Slashdot Mirror


What's the Point of Building a Home Theater PC?

An anonymous reader writes "FiringSquad has written Building a Basic HTPC. They discuss why Building a HTPC only makes sense if it can do something better than any other commercially available solution, as well as why HTPC should integrate act like a component not a computer. They also go into upsampling of DVDs to HDTV."

358 comments

  1. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Building a Basic HTPC
    February 03, 2004

    Summary: You've read about building no-budget Dual Opteron workstations, and RAID-less storage servers and even air filters at FiringSquad. Today we'll be looking at Building a Basic Home Theater PC. If you're thinking Small Form Factor ATX, you haven't learned anything from our previous articles. This HTPC is designed for two purposes only: high-definition upsampling of DVD video and personal video recording. If you ever wondered how DVD's can look better when brought to HDTV resolutions even though the source is the same, read inside.

    Introduction Page:: ( 1 / 10 )

    The HTPC or "Home Theater PC" is a popular but often nebulous concept. Everyone would agree that a fundamental component is that the pc be connected to a television but what the HTPC is used for is something to debate. Some people use a HTPC to play games on the big screen, while others see it as a way to enjoy high-quality DVD, others see it as a music/video/image jukebox, and still others see it as a way to get a low-cost HDTV by using a desktop monitor rather than TV.

    The problem with having a HTPC doing multiple tasks is that it becomes more difficult to integrate the software and yet your wallet gets thinner and thinner. Instead of starting off with a full-fledged HTPC, we're going to start with a very introductory approach to the HTPC and then through follow-up articles, add more features.

    For this introductory HTPC article, we have two very specific tasks: DVD upsampled to HDTV resolutions, and a personal TV recorder. Since we're "lazy," our HTPC needs to perform like a real piece of home theater equipment as much as possible. The system should integrate itself seamlessly, and shouldn't force the user to think about it as a computer. The HTPC also has to have an advantage over a similar dedicated component ? there's no point in reinventing the wheel unless you can make it faster, smaller, and cheaper.

    Why these two tasks?

    We've designed this system as an ideal starting point for anyone with a "HDTV ready" television.

    Having a PC-based TIVO is ideal for a number of reasons. The most important factor is cost. Both TIVO and ReplayTV charge a subscription fee and ridiculous premiums for larger hard drives. With a PC, you can add and replace IDE hard drives on a whim and also enjoy free TV listings. In addition, it is possible to enjoy higher quality video through a PC-based system through improved video scaling than would otherwise be possible with a standard unit.

    Finally, ATI and other third-party software applications have media server applications that will allow their multimedia products to stream video to client systems on your desktop, and NVIDIA is expected to add this capability to its Personal Cinema line in the near future.

    The upsampled DVD is the more important feature in our HTPC today. Even if cost is no object, the HTPC approach to DVD can offer better picture quality than any stand-alone unit. DVDs are recorded with 480 lines of resolution, however it turns out that upsampling the video to a 720p or 1080i resolution for HDTV and HDTV-ready televisions will offer the best quality.

    It's a real phenomenon

    One of the most often confused concepts is the idea that upsampling DVDs to HDTV resolutions will make DVDs look as good as HDTV. It doesn't seem as if this is possible -- the data is not present to begin with. The real answer is that while an upsampled DVD isn't as good as true HDTV, it will look better than a straight 480 progressive lines of resolution. Here's why?

    HDTV-ready CRT

    Like a CRT PC monitor, an HDTV-ready CRT can sync at multiple resolutions. The catch is that the electron beam is not designed to change in size depending on the resolution (it changes but not by design). Suppose you have a 19" monitor running at 1280x1024 or 1600x1200. While reading this webpage, look at the white background. Get as close to the screen as you can to study the white. dy

    1. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      That's clipped, there's a complete version here

    2. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      err... That's clipped, there's a complete version here

    3. Re:Article text by mindriot · · Score: 1

      But you forgot the most important line from the article! See the headline:

      Building a Basic HTPC
      Home > Guides > Choosing Components
      February 03, 2004 Alan /.effect Dang > [View My Other Articles]

      Makes you wonder whether he was out to destroy this server...

    4. Re:Article text by kinzillah · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The complete text can also be read here with no problems.

      There must be a law that says people only mirror or post the text of articles on sites that aren't being slashdotted.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
  2. I Suppose it could be better than TV by cb8100 · · Score: 1

    If you've already got the (huge) monitor sitting around, then you may as well go for it. Plus, you can make your own DVR that would be integrated with your "TV."

    --
    My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    1. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by El · · Score: 2, Informative

      I seriously doubt if anybody has a monitor bigger than my 42" HDTV-ready projection TV... plus, using a computer as a platform usually means you have to put up with fan noise; it should be possible to build a consumer electronics device that silent (although Sony seems to insist on putting fans in theirs).

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose you have bittorrent and they send AVI and QT instead of DVD...

    3. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by justMichael · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get a quiet PC, you can find one here

    4. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      With careful component choice, a little moding, and some 3rd party help you can quiet an existing pc (or build a quiet one from scratch)

      witness yoshi's quiet PC from the screensavers/techtv.

      *shrug* Now it's probably underpowered for this fancy upscanning stuff the guy in the article wanted to do, but you can get fanless mini-itx via epia boards

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    5. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by MrBlint · · Score: 1, Insightful
      imho windows based PCs are pretty poorly adapted to serve as the main TV set, DVD player etc.

      First there are the physical aspects such as display contrast, fan noise and the noise given off by most DVD drives. These can be fixed but only if you spend more money on parts.

      Then there are the software related problems such as the virus scanner kicking in or windows update needing attention or performance problems caused by heap fragmentation etc... this always happens at a crucial point in the drama. You can disable all this auto updating but then all the routine houskeeping has to be added to the list of inconveniences compared to traditional AV gear

      I also have a half baked theory that the PC architecture is not capable of properly synchronizing sound and video due to the sound card and video card being seperately clocked. Hence the little glitches that occur in both when watching AV material on a PC. Maybe somebody with more technical knowledge of PC internals can enlighten me on this.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  3. FPS by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Funny

    Building a HTPC only makes sense if it can do something better than any other commercially available solution...

    Two words: Half Life.

    1. Re:FPS by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm from that school of nerd that wonders:

      "If I have a computer, why would I care about television?"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:FPS by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      do you mean television the equiptment or television the institution?

    3. Re:FPS by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Interesting
      do you mean television the equiptment or television the institution?
      I mean the entire category of slack-jawed viewing without a keyboard.
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigger goatse!

    5. Re:FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you've never watched the history or SciFi channels.

    6. Re:FPS by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      "I mean the entire category of slack-jawed viewing without a keyboard."

      What is the difference between slackjawed viewing with a keyboard and without?

      :P

    7. Re:FPS by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      One is a form of I/O, the other only a form of Input.

      "Sit there and enjoy your 'programming' couch-sludge."

      --
      ---
    8. Re:FPS by PyromanFO · · Score: 1

      Not if you're just viewing ...

    9. Re:FPS by Thuktun · · Score: 2

      I mean the entire category of slack-jawed viewing without a keyboard.

      A remote control is really just a wireless keyboard.

    10. Re:FPS by ThomK · · Score: 1

      Ummmm TechTV?

      --

      TK

    11. Re:FPS by sharkey · · Score: 1
      "If I have a computer, why would I care about television?"

      Now that Jennicam is gone, you have to find something else as mind-numbingly time-wasting and boring?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:FPS by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      Building a HTPC only makes sense if it can do something better than any other commercially available solution...

      Two words: Half Life.


      I always think one word when people ask this: MAME!

      (and yes I already have an mame arcade cabinet... but I can't get enough mame on enough devices in my house! =P)

      E.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    13. Re:FPS by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Me, too. That's why I still have cable internet, and watch streaming video and DVD's on my home PC theatre. The TV/vcr get hardly any use at all, though sometimes I turn it on to get the hydravision effect, usually when guests are over.

    14. Re:FPS by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      One word: Xbox. :-)

      I have become a bit of a skeptic on the "all-in-one" solution. I have a separate cable box, dvd player, amp, and display - it makes the pain (in the wallet, that is) a little more tolerable when adding something new (progressive-scan dvd) or (*whimper*) getting rid of something old, like the Laserdisc player I finally disconnected.

  4. umm, price?! by Glog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The point, Taco, is price. Why should I pay $2000 when I can have it for $200 in parts. Plus, there are plenty to people who get more enjoyment out of building something themselves.

    1. Re:umm, price?! by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Price is not a good reason to build an HTPC unless you're willing to make a whole bunch of compromises and don't care about aesthetics.

      I priced out what it would take me to build a minimally-decent HTPC system, accounting for the specialized case (quiet, small, looks like it's an HT component), motherboard (because full-size ATX wouldn't fit in that case), processor, memory, decent TV capture cards, hard drive, DVD burner, etc. Hint: It wasn't $200. More like $700.

    2. Re:umm, price?! by baywulf · · Score: 1

      For $200 in parts you will get a shitty video card and poor sound quality.

    3. Re:umm, price?! by Glog · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I just came up with the numbers ... in principle it will always be cheaper to build your own than buy any of the commercial solutions. Besides, price is not the major point here.

    4. Re:umm, price?! by rjelks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe it wouldn't make as much sense if you are truely building from scratch, but this is slashdot. How many peeps here don't have a basement/closet full of spare parts. If you have a box sitting around, it's much cheaper than say a replayTV or MCE Windoze box. Part of building your own is the fun. Aside from that, you can cusomize your own box a lot more than a tivo or replaytv. Mame anyone? Check out MythTV for a cool OSS project or MyHtpc.net for a really cool, community driven front-end. For an all around informative site about hardware, and mostly windows frontend software, check out ruel.net It's more tweaking and screwing around, but more adaptable too.

    5. Re:umm, price?! by mekkab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In actuality, a lot of slashdotters have found the price to be about what it would cost to go with a store bought solution. So I challenge you to spec out a system that functions as good as the store bought and is cheaper.

      The major point is builders pride. You do it because you love the doing.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    6. Re:umm, price?! by ryanr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right. I did a chapter on HTPCs recently for "Hardware Hacking: Have Fun While Voiding Your Warranty". IMHO, the two reasons for building your own HTPC are aesthetics and control. The latter meaning that you don't anyone else deciding how your commercial skip will work, or what you will and won't be allowed to network.

      Generally speaking, you won't be able to build a custom HTPC for less money than a commercial HTPC(-like) device with the exact same functions.

    7. Re:umm, price?! by Znork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what I've seen it's quite a bit more expensive to roll my own decent solution.

      The advantage from my own linux based solution is I have a shitload of features ranging from being able to back it up, remote in via ssh to adding any number of capture cards and disks I wish into it.

      The selling point of building it yourself is flexibility.

      The disadvantages are price and, of course, having to know a fair amount about computers to get it working.

    8. Re:umm, price?! by justMichael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My major points are being able to play my music collection through the same box and MAME.

      I have a few hundred CDs sitting in boxes, I would like to keep them there and listen to the ripped versions.

      When somebody builds a box that can do both of those on top of what they do now, I'm in.

    9. Re:umm, price?! by Otter · · Score: 1
      ...in principle it will always be cheaper to build your own than buy any of the commercial solutions.

      Err, what "principle" is that based on?

    10. Re:umm, price?! by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      Uh, buy an xbox and chip it and replace the HD.

    11. Re:umm, price?! by matt_wall · · Score: 1

      damn right. I got an old PC i had lying around and hooked it up to my TV. These $2000 media centers are great, but you could do the same thing with a normal computer. besides, you could pay $2000 for a high end computer and watch movies on it.

    12. Re:umm, price?! by Glog · · Score: 1

      The same principle that it's usually cheaper to build a decent box than buy it from Dell.

    13. Re:umm, price?! by mekkab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So the big issues are: 1) having 1 box that does it, or 3 boxes
      2) components you already have

      Consider: 100 cd carousel, console with one of those "30+ classic atari games!", and an AV receiver to combine the sound sources (A, B, or A+B). (those carousels go for $60 these days, a console can go from $300 down to nothing if used, and a receiver can be anywhere from $1000 to under $100, depending upon your needs).

      If you already have a lot of these components, this set up can satisfy most of your requirements.
      But if you want this all on ONE box, then there is only one way to go: Custom set-up.

      As for the computer solution, playing ripped music (Wavs, Flac, MP3, WTF) and playing MAME are not really processor intensive- so whatever machine you have lying around might be great. All you need is a half decent sound card (if you don't need Dolby 5.1, then most cheap soundblasters will do ya!) and a half decent videocard with some TV out (does your TV take composite? Coax? S-video?). And an $80 harddrive from Compusa (maybe 2 if you don't go for MP3).
      So thats like, $250, $300 for HD, soundcard and video card?

      Which is cheap, but the above setup can be just as cheap.

      In this case, (no PVR) the Computer solution might be cheaper than a PVR solution (due to the limited demands on the computer) and it satisfies the 1 box requirement. So thats a win.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    14. Re:umm, price?! by justMichael · · Score: 1

      I may do that when the price gets to the $99-125 range. Then I can play Xbox games as well.

      But it still looks like an Xbox. The hush boxes are very nice to look at, even if they are a little pricey.

    15. Re:umm, price?! by drooling-dog · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Generally speaking, you won't be able to build a custom HTPC for less money than a commercial HTPC(-like) device with the exact same functions.

      True, but you'll be able to modify and/or upgrade it any way you want, whenever you want, without worrying about the warranty (since there is none)...

    16. Re:umm, price?! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Can't add a TV tuner to an Xbox. It'll play games and videos, but no way to record.

    17. Re:umm, price?! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yup...more flexibility as your hardware and software needs change. You can buy the extra stuff for the Tivo..to allow mp3 playing. However, on my media box I'm building (went for audio first), I can more easily control my rips...and their format. For my home system, I wanted lossless compression, so, I went for FLAC. This isn't an option on commercial systems that I'm aware of. And as the technology improves...I can upgrade as I please.

      So, it gives you much more FREEDOM now and in the future. When I get my whole system built some day...I can at will, stream my media around to anywhere in the house...house all my audio/video media on a central, backed up server...etc. Something I really don't forsee as options with a commercially available system. And...no DRM.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:umm, price?! by ryanr · · Score: 1

      True, but you'll be able to modify and/or upgrade it any way you want, whenever you want, without worrying about the warranty (since there is none)... ...riiight... which is the point I was making in the post you replied to.

    19. Re:umm, price?! by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Price is not a good reason to build an HTPC unless you're willing to make a whole bunch of compromises and don't care about aesthetics.

      I started to read this article not because I wanted to build a full-blown HTPC, but because I have a tv tuner/capture card in a machine, and am willing to add software to make a TV->SVCD converter. (I'm not an audiophile, so I'd rather burn to CD if I want to watch a TV show -- In my case, I'm building a glorified digital VCR.) Building a full-blown HTPC sounds impressive, and is more article worthy then what I'll eventually do, which is probably why we see articles about building an HTPC, instead of how to build a simple digital VCR.

      I priced out what it would take me to build a minimally-decent HTPC system, accounting for the specialized case (quiet, small, looks like it's an HT component), motherboard (because full-size ATX wouldn't fit in that case), processor, memory, decent TV capture cards, hard drive, DVD burner, etc. Hint: It wasn't $200. More like $700.

      An Antec Sonata case runs about $100 new, with PS, and isn't that ugly. TV capture can be picked up for 50. Decent video out cards run about $50, used, if you don't have one lying around. The rest of the components a geek has laying around the house.

    20. Re:umm, price?! by Trelane · · Score: 1

      The advantage price-wise is for Dell. You only order, at most, a few pieces of hardware. Dell orders thousands (at a bulk discount). Dell buys lower down on the supply chain, you have to buy from some variety of store (at a markup for the middlemen).

      However, the problem with Dell is that it's crap, just like every other vendor (been soured on vendors after having recently tried to buy a new laptop, all of 'em sucked). Well, crap is perhaps too strong a term; you have significantly less flexibility and control of the part vendor and part choice if you go with a preboxed solution. Your other advantage is that you don't have to pay employees.

      From a pure cost perspective, I think it leans towards Dell's advantage (I don't have exact data).

      Considering cost + additional, I only want to build my own systems. That's not available for every type of system (e.g. laptops), or every type of person.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    21. Re:umm, price?! by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree on asthetics, anyways. My main reason for building a HTPC is simple: I already have all the components through other means and aquisitions, with the exception of an LCD projector. $500 on eBay, and I have a full theater.

      I don't care about asthetics for two reasons: 1) the system will be behind the main seating area in a cupboard that's closed (but vented to avoid overheating issues), and 2) when I'm watching a movie, I'm actually watching the movie, not the equipment. Sure, when I get bored with a show, I may gaze at the equipment from time to time, but not necessarily when I'm at my own place. It's more to see what other people are using.

    22. Re:umm, price?! by abhisarda · · Score: 1

      I don't even prefer a pc anymore. Forget home theatre pc's.
      I value mobility way more than high end video cards and expandibility. And the fact that I don't like crt's.
      Thats why I stick to a laptop. Price is initally higher but so is its resale value.

    23. Re:umm, price?! by CatOne · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your $50 capture card and your $50 video card aren't going to perform well -- so the device will work like crap.

      And you have a DVD burner lying around the house? Nice!

    24. Re:umm, price?! by justMichael · · Score: 1

      Currently the only things keeping me from building a MythTV box are time and money, babies tend to burn a lot of both.

      Although I may need the PVR functionality now, as my wife has been re-introduced to Cowboy Bebop, there appears to be some decent stuff on Adult Swim in the middle of the night.

      I already have the 5.1 sound. I don't want to have to deal with a carousel (eventually I will outgrow it), the best case is RIP it, put it away and never touch it again.

      I have my eye on the hush box I likned to a little further up...

    25. Re:umm, price?! by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Warranties are for the kind of people who sidle into the repair shop with their plastic waving frantically.

      I specifically look for 'distressed' items and equipment when I am at the auction, because I know how to repair most of it and there are always the usual tards there who can't, so I get things for almost free often enough.

      --
      ---
    26. Re:umm, price?! by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny, I was ablwe to get a case (coolermaster HTC-620) for $80.00 the motherboard+processor for $90.00 a mpeg2 capture card (AverMedia M175) for $80.00 + a hard drive and spending only 1 8 hour period on a sunday when I would be screwing around anyways to install slackware+mythtv on it to get something that is 100% impossible with ANY purchaseable DVR on the market. the ability to export video to any format I want (xvid for my laptop mostly) or burn to SVCD/DVD for less than $350.00

      Yes I used a motherblard that has a soldered on processor... whoopdie doo. yes I have to use a $40.00 scan converter dongle that doesnt give me 1080i HDTV quality... but nothing else does and it looks as good as that TiVO it's setting next to (and is replacing)

      I suggest you get a better source for your hardware and make realistic decisions (128 meg of ram is PLENTY people! no you dont need 7.1 surround sound + 600 gig of hard drive space and 3.4 ghz processor)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    27. Re:umm, price?! by DonGar · · Score: 1

      There are several store bought solutions to play music from your computer via the network, though most of them are expensive. One of them is a TiVo with Home Media Option. However, be careful, since not all models support HMO.

      MAME is generally not available store bought for reasons that are unfortunate, but which should be obvous.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    28. Re:umm, price?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i took a different approach... The PC itself is in a closet near the living room, no need for a small-scale case or the problems it entails. A wirless keyboard and mouse work as the perfect remote controls...

      the only expense i had was $50 for the wireless set plus the cost of 360gb worth of hard disks. the rest was all junk i had laying around.

      but then, my htpc has no tv tuner, everything i want is on bittorrent & various other p2p's why waste time with network televsion?

    29. Re:umm, price?! by Thuktun · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, but you'll be able to modify and/or upgrade it any way you want, whenever you want, without worrying about the warranty (since there is none)...

      Once one voids the warranty by opening the unit, the issue of worrying about the warranty is neatly resolved.

    30. Re:umm, price?! by PunkKangaroo · · Score: 2, Informative
      I just barely built one for about $420 or so with the following specs:
      • AMD Athlon XP 1800
      • Some micro-ATX MSI motherboard (I forget the exact model)
      • 256 megs of RAM
      • Yuan MPG600 tuner/capture card
      • GeForce 4 MX440 (for TV out)
      • Western Digital 160 Gig hard drive
      • Antect Minuet micro-ATX case (it's a beautiful case and fits in perfectly in anyone's home theater)
      • Extra case fan and anything else I can't think of off the top of my head
      It's runs MythTV on Gentoo Linux and works perfectly (although it took some time to work out the bugs with the Yuan card). If anyone has a spare computer around give Myth a shot. It's a pretty impressive open source project. I've still got some stuff to finish configuring but before long I'll hopefully be playing Chrono Trigger with my XBox controllers after I looked up the weather and decided it was too cold to go out (but only after queueing up the television programs I want to record for the week). ;)
    31. Re:umm, price?! by Eccles · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you have a DVD burner lying around the house? Nice!

      It should be pointed out that ReplayTV and TiVo devices generally don't have DVD writers either. Even those that do -- for substantially higher prices -- may not allow much flexibility in editing or authoring the DVD. So if you're comparing build-your-own DVR to commercial ones, a DVD burner isn't part of the equation.

      That said, I capitulated and bought a ReplayTV, which my six year old uses with aplomb. (Her only disappointment was when I informed her that it did not have infinite capacity, and thus old shows weren't kept forever.)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    32. Re:umm, price?! by iceperson · · Score: 1

      So you can build a better laptop than Dell for less $$$? Teach me please.

    33. Re:umm, price?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      spare parts? So you just happen to have one or two capture cards just lying around...a 100GB or larger hard drive....a DVD rom...a proc ~= 1.5Ghz or up...and a motherboard/ram to match? You have these kind of spare parts lying around?

      I've built a mythTV system and it is NOT cool or easy. It took me two months to setup my first one and a month to setup my latest one. DVD ripping/playing isn't exactly point and click on Linux...neither is selecting a capture card that just works. the most popular hardware based capture cards like PVR-250/350 use a driver called ivtv and it doesn't work side by side with bttv...which kinda screws you over if you want two capture cards on the same box (so I had to do the multinode route but it's unstable doing that). And dolby digital output with optical cabling and finding both a driver and a frontend (no xine doesn't work with every card) that support dolby digital pass through is another story entirely.

      MythTV is on version 0.13 for a reason! It's cool if you know how to set it up right...and yes I did have to modify code on the slave node just to get it to work right (it didn't initialize my PCTV Pro card correctly).

      But if you where being real about the spare parts thing...send some my way...because all my "spare parts" are from the 486 days.

    34. Re:umm, price?! by dbc001 · · Score: 1
      specialized case (quiet, small, looks like it's an HT component), motherboard (because full-size ATX wouldn't fit in that case)

      I always figured that when I get my "HT" system ready for display, that I would go to a pawn shop and buy the nicest looking piece of junk stereo equipment I can find. In fact, I would ask for one that looks nice but doesnt work, hopefully to save on cash. Then do some quick and dirty case modding, and squeeze my computer (complete with silent cooling system) into an old CD player or something. Actually it probly won't be quick...
    35. Re:umm, price?! by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Yes. Well, Dell builds it for cheaper. Selling it is a different matter. I can build a $700 computer that will completely and utterly blow away Dell's comparable offerings.

      Computer manufacturers like profit. Their computers typically have a good CPU, but everything else is utter crap. For sub $1000 computers, its always onboard video, 256 ram, crappy mobo, etc.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    36. Re:umm, price?! by thinksnow · · Score: 1

      So why not just get a MediaMVP for $99 and call it done?

      Hey look, my first post!

    37. Re:umm, price?! by egghat · · Score: 1

      Flexibilty is the real reason for building it yourself.

      Stuck with single speed DVD-R in your DVD recorder that you have bought for USD 1000 a year ago? Stuck with a 40 GB drive? Stuck with no time-shifting? Not with your HTPC. Throw-Away vs. upgradebility: Worth the time IMHO.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  5. myHTPC r0x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    even my wife loves it

    1. Re:myHTPC r0x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      TROLL ALERT!!!



      wife!??! not on slashdot...
    2. Re:myHTPC r0x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She meant "husband".

      ObOnTopic: why an HTPC? Because you can get the videos from BitTorrent for free and not hassle with re-doing them into MPEG DVD or VCD/SVCD.

  6. Well, why not? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have the computer experience, why not build a Home Theater PC? It's fun to do (if that sort of thing is fun to you), and it *can* cost less than a commercial model with the same features, especially if you equip a lot of features into the system. Besides, if the PC can also serve as a PVR or other cool functions, then it's a doubly-good deal.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Well, why not? by beefneck9 · · Score: 0

      I won't be doing it any time soon. I'd have been pissed off if I couldn't have watched the Best Super Bowl ever and Janet's half time show hit its 'peak' on my HTPC. All because some lacky using MyDoom hijacked my computer to beat up SCO.

    2. Re:Well, why not? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      I won't be doing it any time soon. I'd have been pissed off if I couldn't have watched the Best Super Bowl ever and Janet's half time show hit its 'peak' on my HTPC. All because some lacky using MyDoom hijacked my computer to beat up SCO.

      there is only yourself to blame... ;-)

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    3. Re:Well, why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built a p3 800 box that plays my son's harry potter games, plays mp3's, any type of video in existance, and has an ATI tv card in it.

      It is a pvr, game machine, music box, dvd player, dvd burner, internet terminal, and file server. All for under $600.

      beat that with a Tivo.

    4. Re:Well, why not? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I won't be doing it any time soon. I'd have been pissed off if I couldn't have watched the Best Super Bowl ever and Janet's half time show hit its 'peak' on my HTPC. All because some lacky using MyDoom hijacked my computer to beat up SCO."

      Next time...don't use windows....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Well, why not? by pla · · Score: 1

      Besides, if the PC can also serve as a PVR or other cool functions, then it's a doubly-good deal.

      I think that point matters the most, to those of us who can roll our own...

      Let's consider price-vs-functionality...

      A Tivo or ReplayTV will set you back around $200, not counting a few hundred more for their subscription service. So let's say a nice round $500 for something that will remain useful for the next five years. A mid-range TV, such as my household recently purchased (30" HDTV 16:9), $1000. A decent DVD player, $200. Add in a 6.1 surround decoder, and tolerable-but-low-end speakers, and you have another $500. Total of around $2200, and it only has TV, DVDs, and PVR capabilities (plus basic audio functionality, such as radio and CD playing).

      For a PC... The TV you really still need, since PC monitors cost far more per inch than a good HDTV. However, you don't need the Tivo, or the DVD player, or the 6.1 decoder (though still the speakers). PC, $500. Pioneer A-06, $130. SB Audigy 2, $120. Decent tuner card (personal choice on these varies a lot, though Hauppage seems the most common brand of choice), $200. Total comes out to around $2100 - Already ahead of the home theater setup.

      The PC setup really excells in the "features" category. First of all, it can do everything the home theater setup does, which obviously counts as the basic level of functionality. It can also play any digital media format you can imagine (ie, anything a PC can play)... Some standalone DVD players now support DivX, but how about XVid? Or AVI? Or raw MPEG-2 streams? Or QT? Then we have content that actually runs as a form of program, such as Flash.

      Additinally, a HTPC does work as a general purpose PC. You won't want to read small text for several hours a day on even a high-quality TV, but to look something up on-line, or a quick email check, they do rather nicely. Enjoy classic console video games? Well, download an emulator for your favorite system (you can get them for anything before the current gen, up to and including PS1, N64, and GBA), and they look sweet, without needing to connect 27 dongles to your TV's coax-in, or ever blowing the dust out of a cartridge again.

      Finally, you can burn your stored media to DVD. A set-top box to do that, even if the PVR would let you, will set you back another grand. Network support? A $20 NIC (assuming your motherboard didn't include one) rather than a $500 "appliance".

      So the price comes out ahead (not even considering "advanced" features that most people familiar with PCs take for granted), and the feature set just destroys a standard home theater system. Considering this, we shouldn't ask "which costs less and does more", but rather, "Why the hell do home theater systems cost so much and do so little?". Even if you do plan to blow $5k to $15k on a kickass home theater setup, spend the cash on a better TV and sound system, not obscenely priced components, when a $1k PC will literally "do it all" for you.

      Also, anyone seriously wanting a home theater setup should budget a bit for environmental considerations as well - Spending $1000 on light-control and sound suppression will improve overall viewing enjoyment far more than. A reflected glare on the screen, or a noisy HVAC system that kicks on every half hour, makes more of a difference in quality than an extra 2 inches of screen or 4ch-vs-6.1 surround.

    6. Re:Well, why not? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      and it *can* cost less than a commercial model with the same features, especially if you equip a lot of features into the system.

      There's one feature it will always lack. The ability to fit into my TV cabinet.

      I have a feeling that the people who put computers in their living room are the same people who have TVs on milk crates and sit on folding chairs that they scavenged out of the dumpster.

    7. Re:Well, why not? by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah... You do know that you can buy plenty of cases that look very nice and fit in the same space as any other component, right?

      Here is the case mentioned in the article, for example.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  7. Why not? by mikehilly · · Score: 1

    I have always wanted to do build a HTPC, but have not had the time or money as of yet. I think it would be interesting to learn more about sound video and have fun doing it in my own home on one of my PC's. With the right TV/Projector you could do much more with it than just watch movies.

  8. Article Text! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Building a Basic HTPC
    February 03, 2004

    Summary: You've read about building no-budget Dual Opteron workstations, and RAID-less storage servers and even air filters at FiringSquad. Today we'll be looking at Building a Basic Home Theater PC. If you're thinking Small Form Factor ATX, you haven't learned anything from our previous articles. This HTPC is designed for two purposes only: high-definition upsampling of DVD video and personal video recording. If you ever wondered how DVD's can look better when brought to HDTV resolutions even though the source is the same, read inside.

    IntroductionPage:: ( 1 / 10 )

    The HTPC or "Home Theater PC" is a popular but often nebulous concept. Everyone would agree that a fundamental component is that the pc be connected to a television but what the HTPC is used for is something to debate. Some people use a HTPC to play games on the big screen, while others see it as a way to enjoy high-quality DVD, others see it as a music/video/image jukebox, and still others see it as a way to get a low-cost HDTV by using a desktop monitor rather than TV.

    The problem with having a HTPC doing multiple tasks is that it becomes more difficult to integrate the software and yet your wallet gets thinner and thinner. Instead of starting off with a full-fledged HTPC, we're going to start with a very introductory approach to the HTPC and then through follow-up articles, add more features.

    For this introductory HTPC article, we have two very specific tasks: DVD upsampled to HDTV resolutions, and a personal TV recorder. Since we're "lazy," our HTPC needs to perform like a real piece of home theater equipment as much as possible. The system should integrate itself seamlessly, and shouldn't force the user to think about it as a computer. The HTPC also has to have an advantage over a similar dedicated component ** there's no point in reinventing the wheel unless you can make it faster, smaller, and cheaper.

    Why these two tasks?

    We've designed this system as an ideal starting point for anyone with a "HDTV ready" television.

    Having a PC-based TIVO is ideal for a number of reasons. The most important factor is cost. Both TIVO and ReplayTV charge a subscription fee and ridiculous premiums for larger hard drives. With a PC, you can add and replace IDE hard drives on a whim and also enjoy free TV listings. In addition, it is possible to enjoy higher quality video through a PC-based system through improved video scaling than would otherwise be possible with a standard unit.

    Finally, ATI and other third-party software applications have media server applications that will allow their multimedia products to stream video to client systems on your desktop, and NVIDIA is expected to add this capability to its Personal Cinema line in the near future.

    The upsampled DVD is the more important feature in our HTPC today. Even if cost is no object, the HTPC approach to DVD can offer better picture quality than any stand-alone unit. DVDs are recorded with 480 lines of resolution, however it turns out that upsampling the video to a 720p or 1080i resolution for HDTV and HDTV-ready televisions will offer the best quality.

    It's a real phenomenon

    One of the most often confused concepts is the idea that upsampling DVDs to HDTV resolutions will make DVDs look as good as HDTV. It doesn't seem as if this is possible -- the data is not present to begin with. The real answer is that while an upsampled DVD isn't as good as true HDTV, it will look better than a straight 480 progressive lines of resolution. Here's why**

    HDTV-ready CRT

    Like a CRT PC monitor, an HDTV-ready CRT can sync at multiple resolutions. The catch is that the electron beam is not designed to change in size depending on the resolution (it changes but not by design). Suppose you have a 19" monitor running at 1280x1024 or 1600x1200. While reading this webpage, look at the white background. Get as close to the screen as you can to study the white. Now, change your monito

    1. Re:Article Text! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for posting it, I news site is blocked for ... Gaming??

    2. Re:Article Text! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I HAVE SEEN THE FNORDS!

  9. Why? by scosol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Porn.

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
    1. Re:Why? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      When I was in an apartment I had a setup much like this. The only major difference was I had an A/V transmitter sending the video from the computer to the TV over the air. Granted, I had to tweak the wireless network so it wouldn't interfere with the signal and everytime someone juiced up the microwave, I got some interference. In general it was kind of fun setting up. I used a RF remote and an IR transmitter to a wireless keyboard.

      -

    2. Re:Why? by K8Fan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Porn.

      It's rated "funny" but it's actually true. There are porn companies now offering 720P, high-definition porn in Windows Media format. The only way to watch this stuff is via a HTPC.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  10. DVD upsampled? by Brahmastra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the point? 480P is converted to either 540P or 1080i in most HDTVs anyway.

    1. Re:DVD upsampled? by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      in the article, he argues that using a pc vid card provides superior upsampling. i don't know about that, but the other points regarding flexibility and bang-for-buck are pretty self-evident.

    2. Re:DVD upsampled? by jskiff · · Score: 1

      I think the point is not just for TVs, but for projectors. As projector and screen prices keep coming down, people are looking for ways to make the image look even better.

      You can get a good Infocus X1 projector and a decent Stewart screen for right around $2,000 USD. This is around the same price as most large rear-projection HDTVs, and much much less than any plasma, LCD, or LCOS TV.

      Plus, if you're willing to support the evil empire, you can get discs like Terminator 2. It has a version of the film in Windows Media format that's actually in high def.

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    3. Re:DVD upsampled? by BRock97 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no. Most HDTVs and HD monitors support native 480p, and if that is all that is being sent by the device playing the DVD, that is all that will be displayed. Now, Best Buy is selling players that upconvert DVD content to 720p and 1080i, but those are quite a bit more than a standard deck. That is what makes the HTPC so enticing.....

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    4. Re:DVD upsampled? by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      What's the point? 480P is converted to either 540P or 1080i in most HDTVs anyway.

      Good question. In my case, it's because neither of those resolutions are a perfect match for my display. I have a Sony 8" CRT projector, and the optimum resolution for it (i.e. the point at which the gap between scan lines disappears, but does not overlap) is 600 lines. So I run at a resolution of 1066 x 600. I use a Radeon card, and I believe the scaler in that is better than the Genesis scaling chips in commercial stand-alone DVD players.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    5. Re:DVD upsampled? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of sets still accept and only display 480p directly witout scaling. I think most CRT HDTVs multiscan 480p and 1080i. Some plasmas are simply EDTV: 480i.

      For scaling, unless the set has a Faroudja FLI2300 chip, a newer Radeon will likely be at least as good.

      Few TVs have acceptable deinterlacing, but on video based material it is better than even WinDVD. Granted, most software DVD players suck - they are "bob" or "weave". but when patched into software like dScaler and ffdshow, they are better than most deinterlacing chips, and sometimes meet Faroudja's DCDi.

      I have a Holo3DGraph PCI card and the quality from even analog sources output to an older LCD projector looks phenominal, in part because the projector has a poorer scaler than the HTPC does.

    6. Re:DVD upsampled? by echo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have an Infocus X1, and it has a the DCDi chip from Farouja in it. It upsamples 480p to 800x600 automatically, but.. here's the funny thing. 480i looks BETTER on this projector, because the Farouja chip does a better job of deinterlacing and inverse 3:2 pulldown than the "Progressive Scan" DVD player I have. So I don't even use 480p, I use 480i over component for DVDs and Composite from my DirecTV dish (the DTV signal is only 480x480 resolution mpeg-2 and look actually WORSE coming out the S-video jack, it emphasises the MPEG-2 compression and makes everything blocky on the projector.. Composite smooths those out because it's blurry)

      So the answer to the big question here is.. if you have a GOOD projector or monitor with a GOOD deinterlacer/scaler chipset, then you don't need a HTPC. If you don't, then a HTPC can get you good deinterlacing/scaling for your DVDs.

      BTW.

      http://deinterlace.sf.net for a Windows Deinterlacer

      or

      http://tvtime.sf.net for a Linux Deinterlacer.

    7. Re:DVD upsampled? by raygundan · · Score: 1

      It depends a bit on your situation and how anal you are. If you have only analog component inputs, you want as many steps done in the digital domain as you can. If you have DVI, this is not such a big deal.

      Additionally, you can do scaling better with an HTPC than you can with most sets built-in scalers. It's simply easier to get quality results when you're scaling right from the digital source, and you have the flexibility of complex, customizeable filters and scaling algortithms.

      It's the sort of thing that only the truly bored or quality-obsessed really care about. But if, like me, you found buying an HD tuner card to be your cheapest solution to get HDTV to your set-- you discover there's all these little fringe benefits *even though you went the cheap route*.

  11. Why? by grub · · Score: 1


    Hmm.. for my "home theatre PC" I run video through coax to my TV, run digital audio through coax to my Dolby Digital receiver, and use an "ATI Remote Bob" RF remote control (made by Saphire).

    Any video is full screen and in excellent quality, the remote control (being RF) means it's not line-of-sight. In fact my computer room is ~5 M away behind me. The coax runs over the ceiling tiles in my basement. If I tossed you the remote control you'd likely think it was a DVD player until I you asked about the "ATI" logo on the remote.

    Damn cool.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  12. For me by Judg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do it for the challenges.
    Things like:
    "Build a HTPC into a VCR, and keep the original funcionality of the VCR"
    "Build a HTPC in my receiver, and make sure everything works" (Side note: That one was only sort of successful - had to remove the amp and use an external one, to much EMI)
    I do it because I like having choices, I do it because I like to be able to stream show X to TV Y or burn it to DVD.

    I do it because I'm a geek and a tinkerer, and it's in my nature.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:For me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad consumer, bad!

      You must purchase things, not create, think about or build them.

      Hobbies are not part of the New Way, unless of course your hobby is buying preassembled things.

      ---
      The Dark Overlord

    2. Re:For me by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Build a HTPC into a VCR, and keep the original funcionality of the VCR"

      Any chance of seeing pictures, parts list, et cetera? Where did you find a VCR with that much extra space inside? When you say "keep the original functionality", you do mean retaining the original helical scan head and tape transport, don't you? I'm not attacking you or doubting you, I'm sincerely interested in seeing what you've done.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:For me by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      It was a nasty hack - more or less proof of concept for me since it ended up looking ugly.

      What I did was bought an old 1980's VCR from Goodwill and gutted it, then put in the parts of a more modern VCR which left room for a mini-itx board.
      The reason I say it was ugly was because it was a horrible scratched silver plastic/woodgrain thing that didn't even come close to matching my current AV equipment look plus the fact I wasn't as skilled with the dremel, files, etc then to transplant the face properly. It worked, but it didn't look good - seemed real out of place.

      We've got a newer VCR and it looks like it just might fit a mini-itx board, but I'm not sure.

      I do know that my Panasonic single-load DVD player from 2000 is mostly empty, so I'm probably going to put something into that.

      As it is I don't have pics, since it was ~4 years ago (right after I got the DVD player hehe) and didn't own a digital cam at the time. If I ever do it again though I'll be sure to document the whole thing - but make it prettier this time hehe

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  13. What I want to do is use my monitor... by corebreech · · Score: 1

    ...to watch HDTV content, but I can't seem to find the right combination of gadgets to make it work.

    For instance, I'd want/need to get my HD content from DirecTV/DishNetwork. Ideally I'd want the MPEG stream to be saved directly to my HD, but that doesn't seem possible. I'd settle for using the new/upcoming Dish/TiVO HD-PVR's these DBS companies are offering but even then there appears to be a problem getting the content into the computer... my video card (and all of the other video cards I've looked at) sports different ways of outputting signal but only two ways in inputting it, S-Video and component, and neither seem suitable for displaying HD content.

    Am I missing something? I'm not a hardware whiz (can you tell?) so any help would be appreciated.

    1. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      Use a DVB tuner card... ala Nexus-s or the Twinhan cards... I currently have Dishnetwork PVR functionality on my PC thanks to those cards... The cards work for any DVB standard transmission including Bell Express-vu, DishNetwork, and almost all the FTA satellites in North America. DTV uses some crazy assed scheme call DSS, which is incompatable...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    2. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by corebreech · · Score: 1

      I don't understand... don't you need some kind of device from DishNetwork to decode their programming, or are we talking about pirating the signal? Or is it like C-BAND (big dish), where some channels are in-the-clear while others are encrypted?

      Let's say I want to get pay channels on DishNetwork, would what you're describing allow me to do that?

    3. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the way it works is, when you buy a set-top box, it's a pretty standard piece of kit. When you buys one, you calls up your satellite provider, having plugged it in, read them off the serial number, and the number of your LNB unit, and they authorize it in their system.

      Well, get a card, plug it into your pc, call them up, give them the serial number, and you're off to the races.

      I think. Not sure.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Oh, and do you know if the Nexus-S is compatible with Star Choice?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1
      yeah, who can live without Free-to-Air channels like MTV-China and Jesus Satellite TV I&II?

      the free satellite channels you can pick up are pretty crappy.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    6. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "S-video and composite".

      Composite is the single RCA plug video cable, and like you say, isn't suitable for HD content.

      Component on the other hand, is three cables (Y/Pr/Pb) and is definitely suitable for HD content.

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    7. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by Pheersum · · Score: 1

      Component is suitable for HD content. It's even one of the suggestions in the article. You are correct about S-Video, however -- it can't even handle 480p. Same for composite, of course.

      By the way, if you want to do a component video connection on the cheap, you can use 3 composite video (the typically-yellow RCA) to make a component connection. Beats that Monster crap in price by a long shot, since most people have the necessary 3 RCA cables lying around.

      Note that you cannot use the sound ones, as they are a different resistance than the video ones... however, the video cables CAN double as digital coax for Dolby Digital/et. al if you need to connect something to your amp.

    8. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      No, Star Choice uses encryption that is not an open standard, so thus it cannot be used (unless someone has software for it.)

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    9. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      Good god no! :P

      Sorry, but that was as misinformed as it can get... The satellite provider will never activate an account if you use one of these PCI sat cards. What you can do is if you already have an account with these guys, then you can take your CAM (smartcard from your receiver), plug it into a CAM reader attached to your PC (or DVB card if you buy the more expensive version), then the software will decode the signal using your CAM as authorization.

      The sat compaines (Bell and Dish) do not support this at all. This is strictly a do it at your own risk kind of deal.

      If you want to do this without buying the sat providers hardware, you can't activate a CAM, thus the only option would be to pirate the signal (which these devices can be used to do with the correct software).

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    10. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Poot. But Bell ExpressVu works with the hauppage kit? If so, that's enough for me to switch....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. Interesting. As you've probably gathered from my other post, I'm on StarChoice, and there's no smartcards involved.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  14. Oh goody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hurray!

    Just another way for us fat bastards to find a way to sit infront of the computer!

    Hurray!

  15. No service fees? More features? by BagOBones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of the DVR units out there come as part of a Satellite system or come with a subscription fee.

    You can make your own system with an on-screen guide, time shifting and the ability to play DIVX movies and games for rather cheap now.
    The retail units still don't play DIVX or Apple .MOV files well and are vary limited.

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:No service fees? More features? by GrubInCan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And no snooping.

      I caught the end of a segment on a news show explaining the stats on how many Tivo (I think) users had paused/replayed a certain item during the superbowl, including how many times they had replayed it.

      I didn't realize the PVR sent this sort of infomation back to the mother ship.

    2. Re:No service fees? More features? by Janax · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure either, but here's a link that talks about the same thing.

    3. Re:No service fees? More features? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You can turn that off so TiVo won't send anything home.

  16. I've been waiting a long time for this... by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...and other "Why?" questions. For instance:

    wHY install Linux on an x-Box?

    WHY install Linux on a toaster?

    WHY make a cell phone so small that only an ant can use it?

    "Why" is such a great question, but unfortunately the only answer here seems to be "Because I can". Didn't science have a purpose once upon a time?

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    1. Re:I've been waiting a long time for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Isaac Newton thought through the commercial implications of his work before discovering gravity.

      Don't be silly, science never had a purpose.

    2. Re:I've been waiting a long time for this... by log0n · · Score: 1

      WHY not?

      That's enough purpose for most of us here..

  17. Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by genixia · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Play DVDs. More advanced features than standalone players, such as bookmarking (that allows you to skip that pesky 'forced' content), multiregion playback etc.
    2) Play games on a big TV with decent 5.1 sound.
    3) Play MP3s from a central server through your stereo.
    4) Used by people with high end projectors to deinterlace video signals.
    5) Confirm your geekiness.

    1. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Download with BitTorrent and play non-DVD/DiVX without converting to DVD/VCD/SVCD

    2. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by sporty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. - you probably mean features more advanced than bookmarking. It really depends on what firmware is on your dvd player. Mine gives the option to set 5 bookmarks until i eject the dvd. Not the most ideal, but it works.

      3. - 1 stero cable from your computer to your stero system solves this w/o building a seperate dedicated machine. heck, it's the same thing w/ the difference of which machine does the work.

      5. - i post on slashdot already :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by HardCase · · Score: 1
      1) Play DVDs. More advanced features than standalone players, such as bookmarking (that allows you to skip that pesky 'forced' content), multiregion playback etc.


      But lower video and audio quality than a dedicated solution, assuming that you're spending the same amount of money on your DVD system as you are on your HTPC. And that's even with S-Video.


      2) Play games on a big TV with decent 5.1 sound.


      True, but only on an HDTV screen. I'm not sure that I want to sit through a session of Half Life on a TV set. The 5.1 sound would be nice, though.


      3) Play MP3s from a central server through your stereo.


      That seems valid to me, although there are certainly cheaper ways to do it.


      4) Used by people with high end projectors to deinterlace video signals.


      Not. People with high end projectors use something like one of the deinterlacers from Faroudja. The video output from a PC doesn't begin to approach the limits of a high-end projector system.


      5) Confirm your geekiness.


      No argument there.


      -h-

    4. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1
      1. - you probably mean features more advanced than bookmarking. It really depends on what firmware is on your dvd player. Mine gives the option to set 5 bookmarks until i eject the dvd. Not the most ideal, but it works.

      The DVD player software I use on my machine at home remembers where I was in the dvd and if I eject it, come back a week later, and stick it back in the drive and start up PowerDVD, it continues where it left off. And it keeps it remembered even if the power goes out.

    5. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by costas · · Score: 1

      Sorry, everyone keeps forgetting the true #1: TiVo only works in the USA.

    6. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by genixia · · Score: 1
      Not. People with high end projectors use something like one of the deinterlacers from Faroudja. The video output from a PC doesn't begin to approach the limits of a high-end projector system.

      You've obviously never heard of www.avsforum.com.
    7. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Indeed I have. It's the "Stereo Review" of the online video community.

    8. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      6) Because TIVO isn't avalable for sale in my country.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  18. No Reason For It by derrickh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got the idea into my head a while back that my PC would do everything. I'd have every piece of electronic and entertainment equipment in one box. I would be able to watch DVDs, TV, play CDs and MP3s, fake Tivo, Fax machine, answering machine all from my PC. All controlled via remote and piped to my TV.

    It would be incredible.

    Then I realized that I already had all of that stuff and it all worked perfectly. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

    D

    1. Re:No Reason For It by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then I realized that I already had all of that stuff and it all worked perfectly.

      And if you didn't already have all that stuff?

      Or if you wanted to tidy up your A/V rack? I count maybe six individual boxes that could be integrated into one box.

      For one thing, it ignores deinterlacing needed for HDTV. The minimum cost for a good standalone deinterlacer is about $900, a standalone deinterlacer + scaler: $2500. With a non-Booktree based TV card ($50) into an existing machine and running dScaler, you get most of that quality and a scaler.

    2. Re:No Reason For It by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      For one thing, it ignores deinterlacing needed for HDTV

      Which isn't needed by the vast majority of people. The only people who need deinterlacing/scaling are people with older front projection systems that don't have an integrated scaler. All current HD sets have one, and usually a good one from Faroudja or Sage at that.

      Given, if you don't have one you can save some serious bucks by using dScalar. It's a great piece of software -- I remember it being compared favorably to the $30k scalers back when it was first released in beta form.

      The perpetual issue with a HTPC is that while, yes, you can migrate a bunch of stuff into a single box, you trade off usability. And given how unusable most home theater setups are already, that's saying something. You also have to spend a good bit of time tinkering with it, nearly perpetually, and that's something a lot of people (geeks included) just don't want to deal with. Sometimes I enjoy tinkering, but a lot of the time I just want it to work because I'd prefer to spend time tinkering else (or just freaking relax!). Most importantly, when my wife wants to use it I damn well want it to work.

    3. Re:No Reason For It by wramsdel · · Score: 1

      Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

      You're not from around here, are you?

    4. Re:No Reason For It by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Tidy up the rack?? But I enjoy all the LEDs on my:

      [ vinyl turntable ] [ laptop ]
      [ vcr ] [ digital tv tuner ]
      [ dvd ]
      [ radio tuner ]
      [ digital radio tuner ]
      [ amp ]

      If only i had the time to dig out all those old SNES / Ataris / Segas etc... to add into the mix I'd be a happier bunny.

      Thats why USB is so cool - you get to SEE all those new toys!!

    5. Re:No Reason For It by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      The perpetual issue with a HTPC is that while, yes, you can migrate a bunch of stuff into a single box, you trade off usability.

      Nope. Mine is controlled with an AMX touchpanel tossing info via RS232 to the PC, which is decoded with uICE and send to the appropriate application.

      In other words, you just tap "DVD" on the touchpanel, hit "Play", and the DVD app loads and starts playing. uICE can be trained to work with any remote control, so you could even use your existing DVD player's remote to fully operate the software DVD player.

      Same goes for any other app on the PC. If you can control it with a keyboard, you can control it with any handheld remote and uICE.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  19. Porn by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    Can any other popular home theater system plug online on allow you to browse the hun?

    HTPC is the way to go!

    ignore me

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  20. I can say the same thing about just about anything by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why build your own PC?

    Why build your own car?

    Why build your own house?

    Why do any of the above when you can just purchase the finished product outright which might be better than what you could build? Because we can.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  21. How ironic... by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1
    A co-worker just asked me yesterday about setting a home theater PC up..

    LOL. Saves me the trouble of finding information on it.

  22. Noise reduction - does this make any sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From the graphics section:

    Compared to the native tuner on my HDTV-ready 27" Samsung 2796 TV (which was last years top of the line 27" Samsung HDTV), the ATI shows a reduction in signal noise in all channels. The drawback to this effect is that it makes the picture look a little soft, this is similar to the pictures from the early progressive scan TVs. It can be argued about which picture is preferable, the slightly noisier but sharper or the noiseless, softer picture.

    Can noise reduction make an image softer? If removing it makes the images softer, can it be called noise?

    1. Re:Noise reduction - does this make any sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes

      Say you have some high freq hiss on a cassette. You can use an equalizer to turn down the highest freq band a bit and now the hiss is a lot less objectionable

      of course, now the cymbals just dont have that same crisp sound - you've lost some signal along with the noise you've filtered out.

      if the noise was in a totally separate band from the signal you want, it'd be trivial to filter out and there'd be no issue.

    2. Re:Noise reduction - does this make any sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Remember Dolby A? It appeared to just remove the high hat from your music. That's "softening" - removing high frequencies. The approach throws the baby out with the bathwater, though - there is certainly a lot of noise there, but it's not all noise. Blurring noise away is a suck solution.

  23. Keeping ahead of the curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A HTPC is a great way to get ahead of the Copyright Gestapo.

    Check this out: http://www.gujistyle.com/HTPC.html

    For the whole set-up to work with minimum hassle, get a LCD (LCoS or flat-panel LCD) or plasma display or a multi-sync CRT monitor (Princeton Graphics, Monivision, Proton, CTX).

    I predict that within a few years, the Copyright Gestapo will force TiVo into bankruptcy. Don't forget the broadcast flags that will be present in the TV signals. Such broadcast flags may prevent compliant consumer electronics from recording your favorite show. I doubt this would affect HTPCs since it is the software on the HTPC that does most of the work and software can be created to bypass copyright protection.

  24. Cost effective? by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Having a PC-based TIVO is ideal for a number of reasons.

    Posters here seem to have demonstrated pretty clearly that even that's not close to cost-effective, unless you have almost all parts already and don't care about much of Tivo's functionality.

    You do this stuff for fun, not to save money.

    1. Re:Cost effective? by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      and don't care about much of Tivo's functionality

      What does Tivo do that, say Mythtv doesn't? And don't say Season's Pass. That's trivial to implement once you have a database of guide data, and has been done by every PVR software package that I've seen.

      You're right about cost, though.

    2. Re:Cost effective? by gatekeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may cost a bit more, but I haven't yet seen a tivo that'll support more than two tuners (and that's only for DTV), scale to HD resolutions, allow for archiving to CD/DVD, Play DVDs, allow me to surf the web, read email, etc.

      An HTPC does a LOT more than a TiVo for only a LITTLE more in cost.

    3. Re:Cost effective? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Why not say season passes?

      Justify 'been done by every PVR software package I've seen' - You claim to have seen MythTV...? That doesn't even claim to support them - repeated recordings are *not* season passes.

      The only package that actually claims season passess is showshifter, and that's expensive, presumably because they had to license the patents to do it.

      Then there's wishlists - *nothing* does that because they can't get the guide data for it. Oh, and suggestions...

    4. Re:Cost effective? by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      repeated recordings are *not* season passes.

      I know that. I'm not talking about repeated recordings in the sense of "every day at 9:00pm," I'm talking about recording any episode of a program at any time on any channel, with duplicates on or off (your choice), which a quick google search says is pretty much what Tivo does, plus some nice filtering. Showshifter seems to have licensed the use of the marketing term.

      You're right about wishlists. Suggestions are being worked on.

    5. Re:Cost effective? by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      The only package that actually claims season passess is showshifter

      You sure about that? Googling doesn't seem verify this, though Showshifter does have very similar functionality.

    6. Re:Cost effective? by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An HTPC does a LOT more than a TiVo for only a LITTLE more in cost.

      That is, if you value your free time at $0.

      Yes, I can build a HTPC that does everything you said, and more, for only a bit more than a TiVo, but will it be as reliable? Will it be as user friendly (and not just to me! If my wife can't use it then it's worthless. If my visiting relatives/friends can't use it then it decreases in value somewhat)? How much time will I have to spend tweaking it? All just so that I can have it do everything?

      For some people this isn't an issue, because that's what they want to spend their free time on. Odds are they don't also do their own housework (both cleaning and repairing/improving), vehicle maintainence, etc. -- everyone picks and chooses what to spend their time and money on. This is no different.

      And can you even get HD satellite tuners for your PC? Seriously.

    7. Re:Cost effective? by gatekeep · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take as long as you'd think. Lots of the common HTPC apps will take care of a LOT of the details. SageTV is one such app. Media jukebox, multi-tuner PVR w/ free guide data, DVD software, client streaming, all in one. It takes less time to setup than a TiVo if you factor in the waiting for the initial guide data to download. I spend very little time tinkering with my system, but you're right that I am the sort of person who doesn't mind playing a bit.

      As for HD, you can't get HD satellite tuners, or cable tuners, but you can get OTA HD. I really don't have any desire in getting HD if I can't timeshift it anyhow, so I find this adequate for now. Hopefully the situation will change sooner or later.

  25. HDTV Recorder by Glendale2x · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All the other functions of a HTPC aside, the PowerMac G3 I'm using does one thing I can't replicate with a one-box solution: it records HDTV over FireWire. A DVHS deck would cost me way more than the $100 + $75 FireWire/USB card I paid for the G3. Even then, the DVHS deck uses tape opposed to random access hard drive.

    It's not exactly a TiVo, but it time-shifts HDTV just fine. Since there is so little HD content anyway, I have no need for an HD TiVo anyway.

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:HDTV Recorder by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, can it capture HDTV (or even play it back) at the original resolution? Seems like that would be almost impossible for an old G3, especially over FireWire.

    2. Re:HDTV Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      HDTV (or really ATSC) is only about 20Mbits/sec which is a relatively low data-rate, easily handled by firewire (400Mbits/sec) and older computers.

      The hard part is the mpeg decoding, which, I assume in this guy's case, is handled by a dedicated decoder chip on the firewire device.

    3. Re:HDTV Recorder by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      The hard part is the mpeg decoding, which, I assume in this guy's case, is handled by a dedicated decoder chip on the firewire device.

      Correct; I'm just using the G3 to store the stream. The tuner does all the hard work. My notes on the setup are here.

      --
      this is my sig
  26. Things I do with my HTPC by nate1138 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are TONS of reasons to build one if so inclined. Here's what I do with mine:

    • Video capture from my DishPVR for conversion to DVD
    • DVD-Audio playback (Audigy2 supports all DVD-A formats, and has a 106DB s/n ration to boot)
    • Games rock on a 52" HD monitor
    • Terrestrial HDTV tuner
    • Upsampling DVD
    • MP3 jukebox
    • Divx/QT/Mpeg/whatever playback that my standalone player won't handle

    I'm sure given more time I could think of a few more, but that covers the majors. It wasn't any cheaper than a standalone unit for some of these functions, and it isn't quite as easy to deal with, but it was fun to build and tweak on. Plus it has the added benefit of being upgradeable.

    One thing that this article doesn't seem to touch on is noise. When I first built mine the noise was intolerable. I ended up having to replace the PS, CPU fan and case fans with quiet models, and lining the case with Dynamat to cut the noise down to where it didn't bother me.
    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    1. Re:Things I do with my HTPC by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      I agree. Noise is a HUGE factor when building an HTPC. I tried using a Shuttle SFF PC which is quieter than the average PC, but I could hear the hum of the fan in an otherwise silent room.

      One could argue that you could just turn the darn thing off when you're not using it, but who wants to wait for the OS to boot up, etc. every time they use the HTPC?

      I could have tried a bunch of different things to build a silent HTPC, but the cost/benefit ratio didn't seem to provide any benefits. Since my primary goal for the HTPC was as a PVR, it would have been cheaper to just get a PVR from my cable company (and more convenient, since most PC TV tuners don't decode proprietary digital cable/satellite signals anyways).

      Finally, finding a good front-end with a 10-foot user interface was another challenge. While there are some pretty good ones out there, I had stability problems with some of them, or found some of the functionality lacking on others.

    2. Re:Things I do with my HTPC by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Eh, I tried to get a nice tv-friendly UI, but failed as well. My HD set can do 800x600, so I just run XP on it (DVD-Audio doesn't work under Linux, neither does my HDTV tuner). With a wireless keyboard/pointer combo it's pretty usable.

      As for the noise, it was pretty expensive, but by the time I was working on noise issues I had passed the point of no return and just had to get it right ;-)

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    3. Re:Things I do with my HTPC by RexxFiend · · Score: 1

      I mentioned this last time we all had this discussion but nobody picked up on it. I picked up an old ATI 8500 all in wonder cheap cos it was end of line - its a decent card and can just about manage deux ex 2 :-) but it has the killer app for this sort of thing - a RF remote.
      PC in the spare room, svid and audio cables running under the floor to the stereo/TV, and you can sit in the lounge and control the PC with the remote, sweet! No fan noise and all the music/TV shows/downloaded films and TV shows you can watch.
      Also check out myhtpc for windows for a highly customisable, TV friendly front end.

      --

      A crash reduces
      Your expensive computer
      to a simple stone.
  27. Why can't it behave like a computer? by j-turkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The system should integrate itself seamlessly, and shouldn't force the user to think about it as a computer

    Why? Obviously, if one has the know-how to build such a system, they probably won't find it inconvenient to use it like a computer. I know that I'm like the fact that me "HTPC" doesn't act like a component -- and I appreciate the flexibility that a computer offers me. Anybody who needs their "HTPC" to act like a component is probably better off saving time and money by just buying a component in the first place.

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by miltimj · · Score: 1

      Most people don't want a keyboard and mouse sitting in their living room, nor the awkward use that would come from it.

      Saying "that's why I have a remote" doesn't work either -- you get no more functionality from an HTPC remote than a component remote.

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    2. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by j-turkey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Most people don't want a keyboard and mouse sitting in their living room, nor the awkward use that would come from it.

      Saying "that's why I have a remote" doesn't work either -- you get no more functionality from an HTPC remote than a component remote.

      I understand your point, as was the jist of the article...but this is Slashdot. I'm sure that there are a significant amount of Slashdot readers who feel that it's perfectly natural to use a keyboard and mouse in their living room.

      Secondly, I have a wireless remote for my computer from ATI, and it *does* provide more functionality than a component remote. It works as a wireless mouse, and has multiple buttons that will act as macros to do whatever I want (as well as each button behaving differently for different applications). I'm psyched to get my updated version in the mail -- it should offer even greater functionality.

      While this solution (and ones like it) are clearly not for everyone, most geeks don't have a problem with it. Most people who are willing to put together a system like this probably feel the same way I do. I find it more flexible than the alternative (a component system).

      --

      -Turkey

    3. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm sure that there are a significant amount of Slashdot readers who feel that it's perfectly natural to use a keyboard and mouse in their living room.

      Just because I read Slashdot and am a professional geek doesn't mean I don't have a lovely wife who'd make me sleep in the car if I brought a keyboard into the living room.

    4. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Righto - If I build one, I'm going to try to include abilities to do other PC tasks when no one is using it for media playback. There's always some task that is too CVU intensive to play well with some others, no matter how fast the CPU. The media box can be ripping MP3s from my CDs, serving as a temporatry file repository for other boxen on the LAN, or running SETI at home/Protein Folding/pretending it's a glorified Lava Light.
      There are plenty of geeks who hack software only, but people who hack hardware and are reluctant to do a little sofware tweaking is a category very close to, if not identical to, the null set.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      1. Wireless keyboard and mouse, put them in a drawer when you're just using the box for media functions.

      2. put the box on a LAN, run its PC-like functions from a more "normal" PC in another room.

      3. Remember the people who hide all their media components in a genuine early American style colonial maple media center just like Thomas Jefferson hid his TV in. If haing a keyboard in the living room seems tacky, think of all the people who find a TV or a VCR equally tacky.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    6. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      Just because I read Slashdot and am a professional geek doesn't mean

      Which part of "significant amount" did you take to mean "all" or "you"?

      --

      -Turkey

  28. We are geeks! by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What do you mean?
    The HTPC also has to have an advantage over a similar dedicated component ? there's no point in reinventing the wheel unless you can make it faster, smaller, and cheaper.
    The strongest point is that people just like to do it themselves. Whether it's a hobby, an instructional session, or just utilization of existing hardware, rolling your own HTPC is just what geeks do.

    Perhaps they didn't mean for this to be spotlighted on /.?
    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  29. For most of the world, there isn't a point by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems your average user doesn't care about any of this integrated pc stuff.

    They want their tivo, their dvd player, their vcr, etc.

    But the biggest problem, imo, (which some will say these pcs address cause of upgradeability) is that once you buy a combo setup system--tivo/dvd player/vcr/whathaveyou, you're "locked in" to that system for a while....people (such as myself) don't want to spend a gang of money constantly upgrading, or sitting there wondering how quickly the entertainment center will become obsolete.

    Once the tech gets figured out, I think integrated all in one systems will take off....anyway, my $.00000000000019

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  30. wrong... by skedastik · · Score: 1

    Building a HTPC only makes sense if it can do something better than any other commercially available solution... It doesn't have to do something better... odds are you have misc parts lying around and could build one from those. As with mine, I spent $35 on parts... the rest I had already from old systems. It does everything I want it to, plus it is hundreds of dollars less than something commercially available. It's definitely not better, but far more practical than purchasing a commericial system.

  31. Foreign Videos by Chibi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This will only to appeal to a small segment of the population, but I speak from experience with anime (this could apply to any foreign works, though). There are times DVDs are released without subtitles in a language you can read or dialogue in a language you can understand. There are people out there (fans) who will go through the trouble of created timed subtitle scripts. So, if you have a PC and a region-compatible or region-free DVD player, you can enjoy this new video (which you payed for) with working subtitles!

    This becomes more interesting when you learn that a lot of entertainment goes through a localization process when they are being brought over to foreign markets. One prime example is how virtually every Hong Kong movie must have gangster rap in it... >_< So, sometimes people want to watch the original version.

    That's one advantage I can think of for HTPC.

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  32. Uhh.. Because you can? by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was little more then 50 years ago that people could easily build their own cars.

    There's also a very strong community of personal aircraft builders. (I know one, it impresses the hell out of me that he's building this thing and intends to fly it.)

    I enjoy building my own PCs because I can pick and choose to my taste.

    Where do people think innovation comes from? Big corporations paying for new designs? The majority comes from people PLAYING with ideas and creating new things!

    1. Re:Uhh.. Because you can? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      ALthough the homebuilt organization rocks (they'd probably want to be known as experimental aircraft organization, though). It's existance likely has more to do with lawsuits that drove the GA industry out of this country in the 70s. Now that aircraft makers have more immunity to crazy class action suits there is a ton of innovation going into new designs. Check out Adam aircraft's new twin push pull design, not exactkt cheap but it sure looks like a nice plane.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Uhh.. Because you can? by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where do people think innovation comes from? Big corporations paying for new designs?

      Yup. Exactly how much design comes from a tinkerer in his/her garage? Nearly all but a small fraction of a percent of innovation and design comes from large corporations.

      Prove me wrong.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:Uhh.. Because you can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fair bit of innovation comes out of large universities. But your essential point is still valid.

    4. Re:Uhh.. Because you can? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1
      design comes from large corporations

      A corporation does nothing. The individuals that work there are the ones who innovate. The true innovators are the ones who would be doing great things even if they didn't have to work; i.e. if they had the financial resources to innovate on their own. Nearly everyone in the country is forced to work for a corporation (if they want things like food), and nearly all corporations require their employees to sign over any IP developed while working there, so the fact that most innovation comes from corporations is a mere technicality and does not infer that the corporate structure fosters innovation or that there would be less innovation if people were financially able to do research independantly.

      p.s.
      Thanks for the troll bait. It was yummy! :D

  33. Tell me about it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I decided one day to build a machine that could do laundry, make be breakfast, clean the house, and give me a blow job... then I realized I already had a wife!

  34. Answer: by palad1 · · Score: 1

    None, else we would not do it.

    Okay, next question, let's see what's on ask slashdot

  35. ATI Blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats with selecting an ATI card for the graphics system. From what I've heard ATI capture support in linux is very minimal and closed. There are far better and more supported captured cards on the market that they could have chosen. Smells like sponsorship to me. :)

    1. Re:ATI Blows by ZipR · · Score: 1

      With my ATI Remote Wonder, I can turn stuff on and off through walls. My std tv/dvd/stereo remotes can't do that!

  36. Should be a computer, not a component by glinden · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • HTPC should integrate act like a component not a computer.
    I don't understand this. You have a fully functional computer. Why not use it like one?

    The attraction of a HTPC for me is that it can do a reasonably good job playing DVDs and recording TV (replacing a dedicated DVD player and TiVo) and also function as a full computer, allowing me to browse the web, read e-mail, work, and play games. In particular, playing PC games on a huge 80" projection screen with a surround sound system is pretty sweet.
    1. Re:Should be a computer, not a component by miltimj · · Score: 1

      Two words: Lifetime Subscription

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  37. MOD UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is this modded redundant?
    the other has been clipped

  38. Not a very insightful article by GreenCrackBaby · · Score: 5, Informative
    The problem with having a HTPC doing multiple tasks is that it becomes more difficult to integrate the software and yet your wallet gets thinner and thinner.


    Last year I found myself with an old AMD 800mhz PC, missing just the monitor (total value probably $100). I also have lots of divx movies. Converting the movies to MPEG, splitting them, and burning them to CDs so that I could watch them in my DVD player was a pain. Watching them on a computer was even worse. So, I hooked up my PC to the TV, put the PC on my wireless network, and now I have a "HTPC". Total cost to me -- $40 for a wireless network card.

    Now I'm in the process of installing MythTV on that PC (total cost $200 for a encoder/decoder card), and I'll have an awesome PVR without having to pay any monthly fees.

    There's no reason that your wallet needs to get thinner and thinner. If you are interested in a PVR (ie. Tivo), then you actually save piles of money by not having to pay the monthly Tivo fee.
    --

    "The market alone cannot provide sufficient constraints on corporation's penchant to cause harm." -- Joel Bakan
    1. Re:Not a very insightful article by elmegil · · Score: 1
      Converting the movies to MPEG, splitting them, and burning them to CDs so that I could watch them in my DVD player was a pain.

      It's called "scripting". A pain only once.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Not a very insightful article by rjelks · · Score: 1

      He said DivX, so I think the pain would be waiting for all of those to convert to mpeg2 for video CD's. Not a big deal for 4-5 movies, but you'd be suprised at how many DivX movies some people have collected.

      -

    3. Re:Not a very insightful article by borgasm · · Score: 1

      To add to your statement...

      Linux is only free if your time is worth $0/hour.

      Personally, I would much rather spend more time building something myself than going out and buying it prepackaged. You have a sense of accomplishment when you finish the job.

    4. Re:Not a very insightful article by elmegil · · Score: 1

      If you knew how many DAPCentral episodes of various TV Shoes I've burned to VCD's you wouldn't say that.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:Not a very insightful article by rjelks · · Score: 1

      LoL, sorry man. I have a few backed-up movies too. I've been looking into larger hard drives so I can view them "video on demand" style.

    6. Re:Not a very insightful article by GrigorPDX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      not having to pay the monthly Tivo fee

      This is an important point. While the out-of-pocket costs may or may not be less, the freedom from monthly fees is a significant incentive.

      I despise recurring fees. When given the choice between a lower-cost porduct with a recurring charge or a higher-cost one-time purchase, I will invariably choose the latter alternative. Why rent when you can own? Even if the cost to build it yourself is significantly more than the cost of a similarly-featured commercial solution, how many months of subscription fees will you have to pay before the actual cost swings the other way?

    7. Re:Not a very insightful article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivo for Direct TV is 5 bucks a month. My lazy bum pays that readily and enjoys everyminute of it. But if you feel like its a rip off-- more power to you to make your own I suppose

    8. Re:Not a very insightful article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the base costs are roughly equal between your system and Tivo, you have these disadvantages:

      1) noise
      2) electricity costs - Tivo is probably more efficient than your setup, which is going to eat into your subscription savings.
      3) dependence on unsupported third-party scheduling info
      4) are you able to watch a recorded show while recording something new?

    9. Re:Not a very insightful article by jrasmussen0 · · Score: 1

      If you purchase an integrated Toshiba DVD player/ TIVO you get the Basic Service for life.

      Total cost at Best Buy was $360 after a limited-time discount.

      I don't even have to tell Tivo my name other than my zip code.

      This is a much better deal for me than the $199 Tivo with 40 gig hd, or a $299 Tivo with a 80 gig hd because I didn't have to pay the monthly $13 charge forever.

  39. I hate ATI too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but they have been doing AV type integration for a long time, and they're pretty good at it.

  40. Believe it or not... by DaHat · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Linux support is not everything, nor should it be considered as a sole deciding factor in the building of a PC.

    I do not run Linux, nor do I have any plans to on my desktop, thus Linux support for it matters less to me then your meaningless opinion.

    1. Re:Believe it or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not run Linux, nor do I have any plans to on my desktop, thus Linux support for it matters less to me then your meaningless opinion.

      We regret to inform you that you membership here at Slashdot is now void. Please surrender all karma.

      HAND.

    2. Re:Believe it or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your grandpa ran a buggy whip factory?

  41. Simple is good by erick99 · · Score: 1
    As attracted as I am to hi-tech gadgets and goodies, I end up wanting a simple and elegant solution for most things. I get along fine with a tv a dvd player and a stereo system and a couple of remote controls. In a way, this reminds me of X10 stuff. It is interesting but doesn't it end up being more work in the long run?

    Happy Trails,

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  42. There is a better way by konfoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Antec case is too big, it falls off the back of your other home theater components. And why use a Radeon? Who wants to *only* upscale DVDs to HD resolution? Isn't the point of watching HD being able to receive HD broadcasts too?

    Alternative configuration:

    Mini-ITX system (the case will fit on top of the TV) like those from casetronic.com, with a VIA 800 or better.
    MyHD HD Tunerboard (will upscale DVDs and tune HD/SD broadcasts).
    VGA to component breakout cable connected from the MyHD's output directly to your set.

    Install XP or 2K, put the MyHD IR control app in the winblows startup folder, and never look at the windows desktop again, since the MyHD has an OSD on the HD output.

    With this config you can tune HD broadcasts and upscale DVDs for less.

    1. Re:There is a better way by Geordie+Korper · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you get the old software for MyHD
      because according to the release notes for the current version "DVD mode playback feature - HD full screen output is disabled for playback of copy-protected (scrambled) DVD to follow the DVD CCA license, because MyHD does not have a copy-control circuit." Well I guess you could remove the copy-protection on the DVD ...

      In general I found the mini-itx to be dissapointing for DVD playback. I admit I cheaped out though (in a very expensive way). I got the Fusion HDTV card which does not do DVD decoding and then put it in a Dell desktop with a lot more horsepower which sits under my end table by the couch. If I actually watched TV more than every few weeks I might retry the mini-itx with the MyHD.

  43. Not only price! by TrollBridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Exactly what are you putting together for $200 that you think can substitute for a $2000 system?

    Are you going to watch DVDs on a 17" monitor?

    Are you going to use your $50 3-piece Altecs as a sound system?

    The fact remains that the components of a home theatre that CAN'T be integrated into an affordable PC are going to be the majority of the system's cost anyway. So then the question remains: Why?

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Not only price! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well, I'd think most people already have the audio/visual parts for a Home Theater...you aren't buying the whole thing from scratch...just making an all in one media box to integrate into what you have. I've been building my home audio/theater sound system for years, pieces at a time. Klipschorn front speakers, Klipsch center, Klipsch sub and rear channels...decware tube amp...right now, Carver processor soon to be Outlaw audio dsp....

      So, the media box I'm building is just a component to add into an already existing system. I'd venture to guess most anyone doing this type thing would not be starting from scratch at the media box....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  44. Quality by sarahbau · · Score: 1

    The main reason for building one is picture quality. With an HTPC, you can output your DVDs to the TV through DVI instead of composite, S-Video, or component. This will give you a much better picture quality. Also, as others said, you can use it for more than just DVDs - DivX, HD content in WM9 or Pixlet, games, web surfing, etc. I got 1TB of storage to store all of my DVDs on my HTPC, so I can just scroll through them on the TV, and play the one I want, instead of taking one from the DVD rack, and putting it in the DVD player, then waiting for it to read the DVD, etc. There are a few DVD players coming out these days with DVI ports on them, but they are just about as expensive (or sometimes more expensive) than building an HTPC. They also don't give you all the extra benefits.

  45. MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.mythtv.org

    Available via a knoppix cd ISO

    http://mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    Why.. because you can.. because it's mostly free.. because you control what it does and how it functions and what and when you want to upgrade the software.. what other reasons do you need.

  46. Typical Tom's Article by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    There's no reason to build a computer yourself as long as there's a commercially available solution that's as good. I mean, true that Alienware might cost 3 grand for something you could build for 1.5 grand, but of course it's worth it because we're all consumer whores.

    There are plenty of reasons to build a HTPC, the most obvious one being that you can make it do exactly what you want how you want it. And of course there's price. I'm presonally thinking of building myself a HTPC off of the VIA Mini-ITX boards. I think I can get it down to the size of about two DVD-Roms thick (one for the actual drive, one for the mobo) with a flash-based hard drive.

  47. Why use HDTV at all? by winse · · Score: 1

    I have a friend with a good projector monitor for all his entertainment needs. I think that looks like the right way to go if I was going to get a better tv. Of course I'm sure that someone here can point out some technical merits to owning a HDTV

    --
    this sig is deprecated
    1. Re:Why use HDTV at all? by blackdefiance · · Score: 1

      What you're really talking about with HDTV is a higher resolution signal -- 1080 lines instead of 520 (forget the exact figure). So in theory it doesn't matter whetether you're sending this through a projector or a regular CRT, or plasma, or lcd rear-projector.

      I agree that projectors are a great way to go -- even if the resolution isn't as good, you can make the picure *really* huge in a big (and dark) enough room. And if your projector can handle the resolution then you can have an HDTV signal on your projector, assuming you have a signal coming in over broadcast or cable, and an HDTV tuner.

      I just saw a true HDTV signal on an HDTV-capable tv for the first time last week. It rocks. Better-looking than DVD by a long shot.

  48. Too much dependency on one thing by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    If the PC goes down, so does your entertainment system. The more uses you have for your PC, the greater reliability you have on it. This makes down time that much more of an issue. Take that as opposed to having an actual entertainment center. Sure, your DVD player might go on the fritz, but you can still watch tv without worrying about your PC having problems.

    1. Re:Too much dependency on one thing by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      correction. Greater reliance, not reliability.

    2. Re:Too much dependency on one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, but, if my DVD drive on my PC goes bad, I can either watch the movies I backed up to DivX, rip the DVD's on another PC and watch them on the HTPC, or just throw in another DVD drive that probably cost me $15.

    3. Re:Too much dependency on one thing by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Also, when the last time anyone had to reboot a TV or VCR?

    4. Re:Too much dependency on one thing by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      And you don't have to worry about your TV or VCR getting a virus.

  49. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by UrgleHoth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why build your own PC?

    Why build your own car?

    Why build your own house?

    Why do any of the above when you can just purchase the finished product outright which might be better than what you could build? Because we can.


    For you, the resolute do-it-yourselfer, may I recommend the Dentist in a box

    You thought I was joking? its for real, folks

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  50. mod up this devil lol! great joke in parent post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rofl , someone mod up. that never gets old! i love head :-)

  51. Makes Sense for Most Geeks by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I own a Power Mac G4 MDD 2-processor system connected to an Apple 17-inch digital LCD display. On it, I have the TiVo-like device EyeTV, which allows me to watch conventional cable or antenna TV, and record any show, allowing me to save the programs later, burning them to DVD, as a QuickTime movie, or as a Video CD.

    So, I've been waiting for video cards with HD tuners to arrive. It's inevitable. For one, getting this for me will be cheaper than getting a full HDTV for the time being, because I will not want to skimp on the type and size of TV I want for the household. Another reason is that my computer's screen, while not perfect as Apple's 23-in HD Cinema Display, is suitable enough for a clear, digital signal.

    I suspect that El Gato or other companies will make and sell HD tuner video cards that also support conventional stuff (VGA, conventional TV tuners, etc.) just for the geeks. Most normals will simply drop into Best Buy, buy a TV, and be done with it. For me, however, I want all the mods, baby, and the ability to burn, burn, burn. A conventional HDTV, no matter how nice it looks, can't do it, and I don't want to add yet another computer connected to it to try to get recordings. I'm a one-computer kind of guy in daily use (though I collect plenty of them for nostalgia).

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  52. Why build your own? by GrizzBMX · · Score: 1

    You may as well ask why we code or why we breath! We do it because we can, because we have to. We do it because it DOESN'T Say TiVo or Replay or Phillips or whatever on it. It's a plain beige or silver or purple or neon green box with OUR parts in it. The ones we selected, running the software with the features that WE want. If we want a terabyte of storage so we can capture our HDTV in in TP streams and leave them in TP streams, we CAN! When the we have problems or run into limitations in the software, we can ask 'WHY' and not have to call 'tech support'. We can email the developer directly and ask 'WHEN' it will it be fix? CAN I test the beta? I can use Open Source, you can use commercial, we can use whatever we want.

    Our HTPCs live and die by OUR hands, with the features we want. They are not decided by committee or some tech-stunted marketing/PR puke who is listening to the results of some focus group from Dubuque or Hackensack or Omaha. We the TiVos of the world surpass our humble HTPCs some day? I hope they do. I hope they look at what we are doing with our PCs and say "that's a cool feature, let's steal it."

    Why don't you just ask why Woz built the Apple I or why Linus decided to hack minux. Why indeed.

    GRIZZ

  53. I've been using mine for around 7 months by Lord_Pall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So i've been running an htpc for a bit, and i love it.

    In fact, even my wife loves it.. which is a feat

    I used it for mp3 playback, streaming mp3's, dvd upsampling and playback and television watching. I use a 100 hour directtivo for pvr stuff.

    It's an athlon 1800+, 512 megs of ram, radeon 9000, guillemot soundcard with hacked drivers running optical out to the receiver

    It's in an antec sonata, and is using zalman cooling stuff for everything.. the vidcard has no fan.. That machine is quieter than the tivo.

    It's all running vga straight back to an infocus x1 projector showing on a 92" vutec silverstar screen

    I control it all with a gyration ultra mouse/kbd combo

    Software wise, i use zoomplayer with the cinemaster video codecs going through ffdshow for dvd playback and dscaler for tv watching. It's all running xp professional because i'm not particluarly linux savvy.

    That setup has replaced my television completely. dscaler does a wonderful job of managing the tv signal, and zoomplayer is just phenomenal.

    When we did LOTR:TT extended cut, i ripped both discs to the hard drive, added in trailers on the front end, psa's from the 60's, and spliced in a 10 minute dancing candy intermission in the middle.

    Just hit play, and it goes magically.

    The only complaint i have is the lack of useful hdtv cards. You can receive ota signals, with minimal pvr support, but that's it. Nobody supports signal over cable lines, or anything fancy.

    I assume i'll need some sort of gray market hardware in the future to do that..

    Oh yeah.. the total cost of all of this was less than a decent lcd hdtv set.. and you get a whole lot more..

    If you can't convince you're wife/significant other with the raw windows/linux interface, look at some of the frontends. I used myhtpc (myhtpc.net) for a bit, and it was first rate..

    I abandoned it since my wife is savvy enough to figure it out herself..

    For more info, go to avsforum.com and read their htpc forums.. or linux htpc forums as you desire..

    Highly recommended.

    1. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of ?

    2. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      OT Question - where'd you get your screen, how do you like it, and how much did you pay for it? Thanks.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    3. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by Lord_Pall · · Score: 1

      Screen was 1000 dollars.. 6.0 gain vutec silverstar with an INSANE viewing angle..

      I got it from the avsforum guys on a powerbuy.

      I think it normally retails for 1600..

      It's a silver screen, and is something i couldnt live without.

    4. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      The HTPC didn't come with that feature.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    5. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I tried to read this post, but I saw blah, blah, blah, and "spliced in a 10 minute dancing candy intermission in the middle".

      You interrupted LOTR? For 10 minutes of dancing candy? And you call yourself a geek?

    6. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by caboosesw · · Score: 1

      OT, but I would kill to get some of those old 60's psas and the dancing candy stuff ...

    7. Re:I've been using mine for around 7 months by A.+Jordan · · Score: 1

      What does the modified driver for your Guillemot soundcard do? I have a Guillemot/Hercules Fortissimo III connected optically to my receiver, and I've been a bit frustrated by it's refusal to mix SPDIF from my DVD drive with Windows audio out the SPDIF (it's one or the other, exclusively, with reboots, on their latest driver).

  54. My HTPC - Love It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux / MythTV / Athlon 2500+ / 200GB / 512MB

    I now watch shows when *I* want. PLUS Instant Weather, WebTV (sort of) and news feeds. It plays CDs, (burn too) DVDs, MP3s, Winamp lets me stream all kinds of radio / video content from the web. Visualizations on the TV make for great ambience at a party. Answers the fone / caller ID. Web Server / Programming / Remote X sessions via XDMCP.

    It's also great for learning music (I'm a bass player) because Winamp works well with a keyboard.

    I have it running dual headed with an LCD screen on my coffee table / scan converter to the TV so I get the best of both worlds. I have a wireless keyboard with integrated mouse.

    Left to do: get winamp to run under Wine. Get the IR remote to work. Might want more than basic cable to make full use of the PVR.

    Don't need a subscription service to get listings.

    Wouldn't trade it for anything else.

    If I had to do it all over, I might build a BIG box in my basement to do the capturing / storage and stream the content to the smaller "satelite" computers around my house.

    Ok - I'm done showing off - but you asked what the point was. I guess that's the point...

    cheers

  55. MOD DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too short, first page of ten.
    the full one is there

  56. Modded Xbox works great by scarolan · · Score: 1

    I have an Xbox with a modchip and it works great for the following:

    * Watch regular DVDs
    * Play Xbox games
    * Play NES, SNES, and MAME arcade games (that you already own of course . . . wink wink)
    * Make my friends and family watch boring vacation slideshows (pics are on the computer in the other room)
    * Internet radio
    * Listen to my own MP3 collection

    The list goes on. And you can set something like this up for under 200 bucks nowadays.

    1. Re:Modded Xbox works great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the XBox had a TV tuner, I would agree with you. Without it, you're missing a big chunk of the HTPC functionality.

      (Don't even mention USB-based tuners. USB 1.1 bandwidth isn't anywhere close to what you need for a decent video stream)

    2. Re:Modded Xbox works great by scarolan · · Score: 1

      You're right, that is the main thing that's missing. If it had a video capture/tv tuner it would be the killer device.

  57. Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by ClioCJS · · Score: 2, Funny
    • Let me surf for porn on my 36' TV. This alone should be enough to convert anyone. No need to read the rest of this post.
    • Let me create hundreds of different playlists for my mp3s, rather than burning them to disk.
    • In the rare event of missing a tv program, I can download shows in various obscure codecs (realplayer, xvid, divx5.latest, etc) and watch them on my 36' TV.
    • I can record video straight to AVI, using the capture codec I choose, the compression codec I choose, and the digital image processing plugins that I choose. No PVR gives you the flexibility of virtualdub. I compress shows to 150-400M apiece, and fit far more minutes of video on a 4.5G DVD-R than a standard DVD could ever hope to hold. (Yes, some quality loss, but MUCH better than VHS, and cheaper.)
    • No more buying blank VHS tapes either.
    • I can play Quake3 on my 36' TV.
    • I can record myself winning my favorite PlayStations game, then serve it up for downloads (okay, pulled that one out of my ass).
    • I can backup dvds and play the backups on the same screen (my 36' tv) that my dvd player (my ps2) is hooked up to.
    • I can play dvds much more reliably than with my PS2.
    • I can run emulators and play Atari, C64, etc, on the big tv, not on the lil monitor, as they were meant to originally be played.
    • I can choose my own OS. Can you tweak a hardware based player in the same way?
    • Upon system failure, I can simply replace the failed component rather than the whole thing.
    • By setting up Girder to control things via InfraRed remote, I can not only control my stereo, tv, and channel changing with my remote, but can also start/stop windows media player and basically use one remote for everything -- even pressing "ESC" or nudging my mousepointer around. Girder (www.girder.nl) and the IRMan (www.irman.com) work great together.
    • Last but not least: I AM A GEEK. I ALREADY OWN A COMPUTER. I WILL ALWAYS OWN A COMPUTER. Why pay extra for something that does what my computer can already do? HARDWARE PLAYERS ARE DEAD. GIVE IT UP FOLKS. IT'S A DYING BREED. Jump of the wagon NOW!
    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I think this guy has a 36' TV.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by killfixx · · Score: 1

      "on my 36' TV"

      You have a 432" television?

      Damn that must be sweet!!!

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    3. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      Wow. I don't even have a room in my house to FIT a thirty-six foot TV.

      I'm impressed.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    4. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In the rare event of missing a tv program"

      You need a job, or a life.

    5. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Got a life. Met a hot geek girl on BBSes and it's only gone up from there. We have had unimaginably fun adventures over the past 12 yrs. And I have a job; using it to add 600 sq ft to my house this summer (read: fuck off and sorry about the inches vs feet typo).

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    6. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how come you need to surf for porn?

    7. Re:Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was looking for those pictures of your mom I heard about.

  58. xbox with xbmp rules by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Just get an xbox and install XBMP, it does it all.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  59. The real reason? CONTROL! by eddiegee · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The article is a good primer on why to use an HTPC. I just finished putting together a Home Theater mainly for watching DVDs. The PC is outputting to a Sanyo Z1 projector which is 960x540 native to a 95" diag screen. With an HTPC I can make sure that the PCs output is EXACTLY the right resolution and refresh rate, completely bypassing any resolution scaling that the Projector will do. With anamorphic DVDs and using Powerstrip, Zoomplayer and FFDShow (under Windows, sorry *nix guys!), I can upsample DVDs to play in 960x540 and tweak the image so that my HTPC outputs a picture that will rival $2000 pro-level DVD players. An HTPC will also allow for outputting true 1080p (mainly through WM9, ugh...). Its not trivial to set up, so a complete newbie may be better served with a nice set top DVD player. But if you want excellent output for cheap, go HTPC!

    BTW, I'd love to do this under Linux, but havn't found a player that has the crazed level of customization that Zoomplayer/FFDShow has. Any suggestions?

  60. Modded Xbox, the ultimate HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    An Xbox, modded (in any of a multitude of ways, not all of which require a modchip), plus software like XBMC (Xbox Media Center) or XBMP (Xbox Media Player) -- both based on mplayer and ffmpeg -- makes a truly kick-ass HTPC.

    It has great TV-out, an expandable hard disk, a 100 MBit ethernet port, available remote control, and is very rugged and portable. Not to mention the availability of emulators for MAME, PSX, N64, SNES, GameBoy, etc. And of course there's native Xbox games, which can be played right off the hard-disk!

    BTW, M$ takes a loss on each one.

  61. You're right! by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Don't do anything yourself. Buy everything from a company that's already built it for you. Don't learn how to cook. Drive to the fast food drive through and buy your meals from them. Don't think. Buy your thoughts from someone else.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  62. MOD LEFT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  63. sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have to ask, there's no hope. Welcome to slashdot, where everybody does geeky stuff because it's l337, not because it has to be functional.

  64. Re: Have a look at this: Media Ready 4000 by w3svc_animal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Video Without Boundaries, Inc unveiled the "Media Ready 4000" at the most recent COMDEX..

    Link: "Media Ready 4000"

    They are calling it an "interactive convergence product...hmmm - All I'm looking for is a way to centralize the media functions (i.e. DVD, MP3, etc) so I don't have to blow the speakers in the den to listen to a song while I'm in the pool...

    In all honesty, I think it has 95% of the features most /.ers are looking for, albeit it lacks the DIY aspect.

    The website says it was scheduled for Release in Dec 2003, but I've yet to see where I could buy one... Anyone know where I can pick one up?

    --

    Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

  65. Parent a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adopt a troll today,
    It's fun and profitable!
    for more info please go here

  66. Hobby by John+Girouard · · Score: 1

    Building a working HTPC is about the journey as much as the destination. Like other hobbies (woodworking, for instance), projects like this are a good excuse for buying cool new components (tools).

  67. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by chaotica1974 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why build your own PC?
    I built my HTPC with an Athlon 2600, 1 gig ram, 240 gig of drives, ATI 9600 (HD Output), Hauppauge vid capture for under $1,000. I got to rewind and pause Janet's boob all I wanted and Tivo never knew.

    Why build my own car?
    Ummm, exactly how many people are doing this? I haven't seen that many home built ones on the road. Restored yes, home built no.

    Why build my own house?
    So I can configure room layout, ceiling heights, carpets, windows and all the extras that don't cost much to change *before the house is built*

    Why do any of the above? Because I just ain't average enough for the prebuilt stuff

  68. How do you do it? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
    Video capture from my DishPVR for conversion to DVD



    Do you have a website I can read?

    1. Re:How do you do it? by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      I just run the S-Video cable from the PVR to my ATI all-in-wonder and capture it that way. It captures to MPEG. Then I run it through Pinnacle, set up some basic menus and burn it. It takes some time, but that's the only way I've figured out how to do it so far. I'm about to try to read the data right off of the DishPVR hard disk and see if I can skip the capture step (and get better quality). I'll let you know if I can get it working.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    2. Re:How do you do it? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Please do. I don't have a PVR yet but I am always looking for info on making backups of TV shows I have recorded. Or will record.

    3. Re:How do you do it? by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      I added you to my friends list so I won't forget ;-)

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  69. The flexability.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Time-shifting rented DVD's is nice (I don't always watch them right away).

    2) Time-shifting TV is the ONLY way to go.

    3) Music ripper/jukebox with fancy visuals is nice.

    4) Mplayer compatible video player works out great for viewing new episodes of Red vs. Blue.

    5) Web browsing.

    6) DVD burning.

    7) Expandable.

    8) Upgradeable.

    9) Skinnable.

    There are certainly a couple of trade-offs, like those times you realize xmltv needs to be upgraded AFTER you've missed recording your favorite program. But if your a Slashdot geek these problems should be right up your alley. Anyone belly aching about the cost or convenience of a HTPC is probably not up for it. But for those of us who are, the additional features and flexibility will trump any store bought PVR any day (and if it doesn't, well just write the extra software!).

    Note to potential HTPC do-it-yourself article writers: Use either Mandrake, Gentoo or Debian (if your new to Linux or don't like configuring things yourself: Mandrake). You'll save a lot of time because you can install all the neccisary packages to run MythTV from a single command (ie 'urpmi MythTV' if you've set up PLF or Thacs rpm archive). Its REALLY not that difficult, but if you don't enjoy this sort of project (challenge?) why waste your time. Btw, Hauppauge's WinTV-250 is the way to go (at least for the MythTV project).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  70. I built a HTPC two weeks ago by J3M · · Score: 1
    and it was because I could. It wasn't cheap, however. The total cost was around $1750, but I've got a beast of a machine that can do everything that I need it to, and should for a long while. This list includes:

    • DVR
    • On Demand TV
    • Music Jukebox (entire CD collection a click away)
    • DVD Watching
    • DVD Recording (backups and home movies)
    • FM Receiver
    • Remote control of PC apps
    • Dual monitors (LCD and TV)
    • Convert VHS to DVD
    • Plays latest games
    • Internet surfing on big screen
    • Cool factor


    I now have complete control over my entire mulitmedia experience, because everything is being done in one box. It's been a lot of fun getting everything to work together. So why did *I* do it? Because I'm a geek who loves to do it myself.
    --
    Aych tea tea pea colon slash slash slash dot dot org slash
  71. Why I Built My HTPC by BRock97 · · Score: 4, Informative
    When I first looked into buing the components to power a HD monitor (i.e. a 65" HD TV with no tuner), the equipment would have cost me over $800. I would have needed an OTA (off the air) tuner, a progressive DVD player, and all the cabling to hook these things up. Plus, the stand alone DVD player wasn't very customizable.

    Finally, I settled on buying a computer to do all of this. I had quite a few of the parts I needed; the only thing I was missing was an OTA tuner card, the DVD software, and the sound card. I already had decided on Windows XP (which I will explain below), so I was set.

    The DVD software I went with was called TheaterTek and the benefits it had over a standard player are numerous:

    • Ability to resize any move to any resolution including 1080i
    • Ability to expand the movie to get rid of the black bars around the edge (i.e. anamorphic widescreen)
    • Ability to save these changes for each individual movie
    • Using Windows to further enhance the output using various filters (i.e. fdshow filters)
    The output from this setup was incredible. Watching DVDs at 1080i with the image cleaned up is so much better than 480p. I highly recommend it.

    The other problem was getting the actual HD content from the main networks. Locally in Omaha, NE ABC, CBS, and NBC have been broadcasting in HD for a while, so an OTA tuner was the way to go. A stand alone box was going for $600 locally, and I had found a card that does it for $200, the MyHD OTA Tuner Card. The picture quality is incredible and the performance was great on my 850 Duron. It gave me everything the set top box would have done and also Tivo like functionality out of the box, something that still isn't available for HD yet.

    As I mentioned before, I went with Windows XP as everything mentioned above is only available for that platform. Also, due to the mature video drivers on Win32 vs. Linux for the ATI card I went with, I was able to tweak more aspects of the output to the HD monitor through a program called Powerstrip. I tried DVD playback on Linux (mplayer), but it had no where near the functionality of the Theatertek software. Also, I did look into the pcHDTV card available, but it isn't nearly has mature as it should be for a commercial HD tuner card (the only user fiendly app I have found, MythTV, has very limited integration with the pcHDTV card. That is changing quickly, though).

    All in all, I highly recommend making a HTPC if you have the time. Plus, you don't need that Microsoft Windows Media Center Edition crap to make it work, just plain old XP will do you fine.

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  72. Why do it yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try writing off a tivo on your tax forms. You can write off a computer as a work related expense... Yes, I am posting this anonymously for a reason :)

  73. I don't understand by Srividya · · Score: 2, Informative

    The author says this HTPC does what Tivo does, but it cannot. It does not have software to download television listings and intelligently parse them based on user preferences. This elaborate P.C. setup cannot be told to even do basic Tivo tasks such as "record all showings of my favorite show".

    This is not an equivalent device.

  74. Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by melevitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The number one reason for me to build my own Linux-based PVR is privacy.

    Did you know that Tivo tracks not only what shows you watch, but exaclty what parts of shows you replay or skip over?

    Now, I know it's *supposed* to be anonymous. And I do believe them when they say they aren't selling the data *at the moment*.

    I also know they have systems in place to anonymize the data.

    But can you (or Tivo) guarentee that they will *never* be bought out be someone less ethical?

    Can you guarentee that Tivo won't get a new CEO who decides selling your viewing habits to direct mail advertisers is more lucrative? (Imagine if Darl McBride went to Tivo instead of SCO).

    That's my biggest reason for me to put together my own PVR.

    Of course, there's also flexibility. I get to decide exactly what capabilities I want, not the marketing department of a profit-motivated company.

    1. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Proof this is already happening:

      Janet Jackson most watched moment among TiVo users

    2. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you know that Tivo tracks not only what shows you watch, but exaclty what parts of shows you replay or skip over?

      Yup.

      Now, I know it's *supposed* to be anonymous.

      And if you read the posts by people who have investigated this it is anonymous. The data that contains key presses, show info, etc. is sent without any identifying information whatsoever. TiVo has further stated that the data is stored in completely separate databases that have no interfacing between one another.

      And you can always call them and opt-out entirely if you want. It's been confirmed that when you do so the data is never sent at all. (Which would make it very difficult to track)

      But can you (or Tivo) guarentee that they will *never* be bought out be someone less ethical?

      Nope. And if that happens then we'll simply have to see if they change the privacy policy, and what changes are made.

      Can you guarentee that Tivo won't get a new CEO who decides selling your viewing habits to direct mail advertisers is more lucrative?

      Won't happen unless they're bought out -- which is the only way the privacy policy can change in such a drastic manner.

      The paranoia over viewing habits is really quite amazing. I really don't care that much, particularly since it's anonymized. Shrug.

    3. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by isaac · · Score: 1
      And if you read the posts by people who have investigated this it is anonymous. The data that contains key presses, show info, etc. is sent without any identifying information whatsoever.

      Yeah, from YOUR phone number. Thanks to ANI, they know exactly who you are, even if your unit's serial number isn't sent in the data. Tada. Your data is not anonymous.

      Of course, all modern cable boxes record and report similar information to your cable provider and every satellite TV box requires a land line to phone home, so Tivo's not really doing anything outside the mainstream.

      You can't dance with the devil and keep your privacy. The only way to truly keep your viewing habits to yourself is to watch only broadcast tv and videos you've bought with cash. Otherwise, you have to accept the fact that everyone who cares already knows everything you watch, and will try to use that information to sell you more crap.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    4. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, from YOUR phone number. Thanks to ANI, they know exactly who you are, even if your unit's serial number isn't sent in the data. Tada. Your data is not anonymous.

      And what's to say that any of the data on the ANI record is the same as any of the data for your TiVo account? TiVo does not have your phone number unless you gave it to them of your own free will.

      Not to mention that a rather large number of people don't use dial-up for updates anyway, but get it over broadband. No ANI there.

    5. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that a rather large number of people don't use dial-up for updates anyway, but get it over broadband. No ANI there.

      There are these things called IP addresses... networked computers have them... they can be easily logged... oh, never mind.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    6. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      There is this thing called NAT... and there are entire apartment and homeowner communities that use it...

      Oh, nevermind. Put your tinfoil hat back on.

    7. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      There is this thing called NAT... and there are entire apartment and homeowner communities that use it... ;) I know. Although, I would submit that most people use NAT for a single family home.

      (Personally, I don't have a problem with Tivo monitoring these things. I'm with the others who believe it may eventually help shows that I like stay on the air.)

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  75. Home grown won't log your usage... by mmuskratt · · Score: 1

    I read a quote that TiVo used its "technology" to measure viewing habits during the SuperBowl. I hate the idea that someone would be metering my viewing habits...so doing it myself is even more optimal.

    --
    man rtfm
  76. Re:Home grown won't log your usage... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Even though the metric it tracks by is 'postal code,' and therefore not very resolvable to an individual, and even though you can turn this functionality off?

    Me, I'd want TiVo to know exactly what I'm watching, so that said shows won't get cancelled for lack of viewership.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  77. Not so redundant by DumbSwede · · Score: 2, Informative
    To the moderator(s) who marked this redundant: I am at work right now, and the site linked to is blocked. This is the first complete post of the article text and is much appreciated (one earlier failed to get the complete text). As often as sites get slashdotted and go down, it is prudent for one or two of the early posters to post the text (which is often all we are interested in without all the bandwidth hogging ad stuff).

    Since this was posted A.C., it doesn't appear to be a case of Karma whoring, and even if it where, I would gladly give up the mod points to view the article.

    Chances are the moderator(s) who marked the parent to this post redundant, will not see this comment of mine. But I for one appreciate the effort to include the text so all can see. Perhaps the moderator(s) thought the text had already been posted in full (it hadn't). Even so, this was a very early post and should have been given the benefit of the doubt that earlier article text postings hadn't shown up yet.

    Save negative mods for when they are really needed.
    Like the guidelines say, focus on modding up.
    Thankfully, most moderators modded this up informative, not redundant.

    1. Re:Not so redundant by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      To the moderator(s) who marked this redundant: I am at work right now, and the site linked to is blocked.

      The downmod is most likely the result of this childish tweaking:

      "However the monitor is designed to resolve a higher fnord resolution..."

      "Despite the fnord heat issue with we liked the Overture..."

      "When watching TV at 480p, the ATI doesn**t improve fnord upon the standard TV tuner. "

      (I've seen worse in copied articles before, but that doesn't make this less annoying.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Not so redundant by Gherald · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I've often thought /. should automagically mirror the text of articles as a "courtesy" to sites with low bandwidth.

      After all, Google stores text cache so it must be legal, right?

    3. Re:Not so redundant by WM_NCDESTROY · · Score: 2, Funny

      You see the Fnords? your conditioning must be wearing off. Remember: IF YOU DON'T SEE THE FNORD IT CAN'T EAT YOU, DON'T SEE THE FNORD, DON'T SEE THE FNORD . . . The Illuminati must be trying to Immanentize the Eschaton!

      --
      posted via satellite
  78. My Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I built a HTPC for several reasons.

    The area where I live doesn't offer a PVR with the cable receiver box. This is important because you want the box to turn on and switch to the correct channel to start recording (why didn't I go with any of the satellite boxes that do? cause they're all a bunch of cheap bastard aholes that's why). With a HTPC you can use 3rd party software like girder and the serial port or IR port to control the cablebox. Yes I know you can just set the cablebox to turn on and change to the correct channel but what if you forget? You're screwed..... unless you have a HTPC. With a HTPC, you can actually, connect to it and schedule stuff you forgot to schedule.

    Another reason is clutter, all these devices take up space I don't have to spare. I can consolidate down to 1 box instead of a PVR, DMR, DVD player.... although I still prefer to have a standalone dvd player... the point is I CAN consolidate down.

    Another plus is all the stuff you record can be transfered to other devices or shared with other people... uh not that I condone such things.

    Just MHO

  79. Here's a reason I haven't seen discussed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    Concern: Privacy.

    According to Reuters or, if you prefer, CNN, that moment was not only the most viewed and re-viewed slice of airtime for the Superbowl time slot, but for ALL time slots since they've been monitoring their customers' viewing habits. Now, I'm no member of the tinfoil hat club, but I think someone even suggesting that they should be able to or should attempt to analyze what I watch (via broadcast TV no less!) with OR without my permission is just a little creepy. Wal-Mart's taking it on the chin for proposing a tracking system for products they sell, but at least they've got a plausible business-related reason for it (not to mention the tech's "out there in the future" somewhere so we'll supposedly have a chance to develop societal guards against it's misuse. Mmm hmm. And I wonder how many geeks added a "kill switch" to their OnStar box last week just to make sure those "private moments" remained private...)

    Solution: Do-It-Yourself

  80. OOoooo...soooo close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "watch DVDs, TV, play CDs and MP3s, fake Tivo, Fax machine, answering machine all from my PC."

    You forgot teleconferencing, talking on the phone(VOIP)..and computer stuff (stream video, surf web, check news/stocks, games)

    " All controlled via remote and piped to my TV."

    See..right there..teeveee...
    Try 'lcd projector' and 6.1 speakers for full-wall jaw-droppingness at less cost than rear-projection teevee of half the size.

    **for bonus points bring said projector and laptop to party for MTV video wall/music

    ***for extra bonus points leave porn on laptop to be 'accidentally' discovered by open minded women you know at the party and watch a drunken mini-orgy break out...and they say background sex isn't infectious :)

  81. 2 words. by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Apple Computer.

    1. Re:2 words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one "innovation", which was basically just making a computer for cheaper. Every other innovation since then they've been a big company.

    2. Re:2 words. by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      Thank you!!! That's exactly my point!!!

      Only a small, small, fraction of innovaction doesn't come from big corporations. And what is Apple today, A BIG CORPORATION! So by your logic they can no longer innovate!

      Think about everything you use every day, the chairs you sit on, the gas in your car, your car's engine, airplanes, food processing techniques, shipping route innovations, the restaurant equipment that prepares your food, medicine for god's sake!

      Once again in case you all missed it: only a tiny, tiny fraction of innovation comes from outside big corporations.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  82. Re: Have a look at this: Media Ready 4000 by anandrajan · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link to MediaReady 4000. Very useful.

    Do you know how it compares to Interact-TV's MC1000?

    --
    Anand Rangarajan anand@cise.ufl.edu
  83. Getting video to the HDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question, what's the best way to get video from your PC (with DVI, VGA, and SVHS-out) to your HDTV that doesn't have a DVI input? I'm trying to sort out the myriad adapters, but I'm hesistant to order something blindly hoping it will look better than the SVHS-out I am currently using (not too good a picture for playing games with SVHS on my HDTV).
    TIA...

    1. Re:Getting video to the HDTV? by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you only have component inputs, ATI's cards can output component HD with a $30 dongle you can order on their website. MMmmmm... giant HD video games.

      HD tuner cards with VGA outputs can be connected with a VGA->Component breakout cable, as long as your HD card supports YPrPb (normal VGA is RGB). All the ones I've seen that have their own outputs support this.

      My combo uses both, and connects the output of the radeon to the loopback input of the HD card (kinda like an old voodoo 3d accelerator) with another VGA->Component cable.

      I use a MyHD MDP-100, which they no longer make. But the MDP-120 will do the same. You don't need one of these at all to get desktop/game output, though-- just that ATI adapter. (which only works with ATI cards-- the reason it's cheap is that the card already supports component out. It's just a pin rearranger.)

  84. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because we can"

    Then I want my own gene-splicing / mutation / cloning lab

    [pinky to the mouth]

    muahahahaha

    muahaHAHAHAHAHA

    MUAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA

  85. Will $700 get you HD recording without an HTPC? by raygundan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just barely. An HTPC really is a good deal, depending on what you're trying to do.

    It depends entirely on what you want to do. Consider my situation-- I had an HD-ready set, and wanted an OTA tuner and the ability to record HD broadcasts digitally.

    Like a lot of people around here, I had an old PC laying around doing nothing. I bought an HDTV tuner card for $120 (used, new would have been $199) and stuck it in. Now I can record 10 hours of HDTV, and tune my local stations. A standalone tuner box would have been a minimum of $300, and the ability to record (maybe with a digital VCR) would have been another $300.

    The MyHD MDP-100 tuner card has the nice side effect of being able to play back DVDs, and upscale the output to 1080i or 720p digitally. And because it's a hardware MPEG card, it doesn't need much of a system to run it. A PIII and 128MB of PC100 is well more than it really needs.

    It wasn't $700 or $200, though-- it was $120. Aesthetically, it fits entirely behind the TV, and the one case fan isn't too noisy. Because I only use it for 2 or 3 shows a week, it's off the rest of the time and noise is not an issue.

    Down the road, I'll build a better system-- but heck, even at $700, it beats out a 1080i DVD player (or standalone scaler and normal DVD), OTA HD tuner, and HD recording solution price-wise. A $30 ATI dongle lets me play PC games on the big screen in HD, too, so add an XBox with a component kit to that list.

    They really can be price-competitive with a lot of other things, and a good quiet case and heatsink with underclocked CPU can really give you some advantages you can't get without spending a TON of money to do it another way.

    When the HD Tivo is $300, *then* I'll have something to switch to. (but it still won't do the games, DVD scaling, or archive the HD shows to Xvid or WM9-- so my HTPC will probably soldier on.)

  86. I haven't read any posts but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why build one?

    I have a Panasonic AE100. It is the same resolution as DVDs 8??x484. Sure, I can trust my DVD to give me the best quality, but I know something that it doesn't... I know the exact size of my screen pixel for pixel. With a computer I not only can get pixel for pixel the best quality out of the projector but I can also put movie trailers and such on before a movie... for real geek appeal. Not to mention that it is cool.

  87. Why I did it... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    The home theatre was already there. I had an HD-ready set, and a receiver. I also had my girlfriend's old gutted gateway PC just sitting around. I bought a MyHD MDP-100 HD tuner card (I got a used one for $120, but new is only $199 last time i looked).

    The cheapest I could have managed the ability to tune HD would have been a $300 set-top box. That doesn't count the cost of adding recording ability, a digital scaling 1080i DVD player, or the ability to play games on the big screen. To be fair, the games required me to scrounge an old radeon and buy the $30 HD dongle from ATI. Nontheless-- the cheapest, bare-bones HD tuning solution was still more than DOUBLE the cost of sticking an HD card in a PC, and gaining both HD tuning and recording.

    Still, there was absolutely no cheaper way to get HDTV into my system than the HTPC route. Not by a long shot.

    If you don't have an old PC handy (it doesn't have to be much-- a hardware MPEG card does all the work) it will cost you more-- but I'd argue that you still won't find HD tuning, HD recording, and digital DVD scaling to 1080i for the cost of a cheap (or used) PC and an HD card.

  88. Okay, another 2 words by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Hewlett-Packard.

    1. Re:Okay, another 2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, do you enjoy shooting yourself in the foot? HP hasn't been a garage company for 50 years!

  89. Why I built out a HTPC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not really because it does any more than my regular DVD player - a Malata 520 region free player with progressive scan, optical and coax digital audio and even a VGA connector but for another reason.

    I can replace the DVD drive in the PC if it happens to stop working or if there are new formats available. I don't need to incorporate another player to our entertainment system or deal with any changes in how it works. When the drive in the stand-alone player quits it becomes basically disposable.

    The HTPC can also play downloaded MPEG and other video files on the television or to any screen I would decide to attach, plays MP3s through the stereo and even can play audio and video files over the network from a computer in another room. I can also view web pages or digital photos or anything else I'd like to see in a larger screen or to share with others.

    The only downside I can think of quickly is that running Windows it needs to be rebooted (regularly) on occasion. Oddly enough the Malata also needs a power cycle if we play a music CD on it and its built-in screen saver starts up. DVDs viewed after playing a CD remain cut off on all sides on the Malata 520 :(

  90. Can TIVO do this? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is my DVR system. Actually, it's two systems. My DVR has a 1.4 Athlon, 256 megs of RAM, 10 gig HD for apps and OS, 80 gig for MP3s, 160 RAID-0 partition for recording, 120 HD for video storage/playback, and an ATI All-in-Wonder 8500DV. It's connected under the floor to the TV/receiver in my living room. Thus, you cannot hear it from the living room.

    My second system is a cheap PIII 550 with an 80 gig HD. It too holds my MP3 collection and is primarily for playing music. However, it too is connected to the living room TV and reciever and can play previously recorded content via the network. Thus, when the DVR is recording something, I can still play music or watch shows.

    Also, the music computer has two soundcards. Winamp uses my Audigy2 and everything else uses a cheap Hercules card. Thus, I can even listen to music while someone else is watching a recorded show!!!

    Also, that music computer is wired to nearly every receiver to the house, so I can listen not only from the living room, but from the kitchen, bedroom, etc. (I'm working on getting the bathroom's wired with speakers.) And I should point out that ATI's Remote Wonder works throughout my huge two-story farm house.

    With my homebuilt DVR systems, I can do the following:

    1. Record shows, edit out the commercials, and burn them to DVD.

    2. Pause, rewind, and fast-forward live TV.

    3. Know what's currently on TV and what's coming up. (With ATI's Guideplus/EasyView software, included with its All-in Wonder cards.)

    4. Access my entire 900+ CD collection in MP3 format from nearly every room in the house. (Via TightVNC.)

    5. Create a playlist of ALL my favorite songs, which I can access with one button from my Remote Wonder. That playlist is over four days long; it's like having my own radio station!

    5. Normalize the volume of my CD/MP3 collection via my Audigy 2 card. That's important. A roommate had one of those 200 disc CD players, but considering that nearly every CD has a different volume, I considered it worthless.

    6. Rip my DVD collection so I can play them back without all the FBI crap, from nearly every room in the house.

    7. And most importantly, I do not have to pay a monthy service, or have it randomly record shows it feels I might want to watch.

    Sure, my system probably cost a lot, (I built them both out of mostly spare parts) but considering it does exactly what I want and there is no commercially available alternative, I find it extremely valuable. Heck, even my wife can use it!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Can TIVO do this? by FattMattP · · Score: 1

      What software are you using for PVR?

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    2. Re:Can TIVO do this? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I'm just using the software that comes with ATI's cards. It allows me to do everything I want, so I see no reason to switch to a third party program.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  91. HDTV a must by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    I built one as my HDTV has a VGA input and supports 1280X720(720p) without upconversion to 1080i. That made it very easy. I save my DVD's to my hard drive. If I'm watching TV, any movie in my collection is just 3 clicks away. I also use it to steam audio when friends are over. The best part, something everybody hates me for, is that I can whip out the wireless keyboard and use Google to prove to people that they're talking out of their ass. I'm a huge fan of racing simulators http://sourceforge.net/projects/motorsport/ and the widescreen display is perfect for that type of gaming. If you don't have a HDTV that supports 720p natively or just have a non-HDTV I wouldn't reccomend it.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  92. It's not cost effective unless we're talking HDTV. by raygundan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plain and simple, tuning and recording HDTV is still freaking expensive. A $500 computer and $200 HD tuner card gets you all the functionality of:

    1. HD tuner (standalone cost, $300+)
    2. HD recorder/PVR (standalone cost, $400+)
    3. 1080i/720p DVD player (standalone cost, $250)
    4. PC games in HD on big screen (closest comparison is an XBox with an HD kit-- $200)
    5. A high-end scaler/filter box for HD video. ($500+)

  93. More good HTPC info and why you should build one. by jtorral · · Score: 1

    This link has all the info you need on why you should go HTPC. http://www.hometheaterdiscussion.com/forums/forumd isplay.php?&forumid=27 I personally run one and dont see myself moving to another video source until something better comes out.

  94. Mod parent up! by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    He's right, and not just about pr0n; there are lots of activities that are better on a huge screen. If you decide not to hook up a TV tuner, it's still fun.

  95. No comparison... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry sparky, but XBMP on an outdated 700MHz system can't hold a candle to a real live modern HTPC.

  96. Why build your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three words: Better customer support.

  97. A simple addition to your setup to do both... by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your setup is very similar to mine. I use a MyHD card to output to the set as well.

    But I wanted the desktop, too. So I bought a couple of VGA->Component RCA breakout cables and set things up like this:

    Radeon HD Component Dongle -> Component RCA to VGA breakout cable -> MyHD VGA input

    and

    MyHD VGA output -> VGA to Component RCA breakout cable #2 (just like your current setup.

    All this does is allow you to use the handy source switching built in to your MyHD card to toggle between 1080i desktop from the Radeon, and 1080i video from your MyHD card. Works like a charm.

    Cables available here:

    Short cable for connecting your Radeon to your MyHD

    Long cable for connecting your MyHD to your HDTV's component input

    With a few cables, you can do what the above poster did AND still have your desktop. Pressing the "HD" button on your MyHD remote will toggle between desktop and video.

  98. doubt no more by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt if anybody has a monitor bigger than my 42" HDTV-ready projection TV

    We've set up far larger in the lab and for tradeshows. There are many Network Control Centers and high end users with monitors that are equally 'large'.

    Want to see an outdoor example? Visit downtown Tokyo any day of the week...there is really no limit to how large a 'desktop' can or should be.

  99. because i need LESS features than store-bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My HTPC has no TV tuner, no need for commercial skipping. Everything i watch comes off bit torrent. Why should i pay for a tivo? its not compatible with my network, i cant repair it when it breaks, and i have no use for 99% of its features.

    Take control over your life, give up the airwaves. the advertisers have won, and the spoils of war are a million empty minds.

  100. It is about the deinterlacer chipset..... by bodland · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rather than computer. I did try though...in a quest for superior picture quality. I assumed that the computer would provide a better picture quality than my non-progressive scan DVD using the onboard iDCD Farjuoda de-interlacer chip set in my InFocus X1 projector. I was wrong. I did hook up my iBook to my MOTU 828 interface I use for music recording this was to get 5.1 audio out of the iBook. The MOTU has 24 bit decoders and optical out which went in nicely to the Sony amp. Anyway....from studying deinterlacers and how exactly DVD's are played back, mastered and what the aspect ratios and frame rate of film I concluded the quality of the DVD image resides in 1. the mastering technique, i.e. Film to digital transfer method used 2. The quality of the print used in the mastering 3. And the sophistication of the de-interlacing. Most progressive DVD players have deinterlacing chipsets that take the information from the DVD produce a progressive scan image. The quality and sophistication of these chipset varies greatly. Do some googles on "deinterlacing chipset". In addition they also provide proprietary functions to reduce and eliminate digital artifacts that are the result of image processing. When I used my iBook to play back the image I did get a higher resolution image but it was harsh and very non-film like. The deinterlacer built into the projector is designed to produce a "film like" quality to the image. Taking great pains to reduce the rainbow effect and other artifacts like pixelation, jaggies and chroma abberations that result form the hardware and convertsion. So keep in mind watching films on DVD's is a much different activity than watching HDTV. Film is an art is for the most part is still an analog process (barring the increasing number of digitally shot movies like 28 Days Later that was later converted to film) So having seprately engineered components to produce the appropriate signal is inherently going to be better. A DVD player to watch movies, HDTV tuner to watch HDTV and a monitor capable of producing quality images from a variety of sources is the way to go. That is if you are really picky about what hits the back of your eyeball.

  101. Um, it seems to be 2 months late already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I seriously doubt it will be anything more than a blip in the HTPC market.

  102. Re: Have a look at this: Media Ready 4000 by w3svc_animal · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately I don't have hands-on experience with the MR4000, but now that I've seen your link to the Telly-MC, I may just have to reevaluate previous opinions.

    The mini-ITX form factor is a definite positive, virtually ensures quiet operation.

    Any discoveries on the MSRP of the Telly unit? I do know the MR4000 was expected to be in the USD 400 price range.
    I'd really like to try one of these two units out, they seem to have the ability to do everything I need.

    Thanks for the insight.

    --

    Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

  103. Paranoia, Paranoia, Paranoia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You left your aluminum foil hat at home again! Tivo is reading your brainwaves.


    You privacy freaks just kill me. You claim to spend a gazillion bucks building a system with a free operating system and with free, but only sketchily functional software so that nobody can track you, yet you buy it all with a credit card over the Internet...or you pull the money out of the bank with your ATM card. Or you write a check and show your driver's license.


    And you worry that Tivo might know that you were fixated on Janet Jackson's boob? Talk about misguided priorities! And the moderators who scored you as insightful are almost as whacked as you are!

  104. Instant on by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    One major requirement for this sort of thing, or any 'appliance'-like PC, should be that it is (nearly) instantly ready for use when you switch it on. That means you shouldn't have to wait for it to boot, nor have to select fuctions (playing dvd's, playing a file from disk) using a mouse/keyboard in an awkward position. If it's to be a true appliance, it should
    - boot instantly
    - be fully controllable using a remote control

    Are there any good solutions that will let you boot a PC instantly? (from flash, perhaps).

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Instant on by Adrenochrome · · Score: 1

      Moot point. If you're using it as a PVR, it never gets turned off.

  105. How to buy a $50,000 car for $2000 by rs79 · · Score: 1

    Buy one 20 years old and fix it up, bit by bit. In 5-10 years, if you've been careful, and barring catastrophe, you will not have lost a cent.

    Same deal with home theatre. You can go out right now and drop a wad of cash on a consumer grade turnkey system. Or, you can go out right now and buy all the bits you need and build its equivalent, cheaper.

    But if you'll notice, most of the people here who have checked in as having done this are doing it incrementally. Start with what you have lying around, or maybe buy 1 or two bits and pieces, then as time goes on you can add this, upgrade that.

    This way you're not zapped with a big upfront cost, you get to have fun doing it and you learn about how this stuff really works more so than just reading about it someplace.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  106. Once again they miss Linux by O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O · · Score: 1

    Linux (read: VDR) is the only solution that supports digital TV, a.k.a. MPG-DVB. Microsoft etc. do not. Plus it let's you record multiple programs at the same time using multiple DVB cards, cutting out ads and much more. Plus it is free :-)

  107. It's Simple by futuresheep · · Score: 1
    My HTPC play my music files on my stereo while displaying nifty xmms plugins on my HDTV screen; it shows image slideshows, checks the weather for me, records tv shows, plays dvd's, plays videos files that I put on the server, has a nifty web-based front end for setting my tv recording schedule, works with a great HDTV PC card that has no silly DRM issues, is skinnable, rips music for me in the format that I choose, and above all, outside the cost of the hardware, is FREE and OPEN. Check it out here:

    MythTV

    Find me a third party DVR that does all that!

  108. SVCD? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    If I may ask why are you considering SVCD?

    In my pre-DVD-R days I used to toy around with SVCD compression, and all the nightly conversions really switched me off to SVCDs, plus the fact that they could only hold about an hour of good quality video.
    Have you considered DVD-Rs?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:SVCD? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      I'm recordding hour-long episodes from TV, and I don't have a DVD-burner.

      Therefore, its either convert-to-SVCD and watch on the DVD player, or copy to VHS.

  109. duh... (mod -5k, repetitive?) by wolf_m16 · · Score: 0

    to control your home theatre of course... duh

  110. Reason for a HTPC instead of separat HT system by Zekaric · · Score: 1

    I'm probably not unique here but the main reason for me to have a HTPC is because I have such a small appartment that I don't have room for a PC and HT system. The PC sits in the living room and acts as a answering machine, DVD player, TV, etc. However I will say that I am not too impressed with the HTPC that I built. DVD playback isn't optimum, if it has trouble it can sometimes take for ages to get past a trouble spot on the disc. TimeShifting isn't all that great, voice and video are never in sync. TV is ok. PVR is not as easy to set up recordings, you'd think being a computer with so much freedom of interface that they would be able to do it right. Asus P5 MB ATI AIW 8500DV ATI remote (ok but doesn't work with all programs.) SB Audigy with digital link to Digital Speakers Sony DVD Rom Sony 21" Monitor (Enough for my small apartment) Software: ATI DVD player (Has problems dealing with trouble spots on DVDs.) ATI TV (time shifting isn't top notch.) ATI's CD player I have issues with so I end up using winamp 2. I have issues with winamp 3. I use the computer for development and art so it is used as a computer as well.

  111. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by log0n · · Score: 1

    Why do any of the above? Because I just ain't average enough for the prebuilt stuff

    *UP*

    Some of us prefer to be atypical :)

  112. I'm almost there by humble_moon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm building one as we speak, so I know a little more than most hearsay going on right now.

    For not much more money, you can have the same exact performance, plus the added bonus of _burning_ recorded tv to dvd/vcd..

    People saying it's expensive forget that as long as you have a hardware decoder, you're processor could literally be a pII.. hardware decoders do all the number crunching you need. the biggest requirement in this whole thing being a HUGE HDD.

    on to my setup, i'm using my actual PC for now, slowly gathering all the parts.

    heres why someone would do this insttead of tivo: (ms already knows this, hence MCE.)
    It's a tivo... it's a jukebox... it's a game console... it's A COMPUTER.

    sure, if you think of it as just a tivo replacement, it's one hell of an expense.. but if you think of it as a PC with about $100 exta dollas wrapped up in it, it's one hell of a deal. Plus its very cool imho

  113. Re:umm, price?! OK if you have server now. by citabjockey · · Score: 2, Informative

    So what if you already have a home server PC? This was my situation when I started to consider a tivo box. I thought it silly to have essentially two equivilant computers systems up 24/7. So I added the PVR function and TV video out to the PC.

    Asthetics are not an issue as the PC sits in a closet. I pass remote control commands to it via a IR->RF->IR remote extender. The system is *almost* headless except for the TV. I run a long s-video cable from the PC to the TV for display and run MythTV for the PVR function. All up, the cost of adding PVR capability to the system was about $200 -- which included a cheap tuner/capture card and a 180 GB disk. Myth gives me free schedule updates and a very cool web based interface for programming the recordings. Even my wife is happy!

    To do this from scratch is tougher. A budget for the system would be upwards of $800 or even $1000 to get a reasonable machine. Off the shelf may be better unless you already have a server. Take a gander at Here for pix of my *unfinished* HTPC.

  114. Various thoughts by dago · · Score: 1

    Beyond integration, here are a few reasons why :

    - No equivalent : sorry, but tivo is US only. Other PVR are just appearing now at very high costs. Built mine 1 year ago.

    - P2P : which other devices let you download movies/games/audio for free ?

    - Which self-respecting geek doens't have already a server running 24/7 at home ? Getting it HTPC just requires a TV Card.

    - Integration : audio + video
    + pictures + news at your fingertips. From the same box. I may add as well games, but I don't use them.

    - Network openness : samba for files, web-based remote controlling (heck, even wap-based for p2p)

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  115. This article is not very well written. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

    The upsampled DVD is the more important feature in our HTPC today. Even if cost is no object, the HTPC approach to DVD can offer better picture quality than any stand-alone unit. DVDs are recorded with 480 lines of resolution, however it turns out that upsampling the video to a 720p or 1080i resolution for HDTV and HDTV-ready televisions will offer the best quality.

    That's a load of crap. I have a SamSung unit that upconverts the DVD to 1920x1080, but that does nothing for the quality on a digital display. Why? Because the digital display upconverts the signal to it's native resolution.

    These kiddies need to go back to HD School.

    PS - If you are watching HD on a non-digital display, you might as well be watching HD on an etch-a-sketch. There is little point in 1920x1080 if you are staring at a 60Hz refresh and can see the wavery effect of any CRT over 32".

  116. Other options by stedlj · · Score: 1, Insightful

    HDTV is still very new here are some major problems.

    1) HDTV's are pricey when compared to a standard TV and most of them do not come with tuners in them. They are monitors only so you have to buy other components to use it.

    2) Tivo does not have it yet http://www.tivo.com/5.3.1.1.asp?article=195

    3) ReplayTV says they can out put to a HD ready TV but that is it.

    Another choice is to build a standard TV DVR box. You could get away a lot cheaper by getting a tuner card that does MPEG2 encoding and cutting back on CPU, power supply, memory etc... Then later upgrade it with PC parts that today are good but in 2 years are someone?s junk.

    Sample: 1.3ghz, MB, 256meg, costs less than $150 or get someone?s old desktop PC
    Tuner card: $50-150 depending on quality

    The standard open source choices are
    http://www.mythtv.org/
    with Knoppmyth making it easy
    http://mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    http://freevo.sourceforge.net/

    Some Pay options are
    http://www.freytechnologies.com/sagetv.html
    http

    1. Re:Other options by stedlj · · Score: 0

      Got chopped---
      http://www.snapstream.com/Products/Pro ducts_PVS3.a sp

  117. Privacy and Control by Phaid · · Score: 1

    The problem with ready-made solutions like TiVO is the lack of privacy and the lack of control. I don't want someone out there knowing what I watch, or being able to arbitrarily change the software running in my entertainment system.

    I'm building a MythTV-based box to do PVR, watch DVDs, etc. Yes, it winds up being more expensive than running out and buying a commercial PVR. But it offers the same capabilities without giving up control.

    (By "I am building" I mean that I have all of the software and supporting hardware installed on my desktop PC, and once I've gotten everything tweaked to my satisfaction I'll get a mini-ITX box and "deploy" it).

  118. My reason: control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't necessarily care about faster, smaller, and cheaper. There are other totally legit reasons to DIY. The main reason I'd build my own is that I want it the way I want it. I'm not sure if any commercial product does exactly what I want. What do I want? Here are some things:

    1. Hard drive. The ability to easily replace the hard drive. I have well over 300 CDs and have never been able to keep them organized. They are in random piles all over the top of the entertainment center cabinet, and it's impossible to find things. So, when I build my A/V PC, they are all going in there. I don't want some system that will fill up and not have room for expansion, thus causing me to have to trash the whole system and start over. And I don't even want something where I can replace the hard disk but I have to do it in some complicated, risky, undocumented procedure that voids my warranty.
    2. flac. I'm picky about my sound quality. I will not be converting my compact discs to MP3. I will be converting them to flac. This means I need more disk space, and it means I need a system that can use the codec I want, not the codecs that the manufacturer wants me to use.
    3. Future expandability for new formats. I don't have an HDTV right now and there is little HDTV programming available. But when it is, I want to upgrade my A/V PC to handle it. With some proprietary thing, the upgrade path will quite likely be something like "buy a new one". Also, what happens when the SACD (or -- God forbid -- DVD Audio) format takes over? I will need a new drive, a new D/A converter, and new software. But I don't need a whole new machine.
    4. I want to burn CDs. Since I plan to put my entire CD collection in the thing, I want to give it the ability to burn a copy of some of the music for a friend.
    5. Interoperation with the car. I am not certain I'm going to both (need a new car first), but I am toying with the idea of building an audio PC to put in the trunk of my car that keeps synchronized with the A/V PC via 802.11. Do any off-the-shelf systems do that?
    6. Network accessibility. I have a home office. I would like to be able to NFS mount or stream music from the A/V PC to my other PC or to my Macintosh. I also want to be able to ssh in and run little programs to manage things. I don't want to do all the maintenance from the couch using the crappy resolution of the TV as my only display.
    7. Backups. I intend to use the A/V PC to back up my other computers over the network at night. And I intend to use the other computers to back up the A/V PC. There's no way I'm going to build all that software, configure it, and then rip 300 CDs worth of stuff to flac and then not back it up. Sure, I can rebuild, but it would take me weeks or months to re-rip those CDs.
    8. D/A quality. Right now I have a modest enough stereo system that I bought for about $750 when I was in high school. It sounds fine, but not excellent. So a relatively cheap D/A (like that on a sound card) will do OK. But at some point in the next few years, I intend to upgrade the stereo (since I've had it since 1988...) to something a bit nicer. At that point, I may want to go with an audiophile-quality reclocking outboard D/A converter.
    9. Funky mixing stuff. If I decide to get really elaborate, and if the right open-source software is available, I may decide to ditch the receiver altogether and do all the audio processing, mixing, etc. on the PC. These days, because of home recording studios, you can easily buy high-quality multi-channel A-D converter boxes that I could for FM radio inputs, etc. So there is no reason I can't do all my processing, including volume control, equalization, and crossover (if I choose to bi-amp) right on the PC. And maybe I could write a clever filter that will nuke the boosted audio on commercials. :-)
  119. No Hardware encode/decode discussion by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1
    It seems like they overlooked some important decisions such as hardware encoding/decoding and software to use. They mention 2 windows pvr offerings at the end, (sageTV being one mentioned which you cannot use if you don't have a tv tuner card as it will not go through configuration).

    But I'd like to see more information about hardware encoding. I really would prefer hardware accelleration for my PVR. I'd like the review to include mythTV or other linux based solutions with maybe a table of what can do what. What can play dvd's. What can handle HDTV. What can support everything over optical audio out. What can handle music, (and lots of it. libraries in the 10's of 1000's and 100's of 1000's not just the 300 mp3's my dad downloaded). What can handle burning of recorded shows to dvd or VCD. What can handle media on other machines. And how well do different software solutions play with different hardware solutions. If I get an ATI all in wonder, an audigy 2, a Hauppauge hdtv tuner, a TDK DVD+-RW and throw mythtv on their is it all going to play nice together or is it going to be a disfunctional family christmas.

    --
    I do security
  120. That's 3 by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    You told me to prove you wrong. Which I did. Some of the biggest innovations in this century came from garage inventors... who in turn went on to become big corporations.. But STARTED due to innovations that EXISTING BIG COMPANIES missed.

    More proof?
    Palm Pilots. Both Microsoft and Apple brought to market several handheld devices that failed in the market. Even with millions in backing. It took ONE guy who sat down and worked out a proper design to develop the Palm Pilot.

    Okay, that's 3 companies that started from garages or from one individual.

    Now show me YOUR proof of "innovation" by big companies.

    1. Re:That's 3 by Sebastopol · · Score: 1


      Here's my proof:

      www.uspto.gov

      How many patents were filed by individual innovators, vs how many were filed by innovators working for big companies?

      I don't know exact numbers, but I'll wager there are literally millions of innovations under a corporate IP umbrella compared to the three that you named. I can assume this because it costs about $15-25k to file a patent, out of reach to all but a few individuals, but easy when the IP is owned by a company.

      In fact, all I have to do is walk down the aisle and look in the cubes, and there are a dozen people with multiple patent plaques on their walls. And this is one group of one division of one company in one sector.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:That's 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't measure innovation by counting patents. USPTO is infamous for ineffectual prior art searches and a comically useless definition of "novel and non-obvious". An organization relying on a patent portfolio has decided to ambush its competitors rather than outperform them--innovators have more useful things to do.

    3. Re:That's 3 by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      Unless you are Steve Jobs, I would suggest putting your ego aside and not trying to define what is innovative and what is mundane, from your elitist perspective.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    4. Re:That's 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The patent counts shows that they fast track and grease the skids for big corporations and they put the individual apps through the slow track. Patents don't measure innovation for many categories of technologies, products and processes.

      That autistic cattle woman made huge innovations in slaughterhouse design because of her personal understanding of livestock POV. Revolutionary, cost cutting designs that any corporation would be shouting about from never ending roadshows. But did she patent this stuff? Could she?

      It can also be argued that the most innovative ideas from within corporations are suppressed or rejected because they can't tolerate recurring obsolesce of their product lines, they can only tolerate incremental evolution in most cases.

      Can an individual create innovation in the fringes of an area like silicon wafer fabrication without several million dollars worth of equipment? No, probably not, but for instance, the problem of screw induced cavitation (highly and expensively studied by the US Navy) took a major leap forward because an individual came up with an innovative solution on his own.

      Patent counts have no relationship to true innovation.

  121. Flexibility of Linux in your living room by ptelligence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure you can buy a ready made solution, but what happens when the new tech comes out? Is it upgradeable? I had a spare box sitting around, threw Linux on it, got a $10 GeForce2 with TV-out off of eBay and made a pretty damn cool digital movie player that I can ssh into and sftp movies to and from. Not only that, but I can run picture slideshows or fire up Mozilla and hit Bit Torrent sites on a 27 inch TV. I haven't messed with MythTV or Freevo yet. I'm looking to get a WinTV PVR card and set up HD recording, but my drive is only 20 gig (It's what I had laying around)

    It's a great solution. My girlfriend and I watch tons of movies on it every weekend. We usually have 5 or 6 downloads going at the same time. I know its expandable for new formats and new means of acquiring media. Plus it never crashes ;) It's Linux! I'm now looking to upgrade the CPU because the movies are getting bigger and putting strain on my AMD 500. I fear that if I went with a proprietary solution, I'd be locked in. With this, I can build a cool case and keep upgrading here and there as I desire. I highly recommend it as a cool project that can be done at a very low cost.

    Sig? No thanks man, I'm tring to quit.

  122. Not in my closet I don't by fendel · · Score: 1

    I don't have a Radeon AIW 9600 or a 3Ghz processor gathering dust in my closet. I have a Voodoo Banshee card and a 300mhz Celeron in there.

    Does anybody really have top-of-the-line parts just sitting around as spare parts?

  123. Geeks typically have parts lying around by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I'm building a MythTV box right now out of crap that I'm not using in my closet. For the cost of a couple of capture cards on ebay ($100-150), I'm gonna build a TiVo.

    There is no way in hell you can buy a TiVo with guide info for that price, but you're right, if I had to build from scratch, of course it would be cheaper to just go buy a TiVo. But most geeks have access to old computer parts.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  124. You don't need top of the line by lorcha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get a video capture card with onboard MPEG-2 encoding and you could build a MythTV box with a Pentium I ($130 for a Hauppauge-250 on ebay). Or better yet, get a video capture card with onboard MPEG-2 encoding and decoding ($180 for a Hauppauge-350 on ebay).

    Still think you don't have the spare parts lying around? You don't need much CPU power or RAM (256MB is plenty) if all the encoding/decoding is on the capture card. Grab a PCI IDE controller for $10 and a 200GB drive (I've seen 'em as cheap as $100) and yer' set.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  125. One Reason: HDJJNS by dbretton · · Score: 1

    High Definition Janet Jackson Nipple Shot!

    Do you *need* any other reasons?

  126. Re: Have a look at this: Media Ready 4000 by anandrajan · · Score: 1

    Any discoveries on the MSRP of the Telly unit? I do know the MR4000 was expected to be in the USD 400 price range.

    You can buy the Telly MC 800 for about $750 but that's with 256MB of memory. Actually, you can configure everything directly on their website. I'm holding off until they include a DVD +RW because I have a small kid and would like to archive his videos in a convenient form.

    --
    Anand Rangarajan anand@cise.ufl.edu
  127. let's compare sizes by putch · · Score: 1

    I've had this project going for a while. I started with an old p3-600 and 256mb of ram. and 200gb of hd space. and was just for dvd's and downloaded media.

    since then i've upgraded to this:
    winxp pro (not media center)
    1.6ghz p4
    1gb pc2700
    2x80gb hd in raid 0 + 40gb
    geforce 2 w/ tv tuner and s-video out
    winTV PVR 250
    sblaster live hooked up to home theater w/surround
    bluetooth keyboard
    dvd-r drive

    it's set up with a dual display, one a 17" monitor by the couch, for chatting, surfing. and the video signal goes to the 27" tv across the room.

    i can *tivo* shows with the wintv card. and wathch another channel with the geforce tuner. all while i download tv/movies/music from my p2p of choice. and i can stream almost all media across the network.

    AND i can log in from work (or my favorite wifi hotsopt--the local bar--with my pda) with remote desktop to schedule a record or download something. so that it'll be ready for when i return home.

    is it the cheapest solution? no. but it's FAR more versatile than anything at best buy. not that much more expensive. especially since i built it piecemeal overtime, from largely scavenged parts, supports ALL video formats, with a little tweaking an has nearly unlimited upgradability. also it wows all of the women who come over. it's the complete series of ds9 that makes them all wet.

    it's not the easiest solution. it's caused alot of headaches. but it's been fun, and it's doing great these days.

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  128. why htpc? by toni · · Score: 1

    I have a normal AthlonXp 1900+ system in my "computer room" running W2k along with another, slower machine running OpenBSD 3.4-Current. I have a 10-meter long s-video cable and stereo audio cable going over to my living room, where they plug into my 6.1 surround stereo system and 32" widescreen TV. I have a wireless keyboard and mouse. what the heck would I do with a "htpc" ?

  129. but how to get decent video out by captaineo · · Score: 1

    IMHO *the* issue with building a HTPC is how to get a decent video signal out of it. Video will almost always look better on an NTSC or HD television than a computer monitor. Computer monitors have a sharp response function that is tuned for single-pixel desktop graphics, not continuous video signals. This is why DVDs that look great on a TV often look crummy on a computer display.

    Consumer graphics cards with "Video Out" are not acceptable because there is not a one-to-one mapping between VGA pixels and video samples. Nor is there any guaranteed synchronization to the video scan rate.

    I consider a hardware video codec with a true *video* (digital, component or S-video) output essential for any PC to drive a television.

  130. We students... by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    Another reason people build a HTPC is b/c, like me, they may be grad/students, living in a small room with space enough for a bed, a workstation, and bookshelf. As such, I turned my PC into something of mini-HTPC: 21" LCD display, Radeon AiW 9800 Pro, SB Audigy 2 ZS, and Logitech Z680 5.1 speakers. Granted the screen isn't theatre-size, but the sound is, and the convenience of using my workstation to work with during the week and then entertaining my gf with it on the weekend is quite nice. So don't forget students in your lists of why people make HTPCs.

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  131. The pure "hack value" of it by swmccracken · · Score: 1

    Why? Simple. The pure value of simply hacking something together.

    Hack Value.

    "As Louis Armstrong once said when asked to explain jazz: "Man, if you gotta ask you'll never know." (Feminists please note Fats Waller's explanation of rhythm: "Lady, if you got to ask, you ain't got it.")"

  132. Lifetime Subscriptions Available... by dbretton · · Score: 1

    Tivo also offers lifetime subscriptions.

    nuff said

    1. Re:Lifetime Subscriptions Available... by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is if anything happens to your Tivo, you're SOL, as your subscription won't transfer.

  133. I dunno by Cyno · · Score: 1
    • Costs less than a home theatre?
    • Doesn't have Macrovision
    • No commercials
    • No flashing 12:00
    • Looks cool
    • Saves me time

  134. don't forget by tacokill · · Score: 1

    streaming radio (ie: Shoutcast)
    streaming video
    ripping DVD's or CD's

  135. Re: Have a look at this: Media Ready 4000 by w3svc_animal · · Score: 1
    IF it's network enabled (ethernet or wireless...) you could always copy the file across your home network to a pc with a DVD +RW

    although I do have to admit, it somewhat defeats the purpose of an "all-in-one" piece of equip...

    --

    Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

  136. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by calica · · Score: 1

    The kitcar market is actually pretty large. Plenty of ferrari kits for Fieros and Hummer for trucks.

    There is also a very large kitplane industry. Everything from plans to every part for biplanes to jets.

  137. dloads by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1

    i have over 100 gigs of anime. over 50 gigs of feature films and over 20 gigs of star trek episodes and movies.

    howd i get em?
    download.
    theres my reason

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
  138. Upsampling DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you purchase a HDTV today that doesn't upsample a 480P signal to 1080i or 1080p, then you've been ripped off.

    You don't need a PC to do it.

  139. Just Wondering by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    If I can get a discount card to shop where all of you /. technogeeks shop? Everytime something comes up that involves custom hardware solutions (much like this topic) I see countless people saying, "well I could build that for a hundred bucks or less...." or "prices on those have dropped to $30", but usually when I start to price the stuff....It is more realistic to what I originally thought costwise. Sure I could get a big old ugly ATX case with the sound of a screeching 747 and a 40 gig hardrive and celeron for $100-200...But in reality...to do something like this "the right way" would require a super small and asthetic case and mini board. You can bare bones that for about $200-$300 and then add another $100 for the CPU. Then you need a big and fast HD for about $100. A good recordable DVD for about $100. MPEG hardware encoders to do the PVR stuff are about $150. So in reality you are at least $600-$700 to have a start. Yet always some /.'s say that...."yea, I can do that for $100" and have money left over for pizza and beer.

    I wonder how? Or am I the only one that has not figured out the /. math that comes from estimates based on people who are not actually buying the hardware....only estimating what they think something should cost.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:Just Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pricewatch and Bizrate are good "street price" databases, and many of us are fortunate enough to live near the kind of screwdriver shop that can offer those prices (helps if management is Asian and has personal connections with export wholesalers). And you don't need hardware MPEG and a mini-ITX case, just paint a desktop ATX case matte black (mine is the same width as my standalone DVD player, just twice as tall) and use a midrange Athlon to do software encoding from a commodity Brooktree tuner. Even the parts for a LIRC remote control receiver are dirt cheap, if you can solder or wire-wrap.

      Admittedly all this is more affordable if you have spare parts to use, as many geeks do.

  140. Notice the "non-infringing use" of 'piracy tools'? by rbrander · · Score: 1

    Nobody has mentioned a thing I liked in the article. He points out in some detail that there are tricks requiring decryption of a DVD - I assume he's talking DeCSS that even most commercial products can't do, or don't do.

    This is a terrific anti-DMCA argument, in the legal, not just moral, sense.

    The Supremes let stand the existence of the VCR, that noted Boston Strangler of movie revenues, because of a single non-infringing use of recording: time shifting.

    And here's this article mentions just in passing that a HTPC, using "piracy tools", can give the customer a fuller value out of his DVD purchase than anything available affordably that decodes the DVD legally. (And, "affordably" is important; Hollywood had no beef with the existence of $6000 studio VCRs).

    The Johansen argument ("I wanted to watch it on my Linux box") wasn't convincing to a Windows person who'd never heard of Linux. Affordable solutions for "what can I do with this DVD" were available in the form of Windows and Mac software and for that matter $89 Sony players. The law need have no sympathy for Johansen wanting to see it on yet another platform.

    But if I understood the article correctly, you can't get some of those very visible upsampling improvement features - an obvious real consumer benefit - ANY OTHER WAY than a PC using "piracy" tools.

    And there's your one non-infringing use.

  141. HTPC rocks for high end by the+ed+menace · · Score: 1

    I run my computer to a 12' diagonal rear projection screen, using a Digital Projections DLP projector. For computer work it is readable with all lights on, and uses my far focus eyesight rather than near focus, which helps with eyestrain.

    I used to run a noisy PC in the equipment room, but I then I found:

    1) You can build a fanless PC (I used Signum Data components and modified them with more heat pipes... next step is to use the Zalman monster case.)

    2) It is easier to run a long (with repeater) DVI cable for the projector than it was to run a long run Firewire for the DVD. In both cases you run USB2 repeater -- either for peripherals or the sound box.

    It is amazing for videogames and DVDs, although the DVD quality is slightly lower than a dedicated high end system (Meridian DVD + Snell & Wilcox interpolator). But the HTPC is LESS expensive and more versatile.

  142. Modded Xbox by olman · · Score: 1

    Xbox does pretty much everything you'd want from a Media PC. Plus it's dirt cheap, AC3 and widescreen works without pain, you can play games and it looks like it belongs to your AV pile.

  143. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by unitron · · Score: 1
    "Because I just ain't average enough for the prebuilt stuff"

    Now that you've written it, put it in your sig file.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  144. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by chaotica1974 · · Score: 1

    Kit kars are one thing, mostly the exterior. Guess I was thinking of someone fabricating everything from the frame to the paint :doh!:

  145. Hack Value by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    Haven't you guys heard of the concept of "hack
    value"? Some people just like to do it themselves
    to figure out how things work in more detail than
    the ordinary point-and-drool kind of customer.

  146. been there, done that... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    In my younger time, I had a top of the line Nvidia TNT2 Ultra the one with the fastest memory and the only one with tv out...made my wallet cry at the time, it was just out...) and a glorious PII350 (actually converted as firewall) with an additional MPEG Decoder card and...ahem...Win98...

    Being just out of student stripend and just into "my money, my pleasures" I had the pleasure of watching dvds, vcds, svcds, Divxs and Anime in the main room

    The pc was in the chamber, input was done with a wireless Logitech keyboard/mouse and the 9 feet emission limit over-ruled by 2* 5 meters PS/2 connectors...

    It was a perfect solution, except for th 98 part..

    Are you all telling me that what I could do quite easily some years ago with 98 is much more difficult to get at today ?

    Think about investing into a long svhs cable and long audio cords, plug them into your tv/vcr/home Theater/whatever and you will be up and running in no time.

    Also, if you want to do it faster, just use the good for nothing, average in everything Win2000...
    It is actually easier than a linux solution...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:been there, done that... by dasunt · · Score: 1

      My TV is about 40ft away from the computer...

    2. Re:been there, done that... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

      40 ft is about 12 meters I think, and you can get good svhs cables up to 20-25 meters. 15 meters svhs should be around 25-30 Euros... don't know where you live, got mine in the Paris computer area at a guy doing only cables, cartriges and small components...

      svhs has a lot less loss than YUV/RGB, so you can find a long enough svhs cable and a "peritel" converter to stick to your tv.

      Sound can be plugged into tv the same way using long low grade audio cable or go to your hi-fi or whatever...

      That's how I did mine on a tight budget...and your TV doesn't need a Top-of-the-line signal...

      Also the 10 meters PS/2 cords for the wireless logitech can be reduced to only one cable using the laptop bi-connectors for PS/2.

      tell me when you are finished 8)

      --
      It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  147. Any one tried with PDI Deluxe + Realmagic Xcard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody claim that this combo would improve the quanity a lot(Working with DScaler,blah blah). Any one tried with it? Did it really better?

  148. DVI (without DRM)! by claud9999 · · Score: 1

    Why hasn't anyone pointed out the obvious? DVI without the DRM is prettymuch only available to computers. Prosumer DVI-out DVD players do DRM. (Well, unless you're willing to risk a bizarre brand.)

    Also, I use a Creative SoundBlaster USB. Why? External D->A means higher S/N. It works ok with my Powerbook, although the PB can't control much of anything on it.

    I use a Powerbook 'cause it's damned quiet, much quieter than most PC's and 'cause I can use it for so much more than my home theater.

    A $75 free-standing projector screen and some Martin-Logan electrostats make everything all nummy.