Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake Linux 9.2 Hits the Street

joestar writes "Just announced at Mandrake's website, Mandrake 9.2 (FiveStar) has just been released. Mandrake Club members get full access to 9.2 ISOs (through BitTorrent), as well as... all 9.2 contributors and translators. But the best news, in addition to all (impressive) 9.2 features is that everybody can access the traditional binary & sources tree! Public release of Mandrake 9.2 ISOs will happen at the same time as Mandrake 9.2 Pack availability in retail. It makes sense."

262 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Re:all i want to know by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    These days, probably pretty damn fast. Check your search function.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  2. Download Edition by LunarOne · · Score: 1

    Is this the one that serves up ads during installation? (As long as the ads end after the install, I guess it's okay).

    --

    Read my sig if you like, but I'll never see yours, thanks to Discussions, Viewing, Disable sigs...
    1. Re:Download Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Is this the one that serves up ads during installation? (As long as the ads end after the install, I guess it's okay).

      Who cares what it displays during installation? Once it starts installing the RPMs I just go grab a drink or something and come back 20 minutes later. Do you actually sit in front of the install watching it? I've always found it's like watching paint dry. "Oooh, it's almost done... oh damnit, they just added on 15 more minutes... wait.. it's down to 15 minutes left.. what now it's up to 20. God damnit."

    2. Re:Download Edition by agustkara · · Score: 1

      hahahaha! good one! :-)

  3. Thanks..but nobody asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    from the not-debian-but-pretty-good-anyway dept.

    Michael, is it possible that you stop being a jackass once in a while?

    We don't care that you love debian, what does it have to do with Mandrake?

    Put that in your journal, stop trolling offtopic stuff in your stories.

    1. Re:Thanks..but nobody asked by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      it's just the dept tagline. Don't freak out. He didn't insert his comments in the story. At least Mandrake MADE it onto slashdot.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    2. Re:Thanks..but nobody asked by Gil-galad55 · · Score: 1

      Easy, Trigger. Sense of humour? Or at the very least, enough apathy to not be incensed by trivial things?

      --

      To follow knowledge like a sinking star, / Beyond the utmost bound of human thought. ("Ulysses", Tennyson)

    3. Re:Thanks..but nobody asked by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      It's humor, that's all.

      Now, if he were genuinely trolling, that might be a different matter, but it's just him being silly.

      On this site, preferring Debian is something of a running gag, even if it is the predominant opinion.

  4. Re:Suse Linux 9 by setzman · · Score: 1
    Suse Linux 9 hit the streets yesterday

    Don't see a press release on the Suse site. Where did you see this at?

    --
    C:\>
  5. Excellent. by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    I was wondering what had become of Mandrake.

    Now, if only Gentoo woudl release a version that would boot an IBM RS/6000 7025 F50 from a CD, I'd be happy.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Excellent. by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Hey, on a machine like that you should be running AIX, not Linux. Then again, if you insist on only wanting to run Linux on that fine RS/6000, I'll gladly take it off your hands and load a proper OS for the machine.

    2. Re:Excellent. by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly call it a fine machine .. I have an F30 which I loaded Debian on, and it's a bit sluggish, but usable as a squid proxy and some other tasks. I doubt that the F50 is *that* much better. Anyway, when I got this machine I didn't have the root password for AIX, nor the install disks, so I slapped Linux on it. Plus I'm much more familiar with Linux, so it works for me.

    3. Re:Excellent. by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      I have the AIX disks for it, up to version 4.3.x, IIRC. These machines are just for me to mess with, I got them for free (yes plural...2 of them), along with 2 SSA RAID towers + hardware to put them together. I'd probably have to run AIX to access those, but I really just wanted to have an OS I knew I could mess with because once I wipe these things out, I'm not sure I have a C compiler I can install for AIX (missing disc).

      If you can't tell, I'm not really experienced with bare bones OS installs (I.e. usually the CD goes in and I wait 45 minutes, i never have to tinker with anything), and I'm also not familiar with how easy it will be to get gcc and put it on these things with AIX. I suppose some research is in order.

      First order of business, however, will be to find either a video card, a male-to-male 9-pin RS-232 cable for the Planar ELT320-P1, or a keyboard for the IBM InfoWindow II 3153 so that I can actually use the damn things. I attempted to put a Rage128 from one of my older G4s in it, which works fine with firmware until AIX tries to boot, then I get an error about drivers being too large or something ("APPL Mac ATI Rage size too large > 1024 bytes" or something, 3 lines of it, screen goes dark before i can really read it, I assume that means "Video card no good, dumbass").

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  6. The club? by grub · · Score: 1


    I thought Mandrake Club had folded a while back, /. had a story on it I thought. (quick search didn't turn it up) Am I imagining that?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The club? by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, you are. The club is alive and well. Which means I'll be firin' up the old Bittorrent client as soon as I get home tonight!

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    2. Re:The club? by Malor · · Score: 1

      This is from memory without double-checking, so don't treat this as 100% factual without double-checking it.

      Mandrake has been having financial trouble for some time, but they've been steadily improving. Basically, they wasted tons of money going after stupid stuff that the venture-capital type management wanted to do (mostly education), instead of spending their money where they actually made revenue.

      They declared bankruptcy late last year or early this year. With their debt payments suspended, they're "cash-flow positive" at the moment, and are hoping to get back to full normal operations (ie, paying down debt) by the end of the year.

      [end bad memory warning area]

      I'm a Silver member of their club and plan to continue my membership. I like their distro very much and feel it's worth supporting. I know that the Club is doing fairly well by them and they're pleased with the results, but the more members the better... it's not that expensive, gives you some nice little perks, and helps make sure a really good distro keeps evolving. I think of it like my local NPR station and like the EFF.. a small contribution by a lot of people can really make a difference.

      Your confusion may have arisen because of all the ill-wishing the Slashdot crowd was spouting when they were really hurting for money... "I hope they die, they deserve to", that kind of garbage. Fortunately, crap spewage and reality did not intersect.

      disclaimer: I have no connection to Mandrake other than my membership and a couple of installations of their distro.

    3. Re:The club? by grub · · Score: 1


      Your confusion may have arisen because of all the ill-wishing the Slashdot crowd was spouting when they were really hurting for money... "I hope they die, they deserve to", that kind of garbage.

      I'm a Free|OpenBSD user, you need to have a thick skin 'round these parts. ;) Thanks for the information, it helped jog my memory.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:The club? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'm a Free|OpenBSD user, you need to have a thick skin 'round these parts. ;) Thanks for the information, it helped jog my memory.

      Isn't BSD dying? I keep reading stories about it...

      Jokes aside, I was pretty pissed with slashdot's attitude towards Mandrake. I am generally irritated with it, besides. Mandrake is looking earnestly for a business model built on free software and they really do support the community, so all this player-hating is counterproductive. That said, i don't take it too personally. :)

      As a traditional freeloader, I am downloading the new Mandrake, which is available for download, right now. The only catch is, while it's available for download, it's not in ISO format. There is, apparently, a script to take the mirrored stuff and turn it into 3 iso images, and I intend to do that. When I get $60 together, I'll be joining the club. Assuming 9.2 shows itself to be more stable than 9.1, that is.

      I've been working with SuSE lately, and not liking this particular distribution (although they do have some really cool shit!). So I've just about made up my mind who I'm going to be working with. :) (For the record, I've been running mostly Mandrake already since 8.2)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  7. Streets? by bluegreenone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If by "streets", you mean the gilded hard drive pathways of MandrakeClub's paying members, then yes, Mandrake 9.2 has hit the streets. For the majority of the public you're talking a release in 1-2 weeks.

    1. Re:Streets? by joestar · · Score: 1

      > For the majority of the public you're talking a
      > release in 1-2 weeks.

      As mentionned in the post, the entire tree, including binary and sources is available publicly on a number of mirrors... (http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3)

    2. Re:Streets? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's a complete PITA if you want to burn a set of ISOs. Even using a recursive wget won't split it up into CD-sized chunks.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    3. Re:Streets? by nicsterrr · · Score: 1

      Well you could just join the club and you could download the isos straight away.

    4. Re:Streets? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's a complete PITA if you want to burn a set of ISOs. Even using a recursive wget won't split it up into CD-sized chunks.

      I'm gonna try running the MadeCD perl script, included in the download, that's supposed to make all 3 CDs.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:Streets? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Now why would I want to do that? I'm using gentoo :-) Seriously, if I can persuade my father to try linux on his P2 instead of an increasingly cranky old Windows install I probably will sign him up to the club - Mandrake is good. But I'm not going to do it until I know if he wants to keep the software, therefore I need the ISOs before I join the club. I'm not complaining about their system mind you, I think it's a good idea, just pointing out to the previous poster why having a tree available wasn't as useful as having the ISOs.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    6. Re:Streets? by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's right, I am better than you, and don't you forget it. Now get over here and polish the gilt on my hard drives before I have to smack you around.

      Remember, if you ain't looking pretty, I ain't living large and that ain't cool. You'll get your Mandrake in a couple of weeks :-)

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  8. Question for current Mandrake users by kikta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I was a Mandrake user for the both the 7.x and 8.x series. I liked it a lot, but I also had quite a few crashes (usually KDE apps). I know lots of other people have had the same gripe about Mandrake in the past, i.e. that it was very nice, but pretty unstable.

    Has Mandrake's stability improved in the 9.x series? I'd especially like to hear from folks who were testing the Cooker versions that became 9.2. Thanks.

    1. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having used 9.X for some time I think not. I liked Mandrake a lot, but it's instability was frustrating after RedHat. I eventually went back to RedHat (to prepare for the RHCE not for any real reason). I'll give Mandrake 9.2 a whirl, it's a nice system - but I too hope that 9.2 has ironed out a few of the X glitches (gdm was my bugbear).

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    2. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by nocomment · · Score: 1

      I never had any problems with stability, of course, I use gnome. My only gripe is because of the new club member deal, I have to try and do an ftp install for the first time ever ;-).

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    3. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux?? Unstable???

      Oh fuck! The world is ending, Slashdotters! ;-)

      --
      evil adrian
    4. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by joestar · · Score: 1

      > Has Mandrake's stability improved in the 9.x series?

      I never had problems with Mandrake's stability. At least since version 8.2.

    5. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by mamer-retrogamer · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandrake 9.1 as my primary environment for several months and have only had Konqueror seqfault on me a few times. Both times when I ran a ./configure script inside Konsole and had that directory opened in Konqueror. No other major problems to report.

      --
      Schrödinger's cat is not amused—maybe.
    6. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      Is the next version Mandrake NT?

    7. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Malor · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandrake a long time, but I didn't get "serious" about it until the 8.X series.

      I recall 8.0 and 8.1 as being a little flaky, but 8.2 as being very solid. I had TONS of problems when I upgraded to 9.0... not because of the distro itself, but because everything ELSE broke. They did some upgrade ( to glibc maybe?) that broke almost all the RPMs I tried from earlier versions. I was able to get around it in many cases by rebuilding source RPMS, but it was still painful. I should have waited longer.

      I'm presently on 9.1, and am happy with it. I use the High Performance Liquid theme (you can get it in the Penguin Liberation Front rpms) on KDE. I get an occasional Konqueror segfault, probably about twice a week, but other than that it's been very stable. I'm using it on a P4 1.8, Intel chipset, GF4MX440, Nvidia binary drivers.

      My home Linux machine has had occasional lockups of X (machine still up, X frozen), which seem related to my switchbox. I am of the belief that the lockups aren't Mandrake's fault...I'm pretty sure it's the Nvidia drivers. I haven't had the problems with the most recent version, but I also haven't been using the machine very much for the last few weeks, so I'm not sure it's fixed yet. That machine is an Athlon 1900+ on an Asus A7V333, GeForce Ti4200.

      On the whole, I'd call it about equivalently stable to XP, maybe a little less. The kernel itself, of course, is almost uncrashable, but X is a little more fragile than I'd like.

    8. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by JBv · · Score: 1

      Stability may be a hardware problem.

      I've used mdk 9 series intensively using KDE (textstar rpms) as my desktop and had no major issues. I was using my pc (duron + GF4200) for 10+ hours of number crunching, compilations, browsing, pdf reading, open office and quake3/wolfenstein.

      KDE has improved considerably since the 2.x series, which may be what you are complaining about.

    9. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      It was a joke, I know what Linux is, how it works, how it is distributed, about the GPL, how SCO and Micro$oft are evil, etc. etc.

      Just laugh. OK?

      --
      evil adrian
    10. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I used Mandrake through 6.x to 8.x and I thought it was pretty stable using it for years it as a very solid and dependable server.


      But as a desktop and as a demonstration of usability it sucks bigtime. In the same 6-8 time period I thought the UI got increasingly bad becoming nearly unusable by the end. I picked up 9.1 and my opinion hasn't changed much. They still ship a nearly generic KDE with a bunch of slapdash tools with the result that the desktop looks like a cluttered mess.


      Usability is definitely Mandrake's weak spot. It's a shame because otherwise it is pretty solid.

    11. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by nicsterrr · · Score: 1

      The only problems I've had (very occasional lockups) started after I installed the nvidia drivers. Shame really, since I might as well not have a fast graphics card if I use the xfree nvidia driver.

    12. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      So I was a Mandrake user for the both the 7.x and 8.x series. I liked it a lot, but I also had quite a few crashes (usually KDE apps). I know lots of other people have had the same gripe about Mandrake in the past, i.e. that it was very nice, but pretty unstable.

      Ive been using Mandrake on my servers and desktop for awhile now. My servers are SMP P2 and P3s, and no problem what so ever. Mandrake even had updates for security holes that urpmi took care of.

      I even use cooker on my main desktop (i wanted to test), and that has had problems, but mostly with me tinkering around, and recompiling some src.rpm's. But stock RPM's have been nothing but solid.

    13. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Pembers · · Score: 1

      (Posting this from Mozilla 1.3 on Mandrake 9.1...)

      I've been using Mandrake as my main OS at home for maybe a year and a half now. A couple of applications (Mozilla and KPPP are the main culprits) tend to hang or become unresponsive after they've been running for a few weeks, but that's my only real complaint with it. I wouldn't describe Mandrake as unstable. I've only ever once managed to crash the desktop (on 8.2), and I've never had a kernel panic.

      I use Gnome rather than KDE, so I don't know if the latter is more problematic. I was under the impression that KDE was the default environment on Mandrake, so I would've expected them to put more effort into making it work properly.

    14. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Mimir · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have to try and do an ftp install for the first time ever

      Don't. It doesn't work. Tried it 6 times last night (mirror on ftp.uninett.no was already available), but the perl-install process loops on downloading package lists. It can't find hdlist2.cz which is supposed to cover media 3. I was even stupid enough to fry my root partition in an attempt at clean install when upgrade didn't work (separate /home partition. Nothing lost but time). Now I'm back to using RH9 with XD2. It's stable and has gorgeous font rendering. Sub-pixel hinting really works on my laptop (Thinkpad A31p), but it tends to crash when I wake it from suspend. Which sucks, cause I hate having to logout when leaving for/from work.

    15. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by nocomment · · Score: 1

      Don't. It doesn't work.

      Well I'll be a monkey's uncle, it surely doesn't work. I've been trying all morning and nothin'! It fails shortly after disconnecting life support systems...*sigh*

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    16. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by BigRedFish · · Score: 1

      First thing, perspective and disclosure: I installed Mandrake 9.1 in early May I think, it worked so well that June 16 was my 'Windependence Day'[*] when I fdisked my NT4 partition (I never drank the 2K/XP Kool-Aid) and went pure Mandrake. Since then, it's been pretty smooth, does everything I need my home box to do. Things get better each release - in 6 months I've already seen substantial improvement. I'll live with a few glitches here and there, given that they get fixed. And my dual-processor (suck my clit, Darl) P3-500 box practically screams in normal use under 'Drake, and will continue to do so in the future, while Win2K is sluggish at best and XP would be molasses in January (July for those down under) unless I bought a new mobo. And then I'd have to call and get permission. Fsck that.

      'Drake does have some UI glitches (kernel's been quite solid though). Same for every other GUI-based OS I've ever used, and neither Windows nor pre-X MacOS can claim the low-level stability. In six months of using 'Drake 9.1, the occasional 'Crash' has meant a simple SIGSEV dialog with no spillover effects, system stays up no harm no foul. Thanks to *nix process model, no memory leakage either. A full system lock-up is unheard of, nigh unimaginable now that I understand how this thing works.

      That said, here's my list:

      Attempting to play LBreakout full-screen while listening to a CD ends up with me opening a console as root, to kill my login and restart the X server, as that hangs KDE up but good. It's LBreakout's fault - after releasing the sound system, it checks to see if there are any sound processes remaining and assumes it failed if there are, so it just hangs there waiting for the CD to finally play out. Someday I gotta get the source code and fix that; the fact that I can speaks volumes about why OSS rocks. [The bug that I can't use my 'puter 'cause my roommate is on my machine playing Frozen Bubble is not a Mandrake issue.]

      The bug that really keeps getting me is Konq's Find function - it seems that upon completing a search, it enables the 'back' button. If the search was the first thing you did, there's no previous page to go back to so it SIGSEV's if you hit 'back.' Looks like a null pointer deref. Hardly a killer; just annoying, given how natural it is to hit the back button. If I SIGSEV, odds are I just did the above. I think this has been fixed in the newer KDE release though?

      What else? Noatun rarely ever works, I just use it to test the KDE crash handler. But XMMS, K3B, and KsCD all work fine so I don't miss it, and 'real-world' interfaces suck rocks anyway. If my CD player looks like a seashell I can't find the Play button.

      KDev annoys because it says it wants autoconf 2.5, then installing that forces me to uninstall KDev, defeating the purpose. Hope they fixed THAT; I'm having to write C programs in Kate and it's not a happy situation - good thing I learned to program before the 'Hover Help' era or I'd be so lost...

      MCC still has a few dialogs that don't seem to do anything (setting the bootsplash and KDM themes, for example).

      'Drake is still a terrific beginner distro though, if you just browse and check email you won't hit most of the above, and its firewall is really good so you won't get r00ted while you're learning. OOo and Moz have never done me wrong. KOffice isn't my thing but it seems to work fine for my purposes. I don't do Palm-sync or Organizers so can't speak to those. Unless you're prepared to lay out for a new OSX Mac, I'd recommend it to a n00b over anything else.

      [*] Windependence Day: Not counting the first time I kicked MS off my system, circa 1990, thanks to DR-DOS, QEMM, and DesqView. But we all know the rest of that story. Too bad OS/2 had such unrealistic hardware requirements for so long.

    17. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Has Mandrake's stability improved in the 9.x series? I'd especially like to hear from folks who were testing the Cooker versions that became 9.2. Thanks.

      YES

      As long as you don't install the Flash plugin, that is. The Flash plugin for Mozilla, for some reason, periodically locks up Mozilla in such a way that everytime you click in the address bar, Mozilla locks. xkill is the way to deal with it, but it doesn't fix it, just gets the window out of your way. Rebooting makes the problem go away, until you hit another page using flash that uses that buggy flash plugin. It's not actually Mandrake's fault the flash plugin is buggy.

      Anyway, my biggest complaints with 8.2 went away in 9.0, and I've been pretty satisfied with them since then. Except for that flash part, which I blamed on Mandrake until I spent some time with it and figured it out. Now I'm happy again. :) (I should also add that I'm not what you're looking for, I haven't tested any flavor of 9.2, just 9.1. I expect 9.2 to be an improvement, of course)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    18. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Don't you just hate it when that happens? I swear it happens to me like twice a week.

      I wish people wouldn't run around forums looking for ways to show off their knowledge.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    19. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      I've got three cooker (well, 9.2 as of today) desktop/server systems, a 9.0 server, and a 9.1 desktop/server. All are generally rock-solid, with the exception of the 9.1 system (naturally the most important). Of course, that system has been severely overheated to the point of panic shutdown quite a few times, so I tend to chalk up flakiness to its abused little chip. Importance being relative of course :-)

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    20. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      The bug that I can't use my 'puter 'cause my roommate is on my machine playing Frozen Bubble is not a Mandrake issue.]

      True, but for a small additional investment, smaller than the price of a computer, you can fix that bug. Just another monitor, keyboard, and mouse. (You might have to go usb for the keyboard and mouse, if you haven't already)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    21. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Same here. Just got over a bout with it. Ended up going back to the nv (xfree86) driver and doing without the OpenGL for the moment. If this next version is not more stable, I'll be trying Gentoo next. Hell, I might switch just for the change, but I'll download and burn the mdk9.2 all the same.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    22. Re:Question for current Mandrake users by PurpleWizard · · Score: 1
      I've been using Mandrake 9.x since each has become available (and others before that). One release had a habit of sometimes kicking me out and back to the log in (under X).

      9.1 has been utterly trouble free.

  9. Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ripper: "Mandrake, have you ever seen a Commie use Windows?"

    Mandrake: "No, Jack. I can't say that I have."

    Ripper: "Linux. That's what they use, isn't it? Never Windows?"

    Mandrake: "Well, I believe that's what they use, Jack. Yes."

    Ripper: "On no account will a Commie use Windows? And not without good reason?"

    Mandrake: "I don't quite see what you're getting at, Jack."

    Ripper: "Windows. That's what I'm getting at. Windows, Mandrake. Windows is the source of our economy. Seven-tenths of the earth's economy depends on Windows. Why, do you realize that 95% of all computer users own or use Windows?"

    Mandrake: "Odd."

    Ripper: "And as human beings, you and I need fresh, regular Windows updates to replenish our precious Intel-based applications."

    Mandrake: "Yes."

    Ripper: "Are you beginning to understand?"

    Mandrake: "Yes."

    Ripper: "Mandrake. Mandrake, have you ever wondered why I use only Windows NT, or Windows XP, and only pure closed-source software?"

    Mandrake: "Well, it did occur to me, Jack, yes."

    Ripper: "Have you ever heard of a thing called the GPL, the GPL license?"

    Mandrake: "Yes, I have heard of that, Jack, yes."

    Ripper: "Well, do you know what it is?"

    Mandrake: "No."

    Ripper: "Do you realize that the GPL is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Commie plot we have ever had to face?"

    1. Re:Mandrake by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      1 Full tank of gas
      It's dark outside and we're wearing sunglasses.

      Hit it!

    2. Re:Mandrake by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      Eh, Marx and Engels used ink, if you use ink, or own anything with ink in it, you are potentially a commie too. Scribblers of the world, unite!

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    3. Re:Mandrake by BigRedFish · · Score: 1

      It's 106 miles to Chicago; we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarattes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses.

      Never mind that, it's one win to the Series, we've got a full tank of Sosa, half a pack of Dusty Baker, it's October, and we ain't been there since 1945. GO CUBBIES!!!

  10. download rate by bluegreenone · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI I'm getting an average of about 20KB/sec with bittorrent. Certainly not lighting fast. Peak has been about 140KB/sec, low around 5KB/sec. Estimated total time about 17 hours.

    1. Re:download rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Want to post a copy of the .torrent? I have a fast pipe (T3/DS3) at my disposal. The more people that are connected, the faster things'll move.

    2. Re:download rate by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "FYI I'm getting an average of about 20KB/sec with bittorrent. Certainly not lighting fast. Peak has been about 140KB/sec, low around 5KB/sec. Estimated total time about 17 hours."

      Never trust a torrent's estimated download time. Bittorrent is always looking for a better host to download from. I've seen a torrent jump from 5 K/s to 320 K/s in the space of 30 seconds. And I've seen the reverse happen as well (probably because the person with a huge connection dropped from the torrent.)

      Add that to the fact that more people will be joining the torrent and the fact that more people = faster downloads, I expec that your transfer will take much less than 17h.

    3. Re:download rate by ameoba · · Score: 1

      What kind of upstream can you contribute to the torrent? Especially when a lot of people are joining (such as when slashdot posts it), there's not a lot of 'spare' bandwidth available so you'll be limited by your upstream contribution.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:download rate by bluegreenone · · Score: 1

      I am consistently providing around 30-40 KB/s. Usually I am uploading more than downloading.

    5. Re:download rate by Kelz · · Score: 1

      I havent gotten over 8KB/sec in a couple months. Anyone know what is going on here? (and no you trolls I'm not using dialup or ISDN)

    6. Re:download rate by cyt0plas · · Score: 1

      Not really, they filter their tracker by IP. You could open the torrent, you just couldn't connect.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    7. Re:download rate by Macguyvok · · Score: 1

      I'm getting 2 k/s. This is rediculous... Any one else having this issue? I mean, I woulda thought there would eb plenty of people downloading.. and I could get a decent connection.... max upload seems to be about 7 k/s.... but I'm on a T-1 line... with no bandwidth limitations...So, whats up here guys?

      --
      --Mac "Nine point eight meters per second squared: The Best Damn Windows Accelerator, Ever."
  11. "Transparent" proxies by javilon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of the members of Mandrake Club can't get the ISOs because they are behind "transparent" proxies set up by their ISPs. The reason is that MandrakeSoft is using the user's IP to allow the bittorrent download, but for people behind this proxies MandrakeSoft sees the proxie's address instead of the user's address and doesn't authorize the use of the bittorrent tracker.

    This is happening to anyone using Spain's Telefonica ADSL. This covers almost everyone in Spain.

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    1. Re:"Transparent" proxies by Thing+1 · · Score: 1, Informative
      Another thing about BitTorrent: if you're using a DSL Router/firewall, which gives DHCP addresses to your machines of the form "192.168.x.x" then your IP address is internal-only; the IP address that machines on the internet think you're coming from is actually the router's IP address.

      So in order to get BitTorrent working at decent speeds, you need to forward a few ports (which means you can only have BitTorrent at decent speeds on one of your machines -- someone please correct me if there's a better way to do it).

      On my router, a Linksys BEFRS41, it's on the "Forwarding" tab, and I have just one rule set: ports 6881 through 6889 are forwarded to my main machine, both UDP and TCP.

      That one little change brought my BT speeds from an average of 10-20 kBps to 60-80 kBps (the most this DSL line can handle; at another location I had cable and routinely got 200 kBps).

      Hope this helps some of you out there!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:"Transparent" proxies by psychofox · · Score: 1

      I always thought a transparent proxy was exactly that. Transparent.

      A transparent proxy sits in between requests to that the target server, the request appears to be coming from the original users IP. It is able to capture requests for objects which it is has already cached and return them directly instead of hitting the target. Other than that it should be transparent, to the extent that it should be difficult for you to even detect...

      It sounds like what you have is a good old fashioned proxy. Not a transparent one.. Unlucky..

    3. Re:"Transparent" proxies by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Usually a transparent proxy has to understand the protocols it is proxying... If the proxy doesn't speak BitTorrent, it won't work.

    4. Re:"Transparent" proxies by CrzyLune · · Score: 1

      Short answer: Use the --ip x.x.x.x option Long answer: My internal network uses the private ip space of 192.168.1.0/24. The firewall/router NATs the private IPs to a single IP address (for DSL users this may be dynamically assigned each time). We have a very tight firewall so I had to allow new connections out on 6969 and all connections on 6881-6889. New connections to the public IP address had to be forwarded to the private computer running bittorrent. Finally, when running btdownloadcurses.py I had to specify --ip x.x.x.x where x.x.x.x is the public IP address everyone else sees. Else, BT used my private IP which doesn't do anyone any good. btdownloadcurses.py --ip pub.lic.ip.add --minport 6881 --maxport 6889 --max_upload_rate 100 my.torrent The transparent proxy could cause you troubles if the IP is not the same as your router IP. Often I check for transparent IP servers by going to http://www.grc.com. Steve Gibson has the useful ShieldsUp! tool that among other things probes your common ports. It will tell you exactly what IP address it sees you surfing with. If it is different than your router or your PC than there may be a proxy between you an grc.com. How do you bypass a transparent proxy you don't control?

    5. Re:"Transparent" proxies by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      tunnel to an outside server.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:"Transparent" proxies by cyt0plas · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not entirely correct. Transparent proxies usually do little more than hijack port 80. As such, outgoing connections will come from the IP of the proxy. If mandrakesoft is using IPs, the user gets the torrent, and the proxy's IP would be authorized, but when the client directly connects (from it's IP, not the proxies), it would fail.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    7. Re:"Transparent" proxies by isdnip · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never actually used BitTorrent before, and it was not that easy to get going -- the d*mned dependency tree for wxWindows, or something like that, couldn't resolve until I picked the *right* package to install, whose mirrors were okay, and then it updated 17 packages, including TuxRacer fercripesake, but finally it was in. Then the curses version, but not the gui, worked, and started the download.

      I've got a cable modem and typically ftp at about 150-200 kbyte/sec. I was only getting 20k down, while feeding about 25k up! Ugh. So I come to Slashdot to look at the gripefest. I see Thing 1's note. I go into my Netgear (ZyXel in disguise) router and turn on port forwarding for 6881 to 6889. In seconds, the download rate rises to about 100 kbyte/s! (It's around 135k now.) Projected time falls from 48H to 6H!

      I don't understand how BitTorrent works or how it kinda sorta works but only slowly when port forwarding is off. But I do appreciate Thing 1's note, and would moderate it up if I had mod privs today. Thanks!

    8. Re:"Transparent" proxies by bconway · · Score: 1

      Torrents are available here: http://ihaveapenguin.servemp3.com/draketorrents/.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    9. Re:"Transparent" proxies by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the kind words. I had the exact same experience -- I was downloading a BitTorrent at the time and it shot up immediately.

      Someone gave me an Overrated for trying to help. Oh well, no good deed goes unpunished, right? ;-/

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  12. Re:Suse Linux 9 by ahillen · · Score: 1

    Suse Linux 9 hit the streets yesterday

    No. It's 15th Oct. in Germany and 24th elsewhere (or at least in the US, according to suse.com)

  13. Somewhat offtopic, but useful? by linux_warp · · Score: 1

    This isn't exactly mandrake related, but Fedora test3 was also released. The torrent link is here

    Should have OO 1.1, kernel 2.4.22, gnome 2.4 and some other fun stuff

    1. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but useful? by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      From the same site, the torrent for sources

      Jonah Hex

  14. RC2 is more stable than 9.1, in my experience by Idou · · Score: 1

    It also got rid of a strange bug that Mozilla on 9.1 had on rendering some Japanese pages (maybe UTF related?).

    It seems much faster and stable, overall. Also, OpenOffice 1.1 on totally ROCKS! (much faster! Handles Japanese perfectly!).9.2

    I would hang out and tell you more, but I am in the process of installing bittorrent's gui so that I can install 9.2 from the website.

    Later!

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:RC2 is more stable than 9.1, in my experience by offpath3 · · Score: 1

      It works better on japanese? _Sweet_! That's my one main gripe with 9.1. I will definitely be installing 9.2 very soon.

    2. Re:RC2 is more stable than 9.1, in my experience by Idou · · Score: 1

      Major improvement on Japanese. Especially_with_OO! I was very, very impressed.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  15. Re:Commie bullshit by xutopia · · Score: 1
    I guess now I want to be a commie too. Your rational is that someone should be allowed to profit from forcing me to use something. Your economy sucks shit anyways.

    You have the most deficit in the history of the known universe and that M$ money is not going to fix that. Soon you'll not be able to afford buying Windows and you'll need yet another loan to afford it, or get with Linux.

  16. DVD Playback? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The release page says that the Discovery Pack provides DVD playback! How can they do this without distributing something (illegaly) equivalent to DeCSS? Does it have a closed-source and commercial DVD player software?

    1. Re:DVD Playback? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      CSS is an optional encryption on DVDs, if a DVD isnt encrypted, you can play it back.

      This excludes virtually every hollywood release, of course. But arent we boycotting them anyways, to make them bow to the mighty spending power of the unemployed IT worker?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:DVD Playback? by ronlamb · · Score: 1

      Those of us in America dislike it as much as you, although to be fair it has less to do with countries than with greedy corporations.

      It looks like the those of you in Europe will have the EUCD (EU Copyright Directive), also known as Euro-DCMA. The vote was pushed till November, but I bet it will pass.

      One reason I think the studios don't want non
      "approved" versions is because the Linux versions allow you to skip the menu's and advertisements.

      A few DVD's I rented had the controls locked so you couldn't skip past or fast forward through the advertisements.

    3. Re:DVD Playback? by BigRedFish · · Score: 1

      In DMCA countries, the CSS-related codecs are deleted from the distro; in other countries they have the complete package. Something to think about when choosing a mirror. By that I mean you wouldn't want to accidentally break the law, of course.

  17. Upgrade by wazzzup · · Score: 1

    So I just days ago, got my dad off of Windows and onto Linux by installing Mandrake 9.1 He got tired of the virii and security updates from Microsoft, the ad-aware spyware removal updates and the Norton AntiVirus updates when all he does is use the net to retrieve email.

    Is there a simple way to upgrade or do I have to download the ISO's and reinstall (probably won't if that's the case)? I use OS X at home so I'm not sure how to upgrade a Linux box.

    1. Re:Upgrade by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      If it aint broke, don't fix it.

      One of the beauties of linux is that you aren't force fed an update patch when you don't want one. If everything is working, you might just want to check for critical updates of programs you are runnning, and be sure to disable services you are not running.

    2. Re:Upgrade by kcb93x · · Score: 1

      Run the next set of software (9.2 in this case) and when it asks if you want to do a fresh install or an upgrade, choose an upgrade.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Upgrade by waffle+zero · · Score: 1

      You have to update the package repository so that it points to new 9.2 sources and then run

      urpmi --auto-select --force
      in a terminal as root. Wait a couple days for Easy Urpmi to get a list compiled for 9.2.
    4. Re:Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Urpmi is a beautiful thing ;)
      If you're using mandrake, learn to use urpmi. If you set it up as described at http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon (wait for them to get 9.2 mirrors up), then you can, for instance, say
      "urpmi gaim" to download and install or updgrade gaim. (in the console as root.) It also gets any dependencies. ;)
      "urpmi mozilla-firebird" installs mozilla firebird.
      "urpmi tuxracer" installs the tuxracer game.
      See the pattern? ;)
      If you're not sure of the package name, you can search with "urpmi -y name", which will give you a list of related packages.
      To uninstall something, do "urpme package."
      And to upgrade everything, do "urpmi --auto-select", hit yes a couple of times and give it a while.

    5. Re:Upgrade by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      Is there a simple way to upgrade or do I have to download the ISO's and reinstall (probably won't if that's the case)?

      You can download the ISOs, start the install program, and odds are that you will see an option to upgrade an existing installation. That will probably work (back up /etc and /home before you do it, of course).

      When I was using RPM-based distributions, I found that was the only way that I could upgrade. Trying to get the latest and greatest any other way always lead, sooner or later but always before I was up-to-date, into dependency hell.

      I've dealt with this by using Debian, and now I am always up-to-date. Now that Testing has security updates, I'm using bleeding edge software again, too, but I'm not sure that's such a big deal as I thought, back when I was using Stable.

    6. Re:Upgrade by jejones · · Score: 1

      If he uses OpenOffice at all, he will want 9.2, which has OpenOffice 1.1. After the 1.0.x routine of

      click on the OO button
      go have a cup of $BEVERAGE
      edit document

      the very quick startup of OO 1.1 is a GREAT relief.

    7. Re:Upgrade by Wokan · · Score: 1

      I've done URPMI updates to Mandrake since 7.2 and I've *never* had to use --force.

      I do prefer "urpmi --auto-select -M -c -p"

    8. Re:Upgrade by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > You can download the ISOs, start the install
      > program, and odds are that you will see an
      > option to upgrade an existing installation.

      If you do the install without formatting the partition containing /home, both user documents and user settings should be preserved. It was really neat when I recently reinstalled Mandrake and all my KDE settings were preserved. ^_^

      > When I was using RPM-based distributions, I
      > found that was the only way that I could
      > upgrade. Trying to get the latest and greatest
      > any other way always lead, sooner or later but
      > always before I was up-to-date, into dependency
      > hell.

      Dependency hell hasn't been a problem with me ever since I started using urpmi, Mandrake's automated do-everything rpm installer. There are a couple little problems, and I confess that I wasn't able to *completely* upgrade from Mandrake 9.1RC2 to Mandrake 9.2 with urpmi, but there were no dependency problems. Other than the fact that upgrading the thousands of apps required to upgrade, there happened to be one app (called "indexhtml", I think) that simply happened to coredump on install. Bummer, that. But I actually got it to the point where it was saying "Welcome to Mandrake 9.2" at started before I made the mistake to auto-installing everything from Texstar (doh!).

      But I haven't had a serious dependency problem in Mandrake 9.x, ever. My FreeBSD server, though, was a different thing. :p

      --
      -JC

    9. Re:Upgrade by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > Other than the fact that upgrading the thousands
      > of apps required to upgrade, there happened to be one app

      I meant to say "Other than the fact that upgrading the thousands of apps required to upgrade took a subjective eternity, there happened to be one app

    10. Re:Upgrade by fcrozat · · Score: 1

      This is STUPID !!

      Do NOT use --force on urpmi..

      urpmi --auto-select is enough to update older Mandrake distros to 9.2

      Best way is to run :
      urpmi urpmi
      urpmi --auto-select
      urpmi kernel

  18. cool by matchboy · · Score: 1

    What would Lady Death Maggot do though? She uses Mandrake

    --

    Robby Russell
    PLANET ARGON
    Robby on Rails
  19. Features? by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    One of the features that they cite is "File names can now be intuitively renamed", referring to clicking on the name slowly, ala Windows. Was right click -> Rename not intuitive enough?

    1. Re:Features? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Was right click -> Rename not intuitive enough?

      It works for me! It's the Windows way that I abhor. It's damned annoying if you don't double click at the right speed.

      What's the right click for in KDE (and Windows)? To manipulate the object. Renaming is a form of manipulation, as it delete, copy, and editing properties. Windows has chosen to make rename the default manipulation, and to access it with the left (action) button. What if it had chosen something else? What if every time you double clicked too slowly it added the icon to your bookmarks?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:Features? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      F2 always did me fine in 9.1, and I agree with those who say they'd rather not rename things when they misjudge the click speed.

      Having said that, we're splitting hairs here a little bit, aren't we?

    3. Re:Features? by agm · · Score: 1

      I have always found that F2 is the quickest way to rename files. Instant response, no right clicking and no waiting for a "slow click".

  20. Re:i586 by Gunfighter · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want optimized, install gentoo instead. Contrary to popular belief, you don't actually have to compile everything. If you download the CDs for your architecture, you'll find that the included binary packages are compiled for your architecture alerady.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  21. Re:Spyware? by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You make technology decisions based on vague rememberings of something that you can't find evidence of?

    Maybe you're thinking of the ads displayed during the install process rather than spyware? That's a pretty hefty accusation to be tossing around, even in a vaguely-worded statement such as yours.

  22. never one crash by deathcow · · Score: 1

    Must be those big glitzy desktops? We build two flavors of Mandrake 9.1 boxes where I work --

    Flavor #1 (monitoring station) has 8 monitors running IceWM, all 8 monitors peppered with X apps.

    Flavor #2 (server) are rack mounted and only accessed via VNC servers. These boxes are LAMP setups and run Perl apps continuously.

    Our uptimes reach 100 days easily, and then we have to reboot for power cord moves, rack changes, stupid stuff like that. We've never had to reboot a Mandrake 9.1 box in either of these configurations due to something wigging out.

    Sounds like its dry-rot in your glitz factor.

    1. Re:never one crash by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      You use Madrake for mission critical servers? Why did you chose Mandrake over Debian or Redhat, or any other distro for that matter? Just curious..

    2. Re:never one crash by hitmark · · Score: 1

      alltho i dont have any fact to back this up i think that 90-99% of the unstable packages are client software, not servers. so while the users will see crashes servers will not...

      in fact as i think about it, the only time i have heard of mandrake actualy putting in known unstable software (as in rc or similar) with any major effect was when 8.1 or something got shipped to wal-mart with a kde rc. the insident was wal-marts fault as the release washappening in the christmas timeframe. the isos had the kde stable that came out a bit later and the wal-mart boxes had contact info for getting free upgrades to kde stable if you didnt have access to the net...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:never one crash by alienw · · Score: 1

      The server-side stuff is all reasonably stable. Mandrake also does some nice optimizations that other distros don't.

    4. Re:never one crash by insensitive+claude · · Score: 1

      They do put out a separate distribution for the server arena. Sounds like it uses X for the install routine, but after that it's your basic stable Linux server.

    5. Re:never one crash by deathcow · · Score: 1

      Because we run many programs in the foreground of X terminals and watch their performance through those X terms.

      VNC makes a nice place to keep multiple X terms up with a bunch of apps running.

  23. Network install for the cheap by waffle+zero · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've had success installing Mandrake using the network install floppy. Here are some simple instructions, but the gist is that you download the network.img and note the location of a rpm mirror for when it asks you. It downloads a 45mb cramfs image and uncompresses it to memory so you should ideally have 90+mb of ram, or mount a swap partition from one of the other terminals.

    I would recommend doing a very minimal install consisting of nothing but GNOME or KDE and any servers you wish to run. Then after the install, use urpmi to install any other packages. With 9.1 I would get lynx and use it to grab a list of mirrors from Easy Urpmi. I recommend using Texstar's repository whenever he starts packaging for 9.2. The page currently only has 9.1 and earlier sources, but expect people pestering him from this link to illicit an update.

    1. Re:Network install for the cheap by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 1

      Instead of depending on the mirror list on the Plf site, you could install and run urpmi.setup, with which you can set up media for urpmi, like Main, Contrib, PLF and Jpackage. Not sure if there are already 9.2 mirrors for these media though.
      Btw, I heard that not all the mirrors have their trees fully synced yet, so a minimal install with basic gui, urpmi and urpmi.setup might be a good idea indeed.

      --
      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    2. Re:Network install for the cheap by horati0 · · Score: 1

      All the mirrors I've tried so far appear not to have the RPMS2 directory synched yet, which causes an error when doing a network install. The installer's 'hdlists' source file is telling it that RPMS2 is there but when the program tries to access it, the folder is not there and the installer dies. Doh.

      --
      The neutrality of this sig is disputed.
  24. 9.1 was a huge leap in usability by Azureflare · · Score: 1

    I never used 7.x and 8.x, so I can't comment on that, but I Started with 9.0. 9.0 was usable, but barely; the MCC was crufty and a lot of it was generally crufty. When I used 9.1, that all changed; many of the wizards actually WORKED, and I was able to actually use everything for long periods of time without crashes. I'm using 9.2RC2 ATM, 9.2 final is downloading via bittorrent, and I have to say Mandrake has reached a level of refinement with 9.2. I upgraded from 9.1->9.2RC2, so I Don't know how the install process sets up a default install, but I will be trying it out on a new HD. I have been very happy with Mandrake since 9.1, and the club membership has been worth it (I love the test packages =)). However, I'm sure other distros will be fine for most people. Mandrake is nice because it is very usable now. Also, Gnome 2.4 is sooo much better than gnome 2.2, which helps us gnome users out quite a bit.

  25. POE OPE by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    You'll have to answer to the coca-cola bottling company for that!

  26. Now 100% Free Software, cool by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

    From: http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/9.2/features/#13

    Since Netscape and the last few remaining proprietary applications have been removed, Mandrake Linux 9.2 is a "100% Free Software" product. This means that everyone is granted the right to access the sources, modify and redistribute the software. This also means that Mandrake Linux 9.2 can be deployed on as many machines as desired.

  27. Why oh why is the user interface still so stale? by shibbie · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why do the default UI's in Linux distro look so Windows 95? Why do they have to look all the same despite Redhats and Mandrake's custom themes? I know you can have funky bells and whistles if you want to customize but if you look at Windows XP out of the box it STANDS OUT and YELLS "I'm different!" (from previous versions of Windows). By the time we get up to spec on Windows XP's curved UI as a default UI, Longhorn will be about with its 3D user interface and Linux will be sporting the oh so old XP like GUI. What we need is a default skin or theme that is round like Aqua, that doesn't have an annoting "K" or footprint as the Start button. IANAD (Designer) but square start menus and frames just don't cut it anymore. Let INNOVATE rather than copy, I know there are some fantastic web designers out there that can do wonders with GIMP (etc) and plain HTML. Surely a UI isn't much more difficult?

  28. Re:Spyware? by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    You make technology decisions based on vague rememberings of something that you can't find evidence of?

    Actually, i stopped using Mandrake some years ago due to its performance and the way it is laid out. I'm just not a RH or Mandrake person. Sorry.

    But the idea of being served by ads in *any* part of the process turns me cold on ever looking at them again when i have so many other options, some of which serve my purposes quite well.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  29. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    I use the command prompt, you insensitive clod.

  30. I've come to the conclusion... by Sean+isn't+Shawn · · Score: 1

    that linux is a fourth level language.

  31. RPMS have been mirrored already by Aggrajag · · Score: 1

    At least here in Europe. Going to upgrade MDK 9.1 using ftp as soon as I get home.

    1. Re:RPMS have been mirrored already by Aggrajag · · Score: 1

      One that seems to have a complete kit: ftp://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/pub/linux/Mandrake/9.2/i 586/

  32. Re:Re:Commie bullshit by mavenguy · · Score: 1

    I guess your sarcasm sensor is malfunctioning.

  33. not to burn karma on grammar bitchiness or anythin by Ravagin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Mandrake Club members get full access to 9.2 ISOs (through BitTorrent), as well as... all 9.2 contributors and translators

    So if I join the club I get access to all the contributors and translators? Like, I can make them mow my lawn and stuff?

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

  34. What about CDROM? by bluegreenone · · Score: 1

    Ah, but how about a CDROM network install image? Why don't they release that when fewer and fewer people still use floppies? Any way to burn the network.img to CD and boot from that?

  35. Looking forward to 10.0 by matchboy · · Score: 1

    Mandrake is nice and all..but not ideal for servers. Lady Death Maggot poll! Make her do evil stuff on her webcam.

    --

    Robby Russell
    PLANET ARGON
    Robby on Rails
    1. Re:Looking forward to 10.0 by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      I dare you to post something without spamming the Lady Death Maggot site, twatshoe.

  36. Ads in Mandrake 9.2 by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They addressed this already.
    It seems kind of slow due to slashdotting.

    On a side note, this time the slashdot sensationalism really disapointed me. I've been eagerly checking Mandrake's site for a while now, I've got a computer that's waiting to have 9.2 installed on it. I'm waiting for the free download, then as soon as I'm sure I like it, I'll run out to buy a copy. Does anyone know if Best Buy will carry this one? I saw them with an older version years back.

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  37. Re:i586 by sewagemaster · · Score: 1


    i'm using debian... is there anything you would suggest that would make me want to switch to gentoo, other than an optimized/lean system?

  38. Full Text... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, Mandrake's site is running really slow, and I still have the window opened, so here's the text of their press statement:

    A controversy has erupted today in the Linux community about the upcoming Mandrake Linux 9.2 and advertizing. Although the overall reaction from the community is mostly positive, a few people don't seem to be happy about having advertizing in Mandrake 9.2. We'd like to explain briefly why we have done this and why you shouldn't worry.

    0) There won't be any ad in the screensavers in Mandrake 9.2

    There will be one paid-ad in the installation procedure, and a few paid-links in bookmarks.

    1) Ads are selected and won't be intrusive.

    Our advertizing plan is only offered to MandrakeSoft partners - we select only ads that make sense as complementary Linux solutions. Additionally, ads won't be intrusive (no pop-up windows) and can be removed easily.

    2) There have been ads in Mandrake Linux for years.

    Maybe you didn't notice it, but in the installation procedure and in browser's bookmarks, there have been many links to Mandrake products, the GNU project, many Open Source projects and so on. In Mandrake 9.1 there was the first "commercial" link to a technical book content provider. Nobody was annoyed, we didn't get any feedback about that.

    3) Free Software and business model.

    As we are firmly committed to Open Source/Free Software, we want to keep on exploring business models that are compatible with this spirit.

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  39. Re:all i want to know by Urkki · · Score: 1

    Wait. You can't use Kazaa for this! It's legal to distribute it almost any way you want, so any P2P software is clearly wrong way here.

  40. Slashdot also bans spain :( by Null-A · · Score: 1

    Yep, I am tired of getting the dreaded pink slashdot screen (DPSS), after hitting several times F5 it loads the page correctly (weirdly developers.slashdot.org is the hardest to bypass)
    Why /. bans spain?
    Yep I know my evil "isp" hijacked the internet and put a transparent firewall but I CANT switch "isp" there is only one "real" adsl provider in spain Telefonica, the other ones are resellers of the same product. /. ban on spain lame
    (I tried once emailing /., one of the addresses listed in the DPSS, but to no avail , the /. admin want me to contact my adsl proxy administrator and from there the Telefonica "techies" (another joke) and /. admin resolve the matter, what a JOKE any one in Spain will LOL at that thought, its impossible to talk to any one in Telefonica, they have a monopoly and frankly they dont care about each users because they know we CANT switch)

  41. Alright, where are the public torrents? by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    So club members download the ISOs. How long until someone makes a torrent for the rest of us?

    C'mon guys, we're waiting.

    PS. Yes, we should all support our favorite distros, but some of us support many projects, some in ways other than just joining their club or buying their boxed releases.

  42. mandrake user guide by sewagemaster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    check out this mandrake user guide my friend wrote

    http://mandrakeuser.cjb.net/

    1. Re:mandrake user guide by joshki · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this guy into oblivion -- his website attempted to load software onto my machine, reset my home page, and several other nasty things.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
  43. Re:Why I refuse to use Mandrake now by Akai · · Score: 1

    Mandrake does not include spyware or adware you doof.

    They sold ads for the installation screens (which can, at least pre 9.2, I'm still downloading 9.2 like everyone else in the club) you could toggle the "consumer friendly" installed to a more advanced once that showed packages/progress instead, so no big deal.

    They sell ads on the default homepage, so change it if you don't like it.

    Other than that, please back up your claims that Mandrake, which is 100% free in the speech department now, has anything else.

    If you _really_ don't like it, download the sources, remove any ads you don't like, compile your own build, and have fun fapping away at whatever pictures you put in place of it.

    --
    Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
  44. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by random_static · · Score: 1
    but if you look at Windows XP out of the box it STANDS OUT and YELLS "I'm different!" (from previous versions of Windows)

    yeah, it yells "i'm trying to copy a different version of MacOS from the other versions of windows!". pity it doesn't yell "i've actually learned something from MacOS, unlike the other versions of windows!".

    myself, i don't much give a damn what a GUI looks like or what other GUIs it may or may not resemble; i care whether or not a GUI works and lets me do my job. by this standard, gnome and kde are both decent-to-good, windows is so-so at best, and macos is good to excellent. i might use a mac if the hardware was affordable, and/or if the most recent versions weren't going downhill in usability even as they're finally fixing their worthless-junk underlying OS problems.

  45. Re:Spyware? by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

    Yeah! No one does that with when the topic is Microsoft.

  46. Answer: no by michaelggreer · · Score: 1

    No, it wasn't intuitive enough. The more commands that can be moved elegantly in the UI itself, and out of the right-click list, the better. A list may be handy, but it is not an elegant solution.

    1. Re:Answer: no by Malor · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find that "feature" to be EXTREMELY annoying.... if you do it too fast, it's a double click, but if you do it slower than you need to, it's wasted time.

      "Click" and "double click" are ok metaphors, but "two slow clicks" is horrid, mostly because "slow" is so ill-defined. A very poor interface mechanism, IMO.

    2. Re:Answer: no by michaelggreer · · Score: 1

      I agree, actually. I prefer the "click-and-wait" approach used in Macs.

    3. Re:Answer: no by nicsterrr · · Score: 1

      You're describing the way it's implemented in MS Windows. It's a little different on 9.2 (KDE - don't know about Gnome). If you click/double click on the icon you select the icon/launch the file. If you click on the name below, you immediately edit the name.

    4. Re:Answer: no by Malor · · Score: 1

      That's good to hear. I was specifically criticizing the Windows implementation, which I despise. I haven't used 9.2 yet, so I can't exactly criticize it. :-)

    5. Re:Answer: no by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Do you actually realize what percentage of the computer-using population doesn't know how to double-click?

      That double-click-slowly-to-rename thing is one of the worst OS features that MS ever came up with. Go ahead, you try to explain it to someone over the age of 40. I dare you.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    6. Re:Answer: no by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1
      That double-click-slowly-to-rename thing is one of the worst OS features that MS ever came up with. Go ahead, you try to explain it to someone over the age of 40. I dare you.


      Nice. There are some of us 40-y/o's and up who know how to use a friggin' mouse, idiot.

      Stupid people come in all ages, flavors and sizes. The problem is that they outnumber geeks.
    7. Re:Answer: no by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Please don't take it personally.
      If I'm a drug-crazed script-kiddie raver, then you're a hunt-and-pecking viagra-addicted dot-com investor :)

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  47. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by niko9 · · Score: 1

    Surely a UI isn't much more difficult?

    Yes. Yes it is. And stop calling me Shirley.

    --

  48. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    Innovate? Stand out? Do you even know what you're talking about?

    Many, many people absolutely hate the "candy cane" XP GUI. The first thing a lot of people do after they have installed XP is to *switch back to classic mode*! They say it's annoying as hell, and I agree with them. It was cute for the first 25 minutes but after that, it started to distract me, so I turned it off.

    And if you have spend more time reading the comments, you'll find out that many, MANY people hate themed GUIs. Themed video players come in mind. They just want a simple and clean user interface without all sorts of colors distracting them! And some people think flat themes look more professional and less obtrusive.
    Flat, clean, simple, unobtrusive "Windows 95-ish" themes are better for usability! People want to get stuff done, not looking at candy all day!

    Sorry but you are severely overrating Windows's GUI. It ain't that great. I much prefer the "Windows 95-ish" Bluecurve theme over Luna.
    And you are associating "old" with "bad", and "new" with "innovation". That's plain wrong.

  49. Only mandrake members? by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

    google turns this up at #1
    http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/torrent/

    1. Re:Only mandrake members? by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 1

      If you notice, those are for the release candidates, not the final release. So this is nothing new.

  50. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. Part of my job is UI design and I have to say, until linux distro's start comming out with a familiar, improved UI, people aren't going to use linux. It's part of the reason I don't use it. Of course I understand how to use it...I've done small scale unix and linux coding...but do I enjoy using it? Not really. Sure, I don't enjoy a lot of things about Windows either, but I can shortcut my way to oblivion. Half of the stuff is automated and, while I like to control my machine as much as the next nerd, my computer is so much more powerful than what I really need at this point that speed and raw performance isn't an issue. Now, there are quite a few excellent Linux skins out there. They turn the operating system from something usable to something that I would even call practical. I, like the rest of society, have been brainwashed my MS. It's not that they've mastered the UI...it's that Windows has been shoved down our throats and, therefore, we're used to it. Why reinvent the wheel or, in this case, why learn something new when what we already have works fine? There's monetary reasons. There's legal reasons. There's even moral reasons. ...and tell that to your mom, dad, neighbor, friends, etc....well, you're likely to get the stinkeye. Whatever dude, Windows comes on my computer and I don't have the time to screw around with learning something new as a "hobby." Comes on their computer? Hobby? Ouch, those are fighting words for the opensource community...a group of people who deadicate their free time to giving the world a free, better alternative to corporate Windows. When in the past 50 years have you seen the hippies, PETA, etc. win? You really haven't, and that's what people see open source as. Anyways, enough with the rant. In short, mimic Windows except make it hip. Take example from popular software. Napster was a sentation, although it was one of the worst fileshare programs out there. It was hip though! VW bug's and golf's sell through the roof when, in actuality, they have some of the highest defect rates among manufacturers now. People buy iPod's when there's cheaper solutions. Make an image, make Linux cool. Heck, DONT EVEN CALL IT LINUX...get around the stigma of Linux and people might come. The scene is a great thing; however, I think for it to go anywhere you're going to have to have a few imaginative souls to take it to that next level, not just a few programming wiz kids.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  51. Re:Spyware? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

    i guess that's why there's a choice in the open source world. i'm a gentoo user myself, but i completely understand Mandrake's move to use advertisements in the install process and in screen savers. you've gotta pay the bills to keep dedicated people on staff and such. gentoo

  52. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by Akai · · Score: 1

    To me the WinXP interface stand up and yells:
    "I'm f*cking Fisher Price Windows, you penguin f*cker"

    the first thing I did when I had to work on and XP box was figure out how to turn off the obscenely silly new window colours/decorations. Then it was vaguely usable.

    --
    Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
  53. Re:Spyware? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    So....Why make a post here about how you won't touch it due to vaguely remembered spyware issues, when the real reason is performance and layout(which, I might add, have probably improved significantly since last you used Mandrake)?

    Makes it seem like you're just trolling or otherwise wanting to start an argument.

  54. Obviously you don't know how to speak french! by William+Baric · · Score: 1

    You may think you're cool for posting in french but what you wrote don't make much sense. The translation program you used is really fucked up.

  55. At last, no more sendmail by Jackdan · · Score: 1

    "System overview Mandrake Linux 9.2 features the following software: Apache 2.0.43, Samba 2.2.8a, MySQL 4.0.15, ProFTPD 1.2.8, Postfix 2.0.13, OpenSSH 3.6.1p2" Postfix 2.0.13, and no sendmail to be found (altho I only quickly looked at it). I don't know if this is the version version of mandrake that comes with postfix instead of sendmail, but this is great. Postfix is so much easier to configure then sendmail. And the little detail of the sendmail security history... All in all, this is a great choice imho.

  56. Re:"Transparent" proxies (Slashdot does the same) by Null-A · · Score: 1

    [Sorry for the dupe, i messed up the thread]
    Slashdot.org bans Spain :(
    Yep, I am tired of getting the dreaded pink slashdot screen (DPSS), after hitting several times F5 it loads the page correctly (weirdly developers.slashdot.org is the hardest to bypass)
    Why /. bans spain?
    Yep I know my evil "isp" hijacked the internet and put a transparent firewall but I CANT switch "isp" there is only one "real" adsl provider in spain Telefonica, the other ones are resellers of the same product. /. ban on spain lame
    (I tried once emailing /., one of the addresses listed in the DPSS, but to no avail , the /. admin want me to contact my adsl proxy administrator and from there the Telefonica "techies" (another joke) and /. admin resolve the matter, what a JOKE any one in Spain will LOL at that thought, its impossible to talk to any one in Telefonica, they have a monopoly and frankly they dont care about each users because they know we CANT switch)

  57. Haven't been to mandrake's site for a while by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    ...And I'm glad I went back, because I've been looking for a well-implemented Multi-Network Firewall product that can be deployed for free (as in no money) for a couple of my non-profit clients. Certainly, the for-profits don't mind spending $1000+ on a good firewall software package, but the non-profits (a charity and a church) have need for something like this, but simply can't afford a non-open-source package. Hoorary for Mandrake!

    I've already renewed my Mandrake Club membership, and if you appreciate the work they do, you should think about doing so as well.

    --
    Who did what now?
  58. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are you serious? Or are you just trolling..
    Anyway: There are many *high quality* themes for download on sites such as kde-look.org and art.gnome.org which offer themes that are IMHO *far* superior to the cludged, butt-ugly Luna theme Windows XP ships with. These include so-called meta-themes which provide the right images for Gnome and KDE apps, as well as apps with their own theming engine such as XMMS and Mozilla/Epiphany/Firebird/...

    I personally prefer the nice and clean themes RedHat and Mandrake have been producing their last few releases over the 'round' Aqua buttons any day. When I see a new RedHat install I can correctly assume that the 'underscore'-button minimises the window, the 'box'-button resizes it and the cross closes it. I wouldn't know what the green-yellow-red buttons on Os X stand for.

    On designing a UI: this *is* in fact not as easy as it seems, and certainly not as easy as designing a nice and clean website. Believe me, I have created some Linux themes, and have not yet released any of them to the public, simply because I don't think they're good enough.

    Of course, you're always welcome to design your own theme and provide it to the community.

  59. I'm not impressed by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    For a distribution that claims to have the "latest and most up-to-date" software, I'm very unimpressed with some of the software that's included. Here's a couple of examples:

    No Samba 3.0.
    No KDE 3.2.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    1. Re:I'm not impressed by chipster · · Score: 1

      Remember, they freeze the packaging and development trees when it's considered "stable". Unfortunately, Samba 3.0, etc. was released prior to the freeze. Don't fret, as I'm certain there will be contrib RPMs for these soon.

    2. Re:I'm not impressed by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      The don't have Gnome 2.5, either. Retrograde trolls.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    3. Re:I'm not impressed by general_boy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Samba 3.0 (release) is in the cooker contribs with package names samba3*. I'm running it now at work. It's packaged to be installed (but not ran) simultaneously with Samba 2.x, using a 3 suffix for all conflicting files and directory names.

      Haven't seen the 9.2 release contribs though - has anyone? At least a Samba 3.0 RC should be in there, if not the release.

  60. Re:Hmmm by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    Releases happen between the time they finalize everything for GM release and the time of the actual release?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  61. DVD release? by alexandre · · Score: 1

    Are they going to be releasing 9.2 as a single DVD?
    That would rock to just have to pop in 1 DVD and go to bed :-)

    1. Re:DVD release? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Of course not!!!

      DVDs == MPAA

      CDs == RIAA

      We can only download the Ogg (coz MP3 == soft patents)

      Even if they released on DVD it would need two: one for the movie and another one for the extras (behind the scenes and stuff)

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:DVD release? by ErixTr · · Score: 1

      Yes, the 9.2 DVD can be preordered from http://www.mandrakestore.com/

      --
      less is more
    3. Re:DVD release? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Hello, this is Erix and I pronounce Windows as Winsucks.

      Honey, I fixed the winsuck, so you can get some fresh air in the house, finally.

      Honey, some kid knocked a baseball through the big winsuck in the living room.

      Honey, I cleaned the kids' fingerprints off all the winsucks in the house.

      Honey: What the FUCK are you saying?

      Standards are for pussies.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:DVD release? by ErixTr · · Score: 1

      Interesting approach to a signature, for a person whose signature is "standards are for pussies".

      --
      less is more
    5. Re:DVD release? by fanpoe · · Score: 1

      It's a linux dist story on Slashdot. Obviously the comments should be assumed to be case sensitive ;)

  62. Downloads availible... by kcb93x · · Score: 1
    I clicked on 'will soon become a member of mandrake club' got redirected to this page:

    http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3#586

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Downloads availible... by Lshmael · · Score: 1

      The members get ISOs. Mandrake does not care, however, if you are willing to take the time to download the entire tree from their mirrors. None of those mirrors on the page you linked include ISOs.

  63. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is Mandrake 9.2. It's obviously better.

  64. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by Zelet · · Score: 1

    Actually when you hover over the bottons (or near them an "X" a "-" and a "+" appear.

    Also if you haven't figured it out.

    Red = stop (close the app)
    Yellow = caution (minimzise the app or halfway between green and red)
    Green = go (maximize)

    They are relying on tried and true GUI design - knowledge in the head vs. knowledge in the system. Knowledge in the head is stuff you you know and can relate to without reading about it.

    Apple implemented both unintrusive "knowledge in the world" and "knowledge in the head."

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
  65. Mandrake is bleeding edge.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    And as that its probably a little better then sid (or the same, or worse..). I love it because it has all the latest greatist new geewiz stuff.

    Personally I'd say the most stable release was 8.2, so maybe the 9.2 will be too. I've been using the 9.2 beta for about a month now and its been pretty good so far (but I can't wait for more packages to become available for it!).

    Mandrake is great for those of us who want a cutting edge computing. Probably the best thing for the server yet.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  66. Re:all i want to know by jd142 · · Score: 1

    Here's a nickel, buy a clue. They aren't charging for iso's. They're charging for the privilege of:

    1) Deciding what to include in the distro through RPM voiting

    2) The ability to download iso's before the general public.

    3) Lot's of other features and benefits like discounts on software.

    ISO's will be available on ftp servers for free when the software ships.

    Don't you think it make sense to reward those people that actually contribute money to the developers?

  67. Re:all i want to know by blixel · · Score: 1

    If they're screwed up enough to charge for access to the isos, find a better distro.

    Oh no! God forbid that a company would actually want to recooperate some of the money the spend on bandwidth and development!

    There's nothing wrong with what they're doing. The ISO's can legally be mirrored by anyone who wants to mirror them. Making the ISO's initially available only to club members just provides them with a few extra dollars to pay the bills.

    But I guess that's wrong. So tell me, what is this great job you have where you work without getting paid for no better reason than to help others?

  68. Use mkisofs to create boot CD from boot floppy by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    You can use mkisofs to create an .ISO file from any boot floppy:

    mkisofs -b bootfloppy.img -c boot.catalog -o bootcd.iso

    The file bootcd.iso can be burned to a CD using your favourite CD burning software.

    However, there are some caveats regarding ramdisk creation. See the file README.eltorito in the mkisofs documentation for details.

    1. Re:Use mkisofs to create boot CD from boot floppy by wemmick · · Score: 3, Informative
      When I tried this and got an error:

      % mkisofs -b network.img -c boot.catalog -o bootcd.iso
      mkisofs: Missing pathspec.

      I added network.img to the end of the command and it worked:

      % mkisofs -b network.img -c boot.catalog -o bootcd.iso network.img
      Size of boot image is 2880 sectors -> Emulating a 1440 kB floppy
      Total translation table size: 2048
      Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0
      Total directory bytes: 0
      Path table size(bytes): 10
      Max brk space used 3000
      768 extents written (1 Mb)

      --
      ___
      Cognitive Overflow
      more than yo
  69. Re:WTF!!!? by jargoone · · Score: 1

    I know you're trolling, but I'll respond. CDE isn't that bad as far as looks, but it's a horrible for stability. I know, I use it on a day-to-day basis. I'm a rebel around my parts, everyone else around here actually uses OpenWindows. [[shudder]]

  70. Re:My french is rather bad, but... by William+Baric · · Score: 1

    No it means :

    Mandrake linux 9.2 is a distribution made for people who as to obtain toward the high of buttocks of strange losers. It takes 20 minutes for that to copy a 17 MB folder. Almost as bad as the OS of the raincoat (1). If the "youre" (2) searching a decent distro, please try (3) the red edition of the hat's "moron" (4).

    (1) "imper" is a colloquial abbreviation for "impermeable" which means raincoat.

    (2) the translation program wasn't able to translate this typo (youre instead of you're)

    (3) There was a mistake here that cannot be translated in english. "Essayent" means try as in "they try". If the meaning is "you try" then the word should be "essayez".

    (4) in french the word moron doesn't exist and should have been translated with "cretin".

  71. Re:The club? - It's how you buy access to the docs by erioshi · · Score: 1

    I'm a long time Mandrake user who loaded 8.2 on my (home) server; it's been solid so I've left it running.

    With the 9.2 comming out, I figured it was time to upgrade. Interestingly, when I went to find all those spiffy docs pages that I used to set up and configure my 8.2 set-up it turns out they are now all "hidden" behind the walls of the pay-to-play "club" website.

    This really bothers me; it seems completely opposit of what the open source movement is about. Convoluted really - "Have a free bottle of beer, but we'll charge you for sitting and talking with your friends..." or perhaps "Here's the source code, but I have to charge you to talk about it..." I can respect the need for MandrakeSoft to make money, but I can say this hasn't increased my desire to become a club member. It's just so .. slimy ..

    Even Mirosoft lets users access their technical info database without cost.

  72. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by jejones · · Score: 1

    "Can he resist clicking on the bright, candy-colored window?"

    "NO, I CAAAAAAN'T!"

    Seriously, what's so great about the garish blue and red window dressing on Windows XP, and aren't you just suggesting imitation at a higher level of indirection? (Be innovative...just like Windows XP!)

  73. Re:all i want to know by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    Here's a nickel, buy a clue.

    Here's your nickel back. You'll need it to buy a sense of humor.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  74. Non bittorrent option? by m3000 · · Score: 1

    I'm one of those students behind the University of Florida's ICARUS system (metioned here)
    and they've blocked bit torrent since it acts like a server and could be used to spread copyrighted things. I am also a member of Mandrake Club, but at the moment it looks like all they have avaliable is Bit Torrent downloads. Does anyone know when it'll be avaliable for download off FTP?

    1. Re:Non bittorrent option? by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Have you considered transferring to a school in which IT isn't run by network Nazis?

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:Non bittorrent option? by m3000 · · Score: 1

      Well they sprung it on us when we moved in for the semester, so it's a tad late to get out my housing contract and then find a good apartment.

      Secondly I have a year and a half left, so it's really dumb to transfer now. But lets just say it's weighing heavily on my not wanting to go here for grad school.

    3. Re:Non bittorrent option? by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Fair enough--transferring in the last year would indeed be a bad move.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  75. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by nicsterrr · · Score: 1

    troll-troll troll-troll..

  76. chagrin by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
    Mandrake changed their site recently, and I could no longer find 9.2 RC2. It also looks and feels corporate, not the friendly, geeky old Mandrake of ages past.

    I confess that I have been guilty of using Mandrake software in the past without ever paying. Since we use RedHat at work, I have been switching over home machines from Mandrake to RedHat, and actually forked out a big $60 to RedHat for their annual support.

    Years ago, I switched from RedHat to Mandrake for its ease of installation and update, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that now RedHat is also quite easy to install and update.

  77. Re:The club? - It's how you buy access to the docs by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, the official Mandrake documentation is available to all, club member or not. So, too, is the troubleshooting information located in the forums. There is a club member only section called documentation for tips and tricks, but it's not from Mandrake but from other club members (so it would never have been included in 8.2 anyway).

    The installation and user documentation is available for free from the "docs" link on the club site and it is also included in the distro itself.

    In short, the documentation is still freely available, to those who support Mandrake and those who do not. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that since you've chosen not to support Mandrake by becoming a member (because it's so slimy) that you will be supporting them by ordering a boxed set.

    Joeb

    p.s. Microsoft does not let users access ALL their technical info database without cost. We pay a hefty subscription to get detailed info that isn't available on their "free" website.

  78. KDE 3.2? by Synn · · Score: 1

    Um, KDE 3.2 is ALPHA software.

    Why should Mandrake ship alpha software on the desktop?

    1. Re:KDE 3.2? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      My bad... I thought it was released already.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  79. The irony of bittorrent by vlad_petric · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As a MDK club member myself, I first applauded the measure to release first to us and then to everybody.

    As I'm downloading it right now, I'm wondering however if releasing to everybody through bittorrent wouldn't have been a better choice, as that would imply faster downloads for club members as well ...

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:The irony of bittorrent by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's a very good point. If I had any mod points, I'd give you +1 Insightful.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
  80. Re:i586 by Synn · · Score: 1

    If you're really happy with Debian, then not really.

    Gentoo has portage which is pretty much the same as apt. The big different between Debian and Gentoo is that under Gentoo you'll be compiling all your software specifically to your specs. This has advantages other than just compiling to your specific processor.

    Gentoo's portage tree is also a bit more up to date then Debian's.

    If you have a fast machine, it might be worth switching just to check it out. If you have a slow machine though, stick with Debian.

  81. Re:Why I refuse to use Mandrake now by blixel · · Score: 1

    Mandrake added spyware and adware to their releases

    Says the anonymous coward....

  82. Re:Nice, but Gentoo hits the streets every day.... by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    The only way forward is an online software distribution and management system such as Portage: now your distro hits the streets every day.

    My distro gets updated every day too, via urpmi, and it *is* Mandrake (cooker).

    A distro that offers KDE 3.1.3 or lower is by definition old. I want the latest and greatest

    Oh, you want the latest *number*, you don't actually care about the software then? Mandrake's KDE-3.1.3 has most of the bugfixes from the 3.1 tree that were available a week before 3.1.4, and you would notice that most KDE apps actually have 3.1.4 as the version number.

    But all you care about is the version number on the package.

  83. Re:mod parent up by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I love debian, adore it. I'm going back from RedHat 9 to sarge/sid this month. But I still think that's uncalled for.

  84. Re:WTF!!!? by jargoone · · Score: 1

    About 95% of what I do is in xterm, and I have plenty of control of colors and font in there. You apparently have a different idea of "not ugly" than I do. I don't need gradients or shadows or pretty menus. I need to do WORK, and have it not hurt my eyes, since I do it 40 hours a week.. By those standards, it's fine.

  85. Re:Downloads available... by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    Well, then, for those wanting to download the entire tree...there you go...

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  86. Damn - Just when I'd finished downloading ... by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Shrike freshrpms weighing in at 300meg...

    Because the sauce is just so much better when it's red...

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  87. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    lol, yeah, someone forgot their tags today...whoops :)

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  88. Does it hurt? by axxackall · · Score: 1
    Mandrake Linux 9.2 Hits the Street

    I'd like to ask Mandrake users: does it hurt to hit the street? And does the street hit back?

    Jokes aside, but if all those release bumps still hurt you by pushing for re-installation, please consider the distro with which you will be always up to date without any hitting the street.

    --

    Less is more !
  89. Well played! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Hazzah! Well played, Anonymous Coward!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  90. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by shibbie · · Score: 1

    Granted certain themed media players suck, but thats only a usability issue not a gui issue. Winamp 2 can have skins, and its IMHO a hell of lot better than Winamp 3. Likewise with WM9, its bloated GUI sucks it down IMHO.

  91. raw tree = Cooker? by gr0k · · Score: 1

    I'm not a club member, so I've been trying to do a network install using the "raw tree" mirrors. However (when I find one that isn't full) it says it's Mandrake 9.2 Cooker? And when it gets to the step where it downloads available packages it fails. I must have tried at least 6 different mirrors and get the same thing each time. Anyone else get this? Are none of the mirrors updated yet?

    --
    http://evoketv.com - TV Listings 2.0
    1. Re:raw tree = Cooker? by mtsv01 · · Score: 1

      It misses the hdlist2.cz because hdlists points at the wrong location. And I see no way of changing this without downloading the entire tree.

    2. Re:raw tree = Cooker? by gr0k · · Score: 1

      I see what you mean. Do you also see "Cooker" in the graphical installer? The mirrors must not be fully updated. :(

      --
      http://evoketv.com - TV Listings 2.0
    3. Re:raw tree = Cooker? by knapkin · · Score: 1

      Not quite. An hdlist is required for each separate source directory used. In this case they correspond to the RPMS, contrib and jpackage directories, not 3 CD's. Hopefully when my mirror finishes its sync, all will be well.

  92. Question by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Now this isnt a troll (at least, not this time), but Ive always been curious by a particular dichotomy in what people say regarding this.

    They tend to make fun of Microsoft releasing another OS every few years (95, 98, ME in 2000, Win2k, WinXP in 2001, Windows 2k3). But they also seem to blatently ignore all the 'point' releases (which seems really insane in the case of Apple, which makes you pay for the point release upgrades).

    Now Im not going to say that they shouldnt upgrade or improve their product- quite the opposite. In the real world things need to be built and then improved over time.

    My question, then, is why is it good for one OS but bad for another? Is it just a blind, rabid hatred of everything Microsoft? Or is it just habitual complaining?

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:Question by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      My question, then, is why is it good for one OS but bad for another? Is it just a blind, rabid hatred of everything Microsoft? Or is it just habitual complaining?

      The complaints would probably cease, to an extent, if Microsoft didn't intentionally break little things in every release and make other attempts to force you to buy an upgrade. Linux distributions, on the other hand, never force you to buy an upgrade. (And when they have tried, they usually get their asses kicked over it. We don't like it at all)

      The only time you *need* to upgrade your linux distribution is when you can no longer compile the software you need. Simple as that. With RPM-based distributions, you can usually install rpms from later versions until the distribution had to change basic shit around. It's not a good idea, but you can always get the source for the software and install from that, anyway.

      As far as keeping your system patched properly, you don't *need* to upgrade your distribution to do that, but it is usually the easiest way to do it.

      Personally, I find that Windows doesn't break a lot of compatibility if you typically use 3rd party software anyway, so the frequency of the releases isn't that bad. Windows as an OS isn't that bad, generally. I don't like it, but it's not that bad. Microsoft as a software vendor is a different story. You can use 3rd party apps in place of almost everything microsoft makes, and then you're not totally stuck in the forced upgrade cycle usually associated with Windows. The short of it is this: If you use a LOT of Microsoft software, you're really forcing the upgrades on yourself. Freedom is available, and it's not time for you (or anyone else) to be responsible for that fact. If you don't want it, fine, don't get it. ;) (that last part isn't directed at you specifically)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Question by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Windows as an OS isn't that bad, generally. I don't like it,
      > but it's not that bad.

      Yeah, that used to be my opinion. I'd switched from Win95 to Linux,
      because there were a couple of things about Linux that I liked better
      (primarily, stability -- and Win95 is not the most stable Windows
      available), so my opinion was that Windows was okay, in itself. I
      even kept a Windows partition (WinMe) around on my multiboot desktop,
      in case I should ever want it for any reason.

      Yeah. Then we had the big power outage, and I started having some
      filesystem problems, which eventually came to a head and forced me
      to leave off using my root filesystem. No problem, I'll get a new
      hard drive (and, while I'm at it, a UPS), install Linux on there,
      copy over my data from my old filesystem, and be good to go -- and
      meanwhile I'll just run Windows while I wait for my new HD and UPS
      to arrive.

      So I've been running Windows for a week or so now, and it's way,
      way more annoying than it used to be before I was used to Mandrake.
      When I was using Mandrake, I was like, "Well, I prefer this, but
      Windows isn't so bad." Only now that I'm using it again, Windows
      *sucks*. There are a thousand little things, each individually no
      big deal, that continually annoy me. I can't *wait* for my order
      to arrive so I can get back to normal.

      There are, however, two things that are better in Windows than
      in Mandrake. First, Emacs has better scrollbars. It's a very
      small thing, since normally I use the cursor-movement keys way
      more than the scrollbars, but the scrollbars in NTEmacs are
      without question absolutely better than the Athena 3D junk you
      get in Emacs under X. The second thing is, OpenOffice under
      Windows knows how to use my system colours on the screen and
      automagically translate them to black and white when printing.
      This won't matter for people who leave their system colours set
      to black on white, but for those of us who don't like going
      snowblind, this is a major plus. I'm going to miss this feature
      in OpenOffice when I go back to Linux. (However, I only use
      OpenOffice a few minutes at a time a few times a week, so it's
      not worth staying in Windows over.)

      Oh, yeah: and the other day my sister wanted me to look at
      something that's on the other computer upstairs, and I told her
      I couldn't get to it because networking wasn't working, and so
      Windows probably needed to be rebooted. (TCP/IP was working
      fine, of course, just NetBIOS was hosed -- usually a good sign
      you need to reboot.) So, she told me, "Well, so reboot", but
      I was like, "But I just rebooted _yesterday_." Then I realised
      what I'd just said. Sarah made fun of me. It's funny; when I
      used Windows, I was never convinced by the rebooting argument,
      because I figured I turned my computer off at night anyway when
      I wasn't using it. But after using Linux for a year or so I have
      become addicted to leaving windows open for days on end and never
      needing to _finish_ with everything at once in order to reboot.
      Power outages annoy me a lot more than they used to. Yeah, I'm
      getting a UPS, and I can't wait until my package arrives.

      Okay, so Windows isn't that bad -- if you're used to it. But I
      want my real system back. Soon. I hope my package comes tomorrow.
      Oh, and Mandrake 9.2? Oh, yes, I want that too.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:Question by t0ny · · Score: 1
      My first suggestion is to avoid any Win9x platform like the plague. I am a strictly Windows guy, but I cant use it. It was great back around 95, but there are much better alternatives.

      Stick with Windows 2000. You *could* go with XP, but it has many things (UI changes, rearranged control panel applet functions, etc) which prevent me from liking it.

      Win9x is just TOO unstable, even in your average user environment. Considering you can purchase a Win2k license for just as much as a Win9x license (even if you *can* purchase it), you are just better off.

      As for your last part, ya, rebooting whenever it starts acting funny is essential. If anyone said they had a problem at work (they still have about half win9x machines), my first suggestion is to reboot. Cures about 90% of problems. This isnt a problem under NT 5.x (2000, XP, and 2003).

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    4. Re:Question by insensitive+claude · · Score: 1
      But they also seem to blatently ignore all the 'point' releases (which seems really insane in the case of Apple, which makes you pay for the point release upgrades).

      t0ny, you're a b00b. Or maybe you're just new to computers.

      All commercial OS vendors charge for point releases. It's sad that the Microsoft naming scheme adopted in the summer of '95 would lead you to believe otherwise. Windows XP is just NT v5.1. Windows 2000 was v5.0. And so it goes throughout the product lines...

      Don't get me started about all the MS products that skipped directly to version 3 or 4 on their first release.

    5. Re:Question by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Stick with Windows 2000.

      The only reason I accepted Win95 in the first place is because it was able to
      run my DOS apps, and had multitasking, and came with the computer. If it
      hadn't done all of those things, I'd have stuck with DOS until I got my hands
      on a Linux distro (which I was already planning to try; I'd got my hands on a
      library book about learning to use Unix at some point and wanted to experiment
      with that -- Linux seemed like the way to do that (since I hadn't heard of BSD
      yet at the time)). This was January 1998, so NT still had a reputation for
      showing the BSOD quite a lot and did NOT have a reputation for running DOS apps.

      My motivation for getting WinMe was largely sentimental -- I knew it would be
      the last version in the product line, and having used Win95 for several years
      I wanted to have it, even though I knew very well by then that I wouldn't ever
      use it for my primary OS.

      WinXP came on several of the computers at work, including my workstation, which
      I promptly converted to dual-boot. I value having WinXP there, because it
      allows me to test various things. Though the thing I most often boot it for
      is to test my web stuff to see how it looks in MSIE, there are occasions when
      I need to test assorted other things, and it's handy to have that around.
      As an intersting point of trivia, yesterday I saw an XP BSOD for the first
      time ever. (So, yeah, it's definitely more stable than Win9x, as we've had
      WinXP on _several_ PCs for six months.)

      But having been stuck with Windows for the past week, it's not the things I
      thought would bother me that are bothering me. I haven't had _that_ many
      crashes, and most of them were just regular app crashes, which occasionally
      happen on Mandrake also (especially since I have a tendency to try out the
      bleeding-edge alpha versions of some software, e.g., Mozilla). No big deal.
      I expected to have to reboot because of Windows going wonky all the time,
      but that's only happened once or twice. The networking-suddenly-doesn't-work
      thing (which I've seen before many times on other systems) annoyed me, but
      again that only happened once. The little things that annoy me constantly
      are UI issues. The telnet that comes with Windows refuses to run in the
      shell window I start it from, so I have to type C:\cygwin\bin\telnet.exe
      in order to get a telnet that will run inside of (e.g.) eshell. I don't
      have my leftside panel-full-of-drawers, so I have to make do with either
      the start menu or icons on the desktop. Icons on the desktop are hidden
      by N maximised windows -- yeah, I could "show desktop", but I don't *want*
      to, because I really still want those Windows where they are. As for the
      start menu, it's always been klunky (which is, I'm convinced, why most
      Windows users litter their desktop with a billion icons), but it's gotten
      worse in newer versions; now most of the options are hidden, and I have to
      click the little double-arrow thingies all the time, as if navigating the
      start menu didn't have enough steps already. Also, missing my left panel
      means I don't have the date always showing (and the clock only if I set the
      taskbar not to autohide, which is annoying particularly if I have a lot of
      windows open and need more than one row) and don't have a meter showing my
      RAM/swap usage; a small thing, but I've become accustomed to it, and it *is*
      useful. Additionally, every time I put a CD in, Windows Media junk insists
      on opening, even though it's *not* the CD player app I want to use. I can't
      figure out how to disable that. Also, my drive letters, for reasons I'm not
      confident I can explain perfectly, have changed around two or three times
      in the last week, even though none of the drives in question have been
      removed or changed cables or anything. (I do have way more partitions than
      the usual Windows quota of one, but it *ought* to handle that better.) In
      Linux /data is alwa

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:Question by t0ny · · Score: 1
      I don't have my leftside panel-full-of-drawers, so I have to make do with either the start menu or icons on the desktop. You can try using the Quicklaunch buttons on the task bar. I used to have to run a LOT of different tools at one job, so I expanded the QL bar to take up a whole row. It worked out well for me, anyway.

      As for the start menu, it's always been klunky (which is, I'm convinced, why most Windows users litter their desktop with a billion icons), but it's gotten worse in newer versions; now most of the options are hidden, and I have to click the little double-arrow thingies all the time, as if navigating the start menu didn't have enough steps already

      I hate menu customization also. R-click the taskbar, select 'properties', and uncheck 'use personalized menues'.

      IMO, I hate having everything dumped in there as well, so I generally organize the start menu with categories. I tend to put any system tools which dont get selected very often (like the virus scanner, which usually just does its own thing) into Accessories, I have a folder on my home machine called Games which has all those, office apps have their own folder, etc. It makes it a bit easier- I hate seeing multi-page start menus!

      Additionally, every time I put a CD in, Windows Media junk insists on opening, even though it's *not* the CD player app I want to use. I can't figure out how to disable that

      I havent seen the problem being Media Player, I think disabling autorun in general is kind of buggy. There are two ways I know of to do it, but they are both flaky (because it still works occasionally), and there is another problem where Windows doesnt look at the disk unless autorun is enabled. Its strange, and honestly I think its a hardware problem rather than something with Windows (the newer machines at work dont do this).

      Anyway, you can try TweakUI from Microsoft (there is a 9x/NT/2000 version and a different XP version); if you cant find it try looking for 'Power Toys' or 'Power Tools'.

      Anyway, it gives a lot of other UI enhancements, but they are mostly per-user settings (in case you have different machines or accounts).

      Also, my drive letters, for reasons I'm not confident I can explain perfectly, have changed around two or three times in the last week, even though none of the drives in question have been removed or changed cables or anything. (I do have way more partitions than the usual Windows quota of one, but it *ought* to handle that better.)

      Thats strange. Try using Disk Manager (not sure about where XP hides it, but from a command prompt type in MMC. From there, go to Console, Add/Remove Snap-in, and choose "Disk Management". From there you can statically assign or change drive letters; just bear in mind that changing a hard drive letter could mess up any applications installed on that drive.

      I always set up multiple partitions on servers, because having your application data or user data on the same drive as your OS is a really bad idea; so I know Win2000 can handle multiple partitions well (unless there is some weird hardware issue happening).

      With command.com it's the shell, and with cygwin it's the fact that the shell doesn't quite integrate with the OS as completely as it ought.)

      Im thinking you should be using cmd.exe instead of command.com; command.com is left in for legacy applications, but the NT command interpreter is cmd.exe. See if that helps.

      I don't dare mount the smb share on the Windows PC upstairs properly (i.e., assign a drive letter),

      In the same disk management screen, you can also mount a drive so its only accessible via a UNC. there are several options when it comes to mounting partitions; just poke thru the help file for descripts. I guess one problem you may be having is that some apps arent UNC aware (a problem I run into a lot with legacy apps, but sometimes with poorly written custom stuff). In this case you

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    7. Re:Question by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > You can try using the Quicklaunch buttons on the task bar
      That's okay for a few things, and would be a more than adequate substitute
      for launchers directly on the panel, but it won't do as a replacement for
      drawers; I'd have two or three rows' worth of the taskbar filled with
      quicklaunch buttons, and that's just not a good UI. I much prefer having the
      entire panel along the bottom edge of the screen be the tasklist, and put the
      drawers full of launchers in my left-edge panel.

      > uncheck 'use personalized menues'.
      Oh, that helps, thanks. Who on earth decided to call them "personalized"
      menus, when rather than being personalized to my preferences (as the regular
      old Windows 95 start menu was) they have a mind of their own?

      > you can try TweakUI
      I know about that. Many times I've said, "Windows isn't finished being
      installed until TweakUI is installed". And yes, I always turn off the data
      and music cd autoplaying in "Things that happen behind your back", but in
      WinMe the Windows Media Player still opens up when I put in a music CD.

      > Try using Disk Manager
      This is Windows Me, not NT/2000/XP. And yeah, I know it's strange, and that
      most Windows systems do not exhibit this behavior. I think it's because I
      have entirely too many partitions. Maybe it's time to kill off that old
      Windows 95 partition I never use anymore and turn it into swap space...

      > I always set up multiple partitions on servers
      Yeah, but this is a multiboot desktop. It's got ten or twelve partitions
      on four drives. Bootable ones include Windows 95 OSR2, DOS 6, RH6 (which
      is another one I never use anymore and probably ought to drez soon), Mandrake
      8.1, and Windows Me. (The Mandrake 9.1 root partition is the one that's
      currently on the fritz, though I suspect all the partitions on that physical
      drive ought to be relocated; I'm planning to do that as soon as my new drive
      comes.)

      > I'm thinking you should be using cmd.exe
      cmd.exe handles some things better than command.com, but it doesn't handle
      shell escapes much better, and so Perl one-liners are still impractical.
      I ended up just keeping a temp.pl open in Emacs all the time. But you
      probably suggested cmd.exe out of confusion thinking I'm on NT; this is
      WinMe. At work I have WinXP, but there's no hardware problem there, and
      so Mandrake is working just fine, and so I only boot WinXP to test stuff
      (mainly, to test web stuff in MSIE, so I can work around its deficiencies).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  93. Re:all i want to know by jd142 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I thought about that after I posted. I tend to be very literal when I'm reading.

  94. ISOs not available through FTP yet by dacarr · · Score: 1
    The versioning is still there, but the only ISOs that are available are for RC2. You have to dig for those, and I'm not convinced they're really a good thing since they're a release candidate rather than the shelf version.

    I'm still pondering the idea of going silver with them, just to contribute to the cause, but...well, I'm broke.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  95. Re:download rate -- sucks! by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 1
    Currently the max I've seen is 66 KB/s, min 230 B/s, average ~43 KB/s sitting at an estimate of 11 hours with 9% down on the PowerPak.

    Even when the FTP servers are getting hammered I can get better rates than this, usually under 2 hours for a complete CD ISO.

    I WANT MY OC-3!

    --
    This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
  96. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    > Funny then that this download is only for paying memembers. Like some others have pointed out, public Bittorent link please.

    I suggest you read Stallman on the subject. If any of the paying members want to set up their own servers hosting it, they're Free to do so. If they don't, tough - Mandrake are well within their rights. Besides, as has been pointed out elsewhere, the distro is available for anyone to download - it's just the ISOs which are currently limited to Mandrake Club members.

  97. Re:all i want to know by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Normally I ignore spelling errors, but I wanted to point this one out because I found it particularly entertaining.

    God forbid that a company would actually want to recooperate some of the money the spend on bandwidth and development!

    So, they would cooperate again some of the money? ;) I think you were looking for recuperate.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  98. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by shibbie · · Score: 1

    Windows XP's interface is garish I agree, its not fantastic. I just used it as a well known example. I look at modern kde/gnome distros and just think Windows 95 lookalikes. I think we need some sort of commonality with Windows (i.e. a start bar), but need the sort of layout like an enhanced afterstep. Developers may say they like the current GUI's because they get the job done. IMHO punters and going to want something more, especially if its to wow them in the face of Apple and Microsoft GUIs which appear out of the box to be more striking. As a developer I often find between revisions of programs people say "oh nothing's changed" yet I may well have re-written the entire engine behind it. Likewise with Linux, the punters are only going to sit up and take notice if they are startled immediately by the way it looks or some wizzy visual fetaures.

  99. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Free != free.

    Once you've paid for it, you can do anything with it (within the GPL's limitations) - including re-selling it to someone else, or putting it up for free download via BitTorrent. If someone puts it up for free download, you can get it - perfectly legally - for free.

    Mandrake also has the freedom NOT to provide it to anyone who hasn't paid, as long as the source is included with the binaries they're selling.

  100. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

    Software wants to be free. Unfortunately, bandwidth does not.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  101. Re:all i want to know by CameronGary · · Score: 1

    None of the above. I think the word in quetion is 'recoup' - no 'erate'. It's an interesting mistake though, since recuperate means to regain health ...

  102. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by hitmark · · Score: 1

    free links and ftp mirros will show up in time, its just that they are giveing the mandrakeclub meber as bit of a headstart, thats all. and i see nothing bad in that as the members help fuel the mandrake engine...

    oh anf GPL != "free beer", its clearly stated that you can take payment for any media, packaing or whatever, you only have to enable the customer to access the source in some way (be it giveing out free ftp access to source, or maybe putting a printed copy of the source into a book in the box).what you cant do is the microsoft way and license the number of installs (or maybe you can not realy sure)...

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  103. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by Wokan · · Score: 1

    There is nothing to prevent a BitTorrent recipient redistributing it. But it cheapens our personal investment in MandrakeClub and our belief in supporting MandrakeSoft though that club if we take our paid-for priveleges and just hand them over to anyone who asks.

    You'll have your free Mandrake 9.2 ISO files. You'll have them in a couple of weeks like all the others who can not or will not support Mandrake through the club or by contributing to the development of the Mandrake distribution.

    I put up my $120 / year for Mandrake. Where's yours?

  104. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by hitmark · · Score: 1

    when someone made a macosx lookalike skin for kde he/she (i belvie i read it was a woman but not sure) got a letter/mail from apple threatening to sue.

    as for square menus and buttons, most likely its a limit based on either qt or xfree (or both).

    oh and take a look at karamba:)

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  105. Boot floppy creation problem in 9.1 by nettarzan · · Score: 1

    I am booting my system using boot floppy. My BIOS boot loader cannot boot from the hard-disk after I installed a second hard-disk.
    I did an upgrade from 9.0 to 9.1. Mandrake installation of 9.1 did not create a valid boot floppy for me when I installed. So I was basically screwed by the upgrade. So I had to revert back to 9.0 installation which faithfully creates a bootable floppy everytime.

    Now you tell me there is a 9.2 version?

  106. Do Powerpack users get free club membership? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    I've bought the 7.1 and 8.0 powerpacks, and I'd consider the 9.2 powerpack, but you should get at least some form of club membership (silver for 6 mos, for example) when you buy the box set.

    1. Re:Do Powerpack users get free club membership? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It is for a limitied time, I think along the lines of a month. then you get an unlimited alumni account which lets you still post to the forumns.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  107. urpmi tips by JCholewa · · Score: 1

    > If you're not sure of the package name, you can
    > search with "urpmi -y name", which will give you
    > a list of related packages.

    You could alternatively do the following:
    urpmf --summary -i someprogram | sort -u

    This will list all programs out there in the RPM databases that are called someprogram (actually, it'll also list programs with someprogram in the summary) and provide a one-line summary. The sort part just puts it in alphabetical order and gets rid of duplicate entries if it so happens that the program is listed in more than one RPM database.

    I use the following command to list available program categories:
    urpmf --group . | sed s/^.*:// | sort -u
    (it returns a rather big list, so I hope that your term/console can scroll up and down)

    And here's how you install every single available application from the "Emulators" category:
    urpmf --group Emulators | sed s/:.*$// | xargs urpmi --no-verify-rpm

    I'm putting together some sort of quick reference to all this at:
    http://www.jc-news.com/linux/urpmi.html
    It's rather messy and unfinished right now, though. :)

    > And to upgrade everything, do "urpmi --auto-select",
    > hit yes a couple of times and give it a while.

    I recommend:
    urpmi --auto-select --auto --no-verify-rpm
    That way it won't prompt you to hit anything. It'll just do it all automatically.

    Lately, I have:
    urpmi.update -a
    and:
    urpmi --upgrade --auto-select --auto --no-verify-rpm
    in my crontab (scheduler) file, set to run daily. The first command makes sure that my RPM database (the list of programs offered for download online) is up to date. The second command installs all recommended programs from any source tagged as an "upgrade" source.

    So far, daily auto-updates have not annihilated my computer. I have had only two problems:

    1) when I added the non-official Texstar rpm source and ran:
    urpmi --auto-select --auto --no-verify-rpm
    the system upgraded my version of X to some special crapola that killed my ATI All-in-Wonder RADEON drivers. I learned how to use links really quickly, then I reinstalled everything.
    2) doing upgrade media on Mandrake Cooker (not unofficial, but normal users aren't supposed to use the Cooker sources unless they're expert types) upgraded my ATI All-in-Wonder RADEON drivers from the ones I installed last month to ones from a few months back. Grrr. I lost TV input from that, and I had to manually copy the correct driver files over.

    You'll note that both problems involve ATI. They suck. I mean, seriously. ATI made my life a living hell. Don't even ask me about the nightmare that I had with their drivers on Win2k....

    --
    -JC

  108. Mandrake Club by ballpoint · · Score: 1

    Try to imagine an accountant, an auditor and finally a tax inspector looking over that 'Mandrake Club' line for 'professional services' in the books. While the name is catchy and goes well with the yellow-star-on-night-blue-background theme, I would advise the company to choose a more business-like name for future products.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  109. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by TPFH · · Score: 1

    "Can he resist clicking on the bright, candy-colored window?"

    Don't Touch it! It's the History Eraser Window you fool!

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  110. Windows XP GUI is actually quite nice by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I personally like Windows XP's Luna theme very much. I do detest the annoying search dog, but I very much like the general look of Windows XP. I don't find it distracting: just pretty.

    I've seen Windows XP in classic mode, which isn't bad either, but I still prefer Luna over Classic.

    Its interesting to see different peoples' reactions to GUIs. I used to work with a guy who simply hated GUIs, regarding them as a waste of CPU power. He was always working in command-prompt windows and at home he had some ancient distribution of Linux without any GUI whatsoever. He was completely disgusted to see Microsoft add that shadow under the mouse cursor, which started with Windows 2000. He regarded it as a disgusting waste of CPU cycles.

    I, on the other hand, really like that shadow effect. Oooh, shiny!

  111. Download rate - another report by Sits · · Score: 1
    My experience has been slightly different.

    Things started out at around 20K/s before jumping to a massive 290K/s where it has stayed for about the past half an hour (its just hovered up to 310K/s which is probably faster than I want it to go). My upload rate has also been high hovering between 40K/s and 60K/s. The estimated time until completion is now just under 2 hours.

    I'm kind of curious as to how BitTorrent works these days though. In the past it used to allocate space for all the files you were downloading before it started transfering the files but at the moment it appears to be growing only the the file for the first CD.

    One thing though - where are the md5sums?! I know bittorrent technically doesn't need them since it checksums files anyway but I like to be doubly sure. Are these correct?
    40c8812dce7b9f8fb0a3b364af62b974 MandrakeLinux-9.2-17-Download-1.i586.iso
    e07fe7b1474eb3ba35cac3dfd479777e MandrakeLinux-9.2-18-Download-2.i586.iso
    2b6ffc5957533c927f14197ec99a0372 MandrakeLinux-9.2-19-Download-3.i586.iso
  112. Re:The lesson to be learned here by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    Debian specialises in old, but very stable packages.
    Gentoo 'stable' is a little bit back from bleeding edge; 'unstable' is bleeding edge, you can even easily use cvs versions as part of the package install system.

    So if you like to install packages as part of the main portage tree, dependencies included, a day or two after release, gentoo is for you.

    The user support community on the gentoo forums is the best I've seen for any distro, bar none.

    Yes, compiling is involved for upgrades, but you just nice it and leave it in the background, and on a half decent machine (1 gig upwards) you don't even notice its running with modern kernel scheduling.

    In the end of the day, if you want a very up to date setup, with the ability to easily tweak and fiddle (with lots of advice to backup), and have a reasonable machine, I'd recommend gentoo.

    If you want a machine with a very long uptime, low memory/cpu/drive space footprint and a good binaries package system, stick with debian. Obviously Mandrake, redhat and suse etc also have their own niches.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  113. Club Members not informed yet by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

    This is a bit strange but club memebers are normally sent a mail informing about important things but somehow they were haven't been informed about the torrents so far. Also the club website doesn't say anything about torrent links (atleast not teh memebers site). Which is probably why the download speed is still very low on bittorrent.

  114. Re:So let's give everyone access to it by iapetus · · Score: 1

    Although as has been pointed out elsewhere, the irony in this situation is that the more people are downloading and sharing the file, the more bandwidth is available for download.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  115. MOD PARENT INFORMATIVE by illtud · · Score: 1

    Please. It's true and informative and should be at least at score 2 like the parent.

  116. MD5SUMS by j0ebaker · · Score: 1

    I also computed the same md5sums off my download to confirm... I havn't seen official numbers for this yet.
    Here are my md5sum results.

    40c8812dce7b9f8fb0a3b364af62b974 MandrakeLinux-9.2-17-Download-1.i586.iso

    e07fe7b1474eb3ba35cac3dfd479777e MandrakeLinux-9.2-18-Download-2.i586.iso

    2b6ffc5957533c927f14197ec99a0372 MandrakeLinux-9.2-19-Download-3.i586.iso

    1. Re:MD5SUMS by bconway · · Score: 1

      You can dowload the GPL ISOs for at http://ihaveapenguin.servemp3.com/draketorrents/.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
  117. Linux Multi-Network Firewall by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    Gibraltar is a Debian-based CD firewall distribution. It is freely available and I use it on several boxes. There is supposed to be an upcoming version with a web interface that will cost around $100.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  118. Proprietary software stifles freedom of expression by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    I don't mind anyone improving their work. What I mind is being kept from making my own improvements (or having the opportunity to have improvements made for me), distributing those improvements to my friends, making copies of software, and running programs any time I want. Hence, I view all proprietary software as a problem, not just Microsoft Windows. Proprietary software is a significant part of the way in which proprietors push for control over your data and how you use your computer (i.e., DRM, forced upgrades, prevention of reverse engineering, just to name a few).

    Microsoft Windows happens to be some of the most widely used proprietary software available so it receives a lot of attention.

  119. Close to buying it, not any more by evil9000 · · Score: 1

    I was about to purchase a membership, when i noticed that KDE has no run command. Linux, without a run command? How else can i run the programs that i have compiled for the desktop without running the shell and launching it with a "&" at the end of it?

    I might as well wait for version 10, where they finally start modifying the kde desktop and make it usable vs modifying the fonts and widget settings and leaving it for the most part a virgin.

    1. Re:Close to buying it, not any more by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      Alt-F2
      by the way Alt-F2 starts a web browser showing the URL

    2. Re:Close to buying it, not any more by Theanswriz42 · · Score: 1

      It's real easy to put it back in.

      --
      Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for.
  120. Re:My review of Mandrake (in french, sorry) by PeteQC · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you think you can write anything stupid because you think no french-speaking person ever read Slashdot?

    Well, you must be the moron. It is not even French, it is a ridiculous translation from a read bad translator.

    You must have a lot of time to loose to insult Mandrake developpers and users in a language you obviously don't understant. I speak French (way better than Englis) and your post is real hard to understand.

    --- Ouais, tu crois que tu peux ecrire n'importe quoi d'idiot parce que tu crois que personne qui lit Slashdot ne sait lire le francais?

    Eh bien, tu dois etre epais. Ce n'est meme pas du francais, c'est une traduction ridicule d'un tres mauvais traducteur.

    Tu dois avoir beaucoup de temps a perdre pour insulter les developpeurs et les usagers de Mandrake dans une langue que tu ne comprend evidemment pas. Je parle francais (beaucoup mieux que l'anglais) et ton message est tres difficile a comprendre.

    --
    Montreal - Best city to live in!
  121. Re:I'm not impressed (mod parent up) by opkool · · Score: 1

    (mod parent up!)

    Exactly, Samba-3.0.0 is in the contrib section.

    Also, Buchan Milne (the guy who packages Samba+LDAP for Mandrake) has already built Samba-3.0.0 for Mandrake 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 9.0, 9.1 . See:

    http://us3.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/M an drake/

    I belive that Buchan is the one who packaged Samba for MDK 9.2's contrib.

    Peace!

  122. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    I do in some ways agree. I think Galaxy and Bluecurve are rather drab as well, as are most of the Gnome themes. I just don't like the overabundance of grey that most of them have. But I think Keramik/Geramik do a fine job making a brighter more curved feel, without making it so much like Aqua or Luna that it's ripping either off.

    Let INNOVATE rather than copy

    That right there's is pretty tough. Apple's managed to actually do something new and different with OS X's look and feel, but they're about the only ones who have managed to do so for quite a long time. I think we've got at least a chance of seeing interesting stuff coming out of karamba though.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  123. Slow Ass Torrent by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    There must not be many people in mandrake club downloading it. It's a 2gb file and I've got 28 hours left, (started it around 2pm). Only gettin 10-15kBps though I've been uploading at 20024kB/s consistantly.

    --
    I do security
  124. Errr... just a comment. by salgiza · · Score: 1

    > This is happening to anyone using Spain's Telefonica ADSL. This covers almost everyone in Spain.

    No offence, but there are much more options that Telefonica ADSL in Spain. There are at least other two big ADSL providers I can think of (Retevision, Wanadoo), and that's without counting all the cable companies that offer broaband. I know more people (with ADSL/Cable) that don't use Telefonica's services that people who do.

    P.S. It's true that Telefonica is the biggest ADSL provider, though. I've never understood why people keep using Telefonica ADSL when it's usually more expensive and quite worse (because it's the biggest provider, their lines get saturated faster).

  125. Re:not to burn karma on grammar bitchiness or anyt by G�tz · · Score: 2, Funny
    So if I join the club I get access to all the contributors and translators? Like, I can make them mow my lawn and stuff?
    I'm a contributor, so I'd really appreciate it if you'd clean my toilet. That's not my job, because it's a hardware issue.
  126. Re:Why oh why is the user interface still so stale by shibbie · · Score: 1

    For a bad UI design just look at Pocket PC 2002/Windows Mobile 2003. A HUGE star bar that takes about 1/6 of the screen and to stop tasks you have to go through three windows and use a "Memory" program. No ctrl alt del here....

  127. Re:Nice, but Gentoo hits the streets every day.... by blixel · · Score: 1

    The higher the number, the newer it is, or am I completely wrong about this?

    Then why don't you just run Windows 2003?

  128. Re:What's the big deal? by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

    Modded to flamebait...because I advocated paying Mandrake some money for their efforts, which I support. Nice.

  129. Re:all i want to know by jdictionary · · Score: 1
    Recuperate is not limited to health and is perfectly acceptable when referring to finance.

    (definition #2)
    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=recuperat e

    (definitions #3,#4)
    http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/recupera te

  130. Mandrake Bit Torrent Links by Zelet · · Score: 1

    Here are the Bit Torrent Links:

    Disk 1
    Disk 2
    and here

    This is where I found them.

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
  131. First Bit Torrent experience with Mdk 9.2 by nbrouard · · Score: 1

    I am currently downloading Mandrake 9.2 as a Club Member (6pm45 GMT). It displays
    Estimated time left: 46 hours 10min
    Download rate: 8 KiB/s Downloaded: 39.4 M
    Upload rate: 18 KiB/s Uploaded: 61.6 M

    If the ratio 61/39 is higher than one does it mean that the number of downloaders is increasing or is this ratio linked to differential speed between downloaders.

    Also the upload rate is higher than the download rate. What does it mean?

    1. Re:First Bit Torrent experience with Mdk 9.2 by nbrouard · · Score: 1

      At 8:46pm (GMT) that is 2 hours later after my first post here is the situation:
      Estimated time left: 23 hours 21 minutes
      Download Rate: 49 KiB/s Downloaded: 235.2 M
      Upload rate: 17 Kib/s Uploaded: 199.9 M

      So the Reproduction rate turned under 1 recently and is now 235/200. Also the Download rate is now higher than the Upload rate which seems to be constant.
      I still don't understand all but gained 23 hours (46-23) in 2 hours time, probably because of the growing number of downloaders.

    2. Re:First Bit Torrent experience with Mdk 9.2 by nbrouard · · Score: 1

      At 2:04 am i.e after 7 hours 15 minutes the situation is
      Estimated time left: 59 minutes 51 sec
      Download rate: 85 KiB/s Downloaded: 1819 M
      Upload rate: 20 KiB/s Uploaded: 582 M

      So it we be finished in 1 hour...

    3. Re:First Bit Torrent experience with Mdk 9.2 by nbrouard · · Score: 1

      At 2:46 am (GMT), after 8 hours the download of the 3 CD (2.045 Gb) is finished, but the upload is still working:
      Estimated time left: Download succeeded!
      Download rate: Downloaded: 2045.0 M
      Upload rate: 28KiB/s Uploaded: 633.2 M

      In conclusion I downloaded three times more than I uploaded. Ethically when should I stop others to upload? Never? I have other uploads to share on my web server. I will stop when the uploaded will be equal to the downloaded.
      Cheers!

  132. 9.2 torrent... or lack there of... by Macguyvok · · Score: 1

    'Bit' torrent... heh, how apt. Atleast for what I'm getting. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting 2 k/s or LESS for the last 5 hours.. still 0%... 4meg out of 2045meg.... Umm.. Anyone know how to help here? I mean this seems a VERY poor way to download 3 full ISOs... Oh, and FYI I'm on T-1. Nope, no badwidth limits. I download full ISO's off FTP in 30 minutes or less... why can't they just give us an FTP? Jeeze...

    --
    --Mac "Nine point eight meters per second squared: The Best Damn Windows Accelerator, Ever."
  133. Obvious Mistake? by xWeston · · Score: 1

    If you insert the first CD while in Windows, the autorun says "Mandrake Linux 9.1" at the top...

    This is fairly easy to catch and it made it to final!

  134. Bittorrent by tim_mw · · Score: 1

    This article is inaccurate, Mandrake Club members do not have full access to the ISO's, since they have only been released by as bittorrent downloads, which I can't because of our firewall here. If you are a mandrake club memeber and object to mandrake refusing to provide club members with a normal download, please sign the petition at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/mdkiso/