Slashdot Mirror


Possible PS2 Price Portent Pondered

Londovir writes "Could Nintendo soon be sharing shelf space at the $99 rack? According to an article on IGN.com, an internal source at Target claims to have received printed fliers with the Playstation 2 listed at $99. If you remember from an earlier story from September, it was an advance newspaper ad from Target (again), as well as a leaked scan of a Wal-Mart ad, that told the world about the GameCube's price before it happened. Given how the GameCube is outselling the PS2 & XBox - would a price drop so low be so unexpected? One last tidbit to contemplate: Sony is ready to roll the manufacturing plants for their smaller 90 nanometer PS2 CPU. Maybe that price drop isn't so unbelievable after all..."

302 comments

  1. Tekken! by ccoder · · Score: 1

    Now I can play more Tekken! Wheeeee!

    --
    "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Tekken! by darien · · Score: 1

      Huh? Dude, what are you planning to do? Buy another PS2 so you can play it twice at once?

  2. but... by neilyos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Will it include the network adapter still?

    1. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The network adapter was never included in the first place.

    2. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... except in the new boxes where the network adapter is included (since about late august?).

    3. Re:but... by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1

      My guess is no -- the $99 price point (assuming that it exists) will probably be to clear out inventory of the original units. I'd bet that the network adapter included model will still be priced higher, though a drop to $149 wouldn't be a surprise.

  3. 2 thoughts by selderrr · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    1. Even if they give them away for free, I don't think I'll play on a console : I'm used to playing with a mouse + used to switch between work & play for 5 minutes of fun between hours of stress. So I'll play on my PC for quite some time to come.

    2. Folks who bought a PS2 at $499 must really feel screwed now. And they say Apple has large profit margins !

    1. Re:2 thoughts by DoorFrame · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt they'll feel screwed. They did get to own and use a PS2 for a year (or more?) before the price dropped so low. It's not like those people are just receiving delivery on their PS2s today.

    2. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, stop being a hater just because you can't afford the cool toys. the ps2 was never 500 bucks, i bought mine the day it came out (still works too) for 300. now the origional playstation was 400 when it came out. the sega saturn was 500 i believe.

    3. Re:2 thoughts by jezzgoodwin · · Score: 1

      1. Then don't buy one then.

      2. Folks who bought their 800mhz PC machines at 1500 must feel screwed now with today's technology prices.

    4. Re:2 thoughts by DS-1107 · · Score: 1
      place the console close to the PC, connect the console to CRT else if the TV (but only if the TV is standing close to the computer) - place controller besides keyboard, or in lap.

      reboot, load - or such.

      klick 'start' on controller - and away you go!

    5. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just take some time off away from the computer...

    6. Re:2 thoughts by quandrum · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't know your circumstances, but number one sounds ridiculous.

      If you don't have enough time, money, or interest with a console, then fine. They aren't for everyone, or even the majority of people. If you've tried a controller for more than a minute and found that it truly is uncomfortable, fine.

      But if you want to play the games that are exclusive to consoles, but aren't because you are afraid of changing to a controller, then, I fear for your future. If you can't manage this small a change, what else in your life are you passing by, because you don't think you can adapt.

      Sorry if I'm too preachy, I just really hate that attitude. I'm not even sure if it's yours. You didn't really give enough info. Enough from me ;)

    7. Re:2 thoughts by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. Even if they give them away for free, I don't think I'll play on a console : I'm used to playing with a mouse + used to switch between work & play for 5 minutes of fun between hours of stress. So I'll play on my PC for quite some time to come.

      Each type of system(console/PC) is strong at different types of games. RPGs and FPSs are usually best in the realm of the PC. Sports games on the other hand, I always find to be much more playable on a console. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

      2. Folks who bought a PS2 at $499 must really feel screwed now. And they say Apple has large profit margins !

      Not really. I got my PS2 the day they dropped to $199. I think I have had it for nearly 1.5 - 2 years now and have definitely gotten my $100 price premium out of it. On a side note, any techie who feels screwed b/c of technology price drops must never sleep a wink. Prices continually drop on computer equipment, so as long as you feel that you/b> got a good deal that is all that matters.

    8. Re:2 thoughts by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Considering how my PS2 is being thoroughly abused by the kids and I haven't even played it in over a year, I don't think I mind having paid 300$ for it a few years back. It's done its time and now my DVD burner is having a field day with Xbox software :) XBMP is a beautiful thing!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    9. Re:2 thoughts by rf0 · · Score: 1

      One thing a console does is isn't-ish gratification. IF I want to play GTA I put in the CD and play. With the PC I have to wait for it to load. put in the CD extra. I'm not saying PC's are better but if you haven't already got it running the consoles can be good

      Rus

    10. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Each type of system(console/PC) is strong at different types of games. RPGs and FPSs are usually best in the realm of the PC. Sports games on the other hand, I always find to be much more playable on a console. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

      RPGs have been better on consoles since the days of the NES and now up to the PS2. PC RPG games seem to be too half assed, buggy, and not really worth the time mainly because they are made by Western game developers. KOTOR is of course the exception, but that is also a console RPG (Xbox) :)

    11. Re:2 thoughts by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      Folks who bought a PS2 at $499 must really feel screwed now. And they say Apple has large profit margins !

      And rightly so, since the price (in US Dollars) at launch was $299.99. Unless they imported their unit prior to launch or we're talking AUS dollars or something, anyone who paid that much needs to put down the pipe.

    12. Re:2 thoughts by StocDred · · Score: 1
      Once again, another ass who reads the posting and then instead on actually commenting on the article, decides to post a meaningless opinion turning it into an irrelevant Consoles Vs. PC argument.

      Plus you reveals you're an idiot about console pricing. You're a credit to slashdot.

    13. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you forgotten what they were selling for on eBay?

    14. Re:2 thoughts by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      My god man, after playing vice city on my 3-year-old computer, I don't think I could ever stand the loading times on a PS2. Sure, the computer takes longer to turn on, but if its already booted up, getting to a playable screen in VC takes less than 30 seconds. A PS2 takes forever to load GTA!

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    15. Re:2 thoughts by Boing · · Score: 1
      RPGs and FPSs are usually best in the realm of the PC.

      All of the Final Fantasy games have been based primarily on a console. See also: Chrono Trigger/Cross, .hack, Dragon Warrior... in fact, pretty much every RPG.

      Were you thinking of RTS (Warcraft, Starcraft, Command and Conquer, etc)?

    16. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      KOTOR is of course the exception, but that is also a console RPG (Xbox) :)

      It might be an exception in the sense that it is a good game. But it still is buggy as hell. Something that really should not happen in a console game. I was pretty pissed when I encountered a possible variety of the galaxy droid bug halfway through the ending cinematics.

    17. Re:2 thoughts by Ark42 · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Somebody invited me to this 8player XBOX Halo party. It was horrible. Besides the fact I had never seen an XBOX before, my assumptions were all proved right. I played for about 30 minutes trying very hard to get used to those silly thumb pad things for rotation, but it just doesn't work. Even though I use a mouse for all PC games, I would even prefer a trackball over these weird thumb pad things on the XBOX. I seriously bet I could learn to use a trackball a lot better then the thing they come with.
      That isn't even mentioning the fact that the graphics sucked compared to games I'm used to (like RTCW:ET), the 4player split screen thing was like using a 9" monitor. 8players is a LOT? I seriously dont understand what these people (friends of friends) were thinking. 64 players is a lot. 24-32 is decent. 8? what ever, 8 means 4v4 which is below the minimum for a fun game really. Don't forget the lack of buttons for binding more actions then there are buttons. When playing RTCW:ET Every single one of my keyboard buttons does something. Granted most of them are quickchat binds, still a lot of other keys are actions, guns, movement, etc.
      To sum it all up, I would never even bother to get an XBOX, even if somebody gave it to me for free. The gaming experience for me just plain sucks compared to PCs. I doubt PS2 or GameCube are any different.

    18. Re:2 thoughts by queen+of+everything · · Score: 1

      I bought my ps2 I dunno, 3 years ago for $300. Sure its a lot of money compared to buying one for $99 now. But I've had 3 years of playing cool games and I don't feel screwed. Being leet always costs a little more...

      --
      "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
    19. Re:2 thoughts by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      You, uh, do realize that there are other types of games than FPS right? I mean, I love keyboard and mousing FPS till the cows come home and I can shoot at them, but I can't really imagine playing Soul Caliber 2 on a PC. Would I really want to sit next to him trying to both use a keyboard to execute combos on a 17" screen?

      How about this: the best tool for the job. Console games on consoles and computer games on computers?

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    20. Re:2 thoughts by koreth · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it's so much more fun to twiddle my thumbs waiting for a multi-CD install to finish, hunt down the latest patch because the game shipped buggy (oops! they haven't fixed that bug yet, better wait for the next patch Real Soon Now), and get five minutes into it before it freezes because it needs a newer version of the video card driver I just updated a month ago.

      Consoles have their benefits.

      And I paid US$300 to get my PS2 on release day. Are you maybe talking Canadian or Australian dollars? Not sure what its launch price was in other countries.

    21. Re:2 thoughts by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Not even close. No console RPG can touch PC RPGs like Ultimas 3-7, Baldur's Gate, BG II, Neverwinter Nights, Planescape: Torment, Fallout, Fallout 2, the AD&D Gold Box games, etc, etc, etc. When you were playing some simplistic faux-RPG on your NES, I was playing Ultima V and VI, the Bard's Tale series, the Might & Magic series, and more. Those were role-playing games.

      Console RPGs are linear, constricting, and just plain boring. There's no sense of exploration, so sense of being enveloped in a living world, and no reward for doing the unexpected. It's like watching an interactive movie. Japanese-style (which is what we're really talking about, here) RPGs are terrible.

      Of course, that's my opinion.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    22. Re:2 thoughts by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >If you've tried a controller for more than a minute and found that it truly is uncomfortable, fine.

      Actually, I've tried to do a FPS with a controller, and even a minute is not enough. You just don't develop the thumb-muscles to use it efficently/painlessly if you are used to mouse/keyboard.

      Keyboard mouse - use all 8 fingers. One thumb for space-bar
      Controller - Both thumbs for multiple sets of controls. 4/2 fingers for the trigger buttons on the end.

      Big physical difference.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    23. Re:2 thoughts by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      It's not like those people are just receiving delivery on their PS2s today.

      I actually received my delivery yesterday. The sega ages games were the first that interested me enough to buy the system, especially with the price of modding.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    24. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandparent probably meant MMORPGs and D&D Forgotten Realms games, which do tend to hit PCs first and use more than 16 bound keys.

    25. Re:2 thoughts by yerricde · · Score: 1

      A PS2 takes forever to load GTA!

      If your PS2 takes a long time to load Grand Theft Auto, a PS1 game, try turning on fast PS1 CD access in the PS2's config screens.

      Oh, you meant GTA 3 and Vice City. Unlike PlayStation 2 games in the high-profile series, well-made GameCube games are specially designed to load quickly, streaming level content and using tracked music instead of loading all level content first and streaming background music. One hardly notices loading time in Super Smash Bros. Melee.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    26. Re:2 thoughts by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I love the whole exploration feel of American rpgs, and I also love the story and character development of Japanese games. I quickly tire of most games that don't have at least some mix of either. The big problem is that American publisher's don't like the time investment that comes from a Baldur's Gate, and for some reason the American branchs of Japanese companies seldom release somewhat non-linier rpgs. There's a lot in Japan, but they seldom make it over here. But most people seem to like the non linarity anyway. Something I found somewhat disapointing recently was the remake of phantasy star 1. Exploration was one of the best parts of the original, as you explored the inhabited planets of the system. Now they've locked the player into a set path by needing keys or events to unlock some portions.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    27. Re:2 thoughts by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Are you maybe talking Canadian or Australian dollars?

      More like eBay dollars during the initial shortage. Remember the Tickle Me Elmo and Furby launches? The PS2's USA launch was the same way, with prices inflating well over $500 during the height of the shortage.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    28. Re:2 thoughts by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Amen to the issue of a mouse. I tried playing 007:AUF on my Xbox and found that trying to play a FPS with a controller is pure frustration when I could use the mouse and click on their face in a tiny fraction of a second. However there are tons of people who just love Halo on Xbox to pieces, so there's obviously a huge market, and you and I are apparently in the minority.

      Apple needs large profit margins because they sell few units. For Sony, large profit margins are just icing. I don't know anyone who paid more than $299 for their PS2 though, and those who did got what they paid for - early distribution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:2 thoughts by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      I agree. The thing I hate the most about Japanese RPGs is that you can't go anywhere until the game wants you to. For example, I bought the PC version of Summoner (a port of a console RPG) hoping it would be fun. Then I discovered that I could walk anywhere on the overworld map I wanted, but I couldn't actually enter any location until someone in the game told me that those locations existed. In other words, I go to the place on the map where a huge city is located, but until some shmuck in another city tells me it's there, I can't see it.

      Granted, games like BG2 occasionally so something similar, but for the most part this is not a problem with PC RPGs.

      I like games where I can do what I want, go where I want, and not have to worry about sticking to the plot if I choose not to. In most console RPGs, if you eschew the plot, there's nothing left to do. However, I guess I can understand why most console gamers would find that appealing- non-linear games take more time and comittment, and the demographic which console games appear targetted to doesn't seem to have much of an attention span.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    30. Re:2 thoughts by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Even if he has forgetten that, I think the "put down the pipe" comment still applies.

      "Look! I can play Fantavision and it only cost me $500 on eBay! Woot!"

    31. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANK YOU! You hit the nail right on the head. There are no console RPGs that are as involving as the ones you mentioned. Those are all true classics in every sense of the word (even though I didn't like Baldur's due to the real-time element).

      The fighting engines in console RPGs are just atrocious too. You generally get a list of options like "attack, run, cast spell". No positioning of characters, no terrain advantages, and no pitting of enemies against each other based on the previous two details.

      And don't get me started on the console save-game setup..

    32. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like you feel really screwed for buying that $1600 286 back in the day?

    33. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nono, the RPGs are still best in the PC realm. Play one final fantasy and you've played them all. Hell, the quest doesn't even change! Only the graphics and the names of the spells/characters/monsters.

    34. Re:2 thoughts by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Folks who bought a PS2 at $499 must really feel screwed now

      Probably not. A lot of design faults appeared to be present in the old PS2. New ones take care of these. Also, the laser unit was known to die prematurely, so this is a cheap "consumer self repair".

      >And they say Apple has large profit margins !

      Yes and no... the newer PS2s have gone through a LOT of cost reduction redesign. Often that spells bad things for the consumer, but not in the PS2s case. The PS2 has become a much better built machine over time. For $99 you will get a unit that should last you longer.

      I would guess the original PS2 probably cost about $399 off the assembly line.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    35. Re:2 thoughts by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      What about me, though? I got my PS2 last month (9/26 according to my reciept) at $180 and I can tell you right now I'm feeling very screwed at the moment. $99 is damn near half of what I paid.

      Sure, I still have the receipt, but I'm willing to bet I could hold my breath until I turn blue in the face until I see any sort of refund from EB.

    36. Re:2 thoughts by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      8? what ever, 8 means 4v4 which is below the minimum for a fun game really.

      Really? Damn. I guess I must not have been having fun in all those 2, 3, and 4-player Doom deathmatches back in the day. And to think, all these 22 years I've been playing, I didn't even realize that you needed > 8 people to have fun at a video game...

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    37. Re:2 thoughts by Spleener12 · · Score: 1
      Each type of system(console/PC) is strong at different types of games. RPGs and FPSs are usually best in the realm of the PC. Sports games on the other hand, I always find to be much more playable on a console. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

      Exactly. I can't imagine playing Starcraft without a mouse (Starcraft 64), and I also can't imagine playing the PC version of Metal Gear Solid 2 on a keyboard (or on anything other than my Playstation controller hooked up to a USB adaptor, for that matter.) You can't imagine playing any games with a controller because the only games you've played are designed around a keyboard/mouse combo.

    38. Re:2 thoughts by troutsoup · · Score: 1

      i'm still bitter about my 100$ amd 386dx purchase! anyhow technology drops prices all the time. we bought ours at 299$ (for the sole purpose of playing GTA3).... about a week later it dropped to 199. i was livid. a bitch email to sony got me an 800 # to call and a free game from sony. the selection was thin, i picked the one i thought i'd like but it was iffy. the girlfriend liked it tho. so its not all bad.

      --
      -- troutsoup.com
    39. Re:2 thoughts by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      now my DVD burner is having a field day with Xbox software

      Halo aside, are there any XBox games worth using up a perfectly good blank CD? Not being much of a gamer, I've only tried a few, but the ones I tried were just awful.

    40. Re:2 thoughts by FannyMinstrel · · Score: 2, Funny
    41. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, let's hope they don't drop the price because that way you'll be much better off. Okay, you have exactly the same machine either way and are out of pocket by exactly the same amount either way but... ah... I forget what the point was. Anyway, let's hope they double the price, then you'll have made a profit!

    42. Re:2 thoughts by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      The point is that, because I didn't wait fifteen days, I'm out $80.00. If this is how Sony wants to treat their installed customer base, I'll be damed if I'll drop currency on the PSP or the PlayStation 3 until they too drop under $100.

      Anybody besides me having Sega Saturn flashbacks?

    43. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All of the Final Fantasy games have been based primarily on a console. See also: Chrono Trigger/Cross, .hack, Dragon Warrior...
      Which are terrible and made mainly for preschoolers. Thanks for proving his point.
      in fact, pretty much every RPG.
      Holy crap. Seriously, how old are you?
    44. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yes, I'm outraged also.

      No company should EVER lower prices on their products, they'll just wind up pissing off the customers who have one already.

      And while we're at it, copyright extensions should be retroactive because it's unfair to the guy who registers his work tomorrow, as opposed to the guy who registered yesterday.

      So in short: Change is evil.

    45. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $499? Stop smoking crack, it came out at $299.

    46. Re:2 thoughts by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. Why don't you just return the thing and buy it again in another week? You've only had it for two weeks, you probably get a month on the return policy.

    47. Re:2 thoughts by hamster+foo · · Score: 1

      "If this is how Sony wants to treat their installed customer base"

      How is Sony lowering prices having any negative effect on their installed user base? What you you prefer that they raise prices to show loyalty to their installed customer base?

      It's kind of silly to get upset about a price cut. If they had purposely mislead you or somehow cheated you out of your money then I could see you having some resentment over it, but they're just lowering prices in response to their competition which is a good thing.

      --
      - b
    48. Re:2 thoughts by truesaer · · Score: 1

      I bought my PS2 for $299 two weeks before the price dropped to $199. Personally, it would annoy me if I didn't intentionally avoid thinking about it!

    49. Re:2 thoughts by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      1. Today is day 16. EB won't accept returns after 14 days.
      2. According to the fine print on the back of the receipt, EB's return policy on hardware is like their return policy on software: If the package has been opened, it's exchange-only.
    50. Re:2 thoughts by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "but they're just lowering prices in response to their competition which is a good thing."

      My problem isn't with the fact they're cutting prices, it's the degree of the price cut. Gradual reductions in price are expected as the console goes through it's natural life cycle (better manufacturing techniques, economies of scale kicking in, etc.). My issue is that they're slashing the price in half, which leaves me wondering "If it's only worth half of what you charged a week ago, why didn't you drop the price earlier?" They didn't see fit to pass their savings onto their customers earlier? Heck, a lot of the PS2s that will be sold for that price probably came over to North America in the same container as mine.

      Cutting prices in the face of competition is a good thing, but keeping prices artificially inflated until your competitors all but twist your arm to make you drop your prices shows a general disreguard for customers.

    51. Re:2 thoughts by hamster+foo · · Score: 1

      "If it's only worth half of what you charged a week ago, why didn't you drop the price earlier?"

      What the PS2 and most products are worth is largely based on what the market will bare. Sony's business depends on them trying to find an optimum price point for their products. This is tempered somewhat by their cost of manufacturing, R&D, etc. They could sell their products at rock bottom prices that just cover their expenses with a little profit on the side, but from their perspective and a general business perspective it just makes sense to try to find that optimum price point. If you can sell widgets to 100 people for $5 or 90 widgets to people at $20, which price point are you going to choose to sell your widgets at?

      Sony is the market leader in console sales by a large margin from most of the figures I've seen, so they really had no good incentive to lower their prices. Nintendo lowering their console prices and then exceeding Sony sales gives Sony that incentive.

      I'm honestly not even sure what you would consider artificially inflated. I doubt you bought the console thinking that the manufacturing costs were even in the same ballpark as the price you were paying. From the sounds of it, you wouldn't have been bothered if Sony had gradually reduced the price of the PS2, which would have had the effect of keeping it at a higher profit margin longer. That wouldn't exactly be consumer friendly either.
      Sony isn't trying to bilk their current customers here, they are trying to maintain their sales.

      Like you, I'd LOVE for things to be based on what the materials and such were worth, but most things on the shelves are not based on that and will never be based on that. It's not a matter of a disregard for customers; it's a matter of business.

      --
      - b
    52. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cutting prices in the face of competition is a good thing, but keeping prices artificially inflated until your competitors all but twist your arm to make you drop your prices shows a general disreguard for customers.
      You have to understand that consoles are not in a competitive comodity market, where goods are sold at marginal costs. The market is an oligopoly, where all prices between marginal costs and monopoly prices are possible, depending on how the players (Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft) react to each others actions.
    53. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be damed if I'll drop currency on the PSP or the PlayStation 3 until they too drop under $100.

      That's your choice. Just don't whine about not having the latest system while you're waiting for the console to drop below $100. The tradeoff to buying any technology early is you'll pay more BUT you'll have cooler technolgy earlier.

      I'm assuming you're not against price drops entirely, so what would you have Sony do? Drop the price a dollar per day so your "screwing" is more gradual?

    54. Re:2 thoughts by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Just don't whine about not having the latest system while you're waiting for the console to drop below $100. The tradeoff to buying any technology early is you'll pay more BUT you'll have cooler technolgy earlier."

      If I were going to whine about not having "the latest and greatest," don't you think I would have bought a PS2 a little sooner than two weeks ago? I'd probably have a better 3D board on my computer while I was at it...

      I don't buy "the latest and greatest system," I wait until there are games that I feel justify the purchase of the hardware before I consider buying it. And then I like to get my money's worth (not half of it).

      "I'm assuming you're not against price drops entirely, so what would you have Sony do?"

      To be more proactive about price cuts instead of waiting for someone else to act first. All of Sony's price cuts suggest they care more about Nintendo than they do about their own customers.

    55. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, Im still trying to get a refund on my pentium 75 that cost me 1500 bucks.

      Damn Commies.

  4. Microsoft's going to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Rolling out PCs^H^H^Hgame consoles and selling them for several hundred $ below cost

    1. Re:Microsoft's going to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you smell Patent infringement in the air?

      Microsoft probably allready patented the process
      of selling consoles at a loss so these guys better watch out!

  5. PS2 and the need for one. by DS-1107 · · Score: 1
    I might know a few that might by themselves a 2nd PS2 if this comes out - but I do wonder how many people out there are thinking about buying one compared with how many people was thinking of buying a GCN.

    - and some information on how much a PS2, a GCN and a X-box costs to produce would be intresting.

    ...and too bad I bought myself a new PS2 a month ago.

    1. Re:PS2 and the need for one. by mesach · · Score: 1

      for $99 i'll buy both, maybe pick up a second ps2 for a linux box.

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:PS2 and the need for one. by Wog · · Score: 1

      Why a PS2?

      My XBox has a 10 gig hard drive, I bought it with a bad DVD drive, modded it, and installed linux over the network port. Total cost = $80 for a 700 MHz...

      With that PS2, you'll need a hard drive and network adapter.

    3. Re:PS2 and the need for one. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Where'd you get an XBox for $80 minus the cost of the mod?
      Or was that total cost actually Enron math?

    4. Re:PS2 and the need for one. by Wog · · Score: 1

      Working at a used video game store that doesn't do repairs helped.

      Later, I bought two more boxes with bad DVD drives and put the software hacks on there for, oh, about $30 apiece. I only wish I could keep that opportunity now. They're great little computers for less than half a day's work. :-)

  6. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...no?

    Look, dropping the PS2 to $99 would probably cause Sony to make almost nothing on the hardware, if they aren't losing money at that point. There's also no need to jump down to the Game Cube's level, as they'll still outsell both Nintendo and Microsoft, even at a higher price. Hell, the number of people who have to rebuy a PS2 to replace a dead one probably outnumbers the number of people who picked up a GCN at its new low price.

    Besides, the new wave of consoles are coming in 2005 or 2006...do you honestly think Sony will keep it at $99 or less for 2 or 3 YEARS before their new system?

    In other words...no.

    1. Re:Um... by Mephie · · Score: 1
      That's true, but the PS2 is getting some heavy competition now. They're releasing their "new version" of the PS2, the.. PSX, I think? Plus, the GC is now dirt cheap, X-BOX has many great games coming out in the near future, some of which, including Halo 2, are for X-BOX only; and to top it all off, GTA3 and GTA:VC which themselves probably sold a crapload of PS2s, is being released for X-BOX in time for the holidays.
      Damn that was a long sentence...

      Anyway, heck, I almost bought a PS2 for those GTA games, but now I won't have to cos I can get it for my X-BOX. If they drop to $99 though, I may still buy one.

      All things considered, this may not be as unlikely as you may think.

    2. Re:Um... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Look, dropping the PS2 to $99 would probably cause Sony to make almost nothing on the hardware, if they aren't losing money at that point.

      Do you have a link which shows detail on Sonys cost of goods sold? By this point I bet that Sonys cost to make a single PS2 is much lower than people think.

    3. Re:Um... by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Um, no they aren't outselling the GCN. From IGN, and the reason Sony is dropping the price: "On September 25th, Nintendo decided to drop the GameCube's price once again -- from $149 to $99. While many gauged this as a final act of desperation, the new purchase price has had the desired affect.

      Within the first few days of the announcement, some retailers were selling as many as 70 GameCubes a day (although sales appear to be declining). Last week's sales data shows that the GameCube outsold the Playstation 2 by 20% and the Xbox by 145%."

      Plus the PS2 looks like ass in a bag.

    4. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was fairly well understood though that the hardware costs are not the issue. It's all about market penetration for both Sony, MS and perhaps even Nintendo (OK, can't see it myself). The development and manufacturing costs of games (for modestly successful titles - we shall ignore Starsky and Hutch for now) are very small compared to the retail amounts pulled in.

      Why would MS favour XBox vs PC games? Easy, they get royalties on EVERY XBox title. They get nothing at all on a PC Game. The hardware is the equivalent of the Gillette razor. It's a los leader that makes you buy something far more over-priced later in the day...

      So MS, Sony et al will always make a loss on the console. The question for them is how much before the future benefits (a hybrid PC, PSX, emm, Panasonic thingy, ok, perhaps not) start to mangle the business plan. None of this is about short termism where Sony and MS are concerned. It's all about owning your living rooms.

      Anyone else noticed the shiny new silver PS2s kicking around? Batch pad fodder if ever there was some. Almost made me regret buying the ugly Borg XBox last month. But I put a brown bag over it's head to hide my shame...

      (Now if only they'd brought out SuperGaldelicHour for the XBox...)

    5. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dropping the PS2 to $99 would probably cause Sony to make almost nothing on the hardware

      The thing is that Sony, unlike Microsoft, is in that sweet spot where they can afford to not make money on the individual consoles becuase they are actually making money on the game licenses at this point. Do you have any idea how many PS2 games sell? As long as Sony isn't actively losing money per PS2, they could probably afford to do this quite comfortably, especially if they are anticipating the point the PS3 is released and the price can rise again, even if that point is 2-3 years away.

      Look at it this way, anyway: The PS2 has so much market penetration at this point that they're probably not THAT far from the point where everyone who was ever thinking about buying a PS2 has one. At that point, their sales start lagging to the point where dropping profit-per-console could mean more profit overall..

    6. Re:Um... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      So MS, Sony et al will always make a loss on the console.

      Didn't Nintendo come out not to long ago and say that they have never taken a loss on what they sold the consoles for? I'm sure they make a majority of the money on licensing et al. The Xbox is a diffent beast though, since MS has been selling it at a loss when Nvidia wouldn't help cover some of the costs.

    7. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, one week's worth of sales data compared to two years worth of previous sales, and it's already slowing down.. Yep, nintendo's really hauling ass there...

    8. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus the PS2 looks like ass in a bag

      Over at Evil Avatar folks refer to the gamecube as a "purple purse".

    9. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would just like to jump in and say that Evil Avatar posters are the biggest morons in the entire gaming community. Even Gaming-Age folks (with a median age of six) are preferable to those insufferable fruits.

    10. Re:Um... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      But actually, with a pricetag of roughly us$700, the higher the cost of a barebones PS2, the better. Why? Well when you add up the total cost of a PS2, hard drive, PVR, etc. to see whether the PSX is going to be worth it, the higher the cost of the respective components, the better deal the PSX seems to be. It would behoove Sony to hold out on the price drop until the PSX has been out a few months, just for those people in the middle range that would buy a PSX if the PS2 still costs $180, but just get a PS2+Tivo if the PS2 costs $99.

  7. 90nm != cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sony is ready to roll the manufacturing plants for their smaller 90 nanometer PS2 CPU. Maybe that price drop isn't so unbelievable after all..."

    Not sure that makes a whole lot of sense, considering that the cost to run a 90nm process is quite expensive. The smaller processes like that get much more expensive, and I can see little reason (other than experience, maybe) for Sony to change the process on a chip whose specs are not going to be changed, either. Unless, of course, they plan on using it in another product.

    1. Re:90nm != cheap by jpmoney · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a smaller chip means more can fit on a waifer and therefore you can get more bang for your yen. At this point they've made so many PS2 CPUs that their yields have to be huge, so getting more out at one time and in the same process can make it cheaper.

      --
      unf.
    2. Re:90nm != cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90nm does = higher yield, more working chips per run, so though the process is more expensive, the results (higher yield) makes it cheaper.

    3. Re:90nm != cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the correct answer is maybe so maybe no. We'd need to know a lot of details to say so either way and it doesn't look like anybody is discussing those details in this forum.
      More die per wafer is one thing, but mask costs are another. In the past, their fab partner has been Toshiba and we know they're talking about having IBM join in for the next gen processor. However, the details are fuzzy. Japanese chip concerns with in-house fabs aren't as open as Taiwan foundries about their technology such as mask costs.
      I don't think we can say for sure that they're getting cheaper chips at 90nm, and it has been well publicized that mask costs are a serious problem for smaller fabless companies.

    4. Re:90nm != cheap by doormat · · Score: 1

      Sony has changed the process once already on the PS2. Initally, when the PS2 orignally came out it was built on the 180nm fabrication process. Then it switched over to 130nm, and now 90nm. The whole goal is to reduce the number of discrete chips in the PS2. Same functions, fewer chips. Remember there is an entire PS1 is on one chip in the PS2. Fewer chips = cheaper (per unit) to produce.

      Plus with the PSX coming out soon, the fewer chips that take care of the PS2 functions, the more room on the PCB for the other functions, like TV Tuner hardware, stuff to control the DVD-R, etc.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  8. Why should they lower the price? by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

    Sales of the GCN are just a blip for the moment. There are lots of people who already have a PS2 or XBOX who are interested in the GCN simply because it has some really nice games. I know, I have a GCN that I bought just for Rogue Squadron II. However, as the PS2 is still the most popular system with the greatest selection of games it makes no sense to drop the price yet.

    Now the XBOX is a different case entirely, it really needs to be cheaper.

    I suspect Sony will keep the price where it is in the run up to Christmas and then drop it early next year.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:Why should they lower the price? by JohnLi · · Score: 1

      I lost my PS2 to theft about 4 months ago. I have wanted to replace it, but i dont want to spend the 300 it would take to do so. The console is 180, but an extra controller, mem card, game.. gets to almost 300 pretty easily. I am just waiting for the price drop to re-buy. I wont buy a gamecube, but if the xbox were 99 dollars, i would scoop it up too.

      --
      The / in /. would be more accurate if it leaned to the left. http://www.metricnut.com
    2. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Why not buy a GameCube? You're missing out on some truly excellent games, more than you'd get with the X-Box (not that it doesn't have some great games, too.) The GC is cheap, and some of the best games are under $30 now. Do yourself a favor and get one. Unless you've been duped by that whole "Nintendo is a kiddy console" line of BS.

      Buy a GameCube, then buy:
      Metroid Prime
      Legend of Zelda: Windwaker
      Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem
      Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike

      Those four alone should make the Cube worth your while.

      Or don't buy one. See if I care! :)

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    3. Re:Why should they lower the price? by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

      " Sales of the GCN are just a blip for the moment. There are lots of people who already have a PS2 or XBOX who are interested in the GCN simply because it has some really nice games."

      Why the hell else would someone buy a game console? Because it matches thier curtains?

      END COMMUNICATION

    4. Re:Why should they lower the price? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All of those games still cost at least $35 used. Maybe when the best titles for the system come down in price a little, GC sales will increase still further. I have Rogue Squadron II, and a Game Boy Player, and that's it because all four or five other games I consider worth purchasing for GC are Nintendo-released titles and come with hefty price tags.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Nope. You can buy Eternal Darkness for as little as $14.99 new. And Metroid Prime can be had for free with the purchase of a new Cube. Otherwise, you can buy it new for $29.99.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    6. Re:Why should they lower the price? by JohnLi · · Score: 1

      I like the dvd functionality. I like GTA, EA Sports(fifa in particular), and easy network ability. PS2's got that. GC falls short imo.

      Not that i dislike nintento, or the gamecube, but i wasn't about to switch when i had a ps2.

      Anyway, my whole point was to reply to the question asking why they should lower the price. I think that there are a great deal of people like me who have lost their ps2 for one reason or another and would like one back....but dont want to pay 300 dollars for a replacement.

      sorry, got lazy w/ capitalization there at the end. No grammar stamina :)

      --
      The / in /. would be more accurate if it leaned to the left. http://www.metricnut.com
    7. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      I suppose I understand. Personally, I have a stand-alone DVD player (as well as one in my computer) and I dislike sports games. I also never play networked games, as I prefer playing video games alone. When others around, I can usually find better things to do.

      Plus I love Metroid and Zelda, so the Cube was a no-brainer.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    8. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first 3 games are greatest hits ($20-$30 new), even if you can't find them as greatest hits blockbusters are selling them mega cheap

    9. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Fifa Soccer 2003 sitting right next to me, and it says gamecube on it...

    10. Re:Why should they lower the price? by fastgood · · Score: 1

      Why the hell else would someone buy a game console? Because it matches thier curtains?

      I would buy a GameCube because the games must be so much cheaper than disc-based.
      Software publishers are always saying how piracy leads to much more expensive products for the rest of us.

    11. Re:Why should they lower the price? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I think you're shopping at the wrong place(s).

      The EB near where I work had two copies of Eternal Darkness for $14.99 when I went in to pre-order the new Legacy of Kain game, and I just bought an unused copy of Rogue Leader on eBay for about the same price.

      Obviously newly-released games are still going to cost a lot, but that's a given on any platform.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    12. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disc-based? What exactly do you think comes in those Metroid Prime packages?

    13. Re:Why should they lower the price? by Enucite · · Score: 1

      As others have said, Eternal Darkness $14.99 Gamestop. I just got it, and it's awesome.

      I recently got a GC because of the price drop, and I get free rentals at one of the video stores in town, so I figured it'd be worth the $99.

      Keeping in mind that I get free rentals, I now own more games for GC than I do for Xbox and PS2 combined. There's so many games so good I want to be able to pop in and play whenever I want without having to run down to the store. And there are even more games that I'm wanting to buy, but I'm forcing myself to wait and finish what I've got!

      As far as the price, look into used games a lot of the time you can get some great games for less than $20. There's also many games you can get new for very low prices: Check here

      And while I'm talking about GC, I don't know how people get off saying it's a "kiddy console". There may be more games for kids on GC than on Xbox or PS2, but that's only because there are no kids games for those two consoles. Hell, I'm 22 and I've found far more games I enjoy on GC than I have on Xbox and PS2 combined.

  9. XBOX will be lonley by DarkHazard · · Score: 1

    If the PS2's price drops, then xbox will be the only expensive console making xbox the apple (even though it's made by microsoft) of video game systems. that would probably hurt sales alot...

    1. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      It's likely that Microsoft will drop the Xbox price to match the PS2.

      Aside from M$ hating, I couldn't imagine buying a PS2 instead of an Xbox. The graphics on the Xbox are superior. This would be different if the PS2 has FSAA and a HDD.

      I'm not being a zealot here, I own both systems and I only turn my PS2 on to play DBZ: Bodukai anymore. All other titles, I wait for the Xbox release in hopes of graphical enhancements.

      With a little customization to your Xbox, you can slap a 120 gig HDD in it and run your games off it for much greater load speeds. You can also store Divx movies, mp3's, etc and play them back with XBMP. There's lots of home-brew software for the Xbox and it's all relatively easy to install and use, given the fact it has a HDD and network port.

      I'm a big fan of streaming audio, so having an Xbox connected via optical cables to the home stereo, playing a streaming music feed is a common senario for mine. Makes me wonder why people buy PS2's at all, these days.. :)

      PS - Yeah, you can run Linux on either. Who cares. I'm more than happy using Linux on my desktop and letting the console run it's native OS.

    2. Re:XBOX will be lonley by phunhippy · · Score: 1

      have you ever used an xbox controller?

      they're junk... i hate playing fighting games with them and most other games..

      I own all 3 consoles... i haven't fired up my xbox in months...

      last game i bought was SCII....for PS2.. sure graphics are a little prettier on xbox.. but so what... the controls are better on the pS2.. that means a hundred times more to me and other gamers..

      Also lets consider online play... i bought madden.. guess what.. its only on PS2.. and its free and i don't have to pay 60 box to microsoft to play games online.. and i won't pay them that money ever.

      long live PS2...

    3. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the PS2's price drops, then xbox will be the only expensive console making xbox the apple (even though it's made by microsoft) of video game systems. that would probably hurt sales alot...

      "a lot" is two words, not one. Had to point that out. kthxbye

    4. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Fervent · · Score: 1

      The Controller S is near identical to the PS2. Actually, I find it a little more comfortable.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    5. Re:XBOX will be lonley by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      if anything the gamecube is the apple of the three systems. far superior graphics, better industrial design, smaller numbers overall.

      the only thing that doesnt fit is the price.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    6. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      And can't you buy an adaptor to allow you to use a PS2 controller on an XBox? Although I might be getting confused with something else...

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    7. Re:XBOX will be lonley by hpavc · · Score: 1

      the s-controller is very hard for small hands ... especially for kids. this is a popular complaint.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    8. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1


      Yeah, I do like the PS2 controllers better too.

      Still, tho, I can't deal with those jaggies on a big screen. If the PS2 had FSAA and component video output (at least 720p resolution, native), then things would be different.

    9. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Well, technically the X-Box has slightly better graphics capability than the Cube, though not every game makes use of it. But otherwise, you're right on. Of course, GameCube games tend to be more fun to play, but...

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    10. Re:XBOX will be lonley by phunhippy · · Score: 1

      right because what 10 games support 720p?

      My tv doesn't.. so ps2 is fine for me till next gen consoles... plus the games are better

    11. Re:XBOX will be lonley by xjerky · · Score: 1

      Yep, here's the one I have from lik-sang :

      link

      Works like a charm, and lets you use Saturn and Dreamcast controllers to boot! I use the Saturn controller for SC2, and I never looked back! :)

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    12. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      capability does not imply actuality

    13. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      In this case, it does. But it's no big deal. All the graphics flash in the world can't make games more fun.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    14. Re:XBOX will be lonley by Spleener12 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I always thought of Nintendo as the Apple of the console industry ever since they released that line of N64s that came in iMac colors.

  10. Erm, small error here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...Playstation 2 listed at $99...
    Eh? How does this tell us anything about the GameCube's price?
    1. Re:Erm, small error here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't, but it does tell us that you're a stupid twatwaffle.

  11. Not gonna help... by NineNine · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People don't buy PS2's or Gamecubes because of price, primarily. They're geared at completely different markets. The Gamecube is the 2-16 year old market. The PS2 is an older market. It's all about the games. I wouldn't care if the Gamecube was $5. I would never buy one because the game selection is primarily for little kids (Mario, anime, silly Japanese shit, etc.). People who want a PS2 will buy a PS2.

    1. Re:Not gonna help... by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

      While the gamecube has a kiddy reputation, I don't think Rogue Squadrons II and III, F-zero, Viewtiful Joe, and Metroid Prime are kiddy games. Nothing competes with Viewtiful Joe in the beat em up department these days. Nothing. I'm buying a gamecube just for that.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    2. Re:Not gonna help... by FroBugg · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Because no self-respecting adult wants to play a game that doesn't have lots of blood, hookers, drugs, and gratuitous violence.

    3. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like someone that has never played on a Cube. Metroid Prime is excellent. Zelda WW may have the cell shaded graphics but it is a great game. Fzero is probably the most difficult racing game I have ever played. Viewtiful Joe is awesome. Mario SS is a great platformer no matter what it looks like. Yes there are some games targeted towards younger audienced, but the GameCube has some really nice exclusive games that make it worth the purchase. Especially at $99.

    4. Re:Not gonna help... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Geek Girls Naked! [ccbill.com]

      uhh...have you got a password for that? :P

    5. Re:Not gonna help... by BobTheJanitor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but for geeks that are living almost hand-to-mouth, that $100 price differential might make all the difference.
      My roommate has a PS2 and keeps it in the living room, so I wouldn't spend $200 on a redundant system. I would, however, consider paying $99 simply for the fact that he and I aren't planning on living together forever. It would be nice if I could still play the few PS2 games that I own once I no longer have access to his machine.

    6. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. My brother has wanted a PS2 since they first became available, at $99, he might be able to afford one. I myself, have considered getting a PS2 myself for awhile, but could never justify the $200 price, plus the cost of games. At $99, I will buy one.

      I'm sure there are alot of people in both my brother's and my situation. The price drop will definitely have an effect on salse.

    7. Re:Not gonna help... by aliens · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really have been brainwashed. You know no one will think less of you for having a gamecube. In fact your friends will probably thank you.

      The cube has the best selection of 'party' (4 player) games available. I guess you can't enjoy these titles though since they're on a kiddie system.

      Also, not everyone has $200+ to throw around for a system, memory card and game. $100 is still a lot of money to a lot of people these days.

      So people do buy PS2's or Gamecubes because of price.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    8. Re:Not gonna help... by mj_1903 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course Resident Evil 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, Metroid Prime, Eternal Darkness, F-Zero, Zelda, Soul Calibur etc. are not for adults are they?

      I know the gamecube has a reputation for being a kiddie system, but it simply is not the case. I can remember clearly at launch and for the several months afterward that there were no 'kiddie' games. In fact, a quick look at the PS2 lineup will find hundreds of kiddie games, many of them worthless.

      If you still think its kiddie, go pick up Resident Evil 4 for GameCube (the new one coming out soon) and tell me you aint scared.

    9. Re:Not gonna help... by fondue · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Another loser passes up some of the best games of this generation thanks to their own insecurities.

      --

      Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

    10. Re:Not gonna help... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this up as Insightful is an idiot as there are many games for gamecube that are not geared towards kids.

    11. Re:Not gonna help... by DietFluffy · · Score: 1

      parent should be modded troll/flamebait, though i'm not a fan myself, it's ridiculous to refer to Mario and anime as "silly japanese shit".

      a quick google search reveals that adults make up a full 40% of gamecube buyers compared to 60% for the console industry as a whole. that means that all 3 console manufacturers are targeting pretty much the same demographic; the current surge in sales of the gamecube will impact the sales of both the ps2 and the xbox.

    12. Re:Not gonna help... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      uhh...have you got a password for that? :P

      I only wish I did...

    13. Re:Not gonna help... by BortQ · · Score: 1
      People buy (or not) EVERYTHING because of price. Just look at the big sales increase GameCube got when they went to $99.

      If a PS2 was also $99 I bet they'd sell like gangbusters.

      --

      A Multiplayer Strategy Game for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux
    14. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if you're trying to troll or not, but either way, you've just won my weekly "most clueless 12-year-old posting on slashdot" award. Congratulations.

    15. Re:Not gonna help... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i can see how metroid prime and resident evil are kids games (NOT). don't let the pokemon stereotype fool you. there are plenty of rated M games for the gamecube.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    16. Re:Not gonna help... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      People buy (or not) EVERYTHING because of price

      If everybody bought everything because of price, Wal-Mart would be the only store left in the country. As is, I have a thriving high-end retail store as PROOF that not everything revolves around price. Some of us still care about quality...

    17. Re:Not gonna help... by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      Skip down to your local 12 year olds house (mind out for the allegations of paedophilia mind you) and see what games he's got (other genders are available...)

      Almost certainly he'll have a stack of 18 rated games (18 is the highest classification in the UK) including all the Resident Evils. And the game companies know this. I thought Ali G was the same until I saw a load of 12 year olds imitating his irritating hand snap thingy... Pfffft... Kids these days, huh? =)

    18. Re:Not gonna help... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      In a way, that is true, but what fraction of buyers is that? When you compare the dollar sales all the K-Marts, Targets and Wal-Marts to those of elite retailers, there is a significant imbalance.

      The hard part is convincing a lot of people that paying twice as much gets twice as much quality, and really, rarely does one get doubling of quality on doubling of price.

      As it is, the market for better products is much smaller than the stuff that is literally a commodity.

    19. Re:Not gonna help... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      An adult buyer !== an adult gamer. I'd wager that most 'adult buyers' of gamecubes are buying them for their kids. "Yay another mario game! Thanks daddy!"

    20. Re:Not gonna help... by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      bah... Nintendo has games that would challenge the mind of an adult.. hence the reason i have one... i'm almost 21 and yes.. i play Nintendo games... Eternal Darkness 10/10, Metroid Prime 10/10, hell, even mario golf is fun! just because the games look cartoony don't mean it's for kids...

    21. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I just want to play games that have more depth and complexity to them than "get coins, find princess" type shit. Complex games that make you think scare away younger folks and that's why they're rare on the gamecube.

      In fact, I don't particularily care for GTA3 either, but at least it's a lot more open-ended than the linear stuff you find in most GC games.

    22. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to playing with your dolls and lego, they're sitting right next to your gamecube.

    23. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! TWO whole non-kiddie games! Holy fuck! Break out the R rating on that console! Let's hide it from the youngins!

    24. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently capitalization and grammer have challenged your mind as well. Keep at it though, champ! Someday you'll get it!

      However, you've just tanked your argument about the games being intellectually challenging for an average adult.

    25. Re:Not gonna help... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "The Gamecube is the 2-16 year old market. The PS2 is an older market."

      <WONKA>

      Strike that. Reverse it.

      </WONKA>

    26. Re:Not gonna help... by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      So what's your example of a groundbreaking, deep, complex game that's not GTA?

    27. Re:Not gonna help... by Black+Hitler · · Score: 1

      WOW WHAT A SAVAGE BURN! How about a "yo momma" joke? And what's the deal with airline food? Dumbass.

    28. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS1 is selling for $50 on amazon and the games are $10-20 each. Rarely do I play Video Games and Games in general, but at that price it's going on my X-mas List.

    29. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nethack!

    30. Re:Not gonna help... by ndnet · · Score: 1

      The Gamecube is the 2-16 year old market.

      I would never buy one because the game selection is primarily for little kids (Mario, anime, silly Japanese shit, etc.).

      I'm sorry to hear that. You see, I just bought a gamecube at the new price point and have already picked up 2 games beside the included Mario Sunshine: Rogue Squadron 2 and Soul Caliber 2. SC2 has LINK on the GC. LINK! And I doubt my younger brothers would be very good at Rogue Leader.

      Then there are the games I plan on getting: Super Smash Brothers Melee, which looks kiddish but is actually addictive; Viewtiful Joe, which IMHO is the most original side scroller I've seen in years; Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles, which is no kiddie game; Rogue Squadron 3, see above; and a few more.

      Yes, there are *many* kiddie games. But I don't think the Metroid Prime, Lost Kingdoms 1 or 2, or P. N. 03 I drool over are even appropriate for kids. And what about Phantasy Star Online and 007?

      You need to look at the whole issue; I bought the GC because it was accessible to my younger brothers, had quite a few games I'll enjoy, and is at a good price point.

      I wouldn't care if the Gamecube was $5.

      If this is the case, you have SERIOUS issues. A $5 gamecube would make a great doorstop or paperweight at the very least, but if it had the hardware in it then there are fun games to be played.

      Besides, GC is pretty closed up, but I've heard some latent hackability is coming into play.

    31. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would imply that all people who were "kids" in the 80's havent aged at all to be kids now with current mario stuff.

      Tahts some fucked up shit, I bet they are actually reverse vampires.

    32. Re:Not gonna help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days most PS2 units sold are to replace a out of 90 day coverage PS2 that quit qorking (they sem to stop reading one kind of disc or another as fast as possible.
      Thats the only reason PS2 sales numbers aare so high.

  12. I don't get this story by Ianoo · · Score: 1

    Is the Nintendo GameCube or the Sony Playstation 2 going to be $99? Really badly written article. If the PS2 is going to be dropping to $99, why is Nintendo sharing space at the $99 rack? If the GC is dropping to $99, why are you talking about the PS2?

    1. Re:I don't get this story by JackPo · · Score: 0

      That's because you haven't been following /. GC is already at 99 dollars due to a previous price drop, now there is the possibility that PS2 will be coming down as well (hence sharing the rack).

    2. Re:I don't get this story by D'Sphitz · · Score: 0

      gamecube is already $99

    3. Re:I don't get this story by damiam · · Score: 1

      The GameCube is already $99, and has been for a week or two. The rumor is that the PS2 may soon also be $99.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:I don't get this story by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      True, I've been away from the computer for a week so probably missed it. Feel free to mod my parent down >:Z

    5. Re:I don't get this story by michrech · · Score: 1

      You don't get out much, do you.. The GC is already $99, so obviously the article is talkinga about the Play Station dropping in price.

      Hell, you don't even half to get out to know the GC is already at $99. They have plastered advertisements all over TV about it.. A really stupid ad at that...

      Try doing just a LITTLE research, just once in your life...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    6. Re:I don't get this story by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually I think you need to get out more. I've been away from the PC and the TV for the last 8 days... LMFAO, you accuse me of not getting out enough because I don't know the latest price of a particular games console.

    7. Re:I don't get this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do - so we don't have to read posters that can't be bothered to use google for 2 seconds...

    8. Re:I don't get this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get out much, do you..

      What a question !
      From somebody whose idea of getting out is going
      to an place where he can price-check gaming consoles.

  13. Only one thing can really be said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and that's I, for one, welcome our new Playstation overlords...

  14. Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as PS2 functionality Goes, it's almost as good as an X-Box. A box for $100 bucks that plays DVD's and some great Console games will surely outsell gamecube. A Gamecube can do one thing, play gamecube games. People want that Multi-Function crap if they're going to shell out for set top boxes.

    1. Re:Welp by duren686 · · Score: 1

      What'd be sweet is a price drop on the Panasonic Q. But first they'd have to release it in the North American market, probably.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    2. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A Gamecube can do one thing, play gamecube games."
      Wait, are you saying that a PS2 or X box can play games from other consoles?

  15. Cheap Linux Box by rf0 · · Score: 1

    PS2 + Linux Kit + USB Keyboard and mouse gives a socially acceptable Linux machine in the front room 300. Now thats something to smile about :)

    Rus

    1. Re:Cheap Linux Box by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's less socially acceptable, but wouldn't you have a much more powerful machine if you did the same to an X-Box? The only reason it isn't socially acceptable is because of stupid-ass laws like the DMCA. Besdies, $300 (180 in my money) can buy you a perfectly reasonable reconditioned second-hand machine, or, how about: Duron 1.3GHz 30.00 MS-6378 (KLE133 w/audio, video, LAN) 37.50 128MB PC133 19.50 ATX Midi Tower 28.00 Seagate U Series X 20 20GB UDMA100 40.00 Samsung SD-616 DVD-ROM 24.51 ...for a grand total of 179.51 ($287). I wonder whose machine will be faster...

    2. Re:Cheap Linux Box by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      Damned text formatting, let's try again:

      Duron 1.3GHz 30.00
      MS-6378 (KLE133 w/audio, video, LAN) 37.50
      128MB PC133 19.50
      ATX Midi Tower 28.00
      Seagate U Series X 20 20GB UDMA100 40.00
      Samsung SD-616 DVD-ROM 24.51

      = 179.51

    3. Re:Cheap Linux Box by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I should preface this by admitting I don't own one, but from everything I've heard, Linux running on the ps2 is extreamly slow.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:Cheap Linux Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would you need two usb keyboards? my ps2 linux kit came with one, along with a mouse :-P

    5. Re:Cheap Linux Box by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Linux on PS2 runs on only half of the EE, at 300MHz. It must be booted from the CD, and it cannot read the CD-ROM, which means you need an external USB or 1394 cdrom if you want to read discs. The cost of such a system is $300, as you note.

      Linux on Xbox utilizes all of the processor, at 733 MHz or whatever it is. It can be booted at least from the hard drive and maybe from the CD with the right BIOS. It can read the CDROM drive, which as we all know is just a normal ATAPI DVD-ROM, but which you could probably replace with a combo DVD/CDRW or a DVD-RW. Putting THAT aside for the moment, the Xbox is $179 new, or about $129 used. ($149 refurbished.) So for something between 2/3 and 1/2 the price of the Playstation, you can get your "socially acceptable" Linux machine.

      Note also that "acceptable" depends on the society in question. Sony is arguably as great an evil as Microsoft. A hardcore rights-and-responsibilities geek would eschew both companies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Cheap Linux Box by dsyu · · Score: 1

      I own one, and yes, in fact, PS2Linux is pretty slow. Not something you want to try running Mozilla on.

      It's really more for game developer hobbyists.

    7. Re:Cheap Linux Box by blincoln · · Score: 1

      It's a little inaccurate to compare the PS2 and the XBox processors based only on their clock speed. The EE is a totally different architecture.

      Also, I assume most people who are running Linux on a PS2 are coders. The MIPS assembly that the PS2 uses is much nicer than x86, IMO.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:Cheap Linux Box by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Most people will be doing their programming in C or C++, with only a few optimizations in assembler. I'm sure MIPS ASM is nicer than x86, that is a point in its favor - but it takes a lot more work to get about the same amount of work done with the EE than the Pentium in the Xbox, because you have to use the vector unit.

      The PS2 may very well be a fun system to dink around with because of the extra complexity, but this same complexity issue makes it less desirable at the same time. Really, there was no reason to go 128 bit, they probably should have used one faster 64 bit mips core instead of cooking up a complicated piece of hardware, it would have made it more friendly to everyone. I guess they just wanted to whip out their bitness and wave it around like it meant something, and it may have been a factor in the PS2's success - certainly it couldn't have hurt their marketing efforts any.

      The average person can get a lot out of running linux on the Xbox. Not least that you can use it to hack the system without altering any hardware :) This lets you use the system as a media player, which is really quite wonderful, so the average person can get some use out of a hacked Xbox. When I was a young teenager I knew a kid who had a floppy drive on his Super Nintendo (I had one later, but I've since sold it. Emulation is doing a dandy job of replacing 16 bit systems these days) and this is the same sort of thing to most people. They spend a little money and either buy a clip-on piece of hardware (there are no-solder modchips now and/or no-solder adapters for modchips, I don't know that much about it) so anyone willing to take out some screws can mod their Xbox. You can even install a modchip that will let you flash from a cdrw. So you don't even have to be a Unix type or a programmer to benefit from the Xbox's hackability.

      It's true that most people will abuse this characteristic, but I believe that most people will merely misuse it. In other words, most of them will not yet convert 100% to stealing games, though you could probably play every game you ever wanted to play without paying for a single one. You might rent it, which is paying a tiny slice of what it costs to purchase the same, and which results in an even tinier slice of profits going to the copyright holders. But people obviously still buy games in general, and mostly do not mod their systems at all.

      The thing is that people who do mod their systems are generally types that others follow in terms of what hardware they purchase. I really believe that a big part of the popularity of systems has to do with what the gamer hackers have to say about them. I know that when I was a kid, I looked up to the kids who had more skills than I did - what the hell, I still do. It keeps you motivated. Well, now it's mostly adults, but there's certainly a shitload of kids who can do all kinds of things I can't. Like beat homeworld :D

      Regardless I think you get more for your money with the Xbox. It simply adapts itself to more purposes than the PS2 at this point. If Sony were to open the PS2 platform the rest of the way, with full documentation and support for reading the cdrom and so forth, which I guess might happen if they ever EOL it (but since the PSOne is still apparently going strong, that will never happen) and the PS2 became an official Linux port, then it would be a lot more interesting. Frankly, I think it needs to come with both a hard drive and ethernet for $170. I think it would slaughter the Xbox if they came up with the hard disk and the nic for $150, and a few more network-enabled games came out. Software etc and so on now carry the 802.11g wireless bridges, so even the dumbest people can plug in some cheap network hardware (linksys, dlink, netgear, apple etc) and put their ethernet-equipped console on their broadband internet connection. Actually, anyone able to consult someone who knows anything about networking can be told to go to Home Depot and get some four-pair cat5 and som

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong article buddy

  17. Who cares if games are still overpriced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before: PS2 + 5 top games ($49): ~$400
    After price drop: ~$350, which is only 12% lower.

    Now if they lower price of the games to $20-$25 it will make a big difference.

    1. Re:Who cares if games are still overpriced? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      By this point though the PS2 has many older top 5 games. These can be found used and in rerelease for $20-$30. Personally, I always wait for games to at least drop to $40 before buying them anyway, but lately have been happy buying them used.

    2. Re:Who cares if games are still overpriced? by Spleener12 · · Score: 1
      Before: PS2 + 5 top games ($49): ~$400

      After price drop: ~$350, which is only 12% lower.

      And that's exactly why they would drop the price. Whatever money they may lose by dropping the price will be regained over time through software royalties, so it's no big deal if they drop the price now. I'm not sure if they'd drop it down to $99, but they will most probably drop the price for the holidays.

    3. Re:Who cares if games are still overpriced? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      In australia new games are $98, some $107 to $112.

      Average games 6months old crap is about $75, or so range.

      Platinum stuff is $49.95 here.

      So dollar for dollar on exchange, we are ripped of 30%, these brand new titles should be $74 at the TOP MOST PRICE POINT, not $112.

      Platinum should be max $35.

      Btw our retail music here is average $25 to $35 per album, and $5.95-$9 for singles.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    4. Re:Who cares if games are still overpriced? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      PS2 ($179) + 5 games ($49 a piece) = $424. Add in sales tax (7 percent) and we get a bill of $453

      The new pricing
      PS2 ($99) + 5 games ($49 a piece) = $344. Add in sales tax (7 percent) and we get a bill of $368.

      That's more like 20% savings.

      Furthermore, many of the games people who don't yet have a PS2 can be had for less than $49.

      Let's suppose I decide on the following games (all prices coming from ebgames.com)
      PS2 ($99) + Crazy Taxi ($15) + Devil May Cry ($15) + Final Fantasy X ($15) + GTAIII ($15) + GTA: VC ($25) + 2nd controller ($20) + Memory Card ($20) = $224. We'll ignore tax for this one. Now, with the old PS2 price...
      PS2 ($179) + the above = $304. There's a savings of 25%. You see, it's a substantial price cut. Anyone who tries to tell you that a drop from $179 to $99 isn't a substantial price cut, is silly.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  18. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point? You can buy a *value* desktop that is more powerful, and has REAL 3D support for the same price.

  19. Great, now I don't have to buy one now by tuffy · · Score: 1

    Disgaea was the first PS2 game to tempt me to buy one. But if Sony is going to drop the price on them by about half in a few months, I can hold off until then and play lots of Viewtiful Joe instead. Thanks Sony!

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  20. Will this kill the XBox? by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    The XBox is not a business success. Microsoft loses money on the whole XBox operation, even after collecting fees from game developers. Lots of money.

    It's hard to see how Microsoft can get the XBox to profitability. The original game plan was that decreasing electronics costs would eventually make the XBox profitable at the original price point. But Nintendo and Sony aren't letting Microsoft maintain that price point. They've pushed the price of game consoles down from around $300 to $100. Microsoft was losing money on every unit at $300; it's worse now.

    The only way Microsoft can make money with the XBox is if they achieve market dominance and pricing power. That's not happening. They've found themselves in price competition against larger competitors with lower costs, an unusual position for Microsoft.

    Microsoft is trying to design a lower-priced XBox 2, which might bail them out of this hole. But that's still some time away.

    1. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      "The original game plan was that decreasing electronics costs would eventually make the XBox profitable at the original price point. But Nintendo and Sony aren't letting Microsoft maintain that price point."

      Ah, competition... isn't it grand?

    2. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Alpha_Nerd · · Score: 4, Funny

      It may not be profitable now, but wait unitl the XBox 5...

    3. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By gaining marketshare now, Microsoft will be able to make money off people in the future with a second console with expanded features, etc. They're trying to get people to buy in now and then be locked in in the future.

      At least, that's what most people think the plan is. I can't think of any other reason for someone to enter the video game industry with such dominance by Sony and old standby Nintendo (who, granted, needs to start doing better.)

    4. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by 31+Flavas · · Score: 1
      You raise an intersting point. While the Xbox is popular, it is a complete business failure. What is supposed to sell the Xbox over the PS2 and GC, is that it's not "kiddy" like the GC, but not outdated like the PS2. Microsoft is trying to project it as the pinical of console gaming.

      But what is going to happen to the Xbox brandname if Microsoft has to scale back future Xbox models because of Sony out pricing them?

    5. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by TheTomcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I certainly hope you mean XBox 3.1, or XBox95.

      S

    6. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Aside from processing power and graphics capability which are if not equivalent (though not identical) the PS2 is only half the machine the Xbox is. Remember that the Xbox has a hard drive and ethernet as it ships, it has better video output capabilities, it has four controller ports. To get all this on your PS2, even priced at $99, will put it well above the Xbox's price. Add to this the underground credibility of the Xbox due to its hacking potential - It might say Microsoft on it, but tons of people who would never run Windows own an Xbox and are not only using it to run Linux - I'd say that they'll have to do a whole lot more than this to beat up the Xbox.

      If Sony wants to kill the Xbox they will have to bring out a version of the PS2 which comes with the hard drive and ethernet interface, which can both run linux and play games on the internet, and which costs no more than the Xbox. Obviously their PSX system (It is terribly ignorant of Sony to name their new system the PSX, given that their old system is commonly known as PSX, but that's a subject for another rant I guess) is not going to be any kind of competitor, as it will price itself right out of existence for almost everyone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      XBox 5... that's the next one, right? ;)

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    8. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      Nah, XBox 3 will be the killer. Everyone knows MS always does well on version 3.

    9. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by eclipsemgp · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. Underground creditability because you can put Linux on it? Gimme a break. Games sell consoles. Games. Not Linux, not a hard drive, not hacking ability, not one graphics chip versus another, nothing but games.
      People buy PS2 because there are a ton of games for the system. You could find pretty much any game you want in any genre for the PS2. People buy Gamecube's because they want to play Nintendo's quality games. Everybody loves Mario, Zelda, Metriod, and those games are usually of excellent quality. Hack ability and Linux do NOT sell Xboxes. Again the few exclusive games sell Xboxes and it seeming like not that many of them.

      Sony does not need to kill the Xbox again, they already have

    10. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by ziggles · · Score: 1

      "tons of people who would never run Windows" There are tons of them? Seems like a pretty insignificant percent of consumers last time I checked.

      The fact is, people will see the PS2 as 99 dollars and the xbox as 180, regardless of extra costs of necessary components, or older, slower hardware.. that's not what people see when they're looking at the advertisements making up their minds. They see: ps2 99 dollars, vice city 20 dollars, SCORE.

    11. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. Period. While Games are the primary driving force behind console sales, Linux-running ability does sell consoles. I bought a PS2 for gaming, but I bought the Xbox because it would run linux and work as a media center. I am hardly the only one, so obviously some percentage of sales are due to the ease of hacking. So you might say that Games primarily sell consoles, but you would be (and are) absolutely incorrect to say that hacking ability does not sell them.

      Since we were talking about running linux, I brought up the hacking issue. If we weren't, I would have neglected it.

      Nonetheless geeks are more likely to purchase a console they can hack. This is well-known. The same is true of computers. Plenty of Unix users have purchased Apples, and a number of them could reasonably considered to be "geeks" but most of them buy PCs because of the customizability and upgradability. People buy PS2s for games, because Linux on PS2 is craptacular. People buy Xboxes to play games, and to run Linux. People who would not have otherwise bought an Xbox buy them because it is possible to run Linux on them. I myself am proof thereof.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, many people too stupid to do an overall price comparison will make that decision. However anyone interested in online gaming who is that dumb will later be pissed off at sony when it is revealed that they must pay more, overall, to play games online. Those slightly more intelligent will simply purchase the Xbox to begin with. Of course intelligence is not the primary factor; desire for specific games is. If the game you want is only available on one platform, that's the platform you purchase, regardless of if it is more expensive. There are also other factors, such as which controllers you like better and so on, which can guide your purchase decision past price. However if you consider all that other stuff to be equal, you have to be some kind of idiot to not see the total price of a PS2, even at $99, is higher than that of an Xbox if you plan to do online gaming.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, competition... isn't it grand?

      Only until MS buys enough senators to impose a 400% import tarriff on Japanese game systems!

    14. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by eclipsemgp · · Score: 1

      If I am wrong, period, completely incorrect, show some facts to back this up?

      You are not representative of the whole. Because you mod your Xbox, does not mean everyone does. You are in the minority. How many consoles are sold because of the ease of hacking?

      I believe your original comment was "If Sony wants to kill the Xbox they will have to bring out a version of the PS2 which comes with the hard drive and ethernet interface, which can both run linux and play games on the internet, and which costs no more than the Xbox"

      Again, they have already succeeded, they outsell the Xbox by a big margin. Sony has a very large installed base, with a ton of games. Because you want a PS2 with a HD and Ethernet doesn't mean that they need to, they have already soundly beaten Microsoft.

    15. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else find it ironic that MS, with all it's proprietary solutions, actually has the more attractive product in this case, directly because it's proprietary solution is the easiest one to break?

      Leave it to Sony to teach MS how to implement a proprietary solution, so locked down, that it actually makes Microsoft's product look "open" in comparison!

      It's also very ironic that one of the big reasons Sony's Playstation series got off to such a good (read: dominating) start, is because the original Playstations were so easily mod chipped. Now it looks like the XBox is the one with this feature. Interesting cycle.

    16. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by giblfiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      mod the parent post up.

      As cool as Linux on the Xbox is it means jack shit in terms of sales. Even if it didn't the money is in the games, MS may not loose cash on an Xbox sale, but they sure as hell aren't making very much.

      As far as Ethernet and Hard-drives go once again they don't really make a big difference. Most people don't care about them, and those who do (admittedly a significant percentage of the market) tend to be the sort of people who buy one of each of the systems out anyway.

      The console market is still just about games. Maybe the next gen (or more likely the gen after that) will be more about Internet multi-player, but right now its sort of a peripheral perk.

    17. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Beating someone means removing them from the game. Microsoft continues to be a major player and their momentum is increasing. Xbox live continues to draw many people to their system. It looks like Microsoft will be the next Sega in terms of sports gaming, and they certainly have the most fully-developed online experience in console gaming.

      I never said everyone modded their Xbox, nor that I was in the majority. I simply said that hacking ability sells consoles. Look around the internet for hacking sites, and try to tell me that I'm the only one doing it. You could tell me, but you'd be lying. I know a fair number of people besides myself who bought an Xbox largely based on its hackability, and it would be both stupid and arrogant of me to believe that I knew everyone like that. Hence a substantial number of Xbox sales must have been due to this factor, even if it is a fairly insignificant percentage of units sold.

      Sony is currently ahead of Microsoft but it would be folly to assume that they will always be there. There was a time when Sony was the incumbent, but everyone else has learned from them since, and they will need to continue to innovate if they are going to keep the gap wide.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Sony's Playstation also came along at the right time for mod chipping to help it, as CD-R had just become affordable. This came too late to save Sega's Saturn system, and WAY too late to help the SegaCD.

      Today console system developers must walk a fine line between enough hackability, and too much hackability; If the system is too easy to copy games for (Read: Dreamcast) then sales will taper off to nothing. If you don't need to at least open the case and void your warranty (though the warranties are becoming so short nowadays as to be essentially meaningless in these terms) to play copied games, you are doomed to fail because your licensing revenue, which you depend upon to cover R&D and in some business models, to cover the loss you take when you sell a console, tapers off to nothingness.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by cmacb · · Score: 1

      "The only way Microsoft can make money with the XBox is if they achieve market dominance and pricing power. That's not happening. They've found themselves in price competition against larger competitors with lower costs, an unusual position for Microsoft. "

      Unusual in the 20 year sense, but not in the 10 year sense. Microsoft's biggest problem (not unlike any new company) is proving that their initial success with Windows was not just a fluke. They outlasted larger companies by lost-leader techniques to get their products in wide circulation. It did not take a genius to do this, just an autocratic outfit with staying power and a sugar daddy like IBM. Now that they operate like most other big corporations they are subject to the same internal political goings on that drive such companies to be short sighted generators of status-quo products.

      Whoever at Microsoft came up with the strategy of going head to head with Sony should be fired. They would have been much better off doing some sort of joint development deal with them. They are not an R&D company nor are they a consumer electronics company (nor are they a cable network content provider, or a magazine publisher). They badly need to diversify themselves through mergers and acquisitions, not by trying to topple established world-wide players. If Bill (and Steve) would retire I think it would help things along. Is that likely to happen? No. Ego trumps greed every time.

    20. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by scowling · · Score: 1

      That Linux sells consoles is statistically insignificant. The number sold because Linux can run on them is so small as to not even be considered a rounding error.

      He's not wrong, and you're only barely right.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    21. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I hate mario, zelda, and metroid, and I bought an XBox because I could run Linux on it, have access to save data to hard drive, and run 3rd party software on it. So, contrary to your statement, hack ability and Linux DID sell at least one XBox.

      And Sony didn't "kill" the XBox any more than it killed the GameCube. It simply had a huge head start in the market. They still make XBoxes and GameCubes, and they still sell games for both of them. Dead? Hardly.

    22. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      The PS/2 has been able to run Linux for awhile now, Sony sells the kit to do it. With your ever-important hard drive, if I remember correctly. And now that MS has patched the dashboard on the Xbox, it can't run Linux anymore without being hardware-modded.

      "But it can't run distro X!" Bollox. I've seen write ups on getting custom distros installed using CDRs and memory card files many times. Which seems no more difficult than the Xbox solutions I've seen, only with the added benefit of not voiding your warranty.

    23. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Spleener12 · · Score: 1
      Sony doesn't need to 'kill' the Xbox right now. At the moment, it's not a major threat. On your next point, there is a linux kit for the PS2 that you can order direct from Sony (hard drive, keyboard, mouse, VGA adaptor, broadband unit, some modified version of RedHat) though that's mostly for the hardcore Linux geeks.

      Sony has already released a broadband adaptor and will release a hard drive (not compatible with the PS2 linux one) for their system, though I doubt the'll sell well to anyone who doesn't want to play Final Fantasy XI. I can most definetly see Sony including a broadband adaptor and a hard drive with the PS3, though, seeing as the XBox has shown what you can do with them.

    24. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there are tons of people who would never run Windows. Maybe only about 6 or 7 people, but they are such fat asses that it comes out to tons.

    25. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by EchoMirage · · Score: 1

      The XBox is not a business success. Microsoft loses money on the whole XBox operation, even after collecting fees from game developers. Lots of money.

      Every time this gets discussed, people forget something important: Microsoft has all the money in the world to burn. Going into the console market, Microsoft knew that it would lose money on the first XBox. And the second. Maybe even the third. But Microsoft has way more staying power than Sony or Nintendo, and they can literally run the clock out on their competition. Here's how it goes for Microsoft:

      1) Enter the console market, round #1.
      1a) Acknowledge you will lose all your money, which you can cover, because you have tens of billions of dollars in liquid cash assets, plus your normal multi-billion dollar profits from year-to-year operations (which alone can easily cover all the losses incurred by entering this market).
      2) By doing 1, you've split the market up and taken away from competitors A and B (Sony and Nintendo).
      3) By doing 2, you've taken money and time away from competitors A and B.
      3a) Because of 2, Competitors A and B now have significantly smaller marketshare than before you entered, and must invest more of their own money to try to keep up.
      4) Acknowledge that the console market is far and away the biggest revenue source for Competitors A and B. Acknowledge that the console market is not your own biggest revenue source, and thus can sustain short-term injury.
      5) Enter the console market, round #2 (XBox 2, PlayStation 3, GameCube 2).
      6) By doing 5, you've even further split the market up and taken away from competitors A and B (Sony and Nintendo).
      6a) By doing 5, you've taken away even more money and time away from competitors A and B.
      7) Because of 2, Competitors A and B now have even smaller marketshares than before you entered, and must invest more of their own money to try to keep up.
      7a) Because of fierce competition in round #1, Competitors A and B are making less money per console and game sale and spending more money than before trying to remain competitive.
      8) Repeat steps 1-7a indefinetely
      8a) Continue to be able to fund your efforts from other, larger revenue chains (computer software sales) and your liquid cash assets.
      9) Competitor A or B runs out of money, and loses.
      10) Repeat steps 1-8a
      11) Remaining Competitor from step 9 runs out of money, and loses.
      12) Victory.

      It's a very simple, precise, and terrifying business model. And it will be effective.

    26. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously, the market for online gaming on the PS2 is next to nothing right now. But it's not a very big market to begin with. Microsoft can OWN that network and still not have enough to get by, while they're having their clocks cleaned by Sony on the single-player side.

    27. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Only in the absence of competition. It took
      version 5.0 of NT (Windows 2000) before they
      produced anything that was even in the same
      league as Linux, let alone Solaris or AIX.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    28. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. Some of the Linux buyers are
      volume buyers (I account for 5 so far, so
      I'm not there now, but I'm seriously
      considering XBox as a vehicle for a network
      appliance project) -- and this will increase
      substantially when there's a polished and
      tuned, user-friendly install image.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    29. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by inteller · · Score: 1

      If your favorite hobby was putting the pain to people, and you had 10 billion dollars to spend on it, would you do it? I know I would. And as a bonus I'd be the last one standing after I tortured and killed everyone off.
      Microsoft has something Sony will never figure out....Live. Ask any gamer if they would give up Live and see what kind of answer they give you.
      You wanna see failure, look at the PSX. Now THAT's failure.

    30. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      However networked gaming is only going to gain ground. Consider what it used to take to do networked gaming on home computers, you usually had to dial up point to point to another person's machine. Then much later, around the time of Quake in fact, we started to see internet gaming. Quake is the first PC game I can remember that supported gaming over TCP without using broadcast. (Hell, Doom even used broadcast on IPX, so a lot of schools with poorly designed networks outlawed it... Whee digressions.) But the point is, it wasn't until Quakeworld made it easy - partly a factor of coming at a time when development of technology made it feasible - and everything else followed it along. Now, if a game doesn't have multiplayer, unless it is inherently a single player experience, it is doomed to failure.

      I believe that console games are about to undergo the same transformation. If you look around, our world is becoming more and more wired. Some disturbing percentage of the world's population is carrying cellphones around and they have significantly more bandwidth than the modems I started playing multiplayer games on. When I began playing Quakeworld I had only a 14.4k modem, and almost any cellphone has that much bandwidth. Many of them have far more, and the latest phones are into the Megabit range now. Meanwhile broadband continues to gain acceptance around the world, but particularly in places where people have money - just the kind of people the console manufacturers are courting :)

      Incidentally, I think it would be a real good idea if Xbox 2 were based on Centrino, which would give you wireless in the package for a reduced cost, and reduce power dissipation through heat, so you could make the Xbox quieter and smaller. Let's face it, Xbox is to console gaming systems what the Console Television was to home theater - and no one is making console televisions any more.

      Networked games are only becoming more popular. With the wide deployment of broadband, it's reasonable to play any kind of game over the internet with people in almost any country. In a world in which you can have less than two seconds' lag to a server in another country, networked games are losing the stigma of lag that they've carried all their existence, because the underlying network is getting better.

      Mark my words, network support is going to be the big thing for the next generation of console games, as it is becoming the big thing for this generation of console games.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      2000 is the third release of NT. They started numbering it at 3.xx.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    32. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Remember that the Xbox has a hard drive and ethernet as it ships, it has better video output capabilities, it has four controller ports. To get all this on your PS2, even priced at $99, will put it well above the Xbox's price.

      Not everyone is interested in those features. I am not into multiplayer gaming (online or off), so ports for ethernet and more controllers are an unnecessary cost as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    33. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by cybergrue · · Score: 1
      Ah yes, the old divide and conquer routine that microsoft used back when it had compition in the PC market. The problem with you analysis is that microsoft is not the bigest dog in the market. Even with 42 Bil to loose you can't win if your competitor continually outsells you and is making a profit in the process. As for increasing market share, you always get increadable results when you start from zero. When Nintendo cut the GCN price, its market share increased (dramatically) and if Sony does the same, then they could probably expect the same result, without loosing a lot of money. This is because Sony has continually stramlined its production of the console and the startup cost have already been absorbed, whereas because microsoft used off the shelf components, the costs were already about as low as they could get, and they still lost money selling the console at $400 US. This was annother point you failed to consider.

      Microsoft intended for the XBox to be an entry vector for a home entertainment system that they would introduce later, one with an integrated gaming console, and media playback capabilities. Unfortuanaly both you and microsoft failed to consisder that Sony has also thought of this idea and is already implementing it as the PSX, which unlike microsofts proposed system does not include DRM.

      In conclusion, microsoft is figting against another business model: Give the consumer what they want, and make a profit doing so. I am constantly amazed that more companys dont see the verture of this simple model and instead try things like suing the end user or getting a law changed so as to deny consumers the right to choose.

    34. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot - there's a Linux kit for the PS2. This invalides most of the above posts you made and proves that you are, in fact, fucking retarded. Congrats and GET A HELMET!

    35. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by mantera · · Score: 1


      Such nonsense.

      I don't even know why this post got a mod 5 for being "interesting"; i guess interesting nowadays means "falsifiable and plain wrong".

      Linux is yet to make an impact on the desktop, let alone the xbox.

    36. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by mantera · · Score: 1


      oh yes, and another thing!

      The PSX has not priced itself out of existence, on the contrary if you look at the specs of the machine it's actually quite decently priced. Just consider that you get a PS2, a DVD burner, a 160GB or 250GB hard drive, a satelite reciever, a CD player and some other media and convenience capabilities and you'll see how well priced that machine is.

      The PSX's market is not that of the gamecube or xbox, it is probably in the same market as that Microsoft is trying to occupy with its media center offerings; Just try to to assemble or buy a PC with the specs of PSX, let alone how unsightly a PC is, and see what a great job Sony has done with it!

      That said though, it's almost inevitable that its price will drop, it's almost certain to be a killer machine.

    37. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to M$'s revenue from Windows and Office, it would be almost impossible for Sony to run them out of the console business.

      http://www.canada.com/technology/story.html?id=E 45 1FAC3-D17E-4EB9-A3B2-51971D42AFEE
      (last paragraph)
      >Sony's profits tumbled 98 per cent to 1.1 billion yen ($10 million) as sales dipped 7 per cent in the first fiscal quarter through June compared to a year ago.

      What does Microsoft pull in in a quarter? At least an order of magnitude more, I'd guess. I know they have more than $10 _billion_ in the bank.

      So who's going to outprice who? Can Sony really cut the price of its only profitable division's primary product below the point that Microsoft can cut the price of the XBox?

      Heh, if Sony really wanted to bite them in the ass, they would build a better OS.

    38. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I know you're just an ignorant ass, or a stupid troll. But I will respond anyway. Linux on PS2 uses an old kernel and is generally slow and crappy. Linux on Xbox is far superior. The Xbox has twice as much ram and can access the DVD-ROM, which PS2 linux cannot do. The Xbox comes with the hard drive and the network interface, and the PS2 does not. Since it costs more than $70 to get the linux kit, and linux on the PS2 is crappier than linux on the Xbox, the Xbox is a superior linux box for less money, even if Sony drops the PS2 price to $99.

      But, nice try.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Enucite · · Score: 1

      The problem with that arguement is that Microsoft makes no money on the console. (Some say they even lose a substantial amount) The point is, you buying consoles only increases the installed base that Microsoft can report to potential developers. They make money when games are sold. If you're not buying games, that doesn't help the platform in becoming successful.

      Microsoft is losing the console battle, and losing badly.

    40. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So Microsoft is in the console bussiness to continuely loose money?

      Or are you saying Microsoft makes the Xbox "just to make gamers happy"?

    41. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by hc00jw · · Score: 1
      It may not be profitable now, but wait unitl the XBox 5...

      Why is this modded as funny? Surely it should be Score:5, Scary , or some such?

    42. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Microsoft has way more staying power than Sony or Nintendo, and they can literally run the clock out on their competition.

      No.

      Sony has a market cap of over $30 billion. Sony has an installed base of over 40 million units. Sony is not going to run out of money.

    43. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But moron, your argument was not that Linux on the X-Box was superior than Linux on the PS2; your argument was that the X-Box sells because you can put Linux on it.

      If you want to change your argument at this point, fine - but all of your earlier posts make the claim that the X-Box is the only choice. You're a fucking moron.

      And look at the number of posts you've made on Slashdot, over 4,000. You've never touched a living human female, have you?

      HA HA

    44. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can't tell the difference between someone saying that Xboxes are sold because of their hackability, and someone saying that the reason the Xbox is selling reasonably well is that they run linux, and yet I am supposed to be the fucking moron? Train harder, grasshopper.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have friends, do you?

    46. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      It's not even going to take that long. The third edition of the Xbox will come out about the same time as Interactive 3d porn becomes the new big thing in adult entertainment. This has been MS's strategy from the beginning, you don't think it's a coincidence that the Xbox was targeted at "adult gamers" do you? Plus it always takes microsoft 3 versions to get it right, so this is right on schedule.

      Even better is the proposed name: The XXX-Box.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    47. Re:Will this kill the XBox? by entrager · · Score: 1
      If Sony wants to kill the Xbox they will have to bring out a version of the PS2 which comes with the hard drive and ethernet interface, which can both run linux and play games on the internet, and which costs no more than the Xbox.
      First off, as someone else pointed out: Linux doesn't sell a console, games do.

      But this entire argument is crap. The PS2 *does* come with a network adaptor now. There is a Linux kit for the PS2 (http://playstation2-linux.com/). The Linux kit comes with a hard drive, but even without that you can buy one in March. The fact is, most users don't need a hard drive anyway.

      Furthermore, how much does XBox Live! cost? How much am I paying to play my PS2 online? I'm sorry, but if the PS2 were to become $99, it would KILL X-Box.
  21. avoidable alliteration awkwardly accomplished by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1

    Surely sundered sanity seizes sovereignty soon!

    1. Re:avoidable alliteration awkwardly accomplished by mythr · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't call me Shirley!

  22. Great news for Xbox by Fervent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Sony does this (somehow I doubt it, although a drop to $150 wouldn't be unexpected), MS has got to drop. Imagine picking up what's essentially a computer in a box for $99.

    To be honest, as a geek, Xbox has become my favorite plaything. The games have started to get very good (I've been playing Panzer Dragoon and Voodoo Vince pretty much non-stop) and, when you're ready to hack the system, all the parts are there. I actually have two: one legitimate one I use on Xbox Live and another I've sacrificed for hacking. Hard drive, Intel processor, networking, nice video: card all for $100? I'll pick up another. :)

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Great news for Xbox by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People don't care about the diff bewtween 150 and 200, you have to drop it to rounded off 100's to make anyone notice. People have been trained to like things close to 10, 100, 1000 increments by print and TV ads for centuries you can't change it now.

    2. Re:Great news for Xbox by 97jaz · · Score: 1

      MS already takes a substantial loss on each XBox unit sold. I'm not sure they would be willing to take an even larger loss...

  23. price drop extremely likely by rusty635 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to say that I'm certain it's going to happen, but it's very likely. I was reading in a recent wal-mart magazine that the prices on PS2 and XBox's would be dropping--though I didn't have a certain price. Now, the main reason, I'm thinking, is probably to do this in time for Christmas, so it'd hafta be going on soon. Basically, I'm just agreeing with the "rumors" in the article.

  24. Own all the consoles by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I can own all three systems for $300 and the next generation consoles are no where in sight. Can't think of a better time to buy.

    Seriously I don't even buy games on release dates anymore. Wait a couple weeks and it's down to $39. Wait a year and it's at $29.

    1. Re:Own all the consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are Microsoft and the game is named Halo.

    2. Re:Own all the consoles by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Actually Viewtiful Joe for the GCN was released at $40... probably another price reduction to help sell the Cube.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  25. Good deal by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    I've wanted a ps2 in my home for a long time. They sell it for 99 and they'll get one in my home along w/ FFX, Kingdom Hearts, the network addapter, maybe EOA, and the Dvd player stuff.

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:Good deal by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Tip: Do FFX before starting KH. I did 'em in reverse order, and it kinda minimized the impact FFX should have jad in its own right. They're different games, not sequels but play 'em in order anyway.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:Good deal by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      For the record, you don't need the DVD extra. All it provides is a wireless remote; you can play DVDs right away using a standard controller for the buttons. I think you need the extra for XBox (surprise), but not the PS2.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    3. Re:Good deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh*

      Playing DVD movies with a DUALSHOCK2 controller is a big hassle and getting a DVD remote is probably on the list if you watch DVDs on your Playstation 2. I know because I own both an Xbox and a PS2 and bought the remote for the PS2 becuase it makes things easier.

      Whatever works for you... fine. I prefer to make things easier on myself even if a remote costs $15.

    4. Re:Good deal by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      *confused look*

      1) Insert DVD.
      2) Use the D-pad to move around the menu and X to make the 'Play' selection.
      3) Watch the movie.

      If you are just watching a movie, what's the big deal? If you're sitting far enough away that the cord doesn't reach (which would be odd if you play games on it), just wait the 45 seconds to sit down until you've started the movie. What the hell is so complicated that you need an actual remote?

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    5. Re:Good deal by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      People would probably accept it more as less of a GEEK toy and more of a home theater piece if you don't use a video game controller to navigate your DVD.

      --
      I do security
  26. Huh? by mhlandrydotnet · · Score: 1
    Sony is ready to roll the manufacturing plants for their smaller 90 nanometer PS2 CPU. Maybe that price drop isn't so unbelievable after all.

    It seems to me that using new hardware would increase the price of production as opposed to decreasing it. Does anyone have any figures?

    1. Re:Huh? by adb · · Score: 1

      More chips per wafer => cheaper chips. Setting up the process costs overhead, but there is substantial savings per unit.

  27. Oblig. Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M: The principle's the same. The Mohammedans don't come 'round here wavin' bells at us! We don't get Buddhists playing bagpipes in our bathroom! Or Hindus harmonizing in the hall! The Shintos don't come here shattering sheet glass in the shithouse, shouting slogans-
    W: All right, don't practice your alliteration on me.

  28. Absolutely! by rmdyer · · Score: 1

    Hear hear! Yes, you are right. I also will never buy a console for the following reasons...

    1. Graphics are inferior.
    2. No mouse control.
    3. Inability to mod games.
    4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.
    5. Consoles depreciate faster than PCs.
    6. Inability to store several games at once?
    7. Internet gameplay almost impossible without service, even if free, is monitored.
    8. Inability to easily run servers.
    9. Requires development license for developers.
    10. Poor games. Except for Halo, Most games are arcade style with very little emphasis on visualization/realism technologies that made PC games so exciting...ex, Half-Life2.
    11. Developers are "trapped" by the console's limited OS infrastructure.
    12. Consoles are "toaster" technology that doesn't impart any requirement for the user to "learn" anything new. A "cattle for slaughter" mentality from the huge Microsoft and Sony corps.

    Probably plenty more that I have forgotten!

    Just say "No" to consoles!

    +2

    1. Re:Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.
      5. Consoles depreciate faster than PCs.

      And, just what hardware can you buy at $99 that grants you the ability to play every PS2 game? You say it like investing money in anything besides computer hardware is sinful or something. Plus, mentioning depreciation is truly laughable. I can name a half dozen game cartriges that have increased in value since their release. Many are for the SNES, some for the N64.

      9. Requires development license for developers.

      Only if you want to distribute in the traditional fashion. Look into the underground GBA development market sometime. You may be surprised at what you find.

      11. Developers are "trapped" by the console's limited OS infrastructure.

      Developers are more 'trapped' by a single development API (DirectX, OpenGL, SDL, etc) than they will ever be on a console where they have the option of developing 'on the metal' and optomizing with lots and lots of time and effort. You cannot do that sort of optomization when you have to write code to land on PC's with a variety of hardware configurations. Compare old Playstation games to some of the later ones (FF7 vs. Chrono Cross) and get back to me.

      12. Consoles are "toaster" technology that doesn't impart any requirement for the user to "learn" anything new. A "cattle for slaughter" mentality from the huge Microsoft and Sony corps.

      That's just insulting to anyone who plays and enjoys console games. You can spout your drivel all you want, it doesn't suddenly mean that playing Starcraft taught you some valuable life lesson, or that all that time mastering the harder levels in Super Monkey Ball 2 were time wasted.

      Finally, just look at the amount of development that people sink into consoles. Look at what came of the Dreamcast. Look at the XBox. Look at all the emulators out there for old consoles and new. People enjoy their consoles, enjoy the games on them.

      In short, you're just another elitist slashbot with a karma bonus.

    2. Re:Absolutely! by brandorf · · Score: 1

      While I can't refure all of these points, I can refute some. 2. No mouse control. With the PS2's USB ports, any time a developer decides not to include Mouse/Keyboard options this is a developer choice. As well as with any system that has a mouse/keyboard availiable, it is the developer that chooses not to implement it. Should I hate Quake 3 if it doesn support my gamepad? (I haven't tried this, so it's just an example) 4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games. You'll have to clarify this, as I really don't understand what you're trying to say. 5. Consoles depreciate faster than PCs. I've always found the opposite to be true. Computer software/hardware rarely hold their value as long as console equipment. I just picked up Neverwinter nights for $5 NEW, you'll never see recent console games sell that low. Unless you're using depreciate in some odd way? 6. Inability to store several games at once? As far as game playing goes, This is a moot point, every single game on PC I own wants me to insert the CD before I play, so unless you're referring to applying no-CD cracks to every game you have installed, this doesn't count (and usually causes more problems that it's worth. 7. Internet gameplay almost impossible without service, even if free, is monitored. This IIRC, only applies to X-Box live, PS2 uses your personal ISP for the connection, as is also the case with the Gmecube. 8. Inability to easily run servers. "Dedicated" servers yes, but the other kind is usually as easy as selecting "Host game". 9. Requires development license for developers. Well, there is a development solution availiable for the PS2 (Linux Kit). But this is mostly to protect their copyrights. If anyone could create an unliscened game for their systems, how would the subsudized consles make any money? 11. Developers are "trapped" by the console's limited OS infrastructure. Any developer is "trapped" by the constraints of whatever particular system they choose to develop for. If you code for windows, you have to use directX or OpenGL for your games. Nobody wants to code from scratch and write a new API. 12. Consoles are "toaster" technology that doesn't impart any requirement for the user to "learn" anything new. A "cattle for slaughter" mentality from the huge Microsoft and Sony corps. These are video game systems! The point is to make everyting as simple as possible so that they can appeal to as large a market as possible!

      --


      Bork Bork Bork!!
    3. Re:Absolutely! by yerricde · · Score: 1

      And, just what hardware can you buy at $99 that grants you the ability to play every PS2 game?

      Not even a PS2 can play every PS2 game. Unlike PCs, PS2 consoles have region lockout. One would need either three PS2 consoles (one each for Europe, USA, and Japan) or non-US citizenship to defeat this region lockout.

      Look into the underground GBA development market sometime. You may be surprised at what you find.

      Yes, I'm part of the thriving GBA scene, but you seem to forget grandparent's "1. Graphics are inferior" complaint. PC graphics even on a laptop beat GBA graphics because the GBA is a 2D system and does all 3D in software at 120x80 pixels. In addition, it costs an extra $100 for a flash cartridge to be able to run full-size homebrew programs on the GBA.

      Look at what came of the Dreamcast.

      I'd get into Dreamcast development, but the amateur development kit for the Dreamcast (KOS) isn't well documented. Neither is OpenXDK.

      Neither consoles nor PCs are the best thing since sliced bread.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    4. Re:Absolutely! by lightspawn · · Score: 1

      > 2. No mouse control.
      Games are designed to utilize controllers, not mice.

      > 4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.
      And vice versa. Consider the price of the top of the line graphics card - more than the entire console.

      > 6. Inability to store several games at once?
      Huh? Even a standard PSX memory card has 15 save slots. The Xbox actually lets you have virtually unlimited saves on the hard drive.

      > 10. Poor games
      You've got to be kidding.

      > 11. Developers are "trapped" by the console's limited OS infrastructure
      PC developers are trapped by having to choose the minimal hardware to support, confused by infinite configurations, and undermined by the OS limitations. How is being completely free worse than being limited by the OS?

      > 12. Consoles are "toaster" technology that doesn't impart any requirement for the user to "learn" anything new.
      ?????
      Are you specifically looking for appliances that are difficult to learn and use?

      Overall, it sounds like you only know about PC-type games - and you're right, these are best on the PC. But there are so many game types you're not even aware of.

      And consider these. I can play my NES and SMS games from 15 years ago. How many of your 15 year old PC games can you still play?

    5. Re:Absolutely! by toriver · · Score: 1

      1. Graphics are inferior.

      Only if you consider pixel count to be more important than how it actually looks.

      2. No mouse control.

      Er, it's a "limitation" that game authors are aware of, hence console games don't need one.

      3. Inability to mod games.

      Is that something you do often?

      4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.

      What you seem to write is that your PC expenses are too high for you to afford a console - which isn't so strange...

      5. Consoles depreciate faster than PCs. ... because this is patently false: Console makers are on a 4-5 year cycle, while PC graphics card makers are on a six-month cycle. The latest and greatest PS2 title runs on my years-old PS2, the latest and greatest PC game might require an investment in more hardware - possibly costing as much as a $99 console in its own right.

      6. Inability to store several games at once?

      "Store" meaning...? If you mean "lack of install nightmares", yes, except some XBox games seem to install stuff and require patches. But then they're just restricted PCs anyway.

      7. Internet gameplay almost impossible without service, even if free, is monitored.

      Whereas multiplayer in the same room is thousandfold easier. Consoles are for the social gamer.

      8. Inability to easily run servers.

      It seems you are focused/limited to one particular genre og game, and that genre is not very present on consoles...

      10. Poor games. Except for Halo, Most games are arcade style with very little emphasis on visualization/realism technologies that made PC games so exciting...ex, Half-Life2.

      Ah, you are focused on the niche of first-person shooters. Well, yes, these are generally better on PCs, unlike fighting games and platformers which are way better on consoles.

      11. Developers are "trapped" by the console's limited OS infrastructure.

      Or, looked at in a different way, they don't have to spend months testing their game in a million different configurtations or list two pages worth of what configurations they have tested with.

      12. Consoles are "toaster" technology that doesn't impart any requirement for the user to "learn" anything new.

      I will conclude with the words "Elitist prick".

    6. Re:Absolutely! by wan23 · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people have responded to this so I'll make my comments brief...

      2. No mouse control.

      Who the heck wants to play Soul Calibur 2 or Mario Party with a mouse? Metroid? DDR? Why?
      6. Inability to store several games at once?

      Um... that's cuz console games don't need to be installed... Both require the CD to play so I don't see what you're getting at
      10. Poor games. Except for Halo, Most games are arcade style

      GTA3? (PC port doesn't run on my computer... and a PS2 is cheaper than an upgrade) DDR? (simulators are (though awesome) kinda illegal...) Metroid? Mario Party? Zelda? Fighting games? Sports games? How many adventure games have come out for PC in the past few years? Any good space shooters? And arcade style games are *fun*, duh. And Halo sucks...
      11. Developers are "trapped" by the console's limited OS infrastructure.

      Write back when you stop playing Windows games.

    7. Re:Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unlike PCs, PS2 consoles have region lockout. One would need either three PS2 consoles (one each for Europe, USA, and Japan) or non-US citizenship [thefreeworld.net] to defeat this region lockout.
      It's called modding, welcome to 2001.
  29. Yes it will help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right. The PS2 is for the older market. Including the pussy whipped married guys whose wives want let them spend $200 on a console but MIGHT let them spend $99.

  30. What would happen? by aliens · · Score: 1

    If the next generation of game consoles came out at $150 price point?

    You know how quickly they could saturate the market? Would the quikness hurt sales? I mean if PS3 came out at that point and Xbox2 was $300+ which one would you get?

    This would certainly help to have a huge user base to buy games which iirc are the main source of revenue and profits.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:What would happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If PS3 and XBOX2 came out with the same price point with the XBOX2 coming out a year before the PS3. I'd still get the PS3. I haven't seen a single game I care about on the XBOX. Halo looks like it would be entertaining for all of 5 minutes.

  31. I was just at a Sony seminar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work at a Zellers store (Canadian equiv. of Target/Wal-Mart etc.) and just went to a seminar held by Sony to help area stores sell their crap better and to show off new stuff like the EyeToy.
    There were a ton of questions about stuff, of course someone asked what Sony's response to the Cube price drop was. They answered that there were no plans to do anything about it as the Cube is aimed at a very different group of people (ie kids).
    I also haven't heard anything from the Sony rep. in our area who I'm pretty good friends with, or in upcomming fliers.
    It could very well be true of course, just nothing that's passed my way has mentioned it.

  32. Go away Troll.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same argument almost every time a video game console story appears on the Slashdot main page. "NOOOO...Mouse, blah, blah"

  33. GC have anything like the new PS2 netplay games? by Mongoose · · Score: 1


    Okay, so this is slightly offtopic but...

    Monster Hunter for PS2 is like a multiplayer morrowind meets rune game that has USB kb support. Finally networked games worth playing on a console. =)

  34. Duh by sbeast702 · · Score: 0

    Of course they are going to lower the price. They want to stay competitive. They did it with the PS, I have no doubt that they will with the PS2.

  35. Excellent points!! by rmdyer · · Score: 1

    Mod this man up!

    I remember when I used to play Doom, then Quake with the keyboard. Everyone around me was saying try the mouse, but I didn't think I would like it so I kept on playing with the keyboard as I knew it like the back of my hand. Then, after months and months of just getting blasted by my foes on the game I decided to try it. Man, what a change! Instant 360 degree rotation! I was fragg'n with the best of them. I'll never go back. Sometimes you just gotta' try new things.

    +1

  36. The price drop is unlikely, but is still possible by Rolman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GCN selling at $99 is putting it as a temporary loss. Nintendo is not losing too much money to make it a dangerous thing, in fact, they could make it profitable again in the next manufacturing round.

    The GCN was designed from the very beginning as a low-price machine. The ATI and IBM chips are very well integrated and have a lot of room for costs reduction. At the time of launch, they were still made using a .18 micron process and that can be dramatically improved now.

    Many regarded the GCN's production halt as a sign of weakness, but this has been a normal move since the first NES. I can certainly see a more integrated GCN motherboard (can the thing be even better? It's already incredibly tiny and simple), maybe even putting everything on one die, just what ultimately happened with the SNES. Slashing costs even further is possible because the TSOP technology used is far chesper now than in 2000 when the GCN's spec was frozen.

    For Nintendo, this is something they had planned for so long and it's finally paying off. But Sony and Microsoft have much more to lose if their price point got to that low level.

    Sony just launched the SCPH-50000 model a few months ago, so I don't think they can roll out a .09 micron console so easily. Microsoft OTOH has not been able to make the Xbox much cheaper, they were supposed to show an "Xbox-lite" smaller console this year at E3, but the event came and went without any sign of it. Still, Sony and Microsoft may need to follow suit, if only to keep sales strong.

    This Christmas season suddenly seems a lot more interesting and leaves me wondering about the next one... Historically these price drops happen only when the next consoles are around the corner, which is definitely not the case here.

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
  37. How to earn karma and influence slashdotters by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    (and by bringing this up 'how to be modded as troll'.)
    Take every possible chance to slam the Xbox, even if the article isn't specifically Xbox related:

    1. tell everybody how it loses money on every unit sold.
    2. Evil Empire microsoft bad, evil empire Sony good.
    3. fail to realise that they ALL have their good and bad points, and there are still people futzing around with the Atari 2600, dreamcast, et. al. And when (if?) one of the three players fails, hey CHEAP GAMES!

    BTW, The judges are docking you points because you fail to mention the URL for that Game shop owner (who's name escapes me at the moment, you know the one.) and that comic making fun of the Xbox controller's size.

    Sheesh folks, MOVE ON! At $200 or less for Any of these things, buy one of each or don't. (And try not to think your allowance is going to several multi-billion dollar conglomerates that LOVE you either way you go.)

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  38. YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like taking candy from a baby

    1. Re:YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking pedo

  39. Resident Evil?!? by caveat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, really a kid's game. I know the primary market is still fuzzy friendly games, but there *is* a decent selection of 'adult' games on the GC (and it looks hella better than PS2 or Xbox). Is Rockstar releasing the next GTA for all 3 consoles?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Resident Evil?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hella"? Ok, now it's confirmed that it's the kiddie market we're seeing here. Intellectually, anyways.

  40. Console style games on computers by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Do you believe in restricting independent amateurs from making console style games because they can't afford the 5 or 6 figures USD necessary to buy a legitimate development kit for GameCube or Xbox? Or are you willing to that the best console game pad is compatible with PC games through a $16 adapter?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Console style games on computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best console gamepad is definately an opinion. I have a PS2 (and Xbox, GC, and Dreamcast), and I do have one of those adaptors, but man does PS2's controller suck. The controller is designed so as to make it easier to access the d-pad rather than the analog stick. It makes it terrible. Also given that the stick has little resitance and the pad has no ernomics, it's just terrible. Dreamcast has the best controller IMHO, followed by GC, then Xbox, then PS2.

    2. Re:Console style games on computers by yerricde · · Score: 1

      The controller is designed so as to make it easier to access the d-pad rather than the analog stick.

      Which is exactly why I bought a PS2->GCN controller adapter for use with my Game Boy Player.

      It makes it terrible.

      Have you ever tried to play Tetris or traditional one-on-one fighting games with an analog stick?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:Console style games on computers by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes? And I also hate kittens, babies and apple pie? I'm not sure I understand how buying a usb adapter for my controller allows independent amateurs to make console games without paying licensing fees.

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    4. Re:Console style games on computers by Ondo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to play Tetris or traditional one-on-one fighting games with an analog stick?

      I've tried playing fighting games with an analog stick. It sucks on the Playstation. It sucks on the Dreamcast. It works beautifully on the GameCube. I'm not entirely sure why the difference, but it's at least partly because the GameCube's analog stick is set into an octagon, rather than a circle. This makes it very easy to make sure you're going in precisely the direction you want.

  41. Games are where the money's at. by caveat · · Score: 1

    That's all I have to say, it's been pointed out ad nauseum...

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  42. Re:The price drop is unlikely, but is still possib by juuri · · Score: 1

    If you look at the financials for hardware expenditures and profits in the GC division Nintendo was making a hefty profit on the GC hardware before so they may not be incurring any losses at all while at the $99 price point. In addition Nintendo was farming out manufactoring to China which was expected to cut costs.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  43. thirty-two players? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    64 players is a lot. 24-32 is decent.

    How do you expect to fit 32 players into a room in a single-family residence? How do you expect to have players' parents approve of disconnecting their consoles and TVs and LANning up? Oh, you mean Internet play? Many areas are still not wired for residential high-speed Internet access, and satellite still has too much latency for real-time gaming. (Civ and Tetrinet are turn based so they don't count.) Even in areas wired for broadband, most minor children's allowances are not large enough to afford upwards of $400 per year for broadband.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  44. College housing by yerricde · · Score: 0

    (but only if the TV is standing close to the computer)

    When I lived at college, my TV was 200 miles away from me because I didn't have space in my dorm room for a dedicated TV, and a good TV input card (i.e. not an ATI TV Wonder VE) was too pricey for my budget. I survived the first two years of college with PC games and emulated console games, adding a GBA at the start of my junior year.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  45. my friend is son of PS2 representative here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in my country (in portugal) and he said that in a month the ps2 would decrease the price a lot.

  46. I hate the name PSX for the PS2vo by yerricde · · Score: 1

    They're releasing their "new version" of the PS2, the.. PSX, I think?

    I've got over the confusion of IBM PS/2 vs. Sony PS2, but I call this new Sony hardware the "PS2vo" because Sony itself used the name "PSX" for a PS1 in the old form factor (picture). A Google Images search for "psx" turns up only one picture of a PS2vo and lots of pictures of PS1s.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:I hate the name PSX for the PS2vo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And....?

    2. Re:I hate the name PSX for the PS2vo by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Don't you get it? Sony is shooting itself in the foot. Kids will ask for a PSX (a PS2 with a built-in DVR) for Christmas, and Santa will bring a PSX (a PS1).

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
  47. $12/hr liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's cool, but you must admit... why would a Sony employee disclose a strategic price drop to a Zellers employee? Messages and techniques, I can understand, since you have to train in those. But a price drop? No prep required. When it hits you, you'll know. No training necessary.

  48. Re:The price drop is unlikely, but is still possib by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Per a recent interview with the head of marketing at NOA, they still are not losing money on the consoles and "refuse to ever sell hardware at a loss." Just so ya know.

  49. games by ay2b · · Score: 1

    It's nice that they're droping the price of the console, but that's never really been a problem as far as I'm concerned. What good is a console (any console) without a good selection of games? At 50 bucks a pop, it's expensive to build up library of games.

    When they drop the price of new games to the $10-$20 range, then I'll get another console. (I have an Xbox because I was able to get games at $10 each.)

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  50. What sells consoles? Games! DUH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody outside of slashdot cares about Linux on the Xbox. Hardly anyone cares about the Xbox having a hard drive. It's all about the games. Halo sells the Xbox, Final Fantasy and GTA sell the PS2, and Mario and Zelda sell the Gamecube.

  51. Hooray! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    I can trade in all my Mediaplay points and get me a PS2. I love competition.

  52. Pedantry by Sagarian · · Score: 1

    alliteration is the repitition of consonant sounds. assonance is the repetition of vowel sounds. if you're gonna go for highbrow humor, get it right :)

    1. Re:Pedantry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIT alumunus. ha.

  53. I'm not surprised.. by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why? Simple; age, competition, and Christmas season (Those of you who worked in retail know what I'm talking about).

    How in the PS2 now? Almost 3 years old (In the US). Based on previous game consoles, that means the PS2 is nearing the average lifetime of a console (which is about 3~5 years).
    Regardless of sales and the numbers game, Sony is under pressure to continue the impression that they're dominating the market. The gaming industry may be big business, but as it is the gaming industry is a harsh, demanding market with little room for failures or mistakes. (Sega being the biggest example) If Sony was to lose footing due to the PS2's weak hardware (expansions don't really count) and fails to bring the PS3 out in time to compete, Sony will be in huge trouble.

    Christmas will be here in less than 3 months. What more can I say?

    1. Re:I'm not surprised.. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I mean all they need to do is double the power, increase ram to 92m or so... give it a built in real ethernet port (why did they asses choose firewire?, usb was usefull but underutilized, make it usb2 now)
      Redesign the box to look sleeker, symetrical.
      Add a HD to it, and at least it then could show current games at a better speed/detail/with FSAA and HD storage, not these lameass memory cards 5x CF prices.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  54. Good point, bad logic by bartyboy · · Score: 1

    Seeing as Gutenberg made his press in the middle of the 15th century and that the first ads weren't printed until mass literacy came around, we haven't been exposed to flyers advertising stuff for 9.99 and 99.99 until very recently - maybe a few decades. Ditto for the TV ads.

    But your point is correct - people don't want to buy something that costs $10.00. They want it for $9.99 - maybe because it has less digits.

    1. Re:Good point, bad logic by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Well I would argue that some english newspapers have been around for over 200 years, and the jcpenney catalog was like 100 years old recently.

  55. SCPH-50001 just came out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One store has them locally. And only in one place, where they dumped the new pallets.

    This unit is pretty nice.

    Maybe Target is blowing out the old units in preparation?

  56. Not a pedant by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Pedants typically read.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  57. Re:GC have anything like the new PS2 netplay games by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

    Phantasy Star Online is, by all accounts, highly dope. Although its netplay is more in the Diablo II mold.

  58. actually, yeah it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smaller == cheaper.

    You put more parts togehter and thus have fewer packages and pins. Chips go in in price with die area, pins and of course packages cost money too. You can reduce the cost of all these.

    Also, smaller processes use less power. That means a smaller power supply and smaller fan too. That also reduces cost.

    Smaller is cheaper in electronics very nearly axiomatically.

  59. did you see the "style"? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I understand how buying a usb adapter for my controller allows independent amateurs to make console games without paying licensing fees.

    I didn't say "console games." I said "console style games" (emphasis added). Targeting a PC with a console controller connected through a USB adapter lets amateurs develop and publish PC games that use a console-style control paradigm.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  60. Meaning of "non-US citizenship" in grandparent by yerricde · · Score: 1

    It's called modding

    Note the circumvention ban in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Note the "non-US citizenship" condition I mentioned and the lack of the United States on the map on the front page of thefreeworld.net to which I linked.

    welcome to 2001.

    Welcome to 1998, when 17 USC 1201 was enacted. Region lockout is a technological measure that "effectively protects a right of a copyright owner" (section 1201(b)) to restrict imports under section 602.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  61. Price Drop and New Model? by tigris · · Score: 1



    I wonder whether the price drop might be related to the reported introduction of the new model in the U.S. soon. Perhaps they're lowering the cost on the old model to clear stock on it more quickly? Or maybe they're going for a two-tier pricing scheme: $179 for the SPCH-50000 and $99 for the older version.

  62. another thought by slanky · · Score: 1

    If they drop it to 99, that also puts it into direct competion with many dvd players.