Slashdot Mirror


Fake ATM Fraud Expose

santos_douglas writes "Forget ATMs coming under attack by worms, MSNBC has this article about Dateline NBC's investigative report into fake ATMs and other ATM related scams. ATM frauds are a clever combination of social engineering and hardware hacking. The most sophisticated thefts involve the purchase and setup of real ATMs that actually do dispense cash to avoid suspicion, but are altered to save both the card's magnetic signature and the customers PIN, which are later added to false cards and used to empty bank accounts at real ATMS. The 'ATM gang' profiled managed to purchase and setup 50+ machines and steal over $4 million from over 21,000 customers. The machines can be purchased legitimately and hooked into the banking network with no more than a regular bank account. Less sophisticated attacks include building and attaching false fronts to existing ATMs to collect info, and using covert cameras to collect PINs from afar. The articles has some handy tips for avoiding scams."

478 comments

  1. Two tips by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Use banks you trust and use ATMs [or ABMs as they are called in Canada] at banks you know and trust . I'd never use a whitelabel ABM since not only do you get a surcharge but it's very easy for it to be a fake.

    This isn't foolproof but much safer than using random whitelabels you find in Apu's Mealbar.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Two tips by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A scam that recently was in the news here in Ontario is gangs that put false fronts on ATMs. The faux-fronts contain a camera over the keypad and a magnetic reader on the card reader. These were found on bank machines of the big 5 banks (BMO, TD, RBC, Scotia, and CIBC). So the moral of the story is that even if you stick to the "name-brand" bank machines, you still might get scammed. Personally I'm astounded at the intricacy involved in someone putting fake-fronts on big bank bank machines (don't these things have cameras and some sort of security? How did someone pull up and pull that off?), though I guess that's the extent that organized crime can go.

      BTW: Most Canadians I know call them ATMs.

    2. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But tom, what if you really need to buy manham canning supplies, and a "whitelabel" (wtf that means...) ABM (fuck canadians) is all you can find? I bet you'd have your card out faster than you can say "bottles the mangoo!!"

    3. Re:Two tips by FFFish · · Score: 1

      I'm in Canada, and I call them ATMs, as does everyone I know. Probably the use of "ABM" is specific to a small part of Ontario.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:Two tips by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      one of my parents friend works at Scotia... apparently they don't like Automatic *Teller* Machines as the machines don't really do all that they can. Or maybe it's just her...

      Though my brother did work at Securcor [sp?] and they called them ABMs

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Two tips by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Whitelabel means an ATM from a non-bank. E.g. they typically are white and have no label [or some stupid name like JiffyCash etc...].

      As for the rest of your comment... you suck and you have poor grammor.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Two tips by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I meant use ATMs [or ABMs or whatever] at BRANCHES of banks you trust. E.g. the ones indoors. You can still hack those [e.g. inline readers, etc...] but typically they're harder [less likely] to be attacked.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:Two tips by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Count me as annother Canadian who knows noone who refers to them as ABMs.

      Also, most of the chartered banks now charge a surcharge in addition to the interac fee if you don't have a card from that bank.

    8. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spelled grammar wrong, you stupid bitch.

    9. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " small part of Ontario."

      Toronto is a small part of Ontario too, you know, in much the same way that a black hole is small.

      Or so it would seem from our "National" news coverage.

    10. Re:Two tips by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      did I? How could I have done that? Oh my fucking god, no way, you're fucking right... fuck...

      Back to elimentory school for me!

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:Two tips by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      " Use banks you trust and use ATMs [or ABMs as they are called in Canada] at banks you know and trust."

      If it's owned by a bank, it's an ATM.

      If it's a 'white label' machine that's not operated by a bank, then it's an ABM.

    12. Re:Two tips by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      If it's a 'white label' machine that's not operated by a bank, then it's an ABM.
      Anti-Bank-Missile???
    13. Re:Two tips by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      Me: "If it's a 'white label' machine that's not operated by a bank, then it's an ABM."

      You: "Anti-Bank-Missile???"

      Quite the opposite. The White Label ABM business means that big banks make money. Here's How: Canada's biggest bank and one of the top 10 in North America, the RBC Financial group (formerly Royal Bank) co-owns one of the white-label ABM companies!

      So let's say I am a Royal Bank customer. (This was true up until a short time ago.) Royal bank gets my money in their account and pays me less than a dollar in interest per year. And then I go to a white label machine, pay the $1.50 disloyalty fee which goes straight to RBC, pay the ABM fee to the white label company (which RBC co-owns) and then I don't use up the receipt-paper, evelopes, cause wear and tear, etc. on Royal's own machines. It's a good deal for RBC and a bad deal for me.

      The bottom line is that my bank makes more money if I go to the white label machines! Even if I go to another bank's machines, I am paying Royal's disloyalty fee and making them extra money. (I pay no fee if I use Royal's own machines.)

      And a note for Canadians: If you are tired of stupid bank fees and low interest rates on your balances, consider President's Choice Financial. I am a satisfied customer and do not work for them. Sure, it's owned by CIBC but I've never paid a cent in fees, I get free internet banking, free phone banking, free chequebooks, free Interac at CIBC machines, the 'points' rewards are worthwhile and attainable, and the interest rates are decent. (There are some minor downsides like spotty support for ATMs outside Canada, and most depoits over $200 except auto-payroll are delayed for 5 days so they can make interest on it. I can live with it.)

    14. Re:Two tips by fireman+sam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Two other tips:

      1. An ATM is commonly referred to as an ATM machine
      and
      2. A PIN is commonly referred to as a PIN number

      So we have to enter out personal identification number number into the automatic teller machine machine.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    15. Re:Two tips by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Speaking of auto-payroll... is it just me or is everyone in the country paid w/ auto-payroll paid out by ADP? My older brother who works for EA sports, me (i work at panago pizza), My friend alisha (works for a fabric store), my old work ( a call centre), etc.

      Pretty much everyone I know gets a stub by ADP... They must make tons of money, I swear.

    16. Re:Two tips by kisrael · · Score: 1

      So we have to enter out personal identification number number into the automatic teller machine machine.

      So? Redunancy in language isn't a bad thing. For instance, it's why you can still tell what someone's saying even over a crappy cellphone connection, or know what they said even if you weren't paying that much attention.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    17. Re:Two tips by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Speaking of auto-payroll... is it just me or is everyone in the country paid w/ auto-payroll paid out by ADP?"

      I've worked at 3 places with auto-payroll. The first one was a huge company will billions in assets and the pay stub was their own. The second one was a huge company with billions in assets and I had to open an account with them to get paid. (i.e. they were one of the big banks.) The pay stub was obviously their own. The third company was a big financial company, but not huge, and the pay stub was their own.

      I've never seen an ADP auto payroll stub, but then again, I might just be a special case.

    18. Re:Two tips by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      "Can you hear me now? Good. Can you hear me now? Good." doesn't count as redundancy. ;)

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    19. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, ATM's wont give you any money if you point a gun at them. i hate them.

    20. Re:Two tips by SYFer · · Score: 2, Funny

      While the tired old ad is indeed redundant, the signal-checking procedure it portrays is certainly not. Note also that they are careful to have him say "good" after each query--otherwise his repetition and movment would indicate that the Sprint connection truly sucks.

      While the tired old ad is indeed redundant, the signal-checking procedure it portrays is certainly not. Note also that they are careful to have him say "good" after each query--otherwise his repetition and movment would indicate that the Sprint connection truly sucks.

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    21. Re:Two tips by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      I've had three jobs where I get payroll-style checks (not just handwritten business checks), and two of them have been ADP. The third was their own pay stub.

    22. Re:Two tips by kikta · · Score: 1
      ...would indicate that the Sprint connection truly sucks.
      FYI, it's a Verizon ad. And Sprint does suck (in my area).
    23. Re:Two tips by Bombcar · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you like that, then you'll love The La Brea Tar Pits, which when translated is: The The Tar Tar Pits!

    24. Re:Two tips by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Any business that is big enough to offer direct deposit but to small to do it themselves will outsource it. ADP is common if all they want is payroll. My company uses another company to do it for them, so I don't see ADP on mine. But when I was a busser, the check came from ADP.

    25. Re:Two tips by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

      ... and the ATM software probably runs on Windows NT technology.

    26. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thank you [very much] for the clarification [clearing up the facts]. It was indeed helpful [full of information that proved useful].

      Have a good day [or night as the case may be]

    27. Re:Two tips by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that the information you give to authorize one transaction - your card number and PIN - is the same as needed to authorize _any_ transaction.

      You could have a different PIN for small amounts and large amounts, being limited to one 'small' withdrawal per day, and that would slightly reduce the potential for fraud. But people would tend to forget the numbers. You could have a booklet printed with a list of one-use-only identification numbers; then someone would have to steal the booklet rather than just copy one number you typed in.

      But with mobile phones being so common, can't we use those for security? You type into your phone the amount to withdraw and a PIN (which is held only in the phone itself), and it generates an authorization code signed with your private key (again held only in the phone). You type this code into the ATM, it checks the code using your public key and takes it as an authorization to withdraw *one* particular amount at *one* date and time. Rekeying the same authorization code later will not work since it includes the date and time (with say a five minute window between generating the number on your phone and it expiring), and as an additional safeguard the bank records previously-seen codes and won't accept them again.

      Then even if you use a completely bogus ATM that records everything you type in, the worst that could happen is for someone to rush over to a real ATM and type in the same code to get the money - and it would be obvious something was wrong if the fake ATM didn't dispense exactly the same amount.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    28. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go easy on the guy [he thought he was helping us understand him better].

    29. Re:Two tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What should I do when I travel then, Einstein?

    30. Re:Two tips by emilng · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      GNU's Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix

    31. Re:Two tips by EinarH · · Score: 3, Informative
      Here is a picture of a security guy with the fake front in his right hand and the small camera in his left.

      Looks like an integrated part of the ATM unless you are familiar with that ATM.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    32. Re:Two tips by echucker · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein, I went to pull out some cash at the HSBC Arena in Buffalo recently. HSBC's headquarters is literally across the street. Come to find out, the ATMs were a white-label company I've never heard of before, based in Nashville, or someplace like that. After reading your post, I have to wonder if HSBC really owns them, and I got screwed out of an extra $2.50 for pulling out $60.

    33. Re:Two tips by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could do all of that, but it's much easier to just use your ATM card, and type in your pin. With the miniscule percentage of transactions which are fraudulent, the extra hassle of your solution outweighs its worth. We will have smart cards, once the cost of building them comes down, but they're not going to require you to copy authentication codes and other nonsense like that. Hell, a simpler version of your solution has been available for many years, now. But the banks aren't interested in it. The system they have now is more profitable, even with the small cost in fraud.

    34. Re:Two tips by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      My point is that since everyone has a phone anyway, the cost of such a system is very small (per customer). So if it reduces fraud it would be profitable for the banks. Sure, people would prefer to just type in a PIN, but they'd also prefer to have a real branch where a real person can hand out cash. The banks have switched people towards ATMs because it saves money for them.

      The normal problem of ignoring security and doing whatever is most convenient doesn't apply so much when people feel their own money is directly involved. You may find it difficult to explain why running the dancing elephants screensaver is a bad idea, but if people have it explained to them that keying in a PIN means more potential for their money to be stolen (even if this is a simplification of the real issues) they may be happy to switch to a more secure method.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    35. Re:Two tips by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      My point is that since everyone has a phone anyway

      Not everyone has a cell phone.

      the cost of such a system is very small (per customer).

      The cost in terms of time spent is small, but the cost (per customer) of fraud is even smaller.

      So if it reduces fraud it would be profitable for the banks.

      If people won't switch to it, because they either don't have a cell phone or don't feel like messing with their cell phone every time they use the ATM machine, then it will cost more than it's worth, and that's why the banks won't do it.

      Sure, people would prefer to just type in a PIN, but they'd also prefer to have a real branch where a real person can hand out cash.

      The cost to have a real person handing out cash is tremendously more than the cost of ATM fraud.

      The normal problem of ignoring security and doing whatever is most convenient doesn't apply so much when people feel their own money is directly involved.

      Security is not being ignored. We just aren't using the absolute most secure system possible.

      You may find it difficult to explain why running the dancing elephants screensaver is a bad idea, but if people have it explained to them that keying in a PIN means more potential for their money to be stolen (even if this is a simplification of the real issues) they may be happy to switch to a more secure method.

      Credit card companies have tried this, with one-time credit card numbers. For the most part, consumers haven't been fooled. They understand that they're protected against credit card fraud, and the extra hassle of generating a one-time number is rarely worth it.

    36. Re:Two tips by j3110 · · Score: 0

      Bah... there's a much simpler, more secure, and cheaper version still yet... It's called a smart card. That would fix most of these problems... basically, they have to steal the card from you as well as the PIN because it's challenge based. Fake fronts nor fake ATMs would foil this authentication, but don't underestimate a good old fashioned mugging and death threats. At least this would take the automation out of the process. Exactly how many people can you mug in a day?

      Smart cards are generally very cheap too (should be less than 5$ or so in quantity), and anything with a serial port should be able to read them with just a conversion between TTLRS232 voltages (about 2$ in quantity).

      The transition is already being made, but the hold up is getting the machines upgraded/replaced. I'm sure someone can make a dual mode slot replacement to phase them out.

      The best thing you can do right now is go through the hassle of transferring money between accounts (only have an ATM card for one account on you at a time) and transfer money between them. That is unless you want to use a credit card, and just pay it via check every month instead... I don't think you can be held liable for fraud on CCs, or at least you won't if you get the right contract.

      --
      Karma Clown
    37. Re:Two tips by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The transition is already being made, but the hold up is getting the machines upgraded/replaced.

      Not to mention the $5/card. Is it really worth the additional expense? I doubt this type of ATM fraud is costing the industry $5 per ATM card.

      The best thing you can do right now is go through the hassle of transferring money between accounts (only have an ATM card for one account on you at a time) and transfer money between them. That is unless you want to use a credit card, and just pay it via check every month instead... I don't think you can be held liable for fraud on CCs, or at least you won't if you get the right contract.

      You're not liable for fraud on ATM cards either. I transfer money between accounts, but only because my account with the ATM card doesn't let me buy stock. If I could get an ATM card for my Ameritrade account, you better believe I would.

    38. Re:Two tips by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      [or ABMs as they are called in Canada]

      I see the occaisional sign that refers to an ATM as an ABM, but every time I see it I think it's weird, and I don't actually know anybody who calls them ABMs in casual conversation.

  2. I try to avoid them altogether. by Meat+Blaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There's very little about ATMs nowadays to inspire confidence. It used to be that you'd stop by a trusted location to use one (like the bank) but now they're virtually everywhere and aren't always set up by trustworthy entities.

    If they integrated some other forms of identification that couldn't be forged, such as biometrics or retinal scans, perhaps I'd be a bit less worried. But as things stand now credit cards are a better way to go if you're worried about recovering losses from fraud.

    1. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they integrated some other forms of identification that couldn't be forged, such as biometrics or retinal scans, perhaps I'd be a bit less worried.

      What difference will biometrics make if some criminal has installed a modified machine to intercept and record your biometric data?

    2. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by segmond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is even more worrisome, you can change your pin, but good luck trying to change your finger print or retina scan data.

      --
      ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    3. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      It is not as easy to use biometrics as a pin. You could disconnect the camera and plug it into your recording, or (possibly, I'm not sure) put a printed copy in front of the camera. But all this increases the difficulty and the chances of getting caught.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      But as things stand now credit cards are a better way to go if you're worried about recovering losses from fraud.

      That's just not true. Either way you are not responsible for losses from fraud unless you are negligent (or in cahoots with the fraudster). The people who had their pins stolen this way didn't lose a penny out of their own pockets. It's the banks that are taking the hit.

    5. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ozzee · · Score: 1
      What difference will biometrics make if some criminal has installed a modified machine to intercept and record your biometric data?

      To get money out of your account, they would need to be you for one. Secondly, when the crook shows up at an ATM, you can immediatly identify that they are a crook and who the crook is.

      Sounds good to me.

    6. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by quantaman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If they integrated some other forms of identification that couldn't be forged, such as biometrics or retinal scans, perhaps I'd be a bit less worried. But as things stand now credit cards are a better way to go if you're worried about recovering losses from fraud.

      Or a public/private key system. Say when you get your card there is some randomish value on some part of the strip that when it is decryped against the key that the ABM/ATM has they will report a value that the bank gave you when you got your card, say "BLUE" (easy enough to remember). Now when ever you use an ABM/ATM you can know it will be authentic because it will say BLUE, if an ABM says your card is RED then you call the bank to report the erroneous machine which may mean an untrustmorthy machine or the bank has changed the key. The key is changed if some crackers ever find it out then the banks will have to go to all the machines and put in a new key, they'll also have to tell everyone what their new colour is which will be a hassle but hopefully shouldn't happen with any kind of frequency if they choose a good key and have good security procedures.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Imperator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's easy to make a fake card and use a stolen 4-digit PIN, but it's hard to make a fake retina.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    8. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      They would have an harder time accessing "real" ATMs. Some people can (and will) insist that they can fake a biometric scan, but it certainly has to be much harder to fake than using your index finger to push buttons on a keypad.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    9. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wampus · · Score: 3, Funny

      SPECTRE did it in Never Say Never Again! And then they killed the poor bastard with a snake! But good old 007 fucked the murderess and then killed her!

    10. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Splab · · Score: 1

      The problem with this sugestion is that those who put up real atms and modify them are going to come back as trusted until they rip you off..

    11. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could disconnect the camera and plug it into your recording

      You might as well just break into the ATM itself at that point.

      or (possibly, I'm not sure) put a printed copy in front of the camera.

      I'm not sure it's *that* easy, but the current technology does make fake retinas possible. Eventually (and maybe even now with the most expensive technology), this won't be possible, though (short of building a clone, anyway).

      A much cheaper solution that's available today is to have some processing power built into the card itself. When I worked for Hewlett Packard we had to use these to log into the private network from home. A new password is generated every 60 seconds, so an attack like that described in this article would be useless. Of course this particular device isn't the best solution for an ATM, but something based on the same underlying technology would be. Or perhaps better yet, a public key system.

    12. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      How so? Biometric data is sent as electronic pulses in a wire. Just put the pulses down you want.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    13. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To get money out of your account, they would need to be you for one. Secondly, when the crook shows up at an ATM, you can immediatly identify that they are a crook and who the crook is.

      Look idiot, think a little. Using a ATM, they record your biometric data (retinal, fingerprint, whatever) and allow your transaction to go through and record the info. Later, they replay the transaction electronically and rob you.

      How do you think biometrics work? They scan you and convert the information into a long number or identifier. Then they compare that number with the number they have on file. If the two match (or are reasonably close) then the ATM thinks it is you. If you have an ATM (or can connect to the ATM system) you can enter the mag-stripe data, the pin, and the biometric info directly. And as others have pointed out, you can be issued a new card & pin, but biometric info is yours forever.

      The ATM problem is one of the platform. Originally, ATMs were only owned by responsible people who don't (normally) rob you, i.e. banks. But now, any idiot can have one. How can you trust the machine run by someone you don't know?

      If you check your hotmail account at a webcafe, your password is protected from sniffing by SSL, but how do you know the webcafe doesn't have a keylogger running? You don't. You can't trust the platform. Same thing with an ATM.

    14. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      If they integrated some other forms of identification that couldn't be forged, such as biometrics or retinal scans, perhaps I'd be a bit less worried.
      I've always been disturbed by the fact that, with the new feature of most ATM cards which allows them to be used at any credit card terminal, if someone steals my wallet he doesn't even need to know my PIN to get my money. Why not just get rid of the PIN and save me a minute's worth of hassle when I'm at the ATM?
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    15. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone has my PIN, that is easy to reproduce. It will take quite a bit more to reproduce my fingerprint. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it just increaces the level of difficulty.

      When you start seeing biometrics like facial recognition, voice pattern matching, and retnal scanning, then someone having your card would be useless. In fact, at that point, just drop the card. Use your face as the card and your voice as the PIN.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    16. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      That's just not true. Either way you are not responsible for losses from fraud unless you are negligent (or in cahoots with the fraudster). The people who had their pins stolen this way didn't lose a penny out of their own pockets. It's the banks that are taking the hit.

      My understanding is that unless you take legal action, you don't get your money back in a case like this. It's not like the automatic protection you get when you use a credit card. If you can't track down the person that stole your money, how can you take action against them?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    17. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The problem with this sugestion is that those who put up real atms and modify them are going to come back as trusted until they rip you off..

      The bank will supply the key themselves for the ABMs, not the manufacturer. The only way for the criminals to be able to get a real key would be an insider job, corporations already have lots of practice protecting keys, decrypting the key yourself, well it should be easy enough to make a key that can't be decrypted within a few thousand years, or probably the easiest, steal an ABM or atleast the chip that can do the decrypting and use it yourself, The first two shouldn't be big problems, for the final the only thing I can think of is to put the ABMs on some sort of secure encrypted network and have the info decrypted at some central facility, if a machine is believed to be comprimised it's thrown out of the loop. This stops the bad guys from ever getting something that can consistently steal PINS on a large scale. It's possible that every once in a while they may be able to comprimise a specific machine in secret so that it isn't thrown out of the loop and get PINS from there but the moment they start using the numbers the banks should find out and this shouldn't be common enough to ever be a real problem.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    18. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that unless you take legal action, you don't get your money back in a case like this.

      Nope. That's incorrect. You never authorized the withdrawal. The money is being stolen from the bank, not from you.

    19. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Even if your card is stolen, you're only responsible for $50 of loss if you report it within 2 days of noticing. But because this is not a case of a stolen card, you're not responsible for anything.

    20. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by santos_douglas · · Score: 2, Informative
      True, but with one qualifier. The law treats these losses quite differently, with the rules being slightly more lenient for credit cards. See:

      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/atmcard .htm

      It is important to report this as soon as possible, or else your exposure rises. In the case of ATM fraud like this, it is very unlikely the people would report the theft before the cards were used since they had no idea the info was stolen. Plus, from a purely beuracratic standpoint, it is more difficult to convince a retail bank that you are not liable vs a credit card company.

    21. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by GoldMace · · Score: 1

      I'd be more concerned someone would try to steal my eyes, and hold them up to the camera in a plastic bag, like Tom Cruise did in Minority Report. It's bad enough people want to steal my money, but if they ever implement this damn retinal scan thing, there will probably be crooks that are going to steal your eyes when they take your wallet or purse...and then steal your money at the ABM.

    22. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      In the case of ATM fraud like this, it is very unlikely the people would report the theft before the cards were used since they had no idea the info was stolen.

      They have until 60 days after receiving their statement to be protected 100%.

      However, for unauthorized transfers involving only your debit card number (not the loss of the card), you are liable only for transfers that occur after 60 days following the mailing of your bank statement containing the unauthorized use and before you report the loss.
    23. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by kcelery · · Score: 1

      If you lost your PIN/card, replace with a new one. If the thief took a picture of your retina by a fake retina-activated-ATM, you got robbed for life.

    24. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by thynk · · Score: 1

      I've always been disturbed by the fact that, with the new feature of most ATM cards which allows them to be used at any credit card terminal,

      Every time I've used my ATM card at a check out, I've had to put in my PIN. YMMV.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    25. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by sfm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are other ways an ATM can make your life miserable...... read on..

      Once, about two years ago, I was shopping for Valentines Day gifts in a local market. The store had an ATM (and banking center) inside so I thought nothing of using their ATM for cash. As it turned out, one of the $20's that came from the ATM was counterfeit and the store clerk flagged it. Okay, so now it gets weird.....

      I went immediately back to the banking center inside the store and told them what happened thinking I would be able to trade out the bad $20 for a good one. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG !!! Not only did they NOT replace the bill, but they forced me to fill out 3 pages of documentation on what happened, which was sent to the treasury department and was told to expect a call form them in a few weeks. And remember, the counterfeit $20 came from their machine.

      Luckily, I was never contacted by the treasury dept or the FBI, but I am still out $20. Chalk it up to experience ?? I'll say one thing, I will never deal with "Union Bank of California" again.

    26. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ozzee · · Score: 1

      Look idiot, think a little. Using a ATM, they record your biometric data (retinal, fingerprint, whatever) and allow your transaction to go through and record the info. Later, they replay the transaction electronically and rob you.

      We're starting this relationship well with tad name calling and huge misconceptions. You have no idea.

      Buddy, there is far more happening in the biometric space than you can shake a stick at. Do some research.

      How do you think biometrics work? They scan you and convert the information into a long number or identifier. Then they compare that number with the number they have on file. If the two match (or are reasonably close) then the ATM thinks it is you. If you have an ATM (or can connect to the ATM system) you can enter the mag-stripe data, the pin, and the biometric info directly. And as others have pointed out, you can be issued a new card & pin, but biometric info is yours forever.

      Electronically won't work. As soon as your fraudulent ATM is discovered, you and your cash are toast. It's too much work for so little money and so much risk.

      If you check your hotmail account at a webcafe, your password is protected from sniffing by SSL, but how do you know the webcafe doesn't have a keylogger running? You don't. You can't trust the platform. Same thing with an ATM.

      Unfortunately, if the machine at that cafe is compromised by someone leaving a tojan in there, you're toast because all your keystrokes are belong to us.

    27. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ffsnjb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      VISA branded debit cards (maybe MC ones too, I don't have experience with them) in an effort to be friendly and accepted everywhere act as a credit card unless you've specified to use the debit option.

      One track of the card has the CC number linked to the primary account, another has a checking account number, and a third has a savings account number. I forget the order as I haven't had access to a magstripe reader/writer since I left my sysadmin job at college (used for the student IDs). It was nice to clone my debit card when the real one got trashed by a minimum wage counter-jockey who snapped it down the magstripe while swiping the card. BTW, the account info is plaintext on the card, if you know your account numbers, you can clone a card without actually having it available.

      Next time you go to the gas pumps, select the credit option with your debit card. It won't prompt you for your PIN. It will, if you select the debit option.

      I'm guessing its a legacy holdover, it would be nice if PIN usage was required on CC transactions. I think its sad that the local CompUSA here still uses the imprint machines to do CC transactions. Legacy always wins in business...

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    28. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by smallfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You could print a picture of a persons eye on a contact lens like film. Pop it in your eye and presto, instance bio-metric. All you would need is a good shot of their eye.

      Should work, but what do I know.

    29. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your checks start bouncing, you still could be responsible for the fees.

    30. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Chester+K · · Score: 1

      Because it's easy to make a fake card and use a stolen 4-digit PIN, but it's hard to make a fake retina.

      It might be hard to make a fake retina that would fool a human observer. How hard would it be to make a fake "retina" to fool a biometric censor? If I'm not mistaken, they're mostly visual, so you just need something that looks like a retina -- and the machine isn't going to complain if you're holding up your "eye" to the censor as opposed to leaning down to it.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    31. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I learned is that never bother talking to the idiots in the Supermarket "banking center" or even the goddamn "Main Branch" of Wells Fargo.

      The only good advice waiting line to talk to those minimum wage bozos is to "Call Telephone Banking" who are apparently the only people who can actually get something done.

    32. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ericspinder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      These ATM scams work so well because they are able to use legit ATMs to collect the money. You could crack into a live ATM in order to upload your fake data, but while you got it open why not just grab the cash directly. There is the posibility of using some kind of device which interfaces with the machine on a directly physical level. Something that could send a fake stream to the scanner itself, but I haven't seen anything like that yet. However once you start to see boimetric scanners, I'll bet that you'll start seeing upload devices.

      • Great security is keeping 2 steps ahead of the crooks
      • Good security is keeping 1 step ahead, and
      • Average security sometimes a little ahead and sometimes a little behind.
      Most systems only have the budget for average security.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    33. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Angram · · Score: 1

      That would only work if it were an iris scanner, not a retinal scanner.

      --

      GL
    34. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Legally, I doubt it. But the bank might try to force you to pay it, and it's pretty hard to fight a bank.

    35. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Imperator · · Score: 1

      If you own an ATM, getting money out of it isn't an act of criminal brilliance. So if I'm not too smart, that would make you...

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    36. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
      You have ten possible fingerprints, two eyes, and a virtually unlimited collection of phrases for voice identification.

      Add in various combinations (e.g.: left eye + right index finger then left thumb) and things could get pretty complicated and tougher to compleatly capture.

    37. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      A clone would have different fingerprints and retinal patterns (Just like identical twins). Neither of these patterns is coded in the DNA. Rather, they are created randomly by the growth process. For retinal patterns: When some (proto-retinal) cells need more blood, they request that their neighbors turn into blood vessels. In other words, DNA doesn't contain information on where all these blood vessels go. The cells decide for themselves while the body is developing. This results in a more or less unique pattern on the retina.

      Anyways, a printed copy of the pattern won't work, because the scanners look for a pulse in the blood vessels. A video recording, on the other hand, should work perfectly. Perhaps low intensity lasers. One that reflects off the pupil, on the reflects off the retina. If it is a real eye, the distances should differ. Of course, that can be faked as well. The only real way would be a second camera to make sure nobody is holding anything up against it. Have two cameras on either side. In a big black strip / one-way mirror, on a rail so they move about. If they don't know where they are, they can't put a faked image against them.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    38. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was nice to clone my debit card when the real one got trashed by a minimum wage counter-jockey who snapped it down the magstripe while swiping the card.


      Fuck you.


      Since I left my sysadmin job at college


      Ohh, look at me, I went to school, I'm better than people who didn't.


      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion

      Yes, Im sure they feel that way too.

    39. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by mkldev · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It takes less than a dollar worth of materials and a matter of seconds to capture a fingerprint off of... pretty much anything. Voice identification can be captured with a tape recorder just as quickly. With the exception of retina scans, biometrics add a trivial amount of protection, and frankly, I don't want anything resembling a laser anywhere near my eyes.

      What I want to see is something that reads neruoelectric signatures. For the initial version, you'd think about your favorite food while leaning your head against a sensor pad. Of course, that could be captured, but that's just phase 1.

      Phase 2 is to look at am image shown on the screen. When you sign up for an account, they'd do this once and store the neural impulses generated. From then on, they would show you the image and send the neural signature to the bank. The bank would compare the results and authorize the transaction, and would send a new image to display. You would see the second image, and the neural impulses generated by this second image would be sent back to the bank to store for the next time you tried to make a transaction.

      The key requirements are that each transaction could require confirming the neural signature generated by any one or several of the prior images and the images sent for generating new signatures must be taken from a large enough database to get a high degree of variation. Finally, there must be expiration for old images, as one would expect one's reaction to an image to drift over time. Thus, an account unused in 90 days would be frozen until in-person verification could take place.

      In such a case, in the unlikely event that someone were able to steal access to someone's account by taking enough prior neural signatures, they would still have to generate a new neural signature for the new image, which would mean that either it would be completely fictitious (which could probably be detected), a copy of some prior signature (which would definitely be detected and an alarm would sound), or would be the signature generated by the criminal, which could then be used as positive identification once that person gets caught.

      Sound like fun? :-)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    40. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by LocoSpitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Grab the raw data from the scanner and store it. Then when you're clearing out the account, just feed this raw data to the server. If someone is willing to purchase an ATM and mod it to grab PINs, forcing them to mod it to grab data from a retinal scanner instead is not going to stop them from running their scam.

    41. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Biometrics won't change the difficulty of electronic attacks, where the biometric signature is copied as easily as your pin number. Biometrics might make physical attacks more difficult, but still not impossible. Time and time again it is shown that biometric systems do not live up to hype. Sometimes they can be easily fooled, and sometimes the biometric signature can be used to reconstruct an acceptable fake. You can count on someone figuring out how to explit any given system sooner or later. How will you restore your security then? Can you get new fingerprints, or new eyeballs?

    42. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by cstangle · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how accurate this is, but the spoofing of biometrics (namely retinal scanning) was a relatively major plot point in the movie Entrapment
      Check it out

    43. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by McAddress · · Score: 2, Funny
      f I'm not mistaken, they're mostly visual, so you just need something that looks like a retina -- and the machine isn't going to complain if you're holding up your "eye" to the censor as opposed to leaning down to it.

      all you have to do is put your eye against the glass of a copy machine ....

    44. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Kenja · · Score: 1

      I can change ANY retina or fingerprint for only 29.95. May hurt a bit however.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    45. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by chamenos · · Score: 1

      or just have the government restrict the setting up of white-label ATMs. i live in singapore, and i've never seen or used a white-label ATM before.

    46. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a biometric "password" still comes down to 1's and 0's. feed that in after the sensor. the fake ATM's are already pretty advanced so tricking the "sensor checks" (ie if you disconnect the sensor they are supposed to go nuts)

    47. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by vericgar · · Score: 1

      I think this is changing. My last bank statement had text on in the effect of "your debit card will no longer work at Visa credit card labeled locations". I haven't called for clarification but I take it to mean it won't pretend to be a credit card anymore.

      Also about the CompUSA, I noticed the last few times I payed with a credit or debit card in there they did this, but I don't recall them doing it a few years ago (I moved to an area without CompUSA and then just moved back this year). I wonder if they had too many people claim that they didn't authorize that transaction when they really did so they started doing imprints of the card to prove it or some-such. *shrug*

    48. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's quite interesting to play around with a card reader for the first time.

      FWIW, I think there is a little bit of info on a credit card that isn't on the mag stripe, that being the 3 or 4 digit PIN(?). I'm not sure what it's supposed to be called, but it's visible on the backside of my Visa after the credit card number. Some online purchases require those numbers for verification now... so, I guess if you're going to clone your own CC, jot down that number too.

      I doubt CC's will ever have real PIN's. Visa et al. want the whole credit experience to be drop dead easy - if it get's too cumbersome, there would be more pressure to move to alternative payment systems - the little bit of fraud that gets by is just a cost of doing business.

    49. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      They act as a credit card by default because the card companies make more money. Most stores that have looked into it give you the pin option first (wal-mart) because they don't have to pay as much per transaction to the card companies. The card companies have a real racket. They stick it to the consumer, the merchant, and anyone else they can think of.

    50. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by jcp797 · · Score: 1

      If you own an ATM, getting money out of it isn't an act of criminal brilliance. So if I'm not too smart, that would make you...

      from the article: "Randy stocked the machine with cash. And his bank account would be automatically reimbursed every time someone made a withdrawal."

      So the money would be stolen electronically, not physically. Although I assume there must be *some* sort of protection/encryption to prevent someone from directly feeding information into the ATM network?

    51. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by bnet41 · · Score: 1

      I had a employee tell me one time, they imprint because of their insurance company. That wouldn't suprise me since most chains have insurance to cover fraud in large amounts.

    52. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Don't know where you heard that. The daughter of one of my coworkers had her ATM card info stolen last summer and her account emptied of $1,000.

      She still had the original ATM card in her purse, and never gave anyone her PIN number. It was either stolen through an ATM scam (as in this article), or by someone copying her card with a portable reader when she paid using Interac at a store.

      Yet thieves still emptied her account. The bank wouldn't do crap, and she's still out the grand today.

      Credit cards are protected, many banks refuse to protect transactions on ATM cards.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    53. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      What a fsckin maroon you are.

    54. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      This is standard in the US. If you have a counterfeit bill, regardless of where it came from, you have no way to recover that money.

      This is mostly because of the fact that you are likely unable to prove that it really came from that ATM (maybe you brought it in yourself and used the atm for a good show).

      Now, if you had a way that could prove that the ATM dispensed a counterfeit bill, you probably have a criminal case against whoever fills that ATM.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    55. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Does that refer to a "debit card" like.. a visa/mc that debits directly, or to an ATM card, used to withdraw money? Two differnet functions.

    56. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by MxTxL · · Score: 1

      I think some people reading this thread aren't quite understanding that a fingerprint scanner or retinal scanner are not the holy grail in security.

      I suppose it's easy to think that it is. A four digit pin means 9999 possible combinations. There are potentially infinite possible fingerprints and NOBODY has the same one.

      A PIN number's data space can be represented in 14 bits. A fingerprint template can be represented in 1 kilobyte. It sounds a lot more secure. There's 2^3 bits to a byte and 2^10 bytes to a kilobyte so there's 2^13 bits to a kilobyte. 8192 bits! That's 585 times the number of bits! It must be more secure.

      But it's just bits. That's all it is. Zeros and ones. Your four digit pin is a sequence of 14 zeros or ones. You fingerprint is a sequence of 8192 zeros and ones. Your retinal scan will be a longer sequence of zeros and ones. IF I KNOW THE SEQUENCE, how much harder is it for me to send a 8192 of them than 14? It's not, it's the same thing to a computer.

      So you casually stroll up to a fake ATM. Insert your card and type in your pin. The fake machine does everything a standard ATM would do. It encodes the input of the magnetic stripe from your card and encodes your pin number. It does some nifty calculations and dials up the bank network and sends the encoded data... they do a real legitimate transaction and the device dispenses your money. Later, the crook looks at the ATM log he set up to capture your information and can send it again to clean out your account (or if there is a hard daily limit, again and again till someone notices or the account is cleaned). Pretty vulnerable.

      With a fingerprint scanner ATM, you casually stroll up to the fake fingerprint scanning ATM. Insert your card and let it scan your print. The fake machine does everything a standard ATM would do. ... The transaction is recorded and the crook can come back later and do it again.

      There is no added security in using a fingerprint in this context. The only difference? You can't change your fingerprints. It's actually LESS secure.

      The only way fingerprint or retinal scanning can be more secure than password based authentication is if you have actual physical security to ensure that the hardware is not compromised. In an ATM context that is just not possible.

    57. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      I had my debit card # stolen and a couple hundred dollars were paid for an online porn site. All those charges bounced the checking account it was attatched to, and when the letter came in the mail, I called my bank and the company the charges were to. I got both the money and the overdraft fees back.

      Net loss: $0

      Btw, it was Amsouth, your bank may be different.

      --

      -Bucky
    58. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Most stores that have looked into it give you the pin option first (wal-mart) because they don't have to pay as much per transaction to the card companies."

      Are you sure?

      I don't know why they've started defaulting to debit cards recently, but I do know I don't like it. My bank gives me a small percentage rebate on my purchases when I use the card as a credit card and I feel better having to sign my name than using a pin number anybody could use, but I'm really beginning to get irked by all the systems that, after I've explicitly said "credit," kick me over to their pin entry screen. I'm reaching the point where I'm about to start telling the stores to either let me use it as a credit card or I'll walk out without my purchases.

    59. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Her bank is in the wrong. She should sue them.

    60. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I don't know. It probably only applies to a debit card. I still stand by my assertions. If you are not negligent in any way (your card is not stolen, no one finds out your pin, etc) then you are not responsible. The title to the cash never was legally transferred to you in the first place, so the cash was stolen from the bank, not from you.

    61. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people can (and will) insist that they can fake a biometric scan, but it certainly has to be much harder to fake than using your index finger to push buttons on a keypad.

      I guess you didn't hear about the guy who uses Jello to fool biometric sensors.

      http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-916135.html is one article about it.

      "...fingerprint readers can be fooled 80 percent of the time by a fake finger created with gelatin..."

    62. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      Same in Canada. Once you have a fake bill you out of luck. Same deal with stolen goods. A local guy bought a newish car from a reputable dealer. Turned out the car was stolen and the car was returned to its owner. The guy who bought it from the dealer was not able to get any money back.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    63. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      "Randy stocked the machine with cash. And his bank account would be automatically reimbursed every time someone made a withdrawal."

      And I'm sure they just let him empty that account whenever he wanted, without waiting 60 days to make sure no one reported any irregularities.

      So the money would be stolen electronically, not physically.

      Temporarily, perhaps. As soon as the money was reported stolen it would be returned. Electronnically.

      The scam here, and the way the people got away with it, is that they were using the information to make fake cards, and then using those fake cards and stolen pin numbers to steal cash from other ATMs. This way if they were caught they could fly to another country with the cash and we couldn't do anything about it.

    64. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      That's a great plan, if all you want to do is steal money from your own ATM, which you stocked with cash yourself.

    65. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      You can count on someone figuring out how to explit any given system sooner or later. How will you restore your security then? Can you get new fingerprints, or new eyeballs?

      You stop using that method of authentication, of course. Which is easier, reconstructing a human with exactly the same retina, fingerprints, and voice print, or printing counterfeit money?

    66. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      feed that in after the sensor.

      Better yet, just break into the ATM and steal the money.

    67. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 1

      Voiceprints, fingerprints, face recognition have been proven to be insecure. Other forms of biometrics might look more promising, but they might simply be unproven. Do you want to give criminals the incentive and the means to catpure any information about you that cannot be changed? Biometrics that could be used to incrimante (like DNA, or fingerprints) are especially worrysome. Do you think that the police, FBI, courts and everyone else will stop using these biometrics if one such system is compromised?

    68. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Can't you dispute the withdrawal? Whenever I get a bank statement there is a form on the back to dispute any ATM withdrawal. The bank was probably in the right for confiscating your counterfeit $20 and not replacing it. However, they were not right for deducting your account $100 (or whatever) and only giving you $80 (or whatever) and a counterfeit $20. I would think you could handle that the same way as if the machine had given you $80 and no counterfeit $20.

    69. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Voiceprints, fingerprints, face recognition have been proven to be insecure.

      Everything has been proven to be insecure. The secure/insecure dichotomy is meaningless.

      Do you want to give criminals the incentive and the means to catpure any information about you that cannot be changed?

      I don't want to, but I'm willing to. It's not that big of a deal.

      Do you think that the police, FBI, courts and everyone else will stop using these biometrics if one such system is compromised?

      I think once the system is "comprimised" it will be useless in a court of law.

      Knowing someone's biometric information is much different from being able to copy someone's biometric information. I might know your voiceprint, fingerprints, facial structure, height, weight, positions of all birthmarks, etc., but creating an exact replica of you is much harder. I might as well just print counterfeit money, at that point. Or go to your girlfriend and tell her I lost my keys. After all, she wouldn't be able to tell the difference, right?

    70. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      I guess you didn't hear about the guy who uses Jello to fool biometric sensors.
      You mean the he used jello to create a fake retna If you read through another thread off of this comment, I made the statement (as a bullet) that most system have "average" security, which is sometimes a little ahead and sometimes a little behind. It should be pointed out that the "security researcher" whos finding you have indicated (but not linked), was part of the process of security analysis. These holes will always be developed and found, it is up to the manufacturer and the software maker to plug them before they become a wide spread issue. Also, it should be noted that the article you indicated was published on May 16, 2002. Which is a year and a half ago. If that "crack" is still open then the problem is not "all types of biometric security" but the incomptence of the biometric manufacturer. I doubt is that hole still exists, because that article even lists the "patches" which are need for the system:
      Yet Digital Persona's Bjorn stressed that while the study was interesting, several factors limit its importance. The technique can only be used to steal a single person's fingerprint and does not allow broad access, as do some security flaws. Also, most fingerprint sensor hardware allows several other parameters, such as body heat, to be measured, which adds up to higher security.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    71. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 1

      If ATMs recognized people like their significant others do, or if the attacker actually had to masquerade in front of another person, then I'd agree with you. But that is hardly the case with ATMs and similar unattended systems. An exact replica of a person is not required to fool one or two biometric scans.

    72. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If ATMs recognized people like their significant others do, or if the attacker actually had to masquerade in front of another person, then I'd agree with you.

      So your problem isn't with biometrics, you just feel that the current state of biometrics isn't up to the task, yet. I agree with you on that point. Other than the most expensive systems, I wouldn't trust a current biometrics system either. But the part about getting new eyeballs or fingerprints is not a good point. The reading technology will always be a step ahead of the copying technology.

      An exact replica of a person is not required to fool one or two biometric scans.

      Nor did I ever say it was.

    73. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As soon as your fraudulent ATM is discovered, you and your cash are toast. It's too much work for so little money and so much risk.

      RTFA? It obviously still happens, as I believe the point of the article (you know, the one associated with this story) was.

      Thanks.

    74. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking slashdot pseudo-experts. thanks for handling that one, they tend to get out of hand with their "genius" solutions.

    75. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      Thats the CVA (card verification ??). Its a good way to prove you actually have the card, because you hae to have at least seen the card, you can't get it electronically unless you can sniff & decode someone's SSL transfers.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    76. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ah, I love to hear the yelps of undermenschen. Enjoying your worthless job and your unfulfilling life? Perhaps your lifelong dream was to be a store clerk. If so, best of luck.

      We need wage-slaves, like you, so that those who can appreciate the finer things will not have to bother with those repetitive, mundane, and uncreative jobs. Glad you will do that sewage-pumping for us (and cheaply, too!)

      "Ohh, look at me, I went to school, I'm better than people who didn't.

      Why, thank you for putting it so succinctly! It's true, you know. Might want to check into your inferiority complex... oh wait-- its completely justified!

    77. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 1

      My problem is with imperfect biometrics -- and I fear that all systems are imperfect, even if their designers believe or claim otherwise.

      Take fingerprints for example. They are trivial to copy, and they can be recreated from digital scans or photos. There is no practical reason why anyone should want to copy or fake my fingerprints today, so I'm OK if it is used in some limited context like INS or FBI records. The chance that someone else would fake (or match!) my fingerprints are so small that I feel confident I will not be falsely identified. On the other hand, if fingerprint based identification became popular (and in case of ATMs, if it led to cash out of my account), then there would be great incentive for criminals to capture it from a compromised scanner somewhere. The stolen fingerprint would be good on _all_ systems that used fingerpritns for identification, today and in the future, not just the one it was stolen from. I'd have no recouse to get back my previous level of security (or a systems trust in my identity), except to wait until all affected systems were replaced (even legal systems) or sufficiently improved.

      Some of my concerns would be addressed by different biometric systems in combination with more conventional security measures. I even think they would be more secure than current conventional systems... But I think the risks I would be exposed to would be greater, and the potential damage from a compromise would be greater, and I don't think that would be worth the added security.

    78. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      My problem is with imperfect biometrics -- and I fear that all systems are imperfect, even if their designers believe or claim otherwise.

      At least you recognize that everything is imperfect. Like I said, your girlfriend might mistake me for you, and therefore let me have the keys to your apartment.

      Take fingerprints for example. They are trivial to copy, and they can be recreated from digital scans or photos.

      I don't see how they are trivial to copy. I want to copy my fingerprint. How can I do this?

      There is no practical reason why anyone should want to copy or fake my fingerprints today, so I'm OK if it is used in some limited context like INS or FBI records.

      Umm, what if they wanted to commit a crime and frame you for it?

      On the other hand, if fingerprint based identification became popular (and in case of ATMs, if it led to cash out of my account), then there would be great incentive for criminals to capture it from a compromised scanner somewhere. The stolen fingerprint would be good on _all_ systems that used fingerpritns for identification, today and in the future, not just the one it was stolen from.

      No, it would only be good on all systems which do not have greater accuracy than the one used to capture your fingerprint. In other words, it would work today, not in the future.

      I'd have no recouse to get back my previous level of security (or a systems trust in my identity), except to wait until all affected systems were replaced (even legal systems) or sufficiently improved.

      Any system which relied solely on fingerprints is a bad system, clearly. But that doesn't mean that fingerprints don't add security to a system which already has other checks.

      Besides, you've picked pretty much the least secure biometric system out there.

      Some of my concerns would be addressed by different biometric systems in combination with more conventional security measures. I even think they would be more secure than current conventional systems... But I think the risks I would be exposed to would be greater, and the potential damage from a compromise would be greater, and I don't think that would be worth the added security.

      I fail to see the risk. You're saying that a system which uses a biometric identification in addition to the current identification schemes is risky, because that biometric identification might fail. That makes absolutely no sense to me. If it's an additional check, it can only enhance security. Depending on the details of the scheme, it might not provide enough additional security to be worth the price and/or hassle, but that's a completely different story altogether.

      Basically, you're afraid to use your fingerprint for identification, because then people will find out your fingerprint, and then you can't use it for identification. I don't get it.

      As you've said yourself, no security system is perfectly secure. The goal of a security system should be to make defeating the system much more expensive than the value of whatever the system is securing. If all you're doing is buying a soda from a vending machine, fingerprint identification alone might be enough. If you're trying to stop people from stealing many thousands of dollars from an ATM, you're going to have to rely on more layers of security.

    79. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      The store had an ATM (and banking center) inside so I thought nothing of using their ATM for cash. As it turned out, one of the $20's that came from the ATM was counterfeit

      Ah, the crooks are getting better and better at this. First they covered ATMs, then they bought and used whole ATMs, now a whole banking center!

      and the fake $20? Probably some disgruntled crook got tired of giving out real money during the day (and getting money from real ATMs next night), decided to double his profit by giving out fakes in the first place. You see, disgruntled people are a threat to any operation; remember Jurassic Park?

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    80. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 1

      I don't see how they are trivial to copy. I want to copy my fingerprint. How can I do this?

      I posted the link earlier, but here it is again from the cryptogram.

      Umm, what if they wanted to commit a crime and frame you for it?

      It could happen, but I consider it higly unlikely. At the moment those fingerprints would have to be stolen from the gov, or from my immediate sorroundings. In other words, I would probably be a specific target. That is a lot less likely than getting scamed indiscriminately along with thousands or millions of other people.

      No, it would only be good on all systems which do not have greater accuracy than the one used to capture your fingerprint. In other words, it would work today, not in the future.

      Agreed, but nevertheless, you would still have to wait for that newer and improved system before you could restore faith in the given biometric scan. And again, it would only be a metter of time before you'd have to start over again.

      Any system which relied solely on fingerprints is a bad system, clearly. But that doesn't mean that fingerprints don't add security to a system which already has other checks.

      Besides, you've picked pretty much the least secure biometric system out there.


      I did, clearly, for arguments sake. :) Fingerprints and fingerprint scaners have been around long enough to have known weaknesses. Newer biometric systems are not inherently better then fingerprints, just because we are not yet aware of their weaknesses and possible exploits. Only exposure to determined attackers and time will tell.

      I fail to see the risk. You're saying that a system which uses a biometric identification in addition to the current identification schemes is risky, because that biometric identification might fail. That makes absolutely no sense to me. If it's an additional check, it can only enhance security. Depending on the details of the scheme, it might not provide enough additional security to be worth the price and/or hassle, but that's a completely different story altogether.

      I see the added security and the risk as two different things. The added security is that my account is less likely to be hacked, because the bar is higher. That is obviously good. The bad part is that now you have more to protect, and the potential damages of a security breach are higher -- besides a few hundred bucks in a checking account, now you also have to worry about your irreplacable biometric ID and anything else that might be protected by that ID. How much risk I precieve would be directly related to what else might be tied to that biometric ID -- including future use of the compromised service until a newer, improved authentican system can replace the compromised one.

      The way I think about biometric IDs is more like passwords that you cannot change. You think a second password on your online bank account would make it more secure? Sure it could... What if you were forced to use that same password on random websites, vending machines, other email accounts, other online bank accounts, etc? Each of those may be protected by something else unique -- such as a different username and perhaps another pin number -- but have the same unchangable password. Assuming that you can reasonably expect that password to get recorded somewhere, do you think it would still increase your security? I don't. I rather have passwords I can keep independent and that can be changed to limit any damages.

      Basically, you're afraid to use your fingerprint for identification, because then people will find out your fingerprint, and then you can't use it for identification. I don't get it.

      You are forgetting that fingerprints are already used for identification, and in rather serious contexts. It makes perfect sense not to get them mixed up in trivial day to day

    81. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I don't see how they are trivial to copy. I want to copy my fingerprint. How can I do this?

      I posted the link earlier, but here it is again from the cryptogram.

      I don't see a description. All I see is an assertion.

      The bad part is that now you have more to protect, and the potential damages of a security breach are higher --

      This is the part I don't understand. Why do you have to worry about your irreplacable biometric ID, if your biometric ID isn't good for anything in the first place? And as for anything else that might be protected by that ID, you just don't protect lots of things by solely that ID.

      besides a few hundred bucks in a checking account, now you also have to worry about your irreplacable biometric ID and anything else that might be protected by that ID.

      If an ATM used this, and your fingerprints were stolen, there's no way you could be personally held responsible unless you were somehow negligent. This protection is being used by the bank, not by the person, so there isn't "anything else that might be protected by that ID," as far as the victim is concerned.

      The way I think about biometric IDs is more like passwords that you cannot change.

      The way I think about them is like a public/private key system that you cannot change. Biometrics are easy to recognize, but hard to reproduce. That's the key to their security.

      What if you were forced to use that same password on random websites, vending machines, other email accounts, other online bank accounts, etc?

      No one is forcing people to use biometrics on anything. Right now we're not using them on anything at all, so you're not making a good argument.

      You are forgetting that fingerprints are already used for identification, and in rather serious contexts. It makes perfect sense not to get them mixed up in trivial day to day matters that increase my risk for no good reason.

      And you are forgetting that I already stated that fingerprints were a bad example. For fingerprints, fine, they're already being used, and they're easy to copy. So let's not use them for anything else. But that's a strawman argument against a single implementation of biometrics.

      Do you carry your passport, birth certificate, social security card, and similar ids on you? Would you feel comfortable if they were required day to day, if you'd have to submit copies of them to your grocery store knowing they would be sufficient to steal your identity?

      If they were required day to day, they wouldn't be sufficient to "steal my identity." Actually, the whole concept of "stealing someone's identity" is rather ridiculous. For instance, this article talks about stealing people's identity's, but what actually happened is people stole a bunch of cash from an ATM.

      Agreed, but with biometrics the systems are no longer isolated because the key (you) is necessarily shared between them.

      The private key is "me," perhaps. But the public key, which I give out is not me. It's the parts of me that are recorded in those particular conditions at that particular time. And that's not going to be the same among different systems.

      If your vending machine shared the biometric info with another system, then you could no longer think that it was only protecting a can of soda.

      Nonsense. Knowing the information does not allow you to copy the information. I can show you a picture of me, but that doesn't help you very much in trying to recreate me.

    82. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 1

      I don't see a description. All I see is an assertion.

      OK, did a little more google. Here are a couple of real source articles.


      And you are forgetting that I already stated that fingerprints were a bad example. For fingerprints, fine, they're already being used, and they're easy to copy. So let's not use them for anything else. But that's a strawman argument against a single implementation of biometrics.


      Fingerprints do make a convenient strawman, but unfortunately they are still the dominant form of biometric systems. Look around you, count the products or services that propose to rely on biometrics. The majority (60% according to the latest article linked from slashdot) is fingerprint based. The next largest group is facial recognition, which is also not very secure. The rest (hand, iris, voice, writing) may or may not be better, I do not know. Combination systems are very rare today. Don't you think the strawman arguments are valid while the strawman is real? :)


      If an ATM used [fingerprints], and your fingerprints were stolen, there's no way you could be personally held responsible unless you were somehow negligent. This protection is being used by the bank, not by the person, so there isn't "anything else that might be protected by that ID," as far as the victim is concerned.


      So fine, the fingerprint is for the protection of the bank, and I won't be liable if their system turns out to be less then secure. There is also no harm done if the bank is the only one entity in my lifetime (or in the lifetime of a given technology) that uses that biometric. But there are not enough unique biometric systems that each bank, each id card, each company could use an independent measurement, so there will be inevitable overlaps.

      If [birth certificates, passports, etc.] were required day to day, they wouldn't be sufficient to "steal my identity." Actually, the whole concept of "stealing someone's identity" is rather ridiculous. For instance, this article talks about stealing people's identity's, but what actually happened is people stole a bunch of cash from an ATM.

      This is a good argument. As long as the compromised systems are compartmentalized (ie. one bank and their atms) then such a compromise is not a big deal. The problem comes if multiple systems will depend on the same biometric id.


      The way I think about them is like a public/private key system that you cannot change. Biometrics are easy to recognize, but hard to reproduce. That's the key to their security.


      As long as they are difficult to reproduce, I agree. In my opinion though there is a limited window when that is true. Once someone figures out how to do it, then that given biometric will become weaker.

      Keep in mind that the difficulty only exists for physical attacks, where a person is trying to impersonate you in front of a trusted system. Biometric signatures offer no protection against electronic attacks. If these rigged ATMs can copy the PIN number and magnetic card info in a re-usable form, then they can also copy your biometric signature.

      No one is forcing people to use biometrics on anything.

      Oh, good, I'm relieved. :) "use it at your own risk" (whether that risk is lower or higher then alternatives) is fine with me.

      The private key is "me," perhaps. But the public key, which I give out is not me. It's the parts of me that are recorded in those particular conditions at that particular time. And that's not going to be the same among different systems.

      Unlike in public key cryptography, it only matters if someone can produce a good imitation of your public "image

    83. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      This conversation seems to be going nowhere. I'm of the opinion that biometrics can and will play a useful role in security. They're certainly don't solve everything, and the vast majority of applications are going to be required to use them along with other methods of security.

      If you dispute that, I'm not sure we can get any further. Because if you dispute what I've said, you believe that every single biometric system either now in existence or ever to be created is completely useless. I think that's clearly false. In fact, the existence and usefulness of photo IDs proves it.

    84. Re:I try to avoid them altogether. by wolfb · · Score: 1

      You're absolutly right. The photo ID did the trick for me, it put our discussion in a whole new perspective. I feel embarrassed, but I did not think of it before.

      Thanks for the enlightenment!

  3. Yipes! by xeno_gearz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Talk about the ultimate in social engineering! Perhaps the best piece of advice in the article was "Keep a watchful eye on your monthly statement, as well as your balance, and report any problems to your bank." This may seem obvious but with people buying legitimate ATM's and stealing your PIN while legitimately providing your money what much else can you do?

    Perhaps I should just go to the barter system. "I'll give you this cow for that rack mounted server."

    --
    *
    troll blacklist. Please mo
    1. Re:Yipes! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      "I'll give you this cow for that rack mounted server."

      No deal. A decent price for a grown and healthy milk cow is about $350. Now a couple bulls? Maybe we can work something out.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Yipes! by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 3, Funny

      >"I'll give you this cow for that rack mounted server."
      Throw in a pig and your daughter and you have a deal!

    3. Re:Yipes! by a1cypher · · Score: 1

      "I'll give you this cow for that rack mounted server."

      Your not a Canadian farmer are you? he he he..

    4. Re:Yipes! by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      You've never been to the 1st Saturday sale in Dallas, have ya? (I'm sure there are similar things elsewhere, but I live in Dallas, hence I know about this one)

      I saw someone trade a few Cicso routers for a moped there. You might find someone willing to take a cow.

      --
      -twb
    5. Re:Yipes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny but for the fact that the "mad cow" originated in the US, and was the only cow in its herd with the disease (hence it didn't originate there).

    6. Re:Yipes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Throw in a pig and your daughter and you have a deal!

      Do I have a 2-in-1 deal for you?

    7. Re:Yipes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one is the "two in one" the pig or the daughter?

    8. Re:Yipes! by gmby · · Score: 1

      More info? I've heard about that but never been up there.. Where and When(first Sat)- hours?
      Got a bunch of junk to sell...

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    9. Re:Yipes! by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      http://www.firstsaturday.com/

      It starts on the first saturday of every month. Exactly. Midnight. (so, like Friday night). You should come once to buy, just so you know how it works.

      --
      -twb
    10. Re:Yipes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    11. Re:Yipes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whether you are attending a private sex party or a public club, there are some good manners that should be followed. Obviously these rules will vary for different parties, but here are a few good rules to follow so that you don't become an unwanted guest and never get invited back again.
      • Don't be a sling lizard - In other words, don't get into a sling unless you have a play partner. And if slings are limited, give other people a change to use the sling.
      • Lay down paper towels on the floor before playing to collect any spilled lubrication. You may also want to place a paper towel under the bottoms butt. Wipe off the play area and the bottom completely before leaving the play area. It is the tops responsibility to make sure the lube is wiped off the bottoms butt and that the floor and sling or table is wiped off and clean for the next person.
      • Ask your host what the house rules are This includes where you are allowed to play and what supplies you should bring (I always bring my own lube, beverage, paper towels and other party supplies to private parties). At THE SLING you can bring your own lube or we sell it there. Bring your own beer if desired, we provide sodas, paper towels, gloves, condoms and shower. For all parties it's polite to bring your own towel in case you want to shower
      • Don't just walk up to a play session and join in It's best to try to get some eye contact to see if they want you to join in. It can be very distracting to be in a scene and have somebody just join in especially if you don't want them there.
      • Keep unnecessary conversation and noises out of the play area Try not to have regular conversations where people playing can hear you. Also, if you are a screaming or make loud noises during play, this may disturb other guests. Some people enjoy the loud moans and groans but many find it disturbing.
      • If you move any equipment around return it to the original spot when done For example, if you raise or lower the sling, return it to where it was when you got there. Or if you move a table or chair, return it.
      • Do not share lube. This can lead to the transmission of HIV and other diseases. The cans can become contaminated while playing so it's good to write you name on the jar of crisco or lube.
      • Wash off hands and arms and dick when done playing Preferrably with an antibacterial soap.
      • Don't walk around the party in street clothes or be a gawkerAt most play parties the guys are usually in jocks or chaps so that their butts are exposed
      Proper Fisting Technique Photograph
  4. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, the new fad is to fake elctronic voting machines and elect myself to be a president

  5. Aumm, so where am I safe? by Pavan_Gupta · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, basically in the end, anything they do to protect me, and anything I do to protect myself (short of becoming a hermit and leaving society altogether) will still leave me wide open to identity to theft. I guess I could enter a bunch of wrong PINS in the ATM.. but then the ATM would eat up my card. Maybe I could covermyself in a black trashbag and cover the front of the ATM with it, but then the bank will be like: WTF. Hell, the thieves have already installed false fronts on the ATMs, so what choice do I have?

    I guess I could start using paypal. I mean, they're safe? They probably don't have evil workers at paypal enjoying a quick id. theft, I hope? Maybe, I could just start using cash again, but where I live I'll get mugged. Shoot, if I carry cash, I've even got the possiblity of washing my pants with my money in it. That's worse than having my idenitiy stolen. Seriously .. I hate it when my leather wallet starts to rot.

    Screw it. I'll be a hermit.

    1. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      I guess that, as a society, we just have to make sure that it really isn't worth peoples' while to try this on. ATM fraud is unlikely to be that hard to track compared to other more ephemeral crimes, cos you've got a ruddy great device as evidence. The paper trail, if sufficient, should lead straight back to Randy Glass and his ilk.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    2. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by a1cypher · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess I could enter a bunch of wrong PINS in the ATM.. but then the ATM would eat up my card.

      Theres an idea for a scam.. Setup a fake ATM machine that will take your card, and ask you to enter the pin three times. After the client enters the same pin number three times (the legit code of course), then it eats the card. No need to make a duplicate when you can use the origional.

    3. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know what your money says when it looks at your washing machine?

      Heh. Heh. Heh. Bring it, bitch.

      Have you *seen* what money goes through in the name of testing? Lemme put it to you this way. Swallow a dollar bill and a nickel. You'll never see the nickel again.

    4. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wouldn't be too interested in seeing the dollar again either.

    5. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by ffsnjb · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did just that on Court TV's Safety Challenge Holiday Alert last night...

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    6. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you could go inside?

    7. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Incidentally I often use paypal so that I can make credit card purchases because for some reason my bank (a credit union, no less) won't give me a fucking check card because of my bad credit, but paypal would. Few things seem stranger than this. Avoid schools financial credit union at all costs. (Irrelevant if you're not in northern cali.)

      No one has stolen my paypal money yet, but I don't run much of a balance there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay, I feel you. Just do as Roosevelt says, "Speak softly and carry a gun."

    9. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by blowdart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I know you were kidding, but there have been scams in the UK that did exactly that. The BBC reported on it a while back.

      "They began by using "Lebanese loops" - home-made devices which make the customer think the machine has swallowed the card, only for the crooks to nab them after the victim has walked off. But they have moved on to card skimmers - fake devices which are taped onto the doors of cash machine foyers - and card slot readers."

      It used to be you had to press a button to get into the lobby out of hours. Then the homless started sleeping in the lobbys, so the banks replaced the button with a card reader. Now they're having to go back to buttons again.

    10. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ohhh yeah, Paypal is REAL safe

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    11. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by a1cypher · · Score: 1

      Actually, the card reader they use for the door isnt too secure anyway. It doesnt verify the card is in fact a debit card, just checks to see if it has a magnetic strip. You can use a library card to get in if you want.

    12. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've changed a lot since then.

    13. Re:Aumm, so where am I safe? by crzfire · · Score: 1

      go to Washington mutual. I love them, havent fucked me over, ever and i have had them for 4 years

      --
      life sucks, then you die
  6. Old News? by bettlebrox · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    This article is old! I read it 2 days ago and the date on it is Nov 30th. I use to come to slashdot to get links to exciting articles but lately it seems many of the stories I've already read.

    So why is this? Is it because slashdot it getting too many articles submitted (and/or not enough staff)? It would be interesting to read an article from the Editors about how the whole process works (and get suggests from the audience).

    One suggestion I'd have is delete submissions from the previous day and start anew.

    Luck!

    --

    I have a very small mind and must live with it.
    -- E. Dijkstra

    1. Re:Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... it's probably because Slashdot isn't a news source. They are simply linking to other articles (which many don't read anyway). So basically any post you see on slashdot is going to be reported somewhere first.

    2. Re:Old News? by elf-fire · · Score: 1

      Wrong... The article is not old. You have just been spending too much time online, and should have invested more into your social life! (and for the humoristically impaired: This was meant to be a joke!)

    3. Re:Old News? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      does "news for nerds" sound familiar?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. This is hardly new by Kirill+Lokshin · · Score: 5, Informative

    ATM fraud like this has been reported at least since 1988. Ross Anderson presented this at a conference in 1993 Why Cryptosystems Fail mentioning that:

    The fastest growing modus operandi is to use false terminals to collect customer card and PIN data. Attacks of this kind were first reported from the USA in 1988; there, crooks built a vending machine which would accept any card and PIN, and dispense a packet of cigarettes. They put their invention in a shopping mall, and harvested PINs and magnetic strip data by modem... in 1992, criminals set up a market stall in High Wycombe, England, and customers who wished to pay for goods by credit card were asked to swipe the card and enter the PIN at a terminal which was in fact hooked up to a PC.

    This is really more of a problem with the lack of attention to such security issues on the part of banks than a new type of crime.

    1. Re:This is hardly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call it a lack of sufficent punishment.

      At the scale people are interfering with the trust that allows our society to function, really they should be tortured to death, and their kids sold into prostitution. There's no excuse for it, no way to make up for it. It's one of those problems that can only be solved by wholesale slaughter, preferably televised.

    2. Re:This is hardly new by g0at · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      Frank Abagnale wrote about this (and many other fascinating techniques) in his 2002 book The Art of the Steal. Great read.

      -ben

  8. Uhh.. Yeah by dracocat · · Score: 1

    Fake ATM Fraud Expose

    The most sophisticated thefts involve the purchase and setup of real ATMs that actually do dispense cash...

    Ok, tell me again where the Fake ATM is?

    Actually, I have always wondered about these little ATMs that I see in random places. Just walking by the machines makes me nervous!

    1. Re:Uhh.. Yeah by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      Well you could actually setup a fake type ATM with just a pc in a well design fake case could you not. With a fake error message to spoof the fact the ATM doesn't have any cash to dispense whil harvesting cards and pin numbers.

      I am sure criminals have tried this.

    2. Re:Uhh.. Yeah by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

      It is fake in the sense that it was not set up as a legitimate ATM, but you're right, they are real manufactured units. Sorry, IANAJ (I am not a journalist) and not a great headline writer.

  9. Article Highlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Best part in the entire article:

    The U.S. Secret Service says the following people are wanted for questioning in connection with the $4 million ATM heist described in Dateline's story:

    Bella Magary
    Hungarian white male, blond hair, 5'6", with medium build, aka Bill Gates, personal ties to California.


    1. Re:Article Highlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so pirating windows is a bigger deal than i thought!

    2. Re:Article Highlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That pales in comparison to the $87,000,000,000 (87 BILLION) dollars of US Taxpayer money that George Bush is sending to Iraq.

  10. ATMs becoming less useful by doormat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As fraud has increased, I've resorted to using only ATMs at the various branches of the bank I'm with, and I've switched (back) to using credit cards instead of debit cards for point-of-service purchases, so that if I get defrauded, I end up with a huge CC bill (relatively) instead of an empty bank account.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:ATMs becoming less useful by monique · · Score: 1

      This is really important.

      Some company in Hong Kong charged my card for $1700 ... fortunately, I'm anal, so I noticed it the day it showed up online. Three or four days later, they charged the card for 20 grand!

      It was a pain changing to a new credit card, but would have been a major headache to deal with the bounced checks and whatnot that an abused debit card would entail.

      Debit cards just aren't worth it.

      --
      -monique
    2. Re:ATMs becoming less useful by Jetson · · Score: 1
      I've switched (back) to using credit cards instead of debit cards for point-of-service purchases, so that if I get defrauded, I end up with a huge CC bill (relatively) instead of an empty bank account.

      You also get the benefit of their purchase profiling system when you use a CC. I have had a few occasions to talk to the nice people at VISA after my card was used to make an atypical purchase. Most of the time it was me ordering something by phone or online, but once it WAS a fraudulent purchase (someone grabbed my card number in Canada and then tried to use it to buy luggage at a travel agency in Hong Kong). I have never heard of a debit purchase being questioned or refused (as long as there is funds available), which leads me to think the banks place a lot of trust in the PIN.

    3. Re:ATMs becoming less useful by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      So do I, and I have had times where that has saved me money because I could report fraud to the CC company. Once I was being doubled billed for web-hosting and Mastercard took care of the problem when I alerted them of what was going on. I didn't have to pay a cent. In fact I don't care my Debit card anymore accept when I know I am going to the ATM.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  11. Who needs ATMs anymore? by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With every bank trying to screw you for using any ATMs other than theirs, and with the level of acceptance of credit cards nowadays, who needs ATMs anymore?

    It used to be that when I travelled, I carried a fair amount of cash with me. Not anymore - I simply find that I don't need it - gas, food, lodging, all are put on the credit card.

    Furthurmore, should I feel the need for cash, my local grocery store allows me to get cash back from a credit card purchase. I simply make a habit of getting $40 back when I buy groceries, and then keeping about $200 at the house. Thus, I rarely if ever need an ATM under normal conditions.

    It is pretty stupid - I am sure running an ATM costs a bank far less than paying for a teller, but they seem bound and determined to drive us all away from using ATMs.

    1. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Furthurmore, should I feel the need for cash, my local grocery store allows me to get cash back from a credit card purchase.

      Unless you have a discover card (which is evil, BTW), then your grocery store is breaking its merchant agreement. Cash back is only supposed to be accepted for a visa or mastercard purchase if the purchase is treated as a cash advance.

    2. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't think anybody's trying to screw you there, chief. Nobody puts a gun to your head and makes you use their ATM (well, they might...I didn't actually read the article, so I don't know how violent these gangs get :) ).
      • Your bank publishes the charges for using an ATM outside their network, and
      • an ATM you use will tell you the fee for using that ATM
      I don't know why people are so pissed off about ATM fees. What, do you think the ATM fairy just drops them off all over the place for free? The machine costs money. The network costs money. Service costs money. TANSTAAFL. If you don't want to pay the fees, don't use an ATM. Like you said, there are plenty of other methods.
      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      the grocery stores I've been to only let you get cash back if you use an ATM/bank card (which are linked to a bank acct and take the money out immediately).

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not supposed to give you cash back from a credit card purchase. That is, there's supposed to be no way for you to get cash from a credit card without paying the 0-day-grace "cash advance" rate.

    5. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discover card also allows this.

    6. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthurmore, should I feel the need for cash, my local grocery store allows me to get cash back from a credit card purchase.

      Who lets you do that? Since credit cards charge the merchant a fee of 1-3% of the value of each transaction, the merchant isn't keen on cash advances, since they lose money on allowing a cash advance as a regular transaction.

    7. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You need to protest a bit...

      Over hear one or two banks tried to charge for the use of ATMs, and they started shedding customers so fast it probably cost them far more than they could ever have made in fees - they backed down in less than a fortnight IIRC (now the bank that first tried it uses 'we don't charge' as one of its selling points... sigh...)

      Most small shops don't take credit cards... you're telling me you pay for a newspaper with a CC?

    8. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by ottffssent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know why people are so pissed off about ATM fees. What, do you think the ATM fairy just drops them off all over the place for free?

      No, I think the HR fairy drops them off all over the place. She says "Here you go! Tons cheaper than a real person. Enjoy!" and wanders off to do another good deed.

    9. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1
      the ATM fairy

      Either that's one buff fairy or a really brightly painted Chinook.

    10. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by dachshund · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't know why people are so pissed off about ATM fees. What, do you think the ATM fairy just drops them off all over the place for free? The machine costs money. The network costs money.

      ATM machines are certainly not free, but they are a damned sight less expensive than the human-operated branches that banks used to provide for their customers (at no charge). In fact, cost-cutting is one of the reasons banks have consistently offered when replacing branches with ATMs. What any consumer with a brain should notice is that over the past decade or two, banks have continuously reduced their operating costs thanks to ATMs, and yet the amount of money customers tend to shell out for banking services has not decreased-- it has consistently risen. ATM fees are a big part of that.

      The existence of ATM fees is due to the lack of reciprocal agreements among different banks. If bank A has thousands of machines, and wishes to provide better service for its customers, it stands to reason that it would try to enter into an agreement with another large bank B, in order to guarantee that neither banks' customers have to pay fees at ATMs belonging to either bank.

      Unfortunately, experience has indicated that banks don't feel any desire to do this. In the real world, it is far more profitable for large banks to collude against their own customers through inaction-- by not creating reciprocal agreements, and collecting vast amounts of additional money through fees. This pads their bottom lines, and hey, what are customers going to do about it? There are only a few banks large enough to make such collaboration practical, and they don't seem too concerned about how much customers are paying (fees continue to rise, way ahead of inflation, despite the fact that the tech is getting cheaper.)

      A similar situation exists in the world of wireless communications, where international phone companies ruthlessly assess other companies' customers absurd international roaming fees, even when the caller is only a few hundred miles from his home country. The income these corporations derive from fleecing their customers is far greater than what they would make if they chose to collaborate; since only a few companies are large enough to make this sort of agreement, and those companies make too much money off of the current arrangement, customers have nowhere to go.

    11. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      What any consumer with a brain should notice is that over the past decade or two, banks have continuously reduced their operating costs thanks to ATMs, and yet the amount of money customers tend to shell out for banking services has not decreased-- it has consistently risen. ATM fees are a big part of that.

      Until you get a real bank / credit union that doesn't charge any fees. Never once have I given my bank any fees other than interest on loans, which is perfectly acceptable. I don't even pay ATM fees from machines off the network besides the machine owner's charges. And even those are refunded sometimes. Oh yeah, owners dividends yearly are a nice bonus. Banks are supposed to pay you for the chance to earn interest of the collective funds of their clients, not the other way around. Get a real bank that doesn't screw their customers.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    12. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Ryu2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the USA, credit cards have near universal acceptance, but in many countries in Asia, particularly mainland China, most businesses other than the newest Western-style department stores, are still cash only. The situation is changing, but as of now, ATMs are the most secure way to avoid carrying large amounts of cash around.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    13. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      banks are thert efor one reason only...

      to see exactly how hard they can F**K their customers.

      The only person in this world that was more corrupt than a politican is a banker.

    14. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with paying ATM fees to the owner of the ATM. What pisses me off is banks like Bank Of America, that charge YOU a $1.50 if you are a B of A customer and use an ATM that someone else owns. They should be paying you! There's less maintenance on their ATM to access your money! They just do it to make more money. That's why I won't bank at a bank that charges me ATM fees.

    15. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by afroborg · · Score: 1

      you're telling me you pay for a newspaper with a CC?
      Well yeah... there's no transaction fees on my CC - $0.50 per transaction on my debit card...

      Of course, thate here in New Zealand, YMMV...

      --
      my sig could kick your sig's arse...
    16. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Your exactly right. Most banks get charged ~50 cents for a non local transaction. Even balance inquiries. Since most don't pass on the cost of inquiries, and there are as many of those usually as real transactions there you have it with the dollar transaction. Anything above 1.50 is sure income, but they also have to stock that atm with 100,000 dollars in cash that could be making money somewhere else. Some folks in bars etc make cash like crazy though with insane 2.50+ surcharges, and daily cash restocking.

    17. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by groomed · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands, there are no ATM fees. It used to be the case until a couple of years ago that you couldn't use bank A's ATM to withdraw money from an account with bank B, but something made them change it so that you can make one withdrawal at an "alien" bank per day. It seems a much better solution than having Joe and his dog plug ATMs into the bank networks...

    18. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Who can forget the good ol days when one could walk into any bank branch, owned by any bank, and get cash from a real person at midnight or 7 in the morning.

    19. Re:Who needs ATMs anymore? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      I currently do all of my banking through a University Credit Union. Prior to that, I used a Credit Union at the company where I worked. I've found precious little benefit to using either one; though Credit Unions tend not to charge monthly account fees, this doesn't represent the majority of my charges. Most of my charges come from the off-network ATM withdrawals I'm obliged to engage in because the Credit Unions have so few conveniently located machines.

      In fact, because of this problem, I've determined that it may actually be cheaper to pay the $5/month or whatever a commercial bank wants. If you make more than three withdrawals in a month from a non-Credit-Union ATM, you're going to exceed that amount anyway. A larger bank will tend to have enough machines spread all over the country that the fee pays for itself.

  12. Tijuana by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A couple of my troops have ran into these fake ATMs in Tijuana. The fake ATMs have been there at least a couple of years from hearsay. Nasty place.

    1. Re:Tijuana by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you saying that something illegal is going on in Tijuana? No way. I don't buy it.

      -B

  13. Old news... But still rampant! by node159 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here in New Zealand we have major bank monopoly which results in 4 banks owning the market, with very excessive charges. But as a result ATM fraud is virtualy non-existant. But internet banking fraud is at an all time high. Go figure.

    On another note, this is old news and has been around for years but it suprising its still so rampant, I guess the banks must be putting most of the cost on the customers as is indicitave of their inaction.

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
    1. Re:Old news... But still rampant! by Qrlx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in New Zealand we have major bank monopoly which results in 4 banks owning the market, with very excessive charges. But as a result ATM fraud is virtualy non-existant.

      Sounds like the bank monopoly is ripping you off, though. Technically I suppose it's not fraud, but you're still getting scammed, right. It's just a scam that the law smiles upon :)

    2. Re:Old news... But still rampant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but NZ only has about 5 million people. If you want more banks, then thats great, but you'll be paying for it as the overhead each bank incurs would increase.

    3. Re:Old news... But still rampant! by Snad · · Score: 1

      but NZ only has about 5 million people. If you want more banks, then thats great, but you'll be paying for it as the overhead each bank incurs would increase.

      Actually, New Zealand has only this year hit the 4 million population mark.

      As for the "monopoly" mentioned by the other poster - there isn't one. At worst it would be called an oligopoly, or possibly a cartel. In reality it is, as you note, simply the side effect of NZ being such a small pimple on the ass end of the planet.

      For those in NZ who despise the so-called banking monopoly so much there's always the Government owned, low-fee, KiwiBank

    4. Re:Old news... But still rampant! by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its possible not to pay any ATM fees, if you are with a bank that has agreements with other banks to use their ATMs for free. For example, customers of The National Bank have been able to use ASB Bank and TSB Bank ATMs for free for many years now. The customers of the TSB and ASB banks also have free access to National Bank's ATMs.

      The ANZ Bank rectently purchased the National Bank from its British owner, Lloyds TSB, and now ANZ and National Bank customers can access both National/ANZ ATMs for free. This came into effect only a week ago -- December 1st.

      Nowdays the only banks that chages a fee for using any other bank's ATM are Westpac, Bank of New Zealand and some other smaller banks. The ANZ/ASB/National/TSB banks all allow their customers to use at least one other bank's ATMs for free.

      Can anyone tell us what is the case with the KiwiBank and SuperBank (the New World/4 Square/Pack'n'Save bank)? I read somewhere that the SuperBank charges $2.00 for every ATM transaction regardless of which bank you use. Apparenly the banks wouldn't let them use their ATMs for free or even a small charge!

    5. Re:Old news... But still rampant! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Is that a monopoly mandaeted by law (like the utilities in the US) or is it just the marketplace?

    6. Re:Old news... But still rampant! by node159 · · Score: 1

      Just like everything in a small market, you have a few big players and they set the market. Then they can either try and compet with each other = loss money, more customers; or work together = keep existing market share, milk it for all its worth.

      most arnt by law, just the way it happens here.

      --
      GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  14. Yeah by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

    Basically what you have to do is avoid random ATMs and only use ones from banks you're familiar with. This can be hard in some places but in general it doesn't take a whole lot of effort and can potentially save you a lot of trouble later on. If your ATM card gets frauded you're largely fucked because the burden of proof relies mostly on you instead of the bank, unlike credit card fraud where the company has to be able to prove that YOU went on the spending spree and not the guy that stole it.

    You see credit card fraud hyped up in the media all the time, but with almost every credit card you're liable for no more than $50, whereas ATM card fraud is always mentioned as a footnote when it can really screw up peoples' finances!

    1. Re:Yeah by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      You see credit card fraud hyped up in the media all the time, but with almost every credit card you're liable for no more than $50, whereas ATM card fraud is always mentioned as a footnote when it can really screw up peoples' finances!

      It is percisely because you pay for debit card fraud that it is not put on a prominant spot on the news. Wereas because the credit card fraud is payed by some bigass company that it is hyped. Gotta hate Corporate America.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Yeah by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      I got worried when i saw a dodgy news-agent ATM, you stick your card in and then you hear a bloody modem dial out! hm i guess you could record the dial tones and see whats on the line :P

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you stick your card in and then you hear a bloody modem dial out!

      So? Many (most?) modems are configured so that you can hear the dialing and modem sync, so that if something goes wrong, it is easier to diagnose the problem. The sound stops after the modems link up.

      Furthermore, do you know most card terminals in stores use 300 baud modems? They don't have a lot of data to transmit, and a 300 baud modem can will connect over the crappiest phone lines.

    4. Re:Yeah by firewrought · · Score: 1
      It is percisely because you pay for debit card fraud that it is not put on a prominant spot on the news.

      Umm... I don't have any stats on the ratio of CC fraud dollars to Debit fraud dollars. Nor do I have any stats on the ratio of CC fraud newscoverage to Debit fraud newscoverage. So I can't evaluate whether there's really a "conspiracy" here to focus newscoverage in a way that will reduce fraud for corporations. That aside, I suspect that local news stations would find something like ATM fraud very intresting... they make their bread and butter playing bad cop/good cop. That is, they love to trump out scary stories and then try to play the hero role by asking "tough questions", etc. (As a further aside... I think I understand Bill O'Reilly now. He's the up-sized version local news's personality ethic combined with a big-media god complex.)

      But seriously... what I mainly wanted to say in response to your post is this: when a big-ass company gets hit by fraud, the cost mostly gets redistributed to shareholders and customers. So unless you've had your checking account wiped clean by one of these fake ATM's, credit card fraud has had a much bigger impact on the quality of your life. You pay for it, left and right, but the costs are hidden.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  15. Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by calebb · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a cool 10 minute Dateline documentary linked from the original article. They took a former criminal (two convictions on his record) and had him buy an ATM machine... and then he set it up in a public place. Tons of people were using it!

    Out of the 12 ATM vendors, only 1 wanted to do a background check - one vendor even offered to sell it to him without a social security number.

    Then, even more disturbing... he setup a sign next to the ATM that had a card swiper that said FREE! FREE! Card cleaner!! ...and a magnetic card reader on it. LOTS of people were swiping their cards through it, oblivious to the fact that it wasn't cleaning their card, but it could have been snagging their card number. A nearby camera could grab the CVS number off the back of the card. Another camera could get their PIN number.... very good article / documentary.

    note: The video requires an MSN Passport account (free)

    1. Re:Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny
      LOTS of people were swiping their cards through it, oblivious to the fact that it wasn't cleaning their card, but it could have been snagging their card number... note: The video requires an MSN Passport account (free)

      There's something ominous about requiring a swipe of my e-wallet info to view a video of a scam for people's p-wallet info.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> note: The video requires an MSN Passport account (free)

      No thanks. I'd rather surrender my ATM PIN number.

    3. Re:Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you don't have any money, so what does it matter.

    4. Re:Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by Plug · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When they first bought out ATMs, the program behaviour was to give out the cash first. Humans, being task based people, would go to the machines thinking "My goal is to withdraw cash." Then, they would be given the cash, and they'd say "I've achieved my goal", take their cash and leave, totally forgetting to take their card. (Which makes stealing it even easier).

      The HCI researchers picked this one up, and they changed the behaviour to "give receipt, then card, before issuing cash."

    5. Re:Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought they changed it to " swipe your card though a card-reader" so the card never leaves your hand, and you instinctively put it back in your pocket.

    6. Re:Attached documentary - Card Cleaner! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      note: The video requires an MSN Passport account (free)

      When I saw that the first thing I thought was "Does it come with a free MSN Passport account cleaner to?"

      Would it be considered ironic that a video that is (in essence) about identity theft would require you to submit personal information in order to view it?

  16. PINs from far away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What good does it do to shoulder surf PINs anyway? You still need the card.

    I guess having part of the equation gets you a step closer, but the criminal strategy becomes far more complicated once you add the requirement of pilfering a card (close physical contact, a criminal act with each individual).

    1. Re:PINs from far away? by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Lots of people leave their reciepts in and around the machine. Some of them stil print enough info to make a new card. In fact there was a scam where guys would videotape people from across the street. After a while they'd go and clear out the garbage bin, match the time of the transaction with the video of the person entering their PIN and bingo! That's why I always take the reciepts with me.

    2. Re:PINs from far away? by haizi_23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that if they're set up to record the data on the magnetic stripe as well as your PIN, they can just reproduce your card -- there's no need to physically steal it. Reassuring, eh?

  17. I saw a show about this by YoungBonzi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A secret service agent demonstrated how to steal someones ATM card and PIN. She rigged an ATM machine that she bought from a website to not accept the pin entered and to not eject the ATM card. When the user was trying to re-enter his pin, she came over saying "This had happened to last week, I found that if you re-enter your PIN and hold down the enter key for 5 seconds it will work." Of course she watched the 4 digit PIN he entered, and when it didn't work he eventually just left. So she then took out the card with tweezers and now had his ATM card and PIN. The thing is... If she bought this ATM and had rigged it to not accept his PIN, why not just rig it to store his PIN and not eject the card? I mean is the secret service really that stupid to use such a dirty method? Anyway, it was very stupid.

    1. Re:I saw a show about this by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      Stupid yes and no, This is one method that I am sure that they have seen. Most crooks (but not all crooks) would have a hard time cracking an ATM to do what it was never designed to, but getting one to keep a card, must not be hard to figure out. Overall this is the weakest scam that I have heard of however. One would presume that the victum's next call would be to the bank, to replace the now missing card.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    2. Re:I saw a show about this by Negative+Response · · Score: 1
      If she bought this ATM and had rigged it to not accept his PIN, why not just rig it to store his PIN and not eject the card? I mean is the secret service really that stupid to use such a dirty method?


      Valid question, but you have to realize that not all con artists buy their own ATMs. You could go to an existing, clean and legal ATM and tamper with it so that it will jam the next card, then use the mentioned method to get card and PIN. Maybe she bought the ATM in the show simply because it's more trouble to have a bank to agree on breaking one of their ATMS.
    3. Re:I saw a show about this by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Just after the students come back all flushed with their grants (and no idea that once their board and lodgings are taken into account they have about 5.00 a week to spend of food) the most prevalent kind of ATM theft round here is also the simplest:

      Knife in back, 'take out all your money or I'll kill you'.

      A few people get stung with that every year... not a lot that can stop it either (cameras help, but they're not everywhere).

    4. Re:I saw a show about this by xigxag · · Score: 1

      If she bought this ATM and had rigged it to not accept his PIN, why not just rig it to store his PIN and not eject the card?

      Not ejecting the card means, person will immediately call bank, cancel the card, get a new PIN.

      Ejecting the card means, person will be oblivious their PIN and account has been swiped, next day, their bank account can be cleaned out.

      Rule of thumb: The best cons are when the person doesn't suspect they've been conned.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  18. Re:Do we even HAVE editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The 'ATM gang' profiled managed to purchase and setup 50+ machines and steal over $4 million from over 21,000 customers.
    That part is correct grammar. It's saying the 'ATM gang' profiled (in the article) managed to purchase...
  19. No wonder they're everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bank of America advertisement about ATM makes sense now.

  20. Dear /. User by segment · · Score: 3, Funny
    Dear /. User, 2003 has been an exciting year, and 2004 looks to be more promising. In efforts to curtail malicious hackers, and malware, staff at Infiltrated.net, and Politrix.org are prepared to securify your life, and make life easier for your.

    In efforts to do so please email fraud@infiltrated.net and include your full name, social security number, all known credit card numbers, and let us do the rest.

    We promise to give you the experience of a lifetime. At Politrix we don't just secure we test your account against the strictest policies. Using our patented SHAFT -- Securely Handling All Farking Technologies -- Politrix will order $10,000 worth of products. If we suceed we know you arent secure.

    Call 1877TRIXSTA for more details choperators are standing by... A payphone in Times Square

  21. card cleaner! by maddu · · Score: 4, Funny

    A card cleaner was installed next to the machines...hahaha.. How about installing a brain cleaner to clean stupidity?

    1. Re:card cleaner! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Hey I sold 5 DVD rewinders at work last year.

      there is one thing you can count on with people... there are lots and lots of really stupid ones out there.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  22. they missed this brilliant fraud: by tcd004 · · Score: 5, Funny

    WARNING:
    ATM FRAUD

    tcd004

    1. Re:they missed this brilliant fraud: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny. There's a similar true story in the book Catch Me if You Can (yah, the one they made the movie out of): seems the hero bought a locking trunk, cut a slot out of the top and pasted a sign on it saying something like "deposit slot out of order, please place money in the slot in trunk". IIRC, he put trunk & sign below the deposit slot for a mall's rent collections.

      For added realism he rented a cop outfit and stood all day near the trunk.

      Worked like a charm.

      Msg. for any /.ters who still believe in the basic intelligence of your average Joe-Sixpack: read this book.

  23. What an overelaborate scheme... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Funny

    If someone wants to obtain access to easy credit, the easiest way is to simply steal people's wallets, which filthy street urchins have been able to do since the beginnings of civilization. You don't need to spend time and money to construct an ATM, as a few 13-year old delinquients in a crowded area like a shopping mall can obtain credit cards much quicker than that.

    A lot of times, bank cards can be used as credit cards, and only require a signature that is seldom ever checked against the one on the back of the card inside the US, though in the EU they actually do it. The PIN number is hardly ever needed, but all that is required to access it is a quick phone call to a bank. Just walk into Best Buy and go on a shopping spree and hit credit on the little number pad, and all they'll ever do is make you sign a receipt.

    1. Re:What an overelaborate scheme... by Q2Serpent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But, when you lose your wallet, you are likely to report the card as missing/stolen a lot quicker. With magnetic stripe theft, most people won't notice money missing until their next statement.

    2. Re:What an overelaborate scheme... by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Those self-swipe card readers are double-edged swords. It's very convenient to swipe my card while the cashier is doing something else like scanning my groceries. On the other hand, when I hand my credit card to a good cashier he or she will hold it until I've signed the receipt, and then check the signature on the card to the one I just made. If I swipe the card myself, it's usually back in my wallet before the receipt has even printed. This makes signature checking almost useless.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    3. Re:What an overelaborate scheme... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      That's why I write "ASK FOR ID!" on the first part of the signature strip and sign my card on the other half. I thank folks that ask me and I chide those that do not with comments like, "With clerks like you verifying signatures, I can't believe someone would try to use a stolen credit card." Some don't even get my sarcasm, some then double-check the card and/or ask for ID right away. The point is that at least they're being called on not checking the signature - which would then force them to ask for ID as I've written on all my cards.

      Of course, gas stations and the newer credit card readers that allow the customer swipe the card themself and the clerk never see it (or the self-shop checkout at Home Depot or WalMart) bug me a bit.

      But at least with credit cards you're much more protected. I've never heard what the situation is with an ATM card... I'm sure it varies bank by bank, but you might just be SOL if someone clears out your account and they aren't caught.

      Further, I think CC companies should be required to put a photo on cards. Yeah, it'd be a hassle as you'd have to go in and get a photo taken, but I'd feel much better. I'd even like to have two sets of cards, one that can be used over the phone or with automated things without photo, and the photo one which could only be used at places with a live human checking.

      *shrug* I really like MBNA's Shopsafe feature that allows you to generate a new card number for each online purchase, set an expiration date, and a limit amount. My Wife and I each have one of these cards and use the Shopsafe feature for all our online purchases. Best of all, you can get a Linuxfund pengiun logo'd one that supports Open Source.

    4. Re:What an overelaborate scheme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot.

    5. Re:What an overelaborate scheme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But with CC's you're protected by federal law. If a shop clerk accepts a CC and does NOT ask for ID, and the card was stolen, you're only liable for up to $50 dollars.

      So basically, the shopkeepers are out of luck if your card is stolen. Next time they should check for ID.

  24. Minor safeguard... by Magus311X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seperate accounts.

    I've done this for a while. I have an account in which I pull out money I'll use to write checks for bills, Paypal, and to pull money from the ATM. This account usually only has another $1000-1500 in it that what is necessary for the bills.

    I have another account in which the money is meant to sit there unless there's an emergency. I can write checks with this account, but I never do (so if there's a check written from it on my statement, I'd call the bank ASAP). My ATM isn't tied to this account. Paypal will never it ever exists. And half of the money is always purposely tied up in fairly short-term CDs.

    -----

    1. Re:Minor safeguard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, you mean account 8215302611041234?

    2. Re:Minor safeguard... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      That's a good idea, and it would be better if the two accounts were in separate banks--I believe that a bank might use one account to cover shortages in the other; or if there was a dispute about charges in one account they would use the second to cover.

      However, I'm too lazy to do such a thing, so for my online shopping + paypal I use a temporary credit card number. It allows me to set a credit card # with a specified amount and expiration date, online, using a secure flash window(?). So I know that I won't be out an amount larger than I've authorized; nice for PayPal transactions, or for shady eBay transactions.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:Minor safeguard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't necessarily need two different bank accounts. Just know how the subaccounts are handled at your bank. For example, at my credit union, only the savings subaccount of a particular type (the default "regular share") will be used for overdraft protection on most checking type subaccounts. Money market, CD, summer pay, IRA, etc type subaccounts are held seperate from saving and checking subaccounts and will not be drawn from in an overdraft situation. I believe you can also set up a "regular" savings subaccount that will not be used as overdraft on the checking subaccount. You just have to know how the system works.

  25. Thanks for the tips, but by fruity1983 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The articles has some handy tips for avoiding scams."

    That's nice, but what we really need are tips on how to set these scams up.

    I'm unemployed.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    1. Re:Thanks for the tips, but by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      Not difficult to find that sort of info online and, frankly, the most important thing is having the nerve to try it. This is always the case with social engineering.

      And that's what I'd class this issue as. The system itself is secure (apart from all the idiot/corrupt salesfolk). The only problem is that users have been convinced that the identity thief is a real ATM owner.

      Seriously, they could stick a sign saying "atm" on the outside of a letterbox and people would use it :)

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    2. Re:Thanks for the tips, but by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Hopefully Chip&Pin will take care of most of it... the banks are pushing it so hard that it's bound to take off (almost every shop I see with credit card machines also has a C&P logo stuck to their window... even though nobody has any of the actual cards yet - I suspect the retailers are being paid or more likely strongarmed into adopting it - they're talking about 100% of all CC/debit transactions going via C&P by the end of next year).

      Even if you're stupid you need the physical card to actually do a transaction with it, as they're damn near uncopyable. The downside is once someone has your pin it's game over - they can *prove* that they are you to any store with no need to bother with learning your signature.

    3. Re:Thanks for the tips, but by quantaman · · Score: 1

      That's nice, but what we really need are tips on how to set these scams up.

      It's actually not that difficult. In my experience Social Engineering turns out to be the most effective approach. It has a significantly higher return than other methods and requires much less effort. The only real downside is they can have a slightly higher risk threshold due to the personal contact involved but this can be negated in many ways, among them completing transactions online where it is easier to protect your identity. If fact I believe I can give you a simple demonstration on how it works, all you need to do is give me your name, SIN, PIN, and credit card number and I can give you first hand experience in how social engineering scams work!

      --
      I stole this Sig
  26. A solution... for the semi-paranoid by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can, with ease, open up a second with your bank... where by the 2nd account is used exclusivly for online transations and getting the odd bit of cash.

    1 primary card for your paycheck needs, used only at trusted locations, like your physical bank, card stored at home preferably in a safe.

    1 secondary card which can be termed a petty cash card, where you may transfer funds to it on an as needed basis, for mail order items for example.

    I'm not saying that this system is perfect, but offers some minimal protection, and can be implemented by going down to your bank and opening up a second account. If lost or stolen, well you loose you may loose your petty cash, but hey could be worse, far far worse.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:A solution... for the semi-paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except my primary account *is* damned petty.
      Stoopid unemployment.

  27. Looks like the problem... by FFFish · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is mere greed. I mean, shit, $4 million in theft? Come on, guys, get a clue! A mere half-million would have been enough to purchase a really nice house and car, go on a great vacation, and give a big chunk to charity. A million would have you nicely comfortable for life.

    Four million, though? Damn, you deserve to get caught.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Looks like the problem... by Zenki · · Score: 1

      Actually i think these days it's 10 million to live decently on the interest. 1 million can be blown off these days pretty quickly.

      Assuming you can get a 1% return (aka bank savings account) on 10 million, you can get $100,000 a year in interest which is a pretty decent income with little to no effort.

    2. Re:Looks like the problem... by operagost · · Score: 1

      and give a big chunk to charity

      Doesn't seem likely that these guys are the generous types.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Looks like the problem... by krumms · · Score: 1

      mere greed. I mean, shit, $4 million in theft?

      You've obviously never heard of big business.

    4. Re:Looks like the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake up, this isnt the 40s.. when I saw 4 million in theft I was in shock... at how low it was.. All this work, 50+ fake atms, the risk and results of getting caught.. all for just 4 million? Doesnt seem worth it, i'd blow 4 million in a couple days easy

    5. Re:Looks like the problem... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      No one investing $10 million, or even $1 million, is doing so using a cash savings account.

      You can get triple-A bonds paying 5-8%. They're a no-brainer, and would pay you enough to live quite nicely on a million dollar, especially if you're smart enough to move the hell out of whatever high-taxation country you live in, and out to some nice small caribbean island.

      Give your million bucks to a money manager and I'm quite sure you can get a good 10-15% per year.

      Sure, you're not going to live an ostentatious lifestyle... but you'll live a pretty nicely. Especially in Jamaica or Costa Rica.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    6. Re:Looks like the problem... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I hate to tell you this, but you live in a very cheap area.

      $500K will barely get you a nice house anywhere in the NY metro area. In fact, the only 4 bedroom houses that cost that much are going to be either very far away, or in the ghetto. A nice, rundown townhouse in Crown Heights will go for about $500K.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    7. Re:Looks like the problem... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Oh, come off it!

      You can buy an entire Caribbean island and build a nice house on it for under a quarter-million.

      Why on earth would you wish to steal a million bucks and then hang out in an expensive, polluted, crowded city?

      Move to Colorado and live on 35 acres in a beautiful log home for $330k.

      Move to Costa Rica for under $200K.

      Move to Perth! Nice place, under $350k.

      I suppose, though, that thieves aren't all that good at being smart and fiscally sensible. A modest amount at moderate risk for a moderate lifestyle? Hell, no!

      I'd probably make a lousy thief.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:Looks like the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you dont live in california do you...

    9. Re:Looks like the problem... by JDBrechtel · · Score: 1

      No, it's that the NY Metro area is a very expensive area. Do you HAVE to live there to have a nice life? Not really. For the vast majority of the USA his statement is correct.

    10. Re:Looks like the problem... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      I hate to tell *you* this, but no one in their right mind would want to live in the NY metro area.

      I suppose criminals, by definition, aren't really in their right mind, though, so maybe there's a point.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    11. Re:Looks like the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perth!

      You are kidding right?

      Its a hole.

    12. Re:Looks like the problem... by Talez · · Score: 1

      Margaret River isn't Perth. It's like 250 miles from Perth.

      It's like saying Los Angeles is the same as Sanfransisco.

    13. Re:Looks like the problem... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The high prices of property in the NY metro area seems to dispute your claim.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    14. Re:Looks like the problem... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the 35 million people in that live in the New York tri-state area are all criminals, and insane.

      Some of us have family, friends, a career that doesn't easily move elsewhere, all in this area. What are we supposed to do? Give up a reasonably good job, pay hundreds of dollars to fly to visit family, and make new friends in the rural countryside?

      I think THAT sounds crazy.

      If I really was going to move far away to save money, I would move to Argentina. No immigrant invasion, beautiful women, inexpensive homes... You can get a townhouse in Buenos Aires for $200K US easily.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  28. in Canada... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    I went up to Montreal two years ago to visit a friend, I used a 'white label' ATM at a chinese food joint and took out $20 CAN from my US account, the transaction ended up costing me upwards of $40 US, which is like $60 CAN!

    And this was all legal, no recourse was possible. I wonder who made off with the 'big money' though, my bank, the ATM company, or the chinese food joint.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:in Canada... by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did it tell you before withdrawing the money that it was going to do that? If not, it's fraud!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:in Canada... by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A recent trend here in Canada is that if you use one of the bank machines of a bank other than the bank that issued your debit card, they tack on a $1.50 service charge (this is atop the Interac fee that your own bank charges you). Given that most people get our fairly small sums, like $40 - $60, this is an outrageous service charge and it's just another money grab by the big banks. In any case, and getting back to your point, if they do this they have to provide a notice that there will be a service fee, to which you have to agree.

      My guess is that your own bank dinged you with a huge "cross-border" service charge for the electronic debit. This is surprizing, though, as I've used my Canadian bank card around the globe and have never gotten charged anything more than the Interac fee and the normal currency conversion.

      (PS. $40 was $60 Canadian about two years ago, but today it's about $52 Canadian).

    3. Re:in Canada... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      "And this was all legal, no recourse was possible. I wonder who made off with the 'big money' though, my bank, the ATM company, or the chinese food joint."

      The 'white label' ones (called ABMs) are operated privately and whatever restaurant or convenience store owns them can charge whatever service fees they want. I live in Canada and I never ever use the white label machines. The cost is insane. You were hit with the 'disloyalty fee' from your bank for not using their machine (not that there was one,) a PLUS/Cirrus fee for international transactions, a currency change fee from your bank, whatever normal fee is levied by the ABM's owner, and maybe a currency exhange fee levied by the ABM's owner.

      If you had gone to a machine that was actually run by a bank (an ATM) then the service charges would have been much lower. Banks generally have lower surcharges than white label machines.

    4. Re:in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      spring of 02 I was in europe, I used my regular american bank card in several ATM's in europe.. at least Amsterdam, Berlin, Paris... out spat my Euros and i wasn't charged nearly what my father was getting charge, by using travellers checks at money-exchange places

    5. Re:in Canada... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thinking about this got me riled up enough to pull out my banking records, it looks like my bank (Fleet) made quite a bit, by charging a huge 'exchange fee' and whoever sat at the Canadian-end of the deal took about $10 CAN as a "service charge".

      It cost me $40 US, but my bank charged everything after $30 CAN.

      I'm so pissed at Fleet, I've watched them switch around my transactions so they can charge overdraft fees. I sat and WATCHED online as my paycheck clearing time changed to AFTER the bills were paid so they could nail me with $75 in fees. I called them right after and told them that if I didn't get my $75 back I'd get a lawyer involved, they gave it right back. If my identity weren't stolen (long story) I'd open an account with Citizens Bank right now, I used to work there so I'd know who to call and yell at.

      Whew. Don't drink, bank, and slashdot!

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    6. Re:in Canada... by Mnemia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Weird. I used my US debit card quite extensively in Japan this spring and I never got charged all those fees you are talking about. Granted, I was mostly using government-run ATM machines while there that I believe do not charge fees even if you are not a customer. But my bank sure didn't charge me any "disloyalty" or any of those currency exchange fees you are talking about. I was getting a pretty competitive exchange rate too (I was monitoring the amount actually debited from my account using Internet banking).

    7. Re:in Canada... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Weird. I used my US debit card quite extensively in Japan this spring and I never got charged all those fees you are talking about. Granted, I was mostly using government-run ATM machines while there that I believe do not charge fees even if you are not a customer. But my bank sure didn't charge me any "disloyalty" or any of those currency exchange fees you are talking about. I was getting a pretty competitive exchange rate too (I was monitoring the amount actually debited from my account using Internet banking)."

      It depends on the service agreement you have with your home back. You might have an agreement where there is no disloyalty fee. As to what the ATMs will charge you in Japan ... I have no idea.

    8. Re:in Canada... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Use an ATM in Vegas sometime. The ones inside the casinos charge a percentage on money withdrawn, rather than a flat rate. So on $100, they'll charge you 4% (or whatever), on $200 8% and so on.

      Step outside the casino and ATMs are the regular ones that charge a couple bucks for a "foreign" transfer.

      Still, it's a scam. I take out a big chunk of money ($100 at a time) to minimize their money gouging.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:in Canada... by HBI · · Score: 1

      I'm glad it's not only me that think Fleet Bank sucks ass.

      They fuck me over every goddamn pay period with shit like that.

      They weren't making enough off fees so I suppose they had to do some creative stuff to create income.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    10. Re:in Canada... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I sat and WATCHED online as my paycheck clearing time changed to AFTER the bills were paid so they could nail me with $75 in fees.

      wow. I thought they just wrote their orderby clauses to make this happen. I'm starting to hate banks, and the credit card business' are the worst. US Bank routinely assesses arbitrary hold times on my deposits so that my overdraft "line of credit" gets hit. I went round and round with one of their people one day trying to figure out how and when the overdraft protection gets used. She was very evasive. I finally cornered her and got the truth though. I think the entire thing is a scam.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    11. Re:in Canada... by dirty · · Score: 1

      This is why credit unions are much better than banks. When my account gets over-drawn they send me a letter saying basically, "your account is negative, fix it now," but written more politely. They don't even charge me the $.37 to mail the letter. ATM deposits are available imediately, regardless of whether I have enought money in my account to cover the deposit. The only ATM fee they charge me is $0.25 for any withdrawl under $20. They also refund up to $4 a month in ATM fees charged by other banks.

      It's really nice having a bank that exists to make as much money as possible for the members, rather than the corporation that owns it.

      --

      -matt
    12. Re:in Canada... by grimarr · · Score: 1

      I wish the Virginia Credit Union was like that. They held a big deposit of mine a couple of weeks ago, without prior notice. The letter I got said that it was because I had too many bounced checks. The only reason I had ANY bounced checks was because of previous deposits being held without warning.

      Mostly, I like banking there. But their inability to explain in advance when deposits will be held makes me consider alternatives.

      What's your credit union?

    13. Re:in Canada... by dirty · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania State Employee's Credit Union. Best thing since sliced bread.

      --

      -matt
  29. Re:help needed! by psykocrime · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was thinking of buying a nice pistol for protecting myself and my 2nd amendment rights. Currently, I'm leaning towards a taurus .38 or .357 (double action), though a taurus .44 or .45 pistol is also a possibility. I'm also looking at a berreta 1911 pistol.

    Anyone have any thoughts on what they'd go with?


    Conventional logic is that a 1911 is too heavy for regular carry, and too big to properly conceal, if you're going the "conceal carry" route.

    A .357 or .44 is probably overkill for street self-defense. The stopping power is nice, but the recoil is a little on the high side, and when you figure in the adrenaline involved in a self-defense situation + muzzle recoil, you're probably not going to be real accurate with one of those things, unless you practice A LOT.

    I wouldn't go 9mm though, too many times I've read about thugs getting shot repeatedly with 9mm and still continuing to attack. See the famous Miami / FBI shootout stuff for more... long story short, the FBI used to carry 9mm's until some crazy doped up fucker killed 2 or 3 FBI agents after getting capped several times with a 9mm.

    So what would I go with? A nice automatic in .40 S&W, or maybe a .357 Mag auto, but loaded with .38 Special rounds (yes, you can safely load a .357 Mag with .38 Special rounds). Either one should be available in a size and weight that's comfortable to carry and small enough to conceal.

    Other than that, I'd go with a 1911 in .45 ACP, despite the "conventional logic" stuff.

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  30. OK, but please don't regulate by argoff · · Score: 1

    Every time somthing like this happens, there is a cry to regulate by the masses, and then the Bank officials promplty fund the campaigns of the political powers that be to make sure that they are nice regulations.

    I would not be supprised at all if this were intentional fear mongering designed to get particular policitians elected. What we really need is an attitude of - buyer beware and to let the market teach them a lession if they become too lax about financial security.

    1. Re:OK, but please don't regulate by haizi_23 · · Score: 1

      ah yes. the last thing anyone needs in a field like banking is regulations. laws about banking would suck, eh?

      actually, i think it's intentional money-stealing to get particular organized criminals' wallets fatter. if there's a conspiracy to be sniffed out here, that would be it.

    2. Re:OK, but please don't regulate by argoff · · Score: 1


      The funny thing is that there were no institutions or specific places of business named in that article. You would think that mentioning them would be in the publics best interest.

      Another funny thing is that there are a lot of banks outside the US that are less regulated and have proven themselves over the long term to be just as safe and provide a higher return on investment, and better service.

      Banks here are never made to be responsible for their actions "as long as the're just following regulations"

  31. ATM Vs. INTERAC by Malicious · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Personally, I fear no ATM. If I need cash, I simply go to the bank and get it from the official ATM there. That way I save my self $1.50 or what ever the FlybyNight ATM charges. I do this once, perhaps twice a month

    The problem arises when people have created false Interac machines, or scam your bank cards information from it. I use Interac probably 3-4 times a day, and each time, do my best to ensue I can see the interac terminal, which my card is being scanned through, to allow my self a *little* piece of mind.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:ATM Vs. INTERAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Interac probably 3-4 times a day, and each time

      Why? Use a credit card. Many credit cards will give you points, extended warranties, and your maximum loss in the event of fraud is $50.

    2. Re:ATM Vs. INTERAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many places that take Interac allow you to get cash back. Instead of using an ATM, I just ask for x*$20 cash back when I buy groceries, and then pay with cash everywhere else.

  32. THERES MY TUTITION! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I knew that there would be a way to pay my tution....

    1. Re:THERES MY TUTITION! by blindbat · · Score: 1

      based on your spelling you need all you can get

  33. TANSTAAFL by twoslice · · Score: 3, Informative

    TANSTAAFL /tan'stah-fl/ [acronym, from Robert Heinlein's classic "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress".] "There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch",

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      Yeah, that's what I said. You can't expect an ATM to dispense cash for nothing. T

  34. Can't trust anyone by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    These days, we can't trust anyone. I will set up my own ATM machine, and use only that one. I will also allow any Slashdot user on my "friends" list to use it. Or any stranger.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  35. Re:help needed! by psykocrime · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here's some more info on the history of the Miami Shootout and the emergence of the .40 S&W...

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  36. phishing expeditions by hedley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ATM's have long been such a target. Whne my bank back in NYC (Citibank) installed the old drum ATM's (try the code 1 1 2 3 5 :)), these rooms were vulnerable to people coming in right after you were done and hadn't signed out. Also the drum was weak, it would lose money around it's circumference and wasted your time for the end of day count to get your money back.

    Of course the usual robberies occured in the rooms themselves, forcing individuals to "dip" and enter their pins. Or getting pin jacked.

    Face it, we need these machines until the fabled cashless society kicks in. In the meanwhile, use your banks ATM (also avoids service charges). Avoid all other ATMs.

    Thinking about it, in the context of those "virtual credit card numbers", imagine a special PIN that is good for one transaction. If you are uncertain of a particular ATM or get pin jacked, give over the one time PIN#. Later, visit their website to activate/deactivate that magic pin.

    Hedley

    1. Re:phishing expeditions by Chester+K · · Score: 1

      Thinking about it, in the context of those "virtual credit card numbers", imagine a special PIN that is good for one transaction. If you are uncertain of a particular ATM or get pin jacked, give over the one time PIN#. Later, visit their website to activate/deactivate that magic pin.

      Now that's a good idea. Even take it further and don't require the user to visit the website to deactivate the PIN, have it automatically deactivate after one use.

      --

      NO CARRIER
  37. Know what you mean by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    Carrying cash gets to be a risk, and a hassle... it also makes it harder to track your spending habits.

    Yes, everything you buy on a credit card could go into some giant big-brother database... but you also get a nicely printed statement at the end of the month. I find this makes it infinitely easier to see where your money goes. Some programs, like Quicken (Evil Intuit... Evil!) will even automatically put that data into a ledger for you.

    Honestly, credit cards make it easy, and there's fraud protection if it gets snatched (prompt reporting helps). On the other hand, if someone gets your Visa Check/Debit card (connected to your checking account), they can empty your bank account lickety-split... and you can be out the whole amount, not just the first $50.

    Yep... I find myself using the ATM less and less.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  38. Not fraud, just related amusment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, 'cuz there's just no way i could use *nix to build a fake atm.
    Retard.

  40. Non-biometrics solution by product+byproduct · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would prefer to use an electronic key that when interfaced with an ATM will happily raise any given number to my secret exponent modulo my public key.

    For each transaction, my bank will send a random challenge to the ATM that only my electronic key can solve.

    1. Re:Non-biometrics solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah... A smartcard. I just ddi a project on it.

    2. Re:Non-biometrics solution by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I would prefer to use an electronic key that when interfaced with an ATM will happily raise any given number to my secret exponent modulo my public key.

      Umm, you better make that any given number signed by a bank who presents a certificate signed by your bank (or mastercard or visa or whatever).

      Otherwise, you're vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.

    3. Re:Non-biometrics solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, no.

      A man-in-the-middle attack allows someone to eavesdrop on the conversation, or possibly modify the message.

      eavesdrop? Who cares, the bank challenge will be different on the next transaction.

      modify? Then the bank won't accept the current transaction.

    4. Re:Non-biometrics solution by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      modify? Then the bank won't accept the current transaction.

      Why not?

    5. Re:Non-biometrics solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bank is waiting for f(x). Only the key can compute f, so the only way the bank is going to receive f(x) is if x was sent to the key without modification and f(x) was returned to the bank without modification.

      What's so hard about this? It is only a one-way challenge, so it requires encryption only on one side. x and f(x) can be in the clear and unsigned.

      Now, you better come up with something really smart, or stop commenting on crypto stuff.

    6. Re:Non-biometrics solution by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The bank is waiting for f(x). Only the key can compute f, so the only way the bank is going to receive f(x) is if x was sent to the key without modification and f(x) was returned to the bank without modification.

      Sure, but x doesn't encapsulate the recipient of the transfer. So if I get an x at one ATM, then I can use it at another fake-ATM, and learn the f(x).

  41. Quicken et al by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised that, as far as I can tell from reading the MSNBC article and the comments so far, the only mention of Quicken is this one, in a fairly negative light.

    One of the tips I was sure they'd include would be to change Keep a watchful eye on your monthly statement, as well as your balance, and report any problems to your bank. to recommend that people sign up for electronic access (Quicken or web access) so they see the crooks' transactions within a day or two.

    As the article mentioned, some people have enough money that they actually don't recognize the drop in the balance as significant, but they'll sure notice when their ATM card was used 10 times at 8 ATMs in 2 days :)

    --
    Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  42. Outsourcing woes, again by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Unhappy to cut-off teller jobs with ATMs, bank now are cutting-off ATMs to independent operators, who charge an arm-and-a-leg in services fee (in addition to the self-cleaning bank accounts we all enjoy).

    The sheer number of independent non-bank ATM operators make it all but impossible for the public to know whether he is using a legitimate ATM or not.

    Eventually, if the banks do nothing to address this problem, their credibility will be so eroded that no one will trust ATMs any more.

  43. pretty poor return by lost+in+place · · Score: 1
    The 'ATM gang' profiled managed to purchase and setup 50+ machines and steal over $4 million from over 21,000 customers.

    Maybe I'm alone here, but this doesn't seem like a very impressive return for their efforts, considering the risk. 50+ machines they had to install, 21K individual potential criminal charges they face, and for what? $4 million dollars. That's cab fare for the average CEO.

  44. Re:old news by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    its just the design philosophy - if your designing a windows based ATM system you are automatically a retard before you even start. thus your whole design is going to suck and your whole way of thinking about the design is going to suck.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  45. So far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three occurrences each of "PIN number" and "ATM machine" in the comments for this story.

    Keep going!

  46. I want to be rich enough........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to lose $3800 and not even notice it!

  47. The banks are at fault by fermion · · Score: 1
    which are later added to false cards and used to empty bank... The 'ATM gang' profiled managed to purchase and setup 50+ machines and steal over $4 million from over 21,000 customers.

    Are we getting poor or what? This means that the average bank customer has under $200 dollars in their bank account. I rather think the it is more likely that each card was used once to get the max allowed money, which in often on the order of a couple hundred dollars.

    On a more serious note, this is a security problem that has been talked about quite a bit in the papers, and the conclusion seems to be that the banking and ATM industry brought upon itself. They set up ATMs in non-bank, non-secure, standalone locations and expect the customer to just trust that these are real ATMs. Of course ATM suppliers are more than happy to sell them to anyone who will fork over the cash. To make matters worse, the banks have been training customers to fall for this scam. The motivation is, of course, greed. The banks get $2-$5 of pretty much pure profit for each transaction. Much of the risk for these standalone machines are assumed by the owners of the machines and the account holder.

    The banks should just refund money to anyone defrauded by such a scam. Ideally, the people who sold the ATMs should be held responsible for damaging the nations financial network.

    On a less serious note, I really think it is funny that they way the picture is labeled in the article it appears that the suspect is in fact part of the Secret Service.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:The banks are at fault by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      According to the article one person's account was drained of $3800... so I gess it all depends on the daily limit of the card and the available funds when the gang was scaming the funds.

      Also... $2-$5 PER transaction at an ATM!? What ATMs do you use so I know which ones to avoid... the most I've seen is $1.50, and the ATM always asks if you want to pay it before completing the transaction.

      Hmm, well it might get as high as $2.50 or $3 if your bank wants to also charge you if the ATM isn't on their network, usually they charge $1 or $1.50 for this "service".

      Oh yea, I am in Canada, so it's probably quite different down in the US-of-A. ;)

    2. Re:The banks are at fault by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      Are we getting poor or what? This means that the average bank customer has under $200 dollars in their bank account.

      Hm, maybe I'm a bit too European-centric, but I see nothing weird in that. In Europe, you have to be crazy to keep your larger savings on your cash account, because it usually has very low interest rate (banks and investment funds offer much better options to invest your savings). It doesn't matter if you are rich or poor, you just don't keep big money on the cash account. Is it any different accross the pond?

  48. The interface would still be a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You cant copy a chipcard like you can a simple magnetic strip ... but as long as the interface is not on your own hardware, the card, they can still hijack the session and rip you off.

    They need to start using cards with their own crypto yes, but they also need to put a LCD on the card so you can see the amount you are transferring (with some basic safeguards to ensure that the amount shown has to have been shown for X seconds before you can confirm, so they cant just flash a new amount on there just as you press the button).

    1. Re:The interface would still be a problem by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      They need to start using cards with their own crypto yes, but they also need to put a LCD on the card so you can see the amount you are transferring

      Or they could just put all transactions in a "pending" state for 90 days or so to make sure the owner of the ATM isn't hijacking sessions, like they already do.

      Trust me, they're not going to make ATM cards that complicated. If anything they're going to make it simpler.

  49. By way of explanation by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    I use Quicken myself... it's a very useful piece of software (running on my wife's Win2K PC, naturally). However, I did get burned by their undocumented boot sector writing when I had to rebuild said PC a year or so ago...

    Intuit's missteps have been discussed to death in this forum, and while I dislike the hassles I was subjected to by their copyright paranoia, I appreciate a useful piece of software.

    So to clarify: I like the program... I dislike the DRM (though they have forsaken that path, thankfully).

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  50. Best one... by djupedal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guy moves fake ATM into position at the mall....hangs a sign on it that says "Temporarily Out of Order - Deposits Only -- Give Deposits to Guard on Duty".

    Guy stands next to machine in a fake uniform and collects the dough :)

    1. Re:Best one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that from American Gods?

    2. Re:Best one... by jechonias · · Score: 1

      it is , i've just finished reading it this weekend.

      jech

  51. German style ATMs by tronicum · · Score: 2, Informative
    In Germany is a regulation which says "if you want to connect a ATM/PC whatever" you have an "bank network". There a guidlines which are checked by some govermental freaks.

    a list of freaks is German officalism (english) there, a German page about the banking freaks is here

    Often they fake only parts of the ATMs system in Germany (reading it at the door, putting slices of plastic on top of the keypads)

    The laws are strange in Germany for that problem. But often if you can prove that it was not your problem, they give you money.

    they want everybody to believe that it IS safe, but it is not.

    1. Re:German style ATMs by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

      That is why each ATM macine has a camera. In Germny many ATMs have three operation lights in a small oval at the top. The middle one doesn't look like there is a led behind it - there isn't it - is a camera.

  52. Malaysia by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    In Malaysia last year, I saw a number of ATMs with signs next to them warning of precisely these dangers. The signs say, essentially, "Watch out for any equipment that may be attached to this ATM that appears unusual. And please be aware that you may be taking a risk by using this ATM at all." And one such sign was next to a machine inside one of those little rooms at a bank branch, mind you.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  53. Virtual account numbers by chiph · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thinking about it, in the context of those "virtual credit card numbers", imagine a special PIN that is good for one transaction.

    The CitiBank virtual credit card account number feature actually doesn't work like you'd expect -- instead of being a "one-time" number, it's actually a "30-day" number. They set the expiration date to the end of the upcoming month to limit the time it's valid. I'm disappointed in the way it works, but the positives still outweigh the negatives so I still plan on using it until something better comes along.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Virtual account numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least your Citibank account is eligible for virtual numbers; according to the online signup system, mine is not.

      Why? I really do not know. I suspect it might be because I have an account that has been around for nearly ten years, and been "acquired" a few times as banks merged together.

    2. Re:Virtual account numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      The CitiBank virtual credit card account number feature actually doesn't work like you'd expect -- instead of being a "one-time" number, it's actually a "30-day" number. They set the expiration date to the end of the upcoming month to limit the time it's valid. I'm disappointed in the way it works, but the positives still outweigh the negatives so I still plan on using it until something better comes along.
      Citibank's "virtual account number" has an optional feature to set a maximum total dollar limit all transactions, and/or setting a longer expiration duration.

      For example, for a web site subscription that automatically bills your account $9.95 a month, you might set the expiration date to one year, and the total maximum as $120.

      I have found that some sites cannot accept the citibank virtual account numbers -- for example, Paypal.

    3. Re:Virtual account numbers by rickliner · · Score: 3, Informative
      Thinking about it, in the context of those "virtual credit card numbers", imagine a special PIN that is good for one transaction.


      The CitiBank virtual credit card account number feature actually doesn't work like you'd expect -- instead of being a "one-time" number, it's actually a "30-day" number. They set the expiration date to the end of the upcoming month to limit the time it's valid. I'm disappointed in the way it works, but the positives still outweigh the negatives so I still plan on using it until something better comes along.


      The Citibank virtual account numbers have options to let you do what you want. When you generate a new number, it can be used with only one merchant. You can set a charge limit amount, the expiration date, or both.

      Next time you try it, click on the "Advanced Options" link instead of the shiny button labeled "Next". Set the limit to the amount you intend to spend. Presto, it's good for exactly one transaction.

      --
      Better to .sig than to .sag
  54. Thanks for the tips, but...Pocket pork. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's nice, but what we really need are tips on how to set these scams up.

    I'm unemployed."

    Become a congressmen. No one will suspect a thing.

  55. Stop with the Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    This isn't foolproof but much safer than using random whitelabels you find in Apu's Mealbar.


    Although I'm sure you probably didn't intend this to be a snub to people of Indian-descent, it was. Quite often I have people ask me which 7-11 I own, or where's my taxi simply because my parents are from India. It would be greatly appreciated if you could refrain from perpetuating this stereotype. I'm not saying you're racist or anything because I'm certain you didn't know how this affects some of us. :)

    1. Re:Stop with the Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...the guy mentioned that choosing to stereo-type the store as Indian owned is just that -- a stereotype (and personally I find that most stores are owned/operated by Asians and Arabs). Going on some xenophobic rant that you hate foreigners seems a little out of place as a reply...

    2. Re:Stop with the Racism by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      What "store"? I just made an off remark to Apu-Meatmart. What I actually meant is ANY low-budget occasionally questionable but often decent restaurant run by non-franchised market droid americans.

      It wasn't meant to be a racist remark of any sort. It's the truth that low-budget restaurants often have whitelabels [though I should eat my feet as McD's as whitelabels too occasionally].

      Besides I'm no xenophobic. I often spend a shitload more time than I have to in public places. It doesn't mean I like what people do, just that I don't hide from it [nor do I actively go out and try to stop them...]

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Stop with the Racism by jellybear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Are you saying Simpsons is racist? Because Simpsons happens to be my favorite show. So watch it, buster

    4. Re:Stop with the Racism by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      I can't remember why I had you as a foe, but after reading this rant, you're now a friend. Very insightful.

    5. Re:Stop with the Racism by jhunsake · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why are you backing down? Now you're a fag!

    6. Re:Stop with the Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot. He didn't say "Stupid sand nigger mart", he said "Apu." For all you know he could be referencing the character on The Simpsons who happens to be of some sort of sand nigger descent. So just shut your whiney fucking arab mouth and go wash your taxi.

    7. Re:Stop with the Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      You're exaggerting your case to make a point you think is valid but ironically in so doing, you're perpetuating hatreds. I don't believe your claims (unless you were behind the counter at the 7-11 or sitting on the hood of a cab), although I think you probably believe that people do say such things to Indians on a regular basis. I think such outrageously ignorant questions, if indeed they were ever directed at you, would only by said by someone so profoundly stupid that their "racism" would be a mere sidebar to their other issues. Hate to rain on your pity-party, but this is by no means the norm in the U.S.

      Politically Correct Disease has created a world in which the most isolated, absurd behaviors are not rightly dismissed as nonsense but held up as examples of general de facto racism. This is patently absurd. Have people ever been nice to you? What percentage have said these strange things? Does anyone ever mistake you for a doctor or scientist (other possible Indian stereotypes that are more flattering)?

      Pull yourself up, take a deep breath, wipe your snivelling nose, and get on with your life, you poor, lying, perpetually victimized Indian moron.

      Thank you.

    8. Re:Stop with the Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OWNED!

    9. Re:Stop with the Racism by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Backing down? I never stepped up!!!

      I really do hate their habits. I'm just not burning crosses with a nazi emblem and a "I beat jews" t-shirt.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    10. Re:Stop with the Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... you insensitive clod!

  56. Pet Peeve Alert! by ml10422 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Setup", "login", "logout", "logon", "logout" are nouns.
    "Set up", "log in", "log out", "log on", "log out" are verbs.

  57. Possible solution by cartman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly what's necessary is to have a small keypad on the card itself, as well as a small CPU, a private key that is encrypted by the user's PIN, and the public key of the bank. That way, all communication between the card and the bank can be encrypted, and no unencrypted information is ever sent through the ATM.

    Such a card would not be much larger than current ATM cards.

    The worst fraud that could then be perpetrated is to have a fake ATM that deducts $20 from your account but without dispensing the $20. But that scheme would be very quickly identified.

    1. Re:Possible solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a smartcard and has been in existence for many years. Instead of relying on brain-dead magnetic stripe with your account number, an ecrypted exchange of that information can be performed from a smartcard chip.

      US is way behind the world when it comes to these things, unfortunately.

    2. Re:Possible solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a card would be a lot more expensive than the cheap plastic magnetic-strip cards we have now.

    3. Re:Possible solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mobile phone would be ideal for that. Make it communicate to ATM via some sort of wireless and use something like SRP, http://srp.stanford.edu/ , that would use PIN and strong key stored on the phone for authentification. SRP ensures not only strong encryption but also that the other end is authentic one without ever exposing your PIN or strong key to it!

      In this way person would need to capture both PIN and the mobile phone which hard unless they want to put a gun to your head.

  58. Re:Ummm... by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

    It is not incorrect strictly speaking, but you have a point, it is poorly worded. BTW it was supposed to be expose with the accent on the last 'e'. Seriously though, get a life. ;)

  59. Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another example of the media creating a culture of fear that keeps corporate America and our goverment in dough. 21,000 out of millions of American's, not much to worry about.

  60. and don't forget... by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    that there are *laws* to protect you from cc fraud! it appears that if your debit card is defrauded, you're outta luck!

    eric

    1. Re:and don't forget... by Chemical · · Score: 1
      Not so. Wells Fargo gave back the $180 that was fraudulently charged to my card. It was a hassle and it took a week, but I lost nothing in the end.

      Apparently it's no money out of Wells Fargo's pocket either. The party that accepts the stolen card is in the end responsible.

    2. Re:and don't forget... by eht · · Score: 1

      Two banks that I've had debit cards with have fraud protection on them, Citibank and HSBC both provide some type of fraud protection, both of them similar to the type on credit cards ie the first 50$ is out of your pocket, the rest is out of theirs.

    3. Re:and don't forget... by swb · · Score: 1

      It was a hassle and it took a week, but I lost nothing in the end.

      This is the hidden problem with debit card fraud. Until the matter is resolved, you *are* out whatever the amount is. Banks like to promote how willing they are to resolve these in your favor, but they're not willing enough to give you the money back right away.

      Credit card fraud at worst will cost you part of your maximum spending limit while the matter is resolved; it's money out of someone else's pocket at that point.

    4. Re:and don't forget... by Luzumsuz+Lazim · · Score: 1
      This is the hidden problem with debit card fraud. Until the matter is resolved, you *are* out

      Not true. Once I withdrawn $200 using my debit card from a 3rd party ATM (belongs to well known bank other than my bank), but it didn't eject any cash although it charged my account (broken mechanics, broken software ?)

      I called my bank the same day, and they reversed the transaction immediately and told me that it will stay this way, until the issue is investigated. 2 weeks later I received a letter stating that my claim was approved.

      Maybe we are at the mercy of the banking institute, but I should note that my bank (Fleet Bank) is not so innocent considering how they are using their monopoly power in our area. So, I would be surprised if this kind of solution is not mandated by law.

    5. Re:and don't forget... by swb · · Score: 1

      It might just be market pressure. Banks desperately want to hang on to debit cards and have them be successful, as there are fewer fees associated with them for merchants, which means an opportunity for business expansion. Just this weekend I happened to be in a fast food restaurant that had left an industry trade rag around. It was amusing reading, and there was even a story mentioning the benefits of accepting debit cards vs. credit cards.

      Regardless, I'd be much happier if all debit transactions *required* 72 hours to post ("I lost my card") and required a manditory transaction reversal reinstatement pending investigation ("Your loss before mine"). It's not enough that banks do it because they like to, it needs to be law.

  61. American Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bank robbery in American Gods was far simpler, required no fancy hardware, no weapons, and no delay to take the money out of people's accounts later.

    iirc, it took an existing atm, some tape, a security guard uniform, a bag, and a business card. Hm, and a payphone nearby.

  62. Why ATM fees piss off people by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason that ATM fees piss people off is that when the banks put them in and closed branched because of it, the banks said the ATMs would be free.

    Big shock, they lied.

  63. oh shit! by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Troll

    You mean that coin-operated dick cleaner near Michael Jackson's ranch was really just a ..........oh God! I am so embarrassed.

  64. And credit cards by RogerWilco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as credit cards exist, I'm not going to complain about the insecurity of ATM's.

    --
    RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    1. Re:And credit cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have to complain about the insecurity of credit cards then.

  65. Murphys waiting for them too! by strangedays · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is a popular ATM "modus operandi".

    Thieves, hotwire a backhoe, drive it a couple of miles and use it to liberate an ATM from wherever, drop it into a truck and get the hell outa Dodge.

    Imagine the disappointment when they get it home... if one of these fake ATM's gets selected for a backhoe style type smash and grab theft. Plus, imagine the disappointment for the original ATM fakers.... Delicious.

    Murphys law says its gotta happen sometime!

    Organized crime?, Nah!, for my money, its not really all that well organized....

    --
    There is no god; get over it already! Never exchange a walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage.
    1. Re:Murphys waiting for them too! by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      The ATM's in question actually work, they are hooked up to the banking network and they DO dispense cash as usual.

      However, they also keep a copy of your card details and your PIN number so the thieves can make a copy of your card, which they then use on an "official" ATM machine.

      Even if someone stole an ATM with a "fake front" on it, they would also get the real ATM machine, and thus all the cash in it.

      Check out the article, they do explain it in detail. ;)

    2. Re:Murphys waiting for them too! by dogdaze · · Score: 1

      This actually happened in the area I live in. Someone went to the local arena and somehow lifted the ATM and stole the whole thing. Total take according to the local paper - 110,000 dollars. It was later found about 175 miles away.

  66. No Open Source? by Com2Irq5 · · Score: 1

    Who's with me to start an open source project to write an a program that can interfaces with an ATM?

  67. atms on ebay by upt1me · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are also ATM machines on ebay for sale.

    1. Re:atms on ebay by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried and tried to find an Automatic Teller Machine machine which would make ATMs so I could set up a broad fraud covering all of California, but all I could find was ATMs, not ATM machines.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  68. you forgot the rest by alex_ant · · Score: 0

    Forget ATMs coming under attack by worms, MSNBC has this article about Dateline NBC's investigative report into fake ATMs and other ATM related scams.

    Two sentences spliced together with a comma --> one incorrect sentence. Also, "ATM related" should be hyphenated

    The 'ATM gang' profiled managed to purchase and setup 50+ machines and steal over $4 million from over 21,000 customers.

    I can't believe people pay for this shite.

  69. Low-tech ATM user victimization by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Informative
    Just after the students come back all flushed with their grants (and no idea that once their board and lodgings are taken into account they have about 5.00 a week to spend of food) the most prevalent kind of ATM theft round here is also the simplest:

    Knife in back, 'take out all your money or I'll kill you'.

    A few people get stung with that every year... not a lot that can stop it either (cameras help, but they're not everywhere).

    What could help is the "duress code".

    Many office alarm systems have a feature where entering the disarm code backwards (1234 becomes 4321) will work like the real code, while also triggering a silent alarm, summoning the police.

    Since colleges nearly always have an on-campus 24-hour security staff, it should be possible for help to arrive in time to catch the attacker, or at least to rush the victim to the hospital before she bleeds out.

  70. Fake bank atms are the least of your worries by rcamans · · Score: 0

    Far more money gets stolen by dishonest tellers and bank personnel than fake or rigged atms.
    These people, when caught, do not get prosecuted, because the banks do not want anyone to know of the level of internal crime.
    So the criminals get fired.
    They go to another bank, apply for a job, and get hired, because when the bank calls up the old bank, all they can say is yes, they used to work here.
    I am certain of this, because I once dated a bank teller who did this.
    Also, the people who take your credit card applications (one stole my wife's grandpa's card), and store tellers who impress your credit card onto the carbon paper system, and anyone who has access to the discarded paper from impressing machines (that would be anyone).
    People who make mistakes on their deposit slips and throw them away (I got hit indirectly by this one), etc.
    These criminals take orders of magnitude more money than all the atm scams combined.
    Be afraid. Be very afraid.

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  71. "Catch me if you can" anecdote by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sometime in the mid- to early-90s, I read the book "Catch me if you can" by con-artist-turned-security-consultant Frank Abagnale. You may have seen the recent Spielberg movie based on this. This was in the pre-ATM days, but if I recall correctly, one of his scams was similar. First he would go to a uniform store and get a security guard uniform. Then he would have a professional looking sign printed up saying something like: "Night deposit out of order -- Leave deposit with security guard."

    Anyway, at night, he would put up the sign and station himself outside a bank's night deposit drop box with a big bin. He says people would actually come up and toss bags of cash into the bin, because they just had an innate trust of people in uniform.

    1. Re:"Catch me if you can" anecdote by KamuZ · · Score: 1

      Not in Mexico! :)

      We don't trust people in uniform... really sad

  72. You need a realignment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you do. Regulation is not completely bad. Why should the crooks be enabled by the market? that's what de-regulation does. This kind of philosophy needs to get out of the political system.

  73. Bug Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please upgrade this post to the "bold" font-style, which will increase its impact and ensure that people pay it the heed it is due.

    Also, try to make the content a little less whiny next time. It's a real turnoff to be cruising around the -1 neighborhood and run headlong into this steaming pile of self pity.

  74. mmhmm... by stile · · Score: 1

    It ain't going to do you any good, if you can't even spell it.

  75. I don't have to worry about ATM fraud. by darkonc · · Score: 2, Funny

    My bank account's always empty anyways... If they tried to empty it, the bank would ask them to deposit money first.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  76. one-time PINs by stile · · Score: 2, Informative

    A one-time or limited-use PIN is a great idea, but unfortunately, it won't be so simple under the current system...

    Unfortunately, the way a PIN is generated is by hashing your bank account number with a special key that only the bank knows. The result is mapped to the digits 0-9 somehow, and that's your PIN.

    1. Re:one-time PINs by thre5her · · Score: 1

      Hell no. You can change your PIN whenever you want. In fact, when I applied for a card less than a month ago, the agent had me write my desired PIN on a sticky note and hand it over. Since PINs are arbitrary in the first place, one-time PINs are definitely feasible.

  77. faux fronts by xixax · · Score: 1

    I actually took quite a while for the banks to capture a complete faux-front. It seems they are very careful not to leave them on for too long, and they do blend in with the ATM quite well. For a while, my bank's ATM would post a toll-free number to call if you noticed anything suspicious attached to the ATM.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  78. A Per-Use fee is not the only way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I don't understand why some people accept some fees and not others.

    • When I go to a bookstore, there are armchairs there that I can use to sit down if I want to read a few pages of books I'm considering buying. Those armchairs cost money to buy and clean, but I don't have to pay a special armchair-surchange if someone sees me sitting in one.
    • When I go to a supermarket, I get the free loan of a grocery cart to wheel my groceries around. These carts cost the supermarket money -- there's no grocery-cart-fairy dropping them all over -- but still I don't see a guy standing next to the cart-corral charging a quarter to use one.

    The point is there are many examples of business providing services for "free", usually because they think they'll get more customers as an indirect consequence, or they fear getting a bad reputation and losing customers if they don't provide a service that their competitors provide. Of course businesses must recover their costs, but a per-use fee is not the best or only way to do so.

    So just because someone suggests that ATM fees piss them off, this doesn't mean they're oblivious to the fact that ATMs cost money to buy and operate. Instead, they're suggesting that they'd like it better if businesses recovered their costs in some other way -- for example -- the same way that they recover the costs of using credit cards.

    This thread started with credit cards, and guess what -- it's not free for a business to accept credit cards either. They have to pay the credit card company every time someone makes a purchase. So when credit cards first came out, businesses would tack on a 5% fee if you wanted to pay with a card. Someone like you might have made a comment like yours defending this "credit-card-use" fee. "Nobody puts a gun to your head and makes you pay with a credit card. The credit card network and database cost money." Yada yada..

    But people did complain -- and today those fees are largely gone. If you go to a convenience store, the prices listed on the shelves are the same prices you pay whether you use cash or credit. Of course, this just means that stores have absorbed the costs of dealing with the credit-card companies into their prices, so today someone paying cash is paying "more than they should" to subsidize customers who pay with credit cards. Do you think this was a good change? Do you approve of this?

    Whether or not you do, there's no reason this can't or won't happen to ATMs. A convenience store owner might buy and install an ATM that charges no fee, just because he's expects customers who come in to use the ATM might buy something on the way out -- or because all the other convenience stores around already have free ATMs and his store would get a bad reputation if he didn't have one too. In a world like this, the convenience store owner would just have to raise all his prices a little to compensate.

    If you approve of ATM fees, would you like to see credit-card-use fees come back too? How about fees for using the convenience-store bathroom? Is there such a thing as being "nickle-and-dimed" to death? Personally I like that credit-card fees have gone away, and I would like ATM fees to go too, even if prices rose overall a little to compensate.

    Just my opinion...
    1. Re:A Per-Use fee is not the only way by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      What you said is all absolutely correct. You don't need to tell me about merchant account fees...I run a small business myself, and we accept credit cards, and about 1.5% of every transaction goes to EFS Merchant Services, instead of into my bank account :)

      Truly, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Your armchair at the book store is paid for everytime you buy a book. The pint of ice cream you bought today pays for that cart at the grocery store. Essentially, some fees are up front, some fees are hidden. Ultimately, they all get paid anyway.

      Now, let's look at the specific case of ATMs. When I have an account at Bank A, but not at Bank B, and I access my Bank A account with Bank B's ATM, located at their branch, how the hell is Bank B possibly supposed to make money off that transaction unless I pay a fee? I'm not banking at Bank B. I'm not buying a Snicker's bar there or anything. What are they supposed to do? Provide the service of using their ATM to me, for free? For absolutely no reason whatsoever? No! They charge a fee, and they're absolutely right to do so. If you don't want to pay that fee, then drive the extra 5 miles to get to bank A and use the ATM there.

      You say: Personally I like that credit-card fees have gone away, and I would like ATM fees to go too, even if prices rose overall a little to compensate.

      The problem is, you don't seem to understand why credit card fees have gone away. They went away because the business that tacked those fees on found another way to make money. What's the other way that Bank B makes money when you withdraw money from your Bank A account? There isn't any. Like I said, I own a small business that accepts credit cards. We don't charge anything extra to use credit cards because we want our customers to feel like we're convienient. We eat those costs, so we get more sales. If Bank B eats the cost to access Bank A's network...what do they get? Nothing. Solve that problem, and you'll see Bank B's fees disappear. In the meantime, find another way to get your money if you don't want to pay the fees.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:A Per-Use fee is not the only way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your example about using an ATM at Bank B to access Bank A. But I was actually talking about those "smaller ATMs" that I find in convenience stores / gas stations / etc. They all start with "the owner of this ATM charges a $1.50 fee in addition to any fee charged by your bank."

      In that case the owner of the ATM is the gas station owner who has every reason to expect that I might buy a candy bar even though I only walked in to use the ATM.

      Usually, because I'm pissed off at his fee, I make a conscious decision to walk out without looking right or left.

    3. Re:A Per-Use fee is not the only way by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      That may or may not be the case. The "smaller ATM" may or may not be owned by the owner of the gas station, and he may or may not have to pay the gas station owner to put his ATM there. It all depends on how much business the gas station owner gets from the ATM's presence. Honestly, I find it hard to believe that enough people would come into the gas station for the purpose of using the ATM, and then buy something while they were there, to make it worth the gas station's owner's while. You have to sell a hell of a lot of Snicker's bars to pay for that ATM.

      Ultimately, market forces and competition always win out. Next time you feel like using an ATM at a gas station, and they want to charge you a fee to use it, tell off the guy behind the counter, who hopefully will pass that on to the station owner.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    4. Re:A Per-Use fee is not the only way by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      Here in the Pittsburgh area, I notice that EVERY ATM machine charges $1.50, unless it's owned by the bank and you're a member of that bank. So going to the gas station or the bar to use the ATM is no more expensive than going to another bank.

      This was not the case when I lived in CA. Banks would charge $1.00 for non-customers, but if you went to a convenience store, or any ATM machine in a non-bank location, you'd end up paying $2.50 - $3.00. Quartzsite, AZ and Blythe, CA were the worst for that kind of junk. Tiny towns in the middle of nowhere...

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    5. Re:A Per-Use fee is not the only way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to sell a hell of a lot of Snicker's bars to pay for that ATM.


      No one forced them to put the ATM in.

  79. Best Way? by superultra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Use your debit card at Wal-Mart or your local drug store, buy a stick of gum, and get $XX amount of cash back. And at the rate it's going, there'll be as many Wal-Marts as there are ATMs. Saves yourself a fee AND is much safer.

    That is, until someone builds a false Wal-Mart to get your account information.

  80. Re:Tijuana, Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god! I have to go to that. The Dude definitely abides!

  81. What a brilliant way to launder money! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    I just checked out SwipeUSA. They say either you, the owner,
    can fill the machine or they will do it for you. Now this
    sounds to me like an open invitation for Tony and Vito to launder money. Put ATM's in as many places as you can, wether its a business you are already 'associated' with or not. Fill it with your dirty money, in comes clean money for your Grand Caymans front company. Sweep the money every night out of GCI to your account in a bank domiciled in a 'no reciprocity with USA' country.

    Then again.. maybe casinos are easier!

  82. Even smartcards are not a solution. by sonamchauhan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmm.. The problem is that ATM cards can be so easily forged.

    Banks should switch to contactless cards with a tiny processor and display that (a) stays in control of the user at all times, and (b) allows the user to authorise *individual* cash/ATM transactions. It would be akin to a small palm-pilot with public-key cryotography and an IRDA link, but credit card sized, so it fit in your wallet... or is built into your wallet. The only way this could be defeated is by breaking the crypto, or by capturing the device itself and obtaining it's password.

    Without an interface on a device in your control, even smart-cards can be defeated by the "false-front" ATMs mentioned in this article (you withdraw $20, the "false-front" ATM actually withdraws $1000, dispenses $20, and pockets the $980 difference).

    1. Re:Even smartcards are not a solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm affraid you're DEADLY wrong. While smartcards aren't perfect they're certainly cure for skimming, false frontends and other low-tech frauds.

      SC (smartcard) has private RSA key. Once it is loaded it can't be recovered. SC does all crypto but only when correct PIN is entered. Enter wrong PIN 10 times and SC will burn itself. Once the SC signed and encrypted message for the authorization server, there's no way to alter it UNLESS you know private key. Sorry.

      There're problems with SC-s but they're certainly better than magnetic strip cards.

  83. After I set up the ATM... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

    "First I emptied the checking account and then I hit the mall, and there in the window was this sexy little outfit, and oh my gosh, I just had to have it! Fifteen hundred dollars for a leather bustier? I didn't care, it lifts and separates. Heh. Plus, it's not like I'm actually paying for it. Hehehe, ah."

  84. One another card scam by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    The bank card scam that is really popular these days in Quebec is replacing the machines where you swipe your bank card or credit card at the counter. The machine records the number on your card and the PIN you enter, then plays the modem sound to make you believe that it called to your bank and accepts the transaction, even though you might have entered the wrong PIN number.

    A lot of gas stations have been found guilty of using such devices, though it was often done in less fortuned areas and organized crime was always involved. I think I read somewhere that the "roumanian mafia" (WTF? italian, ok, russian, meh, but roumanian?) was behind the scam. It's been around for a year now in different part of the province.

    I never heard about ATM scams so far though.

    1. Re:One another card scam by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      The Romanians aren't the only ones to do this scam. I've read that the Triads, and I believe the Yakuza are doing similar scams, and the Triads have already been branching out to doing the fake-ATM scam. Just goes to show, the only ATM it's really safe to use is an ATM at your bank. Either that, or use checks.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  85. atm security is pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I should know, I worked with a company that provided them. All I can say is that after working there for a week, I was scared to put my card in one.

    This is one of those instances where security by obscurity is obviously working, at least somewhat... as most people don't have access to one to play around with.

    They use absolutely no encryption, as they are not required to until something like 2006. And even though it's there, it's not on (at least with Diebold machines). Many have a network cable running into the back of them, so you could plug in a hub and sniff the data. What will this get you? It will get you the ip of the authentication server it talks to and the format of the responses. This would allow you to forge your own authentication server and use some network trickery with a linux box or two and a hub/switch to make any card run through the machine be accepted.

    The ones that don't have network cables usually have phone lines. A little known fact is that if you plug two modems together directly, you can still dial the other one and it will pick up and negotiate. You could certainly use this to stick a linux box in between and sniff the data that goes over the network and perform something similar to the above.

    Probably the most secure ones are the ones that use GSM or GPRS to communicate as you'd need some expensive equipment to do anything with that, and they are typically inside the unit, so you'd have to break it open somehow so you can't get at the wires.

    There are methods in use right now that the ATM companies have absolutely no idea how they work. I'd see memos floating around all the time. They put machines under surveillance for months, and all of a sudden, everyone who had used the machine got ripped off. Yet, no one, as far as they could tell, ever physically did anything to the machine. Theives are using some really sophisticated techniques right now, and about the only way to thwart this is to start using crypto, both for transit, and on your card.

    Oh, ever wonder why most machines have been retrofitted with a card swiper instead of an eater? It's because people were putting stuff inside of it so cards would jam, and then they would sit across the parking lot with a spotting scope and watch a person type their pin. When the person couldn't get their card out and left, they would come by with a little extraction tool, take the card, and go on an ATM spree.

    1. Re:atm security is pathetic by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Oh, ever wonder why most machines have been retrofitted with a card swiper instead of an eater? It's because people were putting stuff inside of it so cards would jam, and then they would sit across the parking lot with a spotting scope and watch a person type their pin. When the person couldn't get their card out and left, they would come by with a little extraction tool, take the card, and go on an ATM spree.

      I've heard of that scam being called "The Lebonese Loop". Our local newspapers warned against it six months ago, but it's been around for years.

    2. Re:atm security is pathetic by Ravenseye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait a minute.

      ATM' are required to be on the DES III standard by 2006. Meanwhile, they all encrypt using standard DES. Even then, the WAN wired ones re-encrypt on the banks private network on the way out to the switch (NYCE, SUM, VISA, etc.). There is NO current ATM network driver that currently accepts un-encrypted transmission. If they did, thieves wouldn't need to set up little card readers to scoop the data, they'd just crack the lines.

      Very few WAN operated ATM's use IP. It's just too insecure. Most run serial cables to a FRAD or something similar inside the bank which then sends out a transmission using IP over private, encrypted lines. No one wants to have to address each ATM since the network provider tends to use their own proprietary scheme anyway (ATM Identifier, Poll Select, etc.).

      Data leaving the ATM does NOT include a customers PIN. Authentication is done in the box and never sent out. Again, that's why the thieves need the camera and / or card.

      Card swipers are cheaper to make and easier to fix. The real reason they are used instead of eaters is because far too many customers walk away from the ATM leaving their card hanging out of the slot. We get a few every day turned in by honest customers or dropped in the night drops of our branches. Card swipers solve that problem. They also won't eat a card that a customer accidently used...like their department store card instead of their ATM card. We get a lot of those too, especially around these holidays!

    3. Re:atm security is pathetic by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Data leaving the ATM does NOT include a customers PIN.

      Then data going into the ATM must include a customers PIN. Otherwise, how could the PIN be checked?

    4. Re:atm security is pathetic by Ravenseye · · Score: 1

      PIN's are entered into the ATM through the keypad and they are checked against a hash downloaded into the machine twice a day. A PBF (Positive Balance File) is loaded twice a day as well. This is how you can get cash if the network is down. Your PIN is never transmitted. If the entire machine is stolen, there are still no PIN's in it...only the hash. This is also the reason why those machines that have been entirely stolen in the past have not been compromised to get at the customers PIN's.

    5. Re:atm security is pathetic by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      PIN's are entered into the ATM through the keypad and they are checked against a hash downloaded into the machine twice a day.

      So you claim that every single ATM machine in the world has the PIN number of every single ATM cardholder in the world? I don't believe you.

      If the entire machine is stolen, there are still no PIN's in it...only the hash.

      There are only 10,000 possible pin numbers. It would be easy to brute force the pin number given a "hash." I don't believe you.

    6. Re:atm security is pathetic by Ravenseye · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter if you believe me, that's how it works. It also uses the last four digits of the ATM card to figure out which network to settle with....NYCE, SUM, etc. When you use your ATM card, NO transaction begins with the switch until AFTER your PIN has been confirmed. The hash is safe because it still needs the card. That's why if you fail with your PIN, the issuing bank and the servicing network will NOT know about it. Only the owner of the ATM will see the problem on their electronic journal. It also saves bandwidth for the satellite, ISDN and dial-up ATM's which pay for data transfer.

      I service these things every day. That's how it works. I can understand why you find it hard to believe, but that's what happens!

  86. Be careful! ATM/MAC/Debit is *NOT* Insured! by cybrthng · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you loose money through the ATM/Debit network you will never see it! These networks are *NOT* insured.

    Only visit your local branch to get cash with your debit/ATM card and use a Visa/Mastercard "CheckCard" for other purchases.

    1. You will be insured.
    2. Visa/Mastercard provier fraud protection
    3. MAC/ATM/DEBIT is a bank fraud in itself. What is up with those FEES, especially since they don't guarantee or insure the transaction!

  87. Back in time... by kwenda · · Score: 1

    Gee, I sure wish that I had said something about this like a year ago...

  88. Another suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use ATMs all the time, but being the paranoid type, I don't keep more than ~$200 in my cheque account. Just get your bank to disallow ATM access of your savings account and transfer money online when needed.

  89. Re:STEPS IN OVERCOMING ANAL MASTURBATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me crazy but I LOLed at that

  90. Signatures on the card. by JKConsult · · Score: 1

    I never understood the point of having the signature on the back of the card. By signing it, you're giving the thief an example of your signature, and it takes a person about 2 minutes to learn to forge a reasonable enough copy of your signature to pass a Best Buy clerk's eyeball test. Then it becomes harder to contest, because the signature is somewhat close to yours. I'd rather have them not know what my signature looks like and be able to point to it and say "That's not even close."

  91. bank robots by slothman32 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I once read somewhere in an old magazine from the 1980 or so about "bank robots." Has anybody heard ATMs called these before?

    --
    Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  92. secureid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RSA has a neat little device called a SecureID, which is about the size of a pack of matches or a very small pager - it has an LCD on it that displays a 6 digit number that changes every 20 seconds or so. A lot of companies use this as a two-factor security device - you need both a password/pin as well as the number on the device to gain access.

    I imagine that this would be an excelent application for a credit card sized flexible computer.

  93. RE:WHAT THE FUCK IS "ON THE SPOKE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE AER NO SPOKE!!!!!!11 THEIR AER A DIFFERENCE BETWIXT KNOWING TEH PATHXOR AND WALKING TEH PATHXOR!!!!112 YUO CNAOT BE TOLD WAHT IS ON TEH SPOKE!!!!!11 YUO CAN ONLY LERN BY GOING ON TEH SPOKE!!!!112

    THEIR AER NO LOWERCASE ON TEH SPOKE!!!!11

  94. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "fraud" committed using a "fake ATM". Make sense?

  95. Why are Fake ATMs still possible? by binnyg · · Score: 1

    It has been about 30 years since the invention of smart cards. Using a smart card with a challenge-response mechanism should make it almost impossible for a fraud to happen. It would also make it convenient to access ATMs as you dont need to enter your pin.. well maybe there still is a pin to protect you in case you lose the smart card itself. I think the banks have not introduced smart cards to keep the costs of the card readers and the cards low. What should be done to drive the banks towards better technology?

    1. Re:Why are Fake ATMs still possible? by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      No, the reason the challenge system hasn't been pushed through is because it would cost a ton to operate.

      Typically the way that an ATM works is in this order.

      1. Customer swipes card.
      2. Customer enters pin.
      3. Machine encrypts pin.
      4. Machine dials out and connects to 3rd party authorization service at 300 baud.
      5. Third party serivce connects to bank, authorizes/declines withdrawls if it can.
      6. Machine stays on the line for 30 seconds to get a reply.
      7. If there is a reply sends an ACK and spits out the cash.
      7b. If the machine is only able to spit out a percentage of the requested cash (it's out of money or jammed etc), only then will it redial and do reversal of the non-dispensed cash back to the customers account.

      The big thing here is speed of the transactions. The third party runs an 800 line for all those atm's to dial into. 20 more secondes per transaction at 1000 transactions a minute can spell HUGE cash losses which then trickle down to atm owners etc.

      It would take legislation to require this, otherwise whoever doesn't do it will be able to charge less to the atm owners per transaction, and will get most of the business.

      It took an act of congress just to get the 3rd party authorization services to upgrade to DES3. (more data, more time)

  96. RE: banks and service by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Yep! The original poster is exactly right! What reason or incentive do you really have to give all of your money to a business, if they're not going to provide you with something in return for the ability to borrow your money to make themselves more money?

    Banks thrive primarily because society has become addicted to the ease of paying for items electronically. We like the convenience of such things as "direct deposit" and credit or debit cards.

    The question is, how long are these basic concepts going to keep the banking industry going? They sure seem to be experimenting to see just how many services they can take away or charge extra for before customers walk away.

    Most checking accounts don't even pay interest anymore, unless you keep some huge amount of money in the account at all times. Even the "special services" we're accustomed to trusting banks to provide are diminishing. Just the other day, I needed to have a document notarized - so I called one of the larger branches of my bank to make sure a notary public would be available when I wanted to drop by. Guess what? It turns out they haven't had a notary public for at least several months now - and they could only give me the name of ONE branch in my city that still had one!

    Another friend of mine needed some foreign currency before embarking on a business trip - and he had a nearly impossible time getting it. Only one bank branch was equipped to convert his funds to the currency he needed - and when he got there, he was told the foreign funds weren't actually on-hand. He had to give them 48 hours to obtain the money and then come back!

  97. Everybody Should Avoid Credit Cards All Together by pballsim · · Score: 1

    I always remember the Dilbert cartoon where Dilbert is talking with Dogbert and a restaurant stating why he doesn't trust ATM machines. He gives his credit card to the waitress and she comes back with a fur coat.

    But the truth is, they can bug ATM but a dishonest working at a store can get your credit card. It's really quite easy I would imagine. One time I had a clerk throw away my receipt (since he screwed up). I went and grabbed it because it had my credit card number.

    It's sometimes even easy, just by looking through the trash. Just find a store that gives the complete credit card number information on the receipt and find them on the ground or in the garbage.

    The chances of them ripping off an ATM is probably less than a waiter/waitress/clerk, etc. can rip you off.

    Okay, so let's get rid of all credit cards. We are back to checks. Well, the phone company and electric company can take out money from my checking account, they just a number. So does that mean if somebody finds an old check they can get money from my account?!

    My advice only accept cash, put it in a fire/water proof safe, bury it. Buy a shotgut with armor piercing bullets, don't sleep and just sit in front of the money shotting anybody who comes close!

  98. Posting AC - Information you should know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm posting this AC because I don't want my friends/coworkers who surf slashdot to associate my nick with this post.

    I work for the largest company in the USA that verifies the transaction between the bank and the cardholder. We are as you could put it, an ISP for ATM's. We are very large, and I've worked for them for quite a number of years.

    We heard about these scams a few years ago, it's nothing new. There are a few things you can do to protect yourself.

    1. Wait for a prompt before entering your pin number. I have never heard of a "cover" system so complex that they will respond correctly on the screen when a card is put in the slot. Rogue ATM's are another matter.

    2. If a white box ATM eats your card, call your bank immediately to report the card stolen/eaten. This is because most of these systems are just a camera and a box to hold stolen cards and pin numbers. Unfortunately the days of getting your card back when it gets eaten are gone. With new regulations there's just no way, get a new one.

    3. All ATM's in this country (usa) are required by law to have a phone number of the institution that is authorizing the transactions, and a notice of surcharge on it. If you don't see those, then there could be "something" covering them. They went to a lot of work to make that fake ATM cover, why would they want you alerting someone who would send out a repair technician?

    Please don't go clamoring for more regulation. A lot of the regulation in place keeps us from properly helping people in distress, and does almost nothing to help secure them. Besides, most people only need securing from themselves.

    1. Re:Posting AC - Information you should know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm posting this AC because I don't want my friends/coworkers who surf slashdot to associate my nick with this post.


      We know it's you, Sam. Don't worry, I posted some jokes on SCO today, too.

  99. Americans are backwards! by Marcello_M · · Score: 1

    Ha! Poor americans! We Italians have been doing this kind of scam for years! If you need training and/or extra information of the subject, I suggest you come visit us (Naples is especially suted for the job, but basically any large city will do) and take a CM (Con Master) degree.

    --
    Marcello Missiroli Vice-President of ERLUG
  100. me too! by jamesh · · Score: 1

    I have a homeloan package with my bank (in Australia). The only fee they charge me is $8/month (I could have chosen a slightly higher interest rate on the homeloan but for at least the next 10 years that equates to more than $8/month).
    In return the interest from my bank account offsets the homeloan account, and therefore doesn't count as income for tax purposes, and I get enough free transactions that i've never been charged a fee for any banking in the last 2.5 years!!!

    Shop around!

  101. Banks don't _want_ secure ATMs by zakkie · · Score: 0, Troll

    When ATM fraud is committed, the individual whose account is stolen from takes the fall. When banks are robbed at gunpoint, it isn't feasible to make just one account holder carry the can for it, so it has to be amortised over a number of accounts. It is obviously cheaper for the banks to allow relatively easy ATM crime than to be robbed at a branch. Remember, no-one ever steals from banks - they only steal from you. Both the banks and the "criminals" I mean...

    1. Re:Banks don't _want_ secure ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are the victim of ATM fraud, you DO get your money back in almost every case, dumbass. Conspiracy theories are cool and stuff, but this one is just stupid. And damn me for feeding a troll.

  102. How I avoid this by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Because I check my transactions very frequently (for budget and other purposes), I would notice immediatly if something was wrong and there was a transaction that I didnt make. Then, I would report it to the bank.

    1. Re:How I avoid this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not "avoiding" it.

  103. it isn't racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    People are assuming you're productively employed, or better yet, incredibly ambitious and taxpaying (owning the 7-11).


    Now if you were black with a Caddilac, you'd be pimpin ho's and poppin crack. That's racism.

  104. This is very big in London right now by mattrumpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd never heard of this kind of fraud until about 2 months ago. In that time my flatmate had 500 taken withdrawn from her account, a good friend had 1500 pounds taken from a number of ATMs and a work mate has just been done for about 800 pounds. That's just the people I know personally!

    I've also heard second hand of two other incidents, girlfriends cousin being one of them. According to the cops crooks are using "skimmers" on the card slots of ATMs and camera's or "shoulder surfing" to get the pins.

    So watch out in London right now is the message I guess.

    --
    Who's with me?! I SAID... WHO'S WITH ME!!??
  105. In Brazil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Brazil the ATMs have a very clever solution for these problems:

    1) You type all information in touch screens (very dificult to tap into... but easy to everybody read... wait for 2 :)

    2) every time you came to "login" at the machine, the 10 algarisms are ramdomly rearranged in 5 buttons... so even if you see me entering my password, you cant do the same next time because the algarisms would be arranged in a different order... and they will only chane orgder again after a sucessfull login... of course if you try to login 3 times and fail, your account is locked.

  106. Because by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    A lot of people don't want to live in the boondocks. Here in New York City the nearest store is next door. That place in Colorado says the nearest store is thirty minutes away, and you'd have to have a car. I don't need a car in New York....

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  107. Insurance not relevant by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    The thing is that when a bank accepts a payment instruction, it is up to them to use a secure method to verify that instruction. If the method is insecure, then you can repudiate the debit.

    Most bank machines have cameras and time stamp the videos. The banks like to use FUD to protect their systems, which tend to be quite weak, however it can be (and has been) defeated in court.

  108. msid.msn.com - permissible karma whoring by scorilo · · Score: 1

    Articles from msn.com should be posted in the thread. That's because if you have msid.msn.com blocked in your hosts file (by making it point to localhost), you cannot see msnbc.com articles. One might suggest that I could just comment it out - which is what I did to see this article - but still, a host named "msid" is not something I want my browser to go to.

    --
    "One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that ones work is terribly important." -BRussell
  109. But that's the problem, right? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    So.. how are you supposed to prove it? Witnesses? The bank is supposed to be responsible.. if the bank handed it to you, the bank has a responsibility to take it back. We need to MAKE the banks be responsible in a situation like this... so that they will develop ways to not have it happen again.

    The only solution currently is to not use ATMs

    1. Re:But that's the problem, right? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      So.. how are you supposed to prove it?

      Exactly.

      Just about the only way to prove it would be to know in advance that it was loaded with counterfeit bills and have the feds bust it open and check. You'd probably still be accused, since you knew about the bills in the first place.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  110. Brings up my favorite story by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    And it's probably just Urban Legend but..

    At a mall in Calgary, Alberta (that's Canada, eh?)
    I heard it was Shinook Center, but who knows...

    There is, of course, a bank in the mall. This bank is, of course, used by most merchants in the mall to drop off their nightly deposits.

    Some intelligent person brought a few things to the mall: A heavy cardboard box with a hole in the top, a couple of paper signs, and some tape.

    The "out of order" sign was placed on the night deposit door (you know, heavy metal thing that works like a mail drop box, but for money).

    The "Deposits here" sign was put on the cardboard box.

    Guess where lots and lots of people put bags of cash that night?

    1. Re:Brings up my favorite story by The+Patient · · Score: 1
      Chinook, actually. Named after the proud (and mighty tasty) salmon.

      Not to be confused with Schnook Center, which apparently has had its own ABM troubles.

  111. Japan by genka · · Score: 1

    Offtopic, but... When I was in Tokyo, I missed a plane, because it took me hour and a half to find an ATM compatible with my US bank card.

    1. Re:Japan by Mnemia · · Score: 1

      I found that mine worked virtually everywhere. It was a Visa one though. If your card is PLUS or Visa I think it'll work in virtually any ATM in Japan; if it's only compatible with one of the smaller ATM networks in the US then it probably won't.

  112. Free market. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    I don't believe they are required to ask for ID. In fact, Visa discourages it.. the idea is to make it as easy as possible for the customer. with a credit card, remember, you are protected form fraudulent use. IT's VISA that gets ripped off, not you. Look on your card, it even says "Property of the issuer". That's all.

    I was asked for ID when I was at a gas station buying gas. I don't look dirty or shabby. I was 27 years old. I was simply buying $30 in gas... and the little fucker behind the counter was like "Hmm. I need to see some ID." "Why?"
    "Umm... you need to show ID!"
    "why?"
    "I'm not going to run this card through without ID sir"
    "I don't have any with me" (I live 2 blocks away)
    "well pay cash then"
    "I don't have any"
    "Well I'm going to call the police!"
    "And tell them what, exactly?"
    "Umm.. okay.. nevermind"

    This was at a 7-11, in a mid-sized canadian town... not in a dodgy neighborhood, nothing like that.

    The point is.. everyone is acting like credit cards are their personal property, and that clerks and merchants are the problem.. remember it's the credit card issuers that are providing a service for us... and we need THEM to make it a service we want to use.

    Yes, clerks should check signatures more.... but that's between the merchant and Visa. Remember, the merchant is the one who doesn't get paid if the transaction was fraudulent.

  113. Good Advice For Once by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My credentials: I've worked in a bank's main Cash Vault, Research & Adjustments department, and now (finally and Praise Jesus!) IT.

    You haven't received good advice all around. The thing you should have done immediately is see the bank manager of the nearest branch and Raise Hell {TM}. It would have been best to have refused to fill out any forms that forced you to admit to being the simple owner of a counterfeit bill, but even that's not so terrible as long as you are willing to do some further social engineering yourself.

    1) You see, that ATM's bills came from a cash vault. That vault is responsible for catching counterfeits. In fact, its bill counters are SUPPOSED to catch each and every counterfeit bill fed through them. That's part of their design.

    So, by losing $20, you have just allowed the bastards in the Vault (and its governing Operations section) to continue to use machines or procedures that allow counterfeits to pass through their hands, and thus into yours.

    2) Social-engineering-wise, once a bill touches your hands, and you examine it and say "hey this is counterfeit", does that mean that the person who passed it to you can just fucking walk away scot free? Of course not. The same reasoning applies to ATMs.

    Using these two lines of reasoning, go back to that goddamned bank and get your $20 back (i.e. issue you a $20 credit). If they still balk, follow up with the Secret Service itself about your individual counterfiet bill; this can serve to embarrass the bank to honor your credit.

    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  114. Why use not your bank atm? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    Why do people insist on using cash and not just using your bank atm?

    There is no need to carry tons of cash around with you anymore. Use credit cards responsibly and you won't have any problems. I'll maybe only have 10-20 bucks on me for when I absolutely need cash, like at fast food places. But even that is going away. There is no need to carry around tons of cash anymore and don't use your debit cards.

    Secondly, I never use mall or gas station atms. They charge 1.50 and more per transaction on top of what my bank will charge. Belong to a big bank and only use the bank atms that are everywhere. Its safer and you avoid charges.

    Fraud like this can be EASILY avoided.

  115. Irony Writ Large by The+Patient · · Score: 1
    I'm reading an MSNBC story about ABM fraud, and the popup ad which is sitting on top of the story is for -- a bank.

    Whoops.

  116. Fingerprint-protected ATM cards won't work - ever by jetmarc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > It takes less than a dollar worth of materials and a matter of
    > seconds to capture a fingerprint off of... pretty much anything.

    Yes! And I care to add for the sake of completeness, because this is
    just too often (deliberately?) ignored:

    1. fingerprint-protected ATM card gets stolen
    2. thief needs sample of owners' fingerprint to produce copy
    3. ?????????? ....... bing! thief takes sample from ATM cards' surface.
    4. profit! (well, or go to jail immediately)

  117. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS "ON THE SPOKE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YUO ARE MEH BROVA

  118. You can buy credit card and ATM hardware online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A simple net search revealed this interesting site: http://www.mag-card.com

    Makes you wonder what kind of regulation could be imposed to prevent the sale of hardware to illegitimate users.

  119. Re:Be careful! ATM/MAC/Debit is *NOT* Insured! by Ravenseye · · Score: 1

    MAC/ATM/DEBIT is not fraud...it's a common exchange medium.

    The bank can't guarantee a debit transaction that is originated on the store owners network. They can only guarantee a transaction done at the ATM on their own network. Suppose good old WalMart has someone that tapped into their network and scooped the info on a debit transaction? There is no way that the bank could guarantee against it. It would be like trying to hold your ISP responsible for someone who broke your WEP encryption and used your WLAN for themselves.

    BTW....you're still covered against fraud by the switch provider...typically Visa or MasterCard against fraud....including PIN fraud on debit transactions.

    Oh...one more thing. If the retailer asks you to use a PIN, don't. Sign for your debit transaction instead (say CREDIT...but not Credit Card). Thiefs HATE to forge a signature and your sig is as good as gold when dealing with fraud.

  120. Scam the scammers!!! by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Wow, where can I find some of these?

    Just put in your card, and enter the wrong PIN. If it gives you money, just keep making "withdrawls" until the machine is empty!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  121. Minority report by rfmobile · · Score: 1

    "Hello Mr. Takamoto ..."

  122. Re:Be careful! ATM/MAC/Debit is *NOT* Insured! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    If you loose money through the ATM/Debit network you will never see it!

    Riiight. That's why the article says that "consumers are nearly always compensated by their banks."

  123. You know what? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    I knew that, too, dammit... living out of the country is making me lose my roots.
    I knew something looked wrong.

  124. Just FYI.. card types. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    There is often confusion as different things have different meanings in different places.

    In the US a "Debit Card" is usually a Visa or Mastercard, but instead of credit, it takes money out of your account directly. In Canada, these are called "Cheque cards". A "Debit Card" in Canada is an Interac card.

    A "Charge card" refers usually to the original American Express card, or other cards where you do have to pay them off, in full, at the end of the month. They are not about credit, and carrying a balance.

    A "Credit card" is about spending money you don't have.

  125. clarification by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    > There're problems with SC-s but they're
    > certainly better than magnetic strip cards.

    I agree that smartcards are light-years ahead of magnetic stripe cards.

    > I'm affraid you're DEADLY wrong. While
    > smartcards aren't perfect they're certainly cure
    > for skimming, false frontends and other
    > low-tech frauds.

    Maybe I used the word "false front" inaccurately. But an SC won't stop some of the frauds mentioned in the article.

    > SC (smartcard) has private RSA key. Once it is
    > loaded it can't be recovered. SC does all crypto
    > but only when correct PIN is entered. Enter
    > wrong PIN 10 times and SC will burn itself. Once
    > the SC signed and encrypted message for the
    > authorization server, there's no way to alter it
    > UNLESS you know private key. Sorry.

    You're right. But the real problem is that the SC has no way of checking with *you* if the amount it is signing for is correct. Both the amount and the PIN are fed to it via the ATM. A fake ATM could ask your card to authorize a withdrawal of $1000 when you only asked for a $20 withdrawal.
    It then can pocket the difference, and leave you none the wiser.

  126. Cash and Carry by coyotedata · · Score: 1

    Three years ago some folks set up convenient bank deposit sites in major shopping malls. A few days later the modern drop off boxes were gone logo and all.

    1. Re:Cash and Carry by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Something similar happens in Neil Gaiman's American Gods.

      As I recall, the con artist puts on a frumpy 'rent a cop' outfit, prints up some appropriate business cards to a nearby payphone, goes to a night-deposit slot, puts up a 'out of order' sign, and stands, shivering in the cold, with a clipboard.

      He then takes people's deposits, gives them a receipt, and looks miserable. When a cop comes by, he calls the payphone, being the number on the card, and the accomplice does an impersonation of a crufty shift boss. "Joe? Yeah, he's at so and so bank..at least, he should be! Did you find him drunk somewhere? Dammit, I told him...."

      After they get a good amount, take down the sign, and drive away.

      The methods rarely change; only the props.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Cash and Carry by coyotedata · · Score: 1

      The story in the NY Times had the group put an out of order sign on the night deposit box and place a new night deposit building in the parking lot right next to the real one. In the morning the new building was gone.

    3. Re:Cash and Carry by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Aye, and I've also read a few other versions in the comments since.

      Never underestimate the ability of humans to do obviously stupid things.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  127. Re:Be careful! ATM/MAC/Debit is *NOT* Insured! by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    I disagree. A signature is NO security at all. It isn't difficult to forge someone else's signature, especially when you've got the back of their card to practice with. You'll certainly get it good enough to pass for the owner's sig (how many people sign their name EXACTLY the same every time). A PIN is secure when you're entering it into a key pad, but not if you have to tell it to the clerk, which I have never encountered anywhere.

  128. Big Problem by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    attaching false fronts to existing ATMs

    Trojans and man-in-the-middle attacks on ATM machines.

    This should help raise public awareness of what I've long worried about.

    Everyone worries about authenticating the user to the machine (PIN numbers, biometrics), but I worry about whether what's shown to me is my authentic machine.

    It's already kind of iffy, but in a few years it will be a foregone conclusion that I cannot trust my machine when it no longer trusts me.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  129. Cash and Carry by coyotedata · · Score: 1

    If it looks like a night deposit box it must be a night deposit box.

  130. Re:Be careful! ATM/MAC/Debit is *NOT* Insured! by Ravenseye · · Score: 1

    You are absolutely right. But the courts provide for stricter penalties when a signature is forged than when a PIN is used fraudulently. Both cases are fraud, but when a signature is used, it's uttering and forgery as well. If one of our customers has their PIN used fraudulently, it's a minor felony in MA. If they forge a check or forge a credit based debit card transaction (POS), it's a major felony. Finally, if a transaction is signed for fraudulently, there is no exposure to the customer (as in the $50 rule). This last item is provided for by federal statute by the way. While the PIN is technically more secure, legal standing goes in favor of the signature (which I wish wasn't the case, but they never listen to me..).

  131. Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scat link! Do not follow!

    My eyes are burning!

  132. Re:help needed! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Do you live in the UK? Kind of doubt since you're talking about handguns here but I see the .uk email addy.
    Gotta agree w/ you about the pistols. I started out w/ a Glock 22 .40 and just bought my 2nd Kimber (a Custom CDP II). Best thing about the Glock is how easy it is to clean. Other than that, it's 1911 .45 all the way.

  133. In the United States with a Canadian Card by Noren · · Score: 1
    I was living in Canada a few years back, and went down to San Francisco to visit a friend, I used an ATM inside a fast food restaurant that had a sign saying that it charged a $2 fee for US bankcards. I used a Canadian card.(which measured balances in $CAN)

    The card worked, and I paid no fee at all. (Well, I did get a not-quite-ideal exchange rate, but not particularly bad, certainly not $2 worse than I would have received in a bank.)

  134. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS "ON THE SPOKE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How on earth did you get all those CAPS past the lameness filter?

  135. Re:STEPS IN OVERCOMING MASTURBATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Slashdot. That's not a viable alternative.