Slashdot Mirror


Less is More: Thunderbird 0.7 Review

comforteagle writes "In part two of our look at Mozilla's less is more approach to thunderbird and firebird, Gareth Russell has finished the examination with a look at the newly released Thunderbird 0.7. Part one dealt with firefox and was discussed here on slashdot as well."

227 comments

  1. Had to go back to 0.6 by AGTiny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had to go back to 0.6 because of several crippling bugs. 0.7 stopped checking for mail in many of my IMAP folders so I went a whole day thinking I had no mail. :( It also has an annoying habit of not displaying the message body in random messages forcing you to go out to SquirrelMail to view them. 0.6 works perfectly for me though!

    1. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you report those bugs?

    2. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had this problem with multiple POP3 mailboxes, in 0.5 and Mozilla 1,7rc2 and 1.8a1. Mozilla 1.6 seems to work fine. It seems that shutting down the mail window and restarting the app solves the problem with Mozilla 1.8a1, but I believe Thunderbird 0.5 just couldn't read one of the new messages in one of the mboxes, and that was that. Really strange, it'd read the rest.

      No, I have not yet reported this, as I don't have a clue how to reproduce it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I had a similar problem with Firefox 0.9...

      I installed it on a new Windows XP box I am setting up (I hate XP... if you have to deal with Windows... Win2k is a lot easier to deal with.)

      It installed OK, but crashed every time I tried to run it. (In fairness to Firefox, XP is probably to blame -- see comment above.)

      Anyway, I uninstalled 0.9, and installed 0.8 in its place, and everything seems to work ok now.

      I am VERY GLAD that there are articles like THIS to direct the PHBs to, whenever any of them second guess the decision to move everyone off of Internet Explorer, Outlook, and Outlook Express.

    4. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Radix37 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me too... after I moved the old installation to a backup directory and went to install 0.7 to a new directory, I noticed the installer wouldn't even let you create a new folder! I had to make one myself and then pick that in the installer. After it installed, it locked up on starting. I couldn't even ctrl+alt+delete it to kill it, and it was using 100% cpu, and had to hard reset to kill it so I could uninstall it.

      --
      Speed Demos Archive - Lots of speed runs!
    5. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Networkink*Man · · Score: 1

      Damn, me too.

      I only tried to install a few extensions (getall, engimail)

      Extensions must not jive w/ .7 yet.

      I'm glad moving the .6 folder back into place was a painless solution from .7 not even starting at all.

      --
      "How am I supposed to remember you, when you won't let me forget?" --Bare Naked Ladies
    6. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 4, Informative
      Use the .zip instead of the installer for Firefox 0.9

      I had problems with the installer version, mostly unstable and slow and none of the extensions would install. And I was doing a clean install so no issue of migrating from 0.8 or anything.

      Anyway long story short, after tring install/uninstall (delete profile folder) for about 2 hours, I just got the zip and unzipped in C:\, and it works like charm. All my favourite extensions are back on.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    7. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Weh · · Score: 1

      Well don't know about stability but I won't install 0.9 until I can use the tabbrowser extensions with it. They should incorporate those things into the standard distribution.

    8. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tab browser extensions is compatible, if you get the latest version from the author's site. Link for the lazy

    9. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      0.9 has serious extension issues, i.e. I try to install two and it hangs forever on startup, won't actually install them and then proceeds to not start at all.
      Needless to say, I'm rolling back until 1.0 is well established.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    10. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

      It has been reported already, although I don't have the bugzilla # nearby. I had the same problem. Strangely, 0.5 did work, but 0.6 didn't. Installed 0.5 on my laptop and upgraded to 0.7 and it worked. Installed 0.7 over my 0.5 install on my desktop and it still hangs. Head-scratchingly aggrevating.

      Shawn

    11. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Swift(void) · · Score: 1

      Really? I installed my 5 favourite ones all at once and never had that problem.

    12. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      (Replying instead of modding...hit this wall before and HTH)

      0.6, IMO, pales in comparison to .4 and .5 when it comes to stability.

      I leave my work machine on all the time to filter mail, so sync support was awesome, but .6 just seemed to go into la-la land after 2 days, where .5 would be fine for 2+ weeks w/o incident.

      Oh, and a bit of info for those having problems with missing messages and "upgrade blues" or general wierdness:
      in your profile, find and move/delete all the .msf files (index files of mailbox stores), next snyc or folder click it will regenerate them.
      (happend to me twice going from .3 to .5)

      Another bit of info for the person asking about sig's in email: make a text file, and tools -> options, click on account, and check the "attach this sig box", and, naturally, attach the text file.
      While you are there, if you have several different accounts, go to smtp at the bottom and add different email servers you use, and attach them to the appropriate account...lest you get the dreaded "Relaying denied" gripe messages.

      Tbird .7 just rocks, fast, sync support...and my boss, the EX-Outbreak Express user just loves the way Tb *ASKS* what app to open attachments with.

      She told me that was the best thing for her, as she gets tif, shp, ppt, and various other office and gis formats and OE just drove her nuts taking that control away.

      No more OE...YAY!!

      Oh, but one outlook user...grrr.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    13. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I tried Thunderbird last night, o.k. for an e-mail client, and certainly more secure Lookout Virus Express (I know, it's lame to re-name like that, but I just de-loused a computer becasue OE crap).
      Problem is they got a LONG ways to go on Usenet support. Especially for the binaries groups. No combine and decode for one. A big one I ran into is trying to save an attachment, you download a usenet post with a cool pic attached, the whole thing downloads and you decide to save the pic so you click and do save image, and it RE-DOWNLOADS the damn thing. Add that to the fact that it doesn't give good feedback most of the time and I wound up downloading one message three times! All for a stupid pic of the andromeda ascendant (trying to model it as a learning excerise in 3dsmax).
      I also couldn't find a way to select a group of messages to download for offline reading, I could flag a bunch of messages, but the flag does nothing as far as I can tell execept put an icon next to the messages.
      Now if that is a bug in the latest re-lease that is not present in the previous someone please tell me so I can try that, I hate OE, and thunderbird looks alot like what I'm looking for, but broken usenet kills it for me since there is NO broadband, not even sat, too many high hills with metal bearing ore in the way can't get a signal strong enough, where I live.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    14. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderbird 0.6 might be like that power of Netscape 4.05 back in 1992 and 1993 when men where men who used Netscape, and the sheep at Microsoft were scared to release IE 4.0... ;) Not all MS folks ate their own dog food, but believed that Microsoft would succeed, but not in quality, but quantity..

  2. What about the lawsuit? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought Ford Motor Co. was making them change the name to "ThunderFox."

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:What about the lawsuit? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I thought Ford Motor Co. was making them change the name to "ThunderFox."

      Works for me. A fox getting hammered would make a pretty cool icon.

      KFG

    2. Re:What about the lawsuit? by archen · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, if they make a separate callendar, chat client, etc. I'm getting this bad vision of some sort of Voltron episode where Firefox, Thunderbird, Snowcat, and Crazyweasel all merge to become the Ultra-Netasour: Mozilla.

    3. Re:What about the lawsuit? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      +1, Referenced Voltron instead of the ripoff "Power Rangers" Well done.

    4. Re:What about the lawsuit? by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      You know, if they make a separate callendar, chat client, etc. I'm getting this bad vision of some sort of Voltron episode where Firefox, Thunderbird, Snowcat, and Crazyweasel all merge to become the Ultra-Netasour: Mozilla.

      i kinda wish they'd do that, to be honest. the ONLY reason i ever use full Mozilla anymore is because of composer. if composer was a seperate product, i would have had my students using firefox as their main browser instead of mozilla, and i wouldn't have to have 2 browsers on my desktop just to get a comfortable GUI HTML editor.

      besides, voltron was cool! i had the metal toy! w00t!

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    5. Re:What about the lawsuit? by dosius · · Score: 1

      Power Rangers was based on Kyoryusentai Zyuranger, not (at least directly) Voltron.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    6. Re:What about the lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Emacs isn't a good enough GUI HTML editor? Are you mad?!?!? The Open Source movement shuns you!

    7. Re:What about the lawsuit? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      That has been fixed already.

    8. Re:What about the lawsuit? by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      i'm glad to know that...may try it out. fortunately, im not teaching anymore (w00t!), but i still reccommend progs to freinds/family/former students

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    9. Re:What about the lawsuit? by zulux · · Score: 1

      Snowcat,

      I kind you not...

      The stand-along callendar: Sunbird

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    10. Re:What about the lawsuit? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I've been informed that Nvu is actually made by the same guy(s) that made Composer. Even though it's being hosted by Lindows instead of Mozilla, it's really just a new version of Composer (more or less).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:What about the lawsuit? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Edsel Bird? ;)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  3. I already had a crash by ka55ad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love the new version - the interface seems 'clearner almost'. Also I like the extensions option in the menu that will bring up a page full of extensions that you can download. I did have one crash with it though. I had 2 windows open, and mulitple tabs in each window. All of a sudden it just puked on me .... oh well - it still kicks ass.

    1. Re:I already had a crash by ka55ad · · Score: 1

      Whoops - I am a moron. With all of the name changes lately I was thinking of Firefox, not Thunderbird. Sorry about my idiocy.

    2. Re:I already had a crash by twbecker · · Score: 1

      Multiple tabs? Uhh, we're talking about Thunderbird dude, not Firefox.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
  4. someone has to say this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thunderbirds are go?

    1. Re:someone has to say this.. by y0bhgu0d · · Score: 1

      there's gonna be a movie! wooo!

    2. Re:someone has to say this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the credits dialog.

  5. It's clearly a little bit unpolished by fresh27 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just look at the background image in the extensions menu ;)

    --
    http://ipod.fresh27.net/
  6. Few teething problems, but good overall by XeRXeS-TCN · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using both Firefox (since 0.7) and Thunderbird (since 0.4) for a while now, and I've recently upgraded. I seem to have hit a bit of a bug with having too many FireFox extensions installed, but beyond that slight problem, FireFox and Thunderbird seem to be going from strength to strength these days.

    Anyone who is still on OE or IE should seriously consider a switch, because they include things which you should really have by default in your software. Firefox has tabbed browsing and integrated popup blocking, and Thunderbird has built in encryption, supports PGP extensions, and has integrated "smart" spam filtering.

    What more could you ask?

    1. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 1

      I could ask that I be able to provide a username and password to my ldap server so I could get my company directory. But no.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    2. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyone who is still on OE or IE should seriously consider a switch, because they include things which you should really have by default in your software. Firefox has tabbed browsing and integrated popup blocking, and Thunderbird has built in encryption, supports PGP extensions, and has integrated "smart" spam filtering.

      For those who still want to stick with an IE based browser, might I suggest Slimbrowser? Its based on IE, but has many of the features that the "geekier" browsers like Firefox and Thunderbird have, and getting more all the time. I've been using it for quite some time, and enjoy it muchly.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    3. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those extensions might not be 0.9 compatible. Seems that quite a few things changed between 0.7 and 0.9. I noticed that when I downloaded the new one that there was a warning somewhere about some older extensions.

      That said, I'd love a couple of more features in Firefox, namely the Forms tool from Mozilla, and the ability to default cookies to a set maximum lifetime. (Forms tool is probably an extension, just haven't found it yet) I'd also love to be able to block cookies from entire subnets (probably haven't read the appropriate part in the manual about how to set this) such as *.doubleclick.net, and *.hitbox.com. Being able to do this upon the resulting "Prompt to accept cookies" dialog would be very cool and user friendly.

      Those would be enough on Firefox. Thunderbird, the list is very very long on additional features. However, I'd like the current features to work more smoothly, and some interface improvements would be nice (have just downloaded 0.7, so I haven't delved into it yet, but I strongly suspect the UI friendly things I want won't be in there)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by mobilebuddha · · Score: 1

      Or try crazybrowser, I find Crazy Browser to be a lot faster than slimbrowser. I've enjoyed enough that almost all of my clients and their associates now have crazybrowser as the default browser (mainly for tabbed browsing)

    5. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      No way man, MyIE2 is the best IE-based web browser.

    6. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

      "What more could you ask?"

      If you use Opera for a bit, you'll find lots of neat little UI additions that would suit FireFox well. In particular, the notes tab. That's pretty slick. I can highlight your post, right click, and say "copy to note". Then, in the notes tab, I'll see the first sentence of your post. If I single click it, the entire section I copy/pasted will appear. If I double click it, it'll show me the page it came from. I've been using that for cell phone hunting. It's a LOT easier than trying to come up with good names bookmarks.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by The+Salamander · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would ask for a VIM plugin for message editing.

    8. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hu? It does ask you, its just not in available in the config but if a password is required it will prompt you for one, and remember it if you choose too.

    9. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Vargasan · · Score: 1

      Wow, from what you describe Notes sounds perfect for Thunderbird. Except Thunderbird is an EMAIL CLIENT!

      Opera has an e-mail client, it's unfortunate that it's so garbage, though.

      --
      Putting the romance back into necromancer.
    10. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by MooCows · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd also love to be able to block cookies from entire subnets (probably haven't read the appropriate part in the manual about how to set this) such as *.doubleclick.net, and *.hitbox.com


      Just download Adblock from the Firefox update site

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    11. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by MooCows · · Score: 1

      Cookies .. I knew I shouldn't have skipped reading lessons :/

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    12. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looked at the screenshot. doesn't look slim to me.

    13. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1

      Try CookieCuller from update.mozilla.org

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    14. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Except Thunderbird is an EMAIL CLIENT!"

      Yep, you're right, I got a little confused there. Sorry about that. Interesting note, though, the notes feature works in Opera's mail tab as well. So if a particular email is important to me, I can copy to note and have a nice little bookmark for it. Slick.

      "Opera has an e-mail client, it's unfortunate that it's so garbage, though."

      Opera's mail client is pretty crappy, no argument there. I did find a good use for what it does do, though. I created a seperate mail account for my forums messages (I.e. Slashdot, or CGTalk, or anywhere else I visit...) and I set Opera's mail to get the messages from that account. I then used Opera's filters system to seperate Slashdot from CGTalk from everything else I use, and I can see at a glance what types of messages I have.

      Why is this better than say using Outlook's rules filters or something? Simple: There is only one copy of the message. The problem with using rules is that sometimes emails fall into more than one category. I only need to delete it once instead of in every instance of it. Also, since Opera's mail operates in a tab, all of Opera's features (like notes or 'open in background') work.

      I wish I could remember why I didn't like Opera's mail for casual conversations etc. I had a good reason for it, but I can't for the life of me remember what it was. Guess I should try it again and find out.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      I prefer AvantBrowser when IE is necessary.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    16. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 1

      Well, it's certainly possible I just don't know how to set it up, but my directory requires a username and a password, and the dialog only allows you to enter a password.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    17. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by admdrew · · Score: 1
      Avant Browser is another good "IE-based browser" that includes tabbed browsing and popup blocking. I've been pretty happy with it. Also, memory usage is generally pretty good compared to IE. I'll have upwards of 15 windows open in Avant, using an average of 2 or 3 mb of memory per window. On the other hand, leave Avant running (with or without any actual browsing windows open) for a day or two, and it's not uncommon to see 150 - 200 mb of virtual memory and 50 - 75 mb of physical memory being used. Heh.

      I use FireFox just as much, though. I do a fair bit of cross-browser testing, and sometimes it's just refreshing to use an all around good product like FireFox.

    18. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Shaleh · · Score: 1

      specify it as part of the query. For instance, Active Directory users bind as login@domain.

    19. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is an extension called "QuickNotes" for thunderbird and firefox. Configured properly, it crosses over.

    20. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 1

      Those plugin browsers are really uncool. IMNSHO, as a web developer of sorts, when somebody mentions CruftyBrowser, ShadyBrowser, or whatever other IE type extensions as a substitute for Mozilla and friends is what it would be like hearing someone bragging to his friends that he can borrow your truck and return it with no gas, after doing so.

      Besides, isn't it just a little curious that not one of these freeware IE extension programs have any source code out there?

      You have the same security problems (and potential additional security risks by the extension itself, ala the Googlebar hack), same lack of standards compliance, you're still chalking up hits for Internet Explorer (yes, the user agent stays the same if you use these), and depending on which one you use, about as much screen cruft as IE and Mosaic combined ;)

      Show some compassion, and some support for the coming of true 5th generation internet. Friends don't let friends drive on the information superhighway with MSHTML in their system.

    21. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I'd like it in the browser, too. For editing textareas.
      Wiki anyone?

    22. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      One thing I'd really like - to be able to open more than one email in a window at once. On Windows, with TB 0.6 and 0.7, I seem to be allowed exactly one and only one email window to be open to display an email in.

      Is it just me? Have I missed an option somewhere?

      Seems like an odd and irritating limitation to me...

    23. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by greydmiyu · · Score: 1

      Hell, does KMail have that, yet? KDE's applications are far closer than most others since it implements editor-part and there is a port of vim as an editor-part.

      --
      -- Grey d'Miyu, not just another pretty color.
    24. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Not shure about e-mail. But I made the mistake of selecting a whole conversation thread on usenet and hit return. I GUARANTEE you lots and lots of new windows that way (like at least 47)!
      I was trying to find a way to download all the messages so I could read them offline. It tried all right. It tried to open 47 connections at once to my usenet server, which only allows 4 per ip addy. So I got 47 windows and 43 error messages. Funny now, frustrating then.
      Haven't had that much netbarf since the last time I accidently hit one of those gazillion pop-up sites in IE (which I now do not use, Tbird .8 right now, will try .9 soon).

      Mycroft

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  7. I went a whole day thinking I had no mail. by dark-br · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh *that* would be a dream! ;)

  8. What standards does it support? by acomj · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I been looking through the online mozilla.org trying to determine if it supports css 1.0 or 2.0 or xhtml. I can't find a listing of what the browser supports or is trying to support.
    Does it still support png? (I'd assume yes).

    WHere is this information or do I have to search throught Geko to find it.

    1. Re:What standards does it support? by mios · · Score: 1

      Use the force ... read the Gecko source.

    2. Re:What standards does it support? by Micro$oft+$uck$ · · Score: 1

      Yes, it supports png. It supports css 1.0,2.0, and xhtml. Yes, it r00lz. If firefox doesn't support it, you don't need it or it doesn't exist. Or, it's MSHTML.

    3. Re:What standards does it support? by respite · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am quite sure it supports all of those. Here is a page that talks about printing css2 and css1. Here is a fun little png demo.

    4. Re:What standards does it support? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      If firefox doesn't support it, you don't need it or it doesn't exist. Or, it's MSHTML.

      What is this MSHTML you speak of?

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    5. Re:What standards does it support? by admdrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      When it comes to standards, IE tends to be a bit more relaxed than other browsers (read: Mozilla and FireFox). You can do things like add properties to <tr> tags (something that standardized HTML doesn't support, I *think*). While in most cases this is pretty innocuous, it has the potential to allow developers to create code that is only useable on IE browsers.

      For a little example, try opening www.microsoft.com in both IE and FireFox. Notice the cool rollever menus on the left that are displayed "correctly" in IE but not in FireFox? It's not a browser shortcoming, it's just that IE is able to display code that doesn't necessarily conform to a standard.

    6. Re:What standards does it support? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's not a browser shortcoming, it's just that IE is able to display code that doesn't necessarily conform to a standard.

      You misspelled "willing."

    7. Re:What standards does it support? by nzAnon · · Score: 1

      Quick look turned up this:
      http://www.mozilla.org/start/1.0/guide/prod uct.htm l#standards
      so i guess you can say 1.6 supports at least the above.
      For the real story of course, check out something like: http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers/mozilla.html
      a nd these pages:
      http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_core.htm l
      http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_css.html
      htt p://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_events.html
      http:/ /www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_html.html

    8. Re:What standards does it support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this article is about thunderbird *NOT* firefox

    9. Re:What standards does it support? by Micro$oft+$uck$ · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's version of HTML. It makes a mockery of W3C standards.

    10. Re:What standards does it support? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      Ha, actually, I was just playing off of your "or it doesn't exist" comment. =)

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
  9. Multiple IMAP by ajakk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was trying to get a setup going with T-bird under Windows checking multiple IMAP servers at once and it was having a very hard time doing it. I could never get it work well at all. Does anyone know if the newer versions of T-bird have fixed that problem?

    1. Re:Multiple IMAP by otisg · · Score: 3, Informative

      It works well for me.
      What is more, and this may be good to point out to other Thunderbird users, this release finally fixed a bug with accessing IMAP over SSL. Before, Thunderbird would start to hang after a few (e.g. 10-ish) minutes of inactivity, and the only solution would be to quit and re-start. This version fixed that issued.

      Another issue (with all previous releases - I used them all) was with saving outgoing mail to the 'Sent' folder. It worked only half the time or less. This version sends email faster and always saves to Sent folder successfully.

      To those using 0.6 or older, suggestion - upgrade.

      --
      Simpy
    2. Re:Multiple IMAP by Blacklantern · · Score: 1

      There is an extention availible here for that. http://texturizer.net/thunderbird/extensions/#geta ll One thing to note: while testing this I could not download from both accounts until I let the password manager store my passwords.

      --


      "There is only a one in six billion chance that you actually exist"
    3. Re:Multiple IMAP by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1

      I have several IMAP servers connected. E-mail me if you want me to try to help (in my profile).

    4. Re:Multiple IMAP by julesh · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird would start to hang after a few (e.g. 10-ish) minutes of inactivity, and the only solution would be to quit and re-start

      One thing that bugs me about both TBird and mozilla's mail client is that there is no way of forcing a disconnect/reconnect to an IMAP server, so if your server hangs, the mail client stops being able to get mail. Very annoying.

  10. Extensions by vgaphil · · Score: 1

    Firefox 0.9 blew up all of my extensions (and my calendar!), I'm not going to rush to get Thunderbird 0.7 .....

    --
    A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
    1. Re:Extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join the club, that really pissed me off.

    2. Re:Extensions by fresh27 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Show Old Extensions 0.1.3 makes old extensions visible and usable in Firefox 0.9. I've only tried two old extensions using this, but they've both worked.

      --
      http://ipod.fresh27.net/
    3. Re:Extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find the extensions use a completely different thing in version 0.9 than to 0.8.. just like almost every other version requires new themes and extensions.
      Thunderbird is a different application to Firefox, thats like saying I'm not going to play Quake 3 because Quake 1 didnt have many levels.

      Now.. IE and OE break everything no matter what friggin version.
      So go blow a donkey you fucking dumbass

    4. Re:Extensions by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      It's been posted for a while now (at least since .8 was released) that Firefox .9 and Thunderbird .7 would require a new API for extensions and themes.

      Most extensions for Firefox have been updated (check update.mozilla.org)

    5. Re:Extensions by thetoastman · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are extension issues in Firefox. I don't know about Thunderbird because I haven't started using it yet.

      I was emailing one of the extension writers the other day about not being able to install his extention on my Linux platform, but it installed perfectly on my Windows/2000 platform.

      In part, his response was that the locale portion of the extension manager may need to be tweaked.

      To get around this, he recommended installing in a new profile. What I did was to back up my profile, completely delete the .mozilla directory, and then start up Firefox. I then imported my bookmarks, copied back in all my passwords, and set up my extensions.

      Everything went smoothly.

      For Mozex, you have to hack in the extension since the extension manager API has changed. Other than that, the new releases are great!

      In short, when in doubt talk to the developers (nice thing about open source software), haul out your tools, and fix it yourself.

      Then publish a brief how-to so that others can avoid the grief.

      If people are interested, I'll write up the Mozex hack.

    6. Re:Extensions by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      If you use nightlies, pay attention when installing stuff from update.mozilla.org. There is a bug that will allow you to try and install an extension even if the extensions says it doesn't support your version.

      This is important because nightlies off the Aviary branch (where 0.9 came from) now have their version set as 0.9.0+ instead of 0.9.0. Even though there is little different at this point between the 0.9 release and the current Aviary nightlies, some extensions will refuse to work and will be stuck telling you "this extension will be installed the next time Firefox is restarted". Not a big deal as you can just uninstall the extension, but annoying nonetheless.

      This should be a temporary thing though, as I'm sure extension authors will quickly modify their extensions to say they support 0.9.0+ instead of just 0.9.0.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  11. getting real slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It took a long time to load, so here is a mirror:

    by Gareth Russell

    Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 is the new lightweight email and newsgroup client from the Mozilla Foundation; it's a new take on the email client and has been built almost from the ground up, with the proven Gecko rendering engine. As with Mozilla Firefox its main aim is to try and satisfy the average user's requirements, with a minimum amount of fuss. Email clients over the years have tended to suffer from "feature creep" and "bloat", Thunderbird removes the clutter such as Intstant Messaging integration which you may never use. Thunderbird has all of the basic features you'd expect to find in any email client, with IMAP and Pop3 support, email filters and the ability to manage multiple accounts. Thunderbird also contains many other non-standard features such as built in junk mail filtering, S/MIME, digital signing, message encryption, spell checking and a flexible user interface. On top of this, Thunderbird is possibly the most extendible browser available with its excellent extension system, allowing you to create an email client that suits you.

    Thunderbird 0.7's changes, include: a smaller download size for Windows, speed improvements in Windows, Linux and Mac OS X, new themes and extensions managers, as well as a talkback program for the unlikely event that Thunderbird crashes. A number of bugs have been squashed for the release, helping to iron out any rough edges which existed in the previous editions. The most important change in 0.7 is the overhaul of the extension system with new extensions controls allowing for easier management of extensions and which, now make it possible to update your extensions to the latest versions without having to go and manually download them.

    The Interface
    As with Firefox, Mozilla Thunderbird features a stripped down interface, which is more thought out than previous editions of Mozilla Messenger. The default graphical interface features a three-pane setup much like Microsoft Outlook Express or the original Mozilla Messenger. On top of this; however, Thunderbird provides three other default settings including an interesting three pane vertical arrangement, which manages to use more of the display area to display your emails than the standard setting. Most importantly though, Thunderbird does not try to restrain you by its interface and its easy to customise the layout by adding new buttons to the toolbars or to add new window panes for content to get it exactly how you want it.

    Junk Mail
    One of the most attractive features of Thunderbird is the advanced Junk Mail filters included my default in Mozilla Thunderbird. The Junk Mail is adaptive by using a system of Bayesian filtering, this learns what is junk mail and what is not by you indicating to Thunderbird whether it is or is not junk. Junk can be defined by simply checking a junk mail icon next to the subject of the email. When a similar email appears in your inbox, Thunderbird will indicate that it believes the message is junk with the option to correct it if it is wrong. It's surprising how short a period of time it takes, before Thunderbird catches all of your junk mail with no mistakes. It only took a couple of days, before my inbox was junk mail free, with only a couple of false positives. Thunderbird can also be told to move the junk immediately to a temporary folder or to delete it straight off. This really sets it apart from programs such as Outlook Express which don't have built in junk mail controls, as you'll no longer to be forced to wade through a load of junk mail just to read you emails. No more time wasted moving all those offensive pornography emails which you receive to your work email address, no more time wasted deleting those university diploma emails and in particular no more being caught out by those emails with the viruses attached. Thunderbird really is revolutionary as an email client, when it comes to dealing with junk mail.

    Security
    Thunderbird includes S/MINE email support, which is a

  12. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ThunderCougarFalconBird...

    The futuristic (no pun intended) car inlaid with the beaks of 1000 eagles!

    1. Re:One word by kpansky · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent +1 Futurama

      --

      --Kevin
  13. Might want to rethink by kensai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    the name Thunderbird so people don't confuse it with this 70s show?

    1. Re:Might want to rethink by kensai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Modded as offtopic. Clue to moderators, it was suppose to be a joke. What's with the Slashdot moderators these days?

    2. Re:Might want to rethink by stinkyfingers · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      What's with the Slashdot moderators these days?

      Irritable bowels? Bloated? Water retention? Fat ankles (otherwise known as cankles or chunkles)?

      Could be anything.

      Oh, read this quick, it's sure to be modded down.

    3. Re:Might want to rethink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clue to commenter - it wasn't even close to being even a little bit funny, so it comes across as a pointless comment about something unrelated.

      If you're going to make a joke, make it something funny that most people will want to read.

    4. Re:Might want to rethink by kfg · · Score: 1

      Maybe I just run with a different crowd, but this is what it makes me think of:

      Thunderbird

      KFG

    5. Re:Might want to rethink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because that joke has been made a thousand times. Oh no, Pheonix is a city! Oh no, Firefox is another program. Oh no, Thunderbird is a car, a jet team, a TV show, a probably a million other things. Should we just name our programs JFGIUHGOJNVI 0.7 just so nothing will ever be the same?

    6. Re:Might want to rethink by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

      Or the car... Or the Indian Bird... Wait MS needs to rethink WORD... you don't want people to think it is an actual word! Or Frontpage... your not buying a index.htm page. Oh man Photoshop... you get a whole 1 hour photo store!!!!! No wonder it costs so much. Sid Miers Pirates...

      And a live action T-birds movie will be out this summer... Directed By Number 1 aka Johnathan Frakes

      --


      ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    7. Re:Might want to rethink by Disevidence · · Score: 1

      And a extremely shitty joke, at that. Offtopic is synonymous with "-1 not funny"

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  14. Won't start. by sporty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I downloaded it twice on two different days for the Mac. It mounts the dmg file fine, but won't launch. In the console for OSX, you see complaints about the executable being corrupt or truncated, then just dies out. Happens on two seperate machines too. Nightly builds don't do it either :\

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:Won't start. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I had this problem previously on Windows when trying to install a more recent version. The solution was to reinstall the old version, uninstall any old themes, reinstall the newer version, and it worked. If you have an older version installed with older themes you might give this a try.

    2. Re:Won't start. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had this problem previously on Windows when trying to install a more recent version. The solution was to reinstall the old version, uninstall any old themes, reinstall the newer version, and it worked. If you have an older version installed with older themes you might give this a try.

      When you install it they specifically tell you not to install it over any older version, if people would just read the text in front of their faces, they wouldn't have such problems.

      Since themes and extension formats are still changing, it's obvious that installing over existing installs is going to cause problems. When it hits 1.0, I'll expect it to seamlessly upgrade, but until then things are going to be changing between builts.

    3. Re:Won't start. by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      I installed it yesterday on a Mac OS X 10.3.4 with no problem. Copied the app off the mounted dmg and then double clicked it, and there it was. Played with it for about 30 seconds before returning to Eudora which kicks its ass as far as I'm concerned. I love the mozilla browsers; use Camino constantly, but for email Eudora is where it's at.

  15. well by no-arg+constructor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is all good and i certainly use firefox at home, but while there will be many posts praising tabbed browsing, extensions, etc, sadly, i think we'll be preaching to the choir more than anything else. most p eople who even know firefox exists probably have tried it and like it, the other 95% will still be on ie. maybe i'm pessimistic, but i just don't see a massive migration happening just through word of mouth.

    1. Re:well by nonword · · Score: 1

      At the risk of falling back on cliche, all we've got is word of mouth. I'm not convinced any single source browser will ever hit the mainstream, but I'm pretty sure that *if* one does, props will be given to 'word of mouth'. Get your parents, friends, and girlfriends on it. They'll trust you before they'll trust some cheesy MSN ad. (Here's to hoping, anyway..)

    2. Re:well by Cowboy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      I converted four people to Firefox this month. Seems to eliminate their problem to call me every week to clean out the spyware.

  16. One wish.. by boomgopher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is that the stupid address autocollect feature would lowercase everything before checking if the cotact exists.

    I'm tired of having multiple:

    Fred.Mertz@Lucy.Com
    Fred.Mertz@lucy.com
    fred.mertz@lucy.com
    etc...

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  17. Please think before astroturfing by jfengel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you're going to promote your own site on slashdot, please spend a few bucks to get some real bandwidth first.

    The slashdot effect actually pretty funny when it's some guy's personal site getting unexpectedly whomped, like "American's Funniest Home Videos" for nerds.

    But if you're going to do it to yourself, you just look stupid. Especially when you're "osdir", and you're supposed to know something about operating systems. Why precisely should I care about your opinion of Thunderbird when you can't even keep your own site operational against a slashdot effect that you knew was coming?

  18. Extensions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It looks like the new versions of Firefox and Thunderbird have an extension manager that makes them incompatible with some of the older extensions. So if you use a lot of extensions, make sure they are available for the new versions before switching.

  19. The only problem I have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    is that the icon on Mac OS X looks like an envelope with a bad toupe. If that is supposed to be a bird, please make it look like a bird and not a very bad comb over.

    1. Re:The only problem I have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah that's the best laugh i've had here all day :)

    2. Re:The only problem I have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Hicks is the guy who designed the toupet, and think it's quite good. thunderbird icon design

  20. Works Great by zeoslap · · Score: 1

    I have two IMAP accounts running and it works great

  21. how about sperating out composer and adding to it by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    separate out compose and add much needed functionality so that it can do everything frontpage can do.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  22. Re:One wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, I'm Fred Mertz, please stop emailing me. You've already killed lucy.com, and charliebrown.com is mad, there isnt anyone there to pull the football out from infront of the webserver. Thank you.

    Fred.mertz@lucy.com

  23. Can we hide local folders yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is there an option to hide local folders yet? I would reccommend Thunderbird to unsophisticated users except that I don't want to explain what these are for (which is nothing for most users - most email users use pop, not imap).

    1. Re:Can we hide local folders yet? by croddy · · Score: 1

      i use imap ... i'm not an unsophisticated user ... and i still have no idea what the local folders are useful for.

    2. Re:Can we hide local folders yet? by Sunspire · · Score: 1

      This actually got me curious, in what sort of situation could the local folders be used? I can't really think of any... I have a mix of multiple IMAP and POP accounts in Thunderbird and I've never felt the need to try out the local folders. In fact they just take up space in the left pane that I'd rather see my long list of newsgroups use.

      I'm guessing you have to manually drag and drop messages there from your actual accounts, but who would actually bother doing that? Or, perhaps in Linux a local MTA can deliver mail to the user's home directory and use these folders, but then why would we be seeing these in Windows too?

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    3. Re:Can we hide local folders yet? by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      I don't use them either, but is this really a problem for folks? I mean, click the [-] and they shrink up to a visually unobtrusive single screen line. And it's not like they're taking up space, they're at the bottom of the pane.

      As for having to explain it, I say "This is a place you can make folders that apply to all your email accounts, if you have more than one. Most folks don't use it."

      Takes a couple of seconds, and I've never had anyone not get it. Parents, friends, kids, they all got it right away.

  24. Re:One wish.. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny
    fred.mertz@lucy.com?

    I imagine Ricky is getting more fed up with it than you are. Someone has some 'splaining to do.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  25. I am very concerned by Tarantolato · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...about the official Mozilla project's continued split focus between Firefox/Thunderbird and the full Seamonkey suite, which is now apparently going to continue even after the standalones reach 1.0.

    Mozilla's crucial mistake early on was deciding it needed to be a platform. If this had just meant developing a cross-platform gui and tools, or just developing a whole application suite, it might not have been a problem. But they decided to do both. It cost them, and it continues to cost them.

    IBM's Eclipse project is a good example of how to do a platform. Start small with one app: in Eclipse's case, an IDE. Then build the rest of the stuff around the skeleton: IBM's new Workplace package is basically built from Eclipse plugins.

    But continuing to devote resources to Seamonkey is just a bad idea. Not only is it a distraction from making the small, focused apps better; but keeping around Mozilla as an Emacs-style do-everything suite does IMHO damage to the brand name. I for one have nothing but bad memories of Netscape, because of the ungodly bloat of Communicator. Any project that continues to officially perpetuate that mistake loses respect in my mind, and I would guess in many others' as well.

    1. Re:I am very concerned by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mozilla's crucial mistake early on was deciding it needed to be a platform. If this had just meant developing a cross-platform gui and tools, or just developing a whole application suite, it might not have been a problem. But they decided to do both. It cost them, and it continues to cost them.

      That mozilla IS a platform is the very reason that development on firefox and thunderbird went this fast. Firefox and thunderbird share all of their backend code with the full suite. Only the actual UI is not shared. That kind of freedom allows quickly creating entirely new applications on top of the mozilla framework. It also means that development on the backend benefits all mozilla project apps.

      I'd like you to show quotes from an actual mozilla developer (and not one who quit before mozilla really got going, like jwz) who agrees with your point of view. Creating the platform is what saved the mozilla project.

      Besides, the only way to compete effectively with microsoft is to offer an alternative vision to developers. The platform is key in that. Mozilla, without becoming a platform, would be like opera: forever irrelevant.

      But continuing to devote resources to Seamonkey is just a bad idea. Not only is it a distraction from making the small, focused apps better; but keeping around Mozilla as an Emacs-style do-everything suite does IMHO damage to the brand name.

      The seamonkey suite is not a distraction, because like I explained, most of the code is shared among all the mozilla projects. The only thing the suite has for itself is the UI, and that is only getting maintenance development. It's really not true that firefox and thunderbird compete for developer resources with the app suite.

      Now, I will agree that it does some damage to the brand to have so many products. But on the other hand, the suite still has a lot of users who find things of use in there they don't find in the separate apps. Cutting them off would not be nice, and would make corporate users less likely to ever use a mozilla product again.

    2. Re:I am very concerned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like you to show quotes from an actual mozilla developer who agrees with your point of view.

      You mean the guys who scammed 4 years of paychecks out of AOL while not delivering a product?

      OK, that might be a little cynical, but anyone who disagreed with the "platform strategy" probably wouldn't have been working on Netscape/Mozilla in the first place.

  26. Re:One wish.. by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh and, before anyone fusses, I've grabbed source and looked into making the change myself, but frankly I couldn't even figure out how to even build the darn thing.
    The build is not exactly staightforward, IMO.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  27. On linux its true by Charvak · · Score: 1

    They have similar functionality

  28. Re:One wish.. by mirthworks · · Score: 1

    man, this guy's inbox will be filled three times faster :)

    --
    n/a.
  29. Re:how about sperating out composer and adding to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    > much needed functionality so that it can do everything frontpage can do.

    <span id="main">
    <blockquote>
    <blockquote>
    <div>Make< /div>&nbsp;<div>up</div>&nbsp;<div>your</div>&nbsp ;
    <div>mind.</div>&nbsp;<div>Do</div>&nbsp;<div>y ou</div>&nbsp;
    <div>want</div>&nbsp;<div>function ality</div>&nbsp;
    <div>or</div>&nbsp;
    <div>Front page</div>&nbsp;<div>compatibilty?</div>&nbsp;
    </ blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    </span>

  30. You should have expected that. by jared_hanson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, it's written all over the Firefox and Thunderbird pages that these are prerelease versions (in case the 0.* version numbers didn't clue you in). You shouldn't expect them to keep your data clean on upgrades.

    Part of the development process is settling in on a format you want to use to store data in, and this format changes regularly in the approach to a 1.0 release. It would be far too much effort for them to support formats that they don't consider to be final. After 1.0 hits they will have to maintain compatiblity.

    Long story short, if you are looking for something to handle your data well, use an already stable app. Then, if you want Mozilla apps, switch to them once they release 1.0.

    It's your fault you lost data, not theirs.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:You should have expected that. by frankthechicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's your fault you lost data, not theirs.

      Which isn't the greatest attitude when you are trying to get some loving for an alternative browser by non-techies.

      I had managed to convice a fair few people to switch from IE to Firefox 0.8, and they were enjoying it, and were prepared to put up with not being able to go to some of their favorite sites (yes, even with the pretend to be IE extension). But when the latest version of Firefox hit, and they decided to install it, the fact that it removed their bookmarks(for some), removed their extensions, and ruined their themes(which for some was the biggest hurt, they just prefered the eye candy more than anything), more or less made them revert back to IE.

      Unfortunately many of them also have the google toolbar for IE, which means the usual pop-up killing advantage of Firefox is now mute, and so the reasons for convincing them to go back are outweighed by the frustrations they have just encountered.

      I can only hope the joy of tabs will bring them back.

    2. Re:You should have expected that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are 0. release versions. If you convinced people to switch from a stable browser to one that is not release final, then its you're own bloody fault. You told them lies and I'm not surprised their upset.

      Sheesh. Get a clue huh. Its not the Mozilla foundations fault you don't heed their warnings.

  31. I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was cleaning some malware off someones computer and I informed them most of the stuff they get is because of vulnerabilities in IE (they swear they never click Yes). So I installed firefox for them and told them some pages might not work in firefox because IE is so popular. That explanation was fine for them and i'm sure they'll tell some non-techie friends about firefox. While word of mouth isn't the fastest way to deciminate information it is the most compeling. Whats going to make you use a product more, a recommendation from a friend or some advertisement or post on a message board? Although Firefox won't stop all malware if IE is synanamous with spyware, adware & popups and Firefox is portrayed as the safe alternative, tabbeb browsing & fancy extensions aside firefox will slowly gain huge ground.

    1. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...deciminate...

      Dude, at least try to spell it properly. It's 'disseminate.'

  32. Try NVU by WD · · Score: 3, Informative

    NVU is a stand-alone composer, based on Mozilla.

    1. Re:Try NVU by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      except that it is not as cross platform as Firebird and Thunder bird. I am using OS X, I would like a client for OS X.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Try NVU by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      That and it appears to be hosted on a 56k modem. At least that's what I gather from the excruciating download speed I got...

    3. Re:Try NVU by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least one person has built nvu for OS X successfully, but reported that it was a bit buggy... so I imagine eventually there will be OS X builds on the site.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:Try NVU by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I've made a torrent.

  33. Thanks for mirroring, AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for being the first "mirror-er" I've seen to post AC. I know they have to have been others that have gone the AC route, but the preponderence of karma ho's drives me freakin crazy.

  34. Less is Less by aflat362 · · Score: 1
    Not Less is More.

    Less is Less, More is More.

    Provide more features, but make them easy to use, with useful defaulted options. Sukka.

    --

    Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    1. Re:Less is Less by virid · · Score: 1

      Unless we're talking about Unix pagers...

      --
      "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
    2. Re:Less is Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Less is More" is one the standard cliches that the media uses to show you that there is, ummm, someone actually there. It's cute and all.

  35. It still has the problem ... by altp · · Score: 1

    It still has the problem where it complains, with a popup dialog box, that a folder cannot contain mail when you click on a folder than cannot contain mail.

    This is all well and good, but when you have it set to check all your folders for mail and this message pops up several hundred times every 5 minutes it gets very old, very fast.

    They need a way to toggle this warning on and off.

  36. Calling International Rescue! by HBPiper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thunderbird 1 was always my favorite. Official Site

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  37. Re:how about sperating out composer and adding to by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    One man's +1, Funny is another man's -1, GRR_Thanks_For_Reminding_Me.

    I reinstalled FrontPage once and lost all my 'Personalized Menus'. I about had a panic attack when I couldn't find the 'remove formatting' button. Thank you, Microsoft!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  38. YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now :( by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now if only YahooPOPs could update their project to be compatible with Yahoo Mail I would be using Thunderbird again.

    I just recently rebuilt my g/f's computer, removing IE, MSN, etc, and installing OO.o, Firefox, and the like. (Thank you the open cd ) She liked how fast her computer was now that the spyware was gone, but she could NOT stand how Firefox rendered the fonts on the Yahoo Mail page "incorrectly" (dear God! What will I do now!). Thankfully I ran across this nifty little project on source forge called Yahoo Pops which acts as a SMTP/POP3 server on localhost and bridges the gap between your favoriate email client and the Yahoo Webmail service. That evening I VNC'd into her computer, installed YahooPOPs and Thunderbird 0.6 and hooked her up with a cute theme with a rotating penguin in the top right (She's all about some Tux racer). I showed her how to use it and she loved it. No more ads, no more waiting for the web pages to load, spell checking, the whole 9!

    But just when I thought I had sold her on the wonderfullness that is Open Source (I'm on my way to getting her to suse) Yahoo decided they are going to try to compete with G-Mail and offer 100MB to their free customers, as well as a few other minor "improvements". To make a long story short the upgrade broke YahooPOPs and thus Thunderbird. We were both very disapointed.

    Now she found a way to open IE by typing "iexplore" on the run line and is using Yahoo Mail again. Its going to be hard to get her to try open source again, but for some reason she cant keep off Tux Racer. (PS: Go neverball!).

    Any advice on ways to keep her using Thunderbird? Its really a great product and if my company wasnt tied religiously to MS Outbreak I would be putting it on every desktop in the place.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  39. names.... by trainedCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    dont you mean thunderfox and firewhale?

  40. Thunderbird Wishlist by JBMcB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Integration with GnuPG and/or PGP. Yes I know of engimail, I think it's essential enough it should be built-in.

    2. Integration with Jabber. IM + Email would be cool. I like how Windows Messenger does this, but with Thunderbird it would actually be secure :)

    3. Better LDAP integration. Current LDAP implementation is kludgy, I wish they would make it smoother.

    4. Fix the calendar app. It's nice, but could be a whole lot nicer. The original Netscape calendar app wasn't bad, I much prefer it over Outlook.

    5. Import/Export filters. There are third party filters already, it would be nice if they were built in. Import .mbox, maildirs, Outlook PST, Outlook Express directories, Eudora, MacOS Mail.app, etc...

    6. How about a text mode interface for uberhackers? It could be really lightweight, just ctrl- to go back and forth, ctrl-r to reply, etc...

    That's it. It shouldn't add too much bloat, the basic Jabber protocol is small and GnuPG integration should be cake. Any other ideas?

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by PsychoSid · · Score: 1

      Regarding number 5

      These would not be cross platform. .pst input for example requires a DLL. Thats why Evolution etc. cannot access the data.

    2. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1. Integration with GnuPG and/or PGP. Yes I know of engimail, I think it's essential enough it should be built-in.

      2. Integration with Jabber. IM + Email would be cool. I like how Windows Messenger does this, but with Thunderbird it would actually be secure :)
      I don't think either of those is that great an idea. The point of T-Bird is supposed to be about a slim program. GPG/PGP isn't used by the majority of people, so I sure don't think they need to put it in the main program. Doesn't having an easily accesible extention take care of the needs of people who want that? And people use several different IM applications, so I don't think they should be integrating any into an email program. A calendar I can see putting in to let this compete with Outlook in the email/calendar app space in businesses.

      You are reverting back to where we came from --> "I think besides email, it should be able to browse newsgroups. oh yeah, and an integrated IRC chat client...and maybe an HTML composer."
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    3. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      "6. How about a text mode interface for uberhackers? It could be really lightweight, just ctrl- to go back and forth, ctrl-r to reply, etc..." Wouldn't it be better to use/create a separate program if you want a text-mode interface. AFAIK, file format compatability with TB wouldn't be a problem. If you want lightweight you don't want a program with the bloat of a GUI interface that you don't use. And anyway, don't uberhackers use CLI email already?

    4. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ture, but it would still be useful; IIRC, Firefox's IE import code (imports passwords, etc) is Windows-only because it calls IE for it. Still pretty darn useful... And you're less likely to hit them if you only ever run non-Windows. If you're switching, exporting before the switch might be useful.

    5. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by jeddak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fix what calendar? Thunderbird doesn't have a calendar to fix....

    6. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix the calendar app

      I wish I could find out if it's nice or not. It crashed the first time I ran it and tried to enter an appointment, and has never run again, simply crashes immediately.

      I expect shit like this from Microsoft...

    7. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd love to use Thunderbird instead of OE (for NG reading mainly, email is rather trivial for me), but a few things keep holding me back. Mainly, it's the whole message-threading model of TB that bothers me. Maybe I'm just use to Outlook Express, but I *really* like the ability to collapse sub-threads. If I'm reading an interesting NG topic, but this one sub-thread starts going *way* off-topic, in OE I can just click on the little collapse button that's on every message with children. With TB, only the top-most message has a collapse button, so I just have to scroll past the potentially hundreds of message until I get out of the sub-thread and back on topic.

      Also, if I have "Hide read messages" or "Only show unread messages" enabled, OE will at least wait for a refresh/reload to hide those messages I've already read. In TB, if I read a message, collapse the thread, then try to get back to that message.. it's too late. I'd have to change my view to all messages to see it again. Agaion, just a little PitA for the way I read.

      It's the little things like that that keep me on OE. I've never had any of these *rampant* viruses or trojan problems that everyone bashes it for. And there's probably little hope in getting TB fixed, as it's more of a personal preference than a true bug, so *shrug*. OTOH, I *AM* a rabid Firebird fanboy. I love this damn browser like I've loved no other piece of software not written by me. *hugs his monitor*

    8. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by chuonthis · · Score: 1

      6. How about a text mode interface for uberhackers? It could be really lightweight, just ctrl- to go back and forth, ctrl-r to reply, etc...

      If it's keyboard shortcuts you're after, look at this list of Thunderbird keyboard shortcuts.

    9. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by pilkul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But everyone should be using GPG. It's a scandal that we have strong, fast encrytion available today, but nobody is using it because none of the email client makers are bothering to properly integrate it in their clients. The average user doesn't know how easy it is to read his mail, and will often email passwords and such in plaintext. It's up to the developers to make the transition; due to widespread ignorance of the risks, there will never be user demand.

    10. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Yes, T-Bird is supposed to be a slim program, but how much overhead would it be to include GPG/PGP integration? Not very much, I would think, and like all other "options" it could be disabled by default. I'd definately use GPG/PGP more if it came ready to use, OOB, and that's the big problem with getting people to adopt it. Making encryption seamless and transparent to the end user is what it's going to take to get users to use it regularly, and Thunderbird could certainly be the testbed to do it.

      However, I'm almost willing to bet Apple will get it done (and done right) before anyone in the Linux/Mozilla (because not everyone who uses Moz uses Linux, right?) gets a clue.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    11. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by mibus · · Score: 1

      Jabber + Thunderbird? Someone's working on it!

      From the Jabberzilla homepage:

      This project has the goal to integrate Jabber instant messaging into the Mozilla Thunderbird mail client.

    12. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to agree. While I can understand the desire for a slimer program, and thus no support for irc/usenet/im/etc., good encryption in email is a chicken-egg problem of the easy-to-fix sort. It's not there by default because no one uses it much because it's not there by default.

      Mycroft

      p.s. no usenet would be o.k. having usenet would be really o.k. having broken usenet just sucks (but hey it is a 0.x release so I'm hopefull).

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    13. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by kbahey · · Score: 1

      5. Import/Export filters. There are third party filters already, it would be nice if they were built in. Import .mbox, maildirs, Outlook PST, Outlook Express directories, Eudora, MacOS Mail.app, etc...

      Actually, it already does some of that. I switched from Outlook Express to Thunderbird 0.6 a few days ago, and it automatically imported all of my email, and stored in mbox format. It was flawless. The only comment I have is that they use CRLF as the line delimited, not just LF. But, being the Windows version, that is understandable.

  41. Just moved from Mozilla 1.6; will have to revert by toccoa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello, my name is Toccoa and I am a tab-aholoic. I greatly prefer the way groups of tabs are done in Mozilla; or at least based upon my current understanding of 0.9.

    E.g. with a group of tabs on the tab bar
    Mozilla: click on tab, all tabs open & start loading
    Firefox: you get dropdown; for maximum hassle, the choice I want(Open in tabs) is always at bottom. Nor have I found way to set "add tabs" versus "replace tabs" preference.

    If Mozilla did not exist, I would use Firefox. But for now, tabs mean I prefer Mozilla.

  42. Re:YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now by generic-man · · Score: 1

    For $20 a year, Yahoo! Mail will let you use POP access from Yahoo! itself. Programs like YahooPOPs are essentially screen scrapers. The slightest change to page layout will break your software completely.

    I know it runs contrary to everything the Open Source movement stands for, but it might be worth paying real money for a real service.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  43. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1, Flamebait? More like +5, Insightful.

  44. Re:YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

    According to this forum message that was just a temporary problem while they were upgrading, and it should now work again with YahooPOPs.

  45. OMFG by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got vomity butterflies from laughing so hard.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  46. Re:One wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I know it's really not worth mentioning, but I'm feeling like pointing out someone's fault today -- I think he was referring to the "I Love Lucy Show" with the reference to "Fred.Mertz@Lucy.com" as Fred was one of Lucy's close friend's in the show, as opposed to Lucy who is Charlie Brown's friend.

    I apologize for posting this, but I couldn't help myself.

  47. Why are you here, then? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're clearly better than us, what with your preachy signature and your goldplated nickname.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  48. Re:YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My only objection to paying for yahoo pop access is that they gave it to us for free for so long. It's like drug dealers, first try's for free. Once you're hooked on it, we're changing the plan and making you pay. Sorry, yahoo. I'll just use another service.

  49. Re:Just moved from Mozilla 1.6; will have to rever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try middle clicking :)

    about:config probably has the replace/add tabs preference ... there is also a whole big firefox extension you can download that gives much more complex tabbed browsing functionality

  50. Just this week... by ScoLgo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...I switched everyone at my work over to TBird from Outlook2k. Everyone likes it much better than Outlook. They all especially like the speed of mail download (something was going on with Outlook where it would sometimes take up to an hour to download mail from the POP server - especially on a Monday where the mail had stacked up all weekend). Very annoying when you're trying to get your day going. TBird grabs it all in a minute or two.

    One thing everyone especially likes is the multiple mail account handling. Having separate folders for each account is very cool and makes organizing messages very intuitive. The only thing we're missing is Outlooks ability to insert multiple 'signatures'. Anyone know if this is currently possible in TBird? Having blocks of pre-typed text ready to go at the click of your mouse is a real time-saver. One kludge we came up with is to keep a message in the Drafts folder that contains the needed text but that's a rather clumsy solution.

    We are a small company so this changeover is pretty insignificant in the overall scheme of things but... it's a start. With the warm reception TBird received from my users at work (they really were getting sick of Outlook), I figure they'll go install it on their home computers. Their wives and kids will see it and begin to use it. They'll tell their friends, etc., etc... Word of mouth is a GoodThing(TM).

    Personally, I've been using TBird since it was first released and have never had any problems with it. Maybe I'm just lucky but it's been rock-solid for me. I currently use TBird on WinNT4 at work and on my laptop, which runs Mandrake 9.2. My wife, (who is not in the least computer literate), has no trouble at all with TBird on her Win98 box. This open source app is ready for mass use!

    --
    "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    1. Re:Just this week... by kliklik · · Score: 1
      The only thing we're missing is Outlooks ability to insert multiple 'signatures'. Anyone know if this is currently possible in TBird? Having blocks of pre-typed text ready to go at the click of your mouse is a real time-saver.

      There is an extension called TagZilla that should do the trick. There is no version for Thunderbird 0.7 yet, but at least you know that it exists.

      --
      guru in training
    2. Re:Just this week... by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... thanks for the suggestion. TagZilla looks interesting but it seems to just be for single-sentence inserts. I need to insert multiple lines of text like...

      *** Disclaimer ***
      This product quotation is subject to the blah, and
      the blah, and the blah, blah, blah. Any use of
      this product is blah, blah, blah... and is therefore
      subject to the blah and the blah.

      ... and stuff like that. TBird has a signature file pointer but lacks a signature 'picker' ala Outlook. If I was a coder, I would try to implement this myself - but I'm not. So I won't! :-) Guess I'll go to the TBird forums and suggest it. Maybe it will be included in a future release...

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    3. Re:Just this week... by kliklik · · Score: 2, Informative

      It works with multiline inserts too. It can be configured to insert signatures automaticly or popup an window for you to choose which one to insert when you press send.

      --
      guru in training
    4. Re:Just this week... by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      Cool! I guess I didn't look closely enough at the TagZilla website. I'll scrutinize it more closely over the weekend when I (hope to) have more time.

      Thanks for the tip!!

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  51. Re:YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

    Try manually logging into yahoomail.com with your web browser.

    Since Yahoo upgraded all their accounts, there is now an "okay" screen you must click to acknowledge the upgrade. Once you click that, you'll never see it again, then YahooPOPs will work fine. :)

  52. Re:One wish.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    One thing I wish is that the spam detection would detect illegal tags and flag messages with too many of them as spam. Anything inside angle brackets isn't shown to the user but they are thrown every three letters in so that it screws with the filters.

    It's kind of frustrating that Thunderbird doesn't offer any flexibility in its spam detector.

  53. Malicious site for Mozilla users by tmk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The site http://xxxtoolbar.com/ tries to install a malicious program as XPI.

    Is this a proof of acceptance or is it an alarm signal?

    1. Re:Malicious site for Mozilla users by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Duh. This contains a link to pornography. Stupid me opened it at work. That was embarassing.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:Malicious site for Mozilla users by tmk · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I thought this was obvious. There is no link in my comment, I just wrote the URL in plain text.

  54. Am I the only one by asl24 · · Score: 0

    who hates Mozilla? Argh! It's got some decent features, but I just don't like it (actually, I hate it with a flared-pink passion). What, exactly, is it that I'm missing that makes this the end-all be-all?

    --
    I signed this
  55. SeaMonkey is in maintenance mode by Anthracks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every time there's a Mozilla story on Slashdot, several people make this comment and they all get modded up to +5. SeaMonkey (the suite) receives a very small amount of the official "Mozilla Foundation" support. It's essentially in maintenance mode, with only relatively minor work being done to it. Now *Gecko*, and the Mozilla-as-platform work, are still actively maintained, but that's not the same as working on SeaMonkey. SeaMonkey happens to benefit from work on Gecko, since both it, Firefox and Thunderbird run on the same engine, but a very small percentage of work going on now is beneficial only to SeaMonkey.

    Compare the new features in Mozilla 1.7 to the new features in Firefox 0.9/Thunderbird 0.7. I think you'll find very few that are limited exclusively to SeaMonkey, and vastly more that are found in the new apps but not the suite. The suite is minimally supported because some major coporations and organizations have rolled it out and contribute back code, money, etc. to keep it going, but it's definitely not even close to the main development focus as the new apps are.

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
  56. Re:Just moved from Mozilla 1.6; will have to rever by thesolo · · Score: 2, Informative

    E.g. with a group of tabs on the tab bar Mozilla: click on tab, all tabs open & start loading Firefox: you get dropdown; for maximum hassle, the choice I want(Open in tabs) is always at bottom. Nor have I found way to set "add tabs" versus "replace tabs" preference.

    To get a group of bookmarked tabs to open in addition to your already opened tabs in Firefox, do the following:
    1) Open a new tab, type about:config, hit enter.
    2) Find the entry called browser.tabs.loadFolderAndReplace, and double click it.
    3) Change the value from true to false.

    Tada! Now Firefox will open your bookmarked groups in new tabs, not replace your existing ones.

    Additionally, you can simply middle-click on the bookmark folder name, and it will open all of the tabs contained in it. This way you don't have to go down to the "Open in Tabs" item at the bottom of the list.

    Enjoy!

  57. Dumb thing keeps crashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't handle calendar extension which worked fine in previous version -- of course this may be a calendar extension problem and not a thunderbird problem.

    Firefox crashes as well -- when going to bank of america site and entering password and trying to log in, Firefox crashes and urges me to send in a bug report via talkback software (not quite a security risk I'm willing to take -- send in my user name and password from my bank?!!)

    Hope these bugs get fixed quickly.
    The latest mozilla works fine though.

  58. URLs still don't work by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something very obvious, but after installing Firefox 0.9 and then Thunderbird 0.7, I *still* can't click on a URL in Thunderbird and have it open Firefox at the appropriate page. Why the hell not? Isn't this fairly basic functionality?

    It's ironic. The big problem with the all-in-one Mozilla suite, for me, was that it always tried to launch Mozilla Mail even though I had defined a different e-mail package as my system mailer. Now I have the opposite problem.

    (Using Linux, on the off chance that anyone actually knows the answer.)

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:URLs still don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we might be able to help, in the off chance that you will reply and let us know what distribution and desktop environment you're using.

    2. Re:URLs still don't work by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Probably a mime type thing in your Window Manager.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:URLs still don't work by KnightStalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Find out how to work around that here: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/thunderbird/linuxu rls.html

      This is a pretty major UI bug in T-bird, IMO.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    4. Re:URLs still don't work by normal_guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a very good link for both this and mailto: links in Firefox. I agree that this is a MAJOR design flaw in Firefox and Thunderbird.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
  59. Re:One wish.. by Anthracks · · Score: 1

    I actually took a look at this after seeing your post, since that glitch pisses me off too. It looks like it's not as simple as it seems to fix...I found the proper place in the code to change, but it had dire warnings that the search should be case-sensitive due to http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121478 . They acknowledge that making the search case sensitive introduced this new bug we're seeing, but I guess the old one was deemed more important/annoying. There's probably a way for both fixes to co-exist, but nothing jumps out at me.

    BTW, if you're curious, this is the function in question: http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/mailnews/add rbook/src/nsAbAddressCollecter.cpp#89

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
  60. I'm waiting for Thunderfox by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's supposed to be much faster.

  61. Re:One wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Can believe you're finding it so hard, frankly.

    Can or cannot?

  62. Re:Just moved from Mozilla 1.6; will have to rever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hello, my name is Toccoa and I am a tab-aholoic.
    [group voices]Hi Toccoa.[/group voices]
  63. Re:how about sperating out composer and adding to by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 0, Troll
    "...so that it can do everything frontpage can do."

    You mean like crashing every time I try to save my local files to my remote web server?*

    *Yes, this happens all the time. I started using FTP, even though the official word is that FTP is a no-no in conjunction with FP sites... just so I could actually update my pages without having to force a reboot.

    --

    Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  64. Re:One wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now do it in a language that Thunderbird actually understands.

  65. SlimBrowser by crayak · · Score: 1
    SlimBrowser is the best alternative to IE. My previous experience with modzilla based browsers is that some sites just don't work. i honestly don't see the point in using a browser if you have to periodically switch back to IE, at every site thats got one to many pics or uses some new web dev. technology. So check out
    • http://www.flashpeak.com/sbrowser/
  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. MD 20/20 vision by Black+Art · · Score: 1

    I am just wondering if Thunderbird is going to have a ripple effect.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  69. Re:One wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that anything before the @ is case-insensitive violates RFC2822 section 3.4. Actually, most mail clients violate this RFC, since it allows for just about anything before the @. I've even seen stupid web forms that assume you can't put a + in an email address! Anything after the @, OTOH, is case insensitive (RFC1035 section 2.3.3).

  70. Mozilla Sunbird by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to point out for people needing a calendar, there is the Sunbird project which aims to build a standalone PIM application. While it is fairly good at the moment, it still needs a lot of work. Plus it needs a few more developers. If you have the time go help out. If they ever get round to integrating Thunderbird and Sunbird, we'll have one kickass Outlook killing application!! (don't mention Evolution - it really isn't cross-platform as such).

  71. Again, your fault. by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    First off, I think Firefox and Thunderbird are terrific applications. I also applaud your desire to want people to switch to them. However, you need to exercise patience when trying to win over non-technical minded friends, for the same reasons I outlined in my previous post.

    I can't wait to switch my father over to using Firefox and Thunderbird. However, I'm patiently waiting until they hit 1.0 releases, knowing that what is out there now is not stable.

    Again, I hope you continue to want to convert people over from IE. However, doing so too soon could be more of a disservice to those people and the cause.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  72. Re:YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now by deque_alpha · · Score: 1


    I know it runs contrary to everything the Open Source movement stands for, but it might be worth paying real money for a real service.


    Very, very valid point. However, you could also just find someone else who is still willing to give it away...

  73. Re:One wish.. by Piobaire · · Score: 1

    I'd be tired of that too. Fred has been dead for ages.

  74. PMSL by CJSpil · · Score: 1

    You made me laugh so much, I snorted beer out through my nose... what a waste of good beer!

    --
    For people who like peace and quiet. A phoneless cord!
  75. 0.7 buggy ? by mbyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found that 0.7 is much more buggy than 0.5 ... at least on win32, the new mail notification in the taskbar is broken (no icon), enigmail does not work anymore, cross imap server moving of email did stop working ...

    At least for me a huge step backwards from 0.5 :(

    1. Re:0.7 buggy ? by CritterNYC · · Score: 3, Informative

      I found that 0.7 is much more buggy than 0.5 ... at least on win32, the new mail notification in the taskbar is broken (no icon), enigmail does not work anymore, cross imap server moving of email did stop working ...

      At least for me a huge step backwards from 0.5 :(


      You need to do a completely fresh install of 0.7. Lots of stuff changed. The entire extension system is different, so you need to install the updated enigmail. Cross-IMAP server moves work fine (just did one). And the tray icon for mail notificatiions is sitting in my systray right now.

      The installation instructions should really be followed for the latest version!

  76. slow spell checker? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    My biggest TB complaint is that invoking the spell checker takes WAY too long. On Windows, if I press F7 to spell check an email, TB freezes for 10-20 seconds. And the "no words misspelled" dialog looks too similar to the "here is a misspelled word" dialog. When I see one of these dialogs, I have to spend 5-10 seconds scrutinizing the dialog's small print to determine if I misspelled a word or if everything is OK. :(

  77. LDAP addresses on junkmail whitelist by billtom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know if you can get addresses in your LDAP server onto the junkmail whitelist?

    I mean the part in the junkmail configuration screen where you can say "don't mark mail from people in my address book as junk" and pick either your personal address book or your collected addresses (but not both, wtf?). But there doesn't seem to be any way to specify an LDAP server that you have configured.

  78. thunderbird a tale of woe! by watsondk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did the deed and upgraded OSX thunderbird to 0.7, only to see all my settings vanish

    yes really, 5 news server with dozens of groups, all gone, thankfully I don't use it for email (sticking to mail.app)

    FFS moving to 0.6 did not do this

    did they actually test this....

  79. Re:YahooPOPs Broke, GF doesnt like Thunderbird now by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, what did Firefox render incorrectly? I use it to view my Yahoo! mail, and I never noticed a problem (maybe because I've been using it so long I don't know what it looks like in IE?)

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  80. I'm a fan... BUT... by gwoodrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only person who thinks that Mozilla's bang-bang-bang 3 releases in a row of their most notable software seems kind of like a premature orgasm? Are they blowing their load too quickly? Should they have released more gradually and carefully? With the bugs I enountered with Thunderbird, I certainly think so. Firefox seems okay despite the rush... except for the fact that whenever I apply a new skin in Mac OS X - the scroll bar is missing. That's a bizarre bug that you'd think would've been caught.

  81. Make a Mozilla file browser by Sark666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People always critized microsoft that they cheated by having the browser in memory but this is a handy feature that kde does as well (well, gives you the option of how many konquerer's you want resident in memory).

    I currently use ff,tb but I would use the suite if it had a file browser mode. And I'd love to be able to keep it in memory or even better components of it at least. Cause once you stray from kde/gnome, I find the choices if file browser a little lacking.

    Now, I know there are tons of options out there, but I guess I prefer a similar browser to windows explorer, and I've tried the lot of em. From xfe, xfwm, endeavour, and just about every single one that looked remotely like a browser similar to windows explorer. It would be great if mozilla had this.

    And off topic but I wish there was a way in linux to have things stay in memory. I know mozilla used to have this feature and it was removed to never return, but I think X or the wm should control this.

    Say I'd like to have my file browser, file find,a text editor and maybe xchat always in memory. You should be able to specify applications that never leave the swap.

  82. Not a design flaw by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

    This could really be remedied easily by including a slightly more complicated shell script than the ones in the links we posted, in the t-bird and firefox linux distributions. All it would have to do (I imagine) would be to check for the most likely of several different standards for identifying the default browser, and launch it using the appropriate template. Or else add a visible preference for it in the config dialog. The first would cover 95% of linux usage, and the couple guys who use w3m as their main browser can write their own damn shell script. I think this is just a matter of nobody having the energy or time to add the tools to make things work right. I'd do it myself if I wasn't so lazy :-)

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  83. Why didn't you just try by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1
    emerge mozilla-thunderbird
    scnr
  84. Re:how about sperating out composer and adding to by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

    Nvu is a standalone WYSIWYG web authoring system based on Mozilla Composer and may become an official Mozilla project in the future. Downloads are available for Linux and Windows. It's still young, but it gets better with every version.

  85. IMAP Calendar by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    I think what would be nice, if the calendar project were distributed with tbird, or say "thunderbird pro" and had an option of using an IMAP folder to store calendar data... "__calendar" and "__tasks" and have the option to use those, and hide in the imap folder list on the left.. then it could be used like outlook, without exchange.. :) addon public folders, etc... this would actually be a *VERY* nice thing IMHO, and utilize an existing standard (imap) for centralized calendars... maybe just have the calendar run its' own connections for data.. etc..

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  86. Re:One wish.. by iantri · · Score: 1
    It sounds like a good idea but AFAIK the user part of the e-mail address is not (according to the RFCs) necessarily case insensitive.

    In practice, most will be lowercase or the mailer daemon will make an attempt to be case insensitive, but on a *NIX system there is always a chance.

  87. Re:One wish.. by iantri · · Score: 1
    FYI, it is in RFC 821.

    The domain, is of course, case insensitive, since DNS is.