Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Zip, Language, Opportunism

Slashback tonight brings you updates and corrections from recent and ongoing stories, including (this time around) non-silver silver paste, the return of the Orkut, Mike Rowe and his not-so-epic battle with Microsoft (one last time, I hope), the future of Zip for Microsoft Windows, and more. Read on below for the details.

Funny name, well-executed idea. YourMother writes "After almost 4 days of being offline, the social network Orkut is back online. The Orkut development team has been working nonstop since bringing it down on Sunday afternoon and quite a few new security features have been implemented to protect users information. Within the first 48 hours it was up, it gained almost 100,000 users, growing many times faster than other social networks like Friendster or Tribe. Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye?"

glinden points to a story with some more information about those security holes. "From the article, 'Sources close to Google suggest widespread XSS (cross-site scripting) hacks forced the closure of the service. It isn't clear how much personal data or communication was disclosed.'"

Playmate. Playmate, playmate playmate. An anonymous reader writes "A week after an appeals court ruling revived a Playboy Enterprises Inc. trademark infringement lawsuit against Netscape Communications Inc., the companies have reached a settlement in the case (See a ZDNet report) The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. This puts an end to a closely watched case in the search engine advertising field. Several other lawsuits over misuse of trademarks in search engine ads are still in place. Google e.g. is embroiled in a lawsuit with Luis Vuitton regarding keyword-based ads in France and asked for a California court's ruling to back its trademark policy for AdWords after facing the threat of a lawsuit from American Blind & Wallpaper Factory Inc."

You have to admire such brave nomenclature. Michiel Frackers writes "Thanks for the link to my site, I got 3 gigabyte of traffic in a few hours! If I would have known, I would have written something in English. I have added an update about the Strangeberry product and its relation to Tivo at the URL you linked to.

I also included a link to my private blog (as www.frackers.com is more about my work in media & technology). Hopefully this clarifies some things for your readers, I did not intend to make this some kind of quest or game at all: it's just that I promised Arthur and his colleagues not to disclose what they are exactly doing, as you will understand."

And Anonymous joe writes with this link to an intriguing bit of Strangeberry speculation at the Register.

Nokia to port Python to Mobiles, not Perl An anonymous reader writes "Nokia was mistaken. In fact, El Reg reports that Python, not Perl, is the preferred language for scripting on its smartphone platforms. The availability of a Python implementation for mobile phones is part of a broader plan, including a JVM-based BASIC interpreter."

However, the Register article linked says that Perl is being considered, it's just that Python is being looked at as the primary language.

I wouldn't trust their pearls, either. Blade Leader writes "OCZ has issued a recall of OCZ Ultra 2 thermal paste after the Overclockers.com article on their lack of silver content. They blame the lack on their supplier, and claim they will be pursuing legal action."

A piece of history (or at least a piece of somethin' ...) Artemis writes "Searching along E-Bay and MikeRoweSoft.com I noticed that Mike Rowe has decided to sell the Microsoft Cease-and-Desist Letters and WIPO book he received on E-Bay. He is selling the WIPO book with the 25-page letter received from Microsoft's lawyers on January 14/2004.This inch-thick book contains copies of web pages, registrations, trade marks, other WIPO cases, emails between me and Microsoft's lawyers and much more. There are 27 annexes filled with information. This package also comes with the 25-page complaint transmittal coversheet that was sent with the inch-thick book."

What's wrong with gunzip, tar? whitefox writes "CNet News is reporting that PKWare & WinZip have settled their differences and will maintain Zip file compatibility for the foreseeable future with each supporting the other's security extensions. In addition, PKWare will include its SecureZip in the code it licenses to other software makers. This is good news in deed for users and developers alike!"

321 comments

  1. GOOLGE IS DYING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Everytime I search for electronics reviews or hardware reviews I get pages full of those stupid spam sites. What happened???

  2. Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So are any of you guys members yet?

    No-one I know has joined yet and I've not heard much on the net so are there really any members or is it just another conspiracy theory - ie you think it's good therefore you want to join?!?

    1. Re:Orkut by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You remind me of the Groucho Marx line (paraphrasing): "I'd never join a group that wanted me as a member."

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is why they insist upon being so cruel.

      Not a member? Join Urkut!

      Upon clicking the link, you're taken to a page where you're told to get a friend to invite you.

      That's wrong, and makes me not even INTERESTED in becoming a member of Urkut!

    3. Re:Orkut by bluewee · · Score: 1

      I know there is one or two SlashDot Members on the inside, so SHARE THE WEALTH, common there has to be lots of girls there right?

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    4. Re:Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      So are any of you guys members yet?

      No, I have real friends.

    5. Re:Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      orkut = computer geek sausage fest

    6. Re:Orkut by rjelks · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first rule of Orkut: You do not talk about Orkut.

      -

    7. Re:Orkut by generic-man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Orkut is actually just a scam designed to fleece unsuspecting Internet users out of money. The record so far is $11.00.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, you mean they didn't ask you? Ummm, we're all members already.

    9. Re:Orkut by abigor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I became a member via a guy I work with who's connected with some Silicon Valley people. I haven't actually filled anything in yet, and I don't really know what it's all about, because I've never done this social networking on the Internet thing before. Actually, I seriously doubt I'll make much use of it other than when I feel like changing jobs...I think it's probably a great job-networking tool.

      Looking over his shoulder, I noticed that many people on the service seem to be in their 30s. That seems older than the normal "let's meet on the Internet" crowd, or am I mistaken?

    10. Re:Orkut by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      I'm there and it sucks. Email me at dojothemouse@mac.com and I'll invite you. I'll need your name and email address. If I get lazy and too many people ask, I'll stop doing it.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:Orkut by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Amen. I don't want to admit to any of my real friends that I'm on it just because it's so fucking lame.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    12. Re:Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I'm too lazy for e-mail:

      Lars Haeh
      lhaeh@MAIL_THAT_IS_HOT.com

      I'll upload a movie for you or whatever if you like....

    13. Re:Orkut by Condor7 · · Score: 1



      Orkut describes itself as "an online community that connects people through a network of trusted friends".

      I don't want to socialize with that guy, or with any of his friends.

    14. Re: Orkut by lysium · · Score: 1
      No-one I know has joined yet and I've not heard much on the net so are there really any members or is it just another conspiracy theory--"

      Well Slashdot has certainly been giving it coverage. Are you sure the conspiracy you are talking about isn't betwix the editors here and Orkut? Or is all the attention just over the Google connection? Hmmm. A plot is surely afoot!

      ==============

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    15. Re:Orkut by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Orkut is not a scam, people are just using the exclusivity of it to make money. That's like saying that the "model clubs" are scams just because you'd have to tip the bouncer to get in.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    16. Re:Orkut by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I'm 40 and I 'meet on the internet'. Or maybe it just that I'm wierd... Oh yeah, thats it. Sorry to bother you all....

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    17. Re:Orkut by fufighter · · Score: 1

      I would have said the samething... but I'm too passive...

    18. Re:Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm on orkut, my friend is a developer at Google and he invited me. There is nothing special about that thing, it's just like friendster or tens of other similar networks.

  3. Zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dupe. That's been done. I still don't know how to copy a zip file created by WinXP to a floppy disk. Any ideas? Trust Microsoft to screw it up.

    1. Re:Zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      right click, send to -> 3 1/2 floppy A:

      not that hard. no really - its quite easy!

    2. Re:Zip by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      XP's zipping isn't good. Download 7-zip instead. Totally free, no fancy crap, and works great for all kinds of archives. You'll thank me later.

    3. Re:Zip by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Download 7-zip instead. Totally free, no fancy crap, and works great for all kinds of archives.

      I'll second this. Since I started using it, 7z has become my archival tool of choice. Even for creating plain old .zip files, it gets around 10% better compression than anything else out there. And for it own .7z format, you can easily get 33% better, and I've seen more than 10 times better (7z includes solid archive support, one of the features people rave about in RARs (ick!), which for packing a collection of similar files in the same archive, means all of them after the first compress to almost nothing).


      And, 7z exists as open source! Can't go wrong with that (unless you work for SCO).


      One complaint, though, its GUI really sucks (or at least the last time I reinstalled it did, I haven't checked for a new one in a while). They need to make it behave more like the standard Windows Explorer view (not that I think the world of Windows Explorer, but on a 'doze system, for the most part you can count on "things having to do with files" behaving like it, by default)... Just the standard drag-n-drop behavior would make it 10x easier. But, I use it mostly from the command line anyway (Try doing that with WinZip), so the GUI doesn't bother me all that much.

    4. Re:Zip by stephenisu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just a public sevice announcement,
      by going to http://www.winzip.com/wzcline.htm you can add command line support to WINZip.

      Not trying to to be a jerk, just wanting to inform people who need to use it (Corporate policies... ewww)

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    5. Re:Zip by allaryin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sigh... 7z... I seem to recall having spent no less than two hours trying to decompress one of those on a unix box.

      Apparently it works through wine, but nobody's thought enough of the format to actually port it, despite the windows code being open.

      --
      Ammon Lauritzen http://simud.org/
    6. Re:Zip by westlake · · Score: 1
      I use it mostly from the command line anyway (Try doing that with WinZip)

      WinZip Command Line Support

    7. Re:Zip by pla · · Score: 1

      Not trying to to be a jerk, just wanting to inform people who need to use it

      Not at all! Thank you for that link.

      Although I personally have switched to 7z for almost everything, having more tools available for scripting never hurts. And as you mention, in case of a corporate policy restricting people to WZ, those command-line tools may seem like a blessing (I know I would have loved them at my previous job).

    8. Re:Zip by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

      Try "copy file.zip a:" in a CMD box works very well

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
    9. Re:Zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... 7z... I seem to recall having spent no less than two hours trying to decompress one of those on a unix box.

      Yeah, that's the one problem with that format... iirc the compressor is written with bits of the MFC framework, so it's Windows only.

      I think someone was going to try porting it, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

    10. Re:Zip by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      My favorite is Freezip. It does very little actually, but it will completely decompress archives with only a double click (in Windows). That's very nice because 99% of the time that's what I want, and I don't have to touch any silly GUI interface.

      I'll check out your link though, because I do need extra features occasionally. Thanks

    11. Re:Zip by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      the Graphical front end is, but isn't the console version fairly portable, just need someone to bother with the port, most of the time i don't use 7z unless i know i'm sharing files with people working on a win32 platform, i normally just stick with tar and bzip2.

    12. Re:Zip by cscx · · Score: 4, Funny

      I still don't know how to copy a zip file created by WinXP to a floppy disk. Any ideas? Trust Microsoft to screw it up

      Yes, take your computer, unplug it, place it back into the box it was delivered in, and ship it back to the factory.

    13. Re:Zip by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      I still don't know how to copy a zip file created by WinXP to a floppy disk. Any ideas?

      Take your brain, unplug it, place it back into the box it was delivered in, and ship it back to the factory.

    14. Re:Zip by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Never mind about 7z format. 7-zip supports RAR. Decompresses, at least, not sure about compressing but I guess it does that too. And since I didn't see any odd clauses about foreign DLLs there, I'm assuming it's 100% GPLed homegrown code. I didn't check the source code to verify though. But the point is, there's an open-source RAR implementation sitting around here, and it won't run on *NIXes! Imagine the silliness of GNOME File Roller requiring shareware to compress or decompress RARs (it won't work with just the freeware unrar(1), it also needs shareware rar(1))...

      Just took a little glance at the 7-zip source code. I'm not a Windows guru, but it smells like MFC??? Errrgh.... Visual Studio stuff. For once I wish they'd port this stuff to C#, at least it'd have a chance to work in Mono =)

    15. Re:Zip by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      I would be glad to help! For a low fee of US$1.00 per file, you may e-mail me the file and I will send you a zip file with your file in it! Aren't I nice?

      Send your file to not@clue.com

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  4. The Zip Rip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    PKWare deserves whatever bad happens to it. I remember when there was one standard compression: "arc". "PK" got caught pirating and selling the "arc" code, and rather than rectify matters, they created a perversely incompatible standard instead.

    1. Re:The Zip Rip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Oh look, how cute. A bitter old SEA employee.

      And now for the truth: the .zip format wasn't "perversely incompatable." It was intentionally different from .arc because SEA didn't like PKWare making interoperable software. So PK made .zip and released the specs and declared that it's ok if anyone wants to be compatable.

    2. Re:The Zip Rip by AwesomeJT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Up yours! SEA sued the hell out of PK because he made a superiour ARC program that actually worked. The folks at SEA didn't like that because they were losing customers. Not much competitions when you compare pricey crap to cheap stuff that works. Of course, PK had to settle b/c he was a small fry at that time and didn't have any money for legal fees. He was banned from making software that was compatible with ARC. SEA also won the source code that PK had developed -- gosh I wonder why? So, after a little bit, PK came out with the now famous PKZIP. He released it. Since he was banned from writting ARC compatible software, someone else wrote a nice utility to convert ARC to ZIP. For some reason, almost overnight, entire BBSes (pre-Internet days) were converted to ZIP. Nowadays, SEA and ARC are only footnotes in the annuals of computing history. Long forgotten and relatively unknown by today's Internet generation. The story almost feels like our SCO vs Linux issue of today. Historical Deja Vu.

      --
      SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
    3. Re:The Zip Rip by XO · · Score: 1

      Phil Katz was a complete and total ASSHAT too, and I think he deserved his massively drunken depressed death last year or the year before..

      And you are entirely wrong about the lawsuit. From this link, you can find out lots of great information. Basically, SEA had released the source code, but required their permission to use it for any purpose beyond study. Phil took their source code, modified it, and then re-sold it for $1.50 less than what SEA did. SEA offered Phil an unlimited use license of SEA's code, if Phil would withdraw from offering to the BUSINESS market. (SEA and Phil Katz used to command fees of thousands of dollars per copy of the software.. I think I have copies of the ads at home from the early 80's)

      Your views are totally distorted by what you heard in your 133t bbs days.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    4. Re:The Zip Rip by AwesomeJT · · Score: 1

      I personally won't go around saying that Phil deserved to die -- regardless of his actions with SEA. Even if he was fully at fault (which I don't believe was the case). After all, he is the creator of the most popular compression format in use (ZIP). So what if he was legally forced to make a format different and completely incompatible with ARC? Zip is so much better, and available for free. I'm not sure Phil copied the code becaue his stuff *actually worked*. Actually what happened, is SEA took (by legal force) Phil's code and evetually released it as their own. You can find a lot of good, valid, non-conspiracy-theory-like, information on the web to backup this point. One or two websites that contradict the masses of other websites don't add up to much in my book. Just because it is on the web doesn't mean it is right. I can find websites claiming that Hilter or Stalin were the good guys -- don't mean it was so. I'm sure this issue isn't as black and white as we make it sound. I'm sure that Phil did *something* wrong -- I just don't believe the BS hype that SEA said about Phil. Of course, this is one thing I like about the Internet (and BBSes of early days), you can tell your side of the story.

      --
      SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
    5. Re:The Zip Rip by XO · · Score: 1

      Right, I didn't mean that. But being the drug and alcohol addicted asshat that he was...

      The popular view of what happened is skewed by the BBS community having considered Phil some kind of Hero, making the better software. But, he DID use their code, that was NOT public domain to use. At least, that's what the case determined, and I'm not going to argue with a judicial decision.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    6. Re:The Zip Rip by AwesomeJT · · Score: 1
      Well, I would agree that doing drugs was an extremely poor decision. Not surprised it eventually claimed his life -- since many drugs ultimately do this.

      As far the legal issues, Phil had to settle out of court so we won't ever really know that the courts would have ruled in the end. It could have been a landmark case -- like so many software-patent related cases. Unfortunately, a lot of time in the American justice system, it isn't if you are right or wrong -- it's how well funded your lawyers are. I do tend to question the judicial system for that reason. For example: if you were a minority accused of a crime about 50 years ago in just about any State in the Southeastern USA (or most states in the US) -- I doubt you got a fair trial. Even if you were at fault, I doubt you got a fair sentence. Software patents/copywrites are also very subjective and easily swayed by money. I can name several such cases currently going on -- especially with the DMCA in force.

      I'm sure if you went back in history, you would be appauled what was considered the "right" decision of the courts in many cases. Since Phil never really had much ability to defend himself, there's not much we can do but speculate either way.

      It seems like it's courtroom victors that end up (re)writing the history books.

      --
      SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
  5. Please?! by bluewee · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will someone invite me...?

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    1. Re:Please?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and me? Who do you have to screw in Google to get invited?

    2. Re:Please?! by xoran99 · · Score: 0

      I'm forming my own Friendster-type service. I'll call mine Society. All you have to do to join is GET OFF YOUR BUTT AND GO TALK TO SOMEONE. :P

      --

      Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

    3. Re:Please?! by Raven15 · · Score: 1

      What's the URL to join?

    4. Re:Please?! by xoran99 · · Score: 0

      Send me $5, and you get a certificate, instructions, and a collectible "I am a sucker" badge that all your friends will be jealous of.

      --

      Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

  6. Slow week then. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What about this new type of matter? That's interesting.

    1. Re:Slow week then. by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      H2G2?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Slow week then. by nexex · · Score: 1
      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    3. Re:Slow week then. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      OK, sorry. Thanks for pointing that out.

  7. No Stranegberry content in Anonymous Joe's link by winkydink · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice write-up on Netflix, but nothing really earth-shattering there either.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:No Stranegberry content in Anonymous Joe's link by Indomitus · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the whole article you'll see the stuff about Tivo at the end. Seeing as Strangeberry was about 'broadband content delivery' it's not too much of a stretch to see Tivo team up with Netflix to allow Tivo users to download movies using Strangeberry tech. They didn't mention Strangeberry specifically in the article but the Tivo-Netflix connection is there and Strangeberry could be the tools to make it happen.

  8. What about infozip? by phr1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will the new "secure" zip format be published so other implementations can use it? There's the old pkzip "password" feature that infozip implments, that's deliberately weak because of the old export controls, but that doesn't count.

    1. Re:What about infozip? by mark_space2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If it isn't, we should come up with one.

      De-facto standards and proprietary standards get started becuase no one has an alternative. If an open standard is created, I'm sure users and the market will prefer that one.

      The best time to make such an open standard is before any proprietary one has a chance to get a strong foot hold.

    2. Re:What about infozip? by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 4, Informative
      There's actually 2 encrypted .ZIP formats: the announcement is just that PKZIP will read WinZip's format, and vice-versa.

      WinZip's AES encryption is documented here. PKWare's format is apparently proprietary.

    3. Re:What about infozip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PKWare specs seem to be here.

    4. Re:What about infozip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's been a documented open standard for encrypted archives for a long time -- it's called PGP.

    5. Re:What about infozip? by phr1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. The winzip format is reasonably well done, though the authentication format is unspecified (the doc says "look at the implementation tips" and the implementation tips say "look at the doc") but is done by Brian Gladman's published AES library, so can be deduced from that. I see one minor problem, that for AES-128 the key is computed by crunching the password with a 64-bit salt. Because of the birthday paradox there starts to be significant chance of re-using a key after encrypting a billion or so files, which isn't implausible in some types of automated systems. Since the encryption mode is AES-CTR, re-using a key is a serious security failure. The solution is use AES-256 which is also provided and which uses a 128 bit salt. I don't understand why they used separate salt sizes for the two key sizes.

    6. Re:What about infozip? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --What I'm worried about is the Zip that is used on Linux (and possibly other) boxes. I sent an email to the developers almost A YEAR AGO cmoplaining about the still-extant 2GB filesize problem, and AOTW they still have done NOTHING about it!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    7. Re:What about infozip? by kwalker · · Score: 1

      De-facto standards and proprietary standards get started becuase no one has an alternative. If an open standard is created, I'm sure users and the market will prefer that one.

      You mean like Ogg/Vorbis?

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
  9. So who seeds Orkut by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation about a meeting-place where membership is by invitation (can't you tell I'm not one of the exalted :-)

    It would be interesting to see what the demographic of the initial seed population was - and to see whether that influenced the community over time... As any fule know, the initial conditions can have a profound impact on any time-dependent phenomena :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:So who seeds Orkut by MatthewB79 · · Score: 1

      They probably select a demographic that would cling to the novelty of it. If your not a clique-type socialite who values an online tool to "create a closer and more intimate network of friends" then I guess Orkut isn't interested in you. Alternately, you probably aren't interested in it.

    2. Re:So who seeds Orkut by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I know...I should read the article...or maybe other posts about this, but isn't this kind of like the "white lists" I have in my IM's?

      --
      What?
    3. Re:So who seeds Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, given the invitation-only nature, wouldn't it be possible to totally tear the friendship network apart once you get invited.? I mean assuming you're invited by email and you can invite as many users as you want. It wouldn't be "trusted" for very long unless people are held liable for damages if the lose thier password or give it away.

    4. Re:So who seeds Orkut by back_pages · · Score: 1
      It's an interesting question. I'd put my dollah on the hypothesis that the clique gravitates toward a more mainstream population as time goes on. I mean, everytime someone invites somebody that isn't 100% part of the clique, he probably starts a pyramid scheme of inviting people who are more general public and less elite.

      But hey, I could be wrong. That's where my money is, though. Anyway, somebody invite me. I want to share my bad ass music interests and engage in enlightened conversations with.. uh.. internet people. *smacks irc* DOWN BOY!

    5. Re:So who seeds Orkut by dracvl · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a member (big deal, right ;), and the definite majority is computer and tech people, but most of them seem to have good social connections too. So no surprise there.

    6. Re:So who seeds Orkut by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      Do we not already have enough ways to communicate with people via the internet?

      I mean, if Google is netting millions in their shiney new method, kudos. The FOAF-factor going on here is interesting, but I'm guessing this is going to be a wash-out into simple oblivion any day now, because FOAFs are interesting "Oh, you know monkeyspanker as well!?" but it doesn't carry that far.

      If people are open to meeting online, then personals, chat, IRC, blogs, BBS's, Listservs, meetups, clans, MMPORGs, user groups, and the myriads of marketing based events (conventions, openings, book signings, political events) are already a enough? NO! We must also jump into this! well, there's plenty of chatheads to partition into little camps, so away it goes...

      Holy cow, so now can I connect my Friendster people to my Orkut people? OH no! Bleed over! Suddenly, we've mapped a lot of spurious relationships. A buddy told me to sign into Friendster, so I did. I wrote a pithy opinion and never went back. At a certain point, it's akin to organizing your photos over and over.

    7. Re:So who seeds Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation about a meeting-place where membership is by invitation

      Ha! That's what they said about the vast right wing conspiracy, and look how it's grown!


      Hoping nobody mods me "insightful"...

    8. Re:So who seeds Orkut by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... As any fule know, the initial conditions can have a profound impact on any time-dependent phenomena :-)

      I was once solicited, directly from the salesfloor of my then employer ( my customer was a sales manager who I impressed), to work in sales for a major international insurance agency.

      Upon the formal application I was turned down for employment (thank God).

      Why? Because I'm not a joiner. I didn't belong to fraternity, Elks Lodge, Country Club, The Rotary, what have you.

      Thus I didn't have, in their eyes, a ready pool of people the "invite' to purchase insurance. My abilites and professionalism as a salesman were completely irellevant to them.

      Does that shed any light on your curiosity?

      KFG

    9. Re:So who seeds Orkut by XO · · Score: 1

      I invited about 30 people to my initial friendster account. Five days later, I had 15,000+ people in my connections. Somewhere about 11 people away from me, and all the way across the continent, I found a girl that I had dated in high school, who knew someone who was a very close friend of mine (that i didn't meet until 5 years after high school, on the other side of the state). She's planning on coming by and hanging out for a few days in March. Should be interesting. :)

      That's the only thing I've actually done with Friendster. Oh, one person found me from high school with it, but I didn't particularly want to be found by them. lol.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    10. Re:So who seeds Orkut by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Orkut sucks. Well. I'm there, and I have 1 friend. When I joined friendster, I had 25 friends waiting for me.

      Want an invite? Email me at dojothemouse@mac.com

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:So who seeds Orkut by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In most any circumstance, anyone with an association in good standing with an employer has an almost infinite advantage over anyone else, even if on paper they are much much much less apparently qualified. I know, this just agrees with your point, and I too have been pissed off by this phenomenon, but I have to admit, there is sound reasoning behind it.

      The major problem with hiring people is that it is typically a long term investment with a good deal of commitment on the part of the employer. For obvious reasons, there is an extreme benefit in determining the qualifications of a candidate before hiring. Despite all best efforts in interviews and resumes, it really isn't possible to gauge a candidate very accurately except to weed out the most incompetent. Even if someone isn't up to par, they can fake it in an interview long enough to look better than another candidate that just can't deliver a good sales pitch at interview time. Social networking provides the applicant credibility, and provides the employer better accountability ('Jim recommended him, so Jim has ultimate responsibility').

      Of course, further benefits include lower startup time for a new employee and, over time, increased morale and teamwork, the foundation of which was already partially built off of company time before even the first day. Someone coming into work with a few familiar faces will tend to hit the ground running better, being less timid about getting starting advice and knowing a comfortable person to ask about things as they start running. Even without asking questions, the closer contact allows the existing employ to detect problems long before they would have been seen with a stranger.

      So yes, to those without the networks, it is really unfair, and it is unfair when you build a really nice social network only to have it shattered by a site shutdown (both have been my situation), but it does increase candidate review reliability overall and increase net productivity.

      All that said, I think this should go out the window in the sales/marketing world. The best evaluation is the pitch they throw for themselves in a short term. If a guy can sell you on taking him for a job over other candidates, I can't imagine a better qualification for that line of work...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    12. Re:So who seeds Orkut by kfg · · Score: 1

      What intrigued me in particular, since I was already in the field and came to their attention because of that ( I wasn't simply a resume sitting on a desk, I was asked to apply because the sales manager had already been on the receiving end of my pitch in a real world situation), was that nobody ever bothered to ask me how thick my prospect book was.

      I filled out a form detailing my private social contacts (from their point of view none) and told to go home. Period.

      The Orkut seed group was surely chosen in like manner. Not to keep the place exclusive, but because they were known joiners who would invite a lot of people, and those people would also likely be the sort begging to be let in.

      KFG

    13. Re:So who seeds Orkut by XO · · Score: 1

      I want to be invited too :(

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  10. Re:Disregard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we're meant to disregard the message, how can we mod you up, because we won't read your message because of the "please disregard this message" message?

    no im confused!

    HEEEEEEEEEELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  11. Translation by bluewee · · Score: 0

    Did anyone ever Translate the guys site about the Strangeberry?

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    1. Re:Translation by bluedream · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother to click the link above and reread his blog? Guess not

      --
      savethedollhouse.com
    2. Re:Translation by bluewee · · Score: 1

      Read the Artical... FUCK NO!

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
  12. Selling legal documents? by NineNine · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Doesn't he need those for something???

    1. Re:Selling legal documents? by Kilka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Had you read the post you would have noticed that he's got two copies, one of which he is keeping for himself.

      -Kilka

      --
      If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Selling legal documents? by misspelled · · Score: 1

      Now at $10,000 USD. No, sorry; $10,100. Who's bidding, anyway? Bill Gates? Looks like Mike Rowe's going to get his 10 G's after all.

  13. Am I the only one... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...who associates the name "Orkut" with the Hanna-Barbera Smurfs ripoff, "The Snorks"? ...I loved that show.

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by msmikkol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've never heard of "The Snorks", but I find the name "Orkut" quite funny. It is the plural of "orgasm" in Finnish.

      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
  14. Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by Nakito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read the description of Mike Rowe's auction on Ebay. He says that he is auctioning "the WIPO book with the 25-page letter I received from Microsoft's lawyers on January 14/2004," but then says, "I have two copies of these and I will be keeping one for my own personal memoirs." So -- is the subject of the auction a true original? Did Microsoft serve a duplicate set of originals on the same guy? Or is he just selling a copy that he made? If I bought that letter, I would want to see blue ink on the signature line.

    1. Re:Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      Well it's currently on $3751, so I hope he's not selling a copy! Otherwise there's gonna be one pissed off eBayer sending Mike Rowe some legal documents of his own!

    2. Re:Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wouldn't count on a signature. That's the original Jan 14th agreement MS sent him--one copy for him, one for them perhaps? He didn't sign it, and then MS offered to throw in an Xbox, the trip, MSCE course, etc. (I wonder if the text of the agreement he did sign has or will be made public?)

      If the bidding doubles a couple times, he'll be making more than the $10,000 he wanted in the first place. Hmm, maybe in 30 years, he'll buy them?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by Nakito · · Score: 1

      one copy for him, one for them perhaps?

      That's a good thought and it had not occured to me. It could be an interesting insight into Microsoft's approach to perceived violations: maybe they always send two sets of proposed settlement papers right off the bat, and if you cave in, then you just sign one set and send it right back, and keep the other set for yourself. Since he ultimately reached another agreement, he would indeed have two duplicate original sets if that is the case.

    4. Re:Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by KhanAFur · · Score: 1

      It is over $10,000 right now and the first thing I thought is "Wow he got the $10,000 he wanted"

      -Mary

    5. Re:Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by Planx_Constant · · Score: 1

      If you want a C&D letter from Microsoft, you can get one for the cost of a domain registration, if you want. www.myghkrosopht.com

      --
      Heisenberg might have been here.
    6. Re:Is a "copy" the same as a "duplicate original"? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have thought of putting the offered contract on eBay. He managed the 4. Profit! part without taking Microsoft's bloodmoney, risking court or looking like a chump. Perhaps the eBay money was luck, perhaps not, but I don't think we've heard the last of this Mike Rowe. :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  15. Zip is old school by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

    I am sorry but zip is one of those things that has been around too long. Ace, rar, bzip2... now that's what M$ should support straight out of the box.

    1. Re:Zip is old school by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Hey kid. "Old school" is good. It means "it works." Generally, it's not a good idea to fix what's not broken.

    2. Re:Zip is old school by gkuz · · Score: 1

      ZIP is free. RAR isn't. Big difference.

    3. Re:Zip is old school by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      but RAR is Free*

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Zip is old school by redhat421 · · Score: 1
      Well I would definitely agree that ZIP works, I would also say that gzip, and bzip are used all the time and also work. On top of that rar, gzip, and bzip achieve better compression ratios.

      But what I really find interesting is where the line is on bundling software. I use OSS on my desktop, but I see that Microsoft is going to start bundling a compression program. This seems like a utility that belongs in the base system. But a media player, which also seems to make sense, should not be bundled.

      Oh well.

    5. Re:Zip is old school by DraconPern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You forgot LHA.

    6. Re:Zip is old school by molafson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am sorry but zip is one of those things that has been around too long. Ace, rar, bzip2...

      Argh, ACE was the worst! Simply because there was no need for it. RAR already existed to distribute multipart binaries (i.e. warez). But for a while it was the case that any warez you would download would consist of ZIP files inside RAR files inside ACE files. WTF?

      These days I prefer Apple's DMG.

    7. Re:Zip is old school by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used LHArc for at least a few years straight during the BBS days, back prior to Info-Zip's Zip/UnZip programs.

      I imagine that someone still has a working version of it, although I've long since convered everything to ZIP for doing archives. (Might switch to BZip2, might not...)

      Frankly, the "secure archive" in PkZip/WinZip is usless to me because I'd rather use an open-source tool like GPG to encrypt.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    8. Re:Zip is old school by value_added · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe M$ has supported anything natively but its own .CAB format.

      There was, however, the ZIP support that was added to XP, but that support seemed (at least to me) limited.

    9. Re:Zip is old school by tepples · · Score: 1

      Under what license?

    10. Re:Zip is old school by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it's free as in warez

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:Zip is old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true.

    12. Re:Zip is old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always found it hard to believe that the green dinosaur from the Super Mario Brothers games wrote that program!

      (C) Yoshi, 1991

    13. Re:Zip is old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Someone correct me if I'm wrong

      You're wrong. :-) In Windows XP, right click on a ZIP file and one of the menu items is "explore". It is just like opening a directory. Very convenient.

      Well, except for the fact that, under the hood, it's nothing at all like opening a directory -- even though it could be exactly like it if they created a virtual filesystem type for ZIP files -- because it's just an explorer shell trick. For instance, you can browse, and you can double-click on files, but you can't for example install a .PRC from a ZIP file onto your Palm handheld device this way. It looks like a regular file, smells like a regular file, and tastes like a regular file, except you can't use it just like a regular file. Although, if you explore a ZIP file this way and then drag the .PRC out of the ZIP file onto your desktop, then you can install it. Intuitive, huh?

      Oh, and also the performance sucks -- if you put a 1 gigabyte ZIP file on your desktop and the right click explore on it, not only does it take a while for that window to open, but the entire explorer shell and pretty much the whole machine is hosed for several minutes while it thrashes around wildly. Just so you can see what's in the ZIP file, and ZIP files don't even require you to uncompress anything to read their table of contents.

      Oh well, I guess this is how you know that it really is Microsoft native support for the ZIP format.

    14. Re:Zip is old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZIP is old school, and you can do much better these days. ZIP is still pretty good in the speed department, but you can get better compression ratios these days. LOTS better. For instance, check out 7-Zip. It's free software, it works, and its compression format has nearly twice the compression ratio of ZIP. And, by the way, it can create ZIP files in the ZIP format that have better compression than other ZIP programs get. And 7-Zip isn't even the best compression out there.

    15. Re:Zip is old school by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I think that zip was handled by ME as well via compressed folders.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    16. Re:Zip is old school by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I had never heard of LHA until recently, when my GF started writing "dollz." Gnome KISS is a KISS doll viewer, and they are all the rage in Asia (or were last year, anyway). KISS is like paper dolls that you dress up. You can see some of my GFs work at the bottom of this page. There are actually some fairly sexy ones, but I can't find any on a quick google. Anyway, these dollz sets use LHA compression, and finding a copy that would even compile on my machine took days, and sometimes things still don't work correctly. LHA is a PITA for me. P.S. A javascript version of a doll is here.

    17. Re:Zip is old school by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1

      That was one of the worst surprises I had when I got an XP machine. XP treats a zip archive like a directory. Even over a network !! Really nasty if you are like me and have say lots of old web sites or source trees in zip files as sort of semi dead storage. Why anyone would want this feature is lost on me. Sort of like having someone clean your apartment by emptying your closets and drawers on the floor in a heap so that it is "Easier to find!"

      For what it's worth, this will kill that "feature" in XP.

      1. Select Run from the Start menu and enter
      regsvr32 /u %windir%\system32\zipfldr.dll
      2. Click OK.
      3. Restart the computer.

      To un-kill XP's zip support:

      1. Select Run from the Start menu and enter
      regsvr32 %windir%\system32\zipfldr.dll
      2. Click OK.
      3. Restart the computer.

      This originated with someone named "Larry" and forwarded to me, I don't know who "Larry" is.

    18. Re:Zip is old school by Doomdark · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Too bad there didn't seem to be much info about compression itself. Is that proprietary, or perhaps documented somewhere (white paper)? And comparisons didn't seem to include bzip2 results which would have been interesting (since that's an open standard, although not with that many implementations).

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    19. Re:Zip is old school by Nef · · Score: 1

      LHA wasn't the only out there compression standard I picked up, and still have, in my BBS days.

      Here's a quick dir *.exe on E:\compression :

      11/11/1998 12:47 PM 203,781 ace2.exe
      11/22/1998 08:44 PM 185,344 ACE32.EXE
      03/13/1989 10:30 AM 65,339 ARC.EXE
      10/03/1999 08:38 AM 138,538 arc602.exe
      07/20/1993 03:48 PM 115,808 ARJ.EXE
      07/22/1993 12:08 AM 223,856 arj241a.exe
      10/03/1999 08:38 AM 351,938 arj260x.exe
      08/19/1993 09:53 AM 39,910 GZIP.EXE
      08/19/1993 09:52 AM 121,868 GZIP386.EXE
      09/26/2002 12:20 PM 1,112,356 Jzip - setup.exe
      11/24/1992 02:55 AM 35,924 LHA.EXE
      11/24/1992 05:55 AM 70,656 lha255b.exe
      11/24/1992 02:55 AM 35,762 LHA_E.EXE
      03/06/1989 01:14 PM 18,831 MKSARC.EXE
      02/01/1993 02:04 AM 29,378 PKUNZIP.EXE
      02/01/1993 02:04 AM 42,166 PKZIP.EXE
      02/01/1993 02:04 AM 7,687 PKZIPFIX.EXE
      05/08/1996 01:21 AM 102,989 RAR.EXE
      10/03/1999 08:38 AM 267,248 rar200.exe
      04/21/1996 03:07 PM 18,574 RCVT.EXE
      07/20/1993 03:48 PM 36,214 REARJ.EXE
      07/20/1993 03:48 PM 9,998 REGISTER.EXE
      04/20/1996 12:53 PM 31,906 UnRAR.exe
      08/19/2002 05:41 AM 1,803,848 winzip81.exe
      02/01/1993 02:04 AM 27,319 ZIP2EXE.EXE
      10/03/1999 08:38 AM 55,721 zoo210.exe
      26 File(s) 5,152,959 bytes
      0 Dir(s) 80,748,052,480 bytes free

      I'm pretty sure that somewhere I have an old copy of ICE Unpacker from my Doom .wad hacking which had it's own proprietary .ice format as well.

    20. Re:Zip is old school by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      LHA wasn't the only out there compression standard I picked up, and still have, in my BBS days.

      Here's a quick dir *.exe on E:\compression :
      [snip: 26 decompression programs]


      You're my hero!

      Even back in the slow-downloading BBS days, you were ready to uncompress any porno that came your way!

      Forget Al Gore! It's visionaries like you who created teh IntarWeb!

    21. Re:Zip is old school by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      For instance, you can browse, and you can double-click on files, but you can't for example install a .PRC from a ZIP file onto your Palm handheld device this way. It looks like a regular file, smells like a regular file, and tastes like a regular file, except you can't use it just like a regular file. Although, if you explore a ZIP file this way and then drag the .PRC out of the ZIP file onto your desktop, then you can install it. Intuitive, huh?

      PowerDesk can do exactly what you want: zip files (to arbitrary recursion depths) are treated as directories with drag and drag and so forth implemented as unseen temporary files.

      If I recall correctly, however, it does have some of the performance problems you mention.

      Still, it works pretty well, but I no longer use it because it looks ugly and I find PowerDesk's splash screen too annoying.

  16. High ebay bid by digital+bath · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wow. The highest bid on the cease and desist letter is currently $3,751.00. Not bad.

    --
    find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    1. Re:High ebay bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put anything up for sale on eBay and announce it on Slashdot, and be sure to see a lot of idiots bidding, not really sure what they'll use it for.

      I suppose, based on the extreme current bid, this item qualifies in my group of weird things I found on eBay. Among other items, there are: Absolutely nothing (at five bucks), a string tossed into a tree and left for ten years (twenty bucks), a nickle, ...

      eBay does really attract the nuts with too much money on their hand and no hobby - all we need now is guard dogs and a bunch of officers to take them down once they reveal themselves.

    2. Re:High ebay bid by bluewee · · Score: 1

      1. Post ebay auction on SlashDot
      2. ....
      3. PROFIT!!!!

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    3. Re:High ebay bid by toogreen · · Score: 1

      For that price It must be Microsoft bidding on it as they don't want it to fall into anyone's hands :P

  17. The best Zip on Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is 7-Zip.

  18. thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's wrong with gunzip, tar?

    Have you ever tried to extract a single file from a gzip'ed tar archive? It's not possible without unpacking everything and throwing away the bits that you don't want.

    Nokia to port Python to Mobiles, not Perl

    Yay! This makes *much* more sense. Python rocks and is perfectly suited for portable devices on small devices, hence the successful PalmOS port.

    Orkut - Funny name, well-executed idea.

    Urm.. it's been a very badly executed idea if they've had to shut it down already because of hacking. Then there are the disgruntled reports from users that think it's completely pointless. It's only popular because Google is - they could have sneezed and everybody would have noticed.

    1. Re:thoughts by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

      have you ever tried to extract a single file from a gzip'ed tar archive? It's not possible without unpacking everything and throwing away the bits that you don't want.

      tar -xzf tarfile.tgz path/to/thefileyouwant

    2. Re:thoughts by random_static · · Score: 2, Informative
      tar -xzf tarfile.tgz path/to/thefileyouwant

      that does unpack everything only to throw away all but the file you wanted, though. try unpacking only the middle-most file in the kernel source tarball, see how long it takes.

      of course, zip has to put up with (very marginally) worse compression because each file is compressed individually to solve this problem. also, tarballs can be treated as streams since all the metadata is interleaved in with the files - a zip has all the directory data in dedicated portions of the file, which means you might have to seek backwards in certain situations. that, of course, is not always possible in some of the situations where a tarball will still work for ya.

    3. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is a VERY well executed idea. They got so many things right that Friendster stumbles over.

      The security issues are a seperate matter - they're not suprising though. After I found that I'm 4 degrees of seperation away from Orkut (the person, not the service) I was suprised to find his home address openly available in his profile. Sounds like a very open kind of guy created a very open service.

    4. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want that behaviour, gzip all the files you want to put in the tar and THEN pack them. :P

    5. Re:thoughts by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Informative


      that does unpack everything only to throw away all but the file you wanted,

      Well, actually it only unpacks the stuff that comes before the file in the archive. If the file in question is near the top, most of the archive is not unpacked.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    6. Re:thoughts by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

      Yay! This makes *much* more sense. Python rocks and is perfectly suited for portable devices on small devices, hence the successful PalmOS port.

      Why exactly is python "perfectly suited" for portable devices? I recently stopped running gDesklets on my desktop because the python interpreter consumed somewhere between 22-26MB of ram and a constant 15% of CPU cycles just for the one app... Granted the CPU number is a bit misleading b/c it's a pII 400, but you aren't going to get a whole lot more horsepower than that on a portable device.

      So long story short, if thats typical of python apps I'd say they're terribly suited for small devices.

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    7. Re:thoughts by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Have you ever tried to extract a single file from a gzip'ed tar archive? It's not possible without unpacking everything and throwing away the bits that you don't want.
      Sorry, but that's true of almost every compressor that gets a better ratio than zip. I used to use RAR, now I use 7z. They both create "solid" archives by sorting the files into an order most likely to place similar sections together then compress the whole thing as a single stream of data. Makes a huge difference to compression.
    8. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAR = warez-kiddie-I'm-so-cool crap. That's the only place you'll find rar files in use. And why? It isn't worth the extra hassle just to save 3k of space on a 30 megabyte archive.

    9. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but that's true of almost every compressor that gets a better ratio than zip.

      Why should we care about "almost every compressor that gets a better ratio than zip"? Maybe zip is good enough for some of us?

    10. Re:thoughts by lewiscr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, no. tar (Tape ARchiver) would still have to process all the crap in front to find the gzipped file.

      tar made the assumption that it was sending/receiving it's data from a sequential access device, not a random access one. This assumption heavily influenced the file format. So even on a random access device, it still has to slog through the preceeding data to get what it wants. But it has some nice advantages for data recovery. If you lose half the tape, you can still get the files back on the part you have. It doesn't matter if you only have the first half, the last half, or the middle half. As long as the complete file exist on a piece of tape you have, you can get that file back.

      Because of this, tar won't even exit early if you only want one file and it's at the beginning of the archive.

      Watch:
      crlewis@localhost % time tar tvf test1.tar
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 439 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.cfg.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 14735 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.log.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 1006 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.nvram.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 342346881 2004-01-13 14:09:11 win2000Serv.vmdk.bz2
      0.080u 2.280s 0:13.95 16.9% 0+0k 0+0io 191pf+0w

      crlewis@localhost % time tar tvf test2.tar
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 342346881 2004-01-13 14:09:11 win2000Serv.vmdk.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 439 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.cfg.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 14735 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.log.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 1006 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.nvram.bz2
      0.170u 2.070s 0:13.59 16.4% 0+0k 0+0io 191pf+0w

      clewis@localhost % time tar xvf test1.tar win2000Serv.cfg.bz2
      win2000Serv.cfg.bz2
      0.170u 1.940s 0:14.54 14.5% 0+0k 0+0io 250pf+0w

      clewis@localhost % time tar xvf test2.tar win2000Serv.cfg.bz2
      win2000Serv.cfg.bz2
      0.160u 1.970s 0:12.31 17.3% 0+0k 0+0io 250pf+0w

      It takes just as long to extract a single file from the beginning or end of the archive, and they both take the same amount of time as processing the whole archive. Now, extracting the whole archive is much slower, because that big file takes a lot of bidirectional Disk I/O, but it's the same time whether it's at the begin or the end.

      Now watch this, we'll "Lose" the first 15KBytes, and everything after 30KBytes.

      clewis@localhost % dd if=./test1.tar bs=1k skip=15 of=test1.1.tar
      clewis@localhost % ls -la test1.1.tar
      -rw-r--r-- 1 clewis users 15360 Jan 29 17:53 test1.1.tar
      clewis@localhost % time tar tvf ./test1.1.tar
      tar: This does not look like a tar archive
      tar: Skipping to next header
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 1006 2004-01-13 13:41:20 win2000Serv.nvram.bz2
      -rw-r--r-- clewis/users 342346881 2004-01-13 14:09:11 win2000Serv.vmdk.bz2
      tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
      tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
      0.010u 0.000s 0:00.03 33.3% 0+0k 0+0io 195pf+0w

      I still got back the data that existed in the part that was saved. win2000Serv.vmdk.bz2 is corrupt, but win2000Serv.nvram.bz2 is fine.

    11. Re:thoughts by Brainchild · · Score: 1, Informative
      What's wrong with gunzip, tar?
      Have you ever tried to extract a single file from a gzip'ed tar archive? It's not possible without unpacking everything and throwing away the bits that you don't want.

      First, use your computer's multitasking capability to uncompress and extract a tarball archive member at the same time:

      gzip -dc blah.tar.gz |pax -r blah/haha.txt

      Or, for those without the POSIX utility:

      gzip -dc blah.tar.gz |tar xf - blah/haha.txt

      Second, if you don't want to have to uncompress the entire archive, use gzip and tar in the reverse order (though admittedly without the pipe):

      gzip -9 blah/*
      pax -w blah.tar blah

      You extract and uncompress in the reverse order. You also fail to compress header data (much like with zipfiles), fail to take advantage of redundant data between archive members (same as with zipfiles) and can still extract uncorrupted members from an archive where a compressed member has been corrupted (much like with zipfiles).

      There's bzip2 as well. POSIX pax and Jrg Schilling's star follow well-defined standards, and both are able to handle large (>2GB) files, as is bzip2. Last i knew, Info-Zip's zip and unzip showed their age and had troubles with files larger than 2GB on ILP32 platforms....

      --

      :: "I am non-refutable." --Enik the Altrusian ::

    12. Re:thoughts by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but, wow, you're tarring bzipped files, not bzipping a tarred file. The latter is the standard and what is built into tar, and (I undrstand) will render an archive unreadable pretty easily.

    13. Re:thoughts by dodell · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried using the -x switch with an argument in tar? Read the manpage, you can extract single files (or file paths) very easily.

    14. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you ever tried to extract a single file from a gzip'ed tar archive? It's not possible without unpacking everything and throwing away the bits that you don't want.

      This may be true, but it has nothing to do with why fewer "average Joes" (i.e., Windows users) use bzipped tar files -- there simply isn't a popular GUI front-end for the format. Last I checked, WinZip *did* support the format, but it certainly isn't the default. If someone makes a whiz-bang GUI for the tar/bzip2 combo, more people will use it. Period.

    15. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have this problem with SuperKaramba, which is also Python-based. This is probably a problem in gDesklets.

    16. Re:thoughts by ingenuus · · Score: 1

      Your right... it's a size (7z) vs. flexibility / speed (zip) issue. e.g. For larger archives where you don't expect to always extract all of the contents, zip may be more useful at the expense of size. Along a similar vein, I've often wished that Windows supported a standard transparently un/compressed filesystem usable with CDs. I know Linux supports this ro, but I think only proprietary / non-standard systems exist for Windows.

      Your comment also made me wonder if it would be advantageous to have a hybrid archive format which maintains individually compressed files using an extensible archive-global dictionary... i.e. is most of the compression improvement of "solid" archives due to the runlength crossing of file boundaries or is the bulk of compression improvement due to the ability to share a dictionary across files? ... I'm not proficient in any archive format, so please forgive my naivety if dictionaries are already shared.

    17. Re:thoughts by LauraW · · Score: 1
      It's only popular because Google is - they could have sneezed and everybody would have noticed.

      Step 1: Sneeze
      Step 2: ???
      Step 3: Profit!

      Sorry, but I couldn't resist.

    18. Re:thoughts by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Uh, if by "unpacking everything and throwing away the bits you don't want" you mean "parsing the entire file" then yes, it does do that. However I have never had a problem extracting a single file, directory of files or pattern of names from a tarball. Even compressed tarballs (remember -j or -z). You just have to feed it the right path or wildcard(s) in quotes. Only the files I want come out of the tarball.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    19. Re:thoughts by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      To the best of my understanding a "window" travels along the length of the concatinated file set as a solid archive is created. This window is the modern version of a dictionary, so therefore I believe it would be considered shared across multiple files.

      Compression can be improved for large amounts of data simply by increasing the size of this window. Some of the latest versions of 7zip allow for this window to be 32MB in size ("Ultra" compression). While this only causes 32MB of RAM to be consumed when decompressing, it causes nearly 300MB of ram to be required when compressing. My laptop with 384MB of RAM grinds to a halt trying to compress more than 32MB of files using the "Ultra" mode (though my home PC with 512MB of RAM makes short work of it).

    20. Re:thoughts by fredrikj · · Score: 1

      I just tried "Hello world", the interpreter used about 3MB RAM.

    21. Re:thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually tar will continue to read the archive after extracting the file incase there is another newer copy of the file later in the archive. I think there's a flag to cause tar to stop when it's seen all the files requested.

    22. Re:thoughts by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Damn. Tar is really showing it's age now. I can't think of any reason not to just make a new archive when you want to change one of the files in it, as opposed to appending the newer copy of it to the end of the archive. That seems to be a throwback to the days when the "t" in "tar" actually meant what it said and you were using it on tape drives.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    23. Re:thoughts by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      That's true. I was replying to the AC, which did recommend tarring a bunch of gzipped files (for different reasons), and I kinda got distracted during testing. I have a strange habit of using dd way more than any sane person should.

      I haven't verified this (I don't really want to cut up tape for an experiment), but I think hardware compression on the tape drive follows a similiar vewipoint. But it wouldn't surprise me if newer tape drives have forgotten about this. Most people don't consider Exacto and Scotch Tape to be restoration tools, and modern tape drives are getting much better about tape scrubbing.

      Personally, I don't really use tar much anymore.The tape backup software has it's own format and the tape heads have hardware compression. When I need to save disk, I just gzip the files (they're nearly always large enough that tarring them first won't save much). And rsync -z is much better for remote file copies than tarring, copying, and untarring.

    24. Re:thoughts by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      To reiterate what was said earlier, the main advantage to zip is compression + random access. My own tests comparing the two found that tar|gz took nearly three times as long to find and unpack a single file within the archive as zip, even for moderately small files. A second advantage to zip is that it is relatively smart about what not to compress. This comes in handy with OpenOffice files which can include Zip files within Zip files.

      So there is a real tradeoff that should be considered in comparing the two methods. Zip minimizes access times at the expense of compression. tar|gz maximizes compression at the expense of access times.

  19. Salt Lake City Orcs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought OrkUT was a reference to the Uruk-Hai of Utah (yes, the place where they are allowed to marry more than one goblin)

  20. two copies by SHEENmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He received them in duplicate, and he's only auctioning one copy. That said, I'd auction 'em both; the price is at $3,751.00 with more than seven days remaining!

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:two copies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, I'd auction 'em both; the price is at $3,751.00 with more than seven days remaining!

      So the best plan would be to sell the first one while claiming that you were keeping the other. Then change your mind after getting all the cash from the first.

      - AC, Prof. of Artificial Scarcity @ /.U

  21. Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They haven't let me in, so I suspect the answer is yes.

    1. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by refactored · · Score: 0, Redundant

      As Groucho Marx said, "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member."

    2. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by El · · Score: 1

      Groucho Marx's "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would have me as a member" seems to apply here...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    3. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um..why is the older post modded redundant?

    4. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If I know quote Groucho Marx as saying, "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member", then the original post containing the quote will get modded down to -1 redundant, the next post to -1 off topic and I'll make +5 funny.

    5. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by Valar · · Score: 2, Funny

      because the the same quote has come up in just about every thread about orkut...

    6. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      woody allen says "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member"

    7. Re:Did Google hit the social network bulls-eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC above me says "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member"

  22. Bytecode my interpreter! by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, So we are deciding that running interpreted languages on a byte-code interpreting virtual machine is a good use of a phone right?
    I need to go write a JVM in BASIC now (if it hasn't been done already) so that when I have kids, they can see what games under 6000fps look like.

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Bytecode my interpreter! by uberchicken · · Score: 1

      Luddite. You're at the wrong site.

    2. Re:Bytecode my interpreter! by DroidBiker · · Score: 1

      I had the same reaction. Actually it looks like the development tools were done in Java (yay, they'll run poorly everywhere!). There's no mention of how the actual Mobile Basic environment works on the phone. I doubt if it's a BASIC VM on top of a JVM. That just doesn't make sense!.

  23. Damn that silver... or lack of it by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I ran out and bought a full box of silver-less paste at CompUSA (and yes, I got the CompUSA) label on it. My attorney is filing a "false advertisement" suit against them on Monday. I figure if everyone else can get "sue happy" then so can I. Maybe I'll get to retire early.

    1. Re:Damn that silver... or lack of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your attitude is awful. What are you doing here?

    2. Re:Damn that silver... or lack of it by gooman · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you can't be part of the solution, be part of the problem.

      --
      "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  24. Hum... by Pieroxy · · Score: 0

    As I have some karma to burn, I will ask this question that has been running in my head for a while now. I might look like an idiot, but what is a Slashback?

    1. Re:Hum... by linc_s · · Score: 1

      A slashback is where they go back over previous articles and post updates, errata etc.

    2. Re:Hum... by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I am burning my karma .....
      Slashback is a general summary of the last few days/weeks top stories that have a followup. Kinda like the update tag on FARK.com, but compressed into one stories heading.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    3. Re:Hum... by momerath2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't even have to read the article to pick this up:

      "Slashback tonight brings you updates and corrections from recent and ongoing stories..."

      That's all it is.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    4. Re:Hum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but don't they do that all the time with the main stories anyway?

    5. Re:Hum... by The+boojum · · Score: 1

      I'd always figured it was a pun on the word "flashback". Just a collection of followups and flashbacks to previous stories.

    6. Re:Hum... by whacked · · Score: 1

      Er, slashback ~= flashback, revisiting past stories.

    7. Re:Hum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might look like a regular, but...

      What is an article ?

  25. Python by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    I don't see how Python figures into this. Surely they aren't going to layer a BASIC interpreter on top of Jython on top of the JVM. That seems like a horrendously poor use of resources for an embedded system with limited power and hardware volume.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  26. Zip's real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should have never been implemented with lossy compression.

  27. Invitation by Aliencow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hi guyz
    i am really cool lol :D

    plz invite me kthx

    3>3>3>3>3>3>3>3>

    1. Re:Invitation by dirgotronix · · Score: 1

      one wonders exactly how many invitations you're going to recieve as a result of this post.

      anyway, here's one from me. you're welcome!

      --
      America - Home of the scapegoat, land of the Corporation
    2. Re:Invitation by Aliencow · · Score: 1

      Woohoo ! What do I win?

    3. Re:Invitation by tolldog · · Score: 1

      *raises hand*

      Ooo me too?

      -Tim

      --
      -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
    4. Re:Invitation by dirgotronix · · Score: 1

      well, check your email for the invitation, obviously. that makes you ... a winner! (insert seizure inducing banner here)

      --
      America - Home of the scapegoat, land of the Corporation
    5. Re:Invitation by Aliencow · · Score: 1

      Seems my spam filter ate it ;)

  28. Stupid Guy Asks... by ewhac · · Score: 1

    What is XSS (Cross-Site Scripting), and what about it can be used to compromise site security?

    Schwab

    1. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cross-site scripting is when you create a form on your web page which targets a page on another site. An example of cross-site scripting used appropriately is when you insert a Google search box on your page. The search form sends the query to Google, not your site, so it's cross-site.

      The problem comes when people create deceptive forms that get the user to do bad things, or create forms that blatently allow the user to do something they shouldn't.

      Someone can easily post links and more information and make some karma off of this post...

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    2. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      An XSS attack would have the "malicious user" (hacker) inserting Javascript into a page on the site.

      Problems arise when a user hits the page the "malicious user" has tampered with. What can happen is:

      - User's cookies (username/password) stolen (this is the most typical attack)
      - User's browser window closes
      - User is pushed to nasty pictures
      - Basically anything the user can do the "malicious user" can do.

      The main problem is cookie theft. Cookies are designed only to give their data if the site requesting them is the site that gave them. (Eg. Slashdot can't read your Hotmail cookies). But since the "malicious user" can execute code on the site that did give out the cookies, it can send that information to the "malicious user" in some way.

    3. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by key45 · · Score: 3, Informative
    4. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by np_bernstein · · Score: 1

      You used brackets in quotation wrong:

      instead of:
      it's [iTunes] the least fair use-hostile." --DVD Jon.

      it should be:

      [iTunes is] the least fair use-hostile. " --DVD....


      Just and FYI.

      --
      RandomAndInteresting.comdefending the world from stupidity since 1979
    5. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by cubal · · Score: 1

      There's a bit more to it than that, but basically it involves inserting your own content into someone elses webpage, whether by sql injection (messing with their database code, usually through a form) or by managing to run arbitrary code.

      I got bitten by an attack like this - I had a site which would include a page (serverside - php) referenced by a variable in the url , like index.php?page=views/page.html. Unfortunately, I'd forgotten to check the input of the variable.

      So what this guy did was build a php file with all the code he wanted to run on my server, then just 'include' it with ?page=http://hissite/script.php. Luckily all he did was delete the index page - he could have done a lot more damage. But anyhow, that's what cross site scripting is.

    6. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a good, non-harmful example using everyone's least favorite software company as an example:

      SCO has education providers in "states of denial"

      Read the title of that page carefully, and compare the URL to the title, note how they just plop it in there. Don't worry, though, it doesn't seem to be a serious hole; it just allows you to display silly messages on the page you look at, whereas other XSS holes might be more serious.

    7. Re:Stupid Guy Asks... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, now I can fit in the last letter of "ass", as well as an exclamation point!

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  29. Python to go; what about /.? by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When are we going to be able to read /. on our mobiles? /. seems to be everyone (ok, all the /. readers') favorite way to waste time, and what better than to be able to waste time all the time, even when you're not at a computer? If any /. editors are reading this and want to try out some software to help in the task, please drop me an email.

  30. Spammer's Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can already see the tons of spam sent out with the "Invitation to Join Orkut" header. If the Orkut hype reaches moderate levels, a lot of people will open the email. Combined with the nasty worms of the last week, many people will open attachments.

    Thanks Orkut. Thanks Spammers. Thanks Russian spammers posing as script kiddies.

    1. Re:Spammer's Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why are they Russian???

  31. Google and cross-site scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As amazing as it sounds, Google don't really pay that much attention to web technologies. They may have some pretty impressive clustering, database and analysis technologies, but the way they apply web technologies such as HTML and HTTP is lacking.

    For a start-off, their website isn't even valid HTML. If they moved some of the presentation details to CSS, they could lop a massive chunk of bandwidth off their bill and take some of the load off their servers and speed up access to their site. I don't know what they are paying at the moment, but it's bound to be significant.

    Their spidering technologies only half implement HTTP. For instance, they ignore the content-type header, favouring the file extension instead. The only other software that I have heard of being that broken in terms of HTTP is Internet Explorer.

    Their ranking algorithms pay a little attention to the HTML structure (e.g. they rank keywords in <h1> elements highly), but then they comlpetely ignore other significant markup, or screw it up, like definition lists.

    So they didn't understand the rules for escaping special characters in HTML. It doesn't come as a surprise, cross-site scripting attacks bite many people who haven't paid attention to the HTML specifications.

    It's a shame, because so many people bend over backwards to get ranked highly in Google, that if Google actually tried to use HTML and HTTP properly, it would cause loads of people to write higher-quality HTML overnight.

    1. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by angio · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think you're pretty off-base with respect to Google's awareness of the byte costs of various approaches. First of all, Google is trying to optimize the user's perception of speed - and downloading a separate CSS doc would require a second TCP connection, etc., etc., which could negatively impact both the user experience and the load on Google's servers. I wager that their common case is one search per user.

      Second, have you actually _looked_ at the returned HTML from a Google search? It does use CSS within the returned page (see the style section), and it's very compact CSS and HTML.

      The rest of their site has some "potential inefficiences" that could be corrected, but keep in mind that probably more than 99% of Google's traffic is search traffic. Amdahl's law - optimize the part that slows you down the most, not the little corner cases. Google's search results pages are very efficient.

      Oh, and re the orkut thread, it was seeded with Orkut's friends and coworkers at Google, pretty much. The social network is pretty obvious in the way it grows out from there - stanford, google, bay area, computer science, geek schools, other schools, general population.

    2. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


      they ignore the content-type header, favouring the file extension instead.

      Now, wait a minute. Do they actually IGNORE the header, or do they merely have it take less precedence than the extension? Those aren't the same thing. (In other words, in cases where the file extension isn't helpful, do they drop back to the content-type?) If so, that's not google's fault. They're tring to archive the web as it is actually used in practice, by people who are on average, ignorant of the standards. There are a lot of files out there where the content-type is going to be some generic term that only tells you, "yup, it's a binary file alright", or worse, are actually downright wrong. Given that these mistakes are everywhere out there, it might be that google decided they would get a more accurate database if they let the file extensions take precedent, as wrong as that may be from a conceptual standpoint (and very unfair, too - if my file ends in .doc that doesn't have to mean it's a Word document, and google shouldn't archive it that way.)

      But anyway, the choice to let extension take precedence might be their only option. If most of the internet sites out there are doing it the wrong way, google has to aquiese and go along with that in order to have a more accurate database.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    3. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The social network is pretty obvious in the way it grows out from there - stanford, google, bay area, computer science, geek schools, other schools, general population.

      Wake me up when the girls arrive.

      -- YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    4. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      downloading a separate CSS doc would require a second TCP connection

      ...on the very first page view, which would be served straight from the ISP's cache. On every other page view, not only would there not be a second connection, but there would be absolutely zero download time for all the presentation stuff that is currently embedded directly into the page. When your site by its very nature requires highly uncachable pages, thats a big deal.

      have you actually _looked_ at the returned HTML from a Google search?

      Of course.

      It does use CSS within the returned page

      Exactly. Within the returned page. Google's results pages simply cannot be cached effectively, so every time you embed styling within a document rather than using an external stylesheet, you are wasting bandwidth and increasing download time. So when you say...

      keep in mind that probably more than 99% of Google's traffic is search traffic

      ...that's actually my whole point! Google's traffic by its very nature is the type of traffic that would most benefit from external styles.

    5. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do they actually IGNORE the header, or do they merely have it take less precedence than the extension?

      All I know is that with two identical pages, with identical inbound links, if one of them uses a wacky extension like .page, it doesn't get indexed whilst the other one does.

      If most of the internet sites out there are doing it the wrong way, google has to aquiese and go along with that in order to have a more accurate database.

      I'd agree with you if your premise was true. The fact is that I can probably count the number of pages that I have come across with the wrong content-type on one hand. Apart from anything else, it effectively makes a site Internet Explorer only.

    6. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Stormie · · Score: 1

      Second, have you actually _looked_ at the returned HTML from a Google search? It does use CSS within the returned page (see the style section), and it's very compact CSS and HTML.

      There are a few oddities in there, though - a lot of <span class=f><font size=-1>blah</font></span> type stuff, where they could have just put the font size into the CSS styling of the span class. My verdict: good, but could do better.

    7. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      on pppoe you need an mtu of 1492 (or 1454) instead of 1500.

      If it's all screwed, many web sites will not work, they never time out, they just hang.

      Google works, google searches work.

      So I'm happy about that when I get myself stuck and hovet o dl an mtu patch...

    8. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without real numbers about how IE^Wweb browsers deal with cached external stylesheets, that's all supposition.

    9. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Internet Explorer's behaviour wrt. caching is easily observable. You think caching is some kind of black magic that only people with access to MS source know how to do?

    10. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      First of all, Google is trying to optimize the user's perception of speed - and downloading a separate CSS doc would require a second TCP connection, etc., etc., which could negatively impact both the user experience and the load on Google's servers

      Except that a separate stylesheet would be downloaded once by the client browser and then cached, resulting in savings on each successive page load. Having spent a lot of time separating out CSS and Javascript on my own site, which gets nowhere near the traffic Google does, I can say this can result in substantial reductions in traffic. It also enables you to use a fast, simple, single-threaded server like thttpd to serve up the static content and leave the dynamic content to Apache.

      I wager that their common case is one search per user.

      One search per user ever? I'd wager that the bulk of Google users conduct a second search before a separate CSS file would expire from their caches.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    11. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      count number of pages that I have come across with the wrong content-type on one hand.

      I know of *LOTS* and *LOTS* that don't have an incorrect content-type, but do have an insufficiently precise content-type. ("Yeah, so this link is for a file of binary data. Thanks, that was really useful, Mr. web site maker. Oh, hey, the file ends in .doc - I wonder if it's a Ms Word document - well, that's a guess but it's a better guess than just "some kind of binary file", which, while true, isn't particularly useful.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    12. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by angio · · Score: 1
      A google returned search page for the word "search" is 20803 bytes of HTML, plus 311 bytes of header data. That's about 15 packets, so throwing in TCP+IP header overhead, it's about 21714 bytes. Without the CSS at the top, but with a few characters left for referencing the external style sheet, it's 21008 bytes. You've saved 706 bytes - or half a packet.

      You've fetched an external CSS document. Google has sent a TCP SYN ACK (40 bytes), a TCP/IP header (40 bytes), an HTTP header (311 bytes), the CSS document (706 bytes), and two ACKs (80 bytes). Total = 1177. You've also processed an extra connection to the server, whose cost is difficult to quantify.

      If your typical search model is that users grab the first page of results and go, external CSS is a big lose. You've wasted bandwidth, doubled the incoming bandwidth usage and number of server connections, slowed the user's experience, and increased the number of packets by about 20%. If users grab 3 or 4 pages, then it's a win. I bet google knows their usage patterns better than we do...

      Now, of course, this argument is actually completely wrong -- because Google is very good about using content-encoding gzip. So what's the cost of that extra header when the results page is gzipped? 4905 bytes vs. 5204 bytes. They both fit in 4 packets. That 300 bytes, effectively tagged on to the end of a packet that had to be sent anyway, amounts to pretty much squat. It's smaller than the (uncompressable, except by link compression) HTTP header required to fetch the CSS document. Note that Google doesn't compress for some browsers; if you're having problems replicating this in Opera, set your browser to ID itself as Mozilla 4.78 and it'll work properly.

      I also don't buy the "ISP's cache" argument. There are tons and tons of users who don't get proxy cached. Also, if that cache is on the other end of a modem, then you're still not saving the user the expensive bit.

      It's easy to replicate this. Fire up Ethereal, capture "tcp and port 80" while you do a google search. Follow the stream, and you'll see the relative sizes of things. The search I just did took 5536 bytes downstream - a bit more than the thought experiment version, but still 4 packets.

    13. Re:Google and cross-site scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A google returned search page for the word "search" is 20803 bytes of HTML

      Have a look at that HTML. It's full of <font> and <center> elements. Strip all that out, and you will save more than a packet.

      You've fetched an external CSS document. Google has sent a TCP SYN ACK (40 bytes), a TCP/IP header (40 bytes), an HTTP header (311 bytes), the CSS document (706 bytes), and two ACKs (80 bytes). Total = 1177. You've also processed an extra connection to the server, whose cost is difficult to quantify.

      You're forgetting about persistent connections, and omitting to mention that this only happens when the stylesheet is not cached at all, something that will be very rare.

      If your typical search model is that users grab the first page of results and go, external CSS is a big lose.

      I think you might need to study HTTP a bit more. Caches aren't magically cleared per site every time you surf away from them, and there are such things as shared caches.

      Given that somebody searching Google has probably been there before recently, and even if they haven't, somebody using the same shared cache as them almost certainly has, and that both the popularity and lack of changes causes the stylesheet to be cached effectively, I fail to see why you don't believe that a Google stylesheet won't be sourced from anywhere but Google's servers in the vast majority of cases.

      Google is very good about using content-encoding gzip.

      Again, this works in my argument's favour. If they gzip the results page on most pageviews, thye are wasting CPU time as well - a static, external stylesheet would be gzipped once and once only, not every single pageview. Of course, Google are free to gzip the results page as well, but without the styling crap embedded, it will take less resources to do so.

      I also don't buy the "ISP's cache" argument. There are tons and tons of users who don't get proxy cached.

      Irrelevent. The majority do, and those that don't will still be getting the stylesheet from their browser's cache in the majority of cases.

      Also, if that cache is on the other end of a modem, then you're still not saving the user the expensive bit.

      Again, the stylesheet is only retrieved from the network in a minority of cases. In those cases, Google can offload the bandwidth and connection to a server that is much closer to the user, freeing up their resources to serve the HTML faster.

      It's easy to replicate this. Fire up Ethereal

      Please. HTTP caching is a far more complicated topic than that. The network effect of shared caches and the popularity of the site in question can't be measured with a packet sniffer. Not that I'm saying what is happening at the packet level is irrelevent, it's just that you aren't seeing the whole picture.

  32. Strange irony by techstar25 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In a strange twist of irony, he states that he will not accept bids from zero feedback bidders, yet he himself has zero feedback. Sorry bud, but I don't buy from zero feedback sellers, although serious sellers may email me with their intentions...

    1. Re:Strange irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. He was in the papers and on TV. When you've got those mad credz...

  33. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i can't believe you'd deal with a lawyer just to get money.

  34. Business plan by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    1) Annoy Microsoft (or other high-profile company).
    2) Get sent a cease-and-desist letter.
    3) Sell it on E-bay.
    4) PROFIT!

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also:

      1) get invited to (and join) Orkut
      2) sell invitations on E-Bay
      3) PROFIT!!!

    2. Re:Business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those steps may need more detail:

      1) Annoy Microsoft (or other high-profile company).
      2) Get sent a cease-and-desist letter.
      3) Sell it on E-bay.
      3.1 Annoy the high-profile company again due to online auction.
      3.2 Get sent another cease-and-desist letter.
      3.3 Sell the new cease-and-desist letter on E-bay.
      3.4 ????
      4) PROFIT!

  35. Zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why exactly do we want proprietary encryption in an open file format? If people encode with pkzip, it will require a commercial product to read. PK is simply doing this to try to eliminate the free competition. Since PK created the zip format it really can't be called a standard, but it has became one. Winzip's, being open source, can be implemented everywhere... but there is no guarantee that the file is encoded in that format. Since they will read each others' files, users will see no difference.

  36. The clique click by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Upon clicking the link, you're taken to a page where you're told to get a friend to invite you.

    And with no way to search to see if one of your friends is a member, just so you won't know to be offended if someone you thought was a friend was on the inside and hasn't invited you.

    That's wrong, and makes me not even INTERESTED in becoming a member of Urkut!

    That is, of course, until one of your friends invites you to click into the clique. That's when the test of your character will take place.

    1. Re:The clique click by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about character? I'm IN!!!!!

  37. Catch-22? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I am unfamiliar with eBay. If a significant chunk of eBay users won't do business with users with zero feedback, how does a bidder or seller become no longer zero feedback?

    1. Re:Catch-22? by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      A 3rd party escrow service is a popular method, especially on very expensive items. Regardless of feedback level, I would recommend one for larger purchases.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  38. Orkut has no focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't know about Orkut, it somewhat feels clinched together and I miss a true focus on what TO DO there - just like friendster. I like "business social networks" such as Ryze and openBC much better because they try to concentrate on a specific audience and cater to their specific needs.

    Ryze seems to be lost in a tide of MLM scamsters, though. You cannot escape those loons there, MLM everywhere even if the Ryze AUP says otherwise. At least on openBC, they actually kick spammers and MLM recruiters from the system. I also like that openBC is a European site. It somehow feels like they really thought on how to make it attractive for non-American users, as well. Ryze is very poorly designed compared to that.

    I miss such features in Orkut. Their growth is impressive, but what for if there is no actual use for it?

    1. Re:Orkut has no focus by virid · · Score: 1

      I want to be disappointed in Orkut, too!!!! Send me an invite!!

      --
      "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
    2. Re:Orkut has no focus by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Sure thing. Email me at dojothemouse@mac.com

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:Orkut has no focus by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      [For an Orkut invitation] Sure thing. Email me at dojothemouse@mac.com

      Oh, you're not fooling us, Mr. Ashcroft!

      dojothemouse@mac.com

      And neither are you, Michael Eisner!!

  39. Artemis! That was my post!! by LordKazan · · Score: 0, Troll

    no text! I've tried to post articles and they always get rejected - then i post something and someone else get's the credit for it! grrr

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  40. Netflix, DRM, and Paranoia by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As the Register article suggests, preventing piracy with DRM would be one of the concerns if Netflix were to launch an online video-on-demand service. But let's think about this for a minute. People can already rent the physical DVDs and rip them to a digital format. Is making the files available for direct download any more dangerous?

    In fact, it's less dangerous, if anything. If you rip a generic DVD and share it on Kazaa, etc., it's completely untraceable back to you -- anyone could have ripped that DVD. However, an online video-on-demand service could embed some sort of unique watermark in the file to identify the customer, so that they could be held responsible for any illegal copying (as with the recent Oscar screener fiasco).

    In their fear of online piracy, the MPAA/RIAA/etc. have forgotten that

    1. Real-world piracy is just as much of a problem, probably more so.
    2. Customers are willing to pay for the increased convenience and instant gratification (see iTunes Music Store), which more than offsets the increased risk.
    3. Most customers don't want to be criminals, so giving them a legal option (see again iTMS) is both a good idea and profitable.

    Cheers,
    IT

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

  41. When last I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it didn't support spanning. Also the recovery record option in winRAR is handy for those who fancy themselves unlucky.

    1. Re:When last I checked... by pla · · Score: 1

      It didn't support spanning. Also the recovery record option in winRAR is handy for those who fancy themselves unlucky.

      Both fair points, although for a lossy transmission medium, you can use PAR entirely separate from RAR. They do integrate well, but actually don't need to go together. You can PAR a set of ZIPs or 7Zs just as well as a set of RARs.

  42. The text of my Orkut invite by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So are any of you guys members yet?

    No-one I know has joined yet and I've not heard much on the net so are there really any members or is it just another conspiracy theory - ie you think it's good therefore you want to join?!?

    Who knows? It's not like they've given anybody any impression of what to expect when they sign up. The Web site says next to nothing, and neither does the actual invite when you get one. Here's the text of the one I received:

    [person] <name@address> invites you to join her network of personal friends at orkut.com.

    orkut is a community of friends and trusted acquaintances that connects individuals through a social network that grows person by person.

    With orkut, you can catch up with old friends, make new acquaintances through people you trust, and maybe even find that certain someone you've been looking for everywhere.

    orkut helps you organize and attend events, join communities that share your interests, and find partners to participate in the activities you most enjoy.

    To find out why [person] thought you'd enjoy orkut and to discover who else you know is already a member, click on the link below:

    [link]

    * * *

    If you're already an orkut member, make sure that the email address at which you received this note is entered into your orkut profile. That way, you'll automatically be connected to all of your friends.

    This invitation was sent to [me] <my@address> on behalf of [person] <name@address>. If you do not wish to receive invitations from orkut, click on the link below:

    [link]
    And that's about it! Now you tell me -- do I really want to join this thing? What does it get me? Since it's Google, I guess we're all assuming it won't land us on anybody's spam lists, but how can we be sure? Is there any way to back our information out of the system if we decide it's all a pointless waste of time (or worse -- a scam)?

    And, to get philosophical -- is it really possible to meet people online? Can you really have "met" somebody ... whom you've never met before???! I just don't get the point of these "friend networks," at all.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:The text of my Orkut invite by Sancho · · Score: 1

      You can check their privacy policy. Basically, they say that they won't give out your information unless compelled to legally, or to member sites (like Google) who will have to abide by the same policy.

    2. Re:The text of my Orkut invite by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      do I really want to join this thing?

      Nope.

      What does it get me?

      Precious little, in truth.

      Since it's Google, I guess we're all assuming it won't land us on anybody's spam lists,

      Speak for yourself, pal, whilst I go about my usual business of assuming the worst, spam being so far down on my list of Bad Things, that I can hardly see it. The Government must surely be licking its chops in anticipation of getting its hands on some of this stuff one fine day when it decides it really needs it. Neither shall we discount the inevitable eventual screw ups that allow this data to be hacked, stolen, or just blundered away on the hard drives of machines that got scrapped.

      but how can we be sure?

      We can't.

      Is there any way to back our information out of the system if we decide it's all a pointless waste of time

      Nope.

      (or worse -- a scam)?

      Or worse, something worse. Much much worse.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    3. Re:The text of my Orkut invite by Ironica · · Score: 1

      And, to get philosophical -- is it really possible to meet people online? Can you really have "met" somebody ... whom you've never met before???!

      Short answer: yes.

      Longer answer: I've never really formed a "friendship" with someone online except in the context of games. First it was when I used to hang out on the Zone (now the MSN Gaming Zone... I was young, and didn't know Microsoft was evil) and I became friends with someone my age and gender in Finland. We finally met up in Denmark when I was on that side of the world, and had a great time hanging out together. She's come to visit a couple times (including for my wedding) though I have yet to go visit her. But I felt like we "knew" each other to a certain extent before we met up, and we did share a hotel room and stuff.

      Since then, I've met lots of folks in MMOGs, and there were three of those at my wedding too ;-) one of whom was there from England (though he didn't make the trip across the pond just for that... they all just made the road trip down from the Bay Area).

      I just don't get the point of these "friend networks," at all.

      I didn't either. A friend invited me to Friendster because he was feeling inadequate having so few contacts. But then poking around, the "interests" link found me a random person who was also interested in transportation. On impulse I sent him a message, and we wrote back and forth a few times. I now have a broader idea of who out there is interested in transit, the sorts of things they do, and a semi-useful contact in Boston if I'm ever looking for interface designers who understand transit (and hey, given that I'm going into transportation planning, it could definitely happen).

      It's a bit less anonymous than randomly searching the web, because you know someone who knows someone who knows them. It seems to work nicely.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    4. Re:The text of my Orkut invite by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Haha, thats the email?! If bogofilter didn't pick that up, I'd mark it spam before I'd finished reading the first line! Maybe I'm just jaded, but I think they should rework that some if they actually want members.

    5. Re:The text of my Orkut invite by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      And, to get philosophical -- is it really possible to meet people online?

      Sure. I've met people though mailing lists, then later met them in person. One karate mailing list I was on had a few get-togethers where we met and trained; someone I knew from another list, a fellow from South Africa who was touring the States, stayed at my house for a few days and visited our dojo and threw me around.

      Now, I don't at all see how this ties into "friend networks"...but if twenty years ago you told me that someone from another continent who I only knew through computers would sleep on my couch for a few days, I'm sure I would have given you a quizical look.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  43. A Fair Deal... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Funny
    Alright, you invite to join Orkut, and I will invite women. Lots of women. Some of them even like geeky guys (assuming you know how to shower and brush your teeth). I will bring these women into _your_ social network and introduce you to them. That's right, you could actually meet real women. Invite me and you MIGHT even get laid.


    Think about it - can you afford not to invite the Fnkmaster into your Orkut family? I didn't think so... don't be afraid... push that invite button...

    1. Re:A Fair Deal... by tka · · Score: 1

      So what's the situation now: any invites yet?

  44. W00 w00 w00 W000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posty Firsty?

  45. Oh the PAIN! by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Java already (sic) "runs like interpreted basic on an 8bit micro". A java implementation of interpreted basic makes me want to cry....

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  46. To me Orkut looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A giant sociology research project where a small community is created from scratch, then allowing other members enter only by invitation the entity who commissioned the research could observe how, at which speed, in what geographical direction the circle grows, also depending on other social or economical factors.
    The results could of course be used in many ways.

  47. think of it this way by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Maybe he made a copy himself. So what? Suppose he copied it five or ten times. That's a limited edition set of five or ten prints, mint condition. And it's not like these are pictures of, say, Campbell's soup or anything.

  48. In Soviet Russia... by mrvis · · Score: 0, Troll

    In Soviet Russia message disregards you!

  49. What's the point? by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

    Could someone please try to explain the point of web based "social networks" (I know the point of real world social networks)?

  50. Slashdot on mobiles by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1
    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    1. Re:Slashdot on mobiles by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 1

      Setting up the domain name is a good start, but wap.slashdot.org still serves html, not wml. I would definitely like to read /. on my mobile, if they would get it set up. Chiral Software would be happy to help.

    2. Re:Slashdot on mobiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, get over it already. WAP was still born, no one cares. If you want to read Slashdot on a mobile get a 3G phone and read the damn HTML version.

  51. Solid vs. segmented archives by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 5, Informative
    I suppose by gzip and bzip2 you mean these two programs combined with tar. By themselves they compress only single files. In fact, on a single file, gzip achieves only slightly better compression than zip -- it uses the same compression method, and any improvement is solely due to its simpler structure. Bzip2 still gets somewhat better compression.

    The .tar.gz and .tar.bz2 formats are "solid" archives: they enchain the files into a single archive, the .tar file, and then compress that as a whole. This allows them to achieve better compression because they can compress redundancies between files as well as within them. Zip, OTOH, is what I call a "segmented" archive: the files are individually compressed and the compressed images are enchained.

    Solid archives can be smaller than segmented, but are more difficult to manipulate after the fact:

    • To extract a single file from a solid archive, you have to read everything in the archive, at least up to the file you're extracting. A zip file has a directory at the end that quickly locates the desired file.
    • To add, delete, or replace files in a preexisting archive, you have to decompress the whole thing, manipulate the files, and then compress the whole thing again. It can be done, but it's slow and can take up lots of disk space. Zip can do these things directly, leaving unaffected files unchanged.
    • Finally, solid archives are more fragile than segmented ones. If a solid archive is damaged, everything from the point of the damage onward is lost. With zip, however, only the files at the damaged portion are lost, and subsequent files are still recoverable.
    IIRC RAR can generate either a solid or a segmented archive.

    Zip, furthermore, has a feature that can preserve arbitrary file metadata such as NTFS file permissions. Tar, OTOH, is meant for Unix, and can only preserve metadata relating to Unix.

    There's no technical reason that you couldn't create a .zip.gz or .zip.bz2 file, getting a solid archive that preserves all the metadata, but alas, you'd probably confuse most people doing that :-(

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
    1. Re:Solid vs. segmented archives by ingenuus · · Score: 1

      I agree with your comments. I often prefer the flexibility offered by zip over higher compression ratios offered by other formats. I recoil a bit when I read of people archiving their entire filesystem to a single tar.gz/bz2 file... great compression at the expense of future flexibility in extracting that data.

      I didn't know that zip (WinZip? PkZip? which?) could save arbitrary file metadata... in my mind, it is huge that the zip format supports this. Do you (or anyone) know if there is a Linux zip program that integrally saves per-file metadata (as opposed to having to save it separately)? ... or, perhaps ideally, a loadable kernel vfs which can mount zips read/write (plus metadata)?

    2. Re:Solid vs. segmented archives by XO · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I did that when I went to move an entire hard drive's data to another hard drive.. the tar file got damaged somehow on the way to the other drive, and i lost a few gigs worth of data. :(

      i use zip for just about everything now that doesn't require being communicated with the rest of the Unix world.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  52. So much for the exclusivity of Orkut... by psykocrime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dozens of invitations are already up for sale on
    E-Bay and can be had quite inexpensively, it would appear.

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  53. What does the invite look like? by HPNpilot · · Score: 1

    I think I blew one away thinking it was spam

  54. $10,000+ for the cease and desist!?! by agwis · · Score: 1
    Unbelievable! I can't fathom spending $100 on something like this, especially when the kid caved in for a friggin xbox and a MCSE certificate (or whatever it was).

    I'm not sure what will become worthless first...the WIPO book or SCO stock but either way this just has to be the biggest waste of money I've ever seen!

    I didn't read the article to see if a link was there but here it is again

    -Pat

    1. Re:$10,000+ for the cease and desist!?! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Unbelievable! I can't fathom spending $100 on something like this, especially when the kid caved in for a friggin xbox and a MCSE certificate (or whatever it was).
      I'm not sure what will become worthless first...the WIPO book or SCO stock but either way this just has to be the biggest waste of money I've ever seen!


      I guess YANAL then. Bloodsuckers are the kind that has disposable income and interest in that sort of stuff.

      Or well funded pranksters...It'd be kind of fun to send that to your domain-owing friend and watch him freak : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  55. A Simple Plan by 7Ghent · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Supposedly violate Microsoft's Trademark
    2. Sell cease and desist on Ebay
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:A Simple Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > 1. Supposedly violate Microsoft's Trademark
      > 2. Sell cease and desist on Ebay
      > 3. ???
      > 4. Profit!

      Is it just me, or is the third step kinda unnececasry.

  56. I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by MS_leases_my_soul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, if you join and invite me, I will paypal you $1. Then, when I go to work tomorrow, I will be all like, "Yeah, I'm on Orkut" and all the geeks at work will be like, "Dude, you are the alpha geek. Let us in!" and I will be all like "No way! You guys are lame!" and they will be all like, "Dude, you totally suck, now let us in" and I will be like ... well, you, like, get the point. 'Cause cliques are like, totally.

    It will make my Friday. I'd buy that for a dollar! ;=)

    1. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Another+AC · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'll totally let you in for $1!

      In fact, anybody who wants in, paypal me $1.

      Except.. orkut is down again now (BAD REQUEST (INVALID URL)). Nice job google. Maybe next time spend less time on booble and more time on google.

      But seriously, anybody who wants in, reply to this post. Or is it just totally open now anyway?

    2. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by JM+Apocalypse · · Score: 1

      Let me in! Me me me!

      [replace with long alpha-geek quote above]

      --

      - - - - - - -
      Orppf urp mf y.ppcxn. yflcbi otcnnov C am yflcbi yr n.apb Ekrpatv (Dvorak -> Qwerty)
    3. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Fillup · · Score: 1

      I'm very curious. $1 it is.

      --
      "I think there is a world market for, maybe, five computers." __ IBM Chairman, 1943 __
    4. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ----
      Sean
      ----

      Im down my email is sean@seanism.com. whats your paypal.

      $1 for my curiousity fix...

    5. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      $1 ready and waiting..

    6. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

      painful to say that I'm curious, let me know

    7. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by JeffM2001 · · Score: 1

      Oh, me too. Got my dollar just sitten there. JeffM2001@aol.NOSPAM.com

    8. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd buy that for a dollar!

      jsalbre (at) hotmail (dot) com

    9. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

      I'm up for that...you seem to have enough offers to start a worthwhile business... ;) james_duncan8181@ntlworld.com

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    10. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by DansnBear · · Score: 1

      Hey, I got 2 dollars for you, if you add me first.

      --

      -= Who are The Headlocks? =-
    11. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh what the hell, have my $. mar@drunkenkitten.com

    12. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Lacutis · · Score: 1

      I'll bite lacutis@NOSPAMchromotasm.com.

      $1 ready and waiting.

    13. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by seanismdotcom · · Score: 1

      I'll pay $1 on paypal for it. Show me where to sign! whats your paypal account I'll send you the cash.

    14. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by dspyder · · Score: 1

      And then I'll paypal you $2 to invite me!

      --D

    15. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Speare · · Score: 1
      This posting reminds me of a haiku I came across recently. Apparently, it was just some conversation overheard by Billy Collins at a conference on haiku, which happened to fit perfectly into the classic form:

      When he found out, he
      was like, `Oh my God,' and I
      was like, `Oh my God.'

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    16. Re:I'll PayPal You $1 If You Invite Me... by Another+AC · · Score: 1

      okay for all you guys who want in but didn't give me any way to figure out your email address.. paypal me at:

      josh at newdream dot net

      anybody I get a $1 paypal from in the next day or so, I'll assume want to be invited!

  57. Avoid 7-zip by jhohm · · Score: 0, Troll

    7-zip achieves such good compression in part by losing information. Try compressing a directory tree with same-named files in different directories and you'll see what I mean.

    1. Re:Avoid 7-zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine here... What happened on your system?

  58. Snorks, not Smurfs. by ezraekman · · Score: 1

    Hanna-Barbara had another show called The Snorks. That's probably what you're thinking of.

    1. Re:Snorks, not Smurfs. by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      You're right, he is thinking of The Snorks.. which is probably why he mentioned it in the post you just replied to.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  59. i'll invite whomever wants in by shelleymonster · · Score: 2, Informative

    yes, i'm in. shoot me an email and you can be too.

    --

    got biv?
    1. Re:i'll invite whomever wants in by XO · · Score: 1

      hmm. I can't email from work, but please invite me :) email is in profile.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  60. Friendster fights back by shelleymonster · · Score: 1

    A couple of days ago, the following message showed up on Friendster:

    We're working on it!

    We wanted to let you know what we're working on here at Friendster. As many of you have pointed out, site performance for Friendster isn't exactly where any of us would like for it to be. Rest assured. Site performance is our number one priority.

    The team here is also working on making changes to the system to meet the needs of our growing community, including new and improved features. We're not ready to show and tell yet. But we'll let you know as soon as we are.

    In the meantime, you can help us by sending your suggestions for how to make things better at feedback@friendster.com.

    --

    got biv?
    1. Re:Friendster fights back by iamsure · · Score: 1

      Yeah, friendster is a pile of crap.

      I had a completely legit profile (my only one!), with 19 friends (all real people!), and a completed profile.

      After two months of using it, one day I log in, and its gone. My profile still exists, but only the most basic information. All 19 friends were gone, all my profile information, all my personal messages, EVERYTHING - gone.

      So I emailed for support, and a form letter response indicated that "It wasnt a virus, nor could Friendster" infect my computer. WTH?

      I replied to it, but never heard back.

      Two months later, several friends report no problems with it, but my account has yet to be restored. It's very odd. I even wrote to feedback, but no response yet.

      Not a great way to build 'trust' on a social network.

    2. Re:Friendster fights back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really doubt that your profile was 'removed' for no reason. They didn't get over 5 million users by treating deleting crap willy nilly.

    3. Re:Friendster fights back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF !?! You think /. got this big with quality and reliability ?

      Humans crowd together and form herds in weird ways. They congregates in the filthiest, most expensive, awful places -- dirty bars, NYC, etc. No trendy crowd gatherer has ever worked on quality.

    4. Re:Friendster fights back by tka · · Score: 1

      So that just tries to match real life: you get screwed :/

  61. Extracting from .tar.gz by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
    Have you ever tried to extract a single file from a gzip'ed tar archive? It's not possible without unpacking everything and throwing away the bits that you don't want.

    What's wrong with:

    zcat foo.tar.gz | tar Oxf - path/to/bar > filename

    to extract a file, or

    zcat foo.tar.gz | tar Oxf - path/to/bar | less

    if you want to view it?

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
  62. I haven't seen one dev comment on zip yet by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Ok IANAPG (I am not a programming god) So maybe I don't know wtf i'm talking about...

    Anyways..

    alt.binaries.sounds.karaoke..

    SYSNOPSIS

    I've been getting into karaoke on the PC for the last year or so. I'm going to explain it for the benifit of the folks that don't know what im talking about.

    Karaoke has a special format called CDG. It's some weird kind of subcode in the audio data that can be read by compatible CD drives. The CDG data is used to display the lyrics on screen, sort of like a 320x240 BMP slide show, but with 64 pallete cyclable colors.

    They subcoded it so you could put a CD in a normal player and still get sound (without the lyrics/pictures)

    Well fast forward to 10 years past CDG creation. Some clever people figured out how to not just rip the audio data, but the CDG data as well. In order to play MP3+G karaoke you need 2 things, a .mp3 file and a .cdg file.

    Unfortunatly the CDG files are very large. Mostly it's just redundant data, so zipping it results in very nice compression. To make it easier on your fat table, you put the .mp3 and .cdg into 1 .zip file.

    So basically, there's all these karaoke zip files being created with 2 or 3 different versions of zip, all incompatible with one another.

    I wrote a crappy, lame, yes lame, really fucking lame VB bastardization for unzipping these files to a temp directory, and cue'ing the .mp3 file into winamp. I used the infozip static DLL and hacked away at the VB source project. I made something ugly that works well.

    Until I run into those zip compatibilty errors. My winamp ends up with "Pkzip 2.1 file, PKzip 2.0 support only" showing up in it's playlist instead of the karaoke song I was hoping for.

    Anyways, I just wanted to make a on topic post, and the only thing I can say about it other than explaining my situation is to say "THIS IS ANNOYING AS HELL!" Why can't the 2 zip giants get along?

    1. Re:I haven't seen one dev comment on zip yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karaoke is the devil.

  63. it is much slower by ingenuus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As the poster implied, extracting, adding, and removing individual files from a .tar.gz/bz2 archive is significantly slower than with a .zip archive (particularly as the archive becomes larger).

    Theoretically, with the right vfs interface, you could mount a .zip file read/write, providing dynamic compression... I'd actually like to see that in linux (as a pluggable kernel filesystem, accessible from the command line)... I know mc provides something like this with its own pluggable vfs, but its use is thus limited to mc.

    The main thing .tar.gz/bz2 has going for it is that it is a *nix standard and has higher compression.

    Basically, the trade-off is size (tar.gz/bz2) vs. flexibility/speed (zip).

    1. Re:it is much slower by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      you could mount a .zip file read/write, providing dynamic compression
      That's an awful idea! One of the main advantages of a zip file is that there is a hurdle to jump in order to delete or update the contents. You put a file in a zip, and it's safe from accidental overwriting. You can't just open the zipped file in an application and accidentally save over it. I really hate XP's seamless zip file access for this reason, but fortunately I don't use XP myself all that often.
    2. Re:it is much slower by ingenuus · · Score: 1
      One of the main advantages of a zip file is that there is a hurdle to jump in order to delete or update the contents.
      What's the hurdle? You can already delete and update with (as far as I know) all common zip programs. Rewriting the zip program as a vfs simply standardizes the interface, thereby improving the support and usability of those features.

      Granted, the biggest use in my eyes would be the transparent per-file decompression (ro... like zisofs) and the transparent compression may best be left to allow for incremental creation of the archive, but I suspect there may be other uses for such a system... perhaps in the embedded market?

      Actually, Java (jar) and OpenOffice xml formats (being zip files) already use transparent add / update / delete... particularly OpenOffice where the document is often modified.

      Also note that, with a vfs, you could still mount a zip file ro, protecting your data from any accidental modification.

      I haven't used XP's "seamless" zip file access either because (I think) it is solely an implementation of the explorer file manager, which I don't particularly care for (I grew up with NC)... I feel similarly about the linux "clones" of explorer, though they may have more luring features.

      However, I have used Total Commander to dynamically extract / update / add / remove files from zip archives, which I found quite useful.

      In conclusion :), I'm not quite convinced that it is an "awful idea"... vfs seems to be the appropriate standard interface for the functionality offered by zips.
    3. Re:it is much slower by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      What's the hurdle? You can already delete and update with (as far as I know) all common zip programs
      You have to open the zip file in WinZip or whatever program you choose, and pull the file out to look at it. You can't just select a file from a "recently opened files" list in an application and make changes, while not realising that you are changing a zipped backup that you thought was safe.

      I just think that if you want a compressed file system, then get a compressed file system. I use zip to keep my files safe from accidental amendment, so this 'feature' would be worse than useless to me. It would be ok if you had to explicitly mount a zip file, though.
  64. Kinda shady by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Anybody else a little annoyed with the story of this kid selling his legal documents on ebay? I mean......if it happened, great, but A. we don't really need to know, and B. this reads like an advertisement. This doesn't really belong on Slashdot.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  65. .zip just fell into the email .exe .bat /dev/null by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just finished sending out a note to our users telling them to stop using the .zip extension since the latest version of mydoom can now randomize the file name with the .zip extension. .zip joins the ranks of .exe .com, .bat, pif... At 2,400 rejects today on a 1,000 user mail server it's not worth the resources to scan or defang (with Sanitizer) and pass them on to the mail box.

  66. Mike is 17, correct? by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Somewhere buried in the bowels of eBay's user agreement, it says you have to be 18 to sign up for an account. I personally think this kid is a sleazeball, he'd fit in perfect at the RIAA. He has no problem with taking what someone else created and claiming it's his own, then cashing out when the cards are in his favor.

    What was it that Wil Wheaton said about kids that let fame go to their heads? I forget, but I'm sure it will happen to this brat - the real world has ways of deflating a bloated ego.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  67. Re:.zip just fell into the email .exe .bat /dev/nu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez, why can't you solve your problems instead of just making new ones ?

    Like the knee-jerk port blockers who just made everyone use port 80 for everything, this isn't a solution. It just means that people will start sending the files with NO extension, just the file name; mail handlers will develope enough to detect that and let winblows users click to open; and then a virus will come alone that doesn't use an extension in it's file name.

    After that, you will ban attachements all together. Your users will switch to sending files through one of the IM programs, and then a virus will use that means of spreading, and you'll ban that too.

    Here's a fucking idea. Find a way to have computers that do what YOU AND YOUR USERS WANT, and not what some pimply faced teenager a continent away thinks would be funny.

  68. Ebay Hipocracy by ocie · · Score: 1

    From the ebay listing:

    Sorry, I will not be accepting bidders with 0 feedback. If you have 0 feedback and are serious, please contact me via the contact seller link at the top of this auction so that I may verify your intentions.

    P.S. Mike Rowe has zero feedback on Ebay and created his account on 26 January.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  69. MARK PARENT AS TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he has no idea what he is talking about

    You see, it is 'obvioussly' the interperter and no the program, and not the sensors.

    1. Re:MARK PARENT AS TROLL by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

      mark parent as idiot. Run a python script and check top. What do you see as the name of the process smartass? I'll give you a hint, it's Python. My point was mainly that interpreted languages such as python tend to take more resources than non-interpreted languages. And since resources are at a premium on small devices, using interpreted languages on said devices MAY not be the best idea...

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
  70. Re: Joining by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    You remind me of the Groucho Marx line (paraphrasing): "I'd never join a group that wanted me as a member."
    I have the same problem with women.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  71. Thanks. Yuck. Pending patents. by phr1 · · Score: 1

    Looks like there's pending patents for the PKWARE format even though it's completely straightforward. It includes both password-based symmetric encryption, and public-key encryption using x509 certificates. There's a no-royalty license that I didn't bother to read but it looks like for the public-key format, you're only allowed to decrypt encrypted files under the license, not encrypt new ones. If they're going to use x509 certificates I don't understand why they didn't stick with s/mime format.

  72. Re: "Email me!" by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, I just thought of a neat new way to harvest email addresses ...

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  73. I'll invite anyone to Orkut by Snosty · · Score: 1

    All I ask in return is that you set me up with your sister. She should be between the ages of 18 and 28 and living in London, England.

    Seriously, why pay for an invite when all you have to do is pimp out your sibling. Think about it, people. You know how to contact me.

  74. You must be jewish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, I know you are.

  75. WinRAR by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0

    Need I say more? Better compression that Zip. For those of you who will talk about 7zip; 7zip is too slow compared to winrar, almost 4 times slower while having 5-10% better compression, which is not worth it. You have to compromise between time and compression ration, WinRAR is a good bet.

    1. Re:WinRAR by XO · · Score: 1

      Well, those of us that use Unix, can actually compress files while we continue to use our computer. Windows, even XP, still has horrible latencies when programs that want a lot of CPU go CPU bound. Unix has very little of that.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    2. Re:WinRAR by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0

      I can use XP by setting the thread priority on the process to something lower than normal. That has nothing to do with 7zip. 7zip has a slow algorithm.

    3. Re:WinRAR by XO · · Score: 1

      I was attempting to be funny. :P

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  76. Orkut: Wannabe Elitists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Invitation only? Hah... these are a bunch of people who didn't get into the country club and just want to feel special...

    They probably think that people will end up being envious of an Orkut card... like it means diddly squat..

    I bet they all vote Democrat, too...

  77. Orkut - Just A Cybername for 'Clique' by Ora*DBA · · Score: 0

    And geeks support this?

  78. Re:.zip just fell into the email .exe .bat /dev/nu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >why can't you solve your problems
    Uh I just did, you obviously have never seen a Company brought to it's knees by a worm - the cost in time and $ is such a waste.

    >and then a virus will come alone that doesn't use an extension in it's file name
    True, but thats future, Could the fact that Windoze needs file extensions to run be the achilles heel to the regular virus ?

    > ban attachements all together
    Thats already happening for some.

  79. Well I use Power Archiver by knigitz · · Score: 1

    Encryption of files and archives using 5 different methods: Blowfish (128-bit), DES (64-bit), Triple DES (128-bit), AES 128-bit, and AES 256-bit.

    That, plus all this here would be why I use Power Archiver.

  80. Re: "Email me!" by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Dude, with the XSS bugs in Orkut, joining Orkut is the equivalent of getting your email addresses harvested.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  81. I would join by ZINGYWINGY · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would join Orkut if the text in the jpg on their home page had the grammatically correct sentence "Whom do you know?"

    But alas.

  82. MOD PARENT AS *REDUNDANT* by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Yoda

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  83. Re: Joining by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

    Dammit, me too! If a woman seems interested in me, I start thinking, "OK, what's wrong with her?" Doesn't happen that often, though.

    --
    one hundred twenty
    is just enough characters
    to write a haiku
  84. Best Pyramid Scheme Evar! by xmedar · · Score: 1

    1. Set up social-networking site
    2. Let no one in
    3. Once everyone is talking about it ask for $1 per invite via PayPal
    4. Profit!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  85. wow! it's up to $28,100.00 now! by 0biJon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and there's still six days to go!
    who the hell would pay that much for this shit?
    it's probably not that hard to get your own C&D from microsoft.

    --
    ?Who controls the past now, controls the future.
    Who controls the present now controls the past.?
  86. Re: Joining by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Really?
    I thought that you and Edna Crabapple had something going on.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  87. Orkut? Why? by MXi · · Score: 1

    Hmm... what is the advantage of the orkut system over say chatting to your mates in a private chan on IRC, or on MSN, or posting on a forum?

    --
    The world would be a better place if...
  88. Can't help it... by mynameis+(mother+... · · Score: 1

    I really wouldn't worry about it, you could always sue him...