Slashdot Mirror


Matrix Gets Egyptian Ban For Explicit Religion

pajor writes "BBC News is reporting that that The Matrix Reloaded has been banned in Egypt. The country's censorship board cited violence which might 'harm social peace', but also said the 'religious themes' of the film's storyline, about the search for the creator and control of the human race, may cause 'crises'. A statement said: 'Despite the high technology and fabulous effects of the movie, it explicitly handles the issue of existence and creation, which are related to the three divine religions, which we all respect and believe in.'"

187 of 1,362 comments (clear)

  1. Perhaps the censor can explain... by Goonie · · Score: 5, Funny

    the scene with the Architect, then. Obviously he understands well enough to ban the thing... :)

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not that tough on its face value. Some spoilers here, but if you haven't seed/downloaded the movie by now, you aren't going to. If you are planning to wait for dvd, don't read this.

      The architect says that this is the 6th incarnation of the one [confirming evidence, The guy who likes to curse in french and makes really good desserts said he "survived his predicessors"].

      The reason that the one exists is because of a 'flaw' in a basic equation of the matrix. Earlier attempts at Matrices (how do you plurialize a proper name with a previously existing plural form of a general noun?) failed because the brains would reject the programming. A solution was found that gave the people a 'choice' to accept the program or not, at a subconcious level. Those that rejected it ended up in Zion.

      The remainder in that unbalanced equation leads to the creation of the One. Because it is a forseen eventuality, the machines believe that they can control it. Part of this control manefests itself by giving the One a strong connection to humanity. In Neo's case, it was more specific - to one person, Trinity. Because of Neo's strong connection to her, he wasn't going to say 'fuck you' to the Architect and blow the whole place up. Blowing the whole place up would lead to the death of everyone in the matrix, and coupled with the destruction of Zion would lead to the extinction of the human race.

      Now, the architect says that the One is supposed to then distribute the code he carries back into the prime program. I suppose to 'rebalance' the equation, but we didn't get there yet. I assume that there will be another form of control that would make Neo 'want' to do it.. in order to get something else done. Probably after the destruction of Zion, he will have to pick the people to repopulate Zion, otherwise the unbalancedness will destroy the matrix.

      And that's about it to explain the architect scene. Again, he lays it out fairly plain. Now to mess with your heads a little :)

      Remember afterwards when they were back in the ship and he was talking to Morpheus about what happened, and why the war wasn't over. Neo said the following: "It doesn't matter. I believed him." To me, that line just sounded slightly out of character. And it probably was supposed to.

      Think back to when Neo was talking to the Oracle. When he asked how he could believe her, she replied: "You can't. You have to make up your own damn mind." I think that a good portion of movie 3 is going to revolve around that.

      --
      Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    2. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by sp1nl0ck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The second film is Neo's quest for a purpose. On the basis of the Q&A between Neo and The Architect, Neo's purpose seems to be that he is the reboot switch for the Matrix.

      He destroys the Source and the Sentinels waste Zion, with the exception of the 23 people he chooses to perpetuate the species. And the whole thing starts over.

      Presumably Revolutions will show Neo to be the worm that turned, so to speak...

      --
      War is God's way of teaching Americans geography
    3. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Part of this control manefests itself by giving the One a strong connection to humanity. In Neo's case, it was more specific - to one person, Trinity. Because of Neo's strong connection to her, he wasn't going to say 'fuck you' to the Architect and blow the whole place up.

      The impression I got was that this was the first time that the One had been in love, hence the reason why he didnt take either of the choices presented to him, and he made his own path.....

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    4. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by Webere · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps a transcript will help:

      [I transcribed this personally, there were a few places where the audio was garbled, and I couldn't make out what was being said, those are marked with "[unclear]", and a guess at what it sounded like.]

      Architect: "Hello Neo."

      Neo: "Who are you?"

      Architect: "I am the Architect. I created the Matrix. I have been waiting for you. You have many questions and though the process has altered your [unclear] irrevocably human, ergo some of my answers you will understand and some of them you will not. Concurrently, while your first question [unclear] the most pertinent, you may or may not realize it is also the most irrelavent."

      Neo: "Why am I here?"

      Architect: "Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the matrix. You are the eventuality of an anomaly which, despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. While it remains a burden assiduously avoided, it is not unexpected and thus not beyond a measure of control, which has led [unclear] here."

      Neo: "You haven't answered my question."

      Architect: "Quite right. Interesting. That was quicker than the others."

      [Neos in the video screen begin asking "others?", "how many others?", "what others?", etc]

      Architect: "The matrix is older than you know. I prefer counting from the emergence of [unclear] anomaly to the emergence of the next in which case this is the sixth version."

      [Video screen Neos: "You're lying.", giving the camera the finger, laughing, "There are only two possible explainations: either no one told me..."]

      Neo: "... or no one knows."

      Architect: "Precisely. As you are undoubtedly gathering, the anomaly is systemic, creating fluctuations in even the [unclear, simplistic?] equations."

      [Video screen Neos: "You can't control me!", "I'm going to smash you to bits", more giving the camera the finger, etc.]

      Neo: "Choice. The problem is [unclear, choice?]"

      [cuts to Trinity fighting. yawn.]

      Architect: "The first matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect it was a work of art. Flawless. Sublime. A triumpth equalled only by its monumental failure. The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. [unclear] based on your history, to more accurately reflect the varying [unclear] of your nature. However I was again frustrated by failure. I have since come to understand that the answer eluded me becuase it required a lesser mind, or perhaps a mind less bound by the parameters of perfection. Thus the answer was stumbled upon by another, an intuitive program initially created to investigate certain aspects of the human [unclear]. If I am the father of the matrix, she would undoubtedly be its mother."

      Neo: "The Oracle."

      Architect: "Please. As I was saying she stumbled upon a solution whereby nearly 99 percent of all test subjects accepted the program as long as they were given a choice, even if they were only aware of the choice at a [mere/near] unconscious level. While [unclear] it was obviously fundamentally flawed, thus creating the otherwise contradictory systemic anomaly, that if left unchecked might threaten the system itself. Ergo, those that [unclear] program, while a minority, if unchecked would constitute an escalading probabiltiy of disaster."

      Neo: "This is about Zion."

      Architect: "[unclear] are here because Zion is about to be destroyed, its every living inhabitant [unclear, terminated?] entire existance eradicated."

      Neo: "Bullshit."

      [Video screen Neos: "Bullshit"]

      Architect: "Denial is the most predictable of all human responses. But rest assured, this will be the sixth time we have destroyed it, and we have become exceedingly efficient [unclear, 'at it'?]."

      [cuts back to more of Trinity fighting. Nobody cares.]

      Architect: "The function of The One is

    5. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mode=pedant

      how do you plurialize a proper name with a previously existing plural form of a general noun?

      Proper names take a regular plural. Thus when talking of mathematics, it is one matrix, many matrices. When talking of movie-reality-constructs, one Matrix, many Matrixes. That's the English language for you.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    6. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by _bug_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The remainder in that unbalanced equation leads to the creation of the One.

      There's a problem with the matrix. Not everyone is accepting their programming. If left in the matrix, these few will grow and eventually the matrix will crash.

      The machines use Zion to weed out those who don't accept the programming. Zion, in effect, is keeping the matrix from crashing.

      It is the job of the one to simply experience humanity from the side of those who live in Zion. He then takes this experience back into the source and it is combined with the existing code of the matrix in an attempt to make the matrix more suited to humanity. The idea is that eventually you're going to refine the code enough that anyone and everyone accepts the matrix and Zion is no longer needed.

      This is a lot like genetic programming.

      Part of this control manefests itself by giving the One a strong connection to humanity. In Neo's case, it was more specific - to one person, Trinity.

      This is not neccessarily intended. If you listen to the Architect's speech the love for humanity is like error handling code in a program. If the One shows up at the source and doesn't care about humanity then it's probable he won't want to save humanity or Zion and will just head back into the matrix. That would lead to all of humanity to become extinct and life for the machines becomes bad.

      Neo's programming to love humanity manifests himself in the love of a single person. Trinity. This is different from previous ones who loved humanity in general. This difference in love is important because that allows Neo to make the choice to go back into the Matrix rather than into the source. Neo has basically doomed humanity but his love for Trinity perhaps does not let him realize that. Thus the whole bit at the end where the architect is mentioning that Neo's judgement is being blurred.

      Because of Neo's strong connection to her, he wasn't going to say 'fuck you' to the Architect and blow the whole place up. Blowing the whole place up would lead to the death of everyone in the matrix, and coupled with the destruction of Zion would lead to the extinction of the human race.

      Wrong. That's exactly what happens. Neo chooses door #2 and goes back into the matrix. That will lead to the end of the matrix as once Zion is destroyed by the machines, there will be a pile-up of those who don't accept the matrix living in the matrix. This will eventually lead to the matrix crashing. Thus, humanity dies.

      Neo had two choices before him. He took one of the two. The one he took was to return to the matrix.

      I assume that there will be another form of control that would make Neo 'want' to do it.

      Neo's love for humanity, that which is built-into all Ones, is what is suppose to make him do it. That's the control. But Trinity ufcks the whole situation up and allows Neo to ignore that built-in control.

    7. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by broberds · · Score: 2, Funny

      That wasn't really an Architect. It was George Costanza pretending to be an Architect.

      --
      -- To Err is human, to Ignignokt divine.
    8. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by jtdubs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why the two blond-haired see-through dudes said:

      "We are getting tired of this."
      "Yes, we are."

      Or something like that.

      And that's why former-Agent Smith wants to "return the favor" to Neo and is tracking him down. It's because of some kind of revenge/vengeance that isn't born out of emotion?

      It's so obvious from watching the program's interact that they have emotions. Crazy french dude cheated on his wife, so his wife got pissed, went behind his back, killed one of his favorite programs and gave the good guys the key maker, all of which infuriated french dude. Those don't sound quite like the actions of emotionless beings to me.

      Justin Dubs

    9. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree with this insanely popular theory, because it is insanely popular, and thus, too easy. I have a feeling that the Brothers gave this bit of information away as a red herring. I never considered this and just thought that he had some control over the machines now. Instead of being some sort of other world, he could had just had some amount of command control within the machines, with the ability to say "Hey, go blow up now".

      Perhaps the machines have been trying to develop telepathy among the humans. After all, the Oracle was created to "explore certain aspects of the human psyche".

    10. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by EuropeanSwallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is the way I see it:

      (The mandatory ***** SPOILER ALERT! *****)

      - The first Matrix was created perfect, but the human nature would refuse to accept it.

      - Subsequentialy, deliberate flaws were introduced in the Matrix, to make it more "humanly gullable".

      - These flaws side effect was that some humans were able to perceive the fake reality they were living in.

      Now here is the tricky part!

      - Perceiving it, they were fed with the idea that they could escape from it, "awakening". My notion is that Zion and the ones living there are still in the Matrix, in a sort of "garbage collector" that gathers the ones that perceive the flaws. I believe that, at some time, the Architect mentions that the ones "escaping" from the Matrix would evolve exponentialy.

      - Neo's part, instigated by the Oracle, who acts like a Matrix system process that monitors the amount of "anomalies", is to act as an "escape valve", that triggers when the anomalies reach a given critical mass, letting the Matrix know that it's time for a "reboot", eliminating the existing anomalies and starting all over again. This is the weekness of this Matrix model.

      - What is also happening (I believe), is that, despite this "reboot" process, the cleanup is not being total, and Neo is being able to retain knowledge between cycles. This explains the alusion to previous "flawed" Neo's.

      All of this explains one of the points I believe is crucial, the usage of Neo's powers in Zion, towards the end of the flick. I believe he is still in the Matrix!

      Also, I believe that the Matrix cycles will como to a stop, and the Matrix exposed, when Neo finaly becomes aware that the reality he believe is "real" (Zion) is still a lie and that he is still in the Matrix, which seams is starting to happen.

      Hope somebody follows along my line of thought!

    11. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally I think Trinity is an agent and the outside world is another Matrix, but we'll just have to wait and see

      Trinity can't be an agent because agents can't leave the matrix. the password she used (zion0101) suggests she knows more than the others though.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    12. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by DotComVictim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Evidence supporting this theory:

      The Oracle predicts events that happen both inside and outside the Matrix

      Trinity's kiss in the real world restores Neo's life in the Matrix.

      Agent Smith travels into a human outside of the Matrix.

      Neo can control machines outside of the Matrix.

      Your projected "residual body image" is actually what you look like. Consider that Neo when he wakes in Zion/Surface, looks the same as in the Matrix. How can he know what he looks like, if, in fact he has never seen his own body.

      And the most telling of all, which was for me very difficult to accept in the first movie - if you die in the matrix, you die in the real world as well. You don't die if you die in a dream. Nor do you start bleeding internally if you get hit in a simulation.


      It's not that Zion is a higher level simulation or a recursion. Zion/Surface and the Matrix are both the same simulation.

      It is anyone's guess what the purpose of the simulation is. Popular theories are that humans are used for brain power, etc...

      My belief is that the simulation is intended to produce an effect. Many concurrent simulations are running. The architect has been attempting to force Neo to express the choice between logic and emotion in the most clear cut way possible - the two doors. In all other cases, this has been the end of the simulation, as logic has prevailed.

      Why? If Neo was supposed to return to the Source, why offer a second door. No architect would be that silly - this is like playing with matches.

      This could provide him with a test to determine if his program (Neo) has developed the capacity for emotion (and possibly, a test for consciousness). Perhaps he is trying to meld AI with an element of humanity to create a new sentient life form.

      Perhaps emotion is the bug he is trying to eliminate - his AI programs are slowly developing emotional responses, and he uses Neo as a test subject for the penultimate expression of the bug, so he can find a way to eliminate it.

      Perhaps Neo is living in a self-defined delusion. The architect exists to allow him to restart his simulation as he desires, and he is the One - in another sense. The only living being in the simulation. The reboot cycles are refinements of his simulation until it has been adjusted to the point that he desires to return to it.

      Perhaps the Architect is seeking a way to override logic, using emotion as a control. This emotional control, and his study of the mechanisms of it, may be useful to him outside of the simulation, as a form of mind control.

    13. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by coopaq · · Score: 2, Funny
      Has anybody considered that maybe the Architect is lying?

      Yeah. I've already seen that show.
      It's Wizard of Fucking OZ. Maybe our
      ancestors die due to unoriginal material.

      Am I too cynical?

    14. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does the password suggest she knew more?
      because if she's aware that this is the sixth time she's done it, and the passwords started at zion0, zion0101 would be the sixth iteration's password (binarily speaking)

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  2. So? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are they actually saying that someone inducing thought into their culture from the west might cause an uproar?

    *Gasp*

    That questioning the truth is a bad thing?

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    1. Re:So? by mirko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please, don't call "The Truth" whatever is discussed in the Matrix : you've got your perception of the reality whereas Egyptians may have theirs.

      They are living not far from Israel who did take some of their territories during the 1967 war they actually started (the E., not the I.).

      For this reason, we can understand that Joe-6-amphorae (the average Egyptian) doesn't want to see a movie which describes the fear Zion people are living in.

      Cocnerning the many religious aspects of the movie, I'd rather describe these as some uninspired mysticism.

      As I am not trolling (I hate these times when one must explicitely say he's not trolling) I now expect anybody who doesn't agree with these points to discuss these with me, instead of modbombing me to oblivion.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:So? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 5, Funny
      Thats the offset between christian and moslem religions. So You have to wait something like 300 hundred years to get moslem religion to some civilized state

      Shouldn't that be at least 300 years, since you can't put a definite number on it until Christianity becomes civilized?

    3. Re:So? by ndogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have to question something that is the "truth," then perhaps it's not "truth."

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    4. Re:So? by TomV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are they actually saying that someone inducing thought into their culture from the west might cause an uproar

      I suspect they're saying that, in a country with a history of Islamist resistance, multiple assassination attempts on President Mubarak, semi-regular spates of suicide bombings which have killed hundreds of people over the last 20 years, a country which has long been a fertile recruiting ground for the various armed Islamist groups, from Ayman al-Zawahiri down, in a country which has been struggling to maintain a secular state while its leaders are condemned as apostates and traitors, puppets of a purported US agenda to corrupt the beliefs of devout muslims, religion matters.

      It's a fine piece of entertainment, it's a thought-provoking piece of art maybe. But is it worth risking yet another islamist onslaught on the people of Egypt just to get this film shown? Because certainly past performance shows that introducing some thoughts from the west has caused the sort of uproar in which people get killed.

      TomV

    5. Re:So? by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That questioning the truth is a bad thing?"

      Well, there are plenty of people that believe evolution doesn't exist, the earth was/is flat, and god hates Saddam Hussein =)

    6. Re:So? by realnowhereman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think "the truth" referred to by the parent is the encumbant religions in egypt. Nobody would seriously suggest that the Matrix is some sort of basis for new world order. However, I (and I believe the parent) would suggest that questioning "the truth" over the last 1000 years of human society has led to our continued advancement (and in some cases regression) as a species and should not be so lightly brushed aside.

      Your point about Joe-6-amphorae not wanting to see the movie may well be true. It may well be that every egypitian would despise the movie. But we'll never know that will we because a small subset of the population has decreed that they are incapable of viewing it without destroying society. (I notice that the censor hasn't instantly gone on an all out looting spree).

      I think you are concentrating too much on the content of the movie - good/bad/accurate/theistic/philosophic/whatever - none of these is the point. It could be a film about mutant peanuts from the planet foobar, the point is - it is a work of fiction that has been unilaterally edited out of a nation. The level of condecension and disrespect to the population that is needed to do such a thing is staggering.

      Similar things (though not so extreme) are happening in many western societies as well at the momemnt. As an example; the UK government is considering an unhealthy food tax. Leaving aside the economic unfairness (to poorer families) of this, it is an example of the state forcing its view of good and bad on a population; if not removing the choice then certainly limiting it serverely.

      Phew. I think I'll stop now before I bust a vein or something....

      --
      Carpe Daemon
    7. Re:So? by Kosi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      since when has Christianity not been civilized in your life time?

      It was never. Just look at what christian fundamentalists are in the U.S. government and what those brickheads did and do.

    8. Re:So? by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the definitions of civilized is refined and sophisticated. Since the Catholic church only recognized that the earth orbits the sun (instead of vice-versa) within my lifetime, and it is a more sophisticated and refined description of our solar system, that is an example of uncivilized behavior from Christianity within our time (especially considering that people were put to death for claiming the Earth orbited the sun...)

    9. Re:So? by realnowhereman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But is it worth risking yet another islamist onslaught on the people of Egypt just to get this film shown?

      Yes.

      I was told a story by my Mum, who works in a children's nursery. She suggested to the playgroup leader that they get one of those boards with the kids names on and give them gold stars for doing something good. The idea was rejected; the reason being that the playgroup leader once worked as a missionary in Africa, teaching children. They introduced just such a board. When a child was given a gold star, some of the others would pick on them. Their solution was to stop giving out stars. Did this make better children? The result - the children who would have gotten stars no longer did, perhaps leaving them unrewarded and unfulfilled; the children who thought bullying was acceptable were never corrected and were left to continue on in life to who knows what; the teachers are left feeling impotent - there job has become to tip-toe around children, not causing trouble.

      I would argue that not facing up to problems like this very rarely makes them better.

      --
      Carpe Daemon
    10. Re:So? by LeoDV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe it was Ben Franlkin who said (not exact quote) "if you are willing to give up a bit of your liberty for peace of mind, then be ready to give up all your liberty for you will never have peace of mind" I know it sounds like I'm minimizing your very sound argument with some general, stereotyped quote about freedom of speech, but think about it. A choice between a movie and the political stabililty of a middle eastern country sounds pretty easy, but if Egypt say "We banned that movie because if not it might disturb the peace." and we just go "Oh. Well I guess it's okay then." haven't we opened a floodgate that's going to be very hard to close?

    11. Re:So? by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would argue that not facing up to problems like this very rarely makes them better

      Umm this rings a bit hollow given the Matrix Reloaded is a movie created by Hollywood, a set of companies that rarely portray reality and often produced badly twisted and potentially offensive characterisations.

      Lets put it this way, Al Jazerra is pilloried in the US and yet represents the view of the US from the Arab nations. Isn't this abuse of the channel exactly the same as what Egypt is doing here ? Except that what the US aims to do to Al Jazeera is dealing at a much less superficial level than banning a movie.

      Maybe, just maybe, for Egypt this film would be considered offensive and this censoring is indicative of the failure of Hollywood to look outside its borders.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    12. Re:So? by Surak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please, don't call "The Truth" whatever is discussed in the Matrix : you've got your perception of the reality whereas Egyptians may have theirs.

      They are living not far from Israel who did take some of their territories during the 1967 war they actually started (the E., not the I.).

      For this reason, we can understand that Joe-6-amphorae (the average Egyptian) doesn't want to see a movie which describes the fear Zion people are living in.


      You are the only person I see so far that *gets* it -- only you slightly missed it by *that* much ... /me holds thumb and index finger together

      Mostly, the Egyptian censor is probably freaking out of about the word 'Zion'. Islamists call the people of Israel and all countries that support Israel (esp. the U.S.) 'Zionists', referring I'm sure to Mt. Zion...the Egyption censor feels that the term Zion anyway, refers to Israel.

      That's it. That's all that he's freaked out about, most likely.

    13. Re:So? by the+gnat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most brands of Christianity that survive today have learned to cope with modernity in all its varied forms. I do not particularly care for the Christian Right, but they are generally reconciled to a technologically advanced, pluralistic society. Their odd hangups about gay people and school prayer are actually exceptions to this rule. The only groups that explicitly reject modern life are small sects like the Amish and (to a lesser degree) the Jehovah's Witnesses, neither of which can be considered a viable political or social force in any country. (The Amish don't even proslytize - they just keep to themselves, and can't be compared to radical Islamists.)

      The more virulent brands of Islam, however, most certainly do prefer a less sophisticated society. The Taliban seriously did drive Afghanistan further into the Stone Age than the Russians managed to. Banning television, eliminating women's education, blowing up its cultural heritage - it's not cultural chauvinism to call this "uncivilized". Turkey has shown (imperfectly) that it's possible to form a large Western democracy from a Muslim population, but they did this by explicitly rejecting Islamic influences on government.

      This is the key point: no thriving, modern democracy that I can think of has been able to advance as long as its government is tied to religious leaders. The only first-world nation whose identity is bound to a particular sect is Israel, and I'd argue that Israel is a little more complicated (they don't evangelize either, for one). I realize it's fashionable to compare Bush and the Religious Right to the Nazis or the Catholic Inquisition, but the influence of religious leaders on US government is many orders of magnitude less than in, say, Saudi Arabia. Unless you equate abortions with civilization, it's hard to see what your complaint is.

      (A side point: what this means is probably that we will never see another country that joins a thriving, evangelical religion with a modern, pluralistic, technically advanced society. The only way to have both is to completely separate them as in the US (most of the time), which then limits the extent to which religion can influcence the development of the nation and culture. The only sect I can think of that might prove this wrong is the Mormons.)

    14. Re:So? by KjetilK · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Disclaimer: Didn't RFTA, haven't seen any of the movies.

      But I have been to Egypt, and my parents have been there twice. It is a fantastic country, allthough you'll see bottomless poverty like I have seen in no other place. Egyptians, like most arabs, are very friendly and respectful people, very proud of their history and their country, with good reason I might add.

      And indeed, islamist extremism is a serious threat to not only most Egyptians, but the entire region , and possibly the whole earth. But it is a problem because people do not have basic human rights. It is the obvious poverty problem. Unemployed people have too much time on their hands, and they are easy prey for extremists.

      But they do not have the right to free expression, to peacefully protest, the suppression of the people is what is causing the problem.

      In that situation, it is my sincere belief that the problems must be addressed by openness, by allowing people to speak, and by allowing them to participate in society. It is the only way to confront extremism, to insist on more human rights. When exposed to different viewpoints, extremism will be moderated.

      It is troubling that if you go into the bazars, you'll hear everybody is a vocal opponent of US foreign policy. So, they have the freedom to say it as long as it is not heard, as long as it is uninfluencial. That is good and all, in many places they cannot do that, but they have very little freedom to say it out loud and clear, the torture chamber awaits you. This is the disturbing fact you never hear about. Everybody is so scared to islamist extremism, nobody thinks about their basic rights.

      But, to combat extremists, the only thing you can do is to emphasize, they have rights too.

      Mubarak certainly has many qualities as leader, but it is very important not to turn the blind eye to some severe shortcomings.

      What this has to do with the Matrix is left as an exercise to the reader... :-)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    15. Re:So? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You, Sir, just proved yourself insensitive, arrogant and irrelevant.

      Insensitive, because you just suggest, from the comfort of your couch, that other people's lives should be put at risk. Speaking of death and suffering so easily is indecent. Try to improve on this and you might have a chance to become a human being.
      Arrogant, because you just compare a whole nation with nursery kids. You don't have a fucking clue about what's going on in Egypt. But that doesn't stop you from demeaning people who deal with the issues everyday. What makes you think you're better? What makes you think you would behave better if you faced the same problems? Do you have the faintest idea of what are the problems we are talking about?
      Irrelevant, because this is not an issue of rewarding good and punishing bad. Airing the Matrix is not a reward for the good people; protecting them from death and injury is. Airing the Matrix is not a punishment for terrorists; preventing them from spreading further death and chaos is.

      Heck, I'm rereading your post and I'm trying to put myself in an Egyptian's shoes. If I was Egyptian, I'd be infuriated by this. You don't have a clue, yet you talk like an expert (in a humiliating way) and you play with other people's lives because you don't care.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    16. Re:So? by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As an example; the UK government is considering an unhealthy food tax. [...] it is an example of the state forcing its view of good and bad on a population

      I'd like to discuss this one with you.

      Why should the taxpayers that take care of their bodies be subsidizing the health care of people who engage in unhealthy practices (smoking, alcohol, junk food, etc.)?

      It's like a gas tax. People who use the most gas, and therefore use the roads the most, are the ones paying the most to repair them. Similarly, people who draw the most from public healthcare should also be paying more for their self-destructing lifestyles.

    17. Re:So? by ZaMoose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've bought into the lie that Islamic terrorism is a symptom of poverty and repression. Certainly, it gains traction because the vast majority of Arabs live under repressive governments and are unable to advance their own condition, no matter their efforts.

      However, the vast majority of terrorists have been Western-educated, come from middle class families (at the very least) and would generally be considered part of the "elite" in their respective societies, with the exception of suicide bombers in Israel (which vary greatly in family background, although most are teenaged/20-something males).

      Please don't contribute to the incorrect "poor, repressed people acting out" meme.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    18. Re:So? by Zeriel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ironically enough, Muslim/Arab scholars used to be (during the dark ages) regarded as the most advanced scholars, scientists, and doctors the world had yet seen.

      It almost seems to me that a post a few back was right--that Islam is going through the same cycles as Christianity, we just have a 600-year head start.
      1. First few centuries -- marginal, growing religion that replaces previous religions.
      2. Next few centuries -- golden age of religious philosophy, learning, study.
      3. Next few centuries -- dark age of dogmatic fundamentalism, superstition, and religious rulership

      Repeat 2 and 3 ad infinitum. Hence, the Christian world is setting up for another dogmatic, superstitious, fundamentalist dark age.

      I'm going to go research some eastern religions (shinto, buddhism, hinduism) and see if they do the same thing. Anyone know?
      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  3. wow... by lingqi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think now how well Bruce Almighty will fare in Egypt just became one of the most curious questions I have about the movie industry.

    Or, heck, Dogma... (though they might like that one b/c they think it's making fun of the catholics)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  4. And How Do the People Feel? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And how do the Egyptain people feel about having this decision made for them by others?

    Funny how that question never seems to be asked, or answered, in these articles.

    You know, if the Kingdom of God and Heaven could be brought down by a movie, we'd of been standing in the shards of it long since.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by neksys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, thats what governments do -- they make decisions for the citizenry based on percieved need. You forget that in many parts of the world, religion is intrinsic to everyday life -- the Church in many cases is the State. Religion is hugely important to most of the middle east... I daresay nearly as important as the "war on terror" is to the United States, and you can bet your bottom dollar that the US government would intervene if a movie were to be released in the country showed terrorism in a positive light. Its all a question of cultural values. How do you feel that your government won't let you make "How to destroy government buildings for dummies"?

    2. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by den_erpel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wether or not they are egyptians, we have decisions about content made for us by others who think they can decide "for the greater good" of all. Us westerers should stop looking down on other civilisations, we have it too as this article clearly shows. Germans can't see Nazis, Australians can't see red blood and Americans freak on the sight of sex.

      I can understand the caution of the film board in Egypt, after all, they don't want to see another Karnak massacre by some bunch of extremists, backed by a number of news papers (which will deny all responsibility of course).

      Avoiding extremist religious fanatics is hard as it is, so why wait until people get killed? In this case, I guess it is a small price to pay, ...

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    3. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by gilroy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Blockquoth the poster:

      you can bet your bottom dollar that the US government would intervene if a movie were to be released in the country showed terrorism in a positive light

      You know, I'm fairly out there on the cynical limb right now, but I don't think this is true. They might want to ban something that affected national security -- say, detailed classified info on Secret Service procedures -- but they wouldn't try to stop a pro-terrorist message. For now, at least, free speech is respected.


      Which is irrelevant, of course, because Media, Inc. would never dream of inconveniencing its masters with such a film. It would never get made because the sheep would bleat too loudly. The American public, informed or not, would likely avoid such a movie; its prospects for profit would be small; and Hollywood would not back that horse.


      Which raises the question (a la Matrix): What good is freedom of speech, if no one is saying anything?

    4. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by neksys · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You know, I'm fairly out there on the cynical limb right now, but I don't think this is true. They might want to ban something that affected national security -- say, detailed classified info on Secret Service procedures -- but they wouldn't try to stop a pro-terrorist message. For now, at least, free speech is respected.

      I see your point, and to some extent I agree -- however, our hold on free speech is becoming increasingly tenuous. After having seen first-hand websites with vaguely anti-american, pro-terrorism sentiments be shut down under the PATRIOT act and associated "homeland defense" laws, I'm having an increasingly difficult time trusting the US government to "respect" the average citizen's right to free speech.
    5. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by SubliminalLove · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And here's another question for you:

      Does the fact that we can say anything mean that we should say everything? I've noticed a certain "anything that can be said, should be said" mentality in a lot of my fellow Ameicans, and I wonder how valid it is. Thoughts?

      My opinion at this moment, though it tends to waver, is that maybe it's a good thing terrorism-supporting movies aren't in vogue. Neither are movies cataloguing the mating habits of the turnip family. For speech to be useful, doesn't it need to have an audience?

      Anyway... my rambling is done... my karma remains neutral...

    6. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by DragoonAK · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The ones who demanded that the Parkers change the South Park subtitle were the MPAA Ratings committee, which is a private organization. The FCC didn't have fuck all to do with it. The Parkers caved because if they didn't get an R rating only art house theaters would show them, not because if they didn't they'd be arrested. There is a difference here that you're missing. Same thing with the movie scripts: they're made tamer than some wish because it makes more money, not because the government will ban it otherwise.


      This breaks down somewhat with regards to the TV and radio, as they're publicly regulated, and the Republicans have tried to do the same thing with the Internet, but the Courts have been very clear: the First Amendment does not allow the kind of government censorship that is widespread almost everywhere else.


      And you won't land in jail in the US for denying the Holocaust in an attempt to whitewash the Nazis: you're thinking of Europe and Canada, where they don't quite get the whole freedom of speech thing.

    7. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Germans can't see Nazis, Australians can't see red blood and Americans freak on the sight of sex.


      That reminds me of a pic I saw on rotten.com (no, I don't spend my free time there). Basically, it was a pic of a guy who was half-eaten by wild dogs. He was naked from the waist down. I later ran in to that same pic somewhere else, and it was otherwise identical, except someone had cencored the guys penis from the pic (that was clearly visible in the first pic). So, it was OK to show half-eaten guy (a REALLY disturbing pic), but it was NOT OK to show that guys penis.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    8. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by Shawn+Baumgartner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I treasure irreverence, even when taken to extremes, because among the outrage there lies those wonderful kernels of curiosity that the otherwise closed-minded might not have otherwise had the mental fortitude to face without having the issue thrown in their faces. The conclusion that they come to following such consideration isn't so important as how they came to that conclusion. I would much prefer it to yet another generation who maintain their most basic beliefs only because someone such as their mommies and daddies told them that was how things were and that was that.

      To use that example of movies that support terrorism (a bit broad lumping together all terrorists as being the same animal, as I don't see Islamic Jihad finding too much common ground with the IRA, so feel free to interpret "terrorism" as a particular group for clarity), I think that it would be refreshing to truly get to know and understand the perspective of those who would commit such heinous acts. We find it far too easy to have certain groups of people declared as "evil" and then read about them being summarily executed in foreign lands.

      Admittedly, the predominant attitude of "kill them all, now" would probably continue to dominate and perhaps even be accentuated after a better understanding is reached, but at least these death sentences would be delivered from a more informed perspective than that of blind fear. We might even be able to develop solutions that get at the root of the problem rather than simply treating the symptoms.

      As for the usefulness of speech, that is a stripe of a totally different color but one that is fairly self-regulating, since those who won't find it useful, such as those of us not in the turnip trade to reference your example, simply won't bother with it. Of course, that does make me wonder why these zealots are so deathly afraid of materials that make their people think, since they would likely walk away bored or find it to be highly comedic if they were so confident in their beliefs. But then I don't proclaim to understand the incredibly xenophobic world of those sort of religions, so I may simply be missing something incredibly obvious to those of you who do.

    9. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by Jonathan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you can bet your bottom dollar that the US government would intervene if a movie were to be released in the country showed terrorism in a positive light

      And _The Matrix_ *doesn't* do this? A bunch of incredibly self-righteous people hide from a more technological society, occasionally venturing out to do battle with the mainstream world. Innocent people get killed, but that's considered a-okay by the group's leaders.

    10. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by gilroy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      For speech to be useful, doesn't it need to have an audience?

      The point of free speech is not, necessarily, that "useful" speech occur. It's more a bastion against the thinking that the government can say, a priori, what is "useful", or what is "true". Should everything that can be said, be said? Probably not. Who should make that determination? The citizens, through the discourse they choose to hold.
    11. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by bludstone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you can bet your bottom dollar that the US government would intervene if a movie were to be released in the country showed terrorism in a positive light.

      Like Star Wars?

      --

      no .sig
    12. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by TheDredd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly: Mr Smith called Morpheus a terrorist in The Matrix

      One persons terrorist is the other persons freedom fighter

    13. Re:And How Do the People Feel? by kubrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Self-censorship is the worst kind of censorship there is, and that's what the post I replied to seemed to be advocating.

      The limitation of the discussion to Americans seemed interesting as well, as if they are the only ones with the right to an opinion on this issue... the reason I linked to David Hicks' web page was to show that other people are affected when Americans decide to chuck human rights out of the window, it's not merely an internal matter. If he's committed a crime, charge him. In a court. You know, laws and things. Don't just lock him in a cage and forget about him.

      (The Aussie Government isn't doing anything to help matters, of course. Bastards. About what you'd expect, given their record of attacking Iraq and Afghanistan while at the same time imprisoning refugees from those regimes in concentration camps in the desert. God, this country's fucked.)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  5. Wow by CptChipJew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The press launched a campaign to stop showing the movie, saying that it reflects Zionist ideas, and promotes Jewish and Zionist beliefs."

    I think that quote speaks for itself.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Wow by $carab · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Umm....I realize the Islamic press has a tendency to describe everything from America as Zionist...but in this case...

      You realize that the movie portrays the "last hope of humanity" as a city known as Zion, whose inhabitants are the result of a gradual migration and represent the forces of good, besieged by the forces of evil that surround them.

      So yeah, I can see how it could be viewed as promoting Zionist beliefs.

  6. My religion by Gorny · · Score: 5, Funny

    "..which are related to the three divine religions, which we all respect and believe in.." There is only one religion... and it's prophet is called Morpheus, it's Messiah Neo.

    --
    Alan Perlis once said: "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing"
  7. Overanalyzed Much? by Chromodromic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All this proves is how global our community has become ... and how Egypt can be just as susceptible to a bunch of overhype about pseudo-philosophy in a movie as a bunch of AintItCool.com readers ...

    "Matrix Reloaded" has as much to do with philosophy and religion as my dog's yawns. There are so many already well documented gaping holes and problems with the Matrix universe, that to read a search for God into this extremely Hollywood-ish movie--Keanu Reeves is our new Messiah? spare me--is only indicative of the starvation for spiritual themes that our culture is undergoing. It's like seeing God on the back of a cereal box--or getting God as the prize at the bottom.

    Which would suck, because the coolest thing I ever got was a propeller-helicopter toy that got stuck on the roof. Bummer. What kind of a Neo would let a little boy down?

    Well, there's one thing about the new religion, and I don't know if it's cool or not ... but at least the new Messiah can have hot monkey love with Carrie Anne Moss ...

    --
    Chr0m0Dr0m!C
    1. Re:Overanalyzed Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pseudo-philosophy? Riiiiight. Just because it raises issues that are well covered in philosphy, doesn't change the fact that it is philosophy. Saying it isn't philosophy, when it clearly covers philosophical ideas, is like calling a text book on Platos allegory of the cave, or determinism as is the case with reloaded, psuedo philosophy because, shock horror, it covers theories that have been well thought out and covered in the past. Perhaps you should actually go out and see the movie instead of regurgitating the opinions of the various film critics who didn't understand the movie, unless you live in Egypt of course.

  8. Congratulations Egypt by Syncdata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're the single silliest example of constrictive Theocracy in action.
    The matrix is banned because it questions your main sponsored religion/s? Keanu Reeves is a percieved threat to your rule?
    The matrix is about action. The philosophy aspect of it is not at all complex. If your political system can be overthrown by Keanu Reeves, one of two statements are true.
    #1: Your citizens are weakminded, foolish, and easily swayed.
    #2: Your hold on power is tenuous, and you cannot handle the slightest challenge to your authority.
    .
    My money is on #2.

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Congratulations Egypt by demonbug · · Score: 5, Funny
      Keanu Reeves is a percieved threat to your rule?


      whoah.

    2. Re:Congratulations Egypt by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      one of two statements are true.
      #1: Your citizens are weakminded, foolish, and easily swayed.
      #2: Your hold on power is tenuous, and you cannot handle the slightest challenge to your authority.
      My money is on #2.

      I wouldn't be so quick to rule out #1. After all, they have allowed the government to be put in place over them that fears #2.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:Congratulations Egypt by Frohboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm... this might be true, if Egypt had a theocratic government. They actually have a constitutional ban on religious-based political parties.
      (ref)

      Granted, there are significant religious pressures on their government (just as there are in the US, and in many other countries.)

      You really shouldn't make sweeping generalizations about a country you've never been to. That's what they do in Russia.

    4. Re:Congratulations Egypt by Eisenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course the USA would never censor or ban anything.

    5. Re:Congratulations Egypt by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Talk about an uninformed, self-righteous post!!!

      Ever travelled to Egypt? Ever read articles about the country from multiple sources (yes, that means other than Fox News)? Ever tried to genuinely understand what's going on over there and how Egyptians think?

      Egypt is NOT a theocracy. Egyptian law actually bans Islamist political parties. Because Egypt has a HUGE problem with radical Islamism. One that dwarfs 9/11. Islamist terrorism does not mean "once, 2 years ago" in Egypt. It means "every month or so".

      Egypt is not a full democracy either; at least not in the modern, western sense. Yet, they have made continuing progress on that path, considering that just 30 years ago, they were in a state of chronic war against Israel. They are now one of the most stable, reliable country in this region.

      You're so obscured by your binary (good/evil) way of thinking that you can't even read.
      "Such religious issues, raised in previous times, caused crises." Violence also played a part in the decision, the committee said. "Screening the movie may cause troubles and harm social peace," according to the statement.
      Remember, we're talking about a country that has a long history of war against Israel and is painfully trying to get over it. They are plagued by groups of armed Islamist terrorists. This movie portrays Zion as the last hope of Mankind, as a sanctuary where good is besieged by evil. They KNOW that the Matrix is going to be targetted by terrorists. Setting up a bomb in a movie theater is incredibly easy. I don't think either of your 2 statements are true. I would put my money on :
      #3: This movie is offensive to most of our population. Violent groups will use this opportunity to bring death and chaos. The benefits of airing the movie do not exceed the costs.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  9. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dont understand how people can not 'get' the scene with the architect. Perhaps you are attempting to read into it too much? Here's a hint: he says everything straightforward. There is no obfuscation whatsoever, nothing needs to be interpreted, the whole thing is 100% just plain flat-out said. You know, with words.
    So can someone please explain to me what it is they dont understand, and how they are capable of not understanding it?
    I suspect that a lot of "questions about the scene with with architect" are actually just "questions about the movie in general, which everyone already had or had developed their own theories for, which the architect raised but didnt answer, so that you'll go see the third movie, not because you just can't understand his obfuscated answers"

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  10. Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Matrix is banned cause it potrays stuff contrary to the 3 blessed religions by God (as the egptions put it) These three (Judaism, Christinity and Islam). Now further down there is a big flamebait about how the ban is really cause it potrays stuff about Judaism. Now isn't that very contradicting?

    I for one thought the whole Zion/Rasta image was some rastafarian thing :) Come on.. Zion is from Neuromancer.. everyone knows it.. and why is everyone almost black?

  11. heh by ffsnjb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the kid in the first movie should have said "there is no god." Instead of bending a spoon with your mind, it'd probably be a tad easier to convince the religious *insert_deragtory word_here* that there is no god.

    Nah, bending the spoon is easier.

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  12. Why not censor the first movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm thinking... why they didn't banned the first
    Matrix movie? After all, is in that movie where Neo is featured as some kind of messiah, while in Reloaded is rationalized as just "a necessary anomaly" that can be explained scientifically...

    Wait, maybe the fact that religion can be explained by rational ways is what these censors fear?

  13. What is the matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The movie taught us that "The Matrix" was a system of machines that enslave and delude the human race for their own ends. But what really is The Matrix in our world? I submit that the first level of The Matrix--as close as we'll get to it in our world--is not a society of machines enslaving people, but a collection of governments that enslave their citizens.

    Just as machines attempt to control the thoughts and minds of humans trapped in the Matrix, some governments attempt to delude their citizens and control what they see and hear.

    Ironically, the movie often showed computers as the technology that enabled the enslavement of humans. In our world, computers do just the opposite, and promise to be the technology that frees those who are enslaved.

    If you're reading this in a country that does not allow "The Matrix" to be shown, have hope. There ARE SOLUTIONS.

    'The Matrix' may have you. But free your bandwidth, and the rest will follow.

  14. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by bananahammock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks mate. Now I donâ(TM)t understand the architect and you.

  15. Multiculturalism in a nutshell by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    North America: Neo kicks the crap out of someone and then gives a passionate kiss to Trinity. R-rated for explicit sex.

    Europe: Neo kicks the crap out of someone and then says: "Oh fuck! Zion again. It's such a shitty place". British Board Of Film Censors (in 1984 renamed to British Board Of Film Classifiication, conveniently keeping the old acronym) gives it "restricted" rating for continuing use of strong language.

    Arabian States: Neo kicks the crap out of someone and then says: "Oh God! Zion again". Egyptian censors ban this film for explicit religious message

    It seems that the only thing all cultures of the Earth can unanimously agree to is kicking the crap out of someone...

  16. Not far from what people think here by bigmattana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While we have the freedom of speech here in the U.S., similar thinking regarding the fear of talking about religion is alive here. Religion these days is like sex was 100 years ago - nobody thinks it is appropriate to talk about, as if some sort of war or riot is going to break out of we talk about it. When will people understand that there can be both peace and difference of opinions and beliefs at the same time? If we think we have to neuter ourselves for the sake of getting along with others, then we have truly given up. We don't need to voluntarily self-impose such restrictions as Egypt is on our own talk and thoughts. I am glad that the Matrix 2 looks at some of these issues. (Though I am always a little worried when Hollywood does try to look at religious issues.) I think that part of the reason many people think the movie is so deep is that they had never thought about such things for themselves before.

  17. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't even tell where the fsck I am now

  18. Re:Unfortunatly by citog · · Score: 2, Informative

    The mobile phone with camera issue is touchy in a lot of places, including Saudi Arabia - the concept of privacy is involved. It's accented in Saudi because the people are particularly sensitive about having their photo taken without their permission. It is considered a strong violation of privacy. No different from places, in the West for example, that have banned mobile phones in locations such as gyms. On the grounds they may have these cameras that are not immediately obvious.

  19. Nope. Sorry. by Mr2cents · · Score: 3, Insightful

    which we all respect and believe in.

    Excuse me, I'm an atheist.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Nope. Sorry. by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not true. There are (by my observation) 2 main types of atheists:

      1) The ones who for some reason are upset (angry, afraid, whatever) with "God", and thus deny the existence thereof. Many of these folks are unhappy and a bit hostile. A lot of atheists get a bad rap because of this.

      2) Those of us who simply see no conclusive evidence for a god (or if you're afraid of commitment, you call yoursef agnostic :)), and so don't believe. These type of people are typically quieter about their lack of faith.

      The logic that 'you must believe to deny' is flawed... it assumes that faith is the default.

      I maintain that faith is trained into people, the default is probably to believe nothing (in the sense that we don't know language, social skills, etc. before we are trained.)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  20. Zion by jilbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the real reason they have banned it is that the city of free people in the film is called "Zion"! This also caused problems with the first Matrix film. The film makers have really shot themselves in the foot with that one!

  21. Life of Brian by bananahammock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This film was initially banned in Norway for blasphemy. It wasn't released there until 1980 - IMDB

    Western countries also have their skeletons in the closet.

  22. It;s really sad... by botzi · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...when movies with non or O(x) intelectual message are censored.

    The press launched a campaign to stop showing the movie, saying that it reflects Zionist ideas, and promotes Jewish and Zionist beliefs."

    Sure, and "Dude, where's my car?" was a strong social movie for the soviets GULAG's....

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  23. Re:BBFC gave it a 15 by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's no such rating as 'restricted', unless you meant R18.

    Indeed :-)

    However both The Matrix and The Matrix Reloaded were passed 15.

    And that's why there is no "motherfucker" in the scene where Trinity is supposed to say "Dodge this, motherfucker!"; contrary to the script, she just says "dodge this!" :-)

    And then again, shooting someone in the head is acceptable; you just cannot call him "motherfucker" while doing this. Am I the only person who considers it a little bit weird?

  24. The word "Zion" made me uncomfortable by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The word "Zion" made me uncomfortable. It seemed a little progaganda-ish, nothing to do with the plot, just using the word so much, drilling it into your head, just the psychology of using the word so much. It's such an overloaded word.

    I'm a rabid Isreal-backer, supported the war, and am more than happy to accomodate all Muslims who want to be martyred, but really, the concept of a state founded on a religion is really bullshit.

  25. attitudes common in the US as well by 73939133 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    which are related to the three divine religions, which we all respect and believe in.'

    Sadly, similar attitudes exist among US leaders; Here is a quote from Bush:
    No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.
    The only thing that is holding back people like Bush is a strong legal tradition of separation of church and state. But give people like Bush, Ashcroft, and their fascist pseudo-Christian core constituency a bit more time, and they will change that.
    1. Re:attitudes common in the US as well by elefantstn · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's pretty disingenuous not to note that the quote is from George HW Bush, not George W Bush, especially when you refer to the latter afterwards without differentiating between the two.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
  26. Pragmatic not Knee Jerk by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here, Here. Egypt is a secular state with freedom of religion, however its Government and society is under considerable pressure from a large minority of religious zealots. This is likely a pragmatic not a knee jerk action, given the Matrix::Reloaded is already available 'underground'.

  27. Nonsense. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bullshit. [Spoilers. Piss off.]

    The One (Neo) is the machines' last system of control; he's the result of those in the matrix having a choice---Zion or the matrix---and is part of the cycle in which Zion is created and destroyed. Neo is the sixth version of the One.

    Perhaps your friend has some different, PhD version of "nothing" he meant.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  28. About banning movies by Levvie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all, I do not agree with banning movies, I think it's to the individual to decide weither they go and watch a movie or not, but... afaik banning movies is something that happens all the time, I can remember a movie made by several countries telling their own story about the 9/11 attacks, it was banned in several countries (i'm almost sure the us was one of them) because the gouvernment decided it was a political/religious incorrect movie, also here in .be the movie was only available in a select group of independent alternative theaters for the same reasons. I don't see any difference between these facts, exept that the matrix reloaded is a famous movie in a great part of the world. Just try and respect the fact that others may find it harmfull for there own religion/politics, as we might think the same way about theirs.

    1. Re:About banning movies by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ' Just try and respect the fact that others may find it harmfull for there own religion/politics, as we might think the same way about theirs.'

      the other conclusion is that the governmebts should not have been banning movies that present uncomfortable views on 9/11

  29. This is why p2p networks are so important by cnycompguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why p2p networks are so important, to keep governments from censoring media, and help keep the flow of information going.

    1. Re:This is why p2p networks are so important by DrMrLordX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gee, I wonder how many Egyptians have broadband . . . no, I wouldn't download Matrix: Reloaded on a modem, would you?

  30. Re:The one thing I didn't understand by KillerLoop · · Score: 2, Informative

    scenes from the prior versions of the matrix. for each reaction Neo shows in the current incarnation of the matrix, his reactions in older versions are shown too. well, my guess at least.

  31. Re:No... by KingRamsis · · Score: 4, Informative

    then the perceived Divine Right to Leadership enjoyed by the government is destroyed. No government wants that.

    That is one nice speculation coming out of your ass, I'm Egyptian and living there actually and I tell you that the government is totally secular and the fact that the average Egyptian believes in God or not has nothing to do with the government right to rule, however there are laws against insulting other religions. Tsk ..tsk ..tsk typical American stereotyping.

  32. Re:The one thing I didn't understand by SolubleFrank · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my mind it was either:
    a) Neo's many conflicting reactions on all forms of consciousness.ÂÂ
    or
    b) The Architect's list of every possible way Neo could react.

    --
    Feed me a stray cat.
  33. Re:Yeah, within a virtual system by DarkZero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you not noticed that everyone who sees The Matrix is a philosopher for a day?
    They normally would laugh at the thought of reading Descartes, Plato, Baudrillard, Nietzsche, etc, but when they see the pop-culture, hollow corpse of the afore-mentioned writers works, they are automatically philosophers.


    Currently, there are two possible results of pop culture:
    1. Philospher for a day who has become interested in the basic philosophical questions raised by the Matrix
    2. "Wow, that chick's tits were AWESOME , dude!"

    Thanks to the Matrix, pop culture might be on a slow climb upward. Don't try to fuck it up and send us back to Captain Horndog's Big-Tits-Big-Guns-Even-Bigger-Tits Bonanza just because pop culture hasn't gone from zero to Philosophy Major in 3.6 seconds. When someone mentions the basic philosophical questions that are raised by the Matrix, maybe you should politely point them toward Descartes instead of mocking their enthusiasm for something better than Die Hard 460: Die Harder Than You've Ever Died Hard Before WITH A VENGEANCE.

  34. Here's what Egypt WILL allow... by Elias+Israel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently, in order to get Egyptian commentators to argue in favor of freedom of expression, you have to broadcast a blatantly antisemitic miniseries, complete with Jews plotting world domination with the old Russian "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" forgery.

    Well, it's good to know they have some standards.

    Pathetic freaks.

    1. Re:Here's what Egypt WILL allow... by harmonica · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it's good to know they have some standards.

      Schindler's List was banned in Saudia Arabia because it was too pro-Jewish, Babe was banned in Malaysia because a pig was the main character. All very sad.

    2. Re:Here's what Egypt WILL allow... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is that any worse that the usual Hollywood trash of arabs always being portrayed as evil terrorists out to get the US?

    3. Re:Here's what Egypt WILL allow... by jamie · · Score: 3, Informative
      Worries about "harming social peace" also didn't seem to bother them when the hit Egyptian song "I Hate Israel" hit the charts a couple of years ago. In fact the Egyptian state censors got involved then, too, but for a different reason...

      I hate Israel, and I hate destruction, it (Israel) loves destruction
      I love Yassir Arafat and he is very dear to me
      Egyptians are sad
      I hate Israel and I love Amr Mousa
      I hate Israel and Shimon (Peres) and Sharon
      Why should the children suffer why should they die everyday
      People carrying weapons and others carrying slingshot
      I hate Israel, and we all do
      We are all mad, Al Quds matters to us
      I hate Isreal and Ehud Barak because no one can stand him
      Egypt puts up and stands till the end but when it got mad it pulled back the ambassador
      I hate Israel because of south Lebanon, Al Quds, Iraq, Syria and the Golan?
      I hate Israel and I say it even if I will be arrested

      In a further twist, the head of Egypt's arts censorship bureau said the song originally ran "I don't like Israel", but Shaaban spiced it up at the request of the censor. "Originally it was 'I don't like Israel', but I made a recommendation that they choose another word equal to the state of people's feelings," said Madkour Thabet, whose office has the power to ban tapes deemed politically or morally offensive.

      http://www.arabia.com/life/article/english/0,11827 ,46609,00.html

    4. Re:Here's what Egypt WILL allow... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2
      I think this is a very valid and good point. I'm still trying to decide whether or not I should be outraged at an anti-Semetic based TV series.

      On one hand, it's entertainment. It's not real - it's presenting a fictional world and having characters move through it. If I'm going to say that they shouldn't disallow the Matrix: Reloaded because it's fictional, it would be hypocritical to then deny a series about a Jewish conspiracy.

      Then again, there were and still are people in the US who believe that there is a Black Conspiracy to take over the world from the white race. (Not to mention the afore-mentioned "Jewish Conspiracy," too. I guess if you're in a wacko group conspiring to take over the world, you expect a lot of competition.) If there were a TV show about a Black Conspiracy trying to overthrow the American Way of Life (SM), I think I'd be quite pissed about it and might very well argue that it should be taken off the air. At the very least, I wouldn't watch it.

      Isn't that the same thing? They have a show portraying a common stereotype. Is that neccessarily wrong? There are plenty of shows that exploit common stereotypes (even the Simpsons uses them for parody). But generally these shows do not portray things in an "us vs. them" view and have one group trying to repress the other.

      Is it hypocritical to cry out against shows that seem to compel people to carry out violence against a certain group, and then at the same time argue that video games do not provoke people to violence? If I think that people know the difference between videogames and reality, why should I be upset about a TV show that is also not reality?

      I don't have any answers to this. Stereotyping will usually give false impressions about people. Having a stereotype isn't necessarily a bad thing, as long as you can recognize it and know that not all people who fall into the category will immediately be as expected. Reinforcing a negative stereotype is a bad thing. Maybe that's the out - such a thing will reinforce negative stereotypes, and that's what makes it wrong. But is that enough of an "out" and are we guilty of doing the same things?

      The only thing I'm sure of is that I don't like people acting violently against one another. Everyone is better off when everyone agrees to allow others to coexist. But I'm not sure that the ends necessarily justify the means to get there. It's just a TV show, but it's also can reinforce views about people, possibly causing people to decide to commit violent acts. But only possibly. It could all just be good fun for the majority of viewers.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  35. Re:Fuck you Egypt by KingRamsis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most advanced civilization that ruled the earth you stupid ignorant son of a bitch, we built the great pyramids that survived for thousands of years that you cant even replicate today, we controlled gravity, and we were so advanced in medicine that we had a doctor for the left eye and a doctor for the right eye go figure that out you, we taught the world how to farm, we are the essence of civilization and a never ending legacy.

    So do yourself a favor and creep back under the rock you came from.

  36. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by DrMrLordX · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was horribly disappointed by the first movie. I have no compelling reason to see the second one unless they release a "Abuse Keanu" edit of the film that features nothing but Neo getting his ass kicked(and I doubt that would have much footage anyway?).

  37. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by jago25_98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    me too, well a bit anyway.

    I don't really enojoy action. The thing I came for was the storyline.

    Now, the storyline was good but there wasn't much of it in this one. Where were the suprises and tragedys? It was nearly constant action.

    It feels like they've tried to draw out 2 films into 3.

    Having said all this there was one scene that made all the shallowness and pretentiousness ok, much like Yoda fighting in the last Starwars.

    It's a lot more enjoyable if you think you can read into it, but there's actually not a lot of depth in the end - God, Judas, the Devil, blah blah

    Hopefully I'll find something new though, and the next Matrix COULD be better. At least this film has lowered a few expectations for the next.

  38. You must not be human by aidfarh · · Score: 5, Funny

    since the Architect explicitly told Neo, that because he was human, there were some things that the Architect said that Neo wouldn't understand. Therefore, anybody who claims to understand 100% of what the Architect said, cannot possibly be a human.

    --
    There is no sig.
    1. Re:You must not be human by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
      All right you pukes here it goes:

      The universe does not have a beginning or an end. It has a center and the details get fuzzier as you extend outward. Not how our picture of the world grows less detailed as we try to peer into the past, or try to guess into the future. The same applies with distance.

      So all of these nuts trying to go back to the good old days, and all the cults waiting to the end of the world are frankly full of shit. The universe exists, right now, at this very point in space and time.

      Picture it like a lightbulb illuminating a dark field. As you go further out, it becomes dimmer and dimmer until it fades into absolute nothingness.

      So now that I've removed the time constraint, the next question is what do we do with the time we have here? What happens after our time is up? What were we before we were here? Is there a God? What is God?

      The world is a giant episode of Sienfield. There is no instrisic purpose. Our curse as a species is needing to have a purpose, and to that end each of us strives to try to live one. Believe it or not, that struggle IS our purpose.

      What happens after our time is up? You die and start your life over again from the beginning. Ever experience Deja Voi? That's your soul remembering a good idea or a bad idea from the last trip around. Remember Sisiphus from the greeks, pushing the rock up the hill, only to have it fall down again. That's us folks.

      Now some enlightened souls finally do figure out how to escape from all this. Generally it involves ceasing the push the rock. The unfortunate and VERY uncomfortable fact of the matter is that you are then in complete control of your life, and there are absolutely no gaurentees as to what is out there.

      What is God? God is the collective conciousness of our entire civilization. Each one of us is like a cell in the body. That's why God generally doesn't dig war, murder, theft, or deceipt.

      Can you pray to God, sure. But his/her/its ability to alter reality to fit your present crisis without taking something away from someone else is limited. You can pray for world peace, but not for hockey teams or hitting the lotto.

      And yes, some people CAN bend the rules. Indeed every advancement in technology involves some small bit of magic that science later justifies be altering the "rules." You can't do anything too weird without having a lot of people believe in you though, there seems to be some sort of power we all have to impose the status quo.

      Now all of you can start your flamefests of disbelief.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  39. don't be alarmed by sivann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is usual, movies are banned all the time, and the next week/month they are un-banned. Most of the times it's a marketing trick.
    I once went into a movie here in greece called "naked lunch" by Cronenberg, it was on 1-2 theaters, and the theater I went had only 5-10 viewers. A policeman came 10 minutes before the end and stoped the movie! He said it was banned because of showing drugs, and of course the next week it was in the theaters again and the theaters were full!

  40. three divine religions by gnalre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Islam, Christianity, Jedi?

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
  41. It has been revealing to read this article ... by torpor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... and obvious, that there is much to be learned by the Western/American {there is no difference any more} constituency of /., about the ways of the world.

    Honestly, I was shocked to see so many posts along the line of "Egypt sucks, what a lame country, how weak"...

    Matrix is widely regarded as an allegorical story, pitched in modern technological terms, regarding the lost races of Zion and the Jewish struggle for freedom. If you don't know that Zion is not just a place in a ass-kick movie with 3D effects, then I suggest you put google to use and learn just *WHY* the name "Zion" has so much stigma associated with it, and why many firmly believe that the Zionist movement is a destructive one for the human race as a whole.

    Egypt is a very, very, very religiously fervent land. In Egypt, religion is actually more important to the general populace than the ability to be sitting on your ass in a dark theatre like a vegetable, being placated by wonderous 'miracles' of technology, being delivered a sermon on modern living by the modern Western priesthood (Hollywood).

    For many people in Egypt, religion is a way of life, not just something you buy a ticket for on the weekends.

    Americans think that "The Matrix" is just entertainment, and to their culture, an integrated part of the entire experience of being "Free".

    Actually, from an objective view, Hollywood *is* the American Religion in that many modern Americans formulate their personal views, moral conviction, and yes ... even 'spiritual inspiration for living' from this media rather than ... say ... other media such as the Koran or The Bible.

    There is little difference between the Matrix-nerd waxing philosophical about 'the meaning of a film called Matrix' and a devout Muslim who holds a firm belief in the wisdom of Allah.

    Really, very little difference whatsoever - both are using cultural mechanisms to bring some bearing of significance to their lives.

    If the Egyptian government, in deciding not to allow this film to play among its populace, is doing so in order to protect its culture from strife - and nobody knows better than the Egyptians how cultural memes can cause strife - then in so doing it is no different than the US Government, deciding that 'digital rights' should be enforced and rigorously protected in order to safeguard its economy.

    Remember this:

    Just because Egyptians do not worship your gods, does not make them worthy of ridicule.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  42. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Anyone else here horribly disappointent by Matrix: Reloaded?

    It's pretty hard to be disappointed by a movie staring Canoe Reeves. I mean, to be disappointed there has to be some sort of expectation that it's not going to suck in the first place, and, let's face it, brother can't act to save his life (Bill and Ted is a modern masterpiece though, don't get me wrong). Although frankly I thought Larry Fishburn was more than disappointing: he does Shakespeare regularly, he was Cowboy fucking Curtis -- why'd he have to suck? I've seen popsicle sticks give less wooden performances. The only redeeming performance in the movie was Agent Smith, who was just hilarious.

    But getting back to your point -- the first movie was a little too "gee-whiz" with their adolescent philosophy, but at least the plot held together, more or less. But after a zillion fanboys telling them how deep the movie was, and seeing press clippings mentioning their names in the same sentence as, say, Plato or Kant or Buddah or whatever, the Whatemacallem brothers decided to lay the weirdass metaphysics on a little thick in the sequel. And what happened? The movie wasn't pseudo-cryptic, or an interesting conversation starter for people who think solipsism has to with worshiping the longest and shortest days. Nope, it just plain didn't make sense. Like you said, a bad story.

  43. Religion in, rational thought out. by panurge · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm not surprised by the Egyptian reaction. It was frankly stupid and insensitive for the makers of Matrix reloaded to use emotive words with years of history like Zion and Trinity. Wars have been fought over the definition of both of them. Sadly, as someone with connections to Reform Judaism and non-Trinitarian Christianity, I believe that the present Government of Israel (and not, please, Jews or the bulk of the Israeli people) has so disgraced the word "Zion" that its use should be subject to the greatest care.

    To give an example, how would US fundamentalists react if the Egyptians made a film in which evil Southern baptists launched an attack on a society presented as being good but called "The Third Reich"? Not, I guess, favorably.

    Anyone who has read Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses will know how difficult the whole area is. Although it was ostensibly attacked by Iran for being blasphemous, the real reason for the attack was Rushdie's description of an Ayatollah in exile, which was uncomplimentary to say the least. Mubarak may not be a democrat or hugely lovable by Western standards, but he has largely held Egypt together without it collapsing into fundamentalism. Egypt is a better society than much of the Middle East. The last thing he needs is Taliban inspired crazies going berserk over a movie that presents "Zion" as the good guys, and using this as a lever to attack the government. I suggest that college-age kids who don't get this probably need to obtain passports and visit the region, and LISTEN. Perhaps if enough of them do, one day we'll get a government with a clue about the Middle East. But I'm not holding my breath.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Religion in, rational thought out. by XianDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It was frankly stupid and insensitive for the makers of Matrix reloaded to use emotive words with years of history like Zion and Trinity.

      I only wish you were kidding. Let us always remember that we need to protect everyone from everyone else by constantly monitoring our speech and language. By your logic, if a circus clown had killed my father and you started talking about what a great time you and your kids had at Ringling Bros the other night, you're just being stupid and insensitive. Give it a rest. The film-makers owe no obligation to anyone but themselves to use the language and nomenclature that they find creatively appropriate. 'Stupid and insensitive' is not only narrow-minded and uninformed, it is worse, an ad hominem attack that has no reasonable basis. (And if you have any doubts regarding the validity of my criticism, consider how uninformed I must be about whether you truly are narrow-minded and uninformed).

      I personally would love to see any movie involving evil Southern baptists. It is a sad state of affairs that there aren't more of them as I know many Southern Baptists quite well and I hate to say it but... they are in fact evil. I don't find and value in your analogy, at least, I didn't find anything particularly offensive with the concept.

      Egypt is a better society than much of the Middle East.

      I'm not quite sure how you make this value judgment. What is your conception of 'society' and do you honestly think that one country alones trumps the entire collective character of all the others. Your comment needs a fair amount of elaboration if you want to be taken seriously.

    2. Re:Religion in, rational thought out. by jake007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was frankly stupid and insensitive for the makers of Matrix reloaded to use emotive words with years of history like Zion and Trinity.

      First, you can never please everyone. We would have no books, no movies, in fact we would have nothing if we always caved in and self-censored.

      Second, what should be so insensitive about Zion (Sinai)? That's where - traditionally - the Jewish code of law was given and note that both Christianity and Islam relate to it. Why not show a movie which treats it creatively, yet with some respect? There's nothing wrong in playing with items from our shared heritage if it's done with sane mind and has some artistic quality.

      ...the present Government of Israel has so disgraced the word "Zion"...

      That's a serious accusation but you bring no evidence. First, the present government of Israel has been democratically elected, just like every government in Israel to-date. Can you say that about Egypt which you call "a better society than much of the Middle East"?

      Second, being democratically elected the government represents the majority of its electorate. Your excuse that you don't mean, "please, Jews or the bulk of the Israeli people" is lame.


      it [Satanic Verses] was ostensibly attacked by Iran for being blasphemous

      You miss the point. It is Mr. Rushdie who has been attacked, his life turned upside down because otherwise Iran's Islamic rulers would have had him long killed by now!

      Your advise? He shouldn't have written a "difficult" book. That's the wrong advise. You must never give in to criminals and those who pervert human values. Instead, you hunt them down (if possible) and punish according to their crimes. This is the major tenet of our Western civilization as we know it - we define what our rights are and defend them. If we don't, soon we won't have any left.

      how would US fundamentalists react if the Egyptians made a film in which evil Southern baptists launched an attack on a society presented as being good but called "The Third Reich"?

      US fundamentalists?? Do they decide what we get to see on the TV? Do they censor the newspapers? If an Egyptian made a movie as you describe, I think pretty much noone in the US would give a damn. Try to come up with a better analogy.


      You mention Taliban. Hm, you are right we don't want them in Egypt. Does it help then to not screen Matrix and instead show the Protocols of Zion, made up by Russian Secret Police to blame an economic misery on the Jews? Does it help to smuggle TNT belts to Gaza so that they can be used to blow up busses with people like you and me in them? Does it help to issue building permits for mosques but not for churches even though Egypt sports a sizable Coptic Christian minority? Look up on the net how many of the 9/11 terrorists were Egyptians, how many of the virulently anti-human Islamic preachers active in mosques in the UK and US studied their craft at the state-controlled Egyptian University of Cairo.

      Before "letting a rational though out", please get the facts straight first. Thank you.

  44. had it banned already... by jeremie_z_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... for it's obvious hollywoodesque crap with kung-fu combat and MTV-like state of the art wrapping. you can call this a troll as i didn't see the sequel but just got that impression from the first one. i guess my adolescence crisis is over by now... the real Matrix for me lies in Gibson's work, not in expensive mortal-kombat-like exhibitions...

  45. Zion... by mongbot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The capital of the survivors in the Matrix is called "Zion" - the name of the mythical Jewish homeland. Egypt has been at war with Israel not too long ago, and there is huge resentment towards Israel because of the occupation of Palestine.

    It would be the same if there was a major movie released in America where the hero's name just happened to be 'Osama Bin Laden' (not that I'm drawing any significants comparison). Of course there would be uproar, and the movie would not be shown by most theatres regardless of it's artistic quality.

    1. Re:Zion... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it wouldn't. There is a big difference between public uprorar, movie theatres refusing to show something, and a government ban. There is lots of material out there that is only available in certian outlets because the public doesn't like it. A good example of something actually not too extreme is the Anarchists' Cookbook. You aren't going to see this out in front in Barnes and Nobles, but it is available and legally so, amazon.com seels it for example. It is the sort of thing that the public does not approve of and, all said and done, law enforcement would rather not have in public hands. Yet it is available.

      The public has a right to speak out against things they don't like and refuse to buy them. Movie theatres have a right to choose not to show a film for any number of reasons. However if the government decides to ban something outright, that is very different. I am quite sure that if a movie came out that made terrorists out to be heros it would be villified in the US. No major theatre would show it, no normal movie store would sell it or rent it. However I also firmly believe it would not be banned by the government. If you care to do some digging, there are plenty of books out there that villify America and make us out to be evil, books that you can buy and read in America.

    2. Re:Zion... by zer0vector · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would imply the Bible was factual, which it may or may not be.

      --

      ----
      Striving to put right what once went wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap, will be the leap ho
    3. Re:Zion... by utahjazz · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Zion" - the name of the mythical Jewish homeland.

      And non-mythical Mormon homeland. Many businesses and places in Utah are named Zion, as the Moromons think of Utah as "our Zion".

      But typically if you say "Zion" in Utah, you are referring to Zion National Park.

      Visitors to Salt Lake often notice the big statue of Brigham Young downtown faces away from the Temple, with his hand outstretched to the Zion Bank building.

  46. Social Unrest? by SluttyButt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Zionist's idea has suffered through ages, and the fact of its survival scares the hell out of anyone who hasn't gone through this generations of unceasing trials.

    To know we have fears, and to come face to face with it - to learn what the Zionists has learned, could be beneficial.

    Egypt's fear will be it's own undoing.

  47. Re:Truth versus Belief by apdt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like to offer an alternative definition for belief...

    belief is the acceptance of something that you cannot prove absolutely.

    There are very few things in the real world that can be proven absolutely. For everything else you have to go on the balance of evidence.

    --
    I lay awake last night wondering where the sun had gone, then it dawned on me.
  48. Those strange egyptians... by JadedFAQer · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not like there were any cats in the film, I see no reason to get fussy.

  49. Re:Truth versus Belief by cioxx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Truth, the real deal, stands on it's own.

    And what if there are few versions of the truth? Which one out of those stands on its own?

    Truth != One
  50. Descarte to Popper in one easy step... by iainl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "we all know that Descarte's duality is bogus, right?"

    Of course, at this point we all start mentioning the fact that Popper, when arguing against the "two worlds" theory called his third world the Neosphere, and start running around saying its all planned from the start.

    See how easy it is to read things into stuff?

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  51. more spoilers by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because of Neo's strong connection to her, he wasn't going to say 'fuck you' to the Architect and blow the whole place up. Blowing the whole place up would lead to the death of everyone in the matrix, and coupled with the destruction of Zion would lead to the extinction of the human race.

    Of course his car-flipping fireball scene means that he is willing to break a few eggs to make an omlett.

    you know, one person who does hate all humanity, the matrix and all machines is Smith. What would happen if he infected everybody in the matrix, and then decided to commit mass suicide?

    All the machines would be starved back to a "leve of existence we are prepared to accept" which must surely suck, and the humans would be left with however many people are alive in zion after the sentinels are through with them.

    Smith hasn't happened before (Smith 1:"Everything is exactly like last time..." Smith 2: "Not exactly...") and it would be a typical W bros thing to do to have neo fight smith on behalf of the machines.

    Poor Smith. He's the only new form of life on the planet in 2100 years. You'd think that he'd deserve some time in the sun.

    Speaking of which, why haven't the machines used their technology to construct some kind of space elevator to a geosynchronous solar satellite thing yet? Isaac Asimov and Arthur C Clarke thought that that would be a great way to get free power, and it's certainly smarter than their current plan of

    1) liquifying the massive amount of human flesh we saw in The Second Renaisannce into human goo.

    2) resurrect just a small portion of humans to efficiently convert the goo into bioelectricity and heat

    3) get all stroppy when some of the people decide that being fed their dead ancestors intraveniously sucks and that they want to wake up.

    I mean, c'mon machines! fossil fuels and hubris sent humans to the stone age at least twice! don't make the same mistake of thinking that there'll always be more oil/human goo twice!

    1. Re:more spoilers by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of which, why haven't the machines used their technology to construct some kind of space elevator to a geosynchronous solar satellite thing yet? Isaac Asimov and Arthur C Clarke thought that that would be a great way to get free power, and it's certainly smarter than their current plan

      That's one of those massive plot holes that you have to overlook if you want to enjoy the movie. Really, you have to go even further back and ask how the earth's leaders thought that scorching the sky (and thereby destroying the planetary ecosystem and killing off every living thing on the planet) was a viable solution to the problem. A case of the cure being worse than the disease.

      Obviously, the machines don't have a defense against EMP blasts, so why didn't mankind detonate a bunch of nuclear warheads over 01?

      Also, in regards to the energy generation issue... the machines have this massive drilling capability... so why aren't they using geothermal heat to generate electricity?

    2. Re:more spoilers by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All the folks in the Matrix are being fed human goo? I had wondered about that. Even if dead human puree is on the menu, the system would still break down, energetically. With machines expending energy, there needs to be some input on the basic level, the difference between the (total calories of human goo in first generation - total calories expended by machines during next generation)

      Unless, the machines only need a relatively small amount of people to power the matrix, and so far they've not run out of 6-billion+ human-gooage, doing a good job at rationing it over the years while they look for a mean of primary production.. Eventually they will need it- energy from the sun- in form of solar panels or plants.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:more spoilers by ArmorFiend · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Excellent point. My friend also has a good point, that the machines may have a built in "first law of robotics" that they've twisted to the point where they can kill individual humans, but its against their programming to commit genocide. So they come close to the knife's edge and kinda hope Neo will make a bad choice and do their dirty work for them - by killing off humanity.

      The matrix was originally an attempt by the machines to create a new garden of eden for the humans, but humans kept on eating the forbidden fruit of choice, and waking up. The current matrix is a shitty place to live but you do have free will.

      The "coppertop" generators are obvious bullshit, as has been pointed out by this post's aunts&uncles. I can add to that the "Cow argument". Given the choice of enslaving docile, non-kung-fu-knowing cows, and rebellious, intelligent humans, both of which produce about the same body heat per food ingested, which do you enslave if you're interested in a stable slave population? Cows. But maybe the cows are all extinct? Well even some random stomach bacteria do a pretty good goo->heat conversion, and every human carries a lot of those, and they don't really need humans to thrive.

      I think that in movie 3 we'll find out that the "real world" above the matrix is also simulated. The characters will be like "oh my god", then a smug villian will be like "what? you bought that `coppertop` thing? That was a dead giveaway, you fools".

    4. Re:more spoilers by Rinikusu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who said any of that is even happening?

      For all we know, the entire "human race as a battery" paradigm is something invented by the machines and fed to the those who escape "the matrix" (into another matrix) to help convince them of their plight (and to keep them from wondering if they are truly out of the matrix).

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    5. Re:more spoilers by hiryuu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2) resurrect just a small portion of humans to efficiently convert the goo into bioelectricity and heat

      It was my understanding that the Wachowski bros. had originally conceived of humans being used as a massive parallel-processing system, but that the notion was lost on the studio execs and/or the execs thought that people wouldn't be able to understand that concept. This, of course, would fit in with the need for the Matrix to exist for brain activity - if people were only needed for the power-producing capabilities (which has already been beaten to death as impractical/impossible, lossy system, etc.), then it would make more sense to have them cerebrally brain-dead. A bit of twisting and stupidity later, and the parallel-processing was ditched for the power-plant, with the Wachowskis, I'm sure, hoping no one would notice/care.

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
  52. Pirated VCDs and P2P will beat censorship by Quizo69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having lived in a country that has no copyright laws (PNG) I've seen the proliferation of imported pirated VCDs and recently DVDs sold openly in every shop.

    What will happen in a country like Egypt is that pirates (the real, organised crime gang type) will simply supply the demand which will be there, because the more affluent Egyptians will have read about how the Matrix: Reloaded is a kick arse movie and wish to see it.

    Furthermore, those with internet connections (there will be plenty) will download the inevitable DivX release and share it with their friends, thus spreading it through yet another channel.

    This is why censors are becoming irrelevant in our technological society. In Australia censors have recently banned "Ken Park" from even screening at a film festival! No matter that it aired at Cannes etc, we're apparently not mature enough to form our own opinion on the matter. The same goes for Egypt, in this case though it's based on religion instead of sex, but it always sees to be the trinity of Sex, Politics and Religion that people feel they must suppress for the good of the populace. So when "Ken Park" is released on the net, it too will be downloaded and watched, regardless of what some censor in an office says we should or shouldn't watch.

    "The premise of censorship is that offensive content contaminates the hearts and minds of people. But you can only have censorship if someone can judge content without himself being contaminated. This contradicts the premise of censorship, which alleges that these contaminating powers exist inherently in the offensive material. On the other hand, if a censor can censor without being contaminated, that implies that offensive content does not automatically contaminate the mind or heart of a person. In that case, you would be admitting that censorship is unnecessary. That is the contradiction of censorship." - don't have the name of the quoter sorry.

    Quizo

  53. As an American who resides in Egypt.... by Soul+Colossus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was very dissapointed to hear this a few days ago as I and many of my egyptian friends have been eager to see this. I moved here just over a month ago with my father and since I'm now in a 3rd world country I've had to give up many indulgencies of American life such as viewing movies when they're released. This commitee defintely does NOT accurately reflects the views and beliefs of Muslim Egyptians I know here, the Matrix is pretty freaking popular. As far as reflecting Jewish/Zionist beliefs, that's just a crock of hot, steaming shit, they're just making up their excuse as they go along, especially as Jews aren't taking a liking towards here. Now I'll have to resort to pirating the movie so as an athiest and American I will get to enjoy it without all the corruption it would supposedly hearld.

  54. Re:Truth versus Belief by spongman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Firstly, there's no absolute truth outside of abstract though (mathematics, logic, philosophy). As soon as you start talking about nature, the "real" world, you instantly have a lack of data. Everything becomes a matter probability. As for the existence of God, statistically the probability is zero, but with a finite margin of error. I liken the existence of God to the health of Schrodinger's cat. You don't know he exists until you die.

    If you die and discover that God does exist, can you be certain that he existed before you died?

  55. Re:Nonsense....spoilers by Joey7F · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Precisely! The coolest part of the movie relates to what you were saying.

    Neo "Something feels different"

    Then he precedes to stop the sentinels in "real life".

    Hmmm...interesting, isn't it? Those in the matrix have a "choice", but choice is "merely an illusion between those who have power and those who do not". Zion is part of the Matrix! Picture the "Matrix" as been a little "for loop" inside of a bigger matrix.

    I can't wait for Novemember.

    PHd's don't mean anything, if you get them in a useless subject.

    As a slight aside, Neo is always the "One" because when he talks to the architect one of the monitors says "There were three before me!" or something to that effect.

    --Joey

  56. Congratulations, Wachowski Brothers by Featureless · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is better than winning a fucking Academy Award.

    Your work has been recognized by the government of Egypt for being "too damn good."

  57. Re:No... by kikta · · Score: 4, Funny
    Tsk ..tsk ..tsk typical American stereotyping.

    Uh... isn't that a stereotype, too?
  58. Re:Got all that... by TephX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some words in the Architect's speech are completely superfluous (for example, there's no reason for him to say "apropos" when he does, and it's even slightly nonsensical in context). However, the vast majority of it is just a long, convoluted way of saying the same things that others have said in their summaries in this thread. I have no doubt the Architect's speech was designed to confuse a reasonably high percentage of the viewers (he could have said everything he did far more simply). But it also creates an interesting effect for those who look a little deeper, as it seems at least plausible that an earlier AI program (remember, the Architect created the Matrix, so he's pretty old) would favor using a lot of technical terms so as to be as precise as possible.

    --
    I metamoderate all Redundant and Offtopic moderations as Unfair.
  59. Close...but just a little wrong. by mcoko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Neo makes the choice that will cause the Matrix to fall and kill the entire human population, including Zion.

    If Neo chose the door to HIS right (the left of the screen from the Architects perspective) then Zion would fall, the Matrix would RESET and NEO could choose 23 people (17 female and 6 male) to join him in making the new ZION and start the whole damn thing over again (the seventh Matrix/Zion).

    If Neo chose the door to HIS left (the right side of the screen from the Architects perspective), then he could save Trinity but it would cause a feed back in the Matrix destroying it and killing every human plugged in. Also the sentinals would still destroy Zion.

    Neo made the choice to save Trinity therefore condeming the entire human race (Matrix plugies and Zionites), but he knows there is something he can do. For one he can affect the sentinals in the real world (is it really the real world? hmmm). And two why would he make that choice and then admit that there was nothing he could do (in response to Morpheus asking what had happened, that Neo was a piece of the CONTROL just like everything else, Oracle, Crazy French Guy, etc.)

    I guess we will have to wait and see how they FIX the Matrix so that the entire human race doesn't die.

    Or maybe the Woz Brothers agree with many that the human race's worst enemy is itself and they will let it happen. Time will tell

    --
    www.fotoforay.com
  60. Re:Fuck you Egypt by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Alas, all these things ARE true for a culture that existed 2,000+ years ago.

    Sadly it is not a culture of today.

    Today the tribes of the area are too busy killing each other in the name of a dozen religions. They're too busy filling their souls with hate and killing off the dissenters with the odd ideas which will become the next medicine or math or a myriad of other futures. They're too busy protecting their own stuff/turf/wealth/power to worry about what could be.

    Y'know, cut just one zero out of that first sentence and you could be talking about the US ;-)
    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  61. Re:BBFC gave it a 15 by tonyl · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We watch movies of murder, and we censor the breast

    Well, duh. as should be obvious to everyone who has ever seen one, breasts are very, very dangerous.

    Not as bad as penises though. Those things can poke your eye out.

    Seriously: the general fear of anything sexual is sick. Not that sex isn't a powerful emotional force that needs respect and careful handling. But I think on balance we'd be far better off with more sex and less violence.

    --
    -- Tony Lawrence
  62. Sounds like China by bakuretsu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    '...it explicitly handles the issue of existence and creation, which are related to the three divine religions, which we all respect and believe in.'
    ... Because we thoughtfully shelter the people from everything else.

    I wonder if Egyptians can search for "Buddhism" on Google ;-P
    --

    --
    The Bailiwick - DESIGNHUB2005
  63. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... **SPOILER** by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That... or how the hell he stopped the squidies when he was OUT of the Matrix (or so we thought)

    Your observation they are still inside the Matrix is correct, backed up by several other events in the movie. Some of them are really subtle and I cannot recall. One is not so subtle and quite memorable:

    The spoon bender in the first movie insisted "there is no spoon". Why is there no spoon? Because they are in the Matrix. The spoon becomes a symbol at this point for what does not exist as a result of where they are. The boy gives Neo another spoon as he's leaving Zion, but he does not change his message. He simply gives him the spoon. The message is unchanged: "there is no spoon", ergo, you're still inside the Matrix.

    I think most people will agree, given that and the Sentinal scene in the end where Neo loses consciousness, that people in Zion are still inside the Matrix. Neo, having mastered control over Matrix reality, is "beginning to believe" here as well. How he might have realized this, I do not have any theory on. This concept will be crutial later on because I think it will apply to Agent Smith as well.

    What's really going to bake your noodle is why do the machines need to destroy Zion with a conventional attack? They literally allow Zion to be created, fight with it for a while, then eventually send a massive army to wipe it out. If the machines controlled the Matrix, why not just "delete" Zion?

    The answer? I believe that both the machines AND humans are trapped inside of a Matrix. Both of them are enslaved!

    Think about what the Oracle said to Neo when they were talking about how he could trust her. Neo asks, "why are you helping us?" She replies, "I'm interested in one thing Neo, the future. And I know, the only way to get there is together."

    From this I conclude that while there are some humans that realize their reality is fake, there are some programs that realize the same thing. Somehow there needs to be a collaboration between the two if they are somehow to free themselves.

    There's some support for this in the teaser trailer.

    You see an army of Agent Smiths that appear to be standing in the surface desert, with hover craft surrounding them. If Smith is merely a Matrix construct, how can he exist in the "real world"?

    There is a scene with Neo and Smith fighting where they hit each other and both fly back. Amidst this, a shot is inserted of Morpheus stating with much shock and disbelief: "he fights for us!?"

  64. in relation to Animatix by ramzak2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you seen the Animatrix DVD ? There is one part there, where the humans try to give a machine a chance to chose for itself, by introducing it into the matrix, to support the humans. *That* concept is what will play a major role in the 3rd part. Neo is a machine that has chosen to fight for humans. I plan to pull up this comment after seeing the revolutions :) Let it be here safe till then.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:in relation to Animatix by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bzzzt. Wrong. Machines don't bleed and they don't go around falling in love with ugly women or making babies in totally unrealistic sex scenes.
      Thanks for playing, though!

    2. Re:in relation to Animatix by jonabbey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You missed the part that "Zion" is itself in a higher-level Matrix.. that's the whole point of the Architect's speach, of Trinity's ability to Kiss Neo to save him in the first movie, of the Oracle's ability to make predictions that encompass events outside "The Matrix", and of Neo's ability to take down the sentinels at the end of Reloaded.

      Neo could well be a machine, according to the rules we seem to have at the end of the second movie.

    3. Re:in relation to Animatix by donutz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neo is a machine that has chosen to fight for humans.

      Close, actually.

      Neo is a program that is triggered when a certain condition of the unbalanced equation manifests itself. Neo is programmed to believe that he is human, and is programmed to act human, and is programmed with the free will to convince people that he is human. Neo's choice to fight for the humans only comes about as a result of his programming, and the inclination of those in the matrix who believe there is a "one" who can save them.

  65. Re:And fundamentalists are so peace loving! by TomV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... islamic fundamentalists a such a peace loving people, committed to the continuation of "social peace" and avoid "crisis" at all costs.
    ...which might have some relevance here if the government of Egypt was an islamist fundamentalist government, rather than a secular government which has for decades been in 'crisis', trying to cope with an ongoing islamist fundamentalist revolution which has killed many hundreds of people and nurtured several of the most hard-core 'afghan' commanders. There's been no 'social peace' in Egypt for a very long time, and past experience suggests that allowing the showing of a film which portrays a supposed 'promised land' called, of all things, Zion (not provocative at all, eh?).

    'Their social problems' are obviously not the result of western movies. However, their social problems do mean that the showing of this film could cause the sort of unrest that gets cinemas bombed. Which is turn leads to people getting killed. That's killed as in dead, as in bereaved relatives in mourning, as in families without breadwinners, as in, well, if you've had to deal with the death of a loved one you know what I'm talking about. Not as in 'OK, so roll me up another Agent Smith and let's continue the groovy action sequence'.

    The government of Egypt is, effectively, more than 20 years into a civil war against the fundamentalists, and that does make a difference in this sort of decision. If it was Saudi Arabia or Iran we were talking about (or Yemen, Sudan, Pakistan, plenty of others to choose from) then, yes, it would be ludicrous. But it isn't. Very sad, yes, but while I'm entirely free to sacrifice MY life for my beliefs in freedom of speech, expression and so forth, I have absolutely NO right to sacrifice someone else's life for anything at all.

    TomV

  66. The movie equates the machines with Egyptians by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In my last journal entry, written after seeing the movie early (which nobody commented on, thanks guys!) I brought up a bit of symbolism that I haven't seen anybody else point out.

    In the living quarters area of Zion all of the area around the door frames are painted blood red. This struck me as an obvious reference to the passover. The residents of Zion are waiting to be delivered from the machines and have marked their doors. So if residents of Zion == Jews escaping Eqypt, then the machines == Egyptians.

    One can see how this film got banned in Egypt if the force that keeps nearly all of humanity enslaved is equated with their country. Not the most mature attitude, but you can see how this would happen.

    Interestingly, in the Animatrix, there are scenes straight out of the Ten Commandments in which the machines are depicted as the Jewish slaves, building pyramids, and the humans as the Egyptian slave drivers. I wonder if the Animatrix is banned as well.

  67. Religon is so much fun! by Quixadhal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love religious debate... it's so much fun because it almost always breaks down into "Prove it!" vs. "You have to believe."

    It's understandable that Egypt (with a rocky political situation these days, and a strong Islamic population that, like its two brethren religions, is not know for tolerance of conflicting ideas) might want to exercise a little caution in how the philosophical/religious views of The Matrix are presented... but to ban something entirely because you're afraid to let people draw their own conclusions is just going to make it worse.

    What Egypt has done is declare this film to be forbidden fruit. The younger people will now go to every extreme to find that movie and watch it, and they'll make more of it then they would have if it were just another flick, because it's on the forbidden list!

    Consider, people under the age of 21 (here in the US) usually make a big deal out of consuming alcohol -- they get older friends to buy it for them, they get fake ID's, they do all kinds of things because the perceived value has been elevated by the fact that they can't just go buy it themselves. About 1-5 years after turning 21, the charm wears off, and it just becomes another item on the shopping list.

    I suspect you can extend that concept to any illegal substance, but that's a different debate.

    Religion and Science are not as different as both sides like to think. They are both predicated on logical systems built up from fundemental "facts" which have to be taken as faith.

    In science, we build systems of proof which allow you to extend a concept, using the assumption that the underlying concept was correct. Hence, we can talk about molecular bonds in terms of the interaction of subatomic particles... using the assumptions that those subatomic particles work as we believe. Make that a recursive algorithim, and you're on your way to defining the Universe by science.

    In a religion, the depth of the predicate tree is usually much shorter. We describe how the world came to be, and why things are, and why we should act in certain ways. The ultimate predicate for this is that the Creator said so.

    The difference between the two is that science breaks things down far enough so that it becomes difficult to fragment into factions. Unlike most (other) religions, scientists are generally willing to modify their belief system when another theory makes more sense. Example: Relativity vs. Quantuum Mechanics. For decades, those have been two rival belief systems, but now they are resolving their differences and merging those systems to get a step closer to God (The Unified Field Theory).

    Imagine, for a moment, how interesting it would be if the various religions would take a similar approach...

    But, people always have strong feelings when they get ideas in their heads. Denying the "truth" of one man's interpretation of a single line in the Bible is just like telling a computer scientist that a bit can be half on, or SCO/Caldera that they don't matter anymore. They'd rather fight to defend their belief, than have to change the way they see the world around them.

    At least it's entertaining... :)

    1. Re:Religon is so much fun! by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Religion and Science are not as different as both sides like to think. They are both predicated on logical systems built up from fundemental "facts" which have to be taken as faith.

      Ah, but the nature of that "faith" in both systems is different.

      In science, that faith can always be questioned, and the process for redefining your assumptions is formally defined. In religion, there is no process (within the system) for redefining your base assumptions. The change must come from outside the system. (i.e. social and environmental events and pressures)

      That's not to say change only comes to the base assumptions of science from science itself. In fact, it's historically been more likely to come from outside. But, at least in the orthodox religions, there is too much resistance to change and no formal mechanism for change in the first place.

  68. Religion that delicate? by chonet4444 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's always amazed me how delicate religion seems to be. I mean really: "'religious themes' of the film's storyline, about the search for the creator and control of the human race, may cause 'crises'".

    Apparently it's exceedingly easy to point out that the emperor has no clothes, at least when it comes to religion.

    Either that or one piece of fantasy (the movie) can easily supplant the older fantasy (the religion) in the minds of the rubes (the worshippers).

    Just my $.02.

    Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.

  69. Re:Fuck you Egypt by KingRamsis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well being Egyptian I'm certainly more qualified to judge that more than you, I live in Egypt and we are all Coptic here some of us are Muslims and some are Christian, being Coptic is about ethnicity not religion.
    When Islam spread to Egypt some people willingly converted and others remained Christian which tells a lot about the tolerance of Islam, if Muslims simply killed all those who disagree with them there will be no Christians in Egypt today.
    I will throw in another piece of information there are some big families that have a common ancestor and both Christian and Muslim branches of the same family.

  70. A Bit More by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently, nobody realized that All American movies were banned in Egypt right after "Dude, Where's My Car?"

  71. Believe in all three? by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 2, Interesting

    which are related to the three divine religions, which we all respect and believe in

    How can a person believe in all three religions?

    I mean, a religion addresses every issue, even if it is, "We can't understand that now, only an infinite [G/g]od can" or some type of metaphysical "such a question is meaningless since there is no reality blah blah blah".

    But in order to have three religions there has to be some distinction, and that distinction would lie in how these issues are addressed. And a person can't believe in two or more distinct/separate "answers" to the same issue since one would negate the other.

  72. Re:BBFC gave it a 15 by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

    And then again, shooting someone in the head is acceptable; you just cannot call him "motherfucker" while doing this. Am I the only person who considers it a little bit weird?

    Shut up, motherfucker.

  73. Re:I'm glad you mentioned this... by BobRooney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " Finally we get something that, while possibly on the level of freshman philosophy (possibly; I don't agree)"

    Granted the philosophy is decidedly Cartesian and is very simplified to fit the venue, however, the numberous religious and historical references that exist in Matrix: Reloaded should not be overlooked.

    Consider the Meruvingian: a French-speaking, french culture loving "program" named after the Ruling family in France/Central Europe during the Dark ages ~500 AD or so. Consider that this family claimed to trace its bloodline directly to the child of Mary Magdalane and Jesus Christ. Due to this somewhat "blasphemous" claim, the family was betrayed by the Roman Catholic Church and diposed in favor of Charlemagne and his family (read "betrayed", as humanity arguably was by its machines). Further, their current decendants are believed to be the fabled "Illuminati" and control groups such as the Freemasons. THE Meruvingian is a reference to the eventual heir of their family's bloodline who is storied to rule over a united Europe as a sort of "chosen one" or "savior".

    Back to the Matrix...I submit that the Meruvingian was the FIRST "one", just as Neo is now the 6th. Also, his wife Persephone is what seems a possible eventuallity for Trinity.

    So maybe the philosophy is a bit heavy-handed, but if you dig a little deeper you'll find some of the more obscure references in the movie hold a lot of "more than Freshman college level" ideas for pondering.

  74. Re:The one thing I didn't understand by KevetS · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone else notice how in the 1st movie, in the scene where Smith & Neo meet for the first time and Neo is being interrogated by the Agents, the shot is zooming in on what appears to be a screen with a white border around it almost as if it was from the perspective of someone (*cough* Architect?) watching this happen on screen. Go back and watch the scene to see it for yourself.

    --
    This is my United States of whatever.
  75. CPU POWER by glenrm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It could be that people are really used for their processing power, Neo's day job was writting code, it makes more sense than as a power source.

  76. Re:Almost by Surak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, I'll admit, I was previously unclear on the concept of Zionism. I tried to google for 'Zion' and came up with nothing but a bunch of Christian churches. Maybe I should have googled for 'Zionism'. ;)

  77. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... **SPOILER** by kjd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Oracle never tells Neo he isn't the one. Go watch the scene again and listen more carefully to her words. She tells him what he needed to hear, just like Morpheus said.

    Think about how the story would be different if she flat-out said he was the one (when he still didn't believe it yet), or flat-out told him he was not (without telling him he would have to choose between his own life and Morpheus').

  78. My 10 bits by Ryosen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ** spoilers ahead **

    The impression that I got was that each screen represented one possible way that Neo could develop and progress. Remember, he's part of the Matrix, fulfilling a prophecy, exhibiting "supernatural" abilities. He's a program, as we've been told by the Architect, with a pre-determined outcome. Prophecies *are* foretold, after all.

    Each screen started out with Neo at birth and began to progress through all the various different possibilities that would exist in his life. Each possibility was determined by the choices that he made along each life. We're told, tho, that the free-will within the Matrix is an illusion. That it's programmed in. Each person might be making their own decisions, but those decisions are still within the boundaries and constraints of the system that they are in.

    Further proof that the outcome is predetermined is seen when each of his "lives" lead up to the meeting with the Architect and fall into sync.

    It never mattered which pill Neo took. The outcome would have been the same.

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    1. Re:My 10 bits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You have to look at the parallels between what Neo was "prophecied" to do and the Merovingian's (sp?) rant on choice.

      In the Matrix, prophecy is the same thing as calculating choices. It's like if I take some kinematics equations from physics and describe where an artillery shell is going to land, and calling it prophecy.

      The Oracle is just a "prognostication engine" that knows everything (kinda like having the ability to understand a "save state" in an emulator) and can calculate choices by decision-making agents in the future.

      It mattered which pill Neo took, in a way. But he never could've not taken it; every choice in life is predestined. Given a choice, and the sum of all of Neo's experiences, Neo will always choose one path.

      If I didn't explain determinism well enough, here's the first relevant Google I found.

  79. Three religions? by Shimatta1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And those three religions would be...let's see...Discordianism, Deism, and....I know, Jedi! ^_^

    Shimatta
    Hail Eris!
    Your Mileage May Vary

  80. Re:Matrix as code by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
    > Is there really this war between humans and the machines, or is it part of a larger scheme of control operated by other humans?

    I'm surprised nobody picked up on the kid in the early part of the movie who handed Neo the spoon.

    Neo1 through Neo5 decided the Architect was lying, and gambled that "the source" or whatever would set 'em free. (Instead, it was just a trap that "reloaded" the Matrix, like Ghosting a drive. OK, bug caught. Reinstall.)

    Neo6 figured the Architect might not be lying. So screw it, pop through the second door and see what happens. Maybe the Architect's worried that meta-Matrix will crash (which would suck for him and for humanity, if that's where the AIs actually "live"). Or maybe not. We (the viewers) and Neo6 don't have enough information to say.

    But sure enough, when Neo6 goes back into what he thought was the "real world", "there is [still] no spoon". Zion, the seekers, everything he thought was real was just a higher-level matrix, destroyed and reloaded five times before. It's just another level of control.

    So Movie III is gonna be Neo6, who jumped into the meta-Matrix and just discovered that There Is No Spoon, versus (or working with!) the "free" version of Agent Smith, who somehow figured out a different way to jump from the Matrix into the meta-Matrix.

    Wonder how Free Agent Smith (he's half-AI, half-newsreader? :) will react when he finds out that what he's been programmed to believe is the "real world of the machines", and that he thought he was defending when he got Zion whacked, is also just a higher-level Matrix.

    > It raises the question that it's not impossible that we ourselves are in some kind of simulation, or are indeed simulated. There would be no way to tell, which perhaps is the problem that the Egyptian censors have with the film.

    "It raises the question", heck, for the offended religion in question, you coulda stopped there. :)

    > If nothing really is real, then nothing really matters and you're left with the philosophy of the marquis-de-sade. Not something any civilised society really wants.

    Not quite. If nothing really is real, then nothing "really" matters and you're left with having to (as the Oracle put it) "make up your own damn mind" on how to live. IMO that's something many societies could benefit from, and something most religious societies are extremely threatened by.

    (And IMNSHO, that's a feature, not a bug :)

  81. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by lpret · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, the architect said that Neo wouldn't understand everything that he said, so it's natural, and almost required, that we don't understand it all either. It's not just straight words, there is more, no one fully understands it yet, but that's the point.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  82. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I dont understand how people can not 'get' the scene with the architect. Perhaps you are attempting to read into it too much? Here's a hint: he says everything straightforward.

    Yes and no. The Architect is Yaldaboath, the blind god of Gnosticism who believes he he created the universe for his purposes, when all he created was the deception we see around us. He is opposed by Sophia, wisdom. Read some Phillip K. Dick and *The Nag Hammadi Codices* is you want to understand what the Architect is doing.

    My guess is that the Oracle has a plan for Neo that is outside the scope of the Matrix's purpose for the One.

  83. Re:Perhaps the censor can explain... **SPOILER** by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or more correctly, the Oracle explained that Neo is not the One, "not in this lifetime anyway". Thus, Neo was not the One, not until he DIED, and was "reborn". New lifetime, and now he's the One. Perhaps it's stretching the definition of "lifetime", but it definately fits.

  84. An Explanation by an Egyptian by tabdelgawad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Probably too late for this to get noticed (7 hours is an eternity in slashdot time), but here goes: Regardless of what the official reason for the ban is (religion, etc.), the real reason is the constant and sympathetic reference to 'Zion' in the movie. In the real world, 'Zion' refers either to the "Jewish people" or "the Jewish homeland that is symbolic of Judaism or of Jewish national aspiration" [Merriam-Webster] (i.e., Israel in modern times). The (very real, 100+ year old) ideology of 'Zionism' didn't get that name for nothing. So this has little to do with pissing off fundamentalists or offending religious sensibilities, and a lot to do with pissing off the general population of Egypt, who are already susceptible to conspiracy theories of Jews controlling Hollywood (and the White House). As evidence of my explanation, I'd like to point out that Speilberg's excellent _Schindler's List_ was also banned in Egypt, ostensibly on the grounds that 'editing out the sex scenes would endanger the artistic integrity of the movie', or some such bull, when of course the real reason was the sympathetic portrayal of Jews. Finally, I'd like to point out that the movie will probably be widely available in VCD/DivX format, and will be watched by many on computer screens in Egypt. The government doesn't really bother enforcing censorship at that level, because all they want is to have *their* hands clean of officially permitting the showing of a 'pro-Israel' movie.

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  85. Re:Got all that... by TephX · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know the common meaning of "apropos". The Architect's usage of it sounds strange because 1) it's too obvious to bear mention that Trinity (Neo's previous one-word line) is the subject the Architect was discussing in the antepenultimate line, and 2) I've never seen that usage before - and since I am at least familiar with the term itself, something which I don't think you can assume for most viewers of the movie, that usage must be rare indeed. It sounds like a speech affectation that somehow made it into the dictionary, actually. While I'm at it, other examples of things that sound odd (trying to go with only issues that are relatively close to the surface, not deep plot speculation) in the Architect's speech:
    • "Pertinent" and "relevant" are synonymous, so saying that something is both pertinent and irrelevant is an oxymoron.
    • "creating fluctuations in even the most simplistic equations" sounds very odd given the way we use the word "equation" - an equation can't fluctuate. Presumably he is using this as a technical term to refer specifically to the type of equations (or functions, more likely) needed to instantiate an environment such as the Matrix.
    • "allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program" - must be jargon for some of the issues involved in the Matrix. Not comprehensible without more explanation of how the Matrix works, but probably not meant to be - just some "technobabble" to reassure you that something technical is going on here. Or this might be illuminated in Revolutions.
    • "There are levels of survival we are prepared to accept." This line is ambiguous. I assumed when I first saw the movie that the level they were prepared to accept was the current state, although it seems that most others thought it meant that the machines could still get by - albeit at a lower level of function - without humans.
    • "Your five predecessors were by design based on a similar predication" and "Already I can see the chain reaction, the chemical precursors that signal the onset of emotion, designed specifically to overwhelm logic, and reason." Either the Architect likes to use the word "design" in a heavily metaphorical manner, or something really weird is going on here.
    --
    I metamoderate all Redundant and Offtopic moderations as Unfair.
  86. What the hell is Zionism? by boy_afraid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, I hear Zion [ism | ist] everwhere in The Matrix and everyday news. So, WTF is it? Is it an idea or place? Why the f*ck are the Muslims all against it? Why the f*ck should they care? Why do we, the U.S., not care if everybody else cares?

  87. The End of the Movie: Explained by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Zion is actually a collecting area for people who question the programming of the matrix. The machines invented a prophesy to keep the humans busy warring against the machines, and not question the "real" world.

    Unfortunately, sooner or later someone comes along who WILL question the "real" world. That person is "the Anomoly". The computer's answer: wipe out Zion, and keep the Anomoly busy re-creating a new Zion. Indeed, there is some implication that the machines designed Neo to fill this role. (Note how many abilities he has in common with the Agents.)

    What is happening this time is neo is an anomolous anomoly. He doesn't go with the plan, and takes the emotional "save the princess" option instead of the logical "save humanity" option.

    The machines of course are very concerned. If the anomoly rejects the programming they have so carefully crafted they have no idea how everything will turn out. To a mathematical equation, chaos is the end of the system. With Neo free to do what he will, flouting the rules, people who ordinarily wouldn't question the matrix are.

    They have a mess, and it's going to end badly. They seem to have a "shotgun and canned goods" backup plan, but the Architect didn't seem to thrilled by the prospect.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  88. It's the Zionomy, stupid, was Re:Almost by bourne · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Islamists call the people of Israel and all countries that support Israel (esp. the U.S.) 'Zionists', referring I'm sure to Mt. Zion...

    To be precise, they are referring to Zionism, a racist ideology very popular in Israel.

    Based on the rest of the comments throughout this entire topic, I can only conclude that the average /. reader slept through their history classes.

    To wit: yes, the Egyptian censorship is about Zion (in the movie) and Zionism. The fact that most people missed this implies they don't know what Zionism is.

    Zionism refers to a Jewish movement that arose in the late 19th century in response to growing anti-Semitism and sought to reestablish a Jewish homeland in Palestine.. To dismiss it as "a racist ideology very popular in Israel," as above, is to ignore the roots of the mideast conflict.

    Put simply, Zionism was a movement based on the belief that as long as the Jews lived as ethnic minorities in other countries, they were going to be discriminated against ("discriminated" meaning "killed and robbed whenever public tension needed an outlet" - read up on the Pogroms sometime). The Dreyfus Affair convinced a reporter named Theodor Herzl that the only solution was for a Jewish homeland. He founded the Zionism movement, with the goal of creating a Jewish state. This movement slowly fought for progress over the next 50 years (see also the Balfour Declaration)

    Fast-forward to 1948. After 6 million or so Jews were killed in the Holocaust, the survivors got serious about a homeland. With lots of leftover guns lying around from World War II, they founded Israel. In doing so, they resorted to terrorism, and displaced much of the non-Jewish palestinian population.

    None of the neighboring countries wanted to absorb the Palestinians, and something like 6 wars have been fought since then. So, for the Egyptians, Zionism represents a massive local disruption which they've lost wars over.

    So-called "Modern Zionism" is the "racist ideology" referred to above, which basically boils down to "Jewish Israel - love it or leave it." To focus on it and ignore over 100 years of history is short-sighted.

    1. Re:It's the Zionomy, stupid, was Re:Almost by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

      You left out the part where, the very day Israel declared its independence, it was attacked by Syria, Iraq, Egypt, and Lebanon, without provocation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  89. The Fools! by weston · · Score: 2, Funny

    Architect: "Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the matrix. You are the eventuality of an anomaly which, despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision.

    Clearly, to simplify the Matrix they're using Gausian Elimination techniques, but each entry in the Matrix is only represented with limited floating-point precision! Of course they're going to end up with error terms -- not to mention wild inaccuracies or maybe even a singularity....

  90. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2

    Can you imagine Neo being somebody else than Reeves? Really, the Keanu-bashing is grating my nerves.

  91. When censorship and reason unit... by fzammett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It never ceases to amaze me how perfectly reasonable you can make censorship sound if you really try. What I mean is, the way the censorship board's decision is worded on the surface sounds completely reasonable, well thought-out and actually in the best interest of the Egyptian public.

    Then you think for half a second longer and of course realize that censorship in any form is one of the horrible things people can do to other people.

    But, when you see a statement done this well, you can see why people allow their freedoms to be taken away little by little for the greater good and then wake up one day and wonder why they can't even drive to the next town over without going through two weeks of paperwork, or read a book without being condemned as a Satan-worshipper and burned at the stake.

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
  92. Re:Almost by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A) You expose your own position by referring to Israeli Zionists as "the Jews". That's no different than me referring to Hamas as "the Muslims". In other words, perhaps you should consider your own views before casting around stones like the word "racist".

    B) Most Palestinians really aren't fundamentalist Muslims. Just because fundamentalist Muslims elsewhere use the Palestinians as a rallying cry doesn't mean much. Many (if not most) Palestinians are nationalists first, and Muslims second (and not necessarily fundamentalist in their view of their religion).

    C) Neither side wants minority power in a secular state. The gap dividing the peoples resulting from years of war and killing is simply too large at this point in time. Thus both sides seem to agree that a two-state solution is preferable right now, and hopefully closer cooperation and friendship will come with time and peace.

    D) I think you are grossly lacking in historical knowledge if you think Zionism is a reaction to Palestinian relations. Zionism is a reaction to European anti-semitism over a very long duration of time. Zionism has nothing to do with violent attacks against Palestinians - these are policy issues of Ariel Sharon and the political hawks on the Israeli far right. Israel's parliamentary system is partly to blame (the coalitions that include ultra-conservative elements and the like). Unfortunately, the Palestinian political scene is equally galvenized, and rejects moderate leaders like Mr. Abbas.

    E) Racism is a loaded word, and Americans seem to get all hot and bothered whenever we use the word (as do Europeans). Liberals - bah. When you see a group of young black men walking down the street dressed a certain way, you behave in a rational, self-protecting manner by crossing to the other side of the street. Does this mean you are a racist? When you set up checkpoints to prevent suicide bombers from entering your city, does that make you a racist? Something to think on. I will be the first one to say I wish Palestinians and Israelis could work out a way to get along, but I think people like you do a disservice to everybody when you cast the issue in such ridiculous reductionist terms. Not to mention the finger pointing, which is absurd, since you can go back and forth for hours finger pointing and never get anywhere.

  93. Matrix Reloaded is the quest for the holly grail by peu · · Score: 2, Flamebait


    the old symbol of masculinity was an inverted V which is ^ (today it retains the ^ part)
    the symbol of feminity was the opposite=V
    the holy grail is a symbol
    the cup is how whe know the grail resembles the symbol of feminity V, the uterus (also called the matrix), the V formed in the pelvic area

    so: feminine =V masculine=^

    at this point we can say that the quest for the holy grail is the quest for the holy woman or the sacred feminine
    who destroyed the sacred feminine? = the church

    why?

    in the begginings of church times, it was believed that the way to god is in the union of man and woman
    the culminant moment of that union is orgasm (still used today: did you saw god face? when talking about sex)
    church have its roots on the bible
    the bible was written by men, who wanted to put a man as the leader, a man as the god
    so, if now to see god is enough with a man, you must throw the woman out of the loop.

    then, again at this point, whe can agree that the quest for the holy grail is the quest for the sacred feminine, the quest of the V, the quest for the MATRIX

    who is against of the revelation (revelation is quasi the name of the next movie: revolution) of the truth of the grial? = the church

    why?

    because it means erasing 2000 years of bad propaganda for the woman, begining with blaming her of the original sin, for being inferior because she was created from a rib of man, and for saying that Jesus woman was a prostitute

    whaaat?

    Jesus wasn't divine, he had the bloodline of the families of King David and King Solomon, which means, he was meant to be the king of jewish.
    Being in his 30ies jesus, a Jew, was supposed to be married, or at least with a woman, at that time was the same.
    in fact he was married... with maria magdalena
    look in the painting by Leoanardo DaVinci the last supper, who is on jesus right does she look like a man? not at all, she is in fact MM, jesus wife, seated at his right. And speaking of symbology, look the figure formed by Jesus and MM, a big V right in the center of the picture.
    Maria Magdalena was no prostitute at all, she was in fact a descendant of Benjamin, another jew tribe King.
    this union have desdendants.

    say whaaaat?

    exactly, now it seems logical to thing that the quest for the holy grail is not the quest for the holy woman, but the quest of whats inside the holy woman, inside the V, inside the uterus, INSIDE THE MATRIX
    To reinforce this, Holy Grail root is Santo grial, whis is rooted in Sangreal, which also is rooted in sangreal, and if you split sagreal you have sang real, sangre real, and you guessed: holy blood

    does it make any sense the MATRIX-GRAIL relation yet? not really, I go on

    Its supposed that MM was pregnant at the time of jesus crucifiction, she was rescued by jesus uncle and moved to Gaul (Rome province, actually France) which was cared as a king daughter by the local jew community

    This holy blood line developed in secrecy in france, and is believed that the founders of paris were in this line too

    guess their names: Merovingian

    ring any bell already?

    What does the merovingian hides in the play? they hide the keymaker, an obvious allegory of the keystone which reveals the secret of the holy grail.

    This secret is protected by the line of the holy blood, the templars and a secret priory: the priory of sion (look the web for it) which is believed that Leonardo Davinci was part, along with the merovingians, isaac newton and many others.

    priory of sion, ring any bell already?

    so, its time for my conclusion:

    all of the neo's questions about what is the matrix, are in fact questions on who are his parents, his origins.

    or better yet

    neo is still insi

  94. The Irony by codethug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish I had posted sooner, my observations seem a little under-represented.

    I find great irony in Egypt being the one to ban The Matrix Reloaded. Many of you are aware of Gnostic themes in the Matrix, what some may not know is that it appears that stories of the Egyptian godman Dionysus factored heavily into Gnosticism.

    After Alexander the Great's successes, he decided to create the greatest city in the world as Alexandria in Egypt. After his death, Ptolemy was determined to also make Alexandria the intellectual capital of the world. The Library of Alexandria contained, by some accounts, the sum of the world's knowledge at that point. It held important works by the greek mathematicians; notably the Pythagorean Brotherhood, Diophantus' Arithmetica and Euclid's Elements. It also held many early philosophic and gnostic works.

    Of course, first Julius Caeser, then Christians and finally Muslims took turns at destroying the Library, and with it probably nearly a thousand years worth of Math. All in time, coincidentally, for the Dark Ages.

    Yeah pretty boring stuff. I'd rather see Carrie Anne Moss in Latex, huh. Regardless of why you like the Matrix, or what you believe, when seen through a historical context, there is irony to this story.

  95. NGE: a bit of history. by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Informative
    Neon Genesis Evangelion was an animated TV series broadcast on TV Tokyo between October 1995 and March 1996. It was made by Gainax, the legendary "by fans, for fans" Japanese animation studio which also produced such efforts as "The Wings Of Honneamise" and "Nadia".

    If you are not afraid of spoilers, here is a very good summation of the whole original series.

    There was a great deal of fan consternation about the "anticlimax" nature of the series, so when Gainax got enough of a budget together, they did not one, but (again, beware spoilers) two movies to further explore the concepts originally put across in the series. (I don't know why I wound up with three Australian sites for this info...I'm not Australian.)

    In any event, "Death and Rebirth" and "End of Evangelion" were a wrapup of the narrative in the series. However, no matter how neatly Evangelion creator Anno Hideaki had wrapped things up, the true meaning of the Evangelion universe continues to be a huge topic of debate. Sort of like how the true meaning of The Matrix movies are becoming a huge topic of debate...there, I brought this back on-topic.

    Anyway, it has been announced that a live-action Evangelion movie (the series and the two movies were all animated) has gone into pre-production. Gainax, ADV Films and Peter Jackson's Weta Digital effects studio are all part of this effort. For a movie which will, by necessity, have to have quite an epic sweep, the resources of these three partners which have been revealed so far seem far too limited to execute the plans. Perhaps one of the Seven Families of the Movie Industry is a part of this plan. Perhaps more than one. But the big financing has yet to be revealed. So take this all with a grain of salt.

    It was this possible live-action movie to which I was referring to. If they are true to the original series and the two animated movies, they will piss off a lot of religious people in all "three great monotheisms." Just like Matrix Reloaded seems to have done in Egypt.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  96. Re:Matrix Reloaded is the quest for the holly grai by mcowger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dude, we're all proud of you for having just finished reading 'The Da Vinci Code' (a fabulous book), but don't post all this as though it came out of your head. This is practically verbatim from the expository sections of the book.

  97. Not going to have intended effect by drix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For a government that professes to be so concerned with religion, you'd think they'd have a better grasp of the forbidden fruit phenomenon. Can anyone remember the last time something got banned where the immediate effect wasn't to greatly increase popular interest and desire for said product? RIAA sues Napster, the next day there appears a frontpage story in every newspaper in America about this great new service that lets people download music gratis. End result: 50 million new users for Napster. CD-R tax in Canada and everyone buys a thousand, just in case. Considering I could FTP a really good, 3 SVCD Centropy Telesync over to some friend in Egypt this instant, one wonders precisely how many seconds it will take before this silly "ban" is circumvented and kids are burning copies for the whole neighborhood.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  98. Re:The one thing I didn't understand by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recomend you visit this message board... Matrix Reloaded (spoilers)

  99. Re:Can someone please explain to me..? by senducemhere · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the Oracle has a plan for PeopleSoft...

    --
    Sig? We don't need no stinking sig....
  100. matrix and beyond II by sbulut77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another observation: The second movie is about causality principle. The people, who think that the second movie lacked the philosophical aspect of the first movie, should read/study causality principle and watch the entire movie based on that. You would see what they are trying to explain. They are constantly critisizing whether there is free will or choice (in other words: control) They lay it out pretty well. The people, who thinks that Heisenberg's uncertainity is the proof that the universe is not bound by the rules of determinism, are wrong. Because Heisenberg's principle only states the uncertainity in the measurement. ("Nature and the Greeks and Science and Humanism", Erwin Schrodinger)

  101. What the screens are by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The screens have the images of the previous Ones, repeated. When zooming into the center, you can clearly hear them saying things like "There were four before me" and "There were none before me." They all talk at the same time, so listen carefully, but it's there.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  102. Wrong. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > the church had enough fear of God to look into each case
    > individually. Mass execution of men by formula is an
    > abomination reserved exclusively for the 20th century.

    Just where do you think the phrase: "Kill 'em all, and let god sort it out." came from?

    The original quote was actually in French (oops... freedom) and translates closer to: "Kill them all. God will know his own."

    It was during the Albigensian crusade from 1209-1255 in Catharic France. In summer of 1209, the crusaders attacked the city of Beziers, thought to hold a small enclave of Cathars (about 200 or so). The crusaders eventually sacked the city, taking the populace captive. Lacking any positive way to sort the Cathars out from the loyal Catholics, the soldiers asked the Papal Legate and head of the Cistercian monks, Abbot Arnaud-Amaury, for advice. It was Arnaud-Amaury who gave the infamous order: "Kill them all. God will know his own.".

    And thus, the population of the city of Beziers, numbering 20,000 or so, was put to the sword, so as to execute the 200 heretics thought to be hiding amongst them.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  103. No one will read this, but... by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I realize I am posting this way too late for anyone to actually read it, butâ¦

    I lived in Egypt for four years. The Film Review Board there is notoriously fickle. Some things get through that you cannot believe, others are banned for no apparent reason.

    The original Matrix was a big hit in the Cairo cinemas. I was stunned that they let this deeply subversive film in the country. The plot of the movie is that your life is a lie; a simulacrum that fiendish authority figures (represented by security men in dark suits, no less) are force-feeding you so that you will docilely give them the power they need to survive. But if you know the truth, it is possible to resist, and perhaps even defeat the established authority. The very paranoid Egyptian government allowed thousands of young Egyptians to get this message at their local cinema.

    On the other hand, they cut all the references to âoeZion.â

    --

    -
    Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

  104. Isn't it Ironic... by Ghengis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Matrix movies are about control as much as religion. The Egyption Gov. convieniently uses religion as its excuse, when in reality, they don't want anyone to realize the parallel between the control they exercise by banning the movie and the control the matrix gives the machines.

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  105. Re:Truth versus Belief by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Careful! You're getting really confused. You said it yourself (the mutual exclusivity principle): (1) either truth exists, or (2) truth doesn't exist. It's either one or the other, but not both. And you don't know which one it is, so you're going to assume (2).

    However, in doing that, you've assumed that the answer to the riddle is an absolute truth value that is independent of your judgement -- it presupposes absolute truth -- whether or not you can know it. In that case, the only way to remedy your situation is to assume, or know (1). To assume (2) is to contradict your own reasoning and ignore logic -- supposedly the only truth you believe in.

    Now try replacing "truth" in the mutual exclusivity principle with other nouns: "thought", "a spoon", "my hand". It all boils down to the same thing, whether it's abstract thought or the real world. You may not know if your hand exists, but you know absolute truth does.

    If nothing I say has gotten through to you yet, I don't think I'll be able to help you. I suggest you study up on this a little bit. Take some philosophy classes when you get to college. I'd suggest a philosophical skepticism class. Read some of the works by George Moore, Wittgenstein, and Hilary Putnam. Even the harshest of recognized philosophical skeptics won't doubt that there is absolute truth, though they'll argue that you can't know it (another point I disagree with -- but that's not what we're discussing).

    --
    ...just my 2 gil.
  106. ::shakes head:: by pr0ntab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    REVENGE

    More specifically, Neo, through defeating and inadverting freeing Smith, took away his "purpose". He gives a quick speech about this to Neo before attempting to gang rape him. Smith is trying to return the favor, that is, he is attempting to make Neo irrelevant. Either he will 1) kill him, which was his original purpose he still holds on to, or 2) destroy the Matrix by converting all of its inhabitants into him, leaving Neo no one to free.
    He's taking this frustration that comes with his new freedom and directing it back on his liberator. How pathetic: he so desperately wanted out of the Matrix, and now that he's free he sees no other option but to remain there and make Neo suffer even moreso.

    Poor thing. He's not coping very well without dogma, is he? And I like Smith...
    (well, I like Hugo Weaving, I think he's the best cast member).

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  107. Re:Got all that... by TephX · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think it is. The Architect said that the earliest, perfect versions of the Matrix were a failure. They set everything up the way they thought they should be, and made all the humans happy to boot, but lots of people rejected it.

    [snip long, accurate plot summary]

    Everything you say is correct, but I still don't see how it explains why the "anomaly" would cause "fluctuations" in "even the most simplistic equations". I mean, everything you say just comes down to "the problem is choice", as Neo said. But, while this is a good plot device, it's not intuitively plausible. What kind of special issues does choice raise? Sure, humans are unpredictable, but what exactly are the nature of the "fluctuations" that the humans are able to induce? Is that how Neo and friends are able to make the Matrix conform to their wills? It's not obvious why a system that doesn't allow this to happen would necessarily be unacceptable to humans.

    Understand that I'm not saying that the movie should have explained this, both because it would have had to go into a lot of depth to fully satisfy me (taking away screen time and likely boring the rest of the audience) and because until we see the third movie, we won't really know what to make of all this anyway. And I wouldn't point out things like this in Star Wars or whatever at all. It's only because the Matrix series seems to aspire to "hard" sci-fi status that I think these kinds of criticisms are even relevant.
    --
    I metamoderate all Redundant and Offtopic moderations as Unfair.
  108. Re:Got all that... by TephX · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you're going to analyze a movie, at some level you need to accept the things purported as truth within that movie. I agree, thermodynamically the humans as batteries idea makes no sense. However for whatever reason, batteries, spare brain cycles, whatever, the Machines need Humans in order to maintain their quality of life. However they are willing to accept a lesser quality of life if there is a good enough reason to destroy all the humans.

    Actually, my favorite plot theories (although admittedly also the least likely to be presented as fact in Revolutions) make the whole battery thing not be true, for whatever reason. For example: the machines are actually serving man, just in a really complicated way; or the machines are keeping them around as museum pieces or pets of a sort. (The most common theory that would have the humans-as-batteries thing not be true, of course, are the Zion-is-another-Matrix theories, but while I think Reloaded was deliberately intended to give some fuel to those theories, I also think it's extremely unlikely that they will be presented as fact in Revolutions.)

    That wouldn't serve the audience of the movie very well, and it wouldn't server

    Heh, I make that typo all the time too, although I usually catch it.

    the Architect very well either. The colloquialism he used got his point across just fine.

    Well, I was able to understand what he was saying, but it sounded... imprecise. As Brendan Byrd said elsewhere in this thread, the Architect was generally extremely careful in word choice, which makes a metaphorical usage of "design" sound odd.
    --
    I metamoderate all Redundant and Offtopic moderations as Unfair.
  109. Somebody got it!!! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Interesting


    My guess is that the Oracle has a plan for Neo that is outside the scope of the Matrix's purpose for the One.



    That's right people, IMHO it is all about the ORACLE. All of this other crap is hokey. She is the one that set all of this up. She is the one that sees things for what they are... and after all... SHE IS THE ONE THAT WAS DESIGNED AS THE HUMAN ADVOCATE, the one that was sent to "find a permanent solution to all of this." And one of the things that the movie harps on is effect and purpose. Well, we know what she was designed for. TO BE OUR OVERMOTHER. Well, she is fulfilling her purpose. She loves her kids and wants the best for them... and that ain't the Matrix.

    As she has said before, "We all got to get along, Kiddo. And we all have a purpose." She knows human nature better than we do. She knows what is best, she just has to push her "children" to do what is best and get out of a bad situation. She goads you to do it. She even tells you that she is telling you what you need to hear. She laughs about it. Then offers you something you cannot resist like cookies or candy. To make you happy. She wants all her kids to be happy. Just like every mother. But she is behind it all.

    The second theme of the Matrix movies is that no one can tell you your purpose no matter how many roadblocks they put up, real or not. You have a purpose and it will come out. Mom just shows you the door.

    The Oracle is setting up a system that both machines and humans can get along together in. She is the one that set up Zion long ago much to the chagrin of her "ex-husband" the Architecht. She is the one that goads them along. She is the one that carries on caring for people while the system beats them down. That is her job. And her job is to find a solution. She found it. The "best solution" is not the Matrix. It has something to do with Neo's instant evolution at the end of the movie. That was a way for people to control them in the real world. Neo just made an evolution. OR SAY, "revolutions."

    My guess is that it has something to do with humans and AIs getting on equal ground with each other, creating a new symbiotic relationship instead of parasitic. But then again, that is my idea.

    Just keep in mind that it was the Oracle that is a machine that thinks like a human, and that Neo is a human that thinks like a machine. They are different sides of the same coin. And that is why she uses him to effect change.

    See why she likes him?

    "Now have some candy... ... I juuust love candy. Want some?"

  110. Re:Islamic Terrorism by KjetilK · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think you both misinterpreted my post (which may be my fault, of course).

    I didn't intend to say that there is a direct link between poverty and terrorism. That is not what we're seeing. Most of the poor population is very passive, sometimes that's good, because most of the population don't want a war, they're not going to kill anybody, and sometimes it is bad, as it is very hard to have a popular uprising against dictators.

    What poverty does create, is a general sentiment that someone else is responsible for your misery, a sentiment that can then be exploited. The next problem is that that allthough the vast majority would never resort to terrorism, a very small minority would, and those who think they have the resources to "do something" will "do something". Under the wrong circumstances, this something will be terrorism.

    If malaysians were all big, fat and had no percieved enemies, the prime minister would not be listened to, would he?

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid