Slashdot Mirror


Introducing Linux to Joe Average

eco2geek writes "The local "alternative newspaper" is running a cover story titled 'The Rebel Alliance: An unlikely army of hacker hippies, geek visionaries, idealistic teachers and corporate giants is making Portland ground zero of a digital revolution.' I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything, but the article does give the average reader a good introduction to what Linux is, why it's important, and some of the politics surrounding it. (The article also mentions 'the frenetic Slashdot.org.' :-)"

371 comments

  1. So many funny quotes by debilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Check these out:

    Torvalds, now a 34-year-old tech superstar whom some see as the love child of Thomas Edison and Che Guevara,...

    "Linux wasn't started as any kind of rebellion against the 'evil Microsoft empire,'" Torvalds told The New York Times last year. "I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect."

    "In a school, it's public money. How should it be spent? Is it ethical to buy software instead of hiring an art teacher? Me, I want an art teacher--not the Microsoft help assistant dancing on every student's desktop.

    "Why spend billions," said one Amazon tech guru at the time, "when you can spend millions?"

    So funny. I'd post more quotes but I'm too lazy too read the rest of the article. :)

    1. Re:So many funny quotes by tomcrick · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Surely this has to rank as one of the biggies:

      "Linux wasn't started as any kind of rebellion against the 'evil Microsoft empire,'" Torvalds told The New York Times last year. "I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect."

      Oh well, never mind, move on etc....

    2. Re:So many funny quotes by millette · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google picked up about 700 pages with "that will just be a completely unintentional side effect"...

    3. Re:So many funny quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      News flash: the open source and priprietary software poles are not actually involved in a zero-sum game, for all the mouthpieces in the respective camps love the sound of their own voices.
      They serve different audiences, their goals sort in different orders, and they use different methods to achieve the same aim: getting the job done.
      Yes, the demagogues can be entertaining or alarming, depending on the moment. Yes, the legal and technical skirmishes can be quite entertaining. Yes, the market power of his Majesty Satanic may eventually be diminished.
      But no, the GPL worker's paradise will never be fully realized, and no, the GPL/BSD free-as-in-the-love-of-God software that continues to grow in usefullnes will not just go away, and no, you shan't be free of spam short of killing all your email boxes.
      It's, like, a market, or something, dude.
      Information Technology is a means to an end. What has occured is that too many view the means as an end unto itself, and expected to jump in and make ridiculous money for minimal effort. Guilty.
      The market forces eroding the IT economy are perfectly reasonable, and the pathetic attempts of Some Cretinous Orangutans are unsurpsing. My fear is that the chemotherapy required to purge the legal system of the cancer of monopoly will have catastropic effects on the legal system, which is brittle enough on its own.
      What a wandering rant.

    4. Re:So many funny quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. I see "497" results...

    5. Re:So many funny quotes by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I see 739. but then again, how many results you see will depend on your settings for google: multiple languages or just english, for instance...but you knew that, right?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:So many funny quotes by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      What a wandering rant.

      I still would have given you a point if I had it. Been getting mod points about once every two weeks for the last few months anyway. Whats up with that?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:So many funny quotes by csbruce · · Score: 1

      Google picked up about 700 pages with "that will just be a completely unintentional side effect"...

      Maybe it'll be 7,000 by sundown. I've updated *my* quotes page! :-)

    8. Re:So many funny quotes by Krunch · · Score: 1

      "Tux the Penguin is a fat little thing. He's google-eyed and sports a grin that suggests a recent lobotomy.

      "Think of battle scenes from Braveheart. Picture the Montagues and the Capulets, the Yankees and Red Sox, snakes and mongooses. The way some people look at it, that's Microsoft and Linux."

      "Kristen Accardi says Linux seduced her in college. "It was like peer pressure," she says. "'Try this Linux stuff.' So I did.""

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    9. Re:So many funny quotes by millette · · Score: 1

      I think you misread me. I mean it's an old quote... But then again, there are 40 more hits for it on google now... You're going to want to update your page again. The quote is actually from an interview with NY Times, September 28 2003.

    10. Re:So many funny quotes by millette · · Score: 1

      ... cuz you've set your google preference to only search for english pages.

    11. Re:So many funny quotes by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      as he stated, ABOUT 700

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    12. Re:So many funny quotes by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      yes, and if you look at the actual parent I was replying to, it was saying only 400. My guess is you have your preferences set to read at +1 only, or you would have seen the actual parent.

      The reply you are referring to is the grand parent, which I was agreeing with, and explaining HOW they were different.

      You might want to set your preferences to read at 0 or -1 to prevent this kind of mistake again.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    13. Re:So many funny quotes by bytesplit · · Score: 0

      Why the regurgitation? Anyone that wants to read a feel-good story on Linux can just search at google.

      --
      real geeks hate soap operas.
    14. Re:So many funny quotes by gaijin99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Torvalds, now a 34-year-old tech superstar whom some see as the love child of Thomas Edison and Che Guevara,...
      Ick. Why would anyone want to compare Linus to that looser Edison? I mean, he invented two bloody things in his entire life, the rest was invented by other people who had signed contracts that gave Edison all rights to their inventions and let him take the credit. I'd say Bill Gates is closer to Edison (remember, Bill didn't actually code anything for DOS or Windows, he hired it done). I suppose I should complain about the Linux/Che comparison too. I don't want this "Free Software == Communism" BS to spread either; but frankly the Edison comparison is more personally offensive to me.

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    15. Re:So many funny quotes by whiteknight31 · · Score: 1

      I see 689..... I hate the sutpid 20 secound rule....

    16. Re:So many funny quotes by sommere · · Score: 1

      check out ossadvocacy.org

      it has a well worded paper on why schools should use OSS.

    17. Re:So many funny quotes by AndroidonPPC · · Score: 1
      Do not forget how the article plainly states that linux SAVED the district money. I thought all that 'independant' research proved only Microsoft programs saved money!

      It's nice to see linux in schools. My college over the course of 2 years phased out some nice linux servers in exchange for really crappy windows boxes because the school turned into some sort of microsoft school. Bah. So, when I highschool does it, awesome. -Andy in Chi

    18. Re:So many funny quotes by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if they said Tesla and Che Guevara no one would have understood the reference.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    19. Re:So many funny quotes by kasperd · · Score: 1

      cuz you've set your google preference to only search for english pages.

      When I search it says only about 493. And I haven't changed any preferences.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    20. Re:So many funny quotes by RealityThreek · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about Tesla. But the little I do know is that most of his work was largely ignored. I hope the same can't be said about Linus.

      --
      :wq
    21. Re:So many funny quotes by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      A contemporary of Edison, who was the inventor of a ton of stuff, he failed because he was his opposite, invented stuff, but didn't sell it. Edison didn't invent much, but he was tenacious about selling it. I think he was responsible for the development of most of the technology that makes our electrical system work using alternating current. Westinghouse was the popularizer of these developments. Goes a long way to show which we value more in the US.
      The contrast between Edison and Tesla is similar to the differences between Jobs and Woz (although they never worked together and were bitter rivals), the marketers face and name gets associated with the product even if they had little to do with the development.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    22. Re:So many funny quotes by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      actually, that's interesting. I was wrong, but I don't have my prefs set to +1, though I DO have AC's pre-modded down.

      More pertinently, why would ANYONE search for an ENGLISH LANGUAGE quote in languages other than English?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    23. Re:So many funny quotes by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The default for google is all languages, as it is the recommended setting. go to google and hit preferences. I makes the forever living cookie that remembers for that computer. but you can adjust several ways google acts. I usually leave it for all languages because several non english sites are still in english or have links to english versions, so its worth it as long as the results are relevent.

      As to AC's, I find some of the best comments come from ACs. So do some of the worst, but the wheat is worth the chaff when it comes to ACs.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    24. Re:So many funny quotes by rattler14 · · Score: 1

      Ick. Why would anyone want to compare Linus to that looser Edison? I mean, he invented two bloody things in his entire life, the rest was invented by other people who had signed contracts that gave Edison all rights to their inventions and let him take...

      -True, but he did found a little company called GE... which seems to be doing rather well, and doing a lot of really great things. Besides, lights are kindof, i dont' know, important.

      --
      my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  2. Wow! by Pingular · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pretty impressed as it's only a 'local alternative newspaper' that it's not buckling under the Slashdot effect, in fact it hasn't even slowed down!
    Even stranger is the Netcraft 'what's that site running?' results, showing that the server was recently running MacOS!

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Whoah, you're right.

      They switched everything to PHP from this weird-ass "lasso" crap they had before. The URLs were like http://www.wweek.com/flatfiles/News4550.lasso

      They switched just in time for their Linux article, too. Coincidence?

      Weird, anyway.

    2. Re:Wow! by siphi · · Score: 0

      Hey anyone notice how SCO.com has finnally crippled under MyDoom???? We have finally found a use for windows.

      It wasnt working when i tryed it now anyways

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Haxalot, and it's at least partially karma whore, but REDUNDANT? Sure, 25 words are in the first sentence which is the karma-whore-old-slashdot-cliche-mod-into-the-groun d part, but 18 words are in the sentence with the link to Netcraft, and I, for one, find it extremely interesting that they switched to Linux when they did, and that they actually ran a webserver on a Mac (does MacOS X report something other than MacOS in Netcraft? If not, I guess they could have been running OS X).

      *checks Post Anonymously, waits for $rtbl*

    4. Re:Wow! by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever seen those big maps showing the Internet's backbone providers? Look at Porland, OR.

      We have more bandwidth than god.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    5. Re:Wow! by jes5199 · · Score: 1

      'local alternative' works a little differently, here in Portland. I daresay that things with those words on it outcirculate the more traditional products, so obsessed this city is with local and with alternative.
      Portland's meta-alternative paper is going to have the budget/performance/quality that you were expecting.

      --
      monkeys.
    6. Re:Wow! by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      Why is that -1? Netcraft shows (in the link of the grandparent) that they are running Linux!

    7. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he got a terrible karma, so he starts with -1
      terrible karma=post first, think later

    8. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does God use IPv6 yet?

    9. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least as he has on this planet. Some of the others out there, however, may have more of God's bandwidth allocation. That's why, really, that we have been trying to venture out into space, to see if we can find "heaven". This is only a start in our quest for the source of all bandwidth, Almighty God!

  3. Farmers using Linux? by RinzeWind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, yes! Right here! The average Joe can handle Linux just as well as he can handle Windows. Teach a little boy Linux from the very first moment he touches a keyboard and he'll be just fine. The sad part is the national government is in bed with Microsoft. Let's hope that little project keeps going.

    1. Re:Farmers using Linux? by dcw3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The sad part is the national government is in bed with Microsoft.

      Wow, you need to take off the tin-foil had buddy.

      I've been working for 26 years on govt. contracts using just about every flavor of *NIX you can think of. There's no great love for Richmond any more than there is for other large companies. Now if you're talking about lobbists being in bed with govt...that's an entirely different story.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Farmers using Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this would only be true on Discworld.

    3. Re:Farmers using Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cllate ya, jodido sudaca comechorizo.

    4. Re:Farmers using Linux? by nanowyatt · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's no great love for Richmond

      The Civil War is over, buddy. Jeff Davis, Robert E Lee, and good ol' Stonewall are all dead and buried. It's time to let Virginia back into our hearts.

      Even the Great Emancipator has stopped by to say hello.

      --
      Intellectuals! Liberals! Peacemongers! IDIOTS!!!
    5. Re:Farmers using Linux? by BOFHelsinki · · Score: 0

      LOL! Thanks for the comeback of the day :-)

    6. Re:Farmers using Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The armed services have mostly switched from unix to nt. If you haven't been awake for it, it has been discussed on slashdot many times including the aircraft carrier that sat dead in the water because of it. Bush influenced the Justice Dept. to let Microsoft off the hook after they had them over a barrel. Were you unaware of that too?

    7. Re:Farmers using Linux? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The Civil War is over, buddy. Jeff Davis, Robert E Lee, and good ol' Stonewall are all dead and buried. It's time to let Virginia back into our hearts.

      Damn, hate it when I get my enemies mixed up. Good catch, though it's true that most of us Virginians have no great love for Richmond (or Redmond for that matter). Guess I'm already slackin' off that New Year's resolution to preview more.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    8. Re:Farmers using Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " There's no great love for Richmond any more than there is for other large companies."

      You dont know how right that is, and how much you gvmt ppl loooove big companies...so yeah id say ya love microshaftoldgrannies alot

  4. Advertisements by PuffCammy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frankly I see advertisements of Linux as a good thing, I mean more people should merely just know of Linux.

    --
    And the day came when the risk to remain closed in a bud, became more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
    1. Re:Advertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you think it would be good if every who used windows used linux instead? People would write spyware programs for linux instead of windows, then viruses for linux instead of windows, before you know it, linux will be the trash of the OSs

    2. Re:Advertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another why reason people should switch to one of the *BSD's.

      Linux has become a corporate tool. It has lost its soul to greed, but this greed was needed to compete with Microsoft. I fear Linus has betrayed the linux community, and will betray us more in the coming years.

      I already whiched to FreeBSD and I am loving it. FreeBSD 4.9 blows Linux 2.4 away not only in terms of performance, but in terms of completeness(man pages, handbook, etc..). To bad Linux 2.6 was too unstable, bloated and ripe with security holes.

    3. Re:Advertisements by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Any chance you work for Microsoft?

      I mean, seriously, unless all those people start running Linux as root all the time, it's just never going to be the same, so please drop the FUD.

    4. Re:Advertisements by PuffCammy · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to spread anything but the knowledge of Linux. Many People don't know what it is. The TV Commercials and such show the world that yes, Linux is existing.

      --
      And the day came when the risk to remain closed in a bud, became more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
  5. Ka-chink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet another Phys.Rev.B for me!

    1. Re:Ka-chink! by bierik · · Score: 1

      I prefer Phys. Rev. D (that last one is accepted but not yet published).

  6. death match! by rotciv86 · · Score: 1

    "It's an MTV-style Death Match," says David Chen
    I'd like to see that! Linus vs. Bill
    hehe

    --


    My ghEtt0 webpage.
    1. Re:death match! by xeer0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      rotciv86 your sig has a bug. You specify int, but main() is not returning anything.

      No I am not in QA. I am your inner compiler.

      --
      "Hey... don't be mean." --Buckaroo Banzai
    2. Re:death match! by tttonyyy · · Score: 3, Funny
      int main() {printf("Hello World");}

      Throw that sig in, and the fight would go like this:

      Linus: "Surely void main(void) since you've got no return, and you forgot to include your IO libraries for printf!"
      Bill: "Arrgghh - fire the secret weapon! #pragma align -0.5"

      (At this point Linus core dumps and Bill locks solid in the same position for 5 minutes until the referee resets him. Linus just gets on with it, but Bill returns to his corner to scandisk and blame the referee for not shutting him down properly).

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    3. Re:death match! by rotciv86 · · Score: 1

      it's not a bug it's a feature...

      --


      My ghEtt0 webpage.
  7. If you want Joe Sixpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you want Joe Sixpack to use linux, you just have to show him how fun it can be! Like this picture from a wild linux-party :)

    http://linuxforum.dk/2003/billeder/chlor/r001724 3. jpg

    Oh, they're a wild bunch!

    1. Re:If you want Joe Sixpack by Lispy · · Score: 1

      It's not that the competition looks that much better...

    2. Re:If you want Joe Sixpack by bigdavex · · Score: 1
      --
      -Dave
    3. Re:If you want Joe Sixpack by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      Oh, they're a wild bunch!

      Its so exciting that the two people in the background are busy recompiling a kernal as we speak! w00t!

  8. Open source: competing for new users? by Debian+Troll's+Best · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The story about Portland being a hotbed of Linux activism and getting a lot of new users into the community reminded me of a recent experience. I just built an Athlon XP PC for a friend who needed a cheap system just for the standard sort of computing tasks, you know, web, e-mail, some word processing and maybe a bit of light package management. Of course the finishing touch to a nice, budget Athlon XP was going to be Debian, with Mozilla for web/e-mail and OpenOffice.org to take care of office needs. But when it was time to break out the install CDs, my friend asked a very surprising question: "So are you going to install FreeBSD on my system?"

    It took a while for the words to sink in. I mean, my friend works in the publishing industry, and while she uses computers all day for word processing and presentations and stuff like that, I didn't expect her to know about FreeBSD. So I asked "Why FreeBSD? Have you been reading OSNews again?"

    She gave me a strange look and replied "No, because FreeBSD is free, and I've heard all sorts of things about Linux getting picked up by the big corporates. Those IBM ads are everywhere! I thought Linux was going to be expensive...more expensive than Windows!"

    I went ahead and install GNU/Debian for her, lecturing her solidly on the finer points of apt-get while we installed all 6 CD-ROMs from my laptop over a heavily degraded 802.11b link (I'd removed all the RF shielding from her PC's case to 'lap' the hard drive). But it got me thinking. Are Linux distros losing out to FreeBSD when it comes to new users simply because of their names? I mean, who's going to know that GNU/Debian Linux doesn't cost $699 per seat? FreeBSD says immediately that the product is free

    I'll put a question to the community...do people think that it might be worth re-naming Debian in some markets (like campus bookstores, for instance) to FreeDebian? I mean, Tux could even hold a pitchfork or something. Do people think that a 'marketing friendly' name is important? Would this get the Debian developers off-side with the FSF, or would they understand? Would the viral nature of the BSD license necessitate distribution changes because of the 'Free' in the name? I welcome comments from the GNU/Linux and FreeBSD communities equally!

    1. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by vericgar · · Score: 1

      "Tux could even hold a pitchfork or something."

      We are trying to attact users, not scare them away... if you didn't know what Tux was, what would you think if you saw Tux holding a pitchfork? I'd run for my life I think.

    2. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by S3D · · Score: 1

      "war penguin" is a persisten unit in all Age Of Wonders series of games.

    3. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whoa - your friend just proved that despite the efforts of IBM, Red Hat and others to defend Linux against the FUD being spread by its competitors, that some of it is still getting through to the enduser. Her comment about Linux being swallowed by the corporations is a frightening one, and proves (at least to me) that we need to be much more proactive when it comes to explaining the philosophy and history of the Linux distribution, so that people don't continue to make this mistake in their thinking.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    4. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Might be a troll (first clue: Debian Troll's Best), but good point about FreeBSD. My guess is that this person didn't know that much about Linux, saw all the IBM ads, and figured IBM was going to start charging. However, would Joe Sixpack make the connection? I guess some of us should have gotten 30 seconds on the Super Bowl to explain Linux to Joe Sixpack. Also, the pitchfork is a bad idea. They say that the penguin is cute. Making him hold a pitchfork implies that it's Depenguinated to geeks, and evil to others.

    5. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      I doubt that sort of name change will win anything. Too many people think "free" is the same as cheap, as in shoddy. Or worse, used only by poor people.

      I would instead suggest the use of a name that implies ease of use. e.g. EZLinux

      Average user really wants to uncomplicate an overly complicated gadget. The price of the OS is not that important to him.

    6. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Tux could even hold a pitchfork or something

      How about a Tuxinated version of American Gothic? Folksy, down-to-earth, hard-working back-to-the-lan values... (Ignoring the slight creepiness or other take-offs like in Rocky Horror.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by no+longer+myself · · Score: 2, Funny
      Renaming any Linux distro is fine by me (Redhat -> Fedora), but it's like any other brand that thinks it can change its name to improve its image. There's always a backlash...

      So just tell ol' blondie that you're installing FreeDebian. It doesn't sound as cool as FreeFedora, but it just sounds much better than FreeMandrake.

    8. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Ya know that if you had gone by what your friend wanted and installed FreeBSD, you would have been installing an OS instead of a religion.

      Of course, M$ and Apple are also religions along with Linux, but the BSD license is about the only one thats says We Don't Need Your Fucking Ideals Push On Us Or Anyone Else.

      BSD is free in all senses of the word...the only thing these guys ask for is for the credit given back to them (and I think the latest BSD license even took out the 'advertising' clause because whiny GPL Founders complained that this isn't fair -- they want to use the license, but only want to advertise their religion instead of the folks that designed the software (ok, that part was a bit flamebait). BSD doesn't care what you do with the software. Embed it into a commercial app. Cool. Take the software, make no edits, and release it under a religious type licensing. Their programmers don't get all bitchy when someone takes their work and makes a product with it and gets rich while they are left holding a donation hat.

      WHY? Because they do this for the greater good. GPL is explicitly there for the eventual removal of copyright -- that might be good, it might not be. There are arguments on both sides. Personally, I don't want my copyrights to be removed simply because I used a piece of open source I found on the net that saved me 10 weeks of programming.

      BSD developers don't get into the debate as to whats right or wrong about copyright -- they simply say that this particular piece of software is free to do what they want.

      So, deciding on whether you like GPL (Linux) over BSD comes down to personal preference and your zealoustry.

      Having said that, I *LOVE* Max OSX and I don't think it would have come out if it was simply Linux with the Aqua Interface as opposed to BSD with the same.

      On the non-Mac side, I prefer a certain Linux distro because thats what I'm use to these days (after getting off a commercial release several years back).

      So, either decide with your heart (Religion vs. Agnostic) or by the Distro (FreeBSD vs. Debian). There is no wrong choice other than forcing your choice onto others.

    9. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 1

      Freebian GNU/Linux :-)

    10. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do not feed these trolls anymore, although this thread was semi-interesting, all reasonably interesting points have probably been made by now.

    11. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll put a question to the community...do people think that it might be worth re-naming Debian in some markets (like campus bookstores, for instance) to FreeDebian?

      Ogg/Vorbis. Need I say more? Sounds "foreign", where "wav" files sound friendly, and its easy to guess what it stands for. This is like the Linux pronouncing debates 3 or 4 years ago (Lie-nux vs. LEE-nux vs Lin-ux) In the end, it doesn't matter because new users are going to pronounce it how it looks.

      One thing that OSS developers can learn from us "evil persons in the marketing world" is that a name DOES matter (Shakespeare be damned) and it is the name that creates the first impression. This is the whole reason Lindows fought for its right to use the name, because it tells what it is by the nature of the name.

      As Free Software begins to gain more and more acceptance, I think you will be seeing less obscure names, or other companies will simply take GPL software and rename it to a more reasonable term for public acceptance. This is sure to piss off more than a few authors, but otherwise, the programs won't get acceptance.

      PERL: Good name, easy to say, means something.
      SPAMASSASSIN: Ditto. The best possible name.
      GNOME: Bad name. A little evil dude, I dont want him in my computer, or my underwear drawer.

      OUTLOOK: Decent name, positive ring to it.
      FRONTPAGE: Good name, means what it is
      OFFICE: Good name, obviously.

      While I find recursive acronyms amusing, most people find them confusing, or more likely, they don't know what it is, even after you explain it. Its been a few years, but it confused me at first, and probably all of us. We need to be more reasonable if we want people to accept OSS on the desktop.

      Part of the problem is many authors don't care if the masses use their programs, and prefer it to be a leet few, which is why IBM et al will just repackage the programs with shiney new names and piss them off. Don't worry, we will be talking about "how wrong" it is to do this in a year or two.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently posted on how I feel about the names like "FreeSomething" or "OpenAnything". Here are some of my further thoughts.

      I think this stuff is redundant. Freedom or Openness should be in the heart, not the name. I can understand if open source apps want to use unnecessary advertising of the parent project in form of "GNU Something" or "GNOME Anything", because that's just normal kind of titles (not too far from "Microsoft Whatever", which people will then casually call "Whatever".)

      But "Free" or "Open" in the title is an unnecessary wart. The "GNU" or whatever titles imply that they're part of a group of applications from a single vendor; there's nothing wrong with that. Yet, "Free" or "Open" implies different kind of relationship: This product vs. a specific product, or this product vs. the rest of the world.

      It carries a certain kind of connotation of competition: "This program is Free, the other program isn't, so use this program!" It can be a double-edged sword that's almost like free advertising for the proprietary competition: "Hey, this program is Free, but that other program costs money, so it has to be good!"

      Herein lies some duality: It is almost if this "free" program couldn't exist without the competition - We have "FreeBSD" and the "not-so-free UNIXes". We have "OpenOffice.org" and "StarOffice". Yin and Yang.

      "Free" or "Open" imply attitude. There's no place for attitude in software names.

      My original complaint was about the name "XFree86". It's a pun on "X386", which was what the project was known as over a decade ago. It might have been funny back in the day - "Ooh, it's like X, but it's free!" - but now it just looks silly. "Specification from 1986?" ...or "80386 code in my beautiful Macintosh? No way!"

    13. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best. Troll. Ever.

    14. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As one who develops enterprise level data-center solutions for high end customers (hardware and infrastructure, not usually code) I'd have to say I'm just not buying this 'holier than thou' BSD tirade.

      While it's true that "Linux" is not the answer to every question, neither is *BSD, or Slowlaris, or AIX... etc.

      Yes, many people are "Linux Zealots". Many are "Windows Zealots". But, for my money, if not in numbers, certainly in snobbery quotient, *BSD zealots win... :)

      Face it, all of them, from AmigaDOS to ZeOS (wasn't there one called that?), there are zealots - that doesn't mean that everyone who uses Linux is a zealot, or incapable of seeing past the end of his/her floppy disk.

    15. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      However, it suprises me that so many non-tech-saavy-students at school use Tux as their Windows wallpaper without realizing that it's the Linux mascot, not to mention what linux is.

      (I'm one of only three people running Linux at my school, and I'll think I'll have to hand out Linux Live-CD's preconfig'ed for the school network soon :( )

    16. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      GIMP: Dont want no leather clad prevert gettin medeival on my ass.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    17. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      This is like the Linux pronouncing debates 3 or 4 years ago (Lie-nux vs. LEE-nux vs Lin-ux) In the end, it doesn't matter because new users are going to pronounce it how it looks.
      The guy next door at my dorm always pronounces it "MoZEEla." But at least he uses it :)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    18. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by DarkVader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, BSD strikes me as far more of a religion than Linux these days.

      Which is kind of sad. I'm typing this on a Mac, which is siting right beside a Fedora box.

      As far as I'm concerned, if your goal is ease of use and install on a *nix distribution, Mac OS X has it, and some of the Linux distros are getting there.

      FreeBSD proper, the last time I touched it, was not even close.

    19. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by gaijin99 · · Score: 1
      BSD is free in all senses of the word...the only thing these guys ask for is for the credit given back to them
      Which is why the BSD license isn't my favorite license. I give my source away and get *absolutely*nothing* in return. I'm not that nice, I guess. With the GPL I get more code back. That's what hackers want: code to play with; code to learn from; code to do whatever with. BSD is great if you want to simply give away your work. The GPL is great if you want something back.
      WHY? Because they do this for the greater good.

      Their programmers don't get all bitchy when someone takes their work and makes a product with it and gets rich while they are left holding a donation hat.

      Ahem, not to be nasty but I've got to say that your pro BSD arguments sounded mighty religous to me. Face it, many (not all, but many) form religous attachments to all sorts of things. I see people driving trucks with bumper stickers that say "I'd rather walk than drive a [insert other truck brand here]" Religious attachemnt to things like OSes, trucks, *text*editors*, etc, are silly, but, well, humans are pretty silly sometimes. Your comments looked pretty attached to BSD. Mine may look attached to the GPL to you, I don't know.

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    20. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by damiam · · Score: 1

      OSX is not BSD with an Aqua interface, it's Darwin (Mach) with an Aqua interface and some of the BSD toolset (along with parts of the GNU toolset).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    21. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by clifyt · · Score: 1

      A religion tries to force itself down your throat. If you don't believe in it, you are wrong.

      BSD doesn't force any of this. Its practically public domain, but asking that you respect the fact someone else programmed the stuff and display their contribution if prompted. Its more like a faith than a religion. Big difference.

    22. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by po8 · · Score: 1

      YHBT. Check out the author's nick, for heaven's sake, not to mention the author's previous postings.

      Who the heck is modding these things?

    23. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Hardly,

      My arguments are more of an athiest (more so than an agnostic)...my arguments say make up your own mind as to what you want to do than to say you will follow these commandments (as put forward by both standard licensings schemes as well as OSS GPL). It allows you do to what you want with it.

      Its about choice. Religion says you are either for a particular god or you are for their specific satan. Bushie says you are either with us or you are for the terrorists. Etc...

      Its not forcing a mandate down your throat. Its telling you that you can choose either.

      I don't know where all the idiots get off telling me that choice is a bad thing. I like GPL for a lot of reasons...most of them having to do with the fact I can force others into not making a proffit off my work (at least not without releveling the playing field and giving me back the changes). I like standard copyright because it protects my works from folks forcing me to give away the source. I love BSD because it says fuck this shit...do what they fuck you want to do, I don't care.

      It depends on what you want or need at the time. Those of us that are a little more open know this. I am a software developer by trade. I've released applications in all of these (as well as straight public domain). Each one has a specific reason as to why I released it that way...mostly to protect *MY* interests. If it happens to be something that benefits my customers, I'm happy for that as well (though I generally only OS software that I do not want to support any more...let someone else read though and edit the software...unlike most OS programmers, at least I know how to comment :-)

    24. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by crayiii · · Score: 1

      I can think of many many better distro's that would be better than Debian to introduce new users to. Fedora, Suse, Mandrake, Knoppix, Lindows (yes, I know the last 2 are Debian based). Hand them a set of Debian CD's and they aren't likely to enjoy their first day with Linux.

    25. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Foomatic. I still don't know what the hell it does, just cause I can't get passed the name.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    26. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are a dumbass. FreeBSD has spread no FUD. What you have is a end user who took the Free portion out of the word FreeBSD and took it to their own level of meaning. The fact of the matter is, end users are responsible for their own education and their own understanding of what is free, what is open, and what is corporate america. You can cry FUD all you want because somebody was interested in something other than Linux, but it isn't very accurate.

    27. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by StuartFreeman · · Score: 1

      I'm getting tired of ogg always being the example of a bad name because it doesn't jump out and scream music. I bet if you ask people on the street what an mp3 is you will find a lot of them know. How about ebay and amazon not descriptive but they work. It's all about marketing. Granted descriptive names help the user when they don't have a clue, but then you can just use google or yahoo to get a clue!

      --
      This is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine...
    28. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      Ya know that if you had gone by what your friend wanted and installed FreeBSD, you would have been installing an OS instead of a religion.

      Whoah, you must know some different FreeBSD-users than I do...

      Some of the ones I know always start religious license wars on "how much better the BSD license is" and so on, and not just discussion, they're as good as flaming.

      Dammit, I like BSD, and I think Matt Dillon, Theo DeRaadt and the others ("rivals" as they are) have a lot of interesting things to say. It's just some of the zealous, elitist scrubby users that give it a bad name. (Don't worry, I won't apply my dislike for that to the system itself, or all of its fans, just some.)

      Having said that, I *LOVE* Max OSX and I don't think it would have come out if it was simply Linux with the Aqua Interface as opposed to BSD with the same.

      Well, Darwin is no BSD-kernel and the Apple license is no BSD-license. Complain about the GPL all you want, but at least it allows free redistribution and modification. A bit more hassle than the (new, no-ad-clause) BSD license, sure, but it's not totally off-limits like, say, Apple's Quartz.

      Peace, drop the religious wars, it's all good.
    29. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Whoa - your friend just proved that despite the efforts of IBM, Red Hat and others to defend Linux against the FUD being spread by its competitors, that some of it is still getting through to the enduser. Her comment about Linux being swallowed by the corporations is a frightening one, and proves (at least to me) that we need to be much more proactive when it comes to explaining the philosophy and history of the Linux distribution, so that people don't continue to make this mistake in their thinking.

      The story is a fantasy. Look at the nick. It's a troll.

      However if that story was true, I would suggest you explain the cost of Linux. The history and philosophy is not interesting to most people. The $0 cost will get their attention.

    30. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      GIMP: Dont want no leather clad prevert gettin medeival on my ass.

      God I wish I had thought of that one, lol.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    31. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I think foomatic is for printing, drivers and such. I use linux for servers, but not print servers, so not positive about that tho

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    32. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      It's all about marketing. Granted descriptive names help the user when they don't have a clue, but then you can just use google or yahoo to get a clue!

      But that IS marketing. Making people want your product, and using the name effectively. Granted, OSS authors don't sweat the marketability of the name as much as those of us who do marketing for a living, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the name DOES affect acceptance in a significant way.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    33. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by hdparm · · Score: 1

      I'm sure she would have been more than happy if he installed FreeWilly.

    34. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing what a religion is, here. It doesn't necessarily involve forcing it upon others.

      And any belief system that involves faith is a religion.

      To get back on topic here, from what I'm seeing on slashdot, BSD is turning into something with far more religious-like zealotry than the GPL, and I don't really understand why.

      The purpose for chosing a GPL release seems obvious to me - if I write code, and want to make it freely available for someone else to use, I can GPL it, and anyone is free to use it - the price they pay is that they must make the code they add to it freely available as well. While I won't necessarily gain money, I will gain code if someone wants to extend my code.

      The purpose for choosing BSD seems less obvious to me. If I release something under BSD, I'm giving it away, someone is free to use it and extend it, but I get nothing at all from that. The theory I suppose is that they will see that I've been nice and they will also be nice - but they are under no obligation to do so, and the reality has shown that the large corporations that use BSD code frequently don't release code in return.

      I just can't quite see the motivation in giving large companies a free gift.

    35. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by clifyt · · Score: 1

      You aren't giving large corporations a free gift. You are giving EVERYONE a free gift.

      Think about it like having a child. If someone said they'd have a child only if they could control this child for the rest of their lives and enforce decisions on it, you'd think that person was pretty f'd up.

      Not all of us think of it as being ripped off if someone takes something we've put out there and uses it and ends up making a buck off of it. On /. you hear on average about once a month some OSS developer going nutty because someone takes a GPL'd product and deciding to do something with it that they didn't want. What was it last? Some company was making a hardware firewall, the creator of the software put GPL'd software out, the company used it pretty much intact and put back the minor changes as required by the GPL, but didn't plaster this guys name all over the site and he decided to close the project.

      We've heard this over the FINK software on the Mac...the programmer does all the work, and someone puts up the compiled versions of these apps (along with the source) and he threatens to quit because they are making money and his name is no where to be found except in the licensing agreements.

      Thats just damn immature.

      I'm not saying all GPL programmers are immature, or even a majority of them are. What I'm saying is that it takes a different mindset to say that someone will put out software, give away the source and let you do as you please without further restrictions.

      The arguements for GPL are that you can learn from others. You can still learn from BSD...a good majority of those that use this software contribute back. Not everyone, but most. The biggest company backing BSD is Apple -- they sell more machines with a BSD backing than anyone (well, ignoring the network stack from Win2k+), yet they have no problem resubmitting code to the core programmers.

      Its this licensing that made Apple the biggest unix vendor in the world (measured in workstations and servers). If the biggest vendor can do this and contribute, I don't see the problem (other than folks complain the Aqua layers aren't OS).

      So, the fact that you are not obligated to do anything is the plus. Those that respect the software WILL contribute. And having a requirement to contribute doesn't leave GPL'd software any safer. Quite a few installers and configuration apps and helper programs are closed source and interact readily with these apps almost as closely as if the app were LGPL'd.

      Again, its all about choice to me. Not a religion to me -- I'm just enjoying the arguement. I use as much GPL'd software as I do BSD'd and standard copyrightted stuff like M$ Office. I just know which one I respect more.

    36. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Felis+Rex · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, whatever works, right? FreeBSD and Debian are in many ways similar. On the other hand, apt can't be all that different from the package management tools FreeBSD offers. You sound like you're reprimanding your friend because she dared to think outside the Linux box! Personally, I run Windows, Linux and FreeBSD. I used to be a Linux zealot. Now, Linux sees use only for those times when I need to back up my FreeBSD partition. And Windows... well, you can't create Neverwinter Nights modules under Linux or FreeBSD. In my experience, it's just easier to install and uninstall software under FreeBSD, and easier to maintain the system. Who cares if Linux distros are losing out because they don't have "free" in their names? Linux is oretty well known by now. The question is, are *BSDs losing out because of people like you? There's room for Linux and FreeBSD.

      --
      "it's only after disaster that you can be born resurected" - My friend Dave
  9. Target Acquired by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything. . .

    Rain?

    KFG

    1. Re:Target Acquired by Artifex · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything. . .


      Rain?


      Funny you should say that. Portland's average rainfall when I moved there was 2 inches less per year than Dallas, where I was moving from - it's just that Dallas only got a few storms a year, whereas Portland has a nice little drizzle at least weekly. I miss that weather.

      I was laid off from my network engineering job there in 2002, and had to move back to Texas. But if Portland is finally really becoming an IT hotbed ("Silicon Forest," and all that), I'd gladly move back. (Anyone wanting someone with Juniper/Cisco carrier-level experience and training, respond to this post :) )
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    2. Re:Target Acquired by looie · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything. . .

      Rain?

      actually, it rains a lot more in seattle than in pdx. 36" avg annual rainfall in seattle, 28" avg annual rainfall in portland.

      mp

      --
      "The secret to strong security: less reliance on secrets." -- Whitfield Diffie
    3. Re:Target Acquired by kfg · · Score: 1

      It's what the Irish refer to as "soft" weather. And yes, in moderation at least it can be quite pleasant and it keeps the climate overall moderate, like the Irish.

      KFG

    4. Re:Target Acquired by kfg · · Score: 1

      I know, but the story didn't mention Seattle. I have to work with whatever shoddy material the straightman feeds me.

      KFG

    5. Re:Target Acquired by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 1

      KFG

      Kentucky Fried Goat? Gerbil?

      Just wondering, please ignore :)

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    6. Re:Target Acquired by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      Surrealistic multilingual bands ?

      Chorus to Pink Martini's Sympathique:
      "Je ne veux pas travailler / Je ne veux pas dejeuner / Je veux seulement oublier / Et puis je fume"

      Which means:
      "I don't want to work
      I don't want to have lunch
      I just want to forget
      And I smoke, too"

      Those guys are great musicians, but I do hope the one who wrote that song is not part of a local Linux internationalization group...

      Thomas Miconi

    7. Re:Target Acquired by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Tax measures?

    8. Re:Target Acquired by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      Got you all beat. I live in Orlando and our annual average is around 45" a year. Lightning storms like crazy to boot. But, honestly, the "bad" weather is just about the only part of Florida that I actually find "good." There's nothing more soothing than I nice, long thunderstorm...

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    9. Re:Target Acquired by howe_bpm · · Score: 1

      Portland? Not a "Ground Zero" for anything? excuse me while I gasp, and clutch my chest in pain at the thought. There's a certain little comic strip, penciled in Portland that laid the foundation for one my (and I'll assume a whole bunch of /.ers) favorite cartoons, in the world, ever. You meet me in Portland, down on Quimby St, and I'll take you on a little tour of Matts' hometown. jh

  10. Simplistic but well written. by Artega+VH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure there are small things (not a GNU/Linux in sight) which will probably be the cause of much criticism here but for an INTRODUCTION to Linux, and a brief update on the who SCO joke I thought it was rather well done.

    At least it didn't leave me thinking: "What idiots wrote this garbage..."

    Kudo's to a small newspaper standing up the /. effect too... :D

    --
    groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
  11. Tux not copyrighted? by Guiri · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:

    The Tux cartoon is not copyrighted--anyone can use it for free

    Does that mean that any company (SCO, M$) could copyright the Tux logo and we won't be able to use it anymore?

    1. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by ianezz · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK, the copyright on Tux belongs to its author, Larry Lewing (he doesn't explicitly states that, but art works are copyrighted by default, right?), who then granted permission to everyone to use/modify it, provided he and The Gimp are acknowledged.

    2. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by ianezz · · Score: 1

      Pardon for the typo, the correct name is Larry Ewing.

    3. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is copyrighted. However, the license is extremely liberal: see the Linux Penguins page for details.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    4. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, due to copyright law and automatic copyrights (he didn't state copyright, but it's there, except for where he explicitly gave some rights away), but they could copyright a modification.

      From his site:
      Feel free to do whatever you see fit with the images, you are encouraged to integrate them into other designs that fit your need.

    5. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something has to be original to qualify for a copyright.

      Microsoft couldn't just take a Tux created by somebody else and have a valid claim to a copyright on it.

    6. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by base3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not, but it does lend itself to some, um, interesting uses.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    7. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      From the article:
      The Tux cartoon is not copyrighted--anyone can use it for free

      Does that mean that any company (SCO, M$) could copyright the Tux logo and we won't be able to use it anymore?

      The Tux logo is copyrighted. Larry just has a royalty-free unlimited license arrangement with ... well, everybody.

      It's the same with Linux. The article says it is owned by nobody. Linux is owned by lots of people. The copyright notices are all over the place. But the Linux license grants royalty-free copying.

    8. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      Abso-bleepin-lootly not. Larry Ewing created the image, and if someone tried to copyright it they would have a very hard time proving it was their original work. Case in point: MAD Magazine popularized the loveable idiot we know as Alfred E. Newman, but never copyrighted or trademarked his image. In fact in the 1960s they went to great lengths to show that variations of the picture dated back to the turn of the 20th century, because someone else was trying to sue them in a claim that they held the copyright to the image. (MAD won the case). In an early manifestation of the Groklaw Effect, MAD asked its readers to submit copies of the picture for evidence in the lawsuit, which was how they came up with the prior art.

      So presumably you could use Alfred, or Tux, to sell shampoo or emblazon the cover of your garage band's CD without any reference to MAD or Linux. But if you ask me, it would be less than ethical to do so.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    9. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by zsau · · Score: 1

      You can't copyright what isn't yours, or you don't have whoever's it was permission.

      --
      Look out!
  12. Anything would be better than.... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Interesting



    Any effort to familliarize the public with Linux that doesn't involve a creepy-looking 9 year old with yellow hair has my support.

    That, and anything that doesn't involve Laverne talking about "chaos theory"..sheesh.

    What the hell would be so wrong about simply putting a few kernel/distrib contributors infront of a camera, and letting them talk for 30 seconds? "Hi, I'm Dave. I wrote the part of Linux that makes this camera work. I did it because it's fun....and because the manufacturer wouldn't." Sure, most of us are pretty damn ugly but there's gotta be a few photogenic nerds among us. With good stories, too.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Anything would be better than.... by darnok · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Sure, most of us are pretty damn ugly but there's
      > gotta be a few photogenic nerds among us. With
      > good stories, too.

      No, there aren't, at least not to Joe Average.

      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

    2. Re:Anything would be better than.... by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1

      Some might be photogenic. Some of those may have good stories. I just wonder how many of those will *also* want to talk about it in front of a camera. After all, as you say, they usually do it because it's fun and don't really care whether the public is familiar with it or not (and sadly some *do* care that the public is *not* familiar). But this is changing...

      --
      The revolution will not be televised.
    3. Re:Anything would be better than.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Funny
      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

      Excellent. Now we just need a volunteer...

      --
      Evan "My SO and I had a long debate about photon/electron interaction tonight. I'm not giving that up for some overrated actress"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Anything would be better than.... by m00nun1t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then the BSD demon would need a new place to live - his home would be frozen over.

    5. Re:Anything would be better than.... by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

      It would be easier to have Ben Affleck learn how to write device drivers.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    6. Re:Anything would be better than.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OUCH! That is hilarious, good one.

      So are you saying that sleeping with J Lo is like sleeping in a BioHazard area?

      Peace.

    7. Re:Anything would be better than.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

      For the good of the community I volunteer.

      Is J-Lo free as in beer or free as in freedom?

    8. Re:Anything would be better than.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Reposted from another story:

      Too bad more vendors don't equip their consumer-level PCs with those plug-in drive trays - $20 extra? - (of course, that would create a whole other set of problems though) and offer a free, additional limited trial of Linux or another OS simply by plugging-in a different HD-in-a-tray. Don't like it/too complicated? Shut down, put the Windows tray back in, re-boot and return the smaller capacity disk and tray for a refund.

      Case manufacturers now offer slide-out motherboard trays and flexible mounting options for other internals. Would a HD tray be a huge additional cost?

    9. Re:Anything would be better than.... by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that while it's a great idea to put contributors up on TV and give the layperson's description of Linux together...that promotes OpenSource, and Linux, but not specifically a Linux from a certain company. So....who's gonna pay for it ??

      The reason why the Aryan child is on TV is because IBM pays for it. Who's going to pay for TV time, forget about prime-time broadcast costs ? RedHat ? GNU ? I doubt it.

      again...it's a good idea, but it's not going to happen.

    10. Re:Anything would be better than.... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

      Well, I hear Ben and her are on the rocks.

      So, Wil, are you reading today? :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    11. Re:Anything would be better than.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to offer my services :)

  13. Luki by Elektroschock · · Score: 4, Informative

    Luki.org, a German organisation for the spread of the word of Linux in Christian Churches, created a very good "Uberzeugungsmappe", a convincement paper for Joe Enduser. It is slightly outdated and probably not available in English but you could try to tranlate it via Babelfish and correct the mistakes.

    Download the German paper in OpenOffice Format or as pdf. More about the Luki-Organisation in English

    It would be very helpful to get an English translation of this very good LUKI "Uberzeugungsmappe" paper

    1. Re:Luki by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      That would be an excellent idea - have you tried advertising this on some of the more general-purpose mailinglists and forums to see if anyone would be willing to do a translation?

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:Luki by Mard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      a German organisation for the spread of the word of Linux in Christian Churches

      Talk about a limited target audience... sheesh.

      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
  14. repeat story by flyingdisc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't this a repeat of a story put up a month or so ago? I had a quick look on the old articles and couldn't find it but I have a strong sense of deja vu.

    1. Re:repeat story by modnoah · · Score: 1

      Well the willamete week article was published on the 28th... so ... probably not.

      Unless, of course, you wrote the article for WW... then, by all means, continue to feel an odd sense of familiarity with this story.

  15. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by bj8rn · · Score: 4, Funny
    These are hard numbers and 100% FACTS! There are several more where these came from

    Aye, I tried smashing them with a wooden hammer, but after a few hits, the sodden thing was in pieces! Then I tried a bigger one, but to no avail. Then I decided to test my brand new diamond-head drill, but it wouldn't even leave a mark on these numbers! "Bloody hell," I said. And threw the numbers into a furnace. And when I took them out, they were bloody hot (I almost lost my left thumb because of a number 5) and there were some weird markings to be seen on them -- I guess my diamond-head drill still did some damage ;7

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  16. The argument's wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It should be titled: Introducing Linux to Joe User.

    Linux is still a techies OS. Any headway made swinging it into the mainstream is by Linux bending towards what the user wants (Start Menus etc.), not by bending the public at large (i.e. not us) towards Linux.

    1. Re:The argument's wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Linux is still a techies OS."

      Mandrake 9.2 is easier to use than Windows.

    2. Re:The argument's wrong... by mwilliamson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Linux is a techie OS because it works, and works well, and works with minimal fuss. These attributes, as well as a constantly-improving UI will push it into the mainstream. The fact that it is a techie OS should not deter Joe User.

      While linux is a strong techie's OS, it's also reached the point of being less of a pain in the arse to install and maintain than windows. Windows is such a pain in the arse to install that, if not for the fact it's usually pre-installed or supplied as a ghost image, most end users would have considerable difficulty installing.

      It is possible to have a fully operational Fedora box in as little as 15 - 30 minutes that will keep itself updated. Everything that needs configuration can be done right from the GUI nowadays, from partitioning to building your firewall. You can make a kickstart disk to carry your efforts in package selection to other machines. You need not face an interrogation every damned time you change a major piece of hardware, or a few pieces of minor hardware.

      While the techie community is capable of using operating systems that are difficult to install (openBSD, Darwin-i386 + Xfree86), the fact a good OS is easy to install/use/maintain will not drive them away.

    3. Re:The argument's wrong... by CatOne · · Score: 1

      I agree here. In many schools, the teachers ARE the IT department. So we're often talking about 25 year old women who have only ever used computers to write last-minute papers.

      Think they can administer a network of 10 computers in a classroom?

      Really, In think Linux would be a helluva challenge in education, for example.

    4. Re:The argument's wrong... by catman · · Score: 1

      Think they can administer a network of 10 computers in a classroom?

      Really, In think Linux would be a helluva challenge in education, for example.


      Yes, I do. http://www.skolelinux.no (should appear in English if your browser gives that as your preference) Teachers report that now they can go back to teaching and use far less time maintaining the computers and the network.

      The SLX project is about file/print servers and terminal servers, with selected educational programs - and using LTSP thin clients. "It just works."

    5. Re:The argument's wrong... by CatOne · · Score: 1

      Good God it's not even launched yet.

      REALLY, you think fiddling with a v 0.95 of Linux is what a teacher's going to want to do?

      Not to mention, none of the computers in the classroom will run ANY of the apps they want to run (which run on the Mac and now on PCs).

      C'mon. You're not thinking like a teacher, you have a Linux hammer and think everything looks like a nail.

    6. Re:The argument's wrong... by mage100 · · Score: 1
      Many schools are going to linux to lower costs. Apparently you've never looked at k12linux or k12ltsp. K12Linux gives great advice about linux distros for schools. K12ltsp is a linux terminal server bundled with Fedora Core. Both projects have tons of documentation (newsgroups with techs, and non-techs, web pages, etc) and give you software that can open many proprietary formats. Many school districts that made the switch say that the students hardly notice the difference and administration is simple enough for one or two teachers to do.

      www.k12linux.org http://www.k12ltsp.org/

    7. Re:The argument's wrong... by catman · · Score: 1

      Good God it's not even launched yet.

      Not at version 1, no - still, 70 schools all over this little country are already using it. Apps?
      When the first trial version was demoed, teachers complained that there were TOO MANY apps on it.
      This is for education, not (yet) school administration - even if some of the trial schools are already using it as such.

      ... fiddling with a 0.95 version

      The software install is already down to 5
      questions - the goal is three. Webmin administration interface does not require a certification to operate.

      You're not thinking like a teacher -

      I may be thinking more like a principal who sees that he can hire more teachers with the money he saves. The teachers we've been talking to just love it.

      Final point: Norway, Sweden and Finland has about 20,000 Saami - whose children would like to use a computer system where they can actually read the GUI texts in their own language.

    8. Re:The argument's wrong... by foobar77 · · Score: 1
      Linux is best and most competitive as a server operating system. It is not yet ready for prime time on the desktop of non-techie users, including those of students at Portland and Riverdale. I think Paul and Scott of the article are speaking from the point of view of the IT techies, not from the point of view of those who have to use this stuff - sure it may cost them a bit less to install it, but if it isn't usable, the ROI isn't very good.

      My kids attend Portland schools with these Linux labs - they report they sit idle most of the time. Their applications aren't compatible with the wordprocessors, spreadsheets, presentations, etc that they use at home, so they can't move their work back and forth. The applications work different than the applications they have at home, and there are no classes to teach them how to use them. The teachers are even more clueless about these machines than the students. No one at the school knows anything about them, so if something goes wrong it takes days for someone to come out and fix it. When teachers can't count on this stuff, they can't design it into their curriculums. If our high school students & teachers can't handle this stuff, how in the world is joe-average going to manage?

      From what I understand Torvald, ODSL and the Linux community fully understand the desktop problem. I see various intentions for programs to improve Linux for the desktop. Some say this should be a priority for the 2.8 kernel. Gurus at last summer's Open Source Conference held in Portland estimated Linux might become a competitive non-techie desktop within about 5 years, but a lot of work is required to get us there.

      Linux's strengths are as a server. But as a server, it is primarily threatening Sun and other UNIX server vendors more than Microsoft. When you look at market share statistics, Linux server is growing, MS server is growing, UNIX whatever is shrinking. We are headed to a bipolar MS vs Linux world. Yes, MS should be concerned, but the story to date is how Linux is wiping out UNIX competitors. When Amazon says they are saving millions with Linux, it is because they rolled out the Suns, not Windows.

      Do you realize the irony (and potential danger) of IBM backing and potentially getting in front of the Linux parade?? IBM was the Microsoft of the world before there was a Microsoft!

  17. Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful



    I've heard so much about the so-called "Rebellion" whenever Linux is mentioned. Sometimes I gotta admit that I dunno what they are talking about.

    I use Linux not because I rebel against anyone, it's just that I got tired of the blue-screen-of-death cum you-gimme-more-$$$-and-we-still-won't-fix-the-bug thingy so I switched.

    No rebellion, just got tired with you-know-who.

    In other words, the "Rebellion" thingy may be overated.

    Just my thoughts, anyway.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've heard so much about the so-called "Rebellion" whenever Linux is mentioned. Sometimes I gotta admit that I dunno what they are talking about.

      A lot of Linux users think like you do... many also don't have anything particularly against Windows, they just like Linux better.

      However, Microsoft views this as a war, and is acting accordingly. Many Linux users realize this, and are fighting back, because sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    2. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . . . sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy.

      There has been violence? I must have missed that. Perhaps you are making the sort of conceptual mistake that Gandhi warned about, mistaking nonviolence with passivity.

      Nonviolence as a technique is often based on direct confrontation, even to the extent of provoking it.

      KFG

    3. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Well, but Linux and other Free Software play their important parts in the revolution, because they empower their users to emancipate themselves and be free of heteronomy.

      Also, the notion of sharing the software with your neighbor emphasizes the important aspect of solidarity in this world.

      Still, if you only use Linux because you like it better than Windows, more power to you. It only means that Linux does not have to compete on ideology, but that it can compete on merit alone. But be assured that the revolution is coming, nonetheless.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    4. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by HawkingMattress · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To me, there is a rebellion, but it's not about OSes, it's about freedom in the digital world.

      There really is a war going on between heavy capitalism, who tries to do all it can to restrict the use of everything digitally distribuable, and the people from the base, who have the skills to circumvent the rules, and organize hastily a counter attack to each offensives from the big boys.
      The point is, even Joe Sixpack, who doesn't care at all about the political or economical issues of modern technologies, is starting to understand when he sees he cannot play he's favorite mp3s in his xbox, or play the latests cds in his car stero and asks his tech savvy friends why this is.

      But that's nothing, what's important are the implications of such things in a world where everything will be digitalized.
      The technology, and the extensions we can try to forsee ten years from now can be the thing that will give the power back to the people, or the thing that will allow a control on us that even sci-fi books couldn't imagine.
      [ here fade in of terminator 1 music :)]

      And personnally, I first see Linux as a *nix system for x86, which allows me to play with UNIX on my laptop. But I also see it as a safe harbor where I can go when i'm fed up with corporate crap. Linux is people-centered, when you have a problem you just chat about it with some other users, or the developpers. Windows stinks corporatism everywhere, you know that the people on the other end want your money, not to help you, or to make things better. They'll lock you as soon as they can anyway. So in a sense to me linux is indeed a rebellion, a rebellion to fight the power of money, to circumvent the people I wish I could tell to go fsk themselves when I'm at work. If I can contribute to this little grain of sand in the wheel of capitalism, I'm all for it :)

    5. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

      Well said. - if a little exageratd.

    6. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Wellspring · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agreee. I think the counter-culture has been trying to adopt Linux as Member of the Movement. It's a little embarrassing.

      I have a friend who claims to be a geek. He can italicize and link in his livejournal. That's it. He put LimeWire proficiency on his resume to bulk out the "software" section. Yeah, yeah, I know in these enlightened times you can be a film geek, a music geek, a political geek, a goth club geek, or a football geek. In fact, virtually everyone has some kind of interest, so the word apparantly has no meaning anymore. Oh, and it used to be about the music. :)

      Bitter? Hell, yeah.

      Actually, political geeks are called policy wonks, and I'm one, and so I guess that puts me with the other hangers-on. But I'll brave that risk and say that any meaningful comparison of Linus to Che Guevara requires that Linus torture at least a dozen people to death.

      Failing that, Open Source is an economic, social and technological exercise. Political revolution is not on the menu, except maybe as a side project of some of our luminaries. Whose politics? (ESR? RMS? IBM?) Virtually any, apparantly.

      So I'd thank the drug-addled, media-obsessed non-programmers to stop trying to co-opt Linux into something that it isn't. I mean, seriously, go write a mission statement.

    7. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by anonicon · · Score: 1

      Yo K, thank you, and true. I have no idea how often I've heard people preaching nonviolent resistance when it was clear that they had a mental image of Buddhist passivity in their mind.

    8. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I remember a long time ago, Linus being quoted as saying the primary reason for creating Linux was because he couldn't afford a Sun workstation. Microsoft had nothing to do with it. In fact, Microsoft was nothing more than a blip in 1991.

    9. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo dude, why don't you quit posting for a while. It's reached the point I start looking for your posts because they are, too frequently, well, good. Totally fucks-up my slashdot reality.

    10. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the Willy Week article was pretty neat, and I really liked the cover picture. But, like you, I think "rebellion" is the wrong word for this.

      It seems to me that calling this a "rebellion" is underrating what is going on. The increasing acceptance of Linux and OSS in general is the visible manifestation of a major revolution-- in thought and culture. The idea that a thousand eyes makes all bugs shallow-- cooperative development of new software wealth-- is as astounding and revolutionary as the idea of standardized parts that brought about the industrial revolution, or the idea of empiric, repeatable observation that brought about the scientific revolution, or perhaps even that idea our distant ancestors had that you could contain a small bit of fire, keep it fed, and actually benefit from it...

      This revolution is not a thing of competition. You who choose OSS simply because those apps make your life better than the alternatives are actually right in the middle of the front lines and don't even know it. Which is the way it should be.

      The revolution will not be televised. But if you know what to look for, you can see plenty evidence of it on slashdot.

    11. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by kasperd · · Score: 1

      I use Linux not because I rebel against anyone, it's just that I got tired of the blue-screen-of-death...

      I use Linux because I needed something that would work nicely together with Unix. Being open source I figured I might as well start reading the source, and later I even started modifying it on my own. I became so happy with having access to the source, that now I don't want to give up on that. I was never a Microsoft user. Before I bought a computer for running Linux I used my Amiga 1200. Had Microsoft Office been available for AmigaOS ten years ago I might have used it. But not today. Latex just works better with CVS.

      I hate Microsoft, not because of Windows crashing all the time (since I don't use it), but rather because of all the problems they are responsible for. Whenever I see hardware or websites not working with Linux, I know Microsoft Windows is part of the reason.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    12. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There has been violence? I must have missed that.

      Dude, didn't you hear? SCO slapped IBM with a lawsuit!

    13. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      I use Linux not because I rebel against anyone, it's just that I got tired of the blue-screen-of-death cum
      you-gimme-more-$$$-and-we-still-won't-fix-the -bug thingy so I switched.


      Which means that, whether you realize it or not, whether you acknowledge it or not, you're part of the rebellion. Ninety-some percent of the world's PC desktops run some form of Windows, so they say. By using Linux you're going against this established order, and although you may not be standing outside Bill's office with a picket sign, I would say the switch is an act of rebellion.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    14. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There has been violence?

      Yuh. Did you miss it?

    15. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy. There has been violence? I must have missed that. Perhaps you are making the sort of conceptual mistake that Gandhi warned about, mistaking nonviolence with passivity. Maybe you could count the SCO system admins beating their heads on the sides of their servers after mydoom.a wiped them off the 'net.

    16. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy. There has been violence? I must have missed that. Perhaps you are making the sort of conceptual mistake that Gandhi warned about, mistaking nonviolence with passivity. Nonviolence as a technique is often based on direct confrontation, even to the extent of provoking it. Maybe you could count all those SCO system admins banging their heads on the sides of the company servers that MyDoom.a wiped off the web.

  18. Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by questamor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately for every good article there's another full of FUD about *ix systems. take this one

    "A new email virus called MyDoom is spreading rapidly across the Internet through UNIX mail servers, bringing with it a dangerous attachment that, when opened, can give attackers access to users' computers through an electronic backdoor."

    Amazing what they'll print these days? unix systems, one of the systems so amazingly resistant to worms like mydoom, and still we have the press implying they're to blame for the spread of windows viruses.

    1. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      spreading rapidly across the Internet through UNIX mail servers

      Well, of course. You can't expect exchange to be powerful enough to meet the email demand. You need a quality, robust unix server!

    2. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an electronic backdoor eh? there was me thinking this virus installs real backdoors.. can anyone photoshop a picture of this to go along with the 'article'?

    3. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      This is the same Unix that SCO claims ownership of?

      HH
      --

    4. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      unix systems, one of the systems so amazingly resistant to worms like mydoom, and still we have the press implying they're to blame for the spread of windows viruses.

      You know, the Windows fans are always the first to blame Sendmail if there happens to be a bug in it. (Typical *NIX fan reply is a gigantic yawn and something along the lines of "switch to Qmail or Postfix already, dammit, those things are already time-tested".)

      In this case, they're just jealous that most of the E-mail - including viruses - on the Internet is carried by Sendmail, and they can't blame it for this viral outbreak. The logic goes like this: "My operating system is vulnerable - but if those darn Sendmail servers didn't carry those E-mails to my inbox, I wouldn't have anything to worry!" Logical, huh?

    5. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by SiGiN · · Score: 2, Informative

      More articles of same author (Paul Thurrott):
      here

      And here is thurrott@winnetmag.com his addy, in case u wanna say "hello" ;-)

    6. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Funny

      He does have a point.

      If every mail server on the internet ran Windows, e-mail would never work well enough to function as the vector for a worm.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    7. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's an old old old joke my father used to tell me when we were all out camping. It was a bonding time, between parent and child. You know those moments, when essential truths about the world are passed down. And he'd say to me:

      "How can you tell when Paul Thurrott is being a biased, lying windows Shill?"

      the punchline... oh and I used to wait for this one and laugh

      "His lips are moving!"

      and we'd cackle together around the fire, and eat another marshmallow.

    8. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty dumb yes, but at the same time, it's not hard to build an email server with virus filtering built into it. It costs all of about $300 for a server license from most antivirus vendors, and there's free virus scanners available as well.

      As much as I think Windows blows goats, if you're putting an email server on the net I think it's the admin's responsability to ensure it doesn't propogate viruses. I put implementing virus scanning on the same level as making sure you're not running an open relay. It wasn't always like this but that's the climate we operate in now.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    9. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Ann+Elk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blaming the "UNIX mail servers" for spreading MyDoom is like blaming the USPS for spreading anthrax.

    10. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father is dead. I never had any of those moments, you insensitive clod!

    11. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by SkArcher · · Score: 4, Informative

      Clam Antivirus is a GPL anti-virus scanner that can be set to scan all passing mail.

      Oh, and it was the first AV software to have a working definition of MyDoom (which they labeled "Worm.SCO.A") - faster than all of the commercial antivirus vendors.

      Chalk another one up for Open Software. Working together you can analyse virus code faster!

      Well shit, who would have thought it...

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    12. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats ok, I made it all up. I'm allergic to marshmallows anyway

    13. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by millette · · Score: 1
      I read it somewhat like that too.

      Or even more devious, the author knows that most email and web is being server by unix derivatives, so he's only admitting that - but to the masses, he just pointed the finger at the culprit, the poor messenger.

    14. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by cpghost · · Score: 1

      it's not hard to build an email server with virus filtering built into it.

      Think of back-scatter: when a virus hits a mail server, and the server bounces the message (to the forged sender address), innocent bystanders will get the virus too. And since big MTAs with lots of traffic run on Unix, they can potentially generate a lot of back-scatter... So very indirectly, poorly configured virus filters can worsen the virus problem; wether they're running on Unix or not.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    15. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Its nice to see an Open Source virus scanner, but it would be nicer to have a Windows version. Sure, if you run a mail server in unix that would be great, but most "Average Joe" windows users do not and will most likely get infected.

      --
      Sig it.
    16. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but I find scanning files under Linux to be much safer than Windows. That way there is no change of something accidentally getting run.

      But I mostly run Windows in VMware with the occasional app in Wine...

    17. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      yep, on the first day of the worm, we caught 2800 copies of the thing with our clam scanner.

    18. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by double-oh+three · · Score: 3, Funny

      /*Chalk another one up for Open Software. Working together you can analyse virus code faster! */

      No, you analyse it just as slow as the other vendors, it's just that one of the analysts wrote the damn thing. ;)

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    19. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by udippel · · Score: 1

      Firstly, there are.

      But more importantly: your post doesn't make kind of sense:
      "Sure, if you run a mail server in unix that would be great, but most "Average Joe" windows users do not"
      How's this sentence to close ? The only possible alternative: "... run a mail server at all".
      And thereby we're out of sense.

      It's the *client* that works a vector, not the server. ICYDK.

    20. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by bbhack · · Score: 1

      Uh, there is no such think as an "email virus". You are using MS speak.

      --
      The next thing to remember is to put next things next.
    21. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by RealityThreek · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it was just a miscommunication. After reading the comments on that article, I noticed Paul Thurott says that the virus originated from a Unix mail server. He apologized for the way it was worded.

      Before getting out the tar and feathers, remember that we're just as bad about posting before knowing all the facts. ;)

      --
      :wq
    22. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by kasperd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think of back-scatter: when a virus hits a mail server, and the server bounces the message (to the forged sender address)

      For that exact reason I advice people to have the send an error message at once rather than first accept the email and then produce a bounce message. If your mailserver send an error message at the end of DATA, the error message is send directly to the worm. So no mail server will ever produce a bounce in that case.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    23. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      And you are using geek-speak. A virus that targets Microsoft systems but is transmitted via email is an "email virus" to most people. Bickering over semantics doesn't help the issue.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    24. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. Mail scanners should quietly destroy the virus infected message, logging it for admin review purposes. Amavis-new for example has such options, and I'd imagine others do too.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    25. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      "Firstly, there are".

      Actually, there are not. You saying there are Open Source Virus Scanners for windows, does not make it so. Please direct me to one.

      Secondly, from ClamAv's website: "The main purpose of this software is the integration with mail servers (attachment scanning). "

      Hey, how about that! A mail SERVER! Back to my original post.

      --
      Sig it.
    26. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by udippel · · Score: 1

      You must be a lawyer; more than a technician.

      You start with Joe Sixpack and the mailserver on his PC; when I advise you that there isn't (and shouldn't) be any mailserver on Joe's Windows PC, you suddenly pull an OSS virus-scanner out of your sleeves and link its existance as scanner for mail servers to a presumed existance of a mail server on a Windows client.
      You find me out of my wits.

      Get a life and port Clamav to Windows; so that Joe can run it against his non-existent mail server.

    27. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Didn't realize trolls kept up on their responses. Interesting.

      --
      Sig it.
  19. Re:It's official by siphi · · Score: 0

    Maybe he should try broadband. He can go googleyed faster! Or get a protective screen for his monitor.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  20. And I farked that up good and proper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be titled: Introducing Joe Average to Linux.

    The articles in the title should be reversed now. Excuse my flu and tiredness...

  21. How about "It's free. It works. Duh." by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (That would make a good slogan...)

  22. Screw the edict of worms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    For some, the rivalry is about more than software. "This thing," says one Portland observer, "is like Protestants and Catholics debating theology."

    Maybe that Portland read this on slashdot about a year ago, heh.

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 19, @12:00AM About 500 years ago, a guy named Martin Luther decided to translate the Bible into German, thus was born the Protestant revolution. The point being, that before this, if you were German and could not read Latin, you had to have a priest translate the words of God AKA the Bible.

    A Brit named William Tyndale had the same idea, he printed 50 copies of the Bible *in English*, the establishment was that shocked at this idea, they burnt him at the stake. Probably because they thought the idea of the common people having direct access to the 'holy writ' would lead to them thinking for themselves and having dangerous ideas.

    How like the current debate between open source and closed source this all sounds. Just substitute operating system for Bible, money for God, the stock market for the Holy Roman Empire and Bill Gates as the Pope and it all lines up!

  23. BSD? by berkut1337 · · Score: 1

    Have they tried and had the same success with *BSD ;) ?

  24. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this post-Adequacy world, deliberately mis-spelling words will instantly discredit you. Does Mike Bouma, widely respected Amigan, know you're posting this drivel with his name attached?

  25. Whole article on one page by shfted! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Using a little hack called page five of a four page story:

    http://www.willametteweek.com/story.php?story=4764 &page=5

    --
    He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    1. Re:Whole article on one page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow Does that work for most other online articles?

    2. Re:Whole article on one page by thestarz · · Score: 1

      That's just page one again. It loops.

      --

      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    3. Re:Whole article on one page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth.. I cannot come up with a technique manifesting a bug like this. Hidden feature perhaps?

    4. Re:Whole article on one page by goldfndr · · Score: 1

      Or you could just look at the print edition - don't be fooled by
      <a href="#" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('print.php?story=4764','' , 'scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=500,height=650 ')">

      --
      Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    5. Re:Whole article on one page by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that doesn't demonstrate a lack of checking input values in the story page, which I think is more interesting that parsing javascript gimmickery :)

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  26. Amusing quote by 3Daemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "IBM's endorsement of Linux has added credibility and an illusion of support and accountability," Ballmer wrote.

    So, backing from a huge corporation only gives an illusion of support and accountability, by Ballmers own admission? Something to keep in mind next time "corporate backing" is flounted as a Windows highlight :)

  27. remove the "Duh" by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "It's free. It works."

    a better slogan i think :)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  28. "the mark of cred" by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Funny
    "It's all about what a friend of mine calls 'the mark of cred,'" says Accardi, a Portland State grad who works as a Linux developer at Intel. "You either have it, or you don't."
    I think I probably don't have it, and I'm thinking that's a good thing too.

    Or maybe Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds will turn out to have been switched at birth, and will have to swap places, because it's discovered that the wrong one has "The Mark of Cred" (dun dun DUUUNNNNN!)
  29. Rain keeps the air clean. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Slugs? Ducks?

    1. Re:Rain keeps the air clean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BOOO! Death to Ducks!! Ducks blow!
      (and i'm at UO)

    2. Re:Rain keeps the air clean. by TPFH · · Score: 1

      I suppose there are Beavers too.
      But we seem to have more squirles than anything.
      (I don't normally run into too many slugs.)

      Oh, and the opossums! How can you forget the opossums?

      --
      This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  30. Unlikely places to read about open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    On a recent United Airlines flight I came across one of the more unlikely places to read on open source: that bastion of the most bland journalism imaginable: the inflight magazine. Generally I only look in the magazine to see what movies might be playing, so I was surprised that the current issue of Hemispheres Magazine has an article on Mitch Kapor, Chandler, and the Open Source Applications Foundation. It's not perfect, but pretty good for an inflight magazine.

  31. Part of Intel research is in Portland, also. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Portland is also the home of 6 semiconductor fabrication plants that Intel uses to test development processors.

  32. quote by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1

    great article. i particularly like this quote
    "It's free, It works, Duh!"
    Snappy catchphrase, don't ya think?
    Pretty snappy chorus for a rock song as well.

  33. Why People Don't Like Linux... by severoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've talked to several non-linux users about why they don't use it, and I'm not talking about the die-hard MS supporters. I'm talking about people that have tried it at one time or another, ran it for a while, and just gave up on it.

    Why did they give up instead of switching over to it as their primary desktop? Answers ranged over several salient (if not because they're real, at least because they're perceived) problems.

    Die-hard linux people see variety as a good thing. That's true, and it's not true. Variety always has to be put in context, especially if there's a lot of it. Here's an example that even die-hard linux people can understand (assuming you're not chefs too). Let's say I'm making salsa and I send you to the store to pick up some heat. You don't know the first thing about peppers, and it just so happens I live next to a produce mart the likes of which you've never seen before. To choose from are: jalapenos, habaneros, anaheim, chipotle, ancho, pablano, thai, serrano, scotch bonnet, etc. What are you likely to do? That's right--grab the jalapenos, cuz that's what you've heard of before, even though they're probably not the best solution. Some die-hard linux people would argue, hey, if your goal is to help your buddy out, you'll head over to your favorite bookstore and read up, and then head back to the produce mart armed with this newfound knowledge. To these people I say, you are truly a die-hard fan of linux if you didn't get this point.

    This is the pressure novices feel at every turn with linux, not just from what OS to install, but what is the install process? (Depends on the distro you've chosen.) How do I install an application? (Ibid.) Which application do I install if I want, say, an email client? (Good luck wading through all of the available options.) Why is it that everytime I head over to my buddy's house, he always knows about all this crap that I've never heard of, and he's got this smokin' setup that I wouldn't have the first clue how to begin assembling? How does one even keep up with all the choice that's available?

    All frustrations that don't happen with Windows. You only rarely head over to a buddy's and see him running Mozilla instead of IE and think, hmm, I'd like that and didn't know about it. 99% of the time, you're both running the same media player, picture editor, etc, and if you're not, there's only a small handful of well-known choices to choose from.

    The next barrier to installing/using linux on a long-term basis with these folks is what I call the annoyance/showstopper problem. Eventually, usually sooner than later, these people run into something that's either really annoying (they can't get X to run at a desired resolution, for example), or a really serious problem that impedes their ability to move forward (they can't connect to the web). They also don't really know where to look for help, or even how to find out where they should start. I myself ran into a problem years ago with RedHat, I simply wanted to upgrade the asteroids game, but the web of library dependencies that had to also be updated made it hardly worthwhile. Eventually, I rolled up my sleeves and got to work--I finally got to the end of a long dependency chain and discovered that, no matter what I did to upgrade this particular library, it wouldn't go in because it was replacing a basic graphics library that is used by virtual terminals. Because it was always in use, it couldn't be replaced, even in single-user mode. So I know this frustration well...even I was asking, how great can this OS be if a simple game can't easily be upgraded, and then it turns out when you finally commit yourself to an afternoon of hunting, it simply can't be upgraded at all? The bigger issue here for most users is, why should I have to know about library dependencies to upgrade a game, why are virtual terminals relevant to the problem I'm having, and what is a virtual terminal anyway? (The point is, whatever it is, it's totally unrelated to what I was trying to do, and most people find t

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      Sir, you have NAILED IT!!!

      IMO your description of your experiences and thoughts on this matter is exactly the sort of material that the developers of the Linux desktop and distro need to see. You need to get a website somewhere, put this up and point people to it - this mini-essay should NOT get lost in the bowels of Slashdot.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fredrikj · · Score: 1

      Very well written. Thanks.

    3. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by gorlok · · Score: 0

      Very well done!

    4. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by bangular · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of your points are valid, some are not.

      You mentioned installing Linux. How many average users do you know that installed their version of windows rather than bought it with it on there already? Most of those people wouldn't be able to install windows. The fact is, for so called "n00b" distro's, the installion process is in fact easier and quicker than windows. Some such as Lindows and Mandrake can be installed onto a new computer with just a couple of steps and nothing more than pressing next. PC's bundled with Linux and linux friendly hardware alieve this problem completely.

      RPM's are shitty and are the cause of more problems than they are worth. RPM's should have been done away with long ago. I remember as a noob, same problems. Could never install RPM's because of dependencys. I think distro's should adopt a portage style package system. Compiling from source takes longer, but it takes care of idiotic linking issues that RPM's create.

      I think most of Linux's entry level issues will be solved when OEM's start shipping it more included. The reason Linux on the desktop at the office is a great canidate is because it's installed for the workers and they've got someone to help them get past their entry level issues. Which are minor, but can be a big deal to new users.

    5. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by KermitJunior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've run into five people in tha past two weeks and asked them, "Ever tried Linux?" Strangely they all said something like, "Yeah, but it doesn't do what I need." Me: "Oh really, when was it you tried it?" Them: "About five years ago."

      I think one major problem Linux faces is that Joe Average can't comprehend the speed that Linux has been changing with. Five years ago, you had Win98, which looked a felt a lot like Win95 which still strongly acts like WinXP in many areas.

      So if MS has been pretty much even in almost 10 years of OS, they assume Linux works like it did 5 years ago.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    6. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, I'll bite. :) I think you're overcomplicating the matter, although you made a lot of good points.

      You don't know the first thing about peppers, and it just so happens I live next to a produce mart the likes of which you've never seen before. To choose from are: jalapenos, habaneros, anaheim, chipotle, ancho, pablano, thai, serrano, scotch bonnet, etc. What are you likely to do? That's right--grab the jalapenos, cuz that's what you've heard of before, even though they're probably not the best solution. Some die-hard linux people would argue, hey, if your goal is to help your buddy out, you'll head over to your favorite bookstore and read up, and then head back to the produce mart armed with this newfound knowledge.

      Actually, not to split hairs or anything, but if you're having that much of a problem, you list the choices and go back to your buddy (or call him on your cell phone) and ask him which one he wants. Remember, the scenario you provided is your friend running an errand for me. The problem with using scenarios like this is that you can craft anything you want to make your point.

      Let's deal with real, hard facts here. The first time my wife sat down in front of a computer running Linux, she looked at all the foreign icons on her panel and correctly chose the web browser. Then she opened up a text editor to copy some stuff out of the browser into it. Then she saved it. Then she opened up her (mine, actually) home directory and started browsing the file system looking for it. She never once asked me "What is the d: drive?" because it never materialized to perplex her. Then she opened a mail client and realized she was logged into my account. Then she logged off and tried her old Windows username and password. Then she asked me why she couldn't login? I watched her this whole time because I was curious how she would react to it. She's a smart girl, but she's pretty sucky when it comes to computers. I was impressed, to tell you the truth. Linux isn't *that* hard to deal with.

      The thinking goes, in Windows, you learn about directory structures, a few commands to navigate around, a few basic apps for looking at files, opening programs, etc...at some point you hit a critical mass of knowledge where you just innately know how to move around and navigate new programs.

      This is a known problem and has been addressed by the major desktops. KDE has had a standard interface for years, and GNOME is finally tightening up on it as well. It is a problem that has mostly gone away. I suggest you take your Knoppix CD out to your dumbest friend's house with a windows box, pop it in, and watch him. See how he deals with it.

      How many linux users, even experts, can install an app they've never seen before (only know the basics of what it's for) in linux and start using it productively inside a few minutes without ever cracking any documentation?

      The answer is "all", because one of the main problems of free software is the lack of good documentation. So, since there isn't a manual to crack open, it is a requirement to be able to figure out how to use the software productively quickly without cracking open the non-existant manual. :)

      Ok, then, think about a piano. Anyone, even a child, can figure out the piano if given a chance to hit a couple of keys. That's Windows. They hand you the keys and you hit a couple and soon you're banging out simple tunes.

      Hmm, try again. Windows is a trumpet, with three valves that don't make any sense and a stupid slide. You have to either discover or have someone tell you to blow higher and tighten your embrosure just to get out of one stupid octave. Linux is the piano. :) Everything is exposed, you can look inside it and puzzle out how it works, and you can sit and use it productively within minutes of bootup. Personally, I prefer guitar.

      .there are a LOT of places where linux is worse than Wi

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by psicard · · Score: 1

      You are right but for one thing. Linux was never made to compete with windows end users. For some reason a lot of computer users are not satisfied with Windows and are looking for a alternative thus going to Linux/Mac and for some reason believe that Linux is a big marketing company.{/clue its not} When someone like IBM, Novel comes out with a "Desktop Linux" then I think you can make the point better.

      --
      what?
    8. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      The installing Linux issue is relevant, more so than installing Windows precisely because most Windows users have had their OS pre-installed by their PC manufacturer. How many people in comparison have Linux pre-installed on their PC?

      And how are these users going to switch to Linux? By installing it themselves. (Sure, some people will be able to call upon a Linux old-hand to help them out, but not everyone will be so fortunate.) The Linux installation needs to be easier, or at least more user-friendly, to cater for these people.

      Also, you're overlooking the fact that OEMs aren't about to give customers what they don't want. And 99.9 percent of their customers want Windows, so OEMs ship their PCs with Windows. When people start asking for Linux by name within an order of magnitude of how often they ask for Windows, then manufacturers will start offering Linux as a standard offering. Until then, pre-installed Linux systems will be limited to niche PCs (eg, servers) and smaller vendors.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I think one major problem Linux faces is that Joe Average can't comprehend the speed that Linux has been changing with.

      And that's another important point why some people (like myself) don't use Linux. I run a business. I don't play games. My computers are 100% vital to me being able to eat. A new kernel is released every other day it seems, and for a while, Red Hat was doing a new distro every 6 months. 6 months?!?! Are you out of your fucking mind? My computers need to run for *years* without "upgrades". The rapid changes are a huge turnoff to me in my business. I want nothing more than NOT to change stuff with my computers. They work, they make me money. Period. I've got auto update running on all of them, so if there's a patch, they get patched, and otherwise, I don't worry about it. I'll look at Linux at some point when it's mature and NOT changing every other day. Right now, it's just too flaky to be used in my business.

    10. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by bangular · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is, many OEM's _can't_ sell Linux preinstalled on desktops without the strong hand of MS slamming down upon them. It's all or nothing. You either sell all Window's PC's or you're paying retail for for each copy. No OEM discount. and if you have a contract, we will sue you for breech of contract.

      Not saying there's a huge demand, but if they offered it, people would buy it. Espically if it were the same PC but minus the cost of windows and office bundles they many times include. This would be very significant because for cheap PC's (some as low as a couple hundred bucks), shaving the price off of software could lower the price of a 300 dollar PC by as much as 50 dollars. So for many, the option of a PC that's around 20 percent less in price but is the same hardware, it would be a no brainer. Espically if OEM's started to give Linux a little nudge and put those PC's on the forefront.

      These are all dreams though because OEM's have signed long term contracts with MS and when it's re-negotation time, it's either you run an all MS shop or you pay retail.

    11. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by pben · · Score: 2, Insightful


      RPM's are shitty and are the cause of more problems than they are worth. RPM's should have been done away with long ago. I remember as a noob, same problems. Could never install RPM's because of dependencys. I think distro's should adopt a portage style package system. Compiling from source takes longer, but it takes care of idiotic linking issues that RPM's create.


      Oh yea, waiting 12 hours for KDE should really make a great impression on that new user! Ok if you install bins of KDE your Joe Average finds out about blender, gimp, or whatever, it will only take twenty or thirty minutes to compile!

      Portage and Gentoo should be kept far away from most users. If there ever was one group that should not use Portage it is new users. If the Debian team would spilt off the x86 platform from the reset so that they could keep the stable releases coming out every six months or so it would be ideal. That is the idea behind Fedora but when I tried it I found missing dependencies. Maybe the knock on rpm hell is based on that, maybe they can get their act together with core 2.

      Debian unstable is a pain to install but it is the most current and complete bin based distro. If you find a something missing or broked and file a bug report it is fixed within days. They are great. If they were not always waiting to fix up bugs in the lesser used platforms and was eaiser to install.

    12. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by ectospasm · · Score: 1

      My computers need to run for *years* without "upgrades". The rapid changes are a huge turnoff to me in my business.

      No one is forcing you to upgrade. With Microsoft, you can run for a few years, and then you must upgrade. With Linux (or any other free OS), you never have to upgrade if you so desire. The freedom is that the choice is entirely yours. With Microsoft, you unfortunately do not have that luxury.

      --


      We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of the dreams.
    13. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by bangular · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You missed the point. Binary packages as a base install are fine, but NOT for upgrading software from 3rd parties. If you installed your kde from the CD then it's fine as a binary, but when you grab an rpm from freshmeat that was compilied against gcc 2.95 and you are running 3.4, there are going to be problems. Problems that do not occour when compiling from source. RPM's have not standard on naming packages either. Sometimes the same package is split up into 5 parts. How are you supposed to resolve dependencies then? With almost every binary package system, the second you install software not supplied by the vendor or from source, you are almost guaranteed to break dependencies. The gnu build system does not suffer from this. I think portage is an acceptable wrapper for it.

    14. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      How exactly do I *have* to upgrade my MS boxes? First off, formal support for W2K is going to last for at least another 3-4 years. Formal support for XP is going to last much longer. Red Hat support of it's small business products is already dead.

      Secondly, the informal support of MS products will last a very, very long time due to the numbers of users out there using it. I don't know how I'd find support for a Linux distro that was even 2 years old.

      If anything, it's Linux that forces me to upgrade, not Windows.

    15. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is "making it" important anyway? It's useable on the desktop for geeks already. Most average people have a hard enough time using Windows, an OS designed from the outset to be used by non-technical people.

      The only way Linux will ever see Windows-like success is if it becomes just like Windows. Why on earth should we want that?

      If distributors like Lindows want to take it upon themselves to dumb shit down for the average user, then fine. Not our problem. But if Windows users want to use Linux at home (at work it's the admins responsibility), then they have to do the leg work.

      People are lazy. I used to configure things on Windows to be more efficent (or just look neat) at work and people would ask how I did it. I'd tell them and point them to the relevant resources. Five minutes later they'd be back. "That's complicated/It didn't work...could you show me how to do it?" This translates to "do it for me." Fair enough the first time but it gets old when you're doing it for the twentieth goddamn time.

      Fuck 'em. I'm not carrying clueless chumps that have no interest in helping themselves.

    16. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by pben · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that you missed my point! Waiting twenty minues for gimp or blender to install is that last thing that Joe Average want to do.

      Yes too many disros are bad but that is a call to improve the disto. If you are pulling random rpms off freshmeat you are asking for trouble. The distro should have the tools to install a tested version and all that it needs. Apt-get is probably the bet one out there, mainly because a lot of people work very hard to make it happen. That is the kind of effort that is going to be need to get linux onto the desktop.

      Make it easy for the user to get what he wants and he isn't going to downlaod random rpms off freshmeat. Then it will work correctly. Asking Joe Average to compile it from the source and waiting for minutes for it to install is the wrong way to go!

      No short cuts I am afraid, just a lot of work that just isn't being done by the current distros.

    17. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by peterpi · · Score: 1

      Great Article :)

    18. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1
    19. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lovaly analogy. You feel experimental so you put 7-8 red savinas in dinner :) (they're like bell pepper, just smaller right?)

    20. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your description of your business computers sounds like a custom fit for Debian 'stable' - unchanging for years, only backported security updates that can be auto-scripted to run every night.

      For anyone still wondering why "Debian (stable) is SOOOO STALE!! Why don't they upgrade it as frequently as the other distros!", this guy's situation is why. You want a distro like RH or Mandrake, use Debian testing. You want a solidly unchanging platform for business use, use Debian stable.

    21. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by El+Volio · · Score: 1
      [Users] feel that the product should be well-designed enough that most of what they want to accomplish should be apparent without having to read any doc.

      You're right. But the problem here is the applications, and I daresay I've run into as many obtuse Windows apps as I have Linux applications. But my wife, perhaps the least technical person I've ever met in my life, was able to use Mozilla and Evolution in seconds to browse the web and email her family in another country with very little instruction. She opens OpenOffice files I send her and prints them with no difficulty. All without reading a single bit of documentation.

      And yes, I can install software without any difficulty, assuming it's well-put-together as most of it is. OK, I cheat - I use yum under Fedora. But Windows can't do that. But you point out that users want to be able to sit down and do the equivalent of bang out "Mary Had a Little Lamb" without being told to RTFM. Again, all I can say is that there are plenty of users who are able to do that. Windows is not the most intuitive interface in the world, and neither is GNOME. But both can get the job done, and it's a fallacy to say that it's impossible for the average user to achieve some level of immediate productivity in a Free software environment.

      --

      "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

    22. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by gidds · · Score: 1
      Good points, but a few responses:

      The first time my wife sat down in front of a computer running Linux...

      ...she was using one that had already been installed and set up with the sort of software she might use, with the right network and ISP settings, &c. (And I'm sure it didn't hurt having a comforting presence beside her, too.)

      A new user, confronted with installing a distro, choosing suitable software from the tons available, installing it, and setting it up, might find things a little different.

      My own experience with free software culture shows that people want to help and are willing to help. I sat on an irc channel...

      Again, you're using knowledge that the uninitiated simply don't have. I've never used IRC, and I'm far from new to all this. How do you know where to look for help? How do you find all these helpful people?

      There's not a single place where Windows is superior to Linux.

      There is at least one: M$ Office. I hate to say it, coz I know that other office packages have done a huge amount of work and are better in some ways, but I know many people who need to be able to read and write Office files, without worrying that obscure bits of formatting will be lost or that they won't be able to send files back. Rightly or wrongly, this is the main show-stopper, without which they simply won't consider anything else. If/when Linux is seen to provide a seamless, transparent, drop-in replacement for Office, it stands to gain a lot more users.

      (Disclaimer: I'm not a Linux user myself. Mac OS X for me; an example of a real standard and consistent interface.)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    23. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...she was using one that had already been installed and set up with the sort of software she might use, with the right network and ISP settings, &c. (And I'm sure it didn't hurt having a comforting presence beside her, too.)

      Actually, while you're right that I had already installed it, it was RedHat 7.2, and it was easier to install than windows 2000. Windows 2000, as you might recall, has a stupid text-driven installer that you use for partitioning and crap and then it does work for awhile, then reboots and runs you through a stupid wizard, then works for awhile, reboots again, and I don't remember what it does after that. In any case, RedHat 7.2 installed on my system out of the box with everything working (except sound, a problem which doesn't exist anymore for me and current distributions) and using default options. She could've installed it, I'm certain, but she never has. As far as ISP settings, we're behind a NAT router on a cable connection, so it only needed to work with DHCP and the network card, a strength of Linux. I didn't discuss the installation because when I started in with RedHat 7.2, I quickly learned that installation wasn't an issue anymore.

      She also finds my presence intimidating when she's using a computer 'cause I always bitch "Why are you doing it the hard way?" "Shut up, Dave". :)

      Again, you're using knowledge that the uninitiated simply don't have. I've never used IRC, and I'm far from new to all this. How do you know where to look for help? How do you find all these helpful people?

      Instructions clearly posted on the GnuCash site led me to their IRC channel. The "uninitiated" have no problems surfing the web, as previously established. They only have to read the directions posted there to find help. I hadn't used IRC since the internet was telnet-driven, so while I did have the advantage of already knowing what IRC was, I don't think it served me in this case because finding it through the UI was completely different than I'm used to.

      There is at least one: M$ Office. I hate to say it, coz I know that other office packages have done a huge amount of work and are better in some ways, but I know many people who need to be able to read and write Office files, without worrying that obscure bits of formatting will be lost or that they won't be able to send files back. Rightly or wrongly, this is the main show-stopper, without which they simply won't consider anything else. If/when Linux is seen to provide a seamless, transparent, drop-in replacement for Office, it stands to gain a lot more users.

      That's just people being extremely picky. Before Microsoft had their monopoly, an Office suite wouldn't have been the deal-breaker like it is now. Personally, I find that KSpread and family are just as good, if not better, than MS Office. They just don't read MS Office files. I find that OpenOffice.org is an excellent office suite, but unreliable. It doesn't run well at all on my laptop, so it's a pain in the ass, but KOffice runs great. It really pisses me off that people focus on one thing, file formats, and refuse to go any further until that one thing is perfect to their satisfaction.

      Oh well. I suppose the serfs of our feudalistic ancestry didn't mind being beat up by the nobility as long as they had shelter.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    24. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by gidds · · Score: 1
      and it was easier to install than windows 2000

      Not if Windows 2000 is already installed. The sort of people I'm talking about have never installed an OS themselves, and would need overwhelming reasons to do so. (In fact, the two I most have in mind are still running Windows 98, coz that's what came with the machines.)

      Instructions clearly posted on the GnuCash site led me to their IRC channel.

      Fair enough; that's a clear direction. But if it means finding, installing, and setting up a new app (even if they know what IRC is), then many new users won't bother.

      Take the case of Mac OS X. In most cases, installing a new app looks like this:

      • Download archive or disk image
      • Open it to reveal app
      • Drag app into /Applications, or to anywhere on HD
      That's all there is to it! Four mouse clicks, and a few seconds. A few cases involve running an installer app, but that's just as easy. Compare those to the Unix app I installed recently, which involved battling through umpteen levels of fink dependencies, configurations, &c. Took several hours to download and compile, and this was just a simple app without a GUI! (I'm sure that they're not all like that. But why aren't they all as simple as the Mac OS X case?)

      Before Microsoft had their monopoly, an Office suite wouldn't have been the deal-breaker like it is now.

      Oh, quite. I'm not saying any of this is right or good, just that it's the way things are, and it's something the whole Linux environment will have to address if it wants to attract these sorts of users.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    25. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Not if Windows 2000 is already installed.

      There's a certain critical mass we have to achieve before we can reasonably expect a lot of OEMs to install Linux for us. Your point is valid, but it's not something we can address until we have some large percentage of the users that are willing to install their own OSs.

      Fair enough; that's a clear direction. But if it means finding, installing, and setting up a new app (even if they know what IRC is), then many new users won't bother.

      Um, my mandrake system installed 3 IRC clients. :) I can bitch about it installing 3 for awhile, but point is I didn't have to install anything.

      Take the case of Mac OS X. In most cases, installing a new app looks like this:

      Mandrake Linux:

      1. K Menu (or the stupid paw) -> Configuration -> Mandrake Control Center
      2. Software Management
      3. Install Software
      4. Now you can text-search for software or you can browse the list of packages, click a box to install it. Dependency checking is taken care of for you and has few problems, if any, these days
      5. Click "Install Now"
      6. Done!

      There are a few complications, such as how to deal with rpms downloaded off the web, but the fact is that there are mandrake-supplied rpms for most free software I've found. I don't think an average user will have problems with Mandrake, seriously.

      Oh, quite. I'm not saying any of this is right or good, just that it's the way things are, and it's something the whole Linux environment will have to address if it wants to attract these sorts of users.

      I disagree to an extent. The main problem is that I don't think we'll ever be able to drop-in replace MS Office if file formats are the deal-breaker. Instead, we need to create apps and games that only run on Linux to attract people to it. Sorta like a game as addicting as Tetris, but sorry, doesn't run on Windows. Stick it on Knoppix, though, and pass it around. Something that can't be provided by Windows that regular users (not the IT-crazed phreaks) will really really want, even decide they need.

      Oh well. We do have to deal with the problem somehow, but perhaps by brute-forcing our way we're going the wrong way. Rearrange the problem and re-solve it and see what you come up with. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    26. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by severoon · · Score: 1

      The problem with using scenarios like this is that you can craft anything you want to make your point.

      The problem? That's precisely the point of using scenarios like this. I, the author, can craft anything I want to make a point. You, the reader, however, are (or should be) restrained to the rules I set up in the world of analogy. Allow me to present the definition of the word: Similarity in some respects between things that are otherwise dissimilar. See, I know that linux and peppers are dissimilar in many ways. However, pointing out those dissimilarities as you have done does nothing to (1) contradict my point or (2) advance the discussion.

      I gave you the scenario. You were supposed to impute from that scenario that the "really good" produce mart is like linux. The normal grocery store, with only one representative pepper from each main category existing on the continuum from fruitiness to hotness, is like Windows. Enough choice for most purposes, not much confusion. The point is, with more choice comes responsibility...the one providing the choices has to do something to make this vast array of possibilities navigable. Indeed, the wonderful produce mart my analogy is based upon actually exists in my neighborhood, and they have a little description of each pepper and appropriate uses hanging underneath each pepper bin.

      I'm not trying to start a flame war here, so let me explain why I'm taking great pains to reply to this part of your post. This example I'm pointing out, like much of the rest of your post, is not arguing the issue but rather arguing the semantics I chose to employ in my post. This is a common derailment tactic, which I really only find acceptable if it's done to howlingly funny ends.

      If you want to deal with real, hard facts, then let's not go off an a tangent. In your example with your wife, for instance, you've again shown that you missed my point. Give your wife two computers with freshly formatted hard drives, a linux CD and a Windows CD, and see how many questions she has to ask and how much doc she has to read before she gets each one running with comparable functionality. My projection: she will indeed have a half dozen or so questions with Windows before it goes on. Linux, on the other hand, will remain in CD form if you don't coach her with questions she ought to be asking. I've not heard of Knoppix, but maybe that one is particularly easy to install. Give her any one of the "main" distros though: mandrake, debian, RedHat, or SuSe (I left one or two out probably, but you get the point).

      So, since there isn't a manual to crack open, it is a requirement to be able to figure out how to use the software productively quickly without cracking open the non-existant manual. :)

      You're being cute here, but this requirement of which you speak is precisely one of the reasons that many people abandon linux early on. They do not possess this ethereal quality of being able to puzzle out this sort of thing given no crossover knowledge from other, more well-documented applications they've installed in the past.

      Your experience with the gentleman in the GNUcash chat room is far from the norm. (We've gone from discussing semantics to employing one-off anecdotes...is this a step forward?) I think you'll find that lack of documentation and navigation of the vast choices are indeed pretty common user complaints and that the linux community willing to provide help is overloaded for the most part. I think that you'll find your isolated experience of one person helping you for hours on end a pretty rare occurrence for most.

      All of the friends I spoke with on this matter have tried and abandoned linux within the last year, most of them within the last six months even. So these problems do indeed still exist. And keep in mind when I say linux, I'm not just talking about the OS kernel and shell, I mean the whole kit'n'kaboodle that normall

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    27. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by severoon · · Score: 1

      Why is "making it" important anyway? It's useable on the desktop for geeks already.

      I suspect that not everyone will yield to the idea of a more usable linux. And I sympathize. The careful concentration of effort to the right details, the delicate crafting of one's history with this OS, the unhurried placement of script after script, cronjob after cronjob to make one's own linux box a stable, self-sustaining environment--these elaborate attentions elevate computer usage to a kind of ceremony, a tribute to order and distinction. You can claim a rarefied expertise and it's not easy to see all that hard work go on the dust heap. And a certain satisfaction is lost when a ritual is replaced with indiscriminate button-clicking, when a perilous enterprise gives way to a sure thing. Still, even amongst geeks, how often do we find ourselves with the leisure to savor the ceremonious or disaster narrowly averted?

      Beyond convenience, though, there's a deeper appeal to the simpler methods. The complications of traditional linux often have to do with establishing our mastery over the details. The simpler vision I have for the future of linux still aims to please the geeks, but it's more attentive to the inherent strengths of the operating system. Give it a little push in the right direction and linux would assemble itself into a self-sustaining, self-maintaining environment. To me, this is more remarkable than the fact that a hacker can make it work with much labor. Neither the geeks nor the average users are deprived when we work with the platform as much as we do on it. Our potential to labor is still there, but on new, creative work building an architecture over this accessible power. This is similar to the early Java vs. C++ debates. Yes, I can build an enterprise-wide, distributed application in C++. And I can also do it in assembly, typing only with pencils taped to my elbows. It's far more interesting, though, to create the functional pieces quickly and work on solutions that make the software more effective.

      I think it's important for linux to "make it" to the average desktop because until it does, the real dollars and development effort will not go into it to see it reach its full potential. If you think linux has already reached its full potential, you are sadly (and grossly) underestimating this OS.

      You ask why we should want to make linux like Windows? Well, we shouldn't, not completely anyway. But what's wrong with picking out the few aspects of Windows that people (even geeks) like about Windows and building those in, like usability? I'm always hearing from people like you about how great, how flexible, how powerful linux is. Well, if it's so flexible, so powerful, why can it not seem to accomodate the average user? Is this such a dramatic requirement that even the great linux is not up to the task? What is it about Joe Average's demands that Windows has little trouble trouncing linux, a far superior bit of software in most other respects?

      I can hear you saying it now: but Windows doesn't accomodate those users either! Yea, and so what? According to you, linux provides a better, more flexible foundation as an operating system in every respect than Windows, right? So, how come it's falling flat on its face compared to Windows when it's already more-than-evenly-matched against its competitor? (And don't say, it IS more usable in this way and that, blah blah blah. Usability is measured in hard numbers by how many home users are actually running it as far as I'm concerned.) One thing I find with Windows is that operating system clumsiness often requires that applications be confusing or simply cause them to fail in significant ways. I agree that linux is indeed more elegant in this respect, and it does indeed provide a better platform for usability and extension. However, this platform has been nowhere near exploited. I'm simply calling for this aspect of linux's potential to be realized alongside th

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    28. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I don't completely disagree with you.

      Instead, why don't we do this:

      You go to my website and send me an email on that form. That way we don't have to post our email addresses here on slashdot where everybody and their dog-troll can spam us.

      First you have to stipulate that my wife is an "average" user. She is, but you don't actually know her.

      I will provide her with a computer and a copy of Windows 2000 (It's the only windows OS I have that will install from a single CD. If she did win98, she'd have to deal with installing win95 first and then running the upgrade. I don't have XP or NT at all. I *do* have Me, if you'd prefer to use that for the comparison). I'll also provide her with a copy of Mandrake Linux 9.2 (the most recent). It's not exactly 'fair' because it's the latest and greatest Mandrake against an older Windows. If you have a copy of XP you'd like to send, we can do that. We don't have to activate it, just get past the initial installation.

      I won't help her at all. Her only source of information (besides the phone) is going to be another computer internet-connected. She'll write down every problem she encounters and take notes about how she solved the problem, assuming that she encounters any problems with either of them.

      The computer I have for her to do this is fairly old. It's a K6-2, 450mhz, with a Sissy motherboard. The Sissy has onboard sound and video, and is already known to work with Mandrake Linux and Windows 2000. I'll make sure there's a network card in there that win2k has a driver for, and we'll set some requirements.

      Are you interested in this? When we're done, I'll publish an article on my website about it and get my website slashdotted (if you can mirror it for the slashdot post, I'd be much obliged).

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    29. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by severoon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an interesting experiment. If I'd known you were actually going to take me up on this, I'd have put a little more thought into making a really fair comparison. In any case, not to drag things out, Win 2k and mandrake seem close enough.

      Who is your wife, anyway? My gf would never go through this. :-)

      sev

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    30. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Dude, don't forget to email me from my website before this discussion gets archived. Otherwise, I won't know how else to get in touch with you.

      Who is your wife, anyway? My gf would never go through this. :-)

      You should ask your girlfriend sometime what "Unconditional Love" means. :) My wife and I have been through quite a bit together. See, I have a distinctly geek background, but when I finished High School I went off determined to live not like a geek at all. So I didn't go to college, and all kinds of crap. Had a lot of fun, actually. My wife has no geek in her (except periodically when I screw her brains out). :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    31. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      So you never, ever, ever run Windows Update, right? Because that would be "changing the OS"

      Oh wait... says right there you do, so you're already contradicting yourself.

      Just because Linux actually changes does NOT mean you have to. Just like a lot of people run Win98 still. Just like some people have a version of linux that's a few years old. It does what they need.

      You mistake "rapid change" for flakyness, which is simply wrong.

      Every year, Ford releases new models... does that mean your 2000 model is "flaky"? No. It still works, but, OH MY.. EVERY TWELVE MONTHS!!!!!!! Can you believe that?

      So if you're waiting for Linux to slow down, or stop being creative and not update every DAY, you'll never get there.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
  34. Re: Small Alternative Local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a similar experience moving to portland from sacramento, but i used to work for the sacramento indy, so i know it's not so much a giant media conspiricy as it is a case of "oh, i like that layout, let's steal it for our paper"

  35. Re:I would. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything

    Oh come on you guys, I'm sure Portland must be ground zero for more than a few nuclear missiles in the USS... er, nevermind that either...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  36. you have a space before the .jpg you dumbfuck, FIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  37. just accept & love Linux for what it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Syllable operating system (forked from the dead AtheOS project) seeks to create a free-software OS without all of these problems Linux faces on the desktop. Boots up fast, isn't bloated, easy to program for, no mishmash of dependencies, etc. It's coming along pretty nicely (the kernel is [quote] "99% complete"), and when the GUI frontend and other parhelia are done, it should become the first GPL operating system normal people can use.

    Linux is great for what it does. It's a switz-army knife of an operating system for all sorts of esoteric professional and geek uses. But end-users don't want this, and forging Linux into something it is not is ultimately self-defeating. So be happy with what Linux is and accept for as such, and do not be upset when people say it is not good for grandma. Projects like Syllable are where the future of the free-software desktop lays.

    Let Linux do what it is good for, and let the other 99% of the population who isn't technical find their GPl`ed goodness elsewhere.

    1. Re:just accept & love Linux for what it is by Rysc · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, or at least I see a good point in what you're saying, or what I think you're saying.

      I don't view Linux as the ultimate OS, although I sort've hope it could be. What I view as the job of Linux is to break Microsoft. Linux is not the best possible desktop, not the best possible server, and not the best possible Unix. It's just got enough of each of those elements that it can clobber Windows to death and really open up the market.

      Once the monopoly is gone and the environment is more open, a really good OS that's really good at being a desktop can come along and supplant the Linux desktop. A really good Unix (maybe one of the BSDs, or the HURD, or something new) can come along and be the new best Unix.

      Linux is not the end, it is jut the beginning. Without Linux chances are MS will never be defeated and none of these other OSs will be able to be created, much less become popular. Linux is "good enough" to take on MS in all areas at once. A better OS can topple Linux easily and quickly, once Linux is the dominant.

      Remember, there is no chance of a Linux monopoly. Linux demands open standards. Look at Syllable... how many GPL Linux apps have been ported already? How many would be trivial? If Linux crushes all competition, and then we decide something else is better, all essential functionality can be ported to any new OS in a year or two. There is no lock in! It just wont happen.

      I hail Linux and its coming dominance. I will be even more delighted when Linux fades away into history... a valiant, indispensible fighter, eventually no longer needed.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    2. Re:just accept & love Linux for what it is by severoon · · Score: 1

      I'm having a bit of a tough time with whatever it is you mean by "forging it into something it is not is ultimately self-defeating". I'm not talking about making it into something it's not. I'm talking about letting people take advantage of what it already is.

      I'm of the opinion that a good product, no matter what it is, suggests its own proper use. This doesn't mean that things can't occasionally be good multitaskers with a bit of creative thinking and application, but it does mean the following: all products are designed to serve some purpose. If that is truly so, and the design of such a thing revolved around facilitating some end, then inherent in the design should be accessibility towards that end. It's like the titanium can opener, it opens cans and it's indestructible. It's a can opener welded into a titanium case. The case guarantees its indestructibility, but it also makes it impossible to open cans with it. It's poor accessibility to the main feature. This is linux, as opposed to Windows' tin foil can opener that can only open cans when reinforced and used delicately. If the linux can opener was made out of titanium directly, it would reach its full potential of being indestructible and still be able to open cans.

      sev

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  38. sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about poor old avarage Jill?

    1. Re:sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jill's a fucking whore. Nobody cares about her opion on Linux because she's too busy sucking cock to RTFM.

    2. Re:sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure many of those who frequent slashdot keep here busy...

  39. funny :P by compubomb · · Score: 0

    heheh http://www.willametteweek.com/admin https://198.107.45.80:19638/webhost/services/virtu alhosting/siteadmin?ocw_login_domain=wweek.com heh.. it's an ensim server :P rofl

  40. Re:you have a space before the .jpg you dumbfuck, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No, YOU have a space before the JPEG, you asswipe.

    I cut n pasted the URL, so if there's a space, it's a Slashdot bug.

  41. Arctic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The article starts off Linux creator Linus Torvalds chose a penguin as Linux's logo after an arctic bird nipped him at a zoo (left column). Well, it wasn't a penguin then - they are from the Antarctic.

    The whole thing is a throwback to the days before companies like IBM started coming onboard and Linux became mainstream. I had not realised just how far things have changed until reading that stuff about long-haired hippie programmers (paraphrased). Linus looks pretty presentable (he always did) and photos nowadays are usually of him rather than Alan Cox or RMS.

    Around here, Linux is seen as a professional OS and one for professionals. Perceptions . . .

  42. trash talk by niko9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything,

    A bit OT, and have some karma to burn, but where exactly do you live that's so important that Portland can't be the epicenter for anything? And what does that comment have anything to do with a tech story? If your "not sure" then don't type it.

    Some people forget that even Torvalds came from the igloo cubicles of an obscure University.

    [end rant]

    Disclaimer: I don't live in Portland.

  43. Those germans by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    have contributed a lot to *nix... but my favorite is Knoppix

    I keep burned CDs of knoppix with me, so when I start talking to one of my coworkers about linux (I work in a hospital... I'm about the only geek here), I hand them a CD and tell them to give it a whirl, pretty much risk-free to their PC.

    I've found that to be one of the best little CDs I have ever encountered... and I looked high and low for a paypal link so I could throw Klaus Knopper a few bones...

    Anybody know of one? I, for one, believe in paying for useful stuff.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Those germans by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      I think Klaus Knoppers is not opposed to Money.

    2. Re:Those germans by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      Germany: Highest amount of Linux users per capita.

      I personally expect Germany to be the first 'first world' country in which Linux reaches serious critcal mass.

      In fact, that's what I build my business on. :-)
      ( www.richdale.de )

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  44. Uh... hello? OSDL? by BiOFH · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything...

    Why not? The Open Source Development Lab (OSDL) is in Portland. I'd think that counts for _something_. Then there's Intel's first real [huge] Linux farm which was instrumental in designing and modelling the Pentium 4 (howdy DPG). Not to mention several Linux developers, coders and doc maintainers and that Randal guy (hey, Randal).

    Sign me,
    A BiOFH who will always call PDX home

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  45. how long will it take SCO... by cenonce · · Score: 1

    to send the school a licensing agreement now that they've been on /.?

    -A

    1. Re:how long will it take SCO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      about 15 seconds.
      time enough for the laser printer to warm up...

  46. Re:Screw Joe Average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait huh?
    This post makes perfice sence. natural selection at its bets.
    Think of it like the Darwin awards for computer users.

  47. Now... by SkArcher · · Score: 1

    What might get more people to at least try GNU/Linux is putting either Live CD distros or full distro installer packs in shops, a la AOL CDs.

    Sure, it will require a lot of CDs, but it is in a good cause.

    I think AOL gives away about 1000 CDs for every new user (and less than that once you take into account people who just use AOL for the free time and then chuck it away) - does anyone know a CD manufacturer who can do us a good deal on a LOT of CDs?

    --

    An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    1. Re:Now... by anonicon · · Score: 1

      There's another way to skin this cat, which is to take a page from P2P and distribute the costs out to the area that's AOLing Linux discs in their area. That way, there's no need for a central distributor to pick up the tab - the cost is distributed out to each area according to its own need.

      For example, if you've got some of us in Cincinnati, we take care of replicating the discs off our own PCs and getting them into local AOLish freebie channels. Where help can come down from on-high is for each LUG area to share best-of advice, experiences and troubleshooting tips.

      One other sidenote, for which I'll be glad to be wrong. Outside of IBM's push for Linux, the Linux community is a lot like the Indie music community in that it's generally competing with more-widely financed, promoted and reviewed products. Perhaps there are a lot of guerilla or shoe-string promo techniques we could take from the Indie music scene and apply towards growing our base?

      Peace,
      Chuck

  48. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderation: 100% troll, but quite funny.

  49. The Art of War by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1



    You sez:

    " ... sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy"

    True.

    But for those who have tore thru "The Art of War" knows that many times the best way to fight a war is to let your opponents fighting amongst themselves - which btw MicroSoft is doing, with SCO against the Unices world thingy - and if M$ can do to us, so can we.

    M$ has a lot of vulnerabilities, it's practically a leaking dreadnaught. To keep M$ busy, point out to the investors (aka WallStreet) those leaks, one by one (or a dozen at a time, if you choose) and when you watch those WallStreet rats jump ship by the drove, you will see the M$ dreadnaugh starts sinking, and sinks fast.

    Just a thought. Not a threat. Never a promise.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  50. about this "portland" you speak of by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    i'm three semesters away from my term of service and looking to get the hell out of here. i was originally thinking portland, although that plan was pretty much put on back burner on anecdotal accounts of there being shite for jobs there, more so than anywhere else. property values looked a lot more reasonable than wash dc where i am now, which was great, but that does no good when you cant get a job. i'm hoping someone can discuss this point to give me a better idea. i'm technical, but the my friends who want to move with me are mostly non-technical types.

    i knew there was a growing tech culture in portland, but in some ways i'm a bit suprised there's a linux/portland article like this. its kind of reminded me about that blip on the radar, and gives it some good light. i still cant tell whether it was just a regional article not unlike many you'd find in many regional papaers, or whether there's some mertis to portland's "linux army" claims. is portland really a rapidly-warming (hot) bed?

    i've been wanting to ask this for a while, but didnt know where to ask. even if you just wanna suggest better places for this discussion, i'd be honored by your replies.

    1. Re:about this "portland" you speak of by modnoah · · Score: 1

      The PDX job market is really tough. Which is a shame, because Portland is a really amazing city to live in.

      Prior to the "national nosedive" of the tech economy, Portland was bustling with activity... especially on the hardware/tech/manufacturing side of things. After the "national nosedive" a huge segment of the workforce lost their jobs, just like everywhere else in the country.

      To give you an idea of the job market here... Here are some anecdotes detailing the job searchs of a few real people I know personally, who recently moved to Portland.

      To give you hope: I spent a full year looking, and eventually found an amazing job at a nonprofit music recording studio . Results are not typical, YMMV.

      My friends moved here last June and both found jobs at Powell's City of Books, and then another, better job, at a local university.

      Many people who were in the tech industry have switched fields. I was looking for programming jobs, and at some point I became so desparate for interviews I tried to work as a car salesman.

      The "Hotbed" that the article discusses, is mostly not really about tech employment it's about wonderful portland nonprofits !

      Such as FreeGeek which teaches people to build computers, then gives them the linux machine they build.

    2. Re:about this "portland" you speak of by amountlad · · Score: 1

      My experience tells me that Portland is indeed a rapidly-warming hot bed for open source. You can't swing a mouse without hitting an O'Reilly author in this town.

      There's Free Geek, 3 separate LUG's, the Open Source Convention in the Summer, two Open Source Bill's that failed the legislature this past session, the Linux Fund, the OSDL and more.

      On the other hand, that doesn't necesarilly translate to jobs. This seems to be picking up slowly, so it's worth monitoring the situation, but make no mistake jobs are tough to find right now.

      Nevertheless, exciting things are brewing even among the unemployed and eventually that's going to spark some great things.

    3. Re:about this "portland" you speak of by Tolovana · · Score: 1

      Randal Schwartz had this to say, many many rains ago: Try Seattle Carol

  51. frenetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, frenetic, that's a good word to describe slashdot:

    cout@freakshow:~$ nc dict.org 2628
    220 pan.alephnull.com dictd 1.8.0/rf on Linux 2.4.18-14
    d frenetic
    150 1 definitions retrieved
    151 "frenetic" wn "WordNet (r) 2.0"
    frenetic
    adj : excessively agitated; transported with rage or other violent
    emotion; "frantic with anger and frustration";
    "frenetic screams followed the accident"; "a frenzied
    look in his eye" [syn: {frantic}, {phrenetic}, {frenzied}]
    .
    250 ok [d/m/c = 1/0/104; 0.000r 0.000u 0.000s]

  52. Re:woo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last Post! enlightment Google

  53. World class in: Bookstores, Art dealers, Parks... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative


    Linus Torvalds can go anywhere. It's probably no accident that he and the The Open Source Development Lab are in Portland. (Beaverton is one of the towns that are part of the metropolitan area of 1.4 million people called Portland.)

    Portland has the largest bookstore in the world.

    Portland has one of the largest and most successful dealers in contemporary art in the world. The gallery has a funny name, but shows the work of over 1,100 artists.

    Portland has the largest park inside a city in the world. The park has over 74 miles of wilderness hiking trails.

    Portland is the home of Pink Martini, a band that writes multi-cultural songs. One of Pink Martini's songs was once one of the most popular songs in France. You can listen to the music video.

    It's a 55 minute drive from downtown Portland to the ski areas. "World Class Skiing in Your Own Backyard."

    The K-12 Linux Project, in Portland, is one of the more successful projects for giving Linux to average users, who in this case are students.

    Portland borders on the confluence of the Willamette River and the Columbia River, one of the largest rivers in the world. The Columbia River Gorge, on the eastern edge of Portland, is a world class wind-surfing area.

    On the other hand: Q. Why do hippies come to Portland? A. Because there are no jobs.

    Many people don't like the months of rain every year. They say Portland is the perfect place for slugs and ducks. (However, the rain cleans the air.)

  54. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was posted in the disucssion of the 2.4 v 2.6 GNU/Linux kernel showdown article. It was actually modded "5, Funny", but still copped a bunch of misguided flame. Apparently the figures do come from some FUD research somewhere (see the original thread).

  55. Joe Average by NixLuver · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wonderful, amusing article

    I've been working with lots of 'Joe Average' types in the past couple of years, and there have been many abortive attempts to 'Linuxise' my offerings (to friends, family, and moonlighting clients). My wife was a ginea pig for me, switching from her blue-screen plagued windows install on a toshiba 8100 laptop to RedHat 8 + Ximian. She's never looked back. Encouraged by this success, I've brought several other family members and a couple of moonlight clients (barter system - including a veterinarian and a law firm) over to the 'free side'. Very few have experienced any real trouble.

    In short, right now, if a given person doesn't absolutely require windows-based apps (like custom applications or games, etc), Linux is ready for the desktop of Joe Average Computer User. The small business office or home user that's not a gamer can recieve significant value increase from Linux, and I have at least 22 happy customers right now.

    1. Re:Joe Average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but I'd be curious to know if all those people are up to date with all the security patches and such.

      Are they running a recent kernel, etc...

  56. More good press from the BBC. by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Everyone's favorite "alternative" news source, the BBC is also running a nice summary of the impending Linux stampeed. The rebellion is on:

    If you spend a dollar with a local company working on Linux, that dollar stays in your economy," said Simon Phipps of Sun Microsystems.

    "When you spend a dollar with a multi-national corporation as a license fee for a piece of software, that dollar leaves your country."

    "It's about keeping the money in your local economy, developing skills and developing the local economy to be strong in its own right in a global context."

    Also quoted are Bruce Perens and Eric Raymond.

    Not mentioned, however, are The Free Software Foundation or the GNU Project.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  57. a stresses windows user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. LINN-ix? by Nick_is_my_nick · · Score: 1

    ... Linux (pronounced "LINN-ix").

    Thats not how it used to sound in my computer back in the days when Linus voice sample used to come with the distros. Did 2.6 include a patch for how Linux is pronounced?

    1. Re:LINN-ix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... man I thought *I* lived in a cave.

  59. Re:I would. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
    Oh come on you guys, I'm sure Portland must be ground zero for more than a few nuclear missiles in the USS... er, nevermind that either...
    What would be worse: knowing that somewhere in Siberia a missile is pointed at your city, or learning that the Soviets didn't think your city mattered enough to waste a missile on?
    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  60. Is it just me, or has somebody else noticed ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It appears that the "author" Zach Dundas takes open source a bit too seriously. I've noticed entire paragraphs in this article that were plagarized verbatim from other sources. He obviously didn't write it on a Linux box either; his "cut & paste" works too well........

  61. How to educate Joe User? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The best way to stop these viruses is to get Joe computer user to be wary. How do you educate them? I do not know how many times I have repeated to the same folks over and over:"do not open attachments unless you know what it is", "keep your virus definitions up-to-date".

    I have not always been a geek, but even before my geek days I never caught a virus. The type of attachments and emails that these viruses come in is so blatantly obvious that any idiot can figure out which emails they should be wary of. If you do want to open up some little game that a freind sent you, at least update your definitions and scan the file first.

    Of course this is nothing in comparison to the ultimate peev which is folks giving out there passwords (or better yet, writing them down and taping it to the monitor). How damn ignorant do people have to be? Do they not realize that giving others your password completely defeats the purpose of having a password? I am not kidding when I tell you this: My girlfreind worked as an auditor at a public university. There were staff members whom had access to the database system that is used to keep track of student records including grades. They put the password for this system up on the computer and then, not only did they sit there clueless while watching student workers access this system, but this office had an open-door policy allowing any student to come in and use this computer.

    Gentlemen and ladies, this is the level of ignorance that we are dealing with.

  62. Standards by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having spent some time on an LPI course, and delving a little deeper, I found some aspects of Linux still need attention (IMHO).

    Why is it not possible to have all configuration files with the .conf added on the end. Perhaps people who still roll the software with -conf are trying to be amusing.

    Daemons are another. Why the hell call your FTP log Xtransfer.log?

    There were so many examples of this idiocy that I ended up scratching my head. For an OS built on standards, there was a remarkable lack of reasonable standards when working with the OS, to the point of it being setup in some demented legacy ideals.

    Now, I know I can go and add my own aliases, and I can amend all my log files, and break open all the configuration and fix this myself. But if you take that view, JoeNewUser is going to face this everytime you crack open a new Linux on the guy.

    In the end, JoeNewUser will have to use the command lines and configuration, where he'll come up on the non standard, sometimes illogical, system confs and logs.

    One day maybe, just maybe, Linux and its distributions will agree on its boot configuration files being in a standard place, and the same leads on for conf files.

    Now, I suppose if you use the OS every day, you work around these things. You might adapt to the non logical names, non standard conf files, and ever changing locations of files.

    Anyway, just my tuppence..

    AdmV

    --
    We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
    1. Re:Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the user shouldn't have to care about that stuff at all.

      If there was a decent GUI (like Windows or OS X) then you wouldn't care or need to know the file name.

  63. Sir, about your sig... by BOFHelsinki · · Score: 0

    I save my mod points for *BSD stories. Join me.

    Man, that's got to be the worst pick-up line ever. The ending is *way* too blunt.

  64. Ground Zero by InvaderSkooge · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, Portland is Ground Zero for a lot of rain.

    --
    Erik
    YOU ARE SAYING IMPUDENCE TO ME! THAT IS IMPUDENCE!
  65. Why do I care? by gsa700 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Way back when my brother was using windows 95 I thought it would be fun to try linux. What was cool about was that it was NOT like windows. In fact I had never seen anything so different from Windows. I bought a book with Red Hat 5.1 and it was good.

    Now I know that Linux is great for servers as I run my own site on it but even as the desktop becomes more usable, it is boring. It's nothing but a second rate clone of windows. And I doin't use anything second rate so I went back to windows when XP came out.

    Make Linux cool again. Make it different and BETTER than windows and you will win me back but as for now why bother?

    Thanks

    --
    "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
    1. Re:Why do I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, what is your problem? is linux to stable for you? did you miss the drama of windows? do you get up in the morning and wonder, "will my computer crash today, and if so, will it be in the middle of that big progect that must be on the bosses desk first thing tommorow morning?" i don't care how "stable" windows XP may be, to me it is still another buggy crap OS that costs you a arm, leg, and left nut. besides i can get XP to crash on command. my linux distro may be old as dirt (caldara openlinux2.3), but how does that saying go, "if it isn't broke, don't fix it".

    2. Re:Why do I care? by moranar · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you do not want the mainstream desktops, you can get as excentric as you like.

      Tried Blackbox (or Fluxbox)? WindowMaker? Slicker? There are plenty of GUI options for Linux that look nothing like Microsoft's GUI.

      You can even easily modify KDE or GNOME so that they look nothing like the default.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
  66. I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recycle used computers, I have a contract with a *large* corporation to pick up their old PC's and other "goodies"..

    They wipe the drives in them, which is FINE with me, so I take them all and install Linux on them, clean them up like brand new and resell them at rock botton prices that EVERYONE can afford, with a 30 day warranty.

    I offer them only with Linux installed, take it or leave it. They are Internet appliances and they do a magnificent job of it, leaving the new owners to enjoy the computer without the headaches of using windows.

    I give them 15 minutes free instructions on using it, if they want FULL instructions then I set up an appointment and charge $20 an hour which is $15 an hour cheaper than anyone else in town charges.

    If they don't want Linux, that's tough. I don't offer any other options. They can install windows when they take it home but I won't help them if they have problems.

    Like it or not, people around here are getting introduced to Linux. They want a cheap computer, they get one but they are at least going to play with Linux a little before they wipe it out.
    But if they wipe out Linux and install anything else they void *my* 30 day warranty and they are own their own from them on..

    1. Re:I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      How do you work around win-modems?

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      http://www.linmodems.org/

      It's not 100% guaranteed every time but it takes care of the most of them...

    3. Re:I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      Any tips on getting contracts like that or is it just as simple as calling them up and asking? This sounds like something that people should be doing in every community.

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    4. Re:I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I put ads in the local papers that I pick up and recycle computer and electronic equipment.

      I offer my services free of charge. Everyone else charges money to pick up stuff. I do not. That THRILLS corporate customers to no end. They sign me up as their permanent "sucker" that they dump their old stuff on. And beleive me, I'm thrilled to get the stuff for free. It's almost always working equipment, just obsolete.

      So, I clean it up, service it, make it look like brand new, make it work like brand new and turn it around. Joe average can now get industrial grade equipment at garage sale prices. Work horse laser printers made in the USA that are designed to print 30,000 pages a month for $300 in brand new condition, where a Chinese made laserjet that is a POS and has a duty cycle of 1,000 pages a month and a 2 year life span for the same price.

      I just sold a PC with a 17" Compaq display, an HP color inkjet (US made!) speakers, etc, full package with Suse 9.0 installed for $300 to a guy that is thrilled to get a full system that cheap.
      And he's thrilled at the promise of a system that won't be plauged with the typical, never ending MS headaches. He's getting an internet appliance that is 100% reliable that will also handle his WP needs (Open Office 1.1)...

      This is just ONE example of a small time turn around. I have all sorts of goodies to suit any needs, I have a ROLM CBX II that I got for free, configured to handle 10,000 lines, a DG Calriion mini computer, two 18 wheeler loads of Compaq PC's, countless 21" monitors, even more countless numbers of 13-15-17" monitors, E size plotters, truckloads of laserjets, trailer loads of band printers, there's just no end to it. It's freaking insane. I have so much stuff that I can't walk around here. I have little tunnels to crawl through from room to room. I'm looking at getting a LARGE, climate controlled building to wharehouse this stuff as I process it and find new homes for it all. So far, very, very little of it has been broken, it all needs cleaning and minor service but it's all good stuff..

      So far, so good. I have the potential to turn this into a very good thing, if I don't fsck it up.

      Never in a million years would I have ever guessed that it would get like this. I just started doing this because I'm handicapped and un-employable otherwise. I wanted to do ANYTHING but get on SSI so I thought I would do a few PC's here and there to get by on. Damn! And the best thing is that this is something that I enjoy doing, I love working on stuff and I get to do it on my own terms..

      Fun, fun, fun!!

  67. Uneven comparison by Foolhardy · · Score: 1
    Nelson uses open-source software to run all 110 Riverdale student terminals.
    They go on to compare that to full Windows workstations. They are comparing workstations to an application server. Of course the app server will be cheaper. This is true regardless of Windows or Linux. Windows has Terminal Services. Is there some reason they couldn't compare apples to apples?
    1. Re:Uneven comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I've seen a network-boot windows terminal client running native windows. Is that possible? And if you are talking software costs you have to pay for all the same licences *plus* the client license.

    2. Re:Uneven comparison by Foolhardy · · Score: 1

      You can use the terminal client on Win98 and XP, both of which support booting from a bootp server, when configured correctly. If the computers can boot from CDs, you could make a Windows PE (pre-installation environment; search the web for bart pe) CD that will auto boot into the RDP client. You could even use Linux as the client with rdp.
      About licences, I don't think that MS charges anything for educational use. For commercial application however, the licences are expensive.

  68. Probably been done by ScarletEmerald · · Score: 1

    It is slightly outdated and probably not available in English but you could try to tranlate it via Babelfish and correct the mistakes.

    Heh, sometimes when reading linux docs I get the feeling that they were created using this very method!

    1. Re:Probably been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up! :)

  69. Revolutions by Chip+Wilson · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    "Every revolution evaporates and leaves behind only the slime of a new bureaucracy."

    -- Franz Kafka

  70. Why was slashdot mentioned? by crazyfreakid · · Score: 1

    answer: to get the article posted here. :)

  71. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The marks you saw on them after you threw them in the fire... they didn't look anything like the dark tounge of Mordor, by any chance, did they? Just wondering...

  72. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by bj8rn · · Score: 1

    Nay, they were of even more sinister origin, something so dark that even Melkor and Sauron, even when together, wouldn't dare to name it.

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  73. Microsoft Will Bring This On Itself by rgainford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I being a Microsoft croonie am sorry to say that I don't see this revolution of linux and freeBSD slowing down. I have always worked developing in microsofts products and their latest .Net platform is a pleasure to work with. That being said I also realize that the only reason Bill comes up with these development platforms is to increase his hold on the desktop market. Yet WHY then with the success of open-source software on the rise would they still be charging schools and university's for their products. This is where their user base is created from!! In addition this this fact( which bothers me immensly ) they have also come out with their latest aggravating anti-piracy tool "pain in the ass" activation. Now I can't even move my legal copy of XP from one computer to another without having to go through the activation process again. This is a big mistake in my opinion. I know there are already hacks for this feature but if they ever come out with a version of their operating system that can't be used illeagally I see them going down in FLAMES. If people in poor developing countries can't use their system to learn on along with the educational community in first world countries, there choke-hold on this industry will quickly be loosened.

  74. Where are these educators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    when a problem crops up, Nelson emails educators around the world, with answers arriving minutes later from Norway, North Portland or elsewhere.

    These Norwegian educators are pretty fucking enigmatic whenever I have a problem crop up.

  75. Wrong Joe! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    You have to have Linux meet Joe Porn Star. (http://www.joepornstar.com)

    Only then will Linux get anywhere...

  76. Your all communists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets do everything for free like linux. Down with capitalism and innovation, instead bring on a new age of confusing operating systems, Hooray for linux.

  77. Don't shove it down people's throats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't want to hear any Windows using moron say that I should use Windows.
    I think that most Windows users feel the same way about Linux.

  78. If You Were Paying Attention... by krmt · · Score: 1

    Dude, did someone take away your copy of fvwm or something? Mutt somehow just grew a GUI and started autoexecuting content? Are you now bored with LyX and want to go back to Microsoft Office? Does apt-get now only work through your web browser and only download certain pieces of software? Hell, even Gnome and KDE are doing interesting stuff these days if you've been paying attention. They've gone way past the "Windows Clone" stage, if they ever really were in one.

    Linux is still cool, and it gives you plenty of stuff to play with that's still a pain in the ass to get working in Windows (and even then, it's only going through cygwin). No one stopped the programs that were so different then from being different now. twm still works great here.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  79. Then by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't he at least post a paypal link on the website? I thought about just sending it to his Email address... but his backlog of Emails is probably months long.

    I *like* the tip-jar method of reimbursing folks for their work... I've done it with bittorent and other projects, and I'd like to do it with Knoppix.

    Seriously... that little live CD has saved my bacon a few times, in addition to being a handy party favor for non-geeks, and I have no problem showing a little gratitude.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  80. I wouldn't come back just yet by billybob · · Score: 1

    But if Portland is finally really becoming an IT hotbed ("Silicon Forest," and all that), I'd gladly move back.

    In case you haven't heard, here in Portland we have the nation's highest unemployment rate, nearly nine flipping percent. We've been like this for a while and it's not getting any better. I would not recommend anyone move here, particularly if you are in the IT field. That's been hit real hard, no matter what any "professionals" say otherwise.

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:I wouldn't come back just yet by Artifex · · Score: 1
      In case you haven't heard, here in Portland we have the nation's highest unemployment rate, nearly nine flipping percent.


      Yup. As I noted in my first post, I was laid off, there.
      That's why I'm surprised to see people thinking it's some kind of hotbed.

      So, are you unemployed?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    2. Re:I wouldn't come back just yet by descil · · Score: 1

      I lived in Portland and couldn't find a job anywhere, until I got a job offer from all the way in New York. Portland is filled with incredibly talented programmers, and yet no businesses seem to be catching on. What gives? Portland is ripe for picking, not to mention starving for it. If I had a chance, I'd move back in an instant.

    3. Re:I wouldn't come back just yet by billybob · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you very much :) But it took me 5 months to find my current job after quiting in disgust of my previous one. That's just not cool. I love Portland, it's a great place, but man I just don't get what's happened to the job market around here.

      --
      Joseph?
  81. OT: mod points (was Re:So many funny quotes) by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    Been getting mod points about once every two weeks for the last few months anyway. Whats up with that?

    I'm kind of curious as to how the Cowboy and the Commander handle this stuff as well. I get requests to metamod at least daily, but I haven't had any mod points for weeks and weeks. I used to get them about weekly or more.

    Strange. I halfway expect that if this post gets modded up a couple of points I'll start getting mod points again. Or maybe if it gets modded up, I'll never see metamod status again. Who knows what lurks in the minds of the Cowboy and Commander?

    1. Re:OT: mod points (was Re:So many funny quotes) by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Once you metamod once you will always be asked to metamod when you sign in. If you actually meta mod, you increase your karma slightly. This will result in you getting mod points faster. Getting moded up will help too as will just posting and not getting modded down. Delving into threads will make your chances better too. Lastly, letting mod points expire will mean that it will take longer to get the next set.

      It might be that if you got too many negative metamods then you might be banned, but if that were the case then your karma would be lousy too.

      Once you have good karma, the best way to get mod points is to metamod. After a week or two of metamoding and you will start getting mod points.

      Most of this is in the FAQ, but somme came from IRC chat logs of Taco, and from Robin when he gave a presentation at our LUG.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:OT: mod points (was Re:So many funny quotes) by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I do think that is how it works now, it appears to be different (Ive been here a while). I think they may change the ratio to give 'receiving' points a bonus toward when you get to give them, and I usually get several points a week (capped out years ago). I metamoderate about 3 to 4 times a week, same as I visit. I find I mark alot of Troll, Offtopic and Redundant mods as Unfair. Lots of moderators get too worried about specifics that way.

      Also, when I have points, I don't use user/over or the other mods that cant be metamoderated, and I almost never mod down, instead focusing on only moding good stuff up. I never moderate my own Friends or Fans, to stay unbiased. I wonder if that matters. I have been getting points twice a month for quite a while now.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  82. Michael Jackson by crayiii · · Score: 1

    I heard that after seeing the IBM commercial Michael Jackson ordered all computers in the "Jackson camp" to switch immediately to the "little boy system".

  83. Make a deal with AOL by crayiii · · Score: 1

    How about making a deal with AOL. Create a bootable CD (Knoppix" that will run AOL so a user just boots the CD and can get online with AOL. AOL can start sending this CD out so new users get to try AOL and Linux out.

    1. Re:Make a deal with AOL by zobier · · Score: 1

      As much as I find AOL unpleasant - this is a pretty good idea as your current set-up is not infected by AOL.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  84. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? No, just casual lusrs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup:

    Lots a' casual lusrs. It's 2004 & *nix just works.

  85. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visual Basic?

  86. I've been dreaming of that day for a while now by freeweed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if they ever come out with a version of their operating system that can't be used illeagally(sic) I see them going down in FLAMES

    I went back to University a few years ago and am just finishing up once again. The level of software piracy around here absolutely astounds me. As a personal goal, I've spent the past couple of years trying to rid myself entirely of any software that isn't 100% legit (whether it's free "educational" MS product, or OSS, or whatever). The time I sometimes spend trying to get work done is frustrating (need to print something that isn't in a University-approved file format? ie: anything not a Word doc or PDF?), but the personal satisfaction is worth it.

    I rant almost daily about professors requiring us to hand in our work with MS-specific file formats, and my fellow classmates yawn and hand me a warezed copy of MS Office. OpenOffice is SO close, but still not 100% (as I learned after initially receiving a 0 on an assignment - thankfully the prof was understanding and let me re-submit it).

    I really, REALLY would like to see upcoming versions of Windows and Office be 100% unpiratable. Most students I know aren't going to be shelling out hundreds of dollars to keep up with software when there's a free alternative that does what they need just fine. Give it a few years, and we'd have an entire school generation almost entirely unexposed to Microsoft's software. Other than games (about 99% of which are also pirated, incidentally), I just can't see Joe Student *needing* Windows, to the tune of paying for software licenses for it.

    Hell, I've seen students fire up Visual Studio .NET to write and compile a 20-line console program using only standard C libraries. Apparently gcc is "too much typing" for them. I say, bring on working copy-protection for all commercial software, please! And yes, I do realize what a pipe dream this is :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  87. Why I Switched from Windows to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, the reason I use Linux now is because I had a "showstopper" in Windows ME. Every month, I would get continuous BSODs with an error code. After re-installing Windows, I'd look for the error code and find out it meant the equivalent of "check engine." Someone told me about Linux, I installed Mandrake. It hasn't always worked, and I had to learn about rpms and about winmodems, but it's been a much, much less frustrating experience, since there actually was a FM to RTFM! Now, my system is stable, and has been from the second month I've had Mandrake. If I was still using Windows, I'd have had to pay for an upgrade and I'd still be getting random, unidentifiable BSODs.
    In short, I tried because Windows wouldn't work, and Mandrake was free to try and easy and friendly to use. I switched because Mandrake Linux worked and Windows didn't.

  88. Portland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have family in Portland and go there several times a year.
    Portland is ground zero to runaway teens, dope-heads, time-warped hippies, and most of the commie scum of the earth.
    As for any kind of "digital revolution", I can't say I've seen anything that supports that view... unless you include open-source zealots in the "commie scum of the earth" category.
    Intel has offices there. That's about all I can think of.

  89. Still didn't quote me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like slashdot - my comments to the author were below the article threshold. I met the author at a sushi resturant with several others. I was not in the third of the room quoted in the article.

    I go to the local LUG meetings so I actually have met or had a beer with most of the people interviewed for the article. Since it was a cover story the writer had two weeks to write the thing. There are still more Linux people in Portland than he could interview.

  90. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by bj8rn · · Score: 1

    By uttering these words, you have, unfortunately, failed to scare me. But still, I guess you shall burn in some circle of hell for trying. And don't think your AC cover will save ya!

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  91. Portland schools have no money by jdictionary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't get me wrong, I am definitely pro Linux and use it on a daily basis, but what this article fails to mention is that Portland public schools have no money. Portland has had to cancel all kinds of extracurricular programs, shorten the school year, layoff teachers, etc. Most of the sports programs require the players to purchase their own equipment (for example). The local economy is hurting big time. Portland and Oregon as a whole has had some of the highest unemployment in the nation in past months. So it makes me wonder if the big Linux push at some of the schools is really because they are so "anti Microsoft", etc. or it is out of desperation because they can't afford anything else. Don't forget, Microsoft is headquartered only 180 miles north of Portland and employs several thousand people. I have many friends that have moved up there to take jobs with them. A lot of the contract tech jobs you can find in Portland are for Microsoft. So I think this whole anti-Microsoft thing is blown way out of proportion by articles such as this. Just my two cents.

    1. Re:Portland schools have no money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what this article fails to mention is that Portland public schools have no money.

      Well, Portland schools have money because Multnomah County passed an income tax a few months ago.

      Everywhere else in the state (including many Portland suburb school districts) is shit broke because Oregonians would rather complain about how the schools are broke than do something about it and vote to pay for them.

      I'll be voting yes for the temporary State income tax increase on Tuesday (AGAIN). Will you?

  92. Turnabout is fair play by gumpish · · Score: 1
    Free speech does not exist in Portland unless your speech happens to appear on the approved "progressive dogma" list.
    Perhaps you haven't heard of your precious President Bush's Free Speech Zones.
  93. Last year, I saw Harrison by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    and co, present their LTSP system using those words at the committee hearing for HB2892. (Oregon Open Source bill)

    Got a lot of nods from the members of the legislature present. Too bad the industry lobby worked Minnis over....

    Anyway, I like it too.

  94. Re:You are a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shfted! (600189) got it right: 18.3kB worth of text on one page--instead of spread across 4 pages.

    gewg_

  95. Pronouncing Linux by kasperd · · Score: 1

    The article says Linux (pronounced "LINN-ix"). That is incorrect. In the samples you can download from kernel.org you can hear Linus pronouncing Linux.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  96. Re:see him running Mozilla&think, I'd like tha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >You only rarely head over to a buddy's and see him running Mozilla instead of IE
    >and think, hmm, I'd like that and didn't know about it.

    They come over to ME and see a familiar page without popup ads & irritation animated GIFs.
    When I tell them I didn't have to download & install Toggle Images.exe
    or download & install a popup blocker--that those are native--they are interested.

    When I show them Ctrl+ makes the text bigger, that really gets 'em.

  97. Re:Screw Joe Average by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    It's a fine line between something that is designed to encourage discussion and flamebait. Honestly, I don't know which side of the line my post was. Thing is, I don't care. I'm paid to care about just over 20 staff computers and just over 160 student computers. Fortunately all the friends and family close enough to ask me for help with computers are more than computer literate enough to avoid getting their PC infected, regardless of the OS it runs.

  98. Re:World class in: Bookstores, Art dealers, Parks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's probably no accident that he and the The Open Source Development Lab are in Portland.

    Linus doesn't actually live here. He still lives in San Jose.

    Portland has the largest bookstore in the world.

    Powell's always bills itself as "the largest used and new bookstore in the world". They always include that phrase "used and new", leading me to believe that there is actually a larger new-only bookstore somewhere else. But I don't know for sure.

    Portland has the largest park inside a city in the world.

    Not only that, we have the smallest city park, too! 452 square inches!

  99. Just to set things straight. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    When IBM has ads for something it is in the mainstream.
    When Wall Street start us an OS it is the mainstream.
    When Intel writes software for an OS it is mainstream.
    Linux is no longer alternative or on the fringe.
    The revolution is over and we won and maybe we lost as well. Time to move on to Hurd, Plan 9, or something totaly new, our job here is done.
    Of course Linux is now useful, stable, and easy to use.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  100. Portland.... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything...

    ...but many of us wish it was.

  101. Ot: Gandhi by Vintermann · · Score: 1

    "Nonviolence as a technique is often based on direct confrontation, even to the extent of provoking it."

    In other words, as a means to and end. That's Gandhi for you. For all his mild manners he was still a Jain, and their tradition is consequentialist to the core. For some reason I have more respect for the likes of Henry David Thoreau, who went to jail not to set an example, not because he thought it would make a whit of a difference in the war in Mexico, but because it was the Right Thing.

    I suppose I'm one of those old fashioned passive un-dynamic pacifists then, because having effective methods isn't what's first on my mind. That said, I think people will be more inclined to listen when they percieve you to be acting directly out of conscience, as opposed to as part of political strategy.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  102. Will Linux make it to average user's desktop? by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

    More and more, all of the easy-for-a-newbie to install and use distros cost money. Libranet $75; Lindows $50 and you have a membership in their click 'n run to have any software on the system (it's as stripped-down as Windows); XandrOS is $40 and now Lycoris'latest Amethyst 3 that you find at DistroWatch.com is a trial evaluation. So if all the easy distros cost money, will Linux ever succeed at providing an alternative to Windows for average users?

    There are still a few; Mandrake is pretty easy to install and use, although not as friendly to Windows-refugees as Lycoris or Lindows (I haven't tried XandrOS myself, so I can't comment). SuSE is still pretty easy, but I personally feel that it's not quite as easy as Mandrake, even though it's my favorite. Another good one is Ark, but most people have never heard of it (yet).

    IMNSHO Linux won't make it very far to the computers of the average user if this trend continues. Many potential Linux-newbies bought computers with Windows pre-installed and they don't want to pay even more money for Linux. Most of the commercial distros don't even have a trial or live cd; you have to just take their word for it that you'll love thier distro much more than Windows. Is it worth the risk from their standpoint? I don't think so.

    Do any of the hackers out there care enough to make a distro for newbies (not necessarily a Windows look-a-like) and keep it free? I hope so, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --
    I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.