Slashdot Mirror


Growing Teeth with Stem Cell Technology

davidoff404 writes "Lost a tooth lately? Well, a natural cure may be at hand. The BBC is reporting on a grant awarded to researchers at King's College, London, which they say will allow them to develop a technique for growing natural replacement teeth. Using recently developed techniques, stem cells can be programmed to develop into teeth, and then inserted into the gap in a patient's jaw. According to the BBC, the research has already been successfully performed on mice, and clinical trials on humans should begin within two years."

340 comments

  1. I bet they are running this operation at a loss by Novanix · · Score: 3, Funny

    This King's College sure sounds like a front for some true organ cloning, I bet they are running this tooth thing at a loss. Wake up Drucker here we come! Of course how will we tell the hicks apart?

    1. Re:I bet they are running this operation at a loss by TyrranzzX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, until you notice they tried it out on MICE first. MICE! Rodents regrow their teeth like nuts. Infact, mice teeth never stop growing, that's why they sell those little concrete blocks for the cage, so they can keep their teeth in check.

      Stupid scientists.

    2. Re:I bet they are running this operation at a loss by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 5, Funny

      Absolutely. These dumb fuck scientists don't know the first thing about how to do research! They could have saved half a million pounds if they had simply asked teh TyrranzzX from Slashdot first!

    3. Re:I bet they are running this operation at a loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now that's funny!

    4. Re:I bet they are running this operation at a loss by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Yea! They should hire me! The allknowing lord humungous of the universe! I could tell them a few common sense things first...the fuckin' morons.

      What'll they think up next? Cells to rejuvinate the brains in a plant? Wow, now there's some science. Plants don't even have brains STUPID!

      ;)

  2. Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Research on growing teeth? In England? THERE's a fucking surprise, mate.

    1. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by theMerovingian · · Score: 5, Funny


      I don't know how it is in the UK, but it can't be any worse than Arkansas teeth!

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    2. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Albanach · · Score: 5, Funny
      Research on growing teeth? In England? THERE's a fucking surprise, mate.

      Your teeth are only fine 'cause your chocolate is inedible.

    3. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not any worse. In fact, I'd say Arkansas teeth are much worse. In my experience, I'd have to say that Arkansas is the taint of the world.

      The land is simply cursed.

    4. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 4, Funny

      My only question is that it says they've tested these new teeth out. So where did they find a competent dentist in England? Isn't it illegal to bring them into the country?

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    5. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not any worse. In fact, I'd say Arkansas teeth are much worse. In my experience, I'd have to say that Arkansas is the taint of the world.

      The land is simply cursed.

      There's a Clinton joke in there somewhere, but I'm too tired.

    6. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be a bit of a quandry for Bush. Oppose stem-cell research or support the great American Quest for perfectly sized teeth.

      I'm sorry, but I just can't trust a nation where for many people, the most expensive thing they own is their teeth.

    7. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your post reminds me of the riddle:

      You move to a new town and there are only two dentists - one with really good teeth and one with really bad teeth. Which one do you choose to be your dentist?

      Brownie points (and probably Karma too) to whoever gives the explanation along with their answer.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    8. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dentist with the bad teeth. He must obviously be taking care of the dentist with the good teeth.

    9. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'll go to the dentist with the really good teeth.

      He takes care of them in such a way that they don't have to be serviced (often.) And I'd rather have a person that takes care of their teeth taking care of mine.

    10. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, necessity is the mother of invention.

    11. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 3, Funny

      You move to a new town and there are only two dentists - one with really good teeth and one with really bad teeth. Which one do you choose to be your dentist?

      Oh, come on, this is easy. You choose the one with the bad teeth, because the other one is obviously French.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    12. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by DJ+Decay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd go to the dentist with bad teeth, because they were probably looked after by the other dentist. Conversely, the dentist with good teeth was looked after by the "good dentist" with bad teeth.

    13. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I just cant argue with logic like that.

      I will call you an idiot though.

    14. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but can you point me where to get some please?

    15. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'll call you an overweight racist -- an American in other words. Why is it that a nation of fat bastards feel the need to have freaky teeth I'll never know. It's not in the least bit attractive, it's just looks fucking wierd. I mean,Every tooth exactly the same size and shape. You'll be having fucking toe transplants next.

    16. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whichever one is offering treatment on the NHS.

    17. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Actually we all have wonderful teeth here (in the UK)..when we go out we stain and slant them, because we are naturally modest folk who don't wish to instill dental inferiority in others. I hope that's clear?

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    18. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The one who is NOT related to the local lawyer. Simple.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    19. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would knock out my own teeth with a hammer, then hunt down both dentists and liquefy their brains for my consumption.

    20. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd look for a dentist in another town.

      Your riddle was originally intended as a question of barbers, one with terrible hair and one with well-styled hair. It does not translate as well to dentistry, as dental hygene requires personal effort in addition to regular dentist visits. True, hairstyles also require some personal effort, but at least most people don't cut their own hair, so a barber with badly shorn hair would indicate that his barber is a lousy cut.

    21. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I'd go to the one with good teeth, because the one with really bad teeth evidently doesn't even know enough about dental care to take care of his own. (While regular professional dental care is certainly a good idea to maximize the health of your teeth and gums, conscientious self-care will usually prevent "really bad teeth" from developing.)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    22. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      It's a hell of a lot easier to cut your own hair than to give yourself a root canal.

      Actually, my wife cuts here own hair (and mine too) and does a very good job of it.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    23. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer having my new teeth transplanted from executed serial killers, who can then take control of my mouth from beyond the grave to continue their killing sprees. But that's just me.

    24. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd go to whichever one provides nitrous oxide.

    25. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Hrm.

      Maybe the riddle should concern the quality of blowjobs?

    26. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.

      Hmm. I'd like "pretty" and "fast", but my girlfriend just wants "accurate".

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    27. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by blueworld · · Score: 1

      With good hygeine you will never need a root canal. In fact, if you take good care of your teeth and you have a good hygeinist clean them regularly, your dentist should never have to do anything but examine your teeth,

    28. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by carleton · · Score: 1

      Please explain how good hygeine will keep you from getting whacked in the face, which was the cause for all of the root canals of people I know?

    29. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll go to the one with the bigger boobies.

    30. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by blueworld · · Score: 1

      Well, it won't. But the original topic was about dentists with "bad teeth," and I'd expect the poster did not mean that the dentist was getting his teeth knocked out. Your friends are probably relatively young so they are not yet having their teeth fall out due to gum disease.

    31. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by gurensan · · Score: 1

      Albannach? Cait' a bheil sibh, no, co às a tha sibh? Agus, a bheil Gàidhlig agaibh?

      --
      You are all fartheads.
    32. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With good hygiene, people won't want to whack you in the face because of your otherwise foul odour.

    33. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by inkhorn · · Score: 1

      If there are only two dentists, and we assume neither travel out of town to get there teeth seen to, and that neither are able to work on their own teeth.

      I would have to go for the one with bad teeth, as he's obviously done some good work on the other guy.

      The reverse also stands true, unless the guy with bad teeth has a phobia of dentists, as he would surely have had bad treatment from the bad dentist with the good teeth.

      Or did I miss something ?

    34. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by Albanach · · Score: 1

      I'm in Edinburgh and unfortunately don't speak Gaelic, sorry.

    35. Re:Research on Growing Teeth by gurensan · · Score: 1

      Then how'd you know how to respond ? ;)

      No need to answer. Mystery is good.

      --
      You are all fartheads.
  3. Wonderful! by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a solution to the near-catastrophic lack of Rodent Teeth! I can sleep easy tonight!

    --
    "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

    - Seneca
    1. Re:Wonderful! by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      We'll be waking up at night with a sudden urge to chew through the electrical wiring.

    2. Re:Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see some goth kids or vampire the masquerade players going for some fangs...

    3. Re:Wonderful! by Jonathan+the+Nerd · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are not necessarily my own, as I've not yet had my medication today.
    4. Re:Wonderful! by jellybear · · Score: 1

      Yes, but without the paperclip

  4. target market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    alabama and west virginia?

    1. Re:target market? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anywhere there's a Denny's, Cracker Barrel, or a Howard Johnson's

    2. Re:target market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To hell with that. The research was done in London for good reason. British teeth are awful. They need to brush those bastards.

    3. Re:target market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed. and our teeth aren't nearly as bad as they are across the river in kentucky...

  5. New real teeth? No thanks! by datastalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I understand why they're necessary, but come on, why do they have nerves in them? Fingernails and hair are necessary, and evolution seems to have gotten both of those correct... so why do teeth have nerves? And does this growing of new teeth include the nerves? I have had five root canals and stopped counting my cavities at 40 (I'm half English, that's why - the stereo-type is based in reality), so I am looking to get FAKE teeth (the kind that screw into the jaw - I already have one) and be rid of the miserable real ones I have. I sure as hell don't want them replaced with new real ones. That would just be excruciating.

  6. Note to all /. readers... by ClippyHater · · Score: 4, Funny

    Note: This does not mean you can stop brushing your teeth, people! Flossing, okay, maybe, but continue to brush. Please...

    1. Re:Note to all /. readers... by HuckleCom · · Score: 0

      *evil grin* This is awesome; first teeth, then... what? the sky is the limit with stem-cells from what I've read. Just takes time. I'm shocked on this- this is too awesome.

    2. Re:Note to all /. readers... by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Patient: Do I have to floss all my teeth?

      Dentist: No just the ones you want to keep.

      Seriously, even if this works, nothing is 100% and I'm sure they're will be some screw ups, i.e. gum infections, roots not fitting, jaw bone to destroyed to set new teeth, etc.

      Having just had a root canal done recently, I can tell you, take care of your teeth cuz when things go wrong, it hurrrttts!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    3. Re:Note to all /. readers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they could grow me a pair of prehensile penises... OMG that would rock.

    4. Re:Note to all /. readers... by Xaroth · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...continue brushing teeth? You must be new around here.

    5. Re:Note to all /. readers... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      For one of my three fillings, the dentist didn't use anesthesia. DAMN that hurt. And I was only 6 years old.

      They locked the door, too, so my mother couldn't get in to find out what all the screaming was about.

    6. Re:Note to all /. readers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not flossing is just gross, even more gross than not brushing your teeth. Floss for the first time in a week and you'll find so much rancid crap in between your teeth, no matter how much you brushed. I've got one filling in my 21 years and that's in between two of my back molars. Perhaps if I had been more religious about flossing all along I wouldn't have needed it...but believe me now I floss between every tooth twice a day and rinse with antiseptic. Once you've gone through a filling (with a freshman dental student no less) and paid for it out of your own pocket, believe me flossing is not a hassle.

    7. Re:Note to all /. readers... by MicroBerto · · Score: 1

      Ehh... i'd keep flossing, brushing, and using a good mouthwash. Even if this procedure becomes widely used in the 30 years when the average slashdot reader starts having major teeth problems, do you think it will be CHEAP?

      --
      Berto
  7. My eight year old self would be pleased by yndrd · · Score: 4, Funny

    No more brushing my teeth and all the Coke I can drink!

    Take that, Mother, with all your dire predictions about my teeth rotting out.

    1. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by gspr · · Score: 1

      My eighteen year old self IS pleased...

    2. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by beckerie · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's worrying to think that this development might lead to people becoming complacent about their oral hygiene. Just as the pill doesn't prevent people from contracting STD's, the ability to grow teeth through stem cell technology shouldn't send the message to the general public that it's OK to cut corners with personal health.

      Prevention is better than a cure any day.

    3. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's worrying to think that this development might lead to people becoming complacent about their oral hygiene. Just as the pill doesn't prevent people from contracting STD's, the ability to grow teeth through stem cell technology shouldn't send the message to the general public that it's OK to cut corners with personal health.

      Exactly right. Jokes about no longer flossing aside, if you lose your gums to gum disease, it won't matter how many shiny new teeth you can grow. Without gums they'll be worse than useless, they'll be a liability, complete with nerves to exact an excruciating lesson as to why.

      That having been said, its an excellent addition to our medical/dental toolkit, and one I welcome. Stupid people will use it as an excuse to let their hygene go to hell ... the rest of us will continue to excersize good habits, and have even better dental health available to us than beforehand...complete with new teeth when our old ones fail simply as a result of age, get cracked, or otherwise damaged with time and use.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    4. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      And thanks to Lasik, you can sit as close to the TV as you like!

      It seems that modern technology is driven to just say "See, I told you" to the mothers of Generation X.

    5. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because certainly stem cells will never be used to grow gums. Right? I mean, that's absolutely the case isn't it?
      Can you remind me why that is?

    6. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by minektur · · Score: 1
      "... Just as the pill doesn't prevent people from contracting STD's, the ability to grow..."

      I've heard statements like this before, but really, please tell me - what idiot would ever think that the pill - a PREGNANCY preventing device would do anything for STD's? Do you know anyone that stupid? I don't.

    7. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What kind of person has to be told more than once than fucking without protection leads to pregnancy?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:My eight year old self would be pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may one day be able to grow new gums for you, but it's foolish to plan accordingly. You remind me of smokers who say, "By the time I get lung cancer, they'll have found a cure." What if they don't?

  8. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandatory SCO joke:

    Maybe they can use it to grow some teeth for their slowly withering lawsuits!

  9. After this is able to be applied to humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until goths get real fangs?

    1. Re:After this is able to be applied to humans by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How long until goths get real fangs?
      Actually, this AC has brought up an interesting point: what will this do for cosmetic dentistry.

      If people will pay hundreds of dollars to have a good tattoo sleeve on their arm, or go through the pain and effort to expand their earlobes/nipples/whatever with gauge-zero spacers, why not custom teeth? The fact that they're actual living teeth, grown from your own stem cells, would just add value to the investment.

      Also, I'm sure that if this becomes viable, the urge to improve on nature will be impossible to resist (through GM or some mechanical means as the tooth grows in a lab somewhere). How about a new set of "metric teeth" or a set with an engineered, non-stick coating?
    2. Re:After this is able to be applied to humans by me.at.work · · Score: 1

      Soon I hope.
      No, I'm no goth but ever after reading Gibson's Johnny Mnemonic (or Neuromancer, can't remember which) I've been a total sucker for the idea of having real fangs instead of these crappy cornerteeth we have.
      Yay! Can't wait to go lotek on a good steak and be done with the old fork and knife! Instant gratification!
      (I'm not kidding, I would get real fangs if they became available.)

    3. Re:After this is able to be applied to humans by XO · · Score: 1

      You can have your teeth filed down sharp fangs, if you would like. This is the path many lifelong Gothic people have gone, to appear more Goth...

      (anyone who's ever been to City Club, downtown Detroit, has definitely seen this in action)

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  10. Smashing, baby by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is wonderful news, now I can grow teeth like Tom Cruise's.

    Oh wait, this research was done in the UK.

    Make that Austin Powers.

    John.

    1. Re:Smashing, baby by Milkyman · · Score: 1

      this is modded funny but Tom Cruise's teeth were pretty messed up until recently. I remember when he was promoting Minority Report, he went on Leno and had braces on.

    2. Re:Smashing, baby by kfg · · Score: 1

      Funny, yes, but one of the first things that occured to me is that there's going to be quite a market for "celebrity" teeth.

      Nevermind that what you see in the pictures is tens of thousands of dollars and years worth of man made artificiality in a lot of cases.

      KFG

    3. Re:Smashing, baby by jafac · · Score: 1

      Well, jeez, the research was done in the UK because of the Christian Taliban here in the US banned it.

      Next time, think before you vote. All of you.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Smashing, baby by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. These are adult stem cells. Not banned in the US.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
  11. Niven by 100lbHand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks like some one has been reading A Gift From Earth.
    Old men with baby teeth, that just freaks me out.
    It would be the Brits to start doing this though.

    --
    "I'm not high, just stupid" --JY
    1. Re:Niven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old men with baby teeth, that just freaks me out.

      I don't get it, how can you read science-fiction without having an open mind, or at least not developing one? There is nothing freaky about that, you just need to have an open mind and admit that just because something isn't possible here and now, it doesn't mean it's unnatural or unacceptable.

  12. Yesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Awwright!! Now I can finally regain my old vigour and shtamina! No more shtupid den-turesh for me. Shpeaking with thish interminable lishp is killing me.

    Shinsherely,
    Cohen the Barbarian
    Reshipient of Oldesht Living Barbarian Award

    1. Re:Yesh! by OrthodonticJake · · Score: 0

      --"Eh, wuzzat?" "TEETH, HAMISH." --"Theives?!?!!" "TEETH." --"KILL THE BUGGERIN' THEIVES!" It's time for his dried frog pills.

      --
      I regularly report MSN spam to the Hotmail admins.
    2. Re:Yesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a wisp you inshentititive cwod!

  13. Hack the tooth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would be cool if in the future you could have some plasmid novelty joke gum that would alter the stem cell DNA and turn the tooth into a penis or ass. You've been Punk'd, ass mouth!

    1. Re:Hack the tooth! by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      This would do wonders for the pr0n industry... It's a bird, it's a plane...it's .... penis and ass man!

    2. Re:Hack the tooth! by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      If the tooth was turned into a penis... it'd give a new meaning to "face fucking", don't you think?

      Or if it was an ass, when you throw up... well, you'll really gross some people out. :-(

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
  14. of all the things by millahtime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of all the things to grow are teeth. Why not something like hair. That's where the money is. Look at all the infomercials.

    1. Re:of all the things by Hatta · · Score: 0, Funny

      of all the things to grow are teeth. Why not something like hair. That's where the money is. Look at all the infomercials.

      Or penises.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:of all the things by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
      Why not something like hair.
      Judging by the spam I get, there's other (...cough cough, ahem) body parts, usually associated with the male of the species, which are popular with the enhancement sales crowd. Not that it's necessary in my case, of course. My hand ^H^H^H^H girlfriend hasn't complained yet....
      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    3. Re:of all the things by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      but... I don't want another penis.
      The one I have gets me into enough trouble as it is.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    4. Re:of all the things by Snart+Barfunz · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to grow hair in your mouth? I know this is Slashdot but that's taking geekdom too far. Let's keep beards on the outside of the face, where they belong.

      --
      --- Yx3 = Delilah ---
  15. I can see it now by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now it won't only be the cute kids singing:
    "All I want for Christmas is my two front teeth.."

    --
    Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    1. Re:I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more wearing braces for years! Just rip 'em all out and get some new ones!

    2. Re:I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just rip 'em out period. Fuck yeah.
      i can't see too well, what's it all about? well I dunno man. . .

  16. why not just.... by iwein · · Score: 1

    BRUSH YOUR TEETH (song by KOMPRESSOR)

    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:why not just.... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      lack of dental hygiene is not the reason why professional hockey players (among others) lose their teeth.

  17. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Major_Small · · Score: 3, Informative
    do you want your teeth growing longer and longer? would you want to have to trim your teeth along with your hair and nails?

    teeth aren't made of the same stuff as hair and nails. teeth are bones, and all bones have blood vessels and nerves in them... unless you want flexible teeth of course...

  18. Keep it up, Europe by Patik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad Bush won't allow the U.S. to fund this fantastic, useful research because it clashes with his religious ideals. I can only hope that universities and companies within Europe keep moving forward.

    1. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bush never banned stem cells. He simply limited the ways they could be gotten. And then somebody figured out how to derive them and made the entire arguement null and void, so life in the US Stem Cell research industry went on, life as normal.

    2. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Too bad Bush won't allow the U.S. to fund this fantastic, useful research because it clashes with his religious ideals

      Step back, oh, sixty-seventy years.

      "Too bad the UK won't allow this stunning new Eugenics research, because it clashes with their religious ideals. I mean, it's not like they're PEOPLE or anything."

      Stopping research because of religiously-based morals has a long and time-honored tradition, that didn't start with Bush and won't go away when he leaves office.

      That said, Bush is just fine with companies doing research with "morally obtained" stem cells. I don't recall what the criteria is, but I do believe that "not from abortion" is a big one, and that about twenty (out of 100 or so) of the extant stem-cell lines qualify.

    3. Re:Keep it up, Europe by skaffen42 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah. Imagine in 20 years it will be the Brits making fun of American's teeth!

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    4. Re:Keep it up, Europe by drsmack1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The USA is a representative democracy - fetal stem cell research is opposed by the majority of the population. Bush is not pushing an unpopular policy on the people. Different people have different ideas on what constitutes "moving forward". To them your "moving forward" on this line of scientific research is "moving backwards" on the rights of the unborn and the value of human life. Some of this is being pushed by companies that profit from abortion. There is a LOT of money there. Also a lot of the same people (not saying you are one of them) who fight against animal testing are in your camp. I find this disturbing.

    5. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Patik · · Score: 3, Insightful
      fetal stem cell research is opposed by the majority of the population.
      How do you know?
      To them your "moving forward" on this line of scientific research is "moving backwards" on the rights of the unborn and the value of human life.
      But I'm sure a lot of them will gladly receive new operations/medicines/treatments that were made possible by stem cell research.
    6. Re:Keep it up, Europe by goon+america · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny how another article in the NYT says "The US is losing dominance in the sciences". Keep it up, Bush team! Soon we'll be living in that conservative, backwards anti-scientific paradise in no time!

    7. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Bush won't allow the U.S. to fund this fantastic,

      useful research because it clashes with his religious

      ideals.

      This might have been a relevant point if these researchers were using embryonic stem cells. But they're not. This project would have been totally eligible for government funding in the US.

      But from the tone of your post, it looks like you care more about scoring cheap political points, and you probably don't really give a sh*t about this one way or the other.

    8. Re:Keep it up, Europe by drsmack1 · · Score: 0

      >>How do you know? http://tinyurl.com/2gxt6 Here is the poll question: "Stem cells are the basic cells from which all of a person's tissues and organs develop. Congress is considering whether to provide federal funding for experiments using stem cells from human embryos. The live embryos would be destroyed in their first week of development to obtain these cells. Do you support or oppose using your federal tax dollars for such experiments?" The results were: Support - 24%, Opposed - 70%, Don't Know and Refused - 6%. Further, only 18% supported "all stem cell research" while 67% supported "only adult stem cell research." >But I'm sure a lot of them will gladly receive >new operations/medicines/treatments that were >made possible by stem cell research. For some people - you are right. This is a character issue.

    9. Re:Keep it up, Europe by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      fetal stem cell research is opposed by the majority of the population.

      Correction. It is supported by the vocal population. I bet 90 % of the people in this country could care less. They are too worried trying to find jobs and keep paying the rent.

    10. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Patik · · Score: 2, Informative
      That link is from Christianity.com -- a little biased, perhaps?

      I'm not saying most people are in favor of embryonic stem cell research, I just haven't seen any public polls on it to show me otherwise.

    11. Re:Keep it up, Europe by TGK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know where you're coming from, but the way Bush went about this was one of the most offensive things about his administration.

      Bush banned research on stem cells harvested from abortions. Abortions are going to happen reguardless, harvesting stem cells at least allows the death of the unborn child (if you buy into that) to serve to save lives and better humanity.

      If Bush wanted to prevent abortions from happening to get stem cells he should have put in place laws restricting the availability of stem cells to the family of the aborted fetus. Further steps should have been put in place to prevent the sale of stem cells harvested from an aborted fetus.

      Nonetheless, when all is said and done all Bush's regulations have accomplished is the crippling of scientific persuit. Bush hasn't stopped a single abortion through this shift, he has simply denied the American medical community the resources they need to cure the sick.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    12. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stopping research because of religiously-based morals has a long and time-honored tradition

      So you justify the present-day actions by what has happened in the past? "Look, 1000 years ago people believed Earth was the center of the universe, so I'm not dumb in believing so as well." "Look, 1000 years ago, countries fought each other all the time, so there is nothing wrong with invading other countries now." "Look, 200 years ago women couldn't vote, so why should they now?"

      No wonder the US is going backwards (not that I mind at all, not being American). This is the same type of argument that people put forward when defending US against their citizens' dwindling freedom: we're still better than Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, so we're OK. Whee!

    13. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Eccles · · Score: 1

      The first link google shows says the public is in favor of the research by 58% to 30%, with 10% undecided.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    14. Re:Keep it up, Europe by mrdogi · · Score: 1
      But I'm sure a lot of them will gladly receive new operations/medicines/treatments that were made possible by stem cell research.

      Personally, I would not if the were from fetuses. If, however, they are using my onw stem cells, as somebody else posted, I would have no problems what-so-ever.

      Kind of along those lines, I've heard that adult's stem cells are far less likely to cause complications that fetus stem cells, especially in adults. Sorry, no info to back that up.

    15. Re:Keep it up, Europe by HBPiper · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fetal stem cell research is almost irrelevant. The Australians have extracted stem cells from baby teeth. It gives new meaning to why the tooth fairy leaves money. Then there is the process for extracting stem cells from body fat. Stem cell research does not need to be used as a reason for killing off unwanted pregnancies. Fetus's are not the only source of stem cells, they are just one of the first sources discovered.

      --
      "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
    16. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bush limited fetal stem cell lines eligible for US federally funded research to those available at the time the decision was made. Since then, most of those lines have been found to be so contaminated as to be useless. US researchers were and are crippled by this decision. If you claim that someone has found a way to create clean, pluripotent stem cell lines that do everything new fetal stem cells can do, please provide a citation -- I follow this issue closely and haven't heard about it.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    17. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Jmstuckman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Too bad Bush won't allow the U.S. to fund this fantastic, useful research because it clashes with his religious ideals.


      No, this procedure is performed using adult stem cells. Bush is only opposed to the use of embryonic stem cells in research.


      Was the parent post serious, or have I been trolled?

    18. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That particular poll is obviously biased. Any question with the words "embryos would be destroyed" will not be well supported.

    19. Re:Keep it up, Europe by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Great Leaping Mel Gibson, what's going on here?
      The term "stem cell" covers a freakin' vast range of cell types. It's not A thing. It's a huge category of thingS. And the most promising ones were the ones that Bush did inded ban and it is costing the US every day the ban is in place.

    20. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the ideal is proposed on the basis of relgious reasoning, doesn't make it wrong.

      A human (embryo), which otherwise would mature into human baby if not removed from a woman's womb or conceived in laboratory, would be destroyed for the
      sake of a new tooth.

      This seems to me to go against the idea of human rights. Making it an issue for a democratic soceity (republic) to resolve by popular vote isn't right either (democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for lunch).

      Thanks to God that Truth is protected by religion.

    21. Re:Keep it up, Europe by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Bush banned research on stem cells harvested from abortions.

      Although I seem to remember they were coming from the leftover embryos created at fertility clinics. One might argue these are technically "abortions" too, but fertility clinics don't draw the same sort of political fire. If more babies come out of a process then it's OK.

    22. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the NYT article, you'll see that the US started to lose dominance right around 1993.

      I'm not blaming Clinton for this, but I am blaming the congressional Democrats who killed the superconducting supercollider.

    23. Re:Keep it up, Europe by pjkundert · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So, let me get this straight...

      The parent post states something so preposterously stupid that it is almost inconcievable that someone would say it -- and gets a "+5, Insightful".

      Then, I joke about his mistaken assumptions, and get a "-1, Flamebait"?

      --
      -- -pjk Perry Kundert perry@kundert.ca http://kundert.2y.net
    24. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, too bad Bush said we couldn't mutilate children that are too defenseless to help themselves! I guess he only thinks about money!

    25. Re:Keep it up, Europe by CptNerd · · Score: 1



      I'd rather they used my own stem cells instead of stem cells from some other source, so that there would be no rejection. Tissue rejection is an ugly thing, and I don't want to be on immunosuppressive drugs just to have new teeth.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    26. Re:Keep it up, Europe by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      So you object to recycling then?

      90% (or more) of the recyclable material I generate is related to my booze consumption.

      Booze, beer, and all the stuff that goes with it is morally objectionable to some people and some whole religions.

      Therefore, to pacify those irrational beliefs I should throw my cans and bottles in a landfill rather than having them re-used. A valuable resource forgone, and a burden on landfills produced.

      Sound stupid? It is. But that's exactly what your arguement is.

      While abortions are certainly a really bad solution to a problem, they do need to happen at this point and they are still legal.

      Assuming that, the tissue produced can be either wasted or used to actually help people. To me it's a no brainer.

      Only a stupid facist pseudo-christian asshole would imply that abortions happen just to produce stem cells for research. It seems to me that's exactly what you did.

    27. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that sucks.

    28. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, stem cells are more then just from a euthanized fetus. In fact most, if not all, pratical applications of stem cells have come from placenta blood stem cells and adult stem cells.

    29. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what wording would be? The embryos are destroyed to obtain their stem cells, aren't they? So what newspeak would you use to describe that process that would fool all the people who oppose the destruction of embryos into going along with it? Furthermore, why do you think it's necessary to do so if there's nothing inherently wrong with destroying the embryos?

      (I agree the poll's results are skewed, but that's not because of the wording so much as the viewership of that site).

    30. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the right thing to do would be to study (possibly in higher mammals) how the pluriportant cells change into the multipotent stems cells and try to reverse that action and have the multipotents revert back to the pluripotent cells and have a endless supply of them ... hmmm I wonder if I can just patent that idea and sue the company that actually comes up with it ... seems to still be a popular business model in tech, it might work in bio-tech too

    31. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm sure a lot of them will gladly receive new operations/medicines/treatments that were made possible by stem cell research

      Sorry to blow a whole in your argument, but many people hold to their ethics and value and respect for life consistently. For example, people refuse certain vaccines because they were intially cultured in tissue from an aborted child.

      Also, you are making a *big* assumption that worthwhile treatments/operations/etc will result from these inhumane methods. For a historical perspective, I recall there is some debate over whether the grotesque "medical experiments" the Nazi's performed have provided the world with important medical information. Even if one believes the information learned to be valuable, I doubt many (if any) would suggest continuing the Nazi's practices. Another example, a great deal was learned about social psychology in the early part of last century... but laws and guidelines have been introduced to require more humane treatments of people in experiments even though there is proof that valuable information could be gained (e.g. one study ended up in people leaping out of second story windows-- lots of science advancement but for some reason people decided it wasn't a good thing morally to structure a test that produced such results).

    32. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In fact most, if not all, pratical applications of stem cells have come from placenta blood stem cells and adult stem cells."
      Well, there ya go. As seen on Slashdot --it's a fact according to ? ? ? I guess that settles it then.
      Interesting, this is the same kind of hard cutting fact finding that has demonstrated the existence of the almighty free market fairy.
      No, really, it was in a survey at the National Review.

    33. Re:Keep it up, Europe by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      If more babies come out of a process then it's OK.

      Yup. More babies is okay. Killing babies is not.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    34. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an interesting read. Seems to me (and I'm not a Bush supporter) that Bush's refusal to allow fetal stem cell research has caused the medical community to find alternative methods for retrieving stem cells sooner than they might have otherwise.

    35. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that, the tissue produced can be either wasted or used to actually help people. To me it's a no brainer.

      According to your logic, it would also be reasonable to render leftover fetal tissue to make cat food.

    36. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Fetal stem cell research is almost irrelevant. The Australians have extracted stem cells from [other tissues in post-birth people] Fetus's are not the only source of stem cells, they are just one of the first sources discovered.

      There are lots of different stem cell lines at different stages of the organism's development. Stem cells extracted later in life may have partially differentiated and thus have less plasticity than those extracted early. They'll also be closer to the Hayflick Limt, with shorter telomeres, limiting the amount of tissue they can produce and accellerating its aging, and be more likely to have accumulated genetic damage, making them more likely to become cancerous.

      Stem cells extracted from the already-born are almost certain to be useful for most tissue-replacement purposes, once the science has been done to understand the mechanisms. But to do that science with ONLY the information from the differentiated cell lines, blinding the researchers to the more pristine early-stage genome, is enormously more difficult.

      And that's the stage we're at now.

      By blocking foetal stem cell research the US policymakers are delaying the availability of new treatments. This increases human suffering and death - with no reduction in the number of aborted foetuses, or any other mitigation of harm, to show for it.

      Doing the basic research on foetal tissue from abortions performed for other purposes is still somewhat more difficult than doing it on foetuses created for the purpose. But not a lot more so. And such a ban WOULD prevent the creation of foetuses just to be killed for research.

      Once the basic research is done, treatments can be designed to use stem cell lines harvested post-birth (preferably from the individual being treated, which solves rejection problems as well). A ban on using foetal cells for TREATMENTS can prevent the foetus-farm scenario at a relatively minor cost in human suffering and death from untreated conditions.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    37. Re:Keep it up, Europe by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Six hundred years ago, it was forbidden to perform autopsies to study anatomy.

      Why is this more apt than eugenics? Because the subject of study is already dead. Any objection with abortion is as moot as any objection with death -- it has happened, now let it benefit the living.

      You're right, though, that this neither begins nor ends Bush.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  19. no mice yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    submission says: According to the BBC, the research has already been successfully performed on mice, and clinical trials on humans should begin within two years.

    However the story says: The company Odontis, set up by the college, hopes to develop its research for tests on humans within two years after successful research on mice.

    It doesn't sound like they've actually grown MiceTeeth(tm) yet, unless I'm reading that terribly wrong.

    1. Re:no mice yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MiceTeeth

      Stop naming EVERY FUCKING THING like it was a FUCKING CLASS IN AN OO LANGUAGE! Fucking marketing morons! All the fucking lot of you!

      *Deep breath* Thanks, I feel better now.

    2. Re:no mice yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This looks like the exact same press release, only updated, from August 2002. Looks like now they have money, where as before, they didn't.

      But maybe that's just the skeptic in me. The other part of me, the one that has rotten teeth, really hopes this grant money makes growing teeth possible.

    3. Re:no mice yet? by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative
      The BBC article is awful but someone here linked to this Guardian article that's much better. The company seems to be much further along than their website or Sharpe's publications (minimal) would suggest.

      It also answers the first question that came to my mind -- how does a molar or incisor get specified? Apparently, the different teeth form in the same dish and are then identified and sorted before transplantation. And the stem cells come from the patient, not from fetuses, BTW.

  20. This could be frightning by drsmack1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I imagine that using this technique that they could grow a tooth anywhere, right? I got a joke in e-mail last week about vagina's with teeth - I could only get to sleep that night by dismissing it as an impossibility. Now what? I'm suffering some serious shrinkage here - tell me it isn't so... Snapping - be careful what you wish for.

    1. Re:This could be frightning by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      Hmm this would converge sex and oral sex together. No wonder the project got funded. This would prevent older women from having to buy vaginal dentures.

    2. Re:This could be frightning by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I got a joke in e-mail last week about vagina's with teeth - I could only get to sleep that night by dismissing it as an impossibility.
      Don't they call them mouths?

  21. What kind of stem cells... by nebaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't seem to say whether or not these teeth can be grown without fetal stem cells. Expect protest if so.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:What kind of stem cells... by Gropo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article I read said the stem cells were taken from the patient... I doubt that they're planning on replacing teeth in unborn foetuses.

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    2. Re:What kind of stem cells... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Speaking of eating Irish babys....

  22. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by stecoop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since you have root canales than you know that the tooth "dies" when you remove the blood vessels. The tooth is a healthy living organ requiring nutrients. You can remove this but than the tooth starts turning black from the lack of nutrients (any real dentist please step in and fill the voids of knowledge). The nerves are there to let you know when something is wrong. Yeah I wish my legs didn't have nerves when I brook it but I need to know that something was wrong.

  23. Ready to shed my coffee stained teeth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give my teeth new balls of stems..
    i mean stem cells in balls...
    ooops... balls of stem cells.

  24. Who needs a grant? Go toothfairy! by elleomea · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do they need a grant for, can't they just stick all the teeth they grow under their pillows?

    1. Re:Who needs a grant? Go toothfairy! by simcop2387 · · Score: 0

      yea but at a quarter a tooth who has a pillow that big?

    2. Re:Who needs a grant? Go toothfairy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do they need a grant for, can't they just stick all the teeth they grow under their pillows?

      That creates the same conundrum that nuclear fusion research has run into. It's a simple matter of economics; the cost to produce one tooth is likely higher than the current market price of lost teeth. Just as fusion will become mind bogglingly profitable when they (the researchers) are actually able to get more energy out than they put in, I'm sure that the lost tooth market will become saturated by cheap, high quality teeth as soon as they can be produced for less than the dollar they are worth now.

  25. All I want for christmas..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is my (geneticly engeneered,grown from stem cells, expensive as hell I'm sure) two front teeth :)

  26. New Product Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Crest Toothening Strips. More teeth in 2 weeks, guaranteed!

  27. Fish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there something about fish growing teeth on /. a while ago?

  28. how is this possible with stem cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, how is this possible with stem cells ..

    I mean after all ..babies have no teeth.

    Mod -1 troll, -1 flamebait.
    Just a joke, move along.

  29. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Ouroboro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is my understanding that most of the differences in tooth health around the world are due to environmental variance. I grew up in a place where there was a lot of fluoride in the water, and the schools also had programs to provide additional fluoride. This has given me very hard tooth enamel. In the 30+ years of my life, I've only ever had one cavity filled. One would presume that they would grow the teeth in an environment that fosters teeth that are healthy.

    --
    When I want your opinion I will beat it out of you.
  30. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Correction: teeth are made of enamel, not bone. Enamel is much harder than bone (and in fact living bone tissue is rather flexible IIRC). Teeth have to made of harder stuff than bone in order to grind up some of the different types of foods that omnivores like humans eat.

  31. This is going to be huge by Richthofen80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not the teeth part, but the technology itself.

    but the teeth market won't be the market that fuels this research. No, the market is the hair loss market. the same stem cell technology is being used to replace teeth can replace hair follicles.

    in traditional hair restoration, hair is transplanted from point A on the bottom of the scalp, where the follicles for some reason don't fall out like they do on the crown. this works, but the hair has to be spread thin, because there's only X amount you can take, and it means there's going to be missing hair from the bottom.

    what the cloned hair would do is allow an arbitrary thickness and density of placement, not limited by the donors thickness and supply at the base, since you can take a small amount from the base, clone them to the amount you want, and make a better graft.

    i can't wait, being 24 and nearly bald. fight genetics with science.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:This is going to be huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you worried of being bald ? Don't you like your futuristic look ?

    2. Re:This is going to be huge by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the same stem cell technology is being used to replace teeth can replace hair follicles.

      Not necessarily. According to the Guardian piece the stem cells are taken from the patient themselves, but it doesn't say where the stem cells originate. I'm certainly not an expert in the field, but there was a really good episode of the PBS show Innovations on stem cell research recently. It talked about spinal cord repair using nerve stem cells from the nose (yes, you have nerve stem cells in your nose. No, I had no idea either.) and heart muscle repair (post heart attack) using bone marrow stem cells.

      Anyway, the deal is that not all stem cells are the same. There are differentiated ones and undifferentiated ones. The differentiated ones cannot be used to grow "any" other kind of cell -- at least, not that we've figured out yet. They have already specialized toward a kind of cell (for instance, nerve cells) and cannot grow other kinds of cells (like blood cells or muscle cells). AFAIK, most of the stem cells we still have after birth are these kind.

      The undifferentiated stem cells are pretty much the holy grail. They can (in theory) be coaxed toward creating any kind of cell you want -- blood, muscle, nerve, tooth, hair, etc. Of course, there's the issue of getting them. I think some of the stem cells in the bone marrow are undifferentiated. I'm not aware of any others elsewhere in the body. But, heck, we weren't even aware of stem cells a few decades ago and I'm certainly not a medical researcher, so I could be dead wrong here.

      All of that said -- whether or not this could be used for your balding head basically comes down to two things -- 1) are they using undifferentiated cells, 2) can we figure out and replicate the process that causes such stem cells to produce hair cells.

      And I very much disagree that the hair replacement market will be a primary funding source -- it's going to be too expensive for some time to come. Surgery, even outpatient surgery, is usually not part of hair replacement, and there's no way to get to stem cells without at least some surgery.

      I suspect most of it will come from cardiovascular and cancer research. Stem cell research is already looking extremely positive for heart attack treatment. So far every study done has given back 100% positive results. That's unheard of. And the treatment is relatively cheap to boot.

      The cancer research comes in an opposite direction. Do you know what leukemia is? Essentially the stem cells in your bone marrow going haywire. We know that stem cells can regenerate other cells, but we really don't understand how, or why they occasionally malfunction. Which is a danger with using stem cell treatments, at least in theory. But if we can figure out how stem cells actually work then we can make some major steps toward fighting cancer.

      Oh, and finally, none of this research is being done with fetal stem cells. It's all being done with the stem cells from the patient themselves. Which is a huge plus as far as rejection goes -- there simply won't be any. The only real advantage of fetal stem cell research is that there's a ton of undifferentiated stem cells in an embryo.

    3. Re:This is going to be huge by LiSrt · · Score: 1
      there's going to be missing hair from the bottom

      wtf?!, it's too short down there.

      ahh, from the bottom of the scalp...

    4. Re:This is going to be huge by Jay+Bratcher · · Score: 1

      Actually, judging from the emails I get, the pen1s enlargement industry stands to make billions. When that happens, then we will be talking about something that is going to be huge!

    5. Re:This is going to be huge by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      two things, you're wrong about 'too expensive'... hair replacement surgery is cosmetic, and not limited by stupid insurance rules. simply put, there's a huge motivation for men and women to look good.

      "In general, most of our patients invest anywhere between four thousand to twelve thousand dollars more or less per procedure"

      From google answers: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=31 8929

      Total national expenditure for hair transplants was $51,306,382 in 2003.

      now, considering that the number would increase based on the fact that drugs like propecia and rogaine are merely symptom treaters, and don't work so well, we could see that number go up. I'd say its a booming industry.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  32. Heh. by BJH · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing an article on this identical process, about three years ago, that said the new treatment would be available to the public in about three years.

    I guess in two years time I can look forward to it being only a year away.

    1. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will that be any better?

      Take yourself forward those 2 years...

      "I guess in one years time I can look forward to it being only 6 months away"

      Go ahead that six months

      "I guess in 6 months time I can look forward to it being only 3 months away"

      Go ahead that 3 months

      "I guess in 3 months time I can look forward to it being only 1.5 months away"

      Go ahead that 1.5 months

      "I guess in 1.5 months time I can look forward to it being only 0.75 months away"

      Go ahead that 22.83 days

      "I guess in 22.83 days time I can look forward to it being only 11.41 days away"

      Go ahead that 11.41 days

      "I guess in 11.41 days time I can look forward to it being only 5.71 days away"

      Go ahead that 5.71 days

      "I guess in 5.71 days time I can look forward to it being only 2.85 days away"

      Go ahead that 2.85 days

      "I guess in 2.85 days time I can look forward to it being only 1.43 days away"

      Go ahead that 1.43 days

      "I guess in 1.43 days time I can look forward to it being only 17.12 hours away"

      Go ahead that 17.12 hours

      "I guess in 17.12 hours time I can look forward to it being only 8.56 hours away"

      You get the point.. it will never happen!!!!

    2. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard they arent releasing it until HalfLife2 comes out...

  33. Mice with teeth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mice and rats don't have teeth. They have incisors which are teeth like but they continously grow. Imagine fingernail like teeth that wear down but since they always grow, they should always have teeth.

  34. Customers by miike · · Score: 3, Funny

    After watching the icehockey world championship this week I am sure there's a demand for them.

  35. Super Mice? by jetkust · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to the BBC, the research has already been successfully performed on mice, and clinical trials on humans should begin within two years.

    With all these advancements we keep performing on mice (mice with human breasts and gigantic ears. Mice that can control things with their mind and are cancer proof...Mice that produce sperm for monkeys,mice that glow in the dark, etc...), it's only a matter of time before we build a renegade breed of super-supergenius mice who become our leaders and take over the world.

    1. Re:Super Mice? by bhima · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      I'm really, really sorry but it has to said:

      I, for one, can't wait for our new super-supergenius mice overlords.

      OK I feel dirty and shamed, I have to go shower.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Super Mice? by simcop2387 · · Score: 0

      i for one welcome our genetically superior Acomys Cahirinus overlords.

    3. Re:Super Mice? by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 1

      Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

      --
      I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
    4. Re:Super Mice? by tburkhol · · Score: 2, Funny
      With all these advancements we keep performing on mice, it's only a matter of time before we build a renegade breed of super-supergenius mice who become our leaders and take over the world.

      I'm afraid you've missed the point. With the earth itself being little more than a computer designed by the mice in the first place, it's really only appropriate that we offer the benefits first to our lab-mouse overlords.

    5. Re:Super Mice? by lazn · · Score: 1

      They're Pinky, They're Pinky and the Brain Brain Brain Brain.

      ==>Lazn

    6. Re:Super Mice? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new supergenius mice overlords.

      They've got to be better than the idiots that lead us today.

    7. Re:Super Mice? by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Given that the mice already had Earth build to their specifications, it seems logical that they would use the galaxy's most powerful computer to enhance themselves...

    8. Re:Super Mice? by SlayerofGods · · Score: 0

      Anyone else remember the movie The Secret of NIMH from their childhood?

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  36. This will never become legal in the US... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's just like marijuana legalization. The people missing the most teeth tend not to vote.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:This will never become legal in the US... by nebaz · · Score: 1

      I would tend to disagree. I think the people missing the most teeth are old people, and they do tend to vote.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  37. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly, I have a friend with full dentures who says she's never been happier in her life. No more pain or discomfort, and when they need work she simply sends them out.

    I'd consider this step just the first phase though. What they need to figure out is how to inject a current root with cells that turn a tooth into a "baby" tooth that loosens and falls out on its own, and then is replaced. Sort of like the "Shark Model," only different.

    KFG

  38. So the question here is by mcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do the stem cells know when to *stop* growing the tooth? I mean, clearly there's something telling them when they're done but what happens if something goes wrong? What happens if you drop these things in someone's gum, and it starts growing a tooth, but the shutoff mechanism for the stem cells never activates.. so it just keeps growing.. and growing.. and growing...

    LONDON, ENGLAND... A HUGE, WHITE MASS LOOMS OVER THE BUILDINGS ON THE HORIZON

    WOMAN, FRIGHTENED AND DRAWING BACK: My God... what is it??

    MAN, STANDING BACK DRAMATICALLY: It is... The Tooth.

    1. Re:So the question here is by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      How do the stem cells know when to *stop* growing the tooth?

      Via the excact same mechanism they do in every human being already, maybe?

      Oh, and human tissue that grows out of control doesn't become huge and monstrous. It becomes cancer, and kills its own flesh & blood.

    2. Re:So the question here is by mcc · · Score: 1

      Oh, and human tissue that grows out of control doesn't become huge and monstrous. It becomes cancer, and kills its own flesh & blood.

      Well, that certainly makes for boring science fiction, doesn't it?

    3. Re:So the question here is by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Funny
      well, good pulp scifi never cares about regulations or the laws of physics? Movies would be kinda boring if they consisted of

      Mad Scientist: At last, my army of catgirls nears completion, soon the world will be mine

      Random Minion: Uh, boss, you're in violation of the cloning ban.

      Mad Scientist: Are you sure.

      Minion: Yeah

      Mad Scientist: Darn. There goes that plan. Get out the shredder.

      [Fade to Black]

      Though I guess this exercise does prove one thing. Reality mostly sucks.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:So the question here is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thought I had was, how does it know what kind of tooth to grow into? I mean, it'd be pretty hilarious if people were walking around with molars in the front of their mouth.

  39. Re:Still no cure for cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck root canal!

    Would you prefer administrator canal?

    Microsoft just trying to prove how painful the root account is.

  40. Oh no, terrible! This will destroy IT! by BerntB · · Score: 1
    Why not something like hair. That's where the money is. Look at all the infomercials.
    Oh, no...

    Consider the disaster for one of the few growth industries in IT!

    What shams will the spam industry sell if we can start growing things medically?!

    Quit the statistics courses, guys... there is no future in getting around the Bayesian analysis, anymore... :-(

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:Oh no, terrible! This will destroy IT! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent point. The solution to spam is to invent shit like that which really works, and put the spammers out of business. When you can go to the doctor and get new hair growing, get your pecker or your tits enlarged without plastic surgery, and so on, there will be little to no reason to send out advertisements via email any more.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Oh no, terrible! This will destroy IT! by BerntB · · Score: 1
      This is an excellent point. The solution to spam is to invent shit like that which really works, and put the spammers out of business.
      No, it was NOT an excellent point!

      Human greed and stupidity are probably infinite. The spammers will find something new to sell to the idiots.

      I just made two terrible jokes about spam being a serious and growing career option (if it really is -- don't tell me, I'm misantrophic enough as is) and about making stuff grow that I get my spam about...

      There was no deeper insights in my post!

      That is truly an insulting insinuation. My latest moral outrage was at the sensitive end of the "Passion" -- in South Park. It made me sick.

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    3. Re:Oh no, terrible! This will destroy IT! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Oh no, terrible! This will destroy IT! by BerntB · · Score: 1
      He, he -- Google allows everyone to make a good comeback with a reference. :-)

      As a comeback, I'll comment on that there are theories in psychology and evolutionary psychology that we humans aren't built to be happy.

      When we at long last get what we wanted so bad it hurt, then we soon begin to feel unfulfilled -- and start to work towards the next target...

      This is obviously good motivation to get us working hard. (Insight regarding this is not rewarded evolutionary, either...)

      So, based on this, the spammers and con men of the world will always have someone to fool.

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  41. Wonderful! by spidergoat2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I now have the opportunity to wear braces again. Another step forward for science AND fashion!

  42. Connecting the Nerves by karmatic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While the growing of teeth is certainly an interesting and useful application of this technology, I personally would like to see how they handle connecting the nerves in the new teeth to the roots in the host.

    Depending on how it's handled, it could possibly be applied to a number of other useful medical advances, such as helping repair nerve damage, prosthetic limbs, and spinal cord injuries.

    Aren't stem cells wonderful things?

    1. Re:Connecting the Nerves by baadfood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like all biological processes that will (should) be automatic. The simple fact that there is a tooth forming will encourage the growth of blood and nerve endings. Think about this. Before you get your teeth for the first time the plumbing is not yet wired in. Its only as the teeth start to grow that blood and nerves get wired up.

    2. Re:Connecting the Nerves by idiot900 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While the growing of teeth is certainly an interesting and useful application of this technology, I personally would like to see how they handle connecting the nerves in the new teeth to the roots in the host.

      I'm by no means an expert in the field, but I'd suspect the newly implanted tooth would be made to secrete nerve growth factors that would cause the appropriate nerves in the gums to grow and attach themselves to the tooth.

    3. Re:Connecting the Nerves by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Why are nerves necessary in teeth? People have root canals, which destroy the nerve tissue, all the time.

    4. Re:Connecting the Nerves by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      One of the articles points out that the new tooth bud emits growth factors that recruit blood vessels and nerve cells, ending up innervated and plumbed just like a normal tooth.

      (I wonder if it might actually emit the nerve as part of its own differentiation. Many structures seem to start with a nerve bundle and then grow other tissues as directed by growth and differentiation factors secreted by nerve cells, rather than the other way around. So I'd expect the tooth bud to include its own proto-nerve cells, ready to "plug themselves in" to the rest of the nervous system, rather than recruiting nerve cells from their surroundings. Blood vessels seem to be recruited, however - which makes sense since they need a connection to the blood supply for their own nurishment, and many tissues need essentially the same plumbing.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  43. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by charyou-tree · · Score: 4, Informative

    The tooth is a healthy living organ requiring nutrients. You can remove this but than the tooth starts turning black

    A more signficant issue is that a dead tooth (ie, post root canal) tends to become brittle over time, and much more likely to suddenly break when stressed.

  44. Biblical argument against stem cell research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biblical argument against stem cell research

    Excerpt:

    This surprising question arises because of recent newspaper headlines, e.g. 'Senators use Bible for lessons on life in stem cell debate'.30 Gordon Smith, a Mormon Republican senator of Oregon, who normally opposes abortion, is reported as providing this amazing exegetical 'insight' on Genesis 2:7:

    'After reading the passage, Smith said it described a "two-stage process" for creating humans: First, God formed man from the dust of the ground. Then, the verse says, God breathed into man's nostrils "the breath of life; and man became a living soul."

  45. Unfortunately... by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1

    ... advancements in the treatment of AIDS have in fact led to complacency about getting the disease. No, I'm not blaming the researchers, I'm blaming the idiot kids who think AIDS is cured. But the fact remains than when you make progress on a health problem, people are inclined to think the problem is "cured".

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  46. But... by Phidoux · · Score: 0

    Two in the hand is worth one in Kate's Bush.

  47. Yes, but... by bluenote39 · · Score: 4, Funny

    can they grow hair with stem cells? If they can do that, now THAT would be a goldmine.. fake teeth dont look as fake as fake hair.

  48. mmmm...fang implants by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just wonder how long it'll be until we'll be able to design our own dentata. I'm more than a bit curious as to the thought of having a nice set of fang implants, but at the same time, the fact that most designer teeth are just fancy dentures is kind of a let down. A nice set of fangs, along with a real bite, would be awesome, IMNSHO.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    1. Re:mmmm...fang implants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, don't give the lameass goth kids another way to embarass themselves.

  49. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Keep Your natural teeth as long as you can.

    I am missing my front 3 teeth. One got knocked out in a car accident and within 1 year the two next to it had become so loose they needed to be pulled. The implants are nice but they just don't feel the same. It is weird. They are also about 1200- 1500 a tooth. And insurance will not cover very much of it (unless you have some stellar insurance)

  50. Recursive by carvalhao · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First they find that you can get stem cell from teeth Now you can get teeth from stem cells... Forget abou the chicken and egg tale, this one is way cooler! :)

  51. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by datastalker · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have lived 28 out of 29 years in New York (and one in California). I can tell you that it has nothing to do with environment and everything to do with genetics.

  52. Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by Myself · · Score: 3, Informative

    Humans already have a first and second dentition, why not simply encourage a third with hormones or something? You'd have baby teeth, teenage teeth, and over-the-hill teeth. When your third set started coming in, it would officially be time to go buy that Corvette and get a blonde bimbo for the passenger seat.

    On the subject of teeth: Dental care is good enough lately that people don't lose enough teeth to make room in the jaw for the rear molars, the "wisdom" teeth that come in later. It seems obvious to me, that we could tell in the early teens whether an individual's wisdom teeth will be in the way, and then simply prevent their growth with a squirt of botox. It would eliminate their costly and painful removal later.

    1. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

      Actually, some people that live long enough do get a third set of teeth naturally.

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    2. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by milletre · · Score: 1

      On the subject of teeth: Dental care is good enough lately that people don't lose enough teeth to make room in the jaw for the rear molars, the "wisdom" teeth that come in later.

      AFAIK, problems with arch length and wisdom teeth are more to do with being a racial mutt than anything else. Racially pure folks tend not to have as much trouble. From my Orthodontics text:

      Primitive human populations in which malocclusion is less frequent than in modern groups are characterized by genetic isolation and uniformity. If everyone in a group carried the same genetic information for tooth size and jaw size, there would be no possibility of a child inheriting discordant characteristics....The United States, reflecting its role as a "genetic melting pot," should have one of the world's highest rates of malocclusion -- which it does. - Proffit - Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd Ed.
      Third molars aren't the spare tires of the mouth ... tooth movement after loss or extraction of teeth is highly unpredictable, and when someone *does* lose a first or second molar, dentists don't sit back and watch the teeth behind slide into perfect occlusion; they tend to tip forward and cause all manner of periodontal and bite problems.
    3. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by nizo · · Score: 1

      It is interesting that you mention this, because I still have one of my baby teeth(!) Basically due to some wonderful hereditary deal my teeth didn't want to fall out when I was younger, and one of them never got a replacement. I have been told that the remaining lil' tooth will fall out sometime in my forties, so rather than a bridge this sounds much better. Considering they start trials in a few years, this should be good to go about the time I need my new tooth :-) So your therapy idea sounds great, except I am betting it might not help people like me....

    4. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      implant shark DNA so that our teeth keep being replaced as they fall out...

    5. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by Myself · · Score: 1

      Fascinating! I'd always noticed that pattern of perfect teeth in "ethnically obvious" folks, and the ethnicity didn't matter as long as it was strong. Finally having it explained is cool.

      I always thought the wisdom teeth were spares, from a time before modern dentistry, when having a few lopsided molars was better than none. The mismatched genes make sense too.

      So like everything else in my life, I have my parents to blame for this. ;)

    6. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Actually, some people that live long enough do get a third set of teeth naturally.

      And some people also have the third set show up earlier in life. (Like one kid I knew in high school who had to have 'em pulled.)

      A third set is not all sweetness and light, however. There tend to be a lot of problems from the second set not getting out of the way, or its accumulated maloclusions, tooth-losses, and other screwups keeping the new ones from erupting properly.

      What would make a lot of sense evolutionarily is for the jaw to produce a replacement tooth if the predecessor is lost. That way the new tooth could come in before the neighbors drift out of place. But apparently that's not in the cards for mammals - especially in OUR lifetimes - without deliberate hacking.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    7. Re:Well that's a roundabout way to do it. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      What would make a lot of sense evolutionarily is for the jaw to produce a replacement tooth if the predecessor is lost.

      Consirering that mammalian body is obviously capable of producing more than one set of teeth, there must be some reason for the process to not be continuous instead of limited to two (except for rodent incisors, and aardvarks).

      Probably they were just deemed unnecessary expense (and still are for everything except humans), for example lifetime of all but our most recent ancestors was so low that by the time second set of teeth was ruined you were just about ready for grave anyway, no point growing more, but now that we've tripled it things are different...

  53. Odd... by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't it make more sense to grow the teeth IN the jaw? I mean it's not like you haven't done so many times in your life. Just start the tooth bud off and implant it such that the nerves and blood vessels all attach properly. A little orthodonture and you're good as new.

    I thought somebody else was working on a way to stimulate the existing tooth buds in the jaw (you have extras) but I can't find a reference.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Odd... by Findus+Krispy · · Score: 1

      That's what they do apparently. I saw this this morning on Sky News and they described the process as taking some stem cells from your blood or marow, programming and culturing them in the lab, then injecting them into the gum. Two months later you have a new tooth.

      The body does all the hard work -- it just needs the stem cells programmed for becoming teeth in the gums. Just the same as your adult teeth really.

  54. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard tooth enamel, but at the price of impure precious bodily fluids, comrade. What's more important: teeth, or purity of essense?

  55. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...welcome our new bucked-toothed rodent overlords!

  56. Remember what finally killed organlegging by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 1

    The sad reality is that there's a huge underground market for kidneys and other organs, especially overseas. While growing new teeth are a start, the hope is that many of the other commonly failing organs will be replaceable over the next few decades.

    Hopefully the ability to grow new organs from scratch will outpace the development of immune suppressants. In Niven's universe, the only reason organlegging thrived was that it was possible to transplant organs without problems. Now we know that rejection is a very real issue and only the latest classes of immune suppressants are making it almost a reality today.

  57. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That seems quite odd - both my parents have had cavities, root canals, all sorts of nasty problems. Myself and my 2 brothers, however, haven't even had so much as a cavity, and I'm the youngest at 34.

    I would think flouridated water had at least something to do with that...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  58. Blimey. by Spunk · · Score: 1

    On average Britons aged over 50 lose around 12 teeth out of 32.

    Looks like this research is just in time!

  59. Which tooth? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    How would you tell the tooth what kind to be? A molar? incisors? bicuspid?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  60. Getting new teeth by SVDave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently got a couple of crowns; some 12 year-old fillings had failed, as they often do when they reach that age. I have a number of other fillings that will probably need to be replaced with crowns over the next few years.

    At first I wished that the teeth could be replaced with new ones, but then I realized something. The originals lasted 10-12 years before succumbing to decay, and the filled teeth lasted another 12 years. The crowns are made of porcelain-coated steel. They look great, are impervious to decay, and will probably last for the rest of my life. Why would I want to replace them with the troublesome things that were there before?

  61. Finally a solid business plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Grow new teeth using stem cell technology.
    2. Set up office in Arkansas.
    3. PROFIT!

    1. Re:Finally a solid business plan... by Zebano · · Score: 1

      or...
      2. Become a partner of the NHL

      --
      You hate your job? There's a support group for that. It's called "everybody" and they meet at the bar. -Drew Carey.
  62. yippee! by brian6string · · Score: 0

    I'm no religious zealot--well, maybe I am--but all the furor about stem cell research was that it would offer promise of repairing spinal cord injuries or brain diseases like Parkinson's. You should keep in mind that stem cells are "harvested" from dead human embryos.

    And no matter where you stand on the "when does life begin question," I doubt that anyone would think a dead human embryo is a fair price for giving a hockey player a better smile.

  63. Reality meets your fears by Xoder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nope, Vagina dentata are real, although exremely rare (scroll down).

    --
    The previous sig has been removed due to /. protecting your best interests
    1. Re:Reality meets your fears by Gulik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, Vagina dentata are real, although exremely rare...

      Vagina dentata
      What a wonderful phrase
      Vagina dentata
      Ain't no passing craze

      It means no weiner
      for the rest of your days
      It's a penis-free
      girl cavity
      Vagina dentata

      (Originally found here.

  64. *any* organ by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'Stem cells' can be told to create any organ if we learn how.

    Remember that in the beginning we are just a lump of stem cell goo.. and everything we have was grown from them..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:*any* organ by Watcher · · Score: 1

      No wonder so many people are opposed to using them-they're afraid that the stem cells would be used to grow them a brain.

  65. Imagine a beowolf cluster... by Anonymous+Cowabunga · · Score: 0, Redundant

    of teeth! Mmmm...

  66. NOOOOOO! by billcopc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been longing for the opposite: a complete replacement. Give me fake teeth that will never break or stain. Teeth that I can just roll down the window at the automated car wash and smile at the colored wax jets :) Teeth that can handle the abuse.

    There is nothing more annoying for me than to be constantly reminded to brush and floss and visit the wallet-raping dentist twice a year. Heck, make them snap-on so I can take them out, toss them in a polishing machine for 30 seconds and be good for the day.

    But don't go reinventing what's been broke since the dawn of time.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:NOOOOOO! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      These teeth exist already, they are called dentures.

      I guess what you're talking about, though, would be something with mounting sockets tied into your jaw?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  67. in addition to genetics and floride... by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Informative


    start with diet: you need calcium. and not a lot of processed sugar.

    good habits: brushing regularly. flossing. and not eating all the time (without brushing afterward).

    there are medicines that you can take while you are growing up that will impact the development of your teeth.

    diet and medicines that your mother was into before you were born.

    there's a lot that goes into healthy teeth and some of this was really quite recent.

    eric

  68. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Kryxan · · Score: 1

    If you cut off the end of your fingernails, you dont feel pain, or if you cut your hair you wont feel pain. Oh how annoying it is when you stop brushing your teeth and get a cavity that suddenly you feel pain! I mean come on evolution! Why can't I just let my teeth rot away and be none the wiser? Anyway on the serious side I see this as a great first step. Perhaps at 40 I could get a shot that would cause me to start losing my teeth and have new ones growing in to replace them. And I dont know about you, but I like having some feeling in my teeth.

  69. unfortunately, not. by amacbride · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Unfortunately, this is not quite correct. There's still a real problem in the US with the quality of the derived lines. Scientists in the US who are entirely privately funded (the Stanford and Harvard efforts come to mind) can do research on new lines, but anyone receiving Federal money cannot.

    It's no coincidence that this research is happening in the UK; they have a much more research-friendly policy.

  70. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Nos9 · · Score: 1

    I took horrible care of my teeth for a while there myself. I am looking at a $19,000 dentist bill to get it all fixed. Yes that was 3 zeros, I could buy a freaking car for that amount. So I have my choice, buy a car, or get my mouth back into a working order.
    Crowns cost on the order of $1500 a piece, throw in a couple of those for teeth that have gotten broken (had a nasty fall when I was younger, thrashed my front 4 and the work I had doen ont hem then is starting to crap out through my previous lack of care).

    I have good insurance it covers $1500/year of work.

  71. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    I asked my dentist that once. He kind of shrugged and said, "I don't know. To let you know when it's time to go to the dentist, I guess."

  72. why? by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    because there is an issue with decay where the crown meets the enamal on the outside.

    and the tooth probably failed because it died (or is dying) which means that the whole tooth is at risk.

    eric

  73. If God had meant Brits to have teeth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Using recently developed techniques, stem cells can be programmed to develop into teeth, and then inserted into the gap in a patient's jaw.

    And this is natural...mmm...how?

  74. Nightmares by DanTheLewis · · Score: 1

    Me and this guy I know both have bad dreams about all our teeth falling out, or about our teeth getting smashed, or about biting something too hard and losing teeth.

    I suppose now we will have nightmares about hideous mutant teeth bursting out of our cheeks in fountains of blood, and being called "Toothy".

    --

    Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
    A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
    1. Re:Nightmares by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one. About the only nightmares I ever have involve my teeth breaking or falling out.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  75. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Ouroboro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but you are mistaken. While genetics has a some effect on good tooth health, good diet and the presence of fluoride have an even greater effect.

    --
    When I want your opinion I will beat it out of you.
  76. No new technology needed. Your 8 year old... by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1

    ... is already going to get a new set of teeth in a few years. Go ahead and load him up on the sodas.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  77. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Stitch_626 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correction to correction: Teeth are not made up of enamel the crown of the tooth is covered with enamel. Check it out here... http://kidshealth.org/kid/body/teeth_noSW.html

    --
    Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten.
  78. Not Bloody Likely by milletre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIAD (American working in England, actually), and I don't see this stuff coming into anyone's mouth for many years to come.

    The hurdles here are the same as hurdles for growing ANY tissue from stem cells. You don't just turn stem cells loose and tell them to become teeth. There is a hugely complex interaction of intra- and inter-cellular communication that goes on that tells a given cell whether to become part of the pulp, whether to start secreting enamel matrix, becoming an odontoblast, etc. If this were just five years off, we'd only be five years off from growing *hands*, etc.

    Even if we could grow *a* tooth, we would have to grow the *right* tooth, especially in the "esthetic zone". How do we make sure that it *looks* like a central incisor with 11mm of enamel showing above the gingiva? How do we make the color right? Do we just grow something that is sort of tooth-like and put a crown on it automatically? Do we grow it in vitro and implant it in a surgical site? Do we grow it in situ? If so, how do we maintain the delicate balance of cellular influences in a mouth where someone ostensibly couldn't even keep their natural teeth in order?

    I think that this is waaaaaay off in the distance. Their five year estimate is pie-in-the-sky pulled-out-of-their-ass.

    In addition ... yeah, they've grown teeth in rats, but in their intestines, IIRC (intentionally in the intestines, but it's still a far cry from functioning dentition in the mouth).

    1. Re:Not Bloody Likely by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      In addition ... yeah, they've grown teeth in rats, but in their intestines, IIRC (intentionally in the intestines, but it's still a far cry from functioning dentition in the mouth).
      You know you've played too much System Shock 2 when the first image that pops into you mind after reading this is the 'Super System Shock Brothers' level inside the Many organism.

    2. Re:Not Bloody Likely by LesPaul75 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't see this stuff coming into anyone's mouth for many years to come.

      Maybe what you meant to say was "I hope I don't see this stuff coming into anyone's mouth for many years to come."

      As a dentist, you're required to be opposed to the advancement of technology. What other branch of medicine has remained in the dark ages so successfully? Your primary tools are a pointy stick and various drills.

      For fun, let's compare your work with mine. I'm a computer engineer. I work for a company that builds computer chips. If I were to sell you a computer that performed as well as the service that you, as a dentist, provide your customers, I think you would probably want a refund. Here's the computer that I would build for you:

      • You would have to clean the computer twice a day, at least. This would require a few minutes per cleaning, and you would have to buy computer cleaning supplies regularly.
      • Every six months, at least, you would have to bring the computer back to my office, where I would check it for normal operation and perform a more thorough cleaning than your twice-daily cleaning.
      • Every year or so, a chip would develop a flaw, which would need to be fixed.
      • The entire motherboard might become physically un-aligned, in which case I would use a complicated, unattractive mesh of metal and rubber bands to re-align it. Rubber bands, for crying out loud!
      • Eventually, entire chips would decay and fall off the motherboard. I would replace these, at tremendous personal cost to you, with fake chips.
      This would leave you with two choices. One: you could fork over thousands and thousands of dollars and keep your computer running, or, two: you could just choose not to have a computer.

      You would choose option two. Unfortunately, as your customer, I don't have option two. I have no choice but to pay and pay and pay for you to maintain my teeth, while you make ABSOLUTELY NO attempt to advance your science out of the dark ages of pointy sicks and drills and rubber bands. Why would you? Doing so would cut into your income, and possibly even make most of your services obsolete. Sure, it might make your patients' lives dramatically better, but that's not what's important.

      And, of course, when something new does come along, you berate and belittle it, in the hopes that no one takes it seriously. Nice work.
    3. Re:Not Bloody Likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, of course, when something new does come along, you berate and belittle it, in the hopes that no one takes it seriously. Nice work.

      Yeah, I'm sure that was the plan. After all, as long as the Slashdot crowd thinks the research won't pan out, all the research will stop.

      Luckily, you've exposed the plan and averted disaster, and now the research will be able to continue again.

  79. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Judg3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're right, once your teeth have matured, your nerves serve only one function - to tell the difference between hot and cold.

    To quote from the site:

    You might think that a tooth's nerve tissue is vitally important to a tooth's health and function, but in reality it's not. A tooth's nerve tissue plays an important role in the growth and development of the tooth, but once the tooth has erupted through the gums and has finished maturing the nerve's only function is sensory (it provides the tooth with the ability to feel hot and cold).

    In regards to the normal day to day functioning of our mouths, the sensory information provided by a single tooth is really quite minimal. Dentists realize that on a practical level it is pretty much academic whether a tooth has a live nerve in it or not. If a tooth's nerve tissue is present and healthy, wonderful. But if a tooth has had its nerve tissue removed during root canal treatment that's fine too, you will never miss it.


    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  80. Oh, God... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Funny
    Here comes the stem cell/penis enlargement spam...

    I may just stop using email completely... :-\

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Oh, God... by MicroBerto · · Score: 1

      personally, i wouldn't let that shit touch my penis (haha with a 10 foot pool, nonetheless!) ... what if it get ANOTHER penis off of your penis rather than enlarging it?!

      --
      Berto
  81. All comments on hygeine aside by mrhandstand · · Score: 1

    My wife had an accident when she was younger, and now has a large bridge on one side of her mouth. She would like to have real teeth replace a bridge. This might help. Remember that not all teeth are lost through poor dental hygeine

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
  82. Almost irrelevant? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stem cell research does not need to be used as a reason for killing off unwanted pregnancies.

    When was it ever used as such? Abortions get chucked in biohazard bags and incinerated like any other sort of medical waste.

    You're living in a fantasy world if you think that Superhero Bush stopped legions of money-grubbing women who were clamoring to make a quick buck off of their abortions.

    This is a non-issue if you take the time to think about it. Trash... or valuable medical research. Trash... or valuable medical research. Tough call there.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Almost irrelevant? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The real solution to preventing women from getting knocked up in order to make money on abortion - you would have to be so fucked up at that point, I can't even conceive of how fucked up you'd have to be to think that was a good idea, you'd have to be on like crack or something (thank you, Cocaine Import Agency!) Anyway the solution (sorry for the diversion) is to pass a law preventing people from gaining any monetary benefit from their abortions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Almost irrelevant? by HBPiper · · Score: 1

      I wasn't actually considering individual women profitting from having an abortion when I made the original statement. I was more thinking of stem cell research being used as one more "good" reason for on demand abortions. I do find the reference to the aborted fetus as "Trash" to be extremely troubling as I am sure was intended. The main point of my post was that fetal and/or non-specific stem cells are available from sources other than the destruction of a human embryo. A point that seems to be glossed over during much of the debate over whether or not the research should be occuring at all. I am very much pro stem cell research. I am just glad to see that there are several sources available that do not stem from a potential loss of life...

      The ban can be reviewed in detail here. As you can see, the ban was initiated in 1994, with no superheroes in sight.

      --
      "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  83. it's the gums... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... more than teeth. Well, it's both, but usually first as you age the gums recede too far, the tooth gets loose, nothing to hold it in, it gets wiggly, then comes out. It's like trying to keep a plant grtowing in 1 millimeter of soil, just not enough for the roots to hold.

    Still interesting technology.

  84. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by pizpot · · Score: 1

    I had a root canal when I was 12. I'm 36 now, and it is still fine. Its not black, just a shade or two darker than the rest.

  85. Do they have good programmers in the UK? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    stem cells can be programmed to develop into teeth, and then inserted into the gap in a patient's jaw.

    Can they program one to turn into a foot? Because then I'd have an excuse for all my off-color comments.

    Oohhhh... I can see some really nasty jokes coming on what body parts can be inserted there.

  86. flouride communist plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This .gov site talks about fluoridation of water being a communist plot. For all you tinfoil-hat guys, watch out!

  87. excersize??? by Findus+Krispy · · Score: 1

    Wow, I never knew spelling could be so creative!

  88. poor mice! by aquabat · · Score: 1
    Man, it must suck to be a test mouse in england!

    "Ready for a new trial, Bob. Where are the pliers?" ;(

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  89. Teeth, hair, and skin... by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    ...why not all three?

    Actually, I have to admit that the first thought that came to mind when you mentioned hair in the context of growing teeth was that of a dermoid cyst, which then led me to thinking about what might happen if, say, the programming of the stem cell were to have been a little "buggy". I mean really - tinkering with totipotential cells and having them implanted in your mouth? What if it turns into some kind of giant tumorous megatooth? You'd have to drink thousands of litres of cola to kill it...

    1. Re:Teeth, hair, and skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean really - tinkering with totipotential cells and having them implanted in your mouth?

      Guess how your teeth (and all the rest of you for that matter) grows in the first place?

  90. Hmm this is kinda neet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people are a bit nerdy. Their making good use of undiferentated human cells.

  91. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a class in comparative vertebrate morphology last term, and we talked about this very issue. Highly innnervated teeth is a mammalian trait. Other vertebrates (reptiles, amphibians, birds, fish, etc.) don't have a lot of nerves in their teeth. As you probably know, mammals have only two sets of teeth: the milk (or "baby") teeth and the adult teeth. The milk teeth fall out and are replaced during childhood/adolscence. Other vertebrates typically grow replacement teeth throughout their lives.

    Why is this the case? Mammals process their food with their teeth much more than other vertebrates do. This allows us to eat more difficult things like tough plant parts and insects with hard exoskeletons that are unavailable as a food source to other vertebrates. This is one of the keys to mammalian success.

    Mastication requires precise occlusion of the upper and lower teeth. Mammalian teeth have highly specialized forms for grinding, shearing, tearing, etc., and different regions of the jaw have different shapes of teeth. This precise occlusion is hard to maintain if teeth are constantly being lost and regrown, so mammals compromised: In exchange for really excellent, highly specialized teeth that allow them to exploit otherwise unavailable food resources, they only have two sets of teeth for their entire lives.

    Here's a geek analogy: you have a certain amount of money you can spend on a new computer. Do you spend the big bucks and get a really great piece of hardware (like a G5 PowerMac or something) or do you buy rubbish and get two of them? Mammals decided to spend the big bucks and buy quality. Judging by the success of mammals, I'd say they made a good decision.

    Having such awesome, precious teeth, mammals must protect them. The muscles of the jaw are easily strong enough to crush your teeth into powder. Having lots of nerves in teeth is one way that mammals prevent their teeth from premature destruction.

    So how did mammals get away with only having two sets of teeth? Two ideas: 1) selection is weaker on older organisms that have already reproduced. Problems related to teeth wearing out are generally found among older individuals. 2) Primitive mammals were typically small (like the size of most rodents). Body size is positively correlated with lifespan in mammals, so the early mammals probably idn't live to be very old. Perhaps they didn't live long enough to wear out their teeth. By the time larger mammals evolved the dentition system was sort of set in stone, and they had to make do in other ways (and there are some amazing adaptations found among mammals for preserving their adult teeth as long as possible).

  92. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by ChibiOne · · Score: 1

    I've heard that the Ph of saliva also has to do on creating an environment (inside your mouth) that will or will not favor dentail ailments.

  93. more important than teeth by moojin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a porcelain cap and it blends in with the rest of my teeth very well. Why not use stem cell technology to regenerate spinal disks? I just read a Newsweek article that 65 million Americans have disk related back pain. I am among them and have not been in a good mood for the past year. If you ever injure your back and have pain in your sciatic nerve, then you'll know what I mean...

    If you don't think spinal disks are important enough either, then you are probably correct, but are growing teeth from stem cells as important as the other things we can be doing will stem cells?

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  94. This tech is useless without... by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    the ability to grow back bone mass lost to periodontic disease. I have really bad teeth--not from lack of care, either--and unfortunately for me, I've suffered some gum recession and some bone loss where my teeth are attached to the jaw. Not a lot yet, but it's impossible to reverse at the moment. This new tooth technology will allow you to grow back a tooth in case you knocked it out in a fight or something, sure, but for people who have serious dental problems won't necessarily be helped by it. Especially because they haven't been able to stimulate root growth in the tooth yet, just the enamel (according to my dentist at least, who follows this mighty closely). Without a root, it's no better than the falsies they can make today, especially since the titanium socket bonds even better to your jaw than your real teeth do. Human bones grow very well into titanium for some reason. I'll be waiting for the shot that grows back a little bone and stimulates gum growth, at which time I'll jump for joy.

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
    1. Re:This tech is useless without... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      According to the article, especially the better one, it really seems like this does grow the roots as well as stimulates jaw bone growth.

  95. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bah. I take issue with this write-up.
    This is exactly what my dentist told me too. However, the problem is with this line:

    If a tooth's nerve tissue is present and healthy, wonderful.

    No, not wonderful. If I could, I'd have all the nerves removed from my teeth. All they do is hurt every time I eat something cold. Having slightly receding gums makes it much worse than for normal people. I've had one root canal, and that tooth which used to hurt a lot when I ate ice cream now doesn't feel anything at all. Now if I could only have that done easily for the other teeth.

  96. You are a simpleton, a sheep, a fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Please provide a poll from a site with slightly less inherit bias than christianity.com .

  97. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by juhaz · · Score: 1

    You're right, once your teeth have matured, your nerves serve only one function - to tell the difference between hot and cold.

    Yeah, sure they serve only a sensory function (since when did that become useless? are nerve endings on skin also useless because they're "only" sensory?) but there are few other of those sensory functions. They feel pressure somewhat, preventing you from biting too hard and crushing your teeth.

    Nowadays, they also alert you about cavities, though that's an unexcepted side effect, evolution probably didn't estimate arrival of dentists...

  98. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

    I'm in the same boat except for one thing: when my parents moved out here the lost the flouridated water (they moved when I was 2 and I'm second oldest). That leadds me to believe that fluoridation doesn't matter too much.

    --
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  99. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Veramocor · · Score: 1

    Well Usually after a root canal you get the tooth filed down and crown placed over the tooth. The crown is usually ceramic outside (matching your teeth color) and gold metal for the biting part. The crown protects the leftover tooth from cracking. They should also last 15+ years.

    --
    Veramocor
  100. Re:What do you want to do tonite, Brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same thing we do every nite, Pinky: TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!!

  101. A little too late. by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    I suppose I should have mentioned that with MY teeth, this is a subject I am following with great interest. There's this one tooth in particular that I finally had to get a crown on... so I guess I don't have much need for a new tooth now, I've already paid to get the damn thing fixed.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  102. Lycans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this works so I can get some live canine implants.

  103. NHL by XO · · Score: 2, Funny

    And, in related news, it seems that the National Hockey League Players Union has invested a quarter of a billion dollars into furthering the research into this wonderful new technology.

    (joke, but it should be real..)

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  104. This is *SO* awesome. by Phybersyk0 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was in an accident when I was a early teen, lost 3 of my front teeth, I've been using a Partial-Plate since then (i'm 30 now).

    I've researched having implants done, it's quite expensive, and also destructive to your mouth, the process requires filing/drilling of the bone in your mouth in order to insert titanium seats that will then be built-on and capped with false teeth. As someone who's been to the dentist a lot, this prospect is not the most desirable.

    BUT, Since I've heard of the work being done with stem-cells, I've always wondered why they've not tried teeth! What's inspiring about this process is:

    • It's your OWN stem cells. Your Source-Code. No rejection.
    • It's 100% natural, The teeth will continue to behave like real teeth and will wear and change shape along with the rest in your mouth.
    • No more fooling with gooey-glop to keep your teeth in.
    • No longer afraid to smile "too big" for fear someone might notice that the some of the teeth in your grill don't quite match.
    • No fear of flying teeth when you laugh.
    • Not having to pull out your teeth when you through the metaldetector at the airport. (they got these metal wires in there)
    • Not having to excuse yourself from a restaraunt dinner table because some piece of herb is stuck between the roof of your mouth and your partial.
    • being able to taste the full-range of food flavors.
    • No more headaches (literally) caused by ill-fitting mouth-gear.
    I would gladly volunteer for this. The promise of positive results is just too great.
  105. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all of those women getting abortions can fix their fucked up visages!

    Guess why I'm anonymous for this one!

  106. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to put a long explaination here of why genetics play a bigger role than you think but I will just say this.

    Genetics can play a HUGE role in teeth development and health. My entire family has bad teeth and it was not from bad diets or lack of flouride. It is just a bad gene that we have. Also, just to clarify I do not come from some redneck Arkansas family where one of every two males is named bubba but from your average american family that you see everyday

  107. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Teeth are made of neither bone (at all) or enamel (for the most part) as the incorrectly modded AC seems to think.

    Part forming most of the human teeth is called dentine, somewhat harder and denser material than bone, and that bulk is coated with even hard outer layer of enamel.

  108. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Nowadays, they also alert you about cavities, though that's an unexcepted side effect, evolution probably didn't estimate arrival of dentists...

    Or sugar...

    But if you have pain on one side of your mouth, you'll use the other side exclusively until the first side recovers - which it can do in minor cases.

  109. This is really, really stupid by mark-t · · Score: 1
    Good dental health care isn't that expensive, and if a person takes moderately good care of their teeth at home, and visits the dentist at once or twice annually (they say twice per year, but teeth are quite hardy when they are healthy, and once is often actually enough), and correct problems as soon as they are encountered, the total amount of money you will spend on your teeth on average in a single year is likely to be less money than you would spend on paying for only two movie tickets once per month for a year. That would cover the costs of all examinations, cleanings, xrays, and fillings. Root canals and other more expensive surgeries should never be necessary in practice unless you have some sort of accident, or you have left a tooth with cavities untreated for quite a long time.

    So, ironically, the people that could benefit the most from this (the class of people with so little disposable income that they can't afford to see a dentist regularly to take care of problems if and when they arise in the first place), wouldn't have enough money to pay for something like this anyways.

  110. A bit of teeth trivia by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Teeth are occassionally 'grown' in other areas of the body, most notably in women who have fibrous cysts. Not unusual at all to have them removed and they contain hair or teeth due to weird DNA foul-ups.

    -psy

    1. Re:A bit of teeth trivia by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      Are you pulling my teeth -- er, leg? Hair, for Christ's sake?! That is even more revolting than the 2nd challenge of Fear Factor I watched tonight.

  111. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about this business with cloning teeth. I just get the feeling it's going to come back to bite them someday. *rim shot*

  112. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by sysopd · · Score: 1
    I asked my dentist that once. He kind of shrugged and said, "I don't know. To let you know when it's time to go to the dentist, I guess."

    Oh man, its time to get a new dentist.

  113. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > and there are some amazing adaptations found among mammals for preserving their adult teeth as long as possible

    You mean brushing?

  114. Consumption of excess calcium is what leads.... by benzapp · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  115. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by sysopd · · Score: 1
    If I could, I'd have all the nerves removed from my teeth. All they do is hurt every time I eat something cold.

    Naiveity can be cute. What about subacute bacterial endocarditis (a severe infection of the heart lining)? Heart attack? Oral health as an indicator of overall body health is being proven today (there is a lot of research in this area, for example "...the Surgeon General found that oral health is often an indication of a patient's overall health"). Your nerves (in the teeth, or gums) are an incredibly important indicator. Without them you would live in the comfort of cold-indetection and without cavity notification for a short time but could be ignoring a huge problem. Check out if your teeth are killing you.

  116. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... selection is weaker on older organisms that have already reproduced. Problems related to teeth wearing out are generally found among older individuals."

    Whether or not an individual's teeth fall out has no impact on their offspring. Loss of teeth is related to oral hygiene of the individual so it cannot be selected for.

    "... the dentition system was sort of set in stone..."

    From an evolutionary perspective, nothing is set in stone. ... so are you retaking the course next semester, then?

  117. The kinds of people who could use this... by Vexler · · Score: 1

    1) Boxers 2) Ice hockey players 3) Rugby players 4) My grandma

  118. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wondered whether I should elaborate, but the original post was getting a bit long. I guess brushing would be considered an adaptaion, but not in the strict evolutioanry sense (yes, I realize you were joking :).

    I was thinking of rodents. Beavers are a good example. Their front incisors have indeterminate growth because they are not rooted. They just keep growing out of their gums for their whole lives, while the beavers keep wearing them down by chewing on wood all of the time. This is a common strategy for mammals that do lots of tooth-eroding activities. There is another rodent that has rootless molars that they use for chewing up some really tough grass (I forget the name of the species at the moment).

    Elephants use a different strategy. They delay development of their molars and emerge them one at a time from their gum as the previously-emerged molar wears out. They have the exact same number of molars as any other mammal, but this strategy gives them a "new" pair every so often. Old elephants die of starvation when they wear out their last pair of molars.

    Horses have absurdly long teeth that grind down very slowly throughout their lives. Horses have such tall cheeks because their upper and lower jaws are full of these long teeth.

    That's what I had in mind. And brushing too, I guess. This article would be another example of an adaptation to get around the limitations of two sets of teeth.

  119. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by asr_man · · Score: 1

    A typical reason for having a root canal in the first place is that the tooth has in fact already cracked due to age, stress, and/or disease. The restoration after the root canal reinforces the tooth against further damage, but more caries can always work against that.

    You can remove this but than the tooth starts turning black.

    What a load of rubbish. The pulp is the only "living" part of the tooth. Removing it (root canal) does not leave behind anything that suffers for lack of nutrition. Dentin is not a living tissue and has no nutritional needs.

  120. tooth bud transplants by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Neuromancer - once this gets off the ground I want me a set of shark teeth!

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
  121. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether or not an individual's teeth fall out has no impact on their offspring.

    Wrong. An individual who has no teeth will be at a serious disadvantage to even survive, let alone reproduce, especially if they have teeth that are specialized for a particular diet (like eating tough grass or crushing mollusk shells or something). In other words, it impacts the potential to have offspring. If the tooth loss has a genetic basis, then any offspring that the toothless individual does manage to have will be similarly disadvantaged when they reach reproductive age.. However, there would be comparatively little selection on a gene that caused all of their teeth to fall out the minute they finished reproducing.

    Loss of teeth is related to oral hygiene of the individual so it cannot be selected for.

    This is pretty unique to humans in western cultures who eat too much refined sugar. Tooth decay like modern humans get is vanishingly rare in nature.

    From an evolutionary perspective, nothing is set in stone. ... so are you retaking the course next semester, then?

    "Sort of set in stone" refers to phylogenetic inertia. Certain things just don't happen very often in evolution because of the difficulty of redesigning an organism. Why do ostriches have wings? Why do humans have an (apparently) nonfunctional vermiform appendix? Why do vertebrates have two sets of limbs instead of three sets? Why am I feeding a troll?

    Maybe you should take a few biology courses yourself, mate.

  122. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by GrammarFairy · · Score: 0

    Whoo! You need some work, and I'm not talking about dentures!

    You've got one primary recurring issue, and a couple of occidental minor ones. Nothing a little grammar check can't fix, though.

    The big thing today is "than/then". Here's your x-rays:

    Since you have root canales than you know [...]
    You can remove this but than the tooth [...]

    We'll need to do a grammatical canal here, and take those things out. I've had a replacement crafted, you may have heard of it. It's the remarkable "then".

    "Then" is a part of speech that belongs to the Preposition family, and is typically used to start a supplemental phrase, often found just after a conjunction.

    What we've got in here, see, is "than". Than's a comparator, and needs two things to work on. Something like "your post sounds more clumsy than a drunken ogre".

    Now that we have that cleared up, I think we're good for today. Oh, there's some other issues like "canales" and "brook", but I think they may be typos that will clear up on their own. We can save those for another visit if need be.

    Proofread every post, and don't forget to spellcheck!

    -GrammarFairy, DDS

    GrammarFairy dust for you:
    ~.,.'"`'~.,'"'.

  123. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by sysopd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You need to realize that the dental industry (as well as many other healthcare industries) make a lot more money off of problems than clean teeth.

    Think of your bank or credit card company. I have a friend who is terrible paying bills, but pays them-- late. He gets more credit card applications in the mail and phone calls than anyone I know. Why? Simple. The money is in the service fees and racking up interest. Your bank is the same way with ISF (insufficient funds) check-bounce fees, etc. They're not going to close your account- they're making a huge return on any investment they give you (a line of credit for ISF).

    The point is, like those companies, healthcare providers make much more money on fixing rather than preventing problems. For example, to prevent dental problems one could use an oral irrigator, a good tooth cleansing agent, a harmful-bateria killing solution, and minerals to help in tooth regeneration (remineralization). This in addition to the right information. How much does this cost compared to a bridge? Compared to 10 cavities, 3 root canals over several years? Last I checked the dentist only gave me a toothbrush and floss.

    I would seriously suggest reading some of the information out there.

  124. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    This link you provided seems to call for better oral hygeine to prevent bacteria from forming at the base of the teeth, at the gumline. It doesn't say anything at all about them getting in the roots of the teeth, or about root canals having any effect.

    So are you trying to say that people shouldn't get root canals then? What do you propose people do when their roots get infected?

  125. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by dnobel · · Score: 1

    Root canals are performed (usually) due to bacterial invasion of the dental pulp by bacteria you see in what a layman may call a cavity (caries). Your pulp contains nerves, blood vessels, connective tissue, various other stuff. As the pulp chamber is a rigid chamber with no room for the inflammatory process, a constant bacterial invasion results in death (necrosis) of the tissue in the pulp. A root canal procedure is one in which a dentist or endodontist ATTEMPTS to remove all pulp within the tooth to prevent pain and, more importantly, a spread of infection to the rest of the oro-facial complex. If you leave a significant amount of pulp on the inside of the tooth two things can happen. The infection will continue and spread to the bone, or the tooth will discolor from the dead tissue hangin around the inside of the tooth. Therefore, no, you shouldn't get a discolored tooth from a properly administered root canal treatment.

  126. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    However, there would be comparatively little selection on a gene that caused all of their teeth to fall out the minute they finished reproducing.

    Given the fact that primates have culture, having an older relative who can teach you things, not to mention provide for you, can be helpful.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  127. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by sysopd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So are you trying to say that people shouldn't get root canals then? What do you propose people do when their roots get infected?

    I was referring to notion that nerves/nerve endings in the teeth/gums are not necessary and that evolution should have removed them.

    There are several alternatives to root canals. In reality, your problem could be misdiagnosed. Root canal should be an absolute last resort. You could get the tooth pulled (low-tech alternative), you could also take proper care of your teeth and let them heal themselves. It could be the case that your teeth are too far gone and you must have one-- however, you really should fix the cause of the problem and take this time as an opportunity to fix it at the root (no pun intended). At this point, you should never have another root canal.

    Check out this page which directly answers the question about the need for root canals by Dr. Robert O. Nara. That page has a lot of good information, much of it from Dr. Nara, and is a good source of information on oral health. It is run buy a guy who wants to get the information out because he feels it has helped him and his families health but isn't widely available.

  128. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flouride is only beneficial in moderate amounts, i know from personal experience. the town i live in(holland, VA) had(and still does) 6x the recommended level of flouride in the water. nobody knew this when i was growing up, and my doctor back then prescribed flouride vitamins for me. which has ruined my teeth, the enamel in spots became brittle and chipped off exposing lower layers of the teeth that stain very easily. not only does this weaken the teeth but it would look like i have a mouth full of cavaties if not for the coating i had put on my front teeth.

    bring on the test tube teeth baby!

  129. To the miracles of science by jonnystiph · · Score: 1

    I applude you and your efforts. I knew that whole dental care was a scam. When my current teeth decide to vacate, I will just get new ones. I knew the day would come, no more hearing "thats only set of teeth you'll ever have" and so forth. Finally my day has arrived.

    --

    If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  130. People Teeth I Say by 0mni · · Score: 1

    They used mice yes, but they wouldn't of used mice teeth, instead they would have grown some people teeth on mice bones.

  131. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Wirr · · Score: 1
    I understand why they're necessary, but come on, why do they have nerves in them?

    Interesting question - I asked myself the same just the other week.
    I asked my dentist, what the evolutionary cause for teeth nerves was - no answer.
    Then I met a college buddy how studied biology - answer: Ask the big guy above.
    Do I hate that answer or what? It's not even a fucking answer.

    So does anybody know?
    I read the other replys, but nothings seems to be for sure.
    Are there no papers about the subject?

    Someone must have asked themselves that before....?

  132. I feel sorry for Fairies... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 1

    Don't they realize that the Tooth Fairies job is hard enough and now they have to deal with these counterfeit teeth popping out of nowhere all over the place! Think of the Tooth Fairies will ya!

  133. Late Breaking News... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 1

    "The Tooth Fairy has just filed for bankruptcy, more news at eleven."

  134. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    "Certain things just don't happen very often in evolution because of the difficulty of redesigning an organism."

    Uhhhh. You're suggesting then that evolution wants to head a certain way, but it's too difficult? Maybe, the need simply doesn't develope.

  135. obligatory by jacobhoupt · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, me and all my friends are having a party tonight.

    Anyone else here in Arkansas is welcome to attend, I'll be popping the beers with my teeth.

    --
    -- the only good thing the French ever did was two chicks at one time
  136. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flouridated water was presented by the communist threat to zap an impurify our precious bodily fluids.

  137. I thought this, too, back when I was a kid. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    No more brushing my teeth and all the Coke I can drink!

    Take that, Mother, with all your dire predictions about my teeth rotting out.


    You know, back when I was a kid in late elementary school I was an avid reader of science fiction. I remember thinking that by the time my adult teeth were starting to wear out or become dinged or decayed the technology would be in place to grow replacements.

    Of course that was back in the late '50s. I didn't imagine something like the FDA and the Thalidomide parinoia putting the skids under medical technology development.

    It's about TIME they got around to it!

    (Fortunately, dental hygene isn't just about keeping 'em from rotting, or I'd probably be weraing dentures by now.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  138. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by j0d3r · · Score: 1

    Endodontically treated teeth do not discolor due to lack of nutrients. Once the pulp of the tooth is removed, it must be filled with an inert material to seal the instrumented canal. More often than not, discoloration is due to incomplete removal of filling and sealing materials from the pulp chamber. The metallic additives placed in the gutta-percha filling so that it will show up nicely on an x-ray oxidize over time, discoloring the tooth. It usually isn't visible, though, since the filling material shouldn't extend above the level of the bone. Other less frequent causes include pulp tissue remnants left behind and various intracanal medications. And by the way, an endodontically treated tooth is still surrounded by neurovascular tissue in the periodontal ligament which attaches it to the surrounding bone, so it's more "brain dead" than "dead"..

  139. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Silh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Amoung dentists, we do consider dentin is a living tissue (or at least, most dentists I know would consider it living). It has microscopic tubules inside in which there are cells or extensions of cells that are in the pulp. If you cut into it (eg. when doing a filling), pain will be percieved. People with recession and exposed root surfaces often temperature sensitivity since the dentin is exposed.

    Does dentin require any nutrition? That is a bit of a point of debate still. When a root canal is done, the pulp tissue is removed, and the tooth is essentially dead. Normally, the pressure from inside the pulp causes slow fluid flow through those tubules to the outside. I'm not sure if anybody has determined exactly what that does (perhaps some sort of defensive flushing mechanism has been speculated). I don't know of any studies that have been done about teeth with root canal treatment (and hence lacking this fluid flow) being more vulnerable to anything either.

    Teeth which have had root canals do dry out though, and thus the dentin does become slightly more brittle (and hence prone to fracture). More so, the access opening that has to be made to do the root canal weakens the tooth structurally (think of a cylinder with closed ends, and then you put a hole through one end into the hollow center)... hence again root canal teeth being more fragile. And as mentioned, the root canal is often done because of prexisting factors such as large amount of decay or trauma. Therefore, a crown is often highly recommended to reinforce what is left. Much better than having the tooth fracture straight down the root (which I have seen quite often with uncrowned root canaled teeth) and then having to be pulled because you can't fix it.

    As to the tooth turning black, that often is a result of the oxidation of the materials that are used to seal the canal up after root canal treatment is performed.

    And this technique of growing a new tooth? I hope people are very patient, since the process to grow a new tooth will probably take years (at least, that's how long it takes for you body to form one when you are young).

    --
    -- Silhouette
  140. Does this mean that it won't be a man's life by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    in the British Dental Association any more? "Lemming of the BD, Lemming of the BD, Lemming of the BDAaaaaa!"

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  141. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up in a place where there was a lot of fluoride in the water, and the schools also had programs to provide additional fluoride.

    And where is that? Soviet Russia? I'd be concerned about the purity of my bodily fluids if i were you.

  142. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by shnives · · Score: 1

    no worries about this ever becoming useful. there have been many teeth transplants in hospital settings, usually from impacted wisdom teeth being removed and put in a gap. the success rate is very low, under 1 % i believe. take artificial implats, with a titanium bolt that is actually bio reactive (the titanium fuses with the bone for a stronger seal), and you have a 95% success rate. given the success of the artificial teeth, cloning of teeth will be used more to study cloning individual body parts more than dentistry.

  143. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    evolution probably didn't figure on you living past 30 either... but, contrary to teenagers wishes , here we are :-)

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  144. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by asr_man · · Score: 1

    Very interesting. I wasn't aware of dentinal tubules so thank you for this informative reply. Here is more information:

    The tubules are devoid of nerve tissue except for very short extensions.

    The nerve cell bodies reside in the pulp.

    Over time the pulp may lay down ... reparative dentin.

  145. Get some scope and a stick of gum by phorm · · Score: 1

    Recent research has also shown that, for people that don't like flossing, regular mouthwashing with an antiseptic has almost the same effect as a good floss (it kills the germs between the teeth if you swish it around well enough).

    Now, sometimes you should still floss, but with regular mouthwashing you can reduce that. It's also much more convenient to have a small mouthwash container (there are some that are "concentrate" - just add water to accompanying mini-cup) than to stop for a brush+floss after lunch at work or whatnot.

    I've also found that chewing a quick (sugarless) stick of gum helps clear off the back teeth. If it's a sticky gum, it will lift a lot of stuff off the teeth as you chew. Of course, that means the gum gets nasty rather quickly, so spit it out and go for the mouthwash afterwards.

  146. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by juhaz · · Score: 1

    no worries about this ever becoming useful. there have been many teeth transplants in hospital settings, usually from impacted wisdom teeth being removed and put in a gap. the success rate is very low, under 1 % i believe.

    1% might be true if we're talking about teeth from a different person (they're probably rejected, like all foreign tissues), but it's much better than that if they're your own. Otherwise no-one would even bother implanting teeth back.

    My dentist told me, while implanting three teeth that made unfortunately made too close friends with asphalt, that possibility of any one of them going loose within few years was about 33%, so far (7 or 8 years, I think) they've all stayed.

    Even this is probably because they're, strictly speaking, dead. In a case like the one described in article where a new teeth actually grows from a "bud" and promotes nerves and blood vessels to grow back, success rate should be very near 100%.

  147. Teeth are for gay people (ATHF) by hartba · · Score: 0

    Cavities are an invention of the dental industry and the liberal media to sell useless products and pastes. Now I've read the arguments on both sides and I see no evidence to support brushing your teeth. Ever. Besides, I got rid of my teeth at an early age because I'm straight. Teeth are for gay people. That's why fairies come and get 'em.

    --
    60 percent of the time, my comments are right everytime.
  148. Re:New real teeth? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh, my comment is not incorrectly modded; if you want to be that specific, I already knew that teeth are made of layers: enamel (outer), dentin (beneath the enamel) and the innermost part, the pulp, consisting of the nerves and blood vessels. My point was that teeth are not made of bone as the parent post suggested, and the enamel is the part of the tooth that bears the brunt of chewing anyway. I've certainly spent enough time and money at the dentist (due to my childhood love of candy and soda) to have been lectured ad nauseum on tooth structure. Hence my extreme interest in this topic. See: http://32teethonline.com/intropage2.htm. I guess this is what I get for posting before I've had my full coffee ration for the day:-)

  149. Growing Teeth by marutherf · · Score: 1

    check out Dentigenix this is a startup you should keep your eyes on.