Slashdot Mirror


Mandrakelinux 10 Official Released

boklm writes "Two months after the Mandrakelinux 10.0 Community release, the enhanced and polished 'Mandrakelinux 10.0 Official release' has been announced. Download ISOs are available today for Club members and packs are also avaible on MandrakeStore." As Shipud puts it, "USB2 support... vive 2.6.3 !!"

322 comments

  1. ISO by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I need Mandrake ISO's but I don't want to pay to be in the club. Where can I get some?

    1. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wait a couple of weeks and they'll be available to non-club folks.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:ISO by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Torrents will be out soon. IRC a couple hours later.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    3. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or an hour or so for the torrent.

    4. Re:ISO by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Shh! You'll upset the hypocrites.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:ISO by reaper20 · · Score: 1

      Then go snag the sources and build it yourself.

    6. Re:ISO by tkittel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > I have to wait for community written software in
      > the form of an ISO because I am poor? Isn't that
      > creating false scarcity? Information wants to be
      > "free". Charge for support, not our software.

      The "support" in this case is that mandrake took the time to put all the bits and pieces together.

      And not to be rude, but please dont make it sound like having to wait a few weeks for a cutting edge distribution is a great injustice. You still get it for FREE, even though mandrake put millions into it.

    7. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Information doesn't wanna be anthropomorphized... that fucking quote was lame when it was invented, and it's lame now.

      And they are largely defraying distribution costs by doing it this way.

      And they are doing more than just shipping community software. Mandrake adds a decent amount of customization to linux. Don't like it? then go do a Linux From Scratch install or something.

      And they are not depriving you of anything, just saying wait a bit, or pay a price to cut in line.

      Yes, Virginia, there are costs associated with the world, and No, "But I don't like that" isn't a valid reason to ignore those costs.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    8. Re:ISO by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't want the do it myself. I want the ISO's of the free software that they have. Information and software wants to be free. Freely available. How is this keeping with the "community" spirit?

    9. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmm.

      I want a hot japanese woman to appear in my office RIGHT NOW!

      DAMNIT, I'm SERIOUS!

      Fuck, guess "I Want" doesn't work...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    10. Re:ISO by donbrock · · Score: 1

      Just go to the Mandrake website http://www.mandrakelinux.com/ and click on download. It looks like anyone can go right to one of the download mirrors. However, as of right now, the only mirrors are European servers.

    11. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You have the rights to the source if you buy the binaries, read and understand the GPL. That does not mean that a distributor is under obligation to give you free binaries. Of course, since the source is available to end users, that makes it likely that someone will distribute their own binaries if the original distributor doesn't.

    12. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's OK because they need to cover their production costs and bandwidth.

      There's no causation between slogans and logic, friend... ya need a better reason than that (or am I just troll feeding?)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    13. Re:ISO by Proud+like+a+god · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mandrakelinux 10.0 Community ISO images for i586 and higher

      Not the Official edition I'm afraid.

    14. Re:ISO by MatthewB79 · · Score: 1

      That's a list of mirrors for Mandrake 10.0 Community, which is a month-old beta. Right now, Mandrake 10.0 Official is only available from Mandrake to MandrakeClub members via club-only mirrors.

    15. Re:ISO by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is call the right number and that will happen. It will cost you though.

    16. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You still get it for FREE, even though mandrake put millions into it.

      Millions? Millions of what? Mandrake just came out of bankruptcy not that long ago. Where'd you come up with "millions"?

      I'm not saying they don't put a lot into it, but millions is a bit "fuzzy" all by itself, and needs to be qualified as well as accountable.

      Millions? Of what? Lines of SCO code?

      I'm kidding! Don't go wasting your mod points 'cause a joke ticked you off. Go mod somebody else up for being insightful or interesting instead.

    17. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information wants to cost $699.

    18. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Good point. Will it help if I post "Hot Women want to be free!" a few times? :)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    19. Re:ISO by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but only because hot asian women are physically scarce, and would rather be doing something else. :)

      If you want it for freeFreeFREE then I'm afraid you'll have to wait a few years for a real-world nano-assembled sexbot copy with bimbo-brain_v1.0, or a simulated "Matrix chick".

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    20. Re:ISO by tkittel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      But they are creating artifical scarcity by limiting the release of the ISO's to a few who paid money. They are depriving me of access to the information (ISO's) because I do not want to join the "club" and pay a fee.. How is this OK? Information wants to be free!

      Newsflash: Information is not sentient and doesn't want anything. Repeating something ad nauseum doesn't make it true. Not even if RMS thinks so.

      Despite the great efforts Mandrake takes to only ship GPL'ed software and providing the results of their hard labor for free, some people will always complain.

      Let me ask you this: What did YOU contribute to the open source world (or free software, since you are parrotting RMS). And if you did contribute anything significant, where can I download it (using bandwidth that YOU paid for). And where can I go and bitch and complain if it doesn't live up to my ethical standards?

    21. Re:ISO by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      You don't have to. Just click "Already paid or planning to play" or something of that sort.

      What exactly is different in this version? I haven't ran it yet, but maybe that's the reason why my last version of 10.0 would not allow me to get online with my laptop... Hopefully this will work though. o_O

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    22. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you'll have to wait a few years for a real-world nano-assembled sexbot copy with bimbo-brain_v1.0, or a simulated "Matrix chick".

      Does this mean man woman will finally work?

    23. Re:ISO by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a developer with a package included with Mandrake, at first I felt a little uncomfortable with the idea that I myself had no easy way to download or look at their RPM of my software. (I run FreeBSD, and am not a Mandrake Club member.) But once I stopped and thought about it, it didn't seem like a problem. The GPL says my code is free as in speech, but it doesn't say it has to be free as in beer. The guy who did the packaging was very helpful and responsive on the one occasion when I got in touch with him. (They'd previously packaged a version of my software that I myself hadn't tested carefully enough, and that had a nasty bug.) They're actually doing a more careful job of packaging it and keeping up to date than some other third-party packagers. My attitude at this point is Viva Mandrake! -- Mandrake was the first Linux distro I actually succeeded in installing, and I think they play a valuable role for people who want an OS that Just Works.

    24. Re:ISO by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Ok, Mr. Thurrot... we got the message (it's a prank!) ;-) very funny, I appreciate... tnx... love it! Really... soo funny... btw, d'ya know some website I can dl some MS LH iso?

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    25. Re:ISO by clacasse · · Score: 1

      anthropomorphized?!?!?!? That's not even a word. Have you ever heard of anything being morphized?

    26. Re:ISO by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      when I call someone a m #@#$$@# cker, I don't really mean they have sex with mothers.
      It means the person is a jerk.

      When someone says information wants to be free, it is summing up an idea in a nice compact way.
      I would explain the idea but I just realized...oh God, did I actually respond to your troll. uugh.

    27. Re:ISO by inflex · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with your sentiment. As a developer of a couple of OpenSource projects (BSD licenced though), it drives me insane that I get emails with comments like "Hi, I like your program but it sucks because it doesn't do precisely what I want - please FIX your program". Wonderful.

      Incidently, I don't want to start a war here but one thing I have noticed is that /commercial/ people, ie people incorportating my software into their commercial software tend to be far more useful, friendly and courtious, perhaps because, ironically, they see the real value of the software - as apposed to thinking it's some right of theirs to have it.

      I probably should wake up a bit more before I click [SUBMIT]

    28. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, is it the request or the tone that is irritating? For example, if I said "your app is great, but I use [insert protocol here] and it doesn't seem to be supported. Is there any chance that you could add it?", is that ok?

      And I second you on the courtesy opinion. Even if the developer gets no money, he/she spent some time writing and thus deserves appreciation.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    29. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Freely available" and "freely available in the particular form that I want it" are two different things. You have two choices. Wait for it to be released to you in the form you would like it or make it on your own. It doesn't matter which you choose, as long as you shut the fuck up and quit your whining.

    30. Re:ISO by Rockin'+Az · · Score: 1
      While it's been a while since I had a good read of RMS, I'm not even sure he would object to this. After all (please correct me if I'm wrong), any club member is free to put the iso images on their own web server for further redistribution.

      The last I read, RMS did not object to the "selling" of software whatsoever - he used to sell emacs on magnetic tape for about $150 if I remember rightly.

      Mandrake don't limit further redistribution, so I don't think there is any problem with what Mandrake are doing even from an RMS perspective.

      Of course - I'm not RMS and his opinions may radically differ from mine ;)

      --

      I come from a LAN down under

      Where the packets flow and routers chunder

    31. Re:ISO by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hah, caught ya hook line and sinker. I dont contribute to OSS because the idea of working for corporations (Mandrake, Redhat, etc) for free is stupid.

    32. Re:ISO by inflex · · Score: 1

      It's the tone. To be fair, I have no lack of well formed requests, much like what you offered as an example. It could be said perhaps that the tone of the request is highly indicative of the person whom wrote it. One could simply put it all down to social/diplomatic skills - something which seem to be lacking a lot in the IT world, perhaps people are spending too many of their skill points on their apparent l33+n3ss.




      I appreciate well formed requests. I do not appreciate demands. Demands come at a price, a price which must be paid for one way or another. No doubt I could rant on for hours on this topic.



      Regards.
    33. Re:ISO by objwiz · · Score: 1

      I'm with you that I dont want to play club price. But I decided too. Mandrake staff works hard to produce a distro that I make "heavy" use of. Therefore I decided that I should help support them monetarily. I don't know if I will allow by "club" membership to renew 1 yr from now. But I do feel that the contribution I made recently was well worth it. I definitely have gotten more from it and it would have cost me to *buy* windoze.

    34. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can download Mandrake 10 Official from http://www.loadux.com , it's a fast http server download. Enjoy :o)

    35. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can download Mandrake 10 Official from http://www.loadux.com , it's a fast http server download. Enjoy :o)

    36. Re:ISO by dj245 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Want Mandrake Linux 10 Now? So do millions of other people. Join the club.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    37. Re:ISO by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      ebay.com - I think you get them for about $5 with shipping.

    38. Re:ISO by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Of course he wouldn't object. People have some bizarre idea that RMS is like "out to get!" all those that don't follow Free Software guidelines! He's not. And he has nothing against people selling Free Software for money anyway: he explicitly states that. He started an interesting project, he likes it, he believes other people should follow it, he writes about why they should, and that's about as far as it goes. Do people hear "RMS is crazy!" and they just believe it? People should find someone else to project an "other" for them to deride onto, or maybe just relax in general.

    39. Re:ISO by typobox43 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Join the club. I hope you realize the irony in that statement.

    40. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Nah, I wasn't trolling, I'm just tired of hearing that phrase used like some global justification.

      Of course it is a representation of a philosophy towards information. And if someone can justify that, cool. But just repeating the phrase to explain why "waah, I'm not getting something for free" is done WAY too often. Like I said elsewhere, a clever slogan does not a convincing argument make.

      And, yes, you did respond. If you thought I was trolling, why?

      (I never troll. However, I often have opinions that differ from the local concensus. Slashdot has a problem with this, I know :) )

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    41. Re:ISO by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      I agree with your points. He can pay up or shut up if he wants the isos. You point is well taken. However, the phrase "information wants to be free" is actually pretty accurate. Kinda like water seeks the lowest point. Water doesnt seek anything. Its just an....nevermind.

    42. Re:ISO by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      What about those of us who want to try the OS out before we pay for it? Some of us would like to make sure the OS works 100% on our systems before shelling out cash. Sidenote: I've paid for RedHat and Debian CD's and paid for Mandrake, I'm just saying though..

    43. Re:ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you did not, you accually showed your own falseness. You want it but you don't want to contribute to it. You try to justify that in some misused quote that you don't understaind.
      Your lame and a user. You are on the same level as a script kiddie.

    44. Re:ISO by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      anthropomorphized?!?!?!? That's not even a word. Have you ever heard of anything being morphized?

      Hmmm, let's see. Anthro means human, as in anthropology = study of humans. So Anthropomorphized should mean "morph to human", right?

      First place I ever encountered that word (and I had to look it up) was in The Satanic Bible. ;) Enjoy!

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    45. Re:ISO by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I dont contribute to OSS because the idea of working for corporations (Mandrake, Redhat, etc) for free is stupid.

      So give your money directly to the developers, eh? But that won't entitle you to download Mandrake 10 before it hits general availability. Your argument is pointless because fuckin' nobody says "I'll write some open source software so Mandrake, RedHat, IBM, et al, can wrap it up and sell it and I get nothing." If that's your only sticking point on contributing to open source software, I suggest you take another look at your value system, because it appears to be mising some things. Those of us that do contribute don't do it because we want to work for free, we do it for a variety of reasons, usually related to making good software.

      But I suspect that it all boils down to one thing that Dave Mustaine said years ago. When asked why he played guitar, he said something to the effect of "Nobody plays guitar because they want to. I play because I have to." Programming is exactly the same. If I don't write at least 10 lines of code a month (not a lot, admittedly), I get real cranky, pissy, and generally unpleasant. Same happens if I don't play my guitar at least once a week (if I seem to be cranky right now, it's not for lack of coding, it's for lack of guitar).

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    46. Re:ISO by tkittel · · Score: 1

      > What about those of us who want to try the OS out
      > before we pay for it? Some of us would like to
      > make sure the OS works 100% on our systems before
      > shelling out cash. Sidenote: I've paid for RedHat
      > and Debian CD's and paid for Mandrake, I'm just
      > saying though..

      Well, you will have to use your hunch, or wait a couple of weeks (...oh the humanity!).

    47. Re:ISO by wilper · · Score: 1

      So... basically.. some people pay for the privilige of betatesting the release before it becomes available for free?

      I guess Mandrake has to be something really extra for that scheme to work out.

    48. Re:ISO by hufter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but It's not illegal to copy it even if you're not a club member if you find it somewhere. But it's also good to support them, they were about to go bankrupt and they are still not getting increased returns. They've made a great distro with good hardware detection and nice setup interfaces. Still you can do everything you want the old nerd-way. I haven't tried the Official yet, but I assume the new releasing scheme will rid us from the irritating bugs that have teased us in the previous releases.

    49. Re:ISO by jimi1283 · · Score: 1

      This is true. I am currently downloading 10.0 from a FTP site that is not owned by Mandrake. I really do need to get a club membership though, I love Mandrake and we use it almost exclusively here at my company where we use Linux.

    50. Re:ISO by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the developers don't intend on working for the corporations (Redhat, IBM, Mandrake, etc) for free - but that is the end result. The executives thank you, they are reaping millions in options (Redhat CEO - $11 million, IBM CEO - $124 million). They have found the holy grail of every MBA: people who will work for them for free!

    51. Re:ISO by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Aw, as AC? that was funny! (not that Funny gets you karma, but still)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    52. Re:ISO by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Millions? Millions of what? Mandrake just came out of bankruptcy not that long ago. Where'd you come up with "millions"?

      What the fuck do you think they were spending to get into financial trouble? It wasn't clamshells you jackass.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  2. Damn Microsoft Ads! by jmulvey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I knew those damn Microsoft advertisements would crash Slashdot sooner or later!

    1. Re:Damn Microsoft Ads! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 0
      lol! did /. get metioned and some other site and suffered the /. effect...

      I guess its true. There's always a bigger fish.

      God Lord, did I just quote "The Phantom Menace" ?

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:Damn Microsoft Ads! by Kelz · · Score: 1

      *Throws the first stone

  3. Damn! by McLoud · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I don't ever terminated the beta version download! Damn 2GB download, now I need to restart it again :/

    --
    sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
    1. Re:Damn! by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm on dialup and just finished 10.0 Community three days ago....I feel your pain man...

      I think I'll wait for the retail version and show a little $upport for my favorite distro.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  4. Pardon my ignorance, by rdsmith4 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    but what is the difference between Community and Official?

    And did slashdot go offline in the past half hour? Doubtless someone has mentioned it already...

    1. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by jm92956n · · Score: 1

      The "community" is composed of people who have paid Mandrake for the privledge. Thus, for a monetary payment, one is allowed early access.

      Special treatment for those that have paid. Sort of like a frat, only without the kegs and girls and whatnot.

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    2. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by uloveus · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah it was down

    3. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by Anders · · Score: 4, Informative

      but what is the difference between Community and Official?

      The Official version is basically the Community version plus a few months worth of updates. Thus, the Official version should have the major errors removed and be Very Stable.

      Plus, the Official version is what you get if you want a boxed version.

    4. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by johncheng · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mandrake recently created a new category for their release called Community. The Community version has been well teste, and is supposely "good enough", but not "good enough" for production use. While this Official version is well... "better".

      The more I try to explain this the more confused I get. I think they should just differentiate their products like so:

      Mandrake DANGER-MIGHT-BLOWUP-EVERYTHING
      Mandrake IT-WORKS-ON-MY-MACHINE
      Mandrake GOOD-ENOUGH-TO-AVOID-LAWSUITS

    5. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by Proud+like+a+god · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're talking about the Club. The Community distro release was to allow mass testing of a usually final RC quality build, so that an even better updated one could be released a few months later, aka Offical.

    6. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone verify that "Official" does not destroy your Windows partition?

    7. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, I wonder if they've fixed the issues with ISA sound cards? When I tried Mandrake 10.0, it just wasn't able to latch onto my Awe32 ISA sound card. Both Fedora and SuSE had no problem with it, so I don't understand why Mandrake insists on making users fool with the 'sndconfig' utility.

    8. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by imr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      right now, official = community + updates

      in a little while, community unfreezes and gets back to be a testing version of the distribution. More stable than cooker, with less experimental stuff, but which could be less stable than the official, since bleeding edge stuff is tested there.

      I also remember, that community will produce an official.1 some time in the future, an up to date official version with all updates and more bleeding edge stuff incorporated into it, yet stable, like the 9.2.1 isos that were released some time after the 9.2 release.

    9. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

      It isn't fixed, because it's designed to work this way. Apparently detecting ISA sound cards caused too many problems for people, that's why they're only detecting PCI soundcards by default.

    10. Re:Pardon my ignorance, by VivianC · · Score: 1

      Yes it was. The latest group of Microsoft patches require a reboot.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
  5. Pardon my French but by JCCyC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will they offer delayed ISOs for the masses? Preinstalled Nvidia drivers, Flash etc. is a nice thing, and I can wait.

    1. Re:Pardon my French but by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1
      Will they offer delayed ISOs for the masses? Preinstalled Nvidia drivers, Flash etc. is a nice thing, and I can wait.

      Waiting may be the best strategy if you remember all the problems with the release of 9.2.

    2. Re:Pardon my French but by mpol · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "ISOs for the masses" consist of only free software. The nvidia and ati drivers are on the commercial cd's, and available as club downloads.
      Ofcourse you can go with the free download and install those drivers yourself.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    3. Re:Pardon my French but by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should wait for 10.1.... Mandrake seems to have problems with .2 releases, .0's are OK.

      8.0 - don't know, didn't use it.
      8.1 - solid (once the Invalid EIP init workaround for K7T266 chips was used)
      8.2 - flaky (on my system at least)
      9.0 - OK
      9.1 - solid. Excellent work
      9.2 - flaky

      OK, so I'm extrapolating from a single data point (me), but....

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    4. Re:Pardon my French but by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'll give you another datapoint. ;)

      8.0 - don't know, didn't use it.

      Same

      8.1 - solid (once the Invalid EIP init workaround for K7T266 chips was used)

      Most games didn't start on my machine. Most applications, however, worked fine. I threw windows out over this one.

      8.2 - flaky (on my system at least)

      Solid, but some games (like Armagetron) still didn't work at all, segfaulting on startup. I couldn't even compile them from source and have them work. Solid if I didn't do anything "extra" to the box. Started running as a server with this one as well.

      9.0 - OK

      Solid, everything worked, and worked well even when building software from source. I think they stopped doing their special Mandrake stuff that made the distribution completely incompatible with other distributions. Many redhat rpms also installed flawlessly.

      9.1 - solid. Excellent work

      Solid until I installed Macromedia's flash plugin. Then X became very unstable and frequently crashed, Mozilla wouldn't let me type stuff into the address bar frequently, and reboot fixed it. :( Frustrating. I could've digged deeper, but the problem didn't manifest until a month or so before 9.2, so I just waited.

      9.2 - flaky

      Very solid, I'm very pleased with it, with two minor caveats. You'll find one of them on my website in the article about Windows vs Linux Installation. The other is that when installing an rpm, some of them break the applications menu, requiring me to load up menudrak to take care of it. There's an update for it, I just haven't downloaded it. I'm waiting for 10.0 Official to be available to non-club members (and hopefully this summer I'll finally have money to join the club). However, the system is extremely solid. I've done some things to hurt it, too, and it's doing fine. Still running as a server, but no longer a production server (moved my website to a hosted service).

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:Pardon my French but by seguso · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's worth to point out that the free edition of suse automatically installs the nvidia drivers (and Flash).

    6. Re:Pardon my French but by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Preinstalled Nvidia drivers, Flash etc. is a nice thing, and I can wait.

      emerge nvidia-kernel
      emerge nvidia-glx
      emerge netscape-flash
      emerge realplayer

      Why wait? Go gentoo.

    7. Re:Pardon my French but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Waiting is what he'll have to do while it compiles for four days.

    8. Re:Pardon my French but by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Those are all binary distributions, but I see your point... ... that's what weekends are for ;)

  6. Just Installed by foshizzlemynizzle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Installation was a breeze. So far USB2 support is not bad, my USB2 HD is working as it should. Thats all I have to report, but I like this version much better than 9 so far.

    1. Re:Just Installed by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn, they dropped support for proportional fonts.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  7. Re:Internal server error by qewl · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder if they were testing Mandrake Linux 10?

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
  8. Kinks worked out? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    My pal went back to 9.1, because 10.0 was 'flaky', as he put it.

    Mandrake is just trying to trick people into thinking that it's OS X. It'll never work! Mandrake doesn't come with white spots!

    1. Re:Kinks worked out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps. Working out kinks isn't always simple. I had an ex leave me once because of my kinks. Something about not being able to share time with the other women or something to that effect.

    2. Re:Kinks worked out? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Was he trying 10.0 community or 10.0 official? Cause if he tried 10.0 official with all it's bugfixes then he's got a damn fast connection and can install/test it faster than a ferret on caffein.

      Think of the official along the lines of service pack 2 for any windows version, all the really major bugs have been worked out and you can install without fear of your hardware getting sucked into another dimension.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    3. Re:Kinks worked out? by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      Mandrake is just trying to trick people into thinking that it's OS X. It'll never work! Mandrake doesn't come with white spots!

      OK, I don't get it. What white spots?

      Are you talking about the first production run of the 15" Aluminum PowerBooks, which had white spots on the LCD due to pressure from standoffs behind the panel? I don't think that was an operating system issue.

    4. Re:Kinks worked out? by OwlWhacker · · Score: 1

      I'll bet he tried the 'community' release.

      Even though it was more of a release candidate than a full release, I was shocked myself at how terrible it was. I had problems installing it on a few different computers. I would have thought Mandrake would have at least ensured that the install process would be in working order.

      I use Mandrake 9.2, I've used Mandrake for the past few years. I feel that it's something I can recommend to others if they're interested in Linux, regardless of how competent they are with computers.

      Although the community release was terrible, I'm pretty sure that the official release will not have these problems. Put it this way, I'm sure Mandrake doesn't want to go into the red again.

    5. Re:Kinks worked out? by buchanmilne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even though it was more of a release candidate than a full release, I was shocked myself at how terrible it was.

      It is the first mainstream distro with a 2.6 kernel. That always means there will be hardware issues.

      I had problems installing it on a few different computers.

      Did you try the provided 2.4 installation kernel? Did you file bug reports?

      (Note, many NForce2 boards have issues unless you boot with 'noapic nolapic', at least with the kernel the community install CDs had).

      I'm pretty sure that the official release will not have these problems.

      If you had filed bugs (or searched to see if they had been filed already), you would know for sure ...

    6. Re:Kinks worked out? by OwlWhacker · · Score: 1

      I never got to install it.

      The issues I experienced had already been discussed in articles on the Web before I tried it. These are widespread problems that had already been reported.

      I managed to get the installation process started by booting via CD2 and performing various other tasks.

      I had other problems during the install (all the same on three very different computers), which were also reported by others.

      Maybe I should have filed bug reports, but when everybody is posting the same thing all over the Web, it makes you wonder if it's necessary.

      Of course, if everybody decided not to report it because it was so widespread, nobody would report it. However, I very much doubt that Mandrake is so sheltered that it didn't read this stuff on the Web itself.

      My gripe is that so many people reported that they couldn't get it installed, you have to wonder if the 'community' release was let out without any pre-release tests.

      Think of all of the bug testing that didn't take place because people couldn't even install it.

      I'm very pro-Mandrake, but I feel that the 'community' release could have been better tested before making it available, regardless of it's not being a full release.

  9. Oh, guess that explains the last 15 minutes by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    The slashdot crew was installing the new Mandrake on all their servers at once.

    1. Re:Oh, guess that explains the last 15 minutes by dragus · · Score: 1

      Will they provide a review?

    2. Re:Oh, guess that explains the last 15 minutes by strike2867 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You didnt refresh in the last 15 minutes?

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  10. Re:Internal server error by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I did, must've been /.ed

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  11. MandrakeClub users aren't too happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The MandrakeClub forums have been burning up with flames regarding the Mandrake mirrors being totally fucked, and the download "mirrors" actually being links to bittorrents. I'm wondering if that will hurt thier business so soon after getting out of bankruptcy.

    1. Re:MandrakeClub users aren't too happy by MatthewB79 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a MandrakeClub user, you have to send an email specifically requesting access to an FTP mirror. I still haven't received a response to my request after over 2 weeks. My biggest qualm is that the MandrakeClub signup page does not make it obvious that club members are mainly relegated to using bittorrent for "members-only" features.

    2. Re:MandrakeClub users aren't too happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      bittorrents are the best way to distribute ISOs. The people complaining about bt obviously enjoy having their downloads stalled b/c that is what bt fixes.

    3. Re:MandrakeClub users aren't too happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "please pay us money so you can upload it to other suckers who paid us money". I LOVE IT.

    4. Re:MandrakeClub users aren't too happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, you have to use a faster and more reliable service to download member features.

      The horror.

      I want my flakey FTP damnit.

    5. Re:MandrakeClub users aren't too happy by kirk1233 · · Score: 1

      FTP is far faster than bittorrent is you are connecting to a server that has the available bandwidth to saturate your downstream. I get 390-400kb/sec off of mirrors.pair.com from my cable mode connection. Much easier, faster, and more effectient use of my network resources than bittorrent. Plus FTP does not crash your average home routers by cramming torrent packets through it...

  12. Re:Internal server error by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congratulations, you're the 500th person to say that. YOU WIN A FREE PONY.

  13. Re:Internal server error by JCCyC · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it linked to itself? Major Ouroboros moment there!

  14. Re:Great, and I just got a new CD-ROM drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that case, I suggest you use a hammer instead of mandrake 10

  15. Never test on the release server! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Scared me silly.

    I had to turn on CNN to make sure the North Koreans hadn't nuked Des Moines!

  16. linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long ago by after · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But why couldnt they squeeze in 2.6.4 at the time they were getting ready to relese the ISOs'? I used to be a Mandrake user, but I got sick of the fact that once you install, there are no easely automated ways to update yoyr software. I use Gentoo, primarily because I think portage (I also use FreeBSD ;)) is the best thing since sliced bread. I also have the 2.6.5 kernel thanks to portage, and USB 2 support is better then ever.

    I really think Mandrake, LLC (or what is it?) should concider using a different package/software manager in future releases. This gentoo forums post even describes how to install the superb portage on other distros.

    Anyway, someone feel free to correct me or mod me down.

  17. Re:Internal server error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to know, did you actually count?

  18. Maybe not ready for prime time by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    All the reports I've had from people who tried MDK 10 is that you should stick to 9.2 for now, that it's not as good and/or not ready for prime time.

    That doesn't really surprise me actually : most x.0 releases of RedHat were crap too usually. In fact, generally speaking, one should stay away from brand new major releases of anything, until they get a chance to mature in the next minor versions.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Maybe not ready for prime time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny because I went to Mepis because I decided Mandrake 9.2 wasn't ready for primetime...

    2. Re:Maybe not ready for prime time by courtrrb · · Score: 0

      9.2 is a big pile of bugs comparied to 10.0 I've been using 10.0 since the betas and have had a LOT less problems than I ever had with 9.2.

    3. Re:Maybe not ready for prime time by BokLM · · Score: 1

      But here we're talking about Mandrake 10 Official.
      What people who tried it were talking about was Mandrake 10 Community. The goal of the 'Community' release was to get people use it and report bugs, so that the 'Official' release be more stable.

    4. Re:Maybe not ready for prime time by unmuzzled+and+mean · · Score: 1

      I'm finding 10.0 community better than 9.2. The improved responsiveness is real for a start. It hasn't so far fallen over on me. The only problem on an older machine was that it froze during install to XFS partitions. Using JFS seemed to resolve that.

  19. I thought it was armageddon by zogger · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..heh heh, no lie, slashdot goes down, then my gnomedesktop froze, then I lost my landline connection, within like a minute or so! Man, I whipped on the shortwave to see if I should duck and cover or what!

    1. Re:I thought it was armageddon by io333 · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, what's going on? University connection has been up and down all day, some cryptic email came through from the Uni network admin about a virus ravaging the system, some of my email addresses are dead, etc...

  20. mandrake vs debian by jacquesm · · Score: 1

    Is there any kind of objective review of these two ?

    I'm trying to decide on one to distribute locally.

    1. Re:mandrake vs debian by tkittel · · Score: 1

      > Is there any kind of objective review of these two ?

      I think both of these two nice distro's beat each other in certain areas.

      So which one is better will depend heavily on what you want to use it for.

      Personally my needs are better satisfied by mandrake than by debian, but as stated YMMV.

    2. Re:mandrake vs debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I use debian on systems that i don't touch very often. For workstations, and servers that need latest and greatest, I go with Mandrake.

      apt repositories can be slow to be updated, and you have to be setup for unstable to get the latest software (even for security fixes!).

      Mandrake's a bit better about getting the latest software available, except that the mirrors can be dodgy at best.

    3. Re:mandrake vs debian by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Is there any kind of objective review of these two ?
      > I'm trying to decide on one to distribute locally.

      For what purpose? Debian is probably better for production servers, but
      Mandrake makes a good desktop system. Either, of course, will do in either
      situation, but those are their relative strengths IMO.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:mandrake vs debian by tannhaus · · Score: 1

      Don't disregard SuSE. I know it's maybe a little dishonest to buy a box set and then burn and distribute the cds or dvd. But, I installed it a couple of weeks ago.

      I ran Redhat for six years. When Fedora came out I saw what it was like and decided to find another distro. I tried Gentoo first and hated it. (it took forever for them to update some of the ports).

      Then, I tried Debian unstable.(Debian stable is hopelessly outdated). Debian was much better as far as that goes, but the package maintainers really like to throw crap down the wire. For instance, they released KDE 3.2 but only part of it. When you did your nightly update you ended up with half of KDE 3.1.5 and half of KDE 3.2. Needless to say, KDE went boom. A week later, they still hadn't put all the KDE 3.2 packages up for update.

      So, I went to Mandrake 10.0 Community. I know 10.0 Community was a Beta. But, it just seemed like bugfixes weren't really a priority (unless you were a paying member, I suppose). I'm not talking about small bugs either. I'm talking about checkinstall not working on Mandrake 10.0 Community...and from what people said it hadn't worked since 9.2. I've only been running SuSE a week or two...so I assume there is a huge bug in the release that keeps checkinstall and god knows what else from working. So, if I had to pick a word to describe Mandrake, it would be "buggy".

      Now..thanks to a hard drive dying, I now have SuSE installed. It works great. I haven't had any problems. I'm planning on giving them money. I don't see any reason why a newbie would not be able to use SuSE.

    5. Re:mandrake vs debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't compare mandrake to debian, go with mandrake vs MEPIS or Knoppix. Debian doesn't even try to be easy. Go with something Debian based.

      I think of Distros like this:
      -Mandrake is easy redhat
      -MEPIS or Knoppix is easy debian
      -Vector is easier slackware.

      I could be wrong.

    6. Re:mandrake vs debian by opkool · · Score: 1

      There are a few "Mandrake for Debian Users" in this website (in Spanish, though):

      here here here and here

      Peace!

    7. Re:mandrake vs debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experiences with Debian was it kicked ass once you got everything working. Getting the hardware to work was like wrestling with an elephant. I never did get DRI working or ACPI. Awesome distribution if you don't want to run games.

      Mandrake I installed everything and it all worked right away. No complaints really.

    8. Re:mandrake vs debian by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about Debian, I've never gotten it successfully installed. I also haven't worked too hard at it. Mandrake is great. ;)

      With the next release I'm planning on mirroring the package repository locally and doing my software installs and crap from there (after I clear some space off my hard drive. I thought that 120GB would mean I had some free space...). In any case...

      Who are you distributing it to? Are you a computer store wanting to carry a boxed edition, or are you a sysadmin wanting to set it up for your company, or what? There's plenty of us who'd like to help you figure out what to use, but it would help if we knew what you were shooting for...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  21. it's all connected by Njovich · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot was down so some geek finally had time to do the work necessary for this release. Thank you Slashdot for helping us out!

  22. This is crazy...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MDK10 is still full of quite serious bugs, I cannot believe they are putting it out now.

    1. Re:This is crazy...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you did allready try this new edition?

      Wow, you're really fast man.

  23. Re:AHAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure glad *you* got modded down.

  24. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you tell by the version? I'm not aware of any distribution which has a Release > 4 that's not whack =)

  25. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is an automated way to update your kernel..cp /boot/oldconfig-2.6.3 /usr/src/linux-2.4.5 && make mrproper etc.

    The problem comes when you rely on the package manager to take care of stuff you ought to take care of yourself (my biggest beef with Gentoo).

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  26. My Experience with Mandrake 10 by newdamage · · Score: 4, Informative

    I downloaded the 3 ISOs for Mandrake 10 Community when it came out, and kept up with the updates throughout the next few weeks. I had it installed on an Asus L3C laptop that dual booted between XP and Linux. Here's my experiences:

    1. Install: rocks. Take note Linux Distros, this is how things should happen, enough configuration available, but simple enough to let it go and go watch Family Guy instead.

    2. Boot: One major issue, every time I booted it would alternate between thinking my Orinoco gold pcmcia wireless card would be not present, or thing a new one had been put in and try to reinstall it, this was a real pain the in ass, and was the major reason Mandrake 10 got booted for a second time (9.2 is no longer on my good list either) from this laptop. Maybe this distro is just better for desktops.

    3. Usage: KDE 3.2 is nice, I like it, but quite frankly, I think I'm still a Gnome person. Also, if all the drak tools worked correctly all the time, I wouldn't have a problem with Mandrake having their config files all over the place, but tweaking config files by hand just isn't a good thing to do with this distro, and therefore some things just don't work properly (drakconnect!).

    Overall, Mandrake is a nice distro, and is great for people new to Linux, but for more intermediate and advanced users, there's better things out there. Quite frankly, my laptop runs really really well using Slackware 9.1, Kernel 2.6.5, Dropline Gnome 2.6, and Swaret (using slackware-current) to automate the upgrade process. Yes, you have to get your hands dirty with Slackware sometimes, but at least things work like they're susposed to, and things that aren't there can be easily installed, and personalized shell/perl scripts are finally reality for those who want full control of their machine.

    Don't misunderstand me, I think Mandrake has a ton of potential and I really want to see them succeed, it just still needs more polish. But compared to Fedora and SUSE, I think Mandrake is the best jumping in point for users who have never touched Linux before.

    --
    ce n'est pas un Sig.
    1. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by rainman_bc · · Score: 1
      I think Mandrake is the best jumping in point for users who have never touched Linux before. Hmmm... Tried Mandrake 5 and 6.2 when I first jumped on the Linux bandwagon... I must say back then it definately wasn't for the faint of heart, and turned me off of Linux for a little while until I discovered RedHat 7.2... Anyway I may just have to give MDK another go...
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by hawkstone · · Score: 1

      > One major issue, every time I booted it would alternate between thinking my Orinoco gold pcmcia wireless card would be not present, or thing a new one had been put in and try to reinstall it

      Weird. I have that issue with the previous Mandrake. (9.2, right?) I "solved" it (loose usage, I know) by just ejecting the Orinoco card during bootup and re-inserting after it passed the eth0/1 initialization. Kinda stupid, but it stopped complaining.

      It does something similar with the floppy drive, though. I haven't put the floppy drive in the bay since before I ever installed Mandrake on the thing, and yet every other reboot it tries to install it or remove it.

    3. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

      I can't really comment about Mandrake 10... the last (and only) Mandrake version I tried was 8.2, methinks. Someone down the hall from me installed Mandrake 9 (on a Compaq Presario 1000x series), and the KDE login error happened for him. I agree with parent that Slackware 9.1 runs well on laptops. I've got pretty much the same setup on my laptop, and it works fine. I'll take the time to comment on the installer. Mandrake (I think) has always been the 'user-friendly' distribution. The install is very straight forward, and is very simple for first-time users. I didn't have a problem with the Slackware installer the first time I installed it, though. Mandrake is a nice distribution, but it's not for me.

    4. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So far as I can tell, the main reason for going debian these days (at home and I'm mainly talking about 'workstations') is if you specifically don't want to have your hardware set up for you.

      Some people really *do* want to spend all day configuring their NICs, tv tuner cards, soundcards etc. ;-)

      Mandrake truly rocks for its automatic hardware detection and configuration.

      I am an advanced Linux user. I have been using Linux since 1992. I work as a sysadmin at a web hosting outfit that uses debian almost exclusively.

      I use Mandrake at home because I work on computers all day.

      When I get home I want my computers to just freaking *work* and not spend all weekend configuring them.

      Mandrake is good like that.

      Mandrake is not just "great for people new to Linux" its also great for lazy but advanced users like me.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1
      2. Boot: One major issue, every time I booted it would alternate between thinking my Orinoco gold pcmcia wireless card would be not present, or thing a new one had been put in and try to reinstall it, this was a real pain the in ass, and was the major reason Mandrake 10 got booted for a second time (9.2 is no longer on my good list either) from this laptop. Maybe this distro is just better for desktops.
      Oh, just like my Windows 2000 machine - for the last few weeks, it occasionally starts detecting a "multimedia device" on boot (which isn't there and I haven't changed any hardware either). Doesn't get far in the install tough because it can't find suitable drivers. Weird.
    6. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plus, Mandrake is fast.

      Using similar configurations, Mandrake has been consistently >10% faster than Redhat (and now Fedora) on all systems I have installed it on.

      While Fedora might take 2 seconds to load the KDE menu, Mandrake opens it instantly. This is running the same kernel version and similar kernel configs.

      I've been using Mandrake on and off since the 5.x releases, when it's main feature was the much-hyped Pentium optimizations, and it has consistently been one of the most responsive distros around.

      Once every six months or so, I get annoyed with one buggy program or another (I steer clear of the bug-ridden drak tools), or want to try something different, and go back to Fedora, Debian or Slackware, but none of them are as fast as Mandrake.

      I use MythTV for recording TV shows, and only Gentoo results in lower CPU utilization when recording, and even then, the difference is small when compared to the difference betwen Mandrake and Fedora.

      So, I think that Mandrake has received an unjust reputation as a "newbie-only" distro. Over the years, I have tried every other major distro, and only Gentoo matches Mandrake's responsiveness. I don't know what the guys at Mandrake do to make their distro so fast, but whatever it is, I'm happy with it.

    7. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using Linux since 1992.

      I'm a Mandrake user too that has been using Linux since the early days, however I can't boast that I've been using it since 1992.

      Did you start using Linux once SLS came out in late 1992, or before that?

    8. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      I am an advanced Linux user. I have been using Linux since 1992. I work as a sysadmin at a web hosting outfit that uses debian almost exclusively.

      I use Mandrake at home because I work on computers all day.

      When I get home I want my computers to just freaking *work* and not spend all weekend configuring them.

      I watch over NT4, 2000 and Linux servers at the high school where I teach, running a variety of services from apache and mysql to FirstClass and active directory. We're almost an entirely Wintel school, sans a couple counselors and secretaries with Macs and our Linux servers.

      When I come home, I use Mac OS X because it beats Mandrake (or any other operating system) in the "just freaking works" category. I can play around with perl scripts or mysql in vi or work on schoolwork in MS Word or tweak photos for our website in Photoshop. I love Linux, I've been using it since '99, but I'm definitely in the "when I go home, I just want it to work" category. I honestly can't remember the last time my Mac crashed, requiring a restart. That's not to say Linux can't do this as well (or Windows, if protected properly), but Mac OS X does it out of the box.

      I am looking forward to Mandrake 10.0's official release - we've been using a variety of versions for our servers, and it's as close to "working out of the box" as any version of Linux has come for us.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    9. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "FirstClass"?

      You have my deepest sympathies.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    10. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Soft Landings from DOS bailouts" was my first Linux. :)

      I still remember sitting in the computer center all afternoon transferring the 5.25" floppies my friend lent me over to 3.5" floppies for my PC. About 40 disks IIRC.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    11. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making me feel like a newbie :(

      I didn't start using Linux until a few months after Slackware was started.

    12. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      or my winxp laptop that thinks everytime I unplug my usb wireless adapter and plug it back in, its a different device. Im up to local area connection #76 ;) linux is not alone in this regard by a long shot.

      same thing with a handspring treo. switch usb ports and it has to go through the install routine all over again. ugggh. at least jpilot "just worked", unfortunately my cheap ass laptop simply will not work properly with any flavor of X video drivers.

    13. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      "FirstClass"?

      You have my deepest sympathies.

      Yeah... it has its moments. For the most part, though, it's pretty stable - we haven't restarted the server (outside of the occasional NT4 patch and the death of a power supply) more than a handful of times in 5 years. It's not the easiest thing to configure sometimes, but overall it's helped our district save a ton of time and paper. Mostly I just get tired of people asking me to reset their password because they couldn't remember it over a summer or winter break. We're on spring break right now, and I know I'll have at least 5 requests when we go back Monday.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    14. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      2. Boot: One major issue, every time I booted it would alternate between thinking my Orinoco gold pcmcia wireless card would be not present, or thing a new one had been put in and try to reinstall it, this was a real pain the in ass, and was the major reason Mandrake 10 got booted for a second time (9.2 is no longer on my good list either) from this laptop. Maybe this distro is just better for desktops.

      Seems to be some kernel-2.6-related issue, booting on the (provided) 2.4 kernel doesn't exhibit this behaviour. In most cases, the problem under 2.6 can be resolved by placing:
      yenta_socket
      in /etc/modprobe.preload.

    15. Re:My Experience with Mandrake 10 by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Slackware was my second Linux distro.

      Then when Redhat came out, I decided that prebuilt binaries were a good idea since it was taking forever to compile emacs, gcc et. al.

      Then, when Redhat had their gcc fiasco, I started looking for a new distro. Eventually settled on Mandrake and havn't looked back.

      At work I use debian, except for my workstation.

      Debian is great for servers, but I'd never recommend it for home use, except by hardcore workaholic geeks with a penchant for quirky OS's.

      As someone said in some post on /. a while back "I want an operating system, not a religion!"

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  27. Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by Jagasian · · Score: 1, Informative

    I downloaded the Mandrake 10 CDs that were released about a month ago. The install went ok, but I was surprised that it was impossible to go "back" after most decisions. Upon booting the installed OS, normal users could not login to their graphical desktop. Trying to do so caused the system to attempt to run KDE... but then the screen flickered and returned to the KDM login prompt.

    However, root could login, but KDE was behaving very strangly. I even tried to make a couple new accounts to try again with normal users. Still, only root could login to KDE. I then tried to run urmpi so as to update the system, but it only returned cryptic errors.

    So I was said to myself "this is crap, next"!

    I then decided to give the latest beta of Sarge a try (beta 3). Sure the installer wasn't has pretty looking as Mandrake's, but it was an easy install... and better yet, the resultant install actually worked. ...never would have thought that Debian would be easier to install than Mandrake. Then again, Linux distros are changing very rapidly. The moral of the story is to be open minded and try out other distros.

    1. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mandrake 10...
      • No support for my Radeon 7200
      • Gives a fucked up login screen on my i865 video can't see anything
      • What the fuck did they do to the Mandrake Control Center? Why does everything have to have a "back" button these days. It had categories before and was great
      • HUNDREDS OF MB OF UPDATES AFTER INSTALL! Give me a break! Why don't you issue updated cds? I have a damn dialup connection, and there are so many updates you might as well forget it.
      I got rid of that trash and installed Fedora Yarrow. At least it WORKS AFTER INSTALL.
    2. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I downloaded the Debian SID DVD and Boot ISO, both wouldnt install on my system, due to driver issues. Mandrake 10 community saw my IDE controller and installed.

      Not everyone has the same issues on the same distro on the same hardware. I still cant get KDE to compile on my test Gentoo box. Fedora has issues with my USB mouse. Mandrake 10 community doesnt have kernel src to compile new drivers.

      I like to try a distro before I believe someone elses rants/raves. Mandrake and SuSE would be my top 2 pics for out of the box install with newer applications.

    3. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't set the security level to parnoid. Either that or you have a weird video card. I'll bet the former.

    4. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by ImpiousPunk · · Score: 1

      I like how people are pointing out the things wrong with Mandrake 10 COMMUNITY (aka beta, aka alpha aka NOT EVERYTHING WILL WORK!!). That is the purpose of the community release, so you can submit bugs, etc. And I second another poster, every user has different experieces with Linux. I use mandrake 9.2, had a hell of a time getting my Cisco 350 PCI card to work at the time, but Mandrake made everything else so easy for me, I didn't mind at all.

    5. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by BokLM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your comparison between Mandrake 10 Community and Debian Sarge is completly stupid.
      The fact that you got some probleme with mdk and everything worked fine on your Debian Sarge does mean it's the case for everybody. I can find people who had no problem installing Mandrake 10 and could not install Sarge.
      And KDE running only as root is not the normal behavior, you probably found a bug (or did something wrong), that's what the Community release is for : to help find this kind or bugs.

    6. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      This only happens on corrupt upgrades mostly. it will happen on occasion to a corrupt fresh install.

      I saw it once on a laptop a fresh re-install that wiped all partitions fixed it .

      Think of mandrake 10 as the change from windows 95 to windows XP. if you upgrade it is going to suck.

      kernel 2.6 is highly incompatable with the leftovers of the 2.4 kernels and installs your best thing with ANY 2.6 based linux it to format and start from fresh. which is not much of a problem as it's easy to backup your user profile in linux compared to the nightmare that is windows.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by opkool · · Score: 1

      Mandrake 10 community doesnt have kernel src to compile new drivers

      Then, am I dreaming or what? I installed the kernel-source package easily, using urpmi:

      urpmi --wget kernel-source

      And it is installed

      rpm -q kernel-source
      kernel-source-2.6.3-7mdk

      I needed the kernel source to install nVidia drivers. Now I can play Tux at decent FPS.

      Peace!

    8. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Upon booting the installed OS, normal users could not login to their graphical desktop. Trying to do so caused the system to attempt to run KDE... but then the screen flickered and returned to the KDM login prompt.

      However, root could login, but KDE was behaving very strangly. I even tried to make a couple new accounts to try again with normal users. Still, only root could login to KDE. I then tried to run urmpi so as to update the system, but it only returned cryptic errors.


      Sounds like you were out of disk space.I had the same odd problems with Sarge. Remember, root has a few percent of reserved disk space that others don't have, as well as the /root directory probably being on another partition.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    9. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Then, am I dreaming or what? I installed the kernel-source package easily, using urpmi

      The SRC doesnt come on the Install CDs, and the some public mirrors didnt have the SRC online last week due to a naming problem with the DEV releases.

      You do have to reconfigure urpmi source to a mirror with the updated src.

      URPMI works great, if the mirror is up. (-;

    10. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      kernel 2.6 is highly incompatable with the leftovers of the 2.4 kernels and installs your best thing with ANY 2.6 based linux it to format and start from fresh. which is not much of a problem as it's easy to backup your user profile in linux compared to the nightmare that is windows.

      Heh. How do you figure? I've got, oh I don't know, 6 kernels installed on my machine. 3 of them just plain don't work because I misconfigured them when I built them. Three of them work really really well. One is the standard 2.4 kernel that came with Mandrake 9.2, one is the multimedia 2.4 kernel that came with Mandrake 9.2, and the other is the 2.6.2 kernel that I downloaded from kernel.org and built. (I also learned the absolute best way to make sure you properly configure your kernel. cat /proc/pci > mycomputer.txt) Anyway, I boot into different kernels all the time for various reasons. The 2.6.2 won't let me set my IDE controller to DMA 100 or more so dvds run real slow (some don't run at all), so I boot into 2.4MM for that. 2.4MM doesn't have a working midi sequencer device for my sound card, so I boot into 2.6 for that. I know, why doesn't a Multimedia kernel have a working midi sequencer? Beats me. I think it's likely a *bug*, but why bother fixing it? I anticipate it'll be fixed in 10.0 Official, which I'll get asap. ;)

      Point is, I don't have any trouble caused by having all these stupid kernels laying around, and when I boot into 2.6 it takes great effort to convince me to boot into 2.4 for *anything*. dvd's? Why bother? Just watch one of the many .avi's I've got instead. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    11. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      Oui?
      Ah .. very well - i will let the sucoeurs download and do more testing for me :)
      Oh and while you are at it - make sure you have silver membership! hahaha
      (and I thought only windowze people were true sucoeurs, how silly of me!)

    12. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      I just installed Mandrake on a 40GB harddrive. I let it do the partitioning, using the entire disk. It confirmed with me to erase everything else and I said yes. So either the installer didn't correctly partition and so I didn't have enough space... or it wasn't a diskspace issue.

    13. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Simple One word answer...

      ALSA.

      the ALSA tools for the 2.4 kernel that came with yuor distro will not work with the ALSA that is in the 2.6 kernel.

      it is far simpler to backup your /home directory and fresh reinstall than it is to try and figure out what the hell did not upgrade.

      upgrading 9.2 to 10 fails 100% of the time when it comes to alsa.

      so simply do the easy solution and end up with a better system anyways... format-install

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Um, which alsa tools are those, exactly? I'm not having any trouble that can be blamed on those tools, and alsa 'just works' anyway...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by witts · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, always do a fresh install. Just for grins, I did a fresh install of mdk 9.1, then used urpmi to upgrade to 9.2 and it worked and I played around for a week. Then I decided to roll the dice and try 10.0 community. Due to flaky mirrors that were overloaded, it didn't install a bunch of software, BUT IT STILL WORKED AFTER REBOOT. I was speechless, I thought it was borked for sure. Then I changed my mirrors and gave urpmi another try, and I got 10.0 successfully installed.
      So, usually I agree with you & going with fresh installs, but Mandrake's urpmi is a winner and really impressed me.

      --
      pot.kettle(black);
    16. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm serious!) by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Well, considering very few people have seen this problem (I think there may have been one bug report, but no confirmations), it would have been nice if you could at least have tested some things (like, whether startx works as a normal user, what happens if you change the default desktop to GNOME etc etc).

      But, since you didn't bother to, we don't know if it's fixed, what the cause was etc etc.

      The whole point of the community release is to find these issues which only affect a few people (thus can't always be caught in the main beta test series), but you didn't even bother to take the 5 minutes to do so.

      Let's hope the issue doesn't affect you when you eventually get your sarge box as up-to-date as Mandrake 10.0 ...

  28. yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    uhm, are you just stupid or what?

    try mandrake update. its easy. painless. simple. a monkey could do it.

    if yer a little more clueful, try urpmi.

    mandrake has all the package managers that redhat has, and all the package managers that gentoo has, and all the package managers that debian has too.
    and some more.

    get a clue. try it. its easy.

    and to those people who say its not stable, wtf are you smoking? can i get some?

    mandrake 10 "just works"...

    1. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't fucking "just work" if the fucking update mirrors are fucking fucked!

    2. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      for more than a fucking *week*

      Actually, I managed to get them to work by exploring the ftp directory structure and figuring out where the links were supposed to go. It sort of worked well enough for my purposes.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frank Booth?

    4. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by Foktip · · Score: 0

      eh? it works with debian files? is mandrake still a dependency nightmare? does urpmi just use .deb files, or is it actually as smart as aptitude or portage - handling dependencies and sources automatically ??

    5. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      It's 'just as smart' as aptitude or portage. Still rpm-land. I can't speak for portage but urpmi, yum, apt for rpm, and apt "testing" for deb all seem to be on just about equal footing as far as available software... all are good but none are perfect.

      For instance, atrpms apt on Fedora had the full MythTV suite all packaged and ready. apt testing under deb had most of the suite but not all (although methinks that's fixed). urpmi actually had mixed versions of things floating around out there. They seemed to work together but it was just odd. However, Deb had gimp2 ready just a couple days after it went up while I think atrpms is still at 1.2 today.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    6. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had a point. But saying mandrake has portage integrated sounds a tad clueless.

    7. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by shmokey · · Score: 1

      I gotta agree I installed 10 Community and it was the 1st time I didn't have to fight make sound work properly, and video for that matter. It did just work out of box.

      --
      http://samtron.cjb.net
    8. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by Dave114 · · Score: 1

      Take a look, for example, at one of the latest KDE releases for example. Looks of distributions have released packages, even some gnome-centric ones. Where are the Mandrake packages?

      You might be able to apply some security patches to Mandrake releases, but the only package updates visible to me in 9.2, is a little bit of documentation.

      IAAMCM (I am a Mandrake Club Member)

    9. Re:yer really clueless arent you? sheesh... by someguy · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent down - mandrake update has not been working for over a week since they screwed up a restructuring of the update mirrors.

      Currently mandrake 10 doesn't "just work".

      Parent post is spreading misinformation.

      --
      A planet where apes evolved from men? Long live the apes.
  29. Difference between Community and Official. by David+Hume · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pardon my ignorance, but what is the difference between Community and Official?


    According to the Mandrake Linux Users Club Page, among other things members of the club are entitled to:


    • Silver members can download the first three ISO images from the latest PowerPack along with its numerous proprietary drivers and plugins.

    • Full access to commercial applications which are normally only available in retail packs. Over 130 high-quality packages built & tested for Mandrake Linux can be installed with a single mouse click. Applications include easy-to-use web browser plugins, Java, powerful commercial applications and demo versions, software drivers, and lots more


    (emphasis in original). Thus it appears that at least one of the differences between Communty and Official is that the latter contains proprietary software and drivers that need not and cannot be distributed pursuant to the GPL or other Open Source license.

    1. Re:Difference between Community and Official. by Proud+like+a+god · · Score: 1

      The Club access to early 'private' torrent links and bonus cds is seperate to the new distro release process.
      Basically the Community release was as the 9.2 final release, but a few months later a new Official release is generated from the Community+new bug fixes/updates, and is intended to be even better and thus worth the wait and effort to test the Community release by all (it's public links are posted a while after the Club members get their early viewings).

    2. Re:Difference between Community and Official. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1







        • Thanks.





    3. Re:Difference between Community and Official. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use more whitespace next time!

    4. Re:Difference between Community and Official. by Windsurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thus it appears that at least one of the differences between Communty and Official is that the latter contains proprietary software and drivers that need not and cannot be distributed pursuant to the GPL or other Open Source license.

      Not quite. There are two "editions" of both Community and Official, the Download edition (available to everyone) and the Powerpack edition (only available to silver members and above, and contaning the proprietary software you mentioned). So everyone will be able to get Community Download and Official Download (in a few weeks), but only silver members and above can get Community Powerpack and Official Powerpack.

      As others have pointed out, the difference between Community and Official is that Community was released as a kind of final, final release candidate, and once Mandrake were happy, they then released Official.

  30. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by proxima · · Score: 1

    I used to be a Mandrake user, but I got sick of the fact that once you install, there are no easely automated ways to update yoyr software.

    You mean like "MandrakeUpdate"? Or from the command-line:

    urpmi.update -a
    urpmi --auto --auto-select

    Just be sure to specify a good update source first, because the initial selection (at least in 9.X) are pretty bogged down. The updates are mirrored all over the place though.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  31. Torrent by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    Anyone got a link to a .torrent?

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    1. Re:TORRENT by Dave114 · · Score: 1

      For all those attempting to sneak around Mandrake's attempt to force you to register for the club to get immediate access to the ISOs... I figured that I would mention that this is the older "Community" release not the new "Official" one.

    2. Re:Torrent by Kelz · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be modded up, most peeps will miss it..

    4. Re:Torrent by colinguthrie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I presume this is the "community" torrent from a month or two ago, not todays "official" release. I'd make 100% sure before you waste 2 Gigs of download bandwidth.

  32. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by mz2 · · Score: 1

    Ahemm... Ever heard of urpmi? I myself have not a long background with Mandrake, but for the latest month that I've been using Mandrake 10, I've found urpmi to be rather satisfactory (although the gui to it isn't quite on the level synaptic is for apt). It handles dependencies, repositories are easy to setup and it does its thing. Although the mysterious meddling they've been doing with the mirrors quite infuriated me (and a lot of other Mandrake users). So, try doing "urpmi --auto-select" and you'll find updating the whole system rather easy...

  33. Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Mandrake 10 Community was final.. i dled it last month and am using it.. how different is this release? I'm new to linux so i wont be able to upgrade ill just wipe and install fresh but i dont want to, i got everything the way i want it. waaaaaaa

    1. Re:Huh?! by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      Here is a suggestion:
      1. if you have the disk space set up for several installs (say more than 40G).
        • /boot -128 M ext3
        • /alt/boot - 128 M ext3
        • / - 5G reisers || xfs || jfs || ext3
        • /alt - 5G reiserfs || xfs || jfs || ext3
        • /home - all the rest as one of the 3 fs (if you go with ext3 consider turnging on the data journal ; the best feature in ext3 that should be in the others
        Doing this way, you can install an OS, and when a new one comes along, you can easily upgrade
      2. If you do not have the space for several installs, then make sure that you have a seperate home partition and it is where you put all you data and prior to doing a new install, copy /etc into /home (then you can check your settings later).
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Huh?! by selfabuse · · Score: 1

      I'm a debian man myself, so I could be completely wrong, but the Mandrake zealot at my work claims urpmi will upgrade everything to the most current stuffs very very easily. I don't know the syntax or anything, but I'm sure someone here will post it..

    3. Re:Huh?! by ShavedApe · · Score: 1

      www.urpmi.org

      tutorials and such

      the link at the bottom for easyurpmi has a great wizzard to set up updates. (just a little overloaded right now)

      i like urpmi on the commandline for now, the gui can be kryptic when something breaks.

    4. Re:Huh?! by MarkVVV · · Score: 2, Informative

      urpmi.update -a (similar to 'apt-get update') then urpmi --auto-select (similar to 'apt-get dist-upgrade') no, you don't need to thank me :)

    5. Re:Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just launch the control panel, run the update tool. Sorted.

  34. Re:?wtf by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Mandrake 10 announce, just after slashdot goes off line. I guess that they were updating the system.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  35. Re:Am I missing something? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    The "Community" is more like an advance release candidate. It was patched, but fixed, and became the Official.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  36. I have a problem with it. by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am a silver member. I have been for some time. I am currently running 10.0 community on several of my systems so that I could at least help debug. Now, it appears that a silver member will only get you a desktop, not the real core. No APache. No hylafax. No kolab. No DB (postgres or mysql). Nothing.

    Is there anybody here from mandrake who can help explain why it appears that those of us who helped bring you out of bankruptcy are suddenly being screwed?

    I will be downloading it, but if the web page was correct about this, then I will be canceling the membership and turning 10 families on over to a different distro. Hopefully, it it just a screw up in how things are presented.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:I have a problem with it. by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you talking about? Even the public ISOs have those available. Did you not install them when you installed Mandrake? If so, download them with urpmi instead.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    2. Re:I have a problem with it. by mpol · · Score: 5, Informative

      10.0 community does carry apache (apache1 and apache2), hylafax (and drakfax to configure it) and kolab. Also postgres and mysql are around. Maybe not all of them ended up on the iso's (but if so, then it should be on the 4th and 5th cds), and you can always install any mandrake package additionally from the mirrors, once they are functional agin with the new trees.

      I think you are misinformed in some way. What webpage did you read this?

      The official release is actually community with updates, and carries the same. If you have the commercial version (from club, mandrakestore or boxed set) it also includes ati and nvidia drivers, and some other commercial software. So if you are a silver member, you should be able to put your hands on these commercial cd's of the official release.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    3. Re:I have a problem with it. by Joe+Enduser · · Score: 1
      No problem here.

      I didn't bother to actually enter the CD's from the download edition upon prompting, but urpmi indicated that everything you mentioned was available.

    4. Re:I have a problem with it. by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you are misinformed in some way. waht webpage did you read this?

      Here is the sites comparisions.
      Here is the official club day
      And here is from my e-mail:
      - Silver Members and above: Immediate access to 5 Mandrakelinux 10.0
      Official PowerPack CD ISO images which includes three Install CDs plus
      two additional CDs of extra applications


      - Gold Members and above: Immediate access to 7 Mandrakelinux 10.0
      Official PowerPack+ CD ISO images which includes three Install CDs
      plus four additional CDs of extra applications. This offer includes the Kolab groupware server.

      It sounds like gold gets the power-pack+ while silver is simply the desktop version of power pack. Where am I wrong on all this?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:I have a problem with it. by KaiserZoze_860 · · Score: 1

      I have the 10.0 Community release. It has all of the things you listed as missing. Where/when exactly did you get your ISOs?

    6. Re:I have a problem with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the parent posting, it states that they are running community version. It is the official one that is being discussed; The same one that is listed at several places in the mandrake site; on the e-mail; in their downloads; etc.

    7. Re:I have a problem with it. by mpol · · Score: 1

      Interesting.
      I'm a bit surprised about the suggestion on that listing that the normal powerpack doesn't include kolab or other server software. I guess it's not included on those cd's then, or not all the server software at least.

      I only have the 3 free community iso's here, and they include apache, mysql, postgresql, samba, and I would be surprised if they would not be on official powerpack, but you never know.
      Kolab isn't on the community release, also not on the 4th cd of it. You can still get it from a community or official mirror though, it's part of that.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    8. Re:I have a problem with it. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I have all that on the community and as I said above, they are installed. But it looks like they are pulling a bit of a redhat here. I left Redhat becuase they were doing this same crap with KDE. And mandrake started due to this.

      I have no issue with not being able to get all the great commercial apps on the silver, but not being able to the OSS servers, well....Perhaps it is time to start my own distro. Naaaahhhh. But there are alternatives that I will be looking at iff this is really the way things appear to be.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    9. Re:I have a problem with it. by mpol · · Score: 1

      I don't think RHEL and Mandrake Official are comparable. You cannot legally download RHEL afaik, but Mandrake Official is available on the ftp mirrors. You can always mirror your own tree of it, and take it anywhere on a dvd or harddisk. Or use the makecd script to create your own iso's for cd's or dvd's.

      But I do agree that it would make sense to put kolab on all powerpack cdsets. I just hope the rest of the servers does/did end up on both powerpack packages.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    10. Re:I have a problem with it. by imr · · Score: 1

      He must be mistaking the boxes version like discovery and some packs, and the downloadable versions.
      Lists of rpms inside the cds:
      http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/distro/10.0-cty.c d

    11. Re:I have a problem with it. by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Samba, hylafax, postgres and mysql (and virtually any other server) is included in the 3 download CD set. Kolab-server (and the GUI config tools for it Mandrake wrote) are specifically excluded from the download CD as it is seen as a value-added package. However, it (kolab-server) is available on the FTP mirrors.

      Please check the *real* facts before posting ... (and not the press release).

      (Links to the files listing the contents can be found on the MandrakeClub article).

      $ grep -iE "(samba|hylafax|postgres|mysql|kolab)" 10.0-download.cd
      10.0-Official-Download-1 42843 hylafax-4.1.8-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Download-1 144636 hylafax-client-4.1.8-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Down load-1 343011 libhylafax4.1.1-4.1.8-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Dow nload-1 1007728 postgresql-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Download -1 1374169 samba-client-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-1 2165126 samba-server-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-1 3244793 samba-common-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-2 24491 php-mysql-4.3.4-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Download- 2 26466 postgresql-tcl-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Down load-2 140591 perl-Mysql-1.22_19-9mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downlo ad-2 213584 MySQL-client-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-2 261335 libmysql12-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downloa d-2 731916 postgresql-jdbc-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Dow nload-2 866338 MySQL-bench-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downlo ad-2 1066342 postgresql-test-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Dow nload-2 1314929 postgresql-devel-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Do wnload-2 3043337 postgresql-server-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-D ownload-2 5332585 MySQL-common-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-3 581656 hylafax-server-4.1.8-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Down load-3 716060 samba-winbind-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Down load-3 1437556 MySQL-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Download-3 1495433 samba-swat-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downloa d-3 5338633 samba-doc-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Download -4 15869 apache2-mod_auth_mysql-2.0.48_1.11-1mdk.i586
      10.0 -Official-Download-4 16629 prelude-manager-mysql-plugin-0.8.7-3mdk.i586
      10.0 -Official-Download-4 20875 gda-mysql0-0.2.96-10mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downlo ad-4 24908 gda2.0-mysql-1.0.3-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downlo ad-4 26276 postfix-mysql-2.1.0-0.20040209.18mdk.i586
      10.0-Of ficial-Download-4 28860 gda-postgres0-0.2.96-10mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Dow nload-4 31636 gda2.0-postgres-1.0.3-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Dow nload-4 35221 libqt3-mysql-3.2.3-17mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-4 40100 samba-passdb-mysql-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official -Download-4 41068 samba-passdb-xml-3.0.2a-3mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-D ownload-4 113629 postgresql-pl-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downl oad-4 346519 libhylafax4.1.1-devel-4.1.8-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Offici al-Download-4 452718 postgresql-contrib-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official- Download-4 845237 libmysql12-devel-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-D ownload-4 1012653 snort-postgresql-2.1.0-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Do wnload-4 1014587 snort-mysql-2.1.0-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Downloa d-4 1045166 snort-postgresql+flexresp-2.1.0-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Of ficial-Download-4 1046817 snort-mysql+flexresp-2.1.0-1mdk.i586
      10.0-Officia l-Download-4 1087022 postgresql-docs-7.4.1-2mdk.i586
      10.0-Official-Dow nload-4 1654389 MySQL-Max-4.0.18-1mdk.i586
      REJECTED master disc 10.0-Official-Download-1 (27) 8165 fax4CUPS-hylafax-1.23-1mdk.noarch (Some needed dependencies rejected: fax4CUPS-1.23-1mdk.noarch)
      REJECTED master disc 10.0-Official-Download-1 (27) 490278 kolab-server-1.0-0.16mdk.noarch (Explicitely excluded: kolab-server)

  37. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not the Official version you moron.

  38. Re:Internal server error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  39. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by donbrock · · Score: 1

    >I used to be a Mandrake user, but I got sick of the fact that once you install, there are no easely automated ways to update yoyr software.

    Hmmm, Mandrake has had MandrakeUpdate for every release that I know of and then there's the command line thing called urmpi or something like that.

  40. Life almost came to an end by Professor+Cool+Linux · · Score: 1

    /. Goes off line as posting of mandrake story goes up.

    Film @ 11.

    --
    Brought to you by _______ software
    " Censoring to best of _____"

  41. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by hazzey · · Score: 1

    That is what urpmi is all about isn't it?

  42. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by Yokaze · · Score: 1

    > I used to be a Mandrake user, but I got sick of the fact that once you install, there are no easely automated ways to update yoyr software

    What is wrong with urpmi? Oh, the fact that you don't get the newest revision of all software as soon as it is released as source? Then try using the Cooker, but don't complain about stability.

    There is a reason why there are point releases.

    > But why couldnt they squeeze in 2.6.4 at the time they were getting ready to relese the ISOs'?

    Maybe because they want to test the components before releasing them. And it is not like it is a vanilla 2.6.3 kernel. I'm sure there are several bug-fixes applied from the later releases.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  43. Re:Am I missing something? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    er, BUG fixed, sorry.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  44. Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just signed up for the Standard plan. Now I find out, even though I'm a mandrake club member, I can't download some ISO's. Only Silver and higher can. And the ISO's I get are the public release version. How freaking ABSURD!

    I'm calling my credit card and reversing the charges.


    The torrent files are ready, silver members and above may download the 3 first ISOs of the PowerPack (PWP) of that release (+ 2 CDs Bonus), standard members may get the 100% GPL 3 ISOs of the download (DLD) edition (+ 1 CD Bonus).
    Members with a Gold membership will get the 3 PowerPack+ ISOs and 4 CDs bonus.
    Corporate members will also get the DVD ISO of the PowerPack+.

    1. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, looks like I can upgrade my account to Silver or Gold and get the PowerPack and extra Bonus CD's. Still feel a little squeezed, but I do like the distro.

    2. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just signed up for the Standard plan. Now I find out, even though I'm a mandrake club member, I can't download some ISO's. Only Silver and higher can. And the ISO's I get are the public release version. How freaking ABSURD!

      Being a member means you get releases sooner, and you get better access to updated packages and custom packages. Generally speaking they only release bugfixes publically. Members get "real" upgraded packages.

      The main reason to be a member is to give something back. Free software may be free, but there is nothing wrong with pitching in some cash to help out.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    3. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by el-spectre · · Score: 0, Troll

      If it makes you feel any better, I believe that some of the powerpack and higher CDs contain some proprietary software which costs MDK money to distribute; Some of the cost gets passed on to you.

      Also (seriously NOT a flame) when I joined the club, it clearly defined what was in the different levels. Maybe the page has been rewritten unclearly or something.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by tkittel · · Score: 1, Informative

      Huh? I am a standard member and I am downloading the 3+1 cd's of 10.0 official just fine.

      Please go back and check the links (official is a couple of lines below community on the mdk club torrent page).

      Also, please double check these things before coming with these serious (and unfounded IMO) allegations.

    5. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      And the ISO's I get are the public release version.
      Plus 1 CD bonus, read your own text!

      You should be aware that any 'PowerPack' packages you're missing can be downloaded right from the special urpmi access for club members - just run drakclub to set it up for you.

    6. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      HaHaHa!!
      You sucoeurs !!
      So looks like it I will be wetting for Mandrake versión 11 oui?
      Vive La France!

    7. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      Uh, wtf are you complaining about?

      You get 4 cds. The only one that's left out is part of the powerpack, which is the Commercial packages cd (trust me, you aren't missing much. Silver member talking here).

      The general public gets 3 cds. That 4th "bonus" cd is basically contrib stuff.

      Club members aren't entitled to 10 million cds of download. Club members are entitled to downloads before everyone else, and get the functionality of mandrakeclub (the rpm downloads are nice). But honestly, the main reason for being a member isn't to get stuff out of it for yourself, but to support a distribution you like.

      If you don't like Mandrake, why don't you just say so?

    8. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      You know, generally speaking, before I spend any money on something I try to find out exactly what I get in exchange for my money. If I don't like what I'm getting, I generally don't spend the money. I've never had to reverse charges off a credit card. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:Mandrake is screwing over its own members. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I feel better all of the time that I didn't join the MandrakeClub. I LOVE the distro. It is my distro of choice, it has been since 6.0. I flat out REFUSE to spend more money on "free software" than I do on commercial software. I don't spend $120 per year for windows. There is no way in hell that I'm willing to spend that for ANY OS.

      This is NOT a troll, I am addressing the issues that have lead me to not join Mandrake Club even though I use the distro; mod me down, whatever, I have the karma.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  45. CD problem in 10.0 by jackstraw2323 · · Score: 1

    I can't get the thing to install since the CD insists that the CD isn't in the drive right after it booted from it(The erratta notes say try booting from CD2, no joy yet). So I can't even tell if 10.0 is any good or not since it refuses to install. 9.1 was fine for the install, if a little flaky in operation itself.

    1. Re:CD problem in 10.0 by OwlWhacker · · Score: 1

      It would seem that you have the 'community' release.

      You should try the 'official' release, which this article is about.

      Unfortunately for Mandrake, it decided to offer a pre-official 'community' release that was crap. Loads of people couldn't get it installed, even when booting from CD2.

      Ok, it's more of a beta/rc release, but I think it was unfortunate for Mandrake to make such a big deal of the community release. Not only has it caused confusion by having more than one 'release' of Mandrake, but this appears to have frustrated many people who were checking out Mandrake, and could possibly put them off trying the official release.

  46. Alarming Rise in World Productivity! by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 4, Funny
    Millions of hackers around world seen doing work. Sighs of "is it back up again?" heard in cubicles around the nation. Bizarre trend starts around 5:15pm EST, ends by 6pm.

    In small backlash, office girls around the world report increase in bad flirting by guys with dorky hair cuts.

    Meanwhile, Microsoft Super-Secret Tracking Server Explodes. "It appears that everyone opened Minesweeper at once", claims Steve Ballmer, "and all those Windows machines 'phoning home' about the application launch was just too much for our server to take."

    "We were damn lucky that Solitaire launches are sent to a different tracking server", he added.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
    1. Re:Alarming Rise in World Productivity! by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1

      Ooops, shoulda credited my friend LionsPhil with with part of that writing.

      --
      I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  47. Mandrake by KaiserZoze_860 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I upgraded to Mandrake 10.0 Community on my laptop about 2 weeks ago. The install was smooth but the touchpad was extremely over sensitive. I had to go back to 9.2. I'm running 10.0 on a desktop/server now and it works great. About the only valid argument against Mandrake would be the size of the install with all those automated goodies. I'll probobly grab the stable 10.0 ISOs once the demand dies down in a month or so.

    Right now they are heavily overloaded. As a side note, you can skip by clicking "I'm a community member or plan on joining soon." But I hope you find it worth your while to support Mandrake. A lot of work went into this distro and I'd hate to see them go back into the red.

    -KS

  48. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by gid13 · · Score: 1

    On a just-barely-related note, for those who like portage, but hate compiling, I recommend Arch Linux. Very nice.

  49. wait until 10.2 by ylikone · · Score: 0

    The 10.2 version will have most of the bugs ironed-out (before they come out with 11.0). The .0 versions are always a bit whack.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:wait until 10.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd normally be my advice too. However, for a .0 release things have gone surprisingly well so far.

      The only major bug I found (that was subsequently fixed) after upgrading from 9.2 was harddrake deciding to rewrite my XF86Config file on reboot (changing "nvidia" to "nv" and commenting out glx).

  50. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by after · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, I did not know about urpmi before Imoved to Gentoo. I guess this wont stop the next buntch of posters from telling me to OMFG URPM!II! ROLFLAMO, get a life.

  51. wow by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    costs more than OSX "Suggested Retail Price: $84.90 USD/79.90 EUR"

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:wow by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but you get it without the $2500 investment in hardware. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:wow by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      $799 actually, including OS X, and iLife. I'm just upset because I've got the older one with the lame Radeon 7500 :(

    3. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can you buy OSX Panther (assuming full version, not upgrade) and for less than $84.90? It is on the shelf at Fry's for $129.99, and the cheapest they've run it on sale is $119.99. Other retailers want more.

  52. Re:I was feeling a bit french there for a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did this experience cause you to smell bad, become extremely hairy, and develop a Napoleon complex?

  53. Worth a good look by twigles · · Score: 1

    I'm trying a few Linux distros out after 2+ years on FBSD and, when necessary, Windoze. Basically I'm doing the whole drop-in-replacement-for-windoze test, where I try and do everything the way a silly little GUI user would do it. Mandrake 10.0 Community was very nice to me overall. Nice to look at, I liked the programs, could do almost everything that M$ let me do just as easily, which is the key to breaking their backbone of abusive power.

    I just gave up on it though when I wanted to install the ssh.com client and the box kept rebooting during the compile. It also randomly rebooted previous to that, but not enough to make me leave. It was a beta OS though, so I'm hopeful and optimistic now that the real version is out.

    My goal is to get my wife (hates computers, Psychology major) onto a Linux box for her school career which REQUIRES that things be as easy as windoze. Note, I have no idea if this distro would make a good server, that's not what I'm looking for.

    1. Re:Worth a good look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A silly little gui user? Fuck you, snob.

    2. Re:Worth a good look by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      Dude, you have a hardware (cooling) problem. You couldn't get clearer signs of that than random reboots during compiling. This has nothing to do with which distro you're using.

      By the way, did you try urpmi openssh?

    3. Re:Worth a good look by twigles · · Score: 1

      No, this box runs Fedora now with no reboots during compiling. It also has a FBSD hard drive that I plug in for testing that too. No reboots. I'd say that means my Mandrake reboots have *something* to do with the distro.

    4. Re:Worth a good look by elflord · · Score: 1
      No, this box runs Fedora now with no reboots during compiling. It also has a FBSD hard drive that I plug in for testing that too. No reboots. I'd say that means my Mandrake reboots have *something* to do with the distro.

      I'd say that it's still something that you should check instead of guessing. Run cpuburn on windoze or fedora, preferably while monitoring your hardware (lm_sensors on Linux)

    5. Re:Worth a good look by twigles · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea. If I get any more reboots I'll do that.

    6. Re:Worth a good look by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      Possibly a bad sector in whatever slice you were compiling in that boggled the kernel somehow? Shouldn't really happen. It's not like there's anything special about compilation that it should be unstable on one distribution and not others.

  54. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or debian. apt-get install packagename

    couldn't be easier.

  55. Re:Internal server error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bitch!

    I know you used a script.

    With bugs.

  56. BZZZZT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Information is not sentient and doesn't want anything.

    Whaddaya think google is?!!!!

    "Information just wants your credit card #".

  57. Re:AHAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Netcraft confirms: Slashdot never goes down... (for very long.)

    Netcraft is your friend.

  58. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by tannhaus · · Score: 1

    If you installed Mandrake and erased it before finding out about MandrakeUpdate or urpmi, then you can't say you "tried Mandrake" and be honest. You didn't try out Mandrake. You tried out the Mandrake installer....big difference.

  59. odd screenshots... by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    i was looking at some of their product material on their web site and came across this page.

    i was expecting those little thumbnails to enlarge to larger screenshots - but sadly they don't appear to. for a company that appears to pride itself on the visual appearance of it's distro i think they let themselves down very badly by the presentation and architecture of their web site.

    so my point... it's all well and good to invest large amounts of time and money into bringing a good (from some of the threads that assumption appears debatable!) distribution to market and then not investing in the actual product marketing. personally i didn't feel compelled to even look at the product based on their site...

    1. Re:odd screenshots... by Die+Microsoft+Die · · Score: 1

      let me get this straight - you are addicted to marketing and expect to be coddled? good thing you didnt study much physics at a real top-10 university. i've got 50 lbs of junk mail you can have. that is from 6 months. i do not own my mailbox. you and your marketing buddies own my mailbox. PS i actually use mandrake. this is typed on 8.2 on a P1 and it works real good. oh sorry, no marketing, but i have kept one tough little laptop out of the landfill.

      --
      If you hate them, do it properly and hate them fully.
    2. Re:odd screenshots... by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      um, no that is silly and obnoxious assumption. i'm one of those mid-way geeks that appreciates both the technical and marketing aspects of software (and hardware) products. my point is that, in the world we live in today, people ARE influenced by marketing, brand, appearance and the like. i would LOVE to see Linux overtake MS on the desktop and my point is that if Mandrake want to get more penetration (had to use the P word!) that they seriously need to work on their marketing material.

      its a funny thing actually. i used to detest this whole marketing thing. i work in a software company and design all of or products. and i'm like, our products kick-butt - buy them. we were struggling to sell a particular product for quite a while and had invested millions of pounds in it's development. so we recruit this uber ex-Netscape ex-Sun product marketing person she just puts a different spin on our stuff: drastically re-works our web site, the way our product is demo'd and our marketing brochures and stuff like that and BAM, the product is selling like hot-cakes. so this last 8 months have taught me to not spit on the idea of effective marketing as no matter how good your tech is, it takes marketing to get it out there.

      you may disagree with that last statement because you may have been a unix user for years - as have i. but then i consider why i installed linux in the 1st place - and it was because people had told me that it was more stable and open than MS products. the fact that i heard it through word-of-mouth is indeed a subsection of marketing called viral marketing (word of mouth - like hotmail).

  60. My one major beef: by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

    1. My Mouseman Logitech cordless optical mouse was virtually uncontrollable on Mandrake, despite tweaking the settings for about half an hour to no avail.
    2. Installing programs lead to conflicts and dependancies and almost invariably it took me up to an hour to install one program, if I got it to install at all.

    So: Has driver support increased and has a nice simplistic installation add/remove method been created? That's what I need.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    1. Re:My one major beef: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you expect... version 10 and STILL it is PATHETIC at supporting any hardware within the last year or longer. Mandrake blows, i'll keep xp any day.

    2. Re:My one major beef: by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm doing. I struggled with 9.* for too long. It's not worth the aggravation.

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  61. What the hell are you talking about? by ThoreauHD · · Score: 2, Funny

    The missing information is only in your head.

  62. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    cp /boot/oldconfig-2.6.3 /usr/src/linux-2.4.5 && make mrproper etc.

    It's probably not a good idea to use a 2.6 config with a 2.4 kernel (not to mention that 2.4.5 is REALLY ancient). :-)

    Yeah, I know it was a typo.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  63. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cp /boot/oldconfig-2.6.3 /usr/src/linux-2.4.5

    Um, wouldn't moving from 2.6.3 to 2.4.5 be, like, a really silly thing to do? :p

  64. That's the BETA dipshit. by ThoreauHD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to confuse you with the various intricacies of software development, but before software becomes production- it is alpha, beta, and release candidate. Guess which one you were using? Did you report the bugs? Dumbass say what? No.. alrighty then.

    1. Re:That's the BETA dipshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree with you if it weren't for the fact that their releases are typically little improved over their betas and release candidates.

      They somehow managed to have half the apps segfault on a regular basis in the Mandrake 8 and 9 releases, whereas competing distros had no problems with something so basic.

      Mandrake produces crap and should have died gracefully after their bankruptcy.

  65. Who let him out? by CyBlue · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Mandrake official released" ? They should just thrown away the key.

  66. One Small Request by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    Could someone here post a review of Mandrake 10 Official that has acutally used it?

    For a point of reference, Community=BETA Official=FINAL.

    All I have seen or month old posts of how much the beta sucks. Any new information on the actual topic of discussion would be helpful.

    1. Re:One Small Request by zenyu · · Score: 1

      No one has tried Mandrake 10.0 Official yet.

      But, I only had one problem with the Community version. My kde settings weren't automatically updated for kde 3.2..on one of the two installs I did. There was another problem I'm aware of with the 2.6.3 kernel having a botched bttv, but the particular machines I tested 10 on didn't have that problem. (One desktop, one laptop.) The laptop was particlarly nice because I didn't have to jump through hoops to get cpufreq working.

      I don't plan on upgrading to 10 Official except for setting the update mirror to the correct location and maybe updating the keys if I have to.

  67. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
    Or Crux.
    cd /usr/ports/contrib/<port-name>
    pkgmk -d -i
    Or, if you'd rather have scripts do it all for you,
    prt-get depinst port-name
    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  68. Ahem. by el-spectre · · Score: 1
    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Ahem. by jgsfcaus · · Score: 1

      Don't anthropomorphize computers....they hate it.

      --
      Jack Greenwood Southern California Inland Empire Suburban Hell
  69. Seeing my chance here... by acebone · · Score: 1

    A bit OT - but still related...

    A couple of days ago I DL'ed the Mandrake 10.0 Community ISO's.

    I need to be able to dual boot with Win2K - but the NTFS partition fills the whole harddrive (40Gb).

    I have ample free space, but the Mandrake installer won't downsize, only upsize, my NTFS partition. I thought that you could resize both ways ?

    Any pointers would be appreciated greatly

    TIA

    --
    Check out my PHP Url Validator
    1. Re:Seeing my chance here... by cark · · Score: 1

      Try defragging your NTFS partition, if you haven't already.

      I could only shrink my NTFS partition by ~10MB when I first tried the Mandrake install, because there were some file fragments sitting out at the end of the partition.

    2. Re:Seeing my chance here... by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 1

      1) you have to defrag first

      2) nfts_resize is still a bit experimental, i think mdk's implementation tries to be intelligent before farking your data (as one might hope) so this might just be telling you that it wont work.

      3) you can try to partition-magic first, then install

      4) last option (assuming ironclad backups), is to let mandrake from-scratch partition the whole drive, but allow the first partition to be fat32 or nothing or whatever, dont give it a mount point, and let it be the size you want your ntfs to be. then install windows, this will hopefully (not guaranteed) only find the first partition as the c: drive or whatever, and install there. it will overwrite the bootloader tho, so mandrake will be unbootable. now use the mandrake install cds to just install a bootloader, since your partitions should already be set up correctly. pacakges can be installed on the first or second pass, your choice.

      hope that helps.

      --
      U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
    3. Re:Seeing my chance here... by acebone · · Score: 1

      Thnx guys - that's probably it... :)

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    4. Re:Seeing my chance here... by myz24 · · Score: 1

      you could also try qtparted. You can get it along with decent ghost like program called partimage at http://www.sysresccd.org/. At this site you can download an ISO which boots and contains the above mentioned programs. Read the site for docs but I'm pretty sure it can resize NTFS partitions.

  70. USB 2 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great linux is catching up.. it has usb2 support !

    and for those cocksmokers who wanted me to play and compile my kernels or let me do all the work and not have a distro that does everything for me... get f#$*(#$*(.... some workers actually dont have time to play with shit like that.. management wants to see results in the most little time possible not have employees do self productive activities and productive activities that would benefit the corporation.

  71. the short version by Apostata · · Score: 1


    In a nutshell, Mandrake is for people who want to use Linux for their needs and optionally learn about Linux while doing so, and Debian is for people who want to learn Linux for their needs, and use it while doing so.

    You can take a command-line, stripped-down approach to Mandrake, and you can take a "I just wanna play games" approach to Debian. However, Debian tends to be more aesthetically utilitarian while Mandrake is primarily geared towards Desktop use.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  72. Re:Internal server error by MarkVVV · · Score: 1

    sorry, due to huge demand, we have no more pony.

  73. last night.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... last night I noticed the net starting to get screwy, and I posted on it in another forum. I checked the net traffic report site, the usual security places,looked just marginally "wrong" to me, but not earth shattering like blaster yet, just... but it's jist weird, it "felt" wrong to me. It still does. All I can think of is that all the latest bugs plus the cisco vulnerabilites then the microsoft admitting to all the new vulnerabilites have given the mad haxors free reign and it's starting to show. Besides that, I don't know. We have the other article about the university linux and solaris boxes being tageted, perhaps that is what is happening at your college/area?

  74. Update procedure by MarkVVV · · Score: 4, Informative

    For everyone that is running 10.0 CE and wants to upgrade: urpmi.removemedia -a (clears urpmi setup) then urpmi.addmedia main ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/m andrake/Mandrakelinux/official/10.0/i586/Mandrake/ RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz urpmi.addmedia contrib ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/m andrake/Mandrakelinux/official/10.0/contrib/i586/ with ../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz urpmi.addmedia --update updates ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/m andrake/Mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.0/RPMS/ with ../base/hdlist.cz urpmi.addmedia plf ftp://ftp.pcds.ch/pub/plf/mandrake/10.0 with hdlist.cz and finally... urpmi --auto-select done ;)

  75. software needs to be installed... by Walrusss · · Score: 3, Informative

    hmmm... did you just try to install the packages first ? There is no such thing as a "desktop" distro or a "server" distro for Mandrake...

    Ok, you need to check the group of packages saying "Databases" to have the databases (like postgres) installed, it may not install MySQL by default, but if you go in your Mandrake Control Center, you can actually install that software (it even tells you which cd to install).

    By the way, software works better if installed... ;-)

    And I'm using a Mdk 10.0 Community to tell you this (yes, I have mysql, apache, .... all installed).

  76. Re: Sounds like a standard problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like your disk was full. So KDE login could not create necessary files and failed.

    There is a reserved amount of storage for root: so root had no problems.

    Out of disk space errors tend to be ugly and confusing. That's why root gets an iron reserve for fixing things.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. That's the community edition asshat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot moderators... that's the old community edition

    slashdot == ghey

    * OSDN-owned Slashdot thinks its niche opinion represents the majority of the world. This is a result of people visiting every day and buying into the groupthink. Nobody outside of Slashdot knows or cares about "Linux," "RIAA", "M$," or anything else Slashdotters think is such a huge issue in today's society. Go to a mall or coffee shop sometime and see what people actually talk about.

    * Speaking of OSDN--it's a Linux company...that owns a "tech news" site...that posts news stories negative toward competitors like Microsoft. If a Windows company or even Microsoft itself owned a "tech news" site and posted anti-Linux articles all the time, everyone would be up in arms. But with OSDN, it's a-okay.

    * Slashbots think people don't like the music coming out these days, which is the cause of the piracy. Never mind that if people didn't like the music they wouldn't be pirating it, most Slashbots--again, this goes back to the niche opinion thing--don't realize that most people these days love the music coming out and want to hear all of it. Probing around, you discover that Slashdot is made up of nerds and fogies who listen to things like The Who and Blind Guardian and techno--not what mainstream society enjoys.

    * The inevitable result of all this is a world in which nothing can be profitable because people simply pirate free copies. Is that really what Slashbots want? OSS and free-ness in general reminds me of the hippie era of the 60s--idealistic socialism that only exists because of the surrounding capitalism around it that provides the environment for it to exist. We all know what happened to that idea.

    * Slashdot editors are abusive. We all remember The Post. It's amusing the editors never mention the issue. The worst editor is michael, who will mod you down, insult you for your post count, and post unprofessional color commentary along with the article. This is the same bizarre person who cybersquatted Censorware for years--even as Slashdot posted articles negative toward cybersquatting! Michael played it off like he was some sort of stalking victim, which made it all the more bizarre.

    * Somehow, user-ran executables are always a "New Microsoft Hole" (actual article headline). Meanwhile, LinuxSecurity [linuxsecurity.com] posts weekly security advisories for all the Linux distributions. You never, ever, EVER see any of these mentioned on Slashdot--bizarre things like arbitrary code execution via MPlayer.

    * Microsoft is supposed to be some sort of non-innovative rip-off artist. Meanwhile, the same people posting those comments do it through KDE with taskbars, sidepanels, start menus, similar print dialogs, and an integrated web/filesystem browser. Slashdotters--ripping people off then criticizing those who came up with the ideas in the first place.

    * Linux is "ready for the desktop." This is the yearly uttering since 1998. Never mind that there is STILL no binary installation/uninstallation API for desktops, you can't come home with a printer and a CD and stick it in to get an Autoplay menu that lets you set up the driver. Somehow, Linux is just magically supposed to be ready--that is, if someone else sets it up for you and you never change or add your hardware or software and doing nothing else but check e-mail and browse the web. Conveniently, this includes grandmas, so people can post their grandma-using-Linux stories as "proof."

    * Corporate-owned, subscription fees, banner ads, reposts, and complete falsehoods. Remember when Slashdot was a great tech news site for nerds? Before the point of the site was to have an anti-RIAA, anti-"M$" agenda? When it was just about posting cool technology stories regardless?

    Slashdot is dead.

    Meanwhile 2004 Linux Rules the desktop when in reality: http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html

    Windows = 91%
    Mac = 4%
    Linux = 1%

    1. Re:That's the community edition asshat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we'd all like to see Linux, the open and free OS suceeed (server AND desktop) but I fear the Linux fanboys like you see on slashdot are setting it back more than helping, they are as much a turnoff as Linux's many useability warts.

      Here's another fanboy hypocrisy to throw out there, they celebrate Linux being free (as in beer and speech) but just look at their flaming in this Mandrake thread of people wanting to use it for $free. They want it both ways, they want Mandrake to make money and be a charity at the same time, that's the kind of atitude that is keeping Linux down, when you want to provide commercial software (as Mandrake does, they are NOT a charity) you have to providing value to the customer. Do the math on Mandrake Linux vs M$ Windows, Windows wins hands down, it's user experience, documentation, support, app base, compatibility etc. is still in another universe to commercial Linux, it even wins on price if you do the math(my Win2000 is 4 years old averaged cost==$25 year). Making excuses and flaming legitimate complaints is not going to get more people to use Linux, quite the opposite IMO.

      I hope the geeks/fanboys/apologists can get their shit together and help make Linux a real OS for the people because at this point unless the Novell/IBM's of the world can manage it themselves it doesn't look like it's going to happen in our lifetimes

      James L.

  79. Mirrors and Torrent by Kelz · · Score: 1
  80. Re:Internal server error by dj245 · · Score: 1
    >> Slashdot was slashdotted

    > Congratulations, you're the 500th person to say that. YOU WIN A FREE PONY.

    Should he not be the 503th person to say that?

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  81. That's not the final asshat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot moderators... that's the old community edition

    slashdot == ghey

    * OSDN-owned Slashdot thinks its niche opinion represents the majority of the world. This is a result of people visiting every day and buying into the groupthink. Nobody outside of Slashdot knows or cares about "Linux," "RIAA", "M$," or anything else Slashdotters think is such a huge issue in today's society. Go to a mall or coffee shop sometime and see what people actually talk about.

    * Speaking of OSDN--it's a Linux company...that owns a "tech news" site...that posts news stories negative toward competitors like Microsoft. If a Windows company or even Microsoft itself owned a "tech news" site and posted anti-Linux articles all the time, everyone would be up in arms. But with OSDN, it's a-okay.

    * Slashbots think people don't like the music coming out these days, which is the cause of the piracy. Never mind that if people didn't like the music they wouldn't be pirating it, most Slashbots--again, this goes back to the niche opinion thing--don't realize that most people these days love the music coming out and want to hear all of it. Probing around, you discover that Slashdot is made up of nerds and fogies who listen to things like The Who and Blind Guardian and techno--not what mainstream society enjoys.

    * The inevitable result of all this is a world in which nothing can be profitable because people simply pirate free copies. Is that really what Slashbots want? OSS and free-ness in general reminds me of the hippie era of the 60s--idealistic socialism that only exists because of the surrounding capitalism around it that provides the environment for it to exist. We all know what happened to that idea.

    * Slashdot editors are abusive. We all remember The Post. It's amusing the editors never mention the issue. The worst editor is michael, who will mod you down, insult you for your post count, and post unprofessional color commentary along with the article. This is the same bizarre person who cybersquatted Censorware for years--even as Slashdot posted articles negative toward cybersquatting! Michael played it off like he was some sort of stalking victim, which made it all the more bizarre.

    * Somehow, user-ran executables are always a "New Microsoft Hole" (actual article headline). Meanwhile, LinuxSecurity [linuxsecurity.com] posts weekly security advisories for all the Linux distributions. You never, ever, EVER see any of these mentioned on Slashdot--bizarre things like arbitrary code execution via MPlayer.

    * Microsoft is supposed to be some sort of non-innovative rip-off artist. Meanwhile, the same people posting those comments do it through KDE with taskbars, sidepanels, start menus, similar print dialogs, and an integrated web/filesystem browser. Slashdotters--ripping people off then criticizing those who came up with the ideas in the first place.

    * Linux is "ready for the desktop." This is the yearly uttering since 1998. Never mind that there is STILL no binary installation/uninstallation API for desktops, you can't come home with a printer and a CD and stick it in to get an Autoplay menu that lets you set up the driver. Somehow, Linux is just magically supposed to be ready--that is, if someone else sets it up for you and you never change or add your hardware or software and doing nothing else but check e-mail and browse the web. Conveniently, this includes grandmas, so people can post their grandma-using-Linux stories as "proof."

    * Corporate-owned, subscription fees, banner ads, reposts, and complete falsehoods. Remember when Slashdot was a great tech news site for nerds? Before the point of the site was to have an anti-RIAA, anti-"M$" agenda? When it was just about posting cool technology stories regardless?

    Slashdot is dead.

    Meanwhile 2004 Linux Rules the desktop when in reality: http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html

    Windows = 91%
    Mac = 4%
    Linux = 1%

    1. Re:That's not the final asshat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hate Slashdot so much, why don't you just take all your toys and go home?

  82. Who is this official and why did they release him? by Die+Microsoft+Die · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. 10.0 beta is a pile of junk. I just put it on a thinkpad. Pretty, though. I doubt they fixed it so quickly. 2. 9.1 actually works without the bug-family. 3. WTF is this "community" b-llsh-t? Sound communist to me. Like my apartment "community" where they keep telling me I "belong." The same guy owns 28 complexes. Oiy-vay, let's shoot some more children! 4. Maybe you mean "officially released." Has slashdot turned to hacking English? PS DIE MICROSOFT, DIE

    --
    If you hate them, do it properly and hate them fully.
  83. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Not even the whole installer, since the very last dialog tells you about it. ;) Personally, I've quit listening when people say "I installed Redhat and ran it for a few days...". I tune them out and wait for them to spiral down, and then say "You didn't try it, so don't waste my time telling me how bad linux is until you really try it, and no, dual-booting is *not* trying it."

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  84. Jaguars have white spots. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Jaguars have white spots. OS X is called Jaguar.

    1. Re:Jaguars have white spots. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      No. Just the latest release of OS X is called Jaguar.

      There are a bunch of names, for a bunch of versions, of OS X.

      I wonder what they're going to call the next major version. OS Xi ?

      Naw, they always put the i in front.

      --
      resigned
  85. Jaguar, Panther... by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Mandrake is just trying to trick people into thinking that it's OS X. It'll never work! Mandrake doesn't come with white spots!

    Oooh, OK, I get it now, someone pointed out that Jaguars have white spots and Mac OS X 10.2 was codenamed Jaguar.

    It didn't click because I've been using 10.3 Panther for about 6 months! :)

  86. ... and panthers have solid black fur by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Jaguars have white spots. OS X is called Jaguar.

    OK, no wonder I didn't get the joke... I've been using OS X since it was called Rhapsody in the earliest developer preview days. (Followed by "Kodiak" Public Beta, 10.0 Cheetah, 10.1 Puma, and 10.2 Jaguar). I've been using 10.3 Panther for about 6 months, currently using 10.3.3 (Darwin kernel 7.2).

    I guess Mandrake should change the default desktop to Blackbox if they want to be like OS X. Panther = black fur. Blackbox. Get it? *Ba-dum* *ching* But seriously, folks...

  87. mandrake 10 == stinky cheese! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modload &name=Splatt_Forum&file=viewforum&foru m=9

    Network Problems / Blank Boot screens

    hyuk hyuk

  88. SLack drake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Distro. authors didn't assume I was an idiot. (I did prove it to them later by paying for a silver level membership).
    2. Can configure, make, install, sources right out of the box.
    3. End of dependency hell.
    4. Wasn't mugged for more money just to make the BOXED distro.semi-usable.
    5. If I didn't want choices I would of stuck with windows.
    6. I can read a Linux manual and know that the information WILL apply to me.
    7. Can you say painless kernel upgrade?
    8. Can install sources and they'll work.
    9. RPM= Really painful manipulation.
    10. Don't have to pay to post stupid stuff like this on the Slackware forums.

    I thought I'd hurry up and post this before all the Mandrake 10 won't install, work, play nice with others,etc. etc. etc. posts drown it out.
    While you all are paying extra to get things to work (maybe). I'll be computing right along, $130. poorer, but oh so much wiser.

  89. Re:linux-2.6.5 is the latest, 2.6.4 but not long a by leadsling · · Score: 1

    "but I got sick of the fact that once you install, there are no easely automated ways to update yoyr software." urpmi --auto-select --auto (after adding an update mirror) It took me a week, but I actually upgraded from 9.2 to 10 Community this way via cooker. (I had dial-up at the time) Worked pretty well.

  90. Re:I was feeling a bit french there for a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know that Napoleon was not French right?

  91. Mandrake 10 CE by thebra · · Score: 1

    just mostly froze up on me, I liked the way it was setup looks wise but don't enjoy it not working. I installed Fedora and not a single problem.

  92. Re:Mandrake 10 Sucks (I'm too clueless) by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    No support for my Radeon 7200

    Maybe you needed to add something like 'intel-agp' to /etc/modprobe.conf to ensure that DRI actually works. IIRC this has been fixed.

    IIRC, you could also just have booted a 2.4 kernel until you figured that out.

    Gives a fucked up login screen on my i865 video can't see anything

    IIRC this has been fixed.

    HUNDREDS OF MB OF UPDATES AFTER INSTALL!

    Yes, that's to fix the final small issues people found (like the 2 you mentioned above).

    Give me a break! Why don't you issue updated cds?

    Uhh, you actually read the title of this slashdot article?

    I have a damn dialup connection, and there are so many updates you might as well forget it.

    Then, maybe you should consider only running an "Official" release of Mandrake. The community release of Mandrake is not really intended for people limited to dialup.

  93. Mandrake 10.0 *does* have a 2.4 kernel by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    99% of hardware issues on Mandrake 10.0 seem to be due to the 2.6 kernel.

    That's why a 2.4 kernel is provided. Booting the 2.4 kernel seems to fix most issues.

    Most 2.x.y kernel releases where x is even and y =10 are "too crap usually".

    Mandrake 10.0 official is quite solid though (IMHO).

  94. He meant to say black. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Also, one reason why people didn't get the joke is that Jaguars have black spots. He meant to say black.

  95. Re: Sounds like a standard problem... by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    I had over 40GB free disk space. There is no way it is because the disk was near full.

  96. Bug report by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    And, did you at least bother to spend 5 minutes filing a bug report?

    Fedora what? Core 1 or 2? If 1, maybe you have a kernel-2.6 issue, which you will discover in core 2.

    Probably your mobo needs noapic or nolapic under kernel-2.6 at present ...

  97. STFU raghead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn capitalism 101 -- the lowest price is the one people are going to pay for. It's what makes Ebay a success it's what is causing US jobs to be outsourced to India and it is what is making WalMart crush it's competition. If you don't want it to be free then charge for it fuck hat otherwise stfu and go fill up my gas tank stupid whiny fuck. aka gpl + open source == shit wipe
    PS I will post the bittorrent link for Mandrake 10 once I;'m done leaching all the cds.

  98. torrents (unproven) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found these on suprnova.org. Haven't downloaded yet. Don't know the quality.
    http://66.90.75.92/torrents/1616/Mandrak elinux-10. 0-Official-Download-CD4.torrent
    http://66.90.75.9 2/torrents/1613/Mandrake%2010.0%2 0official(1).torrent

    1. Re:torrents (unproven) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better link:
      http://torrent-xtreme.com/torrent-search.ph p?Searc hString=mandrake&SearchType=1&Search=Search&PC=0&p g=1&opt=search