      Mod parent down, obviously no knowledge of Japanese currency charted over time.

      A month ago the yen was at 117, and a year ago was at 130. 5 years ago it was about 100 and before that it was at 80.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  14. Exclusive contract with DoRD by Exanerd · · Score: 1, Funny

    It may be difficult to get your hands on one though, since the Department of Redundancy Department is interested in acquiring all of them for their amazing water proofing. ... And they're water proof!

  15. The Best feature though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is even waterproof!!

    Laugh. It's funny.

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:The Best feature though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was only funny the first time. You thought it would still be as funny if you're the third person who posts it? *psh* Crazy dreamer.

  16. Wow.... by blingitybling · · Score: 1

    Imagine a......world closer to "Calling Dick Tracy".

    1. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IN SOVIET RUSSING, lame joke tells you!

  17. Cable?! by Malachi · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Blueeetoothhh.. BTH.. Common.. Down with the cables!

    --
    "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    1. Re:Cable?! by Sniper_beta · · Score: 1

      Couldn;t they make it so that all youd have to do is set the watch near the power station? sorta like in the electric toothbrushes? then all you would have to do is at night set the watch on the pad and in the morning its all charged up

    2. Re:Cable?! by mwood · · Score: 1

      "Couldn;t they make it so that all youd have to do is set the watch near the power station?"

      You mean, Tesla coils and stuff like that? Because a charger base won't help very much if the battery only lasts 3 1/2 hours.

    3. Re:Cable?! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Magnetic induction. Like the SoniCare toothbrush, or any number of other devices. Dunno what that has to do with a tesla coil.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Cable?! by Malachi · · Score: 1

      That'd be a great idea. I never knew that the cooktop I use is the same idea that powers the toothbrush I use.

      magnetic induction rox ;)

      -M-

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    5. Re:Cable?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common? Strange choice of word. Or did you mean "Come on"?

    6. Re:Cable?! by PhilMills · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I kind of hope it's got a headphone jack on it somewhere. We could finally live up to all those sci-fi movies where people have data/power cables strapped to their bulging biceps going down to some wrist-based doodad. Think of how amazingly futuristic you'd look.

      Though, a bluetooth headset is equally futuristic...

      Random humor: does it have a truly hands-free option for the paraplegics of society?

      -PhilMills

      --
      Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, will be quoted out of context on
  18. Re:april 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you please post your GPS coordinates, so that we can make sure we get you while we're at it?

  19. Charge time by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

    So I'd have to recharge this thing, at best, every 3 hours? Nuts to that.

    --
    Dyolf Knip
    1. Re:Charge time by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Hey Dyolf, how about you RTFA next time? The writeup is wrong; is supports 80 hours of standby.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:Charge time by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Shit, I'm really on the ball today, aren't I? The Seiko is 80 hours, the Wristomo is indeed 200 minutes and therefore nearly useless.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  20. Not actually cellular by 3liter914-6 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In fact the phone is a PHS (Personal Handyphone System), and while in many ways it is similar to cellular technology, it is different in a lot of ways. It has pretty abysmal range, requiring a bunch of transceivers in a relatively small geographic area to get signal. It also cannot hand off to other cells, so kind of limits your ability to use it in a car, or on a train, etc. Still, a pretty neat device. They demonstrated it on the news last night, 2 girls talking to each other. One wearing the phone speaking at her wrist, the other using the phone unfolded as a handset. Reportedly a ring-type is also in development.

    1. Re:Not actually cellular by Deth_Master · · Score: 1

      It looks pretty cool, but I know that I hit my watch on stuff as I'm walking, working on computers, etc. So how durable is it? Will it ignite my gas as I'm filling my gas tank? What about static discharge? As I'm working on my computer to upgrade to the latest ram that just came out, will it fry the whole thing? Will I get wrist cancer? What if I'm writing an important paper and the vibrate feature goes off, utterly destroying the precious document?
      But seriously, I don't think this will be as useful as it seems like it would be. I would rather have a nifty cell phone that can talk to my computer and get phone numbers and stuff. I like toys that do all sorts of stuff (not necesarily the internet). I mean like it can do more than just be a phone and read the internet. On my Handspring I have the reference for PHP on it, some games and a universal remote program. On a similar note, I don't really want to surf the net from my phone. Why on earth would you want to wait for slashdot to load on the phone. The cost of having the 'net on your phone just doesn't seem worth the wait or the "convience."
      I suppose it would be neet to show to people, but only for a while. For $50+ a month it's not worth it to me.

      --
      find ~your -name '*base* | xargs chown :us
    2. Re:Not actually cellular by BBPing · · Score: 0

      What if I'm writing an important paper and the vibrate feature goes off, utterly destroying the precious document?

      If you are writing a paper with an Etch-a-sketch, you deserve what you get.

  21. Japanese Press Release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    OK, now we know how to say "and it's waterproof" in Japanese.

    Seriously, doesn't the world realize that the internet should all be in English? And when it's noon in New York, it should be noon everywhere.

    I thought we were moving TOWARD standards.

    (ok, moderators, it was a joke...)

  22. Not a very good name for a Transformer... by Pop+n'+Fresh · · Score: 1

    The Wristomo Wrist Phone unique design lets users transform it into a handset.

    Uhh, Wristomo? What kind of name is that for a Decepticon? I am not afraid. Now Soundwave, that was a cool transforming audio device.

    --
    *This page intentionally left pointless*
    1. Re:Not a very good name for a Transformer... by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      And I Quote from Stix...
      "Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
      Mata ah-oo hima de
      Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
      Himitsu wo shiri tai

      You're wondering who I am-machine or mannequin
      With parts made in Japan, I am the modern man"


      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  23. Not Waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not doubly waterproof. It's not even waterproof. It's water resistant. There is a limit to it's resistance as indicated by n X Atm. or n X Meters of pressure it can with withstand. To be waterproof would imply that no amount of water pressure could enter the watch.

    1. Re:Not Waterproof by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > To be waterproof would imply that no amount of water pressure could enter the watch.

      Then I would contend that no watch is waterproof, since I doubt they would be too useful after being in the depths of the ocean. I doubt it is "no amount" just some threshhold that will very rarely be reached. Not that this has any bearing on the conversation...

  24. Nice but... by dfn5 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll wait until I can get a cell phone in a shoe. And I don't want one of those fancy touch tone phones either. Rotary all the way!

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Nice but... by farmerj · · Score: 1

      ..and you could use a big plastic bubble to set up your VPN:)

      Analog all the way, eh?

      --
      Independence? That's middle-class blasphemy. We are all dependent on one another, every soul of us on earth. G.B Shaw
    2. Re:Nice but... by Flamesplash · · Score: 1, Funny

      WHAT!?

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    3. Re:Nice but... by BobTheJanitor · · Score: 1

      It's a reference to the old spy spoof show, Get Smart. Secret Agent Max Smart (Agent 86) had a phone in his shoe. Whenever he and the Chief needed to speak privately, they had to use the Cone of Silence, which was essentially a big semisphere that droped down from the ceiling. Thus, everything in the show was analog.

    4. Re:Nice but... by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      I don't think he was asking a question. I think he was acting like Max inside the dome. ;)

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  25. But the real question is... by eldimo · · Score: 0

    Is it waterproof???

    1. Re:But the real question is... by JollyTX · · Score: 1

      Good news - I think it is! No water in this baby, no siree.

      --
      Can you hear me, Major Tom? I'm not the man they think I am at home...
  26. Yeah, but... by greygent · · Score: 1

    is it waterproof?

  27. Wristomo by 3liter914-6 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just as another note, Wristomo is composed of the words "Wrist" (naturally) and "Tomo"dachi meaning friend. So it's your wrist friend....how cute.

    1. Re:Wristomo by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Uhhh...did anyone in Japan check up on the conotations of having a "Wrist friend" at all?

      I would assume they did not, and don't care much.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  28. 200min... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's 200 Jikan that means 200 hours long and not 200 min. long of course!

    Hontou ni.

    Julien

  29. Ah, I remember ... by Xouba · · Score: 1

    Those times when cell phones were useful, and not only trendy gadgets.

    Hmmm.

    Ok, I lied. Mod me down.

    1. Re:Ah, I remember ... by thynk · · Score: 1

      I remember when coverage and quality of signal used to be the deciding factor in a cell phone. Why is it now that the cooler the phones a company offers (T-Mobile) the worse the coverage and quality? Oh, wait - never mind, that's one a given.

      I'd be excited to get one of these, but...

      1. The thought of recharging my watch really doesn't sit well.

      2. It seems to be missing a calculator, GPS and remote - the basic functions ANY good geek watch should have.

      5. (3 sir, oh... 3). These don't have service in the states.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  30. Mod parent as funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the first Dick Tracy joke. Give him a break!

  31. Hmmm... by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    Talk-time of 120min, with a stand-by of only 200?
    The relation seems strange, and a stand-by of 200 is not worth much to me.

    And it's waterproof! Surely there's something fishy going on...

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  32. will it be only for Japan? by Sarin · · Score: 1

    Sice NTT DoCoMo announced it, does it mean it will only work on the Japanese phonesystem? Or will there be a version that is compatible with the GSM systems used in other parts of the world?

  33. Not so tiny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the dimensions is 171.5mm! If that's not a typo, this thing should be called the wristomoth.

  34. Great... by Mabidex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope we actually see this one.

    Samsung released showed their wrist phone in 1999, and never released it.

    2-3 others have had a try on the same concept but never have released them.

    The reason I would buy one immediatly, (I actually was looking for the smallest cell phone I could find last night...) is because sometimes, all I want is a cellphone that is completely unobtrusive, and can't be lost easily. During the day, I wear a cellphone with everything under the sun in it (camera, email, IM, calendar, etc) , and it feels like a brick. But at night, or going out.... I hate the @#%@%$

    What is the smallest cellphone you guys have seen, that is actually being sold????

    Thanks

    Mabidex

  35. Re:My ex-boyfriend wrote about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately, due to your inability to read and understand words (you can read them, just not get a general idea of what they are about) you not only couldnt understand the thesis; you also did not understand the article.

  36. 171.5x40.4x18.5mm by elbanevretep · · Score: 1

    Hmm, 17x4cm makes a somewhat LARGE wristwatch.

    1. Re:171.5x40.4x18.5mm by duguk · · Score: 0

      If you look at the picture on http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/new/contents/03/whatnew 0326.html, its really not that big! In fact, its not that big at all really! I want one!

      Monkey...

    2. Re:171.5x40.4x18.5mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* There goes the ability to stick my hand down my pants a la Al Bundy... I swear, I break more wristwatches that way...

  37. Nice but.. by John_Renne · · Score: 1

    Does it sync my mail, calender etc. I'ld really hate not being able to check that while swimming ;-)

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
    1. Re:Nice but.. by Keighvin · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "sink"?

      --
      Any spoon would be too big.
  38. Viruses by Fembot · · Score: 1

    Does it support viruses too? Or will they only work in later versions?

  39. The BBC... by gricholson75 · · Score: 0

    The BBC would like to apologize for the repetition in this post.

    The BBC would like to apologize for the repetition in this post.

  40. Korea and Japan? by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

    Why is it that both these debut outside the US?
    One is in Japan the other in Korea
    t68i came out in Asia and Europe.
    Is US not gadget crazy enough? Or is it the service provider monopolies in US affetcting manufacturers?

    --
    .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    1. Re:Korea and Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the US is considered a 3rd world country in cellphone technology and development...primarily because lack of interoperability between the different service providers

    2. Re:Korea and Japan? by Swift(void) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The US may be gadget crazy, but Japan and Korea are even crazier. They could probably sell more of these in a single day in Japan than they could in a month in the US.

    3. Re:Korea and Japan? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The US now specialises in renaming junk food and having marines shoot each other in Iraq.

      Japan took over the gadgets LOOOOOOOOOONG ago. All the US has to show for itself in that department recently is the iPod (wich is, admitedly, freakin' kewl).

      Other areas in wich the US has taken the lead are obesity, childish behaviour of elected official (freedom toast? For real???), and unmanned air vehicles (wich are gadgets of a sort, I guess).

      See, its all about priorities: Japan has gadgets and hummanois robots, the Us has weapons and patriotic junk food for its obese patriots!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Korea and Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to move to Tokyo.

  41. I need a phone without a UI by javatips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just can't wait for someone to release a GSM phone that has no (or a minimal - keypad and one-line LCD) User Interface.

    A cell that has bluetooth and that is very small. I don't need a large screen, my Palm Tungtsen T already has one. I don't need to play games on the phone, My Palm TT does it better. I just need a phone that can initiate the calls.

    A phone like that would not cost a lot and battery life would probably be a lot better that current phone.

    My ideal setup would be:
    - A UI-less bluetooth phone,
    - A Palm TT or any other small Bluetooth PDA,
    - A Bluetooth headset.

    1. Re:I need a phone without a UI by EisPick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone at DaimlerChrysler obviously is thinking about the same sort of future:

      http://www.mopar.com/chrysler/Uprod.html.

    2. Re:I need a phone without a UI by AnnaBlack · · Score: 1

      Wait no longer. It is here. Or more specifically, here in an article in The Register. Of course, GSM standards means that most of the rest of the world gets it before the USA :) Anna

    3. Re:I need a phone without a UI by rasteri · · Score: 1

      Well, the nokia cardphone series (PCMCIA GSM card with a little antenna) does MOST of what you describe. It just doesn't have the bluetooth.

      Another alternative is something like the Nokia 6310i. Yes, it has a UI, but it's small(ish), has bluetooth, and it lasts me more than a week on about 2 hours of charge time (li-polymer battery).

    4. Re:I need a phone without a UI by thrilliams · · Score: 1

      So have the folks at IXI mobile. Their IXI-Connect product takes this idea a step further.

    5. Re:I need a phone without a UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SonyEricson T68i

      I have a friend who has the Tungsten TT, the T68i, and the Jabra Bluetooth headset.

      It all works together! You can dial from the Tungsten have it connect and transfer to the heaset without ever touching the phone.

      He calls it his VPN for very personal network.

      Andrew

  42. But wait ... there's more! by telstar · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It's water-proof! Call now and we'll throw in an extra coat of water-proofing. Be Dialing!

  43. I'm going to hold off by tlianza · · Score: 0

    There's no way I'm buying one of these things until they make them waterproof.

  44. Slashdotted by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

    The link seems to be slashdotted. Here's a link to another site with images of the unit. It's in Japanese, but the pictures speak for themselves.

    --
    Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  45. Tell me again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you need to syncrhonize the watch with Outlook? I'm not complaining about the fact that its MS Outlook, I'm wondering why you just can't check your e-mail on one, then check it on the other.

    Ooooooooooooh Riiiiiiiiiight. There are still a bunch of stupid people out there who use POP instead of IMAP.

    1. Re:Tell me again by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      I suspect the reason is contacts lists and not email syncing....

    2. Re:Tell me again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, IMAP is a great idea! Especially when your ISP goes down and then you can't even access your saved mail. Man, I just love saving off a message with important information and not being able to see it because my provider upgraded their servers the night before and now nothing works.

      Yes, that was sarcasm, and you never have that problem with POP3, since all the mail resides locally.

  46. Why bother by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Other than the "Dick Tracy" factor, I don't see the point of the watch-cell phone combo.

    The only way I see this as a valid product is bluetooth connectivity with a bluetooth earbud/mic combo. Now, if they figured out how to add all that and include the ear bud into the watch, I think it would be worth considering.

    Still, though, not as easy as picking up a phone and answering it.

    IMHO.

    1. Re:Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for the interface that was shown in the intro to the final fantasy movie released about a year ago. Holographic interface from a small wrist device... I think that's closer than we think too :) hopefully

  47. Waterproof? by ChrisJones · · Score: 1

    So it's definitely waterproof? ;)

    --
    Chris "Ng" Jones
    cmsj@tenshu.net
    www.tenshu.net
  48. Mod Him Back Up, You Cultural Illiterates! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    C'mon! Remember Dick Tracy? The ORIGINAL wristwatch (vid)phones?? Magnetic Hovercars?? Sam Ketcham?

    NO?!?

    How 'bout the later-model Beatty/Pacino/Madonna movie, does THAT ring any bells?

    ZD even led with a Tracy reference when it reported this same story

    Jeez, yet another reason for SlashDot to institute age filters; I guess it would be pointless for me to make a joke about "Opening Channel 'D'" ...

  49. Hmmm.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    I like the concept. However, the band doesn't look very sturdy. How much you want to bet the hinges on this thing won't hold up?

    I also wonder what the likelihood would be to make this thing be Kinetic, if its even possible.

    And how much is 50K yen in dollars anyway?

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  50. I hope they don't add a camera by stubaggs · · Score: 1

    because I know I would be tempted to make calls from the shower, just to tell people it is waterproof.

  51. official link by FlippyBoy · · Score: 1

    it wasnt posted in the article, and i havent seen it in any of the comments, so here is the official link for the watch.

  52. 200 minutes standby? by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something here or does that make it all but useless?

    1. Re:200 minutes standby? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      The writeup is wrong. It's got 80 hours of standby.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:200 minutes standby? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      My bad, you were right the first time. Yes, it'd be all but completely useless with 200 minutes.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  53. Huh? by archetypeone · · Score: 1

    113 grams! That's way too much for a watch!

  54. Phone that wraps around your wrist? So what? by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    Some of the earlier posters are getting at the problem, here. This phone is basically the same as any other mobile phone device, it just wraps around your wrist a little better. Waterproof? It had better be, since your wrist goes near a faucet much more often than a mobile phone normally would. I have a Sony radio that fits on an armband or on a belt clip. That seems like a much better form factor than the wrist.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  55. ok its waterproof... by guile*fr · · Score: 1

    but u failed to notice it doesnt actualy give the time.

  56. 200 minutes standby? by koi88 · · Score: 0

    Obviously, it should read: 200 HOURS of standby...

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  57. yes, but what we really want to know is... by prw404 · · Score: 1

    ...is it water proof?

    1. Re:yes, but what we really want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Man, this just gets funnier EVERY TIME I HEAR IT!
      Could someone else please point out this duplicity in the summary? One more time and I'll piss myself from laughter, and I really love pissing myself!

      TIA!

  58. Yep by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    At least someone got it. :)

    I used to love watching that show on Nick at Night, I'm glad they reaired it as it was originally way before my time.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  59. Something else strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The size of the thing is reported as

    171mm by 40 mm by 18 mm

    In other words

    About seven inches by two and a half by one
    (Very approx)

    That's a pretty large brick to strap to your wrist.

  60. Uhhhhhh by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Did something happen that requires everything to start in the USA? Gosh, maybe once in a while, something could start somewhere else.

    Ya think?

    Obviously not.

  61. Science fiction and technology by Pejorian · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that science fiction suggests some new technologies long, long before they are possible, but completely misses others.

    As people have mentioned, Dick Tracy had a wrist-phone, but none of the "golden era" (30's-60's) science fiction that I read ever predicted the cell phone as a commonplace, walking-down-the-street, standing-in-line-at-starbucks, chatting-with-your-friend devices that every student would have.

    Also, whatever happened to the videophone? We've had the technology for a while, but the SF authors got it wrong again, I guess. Nobody wants to be on the viewscreen while talking...

    Oh, and you can't blow your computer up by convincing it that it's illogical.

    --
    - Murphy's Corollary: - It is impossible to make things foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
    1. Re:Science fiction and technology by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1

      Oh, and you can't blow your computer up by convincing it that it's illogical.

      AI technology isn't advanced enough yet to do that. In 3-5 years, you will be able to blow up your computer just by speaking into a microphone and giving a voice command.

      --
      I am not Herbert.
  62. I'm waiting for for V. 2 by El_Smack · · Score: 1

    It will be so small (and waterproof) that it will be placed in your nose. Version 2's name?

    Nostromo.
    (Don't mod me down just because you don't get the reference.)

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:I'm waiting for for V. 2 by Shabazz · · Score: 1

      I get it. Good book. Bad reference. Joseph Conrad rocks.

  63. It has to be waterproof by dracol1ch · · Score: 1
    The pictures aren't great but from the looks of it this thing has absolutely no clasp. I can already see it snapping itself open and setting a direct course for the nearest and deepest puddle.

    Why is it that companies seem obsessed with trying to actually create technology that someone thought up years ago and most people have already decided was lame? I already get strange enough looks when I talk on my bluetooth headset. I imagine it would only take about 10 minutes for the padded bus to arive if a yanked my watch of my wrist in a public place and started talking to it.

    --
    Who moderates the meta-moderators?
  64. The /. Effect by Kelz · · Score: 1

    It seems the main link's server is going quite slow so here's another link b4 the site goes down. http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/342/C1560/

  65. Did he mention... by razablade · · Score: 1

    it's even water-proof!

    --
    The expression is "I could NOT care less." Think about it.
    1. Re:Did he mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, good thing you caught that error. No one else did! We have a comedy winner... Give this man the $10,000!

  66. Wait, 200 minutes standby? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    I mean, really, did I read that right? You charge your watch and it's good to take incoming calls for a little over three hours?

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  67. not sure if this was mentioned in the header by fleck_99_99 · · Score: 1

    But this watch is wicked waterproof.

    It's so waterproof that if you were to throw it into the Great Salt Lake, it would within seconds sit atop an enormous salt crystal pyramid in the middle of the Great Freshwater Donut.

    --
    seven two six five
    seven four six one seven
    two six four two e
  68. Would you believe.... by BobTheJanitor · · Score: 1

    I'm a little slow?

    1. Re:Would you believe.... by daeley · · Score: 1

      WHAT?!!

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  69. I use PHS by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    It rocks.
    I get sound quality indistinguishable from a land line, days of use on a charge and "pretty good" coverage, including just about everywhere I happen to go around Tokyo, including underground train stations and the top of Mt. Fuji.
    Plus, it's way cheaper.

    It has pretty abysmal range, requiring a bunch of transceivers in a relatively small geographic area to get signal.

    That pretty much describes Tokyo.

    For 95% of when I need it, it works.
    Cheers,
    Jim

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  70. Bulk by SuDZ · · Score: 1

    The look of it is kind of cool but I wonder if it would feel kind of bulky? I mean sometimes just a regular watch gets in the way of doing other things.So I am curious how this would go.

    SuDZ

  71. You missed his point... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    ... which is that -nothing- ever starts in the USA. All the cool stuff always gets started in Japan first and then maybe, if we're lucky, they'll give us a dumbed-down version of it later for much more money.

    This is the reason why places like Dynamism (http://www.dynamism.com/) exist.

    The question is, why? Am I stupid for thinking that if you release something tremendously cool for a decent price in the US that lots of people will buy it?

    --

    +++ATH0
  72. Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the author of Dick Tracy was ahead of his time...

  73. BUT, by brakk · · Score: 1

    Is is waterproof?

  74. That should be... by BJH · · Score: 1

    ...200 *hours*.

    1. Re:That should be... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Aaah, I had a feeling it might be something like that, but the site was slow as hell and my Japanese isn't that great in any case, so I had to trust the writeup.

      I'll know better than to trust /. next time...

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  75. Re:april 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New killer. It's pronounced "New Killer"

  76. Man, if only it was waterproof! by baudbarf · · Score: 1

    There's only one thing that keeps me from buying one - I don't think they're waterproof.

    --
    You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
    1. Re:Man, if only it was waterproof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the eleven other people posting similar comments give you the idea for this joke, or did you come up with this hilarious gem all by yourself? You, sir, are the King of Comedy!

    2. Re:Man, if only it was waterproof! by baudbarf · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's 100% baudbarf! I never read comments, I just post. And thank you for the compliment!

      --
      You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
  77. Soon after it's release... by baudbarf · · Score: 1

    ...doctors began seeing a baffling increase in cases of "wrist cancer"

    --
    You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
  78. +5 Redundant by gykh · · Score: 1

    It IS!

  79. what a disappointing announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the photos of scantily-clad hot Japanese chicks wearing these things?

  80. Dick Tracy by bluyonder · · Score: 1

    When they add a camera we will finally have the elusive Dick Tracy wrist phone. These are great times indeed.

  81. A new specialty field for oncologists... by ceije · · Score: 1

    Yaay, wrist cancer.

  82. Re:Wristomo - only one t by jrumney · · Score: 1

    wrist - omo omo(i) [adj] - heavy; massive; I imagine this thing is going to weigh a bit more than your average wristwatch if it has a usable battery life. omo [n] - face As in face of a watch. omo [adj-na;n] - chief; main; principal; important; Until everyone has one, this is going to be the most important thing on your wrist.

  83. The reason this will fail is.... by woobieman29 · · Score: 1

    because the only people that will buy it are the ones that have absolutely no concern that they look like a BIG FREAKIN' DORK with a gigantic Go-Bot attacking their arm. Seriously, there is a percentage of dateless geeks that will wear this thing and be okay with it, but for an item like this to sell it *MUST* be the same size as a conventional wristwatch. Maybe the one that Fossil is working on will be better, but this Wristomo will only sell to Slashdotters that never leave the house.

    --
    \/\/oobie
  84. Waterproof? That's the real breakthrough... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    If this thing is really waterproof, or even highly water resistant, that would be a first, AFAIK. I've been looking for a waterproof phone for years, and I'm awfully surprised no one has offered it.

    I think of all those surfers in southern CA who would love to be able to call home and ask when dinner will be ready. Sony sports phone anyone? Talk about untapped potential...

    No one but a fashion fiend needs a wrist phone, but a waterproof Star-tac that fits in a pocket would be a boon to many.

    Seriously, many of us who work outside are in dire need of waterproof phones. Whether it's doing a wet job or getting caught in the rain, keeping a cell phone dry is a real pain. Most of them die at the first drop of water.

  85. There's a reason I don't have a watch like this... by multiplexo · · Score: 1

    It has something to do with my desire to mate with members of the opposite sex.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  86. You have no point by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    which is that -nothing- ever starts in the USA

    Cell phones started in the USA.

    The Internet started in the USA.

    PDAs started in the USA.

    Flight started in the USA.

    Telephones started in the USA.

    You can find more examples if you, too, think for a spell. It's not hard.

  87. 3 Hours??!! by Myko · · Score: 1

    WOW, you get just over 3 hours of standby time!! I hope their site is wrong when they say "200 min. standby"

  88. Oh, come on. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    You know what I meant, in the context of the article. Gimme a break, I was at work and exhausted. :p

    Fine, we create v1.0 of something, but every single time, Japan grabs the idea, pumps it full of steroids, and we are stuck with generation 1 technology for years.

    Cell phones? PDAs? Laptops? With anything small and electronic, Japan beats the crap out of us in implementation.

    --

    +++ATH0
  89. Just a little off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, OK.
    We were all worried about having only 200 minutes for Internet access, but now we know the translator was Jikan off.

  90. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the
    Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun.
    Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an
    utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life
    forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches
    are a pretty neat idea ...
    -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...