Slashdot Mirror


TCP/IP Header Bit Added to Improve Security

J0e 1337 wrote in to tell us about a recent development in the TCP/IP header RFC. He says "According to the just-released RFC, conveniently labeled number 3514 for easy rememberance, a new bit will be added to enhance security. This new evil bit will make it possible to route based on the evil status of any given packet. It's about TIme!!" You might want to read A Related Slashdot Story in order to more fully understand the scope of this exciting new RFC.

325 comments

  1. FP! by MeanMF · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fifth Post!

    1. Re:FP! by i4u · · Score: 1

      funny or not funny, thats the question.

    2. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First reply!

    3. Re:FP! by timerider · · Score: 1

      is not.

      at least, not anymore after the umpteenth mentioning on /.

      bye,
      [L]

    4. Re:FP! by MeanMF · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was sooo not off-topic..

    5. Re:FP! by Clomer · · Score: 1

      Fifth Post!

      Whoever moderated that to off topic totally didn't get it...

      --
      Intelligent responses welcome, flames will be met with marshmallows.
    6. Re:FP! by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 3, Funny

      In soviet russia you fool april.
      Goddamnit, its fifth post for cryst's sake, I should be legally entitled to be offtopic, redundant, troll and not get modded down.
      And even if you mod me down, i'll recover my karma by posting something funny in the 6th dupe.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    7. Re:FP! by Sexy+Commando · · Score: 1

      Funny Post!

    8. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And unless you're a malodorous, long-haired, socially crippled, corpulent, acne-scarred loser who knows more about kernels than the opposite sex you didn't think the story was funny the first time!

    9. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Henry the 8th I am,
      Henry the 8th I am I am,
      I got married to the widow next door,
      She's been married seven times before.

      And every one was an Henry, 'enry!
      Wouldn't have a Willy or Sam, (not a Sam!)
      I'm her eigth old man I'm Henry,
      Henry the eighth I am.

      Second verse, same as the first.

    10. Re:FP! by KilerCris · · Score: 1

      I suppose it makes sence to post the one real story today 5 times...

    11. Re:FP! by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      With all the dupes, you'd think CmdrTaco wrote the RFC too.

    12. Re:FP! by drummerboy714 · · Score: 1

      Hey, some of us non-MSCE or CCNE-types don't know any better, and the more it's repeated, the more we learn! Sure hopes he tries this with some article about Microsoft security. Patch management couldn't be any better than what exists now.

    13. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some dumb editor isn't capable of reading what was posted in the past. Never mind the fact that he is the one that posted in the past. Ohh well I guess that goes to the creditabitly of Taco

    14. Re:FP! by infodragon · · Score: 1

      All because Tacho couldn't resist a dare...

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
  2. come on now by thadeusPawlickiROX · · Score: 1

    The first time i chuckled, the second time i growned... the past three times I wonder what the ed's are doing! Come on now, enough already ;-)

    --
    take off every sig for great justice
    1. Re:come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the second time i growned..

      It's about time you growned up, young man!

    2. Re:come on now by MattCohn.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's quite obvious that the server didn't get slashdotted the first time, so they are using april 1st as an excuse to try and try again (and again and again)...

    3. Re:come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite obvious that the server didn't get slashdotted the first time, so they are using april 1st as an excuse to try and try again (and again and again)...

      That means CmdrTaco is inciting DoS. Someone please report him to www.nipr.gov....

    4. Re:come on now by levik · · Score: 1
      Ah... But imagine a Beowulf cluster of these stories?

      --
      Ñ'
    5. Re:come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, a Beowulf cluster of these stories imagines you.

  3. Sigh... by insecuritiez · · Score: 1

    They arn't tired of this one yet? I am.

  4. Please, for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Stop it. Stop it now. Post something funny like this.

    1. Re:Please, for the love of god by TeknoDragon · · Score: 1

      hmm... almost funny

    2. Re:Please, for the love of god by randyest · · Score: 1

      It's standards-compliance also sucks.

      Might have been funny, if you could have gotten the grammar close to right. Thank you for playing. Lose the apostrophe and the hyphen, then please insert coin and try again.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Please, for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complaining about grammar on Slashdot? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

    4. Re:Please, for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, an April Fools joke about Microsoft dumping their own technology in favor of an open alternative! I've never seen that before.

    5. Re:Please, for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's punctuation, not grammar, sponge-for-brains.

  5. Ha. Hoo. Hee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So. Funny. Knee Slapper. Sides Aching.

  6. Someone... by Exitthree · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...needs to mark Taco's new articles with the Evil Bit to cut down on dupes...

    1. Re:Someone... by DShard · · Score: 1

      I relized after reading the article for the fifth time... It could work. Of course I just downed a handful of pills in the drawer that the last cube drone left when he did. Since when is slashdot so colorful?

    2. Re:Someone... by mu_wtfo · · Score: 1

      from the for-the-love-of-god-PLEASE-STOP! dept.

      --
      If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
  7. A very subtle April 1st on Slashdot by mr.henry · · Score: 1
    Now, which ones are the fake stories?

    How many more TCP/IP header stories before bedtime tonight?

    1. Re:A very subtle April 1st on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should always wonder that on /., not just on April 1st.

    2. Re:A very subtle April 1st on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first and third /. releases of the IPv4 extra bit are false, the second and fourth are true, and factcheckers are still working on the fifth release.

      This just in: New changes announced to IPv4....

    3. Re:A very subtle April 1st on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, are you on crack? They are all false. There's no evil bit in IPv4.

  8. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many times are we going to dupe this one?

  9. Agugugughhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tripe! Or Triple, or quadruple, or whatever...

  10. wow. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's your hookup, Rob, and can I get some of what he's getting you?

    I know they talk about short-term memory loss, but this is out of hand.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:wow. by swv3752 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you feel your hair rustle when the joke flew over your head?

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:wow. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're looking at this from the wrong perspective!

      I think it more than likely has got something to do with Taco genuinely LOATHING the admin of rfc-editor.org and thus wants to drive him into financial despair by slashdotting his site five time over...











      ... or something else.

    3. Re:wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er..what joke? This is like the 4th time... please enlighten us, oh wise one.

    4. Re:wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's the fifth time. That is the joke. Taco is (attempting to) make fun of himself and his nasty habit of posting dupes.

      Nobody actually claimed that it was funny.

    5. Re:wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TCP/IP header articles are all true. Everything other article is a joke. Taco's a genious!

    6. Re:wow. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
      That this is "+5 Funny" proves I'm clearly out of my league in terms of Slashdot Humor(TM).

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    7. Re:wow. by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      That big blank space... I selected it just to make sure you hadn't included a whitespace virus ;)

    8. Re:wow. by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Heh, You and me both. Your comment was funnier. :)

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  11. Enjoy the comedy by shazbotus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hey man, its April Fools Day, take it all in and enjoy it. We need it nowadays more than ever.

    1. Re:Enjoy the comedy by Brad+Mace · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for Taco actually linking back to the first four posts, I'd have my doubts about this being intentional.

  12. 2nd by bwhaley · · Score: 1

    w00t, 2nd post, 5th dupe :)

    --
    "I either want less corruption, or more chance
    to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    1. Re:2nd by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Each of the 5 bits that have been added is slightly different, due to differing views on good and evil.

      bit 1 - definately evil (contains pictures of dead babies being eaten by a man covered in feces)
      bit 2 - mostly evil (internal microsoft memo)
      bit 3 - pretty evil (download of a vi clone)
      bit 4 - kinda evil (how to enlarge your penis)
      bit 5 - just mischevious (b00bies)

      This allows administrators a fine grained ability to block packets.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:2nd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't call it dupe (duplicate) anymore, it should be quin (quintuplet) :)) hehe

    3. Re:2nd by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this actually give them 32 (2^5) different levels of good an evil? Perhaps it's a value on a scale from image with emeded al-qaida communication to barney. er... that's not right. Perhaps it's barney to lynx http request.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:2nd by CoolQ · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, what's wrong with "pictures of dead babies being eaten by a man covered in feces"? That's not evil, that's what keeps our Net alive!

    5. Re:2nd by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Well what if you have a packet that's part of a vi clone with b00bies that will enlarge your penis? Or an internal Microsoft memo that contains pictures of dead babies being eaten by a man covered in feces?

      Internet protocols have to be flexible, you know.

    6. Re:2nd by addaon · · Score: 1

      As long as they're ripe, right?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    7. Re:2nd by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      Who are you, and how did you get those pictures?

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    8. Re:2nd by g1t>>v · · Score: 1

      Maybe, one day, they'll implement a bit that indicates triple, quadruple, quintuple posts ... Sigh.

  13. I Feel Dirty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually laughed... again

  14. Hrmmm by Judg3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Taco is trying to tell us something, but for the love of me I don't know what it is.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:Hrmmm by vano2001 · · Score: 1

      He is trying to inform us that he wants today changed to.... April tortures' day

    2. Re:Hrmmm by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
      I think Taco is trying to tell us something, but for the love of me I don't know what it is.

      "Hey Taco! what is it, boy? What? Little Timmy got arrested for downloading music because the FBI was illegally wiretapping his internet connection, but it's not really illegal because some congressment conspired to pass legislation by Disney, that makes it legal? Good Slashdot Editor! Lead the way, boy!"

      Seriously though, this is pretty lame after about repost #3- we get the idea. What would have been MUCH funnier would have been an announcement that Jon Katz was back on staff as an editor, adding his own two dollars to every story before it was posted.

    3. Re:Hrmmm by debrain · · Score: 1

      I believe the expression is "for the love of God ", not "for the love of me ". Unless you are God, in which case, Hi God, I beg your pardon, and thanks for the babel fish.

  15. What would you call this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A quint?

    Maybe Taco has gone too far this time...Quintuplets

  16. And some people *pay* for this?? by WD · · Score: 5, Funny

    It sure looks like the Slashdot subscribers are getting their money's worth!

    1. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this dupe in the FUTURE! It was awesome, there are like FIVE MORE yet to come!!!

    2. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Sweepstakes time, I think. There are still a few hours to go in /.'s home time zone. How many more times can we expect to see this story?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by nacs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is moderated +5 Funny but it really should be "Insightful". I would donate to this site just as I have for many other sites if it weren't for the sheer idiocy that is sometimes displayed by the editors here.

      This was funny the first couple times but now it's just pathetic.

      --
      "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
    4. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by PipianJ · · Score: 1

      But subscribers get exclusive/early stories... Does this mean they have another 50 different versions of this story on their page? Man, I feel gypped.

    5. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by grinwell · · Score: 1

      This has been an existential exercise as the complaints about the story being dupes are getting repetitive and even the jokes are being recycled.

      The admins must be recognizing that they can generate the same amount of traffic and comments with a repeat story as with new content. Soon, they will follow the path of TV executives and only run new content during critical Internet "Sweeps" periods where demographics are counted twice.

    6. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by garcia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm not laughing.

      You have paid for a total of 2000 pages and so far 1974 have been used up (3 today).

      I want ALL pages returned to me for today. There is absolutely no reason I should have to pay to support utter garbage.

      I have been fucking annoyed w/the april fools shit for years. This year it has gotten just downright stupid.

      Taco, I am not kidding. Give me back the fucking page loads or you won't be getting money from me again.

    7. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      and even the jokes are being recycled.

      In Soviet Russia...

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    8. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Kibo · · Score: 1

      Hey, now that Katz isn't around anymore the rest of them have to pick up the slack. Today, Taco's name came outta the hat. But I think we should cut 'em a little slack. The joke isn't any *more* beat to death than a "you like-a the juice-a" sketch in the last half hour of SNL. ... Yet.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    9. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Desmeso · · Score: 1

      I'm not laughing
      Oh big surprise there.

      So, how's it feel to be a moron?

      I'm so sick and tired of the whiney crybabies every year on this day. This is what you idiots sound like:

      "Slashdot is for me alone. Since I think way too highly of myself, I will bitch and moan if someone does anything I do not like."

      I can see from your previous posts that you are pretty much like this every day. I feel sorry for your family.

      Back to the point at hand, you paid for 2000 pages. That's 2000 pages. Just in case you don't understand, 2000 pages, not 2000 pages that meet the standards of "Bill". What's next? Refunds for regular stories you did not find appropriate? Get real pal. You paid for it, you got it. The editors do what they want, and people enjoy it. If you don't like it, go pollute some other news site.

    10. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by garcia · · Score: 1

      yup, I have been the same for the many years I have been on this site.

      I have sat through more fucking assholes like yourself.

      You will come and go. I will not.

    11. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Funny

      You will come and go. I will not.

      Couldn't you, though, just for one day?

      Oh, I don't know. How about April 1? Sounds like a good time to take a vacation from /. for you. ;)

    12. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Desmeso · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, you're the one throwing a temper tantrum and making jocular demands, and I'M the asshole.

      Someone moderate that last one to +1 Smart.

      I would have thought you could have come up with something more intelligent, but... ooohh.. right.

      Seeya around Billy!

    13. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by mosch · · Score: 1
      If you've been annoyed for years then you knew not to visit today. It's not their your fault you decided to dislike today's content.

      Shut the fuck up you goddamned pissant whiner.

    14. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You will come and go. I will not.

      Well, since you obviously "will not be going", just shut the hell up. Some people enjoy the April fools day jokes, and ARE happy to pay for them. If you don't want to pay for the "pages", don't visit April 1.

    15. Re:And some people *pay* for this?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, as a paying customer he will not tolerate it. Just as a paying customer for CDs most people will not tolerate the RIAA.

      You people are quick to forget.

      Fucking assholes.

  17. Finally... by DShard · · Score: 1

    a story with something new to say.

  18. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about time I was able to filter packets based on intention of said packet.

    I wonder if anyone else has heard about this?

  19. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that dupes appear EVERY DAY on /. lessens the impact of this April 1st 'joke'.

  20. Bastaaaaaaa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, how many iterations of this fool we'll have to go through? Is it midnight yet?

  21. WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so cool! Why haven't I heard about it before? You'd think something this important would be all over slashdot.

  22. New /. Slogan by dark-br · · Score: 5, Funny

    News for the amnesiac. Stuff that mattered.

    1. Re:New /. Slogan by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did I tell you about this "evil" bit already? Sorry about that. See, I've got this condition....

  23. Wow... by c0dedude · · Score: 1

    In case you missed it the first few times... Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it's another dupe!

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  24. *slaps forehead* by Yorrike · · Score: 0, Troll

    Enough! It's not getting any funnier! Now you're just looking desperate and sad.

    --

    Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    1. Re:*slaps forehead* by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      Desperate and sad, you mean like when every other Slashdorker posts "hey, this story is a dupe" when someone makes a mistake?

      The kettle and the pot called. They want their shit back.

      -/-

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    2. Re:*slaps forehead* by mick2275 · · Score: 1


      It's getting a little funnier.

      --
      Can I bum a .sig off ya?
    3. Re:*slaps forehead* by Tattva · · Score: 1
      It's getting a little funnier.

      It'll get a little less funny, and then it'll come back in a big way around the 10th dupe.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  25. 4th dupe today by sheetsda · · Score: 1

    I'd like to say that's a record, but you know how things are around here. :)

    1. Re:4th dupe today by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      A record? I'd say a broken record :)

  26. Seething ... Hatred. by themassiah · · Score: 1

    I believe Ricardo Montalban said it best. I paraphrase. "TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACO!"

    --
    - Sometimes you're the pidgeon, sometimes you're the statue.
    1. Re:Seething ... Hatred. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, that was James T.

      Kahn just sat listened, sat back, smiling pleasantly.

    2. Re:Seething ... Hatred. by randyest · · Score: 1

      pidgeon? I don't get it. What's a pidgeon?

      --
      everything in moderation
  27. Sort of like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For Taco this must be sort of be like kicking over an anthill and watching all the angry ants swarm around looking for something to attack.

  28. This is just Cruel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Taco harbours some deep down resentment to those people who point out his duplicate new postings. I guess we can let him have one day a year to vent :)

    Then again it's easier to call him a nut and go read.. go read... go read... umm... Maybe there isn't really an alternative...

  29. Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    # 2003-04-01 19:36:47 New RFC solves security problems (articles,security) (rejected)

    1. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you find reject notices? I've submitted a few articles over the years and just figure that the only way you find out they're rejected is if they don't show up.

  30. Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today these...

    FP!!!
    BSD IS DYING!!!
    IN SOVIET RUSSIA, Tcp/IP adds a header to you!!! ...are better than the articles.

  31. suggestion to alternate with pigeon tcp story by i4u · · Score: 1

    One of the Internet's most obscure technologies came to life last weekend: transmitting network information by carrier pigeon.
    http://news.com.com/2100-1001-257064.html

  32. It's a... by Muerte23 · · Score: 1

    dupe...
    tripe...
    qupe...
    QUIPE!!!

    1. Re:It's a... by TheKodiak · · Score: 1

      Should have stopped at "tripe."

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    2. Re:It's a... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quipes your enquish is tewible.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:It's a... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Quip. As in joke ;-)

      Happy april fools day! ;-)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    4. Re:It's a... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "dupe...
      tripe...
      qupe...
      QUIPE!!!"


      Is pupe next?

  33. This is old by ChicoLance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been subscribed to Slashdot since the option became available, and I check this site all of the time.

    But *five* times! This really isn't funny, and it holding back from any ligitamate news stories.

    Should I be regretting my subscription money?

    --Lance

    1. Re:This is old by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Yes, the $5 you spent is right down the tube because of some single day foolishness. I suggest you sue.

    2. Re:This is old by ChicoLance · · Score: 1

      It's not the amount that's at issue, but the fact that I'm supporting this. The one comments I've heard around the hallways here after the third, fourth, and now fifth story is, "I'm glad I'm not a subscriber."

      At least around me, this line of posts is pissing more people off -- including me -- than it is helping the site by some sort of odd humor.

      --Lance

    3. Re:This is old by ah.clem · · Score: 1

      Should I be regretting my subscription money?

      Yeah, you should. Send me your password and I'll see what I can do about getting it back for ya.

      ah.clem

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    4. Re:This is old by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I'm a subscriber and I think it's hilarious. It's one day a year. Big deal. Hell, I think all the people whining is actually funnier than the repeated story.

    5. Re:This is old by emarkp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I think it's so funny that as a non-subscriber it's one more argument against subscribing. Unless of course the subscribers don't lose any credits on April 1.

    6. Re:This is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word, Yes.

      This is just plain idiotic.

    7. Re:This is old by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Oh lighten up this is april fools man! Come on, you spent what 5 bucks? So did I and I cracked up seeing this story for the fifth time.

      What better way to poke fun of himself by posting a story 5 times?

      Lighten up and have a laugh - it will do you good.

    8. Re:This is old by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been subscribed to Slashdot since the option became available, and I check this site all of the time.

      But *five* times! This really isn't funny, and it holding back from any ligitamate news stories.

      Should I be regretting my subscription money?


      Jesus christ, where did all these whiny little fucking brats come from? What a meager threat. I hope you do neglect to spend your $5 on a slashdot subscription in the future so I don't need to see you nailing yourself to a fucking cross on april fucking fools day. Actually, why don't you stop visiting all together so that this kind of crap doesn't hold back from any legitimate comments.

      I've also been subscribed to slashdot since the availibility of the option, and I intend to keep it despite any bad jokes by Taco. I think it's kind of ironic anyway, being that Taco is doing this because of all the whining and complaining people chuck at him about dupes.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    9. Re:This is old by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Should I be regretting my subscription money?
      4/1 dumbness is part of what you signed up for. It's always like this. One year it was kinda funny, but it's usually lame.

      If you want to enjoy Slashdot, then don't read it on 4/1. Or maybe cruise the journals.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    10. Re:This is old by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      It's not the amount that's at issue, but the fact that I'm supporting this.
      The beauty of Slashdot subscriptions is that you support by clicking, by looking at pages without ads. If Slashdot is boring on a certain day, then you stop reading and stop clicking -- and stop supporting. I can easily imagine someone loading the front page, seeing that it's just 4/1 stuff, and then surfing on to somewhere else. Total cost: half a penny.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    11. Re:This is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot

    12. Re:This is old by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      You already decided to vote with your dollars. 4/1 shenanigans is a staple of the Slashdot community. So, 1.37 cents of your dollar-votes went towards supporting April Fool's Day this year. I hope that eventually you can accept that you got something of equal or greater value than what you paid for.

      And I also hope that, like the other whiners out there, you get a fucking clue.

    13. Re:This is old by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for you, there isn't any legitimate news today, so having this story posted five times isn't holding you back from any.

    14. Re:This is old by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

      Off hand, I think I'm going to kick in another $10 into the pool. ;-)

      Seeing all these whiners is the most fun I've had all day. If they don't want to see the Dupes today, then Cmdr Taco (Hallowed be his nick) is certainly NOT twisting their fingers to type in www.slashdot.org into their browswer windows....

      BTW: It is MORE funny the fifth time. He's just poking fun at himself for all the other dupes during the year.

    15. Re:This is old by randyest · · Score: 1

      I think it's so funnny that I'm going to subscribe now. I want to encourage this. It cracks me up.

      You're too serious and angry; just ignore them, dammit, if it makes you need to up your dosage. "It" not "holding back from any ligitamate news stories" because there aren't any, and it's just 4/1, so STFU. Or, keep going; you're funny too. I love seeing people get angry and indignant over trivialities.

      --
      everything in moderation
  34. This is for real! by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1

    The other four evil bit articles were just to throw us off.

  35. How can I... by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    mod the story down?

  36. The Mother Of All Dupes by mrsam · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This has to be a troll. It's one thing having dupes posted by different editors, it's quite something else when you have a dupe posted by the same editor.

    The last dupe was also Taco's. Either this is a marvelous troll, or Rusty's right.

  37. I'm going to shoot myself in the head. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it. I'm fucking done. My blood is on your hands Taco.

  38. CmdrTaco's Packets by Patrick+Cable+II · · Score: 1

    Will all of CmdrTaco's packets have the "evil" bit set to 1, beacuse the data they contain may lead to short term memory loss?

    It's funny(or horribly cheesy, either way), laugh

    Patrick

  39. Third Story by webmaestro · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Is this the third story about this RFC today, come on, thats just pathetic.

    1. Re:Third Story by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      Dude! Get with the picture! It's the fifth!

    2. Re:Third Story by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      it's so cute, the trolls don't know how to count. *5* posts on this. Taco even pointed out the other 4.

    3. Re:Third Story by webmaestro · · Score: 1

      Sorry, don't have time to count every time a story is posted. I have better stuff to do.

  40. this is kind of lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at this rate they'll set (or already set?) a dupe record. The lameness being that it's intentional duping .. I wonder what the record for unintentional duping is.

  41. stucking fupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this stopped being funny about the second time around. now it's just fucking stupid.

  42. forgetting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder all the incompatible versions of *linux sucks. Clueless people keep forgetting that BSD has already done all these things long before and there's no need to reinvent the wheel.

  43. Can we say repeat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So, you said we should check our own website to make sure no one else has posted a repeat story? Blasphemy! Repeats are a fact of life. Buck Up!"

    Maybe there is something to be learned here. Perhaps slashcode could use a redundancy checker that scans the latest 15 posted articles or whatever for similar context or links to try to determine if some sucker is getting ready to make a fool of themselves.

    Oh well. We all suck anyway.

  44. Dupe dupe dupe... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has Taco ever duped himself before? methinks we are seeing slashdot history made here....

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  45. the David Letterman school of comedy by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    just repeat the same joke over and over,until its funny.

    Personally, I think doing this all day is funny, especially since that is the joke.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by gailwynand · · Score: 1

      Hey, uh - you got any gum?

      Something from the meatcase, Linda?

      Let me tell you how brazen the rats are...

      --
      A pilot, in those days, was the only unfettered and entirely independent human being that lived in the earth.-Mark Twain
    2. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by Jezral · · Score: 1

      Agreed...people still think it's just another dupe, when the whole plot is to make fun of dupes, using even more dupes.

      Of course, he could just be posting it once per timezone to make sure everyone gets it when it's their April 1st.

      -- Tino Didriksen / ProjectJJ.dk

    3. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      From the branch office in Holland, Michigan...

    4. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by Target+Drone · · Score: 1
      Personally, I think doing this all day is funny, especially since that is the joke

      Just wait till tomorrow when everything is back to normal and they start posting dupes of the previous days stories.

    5. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we left the school of Letterman for Carrot Top University some several stories back.

    6. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by GRH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Any of you guys remember the "rake gag" on the Simpsons? (oh, make that The Thompsons [sorry to blow your cover, Homer])

      It went through the same progression:
      2nd rake (dupe): funny,
      3rd, 4th, 5th rake: dumb
      6th-20th rake: hilarious!

      If this keeps up, I'm going to gotten the square root of fsck-all done today!

      GRH

    7. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in my PANTS!!!

    8. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by njchick · · Score: 1
      The problem is, nobody seems to get it. That RFC is not just humor, it's satire. Dividing packets into "evil" and "benign" is clearly a reference to the "axis of evil" and to the contemporary policy of the United States of America in general. Dividing the world into "good guys" and "bad guys" and exterminating the later is not going to make the world a better place to live, just live marking IP packets as evil and filtering out the later is not going to make Internet more secure.

      Morale of the story: naive moral approach to complex problems, whether technical or political is not going to work.

    9. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Mock the technique all you want, but it can be surprisingly effective.

      Here's how a friend explained it to me. "When you find something funny, it's often funny a second time. So do it again. Now, by the third time, it gets a little irritating, but it's still kind of funny. By the fourth time, people are going to start rolling their eyes, and that's when a lesser comedian than myself might lose their nerve and stop. Don't do it. Just keep hammering away at it, and you'll be surprised how often it blows right across that 'not funny' line and starts being funny from the other direction."

      Weird fella, but he makes it work.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    10. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by aafiske · · Score: 1

      Actually I think it was Mark Twain who said that any statement, repeated earnestly at least five or six times, will become funny. In fact I'm sure he said it, but I can't find the exact quote. In any case, you're right, David Letterman is certainly subscriber to this school of thought. (if it can be called such.)

      I think it's kind of funny too, but I probably don't count. :)

    11. Re:the David Letterman school of comedy by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      The problem is, nobody seems to get it. [excessive overanalysis skipped]

      You need to get out more.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  46. Not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is trolling...their own website! I don't care about April Fool's day, Slashdot has no credibility :(

  47. Yes, fans, we have ... by mr_death · · Score: 1

    Jesus H Christ, a quadruplicate posting.

    Either slashdot is serving up some mighty fine drugs this April Fools day, or someone needs to fix their cranial-rectal inversion.

    --
    It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
  48. You're catching on... by clambake · · Score: 1

    So, one more and we have : HYPE! Exactly how marketing works.

  49. Pure Evil by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    I checked the packets that brought this story to me and you guessed it they are EVIL. I'm going to the local Christian Bookstore to buy some holy firewall software, I'm then going to ask my priest to bless it. That will stop the EVIL packets from corrupting my computer.

    1. Re:Pure Evil by youBastrd · · Score: 1

      no no no, a priest can't bless anything. Drop a bottle of water on a co-aligned altar, pray to your god, if you're in good favour with him/her/it/they, and the water will become blessed. *Then* dip your precious electronic equipment in the blessed water.

      Jeez, some people are just strange...

      --
      No one has ever fired for blaming Microsoft.
    2. Re:Pure Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hate Christians so much? Release your hate and try to love a little more. It will do your soul good.

    3. Re:Pure Evil by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 1

      I'm Christian. If you can't laugh at yourself, then whats the point?

    4. Re:Pure Evil by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      I bet they came from a Unix machine, I hear they have demons.

    5. Re:Pure Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't mean to get technical but for those of you unfamiliar with RFC 3514, part of the processing of packets includes a probability check to distinguish faulty intrusion detection systems from robust ones..

      The president's technology advisory board is already working on legislation which will enable faith-based software security services such as faith-based intrusion detection systems and firewalls to have sole access to 0.0 false positive probabilities when processing good and evil packets. The council released a statement praising the utility of the newly defined bit field. The press release also praised the one true God, saying the new technology is perfectly suited for implementation by faith-based software developers. "we are proud that our president is embracing the traditional values of american network security" the press release said.

      A major faith-based network security software developer who asked not to be identified, emphasized that the newly defined bit field is "just the kind of technological development our field needs." And while their enterprise security software will still tap into the power of prayer, faith, and other traditional forms of faith-based network security technologies, he has high hopes for the future of faith-based security software: "We finally have an administration that recognizes our needs and recognizes that god is all knowing and all seeing, and theres no substitute for that kind of network security."

    6. Re:Pure Evil by evilmrhenry · · Score: 1

      Eh, you don't need to go to so much trouble. Just take some holy water and sprinkle it on your computer.

      The smoke is the sign that the daemons have been destroyed.

  50. Hey. Maybe it's not really Rob? by caferace · · Score: 1
    If I were the enemy (whoever that might be..Iraq, MS, the Kuro5hin) I'd kidnap and replace him with anautomaton secretly.

    Perhaps the stories are just being reposted every time they have to reboot his doppleganger.

  51. AARRG by orpheus2000 · · Score: 1

    My eyes!!! It hurts, please Taco, take the red hot poker out of my eyes!!!! No more!

  52. Note a duplicate ;-) by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Repeat 5 for anyone counting.

    Hey, we should all submit this story again and see how many more times we can get it posted today :^)

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Note a duplicate ;-) by TeknoDragon · · Score: 1

      perhaps they're accepting all submissions of the Evil bit...

    2. Re:Note a duplicate ;-) by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1

      No. Some AC mentioned that his evil bit submission was rejected. My tip if you want to see this duplicated again is: submit some unrelated April Fool's joke stories. The duplicates must have some other articles in-between. (Otherwise it would be too obvious.)

  53. I like where this is going... by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We should all be able to get in a First Post on this topic before the day is over.

    Peter

  54. thanks for the deja voo by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    but it's april fools day, not groundhog day.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  55. God dammit Taco by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Read your own fucking site every now and then. This piece of shit story wasn't very funny the first time it was posted. Or the second. Or the third......

    Mod me down, I got it to burn. Fact is, I'm right. Rude, but right. This is fucking rediculous.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:God dammit Taco by Ageless · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you seriously think he's not noticing this as he does it? It's a giant mistake? You are aware of the date and it's significance right?

    2. Re:God dammit Taco by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Maybe he is aware of everything, and you just fell for his joke? Or perhaps, you are aware that he is aware of the day, and I just fell for you joke?

    3. Re:God dammit Taco by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Incontheevable!

    4. Re:God dammit Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sadly I'm pretty sure he is noticing this.

      And I think it's his pathetic attempt at trying to make light of his past dupes (non-April 1st).

      Taco is just a sad, sad, man.

    5. Re:God dammit Taco by ender81b · · Score: 1

      It's ridiculous all right.

      And freaking hilarious. Lighten up man, it is just one day of the year. Stop getting your panties in a bundle and have a good laugh at the fun he is having. I mean look at you people... this wouldn't even be that funny except for all the people getting themselves into a worked-up fervor over this.

      Man oh man. I hope he posts it again.

    6. Re:God dammit Taco by Daniel · · Score: 1

      Thanks, my head just exploded.

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    7. Re:God dammit Taco by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see it twice more today, then posted a third time around April 15th.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:God dammit Taco by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      This IS /.

      So many posts are dupes.

      Several have been multiple dupes.

      The fact that someone had done one what I had counted as 4 times (maybe 5) is not beyond /.

      If it was on purpose, it wasn't funny really, just lame. Not even amusing. So what does April Fools have to do with it? I can see him duping it on purpose, yea, but $10 says he didn't see it was already duped several other times. You know how I know this? Because he and others dupe all the fucking time. Its pitiful.

      Its APRIL FOOLS day, not BE A LLAMA day. The key is to deceive, in a comical way. I don't see how this applies on either point. Its just lame.

      Besides, I'm tired. I get to overreact once a month for free. I am pretty sure thats in the FAQ somewhere....

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:God dammit Taco by Ageless · · Score: 1

      I believe that the main difference is that all the dupes are by the same guy. You said:

      The key is to deceive, in a comical way.

      And I think he did. I chuckle each time I see another dupe and all the resulting outraged posts. Taco is having one over on us.

    10. Re:God dammit Taco by randyest · · Score: 1

      I smell iocaine powder!

      --
      everything in moderation
    11. Re:God dammit Taco by ender81b · · Score: 1

      that would be excellent.

    12. Re:God dammit Taco by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Hi. Quick tip. You're a dumbass.

    13. Re:God dammit Taco by zCyl · · Score: 1

      but $10 says he didn't see it was already duped several other times

      Good point, maybe that's why he linked to the other 4 copies in his post.

      The key is to deceive, in a comical way.

      Or to prank, or mock. April Fools is a rather flexible holiday.

      There are two cases. One, your day was horribly ruined by Slashdot's annual April Fools celebration. (That would just be sad.) Or two, you like to whine and moan.

      Once a year Slashdot gets to play with its users, and be completely pointless. That's entirely the point of the ritual, they do it just fine, and most of us enjoy it. :)

  56. Taco's redundant bit by CDR1313 · · Score: 1

    Taco's redundant bit must be set. Can someone at ./ unset Taco's redundant bit? If that doesn't work, then just smack him a few times. Works for my dad's TV (the smacking that is).

    --
    Are the voices in my head bothering you?
  57. To all people born today, Happy Anniversary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... hahaha, dude, you're a joke!

  58. Eh? by neurostar · · Score: 4, Funny

    funny or not funny, thats the question.

    Funny to who? I'm sure half of the /. crowd just pissed their pants. It went something like this:

    Loads /. ...

    User: Hey! That story has been on there 5 times!

    Scrolls Down...

    User: Fifth post?!

    Long pause...

    User: HA, HAHAHAA! Fifth Post! Like.. Fifth dupe! HAHAAHAH

    Looks down to see wet pants...

    User: :-/

    User starts to feel bad, then realizes he already is ignored by the women folk...

    Keeps on pissing...

    Continously Reloads /. hoping to see a 15th dupe, so he can get the "FP - Fifteenth Post"

  59. Righteous packet by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    As a Christian, and speaking for God if I may, I request the immediate addition of a "Righteous" packet. How dare they propose a packet for the evil one, and nothing for the righteous!

    I've been descriminated against for far too long. You Americans don't treat us Christians fairly...

  60. OT ... or not! by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    Click here (Not like goats.ex... or whatever that other site is)

    This is why retail products should get an "Evil-bit"... Or some sort of barcode that can be scanned to say "I'm an evil product!"

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  61. The Big Question by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

    Would submitting a story to Taco regarding TCP/IP header bits be good for my karma?

  62. or is it?!!! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    It's like the monster in a horror movie. It just keeps coming back from the dead.

  63. Again. Again - Again ! by valkraider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was going to post something witty, repeated 5 times. But I got this message:

    Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

    Maybe this same filter should apply to stories, eh? Yet I have a ton of "denied" stories that are about actual important, interesting, relevant stuff - with links and resources and everything. I could just make up poop and it would get the front page 5 times!

  64. Obligatory Simpsons reference... by hublan · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that Simpson episode where they "remade" Cape Fear. Cape Feare?

    First few times that Sideshow Bob stepped on the rakes was plenty funny. The next ten wasn't so. But the final fifteen or so were simply hysterical.

    Give Rob a few hours. He'll get there.

    --
    My spoon is too big.
  65. It's official.. by v_1_r_u_5 · · Score: 1

    It's official.. any traffic correspondance with slashdot posts made by CmdrTaco will automatically have the "evil bit" set to 1.

  66. Third time? by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
    Geez, three evil bits... Aren't we going to run out of reserved bits in the ipv4 spec if taco goes on line this?

    I mean, why three times? One bit for evil, one for very evil, and 3 for satan himself?

    Oh well...

  67. Breaking News!: RFC 3514 and Repeat Were In A Boat by PipianJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    RFC 3514 fell out. Who was left in the boat?

  68. OK ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was ok the first time. It was funny the second time. It was stupid the third time and the 4th time it's just *running out of words here* bloody fucking pathetic. I wish there were a way to not see front page posts from certain editors. Taco has just lost all sense of reality and what's funny and what's stupid.

  69. Whoa man.... by Ballresin · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you guys...but I base my day on the stories I read on slashdot. It is a measurement of time for me.

    I was about to go nuts, I thought it was still morning when I saw the same topic more than twice!!!

    I need a vacation.

    --
    I got nothin'.
  70. Taco is an idiot by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

    No one appreciates this april fools shit here. And if you're gonna attempt to make a joke don't try and make it as dry as humanly possible for fucks sake.

    Can we have an option to block out april fools shit?

    1. Re:Taco is an idiot by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you already do: avoid ./ on 4/1

      --
      everything in moderation
  71. And yet another new RFC for April 1st! by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 1

    There's also a new RFC numbered 3514 for this year's April Fool's RFC that proposes a new bit to be added to IPv4 so that script kiddies and naer-do-wells can flag their packets appropriately when performing attacks. The editors of Slashdor are really asleep at the prompt to be overlooking this April 1st story!

  72. These Dubs Must Have the Evil Bit Set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said. :-)

  73. heh, it's funny by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

    They bitch at Taco when the story gets posted over and over, yet everyone who says "this is a dupe" over and over never gets tired of saying it :)

  74. Just wait... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    When Taco offers to FILTER this stuff for subscribers, the cash will be pouring in in DROVES...

  75. At least by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    At least it isn't TCP/IP over Avian Carrier.

    At some point, though, CmdrTaco, you will fall under the auspices of the Patriot Act for stirring up a rebellion. . .

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  76. the Johnny Carson school of comedy by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Three times MAX. EVER. Resist the urge for more.

    Conan follows this rule, but the skits often go more than three.

    Dave is strange now - I can't put my finger on it; he seems to have become a dirty old man of a sort.

  77. #4 and counting... by localghost · · Score: 1

    This is why CmdrTaco is the most active author in the hall of fame. If we assume half his posts are dups, (a conservative estimate) he should be fifth. But instead he chooses to cheat timothy out of the fame and wealth he deserves that comes with being the most active author on slashdot. Shame on you, CmdrTaco.

  78. MAKE IT STOP!!!! by Nikeolis · · Score: 1

    I J-just can't take it a-anymore! Taco, it's sooo cruel, he knows us man, he knows what we're thinking man, Taco is like this warrior poet man straight out of Heart of Darkness, and he's like testing us man, testing us with the dupes man, it's all one hard, cold test man, and he's winning man, hes winning, hahahaheheheheheheheheheheh! I can see the pretty colors now man, 'cause, it's like dupes man, dupes all over the place, he's dupin us with the dupes man, makin us all dupes man DUPES!! GET IT?? DUPES!
    Here come the guys man, with the butterfly nets man, TELL THE WORLD, WE ARE ALL DUPES MAN, THE EVIL BIT IS WINNING!!!
    (Mmmm, Valium...)

  79. Maybe there's some truth to it... by CaptCanuk · · Score: 1

    I mean if Rob keeps posting it maybe there's some truth to it? It's not like a credible linked news source like Slashdot would propogate false information right? I mean maybe Microsoft or some other security concious company requested it's addition. The net would certainly be a better place if everyone sending and packets would just be nice enough to tell you if they were sending a nice packet or mean packet. Sorta like "warm fuzzies" and "cold pricklies"...
    All this talk is making me hungry... I can't wait till my grill gets in!

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  80. Spam by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm somehow reminded of the MP skit.

    SPAM! SPAM! SPAM! SPAM!!

    Except that this time it's:

    RFC EVIL BIT! RFC EVIL BIT! RFC EVIL BIT!

    Just when you thought it was safe to log into Slashdot...

    RFC EVIL BIT! RFC EVIL BIT! RFC EVIL BIT!

    I sense a new meme in the works, yes.

  81. lighten up by syrinx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I found this highly amusing. Lighten up everybody, you can return to your regularly scheduled "Linux crypto hackers open-sourced the BSD Microsoft monopoly!" posts tomorrow.

    (quote courtesy PA, of course.)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:lighten up by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that's a keeper. Along with the "I stab at thee, M$" one.

    2. Re:lighten up by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. Somebody mod that up, that is hilarious.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:lighten up by ctar · · Score: 1

      The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.

      Thats Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy, no?

    4. Re:lighten up by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Thats Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy, no?

      Yep. :)

      I also like the one about "I always carry two sacks of something around, so when someone says 'Hey, can you give me a hand?' I can say 'Sorry, got these sacks.'"

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  82. A NEW WORLD RECORD !! by borgdows · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Five dupes in a row!!

  83. Hey, Kahtleen, read this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, Kathleen, do something!

    Anything!

    Get this guy outtahere! He's going for 64- evil bits!

    Help us!

    Signed,

    AC.

  84. f u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u r ghey pls fix thx

  85. April Fools Day: by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

    I think this is the one post where we should moderate up all the flamebait and trolling.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  86. Rolf by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    Best april fools joke today. It's good to see the Slashdot editors laughing a bit at themselves.

    --
    I do security
  87. I Surrender - No more RFC3514 Bombing... by wa2flq · · Score: 1

    Please stop your carpet bombing on RFC3514. We can take it any more.

    Our poor Turtle Shells are about to break. The gas masks don't work and the penicillin is all used up.

    Shields are down and we are out of Jolt.

    Please for the love of //insert your deity here// stop the pain.....

  88. Re:DLSoC: But David Letterman isn't funny... by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

    Just repeat the same joke over and over, until its funny.

    This is what's wrong with April fools. Practical jokes are good, Onion-esque articles are great, but this isn't "national one-liner day" this is "national good-natured prank day."

    I find it hard to believe that every time CmdrTaco reports this, he gets this maniacal grin and begins laughing like a mad scientist who just discovered white lab coats. I guess it could happen, but I didn't think the original joke was that funny in the first place. If that's the case, he must tell himself the same knock-knock joke every day, and laugh like he heard it for the first time.

    "Post and repost were in an HTTP header. Post fell out. Who was left?"
    "Repost..."
    "Post and repost were in an HTTP header. Post fell out. Who was left?" ...

    I'm glad I'm not a subscriber.

  89. I find it funny by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    I find it funny... Bang up job, Mitch. I laughed several times today.

  90. Stale repeat by ukoda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The repeats may be annoying but for some of us 1st April was yesterday making it 'off topic' as well. How about some of that 'News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.' ?

  91. Re:Dupe Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dupe Dupe Jew

  92. evil bit by Pompatus · · Score: 1

    Is this some sort of palladium for linux? Does the Foreman iGrill set an evil bit? Which toe is the evil bit for the Carrier pigeon protocol? Is an evil bit a tab or a space in whitespace?

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
  93. UNSATISFIED WIFE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you remember the wedding proposal of Taco? Well, it was a April fools day joke.

    I'M GONNA TEACH YOU HOW TO TREAT A LADY SON!!!

  94. Run out of war news? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Life imitating art or something like that.

  95. RFC to add Evil Bit to TCP/IP... at eleven

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  96. CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ORIGINAL April Fool

  97. Humor in Uniform by Eldie · · Score: 1

    When I want a really good laugh I open Reader's Digest to "Humor in Uniform" and chuckle until I pee myself. But boy, all this /. kookiness is definitely giving them a run for their money.

  98. Evil Bit^5 by rlp · · Score: 1

    To quote Yogi Bera "It's deja vu all over again!"

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  99. Hear hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear hear....or at least block Taco's sh!t.

  100. As long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as there will be a moron bit added to the packets from these stupid redundant unfunny `jokes`.

  101. Give Malda a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is just trying to show you 1% of how many versions of same story he gets every day....

  102. karma bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Notes : edited to pass lameness filter]
    Network Working Group S. Bellovin
    Request for Comments: 3514 AT&T Labs Research
    Category: Informational 1 April 2003

    The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header

    Status of this Memo

    This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

    Copyright Notice

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

    Abstract

    Firewalls, packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. We define a security flag in the IPv4 header as a means of distinguishing the two cases.

    1. Introduction

    Firewalls [CBR03], packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this problem, we define a security flag, known as the "evil" bit, in the IPv4 [RFC791] header. Benign packets have this bit set to 0; those that are used for an attack will have the bit set to 1.

    1.1. Terminology

    The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

    2. Syntax

    The high-order bit of the IP fragment offset field is the only unused bit in the IP header. Accordingly, the selection of the bit position is not left to IANA.

    The bit field is laid out as follows:

    0
    +-+
    |E|
    +-+

    Currently-assigned values are defined as follows:

    0x0 If the bit is set to 0, the packet has no evil intent. Hosts,
    network elements, etc., SHOULD assume that the packet is
    harmless, and SHOULD NOT take any defensive measures. (We note
    that this part of the spec is already implemented by many common
    desktop operating systems.)

    0x1 If the bit is set to 1, the packet has evil intent. Secure
    systems SHOULD try to defend themselves against such packets.
    Insecure systems MAY chose to crash, be penetrated, etc.

    3. Setting the Evil Bit

    There are a number of ways in which the evil bit may be set. Attack applications may use a suitable API to request that it be set. Systems that do not have other mechanisms MUST provide such an API; attack programs MUST use it.

    Multi-level insecure operating systems may have special levels for attack programs; the evil bit MUST be set by default on packets emanating from programs running at such levels. However, the system MAY provide an API to allow it to be cleared for non-malicious activity by users who normally engage in attack behavior.

    Fragments that by themselves are dangerous MUST have the evil bit set. If a packet with the evil bit set is fragmented by an intermediate router and the fragments themselves are not dangerous, the evil bit MUST be cleared in the fragments, and MUST be turned back on in the reassembled packet.

    Intermediate systems are sometimes used to launder attack connections. Packets to such systems that are intended to be relayed to a target SHOULD have the evil bit set.

    Some applications hand-craft their own packets. If these packets are part of an attack, the application MUST set the evil bit by itself.

    In networks protected by firewalls, it is axiomatic that all attackers are on the outside of the firewall. Therefore, hosts inside the firewall MUST NOT set the evil bit on any packets.

    Because NAT [RFC3022] boxes modify packets, they SHOULD set the evil bit on such packets. "Transparent" http and email proxies SHOULD set the ev

  103. Taco won't stop until... by Zildy · · Score: 1

    ...it becomes an EVIL BYTE.

    --
    Karma: Excer..ex...excellahhh...realll good (mostly affected by drinking not done in moderation)
  104. Re:Dupe Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dupe Dupe Dupe Jew

  105. cut it out, dammit by intermodal · · Score: 1

    men have been lynched for less, taco

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  106. Call the authorities! by yellowstone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot is experiencing a Denial-of-content attack!

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    1. Re:Call the authorities! by taustin · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is experiencing a Denial-of-content attack!

      Slashdot is a denial of service attack.

    2. Re:Call the authorities! by 0xA · · Score: 1

      I knew it would happen. Just as soon as the subscriptions came in this place turned into Salon.

  107. Here's your chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every submitted stories on /. only to find that they never made it to the front page ?

    Here's your chance... Post a story related to RFC 3514 before midnight today and it's guaranteed to be on the front page of /.!!

  108. New Subscription Model by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are some days I would pay to not be able to read slashdot at all! Subscribers could pay to have the "evil" bit set so their traffic is filtered out and all requests to slashdot.org result in a 404....

  109. Whooshhh by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    I believe that's the sound of the joke flying over your head.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  110. On geek site Slashdot by bheerssen · · Score: 1

    Posters Troll You!

    --
    (Score: -1, Stupid)
  111. Bit 0! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Each of the 5 bits that have been added is slightly different, due to differing views on good and evil.

    bit 1 - definately evil (contains pictures of dead babies being eaten by a man covered in feces)
    bit 2 - mostly evil (internal microsoft memo)
    bit 3 - pretty evil (download of a vi clone)
    bit 4 - kinda evil (how to enlarge your penis)
    bit 5 - just mischevious (b00bies)

    This allows administrators a fine grained ability to block packets.

    Actually, you left off bit 0 - Most Evil - (think Axis of Evil) Packet carries dreaded Worm of Mass Distruction, DoS stuff, warm wishes from France or 15 cent off coupon on next trip to Paris during transportation strike.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Bit 0! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps bit 0 should be set on packets emanating from the homeland of the world's currently most aggressive and militaristic empire - i.e. the Land of the No Longer Free, and the Home of the Brave Enough Against Enemies So Much Smaller And More Backward That We Are Sure We Can Bomb Them Into The Stone Age. The nation whose trigger-happy teenage army fires on defenseless women and children, and issues no apology. And which same bunch of trigger-happy maniacs has, as usual, managed to kill more of its allies' soldiers in so-called "Friendly fire" incidents than have actually been lost to enemy fire.

      Manwhile you complain in your amusing way, incredibly, about France being evil - apparently only because they don't share your lust for military conquest.

      The world has gone completely mad. And this anonymous coward doesn't think things are likely to improve while so-called educated people are still trying to pretend that they understand the glib reasoning for this insane war that they've been force-fed by the Whitehouse and their pals in the media.

      Sorry for the rant in this inane and pointless thread, but...wake up and smell the burning flesh, huh?

    2. Re:Bit 0! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and, of course, if all 5 bits are lit, we get the greatest evil of all

    3. Re:Bit 0! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      [blah blah blah blah blah]

      Sorry for the rant in this inane and pointless thread, but...wake up and smell the burning flesh, huh?

      It's April Fools Day, here in the USA, a tradition of humor (as you may note, terribly needed at this current time) in pulling small pranks (your shoe is untied, spider on your shoulder, etc.) The real fools are either in Washington D.C. or elected this batch of extremists (good/evil, with us or against us, willing to kill women and children vs. willing to kill women and children)

      Whatever, eh? The dig at the french is in humor, which apparently eluded you. I love the french and respect them (and the germans, too) for standing up to the bunch of coldwarriors who called them names and launched the war. Don't pity us yet, you'll have years to do that, as the people whose blood is boiling over this plot their revenge against us. It's all so stupid. Perhaps April Fools Day is more appropriat than ever.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Bit 0! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg your pardon sir. That guerilla rant attack wasn't actually aimed at you, just at any warlovers or agnostics who happened to wander down this way.

      Your post was kind of in my way so I just boosted myself up over your shoulders to make myself heard. Hope you don't mind.

      We've all got to try to spread the message wherever we can, it's difficult when you're being drowned out by millions of noisy imbeciles.

  112. April 1st is ... by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    April 1st is Groundhog Day.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  113. I think he did it... by bluesky74656 · · Score: 1

    ...just so he could pull the "A Related Slashdot Story" gag. Hey, it's April 1st, give him credit for the attempt, and be glad he isn't trying for 3514 posts for RFC 3514 :)

    --
    This page was generated by a Flock of Attack Kittens for you.
  114. Obviously the joke's on us... by tweakt · · Score: 1

    Taco is doing this on purpose folks. After the 4th one I got the the message.
    I don't get the point since it's not really funny at all, except maybe to him.

    *sigh*

  115. Deja Vu by The+Diver · · Score: 1

    I must have what that guy has in Memento.

  116. Eventually... by lost+sheep · · Score: 2, Funny

    there'll be a murder and this madness will stop.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lost Sheep to Shepard, you got your ears on?
  117. Fascinating. by nurightshu · · Score: 1

    You know, all I can think of is the Simpsons episode that parodies Cape Fear. Sideshow Bob steps on nine rakes in a row -- it starts out with you chuckling, the second or third time it's overkill, but by seven and eight you're pissing your pants because it's the FUNNIEST. THING. EVAR.

    Whaddaya say, Malda? Think you can get this on the front page four more times?

    --
    They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
  118. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft have released a beowulf distro.
    Linus has joined redhat.
    Slackware is closing down.
    Linux now runs on single entangled electrons at MIT
    etc etc etc

  119. Taco by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  120. A Patch for BSD for the RFC3514 Enhancement. by wizkid_org · · Score: 1

    Well to all of your amazement, they have already patched BSD to support this new FEATURE. You may view the patch here: ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/rfc3514-s table.patch

    --
    Pi is a whole number, and its just a conspiracy to make us believe it is a irrtaional number!
  121. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a beowulf cluster of CmdrTaco...err wait, we seem to have one already...

  122. I Double Dare U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go on Taco.. Post it again.. Lets see if you an piss off the entire Slashdot Community.. After all, its still April Fools right.!!!!

  123. BOOOOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure glad I don't spend any money on slashdot. I mean, I know Taco thinks it's a "joke," but really. This blows.

  124. New Poll Options!!! by xchino · · Score: 3, Funny

    We need a new slashdot poll on what your favorite post this year has been, the options could go something like this.

    1. IPv4 "Evil" bit feild.
    2. RFC 3514 to tighten network security
    3. New security measures adpted to TCP/IP
    4. Remote Exploit found in Microsoft's implementation of RFC 3514
    5. CowboyNeal sets each packets evil bit by hand.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  125. haha funny by Atilla · · Score: 1

    don't worry folks, he will stop tomorrow... it's april 1st.

    cmdrtaco: funny, but not "haha" funny. more like "sad" funny.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  126. OT but related... Online "Jokes" truning out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just noticed on google news that a hoax about sars has caused some panic in hong kong.

    I know that you shouldn't every thing you read online, and that any news between March 30 and April 3 should be met with suspicion, but not every one seems to know this. It is really unfortunate that a lot of people believe everything they read online.

    Along with this and some of the jokes some sites are running I wonder we will begin to see some legal actions taken against this kinds of stuff. Gamespot's joke about EA exploiting this Gulf War might cause the company a negative back lash from those who don't get the joke.

  127. Alternate use for the bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a bit to indicate "This has been done to death, already!"

  128. This fucking annoying... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    This is dumb and it's not even that funny...

  129. To Hell with the 'evil bit'! by pcmills · · Score: 1

    What about the 'slashdot bit' in the header. It would make it easy for sites to filter out links from the slashdot front page.

    --
    Ask Slashdot - google for stupid people.
  130. Not me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A week from now, when it's still happening, then you'll be tired!

  131. fnord by Mr+Z · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow... this massive reposting was actually predicted earlier in an unrelated story!

    Spooky, I tell you. ;-)

    1. Re:fnord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since CmdrTaco posted this dupe the last 4 times, one is left to wonder if he'd planned this all along or read that post and felt inspired. Or maybe he's just lame.

  132. Can anyone confirm this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard there was a bit added to every IP packet that tells if you're being naughty or you're being nice.

    Will this stop pr0n from reaching my computer? How about if I just go to sites where the women are older than me?

  133. Explanation of the humor by dacarr · · Score: 1
    OK, since there are so many id10ts who don't understand the subtle humor here, I'm going to destroy the village to save it.

    The reason this is funny is because Taco is known for duplicating posts on stories.

    If you still can't grasp it, you will never understand.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Explanation of the humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we understand. We grasp it. It's just not funny.

      Cock.

  134. Is this really a joke? by maddskillz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people would assume that the multiple posting of this story is an April Fool's joke, but given the quaility of the editing here lately, I have my doubts

  135. Hmm by darkblade1782 · · Score: 0

    Only another five more to go before it's a typical /. story!

  136. OH NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that it has been made public, Slashdot has been DOSed by the evil bit!

    Figures a hacker has known about it and has been exploiting it to post dups for quite some time. I guess some script kiddies just found out about it today and download a kit.

    Just you wait, the next thing we will be seeing is dupes about goatse, OS/author/etc is dead, a lot of "First Posted Story!!111," and for those of use who us IE all the stories will appear as a really long line.

  137. You don't say? by azav · · Score: 1

    Really now, I wish someone had informed me about this earlier.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  138. It's about Time! by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    It's about time that Slashdot editors finally got off their asses and reported in this - all the other geek boards that I read did so days ago!

    My question is: Will enough of these new packet headers coming in affect my Beowolf cluster?

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
  139. Bit functionality by azav · · Score: 1

    Will this bit identify packets if they are from an Axis of Evil or meerly if they contain evil of some known from?

    What if a bible thumping libertarian sends the packet?

    Oh dear.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  140. hey, did you hear the one about the new bit? by verch · · Score: 1

    In the words of the great George Forman on Saturday Night Live..

    RAAARRRRGHGHHH!!! AUDIENCE GET IT!!!!

  141. Re:Dupe Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hebe Kike Dupe Jew.

  142. Hey, I thought it was April Fools' Day by thelenm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought today was April Fools Day! But I'm so disappointed, because I haven't noticed anything different about the site today, hmph.

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  143. Funny! by itallushrt · · Score: 1

    The first 2 or 3 times this was posted it was lame, but now that there seem to be plans to stretch this puppy out for over 24 hours I think its great. Especially to all those Anonymous Cowards who keep flaming CmdTaco for it.

  144. It will not work... by MrIcee · · Score: 1
    ... I'm sorry but the "evil bit" simply will not work.

    Consider, for example, a program like SATAN. Now... if SATAN is used by a hax0r to examine a system the EVIL BIT should be set to '1'. But if a SYSADMIN uses SATAN to check his system to ensure that his system is safe the EVIL BIT has to be a '0'.

    This means that PSYCHIC ENERGY must be involved in order for SATAN to determine the USERS INTENT and thus set the EVIL BIT properly. But never fear... I've written a scrubber named "RAPTURE" whos job it is to check for packets from SATAN with the EVIL BIT SET and CLENSE the bit by sending it to heaven where it will be happy with 77 virgin '0's.

    1. Re:It will not work... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about? SATAN must ALWAYS set the evil bit. If you are a sysadmin you should be using SAINT which sets the bit to 0. Duh.

  145. Taco's Revenge... by Chymaera · · Score: 1

    And don't miss Taco's Revenge II, III, and IV...oh, wait, we just read those. :-) But seriously, this isn't meant to be a serious news site...Taco knows he double posts a lot, and while he tries (meagerly) to avoid it, it's not a high priority of his and it doesn't mean more than a second or so lost out of your day. I thought this...erm, quintuple post was hilarious--it's nice to see that Taco realizes how much some people hate him for double posting now and then, and that he does not, in fact, consider this a 'serious' news site in spite of himself. Slashdot's not CNN.com, and that's a good thing. I like the dupes--I wouldn't have it any other way. :-)

  146. Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you taco.

  147. and again and again by EpsCylonB · · Score: 4, Funny

    we are at war with oceania, we have always been at war with oceania.

  148. Hmm by xihr · · Score: 1

    April Fool's jokes are usually funniest when they're 1. actually funny and 2. don't make the joketeller look foolish.

  149. lETS dupe Cmdr Taco!! by kittenthief · · Score: 1

    Ok...lets see how much the editors like dupes... I suggest everyone Dupe their mail boxes with the same story... Any suggestions? maybe something on the NEW RFC with the EVIL BIT???

  150. Jeeezus freakin' christ! by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
    Goddamnit man, what's the deal with this stuff gettin' posted over and over. I mean, man, what the fuchk. Friggin fraggin, flaavin, floopin sloothpthhtin, sthhhpptling, slttthhpppptl... oh, goddamnit, look at all this drool over the place. Damnit taco, now look at what you've done to me. Gotta clean up my keyboard before my boss comes and sees me reading your doggam replicated posts all day long, over and over and over and ARgg arrrgg argg arff!

    --
    "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  151. Re:It's a... MmmmMONSTER DUPE dupe... by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think Taco's been playing too much Unreal and was going for the
    Monster Kill with this story...

    If I have to explain this joke to you all, then you must be Quake players.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  152. Re:Taco's loopy by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Somebody needs to reboot Taco, before he melts down in an endless loop.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  153. Ha! by isaacwith2as · · Score: 1

    Fourteenth Post!

    --
    Give a man a fire he'll be warm for a night. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Ha! by neurostar · · Score: 1

      Bah! So I don't know my numbers... *shurgs*

      hehe ;)

  154. Also comming soon - LIPSEC by wildzeke · · Score: 0

    I have heard rumors of a new security protocol, Lightwieght IP SECurity, or LIPSEC. LIPSEC believes in the KISS philosophy, Keep It Simple Stupid. If users need encapsulation to protect the IP headers, then they can envoke LIPSTICK, Lightwieght IP STICK over protocol.

  155. Cmdr Naruto's graduation by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Whoa! It seems Slashdot articles have become sentient and even developed some Ninjutsu duplication skillz!

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  156. Enough with the fake news, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so we can expect nothing from Slashdot on April 1. One is funny. Two is too. Anything beyond that is annoying.

    REAL NEWS PLEASE - THANKS!

  157. Is Commander Taco hitting the crack pipe ? by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    Whats up with these multiple dup stores?

    Oh wait *I* get it - its a DEEP April 1 joke! Good one!

    I think....

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  158. And one bit to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    designate that the byte is a male or a female.
    The byte stream will be designated male or female depending upon which bytes are in majority.

    Some countries will not allow male bytes to flow with female bytes. Some people will want male bytes with male bytes only and others with females only.

    And on and on and on...

  159. In related news... by Fabio+Dias · · Score: 1

    Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda arrested for terrorism
    from the free-cmdrtaco dept.

    Police officers arrested today Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, chief editor of slashdot.org, under five charges of terrorism. When asked for information, officials replied that "gross editorial incompetence is obviously a thing only a terorist would do. If you're not a terrorist, why would you need to post the same story five times in a row? And why are you asking this? If you don't know you must be one of them. Guards! Arrest him!"

    Slashdot.org's chief editor charged for terrorism
    from the if-you're-not-with-us-you're-against-us dept.

    ...

  160. Does George Bush know about these packets? by Portent · · Score: 1

    Someone should alert him that there are new members of the axis of evil spreading evil packets to the unsuspecting public.

    Is this the weapon of mass destruction of the future?

  161. Happy Groundhog Day! by Kakurenbo+Shogun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha, ha! It's Groundhog Day again! You have to read this same story over and over for the next six weeks!

    --
    Convert RSS to HTML - integrate webfeeds into your website
    1. Re:Happy Groundhog Day! by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard that they did calculations and figured that Groundhog Day would have taken place in over 10000 days - that's 30 years of Groundhog Day. ...makes the movie a lot darker when you think of it that way...

  162. Spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you are saying there is some kind of connection between Ben and Glory?

  163. 3514 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does 3514 mean? It's in all the post, so it has to be part of the joke.

  164. Evil byte by CjKing2k · · Score: 1

    one bit isn't good enough
    here is my proposal:

    +1 cracker bit (use when attempting buffer overflow, backdoor, exploit, etc.)
    +2 terrorist bit (need I say what countries to put here?)
    +4 deceptive business bit (apply to 192.189.271.221 and others
    +8 p0rn bit (apply to 90% of gnutella searches)
    +16 spam bit (apply to SMTP transfers from domains including, but not limited to, yahoo.com, hotmail.com, and aol.com.. might as well use it if you're reading mail from any of these too)
    +32 annoying bit (IRC scripts should use this)
    +64 utterly-insecure bit (IIS, IE, Outlook, and practically all other Microsoft programs should apply this bit)
    +128 Pinky and the Brain bit (network traffic used to try to take over the world; apply to sites including, but not limited to, 207.46.249.27, 65.244.101.222, Bill Gates' personal T1)

  165. Support added to FreeBSD by kkenn · · Score: 1

    Support for RFC 3514 was committed to FreeBSD already.

  166. Oh, come now... by bazmonkey · · Score: 1

    I know we're supposed to be geeks and all, but I highly doubt a site will be slashdotted because thousands of pre-pubescent single boys flocked to go read an RFC specification.

  167. Recursive Slashdotting... by bazmonkey · · Score: 1

    Now, if only the old posts were all updated, linking to the other 4, sincerely promising that each one is taking you to another CRITICAL PIECE of the IPv4 header saga...

  168. Did you know that short-term memory jokes ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... get better with time?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  169. did danyone realize what day it is? by Prion86 · · Score: 1

    last time i looked it was 4/1/03. better known as APRIL FOOL'S DAY. call me crazy, but i think taco is posting this so many times because of all the complaints about the dupes in the last year. i think its kinda funny myself. and a side note for those of you complaining about missing out on the real news...dont any of you slashdotters ever read other news filters?. metafilter, fark, memepool and the reg (to name a few) usually scoop slashdot anyway. ive also noticed that many slashdotters get their news from more than one place. oh...and at the end of the day you will be back to slashdot tomorow anyway....so chill out folks.

    --
    "Alot of people don't know what they are doing...and most are pretty good at it." -George Carlin
  170. Geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only geeks would find humor in stuff like this..

  171. Enough posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys post this story enough? I've seen it posted atleast four times...

  172. what king of stupid name is cmdrtaco anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like a General in the mexican army.

    or that damn taco that craps ice cream from south park.

    I guess he can call himself Cmdrcocksucker with all the fuckin' money he's got. he's shitting ice cream all the way to the bank with andover net green. ( I betcha' andover is regretting the purchase now....)

  173. And in related news... by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    Terrorists around the world have agreed to begin wearing their "Hug me! I'm a terrorist" badges.

  174. WORST JOKE EVER by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

    -nt-

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  175. Re:Breaking News!: RFC 3514 and Repeat Were In A B by Klync · · Score: 1

    RFC 3514.

    --

    ----
    Not to be confused with Col.
  176. Taco Takes the Fifth Amendment by oPless · · Score: 1

    Network Working Group S. Bellovin
    Request for Comments: 3514 AT&T Labs Research
    Category: Informational 1 April 2003
    The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header

    Status of this Memo

    This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

    Copyright Notice

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

    Abstract

    Firewalls, packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. We define a security flag in the IPv4 header as a means of distinguishing the two cases.

    1. Introduction

    Firewalls CBR03 , packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this problem, we define a security flag, known as the "evil" bit, in the IPv4 RFC791 header. Benign packets have this bit set to 0; those that are used for an attack will have the bit set to 1.

    1.1. Terminology

    The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 .

    2. Syntax

    The high-order bit of the IP fragment offset field is the only unused bit in the IP header. Accordingly, the selection of the bit position is not left to IANA.

    The bit field is laid out as follows:

    0
    +-+
    |E|
    +-+

    Currently-assigned values are defined as follows:

    0x0 If the bit is set to 0, the packet has no evil intent. Hosts, network elements, etc., SHOULD assume that the packet is harmless, and SHOULD NOT take any defensive measures. (We note
    that this part of the spec is already implemented by many common desktop operating systems.)

    0x1 If the bit is set to 1, the packet has evil intent. Secure systems SHOULD try to defend themselves against such packets. Insecure systems MAY chose to crash, be penetrated, etc.

    3. Setting the Evil Bit

    There are a number of ways in which the evil bit may be set. Attack applications may use a suitable API to request that it be set. Systems that do not have other mechanisms MUST provide such an API; attack programs MUST use it.

    Multi-level insecure operating systems may have special levels for attack programs; the evil bit MUST be set by default on packets emanating from programs running at such levels. However, the system MAY provide an API to allow it to be cleared for non-malicious activity by users who normally engage in attack behavior.

    Fragments that by themselves are dangerous MUST have the evil bit set. If a packet with the evil bit set is fragmented by an intermediate router and the fragments themselves are not dangerous, the evil bit MUST be cleared in the fragments, and MUST be turned back on in the reassembled packet.

    Intermediate systems are sometimes used to launder attack connections. Packets to such systems that are intended to be relayed to a target SHOULD have the evil bit set.

    Some applications hand-craft their own packets. If these packets are part of an attack, the application MUST set the evil bit by itself.

    In networks protected by firewalls, it is axiomatic that all attackers are on the outside of the firewall. Therefore, hosts inside the firewall MUST NOT set the evil bit on any packets.

    Because NAT RFC3022 boxes modify packets, they SHOULD set the evil bit on such packets. "Transparent" http and email proxies SHOULD set the evil bit on their reply packets to the innocent client host.

    Some hosts scan other hosts in a fashion that can alert intrusion detection systems. If the scanning is part of a benign research project, the evil bit MUST NOT be set

  177. Suggestions by dmarx · · Score: 1

    1. Post only one or two April Fool's jokes. They get old.
    2. Do not post the same joke more than once.
    3. If you must post more than one or two jokes, post them under "It's Funny. Laugh."

    --
    "Do I dare disturb the universe?"