Slashdot Mirror


Dreamworks, Sinbad & Linux

Ex-MislTech writes "Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas, an animated movie from DreamWorks Animation Technology that hits theaters July 2, is the first Hollywood production created entirely on Linux. More than 250 Hewlett-Packard workstations running Red Hat Linux make up the core of DreamWorks' graphics platform."

233 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Whew! by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1, Funny

    When I saw "Sinbad" I was starting to think about the comic. No wonder it would take so many Linux servers to render the man. (Yes, he's funny - but man, I wouldn't want him sitting in my lap.)

  2. Linux Quality by Dr+Tall · · Score: 1

    Why exactly is Linux being preferred here? Is it the OS or the apps that can run on Linux?

    1. Re:Linux Quality by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about the cost savings - they've used Unix before, but this makes it less expensive to crank up the number of computers involved. Really, this isn't that big a story. It's well-known that Linux is becoming the platform of choice for this specific application...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Linux Quality by Enry · · Score: 4, Informative

      A few years ago I replaced an SGI cluster with a Linux cluster. Due to the reduced cost of hardware and software (they even bought from VA Lin^H^H^HSoftware), they paid less to purchase the Linux cluster than the yearly lease fee of the SGI cluster.

      And the Linux cluster had at least twice (probably 3-4x) the performance.

    3. Re:Linux Quality by malducin · · Score: 1

      Both actually. The machines are running Linux and using Linux based apps. Maya for 3D I believe, and they have a propietary tool for 2D cell painting which was used last year in Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron.

      LinuxJournal had coverage on this:

      GFX: DreamWorks Feature Linux and Animation
      Linux Dreamworks Redux

  3. Hooray by iamsoscrewed · · Score: 1

    As a Micro$oft pimp, I am glad to hear that Linux is finally getting it's dues in the high visibility world. I hope I see the penguin somewhere in the credits.

    1. Re:Hooray by fitten · · Score: 1

      I believe Toy Story had the list of the names of all the computers in the render farm in the credits near the end.

  4. Problems... by jeffy210 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The biggest problems were the women and the water."

    Isn't that the problem that most men have to deal with anyway?

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  5. the women by metallikop · · Score: 5, Funny
    The biggest problems were the women and the water.

    Strange, being a Linux user women are my biggest problem too.

    1. Re:the women by Dr+Tall · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's no better for Windows users *sigh*.

    2. Re:the women by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need a Mac then so you can mac on the women as the mac daddy

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    3. Re:the women by Exitthree · · Score: 1

      Your Mac called. It says you left your sense of humor behind with it. ::rolls eyes::

    4. Re:the women by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

      Yah, all the Apple users get all the luck, don't they?

      --
      Wherever you go, there you are!
  6. Re:Eh... by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Informative
  7. Will it show in the credits? by strredwolf · · Score: 1, Funny

    The biggest question now is if a penguin will be in the credits.

    Oh oh.... BUY YOUR TICKETS ONLINE!

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Will it show in the credits? by svallarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yeah, sure, keep supporting the MPAA. And when linux won't run on DRM-mandated machines, don't come running to me!

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    2. Re:Will it show in the credits? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Now wouldn't that just take the cake.

      1. MPAA members are only using linux to render FX.
      2. MPAA somehow stops linux through DRM legislation.
      3. ??? (Mainly MPAA members thinking wtf did we just do)
      4. MPAA lobbies against DRM required systems.
      5. Ofcourse the profit goes here.

      Just a wacky idea.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    3. Re:Will it show in the credits? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And when linux won't run on DRM-mandated machines, don't come running to me!"

      Under what circumstances have people been running to you?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Will it show in the credits? by malducin · · Score: 1

      I saw a preview this past Thursday. I didn't see the penguin mentioned, but HP sure got a big logo in the credits as the exclusive technology providers for Dreamworks Animation.

  8. Ironic... by metz2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find it highly amusing that the only place I could find clips for this new movie was on WindowsMedia.com!

    "Created using Linux, advertised by Microsoft."

    1. Re:Ironic... by metz2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, there is the Official Sinbad site, and seen as no one else has posted a link to that I thought I should

    2. Re:Ironic... by gid · · Score: 2, Informative

      You obviously didn't look that hard, it's also available in quicktime. Both formats, thanks to nice hackers, are very playable under linux. Although maybe not 100% legally... :(

  9. Re:Eh... by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, most of the workstations of the animators are linux.

    The animation director's is a dual 2ghz xeon running limux. He told me so. He also told me they'd be changing in a few years, but wouldn't tell me what to :(

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  10. If you had doubt.. by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

    Red Hat is here to stay, this stuff is just good press for them.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:If you had doubt.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It's nice publicity for Red Hat, but how many copies did Pixar buy? (Then again, a big ticket customer like Pixar might have bought a hipri support contract.)

      The Amiga used to get good press too. ;^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:If you had doubt.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Agggh! Dreamworks, not Pixar. Fingers on auto-pilot.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  11. Linux Taken Seriously by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And you have to ask yourselves, does anyone need more proof that Linux is as capable as any other operating platform out there?

    Short answer: No.

    Since when has a Linux user honestly given a cr*p what anyone else thinks?

    Rock on boys!

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by Em+Emalb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you have to ask yourselves, does anyone need more proof that Linux is as capable as any other operating platform out there?

      No. I sure don't. In fact, we've been getting beaten over the head with this for a few years now.

      Linux used by company X! It'll be taken seriously now! Wohooo...that was in like 2000.

      Now, for whatever reason, geeks have this frigging complex that their operating system needs to have some sort of global warm fuzzy. This ain't all hollywood people. This isn't Sally Fields gushing about how we like her (we really like her!). Folks, use what you like, influence (if you must) who you can and just move on.

      LET...IT....GO.

      this message brought to you by the sarcastic Em.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And you have to ask yourselves, does anyone need more proof that Linux is as capable as any other operating platform out there?

      About 95% of the world's computer users.

      Since when has a Linux user honestly given a cr*p what anyone else thinks?

      As long as I can remember. I'm not saying it's bad, but linux users are just as fanatical as Mac users. Almost any negative commentary about linux is met with a slew of rebuttals.

      If linux users are really independent of popular opinion, why is it that every high profile article stating that maybe linux isn't all it's cracked up to be generates several hundred comments on slashdot?

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    3. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by mblase · · Score: 1

      And you have to ask yourselves, does anyone need more proof that Linux is as capable as any other operating platform out there?

      Depending on what you want to use it for -- business workstation? Graphics workstation? Graphics rendering? Consumer desktop? Internet server? Data server?

      Argument-wise, using Linux in one particular setting for one particular task is no proof that it's equally suited for every other setting and task.

    4. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      I'd add that tech savvy Windows users are just as fanatical. This doesn't mean Aunt May, but the tech minded Windows users like those that read /.. Reality is that each OS has it's strong points and weak points and some people have very strong opinions on those points. Unfortunately, there are rarely, if any, reasonable discussions between the "factions" here that don't require a fire extinguisher to read.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    5. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Since when has a Linux user honestly given a cr*p what anyone else thinks? "

      If they don't care what everybody thinks, then why does Slashdot post any story that contains the word Linux?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      As pointed out, we all know Linux is a capable OS.

      What it isn't though is a comfortable desktop environment idiots can use without too much hassle. Once linux can do that (instead of hunting down stuff, or even having to use a command line), only then will the masses use the power of their wallets.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    7. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      Well I am no Linux zealot however I use it 99.9% of the time. My user interface is as good as they get unless you can hook me up with and interface that reads my mind. There is nothing confusing about it and I can make it look anyway I want to boot. I don't do CLI very often and when I do it's in a "window" on one of my mutiple "desktops"/workspaces. If I didn't have a very good and usable GUI I wouldn't be using Linux at all.

      Usability wise Linux knocks the crap out of all other OSes I have used. If you can't get it to work it's because you are a fucking retard.

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
    8. Re:Linux Taken Seriously by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Myself, I'd like to use Windows users and their computers for target practice but that really has nothing to do with them using Windows. I just think that way of most people in the world. I really don't care if those people use Windows, MacOS, Linux, or whatever.

      I just forgive most Linux users.. they are one of the groups I usually feel like not killing. Not that some aren't worth killing.. but I take them on an individual basis before deciding.

      There.. isn't that a big difference from being an OS fanatic!? Actually, I'm half serious. People that seem to make some effort to be intelligent I tend to like.. even if they use Windows.. where as I dislike most other people.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  12. and its got Brad Pitt by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I can't really imagine him as the voice in a cartoon.

    Does this mean that he is moving into the kids movie realm now?

    I know that he says that he rejected the following he got from wuss movies that he started in as beefcake type roles (Legends of the Fall and such).

    Perhaps he is now rejecting the following he got from films like Seven and Fight Club.

    Or maybe he just likes Linux.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I can't really imagine him as the voice in a cartoon. Does this mean that he is moving into the kids movie realm now? I know that he says that he rejected the following he got from wuss movies that he started in as beefcake type roles (Legends of the Fall and such). Perhaps he is now rejecting the following he got from films like Seven and Fight Club. Or maybe he just likes Linux.

      Or maybe he just needs some money.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by AssFace · · Score: 1

      yeah, I'll bet he is hurting under the load of his wife's career constantly pulling him down.

      I just hope that they have enough to eat tonight.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    3. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps he is now rejecting the following he got from films like Seven and Fight Club.

      HEY! You do NOT talk about Fight Club!

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    4. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by prozac79 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can't really imagine him as the voice in a cartoon. Does this mean that he is moving into the kids movie realm now?

      Actually, take a look at all the high profile actors that do voice-over work for animated and CG films. A lot of big name actors lend their voices to kids movies, but that doesn't mean they are moving into that realm. It's just another job (and another paycheck).

      Or maybe he just likes Linux

      Anyone want to take me up on a bet that he doesn't know what Linux is? For some reason I don't see actors choosing to work on this movie because they have some heart-felt connection with Linux advocates.

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    5. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Voice talent for cartoons is respectable these days. Look at how much they plugged the voice of Bruce Willis for a dog in that Wild Thornberries one.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It's just another job (and another paycheck).

      And probably a quick one. I imagine they get the voice talent in and out pretty fast, and then match the graphics to the voices.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Voice talent for cartoons is respectable these days. Look at how much they plugged the voice of Bruce Willis for a dog in that Wild Thornberries one.

      They did that because the movie had nothing else to offer. The third movie in the franchise, they desperately needed some hook to draw people back in. It didn't work.

    8. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't say the movie was respectable. Not that I saw it, but you could tell from the advertising.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:and its got Brad Pitt by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      yeah, I'll bet he is hurting under the load of his wife's career constantly pulling him down.

      I just hope that they have enough to eat tonight.

      Paypal donation site, anyone?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  13. Newsbreak: Baked producers find women a "problem" by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The biggest problems were the women...*snip*...Once the ocean was "baked,"...*snip*...But the Sirens still looked like naked plastic women...

    Me thinks the Dreamworks team had a whole lot of wholesome fun while making the movie.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  14. They call those Sirens? by svenjob · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The least technologically advanced "feature" I've ever heard a company boast about.
    "Each Siren has 16 strands of hair"
    Alright... 16 strands of hair? I thought modern computer graphics were up to thousands of strands. Am I missing something here? Maybe 16,000? Anyways, it's good to see Linux in the mianstream like this. Eventhough I use Windows and Mac OSX for work and school, linux still finds a way to get into my life.
    --

    Totally Life!

    ALL replies

    1. Re:They call those Sirens? by Bonker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Each 'strand' is one curving segment of hair that can be manipulated and curved to a great degree. Compare to typical japanese-animated hair, which has only two segements, the front hair that covers the character's face, and the back that appears behind their face. Yeah, I know it sounds like they only have 16 hairs, but it looks quite a bit better than that. Check out this character picture for a clearer idea of what each 'strand' really is:

      http://a1112.g.akamai.net/7/1112/492/2002091437/ww w.wired.com/news/images/full/sinbad_b800_f.jpg

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:They call those Sirens? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      It's done bundles (called strands) for simplicity. It could be modelled as 16,000 strands; but, the movie might take a few extra years to render.

    3. Re:They call those Sirens? by fitten · · Score: 1

      Pronounced "Fizz-tee," the software is so powerful, it individually simulated each of the 3 million hairs that cover one of the lead monsters, and into the bargain, it reduced the process from weeks to hours.

      http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,48052, 00 .html

    4. Re:They call those Sirens? by defishguy · · Score: 1

      Hey.... some guys reading this would LOVE to have 16 strands of hair!

    5. Re:They call those Sirens? by killmenow · · Score: 1
    6. Re:They call those Sirens? by Allen+Varney · · Score: 2, Informative
    7. Re:They call those Sirens? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Well, Ok.... Foot stuffed firmly in mouth with keyboard propped at odd angle to allow typing...

    8. Re:They call those Sirens? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Alright... 16 strands of hair? I thought modern computer graphics were up to thousands of strands. Am I missing something here?

      These characters had to integrate with 2d characters, not photo-real or even Pixar-style characters. Millions of strands of hair would look out of place next to a hand-drawn character.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    9. Re:They call those Sirens? by svenjob · · Score: 1

      Gotcha. I was wrongfully comparing this style (cartoonish animation) to other styles that are just trying to be realistic and act as technology demos (Monsters Inc, Final Fantasy...). Those had MUCH more than 16 strands of hair. But I guess they're trying to do something completely different.

      --

      Totally Life!

      ALL replies

    10. Re:They call those Sirens? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Basically 16 control strands (CS)...these strands control the direction of other strands of hair which look for their position to that CS. The individual CS' interact with each other too, transferring those interactions to the strands they control.

      Anyway, it's bad enough animating a human body convincingly, now add realistic hair to it and you'r happy that you can use just 16 strands instead of doing each hair individually :).

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  15. I'm confused!! by TrollBridge · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So it's OK for the movie industry to use Linux to CREATE movies, but it's not OK for us to use Linux to VIEW movies...

    That makes about as much sense as putting a screen door on a submarine.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:I'm confused!! by fobbman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      YOUR confused? Considering the ongoing hatred of the MPAA, I don't know if I should see this movie or not.

    2. Re:I'm confused!! by TrollBridge · · Score: 1

      MPlayer uses DeCSS for its DVD playback, which technically makes it illegal.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    3. Re:I'm confused!! by listen · · Score: 1

      No, it uses libdvdcss, which is very hard to call illegal. It cracks the css keys for any DVD you put in.

      DeCSS was questionably a derivative work of Xings DVD player as it used the keys.

      Are there any claims against libdvdcss that you know of? It'd be pretty damn hard to make it stick. In the free world, that is.....

    4. Re:I'm confused!! by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Good point. But very wrong place to ask. You should forward your concern to Linus and let him correct the license: from now on it's illegal to use Linux to produce (render, store, transfer) any movies untill there will be (someone will develop and open-source) the tool to view movies.

      --

      Less is more !
    5. Re:I'm confused!! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      The way I see it is like this: we like the output (entertainment), but don't like the business methods (I'm not saying anything new yet, am I :)

      What needs to be done is for us to send a clear message to the industry that we don't like being treated like criminals and we want to use our digital devices however we want.

      Now the solution, the way to have our cake and eat it too, is simple:

      1)wait for a blockbuster to come out...Lord of the Rings 3, for example.
      2)organise, flyer, whatever, then when it comes out.../don't see it!/.
      3)???
      4)have a couple of million people not see it for a week, then see the movie (Profit!!!)

      Hey presto, we send a message and it doesn't cost us anything; all you need is the discipline to not resist temtation :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    6. Re:I'm confused!! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Are there any claims against libdvdcss that you know of? It'd be pretty damn hard to make it stick. In the free world, that is.....

      It would be very easy to make it stick, at least if DeCSS is settled completely. Distributing a utility that can crack the css keys is illegal according to the DMCA.

    7. Re:I'm confused!! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Hey presto, we send a message and it doesn't cost us anything; all you need is the discipline to not resist temtation :)

      What if we have free tickets? :) (I managed to see The Two Towers for free 3 times...)

  16. Re:Eh... by hendridm · · Score: 1

    > I'll really be impressed when a company such as Pixar starts using linux exclusively.

    That would be impressive, especially since Steve Jobs is the chairman and CEO. Perhaps he could convince Darl McBride to do the same.

  17. yarr by huntz0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    More proof that Linux users are a bunch of pirates

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
    1. Re:yarr by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      I thought those were Kazaa users?

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    2. Re:yarr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, will this movie be rated AARRRRGH?

    3. Re:yarr by delcielo · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing:

      Next Up: Ali Baba and His 40 Thieves!

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  18. JUST GREAT by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    "is the first Hollywood production created entirely on Linux. "
    another thing I won't be able to watch with windows..

    oh wait.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Oh boy, they tackled this years ago.. by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    The Road To El Dorrado had to face similar challenges with the water and gold (and it had the music of Elton John *swoon*). Gold also tends to be very hard to animate because of it's luster.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  20. If was ask nicely... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    If we ask nicely, do you think they'll GPL any of that nifty software?

    Please Mr. Spielberg...

    Pretty, pretty, please...

    With sugar on top...

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  21. Re:Another one bites the dust by amishgeek · · Score: 1

    Actually, I thought I was replying to the Mac OS 10.3 story... Somehow I hit reply on that one, and it posted to this one.

  22. Trouble with the pre-screening... by pb · · Score: 4, Funny
    Apparently they're having trouble getting this deployed because the theatres are having a tough time with their new digital video systems; it quits immediately with this error:

    - MPlayer crashed. This shouldn't happen.
    It can be a bug in the MPlayer code _or_ in your drivers _or_ in your gcc
    version. If you think it's MPlayer's fault, please read DOCS/bugreports.html
    and follow the instructions there. We can't and won't help unless you provide
    this information when reporting a possible bug.




    (and, yes, that was a joke, folks...)

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:Trouble with the pre-screening... by confused+one · · Score: 2, Funny
      An even better joke:

      They're having trouble getting it deployed because RIAA and MPAA are objecting to the use of decss on some digital video systems...

  23. Re:Eh... by DChristensen · · Score: 1

    Why, G5's, of course!

    --

    --
    Mac OS X--Unix without the assholes^Whassles.

  24. uhm by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are better ways to do that, man.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  25. How is it different then this: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Its ok to give away sex, but as soon as you charge for it you are a criminal.

    now I have to go put a kickstand on my horse.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:How is it different then this: by Veranix · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, you've never been married.

      Or maybe you have...no paycheck, AND no sex!

    2. Re: How is it different then this: by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      could you explain what the kickstand and horse have to do with sex, and whether they are used with the kind you give away or the kind you charge for?

      I'm not sure if you're humor-impaired, or if I am. ;-)

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    3. Re: How is it different then this: by kenthorvath · · Score: 1

      You missed the parent post about a screen door on a submarine, and he was making the kickstand on the horse analogy. The common link is utilities that don't make any sense on a given device, or more specifically a mode of transportation.

  26. a film on Microsoft tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, Microsoft can easily match that. All they have to do is remake Derek Jarman's 'Blue'.

  27. 16 strands? by pr0ntab · · Score: 2, Informative

    Each hair isn't drawn individually. What they might have termed "strands" is really a clump that gets it's own outline, and has it's own controls.

    If you look at the picture, 16 seems about right for the number of "clumps" of visible hair bundles with outlines. I imagine the CG animation on these is very intricate.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:16 strands? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      not really, 16 strands is hardly anything these days, but if that's all they need to get the job done, then so be it.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
  28. Sigh... mod me down by pVoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Animating Sinbad proved a demanding test of the Linux operating system.

    In other news:

    "Making coffee proved a very difficult task for my Ford Explorer."

    1. Re:Sigh... mod me down by pVoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Fucking fucking losers... alright, I have karma to burn (and enemies to make I guess)...

      Sinbad's numerous ocean scenes created a daunting technological task. If animators had created the film's oceans segment by segment (as in the past), it could have added years to the movie's production time. By using Linux, the DreamWorks effects department was able to create a rolling oceanscape rather than compose the ocean frame by frame.

      What has linux got anything to do with anything here? it's an OS not a rendering suite!!!

      Hype like this just makes you lose credibility man...

    2. Re:Sigh... mod me down by DASHSL0T · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fucking fucking losers... alright, I have karma to burn (and enemies to make I guess)...

      Considering I saw this under Ford Explorers making coffee, I take it yours does not make decaf. :-P

      --
      Freedom Is Universal
      Linux-Universe
    3. Re:Sigh... mod me down by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What has linux got anything to do with anything here? it's an OS not a rendering suite!!!

      Too bad nobody modded you down. Oh well, perhaps there are others who don't know that essentially the whole animation industry has gone to Linux, or is in the process of doing so. That includes writing open source tools specifically to run on, and enhance the usability of Linux as an animation platform. Ever heard of Film Gimp? There are some open source compositing tools as well, I've heard. There's also Sweep, a slick little sound editing program that was apparently supported by the animation company that did most of Lord of the Rings.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    4. Re:Sigh... mod me down by bogie · · Score: 1

      Wow, so hateful because Linux on the desktop got some needed street credit.

      Are your sure your at the right site?

      btw I think they were reffering to how efficient linux turned out to be.

      If I had to cherry pick a single quote from the article it would be this.

      "You hear a lot about Linux not being ready to work on desktops," said HP's Jeff Wood, director of product marketing for personal workstations. "Well, here we have the perfect example of how Linux is more than ready for the desktop -- hundreds of animators successfully used Linux to create a film right from their desktops."

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    5. Re:Sigh... mod me down by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      As was pointed out elsewhere in this story thread, when you are dealing with hundreds of render stations, linux is much, *much* cheaper to deploy.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    6. Re:Sigh... mod me down by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Yeah man, I think I'm on the right site. I never said I was anti linux. I use linux myself...

      But here's my cherry pick for you: "You hear a lot about Linux not being ready to work on desktops,"

      So let's respond to FUD by writing stuff that makes linux people look like defensive 14 year old girls who shy of their own bodies... The text in that article is just plain demeaning... it has the tone of a desperate teenager's cry. Think all you want of me... the truth is there.

      There are two possible outcomes of this: a) it's going to make some people look like idiots - namely the people writing that article, b) it's going to work (make linux look good somehow), but then you will have whored out your own principles and will be at the same level of advertising as microsoft is.

      You pick.

    7. Re:Sigh... mod me down by Zapdos · · Score: 1

      12-volt coffee makers are pretty easy to find.
      http://kitchenandcoffee.com/lp-7027.htm.

    8. Re:Sigh... mod me down by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That wasn't his point. He was responding to this:

      Sinbad's numerous ocean scenes created a daunting technological task. If animators had created the film's oceans segment by segment (as in the past), it could have added years to the movie's production time. By using Linux, the DreamWorks effects department was able to create a rolling oceanscape rather than compose the ocean frame by frame.

      His point was valid. Animators might be moving to linux en masse; that's fine. But to claim that linux itself is able to do things graphically that other OSes can't is just ridiculous. Linux may be cheaper than the alternatives, but let's not pretend that the underlying technology is so much better than say SGI that you can do things graphically on linux that you are unable to do on SGI.

      Or are you really claiming that whatever technique they used to render the oceans couldn't be done on anything other than linux?

    9. Re:Sigh... mod me down by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      Animators might be moving to linux en masse; that's fine. But to claim that linux itself is able to do things graphically that other OSes can't is just ridiculous. Linux may be cheaper than the alternatives, but let's not pretend that the underlying technology is so much better than say SGI that you can do things graphically on linux that you are unable to do on SGI.

      Linux is apparently much faster. As for whether you could or couldn't do this on some other OS platform, it likely hasn't gotten to that point yet, other than in practical terms of price.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    10. Re:Sigh... mod me down by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Under Linux, you can do things that you previously could pretty much only do on SGI. Because it's commodity PC hardware, it's much cheaper, and because it's sufficiently Unix-like, it's very easy to port.

      That it's open source is at best icing on the cake.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    11. Re:Sigh... mod me down by pVoid · · Score: 1
      And please enlighten us as to why a piece of software that is mostly mathematical (read the most complexe things it will ask out of the computer are 64 bit floating point operations - not realtime interrupt handling) would need the underlying OS to be open source?

      Rendering software needs the following:

      a CPU, with floating point operations (emulated if necessary)

      persistent memory management - read: a file system capable of housing, you guessed it, files

      sockets for network communications in case you want to distribute the tasks - you are quite the fools if you think linux miraculously makes any application distributed

      Are you guys seriously thinking that linux is providing something here that the other OSs can't? If you are, it means you are beyond hope.

    12. Re:Sigh... mod me down by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      First of all, I explicitly said that the open-sourceness of an OS is at best icing on the cake. All that Linux provides that most other OSes can't is access to commodity hardware with a Unix-like interface at the right price.

      Secondly, contrary to common belief, real-world rendering software is not mostly mathematical. I used to work for a certain company which writes rendering software used on such films as The Matrix and Fight Club, and I was as surprised as you to learn this.

      A large Pixar-sized frame might have 2Gb of compressed geometry data and 10Gb of compressed texture data in it. The two limiting factors are network bandwidth (moving that much data around a render farm can be a real bottleneck) and memory (while not all 12Gb will be in memory at once, because the rendering software will do a lot of the caching itself, good virtual memory performance is critical).

      And remember, of course, that rendering is only the last step in the pipeline. There's modelling, rigging, animation, simulation, lighting and non-graphical tasks like asset management all to take into account.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  29. The real reason for the length of production by pytheron · · Score: 2, Funny
    Animators studied the movements made in gymnastics, ballet and modern dance and looked at underwater filming to get a feel for the fluid movements these "water women" might make.

    No wonder the film took four years to make !
    Animator: Sorry love, we didn't quite capture that.. once more, but this time come closer.. we need to get an artistic feel

    --
    "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
  30. First time was last year by beef3k · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...that "an entire Hollywood production was created on Linux", at least according to this

    Hey, it's even the same company.

  31. From The Article ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
    But the Sirens still looked like naked plastic women until the effects department incorporated particle systems.

    Prepare Linux Users, our plastic women will be realistic longer than we think!! To think, we've had these particle systems the whole time and never thought about giving them to our plastic women.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  32. GOOD JOB BROADCASTING THAT YOU NEVER DATED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Every month women have a problem with water retention, which means that their men have a problem with water retention.

    If you ever get a date, you'll understand.

  33. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by neildiamond · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These always make me laugh. "How come the IBM Linux commercial is only on Windows Media not some open source codec that only we know about..."

    It is not irony. There are two major reasons for this:
    1. It is marketing. Most people still have windows and will until Linux wins out on the desktop for average users.

    2. Avid or whatever they use for edting outputs in whatever the video format guy knows how to use. Most TV producers are not computer scientists and don't see the irony and/or don't care.

  34. 3d animation tools? by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article didn't mention what specific workstation tools they were using to model or develop the animation. I assume that these are home-grown tools but any chance that they will release that software?

    1. Re:3d animation tools? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Holy sh*t. I was totally unaware that Maya had a linux version. I guess I need to keep my head above the windows sand a little more.

    2. Re:3d animation tools? by paradesign · · Score: 1

      they have an OSX version too.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
  35. Hah, that's not true... by pb · · Score: 1

    If it were, a lot of couples would be in prison right now...

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  36. This could kind of "protect" Linux from lawsuits by motown · · Score: 1

    As Hollywood's dependence on Linux grows, it will at the same time be more difficult for them to attack the Linux community (for instance for introducing DVD functionality in Linux) without being considered hypocrites.

    I can picture the following court case:

    Prosecution (on behalf of the MPAA): Let us consider this "Linux community". As is widely known, many people among this community are hackers and potential terrorists with no regard for intellectual property whatsoever. For example, take the current SCO suit against..."

    Defense (on behalf of some Linux-related project): Objection, Your Honor! The Open Source community is not on trial here!

    Prosecution: I am merely describing the reputation of the Linux community to give an idea what kind of people we're dealing with.

    Defense: But Linux enjoys a lot of appreciation and support among motion picture companies throughout Hollywood, which make extensive use of it themselvers!

    Judge: Prosecution, is this true?

    Prosecution: Well, uh, I don't know... Perhaps... But that's not the point!

    Judge: It isn't? Then why did you bring it up in the first place?

    Prosecution: Well... Um...

    Defense: You honor, I think about now would be a good time to move towards the dismissal of this suit.

    (Okay, so perhaps that last line is a little to optimistic, but you get the idea. ;) )

    --
    "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
  37. it is about time that they made a movie about him by AssFace · · Score: 2, Funny

    That comedian always had the zaniest things to say.

    And his pants!

    The article doesn't mention anything about Linux having any issue with his pants. Big, billowy pants - likely what inspired MC Hammer now that I think of it.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  38. First Hollywood production created on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    David Lynch's Bluescreen Velvet

    1. Re:First Hollywood production created on Windows? by jejones · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah...later on he did Twin Pentiums: FireWire with Me.

  39. So? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Have they created any patches? Have then released them?

    If not, what have they contributed to linux (or GNU, or X or KDE or GNOME or...)? Anyone answering "credibility", please go on to explain how encouraging other studios to use linux farms without contributing back helps linux. Anyone thinking that this helps fund Red Hat, please quote where it says that they bought distros or support, rather than doing it in house.

    Hearing about people using linux doesn't do anything for me. My mother could use it, but all that would accomplish would be to ensure that I spend all of my time doing tech support for her.

    Linux needs contributors, not users.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:So? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Great, so a bunch of people make the OS, but nobody does anything with it. Sounds like a wonderful idea.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:So? by Computer! · · Score: 3, Informative

      What does a multi-million dollar installation in the entertainment industry do to help Linux?

      It means another customer for content production applications on Linux, to help ensure that these applications will continue to be produced

      It means another support contract for Red Hat or whoever is going to be supporting the render farm

      It means another job for a Linux sysadmin

      It means more customers making sure that whatever hardware/software they buy works on Linux

      It means more publicity for your favorite OS

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    3. Re:So? by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Uh. . . to which rodent are you refering? I wasn't aware that Dreamworks was in the mouse or rat business.

    4. Re:So? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      >It means another customer for content production applications on Linux, to help ensure that these applications will continue to be produced

      What commercial application did they buy? Quote it. From the article I read that they did most of the work in house. Say, where would I get my hands on the rendering tools they produced.

      >It means another support contract for Red Hat or whoever is going to be supporting the render farm

      Does it? Quote where it says that. I assume - and assert - that they did it in house. Prove me wrong.

      >It means another job for a Linux sysadmin

      Which benefits Linux - and therefore you and me - how exactly?

      >It means more customers making sure that whatever hardware/software they buy works on Linux

      Granted, good point.

      >It means more publicity for your favorite OS

      Which means more usage of the type above, i.e. usage, with absolutely no evidence of contribution back to linux either directly in terms of code or indirectly in paying money to people to write it.

      Look, it's very simple. If every Microsoft user switched to linux tomorrow, how would that benefit linux? How would it directly contribute to improving it. Concrete examples, not just "Uh, because, mindshare." Hardware and driver support is the only one that I can think of.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:So? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      > Great, so a bunch of people make the OS, but nobody does anything with it. Sounds like a wonderful idea.

      The people contributing to it use it. Look, I don't mind other people using it, but I'm challenging the assumption that it's an actively good thing, that it somehow benefits me.

      How does it benefit me? Hardware and driver support, yes. Anything else? Anything?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:So? by planckscale · · Score: 1
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy

      Priceless

      --
      Namaste
    7. Re:So? by Computer! · · Score: 1

      What commercial application did they buy?

      Beats me. I never said they did. Who's out there buying Apache? Yet, the more web servers that run it, the better chances that consulting shops, Php programmers, and Apache admins will have to get some business. The better chances that module authors will have to make some money.

      I assume - and assert - that they did it in house. Prove me wrong.

      Why? Very few large, professional UNIX installations provide 100% of their own support. I very seriously doubt that they would have been granted the PO to go out and build this render farm on the assertion that they could hire a few nerds to keep their huge render farm up and running all by themselves. If they are not using a support contract of some kind, they are not as bright as I thought. Since most production shops have a support contract, including the one I work for, and most likely the one you work for, and most likely the one the other /. readers work for (assuming it's not Ma & Pa), the burden of proof is on you. Do I have to prove they bought UPSes and are running backups, too? Besides, even if they are doing it in-house, they still have to pay someone, most likely several someones, to admin all of those machines. When those someones get done with work, guess what they do? Go home and hack on OSS software.

      Which benefits Linux - and therefore you and me - how exactly?

      More jobs = more people choosing open source as a viable carreer alternative = more folks learning OSS = more OSS. And, unless you live in a hole and eat air, you and I both depend on jobs in order to have electricity in order to make more OSS.

      Which means more usage of the type above, i.e. usage, with absolutely no evidence of contribution back to linux either directly in terms of code or indirectly in paying money to people to write it.

      The more users, the more legitimacy OSS gains. The more CIOs who are ready to get checks written. Just because no one's buying the software doesn't mean no one's making money off of it. Just because they are not airlifting crates of code to Linus' house doesn't mean that no one's contibuting.

      If every Microsoft user switched to linux tomorrow, how would that benefit linux?

      Where would they go to get their distros? IRC? Doubtful. They'd walk into a store, and buy a shrinkwrapped distro, thereby contributing to the distro makers. They would walk into a CompUSA and demand that there be Linux pre-installed on a selection of computers. Some of them would demand application support in their companies for the new Linux desktops on everyone's desk. Some of them would demand that their favorite office apps be ported to Linux.

      If you really think increasing userbase doesn't help Linux, why did you install it?

      And, furthermore, who cares? It doesn't seem to me that the OSS community is slowing down at all. Maybe instead of trying to figure out how more users helps OSS, we should just realize that it simply does, and get on with our lives.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    8. Re:So? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      >If you really think increasing userbase doesn't help Linux, why did you install it?

      So that I could change getpeer() and hack a netrek client. While I was there, I contributed a little.

      >If you really think increasing userbase doesn't help Linux, why did you install it?

      Quite right. Correlation equals cause. How foolish of me to actually question that. I forgot that this is a religion.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  40. Re:Ain't That The Truth by HughJampton · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately due to random BSA raids, Frodo was found to be contravening the license terms and was subsequently locked up in DARK LORD POUND-ME-IN-THE-ASS DARK TOWER!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, beowulf clusters imagine YOU!
  41. Re:A funny geek joke for you... by Jonsey · · Score: 2, Funny

    DEC 25 perhaps?

    Because everyone knowns that OCT 33 just doesn't make sense.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  42. The best part of the article... by LordDartan · · Score: 1

    "You hear a lot about Linux not being ready to work on desktops," said HP's Jeff Wood, director of product marketing for personal workstations. "Well, here we have the perfect example of how Linux is more than ready for the desktop -- hundreds of animators successfully used Linux to create a film right from their desktops."

    Kind of brings a tear to your eye!

    1. Re:The best part of the article... by Junta · · Score: 1

      Of course, the example doesn't really speak to the 'not for the desktop issue'. This illustrates that linux can work for the professional workstation, not that it is ready for the home desktop, or even the corporate desktop. I would wager the HR people, receptionists, higher level management types, accountants, and others of their kind were using Windows. This is not saying that it is technically incapable of dealing with the task, or that it is too hard.

      The dominating factor here will be the labor market. Non-hardcore computer users are intimidated by the mere word 'linux'. If the job description included the word 'linux' for a secretary position, you can be that the market of people that feel they can fulfill that role is small, and those that feel they can would expect more money as they are a rarer candidate than Windows users. Companies realize that Windows is doing fine in those roles and that any savings in licensing is offset by the higher pay for the run of the mil positions. In higher-tech careers, most of those people have Linux skills anyway, and so the divide isn't so great, and thus the licensing and technology benefits of Linux pay off in the workstation and server realm.

      And though I'd like to believe some distributions are now at least as easy to use as Windows or OSX, I have to admit that I really can't get into the frame of reference of a novice easily anymore, and I don't think many experienced users really can. I realize that because of this, I really can't say if it is easy enough or not. I think a lot of the people defending Linux on the desktop have this same problem and just won't realize it, though I think the same can be said of some experienced users who would assume the common user incapable of understanding certain tasks that are well within the common user's grasp...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  43. Re:A funny geek joke for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get it right... OCT 31 == Dec 25

  44. Re:do we really want linux associated with disney by confused+one · · Score: 1
    Disney didn't publish the film, but...

    Yes. Because if Disney has to work in Linux, then they might learn something...

    I don't care if it's copyrighted. I'll pay for decent music or movies... I just want to be able to legally view it once I've bought it.

  45. Re: Some might be to do with... by op51n · · Score: 1

    Maya now being available for Linux. Now I can't be sure that that is what they are running, but hell, if they're smart and getting great quality...

  46. What software are they using? by Kingpin · · Score: 1


    Anyone know if they use custom software or 3rd party stuff?

    --
    Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
    Geocrawler error message.
    1. Re:What software are they using? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if they use custom software or 3rd party stuff?

      Yes, they do.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  47. Re:Another Movie...with Linux by confused+one · · Score: 1

    maybe not "news" but it's good publicity -- always a good thing...

  48. Glad to see they're still at it. by Joel+Bruick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if Dreamworks will ever come up with some original concepts for their animated films.

    A Bug's Life/Antz (Obvious.)
    The Emperor's New Groove/Road to El Dorado (These were much closer originally, but changed quite drastically after rewrites on both sides).
    Monster's Inc./Shrek (This is quite a stretch, but hey, green monsters star in both, heh.)
    Treasure Planet/Sinbad (Hardy har har!)
    Finding Nemo/Sharkslayer (Something smells fishy here.)

    Obviously these movies aren't all complete ripoffs by any stretch of the imagination, but it is quite interesting that Dreamworks/PDI movies that closely follow the release of Disney/Pixar ones have similiar basic ideas behind them.

    1. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by jbrasch · · Score: 1

      Exactly my feeling.

      I saw a pre-release last week (w/the kids). It was a good story but the animation quality was just ok.

      I would not point to this movie as to what can be done with linux.

    2. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by sabshire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hadn't noticed that, but a very interesting take on it, nonetheless. Add to that fact, most Disney movies are ripoffs of some other story themselves. So we have a ripoff artist being ripped off. How "ironic"! :)

      --
      You will never "find" time for anything. You must "make" it.
    3. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by JahToasted · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hmmm...

      Armeggedon/Deep Impact Dante's Peak/Volcano etc. etc. etc.

      Could it be that hollywood is just unoriginal... Nooo... that can't be it.

    4. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Dreamworks will ever come up with some original concepts for their animated films.

      Well, I personally thought all of the Dreamworks films listed (With the exception of Monsters Inc. and Shrek since the two concepts had nothing in common) were way better than any of the films Disney released.

      Or is it just me?

      --
      this is my sig
    5. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by cgb8176 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      it is quite interesting that Dreamworks/PDI movies that closely follow the release of Disney/Pixar ones have similiar basic ideas behind them.

      That might be interesting, if it were true.

      From IMDB.com [imdb.com]:

      The release date for "Antz" was 9-19-1998, two months before "A Bug's Life" on 11-14-1998.

      "Road to El Dorado" release on 3-31-2000, while "The Emporer's New Groove" released on 12-10-2000 (and the only thing they had in common is that they took place on the same continent)

      "Shrek" released on 4-22-2001, six months earlier than "Monsters, Inc" on 10-28-2001.

      The only two Dreamworks movies on your list that actually follow Disney movies are "Sinbad" (following "Treasure Planet") and "Sharkslayer" (following "Nemo"). Seeing as "Treasure Planet" (not a Pixar film, nor was "Emperor's") was a huge failure, as will "Sinbad" be, this Dreamworks copycat theory lacks motive. "Sinbad" is based on the story of Sinbad the Pirate, while "Treasure Planet" is a modernization of "Treasure Island". "Sharkslayer" and "Nemo" both take place under water. I guess you win there.
      forgot to log in before

    6. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by One+Louder · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This all stems from Jeffrey Katzenberg's ongoing fury with Michael Eisner over not getting promoted.

      Effectively, Dreamworks tries to figure out what Disney and/or Pixar is up to and attempts to beat them to the theater with a movie with a vaguely similar theme.

      If you watch the "special features" on some of the DVD (Spirit, for instance), you can practically see the venom dripping from Katzenberg's chin as he tries to position Dreamworks as the leader in CGI vs the carefully unnamed Pixar.

      The problem is that Dreamworks does not have a great storyteller like John Lasseter or Andrew Stanton, and Pixar's CG capabilities for the Toy Story/Bug's Life/Monsters Inc class of animation are unrivaled.

    7. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      A Bug's Life sucked.. Antz was pretty funny.
      Emperor's New Grove and Road to El Dorado both sucked.
      Monster's Inc and Shrek were both pretty funny but Shrek was far far better.
      Treasure Planet was a lame rip of the game Skies of Arcadia and the book Treasure Island. I haven't seen Sinbad yet so I have no opinion.
      Haven't watched Finding Nemo but it looks lame.. haven't heard of Sharkslayer.

      Pixar has made some pretty good movies. Toy Story (especially the second one) was very good. Disney hasn't made an animated movie I've liked in several years.. at least I can't think of one. Dreamworks IMO is pretty good. I really liked Antz and Shrek is one of my favorite movies ever made. Dreamworks overall seems to make pretty good movies I think. Don't all movies come in spurts of semi-original (for the time anyway) movies that start a fad of similar movies? We get a burst of teen angst, then sci fi, then comic, then horror, etc.. whatever is selling at the time period. Dreamworks might make mostly copycat films but they do a good job at it.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    8. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Shrek sure seemed to have open mouth fangs aimed at Disney but it was still, and maybe because of that, a great movie. It was both a fantasy story and a parody of a Disney-style fantasy story and it worked well as both.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    9. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by Boing · · Score: 1
      I agree with you. Hmmm, let's see. The most successful of all of the Dreamworks movies you listed was Shrek. Also, the most original of the Dreamworks movies was Shrek...

      2 + 2 = Forget the tired old rehashed storylines that Disney uses, Dreamworks! Make your own movies, we like them... really!

    10. Re:Glad to see they're still at it. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Could it be that the audience Hollywood is catering for doesn't want original stuff.

  49. So? by kperrier · · Score: 1

    If its created on Linux I am supposed to go and see it? No way, Death to the Great Rodent Empire!

    Kent

  50. The future of animation is Linux . . . by shamitbagchi · · Score: 1

    This is the beginning of high end graphics works on Linux and just watch out for the future. More than 250 Hewlett-Packard workstations running Red Hat Linux made up the core of DreamWorks' graphics platform. Shows how powerful individual systems can be used collectively to provide great performance options - graphics intensive computing. Linux provides a cost-effective way to put the fastest available computers in the hands of animators for thenm to proceed withease on rock-solid stable computing bedrock !

  51. YHBT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Neeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrds!
    The funny part about that "joke" is the number of literal-minded anal-retentive geeks that feel the need to "correct" it, totally missing the meta-joke.

    hint: The joke isn't about math, it's about geek personality disorders. It's like going to an obsessive compulsive's house and putting one of his pictures off kilter.

  52. Sorry, not the first, maybe the second? by Baavgai · · Score: 1

    While it's nice that OOS is getting applied in such a high profile venue, I'm afraid "the first Hollywood production" is overstating the matter.

    It's been done; I recalled it being pretty big news for Linux enthusiasts at the time:

    http://newsforge.com/newsforge/02/04/24/1643238. sh tml

    1. Re:Sorry, not the first, maybe the second? by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1

      Well... the article says that this is the first time Linux was used both in the front and back-ends for the animation on "Spirit"... it doesn't say that only Linux was used... that's what the big deal is with this new film.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
  53. Re:SICK OF LINUX by haoto · · Score: 1

    Well I guess this post will be modded out of existence, but I have to say I agree with the parent post. As a GNU/Linux user I hate to see this kind of trivial things posted again and again. Imagine seeing someone writing "Windows is used to create text documents!"

    C'mon, this article sucks. Admit it.

  54. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by Surak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most TV producers are not computer scientists and don't see the irony and/or don't care.

    Can you imagine how awful TV would be if it WERE produced by computer scientists?

    Channel 45: The Slashdot channel! Geeks rant and rave about Microsoft, SCO, and RIAA! Then they geek out over Linux, *BSD (which they always seem to point is dying), and Mac OS X!!!

    Channel 52: The Microsoft Channel! Bill Gates discusses his plans for world domination!

    Channel 54: The Linux channel! Kernel hacker Alan Cox takes you line-by-line through the Linux source code!

    Channel 58: The Apple Channel! Steve Jobs demonsrates his famous "Reality Distortion Field" and exaggerates a lot about Apple's latest G5 computers!

    Channel 62: The FSF Channel! RMS talks about how Channel 54 should be called the GNU/Linux channel!

    Channel 69: The SCO Channel! *** programming unavailable ***

  55. Distributed Effort by neilmoore67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It surprises me that no animator (that I know of) has started some kind of distributed rendering effort with people on the Internet (eg. distributed.net). Not only could it be faster and cheaper, but you immediately have a huge number of people who feel that they have a stake in the movie, this might also increase audiences.

    --
    You've probably noticed that people's noses get bigger as they get older. That's because old people are huge liars.
  56. What ever happened to Spirit? by YodaToad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In this slashdot article it claims that Spirit was the first movie to be created in a 100% linux environment (in April 2002). How can this Sinbad movie be the first one if Spirit was... Over a year ago. Am I missing something here or is this just another PR attempt?

  57. Re: Evil sea hag SCO by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

    SCO probably thinks it should have a piece of the Sinbad booty since it was created on Linux.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  58. Nah, it's OK....... by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    Go right ahead and view the Windows Media file on Linux. You have their permission, I'm sure.


    That makes about as much sense as putting a screen door on a submarine.

    Just so long as it's your submarine they're putting the screen door on.

  59. Not looking very hard... by blamanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if you didn't see it on the Apple Quicktime trailerssite. They're often the first place the trailer shows up.

  60. Doesn't it bother anyone... by blamanj · · Score: 1

    ...that the movie looks really lame. I mean really, it's derivative second-tier Disney. (Judging from the trailer, anyway.) The dialog is dreary, the character styling seem ripped off from Aladdin, and we have the requisite "big names" as voice "stars" to lure in the masses. So it's 3D instead of 2D. Big whoop.

  61. The Illuminati are plotting... by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

    Quite the movie. Not only was it done entirely on Linux, it stars (err...horridly villainizes) Eris.

  62. Who cares? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Honestly, who gives a damn what OS the render farm was running? What we should care about is "is this movie any good", and frankly, it doesn't look like it will be any good at all.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  63. Re:This could kind of "protect" Linux from lawsuit by motown · · Score: 1

    Neither is having the balls to post under your own username. :P

    --
    "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
  64. I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in one of Europe's largest post production houses, and we've moved most things over to Linux now. However, we still need Windows to run Adobe Photoshop, as there's still nothing suitable yet in Linux. The GIMP just doesn't cut it, and I'm sure it's the same with them.

    Sure, the modelling, animation and rendering were probably all done on Linux, but it's probably not correct to say that it was done exclusively on Linux. I bet there were a bunch of Windows or Macs with Photoshop on them being used there, and unless they did all their compositing on Shake, they'll have probably used some dedicated compositing systems.

    Linux works quite well in visual effects, largely because all those who grew up using IRIX workstations find it quite familiar. The pipelining and scripting stuff is easier than it is in NT/2000/XP. However, it's worth noting that the vast majority of the actual graphics software we use is still commercial/proprietary - there's not much in the way of Open Source stuff out there of a sufficiently high quality. The notable exception to this is 'Liquid' a maya->Renderman convertor, and to a lesser extent FilmGimp - useful because there's not much else that will edit High Dynamic Range images, but less useful because it still appears to be rather unstable...

    1. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by spitzak · · Score: 1
      Clue: Linux is running commercial applications! So "the vast majority of the actual graphics software we use is still commercial/proprietary" does not mean you are not using Linux!

      The "dedicated compositing system" is by far the most likely thing to be running on Linux. Every commercial compositing system that is worth using has a Linux version.

      For every single person who says "Linux will never work because there is no good open-source house-blueprint software (or whatever)" is missing the entire point. Nobody expects good open-source house-blueprint software (it's not interesting enough to work on). If things were reversed and Linux was the most popular system, there would be a closed-source house-blueprint software for it, and every game and everything you see for Windows. And if Microsoft tried to compete would people then say "Windows will never work because the employees at Microsoft have not been able to write house-blueprint software"? Hopefully not, but it seems like they would.

    2. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm not talking about the toon shading, I'm talking about all the other 2D textures that you need, even if you are doing a toon-look animation. There will still be loads of 2D textures that you need for backgrounds, particle systems etc... and even the 3D toon characters themselves may have some texturing. All of these need a decent 2D program, and I'm afraid the gimp just isn't up to it.

    3. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about Gimp, but I've heard (haven't tried it myself) that Photoshop 6 and 7 run just fine under win4lin.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very true. My friend does animations / special effects with Maya in Florida and South Carolina area. He would have an all Linux shop if not for Photoshop. He got into an argument at the last siggraph with a booth guy. Went more or less like this.

      Friend: When are you going to have photoshop on Linux? It's the only program I use that I need Windows for.

      Adobe: (Annoyed) Never. Linux people just want everything for free.

      Friend: You sound pretty upset, people must ask you that a lot

      Adobe: All the time! All day.

      Friend: Maybe you should think about that.

      As far as wanting things for free I'm not sure how much, but he paid several thousand for Maya on Linux over the years.

    5. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Tell your friend to counter with the Shake, SoftImage, Maya - not free, but on Linux...guess only serious software works on Linux.

    6. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by charlie763 · · Score: 1

      How about Film Gimp? It was used in several films to edit stills. HA!

      --
      Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    7. Re:I bet any 2D textures weren't done on Linux... by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Film Gimp is a step in the right direction, but when we last evaluated it, it was very unstable. It is still useful if you need to do HDR work, though.

  65. What about Linux OpenGL support? by forgoil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or more exactly, the support for good GFX cards. Does HP provide special drivers etc for certain applications or what?

    Just thinking of the benefit for the avarage Linux user.

    1. Re:What about Linux OpenGL support? by Zapdos · · Score: 1

      I would not be suprised to find out that DW has a NDA with a graphics card manufacturer. But do not expect DW to provide you with a driver, as that may be part of the agreement. They may be the ones makeing the binary-only nvidia drivers.

  66. Not created on Linux! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was created using various applications. Those applications could have been running on FreeBSD, OS X...it doesn't really matter all that much. In fact all of these applications can already be recompiled to run on OS X or whatever. That the name of the kernel providing virtual memory, process switching, device drivers, and some low-level services is "Linux" in this case, well, that's something that really only matters if you're a hardcore geek.

    I don't mean this as a flame at all. It's just that this story is misguided advocacy. Generic putdowns of "Windows" are equally as meaningless. People don't use an operating system. People use applications. Being fixated on operating systems is like being fixated on tires instead of cars.

    1. Re:Not created on Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well... try to run a production render farm on windows. I have seen that experiment run once and at a large scale it wasn't pretty. UNIX/linux in particular is far more suited for distributed work. By the way, DreamWorks has its own renderer also developed for Linux/Unix.

    2. Re:Not created on Linux! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      Well... try to run a production render farm on windows. I have seen that experiment run once and at a large scale it wasn't pretty. UNIX/linux in particular is far more suited for distributed work. By the way, DreamWorks has its own renderer also developed for Linux/Unix.

      So you could run a render farm on any UNIX variant (of which Linux is simply one of many), and do the actual content creation on the system of your choice.

    3. Re:Not created on Linux! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Most of the "not ready for desktop" FUD against Linux is the supposed lack of applications. This example makes it clear that the apps are very much there, albeit it doesn't apply to general desktop usage.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  67. It's funny because it's true... by Dthoma · · Score: 1

    but on the other hand it's not funny because it's true; it's worrying. A media player should not segfault just because of a choppy MP3! In fact, no program should segfault just by reading in a slightly screwed up file, full stop. I'm not joking here, mplayer can be damn unstable at times - I have an MP3 of the song "I Ran" which mplayer core dumps on. Kind of funny, in it's own worrying way. Fortunately, since DreamWorks are creating video and not playing it back, they won't have to witness this kind of error.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

    1. Re:It's funny because it's true... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      I'll go along with that! Is there a version of MPlayer that is actually stable? The ones I've tried (including the 0.90 release) are way too unstable...

  68. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

    LMS - The Linux Music Station! Listen to a stirring reading of the kernel source code! Great bedtime listening :-)

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  69. Dreamworks and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) Spirit wasn't done on Linux. That was marketing bull puckey. It wasn't rendered on Linux, either. There were some portions of the 2D animation that were done in linux, namely the Toon Shooter program and coloring the 2D animation.

    2) Backgrounds and some other minor stuff for Sinbad was done in Photoshop, on Macintosh G4. So this movie isn't 100% linux, either. Although now DW is using Photoshop 7 in Crossover on Linux, and (gasp) Windows 2000.

    3) 3D modeling and animation were done in A|W's Maya. Dreamworks contributed to both Maya and RH Linux by beta testing and reporting bugs, and making feature requests to both, that were rolled back into the public releases. Also they contributed to Crossover with Disney/Pixar to get Photoshop working on Linux. So they have contributed, a little.

    4) A friend of mine at DW got me a pass to see Sinbad last saturday morning. It's pretty good, actually, certainly not as bad as the previews make it out to be - but DW's marketing department pretty much sucks hiney, so I doubt that anyone will ever know that. The animation's not that great, though.

    1. Re:Dreamworks and Linux by axxackall · · Score: 1
      Although now DW is using Photoshop 7 in Crossover on Linux

      I think the cost of problems associated to such running would be more than the cost of contributing to GIMP to polish it for own tasks. Rather than this way of contributing:

      Also they contributed to Crossover with Disney/Pixar to get Photoshop working on Linux

      --

      Less is more !
  70. I think you misunderstood what I said by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    I was pointing out that most of the applications we user are not free or open source, but rather are commercial, closed-source Linux applications.

    The big thing we are missing is Photoshop for Linux.

    As for the compositing systems:

    Flame and Inferno run on SGI IRIX machine with custom harware.
    The Avid systems run on Windows.
    The Quantel Henrys ran their own Quantel system - I'm not sure what the modern Quantel systems run on
    Certainly the only compositing system I know of that runs on Linux is Shake. Most of the others have custom hardware and don't run on Linux.

    1. Re:I think you misunderstood what I said by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Ice, Rayz, and Nuke all run on Linux.

    2. Re:I think you misunderstood what I said by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      What if you use the Windows version of Photoshop under Wine on Linux? Would that count?

  71. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by Kazir · · Score: 1

    > Can you imagine how awful TV would be if it WERE produced by computer scientists?

    Considering what is out there right now on TV, it just might be an improvement. *grin*

  72. Uhh... no. by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
    Um, I'm one of those "lamer" animators who happens to use 2D tools. Obviously you didn't read the article carefully enough:

    Many of the characters in Sinbad were first drawn by hand and then integrated into the 3-D computer-created background scenes.

    The fact is that most animated TV shows (and a good amount of animated feature films) are still hand drawn. Additionally, many computer generated TV shows use 2D tools like (and recycle elements created in) Photoshop, Painter, Flash, and After Effects. 3D is another tool, sure, but it hasn't completely replaced 2D animation. The death of 2D is greatly exaggerated.

  73. Linux can draw? by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The first movie created entirely with Linux"

    So funny how everyone praises the technology. I'm sure they used at least one or two pencils to make that movie...

    Sinbad was traditionally animated, which means a lot of people hunched over light tables, exactly the same way they did it in the 1920-30's. The ink and paint department may be gone, and the effects are a little bit better, but an animator from that time would still fit right in...

    1. Re:Linux can draw? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Not so sure about this. Yes, the movie might look "2D" but that doesn't mean that someone actually drew the character like in the good old days, then coloured them and shot the image.

      There are utilities available these days that allow you to do all that on a computer, so instead of having a pen and paper you have a graphics tablet and software.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:Linux can draw? by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      instead of having a pen and paper you have a graphics tablet and software.

      I work in animation. No artist in their right mind would swap their 4B Lumograph pencil for a Wacom. Not gonna happen. The 50 cent pencil still has the better interface. Believe me, if it was drawn, they used pencils, china markers, colerase, etc...

      Can't beat the classics.

    3. Re:Linux can draw? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Interresting,

      what I have heard and seen from others "in the trade" indicated that after the first conceptual drawings people move over into the computer as it speeds up the process.

      Maybe only some smaller shops do this?

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  74. Dont like the GIMP or CinePaint? by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    You have criticisms of the GIMP, fair enough.

    Could you please (politely) say what they are?
    Are there fundamental features that you are missing or is that the GIMP is just less friendly and usable in general?

    Perhaps if you can give good feedback I could file some bug reports and suggestions, and in general I am interested to know what other people dont like about the GIMP.

    I use the GIMP, I know it could be better but I am not so sure about what stuff exactly should be improved.

    1. Re:Dont like the GIMP or CinePaint? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      I actually use the GIMP more often than photoshop, mainly because I do nearly all my graphics work on linux (Blender). There are some features that Photoshop has that the GIMP doesn't, but I'm hardly an expert. You'd have to ask someone who uses it more seriously. As noted I work with Blender, so the interface is hardly an issue :-)

      However there have been many posts on Slashdot over the last year at least which do outline why a lot of texture designers don't use GIMP. Might want to start here, or for that matter ask the parent post to my post :-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:Dont like the GIMP or CinePaint? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      File preview when opening images would be nice (just thought of that :-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:Dont like the GIMP or CinePaint? by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

      > File preview when opening images would be nice

      both 1.2 and 1.3 have slightly different versions of a Preview in the open dialog.
      in 1.2 you select an image and there is a little button, the text on the button says "Generate Preview" which it does when you press it.

    4. Re:Dont like the GIMP or CinePaint? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Ah! I haven't updated in quite a while, guess it's time :-)

      Thanks

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Dont like the GIMP or CinePaint? by HopeOS · · Score: 1

      I use gimp often, and feel that I can comment on many of the things that are missing or broken. Here's two.

      1. 16 bit color is critical for professional work. film gimp has it, regular gimp does not. After running a sequence of filters, you frequently wind up with 7 or fewer bits of precision, and it shows. For webpage graphics, 8 bits is fine since it's usually palletized anyway.

      2. I find the path tool on gimp to be a miserable experience. Most of my cursing results from lack of undo support, inability to have multiple paths displayed simultaneously, gross difficulty in editing, adding, or removing points, splicing paths, joining paths, opening and closing paths, etc... It's just not fully functional. Adobe Photoshop and Corel's Photopaint both implement reasonable bezier path tools.

      Gimp is very powerful, and I get a lot out of it. But it has the appeal of a lawnmower with a four-cylinder engine and no handle.

      -Hope

  75. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sadly, I think I would actually watch Channel 54.

    --
    Why not fork?
  76. Entirely? by Wonko42 · · Score: 1

    So you're telling me they edited a major motion picture entirely on Linux? Right.

  77. Re:hmmm. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    How can a first post be redundant? All redundant moderations will be meta-moderated as unfair. Here's something on topic. This article proves that Bill Gates' claim that Linux is not competition is wishful thinking. Linux is taking over important tasks, and the creative arts. You couldn't do a stick figure cartoon on Windows without it crashing.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  78. So what? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really, what diffrence does it make what kernel ran their graphics software? I mean, this is a good victory for OSS, but it dosn't really help anyone of us.

    And notice that the article dosn't mention what software the actual animators used. Sure, I suppose they could have drawn each character on cells and scanned them, but I find that doubtfull.

    No, it'll be big news when a movie is produced entirely with Open Source (or at least cheap) software like the movie gimp and other tools.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  79. Linux on the Desktop by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    "Well, here we have the perfect example of how Linux is more than ready for the desktop -- hundreds of animators successfully used Linux to create a film right from their desktops."

    Just because a bunch of computer-savvy animators sat down in front of a computer and made a movie that does not mean Linux is ready for the desktop. Back at Disney we had non-techie-types in their fifties working on their Sun workstations in 1990 and nobody is going to argue that SunOS was ready for the desktop 13 years ago. Things were made so that their interaction with the OS outside of the particular app they were using was very minimal. BIG difference between that and "ready for the desktop".

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  80. Now why doesn't Adobe port by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    Photoshop to Linux, with such a market using Linux I don't see why not. They apparently don't like Macs anymore. Does that mean though that they used GIMP for textures?

  81. distribution must be trusted! by twitter · · Score: 1
    MPlayer at the screening, what a joke. DRM is like "gun control", where the state tell you only the state can have guns. You don't think a movie maker would ever distribute a moving on anything but some horrid DRM system, do you? The real error message would look something like this:

    Explorer.exe has cause an exception fault in module WMP at 0x0...[binary crap] A representative of the MPAA will be notified of your illegal movie watching.

    Free software might be very useful to movie makers, but that won't keep them from pushing DRM on everyone.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  82. Cant wait for Star Wars made with Linux. by Bilange · · Score: 1

    They could say "Use the source, Luke!"

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
  83. Think of it like gun control. by twitter · · Score: 1
    So it's OK for the movie industry to use Linux to CREATE movies, but it's not OK for us to use Linux to VIEW movies...That makes about as much sense as putting a screen door on a submarine.

    You should think of it like gun control. The state imposes gun control so that only the state has guns. Movie makers have a double incentive to steal and supress free software that might be useful for making movies.

    The first reason is, as you noticed, they are afraid people will convert their movies into formats than can be shared. That can be done on windoze too, but windoze will soon have enough locks on it that watching a movie will be difficult.

    The second reason is more fundamental, movie makers don't want competition in movie making. Lord knows there's a wasted surpluss of actors, screenwriters, producers and promoters starving around any big movie making town that would like to work at a new movie house. Both reasons are really the same thing, in order to avoid competition that technology is making cheaper and easier, they have to own every aspect of movie making from poduction to retail distribution. If any piece of the chain becomes open to competition, the rest open up.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  84. CHEER FOR ERIS! Patron of Computers! by farrellj · · Score: 1

    Eris Owns your Linux Distro...drop to a command prompt, and type "ddate" for proof! Works with everything from Tom's RootBoot disk to big distros like Red Hat!

    Hail Eris!

    All Hail Discordia!

    Goto www.fnord.org for more info, or consult your Pineal gland.

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  85. I'm not bothered. by twitter · · Score: 1
    I could care less if the movie is as lame as you said it is. When you step back, what you see is yet another highly competitive business chosing free software to get their work done. It's ready for the servers and it's ready for the desktops and workstations and it's been that way for a long time. The same supposedly lame movie could have been made with expensive closed source crap but it would have cost more and been more trouble.

    Free software continues to prove it's the right tool for the job, that's the news here. One day, someone will use the same tools to make a movie you actually like, unless you are such a fanboy that no such movie could ever please you.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  86. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by Drathos · · Score: 1

    ok.. i'll bite..

    what's on channel 42?

    there has got to be a channel 42 on geek run tv..

    --
    End of line..
  87. Nice stories by RichiP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's nice seeing on slashdot's frontpage stories like Bill Gates' interview about Linux going nowhere and this story about Linux going everywhere.

    I swear, Bill Gates must be the worst technologist/visionary/prophet if he only sees Linux as a passing fad.

    1. Re:Nice stories by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      What, he's gonna tell his investors that there's something which does what his product can do (in most things) but for free, and that it's gonna ruin his business?

      Uh-huh.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Nice stories by RichiP · · Score: 1

      No. He doesn't have to say anything. Or if he has to, then extol on the virtues of his product. Instead of making prophecies which make him sounds stupid.

      Of course, we all know he isn't stupid. Just annoying.

  88. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by Surak · · Score: 1

    pr0n. what else? ;)

  89. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by finkployd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Channel 54: The Linux channel! Kernel hacker Alan Cox takes you line-by-line through the Linux source code!

    Hot Damn! I would LOVE to see that :)

    Finkployd

  90. Linux steals code, Dreamworks steals ideas by writertype · · Score: 1
    Actually, before you mod me down as a troll, I was referring to this and this , both of which will probably be better than the Dreamworks film.

    (OK, maybe just the second one. And it was a troll-y subject line. But not a troll! Not a troll!)

  91. More like... by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Finding Nemo/Sharkslayer (Something smells fishy here.)

    More like...

    LOSING NEMO!

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  92. nah, tires make a difference... by caveat · · Score: 1

    ...if i slap a set of p-zero asymmetrico's on mom's forester, it's going to handle a lot better. os obsession is more like being fixated on the paint color or something..

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  93. Microsoft owns lots of Dreamworks! by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing articles here saying "gee, nice to see something about linux instead of microsoft". This is ironic twofold, since Microsoft is a primary investor in Dreamworks, and also since they're producing a movie all on Linux. Goes to show, you should use the best OS for the job.... word processing is still better on software written primarily for Microsoft OS's.

    Search for dreamworks here:
    http://www.tux.org/pub/tux/israel/dex/DEX/m sft.htm l

    1. Re:Microsoft owns lots of Dreamworks! by bugnuts · · Score: 1
      Gah, try this link

      Relevant parts are

      The company is also devoting resources and forming alliances to offer interactive media, including children's titles, games and information products. Microsoft owns 50% of Dreamworks Interactive, MSNBC Cable, and MSNBC Interactive News. The company also recently acquired WebTV Networks, and made investments in Comcast and Apple Computer.
  94. Mac OS X and G5 for 3D Rendering and video editing by afantee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, Pixar president Ed Catmull said at WWDC last week that the dual 2 GHz G5 Power Mac was the fastest desktop computer for RenderMan.

    In addition, Final Cut Pro only runs on Mac, Apple sells Shake for $5000 on Mac OS X and $10000 on Linux and other platforms, 25% Maya sales go to Mac OS X. It looks that Mac OS X on G5 is a far better 3D and video solution than Linux, particularly now that the dual G5 Power Mac is cheaper than the dual Xeon Dell.

  95. Re:Mac OS X and G5 for 3D Rendering and video edit by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

    While I have the utmost respect for Dr. Catmull, one must remember a key player in both Pixar and Apple's operations: Steve Jobs.

    Of course this is merely speculation; Apple has had a track record of focusing on multimedia. Quicktime, iTunes, Photoshop (ok so they didnt build it, but maybe they designed future Apples to run it 'better'?). It could simply be that Apple has made some design trade offs to support the RenderMan software suite.

    Or I *suppose* the G5 Power Mac could be the fastest out there, but some of us are far too anti-Mac to support that hypothesis =)

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  96. Re:Another one bites the dust by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

    I had no problem accssingh wired.com .. you are full of it.

    --
    As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  97. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by Surak · · Score: 1

    See what I mean? ;)

  98. G5 is the fastest desktop for Pixar's RenderMan by afantee · · Score: 1

    >> While I have the utmost respect for Dr. Catmull, one must remember a key player in both Pixar and Apple's operations: Steve Jobs.

    Steve Jobs created Pixar to make great movies and lots of money, not to help Apple, and virtually all of his wealth comes from the 70% Pixar stock that he owns. The company is run by very smart people like Ed Catmull who make decision in the best interest of Pixar, which is why their own render farm currently uses Lintel machines rather than Macs. But the G5 is going to change the CG landscape, and Pixar knows that from their own benchmarks.

    Does your conspiracy theory also apply to all these companies:

    Adobe

    "Thanks to the hard work of Adobe's engineers, Photoshop performs twice as fast on Power Mac G5s, when compared to any other system we've seen from Apple," said Greg Gilley, vice president, Graphics Applications Development at Adobe. "The future of Photoshop on the Macintosh platform is being geared around exploiting the power of Mac OS X and tapping the outstanding hardware performance of a new generation of Power Mac G5s."

    Luxology

    "We are simply blown away with the performance we are seeing out of the chip and the incredibly wide pipes on the motherboard which allows our 3D technology to do more in real time than we ever thought possible," said Brad Peebler, Luxology's president and co-founder.

    Pixar

    "After running our RenderMan benchmarks, we can now say that the Power Mac G5 is the fastest desktop in the world," said Ed Catmull, Pixar's president.

    Macromedia

    "The combination of Macromedia products and the new Power Mac G5 from Apple is an ideal platform for developers to create great experiences," said Norm Meyrowitz, Macromedia's president of Macromedia Products.

    Digidesign

    "Processor power is one of the prime things that makes the magic of digital audio happen. The new Power Mac G5 is going to give our customers just want they want--loads of power and a great OS that really delivers," said Dave Lebolt, Digidesign's general manager and Avid Technology vice president.

    Alias|Wavefront

    "Alias|Wavefront is extremely pleased with the performance we're seeing from our initial tests of Maya on the Power Mac G5," says Kevin Tureski, general manager, Maya Engineering at Alias|Wavefront. "From dynamics to rendering, we're seeing twice the performance with our application. Our customers will be thrilled with the Power Mac G5."

    Wolfram

    "The Power Mac G5 is a scientific dream machine," said Wolfram Research co-founder Theodore Gray. "Mathematica Version 5's enhanced support for large-scale numerical linear algebra, linear programming, and PDEs, is a perfect example of what you need a machine as powerful as the Power Mac G5 for: Everyone who uses Mathematica, or should, would do well to look at the Power Mac G5 very seriously."

  99. mis-spoke by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    when I said the animation is intricate, I meant that there would be an overly-intricate amount of detail invested in each strand, to make the clumps look particularly dynamic (as would be required of sirens)

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  100. overall aesthetic appearance of the movie by phelddagrif · · Score: 1

    I dunno, but maybe I'm the only one who is irritated by the animators/producers mixing what looks like hand drawn animation, and full CG. It looks really cheap, and segmented I find. Almost like the characters are on a different plane of existence than the Cg characters/environments. I think they should have gone all cell shaded or all rendered.

    All I'm trying to say really I guess is that the film seems to look disjointed as far as the aesthetics of the picture are concerned.

  101. Re:I feel sorry for Mac... by afantee · · Score: 1

    You obviously don't know what you are talking about.

    Linux may be used by render farms, but Mac is the platform of choices for Hollywood studios, and the G5 has the power and potential to upseat the Lintel boxes from render farms.

    Almost all Linux software is also available on Mac OS X, but the opposite is not true. Apart from the lack of mainstream tools like PhotoShop and MS Office and QuickTime on Linux, Shake (the best movie composition) costs $5000 for Mac OS X but $10000 for Linux and other platforms, 25% Maya sales come from Mac, Final Cut Pro (most popular nonlinear video editing tool) and Logic (best music production) and DVD Studio Pro are all Mac only.

    Now that the 64-bit dual 2 GHz G5 Power Mac is 200% faster and $1000 cheaper than the 32-bit dual 3 GHz Xeon Dell, the Mac suddenly becomes a much better platform than Lintel.

    Take a look at this

    http://www.luxology.net/company/wwdc03foll owup.aspx

    and these:

    Adobe

    "Thanks to the hard work of Adobe's engineers, Photoshop performs twice as fast on Power Mac G5s, when compared to any other system we've seen from Apple," said Greg Gilley, vice president, Graphics Applications Development at Adobe. "The future of Photoshop on the Macintosh platform is being geared around exploiting the power of Mac OS X and tapping the outstanding hardware performance of a new generation of Power Mac G5s."

    Luxology

    "We are simply blown away with the performance we are seeing out of the chip and the incredibly wide pipes on the motherboard which allows our 3D technology to do more in real time than we ever thought possible," said Brad Peebler, Luxology's president and co-founder.

    Pixar

    "After running our RenderMan benchmarks, we can now say that the Power Mac G5 is the fastest desktop in the world," said Ed Catmull, Pixar's president.

    Macromedia

    "The combination of Macromedia products and the new Power Mac G5 from Apple is an ideal platform for developers to create great experiences," said Norm Meyrowitz, Macromedia's president of Macromedia Products.

    Digidesign

    "Processor power is one of the prime things that makes the magic of digital audio happen. The new Power Mac G5 is going to give our customers just want they want--loads of power and a great OS that really delivers," said Dave Lebolt, Digidesign's general manager and Avid Technology vice president.

    Alias|Wavefront

    "Alias|Wavefront is extremely pleased with the performance we're seeing from our initial tests of Maya on the Power Mac G5," says Kevin Tureski, general manager, Maya Engineering at Alias|Wavefront. "From dynamics to rendering, we're seeing twice the performance with our application. Our customers will be thrilled with the Power Mac G5."

    Wolfram

    "The Power Mac G5 is a scientific dream machine," said Wolfram Research co-founder Theodore Gray. "Mathematica Version 5's enhanced support for large-scale numerical linear algebra, linear programming, and PDEs, is a perfect example of what you need a machine as powerful as the Power Mac G5 for: Everyone who uses Mathematica, or should, would do well to look at the Power Mac G5 very seriously."

  102. Re:This could kind of "protect" Linux from lawsuit by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

    "Just say no to zionism!"

    OK. As long as we say no to islamic terrorists/fundementalists too.

    All intolerance is criminal.

    --
    As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  103. Linux is good; Ray Harryhausen was better by rubicon7 · · Score: 1

    All this fancy-schmancy CG stuff can't hold a candle to good-old stop-motion photography.

    The Golden Voyage of Sinbad
    Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger

    Thanks for the cheese, Ray.

    --
    --- We are not in the 8th dimension. We are over New Jersey.
  104. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually those sound like a major improvement.. I might bother getting cable if they had channels like that. The only channels I really like are like Discovery, TLC, and stuff like that.. though I admit I also watch MTV/VH1 and The Cartoon Network.

    Actually though I think geeks could make really good television. A lot of us are real movie/tv buffs and are actually pretty funny. I've actually thought about making a tv series of my life.. something like a combination Jerry Springer, Seinfield, and Freaks & Geeks. I think it'd be pretty popular.. especially with my fellow geeks. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  105. Watch, buy, and rip. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Sure go watch the movies.. buy the movies.. rip the movies.. give copies to everyone you can. I sugegst printing out a stack of copies of your favorite movie and print fairly legit looking disc labels.. then leave them in places where people are likely to pick up copies. Leave them there anonymously and you can't be busted.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  106. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

    Why should they care? What they care about is using the right tool for the right job. Also, producers are not advertisers; they hand advertising over to the advertising team, who then makes the call on how to advertise the piece.

    The Dreamworks IT team responsible for making this production work on Linux is hardly responsible for marketing the movie as well. The fact of the matter is, WindowsMedia.com has brand recognition and is a popular site, and the logistics are taken care of by someone else.

    Speaking of popular sites for movie trailers, have you ever heard of Apple QuickTime? They've got this great little movie trailers site, and it's always the first place I check. I found the Sinbad trailer right away.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  107. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Huh? Will someone please mod that down.

    --
    Why not fork?
  108. Re:Eh... by ignorant · · Score: 1

    well OK.. that is the O/S. But what software did they use?

    I guess some custom stuff? Any freeware alternatives available out there?

    - S

    --
    Alive, occupying space and exerting gravitational pull.
  109. Re:Newsbreak: Baked producers find women a "proble by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

    Me thinks the Dreamworks team had a whole lot of wholesome fun while making the movie.

    I'm sure in the Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within build scripts there's support for make -Daki=naked...

  110. Imagine... by Britz · · Score: 1

    a movie about the old Scandinavian warrior called Beowulf all done on Linux.

    OK, OK, it is not funny, but I didn't see the CowboyNeal Option and I thought something was missing.

  111. Re:This could kind of "protect" Linux from lawsuit by motown · · Score: 1

    OK. As long as we say no to islamic terrorists/fundementalists too.

    All intolerance is criminal.


    I agree with you 100%. I reject fundamentalism as well as zionism and especially the terrorism originating from both.

    --
    "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
  112. Totals by Redbw6 · · Score: 1

    It seems like a great movie...I just have a feeling that it's not going to do as well as people hope. It seems like older people might be more interested in it than younger kids. Heck, kids have no idea who Brad Pitt and Catherine Zeta Jones are.

  113. Re:Ironic... Give me a break folks. by babbage · · Score: 1

    How many home shopping channels are there? How many run sports all day long? You make it sound like it's not dreadful already, oy vey...