Slashdot Mirror


All-in-Wonder 9600 Pro Review

VL writes "From synthetic, to real-world game benchmarks. TV capture, DVD playback, and 2D/3D image quality... we covered all the bases with a review of All in Wonder 9600 Pro."

154 comments

  1. Odd by Soporific · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aren't there a million sites out there that do hardware reviews? Or is it a slow newsday?

    ~S

    1. Re:Odd by setzman · · Score: 4, Informative

      They saw that HardOCP pointed out the same thing today and had to get even.

      --
      C:\>
    2. Re:Odd by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      And it's not even a review of new hardware. The AIW 9600 Pro has been getting reviews for the last month and a half.

    3. Re:Odd by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Funny

      Adding to Mr Drudge's comment, the 9600 is also not a technological breakthrough. As far as ATI is concerned, this card is 2 generations off the current performance benchmarks.

      Next up, latest benchmarks and performance analysis on the new 1.2Ghz AMD CPU.

    4. Re:Odd by captainstupid · · Score: 1

      And my story about this review of Mario 64 was rejected.

      The nerve.

      --
      "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
  2. AIW by pheared · · Score: 2, Informative

    AIW has been a nice low cost video swiss army knife. If I weren't so happy with my ATI Radeon 9000 (and ATI's support of it with drivers!) I would get one of these.

    1. Re:AIW by tronicum · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have an AIW 8500DV and the Windows Driver suck to hell. MMC (Multimedia Center) breaks 2 times everyday, updating is a pain because it involves quite a lot of stuff (DirectX, Video Driver, Overlay Driver, MMC itself). I update once every 3-4 month and it takes a long time to get it running.

      I used it with Linux a bit, but Multimedia drivers and applications are better with Windows (recording MPEG2 in Software from an device etc.)

      I dont know if I would buy such a AIW again, I had an PCI AIW, now the AGP AIW but ATI is not supplying decent drivers for years.

    2. Re:AIW by slaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to do things in the proper order. The order goes like this:

      Catalyst, ATI WDM driver, ATI DAO supplemental files, ATI DVD decoder (if you don't have it), MMC.

      If you follow that order, nothing breaks. That's the order on ATI's site. Guess what? It works.

      I believe I've had noe of every model of ATI AIW. They do work very well. I'm not a gamer though, so I guess your milegage may vary.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    3. Re:AIW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are happy with the complete lack of dx9!?

    4. Re:AIW by Espectr0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If I weren't so happy with my ATI Radeon 9000 (and ATI's support of it with drivers!) I would get one of these.

      Huh? You may be the only one in luck to get good drivers for them. Fact is, everybody knows ati has the worst drivers in the industry. Just last week i wanted to upgrade my older AIW to the latest driver and multimedia application, and the installation of neither worked (told it couldn't detect the hardware, and i uninstalled the other version and launched vga mode like the docs said, so i had to install manually by upgrading them in the device manager), and even after i finally installed them, the tv application didn't launch with no error messages.

      I had to system restore my way out and install the original drivers on the cd.

    5. Re:AIW by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fact is, everybody knows ati has the worst drivers in the industry.

      Hi. 1999 called. They want thier information back.

    6. Re:AIW by pheared · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, I guess you are on Windows. I have not used Windows on my computers in several years so I can't comment on ATI's drivers for that Operating System, but it does sound like they are troublesome.

      The Linux drivers work just as advertised once you get them setup.

    7. Re:AIW by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I think this troll is stuck in a time warp...

      As a regular on rage3d.com, the only time I have heard of this is if you are trying to install drivers for the wrong card. If you have an original Radeon AIW, or the AIW 7500, you have to pay extra to get MMC 8.0+. If you try to download and install the version available on ATI's website, it won't work. You can still install MMC 7.x however.

      This really is fair, the latest MMC has a lot of new features and ATI has spent a great deal of time making their software top notch.

      Anyway, good luck.. and follow those instructions on the website, or post your question on rage3d.com.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    8. Re:AIW by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      If you have an original Radeon AIW, or the AIW 7500, you have to pay extra to get MMC 8.0+. If you try to download and install the version available on ATI's website, it won't work. You can still install MMC 7.x however.

      Well i read the documentation, and it clearly says that the AIW 7500 is supported, so i went out and got it!

    9. Re:AIW by JAgostoni · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I just blew all my Mod points ... even though I am an nVidia fan, I am going to have to agree with this one. ATI has started getting their act together while I feel that nVidia has not done a whole lot new with their drivers.

    10. Re:AIW by butterflytown · · Score: 1

      One thing to note is that they mantion that FM tuning is a NEW FEATURE. I'm sorry, new? what's so new about it? Hell it's not even New to ATI, their old ATI-TV cards had FM radio and I think many of their old AIW cards had it too. They're just re-vamping an old feature that they removed years Ago.

    11. Re:AIW by DarkVader · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I'm going to have to disagree.

      They STILL don't have a driver that handles video in for Mac OS X.

      I'm getting very tired of having to boot into 9 to watch TV.

    12. Re:AIW by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      Chock my response up to PC ignorance :P Actually, I still have a Voodoo 3000 in my Starmax :)

    13. Re:AIW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, I have the original Radeon AIW and am able to download (from ATI's site) and use MMC 8.0+ (currently using 8.6), good thing too since the 6 and 7 series' would contantly lock when using TV-on-Demand.

    14. Re:AIW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still use 8.1 though...

  3. Linux support by TheAcousticMotrbiker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is linux support for this beast ?
    Will it do decent GL ?

    1. Re:Linux support by mark_lybarger · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://gatos.sourceforge.net/supported_cards.php

      at video capture/tv tuner cards are supported by gatos. the 9700 is listed as "support on the way thanks to ATI", but nothing on the 9600. you might want to check the mail list archives or post to the list to see. i have aiw 128 pro and it works nicely w/ linux, though i haven't tried capture in a year or so. it was rough at the time i last tried it. i just want to easily record vcd compliant mpeg video from the input card. (via cron if possible). maybe that functionality exists now.

    2. Re:Linux support by Yarn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a user who wanted gentoo on their PC the other day. It had a 9600 based OEM card.

      You have to use the ATI binary drivers, and they're a little flakey from the gentoo package; if you ran the X server multiple times in succession the machine would lock up so only the magic sysrq could save you. However, the drivers downloaded directly from ATI's site seemed to work fine, despite being identical size.

      It could have just been fluke, I didn't have the time to debug the problem properly. I also didn't have time to do any benchmarking.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    3. Re:Linux support by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      Well, from a developer point of view it's pretty nice. GL_EXTENSIONS returned so much crap that my 1024 byte character buffer was too small. So one quick edit later - this is what it supports:

      GL_ARB_multitexture GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_S3_s3tc GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_shadow_ambient GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_vertex_blend GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_window_pos GL_ATI_draw_buffers GL_ATI_element_array GL_ATI_envmap_bumpmap GL_ATI_fragment_shader GL_ATI_map_object_buffer GL_ATI_separate_stencil GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once GL_ATI_vertex_array_object GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ATI_vertex_attrib_array_object GL_ATI_vertex_streams GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATIX_texture_env_route GL_ATIX_vertex_shader_output_point_size GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texgen_reflection GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_cube_map GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_rectangle GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_vertex_shader GL_HP_occlusion_test GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_occlusion_query GL_SGI_color_matrix GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_multitexture GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays GL_WIN_swap_hint WGL_EXT_extensions_string WGL_EXT_swap_control

      If you're an end-user and don't know what that means, then a 'yes' will probably make more sense to you. In terms of buzzwords, it does pixel and vertex shaders. Although you should be calling them fragment and vertex programs. Grrr.

      Can't say much for Linux support - I code Win32.

      /me dons asbestos trousers

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    4. Re:Linux support by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

      The km module is a bit rough yet. I don't have it compiled because it needs module versioning turned off in the kernel for some reason. You can't use AVview with cron, however, once the AVview app is launched you can use another program (like ffmpeg to do the recording.

      --

      Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  4. Linux drivers? by eddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do they test the linux drivers, or is this another one of those "there exists only one platform, and it's name is 3DMark"-reviews?

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Linux drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      AKA as "The only real skill we have is installing hardware and clicking on the 3DMark 2003 icon"-reviewers.

      The world is full of them. The only decent sites seems to be The Tech Report and Ars Technica who actually try to test the gear on something other than WindowsXP.

    2. Re:Linux drivers? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You make a valid point -- so far no review of modern video cards that I have ever been able to find has benchmarked the card on a Linux platform. Unfortunately, there are multiple valid reasons why they don't, the main ones being that the Linux drivers are still a little too involved to set up easily; the lack of game-independent benchmarks for Linux that work in a GUI; and finally, probably their belief that no one games on Linux anyway.

      Except for the id fans; thanks to teh Carmack, every single game they've written since Doom has been ported to Linux either during development or after the source code was GPLed. If ATi and NVIDIA (or even XGI) would clean up their drivers and work with either UnitedLinux, the LSB or the distro makers like SuSE and Mandrake to improve the installability of the driver for Linux n00bs, the benchmark companies might begin releasing game-independent benchmark ports like 3DMark and Aquamark, and companies would be encouraged to port to Linux or make their source code available to folks who will (like icculus).

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    3. Re:Linux drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they test the linux drivers, or is this another one of those "there exists only one platform, and it's name is 3DMark"-reviews?

      Are you too lazy to read the article yourself?!

      No and no.

    4. Re:Linux drivers? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      You make a valid point -- so far no review of modern video cards that I have ever been able to find has benchmarked the card on a Linux platform. Unfortunately, there are multiple valid reasons why they don't, the main ones being that the Linux drivers are still a little too involved to set up easily; the lack of game-independent benchmarks for Linux that work in a GUI; and finally, probably their belief that no one games on Linux anyway.

      My experience of buying cutting edge hardware is that the drivers are almost without exception terrible for all the platforms, including Windows. By the time the drivers have been debugged to the point that the latest $400 card is actually usable without causing repeated system crashes the board is yesterdays news and a good deal cheaper.

      The problem with the benchmark mentality is that speed is NOT the most important feature, ability to run software reliably is rather more important.

      These reviews are for the type of people who believe that the right size for their living room TV is one inch larger than their brother's.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  5. And just in time for Xmas too... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Strange, this "timing" lark. I wonder if they struggle to meet the deadline or just let thngs hang around until the public start buying in earnest for Xmas...

    Since it supports 2 monitors (prime requirement for me) I might even buy one... be nice to actually enable 3D to more than "minimal" for a change :-)

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:And just in time for Xmas too... by Mr.Zuka · · Score: 1

      The article seems to mirror a press release pretty heavily. What I want to know is how this card compares to others. The article spends most of its time comparing it to other older ATI cards. (Surprise it does better). What other cards out there allow for video input but are still good for gaming? Anyone?

  6. I have one question... by clifgriffin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are the Windows XP drivers up to snuff with this release? Previous All in Wonder drivers have sucked and have been unreliable for programattic access. I had to switch last year to another capture card manufacturer. Clif Blogzine.net Fortress of Insanity

    1. Re:I have one question... by puto · · Score: 1

      Well,

      I have about six boxes at home. With a range of Video Cards. Geforce to ATI.

      All in Wonder 8500, and All in Wonder 9800 Pro.

      Both work fine under XP. The 8500 pro is running on a media box and I have not had anything go wrong with it. Mind you all this box does is video and audio, so it does not have the plethora of other conflicting packages running around.

      The 9800 pro AIW is on an XP surfing gaming box and no problems with it as well.

      The Geforce 4200 is on a linux box and no problems.

      I have tried both and although there was a time ATI had problematical drivers they really stepped to bat with the Catalyst. And ATI just has better image quality IMHO.

      My 9800 pro is awesone as was the bundle included which is a nice editing suite, lets me burn DVDs, and it just works.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  7. Down already... by Tet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you thought you'd submit a story to Slashdot to get some visitors to your site. Well done. Yes, it's a cheap way to get some publicity for a vaguely tech related site. But didn't it occur to you to ensure it could survive the slashdotting before you submitted the story?

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Down already... by Grant29 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I think your right. Anyways, why not go to Rage 3D? They are an ATI dedicated site. They have very active forums there for user-to-user support.

    2. Re:Down already... by minus9 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They also have a very good Linux forum for thrashing out ATI issues. Without them I would have never known about the schneider-digital drivers for my graphics card and would have been stuck with with an older version of XFree86 or no 3D acceleration. Thankfully the official ATI drivers seem to have gone "legit" now.

    3. Re:Down already... by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the article (but hey, who does?), but after reading your post I felt like I should give it another hit. Unfortunately it loaded. . . so I refreshed it.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  8. Re:Could it be....? by kc78 · · Score: 1

    Why get the 9600 with quad piping when you can the 9700 with the 8x piping.

  9. This card has been out for quite a while by DaveCBio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's so special about this review?

  10. No DVI... (Off-topic) by MattRog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those of us with DVI LCDs is there a good 3D card which supports dual DVIs? I have two Iiyama DVI 19" LCDs and my current card (GeForce4 Ti 4600) only supports one DVI and one VGA (so one display is perfect and the other noticeably less so). This (yuck!) only supports dual VGA!!!

    I've been looking but I can't find a flavor of Radeon or GeForce that supports dual DVI. With the latest fantastico-new games (like Deus Ex2, Half-Life 2, Doom 3, etc.) being released in the near-term I'd really like to upgrade (replace) my older PC - I'd like to get dual DVI out and superb gaming performance/graphics (so it would have to be on par with the 9600's etc.).

    Any ideas/help?

    --

    Thanks,
    --
    Matt
    1. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      Google is your friend. ASUS has plans to release a video card based on the R360, the chip used on the Radeon 9800XT. Link.

      You can also get a product listing straight from ASUS, here. This page lists Dual DVI as an option for the R360-based card, but if you look around you should be able to find info for other cards.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      how much are you willing to spend?

      we bought an nvidia fx 5900 ultra (i think. whatever was 'high end' a month ago) about a month ago to run this software for mer ... the card was expensive as hell, but it's so damn sweet. the card was an $800 option on the dell we purchased for it. the card drives 2 dell 1901 flat panels (which i highly recommend)

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    3. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by Tet · · Score: 1
      This (yuck!) only supports dual VGA!!!

      Perfect. I might even consider getting one then. I've been looking for a dual head ATI card for a while that supports 2 x VGA. I don't have a DVI screen, and don't wish to put up with the inferior quality that a flat screen gives. So far, I'm driving my CRTs with a Matrox G450, but I'd like something a bit faster. To date, most Radeons have only been 1 VGA and 1 DVI...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    4. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by enodev · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a nice list:

      http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?s=&threadi d= 33992

      I'm just getting a dual-dvi ti4600 from gainward...

    5. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by georgep77 · · Score: 1

      Actually all radeons that support two displays support dual vga. If you get a retail version it includes a DVI-->VGA dongle. This dongle isn't present in most OEM versions but can be ordered directly from ATI.

      Cheers,
      _GP_

    6. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      There is a such thing as a DVI->VGA converter... hell, I have 2 of them that came with my dual-dvi video card (It's a GeForce4 MX440 though), and you can order them from newegg if you wanted.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    7. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by MattRog · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. Unfortunately the products listed are mostly sub-Radeon9000 quality and/or non-existant (the Ti4600 they list doesn't look like it is sold any more?).

      Do you have the URL to the Ti4600?

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    8. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by jdcook · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI: I bought the Gainward and had huge problems. And because I was an idiot, I was unable to return it. Be wary.

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    9. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by enodev · · Score: 1

      The Quadro FX Line from PNY is quite existant, also the ATI FireGL cards. I got my Ti4600 (Geforce 4 PowerPack! Model Ultra/750-8X XP "Golden Sample") from the shop at gainward.de.

    10. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Why do you need dual accelerated LCDs? Few-to-no games actually support multi-monitor 3D. Granted, you can force some 3D shooters like Q3 to span two monitors, but why would you? You're focus/crosshair would be split down the center. (I guess 3 monitors would be ideal, but you'd need a heck of a card to drive a 3D display at 3840x1024 or higher.)

      A better bet would be to get a nice 3D AGP card (ATI Radeon 9600/9700/9800) for gaming on one monitor, and a cheap PCI, DVI-out card for driving the second LCD in desktop mode. A $60 ATI 9000/9100/9200, a Gfx5200, or any old Matrox card would do fine. WinXP has pretty good multi-card/multi-monitor capabilities. So does Linux.

      You'll probably spend less money AND get better performance if you go with two cards, instead of trying to find one that does it all.

      Also, here's a nice link for multi-monitor tips/software.

    11. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by MattRog · · Score: 1

      Are the FX/FireGL any good, though
      (e.g. I want something at least as good as the 9600, for I expect to keep this system for many years)? I'm not up on the latest nVidia vis-a-vis Radeon.

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    12. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by matt2413 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Matrox's Parhelia series of cards. They are technically tri headed as the 2nd DVI connector forks off to two 15pin VGA connectors.

      Expensive though at 350 or so. Yes there is linux support.

      --
      Matt
    13. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by captainstupid · · Score: 1

      Try ATI's FireGL line.

      They're expensive, offer dual DVI and are based on the 9700 and 9800 (top of the line 3d performance).

      --
      "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
    14. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by Eight+01 · · Score: 1

      How is ATI's support for multiple monitors under Win2K?

      I'm mainly interested in using dual monitors for productivity (code in one monitor, interface in the other).

      Is an ATI card good enough at this to make a dual-monitor setup worth it, or should I get a single, larger monitor instead?

    15. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by enodev · · Score: 1

      here is a review, decide for yourself.

      http://www.3dchips.net/content/review.php?id=63& pa ge=1

    16. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes there is linux support.


      Wrong. The linux drivers are absolute shit; no xv support, no bus-mastering across both displays so that all window operations on the second display are slow as molasses, only compiles against certain kernel versions, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. Check out Matrox's message boards and see the discontentment. I both a P650 and returned it in disgust after two weeks of jumping through hoops to get abysmal performance.
    17. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      There are also VGA-DVI converters out there for those who might want to hook a 9600AIW to their LCD (like me). However, anyone know how much the image quality suffers compared to a similar card with native DVI-out?

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  11. Linux Drivers for PVR functionability by acherrington · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the card is great and has a ton of functionability. But when the time came for me to buy a PVR card, I had to skip on this one in favor of the hauppauge wintv pvr 350 PCI card and a seperate video card solution.

    I had to do this dasterdly deed due to the current state of linux driver support (ie lacking). Is anyone developing drivers for this or is ATI creating a too fast of moving target. Does anyone have any alternative solutions?

    --


    Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
    1. Re:Linux Drivers for PVR functionability by colinduplantis · · Score: 1

      Check out this site for linux ATI drivers.

      --
      If you love something, let it go. If it comes back to you, hump its leg.
  12. teh g00gle c4ch3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intro

    Page 1

    Page 2

    Page 3

    stuff to bypass the uber-cool lameness filterstuff to bypass the uber-cool lameness filterstuff to bypass the uber-cool lameness filterstuff to bypass the uber-cool lameness filterstuff to bypass the uber-cool lameness filter

  13. Review of a review? by Fancia · · Score: 4, Funny
    review of All in Wonder 9600 Pro Review"
    A review of the All in Wonder 9600 Pro review? I know we want to keep tabs on fair reviews, but isn't this a bit much?
    --

    Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    1. Re:Review of a review? by grub · · Score: 1, Funny


      Think of it as meta-moderation. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  14. review of Review? by FreeBSDbigot · · Score: 2, Funny
    review of All in Wonder 9600 Pro Review

    Is it a review of a card, or a review of a review? If the site weren't slashdotted, I could tell...

    --
    Orange whip? Orange whip? Three orange whips.
  15. Re:No DVI... (Off-topic) - Dual DVI by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

    From Matrox's website Matrox Millennium G550 Dual-DVI Matrox has always been a great competitor in the 2D desktop... dual-head technology is strictly Windows based for this card though.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  16. ATI's AIW has always been... by MindSlap · · Score: 3, Informative

    My capture board of choice..
    I'm currently on my 3rd AIW ATI card. Good bang for the buck and darn good perfomance.

    I've used other boards like Osprey but ATI's gear always seems to do it better, and tends to have better bundled software and 3rd party support.

    Up until recently, The Mach chipset in older AIW's was 'ok' for gaming. But I wasnt much into gaming. I preferred em for capturing.

    But now.. They have a great cap card AND gaming card!

    I'd say ATI today, is what Voodoo was a few years ago..

    1. Re:ATI's AIW has always been... by Your+Anus · · Score: 1

      Does AIW have any digital rights denial "features?" If so, how does one shut them off. I am thinking of Macrovision, DTV Broadcast Fag, etc.

      --

      In the USA, we like stuff watered down, like beer, television, and freedom.
    2. Re:ATI's AIW has always been... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, a few years ago wasn't voodoo on its last legs?. . .

    3. Re:ATI's AIW has always been... by slaker · · Score: 1

      ATI capture cards obey Macrovision, yes. This is trivial to circumvent, however. From time to time someone releases a circumvention patch that works in software, even.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  17. probably not by t0ny · · Score: 1
    You probably wont see that as a common feature for quite some time. It *may* eventually happen once CRTs start using DVI

    http://www.siimage.com/documents/SiI-WP-001-A.pd f

    but it will probably take about two years to gain any serious market penetration. Even superior technology needs time to gain acceptance; look at the fact that SATA drives still arent prevalent as a good example, in spite of being clearly superior. In fact, it wouldnt be hard at all to make a drive that is both ATA and SATA, just like it wouldnt be hard to make a CRT that is both VGA and DVI.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:probably not by Patik · · Score: 1
      You probably wont see that as a common feature for quite some time. It *may* eventually happen once CRTs start using DVI.
      I doubt that will drive it. LCDs are becoming more and more common while CRTs are becoming more and more scarce. Most LCDs can handle 3D games quite nicely, despite what the zealots still clutching their 800-lb behemoth might tell you. Also, every Joe Nongamer is buying an LCD with their new computer these days, so I doubt much new innovation will be made on CRTs since that is not where the market is heading.
    2. Re:probably not by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Not entirely true. Personally, my brother just purchased a computer system (I spec'd out the stuff and assembled it for him). On the issue of a monitor, however, I told him it was his decision. In the end, he decided on a nice 19" monitor that was around $200, rather than pay ~$500 on a 17" LCD.

      Basically, CRTs are still a good option; after all, its a mature technology. While his new monitor takes up considerably more desktop real estate than an LDC would, it is still not as deep as my old 17" monitor. The new generation of CRTs has much that people want- they are lower in price, have flat screens, and take up much less room than they used to.

      Until LCDs can beat out CRTs in terms of price, there will still be a market for CRT displays. Thats why DVI for CRTs is pretty good news, and why that will need to happen before DVI can take off with mainstream acceptance.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    3. Re:probably not by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      LCDs are nice but I'm not paying those prices yet.

      Some CRTs had DVI but it simply isn't worth it IMO because it still means needing ADC in the monitor too.

      I've seen many dual DVI cards, I really don't see what the problem is in finding them. If you want video capture, I'd suggest the LifeView FlyVideo 2000.

      Unless there is a space or lack of slots reason to have video capture and computer display on one card, keeping them separate allows more affordable upgrade paths.

  18. More than games. by eddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, if the "drivers are a little too involved to set up" then that's certainly something the review should mention!

    This isn't all about games either, this isn't a hardcore gaming card, this is a "wide" product meant to be an overall decent graphics card for desktop and games. You have the PVR features for instance. Are those supported on any other OSen than Windows? If yes, out of the box or does it require third party drivers and/or software, will the remote function with these? If it's not supported, why? How does that compare to the competition, etc, etc.

    A review that doesn't even touch on these issues are all but useless. Zero information, seeing how there's a million of these reviews already.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:More than games. by The+One+KEA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. Unfortunately, it's a chicken-and-egg problem: the game companies won't release Linux games because there isn't enough marketshare, but since there's no Linux games no one tries to game under Linux, so the game companies won't release Linux games....

      Honestly, I don't know how well-supported the AIW cards are by the ATi Linux drivers -- and such support won't appear until enough people get together and make ATi aware of the fact that people want this functionality.

      Hopefully, sooner or later someone will actually write a review on how easily the latest & greatest video hardware can be installed on the major distros and how fast they are -- this is a biggie because the toolchain and options used to compile the X server, the kernel, the drivers and the libraries make a BIG difference. Fortunately, games like UT2K3 do run under Linux AND they have integrated benchmarking capabilities. So the review wouldn't be totally bereft of benchmarks.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:More than games. by eddy · · Score: 2

      You're still focusing on games. I think most people who go for the "All-in-Wonder" are more concerned with the extra features; like the PVR and the remote.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    3. Re:More than games. by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      I focused on games because right now games are the major push to get decent Linux driver support for these AIW cards. If enough people began clamoring for PVR, the double requesting might bring about some increased driver support.

      Like I said before, it's a chicken-and-egg problem.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    4. Re:More than games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no. The problem is that Linux only accounts for less than 5% marketshare on the desktop. Even if every Linux user in the world stepped up and said 'We'll buy the games.' the publishers still wouldn't publish for Linux because they don't need $100 that badly.

    5. Re:More than games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are those supported on any other OSen than Windows?

      This single word rendered your post utterly meaningless and gay.

    6. Re:More than games. by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      Suppose there are 100 million computer users. Then there are nearly 5 million linux users. Then revenue, if every Linux user in the world bought one copy of a given game, would be half a billion dollars. Quite enough to cover the cost of a port.

      You, and most other posters here, miss the point. People Don't Want Games. I have never felt the need to install any games on my system, with the possible exception chess (xboard) and solitaire (kpat). The majority of Linux users, and for that matter the majority of computer users, are like-minded: either they only use a computer to check email and word process, or they are intelligent enough to find shooting games to be rather dull and boring compared to all the fascinating information one can access with a computer.

  19. In real news... by vasqzr · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    There's a new kid on the block when it comes to graphics cards.

    XGI Volari

    1. Re:In real news... by vasqzr · · Score: 1, Interesting




      http://www20.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031107/ind ex.html

      Of course a link is helpful.

      http://www.xgitech.com/

      Benchmarks look promising.


      Conclusion

      The Volari Duo V8 Ultra leaves us with a very mixed first impression. Despite the prototype status of our sample and its driver, the card was able to produce some very respectable results in some areas. These highlights are clouded by the problems with texture filtering and the stark performance drop-offs in some benchmarks and games.

      XGI's driver team definitely has its work cut out for it. We can expect to see final boards with shipping status and WHQL drivers within the next one or two months, or so. That gives XGI's driver programmers a bit of time to iron out the kinks.

      Should they be successful, XGI's cards may well become serious alternatives to ATi's and NVIDIA's offerings, especially considering their comparatively low prices. XGI is aiming for a street price of about $449 (plus tax), which is rather inexpensive. This makes XGI's top model a good $50 less expensive than the flagship models of NVIDIA or ATi. As far as the other versions of the cards are concerned, XGI has so far declined to comment.


    2. Re:In real news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This makes XGI's top model a good $50 less expensive than the flagship models of NVIDIA or ATi.

      Oh wow, a big huge 50$ less on a near-500$ videocard. Might as well try my luck with these new guys! NOT!

      If they had half-price videocards that performed at about 75-80% the same as ATI/nVidia cards, sure I'd take a chance at it.

      But not at those prices.

  20. dremel tool by zontroll · · Score: 1

    "A Dremel is something these users will need to keep handy. Remember, the Dremel is for the SFF case, and not to lop off the FM-Tuner."

    I'm surprised he rated the card so well, considering case modifications are required to make it fit in the SFF case. Your average gamer/PC user will not want to go through the hassle of cutting part of the case to make it fit. They'll probably just return it if they can't make it fit immediately.

    1. Re:dremel tool by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      How many average gamer/pc users have an SFF case? All the ones I know don't... most of them have a Dell.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:dremel tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Many people are buying from generic manufacturers and a lot of them are using sff cases.

  21. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeebus! And this is insightful how?

  22. HDTV support by exhilaration · · Score: 1

    Damn it, where's my HDTV support?????

    1. Re:HDTV support by crow · · Score: 2, Informative

      HDTV support will be limited in capture cards for some time, and I'll explain why:

      HDTV is sent in a MPEG-2 format, so if you can get the raw transport stream, you don't have to do any fancy encoding. So in theory, an HDTV capture card is less complicated than a traditional NTSC/PAL capture card. Unfortunately, there are several different standards for encoding the transport stream. For broadcast television, the standard is ATSC, and you can get several ATSC tuner cards, including one specifically for Linux. For cable TV, the standard is QAM, which applies to all digitial cable, not just HDTV. There are currently no QAM capture cards, and the minute they enter the market, the cable companies will start encrpyting the channels (some already are). Eventually, you should be able to get a QAM card that is cable addressable, so it will essentially be your set-top box in a card.

      Oh, and I have no idea about how satellite encodes HDTV, though I assume that like cable, it uses the same method as with regular digital channels (they're all MPEG).

      Perhaps someday someone will develop a card that takes a full decoded HDTV signal and re-encodes it into MPEG for you, but that would take a lot of processing power. (I heard one estimate that the work required is roughly the equivalent of a 6GHz processor--I read it on the Internet, so it must be true.)

    2. Re:HDTV support by pyite69 · · Score: 1


      All I really want is some kind of MPEG hardware
      playback of ATSC streams to component video - on
      Linux. Do you know of any progress in this area?
      I already have the pchdtv.com card, which works
      well enough, but non-accelerated playback onto a
      21" monitor isn't quite as useful as true component
      video.

    3. Re:HDTV support by crow · · Score: 1

      I'm still researching this, as I haven't started purchasing the parts for my HTPC (home theater PC). My understanding, though, is that some of the GForce cards have support that helps with MPEG playback. If someone who knows more reads this, please post.

    4. Re:HDTV support by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 1

      Here's what I'm looking for. I just bought a big monster HDTV for my rec room and I want to play TFC on my PC and use the HDTV for the monitor. Maybe even use it for everyday web browsing, too. It has a DVI input, but not the same one this card has. Does ATI or anyone else have a card that will do that?

    5. Re:HDTV support by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure about the 9600, but my All-in-Wonder 9700 came with an HDTV output adapter as well as one for regular TV (for the 9700, it's a squid-like thing that plugs into a port on the back of the card and branches into various video and audio outputs).

      Oh, here we go...

      Q6: What modes does the HDTV Component Video Adapter support?
      A6: ATI's HDTV Component Video Adapter supports the standard analog component modes of 480i (interlaced), 480p (progressive), 720p and 1080i.
      Q7: What modes can I watch DVDs in?
      A7: DVD playback is supported in 480i and 480p modes due to Macrovision restrictions.

  23. Text of the multi-page article (sans graphics) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 Pro: Like the AIW 9800 Pro, this mainstream offering supports DX9 and has some great A/V capabilities. It also has a couple of unique features that separates itself from the rest of the AIW line.

    Date: November 21, 2003
    Manufacturer: ATI
    Written By: Hubert Wong
    Price: $205 USD

    The All-In-Wonder series have been a great success for ATI. Recently, they've been coupling some great TV-Tuning functionality with a modern VPU. This is a far cry from early All-In-Wonders (AIW) where the VPU was based on a handicapped version of their fastest card.

    Another smart decision was releasing different variants of the AIW cards, each targeting a different market segment. The AIW VE was aimed at the budget market, where potential users may not have an AGP slot available. This AIW lacked a remote, and used a two year old VPU, but it was priced very low, and the multimedia aspect matched the top-end AIW 9700 Pro (now discontinued in favour of the faster 9800 Pro VPU). The AIW 9000 was another mainstream part, but supported DirectX 8.1 gaming. This card suffered something of "middle child syndrome" and didn't seem to get as much fanfare as the other AIW parts. The AIW 9800 Pro is ATI's current top dog, matching their quality multimedia features with their most modern VPU (until the XT came out).

    Though the VPUs (and hence, the price) differed, what all three cards had in common was the TV-Tuner and the Theater 200 Video Processing Engine (VPE). Another thing they had in common, was the inability to output to dual CRT monitors. Considering that multimedia authors live and die with multi-displays, this was quite an omission in the AIW series. Today, we'll be looking at the AIW 9600 Pro, which has everything current AIWs have, and includes DirectX 9 support, Theater 200, FM-Radio (a new feature), and the previously MIA dual CRT display support.

    Specifications

    You can grab ATI's full specifications from their page, but I thought it would be good to outline a few important features.

    TV-ON-DEMAND: Exactly as it sounds. With the AIW 9600 Pro, you can record your favorite programs, and pause live TV (playing it back whenever you want) directly on to your hard drive. The Gemstar GUIDE Plus+ is a software and web based application that works much like a TiVO's TV guide.

    FM-ON-DEMAND: New to the AIW series is the AIW 9600 Pro's ability to listen to and record live radio. This works by attaching an antenna to the IO panel on the card. Unfortunently, this antenna isn't included, and you'll need to pick up your own.

    THRUVIEW: Like other AIW cards, you can view TV through a translucent overlay on your desktop. This will allow you to work on your primary window, while still being able to watch TV. In theory, this sounds great, but I found it too distracting to use in a practical environment.

    Remote Wonder: A fully wireless remote, that works by radio frequency, rather than infrared. That means the signal will pass through most walls found in homes, and at a range of about 30 feet. We reviewed it here, so check that review for our full thoughts.

    EAZYLOOK: Also known as the "10 foot interface". An issue with past ATI TV-Tuning based setups was the interface was too small to read on an actual television set. Add the typically low resolution of TVs, and you can see the problems. EAZYLOOK uses a much friendlier and simplified menu, and the font size is much larger, making it easier to use.

    MulTView: This is a feature that will enable dual TV tuner capabilities including Picture-in-Picture and independent channel surfing. Want to watch one channel, while recording another? You couldn't do it before, but now you can, so long as you have an additional ATI TV Wonder. Hopefully, this is something ATI can integrate into one card in the future.

    DirectX 9: The AIW 9600 Pro offers full DX9 support.

    The ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 Pro

    Unlike earlier ATI products, the shipping boxes are squarer now, as opposed to

  24. Notes... by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the TV Wonder VE, which is essentially the TV tuner part of this card (well it turns out to be more complicated than that, but for argument's sake).

    The applications for watching and recording TV shows suck. Real bad. I have the latest version from their website too.

    The best program I encountered was Snapstream, and it works with the card reviewed in this article. But it uses ACCESS and Jet to store tv shows, and can you guess what happened 3x before my trial period was over? That's right, corrupt database.

    One further note, these cards will NOT work with Myth TV, the linux option. The TV Wonder series does work with Myth, though.

    1. Re:Notes... by GarfBond · · Score: 1
      You're right. It *is* more complicated than that, especially since the latest version on the website for your card is significantly older than the latest version available for all-in-wonder cards, and a reasonable person might expect that the new version has a bunch of new features and, quite possibly, bug fixes.

    2. Re:Notes... by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      What's your point? The TV Wonder VE is not an obsolete product, its in their active supported (and sold) lineup. There might very well be a great reason why the latest software doesn't work with my card, but I don't care.

      The software is crappy, even if they fix the bugs. The interface sucks, the TV Tuner info overlay sucks. I told it to record a show for me, it put the show on my desktop. I try to open it with their player, it crashes. I try to play it in Quicktime (its a MOV file), Quicktime doesn't know what the hell it is.

      The program grid is horrible. although they did get one part right - the TV is visible in the upper LHC of the screen while you browse listings. Other than that Snapstream is on a whole other level of greatness.

      I had high expectations for ATI's software and for Snapstream. Both let me down. I hope MythTV changes my mind about PC Tuner software. That would be a hoot, since its free and open source.

  25. all in wonder when it will be reaonably priced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't ati figure out that there is a huge market for a top of the line video encode/video decode video card with marginal 3d performance for under $75?

    How else can we do mythTv or embedded systems manufacturers get their systems below $150 with a dvd burner?

    I would encourage ATI to pursue a high end all in wonder for 3d performance as well as a low end for price which does video encode/playback with excellent quality.

    1. Re:all in wonder when it will be reaonably priced by slaker · · Score: 1

      Try a SapphireTech Radeon 9200 VIVO. It's maybe $60.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    2. Re:all in wonder when it will be reaonably priced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheapest I found was $90 + shipping.

      Any idea how good it works?

    3. Re:all in wonder when it will be reaonably priced by slaker · · Score: 1

      Look for the 64MB ones. Allstarmicro.com had 'em a couple weeks ago for $56.
      The 64MB one has DVI and analog video, the 128MB version is analog only.

      They work beautifully. The biggest difference between a VIVO and an AIW is the tuner. If you have sattelite or digital cable or something, you aren't using the tuner anyway, you're using Svideo or composite, which the VIVO supports perfectly. The other difference is that the AIW cards have audio inputs. The fix for this is a $3.29 stereo-RCA-to-mini-headphone adaptor from Radio Shack. You were planning to use your sound card's line-in for something else?

      The 9200 uses the old Rage Theater chip found in the AIW 7500 and 8500DV (and for that matter, the ATI Rage Pro VIVO and AIW), not the Theater 200 found in the 9600, 9700, or 9800. Newer versions of MMC have a little bit of extra functionality with the updated chip - basically engaging the vidcap chip for some readtime processing on your input, for cleaning up noise and so forth. I prefer to do that sort of thing after the fact, when I have more control and the source video on-hand for comparison.

      If you aren't interested in 3D, and you don't need the tuner - and to be honest, the tuner in your VCR is better anyway - the 9200 VIVO is a bargain.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  26. Re:I would just like take a moment to say.... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    I overwhelm as I approach you
    Make your lungs hold breath inside!
    Lovers break caresses for me
    Love enhanced when I've gone by.

    You'll feel me coming,
    A new vibration
    From afar you'll see me
    I'm a sensation.

    They worship me and all I touch
    Hazy eyed they catch my glance,
    Pleasant shudders shake their senses
    My warm momentum throws their stance.

    I leave a trail of rooted people
    Mesmerised by just the sight,
    The few I touch are now disciples
    Love as One I Am the Light...

    Soon you'll see me, can't you feel me
    I'm coming...
    Send your troubles dancing he knows the answer
    I'm coming...
    I'm a sensation.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  27. Little out of date isn't it? by NYTrojan · · Score: 1

    I've had an AIW 9800 pro in my system for a while now. 9600 seems a few steps behind.

  28. Re:Odder by halo8 · · Score: 1

    Isnt it Most Oddest that this card was released a MONTH ago.. and with it 3 similar Reviews?? how is this news?

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  29. Buy a G4 or G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ATI Radeon cards that ship on PowerMac G4 and G5 in the past few years already have DVI and ADC. All you'd need is an adapter from ADC to DVI and you'll get dual DVI.

  30. May I make a suggestion - Radeon 9800 non-pro. by shadowlight1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had an AllinWonder Pro way back in the day. Used it to sample in some digital video and back up some of my VHS tapes to HD. Drivers sucked. When I got Windows 2000, it totally broke. Since then, I've avoided the whole thing by getting a digital camera with USB drivers. Much more flexible anyways, and you can plug in external sources into the dv camera and I'm back where I was with the AllinWonder.

    So here's my video card suggestion: Forget the 9600 AiW and go straight to a 9800 non-pro version. According to Tom's hardware, 20-30% performance difference over the 9600 graphically. Finally, do NOT get the Pro, XT, or SE versions of the 9800 unless you are a hardcore gamer. I was able to get a Radeon 9800/128 meg version for $185 on EBay!

    The lower clock speed of the 9800 vs 9800 Pro affects performance minimally, but you can also overclock the regular 9800 to have Pro-like speeds, from what I hear.
    Tom's hardware also indicated VIRTUALLY NO PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE between the 128 and 256 meg RAM versions of the RaDeon 9800 Pro card.
    ----
    Basically, the extra RAM, fluff features ATI puts on their cards is for the kiddies. If you want to buy in, go for it. Otherwise, be smart, take advantage of the core technology by getting the 9800 -- you'll get all the performance and save $200. Save your money for dedicated, portable peripherals.

    1. Re:May I make a suggestion - Radeon 9800 non-pro. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Newegg has the AIW 9700 non-pro for only $40 more than the AIW 9600 pro. 9800 AIWs are still way up in the $300 range.

      Also, in a year, games will include support for 256 megs of textures. That was the same argument said about every increase in onboard memory. Who needs 64 megs of vram? or 128? Now, thats standard. If you are going to go for the fastest video card, you might as well get the maximum available memory so you can continue to use the card for years to come.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:May I make a suggestion - Radeon 9800 non-pro. by slaker · · Score: 1

      One argument in favor of the 9600AIW is the fact that it doesn't draw NEARLY as much power as its bigger brothers. I have 9600, 9700 and 9800 (all Pro models) AIW cards.

      The 9600 doesn't get nearly as hot, doesn't need a power connection from the PSU, and has a less noisy fan. Heck, mine is passively cooled, even.

      If you're only interested in capture features, the 9600 has the same Rage Theater 200 chip as the other high-dollar ATI cards, without all the gamer stuff that goes with it.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    3. Re:May I make a suggestion - Radeon 9800 non-pro. by WolF-g · · Score: 0

      This is a not a very smart suggestion. ATI has had an excellent track record for drivers since the catalyst release which was long after windows 2000 stopped working for you, and...

      You don't take into account that this card has TV tuner with downloaded TV GuidePlus+ which adds TiVo functionality to your PC. That alone makes this card priceless.

      I would like however to see a version that works with satalite or digital cable.

    4. Re:May I make a suggestion - Radeon 9800 non-pro. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      9800se is cripled.

      though it's cheaper than other 9800's it goes on par with 9600 pro or so when it comes to actually doing something.

      however, there was/is an all in wonder 9800se for quite cheap with the ati remote controller(rc) to boot for quite cheap..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:May I make a suggestion - Radeon 9800 non-pro. by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I don't want people confusing 9800 non-Pro with 9800 SE, which strips it of some of its core technology. I still think Non-pro is a good buy, but NOT the SE.

  31. LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do hardware reviews only test the hardware out under Windows? Are there any hardware review sites that review hardware under Linux? Just because a piece of hardware performs nicely or efficiently under Windows doesn't mean the same applies under Linux.

    Things are Linux oriented hardware review should cover:
    1. Linux based synthetic benchmarks
    2. Benchmarks under popular Linux games
    3. OSS drivers (yes/no)
    4. Linux support (yes/no)

    1. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      I am sure the reason is that the device is designed to work under windows - not linux.

      -but- if your suggestion was carried out, maybe that eventually wouldn't be the case.

      --
      ymmv
    2. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by aceh0 · · Score: 1

      2. Benchmarks under popular Linux games it's not particularly insightful to know that tuxracer will run at 800 fps

    3. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not?

    4. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably has something to do with this.
      I, for one, am hoping that Windows 95 makes a comeback and beats Linux to 2%.
      GO WINDOWS 95!!!

    5. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by Eamon+C · · Score: 1

      You seem to have confused this with a site frequented by Linux users.

    6. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of graphically intensive games for Linux: the Quakes, the Unreals, Savage, etc... There are also many games that run under WineX. I bet most ATI users don't know that NVIDIA cards work better under WineX than ATI cards.

      I use Linux as my only desktop, and I would like to know what hardware I should buy. There are closed driver issues, support issues, and many other things that I need to evaluate before I buy.

      Heck, I would be willing to go with a slightly slower card if that meant I got open drivers and Linux support!

    7. Re:LInux Oriented Hardware Reviews by aceh0 · · Score: 1

      as someone who reviews hardware for a living, the problem is quake & unreal are not exactly cutting edge. framerates are in the 400s on highend systems for quake3 and 200s for UT2K3. im under the impression that most cutting edge games will not work under wine. furthermore there is an issue of economics. we are not a small site but testing takes a lot of time. is the market for how gaming videocards run under linux enough for the average site to invest time in? im not trying to flame or troll but it is an honest question.

  32. Re:I would just like take a moment to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click here

  33. Slightly off topic by back_pages · · Score: 1
    I am not a gamer and really couldn't care less about video cards. I am building a new computer for my brother for Christmas, though, and he will want to play games.

    Right up front we're making a comprimise on price, budgeting I have done my some research (that site, among others, seemed the most helpful) and I'm leaning toward the Asus V9250 or an MSI FX5200. Do keep in mind that this will be a Windows machine, as the guy is decidedly non-computer technicalish.

    So sure, this is slightly off-topic - don't feel obligated to respond or moderate. If you do happen to have a good suggestion as to the best video card value under one hundred bucks, please chime in. Thanks.

    1. Re:Slightly off topic by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Grr, formatting ate my "budgeting less than $100".

    2. Re:Slightly off topic by eqkivaro · · Score: 1

      You can pick up a GF4Ti4200 card for about $70, or a (much slower, but fast enough for most modern games) GF4 MX440 card for about $40. You should pick the card up through an online vendor, since storefront retailers don't stock these cards now. if your brother is going to be playing half-life 2 when it comes out, then make sure you get a directX 9 card like the ATI 9600 card.

  34. GF4 ti4200 VIVO experience by paradesign · · Score: 1
    I have a gf4 4200 vivo that i just love, gaming performance is great, dual monitiors (with a DVI/VGA convertor), nice drivers. But i will honestly not buy another one, nor reccomend it. The included softwaer BLOWS. ATI has their 1st party developed media center software that is wonderful. Nvidia gives you a hodge podge of 3rd party crap that didnt include half the registration numbers, so now im illegaly running software that i paid for! I wish that i could get the ATI software to be compatabe with it, or there was a free alternative that was comparable. Ive found this shareware "tv viewer" software that handles input to fullscreen great, except requires that i pay to stop flashing messages at me. I also use VirtulaDub for all of my capturing. Tvout is handled in the driver and works fine.

    does anyone else here have one of these cards? how do you use it?

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  35. Welcome to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the editors are idiots and affiliate sales from Barnes and Nobles and Thinkgeek run rampant. The only reason they get any traffic is because people have nothing better to do. A better tech/geek discussion site would bury them.

  36. Or better yet....9500 and soft-mod it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got the 9500, red circuit board, L-shaped memory and implemented W1zard's "soft mod" to open up all 8 pipelines and overclocked it. Now it runs faster than a 9700 and only cost $99. The drivers even recognize it as a 9700 :-)

    1. Re:Or better yet....9500 and soft-mod it. by Elroy+Jetson · · Score: 1

      That was a great suggestion back when the 9500 Pro was still in production. Problem is, people figured that out, and that (along with the stop of production) drove up prices. Then there's the little problem of the stock 9500 Pro being faster than the stock 9600 Pro in most benchmarks. Back in mid-April, Anandtech said "The Radeon 9600 Pro is the perfect example of bigger numbers not necessarily meaning higher performance; as we noted in our overview of the RV350's technology, the Radeon 9600 Pro is actually more like a regular Radeon 9500 than a Radeon 9500 Pro."

      Currently, the cheapest 9500 Pro 128MB lists at $199 on pricewatch... only $10 cheaper than the cheapest AIW 9600 Pro 128MB. If you found the 9500 for $99 recently, or bought it back before the prices rose, consider yourself one of the lucky ones.

  37. DScaler TV Tuner by N8F8 · · Score: 1
    DScaler is a wonderful TV free (as in beer GPL)TV tuner. Deinterlacing, full screen, the new Alpha version 4.0 has all the bell and whistles.
    DScaler

    A good Media player that I like is Core Media Player. But media players are getting to be a dime a dozen. Video Lan Client isn't too bad.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:DScaler TV Tuner by paradesign · · Score: 1
      Ive looked at descaler, but it is not compatable with the chipset in the AIW or VIVO cards. But it seems to do everything i need... almost.

      VLC is a godesend, it never leaves the flashdrive arround my neck (both mac and PC versions). Ill have to check out CMP though, it looks neat.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
  38. Sticking with my modded 9500 by teklob · · Score: 1

    I got a Radeon 9500 (the variant built on a 9700 PBC) and re-enabled all the disabled features. Instant 9700pro+ after overclocking. Better than a 9600 and cheaper too.
    hacked drivers @ http://www.ocfaq.com/softmod/download.php
    of course it doesnt do tv capture

  39. Re:I would just like take a moment to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry dude, the flash movie is 404.

  40. Not recomended - bad past experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I am now on my 3rd "ATI All-in-wonder" (8500DV). I DO NOT recommend it or any ATI all-in-wonder. Why? My current card sucks, pure and simple.

    My current setup is WORST after my upgrade:
    Before: ATI-AIW 128 'pro' with an Athlon 600 (Win 98)
    Now: ATI-AIW-Radeon 8500 DV, with an Athlon 2000 (Win 2000)

    Both have the "latest drivers"

    - The only good thing about the card is the 3D (Radeon), my gaming experience really got better.

    - The worst is the DVD Playback. (Both cards have an imbedded hardware decoder), it is choppy, mainly during high-speed action (The matrix looked very good on my old system, but I cannot watch it anymore). If I used my PC for more than 1 hour before listening to a movie, it looses frames every few seconds. I must reboot before starting to listen to movies, and it does not always work.

    - If I use the DVD player buttons to fast (fast forward, pause rewind real fast) the screen fills with green dash ( "-" ) or underscore ( "_" ).

    The green will be present on DVD playback and TV until I reboot the PC. Often the whole DVD player will hang the PC, usually the same movies in the same area (problem with error corrections?)

    - Furthermore the TV recording capabilities got a lot worst, my recordings will often be more choppy than before, I have to set lower resolutions / fps to be sure not to miss many frames (or sound).

    - The menu have an annoying feature, each time I re-open the TV-Tuner and maximize I must re-position the menu. It is placed by default in the middle of the screen (I think at the bottom of a 800x600 screen).

    [2003 Update:]
    - I got so tired of the bad DVD playback, I now have bought a set top player. My decision was triggered when recently bought DVDs was giving an "Invalid decoder key" message! I could not watch many DVD's on my PC anymore. (I believe this was a Windows driver problem, I made several re-install and it always after one of the "security update" that I got the problem).

    - I jumped on the card upgrade when it came out: 450$. The biggest problem are the drivers. This is obvious because of all the software related problems that show up with time and disappear after a reboot or a full re-install (I must do this every 6 months).

    All available upgrades does nothing for my problems, upgrading for me is only a question of "hope" and interface look, all the real problems are still present.

    I got really pissed off when ATI decided (18 months later) that I could get the latest software (3rd update generation) ONLY by sending then 5$ for a CD (you must enter the original CD to install many multimedia software items).

    - Even worst that I had to install Win2K since ATI does not support more than 3 generation of OS and XP was not an option, I did not want to shell out the hundreds of $ it costs (I got a free Win2K original CD from work).

    1. Re:Not recomended - bad past experience by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Okaaaaaay....so...

      "Fool me once, shame on you"
      "Fool me twice, shame on me"

      How gullible to you have to be to fall for ATI's cr@p three times in a row?

      Sorry, just couldn't resist. It's been one of those days.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Not recomended - bad past experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, people - Windows has much better hardware support than Linux. Sure. I'll bet it does.

  41. Anything better than mp2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any chance of one of these cards ever coming with something better than mp2 encoding/decoding?

  42. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the horsepower of the new cards, and all the bells and whistles, I'm wondering howthese things do for CAD/3D as opposed to a FireGL 8800 for example,for my home PC.

  43. ATI Card? Not for me and never again by linux_author · · Score: 1

    - i'm still waiting to be able to use the PCI AIW card ATI released this time last year... - i was quite naive in assuming ATI cared about the Linux market, and bought the card... it works fine as a video card, but AIW? TV capture/viewing? nope! - PC hardware manufacturers should heed a warning: Don't ignore your current and potential future market. Do support Linux, or you may find that your company has developed an unsavory reputation along with way... - i cannot recommend ATI as a "Linux savvy" manufacturer

    1. Re:ATI Card? Not for me and never again by MeatMan · · Score: 0

      "-i was quite naive in assuming ATI cared about the Linux market". Funny stuff. Why should they care about the "Linux market"? There is no "Linux market" worth the extra money, time, and effort to R&D anything for Linux users. You are naive.
      "Don't ignore your current and potential future market. Do support Linux, or you may find that your company has developed an unsavory reputation along with way...". Current & potential market? You mean like when they used to sell Yugo's? That kind of "current and potential market"? Um, like they care if they develop an "unsavory reputation" amongst the whole 4,350 Linux users in the world? sheesh ... make me laugh

  44. I own one and it's got "issues". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just bought it. Followed all the advice on Nvidia driver removal, etc.. And it's buggy! I can't run the TV on demand because it freezes after a minute or so. I can't run the Guide+ out of the TV because it goes into an infinite loop. But, worst of all, I keep getting a 2nd level tech named Shabu who's advice is just plain garbage. He keeps feigning amazement at these issues because he has never experienced them on his crappy system at home running ME. He has no concept of SW and programming and so it's like banging your head into a brick wall trying to convey these problems to him. Unfortunately, ATI's tech support runs out after 30 days and then you need to call an expensive 900 #. I say stay away from ATI and save your money. Too much hassle and too much BS.

  45. My opinion and linux question by glsunder · · Score: 1

    I've got a 9800pro aiw, and I'm pretty happy. I also have a 8500 aiw and a rage 128 aiw. The biggest deal with AIW cards is that if you have digital cable, you mainly use it as a video in card (atleast we do, the extra HBOs, HistInt, IFC etc are digital here). Older versions of the MFC software were pretty screwy, but the latest versions (since summer/fall 03 or so) have been pretty good.

    I haven't done much research into using AIW cards on linux boxes, but will be trying soon once we build a linux server from my wife's old computer parts and my old computer parts. Is there a way to use an AIW tuner card to capture mpeg2 vids under linux CLI? Eventually, I'd like to control it via a web interface from any comp in the house. Or is there a good tv tuner card that works well with linux and is controllable via cli?

  46. HDTV playback by dododge · · Score: 1

    I've got a pcHDTV card and have done some transport stream captures in Linux. I've tried playing them back on a friend's Shuttle XPC (running Linux) with an Athlon XP2400+ and GeForceFX 5200. NVidia's drivers do support XvMC (motion compensation) on this card, and Xine is able to take advantage of it. But I'm still not 100% thrilled with the performance. There's some slight judder/jitter, mostly noticable in smooth pans, and that's with everything scaled to 1280 pixels wide. If I try to run the display at 1920 pixels wide, it seems to stress the fill rate or in any case cause it to get much choppier.

    Supposedly GeForce4 MX cards might actually have better XvMC support, but I haven't verified this. For this specific purpose I think the general advice is that the GF4MX cards are better than GF4Ti models.

    Not that Windows HD cards and drivers are apparently much better. I've seen complaints from at least one Windows HTPC user that he's not happy with playback there either.

    So a bunch of us are watching the Roku HD1000 unit very closely. This is a set-top box based around the ATI Xilleon chip -- a MIPS core surrounded by specialized graphics hardware, including full HDTV MPEG decoding.

    Best of all, it runs Linux. An initial SDK (gcc toolchain) is due out in the next week or so. There are Roku folks hanging out in the main Roku thread at avsforum, and have been answering questions and taking suggestions. They also just set up a mailing list of their own for technical discussions.

    As soon as the product was announced there were a bunch of us who immediately thought of using this as a transport stream player, and although the initial firmware does not do that, they have already released two beta versions in the last few weeks developing this as a feature. Apparently their developers also have HD capture cards and have an interest in making this work :-)