Slashdot Mirror


Last-Mile Fiber Optic

Johnny Mnemonic writes "The newsletter "The Town Paper" tracks the development of "traditional" new developments--developments with integrated shopping, parks, and that are pedestrian friendly. Their recent issue has an article that describes a new community in Issaquah WA that has, among it's interesting features: a wired LAN in every home, free community Intranet, and a choice for a fiber optic connection. It is probably no coincidence that Microsoft is planning on building 3 million square feet of office space there. How much is a pre-wired house worth to you? What will this do for community building?"

224 comments

  1. well poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear you are a long cable arent ya?

  2. Oh Joy by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 1

    While it would be cool to have fiber to every house, I hope that free Intranet(cough, taxes) has alot of good porn and mp3's. I doubt that the CO is going to have a few OC12's, so what good all that speed for the next ??? years(besides 1MS ping neighbourhood deathmatches)?

    1. Re:Oh Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has alot of good porn and mp3's

      Yeah! Instead of getting "girl-next-door"-type porn, you can actually get porn of the girl next door!

    2. Re:Oh Joy by knowledgepeacewi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >besides 1MS ping neighbourhood deathmatches? You need internet speed for anything else?

    3. Re:Oh Joy by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone decides to run a DirectConnect server, then it'll be fantastic. You'll all be downloading at 10 mb/s without hitting that "intarweb" bottleneck.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    4. Re:Oh Joy by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      (cough, taxes)

      (cough. cheaper than private enterprise broadband fiber... wait--there is no private fiber)

      (cough. Public internet access is cheaper by far than privately rolled out broadband)

    5. Re:Oh Joy by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      {cough. Communist.)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    6. Re:Oh Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the Reds! Pinko bastards!

      Oh wait, this is the 00's...

      Get the Terrorists! Islamic bastards!

    7. Re:Oh Joy by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Beware of the porn collections of bi-curious girls. They tend to throw in sausage orgies "accidently mislabeled" just to mess with your head. huh-huh, I said head.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    8. Re:Oh Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truely words to live by. -irc.goatse.cx troll who just posted something in the bsd section thats going to get me modded -3, Pro Linux

    9. Re:Oh Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      {cough. Communist.)
      Mismatched parantheses.

      Posted anonymously due to the sheer lack of value of this message...

  3. mmm fiber optics by Anonymous+Butthead · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As long as no fuundimental religion is included, i'm all for a fiber connection that's free of charge, where can I sign up?

    --
    Hey, this is my sig, if you don't like it, STOP READING MY POSTS!
  4. Good thinking by cubal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a pretty good plan--the "last mile" has always been the slow point in internet connections.

    This will also do wonders for the local economy; having built-in fiber will be a massive attraction to tech businesses. I daresay we'll be seeing a lot more of this sort of thing from now on.

    1. Re:Good thinking by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem with having incredibly fast last mile is that you need incredibly, incredibly fast upstream connectivity. For a stub system (i.e. a system which won't allow transit across itself,) the usual figures quoted are 16:1 contention; that is, sum(CPE bandwidth)/16.

      For a transit system (a system which provides connectivity between other systems/networks,) peering bandwidth should not exceed intra-system bandwidth, but also needs to be great enough that systems who use you as a transit network actually do wind up getting the fastest path, as BGP has no concept of 'speed' as a metric.

      Given that this idea is proposing to deploy fibre at (i would assume) at least 10Mb to the home, the upstream bandwidth will almost certainly need to be in the gigabits for this to be useful. Transit infrastructure will likely also need to be upgraded if too many smaller ISPs start rolling this out.

      I don't think the networking infrastructure we have necessarily has the capacity right now. Perhaps when DWDM becomes more commonplace, with each run of Single mode carrying 100s of gigabits, but for now I think it's really only a pipe dream.

      Another idea worth considering is the 'script kiddie terrorist' argument. If you give uncapped 10Mb access to every script kiddie on your block, you'll need to make sure that everything else scales proportionally, or script kiddie targets will suffer an exponentially worse fate.

    2. Re:Good thinking by madfgurtbn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with having incredibly fast last mile is that you need incredibly, incredibly fast upstream connectivity

      Uh, yeah, isn't that the point?

      Not to be glib, but the network doens't grow symmetrically. There are always going to be bottlenecks, but there are always going to be improvements. When you build a new apartment complex, it makes sense to assume that the permanent network infrastructure in the building should, where economically feasible, be overbuilt as much as possible.

      It will be a while, if ever, before they can use all of their bandwidth, but when the time comes they are ready, eh.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    3. Re:Good thinking by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you build a new apartment complex, it makes sense to design in proper conduit channels so whatever is needed in the future can be easily pulled into each unit. That does not necessarily translate into pulling whatever expensive cabling happens to be 'bleeding edge' at the time.

    4. Re:Good thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to say software patents, of course, not IP.

    5. Re:Good thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The problem with having incredibly fast last mile is that you need incredibly, incredibly fast upstream connectivity.

      The solution could be to keep people from going outside, giving them as many local services as possible. In Milan, Rome and other Italian large cities and surroundings last mile fibre (10 Mbps) is available from an ISP called Fastweb. I have it at home paying about 60 Euros per month, unlimited traffic. The Internet bandwidth is about 2 Mbps on average, but I usually work/play inside the Fastweb network. That's a large Intranet with private IPs and lots of internal services, even managed by other customers who put on-line their systems as internal servers for the community, something like old BBSes. There's also a large OPENNAP community sharing almost anything.

      The "script kiddies problem" someone else pointed out does exist, indeed. I'm also the network manager of my company and we experienced at least one mail bombing episode from Fastweb. We had problems dealing with it, given that the attacker was behind NAT and he/she had so much bandwidth.

    6. Re:Good thinking by haroldhunt · · Score: 1

      Given that this idea is proposing to deploy fibre at (i would assume) at least 10Mb to the home, the upstream bandwidth will almost certainly need to be in the gigabits for this to be useful.



      No, no it won't. Michigan State University has 40,000 students, with probably half living in dorms, thousands of workers, hosts a debian mirror (ftp.egr.msu.edu), you get the point... we are capped at 1 Gbps upstream and no one complains. Where are you getting your numbers from?

    7. Re:Good thinking by accountant · · Score: 1

      I have a 10Mbps fibre line in my living room (it's been available for most my city - Milan -for a year or more) yes it really is a bit of waste. I get mostly 2.5Mbps for long downloads if that. Rarely I get 2 or three times that.

  5. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not only will I be able to hear my neighbors through the walls; this means increased fps on the hidden X-10 camera!

    1. Re:Imagine... by Talez · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do I forsee this domino effect of people all jerking off to each other using hidden X-10 cams.

      It'd be like some virtual circle jerk *cringe*

    2. Re:Imagine... by BJH · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'd be like some virtual circle jerk

      That pretty much describes most of the Internet right now anyway...

    3. Re:Imagine... by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Right. The one that's broadcasting from that webserver you also hid there.

  6. Interesting... by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always wondered why urban comunities didn't have all the wiring and fiber available to the residents. Large apartment buildings next to eachother would probably find it cheaper to have one large connection into the complexes and hire a network technican, than to have separate service providers (DSL, cable, etc) for each resident..

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:Interesting... by neurostar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IIRC there was an article about this in one of the linux magazines a couple years ago. It discussed an apartment building that got a single DSL line for the whole building. The guy set up a linux server or two for gateway/email servers and wired most of the aparments with ethernet cable. The cost of the dsl was split between the people who opted in on it.

      Unfortunately, I couldn't find a link to an online version of the article.

      neurostar
    2. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always wondered why urban comunities didn't have all the wiring and fiber available to the residents

      1. Retrofitting the buildings is expensive - it is not just a matter of running fiber to buildings -- ethernet jacks need to be put into rooms in apartments and cabling needs to be arranged. Who will manage the wire closet, etc.

      2. Not everyone wants/uses the service, so landlords are not necessarily going to spring for the cost

      3. Residential services are not where the money is

      Large apartment buildings next to eachother would probably find it cheaper to have one large connection into the complexes and hire a network technican

      You don't know many apartment operators, obviously. Even the large companies (mostly REITs) are extraordinarily conservative operators who do not change their ways of doing business easily. Especially post-bubble, most are likely to look at other amenities first, such as security, fitness centers, etc. Putting in technology infrastructure, which will likely involve additional costs, is not going to be an easy sell.

      I think some bigger aparment REITs may have been doing deals with some of the CLECs in the 90's, but I just don't see a tremendous desire by internet companies to chase the consumer in this manner. They just don't pay enough, and fiber infrastructure isn't exactly cheap.

      I can see this model working in some local environments, but as a business model, I can say pretty comfortably that there just is not much money there to be chased when you are talking about mega bandwidth to residences. Some people would pay big bucks, but most folks would say fuck it and go with the ILEC's $45 DSL or the cable company's $30 plan. Nobody will make money (today) selling fiber connections for $30 or selling $300 fiber connections to residences.

      Remember -- it's all about the "Profit!!"

      GF.

    3. Re:Interesting... by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I used to live in a large student co-op and this was something pretty much every house (as far as I know) did. At some point, our ISP went bankrupt and whoever bought it at that point decided not to continue their DSL services. As a "temporary" solution we ended up on a standard SBC residential DSL line. Divided 37 or so ways it was quite cheap, but there were some issues:

      - when somebody switched on Kazaa, everyone's connection came almost to a standstill
      - we had to wire the house ourselves to make it cost efficient
      - somebody had to maintain everything

      To me it seems like the biggest problem in an apartment complex or neighborhood would be the last issue. Who maintains it? For us, it was essentially somebody's job to tend to it (just like it was somebody's job to wash dishes on Sunday morning). Anybody know how this happens in these cases we're talking about? Is there a benevolent net admin (dictator) or do people pay a fee to some 3rd party?

    4. Re:Interesting... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I think what made it cost effective in this particular instance was the deal with MSFT for the office space--I can certainly imagine that MSFT either made it a condition of their locating there, or chose to locate there because of the geek-friendliness of the residences. I would certainly be surprised if less that 25% of the homes went to MSFT employees just due to promimity to their work--so they demanded a MSFT-employee-friendly infrastructure.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    5. Re:Interesting... by BJH · · Score: 1

      In Japan, almost all large apartment blocks being built these days have either FTTH or CATV Internet connectivity as standard. You'd be surprised what can happen when enough people ask for it. Your attitude is self-defeating.

    6. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Japan, almost all large apartment blocks being built these days have either FTTH or CATV Internet connectivity as standard. You'd be surprised what can happen when enough people ask for it. Your attitude is self-defeating.

      One: Japan is not the United States. What works there may or may not work here. First, the Japanese have density of population that is incomprehensible to the average American. This makes costs much lower per home passed, and it makes FTTH feasible. There are not too many "average" Japanese who live in sprawling subdivisions. Politics of development aside, the simple fact is that their living arrangements are comepletly different, and it is an apples to oranges comparison.

      Two: The views in my prior post are the general consensus in the real estate and CLEC world. I'm not sure what you mean by the "Your attitude is self-defeating" comment. If there's money to be made, I'm more than happy to be the onne to make it.

      On the other hand, I do not exactly see spending thousands of dollars to pass homes with fiber in the hopes of making maybe $25-30 gross per month as being a path to riches. YMMV. Nobody is stopping you from trying to do it with your money, pal.

      GF.

    7. Re:Interesting... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Eh? Who was talking about subdivisions? Your earlier post was about apartment buildings, as was mine. Now who's comparing apples to oranges?

    8. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      when somebody switched on Kazaa, everyone's connection came almost to a standstill

      Why didn't you use a bandwidth shaper then?

    9. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eh? Who was talking about subdivisions? Your earlier post was about apartment buildings, as was mine. Now who's comparing apples to oranges?

      Even in apartments, the densities are dramatically lower in the US. Unless you in hardcore center-city areas, you do not see US apartments that even remotely resemble Japanese apartments. An average apartment offered by residential REIT, you generally see nothing less than 1000 sq. ft. for a one bedroom plus grounds. Nothing even remotely comparable exists in Japan, and certainly not in any areas where FTTH may exist.

      The fact is that population densities in Japan are much, much, much greater than all but a handful of areas in the US.

      FTTH will not work in the US just because it works in Japan. Demographically and culturally, the two countries are tremendously different. The value proposition has to be there on both sides -- consumer demand and investors' return. Without both of those componenents being in place, it is not going to happen. I don't see both of those pieces being in place yet.

      GF.

    10. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually was a company a couple of years ago that did this called Darwin Networks. They ran a pretty good service until they went bankrupt. Really nice as my apartment had a jack in each room. Verizon has now taken over the service but I migrated to DSL before Verizon showed up.

    11. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually was a company a couple of years ago that did this called Darwin Networks. They ran a pretty good service until they went bankrupt.

      Natural selection at work, I guess.

      GF.

    12. Re:Interesting... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Nothing even remotely comparable exists in Japan, and certainly not in any areas where FTTH may exist.

      And how, perchance, would you know? To put it bluntly...

    13. Re:Interesting... by Madwand · · Score: 1

      Some urban communities do have fibre properly run around them, and properly run, e.g. Stockholm, Sweden.

      However, others are completely hosed, e.g. Palo Alto, California. The fibre's been there for ages, and they're still not using it properly.

      The trouble is that telephone companies hate competition, and any attempt to actually compete with them will result in them throwing whatever roadblocks they can into the way.

    14. Re:Interesting... by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why didn't you use a bandwidth shaper then?

      We were running some sort of consumer-grade Linksys home router dealie, which didn't support such fancy things. People were encouraged to do file trading during non-peak hours. When that strategy failed, I would block ports, but only when things got really out of hand. Looking back now, it could have been an interesting project replacing it with some sort of linux box. Probably would have been more stable too.

    15. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      And how, perchance, would you know? To put it bluntly...

      1. SWAG
      2. I'm making it up

      GF.

    16. Re:Interesting... by BJH · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Interesting... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Wow, a single DSL connection for a whole building. I can hear people pounding the wall for bandwidth already...

      'Damn Randy down in #103 must be streaming PORN again....'

    18. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      1. Scientific Wild Ass Guess

      Seriously, Japan has a seriously higher population density than the US. The US has a popululation density of 89 per square mile. Japan has a density of 869 per square mile. Japan has about 126,000,000 people in a country the size of CA. The US has about 270,000,000 people.
      http://www.mrdowling.com/800density.html
      Even if you throw out everything between the Sierras and the Mississippi, and keep the population from the excluded area, the US has a significantly lower population density. Imagine stuffing everyone in the US in an area the size of OR, WA, and CA and you'd get the idea of what Japan is like.

      I am willing to speculate that this population density makes a big difference in determining what technologies are feasible. I assumed that Japan's population density was something like common knowledge. My bad.

      GF.

    19. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been to Japan?

    20. Re:Interesting... by aquarian · · Score: 1

      You don't know many apartment operators, obviously. Even the large companies (mostly REITs) are extraordinarily conservative operators who do not change their ways of doing business easily. Especially post-bubble, most are likely to look at other amenities first, such as security, fitness centers, etc. Putting in technology infrastructure, which will likely involve additional costs, is not going to be an easy sell.

      I do know apartment operators, and unfortunately you are correct. It doesn't help that property management is often the business of the ne'er do well son in law, the slacker grandchild, or other idiot who either couldn't or wouldn't do anything else. No MIT grads, in other words...

    21. Re:Interesting... by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      Bell Canada did this 5-6 years ago. If I remember the specs, each building was connected up to a full OC3, with a router somewhere in the building, and each apartment was hooked up via ethernet (and each apt having it's own static IP address to boot). It never left the testing phase however (it was in full blown production for those apartment buildings, but it never was released to market). This is just an assumption, but DSL was just around the corner at the time, so they probably assumed that DSL was a cheaper alternative.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    22. Re:Interesting... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Well... I've lived there for the last 13 years, so I guess you could say so.

    23. Re:Interesting... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Er... see my other comment.

    24. Re:Interesting... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      I do know apartment operators, and unfortunately you are correct. It doesn't help that property management is often the business of the ne'er do well son in law, the slacker grandchild, or other idiot who either couldn't or wouldn't do anything else. No MIT grads, in other words...

      No offense, but the apartment operators I'm referencing are the ones who own 50 thousand or more units -- such as United Dominion Realty Trust (UDR), Archstone (ASN), Equity Residential (EQR), Town and Country (TCT), Aimco (AIV), etc. These are, realistically, the only ones who will bring FTTH to a mass market in the rental world. Other players would be needed for single-family stuff, such as Lennar.

      Little one-off deals might work for smaller multifamily and single family developers, as I mentioned, but the big boys need to make FTTH happen for it to become commonplace. And they are extremely conservative in terms of offering new services and changing their ways of doing business. By conservative, I mean that they won't do it just because people on /. think it's neat. It has to make money for them. Notably, apartment operators were not going bankrupt during the last five years. They learned a lot in the mid/late Eighties.

      FWIW, I know a number of smaller operators (200 units or less). I would classify none of them as ne'er do wells or slackers. Gross generalizations (except when I make them, such as right now) generally are wrong. ;P

      GF.

    25. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what is the average square footage of a one bedroom apartment? Both African and European?

    26. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... see my other comment [slashdot.org].

      Fine. My original point was that FTTH will not work in the US simply because it has worked in Japan. One of my issues is that Japan's densities are far higher than the US. Both single family and multifamily units are far smaller and more closely packed in Japan. Where is my assertion on that count wrong, and when did /. become a fricking footnote-a-thon?

      GF.

    27. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An average apartment offered by residential REIT, you generally see nothing less than 1000 sq. ft. for a one bedroom plus grounds. Nothing even remotely comparable exists in Japan, and certainly not in any areas where FTTH may exist.

      What is the rental for a garden-style two bedroom, 1000 square foot B apartment in Tokyo in USD? In Northern VA, it'll run about $1400. Can you even find a garden style 2 BR that is 1000 sf? If you can, I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that it won't fetch anything like $1400.

      GF.

    28. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $US195K? Sounds pretty good to me. I'd have to pay more than that for a two-bedroom house on a postage-stamp's worth of land over an hour from central Tokyo. My brother-in-law bought a 1500 sq. foot plot of land in western Tokyo for about $800K. The house cost him another $350K.

      Google results 1-10 of about 65,400,000 for b. Search took 0.04 seconds.


      Hm. Could it be that densities are far higher in Japan than in the US? Jackass.

      GF.

    29. Re:Interesting... by Scott+Hale · · Score: 1

      One of my friends lives in an apartment complex that is networked, and they share a DSL connection. The downloads are pretty good (~30-50KB/s, Im on a modem so its good for me) but there's one problem: NAT. Your average surfer/email reader won't care about this, but its a royal pain when you feel the need to play games or use eDonkey. Id rather pay the extra $30 for my own connection and IP address.

    30. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No MIT grads, in other words...

      I'm sorry... so is that supposed to be a good thing, or a bad thing?

    31. Re:Interesting... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Look at offices!

      Do you see people in the same building pooling internet connections as the norm? While saving money is nice, there is a bigger desire to maintain accountability. Having your in-house maintenance guy troubleshooting the network isn't an efficient use of resources.

      Any potential savings go away when someone needs a service that isn't currently on the network, so they contract their own connection.

      The same problem has existed for years with other building-level infrastructure... phone switches, UPS systems, security, even generators (where it not for physical size constraints). Everybody wants their own.

    32. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, try this Vancouver neighbourhood. It is not too dense, big buildings spread out with parks and roads in between, fibre was built in from the start more than ten years ago, to break the cabletv monopoly. the cable co. went berserk.

      http://www.concordpacific.com/inourhomes/in_our_ ho mes.html

      as for japan, not only do we have 100mbps fibre from the electric co. we can buy it from NTT also, or I can get 12, 8, 1.5mbps ADSL from NTT or from yahoo, or numerous resellers etc. NTT is selling fibre for \1,300 right now on a campaign. do the math.

  7. Hmm... by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 0, Troll

    If the Microsoft involvement means MSN has to be my ISP, I'd pass.

    1. Re:Hmm... by mAineAc · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere, I can't find the damn link right now, that MSN was thinking of giving up the ISP reigns and going with just producing it software. It will be pretty much offering it as the default software for broadband and what not but dial-up will be history.

    2. Re:Hmm... by ArkiMage · · Score: 1

      Charter cable has some kind of deal with Microsoft making MSN our "ISP". My Linksys router gets a standard DHCP'ed IP address and my Linux machine connects to the net through it just fine. Only difference I can see is the Charter logo on the MSN web site at http://charter.msn.com This ISP "deal" means nothing of substance. Of course locally there used to be FAQs and local support info at http://www.chartertn.net which now just redirects to MSN. Geez...

  8. Oh boy, and look at the beautiful duck pond! by rdewald · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since I have wired every dwelling I have occupied with cat5 and a patch panel since 1986, this doesn't seem so much forward looking to me as finally catching up. I wonder how the community Intranet will be administered, if it is anything like the "community parks" these developments usually include to sell the units, then chances are it is going to be left to virtually grow over with weeds (unpatched servers, slow hubs/switches) after the units have been purchased. Of course, since Microsoft is moving in, it might become yet another way to promote MSN.

    Of course, it seems more cost-effective to just blanket the area with Wi-Fi...

    --
    The best way to do is to be.
  9. New? Not really... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a very common thing in Washington, especially in Issaquah. I'm not sure if I've visted this location, but I went to one like it in the same area... they had a little courtyard type deal with a little cafe, a couple restaurants, a grocery store, and a video rental place. There is also complete excersize and sports facilites, a community garden, a large playground, etc. The tie-in with Microsoft only makes sense... nearly everyone that lives there is somehow involved with them.

    --
    sig.
  10. Not much by Apreche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A pre-wired house isn't worth much, to a geek like me. To someone else it's probably worth a lot.

    The reason? Well, being a geek I would want my wires in a very specific configuration just for me. I would be pissed off about having the jack in the wrong part of the wall. I wouldn't like having to modify my computing to match the house. I want the house to match the way I like to do things. Ideally I would have one room of the house with many computers in it and many cables. I would have an office with one computer in it, wired. Every other room in the house woul be accomodated by a single WAP.

    If it's expensive fiber or a configuration I have to adapt to, rather than one that adapts to me I wont like it.

    Non geek people would love it though, if they can get it to work.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Not much by phrogeeb · · Score: 1

      I would be pissed off about having the jack in the wrong part of the wall. I wouldn't like having to modify my computing to match the house. I want the house to match the way I like to do things. Ideally I would have one room of the house with many computers in it and many cables. I would have an office with one computer in it, wired. Every other room in the house woul be accomodated by a single WAP.


      You get pissed off about having a jack in the wrong part of the wall? Does that seem a little bit thumb-your-nose to anyone else? And one room with many computers and many cables? AND an office, with another computer? What are all of those cables for?

      --

      ------

      "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush, in Jan. 2000

    2. Re:Not much by drizuid · · Score: 1

      a room with many comps and many cables... why dont you put all your pop hardware and cabling into a closet... uhmm i think it's called a wiring closet.. I'm sure if they put fibre into a home, there will be a wiring closet, it wouldn't make sense without it

    3. Re:Not much by BJH · · Score: 1

      My hardware wouldn't FIT in a wiring closet.

    4. Re:Not much by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I would hope your primary firewall & router, along with your primary webserver, dns, pop, etc (even if you run them on separate boxes) and your primary switch, which connects to all the jacks you installed hroughout the house would fit in a closet.
      Store your secondary servers in your computer/server room.

      As a side note, noone mentioned anything about size. The wiring 'closet' you get built into your house could be large rnough for 4 7' racks that you cold walk around and still be a closet.

    5. Re:Not much by BJH · · Score: 1

      True. I generally associate the word 'closet' with something that can fit one standard rack, with anything larger a 'room'. My bad.

    6. Re:Not much by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      I know where he's coming from.

      In my "office" I have my workstation, my media server and internet servers. In the cupboard in the same room I have most of my networking equipment - routers/switches/cable modem/dsl modem - and two links downstairs to the rest of the house (one of them is redundant - overkill for a house?!)

      I also have a couple of switches downstairs for the likes of my parents' and brothers' computers, the PS2, and the home entertainment center. There is also an airport floating about for the laptop.

      I designed it in a specific way for my likings and no doubt any other geek would probably come to my house, rip everything up, and start again because it's not suitable.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    7. Re:Not much by mbbac · · Score: 1

      That is why when you have your conference with your builder, you tell them were to place all of the jacks (except electrical, that is by code).

      --

      mbbac

  11. White Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the the high priced crips have the Internet hooked up. If you buy a 120,000 house, no connection. Damn, the WHITE MAN is always trying to screw me.

    1. Re:White Man by Saratoga+C++ · · Score: 1

      um... $120k for a house, in that area??

      you havn't been here before have you. the AVERAGE price for the houses they're putting in that local is about 350k if not 400k. 120k will buy you a 1 bedroom condo. my mom just spent 195k for a townhome w/ three beedrooms. and thats in a town NEAR the area, if your in it expect the prices to go up at least 15%

    2. Re:White Man by BJH · · Score: 0

      $US195K? Sounds pretty good to me.

      I'd have to pay more than that for a two-bedroom house on a postage-stamp's worth of land over an hour from central Tokyo.

      My brother-in-law bought a 1500 sq. foot plot of land in western Tokyo for about $800K. The house cost him another $350K.

  12. Re:New? Not really... by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did someone try this around the turn of the century with the works even being paid in company script to be used in company stores?

  13. Missing the point... by SonicBurst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course, it seems more cost-effective to just blanket the area with Wi-Fi...

    Blanketing the area with Wi-Fi misses the point behind this....ie:easily upgradeable last mile delivery. Current Wi-Fi speeds are great for small areas, but shared 11Mbit (or 54 or whatever) will only last so long. Fiber, however, has nearly unlimited capacity, for all intents and purposes.

    Put Wi-Fi in, and you'll be replacing it in 5 or 6 years due to larger bandwidth needs. Use fiber, and in 5-6 years you'll STILL be thinking how to saturate that link. Oh, and BTW, Cat 5 hasn't been around since '86 :) Just picking! I know what you meant!

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    1. Re:Missing the point... by rdewald · · Score: 1

      You're right about cat5, it was a typo, I meant 1996. I didn't even get a CPU at home until 1989!

      I hadn't thought about the bandwidth problems with 11Mbit (or 54 or whatever), but that also seems upgradable for the last mile.

      Perhaps this is why other, smarter people are planning these things...

      --
      The best way to do is to be.
    2. Re:Missing the point... by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

      I didn't even get a CPU at home until 1989!

      Yeah, I got my first computer in '89 too...a Tandy Color Computer 2 (lowers head in shame). I didn't get my first real PC until I got a 386/25 in ~1993.

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    3. Re:Missing the point... by CaptainAx · · Score: 1

      Blanketing the area with Wi-Fi or Fiber doesn't matter. Both are going to increase in speed and require the same changes (end user hardware and head end hardware) as technology progresses.

  14. Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by coupland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For some reason people always mistake the word "fibre" for nirvana, computing paradise, the valhalla of networking. Fact is I've got cable internet and it can handle up to 10Mbps, far more than they actually give me. I'd kill for a 10Mbit link, let alone 100Mbit. The thing that kills you isn't the physical layer, it's the routing and throttling your ISP does -- fibre in itself changes nothing. Give me cable internet with fast routing and no bandwidth caps over fibre any day...

    1. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by Yoweigh116 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but last mile wiring is what makes all that stuff capped where it is. Remember, a network connection is on as fast as its slowest part.
      I'm pretty sure their fiber is faster that my telephone wire or your coax. A neighborhood LAN would be pretty nice, too. Administrating it would be a pain, though.

      Just my $.02.

      -Yoweigh

    2. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But it does for a community with a common network backbone - you get the big pipes to all of the people on the backbone.

      So 100 Mbps to your neighborhood - and up to a city - starts to enable interesting applications that just aren't possible today. You are basically taking a state-of-art Enterpirse network and bringing it to people's homes.

    3. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by BJH · · Score: 1

      You can get FTTH 100Mbps service in and around Tokyo for $US50-80 a month, that gives you actual bandwidth of 10-30Mbps, and no download cap.

      Aren't you just dying of envy right about now? ;)

    4. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, from what I understand, cable internet can handle up to 10Mbps on the upstream and up to 38Mbps on the downstream.

    5. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FIBER

    6. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by caferace · · Score: 1
      Fact is I've got cable internet and it can handle up to 10Mbps

      Well, fact is some of "us" like to run a web server from home, or other services. Unless you're lucky, most cable providers block port 80, and some go further.

      I've had cable, and I dropped "back" to ADSL. Sure, I missed the extra download speed, but the bullshit I had to deal with the provider just wasn't worth it. Port 80 is not blocked. Plus, with cable I indeed saw transfer rates decline in the evening when the average user came home and logged onto AOL.

      Not my cuppa tea.

    7. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      As a current (relativly) happy TimeWarner RoadRunner user, I'd like to add to this.
      Currently theyre only blocking the ports that are used by windows file sharing, But most of the people I know with roadrunner have had their port80 blocked. It sucks, but so does the dsl around here.

      From what I've read, SpeakEasy looks like the best choice for broadband isps, THey offer static ips, no blocked ports, they let you use the bandwidth they allocate to you, you can share it with anyone in your house, and all that good stuff that makes this one hell of a run on sentance.

      I dont know if i could live without my 2mbit downstream though. It makes downloading those isos a breeze.

      As for the service hit, I've never had my bandwidth drop during peek usage hours. However, my latency takes a noticable hit. When playing counterstrike in my private server hosted by artofwarcentral.com at 3am, i get about 40-50ms ping. Around the time school gets out, my ping is 50-70. Its not crippling but it is noticable.

      Also, Another thing you might want to know before going with cable: You get packeted with Arp Who-has packets (how your isp knows what IPs are allocated) By packeted, i mean i'm getting one every 0.1ms at the latest. Its not a noticable load, But i cant help but its annoying if youre packetsniffing without any filters.

      Oh, and one last rant: Roadrunner thinks 'internet access' is HTTP Gets. Youre barely allowed to do anything else

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    8. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      I'd kill for a 10Mbit link, let alone 100Mbit

      Another thing people miss is the fact that just because you have 100Mbit link to your computer doesn't mean you are going to get 100Mbit/sec xfer rates. put two ( and only two ) normal everyday PC's on a 100Mbit switched LAN and ftp a file between them, if you get above 60Mbit/sec I'd be surprised.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    9. Re:Fibre is just a network cable, relax guys... by coupland · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The fact of the matter is that most NICs don't have chipsets efficient enough to fill a network cable, I read a benchmark (granted it was a few years ago) where the best of the best managed around 80Mbit/s with most averaging around 20Mbit/s. Not very efficient for a 100meg NIC. On top of that if you have multiple PCs on your segment you'll find Ethernet's CDMA algorithm causes performance to decrease exponentially with traffic, at 80% utilization most ethernets become basically useless. Not an issue in your typical home network but at a university or work you'll never ever see throughput close to 100%.

  15. Re:New? Not really... by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 1

    Duh. I ment the last last century. It's 21st now. Me fail english that's unpossible!

  16. Re:slashdot sucks by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ugh, they should. would get rid of so much crap

  17. Re:New? Not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you linux people are so funny... really, what a great and witty connection. except for the fact that microsoft doesn't own the place and microsoft doesn't own any of the stores in the place. bleh...

  18. Security...? by MrNemesis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A pre-wired house, yes I'd love it.

    But a whole intranet community? I don't like the idea of being LANned up with the whole estate. Surely there'll be plenty of people who have no idea how to secure their boxes and suchlike...? Could easily be a black hats heaven, especially in a corporate environment.

    Mind you, it'd give the opportunity for the biggest beowulf-cluster-of-LAN-parties ever.

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    1. Re:Security...? by knowledgepeacewi · · Score: 1

      >Could easily be a black hats heaven, especially in a corporate environment.
      Could just as easily be the next training environment for security guru's of the future.

    2. Re:Security...? by jbolden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How would that be a problem? You have one point of access to your own home network, you firewall it off and use NAT. That's not that big a problem to deal with.

    3. Re:Security...? by MrFreezeBU · · Score: 1

      Not if you live in Michigan!!!!

  19. The neighborhood intranet by miketang16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would be quite interesting. I'd have to say gaming would rock, but I sure hope all the Joe Windows users know how to use Windows Update...

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
    1. Re:The neighborhood intranet by akb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how the intranet will be managed. Will whoever is running it monitor it for copyrighted material? Or could someone setup a video service that competed with the local cable company?

  20. I dunno if I'd be welcome there.. by whoppo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Forget the long hair.. nevermind the tie-dye shirt.. I'm sure those wouldn't make any difference at all to my neighbors, but I don't have a single Windows machine in the house! I'd never fit in.

    --
    chown -R us /base
  21. MS campus Vaporware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Working in the IT dept for the city of Isssaquah I have seen the MS campus scaled back and/or put on hold enough times to invite Duke Nukem Forever comparisons. I cant wait to see these million dollar homes go on the market without any real incentive for power geeks to move there.

  22. Wiring and real estate by guacamolefoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The idea of building fiber to the home in new developments is not a bad idea in some locations. In others, it makes no sense at all. The issue for builders is going to be whether the item is a value-add for their buyers. Right now, there is just no compelling reason to have fiber to newly developed houses in most places. WiFi or cable or DSl are quite simply enough. In certain areas that are R&D hotbeds or technology havens, perhaps. In most of the rest of the US it just makes no sense.

    A new 2000-2500 square foot house on a half acre costs about 150-200k here. Tack on a grand or even $500 for just 10 base T wiring, which is a feature that most people will not use, really eats into your margins as a builder. Why do it?

    As I mentioned above, you have to look at your area and your demographics if you are a contractor/developer. There may be niches for this, but I just do not see it being standard for all new development.

    FWIW, any house I build or do any significant renovations to will have more network ports than phone jacks. If I were building houses for others, there's no way I'd sink the money into it.

    GF.

    1. Re:Wiring and real estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A new 2000-2500 square foot house on a half acre costs about 150-200k here."

      Good god what magical land do you live in and can you give me directions?! Around here that's about $400,000, and more around $750,000 about 30 miles north.
      -----

    2. Re:Wiring and real estate by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      Central PA. Our unemployment rate is below the national average, and you can afford to live like a human being on $50,000 per year.

      Please do not move anywhere near me, however. My house (admittedly old and decrepit) is 1800 sq. ft. and it cost me 72,000 on a 1/8 acre lot.

      Flyover country has its benefits. You might try leaving the major metro areas behind.

      GF.

    3. Re:Wiring and real estate by mosch · · Score: 1

      oh, so you live in the portion of Pennsylvania commonly referred to as 'Alabama' then. I almost moved out there to take a job with Adelphia (I liked the concept of a $400,000 house that includes a runway), but then I realized... what the hell kind of fool would want to live in Central Pennsylvania?

    4. Re:Wiring and real estate by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      oh, so you live in the portion of Pennsylvania commonly referred to as 'Alabama' then. I almost moved out there to take a job with Adelphia (I liked the concept of a $400,000 house that includes a runway), but then I realized... what the hell kind of fool would want to live in Central Pennsylvania?

      Ahhh...one of those. Central PA is referred to by the ignorant as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and Alabama in between. If that is what you truly think, then I am glad for you that you decided to live elsewhere. I'm also glad for me. FWIW, Coudersport is completely unlike south central PA (word up to the Amish hood), which is where I am. The northern tier is a little odd.

      GF.

    5. Re:Wiring and real estate by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I had a new house built about a year ago. The builder charged me $30 a drop, but that was only for the cabling. I had to bring my own switch and jacks, and wire the jacks myself.

      No biggie, but even with the jacks and switch, I think you're closer, if not under, the $500 then the $1K. And yes, I put a jack in every room in the house, and two in some.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    6. Re:Wiring and real estate by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      The builder charged me $30 a drop, but that was only for the cabling. I had to bring my own switch and jacks, and wire the jacks myself.

      A basic switch, pre-wired to each jack in a room, minimum of two jacks to a room in a three bedroom house, including face plates, drywall cutting, and setting aside square footage or wall-space for a mounted switch and having the contractor do it (rather than the part DIY you did), and I think $500 is sort of a lowball estimate. YMMV.

      GF.

    7. Re:Wiring and real estate by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

      yeah, but in central pa you get the monday after thanksgiving off of work because it's the first day of deer season and every good pa citizen has to go out hunting then :)

    8. Re:Wiring and real estate by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      If they want to take it off, good for them. That isnt censorship.

      Not all of us, only about a million or so of us. With rifles. Shooting at things that move. It's more fun that you may think.

      GF.

    9. Re:Wiring and real estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."that"... ..."than"...

      Damn brain.

    10. Re:Wiring and real estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they want to take it off, good for them. That isnt censorship.

      Windowing systems and cut and paste are clearly beyond my limited capabilities. Shoulda been the clip about hunting season and everyone getting the Monday after Thanksgiving off to go hunting. Blah.

    11. Re:Wiring and real estate by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Most new housing in NC above $150k comes with CAT5 wiring standard. Of course, here $100/sqft is for pricier houses.

      --

      mbbac

    12. Re:Wiring and real estate by wesmo · · Score: 1

      First off, builder's margins are H-U-G-E. They fall into the extreme comfort range of 30-50%, depending on the area.

      Builders, along with everyone else, are all about making as much money as they can, which translates to spending as little as possible. As an example, I remember the Brazillians who framed out my house.. I can guarantee that they were not being paid minimum wage (and, oddly, the one guy burned his toolbelt in effegy since his indenture was complete and he was heading back home).

      With that in mind, my builder (5+ years ago) had no problems having the house wired per my specifications providing I supplied them with the CAT-5.

      Of course, I also did not have them do the terminations. I had them run the physical cable, and I spent the time properly terminating it (aka: wiring it to the jack).

      Builders will do the work, that's not the issue. It is easy, and probably profitable, to offer a pre-wired "technological" home as an option that the customer can pay for. :-)

    13. Re:Wiring and real estate by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I did the contracting for my own house and did one thing that I thought would be invaluable.

      When I put in the underground utilities (phone, power) I made sure to bury an empty conduit with a string inside so I'd be ready when the time came.

      It didn't cost much at all, and I know most contractors and builders will cut this tiny corner, but it will make a big difference to me.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  23. A warning from Tom Joad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you move in, they drop the price they pay for each basket of peaches you pick.

    Your Microsoft money can only be "activated" at the company store.

    And that free internet comes from the mandatory homeowners association fees.

  24. Samples of Linux? by Speare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the first month of home sales, Red Hat should offer fresh boxed copies of Linux (yes, with the usual support) to each new resident. Just drop off the promotional crate with the sales agent; it's just like some laundry detergent, barbecue briquette or furniture coupons that other subdivisions offer their new home-owning residents.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Samples of Linux? by glitch! · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the first month of home sales, Red Hat should offer fresh boxed copies of Linux (yes, with the usual support) to each new resident. Just drop off the promotional crate with the sales agent; it's just like some laundry detergent, barbecue briquette or furniture coupons that other subdivisions offer their new home-owning residents.

      How about Linux missionaries riding their bicycles through the neighorhoods?

      (The doorbell rings, two young men dressed in simple black and white clothes waiting.)

      homeowner: Yes?
      missionary: Hello, sir. Have you ever tried Linux?
      homeowner: Isn't that a laundry detergent?
      missionary: Only in Germany, sir. Would you be interested to know that you don't have to buy Windows every two years?
      homeowner: I think you're an encyclopedia salesman! And I like Windows.
      missionary: Why not give Linux a try? Here, I'll install it for you. (pushes door open and runs for computer room)
      homeowner: Hey, get out of here! I'll call the police!
      (2 hours later...)
      homeowner: (robot voice) I like Linux. I hate Windows. RMS is a god. I must tell my friends.
      missionary: Very good sir! See you at the next LUG meeting, then!

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    2. Re:Samples of Linux? by phoebus1553 · · Score: 1

      When you actually realize that this is a 95% MS subsidised (usually by way of employment of inhabitants) then you understand that Linux is probably really unheard of...

      But it would be a nice thought.

      --
      ----- - The beatings will continue until morale improves
    3. Re:Samples of Linux? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nice thought. But I think that you missed the "3 million square feet" that MSFT is building up the street. This will be a MSFT enclave, and Red Hat would be a tough sell there. Would make the Intranet an interesting place, though...

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:Samples of Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up "fifth column" in military strategy circles, sometime.

    5. Re:Samples of Linux? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      "Hi! I'm Patty, I'm the neighbourhood welcome wagon! Here's a free copy of linux!"

      "WOW GREAT! And I just ran out of toilet paper!"

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  25. Oh My. by cmdrTaco+(The+Devil) · · Score: 1

    I've died? Gone to Heaven? Wow. Free Fibre. That's better than free soup from the Soup Nazi! I hope more towns do this, near my house in Kingston, ON. :)

  26. A prewired house to me is worth by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    no more than an unwired house.

    It took me all of a saturday to run cat5 to four bedrooms, my wife and I's offices, the rec room (xbox/ps2/divx box), the living room (another xbox), the other living room, and the 'arcade' room thats just sort of an extra room in this fucked up house.

    Short of that, there are 'power plug' networks, phone line networks, and wireless, all of which I've used successfully (and transparently). But 100mbit on my local lan (with gigabit in the future) is great.

    A community intranet? I really dont want to see the beastiality incest porn that my hillbilly neighbours no doubt live on.

    As for more b/w to the demarking point outside, that's all fine by me. But I doubt I'd be willing to pay any more than I do now for my plain jane cablemodem.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  27. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by knowledgepeacewi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    or any other communist nation:
    using the latest and greatest technology would be mandated by the state.
    How horrible does communism sound now?

    1. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not like capitalism has done much good for this high school student with no earning power ooh well

  28. Check out the picture of that couple ... by DogIsMyCoprocessor · · Score: 2, Funny
    in the home page for Issaquah Highland.

    "We met at a Starbucks. She was in one that was across the street from the one I was in"

    "We both feel so lucky to be living in a time of such wonderful catalogs."

    --

    "And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."

  29. Make mine coax.... by mr.+methane · · Score: 4, Informative

    10 yeara ago, fiber was the obvious best choice for high-bandwidth connections. Nowadays, though, a good chunk of coaxial cable seems to be a more practical choice.

    A cable modem capable of communicating at 20+mbps goes for about $80. 100 of them can coexist politely on the same broadcast domain.

    On the other hand, an optical transceiver costs about 10x as much, is very picky about how the connection is terminated, and doesn't compensate automatically for differing power levels (anybody who carries a bag of attenuators around a colo knows allllll about that:)

    For linking cabinet c19.33 to the meet-me room at 1 Wilshire? Gimme fiber. Linking two POP's together across town? Single-mode fiber!

    Connecting my house to the internet? Gimme copper. Preferably coax.

    Fiber, implemented at the carrier level, is an incredibly efficient transmission medium; I lease OC48 wavelengths in the same physical fiber as half a dozen other companies, and I get a lot of bandwidth for a (comparatively) smaller price. But I don't use fiber in the office, or at home.

    1. Re:Make mine coax.... by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 1

      Would fiber would have to worry about Downstream Signal to Noise Ratio?
      Upstream SNR?
      Transmit Power?
      Receive Power?
      Signal degradation due to splitters?
      Bandwidth saturation on a DS3 at peak times?
      Electromagnetic Interferance?

      I wouldnt mind trying out fiber at all to see what the downfalls are besides needing a pocket book like BillyBoy Gates.

      --
      -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
    2. Re:Make mine coax.... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1
      >Would fiber would have to worry about Downstream Signal to Noise Ratio?

      Yes.

      >Upstream SNR?

      Yes.

      >Transmit Power?

      There are two standard levels used: .3db below what I need, and 5db above what I can handle. Carriers like to alternate between these two.

      >Receive Power?

      In spades.

      >Signal degradation due to splitters?

      The causes for signal degradation on fiber are more numerous than I can name. And trying to find the one guy at a carrier who understands them can be a hair-pulling experience that makes ISDN look like a cakewalk by comparison.

      >Bandwidth saturation on a DS3 at peak times?

      Bandwidth saturation has nothing to do with media. GigE over fiber behaves just like GigE over copper.

      >Electromagnetic Interferance?

      No, but on the other hand, coax stands up to being nudged occasionally much better. That, plus the ability for a typical homeowner to terminate cable with simple hand tools, makes it a lot more attractive to me.

      I run gig ethernet over copper (with the usual distance limitations) cheaply and easily. 1000baseT equipment runs under $100 per port. 1000baseF equipment costs quite a bit more.

      Leaving aside extremely expensive technologies like DWDM, fiber is a baseband technology: it carries one signal at a time. Coax, on the other hand, uses broadband, which is why you can fit 130 channels of broadcast TV (each using about 2.4mb/s of bandwidth, 8 channels of HDTV (20mb/s each), and 30 channels of IP data (20mb/s each) down the same wire - and use cheap, store-bought equipment to do so.

      Fiber certainly has a place; but that place is gererally where you're dealing with sustained, high-volume data (OC-3 and up), you can afford a hardware cost of $6,000* per port, and you can protect the fiber from physical damage.

      *it actually goes waaaaaay up from there. A channelized OC48(2.04gb/s) card for a router has a list price that's comparable to a reasonably nice single-family house.

    3. Re:Make mine coax.... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Sounds good!

      Explain to me, again, though, why I need to replace the last segments of coax cable and hub to get 100 Mb ethernet on my home network?

      I mean, if coax is so much better than (say) UTP, I have to replace the coax with UTP to get 100 Mb?

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Make mine coax.... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      Groan.... Never said you should. Twisted-pair works perfactly fine for carrying a baseband signal. Like 100baseT. Or DS-1. Or POTS. (it does not do as well, as anyone using DSL has noted, at carrying anything resembling a broadband signal)

      My point is that copper is a more appropriate technology *for* *the* *average* *consumer* than fiber-optic is.. and if someone's telling you differently, you would do well to question exactly what it is that they're selling you.

    5. Re:Make mine coax.... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      A cable modem capable of communicating at 20+mbps goes for about $80. 100 of them can coexist politely on the same broadcast domain.

      I think you meant to say collision domain above rather than broadcast domain. Cable modems on the same cable "segment" (if that's the cable word for it) do share bandwidth. In fact, it is possible to hack some cable modems to sniff the traffic it sees. Cable modems usually just filter out everyone else's traffic like an ethernet card when not in promiscous mode.

    6. Re:Make mine coax.... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      You could be right. Cable modems use something that looks a little bit like what IBM would have come up with if they couldn't have tortured us with Token-ring.

      If you're one of those really weird people who reads technical documents for fun (like me) take a look at www.cablemodem.com - the way that DOCSIS is actually laid out is pretty impressive, with the ability to channel-hop on demand (two of your neighbors go on a pr0n-browsing spree, so the headend tells your cable modem to jump to a channel with less traffic so your SSH session doesn't get hammered by Debbie doing Dallas.

    7. Re:Make mine coax.... by jjo · · Score: 1

      It really depends on your planning timescale. For the next few years, you are correct. However, in the future you will see the price of really high-rate connectivity drop, and then fiber will come into its own. At that point, your "chunk of coax" will have to be replaced.

      But, you may ask, is now the right time to install that fiber leading into your home?

      If you believe (as many do) that a financially viable FTTH system is impossible at this time, check out
      Fastweb, a FTTH provider in Italy. They are currently providing all-optical broadband service in Milan, Rome, Turin, Bologna, and Genoa. In the USA, things are happening much more slowly, but there are already
      70 communities with FTTH service, and lots more considering or planning it.

      If you want to hold onto your "chunk of coax" based on today's pricing of telecommunications equipment and services, go right ahead. However, be aware that a full life-cycle cost comparison might already come out in favor of fiber, and the long-term trends are clearly in favor of fiber.

    8. Re:Make mine coax.... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you've missed my point.

      Why are "new" 100/1000 Mb networks setup with UTP cables, instead of Coax?

      I understand quite well that Coax has a much "cleaner" signal than UTP, if only for the simple fact that it's shielded.

      So why has UTP "won" over coax, and why is it you don't find 100 Mb NICs that use coax?

      Is it price alone?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  30. Only reason I'm still in on-campus housing by fatalist23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is because of the excellent connection I get from my college dorm room. Reading this article reminds me of why I haven't opted to get an appartment in the city surrounding my University; I'd have to go through the hassle of getting myself a cable modem or other sort of broadband connection, or send myself back to the "Dark Ages" ;) by putting up with a phone line connection. I see myself considering a house's connection as a definite bonus in the future. Admittedly, it isn't that hard to wire a home, but if the house is in one of those areas that still can't get a cable modem connection, it'll definitely affect my choices.

    1. Re:Only reason I'm still in on-campus housing by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

      If your college is like most colleges, using the dorm ethernet also sends you back to the "Dark Ages" of blocked file-sharing ports, limitations on runninger personal servers, and various other sundry you don't have to deal with when you've got DSL or a decent neighbourhood system. Cable is hit and miss on those things due to varying TOS, but DSL is definitely more hassle-free, at least at my university, than dorm ethernet.

      --
      -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
  31. File servers and firewalls by jeanicinq · · Score: 0

    Besides wireless networks, we know that a fiber optic network is a real choice for firewalls.

    With that in mind, we know that new businesses are going to be built that do not worry about "hosted internet service," but do offer localized file shares. For example, instead of those costly update times to the library repository for each individual user, we only have to update the community server. We can see that open source software has more potential as community binaries compose a unsuspected threat. Community police might have to investigate the source.

    Another last mile fiber optic service is located in Sacramento, SureWest. Last time I called them, I recieved a good offer, but the cable ended about a block away.

  32. It should also be noted, by big-dog · · Score: 1

    that Bill Gates's house is very close (approx 19 min) by in Medina.

  33. Neighborhood Intranet by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While a community intranet seems like a nice idea, I'm afraid it will likely be strangled by the unforgiving leash of community policy that's become so popular in modern neighborhood developments. As a form of legislation by contract, not usually subject to constitutional protections, neighborhoods could easily prohibit any but the most inoffensive content being hosted by servers connected to the intranet.

    An anarchist intranet, on the other hand, would be a joy to see.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  34. description of the surroundings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've lived about a half-mile north of the map on the highlands site for 15 years and graduated from Issaquah High School, so maybe I can help give an idea of the surroundings. Issaquah is in a attractive valley surrounded by Tiger Mountain and the Sammamish Plateau to the east and Cougar Mountain to the west, and the large Sammamish lake to the north. It's a generally wealthy mostly white area with some very wealthy communities. There are a number of Asian-Americans and a growing Indian-American population but very few African-Americans and not many Hispanics.

    For me it's about a 30 minute drive to Seattle but for the Highlands with the new I-90 entrance I bet they could make it in 20. Traffic can be truly awful in downtown Issaquah but with their own entrance, they ought to have that taken care of. On the other hand they'll have to deal with the background noise of a freeway next door...

    Issaquah has the second largest theatre in Washington State (last I heard), a movie theatre, actually one of the worst types with 10 minutes of advertisements before previews, and three medium to large shopping centers. If the new Highlands shopping center truly has the variety of the University District (as the site mentions, if I understand right) I would be amazed. Except for our theatre, and the first Krispy Kreme built in the Northwest (or something) I don't imagine too many people come to visit or shop at Issaquah. We're basically the last large town for a while on the way east out of Seattle, the edge of the serious suburban sprawl.

    Probably like many others here, the coolest part of this seems to me like the internet connection and the intranet. We have MSN DSL and Comcast Cable here currently, at standard speeds. As a resident I wonder if this development will bring something new and interesting after the hundreds (really! a new one is being built 100 ft from my house right now) that have already gone up in this area. One thing I might hope is that the schools will indirectly become more tech-savvy. :) But it might be a while before they start using Linux. ;)

  35. eBay is not pig latin! by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think municipal fiber or any other high capacity medium is a project everyone ought to be pressuring their city or town counsils for. There's currently two groups laying network cabling down, telephone companies and cable companies. Being commercial interest these groups will always do what is better or more beneficial to them than what is more beneficial or better for the communities they serve.

    Being as their commercial interest is rarely in line with what is good for the people it should be the people putting up the lines and selling that space to people providing them service. I see it like this, if a town lays down some fiber they can put it just about anywhere without worrying about right of way issues or zoning restrictions. They are also laying out an infrastructure they are able to rent out to companies to offer services on. Renting out the infrastructure means they can issue bonds to pay for the line installation with a nice return. The line installation itself can be piggybacked on top of routine road, sewer, or power maintenance to keep man hour prices down.

    Once the lines are in place and going out to homes it would be up to providers to rent space on the lines in a non-exclusive manner to sell services on. Without the overhead of upkeep a service provider can offer cheaper service than a provider paying the whole bill from head end to household. The rent goes to pay back the issued bond measures and commercial property and operating taxes go back into the municipal coffers.

    By having really high bandwidth lines like fiber or high grade copper the municipality can offer bandwidth on a channel by channel basis. Want to offer internet access to the city? Rent out a couple data channels on the fiber lines and connect your head end to a top tier carrier. Want to have a public access television channel? Invest in some video equipment and rent a channel. All municipal services could have their own cheap and easy network access via such a set-up as well. Public and private schools could have dirt cheap network connectivity as could libraries and social services.

    I think a lot of good could come from projects like this and with it being a local municipal issue a couple people writing letters and making phone calls might actually DO something other than give paper shredders a workout.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    1. Re:eBay is not pig latin! by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Cities and towns only fail to worry about zoning or rights-of-way when abusing their power. They are an entity that must follow the same laws as everyone else. Cities rarely own much land, except for public rights of way, and the land situated under public buildings. All of the rest of the "city" is held by private individuals, so yes, they do need to worry about those issues.

      No overhead for upkeep? Excuse me, but there's a definite overhead. Either you pay for it all in taxes, and the providers rape the taxpayers, or you pay for it in user fees. Either way, there are just as many costs involved as private enterprise, plus the added burden of paying the people who comprise the bureaucracy designated to administer the infrastructure and business behind licensing use of the infrastructure.

      Just because commercial interests are not necessarily in line with those of non-commercial entities does not make it a compelling issue to destroy commercial interests. Look at the Soviet Union, and what happened when they destroyed commercial interests. There is no more Soviet Union. You cannot remove commercial interest without, by necessity, managing ALL interest by force (all government authority derives from the threat or use of force).

      Unfortunately, what it always comes down to with municipalities is taxes. There is no way to implement a system like this without increasing taxes. Bonds don't pay for it all unless it's something wildly popular coupled with enough people with enough money to buy the bonds, coupled with the city making investmest that provide enough rate of return to redeem the bonds, plus the bond interest, plus the costs of the installation.

      This doesn't happen, because municipalities don't invest enough of their capital. They spend it. That means that the money has to come from either service cuts or taxes (they don't have the other option of monetizing debt, only the federal government can get away with that). Service cuts? From a political body? Not on your life, unless they absolutely have to! So taxes go up. Taxes that someone or other is forced to pay.

      Essentially, what is being advocated is that cities should shoulder a group of people with the burden of paying for infrastructure to be built so that a bunch of other people can have cheap access to a bunch of bandwidth.

      Now, can you tell me where in any state or federal Constitution there is an enumerated right to be provided with cheap bandwidth through the force of a governmental agency, at someone else's expense? There isn't one, meaning that it is not something that is within the lawful purview of any municipality. Remember, municipalities derive their power from delegated state powers. States derive their powers from those held by their populace, as delegated in the state's Constitution.

  36. New Developments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I live in one of these new developments - Mawson Lakes (South Australia) - which is located right next to technology park. (Motorolla, BAE systems etc are located there)

    We were made all sorts of promises about cable tv & internet. We even had to have the house pre-wired. I recently got pay tv which had to be connected by satelite and our broad-band internet must be wireless because the developer (delfin) put in the cheapest exchange which is not capable of ADSL. Apparently the cable is even in the ground!

    Although, reading up on some of the benfits of wire less it may turn out to be the best way to go.

    my 2 cents

  37. Community Intranet by cranos · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is something I should take to our local Council. Instead of Fibre or copper though we should really look at Wi-Fi.
    The area I live in is right up against a pretty steep escarpment and we could quite effectively bounce the signals off the escarpment and back down onto the town.

  38. Pre-wired house? by insecuritiez · · Score: 1, Troll

    How hard is it to run the last mile of cable when you aren't running cable at all?

    It's sad that this sounds state-of-the-art. Fiber backbones have been around for a long time. I'm betting that their backbone is switched gigabit. Nice for the local intranet, but not noticeably faster than a good old 10Mbps CAT5 link. In fact, in my opinion, putting in wires has already dated the project. What would have really gotten me going is if Issaquah WA had installed 802.11.x (a, b, or g) access points and was offering Intra/Inter net via wireless access. Yesterday wires were in, wireless is happening today.

    And don't even mention security; there are many good stream ciphers out there. (Does RC4 ring a bell?)

  39. Not worth much to me by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    except to save some time. Truth be told, I'd rather wire the house myself. That's most of the fun of doing it, IMHO, is the hard part. But, it would be nice to have that fiber connection. I could run one helluva game server off that thing, plus a web server, etc....ok, I changed my mind...it would be pretty sweet!

    Only part the really is unsettling is paying TAXES on that sort of thing being pre-setup. Speaking of which, what kind of value WOULD that add to the house?!?

    1. Re:Not worth much to me by JJahn · · Score: 1

      Thats the truth, anything you think you might get "free" is always paid for, by the taxpayers in this case. So you might get fast internet, but its going to cost you quite a bit I bet.

  40. Re:[OT] Re:53 states in the US of A ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that democracy only works when the people share common goals and outlook on life. When people have differences that cannot be reconciled, then democracy tends to allow those in the majority to overpower the others if they wish. Dividing the land into areas of relative "harmony" may help to reduce this problem.

    Why stop there? Why not divide the country into relative areas of "harmony". As a native of California, I'm tired of the direction those Right-Wing Fascists are taking this country.
    So, why not secede? Oh wait.... Maybe cause of the little incident known as the civil war?
    Then again, people from um..."rural" areas seem to forget that they lost that little skirmish.

    Moderators, do your worst. After all, I'm posting as an Anonymous Coward.

  41. Re:[OT] Re:53 states in the US of A ? by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I remember hearing from my high school civics teacher that there were some efforts by northern Californians to split off from the rest of the state and form a state called "Jefferson". I don't think that got anywhere, obviously :P Northern Cali. is really rural, and feels more like a warm(er) version of Oregon or Idaho than what most people think of California as being. I don't think there's even much agriculture in the area, it's mostly forest land.

    I suspect that the urban/rural split is felt in a lot of states, and it would be interesting what would happen to the domestic political scene if the urban(more liberal) areas became separate states.

  42. Accessing Fiber Already in Place... by pkw111 · · Score: 0

    Do any of you have any suggestions for how to go about getting your community access to pre-existent fiber lines?

    I live in a small New Hampshire town with no options for high speed internet access besides a personal sattelite hook-up. We are just too far from commercial or population centers for cable or DSL infastructure to be feasible. The frustrating part is that according to some public records, there are already massive amounts of fiberoptic cabling running right through the town center...they just never physically pop up into an access box. It just seems to me that if there was a fiber junction box in the town center, it could easily be adapted to the existing copper (for DSL) or to the existing cable (for cable duh)

    What methods would you reccomend to convince/force/help the regional telcos involved to give access to our community? There are a couple of local computer user groups...maybe an effort through them? Maybe a town-endorsed subsidy to help with the cost of creating access points?

    1. Re:Accessing Fiber Already in Place... by tprox · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you'd have to run for a town leadership position and make the case that it would be worth it to pursue such an effort. That's probably harder to do, but you never know. I'm over in Merrimack, and I have Cable Internet, but I have some friends past the Keene area who are using satellite as you are. I'd be interested if you could accomplish such a task :)

  43. Hell yeah fiber by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 1

    Would fiber would have to worry about Downstream Signal to Noise Ratio?
    Upstream SNR?
    Transmit Power?
    Receive Power?
    Signal degradation due to splitters?
    Bandwidth saturation on a DS3 at peak times?
    Bandwidth sharing along nodes?
    Electromagnetic Interferance?

    Even if you have a cablemodem supporting speeds in excess of 100Mbs, most broadband internet companies cap your bandwidth at around 3Mbs which is subpar to a standard 10BaseT network. Hack the config file in the modem so it does not match the checksum on their servers and you find yourself permanently without service. The advantage of coax currently is the existing cable tree foundation already in place for cable television just needing an internet frequency to piggy back through. I wouldnt mind trying out fiber at all to see what the downfalls are besides needing a pocket book like BillyBoy Gates. But if fiber were more widely used and less of a special thing prices would fall like reliability with a M$ patch and OS.

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  44. More Important the the Internet Access by Sokie · · Score: 1

    More importantly, there is a Krispy Kreme right down the street!

    Mmmmmm, Krispy Kreme... Actually, I think this would be a bad thing. Right now it's nice to stop at Krispy Kreme every few months when I drive through Issaquah, but if I lived next door, I'm afraid I would find myself morbidly obese and unable to leave the house. Of course, with sooper-l33t interweb access, I guess I wouldn't need to leave the house. Hooray!

    -Sokie

    --
    ------
    Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
  45. why not by geekoid · · Score: 1

    wireless?

    The biggest issue with wireless is 'bandwirdth' leeches, but if everybody has one, I don't see that this would be a problem.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What type of wireless? Not 802.11b, it will work inside of one house. It won't work for connecting the neighbors, unless they all read slashdot and put yagi antennas on their APs. I use Sprint broadband direct, and they charge $40/month, but it works 25-30 miles in any direction from the mountain with a clear line of sight. This is more of a city issue, and the house still has to be wired or use 802.11b.

      Either way, I think everybody should have fiber, then downloading stuff will go at the correct speeds. People who stilll use modems need to adapt and change.

    2. Re:why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      untill you see a slew of mini vans parkd on every street and look inside and see people from all the other neighborhoods playing games on your lan throughout the community every weekend.

  46. Right here in Southern California by mughi · · Score: 1

    Well, we were just looking at a new development here in Orange County. There are quite a few houses, and they go from the 300's up through the 600's (decent homes for those prices in this area). The development looks just like most others in the county, and is near to a new shopping center (that we now frequent).

    All the homes feature Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH). Basic "free" service looks to be 3,000 Kbps, with "Expanded Service" upwards of 31,000 Kbps. The service is being provided by Greenfield Communications (no, I am not associated with the housing development nor tGreenfield).

    One of the areas/subdivisions/whatever in it just opened phase 7 yesterday, and it's already sold out. Just in case others were wondering if these units were moving.

    1. Re:Right here in Southern California by mughi · · Score: 1
      provided by Greenfield Communications

      Oops. I made a broken link. But that's probably ok, since the website of the provider does not look to be there.

      :-O

      The brochure says "... or log on to egreenfield.com." I guess if people want they could just try the 800 number, but it doesn't give one a warm fuzzy feeling when the ISP's website is still a squatter's page. Eeek! and a scary subject at that. (Man am I glad I didn't link it right)

  47. community building by Maskirovka · · Score: 1
    What will this do for community building?


    Provide the infrastructure to create a top notch filesharing community! They could call it warez kiddie village.

  48. How will fibre build community? by KNicolson · · Score: 1
    I don't see how having a fibre-optic network is supposed to help a community. We can make stereotyped jokes about how it will just enable people to be even more comfortabl living in their basement, shut off from the outside physical world. Community P2P (ignoring the legal issues) will be just one more excuse not to go out of the house and see people at the video rental store.

    Sure, you may be able to hold your virtual LAN party with V(oice/ideo)oIP at any time of the day or night, but unless the population is going to be 100% glued-to-the-screen geeks, how will the stereotypical Soccer Mom get community benefit from fibre optic?

  49. What is a pre-wired house worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know, but I'm pre-wiring an empty apartment for the next tenants, with cat 5E and RJ6 in every room.

    Is $500 extra per month for that and a washer/dryer/dishwasher too much?

    That's what I'm hoping to get

  50. spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    e3jbNo.1 Solution to Lose Weight!cz vpso0selbkqsymyqdjbbz3yzyiqywuoszbspokmmx97mtc0qbp kx0gki2zgtc95gko4x 4i Phentermine is a Fast, Safe and Easy Solution!ht a.. Best Online Prices!1m
    b.. Free Online Consultationii
    c.. No prior prescription needed!qc
    d.. Shipped Overnight to your Doorxx

    fyStart Today and Be one of our successful customers...1x a.. "I was trying to loose weight for a wedding , but nothing seem to help me control my appetite until I found Phentermine. I looked GREAT at the wedding...many thanks! Mary Aller"yh v4Private and Confidentiallv u3fhmwc5comxpc9bzv94fphwitqeofvxtxjzzt6185pu5sn2ih pompoke5ftccyw068h 6pAchieve your Ideal Weight!5a
    u3fhmwc5comxpc9bzv94fphwitqeofvxtxjzzt6185pu5sn2ih pompoke5ftccyw068h q2CLICK HERE To Start NOW!di
    If you do not want to continue receive mail, please CLICK HERE to be removed from the list. Please accept our apologies if you have been sent this email in error. We honor all removal requests.

    [K5NKIYs5]

  51. Wired? by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Did I really hear you say wired???

    Fiber is a bit too late...by the time they shovel dirt into the trenches, 802.x will be the ticket, and all that work will be old news before you can say how much is that access point in the window...

    1. Re:Wired? by oldwolf13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      all this wireless talk.

      Sure, wireless is a great system for some things, but it nowhere near approaches the speed of fibre. This kind of shortsightedness in the past has cost us, why let it again?

      (640k anyone? 32MB harddrive? those are just a couple that came to mind right away)

      With a wireless solution, you're looking at buying it, and implementing it, then upgrading every couple/few years if you want to keep the bandwidth up to what other areas will (probably) be using. With fibre, lay it, and maintain it and you still have enough left over to keep you going for ages. Even when that slows down, divide the network in half, each their own network with their own uplink. Boom. Doubled your available bandwidth.

      Don't kid yourself thinking we (as a people) won't want more and more bandwidth. If I had the bandwidth I have today (DSL) at home 7 years ago, I would have thought that it was the cat's meow. Now I get by, it's decent. Actually thought of getting a cable modem as well so I could have two *decent* pipes here.

      Warez trading, p2p, and porn asside, even legitimate usages have been getting bigger all the time.

      (SUSE 8.0 anyone? 8 cds for the full release. Even slackware, my distrib of choice is 3 now for everything).

      Couple this on the fact that one day the mpaa/riaa might get it right and we could have huge content delivered to our homes via these pipes. I'd rather be able to watch a movie (and save it for later) while it's downloading, then wait a couple hours. Sometimes it's just a spur of the moment... "hey, wouldn't it be cool to see this?"

      Even 802.11g won't bring us this. Fibre will put it alot closer (altho it's not a miracle answer, it is a step in the right direction). We probably won't have wireless that can compare until like 802.11zz894t Rev. 3 or something.

      I won't even run wireless at home just because I'm such a speed freak, I don't want to wait.. .and why should I if there's an alternative. I'm looking at replacing my 100MB/s switch & nic's with gigabit stuff for just that reason. It'd be nice to VNC into a box and get near-realtime ability. Granted, not everyone is like me in this respect, but alot are, and the way the internet community is going, alot more will be.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
  52. priorities by hendridm · · Score: 1

    > You can get FTTH 100Mbps service in and around Tokyo ... Aren't you just dying of envy right about now? ;)

    He was, but then he looked around and realized he wasn't living in a shoebox with no tables.

    1. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a rather.... uninformed.... opinion of Japanese living standards.

      OK, maybe we don't have half-acre sections, but they're not as bad as you make out.

    2. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't live in New York City, let alone Toyko.

  53. One question... by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

    Do the bums have insane Internet access too? :-D

    **Slips his laptop into a backpack and prepares to hitch a ride up to Washington**

    If not I can always hold up a "Will Code for Bandwidth" sign. Damn this backassward town i live in :-/

  54. Prewired houses all the rage by doormat · · Score: 1

    I can count several developers where I live that offer prewired houses for new construction. Pulte Homes is one I have most experience with. They put in 10 or so network jacks all around the house, run two sets of ethernet cable from the closet to each jack (incase one fails or whatever). So you just stick your CM in there (there are cable and phone line jacks in the closet as well), buy a 8 port broadband router and now most of the jacks in the house are wired for internet. Its really easy for the technologically inclined.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  55. Do we really want to live like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I just say: yuck!

    I've lived in Seattle for three years, and while the city in general has struggled to become "a real city" from a quiet town, the eastside is even worse. Redmond, the home of Microsoft, is an endless array of "nice, quiet" suburbs with SUV-driving families and anonymous strip malls from hell. It's beautiful with the trees, but there is zero public transport infrastructure, no sense of real community, and no proper public gathering places (apart from a couple cookie-cutter malls).

    Even if you like the quiet life, there's no excuse for this urban sprawl, serviced by SUVs, that is just appallingly un-environmentally-friendly.

    I want to live in a city that is sophisticated and vibrant - Vancouver up north is a great example, as is my home in Sydney, Australia. Pre-manufactured suburban living, even if it is broadband enabled, is my idea of hell. I wish a few more people would agree. I fear for the future of Seattle.

  56. imagine... by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

    imagine a beowulf ddos attack on M$ (errr... i mean unintentional sql virus) of these...

  57. Utopia?? by bigbadunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, regardless of the technical details regarding this "village", what about the social aspects? Do people really want to live in a "utopian society" such as this?
    After looking at the brochures, I am startlingly reminded of scary sci-fi movies of years past, where the village residents all have the same prozac-happy, blank smiles, all work together for the same corporation, and all barbeque together on the weekends.
    Again, maybe it's just me , but a place like this (whether wired or wireless or whatever) just doesn't sound like a place I'd want to call home.
    Stepford wives, anyone??

    --

    The older I get, the less I like everyone else.
  58. My house is wired by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    I don't know any builder these days that isn't running cat5 in the walls. My house has cat5e going to every room. The phone system is run off the cat5e also. So it easy to swap phone jacks into network jacks, just pull it out of the phone switch and plug it into the router. They also will be running fiber into all the houses. They are slowly working their way through the neighborhoods so currently I just have an orange tube sticking out of my brick but eventually that'll be the fiber coming from the curb. But the internet they are going to provide is going to suck. They just don't have enough bandwidth coming into the neighborhoods to give everyone the 10mbit or 100mbit (depending upon what you want) that they advertise.

  59. WiFi no good for servers... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    ...which is the real point behind such projects -- not only a computer in every room, but a server in every coat closet, and a business running out of every bedroom.

  60. Requiring builders to install networks... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    Port Blakely Communities is also drawing the high-tech work force by requiring that every home - from the upper-$100,000s carriage houses to the $1,000,000 single-family homes - be wired to accommodate their needs. Buyers get an in-home LAN, data outlets throughout the home, a fiber optic connection to a data panel inside the home, 100 Mbps network speed, free community Intranet connection, and the choice of DSL, cable, or even fiber optics for high-speed internet access.

    This is all well and good. More communities should require this kind of thing. However, the hard problem is making the argument that builders should be required to do this. I'd really like to see a web page dedicated to this -- listing exactly what's needed, and what the costs really are. For example, each house needs this number of those jacks, so many feet of this wire, and a switch like this, all costing how many dollars. And for every so many houses, one of these big switches that cost that much, etc.

    The thing is, it doesn't have to be fiber. Ethernet would suffice, and be a hell of a lot better and cheaper than most people's current broadband options. Sure it will be outdated someday, but it's so cheap to stick into new construction now, that it should be required by most communities.

    1. Re:Requiring builders to install networks... by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Required? I don't know about that. I love networked computing as much as the next guy, but I don't want anyone telling me what I have to put into my home - aside from smoke detectors, proper electrical wiring, and other safety related things that could impact my neighbors if not properly installed. In-home LANs are neither necessary nor always wanted. We should not force them on anyone, however benign the technology is.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
  61. C'mon everybody, let's go get jobs at Microsoft! by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait, probably not this community, eh?

    I will say, Issaquah is beautiful. No traffic, and the MS site is very nice.

    They give their people free CHOCOLATE MILK at that site.

    What is this crap? I'm on the verge of being charged to park in my company parking lot, and they get free chocolate milk.

    Bastards.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  62. dude I lived there... by Thatman311 · · Score: 1

    I used to live there. I was one of the first people to live in an apartment complex there. Pretty sweet place. You can have dual t-1 bandwidth for until $300 a month (if memory serves). Every house/unit in the entire neighborhood has fiber optics into the place. Every unit is firewalled from everyone else but if you want people to have access to your place you just asked and they hooked you up.

    --
    Silly Rabbit...Sig's are for kids.
    1. Re:dude I lived there... by Blackice912 · · Score: 1

      Firewall? Dang, there goes my plans of neighborhood domination.

      Oh well, maybe I can ping dem firewalls to death.

  63. I bet ya... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I'll bet this is a way for Microsoft (or other ISP/connection providers) to place liens on homes for non-payment of bills.

  64. What kind of fiber and what language? by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    So... What kind of fiber connection would these houses get me? Ethernet? PoSONET ?
    OC-3?OC-12?OC-48? Single Mode Fiber? MultiMode Fiber? How about Two tin cans and fiber inbetween? or is the fiber just to power my phone line so I can dialup to the internet.

  65. Mick was right by djupedal · · Score: 1

    You can't always get what you want....but you can always get what you need, and where a fat pipe is a thing to desire, some people....many people...will take any pipe, and that means wireless.

    I have VDSL at home, as well as 802.b, as well as wireless from the computer to the home theater, and while I'm always lusting for more speed, it's all 'round, not just for iso's. When it comes to communities, wireless will quickly surface as the public transportation equivalent.

    Someone will always want to get there faster, and for those we have copper colored Porsches...and a premium that matches. For everyone else...wireless.

    For countries the size of California, such as Korea and Japan, FTTH will be here soon, and I'll use it along with 802. In the US...don't hold your breath.

  66. Is this the price we'll pay? by Gray · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Look at all those shiney smiling white people.

    Place looks like hell on earth based on the web site.

  67. How can I do this in my neighborhood? by mozumder · · Score: 1

    Anyone have good pointers on how to retrofit an existing neighborhood similiar in design to this neighborhood to enable fiber-to-the-curb?

  68. Best Community Ever by blacklite001 · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to point out that Issaquah not only has all the stuff listed in the post, but it also has the only Krispy Kreme in the Seattle area.

    Mmmmm, donuts.

  69. oblig simpsons quote by fxer · · Score: 1

    "I think I just logged onto my inter-net" - Carl

  70. fiber optics deployment discussion on webula.net.. by pdEo2x5o3bq · · Score: 1

    http://www.webula.net/dir/computers/internet/fiber _optics.php

  71. We have this in Italy by swinerd · · Score: 4, Informative

    A company called Fastweb wired most of Milan with fiber optic. I have a 10 Mb/sec connection at home, with unlimited calls to phone in Italy (no cell phones) at 85 euro/month. Without unlimited calls (just connection) it's 67 euro/month.
    I also have it in my office too, though it costs more.
    These are very competitive prices in Italy, but other companies offer just at most a 640K/sec ADSL.
    And it's fast: it's full 10 Mb/sec in the MAN, and there is a p2p network with 1000s of hosts in which a full movie is downloaded in about 15-20 minutes.
    In the rest of the Internet the connection is very fast, even if much less than the MAN. I generally download at 200K/sec from a decent server.
    Almost everybody I know who uses Internet and can (some areas are not wired) has Fastweb.
    There are some drawbacks: some problems with mail servers, no public nor static ip and other things. But you forget anything when you look at the speed of the connection :)

  72. UNBELIEVABLE by tenjah · · Score: 0

    I am on holiday in Japan yet again,

    Only, this time around I see adverts everywhere for.....

    100 MBP optical fibre connections for 15 quid ($22?) PER MONTH with NO BANDWITH CAP!

    Hmmmmmm, its times like these that the good old "living in an underdeveloped country" feeling kicks in again.

    Really, the above story SHOULD be irrelevant.

    If they can do it, why can't we? And I won't take the old horseshit about population density.

    The UK is not Australia, and even if it were, I would at least expect Sydney et al. (that goes for New York etc too) to be comparitively connected.

  73. Not necessarily a Good Thing by scottme · · Score: 2, Informative

    Her in the UK, there are housing developments that were connected up with optical fibre for the phone service, and it all sounded terrific at the time.

    Now the residents are up in arms because BT cannot/will not provide them with a broadband service over the fibre. ADSL is pretty much all they have to offer, and it has to run over a copper pair.

  74. Re:New? Not really... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    The private store stuff seems kinda creepy. If WA developments are anything like the east coast ones I've had the misfortune to have encountered, the stores probably revert to selling nothing but adult diapers, collectable figurines and lawn ornaments within a week of opening. And don't think I just made that up. I've been in that store. It's a combination gas station and crapmart. Possibly the most disturbing place I've ever seen.

  75. There are currently 78 FTTH communities in the US by ewirt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is becoming more and more frequent in new master-planned developments. The "FTTH Council" currenty lists 78 communities and municipalities that are already providing FTTH service. You can grab the list from the FTTH Council here.There are many other communities that are not on this list yet because service hasn't actually been turned on.

    Having Cat5 home run from several rooms to a central panel has slowly become the standard for new homes in many areas. I began forcing this on our builders about 4 years ago. As someone else pointed out, builders are very conservative... but if you can show them that it will only take $500 more than they currently pay and that they HAVE to do it because all of the other builders are doing it, then they'll fall in line with only a little grumbling. Of course this is really only possible withing certain price ranges. Most of the homes in our developments are $250k and up.

    The "Community Intranets" are also fairly common in larger communities. They range from small sites that the developer hires a high-school kid to put together, to specific sites built from "intranet packages" that are tailored for large developments. Examples of vendors include Neighborware and Resident Interactive.

    ~
    I hate mornings.

  76. REQUIRED data wiring??? by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Most geeks seem to forget that there are these rules known as "building codes" that regulate how houses are built and just what type of material is required.

    Good luck getting THAT requirement inserted into local building codes. Most of these codes derive from what is known as the International Building Code (IBC). The electricity and wiring usually derives (in America) from the National Electric Code (NEC)... ...but not always... and municipalities love to change their codes on a yearly basis. Moral: let your general contractor deal with this because you WILL get it wrong if you do it yourself. Not a big deal... until an inspector fails your new construction and you have to rip out a bunch of drywall to get your wiring up to code (true also for >60% renovation).

    Speaking of which... when you do have your new construction/renovation wired, be sure that your wiring is to code (plenum rated cable if appropriate, no drilling through fire breaks, no sharing conduits with romex, that sort of thing).

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  77. I have 100Mb Fire to my brain by mrgrumpy · · Score: 1

    I live in a new apartment block (lovingly called a Mansion) in Fukuoka, Japan. Having being built less than a year ago I'm luckly to have NTT fibre to the building, and network ports in my apartment running at 100Mb. Okay, so I might not get LAN speeds, but it's the fastest I've seen since being at Uni. But the best part, it costs about USD$10 a month, unlimited.

    --
    -- Huh, what?
  78. Last mile coax please :) by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Fiber channel? Waaay too expensive. But I got a nice coax cable, up to 1 gigabit if they want to deliver that. What is the max? 180m cable or so without repeater? Should be quite enough for a reasonably sized apartment block. Kinda like all the student condos here are usually wired with, 10/100Mbit internally

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  79. And in your CC and Rs... by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    There will probally be a stipulation that you can only run Windows ;)

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  80. Sounds like Heaven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Heaven.

    How few is 'very few' and how many is 'not many'?

  81. Warning: Obscure Simpsons Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say Scorpio?

    Oh wait. Bill Gates isn't that charismatic.

  82. Re:Check out the picture of that couple ... by 72beetle · · Score: 1

    Best In Show was a great movie - you oughta credit your quotes so more people can be exposed to this little-known film.

    The best part, however, is in the extra scenes on the dvd where the Pinenut guy is showing off his cabin full of beach balls.

    -72

    --
    -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
  83. Doesn't eat into Builder's Margins by JohnDenver · · Score: 1

    A new 2000-2500 square foot house on a half acre costs about 150-200k here. Tack on a grand or even $500 for just 10 base T wiring, which is a feature that most people will not use, really eats into your margins as a builder. Why do it?

    In many sub-urban areas (Especially here in North NJ), there is a large demand for the ultimate community home with all the ammenities. Despite the recession, there are still a lot of people who are willing to pay premium money to live in a community with everything.

    In other words, it doesn't eat into the builder's margins. They make it up, and then some, by charging people willing to pay for it.

    You have to remember there is an entire (growing) demographic willing to drop thousands of dollars in exclusive fashion. Even practical people are buying into the active community with all the ammenities and are paying premium $ for the priveledge.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  84. I'm sorry... by JohnDenver · · Score: 1

    I didn't read your entire post that closely. You made it clear you understood my points, before I even made them. I really hate to be condescending/patronizing, and it wasn't warrented here.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  85. Wish there were more like this. by neowolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just bought a new house in a new community and was so excited because the whole thing is wired for network, cable, satellite, and phone. The bad news is there was no broadband Internet available. I had a great in-home network that didn't go anywhere.

    Just in the last month, we finally were able to get DSL service. Before that, the only option was to get microwave service from a local wireless provider with $500 in up-front equipment charges and about $60/Month for use.

    I really wish all new developments would include broadband Internet in some form. I don't feel it would be that big of a deal to buy a few T1s (or better) and provide broadband to everyone in the community. They could just figure the costs into the HOA dues.

  86. Clearing up a few issues by dbaker · · Score: 1

    I'm the head of technology for a company that provides connectivity and management solutions to telcos/cable cos that are providing these sorts of services to neighborhoods and can clear up a handful of the issues that have come up here.

    A lot of the benefit in these fiber deployments is the technology and ability to scale for the telco, so it's not just that everything else is equal except it's faster to the consumer. Accordingly, there's no need to have an OC12 or anything to realize the benefit of fiber installations in a community. In lots of cases, telcos which to provide a superior solution to the consumer/homeowner but still feel like they shouldn't be overly ahead of the competition (DSL, cable, etc), so speed is limited below 10Mbps. In many installations, although the hardware will ultimately scale up, the consumers are currently only receiving 10Mbps half-duplex ethernet to their router. Given the incredible scale and management issues of fiber installations to cable cos and telcos, it's not true that there's no incentive to build fiber into new developments.

    Additionally, even if you were giving everyone 100Mbps full duplex to the home, it's not like it's going to require 100Mbps * [number of consumers] upstream bandwidth. 99% of people are still just hitting cnn.com, weather.com, etc. These fiber installations are less common in urban areas, too, so the population is generally older and less likely to be, say, Bearsharing. Given the cost of overbuilding (as opposed to new construction), there's not a huge motivation to upgrade from traditional copper to fiber at this point in urban areas or inside cities.

    There are two main technologies right now -- FTTC (Fiber To the Curb) and FTTH (Fiber To The Home). With FTTC, most installations have fiber running to an optical unit in someone's front yard and eight people share that connection. With FTTH, there's a box outside everyone's home and the fiber is individually run to them. The huge advantage of FTTH is that there's limited overhead to a deployment until the homeowner moves in. With FTTC, you have to throw all your money down as soon as the first of eight (or whatever the hardware supports) potential customers moves in.

    I disagree that residential services are not where the money is. It entirely depends on the overhead and your pricing structure, of course, but the statement just isn't true that you need to target businesses or apartments.

    There's no reason why you should feel like a pre-wired house is lame because it won't meet your expectations. My experience has been that the telco/cable operator schedules a meeting with the new homeowner a week or so before they plan to move into the house. They go through with the homeowner and decide where they wish to have ethernet/phone/cable/etc jacks throughout the house. Additionally, most homes have a little hatch in the laundry room that's sized to fit a router, hub, etc. The cable techs are getting pretty clued and offer advice to homeowners on how to wire things, where they could put APs, etc. It's totally customized and there's no reason to think that you wouldn't be satisfied. After all, they just do what you tell them to and it's profesionally installed.

    I don't see why security is an issue in a way that it isn't for DSL/Cable/etc. To the consumer, FTTH/FTTC (fiber to the home / fiber to the curb) installations are just the same as cable/dsl/etc. It's not like you just plug into Ethernet and you're on a subnet with a million other windows machines discovering domains and workgroups, etc. Everyone's connection is separate, it's all switched, there's no easy way to packet sniff, there's no fighting for bandwidth, and some communities even use PPPoE. Additionally, with most homes having more than one computer, practically everyone has a router in the little hatch in the laundry room.

    Overall, it's a really great technology and getting better. I'm pretty jealous to not have our service at my home. We have thousands of homeowners online with the majority being FTTC in neighborhoods that we've had online for over two years, and FTTH being newer and those homes in the minority.

  87. forget it! by hangingonwords · · Score: 1

    skip the wires to my house and go straight for the brain! STRAIGHT FOR MY BRAIN!!!

    --
    fact: microsoft > linux
  88. Segments, Options, and Links for SOHO LAN by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    How much is a pre-wired house worth to you? Nothing, there are many less troublesome, relative easy to implement, and low cost options.

    What will this do for community building? The last mile is not in the interest of the telco's to implement. Telcos' control of the customer will be marginalized (maybe lost) by providing ATM-VPC, VPN, VoIP, .... However, if the third link concept (listed below, Airship) ever takes-off, then the last mile problem will quickly end in many locations.

    Possible Solutions (what wire/cable are y'all talking about? Is there a problem in the house?:~):

    14Mb/s Apartment/Condo linked to switched-hub to Switch in basement/attic.

    http://www.homeplug.org/index_basic.html

    11Mb/s Home/Apartment/Condo W-LAN (low power) linked to HomePlug Access point.

    http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/main.html#Tu torial

    Last Mile Connection to the internet/intranet/... is comming.

    http://www.airship.com/prod/uses_telecoms_frames.h tm

    OldHawk777

    Reality is a self-induced hallucination.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  89. for once something happens in issaquah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This place is a little tiny town that closes up at 9pm, and doesn't open until 10-11am. Closed Sundays.

    It does have some nice houses, and apparently a decent school system, but most people who live here are yuppies from hell.

    Unfortunately, the Highlands is one of the common poor quality high expense communities that are all over the place here. Still, if it is anywhere as good as it sounds, maybe I'll turn into a yuppie myself :D

  90. Re:Interesting... [Provo FTTH] by bonnyman · · Score: 1

    At a meeting in Provo this month of municipal utilities either already building FTTH networks or considering doing so, it was pointed out by more than one attendee that apartment building owners in fact became very interested in having their buildings wired with fiber first (before competing apartment complexes). This was once FTTH became a real offering in their area.