Slashdot Mirror


The Thermal Paste Revolution

arhines writes "ZZZ is running an article about an interesting new thermal paste which surpasses even solder in thermal conductance by 33 percent. If this paste makes it to the market sometime soon, we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes. In fact, if use of the paste becomes commonplace, it may even give the semiconductor industry a little speed boost."

255 comments

  1. Hmmm. by James+A.+A.+Joyce · · Score: 1

    "In fact, if use of the paste becomes commonplace, it may even give the semiconductor industry a little speed boost."

    Not if it doesn't dry as quickly as solder, not if it's more brittle than solder, and not if it's stronger than solder. That's the thing with solder - it's a "good enough" solution so it'll probably last quite a while yet.

    1. Re:Hmmm. by esoteric0 · · Score: 1

      not necessarily... a lot of companies are trying to move to a lead-free scheme, and this might be a good way to do it.

    2. Re:Hmmm. by Kenja · · Score: 2, Funny

      But without the lead, wouln't it taste rather bad?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Hmmm. by silvaran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you misunderstood the statement. They may have compared the thermal conductance of this material to solder, but they're not looking to replace solder. Solder is made up of metals, so it's naturally a good conductor. But metal doesn't spread very well over microscopic cracks -- and no, you can't fill in the cracks with solder, because the metal will contract when it cools and be useless as a thermal paste. You wouldn't want to use a thermal paste as a solder, because thermal paste typically takes a very, very long time to dry when not exposed (ie: between a cpu and a heatsink).

      So it looks like CowboyNeal is saying if this new thermal paste can improve the effectiveness of a heatsink (and fan) by a reasonable amount, manufacturers will be able to push their clock speeds a little higher.

    4. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's the thing with solder - it's a "good enough" solution so it'll probably last quite a while yet.

      Huh? Did you even READ the fucking article?

      1) Solder isn't being "replaced" with this paste anytime soon
      2) Solder has really nothing to DO with this article other than being a known excellent thermal conductor and as such, a useful benchmark for comparing other thermal compounds.
      3) Try applying molten solder on your cpu for purposes of thermal protection. Just try it! :p

    5. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times a day do I wish for a "-1 Idiot" moderation option.

    6. Re:Hmmm. by gilmour14 · · Score: 1

      They didn't say it conducted electricity better than solder and it doesn't look like the goal is to replace solder. Just as far as heat sinking, this new paste will conduct heat better than existing products.

  2. Thermal Paste needs a revolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    surpasses even solder in thermal conductance by 33 percent. If this paste makes it to the market sometime soon, we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes.

    I dunno, personally, I really think Astroglide Is just fine for my purposes as it is.

    1. Re:Thermal Paste needs a revolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You must really love your computer.

  3. Actually... by jbardell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    " Lots of OEM or low end cooling setups use either a thermal interface pad (TIM) or that white goop you get at radio shack. The fact is that neither of those does a great job of transferring heat from the processor to the heatsink. While they work ok, they don't exactly assist Moore's law in fulfilling itself by limiting clock speeds with heat." Actually, that's hardly true at all. RS's compound has been found to be one of the best out there. Just take a look at some reviews that include it.

    1. Re: Actually... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Interesting


      > > Lots of OEM or low end cooling setups use either a thermal interface pad (TIM) or that white goop you get at radio shack. The fact is that neither of those does a great job of transferring heat from the processor to the heatsink. While they work ok, they don't exactly assist Moore's law in fulfilling itself by limiting clock speeds with heat.

      > Actually, that's hardly true at all. RS's compound has been found to be one of the best out there. Just take a look at some reviews that include it.

      I built a couple of Athlons that kept barfing on CPU-intensive jobs due to overheating, and they ran about 3C cooler after peeling off the pad and replacing it with silver-based paste.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Actually... by gfody · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AFTER peeling off the pad?! you know your suppose to peel that off BEFORE you install the cpu, right?

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OEM's use Shin Etsu G751 (or a derivative). It's tough to spread on the core but it is an excellent TIM. Even better than Arctic Silver.

    4. Re: Actually... by Handpaper · · Score: 1

      My system (Athlon 1200) is now stable for the first time in over a year thanks soley to silver-based paste. Prior to this I experienced unexplained X-server restarts, segfaults and kernel panics on a weekly basis, mainly due to the TIM, which had dried out and was falling out of the CPU/heatsink interface in pieces. Ironically, had I still been running Win98, I would have got a GPF, which would have immediately suggested "Hardware Fault". Still, at least I've learned the value of backups.

    5. Re:Actually... by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've repaired many home and car audio amplifiers and I've gone through probably a pint of heat sink compound over the last few years. I once bought a big toothpaste size tube of that GC brand heatsink compound and I only used about half of it before I had to throw it away. The stuff is runny and inconsistant, while the Radio Shack grease is expensive and only comes in little tubes, but flows evenly and doesn't drip.

    6. Re: Actually... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep. If you peeled off that pad first, you would have probably gotten another 2-3 degrees. The pad uses a "wax-like" substance (i.e. a solid a room temperature, but liquid when lightly heated). The problem is with pads is that once you heat them after being installed, the wax-like substance just imbedded itself into all the microscopic cracks and holes on the top of both your processor and heatsink (doing its job). But now it is there, it doesn't just come off when you peel off that pad. It is there, and there pretty much for good, acting as a barrier between your heatsink and CPU and any other better thermal compound you use aftward.

      Now, I didn't say it was there perminent, but it is close to it. You can get it off the heatsink, as you simply need to heat up the heatsink (a very hot hair-dryer will do this). Once you heat it up, you can start wiping the heatsink down with a cloth. Or you can lap your heatsink (use several grades of sandpaper to get a polished, flat, smooth surface, usually starting with 100-300 grit paper and working your way up to 1000-3000 grit paper, depending on how "anal" you are :) ). This will remove the outer layer of the heatsink metal as well as the microscopic cracks and holes on it, which will include your heat-pad substance.

      The CPU is almost impossible to fully remove the heat-pad substance. You don't want to lap a modern day CPU, as all you will do is "create" microscopic cracks and holes. Modern CPU's are laser cut and pretty much perfectly flat. There are "some" cracks, but they are much smaller/finer then almost any sand paper you will ever find. You also risk damaging the CPU as the manufacturers now have traces and transistors located micrometers from the top of the CPU surface. Heating the CPU can easily damage it if you are not careful about how hot you let it get. So it is usually very dangerous for you to try to remove the substance from the CPU if you have not already done it several times (or don't mind wasting whatever you spend on that CPU when you need to go out and buy a new one).

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    7. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the point of buying exepnsive silver-based paste if 3C reduction is all that you will get?

    8. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      just because you know the word "lap", i am not fooled, you are not an expert at this. blowdryer and cloth cleans out the microfissures? in your dreams. clogged pores and fissures render your heatsink incapable? not likely.

      whether any of this baloney is true or not, i don't know, but there's nothing to see here so, move along folks.

    9. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      whether it drips or not says nothing about its thermal efficacy. in fact, a case could be made that it's the drippiness that gets into the nooks and crannies. mostly, metal on metal is just fine and when you clamp two parts together, you only need a microthin layer to even out the contact.

      but it's nice knowing that you vote in favor of easier cleanup.

    10. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your old stuff was falling out in chunks, and "solely" the silver based paste could save it? what else did you try? oh, nothing else... jesus, this is how legends start.

    11. Re: Actually... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > What's the point of buying exepnsive silver-based paste if 3C reduction is all that you will get?

      A couple of bucks and no more signals? What was I supposed to want?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    12. Re: Actually... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Informative


      > AFTER peeling off the pad?! you know your suppose to peel that off BEFORE you install the cpu, right?

      Ah, no. You're supposed to pull off the bit of tape that keeps it from sticking to other stuff and then squish it down on the CPU. Per the manufacturer's instructions, kind of thing.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    13. Re: Actually... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Heating the CPU can easily damage it if you are not careful about how hot you let it get. So it is usually very dangerous for you to try to remove the substance from the CPU if you have not already done it several times (or don't mind wasting whatever you spend on that CPU when you need to go out and buy a new one).

      You know, that sounds like a major pain in the ass to save a few degrees. Maybe manufacturers should just make cooler CPUs instead of us needing industrial strength copper heatsinks and 19mm fans. I really miss the days when a heatsink and fan were optional on a CPU. I think my 386 was the last of that kind though. My 486DX2/66 ran fine after the fan on the heatsink failed though so the heatsink was good enough. Even most Pentium systems were just fine with a big heat sink and no fan. Nowadays all my Athlon systems sound like I'm at an airport with the 5 or 6 fans I need in my system to keep it cool.

    14. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe manufacturers should just make cooler CPUs instead of us needing industrial strength copper heatsinks and 19mm fans.

      Then check-out the mini-ITX motherboards with the VIA processors. Some of them only need a heatsink for operation.

      Seriously, it all comes down to marketing. Pushing the speed up, up and up. More speed means more heat which means bigger heatsinks and fans. If you can be satisfied with a slower system, check-out the VIA-based systems above. If you want a fast system, then you have to have to live with fans.

    15. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very true. this is the reason I order my CPU and motherboard seperately. I've ordered motherboards with CPU's installed and tested (so that I get a warranty), but its just not worth it with those crappy pads gooing up your CPU.

    16. Re: Actually... by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      You don't want to lap a modern day CPU, as all you will do is "create" microscopic cracks and holes. Modern CPU's are laser cut and pretty much perfectly flat.

      I don't know if it was your intention, but it looks like you are saying that the wafers are cut from the ingot with a laser. Is that really true? I've heard of lasers used in dicing, but not in slicing the wafer (slicing and dicing jokes aside).

      If the laser is just used in dicing, then your cpu will have nice edges, but the flatness won't be affected. And I don't think any manufacturer goes out of their way to polish the back side.

      On a side note, I've read about a lot of people lapping their cpu for flatness, but has anyone tried lapping to reduce thickness? I don't think you'd want to try it with a dremel, but I bet you could lap a cpu down to 100 um without adversely affecting it's operation.

    17. Re:Actually... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      They weren't talking about the relative performance between thermal compounds, they were talking about the actual performance of any common thermal compound.

      Sure, Radio Shack's thermal compound might be as good as any out there, but that doesn't stop it from being a pretty good insulator. It's just a little better than the air filling those gaps.

      --
      ...
    18. Re: Actually... by nil_null · · Score: 1

      What I do these days, is order slower low-power CPU's (~1 GHz Durons which are like $35 a piece). Then I use a copper heatsink that uses an 80mm fan (Thermalright SLK-800 for $35 was the last one I bought, a very good heatsink). I use nothing but quiet fans in my systems, the loudest being the one that is on the CPU heatsink, but that is muffled more than the case fans, so I don't hear it. 80mm fans can be quiet while still producing enough air flow. I've got quiet, stable systems even when my room is at temps of 85F.

      Oh btw, I've had a few 486 CPU's, and none of them had a heatsink (one of them was 66 MHz).
      I've got a Pentium II 266 which only has a heatsink on it (though I've got good case fans). I can take that thing out to the garage and run it in extreme heat during the summer, and it runs fine.

      I agree, though, that CPU manuafactures should focus a little more on making low-power desktop processors. There is Via with its C3's (you can run with only a heatsink), but supposedly those don't perform well at all. Maybe the market for low-power desktop processors just isn't there with everyone looking at MHz ratings. Though when it comes to portable devices low-power is very important.

    19. Re: Actually... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Some ICs are routinely lapped to fit them into packages that require very thin chips. IIRC taking a 1 mm chip down to 100 um is reasonable. This is an industrial process, not something you want to try at home. It's too easy to damage the side of the chip that the circuitry is on. I think the lapping is normally done at the wafer stage of production (just before dicing); most people aren't going to have their ICs in wafer form.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, bullcrap!

      I am assembling a cluster right now. The first 4 machines I brought up formed an excellent test bed for this. The pad was scratched a little on 2 of the units, and I was curious about this anyway, so I assembled 2 with the pads and 2 with regular, old white heat sink grease.

      All four units varied by less than 4 degrees C, idle or full load, and interestingly enough, the least tempreature was registered by one with a pad and the highest temp was registered by one with heat sink grease!

      As for removing the pads, I peeled them off and used a product called "goof-off" (intended to clean up latex paint on woodwork and such) to clean the heat sinks. From past experience, MEK works well too. These were fresh heat sinks (never applied to a processor or heated up) so a used heatsink pad might be more problematic.

      I have seen many, many articles on the web about lapping hetasinks, tried it myself back in the 500M to 1Ghz processor days and saw so little effect that I have never bothered again.

    21. Re: Actually... by Mooncaller · · Score: 1

      He's not talking about the die, but the package.

    22. Re: Actually... by Mooncaller · · Score: 1
      It helps to know how to apply the thermal grease. It also helps to know how to lap a heatsink. A properly laped heatsink will reduce the case to heatsink theta by between 30 and 50%. Properly applied heatsink grease results in a lower ch theta then any heatsink pad I have tested. The problem is that misapplied heatsink grease can be worse then using nothing at all. Unfortunatly, using heatsink grease properly takes some skill and experience, and is difficult in a manufacturing enviroment. So from a manufacturing point of view, heat sink pads are preferable. One more point, thermal grease is next to useless on heatsinks that are held on by those stupid little clips. Heatsinks should always be bolted, and torqed to the appropriate specification.

    23. Re: Actually... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Or you could save yourself alot of trouble and just dip the heatsink in paint thinner, which will dissolve the wax no problem. about a 10 second process.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    24. Re: Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [ The problem is that misapplied heatsink grease can be worse then using nothing at all. ]

      NOTHING can be worse than nothing!

      Even peanut butter works!

    25. Re: Actually... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      Sorry I didn't get back sooner to comment on this, but Mooncaller got most of the points that I would have made. The WHOLE reason the manufacturers use pads are because they are pretty much foolproof. The person installing the CPU doesn't have anything he/she has to do in order to do it correctly. All he/she has to do is clip the heatsink on correctly. Thermal paste is a lot harder to do correctly. Way to many people apply WAY TOO MUCH of the compound on their CPU, thinking that "it is better to apply too much then not enough", but the reality of it is that too much is easily as bad as not enough. Your metal heatsink is a much better conductor of heat then just about all the thermal compounds that are available. The only reason for the thermal compound at all is that the thermal compound is a much better conductor of heat then air is. You use the compound to displace the microscopic amounts of air that fill the microscopic holes and scratches on the heatsink and CPU. And I MEAN MICROSCOPIC! When I apply thermal compound, I usually place a drop about the size of a small grain of rice on the center of the CPU and then use a piece of plastic to spread it across most of the chip. I then clip on the heatsink and then remove it, and look to see if there was thermal compound that pushed its way across the entire face of the CPU. If it did, I usually remove some of the compound and then repeat the process. Basically, I am removing any and all eccess compound from the jointing of the heatsink and the CPU. Now others use a different approch (basically just placing a small amount and then mount the heatsink and check without spreading the compound first), but I have found that with some compounds, you can wind-up in a situation where the center of the heatsink is correctly mounted, but the rest is not in contact with the CPU, but that isn't really as much an issue with higher quality heatsinks that are available now as it was even 1 or 2 years ago. Modern, high quality heatsinks are now usually already at a polished, flat surface.

      Again, the pad came into use as well because the heatsinks themselves were not usually perfectly flat, but manytimes had a definite curve and/or bowl-like shape. The pad, being thick (especially compaired to paste), came into use because it easily handled the problem with the heatsink not always being flat, by compressing/expanding to the shape of the heatsink and CPU. Thermal paste can NOT perform this function. It requires that the overall surface be flat for both the CPU and the heatsink (or otherwise be the same, i.e. if the CPU is bowl shaped, the heatsink must be an inverse bowl/bulge of the same diameter, etc. to exactly join/bond with the CPU). But, like I said, this is no longer a major problem with modern CPU's and heatsinks. A few years ago, the end user/installer was left with the decision to have to lap their heatsink themselves or live with it as is and lose some performance.

      Like I said, lapping is no longer a required thing to do with your heatsinks, as the heatsink manufacturers already do some lapping, especially on the high quality heatsinks. Any of the high end heatsinks from Zalman or Thermalright will already have a shiny, polished surface. This isn't a polished surface in the sense that they used some wax, or other agent, it is simply polished flat by using a high grit sandpaper or polishing stone (a similar process used to make real mirrors for optical telescopes, etc., just not a concave or convex mirror surface, but one flat instead).

      I am probably being redundant at this point, but the whole idea is that paste is used because it has a higher thermal conductivity then air. Good paste has much higher thermal conductivity then a pad if only because the layer of paste is only microscopically thin, where-as the pad can usually be measured in fractions or whole millimeters. The metal of the heatsink is simply a much better heat conductor then the pads or pastes that we currently use (although there are some new pastes that are comming very close by using cerami

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    26. Re: Actually... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      I've just rebuilt an old P166 and overclocked it to 200MHz. No fan, but not much heat either, even in the current record temperatures over here in England. It ran a 100% burn-in test for an hour without crashing. It's a big heatsink and I used Arctic Silver II (mixed reviews, but works for me) between the CPU and the sink.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  4. Messy by root_b4re · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Hopefully it wont be so difficult to apply as the previous implementation of this goop

    1. Re:Messy by gfody · · Score: 4, Informative

      according to the article you dont see the 33% improvement until you apply about twice the normal pressure. imagine the cracked cores

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    2. Re:Messy by duffhuff · · Score: 4, Informative
      Correct application is critical to the effectiveness of thermal goop. The idea is to get a very thin, uncontaminated layer of the stuff between the chip and the heatsink. Any kind of oil, scratches, dust, etc. can cause efficiency to drop.

      Have a look at the instructions for Arctic Silver 3 to see what kind of steps are needed.

    3. Re:Messy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One might imagine that the addition of a surfactant in tiny quantities might be able to put quite a dent in that required pressure. Not that mechanical adjustments couldn't be made to compensate....

    4. Re:Messy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I had mod points.. That's exactly what I thought ;-)

    5. Re:Messy by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      linker's rules of white thermal paste: No matter how hard you try, some paste WILL always end up on your clothes. Do not try to avoid it-you can't. You will only spot the paste mark that evening when removing your clothes. The paste could not have made it to where it is on your clothes unless you were doubled over backwards and standing on your head at the time you applied it to the equipment.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    6. Re:Messy by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Arctic Silver Instructions:

      "and even dead skin cells can significantly affect the thermal interfaces performance, especially on modern small core CPUs as the surface area is already severely limited)".

      How much will a few dead skins cells affect the thermal performance? I want to know how many degrees of cooling I will loose. I think I will start putting my heatsinks on in a clean room now. :oP

    7. Re:Messy by Mooncaller · · Score: 1

      Even a small amount of oil and dirt from finger application can reduce the effectivness of thermal grease by 50%. That is, it can double the case to heatsink theta. A dead skin cell is a mountain in relation to the voids that the thermal grease is suppose to fill.

    8. Re:Messy by Mooncaller · · Score: 1

      Thats what torque drivers are for.

  5. Help prevent crashing routers... by LamerX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe this stuff can be put in all those crappy DSL modems and routers that freeze up due to overheating. It would be easier than modding the whole damn thing to pieces with fans and whatnot...

    1. Re:Help prevent crashing routers... by VPN3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It actually will not help much. I've used both generic and that silver based Artic Gold (can't remember if that's the brand or not). I use MotherBoard Monitor to monitor temps on my XP/Game system which is equiped with a SLK-800 heatsink and 80mm fan.

      There is a 0 degree difference between using the sivler stuff and the generic goo. I've also swapped from the goo to silver paste on my old dual 700 when replaceing a processor. No measurable difference in heat/performance.

      Your best bet with those DSL routers:

      Find a good 486 heatsink/fan combo, mix a drop of silver compound with a very small drop of epoxy, then mount the sucker on your DSL router's CPU. Use a bench clamp or book (or some combination) to secure the heatsink/fan overnight while the compound hardens. The next morning, your DSL router should run nice and cool. Keep in mind, if you use too much epoxy in your mixture, that heatsink will not be coming off there. A lighter mix will result in something you can knock off there with the handle of a screwdriver if you ever need to get it off.

      I've found old 486 sinks and fans are very handy at cooling off just about anything they'll fit on except for peltier solutions.

      If the cost of $5 is prohibitive, check your closet for old computers and find your free parts there.

    2. Re:Help prevent crashing routers... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Maybe this stuff can be put in all those crappy DSL modems and routers that freeze up due to overheating.
      It actually will not help much.... There is a 0 degree difference between using the sivler stuff and the generic goo. I've also swapped from the goo to silver paste on my old dual 700 when replaceing a processor. No measurable difference in heat/performance.
      Come on, man, that's exactly the article's point! Like way down in, oh yes, the second paragraph when zzz said "Current high end pastes range widely in composition, but in terms of performance they all fall within a very small degree range" and "...all of these products still get very similar results. A degree or two at most is all you can hope for in moving from one brand to another." But then zzz goes on to state that this new stuff is a lot better, and even better than ground up diamonds and... wait, why am I summarizing this article? It's not even a page long!
    3. Re:Help prevent crashing routers... by Artifex · · Score: 1

      Maybe this stuff can be put in all those crappy DSL modems and routers that freeze up due to overheating. It would be easier than modding the whole damn thing to pieces with fans and whatnot...



      Can you give us the names of the manufacturers of these devices? I've only had experience with a few DSL modems (mostly Westell) and a little SMC broadband router, and have never had heat-induced failure. My next router will also be an SMC, because I really liked this design. My next modem will be whatever I scrounge up, because they're probably all interchangeable at this point and the next DSL provider will try to throw one at me, also.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    4. Re:Help prevent crashing routers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell did this get modded to +5? It should be -1 offtopic.

  6. don't believe the hype? by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They seem to have just duplicated the inventor's press release - the article doesn't contain any independent evaluation of the substance whatsoever.

    1. Re:don't believe the hype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a very good duplicate either. Look at the table at the bottom. The particle sizes are given in mm, with diamond being 25 mm. For the metricly challanged, that's about one inch.

  7. 33% by gfody · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of 0.004% that thermal paste actually makes a difference

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
    1. Re:33% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. If you take the heatsink of a processor, how much paste is left where the processor touched the heatsink? Next to nothing. The thermal paste only fills tiny gaps. The heat still has to pass through a layer of silicon and several millimeters of copper/aluminum before it reaches the surface of the air-cooled (!) heatsink.

    2. Re:33% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you find yourself near a bandsaw with an extra bar of oxygen free Copper lying around, I encourage you to experiment. I ended up using wet rags to hold the copper for my electrodes, partly because I'm a pussy and partly because it was really hot.

    3. Re:33% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Copper is a good heat conductor, and that's why it's used to spread the heat to a large surface area. The thermal paste has a different job: It only has to thermally connect the heatsink to the processor. It does not need to conduct heat over comparatively big distances. The kind of gap-filler between the heatsink and the processor is not as important as makers of the only substance which costs more per milligram than inkjet ink would like you to believe (at least as long as it's not air). The gap which the paste has to bridge simply isn't big enough for the paste to make a difference, compared to the thickness of both the silicon processor layers and the heatsink.

  8. Repost for slow connections [it is in .ru] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Any of you who have ever even thought about overclocking are probably familiar with thermal paste and its function. Lots of OEM or low end cooling setups use either a thermal interface pad (TIM) or that white goop you get at radio shack. The fact is that neither of those does a great job of transferring heat from the processor to the heatsink. While they work ok, they don't exactly assist Moore's law in fulfilling itself by limiting clock speeds with heat. Yeah, CPUs are still getting faster, but one needs only to look at overclocking results with stock cooling versus those achieved with a good heatsink and good thermal paste to realize that better cooling = faster computers. Heck, if we'd stuck with the tiny old anodized fanless heatsinks on 486es, we might not be past 1GHz yet.

    Current high end pastes range widely in composition, but in terms of performance they all fall within a very small degree range. Arctic Silver has been a longtime favorite among many, simply because they were the first company to release a competitive paste - one which was actually well suited to the task of transferring heat. Nanotherm is another big name these days, and lots of people are talking about PCM+, their upcoming metal-free product. But as I said, all of these products still get very similar results. A degree or two at most is all you can hope for in moving from one brand to another. So you might resign yourself to defeat saying, "Pastes have achieved perfection, so the bottleneck must now be the heatsink and the die of the CPU itself." And that would seem to me a very reasonable thing to say...the fact that several companies are putting lots of resources into the development of more efficient thermal transfer and seeing diminishing returns is fairly strong evidence to support such a statement. But according to materials engineer Dr. Junis Chung, current thermal pastes are rubbish, hooey, and applesauce, and he has something much better.

    The paste he has created is based on dispersed carbon black (a particulate form of industrial carbon used to reinforce rubber) mixed in a soup of ethyl cellulose and polyethylene glycol. In tests comparing it to solder (a method of thermal transfer not typically used with electronic components because of the temperature required to bond it to both surfaces), the carbon paste surpassed the pure metal bond in thermal conductivity by 33%, and surpassed the taco-sntotting bond by 45% It was also superior to diamond and carbon nanotube based pastes currently undergoing development. Even if the carbon paste were to merely match the diamond and nanotube pastes, it would be a significant improvement because of the cost differences.

    Why does it work so well? Spreadability. The problem with current commercial pastes is that they have focused too long on the thermal conductivity of the material, and not on the fundamental principle of a thermal paste, which is gap filling. Silicone based 'goop' from radio shack is fairly thermally conductive, but the size of the particles and the terrible spreadability cause it to be more of an insulator than a conductor. On the other hand, using something entirely liquid such as mineral oil doesn't cool well either because it isn't conductive enough, so the key is to find something with the right balance of conductivity and spreadability. The diamond paste contained particles 25 microns wide, about as small as they can be ground down to. This is what keeps the incredibly conductive material from winning - the diamonds actually end up pushing the two surfaces apart. To check for the importance of particle size in the opposite direction (smaller than the carbon black particles), a paste based on .1 micron diameter carbon filament was also tested. One would think that the carbon filament, being only .1 micron thickness would perform better - but this is not the case. The reason, Dr. Chung believes, is because of the porosity and compressibility of carbon black. Porosity plays a big role because wh

    1. Re:Repost for slow connections [it is in .ru] by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ...and surpassed the taco-sntotting bond by 45%...

      What in the world is a "taco-sntotting" bond? Taco-Snotting? Taco-Snorting? Taco-Snot-Toting?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Repost for slow connections [it is in .ru] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to browse at -1. There was [is?] a troll about the particularly vile practice of taco snotting. A warning, if you didn't like the goatse guy, you probably won't like taco snotting.

  9. I'll Take a Barrel -- Over to SCO by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
    Give me a barrel of it to take over to SCO headquarters and hose those guys down to maybe cool them off.

    Thought about doing the same to the RIAA, but I'd need a whole tanker truck load at least there.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:I'll Take a Barrel -- Over to SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you did pour some of it on the SCO guys, it would not help. On the contrary, it would make heat dissipation even slower. Not to mention that they would be really pised off after the stunt.

      In other words, your joke sucked.

  10. Cool, but I won't do it myself... by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >"we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes"

    I won't be doing this. Such a think could void warranties. Stability and reliability is more important than speed IMHO - especially since I don't play games.

    If manufacturers start using this paste, and it doesn't deteriorate after 5 years, then that is different.

    Obviously it won't be used in resistors - as conductance is not very good in such components ;-)

    Mike

    1. Re:Cool, but I won't do it myself... by lilricky · · Score: 1

      Voiding your warranty? I've never heard of a warranty being voided because you used a better thermal interface material. I for one will being using it, if, and thats a big if at this point, its as stable and long lasting as the other pastes out there. Anything to lower my cpu temp a few more degrees.

    2. Re: Cool, but I won't do it myself... by croddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      no need to worry about voiding warranties. just pick up a bottle of ronsonol or similar lighter fluid, and wipe it off clean. no one will ever know the difference!

    3. Re:Cool, but I won't do it myself... by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1

      I think some hardware manufacturers don't like end users performing such modifications. There is always the risk of some damage occuring - especially with small/compact/advanced hardware - where 1mm of conductant paste in the wrong place could fry a processor. PC hardware is delicate equipment - imagine how much $$$ hardware vendors would be up for if they allowed this thermal paste.

      I remember reading the /. article "AMD: No Grease For You!"
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/29 /005324 0&mode=thread&tid=142

      Mike

    4. Re: Cool, but I won't do it myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or get anything with naphtha in it. goof-off will work as well.

    5. Re:Cool, but I won't do it myself... by FrzrBrn · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I won't be doing this. Such a think could void warranties."

      So, what you're saying is you're worried about the thought police cracking down on rogue warranty violators? May I suggest a tinfoil hat; perhaps without the thermal paste option?
      You are correct, however, that conductance is not very good in resistors. Hence the name resistors.

      --
      I read it on the Internet, it must be true!
    6. Re:Cool, but I won't do it myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was more solid, it would probably make a pretty good resistor. Electrically resistive, thermally conductive. So when it heats up from the power dissapation, it would do a reasonable job of releasing the heat.

  11. The Revolution by Biomechanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Thermal Paste Revolution

    Oh you bet, it will be like 'before and after', a marking point in history. As in; I remember back in the days, before the revolution.

    Remember these days people, its one of those great turning points in history and you are part of it.

    1. Re:The Revolution by BabyDave · · Score: 1

      (To the tune of "Children of the Revolution" by T Rex, obviously)

      Well you can overclock,
      Pretend you've got a huge [censored],
      But if you don't use paste,
      It's a terrible waste,

      Because you won't cool the Athlons of the Revolution,
      No you won't cool the Athlons of the Revolution, no no no (et cetera ...)

    2. Re:The Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The Thermal Paste Revolution

      Yes, but who will be first against the wall?

    3. Re:The Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO, obviously. Haven't you been paying attention?

    4. Re:The Revolution by sammy+baby · · Score: 1
      Oh, absoulutely. My favorite part:
      If this paste makes it to the market sometime soon, we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes.
      Sure, for sufficiently small definitions of "all of us." Because as soon as the definition expands to... uh... well, pretty much any of my friends, actually, nobody gives a shit.
    5. Re:The Revolution by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Yes, but who will be first against the wall?
      Would someone please peel off the pad before sticking them to the wall.
      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  12. Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, that's just perfect. Just yesterday I was looking at my Power Macintosh G4 and saying "You know, if there's one thing this computer's missing, it's paste. If only there were some way I could just take paste and smear it all over the inside of this computer."

    And now here we are!

    1. Re:Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about fufilling transhumanism as according to Gabriel.

    2. Re:Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You misunderstood something.

      It's not about applying that paste all over your computer - it has to applied to *special* parts in your computer in order to cool it down:

      The fan of your power supply unit, for example.

      It does a great job taking care that the temperature in your computer will not rise too high.

      1. Make sure that your computer is turned off !!!

      2. Just apply some of the paste (e.g. 10-15 table spoons) to the fan.

      3. No need to wait any longer. Turn that thing on again.

      4. Watch the great effect that this new thermal paste will have.

      You may also use the paste with water cooling systems. Just mix the water/paste 30/70 - don't worry about any strange noises.

      As said in another thread, tuning your computer might void your warranty - instead, you can still ask your PC dealer to do it for you (and remember: 10-15 table spoons, otherwise the effect of the paste will not "visible".)

    3. Re:Paste. by quigonn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although is posting is moderated as funny, this guy is absolutely right. I think, all the cooling stuff that is put into x86-based PCs in these days is just the wrong way. Computers should be well-designed (I'm speaking of the hardware, not the case), and when CPU manufacturers can't produce CPUs that stay cool enough with only a passive cooler, then they shouldn't sell these CPUs. I mean, powerful computers can be built without this botch. For example, all the computers built by Apple, or the VAXstations that were built by DEC. VAXstations were pretty powerful machines (especially the VS4000 series), and they came without any passive coolers. Only the PSU had a fan, which was extremely silent. And the VAXstation was a much more powerful computer than a PC at the time they were built.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    4. Re:Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh dear lord. You haven't heard a "Windtunnel" G4 at full howl, have you? ;)

      I have a QuickSilver G4 on my desk, and let me assure you, it is far from fanless. The Windtunnels (AKA "Quad Nostril") took it a step further.

      I agree that some current CPU designs are downright absurd (Intel so completely gave up on the concept of being able to cool their highly-clocked - over-clocked if you ask me - chips that they designed in a feature to slow down/turn off sections of the chip in order to lower temperatures), but passive cooling only gets you so much. I really doubt VAXstations could operate efficiently with a pair of 15,000rpm drives inside the case, which my QS handles with reasoanble aplomb (though I splurged on additional cooling - mostly a PCP&C external supply exhaust fan - to keep temps at reasonable levels).

      The last fanless Apple desktop computer I can think of were the 2nd-generation iMacs (the ones with completely clear sides, or flower-power, and whatever god-awful color scheme they came up with at the end). Everything else from their recent lineups, even portables, have had fans.

      Supposedly the G5s will feature quieter operation, by virtue of seperated thermal zones with different thermally-controlled fans exhausting air from each zone - they only spin as fast as that zone requires. To some extent, it is probably the wave of the future in this regard, in that increased thermal needs have butted up against all the buffont bettys tranquility requirements.

      But if another artist whines about how loud their 10,000+rpm drive is, and how their tuned-for-quiet-not-performance-operation IDE drive at home is quieter, I swear I'm gonna stuff a high-CFM 120mm fan in their pie-hole... and maybe a high-cfm 80mm fan in their corn chute.

      Nah. That'd be cruel.

    5. Re:Paste. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      and they came without any passive coolers.

      can also be read as: They had all active coolers.

    6. Re:Paste. by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      It would be cool, granted. But that would make for one hell of a show! ;)

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    7. Re:Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (sigh) I knew I should've left that "signed". I just can never judge how good a post was written seconds before falling asleep...

    8. Re:Paste. by quigonn · · Score: 1

      They don't even have active coolers. I know it, since I own one.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
  13. but our server is in San Diego :) by arhines · · Score: 0

    got hacked yesterday too, crazy :) see http://www.realgn.com for more info.

    1. Re:but our server is in San Diego :) by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1

      So posting a story to /. is what? testing the fixes?

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  14. Only marginally helpfull by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's been true for some time that the thermal junction between the top of the chip and the heatsink isn't nearly as important as the internal heat disipation (sp?) of the chip. While a modern chip with a decent heatsink can feel merely warm to the touch the internal gate temperature can be aproaching bounderies where the thermal stress is actually damaging gates. This is one of several barriers keeping 3D memory chips from becoming reality (the other major one is cost of manufacturing a working chip of multiple layers, but even pie in the sky lab samples have problems because of heat disipation from the core of the stack.)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Only marginally helpfull by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Then you need chips like the Terminator's. Multiple little blocks allow air flow between them. :)

      Back to my fantasy world...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:Only marginally helpfull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, it's a packaging issue. Heat can only move so fast. Your basic "glue it to a copper plate" package can only do so much.

      One way is to integrate the bare chip and its carrier into an evacuated heat-pipe based heat sink. The chip itself, and all its die-to-pin wiring, sits at the "bottom" of the heat pipe, bathed in a pool of liquid state refrigerant.

      But form factor and operational orientation can become issues. Design must be carefully considered or micro-bubbles of refrigerant form on the die surface and create momentary inefficiencies at that spot. At GHz, "mementary" is an eternity. And, it ain't cheap.

      Next you move up onto active systems. Here you're faced with pumps/compressors, plumbing, and the likelhood that both "joe sixpack" and "harvy hacker" are best left without chip packages that sport pressurized fluid ports pointed directly into the chip vault. And, it really ain't cheap.

      Heck with all that technology...

      Now I guess we can just scrap some of that black greasy gook (lamp black) that forms near candles or oil lamps, add the tiniest drop of glycol to hold it together, and smear it over our heatsinks. Heck, at least it's cheap, just hold a glass plate over the flame. Or not, as it looks like you'll need to apply nearly 70 PSI to the top of your chip carrier. I doubt your MOBO chip socket is likely to enjoy that. (1MPa=145PSI)

      Sometimes you just can't win.

  15. Now that MS has a lab for linux, $CO is the new by RLiegh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Open Source villian.
    Please update your bookmarks kthnx.

  16. This is offtopic by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Informative
    So mod away - Looking around that site, I saw lots of really interesting 'hacky' stuff that I used to see on /. all the time. (before linux was proved to be SCOs and the g5 laptops came out - okay even a year ago)

    In fact, it was ( /.ed to hell now ) one of the more techy-nerdy-geeky sites that I've seen for quite awhile. I'd love to see more, but now I'll have to wait for 2 days.

    I'm a subscriber - I pay for my right to bitch about /.

  17. Or.. by rf0 · · Score: 1

    We could just all just do extreme coolingcooling

    Rus

  18. How adhesive is that paste? by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Working in a test lab for PCs I encountered one problem with heat conducting paste: Since Intel introduced the mPGA 478 housing for their CPUs the ZIF socket on the mainboard is much smaller than the heatsink above. That means, if the paste between processor and heatsink is too much adhesive it is like the processor is glued to the heatsink and every time you remove the heatsink (e.g. for changing the CPU) you pull out the processor from a closed ZIF socket! Ok, so far the processors survived but I don't think that this is nice anyway.

    1. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by Daz3d · · Score: 0

      That reminds me of an article I read recently on Tom's Hardware, see the last picture and comments here

    2. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by aed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If possible, switch on the machine for a few minutes before removing the heatsink.
      This will heat the CPU and it will usually melt the thermal paste. It should now be easier to remove the heatsink from the cpu.

    3. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by asuffield · · Score: 1

      Twist, don't pull. Never failed me yet.

    4. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      If possible, switch on the machine for a few minutes before removing the heatsink.
      This will heat the CPU and it will usually melt the thermal paste.


      Am I crazy, or should a paste designed to conduct heat not MELT when a non-excessive amount of heat is applied to it?

    5. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      If it melts, it helps conduct heat between the two components more effectively. The more liquid a given material is made, the better it conducts heat. Just like resistors being more conductive when they are heated. In our Practical Circuits class we are taught about heat sinking and power dissipation in terms of voltage (temp diff), current (power flow), and resistance (temp diff/power flow) The moral of the story is...as long as it stays contained yes, it should melt.

    6. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      Zero Insertion Force is all it claims mate :-D

  19. Is it as good as vegemite? by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a tube of Arctic Silver 2 (yeah, I'm like two generations behind) but I'm not sure that I really needed it. This dude tried out several non-conventional thermal transfer compounds, including vegemite.(!) When properly applied, there wasn't a huge difference between them. In fact, in the (extremely specific) conditions, the vegemite and toothpaste outperformed the Arctic Silver! (Obviously, you should read the article for details.)

    The article's point isn't that you should be using toothpaste; rather, it's that make sure you properly apply whatever thermal compound you do use, and don't expect miracles. No matter how effective your thermal transfer, you've still got to dump the heat somewhere. If you're running close to the edge of thermal failure, there are almost certainly other, much more effective cooling solutions. This new paste is probably a good thing, but don't expect miracles.

    1. Re:Is it as good as vegemite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a close read of the article. The scientists says quite a bit of what you just said. This new thermal grease is a lot easier to apply.

    2. Re:Is it as good as vegemite? by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      In fact, in the (extremely specific) conditions, the vegemite and toothpaste outperformed the Arctic Silver!

      While I'm not inclined to read the article, I'm hoping that the aforementioned test was the taste test.

  20. Thermal Grease and AMD's Warranty by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:Thermal Grease and AMD's Warranty by oobar · · Score: 1

      This is misleading. While true, it only applies to BOXED RETAIL CPUs from AMD. Their reasoning is that if you buy a retail CPU and use it with -anything- but the supplied fan, heat sink, or phase-change thermal material, you void your warranty. That's a pretty straightforward situation, you have to use the supplied combo to qualify for a warranty. They are concerned about the conductivity of some metal-bearing pastes, and the thermal pump-out issue. Go try to get warranty service for an engine-related issue from Ford or GM after installing an aftermarket intake and see how far you get.

      Most of us don't buy retail CPUs because of the price premium (and rather pedestrian heat sink/fan) and hence this is not an issue at all. For OEM CPUs, your warranty is with your vendor, not AMD, and most vendors are pretty sane about honoring their stated warranty (be that 14 days, 30 days, whatever) regardless of what thermal paste you use, as long as you didn't do damage to the chip installing it. And in the vast majority of cases, if a chip is going to fail because of a defect it will fail in the initial burn-in period which would fall under most vendors' warranty. Barring cooling/power supply failures, if it makes it past the first week it's probably going to last until you decide to upgrade it.

    2. Re:Thermal Grease and AMD's Warranty by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Informative

      A year and a half ago I purchased looking at getting an 1800+ Athlon XP. I ended up purchasing it at a local computer show. At the show, I could either choose retail or OEM. Retail was $12 more, but had a 3 year warranty instead of the retailers 14 day. I much rather pay a little extra for a significantly longer warranty. I figured that if AMD feels that the supplied fan/heatsink is good enough, then let them replace it if it cooks itself.

      As a side note, AMD has a page that shows a list of recommended 3rd party termal solutions, even though they are not covered under the processor-in-a-box warranty.

    3. Re:Thermal Grease and AMD's Warranty by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Which is ridiculous since the thermal pads and heatsinks they ship with their processors won't keep the CPU under 65C under normal load.

      At least not on my Athlon. I replaced the heatsink with a monster and huge fan. Now I sleep well in my apartment since all the white noise drounds out my neighbors. =)

      Only problem is the A/C bill has gone up...

      And I'm not kidding... my room is 5-6 degrees warmer than the living room, even with a large fan pointed towards the top of my doorway to push the hot air out =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  21. But by Kelz · · Score: 2

    How does it compare to water cooling, and when would something like this become mainstream enough for chip-makers to build their hardware around it?

    Seems like a promising technology, just might take a while to get here.

    1. Re:But by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You still use Thermal Grease when water-cooling. The water block just replaces a heatsink. The biggest problem with thermal grease and water cooling is that you lack the vibration of the fan to help the grease settle properly into the tiny gaps, so it actually takes a couple of weeks to get a noticable change in temperature. Maybe this stuff would help, I don't know the /. effect seems to have cooked their server.

    2. Re:But by Psyko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Technologies like this are complementary to each other.

      As someone previously pointed out, one of the major problems facing device manufacturers is transferring the heat out of the die. When improvements are made in this area, then the problem will still be transferring the heat away from the die where it can be dissipated by however (water cooled slug, air cooled sink, etc. etc.) once the heat can be effectively moved away from the die-face at 99.999% efficiency there's still the issue of radiating the heat away from the assembly altogether. Then there is still the ambient air temp (have you priced out a redundant 10+ ton HVAC system for a datacenter lately?)...

      It's all a catch 22 but anytime a significant improvement is made in one of these areas is leads to higher performance and lower costs (tolerances can come down or stay at the same level for a bit while increasing performance), which by themselves may seem minor, but when they are all taken together make a significant improvement.

      --
      01:36AM up 426 days, 2:46, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.05
    3. Re:But by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      No, you can use it with water cooling. You always put thermal gunk goes between the water cooled plate and the processor anyway- this is just much better gunk.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  22. Clock speeds up by phorm · · Score: 1

    manufacturers will be able to push their clock speeds a little higher.

    But of course, clock speeds are already getting very high, and bus speeds are lagging behind again.

    What I wonder is if it makes the cooling process more efficient. My CPU gets to a certain temperature where in the summer it makes my legs uncomfortably warm with the blown-off heat. Would this conduct more heat away from the CPU initially, thus keeping older CPU's from reaching leg-burning potentials?

    1. Re:Clock speeds up by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Informative

      the net amount of heat generated by the processor will remain the same, so I'd suggest moving either the box or your legs to solve that one...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:Clock speeds up by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Funny
      the net amount of heat generated by the processor will remain the same, so I'd suggest moving either the box or your legs to solve that one...
      I suggest covering your legs (the side away from the CPU) with the thermal paste.
    3. Re:Clock speeds up by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      I suggest covering your legs (the side away from the CPU) with the thermal paste.

      And then use a good-sized fan blowing directly onto your legs. Most people make the mistake of having the fan blow away, which just won't do in this case.

    4. Re:Clock speeds up by gilmour14 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe don't sit in front of the computer so long.

    5. Re:Clock speeds up by operagost · · Score: 1

      I prefer using a peltier (warm side out, of course). And water cooling.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Clock speeds up by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Actually, it can make it worse. With better heat conduction, you'll be able to clock your processor faster, generating even more heat because the new paste will draw the heat away from the proc faster.

    7. Re:Clock speeds up by lostinchicago · · Score: 1

      computer cases are designed to have proper air flow and heat exauset. Doing things like removing the side pannel or leaving open slot covers and vacant drive bay covers can upset that flow. Disassembled cases can be the cause for overheating in some cases

    8. Re:Clock speeds up by patchmaster · · Score: 1
      I suggest covering your legs (the side away from the CPU) with the thermal paste.
      And if you use the white stuff from Radio Shack you'll be protected from sunburn!
  23. Only on /. by RHIC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only on Slashdot would you ever see the words "interesting" and "thermal paste" used together.

    1. Re:Only on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to come to terms with your inner geek.

    2. Re:Only on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I saw those two words together on Anand as well.

  24. Cooling Methods by paulnuyu · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article on thermal paste is quite interesting, such advances are sure to aid in the cooling levels for the near future. However, I often wonder why there hasn't been much development in the way of devising viable (read: cheap) alternative cooling solutions (e.g water/fliud, air piping, effective passive cooling). It seems that the now archaic heatsink/fan just isn't cutting it anymore, at least down to a bearable level that is (the amount of noise my cpu fan creates is ridiculous).

    Part of this is the chip maker's fault, for running the chip too hot/fast. Likewise, part of the fault rests on the case/fan manufacturers, as the cases become increasingly smaller, dealing with cooling becomes harder, as there is less space to work in.

    It is getting to the point where I feel that my peace of mind with regards to noise is well worth the sacrifice of speed. After all, I don't need the full power of my cpu most of the time, just when compiling/rendering/encoding. The cpu just isn't the bottleneck anymore, and it's useless to continue in this speed race, not until the other system components catch up. Why doesn't the industry work together to create a better solution? It's high time I'm rid of the constant roar of these machines.

    1. Re:Cooling Methods by echucker · · Score: 1

      Part of this is the chip maker's fault, for running the chip too hot/fast. Likewise, part of the fault rests on the case/fan manufacturers, as the cases become increasingly smaller, dealing with cooling becomes harder, as there is less space to work in.

      You left out one, teesny, weenst, ity bitty, (well, OK friggin' huge!) portion of the equation - the customer. If there's a demand for a faster chip, the manufacturer is going to make it. Your logic here is similar to blaming accidents on Ferrari for building cars that go really fast, and not the people crash that them.

  25. Who is going to use paste instead of solder? by khaine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems a very odd comparison to me; when was the last time you soldered a heatsink to a hot component or used paste to assemble a circuit board? The use in chips seems a little suspect too..

    I can just see the warnings now. "Do not mount vertically or internal circuits will drip out!!!" :-)

    1. Re:Who is going to use paste instead of solder? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      Solder paste is commonly used (commercially) to manufacture circuit boards. You put a silk screen overlay on the board and squeegee the paste through the silk screen onto the pads of the board. You then have the pick and place machine put all the components onto the board. The board / goop / components then goes into an oven where the assembly is heated enough to cause the solder to "melt" and flow. Voila -- complete board.

      Of course, all of this is more or less automated...

      Oh, and although I have soldered heat sinks on before, I prefer to use thermally conductive epoxies... I am a "Production Support Engineer" -- at least that's what my business cards say...

  26. who CARES? by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Informative
    * this is going to make a couple of degrees difference, tops. you'd have more effect moving your case a couple of inches further from the wall

    * who runs within 2 degrees of max temp for their CPU? some crazy overclockers, but it's not exactly reliable practice, is it? if it was 10 degrees, maybe but it's not going to make that much difference

    * stop knocking the thermal pads. retail CPUs use these because joe sixpack can't f*vck it up and claim on their warranty. if you don't like it, scrape it off and stick a blob of arctic silver or similar

    * bear in mind AMDs warranty only applies if you use approved thermal solutions

    1. Re:who CARES? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      if you don't like it, scrape it off and stick a blob of arctic silver or similar

      I just love it how everyone get's suckered into the Arctic silver junk or the other overhyped crap.

      Type 44 is the ONLY type to use. It's cheaper, better and is trusted by the United States Military for All Semiconductor Heat sink applications.

      If it doesnt have a milspec number on it, it is junk/crap/utter garbage....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:who CARES? by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i don't give a flying fsck what anyone uses.
      i've got a sachet of generic cpu aluminium oxide stuff that came free with a heatsink that's enough to treat about 30 CPUs at a guess, that i've been using. arctic silver's easy to get hold of - it may be much more expensive than a tub of generic heat paste from an electrical components shop, but it's still only a couple of quid.

      a milspec number might indicate quality, but the converse is not true. plenty of good things don't have a military spec number on them...

    3. Re:who CARES? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2, Informative

      * stop knocking the thermal pads. retail CPUs use these because joe sixpack can't f*vck it up and claim on their warranty. if you don't like it, scrape it off and stick a blob of arctic silver or similar

      * bear in mind AMDs warranty only applies if you use approved thermal solutions


      One of the suggestions made by this article is that this carbon-black paste may eventually become the standard. If it works at all, it'll probably become an AMD approved thermal solution. Who knows what'll happen in the long run? Incidentally, the same applies to the other kinds of thermal paste mentioned in the article (a diamond-based type and a carbon-nanotube type), should one of them become the standard.

      * who runs within 2 degrees of max temp for their CPU? some crazy overclockers, but it's not exactly reliable practice, is it? if it was 10 degrees, maybe but it's not going to make that much difference

      Backing up a bit, if a superior thermal paste does become standard, then the argument is that CPU makers might be willing to release processors which run a tiny bit faster than they would have otherwise. The rationale is that the extra cooling permitted by the paste will allow CPUs which are a bit faster while still running at acceptable temperatures. Two degrees may allow 3.2Ghz CPUs to run at 3.3Ghz while maintaining the same temperature, for example.

    4. Re:who CARES? by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't know, the hotter a processor gets, the less stable it is. It counts, especially when overclocking. Just because the processor isn't reaching the 80c temperatures that it takes to kill it doesn't mean that its fine. Besides, its much cheaper to buy thermal paste to get 2-5 degrees lower than it is to buy a new heatsink. That 2-5 degrees cooler would leave more overhead for stability.

    5. Re:who CARES? by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      no shit, sherlock.

      stability vs temperature is a bell-curve - this is how AMDs production lines work, for example.
      two different brands of paste, correctly applied, will *not* give you 5 degrees heat differential, though, in case you didn't know.

    6. Re:who CARES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luddite.

    7. Re:who CARES? by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 1

      Maybe you've never seen this thermal paste roundup. All of the pastes were applied correctly, and there was a difference of 5.5c at idle and 13c at load between the highest and lowest performing pastes rewiewed.

    8. Re:who CARES? by AuraSeer · · Score: 1

      If it doesnt have a milspec number on it, it is junk/crap/utter garbage....

      ROFLMAO!

      What an odd little world you live in. You really should take those pills like the nice doctor says, they'll make the voices stop.

  27. Analysis by fven · · Score: 5, Informative

    This may help solve the problem that thermal compound applied badly is worse (in terms of temperature) than none at all.

    In a thermal compound we are seeking somethng that:
    (1) will conduct heat to the heatsink better than air
    (2) will remain inert under extended high temperature exposure
    (3) is non toxic (nice seeing as we have to deal with the stuff)

    It is difficult for a material to conduct heat better than air if (large or many) air bubbles are present between the two surfaces, trapped by the compound itself.

    So we all know how silicone performs, it meets 2 and 3 but there are some issues with 1, mainly because of the air bubble issue.

    Carbon black, polyehtylene glycol and ethyl cellulose are both non-hazardous and ethyl cellulose is only mildly hazardous (Material Safety Data Sheets www.merck.co.th, criterion 3 met)
    Particulate size is small (should lick the air bubble problem).
    Spreadability should be a-ok (ethyl cellulose is a molding compound.
    No polymerisation or other chemical reaction should occur (stable mixture, criterion 2 met).
    Carbon is a brilliant conductor in this form ( criterion 1 met)

    I think it'll work

  28. Well I'm disappointed... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If this paste makes it to the market sometime soon, we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes."

    I was expecting a flurry of +3, Funnies over that line.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Well I'm disappointed... by tommck · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yeah, I asked my wife if she'd put it in her box, but she just ignored me...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    2. Re:Well I'm disappointed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bevis: heh heh heh heh ... heh heh ... he said flurry.

  29. Cooling Technology by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cooling technology has been around for decades. Take a look at old Cray supercomputers or IBM ECL mainframes. The problem is that it has to be designed into the system from the beginning, not tacked on to an existing design.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Cooling Technology by ftzdomino · · Score: 1

      There is also the problem that Fluorinert costs $400 per gallon.

  30. Noisy fans by mhifoe · · Score: 1
    The last computer I bought came with a HSF that ran at 6000 rpm. The noise was ridiculous. The PSU also made quite a racket.

    I bought an Artic Cooling temperature controlled HSF that achieves the same performance running at 2000 rpm. I also bought a Forton PSU with 120mm fan. I now have trouble telling whether my computer is switched on.

    If computer noise annoys you, take a look as this site.

  31. Myths about the use of thermal grease. by tombrown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 10 years ago I was working on a product that used 200 Amp IGBT's for a traction drive. I spent about a month researching the thermal circuits used to cool these devices.

    The conclusion: The best thermal contact is metal to metal. The best way of acheiving this is by "lapping" the contact area's together with a fine abrasive. Once your have done this the application of a minute amount of thermal grease improves conductivity by less than 0.5%. We also discovered that applying more than a fine film or grease significantly decreased the conductivity (10% or more).

    Lay off the grease!

    1. Re:Myths about the use of thermal grease. by tombrown · · Score: 0, Troll

      you appear to have issues were you breast fed as a child? in 14 words you have revealed your true self, and I'm amazed that you can type so well with one hand.

    2. Re:Myths about the use of thermal grease. by confused+one · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Generally true (also from production experience) although using compounds high in metal (like silver) generally produced slightly better results. Production costs generally don't support the small differences though, So you have to go with the combination of what works and is cheapest.

  32. forget paste: it is the past! by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    these guys will "solder" your heatsink to your substrate. To be released in 2004.

    I found this in this article:
    A better thermal interface, 70.0W/mK

  33. 9 out of 10 dentists agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you brush with thermal paste you can overclock your mind by 11.5%

  34. Re:THERMAL SCHMERMAL by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

    Are you Ralph Wiggum?
    enquiring minds need to know...

    --
    Acid House saves Souls
  35. How to correctly apply thermal paste. by KennethE · · Score: 1

    I wonder why noone use this method:

    Put a small amount of silicon paste on a plate and add enough gasoline, the kind you use as a solvent at home, to make it thin enough. Then apply it with a cotton tip or a brush to cover the whole area thinly and press together quickly before the solvent evaporates.

    This way you can be sure that it just fills out the cracks, whihout actually separate the CPU and the heat sink.

  36. Re:THERMAL SCHMERMAL by packeteer · · Score: 1

    If you had ever actual eaten thermal paste you would know its not that bad. And yes i HAVE eaten it and no it WASN'T on purpose but i have...

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  37. heat-transfer problems - CPU in a SLOT(TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was just thinking if heat's the problem, shouldn't we fix the problem at the source?

    [here goes]

    after socket 7 died and intel brought out the chip in a slot:
    |
    ===
    i cursed a year long and didn't buy any computer
    for two years.

    but AMD did the right thing and stuck to the "normal" socket:
    _
    ===
    but maybe now (2003) it is again time to look at the CPU in a slot, because of heat transfer problems. if the CPU where in a slot (again) one could cool it from both sides or even "thru" or around the CPU?:

    ->|->
    =====

    inspired by AGP8xpro!

    maybe ASUS will integrate a small ALUpipe thru the motherboard and for the MODers out their, they can pump water or gas(NEON!!!) or just plain air thru it?

  38. What? by Hulver · · Score: 1
    I must admit, this is the first time I've seen a post containing "Taco-snotting" up at +5.

    the carbon paste surpassed the pure metal bond in thermal conductivity by 33%, and surpassed the taco-sntotting bond by 45%
  39. Moderators GET A CLUE by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Moderators - please note that my post was the first to mention how warranties might become void using this thermal paste.

    Look at the post times... why is my post 'redundant' when other/later "1 liners" about warranties are moderated '+5 informative'?

    I have excellent karma - in this case you moderators are the trolls.

  40. I don't know didley shit about hardware.... by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 1

    ...manufacturing, but can anyone tell me why they can't just make the things (CPU) bigger? If they increased the size of the actual little, nearly microscopic components that must be inside, maybe it wouldn't be such an issue. Like I said, I don't know squat about how they are made, but when I look at them I think, 'of course their hot as hell, it's all packed into this little silver square for christ's sake!

    1. Re:I don't know didley shit about hardware.... by nojayuk · · Score: 1
      ...manufacturing, but can anyone tell me why they can't just make the things (CPU) bigger?

      Speed and cost. The smaller the chip the less signal lag between transistors and the faster the chip can run. The smaller the chip the more chips can be made per "slice" of silicon wafer hence reducing the cost per chip. Unfortunately switching faster dissipates more heat in a smaller area. Temperature increases are exponential, not linear with chip size reduction.

      I can envisage AMD and Intel eventually moving to a CPU carrier that has an integral liquid cooling block bonded directly to the silicon, giving up on air-cooling via third-party heatsink/fan combinations.

    2. Re:I don't know didley shit about hardware.... by rongallant · · Score: 1

      larger chip = more material between transistors = more resistance = more power needed = more heat.

      Smaller chips are cooler. Though they are running them at much higher tolerances now.

      --
      Ron http://www.chizeledlight.com/
  41. Our Boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes

    I don't have a box, you insensitive clod!

  42. Other uses by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1, Funny

    I predict that this thermal paste will be useful for putting down one's pants. In order to conduct heat away from any hot grits present.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Other uses by Clubber+Lang · · Score: 1

      I predict that this thermal paste will be useful for putting down one's pants. In order to conduct heat away from any hot grits present.

      Just make sure you take the Natalie Portman effect into consideration, or else you might get a lethal beowulf cluster on your hands. I heard Stephen King forgot... he was truely an American icon.

      --
      Actuaries - making accountants look interesting since 1949
  43. Does not matter... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    ... as termal conductivity is really not that important in termal grease. It has to be applied in a very thin layer anyway. One of the reasons is to avoid "pumpout" when it gets heated up. And as long as it does not reach copper in termal conductivity (something solder is not even close to, so this is a red herring), termal reasons also speak strongly against using thick layers. Far more important is long-term stability, non-conductivity and chemical non-agressiveness.

    This nonsense reminds me of part of the HiFi industry, where they offer gold plated cables (actually worse because there is an additional metal layer change, giving some uV of additional noise) at hugely inflated prices.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Does not matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "THERMAL" for God's sake!!!

  44. Solution: Power Macintosh G5 by Daniel+Jansen · · Score: 1

    It doesn't run your daddy's OS, but the Power Macintosh G5 has 9 variable speed fans, multiple cooling zones, and rethinks the entire cooling/noise thing. On top of that, it has a spectacular GUI on top of a Mach kernel -- BSD Unix for the rest of us.

  45. solder? by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    ZZZ is running an article about an interesting new thermal paste which surpasses even solder in thermal conductance by 33 percent.

    You mean I can unsolder the heatsink off my AMD now?

    Well... I really don't have to do much for that, it'll just pull off on its own after a couple minutes of use.

    1. Re:solder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overclock it for a while with the fan off and it'll just melt off.

  46. Freeze due to overheating? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    Oh, so that's how those elemental damage swords work, that deal both fire and cold damage...

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  47. Wouldn't help much by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Read the article closely. You'll see that one of the main points is that even if you did spread it nicely the size of the particles in the silicon paste prevents the surfaces from mating properly. The carbon particles on the other hand are soft enough to distort and allow surface imperfections to mate.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  48. Tried it by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I lapped the heatsink mirror smooth then I lapped the CPU until bare metal circuitry was exposed and put them together but now it won't boot up. Please advise.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  49. slashdot effect by dcsmith · · Score: 1

    From the references page as of 09:38 Eastern:

    FORUM TEMPORARILY DISABLED DUE TO /.

    --
    This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  50. Low Temp KY by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be a breakthrough for heat dissipating sexual lubricants.

    "Honey, don't use so much, the Slashdot guys said to use a thin layer."

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  51. One more point by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    The other point the article made was that particle size and hardness prevents the surfaces from mating properly. Since the carbon particles are so small and can be deformed they won't preclude this from happening.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  52. Curse thermodynamics! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Said in best Charlton Heston voice)

    Damn you entropy! DAMN YOU TO HELL!!!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  53. Dammit! Not another one! by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, I don't WANT another cooling method... I don't want processor makers to be able to squeeze another few MHz out of their processors for one simple reason... They run too damn hot already!

    I say this for two important reasons:

    #1. More heat happens to mean that much more power is being wasted. Here in CA, electricity is expensive, and my electric bill doubled when I hooked-up my new system. Now I'm paying more for the electricity to keep my computer running 24/7 (yes, it needs to be running) than I am for my 1.5M/768kbps DSL... That's just so very wrong.

    #2. I live in a big damn desert... That means temperatures are regularly very close to 130F degrees... It seems like 9 months out of the year temperatures are above 100F, and keeping a system cool when temperatures are that high is not easy. I've been forced to install a swamp cooler near my computers, and although that does a good job of cooling, it is louder than the most annoying computer fan you've ever heard, so it's not a plesant solution. Don't talk to me about water cooling/heat pipes becasue they only conduct the heat out of the computer, leaving it to heat up the building. Don't talk about sucking the heat outdoors, because it's so hot outdoors that the computers would be overheating in no time.

    Personally, I would love to be using a fast PPC machine, but the price is just prohibitive... I'd have to be using my current Athlon XP 2000 for years before the electric bill would ammount to the inital price of an equivalently fast PPC system, and that wouldn't be taking into account that the PPC system would still be using up 1/4-1/2 the same ammount of electricity.

    Frankly, I would like to see Laptop computer processors in desktop systems. That would be a decent compromise, that would keep things cool, without having something that is incredibly slow (eg. Via C3).

    (Oh yeah, and: #3. Global warming crap, blah blah blah.)

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  54. Bah, give me Artic Silver and Artic Compound by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    The famouse Artic Silver But I guess thermal paste has it's uses (too.)

  55. Re:Dammit! Not another one! by Hagar129 · · Score: 0

    So you seemly have lots of sun shine, how about solar to help out w/ that increased load?

  56. Ever try one of those Zalman coolers? by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    I got an AMD barton OC'd to 2.2 int. clock and that wonderful heatsink with the big, brushless fan is damn-near silent.

    I think that people don't realize that their power supply may be the noisiest component in their PC! When you start trying to supply 400W from a small enclosure then tend to rachet up the cooling and they can be quite loud compared to a good case fan.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  57. "Little speed boost" is not free by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    It comes as the expense of higher power consumption. Just because we have a better way of dealing with the excess heat doesn't solve the basic problem. It's like saying "I found a way to put an even BIGGER engine in my SUV!" Is that a good thing?

    If we ever needed a revolution in CPU manufacturing and design, now is it. It might be optical, it might be something else, but bring it on.

  58. Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not tell me, that serious research is carried on using MS-WORD?

    I mean, the document did not even display correctly on my Open Office.

  59. Not to be used in that manner... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thermal pastes are thermally conductive, not electrically so. In fact, you want them to be a damned good electrical insulator. If you'd read the article (I did several days ago- [H]ardOCP had coverage of this one earlier this week...) you'd have found out that carbon black, the substance in question, outpaces pretty much everything else (including diamond and nanotube based compounds in development) because it fills the gaps between the heatsink and the chip's heat spreader, etc. with thermally conductive materials better than anything else.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Not to be used in that manner... by guardian-ct · · Score: 1

      Err...

      Some thermal pastes can be electrically conductive, especially older ones containing silver. Arctic Silver 3 is said to be conductive in a thin layer under extreme compression, slightly capacitive, and "might cause problems if it bridges a gap between traces".

  60. Lousy 33%... try 5x! by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Here is a heatsink material that is 2000W/m*K (4.8 times that of silver, 5.1 times of copper). It's a heatpipe-like material, but in sheet form. It would be ideal for laptops, or as the web page says, sushi.

  61. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you geeks brush your teeth with it?

  62. Cool Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'm waiting for Cool Chips. http://www.coolchips.gi/technology/index.shtml

    They apparently devised a method of tunneling electrons across a gap to dissipate heat while preventing the conduction of heat back into the CPU. If it works as well as they say it does, this could be very cool stuff. No pun intended. Can't be that much of a scam since they already have an agreement with Rolls-Royce.

  63. Soot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the soot that builds up on my athlon after a few weeks is a good thing now?

  64. 33 percent is great, but.. by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1


    I'm waiting for the next generation of thermal paste that's spermacidal and fights tooth decay.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  65. Because it costs more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it, you can get 100s of little CPUs per wafer rather than 10s of large ones.

    If you were a company, which would you choose?

  66. but... by tomdarch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like applesauce! (particularly with some true cinnamon - not that cassia stuff!)

  67. They don't want to cover it if you screw up! by Maul · · Score: 1

    This is a plain and simple reason. Even though you can get better results from some third party thermal solutions, it voids your warranty to implement them so they don't have to replace a processor that ate it if YOU screwed up.

    If you follow AMD's recommendations for fans in your box, their included solution is typically sufficient.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  68. mixing silver compound with epoxy by RandyOo · · Score: 1

    you said:
    Find a good 486 heatsink/fan combo, mix a drop of silver compound with a very small drop of epoxy, then mount the sucker on your DSL router's CPU.

    I wonder if you've actually ever tried doing that. I did a few months ago, and the moment I mixed the epoxy and Arctic Silver, the whole thing solidified instantly. Maybe it depends on what kind of epoxy you use? I was using Dubble Bubble...

    1. Re:mixing silver compound with epoxy by jred · · Score: 2, Informative

      I solved that by picking up some Artic Alumina epoxy. That way the epoxy is built in. Worked great on my video card hsf.

      *Note: No research was done, Artic Alumina was what was easily available. I'm sure your favorite brand/flavor has an epoxy version, too.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  69. Processors are only going to get hotter... by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

    It's a sad truth that Moore's Law doesn't say anything about heat.

    The trend of every generation of processors requiring bigger and fancier coolers than the previous generation is not just laziness or incompetence on the part of the designers, as so many slashdotters seem to dismiss it. The fact of the matter is that while we increase the number of transistors and their switching frequency, the amount of heat produced increases faster than it would be reduced by using smaller transistors.

    The death of the constant speed increases in the PC industry may very well be caused by heat before any other factors. Expect to see more and more fancy cooling solutions in the future. In fact, I would predict that water cooling is almost set to go mainstream. That will help for a little while, but the problem remains: If you want to live on the high end, then things are going to be hot.

    --

    Physics is good

  70. Should help for Prescott by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 1

    Intel's next generation of desktop chips supposedly put out 100+ watts of heat. This thermal paste would certainly help to cool that. Since Intel puts thermal speaders on all of thier chips, the extra pressure needed to make the carbon black paste efficient wouldn't crush the core.

    1. Re:Should help for Prescott by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      The current 3ghz + P4 processors actually come with a tube of paste instead of the pad. I don't know what quality that paste is though.

  71. Thermal paste !~ heatsink miracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the thermal paste does not solve much
    of the current problem with the chip generated
    heat transfer process. Actually the limiting
    factor is the thin slice of silicon itself,
    unable to handle the amount of thermal stress
    due to increased power densities. The chip is
    hermitically sealed using ceramic/other electrically non conducting glass/material.So
    there is a thermal gradient because of this.
    After this the heat travels to the surface of
    the metal cap(which is a very good conductor),
    that is then spreadout on to the heat sink with
    the thermal paste providing the interface. Actually not having a perfect area of contact
    does not matter between the chip enclosure and
    the heatsink, because there is hardly any thermal
    gradient between the consequent points on the
    chip metalcap. Apart from this the heat being
    transferred to the heatsink, it also need to be
    effectively carried away(since the heat transfer
    is a function of temperature difference and the
    thermal conductivity). If the existing design
    is overrated(eg. liquid cooling), it could help
    in reducing the temperature a bit. But the limiting factor is not the paste/heat sink, it
    is just the silicon itself(that being the reason
    of happing sos-(silicon on sapphire) and other
    exotic technologies.

  72. Can't help it by Tomster · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Second, the data tables indicate a strong pressure bias - increases in pressure lead to great increases in thermal conductance:"

    I can see it now, overclockers looking for ways to increase the pressure applied to the heatsink/die interface. Here's a future post from an overclocking forum:

    "Hi peeps, I'm trying to put more pressure on my heat sink and need some advice. I've fabricated some titanium supports for the chip socket and motherboard with holes threaded on all four sides for even pressure, and welded supports onto the heat sink. But I'm not sure what setting to use on my torque wrench when I put the bolts on. Here are some pics of my setup (url1, url2, url3). Any thoughts?"

    -Thomas

    1. Re:Can't help it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually pressure on the heatsink, helps in better
      heat conduction by compressing the lattice structure of the molecules in the material, leading to improved thermal conduction. It also
      helps squeeze out the tiny air bubbles, or increase their effective density, increasing thermal conduction again. There is nothing that
      the pressure could get if the heatsink is made an
      integral part of the chip enclosure surface(without any bonding material). But by
      using a cold pressed annealed copper/silver you
      could get slightly better thermal conduction(again
      purity of the material could play a role in this).
      So, ideally, you would like to have an extremely
      thin,extremely conducting(not electrically) film
      on top of the chip surface, that grows out as a
      heat sink(which gain has to be liquid cooled to
      be effective).

  73. Missing an obvous benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The big win with using a better thermal paste is that you can use a quieter fan to cool your CPU, since you don't have to supply as much air to specific spots. (Heat buildup in modern CPUs is quite local and varies with what you actually do). Better thermal conductivity will not do much for total heat dissipation.
    However, reducing fan noise by 3 dB is worth a lot to me.

    1. Re:Missing an obvous benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, the thermal paster does not help in
      the heat recovery process(that a fan does).
      Amount of heat removed is equal to the amount
      of air moved out. You actually do not see the
      localized heating of the cpu chip(because it is
      way down in the layer of silicon), what comes
      to the surface is more or less uniformly spreadout. The thermal paste does not do much
      except to reduce the thermal resistance in the
      heasink/chip cap interface. Still you need a
      big fan, if the heat to be carried out is large
      (as with current cpu's). A good analogy is to
      think of a motor pumping water out from a sump
      to a reservoir above through a pipe. The pipe
      here represents the paste. What use is having
      a thicker pipe, if the toplevel reservoir could
      only be drained slowly(amount of air moved out
      represents the heat that is drained, which is
      proportional to the fan's air moving capacity).
      Hope you understand there is NO OBVIOUS BENEFIT!.

  74. Hazardous material! by entropy_uc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I strongly reccomend that anyone thinking of using this material request an MSDS first.

    We were evaluating some material like this and it turned out to be composed of 30% Class 1 carcinogen. Would you store PCBs in your home?

  75. Re:Dammit! Not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move. Computers shouldn't be used in the desert.

  76. Why do jump to conclusions? by didjit · · Score: 1

    Why is it that whenever something new is created, people immediately assume it will make their computers faster and then a thousand people go to debunk it, saying it will only make a marginal speed increase.

    This technology needs to be tested by other people in order to see if it is legit, as is typical in the scientific community.

    But ... assuming that it does work as well as it claims, consider first the possibility that its most important use might not be in your overclocked, overheated computer. There are a multitude of applications out there where heat transfer is needed and materials of high thermal conductivity are useful. Yes, it might be that this could apply to the semiconductor industry, then again, it might not. But too many people are thinking one-dimensionally.

  77. woooHOOOOOO! by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    that's going to *shred* my render times! thank you! a THREE percent improvement?

    1. Re:woooHOOOOOO! by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      that's going to *shred* my render times! thank you! a THREE percent improvement?

      Taking a hypothetical scenario literally is usually a bad idea. What if that 3.2 Ghz core could get to 3.4Ghz? How about 3.5? Why not 4.0? :) Hey, that's a 25% improvement! Oh WOW, what a MAJOR ADVANCEMENT in CPU technology!!!

      See, I can adjust my scenario as needed to prove my point, because it's all hypothetical. I only meant this scenario as a description of how thermal paste could be beneficial. My words were not to be taken as literal fact. :)

      On the other hand, try pretending for a moment that you're a hard-core gamer looking for a CPU to play Doom III or Half-Life II with... Now does 3% more speed for free look pretty good?

      Of course, better thermal paste wouldn't just benefit the fastest CPUs. A better thermal paste could result in better bin splits. More CPUs would be stable at higher speeds. Can you say "Faster/Cheaper CPUs for everybody"?

    2. Re:woooHOOOOOO! by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      Let me try.

      "Fast...uh...uhm, cheap er Cee-Pee-Ewes for Eve......oh, I give up"

      What if it was 26%? 36%? 97%? Maybe if we squeeze it on *reeeeal sloooow* we'll get a perpetual motion machine!

  78. That depends on whether you're going... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    ...to actually USE the wax thermal compound with the heat sink. If you're going to be using a "super" thermal grease (such as Arctic Silver and it's ilk), you DON'T want to use that pad at all- it interferes with the proper operation of the thermal grease because the wax-like compound of the thermal pad embeds itself into the cracks, etc. on the heatsink and contact pad of the CPU and acts more like a thermal insulator compared to the grease. Basically speaking, if there's a pad on your heat sink, you're going to want to scrape off that pad and lap the sink before using it with the thermal grease. That's why most of the high-end sink manufacturers quit putting the wax pads on the sinks- people weren't using it and it wasn't nearly as good as the top of the line white grease, let alone something like Arctic Silver.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  79. Thermal paste doesn't cool your processor by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    It just transfers the heat to the heat sink. You'll still need a massive heatsink and massive fan to pull the heat away from the heatsink into the air. And then you have to deal with all that heat lingering inside your case so you'll need a way to get it out of there along with the heat from the powersupply, chipset, ram, video and sound cards.

    Better pastes is good, but shouldn't they also be trying to increase performance while also decreasing power requirements?

  80. Who cares about Thermal Transfer? by eclectus · · Score: 1

    The big question is how does this stuff taste?

    --
    This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    1. Re:Who cares about Thermal Transfer? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      ...and will it help this guy?

  81. Uh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel so completely gave up on the concept of being able to cool their highly-clocked - over-clocked if you ask me - chips that they designed in a feature to slow down/turn off sections of the chip in order to lower temperatures...

    It seems on one hand you think Intel chips run too hot, and on the other hand you dislike a feature that helps them to keep cool. Isn't that a bit... odd?

    In fact, the PIV will automatically underclock itself if to keep its temperature in spec, so if you're content with slower performance, no fan - in fact, no heatsink - is required. (Although it's not just a little slower, it's a LOT slower.) How's that for running cool? There was a fun video of this feature in action at Tom's Hardware some time ago.

  82. "Little speed boost" is not free-Spread 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't really need to do that. It would be better if we had multiple chips all working like a mega-processor. The individual processors wouldn't be stressed so much, and the thermal load would be easier to remove because it's spread out over a wider area. It would also scale a bit easier for both power, and economic conditions. BTW Going photonic wouldn't get rid of heat being generated, because heat can be caused by both electrons and photons slamming against atoms. Having a material that offers less resistance would help (gallium arsenide, gold). Using less electrons to accomplish the work (lowering the voltage, and current), while staying above the thermal noise floor (this is why supercooling helps) to ensure reliability (being able to tell your "1"'s from your "0"'s helps).

  83. Will the OC crowd pay extra for this stuff? by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
    How hard is it to make this stuff?

    So, the mad overclocker buys a tube of Dow #111 and a bottle of Darko. Spends a little time with a popsicle stick and a film canister and viola! Carbon black heat sink compound.

    If you're already hacking your hardware for faster clock speeds, what's to keep you from rolling your own heatsink compound?

    I mean aside from the fact that your wife will kill you when she sees black fingerprints all over every surface in the house.

    Are overclockers "audiophiles", buying anodized billet aircraft aluminum volume knobs? Or are you folks hobbyists, shopping mainly in Nuts & Volts?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  84. I have a question... by dargaud · · Score: 1

    what are the fastest fan-less CPUs on the market ? Anything above 1Gz that can go with only a heatsink and no fans like old 486s ?

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:I have a question... by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      Check out Via's processors - x86 compatible stuff designed for low power consumption, particularly the Eden and C3.

  85. thermal paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Its great on a BLT keeps the hot side hot and the cold side cold.

  86. This paste works for CPU cooling by dwanetwain · · Score: 1

    I read the oringinal article by Leong & Chung and made some paste based on their optimal recomendations. I replaced the Arctic Silver on my Athlon XP 2000 with this and saw my CPU idle temperature drop from 45C to 32C!!. The ambient room temp was identical in both cases. Fortunately I work in a lab - but maybe I should go into business.

    1. Re:This paste works for CPU cooling by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      What's the recipe?
      Please include suppliers, manufacturers and product numbers.
      Inquiring minds want to know!


      Thanks

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    2. Re:This paste works for CPU cooling by dwanetwain · · Score: 1

      The link to the original paper is in the slashdot article (http://zzz.com.ru/chung.zip). This paper contains all the details and suppliers. I used the butyl-ether-based paste, best for 75C and below. This contains 40 vol.% dissolved ethyl cellulose and dispersed carbon black in the optimum amount of 0.20 vol.%. I used a mortar and pestal to mix the ingredients for about 20 minutes. Then I just let it stand covered in a cool place over night to let the bubbles rise out. I ended up making a cupful of the stuff fairly cheaply. http://zzz.com.ru/chung.zip

  87. Re:Dammit! Not another one! by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, more sun than 99% of people can phsycially stand. (You know you live in a desert when your local news has a body-count of people that died from the heat).

    I've thought about Solar, and may very well choose to go that route, but it's really only helps with a part of the problem, and it's still only hiding the problem for a while...

    The more power you draw, the bigger of a solar system you need... The more often you will have to replace your solar equipment (batteries, inverter, etc). And it still doesn't solve the problem... I'm still spending quite a bit on power just for the computer, just in one big lump sum, rather than monthly.

    Besides, that wouldn't help with the heat problem at all.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  88. Thinned die by snoochyboochy · · Score: 1
    Most heat sensitive devices are background (the backside of the wafer is gound off to remove material/make the die thinner) to aid in heat transfer- silicon is not the best material for transferring heat away from the active region of the die.

    As for thickness, I would not recommend thinning the die any further than the manufacturer already does- most CPUs (see any Athlon) are in a flip chip package- the front side of the die is bonded to the package. This bonding builds up a bunch of mechanical stress in the part, thinning it after bonding without professional tools is a sure way to crack the die.

    1. Re:Thinned die by cheese_wallet · · Score: 0

      This bonding builds up a bunch of mechanical stress in the part, thinning it after bonding without professional tools is a sure way to crack the die.

      That's a pretty good point...I hadn't considered that the die could be under tension from the mounting.

      I'm going to upgrade before too long, so I may take my old cpu and lap it down to see what results I get (p3 1ghz). I'll probably pot it with epoxy so when I'm grinding it the sides won't chip off.

  89. Re:Dammit! Not another one! by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for the world, hot areas make up a huge portion of the world. Maybe not desert temperatures, but just about everywhere gets near 100F for a few weeks of the year. Should everyone stop using computers?

    Computers just need to be better designed.

    Besides, my notebook works perfectly even in 120F heat. Unfortunately, it isn't feasable to use a notebook with a TV-tuner card, 200GB hard drive, TV-out, and remote control. It would be a waste of money since it doesn't need to be light or compact, and doesn't need an LCD, touch-pad, battery, etc. And $1,000+ is just too much money for a base system.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  90. You Don't "Get It" by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

    Someone always points out that it'd be better to do "X" vice "Y". Sure, I could spend $20 and get the next faster CPU so I don't have to overclock. The thing is, I don't have to overclock at all. I just like to.

    I spent a few days lapping my heatsinks. It was fun. After a few hours of trying to get a perfect surface, it became a Zen-like experience. Repetitive motion and extreme focus brought on a uphoria that really left me feeling better than a mere "few degrees" would show. Same with rounded cables and lighted fans. I do it cuz working inside my PC is fun.

    As to manufacturers making cooler CPUs, I think thay try for that in the laptop market, but gamers and Gentoo users are interested in raw speed at any cost. Heat is one of those costs. Noise is another.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  91. Dammit! Not another one!-Thermal shock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well like you said. You live in a desert, so you should be familiar with all the things that go into surviving in the desert. Thick adobe walled houses. Evaporative coolers. Storing "cool" during the nightime (most people aren't aware how cool nightime gets). As for solar, it doesn't have to be solar cells, but something as simple as a solar pond, like what's used in Israel[1]. You're a geek, I'm certain you could think of quite a few ways to handle that computer.

    [1] Throw in a stirling engine generator, or this

    1. Re:Dammit! Not another one!-Thermal shock. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      you should be familiar with all the things that go into surviving in the desert.

      Indeed, but never before has anyone had to deal with living in a desert, AND being forced to have a high-power space-heater running all day... It just screws up everything.

      Evaporative coolers.

      Which is what I'm using now... But being forced to leave a swamp cooler running 18 hours every day isn't exactly the ideal solution.

      You're a geek, I'm certain you could think of quite a few ways to handle that computer.

      Yes, I'm working on it, but it is certainly irritating that nobody has yet come up with a solution, as if, like another poster said, computers aren't supposed to be used in the desert, and computer companies are perfectly happy with the fact the last generation was very hot, and this generation runs dangerously hot.

      What bothers me most is that everything was perfect without this computer, and now I basically have to change my whole life around this thing, just because manufacturers don't mind heat...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  92. Pyro aluminum in ethyl chloride slurry? by rkinch · · Score: 1

    Anyone looked at a slurry of pyrotechnic aluminum in ethyl chloride? Very small metal particles, the liquid could boil off as you settle the surfaces together.

  93. THE OFFICIAL TACO-SNOTTING FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By J. Wipo Troll, Esq., $Revision: 1.16 $

    [This article attempts to document a vile, ungodly practice that runs rampant through the homosexual geek and hacker community, a practice known as Taco-snotting, or simply snotting. Taco-snotting is something that few geeks dare talk about in free or open conversation, but it is nonetheless a widely-practiced and dangerous form of homosexuality. If you or anyone you know has ever engaged in Taco-snotting, please get professional help before it is too late. ed.]

    Why do I keep receiving emails from an individual calling himself CmdrTaco?

    You have been receiving unsolicited mailings from a certain Robert CmdrTaco Malda, owner of the popular technology website slashdot.org. Actually, its not a very popular site in the common sense of the word; the site is rife with pimply, antisocial geeks and hackers, zit-faced nerds, communists, dirty GNU hippies, and other societal rejects and outcasts. Its also home to one of the worlds largest suspected pdophile rings, the infamous Slashdot crew.

    Whenever Mr. Malda gets bored (and who wouldnt, running a site like Slashdot all day), he roams through the user database, penis in hand, looking for people who might enjoy engaging in homosexual activities with him. How he determines this is anyones guess; but if you have a homosexual-sounding nickname, or a nick with a letter of the English alphabet in it, youre a potential candidate.

    This time, he found you. Lucky you.

    Mr. Malda seems to be speaking in some sort of code. Do you know what it means?

    CmdrTacos code language is relatively easy to decipher. This pervert prefers to speak in thinly-veiled sexual innuendo (yes, thats right: he wants you) to evade the watchful eye of Slashdots parent corporation, VA Software. Mr. Maldas Commander is, of course, his penis: a small, withered little thing that lives in his pants and only comes out in the presence of other male geeks or at the beck and call of Maldas own lubed-up right hand. His Taco bells are the shriveled testicles that droop beneath his Commander, and his Taco sauce is his thin, runny semen. It should be more than obvious to you now what he means if he asked you to ring his Taco bells or taste his gourmet Taco sauce.

    I would also guess CmdrTaco asked you to engage in a practice known as Taco-snotting and, if he was in a particularly depraved mood at the time, a circle-snot.

    Good Lord. And, yes, he did. What is Taco-snotting?

    Taco-snotting is the term used by Robert Malda to refer to the depraved act of fellating another man (homo- or heterosexual; CmdrTaco is rumoured to prefer raping unwilling victims), then blowing the semen out his nose and back onto the face and body of his victim. Naturally, a long, bubbly stream of milky-white semen is left on CmdrTacos face, dribbling out of his nose and down his cheek: hence the term, Taco-snotting.

    And if thats not bad enough

    A circle-snot is a Taco-snotting circle-jerk, another practice common among the Slashdot crew. CmdrTaco, CowboiKneel, and Homos get together and snot each other with their gooey, sticky cum spooging their jizz-snot all over each others faces and pasty, white bodies, until theyre covered head to toe with their own and each others man juice. This vile, ungodly ritual can go on for hours. For the homosexual penetration that follows this lengthy foreplay, Roblowme is usually there to provide plenty of anal lubricant; he owns a limousine service and has ample supplies of motor oil and axle grease ready to go.

    To complete this perverted orgy, fellow faggots Michael, Timothy, and Jamie will usually join in, dressed in tight leather mock-S.S. uniforms, jack boots, and leather gloves. The homosexual shenanigans that follow are nearly beyond description. The whole group begins to snot each others spunk and whip each others pudgy asses with riding crops and chains until their pale, white geek bodies are exhausted and soaked in stinking sw