Slashdot Mirror


WiFi Gone Wild

b4k4 writes "According to this news release, the Texas Department of Transportation is proposing to install hotspots at all 84 Safety Rest Stops and 12 Travel Information Centers statewide. This would be in addition to the four test locations already in place along US287." Reader polluted notes that Portland is working on free WiFi. An anonymous reader sent in word of this year's wifi-shootout, a contest to maximize the range for an 802.11b connection. And Roland Piquepaille writes in regarding cows wearing WiFi collars, which I'm afraid reminds me of a crummy sci-fi movie.

180 comments

  1. Saftey measures... by Ninwa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The places that have wireless networks should also issue handouts concerning possible security problems to cover their butts. How long until you hear someone getting sued because someone borked their computer over a wireless network?

    1. Re:Saftey measures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How long until you hear someone getting sued because someone borked their computer over a wireless network?

      Is that some sort of Swedish hacking term? Bork a Bork a Borka !

    2. Re:Saftey measures... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      It's no more dangerous than sitting in a cafe next to someone else who's got wi-fi enabled. Or at a theater production, or in a stadium.

    3. Re:Saftey measures... by gb506 · · Score: 1

      The places that have wireless networks should also issue handouts concerning possible security problems to cover their butts. How long until you hear someone getting sued because someone borked their computer over a wireless network?

      Not only that, I have serious concerns about the government providing ubiquitous connectivity services in general. When we all rely on the government for our net connectivity, there's a hell of a lot less red tape involved with capturing the entirety of Joe Public's electronic communications.

      When the gov't has lured everyone into using the same connectivity system, Law Enforcement can begin to use statistical analysis to predetermine "deviant" or "criminal" activity or even intent. Revenue Departments can compile purchase information to compare dollar outflow with stated dollar inflow, etc. Even though I'm not a "deviant" or a "criminal", I don't like that too much...

    4. Re:Saftey measures... by ibjhb · · Score: 1

      Should each road or sidewalk have a handout so when people drive and get in an accident the state/city/etc doesn't get sued?

      When people opened their browser you could have a disclaimer they must agree to... past that, there isn't much you could do.

    5. Re:Saftey measures... by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      RTFA, and then the RFO issued by TxDOT. They aren't providing the service, but contracting with private companies to install the network.

      Actually, reading the RFO makes me wonder if they will get many bids. They are expecting these companies to cover their own operating costs from a kiosk for those without wireless equipment. They insist that TxDOT get wireless internet service for free for their own use, and imply that wireless users shouldn't be charged for the service. I don't see a Kiosk getting enough use to cover a broadband connection into the middle of nowhere (the RFO expects that they companies will use a satelite connection, but doesn't require it), the hardware for the kiosk, and the inevitable losses from vandelism.

    6. Re:Saftey measures... by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      Correction: It's JUST AS dangerous. The same goes for your local coffee shop. Someone will eventually try and sue them... who knows. Perhaps those are the same users who don't even know their PC is a spam drone.

  2. Let's hope they are not the last by erick99 · · Score: 0
    The article notes that Texas is the first state to implement wireless hotspots at their rest stops. This is a great idea and, hopefully, other states will follow suite.

    Happy Trails!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  3. Crowding by officepotato · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Won't this cause parking problems as people stay at rest stops as long as their battery lasts, rather than long enough to do their business?

    1. Re:Crowding by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why would they waste their time there, just for fun?

      I think you think that there's more nerds out there than there is.

      However truck drivers & others who are forced to spent some time on these stops would really benefit from this.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Crowding by Wire+Head · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No need to worry about crowding, I've been to Texas rest stops.
      The rest rooms are basically built over open latrines. Nasty stench.
      No running water, no phones. Some do have (electric) lights though.

      --


      WireHead

      The previous message was created with 100% recycled words.
    3. Re:Crowding by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

      My Pontiac Vibe GT has a 115 volt outlet. Screw my battery, how long can I sit at idle with my A/C on?!?

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    4. Re:Crowding by AubreyTurner · · Score: 2, Informative

      I stopped at one of these rest stops in Hardemon county last week on the way to Colorado. I was surprised at just how nice this stop was compared to the older ones. The bathrooms were new and clean and the place included an information kiosk with an Old-West information display in the main building along with a playground for the kids on the side and several covered tables for picnics. It was really quite nice.

      I vaguely recall seeing something about internet access there, but didn't really have time to pay attention to it though.

      --

      Fear the Government that fears your Computer.
    5. Re:Crowding by Jahf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Set a 1 or 2 hour time limit on the DHCP lease and only lease to a MAC once per day. Sure, you will get the occasional geek who knows how to change their MAC, but it prevents the majority of the problem.

      I'm more curious to know when the first hackers are going to realize how easily they can be anonymous. And I'm sure someone will say "they'll probably have cameras" but with a pringles can you don't need to be near that camera.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    6. Re:Crowding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You say that like a Pontiac Vibe actually makes your dick bigger or something. It's a girly car! Get some pride.

    7. Re:Crowding by Joe+Decker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      However truck drivers & others who are forced to spent some time on these stops would really benefit from this.

      Ended up talking to a trucker last week, we'd both stopped on a road with a view of Mt. Hood to photograph, and got to talking. Apparently WiFi in truck stops is quite the rage, just for this reason.

    8. Re:Crowding by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      I am sure there are some like this, but running water and phones seem the norm to me. As well as vending machines installed behind metal barriers.

      In case anyone is wondering, I am refering to Texas rest stops.

      Now what I don't get are all the Texas Picnic areas. They never get used, as they are just a parking lane and a picnic table. About half the time there is a cover over the table.

    9. Re:Crowding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score one for VOIP...

    10. Re:Crowding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Won't this cause parking problems as people stay at rest stops as long as their battery lasts, rather than long enough to do their business?


      Yeah, wouldn't we all rather spend an hour surfing the Web at a rest stop instead of...getting the damn long drive over with, already!

      I think most people would rather hit the road and get there sooner.
    11. Re:Crowding by Tongo · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Besides truckers, I would see people just catching up on email and maybe checking road conditions ahead of them. I couldn't see a lot of peole hanging out at a rest stop just to chat or play games for hours on end. It would be much easier to get the drive over with and do it on the other end.

    12. Re:Crowding by Exocet · · Score: 1

      I have mod points and really wanted to moderate in this article but there's no way I can't reply to this.

      First of all, this is a rest stop. You will stay there for an extra five to 10 minutes, tops, to check for really important emails or weather info. And that's if you're really lax with your schedule. When I'm going on a road trip long enough to warrant a stop at a Rest Stop it's about long enough to run into the bathroom and walk around for about 1-2 minutes. Then back on the road - daylight's burnin'.

      As for people realizing they can be anonymous... Ha! If you are a "hacker" and haven't figured out that being easily or quickly tracked down is a thing of the past ...then you are NOT a "hacker".

      Right now I can take my gear (laptop, good 200mw Senao wifi card, good omni roofmount/cantenna, DC-to-AC converter) and get access virtually anywhere I want. Portland, OR is a very unwired city. If I want to try to break into some web site or do something naughty, I'll wardrive for five minutes, find an open-looking AP with a good parking spot and test it out. Usually internet access can be had with absolutely NO trickery (ie: you get a DHCP-assigned IP just by asking, along with proper DNS stuff and all that) 4 outta 5 times.

      If you think you might have got someone's interest/are being "traced"/someone's going to the physical address of the owner of that IP ...Just drive away. Go a half-dozen blocks. Try again. Eventually, if you aren't a complete idiot yet you keep tripping alarms, some noisy or observant person might spot you idling in your car and note the make/model/colour/lic. plate. Otherwise, the police or feds are going to have to shut down a large-block radius and search every car and every person with a laptop-sized bag or bigger and hope that the suspect was too stupid to simply stash the laptop somewhere convenient. Or, if you're a real badass, just get some funding from one of those naughty terrorist organisations and get a bunch of $200 laptops, cheap cards, cheap antennas and good batteries. If you think you're really going to be caught, chuck it in a trash can and walk away.

      Lastly ...There will be no cameras, because you are not sitting at a traffic light or in a very confining street. Think about it. Which car is the camera going to take a picture of?

      I love WiFi, but if you're a bad hacker type, the world is currently your oyster. Wanna release a virus? Do it wirelessly - but be sure your code is anonymous, too. :P Wanna do some "anonymous" but not terribly high-volume spam (bandwidth limitations of home users)? Wireless. Wanna harass some other internet user? Wireless.

      If you keep it up long enough you'll probably get sloppy and get caught. For some limited duration/scope activities, though, it's very, very difficult to get caught.

      --
      Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
  4. is it all free in these places? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    because if i'm gonna have to pay why not just hit a net lounge at the pit stops/nearest town

    1. Re:is it all free in these places? by djsmiley · · Score: 0, Troll

      lol...

      and the movie was battle royal?!

      Free wifi is a dangerious idea tbh. if its free, you need some kind of authrisation on the netowrks first, so you know whos connecting.

      They should set up some kind of service, where they can check whom you are first, so if you go on some hacking spree they know whom to blame.

      A simple online form to fill in will do, but you get the idea. (like having the isp know whom you are!)

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    2. Re:is it all free in these places? by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

      They should set up some kind of service, where they can check whom you are first, so if you go on some hacking spree they know whom to blame.

      Wow, sounds like China. But no, this isn't needed because of free WiFi. At the moment I can go to an internet cafe and surf the web anonymously. All I have to do is hand over cash (well, it was possible in Rome. I'm assuming it's possible in Australia and America).

  5. A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Sorry, my access point grazed out of range."

    "How would you like your firewall? Rare, medium, or well?"

    --
    John
    1. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by chabotc · · Score: 1

      FYI, while your remark was quite funny i think you forgot to follow the link. While the headline does insinuate herding WiFi access points, thats not what it's actually about

      It talkes about setting up programmable Virtual Fences (as you already have for dogs) so that multiple herds can be remote controlled from a central location..

    2. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      /me imagines the effect of the release of the CowBlaster worm.

    3. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by chabotc · · Score: 2, Funny

      AC Wrote: /me imagines the effect of the release of the CowBlaster worm.

      Hmmm good inspiration! Hell you wouldn't even need to write a worm or virus to wreck some serious havoc.. Just install a WiFi jammer in your van, drive by the grazing fields, and let the stampedes begin! Could give a whole new meaning to war-driving :-)

    4. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, I read the link. And the "virtual fences" don't work the same way as they do for dogs. The dog radio containment systems I'm familiar with use a buried antenna wire to mark the dog's range -- if the dog approaches the wire, they're corrected. The cow collars actually have GPS receivers, and the rancher downloads a "virtual fence" to the collar. The corrections come whenever the collar detects the animal has strayed, and the cow is "rewarded" by not being shocked when it's heading home.

      The cow collars sound a lot better than the ordinary radio dog collar, because they work both ways. If Fido ever jumps beyond his radio fence, he is corrected for attempting to go back home over the antenna, so he is rewarded for NOT coming home.

      Of course GPS accuracy isn't as important with cows as it is with dogs. In the suburbs, the 12-60 feet of error of the average GPS receiver would let Fido crap in the neighbor's yard or get run over in the driveway. In the country, it's really only important to keep the cows off the roads. Whether or not they stray too close to Charlie's pasture isn't as big a deal.

      --
      John
    5. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      "Quick Cletus, get yer gun! Our cattle are being rustled by pirate hackers using zombies! I think they work for the Russian mafia!"

      "... Pa, have you been smoking that duck-weed again?"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "How would you like your firewall? Rare, medium, or well?"

      Speaking as a Texican, you missed one.

      Mooing.

      But only with steaks...

    7. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by allism · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound better to me - in fact, it sounds worse. Dogs eventually learn where the electric fence is, so they stopped being shocked on a regular basis - only on the very occasional instances when they get stupid and try to head for the fence (my in-laws have one of these fences, and after the first few days their dogs have stayed well away from the fences).

      The cows won't get the reinforcement that the fence is in the same place every day. They won't be provided with a visual cue (i.e. an actual fence that gets moved) to help them know where to hang out.

      I can't imagine that the stress of seemingly random shocks can be good for the mental health of the cows, or the quality of their meat and milk (I'm not terribly familiar with cow milking, but I know in human females stress levels have a severe impact on nursing).

    8. Re:A whole 'herd' of new excuses? by plover · · Score: 1
      Good point. I wonder if they'd be better off with a pair of leg stimulators -- something like ACE bandages holding electrodes on their forelegs that would zap them making them think they were snakebit or something. Of course, panicking a cow isn't likely to be a productive action either. Maybe the "feeling" of something hard would cause them to back up and turn around, like a Roomba bumping into a chair leg.

      Another possibility would be to have more than one electrode pair on the collar. Just as you turn a horse by annoying it with the bit, you might be able to "turn" the cows by zapping the side you want them to avoid.

      Finally, if the ranchers are worried about labor costs they might be better off installing remote control gates rather than rely on hired hands to open and close them.

      Anyway, I thought it was a cool idea, and I'm sure they did too. There are just a few bugs to work out, cow cooperation being the biggest.

      As an aside, cows on Australian ranches of the sort described in the article are most likely beef cattle. Meat production isn't affected by stress nearly as much as milk production is.

      --
      John
  6. Complete with... by TheReal_BarkMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    vending machine delivered temporary accounts.

  7. Okay, bad pun time by grunt107 · · Score: 0

    So my wifi herd would be a cluster of CP-moos... I'd have a Moo-o-wolf cluster... Now if I can just train sharks to do my bidding!!!

  8. Great idea, but... by pointbeing · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why do cows need Internet access?

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
    1. Re:Great idea, but... by neonstz · · Score: 1
      Why do cows need Internet access?

      I have no idea, but we better not tell them about this site.

    2. Re:Great idea, but... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Great idea, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do cows need Internet access?

      To get out of high floodwaters. (There's a flood in the Dallas-Fort Worth area right now)

    4. Re:Great idea, but... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh very original. Yet again Slashdotters miss the point. Whenever they see someone doing something new, someone has to diss-it as unnecessary. "Why do I need a mobile phone when there's phone booths?" "Who really needs the source code to an operating system?" "Who needs broadband when dial-up works just fine?" and now "Why do cows need Internet access?"

      In a few years, all cows will have access to the Internet. And thanks to their always-on wireless connections, they'll make up the vast majority of Internet users. 75% of Slashdot posts will be from cows, and thanks to the mass enfranchisement of other cattle, the Goatse.cx site will actually feature a picture of a goat.

      What's more, you'll benefit. Right now, the Internet is dominated by spammers and trolls. But with an influx of cows, sheep, chickens, pigs, and other farmyard animals, the quality of discussion and the quality of content is likely to radically increase. All these animals know a hell of a lot more than most Slashdotters about many ordinary topics - chickens, for example, will be able to tell you about eggs, something very few Slashdotters are expert in. Ask Slashdot will finally stop having useless topics like "How do I set up my Linksys router?" or "What wallpaper should I have on my desktop?" and instead feature discussions about types of grass to eat, avoiding foxes, and telling whether your feed has dead similar animals mixed into it.

      Likewise, YRO will be dominated by discussions about avoiding the slaughterhouse, getting into the wild, etc. None of this "Ooooh, some obscure copyright bill might violate my right to download MP3s", this time it'll be important life and death issues.

      So don't knock it. Cows have just as much right to be on the Internet as you or I. How dare you suggest they don't "need" Internet access!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  9. can always get your /. by millahtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, nerds in texas can always get their /. fix when traveling. They just have to stop of at a rest area, get some vending machine food, a soda, stop off at mr. porclyn and /.

    Although, hopefully not all at the same time.

    1. Re:can always get your /. by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chips, soda, the toilet, and slashdot.

      Just like home!

    2. Re:can always get your /. by southpolesammy · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...stop off at mr. porclyn and /.

      Well, that would explain some of the shitty moderation going on here lately...

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    3. Re:can always get your /. by kemapa · · Score: 1

      Now, nerds in texas can always get their /. fix when traveling. They just have to stop of at a rest area, get some vending machine food, a soda, stop off at mr. porclyn and /.

      Although, hopefully not all at the same time.


      This brings up an interesting problem with the proposed hotspots. Only people traveling can really take advantage of them. You see, I live in Texas and have traveled all around the state. Most of Texas is not populated and you drive hours without seeing anything but rest stops (and even those are about 100 miles apart). Thus, you won't have a bunch of nerds congregating at the rest stops because they are simply too far away from any cities. Hours away, in some cases. So for people who are traveling this will be a nice plus, but if you visit the rest stations here in Texas you won't see very many nerdy looking people. Furthermore, rest stops in Texas (and I would assume everywhere else) as only on major highways. If you are going somewhere that there is no major highway then you will not see a rest stop, and thus will not see a WiFi rest stop. I just can't see the practical use of this.

      And no, before you ask, I do not plan to 'ride my horse' to a rest stop and use my old laptop full of prarie grass and dust. I wear boots by choice and all the farm animals I have raised were by choice as well! Texas is more civilized than you would think!

    4. Re:can always get your /. by CreatureComfort · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The big practical use for this is to truckers. They are required by law to "rest" (read that as do anything other than drive a truck) for a certain number of hours each day, and this requirement has recently increased the number of hours. What the state is hoping to accomplish is that by giving truckers more amenities along the road they will be more willing to follow the regs and less likely to "push it".

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    5. Re:can always get your /. by kemapa · · Score: 1

      What the state is hoping to accomplish is that by giving truckers more amenities along the road they will be more willing to follow the regs and less likely to "push it".

      Sorry to go off topic but I hope the truckers do continue to push it! Not meaning that I wish they would drive without rest, but the Texas Trucking Lobby pushes HARD on the Texas state gov to raise speed limits and pushes hard on the local govs to give drivers 5 or 10 over the speed limit when pulled over. And I like to go fast.

    6. Re:can always get your /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I know of a rest stop in Burleson, TX, on I35W just south of Fort Worth. Hardly in the middle of nowhere. It's only a 20 minute drive for me, and I'm in town for most of that trip, so a lot of people would be closer than me.

  10. WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to admit, I'm becoming annoyed with WiFi. Not because I think there is anything wrong with it, but for the simple reason that if there is ANYTHING involving networks, out comes WiFi.

    Why is WiFi so great? And why is everyone working to provide free access to it? Free acces (as in beer) is great. But I just have one question. Why?

    Sure it's convenient and everything, but governments, businesses and individuals are all doing this. Providing free WiFi. Why? What payoff does everyone get?

    1. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by jennifer_l · · Score: 1, Insightful

      well it's all about the business model; free Wifi is a good buzzword which means better press, in real money you get more customers staying longer (you stay at the rest stop twice as long .'. spend twice as much) and most importantly have an edge over the competition especially for business customers. free as in beer still makes people money, and costs virtually nothing to run.

    2. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by cuzality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wi-fi is the next 'bathroom' -- every customer-service-oriented business will have to have it, even though you get nothing out of it, and in fact it costs you money, but if you don't have it you're not a 'complete' business.

    3. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      What payoff does everyone get?

      Maybe they get a better connected populous. Or businesses move into the area, or people who use WiFi are generally wealthier, so tax revenues go up without raising rates. If the entire city of Portland had free WiFi, I'd overlook the whole earthquake thing and move out there.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    4. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A better example would be air conditioning. When most people couldn't afford it for their homes, they would go to places that had A/C, like movie theatres. They used to advertise it. Broadband+WiFi will be similar, except that in addition to expense, you have expertise that people lack to implement a home WiFi solution.

      Personal Story: I have a laptop with WiFi and I went to the only Starbucks in town for some coffee. They didn't have WiFi there, so I went to Panera Bread Company to get a drink. The coffee was worse, but they had WiFi, so I stayed for three hours!

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    5. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by TheRealFixer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, except when nature calls I'm not running around looking for a hotspot.

    6. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In this case, I heard the point was to encourage motorist to take more time at rest stop to actually *rest*. Apparently too many of us Texans like driving for extended periods without taking enough breaks. So I guess its safety thing...

    7. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The coffee was worse, but they had WiFi, so I stayed for three hours!

      I see your point about wi-fi getting you to go there in the first place, but I would think that any shop selling coffee drinks might be more interested in getting you out as well as in. You may have hung out for three hours, but did you buy more than one thing during that time?

      It seems like the negatives could equal the benefits for the coffee shop. People come in but they hang out, taking up seating space and preventing new customers from coming in if they need a place to sit and drink their coffee. Unless, of course, the coffee shop is getting a percentange of the wireless access, but everyone apparently wants that for free.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    8. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1
      Providing free WiFi. Why? What payoff does everyone get?
      I think it would be very convenient to have WiFi at a rest stop, especially for those who are not from the area and travelling, can bring up MapQuest quite easily. And... (not sure if Texas has this by the NJ/NYC metro area does) they could log online to check latest traffic reports. I can't wait for the day until sensors are installed along all roads to monitor traffic conditions; it could be integrated into a MapQuest-like program to plot the most efficient route possible. Yay for Dijkstra's algorithm.
      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    9. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by llsouder · · Score: 0

      all you need is software that attaches/inserts banner ads into the users web streams and you have possible profit. 1. WiFi 2. Software that inserts banner ads 3. ????? 4. Profit

      --
      What
    10. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 1

      And... (not sure if Texas has this by the NJ/NYC metro area does) they could log online to check latest traffic reports.

      Well, if they're headed to Houston, they can. The Houston Real-Time Traffic Map now covers nearly every stretch of metro-Houston's highway system including toll-roads and HOV lanes, and provides information on accidents, etc. The map is auto-refreshed every 3 minutes.

      The system uses sensors placed on over-road to read the "easy-pass" toll road transponders that many people have and establishes average speeds for each stretch of road. My only gripe about the system is that, as of the last time the topic was discussed online, the system does not anonymize the data.

      Obviously the system has to have uniquely identifiable data points, but most people who have these toll tags aren't aware that the tags are also providing a record of their speeds to the transit authority that can be directly linked to their automobile. During the testing phase, I also seem to remember that they were using the system to determine where people were going to identify the most common routes. Like any tracking system, this could be used to figure out where to add bus services (or build commuter rail lines instead of our idiotic downtown light-rail system), but given the track record of most governmental agencies for using these types of systems, I doubt that will be the first use.

      Nobody's gotten a ticket from this (yet), but with so many major cities scrambling to find new sources of income to shore up their budgets, I wonder how long it will be before the police departments identify this as an easy source of revenue. All it will take is a few cameras to provide a positive ID of the driver along with the speed record from the system and bingo! Instant income for that new initiative that they couldn't get the voters to approve.

      As for wireless hotpoint in rest areas, I say it's a pretty cool idea. West Texas is especially hard to drive through - there are some places where you really do have to pay attention those "last gas for 200 miles" signs. Of course, that's offset by the fact that you can see the cops coming long before you're in radar range. ;-) If I can take a break and check my email on the way... cool.

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

    11. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I bought about $10 worth of food and drink, whereas I didn't buy anything at Starbucks. The smells make you hungry and you make an impulse buy. I know that some Starbucks have T-mobile providing the access, but I'd still go to Panera instead of that place because it's free, and pretty fast for 802.11b.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    12. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I commute on Texas highways, right past two rest areas. I'm hoping I can grab traffic and weather data at 70+ MPH. I timed it today. Given the range I get wardriving with a decent antenna, I should have about 10 seconds of connectivity without pulling in.

      While that's not likely to be enough time to go to a full website, I could configure my home machine to cache the images I want and provide them quick.

    13. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in the Boston/Cambridge area, the first cafes that got wifi access points reported that the extra business paid the monthly cost in 2 or 3 days. As more places got wifi, this time may have gone up, but not by that much.

      Most food places are full for only a few hours three times a day. They are nearly empty other times. An access point doesn't increase your business during the mealtimes, but it does increase business the rest of the day.

      For a similar situation, back when I was in grad school, many of the bars and restaurants near campus supplied some classroom material like black/white boards, projectors, etc. I had a number of classes that used part of the first session to decide where to meet for the rest of the term. The class would then meet at the eaterie, most of the students would order coffee and maybe pastry, and the owner's investment in classroom equipment was justified.

      It's an old story. An acronym like WIFI doesn't change it much.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    14. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by mwclark4453 · · Score: 1

      Texas posted why in their press release: "We think this will be a huge win-win for Texas' travelers," Keith said. "Knowing free Internet service is available at our rest areas will get drivers to make regular stops. Since fatigue is a factor in 1.5 percent of all crashes, anything we can do to get people to pull off the road and take a break is going to make our highways safer." An estimated 1,500 people die in fatigue-related crashes each year in the United States, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics. An additional 77,000 are injured. (Refer to first link in /. story that started this). Others posted what benefits business are getting from free WiFi.

    15. Re:WiFi WiFi WiFi *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open souce will be similar, except that it actually *saves* money. It will take longer to realize the savings, but many will just jump on the bandwagon first anyway. Ultimately, business won't care about open source, though. It will be a means to an end. How can we go about doing business as usual, but now using open-source?

  11. Pre-emptive Personal Telcos by philntc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long before telcos ship integrated devices that include DSL modem and wifi, all interoperable with VoIP networks?

    They could still make money on the DSL subscriptions and do and end-run around the grassroots personal telcos.

    1. Re:Pre-emptive Personal Telcos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2-wire modem from sbc/yahoo already does.

  12. viruses and mad cows? by aNonMooseCowherd · · Score: 0

    What happens if a cow downloads a virus via WiFi? Does it turn into a mad cow?

  13. I dig the cow Idea by H00T · · Score: 1

    Having worked large cattle operations in the past, moveable grazing areas would be a fantastic way to use this. Graze for a certain area for a set amount of time, move to a new area and mark off the area just grazed for a specified time to let it recover. Ahh the possibilites..... toddlers in McDonalds PlayGyms unable to leave.

    1. Re:I dig the cow Idea by PhillC · · Score: 1

      I used to work Dairys in Australia that graze the cattle in paddocks, rather than feedlots.

      Generally the paddocks are strip grazed to prevent the cattle getting bloated. If you just let your herd into a fresh new paddock of lucerne they would keep on eating, fill with gas (bloat) and if severe enough eventually die. Just what you do not want from your $2000 cow.

      So basically a portable electric fence is set up at a certain interval, allowing the cows to graze up to the fence. When the feed is exhausted, the fence is moved on another say 30 yards. In this way the cows feed intake is restricted.

      So the WiFi/GPS system sounds like it could work pretty well. I must admit that on first starting to read the article, and the bit about how the sound deterents were not working, I thought about somehow still using the electric fence and moving it robotically.

      So the fence is in position and instead of using insulated metal stakes in the ground at regular intervals, there were instead posts on wheels that we controlled by servers. Or indeed these posts could have their own WiFi receiver. The message is sent to the posts to move to a certain GPS co-ordinate.

      In this way the cows are still prevented from moving across the demarcation line by the traditional electric fence. The cows also aren't wearing any devices - and trust me dairy cows will work out a way to destroy anything you put on them. It is instead the fence itself that is controlled remotely.

      Infact, letting the imagination run a bit wilder, why not put webcams on top of each WiFi enabled fencpost, which are roughly 15-20 yards apart. In this way you could keep an eye on your herd (to check for things like bloat) without having to actually leave the house.

      --
      Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
  14. APs along the Interstate by moorg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some truck stops in Texas already have WiFi access (though not free) via a service for truckers.

    From my wardrive along the interstate it can be debated that there are enough hot spots already.

    All joking aside I can't wait for there to be legitimate free APs.

    1. Re:APs along the Interstate by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      But note the article is about rest stops, the government owned toilets on the side of the road every 100 or so miles. This is seperate from truck stops, which are far more common and a for profit company.

      That actually brings up a point. If there are enough truck stops, that provide far more service, why do we need our tax dollars paying for rest stops? The RFO (request for order) the TxDOT released indicates the govt won't be paying so I am not talking about the WiFi part.

  15. How Now Mad Cow? by supersmike · · Score: 0

    Maybe this explains where mad cow disease is coming from. The WiFi is driving them batty.

  16. wow by spamchang · · Score: 1

    i don't see a greatly pressing need for that...but wow i'm sure i would appreciate it (when i move back to texas that is). it's a great idea for a great state =P.

    the thing is, usually people in texas driving on highways are zooming along at 80+ mph anyway...not sure how many people would want to stop to check email or such. might as well get to your destination faster and do the internet stuff there.

  17. Kindergarten by Viceice · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Now children, who weould like to tell me what are the inportant things cows provide us with?"

    "Meat, Milk, and Internet!"

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:Kindergarten by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      You forgot Leather.

      Thus, cows are responsible for BDSM web sites.

  18. Texas, govt agency as an ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems that in Texas, truckers are the predominant users of roadside rest stops. Since a govt agency will be providing the Internet, you can bet your life that there will be plenty of surveillance involved, so I wonder if this will also be a fishing expedition for truckers who traffik in child pr0n? If you've ever travelled thru Texas on the interstate highways, you've undoubtedly noticed the many "adult" movie stores near lots of truckstops, and how many 18-wheelers are always filling their parking lots..... not to be making any insinuations about truckers being such big-time consumers of pr0n or nothing like that.

    1. Re:Texas, govt agency as an ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I wonder if this will also be a fishing expedition for truckers who traffik in child pr0n?"
      Yeah...'cause everyone knows that all this kiddieporn is being created for a statistically insignificant group of truckdrivers NOT, for instance, for a bunch of perverted, socially stunted, computer geeks.
    2. Re:Texas, govt agency as an ISP? by CaramelCod · · Score: 1

      If you bother to read the RFP, the third party will build and manage a paid service at the rest areas for laptops and a kiosk. Texzas won't be paying the company anything to install the network.

  19. Will this help? by thedillybar · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    "Knowing free Internet service is available at our rest areas will get drivers to make regular stops. Since fatigue is a factor in 1.5 percent of all crashes, anything we can do to get people to pull off the road and take a break is going to make our highways safer."

    Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of wireless Internet at every rest area.

    But what happens when truckers (and the rest of us) stay up surfing all night instead of sleeping?

    1. Re:Will this help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would that be an issue? Hell, they could stay up and do a million other things as well. Are we gonna put cameras in their trucks to monitor them?

  20. Why stop at wildlife? by laigle · · Score: 1

    We could put wifi repeaters in every car, put a solar powered unit (with a battery back, of course) on every street corner, build them into streetlights. Once they get small enough, every cellphone, pager, and PDA could be a repeater and the entire national voice network could go VOIP in a giant P2P network.

    Of course, then we have to find a way to pay for it all. But hey, people need wifi access at rest stops and such. I mean, what are you going to do if you're out of internet access range for a few hours?

    1. Re:Why stop at wildlife? by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      You know, people used to think the same thing back when the cell phone first came out. Most people thought it was completely unnecessary to have a phone with them wherever they went. Now look at it. Everybody and their friend has a cell phone. Hell, some people have two. And you can now get cell phone coverage just about anywhere you travel.

      My point is, the internet is a luxury that we've come to expect and rely on, way too much sometimes. Eventually it will work its way in to everything and people will just expect to have access to it whenever they want and wherever they want just like a phone. I think it's inevitable.

    2. Re:Why stop at wildlife? by thynk · · Score: 1

      Of course, then we have to find a way to pay for it all. But hey, people need wifi access at rest stops and such. I mean, what are you going to do if you're out of internet access range for a few hours?

      I think it's a great idea. This last week I was on a trip with my dad, not a single place we stayed (friends or family or hotel) had a connection to the net. I was betting on the fact that at least one of the places we stopped would have WiFi or a lan I could plug into since I don't have a dial up account.

      I guess what I'm saying that since my dad is older, and we stopped at nearly every rest stop along the route, having at least the option to check work email on the road would of been nice. Instead, I came back to 150 work emails, 200 spams and maybe 20 personal emails. I figure I'll have the mess sorted out by the end of the work week.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  21. Yesterday by Brie+and+gherkins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't connect to the internet wirelessly or wirely, and I had a good productive day.

    --
    If I promise to be a good boy can I have some better karma?
    1. Re:Yesterday by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And today, here you are wasting time posting a one-liner on slashdot. As the world turns...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. For those that bothered to RTFA by Dracolytch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any ideas on how to keep those zap-collars working for extended periods? I'd think that replacing/recharging all those batteries would almost be as much work as herding the darn things.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:For those that bothered to RTFA by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Maybe methane?

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  23. Fleecing of America.. by ltm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm sorry to all you tin-foil hat 802.11 receiving guys out there, but this is a huge waste of taxpayer money.

    I live in a state that has these grand taxpayer waysides, that, while being a wonderful place to take a dump, are a luxury for a state that has cronic budget deficits and are one of the highest taxed states in the nation.

    Adding wi-fi to the wayside crapatoriums will indeed benefit a few people looking for some highway p0rn, but again, it's a total luxury for a small population of folks who bring their laptops on the road. -- And no need to respond "hey, *I* bring my laptop on the road, so there must be others." Face it. It's a small population.

    Not to say I'm (completely) against taxpayer funded hot-spots .. but come on .. put 'em up where there's a steady population of users.

    1. Re:Fleecing of America.. by dykofone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm from Austin, and go to college in upstate New York. I drive back and forth about 3 times a year, which is about 30 hours on the road one way.

      8 of those hours involve just getting out of Texas, and any chance to stop and look at something other than the straight flat interstate around Dallas is definitely welcome.

      And you can't complain to much about the taxes, Texas being one of the few states without an income tax. Just enjoy one of the nation's best highway systems, paid for by oil-rich landowners. Trust me, once you have to start driving through Arkansas you're gonna be begging for any sort of technology.

    2. Re:Fleecing of America.. by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

      I agree about the waste of taxpayer money. This should really be done in commercial truck stops and gas stations. I live in one of those states who has cronic budget deficits and both parties are pretty quick to want to raise taxes with their spending. This sounds to me like another example of raise spending on "feel good" projects so we can raise taxes 'cause we're in debt, while feeding some of our pork projects. As a geek, I do love the idea of having more places to connect my laptop via wifi, but it's not blinding me of the fact that the state govenments will pay %4000 of what it should cost to install/run, and it's a %0 return on investment.

      --

      www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

      www.fairtax.org
    3. Re:Fleecing of America.. by peterdaly · · Score: 1

      You live in New York too?

    4. Re:Fleecing of America.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative
      ...this is a huge waste of taxpayer money.

      You need to go back and read the news release more carefully.

      TxDOT is taking bids for private companies to come in and install intenet kiosks in rest areas. These kiosks would charge users per time-unit to use them to access the internet.

      These private vendors are also required by TxDOT to provide free wireless coverage. The income from the use of the kiosk is expected to fund the wireless usage.

      The only expense to the taxpayer is whatever administrative time is required to run the bid and selection process. After that, it's all in the hands of private companies.

    5. Re:Fleecing of America.. by CaptainFrito · · Score: 1
      paid for by oil-rich landowners

      "The State is that great fiction by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else."

      -- Frederic Bastiat

    6. Re:Fleecing of America.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative
      I do love the idea of having more places to connect my laptop via wifi, but it's not blinding me of the fact that the state govenments will pay %4000 of what it should cost to install/run
      Ironically, you are blinded -- but by a knee-jerk response that erroneously assumes that anything free with government involvment must be government funded. Re-read the news release. The wireless APs will be run by private companies, not the state. The companies make money by charging for internet kiosk use, but a condition of being in the rest stop is that they provide free wireless. The net cost to Texas taxpayers once the system is in place? Zero.
    7. Re:Fleecing of America.. by zentinal · · Score: 1
      Perhaps your definition of "computer" is too narrow. Imagine a driver in the not-too-distant future whose car/truck/motorhome/whatever, wrist timekeeping device, pda, you name it, all are wi-fi capable. The vehicle connects and updates its map to route the driver around that accident 20km up the road. The pda connects and grabs updated calendar info relevent to the driver's destination.

      Oh wait, that's not in the future, that was yesterday! Tomorrow, they'll all be integrated into the vehicle. Standard equipment. Millions of vehicles.

      Wait, maybe that was yesterday also.

    8. Re:Fleecing of America.. by CaptainFrito · · Score: 1
      The only expense to the taxpayer is whatever administrative time is required to run the bid and selection process.

      Like any viable organism, a bureaucracy must learn to feed itself, and then continue to do so or die. Bureaucracies eat money, taking from the rich and giving to the poor, so as to always be assured of a majority support. Then they extract a wealth redistribution fee (trasnlation: get well paid for the effort). It's also why government jobs, even menial ones, pay so highly and employ a majority (I read somewhere that 60% or so of America's jobs are directly for the various branches of the US federal, state and local governments).

      If they did not do this, there would be no such thing as a government "career". Therefore, there MUST of necessity be costs to police the operator, care for the site, find a new operator if the old one is gotten rid of (or needs replacing), etc. Otherwise TxDOT paid jobs would become extinct.

    9. Re:Fleecing of America.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm not having a discussion with you until you take off the tinfoil hat and put down the liberatarian flash cards.

    10. Re:Fleecing of America.. by CaptainFrito · · Score: 1
      In other words, you won't have a discussion with me until I agree with you first...

      Nothing could have made my point better!

    11. Re:Fleecing of America.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 1
      No; you made an arugment that state-run services were governmental excess. When it was pointed out to you that the service was, in fact, to be privately run, you changed what we were discussing. Instead of talking about whether the government should be providing services, you twisted it into an anarcho-libertarian rant calling for the abolition of governement in general.

      It's a completely different topic, and not one that I've ever seen discussed in a reasonable manner.

      I don't engage in coversations with people who will change the entire premise of the conversation to hide their errors.

    12. Re:Fleecing of America.. by CaptainFrito · · Score: 1
      I absolutely did not change the premise of the conversation. Dykofone commented that it was a great idea because someone other than common folk pays for government largesse ('in Texas this stuff gets paid paid for by rich oil landowners'). I pointed out that one of the greatest economists of all time pointed out that wealth redistribution ("legal pluder" in his own words) was the essence of the State, and that its popular support is derived by sharing the booty with the masses (everbody loves something for nothing). I quoted Basiat: "The State is that great fiction by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else." And that's all I wrote. Never did I make an argument about State-run excess. You're just dead wrong.

      Then you made the comment, "The only expense to the taxpayer is whatever administrative time is required to run the bid and selection process." I responded by suggesting that this might be a tad naiive. This operator, no matter how private, will have to be contiually 'administered' and 'governed' to assure compliance. That requires funding; the State does not create wealth; it simply spends other people's money. That's just a fact; get over it. Transmogrifying it into some noble overture for the poor and downtroidden is simply fairytale fantasy that helps soothe the consciences of those that benefit from other people's money.

      After a full review of the posts leading to this one, it is quite clear that you have confused my posts with those of others. So the only errors being made here, and the only unreasonable attacks leveled here, are coming from you, madam.

      I suspect that you are a beneficiary of this or other Government plunder. It's pure "Robin Hood": taking from the rich oil landownwers, or the wireless company, or whomever, and giving the proceeds -- goods, services, cash, whatever -- to someone else. And, getting some administrative fees for themselves in the process. Making plain how the world works is neither an opinion nor a statement for or against; it is simply a statement of fact." You have brought what appears to be a metric tomn of baggage to this thread. Your socialist tone clearly suggests that you are a primary beneficiary of government largess. You're either a direct employee, or and indirect employee, feeding off the governmet teet: a lawyer, a teacher, a researcher, a think-tanker, a defense contractor, a road builder, lobbyist, sidewalk eyesore artist, [substitute your government funded program here], whatever. But you are out-of-balance with your own diatribe that you don't even know who you are responding to.

  24. Sure, why not by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's not such a bad idea. With public Wi-Fi, couldn't spammers or worm writers simply pitch tent and stay as long as they please? I'm no expert on wireless technologies, but free ublic services almost always gets abused by some and ruin it for all. If you had to but a little card from a vending machine to get some access code (again, very little knowledge of wireless) it might act as a deterrent. That money might actually go into some road maintenance or public works of sorts, yeah right...

  25. New Problems for RIAA by cfulmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So far, the RIAA's "sue the world" strategy has relied on subpoenas sent to ISPs to identify the filesharer who was using a specific IP address at a specific time. What happens when the ISP has no idea: "Well, it was somebody travelling on I-20."? If the ISP were a private entity, the RIAA _may_ be able to sue the ISP. But, what happens when the ISP is the State of Texas? My one semester of ConLaw says that the 11th Amendment would bar that suit.

    1. Re:New Problems for RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each ethernet card has a unique MAC id.

    2. Re:New Problems for RIAA by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Each ethernet card has a unique MAC id.

      which, with some models, can be changed.

    3. Re:New Problems for RIAA by Cee · · Score: 1

      So far, the RIAA's "sue the world" strategy has relied on subpoenas sent to ISPs to identify the filesharer who was using a specific IP address at a specific time. What happens when the ISP has no idea: "Well, it was somebody travelling on I-20."?

      Actually, that is a big problem. But I'm not thinking so much of filesharing. But it would quickly turn into a heaven for spammers, harassers and others who like to hide in the dark. I would guess that you have to sign some paper and login somehow to use the service, so that they can keep track of you. That's at least how my university does it when I want to use their WiFi network.

    4. Re:New Problems for RIAA by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Good luck tracking that MAC down.

    5. Re:New Problems for RIAA by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have not gone on this WiFi bandwagon yet as I do not own a laptop, but I think the thread of ubiquitous braodband connection everywhere is pretty exciting. However, I always wonder the impact it will have on net abuse. *I* know if I had to commit a crime or do something reprehensible online, I would take a laptop and park my car near an unsecure AP to do my deed.

      --
      :wq
  26. Roland Piquepaille is a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Submitter is a story spammer, know any different ?

  27. This is one benefit.. by unixbugs · · Score: 1

    I'll give you a free estimate on how much I will charge to wire your office.

    --
    You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
  28. XM? by kc0re · · Score: 1

    At some point can we just install a wireless access point on Satellites, akin to XM? So we can just go anywhere at anytime, and as long as we have a clear view of the sky or a relay point, we can check our hotmail?

    1. Re:XM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's called www.DirecWay.com - and it sucks.

    2. Re:XM? by fasteddie199 · · Score: 1

      The problem with Wi-Fi via satellite is propagation delay. XM is a receive-only technology so reception can be buffered. I'm sure you've seen the "live" correspondent from Baghdad who must wait to hear the end of the question before he can answer. A satellite internet connection could be fraught with similar delay and frustration.

  29. WGW vs GGW by cyb97 · · Score: 0

    I still believe that Girls Gone Wild is a better series than Wifi Gone Wild, no matter what the almighty slashdot say...

    1. Re:WGW vs GGW by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And rather than seeing Rutger Hauer in a crummy sci-fi movie where he's electronically linked to some woman, I'd suggest pretty good fantasy where he's linked to a woman by a curse. (You'd think, after a while, all that would be enough to drive him Batty and crush someone's head.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  30. Set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE! by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be GREAT, if they were to set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE.

    I'd love to be able to check and say "oh, I-35 is under construction from hither to yonder. Hm, what is my alternate route?" instead of the old "a mile past the last exit you see the ROAD CONSTRUCTION NEXT 50 MILES" sign.

    1. Re:Set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I just checked the site. It's under construction.

    2. Re:Set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Microsoft Streets and Trips has a system by which it downloads construction information. It usually works, too. Of course it doesn't necessarily know about every project but it certainly knows about most of them.

      I know it's a microsoft product but I just want to point out that there are systems that do this sort of thing. You have to pay for them, but that's life.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE! by eddy_tn · · Score: 1

      I-35 Road Conditions

      Check the website for a clickable state map, conditions by roadways, etc. It's done pretty nicely.

    4. Re:Set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE! by dbizzle · · Score: 1

      Georiga already has something similar to this. Construction, accidents, future changes. Pretty neat. http://www.georgia-navigator.com/

    5. Re:Set up a damn ROAD CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE! by David+Ishee · · Score: 1
      You mean like this?

      http://www.dot.state.tx.us/hcr/main.htm

      The detailed info is just text though.

      --
      Your password has expired, please login to change it.
  31. Terrible waste of money by Moblaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can understand how wonderful it would be to have these hotspots available for "free."

    However, taxpayer dollars are coerced from citizens for any government project. This one is a short-sighted waste of those dollars.

    If there is a compelling demand for this kind of service, then Texas should have stopped at a trial of 4 spots (if even that) and let private industry take over.

    The "1.5% of fatalities are caused by fatigue" argument is a red herring meant to justify this wasteful expenditure. I am sure the hundreds of thousands (million? two million?) of dollars spent on this "sexy" bureaucratic project could have been far better spent in other forms of more relevant traffic safety measures -- like carving those "wake-up" notches into road sides, or more money into re-inforcing messages not to drive drunk, or more money for training to reduce recidivism in previous DUI convicts.

    OR HOW ABOUT THIS? How about putting some stalls on the bathroom doors in the rest stops at El Paso? No joke... they had open stalls last time I was there a year ago. Aren't there are more basic steps along the road of highway culture than going from the outhouse straight to Wi-Fi?

    As it stands, this is a luxury expenditure that will let a small number of travelers with laptops get mail while otherwise subsidizing porn-surfing. Come on... if it's late at night and someone is tired, precisely how does an hour spent surfing web sites and expending ones mental resources in that kind of concentration improve one's alertness? It's an unsubstantiated bureaucracy-boosting statement that pushes the taxpayer just a few steps further down the road of permanent government debt, and ultimately, a form of bondage to pay back old expenses that should never have been incurred in the first place.

    Next time I drive through Texas, I'll drive friendly, I won't mess with Texas, and I'll surf the web for free. Three nice thoughts. But only two of them are good ideas. It would be nice for the Slashdot crowd of harder-than-average thinkers to look past our love of technology to identify bigger-picture issues before slapping on the seal of approval for this kind of government excess.

    1. Re:Terrible waste of money by moorg · · Score: 1

      like carving those "wake-up" notches into road sides, or more money into re-inforcing messages not to drive drunk, or more money for training to reduce recidivism in previous DUI convicts.

      What makes you think insufficient funds are being spent on these measures?

      OR HOW ABOUT THIS? How about putting some stalls on the bathroom doors in the rest stops at El Paso? No joke... they had open stalls last time I was there a year ago.
      El Pase, where the stalls are open and the tourists are afraid.
    2. Re:Terrible waste of money by chefmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative
      If there is a compelling demand for this kind of service, then Texas should have stopped at a trial of 4 spots (if even that) and let private industry take over.
      You mean, perhaps, like taking bids from private companies "able to provide free wireless Internet service and pay telephone-like Internet access at kiosks"? In other words, putting together a business case and selecting a private company to come in and run it, with no funding from the state? Perhaps you should RTFA.
    3. Re:Terrible waste of money by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      You haven't spent any amount of time traveling along a highway. I am not talking about that road trip you took in college to the next city that was four hours away. I'm talking about traveling for days.

      You need to stop, get out of the car and stretch your legs and do something else other than sit behind the wheel. When I traveled between NY and FL I would stop every couple of hours and sit on a park bench and read for 15 minutes before continuing on. Offering WiFi will be an additional incentive to get people to stop. As a Plus, the States with better rest stops usually pull in more tourists as well.

      Lastly, if you RTFA, TX DOT is contracting out the WIFI points as Net Kiosks. There will be a pay subscription for the kiosk or free WIFI. The idea being that the kiosk will be able to pay for the WIFI access.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:Terrible waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr, those bathroom stall doors are being removed by the state on purpose, to keep people from having sex in the stalls.

  32. Free Wifi with any "Toilet Sandwich"! by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    I can just see the vending machine at the urinal now. Condoms, Asprin, Egg Salad Sandwich, Wifi-B NIC extra sensitivity.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  33. Cool tall aerials allowed though! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to laugh when the rules state that the two aerials can't be higher than "200 hundred feet".

    I make that 20,000 feet or 3.78 miles!

    Makes it one tall aerial though. ;-)

  34. WIFI-enabled cows by o'reor · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can imagine this :
    redneck_geek@myfarm $ ping betty.myfarm.com

    PING betty (192.168.1.15): 56 data bytes
    Moooo from 192.168.1.15: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
    Moooo from 192.168.1.15: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    1. Re:WIFI-enabled cows by ibjhb · · Score: 1

      Ironically, you still wouldn't know where Betty is...

    2. Re:WIFI-enabled cows by o'reor · · Score: 1

      No. But at least I know she's still alive :-)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  35. Whats your favourite cow exploit? by blacksky · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the first time a hurd of wirelessly controlled cows get hacked. Imagine the fun you could have with a hurd of cows at your command.

    I think I'd have them follow the same person around all day. When he stopped walking, the cows would stop. When he went in a building, the cows would wait outside.

    Or just send them all to go and flash-mob the local butchers.

    1. Re:Whats your favourite cow exploit? by o'reor · · Score: 1

      Wait, you mean a Beowulf herd of those.... never mind.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:Whats your favourite cow exploit? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... At first, I wondered if they'd now outsource cowboys to India, then it occured to me that there might be a problem with that...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Whats your favourite cow exploit? by ExistentialFeline · · Score: 1

      Or just send them all to go and flash-mob the local butchers.
      Isn't that a flash-stampede?

    4. Re:Whats your favourite cow exploit? by kevmit · · Score: 1
      "I can't wait for the first time a hurd of wirelessly controlled cows get hacked. Imagine the fun you could have with a hurd of cows at your command."
      Sorry, but you'll simply HAVE to wait. Non-monolithic cows take decades to develop. -RMS
  36. Redneck Hackers by silconous · · Score: 2, Funny

    GR3A+ REdNECK hackEr5 W1+h L4ptOPS

  37. Cows with internet access? by EvilCowzGoMoo · · Score: 1

    I can see it now, cow tipping and war driving.

  38. Misleading title by ack154 · · Score: 1

    Here I am, reading the title, expecting some good spring break action or something... then I come to find out that it's about herds of cows and WiFi at rest stops...

    WTF? How disappointing... :(

  39. Wi-Fi Spotted Everywhere by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Informative

    We've been seeing Wi-Fi turn up just about everywhere, including truck stops, municipal buildings, our favorite stores, and so many more. You can check out your area or search for specific places in the US, as seen by wardrivers.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  40. visual stimulation? by ChiaBen · · Score: 1

    Cows are dumb animals. Nowhere near as smart as Dogs, in my observations. My dog has an invisible fence, and a shock collar with a remote. When she is doing something bad within the fenceline, I shock or audibly warn her with the remote, however immediately afterwards she is unsure which direction to move as there was not a previous boundary in that location, and no visible clues to show what is safe/unsafe.

    I would think that you would need a visual cue to reinforce the audible/physical fenceline...

    Just my $.02

    --
    "If voting could really change things, it would be illegal. " - Revolution Books, NY
  41. "Smokey and the Spammer" by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can just see the new action flick, "Smokey and the Spammer", with high speed chases from hot-spot to hot-spot as they detect viagra and cialis ads coming out of one rest area after another down I-10... culminating in a 30 car pile-up as the spammer tries to run the roadblock at the Louisiana border.

    Ah, they'll probably just block port 25 outgoing. Spoilsports.

  42. strange priorities by jacobito · · Score: 1

    Wifi is nice, but speaking as a frequent traveller on the Texas highway system, I'd much prefer clean floors, stall doors, and soap in the Texas rest stops first.

  43. Students = research animals by Halo1 · · Score: 1
    From the article about the cows:
    They have only tested the moving version on a group of students.

    "We have done this on a few research animals but it is not quite ready for prime-time," explains Butler. The technology appears to be working, but stimulus is not deterring the animals.

    I wonder what kind of stimulus they used.
    --
    Donate free food here
  44. Gosh... by MungoBBQ · · Score: 1

    They can get their wifi range to reach over so many miles, and I can't connect to my neighbors house 1000 feet away. Somebody ought to sit down and make cheaper, simpler solutions for extending wifi range. And no, I'm not talking about pringles cans or Chinese cookware here - we need simple-yet-working antennas that we can buy straight from a store. I don't have time to sit down and mess with a wireframe wok!

  45. This is NOT Tax Payer Funded by krgallagher · · Score: 3, Informative
    OK I downloaded the Request For Offer from TxDOT. This is not intended to be a taxpayer funded initiative. In fact here is an excerpt that says just that:

    "3. CONCEPT: TxDOT envisions a concept where wireless internet service is available for public use.
    3.1. The traveling public would be able to use a personal computing device, such as a laptop computer, equipped to acquire a wireless internet signal, to use the internet and send email during a break from the road.
    3.2. A separate kiosk, provided by the vendor, would allow those traveling without a personal computing device to utilize the internet service.
    3.3. This service will be provided at a cost to the consumer, not to TxDOT."

    TxDOT is expecting the "People not traveling with wireless equipment" to cover the cost of the project when they "connect to the Internet at kiosks for a reasonable fee to be collected by the vendor."

    Personally I think this is the fatal flaw in their plan. I doubt there will be enough kiosk users to cover the costs. Still I have to give them credit for trying.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  46. Brendan Barnicle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a character from Spongebob Squarepants.

  47. the funniest quote from the portland piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ""Right now we don't really have competition for Internet access," Sten says."

    This is the biggest load of BS I have ever read. First off comcast, verizon and qwest all offer broadband city wide...his little network covers about 5 city blocks. then there are about 200 dialup isps in the yellow pages. About a month ago Qwest lowered its prices by 10$ and Comcast, a few days later, upgraded all current and future subscribers faster down load speeds free of charge. If anything competition among Portand's internet providers is red hot.

    stendec@gmail.com

  48. Maybe I'm being too cynical but... by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't see a pay internet kiosk use at a rest stop being too profitable. AKA going the way of the payphone. Users who can't wait to get to their destination to check their e-mails will likely have their own laptops and would prefer to use the free wifi access. Leaving a small market for pay kiosk use (outside of initial novelty). I see the state funding these APs after the private company goes under. My feeling is that if the public likes it, and it's not profitable, the government will fund it sooner or later. If I'm wrong, then I've seen a late night advertisement for pay internet kiosks that will make you a fortune.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  49. WiFi overkill for cow collars by sakyamuni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would one need such a high-bandwidth link as WiFi for the cow herding application? Is this a case of buzzword intoxication? WiFi, WiFi, everywhere, and nary a mind to think [sorry].

    The cows aren't browsing the Web, for crying out loud. Tracking their location and various health monitors, sending the "zap" command, can be handled by something in the 300 baud capability range, using considerably less power than a wireless ethernet card -- you won't need to strap that large solar panel to the cow's back either.

    1. Re:WiFi overkill for cow collars by kevmit · · Score: 1
      "-- you won't need to strap that large solar panel to the cow's back either."
      My GOD! It's all so SIMPLE!

      1) Selectively breed cows with serious vitamin D deficiencies (so they love sunlight)

      2) Strap large solar panels to the cow's backs

      3) ??????????

      4) PROFIT!!!
      Eat mor chikin! -Elsie

  50. MOD UP by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    everyone seems to have missed this detail

    www.moviebums.com

  51. Wifi Cattle? Why not, ours are Bluetooth by tbradshaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in the Computing and Information Sciences department at Kansas State University we have a research project that is using some kind of sensor cluster implanted in cattle. These sensor clustors then take vital signs and other data and respond to researchers who scan the cow/bull with an IPaQ. Kind of like a tricorder, but with the sensors in the cattle instead of in the hand held device.

    I don't know too many of the specifics of the project (I'm a systems administrator in the department, rather than a research assistant), but it sounded cool to me. Maybe with some WiFi collars the cattle could make a mesh network and just shoot the data back to the ranch house without needing someone to walk by with an ipaq, heh heh.

  52. Oooh, I'm so scared! by switcha · · Score: 1
    From Willy Week: Behind the experiment lies a radical notion: that the Internet is as important to Portlanders as water, power or paved streets. ... "The Internet should work more like a public road and less like an expensive health club," says City Commissioner Erik Sten.(side note for non-Portlanders: This is the first half-intelligent thing Sten has ever said)

    Of course, in some quarters, them's fightin' words.

    "If they compete with us, they can expect a competitive response," says Don Williams, Comcast's Portland spokesman.

    Whatta ya gonna do, Don? Give away free cable?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  53. Cows by cshark · · Score: 1

    Cows wire to explode. That's funny. Moo00-BANG!

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  54. Not a problem. by jridley · · Score: 1

    The cows are coming in to the barn twice a day to get milked anyway. When the cow gets locked into the milking stall, the collar can notify the stall that it needs its battery changed out. I'd think the batteries would be modular, and would probably last at least a couple of weeks, so you'd need spare batteries and charging cradles for 1/14th the number of head in your herd.

    Since they can carry a lot of weight, the batteries may even last longer than that. If they last 30 days, well, all the head need to get a health check and innoculations/etc fairly often anyway, and if the batteries just clip in, this is an extra 10-second step.

    I can even see these collars having some RFID and LEDs on top of the collar to identify which head are due for health checks (LED lights) and a hand-held unit scans the collar and brings up the history. If (when) that happens, this becomes a great management tool.

    Look out if your boss tries to give you a present though:
    http://www.ucomics.com/thefifthwave/2004/ 05/02/

    1. Re:Not a problem. by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I don't know about elsewhere, but if they're out in a pasture the size of MA (Which they mentioned in the article), I don't think they're dairy cows. The checkup thing makes sense though.

      Of course, I could also see whole new avenues of theft (Device and livestock), pranks, and similar with toys like these.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    2. Re:Not a problem. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Very true, in the context of this article, we're probably talking about strictly beef cattle. But yes, they still need to be individually handled a few times a year anyway, so I'd guess they'd want the batteries to last at least as long as that interval.

  55. Portland - tax free wifi by tomwhore · · Score: 1

    If you get a chance to read the WillyWeek piece on what we are up to in Portland OR you will notice that what has actualy BEEN DONE, not planned or figured out but really and truly in the field working, has been done by the Personal Telco Project for the grand tax payer burden of $0

    Donations, sweat labor, dedicated folks doing the labor, home and biz owners dontating up space, bandwidth being given....

    So of course the thing to do for City Agencies is to see something that is working and come up with a way to make this cost tax payers $$$ and for them to make the usual graft, oldboyisms, backroom dealing and intrabiz payoffs.

    Yea, thats Agency think for ya..

    Meanwhile back in the world of things actualyworking the PTP is putting up more nodes all the time.

    Networks require Net Work....so get working.

    -tomwsmf

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
  56. Theifs, criminals, and otherwise baddies... by KevetS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you need that quick cash all you need to do is hang around the rest areas in Texas and wait for someone to pull in and break out their laptop. A simple mugging should be all it takes to be on your way to at least $500 at the pawn shop!

    --
    This is my United States of whatever.
    1. Re:Theifs, criminals, and otherwise baddies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because this is obviously where all the cops are going to hang out now instead of at Starbucks.

  57. Live Streaming Video Texas Manhole Rest Area Porn by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1

    Seriously? How much longer before we see Live porn feeds from Texas rest areas?

    LOL

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
  58. Wi-Fi in Rural Areas by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

    When our department recommended this idea to TXDOT, we were recommending that it be tested in rural areas of Texas along Hwy 287. The test areas didn't even have cell phone access, so Wi-Fi was very helpful for people trying to find hotels, restaurants, or other resources in the area. After a lot of feedback from people using the wireless access, TXDOT wants to put it all over the state. Of course, they don't want to pay for it. So, they're letting ISPs submit contracts. It'll be interesting to see if it stays a free resource, or if the ISPs make it a pay-per-use setup.

  59. Best comment on the WiFi fences... by markana · · Score: 1

    From The Register (http://www.theregister.com/2004/06/08/wifi_enable d_cattle):
    The team has already carried out a test of a static version of the fence system, with 10 'volunteer' cows and a square kilometre field. The moving fences have so far only been tested in a group of students. (We reckon this could be a whole new market).
    "Open Campus" indeed...

  60. WiFi rest stop in West Texas by Wonko42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Some friends and I just finished a two week, 7,400 mile road trip around the US. We spent two days driving across Texas from east to west. Imagine my amazement when, after driving down I-10 for hours and hours through the desolate, dry, tumbleweed-infested desert of West Texas, I walked into a rest stop in the middle of nowhere and found myself looking at myself on an LCD screen.

    After doing a double-take, I realized there was a webcam mounted on the top of the LCD. Behind the live webcam window, there was a fullscreen display of the rest stop's power usage statistics. Apparently, this place was powered entirely by a single wind turbine (which I had noticed outside). They were displaying all kinds of fun graphs and historical data on power generation and usage and whatnot. The poster describing the system claimed they were using WiFi to transmit the data from the turbine to the computer inside.

    We were pressed for time, so I didn't whip out my laptop and check to see if the access point was open, but still, I was pretty amazed. We circled the entire country, and of all the rest stops we visited, that little stop sitting all by itself in the middle of the desert was probably the nicest one.

  61. Cows? by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    Seems like a lot of hardware for one cow, not that I would mind having one of thoes but an all in one unit will be needed to make this a marketable idea.

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  62. Cows on-line by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
    There is a company here producing many devices for the farmers and specifically their cows. One of the devices detect when a cow is about to deliver and using a WiFi AP forward the alert to the farmer who no longer need to sleep in the barn when a cow is about to deliver.

    I believe this is the real Freshmeat.net.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  63. Not quite by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    OK, so, where is the information about alternate routes?

    Also, what happens as I leave TX and enter OK - now I have to search for another sie maintained by another entity for the information I need.

    That's the issue I have with the current crop of road information online - there's lots of data, but little information (data in a usable form), and precious little knowledge (data in a usable form + how it relates to other information).

    There's not a "I-35 is under construction from just south of Purcell, OK to Gainsville, TX. For traffic from OKC to San Antonio, suggest I-44 through Wichita Falls" - just a list of short segments of I-35, with county references that don't help as much if you aren't local.

    And if you ARE local, then you already KNOW the condition of the roads.

  64. Is CACI (a sponsor) the same as those being sued ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed (http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20040 610-9999-1b10titan.html, http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0610-02.ht m, http://www.nylawyer.com/news/04/06/061004i.html, & http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3793663.stm ) that a "CACI International" is being sued under RICO for Al Ghraib prisoner abuse. Does anyone know if this is the same outfit as the CACI listed as a sponsor (http://www.wifi-shootout.com/) to the WiFi Shootout 04 (CACI: Ever Vigilant)?

  65. Not free for people that need it most. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let me get this straight:

    If you can afford a laptop you get free wi-fi.
    If you can't you have to pay for kiosk use and subsidize the people using wi-fi?

  66. maybe OT, but even my LIBRARY has free WiFi now by microcars · · Score: 1
    Evanston Public Library Free WiFi, no strings attached, they have a pamphlet in the lobby about how to use it.

    No WEP, nothing. BYOL

    I always war-drive when travelling, but that can get tiring and also impractical on the Interstate, so I'll stop at a Flyin' J's Truck Stop with WiFi over some other place.

    I like the previous comments about "WiFi is the next bathroom".

    --
    I like microcars