Slashdot Mirror


Thirty-Three States Contributed to the MATRIX

lexbaby writes "The Salt Lake Tribune has an article claiming that at least 33 states have released government and commercial records on residents to the controversial MATRIX (Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange) network instead of the originally claimed 13." Don't worry, there's plenty of RAM for all 50 and the territories too.

328 comments

  1. Avoiding trouble in the first place... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    With this in mind, here are tips to help you avoid being labeled a terrorist:

    Mouth shut, eyes forward, do what you're told. Don't question authority.

    Smile for the cameras. They're everywhere and they're watching you.

    Secure all zippers, buttons, tie clips, etc. Wardrobe Malfunction isn't funny anymore, it's subversive.

    Turn in your neighbors on the slightest hint they're trouble makers. You won't get a pair a blue jeans, but you help keep your country safe.

    Pokemon: Catch 'em all, otherwise you never know where they are or what they are up to.

    Cover your mouth when coughing or sneezing to avoid Germ Warfare Terrorist label.

    Vote for the most patriotic sounding politician, no matter what their platform.

    Remember, we're all in this together.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by machine+of+god · · Score: 3, Funny
      you forgot:

      Always wear your foil hat underneath a real hat, otherwise they'll know you know.

    2. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "pay attention to your personal hygene."

    3. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by GPLDAN · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mod this post up. McCarthy would be spooging himself if he were alive today.

    4. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by maximilln · · Score: 1, Insightful

      -----
      Secure all zippers, buttons, tie clips, etc. Wardrobe Malfunction isn't funny anymore, it's subversive
      -----
      Amen to that. I have this old leather jacket from Wilson's that I bought nearly ten years ago. It was a $300 lambskin leather jacket at the time. Now it's been through enough rainstorms to make it look like a $5 Salvation Army pickup even though I kept it well oiled and water protected. Anyways, the threads holding the zipper onto the left breast pocket were snapped from keeping my cigarettes in there and reaching in to retrieve them, straining the threads over a number of years. I had to be extra careful unzipping the pocket because, if I led the zipper too far, it would slide right off the end of the track.

      I went through the airport a few months back with my jacket. When they searched my jacket at the checkpoint they unzipped the pocket. They weren't kind enough to put the zipper inside the pocket so that I could reattach it. They threw it away. I didn't think to check until I was in the terminal. I went back and asked about it but received nothing but blank stares and,"We can give you a claim form to fill out."

      Right. I'm going to spend 15 minutes filling out a claim form to have my name added to a list over a $2 zipper that I'll probably never be able to find the original match for anyways.

      I guess it's just part of life. No matter how well you take care of your stuff someone else is eventually going to break it for you and there's nothing that you can do about it.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    5. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Dalcius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      WAR IS PEACE
      FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
      IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

      Please board the nearest transportation to the Ministry of Love, they are waiting to see you.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    6. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is alive, as long as there are people acting like him.

    7. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Mod this post up. McCarthy would be spooging himself if he were alive today.

      IIRC, McCarthy's quest began by seeking special treatment by the U.S. Army for Pvt G. David Schine, a former aide to Roy Cohn, friend and ally of McCarthy. McCarthy's list ("I have in my hand a list...") was BS, but once the lying for favoritism got going it was hard to stop and took on a life of it's own, alledging the Army was full of communist sympathisers because they refused special treatment to Schine. Pretty ugly, but today isn't quite that bad, yet.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought one from Wilson's years ago, too. Good leather, but the rest was cheap chinese junk. Try a shoe or leather goods store. A local one was able to fix up mine when it fell apart.

    9. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by GPLDAN · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well that's the wonderful thing about incredible amounts of data mining software and huge databases. You can make it that bad at much faster rate. Entire periods of historical precendent collapse under a compressed timeline. A single President can implement a police state and revoke 100 years of case law regarding privacy with a single sweep of the mouse, all in one term.

    10. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Secure all zippers, buttons, tie clips, etc. Wardrobe Malfunction isn't funny anymore, it's subversive.

      This is something I hardly even shrugged at, while most ultraconservatives get their panties all in a knot (apparently *that* isn't a wardrobe malfunction) and get all freaked out. For what? A part of the female anatomy, and it wasn't even completely naked.
      Violent videogames and movies, and owning a gun, and brainwash kids into believing fairytales; all these things are considered ok. But a woman not wearing her burkha or otherwise covering her entire body, that's surely an omen that Satan is coming to town. Amazing. You know, I think it was in London that Victoria Silvstedt (she was in Playboy) accidentally had her dress slip a little so her breast came into view. I've seen one (1) notice of this in the online media over here. Where are the upset people? Where is Satan, surely this was his work? Or perhaps it was the liberals...

    11. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember, we're all in this together.

      The inherent sarcasm in the tone of your post is downright un-American. Nobody is forcing you to stay in America if you don't like it. America, love it or leave it fscker.

    12. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Newspeak: the one and only language whose vocabulary decreases every year.

      "You must not just obey Big Brother, you must love Big Brother"

      "We are aiming at destroying the family unit. All love will be directed towards Big Brother"

      "Procreation will be nothing more than an annual ritual"

      Again, all from 1984

    13. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      They don't have to *see* the tinfoil hat; there are tinfoil detectors everywhere. Fortunately Saran Wrap sheilds against tinfoil detection rays.

    14. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tin foil hat?...humbug! I'm getting a tin foil tent.(half way down page)

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You probably meant...

      America, love it or destroy it with freedomcrushing practices such as PATRIOT Act, big government, big brother mentality, etc.

      Seriously, if you love freedom, you strive to protect it; not from King George, not from Ivan, because you did that already. Don't forget to defend your freedom no matter the threat. If your president and attorney general is the threat, you know what you have to do. You have no excuse.

    16. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Always wear your foil hat underneath a real hat, otherwise they'll know you know.

      Good point. Thank you very much.

      "Good manners aren't just a good idea, they're the law!"

      "You're under arrest."
      "What for?"
      "You didn't thank him."
      "Oh, sorry."
      "Too late for that, Sir."
      "Very well, thank you for arresting me."
      "You're welcome."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    17. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

      The scary part is, that the parent is modded "Insightful", not "Funny".

    18. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the REAL scary part is that it IS both insightful and funny (in a dark humour kinda way)

    19. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am not trying to say that the US is in any way close to the country described in '1984', but certain people in our government have *always* pushed for some very close parallels and it's creepy whenever they surface.

      I can only hope that the upcoming generation has been taught enough independence to value their freedom and fight the authoritarians. The good thing about a democratic society is that the pendulum swings both ways, and given time usually corrects itself. The current voters (baby boomers) didn't deal with as much McCarthyism as their parents and their apathy is going to get us in trouble.

      Hopefully it will correct itself as it often has.

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    20. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by qtp · · Score: 1

      It would be more scary if the humor was recognised but the insight was not.

      --
      Read, L
    21. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've got a better one.

      Keep a record of everything you do. Every dollar you spend, every phone call you make, and every trip you take. Upon being asked if you are a terrorist, make relevant portions of this record avaliable.

      Orwellian society exists due to lies and secrecy. Truth, fact, and honesty are the only proof against it.

    22. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, what he forgot is the fact that about 2,000 people died on 9/11, while 300,000 die every year due to obesity.

      Oh, that and the fact that that they are willing to destroy our rights over the first one, and do little to nothing about the second.

      Politicians make me sick.

    23. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by ciggieposeur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Damn, I lost my chance to moderate just to say:

      "Fuck you."

      Nobody is forcing you to stay in America if you don't like it. America, love it or leave it fscker.

      You want to pay for my moving expenses? You want to lobby a foreign government on my behalf to grant me a visa to stay in that country?

      No? Well OK then, go shut the fuck up.

      There's LOTS of people forcing me to stay in America: my creditors, American politicians, foreign politicians, my parents, my wife's family, better-educated-than-American European citizens, poor foreign workers who don't want me to have one of the few jobs in their neck of the world. You Mr Anonymous Coward are a nitwitted dumbass who obviously has had no direct contract with foreign cultures if you think any old middle-class American family with a beef against the government can just pick up and leave. Shit I can't even get into Mexico to work at a sweatshop.

      Let me also point out the American idea that we vote for our own government misleaders, hence the government is "by the people, for the people". When you defend a totalitarian government, you point out to the entire world that you don't know shit from squat about the idealistic American Dream, and that it's YOU who don't belong here. If you had given any clue that you knew what the hell you were talking about you might have appeared to be one of the minority of Americans who know the actual brutal history of the country and the struggle of its people to create a real democracy despite the government. But you're obviously not one of those people, so again Fuck You for being a dumbass who believes in the thin blue line and will vote for the creation of a despotism in the land *I* call home.

      YOU are the non-American here, and your First Amendment right to ignorant speech ends at my property line in rural Texas. Actually not too far from the place a few ATF agents upholding a corrupt regime got their lives terminated in self-defense by some religious nuts in 1993.

      Do you Mr Anonymous Coward want me to leave America? I invite you to try and kick me out. You'll need lots of bullets.

    24. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, it's possible that the WMD were there in Iraq. The massive dossiers that Saddam & co. kept on all its people.

    25. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Procreation will be nothing more than an annual ritual"

      ONLY ONCE A YEAR????

      Come to think of it, it might be an improvement on my current conditions...

      --
      No sig
    26. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq...

      Weapons of Mass (Political) Destruction for Bush, Rumsfeld and their cronies: Records pretaining to the US assistance in Iraq's chemical warfare programs in the 1980's for use against Iran (who we really didn't like at the time and still aren't too fond of).

      The present Administration is interested in sweeping under the rug the support we gave to bin Laden and the Taliban when they were fighting the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the same timeframe as well.

      Expect one of the following as the election approaches:

      • we "discover" chemical or biological weapons in Iraq in sizable quantities, but the story of how we "missed" them for so long falls apart under close examination because they were in fact recently panted there...
      • We "capture" bin Laden but he's prevented from makng any public statement under the guise of preventing him from giving "instructions" to his followers... despite the fact that none of the previous communiques (aired unedited by foreign news services) turned out to seem to contain any such. This will conveniently prevent him from explaining that he was captured long prior and held on ice for political reasons, conveniently.
    27. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      What did Comic Book Guy say, "For most of you this will mean much less breading. For me: much, much more!"

    28. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot the warhammer 40k nut...well apart from me for knowing the quote is from there...unless it is stolen from somewhere else.

    29. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by kwandar · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I'd like to thank you for saying what I as a foreigner could not say, to the "nitwitted dumbass"!!

    30. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nobody is forcing you to stay in America if you don't like it. America, love it or leave it fscker.


      If you don't like it, leave? I thought the American way was: if you don't like it, start a revolution.
    31. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by marcovje · · Score: 1


      And when in doubt, read Orwell's 1984 for more pointers.

    32. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Grrr · · Score: 1

      Nobody is forcing you to stay in America if you don't like it. America, love it or leave it fscker.

      Gotta be troll-satire. But once again, for the folks in back...

      Anyone who doesn't desire the improvement of what they "love", doesn't love it very much after all. If your daughter took up prostitution, you'd probably seek an option other than "love her" or "leave her".

      "Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right." - Carl Schurz

      <grrr>

    33. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      Well the cowardly pilgrims didn't follow that mentality.

    34. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Hey, I remember a guy who didn't like America. He went to another country whose values he did espouse and joined in their quest to consolidate their power and more completely form the state that he envisioned. And then the US invaded that country and brought him back. Just goes to show, you gotta fight your battles at home, I suppose, because even if you leave, they'll bring you back.

      *In no way do I espouse the tenets of fundamentalist Islam or do I endorse the human rights violations of the Taliban (or the Northern Alliance, for that matter).

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    35. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's a sad state of affairs here that it is moderated (Score:5, Insightful). Truly, truly sad. While the GPP (GrandParentPost) is insightful (in an indirect way) and was intended to be 'Funny', what it more insightful is how the moderators are behaving.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    36. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      According to this article, the most recent death toll is 2,749. Closer to 3,000 than 2,000. Just a nitpick, of course; your original point is still valid.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    37. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Keep a record of everything you do. Every dollar you spend, every phone call you make, and every trip you take. Upon being asked if you are a terrorist, make relevant portions of this record avaliable."

      They will already have that record and if they decide that they don't like you they'll use selected excerpts from it to "prove" that you are a "terrorist".*

      *They get to define the meanings of "prove" and "terrorist".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    38. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Planesdragon · · Score: 0

      You've almost got the point. "They" already have a record of you that's enough to conclude that you're a terrorist--if they didn't, they wouldn't care about you.

      The point of having a personal, complete record is so that you can take the parts that they didn't release to the court and give much-needed context.

      And who are "they", again? The UN black-helicopter attack squad? Or maybe you're referring to the Office of Homeland Security (and similar federal executive agencies, like the FBI, CIA, and US military.) I know that's the only "they" that *I* really care if they think I'm a terrorist or not.

      Homeland Security may be a bunch of inept, misguided, badly directed thugs--I don't think they are, but they "may be"--but if they are, they're thugs who want the chance to bust the heads of real, genuine threats. If you can prove to them easily that you're NOT a threat, they'll let you go on your way and look for someone they can smack around with no bad press.

      Oh, and if it's a "complete record," then it's a complete record--and that means multiple redunant backups, including one easy at hand to give over to satisfy a theoretical subpoena and at least one off-site in a standard data vault and one in the office of your lawyer. And it means noting when and by whom you were asked if you were a terrorist.

      OTOH, let's think about the two possibilities that you seem to be encouraging.

      1: We don't keep records, and we treat the misguided thugs as "the enemy." This makes them look at us and follow us, and exposes us to a higher risk of miscarraiges of justice.

      2: The government really is a Theocratic Heiarchy to Extinguish You. Why the @#$@! are you still in the country, then? Build a boat, learn to fish, and LEAVE. Hundreds of thousands of people live off the radar of the Federal government by not being in or ever coming in contact with this country.

    39. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Theocratic Hierarchy to Extinguish You"

      Excellent :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    40. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the British way.

    41. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mouth shut, eyes forward, do what you're told. Don't question authority. I know you post is kind of meant to be funny, but the day we stop questioning authority, is the day we will loose all rights we have.

    42. Re:Avoiding trouble in the first place... by dreemkill · · Score: 1

      ive always hated that "arguement" of "if you dont like it, leave".

      i was born to two people, on the planet earth. they happened to live on this continent of the world.
      i was born to a family on a planet, not to a government.

      its not the country i despise, its the government that ruins it that i despise.

      --
      dreemkill.
  2. Oh, that by Gherald · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought they were opening a new terawatt plant or something.

  3. Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Welcome to The Matrix.

    1. Re:Obligatory comment by bonch · · Score: 1

      Cue the bad Matrix jokes. "Here they come..."

    2. Re:Obligatory comment by General+Fault · · Score: 1
      (Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange)


      Wouldn't that be MATIE?

      --
      No man is an island... But I wouldn't mind having a bigger moat.
    3. Re:Obligatory comment by myyrk · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange)

      Wouldn't that be MATIE?


      No, because then they would be confused with the pirate non dairy creamer COFFEE MATIE.

    4. Re:Obligatory comment by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      Arrrgghh matie, those scallywags foiled us again.

    5. Re:Obligatory comment by hsidhu · · Score: 1

      NO really,

      Now the Matrix REALLY has you.

  4. suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was wondering why all the stories aimed at getting the tinfoil hat crowd in a frenzy where popping up, then I noticed Michael was at the helm

    1. Re:suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've had a cou;ple of malt beverages at lunch. im feeling fine thank yuo very much!@@

  5. list please! by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there are numbers but not a list!

    we need a list! if my state was involved I would like to know!

    --

    Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
    1. Re:list please! by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here is a link to the MATRIX, apparently they don't update their website information much..

      CLICKY HERE

      http://www.matrix-at.org/states.htm

      Here is the Wired article that was posted here a day or two ago, which has more info on which states are involved...

      CLICKY HERE http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,62564,00. html?tw=wn_tophead_1

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    2. Re:list please! by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's good... it gives the starting 13, but what about the other 33?

      --

      Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
    3. Re:list please! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      I don't CA listed anywhere but with Ahhhnold at the helm its only a matter of time. We should rally all just unite and buy an island in the South Pacific somewhere, set up a data Haven.I really sick of Ashcroft and his cronies continuing efforts to get all up in my shit.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:list please! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      we need a list! if my state was involved I would like to know!

      Why? Are you a terrorist? It's not like you can do anything about it anyway so just shutup about it and do what you're told.

    5. Re:list please! by RLW · · Score: 1

      Is there a list anywhere describing which states submit data and what that data is ?

    6. Re:list please! by defender57 · · Score: 0

      Please make note that Wisconsin has now backed out of this, at least to my knowledge which may at times be sketchy.

    7. Re:list please! by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Interesting... but I can't find the page where you can update/view your neighbours records. =

    8. Re:list please! by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although this isn't terribly specific, this page gives a good general idea of what is and isn't in the datebase.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    9. Re:list please! by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think this site needs badly to be slashdotted or DoS'd.

      It needs to be "Google Bombed" too. We should all start providing links to it with the phrase "The MATRIX has you" everywhere we can.

      Yes, I really said this and when the feds come to ask me about it I'll tell th... wait a minute, there's someone at the door.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    10. Re:list please! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      We don't need to flee our country - it's plenty strong in spite of the corruption. Just don't let your friends and family vote for Bush in November, no matter how happy and ignorant they might seem about his tyranny. It's not enough, but it's a start. Trying Rove and his network of henchmen for treason, and hanging the traitors would go a long way, but not until we get Bush out of our hair.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  6. Wow by dupper · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't believe they actually had the balls to call it that.

    1. Re:Wow by astrashe · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was exactly my reaction -- I can't believe they'd call it that. You can sort of imagine them sitting around a table, and making a toast "to evil."

      I wonder if those guys model themselves on agent smith -- try to look like him, imitate his mannerisms, setc.

      You'd think they'd call it something like "children's protection and technological development project" instead.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. Welcome to the wonderful world of publicity-style naming.

      In government, you find projects with 'cool' names or names that noone would ever think to move against for fear of being ostracised (MATRIX, USA PATRIOT Act).

      In business, it's all about finding a comftorable two-syllable word that flows off the tounge. Or picking a common word and modifying it slightly.

    3. Re:Wow by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 1

      Compared to our current choices, Cthulu may be the lesser evil!

    4. Re:Wow by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

      I wonder if those guys model themselves on agent smith -- try to look like him, imitate his mannerisms, setc.

      I'm sure they have nothing better to do than worry about how they're dressed.

    5. Re:Wow by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Remember the FBI dress code? They do indeed worry endless how they look.

    6. Re:Wow by Zareste · · Score: 1

      Any day now you'll see Americans jumping barbed-wire fences, breaking for Mexico to escape tyranny.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    7. Re:Wow by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Could be worse, they could be an electronics company named Skynet

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    8. Re:Wow by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Heh. Brings a new meaning to...

      The Matrix has you :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  7. Take the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    burnt umber pill.

  8. Obligatory Morpheus Quote by Ann+Coulter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "The Matrix has you." Sad really.

    1. Re:Obligatory Morpheus Quote by warlockgs · · Score: 1

      I've known that this was coming but they didn't announce it on their website. Is the MATRIX online already? I thought they were still doing recon..

    2. Re:Obligatory Morpheus Quote by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's more sad: That quote, or the fact that someone quoted it.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    3. Re:Obligatory Morpheus Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So I clicked you link and checked it out and the first thing that caught my eye was the hacker ability tree link in the middle part of the page. My first thought was 'BWHAHAHAHAHAHA'. Or something like that.

      Having 'hacking' and whatnot be an integral theme is going to make that game fun for the script kiddies. I give it 9 months of server time before they close it down.

  9. Genealogical data too? by robslimo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the Mormons keeping track of their ancestors and all, do you suppose that some (most?) of the info that Utah willingly provided was from those vast genealogical records?

    I wonder if/how that would help the MATRIX project. Hmm.

    1. Re:Genealogical data too? by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mormon's are the only ones to do geneology. Thanks to some Scottish monk's I can trace one branch of my maternal family tree all the way back to a second century AD Roman general stationed in a garison behind Hadrians wall. I also know most of my paternal tree back eight generations.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Genealogical data too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes- we all know that looking at lists of dead people's names is paramount to preventing a terrorist attack. Retard.

    3. Re:Genealogical data too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like they keep it very secret or anything. The entire database is searchable online already.

    4. Re:Genealogical data too? by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Yes- we all know that looking at lists of dead people's names is paramount to preventing a terrorist attack. Retard.

      Did you notice where I said "if/how"?

      For instance, they could cross reference familial relationships and their past organizational associations to you and your immediate kin. What's wrong with your cognitive level?.

    5. Re:Genealogical data too? by Hentai · · Score: 1

      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.

      Regarding your .sig [and on-topic with the original post]: I've tried to explain what's wrong to everyone I know, occasionally going so far as to solicit people on the street. All that's done is piss people off, label me 'unpatriotic', and generally made things publically. uncomfortable. I've voted every time a candidate or position has come available that I believe in, yet somehow the popular opinion is completely ignored - my state has passed medical marijuana laws that its own police force refuses to honor, for example. I am routinely refused access to jury duty [of the 3 times I've been called in the past 11 years] because I show too much tendency to actually think about the issues, and not just be swayed by the lawyers' emotional arguments. How long should I keep trying before armed revolt is viable?

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    6. Re:Genealogical data too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the Matrix has you too.

  10. Before reading the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this was about the Matrix movie. Thirty three states involved in the making of the Matrix?

  11. Fear Sells. by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Once this MATRIX is proven to be useless, either by failing to catch terrorists or not predicting the next attack, will the government kill the program? Of course not.

    Fear has always been a great method to let government erode privacy and rights.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Fear Sells. by warlockgs · · Score: 1

      No of course they won't kill it. They'll just go back to the source, or unleash the squiddie sentinels. Either way, if you own a hovercraft, I'd be watching out if I were you.

    2. Re:Fear Sells. by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 5, Funny

      People hate terrorists. Let's make a list.

      People hate child molestors. Let's make a list.

      People hate corrupt politicians. Shhhhhh.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    3. Re:Fear Sells. by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hypothetically, though, what happens if it does contribute to blocking a terrorist attack?

      Would you change your mind about it?

      Would you rather have a few hundred people dead or have a little information stored about you in a database?

      Just playing devil's advocate here.

    4. Re:Fear Sells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Would you change your mind about it?"

      i sure wouldnt... the nazis were perfectly safe against attack until they started making attacks themselves.

      i would much rather see the US made a safer place via sensical foriegn policy than through draconian laws and cloak & dagger espionage.

      all these "security" measures are doing is simply allowing the US citizens to pay the price for our leaderships short-sightedness while allowing it to continue.

    5. Re:Fear Sells. by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This will sound cold, but I'd take the few hundred people dead.

      I don't believe we should surrender our civil liberties just because there are people out there willing to kill us. There have ALWAYS been people out there willing to kill us.

      French (French & Indian War)
      English (American Revolution, War of 1812)
      Ourselves (U.S. Civil War)
      Japanese (World War II)

      Why, now, is it okay to abuse our civil liberties?

      --
      CT

    6. Re:Fear Sells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      monkey box x 1
      Retard x 2

      -1, Drooling Moron.

    7. Re:Fear Sells. by jeni+generic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The MATRIX could have a hand in stopping a couple incidents but watching our own citizens and keeping an eye on immigrants we allowed into the country and have kept their info updated with the government are the least of our worries.

      I'm more concerned about the infrequent inspections of cargo ships or what about our current foriegn policies that seem to have created this whole threat of terrorism in the first place.

      --


      -"Food is disgusting, it's what they make shit from."-
    8. Re:Fear Sells. by jacksdl · · Score: 1

      Of course fear sells. Fear sells a lot of books, and movies and video games. Technology runs amok, gene therapy creates monsters, law enforcement database leads to 1984, Frankenstein, The China Syndrome -- EVERYBODY SCREAM!

      That was fun -- but it isn't balanced. If we let popular media be our benchmark, 9 out of 10 new ideas lead to disaster. Could a uber-database be misused? Absolutely! So our alternative is security through ignorance? Paranoia is more fun than rational balancing of risks vs. benefits.

      /.'ers should not fall for FUD from anyone.

    9. Re:Fear Sells. by Marshal3KSP3 · · Score: 1

      Just to play devil's advocate...

      In the most recent two conflicts you mentioned, civil liberties were indeed severely restricted... Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and put most of Maryland under martial law during the civil war. We all know about the Japanese during World War Two, as well as forcing people to limit what they bought (rationing), etc...

      This isn't *necessarily* anything new...

    10. Re:Fear Sells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just playing devil's advocate here.

      Not quite good enough...

      Hypothetically, though, what happens if it does contribute to blocking a terrorist attack?
      Would you change your mind about it?
      Would you rather have a few hundred people dead or have a little information stored about you in a database?


      No, what if it contributes to blocking a terrorist attack that would have killed a loved one? Would you rather have your parents, children dead or a little information stored about you?

      Now that is devil's advocate.

    11. Re:Fear Sells. by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      Exactly, thats why Al Queada won on Sept., 11 they've lost a lot of battles since, but won the war by making America scared shitless.

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    12. Re:Fear Sells. by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      That's really simplistic. How do you define "sensible foreign policy"? You make it sound as though if we shift our foreign policy slightly then suddenly everyone's going to love us? I think our enemies have made up their mind to hate us because they envy our prosperity and through our support of Israel we deny them their ultimate aims to exterminate the Jews. Don't buy their rationalizations.

  12. Which states? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

    I don't see a list of which 33 states we're talking about. Does that list exist somewhere?

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:Which states? by strredwolf · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm looking for. IF it turns out that Maryland was one, I'm forwarding this to my local press and try to raise awareness of a massive privacy violation.

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    2. Re:Which states? by blcamp · · Score: 1


      I'd bet that there are merely 33 *known* states.

      The Federales have probably told All Fifty that they better play ball on this one... or else they are Not PATRIOTs.

      --
      The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    3. Re:Which states? by Tassach · · Score: 1

      All the Feds have to do to get the states to play ball is threaten to withhold those precious Federal highway funds. This is exactly how the Feds forced all the states to adopt the 55 MPH speed limit and the 21 y/o drinking age.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    4. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do lower the DUI limit to 0.08 ABV

    5. Re:Which states? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > This is exactly how the Feds forced all the states to adopt the 55 MPH speed limit and the 21 y/o drinking age.

      Not all states have limits of 55, and at least until recently, LA had a drinking age under 21. So it isn't "forced," although it is underhanded.

    6. Re:Which states? by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      The speed limit was set at temporarily during the oil "shortage". States are now free to pick themselves. And have you diven on roads in those counties in LA during that period? not pretty from what I have heard.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    7. Re:Which states? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > have you diven on roads in those counties in LA during that period?

      You mean the legal age? No, I have never been to Louisiana. I guess giving kids alcohol after only two years of driving probably is a bad idea...

    8. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's just about exactly why there is no set list. The federal "MATRIX" alternatives got shot down because they met public resistance, because the public could know about it. It seems more elusive now, to create a cloud of uncertainty & no solid form which can be seen as a threat.

      I am going to write to my state's government officials & contact the press about this even w/o knowing our involvement. Even if the state hasn't contributed any data yet, it would be a proactive step at the least.

    9. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason the speed limit was set to 55 was to generate more money for the state in speeding tickets and to the lobbying insurance agencies, who could then make better rapes, i mean rates.

  13. down with big brother... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    down with big brother...down with big brother...down with big brother...

  14. Proof? by andih8u · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't worry, there's plenty of RAM for all 50 and the territories too.

    Do you actually have some good, solid evidence that the ram is being used for this? Aside from an article at Techworld that thinks it might be. At least try to show a tiny little bit of responsibility in the statements that you make.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:Proof? by Gr33nNight · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Do you actually have some good, solid evidence that the ram is not being used for this? Aside from an article at that thinks it might not be. At least try to show a tiny little bit of responsibility in the statements that you make.

    2. Re:Proof? by andih8u · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't have to present burden of proof since I'm not the one making outlandish statements in the first place...nor am I making those statements on the front page of a "news" site and alluding to them being true.

      --


      slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    3. Re:Proof? by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      He meant this article, which was posted on Slashdot a few days ago. Quit being such a troll.

      RAM Disk Link

    4. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you at least read the root of this thread where he clearly stated "Aside from an article at Techworld that thinks it might be."

    5. Re:Proof? by wafflemonger · · Score: 1

      This is something we call a joke.

    6. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people can put the pieces together (government buys buttload of RAM for network searches, then grabs massive amounts of citizens' data. Gee, I'll bet they're using it for piece talks), but evidently some can't.

      They've basically created a Kazaa for info on your private life.

    7. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like how some people can't spell peace correctly

    8. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soo.... it's guilty until proven innocent? WTF? you a girl? I smell female logic...

  15. I actually run one website by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Aksearch.net is a db I compiled from a few various databases the State of Alaska makes available. I have address and phone numbers for approx 98% of residents of Alaska. I also have DOB for about 5%, and voting records of all eligable voters. All available for free. Scarry huh?

    1. Re:I actually run one website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it is considering I have that same database here on my desk, hmmm WhitePages, spying on Americans for years!

  16. They're not messing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was recently stopped by the cops (while walking) here in FL. I was stopped for crossing the street with an open container of beer on the way to my neighbor's house.

    Anyway, what was spooky about it is they were able to immediately look up my record--I got busted smoking pot at a concert about 10 years ago in NJ--literally a thousand miles away. Even though this was expunged from my record nearly ten years ago, they found out about it from their cars, without me every mentioning that I ever lived anywhere other than FL. That sucks.

    1. Re:They're not messing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes I am also a "victim" of the system.
      A few years ago when renewing my drivers license in Nebraska I was told that I had a suspended license in the state of Florida. Hmmm I haven't been in Florida since Carter was President. I tried to fight the suspension but being a poor person (one that couldn't afford the $500 lawyer fee that was quoted) I initially threatened to turn myself in to the local authorities stating I had a warrant in the state of FL and at least get a "FREE" trip to Florida, I finally paid what was owed on the ticket and the extortion money^H^H^H^H^H reinstatement fee for the ticket only to find out that that particular person that had the outstanding warrant his physical description was no where near mine.... about 6 inches taller and he was a different color, along with having the DL number blacked out
      and I ended up paying over $200 just to get a stupid license renewal here in Nebraska.
      Makes you wonder if the tin-hat crowd is not on to something.

    2. Re:They're not messing around by qtp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Even though this was expunged from my record nearly ten years ago,
      localhost:~$ dict -d gcide expunged
      1 definition found

      From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:

      Expunge \Ex*punge"\ ([e^]ks*p[u^]nj"), v. t. [imp. & p. p.
      {Expunged} ([e^]ks*p[u^]njd"); p. pr. & vb. n. {Expunging}
      ([e^]ks*p[u^]n"j[i^]ng).] [L. expungere, expunctum, prick
      out, expunge, settle an account, execute; ex out + pungere to
      prick, puncture. See {Pungent.}]
      1. To blot out, as with pen; to rub out; to efface
      designedly; to obliterate; to strike out wholly; as, to
      expunge words, lines, or sentences.
      [1913 Webster]

      2. To strike out; to wipe out or destroy; to annihilate; as,
      to expunge an offense. --Sandys.
      [1913 Webster]

      Expunge the whole, or lop th' excrescent parts.
      --Pope.

      Syn: To efface; erase; obliterate; strike out; destroy;
      annihilate; cancel.
      [1913 Webster]
      I guess "expunge" means something different to law enforcement. It must be nice to be legally permitted to use words without any regard to thier actual meaning. If you or I were to takle the same liberties with the language when speakeng to a judge, we'd be charged with perjury.

      --
      Read, L
    3. Re:They're not messing around by claydean · · Score: 1

      Its called a 10-39 or wants and warrant check. It list all past criminal charges, and convictions if any on the charges.

  17. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's very likely that the bombers in Spain, like the hijackers here, had valid drivers licenses and other papers and good identification.

    After all, they don't need to hide until AFTER they do it. Then they are dead.

    This is like a stupid school teacher to tries to re-arrange seating order from alphabetical to something else when her classroom becomes disruptive. All she knows how to do is put things in order so that's what she does, when in reality the situation calls for some strong spankings and maybe kicking some students out.

  18. Re:Excellent by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Whatever we need to stop these bastards. The ones who fear these things are the ones who really have something to hide. I dunno about you, but I didn't enjoy the Spain incident.

    I don't know if it's on the web, but there was a wonderful series of Pogo (by Walt Kelly) strips from the early 70's where Spiro Agnew (then Vice President) was portrayed (appropriately) as a hyena in military uniform. For the good of the country all suspect people were rounded up and jailed. The end result was everyone in jail except him, including his cronies and assistants.

    Sounds like history repeating itself.

    Spiro Agnew later resigned due to mounting pressure over scandal for tax evasion and bribe taking.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. If you're going to troll that badly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    consider masturbation first.

    Or even sex with someone you love, which could be the same thing. It'll make you feel better.

    Honestly.

  20. yeah, damn the man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cops have no business knowing if you were convicted of smoking pot, posessing a firearm, or shooting a cop in another state!

  21. This rock keeps tigers away by k3v0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    do you see any tigers? it must work

    1. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When was the last foreign terrorist attack in this country?
      9/11

      Before that?
      Anyone?

      1993?

      I am NOT arguing with you, "see, we're safe" works for enough folks to keep the population apathetic. It IS creepy, though, when you think about it:
      How easy would it be to walk across the Canadian border, walk into a border-town theatre, and blow yourself up?

      It seems like this crap happens on a daily basis in the Middle East, but we never see this stuff.

      Either they aren't out to get us as much as we think or the government has already been doing a good job.

      Believe me, I understand the rammifications of a WMD attack -- looking at what certain chemicals and bioagents can do is very sobering. However I don't think the risk is high enough that the government now has a right to actively suspect (monitor) all citizens without cause.

      There is a difference between monitoring a suspect and monitoring everyone. When the government is looking over everyone's shoulders, day and night, you no longer have what I would call a 'free society.'

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    2. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by micromoog · · Score: 1

      k3v0, I want to buy your rock.

    3. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oklahoma city in 1995.

      But that wasn't the last terrorist attack on this country before 9/11. Our African embassies were attacked, US troop barracks in Saudi Arabia were attacked, the USS Cole was attacked, and there was an attack that was stopped on New Years Eve 2000. This is not a problem that we can just ignore.

    4. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by NickFusion · · Score: 1

      Micromoog;

      Asuuming you're a taxpaying American consumer, you already have.

      As for mine, I'm suggled safely between it and a hard place.

      --
      What were you expecting?
    5. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're way of the mark.

      "Oklahoma city in 1995."

      Oklahoma city was not caused by foreign terrorists -- that was a local nutcase. Refer to my post, I specifically said 'foreign'. Swing and a miss.

      ---
      "But that wasn't the last terrorist attack on this country before 9/11. Our African embassies were attacked, US troop barracks in Saudi Arabia were attacked, the USS Cole was attacked"

      These are attacks off of American soil. What good is a database on American citizens going to do in helping to stop these attacks? Strike 2.

      ---
      "and there was an attack that was stopped on New Years Eve 2000. This is not a problem that we can just ignore."

      Now you're bringing up unsuccessful attacks. My whole point is that either they're not trying hard enough, or we're catching them -- which seems to be the case here.

      The whole problem is that this doesn't happen nearly enough to warrant panic. We've had two local attacks in the last decade. Considering how easy the typical middle eastern attack (suicide bomber) could be carried out here, and the fact that we're not seeing any, should mean something to you. It is said (non-stop) that we're hated and threatened every day, but even the almost-unstoppable attacks aren't happening.

      Strike three. Back to the bench.

      In the end, the problem goes even further in that a database like this is monitoring American citizens who live here. It seems reasonable that potential terrorists can come here with all the training and money they need, spend a couple nights in a hotel, and blow themselves straight to hell. The effects of monitoring an entire population can be shrugged off by terrorists, but not those that live here.

      The negatives in this case absolutely blow away the positives.

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    6. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by NickFusion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe once you're in Canada, the thought of killing yourself for a cause seems less attractive,

      I suspect it's the universal healthcare, and very tasty bread.

      --
      What were you expecting?
    7. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Before that?
      Anyone?

      19 April 1995.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    8. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by iJosh · · Score: 1

      When was the last foreign terrorist attack in this country?
      9/11

      Before that?
      Anyone?

      1993?

      I am NOT arguing with you, "see, we're safe" works for enough folks to keep the population apathetic. It IS creepy, though, when you think about it:


      But our current adminsistration would have us believe that... billions are thwarted dialy.
      --
      Moderating to further my personal world domination agenda... and to get chicks.
    9. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Oklahoma city in 1995."

      Oklahoma city was not caused by foreign terrorists -- that was a local nutcase. Refer to my post, I specifically said 'foreign'. Swing and a miss.


      Hmmm. How sure of that are we, really? There were indications to the contrary, so we on the outside don't really know for sure. We know what the media and government have told us.

      Remember the Saudi man who was detained the next day with suspicious electronics in his bag, while preparing to fly out of the country? Yeah, they determined he wasn't involved, and eventually let him go. Hmmm...

    10. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a very profound statement, imho. I believe a section of the Tao Te Ching states something to that affect, that when a populace is well fed, there will be no more warfare, because there won't be anything to fight over. Generally, "desperate times call for desperate measures" will no longer hold true.

    11. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't a terrorist attack. It was a retribution bombing against the FBI.

    12. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Retribution bombings don't kill children and unaffiliated civil servants.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    13. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by dustmite · · Score: 1

      The Romans also understood this: http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/us_rome.htm: 'The Empire lasted as long as it did because the Romans weren't idiots. When the governor of Egypt sent Tiberius more taxes than he was supposed to, Tiberius reminded him: "I want my sheep shorn, not shaven."'

      Reading up on Bush's plans/vision, it would seem they understand this too (http://www.newamericancentury.org/).

    14. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point of correction - A US embassy is on US territory. The same goes for any embassy in any foreign nation. It's not really on topic (because the database won't track foreign citizens just because there's a US embassy in their nation), but an attack on a US embassy is an attack on US soil.

    15. Re:This rock keeps tigers away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's specious reasoning :)

  22. Catch-22! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I love this one from their FAQ: http://www.matrix-at.org/faq.htm

    If you can't access the data, how can you find the source!?

    CAN THE PUBLIC REVIEW THE MATRIX PILOT PROJECT DATA CONCERNING THEMSELVES?

    No. Members of the public cannot access individually identifiable information on themselves or others. Persons wishing to access data pertaining to themselves should communicate directly with the agency or entity that is the source of the data in question. For example, each participating state must provide a means for an individual to review and challenge the accuracy and completeness of his or her criminal history record, as authorized and required by 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 20.21(g).

    1. Re:Catch-22! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      For example, each participating state must provide a means for an individual to review and challenge the accuracy and completeness of his or her criminal history record

      Cant you read?

      That was mandated by the FOIA years ago.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Catch-22! by JivanMukti · · Score: 1

      I believe he's pointing out that you "can review and challenge the data" they have on you, only you "can't access the data."

    3. Re:Catch-22! by AdamMil · · Score: 1

      I believe what he's saying is that without being able to know what data they have stored on you, you won't be able to know which agencies to contact in order to review/correct said data.

      --
      Who moderates the meta-moderators?
  23. that many states... by bdigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    and the movie still sucked at the end?

  24. matrix by firstadopter.com · · Score: 0, Redundant

    how much of all this anti-terror stuff is really making us safer? I mean look at your airfare next time, we're paying a lot more money to be body searched at the airport now.

  25. Adding injury to insult... by amigoro · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Billions of records: The trouble with MATRIX, said Calbrese, is the volume of data it contains, much of which was purchased unbeknown to states by Seisint Inc. Seisint is the Florida information-technology company that developed the idea for MATRIX and landed a $1.6 million contract with that state's Department of Law Enforcement to pilot it.

    I am guessing Mr. Ashcroft pay this out of his own pcoket. So this tax payer's money.

    Is this going to make you any safer? Doubtful.
    Is this going to make you poorer? Yes, Indirectly.
    Is this going to make Seisinit richer? Sure.
    Is this going to violate your privacy? Most Definitely.

    So you are basically paying Seisinit to take away your privacy. This is a bit like this story here. But that one is a bit more believable.

    --


    Nothing to see here
  26. Notable quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article:
    Verdi White, Utah's deputy commissioner of public safety and MATRIX point man, downplays the threat to citizens' privacy, noting most of Seisint's data are public. "A lot of that stuff was purchased on the open market," White said.
    That's supposed to make us feel better?
    1. Re:Notable quote by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      That's supposed to make us feel better?

      No, but it should compel you to find out just how much of your "private information" is, in fact, on the open market. I suspect there's not much that isn't, especially nowadays.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  27. Re:There was already a similar software... by botzi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ....developped and running al the way till the late 80's, but a dude called Gorbachov kinda screwed it all up....(it's still in use only in outdated machines in China.)

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  28. What's the problem? by symbolic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To quote the article...
    Leavitt teamed up with Florida Gov. Jeb Bush -- President Bush's brother -- to pitch MATRIX to other states. The two briefed other governors on the project during a conference call referred to in Feb. 6, 2003, MATRIX board minutes.

    A member of the Bush family involved in something deceptive that will further erode our constitutional rights? NEVER, I say, NEVER!

    1. Re:What's the problem? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      You, Mr. A. Coward, are a troll.

      The right that's being violated is Amendment X. Any power not specifically granted to the federal government by the US Constitution is reserved to the states and the people. Now, admittedly, I've heard that Florida funded the company that set this up but that still doesn't give the feds the power to use it just because it's there.

      Of course all of this is preempted by Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution which gives the federal Congress the right to borrow money on the credit of the USA. This means that they can rack up huge loans and pass the savings onto the taxpayers in general. Once the loans are signed then its only a short step until they overstep their legally authorized powers in the interest of paying back the creditors. This perfectly explains why, while we're taxed at the lowest (or near lowest) rate in the modern world, in all reality by the end of the year we're surcharged, feed, fined and taxed to death. Nickel and dime, as it were.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    2. Re:What's the problem? by symbolic · · Score: 1


      Thanks for the laugh!

    3. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the same outfit that Gov Jeb Bush hired to purge the voter rolls in 2000, causing an estimated 10,000 (mostly black) voters to lose their rights and thereby throw the election. The tin-foil hat guys might be on to something...

    4. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, what the hell are you talking about? What on earth does the 10th Amendment have to do with some states deciding to contribute to a national database? NOTHING! And what the hell does deficit spending or taxes have to do with this argument? Seriously, are you retarded?

    5. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well your life won't be much different until they come take you away. But then no one will know about it cause they don't have to tell anyone. If I actually knew you, it'd be fun to watch you just disappear one day. Of course they'd never arrest someone as loyal as you.

  29. You think thats bad... by Loualbano2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Head over to this site:

    http://www.brbpub.com/pubrecsites.asp

    Free public records for all states and nationwide databases.

    I know for sure that Colorado and Wisconsin have criminal court proceedings online, effectivly putting your police record out there for anyone who knows your name or even parts of your name.

    It did come in handy for me lately, as I found out someone gave my name when they were arrested. Had this resource not be available, I may have never known. Now I have to get it off, and they don't make it easy.

    -ft

    1. Re:You think thats bad... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Imagine public records being accessable to the Public!?!

      First the tinfoilers and whiners were bitching about crazy government secrets. We want access to all the information the government has!!!!! So they pass the Freedom of Information Act. Now everyone has access to all the information the government has. Now the cry is "We want privacy!!".

      Meh, who gives a fuck.. All these idiots and their nazi germany references obviously have never read a history book, or hell, even seen any good WWII movies.

      The government has ALWAYS had my address, phone and social security number (i mean for fuckes sakes, they issue that)

      Cops have always had access to my arrest record via NIBRS, UCR.. Vehicle data through VINES, MILES, and other networks. So now they need "one resource to bind them all". One network to crash and become unusable, and believe me, the others I mentioned go up and down ALL the time.

      The only thing that bothers me about this is they payed all that cash for a redundant system that no doubt wont work all that well.

      The criminal data, for instance, where does it come from? From the court system, or perhaps from NIBRS, and even then only after the agencies send in their monthly submissions. It wont be updated on-the-fly. How do I know this? Because I would have had to write an interface to the system by now if it was any difference.

      Anyhow, who cares, more paranoia and handwaving from michael.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:You think thats bad... by donnyspi · · Score: 1

      Woah! There's tons of "private" info on those sites! I just looked at PDFs of the mortgage agreement my grandparents signed for their beach home. That's really scary.

  30. FUCKIN' BUSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Goddamned asshole mother-fucking pile of steaming shit! FUCK YOU GW you mother fucker!!!!

    1. Re:FUCKIN' BUSH by praedor · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your take on the appointee is correct, with the exception of your use of "mother fucker". I believe you meant "motherfucker". One word.


      I somewhat suspect that the motherfucker moniker is in error as I do not think Babs Bush would accept the cock of such a cowardly, pencil-necked, pathetic sloppy drunk cokehead as Shrub. His BROTHERS, on the other hand...I think it is likely a fact that Shrub is a "brotherfucker".

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  31. US Government Purshases Large RAM disk by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Perhaps this has something to do with the large RAM disk the government just purchased.

  32. Paranoia day by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Darpa with a new Internet for more control, more MATRIX states. I am starting to get scared. I am Canadian and the only hope we have is that the US has freedom of expression that we can emulate. Please rise up and fight this demon that justifies itself with the "think of the children argument". The end does not justify the means.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:Paranoia day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand the DARPA thing. What they are working on will actually be a great boon to freedom and liberty as the tech enters the general market, much like the original internet.

  33. The MATRIX by Vexware · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Enough with the MATRIX puns, look at the issue seriously. I live in France and had never heard of this project before, but it sure looks scary, or at least, the government not saying everything about it is.

    Can be read in the article: "We don't want our information floating out there when we don't know what's on the database or who has access to it," said Sen. Ron Allen, D-Stansbury Park. It seems the people actually involved in this do not know very much what information will be withheld, let alone the people whose information is withheld. I mean, how can you be sure what you're being told is the truth when you see that the people involved with the project do not know that much about it themselves?

    The representatives say that the MATRIX is just a way of accessing individuals' information faster, but I don't really see how this could help them to predict where and when the next terrorist attack will be -- it will only really help them once the acts are actually done, I should think.

    I'm not stating that the government are surely up to something dodgy here, and after all, perhaps they might not be lying when they say that this will allow them to get hold of currently available information faster. But I just cannot read this without an ounce of doubt that a few privacy breaches might help them to fulfill their task.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval
  34. Good thing Leavitt is gone by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Informative
    Or we'd never have found out about this. Leavitt recently left to head the EPA, which is odd since I seem to remember that his family has run a business that caused polution and killed a bunch of fish at some point.

    When he left for EPA his Lt. Gov, Walker took over and found out about this MATRIX stuff and told the public. I hope Walker or Matheson gets elected next time around.

    1. Re:Good thing Leavitt is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah.. good thing. Now Leavitt is in charge of what the Power Companies can do in this country.

  35. 51 st State by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    Does UK plan to contribute to the MATRIX?Our reichfuhrer David Blunkett has always favoured keep all citizens on Surviellance methods.

    On a more Topical note:do the Countries which are closely allied with US such as UK,Canada and Australia plan to join /contribute to this?

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  36. ONE fucking event and we lose everything!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you!!!! There is not terrorist threat!!! The only threat out there today is this fucking administrations attempts to take away all civil liberties and freedoms. EVERY CITIZEN IS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT!!!!!! Fuck this goddamned administration and their right wing religious aganda!!! Blame the fuck that speaks to God in the white house, because he's the looney fuck that started all of this to line his own fucking pockets.

    1. Re:ONE fucking event and we lose everything!!!!!! by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      C'mon, tell us how you really feel.

    2. Re:ONE fucking event and we lose everything!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, someone could die laughing from that post. Good work! :D

    3. Re:ONE fucking event and we lose everything!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite your overuse of profanity, caps, and exclamation points (which make you look a little crazy); I pretty much agree with everything you say.

    4. Re:ONE fucking event and we lose everything!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's only because I am CRAZY!!!

  37. MOD PARENT / GREAT GRANDPARENT UP! by goldspider · · Score: 1
    Far too many irresponsible statements are made in these headlines that are at best baseless speculation.

    If Slashdot editors want to make paranoid claims and assert they are true, they damn well better be able to back them up with FACTS! It's not up to us to prove their wild assertions untrue!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  38. A warm fuzzy one by Viggeh! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love feeling guilty until proven innocent. It gives me a warm, fuzzy and safe feeling and makes me able to sleep at night. And remember kids, just as long as everyone videotapes everybody, everything will be alright.

  39. Altered Star Wars quote ... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    TARKIN:
    The regional governors now have direct control over territories. Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this MATRIX.

    --
    CT

  40. this will be used for political purposes by directrealist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it is only a matter of time before this is used to round up non terrorist criminals to make some politician look good. that is essentialy what this kind of information is best for. no terrorist is going to show up with the kind of info they are putting together. there is no way some this will not be used against the peaceful criminals in this country. its a damn shame.

    --
    this is not a Sig.
    1. Re:this will be used for political purposes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many states already have Matrix like programs under the local paramilitaries and courts. Minnesota has one that put all police data in private control. Minnesota CriMNet It has whistleblower hackers, politicians, guns and bad management all wrapped in a huge wad of fear.

    2. Re:this will be used for political purposes by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      What non-terrorists? The Bush administration has called the NEA a terrorist organization and referred to anyone opposed to Bush's Iraq policies as a terrorist supporter. Liberals are not seen as a legitimate alternative party; they are seen as evil by a president who see things in terms of Godly vs. Satanic.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  41. small difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smoking pot is a misdemeanor which, in NJ at least, you may pay the state to have expunged from your record if it's a first offense. This is what I did--and I've never been arrested for anything before or since then.

    Despite paying to have it expunged and staying out of trouble, it appears this offense from when I was rather young will still follow me around now wherever I live in the US.

    1. Re:small difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post right below yours seems particularly relevant:

      For example, each participating state must provide a means for an individual to review and challenge the accuracy and completeness of his or her criminal history record, as authorized and required by 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 20.21(g).

      Give NJ a call and figure out what's up.

    2. Re:small difference by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

      NJ has little concern over laws. After all, the State Supreme Court replaced Torricelli on the ballot with Lautenberg, even though there was no legal grounds for such a decision. Paying them would probably make them treat you nice, though.

    3. Re:small difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an educated guess from another AC - your conviction record was expunged, your arrest record was not expunged, just like your fingerprints - taken as part of the arrest - are still in the system.

  42. I liike this part: by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1
    It is critical to ensure appropriate safeguards are in place to protect the privacy of personal information within the FACTS database so this accumulation of information will not be used to monitor innocent citizens.

    So are they saying they'll use it to only monitor guilty citizens? Guilty of what? Isn't everybody innocent until proven guilty? If they were already proven guilty, why monitor them?

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:I liike this part: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, my favorite wierdly phrased part from the matrix website (under misconceptions):

      The MATRIX FACTS application does not contain magazine subscription lists, reading lists, telephone calling records, bank transactions, lists of credit cards or credit card transactions, and; therefore, such data is not provided by MATRIX to law enforcement. Under federal law, when such data is required in law enforcement investigations, it can only be obtained under a judicial order; i.e., subpoena.

      MATRIX FACTS != MATRIX??
      So, they have the data, but the application won't allow it to be viewed?? /me takes off his tinfoil hat.

  43. Some Restraint Made by schnarff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As it turns out, I actually know the person who prototyped the MATRIX system very well -- it's my wife's aunt.

    On one hand, this scares me a bit, because I know her work, and she's good -- which means that this system probably functions as intended.

    On the other hand, I have the assurances that a) she's a decent person, who generally supports civil liberties and frowns on abuse of government powers; and b) she's explicitly said that there were several requests that the government made during the initial design phase that she explicitly ruled out -- she told the government they were going too far, and that she wouldn't be a part of what they wanted. They actually backed off, too from what I've been told.

    Of course, I realize that I have very little credibility here as just another Slashdot poster...but for anyone inclined to believe, the good news is that *some* restraint was made in designing the MATRIX system.

    1. Re:Some Restraint Made by directrealist · · Score: 1

      it not the inventor we are woried about. even if intended for good it will most undoubtedly be used by somone else for evil.

      --
      this is not a Sig.
    2. Re:Some Restraint Made by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the government could just take control of the whole thing and do whatever the devil it likes.

      --
      "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
    3. Re:Some Restraint Made by RandomizeTimer · · Score: 1

      So your wifes aunt told THE GOVERNMENT that they were going too far....and they BACKED OFF. I don't think it works that way.

    4. Re:Some Restraint Made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All they have to do is offshore and outsource the implementaion to avoid your wife's aunt's resistances.

    5. Re:Some Restraint Made by glorf · · Score: 1

      So your Aunt says "No you can't have that feature because its not nice", and then once the govt gets the complete version 1.0, they take the code and add those features back in for version 2.0.

      As long as the government has the money, someone will do the coding.

  44. And you've been labelled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the next time they get you they know what to plant on your person to keep you quiet. The gestapo is coming and now they know everything about you.

    All hail der fuhror BUSH!!!

  45. It keeps away the red herrings, too by ianscot · · Score: 0, Troll

    And the "Patriot" Act sure is preventing terrorist librarians and teachers' unions from blowing up the County Courthouse. I haven't read one story about that on Google. Must be working.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  46. Re:FIRST FIX THE FUCKING FLAG POST by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Why do you say that? Maybe you'd rather have it with a slash through it?

  47. John Kerry by 511pf · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't care that much fo John Kerry, but if you want any hope at all of this type of thing going away, you'd better get out and vote for him in November.

    1. Re:John Kerry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely.

      He DID vote for the Patriot Act too, you know.

      www.lp.org

  48. Remember the Florida election of 2000 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remember the Florida election of 2000 when a private database company scrubbed thousands of eligible voters from the rolls? Well now one of the co-founders of Database Technologies is back in the headlines -- he's working with law enforcement agents in Florida to create what may soon expand into a national surveillance system. We talk with privacy expert Wayne Madsen, investigative reporter Greg Palast and a top intelligence official from the state of Florida.

    When is Joe Six pack going to wake up to the fact that in secret the government has conspired to create a dossier on every citzen in this country and this is who they hired to do it:

    Hank Asher then creates the MATRIX as a state level network version of the TIA office. Essentially continuing the TIA office, but freeing it from congressional oversight and federal whistleblower protections. He admits smuggling millions of dollars worth of cocaine in 1981 and 1982. Coincidentally at the time when the Iran-Contra dealings were in full swing.
    But this is only speculation. Could there be more of a link between illegal dealings between Hank Asher and the republican party? OF COURSE THERE IS!

    In 1992, Asher founded Database Technologies, which later merged with ChoicePoint. In 1999, he founded Seisint Inc. by merging two companies. He is still on Seisint's board of directors, and continues to play an active role in the company.During the 2000 presidential election ChoicePoint, gave Florida officials a list with the names of 8,000 ex-felons to "scrub" from their list of voters. But it turns out none on the list were guilty of felonies, only misdemeanors.

    So there we have it. We went from having a domestic spying agency run by a five time felon to having the same domestic spying program sans congressional oversight and whistle blower protections run by a convicted drug smuggler who has proven that he'll break the law to further the republican agenda.

    http://www.oldamericancentury.org/oh_republicans .h tm

    A Florida law enforcement data-sharing network is about to go national. In the name of counterterrorism, the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security are pouring millions of dollars into the system to expand it to local law enforcement agencies across the nation. It's called Matrix, which stands for Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange. According to the Washington Post, the computer network accesses information that has always been available to investigators but brings it together and enables police to access it with extraordinary speed. Civil liberties and privacy groups say the Matrix system dramatically increases the ability of local police to snoop on individuals.

    http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/08 /0 7/1427223

    The Florida company that built the database was founded by the man behind ChoicePoint and Database Technologies. The companies administered the contract that stripped thousands of African Americans from the Florida voter roles before the 2000 election.

    Although narrower in scope than John Poindexter's controversial Terrorist Global Information Awareness program, Matrix may serve a similar purpose because it provides unprecedented access to US residents regardless of their criminal background. And states are eager to participate in the new program. On Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security announced plans to launch a pilot program in state law enforcement data-sharing among Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York.

  49. michael strikes back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re:Proof? (Score:2, Informative) by andih8u (639841) on Friday March 12, @12:54PM (#8544878)

    Starting Score: 1 point
    Moderation +1
    100% Informative
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier 0 (Edit)
    Total Score: 2

    Funny how that modifier can just vanish like that.

    1. Re:michael strikes back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fault for posting anonymously and not thinking I need to click log out before posting if I've modded.

  50. Mormons and The Matrix by auburnate · · Score: 1

    The Mormons comb records and databases of people already dead. So thinking that they handed over some uber list of American citizens to the government is flawwed thinking.

  51. Avoiding "Troll" in the first place... by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny
    With this in mind, here are tips to help you avoid being labeled a troll:

    Mouth shut, eyes forward, do what you're told. Don't question the editors.

    Smile for the cameras. They're everywhere and they're watching you.

    Secure all servers, workstations, toasters, etc. with Linux. Windows isn't funny anymore, it's subversive.

    Mod down your fellow posters on the slightest hint they're windows users. You won't get a free subscription, but you help keep Slashdot safe.

    Suspicious links: Don't click 'em, otherwise you might know where they go or what horrors they may contain.

    Twiddle your thumbs when considering posting evidence that Windows is OK to avoid Astroturfer label.

    Vote for the most paranoid, irrational sounding politician, but only if their platform is Open Sourced.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  52. "We're bastards to govern" by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Seriously, if you love freedom, you strive to protect it; not from King George, not from Ivan, because you did that already. Don't forget to defend your freedom no matter the threat. If your president and attorney general is the threat, you know what you have to do. You have no excuse.

    I was reading James Mitchner's Iberia up to a couple months ago. It's terribly ironic considering what happened in Spain on the 11th and the political climate in the USA. The book was written, IIRC, in the late 60's and one spaniard told Mitchner, refering to the harsh governance of Franco, that the spaniards need a firm hand because (pardon if quote is not exact) "We're such bastards to govern."

    I consider this phrase frequently when reading about autocratic or strong central governments and people apparently happy to be lead thusly. It's worrying.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  53. Who came up with the name? by elbarrio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure this has been said already, but who in their right mind would choose to call this thing MATRIX and then not expect people to get upset about it leading to some form of totalitarianism. I mean didn't any of them see the movie? This has got to be one of the stupidest marketing mistakes of all time.

    1. Re:Who came up with the name? by Zareste · · Score: 1

      I think what we've learned from all this is that it really doesn't matter what we think about it. I'm sure the title 'MATRIX' is just an in-your-face way of saying, 'yeah, it's at the point where we own you now, and there's nothing you can do, is there?'

      I think they're going to be more honest about their new systems and bills from now on. Next proposal from congress: The Running Every Aspect of Your Life Act.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  54. some MATRIX related docs by BigGerman · · Score: 1

    here
    And remember, we are stll the people. It is not late to stop these things.

  55. Wrong blame by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    All the blame should be centered toward the people YOU put into state offices. Congressman, Governors, Senators, you get the picture. These people voted for this shit. THEY voted for it, THEY brought it to life.

    Would you be saying the same thing if a Democrat was in office? Very, very doubtful. You'd praise the fucker for doing a good job.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    1. Re:Wrong blame by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Oh poor naive little troll.

      The democratic method of holding elections by casting ballots is one of the oldest methods of decision making known to man since the time when a bunch of BC's sat around a fire and decided which direction to travel tomorrow on their quest for tires.

      It's only logical that METHODS TO RIG THE VOTING system have existed just as long.

      Cripes...

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    2. Re:Wrong blame by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      So to you, EVERYTHING is a scandal or somehow rigged by Republicans? Now who is being naive...

      And since you went to VOTING, if Gore had WON HIS OWN MEASLY STATE, Florida would never have mattered.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    3. Re:Wrong blame by Zareste · · Score: 1

      Maxi points out the obvious flaw and the reply is "Oh, these nice innocent politicians would never rig an election! Now if you'll excuse me I'm going to go vote between one psycho who will take away our rights, another psycho who will take away our rights, and another psycho who will take away our rights. The solution is so obvious!"

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    4. Re:Wrong blame by maximilln · · Score: 1

      I did vote. However, one properly cast vote in a sea of random votes isn't going to send any reasonable message. It's like posting on USENET. The signal to noise ratio is far too low.

      This is how the voting system is rigged. The vast majority of people have no concept of the real issues, they have no idea of the actual role of government, and they tend to vote for soap-box issues or the candidate whose party affiliation feeds their personal bias. This ensures that the vast majority of votes are cast randomly at best or, as can be proven by the predictable success and failure of Hollywood movies, cast in the direction that the major media favors.

      And no. It's not rigged by Republicans. Must I explain a "Dog and Pony Show"? There are no real rebulicans or democrats.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    5. Re:Wrong blame by elbarrio · · Score: 1
      There are no real rebulicans or democrats.

      alright, I'm sorry here, but listen up all you folks who support 3rd party candidates, there are differences between republicans and democrats. I agree that the issue of personal privacy is not often one of them, but to say that there are no differences between republicans and democrats is just naive. If republicans ran the country, we would have no unemployment benefits, no abortion, a military that is twice the size it is, no state or federal funding of public schools, no welfare, capital punishment without a lengthy appeals process, no affirmative action, a debt that is 3 times at large (because republicans don't like taxing, just spending) etc. etc. I'm sure some of you agree or disagree over whether we should have these things in the first place, but to say that the republicans overall don't favor and reject a different set of goverment actions from what the democrats favor and reject is just naive. You may feel neither party favors the ideas you agree with, but that's a different issue.

      I think the problem most people have is that they just don't like democracy. It has nothing to do with the intelligence of other voters, people just don't like the idea that another person could disagree with their view points. Most people are disatisfied with the government because they want to see their agenda adopted... and guess what, it never will be adopted. That's the nature of compromise in a democratic system. The reasoning is that it's better to always get some of what you want than to risk getting none of what you want. Go ahead complain because that is the only way you can get some of what you want, but don't be so arrogant as to assume that just because people have a different opinion then you that they are just mindless idiots who do whatever Fox news or NBC or tells them to.

    6. Re:Wrong blame by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Would you be saying the same thing if a Democrat was in office?"

      You say that as though Republicans are any different from Democrats. At this point, pubbies are pretty much liberal-lite. The few real conservatives left with any say get shouted down by the liberals and neo-con morons of the supposedly right-leaning party.

      Why are we spending more than ever? Why are we looking at a $500+ Billion deficeit? Why are we pumping $530 Billion into a socialist medical plan? Why are we sapping the life out of Social(ist) Security while continuing to pretend it's doing something useful? Why are we pushing things like TIA? Why are we pushing for gun control on the same level Reno & Friends were? Why are we letting illegal immigrants stay in this country? Why are we allowing them to work here legally? Why are we contining to push the farce known as the "War on Drugs", which is really just a code for wasteful government spending designed to look pretty while sending the Bill of Rights through a shredder? Why are we locking US citizens up without trials or lawyers? Why are we passing censorship laws? Why are we even talking about adding Constitutional amendments to snatch even more rights from the states?

      The list goes on and on, but suffice it to say that Bush and the rest of the Pubbies have shifted left of many Dems - so far so, in fact, that many so-called liberals are getting whiplash from it.

      We've actually managed to elect a Republican President who's too liberal for many liberals.

      The problem with your logic, in terms of "us" voting these people into office, is that these same people are now utilizing fear in an extreme manner to force citizens into submission. They present programs such as this as the only alternative to sudden, painful, horrifying death. They marginalize civil liberties advocates on BOTH sides of the political spectrum as extremists, and then proceed to convince the public at large that the entire nation will burst into flames unless these types of actions are taken.

      That's called treason, in my book.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    7. Re:Wrong blame by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

      Well according to the media, there's nothing wrong with Democrats, its the evil Nazi loving Republicans that are doing everything.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    8. Re:Wrong blame by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right maximillin. The majority of American's could care less about issues. All they want to know is if the next president is cute or not.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    9. Re:Wrong blame by maximilln · · Score: 1

      -----
      Most people are disatisfied with the government because they want to see their agenda adopted
      -----
      If we ever had a group of politicians who would adhere to the Tenth Amendment this wouldn't be a problem because their agendas would be meaningless. The Tenth Amendment explicitly states that, good idea or not, it's really none of the government's business to be meddling in things like this.

      It's there for a good reason. Every good idea leads inevitably to abuses when mandated from above.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    10. Re:Wrong blame by Loki_1929 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny how Dems decry the media as the puppets of multi-national conglomerates owned by frat buddies of high-ranking pubblies, while pubbies decry the liberal hippie media as a bunch of commie-loving bastards.

      What's even funnier is that Oliver Stone, probably one of the most hated (by right-wingers) directors in Hollywood once made a film about how aweful and terrible the media is. It was called, "Natural Born Killers".

      The media doesn't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican. The media doesn't care what your position is. The media doesn't care if you're alive, dead, growing mushrooms out of your eyelids, or bleeding to death in the back of a city cab. What they do care about are the ratings you and your story may bring to them. What the media does care about is reporting the things that will keep them employed and successful.

      There's a concept that's lost on most people these days, and it's something that would solve probably 80% of the problems plaguing us at this point: personal responsibility.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    11. Re:Wrong blame by elbarrio · · Score: 1
      It's there for a good reason. Every good idea leads inevitably to abuses when mandated from above.

      I would change that to be every good idea has the possibility for abuse. since every possible abuse will eventually come to fruition, it is possible to say every good idea has abuses. That doesn't mean you don't continue with the good idea. For instance, I believe in putting people away for life who murder someone (I loathe capital punishment except in the absolute most extreme cases... but that's a whole other discussion). Now, this leaves the possibility for wrong convictions and putting people in jail who don't deserve it. Does that mean we shouldn't punish murderers? of course not, it just means that we should be more careful to guard against the abuses.

      The Tenth Amendment explicitly states that, good idea or not, it's really none of the government's business to be meddling in things like this.

      I totally disagree. Part of the problem you are discussing is that federalism is a vague concept that is hard to outline. There are too many nooks and crannies within it to be able to always decide whether something is constitutional or not. The tenth ammendment says that all powers not given to the federal government are given to the states... but the elastic cause says that any law which is neccessary and proper to the execution of the enumerated powers of the u.s. legislature is considered an enumurated power itself. Therefore, since it is within the enumerated powers to prevent foreign invasion and rebellion, which terrorism can be considered to be (one or the other that is), by u.s. legislature, then the legislature is also allowed to do everything that is not expressly prohibited by the constitution to protect against terrorism. Privacy laws are an extension of the fourth ammendment (the one that requires search warrants), but it is unclear at best whether this ammendment extends to things you don't actually possess, like your social security number or criminal record. As such, I don't think it can be argued that collection of this information by the federal government can be considered a violation of the 10th ammendment.

      That said, I think having the government know so much about its citizens is inherently dangerous. There is only so much you can do to guard against abuses, and in this case those guards may not be enough. But my disagreement with it is not on constitutional grounds.

    12. Re:Wrong blame by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1
      We've actually managed to elect a Republican President who's too liberal for many liberals.

      Really? Too liberal?

      IMHO, this whole thing is not about ideaology, nor is it about right or left politics. In fact, it's not about politics at all. It's about greed. These greedy bastards are using the tools of politics, fear, removal of civil liberties, and easy access (for a few people) to consolidated information for their own financial gain.

      Even when Bush is out of office next year, he will retire a very wealthy man, as well as Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, several Generals and Admirals, and some media "pundits". There is surely enough wealth in this country to be spread amongst the 100 most greedy bastards; the rest of us can go a-beggin'.

      We need more than a political solution to this problem. We need to throw these greedy fuckers in Jail and let them be raped like they've been raping the rest of the world for years.

      -- End of Rant.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    13. Re:Wrong blame by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      What's even funnier is that Oliver Stone, probably one of the most hated (by right-wingers) directors in Hollywood once made a film about how aweful and terrible the media is. It was called, "Natural Born Killers".

      My dad is definitely a "right-winger" and was not impressed by this film. Its violence can be a bit off-putting, but not when you understand the reasons for which it was made.

    14. Re:Wrong blame by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "We need to throw these [[Bush,] Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, several Generals and Admirals, and some media "pundits"] greedy fuckers in Jail and let them be raped like they've been raping the rest of the world for years."

      Your 'solution' strikes me as being no better than the acts already perpetrated against this nation by those you've mentioned. A better idea may, in fact, be to put mechanisms into place which would prevent the problems we've seen under Bush/Cheney from happening once more in the future.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    15. Re:Wrong blame by maximilln · · Score: 1

      ----
      all powers not given to the federal government are given to the states...
      ----
      And the PEOPLE--a very important part which you omitted with "...". The PEOPLE are the most important part of a democracy. There is no "elastic clause" to the Tenth Amendment. It's very plain, very simple, it's not a vague concept and it's not hard to outline. Anything not explicitly granted within the US Constitution goes to the states and the people. There is no weasling around it.

      Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government given the power to create a roster or roll call or database of the citizenry. That is the sort of thing that the founding fathers were trying to escape from merry 'ole England for. If the individual states want to contract to make databases that's fine (if granted within the scope of the states' constitution) but the feds have absolutely no business even acknowledging that such a thing exists.

      ----
      I would change that to be every good idea has the possibility for abuse
      ----
      When mandated from above it's guaranteed. No top level government is completely free of greedy self-serving politicians. As long as they exist they will exploit any power that is available to them. It's natural law.

      -----
      Does that mean we shouldn't punish murderers?
      -----
      Blown way out of proportion and way out of context. But, since you mention it, I personally don't feel that the federal government has any place in trying murderers. Let them go round-robin with the locales. It's this sort of redundancy (the existence of both local laws prohibiting murder and federal laws prohibiting murder) that feeds the egomania and abuse of power that's rancidly prevalent in our current system.

      Were you aware that the vast majority of federal laws include a preemption clause which seeks to make the federal law more sovereign than any equivalent state or local law? Think of the implications. If we live in a true democracy for the people why would the federal government ever even get into the habit of including preemption clauses?

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    16. Re:Wrong blame by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1
      You have a valid point. I definitely agree that we need to have some controls in place to prevent this from happening again. Also, it will take a long while to clean up the mess that we've created.

      Perhaps I should rephrase my comment in a less emotional manner: Those currently in power in the US are simply criminals and they should be treated as such (prosecuted and given a fair trial). Once they are no longer in a position to cause any more damage, we can then begin the process of cleaning up and preventing future mistakes.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    17. Re:Wrong blame by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      Just so I'm not complaining without some semblence of constructive commentary, I might like to suggest that the problems we're currently facing would be largely solved and prevented from happening again by stripping down the Federal government like a Corvette left unattended in South-Central LA on a Saturday night.

      With the Federal government all but dismantled, the vast majority of the problems we're working through now would be impossible.

      There was a very good reason we enumerated a rather short list of powers and responsibilities for our Federal government. For clues as to why it was done in this way, open up a newspaper.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    18. Re:Wrong blame by elbarrio · · Score: 1
      The elastic clause, Article I, section 8 of the U.S. constitution:

      To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

      The tenth ammendment basically says that anything not covered by this clause (for instance trade that cannot be construed to be inter-state trade) is for the states to regulate. However, terrorism is clearly covered in the enumerated powers, so therefore the elastic clasuse applies to it, not the 10th ammendment.

  56. Umm... what? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 2, Informative
    This isn't nearly the same article that claims that there's only five states left...

    Article Text here

    New York and Wisconsin Opt Out of Anti-Crime Database
    ............
    MARK JOHNSON
    Associated Press

    ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) -- New York and Wisconsin have joined the list of states that have pulled out of an anti-crime database program that civil libertarians say endangers citizens' privacy rights.

    Just five states now remain involved in Matrix out of more than a dozen that had signed up to share criminal, prison and vehicle information with one another and cross-reference the data with privately held databases.

    Questions over federal funding and the waning potential for benefit to law enforcement ultimately prompted New York's withdrawal, said Lynn Rasic, a spokeswoman for the New York State Office of Public Security.

    In a letter earlier this week, New York State Police Lt. Col. Steven Cumoletti noted that as more states withdraw, Matrix's usefulness diminishes.

    The administrator of the Wisconsin Division of Criminal Investigation, meanwhile, cited cost, privacy and potential abuses of such a large database.

    "When you added it all up, there were more negatives than positives,'' said the administrator, Jim Warren. He said the state signed up for Matrix about a month ago, but withdrew this week without having put any money into it or trained anyone.

    Known formally as Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange, Matrix links government records with up to 20 billion records in databases held by Seisint Inc., a private company based in Boca Raton, Fla.

    The Seisint records include details on property, boats and Internet domain names that people own, their address history, utility connections, bankruptcies, liens and business filings, according to an August report by the Georgia state Office of Homeland Security.

    Officials with Seisint and the U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

    The American Civil Liberties Union has complained that Matrix could be used by state and federal investigators to compile dossiers on people who have never been suspected of a crime. Seisint officials have said safeguards are built into the system to prevent such abuses.

    "We're pleased New York has finally seen the light and opted out of this data-mining program that would allow the government to troll billions of private, personal records for information they have no business getting,'' said Donna Lieberman, director of the New York Civil Liberties Union.

    New York started questioning Matrix when several other states dropped out because of privacy or cost concerns, Rasic said. Alabama, California, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Kentucky, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and West Virginia have all left or declined to join after actively considering it.

    "It was going to end up costing a lot for something we already had,'' Tela Mange, Texas Department of Public Safety spokeswoman, said Thursday.

    Matrix, short for the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange, began in 2002 in Florida. Connecticut, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania also remain participants in the program, which was helped by $12 million in initial funding from the federal government.

    Julie Norris, spokeswoman for Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, said the state plans to stick with Matrix, considering it "a powerful investigation tool'' that uses information already available through public records.

    "It allows for an intelligent search that is quick, fast and efficient,'' she said.

    The Michigan State Police use Matrix on a limited basis and continue to support it, said spokeswoman Shanon Akans.

    ------------------

    I swear, whenever I read about posts that infringe on privacy in this forum, all the dangerous 1984 references sound like more whining and justification based on more fear, uncertainty, and doubt. I've ceased to take any of it seriously.

    1. Re:Umm... what? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > whenever I read about posts that infringe on privacy in this forum, all the dangerous 1984 references sound like more whining and justification based on more fear, uncertainty, and doubt. I've ceased to take any of it seriously.

      And that's where the danger is.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  57. Re:Excellent by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The ones who fear these things are the ones who really have something to hide.

    This is true because, as Authority Figures, our exalted leaders and police officials can be trusted completely to act diligently and with only the public interest in mind. Abuses of power for political or personal reasons are quite impossible, now and evermore. Liberals foolishly fail to understand this simple fact that every Good Dog knows.

    The really cool thing about this is that they'll always be able to round up a good number of plausible suspects for anything that might happen, without all the hassle and expense of identifying the actual perpetrator or - what's worse - having to actually prove guilt. That way Ashcroft et.al. get to look like heroes whether any real justice is done or not. We the People insist on no more than that somebody be apprehended. I'd like to have a job like that. I could say, "Lookee here, Mr. Boss-Man, sir. I wrote you a hunnert lines o' code," and Mr. Boss-Man wouldn't even care if it compiled, much less did anything useful.

    I dunno about you, but I didn't enjoy the Spain incident.

    You're taking a big leap of faith here if you're suggesting that the liberty/safety trade-off is real. Under Hitler, Stalin and Mao, nobody was safe. Don't expect any better here if we hand absolute power to Bush and his minions (or anyone else, for that matter).

  58. Wow by Nibelungo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a great time not to be an american...

  59. MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn funny shit.

  60. SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP. DUMBASS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking sheep.

  61. The problem is birth control in the Bush family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    or lack of it, they are breeding like flies, put a stop to it before they get out of control....oh wait

  62. Latin by NSash · · Score: 1

    Your sig should be: Cogito me cogitare, ergo cogito me esse. (At least I think. Wouldn't I feel silly if I turned out to be wrong?)

  63. The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by nothingtodo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People better be concerned about this. The general populace does not know what's contained in the database, only that it has some kind of information on just about everybody. Unlike a credit report, a citizen cannot access it, view it, dispute it, or make corrections to it. Who knows if the information within is even correct? Even though it's claimed that it will only be used for 'noble' purposes, it's still possible for someone authorized to abuse it or use it for 'sneaky' reasons. Insert your own speculative scenario here. From what I can tell, there's no checks and balances and that is something be to concerned about.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
    1. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by hesiod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Unlike a credit report, a citizen cannot access it, view it, dispute it, or make corrections to it.

      Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. It's fine that you are against this, as I am too (and I am in one of the few states still thinking it's a good idea), but you CAN make corrections. There is a process called "review and challenge," which while you cannot look at the direct results from this system, you can get the list of info it gives (that doesn't make much sense, but it is the case). If any of it is wrong you can submit a correction. Now, whether that request goes any further than the trashcan is questionable.

      Of course, if, you are labelled a terrorist on this system for voting Libertarian, when you request it they can just say "nope, nothing found, have a nice day."

      That's why I say we should find out the location of the key points & blow them up in the name of freedom. Am I going to have pigs/feds at my door for saying that? Probably not (damn, and I wanted to try out my new rifle), but it's still a good idea.

    2. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by maximilln · · Score: 1

      -----
      There is a process called "review and challenge"
      -----
      Is this the same process that allows me to fill out a claim form for the lost zipper on my jacket at the airport? (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=100266&cid=85 44837)

      Review and challenge only exists if you have the time and money to wade through the monolithic ball of red tape that's in the way. Since most of us are too busy working overtime to pay taxes, fees, surcharges, and fines (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=100266&cid=85 45360) many of which fund circular programs like this one, we can't participate in your idealistic review and challenge.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    3. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by hesiod · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Review and challenge only exists if you have the time and money to wade through the monolithic ball of red tape that's in the way.

      I had to go through a review & challenge when being hired to my current job (there was an item on my criminal record that was supposed to have been expunged). I had to send in a form (easily obtainable) and sign it, with my fingerprints on it (I wasn't happy about that, but realize it's a necessity). Two weeks later, I got a reply and sent in some papers, all was taken care of.

      Total cost to me? About 4 hours. Yeah, it shouldn't have happened in the first place, but I did not have to "wade through [a] monolithic ball of red tape."

      So it has nothing to do with idealism, of which I am certainly a proponent, I speak from personal experience on this one.

    4. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by SnatMandu · · Score: 1

      Why are the finger prints necessary?

    5. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Why are the finger prints necessary?

      I believe it is to verify that you are who you say you are -- you're requsting what should be confidential data, and it`s easier to forge a signature than a fingerprint. At least that's what I think. It could be a sneaky way to get a larger database of fingerprints, or both.

    6. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by SnatMandu · · Score: 1

      Why is it confidential? If you're convicted, it's public record. I'd guess the fact of your arrest is also public record...

    7. Re:The concern of potential abuse of MATRIX by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If you're convicted, it's public record. I'd guess the fact of your arrest is also public record...

      I wasn't convicted, I was "processed and released." I believe the fact of the arrest was public, but the details were to be kept by just one office for a year until expunged. Instead it was sent to the FBI. Not sure how that one happened, other than the judge lied to my face... But, I have the last laugh. They tried to suspend my license that had expired. Big 'ole middle finger to them. Somehow I don't constantly complain about it though, which is very much in my nature.

  64. Re:Excellent by eclectic4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I fear a state of mind that makes living freely and happily quite cumbersome. I myself will side with the hundreds of thousands of Americans that have died protecting these rights and will accept a certain level of uncertainty pertaining to "terrorists", thank you very much...

    In other words, "Live free or die". For those that may want to reconstruct this sentiment to form something like "you will die OR live free", remember what that quote means. It means, "I would rather die than to NOT live free". And I would agree. You see, I am an American, and I understand what freedom means, and therefore when I see it being eroded for unseemly ends I must, in a working democracy that is, rise up and fight. It is my duty as an American, and as a patriot.

    Vote these bastards out of office... our freedom depends on it...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  65. The United States Empire by tireseas · · Score: 1, Troll

    Well at last the American public is beginning to wake up and smell the shit of a police state in the air!!! Whether or not they've allowed it to go on for too long and it is too late to reverse things (after all - anyone can say that it is destroyed and just tuck it under another layer of secrecy!!).

    Did the Americans think that the Total Information Awareness program was going to go away? Look at the discredited and felonous individual assigned to chair it all up!!! What about the Patriot Acts?? Did the Americans really think that was going to be in the best interests of "combatting" terrorism? After 9/11, it was heresy to say to an American that this might be a call to re-examine the US's foreign policy. Noam Chomsky has been an articulate and intelligent critic of the US's foreign (and increasingly domestic) policy for a good many years. What about Ralph Nader - he has shown himself to be one of the very few people in the political arena who has shown any integrity and the balls to stand up to major corporations AND be proven right and ultimately supported by the various legislature on emissions and vehicle safety!!!

    The WTC and Pentagon gets bombed (although, let's face it - there is a huge amount of controversy arising about all of that as well - check out From the Wilderness for example http://www.fromthewilderness.com/ for some rather disturbing articles and connections being made) and the American public goes into a passive lead-me-by-the-hand stupor. The Americans got ass-fucked when they weren't looking and because of the primacy of the US in real politik, the rest of the world is going to slowly but surely get ass-fucked too. Yes the good old slut of a Blair government is also cowtowing to the Bush administration and apparently the UK has more CCTV cameras than any other country in the world. The UK is so paranoid about its own people it is driving a wedge between the public and itself just as the US is doing too. Guys - please - you must wake up here!!! Americans please look at what your country is doing - check out Vernon Coleman http:\\www.vernoncoleman.com - we do have to act, act together across the oceans and act sooner rather than later.

    Flame me if you must - but the writing is on the wall for the emergence of the kinds of Hollywood-style futures that no-one would ever want to live in. A police state, repressive, using great reams of code to control every person's movements and associations, to drip-feed a diet of drugs (TV, music, entertainment, games, movies, celebrity-suck, and happy distractions) while it continues full steam with its ECHELON system (http://mediafilter.org/caq/echelon/ ), which when confronted by the French the US government backed away and attempted to deny its very existence and has only released very broad details of its operation.

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs - it's a war on personal freedoms. Remember that!" ~ Bill Hicks
    1. Re:The United States Empire by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      I won't flame you, I promise. I would just rather reply.

      Sorry, but what you were used to in the past is LONG gone thanks to 9/11. America will never be the same. With our open border policy, it was only a matter of time before something like that happened. And it will happen again.

      Political parties aside, I really doubt if Kerry gets into office, we'll see much if any change.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    2. Re:The United States Empire by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Dont worry, the open boarder policy is still in effect.

      Just look at all of the jobs leaving our boarders.

      Vote Bush out. Hes a wolf in sheeps clothing itching to erase the bill of rights.

      Its bad enough that the hipocracy in this country has contradicted the bill of rights through many ways over the years. BUT WHAT IS WORSE is this current administration's williningness to push that even further to the point of completely losing site of our countries beleifs. Toss in the fact that they beleive they are workers of GOD... well... well folks.... how could he be wrong?!

      Vote Kerry, Vote Nader.. Frankly i agree with the comment that Kerry may be no different. Thats why voted for Ralph last year. The two parties pony up to the same folks. We need someone who will uphold the bill of rights, seperate church from state, promote free speech on our airwaves and abolish the fcc.

      Vote these replican religious taliban goons out of the white house, senate and house. Watch Cspan. Pay attention. FUCK THE FCC.

      And frankly... Keep your fucking religion out of my life.

    3. Re:The United States Empire by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      So I guess you're overlooking the fact that its normal in a global economy. Look at all the jobs in the past that where insourcing from other countries? Where was the hatred of American's really losing jobs to foreigners then?

      And, I bet you didn't realize that with all those jobs going overseas to India, those Indian companies are having ACs installed by Carrier, Coke machines installed and water purification. Not to mention the Cisco networking equipment, Dell computers. And, guess what else? All those above company's are AMERICAN owned and operated. Which means more money for AMERICAN companies, meaning they hire more workers.

      Before you rant basic democratic slander, be sure you research it first. It just makes you look like a loser more than you really are.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    4. Re:The United States Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American CEO owned, and Chinese-operated!

    5. Re:The United States Empire by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      but those indian workers get around $5 a day. I guess that makes your American company theory look like a greed theory.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  66. Stop (in)breeding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bad for you.

  67. Well... by Kjella · · Score: 0

    How easy would it be to walk across the Canadian border, walk into a border-town theatre, and blow yourself up?

    Pretty easy, but I didn't think you hated the Canadians that much. OTOH I did see South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  68. TERRORISTS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are all terrorists if we disagree with authority... that is what they label people so they get their way.

    Info for the bots in the government to subpoena everyone on this page (lol)

    BOMBS, USA, TALIBAN, NUKES, OSAMA, TERRORIZE, PEOPLE, DEATH, DESTRUCTION 9-11, BUSH, GEORGE W, BOOM, AMONIUM NITRATE, AIRPLANES!!!!!

    hehehe... none of that was meant to scare people.

    I cant stand all this fear of terrorism... we are so fearful we will opt to lose our constitutional rights... :(

  69. Smell the Evil by Optical-i · · Score: 1

    The MATRIX system reeks of evil, just take a look at the URL:
    http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Mar/03112004/utah/14666 9.asp
    666!
    He's coming... he's coming. (insert random conspiracy theory about God, terrorists, aliens, UFO's, Roswell and JFK here)

  70. So You're Living in a Police State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the satirical piece of the same name by Stephen Colbert of the Daily Show.

  71. This world has gotten a whole lot scarrier. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Half of this country (America) is religiously driven to the point that 500 emails from angry mothers about a black womans tit on CBS dictates the future of our first amendment rights. Want proof? Ask Howard Stern... I hear he has plenty of it lately.

    The government is SO out of control right now that ANY powers like this do not belong in their hands.

    They have far too much power. Yes It is quite scary. The thought of biological/nuclear attacks... VERY scary. But the truth is... someone can fire them from across the ocean and hit us just as easily, IF NOT MORE than some rogue group of islamic dick bags TRYING to get a nuclear device.

    Its all scary. But right now i'm more concerned about our government than i am of Al Queda.

    Interesting that an Anti War protester was arrested yesterday. She's accused of being an Iraqi spy.

    She was paid by Iraq they say. If she's just a war protester does that really make her a spy?

    Perhaps she is a spy. I dont know. Hopefully there is more evidence than just receiving money from iraqis. That doesnt quite make anyone a spy.

    So how did they investigate this woman?

    This certainly is NOT the America i was born into during the 70s.

  72. Two words: Power creep by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Watch it get elegantly lifted out of her hands to someone more 'cooperative' quite soon. Or watch the restrictions get casually ignored. Or 'coordinated' with another branch. Information is power, and the government loves power.

    That's why they're playing every dirty trick in the book, and most rejected in editing to become "the most powerful man on earth" - US president. Which is the head of the power hungry leading other power hungry.

    Already most of the rest of the world, foes and allies alike think Americans are arrogant. Yet somehow there's this incredible belief that there's no way a small subset of Americans, a "power elite" would be arrogant not only to other nations, but to the common American. That they should rule in their place.

    Personally, I think the US could actually fall for the ultimate scam - I think the country could be run by a small junta, and still have the people believe they're in control. That has got to be the ultimate dictatorship, noone to rebel against, no need to oppress, because there is no opposition only sheep thinking they herd themselves.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  73. -100 Flamebait by lavalyn · · Score: 1

    For all the US citizens reading this - probably the majority of readers - why do you continue to live where you do? Doesn't this kind of information make you angry, or untrested? And have you asked yourselves, "is it worth staying where I am, without the freedoms that I once had, because I am paid well?"

    Hundred years ago, when the overlords continued to distrust the citizens, and impose their draconian rule, the people rose up and overthrown the ruling class.

    There are other places where a better set of freedoms exist, perhaps at the expense of a lower standard of living. But isn't that freedom worth it?

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    1. Re:-100 Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, before you incite everyone to revolution, maybe you ought to throw off your paper hat and overthrow your managers at McDonalds. Wake up and join the real world.

  74. This conversation actually took place by mkro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Freemason Grand Master: ...and we will call it Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange!
    Illuminatus Rex: Hm.. Mu.. Ant.. Te... Matie? MATIE? Didn't we decide to keep the Aussie division out this time?
    Freemason Grand Master: No, no, they are not in. Purely a coincidence.
    Paul W.: Well, it sounds a bit... dull.
    Illuminatus Rex: I agree. MATIE just will not work. Think of USA PATRIOT - Uniting and Strengthening - now that is a classic. Even TIA is better, even thought it is just a TLA. How are we going to keep people on their toes with MATIE? People should think of strength and cunning, not Foster's and dingos. We are not playing shadow government here!
    Alan G.: What if we change a few letters... uhm.. MATRIX?
    Illuminatus Rex: Eeexcellent.

    --
    I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    1. Re:This conversation actually took place by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      MATIE? Didn't we decide to keep the Aussie division out this time?
      MATIE is the pirate division. Arrr, matey. MATE, on the other hand, would be the Australians... mate.

      Although now my brain is trying to figure out what an Australian pirate would sound like.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  75. We're waiting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're waiting for November.

  76. Off topic, mods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what to do.

  77. All they need is one state (maybe not even that) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they check Washington DC, they will probably find 90% of whole worlds terrorists.

    Why wasts bandwidth??

  78. copy protected data bases/laws to defeate others. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Has anyone made the conection between this and the recent push to copywrite data bases? Once the government has all this information, they could copywrite it (it that law passes) then all you buisiness really beloong to us.

    I think there is more to play here too. Not only are they compiling the bigest way to look at abstract data out of context (reasons for going to war in iraq) they are also making this information vulnerable for attack. But what hapens when they are considered to be replicating someone elses database? Does the government all the suuden need to pay royalties or will companies need to pay the government.

    This might really be a clever scheeme to extract fee's from industry more than it is for security. By all means i think it is a problem either way. There shouldn't be any information stored like that. It could also lead to post facto laws being interpreted.

    Lets say the political agenda is to make guns ileagle. Well with the second ammendment it will be a hard fought battle to succeed in that. But now what if the data shows that most everyone that purchased a firearm since the brady bill required the instant checks, also do some other common activity/thing. We can outlaw that activity then arrest and convict all of the gun owners of some fellony making it ileagle for them to own firearms again. This would have the same effect as making guns ileagle but, not by actually passing a law that might be challenge by a constitutional amendment.

    Now lets asuume it is something else that not politicaly corect with some group. SUVs, fast food, religion? can the list go on?

  79. This technology is so broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the misfortune of meeting some executives from Seisint (www.seisint.com), the company that built the MATRIX. I quite literally felt myself in need of a shower after the meeting. So appologies if I break into flaming at any point in this post.

    Seisint builds the engine as well as collects the data and loads it into their "data supercomputer" they then sell the data and access to queries against their "data supercomputer". This has been their business model for years, except prior to 9/11 they sold this server commercially.

    9/11 was a huge opportunity for them. These guy were boasting that after 9/11 they programmed a query against their existing database to assign a terrorist likelihood score to everybody in the US (their database was already pretty extensive). They ended up sending a list of the top few thousand to the government; their donation to the cause.

    In the meeting they demostrated their social networking chart. This thing was truly scary. They typed in my social security number and dispalyed a graph of everyone I was ever associated with including people I shared an apartment with for 6 months over 12 years ago. They could expand the graph out to as many degrees of associations as they wanted.

    Even more scary than the information they did find about me was the information they didn't find. I've never made and particular effort to hide my identity (yes I know I this posted anonymously), but they missed so much stuff. I can only imagine that anyone who made any kind of effort, could easily escape notice.

    In this meeting I was technically evaluating their software and I made the specific recommendation to my employer that based on the high potential for false negatives, as well as false positives, this was not a good technology. We didn't buy it.

    Now besided the fact that this technology just doesn't work. The other interesting side effect of the MATRIX is that it is making more data available in the public domain that Seisint can incorporate into their database own database, the one they sell commercially.

  80. Can someone tell me who saw the Matrix movies... by benjcurry · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me who saw the Matrix movies and said, "Hay, that's a good idea!"

  81. Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clearing that up. Now please upload your transcript to your Slashdot journal, where we can keep an eye on you. For your own safety and protection.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Read what I said again.

      You aren't a legitimate authorty asking a specific question, so "no." (Same as if you wanted to get my phone records from Verizon.)

      And in addition to that, I merely noted it as a way to avoid suspicion of terrorism. Being a white married christian male, I actually have confidence in my government to figure out that I'm not a terrorist--and if they happen to have questions, I'd be more than willing to answer them if they ask me.

      I'm not saying have a log that you give police at the drop of a hat. I'm saying have a systematic record-keeping system (preferrably passive/silent and double-checked) if you're scared of wrongful allegations of terrorism.

    2. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Upon being asked if you are a terrorist, make relevant portions of this record avaliable."

      I read your post right the first time - you just made up that "legitimate authority" requirement when you saw how flimsy your proposal looks. Who's a "legitimate authority"? That's not for you, a private citizen, to decide. The courts already have lots of ways to extract your life record from you, based on due process. And that "white married christian male" fetish you've got tends to protect Aryan Nation people from scrutiny, too, now doesn't it? I don't know why you've got any complaints at all with the current procedures, given your apparent satisfaction with faith based government.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      you just made up that "legitimate authority" requirement

      No, it was impled. You could also read "legitimate authority" as "someone whom I care whether or not they consider myself a terrorist."

      And that "white married christian male" fetish you've got tends to protect Aryan Nation people from scrutiny, too, now doesn't it?

      Yes, actually. No member of the Aryan nation gets accused of being a member of Al Quaeda--and I haven't heard much out of them in the last two and a half years.

      I don't know why you've got any complaints at all with the current procedures, given your apparent satisfaction with faith based government.

      Sheesh. Go ahead and indulge in name calling; it really makes me believe your arugment.

      And yes, I am confident in our opposition-based argument-based system of government. If you aren't, then why are you wasting time on Slashdot and not busily leaving this country?

    4. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't hear any arguments coming out of you when some undefined "legitimate authority" might want your transcript. And your faith in the government protecting your best interests means you might be reading this for the first time:

      "First they came for the Jews
      and I did not speak out -- because I was not a Jew.

      Then they came for the communists
      and I did not speak out -- because I was not a communist.

      Then they came for the trade unionists
      and I did not speak out -- because I was not a trade unionist.

      Then they came for me --
      and by then there was no one left to speak out for me."

      - Pastor Martin Niemoller
      http://www.serendipity.li/cda/niemoll.html

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I don't hear any arguments coming out of you when some undefined "legitimate authority" might want your transcript.

      Care to elaborate on that?

      It's not a simple question. A man in a suit walking up to me and asking where I was at 1800 on 2/15/04 is likely part of a police search, and there isn't a good reason not to asnwer--I don't even have to look at the log, just answer as best I can with notes on how well I remember. If the same man asks slightly different questions a few dozen times, then I get suspicious, get out the record, and decide if it's time to call my lawyer for advice.

      (In fact, that's the answer to most run-ins with "THEY". Measure if it's worth the call to a lawyer, and respond accordingly.)

      And your faith in the government protecting your best interests means you might be reading this for the first time:

      Now, you're raising a different point, and trying to argue them both.

      I am well aware that government authority needs to be checked by civilian examination, and that the only thing keeping us from becoming a tyranny is vibrant democracy.

      Now, what part of keeping a total log of your life (which, again, I'm only suggesting for those of you who don't trust the government but aren't leaving the country) keeps you from speaking out and participating in the democratic process?

    6. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      As long as you're implying convenient necessary details, I'll take issue with your implication that I should keep a log of my life, for checking by the gestapo whenever they need to see "my papers", in order to keep you safe, because you've never done anything you value as private.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      As long as you're implying convenient necessary details, I'll take issue with your implication that I should keep a log of my life, for checking by the gestapo whenever they need to see "my papers", in order to keep you safe, because you've never done anything you value as private.

      Where exactly did I imply that?

      In fact, if you're worried about "The Gestapo" a total information log is MORE important, not less. Not because you want to hand it over to them, but because you want to have a legally admissable proof for when they try and frame you.

      Being ignorant of your own life, or not keeing any record or heritage at all out of sheer orwellian paranoia, is not going to make your life better, this country better, or your children or my children our our children's children ANY safer from tyranny or terrorism.

      You're worried about tyranny? Then speak out when you see something wrong, and keep a record of EVERYTHING so they can't silence you because you're too much of a coward to let your mother know that you watch porn.

      Nothing sickens me more than a hypocritical slashdotter who's so much of an ignorant luddite that they think they have any privacy at all. T.H.E.Y. can read your e-mail, they can follow your every move, and they can keep a total and compelte record of every second of your life.

      And, seeing as how THEY can do all this--why don't you have one so they can't sneak in a few lies with their complete inundation of facts? Or is it just easier to bitch and complain and deny the rest of us security and convenience so you can speed all the time and buy a dime-bag to get high.

    8. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Upon being asked if you are a terrorist, make relevant portions of this record avaliable.

      I'll defend my country, the one where we're innocent until proven guilty, with everything I've got - and you've got, too, if that's what it takes. The transcripts are not the issue. It's your eagerness to hand them over to anyone who accuses you that destroys your freedom. Enough people going along with the intimidation, and I'll never be able to defend that right to innocence. And you've already given it up. Just ask the women who've had legal abortions to protect their lives in the past few years, whose medical records are under subpoena by Ashcroft's "Justice" Department, about how that transcript is keeping them safe from persecution. Ask the Continental Congress about the first Americans, whose colonial lives were subject to the kinds of invasions they created the 4th Amendment, privacy in our personal effects, to permanently end. Ask the McCarthy "Communists" whose careers, not to mention their political freedoms, were destroyed by those in pursuit of their transcript. And ask your children, or their children, who might do something unpopular, whether they want to surrender their privacy. The unexamined life is not worth living, but that value decision is ours to make of our own lives, not some "authority" with unchecked access to probe our private lives.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I'll defend my country, the one where we're innocent until proven guilty

      Stop.

      This isn't about defending our country or "innocent until proven guilty."

      This is about having a recourse for when you're accused. Becasue if you can't prove that you're NOT guilty, then you have an unfair chance of being found guilty wrongly. Not to mention the punishment of having to go through a trial at all when you didn't do anything wrong.

      Enough people going along with the intimidation, and I'll never be able to defend that right to innocence.

      Get off your high horse and stop the straw-grasping comparisons to people who really did suffer.

      You either trust our system of government or you don't. If you do, then accounting for your actions in a fair court of law and before officers of the law is a good thing. If you don't, then having a record in case the crooked government tries to railroad you is still a good thing.

      Ask the Continental Congress about the first Americans, whose colonial lives were subject to the kinds of invasions they created the 4th Amendment

      Yes, which creates due Process, and a systematic method both for fair searches and appeas of what you feel to be unfair one. They did not give carte blanche to criminal behavior to hide behind "privacy"--nor did they make privacy an absolute right, merely something that the government had to justify removing.

      Oh, and that 4th amendment you quoted? Try reading it.

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      It says "secure", not "involate." It says "against unreasonable", not "at all costs."

      And by anyone's standard, fierce nondefiance is enough to turn whatever coincidence they have into probable cause. Investigators don't have the time to just make up allegations--and if they do, then you want to keep a record of that, anyway.

      Ask the McCarthy "Communists" whose careers, not to mention their political freedoms, were destroyed by those in pursuit of their transcript.

      McCarthyism is freaking annoying on two levels. First off, it's a horrible overreaction to a real threat.

      Secondly, there were a bunch of cowards who didn't have the courage to stand up and tell the truth.

      And ask your children, or their children, who might do something unpopular, whether they want to surrender their privacy.

      Again with the presumption that we have privacy at all, or that we have ever had privacy. The closest thing we get is having a limit on what the government will publicly say or sieze, and a presumption of such in our own homes. (And, if you hadn't jumped on the "information bad!" routine, you might have noticed that I didn't include "things done at home" on the list of what to keep.)

      The unexamined life is not worth living, but that value decision is ours to make of our own lives, not some "authority" with unchecked access to probe our private lives.

      I'm begining to question whether or not you're a troll.

      Who exactly are you so afraid of? Homeland Security? FBI? The UN?

      Each body who could concievably care about what you do has checks on it. And if you keep your own detailed records, YOU get to be a check on it, too. It's not like I'm telling you to call the police station whenever you go anywhere, or volunteer to wear a house-arrest ankle braclet.

      It's your eagerness to hand them over to anyone who accuses you that destroys your freedom.

      This is the root of the issue.

      "Freedom" does not give you the right do to whatever the hell you please and damn the consequences. Freedom is the right to make your choices, and suffer or enjoy the cons

    10. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      How about James Yee's transcript?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      You mean James Yee, an Army chaplain...

      He signed up to be part of the military. In exchange for glory, revereance, and the thanks of his country, James Yee subjected every minute of his life to scrutiny.

      That wouldn't be a good comparison even if the charges were implausible--and they hardly are.

    12. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "Implausible"? Look, you're throwing away the right of the accused to keep the burden of proof on their accuser. "Implausible" is not the basis for jurisprudence, just in the media. I bet Yee is really wallowing in the glory, reverence and thanks of his country now, especially now that that transcript is used to persecute him for being a pain in the ass "enemy nonguilty". Justice does not exist merely to protect the "innocent", it protects all of us from pinning the consequences on the wrong person, for specific acts. Rounding up the usual suspects, who are "guilty of something" is a great travesty of justice, for the accused, those guilty but ignored, and the victims, past and future.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Thanks for volunteering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Look, you're throwing away the right of the accused to keep the burden of proof on their accuser.

      No, I'm not.

      Go find the point where I said that the keeper of a "this is what I did" list gives up the right to decide when and where to note it. You can't, because I never said that.

      YOU are the one who is throwing away rights--like the right of someone to quietly cooperate with a legitimate authority without feeling like they colloabrating in some orwellian dictatorship.

      "Implausible" is not the basis for jurisprudence, just in the media. I bet Yee is really wallowing in the glory, reverence and thanks of his country now, especially now that that transcript is used to persecute him for being a pain in the ass "enemy nonguilty".

      Yee gets the same benefits that Benedict Arnold, John Kerry, John Kennedy, and George Bush got. If he forgot them and betrayed his country, then he SHOULD be brought to justice--and it's a travesty to abuse the presumption of privacy to keep a criminal free.

      Justice does not exist merely to protect the "innocent", it protects all of us from pinning the consequences on the wrong person, for specific acts.

      Uhm, no.

      Justice isn't a force, it's a state. "Justice" doesn't do jack to keep the innocent out of prison--justice is keeping the innocent out of prison and putting the gulity in there.

      And if you're not willing to be wrong, ever, then you had better either agree to get rid of privacy, or find some better way to do things. Because the occasional miscarriage of justice is one of the downsides in our system of government and commerce.

  82. Amen, my fellow TRUE patriot. by The+Queen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love the America that you represent. Currently we are a minority in our own country. I hope the pendulum does swing back soon, because moving to europe is gonna be a pain. ;-)

    Please read this: http://holophrastic.com/javascopes/september_02.ph p and know that some of us are awake and give a sh*t.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  83. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And vote who in?. They are all mirror images of each other. What working democracy??.

  84. Marketing by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "CPTDP"? Nobody'd fund that.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  85. Canada has open border, but no problem. by Kiyooka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It wasn't just the open border policy. What was more important was US government intervention in other countries' affairs. I mean, the CIA don't exactly twiddle their thumbs all day! In one of the Dalai Lama's books, he mentions that the CIA were involved in his run to India, and that was decades ago on the other side of the world in the Himalayan mountains in Tibet, ferchrissakes! Can you imagine what the CIA are like now? What amazes and scares me the most is that today people have stopped demanding to know why and just accept the fact that it happened because those "middle easterners are evil terrorists". But WHY? WHAT ARE THEY DYING FOR? All I ever hear is that "those godless savages and fundamentalists hate freedom, that's all". C'mon people, keep questioning!!! 3000 people dead. What is going on behind our backs?

    1. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      We get involved with other countries either because we were asked or for our own personal gain. What the CIA was thinking in the 60s and 70s, who knows.

      I don't even think the CIA even has checks and balances by Congress. Reminds me of Hoover's FBI.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    2. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by Kiyooka · · Score: 1
      We get involved with other countries either because we were asked or for our own personal gain. What the CIA was thinking in the 60s and 70s, who knows.

      If that were the case, why would people be willing to sacrifice themselves to kill thousands of innocents in the US? Bush's gov't has only told us "because that area of the earth is populated with nothing but evil godless fundamentalists and terrorists who hate freedom and like to kill people and don't value their own lives". But people have stopped asking why. No offense, but notice that you just avoided the topic as well. The topic of discussion almost changed to only CIA, but the question here *still* is: why did the Alqaida do what they did on 9-11?

      I don't even think the CIA even has checks and balances by Congress. Reminds me of Hoover's FBI.

      I didn't know that. That worries me even more. How much more invisible can they get?

    3. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      why did the Alqaida do what they did on 9-11?

      Why do you think Al-Qaeda attacked the U.S.? Obviously, America is meddlesome as hell, but there are many who would oppose America's not being meddlesome, not using its power to better the world. Or something. You have the neo-cons who want to see America enforce democracy throughout the world and you have some leftists who want to see America assist other countries, but only if it is a left-leaning president who is in power.

      The UN needs to get its shit together, obviously, because when you have Libya chairing the Human Rights Commission, there's a problem. The UN cannot be taken seriously until they show that they are willing to punish those who do not afford their people an outlet through which they can voice their will. Non-democratic nations should not have leaders have the opportunity to participate in an institution that operates through democratic means.

    4. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      No matter what we do, that area of the world will always hate us. We can get down on our knees and give them what they want, and they will still hate us. That's the point people don't understand.

      I think the UN needs to be disbanded. It really does nothing at all. They slap the wrists of countries over and over again. That's it.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    5. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

      The answer to your question is, they attacked us because they hate us. Simple, straight to the point. No matter what we do, that area of the world will ALWAYS hate us regardless of who is president.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    6. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      Well of course. I understand quite clearly that America can never make the rest of the world happy. I'm not entirely sure what that is about, either. I lived in Europe and saw an incredible amount of anti-American sentiment. However, that sentiment was rooted in America's decision to go to war with Iraq and according to some, at one time, their seeming endorsement in the UK of the IRA.

      It is my opinion that the only way that Europe is going to have a positive opinion of the U.S. is if we get a left-leaning president. Europe identifies with socialism. Where I lived, they loved Bill Clinton and thought he was fantastic. However, none of them had anything to say about Bill Clinton launching missiles into Iraq during his time as president. They didn't care, as long as there was a liberal president in power.

      I am not conservative by the way. I am probably most accurately described as a liberal, but this is an observation based on my experience.

    7. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      It is my opinion that the only way that Europe is going to have a positive opinion of the U.S. is if we get a left-leaning president. Europe identifies with socialism.

      So we should elected a president regardless of issues to simply appease Europeans?

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    8. Re:Canada has open border, but no problem. by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

      Of course not. I was just providing a prediction based on my observations. Not an endorsement of a candidate simply because Europe would like him better.

  86. good points by Damned · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would also assert that this "if you don't like it, leave" mentality is unAmerican. The proper attitude should be "if you don't like it, vote and change it." Certainly, if there were a mass exodous of citizens from the country, that would change things because there would be not enough workforce to keep the infrastructure running. However, short of that mass exodous, leaving the country will not change anything. Voting, however, has changed much.

    For all those people who love to say "if you don't like it here, leave," I'm considering turning them in to homeland security as terrorists because they are trying to undermine the American way. I'm not going to do it, but it's a fun idea.

    --
    "I swear I won't break you if you let me take you where the willows never weep" -- Switchblade Symphony
  87. quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.

    - Benjamin Franklin

  88. HUGE target for hacking? by incom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine a succesful hack capable of sending everyone you don't like straight to gautanamo without any legal access or rights for them? Anyone with the skillz, would you mind altering Darl Mcbride's records?

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    1. Re:HUGE target for hacking? by Grrr · · Score: 1

      Very good point. Thanks.

      What a thoroughly rotten assortment of potentialities...

      ("It's not the odds, it's the stakes")

      <grrr>

  89. FBI in broadband wiretap? by tireseas · · Score: 0

    Anyone seen this yet? http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5172719.html?part= rss&tag=feed&subj=news

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs - it's a war on personal freedoms. Remember that!" ~ Bill Hicks
  90. adding is only harder than percentages! by Comsn · · Score: 1

    That data include four states' criminal histories, 33 states' correctional data, sexual-offender lists from 27 states, driver licenses from 15 states and motor-vehicle registrations from 13.
    "We're probably talking about 90 percent of the country," said Calbrese.


    33/50
    27/50
    15/50
    13/50
    -----
    88/200 (about 44 percent)

    anyways... matrix is a bad idea, just think about keanu reeves trying to act!
    1. Re:adding is only harder than percentages! by Comsn · · Score: 1
      That data include four states' criminal histories, 33 states' correctional data, sexual-offender lists from 27 states, driver licenses from 15 states and motor-vehicle registrations from 13.
      "We're probably talking about 90 percent of the country," said Calbrese.


      4/50
      33/50
      27/50
      15/50
      13/50
      -----
      92/250 (about 36%)

      yeah, then i miss that four! damn. the matrix is a bad idea... just ignore that first post i made.

      what do you mean its in the database already? what do you mean you cant edit posts!? its incorrect! aieeee
    2. Re:adding is only harder than percentages! by Halthar · · Score: 1

      One problem. There isn't a uniform distribution of population amongst all the states, they may have gotten data from all the most populated states. They more than likely dont have all the information on anyone, but may have enough that they have snippets of information on 90 percent of the population.

      That having been said, I really doubt the 90 percent figure, but I would bet that there are snippets of data for over 50 percent.

  91. Carnivore anyone? by camusflage · · Score: 1

    Just remember the rechristened DCS-1000's former name, Carnivore.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  92. Expunge by phorm · · Score: 1

    I'd expect that it was "expunged" from a criminal record, but not a general one. That is to say, an employer looking you up wouldn't find it etc, but if you got charged on a similar charge later the cops could.

  93. Shouldn't that be "room 100 department"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's where it belongs, anyway.

  94. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check this troll's history. Every single one of his posts links to an unrelated story at aittimes.mithuro.com for what I'm sure is ad-revenue generation of some sort, whether ads appear directly on that site or not. He's trying to up his impressions, the twat.

  95. He should have gone after the State Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't swing a dead cat in there without hittin' Real Commies still can't today either.More fuckin' Communists than on a US College Liberal Arts Faculty.

  96. Not just US by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I can't think of any "first world" country that I can't say the same thing about.

  97. oh bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If she wouldn't implement the requirements of the government and had the temerity as an employee to tell them to back off then they would have sacked her.
    Anyway is she Indian?

  98. Re:Excellent by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

    #1. Good question.

    #2. I agree

    #3. Er, I meant this polyarchy.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  99. Re:Excellent by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
    You're taking a big leap of faith here if you're suggesting that the liberty/safety trade-off is real. Under Hitler, Stalin and Mao, nobody was safe. Don't expect any better here if we hand absolute power to Bush and his minions (or anyone else, for that matter).

    Well, of course. It's always expected that someone will say that only the people who have something to hide will be concerned about these measures. The American people will probably readily give up their freedoms for the belief that they will be safer. It's already happening now and I don't expect that to change.

    Between the fear-mongering of the U.S. media and Bush's capitalizing on the 9/11 tragedy (which is to be expected under purely political reasoning), there are a lot of people who are scared shitless, or simply indifferent.

  100. That's a foolish argument. by Natestradamus · · Score: 1
    People choose to over-eat and not exercise, they did not choose to be slaughtered by terrorists. Besides, what did you want done about obesity? Mandatory gym sessions? Hard caps on how much people can buy at the grocery store? Should Weight Watchers be given law enforcement powers?

    Think before you post next time.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. --Edmund Burke
    1. Re:That's a foolish argument. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good idea. We need a fat bustin' vigilante force. If they don't lose it themselves we'll try and get it out of their system by the vibration of our tasers on their blubber.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  101. Re:Excellent by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

    Mmm..Political stagnation! My favorite. I like it with a bit of ketchup on the side.

  102. My favorite defense.. by Ath · · Score: 1

    Whenever government employees defend such programs, they often use the argument that most of this data is available on the open market anyway.

    Is it just me, or does that make it worse and not better?

    And when did someone establish a link between convicted sex offenders and terrorists? The truth is, there is a wide range of people who are just using the events of 9/11 to do a secret power grab. And eventually (hopefully by January of 2004), there will be someone in the Presidency who wants to reveal all this crap to show what the hell these people were secretly doing.

    For the former Governor of Utah to refuse to even discuss what he authorized with the current governor is so plainly obnoxious, I cannot believe more people are not outraged by it.