Slashdot Mirror


Torvalds the "5th Most-Powerful Man in Tech"

An anonymous reader writes "According to silicon.com, Linus Torvalds is the fifth most influential man in technology. The bio they have written for him isn't the most flattering to the open source community though. I quote: "If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls." It goes on to say: "In truth Torvalds best work is in the past"... which seems to negate their own argument for having him in there. Also in the Top 5 is Steve Jobs (1) who comes out on top of Bill Gates (2). As an interesting aside, the writer of the Sobig virus even makes it in at Number 42..."

594 comments

  1. 5th most powerful? by jargoone · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's it? Should be #2. Linux is the second best OS in the land!

    1. Re:5th most powerful? by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bahaha! That was really quite funny. Too bad the "m0d d00dz" can't take a joke.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:5th most powerful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is the second best OS in the land!

      That will change soon - don't you know that BSD is dying!

    3. Re:5th most powerful? by jo42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Butt plugs all around!

    4. Re:5th most powerful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's pretty decent, as far as gay porn is concerned. Not at all hairy actually. Not sure about the pex though.

  2. Does this mean by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean he now has a chance of obliterating Gates in "Celebrity Deathmatch" ?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Does this mean by Trigun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Number of results on Google for the keywords Linus Torvalds and Bill Gates:

      Linus Torvalds
      ( 814 000 results)
      versus
      Bill Gates
      (2 720 000 results)

      The winner is: Bill Gates


      He still has a ways to go to win a googlefight.
    2. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means Linus has even a harder times scoring then Gates does.

    3. Re:Does this mean by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

      If you count progeny, it would appear Linus is ahead. :)

    4. Re:Does this mean by mahdi13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Caution, Google results may vary...

      "Linus Torvalds"
      2,260,000

      "Bill Gates"
      2,460,000


      Clearly it is a very close fight!

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    5. Re:Does this mean by salimma · · Score: 1
      Right, can't help myself :)
      • Linus Torvalds - 1,710,000 results
      • "Linus Torvalds" - 1,870,000 results
      • Bill Gates - 2,890,000 results
      • "Bill Gates" - 1,910,000 results
      • "William H. Gates III" - 5,650 results

      Has anyone else noticed that while searching for bill+gates predictably returns more results than searching for "bill gates" (since bill and gates do not have to be adjacent), in Linus' case the opposite happens?

      And that if we search by formal names, Linus wins hands-down :). I say, we should search by the name that appears on their passports.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    6. Re:Does this mean by BhAaD · · Score: 1

      The names included in quotes gives the results for the *actual* Bill Gates and not just another Bill Blojo or Bob Gates. "Linus Torvalds" 1,320,000 "Bill Gates" 1,610,000 Wins but not by much :)

    7. Re:Does this mean by websaber · · Score: 1
      windows - 197,000,000

      Linux - 115,000,000

      but that includes all of kinds of windows

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    8. Re:Does this mean by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know, but I try not to pick my mentors or stocks by what Googlefight thinks :)

  3. A comment: by Kedisar · · Score: 0, Funny

    Linus Torvolds on the 4 tech gods who beat him out:

    "They are smoking crack..."

  4. Who is Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And how do I get back to aol.com from this site? I just installed this Internet. HELP!!!

    1. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Kedisar · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's easy. All you have to do is assemble all your software in neat little piles. Then, stand on your chair, high above your cubicle wall, and scream "DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW TO READ A MANUAL!?"

    2. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, you blew it. A true AOL'r wouldn't know that AOL has a aol.com site, or that you can get to it from AOL, much less why you would want to...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:Who is Torvalds? by coolmacdude · · Score: 4, Funny

      Newcomer huh. Trust me its not worth it. (I just finished the internet.)

      --

      -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
    4. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Newcomer huh. Trust me its not worth it. (I just finished the internet.)

      Yeah, the end guy was hard, wasn't he? :)
    5. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, I'm not sure I like where this conversation is going!

    6. Re:Who is Torvalds? by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1

      And of course they are bound to make a sequel...

    7. Re:Who is Torvalds? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      bah - I'll just wait for the book to come out...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    8. Re:Who is Torvalds? by lovswr · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only person who saw the version of the "Two Towers"..I actually went to school the next day singing that song....Where's there's a whip...LOL

    9. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yay. Someone that thinks posting bash.org quote concepts here is a good thing. Sorry, no. LOOSER! YOU FUCKING LOSER! YOU LOSE!

    10. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yay. Someone that thinks posting bash.org quote concepts here is a good thing. Sorry, no. LOOSER! YOU FUCKING LOSER! YOU LOSE!

      So, exactly how long HAS it been since you had a blowjob? Two years? Three?

    11. Re:Who is Torvalds? by CCIEwannabe · · Score: 1

      I just finished the internet

      Was the end guy hard?

    12. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Angram · · Score: 1

      Feh - there'll be a movie soon enough.

      --

      GL
    13. Re:Who is Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      five :(

  5. Mmmmm by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    The bio they have written for him isn't the most flattering to the open source community though.

    Whatya mean? the last line says "Rumour has it he's a Guinness man as well." Mmmmmmm...Guinness...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  6. Hmmmm so that means.... by arcite · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If Linus had gigantic breasts and long flowing hair.....oh wait MB not.

  7. Wah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You don't have a poster of Linus on your wall?

    1. Re:Wah? by LittleGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't have a poster of Linus on your wall?

      I have one of Lucy instead, you insensitive blockhead!

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    2. Re:Wah? by Savatte · · Score: 4, Funny

      of course not! It's on the ceiling above my bed.

    3. Re:Wah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a live-size rubber doll of Torvalds. Every night I do imaginative pair-programming with him. I did some really perverted low latency stuff last night, and I hope they merge it in 2.6. But now back to work, honey...

  8. Agenda setting by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ranking is the top Agenda setters, not the most powerful folks in tech as the poster states. For this reason I can easily see S. Jobs and Gates towards the top. This is slightly different than influence and worlds different that "Most Powerful".

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Agenda setting by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Funny

      ah, okay, that makes much more sense.

      geez, do the editors even read the articles anymore?

    2. Re:Agenda setting by mhesseltine · · Score: 5, Funny
      geez, do the editors even read the articles anymore?

      I'm sorry. Did you just imply that the editors ever read the articles? That must have been before I started reading this site.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    3. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      geez, do the editors even read the articles anymore?

      You mean they did before?

    4. Re:Agenda setting by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd be interested to see a 'most hated people' in the computing industry list.

      I expect Gates, McBride and Bernard Shifman would all place near the top.

    5. Re:Agenda setting by intermodal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      you forgot the "dude, you're gettin' a Dell" guy. but he's in prison...I don't think he counts anymore.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    6. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Larry Ellison. You can disagree with his business practices, etc. but Gates at least is somewhat pleasant personally. Ellison is just a prick AND his company is evil.

    8. Re:Agenda setting by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you just imply that the editors ever read the articles?

      I'm sure they do, from time to time. But what you should be asking is if they *comprehend* the articles...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    9. Re:Agenda setting by c1ay · · Score: 1

      This list is the top 50, not the bottom 50...

      --

    10. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find any sign that Benjamin Curtis is in prison. He spend a few hours in jail after he was arrested, but the news never seemed to pick up the results of his trial (or more likely plea). They don't waste jail space on small time drug users. We couldn't afford to keep that many people locked up.

    11. Re:Agenda setting by rbullo · · Score: 2, Funny

      In prison?

      Excuse my ignorance, but could you fill me in on his crime(s)?

      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    12. Re:Agenda setting by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Apparently, he was caught smoking ganja.

    13. Re:Agenda setting by intermodal · · Score: 1

      nah, he was just in jail for a bit for drugs.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    14. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially in NYC. With the downward economy and reduced police force, the crackheads are back on the streets...

    15. Re:Agenda setting by Mike+McCune · · Score: 3, Informative
      He got busted buying weed. Is it such a surprise that the "Dell Dude" is a pot head?

      Dude, You're Getting a Cell

      He is not in jail, though. His case was dismissed as long as he stays out of trouble.

      'Dell Dude' released after marijuana arrest

      --

      In a world that is Free and Open, who needs Windows and Gates?

    16. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morons. The parent poster was being sarcastic because he never went to prison. You don't get sent to prison for smoking dope, AFAIK, unless you have enough to be considered a dealer.

    17. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. he appears to have chosen the phrasing for fuller effect, not for accuracy.

    18. Re:Agenda setting by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      second search item on google search for Benjamin Curtis: 'Dell Dude' released after marijuana arrest

    19. Re:Agenda setting by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. Did you just imply that the editors ever read the articles? That must have been before I started reading this site.

      It certainly seemed like they did at one point. If your user number is any indication of when you started reading this site then yes, it was before that.

      Hell, they HAD to at some point, it's not like /. sprung forth fully formed like Athena from the head of Zeus.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    20. Re:Agenda setting by IAR80 · · Score: 1

      Then Dell is not such a bad place after all!

      --
      http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    21. Re:Agenda setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More information on the dell dude criminal activities here.

    22. Re:Agenda setting by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they do, from time to time. But what you should be asking is if they *comprehend* the articles...

      Would you mind clarifying that, please?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    23. Re:Agenda setting by styrotech · · Score: 1

      The ranking is the top Agenda setters, not the most powerful folks in tech as the poster states.

      I reckon the top 50 setters of UK Tech Agendas might be more accurate.

      I mean, there are BT and NHS lackeys in there that will never have much if any influence outside the UK.

    24. Re:Agenda setting by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Shiffman? You have to be kidding.

      Perhaps Stratton Sclavos, although he'll be quickly forgotten now that Sitesquatter is gone.

      Bill Gates and Darl McBride, certainly. And any of the ROKSO spammers (which quite likely includes whoever's behind SoBig)

      Personally my top five most hated would list Darl McBride first, second and fifth, with Bill Gates filling the remaining two places.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    25. Re:Agenda setting by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Well, I remember a time when nobody complained about editors not reading the articles, is that good enough?

      I also remember when CowboyNeal had never been the default poll option, First Post started at comment ID#1, and yes, I even remember when www.slashdot.org didn't resolve. My how times have changed.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    26. Re:Agenda setting by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they do, from time to time. But what you should be asking is if they *comprehend* the articles...

      > Would you mind clarifying that, please?


      Damn you! You made me lose a bit of beer laughing at that comment!

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    27. Re:Agenda setting by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      Well, congrats. You are probably the oldest (by user ID #) user I've ever had comment on something I said. Tell me more about the good old days.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  9. Pff by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1, Funny

    If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls.
    But I DO have posters of Torvlads on my walls :(

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    1. Re:Pff by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      But I DO have posters of Torvlads on my walls :(
      Before anyone says anything...
      *Torvalds

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    2. Re:Pff by rifter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls."

      But I DO have posters of Torvlads on my walls :(

      Besides, they clearly displayed their cluelessness by not listing Carrie Ann Moss and Natalie Portman, who enjoy an almost exclusively geek following and great popularity therein....

    3. Re:Pff by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      But I DO have posters of Torvlads on my walls :(

      You have a poster of the guy on you wall but you can't spell his name? :)

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    4. Re:Pff by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 1

      You have a poster of the guy on you wall but you can't spell his name? :)
      Before anyone says anything...
      *Torvalds

      Cuh

      --
      I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    5. Re:Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed fully. LC and XWP are a lot more mainstream. I think the other two are closer to the geek culture. And Sandra Bullock - but maybe that's just me! Anon so as not to lose my mod points here...

    6. Re:Pff by jonfelder · · Score: 2, Funny
      Troll=1, Redundant=2, Funny=6, Overrated=3, Total=12: So was it funny or not?


      If you have to ask, it wasn't.

    7. Re:Pff by zmooc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone mod this guy up just to annoy him, please.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    8. Re:Pff by devphaeton · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't have a poster of Torvalds, nor RMS, or ESR. hell, i don't have posters of Lara Croft nor Natalie Pr0tman.

      I do however have a full-sized billboard advertisement for a national brand of Instant Grits.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    9. Re:Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torvlads
      aka the open source impaler.

    10. Re:Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a poster of the guy on you wall but you can't spell his name? :)

      Perhaps it's the right name but just the wrong guy ?

    11. Re:Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Gillian Anderson or Julia Sawalha either! Least! Insightful! Article! Ever! I don't think I know a single geek with posters of either of their two suggestions pinned up.

    12. Re:Pff by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Alyson Hannigan?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    13. Re:Pff by murr · · Score: 1

      Would that be Torvlad the Implementer?

  10. Darl? by Ikeya · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where's Darl McBride on the top 50? I'd say he's pretty influential right now. Look at him, he has the UNIX world groveling before him!

    --
    ---- Move SIG...For great justice!
    1. Re:Darl? by Dysso · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's spelled "growling"...

    2. Re:Darl? by rifter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where's Darl McBride on the top 50? I'd say he's pretty influential right now. Look at him, he has the UNIX world groveling before him!

      According to legend, when Apple became a corporation and therefore employees had to be numbered, there wasa disagreement between Wozniak and Jobs over who to be number 1 which was settled by making Woz number 1 and Jobs number 0. Now it is Darl's turn to be 0. :) Fitting isn't it?

    3. Re:Darl? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      We aren't groveling to Darl! We are standing up to his bullsh*t!

    4. Re:Darl? by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      Darl isn't on the list because he's scheduled to be taken down in the next Bond movie...The McBride Who Loved Me. In it, Bond is forced to take on McBride in a fight to the finish, and once he's done, he gets a reward ceremony presented by the Queen and Bill Gates.

    5. Re:Darl? by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      How about Darl is number one on the list of most laughed at people in the computer world with Laura DiDio taking number two and the rest of the SCO upper management taking the remainder of the top spots.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    6. Re:Darl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know #1 == pee pee
      and #2 == doo doo
      but what's #0?

      oh.

    7. Re:Darl? by fuqqer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Putting Darl McTurd on that list is equivalent to putting the Iraqi Information Minister on a list of the most influential politicians in the Middle East. e.g. stupid.

      I'm surprised at Number 3...I've never heard of him. Come on, Sklyarov above Ellison? Why weren't any networking or ISP execs mentioned in the top 5. It's obvious that networking and services are the biggest growth technologies. The guys who wrote this are stuck in the past with software developers. I'm not a good programmer, but I think I can safely say that there have been no major advances or paradigm shifts in software recently.

      I believe hardware and networking guys should be making the top 5 or ten people in that list. Paradigm shifts in hardware are being seen all the time. Shifts to broadband, wi-fi, miniaturization, networking technologies, these are the future.

      - Not writing a sig bows to your overlords on incomprehensible slashdot estonia...

    8. Re:Darl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The republican propaganda wing gets the IIM award (Iraqi Information Minister).

      I think Darl thought what he was doing was best for his company, and he underestimated. I also think he had little choice the undertaking.

    9. Re:Darl? by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      How about Darl is number one on the list of most laughed at people in the computer world

      How about making that the most hated man in the world. Saddam or Osama bin Laden might be number two, but not for long before they are forgotten, and some other guy from crack SCO management team takes their place.

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    10. Re:Darl? by merdark · · Score: 1

      Linux does not constitute the whole Unix world. In fact, didn't RMS or someone claim that GNU/Linux is not unix?

      More like Darl McBride has the whole OSS world groveling before him.

    11. Re:Darl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, whenever I read anything from ol' Darl, all that comes to mind is number two.

    12. Re:Darl? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Where's Darl McBride on the top 50? I'd say he's pretty influential right now. Look at him, he has the UNIX world groveling before him!

      You have to be skeptical of the methodology. This is just a list of the top 50 best known people in tech. It says nothing about influence.

      Take for example the listing of Knuth who has been retired for several years at this point. About twenty of the people on the list are CTOs or CEOs of barely known startus with a 95% probability of disappearing without a trace.

      They got a small number of positions right. Linus, Gates are near the top. But why are Balmer and Tim Berners-Lee right at the bottom?

      Nobody active in the IETF or OASIS standards processes is mentioned - these are the people who really set trends for the industry.

      The secret of these lists is that the real parameter being measured is number of press mentions in the rag that compiles them which in turn tends to translate into number of advertisements...

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    13. Re:Darl? by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2, Funny

      If he succeeds, you may be right. I just don't think he has a snowball's chance in hell but then the Cubs are in the playoffs so hell may have cooled off a degree or two. My bet is Darl joins the other dispised, corrupt ex-CEOs like Ken Lay (Enron), Bernie Ebbers (MCI), Kozloski (Tyco), etc. who thought they could make a dishonest buck at other people's (including their shareholder's) expense.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    14. Re:Darl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely broadband, wi-fi and other networking are at least as much about software as they are about hardware.

    15. Re:Darl? by krysith · · Score: 1

      From elsewhere on the article webpage (http://specials.silicon.com/as2003/analysis2.html )

      "Someone who could well have fallen into this category this year but didn't make the list at all is SCO CEO Darl McBride. He has led his company's charge to get credit for what it claims is some of its code turning up in Linux. So far the row has taken the form of a lawsuit brought against IBM, headlines in the media and SCO invoicing some users for Linux roll outs.

      However, when asked what happened when his company was served with a request to pay a SCO licence for Linux, panellist Ric Francis, Safeway's CIO, said: "I told them to stick it. At the end of the day it is never going to fly. It's the last dying breath of a company that is never going to make money."

      McBride - in the headlines yes, agenda setting no. There is a difference. "

    16. Re:Darl? by Saithier · · Score: 1

      Actually, that turns out not to be the case. Steve Jobs is employee #2.

    17. Re:Darl? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking Darl needs to be on the list. Sorta like Hitler belongs on the list of those who influenced the 20th century. Granted, Darl isn't as powerful and evil a despot as Hitler was, but he seems to be trying.

    18. Re:Darl? by td · · Score: 1

      Knuth retired from his position at Stanford as part of a program of eliminating all commitments that might keep him from working on the remaining volumes of The Art of Computer Programming. He certainly hasn't stopped work. In fact, he's already circulating drafts of several sections of Volume 4, his first new work (other than revision of volumes 1-3) on TAOCP in many years. Progress report here.

      --
      -Tom Duff
    19. Re:Darl? by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
      S: "I'm going to be the President."

      W: "You can't be President, I'm President."

      S: "Fine, then I'm King and Tyrant."

    20. Re:Darl? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Corporations don't require employees to be numbered. Must be a urban legend.

    21. Re:Darl? by rifter · · Score: 1

      Corporations don't require employees to be numbered. Must be a urban legend.

      To be fair, I got it from the movie "The Pirates of Silicon Valley." BUt I did think it was a funny story, and making Darl #0 does have so many apt connotations....

  11. Power or Influence by pork_spies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are not the same! Influential people can be those who influence those with power but may have little or no power themselves. Think of advisors to POTUS.

    1. Re:Power or Influence by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      This list doesn't seem to be about either. As far as I can tell it's based only on notoriety. Honestly, what other reason would there be for putting Skylarov on the list? He has neither influence nor power.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    2. Re:Power or Influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powerful yes, but who pulls the most chicks?

  12. Ahem! by Decaffeinated+Jedi · · Score: 1
    "If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls." It goes on to say: "In truth Torvalds best work is in the past"...
    That's a poster of T'Pol, thank you very much. ;)
    --
    DecafJedi
    my weblog: apropos of something
  13. Top 5 by jimi1283 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Agenda setters, not most influential people in technology. The title of the article is misleading.

  14. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Bernard Shifman?!?!?!?!!!111

  15. Torvalds might only be fifth... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... but you can reasonably expect to sit down and have a beer with him after work if you're in the right city. Can you say the same about numbers one through four?

    It's nice having people in the upper-levels of Linux kernel development who actually read and post to mailing lists...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's nice having people in the upper-levels of Linux kernel development who actually read and post to mailing lists...

      If Bill G and Steve J actually did any development any more then you could make this a valid comparison.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    2. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft! Yes, you can sit down with Torvalds if you ever visit him, but I got the SoBig virus delivered TO MY HOME and he is number 42! Beat that, you tech heads!

    3. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs was never technical. He was more the "ideas" person on the sales and business side. Woz was the brains behind Apple, Jobs was the hype.

    4. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, yea, and the hype won.

    5. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are 'people programmers' which is an often overlooked or despised skill by engineers, never the less it is a skill.

    6. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by DarkDigger · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine Bill Gates being a people anything.

    7. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "but you can reasonably expect to sit down and have a beer with Bill Gates after work if you're in the right city?"

      Dunno, Microsoft say that they want to be cool now, so you'd kinda expect it of him...

    8. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Woz was the brains behind Apple, Jobs was the hype.

      Logically, then, Woz sucked, and Jobs was the suck.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by mantera · · Score: 1

      I agree with that... i have at times got replies and emails regarding usenet posts i made from open source celebrities and sometimes, remembering a name, i only find out later who ther person is or how important he is when i see him quoted or mentioned in some historical account in some article online. And i think... "whoaaa!!"

    10. Re:Torvalds might only be fifth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago, I asked Bill a canned question once, and received a canned answer. It was all scripted (on my end at least), and definately no beer.

  16. Bullshit by CausticWindow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yet another random ranking that's supposed to make some kind of sense. Anybody that wants to believe that Steve Jobs is more powerful than Bill Gates will probably like it though. And even though Linus Torvalds does a great job with Linux, how do they figure he's powerful? Utter crap.

    Cosmo for geeks?

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Bullshit by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      Yet another random ranking that's supposed to make some kind of sense. Anybody that wants to believe that Steve Jobs is more powerful than Bill Gates will probably like it though. And even though Linus Torvalds does a great job with Linux, how do they figure he's powerful? Utter crap.
      How can you say that? The ranking is based on votes of very respectable people. They even have a lawyer and an MP (that's right, Member of Parliament) among them!
    2. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs has zealots on his side. Anyone with an army of zealots is pretty powerful.

    3. Re:Bullshit by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      probably gates is not viewed as 'influential' because he doesn't make so much trendsetting choices himself(or at least, the voters think so, i don't know shit about their decision process), rather he just does what his told or what everybody else is already doing. he doesn't decide if the next product from ms will be shipped in aluminum boxes or not, he lets other people decide it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Bullshit by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      ahh but it goes further than that, he has NEVER done anything but followed the indusry. Look at DOS (stolen using a divorce settelment that neither party realized what the other was doing and in the end DR DOS ended up in Bills hands, Windows (stolen by backsourcing the code they got from apple when Microsoft was coding the original Appleworks), even .Net (hmm AOL anyone???)

      All of it has been either copying, stealing, or both. Honestly the only person who is worse in this industry is Michael Dell, who emulates everything and then says HE invented it (anyone remeber when durring a press conference HE said he created 802.11b and Dell was the first to put it into it's laptops a YEAR after Apple and Sony did it.)

      but regardless this was based on agenda so its not who's most powerful, and I think maybe Bill should be number one, what with all the press releases saying they are going to fix the swiss cheeese that is XP (yes I know you have to have at least cheese to have holes in it while XP is really more one GIANT hole, but saying air isnt as cool)

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  17. double dipping by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    So how do we know the anonomous writer of the SoBig virus isn't already near the top of the list?

    --

  18. Most powerful tech erection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I don't wanna look at those distended basketballs! NoSilicon.com is a much better choice for your most powerful tech erection!

  19. 42 by fussman · · Score: 0

    SoBig author huh? What does that make VicodinES (the author of the Melissa worm long ago)?

    --
    Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    1. Re:42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vicodin? That's covered by Rush Limbaugh's entry on another top-50 list.

  20. Influential or powerful? by djeaux · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sometimes the two aren't the same, are they?

    Bill Gates is powerful, because he's so insanely wealthy. He then can influence all sorts of people with his power.

    Linus Torvalds may be influential in tech circles, but whether that translates into any normal interpretation of "power" is another question.

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    1. Re:Influential or powerful? by cube+farmer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bill Gates is powerful, because he's so insanely wealthy. He then can influence all sorts of people with his power.

      Yes, yes. But Steve Jobs is the one who's insanely great .

      Marketing slogans aside, it's really good to see a more-or-less mainstream press article rating the influence of a "grassroots" movement so highly in relation to more traditional business.

      --

      MacOS, Windows, BeOS, GNOME, KDE: they're all just Xerox copies

    2. Re:Influential or powerful? by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      How do you think he got so insanely wealthy?

      It wouldn't be by being the head of a software company whose software runs on over 90% of desktop computers would it?

      Gates says jump, and the majority of the closed source software world (and a good bit of the hardware world) says, "How high?" Is this because he's wealthy? No. It's because they know that all Gates has to do is issue an order and cause their product to no longer work with Windows.

      Influence and power are a bit different...influence is being able to get people to do things. Power is being able to -force- people to do things.

    3. Re:Influential or powerful? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, most people think of him as powerful because he's the Microsoft figurehead. Very often, people forget that the actions of a company are not decided by one man alone. It takes people to come up with ideas, people to evaluate them, people to evaluate the evaluations, people to describe the evaluations in a short manner for important figureheads, and people to actually do the ideas. So there is a fundamental attribution error going on, if people see Microsoft's consistant dominance, and think, "Bill Gates did this alone."

      Linus has the distinction of not having any subordinates to summarize and what not. This comes as a consequence of not actually operating a business around his own software. Indeed, one could compare the various distrobutions of Linux, with their own custom source trees, to different people and ideas. But they all originate from his managed source, patched to run the way they like. When he applies a patch, it means nearly every vendor in town will be using it. That is a key difference; his decisions affect the many companies selling and support Linux. Nobody else is in quite the position as he is, especially now that Alan Cox is stepping away for a while.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:Influential or powerful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs?

      He's just this guy, you know?

    5. Re:Influential or powerful? by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

      Linus Torvalds starting smething that has the biggest software manufacture in the world nervous. Some of Microsoft's descisions are made because of Linux. Linux is influencing Microsoft.

      --
      Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
    6. Re:Influential or powerful? by rzbx · · Score: 1

      Influene is power. Some influence with money, some by intellect, some by fame, some by threats, some by status, and maybe a few others. Influence is power and why a lot of readers here don't understand that, I don't know. The only problem is, determining the power the different types of influence have. Also to note, influence is a tool. A wealthy man who knows not how to use his tool wisely, is not as influential as one who does.

      What do you mean by "normal interpretation of "power""? I guess it all comes down to this one question.

      --
      Question everything.
  21. Attitude by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls.

    Yay! Linux manages to take one step forward in the acceptance of it by PHB's and CTO's in large organisations and two steps back by making it sound like it's hacked by a bunch of teenage nerds with no understanding of the "real world" (let alone "real women").

    Image might not be everything - but its a big something.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  22. Good idea by the_consumer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stroking the ego of a virus writer, way to go. I'm sure that'll entice her to stop.

    --
    "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    1. Re:Good idea by beady · · Score: 1

      her you say?
      Do you know something we don't? or is it a case of "statistics be damned"?

    2. Re:Good idea by Martigan80 · · Score: 0

      Why not I think she is stroking something else ;-)

      Oh admit it's funny, you'd laugh if I said " I think_HE_is stroking it!"

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    3. Re:Good idea by cscx · · Score: 1

      Funny because it's true.

    4. Re:Good idea by aborchers · · Score: 1
      ... for the rules of English state that the male pronouns are used for cases in which the sex of the object in question is unknown.


      I'd be interested in a citation for those rules...

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    5. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I threw away my second grade english book a long time ago, sorry.

    6. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate reading stuff where the author switches between male and female pronouns. Maybe they are trying to be cute, clever, or just weird for the sake of being weird, but it's just fucking annoying.

      If you think playing with pronouns like this is bad, don't read everything2. What a wank-fest.

    7. Re:Good idea by the_consumer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There isn't one. The AC is pulling it out of her ass. Also, I'm married, not an idiot, and naturally cute, so I could give a fuck about appearing sensitive to women on an anonymous geek forum. Of course it is left to you to figure out my gender. You get 2 guesses.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    8. Re:Good idea by aborchers · · Score: 1
      I threw away my second grade english book a long time ago, sorry.


      Guess you threw away the history book that said Columbus discovered America, too...

      Are you always such a dismissive ass to people who ask questions? You must be the light of the party. Of course, noone will recognize you with that AC bag on your head, so flame away.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    9. Re:Good idea by aborchers · · Score: 1
      I could give a fuck about appearing sensitive to women on an anonymous geek forum


      Not much point in it anyway, is there. ;-)

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    10. Re:Good idea by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      Not much point on so many levels...

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    11. Re:Good idea by the_consumer · · Score: 1
      Where was the switch? I only used one pronoun, kind of difficult to switch modes, don't ya think.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    12. Re:Good idea by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

      Shine a light on a cockroach, the cockroach goes the other way. Surround a cockroach with light, and there's no place to hide.
      Put virus-writers on milk cartons, my bet is that they won't do it again. They don't want to get stoned by an impassioned mob.

      It's similar to spammers. If Ralsky is on a street corner someone identified him to the public as a spammer, I wonder how long until the police and/or ambulance arrive?

      --
      -- No sig for you!
    13. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd be interested in a citation for those rules...

      I'm not sure it would make any different to you, but look here. It says,

      Usage Problem. Used to refer to a person whose gender is unspecified or unknown: "He who desires but acts not, breeds pestilence" (William Blake).

      I agree the rule should be changed, but to deny it was the rule for hundreds of years is stupid.

    14. Re:Good idea by harmonica · · Score: 1

      If Ralsky is on a street corner someone identified him to the public as a spammer, I wonder how long until the police and/or ambulance arrive?

      Don't be too sure. Lynch mobs aren't what they used to be. Back in my day...

    15. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reference is counter to the constant drone of masculine reference, see psychology & repitetion

      A way to look at it is "optimized language", being able to communicate through meaning or expression by relying on previous common conditioning. Make-up, maxipads and the news lady usually rely on the same function in reverse.

      Doing some searching through google, most reconized femminist organizations have taken what could be concidered an anti-female stance. At least when compared to what television perpetuates. I guess the advertisers don't need them any more.

    16. Re:Good idea by the_consumer · · Score: 1
      But the article shines no light on the cockroach, instead putting a spotlight on the mess it made, while applauding the impressiveness of the feat.

      The article surmizes that the writer is "no longer satisfied with short-lived notoriety or simple mischief". Giving the writer the notoriety she craves by calling her the 42nd most powerful person in technology only spurs her on.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    17. Re:Good idea by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      They don't want to get stoned by an impassioned mob.

      Uhh, I kinda do.

      Wait...

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    18. Re:Good idea by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that citation, if not for your editorializing about whether it makes a difference to me. Believe it or not, I didn't ask the question to start a flame war over gender politics, but because I have an interest in linguistics.

      The usage essay at the bottom of that page was an interesting read. I recall once hearing about an attempt to force the evolution of the language with a third gender neutral pronoun (I think the substitution for he/she was te) but that obviously never got far enough along to even warrant mention.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    19. Re:Good idea by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      Probably no more than Time naming Hitler man of the year back in the 40's...it's a list of influential people, not good, righteous, people responsible for advancing our society.

      --trb

    20. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From this page:

      Usage Note: Traditionally the pronouns he, him, and his have been used as generic or gender-neutral singular pronouns, as in A novelist should write about what he knows best and No one seems to take any pride in his work anymore. Since the early 20th century, however, this usage has come under increasing criticism for reflecting and perpetuating gender stereotyping. Defenders of the traditional usage have argued that the masculine pronouns he, his, and him can be used generically to refer to men and women. This analysis of the generic use of he is linguistically doubtful. If he were truly a gender-neutral form, we would expect that it could be used to refer to the members of any group containing both men and women. But in fact the English masculine form is an odd choice when it refers to a female member of such a group. There is something plainly disconcerting about sentences such as Each of the stars of As Good As It Gets [i.e., Jack Nicholson and Helen Hunt] won an Academy Award for his performance. In this case, the use of his forces the reader to envision a single male who stands as the representative member of the group, a picture that is at odds with the image that comes to mind when we picture the stars of As Good As It Gets. Thus he is not really a gender-neutral pronoun; rather, it refers to a male who is to be taken as the representative member of the group referred to by its antecedent. The traditional usage, then, is not simply a grammatical convention; it also suggests a particular pattern of thought. It is clear that many people now routinely construct their remarks to avoid generic he, usually using one of two strategies: changing to the plural, so they is used (which is often the easiest solution) or using compound and coordinate forms such as he/she or he or she (which can be cumbersome in sustained use). In some cases, the generic pronoun can simply be dropped or changed to an article with no change in meaning. The sentence A writer who draws on personal experience for material should not be surprised if reviewers seize on that fact is complete as it stands and requires no pronoun before the word material. The sentence Every student handed in his assignment is just as clear when written Every student handed in the assignment. Not surprisingly, the opinion of the Usage Panel in such matters is mixed. While 37 percent actually prefer the generic his in the sentence A taxpayer who fails to disclose the source of ___ income can be prosecuted under the new law, 46 percent prefer a coordinate form like his or her; 7 percent felt that no pronoun was needed in the sentence; 2 percent preferred an article, usually the; and another 2 percent overturned tradition by advocating the use of generic her, a strategy that brings the politics of language to the reader's notice. Thus a clear majority of the Panel prefers something other than his. The writer who chooses to use generic he and its inflected forms in the face of the strong trend away from that usage may be viewed as deliberately calling attention to traditional gender roles or may simply appear to be insensitive. See Usage Note at each. See Usage Note at every. See Usage Note at neither. See Usage Note at one. See Usage Note at she. See Usage Note at they.
    21. Re:Good idea by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      If you hadn't invoked Goodwin's law, I'd probably point out that there are many who view that editorial decision as misguided for much the same reason. But you did, so I won't.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    22. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, women will often use "she" which sometimes catches you off guard when reading. When an author goes back and forth between he and she that can get pretty confusing but what really sucks are documents (usually legal documents) written using he/she everywhere - that is just painful to read (as if legal documents weren't kinda funny looking in a general sort of way)

      Why not just change the rules and make "it" a valid substitute for "he/she" situations? ;)

    23. Re:Good idea by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      Why not just change the rules and make "it" a valid substitute for "he/she" situations?

      That's even more annoying... it gets confusing as to whether they're talking about a person or a situation or an object...

      You can usually figure out what is meant from context, but that usually means constant re-reading. I like reading and all, but not so much that I want to read the same paragraph three times just to get the idea. Communication should be the goal, not "political correctness" (a meaningless term, used to mean "something that doesn't offend dipshits").

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
  23. Sigh by Lane.exe · · Score: 1
    Mirrors, anyone? 15 comments and already /.ed.

    --
    IAALS.
    1. Re:Sigh by ideatrack · · Score: 0

      Article text:

      No 5. Linus Torvalds creator of Linux
      Last year's position : 21

      Hero of the open source movement, geek made good, thorn in Bill Gates' side - there are so many reasons why people vote for Linus Torvalds each year.

      In a nutshell it's because he embodies the idea that there is always another way, an antidote to the Microsofts of this world, evidence that the idea of the 'community' within IT is still there. If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls.

      Torvalds started work on the Linux kernel while he was at university in Helsinki in 1991 and since then it has been taken up and developed as a serious alternative to proprietary software.

      In truth Torvalds best work is in the past but he got the ball rolling and he continues to be an Agenda Setter because he is the very embodiment of the open source community. A vote for Torvalds is not a vote for the man but more a vote for what he represents.

      Linux now poses a major threat to Windows and a series of adoptions in the past year, especially at governmental level (and there are more expected in the coming year) means that threat is only set to increase.

      Rumour has it he's a Guinness man as well.

  24. I think that's deserving. by Nijika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And he's such a regular guy (seemingly) that it probably gives him a bit of a shudder to read that. I don't envy the position Linus is in though, I mean looking back, he didn't set out with the goal of being worshipped globally by computer nerds, he just had this re-write of Minix he was working on. Eesh!

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  25. Jobs is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jobs' role is overrated. Some Mac "innovations" (like pinhole to eject media) no-one ever follows. He makes a colorful splash with his colorful consoles, which end up meaningless in the tech world (the candy-colored iMac look had more influence on staplers and George Foreman grills than computers).

    Due to the locked-in relationship of the hardware and software, his influence is limited for the most part to the tiny Mac world. This could change as soon as his music store goes beyond its limited beta situation.

    1. Re:Jobs is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son, I've had bugs more influential than you ever will be.

    2. Re:Jobs is overrated by rampant+mac · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "He makes a colorful splash with his colorful consoles, which end up meaningless in the tech world (the candy-colored iMac look had more influence on staplers and George Foreman grills than computers)."

      I'm not sure the above is just a troll, but Jobs' influence has dramtically changed the landscape of computing as we know it. Those fruity iMacs you mention not only changed the way we "look" at computers, but also consumables as well. After the iMac's debut, you couldn't swing a dead cat around your head without hitting something with translucent, colored plastic (sorry cat lovers).

      What about OS X? How many web sites not only outright copy the look of Apple's own site? Or products that mimic the Aqua goodness? Maybe sites like Macromedia or desktop environments like KDE.

      Big deal, right? What else has he done?

      His Macintosh gave us a GUI, mouse and pointers. His NeXT machine gave us the World Wide Web. His iMac gave us a simple network appliance. His OS X now gives us a UNIX environment grandparents, moms and teenagers can use.

      Quite a set of lifetime achievements.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    3. Re:Jobs is overrated by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      [snip] .. you couldn't swing a dead cat around your head .. [snip] .. (sorry cat lovers).

      My mommy told me not to play with my food.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Jobs is overrated by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      His Macintosh gave us a GUI, mouse and pointers. His NeXT machine gave us the World Wide Web. His iMac gave us a simple network appliance. His OS X now gives us a UNIX environment grandparents, moms and teenagers can use.

      When the Macintosh came to my house and tried to give me a mouse and a GUI, I told him "It's already been done. GE beat you to it."

      When the NeXT machine came to my house to give me the World Wide Web, I told him "a NeXT machine creating the world wide web is like Al Gore inventing the internet. Sorry, but a machine didn't give us the World Wide Web, people did."

      When the iMac came to my house to give me a network appliance, I told him "What's the point? I already got a PC, and it works with everyone else's crap. And it cost the same."

      When OSX came to my house to tell me that I now have a UNIX environment that grandparents, moms, and teenagers can use, I told him "I've already got Linux. OS X doesn't do anything Linux doesn't do."

      Quite a set of lifetime achievements.

      Just parallel development. There's fundamentally no difference between Steve jobs and Bill Gates, except that Bill Gates was able to hide during the desktop wars of the '80s, and it was those wars, in fact, that cleared Jobs out of the picture and paved the way for Gates and Co.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:Jobs is overrated by lysium · · Score: 1
      Wow. He should run for office on the ticket with Al Gore; from what you say, the entire IT field was created between the two of them.

      ==========

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    6. Re:Jobs is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple didn't "invent" the GUI- they were only the first company to actually sell it to customers and make it usable.

      Who cares what's in the research labs? Apple brought it to market first. Compare the Alto to the first Mac, if you want to see what design- and not just technology- will bring you. And even before the Mac, the Apple ][ was the best PC on the market.

      And OS X does lots, lots, lots that Linux doesn't do. Like run useful and well designed applications, to name the most obvious. It's easier to maintain, it's well-organized, it uses application bundles so simple that all you do to install an app is copy one file, etc, etc.

      My name is John, and I switched from Windows to Linux to OS X.

    7. Re:Jobs is overrated by jmordoj · · Score: 1

      You Frogot some things:

      Steve Jobs is such a trend setter, that he MADE USB be the standard in low speed conectios. Before the iMac, nobody ever knew pc motherboard came with USB, windows didin't suport it, the motherboards did have it, but there where no compatible devices, the iMac made USB what it is today by only having THAT tipe of conection.

      Steve also focused very much in sound cards, I don't think many people remember this, but it was YEARS before pc come with a sound card and all of the multimedia stuf, he made the fist mac ship with integrated sound.

      Steve was also, a very importan driving force in all of the "TrueType" fonts development, he belived that computers should have "beautifull fonts" so we can write "beautifull books"

    8. Re:Jobs is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Mac "innovations" (like pinhole to eject media) no-one ever follows

      Every CD/DVD-ROM drive has a eject pinhole.

    9. Re:Jobs is overrated by hackrobat · · Score: 1
  26. Negate? No. by schon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It goes on to say: "In truth Torvalds best work is in the past"... which seems to negate their own argument for having him in there.

    Why does that negate their own argument?

    Power doesn't mean "how much have you coded recently", it means "how much influence do you weild."

    Bill Gates hasn't coded anything in over 10 years, but he's made the list - are you suggesting he's not a power either?

  27. List is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This list can't be right. No repo companies or real estate liquidators are to be found on this list.

  28. Ranked by Yanray · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought CowboyNeal would at least have ranked this year.

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  29. I haven't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I think Andrew Tannenbaum must be more influential and I know if I read it he won't even be mentioned. After all, Linux is obsolete...

  30. Carly whatshername by mccalli · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Well, at least silicon.com's techies have the same opinion of her that I do.

    On looking for her biography, I currently get a 'page cannot be found' message...

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Carly whatshername by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 0
      On looking for her biography, I currently get a 'page cannot be found' message...

      Page? Rumour has it the entire backing store failed.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Carly whatshername by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you mean Crazy Foolerina? It's amazing what a bad chef can do with good ingredients, and she's managed, over the course of her tenure, to pretty much sell off, cancel, or otherwise destroy everything that made HP even remotely special. Have fun hawking those printers, Carly!

    3. Re:Carly whatshername by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      they messed up the link it's
      http://specials.silicon.com/as2003/list10.html
      not the
      http://specials.silicon.com/as2003/list10.hrm it's linked too

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    4. Re:Carly whatshername by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the fixed link - interesting. It seems even the panel don't know why they've put her there.

      Cheers,
      Ian

  31. Slashdotted by ParnBR · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems we are the most influential people over silicon.com servers.

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  32. Well... yeah! by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course Linus wouldn't be the most "powerful" - he lets others make up their own damn minds. He doesn't own any companies, and he lets others use his ideas with only the agreement to give credit where credit is due, and use derrivative ideas in just the same way. The power is not in the man, but in the ideas. This "ranking" shouldn't be counted as an insult to open source in any way - powerful men are not a particularly valid way to rank ideas.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Well... yeah! by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      Definitely. Just because most of his work was done in the past doesn't mean that he doesn't continue to work today. He just changed the direction his skills went.

      Remember the Transmeta Crusoe? Linus was hired to work on that processor. Now he's been permitted to take a leave of absence and go work at the OSDL, where he can write code for the 2.7 kernels.

      IMO Linus deserved number 4.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:Well... yeah! by Sigl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...he lets others make up their own damn minds. He doesn't own any companies, and he lets others use his ideas with only the agreement to give credit where credit is due,...

      Often people choose Bill Gates way because alternatives have been eliminated. People are choosing the Linus way because they want to. Which power would you rather have?

      The power is not in the man, but in the ideas.

      It's not a list of powerful ideas. It's a list of powerful men. Because of what Linus has come up with in the past thousands+ will stop and listen to what he has to say about anything. I definitely consider that power in the man. I would give him that power BECAUSE he proved to me Free software is a great idea, not because Free software is a great idea. Although I agree the idea of free software can change peoples minds about how it should work which is definitely power in the idea.

  33. Holy cow! dont do that to me! by koi69 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that freaked out that there was a LINK named "sobig virus?"

    Gad, I havent had my coffe yet and i am shaking!

  34. Posters Of Linus Torvalds by CastrTroy · · Score: 0, Funny

    Does anybody know where I might acquire a poster of Mr. Torvalds? I would seriously put up a poster of him, but I don't believe that I have ever seen a poster. I'd like to be able to get one, without having it shipped, the dimensions of a poster probably make them a lot of trouble to ship. Anyone know where I can get a Linus, or Linux poster In the Ottawa area?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Posters Of Linus Torvalds by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1



      I would pay serious money for a poster of Linus dressed up in a penguin costume!

      --
      "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
      GeneralEmergency
    2. Re:Posters Of Linus Torvalds by zenpiglet · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right?

      Or maybe you're trying for the related list of "Sadest Losers in Technology 2003"

    3. Re:Posters Of Linus Torvalds by pmz · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know where I might acquire a poster of Mr. Torvalds?

      Make your own. Now your only question remaining is "Bunny suit or S&M leather?"

    4. Re:Posters Of Linus Torvalds by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 1

      the dimensions of a poster probably make them a lot of trouble to ship

      um no...they roll the poster and put it in a cardboard sleeve and mail it .

      Linux Kernel Map Poster
      Gentoo Linux Poster
      Google for Linux Posters

      as for a poster of Torvalds, I cant help you as I have an aversion to having posters of People on my walls, Landscapes/Paintings and cool Advertisment/Techie type stuff only please.

      --

      --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
    5. Re:Posters Of Linus Torvalds by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      What, like this or maybe this?

      Please email me in private to arrange for the transfer of the serious money, thanks.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    6. Re:Posters Of Linus Torvalds by Bishop923 · · Score: 1

      I think the Photographer should have stopped at 2 pots of coffee that morning...

  35. ID / John Carmack by __aalwyc6372 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say John Carmack is badly missing there. He's been trendsetter since years.

    1. Re:ID / John Carmack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately he is about to earn a Darwin in a groundbreaking experiment.

    2. Re:ID / John Carmack by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      How about Richard Stallman, without whom we probably wouldn't have Free software to begin with.

    3. Re:ID / John Carmack by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1
      "I'd say John Carmack is badly missing there."

      • Robert Cringely
      • Bruce Schneier
      • John Gilmore
      • Richard Stallman
      • Lawrence Lessig
      • Gibson? Greenspun?

      There seems to be a massive predominance of media people (does anyone technical read The Sun?), and grey companies that nobody ever notices (Dell, Oracle, but not Intel or nVidia)

      Good to see Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontiers Foundation there though.
    4. Re:ID / John Carmack by nigelc · · Score: 1
      Probably because Stallman doesn't set agendas at this point.

      He's become a babbling extremist, and has probably done as much harm as good to the open source movement. Especially in the Eastern MA area where many many people have actually met or heard him.

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
  36. 503 Out Of Resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't thank me all at once.

    No 5. Linus Torvalds creator of Linux
    Last year's position : 21

    Hero of the open source movement, geek made good, thorn in Bill Gates' side - there are so many reasons why people vote for Linus Torvalds each year.

    In a nutshell it's because he embodies the idea that there is always another way, an antidote to the Microsofts of this world, evidence that the idea of the 'community' within IT is still there. If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls.

    Torvalds started work on the Linux kernel while he was at university in Helsinki in 1991 and since then it has been taken up and developed as a serious alternative to proprietary software.

    In truth Torvalds best work is in the past but he got the ball rolling and he continues to be an Agenda Setter because he is the very embodiment of the open source community. A vote for Torvalds is not a vote for the man but more a vote for what he represents.

    Linux now poses a major threat to Windows and a series of adoptions in the past year, especially at governmental level (and there are more expected in the coming year) means that threat is only set to increase.

    Rumour has it he's a Guinness man as well.

  37. Desperate for women, huh? by Otter · · Score: 1
    Wow, they must have been really hard up for a third woman to put on the list to go with Naomi Klein. They could barely come up with even a shred of a justification for that one. Someone at the magazine must be part of the "Dude, advertising is just trying to, like, SELL you stuff!" set.

    For that matter, does anyone actually care what Tim Berners-Lee has to say any more? I thought he was just someone they trot out to act like a father figure and talk up his latest unworkable, silly Big New Idea plea for attention, like Vint Cerf. Also, I thought John Malone was in jail...

  38. anyone know... by blackmonday · · Score: 1


    Anyone know where Cowboy Neal ranked?

  39. They should be on People's 50 sexiest men list by cybercrap · · Score: 1, Funny

    Man, us techies are one good looking bunch.

  40. Lara and Xena? What about ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    Buffy, Faith and Willow? Sunnydale may be a big hole in the ground, but let's not forget it's finest (former) inhabitants.

  41. Re:Negate? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bill Gates hasn't coded anything in over 10 years, but he's made the list - are you suggesting he's not a power either?"

    Erase all words after No. 5 and this sentence makes sence.

    johnboy

  42. +1 Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah that's a funny header, don't think i'm gonna RTFA, i'm ROFL..

    1. Re:+1 Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yeah i ain't flamebaiting: header as in the presentation paragraph.

      It's funny how some studies completely lack credibility. You can't just
      mix influential ppl for their money power and the influence the work of
      someone has. It makes no mofoin sense. For money power Jobs
      shouldn't be 1st, etc...

      SoBig author .. roflmao!

  43. No Richard M. Stallman? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    His agenda seem quite influential, much of Linux' success is due to his agenda (through the GPL and software).

    He may not be at the top, but he should be on the list. And above the Sobig author...

    1. Re:No Richard M. Stallman? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      RMS is gnu/influential :)

    2. Re:No Richard M. Stallman? by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      I don't like Stallman... rabid zealots rarely impress me, but, he is incredibly influential in the free software community and in the open source community. He certainly should be on that list.

  44. no RMS? by nuggz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about RMS, he has done a lot of work for Free Software.
    If Linus gets to #5 being the embodiment of Open Source, how can they neglect GNU ?

    1. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone in their right mind programs Visual C++. And who cares about something that's "not Unix" by definition, when Unix is the corporate standard.

    2. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, John (sp?) Carmack of Id. He pretty much drives the entire pc video card industry to innovate.

    3. Re:no RMS? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Its GNU/Linus, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    4. Re:no RMS? by RevMike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What about RMS, he has done a lot of work for Free Software.
      If Linus gets to #5 being the embodiment of Open Source, how can they neglect GNU?
      Linus is influential because he has given very few people cause to dislike him. He avoids taking part in political arguments, he avoids making himself anyone's enemy.

      RMS is a zealot, and for every person he brings into his way, he alienates two others. RMS's influence is limited becaue of the numbers of people that he alienates.

      As a good example of what Linus does right, compare the *BSD community to the Linux community. Regardless of technical merit, Linux has been far more successful while the BSD community forks again and again. Linus is the steady hand that everyone looks to. Linus has stayed above the arguments so that he can have the authority to mediate the arguments, rather than have Linux suffer a fork.

    5. Re:no RMS? by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      Well I do not think RMS has that a big impact on
      technology, more on society.

    6. Re:no RMS? by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As others have pointed out, the people who publish todays articles are pretty clueless about what's actually going on. Not all but many and this is proof of another.

      The author of the results/comments most likely does not know what GNU is and he probably thinks OSS is Linux( not GNU/Linux but just Linux ). His comments about Lara Croft/etc shows that he thinks the OSS community consists mostly of high school kids. The guy is WAY out of date. IMHO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    7. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS' certainly didn't invent GNU to appear in such bullshit rankings.

      Neither did Linus write Linux to appear in such bullshit rankings.

    8. Re:no RMS? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because it's so much fun not giving him proper credit and then watching him foam at the mouth.

      It should be an Olympic event. Tell him you love using Linux to compile code, or using Linux to surf the web. Bonus points if you can get his eyes to roll back into his head or have him gibber in tongues.

      Weaselmancer

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    9. Re:no RMS? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Without LINUX GNU would still be working on HURD. LINUX made GNU, not the other way around. While Linus used a GNU licence, and that process allowed LINUX to be come what it is, LINUX made the whole thing POPULAR, and brought it into the Mainstream.

      It is important to note that LINUX validates GNU, but that doesn't make it more .... influential. Linux's validation is the power, not GNU.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:no RMS? by xchino · · Score: 1

      Right, the number #5 should be said as RMS/Linus.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    11. Re:no RMS? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Don't sell RMS short. He many not write code anymore, but he used to. Many people seem to forget his past technical contributions because of his current in-your-face political commentary.

      I agree theat he's not currently technically influential though.

    12. Re:no RMS? by merdark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "As a good example of what Linus does right, compare the *BSD community to the Linux community. Regardless of technical merit, Linux has been far more successful while the BSD community forks again and again. Linus is the steady hand that everyone looks to. Linus has stayed above the arguments so that he can have the authority to mediate the arguments, rather than have Linux suffer a fork."

      Umm. No. Actually Linux only became popular because of the AT&T lawsuit against BSD right at the start. Once it gained momentum it was hard to shake. Another factor was probably the GPL.

      While a agree that RMS is a zealot, he still managed to convince a LOT of people that GPL is somehow free and good (and that anything corporate is the work of the devil). This helped fuel the already popular Linux.

      By the way, a lot of sharing goes on between the BSD kernels. And Linux does indeed have forks. Each Linux kernel is slightly differet. For instance, Redhat has patches others don't have, and of course there is the ac branch the aa branch etc. Personally, I think the number of distros is a far worse fragmentation problem than having three versions of the kernel.

      Linus is influential mostly because of luck.

    13. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is influential because he has given very few people cause to dislike him. He avoids taking part in political arguments, he avoids making himself anyone's enemy.

      How about Bill Gates? Everybody hates billg and he's still pretty influencial, wouldn't you say? I think Linus is on the list because Linux is popular, that's all.

      I personally think RMS has (in the past) had a much large influence on software than Linus. I think 100 years from now Linus will be remembered as the guy Linux is named after but RMS will be remembered as the father of the Free software movement.

      I don't think either of them have a big influence these days. I know exactly what RMS is going to say on any topic (free software blah blah GNU/Linux blah blah GPL rulez), and I know exactly what Linus is going to say (let's use the best tool for the job, ignore the politics and legalities, RMS sucks blah blah).

      At the end of the day, the politics will win, not the technical feats, so I tend to keep my eye on RMS more.

      Linus has stayed above the arguments so that he can have the authority to mediate the arguments, rather than have Linux suffer a fork.

      Linux is not forked?? There are about 50,000 different Linux kernels and patches and distros out there!! Geez Louise... there's only one FreeBSD distro that I know of.... that's one of Linux's problems, it's not *one thing* that a manager can understand.

    14. Re:no RMS? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      What about RMS, he has done a lot of work for Free Software.

      He was very successful as a programmer and project coordinator, but as an "agenda setter", he wasn't as good. Linux-based distributions made it practical to use the GNU system, but the hype around "Linux" almost completely hid the agenda of the GNU project. Suddenly, other things were more important than free software: writing cool software using cool tools, or being anti-Microsoft. It's a bit sad, but RMS' political message has much less influence than his software (after all, it's quite controversal).

    15. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one FreeBSD, 1.2 million BSDs.

    16. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RMS is a zealot, and for every person he brings into his way, he alienates two others. RMS's influence is limited becaue of the numbers of people that he alienates.

      RMS is a total ass and I can't stand him. However, I'd fight to the death to keep the GPL system. I wish RMS would shut up and stop scaring people away.

      Sorry, an offtopic rant, but I thought I was good proof of your point.

    17. Re:no RMS? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      His comments about Lara Croft/etc shows that he thinks the OSS community consists mostly of high school kids. The guy is WAY out of date. IMHO.

      Yeah, no kidding - I have Anime posters on my walls, and I'm in college! Lara Corft? Sheesh, that is *so* 3 years ago...

    18. Re:no RMS? by Odinson · · Score: 1
      I dunno if anything here fits your skills, but keep checking back. Linux/Unix /senior oriented recruiting seem to be stirring.

      Hope this helps.

    19. Re: no RMS? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Because it's so much fun not giving him proper credit and then watching him foam at the mouth.

      > It should be an Olympic event. Tell him you love using Linux to compile code, or using Linux to surf the web. Bonus points if you can get his eyes to roll back into his head or have him gibber in tongues.

      I think you've already done that by calling it "Linux" rather than "GNU/Linux".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    20. Re:no RMS? by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      Well that was kind of what I tried to say ;-)

    21. Re:no RMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look how long it took them to put Donald Knuth on the list. Agenda setting is for those who stand on the shoulders of giants, not the titans bearing the load. If I was Linus, I wouldn't want to be ranked among such has-beens as Jobs and Gates, and a never-was like Fiorina.

    22. Re:no RMS? by modme2 · · Score: 1

      i disagree, they are both as dependent on each other. what you think MS would have adopted the Linux kernel? SUN?

      i suspect we wouldnt have even heard of linux without GNU.

      the problem is linux sounds cool, GNU doesnt especially when pronounced 'ganoo' - its probably as simple as that.

    23. Re:no RMS? by WNight · · Score: 1

      The ac kernel isn't a fork because it's based on the main kernel and moves with it. It's like my kernel isn't a fork just because I compile with a few patches. A fork is when you diverge with no intent to go back.

      And I don't think RMS had to convince people that corporate is evil, simply that free is the best choice for their own work. I work for a company writing proprietary code by day. It doesn't "want" freedom, nor do I care if it gets it. But the code I write at night I write for people to share. Sharing code to me means that you can add to it, but your changes must remain open. It'd be like if I wrote a song, you made a few good changes to it, and then you sang a song that was 95% mine, but didn't let me sing your version.

      That's what companies do with source code, when allowed, because everything they do has to go past legal and the lawyers will always choose to do nothing, when possible, because it's the road of least resistance. Thus, I believe you can't really share with companies (and expect them to share with you) unless you require it.

    24. Re:no RMS? by merdark · · Score: 1

      "Sharing code to me means that you can add to it, but your changes must remain open."

      Sure, and this is very different from *free* code. You do realize that if every piece of software was GPL, you'd have no job right? You seem to hate the very industry that allows you to live!

      So what if a company takes your code and doesn't give anything back? It doesn't change the code you released. The only reason you would want to disallow this is to try to compete with the companies and force them out of business. Doing so would also probably land you on Welfare, so you couldn't even afford a computer to code on.

      This is why I don't see the GPL as a good thing, and dont' agree with it theory behind it. But I'm clearly in the minority.

    25. Re:no RMS? by WNight · · Score: 1

      If every piece of software was GPLed I'd still have a job. I customize existing software so that it fits my company's needs better. One guy I worked with spent a few weeks tweaking Bugzilla, that paid his rent and kept him off welfare, yet it was GPLed software.

      And yeah, it doesn't harm me if someone uses my code without paying or helping out the community but it's a freeloading thing to do and I don't like freeloaders. You wouldn't want to support me if I decided to live on welfare, why should I write software and let some company sell it if they aren't willing to give something back? I could, I just don't feel that it benefits anyone who deserves it.

      I really think that even if all software was public domain (more then GPLed) with no hope of copyright, that most programmers would still have a job. People want products, Products need code, companies make and sell products. The economics would change but code doesn't write itself, someone would have to and I'm one of those someones.

      Besides, if a company can't pay huge salaries to a crack team of coders and come out with something hacked together by a bunch of volunteers, they don't deserve to make money.

  45. search? by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    Is there a search on this site? I can't seem to find my name... =P

  46. Going down... by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 2, Informative

    So here's the Google Cache

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
  47. Well, I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new Scandinavian overlords!

  48. Vajpayee ?? by Vedanti · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The list has India's prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee at 8th.

    India's boom - largely engineered by Vajpayee - means some analysts are predicting the country could face its own IT skills crisis over the next five years.

    Nothing can be further from truth. Personally Vajpayee has had no effect on IT in India. He has no ideas or plans for the future, as far as IT is concerned. I think Narayana Murthy would have been a better choice.

    I doubt the list is a well researched list.

    --
    karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
    1. Re:Vajpayee ?? by donutello · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even Chandrababu Naidu would have a legitimate claim to a higher spot than Vajpayee. This list definitely has not done its research.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    2. Re:Vajpayee ?? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I thought that he was almost a pure "technocrat"?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:Vajpayee ?? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      CBN's great for boosting investment profiles and, certainly, has some very interesting ideas for governance, but it's important to remember that he has had limited influence on tech policy and philosophy (as opposed to investment policy; he will, and has, readily supported other industries as well, if it brings more investment to the state).

      Case in point:- I doubt if anyone has ever used iLeap Telugu that the government so generously bought and is distributing on its website. (I would have given the direct link to it, but the Telugu website doesn't use Unicode fonts and probably has IE-specific rendering)

      Narayana Murthy is a great poster-boy for Indian entrepreneurship, but just to point out, GoI itself has some very enterprising people influencing IT policy. Arun Shourie, for one, comes to my mind.

      (Actually, it's pretty strange for me to point this out; I generally agree more with CBN than I do with Shourie, but all the same, thought it was an important distinction to make)

    4. Re:Vajpayee ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, Vajpayee has had a tremendous influence on the IT boom as well as in creating an environment conducive to Business. Thanks to his Finance and Industrial ministers, they have literally been ripping out the layers of red-tape constantly. Looking past the political masks this team has to wear, they have done some of the most amazing work at the Central Govt. Hoping the Congress (when it comes to power) will not roll this back in the name of nationalism or some such reasoning.

    5. Re:Vajpayee ?? by raggy · · Score: 1

      Not true at all. Narayana Murthy is like Bill Gates (an opportunist who took the opportunity and the risks to make it big.) Vajpayee is like Reagan/Bush (or some such Republican) who has made it his important Agenda to peel off/rip out the huge amounts of red-tape that drags the Indian economy.

      His Finanace and Industrial ministers are incredibly astute people who have been busy reducing the size and hence the corruption of the Central Govt. for some time now. What we are seeing is the fruition of these efforts in terms of the opening of the market, better infrastructures, less corruption, and hence a more conducive environment for Businesses.

      For any Business person in India this is a well known fact that BJP has made very good strides in turning to a Capitalistic rather than pseudo-socialistic infrastructure. Of course, if we read popular media, BJP is nothing but a political party desperately clinging to power.

      Hoping that the Congress Party (when it comes to power) will not roll back these changes in the name of Nationalism or some such excuse.

    6. Re:Vajpayee ?? by Vedanti · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You are a BJP / RSS supporter who hates Congress Party. Or you have not updated your politics after 1991.

      Narayana Murthy is like Bill Gates (an opportunist who took the opportunity and the risks to make it big.)

      Definitely not. Murthy had excellent education (from IIT Kanpur) ... he was not a drop out. He struggled to get to where he is today ... and it didn't happen because a big company somehow chose a program he was marketing.

      Vajpayee is like Reagan/Bush (or some such Republican) who has made it his important Agenda to peel off/rip out the huge amounts of red-tape that drags the Indian economy

      Just like Reagan / Bush, BJP has no idea how to be conservative when it comes to economy. They have not cut red tape. They just let their business friends profiteer under crony capitalism. If ever there was anyone who tried to cut red tape it was Dr Manmohan Singh.

      BJP's top priority is to establish a "Hindu" nation. Their preference to stirring up communal issues at the expense of economic issues is well known. Their brand of hate that supported slaughter of innocent people in Gujarat can't possibly be good for the economy.

      His Finanace and Industrial ministers are incredibly astute people who have been busy reducing the size and hence the corruption of the Central Govt.

      Only a very partisan BJP follower could use such words. Esp. considering that the industrial minister Maran has been bedridden for the last few months and the govt which is supposed to be industry friendly does not even appoint a different miniter (may be they know, it is best when their is no commerce miniter). BTW, India still ranks 83rd on the list of transparent (i.e. non-corrupt) countries.

      For any Business person in India this is a well known fact that BJP has made very good strides in turning to a Capitalistic rather than pseudo-socialistic infrastructure.

      Just compare the number of restrictions lifted by Manmohan Singh and what this govt has done. Platitutes are no alternative to bold policy changes. Under this govt. liberalization has all but stalled.

      Hoping that the Congress Party (when it comes to power) will not roll back these changes in the name of Nationalism or some such excuse.

      It is the BJP which cries nationalism or "level playing field" and raises tariffs to protect its industrial friends like Rahul Bajaj.

      --
      karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
    7. Re:Vajpayee ?? by Vedanti · · Score: 1


      Vajpayee is a career politician. He has been in politics for the last 47 years. He is (was ?) a great orator, a very moderate leader in a right wing party and a part-time poet.

      --
      karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
    8. Re:Vajpayee ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of the wrong kind of Boom. The author was referring to the nuclear weapons.

    9. Re:Vajpayee ?? by raggy · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      You have made some good points as well as wrong guesses ;) I am not a supporter of RSS for sure nor BJP (the way you have portrayed BJP.) Nor am I an anti-Congress dude. And I have worked for Infosys.

      Without getting into the tiring details of politics and religious zeal, the main point I was trying to make was that Vajpayee is indeed a good pick as someone who is setting a good Agenda. And yes, what BJP did in Gujarat was reprehensible, by being a silent spectator. One of the problems with Vajpayee is his loyalty to party seems higher than to the people, but at the same time he has this incredible earthy-ness to him that makes him a good leader.

      And you are plumb mistaken about liberalization having stalled. In fact, even the Time and the Post have covered the achievements of Vajpayee. And yes, Manmohan Singh was making strides that were considered very good in his time. And yes, like in any party, there are Hawks and then there are moderates. What are you ? :)

  49. Powerful? by nakhla · · Score: 1

    Influential? Definitely. Powerful? Uhh, no. In reality, there are still many more people in the tech world who have considerably more power than he does. After all, exactly how much money have Linux companies actually made? It's a pittence compared to the other big players out there. I'd argue he has much more influence than he has actual power in the industry, especially since anyone can modify his product without giving him a second thought.

    1. Re:Powerful? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why he's so influential. He released a product that anybody can modify.....

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:Powerful? by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

      I think you are automatically assuming money equals power.

      The Sultan of Brunei makes much more than the President of the US. But which person has the most power?

      Ghandi and his followers had much less money than the British empire and look who won.

      IMHO the true measure of power is a persons ability to get X resources (usually people) to perform a certain task or goal.
      The higher your X value is compared to others, the more power you have.

  50. full list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. Steve Jobs
    2. Bill Gates
    3. Greg Dyke
    4. Hu Jintao
    5. Linus Torvalds
    6. Roger Cole
    7. Sam Palmisano
    8. Atal Behari Vajpayee
    9. Peter Gershon
    10. Carly Fiorina
    11. Rupert Murdoch
    12. Michael Dell
    13. Arun Sarin
    14. Richard Granger
    15. Fred von Lohmann
    16. Eric Schmidt
    17. David Levin
    18. Stephen Carter
    19. Steve Linford
    20. Christian Ude
    21. Greg Aharonian
    22. Scott McNealy
    23. Terry Semel
    24. Sergey Brin
    25. Ben Verwaayen
    26. Rod Aldridge
    27. Stelios Haji-Ioannou
    28. Ian Foster
    29. Dmitri Sklyarov
    30. David Blunkett
    31. Erich Gamma
    32. Jeff Bezos
    33. Donna Dubinsky
    34. Donald E Knuth
    35. Masayoshi Son
    36. Michael Gough
    37. Keiji Tachikawa
    38. Marc Benioff
    39. Sir John Sulston
    40. Larry Ellison
    41. Stephen Hill
    42. SoBig author
    43. Naomi Klein
    44. Henning Kagermann
    45. Mario Monti
    46. Ulrich Schumacher
    47. Tim Berners-Lee
    48. Steve Ballmer
    49. John Malone
    50. Michael Moritz

  51. Life, the Universe, and Everything. by Qwell · · Score: 1

    As an interesting aside, the writer of the Sobig virus even makes it in at Number 42...
    The answer, to the almighty question. Apparently, the reason we exist is to write viruses. You didn't actually believe it was 6 by 9, did you?

    --
    As of 10/06/03, I hate COBOL developers.
  52. Power and Influence do not = $$$ by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the biggest problems with a lot of people today is that they equate economic success with success in general. However, in the case of Apple and Steve Jobs, the success is in pushing new boundaries that other companies didn't want to touch. Apple has been VERY influential (and therefore Steve Jobs). They popularized the GUI, they brought a sense of style to computing (which is very important regardless of what anyone may think), they shifted the look of the box itself from the ugly beige box to the sleek designer models and now they are bringing Unix and 64 bit processing to the consumer (It could be argued that Sony did this with the Playstation).

    The Linux crowd and Torvalds have been hugely successful in starting a movement away from proprietary OSes and again making this movement more visible. Of course *BSD was there first as well as GNU, but with Linux the concept was popularized among the clued in folks in the IT world. Whether you like Tovalds or not, you cannot refute that he has influenced the IT world tremendously with his work.

    The best thing is that neither Jobs nor Torvalds needed to be the dominant market leader to influence anyone. There is more power in thought than money. That is the way things should be everywhere.

    1. Re:Power and Influence do not = $$$ by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      they shifted the look of the box itself from the ugly beige box to the sleek designer models

      Some would argue that they 'stole' that idea from SGI. Look at some of the case designs of machines that run Irix from ten years ago.

      Not that 'shape and color of case' are really innovative. 'Style' is a matter, significantly, of planned obsolescence in other industries.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  53. Stupid comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The most influential are on wall street.

    postscript

    Actually I've found most members/users of open source (averaged) take the most respectful stance to women I've seen from any other group (including pro fem/left/right/religious agenda groups). All with little to no effort, it does seem quite natural.

    I'm kind of curious what kind of carry over or representation there is to the larger population. Diversity is not something open source population lacks.

    1. Re:Stupid comment. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Actually I've found most members/users of open source (averaged) take the most respectful stance to women I've seen from any other group (including pro fem/left/right/religious agenda groups). All with little to no effort, it does seem quite natural.
      Because of our limited interaction with women perhaps? :-D
  54. Copy of article by breman · · Score: 3, Informative

    No 5. Linus Torvalds creator of Linux
    Last year's position : 21

    Hero of the open source movement, geek made good, thorn in Bill Gates' side - there are so many reasons why people vote for Linus Torvalds each year.

    In a nutshell it's because he embodies the idea that there is always another way, an antidote to the Microsofts of this world, evidence that the idea of the 'community' within IT is still there. If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls.

    Torvalds started work on the Linux kernel while he was at university in Helsinki in 1991 and since then it has been taken up and developed as a serious alternative to proprietary software.

    In truth Torvalds best work is in the past but he got the ball rolling and he continues to be an Agenda Setter because he is the very embodiment of the open source community. A vote for Torvalds is not a vote for the man but more a vote for what he represents.

    Linux now poses a major threat to Windows and a series of adoptions in the past year, especially at governmental level (and there are more expected in the coming year) means that threat is only set to increase.

    Rumour has it he's a Guinness man as well.

    1. Re:Copy of article by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Linus moving up from 21st to 5th tells you more about the fortunes of the people moving down than about him.

    2. Re: Copy of article by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Hero of the open source movement, geek made good

      You misspelled "god".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  55. Karma Whoring by Eslyjah · · Score: 0, Informative

    1. Steve Jobs 26. Rod Aldridge
    2. Bill Gates 27. Stelios Haji-Ioannou
    3. Greg Dyke 28. Ian Foster
    4. Hu Jintao 29. Dmitri Sklyarov
    5. Linus Torvalds 30. David Blunkett
    6. Roger Cole 31. Erich Gamma
    7. Sam Palmisano 32. Jeff Bezos
    8. Atal Behari Vajpayee 33. Donna Dubinsky
    9. Peter Gershon 34. Donald E Knuth
    10. Carly Fiorina 35. Masayoshi Son
    11. Rupert Murdoch 36. Michael Gough
    12. Michael Dell 37. Keiji Tachikawa
    13. Arun Sarin 38. Marc Benioff
    14. Richard Granger 39. Sir John Sulston
    15. Fred von Lohmann 40. Larry Ellison
    16. Eric Schmidt 41. Stephen Hill
    17. David Levin 42. SoBig author
    18. Stephen Carter 43. Naomi Klein
    19. Steve Linford 44. Henning Kagermann
    20. Christian Ude 45. Mario Monti
    21. Greg Aharonian 46. Ulrich Schumacher
    22. Scott McNealy 47. Tim Berners-Lee
    23. Terry Semel 48. Steve Ballmer
    24. Sergey Brin 49. John Malone
    25. Ben Verwaayen 50. Michael Moritz

    1. Re:Karma Whoring by Bendebecker · · Score: 4, Informative

      The list isn't even aligned right! What kind of geek are you!
      1. Steve Jobs 26. Rod Aldridge
      2. Bill Gates 27. Stelios Haji-Ioannou
      3. Greg Dyke 28. Ian Foster
      4. Hu Jintao 29. Dmitri Sklyarov
      5. Linus Torvalds 30. David Blunkett
      6. Roger Cole 31. Erich Gamma
      7. Sam Palmisano 32. Jeff Bezos
      8. Atal Behari Vajpayee 33. Donna Dubinsky
      9. Peter Gershon 34. Donald E Knuth
      10. Carly Fiorina 35. Masayoshi Son
      11. Rupert Murdoch 36. Michael Gough
      12. Michael Dell 37. Keiji Tachikawa
      13. Arun Sarin 38. Marc Benioff
      14. Richard Granger 39. Sir John Sulston
      15. Fred von Lohmann 40. Larry Ellison
      16. Eric Schmidt 41. Stephen Hill
      17. David Levin 42. SoBig author
      18. Stephen Carter 43. Naomi Klein
      19. Steve Linford 44. Henning Kagermann
      20. Christian Ude 45. Mario Monti
      21. Greg Aharonian 46. Ulrich Schumacher
      22. Scott McNealy 47. Tim Berners-Lee
      23. Terry Semel 48. Steve Ballmer
      24. Sergey Brin 49. John Malone
      25. Ben Verwaayen 50. Michael Moritz

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re: Karma Whoring by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > The list isn't even aligned right! What kind of geek are you!

      You mistake "anal retentive" (should that have a hyphen?) with "geek".

      Anal retainers align the columns; a geek he would have numbered them 0 - 49 instead of 1 - 50.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Karma Whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The list isn't even aligned right! What kind of geek are you!"

      Your numbering system starts at 1.

    4. Re:Karma Whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *CUE* {A-TEAM THEMESONG}
      11. Rupert Murdoch
      */CUE*

      *CUE* {GET ON YOUR FEET}
      48. Steve Ballmer
      */CUE*

      PS: I Wonder who is at the bottom of the list?

      510,940. Columbo ...

      999,998. ET: Extra Testicle (Cheech & Chong)
      999,999. Ralph "JewHater" Nader
      1,000,000 J0nKatz

  56. Getting a poster shipped by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Getting a poster shipped is no problem. The vendor rolls it up, puts it in a postal tube, and ships that.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  57. are you sure? by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls."

    Are you sure it wouldn't be Ellen Feiss?

    1. Re:are you sure? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure your realize this, but the girl was / is 15 years old...

      I'm sorry, but geek and pedo don't go together.... at least not all of the time :D

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  58. HMM, slightly suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stallman, Woz? These guy's missing from that list makes that list invalid. Whoever came up with it know not wherefore he speaks.

    -eSmith.

  59. Linus near the top by the_crowbar · · Score: 1

    For someone like me who started using Linux at approximately the same time as I started working in IT, Linus (through Linux) has been one of the most influential people in the technology related part of my life.

    Linux has taught me more about computers than even my 3 1/2 years on a helpdesk(win98/NT). The free exchange of ideas, introduced to me through Linux, has shaped much more than my technology life and I can even see examples of it in other areas of my life.

    In summary, Linus being one of the most influential men in technology sounds correct to me.

    -the_crowbar
    --
    Have you read the Moderator Guidelines
  60. Groveling? Hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no, he actually has the Unix world exercising the greatest self-restraint not to punch him in the nose.

  61. oh well, the vogons can blow up the earth now... by barton · · Score: 1

    As an interesting aside, the writer of the Sobig virus even makes it in at Number 42..."

    Aha. So that's the question to which the answer is 42...

  62. More importantly... by Soulfader · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... but you can reasonably expect to sit down and have a beer with him after work if you're in the right city. Can you say the same about numbers one through four?

    And more importantly, you might actually want to. I quote the article:

    Rumour has it he's a Guinness man as well.
    How many of the top 4 are closet Bud Light drinkers? =)
    1. Re:More importantly... by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 4, Funny

      At an annual brewmaster's convention, the brewmasters of Budweiser, Miller, and Guinness get together after-hours at a bar.

      The Budweiser brewmaster tells the bartender, "I'll have a Budweiser, the King of Beers." And the bartender pours him a Budweiser.

      The Miller brewmaster tells the bartender, "I'll have a Miller, thank you." And the bartender pours him a Miller.

      The Guinness brewmaster shrugs his shoulders and tells the bartender, "I'll have a water, please." The bartender pours him a glass of water. In response to the Budweiser and Miller brewmasters' questioning glances, the Guinness brewmaster says, "Well, if you boys aren't drinking, then neither will I."

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    2. Re: More importantly... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > At an annual brewmaster's convention, the brewmasters of Budweiser, Miller, and Guinness get together after-hours at a bar. ... ... ... "Well, if you boys aren't drinking, then neither will I."

      In't somebody supposed to jump out of an airplane before the joke is over?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:More importantly... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      Okay, that says it all that I don't recognise the name of the President of China.

      Linus, you're officially more famous than the Chinese government.

    4. Re:More importantly... by nossid · · Score: 0

      Way to get a +5 Funny and yet you messed it up a bit.

      "Well, if you boys aren't drinking real beer, then neither will I."

    5. Re:More importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke makes perfect sense the way he told it, it's obviously implied that he means "drinking alcohol"...

    6. Re:More importantly... by justins · · Score: 2, Informative
      Way to get a +5 Funny and yet you messed it up a bit.

      "Well, if you boys aren't drinking real beer, then neither will I."

      It's a lot funnier the way he told it.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    7. Re:More importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a lame ass. Your delivery sucks ass. The joke is totally ruined if the punch line is too explicit and mentions the obvious.

      Dipshit.

    8. Re:More importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke is totally ruined if the punch line is too explicit and mentions the obvious.

      You must not be from the USA... ... or you might just be suffering from acute good taste.

  63. MOD PARENT UP by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    You're right. Mac OS X is a perfect example of the merging of the two worlds: Apple and GNU. Mac OS X is a significant thing for GNU software because the basis of the OS is Unix, just like Linux. Ergo, GNU software can be easily ported to Mac OS X and vice versa. Which means that programs like OpenOffice.org and Evolution now have another OS that they will run under.

    This is a Good Thing.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mac OS X is a significant thing for GNU software because the basis of the OS is Unix, just like Linux.

      Linux is NOT Unix. Do you even know what GNU stands for?

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Since when has OpenOffice.org been a GNU project? I thought they were started by Sun?

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      I dont think "started" is the right word. They purchased StarOffice from a German company.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by moncyb · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. Looking at their site, StarOffice was created by a company(?) called StarDivision. It appears you are correct. I can't tell, but is OpenOffice a fork of StarOffice or what?

  64. Dead last, of course. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    He's always at the bottom of the list, ya know.

  65. Sobig is 42 by rifter · · Score: 5, Funny

    As an interesting aside, the writer of the Sobig virus even makes it in at Number 42..."

    So the answer to life the universe and everything is a Windows worm? Somehow it is all very clear to me now... :)

    1. Re:Sobig is 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately placing a Virus Writer on any kind of list especially ones like this probably will make up and coming Virus Writers out there write even more of those in order to make it on to those lists.

      It's just like handing out bragging rights to those (No appropriate word in my dictionary but you know what i mean)

      Am I the only one who finds this worrying?

    2. Re:Sobig is 42 by Toutatis · · Score: 1

      Where is the question then?

      It's in its code or sobig will mutate and evolve until it's ready to give that question.

    3. Re:Sobig is 42 by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      So the answer to life the universe and everything is a Windows worm? Somehow it is all very clear to me now... :)

      Eh? Clear? How? The *answer* is well-known to be 42. It's the *question* that seems to align with the SoBig virus author. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Sobig is 42 by horo_prc · · Score: 1

      All the kidding aside. Why did the sobig author made it to the list and not the man who stopped it? Risto Siilasmaa, the CEO of F-Secure, deserves the place instead of the nameles scriptkiddie. Or what do I know, Im just a geek and theyre Hot Shot journalist, or whatever.

    5. Re:Sobig is 42 by Hangman+Jim+99 · · Score: 1

      The Answer is "42".
      The question is "Who do you want to infect today?"

      --
      --- I hate my sig
    6. Re:Sobig is 42 by HiThere · · Score: 1

      But if they tell you are, then you can stop them. But the question is, "How much of the \"credit\" does this guy really deserve?"

      From what I overheard by accident, it sounded like he was just changing some text strings in a virus that was already live. Sort of like a viral marketing flack. I must admit though, I didn't pay much attention, and that's not the way the new feeds reported it.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  66. Re:Negate? No. by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on! Steve Jobs has him beat by a long shot - he hasn't coded anything since he worked for Atari!

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  67. Lara who? by pixelgeek · · Score: 1
    If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls.

    Why do writers feel compelled to resort to ludicrous generalisations like this? Is it because they are rather poor writers and can't come up with anything more novel (or true) or does it make their target audience feel smuggly superior to the technical people that run their IT departments and office networks?

    Yet another example of piss-poor writing that seems to typify most publications these days. People more concerned with meeting a word count and hitting a deadline than actual quality content.

  68. It's Not A Poster, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although it is not a poster, I do have a few pictures on the wall.

    A photo of a young Linus in a white sweater sits below a photo of RMS, between my 'Einstein on NBC radio' and Cultivate Understanding posters. Beneath them are "The Researcher's Dilemma" poster and an "Ignore Alien Orders" sticker. ;-) ...and you call yourslves Geeks ?

  69. not a nice picture by nizram · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs (1) who comes out on top of Bill Gates (2)

    Not a nice picture created in my mind by that sentence...

    Gotta stay off that net pr0n :-)

  70. Mom made him stop. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    My brother was burning incense, but my mom made him stop.

  71. Dead links by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in any of the non-Torvalds agenda setters on the list, yes there are indeed many dead links. Carly Fiorina and a few others lead nowhere.

    Who besides me noticed?

  72. Geeks or Dykes? by Sebastopol · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but I see more posters of Xena in lesbian households than in nerd cubes.

    Personally, I had posters of Samantha Fox and Apollonia Kotero on my walls when I was a teen, but I bet none of you know who they were. ;-)

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Geeks or Dykes? by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Funny
      Samantha Fox

      isn't she Briney Spears mother or something?

    2. Re:Geeks or Dykes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Dyke's third and the first geek's fifth but there's a geek-turned-businessman on the second place. Anyhow, there are definitely more geeks than dykes on the list.

    3. Re:Geeks or Dykes? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Personally, I had posters of Samantha Fox and Apollonia Kotero on my walls when I was a teen, but I bet none of you know who they were. ;-)

      Samantha Fox was *hot*, dude. I remember her being really sweet, so we concluded she was probably bitchy as hell when there wasn't a camera pointed at her.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  73. You mean the ones who ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    put the economy in the POTTY?

    By the way, technically he is the POTUS*.
    Don't forget the asterisk. History won't.

    1. Re:You mean the ones who ... by bnenning · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      put the economy in the POTTY?


      Exactly. They developed time travel and went back to 1996, where they assumed top positions at Enron and Worldcom, deliberately inflated the stock market bubble, and convinced Clinton not to do anything about Osama.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:You mean the ones who ... by Medievalist · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      They developed time travel and went back to 1996, where they assumed top positions at Enron and Worldcom, deliberately inflated the stock market bubble, and convinced Clinton not to do anything about Osama.
      Um, hate to break this to you, but many of the people who were in "top positions at Enron and Worldcom" in the 90s are in top positions at the White House today.

      Look it up. Assuming you are one of the few Clinton-obsessed shrub apologists who can read.

      And incidentally, I seem to remember Clinton firing cruise missiles at Osama. "Conservatives" in the media and government lambasted him for it, too - even though he got just as close to knocking the pious bastard off as George Bush ever did, and spent a hell of a lot less taxpayer dollars to do it!

      Are you sure it wasn't Rush Limbaugh who invented that time machine? The right wing needs to get past this whole Clinton thing, I mean, it really makes them look like a bunch of chumps. The rest of us are ready to move on.
    3. Re:You mean the ones who ... by bnenning · · Score: 1
      And incidentally, I seem to remember Clinton firing cruise missiles at Osama.


      Yes, he did a nice job of taking out the Asprin Factory of Doom and assorted empty buildings, but his followup was rather weak (i.e. nonexistent) considering he utterly failed to achieve his goal (assuming his goal was in fact to get bin Laden and not keep Monica out of the headlines).


      even though he got just as close to knocking the pious bastard off as George Bush ever did, and spent a hell of a lot less taxpayer dollars to do it!


      Right, all Bush did was spend more money. Unless you count the destruction of the Taliban, crippling of al Qaeda, and liberation of the Afhan people, but why bother with details? Oh, and Osama is very probably in many thousands of pieces at Tora Bora


      The right wing needs to get past this whole Clinton thing, I mean, it really makes them look like a bunch of chumps. The rest of us are ready to move on.


      That's just funny, considering this sub-thread started with yet another whine about the 2000 election.


      Sorry to burst your little persecution complex, but I don't give a rat's ass about Clinton. I pointed out the three major causes of the recession (which we're recovering from nicely; I know how that must disappoint you), and exactly zero of them are due to Bush's actions in office.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    4. Re:You mean the ones who ... by Medievalist · · Score: 1
      Right, all Bush did was spend more money. Unless you count the destruction of the Taliban, crippling of al Qaeda, and liberation of the Afhan people, but why bother with details?
      Oy veh.

      The Taliban still exists.

      Al Quaeda is still active.

      The Afghan people would rather not be "liberated" into the arms of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and the Northern Alliance of despotic criminals.
      Oh, and Osama is very probably in many thousands of pieces at Tora Bora
      That would be nice. Don't bet the farm on it.
      That's just funny, considering this sub-thread started with yet another whine about the 2000 election.
      Well, Taco says if you can't be insightful be amusing. And I too am tired of the whining about the 2000 election; the shrub stole it fair and square as far as I'm concerned. Besides, the Gorebot couldn't have beaten Bozo the Clown with his campaign strategies.
      Sorry to burst your little persecution complex, but I don't give a rat's ass about Clinton. I pointed out the three major causes of the recession (which we're recovering from nicely; I know how that must disappoint you), and exactly zero of them are due to Bush's actions in office.
      Three causes - Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.

      I don't feel persecuted and disappointed, but I guess I can take your word on it. Oh well, at least I have a job, which is tough in the shrub economy. Talk to any of those Timken Bearing employees lately?

      I am also very amused by the way we've been "recovering nicely" from this "recession" ever since Bush got in office. I read about it every day in the "liberal" media!

      You guys bag me up....
    5. Re:You mean the ones who ... by bnenning · · Score: 1
      Besides, the Gorebot couldn't have beaten Bozo the Clown with his campaign strategies.


      Hooray, we can agree on something. With that, I'll be done.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  74. I wonder why by sdack · · Score: 1

    Why should I with my decision to use Linux make Linus Torwalds to one of the most influential persons on this planet?

    Is it because he could turn Linux into something I would not want to use? Or into something that would not let me use my computer anymore or only on a very high cost?

    Or is it because he is hard to convince of the necessity of a particular patch and appears to be the most annoyed person on the kernel mailing list?

    Sven

  75. Xena? Lara Croft? Linus Torvalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a poster of Michelangelo from the Ninja Turtles on my wall.

  76. Jobs on top of gates by smellystudent · · Score: 2, Funny
    Steve Jobs (1) who comes out on top of Bill Gates (2)
    Great, that's just the mental image I wanted before dinner. Thank you very much.
    --
    Predictive text is shiv!
    1. Re:Jobs on top of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

  77. What about David Crane? by stm2 · · Score: 1

    David Crane is the author of Pitfall and many 8-bits clasic games. Lot of todays programmers are in this field because they were atracted by classic games.

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  78. Best work was in the past!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well yeah, the best stuff I've done has been in the past, all of it in fact...

    The point about Linus' work is that it is continual, focussed and an uphill struggle. Surely - with that in mind - the best is yet to come? I'd certainly hope so.

  79. Journalistic fluff by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not flattering? The main problem with this bio is that it is poorly written fluff by some hack with a lot of space to fill. There's substantially better journalism in People. Ignore this junk.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Journalistic fluff by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      I agree -- half of the write-up on Jobs was about how he ranked previously... It appears as if they were struggling to write the material.

  80. Serious problem here.... by Maudib · · Score: 1

    Isnt it distressing that there are only two women on this list? And that the highest ranked of the two isnt a developer/researcher but a corporate exec through and through?

    Im not saying that they should be artificially promotoed in order to give fair treatment, but it seems that we are sort of only using half the resources availble to us, and that the female perspective could radically change(improve?) technical innovation if it were taken advantage of.

    I know that industries like finance get a bad rap frequently for being centered around a "boys club" mentality. But I bet a survey of finance's top fifty would do better then 4% women.

    1. Re:Serious problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnt it distressing that there are only two women on this list?

      Well, maybe not enough of them have slept their way to the top? Should we be upset at this, or applud the fact that these two were able to whore their way onto the list?

    2. Re:Serious problem here.... by moncyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Boy's club mentality"??? Maybe there are few women on the list because few women choose to enter technical fields. In all my electronics and computer science classes, there were a very small percentage of women, and there was no "boy's club mentality" either. In fact, most of the guys would go out of their way to help the women.

    3. Re:Serious problem here.... by spinlocked · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to have a girlfriend who worked in IT (around the time of the HP-compaq deal) who acknowleged that Fiorina was the role model for women in IT, and that she wished that she wasn't - because Carly was making them all look bad.

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    4. Re:Serious problem here.... by Maudib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it that technical fields are intimidating to women? There is no biological reason for them to be inherently adverse to such work. So the root of the problem must be social.

      The same argument "women dont want to enter the field" was used for most fields that were predominatly men, until that is women no longer felt there was a social barrier.

    5. Re:Serious problem here.... by amplt1337 · · Score: 1
      In fact, most of the guys would go out of their way to help the women.

      You sure that wasn't just a misguided attempt to show off their technical prowess as a rudimentary mating ritual?

      Seriously though. Most of the guys in my CS classes usually just managed to make themselves look like idiots anyways, since the women were the ones who really knew what was going on by comparison & nobody appreciates people who assume them to be ignorant or in need of help...

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    6. Re:Serious problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where is Meg Whitman (Ebay) ?

    7. Re:Serious problem here.... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Why is it that technical fields are intimidating to women? There is no biological reason for them to be inherently adverse to such work. So the root of the problem must be social.

      Because from birth to death women are told they are too stupid to understand technology. When a woman lifts up the hood on her car, 5 men show up to (look at her tits) tell her they'll take care of her. There are few women in IT because computers require math, logic, and problem solving skills to administer, program, and, and, well, whatever else it is we do with them! Women are discouraged in schools to pursue math, and logic and problem solving skills are disdained by all (remember all the pricks complaining about "word problems" in algebra classes?). Social conditioning is the #1 reason women are still being kept out of highly technical fields (despite the fact that women scientists regularly contribute to the vast depth of human knowledge).

      How do we solve this problem? Well, I think the problem is being solved over time. With each new generation, women seem to be more free-thinking and individual than they were before. It could just be my imagination.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:Serious problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because from birth to death women are told they are too stupid to understand technology. When a woman lifts up the hood on her car, 5 men show up to (look at her tits) tell her they'll take care of her. There are few women in IT because computers require math, logic, and problem solving skills to administer, program, and, and, well, whatever else it is we do with them! Women are discouraged in schools to pursue math, and logic and problem solving skills are disdained by all (remember all the pricks complaining about "word problems" in algebra classes?). Social conditioning is the #1 reason women are still being kept out of highly technical fields (despite the fact that women scientists regularly contribute to the vast depth of human knowledge). How do we solve this problem? Well, I think the problem is being solved over time. With each new generation, women seem to be more free-thinking and individual than they were before. It could just be my imagination.

      Good work asserting things. The moon is made of green cheese. Yay, I can do it too.

    9. Re:Serious problem here.... by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Where is Richard Stallman (GNU/FSF)?

    10. Re:Serious problem here.... by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Congradulations, you found the know it all wannabes! They look for people they think can be easily impressed and try to show off their "knowledge." When they were kids, their parents would reward them for their accomplishments. "You scribbled on a peice of paper? Yay! Have a cookie!" "You tied your shoes? Yay! Have a cookie!" "You wet your bed? Yay! Have a cookie!"

      I doubt most of these guys you talk about wanted to date you. Unless you patronized them, then they'd say: "she's just like mommy. I wuv my mommy. I wuv her now tuo." Once you patronize them, you never hear the end of it. "Look mommy, I made a brown stain in my pants!" Just hope your instructor isn't one of these people. Solve a problem better than they can, instant F.

      The women I was talking about did need help. One was a waitress from a small town and started the class in the middle of the semester. About half the class worked together to help her get caught up. There was no "Look at me, mommy! You are cute. will you go out on a date?" crap. They left the women who knew what they were doing alone. Except for the really gifted one--I'm afraid when you're too good, some people will bug you for the answers, male or female.

    11. Re:Serious problem here.... by moncyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is it that technical fields are intimidating to women?

      Technical fields are intimidating to just about everyone, except the truly gifted, and there are about as many gifted women in IT as there are gifted men.

      So the root of the problem must be social.

      The root of the problem is social.

      Extremists gather in groups to tell women there is a vast conspiracy to keep women away from computers. Then when a woman encounters a troll who attacks anyone and will use anything they can think of as an insult, she thinks: "they are right. Everyone is out to get me. I give up." The problem when you train people to play a victime, they become one and don't even try. No matter who a person is, no matter where a person goes, no matter what they do, there are people who will shit on them. One has to learn to deal with these wackos, not cave in.

      Then their is the fact that most men are stripped of their emotions. From childhood, they are taught they shouldn't have any. No wonder most of them become obsessed with machines. Women tend to be more normal. "most of those females I know who program and use *NIX as much as I do don't obsessively do so. On the contrary, most men I know who program and use *NIX do so all night long, sustaining themselves on Jolt and Oreos."

      The same argument "women dont want to enter the field" was used for most fields that were predominatly men,

      Well, if all these women want to enter the field so much, why don't I see many women's names in open source projects? All they need is a computer, some books, and a webpage. No "boys club" conspiracy can stop them from doing it. Do you think SourceForge and Freshmeat delete projects because they are run by women?

    12. Re:Serious problem here.... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There is also a large class of women who don't want to work. They leech homework from gullible guys, and cry to the instructor to get their grades boosted.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    13. Re:Serious problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just thought I'd point out the obvious...
      The reason "most of the guys would go out of their way to help the women" was more to do with the fact 99% of all geeks are so desperate to get laid.
      Or that's how it was in my electronics and computer classes (at uni)

    14. Re:Serious problem here.... by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure. The gay ones living in their parent's basement. The ones who are big fat sweaty geeks and never shower. The ones who want to spray grits all over Natalie Portman's petrified ass in Soviet Russia.

    15. Re:Serious problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a failure of the listmakers, not the women. Adele Goldberg isn't on there, while Scott McNealy - who also "isnt a developer/researcher but a corporate exec through and through" - is.

  81. Who *should've* made it.... by gregarican · · Score: 1

    the "dude, you're getting a Dell" guy. He has certainly helped bridge the generation gap between the PC populus. Too bad he can't accept the award because he's in the clink after trying to score another sack...

  82. Re:Negate? No. by Webmonger · · Score: 1

    "Work" doesn't mean "coding" either. Torvald's current work is in coding and "herding cats".

  83. Gates' best work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > In truth Torvalds best work is in the past...

    And Gates' best work is...oh nevermind.

  84. Strange Headline by donutello · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd expect the headline to say "Steve Jobs Most Powerful Man in Tech" rather than focus on Linus being 5th most powerful.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  85. Greg Dyke by Yanray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love the fact that Good old Rupert was knocked down to size by a pioneer in e-izing independent media, Greg Dyke. I have loved the BBC's style of reporting since living in Birmingham for a year. Since then Greg Dyke has moved the BBC to be one of the best news/tv sites on the net. Regardless of what you think of the BBC itself he has paved the way that other media giants are going to intigrate thier services onto the Net.

    For the worlds worst example see FOX News.

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
    1. Re:Greg Dyke by fuqqer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Fucking AC eurotrash weasel. I bet you've never heard of Bob Edwards, a famous US commentator on NPR news, and nobody here cares. The fact that you care enough to post about the fact that I didn't know some punk your no good, tea swilling, country that couldn't hold it's colonies, is evidence that you're an ass. You sir are a spineless poofter.

      Are you trying to tell me that you knew everyone on the list? Yeah right, you stuck up chump. I'd be willing to bet you didn't even know 7 of the top ten.

      Anonymous Cowards like you, who berate someone for not knowing something that you may think is trivial violates the spirit of learning and just makes a lot more noise on /. Kinda like this post you AC prick.

      Mod me down for having the guts to post as myself unlike the wasted load of sarcastic semen who this post responds to. I can't believe the parent was modded up as informative. The original aricle has links to who the guys are anyway.

      -non sig- ...

    2. Re:Greg Dyke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I bet you've never heard of Bob Edwards

      You mean this Bob Edwards.

      Besides, I didn't say that Greg Dyke was a famous UK commentator. I said that he "heads up" the BBC. He is the director general (DG). In charge. The bloke who makes decisions.

      Fucking AC eurotrash weasel
      you're an ass
      you stuck up chump
      you AC prick

      Looks like someone forgot to take their happy pills today!

  86. Someone is missing..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the Cowboy ???!!! Neal wtf happened, how are you not here? Its a conspiracy I say....

  87. In the past? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In a world where you aren't judged not by what you have done, but what you have done lately... I have to say that this journalist is one of the few tech journalists out there that doesn't know what the fsck he is talking about.

    I say that rarely these days because most tech journalists, nowadays, know what they are talking about and are quite savvy.

    Not only because Linus is doing some real good stuff these days, managing the kernel itself, but because if he wasn't doing anything good currently, why would he be voted higher than last year?

    This person not only doesn't know tech, they have no common sense.

    I have to give this journalist the Anonymous Coward Weanie Journalist of the Week award.

    l8,
    AC

  88. Jobs? At this late date? by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Despite all the hype, Apple has less market share than it did when Gil Amelio left. Jobs' contribution was caving in to Microsoft and cost-cutting, not innovation.

    The most innovative hardware technology in computing today is coming from Sony. Everybody else has architectures from the past; Sony is actually selling new ones, in volume.

    Incidentally, Motorola is about to bail out of the semiconductor business. They're trying to sell off their semiconductor operation. Sad.

    1. Re:Jobs? At this late date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Under Steve Jobs, Apple has:
      -Introduced the whole "Legacy Free" concept
      -Introduced a modern UNIX-based OS
      -Introduced 64-bit systems at prices competitive with the best 32-bit systems
      -Released some of the most visually attention-getting industrial designs in the industry.

      Is he an "Adgenda Setter?" I don't know. But he has allowed Apple to take significant steps.

    2. Re:Jobs? At this late date? by r_benchley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regardless of whether most people would shell out the money for the systems, I think that most Slashdotters would agree that Apple's hardware is very, very nice. 1gHz bus, serial ATA, FireWire 800, etc. The hardware rocks. This poll is meant to measure influence, not power or market share. Apple innovates, everyone else follows. Incidentally, Motorola can go fuck themselves. They sat on their asses for years, contributing nothing to the improvement of CPUs. Fortunately, IBM has picked up the slack in a big way.

    3. Re:Jobs? At this late date? by Animats · · Score: 1
      Introduced the whole "Legacy Free" concept

      Actually, no. The roadmap for "legacy-free PCs" appeared in the PC 97 spec from Intel and Microsoft, and "legacy-free PCs" have been on the market since 1999.

      Introduced 64-bit systems at prices competitive with the best 32-bit systems

      Sun workstations have been 64 bits since the mid 1990s. The entry-level Sun Blade is only $1395, while the entry-level PowerMac G5 is $1999. Sun is probably still outselling Apple in 64 bit machines.

      Itanium desktops flopped, but for a while, you could buy them. (Dell dropped theirs last year.) Those shipped years before Apple's 64 bit machines.

    4. Re:Jobs? At this late date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "legacy-free PCs" have been on the market since 1999.

      What took them so long?

    5. Re:Jobs? At this late date? by mlilback · · Score: 1

      How much marketshare Apple has it irrelevant. The question was who is an agenda setter?

      Jobs brought us firewire, no-floppy computers, usb (never would have taken off without the iMac), iMovie, iPhoto, iPod, iTunes music store, largest vendor of Unix computers, the Aqua look and feel. And don't forget the advertising which has caused a lot of people to talk about Apple over the last 5 years.

      All of these are things that other companies have since adopted or tried to copy. What has any one person at Sony done that compares to that list (and is copied by others in the industry)?

      We're not looking for innovation or power, but setting the agenda. Jobs certainly does that.

  89. and for some damn reason... by brennanw · · Score: 1

    they don't mention my name once. I mean, REALLY. Sooner or later I will force those fools to recognize my contributions. Ohhhhh, yesss, they laugh now, but someday... SOMEDAY...

    muah. a. hah. ah.

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
  90. Re:Yeesh! Get a life you geeks! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    Who's more pathetic, the fanboy geeks, or the loser trolls who spend time on slashdot making fun of them?

    (Or the fanboy geeks making fun of the loser trolls making fun of the fanboy geeks?)

  91. ah, have to love bad moderation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ah, offtopic...lovely to see a post about a computer company executive and agendas get marked offtopic on an article about computer leadership agendas...

  92. But I *Do* Have a Pic of Linus on My Wall by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    Gates too. The Jan/Feb '99 cover of MIT's Technology Review with Torvalds and Gates face to face has been on my wall for years now. There is a devil mustache and horns on Bill, of course.

    1. Re:But I *Do* Have a Pic of Linus on My Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a URL for that pic?

    2. Re:But I *Do* Have a Pic of Linus on My Wall by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      There is a devil mustache and horns on Bill, of course.

      But isn't Bill the bad guy? /me doesn't understand.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:But I *Do* Have a Pic of Linus on My Wall by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      /me wonders if you like the devil

    4. Re:But I *Do* Have a Pic of Linus on My Wall by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      sorry - hardcopy only

    5. Re:But I *Do* Have a Pic of Linus on My Wall by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      WOOOOOOOOOOOOO SATAN!!!!!!!

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  93. Murdoch? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Strange. I just thought he was just a TV exec. For those not familiar he is the head of Newscorp, parent company of Fox and Sky.

    I was also interested as to why Sobig made it and Blaster/Lovsan did not. Blaster forced people off the net because their systems were constantly rebooting. Sobig was just a clever e-mail that has been used before.

    1. Re:Murdoch? by moncyb · · Score: 1

      He's influential because News Corp is the main company pushing DRM. If the DRM cartel succeeds, they'll have total control over all computer technology.

      Want to create some hardware? You will have to get your drivers signed by the cartel (while paying them some huge fee no doubt). If they don't like your device, it won't get it's drivers signed, and therefore won't work on most computers as they will mostly be DRM machines. Want to write some software? Same deal.

      Want to publish some sort of digital work (movie, music, web page, etc)? Well, maybe they won't require the work be signed directly by them, but to "combat piracy", you'll have to get a digial certificate from them and sign your works with it. If they don't like your work--maybe it's critical of the MPAA, then they will revoke your certificate, and no one can view your works anymore.

  94. Wha!?? Xena posters? by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

    I don't know a single geek with Xena posters. Most geeks have Star Trek or X-Files posters, at least that is what I have in my office.

  95. No. 39 Sir John Sulston? by dave+cutler · · Score: 1

    John Sulston won a well deserved Nobel prize in medicine for his work with Sydney Brenner on cell lineage fate in C. Elegans. He is also one of the few men for whom it can be rightly argued that the human genome project would not have happened, but for his contributions. There may be another Nobel coming his way for this too. However, Sulston's influence on Bioinformatics/Software/IT is FAR, FAR, FAR less obvious. Suggesting that he might be one of the 50 most influential people in the world in IT is a terribly difficult argument to make. It's not entirely clear he is among the ten most influential IT people at the Sanger, never mind in the world. Let's give credit where credit is due. Sulston is one of the great biologists/scientists/geneticist of his time. IT is but a small component of this man's work, and not one where his enormous powers have been most evident.

  96. Obligatory H2G2 Reference by arunarunarun · · Score: 1

    As an interesting aside, the writer of the Sobig virus even makes it in at Number 42...

    SoBig virus - ranked Number 42...
    Number 42 - The answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything.

    Coincidence? Maybe...
    And those aliens were just a figment of your imagination too.
    No really...they were.
    {Twitch}

  97. Video gaming? by NetDanzr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed that one group of people was not represented among the top 50 at all - people connected to video gaming. Don't tell me that companies like Sony are less important for the future of technology as virus writers or even 15-minutes of fame people like Dimitri Sklarov.

  98. Atal Vajpayee by cygnusx · · Score: 1

    ...is number 8 because he's prime minister of India? How did he even contribute to making India a software destination worth considering??

    1. Re:Atal Vajpayee by Detritus · · Score: 1

      He hasn't nuked Pakistan, yet.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Atal Vajpayee by cygnusx · · Score: 1

      LOL. I RTFA and it says India became a software outsourcing destination because of *his* policies. Heh. He had nothing to do with it. All the hard work was done by a few entrepreneurs, and Manmohan Singh's "liberalization" policies provided the fillip.

      Ah well, I guess one could say the best thing Vajpayee has done for India and software is that he's kept the government out of the software biz's hair (unlike every other Indian industry that's so wound up in .gov red tape that setting up an industry in India is generally considered to be about as pleasant as a trip to hell and back).

  99. Lara Croft?! by the_laotse · · Score: 1

    How many techies do in fact have a poster of Lara on their walls? I am yet to see/meet one..

  100. In flagranti? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also in the Top 5 is Steve Jobs (1) who comes out on top of Bill Gates (2).
    Well, if there ever was a good place to come out, it's got to be on top of Bill Gates.

  101. Linus'best work.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must have a very powerful crystal ball to be able to state categorically that he won't do something better in the future.

    Seriously, I suspect they mean "most influential", not "best". After all, the pre-1.0 linux was probably the most influential stage of linux in terms of gathering a big bazaar of programmers to work on it; since then, in a way, it has just been evolving. But is it best? Well, I'm not planning to rush out to trade in my 2.4.20-gaming-r3 for 0.9.x...

  102. So what? by dacap · · Score: 1

    So the big T. made the list. So RMS didn't. So Gates and Jobs rank well too. So what? This is just a journalist's opinion of who is influential anyway. Ordering is based on those he knows and how visible they are. The world has LOTS of opinions - at least as many as there are people.

    --
    English -- gotta love it! / The engineers refuse to refuse the rocket until the refuse is removed from the launch pad.
  103. Re:Negate? No. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I've got news for you, he didn't do much coding at Atari, either!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  104. Merchandise... by hustin · · Score: 1

    "...techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their walls."

    Is this something we should expect to see at ThinkGeek in the near future? Or perhaps a deck of cards with faces of the Techno-Famous on them?

    -h

    --

    "my other flamethrower is a Spaceballs flamethrower"

  105. After the /.ing by craw · · Score: 2, Funny

    of the silicon.com web site, CmdrTaco has been added to the list.

    Unfortunately, this leads to the revised list being posted on /. which leads to...

  106. What do geeks put on their walls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Completely OT, but it struck me that I've never seen a Lara Croft or Xena poster displayed anywhere. Do you have such a poster? I don't have posters myself, but if I did it would be of Feynman, Torvalds or Aishwarya Rai.

  107. No Cary-Sue Sherman/Hillary Rosen? by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 1

    They included the SoBig author, so they understand "most influential" could mean negative influence. Whatever you think of the sue-em-all campaign, the RIAA has had a huge impact on the development of p2p apps, distribution of music over the internet, and probably the growth of broadband as well.

  108. Re:Negate? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > are you suggesting he's not a power either?

    No, but it might be suggesting his "best work is in the past". OTOH, if what we have seen is his best....

  109. Angle Grinder Man -- The Most Powerful Man in Tech by mr_gerbik · · Score: 1

    http://disjointed.org/archives/000248.html

    "Basically, he jumped out of his car in his outfit and said, `If anyone can, Angle-Grinder Man can,' " Ms. Tendai said in a telephone interview. "Then he just started sawing it off. It was wicked."

  110. Dear Troll, by o'reor · · Score: 1
    Would you care to point me to the place where I can find a Unix version of Visual C++ ? Since Unix is the corporate standard, if I'm in my right mind, I can surely find a Visual C++ suiting my Unix needs...

    Otherwise, you might as well fit into the category of the people "out of their right mind"...

    Oh, and kdevelop is a great tool. Don't mistake it for Visual C++.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  111. hackers on top! by dermusikman · · Score: 1

    looking at the list briefly, it's good to catch 2 or 3 hackers on it! (if you count the SoBig author) at least 2 or three names i recognize.

    it's interesting also, with the arguably condescending remarks on the Open Source movement, that while the president of China is listed the 4th most influential man in technology they fail to mention China's official RED FLAG LINUX.
    interesting, eh?

  112. Absolutely by The+Tyro · · Score: 0


    Never underestimate the value of that "regular guy" persona. Torvalds may be one of the "digeratti" (don't you just hate that expression?), but you sort of get the sense that he's a regular guy.

    No napoleon complex, no "I'm bigger than all of you" attitude, no chip on his shoulder, no larger-than-life image, or an ego that you can't fit into a conference room. What's not to like about Linus? Never met him personally, but I've never heard of him acting like any sort of ass.

    The best description I ever heard of Linus is that he's a "quiet revolutionary." I'd say that's perfectly put.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  113. Where is Stallman! by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Hu Jintao

    Here is a household name for the free software crowd. To leave Stallman out of this list is unthinkable. Stallman is to Torvalds what Marx was to Lenin.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Where is Stallman! by licketyspit · · Score: 1

      Agreed, though I think Stallman gets accused of being a communist more than marx or lenin ;-)

    2. Re:Where is Stallman! by r_benchley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I wouldn't list him in the top 50 either. Top 100, yes. He started something very cool, but his own personal influence on tech has faded. Emacs was a long time ago, and Hurd hasn't gone very far. His influence is similar to Steve Jobs, in that both are visionaries. The reason that Steve Jobs is number one on the list and RMS isn't on it is that Steve Jobs will do anything to carry out his vision. RMS is a dreamer and a thinker, not a doer. I would have listed Eric Raymond in the top 50, though.

    3. Re:Where is Stallman! by amightywind · · Score: 1
      RMS is a dreamer and a thinker, not a doer.

      It may not be the case presently, but Stallman has to be considered one of the most productive programmers of all time. You can read about his Lisp exploits in "Hackers, Heroes of the Computer Revolution" by Steven Levy. He single handedly developed GNU Emacs and GCC through the early 1990's. He was a major contributor to make, gdb, gas, gld, and numerous other programs that are essential to GNU/Linux today. Most of the packaging and naming conventions used in free software are due to him.

      I would have listed Eric Raymond in the top 50, though.

      Talk about a dreamer not a doer! Raymond would like to think he is a great hacker, but he is middling at best. Emacs VC and fetchmail are welcome contributions but nothing extraordinary. Raymond is really more of a pundit with a glib writting style that has some popularity. As helpful as he is in many respects to the free software cause, his imposition of gun politics in his writtings makes him less persuasive.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
  114. But what about..? by Laconian · · Score: 1

    They should do a study as to who the most influential religious figures are. Torvalds would get #2, just behind LRH.

  115. Darl McBride made the list -- sorta by benploni · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From Silicon.com's Agenda Setters 2003:
    http://www.silicon.com/as2003/analysis2.htm l
    ===============
    Someone who could well have fallen into this category this year but
    didn't make the list at all is SCO CEO Darl McBride. He has led his
    company's charge to get credit for what it claims is some of its code
    turning up in Linux. So far the row has taken the form of a lawsuit
    brought against IBM, headlines in the media and SCO invoicing some
    users for Linux roll outs.

    However, when asked what happened when his company was served with a
    request to pay a SCO licence for Linux, panellist Ric Francis,
    Safeway's CIO, said: "I told them to stick it. At the end of the day it
    is never going to fly. It's the last dying breath of a company that is
    never going to make money."

    McBride - in the headlines yes, agenda setting no. There is a
    difference.
    ===============

  116. Lara Croft, Xena??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow the idea of Linux with watermelon boobs and wearing leather tights is rather frightening to me.

  117. the rules should be changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    changed to _what_?

  118. Bah to flashing ads by pen · · Score: 1

    I tried to read the article but just couldn't due to the obnoxious flashing skyscraper ad for... the same article I was trying to read.

    1. Re:Bah to flashing ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they run out of impressions from other advertisers and drop to their own carousel of ads.

  119. Where is Larry Wall? by nickyj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am surprised not to see the PERL GOD, Larry Wall up on that list. He might not be powerful, but he is influential.

    --
    Causing Chaos Everywhere,
    Nik J.
    The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    1. Re:Where is Larry Wall? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I am surprised not to see the PERL GOD, Larry Wall up on that list. He might not be powerful, but he is influential.

      Yeah, he's single-handedly responsible for the rise of the python.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Where is Larry Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he can use his influence to finish Perl 6 sometime before 2006.

  120. What about esther? by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Where the hell is Esther Dyson? She is a top member of EFF, used to be the chairman of Icann and now sits on like the boards of 10 companies, as well as a being a trade show organizer and a VP capitalist, and to top it all off her dad is Freeman Dyson one of the pioneers that helped quantify Quantum Electro-Dynamics.

  121. Here we go again... by slobber · · Score: 1

    frolicking in the reality distortion field...

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
  122. A guinness man? by The+Tyro · · Score: 0


    Heck, that alone should have bumped him up at least a slot or two.

    If any one of those guys admitted to drinking swill (like anything that comes in a 40oz bottle, or any wine that has a screw-on cap).... that should automatically drop them out of the top ten. Taste has to count for something.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:A guinness man? by cens0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      guiness is hardly the end all of beers. I can think of quite a few stouts, porters, and pub ale's I'd rather drink before I'd have a guiness. My favorite of course being Young's double chocolate stout. Guiness just has a distinction of being readily available worldwide.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:A guinness man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever had a proper pint of Guiness, not in
      an "Irish Bar" but a pub. Don't know where you're from, but if you're ever in Dublin go to the Gravediggers(actually Kavanaghs) in Glasnevin, it's right next to the gates of Glasnevin cemetary. That's your best pint ever right there, mothing fancy, just creamy pints and a white head all the way to the bottom of the glass. If you don't know you way around a taxi driver will drop you there or some of those literature tours end up there (Joyce etc..)

    3. Re:A guinness man? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      My favorite of course being Young's double chocolate stout.

      what a strange coincidence! i don't know how popular Young's is, but i happened to see it in a little Finnish town on my way into Russia and bought it on an impulse.

      what a terrific beer, rich and creamy with only a hint of chocolate. i don't know what other countries carries this, but i recommend it to anyone that can appreciate a good stout.

    4. Re:A guinness man? by Soulfader · · Score: 1

      Young's is quite good. Another slightly chocolatey stout is the Sheaf Stout, which is Australian, I think. I also recommend Sam Smith's Oatmeal Stout, if you can find it.

    5. Re:A guinness man? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      That's the problem... I'm not in Dublin, and don't have any trips to Ireland planned. My guiness comes out of a tap in a seattle pub if I'm lucky, a can or bottle if I'm not. And if I remember correctly, the guiness in the US isn't even brewed the same as the irish version.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    6. Re:A guinness man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Here in America, someone harping about "their" beer being Guinness is synonymous with "I don't drink alcoholic beverages, but I want to sound like I do because I'm hip."

    7. Re:A guinness man? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      "And if I remember correctly, the guiness in the US isn't even brewed the same as the irish version."

      It probably is. Guinness have spent a whole lot on establishing a global brand, and on standardising the drink. There'll be subtle differences from one brewery to another, but they'll all use yeast from the same original strain, and they'll all use the same process. The canned and bottled stuff isn't that bad either; again, they've spent a hell of a lot on R&D over the years. Indeed, the canned stuff can be better than the stuff on tap - what's in the can is never far off what Guinness intended, whereas what's on tap is at the mercy of the pub cellar and the landlord.

      Incidentally, if you ever are in Ireland don't bother with the Guinness brewery in Dublin. The bar there is a soulless corporate pit, and there's certainly no shortage of excellent pubs in Dublin. The best pint of Guinness I ever had was at Matt Molloy's bar in Westport, Co Mayo. Fabulous pub, too; there was an old bloke in the corner singing verses of 'Galway Bay' that had surely never been printed in any book of Irish songs ever compiled ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:A guinness man? by Exantrius · · Score: 1

      Except where I live... Freaking bastards. there is *NO* guinness in Santa Maria, California, except one place-- Who sells so little of it, it tastes stale and awful...

      Read my write-up of finding guinness in my new hometown here.

    9. Re:A guinness man? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      Actually, Guinness brewed in Ireland and the UK is slightly less alcoholic than its North American cousin. Both Eire and the Queen tax beer on its alcohol content and brewing it a bit weaker helps to hold down the price. In America we just tax the hell out of it regardless, so we get a stronger beer.

      I've heard that the Jamaican Guinness is stronger yet, but I don't know if that's true. At any rate, I prefer Bell's Expedition Stout, when I can get my grubby mitts on it. That's rarer now that everyone I know in Ann Arbor has moved to DC.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    10. Re:A guinness man? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      That's a total myth.

      The Guinness in Ireland is just like any other.

    11. Re:A guinness man? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      That may be true. I just know that most imported beers of the popularity level of guinness are different in the states. For instance foster's sold in the united states is actually brewed in canada.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    12. Re:A guinness man? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Except where I live... Freaking bastards. there is *NO* guinness in Santa Maria, California, except one place-- Who sells so little of it, it tastes stale and awful...

      I find it tastes that way everywhere. For a real beer, I prefer Red Oak which is brewed locally at their brewery/pub. Getting a fresh one isn't an issue. In kegs only, since it isn't pasturized. I would imagine most decent sized cities have their own breweries as well.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    13. Re:A guinness man? by Exantrius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we do have a santa maria brewery...
      They make what appears to be Budweiser, but non-pasteurized (I have no freaking clue how they managed that)...

      I love dark beers, and while guinness isn't the best of them (mmmmm... Blackwatch...), It was the best I was hoping for around here... *sigh*

      That is all, I'm going back to work...

    14. Re:A guinness man? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Alcohol wise, it may be slightly different.

      It's just there's a belief by some that Guinness in Ireland is a real, live beer, when it is keg like the rest of the world.

    15. Re:A guinness man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it's because they like Guinness you jerkoff.

  123. This list is bogus by geekee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The CEOs of Intel and AMD aren't even on the list. I'd think they'd have something to do with setting the tech agenda.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  124. It's compliment by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    to say that "Linus' best work is behind him." In other words, Linux has evolved into a stable, robust operating system. It has emerged from the development stage (where his "best" work was done) to a level of stability and usability that Bill can only dream of.

    To put it another way, "we've done what Microsoft has said they're going to do if you'll only hang on for the next release."

  125. Can't be a good List... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    My name isn't on it!

    I mean come on now! I know I'm a hot stick with a keyboard!

    Or does it mean that we're all tied for 51st place?

    (a legend in my own mind)

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  126. no Richard Stallman? by licketyspit · · Score: 1

    Whether you like him or not, it seems like he should have made it in at least the top 50. I mean sheesh if the soBig guy gets in there, why not RMS?

  127. Gates is overrated by gilesjuk · · Score: 0

    He has lots of money and people listen to him, however I don't feel that anything that exciting ever comes out of his mouth.

  128. In the past by peacefinder · · Score: 1

    I think it's also safe to say that Bill Gates' best work is in the past. How could he possibly top the coup of licensing MS-DOS to IBM? (Short of total world domination, anyway.)

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  129. Also worth noting by Tisephone · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No 15. Fred von Lohmann senior staff attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation

    Last year's position : Not Placed

    Some would say millions of consumers, in bedrooms and offices the world over, are doing a good job of dictating terms to the suits in music and film subsidiaries of the major entertainment conglomerates. But when the RIAA goes after a 12-year-old girl or confused pensioner, who are they going to call? Of course the answer could well be leading IP lawyer Fred von Lohmann from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, given his track record fighting the controversial US Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Can currently be found defending Streamcast in a case brought by 28 entertainment companies.

    --
    "Neque enim lex est aequior ulla, quam necis artifices arte perire sua."
  130. Interesting Microsoft quote by BlueEar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the bio of Hu Jintao president, China (the emphasis is mine):

    The Chinese government is looking to develop its own 3G standard, while its support for the development of an open source alternative to Windows has already had Microsoft, somewhat ironically, complaining of anti-competitive practices.

    I know most people on slashdot saw that as irony, but until PHB reads it, chances are he/she will not. So I am glad that at least silicone.com wrote it. It would be better if Wall Street Journal published similar assessment, but for now, I take this as a positive sign.

    --
    A religious war is an adult version of a fight over who has the best imaginary friend
  131. offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article mentions that Linus is a Guinness drinker, and the parent post is a Guinness joke.

  132. Re:no RMS? - no zealot by bit01 · · Score: 1

    RMS is not a zealot, at least no more a zealot than the "free enterprise" nutcases who think that it is reasonable that because of broken intellectual property laws and unethical business practices M$ should continue to be paid $30,000,000,000/year for ten programs it wrote ten years ago.

    --

    It's wrong that an IP creator should not be rewarded for their work.

    It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.

  133. s/Powerful/Influential/g? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1


    One would think that power and influence are synonymous. I don't think the day is too far off in IT-land when individual power is surpassed by the notion of communal power.

    I mean, where is the Linux community itself on that list?

    With no offense to dear Linus, but Linus!=The Linux Movement. Linus=Linus. He is a member of a greater organism, the Linux community. While he may (bless his soul) have a great deal of influence over us, we, the organism, dictate our own course, and our own movements.. For example, lately, the Linux community seems to be moving more and more in the direction of replacing X11..Hardly an edict handed down from Linus, right?

    Surely we, the Linux community, should at least be ahead of Palmisano on that list. Our little community seems to have enough influence over other pieces on the chess board..enough to move them without even touching them directly---Regardless of what SCO says, it's not like the Linux community went to IBM and ordered them to modify their business plan. :) We have more of an influence on Sam Palmisano than Sam Palmisano has on us.

    Something to think about, at least.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:s/Powerful/Influential/g? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you're going to write in C instead of English, be sure to run Lint on your posts.

      I think you want "Linus==Linus".

    2. Re:s/Powerful/Influential/g? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1


      Actually, no. I *did* mean to phrase it in an assignment operator, and not as a comparator. So nyah.

      Jesus H we're a bunch of fscking geeks.. :)

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    3. Re:s/Powerful/Influential/g? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Then following that line of thought, Ben Franklin and George Washington were just members of American society.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:s/Powerful/Influential/g? by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      but the list is about individual humans, not organizations or communities. Christ, if that were the case, the libertarian party would be on the list of influencing privacy issues in the IT field.

      also, it's not just the Linux community that is wanting to replace X, it's the much greater X11 community.

      It's debateable whether Palmisano is more influential on the Linux community, or vice versa. While I won't call IBM a 'sugar daddy' for Linux, it has done more for putting Linux in places that wouldn't think of it than any other influence, hands down.

    5. Re:s/Powerful/Influential/g? by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Power is saying "Do this" and it gets done. Influence is having your ideas adopted and people do it because they want to. They can be related, but aren't exactly the same.

  134. Linus has no power by blair1q · · Score: 1

    What power does he have?

    He can't hire or fire anyone.

    He can't spend anyone's money.

    He even quit his day job to slave over his open-source avocation.

    He might break his version of the kernel by adding massive incompatibilities, but then he'd would merely marginalize himself.

    Just what actual power does he have?

  135. -1 Flamebait, what no RMS by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

    RMS is a big pusher for OSS and Free software. You all (those who are like no RMS???) keep referring to him as GNU. Yes, that is a term, it just says that its not unix. His idea are what have made him as big as he is, that and the whole BSD thing :)

    I agree, he has been a very important force in the development of free/open source software. I dont think he has influenced the technology as much as we give him credit for. People say that without him, GNU wouldnt exist, true. Free/Open Source Software has been around since the 60'S!! I dont think RMS is 60 years old (had to be about 20 at the youngest to be involved in IT at the time). The ideas he promotes so loudly have been around before him, and they would be around without him still. He (I am not sure, so correct me if I am wrong) did give us the GPL ( or influenced its writing heavily). Linux very well could have been written without GNU as oss still. On the other hand, Linus has only made it because Linux is taking vast amounts of the market (even M$ uses linux load balencing servers like akaimi.net) in the recent years. Linux is starting to snowball in a way that Linus never could have expected, nor even really intended to. BSD has its loyal fans, I have never used it, but I have no doubt that it is a very solid os and is quite capable. BSD just isnt making the waves that Linux is.

    * all references to Linux actually are for GNU/Linux.

    --
    Stop signs are only Suggestions
  136. Bush won the election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please get on with your life*.

  137. No, he was selected ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    by the SC.

    You, like W, must not read the newspapers or watch the news programs.

    1. Re:No, he was selected ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, like a garden vegetable, have no functioning brain cells.

      The SC said you can't change the rules in the middle of the process and put a stop to the endless recounts. They selected no one.

      Maybe you should start watching the news or reading a newspaper. You might learn something.

    2. Re:No, he was selected ... by Ptraci · · Score: 1

      You mean the endless recounts that were never allowed to be completed? Including one case where a riot was staged by Republicans from out of state? They would not have been endless had they been allowed to happen at all, as they should have been by state law, since the difference in the original count was statistically insignificant.

  138. Carly Fiorina #10 ?!@#?!????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP redefined the phrase "security through obscurity" You have to be f***ing joking. HP?!?!??! http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,54297,00.ht ml

    1. Re:Carly Fiorina #10 ?!@#?!????? by silverbax · · Score: 1

      It would seem that HP has successfuly re-branded themselves as an actual 'cutting-edge' technology company.

      At least in the eyes of the general public.

  139. free market by dh003i · · Score: 1

    actually, on the unhampered free market (in an anarcho-capitalist world), there would be .

  140. No wonder! by langles · · Score: 1
    No wonder this list is so skewed. Read who composed the panel that came up with it.

    Where aren't these people on their list?

    • John Carmack of Id Software
    • Craig Barrett of Intel
    • Hector Ruiz of AMD
    • Nobuyuki Idei of Sony
    • Gerard Kleisterlee of Philips
    • Bill Joy of Sun (formerly)
    • Larry Wall (perl)
    • Miguel de Icaza of Ximian
    • Marc Ewing of RedHat
    • Thomas Pabst of Tom's Hardware


    Even the Slashdot editors might qualify.
  141. Whatever happened to... by phlyingpenguin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The guy that invented the internet, Al Gore?

    1. Re:Whatever happened to... by silverbax · · Score: 2

      I thought it had been proven that he didn't say that?

    2. Re:Whatever happened to... by phlyingpenguin · · Score: 0

      What kind of politician would he be if he couldn't pay to disprove stupid statements?

  142. Let's flesh out the real issue! by novakane007 · · Score: 1

    The big question that we need confirm here, "Is Linux a Guiness man?"

    --

    WURD!!
    1. Re:Let's flesh out the real issue! by novakane007 · · Score: 1

      serves me right for not previewing first.
      "Is Linus a Guiness man?"

      --

      WURD!!
  143. Posters by saldek · · Score: 1

    So, where do we get the Linus Torvalds posters?

    Come on, you all know you want 'em.

  144. "Steve Jobs who comes out on top of Bill Gates" by vigilology · · Score: 1

    An image I could have done without :-(

  145. Yes. I've had a beed with Steve Jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 4 years ago during my first computer job. After work, I was sitting in a restraunt in Palo Alto having dinner. Steve Jobs came in with this group of people and took the large table in the corner. A couple of them slowly tricked out, and it was just Mr. Jobs and three others left. I was joking with my friends about having a beer with him. Nobody thought that it would happen, but I got up, walked over to him, and asked him if he and his friends would like to join us for a drink. He said sure. And for the next 20 minutes, I sat and chatted with him. Quite fantastic.

  146. I love it when /.'ers don't get jokes :o) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that's why he said it in the first place...oh well, we aren't all blessed with a sense of humour I suppose.

  147. Re:Angle Grinder Man -- The Most Powerful Man in T by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

    Angle Grinder Man = yes, he's great. Long live air poisoning and parking that blocks roads and endangers life.

    I hope he gets sent down for a long time.

  148. Microsoft Security Team heard from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Son, I've had bugs more influential than you ever will be."

    Coming from a Microsoft Windows security team programmer, that is an understatement!

  149. RMS is overdrawn by IIH · · Score: 1

    Linus is influential because he has given very few people cause to dislike him. He avoids taking part in political arguments, he avoids making himself anyone's enemy.

    RMS is a zealot, and for every person he brings into his way, he alienates two others. RMS's influence is limited becaue of the numbers of people that he alienates.

    In other words: "Influence is like money in the bank, the less you use it, the more you have."

    --
    Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
  150. Steven Jobs? by katorga · · Score: 1

    How on earth did Jobs get on the list? His last cutting edge moment involved NeXTstep (which failed and had minimal influence). Apple today? Again, minimal or no influence. I think Torvalds should be number 1 or 2 as his work is radically destabilizing the industry. Bill Gates should be 1 or 2 (depending on where Torvalds is ranked) based on his ongoing influence and the repurcussions of Microsoft's battle with Linux.

    1. Re:Steven Jobs? by comet69 · · Score: 1

      I think its mostly because he started the personal computer revolution.. without him, things would be different.. i won't say, "without him we'd have nothing", but he definitely sparked the idea of computers in everyone's home which has lead us to today.. not too fond of the man if ya ask me.. Torvald definitely should of been #1 because this is the year 2003 for christ sakes.. of course bill and steve impacted the industry and the world.. but damn, that shit happened years ago haha.. Linus started a movement, and its been so successful.. a movement based on his morale.. standing up for what you think is right, and actually accomplishing something for just being a hacker, is no easy task..

      --
      - Hi I'm Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux, Lih-nix..
  151. Re:Good idea - level 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange - when I saw the number 42 my brain instantly made the connection "Level 42" (80s pop band) Could they see the future? Is there some relevance to the "lessons in love" lyrics to a computer virus author? Hmmm...

    I'm not proud, I was wrong
    and the truth is hard to take
    I felt sure we had enough
    but our love went overboard
    lifeboat lies lost at sea
    I've been trying to reach your shore
    waves of doubt keep drowning me

    All the dreams that we were building
    we never fulfilled them
    could be better, should be better
    for lessons in love

    For restless eyes egos burn
    and the mold is hard to break
    now we've waded in too deep
    and love is overboard
    heavy hearts token words
    all the hopes I ever had
    fade like footprints in the sand

    etc...I mean, love could refer to a computer virus - love refers to the atomic bomb in that (in)famous 80s Underworld track - and this song talks about dreams and ego and the virus was called SoBig?

  152. Naomi Klein by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    Author and activist Naomi Klein has been working for the anti-globalisation, anti-corporate movement for some years but shot to fame with her first book, No Logo, examining the politics of big business, among other things.

    The book provided a rallying call for those disenchanted with huge brands and, although Klein has no specific beef with the world of technology as such (despite her open criticism of Microsoft), her stance against the big corporations has struck a cord with - and mobilised - previously apolitical youth which is sure to have repercussions for the industry at large.


    I almost bought this list until I came across Naomi Klein at 43rd. Let me summarize why she's on the list.

    "Naomi Klein doesn't really write about technology per se and doesn't enjoy any real currency with most segments of the population. If she does write about technology then she will suddenly become more influential then Steve Ballmer and Tim Berners-Lee as unwashed teenagers throw rocks in windows with Microsoft and Gateway products."

    Ummm, okay. As much as he's a toad, Jeremy Rifkin is far more influential in terms of criticizing aspects of technology then Klein and I wouldn't even place him on the list.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  153. Re: translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, most of the guys would go out of their way to help the women.

    Translation: All the guys were trying to sleep with the small percentage of women. I know I was.

  154. Re:Negate? No. by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates hasn't coded anything in over 10 years

    And his best work is certainly in the past - it's been downhill all the way since Altair BASIC.

    Seriously, though, when do we think Bill last wrote some code?

    It's an interesting contrast between the world's of FOSS and commercial software. Given that Linus is still involved at the code face that must make him the most powerful (and it is power and not just influence) programmer in the world.

  155. EFF's Fred von Lohmann neglected by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1
    Why doesn't the article note that Fred von Lohmann, of the EFF, has vaulted from obscurity to 15th place? He has edged out Eric Schmidt, Scott McNealy, and Sergey Brin! (Never mind Don Knuth, Jeff Bezos, and Larry Ellison.)

    Go Fred!

  156. And quickly moving to dead last... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    ...the end user of a DRM-enabled operating system.

    And that's below luddites.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  157. Fred von Lohmann at #15 by muckdog · · Score: 1

    Another notable to the /. crowd "But when the RIAA goes after a 12-year-old girl or confused pensioner, who are they going to call? Of course the answer could well be leading IP lawyer Fred von Lohmann from the Electronic Frontier Foundation"

  158. Where's Al Gore?? by bear105 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Funny how Al Gore, the inventor of the Internet isn't on this list...

  159. Little influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's no troll: Bill Gates probably has even less influence!

    "Those fruity iMacs you mention not only changed the way we "look" at computers, but also consumables as well.

    They did, for a brief time. This was years ago. The fruit revolution died even in Apple, and the fruity foremans and staplers are quickly vanishing. "I caused George Foreman grills to come out with translucent lids" is no big deal.

    "How many web sites not only outright copy the look of Apple's own site?"

    How about... hardly any? I visit many many web sites, and visit the Apple one occasionally, and am always struck by how different it looks.

    "Or products that mimic the Aqua goodness? "

    I've seen no products, and I avoid websites that use the Aqua badness: the slow-loading pale hard-to-read low-contrast buttons violate principles of good site design.

    "What about OS X?"

    What about it? It runs on Macintoshes, that's what! That is all it does. Maybe Gates will copy the hell out of it, but that has not happened yet.

    "Maybe sites like Macromedia or desktop environments like KDE"

    Products like Flash and Shockwave make the web browsing experience all the more miserable: why would anyone want to go to the source of it? As for KDE, yes Apple influences it, but it is still one small niche player influencing a much smaller one. I did, however, visit the Macromedia site as per your request and I saw how the site was degraded with unreadable black-on-dark-blue icons).

    "Big deal, right? What else has he done?"

    You didn't name much of anything of consqeuence. What has he really done? The iPod has some impact, for sure.

    "His Macintosh gave us a GUI, mouse and pointers."

    Only if you were an Apple user. Xerox gave the world the mouse and pointer. (and Microsoft, Apple, Amiga, and Atari then gave it to their users) The GUI has been around in one form or another for longer than you realize: I saw GUI's on software for Commodore PET and Atari back in the late 1970s. It is a common misconception that Jobs (or Apple) invented these.

    "His NeXT machine gave us the World Wide Web."

    That, sir, is true alternate history. Berners-Lee, Andressson, and even Al Gore had more to do with "us" getting the Web than NeXT (which was nothing at all).

    "His iMac gave us a simple network appliance."

    As did many others.(and it was too simple: being intentionally crippled which ended up making it complicated to use and expand) But at least it influenced the color of a kitchen grill!

    "His OS X now gives us a UNIX environment grandparents, moms and teenagers can use."

    Except that most grandparents, moms, and teenagers prefer to use something else. Granny CAN use OS-X, just as she can use a TRS-80. She chooses not to. Jobs is still a niche player, with great influence in his niche but not much outside of it.

    "Quite a set of lifetime achievements."

    I think there will be a replica of a translucent pink staple-remover on his tombstone: that was the extent of the influence of his innovation (at least so far).

    1. Re:Little influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did, for a brief time. This was years ago. The fruit revolution died even in Apple, and the fruity foremans and staplers are quickly vanishing. "I caused George Foreman grills to come out with translucent lids" is no big deal.

      I beg to differ. The fruit color sensation didn't last, but the transformation of the computer from a simple beige box to a fashion statement has not. Dell's computers are sleek black machines; IBM and Sony sell machines with gentle curves instead of a beige box with very square edges. The iPod went on to change digital electronics; its popularity shows that people do care about size and style even at a higher cost.

      I've seen no products, and I avoid websites that use the Aqua badness: the slow-loading pale hard-to-read low-contrast buttons violate principles of good site design.

      Hmm you don't see any kind of resemblance between Aqua and Luna (aka Windows XP)? Get your eyes checked.

      Xerox gave the world the mouse and pointer. (and Microsoft, Apple, Amiga, and Atari then gave it to their users) The GUI has been around in one form or another for longer than you realize: I saw GUI's on software for Commodore PET and Atari back in the late 1970s. It is a common misconception that Jobs (or Apple) invented these.

      No Apple didn't event the GUI. But they popularized it. That's an achievement in and of itself. Up until the Mac was released (and its predecssor the Apple Lisa) the computing world was green on black text with DOS like prompts. Xerox didnt' want to touch personal computers, as they thought the future was in massive servers, and their engineers could not make the Xerox GUI run on anything close to a personal computer. Once Jobs saw the GUI he pushed his team to re-envision the Macintosh as a personal computer with a GUI, which was quite an engineering feat as well as a great bit of foresight on Jobs to think that the market would accept such a big change from their traditional computer.

      Jobs also did a great deal to further the "personal computer". Up until the Apple I was released, personal computers were not popular, let alone affordable. Now the digital hub metaphor which he introduced several years ago is being copied by Dell, Sony and Microsoft (although current versions of Mac OS X are still way ahead of Longhorn in this respect).
    2. Re:Little influence by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      hey, wait a minute. Is this why they have USB on some of those grills?

      --
      C|N>K
  160. Who says buying his poster is pathetic?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Most of you tools mindlessly agree with his opinions, believe he can do no wrong, and viciously attack anyone who hints that he might be fallable. You do this every day in your posts to this website.

    Sure sounds like a cult to me - you might as well go ahead and order your messiah's mugshot to hang over your shrine.

    p.s. Being a geek isn't cool anymore, sorry.

  161. A note on # 4.... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I thought it was interesting that number 4 was the President of China. Note that he is an advocate of Open Source alternative to Windows...

    No 4. Hu Jintaopresident, China

    Last year's position : Not Placed

    With China, size is everything and a population of some 1.3 billion people means the modernisation of Chinese society will turn the country into the most lucrative technology market in the world. The country already has 300 million mobile phone users - twice that of the US.

    Panellist Ajay Chowdhury, managing partner at IDG Ventures Europe, said: "It will influence the world of technology in many different ways. First as a market and second as a lot of technology comes out of China. It is motoring ahead at a rate of knots."

    But it is clear already that new president Jintao, the man charged with guiding China to its new superpower status, is not just going to throw its doors open to the usual western technology giants. The Chinese government is looking to develop its own 3G standard, while its support for the development of an open source alternative to Windows has already had Microsoft, somewhat ironically, complaining of anti-competitive practices.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  162. The SC decided that ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    W won the vote and that recounting would cast doubts on their decision that W had won the vote. Hence, the selected President of the United States *.

    Don't forget the asterisk.
    History won't.

    1. Re:The SC decided that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Don't forget the asterisk.
      >>History won't.

      Unless your first name is "History", it's already forgotten.

    2. Re:The SC decided that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>recounting would cast doubts on their decision that W had won the vote

      I wish I could insert the picture of that cover of Time magazine of a man looking at a vote card by holding it up to the light and checking to see if the right hole was punched. Those were the lengths democrats were willing to go to win the election.

      Again, get on with your life*.

    3. Re:The SC decided that ... by Sevn · · Score: 1

      It's pretty shaky how he won. Click on the link in my sig then shush. :) That's history for ya.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  163. Shocking... by killermal · · Score: 1

    I dont see Cowboy Neal in the top 50.. what's with this shit.

  164. most powerful men? by Scottarius · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize they were naming men Donna and Naomi now.

  165. The voters selected him. That = election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There had already been recounts. The SC just let the actual election results stand and they cancelled a requested recount that would have allowed vote-tampering and counting voteless ballots as Gore votes.

  166. SC had nothing to do with it. The voters decided. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The voters decided as always, and the voters choose him in enough states to win the Electoral College vote.

    The SC had nothing to do with this: they refused to take seriously a frivolous attempt to tamper with the ballots.

  167. Clinton intentionally let Osama get away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And incidentally, I seem to remember Clinton firing cruise missiles at Osama"

    Yet, at another time, the Sudanese government offered to hand over Osama for free. Clinton refused. In this, he got a lot closer than Bush did to getting Osama, and he deliberately let him go.

    "The [moderates and conservatives need] to get past this whole Clinton thing"

    We're still reeling from the recession that started in Clinton's time. We can move passt Clinton once we can shake free of the great damage of his policies. Clinton' still running around the country lying about things in an effort to block economic recovery.

    1. Re:Clinton intentionally let Osama get away by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Yet, at another time, the Sudanese government offered to hand over Osama for free. Clinton refused. In this, he got a lot closer than Bush did to getting Osama, and he deliberately let him go.

      That's false. When the US government looked into these claims from a Sudanese informant they were told by the Sudanese governement that it was not true and they would not hand him over.

      We're still reeling from the recession that started in Clinton's time. We can move passt Clinton once we can shake free of the great damage of his policies. Clinton' still running around the country lying about things in an effort to block economic recovery.

      HAHA. Clinton's 8 years in office resulted in the biggest growth in the history of any nation. The bubble burst when George took over and the tax cuts for the rich won't do any good. I thought we learned in the 80's (when Regean tripled the national debt) that trickle down economics (aka voodoo economics) doesn't work. It's unfortunate that the bottom 60 percent only get 14 percent of the tax break.

      You're only fooling yourself and others just as uninformed as you.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    2. Re:Clinton intentionally let Osama get away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Clinton's 8 years in office resulted in the biggest growth in the history of any nation. The bubble burst when George took over and the tax cuts for the rich won't do any good."

      You don't remember the tech crash which started this? It took place long before Bush was even elected.

      "I thought we learned in the 80's (when Regean tripled the national debt) that [supply-side economics] doesn't work

      It worked very well: it actually greatly increased tax revenue coming in. The problem was that Reagan was too weak to veto the Democrat budgets which increased waste spending even more.

  168. Did you point out the reason we are still in it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you point out the reason we are still in recession? Tom Daschle, the Democrat leader, has successfully managed to block all attempts to get the economy going again. This includes fighting to get the tax-cuts-for-all-taxpayers reduced to the point where they have helped little.

    The reasons for Daschle encouraging economic misery are very clear: a bad economy and lots of people out of work in November 2004 could help Democrats at the polls.

  169. British Whatevers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is up with all those obscure British officals?

  170. Re:Angle Grinder Man -- The Most Powerful Man in T by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    "Long live air poisoning and parking that blocks roads and endangers life."

    If a car is parked in such a way that it blocks a road, you'd be daft to boot it now wouldn't you?

    Daft bugger.

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  171. Time to move on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's just funny, considering this sub-thread started with yet another whine about the 2000 election."

    Talk about refusing to move on! Gore lost the election: get over it.

    By the way, have you noticed the rich irony about moveon.org?

    Moveon.org was started on the idea that a politician should be able to get away with sexual harassment and other crimes if he has "good" policies.

    Yet, last week, they joined the effort to, you guess it, attack Arnold Schwarzenegger for his sexual harassment problem.

    I should not condemn too much. Moveon.org's fundraising could bring to reality the Dean candidacy and the resulting huge Bush landslide in November.

    1. Re:Time to move on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I hadn't noticed that, but I'll check it out. Thanks.

      I think Clark and Dean could easily scuttle each other, but I wouldn't count on that getting a "Bush landslide".

      Let's face it, people are tired of Bush's "kill all the foreigners for Jesus" policies, and the resurrection of Reaganomics has reminded everybody why they voted George Sr. out in the first place.

  172. I must defend my beer choice by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    Here in most of the US (except maybe NY, and some of the more metropolitan areas), Guiness is just about the only stout you can find on tap. I like it, and I do like other darker beers... I just can't find them on tap.

    "but you can get them in some stores." Feh. Don't even get me started on buying bottled beers... many of them, guiness included, are horrible out of the bottle (guiness in cans is much better... you actually get a decent head).

    That's not to say I haven't had some damned good beers overseas... I have... they just aren't available here.

    I'm not a beer snob; different strokes for different folks... you should drink what you like. For my own part, I'd have to say that I like guiness.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:I must defend my beer choice by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Actually the guiness bottle with the widget isn't too bad. The downside to it is that it's 12oz and not a pint. The can's are pretty good, but if it has sat too long, I can very often taste the aluminum. Coming from oklahoma and texas, I find that the Pacific Northwest (seattle specifically for me) is beer heaven. There are hundreds of local stouts and porters to try, and everyone has got something on tap. I've also found a pretty good beer store. They seem to do enough buisness that the beer is always fresh. That's where I go if I want to get a Boddington's or a Young's.

      Speaking of foreign beers. My girlfriend is a big fan of abbey style beers from belgium. Her favorite being leffe dark. Leffe is imported to the US but I've only ever seen the blonde. Has anyone seen the dark? Perhaps in canada?

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:I must defend my beer choice by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      agreed... that little nitrogen capsule widget thingy in the newer guiness cans makes all the difference in the world... didn't know they had added it to the bottles (stopped drinking those years ago).

      Now, normally I'd say bottled beer tastes truer to the tap than canned beer; like you, I find that the aluminum (I assume it's the aluminum) does something to the taste. I find this to be true even with stronger-tasting beers, though it's particularly noticeable in the lighter, thinner american beers.

      Heh... then again, maybe it's all in my imagination... I've never done a double-blind "pepsi challenge," with beer from the bottle and beer from the can.

      Actually, that seems like a good excuse for me to go drink some beer.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  173. They are a very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The legacy-free machines are a bad idea. All of them, including the iMac which did not work with standard Apple peripherals, are coming out at the wrong time.

    Legacy machines that don't have CGA adaptors and don't run 5.25" floppies? Good idea. Those two technologies are dead.

    Legacy machines that don't use floppies or don't interface with the standard Centronics printer interface? Bad idea. These may be on the way out, but they are still used a lot, still sold a lot, and are still of use.

    The PC industry took so long because the "crippled and less useful is good" idea is of dubious merit.

  174. Three years later ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    the recession is going strong.

    It takes an especially bad President * to have every major financial measure he's ever sent passed (all massive tax cuts, of course), control both Congress and the Senate and have an net loss of jobs (the first time in 70 years!).

    The asterisk refers to the fact that W was selected by the SC, bypassing the Constitution (and the majority of citizens who didn't vote for him, including the majority in Florida which had the necessary electoral college votes to elect the correct President.

    1. Re:Three years later ... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      ...have every major financial measure he's ever sent passed (all massive tax cuts, of course)...

      Give some credit to Bush. His massive tax cuts were actually reduced quite a bit. Instead of having a $500b deficit, USA could have ended up with an even greater deficit--not to mention the wealthy receiving even greater of the taxes back.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  175. Jobs did not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Jobs brought us firewire, no-floppy computers, usb "

    He brought us firewire. yes. (read on)

    No-floppy computers? Sorry, he did not. IBM sold crippled floppy-less PC's at the beginning. This is not a good idea: it is bad one that few copy. It is not a good thing to sell something without a useful feature. That's why most PC's have floppies (along with the DVD or CDRW burner).

    USB? He did not bring us this. It would all over the place before the iMac.

    " the Aqua look and feel"

    These unreadable icons will die a quick death. Thankfully, few are following the lead. Look for Apple to ditch it when the paradigm of "make icons readable" returns.

    "All of these are things that other companies have since adopted or tried to copy"

    No, you listed either bad ideas that few copy (like crippled machines without removable storage) or ideas that you are mistaken on and Jobs joined in later (like USB). We could also mention an old Job's favorite: "eject the disk with a bent paperclip in a hole. It is so much better than an eject button". No one copied this. Eventually, Jobs had to follow the leaders: there are now eject buttons on Macs.

    "What has any one person at Sony done that compares to that list (and is copied by others in the industry)?"

    Actually, the one innovation you did name that finds favor outside of Apple's niche that Jobs was involved with was Firewire, which he did.... alongside Sony.

    1. Re:Jobs did not.... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      No-floppy computers? Sorry, he did not. IBM sold crippled floppy-less PC's at the beginning. This is not a good idea: it is bad one that few copy. It is not a good thing to sell something without a useful feature. That's why most PC's have floppies (along with the DVD or CDRW burner).

      Computers without floppy drives are not crippled, unless you need to use a floppy to interact with an old computer that can't use something better for some reason. For example, it might be a convenient way to transport small files (word processing documents, for example) to/from a computer that doesn't have Internet access, and I'll need to use floppies the next time I upgrade the OS on my 486. If you need these features, you can buy a floppy drive. But there's no reason for every computer in my house to have one.

      USB? He did not bring us this. It would all over the place before the iMac.

      USB was on motherboards; there were almost no USB peripherals. The first USB printer to hit the market was made by Epson, and it had translucent blue plastic to match the iMac.

      These unreadable icons will die a quick death. Thankfully, few are following the lead. Look for Apple to ditch it when the paradigm of "make icons readable" returns.

      I'm with you on that.

      We could also mention an old Job's favorite: "eject the disk with a bent paperclip in a hole. It is so much better than an eject button". No one copied this.

      Sun did, I believe.

      Eventually, Jobs had to follow the leaders: there are now eject buttons on Macs.

      There are now CD eject buttons on Mac keyboards. Previously, there had always been eject buttons on Mac CD-ROM drives, as well as other Mac removable media drives such as Zip drives, external floppy drives, etc. Newer Macs do not have accessible eject buttons on them, relying on the keyboard button instead. What does this have to do with your point?

      It should be noted that nearly all removable media drives have a paperclip hole, except PC floppy drives which have a manual eject button. Try to find some that don't.

      Actually, the one innovation you did name that finds favor outside of Apple's niche that Jobs was involved with was Firewire, which he did.... alongside Sony.

      Then why didn't Sony win the Emmy?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  176. Linux/Unix recruiting by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

    I found it amusing that when I clicked on the web site for the company hiring Linux/C++ developers, I got:

    This site is best viewed with Internet Explorer 4 or higher.

    Since you are not using Internet Explorer 4 or higher,
    you are being redirected to the no-frills version of this site.

    If this page does not refresh by itself, click here to continue

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Linux/Unix recruiting by Odinson · · Score: 1

      Holy cow, they get a big confused DUH?

  177. Destruction of the Taliban? Crippling of AlQuaeda? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Liberation of the Afghan people? Osama in millions of pieces?

    Today, we had the US Special Envoy to Afghanistan warn of "spectacular attacks" by the Taliban against US forces. On Sept. 22, we had news about Mullah Omar (you remember how W missed him as well as Osama) having a big meeting with the reformed Taliban in Pakistan. And even the CIA doesn't actually think Osama is dead yet. And liberating the country and handing control of most of it to rival warlords isn't what W said the fight was all about.

    As for your "we're recovering from nicely; I know how that must disappoint you" comment on the recession, a jobless recovery with a fundamentals this weak, not to mention the first net loss of jobs in over 70 years, doesn't constitute recovering OR nicely as far as I'm concerned.

  178. Weird placements by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1
    I'm sure Scott McNealy and Larry Ellison are not too content with their positions :) Jeff Bozos is obviously 'underrated', but that'll improve next year.

    Worse yet, someone seems to have switched Bill Gates with Steve Ballmer - seems not many notice who's truely calling the shots at MS these days. It's Steve with his bullyness, not Bill with his nerdy curiosity.

    As for Linus, I note that he's up from 21 last year. Things are going well.

    The remark that his best work is in the past is just silly - his best work is not his coding (which is fine), but in his social skills which are phenomenal. If RMS would discover this, he might make it to the list one day, too :)

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  179. Re:Negate? No. by jvollmer · · Score: 1
    The beauty here is that Linus' contribution is that he has given the power to everyone else.

    If it's not Consolidated Lint, it's just fuzz!

  180. Apple had nothing to do with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The fruit color sensation didn't last, but the transformation of the computer from a simple beige box to a fashion statement has not. Dell's computers are sleek black machines;"

    You are forgetting that Toshiba, a PC manufacturer, had swoopy black computers long before the iMac came out.

    "Up until the Mac was released (and its predecssor the Apple Lisa) the computing world was green on black text with DOS like prompts."

    "Jobs also did a great deal to further the "personal computer""

    IBM actually invented the PC around 1981.

    "Up until the Apple I was released, personal computers were not popular, let alone affordable."

    You have the history wrong (and these were microcomputers, not personal computers). The "Apple 1" is a historic footnote (in 1976 actually. It was never popular. The Apple ][ in 1977 was one of several popular machines to come out in that year, including the TRS-80 and PET, which were popular and much more affordable than the Apple ][.

    "No Apple didn't event the GUI. But they popularized it."

    No, they never did. You can never popularize anything if it only sells to a tiny niche market. They were just one of many small niche players with a GUI OS.

    "Hmm you don't see any kind of resemblance between Aqua and Luna (aka Windows XP)? Get your eyes checked.

    Get your eyes checked indeed. The horrid washed-out look of XP is an eye killer: a step down from the previous versions. The first thing to do in XP is to restore it to "readable icons"

    " Up until the Mac was released... the computing world was green on black text with DOS like prompts.

    The first Mac came out at a time when Atari and colorful others were still around. Only the PC's had the green on black. Color by that time was pretty much a standard, even on the lowly VIC-20. The monochrome first Mac was a step backwards.

    "Once Jobs saw the GUI he pushed his team to re-envision the Macintosh as a personal computer with a GUI,"

    Except it wasn't a PC. It was a non-PC microcomputer. Apple has yet to make PC's.

    "as a great bit of foresight on Jobs to think that the market would accept such a big change from their traditional computer."

    The market never did accept it from Apple, really. Others went on to adopt the Xerox ideas. Apple never again gained the influence and dominance it had around 1979.

    1. Re:Apple had nothing to do with it. by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      Except it wasn't a PC. It was a non-PC microcomputer. Apple has yet to make PC's.

      From M-W.com's:

      One entry found for personal computer.
      Main Entry: personal computer
      Function: noun
      Date: 1977
      : a general-purpose computer equipped with a microprocessor and designed to run especially commercial software (as a word processor or World Wide Web browser) for an individual user

      Macs seem to be "general purpose", have a microprocessor, and designed to run especially commerical software. Word, Photoshop, iTunes, etc.

      So acording to the dictionary definition, Apple computers qualify as "PC's".

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  181. Bush policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Let's face it, people are tired of Bush's "kill all the foreigners for Jesus" policies"

    Except he does not have anything like a policy. It is more like "save the lives of foreigners"; he headed off the Taliban-induced famine, and even if you count in the Iraqis Saddam killed during the bombings by using them as human shields, the death rate is going down in Iraq very fast (Saddam used to execute on average 10,000 - 20,000 civilians a year).

    Yes, it is saving lives. Jesus? Perhaps. But the real reason is that it is sensible policy.

    "and the resurrection of Reaganomics has reminded everybody why they voted George Sr. out in the first place."

    Reaganomics was excellent, and popular. (what else can you say about the idea of letting the people keep more of what they earn) The reason George H. W. Bush was voted out is because he forgot this and broke his tax pledge (which caused a recession).

  182. Well that makes me feel kinda funny by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "If it wasn't for the presence of Lara Croft and Xena Warrior Princess, techies around the world would have posters of Torvalds on their wall."

    It's times like this, I'm proud to be a Windows user.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  183. No, you forget. He was elected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The asterisk refers to the fact that W was selected by the SC, bypassing the Constitution "

    That is not a fact. Actually, it is a lie.

    Bush was elected the exact same way that his predecessors were: he got enough votes in enough states to get the electoral votes. All the SC did was shut off an attempt to tamper with the ballots.

    "including the majority in Florida which had the necessary electoral college votes to elect the correct President."

    The majority in Florida did indeed vote for the man was elected President and now is in the White House. The only way you can get more Gore votes is by counting ballots that had no Gore votes on them at all.

    The asterisk you place there merely means "I don't like his politics, so I refuse to recognize the fact that he was elected".

    You are exactly like the right-wing boobs I know who said the same thing about Clinton, with theories (just as silly as the Florida claims) about Chinese campaign money and buying off Perot).

    You kooks are all the same.

  184. It was vote-tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wish I could insert the picture of that cover of Time magazine of a man looking at a vote card by holding it up to the light and checking to see if the right hole was punched."

    You should have seen the other photos of the rooms where they were "counting" (voting is more like it): the floors were covered with chads.

  185. Gorebot campaign strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Besides, the Gorebot couldn't have beaten Bozo the Clown with his campaign strategies."

    Yes. Lie to people, promise to tax the hell out of the overtaxed public, intone in a synthesized voice "there is no controlling legal authority [beep]", commit massive campaign finance crimes,and take credit for the creation of the Internet. What a way to run a campaign.

    1. Re:Gorebot campaign strategy by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Yes. Lie to people

      Give one example.

      take credit for the creation of the Internet

      At least the people who still bitch about the 2000 election have a reason to. Gore took credit for the funding of the Internet because he took the initiative to get funding for it. Before Gore got involved it was still Arpanet. He never claimed that he invented it, only that he was a major factor in its creation, which he was and you should be thankful or else you wouldn't be able to spread your filthy lies on slashdot.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
  186. Al Gore invented the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al Gore invented the Internet. He said so on CNN.

    LEt the silly objections roll in:

    "He never said he invented it" - wrong: look in a dictionary. Create = invent.

    "This came from Limbaugh" - wrong: it was on CNN, still archived on CNN pages.

    "He really did invent it when in Congress" - wrong: the Internet was started a few years before Gore's election.

    "Important Internet inventors defend him" - irrelevant: they liked that he helped the Internet long after it was created. They do not claim that he invented it.

    "But he created totay's commercial Internet" - wrong. He didn't, and that was not his claim. Trying to alter Gore's comment into a true one still leaves his actual words as a falsehood. Putting word into his mouth do not change the public record.

    "But he did so much good in Congress for the Internet" - Irrelevant. That does not make his claim of creating it any more true.

  187. and the moral of the story is... by mantera · · Score: 1

    It's more important to be a successful entrepreneur than a successful technician or technologist. The same probably applies in other fields of industry or services.

    I think it's time those involved with education start giving as much or even more attention to entrepreneurial, economic, or financial literacy than they currently do to technology, computing or information literacy.

  188. Re:Angle Grinder Man -- The Most Powerful Man in T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err, no. Because you clamp it before it gets towed off. Otherwise you could park any car in a way that blocks a road and know you'd never get punished. Fool.

  189. WANK WANK WANK *hey!* WANK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, I'm married, not an idiot, and naturally cute, so I could give a fuck about appearing sensitive to women on an anonymous geek forum.

    Krikey! Are you sensitive to anonymous urinal hole-in-wall poop sex in bathrooms too?

    Of course it is left to you to figure out my gender. You get 2 guesses.

    You are SHE-MAN, masturbator of GaySkull! I always dreamt my whole life to meet you in person! I loved your cartoons, you are my hero!

  190. Previous year's Agenda Setters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just noticed silicon.com has done this every year for a few years - interesting to see how previous predictions worked out... Check out http://www.silicon.com/as2002 ...for last year's predictions.

  191. Greg Dyke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I'm surprised at Number 3...I've never heard of him

    He heads up a small outfit called the BBC. They do a bit of reporting every now and again. You might have seen some of their articles linked from slashdot sometime - it happens occasionally.

    Anyway, you clearly haven't been following the Hutton enquiry into the death of Dr. David Kelly (the affair that should be toppling the British government any time now). Grey Dyke has been a prominent witness. Let me guess, you're not from this side of the Atlantic, are you?

  192. He got enough votes in the SC by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    He didn't have enough votes by the citizens of Florida. An inaccurate vote count was accepted by W's state campaign chief in the state run by W's brother. The SC then decided that W had won and that any recount will cast doubt on their decision that W won.

    The fact that I dislike his politics doesn't change the fact that he was selected not elected. Even Rutherford B. Hayes doesn't have an asterisk. He wasn't handed the election by the SC.

  193. The vote count was accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He didn't have enough votes by the citizens of Florida. An inaccurate vote count was accepted by W's state campaign "

    He had more votes than the other guys, which is how you win. The accurate count was accepted by W's state campaign. It only counted actual votes.

    "and that any recount will cast doubt on their decision that W won."

    No, there were recounts before. Bush won them all. He would have also won the recount that the Gore team asked for.

    "The fact that I dislike his politics doesn't change the fact that he was selected not elected"

    In Bush's case, the two are the same. Same with any president. Election is the method for selection. That's how we choose our President.

    "Even Rutherford B. Hayes doesn't have an asterisk"

    No, but Clinton does. He and another guy were impeached. (Bush only has an asterisk according to a few extremists who would not accept the fact of his election even if he had 90% popular vote and 100% electoral vote: they are so twisted with hate)

    "He wasn't handed the election by the SC."

    Nor was Bush. He won the election fair and square.

  194. SPOTUS* by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Bush had less votes. The Supreme Court handed him the election anyway. He was selected by them, not the people of the United States.

    By the way, I note you've avoided that whole 3 years of recession, passed every finance measure he wanted (all tax cuts), his party controls both houses and has the first net loss of jobs in 70 years thing. Hasn't the RNC given you the spin sheet on that one yet?

    Heck, I didn't even mention budget surplus to largest budget deficit in history!

  195. Ridiculous List by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    How does Steve Jobs get to the top of that list? For giving us iTunes and that neat little media player?

    I don't honestly think that he even deserves a top 50 place. Sure, he was influential in the past, but if you are talking about now...let's just say that people running Anti-RIAA sites are probably more influential.

    Ellison deserves to be top 5.

    Stallman and Raymond should be in the 50.

    Darl McBride (for all the wrong reasons) should be in the 50.

  196. Screw-cap wine by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    There's nothing wrong with the screw-cap as a stopper for wine. People have tested wines stored with a screw-cap against those stored using a cork, and the screw-cap mostly wins out because you don't get the fungus that causes wine to be 'corked'. It is thought that wines which are 'laid down' for 10+years may gain from the effect of the cork which screw caps will not imbue.

    The only reason why screw-cap wine is generally worse is that people don't put good wine in it as a rule (although this is changing).

  197. LMAO - Mods on CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait? WTF is up with these stupid /. editors?

    Surprised Al hasn't come up yet lmao. Good one!

  198. Timing by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
    "I'm surprised your Kryptonian metabolism is vulnerable to the effects of alcohol, Superman."

    "Mike, I'm married to my unattractive wife who is terrible in bed, so I have to sleep with her. But why you?"

    "It takes three (_____) to change the lightbulb: one of the (_____) holds the lightbulb while the other two rotate the ladder. Afterwards they throw the used lightbulb away."

  199. Jobs has nothing to do with USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "windows didin't suport it, the motherboards did have it, but there where no compatible devices"

    My Windows box has USB, it was supported, and there were devices before the iMac ever came out.

    "the iMac made USB what it is today by only having THAT tipe of conection."

    No, it did not. USB growth started from when it was introduced before the iMac, and it grew as it would have whether or not the iMac existed.

    You can make your Jobs case for firewire, but you can't make it for USB.

    "but it was YEARS before pc come with a sound card and all of the multimedia stuf, he made the fist mac ship with integrated sound."

    He was also followere here. When the first mac came out, the PC did not have sound, but there were plenty of other machines out there that had more sophisisticated sound than the Apple 2 did for years.

    "Steve was also, a very importan driving force in all of the "TrueType" fonts development"

    That is true. So you were able to claim 3 Jobs innovations, and only one was true. To help you out, I cam up with one you forgot.

  200. Apple did not sell the GUI first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apple didn't "invent" the GUI- they were only the first company to actually sell it to customers and make it usable"

    No, they were not first. Not by years. Plenty of other software had GUI. Apple was first, as far as I know with selling a GUI OS, but they were not first with a GUI period.

    "And OS X does lots, lots, lots that Linux doesn't do. Like run useful and well designed applications"

    The amount of applications for OS-X are quite meager and threadbare compared to what you have for *NIX and the pc.

  201. POTUS * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bush had less votes. The Supreme Court handed him the election anyway"

    No, he had more votes.They were counted several times. The Florida voters handed him the election (the SC did nothing except ignore it when Gore's lawyers lied to them)

    "By the way, I note you've avoided that whole 3 years of recession"

    This has been addressed. Tom Daschle has been able to get the votes to keep the recession going.

    "passed every finance measure he wanted (all tax cuts)"

    No, he did not. The Democrats in Congress were abel to reduce the tax cuts so they would be much less helpful.

    "Hasn't the RNC given you the spin sheet on that one yet"

    I'm not a republican.I'm interested in truth, not spin.

    "Hasn't the RNC given you the spin sheet on that one yet"

    There was no surplus. Clinton left the country deeper in debt than it was when he started (check the facts: he added trillions to the debt).

    * The asterisk means that yes, the American people can elect presidents who are not left-wing extremists. It is allowed.

  202. This being the same.. by Handpaper · · Score: 1

    silicon.com that ran the "Torvalds for Governor" story? They've removed the original from their site and replaced it with this apology but both they and zdnet were fooled.

  203. The list is very wrong!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But for now Murdoch still sits on the throne of the largest media empire in the world and arguably holds more influence over the way we think, work, spend and live than any other person on the planet"

    And he ranks 11? Last years number 1? Sure the stock has been a bit shakey but this is the man that inspired a Bond villan!! This is the guy who wrote the book that Bill Gates read on running a monopoly and world domination. In soviet Russia you may be able to control Murdoch, but here Murdoch controls you!!

    Vajpayee ranks above god?

    Sobig writer is bigger than the CEO of Microsoft? Come on please...

  204. What about... by kumachan · · Score: 1

    ...the guy who invented patents? Is he on the list?

  205. Mac != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So acording to the dictionary definition, Apple computers qualify as "PC's". "

    Not according to anyone else, however. You've got your MacMall, and you've got your PCMall. I dare you to buy mac software from the PC Mall site.

    You've got PC Magazine. I guess they must give a lot of Mac coverage.

    You've even got Apple, which has advertisement comparing Macintoshes to PC's.

    "personal computer" was one of a few terms being bounced around before the IBM "PC". Home computer and microcomputer were more common terms.

    1. Re:Mac != PC by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      Actully, if I remember from my early days with personal computers, there were IBM's and IBM compatiables. "PC's" as found as your defition of describing any computer running on an x86 architecture didn't happen until at least the late 1980's, when it refered to any computer that was not a time-share or mainframe. At which point, you either ran an IBM, IBM-clone, or an Apple.

      Sometime in the either mid or late 1990's only then did PC's come to mean a computer with an Intel Chip and Windows. Today its a computer with an x86 chip.

      But what we call PC's today in slang is not the true meaning of the word first recorded in 1977 by Mr. Websters. According to that definition, Apple running any Macintosh OS other than their Xserve qualify, by defition provided in my earlier post, as a "Personal Computer".

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  206. But Hu's the fourth most powerful? by The+Monster · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I can't see Hu Jintao's name without thinking of Hu's on First

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:But Hu's the fourth most powerful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he's the brother of Hu Jerection.

  207. USB and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple did not invent USB, but it was the first company which promoted it. In 1998-1999 most third party USB devices available were designed for macs.

    It is strange, firewire is apple's baby, they introduced it in 1989-89 but they started using USB long before firewire

  208. Re:SC had nothing to do with it. The voters decide by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
    Actually you are totally wrong. The AP did a detailed study of the vote and concluded that Gore won the vote no matter how you counted it. The state of Florida explicitly allows recounts but the Supreme Court decided to end the recounts because if the vote got certified in time it could not be challenged. They decided it was more important to install Bush as President to keep the presidency from being challenged in congress. The Republicans bussed in people from other states to cause riots and stop the recounts. The IRS confirms that the Bush recount committee paid people to riot and three of the rioters are now on the White House staff.

    Rioters paid by Bush

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  209. Re: translation by moncyb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, what a lame fuck you are. Some people have a life.

  210. So where is Bill Joy? by Tpenta · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of surprised that he didn't make the list.

    Tp.

  211. Steve Jobs - still doing great!!! by MozillaFireBird · · Score: 1

    That's one hell of a list. Nice to see Torvalds at the 5th place...More surprising is to see the prime minister of India on 8th place :-)

    --
    Happy Hacking!!!
  212. Jobs #1???? by Arbogast_II · · Score: 1

    Huh??? How does Jobs even make the top 10 in the 20th century??? To rank him above Bill Gates is an absudity??? Jobs is a Bill Gates wannabe!!!

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com
  213. OMG they left out someone. by sjwt · · Score: 1

    I dont see Kats from Zero Wing there.

    All your top50s are belong to us!

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  214. I for one, welcome our new.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tech, 5th removed, overlord!

    Perhaps like the American congress, if the guys ahead of them are wiped out he'll become number one? Go, Linus, Go! We're number one! We're number one! ..

  215. Ho Ho HO! by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    Darl is a number two on my list.

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  216. No by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    Look at it: Sobig is 42 the meaning of life is to be so big you jiggle like a bowl full of jelly! HoHOho

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  217. hohoho by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    you mean 0-31 however, 0 - 61 would have been acceptable. 110001 would have been tring to hard, so it wouldn't count. hohoho, I love a good pun.

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  218. the forgot the MOST influencial aggenda setter.. by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    ..The consumer. I don't care what anybody on that list has on there agenda, it will change if the consumer doesn't buy into it.

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  219. CowboyNeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously they aren't up on things. Everyone knows CowboyNeal has all the power around here ...

  220. What about RMS by goon · · Score: 1

    pretty simple really ... the article makes an assumption of P == $ (power/influence is directly proportional to money). The writers are only looking at people who are financially influential. And totally miss RMS who engineered a paradigm shift in software

    (btw read *Free as in Freedom* it's freely availiable online by oreilly).

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  221. AOL by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    In part of 1995 and 1996 it was so bad that our site had to put a warning for AOL. It was something to the effect of "You have reached the World Wide Web. This is not AOL nor are any pages you see from now onward."

    I wish I'd saved a screen shot.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  222. Klaus Knopper by o'reor · · Score: 1
    From my point of view, one of the most influential guys in the Linux world in the last few months has been Klaus Knopper, the developer and maintainer of Knoppix.

    His distribution is one of the most powerful in terms of automated hardware detection; it is also very attractive for people who are willing to try a Linux distribution, but without having to touch their hard disks; and it has generated a flurry of derivatives for all needs and tastes.

    Kudos to Klaus Knopper and all the Knoppix-based distros !

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  223. Linux had more momentum *before* the suit by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    I see three reasons why Linux won the battle of the minds:

    1. Linus had working code out before Jolitz (who released the first free working BSD distribution, 386BSD).

    2. Jolitz really didn't get how you could be working with the net. He didn't participate much in the public forums, but came with some weird announcements. And he tended to ignore the patches from the community promising something "much better" would be released later. And that meant the the community splintered as first the NetBSD people and later the patchkit people (FreeBSD) gave up on Jolitz, and rolled their own distributions.

    3. The leading BSD developers saw themselves as "computer science profesionals who through great personal sacrifices contributed to the BSD cause". They tended to come from a strong Unix background. The leading Linux developers saw themselves as a bunch of nerds having fun. They tended to come from a MSDOS background, or at most Unix-user-level background. Basically, the Linux people were a lot more fun to hang out with, and had a background more similar to most young nerds looking for a project had.

    At the time AT&T sued BSDI, Linux had already won heart and mind of the young nerds. The lawsuit might have delayed the technical development of some of the free BSD's a bit, but the battle was never one of technical strength.

  224. RMS still writes code by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    He is the current Emacs maintainer, so he has gobe back to his roots, so to speak.

  225. Without Linux GNU would probably have a BSD kernel by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    The kernel really doesn't matter a lot.

    But it is possible that the FSF would not have dropped funding Hurd development, which mean Hurd would have finished long ago. Given that a prefectly good GPL'ed kernel existed (Linux), development of Hurd was no longer important.

  226. The GPL by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    The GPL is more or less a legal expression of RMS's political agenda, and it has been quite influential.

  227. Tax cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Give some credit to Bush. His massive tax cuts were actually reduced quite a bit. Instead of having a $500b deficit, USA could have ended up with an even greater deficit--not to mention the wealthy receiving even greater of the taxes back

    No, if Bush had his way, the defecit would have been much smaller, since the tax cuts he wanted would have caused economic growth and resulted in more tax revenues.

    And, more non-wealthy people would have been able to keep more of their own money (the wealthy were a minority of those who kept more of their own money under his plan)

    1. Re:Tax cuts by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      No, if Bush had his way, the defecit would have been much smaller, since the tax cuts he wanted would have caused economic growth and resulted in more tax revenues.

      Contrary to your supply-side capitalist fantasy, nothing of that sort would have happened. Even when the capitalists, such as the CATO institute and the Wall Street Journal, starts questioning the massive deficit, you know you are on thin ice.

      And, more non-wealthy people would have been able to keep more of their own money (the wealthy were a minority of those who kept more of their own money under his plan)

      What you are saying is in contrast to what the media and most politicians indicated...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  228. Gore's lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Gore took credit for the funding of the Internet because he took the initiative to get funding for it"

    There is a lie there. The creation of the Internet was funded before he got into Congress.

    "He never claimed that he invented it"

    Yes he did. Create = invent. Look in the dictionary. His claim did not mention funding, by the way.

    "...only that he was a major factor in its creation"

    which is a lie, as it was created before he was involved. Check the facts before you try again.

  229. Gore won no counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The AP did a detailed study of the vote and concluded that Gore won the vote no matter how you counted it"

    This is false, as the votes were counted several times and Gore lost each time.

    "They decided it was more important to install Bush as President"

    No, the voters installed Bush as President. Of course it is "more important" to let an elected president serve than it is to give in to lawyers who lie to the court in an effort to overthrow the election.

    "The Republicans bussed in people from other states to cause riots and stop the recounts"

    Those stupid innefectual Republicans. The votes were recounted anyway and Gore lost.

  230. So apple still has hard to use ejection system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Newer Macs do not have accessible eject buttons on them, relying on the keyboard button instead. What does this have to do with your point?"

    I'll have to take your word on it, since I know no-one with a Mac and they aren't sold in the stores. They are STILL keeping with this design blunder where there is a pinhole instead of an eject button?

    "Computers without floppy drives are not crippled, unless you need to use a floppy to interact with an old computer "

    You can probably say this in 2003, but you could not say this in the year the iMac was introduced: when floppies were much more useful. this was a design flaw.

    No, he did not bring us USB at all. The peripherals would have been introduced regardless of the iMac.

  231. Apple was not first with USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apple did not invent USB, but it was the first company which promoted it"

    No, they were a latecomer. Toshiba and others had USB on their machines and were promoting it long before the iMac.

  232. Al GOre by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine the inventer of the internet would be pretty influencial!

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  233. The bubble burst on Clinton's watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The bubble burst when George took over.

    Please see this BBC page from early in 2000

    This is all well-documented all over, and is pretty much incontrovertable. The bubble burst well before Bush was elected, and even longer before he took office, and yet longer before he started to influence economic policy.

    You can't change history.

    1. Re:The bubble burst on Clinton's watch by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      You can't change history.

      Then you can't negate 8 years of expansion. The largest expansion in history.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
  234. Xena and Lara by triptolemeus · · Score: 1

    Never heard of them.

    Anyone know why they should deserve a place next to my Linus posters?
    --
    The site where: "I'm right, as long as you ignore the things that prove me wrong", became a valid method of debate.
  235. Meanwhile, on Planet Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He never claimed that he invented it, only that he was a major factor in its creation
    Create = invent. Look in the dictionary.
    AHA! I've discovered the source of the apparent cognitive dissonance in right-wing loonies!

    They can't read!!!

    Y'know, this explains how they can go around calling Clinton a "draft-dodger" while giving Bush (dodger+deserter) and Quayle (dodger) a free pass.

    Contribute to Laura Bush's reading charities, and help these poor souls learn to function in modern America!
    1. Re:Meanwhile, on Planet Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "AHA! I've discovered the source of the apparent cognitive dissonance in right-wing loonies! They can't read!!!"

      Have you checked the dictionary, or a thesaurus yet, concerning the word "Create"? Seems you are the one who cannot read.

      " Bush (dodger+deserter) and Quayle (dodger) a free pass."

      Both of them served stateside. Any large war effort requires this: non ever consists 100% of those offshore. Neither dodged, neither deserted.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, on Planet Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm, going AWOL for a year is desertion as far as this soldier is concerned.

  236. It is what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Contrary to your supply-side capitalist fantasy, nothing of that sort would have happened."

    Except it works whenever it is tried in the United States, lower taxes have contributed to defecit reduction every time (since they result in increased tax revenue). However, you get defecits if you increase spending of money even beyond the level of the increased revenue.

    "Even when the capitalists, such as the CATO institute and the Wall Street Journal, starts questioning the massive deficit, you know you are on thin ice. "

    Of course, as they should. Bush should use the veto pen and cut spending a lot more. However, if you blame Bush for this part, blame the Democrats even more: they want to waste money more than Bush does: Bush is wasting less money than the Dems would like him to waste.

    "What you are saying is in contrast to what the media and most politicians indicated...

    Only the left-wing media (which does dominate) and left-wing politicians. It is a fact that the tax cut plan gives proportionate tax relief to all taxpayers. The rich are minority of the group of all taxpayers. "Tax cuts for the rich" is a deceptively small part of the picture, but boy it sounds good as a sound bite to ignorant media consumers.

  237. They've got it all wrong. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Torvalds is GOD..

    And the mighty hand of GOD smote the evil empire with kernel 2.6!

  238. In the past? by ralphclark · · Score: 1
    It goes on to say: "In truth Torvalds best work is in the past"... which seems to negate their own argument for having him in there

    Well if that disqualifies him then I should be on the list then, because my best work is in the future. Probably.

  239. Not shaky at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's pretty shaky how he won. Click on the link in my sig then shush"

    Not shaky at all. Rants by partisan hacks should not be taken as serious research. He won fair and square, now you shush and get over it.

    1. Re:Not shaky at all by Sevn · · Score: 1

      Reality check, I'm a moderate conservative. It doesn't change the fact the election was stolen and Dubya is a piss poor President. Not all us conservatives are fucking blind.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  240. Except he did not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm, going AWOL for a year is desertion as far as this soldier is concerned"

    Except he did not. Just an urban legend. Go ahead, show me the military court records where he was charged with AWOL.

  241. You're a left-wing wacko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Dubya "

    Dubya? Isn't that an Arab city or country? No, by using this Molly Ivens insult you are no more "conservative" than Limbaugh was for calling Clinton "Slick Willy" all the time.

    "It doesn't change the fact the election was stolen"

    Winning enough states to get enough electoral votes may be theft to you, but that is how all elections go in the United States.

    " is a piss poor President.

    The moderates and the conservatives approve of him. It is the left-wingers which fall into the disapproval column.

    "Not all us conservatives are fucking blind."

    Us conservatives? No, you are one of "us liberals" who reject the legitimacy of the President just because you do not agree with him.

    1. Re:You're a left-wing wacko by Sevn · · Score: 1

      wow, what a blind motherfucker. Just because I'm a REAL conservative and don't automatically agree with everything the bush regime says about things does not make me a fucking tree hugging liberal. You have issues. I'm very sorry. Agreeing with this current ridiculous regime does not make you a republican. It makes you an idiot just like the people that blindly followed his father. Quit listening to fucking morons like hannity and rush and coutier and grow the fuck up. You are an AMERICAN first and a conservative second. Until you pick up a gun LIKE I HAVE and defend this country in two wars and 3 "conflicts", you don't know SHIT. Period. Get a fucking clue and pray like I do that in 2008 a true conservative candidate comes along that people other than fucking idiots like you and the "nascar dads" and pathetic poor whitetrash brainwashed morons can get behind. I have no respect for a fucking action dodging president that spent a year AWOL from fucking national guard duty for christ sakes while I shot and killed aggressors in a foreign land. The nerve this illiterate moron had going fucking AWOL while I was fighting because of his rich, politically connected father looking out for him. FUCK dubya. You are too young and too fucking stupid to have a GOD damn clue what you are talking about. Just pray with me that we get a republican candidate that isn't a fucking coward in 2008.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    2. Re:You're a left-wing wacko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. I applaud you. Until I read this I had no idea why so many conservative were abandoning the bush Presidency and why his approval rating with Republicans was dropping so fast. This has made me seriously rethink my position on things. It makes me want to say "F*ck You" and "thank you" at the same time. I have a lot to think about. As what I consider myself to be a serious Republican, I have to do some research back a few decades and reaquaint myself with what being a conservative actually means. Thank you for the learning experience. I have not taken up arms for this country, so I give you credit for that important perspective on things. It is very possible that people like me that have been fortunate in this economy that has been hard on the people I generally think of as the undesirables that have gotten what they deserve for not working hard enough might possibly just be getting the shitty end of the stick after all. I am admittedly one of the anonymous 'pussies' you have complained about that have been following your posts for quite some time because I've assumed you are a pathetic brainwashed moonbat liberal asshole ready to make excuses for any demonazi. Going back through your post though, I'm beginning to understand that I simply misjudged you. It amazed me that even though I made you a foe, you almost immediately made me a friend then went on to reply to a bunch of my posts with very logical and non-partisan posts that pretty much make me understand that you are not full of sh*t. I'm not quite ready to reciprocate, but I don't think you are some evil liberal anymore. Thank you for opening up my mind a little. I'm pretty sure you are "StretchCannon" on fark. I have seen a lot of the same types of very valid arguements there as well using the same types of language and conventions for things. And I am right there with you hoping that a candidate that you agree with comes along in 2008 that you can get behind with the rest of the disenfranchised conservatives. Could you posssibly point me towards some online documentation to make me understand more fully where you are coming from??

    3. Re:You're a left-wing wacko by Sevn · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets put it this way. I *HAD* a lot of money in New Bridge Strategies. And I mean a lot. You can find some reality here
      That and I've known Karl Rove since grade school and he has always been a shmuck. He is completely behind this anti-trueconservative presidency. He would have been much better suited as a marketing guru. He has turned the notion of being a conservative into some cool marketing buzzword and gotten an idiot elected president. In the process, he has gotten every professional wresting cum nascar fan cum jerry springer fan behind him. You can tell them because they'll have no idea that I'm not using "cum" in a porn sense. The idiot fucking morons in this country that can unfortunately vote and have the fucking nerve to call themselves republicans simply because they bought the sales pitch after 9/11. Look. I've killed woman and children in the name of democracy. I'm not about to fall for the stupid bullshit Karl and friends have used to brainwash the majority of America in the past 3 years. To a true flag waving Conservative such as myself and a lot of vets I know, Bush is a fucking idiot anacronysm and we can't wait for his pointless ass to go away.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    4. Re:You're a left-wing wacko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Look. I've killed woman and children in the name of democracy. "

      That's your problem.

      " I've known Karl Rove since grade school and he has always been a shmuck"

      Yeah, you're probably the same guy who posted that Steve the Dell Dude was a friend of yours and Jar Jar Binks was your college room-mate as well.

      "To a true flag waving Conservative such as myself"

      Come on, tell who the REAL conservative leader is!

  242. liberal attacks bush claiming to be conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " wow, what a blind motherfucker. Just because I'm a REAL conservative and don't automatically agree with everything the bush regime says about things does not make me a fucking tree hugging liberal"

    I agree with them when they are right, disagree when they are wrong.

    "You have issues. I'm very sorry"

    Keeping the issues in mind is nothing to apologize for.

    "The nerve this illiterate moron had going fucking AWOL"

    He can read quite well, thank you. And he never went AWOL. This nonsense sentence is like attacking Clinton for being Cambodian and for bombing Nigeria.

    "Until you pick up a gun LIKE I HAVE and defend this country in two wars and 3 "conflicts", you don't know SHIT"

    Huh? What does that have to do with anything? I think you hit the hash pipe one too many times in one of those "conflicts".

    "Quit listening to fucking morons like hannity and rush and coutier and grow the fuck up"

    Who is illiterate? You cannot even spell Coulter's name.

  243. Very logical and non-partisan posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "very logical and non-partisan posts"


    "blind mother.......fucking tree hugging liberal. ....ridiculous regime .....idiot.... fucking ...coutier .. grow the fuck up...know SHIT....fucking idiots .... "nascar dads" ... whitetrash brainwashed morons .... fucking action dodging president.... ....for christ sakes ....illiterate moron .....FUCK dubya. ....fucking stupid ....GOD damn tinfoil hat!"

    That other AC is correct. That really IS a convincing logical argument!