Slashdot Mirror


Hotel Being Sued for Using the Dewey Decimal System

cbull writes "Did you know the Dewey Decimal System isn't in the public domain? The rights are owned by the Online Computer Library Center. They are suing the Library Hotel in New York for trademark infringement. In addition, according to the article, libraries pay at least $500/year to use the system."

419 comments

  1. well damn! by flyneye · · Score: 2, Funny

    i would like to copyright all the prime numbers.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:well damn! by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1, Funny

      Too late, I've already patented all numbers ( in all bases including binary) and all counting systems. All your bits are belong to me.

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    2. Re:well damn! by Frobnicator · · Score: 1, Redundant
      i would like to copyright all the prime numbers.

      I never knew so many /. posters were so ignorant of trademark, service marks, patants, and copyright distinctions. You cannot copyright such a thing. At best, you could get a patant on a method of finding prime numbers. OCLC's law suit is the right action for them to take, if you understand the way the laws work.

      • Trademark & service marks = ownership of a particular mark for a particular usage in a particular domain which can be renewed as long as the mark is in use, to prevent a group's name from being tarnished by shoddy companies.
      • Patants = limited monopolies on the use of a method, to ensure that inventors have time to transform ideas into marketable (and profitable) products.
      • Copyrights = (supposedly) limited term restrictions on reproduction of any recorded information, to allow authors and artists to collect royalties.

      They can claim trademark violations because the hotel is using the marks owned by OCLC without permission. It would be like some no-name snack company naming their products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs". Now I'm off to paste this to all the others who don't bother to understand the law before spouting off about how bad it is.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    3. Re:well damn! by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 2, Funny

      These "patants" you speak of sound suspiciously similar to "patents". I wonder if that could be a trademark violation, like selling a "Rolax" instead of "Rolex".

    4. Re:well damn! by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Right. Now it's a shame that somebody has a patent on spell checkers in web browsers, preventing me from easily spell-chekcing my posts. :-)

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    5. Re:well damn! by Illbay · · Score: 1

      Even with the advent of Google, I have as yet been unable to discover who the hell "Dewey Decimal" was.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    6. Re:well damn! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      get slack granpa,the comment (first post see above) was made in parody of the situation.
      damn did someone take out your humor gland?
      see link below for further instructions.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    7. Re:well damn! by donbrock · · Score: 1

      He's the brother of Huey and Louie.

  2. This could be good by Ryosen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just one more reason to do away with an antiquated filing system.

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    1. Re:This could be good by ahfoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No doubt. The DDC is such a pain in the ass when you're used to LOC. I am also suprised to find tht it's still being licensed. I thought the only people still using it were in countries that didn't want to submit to LOC guidelines because their own copyright laws were uhm, different.
      I know that's the case here in Taiwan. I was shocked to find major research universities using DDC and then when I began working with a publisher I learned that it had a lot to do with copyright and the LOC. In fact, I taught classes on using the LOC at one point for students preparing to go overseas.
      But personally I find the DDC obnoxious and far more of an obstacle to research than a helpful classification system.

    2. Re:This could be good by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      What's the 'copyright problem' you refer to with LOC? From the sound of things it couldn't be any worse than Dewey.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Both Dewey and Library of Congress are "divide and conquer" stratergies - that is, you split the search space into smaller and smaller chunks until you find what you're looking for.

      This is an acceptable solution when you're searching on paper or your search sapce isn't that large, but today we have computers and far more data.

      For example, "Algorithms in C" is a classic text a lot of people here probably own.

      But does it belong under "math", "computer science", or "computer languages -> C"? (Dewey seperates Computing out into a seperate category, rather than placing it under math).

      The answer, of course, is all three.

      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue. But until we can do that, keywords and searchable abstracts are more useful than categories. Just put the damn books on the shelf in order of author.

    4. Re:This could be good by TWX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never liked LOC, but I was taught Dewey. I could walk into a Dewey library that was properly signed (by number range) and find anything that I wanted, without having to consult the catalog. When I got to college, I had to deal with the college having three libraries, with different segments being in different buildings (ie, science library, law library) without being labelled as such in the catalog, only to get up and over to the section in the main library where the segment would be in order, to find a sign saying that those books were in the other building.

      Needless to say, this implementation gave me a particular distain for LOC, and even if it is a better system, I don't think that I'll ever like it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:This could be good by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Melvil Dewey created the most widely used library classification system in 1873" 130 years ago!? The fact that anyone 'owns' the rights to it is plain ridiculous.

    6. Re:This could be good by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Libraries are already strapped for cash--until an automated book retrieval system is developed, then the only way to fully implement your system would be to insert three copies into the stacks.

      Sometimes, libraries do place faux books on the shelf with instructions to the browser to "also consult this CDROM" but stacks loaded with these faux books would not be particularly easy to browse.

      My ideal library would let browsers borrow hand held electronic catalogues-- so that flashes of insight wouldn't need to be followed by a long trek back to the catalogs in the lobby.

    7. Re:This could be good by ahfoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's simple really. You're not supposed to just make up LOC numbers for you local archive out of thin air. If you've got a new title, you have to submit your title to the LOC. But if your book is largely a collection of "borrowed" material being reprinted without authorization, that's obviously not going to be your first choice.
      Things really have changed with the IP nazis on everybody's ass these days, but once upon a time there was a large market in reprinting expensive foreign titles and even making custom bound compilations. See the problem? Where are you going to file that?

    8. Re:This could be good by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue.

      You make a very good point that a hierarchical system isn't suitable for cataloging. I have the same problem with my more than 6000 (all legally acquired) MP3s: Artists span Genres, Albums contain works by more than one Composer, Artists may appear in more than one Group/Band/Orchestra, etc.

      But free-text search isn't a great solution; we've all seen that with Google: I can find web pages about Apple MacIntosh and I can find pages about growing Apple MacIntoshes, but it's hard to separate the pages about computers from those about cookery.

      In these cases, an abstract is more useful than a full-text search.

    9. Re:This could be good by op00to · · Score: 1

      +computer -tree -orchard +mouse .. c'mon, google isn't rocket science.

    10. Re:This could be good by friedo · · Score: 1
      No, it isn't. Dewey is updated constantly and a new catalog is published annually. That takes a lot of work and money to create, and the system retains its IP protection.


      If you wanted to, you could use the 100 year old version with impunity, however.

    11. Re:This could be good by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      So called intellectual property laws defeat the very purpose of communication. They are an abomination, and should be abolished.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    12. Re:This could be good by Zoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue.

      No, no, no, no.

      What is needed is that PLUS exactly what you hinted at: faceted classification.

      Books can be arranged on the shelves by author or FILO or whatever, but they should be, in the age of computers, indexed by multiple heirarchical facets.

      Keywords and free-text searches are far too unreliable, even in the age of Google. If you're doing serious research, you can't rely on the first Google hit, you need to try several different methods. In fact, Google's methodology, ranking by weighted hyperlink popularity, wouldn't apply to books.

      What you need are a combination of faceted classification (like the subject entries in the cataloging software most libraries use) and free-text as well as abstract searching. Quite frankly, humans and the software they write are too stupid to classify everything well enough to use one system or another exclusively.

    13. Re:This could be good by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>+computer -tree -orchard +mouse .. c'mon, google isn't rocket science.

      Yes, from a user's point of view. But just think about the implementation that makes those easy searches possible.

      Pretty impressive eh? Not exactly rocket science, but pretty darned close.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    14. Re:This could be good by TomV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Free-text is a useful adjunct for testing relevance of your initial hits, but it's not a sound basis for a classification as such. The difficulty with Free Text is the lack / impossibility of a proper Thesaurus (in the librarian's sense of the word, a graph of authoritative terms, their synonyms *and* their relationships). Personally I'd like an underlying Faceted classification (fundamentally bottom-up rather than top-down / hierarchical), and then some controlled-vocabulary descriptors, plus othe indicators and maybe free-text as the icing on the cake. The trouble with getting Free Text to do all the work is that before you can do that, you just need to get the Universal Natural Language Parser sorted out to look after the semantics.

      The trouble with schemes like DDC or LOC is that you have to create a category *before* you can assign an item to that category. The first faceted scheme, Ranganathan's Colon classification , marked every item with five, colon-delimited facets, in the form personality:matter:energy:space:time, but most modern faceted schemes are a little less philosophical about it. If you need a new description within a facet, you're free to create one.

      The only time I ever had to build a specialist class scheme for a library I was restructuring, I went faceted - DDC or LOC would have been quick and easy but wouldn't have reflected the ways my particular customers were likely to want to approach the information I was providing.

      Not really useful as a shelving guide in a general-purpose library, but as a class scheme per se, faceted is lovely.

      TomV

    15. Re:This could be good by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      I can find web pages about Apple MacIntosh and I can find pages about growing Apple MacIntoshes, but it's hard to separate the pages about computers from those about cookery.

      Have you tried adding the words "computer" or "fruit" to your query? ;-)

    16. Re:This could be good by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      But does it belong under "math", "computer science", or "computer languages -> C"?[...]

      The answer, of course, is all three.

      That's fine for the catalog, but what about the shelves? You can't expect the library to buy three copies so they can put it on all three places?

    17. Re:This could be good by gnalle · · Score: 1

      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue. But until we can do that, keywords and searchable abstracts are more useful than categories. Just put the damn books on the shelf in order of author


      Where I come from most libraries have a free text search system for finding the books, and I guess that your local library has it too.


      But they still need a system for placing the books on the shelves. This is where Dewey comes in handy.

    18. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, grasshopper. You truly grok the google.

    19. Re:This could be good by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yah. But if you are a libary and your users prefer google, just put info on all your books on a webserver and let google do all that rocket science.

      You can still keep the old systems.
      And you can extend it.

      --
    20. Re:This could be good by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can find web pages about Apple MacIntosh and I can find pages about growing Apple MacIntoshes, but it's hard to separate the pages about computers from those about cookery.

      Have you tried adding the words "computer" or "fruit" to your query? ;-)

      But that's precisely my point: only the most pedantic writer is going to qualify which sort of apple he's talking about, because he'll expect his reader to pick it up from context.

      Consider: the author won't write:
      I compiled the program on my Apple McIntosh (a computer)
      and he won't write a recipe specifying:
      Recipe: 1/2 pound thinly sliced apples (the fruit)


      The reader is expected, in anything other than a children's book, to figure out that "compile" and "program" make the Apple unambiguosly a computer; likewise the heading "Recipe" and "thinly sliced" clue in the reader that we expect him to slice fruits, not silicon.

      But the universe of possible context clues is far too big to specify everytime I want to do a full-text search: "compile", and "program" indicate a computer, but so would "IRC", "firewall" and "slashdot", and the list goes on and on. Unless adding the word "computer" also implicity adds the thousands of context clues that tell the reader an Apple computer, not a red fruit, is being written about, a full-text search isn't as helpful as you might guess.
    21. Re:This could be good by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Strongly agreed. Keywords and author indexing are more useful simply because they don't resort to reductionism; with the reductionistic DDS and LOC methods a book only ends up in one category when it fits multiple.

    22. Re:This could be good by TomV · · Score: 1

      You are a fellow librarian and I claim my 5 quid :-)

      Normal people just don't talk about faceted classifications, and some of them haven't heard of Ranganathan at all. Kids today, I ask you...

      tomV

    23. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue

      That's the way the libraries in Las Vegas are set up. Of course they have the DDC too, but I doubt many people use it.

    24. Re:This could be good by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      "I can find web pages about Apple MacIntosh and I can find pages about growing Apple MacIntoshes, but it's hard to separate the pages about computers from those about cookery."

      Have you tried adding the words "computer" or "fruit" to your query? ;-)

      Interestingly enough... from Friday's NYT crossword puzzle:

      Apples, but not IBMs (5 letters)

      -a

    25. Re:This could be good by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      I disagree on your theory that the ideal library system would be a free-text search.

      A search engine, no matter how good it is, is no a replacement for a good index. I'm an attorney, and I've been dealing with Lexis for a few years. Maybe I'm not good enough at Lexis, but in my experience it's a pain in the neck. It's almost impossible to look up a statute on say, "intestate succession" without getting 100+ hits on statutes from almost every code in the State of California.

      Search engines have their places - and a free-text library catalog search is a very good idea. But it should be viewed as an adjunct to an index and cataloging system and not as a replacement.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    26. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you place one book on multiple bookshelves?

    27. Re:This could be good by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can find web pages about Apple MacIntosh and I can find pages about growing Apple MacIntoshes, but it's hard to separate the pages about computers from those about cookery.

      Well, actually, I don't think it should be a problem in this case - the fruit is spelled McIntosh (no "a," both "M" and "I" capitalized). Of course you might still get pages about the computer intermingled with ones about raincoats (and none of this will be of much use to someone with the kind of free-and-easy, nonconformist approach to spelling frequently exhibited on Slashdot ;) )...

    28. Re:This could be good by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      the key to full text searches is taking advantage of the very mechanism you just made an example out of. Compile is unlikely to be used in a text speaking of a dish (we compiled all the components together into a 12 inch pie pan)... uhmm no. However, it has a semi-high relevance of appearing in a computer article, no? Taking note of the differences in rhetoric / articulation when speaking of two different abstract concepts is critical to effectively using a search engine when a term can be ambiguous (and most can be).

    29. Re:This could be good by parasite · · Score: 0


      By AUTHOR ?! That would make library browsing
      hell. How do you think I find cool new books
      about Asian history, Philosophy, and Linux ?
      I have the positions of where all those shelves
      are located memorized, and then I can go browse
      the sides of the books for titles I've not seen
      before or that look timely and relevant to
      something I just got into...

      Do you REALLY know the TITLE of the book you
      want EVERY TIME ?! How many books exist that you
      will never know of if you only go to something
      you can "name".

    30. Re:This could be good by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google's methodology, ranking by weighted hyperlink popularity, wouldn't apply to books.

      Actually, it could. But instead of hyperlinks, it would use references/bibliographies. So if my book takes a quote from your book, that would have the same effect as a hyperlink on a website.

      Then, the most-quoted books would get the highest search results. If everybody is talking about your book, it could just be the one you're looking for :)

    31. Re:This could be good by dtobias · · Score: 1

      "..use the 100 year old version..." seems basically to be what the hotel in question is doing. They have a thematic system for labeling their floors and rooms that is based loosely on the broad Dewey categories, rather than a highly specific categorization system that would require reference to recent updates. I would classify what they're doing as a derivative work based on the (now public domain) original Dewey system of the 1800s.

      However, they're being sued for trademark infringement, not copyright infringement; the hotel could probably avoid this suit by not actually using the name "Dewey" anywhere in their description, as trademarks protect names rather than the content of the numbering system itself.

      --
      --Dan
      Web Tips
    32. Re:This could be good by danila · · Score: 1

      The good thing about cataloguing and searching books is that they are relatively well structured. You can't really talk about abstracts for web-pages, can you? :) Web-pages vary from books to news articles, from thumbnail galleries to MP3 linklists, from online-shop sections to net-art, from forum messages to pop-up ads. Catalogues won't work very well for 100% of pages, until we have somewhat capable AI, that's why we have to rely on full-text search. With books you can have the best of both worlds - search tools that would automatically take into account the context of your full-text search and also provide you text snippets, tables of contents and abstracts when you browse the catalogue.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    33. Re:This could be good by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      You don't. Like I, and the dude or dudette to whom I responded, said, you just alphabetize the books and use keywords in a database (and/or card catalog) for lookup when the name of the author is not known. While this would be no doubt more difficult on those looking for multiple books (or comparing) on one subject, it is still superior to having misplaced books.

    34. Re:This could be good by kotj.mf · · Score: 3, Informative
      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue. But until we can do that, keywords and searchable abstracts are more useful than categories. Just put the damn books on the shelf in order of author.

      I worked as a reference assistant at a large urban public library for 5+ years, and in my experience, less than half of the people who came in were doing research via the catalog. Most of them were simply browsing by subject. 99% of the time, it was faster and easier to simply point them to the spot on the shelves where a particular subject number was.

      I mean, we were five floors covering an entire city block... would you really want to have to walk from one extreme of the building to grab Linux Apache Web Server Administration by Charles Aulds to the other end to get Matt Welsh's Running Linux? In my library, I could just point to to a single shelf with the 005's.

      Shelving by author is fine, barely, for fiction, where a lot people tend to read every book by a particular author. Even then, a lot of large libraries tend to split stuff up by genre much like your local bookstore. But for nonfiction, organizing by subject for browsing and casual research is the only way to go.

      As for Dewey vs. LC, well, that's up there with vi and Emacs. LC works well for academic libraries where there's a hell of a lot more in-depth research going on, while Dewey works best for public libraries. I find Dewey more intuitive, but that's probably because I know it best. In research institutions, where most patrons have the time to spend a half hour in front of a catalog session, LC seems to fit the bill. YMMV, natch.

      --
      hang brain.
    35. Re:This could be good by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always though that simple sets would be the way to go. You create categories (as needed), and then assign books to as many or as few categories as are needed. A variation of this is weighted sets, where "membership" has a weighting factor between 0 and 1.

      I have a few more details on these at:

      http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/sets1.htm

    36. Re:This could be good by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue. But until we can do that, keywords and searchable abstracts are more useful than categories. Just put the damn books on the shelf in order of author.

      I rather strongly disagree. I've found many excellent books just by browsing near books on the same or similar subjects. With non-fiction, the subject is usually what you're primarily interested in rather than the author.

      You have to shelve books in one and only one place, so I vote for subject, imperfect though it often is. Having a good online catalogue is vital too, but can't replace actually looking at the shelves.

      Fiction is a whole other problem. It used to be (where I lived anyway) that libraries divided fiction up by genre then author, so I could head to the SF or historical or crime shelf as the mood took me and look for new stuff. Later it became somehow politically incorrect to categorise fiction, so they all went into the same big pile, ordered by author. Thus readers lost the ability to find new authors in whatever genre turned you on by just browsing.

    37. Re:This could be good by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [blink] How did this outfit come to own the DDC?

      Not that making the DDC too expensive to use would be a bad thing!! After getting used to the LOC system in college, going back to the DDC (what the Los Angeles County so-called Library uses) is like being blind, deaf, illiterate, and lost. Yeah, there's more to remember with the LOC, but -- put it this way, once I'd learned HOW to use the LOC, it let me pinpoint the location of literally any subject or even individual book; despite its complexity, everything follows logically. The DDC is too coarse-grained for that; at best you can usually get into the immediate neighbourhood -- but then there are those sections where a book's DDC location is at best arbitrary (like the overlap/conflict between the "animals" and "nature science" sections in .. um, 599 and 626, IIRC.)

      IMO the only valid reason for the DDC's continued existence is because it's easier for grade schoolers to learn to use, since most humans naturally do well at remembering and associating sets of three digits, and it's hard enough to get children accustomed to using the library. But there's no sane excuse for inflicting the DDC on major library systems!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    38. Re:This could be good by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      One thing you'll notice is that all libraries seem to catogorize things differently. My father (who is a real certified librarian) says this is because its ultimately up to the librarian where they are classified. A good example of this is Michael Moore's books - love or hate him - his books seem to be in political commentary or satire, or commedy depending on the library. Personally I would put them in political commentary, but some people might find them funny (and they are) and put them in with the commedy books.

      One of the reasons why local libraries and most K-12 public schools use the dewey decimle system is because lc is overkill for the volume of books these groups typically have.

      As far as free text searching most modern library index's can actually index books using all three - dds, lc, and free keyword search using computers. But remember that lc and dewey originate on cards which have to be hand searched.

      Dewey and LC also help place the books on the shelf - ie where is the book physically? With dewey if its 500 you just go down the row of books until you get that number or series of numbers. You know when you find a book on one topic you can find a book on a similar topic nearby. This is something free-text searching doesn't define really - and the biggest difference between search engines on the internet and search engines at the local library.

    39. Re:This could be good by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

      Libraries are already strapped for cash--until an automated book retrieval system is developed, then the only way to fully implement your system would be to insert three copies into the stacks.

      You're thinking too hard. The search system would simply refer the library patron to the physical location of the book, regardless of what search terms or categories it was found under.

    40. Re:This could be good by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1
      Devoutly seconded.

      I used to be not-a-geek. I was browsing my library's selection of humor books (nonfiction), and my eye was caught by the word "hacker" on a big yellow book nearby. One of my friends was a hacker... what was it all about, anyway?

      I wound up checking out and reading the dead-tree version of the Jargon File, cover-to-cover. Despite knowing how to use computers, and despite my father's being a programmer, that was what got me interested in computers, because I realized that computers were what People Like Me were interested in. Without having read that, I wouldn't have taken that programming class in high school...

      I'm now headed after my first bachelor's degree in computer information systems.




      Also, there's very little substitute for being able to open all the interesting-looking books in a subject and skim the table of contents and index, as well as flip through the pages. So an Ideal Library System would have ToC and Index searchable as well...

    41. Re:This could be good by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1

      All bets are off when a geek has written the recipe. "Hold on, let me compile a shopping list!" is a common phrase in this household.

    42. Re:This could be good by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • You're thinking too hard. The search system would simply refer the library patron to the physical location of the book, regardless of what search terms or categories it was found under.


      *Bangs head on wall*

      Been to a library lately?

      WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK THEY ARE DOING??

      Key is, they have to have SOME method for choosing which books go where on the shelf, so mine as well use a preexisting system that is already mapped out. Does it matter if the mappings are a little strange some times? No, because we have computers to sort it all out for us!
    43. Re:This could be good by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Hmm,

      Hierarchical shelving?

      Logical--->Math--->Computer Science--->Computer Languages?

      Of course as soon as you run across an "Arts of Mathematics" book you are screwed as to figuring out where to put it. . . .

    44. Re:This could be good by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      You aren't one of those nasty persons who believes that "open stacks" are unnecessary, are you?

    45. Re:This could be good by davesag · · Score: 1

      well just to try it out, i did a google for "cooking with macintosh apples" and got many very appropriate responses. then i tried a google for "cooking with an apple macintosh" and also got appropriate respponses. google works. hooray. so let's try a google for "apple macintosh growing" yep, that's about right, and "growing macintosh apples", not bad either.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    46. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      // >> Yes, from a user's point of view. But just think about the implementation that makes those easy searches possible.

      // Ok, lets try it.

      List list1, list2;
      list1 = List.ALL;
      list1 = list1.filter("computer");
      list2 = list1.filter("tree");
      list1 = list1.subtract(list2);
      list1 = list2.filter("orchard");
      list1 = list1.subtract(list2);
      list1 = list1.filter("mouse");

      result = list1;

      // sheeit, that was easy.

    47. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a very good point that a hierarchical system isn't suitable for cataloging. I have the same problem with my more than 6000 (all legally acquired) MP3s: Artists span Genres, Albums contain works by more than one Composer, Artists may appear in more than one Group/Band/Orchestra, etc.

      I usually do: band/album/band - track no. - song title.mp3

      Where "band" might include different individuals + groups, for example "sting + the police" or "lou reed + the velvet underground" or "john lennon + the beatles".

      Band is repeated twice (one in the folder, one in the filename) in case it gets moved to a different directory.

    48. Re:This could be good by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Any decent computerized cataloging system will have location codes that tell you which building (and often on which floor) a given title is on.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    49. Re:This could be good by frisket · · Score: 1
      The problem with LOC is that it's useless for those areas that were never defined (eg anything to do with computing). DDC has its faults but users find it vastly easier to understand.

      The big problem with OCLC is lack of responsiveness. I wanted to use DDC in the Acronym Server but despite me mailing them three times, they never responded, which is either ignorance, stupidity, or just plain rudeness.

    50. Re:This could be good by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      only to get up and over to the section in the main library where the segment would be in order, to find a sign saying that those books were in the other building

      There's something like that going on in the public libraries here... they use Dewey(tm) but they've chopped up the sequences. I think the theory is that they're collecting things that "go together" even though they're in different parts. There's an Arts & Music section on one floor, with the relevant section(s) of the Dewey system, plus all the rental videos, music, and art. There's a "business" section on another floor, which has a rather more choppy bits of Dewey(tm), all the references, magazines, etc. It's nice for browsing, but not quite as convenient for finding stuff you've looked up in the catalog (which at least notes which "special collection" books are in, in addition to the Dewey(tm) number).

      What I really wish, though, is that *bookstores* would use one system or the other.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    51. Re:This could be good by Scooter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more - I mean come on guys - you can't copyright/patent counting. I don't claim to be an expert on the DD indexing "system" but I just read the "introduction" pdf and it seems to me to be a simple hierachical identifier, a lot like er.. IP addressing... And in what way is it "decimal" anyway? because it has "."'s between the numbers?!? Give it up guys. Here's Scooters semi-colon numbering system: you define a whole bunch of top level categories, and then some sub categories, and then some sub-sub-categories, and when you get bored of adding tiers, number the books. Write them down as a;b;c;d;....n. Great - now if any of you tea leafs start numbering things like that - I'll see you in court! :P

      I mean in this day and age surely some sort of tree structure would be better (and be easier to manipulate by machines). Each book has n number of attributes where n is bigger than 0. You can go on adding nodes of type attribute until the book is described uniqely. Or dammit - just index them by the ISBN and chuck in a whole bunch of keywords to search by..

      In other news, the estate of one Pythagoras is suing everyone for making the square of the hypotenuse on their triangles equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides - the thieving swines! Pop-Idol on BBC2 next, after the weather.

    52. Re:This could be good by refactored · · Score: 1
      The ideal system would be a free-text search of all the books in the catalogue

      It's called Google.

    53. Re:This could be good by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Funny

      ``But does it belong under "math", "computer science", or "computer languages -> C"? (Dewey seperates Computing out into a seperate category, rather than placing it under math).

      The answer, of course, is all three.''

      ln /math/BookTitle /cs

      What? Your library does not support links? Don't tell me they use Windows... How do you mean ``The Real World doesn't support hard links''? What kind of operating system is that???

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    54. Re:This could be good by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      You don't. Like I, and the dude or dudette to whom I responded, said, you just alphabetize the books and use keywords in a database (and/or card catalog) for lookup when the name of the author is not known.

      NO! Books should be organized chromagrphically by the color of the spine with hue going from left to right and saturation going vertically.

      Incidentally the Dewey Decimal Classification is not the Dewey Decimal System. You and I know the Dewey Decimal System as simply 'decimals'. Dewey was the guy who worked out you could represent fractions by using a decimal point and working to the right... The book catalog was the only part of his scheme to be widely used in his lifetime.

      Incidentally, Dewey has been dead long enough for the copyright on the original catalog scheme to have long expired. You cannot trademark catalog values. This is yet another case of a lawsuit that really should result in sanctions against the plaintif and plaintif counsel.

      I don't think that it is likely OCLC have trademarked the term Dewey in connection with the Hotel trade. Nor is their trademark likely to be very strong since the trademark strength comes from the name Dewey rather than the value that OCLC have added to the brand.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    55. Re:This could be good by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      The latest release of PHPNuke (a simple php/mysql based web portal, a very scaled down slash code almost) does this when submitting a news item. You choose a main topic which is what determines the icon/category it appears as on the main page, but you can associate news submissions with multiple categories for the purpose of searches so one posting will appear under every category selected.

    56. Re:This could be good by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      How many mp3 are in your collection labeled as "The Beatles" and how many are labled "Beatles"? And while you're at it... count the ones labled "Beatles, The" too. Let some typos come into it and see how usefull the system might be in the end.

      --
      bickerdyke
    57. Re:This could be good by cfuse · · Score: 1
      I have the same problem with my more than 6000 (all legally acquired) MP3s

      Legally acquired? Clearly you are a terrorist. The RIAA told me so.

    58. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to junk the old hierarchical filesystem, and go for one built around a database.

      Metadata (tracklength, artist, composer, genre, album, etc etc) goes in the database, and is associated with the file on the disc. Many-to-many relationships (eg track to genre) come naturally, and you can easily set up file sets (analogous to directories) - for example, "all files in genres A or B composed between 1866 and 1900".

      Luckily, I believe the next version of Windows is monving towards this approach, which has been kicking around research labs for a while now.

    59. Re:This could be good by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      No doubt. The DDC is such a pain in the ass when you're used to LOC.

      I always found the LOC system infuriating. It mixes the languages with the literature, which is a pain, and then goes on to seperate out military history and naval history.

      I was shocked to find major research universities using DDC

      Oklahoma State University (over two million volumes) is organized by DDC.

    60. Re:This could be good by shirai · · Score: 1

      They invented this ideal system. They call it Amazon.com. :)

      Seriously, when I need to find a book, I may or may not buy it at Amazon, but you sure can bet that that's where I start looking for it.

      Admittedly, it may not work for really old books but I'm not in the market for too many of those.

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

    61. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Its not that simple. Its not just about numbers. Its about what number you assign a book. An earlier post had an example about the book algorithms in C. Does it go under math or computer science. Does a book about architectural art go under art or architecture? Does a book about the technical details of WWII tanks go under engineering or warfare or history? The people that run the DDC have entire teams of people that go through and make decisions like this. I gave really basic examples but once you really get into the heirarchy things can get more complicated. Especialy when you take into account that not all librarys need just the top couple of levels. Sure that works for public librarys, but what if you're running say, a religious library where you've got 100,000 books just about religion. The DDC has special addendums to itself just for this type of instance to allow very specific catagorization for librarys of that type and developing all that isn't cheap. The $500/year that librarys have to pay really isn't all that bad when you look at it in those terms.

      --Greg

    62. Re:This could be good by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

      *Bangs head on wall*

      Been to a library lately?

      WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK THEY ARE DOING??


      The Dewey system is one way of determining the physical locations of books (and they also tend to end up grouped by subject, making things simpler for physical browsing).

      I was just pointing out that multiple logical mappings onto the same physical location (any particular book, for instance), could be trivially accomplished, even with the current system. (It could even be accomplished with card catalogues--computers just make it much more manageable). I had my local library's computer catalogue system in mind when I posted.

      The parent poster seemed to think that all this is infeasible, despite its similarity to the way things are currently done.

      Of course, if you spent more time paying attention, and less banging your head against the wall, you'd know that already.

    63. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, libraries do use hierarchical shelving. That's what DDS and LOC are all about.

    64. Re:This could be good by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

      You aren't one of those nasty persons who believes that "open stacks" are unnecessary, are you?

      I simply mentioned the feasibility of more a flexible search system for library materials. Changing the books' physical locations is unnecessary.

    65. Re:This could be good by volpe · · Score: 1

      ...it seems to me to be a simple hierachical identifier, a lot like er.. IP addressing

      Uh oh...

    66. Re:This could be good by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      By author? How often do people do research by author rather than by subject? What if you have two authors with the same name but writing in very different subjects?

      "By author" would single-handedly be the worst way to organize books. The local video store here in Japan has attempted to organize a large number of movies by director, which has only served to keep the employees busy having to find every single movie for every single patron, who can now no longer browse by genre. (One of the other terrible attempts at organization at a video store is to organize titles by "popularity"; a subjective, and therefore suspect, method if I've ever heard one.)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    67. Re:This could be good by mpe · · Score: 1

      Shelving by author is fine, barely, for fiction, where a lot people tend to read every book by a particular author.

      A couple of cases where it falls down are were you have books with multiple authors or books which are related written by different authors.

    68. Re:This could be good by aborchers · · Score: 1
      It's simple really. You're not supposed to just make up LOC numbers for you local archive out of thin air.


      According to my former-librarian spouse, this statement is incorrect. LOC is a classification scheme, not a registration number (actually they may also offer something like that, analogous to an ISBN, but we didn't discuss that). Ergo, there is nothing per se wrong with a library assigning an LOC classification. You would generally want to check against existing classifications from other libraries and OCLC, but you can assign LOC numbers without the book being registered there.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    69. Re:This could be good by dltallan · · Score: 1

      "I thought the only people still using it were in countries that didn't want to submit to LOC guidelines because their own copyright laws were uhm, different."

      DDC is very commonly used in public libraries.

      I've used and worked in both university libraries (using a modified LOC) and public libraries (using DDC) and have studied both in library school (on the way to an MLS).

      They both have their advantages and disadvantages. Both can be used to easily pinpoint very specific books in a large collection (you can use a heck of a lot of decimal places in the DDC, and if you know it well, those decimals can carry a lot of information as the same patters show up all over the system). Both are single access systems (for shelving books) and so will end up putting books (many of which have multiple appropriate subjects) in places where you aren't looking for them. That's why it is best to use the OPAC if you want to thoroughly cover the field before heading to the shelves.

      LOC is often found in large research collections. This system was custom designed specifically for the Library of Congress and works better for those libraries that are more similar to the Library of Congress. The more different your library is, the less likely it is to work for you. If you have a very different collection, the LOC may have a wide range to cover just a few books in your collection and a narrow range to cover areas in which your collection is rich. That's why the University of Toronto Library was using a modified LOC - they needed more range in Canadiana.

      DDC is more suited to a general collection of the type found in public libraries. Also as the system most people learn and use in their youths, it is appropriate for a library that doesn't want to make infrequent researchers (most users of a local public library) learn a whole new system. If I were selcting a system to use in a small public library branch, I know I'd sure as heck use DDC over LOC.

      Interestingly, when I studied Library Science at the University of Toronto, while the overall University Library used a modified LOC (as I mention above) the Faculty of Library and Information Science Library used DDC.

      Respectfully,
      David Tallan

      --
      Respectfully, David Tallan
    70. Re:This could be good by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Hrmm ... a valid use for RFID chips?

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    71. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well your f-ls ought to take that up with the LOC because this is what they say.

      Remember, Google knows MORE than you do.

    72. Re:This could be good by pyser · · Score: 1

      It's called Google.

      Last time I was at the library the librarian couldn't find the book I wanted in the online catalogue, so she went to Amazon.com to look it up.

    73. Re:This could be good by jbottero · · Score: 1

      A Google search for "Apple MacIntoshes" produces nothing for several pages except computer.

    74. Re:This could be good by aborchers · · Score: 1
      Well your f-ls ought to take that up with the LOC because this is what they say. [loc.gov]


      Linked behind this is a statement "With the implementation of the LC ILS on August 16, 1999, ..."

      The "former" in my wife's title correlates to mid-1998, so there's a good reason for the confusion.


      Remember, Google knows MORE than you do.


      Does it know that you're a sarcastic smartass hiding your lack of social grace behind an AC checkbox?

      Grow up and learn to participate in civil discussions or do us a favor and go away. Posts like yours are the reason I generally don't reply to (or even read) ACs. Thanks for reminding me what a waste of time the practice is...

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    75. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look bud, I like to keep high scores as much as I can in my karma whoring user record. Call it whoring, call it vanity whatever. I'm a vain whore, big deal. So being a vain whore I prefer not to waste slots doing grunt research responses that are only going to concern one person in a thread using my user account.
      And you needn't be so upset. We were both half right. And the Google remark was meant to be a take-off on Dr. Science. Lighten up.

    76. Re:This could be good by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Agreed - there is a lot of work involved in categorizing the books - but that doesn't change the system. In fact, it's largely so damm hard because the system is so restrictive. Trying to describe a book from a series of predefined categories is not natural - why not just write an abstract describing the book, and then you could search on the words in the abstract? To uniquely identify the book, you just need a unique number - like the ISBN. This number does not have to say anything about the content of the book. The DDC tries to do both with just some numbers and the mother of all lookup tables. It was designed to be searched by humans. Information technology has moved on - there are far more suitable ways to represent this inside a computer.

      I agree though - that designing the model is only part of it - someone still has to type all that sh*t in, and make those decisions - DDC just doesn't help them much though does it?

      The main thing though - is that it's a standard, which means that unfortunately, some central body has to maintain the damm thing - and they can't do it for free, and no: $500pa is not a lot. But one of the downsides to centralised standards is that they are blooming difficult to shift later no matter how antiquated they get. VHS for eg.

      Well if it is the categories they are claiming as IP I take your point. The "system" isn't worth tuppence though.

    77. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fruit?!?!
      Everyone know that apple is a vegatable

    78. Re:This could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dewey number is used to park the book on a shelf. It can only be in one locatation, so one number. There is no reason other classification numbers can not be applied to the item, just as there are several subject headings for the item. A free text search is not ideal, you would get too many hits. A search by title index might be best. Or subject headings. Structured data is a valuable asset to information.

      Sincerely,
      David Bigwood

  3. Fees for this? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next thing you know, someone's going to start charging for Linux.

    Oh, wait...

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    1. Re:Fees for this? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, someone's going to start charging for Linux.

      Or International Standard country codes.

      Ahh.

    2. Re:Fees for this? by MarkJensen · · Score: 1
      This just Announced:

      Darl McBride has filed claims indicating that SCO Unixunaware has IP claims on Binary, Decimal, Hexadecimal, and Dewydecimal.
      They released the obsufuscated proof: !@#$%^&*()
      This proves ownership of the numbers 0-9.

      Comments also attributed to Mr. McBride seem to threaten the ancient Romans, as the System V code shows the same history, "copied line-for-line" to the roman numerals I, II, III, IV, V, VI, etc.

  4. nice quote inside the article by selderrr · · Score: 1

    "At a minimum, if they want to continue to use it, there certainly has to be some sort of a license to the Library Hotel," he said. "We're not interested in putting the hotel out of business."

    ___P>

    I suppose ___P> is phonetics for foot-in-mouth ?

  5. 340 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dewey Decimal for Law books. They're gonna need it.

  6. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats odd, but funny i wonder when it'll be in the public domain

  7. wheel by potpie · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've often wondered if I could patent the wheel and axle... of the inclined plane- that was mine too.

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:wheel by BabyDave · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude, but someone's beaten you to it

    2. Re:wheel by potpie · · Score: 1

      ok so i guess somebody on the other side of the world just happened to try what I jokingly said. Does that truly warrant a point deduction?!

      --
      Esoteric reference.
  8. Out of business by larien · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We're not interested in putting the hotel out of business.
    Er, so why are you suing for "triple the hotel's profits since its opening or triple the organization's damages, whichever is greater"? Yes, they're willing to settle, but to be honest, the first line should have been a lawyer's letter, not filing a complaint. I can only assume that the lawyers can charge more for filing a complaint so they advised them to file rather than discuss.
    1. Re:Out of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The lawsuit said the center sent three letters to
      > Kallan from October 2000 to October 2002, asking
      > for acknowledgment of Online's ownership of the
      > Dewey trademarks, but the hotel owner didn't respond.

      So, um, that's not enough in the way of "first they should send a letter"?

    2. Re:Out of business by signe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read the article first, please.

      The lawsuit said the center sent three letters to Kallan from October 2000 to October 2002, asking for acknowledgment of Online's ownership of the Dewey trademarks, but the hotel owner didn't respond.

      While I agree the hotel should pay the back licensing fees, I think this lawsuit is a little excessive. But given that they said letters were sent, it's probably just to get the hotel's attention. The OCLC even says at the bottom of the article that they're looking to settle, and they don't want the hotel to go out of business. They just want a licensing agreement.

      I've been to the Library Hotel. It's a really nice place. Yes, the books play an integral part in the ambiance of the hotel. But the use of the Dewey Decimal System is hardly the biggest thing they've got going for them, or the most important. They could easily drop the DDC classifications of the floors and rooms and the hotel would lose nothing by it.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    3. Re:Out of business by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      I do not agree that the Hotel should pay anything. The talk about the system for 1800. The hotel shows the VERU highest level of system. The sub sections (ie room numbers) that not bases in the system.

      There is no Trademark infringement in my eyes. Just another greed company with it hands in every's one public pocket tring to justify its existance.

      My bet is if you wnet to corporate headquarters all you will find 75% unpaided A/R clerks.

      Maybe they should merge wth SCO.

    4. Re:Out of business by Arker · · Score: 1

      While I agree the hotel should pay the back licensing fees

      No they shouldn't. This is exactly the kind of crap that shows why 'IP' is a bad idea. How can someone own the idea of classifying books by subject hierarchically?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    5. Re:Out of business by taeric · · Score: 1

      The only catch is that this is a trademark case. They could probably have kept everything the same, but not used the name Dewey Decimal System and been in the clear.

    6. Re:Out of business by Meowing · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One more time: The hotel isn't just using the classification system, it stole the trademark "Dewey Decimal" to advertise a profit-making business that uses the system. If Microsoft decided to rename its Services for Unix product to Linux.NET without getting Mr. Torvald's permission, would that be okay?

    7. Re:Out of business by friedo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sigh. Nobody owns "the idea of classifying books by subject hierarchically."


      OCLC owns their specific system. If you want to create your own subject hierarchy, be my guest.

    8. Re:Out of business by rgmoore · · Score: 1
      How can someone own the idea of classifying books by subject hierarchically?

      They don't, and they're not claiming to. They do, however, have the rights to a specific system of categorizing books, one that they've put a lot of time and effort into applying. If the hotel wanted to develop their own, new scheme for classifying books they wouldn't have to pay a red cent, though they'd probably find that it wound up costing them a lot more than paying the proper licensing fees. Every time a new book comes out, somebody has to decide exactly where in the system it goes. Multiply that effort by the millions of books that have been published and you have a lot of time and effort that's been devoted to developing the system. It's not right for somebody to come along and use that system, together with the name and goodwill that the developers have generated, without compensating those developers for their effort.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    9. Re:Out of business by Talinom · · Score: 1

      While I agree the hotel should pay the back licensing fees, I think this lawsuit is a little excessive.

      Speaking of excessive, are they going to have to pay back licence fees to SBC as well? Their website uses frames. Frames have been covered on Slashdot before.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    10. Re:Out of business by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell from the OCLC website, it is perfectly permissible to simply by the abridged version, touted as "appropriate for libraries with up to 20,000 titles" for $99. There is no mention of ongoing license fees whatsoever for anything but their on-line products, which clearly wouldn't apply. If that is true, I can't see how any court would award damages equivalent to 300% of profits over three years over a $99 oversight, or even the severe maximum of $1500 bucks. That would be like charging Microsoft a penalty of $15 Billion for not properly registering a couple copies of Adobe Photoshop. The argument that they are infringing trademark by implying connection to their product is silly -- it is still a library as much as any other, none of which claim to be connected to DD by anything other than utility.

      Then again, if they're successful, maybe Eolas can recover an additional hundred billion or two in damages. Fair is fair, right?

    11. Re:Out of business by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      If Microsoft decided to rename its Services for Unix product to Linux.NET without getting Mr. Torvald's permission, would that be okay?

      Sure, who cares? While trademark law is the one part of "intellectual property" I don't mind (like I do copyright and patents), I'm not really that interested in defending to the death my "right" to not be able to say the word Dewey Decimal System in those contexts.
    12. Re:Out of business by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the main point of this whole discussion is to shock the majority of us into the realization that the "Dewey Decimal System" is, in fact, trademarked and NOT just a public domain concept for sorting of books.

      Quite frankly, I'm still a little shocked by this fact itself. Perhaps I shouldn't be, but I never heard of libraries actually paying yearly fees for the rights to use it, until now.

      Somehow, it just rings hollow - like someone telling me I'm not allowed to express computer notation in hexidecimal (or even announce publically that I'm offering a "decimal to hexidecimal conversion calculator" on my web site) without paying someone for the privilege.

      I never particularly cared for the Dewey Decimal System to begin with. I just assumed it was a public domain method developed by and for use by public libraries - and was used simply because it was an (inter?)national standard. I certainly don't see why it's worth paying licensing fees for it! If I had a library, I'd dump it in a heartbeat.

    13. Re:Out of business by Reverend528 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would anyone want to rename Services For Unix? It has such a catchy acronym.

    14. Re:Out of business by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      The business itself (i.e. organizing the rooms) could be considered to be using the original 1870 incarnation, since it is merely organized by the original general categories, which IS in the public domain. The fact that it contains an actual library that may or may not use later editions covered by copyright is potentially a different issue. Remember they have not proceeded with a stitch of discovery so there is no evidence whatsoever at this point, which renders this whole ordeal complete speculation.

    15. Re:Out of business by Meowing · · Score: 1

      There isn't really any need for speculation, since the evidence is right in the hotel's advertising, including advertising they are presenting on the Internet at this moment. They can number things any way the like, but they don't have permission to use the name in trade. Forst Press in its various incarnations has held the "Dewey Decimal Classification" mark since 1876, and even went to the trouble of registering in 1962.

    16. Re:Out of business by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Okay, but how did this other outfit acquire the trademark rights in the first place? That is, how did they manage to get a trademark issued for a system that was apparently in the public domain as of 130 years ago?

      Seriously, does anyone know?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:Out of business by Meowing · · Score: 1

      It's really been the same publisher all along. The publisher changed hands a few times over the past century and a half, the same as countless other organizations. The 1962 registration isn't when the trademark first came into being, that goes back to the 19th century. Unregistered marks (the ones that get a TM) are still generally valid in common law, registering (the flavor that has a circled R) just helps to give them teeth. In that respect it's a bit like how US copyright works.

    18. Re:Out of business by kien · · Score: 1
      There is no Trademark infringement in my eyes. Just another greed company with it hands in every's one public pocket tring to justify its existance.

      While I agree that the damages being sought in this case seem to be excessive, OCLC is required to defend their trademark in order to keep it. Whether that's a good enough excuse for this action is probably a different debate. (I wonder if trademarks are infinite as long as they are defended?)

      I've actually been to OCLC and they stay pretty busy there. In addition to databasing all the books of the libraries that license from them, they also use that database to facilitate book-swaps between member libraries. Which means, if your local library doesn't have a book you want and pays OCLC licensing fees, they can borrow that book from any other library that also pays OCLC. (At least I think that's how it works.) Their facility in Dublin is one of the coolest buildings I've ever seen. They're not totally evil.

      Maybe they should merge wth SCO.

      Ouch...they don't quite deserve that do they? Come on, I've got friends that work there! ;) And keep in mind that librarians and their associated organizations happen to stand right alongside the slashdot crowd when it comes to a lot of the evil gov't laws like DMCA and Patriot Act.

      I've got a feeling that in this case, they'll settle on a license and be done with it but I'll be sure to ask my friends to keep me posted.

      --K.
      --
      Sig: Bad people happen. Try to avoid being one of them.
    19. Re:Out of business by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ah, that explains their involvement. Tho as some here have pointed out, when the entire rest of the world thinks of the product in question as public domain, that trademark is already toast.

      Got any good references on the common-law trademark?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    20. Re:Out of business by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • I just assumed it was a public domain method developed by and for use by public libraries


      Development costs. :)
    21. Re:Out of business by Arker · · Score: 1

      I've known about this for some time actually. Library where I volunteered years ago couldn't pay these damn fees, and decided to categorise new books on their own and not pay. They got some really nasty letters claiming they had to pay anyway. I don't know what finally happened with it, but I've known for some time there's a group of lawyers claiming they own this crap and threatening to sue anyone that uses it and doesn't pay them.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    22. Re:Out of business by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      Great the sell a datbase. This hotel is not database.

      About trademarks... OCLC does not even show on their website a TM with any of DDC. They do not even protect their trademark on their site.

      This is the most I have found: "Since the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system was created some 130 years ago, it's easy to assume that the Dewey name is in the public domain. However, it never has been, and since 1988, OCLC Online Computer Library Center has held the trademark on the Dewey name."

      So the best they can claim is "Dewey"?

      The Hotel wins.

    23. Re:Out of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Library Hotel can easily wiggle out of this by dropping the word..."Dewey" and nothing else! I inspected the US Patent and Trademark Office files, and found that the trademark owner has a trademark on the phrase "Dewey Decimal Classification", but has expressly *disclaimed* the phrase "Decimal Classification".

      See http://tess2.uspto.gov, and search for "DEWEY DECIMAL".

      If this case does not resolve itself by the Hotel simply dropping the word DEWEY and continuing with the classified Library scheme, then the trademark owners are guilty of some seriously ABUSIVE behavior.
      -former USPTO employee

    24. Re:Out of business by Meowing · · Score: 1

      I see that Google turns up lts of good hits for this one, so I"ll just touch on the main differences.

      - If you rely on a common law trademark, you basically get "squatter's rights" in the geographical areas where you trade. This is, for example, why there can be an unrelated Joe's Diner in every town. These kinds of rights will even prevent someone who later registers a national mark from using it on your turf.

      - If you don't register your mark, you'll run into roadblocks trying to file in a federal court, dealing with offshore businesses, and so on.

      There was a case where a Canadian company called LANworks (I think they've since been merged into into 3Com) was selling network boot code in the US. Shortly after they appeared, DEC renamed their PCSA product to LANWORKS. Even though DEC registered first, the Canadian Lanworks got to market first and DEC was forced to come up with a new name (Pathworks).

      Another thing that seems to be bothering Slashdot readers is the idea that really old trademarks can still be valid. Unlike patents and (supposedly) copyright, trademarks don't expire as long as they remain active and are defended. Louis Chevrolet died a long, long time ago, but Ford still wouldn't be allowed to put his name on their cars today.

      Dewey Decimal has never been a generic term, it describes exactly one numbering system. There are no competing publishers producing indexing systems under the same name. This isn't at all like the perpetual Kleenex question where there are multiple products being called the same thing in common usage.

      Libraries tend to fade into the background of public consciousness, but just because this isn't a hot consumer product doesn't mean that the trademark is any less valid. If anything, it makes it stronger, because the name is more strongly defined in its niche.

      Finally, what really surprises me is how many people weren't aware that Dewey Decimal was a brand name. I know I learned that back when I was a kid, but then again I was always one of those strange creatures who actually read all the trivial fine print crammed into the front and back books and leaflets, and just had to find out what all those obscure disclaimers and printer's marks meant.

    25. Re:Out of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dewey Decimal is generic. It is too bad this company, whatever it is, did not vigorously defend its trademark. I, and hundreds of millions of U.S. school children, learned about the Dewey Decimal system. There was no (R), or any other indication of it being a registered (or unregistered) trademark in our textbooks. DDS has long since fallend into common, generic use for a classification system for books. Sorry, Charlie. They did not defend their mark. They lost it. A long, long time ago.

    26. Re:Out of business by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Finally, what really surprises me is how many people weren't aware that Dewey Decimal was a brand name.
      I'm surprised to find that it's a product at all. I mean, it's 'just' an ordered list, a sequence, like 1 to 9 or the scheme letters are ordered to form the alphabet. I think no one ever had the idea of inventing (and making a trademark out of it) an alternative alphabet.
      I know I learned that back when I was a kid, but then again I was always one of those strange creatures who actually read all the trivial fine print crammed into the front and back books and leaflets, and just had to find out what all those obscure disclaimers and printer's marks meant.
      Hey, we're reading /. we're the people who have been called strange :-)

      --
      bickerdyke
    27. Re:Out of business by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      numbering hotel rooms according to a library indexing system.... thats not infringement, thats a tribute!

      --
      bickerdyke
    28. Re:Out of business by Meowing · · Score: 1

      I think no one ever had the idea of inventing (and making a trademark out of it) an alternative alphabet.

      Sure you have! Unicode is just such a beast.

      Hey, we're reading /. we're the people who have been called strange :-)

      I thought that was the kid from Beetlejuice.

    29. Re:Out of business by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Is it that hard to pickup a phone?

      If I'd received letters from someone claiming to own the DDC I'd think they were a crackpot and wouldn't even bother to reply too. Someone should have contacted the hotel manager and actually explained the situation.

    30. Re:Out of business by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Nobody owns "the idea of classifying books by subject hierarchically."

      Such would fall under patent law, and even if Mr. Dewey had patented it in the 1870's, it would have long since expired. And because of the obvious prior are, nobody can patent it now. Yay!

    31. Re:Out of business by Aquillion · · Score: 1

      This isn't even about whether or not they own the system. This is about their trademark on the term "Dewey Decimal System" as it refers to such a thing -- those three words, nothing more, nothing less.

    32. Re:Out of business by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks, good info. When I was a kid I also had a distressing tendency to RTFLabel [g] Nonetheless, even tho in grade school (early 1960s) we were taught the DDC in tiresome detail, not a word about it being a trademark ever came up.

      As to the kleenerox issue (new word :) how "commonly" used does something have to be before it falls out of the realm of trademark? Because libraries commonly use the system without any mention of where it comes from, and even librarians often use "Dewey decimal system" as (or at least as if it were) a generic term.

      I have a sort of common-law trademark in my business name, which I've used since 1975. A few years ago a vaguely related business used the same name, but they seem to have died before anyone got around to protesting the name duplication. If it came to a fight, I'm wondering how much weight it would hold that I have fairly old correspondence so-addressed, and registered the domain as well.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    33. Re:Out of business by pyser · · Score: 1

      When I was a tender nerd of only 7 I categorized the books on the bookshelf in my bedroom according to the Dewey(tm) Decimal System. Does this mean I owe 20+ years of triple my lifetime income for having done so?

    34. Re:Out of business by pyser · · Score: 1

      Seems like scores of cash-strapped public libraries and public school systems should scrap Dewey in favor of LC then. Oh wait, these are the same cash-strapped public school systems that just threw out thousands of perfectly good Macs (that the teachers and students really liked) and installed millions of dollars worth of "free" Microsoft software (M$'s valuation, not mine), not seeing the train wreck down the road when they are forced to upgrade...

    35. Re:Out of business by cyrus007 · · Score: 1

      ... and use your brain a little bit. The hotel owner thought it to be so absurd that a system dating back to 1800 hundreds can be used to sue somebody of infringement. No wonder the hotel owner ignored those letters.

  9. their site sucks by gritz · · Score: 0

    i hate auto resizers >:(

    1. Re:their site sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Scripts & Plugins

      Uncheck "Move or resize existing windows"

    2. Re:their site sucks by rblancarte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Man, forget the resizer - what is the first thing I am greeted with? THE EROTICA PACKAGE What kind of clientel do they have?

      But you are right - that resizer blows.

      The hotel does look really really nice. Actually sounds like a cool place to stay. ($250 and up a night)

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  10. Open source, anyone? by dostalgic · · Score: 1

    Yet another example of IPR gone awry. Anyone interested in starting a Sourceforge project for an open source classification system?

    1. Re:Open source, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      open source already has a classificatin system:
      • planning stage (we thought up a name and signed up teh project at sourceforge!)
      • waiting stage (waiting for other people to do all the work)
      • alpha stage (linus just switched VM or FS subsystems)
      • release stage (some company released their 20 year old software as open source)
    2. Re:Open source, anyone? by FrankoBoy · · Score: 1

      This one's not open source but at least it's public domain AFAIK : the Library of Congress classification system.

      I've already done a Web site with content classified under Dewey rules, so that means I could have get sued ? Gee, that IP Scheisse is getting sillier by the day...

    3. Re:Open source, anyone? by phallux · · Score: 1

      No need to reinvent the wheel. Since the use of physical cards, paper, or books is obviously an obsolete method of cataloging in the electronic era, the following are likely what future cataloging systems will look like (based on XML, of course):

      W3C's RDF Specification: http://www.w3.org/RDF

      Dublin Core: http://dublincore.org
    4. Re:Open source, anyone? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      That's a great question to ask Google, I'd bet. In more ways than one, no less.

      I've been actively involved with the local public library for years now, since at least the early 1980's. Most of the staff are now family and friends. And you should *see* how much they paid for their (custom, proprietary) catalog software. No I don't know the exact amount offhand, but it was in the 6 figures according to rumour.

      --
      C|N>K
  11. School library by Leffe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hmm... from what I've found out about DDC, it seems like my school library uses it.

    I really doubt they have a license. And there's no way to find out until tuesday... I can't wait!

    Oh, and here's a nice intro on DDC:

    http://www.oclc.org/dewey/versions/ddc22print/intr o.pdf
    (Why is there a space between the 'r' and 'o'?)

    1. Re:School library by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      slashcode has a phrase character limit to prevent excessively long phrases from distorting borders, perhaps their choice of length is a bit draconian, and the implementation a bit crude, but it's rather effective. =)

    2. Re:School library by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine your local department of education pays the license on behalf. Either that, or the owner of the trademark gives out free licenses for educational institutions.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    3. Re:School library by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      http://www.oclc.org/dewey/versions/ddc22print/intr o.pdf
      (Why is there a space between the 'r' and 'o'?)


      So that it will wrap on non-wide screens instead of people having to scroll over.

      --Dan

  12. Connections by mopslik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    "A person who came to their Web site and looked at the way (the hotel) is promoted and marketed would think they were passing themselves off as connected with the owner of the Dewey Decimal Classification system."

    Don't you think that a person browsing the website might just think "Oh, they're a theme hotel"?

    On the other hand, if libraries have to license it, then I guess that's how it works.

    1. Re:Connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't you think that a person browsing the website might just think "Oh, they're a theme hotel"?

      What do you think people are, mind readers? It's just like how Spike TV is *obviously* trying to make money off of Spike Lee's name.

      These lawsuits are vital in reminding us of things that have since been forgotten, like the Dewey Decimal system and Spike Lee.

    2. Re:Connections by kc0dby · · Score: 1

      I think to connect the hotel with the owner of the Dewey Decimal Classification system, the average person would have to believe something this idiotic could still be licensable...

      --
      I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
    3. Re:Connections by Red+Warrior · · Score: 1

      The person would think they're a theme hotel. Since they are and all..

      More important though, the average person would NOT think they were connected with the owner of the DDC, for the simple reason that most people would assume (rationally) that something that has been around so long, used in the nation's public libraries and schools, and FREAKEN TAUGHT in grade school was not "owned".

      I don't have the time right now, but we can all agree that I inserted a 50 page "why IP sucks" rant here. ;->

      --
      "If, therefore, any be unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone."
      ~Epictetus
    4. Re:Connections by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, there's this thing about _trademarks_. A trademark's sole purpose is to identify a product as being associated with a company. It's not supposed to be a guessing exercise as to whether it's "just a theme" or the real thing. It's supposed to always be the real thing, so the buyer can be sure of it.

      That's why when you see "Playstation 2" on a DVD case you assume it's some game for the PS2, and not a "PS2 themed movie" or just a "PS2 themed round piece of plastic that's not even readable in a CD or DVD drive." That's why if you saw "Disneyland" or "Legoland" on a park you'd assume it's actually connected to Disney or Lego, and not just a knock-off that's only sorta themed after the original. Etc.

      And how is that bad, anyway? If anyone could write "Intel Pentium 4" on a CPU, how would you know whether you've got a P4 or an el-cheapo Via CPU or something that's not even x86 compatible? If anyone could write "Apple Macintosh" on any box, regardless of whether it's even Mac compatible at all (or if it's even a computer), how would you know if you got the real thing or not? (Congrats, the PowerBook you've just bought was just a plastic sculpture "themed" after the real thing.)

      Sure, you could do a lot of research, but would it be worth your time? Isn't it much better to just know what you're buying?

      Basically I wish some slashotters could get over the knee-jerk reaction of posting "IP sucks" or "IP is evil" in any imaginable context. Whetever faults we might find with copyright or patents, the trademark concept actually works for the consumer too.

      And it's not even like the poor hotel is being persecuted or anything. They deliberately used someone's trademark, and cheerfully ignored the warnings. They could have passed for a theme hotel just as well without using that trademark.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:Connections by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      IP sucks and is Evil.

  13. Trademarked? by PipianJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How can you trademark the Dewey Decimal System? Sounds more like a patentable system to me... So how did it get filed under the trademark category? (Nice to know they've registered it under the one class of IP which never expires as long as you pay. I mean, look, it says it was created in 1873!)

    1. Re:Trademarked? by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't trademark the system, but you can trademark "Dewey Decimal System". I assume that they're refering to the latter. They certainly can't trademark the system at all, because the system itself is based on numbers, and you can't trademark numbers. As Intel found out, hence the "Pentium" rather than the "80586".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Trademarked? by GnrcMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they trademarked the term "Dewey Decimal System". The objection isn't to the use of the system itself (even if it was patented, I doubt the patent would extend to hotel room clasification) it's that the website uses the term (or trademark) Dewey Decimal System all over it.

    3. Re:Trademarked? by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They can (and presumably have) trademarked the name "Dewey Decimal" as relating to classification systems. As for the system itself, I don't think trademarking or patenting apply (at least not now, as the patent would long since have expired). I'd presume that the particular system would be copyrighted, in that you can't use that system or one sufficiently similar to it without permission.

      Of course, if it were patented, we'd all be protesting about yet another damn silly patent - categorising books based on their subjects and then giving each subject a number, yeah that's really non-obvious.

    4. Re:Trademarked? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      You can certainly trademark "Dewey Decimal System". What the hotel is doing is using the same system for its room numbers, and naming them according to the subject that is referenced by that number.

      I guess the point is that a person who came to their Web site and looked at the way the hotel is promoted and marketed could think they were passing themselves off as connected with the owner of the Dewey Decimal Classification system.

    5. Re:Trademarked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do libraries have to pay licensing fees?

      The article seems to suggest that the libraries are licensing the system... which I find absurd.

      "Intellectual Property" is a propaganda term, enforcing the notion that ideas can somehow be property. Even worse is the misuse of the word "Right"... as in "Intellectual Property Rights," history excluded.

      We should scrap these names in favor of descriptive, objective, honest names. "IP" could be replaced by "LIM" or "Legal Idea Monopoly" - perhaps even "Idea Monopoly". Copyright should be "Copy Monopoly."

      That might also help stop the continual creep of these "Rights" over the Rights and interests of The People.

    6. Re:Trademarked? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      It was patented...130 years ago. The patent has long since expired.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    7. Re:Trademarked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not surprised they are licencing it still. Goto ANY library and pick a book they do not have. They can order that book and have it within a week. Guess what, they order it by number. If those numbers were not the same across the whole system that would simply not work.

      Otherwise it does not take much thought to come up with a divide and conquer numbering system.

      But wow what a shocking large amount of money these dudes must be taking in. What do they do with it?

    8. Re:Trademarked? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      That might also help stop the continual creep of these "Rights" over the Rights and interests of The People.

      You'll need to start by changing the US Constitution, then.

      Article I, Section 8, Clause 8:
      To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

      A patent or copyright is exactly a grant of an exclusive right to use and profit from an idea or a work. That right is no different from your right to express yourself, or to not have soldiers live in your home.

      The real problem with IP is that Congress keeps extending the terms of patents and copyrights, to the point that works copyrighted today won't come into the public domain in our lifetimes, and ideas patented today won't be available to us for decades. A related problem is that the USPTO has fallen into the habit of granting patents for trivial and obvious "inventions."

      I do agree that it seems strange that libraries should have to pay a licensing fee to use the Dewey Decimal System when that system was developed 125 years ago. If said libraries also get a service (classification of new works) in return for the fee, that seems a little more reasonable.

    9. Re:Trademarked? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      hey certainly can't trademark the system at all, because the system itself is based on numbers, and you can't trademark numbers. As Intel found out, hence the "Pentium" rather than the "80586"

      I always thought that was cause they did 486+100 on the first prototype and couldn't fitt all the decimals onto the chip case :-)

      --
      bickerdyke
  14. What's this part supposed to mean? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    u can ask for the defendant's profits, our view is since we have written to these people three different times, it was certainly intentional and it was certainly


    we have no way of knowing until the discovery takes place how much their profits are


    Looks like a slashdot editor added that in... but what's up with the usage of "u" instead of "You"?

    1. Re:What's this part supposed to mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Looks like some leftover crud from the author of the web page. The __P> looks like a broken

      tag.

  15. Question by Hinkkanen · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Does this mean that I'll have to pay if organise my book collection according to Dewey system?

    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right, how can they get a trademark on that?

      Imagine having to pay everytime an engineer/scientist/mathmatician integrates an equation or use any other calculous theorum/expression.

      It appears to me that calculous is much more complex and usefull then the DDS. The entire trademark of the DDS just shows you the greedyness of American buisness.

      There used to be a time when knowledge was sought after because of interest in a topic rather then making money (the great scientist/philosephers of old shaired information while not charging for the use of their theorums/postulets/equations)

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ya but a lot of doctors and engineers of old didn't share, which is exactly why IP laws where created in the first place.

      If you are the only doctor who knows how to cure something why tell your competition?! Just wait a noble gets sick and rake in the cash!

      Or you know how to build the strongest lightest armor, are you gonna go publishing a howto our are you gong to keep it secret to yourself and your guild?

    3. Re:Question by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      They also weren't so obviously hooked on phonics.

      Otherwise, yes; I love your statement. I think that's how things *should* be, and I hold that GNU/Linux is the modern example "shaired information".

      Just my $.02

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Question by Nevo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only if you call it a Dewey Decimal System organization, apparently. If you call it the Hinkkanen System, you're fine. :)

  16. Interesting idea by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    Im pretty sure god and the US gov will sue you for prior art though...

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    1. Re:Interesting idea by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

      If God wants to take someone to court, he'll first have to create an attorney in his own image...
      No, not even an omniscient God can comprehend the Law and court procedures.

    2. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Numbers existed a long time before the US government...

    3. Re:Interesting idea by SMOC · · Score: 0

      Didn't Al Gore invent numbers?

      *DUCKS*

      --
      All errors in this comment are mine. Corrections are considered a derivative work, and punishable under copyright law.
    4. Re:Interesting idea by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > he'll first have to create an attorney in his own image...

      I don't think God would stoop to such a level. Or even if he could. Can God truly create something that evil?

  17. Happy Birthday by careysb · · Score: 1

    I here you are also supposed to pay royalties when you sing the "Happy Birthday" song in public. Strange world.

    1. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hear. h ear. involves ears. think about it.

    2. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I here you are also supposed to pay royalties when you sing the "Happy Birthday" song in public. Strange world.

      True

  18. How the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you own a system of organization?

    Is this saying that if I organize my collection of books into a system similar to that of Dewey's, I will get a Cease and Desist letter?

  19. What have by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hewey and Lewey got to say about this ?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:What have by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      That's Huey and Louie.

    2. Re:What have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they're in Scrooge McDuck's money bin. But if you go to meet them, watch out for the security systems.

    3. Re:What have by Savatte · · Score: 1

      The Online Computer Library Center is being quite the Scrooge for suing that hotel.

  20. Perhaps this is why. by ggroth · · Score: 1

    I hadn't stepped into the local public library since college. On a recent visit it would seem that the Dewey Decimal System had been replaced with a different system using letters. No one present was sure of the reason for the change, giving a bunch of differing opinions depending on who I asked, perhaps this was the reason all along.

    1. Re:Perhaps this is why. by alex_ant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most libraries moved to the Library of Congress classification system in the mid '80s. Dewey is still around in libraries for books added before the switchover.

    2. Re:Perhaps this is why. by analog_line · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's the Library of Congress system, for reasons which should be fairly self explanatory. When I was in high school and during the summers in college, I worked at my local library. During about 4-5 years of time, I and several other people went about the arduous task of methodically stripping the plastic protector off of each hardcover's dust jacket, peel the Dewey Decimal label off, apply the correct LOC label, doublecheck that the right LOC label was applied, put a new plastic covering on the dust jacket (harder than you may think) and reshelve it in the constantly expanding and moving LOC section. All the while with confused patrons complaining because they're utterly used to the old Dewey method and the new fangled thing is throwing them for a loop. They spent FAR more than $500/year doing this switchover, just on how much they paid me on any given year I was there.

      Support your local library, btw, even in the days of the Patriot Act. Librarians are good people, and get a bad rap for being boring that they just don't deserve. Go browse around, most libraries have a few comfortable chairs for reading if you don't feel comfortable creating a record that you checked a particular book out. Never know what you might find in a library. Working at my library was one of the best times in my life.

    3. Re:Perhaps this is why. by analog_line · · Score: 1

      In case you're interested in how exactly the LCC (Library of Congress Classification) works, check out this page at the Library of Congress' website. Shows a complete breakdown of how it works, what all the categories are, etc.

    4. Re:Perhaps this is why. by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      Librarians are good people

      Speaking of that, I'd be interested to hear their opinion on this.

  21. Next thing... by VEGx · · Score: 1
    ...someone starts charging for using alphabet. :-\

    Please, tell me that at least that won't happen... or only for letters "a" and "o"...

    1. Re:Next thing... by rhiorg · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, just for the letters "S" "C" and "O".

    2. Re:Next thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the only letters you will have to pay a license to use will be the S, the C and the O.

    3. Re:Next thing... by perreira · · Score: 1

      And if you happen to live in Germany, you also have to pay for the letter T (like T-Com, former Telekom, former Post)...

      There is now some stupid domain wars going on, T-COm i sueing poeple with domains like t-bag.de ...

  22. Only one solution ... by BabyDave · · Score: 1
  23. I never trusted any decimal system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just the thin end of the wedge used to jam the metric system down our throats.

    1. Re:I never trusted any decimal system by Izago909 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah... my car gets 1260 furlongs to the barrel... and it's gonna stay that way damnit.

      If you are afraid that evil decimals will place you under the oppressive whim of metric (but not US imperial), you should go to your safe haevn of roman numerals and weights and measures based on the Kings' anatomy.

  24. As Einstein once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."

    It's that simple.

  25. hah by yoshi1013 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Excuse me, where can I find a book on astronomy?"

    "Don't you know the Dewey Decimal System????"

    CONAN THE LIBRARIAN!

    1. Re:hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, that's the first thing that came to my mind too. I'm going to be laughing for the rest of the afternoon...

  26. LoC Classification by EngrBohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They really should use The Library of Congress' Classification -- it's currently in use by (most?) libraries, and no one owns a trademark on it!

    --
    cb
    Oooh! What does this button do!?
    1. Re:LoC Classification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They really should use The Library of Congress' Classification -- it's currently in use by (most?) libraries, and no one owns a trademark on it!

      That is the USA's Library of Congress. The EU will need to make a competing format to ensure that the US Library Of Congress can't sue them for infringement if they someday choose to. We can't be having our organizations use a system able to be shut down at the drop of some US politician's hat now can we?

    2. Re:LoC Classification by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

      They really should use The Library of Congress' Classification -- it's currently in use by (most?) libraries, and no one owns a trademark on it!

      Yeah - but then they'd have to spend two floors on American History. I'm sure they'd rather have an "Erotic literature" room to a "Missouri Compromise" room.

    3. Re:LoC Classification by perp · · Score: 2, Funny

      National pride will probably prevent countries other than the US from using a system that divides the history of the world into:

      D -- HISTORY (GENERAL) AND HISTORY OF EUROPE
      E -- HISTORY: AMERICA
      F -- HISTORY: AMERICA

      While I'm sure the LOC system works fine for the Library of Congress, it does not seem to be widely applicable enough to replace the Dewey Decimal Sysem around the world.

      Incidentally, I am shocked that use of the DDC requires royalties more than 100 years after its invention.

      --
      There are two kinds of sysadmins: paranoids and losers. I'm both kinds.
    4. Re:LoC Classification by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh come on. The LoC has made some good choices.
      "BS"--The Bible, Hebrew and Christian

    5. Re:LoC Classification by Excen · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt it, if the librarians have to clean up after the patrons.

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    6. Re:LoC Classification by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure the LOC system works fine for the Library of Congress, it does not seem to be widely applicable enough to replace the Dewey Decimal Sysem around the world.

      You mean the system that breaks down literature by:

      810 American Literature
      820 English Literature
      830 Germanic Literature
      840 French Literature (+ Romance languages)
      850 Italian Literature (+ Romanian)
      860 Spanish Literature (+ Portuguese)
      870 Latin Literature
      880 Greek Literature
      890 Non-European Literature (+ Slavic and Celtic)
      ?

      It also breaks languages down in a similar fashion.

    7. Re:LoC Classification by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Indeed, as somebody who spends a lot of time in Australian research libraries, I've never seen one that used LOC. In fact I was only very vaguely aware of its existence, and was surprised to learn from this story's posts than in the US it seems to be more common than DDC in research libraries!

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  27. I don't get it... by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What "rights" are they talking about here? That is, what sort of IP is being licensed?

    Patents would make a sort of sense, but Dewy Decimal dates back to 1873, so it can't be a patent. Copyright doesn't seem to apply since there isn't obviously a "work" being copied.

    What gives? Is it just a matter of the trademark?

    1. Re:I don't get it... by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      Oops. Yeah, yeah. RTFP...

  28. How is this even possible? by tbase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to this page, Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) anonymously published the system in 1876.

    On the other hand, it seems that the Online Compyter Library Center does do quite a bit of work to maintain the system, which should entitle them to some rights - but it sure seems that if some guy published something anonymously in 1876, he probably intended it to be in the public domain. Seems to me, if the hotel was based on the original system, and not the one improved by subsequent owners, he should be ok - especially if they referred to it as the "Melvil Dewey System" or something.

    I had no idea it was owned - how come they aren't going after the elementary schools that teach the system? Or is that included in their library's license? And how come we're teaching a proprietary, trademarked system? Next thing you know, they'll be teaching our kids Windows!!!

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:How is this even possible? by Henry+Stern · · Score: 1
      According to this page, Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) anonymously published the system in 1876.


      You'd think that it would be in the public domain by now, wouldn't you?
    2. Re:How is this even possible? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      Dewey didn't in 1876 do the work of adding 100,000 books to the system last year. So if someone wants to use the general idea he put out all those years ago - fine. This group does considerable work each year - adding all the new books to the system, making them at least somewhat referencable, and helping the various libraries out with loans. There are millions and millions of books catagorized in the system now, and its that IP that they own, and share with libraries. In exchange, they ask for a small amount of money to use the system.
      So someone explain to me why this is newsworthy? Seems pretty damn straight forward to me. Don't live off someone else's work. Are people not allowed to get paid for what they do?

    3. Re:How is this even possible? by Meowing · · Score: 1

      it sure seems that if some guy published something anonymously in 1876, he probably intended it to be in the public domain.

      Nope. Then, as now, there were provisions to leave one's name off a published work and still retain copyright. This is what Dewey did. He published it through a company he controlled.

      elementary schools that teach the system? Or is that included in their library's license?

      Yep. Training materials have long been a part of it.

      And how come we're teaching a proprietary, trademarked system?

      Nearly everything you'll find in a library is proprietary, copyrighted material. The system is taught because it's what many libraries use, and people need to know how to find stuff in them.

      Alternatives are now available, such as the Library of Congress system, and a number of newer libraries, notably in academentia, do use it. The cost of replacing the catalog for an existing collection has to be weighed against the price of Dewey manuals, though.

    4. Re:How is this even possible? by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      So called "non-profits" shouldn't be allowed to be "paid for what they do," no. Nor should they be allowed to hold intellectual "property."

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    5. Re:How is this even possible? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Then how should these non-profits fund their operation?

    6. Re:How is this even possible? by Elm+Tree · · Score: 1


      Ah! I get it. Since they went to all the trouble of catagorizing each room in the hotel the hotel should have to pay. Makes perfect sense me me.

    7. Re:How is this even possible? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      did you even read the article? In the rooms there are books for that #. Who determined the numbers for those books? Might sound trivial to you, but considering its scale its not. Also considering that one can look things up via title, author, and various subjects...

      Are they asking for too much? I'd think maybe, except for the other part of the article no one seems to be reading, which states that they sent 3 letters to the hotel owner, and he didn't respond to them. After a while, one has to get tough I guess. If I owned something someone was effectively stealing, and I asked nicely for a couple of years for them to pay for it, I would get a little annoyed eventually as well.

    8. Re:How is this even possible? by stubear · · Score: 1

      It's possible because this is a trademark infringement lawsuit. Trademarks are perpetual until the owner gives up its use or does not protect it, making it generic. The Library Hotel wrongfully infringed upon the trademark itself though they could likely continue using it as long as they didn't reference it by name.

    9. Re:How is this even possible? by belroth · · Score: 1
      Are you new to /.?
      Why are you bringing logic to a /. rant?

      (For the humour impaired, yes I release that the poster to whom I am replying has a much lower slashid then I do).

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    10. Re:How is this even possible? by pla · · Score: 1

      Don't live off someone else's work.

      Heh, did you even read tahat before hitting "post"?

      Don't live off someone else's work... So, for example, we shouldn't find some dead guy named Dewey, steal his work, extend it a bit, and start suing people who use the dead guy's name without our permission?


      Are people not allowed to get paid for what they do?

      Depends on what they do. In this case, they just categorize books. If I come up with a system of classifying books as "good" or "bad", can I sue you for recommending a book to a friend as "good"? I doubt it. Yet, the issue at hand just has a somewhat better granularity (and the same level of subjectivity, as others have pointed out).

      More importantly, this seems to center on the use of the exact phrase "Dewey Decimal System". I have to wonder how much water that can hold, using a person's (other than one's own) name in a trademark. Could I trademark "Bush is an Idiot", then sue the press drones who repeat that 10 times a day?

    11. Re:How is this even possible? by TomV · · Score: 1

      So, for example, we shouldn't find some dead guy named Dewey, steal his work,[...]

      Seeing as it's a hotel they're suing, rather than a library support organisation, I think OCLC are completely mad to do this at all, but in fairness they are the current owners of all the copyrights and trademarks associated with the ongoing Dewey Decimal System information product, now in its 22nd edition, so they didn't steal it, it was assigned to them by the previous copyright holder. And if you don't protect your Trademarks, they dilute.

      I have to wonder how much water that can hold, using a person's (other than one's own) name in a trademark

      Ford, McDonald's and Hoover seem reasonably confident ... :-)

      tomV

    12. Re:How is this even possible? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Trademarks don't die.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    13. Re:How is this even possible? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      Trademarks don't die.

      Soon you'll be able to say...

      ...for thine is the Copyright and the Patent and the Trademark, forever and ever. Amen.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    14. Re:How is this even possible? by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. Donations? If their cause is truly worthy, or if there's mutual interest, shouldn't be a problem, right? Otherwise, they can form a for-profit corporation and come out of the closet about wanting to make money.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  29. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  30. Bullshit by rde · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "A person who came to their Web site and looked at the way (the hotel) is promoted and marketed would think they were passing themselves off as connected with the owner of the Dewey Decimal Classification system."

    Yeah, right. If I was particularly jetlagged, drunk or whatever, I might pop up to the counter and ask to speak to Melvil Dewey. But I'm sure I'm not alone in that I never even considered that a numeric system invented in the next-to-previous century would still be owned today, much less that anyone who used it would be representative of that owner.

    It's lucky that I'm ambivalent about my primary school; when I was there, I organised the books according to the Dewey system. If I were at all bitter, I'd rat them out, and not just becuase the 098 section was completely empty.

    Oh, and here's something funny. In my research for this comment, I typed 'dewey 098' into google to see if it still meant what I thought it did.
    098 is for forbidden books. Now that you know that google for 'dewey 098' while you're feeling lucky.

    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...slashdotted. anyone got a link to a cache?

    2. Re:Bullshit by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Says here it's for "other classifications." It looks like it's used for state documents mostly. I don't see any mention of forbidden books.

    3. Re:Bullshit by rde · · Score: 1

      That's just a list of other classification systems. Look here

  31. Created in 1873? by MunchMunch · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Now hold on--The article itself states that "Melvil Dewey created the most widely used library classification system in 1873."

    Anything from before the 1920s should be in the public domain, even if nothing after that will ever go into the public domain. I mean, was there indeed some perpetual copyright clause slipped into some bill or another? How could anybody otherwise still own the rights to this?

    1. Re:Created in 1873? by annodomini · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's copyright you're thinking of. According to the article, they are suing for trademark infringement. Trademarks are perpetual; they last forever, as long as you don't allow them to be diluted. That's why companies like Warner Brothers sue their fans for having websites with Harry Potter in their domain name. They don't want there to be a chance of their trademark being diluted to the point where they no longer have control over it.

    2. Re:Created in 1873? by MunchMunch · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I have a lot to learn.

      I found a convenient explanation (if anyone's interested) of trademark law, and you're indeed right.

      So-- the criteria to bypass trademark infringement seems to be the separation between descriptive and proper-name style usage. (The link uses "All Bran" as a protected trademark, but "all bran" as a description is not infringing.) It certainly doesn't satisfy the 'generic' provision, because you don't call systems of organization "Dewey Decimal Systems" in the same way you call jeans "Levis."

      However! If indeed the name is the only trademarked problem here, why not simply use the same system and call it "The Louie Decimal System"?

    3. Re:Created in 1873? by Agthorr · · Score: 1

      Because new books have been published and added to the system since then. The article points this out.

    4. Re:Created in 1873? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Trademarks are actually good. It ensures that when you buy a big mac, you know you are getting a cheap piece of meat which may have some beef in it, a dolop of saliva, and service without a smile. Trademarks are there for consumer protection as much as anything.

    5. Re:Created in 1873? by WoTG · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the article (gasp!), but other have commented that this is a trademark issue.

      But just for reference, copywrite laws vary a lot by country. In many countries of the old Common Wealth, like Canada, copywrite expires 50 years after the death of the author. Many books from the 1920's don't qualify for expiry of copywrite under this rule. Also, the copywrite in the US would be specific to the edition that was published before 1920ish. So, any newer revisions that include new sub-classifications for things like computers, genetics, nuclear science, etc. would still be covered by copywrite.

      I don't know how different a "new" edition is from a pre-1920ish version... but I suspect it's quite substantial.

  32. How is this NOT public domain? by JayBlalock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not being some sort of commu-terrorist, I'm trying to figure this out. The Dewey system was invented in the 1870s. It's something around 130 years old. How can it POSSIBLY still have its rights tied up? I thought until around 1930 our Congress was still rational enough to see that having things going to the Public Domain was a good thing.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:How is this NOT public domain? by sgb235 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The rights to it were bought by SCO.

  33. library hotel by ibmman85 · · Score: 4, Funny

    i like the erotica package detailed on their site.. sounds pretty good.. i dont think my girlfriend's parents would too much approve of us utilizing such facilities though and it probably costs more than the $2 that belongs to me. college. blah.

  34. Why not use the LC system? by Wohali · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My alma mater uses the Library of Congress system for numbering its books. Sure, it's not quite as simple for children to understand (a letter code, followed by numbers, then more letters), and is copyrighted, but as far as I know it's royalty-free to use.

    --
    "But always she's the spectre of uncertainty I first endured, then faded, then embraced..."
    1. Re:Why not use the LC system? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      My alma mater uses the Library of Congress system for numbering its books.

      Gee, when I was at Yale they were using their own classification system in many of the archives. Seems that the Yale library was founded before the LOC system or Dewey Decimal systems were invented, so they had to make up their own.

      Personally I think the LOC system is the best, though.

    2. Re:Why not use the LC system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do the libraries of universities wich reject morons named George Bush.

    3. Re:Why not use the LC system? by Vengie · · Score: 1

      thats because with sixteen fricking million volumes, i'd be in the stacks for FIVE hours instead of FOUR because i misread 110.1 as 101.1 or something equally perverse. Its bad enough as it is to have to walk to MUDD and then be told "Oops, those books have been moved to kline/SML/CCL/what have you" what would they do, organize the floors of sterling by the hundreds? I admit, the current setup in CCL is a bit archaic [all the weenie bins are in the R and S sections...] but still.....LOC is better than dewey or anything else.
      and btw, year/college? ;)

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    4. Re:Why not use the LC system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit man, you're attending Yale, why not just hire a servant to get your books for you?

      I'm sure you can hire a negro or mexican to get your books for you.

  35. This is going to destroy the hotel business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That and the $10,000/year in license fees paid to the Mint family for the right to put a chocolate on your pillow.

  36. or maybe... by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 1

    ...you didn't read the article? they did send a couple of letters over a period of years.

    dumbass.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  37. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had the same reaction.

    If the Dewey Decimal system is copyrighted, the copyright should have expired.

    If it's patented, it should have expired.

    And if it's trademarked, there shouldn't be any problem, since they don't call themselves the "Dewey Decimal Hotel."

  38. Even though the Dewey Decimal system is the most counterintuitive and idiotic system in the world. Seriously, any time I go to a library (which used to be a lot since during high school my bus dropped me off at the library about ten miles from my house, until i could drive to school and then I moved away to college). If I needed to research something I would look through the subject on the search computers (which were ancient but they worked and they had all the books in there categorized). Then I would scratch my head at the Dewey Numbers, and go down the aisle and look through the alphabetical by author organization and find the book.

    Seriously, that system is utterly useless beyond the overall categories it places books into, and even those are inelegant and I'm pretty sure tha tmy library (MIddleboro Public) breaks them up ijnto liitle bits, like European History, further from the Broad Dewey system categories.

    That's really all that needs to be done, post up some stickers that show what the subject of the book is on a given set of shelves, and throw them in alphabetically by author, maybe give them a UPC and number those roughly in order, based on the library's preference.

    1. Re:Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously, any time I go to a library (which used to be a lot since during high school my bus dropped me off at the library about ten miles from my house, until i could drive to school and then I moved away to college).

      Why would anyone go to the library anymore when you have the Interweb? You can search for stuff much easier online and order any books you need from Amazon. Libraries are outdated and should be done away with in this modern age of sensitive intellectual property rights. I'm sure book publishers and the RIAA would love to see libraries cease to exist so people would stop stealing their material by reading/listening to it and not paying for it.

    2. Re:Crap by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Surely the point of the DDS is simply that books are arranged in a consistent order, and books on the same topic are next to each other. You're not meant to try to work out the number. You look up the book you're after in a file card system, or on a computer. This gives a Dewey Decimal number. You can then find the books with that number on the shelves fairly simply using a simple search. That's all it does, and it does it adequately.

      Of course, the LoC system is a lot more logical (it doesn't stick books on computers next to books on parapsychology, for example). Switching does mean reclassifying and resorting every single book in a library though.

    3. Re:Crap by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

      Because you can get things at the library for free, you can find things that are quite entertaining by total accident. And it's overall a rather pleasant experience.

      The internet has really only been effective at delivering pornography and as a place for people to bitch and sound off about what they think about various subjects (such as libraries). It has yet to become a reasonable ammalgamation of the whole of human knowledge that comes within a more convineien tform than your local library.

      Also, the laws regarding the lending policies of libraries in regards to the books and intellectual peroperties they provide for public consumption are typically very clear and fall in favor of libraries. I feel that as institutions they are hardly outdated at all, because free is good.

    4. Re:Crap by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      You're not meant to try to work out the number.
      Funny,I remember being taught the ten major classifications in elementary school (I've forgotten them since then, as the LoC system is far more useful to me.) Many libraries post (on the stacks) the minor classifications as well, so that an individual who wants to find astronomy information can just browse "520" section,

    5. Re:Crap by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Okay, maybe you are supposed to use it that way... No idea why. It doesn't work too well if you do. Fine for grouping similar books for indexing though.

    6. Re:Crap by jrp2 · · Score: 1

      I feel that as institutions they are hardly outdated at all, because free is good.

      Free? You must still be a student. I have this sizable line item on my very large property tax bill titled "Library District". Not free at all. If you rent, you are paying it indirectly through your landlord's tax bill. Same goes for school libraries, it is a sizable part of your tuition and/or the taxes paid for school subsidies.

      Not to dilute your point though, it is a tax I have no problem with. Though I don't visit the library much, I did as a child and I am glad it is there for others (and me when I want it).

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
  39. To sue or not to sue by maizena · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cannot understand why american companies are in this suing fury about copyright/trademark infringement.

    It is really sad to see the world of business going this way.

    They should try to look at it from a new angle and see the benefits they could have in a joint venture or by adopting a new business model.

    1. Re:To sue or not to sue by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I cannot understand why american companies are in this suing fury about copyright/trademark infringement.

      There is nothing new going on here, except slashdot is publicizing it. In particular trademarks MUST be protected by the company owning them, or they will lose them.

  40. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by IM6100 · · Score: 1

    Tell that to the online sex toys site selling the 'Altivec' butt plugs.

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  41. How did they pick the damages??? by openbear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How on Earth did they pick the damages amount for this case?

    From the CNN story ...

    "The complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Columbus seeks triple the hotel's profits since its opening or triple the organization's damages, whichever is greater, from the hotel's owner."

    "Dreitler said Saturday he and his client do not yet know the size of the hotel's profits. The center, based in Dublin, is willing to settle with the hotel's owners, he said."
    If this does not scream frivolous lawsuit (or lottery ticket lawsuit) then I don't know what does. I thought if you were suing someone for "damages" that you had pick an amount, not just claim "triple whatever is going to get me the most money".

    This is more proof that the legal system in the US is severely broken and abused.

    1. Re:How did they pick the damages??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know.. in some countries a lot of scriptkiddie/network harassment/hacking cases never make it to the court because the victim usually pulls the amount damages from his ass(and so if the cracker denies everything the case starts to suddenly look that it is not going to make it through the court and so gets dropped, why doesn't make it through? because the damages are a fantasy number and therefore it is unjust to use them as basis of judgement and people are innocent until proven guilty in court of law).

    2. Re:How did they pick the damages??? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      This is more proof that the legal system in the US is severely broken and abused.

      Well, they haven't won yet. All they've done is file the complaint.

    3. Re:How did they pick the damages??? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      After RTFAing, I got the impression that this outfit wants to wind up *owning* the hotel, maybe out of some PHB notion that it would make a good promotional property. I did NOT get the impression they're seriously interested in settling for a reasonable penalty (such as triple the amount of back *licenses* "owed").

      This sort of legal thuggery, er, breakage does seem to have become popular, tho. Frex, I know someone who, under the assorted DMCA provisions, is suing some online article database (commonly distributed to public libraries) for all POSSIBLE infringements. That is, instead of a reasonable "treble damages for ACTUAL infringed copies" (that is, for individual viewings of his material which really happened -- it's logged, so this number could be extracted), he wants damages for every person who POSSIBLY EVER *COULD* view his article (that comes to some 46 MILLION library patrons). Which is insane, but all too much the current legal mindset. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  42. Oh good grief by SolemnDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I spent three years working in a library and learning the dewey decimal system. Three guesses how my home media are organised. (No, not by Soviet Russia or by Natalie Portman, who let you guys in here, anyway?) By dewey decimal, of course. And now i have to think about how much i really want to keep this system... i don't hold with the idea of having to license something so overwhelmingly widely used. (and i wasn't aware that our library paid a license fee. (In fact, i don't remember that in our expenses at all, which makes me wonder whether it fell under 'miscellaneous,' or whether our relatively-new library simply failed to bother...) either way, i feel that the system should be free (as in beer) because it's... a filing system used primarily by nonprofit entities, and of course that's only my fond wish, but i'm hoping that the next system will be free. Otherwise- Hold on while i go patent the alphabet as a filing system. And copyright it. Every keyboard company will be paying me money... heh heh heh....

    oke. Back to subject. This leads me to the next question. How much sense does it make to make libraries pay for one more thing? And will the next step be to raise this license fee? Most libraries are struggling along as it is, so i hope not. There isn't enough storage and there isn't enough funding, and it drives me crazy to see book sales held sometimes, in those cases where it's just because there's no way to maintain the full shelves.

    Let me rephrase this. Most libraries are non-profit entities. Five bucks a year isn't a lot of money, but it's money being charged for a standard system that would take a lot of time and effort to shift away from. Maybe derivative works should be allowed; if a hotel is using it for anything other than books, maybe it should be hailed as an innovative way to make people more aware of the system itself. But i'm willing to accept that the system 'owners' may have the legal right to collect... it's the obsessive nature of this particular instance that bothers me. *shrug* i could be way off-base.

    So... the most important point here, i think, is: What's a better way? And how can we make it free to libraries and other non-profits?

    1. Re:Oh good grief by Meowing · · Score: 4, Informative
      and i wasn't aware that our library paid a license fee. (In fact, i don't remember that in our expenses at all, which makes me wonder whether it fell under 'miscellaneous,' or whether our relatively-new library simply failed to bother...)

      It's sort of a hidden fee. The DDC book costs about $400, new edition every 3 years or so.

      Note though, that the hotel isn't being sued for using the classification system, but for infringing on the Dewey trademark for commercial purposes.

    2. Re:Oh good grief by LakeSolon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Am I the only one who is actually annoyed by unmatched parenthesis in slashdot posts?

      We need a moderation of "Syntax Error: Unmatched ')'".

      ~Lake ... too much Lisp.

    3. Re:Oh good grief by satyap · · Score: 1

      I find the LOC confusing. I bet the people who find DDC confusing are the same people who cannot handle SI units.

      Oh, I'd just like to add: Ook!

    4. Re:Oh good grief by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      I can handle the DDC just fine, I just think it is weird. Computer books are scattered through several different sections, as are a lot of other technical books. Books about pseudoscience are freely mixed with books debunking pseudoscience. Plus, our libraries can't figure out what books are science fiction, mystery, or general fiction. Sometimes even books in series by the same author are mixed between these sections.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    5. Re:Oh good grief by babbage · · Score: 1
      Hold on while i go patent the alphabet as a filing system. And copyright it. Every keyboard company will be paying me money... heh heh heh....

      Luckily for the keyboard companies, they had the foresight to agree on an arrangement that is not actually in alphabetical order -- take that, profiteers! heh heh heh... :-)

    6. Re:Oh good grief by TomV · · Score: 1

      All the big categories in the hierarchy are a century old. So the poor old thing gets a bit muddled when you ask her to handle broad concepts that didn't even exist when she was born. She's the elderly granny of the Library world, but we still love the old dear.

      tomV

    7. Re:Oh good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes you are)

  43. it will never end. by deft · · Score: 1

    "dear dewey guys"

    we have immediately stopped using your system... but much to our horror and dismay, people keep putting the books right back where they got them from. if you would like us to mess em up a bit, let us know.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  44. This is absurd. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even if the complaint was reasonable, the damages being sought are beyond absurd. Triple the profits the hotel has made since it opened? First, I can't imagine how the OCLC was damaged beyond the loss of revenue they would have gotten from a license. Second, I can't imagine that every cent of profit the hotel made over the last three years was a direct result of their use of the Dewey Decimal system. Perhaps some of it came from, I dunno, being conveniently placed in the middle of New York?

    It would only make sense that they should have to prove that every customer who stayed there wouldn't have were it not for their use of the Dewey Decimal system.

    It sounds like this non-profit actually serves a useful purpose, but I really hope that if this goes to court, their damages get capped at around $4500 (triple the money the hotel saved by not buying a license).

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:This is absurd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Every lawsuit asks for absurd amounts of money. It's like negotiating; you don't start by telling them exactly what you want. The courts will decide what's apropriate.

    2. Re:This is absurd. by HBI · · Score: 1

      I have a better one. When you think of the Dewey Decimal System, do you think of OCLC? If not, is it a valid trademark?

      Something for the lawyers on the hotel's side to think on.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:This is absurd. by belroth · · Score: 1

      It's a wake up call - after a few ignored letters saying "You're(Ab)using our trademark" the OCLC seems to have decided to shout a little louder.
      It's a trademark thing, so they have to 'use it or lose it'.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    4. Re:This is absurd. by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Just because you don't associate the trademark with the owner doesn't mean the trademark is invalid.

      For example, when you think of Slashdot, you don't immediately think of BlockStackers Inc, the registered owner of the typed word "Slashdot", for use in news and public commentary. (Registered US trademark # 2359584)

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  45. A better history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I found this history of the DDS at A History of the Dewey Decimal System

    I found this line most interesting: He originated the DDC in 1873 and had it published and patented in 1876.

    Doesn't that mean that it should now be in the public domain since the patent has expired?

    1. Re:A better history by Leffe · · Score: 1

      You can unfortunately repatent them, a patent only lasts 20 or 30 years. Or something like that.

    2. Re:A better history by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the point is that anything invented 130 years ago by someone who died 72 years ago damn well ought to be in the public domain by now, and the fact that it's not is a shining example of why drastic overhaul of so much IP law is desperately needed.

    3. Re:A better history by Beowabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a trademark infringement case, not patent or copyright. Assuming that's the only issue, OCLC is not complaining that the hotel uses certain ranges of numbers to classify books (that would be patent infringement, but as the parent points out the patent would long since have expired), but that the hotel uses a trademarked term with Dewey in it in their advertising and promotion -- in effect, that they're making a profit off of OCLC's "brand". If I'm understanding this correctly, there would be no problem if the Library Hotel had used the same numbers with the same meanings, but had referred to it throughout as the Library Hotel Classification System or something like that. (They'd probably even have been fine if they'd said that it was "similar to the Dewey Decimal classification system. Dewey Decimal is a trademark of OCLC.")

      Yes, it still seems kind of silly, but it's not the gross abuse of IP law or the ridiculous state of affairs that lots of respondents are taking it for. It's more as if I opened the Soup Hotel, and named all the floors after trademarked Campbell's Soup brand names. I'd be fine if I named the floors "Chicken and Rice" and "Beef Stew", but if I named them "Campbell's Mega Noodle" and "Campbell's Chicken & Stars" and used promotional material that talked about all the soup flavours you grew up with, and service as good as the soup you love, and that sort of thing, then you can bet Campbell's Soup would come after me if I didn't have a licensing agreement with them, because I'm profiting off of their trademark.

      In fact, the fact that OCLC tried a couple of times to contact the hotel before pursuing legal action makes me think that they may mostly care about this because they don't want to lose the trademark (which can happen if you don't defend it and people start using it generically).

    4. Re:A better history by TomV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh, but DDC1, published 130 years ago by someone who died 72 years ago, is in the public domain now.

      It's pretty useless if you want to classify 20th century history, or airplanes, or cars or computers. Relativity and Quantum, just where exactly in Physics should those go?

      DDC22, on the other hand, is latest, fairly-up-to-date product of immense amounts of hard (and it must be said mind-blowingly boring) work by dedicated specialists who classified 110,000 new items last year, and will no doubt have to classify even more this year, and more the year after. Nobody's stopping you from using the 'invention' (a hierarchical classification scheme using numeric indicators), it's just the trademark and the copyrighted content of the Dewey implementation of this invention that's protected.

      AFAIK, anything in a hundred year old Britannica is out of copyright, as are many early versions of Dewey. But the world moves on. And in the absence of de facto standards like DDC or LOC, every library would have to classify every new accession from first principles (as I say, both specialised, and mind-damagingly dull work), and there wouldn't be any consistency between libraries, which is a useful collateral bonus of the big schemes.

      tomV

    5. Re:A better history by JonBuck · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a librarian-in-training, I think I should note that the DDC system isn't static. It's currently in its 21st revision (with 22 coming out soon). Because of this, the copyrights are still valid. It's a work-in-progress. It needs to change to accomodate the changing world of information.

    6. Re:A better history by jfern · · Score: 1

      > Speaking as a librarian-in-training, I think I should note that the DDC system isn't static. It's currently in its 21st revision (with 22 coming out soon). Because of this, the copyrights are still valid. It's a work-in-progress. It needs to change to accomodate the changing world of information.

      What if they switch to using an old version? At the top level, probably not much as changed.

    7. Re:A better history by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Your post suggests that it is a copyright suit, but it is a trademark suit. Yes, the original numbering systems have passed into the public domain, but the tradmarks have not expired.

      I never knew so many /. posters were so ignorant of trademark, service marks, patants, and copyright distinctions. OCLC's law suit is the right action for them to take, if you understand the way the laws work.

      • Trademark & service marks = ownership of a particular mark for a particular usage in a particular domain which can be renewed as long as the mark is in use, to prevent a group's name from being tarnished by shoddy companies.
      • Patants = limited monopolies on the use of a method, to ensure that inventors have time to transform ideas into marketable (and profitable) products.
      • Copyrights = (supposedly) limited term restrictions on reproduction of any recorded information, to allow authors and artists to collect royalties.

      They can claim trademark violations because the hotel is using the marks owned by OCLC without permission. It would be like some no-name snack company naming their products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs". Now I'm off to paste this to all the others who don't bother to understand the law before spouting off about how bad it is.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    8. Re:A better history by kuroth · · Score: 1

      (Which one of you fucktards moderated this up as "insightful"?)

      Read the article. Christ, read the freaking four-sentence blurb. Pay careful attention to the words "for trademark infringement". A trademark is not copyright, and trademark is not a patent. As long as you play by the trademark rules, a trademark is forever. It does not expire, it does not lapse, it does not go into the public domain.

    9. Re:A better history by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

      It's not just about the system. It's about the work of classifying books into the categories and coming up with new categories. That takes effort, you know.

      Furthermore, this is about trademark infringements. Trademarks last as long as you pay the fees for.

      Just for comparision, a certain dark-coloured caffineated beverage was first patented and trademarked in 1887, but I don't see anyone saying that the recipe for the original CocaCola should be made public, or the current one (which was settled down in the 1920s).

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    10. Re:A better history by stilleon · · Score: 1

      I believe the system IS public domain, but the term "Dewey Decimal System" is a trademark. They are using that term to advertise. They probably could have got away with using the system ut calling it "the Generic Library Organizing System." That would be legal, I think. Trademarks do not bcome public domain.

    11. Re:A better history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just for comparision, a certain dark-coloured caffineated beverage was first patented and trademarked in 1887, but I don't see anyone saying that the recipe for the original CocaCola should be made public, or the current one (which was settled down in the 1920s).

      Well, fuck that shit -- I'll say it. However, it's a different situation -- the recipe is not under patent, it's a trade secret. For as long as they keep it secret.

    12. Re:A better history by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      You're right; it is indeed about trademarks, not copyright or patents, and I wasn't clearly thinking about that in all my previous posts in this thread. I did read the article, but I didn't make all the distinctions I should have.

      That said, I think it still stands. The Dewey Decimal System refers to a hierarchical filing system for books in libraries, and was apparently devised without any intent of anything pertaining to it being proprietary, and as such I think it's a damn shame an individual organization owns it and can extract royalties (and damages, in cases of "infringement") for use of the name. It's simply ridiculous that anything of such basic utility to the general public, and consisting of simply a name and a practice associated with it, be beholden to some private company even after 130 years. Yes, I'm aware the company actually goes through many thousands of books each year to assign DD numbers to them and otherwise invests a lot in maintaining the DD system, and as such needs some source of compensation for its efforts, but surely there can be some better way of doing things than this, can't there?

    13. Re:A better history by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

      Well, it's highly likely the original recipe (the one with the cocaine in it) has already been leaked; certainly, there is a contender for it.

      But you couldn't sell the beverage as CocaCola if you wanted to, because of the trademark. In the same way, you can't use the Dewey Decimal System and call it that (the way the hotel in question did) because of the trademark.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    14. Re:A better history by TomV · · Score: 1
      Your post suggests that it is a copyright suit, but it is a trademark suit.

      Oh, certainly the OCLC - Library Hotel case described in the Article concerns a Trademark dispute, and certainly there would be a significantly smaller number of posts here on /. if the population could get its head around the distinction between TM (c) and Pat.

      However, I was attempting (perhaps misguidedly, in view of the overwhelming confusion between these distinct forms of protection, but anyway...) to provide a response to the specific comment:
      I think the point is that anything invented 130 years ago by someone who died 72 years ago damn well ought to be in the public domain by now
      because there seemed to be a misapprehension that the DDC had been set in stone 130 years ago, which rather failed to give any credit for the ongoing work on the scheme.

      tomV

  46. Text at Bottom of Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the text at the bottom of the page?

    u can ask for the defendant's profits, our view is since we have written to these people three different times, it was certainly intentional and it was certainly

    we have no way of knowing until the discovery takes place how much their profits are

    Doesn't exactly sound professional does it?

  47. Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm curious about what you suggest as a replacement.

    Is it the age of the system that bothers you, or are there specific flaws in Dewey's approach that you think should be addressed?

    1. Re:Alternatives? by oscitant · · Score: 1

      Library of Congress call number for normal stuff; Sudoc numbers for gov't publications.

  48. MOD UP +5 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all. Thankyou.

  49. Sue'ing Crazy by nite87 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is just another example of people with money sue'ing other people for money. Whats next, the RAII sueing a 12 year old girl....oh, wait.

  50. Obligatory Futurama Quote: by Lyrrad · · Score: 1

    "Pathetic human race. Arranging their knowledge by category just made it easier to absorb. Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!"

    -The Big Brain

  51. 500 Dollars per YEAR??? by Denver_80203 · · Score: 1

    Oh Crap... I had better find a new way to organize my MP3s!

  52. More like the "screw" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in "You have been"

  53. Let 'em know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell them what you think about suing over a classification system developed over a century ago at webinput.oclc.org. Shame that non-profit profiteering is eroding respect for the library profession.

    1. Re:Let 'em know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your mailto is wrong. It should be webinput@oclc.org.

      ~~~

  54. It's a Trademark infringement case. by ExRex · · Score: 4, Informative

    The suit is for trademark infringement, not copyright or patent infringement.

    In the U.S. Trademark rights can be held indefinitely by the registrant, or it's successors in interest as in this case, with timely filing of required paperwork and paying of appropriate fees.

    What I find amusing is that the designer's of the hotel clearly did not do their homework. The research branch of the New York Public Library doesn't even use the Dewey system. It uses the Library of Congress categories. Here's the NYPL's online catalog. I guess the designer's went into the Library to look at the architecture, but didn't actually bother to call for a book, or even check the catalog. Had they, they wouldn't be in this pickle.

    --
    The closer you are to the code, the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb
    1. Re:It's a Trademark infringement case. by AlgoRhythm · · Score: 1

      Hmm, IANAL, so could anyone clarify the grounds of infringement? I thought that trademark claims usually involved companies in the same or similar markets, and that there had to be proof that the infringer could be mistaken for actual holder (or cost them money because of the confusion). How many of you would mistake someone selling a room for a night with a way of categorizing library books?

      I wonder if the Hotel's lawyers already thought about this, and so ignored the letters from the DDS people.

    2. Re:It's a Trademark infringement case. by ExRex · · Score: 1

      While the OCLC may not have a real cause of action, that doesn't prevent them from bringing suit. As long as they've got the registration they can initiate a suit, though the judge might chuck it out on first hearing.
      Or it may be judged that the trademark has devolved into a common usage and is no longer protected, but that would be a decision the court would make after hearing arguments.
      As to the damages, lawyers always suggest you ask for way more than you can actually get. Gives them room to haggle when discussing a settlement.

      --
      The closer you are to the code, the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb
  55. Why the shock? by fname · · Score: 1

    I had no idea Dewey Decimal system was copyrighted. I also have no opinion on this lawsuit. However, I don't understand the outrage being directed at the maintainers of the system for charging to maintain it. I bet it takes money to maintain the Dewey Decimal system. Libraries benefit from Dewey. Ergo, libraries should pay to maintain it. Am I missing something? $500 is not a lot of money for just about any library.

    Who do you suggest pay to maintain the system and catlog the works-- a governmnet entity, or maybe a self-organized group of volunteers. Seems the system works well, and provides a good value for the customers. How else would libraries organize their books-- alphabetically by author, ISBN number, or self-catalog every item that comes in? How much staff time would be spent cataloging each book. If it took 1 staff person 2 hours a week, that would cost a least double the current $500/year. For most libraries, it would take much more effort.

    DDS offers a valuable service; why the outrage at collecting fees for that service?

    1. Re:Why the shock? by ephraimhorse · · Score: 1
      > DDS offers a valuable service; why the outrage at collecting fees for that service?

      Well, a classification "service" for a system used in public libraries can be reasonably considered as part of basic infrastructure. As such, it should not be private because we (the people) expose ourself to a rip-off. One would expect that a publically-funded organization (a university?) does the maintanance work and does not charge the end user.

    2. Re:Why the shock? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      I had no idea Dewey Decimal system was copyrighted
      The lawsuit is about a trademark, not a copyright.

      As an analogy, Twinkies and Ding-Dongs are trademarked names. If you started selling creme-filled yellow sponges and creme-filled chocolate cakes, you are within your rights. If you called them Twinkies and Ding-Dongs, you would be in violation of various trademark laws. The Hotel is using trademarked names without permission of the trademark owner. It is a simple case, and if it ever gets to court (which I doubt) the hotel would have a very tough time convincing the judge that they don't use the trademarks improperly.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    3. Re:Why the shock? by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      Um I don't know about some of those "other" libraries. But most public libraries in less than giant cities have low enough funding that $500 would be a signigicant amount of money. I have worked at a library both as an employee and as a volunteer and the lack of funding is blatently apparent.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    4. Re:Why the shock? by fname · · Score: 1

      OK, so then who are the maintainers of the system answerable to-- whoever pays the bill, right? While there's always the possibility of a political bias creeping into the system, I think the best way to prevent is by having the stakeholders run the system. The libraries pay the bill, the libraries are ultimately going to be the ones in control.

  56. Interesting thing about this lawsuit .... by anagama · · Score: 1


    If you read the article you will see it was filed by Frank Chetum of the law firm:

    Dewey, Chetum & Howe, PLLC

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  57. Amazing level of greed by mc6809e · · Score: 1

    The problem with this suit is that the people who maintain and add to the system are almost all employed by publicly funded institutions and are public employees.

    They already get paid through taxes for this work.

    They're trying to double dip here.

  58. Fantastic publicity by FTL · · Score: 1
    You can't buy publicity like this. Here we have a small hotel who have managed to get world-wide publicity for whatever it will cost to settle this suit.

    How many of us had heard of this hotel before today? Not only do they have publicity, but they have good publicity -- they're the 'victim'. Doesn't get any better than this.

    (I wonder how willing a bank would be to offer a business a short term loan to cover legal expenses in light of the future increase in business.)

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  59. ATTENTION FELLOW SLASHDOTTERS! by ShadowRage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would like to formally announce that I, hold the patent on "online posting". I will be fair to protect my rights, that's why if you get your internet license from me, you will be endowed with the legal rights to post online, for a small fee of 700 dollars per website, I know this seems unfair, but I hold the rights, no matter what, I must protect my property at all costs.
    For those thieves who are illegally using my property, I will have my allies from the RIAA find you and build up a case, I'm sorry, but that's just not how thins work in america, you dont start stealing others' property. I feel this is fair and that the average person is dishonest about the amount of money they get, they get loads of money! minimum wage is just too high these days!
    anyways, I bid you adieu and I plan to see money in my offshore bank account soon.

    (btw, for those who didnt get it, it's a JOKE)

  60. I'm with you 99%. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Why is there a space between the 'r' and 'o'?)

    To prevent page-widening comments.

  61. Random stuff about the DDC system by Cryptonom · · Score: 2, Informative

    One reson that the DDC hasn't entered the Public Doman yet is that the ownrs kep puting out a new "verzon" every year or so. This is necesary from a clasification standpoint in that new things are neding to be clasified (in Dewey's day, it was a bit hard to imagin computer softwar neding to be put in a library). But it does mean that every tim a new version is published, it is given a seperat copyrit (since the content realy is diferent). A rough overview of the system can be sen her: http://www.tnrdlib.bc.ca/dewey.html Dewey was also a proponent of simplified speling: http://www.milton.k12.nh.us/Nute/melvil_dewey.htm# toc

    1. Re:Random stuff about the DDC system by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      What is with all the spelling errors?

  62. LOC? by sootman · · Score: 2, Informative

    At my college (CSU, Chico) the library uses the Library of Congress system. Anyone know if that is free? If it originated with the taxpayer-supported US Gov, I would think it should be free.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  63. Browser Resizing by pete-classic · · Score: 0

    In related news, I'll be suing the Library Hotel for resizing my god-damned browser window without express, written permission.

    Man that pisses me off.

    And it seems that Konq won't let me turn that off :-(

    -Peter

  64. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by XO · · Score: 1

    So, Linux, which was created in 1990, or thereabouts, will be public domain in 2090, or thereabouts?

    Wrong.

    The Dewey Decimal System is still maintained, and updated. 130 years later. And if Linux is still maintained and updated, 130 years from now, it will still not be public domain.

    Come on, people.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  65. Fing greedy pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just another example of the rich abusing the law to steal

  66. HOW can this be????? by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1
    "Melvil Dewey created the most widely used library classification system in 1873. Each of 10 main categories, such as social sciences, mathematics or the arts, has thousands of subcategories, designated by decimal points.

    This Dewey decimal system is 130 years old! HOW IN HELL is trhere still a valid copyright on something THAT old??

    This is INSANE!!!!
    1. Re:HOW can this be????? by praksys · · Score: 1

      Trademarks don't expire after a set period of time (although they can be lost in various ways).

    2. Re:HOW can this be????? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      HOW IN HELL is trhere still a valid copyright on something THAT old??

      Read the article dumbass. This is a trademark infringement case where the Hotel is using the "Dewey Decimal System" name without permission. The suit has nothing to do with copyrights.

  67. Assign Object IDentifiers to the categories by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    No? Chop off the root and you'd have something very similar to the Dewey Decimal system but not.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  68. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The Dewey Decimal System is still maintained, and
    > updated. 130 years later.

    Which doesn't have anything to do with the status of the 130 year old system. Their additions don't enter public domain but the rest did.

    > Linux is still maintained and updated, 130 years
    > from now, it will still not be public domain

    The version that is released 130 years from now won't but the 1991 version will--unless Disney keeps getting laws pushed through Congress.

  69. Tradmark law. by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

    Notice this question the report starts with? "Did you know the Dewey Decimal System isn't in the public domain?"

    If the public thinks dewey is public then the trademark suit fails. In order to have a valid trademark it has to be recognized in trade. Essentially the same thing happened to unix, although AT&T basically just gave up rather than continuing to press the issue. (I make a point of never capitalizing unix except at the beginning of a sentence.)

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    1. Re:Tradmark law. by man_ls · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to capitalize Unix because it is a proper name of an operating system.

      Would you rather me not ever capitalize linux for the same reason you don't capitalize Unix?

    2. Re:Tradmark law. by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

      No, unix is a common noun.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  70. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The version of linux that was released at that time will be in the public domain. Adding "Really The End" to a book will not prevent the original book form returning to the beautiful compost of public domain.

  71. Re:What do you expect by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 0

    That someone actually modded this flaming troll "Insightful" is just pathetic. What the hell was this mod thinking??

  72. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you don't know a good butt plug until you've had a vectorized one.

  73. DDC is overrated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why the fuss over this thing. It's not really that great of a "discovery". Any idiot with organizational potential could come up with an easy way to organize books.

    Not to mention the entire system is gaudy and pointless.

  74. Colon classification by rsidd · · Score: 1

    Colon classification (faceted analysis) has never been widely used in libraries (except in India) but has influenced a lot of other work in information sciences. Perhaps it's time to bring it into libraries, for which it was originally designed. It is far better than Dewey or LOC but those systems were better entrenched.

  75. I wonder by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Have the OCLC's lawyers heard of the Wikipedia's version of the Dewey Decimal System yet.

  76. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

    And if it's trademarked, there shouldn't be any problem, since they don't call themselves the "Dewey Decimal Hotel."

    It's trademarked, and there is a problem because they are using the Dewey Decimal System name in their advertising without permission.

  77. I Used to Work for OCLC by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

    I obviously can't speak for them, but I can provide some background on what they do. OCLC is a nonprofit org providing services for approx 45,000 libraries around the world. If you are a librarian and need to figure out how to catalog a new book in your collection, you go to OCLC to see how others have done it. Ever needed an item that wasn't in your library? OCLC handles the system for arranging inter-library loans. They do a fair amount of original research for libraries and they even open source some of the results. PURL is another OCLC project that some of you may be familiar with. The Dublin Core MetaData Initiative was co-founded by a researcher who got his start at OCLC and is now running the W3C's Symantic Web Initiaitve. OCLC is very well known and respected in the library community.

    Library budgets the world over are under attack given the current economic situation. This leaves less and less money available for building the kind of common infrastructure that will help libraries continue to provide new and relevant services for their patrons as more and more of the content becomes digital. OCLC certainly has both the right and the need to defend the Dewey Decimal Trademarks from infringers.

    1. Re:I Used to Work for OCLC by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Ever needed an item that wasn't in your library? OCLC handles the system for arranging inter-library loans.

      You could have fooled me. Around here, that function (and other related functions)is taken care of by the provincial governent. See information here.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:I Used to Work for OCLC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. The trademark has long since gone into the public domain since this company you worked for failed to have teachers notify students the world over that the Dewey Decimal System was a trademark. OCLO cannot get away with allowing the teaching to go on (and on and on) and then turn around and say, sorry, we have a trademark on that term you were forced to learn for 3rd grade library class. It just does not work that way. And any intellectual property attorney who is not being paid to look the other way will tell you just that. OCLC lost their trademark. A long, long time ago.

    3. Re:I Used to Work for OCLC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a lawyer or just playing one on /.?

    4. Re:I Used to Work for OCLC by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      How do they handle ILLs when they cross provincial boundries? Is a copy of every science journal ever printed available somewhere in Saskatchewan? Of course OCLC has competitors for many of its services -- Those upstarts at the LOC and the Bibliotheque nationale de France among them. But I doubt they worry too much about Saskatchewan.

  78. Standards must never become IP by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    This is a perfect example of why standards should never become intellectual property, and intellectual property must not be allowed to become a standard.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  79. Next thing you know... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    SCO will be claiming the Dewey Decimal Code wound up in the Linux kernal by way of some programmer at SGI...

    Yeah, I know, obligatory SCO reference... :)

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  80. And I use it for porn by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I use the system to organize my porn collection.

    Now I have to find a new way to sort my lesbians from the goat porn, and the senior citizens gone wild series.

    Blasted!

  81. Re:(for those who really didnt get it) by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (fuck you)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  82. Give the lawyers the Erotica suite... by malakai · · Score: 1
  83. contuing to be updated by Fubar411 · · Score: 1

    Iff the system were dead, then yes it should be public domain. But RTFA and you'll see the work is continuing to be updated as new fields of study arise.

    1. Re:contuing to be updated by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      new fields of study are always arising. so by your logic, the DDC will never be in the public domain as long as categories are added to it. By this logic, as long as someone uses/markets their invention, patent protection should be perpetual and the idea should never be public domain. I vehemently disagree.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  84. 130 year old patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone hold a patent for something invented in 1873? Or was that year a typo? (yes, I am completely ignorant about who Dewey was)

    1. Re:130 year old patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trademark, not patent ... but it still sounds awful silly to me.

  85. Re:John Dewey was a bad guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mod parent down as -1 ignorant.

    DDC was devised by Melvil Dewey.

    They're letting anyone in here these days...

  86. Isn't Unix a trademark itself? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

    After all, GNU is Not Unix.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

    1. Re:Isn't Unix a trademark itself? by Meowing · · Score: 1

      Open Group and Microsoft do have various cross licensing agreements, so somehow I'm sure they obtained the necessary permission (see the suit with Apple; Open Group aren't shy about this stuff). MS do seem to be going out of their way on this one too, given the product's clumsy name.

  87. No one is impressed that you went to Yale, shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow you went to a elitist bourgeois school! I'm so impressed! Shall I till ye fields me lord?

  88. Waste of tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I find out that my local library is paying my tax money and contributions to these people rather than spending the money on more books for kids or on underpaid library workers, I'm going to try and be a burr under their blanket. I know how to write letters to the editor of my local paper, and if enough folks read them and get irritated too, maybe we can do something about it.

  89. You could rememeber Dewey? by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


    You could remember all the Dewey categories?

    Are you an excellent driver? if so, you and me should hit Vegas and play some blackjack.

    T&K.

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    1. Re:You could rememeber Dewey? by TWX · · Score: 1

      I could well enough. I can't now, since it's been years since I've been to a Dewey library frequently, but I remember which of the hundred level categories the subjects fit into, and some of the categories specifically within. Not everything, but close enough that I could find what I needed by browsing titles after I found the right subsection.

      I believe that's the way it should be, in an intuitive catalogue.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  90. OOK by solprovider · · Score: 1

    OOK = Official Otherworldly Klassification

    Used by the KDE developers and mages on topside to classify everything. If you ask the librarian where a book is, he tells you to ook it up in the ook catalog. He abbreviates it to "Ook, OOK!"

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  91. Dewey Decimal? by twoslice · · Score: 1
    My mother-in-law calls a penis a dewey. Perhaps they are trying to sell penis enlargement pills that increases the size of your dewey by a decimal point?

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  92. Or it could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Just put the damn books on the shelf in order of author."

    Okay, try it. Try author = Williiam Smith. LOC lists 25 authors by that name. How do you want to put those in order so people can distinguish one William Smith from another William Smith?

    Some of those William Smiths have written several books. How do you want to put those in order on the shelves so people can find them?

    And about those books that William Smith contributed to were co-authored with other authors. How do you decide where those go?

    So, here you go to the library and do a free text search in the catalog and see that the library has the book by William Smith you are looking for. What then? You go to the William Smith aisle and scan the shelves of hundreds of books by various William Smiths until you spot the one you want? And if you don't see it, then you go look in the aisle for the co-author, because it might be shelved in that section, etc, etc?

    Any classification scheme is simply a tool for establishing a physical location. It really doesn't matter whether the scheme is faceted, decimal, alpha-numeric, whatever - as long as it can place an item in a particular position among millions of other physical items so you can retrieve it.

    There are those who suggest that all you need to do is assign an accession number to each item as it is put on the shelf. The first one gets accession number 000000000001, the next item is 000000000002, etc. After all, you can just search the electronic database, find the item, get the accession number, then retrieve the item. No problem. It would work.

    So why don't libraries do that? Well, libraries discovered that people like to browse. They find one book they are interested in, then when they get to the shelf, they like to scan the other books in the same area to see if any of those might be of interest too. Dewey and LOC and other classification schemes do that as a way of trying to assist their clientele.

    Yep, most books discuss a variety of interrelated topics, and you can only put it in one loacation. You may want to look at "Algorithms in C" because you are a mathematician, and may wonder why it is in the computer programming section. But (1) its greatest value may be to programmers, and (2) most books published in the past 20 years have included Cataloging In Publication - the subject headings and call numbers (both Dewey and LOC) are assigned by LOC before the book even goes to the printer. This has enabled libraries to speed up the processing of books, improve consistency and quality from one library to another, and cut way back on staff.

    Dewey is old. The subject categories are poor in some areas, including technology, because the system predates most modern advances. LOC is better. You usually find Dewey actively in use only in public libraries these days. Most university and research libraries have switched to LOC, although they may still have old collections using Dewey.

    You can consider the system antiquated or superfluous for your needs, but huge collections of physical items require organizing schemes for storing and locating.

    Recommending that they just be put on the shelf by author ain't a solution. Even dumbed-down bookstores find it necessary to use dumbed-down grouping schemes. But when you come up with something better, something that will work for millions of physical documents, they'll name it after you.

    1. Re:Or it could be worse by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      IIRC book in the French national library are shelved by size. The backdraw of course is that browsing is impossible. The shelves aren't accessible by public anyways. You give the catalog numbers at the desk and get the books one hour later... Seems the need to save space got more pressing than the need for public browsing.

      --
      bickerdyke
    2. Re:Or it could be worse by mpe · · Score: 1

      Okay, try it. Try author = Williiam Smith. LOC lists 25 authors by that name. How do you want to put those in order so people can distinguish one William Smith from another William Smith?

      What's to stop one or more of these authors also having been published as "Bill Smith". Or maybe the the one you want was only ever known to his publishers as "Bill".

  93. books versus machines by headonfire · · Score: 1

    obviously libraries and other institutions need to pay the poor, abused owners of this intellectual property right away.

    libraries, who have to beg for funding because there still aren't enough bombs in the world yet.

    libraries, who sell off stocks of books to pay expenses, because oops! your funding was appropriated to pay for a couple bolts on an F-16, or a toilet seat for a general.

    for the cost of just one Giant Hulking War-Machine(TM) - one advanced figher or bomber, one M1-A1 Abrams tank, do you realise how many public institutions could be revitalized? Christ, $300 million goes a long way when it's not used for blowing stuff up, you know that?

  94. How true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Dewey Decimal System...what a scam that was!" - Cosmo Kramer

  95. The Answer At Last by johnos · · Score: 1

    You know all those posts that have a variation on:

    1. Do Something
    2. ??? 3. Profit!

    Now I understand what step 2 is. Sue everyone.

    Seriously, though. The boneheads don't have a trademark for "Dewey Decimal" or "Dewey Decimal System" They have "Dewey" (one of a number of different "Dewey"s) and they have "Dewey Decimal Classification", but unless the Library Hotel was being promoted as the "Dewey Decimal Classification Libary Hotel" or "The Official Dewey Decimal Hotel" I don't see a case. And I am familiar with the need to police one's trademarks. This isn't about protecting a trademark because nobody at any time is going to be confused into thinking that the hotel has any relationship with the OCLC. Until this story ran, were there more than a few thousand in the US that even knew the organization existed?

  96. Dewey Decimal Copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to demonstrate my ignorance here, but my question is, if the DDS was originally conceived in 1863, why is it still under copyright? Don't these things ever expire?

  97. Case summary by danila · · Score: 3, Informative

    Initially I read the Slashdot comments only and was under the impression that the DDC's lawsuit may have some merit. But after visiting the hotel's site I was completely fucking outraged at the American IP legal climate...

    Here is what I found. The hotel uses something which very much resembles the original DDC classification, which is in public domain. As the site states, "Each of the ten guestroom floors of the Library is dedicated to one of the ten major categories of the Dewey Decimal System: Social Sciences, Literature, Languages, History, Math & Science, General Knowledge, Technology, Philosophy, The Arts and Religion. Each of the sixty exquisitely appointed accommodations have been individually adorned with a collection of art and books relevant to one distinctive topic within the category of floor it belongs to.".

    It's simply fucking insane that DDC is suing the hotel for that. I mean, WTF?! They claim trademark infridgement? They use the basic classification which is probably the same as original one, created 130 years ago and is now in public domain. If they use it, they are completely within their rights to call it "Dewey Decimal System" because that's what it is. And it's not like the hotel is in any competition with DDC. Nor any customers will be confused that the hotel is somehow affiliated with DDC. Stupid lawsuit and the whole concept of IP should be trashed. It's long overdue.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:Case summary by Frobnicator · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The hotel uses something which very much resembles the original DDC classification, which is in public domain. As the site states
      Good so far...
      They use the basic classification which is probably the same as original one, created 130 years ago and is now in public domain. If they use it, they are completely within their rights to call it "Dewey Decimal System" because that's what it is.
      Nope. The company OCLC owns a bunch of tradmarks on the Dewey Decimal Classification System as well as other names and phrases. Trademarks can be renewed as long as they are in use, and the DDCS has been in use and trademarked the entire time. As an exmple, you can start a company that makes creme-filled sponge cake and creme-filled chocolate cakes wrapped in tin foil. But you can't call those products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs", since those are trademarked. If you started calling them Twinkies and Ding-Dongs, you would need permission from the trademark owner, or they could (rightly) sue.

      In this case, the hotel is using a trademark of OCLC, and it is just as clear-cut as if you were to start selling Twinkies and Ding-Dongs.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re:Case summary by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In this case, the hotel is using a trademark of OCLC, and it is just as clear-cut as if you were to start selling Twinkies and Ding-Dongs.

      Yes, it's completely clear-cut. The hotel is totally within their rights to call the system by its name. If they sell Smirnoff vodka in their bar, they can call it "Smirnoff". If they have CNN showing on a TV in the hall they can call it "CNN". If they have XBoxes in rooms, they can call them "XBoxes". And if they happen to use DDC for classification, they have the right to clearly say that. They do not claim their own hotel is DDC-hotel. They just say, in very plain language, that for every major category in DDC there is a floor in the hotel and for every secondary one there is a room. If the Library hotel used a different system and called it DDC, I could see the merit in this case, but they clearly use the correct DDC and so "Dewey Decimal System" the only correct way to call it.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    3. Re:Case summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You?re an idiot. The lawsuit has NOTHING to do with what you rambled off. You have to quit regurgitating newsprint and actually try finding out about the case. It's about a trademark violation using a trademark. It has NOTHING to do with using the system. The System is public domain. The name, "Dewey Decimal System" is a trademark. Why is it that 90% of Slashdot readers take 6 minutes to read a post and somehow form an articulate argument based on fact.

      You quote:
      "It's simply fucking insane that DDC is suing the hotel for that. I mean, WTF?! They claim trademark infringement? They use the basic classification which is probably the same as original one, created 130 years ago and is now in public domain."

      First off the system isn't trademarked. You cannot trademark a system or process. I'm stunned how ?outraged" you are even though you know 0 about what is actually going on. Shut up please and save yourself more disgrace....

    4. Re:Case summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what I am writing about. Read this post.

      Dumbass.

  98. Someone PLEASE kill all the lawyers! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    This shit is insane.
    People are out of control with all this suing bullshit. I see that there are companies that are getting patents on DNA sequences. Next they will try to collect royalties from blue eyed people and suing those that won't pay.

    They'll force people with blue eyes to either get a license to pro-create children that MIGHT have blue eyes or to mate with people that can not produce children with blue eyes.

    And you can be damn sure that some liberal ass judge will back this shit up.

    Really, lets just get rid of the freaking blood sucking lawyers already...

    1. Re:Someone PLEASE kill all the lawyers! by bots · · Score: 1

      It is the way the law is set up. If they dont challenge every seeming infringment and they try to sue someone who really did infringe later they can have the case throw out citing the previous uncontested infringment. laws

    2. Re:Someone PLEASE kill all the lawyers! by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      I see that there are companies that are getting patents on DNA sequences. Next they will try to collect royalties from blue eyed people and suing those that won't pay.
      This isn't a patant fight, but a trademark fight. They are claiming trademark violations.

      I never knew so many /. posters were so ignorant of trademark, service marks, patants, and copyright distinctions. OCLC's law suit is the right action for them to take, if you understand the way the laws work.

      • Trademark & service marks = ownership of a particular mark for a particular usage in a particular domain which can be renewed as long as the mark is in use, to prevent a group's name from being tarnished by shoddy companies.
      • Patants = limited monopolies on the use of a method, to ensure that inventors have time to transform ideas into marketable (and profitable) products.
      • Copyrights = (supposedly) limited term restrictions on reproduction of any recorded information, to allow authors and artists to collect royalties.

      They can claim trademark violations because the hotel is using the marks owned by OCLC without permission. It would be like some no-name snack company naming their products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs". Now I'm off to paste this to all the others who don't bother to understand the law before spouting off about how bad it is.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  99. What kind of bullshit is that? by zachjb · · Score: 1

    It's funny that so many things that you think should be public domain or should be at least not-for-profit, are?

    I never would have imagined the Dewey Decimal System was patented and that libraries have pay money, each year, to use it in their library.

    --

    --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
  100. Heh.... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

    Nothing a high-powered rifle bullet can't fix.

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
  101. A little more info... by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

    Here's what I was able to find on their web site...

    - The Dewey system is constantly evolving. This is not like a copyright on an old text, this is more lika the copyright on a piece of software.

    - I was unable to find any licensing policies, but was able to see that a yearly subscription to the web version of their system(as opposed to buying a $475 book that they update every 7 years) was around $500.

    - They have some interesting OAI hooks into the dewey system for your perusal (OAI servers, etc). It's all Open, by the way.

    - I have an email in to DeweyLicensing@oclc.org asking them about this... I'll post a followup if I hear back.

    --
    Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    1. Re:A little more info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is not like a copyright on an old text, this is more lika the copyright on a piece of software.

      Actually, this is not like copyright at all. It is like . . . excuse me, it IS trademark, something completely different.

    2. Re:A little more info... by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Ok, here's the body of the email I rec'd in reply. A few days too late for anyone to see.

      I suspect recent events have confused a lot of librarians. We currently retail two systems to libraries: an online system that includes more specific pricing (ranging from $65 per year to $900 per year depending on whether one subscribes to the full or abridged edition and depending on the number of users accessing the system) and a four-volume print edition. The DDC 22 is priced at $375 and of course is a one-time fee. Libraries are absolutely able to class their materials via Dewey by whichever tools they have access to. If that means they use another library's print DDC, so be it. Hope this answers your question.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  102. That's not an LOC issue. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    That's not an LOC issue; it's a "MY BOOKS, MINE! MINE!!" issue among university departments. [g] Seriously, what they should have done was what my university did: some books in a particular LOC range were in separate reference libraries, so there was a sign (chart and map) over the LOC paper catalog that told you which catalog ranges were in what building, or even in which section of the main library. That made it very easy to tell where to go after you'd looked up the desired books, rather than learning you were in the wrong building only after you got there.

    Conversely, there's no reason that a DDC library can't be in multiple buildings, where you only learn that the 62* and 59* categories are in the Biology building AFTER you trot all over the main library looking for 'em.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  103. PORN! by Malfourmed · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's the Dewey number for porn?

    Whoops - they actually tell you: 800.001.

    That's gotta be a great come on line for those sexy-looking librarians: "Hey babe, interested in some 800.001?"

    Except that she'll probably come back with "Only in your 800.005."

  104. Do He? by jefu · · Score: 1

    Since the created of DDC1 was an advocate of spelling reform, they should properly honor his notions and use the name as he spelled it : Melvil Dui

  105. We're g33k. Why resort to paper signage? by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1
    Or even a field on the book record saying, "This book is located in N building".

    If the catalog was smart enough, it could know what building you were searching from, and flag those records in your building and another building differently.

  106. I've stayed there -- its a nice place by leko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its a cute hotel. My room was full of cool technology related books.

    There appeared to be somesort of network connectivity in the rooms, but of course I forgot my laptop...

  107. They don't even USE the exact Dewey Decimal System by einTier · · Score: 1

    Seriously. My wife is a librarian, and was quite enthralled with the hotel -- until she actually looked at the list of rooms. The DDC numbers are not correct. For example:

    General Knowledge is 000, not 1000.
    Philosophy is 100, not 1100.
    Religion is 200, not 1200.
    Biography is not 900.006, it's 920.
    Computers are 004, not 600.005.
    If
    pornography has a classification, it is definately not 800.001.

    The major classifications are close, but all the subclassifications are completely incorrect. I know this sounds like nitpicking crap, but librarians are more anal about their classification systems than geeks are about Linux kernals.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  108. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by wfberg · · Score: 1

    It's trademarked, and there is a problem because they are using the Dewey Decimal System name in their advertising [citysearch.com] without permission.

    Problem is, the trademark is for "IC 016. US 038. G & S: Periodical Publication-Namely, an Index Relating to a System of Classifying the Field of Human Knowledge. FIRST"..

    A hotel is not a publication. Unless I'm mistaken. In which case you sir, are a bookworm.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  109. MOD PARENT OFFTOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Melvyl Dewey, feeb.

  110. Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why hasn't all the Library get together and create their own system? They all save $500/year if they use a different system. That's more money for books each year.

  111. Testing the waters. by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1

    Hotels in protest of losing the patent infringment
    with their numbering system, choose to open law
    suits against aparment, condominium and town
    house complexes. They might have a problem with
    the town houses, but there is money to be made
    with abusing the legal system.

    The ability to sue anyone is legalized extortion.

  112. Re:whichever it is, it should have expired by Piquan · · Score: 1

    Erm... That link is to CitySearch's editorial review. I don't see any reason to believe it was written by the hotel itself.

  113. Browsing by Dissonant · · Score: 1

    Searching is not the only application to consider here. By organizing the books hierarchically, you allow a user who is looking for a certain piece of information (rather than a certain book) to browse all books on the subjectwithout having to wander all over the place. Even if books on the subject are split into two or three areas (as in your example), it is vastly more convenient than hunting down every single book by author.

  114. So they think they're smart? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    So they patented those numbers, huh?

    Unfortunately for them, MicroSoft has patented ones and zeroes.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:So they think they're smart? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      So they patented those numbers, huh?
      I know you are trying to be funny, but you are very much wrong. They are claiming trademark violations.

      I never knew so many /. posters were so ignorant of trademark, service marks, patants, and copyright distinctions. OCLC's law suit is the right action for them to take, if you understand the way the laws work.

      • Trademark & service marks = ownership of a particular mark for a particular usage in a particular domain which can be renewed as long as the mark is in use, to prevent a group's name from being tarnished by shoddy companies.
      • Patants = limited monopolies on the use of a method, to ensure that inventors have time to transform ideas into marketable (and profitable) products.
      • Copyrights = (supposedly) limited term restrictions on reproduction of any recorded information, to allow authors and artists to collect royalties.

      They can claim trademark violations because the hotel is using the marks owned by OCLC without permission. It would be like some no-name snack company naming their products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs". Now I'm off to paste this to all the others who don't bother to understand the law before spouting off about how bad it is.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  115. Driving Under Influence? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    "Dui" has too much of a connection with drunkenness.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  116. oh thank heaven by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    ...it's horrible anyways. lets just add more decimal digits for any possible expansion we need!

  117. Economy is in the tank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The economy is in the tank and the tank is being fired on somewhere in Baghdad [blogspot.com] "

    The left-wingers, are of course to blame. The recession started during the Clinton administration, and left-wingers like Tom Daschle in Congress have successfully reduced Bush's fair across-the-board tax cuts so they have little impact (Daschle figures that a terrible economy will help Democrats at the polls: never mind how many people suffer for it).

    Economic recovery would be very bad news for the Democrat Party.

    1. Re:Economy is in the tank. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      The left-wingers, are of course to blame. The recession started during the Clinton administration, and left-wingers like Tom Daschle in Congress have successfully reduced Bush's fair across-the-board tax cuts so they have little impact

      Hey bud, what happened to your 'responsibility' campaign pledge? I have yet to see one thing that has gone wrong that you Fox news clones have not blamed Clinton for. If Clinton is to blame for todays ecconomy then how come he gets absolutely no credit for 1992-2000? Yeah and Bush's tax cuts for the richest of the rich are fair and across the board the way that Fox news is Fair and Balanced.

      When a war starts taxes go up sooner or later. That is why starting wars is a really bad move if you want to keep taxes low. As Sun Tzu said feeding an army of a hundred thousand men will cost a thousand gold pieces every day.

      Tax cuts that are aimed primarily at the richest of the rich do not have a stimulative effect on the economy. The bulk of the tax package that Bush asked for and got kicks in in future years. Yep, the deficit is half a trillion and set to grow.

      Only the deficit ain't going to grow because the failure in the Whitehouse has screwed up both the war and the economy and will shortly be sent back to Texas with his 'hooked on phonics' package. Taxes will then rise back to what they were before, plus some extra to make up for the trillion dollars of waste created by Bush.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:Economy is in the tank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey bud, what happened to your 'responsibility' campaign pledge? I have yet to see one thing that has gone wrong that you Fox news clones have not blamed Clinton for"

      The fact you are forgetting is that we only blame Clinton for things he actually did.

      "If Clinton is to blame for todays ecconomy then..."

      No, he is to blame for starting the recession. Tom Daschle is to blame for keeping it going. Tom has his own reasons. He is a Democrat, but he is not a Clintonazi.

      "how come he gets absolutely no credit for 1992-2000?"

      He deserves a little credit. In 1992, he proposed outrageous wasteful budgets. Even the Democrats in Congress balked. However, in 1994, it was "The Year of the Informed Voter". From then on the GOP gridlocked the Clinton economic plan. After a while, Clinton was smart enough to see that gridlock worked, so he did not fight so hard to overcome it.

      "Yeah and Bush's tax cuts for the richest of the rich"

      Most of those who get the cuts are non-rich. In fact, more gays and lesbians get tax relief than rich people. It is slightly more accurate to call it a "Tax cut for Gays".

      "Tax cuts that are aimed primarily at the richest of the rich "

      I agree. That is why no-one has proposed or passed tax cuts aimed primarily at the rich for a long long time.

      "Taxes will then rise back to what they were before"

      Thankfully, most of the serious Democrats disagree with your prediction of such fiscal responsibility. Such greed would sink their campaigns.

      "plus some extra to make up for the trillion dollars of waste created by Bush."

      No, we need even more tax cuts to get the government off the backs of the productive. The solution is not more government greed. We need a line-item veto and a balanced budget amendment.

      "...the way that Fox news is Fair and Balanced"

      Yes it is. It presents both sides, and is centrist. Those who believe that the news should be left-wing only are rather outraged, and clammor for the censorship of it.

    3. Re:Economy is in the tank. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      "...the way that Fox news is Fair and Balanced"
      Yes it is. It presents both sides, and is centrist. Those who believe that the news should be left-wing only are rather outraged, and clammor for the censorship of it.

      People will think that I am paying you to make these softballs.

      The only censorship that has been going on is Bill O'Reilly going to court to supress Al Franken's book about him, appropriately titles Lies and the Lying Liars who tell them. Bill O'Reilly really does not want people to know that he lied about having a Peabody award and then lied about having lied.

      But then again if you work for Fox news you must get so used to telling lies that telling the truth would become difficult.

      Oh look, Al Franken still outselling O'Reilly on Amazon despite all those books he must have sold already having been number one for so many weeks. Looks like Murdoch hasn't being placing enough bulk orders.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    4. Re:Economy is in the tank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only censorship that has been going on is Bill O'Reilly..."

      No. You are forgetting that a big part of the recent protest of the FCC decision was a desire to censor/silence/muzzle Rupert Murdoch. They even used him explicitly in their ads.

      As for the Franken book situation, what do you expect when Franken decides to cash in on someone else's trademark without permission.

      "But then again if you work for Fox news you must get so used to telling lies"

      No, Fox tends to be more truthful. However, since it tend to be centrist, those who prefer their media to be only left-wing (or right-wing) sure don't like it.

      "Oh look, Al Franken still outselling O'Reilly on Amazon despite all those books "

      The book sales war thing is pretty lame of O'Reilly, true.

  118. Wrong. Read the law. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    The original 1870 work, minus title, is wholly and unambiguously in the public domain. That much is certain.

    http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ22.html#public


    Trademark is admittedly a different story. Had they called it the "Dewey Decimal Hotel, LLP" or actually sold copies for an index of their own under that name, I'd be swayed to the "open and shut case" they're harping about. Merely mentioning the name and ostensibly using a public domain version doesn't seem so "open and shut" else Ford would be slammed by Daimler-Chrysler for for repeatedly mentioning the Mercedes mark in their annual reports.

    There's an interesting article about the vagueries of establishing trademark infringement damages here:

    http://techlawadvisor.com/wires/ip.html/a.

  119. Why it's not free by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I think all the "jeez, they're try to license X next" posts kind of miss the point. The people who own Dewey aren't just selling a taxonomy. They're selling a process for mapping the subject matter of a book onto that taxonomy. Which they can't do if they let the taxonomy enter the public domain. So as silly as sounds, they have no choice but to sue anybody who uses the system without paying for it. Even if it's a hotel just trying to be clever.

  120. This is exactly what the law is for. by Frobnicator · · Score: 2, Informative
    I never would have imagined the Dewey Decimal System was patented and that libraries have pay money, each year, to use it in their library.
    First, there is a big difference between patents and trademarks. They are (CORRECTLY) claiming trademark violation.

    They own the trademark on Dewey Decimal System and other words. They manage the numbering system. The actual numbering system can be used by anybody, although businesses (not public libraries) may need to pay roalties based on their uses of the system.

    I never knew so many /. posters were so ignorant of trademark, service marks, patants, and copyright distinctions.

    • Trademark & service marks = ownership of a particular mark for a particular usage in a particular domain which can be renewed as long as the mark is in use, to prevent a group's name from being tarnished by shoddy companies.
    • Patants = limited monopolies on the use of a method, to ensure that inventors have time to transform ideas into marketable (and profitable) products.
    • Copyrights = (supposedly) limited term restrictions on reproduction of any recorded information, to allow authors and artists to collect royalties.

    They can claim trademark violations because they are using the marks owned by OCLC without permission. It would be like some no-name snack company naming their products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs". Now I'm off to paste this to all the others who don't bother to understand the law before spouting off about how bad it is.

    frob

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:This is exactly what the law is for. by What+is+a+number · · Score: 1


      No, it would not be like 'some no-name snack company naming their products "Twinkies" and "Ding-Dongs".' The service being sold is a hotel, not a sorting system.

      It would be like me writing some software for Windows and selling it as "Foobar for Windows". I CAN do that and I do NOT have to pay MS to use the word "Windows" or even "Microsoft Windows". But I do have to say somewhere "Microsoft Windows is a trademark of MS blah blah blah..." But I cannot write an OS and call it Windows (or at least not Microsoft Windows.) See the difference?

      Noting who owns the trademark should be all this hotel needs to do.

      I think the OCLC could/should be able to sue for _something_ if the hotel used recent Dewey categories, but they don't.


      ----
      I type this every time.

  121. Bullshit (was Wrong. Read the law.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trademark certainly is a different from copyright, so it's a good thing that the lawsuit has nothing at all to do with copyright. That makes the link to a Copyright Office circular (which, incidentally, is not the law but a summary for the general public -- for the actual law you would need to read Title 17 and all the related case history) entirely irrelevant. The hotel isn't merely mentioning the name, it goes into precise detail that it is offering a library -- not only strangely named rooms -- based on the system. It is amusing that one would believe an 1876 publication would contain classifications for computers and new media, as the hotel advertises. The fact that OCLC sent no fewer than three (3) notifications to the hotel chain since the establishment opened, and that there was no response whatsoever, strongly suggests that the hotel knows it is in the wrong. THis is especially remarkable given that OCLC don't' actually want triple profits, just a simple acklnowledgement. (The big numbers in these lawsuits seem to shock people, but in general these are not meant to have anytyhing to do with expected damages. It's all about making sure the other party doesn't try to ignore the matter, as a default judgement would be really, really expensive.)

  122. Great Example of Lawyer Gibberish by serutan · · Score: 1

    Their attorney says, "A person who came to their Web site and looked at the way (the hotel) is promoted and marketed would think they were passing themselves off as connected with the owner of the Dewey Decimal Classification system."

    Actually, no normal person would assume that ANYTHING that has been in use for more than 125 years would still be proprietary. To regard such bizarre thinking as normal, and to be able to say something like that with a straight face, you have to go to law school.

  123. Dewey Decimal Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dewey decimal system blows anyways. There are a lot better ways to keep track of archives. I saw someone make up one for the public domain and all libraries will switch over and the bastards who hold the copyright will basically lose out. Sucks to be them!

  124. Trademark, not copyright by stilleon · · Score: 1

    Looks like the "dewey decimal system" is a trademark, but isn't the system itself public domain. It was invented in 1876. Evreything before the mid-20s is in the piblic domain.

  125. Yeah... /. people are so stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I never knew so many /. posters were so ignorant of trademark, service marks, patants, and copyright distinctions."

    A lot of the idiots around here think you can patent "one click purchase" on a web page.

    How idiotic would you have to be to think that could be patented?

  126. Try ANU by tqft · · Score: 1

    was a bit of a shock to me when I got to ANU and found I had to learn a whole ne classification system as I knew my Dewey well.

    Ah well - QA was most of what I needed.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:Try ANU by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      Ahh, thanks for the tip, in a few months I will be travelling to Canberra and spending most of a week or so sitting in the ANY library! So I will be prepared ...

      Trust ANU to be different. Elitist snobs! :)

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    2. Re:Try ANU by tqft · · Score: 1

      I was never elitist any cold beer or living woman (preferably both at the same time) was fine.

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
  127. OS Hex Filing System by chiasmus1 · · Score: 1
    Now all we need is an Open Source Hex Filing System that can be used by anyone. Just split it into 16 categories with lots of sub-categories. All libraries could use this system without any problems. You could have two parts to the number, the category and the specific publication. You could even incorporate the ISBN number as part of the larger number, but the people searching through the library would only need to see the category part. If you had enough bits you could record everything everyone ever wrote.

    The biggest problems would be building the initial list, and picking the person to maintain the list. It would be a problem if someone decided to fork the project though.

  128. trademark is a Strange Creature(tm) by akahige · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unlike patents, there is NO equivalent to prior art when it comes to trademark. Anyone can, at anytime, register a trademark on the most mundane thing or obvious thing. Trademarks -- unlike copyright and patents -- do not expire. It's the one thing that "creators" can be said to continuously own. An interesting application of this concept is the case of Tarzan. Created by Edgar Rice Burroughs in 1912, the work itself is now in the public domain. HOWEVER, Burroughs also had the forethought to register Tarzan as a trademark. That means a couple of things: 1) anyone can make a film adaptation of Tarzan of the Apes without having to pay money to the Burroughs estate; 2) no one can create *new* stories featuring the trademark protected character of Tarzan without they are licensed by same said Burroughs estate. The heirs of Conan Doyle were exceptionally displeased with things like Without a Clue and the Sherlock Holmes related stories on Star Trek: TNG, but since they had no legal protection, there wasn't a whole lot they could do about it. Now, this begs an interesting question -- how is it, exactly, that the Doyle estate (or anyone else) could not (or cannot) register Holmes and Watson as a trademark, but Forest Press could register "Dewey Decimal Classification" some 31 years after the death of Melvil Dewey, and almost 100 years after its creation? I haven't a clue...

    check out the DDCS trademark filing.

  129. money grabbing whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    filthy disgusting action!

    if they are 'non profit' then why seeking so much?

    triple the hotels profit since opening?? when all they charge for normal usage is $500 per year?

    they should just be asking for $500*x , where x is number of years hotel has been using the system.

    thats fair and correct.

    damn lawyers and money grabbing whores!

  130. More than one way to skin a cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why insist on the Dewey system? There's also the Universal Decimal Classification, which is sufficienly close to the DDC for the purposes of this hotel.

  131. Thanks by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the enlightenment. I was aware that this was a trademark issue, though. I only used `patented' because that's what the The Onion article uses. I thought the ability to have any rights to (IMO) very common _words_ is so ridiculous that I didn't even bother to make a serious post.

    Cheers!

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  132. As I was Googling for a tree... by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    I went Googling for the Dewey Decimal System, and since it was being slow, I decided to do some Hoovering because my house was dirty. All the dust it threw up made me sneeze so I reached for a Kleenex. After that I came back to my computer to find I had gotten a bunch more Spam in my email account.

    Now sue me companies, first one gets full publicity on Slashdot!! :)

    The lawyers sueing have obviously come from the 001.9 section of the library.... of the bottom feeding kind!

    It's high time the world rid itself of IP. It's a cancer that threatens to destroy the progression of the arts and sciences forever.

    1. Re:As I was Googling for a tree... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Tell me, did you Xerox any of that Spam?

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  133. Charge for numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That gives a chance that numerals (as in 0123..) to be patented, as well.
    Hmm.., that 's a problem: the people who invented these are the *Arabs* !

  134. mod parent down as flamebait surely! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    The DDC is such a pain in the ass when you're used to LOC....But personally I find the DDC obnoxious"


    This is like saying "The (OS I hate) is a pain in the ass when you're used to (OS I love) .. but personally I find the (OS I hate) obnoxious". Back up with facts. Come on, even the OS-war emails on slashdot at least say "I hate Windows because of disfunction X, Y, Z".


    At least back up your point of view with some facts, tell us about the differences in the schemes, why one is more preferable to the other.

  135. 1337 by ma++i+ude · · Score: 1

    Damn, Mr Dewey was definitely on to something. Who would've thought the categody 133.7 is fraud"?

    --
    You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
  136. sheesh... by Fry-kun · · Score: 1

    ...just use the Fry-kun's hexadecimal filing system... :P

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?