Slashdot Mirror


AOL Bridges AIM and ICQ

Checkmate3 writes "Looks like AOL has finally made good on plans to integrate ICQ and AIM... eWeek talks about a new version of ICQ which will allow for users to message across the two networks." I have to agree with the sentiments expressed in the article. I can't remember the last time I used ICQ, or even what my number was.

68 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. ICQ + AIM = by danormsby · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now I can get spam from two places at once!

    --
    Omnis amans amens
  2. Someone's gonna say it... by Alranor · · Score: 5, Informative

    so it might as well be me.


    Use Trillian , it rocks.

    1. Re:Someone's gonna say it... by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not really -- it doesn't support international characters from other IM's correctly, that's said to be due to poor UTF-8 support (which pretty much all other IM's support and use). This bug has been silently ignored by the developers for around a year by now. For example messages received from ICQ Lite has its international characters removed

      This for a commercial software.

      Miranda is both free (as in beer) and open source, and has no problems whatsoever with international characters, while also offering far more plugins than both Trillian and Gaim.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. Integration is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Integration will allow people to choose which service they like better - AIM or ICQ. I don't think they are anywhere near getting rid of ICQ - it has too many users, especially overseas. Integrating with AIM will allow these people to communicate with people who like the less sophisticated AIM communicate with ICQ users. --- Addicted to adult entertainment?

    1. Re:Integration is good by spyfrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with Troed - almost everyone I know uses ICQ. And if they don't use ICQ then they sadly uses MSN. AIM seams to be pretty nonexistant here in Sweden (and perhaps Europe).

  4. nice for european users by zal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    as icq still is the dominant IM around here

    --
    -- never underestimate someone who overestimates himself
  5. Miranda by eddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I like Miranda better. Miranda just gets everything right. Light-weight by default, and plugins for everything else.

    I couldn't even find the source-code for trillan. Is it available? If not, Miranda wins _hands_ down since it's GPLed.

    Too bad it's Windows only though.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Miranda by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      This doesn't really come as a surprise...

      Trillian Pro: Currently 26 plugins
      Miranda: Currently 167 plugins

      Granted, Trillian supports a couple more IM's out of the box, but Miranda do have a large and very active plugin developing community. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Miranda by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Funny
      I couldn't even find the source-code for trillan. Is it available? If not, Miranda wins _hands_ down since it's GPLed.

      That's a rather strange argument. By your logic, this IM program is superior to Trillian:
      /* This program is GPL'd */

      #include <stdio.h>

      void main(int argc, char** argv) {
      printf("Sorry, IM functionality is not implemented yet!\n");
      }
    3. Re:Miranda by edwdig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One great thing Miranda has going for it is it's the only multi-protocol IM client I've seen that supports single message mode. Finally a way to use AIM without windows popping up over what you're doing.

    4. Re:Miranda by digitalsushi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've started porting this to perl- should have something in cvs later tonight. thanks

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  6. Jabber by wazlaf · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have given up on ICQ/AIM a long time ago. I now use Jabber for all IM needs. Seriously, I recommend it to everyone who is currently using ICQ or AIM. There are transports which can connect you to your previous network so that you don't loose connectivity to your friends.

  7. Or you could go open source... by imtheguru · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... and use Gaim, for Linux and Windows. Has capability to connect to AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber, Gadu-Gadu(?) and IRC networks.

    Cheers,

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
    1. Re:Or you could go open source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting question. I think at first when someone starts a project it is a lot of fun. When you have your first regular users, everything is good. Then you start to get people who make ask for features. It usually starts with something like "Oh I can't use your software until it does [feature]" O.K, thats fine, it doesn't do that. Maybe in a future release, you tell them. Your userbase grows and you're still having fun. You're bug fixing a lot more now but thats O.K, people appreicate the bug fixes. But now you begin getting demands from users who think you're there to do what they want "Why doesn't [software] have [feature]? You said you were going to do it months ago!" they cry. You explain that you're busy with something else and don't have time right now. You suggest that maybe someone else could do it and send a patch. That works the first few times but eventually people can't be bothered to send patches for every feature that is demanded, or there arn't enough developers to do them. You get more new users demanding more new features. Not asking politly now, but demanding! "This doesn't have [feature]! I can't believe you havn't done [feature]! Xyz.org have had [feature] for months! You suck!" You stop answering those emails because no one is willing to help out and send a patch. Then the idiots who don't appreciate what you're doing just start flaming you for not having that feature and because "You don't answer email", even though it was their idiotic email in the first place and they could have just searched the mailing list archive or read the FAQ. Eventually enough unappreciative idiots will make enough demands that you finally snap. You flame an idiot on the mailing list and suddenly it isn't fun any more. You feel obliged to carry on now though, as you've put a lot of effort and time into your code and you feel like you owe it to your users. You still get idiots who make demands but you ignore them. It still isn't fun. Eventually you quit and the idiots have won.

      It hasn't happened to me and I don't intend for it to happen to me. The project I work on is large enough and has enough clued users to put the new ones straight, and are very supportive. I can generally stay polite and answer the same questions for the seventh time that week. I don't mind too much because 99% of the users appreciate what the developers are doing and understand if we don't answer mail. I'm lucky though. I know that the above scenario is playing itself out in a lot of projects right now.

    2. Re:Or you could go open source... by supercargo · · Score: 2, Informative
      While I agree with a lot of your comment, I think the easy answer for externally powering an OS project is Miranda's strategy: build a solid framework and make it extensible through plugins.

      Most developers (including myself) just don't have the time to get into the guts a program that needs a new feature, but a sensible plugin architecture allows a journeyman contributor to add a small feature without requiring a patch to the core. The Eclipse project is a great example of this, if Miranda (which I just found from the links on this thread) isn't enough for you.

      --
      -- "He is a being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten mackerel by moonlight, stinks as it shines." -
  8. Great Future, But... by nant · · Score: 2, Informative

    They brought ads to ICQ Lite now as well... Which makes this build of ICQ Lite useless. Back to build #1150 which serves no ads amd is a real Lite version of ICQ.

  9. I still use it.... by kaltekar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...its improved in many areas, which is good. But after AOL took over it has lost much of its appeal. Now I primaly use AIM, only cause thats what many of my friends(Yes, I have friends) use. Now I can run one program and talk to both, wahoo!

    --
    Ahh.. The mind what a wonderful trap!
  10. Openness by mac123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're supposed to feel good about AOL allowing AIM users to message to another AOL proerty (ICQ?)

    Gee..that makes me all warm inside.

    What happenned to AOL's commitment to open their platform to message to other systems? Like MSN/Yahoo/etc.

    As I recall, that commitment was made as a part of the approval for the (now drastically failed) AOLTW merger.

  11. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idea behind ICQ is good (it was the first popular personal IM system, after all (and no, IRC doesn't really count as one)), but the client has sucked ass for years. ICQ has been on the ever decline since it was bought by AOL - and that was a looong time ago. The client kept getting bigger, more bloated and buggier, but the recruitment of new people to the network has just kept dropping (probably because of the client). This move is probably exactly what's needed to save ICQ, and to keep MSN from conquering the market.

    I was on the verge of giving up ICQ myself (but not to move to another network, since my buddies were all on ICQ), when I found Miranda IM. Open source, fast, small, and even interoperable with ICQ, AIM, MSN, Jabber, you name it. I've never even looked at the official client since then...

  12. What's so wrong with ICQ? by Draeven · · Score: 5, Informative

    Personally, I can't stand AIM. I haven't used it in a while, but when I did, It had no automatic logging feature, messages popped up automatically screwing with what I was doing, the Away feature didn't allow you to speak to people and remain in Away mode, the idle detector was an invasion of privacy and personally, I feel the program was bloated.

    Since the ads came, ICQ hasn't been any better.

    The answer? Miranda IM (http://www.miranda-im.org/)

    Comes default with ICQ support, and plugins are available for AIM, Yahoo, Jabber and other such protocols. You can also get plugins to manipulate many of the behaviors of the program. Everything from new message interface windows to ALICE chatbots.

    I don't mean to sound like an advertisement, but I feel Miranda is far superiour to ICQ or AIM's clients, and Trillian for that matter. Trillian != free, thus I cannot afford it. =P

    1. Re:What's so wrong with ICQ? by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I can't stand AIM. I haven't used it in a while, but when I did, It had no automatic logging feature, messages popped up automatically screwing with what I was doing, the Away feature didn't allow you to speak to people and remain in Away mode, the idle detector was an invasion of privacy and personally, I feel the program was bloated.

      Automatic logging aside (Which I hate.... I don't need people I know keeping endless logs of what I say to them. I've had more then one friend come back later complaining to me about something I said and they'll pull out their Trillian logs to prove it. My words to them, "Get a life."
      The ability to put up an away message and keep talking? Wouldn't that basically say that you are, in fact, not away. If you're avoiding someone... why are they on your buddy list (and hence, can see that you are online.)
      You can turn off the idle dectector. For someone who doesn't like invasion of privacy... automatic logging sure seems to be it, for the other person at least. You have to get permission to log telephone calls, why should aim be different?
      As for the ads (which you don't complain about, but others are).... the 2 tiny ads don't bother me. They are unobtrusive, and 8 out of 10 times, the bigger one forgets to be an ad and is just an AOL graphic. But, to everyone his own, I guess. AOL has to support the service some way.

    2. Re:What's so wrong with ICQ? by moitz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Comes default with ICQ support,

      Yes, but how exactly do you disable ICQ? What about those of us who have NEVER used ICQ, and don't see any reason to (no one I know uses it...)? I tried Miranda-IM, and finally ended up making up an ICQ number just to get it to open and connect. The FAQ's were of no help (for all you RTFM folks.) I don't like having to do things like that. Some people actually do like things that just work. Hence why I drive a Honda and not a GM (yeah, yeah, flame away.)

      I don't mean to sound like an advertisement, but I feel Miranda is far superiour to ICQ or AIM's clients, and Trillian for that matter. Trillian != free, thus I cannot afford it. =P

      Strange, I seem to have found a free version of Trillian. It's not exactly like trying to locate the "free" version of RealPlayer or anything. Just go to download.com.com and search for Trillian. It's right there.

      -moitz-

      --
      Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
    3. Re:What's so wrong with ICQ? by hankaholic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can talk to people with AIM while away without killing the away message -- you just have to directly connect to them before setting your away message.

      It's a pain when you've already set an away message, but with a little foresight, it's possible.

      Not picking arguments, just sharing a tip for those using AOL's IM client.

      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
  13. iChat can now contact ICQ users? by trash+eighty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i used to use ICQ but its very crash happy on a Mac but the OSX bundled IM program is AIM compatible isn't it? does that mean i can now use iChat to contact people on ICQ networks?

    1. Re:iChat can now contact ICQ users? by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use Fire for OS X, which works with ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, irc and Jabber. Works OK for me! And it's free!

      Get it from http://fire.sourceforge.net/

      Cheers,
      max

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  14. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nice troll. Well not really, and it got marked up to insightful for some reason. Way to go, moderators. Now if you'll all put down the crack pipe and read the following:

    Hey, guess what? You don't have to install ICQ to talk to ICQ users. You could use one of the many Jabber clients available to you, though I don't prefer them myself. Programs such as Trillian and the free, open-source GAIM allow you to simultaneously connect to various different IM networks with relative ease now, and despite not supporting the entire feature set of these networks in the case of GAIM, is certainly preferable to having a client installed per each network.

    There's also the web pager and web chat room (http://wwp.icq.com/#######, where the # signs are for the number of the user you want to contact). Send them a pager message letting them know you want to talk in their web chat, and away you go.

    There's -also- a Java client on the ICQ page (over here), which you can use from just about anywhere if all you want to do is get through to people on ICQ, but the above alternatives are preferable in most cases.

    There's also..oh, hey. You're probably not even reading this anyway, are you troll? You got your cute little jab in, and you've probably moved off to harass some other group. Sorry to have wasted your time with reasonable discussion.

  15. ICQ- what happened? by Traderdot · · Score: 5, Informative
    Seven or eight years ago, everyone I knew used ICQ. Gradually, people shifted to AIM. I still don't know how that happened but at some point AIM reached critical mass and most people I knew dumped ICQ entirely.

    ICQ had more features (able to msg people offline) and AIM was and is relatively featureless. Maybe that's what people like. Just the basics.

    In any case, I use Trillian to log on to all the different services at once. (Jabber is another option).

    For those of you complaining about ICQ bloat, there's ICQ Lite (link is to the alpha version that can communicate with AIM)

    1. Re:ICQ- what happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all, this seems to be a country-thing. All my friends/contacts are on ICQ. One or two are on the AIM-network too. AIM doesn't seem to have made any great inroads here in Sweden, but then, I can only speak for myself and the people I hang with.

      Secondly, those who don't like bloat should be running Miranda.

      People who love Trillian but hasn't tried Miranda yet should do so, you might find a new love (unless you're partial for bloat and glitz and non-source availability).

  16. popup messages by slitfinger · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only reason I still use ICQ is because it's one of the few clients that lets you keep messages in the tray and have non-conversation mode messaging. I don't know why anybody would want an instant message popping up and taking the focus from whatever you're doing, or even wasting space on the taskbar. Miranda can do it too but it keeps crashing on me.

  17. I'm using ICQ right now. by sonicsft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why am I using ICQ right now? Because it has a lot of really important features that AIM lacks. Offline messaging, more in depth profiles, and screenname formatting flexability. Sure its not great for wimps who can't remember their ICQ numbers. Of course both the ICQ and AIM clients suck so much I've used neither since I discovered Trillian, Fire, gAIM, iChat, and Jabber. Now only if they'd adopt some of the features that WASTE has, like ambiquitous encyption(although I'm being told that the latest AIM has some sort of encryption built in).

    -sonic

  18. ICQ is better anyway by Zanguinar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I use Trillian and/or gAIM, so I have access to both my ICQ and AIM friends. However, I sorely miss the days where ICQ was the standard. To me, it's just a better application.

    First of all, let me remind people that these are instant messaging programs. However, they've turned into chat programs. I don't want to chat with somebody, so don't keep a resident chat window up. I want to send an instant message. One. Then I want to get an instant message. Not a chat. What ever happened to that paradigm?

    Also, ICQ gives you many more status options. True, they're not all necessary. However, you have the option of letting certain people bug you when you have a certain status. So, if you wanted to set yourself as "Occupied", you're pretty much telling people you're around, but don't want to be bothered. Plus, you can allow certain important people to still contact you anyway. And, of course, there's my personal favorite: invisible mode. It's very handy for when you want to jump on to look for a specific person you need to get in touch with, but don't want to be bothered with talking to anybody else.

    Oh, another thing... Screen names. It's nice to be able to pick whatever screen name you want, without it needing to be unique. It's sorta like the real world that way. Chances are slim that you'll personally know somebody with the same screen name as you, so why do they need to be completely unique? Again, ICQ has the UIN to solve this problem.

    I hope I'm not the only one that feels this way. The only argument I've ever heard for not using ICQ instead of AIM is "nobody uses it." That sounds like a bad reason to me. I hope that they add these features to AIM instead of removing them from ICQ. I'd like to see the two become one. Or maybe I'd just like to see all AIM accounts get converted to ICQ accounts...

    1. Re:ICQ is better anyway by lorax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First of all, let me remind people that these are instant messaging programs. However, they've turned into chat programs. I don't want to chat with somebody, so don't keep a resident chat window up. I want to send an instant message. One. Then I want to get an instant message. Not a chat. What ever happened to that paradigm?


      letmesee, you want to be able to send a message, then at some undetermined time later you want to get a reply, and until then, not know if the person actually got it? That paradigm is now called e-mail, please update your paradigm dispatch table.


      And, of course, there's my personal favorite: invisible mode. It's very handy for when you want to jump on to look for a specific person you need to get in touch with, but don't want to be bothered with talking to anybody else.


      What happends if the person you want to talk to is also in invisible mode?

      It seems that what you want is the benefits of IM (instant access to all your friends whenever you want) without the disadvantages (they have instant access to you) It seems a little unfair to me.

      On the other hand, the Occupied status seems useful, 'don't bug me unless it is important'

  19. ICQ isn't that bad by TwistedSquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Leaving aside all the lesser-used/open-source IM clients, of MSN, AIM, Yahoo and ICQ, ICQ is the best one. MSN doesn't offer offline messages, AIM sucks, Yahoo is not too bad but ICQ is the most useable and reliable imho.

    Merging it with AIM will just take it downhill I imagine...

  20. Unfortunate death of a pioneer... by AceMarkE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ICQ was, at least as far as I could tell, the first truly widespread IM client, and certainly the first popular client for Windows (yes, I'm ignoring IRC and Unix's "talk"). I originally got it because it had become a requirement for my Mechwarrior 2/Netmech clan (which would put it somewhere back around 96/97). My number was ~1.1 million, so by that point it had already taken off reasonably well.

    Interestingly enough, I'm pretty sure that early on ICQ had most of the features that AIM has added on in recent years, though I don't happen to have an old copy of it around to compare for sure. Unfortunately, later versions became nothing more than an exercise in "How many new buttons can we add per version?" (see this ICQ history page for an example).

    Ultimately, I think the two major items that have hurt ICQ are the feature bloat and the network effect. AIM's ability to communicate with AOL users offered a huge incentive to those who didn't have AOL, and with if the people you know are on AIM, why bother with ICQ? AIM's relative simplicity didn't hurt either.

    So, while ICQ may not be quite dead yet, it's certainly lost the role of leader and pioneer that it once had. It's a bit of a shame seeing an old favorite go the way of Prodigy and Compuserve, but I guess that's life on the 'Net.

    Mark Erikson

    1. Re:Unfortunate death of a pioneer... by calethix · · Score: 2, Funny

      "My number was ~1.1 million"

      nanner nanner, mine's under 200000. ;)

      I think I started on ICQ around early '96. Why do I feel so old all of a sudden?

  21. Re:Thank God by archen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a horrible program NOW, but it wasn't back when there was ICQ98. A cute small program that rarely crashed. Then came ICQ 99 and it's exponential bloat. It started really going downhill with the 'everything but the kitchen sink' syndrome - with all sorts of alarms and post-it notes and other crap you don't want in an IM client. After that each version got worse and worse. Thanks AOL =P

    Now days I just use Miranda IM on the rare occasion I even use IM anymore. It's actually better than ICQ used to be. Extremely stable, small footprint, and extendable through really cool plugins (including talking to msn messenger clients).

  22. This isn't new by rit · · Score: 5, Informative

    You've been "Bridged" for ages.

    ICQ uses the AOL network.

    Type your ICQ # and Password into ANY AIM Client, for example the sidekick which I know works, and connect.

    AIM loads you in, loads all of your buddies, etc.

    If you use GAIM, there is no AIM plugin or ICQ - there's one called AIM/ICQ.

    Same protocol...happend ages ago =)

  23. old news by Faceprint · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their servers have been able to do this for some time. As a result, Gaim has been able to do this for a long time (a couple releases now, at least).

  24. Gaim by TheKingAnt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would just like to point out that Gaim has supported messaging between ICQ and AIM for a few months now.

    Windows AIM has supported receiving messages from ICQ users since maybe March, but Gaim has been the only ICQ client (I know of) that is able to receive messages from AIM people.

  25. The numbers are part of the problem by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMO, The fact that ICQ uses numbers to identity users is probably part of the reason that people prefer other instant messenger services. Which would you have a better time remebering: 57544362769 or mynickname? When AOL took much of Compuserve's market it was because people loved the way AOL used names for their users and not numbers, as Compuserve did. The first step in making something user friendly is making what they use, easy to remember.

    When it comes to the client I really didn't care much for it, especially the one for MacOS X. When so many friends being spread across services I opted to use multi-messenger clients such as Fire on the Mac and Trillian on the PC.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  26. 174581... by Lordfly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That was my UIN (still is, incidentally, on Trillian). Man, those were the days.

    I remember being able to log in and not be spammed to death by random people (either "ASL?! I WANT TO SEX YUO" or sales for penis pumps). I also loved the interface, where sending messages was more "e-mail" than "instant messaging". It let people come up with more eloquent responses to one another, rather than firing off one liners. NOw everyone gets impatient or thinks you went offline if you take more than 30 seconds to reply to anything.

    Did I mention the program was relatively bloatfree back in those days? You know, before they turned it into a Swiss Army Knife with stupid features no one uses. Activelists? Come on now.

    Ahh, but then everyone I knew switched to MSN (duude, it's soo simpler!), and the days of eloquent messaging were gone, washed away by that fucking butterfly.

    Sigh...

    *puts an away message on Trillian and goes to work*

    --
    hookers and grits.
  27. i like icq by PhiberOptix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but the old one. the ad-free, non bloat without webservers, chat windows, spam, etc.
    but i guess i'll have to go back in time to 1996 to see that again.

    nowadays i see more and more yong ppl using microsoft messenger (yes, that piece of crap). why? comes preinstalled by default on windows xp and it's a pain to get rid of it.

  28. My observation... by saintan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Overworked (voluntarily) + underpaid + no social life + having to deal with insatiable end users = disgrungtled OSS developer

    underworked (intentionally) + overpaid + overtly excessive social life + having to deal with like minded stupid people = disgruntled state/federal workers

    common denominator = PEOPLE!

    get rid of them all! they are a miserable race!

    --
    ****--- A fortune cookie once told me the meaning of life...so I ate it. ---****
  29. You think AOL screwed up ICQ, try WinAMP by PhinMak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have A real problem with what AOL has done to my favorite programs. I used ICQ a few years ago, but lost interest when none of my friends used it. (Have you loked at their user database? There must be a hundred million south east aisans!) But even worse has been WinAMP 3.0.

    Nullsoft was purchased by AOL long before the latest release. Now WinAMP is not the simple, friendly, llama approved MP3 player it used to be. Now it has a web browser, video abilities, etc etc. I don't want another Microsoft Windows Media Player! Bloated is the word. All that coding for stuff I don't want and the stuff i do want doesn't work because they don't have the time to fully test it. Argh!

  30. Oh....to share features. by jlk_71 · · Score: 2

    One thing I have always thought AIM should do is incorporate into itself a system like ICQ has, where you can leave offline messages for friends. I wonder if, with this bridging, that is in the works or not?!?

    Regards,

    jlk

  31. european IM situation by McDutchie · · Score: 2, Insightful
    _Everyone_ I know use ICQ - no one above the age of 15 uses MSN .. and AOL? Uh, no. Not at all. Noone.

    Location: Sweden

    Here in the Netherlands (a.k.a. Holland) AIM is also virtually unknown, and ICQ used to be the thing. Unfortunately everyone seems to have switched straight to M$N, now, and neither ICQ nor AIM seem to be relevant anymore.

    I have an AIM account, but only because I know overseas people who use it.

    (I use gaim to log on to AIM, ICQ, M$N, Yahoo, and two IRC networks at the same time - my contacts tend to be all over the place.)

    /me quits rambling now

  32. ICQ is far from dead by alpharoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know where the "only six million users" statistic came from, but maybe it was related only to the US. ICQ is still huge all over the world (except the US), and although its user base is indeed declining, all the people I know are switching to MSN Messenger (it now comes with Windows, etc).

    Lots of places in Asia and Latin America center almost entirely in ICQ and MSN, and most people don't even know AIM if they don't have any American contacts.

    And it's not much of a loss either. I'm not meaning to troll, but if you don't communicate with an American userbase, it's probably the worst IM client out of all the "major 4". Yahoo allows offline messaging like ICQ; MSN is just as easy to use, comes pre-installed now and has user appeal right out of the box; ICQ is still, by far, the most feature-rich IM client. And a lot of these exclusive features are, in fact, useful. :)

    For me, the integration news is good news. If the ICQ features are made available to AIM contacts as well now (invisible/visible lists, offline messaging), I recommend some AIM users give the integrated ICQ a shot. It's a good reason to ditch the AIM client, not the other way around.

  33. Why did you stop using ICQ? by rosewood · · Score: 4, Informative

    Silly rabbits! ICQ > MSN, AOL, YIM

    Why? Logging and Offline messages! I use trillian as my client so I dont have to have multiple programs but I prefer to chat over ICQ over any of the others.

    The ability to send someone a message if they are online is just great. The fact that AIM and MSN can not do this makes these two services quite frankly SUCK.

    Also, last time I checked, icq was the only im client that logged all chats by default.

    If you have an ICQ spam problem, just block messages from people not on your list. I havent gotten an ICQ spam in quite some time.

  34. 9775929... and I can't stay away! by crashnbur · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I first signed up to ICQ, I had a four- or five-digit number. Then I never used it, because it was early in the game and I didn't have anyone on my list. A couple years later when it made more sense to use it, I had long since forgotten my password... hence, 9775929! And I think I ended up forgetting that password and signing up for an eight-digit UIN before I finally ditched ICQ.

    AIM is so much better for what I want it to do. My only problem with it is that I can't be set "Away" and talk to someone on my list at the same time. That would be so useful for keeping the IMs down...

  35. Question about Miranda and other alternate IM's by umrgregg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My biggest concern is do these programs allow for inter-client (say Miranda to MSN or ICQ to Miranda) transfer of files? Is there a way to use the video conferencing 'tools' (and I use the word tools loosly) of MSN through any of the clients.

    If all you want to do is chat this is all well and good, but I've noticed that if you want to start sharing pictures or video with family between clients and platforms (from mac to win to linux) problms arise.

    --
    NMG
  36. Memories... by Coyote67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recently found my old icq number and ventured to log back in to maybe talk to some of my old friends from back when ICQ was THE messaging client. Well it turns out back then ICQ didn't store your "buddy list" online so its pretty much a waste of time. ICQ imho is a dieing messaging system. The only people I know who use it are software pirates. Not that I'm saying ICQ attracts software pirates. I don't think the liquor industry attracts organized crime either. Infact......oh nevermind.

  37. This kicks ass! by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm actually a fan of ICQ, probally because it's been around the longest, esp the fact that the network offers peer to peer messanging rather then routing it via MSN or Yahoo's servers. The only reasons I don't use it on a daily basis is living in America no one really uses it anymore, they've all moved on to MSN or Yahoo servers. The only people I know personaly who use it on a regular bases are those who corispond to users is places like Hong Kong, Germany, and Belgium.

    But needless to say it's a big deal in places like europe. I've knows a few people in Belgum who's phone offers SMS-> icq service long before we in america started seeing phones with SMS -> other chat services. While this is just an uneducated observation, icq seems to have caught out more quickly. I'd suspect it's do to the sillyness of paying moolah for local calls, such an insentave I suspect it's likely for ICQ's popularity.

    From what I remember SMS-> AIM and ICQ messaging were the first to be seen on mobiles, so I see this intrgragation as being a big deal. No longer would it be the big 4 messanging standards that need respective software support.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  38. Why I LOVE Logging by Uart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I love auto-logging for these reasons:

    1) Ever accidentally close an AIM window before you could read an incoming IM? I hate having to admit to doing that, and then, having to request a repeat of that comment.

    2) Sometimes people say hilarious shit. My AIM logs provide hours of entertainment.

    3) I rarely use AIM logs to quote people's mistakes, and am not paranoid about others quoting mine. I know my friends are logging me -- and I don't say things that I want off the record via IM.

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    1. Re:Why I LOVE Logging by riven1128 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with the original guy on the pop up stuff, it's one of my main reasons for still preferring ICQ over the rest! I use ICQ 2000b, and I've stuck with that one because it's still mostly compatible with the network. I ran software to strip the ads, and I'm all set.

      The great thing about ICQ is it's messaging interface in my opinion, if any of the other messengers offered a similar interface I'd dump ICQ. I like that I can set it to only blink a small little icon next to my clock when I have a message, it doesn't pop up a message from a friend who's telling me I have to check out this pr0n clip he downloaded while the company president is looking over my shoulder as I demo some code or something ;)

      As for the automatic logging, it's optional in ICQ, you can disable archiving if you're paranoid. I love it because I've been an ICQ user for over 4 years, we use it at work and we pass technical info back and forth, I can easilly refer back to it, or if I want to just look back on conversations with old friends from 2 years ago, I can! it's just nice to have the option rather than not have it at all.

      To me the second best messenger is yahoo messenger, you can enable message archiving if you want, you can talk to people while in invisible mode, or "away" mode, you can disable the idle feature, and while the windows DO pop up on you, they seem to be smart enough to not pop up over everything else and steal the words you're typing in an e-mail or something.

      *shudder* .. nothing like accidently sending passwords over AIM because someone wrote you at the exact moment you were typing and pressing enter. AIM is the sorriest excuse for a messenger I've seen :)

  39. Re:Jabber by JMandingo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We moved from AIM to Jabber at work because it can be secured via SSL. Problem is the server goes off the air several times a day. Grrr.

    --
    Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
  40. ICQ imprinted on my brain by enigma971 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I haven't used ICQ since my freshman year of college 5 years ago, but as soon as I saw those 3 letters, my number came right back to me. But I still can't remember my girlfriend's birthday. Kinda creepy.

    1. Re:ICQ imprinted on my brain by debugdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      ahahaha

  41. I got Gaim. by grafikhugh · · Score: 2, Informative

    It has a few problems that I expect will dissapear as it nears 1.0 , but the ability to keep all of your chatts and msgs in a tabbed window is an awsome feature. I also have a spell checker installed to help me with a problem that me and about 95% of slashdot users have. It does all the usual stuff like multi platform communication and everything AOL's aim offers.

    --
    The Surgeon General says sigs are bad for me.
  42. ICQ support SUCKS! by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 2, Informative

    You would think these dorks could change a password and email it to the original account creator.

    I lost 116117 about a year ago with a bogus multi line foriegn character password and I still have yet to get anything but bullsh!t responses from ICQ.

    Need my own Jabber server.....

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  43. Eastern Europeans and ICQ by Jack+Comics · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had an ICQ UIN account in the six digit range, specifically below 500000. I had that number for several years, and registered various e-mail accounts with it. That was my mistake. It turns out that low ICQ UINs have a black market, where Eastern Europeans, especially Russians, tend to "steal" UINs and then sell them off to the highest bidder through various web sites, such as this one. You can use it for a while, a year, maybe two, and then they'll steal it back from you and re-sell it. This happened to me. I once had my primary e-mail account for my ICQ UIN be a @operamail.com address. Eventually, my @operamail.com e-mail address expired, and I switched over to e-mail with my own domain name. I made sure that this was changed with my UIN as well. However, ICQ has this lovely little feature where they'll e-mail your password to any and all e-mail addresses you have *ever* listed with your account. Thus, even though my UIN was set to use an @apparition.org e-mail address, a Russian managed to create an @operamail.com e-mail address that was the same as the one I used before, and used ICQ's password reminder feature to gain access to my account. I found this out because one day ICQ was no longer recognizing my password, and using the same method that the Russian stealer used, I obtained the changed password, and logged on, only to find a half-dozen new contacts and several messages waiting for me, all in Russian. A few days later, I got a message in Russian that roughly translated as, "How dare you steal my UIN from me. Give it back, now!" Riiight... Soon enough, they used the ICQ password retrieval feature again and re-changed the password. This went back and forth for about a week before I gave up and let the Russians win. I e-mailed ICQ support, and received a useless generated reply, telling me how to go about changing my password. Since then, I've realized that ICQ is as secure as a box of Cheerios, and have moved on to different instant messengers.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
  44. Usage of different IMs? by MacGod · · Score: 2, Informative
    I find it interesting that the spread of Instant Messaging usage is so different than what I've personally noticed.

    Maybe it's a Canadian thing, but my experience (and everyone I know seems to be the same has been that the popularity of the messengers goes like this:

    1. ICQ
    2. MSN
    3. All the others. I don't even know a single person who has ever used AIM, Yahoo, Jabber or Gadu-Gadu.

    FWIW, I use Proteus a very well-written Mac client that does ICQ, MSN, Yahoo, Yahoo Japan, AOL IM, AOL IM(Oscar)-whatever that is, Jabber and Gadu-Gadu.

    Yes, it's shareware, and no, it's not GPL'd, but it's still damn good software!

    Does anyone have any sort of stats on regional/national usage of different IMs? Since your IM of choice is largely based on how many of your friends use a given network, it's not totally illogical that it might vary from place to place.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Customizing ICQ by OgreChow · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am tired of hearing everyone complain about how bloated ICQ is, how they get spammed, etc, so I am providing this simple guide on how to customize ICQ so that it is perfect. First make sure you are in advanced mode and then in Preferences:

    1)Contact List
    a. Options - tuen off everything.
    b. Design - only check Sort Contact List by Name
    c. Shortcuts - set Activate ICQ Messages to something convenient, I use control-alt-z
    d. Colors - who cares ;)
    2) Misc - Only check right-click activation
    3) Status Mode - uncheck all
    4) Connections - personal preference/settings
    5) Alerts and Notifications
    a. General - choose only Blink all types, save message history, and play sounds
    b. Sounds - change the uh-oh ASAP.
    6) Shortcut Bar - get rid of everything except Preferences, Security, and View/Change
    7) skip down to Email Prefs - clear everything out in this section
    8) Old friends - no checks
    9) SMS - if you have it
    10) URL Messages - Clear that out
    11) File Transfer - whatever you like :)

    Security and Privacy:

    This section involves a lot of personal preference. But in here you can set it so that you don't get any of those damned Email messages, phone requests, or anything of the sort. Simply go to the Communications tab and check the left column for those things. You can also set it so that items can only come in from users in your contact list.
    Under the Spam Control section check those bottom two checkboxes - that kills half of your spam right there.

    I hope all of that was helpful to SOMEONE. Peace!

  47. I prefer GAIM... by Comster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But none of my friends use anything but AIM so I can really only get use out of the AIM protocol. I would like to at least try out some of the others, but that would mean trying to switch over my friends who are not easily persuaded. Mostly all the people I chat with are friends from school. I just graduated High School, so maybe AIM has been our generation more than any other IM? GAIM suits me best though because of its lack of ads without using an AOL client hack, and the simplistic options such as turning off colors in messages.

  48. Jabber (or, Who cares about 100+ plugins?) by jgarzik · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A bit of a sarcastic subject, but nonetheless, I think the "my client supports N protocols/plugins" is not something to brag about, it's describing a sad state of affairs.

    The world doesn't need more plugins, the world needs fewer protocols. I read the "AOL bridges AIM and ICQ" from the perspective of hoping the AOL was moving towards the use of the Jabber protocol as a common baseline for instant messaging.

    Jabber is a nice superset of existing instant messaging and chat functionality, from the programmer's perspective. It is, IMO, technically superior to ICQ, MSN, IRC, and other chat/IM protocols. The main thing that prevents it from dominating is really acceptance/buy-in from the big IM providers: AOL, MSN, ICQ, ...

    Jeff
  49. ICQ is better because... by acidrain69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you can send a message to an offline user and they will get it when they login. You can't do that with AIM. AIM says it has that buddy bounce feature, but you still have to BE there to send a message when they get back. With ICQ you just send te message, leave your computer on, and even if you aren't there, ICQ will send the message to the recipient when they log in. I know my ICQ number. It's in the early 2 million range, I've been using it for a while. MOST of my friends are on AIM, but a sizeable minority are on ICQ.

    AIM is just like any other stupid tech that won out. It won because people who didn't know better used it (because they have AOL). Except in this case there is no winner because AOL owns and operates them both :) Hopefully they will now take the best of both worlds and make a kickass client once and for all.

    And this time I hope they clean up ICQ. Who the fuck thought up all those features!? Too many menus, too many stupid options. Emails, pagers, groups, retardedness. They should have just made it clean and simple.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  50. Is this typical of americanism on Slashdot? by GauteL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm Norwegian, that is northern Europe. I've never met anyone that says they've used AIM. Just about everyone still uses ICQ or MSN and from what I've heard that is also true of most other European countries.

    Slashdot have lots of readers from other places than the US, and it seems the editors either forget about that or do not care. The rest of the world does not mimic the US in all regards.

    When the editors add comments like "I can't remember the last time I used ICQ, or even what my number was." it is obviously to suggest that nobody uses ICQ. This might be true in the US, but it is probably not true of the rest of the world.

    Europeans obviously still stay here despite of this, but it is quite annoying at times. There are other places in the world than the US.

  51. :Why I HATE Logging by debugdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with your first and second reasons, but I don't think having a permanent "file" of every one on one conversation you have with somebody is a good idea. Especially considering how many people use the AOL network. This is the network most people use to talk to friends/family and even co-workers. And don't forget about all the high school shit--a lot of these same people that would use AOL/AIM are from the click happy bunch that install kaaza or anything else that will get them "free" music aka same people who will share their whole HDD. Next thing you know your girlfriend is downloading conversations you are having with her best friend real time on kaaza. :-(

    3) I rarely use AIM logs to quote people's mistakes, and am not paranoid about others quoting mine. I know my friends are logging me -- and I don't say things that I want off the record via IM.

    Well like I said I don't know about you but I have somewhat personal conversations on AIM. Chat at your own risk!