Slashdot Mirror


Verizon's NYC 911 System Shutdown

Dead Nancy writes "A combination of human error and software that didn't anticipate it brought down New York City's 911 emergency line for several hours on Friday night."

346 comments

  1. interesting name... by narzy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    dead nancy

    I wonder what the effects were, if anyone was seriously dead due to the matter.

    1. Re:interesting name... by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, but I heard that someone was moderately dead due to the matter.

      And someone else was partially pregnant.

    2. Re:interesting name... by JonLatane · · Score: 0
      I wonder what the effects were, if anyone was seriously dead due to the matter.
      Well, I don't recall ever seeing anyone humorously dead. ;)
    3. Re:interesting name... by CallMeCal · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Let's hope nobody wound up failing to get emergency services as a result.

      My wife,daughter and I happened to be wandering around Brooklyn during the outage. We noticed an increase in the number of uniformed officers on the street. This made us slightly nervous in a 9/11 (not a 911) sort of way. It wasn't until we read Saturday's NYT that we realized what was up. To increase visibility during the outage, NYPD had ordered all plainclothes officers to put on uniforms.

      As we strolled through some of the city's busiest commercial sectors, everybody as oblivious as we were.

    4. Re:interesting name... by Fancia · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well, there's mostly dead, and then there's completely dead.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    5. Re:interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, I don't recall ever seeing anyone humorously dead. ;)

      Never read any of the darwin awards then, have you...

    6. Re:interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there a difference between seriously dead and casually dead? :P

    7. Re:interesting name... by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Naw you've got it all wrong. People can be Decidedly Dead, Partially Petrified, or Predominantly Pregnant - all three of which occurred due to the NYC 911 outage.

    8. Re:interesting name... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Let's hope nobody wound up failing to get emergency services as a result.

      You dont seriosuly believe that they managed to get everyone the help they needed. In a city as large as NYC there are non-stop calls to 911 and an outage such as this in any city would result in many people not getting the help they need.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  2. Quick! by mindaktiviti · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Quick! Give me the number for 911!" - Homer J. Simpson

    1. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To call the police, you push 911 then just tell 'em to bring an ambulance, or a "hearst" if you're gonna kill me.




      --Slingblade

    2. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt! Since he was a Stonecutter, Homer would know that the *real* number was 912.

    3. Re:Quick! by SirPhreak · · Score: 1

      You mean Homer "Jay" Simpson.

      --
      ------------------------------ SirPhreak - "It's Thinking..."
    4. Re:Quick! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn, where is the 11 button!

    5. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      912 is the area code for Jekyll Island, GA... which is where the Federal Reserve was thought up.

      [cue Twilight Zone music] -- doo doo doo doo ... doo doo doo doo

    6. Re:Quick! by juglugs · · Score: 1

      No, erm..Sorry you got the wrong number - This is 91..erm...2!

      --
      This sig is in Spanish when you're not looking....
    7. Re:Quick! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Wow, from a Simpson's quote to an Empty Nest quote. What's happening to /. these days?

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:Quick! by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      And by "hearst" you mean "hearse"?

    9. Re:Quick! by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm...an accidental simpsons reference.

      912 = "Real" emergency number from the Stonecutters episode

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    10. Re:Quick! by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      d'oh.....realized it was a non-accidental reference to a different episode.....

      oops... /me goes back to watching Simpsons DVDs

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    11. Re:Quick! by jrp2 · · Score: 1

      We're sorry, but the number you have dialed, 9-1-1, is no longer in service. Please check the number and try your call again.

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
    12. Re:Quick! by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      J. is the initial for Jay... loser =)

    13. Re:Quick! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damn, where is the 11 button!

      That's not as much of a joke as it appears at first glance. Emergency service instructors (like the people who give fire drills in schools and such) always refer to 911 as nine-one-one, not nine-eleven for just that reason.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    14. Re:Quick! by vrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well they should stop doing so - for the good of society. Anyone who can't figure out how to dial 911 on a normal telephone keypad deserves to burn to death for being such a retard.

      Remember, everytime a stupid person dies the average intelligence of the world goes up.

    15. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you dial 911 an airplane flies into a building.

    16. Re:Quick! by pAnkRat · · Score: 1

      Butthead: I'm chocking,....
      Beavis: Yeah, .. on chicken, hmhhmmhmmm!
      chockin' on chicken,... hhmhehehh!
      You're chocking your chicken!
      Buthead: callhh, nine one one....
      Beavis: you call, you're closer.
      Butthead: you're closer asswipe!
      call nine one one!
      Beavis: Ok, What nuber shall I call!
      Butthead: nine,... one,... one
      Beavis: What number!

      --
      we need an "-1 Plain wrong" moderation option!
    17. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's also what the nazis thought, go on thinking like that, and you could kill any group of people just on the account that they are lesser than you.

    18. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well they should stop doing so - for the good of society. Anyone who can't figure out how to dial 911 on a normal telephone keypad deserves to burn to death for being such a retard.

      Remember, everytime a stupid person dies the average intelligence of the world goes up.

      Remember this next time you have a cardiac arrest and the only person with you is such a "retard" (if you have enough time, that is). He will live, you will die.

      Under stress situations everyone could have this problem, your brain may just stop working as it is overhauled by all the shocking information around you.
    19. Re:Quick! by thelenm · · Score: 1

      Of course, these days when someone says "nine-eleven" or "nine-one-one", chances are they're not even referring to emergency services, but rather to the events of September 11, 2001. Because some joker somewhere noticed that "September 11" => "9/11" => "911", and the news media keep propagating this stupidity. That's just what we need, more confusion about what 9-1-1 means.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    20. Re:Quick! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's good that people are refering to The Sept 11th attacks as 9-11, as I have noticed more poeple refer to the emergency service number as 9-1-1 and not 9-11 as they used to.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    21. Re:Quick! by mmclean · · Score: 1

      Well if we quickly implement a program to find all the "can't dial 911" retards and eliminate them from the world then the probablilities of being stuck with one of them at the exact moment of heart-attack go way down.

    22. Re:Quick! by slim-t · · Score: 1
      The AC copied and pasted from the Bible of movie knowledge. I've only seen the movie once, but I think it's right.

      To call the police, you push 911 then just tell 'em to bring an ambulance, or a "hearst" if you're gonna kill me.

    23. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, humor has no place on Slashdot any more.

  3. I see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arg, I got to call 911... /me picks up the phone and dials 911

    Do do do! The number you have dialed, Nine One One has been disconnected. Please check your number and try again.

    Crap!

  4. So.. by yetdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you think someone called 911 to report the emergency outage?

    1. Re:So.. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tried to call 911 to report the outage, but couldn't get through for some reason...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:So.. by dattaway · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must work in tech spport...

    3. Re:So.. by awtbfb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you think someone called 911 to report the emergency outage?

      Yeah, it went something like this: "911? Can you hear me now?"

    4. Re:So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I tried to call 911 to report the outage, but couldn't get through for some reason...

      At a guess, it's all the Slashdot monkeys, such as yourself, calling the number, just to see what happens.

  5. Re:Old News by Djarum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey I hadn't heard about this yet. I bet alot of other people havn't either.

  6. we KNOW what it was running by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    we KNOW what software it was running, right? ;)

    1. Re:we KNOW what it was running by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get over it...it was a "slashdot joke"
      (hey, what's /. with out a little MS bashing)

    2. Re:we KNOW what it was running by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that isn't a blatant misuse of "get over it", then I don't know what is!

    3. Re:we KNOW what it was running by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Funny

      "We've replaced these slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice the difference!"

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  7. conspiracy theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some boring NYC techie's wife is on the bottom of the river, sleeping forever.

  8. 311 by Frying+Ferret · · Score: 5, Informative

    well the calls were routed to 311, so the calls got answered, just maybe not as quickly. Yes this sucks, but the calls didn't go nowhere.

    1. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I the only one who has never heard of 311?

      I know about 411, but that's not a non-emergency number.

      Any other *11 numbers we should know about (and what do they do/where are they available?)

    2. Re:311 by Scorillo47 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the AT&T outages a decade ago...

      I presume that everybody here already read Bruce Sterling's piece:

      http://www.chriswaltrip.com/sterling/crack1j.htm l

      --
      Don't try to use the force. Do or do not, there is no try.
    3. Re:311 by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Only 80 calls went to 311 during the two-and-a-half hour outage. Countless (possibly hundreds) others just got a fast busy signal, recording or continuous ringing with no answer. My guess is the people who got 311 actually CALLED 311 because they couldn't get through to 911.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    4. Re:311 by i7dude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      well the calls were routed to 311, so the calls got answered, just maybe not as quickly. Yes this sucks, but the calls didn't go nowhere.

      I aint go no reason to doubt what you say.

      dude.

    5. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      311 is a number for non-emergency services in NYC. Don't know if it is deployed anyplace else.

    6. Re:311 by Nurseman · · Score: 4, Informative
      Am I the only one who has never heard of 311?

      In NYC 311 is used for Non Emergency calls. Noise, broken lights, etc. It has taken a tremendous load off of the 911 system. People used to call 911 for everything, I think the call volume is down 30- 40% since 311 went into effect.

      --
      Save a Life. Donate Blood. Please.
    7. Re:311 by allyourbasebelongtou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thanks for bringing up 311. I'm amazed at how few people even know about 311. It seems the public's adoption of 911 has to be 90%+, yet I bet the adoption of 311 has to be 10% or less.

      I recently sat on hold with 911 for literally 20 minutes after I watched a vehicular hit-and-run accident from my car, where the :cough: gentleman fleeing the scene looked around for a good 30 seconds to see if anyone noticed before making a break for it. (Read: he sped away.)

      Luckily I was close enough to get the a-hole's license number before he did, and ultimately I got thru, but wow am I glad it was just damage to another vehicle and that there were no injuries/fatalities.

      Also worth noting is that I was twice transferred to other divisions/operators after speaking with the first one.

      BTW, In case you're wondering it happened in the middle of broad daylight on a Saturday last Fall--not exactly "peak" 911 time.

      This has to make you wonder how many of those calls in front of me were BS, and why not allow people to route themselves based upon an automated menu system?

      Oh, you're calling about your neighbor's dog barking? We'll get back to you... eventually. Leave your number.
      -OR-
      Oh, you're on fire? No problem. I'll put you right through.

      --
      ----------
      Nope. Not gonna do it. Wouldn't be prudent. Not at this juncture.
    8. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you live in NYC or are just visiting you will see information for 311 in places like the subway, the bus, taxis, and billboards and what to call the number for unless of course you are using some ad blocker on your really cool glasses or you haven't left your apartment in the last 2 years (when I believe they rolled out 311).

    9. Re:311 by darkonc · · Score: 1

      I dunno where you live, but the last time I called 911, I was talking to an operator within about 15 seconds. (I live in Vancouver BC). I'd be willing to call a 30 minute wait obscene.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    10. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      I think the call volume is down 30- 40% since 311 went into effect.

      Sounds to me from this story that they've got call volume down 100% now. Good job!

    11. Re:311 by tylernt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nobody likes a tattle-tale. Mind your own business and quit trying to get other people in trouble.

      WTF? How would you feel if *your* car was the one damaged in a hit-and-run?

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    12. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why the hell did you call 911 for a hit and run without injuries or fatalities?

      Doesn't sound like much of an emergency to me.

    13. Re:311 by mvdw · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reminds me of that old story:

      Guy calls 911, saying "there's a burglar in my back shed, can you send someone over".

      911 operator: "sorry, all the officers are busy, you'll have to wait a half hour for a uniformed drive-by"

      Guy hangs up. Calls back 2 minutes later, saying "don't worry about sending the drive-by, I shot the burglar and he's dead"

      2 minutes later, 4 squad cars show up. Officers jump out, to startle the burglar in the middle of burgling.

      Officer says to home owner: "I thought you said you shot him!"

      Guy replies: "I thought you said you were busy!"

    14. Re:311 by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      For Regicide press 1

      If you know the name of the king or queen killed, please press 1 now...

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    15. Re:311 by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dunno where you live, but the last time I called 911, I was talking to an operator within about 15 seconds.

      We just recently (about a year ago) got 911 service here. Before that there were separate local phone numbers to call for police, ambulance, fire, what-have-you.

      Using the "old" system, I have over the course of time reported a couple of fires, a few burglaries/robberies, and a disoriented old lady to the appropriate emergency services. The fire emergency phone and the police emergency phone were always answered by a real person within two rings.

      I called 911 to report a burglary in progress across the street a couple of months back and got a recording when I called and had to wait on hold before someone got around to talkign to me.

      I find that completely unacceptable so I wrote a letter of complaint to our city council.

      Everyone else should do the same when that kind of thing occurs.

      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. it's the only thing that ever has.

      Your sig is appropriate here.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    16. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who has never heard of 311?

      You obviously have never been to New York. Not recently, anyway.

    17. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In much of the country, 211 is available as an information and referral service for human needs services and and volunteer services. Info at http://www.211.org

    18. Re:311 by boaworm · · Score: 1

      WTF? How would you feel if *your* car was the one damaged in a hit-and-run?

      FAR better than I would have felt if he had hit ME instead, I assure you that.
      And I think that was the point of the grand-parents post, trying to say that damage to fysical objects of this kind is not as time-critical as injuries to living beings.

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    19. Re:311 by nick0909 · · Score: 1

      If there is an immediate threat to life and/or property it is an emergency. The system is supposed to be built to handle the average load of such emergencies, and PSAPs (Public Safety Answering Point) are supposed to take them in a very short ammount of time.

      The problem is mainly when you call 911 from a cell phone you get a PSAP that is often not the one that covers the area you are currently in. In CA the CHP gets all cell 911 calls and then transfers them to the city/county fire/police once they figure out what the problem is. Then half the time the call is dropped and the other half they have to re-explain the problem to the new PSAP. Cell 911 is a big screw up so far, that is the main issue.

    20. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No 911 / 311 jokes please. I lost my father in the Madrid bombings you insensitive clot!

    21. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto for Chicago.

    22. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you know the name of the king or queen killed

      Jose Maria Aznar ?

      The frightening thing however, is that the terrorists will be doing it over and over again, after seeing how great it worked...

    23. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be a jerk, but you were contrubuting to the problem you're complaining about. 911 is for life and death emergencys ONLY. Call the local law enforcement dispatcher for petty shit like this. If no one's hurt, and no one's going to be hurt soon, leave 911 out of it.

    24. Re:311 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      311 is not implemented everywhere. Each state, and for that matter, each county within some states are all different in how they implement their emergency services.

  9. Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is a shining demonstration of why monopolies shouldn't be allowed to run the phone system. Speaking of monopolies, I wonder what the 'software' concerned was?

    1. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So instead when you call 911 you have a random chance of the software working? Yes, lets put small understaffed local companies in charge of the emergency phone system.

    2. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have a random chance of the software working?
      That's why you don't use M$ software. I think Linux may well have a good niche in this kind of market.

    3. Re:Monopolies and software by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      When the phone companies were truly a regulated monopoly (AT&T) you got *real* quality of service, plus an R&D organization that invented the laser, transistor and was awarded:
      • 6 Nobel Prizes in Physics shared by 11 scientists
      • 9 U.S. Medals of Science
      • 7 U.S. Medals of Technology
      • 1 Draper Prize
      • 6 Marconi International Fellowship Awards
      • 7 C&C Prizes shared by 12 scientists and engineers
      • 27 IEEE Medal of Honor winners
      Now I don't think monopolies are a good idea in the general case, however AT&T's results were at least halfway decent.
    4. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, it's a "bad news" article. So let's all figure out how Microsoft is responsible.

    5. Re:Monopolies and software by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a desirable situation, but better then it not working at all..

    6. Re:Monopolies and software by rabs · · Score: 1


      In fact, since this is such an essential service, should emergency services be run by the private sector at all?

      - rabs

    7. Re:Monopolies and software by smack_attack · · Score: 3, Funny

      We should outsource 911.

    8. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... I think the less gov't the better. I do understand what you are saying, but I think the private sector does a way more efficient job than the gov't.

      I am sure outsourcing 911 calls are on the horizon. :D

      <apu>Greetings! 911 emergency!

      *shiver* (side note, I don't think Apu was Indian, but his accent was the first best known voice I could portray).

    9. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if that doesn't take off, let's blame outsourcing and the combined efforts of the good-for-nothing programmers from India and China.

    10. Re:Monopolies and software by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, lets put small understaffed local companies in charge of the emergency phone system.

      Compared to a small, understaffed local government in charge of handling the actual calls? Why, we should give have Verizon take over that too and see how many people die as a result. Or maybe hand it over to a small company.

      Both sound ridiculous to me.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    11. Re:Monopolies and software by T-Ranger · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Man, this is slashdot. Point out some usefull things:

      • UNIX
      • C
      • C++ (well, ok, thats not usefull)
      • awk
      • Plan 9
    12. Re:Monopolies and software by rabs · · Score: 1


      True, I also am not a fan of Big Govt, either; but in this case, 911 seems to be such an integral part of emergency services that perhaps it'd be better to sacrifice some efficiency for consistency?

      - rabs

    13. Re:Monopolies and software by RealityMogul · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My Verizon phone service went out twice in the last month. Line was completely dead. I work 8-5 M-F. I called them when I got home which was around 6:00PM, I went to a payphone and informed them of the problem. Their response was, we'll send a technician out tomorrow. I asked what I was suppose to do if there was a medical emergency and I needed to dial 911. The person on the other end just went completely silent until I had to ask if she was still there. Obviously its too much to get a tech to come out after 4pm unless there's a major outage.

      Nice guys. I wish I had a heart attack just so I could file a lawsuit. That's the only way things change nowadays.

    14. Re:Monopolies and software by fodi · · Score: 0

      Hey, I can write Linux software that crashes as well as Windows software! For all we know their servers are still running (win or Linux)...

    15. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awk and Plan are more of a stretch than C++

    16. Re:Monopolies and software by jobugeek · · Score: 1

      ...and you rented your phone. The raping of consumers had to go somewhere.

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    17. Re:Monopolies and software by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Why does everybody have these knee-jerk reactions the *first* time anything happens? If we've gone this long without a problem, I'd say the current system works pretty darn good. If this was happening all the time, then you'd have a point, and it would be time for a change.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    18. Re:Monopolies and software by afidel · · Score: 1

      Besides which C++ wasn't invented at AT&T. It was mostly outside users who built up a set of object oriented preprocessor directives. Unfortunatly since preprocessors weren't well covered by the C standards the results of using these packages varied from compiler to compiler. Eventually there was enough evidence to show the utility of these packages and they were eventually codified into a formal language.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    19. Re:Monopolies and software by Sarth · · Score: 1
      If you're implying the typical anti-MS drivel..

      ... it should be pointed out that Microsoft used, at least at one point in time (haven't been to Redmond in a while) a phone system running off Linux.

      --

      ... and, so began, the legend of the Five-point Atkins Exploding Heart Technique!

    20. Re:Monopolies and software by ktakki · · Score: 3, Informative
      When the phone companies were truly a regulated monopoly (AT&T) you got *real* quality of service...

      I remember the "good ol' days" of Ma Bell's monopoly, before the big breakup. I'd take exception to the use of the phrase "*real* quality of service".

      The only good thing I recall about those days was that most Western Electric phones were virtually bulletproof, the telco equivalent of an IBM Type M keyboard. But that's about it.

      For starters, since the telco owned everything on the network, adding an extension phone was a violation of their terms of service, and they'd come down hard on you if they found one in use (and don't think they didn't check up on people; they did). The sound quality was vastly inferior to what we now have: long distance sounded like long distance, but even local calls could sometimes be rendered unintelligible by the monopoly's antiquated switching system. Service in rural areas pretty much sucked hind tit; even in the late '70s it was party lines or nothing in certain towns in upstate New York.

      Even worse, Ma Bell's responsiveness to consumer complaints was a national joke. Remember Lily Tomlin's character Ernestine? One ringy-dingy... That was a caricature, of course, but one grounded in truth.

      After divestiture, things really changed for the better overall. The relaxation of restrictions on what could be placed on the network meant a boom in devices like answering machines, fax machines, and modems. Had the old pre-1984 restrictions been in place, what do you think the effect would have been on BBSs and dial-up access to the Internet? Imagine having to pay extra in order to have a modem connected to your phone line. Sound quality improved largely due to technological advances, but had the monopoly still been in place, would there have been any incentive to upgrade the telco network?

      Yes, AT&T had been on the cutting edge of computer science and electronic engineering for decades. But had the break-up not taken place, we'd still be using a phone system worthy of the movie Brazil.

      k.
      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    21. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel the love!

    22. Re:Monopolies and software by Sanat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God forbid that you ever have a problem with a data line (higher quality line in those times) for the tech at AT&T would simply say that it was your equipment causing the problem and that their line check verified it. It was a monumental lesson in frustration.

      I ran a 10 state wide call center and the data processing branch of our company and dealing with AT&T was not easy even though we had nearly 100 lines with them. The customer service representives though at AT&T were outstanding, however they also had frustration in dealing with the repair group.

      When MCI lines arrived we switched and in doing so saved half of the expense and most of the problems encountered and all of the headaches.

      Competition lowered the price, improved quality, and made the company (especially the techs) more responsive.

      Breaking up AT&T was the best thing that ever happened to improve the telephone systems overall.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    23. Re:Monopolies and software by afidel · · Score: 1

      Um, read Stroustup's Design and Evolution of C++ and read up on C with Classes. Stroustup unquestionably was the lead architect of the modern C++ language, but he was not working in a vacume. Many of the ideas for C++ came from existing works and academic papers, not to mention interactions between Stroustrup and outside implementors.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    24. Re:Monopolies and software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bell's monopoly on telephone equipment was actually, IIRC, lifted in the early seventies, as a result of a different anti-monopoly agreement between AT&T and the government.

    25. Re:Monopolies and software by Moocowsia · · Score: 1

      You wish you had a heart attack? Without any way of phoning out? LOL. You'd be rolling in 6 feet of dirt, not cash.

      --
      Moo!
    26. Re:Monopolies and software by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Sounds a bit like BT with my ADSL line there - every time we phoned them up they'd say "We've checked the line and it's fine". Eventually we lost all phone connectivity for a week or so. :/

    27. Re:Monopolies and software by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't agree. An eventuality occurred which the original software designers hadn't thought of. This happens all the time in embedded systems - the world is not only more complicated than we think, it is more complicated than we can think.

      This failure required two failures in a row - one human, one software. After this failure, both systems will be fixed, so this failure won't happen again on this system. Furthermore, it won't happen again on any system those involved in cleaning up work on - we learn by our mistakes. Unfortunately, because they appear to be going to keep the details secret, none of the rest of us will have chance to learn from their mistakes.

      This is nothing to do with monopolies. Any man-made system will hav failures. But it does have a bit to do with open/closed: if the system were open source, those interested would see the fixes even if they dsidn't get a complete report (which they paobaly would). "Many eyballs" would have made this failure less likely (though not impossible). A case for wanting open source in safety criticasl software: maximise the clooegiate understanding.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    28. Re:Monopolies and software by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      So instead when you call 911 you have a random chance of the software working? Yes, lets put small understaffed local companies in charge of the emergency phone system.

      Better yet, let's just outsource the whole mess to India! That'll improve service.

    29. Re:Monopolies and software by rabs · · Score: 1


      Except that we *haven't* gone this long without a problem. The article says that this is the second time in a year that there has been a *major* outage, and a Google search for 911 failure turns up even more.

      - rabs

    30. Re:Monopolies and software by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Prior to the breakup, at least for home users, there was no such thing as "your equipment". The phone company owned all of the infrastructure, the wiring and equipment. If there was a problem, they were right on top of it. 411 was free.

      I'm not saying the breakup didn't create some positive things. The competition for service has certainly pushed companies to lower costs and provide customers with a bargain. The loss, of course, was service. In order to truly compete, they now had to stop raw research, trim unprofitable activities (giving away their equipment to customers and ending all technical support beyond the line to your house), and concentrate on bringing the technology they had to customers at a price that could compete with others.

      How many technological advances have been made in telecommunications infrastructure since the breakup? DSL? How many were made in the years before?

      But again, I'm not necessarily saying either way was bad. It's certainly a trade-off. With the old way, high rates paid for stellar service and a major research investment. Today, we have competition, more jobs, low rates, but poor service and virtually no new research.

  10. NYTimes by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those who don't want to register:

    username: slashdot2003
    password: slashdot2003

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    1. Re:NYTimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe the google trick still works. goto www.google.com and enter the url for the search box then click the result

    2. Re:NYTimes by jacobdp · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem to work.

      username bogus
      password bogus

    3. Re:NYTimes by damiam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Posting login info in /. doesn't work, because some asshole always goes and changes the password.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:NYTimes by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 1, Redundant
      For those who don't want to register:

      username: slashdot2003
      password: slashdot2003
      "Couldn't find your Member ID or Password. Please re-enter them."
    5. Re:NYTimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only some asshole, but the SAME asshole, considering we sadly have that kind of people here.
      This login to everywere politic is really getting annoying. Asking to login for some places where you can actually interact / post / modify / whatever, can be understood as a mean to avoid abuse of the system, but to just enter a darn page doesn't make any sense. Not even using the paranoid 'they will sell your to ' doesn't make any sense, since everyone will lie in that kind of signups.

      --
      Moderators on crack = as an AC i get a higher starting score that with my (unfairly)-1ed account [GNUALMAFUERTE]

    6. Re:NYTimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just paste the url in google, then click on it, NYT sees the google referrer and lets you read it without logging in.

  11. It was a heist of great porportions. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 4, Funny

    You read stores like this and think, "Oh, it was just error."

    But you fail to realize that a big heist probably took place. I saw George Clooney and Matt Damon do it to Las Vegas. They let off this big ass EMP and shut down the power to the whole city! Long story short, they stole a shitload of money and got away with it.

    Don't let these stories fool you, that is exactly what happened here.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:It was a heist of great porportions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know what it was? They gave this rich uncle some ground up pills in his coffee and when he noticed problems, he went to call 911 and was forwarded to 311 and the longer responce time cost him his life!

    2. Re:It was a heist of great porportions. by challahc · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was Ashton Kutcher:

      "Hah hah ha dood you just got PUNKED!!!"
      "Oh, you're dead?"

      "I don't care, best punked ever"

      --
      01100010 01101001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101
    3. Re:It was a heist of great porportions. by jaydeejee · · Score: 1

      And now to figure out how they managed to transport 5 or so bags worth of call-girl flyers into the safe...

    4. Re:It was a heist of great porportions. by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Funny
      You read stores like this and think, "Oh, it was just error."

      But you fail to realize that a big heist probably took place. I saw George Clooney and Matt Damon do it to Las Vegas. They let off this big ass EMP and shut down the power to the whole city! Long story short, they stole a shitload of money and got away with it.

      Don't let these stories fool you, that is exactly what happened here.

      So I guess the people behind it are errorists, then?
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    5. Re:It was a heist of great porportions. by roye · · Score: 1

      They brought them in dressed as the SWAT team

    6. Re:It was a heist of great porportions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many of those billions of dollars of stuff that was under the World Trade Center buildings were stolen during the disaster on 9/11? Sounds like a good story, anyway.. travel back in time to just the right moment...

  12. Feh. by James+A.+M.+Joyce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And to think everyone was worrying about the terrorists, fer chrissakes.

    1. Re:Feh. by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wow. You're right - shurely the Department of Homeland security was meant to have made sure that vital infrastructure in the US is robust in the face of terrorist action, not just people being dumb.

      a Verizon spokesman, said the telephone company would now require a second person to double-check any entry of data that could affect the 911 system

      So, they've just announced to all the terrorists in the world - this problem still exists, is going to remain there and if any terrorist organisation can get one of their members on the inside, they'll be able to take the 911 lines down anytime they want. great.

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    2. Re:Feh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone would think that 911 is when the world ended. Only the US-centric world that is.

    3. Re:Feh. by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Heh... in order for this original flaw to be exploited, the terrorists would have to get their bad guy into a trusted position at Verizon. Now, they'll need to compromise two different people...

    4. Re:Feh. by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      No, they just have the one person make the change with out telling anyone. Same as before.

      It's not like they are changing it so they need to people to turn keys on opposite sides of the room, at exactly the same time...

    5. Re:Feh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The Spanish though that 311 was when the world ended...

  13. yah uhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    we could, uh, do without the, uhmmmm, simpsons quotes. especially if they have very little to do with the story.

    yeeeah, you'll be uh, getting that +5 funny regardless.

    1. Re:yah uhm by tylernt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Quick! Give me the number for 911!" - Homer J. Simpson

      we could, uh, do without the, uhmmmm, simpsons quotes. especially if they have very little to do with the story.

      Dude, the Simpsons quote was about 911... the article was about 911... and you say the quote has "very little" to do with the story? Ok, explain that please 'cuz I don't get it. :)

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  14. well.. by micronix1 · · Score: 0, Funny

    the real number is 912

    1. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, the real number is 112, for GSM phones.

  15. Re:Old News by Scoria · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd "call the wahmbulance," but 911 isn't currently available.

    (Are you new here?)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  16. Re:Old News by WhiteBandit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering Slashdot doesn't write their own articles and it is basically an aggregate of postings from other sites, I'm not sure what you're complaining about.

    Technically, any news on Slashdot is old news since it has been reported already. :P

  17. What *kind* of human error? by siliconbunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was it a "what does this little red button do?", or a misconfiguration somewhere by a sleep-deprived sysop at 3am?

  18. do you need an account by SoupGuru · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    to get emergency services?

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  19. Full text (what happened to google partner links?) by oldosadmin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Verizon began taking steps yesterday to better protect New York City's 911 emergency line after a data error by an employee brought down the system in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island for about two hours on Friday night, city and Verizon officials said.

    The emergency system broke down about 7:20 p.m. after a Verizon engineer who was making service changes to a bank's telephone numbers in Brooklyn inadvertently included numbers that are used to carry 911 calls, city and telephone company officials said. The numbers were close in sequence, the officials said.

    The 911 calls then ended up being rerouted to the bank's phone system, and callers heard a busy signal. City and Verizon officials said that while the backup system in place for 911 was functioning properly, it failed to pick up the calls because it was designed to catch a technical error, not a human error that would be interpreted as simply a change of instruction.

    Daniel Diaz Zapata, a Verizon spokesman, said the telephone company would now require a second person to double-check any entry of data that could affect the 911 system, and said the company planned a thorough review of its procedures that would be documented in a report to the city within a few days.

    "We determined that a human error resulted in the accidental rerouting of phone calls during a procedure to upgrade service for a corporate client," Mr. Zapata said. "We have immediately altered our processes to ensure this type of situation does not reoccur. We have assured the city that we took immediate steps to make sure this doesn't happen again."

    Citing privacy concerns, Mr. Zapata declined to identify the Verizon engineer, except to say that he was a veteran of the company. Mr. Zapata said it was unlikely that disciplinary action would be taken against him.

    Police and fire officials said yesterday that they had no reports of injuries during the 911 failure. Fire officials said that about 60 firefighters responded to a major fire, at 3301 Foster Avenue in Brooklyn, which was called in at 8:49 p.m. by someone using a fire alarm box on the street. There were no injuries in the fire.

    Paul J. Browne, the Police Department's deputy commissioner for public information, said the department immediately adopted emergency procedures, like requiring e officers on patrol to turn on their flashing lights so people could find them easily and increasing staffing at precinct station houses to answer phone calls. But he said there was no reported increase in crime.

    "This didn't present an opportunity for the criminally minded - like the blackout did - because probably most people were unaware that it was out of service," he said.

    However, several City Council members expressed anger that the 911 system could have been so easily disabled, and called for creating a more effective backup procedure.

    "It's an emergency wakeup call," said Councilman Peter F. Vallone Jr., the chairman of the Public Safety Committee, who plans to hold a hearing about the incident. "We don't have an adequate backup system for 911, which is more important than ever as we fight the war against terrorism."

    Gino P. Menchini, the commissioner of the Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, said city officials were working with Verizon to ensure that the emergency system's numbers were clearly identified, and that its software and equipment were protected from similar human errors.

    But Mr. Menchini emphasized that the emergency system already had many built-in safeguards, such as the ability to route 911 calls through either of two central offices and their 911 answering centers. "The bottom line is, 911 works very well, and it's worked very well for a long time," Mr. Menchini said.

    Several emergency services experts agreed yesterday with Mr. Menchini, saying that New York 911 system compared favorably with those in other large cities and that an error like the one made by Verizon could not necessaril

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  20. double negative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the illiterate /. crowd has stumbled upon a valid use of the double negative.

    Although a better word would be "unanswered," nowhere will work

  21. What is 911s number again? by LabRat007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, I can't find the eleven....

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    1. Re:What is 911s number again? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You need a Spinal Tap phone, I guess...

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
  22. Google brings good to all by dan_polt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Non-reg link: here

  23. You got the wrong number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You got the wrong number, this is nine one...two"
    -Chief Wiggum

  24. Yeah, by pcmanjon · · Score: 0, Funny

    In other news, you could hook up a 220VAC generator to any telco box and effectivly take out your entire citys area code...

    It'd also take out any other area code as well, as long as it was directly connected using the same switching methods.... it'd just keep on going down the line...

    What would happen is everyones telephone would ring and ring and possibly be electrocuted if they weren't careful handling the phone...

    Not to mention anyone who was stripping their phone wiring with their teeth like I usually do when I have to strip phone wire! ;p

    A little off topic, but interesting non the less,..

    1. Re:Yeah, by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I don't think that would work so well nowadays, with fiber interlinks and service disconnects.

      But you could probably fry a neighborhood.

    2. Re:Yeah, by sahonen · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this was in the Anarchist's cookbook. I'd bet that the phone equipment can deal with it, otherwise we'd probably hear more about people doing this sort of thing. Unless nobody is actually stupid enough to try it (thank god).

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    3. Re:Yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit.

      It would be very difficult to take out ANY line except the one you're using. There's these things called FUSES that will stop this. At the most, such a charge will take out only what's connected to that specific 'telco box' you're zapping.

      Electrical current travels over copper, not fiber.. ;P

    4. Re:Yeah, by amaiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Been reading the "blotto box" chapter of the Jolly Roger cookbook? :-)

      Like most things in that book, they either don't work, or will probably cause you to kill yourself if you tried it.

      The phone company equipment would obviously have surge detection/supression systems in place to isolate any box that had something like that done to it.

      What'd be really funny is if a guy hooked one up and then went home and answered his phone...

    5. Re:Yeah, by Al-Hala · · Score: 1

      Unless they're antiquated enough to be using *real* switches (the mechanical kind) in the switching office, you'd be out of luck.

      Normal ring voltage is around 90 VAC, so there's a bit of leeway there (220 being a 200% overload), and very likely you'd fry an individual cct, which would protect the network from the juice.

    6. Re:Yeah, by and+by · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Won't work, even with antiquated mechanical switches. Phone lines are traditionally connected to lightning protectors to save the switches from (as if you couldn't have guessed) lightning strikes at endpoints. Usually the protectors were part of the frame where you run patches from switch ports to the actual cables that hold X pairs.

    7. Re:Yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In other news, you could hook up a 220VAC generator to any telco box and effectivly take out your entire citys area code...

      you have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about. you have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about. you have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about.

      are we clear?

      someday you should use this Internet thing to actually learn instead of posting stupidity.

      POTS (plain old telephone service), as implemented for the last 40 years, is completely immune to the sort of antics you suggest, for a variety of reasons. i suggest you look into the telecommunications equivalent of caveman level topics such as: line cross protection, digital-to-analog conversion, and virtual circuit switching.

      what a dumbass.

      AC and proud of it.

    8. Re:Yeah, by chrisbw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      </troll> please.

      And, ummm, stop reading Phrack from 1985.

      First off, these days, most lines are served off 'digital loop carriers (DLCs),' which take the analog lines from your home, and multiplex it onto high-capacity lines (often running over fiber-optic SONET loops) back to the central office.

      Even if your 220 volts made it back to the DLC (which is fairly unlikely, considering 220 VAC at any dangerous ampreage will probably overheat and melt the copper, anyway), the worst you'd do would be to burn out the service area the DLC is handling.

      And even if your unlikely scenerio of getting 220 VAC back to a central office, and through the fuses, and the main distribution frame, and even if you hit the switch, you wouldn't affect anything more than that local exchange. Central offices aren't "daisey chained" down copper lines.

      (and yes, I do work for a telco)

      --
      Chris -- http://www.bitter.net/
  25. Fear Fear Fear!! by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 1
    "Meanwhile, politicians are speaking out saying improvements need to be made to the emergency system."

    I don't have anything against making an emergency system more reliable or robust, but I just hate when everyone says that "something needs to get done to improve this" when something bad happened. In this case, if politicians knew of this ahead of time, why was something not done about it then??? My guess is that it's just a politically correct statement to make but the politicians just have no clue on how the system works.

    --
    DrkBr
    1. Re:Fear Fear Fear!! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      "Meanwhile, politicians are speaking out saying improvements need to be made to the emergency system."

      Oh boy. Looks like I'll bee seeing the face of Chuckee "Cheese" Schumer on the news tonight.

  26. I wonder whose switches they use? by luckytroll · · Score: 4, Informative

    I once built an HA cluster that had a role in the 911 system, at a major telco switch vendor. Apparently the fines for a vendor bungle in this are in the millions of dollars per minute of downtime. I dont know which switches these are, but such penalties could affect that vendor in fines and their bottom line. It looks like Verizon shot itself in the foot, but keep an eye out for a dip in share prices for some of the switch vendors in case the blame gets spread around.

    1. Re:I wonder whose switches they use? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      5ESS IIRC.

      But, it's still *human* error that led to the problems, not the type of switch.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:I wonder whose switches they use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, either a 5E or a DMS 100 (or the 100/200 tandem combo) - Verizon has lots of both.

      As a 100 design engineer for the last 10 years, I can say that this type of problem is very difficult to detect by software. Routing and translations datafill is highly decentralized with no interswitch communications to verify the impact of a single switch configuration change on the network as a whole. You gain a great deal of reliability with such a design but loose the ability for interswitch cross checking.

      One of the more interesting problems in this class is the 'translations loop'. This problem occurs between two offices, usually connected by a two-way trunk. A translations mistake on both ends cause incoming calls to be routed out the same incoming trunk. A single call can chew up all circuits on the trunk group in a matter of seconds - until the caller gets a 'all-circuits busy' treatment. They remain busy until the caller goes on hook. It's always fun to watch happen in the lab. (Why am I getting treatment? aww shit haha)

      I feel sorry for their technician. The tools he had available would not have detected this nor are any improved tools on the horizon.

    3. Re:I wonder whose switches they use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This switch was a Lucent 5ESS-Tandem there is something that is known as a Route index that was typoed and all of the traffic went to the wrong TG. A customer TG NOT the 911 TG like it was suppost to be! ooopsy!

    4. Re:I wonder whose switches they use? by can56 · · Score: 1

      Millions of dollars per minute of downtime add up pretty quick. Two hours @ 2 Mbucks/Minute equals 240 Mbucks. Ouch! It took years for microsoft to get that far in Europe.

  27. Not actually a 911 problem by iabervon · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 911 system seems to have continued to work correctly, but the regular numbers that calls to 911 get directed to were redirected to a bank. So the issue is really that there aren't safeguards against the wrong phone numbers getting changed accidentally, and the phone lines used by the 911 system aren't immune.

    Shouldn't the interface for the system prevent you from accidentally modifying similar but unrelated numbers when you're modifying a set of numbers?

    1. Re:Not actually a 911 problem by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the interface for the system prevent you from accidentally modifying similar but unrelated numbers when you're modifying a set of numbers?

      I suppose it could be done, but that adds a lot of code (and the increased chance of errors that goes along with that). How many conditions that may-or-may-not be legit or not do you want to test for?

      Usually whan a large change is being done it is scripted ahead of time, and the script file is audited by at least one other tech/engineer (at least where I work). The system does checks for syntax/format errors, but it doesn't check for logic errors in the instructions it is given. Or typos that happen to be in the correct format for a parameter.

      If you want to cause the switch to do something dangerous, and you give it the right commands in the right order (with the correct password authority) it will follow your instructions, just like any other computer.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  28. Doesn't work? My mistake by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    It doesn't work? My bad... it certainly worked before.

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  29. You're right. by Scoria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Verizon began taking steps yesterday to better protect New York City's 911 emergency line after a data error by an employee brought down the system in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island for about two hours on Friday night, city and Verizon officials said.

    Now imagine what a genuinely malevolent person could accomplish. Perhaps a single individual shouldn't be capable of disabling such a critical system.

    --
    Do you like German cars?
    1. Re:You're right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Indeed. You can bet someone got fired over this. I would hate to be that poor individual trying to apply for another job...

      Interviewer: Now, tell me again, what caused you to lose your position with Verizon?

      Interviewee: Uhhhhhh.... *nervous fidget*

    2. Re:You're right. by danharan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it's most likely the poor bloke whose typo caused the system to go down who will suffer, rather than the morons who designed such a brittle system.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    3. Re:You're right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the poor bloke is probably "union" and will suffer no reprecussions.

  30. Of Human Error and Metasystems by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This type of error is a classic problem of the computer assuming that the human was right. We create machines to give us power, but use that power to cavalierly.

    The idea of having a second person "double-check" is nice in theory, but I will wager that the second person will let errors through too. If the first person is careful, the second person is faced with a long list of matching, correct entries to check. The second person soon becomes fatigued and keeps hitting the "OK" button even when there is a discrepancy. Unless the second person is offered an outsized reward (and the first person is penalized by an even greater amount), its to easy to become apathetic or non-vigilant. (Also, the double-checking process assumes that the original set of command directives was correct).

    The real solution is a meta system that logs any changes to the system (like a config change), monitors dependencies of that change, and cross-checks them during exceptions. When an exception occurs, such as a bunch of 911 busy signals, the system would trace through the code and config files and correlate the fact that the onset of busy-911 calls corresponded with the insertion of the erroneous numbers. The system would then either roll-back the changes that caused a fault or alert someone of the list of likely culprits.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was thinking more of a system that would catch this sort of error in advance, rather than after the damage had already been done by a data-entry error.

      Consider:

      The changes you have entered will cause 911 calls to be routed to Citibank (or wherever) . Are you sure you want to commit the changes?

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    2. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system would then either roll-back the changes that caused a fault or alert someone of the list of likely culprits.

      A bug in the "meta system" and it rolls back to 1952's phone system. Sounds like fun.

    3. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by Unordained · · Score: 1

      Nono.

      The changes you have entered will cause 911 calls to be routed to Citibank. No.
      [OK]

    4. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by __aadhrk6380 · · Score: 1

      Funny that I have seen satellite commercials lately talking about cable companies being "piggish" when "SNORT" would work for a 911 system in a case like this. ;-)

    5. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like skynet?

    6. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical open source user. The button should obviously say "No."

    7. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Consider: The changes you have entered will cause 911 calls to be routed to Citibank (or wherever)

      Fine, but when you dial 911 (or any of the 3 digit short numbers, or any 1-800 type thing) the call is translated to a standard 7 digit number, and that number belongs to the 911 center. Actually it is the main number in a rotary group, but it could just as easily be any single phone (like on the sherrif's desk in Shelbyville).
      What appears to have happened in this case is that the 7 digit number for the bank was substituted for the 7 digit number for the 911 center. It could be as little as one digit difference.
      Depending on the telephone switch, it may have asked a generic "are you sure?" or it may have trusted that the human knows what he is doing (as the parent suggested).

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  31. This explains the can you hear me now? commercials by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    I always thought it was just an annoying phrase we were having drilled into our heads, but now we now the guy really has problems with Verizon service.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  32. Re:Doesn't work? My mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it did, but when they check their server logs and see 20,000 people logging in with the same username, they disable it

    Dont bother posting NYT usernames unless you create it specifically for the article, and even then it may stop working once enough people use it.

  33. Re:Still doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do you think I was waiting for it to ring?!

  34. Sometimes... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ....shit just happens. There are many more things that we could be busting on Verizon about than this....

  35. Re:Doesn't work? My mistake by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    there was the trick of adding the partner tag at the end of the url to avoid reg mentioned on other slashdot story earlier..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  36. The problem by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Informative

    is that there is a very finite number of customers for things like electricity and phone service. You need a very large customer base in order to be able to charge a reasonable amount.

    When you allow competition those that attempt to compete are forced to either charge less than it costs to supply the service or charge more. If they charge less but can't get the customer base they go out of business. If they charge more people tend not to switch. And if you don't charge enough less, nobody cares enough to switch.

    Cox saves us all of a buck or two over Qwest on phone service. We never bothered to switch until we switched to Cox for high speed internet.

    And of course the only reason Cox had the money to implement phone service is because they're the monopoly on cable service.

    In cases like this it's actually better for the government to force the monopoly to act in the best interest of the people than to allow competition which just gives people the false impression that it'll lead to cheaper prices and better service.

    Competition in these cases are almost always forced to either cut corners to survive or charge more.

    Ben

    1. Re:The problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a very large customer base in order to be able to charge a reasonable amount.

      Welcome to the 21st century. I can run a telco out of my garage that offers unlimited local service to 10 of my closest friends and all of my local family for about USD10/month/customer. It can also provide long distance for USD0.029/minute.

      I can peer my system with four or five other garage shops and get almost state-wide coverage without long distance.

      It doesn't take a large customer base to run a profitable telco. It takes de-regulation.

    2. Re:The problem by Tender+Vittles · · Score: 1

      Hell, look at what happened to us in California. They thought it was such a great idea to deregulate electricity services, and that totally screwed us over a few years ago. My bill went through the roof then.

    3. Re:The problem by danheskett · · Score: 1

      In fairness, California did not deregulate energy. They re-regulated it.

      How so?

      For one, in the "deregulation" bills themselves was $30B in direct and indirect payments to the 3 big utilities. This was an instant 30% increase in your power bill during the switchover. Essentailly power companies decided to spin off generation and distribution into two seperate organizations. However, since the power plants were massively indebted and expensive (mostly from bad investments in bad nuclear technology) they had to first be bailed (hence $30B).

      Second, thanks to price caps and price freezes designed to offset that 30%, the utilities who were local to California had to sell energy at a profit. Thanks to price caps, consumers had no need to consume, and demand increased without natural stops involved. Normally higher demand creates supply/demand pressure which increases prices which in turn forces downward pressure on demand. It's a cycle really. This was shot all to hell. Outside companies in Texas, Oregon, and Washington state decided, hey, let's sell power to California's distribution power companies. We can sell at a higher rate than in our own states. In fact, Texas and Oregon both scrapped rate increases for their customers thanks to the profits from California. In essence, California subsidized the costs of Oregon and Texas's power.

      Finally, thanks to a combination of political and economic factors, there was no significant increase in generating capacity despite a massively increased population base (California is and has been growing rapidly for a long time) and high demand. The supply was maxed out from in state sources. No new power generation facilities came online during the mess. When demand spiked due to cold weather or hot weather there was no extra in state supply. Meaning more out of state companies had to provide the slack at a massive premimium. Again, the local providers had to resell this at a loss. This led to the California based companies to be essentially bankrupt, leading to near bankruptcy. This led to the state of California to buy at a fixed rate power contracts to shore up the sagging electric companies, and therefore, absorb the losses that would be passed onto the consumer. Ouch. When the power market started to level off, California was left paying premium rates when power was then much cheaper, thanks to locking in rates at the virtual top of the energy market prices.

      This article explains it better than I can.

      California should not have bailed out the power companies. Bad move. Price caps meant to help things made things worse. What should have been done was to make the distribution and generation companies pay into a relief fund for people who couldn't pay the rates directly during the deregulation process. The transition between heavily and less heavily regulated markets usually leads to higher prices and production shortfalls. This isn't news. California thought price controls and bailouts and fixed power contracts would make things better.

      Nope.

  37. Shocking by dont_think_twice · · Score: 1

    Police and fire officials said yesterday that they had no reports of injuries during the 911 failure

    Shocking - there were no reported injuries during the time when nobody was able to report injuries.

    After reviewing their records, the police also realized that before the 911 system was implemented, there were no calls to 911.

    1. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what they mean by that is, the Fire and Police departments got no reports of injuries, sustained during the outage, after the outage.

      Well that's what I interpret it to be anyway.

  38. ...We're sorry... by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Funny

    "gaaaaackkkk... Get this thing off of me!!!"


    "... that number is temporarily out of service."

    ......grrrrrrrrrrrrrr......

    "Look you F&*%#$ chihuaha!! I'm sorry I took your chalupa! I'm sorry god damnit!!!"
    ......grrrrrrrrrrrrrr......


    "Please check the number and try your call again again."

    "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!"


    "If you need assistance please call your operator."


    *gurrrgle*

    *click*

  39. Re:Mods on crack by AdamHaun · · Score: 4, Informative

    311 is the non-emergency number for police/fire/medical services in some areas.

    --
    Visit the
  40. 511 by Stalemate · · Score: 4, Informative

    Last I checked 511 will tell you your own phone number. It sounds silly, but it came in handy for me in college when they would often forget to tell us the phone numbers for our dorm rooms.

    That number is handy, but I have to admit that the time I called the pizza place that I knew had caller id and asked them what my phone number was makes a lot better story!

    NOTE: I just tried this on my home for and it worked. My phone company is CenturyTel.

    1. Re:511 by The+Vulture · · Score: 2, Informative

      It differs from area to area.

      Here in California, 511 (so the signs/radio ads say, I haven't tried it) will give you travel information - road conditions, traffic accident reports, bus schedules, carpooling information, etc.

      -- Joe

    2. Re:511 by hysma · · Score: 3, Informative

      The number 211 use to work in here in BC, Canada with Telus. They changed that a few years ago though, supposedly because phreakers were using it to identify the phone lines they got ahold of.

      Now, you just call the power company at 1 888 POWER-ON and it repeats the number back to you :)

      Some other *11s around here...

      611 = repair
      711 = TTY/TDD operator from payphones

    3. Re:511 by and+by · · Score: 1

      In the Portland, OR area it used to be 611, but that changed when they implemented 10-digit dialing. I'm pretty sure that 611 still works in 541.

    4. Re:511 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Oregon, 511 gets you road information.

    5. Re:511 by nbvb · · Score: 1

      Here in the NY/NJ area, "958" does it for us.

      Ties you into the ANI system and plays back the number you're at ...

    6. Re:511 by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      The number 211 use to work in here in BC, Canada with Telus. They changed that a few years ago though, supposedly because phreakers were using it to identify the phone lines they got ahold of.

      511 works up here (607 area code) with Frontier as your local phone company -- but not with Verizon (we have about a dozen different carriers in our area code).

      One time I called Verizon and asked them what the number was to figure out my line because I was trying to figure out a clusterfuck of telephone cables at the office (my company has over 40 analog phone lines). They refused to give it to me for exactly that reason. They said people were hacking phone lines and using that to figure out what the number was. So being the resourceful guy that I am I called my cell phone from each line that I was testing and looked at the caller-id to figure out what the number was.

      Another wonderful example of the stupidity of security through obscurity. I was forced to take an extra step to complete my (quite legitimate) task while any phreaker was using the line for bad things could just do exactly what I did (call another number and rely on the caller id) to figure out the line number.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:511 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used 958 today (at a residence on NYC Central Park east; I am more familiar with non-residential service) on two pots lines, each said "Bell Atlantic... 212 XXX XXXX" one in male and one in female voice, both very not-phone-company-like recording quality. Rarely do I hear the carrier announced, and often not the area code, here in the NYC/NJ area

  41. Re:Doesn't work? My mistake by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    That's what I had thought-- but believe it or not, the username/password combo lasted for quite a long time, so...

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  42. Here's a nice "Well, duh" moment. by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Funny
    Police and fire officials said yesterday that they had no reports of injuries during the 911 failure.

    Probably because folks were trying to use 911 to report them.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  43. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You don't know Microsoft wasn't responsible.

    Lives could have been lost in this technology failure, and Microsoft is a technology company right? Can't we all just agree to distort the truth so that Microsoft looks responsible?

    Isn't that why we're all here? Isn't it?

  44. Bee-Beeee-Beeep! by amaiman · · Score: 1, Funny

    The number you have dialed, Nine...One...One is not in service. No further information is available about Nine...One...One. The number you have dialed...

  45. That's Verizon for you, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you ask anyone from IT who has to deal with Verizon, they'll all tell you that Verizon and incompetence go together.

    1. Re:That's Verizon for you, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be dealing with the mickey-mouse DSL division. When you deal with Verizon Advanced Data Services, you get knowledgable, friendly techs and excellent support. So, no, Verizon as a whole is not incompetent.

    2. Re:That's Verizon for you, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be dealing with the mickey-mouse DSL division.

      Mickey Mouse DSL? Wait, did Verizon buy Disney, instead of Comcast?

  46. Obligitory "Verizon Guy" Quote... by 2bot_or_not_2bot · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Can you hear me now?..." After a few minutes of silence, the Verizon Guy is totally disillusioned.

  47. WTF?!?!!!1111 by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Strange. First, human and computer error caused the entire power grid in that area of the world to go down for quite a few hours. Now, the 911 system had a similar (although much smaller, I suppose) event. Why are so many things of this nature happening in New York? Does it have anything to do with the city's density?

    In any case, New York is the suxx0rz because city services don't work.

    1. Re:WTF?!?!!!1111 by MavEtJu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does it have anything to do with the city's density?

      Media density. All fourty-nine television stations mentioned it, all seven-thousand talkback radio shows had an hour long discussion about it. And don't forget the newspapers, although they managed to give a more digested version of what happened instead of the minute-by-minute update of (mis)information what the television stations did.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    2. Re:WTF?!?!!!1111 by Introspective · · Score: 0

      Bad things like this happen everywhere around the world. This gets into the headlines because New Yorkers are so good at telling the whole world about every little problem they have.

    3. Re:WTF?!?!!!1111 by TioHoltzman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Two words:

      Navel Gazing

    4. Re:WTF?!?!!!1111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why are so many things of this nature happening in New York?
      The "Great Blackout of 2003" originated in Ohio, not in New York. Details here.
    5. Re:WTF?!?!!!1111 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Does it have anything to do with the city's density?

      Hey, people in New York are just as smart as people anywhere else!

      Chris Mattern

  48. Don't mod me up please! by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The information is now incorrect! Don't mod me up, mod people who deserve it!

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    1. Re:Don't mod me up please! by MikeXpop · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's absolutely correct! Mod parent up informative!

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Don't mod me up please! by System.out.println() · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Poor mods... where should the points go? *scratches head*

  49. More Than One "Human Error" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1, Informative

    > A combination of human error and software that
    > didn't anticipate...

    Several "human errors", one of them be excessive centralization.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  50. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 0, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

  51. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is an old trick that would have never ever ever worked and originated as a JOKE! It was orignally known as the "blotto box", google around for more info.

  52. DDOS 911 by temojen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here a few years ago there was a sting of robberies where the thieves called a whole lot of people and convinced them to "test" the emergency response system at a specified time a few days later.

    All of a sudden there were hundreds of simultaneous calls reporting accidents, fires, muggings, heart attacks, rapes, robberies, etc. The thieves robbed two banks and a big-box store while the police were tied up.

    1. Re:DDOS 911 by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Got any documentation as to where this happened, or is this just an urban myth?

    2. Re:DDOS 911 by rark · · Score: 1

      Where is 'here'? I really want to know more about this, particularly how the theives managed to get a lot of people to 'test' the system by reporting something that isn't happening -- I mean, if someone calls you up and says "Tomorrow at 2:30 we need you to test your local emergency response system by reporting a non-existant event" would you do it? Would anyone? Posing as local officials and having people call up ostensibly to test the system could potentially work, but a whole bunch of people calling up saying "I'm calling to test this like you asked yesterday" doesn't provide as effective a DDOS as getting them to report non-existant emergencies.

  53. Re:Full text (what happened to google partner link by BlueLabel · · Score: 1
    • "It's very unusual for that to happen, but it's understandable," said Robert C. Krause, executive director of Emergency Services Consultants in Toledo, Ohio, who is familiar with the New York system. "I don't know if anyone would anticipate this because it's a highly technical thing. I think most public safety administrators would assume that their numbers are safeguarded."

    #include <errno.h>
    #include <phone/system.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <stupid/verizon.h>

    int main(int argc, char *argv[])
    {
    • char *phone_number = get_phone_number();


    • /*
      * This will never happen, and the routine is slow.
      *
      * validate_phone_number(phone_number);
      * if (errno == EBADPHONENUM) {
      * yell_at_verizon(errno, "moron");
      * return EXIT_FAILURE;
      * }
      */

      change_phone_number(phone_number);
      return EXIT_SUCCESS;
    }
    --
    Devin
  54. In other news... by JamesP · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... DIebold anounced their plans to replace Verizon at handling the 911 system...

    "We figured out that with our new phone systems, completely powered by Microsoft Software these problems will be a thing of the past"

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  55. The backup didn't fail... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The political types saying that they don't have a good enough backup 911 system failed to understand the root cause of this failure.

    A Verizon tech who was re-routing a customer's numbers accidently made a numerical error that ended up re-routing lines that were meant to go to 911 to a bank. Therefore, the backup system never got a chance to kick in, people were being routed to a very poor selection for a primary destination.

    The safety valve that I'm sure is being installed now is requiring a higher degree of password to change the routing instructions for the 911 lines... because this tech should not have been able to mess with them, and didn't mean to, he just typoed the numbers he was supposed to type in. He at least should have seen a "You're trying to reroute 911! Are you sure you want to do that? N" prompt.

  56. Analysis of a Flawed System by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As I read the article, it is obvious that NYC's system is fraught with deep flaws in its design and management. These include:

    1. False redundancy: Although the NYC system has a backup central offices and call centers, it apparently routes all calls from the affected area through a single Verizon subsystem. Their system is fully redundant except where its not.

    2. Organizational silos in a coupled system: The City claimed that its 911 system was fine because "an error like the one made by Verizon could not necessarily have been prevented because it was not a flaw in the 911 system itself." Yet the Verizon circuits, systems, and procedures are an integral part of the 911 system. The City (and Verizon) maintain a fiction that they are independent entities when, in fact, they are tightly coupled. This division of responsibility is fine for playing the CYA Blame Game, but does not create a robust system.

    3. User Interface Flaws I don't know what kind of user interface that technician was using, but it obviously has some terrible flaws if it did not warn him of the implications of the data entries. I also suspect that he was manually retyping some numbers off a computer print-out when he should have had some mechanism to download a set of proofread, verified, double-checked entries.

    I don't fault NYC or Verizon in particular, they are probably no worse that anyone else. I only get angry that these types of structural insecurities are probably more widespread than anyone realizes.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Analysis of a Flawed System by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      > 2. Organizational silos in a coupled system: The City claimed that its 911 system was fine because "an error like the one made by Verizon could not necessarily have been prevented because it was not a flaw in the 911 system itself." Yet the Verizon circuits, systems, and procedures are an integral part of the 911 system. The City (and Verizon) maintain a fiction that they are independent entities when, in fact, they are tightly coupled. This division of responsibility is fine for playing the CYA Blame Game, but does not create a robust system.

      This is a recurring pattern that safety engineers look for. Where two jurisdictions touch, they cause accidents by either overlapping ("Someone must have accidentally turned off this circuit breaker, I'll turn in back oZAPP!") or by leaving a gap ("it wasn't my job to clean up the nitroglycerin spill").

      Want an example of this in geekland? How about that VPN between your company and your big supplier? Their security affects your security, but who is in charge of it?

    2. Re:Analysis of a Flawed System by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. False redundancy: Although the NYC system has a backup central offices and call centers, it apparently routes all calls from the affected area through a single Verizon subsystem. Their system is fully redundant except where its not.

      No, the calls always have multiple paths they can travel. The problem came when all of the routers were given the same mis-information. No number of redundant routers can protect from that.

    3. Re:Analysis of a Flawed System by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I don't know what kind of user interface that technician was using, but it obviously has some terrible flaws if it did not warn him of the implications of the data entries.
      That can only happen if the system knows that there are implications. 911 calls are routed to a central switch, then become 'normal' phone numbers and are then routed to the 911 call center, if you 'hardwire' those secondary numbers into the system you make it more difficult to re-configure your 911 system. In the end you trade one set of possible screw-ups for another.
    4. Re:Analysis of a Flawed System by mpe · · Score: 1

      Although the NYC system has a backup central offices and call centers, it apparently routes all calls from the affected area through a single Verizon subsystem. Their system is fully redundant except where its not.

      Any system is only as redundent as it's least redundent part

    5. Re:Analysis of a Flawed System by mpe · · Score: 1

      That can only happen if the system knows that there are implications. 911 calls are routed to a central switch, then become 'normal' phone numbers and are then routed to the 911 call center, if you 'hardwire' those secondary numbers into the system you make it more difficult to re-configure your 911 system.

      Depends if the system can take note of the number actually dialed with respect to routing decisions. This may be something the software for "North American Numbering Plan" does not support whereas the software for "Rest of the Planet" does. The companies making telephone switching hardware do actually divide their code bases up in that way.

  57. Better One by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    You want a real 911 call, try this recording. It is an oldie but a goodie.

  58. damn it! by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    why couldn't have bush chocked on a pretzel in that time!

    1. Re:damn it! by Nikkodemus · · Score: 1
      why couldn't have bush chocked on a pretzel in that time!
      ..because the pretzel has standards.
  59. 911 is a Joke by Diamon · · Score: 1
    Verizon says calls were rerouted during a procedure to upgrade service for a corporate client.
    "Now to know that the 911 system is that vulnerable to these routine types of disruptions is a very serious concern," said Councilman Vincent Gentile.
    Don't worry councilman Gentile, they've got an upgrade planned that will fix it. D'Oh!

    (For those that don't get the subject it was a Public Enemy song, which was later covered by Duran Duran.)
  60. Subtle Terrorism? by FTL · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "We don't have an adequate backup system for 911, which is more important than ever as we fight the war against terrorism." -- Councilman Peter F. Vallone Jr.

    Eh? Did NYPD and NYFD need the 911 system to find out about the WTC strikes? Terrorism isn't about killing people, it's about getting publicity.

    The councilman can rest assured that the terrorists will helpfully keep their activities high-profile enough that 911 notification will not be required.

    [Sheesh, why does *everything* have to be about terrorism these days.]

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Subtle Terrorism? by Mao · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Terrorism isn't bbout killing people, it's about getting publicity.

      Well... depends on what kind of terrorism you are talking about. If you are talking about politically motivated terrorism like the IRA, FARC, Hizbollah, then yes, publicity is part, if not all, of the goal. But if you are talking about terrorism like the Al Qaeda variety, notice that they almost never claim responsibility for their attacks, not for the African embassy bombings, not for WTC (ASSUMING, of course, that they are indeed behind those attacks). There goes the publicity premise.

    2. Re:Subtle Terrorism? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Publicity may have been a poor word to choose, but notoriety or fame may be better. How can a person be filled with terror (the art of terrorism, after all) without being aware of that which is supposed ot terrorize them?

      --
      ± 29 dB
  61. 911 was slashdotted. by CowardNeal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blame you guys.

    1. Re:911 was slashdotted. by Technician · · Score: 0

      How could it be? I clicked on the 911 and nothing happened. The poster forgot to put in the hyperlink so the system was saved from a /. effect. Quick, someone post the google cache and mirror links for 911!

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  62. Re:Well, how about this, then... by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it's not "almost is bad", it's many times worse. Not being able to switch your phone number is an inconvenience. Not being able to get help when you're being robbed, your house is burning, or your spouse just had a heart attack is catastrophic.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  63. Re:Doesn't work? My mistake by STrinity · · Score: 4, Informative

    The NYT has a habit of catching these things. It won't even let you register cypherpunks/cypherpunks. However, there is a work around -- get some sort of proxy, such as Proxomitron, and configure it so the referer is news.google.com. The same trick works with the WaPo's new registration service.

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  64. Re:Of Human Error and Metasystems (simulation) by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    I was thinking more of a system that would catch this sort of error in advance, rather than after the damage had already been done by a data-entry error.

    Absolutely! A competent network simulation would help predict the impact of a change and catch errors before they are committed. A monitoring system that correlated changes in system behavior against changes in configuration provides added safety in the likely event that the simulation is imperfect or the technician enters values different from that simulated.

    Its a tricky problem because at some micolevel, the technician's entries were valid because the box he was configuring would have no way of knowing that it should not route calls to the bank (the bank and 911 system are just 2 indistingushable high-volume trunk lines). Only at the application layer would the system notice that 911 calls weren't getting answered.

    I do agree that simulation of the ffects of command/config and inline warnings of the impact of a change woudl be good.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  65. Re:Bad software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, way to crash and burn. That was really unfunny.

  66. Score tied between POTS & VOIP by Rich+Klein · · Score: 2, Funny

    So reliable 911 service *isn't* an advantage that POTS has over VOIP?

    --
    -Rich
  67. Modding Non-Reg Links by Ateryx · · Score: 1

    Please, this is karma whoring (perhaps unintentially), don't mod a non-reg link comment Informative.

    Instead mod non-reg links and article texts as FUNNY if they are not posted AC, this brings them to the top and adds nothing to the posters karma score.

    --
    "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    1. Re:Modding Non-Reg Links by a.koepke · · Score: 1

      Erm, what the heck is the underrated option there for?

      --


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    2. Re:Modding Non-Reg Links by bob65 · · Score: 1

      Honest question: Why do people care about karma? Does it affect your ability to post to/read articles? More specifically, why would anyone care about anyone else's karma?

    3. Re:Modding Non-Reg Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because it is VITAL that you do not add to anyone else's karma. Because karma is so important. Please, somebody, think of the children.

    4. Re:Modding Non-Reg Links by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      I personally don't give a crap about karma; I don't post all that often.

      However it does affect your ability to post. If you have high karma (Excellent), you get the karma bonus. If you get low karma, I believe you get a posting limit imposed (10/day IIRC), and post at either 0 or -1 by default.

      People care about other people gaining easy karma as it is a technique said to be often employed by trolls who get a load of easy karma, then troll when they get to Excellent karma, so they already have a Score:2 troll.

    5. Re:Modding Non-Reg Links by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      Instead mod non-reg links and article texts as FUNNY if they are not posted AC, this brings them to the top and adds nothing to the posters karma score.

      Yeah! Mod me as FUNNY, its the only chance i'll get :-)

  68. Software error? by DJTodd242 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Not likely. I bet it was a secret attack by the LOD!

  69. I hope they give Verizon hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone who has ever worked for a vendor for Verizon, AOL, Microsoft, etc. loves to watch them in the hot seat.

    Big corporate clients are the worst kind of assholes as customers.

    Of course the executives themselves never suffer... Fuckers.

  70. The unemployed Ohio power plant operator... by dark-br · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...just found a new job. Well, he's unemployed again anyways.

  71. Re:Old News by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I second this. I Live in PA. I would have no idea about a NY phone system crashing if it wasn't for this website posting the info...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  72. Monopolies dont run the phone system by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks to the government mandated breakup and unfair reprisals against AT&T, the current phone system in the USA is **NOT** a monopoly.

    This is yet another example of why the breakup was a bad thing.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  73. what's more important.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... for the average consumer these days? 911 service, or ring tones in 3-D Dolby sensurround and plastic phone skins that match your ride's upholstery? Reliability, or the race to create the smallest possible phone keyboard that even elves couldn't use?

    We get what we pay for.....

    Besides that, seems to me just plain living in NYC 24/7 would be an automatic 911 call anyplace else...

    zogger

  74. AT&T was far from perfect by dachshund · · Score: 4, Informative
    Now I don't think monopolies are a good idea in the general case, however AT&T's results were at least halfway decent.

    Yet at the same time, daytime Long Distance cost over a dollar a minute from NY to California. Phones and telephone equipment had to be rented from the phone company, so technological development in many areas (faxes, answering systems, business telephony) came at a snail's pace. Also, if you think DSL rollout was slow and overpriced under the Baby Bells, just imagine what it would have been like under Ma Bell. All things have their price, and this was a high one.

    Furthermore, AT&T had their problems as well. On at least one occasion, they had massive network failures due to a combination of-- guess what-- human error and software failure.

    1. Re:AT&T was far from perfect by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      Yet at the same time, daytime Long Distance cost over a dollar a minute from NY to California. Phones and telephone equipment had to be rented from the phone company

      Well yeah, Nobel Prize-winning researchers don't come cheap.

  75. Re:Old News by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hell, I live in NY state, and this is the first i've heard of it, online or the radio.

  76. Get used to it by oldstrat · · Score: 4, Interesting



    Having worked in private line provisioning and maintenance at Ma Bell I can say without equivocation that this is a direct result of the breakup and not really 'human error'.
    I've seen the exact same thing being done at all the locals and the long distance companies.
    Manpower is being drawn down, redundancies eliminated, and a talent and brain drain that causes errors like this.
    The reason is always given that automation is allowing the company to maximize the remaining workforce and competition makes is neccesary. BS.

    Best Practices are -gone- everything is driven by sales and bean counters. Engineers, Technicians and Managers who complain are moved, removed or eliminated from the loop because facts are not going to be allowed to get in the way.

    It used to take weeks to get a misdirected line corrected in some instances.
    The fault was blamed on too many layers, and union incompetence.
    Now with all the improvements brought about by divestiture and competition it is a near imposibility unless it affects a major source of income or government.

    This type of error was prevented by human redundancy and a workforce able to put the breaks on before the damage was done because they could stand on the strength of regulations and the union and tell the idiot boss in charge that things were wrong.

    Get used to it, rapid reorder will be the order of the day.

    1. Re:Get used to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is half right.

      There were too many layers at Ma Bell. But with all the "manpower reductions" and "elimination of redundancies", there are still too many layers.

      A 911 correction today requires a local telco in Portland to send an update to Florida, so that it can be uploaded to Kansas, and retrieved by someone in Ohio for review, then batched on a system in Denver that will finally load the data into the 911 system in Portland.

      All the people from Florida to Denver are non-techy bureaucrats fighting for job security. The drone doing the "check" in Ohio has never been to Portland, let alone the suburb in which this small telco operates. They don't know if Johnsons just moved or not. They just check that Broadway Avenue uses the correct abbreviation for Avenue, as approved by the Portland City Council, and that the street number is within approved bounds. If not, they inform Kansas that there is an error. Oh, and they probably _are_ union.

      Meanwhile, the small telco in Portland can't convince anybody in Florida, Kansas, Ohio, or Denver that a new subdivision has gone up on Broadway, and the address is actually correct. Even if someone in Denver believes them, there is nothing they can do about it.

      If they were allowed to interact directly with EMS personnel in their local area, they might straighten things out very easily.

      But Ma Bell was not replaced by small friendly companies. It was replaced by more layers of unfriendly megacorps with less technical people in the middle.

    2. Re:Get used to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The breakup?" Still bitter about that, twenty years later huh?

      Go back to the Ma Bell retirement home and play another round of shuffleboard. I'm sure you'll find a sympathetic ear there.

    3. Re:Get used to it by oldstrat · · Score: 1

      " "The breakup?" Still bitter about that, twenty years later huh?

      Go back to the Ma Bell retirement home and play another round of shuffleboard. I'm sure you'll find a sympathetic ear there. "

      Retirement home my ass, I started in 1997 and was let go in 2003.
      Here's a FACT for you (anonymous) and anyone else who thinks the breakup saved you money, increased quality and improved services.
      The only positive side of the breakup has been an increased variety of telecom related services for which all added together cost 500% more than they did before the breakup.

      Telecom (in it's myriad current forms) is a 21st century vital service, not the luxury it was a mere 2 decades ago.
      The old horse is being hobbled everyone wants to own the ears, but nobody wants to pay yo feed the legs.
      A T1 is a T1 no matter what you put on it for an overlay feature or service, and the same is true for all the multiplexed bigger brothers. In the 21st century the country that wins is going to be the one with the most coordinated, reliable system that reaches from and to each and every point desired. High Speed everywhere, and fully interoperable.
      That isn't going to happen with the turf wars that are taking place.
      We are witnessing at this time an implosion that appears all shiny on the outside, but it's burnt out and collapsing behind the pretty shimmer.

      Everybody wants the sweet markets and top dollar consumer but if they are allowed to focus on that alone, shake off regulation and abandon the longmile short suscribers, then there will be gaps so big that it won't matter.

      It will be worse than a digital, class, or economic divide, it will be a geographic divide that no nation the size of the United States can survive in an era where 'imaginary' bits are the real currency and the value of a mountain of gold can be changed with just one shifted bit.

  77. Public Enemy by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Public Enemy got it right with their single 911 is a joke, especially the line "I call a cab cuz a cab will come quicker".

  78. I've had that happen! by p51d007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked 911 for 14 years........here in the midwest, we have tornados around this time of year. The warning sirens usually go off to warn the public. Ok, I'm sitting at my console, waiting for people to call about wind damage etc......and the line rings....911, do you have an emergency?....yeah, can you tell me what the sirens are going off for?.........it's a shame that the line is recorded....there have been times, when we get idiot calls like that, that you really really want to say....well, I'm sorry to tell you this, but the russians have changed their minds, the bombs will be here in 10 minutes. And then, hang up on them LOL.... Heck, we've had calls from people that ask us where Bass Pro Shops is.....(Springfield Missouri)

    1. Re:I've had that happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, we've had calls from people that ask us where Bass Pro Shops is.....(Springfield Missouri)

      Well, when you gotta go fishin', you gotta to fishin'.

      I've been to Springfield. Isn't it right next door to the dynamite shop?

      Dynamite -- invented so even rednecks could fish

    2. Re:I've had that happen! by GWTPict · · Score: 0

      Same here in the Uk, I think may favourite was the guy who rang for an ambulance to fetch him a condom because his girlfriend was hot and ready but he'd run out of contraception.....

    3. Re:I've had that happen! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And they should have brought him one, people that stupid shouldn't be allowed to breed!

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  79. Permission to Modify by thedillybar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Congratulations to the people running the show over there. I'm really impressed they implemented plan B so quickly and got the system back up and running so fast. No one likes a page on Friday night...

    As far as the software is concerned, I'm glad it's getting fixed. Sounds like your typical permissions problem to me. Some guy out in the field shouldn't be able to redirect the phone number for 911. Just like some e-mail attachment I run shouldn't be able to modify HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\Run.

    Seriously, this is something that should be top priority in all kinds of software. Even if the person at the keyboard should be able to modify stuff, doesn't mean they want to. And by default, they should not have the ability to modify certain data.

    Let's learn from this and crack down on insecure code. PLEASE!!

    1. Re:Permission to Modify by BlueTrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you mean that they should implement popup windows that asks if the user is sure that he wants to modify this data :?

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    2. Re:Permission to Modify by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      No. The 911 data change must be different than all the other data changes. If he has to confirm every change, it's going to become an automatic "push enter twice" and isn't going to help anything.

      Ordinary data should stay as it is, emergency phone data should come with a warning and/or confirmation by another person. In any case, it shouldn't be the same as ordinary data.

  80. Re:Full text (what happened to google partner link by gkuz · · Score: 1

    Why is violating the NY Times' copyright considered "Informative"? Regardless of how the tin-foil hat crowd feels about the Times' registration policy (feed them a fake name, fer chrissake!) or how the whole /. herd feels about the current state of US copyright law, the Times actually pays people a salary to write, edit and publish this stuff, and they (IMO) have a right to say how it can be re-published. Posting the full text of their work on an unrelated site is not "fair use".

  81. Civil Defense Sirens by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may have been someone who recently moved to the area and didn't know about the tornado warning system. I'm old enough that when I hear a test of civil defense sirens, the first thing that comes to mind is "Oh shit. We're going to be nuked by the Russians."

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Civil Defense Sirens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be pretty old, then.. since there weren't any "Russians" between the middle of WWI and the end of the Cold War.

    2. Re:Civil Defense Sirens by jadenyk · · Score: 1

      I just moved into the sticks in DE and they have a volunteer fire department, which they call to duty with that siren. The first few times my wife and I heard it, we were nervous to say the least.

      Luckily, I had neighbors that would watch us out the window and laugh at us, rather than actually tell us what was going on. After a few weeks, they finally filled us in.

    3. Re:Civil Defense Sirens by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      The fire station a block from my house sets off its civil defense siren at noon and 9:45PM every single day for some reason. If there was an actual attack coming, no one here would even notice it.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  82. Backup systems by chiph · · Score: 1

    However, several City Council members expressed anger that the 911 system could have been so easily disabled, and called for creating a more effective backup procedure.

    What, like leaning out the window and screaming for help?

    Or, depending on your neighborhood, leaning out the window and firing a quick 3 or 4 shots into the air?

  83. I know one's going to believe this.... by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1, Funny

    When living in a back-lot guest house Venice, CA I was woken up in the early AM to someone pounding on the main house back door....it was the next door neighbor asking "What's the number for 911, my mom is having a heart attack!"

    If only the Darwin Awards had been around back then.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    1. Re:I know one's going to believe this.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      How is this worthy of a Darwin Award ? Remember, you have to remove yourself from the gene pool by your own stupidity, not someone else.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  84. Bad Example by cgenman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plan 9 was an utter failure. Just three zombies? What were the aliens thinking?

  85. Politicians and Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say that as a former New Yawka, I unfortunately remember the more humoristic qualities of the New York ways of life. Once you take a guy "Dat tawks like dis" and make him a councilman, then you have a tough guy who needs to bully everyone around.
    Let's face it. In the technology world, any single one of us could have made the same mistake. In fact, many of us have done things even more stupid than accidentally performing a typo which rerouted some information. I did it once to the US Central Automatec Clearing House for money transfers, took 3 weeks of A LOT of people working overtime to manually verify and correct my error which was actually caught 20 minutes after the system went live.
    This was some guy who accidentally typed a few numbers wrong. Now you have some idiot councilman (which sounds like he was the father of a friend of mine, coincidence probably) yelling that he wants a hearing and probably will try and impose the death penelty for the offense.
    After living outside of NY for 10 years, every day of my life I wish at sometime that I could have a real slice of pizza, or go shopping on 5th, or eat a hebrew national hotdog on wallstreet during lunch, it's the irrationality of the politicians who can make George Jr.'s budget deficits look tiny in relation that keep me from going back.
    Oh... There's one other thing. I don't want my two kids growing up in a city with that many cops... it's practically a police state there. I would rather them feel safe because there are no cops instead of being scared to death that if they sneeze while walking at night, a cop will harrass them for an hour.

    1. Re:Politicians and Technology by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      a cop will harrass them for an hour.
      Just an hour? Sheez, how laid back are your cops?
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  86. Re:Old News by Democracy_0001-Alpha · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you think you can provide the story much faster and sumit it to slashdot earlier than other people. Please do so, or stop complaining.

  87. Pinning the tail on the donkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know which of the two (TCS / Intrado) E-911 MPC service providers cover NYC for Verizon?

  88. Get used to it-Social layers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically in every company, lives that gremlin known as greed, just waiting for the brakes (deregulation) to be taken off, and it can run rampent. In the interm it made excuses, and overall foot dragging, in lui of it getting what it really wants. Yes I can see human layers (job security) being a great dampener on basic instincts.

  89. The transistor by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the thing was that because Bell Lab's transistor contained gold it was not comercializable. Intel invented the Al/Si transistor AND the integrated circut. Plus, by all accounts, William Shockley was... not very nice.

    1. Re:The transistor by Mister+Attack · · Score: 1

      because Bell Lab's transistor contained gold it was not comercializable
      Say what? Bell Labs invented the bipolar junction transistor (P-doped, then N-doped, then P-doped Si or Ge) (also available in NPN), as well as zone refining, the first technology which could create pure enough Si to build a working transistor. And as far as Shockley's personal character, who cares? He got the job done. Don't minimize the contributions of Bell Labs to semiconductor physics; they were tremendously helpful.

  90. You're missing one important point by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    The idea of having a second person "double-check" is nice in theory, but I will wager that the second person will let errors through too.

    You're missing one vital point- according to the article, the technician was working on a bank's lines. The problem was he typed in the wrong line numbers and essentially accidentally wound up working on 911 lines instead.

    The Verizon policy change will "require a second technician when the changes involve the 911 system". That policy does NOTHING to address the problem, because the tech wasn't supposed to be working on the 911 system in the first place, so he wouldn't have asked a second guy to check over his work!

    A proper solution, as many have pointed out, would have been restricting changes to any component of the system involving 911- or even just a "line part of 911, change?(y/N)" would have done the trick.

  91. His point stands... by bwoodring · · Score: 1

    The Cole bombing, African Embassy, WTC, Madrid, Tokyo Subway, Oklahoma City... what do all these acts of terrorism have in common? They didn't exactly require a good samaritan to report them over an emergency phone number, they were all sort of... high profile.

    911 has nothing to do with terrorism, and won't protect us from terrorism. But talking about terrorism sounds very serious and makes a politician sound less clueless.

  92. We Never Stop Working For You by william_lorenz · · Score: 1

    So should "Verizon, We Never Stop Working For You" now be changed to "Verizon, We Never Stop Working For You Except When You Need Us The Most"? ;)

  93. Re:Mods on crack by boarder8925 · · Score: 0

    *Dials 911*
    Automated voice: "911 service is temporarily down. Redirecting to 311."
    *Is redirected*
    "Hello?"
    "Yeah, uh, there's a fire over at--"
    "I'm sorry, sir, you must be looking for the 911 line. Please stand by as you're redirected."
    *Is redirected*
    Automated voice: "911 service is temporarily down. Redirecting to 311."
    ...


  94. 511 = 911 in St. Louis by MacFury · · Score: 1

    I tried dialing 511 on my Verizon cellphone, area code 314...and it put me through to the 911 switchboard. I sheepishly apologized quickly and got off the phone.

  95. it makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe moving the 911 call center offshore to india will help?

  96. Have you ever tried to get the number for 911? by Animats · · Score: 1

    It's annoyingly difficult to get to a public safety answering point from a cell phone. In California, 911 from Sprint cell phones usually results in waiting on hold, then reaching the California Highway Patrol. Calling information and asking for dispatch for the appropriate police department routes you to a telco supervisor, and you have to explain what you want to get there.

  97. Re:Doesn't work? My mistake by mellonhead · · Score: 1

    Go to Google News, type in "Verizon New York 911." Read all the Ny Times articles without logging on.

  98. The news was modded down by lysium · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I mentioned it yesterday, and was immediately modded down. You think people would want to know...

    ===--===

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:The news was modded down by twofidyKidd · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up, but I already used all my points, and life is a bitch like that...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  99. Police reported.. by scsirob · · Score: 1

    "Police and fire officials said yesterday that they had no reports of injuries during the 911 failure".

    Duhhh...

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  100. Truck Knocks Out 911 Phones in Service by bobwilkins · · Score: 2, Informative

    Orleans/Essex Counties Vermont BY SETH POWERS And ROBIN SMITH, Staff Writers - A dump truck hit an aerial fiber-optic cable in Barton Tuesday morning, knocking out most local and all long-distance phone service for 18,000 people in Essex and Orleans counties. The dump truck was working on a new driveway off Route 5 near Crystal Lake and clipped the line at 8:30 a.m., said Beth Fastiggi, spokeswoman for Verizon. After the damage, residents were able to dial within their own exchange, but not to neighboring exchanges or long distance. "People in Island Pond could call people in Island Pond, but not out of their area," Fastiggi said. Those calling into Essex and Orleans counties found the phones gave a busy signal for hours, as workers attempted to fix the problem. Phone service was restored by 1:40 p.m., after phone crews spliced a new cable into the damaged line, Fastiggi said. The damaged line is a connector between seven northern Vermont towns and St. Johnsbury - and then to the rest of the world, Fastiggi said. For an Island Pond resident to dial out of Island Pond, the resident's call goes through the St. Johnsbury host station, and out to Barton or Boston, depending on where the individual wants to call. Other affected exchanges were in Albany, Barton, Derby and Derby Line, Morgan, Newport City, Norton, Orleans and Troy, according to Evelyn Bailey, executive director of the Vermont emergency 911 board. The 911 service worked. However, people in these exchange areas, with the exception of Derby, were unable to reach it, she said Tuesday afternoon. Derby callers were connected directly to the local state police barracks and its 911 dispatchers. They would never have known that they were not tied into the 911 network, she said. The damage affected some Internet and cellular phone service as well. Both rely on land lines, depending on the service, Bailey said. Bailey, as Vermont's emergency 911 contact, and the hospital were contacted by Verizon when the network went down. Vermont State Police and other emergency services are also alerted. North Country Hospital in Newport City had working e-mail and Internet service all morning, but was limited like everyone else to calls within the city exchange, said Larry Labor, acting chief executive officer. The hospital internally had no problems after the phone system failure, he said. Emergency connections with rescue and other crews are radio-based. Also, there were plenty of cell phones on hand to connect to other health services outside the area. These kinds of failures are not rare, Bailey said. "It's so common for someone to put a backhoe into the ground without calling Dig Safe." Anyone preparing to dig is required by law to call the Dig Safe number: 888-344-7233. With Tuesday's phone system failure in mind, Bailey has two recommendations for local residents: Along with 911, have the seven-digit number for your local police or fire department handy. And don't call 911 when there are problems just to see if it is working. "You'd be surprised how many people can't resist," Bailey said.

    --
    Bob is at home in the Northeast Kingdom.
  101. Re:Doesn't work? My mistake by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    There's a very easy way of making the referer "www.google.com" (which is enough to get the article) - just search for the article URL on Google.

    This is how I get NYT articles on the odd occasion I want to read them (not often enough to register a username/password.)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  102. Why not register? by Slinky+Saves+the+Wor · · Score: 1

    I mean... how the hell do they know if you tell the truth or not?

    So just go ahead and register.

    --
    I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Why not register? by subtropolis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Right you are. OT, but it just occurred to me that that's a very good way to explain Phoenix DRM, Longhorn, et al to the neighbor whose box your helping to patch.

      "The butterflyTM won't let you lie in web forms."

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  103. Re:Real world example by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How often do people use the phone during a severe storm to report dammage etc. How often does a high tension line (7200 volt an up) come down and cross a phone line or cable TV line? Ever seen a report of a wire down taking out an entire area code? Lines do come down all the time due to Ice and Wind storms. I've never heard of this taking out an area code. I have had to do repair work in a home office after a power line crossed a phone line. Anything connected between the phone line and the power line was toast due to arcing. This included a computer with modem, answering machine, cordless telephone base, and fax machine. The POTS was undamaged. The other phones in the neighborhood were OK. Only the line to the house died even though there was enough fault current to burn the line in two and drop it into the street.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  104. I'm sorry, Dave - I can't let you do that. by subtropolis · · Score: 2, Funny

    City and Verizon officials said that while the backup system in place for 911 was functioning properly, it failed to pick up the calls because it was designed to catch a technical error, not a human error that would be interpreted as simply a change of instruction.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  105. Re:Seen on 911 Dispatch Screens by the+pickle · · Score: 0

    Apparently none of the moderators around here have ever seen "The Italian Job."

    Morons.

    p

  106. What the fuck? by Feztaa · · Score: 0, Troll

    311? What the fuck does 311 do in America? Here in Canada (or at least, Alberta), 311 tells you what number you are dialing from. Phone company technicians use it for figuring out which line they tapped into when they're working on houses that have more than one phone line. The only reason I even know about 311 is because the tech guy told me about it when he was installing DSL at my place (he had to rewire some shit because the DSL was screwing up the alarm system).

    So yeah, "It's an emergency! Call 311!" "you're calling from 555-1212" "*phew*, that's a relief"

  107. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sprint maintains 911 records for major municipalities across the country. The 911 system is updated by various Sprint and non-Sprint companies by posting data to a server publicly available on the internet.

    That server is an unprotected Windows box. Connecting to the server gives you commandline access to most of the windows system commands. Without even so much as a password, one can submit "updates", alter other users' data, or just issue system commands.

    I have to believe that the 911 systems under Sprint's control have been owned for a long time by anyone who wants to own them. I believe that the only reason they haven't been exploited in a very public way is because doing so wouldn't be as spectacular as many people might think.

    ATT cable trashed thousands of 911 records for the Salt Lake City area a few years back, It took weeks to rebuild them. Nobody cared.

    A terrorist could strategically scramble the 911 records for the LA airport before shooting up the El Al ticket counter, and ... very few people would care about the 911 problem. They probably wouldn't even bother to fix it.

    If 911 consoles around the country came up with only phone numbers and no addresses from Seattle to Miami it would take half a day for people to realize the system had been corrupted city-wide. Phone calls to Sprint wouldn't even be answered for another half a day, and they wouldn't realize that it was a national problem for another day after that. They wouldn't have a solution for three or four days into the "crisis". It would take a week for them to act on the solution.

    In all, millions of subscribers around the country would be "out of the system" for as much as 10 days. None of them would ever know there had been a problem. Unless someone on the inside decided to go public and push really hard to make the news, it wouldn't be a story. And unless some senator thought it could serve some political purpose, it would all be forgotten in a week.

  108. Re:Old News by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 1

    I believe the only digits you need for that are 9, 1, waaah.

  109. 911 circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    People seem to think that the 911 system is directly connected to the systems that run the telephone network. This really isn't so.

    Databases at telcos contain what they think is accurate data about how the telephone switches are configured. Telcos may occassionaly audit these two systems to see how well they match up. Then again, they may not do such audits. In modern soft switches, the DB controls the switch, so they do match exactly. But most of the world (including the U.S.) still use legacy telephone switches that are not well integrated with the customer DBs.

    Every so often the telcos query their DBs to create 911 update reports. Those reports are passed on to whoever maintains the 911 systems. Then the 911 systems are updated. Maybe.

    Overtime, inconsistencies between the telco's system and the 911 system build up. Every so often (once a year or so, maybe) the 911 system gets purged and reloaded from the telco's system. Between reloads, it is not uncommon for a police department to call the 911 system maintainer or the phone company or both (often the 911 maintainer and the telco are completely unrelated entities) to let them know that there were 911 calls last night from such and such phone numbers which had missing or erroneous address info. Steps may or may not be taken to manually correct the info for those individual phone numbers.

    You might be surprised to see the percentage of 911 calls that come in with bogus subscriber data.

    911 has been a mess for many years and it hasn't been a secret. Eventually, some homeland security committee is going to pass a lot of legislation to address this. The legislation will cost a lot of money, and impose silly requirements. It will likely be drafted by the clowns who have created the bureaucratic 911 system of today. That will only make things worse.

    A handful of good IT folks could clean things up very quickly. But that will never happen.

  110. UK problems by r33per · · Score: 1
    Have to admit that Scotland has been having trouble with the 911 number lately.

    Same problem?

  111. a similar occurrence by shortscruffydave · · Score: 2, Funny

    This reminds me of a story I read back last month, where a programming error meant that 911 calls actually got routed to some guy's home. Fortunately he used to work as a police dispatcher, so he set about relaying the emergency calls by cellphone to the police.

  112. Guys, you're missing the -issue- here! by trezor · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know this is /. and that the first person to post an offtopic remark, will spawn at least a 100 others, drowning the actual issue.

    Yes, I know this, because it happens every single time.

    But can we for the good of whatever good for once just focus on the real issue at hand here:

    How can we blame this on sitefinder?!?

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  113. You're missing the point entirely. by raehl · · Score: 1

    That the new competitor has to run at a loss for a while is evidence that competition works, not evidence to the contrary. Why do you think Qwest's service only costs a few dollars more than Cox's service?

    Whether or not Cox can compete successfully isn't the point. The fact that Cox can enter the business at all forces Qwest to charge rates that are just barely profitable to prevent new competitors from stealing their customers. If new competitors were just prohibited from entering the market in the first place, Qwest could charge prices that were very handsomely profitable, because they wouldn't have to worry about someone undercutting them by a significant margin.

  114. let's outsource by timlyg · · Score: 0

    another good point for outsourcing

    See ya, I'm going to india

  115. Won't somebody please think about the children!? by blorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, parent was referring to fire drills *in schools*. I don't think it hurts to be clear in these things - it's entirely possible that a young child would find 9-1-1 clearer than 9-11. We're not born with these skills, you know.

  116. That partner tag never actually worked... by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...and in any case, it's now obsolete.

    There used to be a code in NY Times URLs that allowed entry without registration. Google News included this code for NY Times links. This code was specific to each story, probably some sort of hash. The whole 'you can add partner=SLASHDOT' thing was a joke - the point being that the reg-free entry mechanism didn't look at the partner parameter at all, but only considered the code. The upside was that once you had this URL you could paste it anywhere and it would work.

    Now it appears that they are just checking the HTTP referer (sic) header against an approved list - which means no more 'reg-free' links for /. On the other hand, they might very well add slashdot.org to the approved referer list if asked, which would get rid of the whole problem.

  117. Glenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a cute little bunny, though.

  118. Hey! I resemble that remark! by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    I almost cut off my thumb once. Well... actually trimmed my thumb nail a bit too close, but I didn't know that until the doctors looked at it.

    Anyhow, I dialed 9-1-1, or something like that. I was kind of panicky. So, anyway, 4-1-1 (which is what I dialed) put me through to 9-1-1.

    Maybe I can get my Mensa membership converted to Densa. Whadayathink?

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  119. And whose fault was that? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    For a while, 911 was the only number you could even *find* for some police/sherriff departments. That could be a chicken and egg situation, but nevertheless, it existed.

    They haven't done a very good job around central Texas of telling folks about 311, either. Most people seem to find out by accident...