Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: New Voyages, Downloadable Video

tm2b writes "What if you could make new episodes of the original Star Trek, with the same characters, worse acting (believe it or not), better special effects, and lower resolution? It seems that some fans secured the Roddenberry family's support for doing just that. They call it Star Trek: New Voyages and they've completed one full episode and and working on another to be released in August. They plan to pick up with the fourth year of the "five year mission," and the first episode can be downloaded in zipped WMV format. It's worth checking out if you can ignore acting that actually makes you yearn for the quality of the original cast. Personally, I love seeing what they can do rendering the old ST tech with modern CGI."

349 comments

  1. Torrent? by The+Iconoclast · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone want to set up a .torrent file?

    --
    Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
    1. Re:Torrent? by Hinkey · · Score: 1

      If someone who allready has the whole episode doesnt post a .torrent link no one else is gonna get to see this for another 2 hours.

      --
      -=Hinkey=-
    2. Re:Torrent? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's go with the .torrent, I'm getting just over 300 baud from any of those mirrors...

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    3. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know what would be useful?

      A system like BitTorrent, but that could also be seeded with a list of URLs where the file is available online.

      All copies of the software would work together, which each user automatically and optimally assigned different parts of the files to retrieve from the URLs. Using Content-Range: and those "seed" URLs, each user would download a different part to get things rolling. Then they would all work collectively to send those parts of the files back and forth between each other, until everyone has the whole file.

    4. Re:Torrent? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or better yet, anyone got an MPEG or other decent format?

    5. Re:Torrent? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      Baud!?

      If you're still using that ancient unit, I really doubt you can get much better? :-O

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Torrent? by rasz · · Score: 1

      yes, torrent would be GREAT, all the mirrors are shashdotted :(

    7. Re:Torrent? by Syre · · Score: 4, Informative

      Overnet already does something kind of like this.

    8. Re:Torrent? by Alsee · · Score: 0, Redundant

      no one else is gonna get to see this for another 2 hours.

      Two hours? You're kidding, right?

      Of the three mirrors...
      I am downloading part one from mirror one.
      Elapsed time: 20 minutes. Time left: 112 hours and climbing
      I am downloading part two from mirror two.
      Elapsed time: 19 minutes. Time left 60 hours and climbing
      Oh, and mirror three? Not responding at all.

      The power of ... the slash ... dot effect is ... beyond ..... comprehension.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, are you sure? I use Overnet but can't find the option; any hint as to where it's at?

      I know Overnet works to share between people like that once the file is already in the Overnet (as does BitTorrent), but I don't see how to make it have a bunch of people collectively download the same file from a web site at once and then share the pieces. The difference is in the seeding; from a complete copy of the file on one user's hard drive, or from one (or more) web sites that everyone can start out by grabbing pieces of.

      (Doing it as the grandparent AC post suggested means that the web site experiences bandwidth equivalent to just one download of the file, and yet no one user has to wait for their copy of the file to finish downloading from the web site. Which is kind of cool.)

    10. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he is French? :-)

      baud noun One signal change per second, a measure of data-transmission speed. Named after the French engineer and telegrapher Jean-Maurice-Emile Baudot and originally used to measure the transmission speed of telegraph equipment, the term now most commonly refers to the data-transmission speed of a modem.

    11. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should be posting the files using http://freecache.org

    12. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... GetRight. (or other download managers that has this feature as well)

    13. Re:Torrent? by Drawsalot · · Score: 1

      I hadn't used Bit Torrent, but gave it a try. Here's a linhttp://www.torrentreactor.net/torrents/view_135 90k: It's a good first effort for a bunch of Trek fans with no budget and lots of drive!

    14. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. The eDonkey protocol is garbage. It needs a reworked queue system. I've seen queues as large as 3000, nevermind the slow speed that occurs after waiting in the horrible queue.

    15. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BitTorrent has an HTTP seeding mode...

      G2, and the internet standard magnet links, have URL source modes...

    16. Re:Torrent? by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      How could a reworked queue system reduce the length of the queue? If there are only so many download slots, so many people who want to download, and such a length of time to download a file, what could change the length of the queue?

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    17. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the correct link, but it doesn't matter much because the tracker is dead.

    18. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he is serious.. I'm on broadband and I am getting roughly 300 bytes per second from mirror1. I'm not sure how 300 baud related to bytes per second but its probably close

    19. Re:Torrent? by PsykhoKiwi · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that he's dead Jim, dead Jim, dead Jim!

      --
      Just remember that if the world didn't suck we'd all fall off.
    20. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      300 baud = 300 bits per second, so assuming there's no compression 300 bytes per second * 8 bits per byte = 2400 bps (baud).

      In other worse, nope, not close at all.

      btw - my dad used to have a 300 bps modem with his old Atari 800 ;) I think he's still got it somewhere, though I've never tried it out.

    21. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      300 baud != 300 bps. A 300 baud modem typically was 300 bps, but not because the units are equal. A modern 57.6kbps modem is only around 4800 baud.

      I used to have a 110 baud acoustic modem. It seemed lightening fast when I upgraded it to 300 baud. I even had a printer (Digital Decwriter II - LA36) with a 300 baud acoustic modem built in; just set your phone handset on the back of the printer and the data coming over the line prints.

    22. Re:Torrent? by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

      Time left: 112 hours

      56k modems suck, huh?

      --

      --
      What would Bill Clinton do?
    23. Re:Torrent? by Jibber · · Score: 1

      Actually mirror 1 is running thttpd with a throttle. It's not /.'d.

      If you notice the main page comes up just fine, but the download speed doesn't come anywhere near the speed of the main page.

      If people let others download first, then it would speed up for everyone.

      I'll look into adding a Max Users to speed it up for those who get a connection.

      Jib

    24. Re:Torrent? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      56k modems suck, huh?

      I'm some pretty sweet broadband. I can hit a full 1000 times 56k speed, over 5Mbps.

      Oh... were you reffering to the server? Yeah, that does suck. :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    25. Re:Torrent? by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they can afford photoshop (whatever the hell graphics program they're using) but a decent server is out of the question. Just as well, I saw the teaser; saying it fucking sucks is a nice review.

      --

      --
      What would Bill Clinton do?
    26. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. All P2P protocols suffer from this, its because everyone has much larger download capacities than upload - you can't manufacture upload capacities that don't exist. Everyone who is on a p2p network is too busy hogging download capacities so upload is always disproportionately small.
      In my experience & as far as p2p goes, the edonkey network is one of the most effective I've used.

  2. Thanks for the warning! by RLiegh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've heard about this before, but I wasn't able to get any clips (I think that their download site was down? I don't remember). Since i was on dialup at the time, I'm glad I didn't waste my time on it.

    This is truly a service to the /. community. Now I know to give this turkey a wiiide birth.

    1. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? Did you post on the wrong article or something?

    2. Re:Thanks for the warning! by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      oh come on...lighten up a tad...a smidgeon.

      Have some fun, it may be so bad it's good. Or has all the humor and fun been beaten out of our cynical society today?

      Does anyone remember laughter?

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    3. Re:Thanks for the warning! by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      If I want "so bad it's good" I can look up old mst3k episodes on edonkey or something...I'm sorry, I've seen quite enough public-access-cable quality acting to last a lifetime, probably three.

      Besides, if I want cheese, I have the original episodes; why would I want new ones that are even worse?

    4. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you keep coming up with the idea that it is "bad"? Are you just making this sh*t up? "Bad acting" doesn't mean that it's bad in any way; it's just a poke at Shatner.

    5. Re:Thanks for the warning! by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      From the summary:
      t's worth checking out if you can ignore acting that actually makes you yearn for the quality of the original cast.

      As I said previously; thanks for the warning.

    6. Re:Thanks for the warning! by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1
      Does anyone remember laughter?
      <spock>Laughter is illogical.</spock>
      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
    7. Re:Thanks for the warning! by ScottGant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right...why even make anything like this, we have stuff like it now. If you want to see bad stuff just watch old MST3K, or cheese and bad acting just watch old Trek.

      In fact, why make anything anymore? I mean, everything has been done already. If I want action movie just watch Die Hard, if I want fantasy just watch LOTR, if I want comedy just watch Young Frankenstein.

      If I want music just listen to Chuck Berry, everything else has been done before. I've listened to enough music to last a lifetime, probably three.

      Why paint anything anymore, I have a nice Picasso right here. Why read or write anything anymore because it's all been read and written before.

      Thanks! You've freed up so much of my time now!

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    8. Re:Thanks for the warning! by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have the original episodes; why would I want new ones that are even worse?

      To boldy where no one has gone before?

    9. Re:Thanks for the warning! by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      You seem to think I'm arguing against making anything new; I'm not, I'm just objecting to crappy rip-offs of stuff that is old.

      But hey, if you like continually regurgitated shows, each one a paler version of the last, then at least we know who hollywood is aiming their constant stream of remakes to.

      With all your "freed up" time, you can go catch the new stepford wives. enjoy!

    10. Re:Thanks for the warning! by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      I have absolutely no desire to see what's down the toilet, which is where it sounds like effort goes.

      Ironically, no one has stepped up to the plate to say "you know, I've seen this, and the summary is wrong, it is pretty good" or even said that "yeah, it's bad acting, but it's not as bad as TOS and it really is fun"....

      Ironically no-one disputes it's shite; only that I'm somehow odd for saying "wow, it's shite? thanks for letting me know, I'll give it a miss".

    11. Re:Thanks for the warning! by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      With all your "freed up" time, you can go catch the new stepford wives. enjoy!

      Touche! I concede to defeat.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    12. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spock did not seem to think laughter was illogical when he was doing this

    13. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically no-one disputes it's shite

      That's because we don't follow the links, much less watch the videos, before jumping into the discussion. If you wanted discussion with people who knew about the subject, what're you doing here?

    14. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanted discussion with people who knew about the subject, what're you doing here?
      Killing time until I meet someone through slashdot personals.

      *crickets chirp*

    15. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killing time until I meet someone through slashdot personals.

      WHAT?!? WHERE DO I FIND THOSE?!? I've been needing to meet a real, breathing person for years!!! Give me a link, and hurry! Finally, the Internet is useful for somethiing!

    16. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      Why paint anything anymore, I have a nice Picasso right here.

      I'm guessing that there are not a lot of other slashdot readers that can say they have "a nice Picasso right here." In fact, this should almost be moderated "-1 excessive bragging," except of course there is no such category.

      Anyone else think that it would be nice to be able to create your own moderation categories on the fly? The only problem would be that readers couldn't add or subtract a custom amount for them (at least until they became popular enough to make it to the preferences page). It would probably be impractical to have a widget for each moderation any of the 1e9 posters created each day....

    17. Re:Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To boldy where no one has gone before?

      To boldly what ?
      Picard (TS-TNG) changed the phrase "where no man" to "where no one", but Kirk's (TS-TOS) phrase was "where no man".
      If you can't spell, at least get the quote correct, OK?

    18. Re:Thanks for the warning! by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was kinda joking...I have a Picasso poster that cost me all of $20 bucks.

      No way could I afford any original art unless it's sold for around $20...and even that is pushing it.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  3. WMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zipped WMV Format? Is this some sort of Romulan Empire technology I'm not familiar with? Boy, let me rush right over and download that! :P

    1. Re:WMV by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Funny

      WMV is a tool of the Devil.

      Really? Why? Or rather, why moreso than Quicktime?

    2. Re:WMV by Barryke · · Score: 1

      Really? Why? Or rather, why moreso than Quicktime?

      WMV has just to many subformats.
      With a .mov file, you just KNOW you're gonna be able to play it without that one video or audio codec that you didn't already had installed.

      Hoooo..sooooo you mean this is in WMV format? So you downloaded? make a .torrent i wil put you in my friends list :)

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    3. Re:WMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RED ALERT!! Raise the Steve Jobs reality distortion field.

    4. Re:WMV by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "WMV is a tool of the Devil."

      +4 Insightful?! WMV == Bad no matter what? Eh?

      It can reach an audience in the 10's of millions without needing to install new software. It has a decent compression rate. It's free to author it. Etc etc etc. Tool of the devil? Grow up.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:WMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's from Microsoft, are you new here? And... oh, 1359 you say... never mind then.

    6. Re:WMV by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure sure that comparing it with QuickTime is valid. QuickTime is a media architecture (with a player), and WMV is a video format. I definitely prefer QuickTime, as I can use its player for virtually every format out there - with the exception of WMA/WMV (funny that), and those horrible Real formats.

    7. Re:WMV by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      So you downloaded? make a .torrent i wil put you in my friends list :)

      Wget'ing veerryyy slowwwly in the background...

    8. Re:WMV by Mr.Radar · · Score: 1
      Really? Why? Or rather, why moreso than Quicktime?

      Because WMV is made by Microsoft and Quicktime is made by Apple, and as we all know Apple is good and Microsoft is evil.
      __________________
      --
      What if this signature were clever?
    9. Re:WMV by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Could have something to do with the Windows QT client not sucking nearly as hard as the Mac WMP. Every time anyone complains about QT for Windows, I want to show them the abomination that is the Mac WMP.

      Granted, it would be nice if both companies embraced open standards, but for now it's picking the lesser of two evils.

    10. Re:WMV by SteveXE · · Score: 1

      i like WMV, a file of the same quality is 1/2 the size of its quicktime alternative.

    11. Re:WMV by mah! · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is picking the lesser of the two evils precisely in how much either company embraces open standards. Compare the following two links:
      • Support for MPEG-4 in QuickTime (for developers) and (for end users) where they write:
        MPEG-4 provides an open playing field. As an open, industry standard, anyone can create an MPEG-4 player or encoder that will work with other manufacturer's devices.
      • Microsoft and MPEG-4 where it's clearly stated that:
        while Microsoft continues to support the MPEG-4 standardization process, it is moving forward with the development of audio and video technologies that deliver superior quality and an end-to-end streaming solution for Microsoft customers
        i.e. they're not much interested in working with others on open standards. They want to license but keep it proprietary.
      It's quite clear to me which one is the less of the two evils here, i.e. which company works on actively promoting open standards.
      More about MPEG licensing at the MPEG Industry Forum's web site.
    12. Re:WMV by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Quicktime is at least "mostly" open. Standard container format (basis for MPEG-4 and all!) that supports actually sensible compression methods like MPEG-4 video and MP3 audio. (Just remember to pay the license fees for those.)

      While, of course, Microsoft will get ve-ry ve-ry ang-ry if you try to use ASF for anything.

      Of course, both are heavily patented behemoths, but at least Apple has nothing particular against those people that develop programs to handle QT files.

      And, of course, Windows players for both of them kind of suck, but that's obvious. =)

    13. Re:WMV by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      WMV3 is a trojan horse for conquering the media diffusion market and preparing the battle for the media center. It's a tool of anticompetition, trying to extinguish open initiatives (XVid and al.) and push competitors (Quicktime and Real) out. It's intended to be platform-locked, especially in its last (and certainly in future) version. It's a plea for the exclusive use of proprietary software and abandon of interoperability, made by a convicted illegal monopoly.

      But this is off-topic.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
  4. Torrent Mirrior Please by Ieshan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This? Perfect application for bittorrent.

    Someone please post a torrent mirror. =)

  5. *WORSE* acting??? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Worse than Shatner?

    Oh.....come.....on.....I.....find that......hard....to.....believe!

    1. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      caaaaahhhhhhnnnnnnnnn*coff coff coff*

    2. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by ryg0r · · Score: 2, Funny
      Kirk: Captains log.....Stardate 38436.2....We are lost.....Floating near an unknown quadrant of the galaxy....
      Uhura calls out: No we're not...Thats Uranus!
      Kirk: Ahhh come on! Surely....that joke is..... wearing a little thin!
      Spock: I believe that is illogical captain, seeing as you are not wearing any pants

      Yep, I miss the old Star Trek series.....

      --
      Karma whoring .sigs don't work
    3. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      For those that haven't seen it yet and fail to believe the possibility of worse acting, watch Starship Exeter. I kid you not, it's frightening and full of that classic star trek alien/android 'i don't get that joke' humour that makes you sooo angry.

    4. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oh.....come.....on.....I.....find that......hard....to.....believe!


      Uhh, no, I think you mean: Oh.....come.....ON.....I.....find THAT......hard....TO.....beLIEVE!

    5. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

      Since the mispelling of Kahn you are justified in your posting anonymously.

      May you be forever banished to the harsh world of Ceti Alpha V if you are ever found.

      *sigh* - only because the wife watches this movie so much that I know this...

      (Maybe I can join you?)

      --
      BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
    6. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the guy has been on the tv and movie screen
      alot longer than some better actors !

      got to give him credit !

    7. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Bloody+Pulp · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's Khan not Kahn.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084726/combined

    8. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Surazal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Starship Exeter is not as bad as Hidden Frontier.

      Starship Exeter: Done old-school style, and the actors are not that horrible to watch. I even feel nostolgic just watching it, pining for the good old days.

      Hidden Frontier: Done with schnazzy new graphics, but the actors want to make you scream. I mean, apparently, Star Fleet's Weight-Loss Program just isn't as effective in TNG time or something. This show proves that very large people who can barely fit into obviously home-tailored uniforms still hs the ability to make me nauseous.

      I'll have to check out the new episodes I haven't yet seen on Starship Exeter (last I checked before today they just had the first one completed and the next was still months away from production).

      And for this new one, well, sheessh, it's just something else to kill yet more time with this evening. ;^)

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    9. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the women playing Captain Shelby and Lt. MacFarland on Hidden Frontier are HOT!!

    10. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, why did I download that? One word: ARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH.

    11. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by pilkul · · Score: 1

      They're both equally awful, as far as I'm concerned. Things like this should always be parodies --- that way, the badness of the acting and the sets becomes part of the joke. Otherwise, it's just painful.

    12. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

      Heh - well damn it. Guess that renders me pretty silly looking as well. Honest typo...

      Preview!....Preview!...PRE-E-E-E-E-V-I-E-W-W-W-W !

      --
      BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
    13. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Syre · · Score: 1

      Wow that was bad.

      I just finally got around to watching the Teaser, and pee-yew, that acting sucks. It's so bad, it's really painful to watch.

      It's not hard to get reasonable actors to work for free. There are thousands of 'em out there begging to do something like this just to put it in their resume-reels.

      Technically, it looks great. The Bridge looks pretty much like the original Bridge of the Enterprise, and the exteriors look fine too.

      The sound recording is bad though -- echoey and amateurish.

      I hate complaining about something that's free and was obviously done out of lots o' love, but... if you're gonna put that much effort into something, please get some actors who are not embarrasing to watch.

    14. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Surazal · · Score: 1

      Which one were you talking about? Exeter? Frontier? You were complaining about it; I need ifnot, darnit! :^)

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    15. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Are there other formats besides Quicktime? Dammit Jim! Supply...Multiple...Formats...People! Mpeg is usually good.

    16. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by Surazal · · Score: 1
      Forget my request for infot. "Information" aka "info" will do just fine.

      /me wishes I could catch all typos before I hit "Submit". ;^)

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    17. Re:*WORSE* acting??? by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      If you want bad acting, check out the Star Wars Holiday Special. You'll have to google it yourself, but its out there, and its bad. Exeter deserves an oscars sweep compared to the SWHS.

  6. What's next? by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny
    Star Trek Fan Fiction Fan Fiction?

    WARNING:Approaching Nerd Factor 9. . .

    Seriously, though, I salute their courage and hard work. This can't have been simple to put together.

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:What's next? by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It does look like they've put an unimaginable amount of thought, time and effort into this; it's just a damned shame that they couldn't have gotten people who can actually act for it.

      They decided that going for the visual resemblence of TOS cast was more important than hiring (or recruiting, I'm sure tons of people would volunteer) people who actually can act to play the parts.

      Personally, I'd rather see someone who looks nothing like shatner but is able to act play the part of kirk than watch a shatner-alike ham it up.

    2. Re:What's next? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      WARNING:Approaching Nerd Factor 9. . .

      Cap'n, I canna giv' ye Nerd Factor 9. The lassie weel only go 11 and up.

      KFG

    3. Re:What's next? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I'd rather see someone who looks nothing like shatner but is able to act play the part of kirk than watch a shatner-alike ham it up."

      The problem with that is people that can do that have a talent they can make money with.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:What's next? by Epistax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seeing all the things Shatner is in right now I'd bet he'd be willing to do it himself for minimum wage... That still doesn't solve your basic complaint though.

    5. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minimum union wage is still way more than these guys can afford.

    6. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denny Crane!

    7. Re:What's next? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1
      They decided that going for the visual resemblence of TOS cast was more important than hiring (or recruiting, I'm sure tons of people would volunteer) people who actually can act to play the parts.

      After visiting their site, and reading their FAQ (while slooowly downloading the trailer..) I read this direct quote...
      How will the characters be portrayed?

      The original Star Trek characters are so well known that the task of recasting the parts seems impossible. We are not casting people who look or act like the original actors. What we don't want is a parody - an actor imitating William Shatner doing Kirk for example. We want actors who will be able to remind us of our old friends, but bring to the characters a new life, a fresh interpretation, not a stale imitation. The cast we are assembling are actors first - and a few have only now begun viewing TOS episodes. But what they bring to the table is talent and vitality. They will be believable as these characters and will be as effective as any Trek cast thus far! In addition, the cast will be seen in a "21st Century" light. Our crew has grown as they reach their 4th year together!
      Read the FAQ for yourself.
      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      KFG?

      What's that supposed to be? Oh, I know:

      KENTUCKY FRIED GHEY

  7. BitTorrent link? by ClausCCC · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Could someone who already downloaded this please seed a torrent? No need to take all the mirrors down.

    1. Re:BitTorrent link? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course there's no need to take all the mirrors down but it's too late for such kindness because to paraphrase Mr Scott in "Wrath of Khan"

      Kirk: "We've got to set up a torrent! The mirrors will die!"
      Scotty: "They're dead already!"

      New episodes of Star Trek (in any form) + Slashdot = server death. No way around it.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:BitTorrent link? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      There is a way around it, it's called bittorrent. It is beyond my comprehension that people choose to distribute this kind of stuff any way other than bittorrent. BT is easy to install on Windows (the majority of people will be using it) where it integrates with the browser, and on other platforms you can count on people being bright enough to install BT themselves.

      You would think that a bunch of nerds would have realized that BT exists, and that it would be the best way to distribute something like this.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:BitTorrent link? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well yes, you'd think that alright...

      And now that the servers are presumably being hammered into oblivion, there's no-doubt a server admin who's crying into his wafflecone as he frantically searches google to figure out how to get it installed/running.

      That's one reason I really like the Azureus client - besides being a great downloading client, it can host it's own torrent server and is extremely easy to set-up & operate.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    4. Re:BitTorrent link? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, Azureus is great. I originally used the BT client (nothing else was available) and then ABC, but when the motherboard of my windows system died (I've had more hardware failures than Windows XP reinstalls with this system, pretty sad considering I'm not buying crap components for the most part, except maybe the dvd+-rw I have in here now) I had to find something decent for use on Linux. Right now I'm sitting at the console of my firewall which is a celery 466 with 256MB using gnome2, mozilla, azureus, etc. It's only particularly slow when I am compiling something...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Hidden Frontier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Another great fan made Star Trek is Hidden Frontier

  9. Are they trying to... by dotslashconfig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make the Star Trek name absolute mud? Honestly, it has all been downhill since TNG...

    Star Trek DS9: "To boldly go... no where. We're on a freaking space station people. We stay stationary, people... that's our job - to be dull!"

    Star Trek Voyager: "To boldly promote the worst captain ever! Yeah, Janeway - you go, girl. Magically know stuff that no one else does. Cool, baby!!!"

    Star Trek Enterprise: "To boldly go and fuck up the entire timeline."

    Give it up, already... this is just getting pathetic. Leave us with the good stuff and get rid of this marketing money-driven drivel.

    1. Re:Are they trying to... by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      I agree to a point. TNG was the peak of Trek. I loved that series and the best Trek movie was TNG...."First Contact".

      DS9 was ok...the second season with the Dominion was probably the best, but they lost their way with the series.

      Never got into Voyager and I haven't seen one episode of Enterprise.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    2. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last 3 seaons of DS9 were actually very good. Granted, the first 2 were beyond boring.

    3. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voyager may have been complete crap, but at least the borg-lady looked hot in her skin-tight suit.

    4. Re:Are they trying to... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      DS9 is less hoaky than TNG, but then TNG got less hoaky after Rodenberry died, so that is probably the reason.

      DS9 also had a better lead off than TNG, he first 3 seasons were god where the first 3 seasons of TNG were cheap sets, bad music, and weird camera shots.

      Voyager just took the PCness of TNG to an entirly new level and it pissed me off.

      Enterprise lost its way in he first season, and no that the 3rd season is over, I actually like what I saw. there might actually be a movie to come out of it like the birth of the federation or something since the event of the first federation conference happens just outside the traditional 7 year span of the shows.

      the visceralness of the episodes has increased, it will be interesting to see what happens next season..something weird happened at the end of last season, and history got changed to where some weird aliens took power during WW2 and kept the war going so humanity could not develop as it did. at least, that is what I surmised from what I saw in the last episode

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:Are they trying to... by fitten · · Score: 1

      TNG was just the "let's see what kind of paradox we can have with time travel and/or alternate dimensions this week" series.

    6. Re:Are they trying to... by hikerhat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm. I thought Voyager was pretty good. But then, unlike most slashdotters, I'm not afraid of women.

    7. Re:Are they trying to... by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought the second season of TNG was pretty good, though I stand alone there. They had some of the best episodes...like when they first meet the Borg via Q. Then "Measure of a Man" about Data. Also the one about Prof. Moriarty was pretty good as I'm also a Sherlock Holmes fan.

      But I do agree, it got better after Rodenberry no longer had any control over it.

      But the crowning episodes in my mind was "The Inner Light" and "The Defector".

      Ok, I'm really showing my geek-ness now.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    8. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Janeway was a woman!?

    9. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TNG was great. It concentrated mostly on ethics and morality stuff.

      DS9 was much more interesting to me. Because they stay in place, there is a chance for political tensions to develop. Makes things a lot more interesting being able to fully explore relationships between ST cultures. In many ways it was the best trek for my tastes.

      Voyager sucked. Cheese factor over the top even for trek.

      Enterprise: let me explain this to you since you seem to find it so hard to understand: with time travel involved which is THE BASIS OF THE SERIES, you can't really have a fucked up timeline. There will be changes to it, but in the end I'm sure the timeline will be pretty much as we'd expect at the end of the show. Some things may happen earlier/later, but in general it will all work out. You and the other 5 guys that spout this on Slashdot every day are simply wrong.

      I'm tired of you folks saying they should pack it in. You're wrong, there are plenty of us that still enjoy trek. If you can find any way to produce sci fi that doesn't cost money and require marketing, lay it out there for us. With your limited imagination though, I doubt you could come up with much.

    10. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you nuts? 'First Contact' had more plot holes than... um... er... I'll get back to you on that.

      For example, why would the Borg travel to Earth and then go back in time, instead of going back in time and then travelling to Earth - when no-one can see them doing it and stop them?

      It's as bad as in Star Trek: Generations where Kirk and Picard have ALL ETERNITY to plot a cunning plan to foil Malcolm McDowell, and the plan they eventually come up with - bearing in mind McDowell has a gun and they're unarmed - is to hide behind a rock and surprise him, by stepping out slowly from behind said rock. Yeesh.

      Frankly, Star Trek IV : The One With The Whales did time travel better. And Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan was the best movie. :-p

    11. Re:Are they trying to... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      With your limited imagination though, I doubt you could come up with much.

      You're defending Enterprise, and then turn around and accuse somebody of "lack of imagination"?
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    12. Re:Are they trying to... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      How do you know he was talking about Janeway?

    13. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Enterprise is by no means perfect and I won't try to defend it in general. I'd say I enjoy it more than Voyager but less than TOS, TNG, and DS9. But I have to say the end of this last season did get a lot more interesting. And there have been plenty of episodes that I really liked.

      I wouldn't say it lacks imagination. In any event, whether Enterprise does or does not lack imagination or whether I am willing to defend it doesn't have much impact on whether the cretin I was accusing of no imagination has any.

      So I accuse YOU of faulty logic...

    14. Re:Are they trying to... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought DS9 was the best of all. With the previous series, they rarely had to deal with deep-seated hatred between two races. It also had a long plot-arc, something that was practially verboten in OS, and in TNG until 4th season.

      Most of all, I liked DS9 because it didn't try to paint Starfleeters as such perfect, moral people, and didn't try to paint an idea that all problems can be solved in a week (or two). And I was tired of all the moral pontificating that TNG had, it was a better show when they were OFF the Enterprise, like on the homeworlds of other races.

      Being on a station didn't seem to stop them from going places, they still had runabouts, went to numerous Gamma quadrant planets, and later, they did eventually get the Defiant.

    15. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek DS9: "To boldly go... no where. We're on a freaking space station people. We stay stationary, people... that's our job - to be dull!"

      Tell me in all cander have you ever actully watched Deep Space Nine besides a couple episodes from the first season, cause that retorich sounds verbatim like every uninformed opinion about DS9 that has ever been leveled. DS9, did more with the Star Trek universe than all the other series and movies combined. While TOS, TNG, and VOY were happy to continue the alien/anamoly of the week motif where everything is wrapped up in 44 minutes, Deep Space Nine had stories that changed the face of the Star Trek universe, and the lives of incredible regular and guest cast. In the process it created some of the best episodes of any TV series bar none.

      Okay so I admit that I am quite the DS9 fan, but I belive anyone who watches the series in its entierty will think as I and many others do. It is not the same as other Star Trek's nor does it try to be.

    16. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, all the series had women. Voyager was the only one with a woman in charge, maybe that has something to do with it?

    17. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was always this rumour going on about Janeway being a woman!

    18. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that Star Trek V was the best.

    19. Re:Are they trying to... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > when they first meet the Borg via Q.

      Yeah, that was good. The best episode of the second season, IMHO. Q is always fun, and there's always good chemistry between Patrick Stewart and John de Lancie.

      > Then "Measure of a Man" about Data.

      I'm sorry. This really could have been a great episode, done right. But the "legal regulations" for Data's arbitration board were so utterly contrived, so completely ludicrous, that they made no sense whatsoever. Legal proceedings are at least putatively designed to dispense justice, not to cause Cdr. William Riker and the rest of the Enterpise crew the maximum amount of angst possible. They totally destroyed my suspension of disbelief (and I can usually take a lot in the direction). It just didn't work.

      > Also the one about Prof. Moriarty was pretty good as I'm also a Sherlock Holmes fan.

      Meh. I'm a Holmes fan myself, but I didn't care for it much. Possibly because I'm allergic to holodeck episodes.

      > But the crowning episodes in my mind was "The Inner Light" and "The Defector".

      "The Defector" was pretty good, and "The Inner Light" was one of the finest pieces of SF ever produced for television. But neither is second season, so they can't be used to argue the quality of the second season.

      Chris Mattern

    20. Re:Are they trying to... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the quality of Star Trek has been pretty bad (which is a shame because it's a workable universe in which to place good stories, but they rarely ever did), DS9 was actually the best of the group (such as it was), because it had a continuing plot. By setting it on a space station, they could have things that happen in one episode affect the next episode. There was fallout from the decisions the crew made. (And the actors were generally better, in my opinion, on DS9, although I don't know what to attribute that to. Especially the actor for Sisko, who was originally a Shakesperian stage actor, and it shows in his delivery. When he'd get righteously indignant about something, you damn well *felt* it in his booming voice.)

      The problem with Voyager was that they destroyed what made it potentially a good series - the feel of being one ship alone without federation support, and needing to cut deals to make things work. The ship could just magically heal itself between episodes. It should have gotten more and more dingy and battle-scarred as the series went on, and the politcal fallout from deals the crew had to make should have had plotwise sweeping effects, but they just didn't.

      Enterprise could have been good from the setup - you get to watch how Earth took it's first steps toward becoming the Federation, before the Federation existed. But, I stopped watching in the middle of season 1 because the message, over and over and over, was always, "Doing nothing is the best option because when you act, you end up making huge mistakes." Unsurprisingly, that doesn't make for a good show. I mean, COME ON! The last episode I watched was the one where the challenge of the whole entire episode was that they had to try to figure out what one crew member's favorite *food* was, for crying out loud. That's not gripping television.

      The only reason I watched it was that it was the lead-in for Special Unit 2 - a show that was cheesy, but it reveled in it's cheesiness and had fun with it. It had more "soul" than the Star Treks did. And they cancelled it for no apparent reason. It was their third highest rated show, and had a way cheaper budget than Star Trek, and they cancelled it for no good reason and kept Star Trek.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    21. Re:Are they trying to... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      time travel involved which is THE BASIS OF THE SERIES

      I admit that I stopped watching Enterprise in the middle of the first season, but since when was time travel the BASIS of it? The BASIS was how Earth got started toward becoming the Federation. That they chose to make a time-travel plot come up a lot doesn't make it the basis for the show.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    22. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think moriarity qualifies as the "only respectable holodeck episode" - after all, he's an AI trying to _get off_ the holodeck. It isn't some completely-in-holodeck pointlessness (well, (spoiler) it is, in the end... but moriarity _believes_ he and his girlfriend have made it into the real world). The plot isn't some stupid storyline running on the holodeck - moriarity as a program created to "equal data" quickly puts paid to that.

    23. Re:Are they trying to... by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You got it wrong ...

      ST:TOS: To boldly go where no man has gone before ...
      ST:TNG To boldly go where no one has gone before (PC version)
      ST:DS9: To boldly stay in one place
      ST:VOY To boldly go and get completely lost

      And that's from before Enterprise, so I don't know where Enterprise would fit in. Perhaps `To bodly go and mess up the time-space continum?' :)

    24. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was Enterprise

    25. Re:Are they trying to... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I'll probably get slammed for it, but I quite liked Voyager. I quite liked the characters and although it was pretty high-and-mighty on the morals at times, the idea of the ship being totally on it's own was pretty nice.

      I hated DS9. I saw it as a blatent B5 ripoff, so I never bothered to watch more than the occasional episode when nothing else good was on TV.

      Never watched much of Enterprise.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    26. Re:Are they trying to... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like Next Generation is any better..."To boldy go where no man has gone before, have it attack us, and then escape at the last minute by reversing the polarity of something!"

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    27. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The temporal cold war is the over arching plot for the series not the birth of the federation.

    28. Re:Are they trying to... by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Make the Star Trek name absolute mud?

      "They" are not doing anything. Its a private, not for profit group that is doing this, not the Copyright holders. The copyright holders (Eugene Roddenberry, son of Gene) have come in toward the last, and given alot of leeway because he feels the project is exactly what his father would want. Additionally, many talented people from the movie industry have donated (or near donated) their time for the project. The producers are paying for the entire project out of their own pockets, with no method for recovering their expenses.

      It is not being sold, its given away. They plainly state that this is their interpretation of what years 4 and 5 would be. Its looks like a pretty cool project, and once the slashdotting is done on their site, you can download for FREE.

      This looks pretty damn cool to me, a fan based trilogy with decent acting, and very good visual effects, putting a new spin on Star Trek, while remaining fairly faithful to the original. They even state in their FAQ (link above) that they will NOT screw up the timeline.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    29. Re:Are they trying to... by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Star Trek DS9: "To boldly go... no where. We're on a freaking space station people.

      Ironically, I thought DS9 actually did more exploring than later TNG. On DS9, they were always taking the runabouts through the wormhole and actually going where no one had gone before, whereas the typical plotline for a TNG episode was "We're on a routine mission delivering toilet paper to the outpost on Squeblakron 12" followed by either an omnipotent alien playing games with them, some systems malfunction which almost destroys the ship, some virulent alien disease which turns the crew into howler monkeys, some goofball holodeck adventure, or Data getting reprogrammed/taken over just to give Brent Spiner an excuse to try to act. They never actually got around to discovering any new planets.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    30. Re:Are they trying to... by uid8472 · · Score: 1

      Star Trek Voyager: "To boldly promote the worst captain ever! Yeah, Janeway - you go, girl. Magically know stuff that no one else does. Cool, baby!!!"

      Oh, like Picard didn't do that all the time?

    31. Re:Are they trying to... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Star Trek Enterprise: "To boldly go and fuck up the entire timeline."

      Haven't you been paying attention? According to Enterprise, history NEEDS a dumbass.

    32. Re:Are they trying to... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      The point was that if the guy didn't know janeway was a woman, how did he guess that they were talking about janeway.
      Cluestick...

    33. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, talk about over analyzing a joke...

    34. Re:Are they trying to... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I would also like to put in my full agreement. I grew up on TNG and have seen all of TOS thanks to my Dads tapes. DS9 is my favorite though. I think the acting was by far the best. Avery Brooks and Nana Visitor actually had very complex charaters and sold them to me. Calm Meeny(sp?) was good too but they never did enough with him. I enjoyed Terry Farell and late Nichole Deboer as well. The show had a neat epic like quality that the other shows lacked. The DS9 plot actually built and managed to keep the episodes descrete at the same time. Clearly DS9 had much better writing then the other shows.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    35. Re:Are they trying to... by nempo · · Score: 1

      True, but as I've come to understand it it's the temporal cold war that leads to the birth of the federation. So in a sense, you're both right.

      --
      --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
    36. Re:Are they trying to... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think the time also has made us a little more bias. When we rewatch the older series we still get the feelings of the time. Over time we tend to have more good memories then bad ones.

      My first real experience with Trek was TNG So I Got very installed with it. And still I will watch it from the reruns trying to recapture the same feelings I had in 3rd grade.

      After I Watch TNG for a while I started watching TOS. Needless to say it was lesser quality the TNG but still it was better then most of the other stuff at the time.

      DS9 Came out at my peak of watching TV So although I felt it lacked some of the excitement that the Others had. It was still a good show. After watching the reruns I started enjoying it more.

      Voyager, by then I was in collage and didn't have much time to seriously watch the show and get more involved with the characters. So now it felt more predictable.

      Enterprise now that I am working full time and I don't watch much TV. While I do get an episode I don't always get them in order so the plot is not always smooth to me.

      But I think if I was 10 years old and started watching Enterprise I would think it is the best of the treks and after I watch the others I would probably point out a lot of the problems with them compared to Enterprise. It is the same old situation where people go Todays Music is not as good as our generation.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    37. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But like many Slashdotters, the only taste you have is in your mouth.

    38. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      When did time travel become the basis of the series? The first episode, Broken Bow, had Klang being chased by Suliban, under the influence of some unnamed individual from the future who had given the Suliban technology for genetic enhancements.

      This is part of the temporal (time travel) cold war. The incident with Klang was not supposed to happen yet, so the show begins with a deviation from the timeline.

      Therefore all following events should be expected to diverge somewhat from the cannon.

    39. Re:Are they trying to... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      My question is:

      what the hell is Guinin all about in that episode? they never really explain how or why Q and her hate each other and why Q believes her to be dangerous.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    40. Re:Are they trying to... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      actually, that is the second Holodeck moriarity episode. the one they are referring to is when Jordy and Data create Moriarity.

      the one where they deal with Barkly and his holo-adiction is good as well, and that one where Riker is lead to believe he is captain of the enterprise, then thinks he has been captured by the romulans, then finds out that it is actually some fake looking alien child in a cave set up by its mother for its entertainment is kinda ok.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    41. Re:Are they trying to... by connorbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would go so far as to say that whether or not it was originally meant as a B5 knockoff, DS9 had some of the most intense plotting and intricate character relationships of the entire Trek canon. Far from being Picard the Boy Scout or Kirk the Adventurer, Sisko was a deeply conflicted man who did some very, very bad things at times to try to make things come out right. I think if you want to look at what Star Trek always should have been, you have to look at DS9; it was the only show where some of the supporting characters were as important or more important than some of the main characters.

      That said, Voyager had one thing going for it: if I was going to take any ship in the Trek canon, it would be the Voyager. Of all the ships on the show, that one is the closest to indestructible...

    42. Re:Are they trying to... by APDent · · Score: 3, Funny

      I enjoyed Terry Farell and late Nichole Deboer as well.

      I assume you mean " later Nicole deBoer". IMDB certainly seems to think she's still alive.

    43. Re:Are they trying to... by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and then James T. Kirk, galactic hero, Captain of the most storied vessel in Starfleet history, arbiter of peace between the Federation and the Klingons, a man who literally and singlehandedly saved Earth numerous times...

      ...falls down the stairs and is buried in an unmarked grave on an uninhabited planet right after the Enterprise is destroyed for the fourth time in a Star Trek movie.

      Let's give 'em all a big round of applause, folks!

      And Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan was the best movie.

      Agreed, with ST IV and ST VI in second and third place. :)

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    44. Re:Are they trying to... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I think what bothers people about all the messed up timelines in Enterprise is NOT that the timewars stuff screwed with it. It's the bait and switch.
      Most of us were expecting a show about the trek before the federation, before romulans or klingons, and no phasers, and so on.
      And besides the continuity issues that could plausably explained by intertemporal manipulation, we have a few other glaring issues, like distances. Places that were months away in TOS are barely weeks away in Enterprise, even though they supposedly don't have anywhere near the speeds in TOS.
      I am a fan of time travel stories in any SF background, but in Enterprise they mix-up how it effects things way to much. And really while the time-war plots COULD explain the way to early elements, this is still fairly obviously a retro-fit of the situation.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    45. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was no bait and switch.

      Enterprise is progressing towards the birth of the Federation.

      We're getting to see first meetings... tellarians, andorians, klingons, romulans (though not shown). That is exactly what I expected from the series, and it's been a lot of fun seeing that aspect of it. The whole "expanse" arc I wasn't hot on to begin with since it really diverged from that, but they worked it out if you watched last season.

      I don't know why you think they shouldn't have phasers.

      As far as distances between things in Enterprise vs. TOS: ST:TOS made very little effort to get distances and facts for that matter correct. That really only started to happen with TNG... Sternbach, Okuda... I think we have to give them some leeway there. It's a hard problem dealing with less than "careful" certainly not hard sci fi and keeping it convincing to a more aware audience than was expected with TOS.

      Read through the Encyclopedia, you'll see even the experts can't resolve huge inconsistencies even within TOS itself.

    46. Re:Are they trying to... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Well phasers shouldn't exist yet because in they were brand spanking new when the NCC1701 set out under Pike.
      Klingons and romulans were newly discoverd in Kirk's time. And by the movies quite some distance away at max warp contrast with the much slower speeds given for Enterprise.
      The bait and switch was simple. Most expected a story that took place BEFORE any of this happened, and with much lower tech.
      And yes, Trek is famous for anoying inconsistancies that don't jibe when any anlysis is done. However Enterprise takes it to a whole new level in places, not all of which can be explained by a temporal conflict.
      All that said I don't really hate the show, in fact I find it an o.k. show, I'm just dissapointed that these unfortunate elements exist. I would honestly like to have seen a trully pre-tos series, not one that meerly takes place before tos, but has all the same things plus borg and one new arch-villian race.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    47. Re:Are they trying to... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Um, all the series had women. Voyager was the only one with a woman in charge, maybe that has something to do with it?

      That's the entire point. Star trek has always been male geek jerkoff fantasy. The women were submissive, dressed in scant outfits, and didn't really matter (and when they went against the men, they were either ignored, overruled or proven wrong), which definitely was the way I liked my women when I was 16 years old.

      DS9 made a first attempt at making women count as more than playtoys, but didn't really succeed all that well since all the positions of power were still men, and the strongest, most mentally-balanced, female character, dax, actually had the mind of a man. Then voyager came around and had two strong female characters who were in positions of power, could not be overruled by men (being cut off from the male admiralty), and rarely dressed to show off their body. That made it more adult, but at the same time, less suitable jerk-off material. They tried to remedy it with adding insecure, voluptuous and powerless seven of nine, but the damage was already done. Even making seven fall in love with the most powerful man on the ship couldn't fix the image voyager gathered in the first season.

      At least the original series was shameless about its deferential treatment of women, to the point where it became a running gag, which made it a lot less harmful. But TNG was a lot more sneaky about the misogynistic undertones, and it really started bothering me when I grew up and realised women were individual human beings who actually had thoughts of their own.

      I know, I know, it's just fiction, but it influences the way people perceive the world anyway, so it does matter.

    48. Re:Are they trying to... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Basically I treat TOS as a completely separate thing because there are *so* many inconsistencies between is and the later Star Treks. Hell in TOS Zephren Cockraine was black.

    49. Re:Are they trying to... by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      Besides the 24th Century High School crap where everyone falls in love with everyone else, I saw nothing wrong with DS9. It was a lot more raw and somewhat more realistic than TNG. You had lots of different races working with each other, and you even got to see a darker side of the Federation with Section 31. I can see a new movie based on exposing them.

      Voyager: did you see the episode where most of the senior staff was assimilated? Damn Janeway looked old.

      Enterprise: Decent actors, yet the most horrible Trek show evar. Just the fact that the show is set 150 years before TOS stinks of a Star Wars ripoff. They could have probably asked for ideas and/or scripts from one the dozens of paperback writers and got a show worth watching, or even asked for ideas from the fans. Star Trek Elite Force the Series anyone?

    50. Re:Are they trying to... by ProKras · · Score: 1

      Any chance this new work will make it into the canon?

    51. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, the problem with Janeway wasn't that she was a non-jerkoff-material woman, but that her character was not convincing. I'm not sure how much of it was in the acting/directing part and how much in the writing, but the way she would either answer everyone far too quickly (without seeming to think) or alternately say nothing and stare with her mouth open. It's especially funny watching several episodes in a row and seeing the exact same expression, almost as if they had used the same footage...

      Admittedly, I've only seen the first couple of seasons, and things did seem a bit better toward the end of the second season.

    52. Re:Are they trying to... by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

      While I too enjoyed voyager; I would have to say that in the grand scheme of blunders, selfishness, and generaly stuboorness endangering the 'crew'- janeway was the worst captain. Examples:

      1-On my; something is attacking and killing the borg, we'd better give the borg weapons that will help them kill these things before trying to make first contact with them and finding out that they just don't like the borg and the rest of the galaxy is fine
      2-Hey Q, you say you'll send the whole ship home, and all I have to do is have sex with you, once? Naw, I think I'll let crew members die over the umpteen years it's going to take us, instead of sacrificing my dignity for the good of the many
      3-Lets mess with the timeline in order to get the crew home, 'ahead of schedule' even though it completely anhialates a future that diden't seem so bad.

      It's funny, because I watched voyager the first time, and the glaring problems with the janeway charecter did not stand out to me; only upon watching replays did I start to realise what an assanine charecter she was.

      --
      -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
    53. Re:Are they trying to... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Yeah? And why do you blame TOS for that being inconsistent? It's the fault of rick fucking berman and the casting people for first contact.

      Rick fucking Berman and the current crop of so-called Star Trek writers don't give a damn about Star Trek. They want to produce an action adventure space story which will make money. Does it totally fuck with WELL ESTABLISHED Trek history? "Who cares?" they'll say, "We don't give a shit. If some pimply faced moron wants to object, he can just kiss my ass."

      This is becaus they do not LIKE their original fans, they are catering to the masses who know Star Trek only marginally.

      Anyone who attempts to create something new in Trek, especially if it's new Old stuff, is OBLIGED to make sure it doesn't blatantly contradict anything. And, since that's sometimes highly inconvenient, to at least build in an explanation, or make the contradicition as light weight as possible.

      Rick Fucking Berman and company didn't even bother to lift one finger and remotely TRY. They maliciously said "We don't care about Trek, so NO ONE should care about Trek. We'll do whatever we fucking like, call it Star Trek to get the extra ratings (and extra $$$!) and the public will LIKE it, because that's what we TELL 'EM to like."

      The examples are too numerous to even begin to site comprehensively. I've only seen episode 1 of Enterprise, after which I declared the entire searies Dead and non-canonical. From just that episode I observe the following:

      Klingons were not discovered until much later, after the Federation was formally established.

      Transporter technology in TOS required the people being transported to HOLD STILL. It wasn't until later that they could move, much less RUN, while being transported.

      Additionally, transporters were not invented by the Federation until after there WAS a federation.And I'm talking a real one, not just "Us and the Vulcans"

      For that matter, VULCANS SHOW NO EMOTION. They just don't. Okay? Sure, Spock did it several times, but he was a half-breed. A full-blood scouts-honor VULCAN does NOT look annoyed like that. No.

      On the Enterprise D there is a display of previous versions of the Enterprise, right back to the original navy ship. The one from the time period that Archer is supposed to be in is not shaped like that.

      Sensor technology should not have been good enough to detect what SPECIES different life forms on a ship so distant were. Detect life? Sure. How many individual life signs? I doubt it? Species? NO WAY.

      The list is nearly endless. And that's ONE episode.

      I am not a rabid Star Trek fan. I've read only a couple dozen of the books, and I have only a slight familiarity with many episodes from TOS, and I've missed some episodes of TNG, lots from DS9. (Voyager I started skimming after I realized it was mostly crap.) I am not particularly zealous, but I do insist on one thing: INTERNAL CONSISTENCY. It's one of the big appeals of Star Trek: Maybe it's hard, but you can explain how almost all important elements (especially technology) are consistent with all others.

      If I, a relatively calm and disinterested Star Trek fan, can see such glaring problems with Enterprise, surely the real fans can as well. I'm sure there are many "fans" of Enterprise... a bunch of morons who like watching WB and FOX shows. True, real star trek fans of give a slight damn about the series just don't like Enterprise.

      Perhaps a few have come to terms with it and treat it as a nice, good series which has nothing really to do with Star Trek. I salute those people. Me, I can't seperate them in my head.

      I know of no Star Trek fans who think Enterprise is good Trek. A good show? Some. Good Trek? No fucking way.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    54. Re:Are they trying to... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of you folks saying they should pack it in. You're wrong, there are plenty of us that still enjoy trek.

      I agree with you. The average slashdotter reminds me of the Comic Book Guy on the Simpsons (in more than one way, not so ironically) in that they take the attitude that "Star Trek owes me for watching". Reminiscent of the attack against Itchy and Scratchy, where Bart points out that they had provided years of free entertainment, and all the Comic Book Guy could say is "Worst Episode Ever".

      The the producers didn't take chances, it would be boring. If you take chances, you are are going to fall on your face from time to time. We can all argue what is good and what is falling on your face, but the fact is, I would rather watch the worst Star Treks (Voyager, IMHO) than watch most other TV shows. You can always turn the TV off.

      I think Rick screwed up Enterprise in the 2nd season, and somewhat redeemed himeself in the 3rd. The concept is valid, the acting is acceptible, and for God's sake, the Andoreans are just too fucking cool ;) Gotta love those antennas.... I for one, will wait it out, and probably bitch about the bad episodes like everyone else, but I DONT think they should just quit. They should keep the concept alive, try new things, and keep in touch with their fan base.

      It appears this independent version of years 4 and 5 may be just the tip of the iceburg, and we may find in 3 or 4 years, the best "Star Treks" started out as fan based concepts that the producers bought out and ran with.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    55. Re:Are they trying to... by fbform · · Score: 1

      by reversing the polarity of something!"

      That "something" would be the "tachyon field generator". And the scriptwriters were hard at work fiddling with the polarity of the technobabble modulator.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    56. Re:Are they trying to... by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      OK, OK, I admit it. I watched Firefly on Fox and I liked it.

    57. Re:Are they trying to... by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      That said, Voyager had one thing going for it: if I was going to take any ship in the Trek canon, it would be the Voyager. Of all the ships on the show, that one is the closest to indestructible...

      And just think of all the things you could do if you had infinite shuttlecraft at your disposal...

    58. Re:Are they trying to... by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Agreed, except i couldn't astand Nana. Her character was so repulsive to me, and i found her the only thing i didn't like about DS9. Avery was a good actor, though i didn't like when they had his character not feel bad about the murder. Still OK, but at that point the character went way down on my scale.

      The best was probably Terry or Andrew Robinson. But most of the actors and character were very good.

    59. Re:Are they trying to... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      I have watched and liked Buffy, Angel and Firefly myself. The Simpsons, Futurama, and Family Guy, while I'm at it. Not to mention Jack of All Trades and a few assorted things like that.

      This doesn't make me one of those people who watch WB and FOX shows and like them. The shows I have named may have aired on those networks but (with the caveat that an argument to thecontrary could be made in the case of the Simpsons) they are not Fox Shows and they are not WB Shows.

      Fox shows are base crap aimed at such a low point in society that it's a wonder the producers don't commit suicide. They are so devoid of any form of cleverness that the level of brain activity in any room drops dramatically the instant any prime-time Fox show is switched on.

      WB shows are wishy-washy or derivative or both, they are humdrum repetition of formulaic drama plots which manage to surive solely because their audiences cycle so fast that no one viewer sees more than one or two of the shows before s/he grows out of them.

      These things are the meat and potatos of the masses, the same masses (or at least the children of the same masses) who said Star Trek was stupid and just for nerds--which of course is a synonym for worthless.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    60. Re:Are they trying to... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      I was reading respectfully, and at the end, and evil thought came stealing into my cynical mind:

      his girlfriend is reading this, aint't she? :)

    61. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a real fan, you sir, are an idiot. Unlike you I have seen every episode, read many of the books, Love Star Trek, so that makes me a real fan by any definition.

      I like Enterprise. Not my favorite. I like it. DS9 is the best. But Enterprise is making a solid effort. It is not producing internal consistency beyond what one would expect when time travel is a central component of the series.

      The early meeting with Klingons is totally in line with the temporal cold war.

      It wouldn't have happened unless there were time travellers intervening. Period.

      That makes it completely "canonical," at least insofar as time travel often has consequences in trek that change the past (and sometimes the affect future in significant ways).

      I don't know why this is so hard for people to understand.

      Anyway, if you think that the current producers don't make a concerted effort to get internal consistency, leagues beyond what had ever been attempted before in a sci-fi tv series, you are simply misinformed.

    62. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Agree 100% on the Andorians and other species... it's been fun seeing the initial meetings. I was a little worried about "The Expanse" story arc since it would take them away from those types of things, but it turned out the andorians followed them in...

      It's cool that we get to see more of them than we have in any other Trek, outside of the books (the new DS9 series has brought in some Andorian characters).

    63. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever considered switching to decaf?

    64. Re:Are they trying to... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      but it turned out the andorians followed them in...

      If you remember the scene where the time traveling guy shows Archer the founding of the Federation, there were Andorians, Vulcans and Humans there (may have been others, I just noticed the blue heads). Ok, the time traveler is a little weak, but still, I like what they are doing with the Andorians in the show, and the Andorians showing up at the last minute actually shocked me. Wasn't expecting it at all.

      I also like the way they are showing the hostility that would exist between the Vulcans and the Humans. They may have overplayed it a hair in the first season, but if you think about it, it would be there. With the Vulcans holding back info (probably for good reason, but with an arrogent attitude) I can see some hostility.

      I also like the fact that they are willing to show Archer doing stuff that he should NOT be doing, willing to suffocate the guy in the air lock, etc. They should him as a bastard from time to time, when he needs to be, which would be pretty real being isolated in space trying to save a planet...

      The problems I have had with Enterprise was mainly the second season, and mainly just bad scripts. I would find half way through the episode, I didn't care if they lived or not ;) This year started slow, but got a lot better, IMHO. I could nit pick it to death, but I choose to overlook the shortcomings instead. Its easier to bitch than have hope for better soon (as demonstrated here on /.) but I will keep hoping for better scripts.

      Oh yea, and Rick appears to be taken aback because more people think Hoshi is sexy, rather than Tupal, but he should just let the audience decide and write to it. Me, I think they are both pretty damn hot :)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    65. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sexist! It's "To boldy go where no one has gone before"!

    66. Re:Are they trying to... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      I like Enterprise. Not my favorite. I like it. DS9 is the best. But Enterprise is making a solid effort. It is not producing internal consistency beyond what one would expect when time travel is a central component of the series.

      Internal to that one series maybe.

      That makes it completely "canonical," at least insofar as time travel often has consequences in trek that change the past (and sometimes the affect future in significant ways).

      Even if you were right, the then-future is not the now-past. In TOS/TNG/DS9/etc the past was one way, in Enterprise the present is a different way. The trouble is that the Enterprise future is going to totally obliterate the TOS present and future, because it's based on a different past. This Enterprise stuff therefore can't be the past of (say) TOS, because TOS would not be the future of Enterprise.

      This means Enterprise could be a perfectly good past to a series which has never yet aired, and if they wanted to do that why didn't they just make a new series and say "This isn't Star Trek (but it's really Star Trek)"? Only one reason: Marketing and the franchise dollers.

      Anyway, if you think that the current producers don't make a concerted effort to get internal consistency, leagues beyond what had ever been attempted before in a sci-fi tv series, you are simply misinformed.

      I'm sure they spend gobs of effort making Enterprise consistent with Enterprise--they just don't spend a damn minute even looking to see what else it breaks in past series'.

      If I sound bitter, angry, and generally hostile it's only because I am. Star Trek as a complete multi-series saga has been royally fucked for no good reason, and that pisses me off just a tick.

      I notice, incidentally, that you did not comment on whether Enterprise was good Trek. So tell me, as a Star Trek fan: Apart from it being (apparantly, according to you) a passingly decent Sci Fi show, and apart from the fact that it disregards canonical fact right and left, is it good Trek?

      Do the episodes give you that Trekky feeling and make you go "Wow" at things that aren't just action? Do you gasp for breath at any insights you now and then gain on society?

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    67. Re:Are they trying to... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Err, the problem with Janeway wasn't that she was a non-jerkoff-material woman, but that her character was not convincing.

      Indeed. If they'd made her more like Rachael Garret, THEN we'd have a captain to be proud of. Instead, we got Janeway who got all blurry-eyed at the slightest little thing Kes did. Oh, and her biggest moral dillema was whether or not to treat the Doctor like a Real Boy^H^H^H Person.

    68. Re:Are they trying to... by connorbd · · Score: 1

      heh, that too...

      All good points on that page, but hey. The Intrepid class would still be a pretty tough ship anyway...

    69. Re:Are they trying to... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the time travel is ONE aspect of the show, I do not agree that it was the basis of the series. It was one TOOL used to help the basis along. Saying it was the basis of the story would be like saying Babylon 5 was a show where rotational intertia was the basis of the show, because that's how the station got it's gravity.

      They could have told the story of the start of the federation without using that tool. It was not crucial to the story, and I agree with previous posters who say it was detremental to include it.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    70. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Enterprise is often good trek, more often than Voyager. It is rarely as good as TNG and almost never as good as DS9. It is better sci fi than TOS, and they try a lot harder than TOS.

      Take any one of the Andorian episodes. Or the last several of this season in the Expanse. And a smattering of other episodes from first and second season.

      You are wrong that they disregard canon. No trek since TNG has disregarded canon, I challenge you to show deviations that cannot be explained away by effects of intervention from the future. And I think it is still trek (you will notice though that Star Trek does NOT appear in the title credits) since by and large I believe things will line up. You can think of the goal of the show to introduce things that could REALLY screw up the timeline, but the challenge is to get the broad strokes of history right. That are basically fighting to keep the timeline we know and love.

      If you really want to like trek I recommend that you take a fresh look at the series from this point of view. The main problem I have with Enterprise is unrelated to these kinds of non-problems. It is more that lack of complex interpersonal and interspecies relationships that made DS9 and TNG great shows. I think Enterprise can get there though (and sometimes they get there), so I keep watching.

      Some things will necessarily happen a bit earlier or in slightly different ways. With time travel that is to be expected.

      As to whether I've gasped for breath at any great insights in Trek... not really, not ever. It isn't that level of entertainment for me. Most of the real "morality play" type stuff is pretty transparent to me.

      That said, I hear lots of cool ideas, and echoes of my own thoughts and things I've read elsewhere, and occasionally a writer is clever enough to keep me on the edge of my seat, or at least can outthink me for a few minutes here and there. That is all I ask from trek. And it rarely disappoints (the steaming piece of crap that was Voyager, ah... I would be happy if that had never happened to the timeline...)

      The key to happiness in life is adjusting your expectations to match reality.

    71. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Zephram Cochrane was not black... I seem to remember him showing up in the original show with that sparky light entity on some planet. I don't remember that guy being black.

      Daystrom of the "Daystrom Institute" was black though. Maybe you're confusing them?

    72. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Well I take Enterprise at face value not from the marketing hype I didn't really pay a lot of attention to before the show started.

      No running plot lines in the show make any sense without time travel. The temporal cold war IS the basis of the show. It runs through just about every episode. All the so-called inconsistencies /.'ers bitch about are all related to deleterious affects of it.

      However, if they wanted to make the idea of the show more understable, the could call it "Enterprise: Fight for the Future" or some such. The feeling I get from the show is that there is a future, the one we all understand from other Trek shows, which is in danger. The whole point of Enterprise, is, in the face of rampant attacks from time travellers on the timeline, to by and large preserve the future that we are expecting to see.

      Time travel is not just one aspect. Your rotational inertia comparison is just not right. If I'd said Enterprise is based on the transporters not working good your analogy would be correct. That's not what I said though.

      The temporal cold war is the basis of the series. If you don't think so, you're just not paying attention.

      Now could they have told the story of the early federation without time travel? Yes, but they could NOT have told a story about the early beginnings of the federation under attack by time travellers from the future without time travel.

    73. Re:Are they trying to... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well DS9 was heavily influenced by the excellent works of JMS in Babylon 5. It started basically as the typical star trek technobubble series and as then over the time lots of ideas of the far superior B5 went into DS9... In my opinion while DS9 was good B5 basically was the only sci fi series in the recent past which didnt insult the brains of the viewers.

    74. Re:Are they trying to... by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      And in the first episode, her ship falling apart around her, she fixes her damned hair.

    75. Re:Are they trying to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voyager: did you see the episode where most of the senior staff was assimilated? Damn Janeway looked old.

      That's because she is. Now stop wanking your willy at her.

    76. Re:Are they trying to... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      Now could they have told the story of the early federation without time travel? Yes, but they could NOT have told a story about the early beginnings of the federation under attack by time travellers from the future without time travel.

      The show was not billed as being about time travel. It was billed as being about the start of the federation. And that was the show I was attempting to watch. But a show about preserving the future of the federation is not a show about the start of the federation.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    77. Re:Are they trying to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      It is what it is... this has been the plotline from the beginning of the show. Do you really give that much weight to marketing hype which came before the first episode aired? I didn't give it any weight.

      In essence, we are seeing the birth of the federation... lots of first meetings with different species/cultures.

      I can't imagine any marketing literature which would say "see the birth of the federation unfold without effect of time travel"

      Maybe you would be happier if you took the show at face value, rather than being upset it's not the show you would write given the chance.

    78. Re:Are they trying to... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      "If you really want to like trek I recommend that you take a fresh look at the series from this point of view."

      They screwed up the technology. This is a fact. I am no longer interested. All I see is bad and worse. Anything which might otherwise be considered 'good' is also bad, becase it will potentially draw people away from the "Enterprise is bad" camp.

      "And it rarely disappoints (the steaming piece of crap that was Voyager, ah... I would be happy if that had never happened to the timeline...)"

      Voyager I can forgive. I really didn't like it, 90% of the time, but I can fotgive it. Why? It is low impact. Few things they did there have long-lasting reprecussions. So they did it badly? Who cares. It makes no difference to the Star Trek saga as a whole. Enterprise has been chopping up reality for itself *and all star trek* since day one. That is not cool.

      "The key to happiness in life is adjusting your expectations to match reality."

      I prefer adjusting reality to my preference. It's less fun in some ways, and more fun in others.

      If that sounds sort of beligerent, look at it this way: I envision reality as I think it Should be, and operate as if that is reality. If the world aligns to my views, so much the better. In my world, there is no such thing as Enterprise.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    79. Re:Are they trying to... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      Maybe you would be happier if you took the show at face value

      Expecting that the show will suck still doesn't make it suck less.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  10. WMV by Jesrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WMV is a tool of the Devil.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  11. The mirrors, they're all dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    if you haven't downloaded it yet, better wait awhile. any other mirrors out there?

    1. Re:The mirrors, they're all dead, Jim. by ziggy_zero · · Score: 5, Funny

      All of the mirrors must have all been wearing red shirts.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    2. Re:The mirrors, they're all dead, Jim. by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      No, but there is a Mirror Mirror

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    3. Re:The mirrors, they're all dead, Jim. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The webserver crashed. How long to fix it?"

      "Six Hours, sir."

      "You have three. Make them count."

      "Maybe I can reverse the polarity on the apache config file!"

      "You do that."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  12. New, horrible acting? by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did they get Steven Segal as the captain, whose mission it is to explore strange new worlds, seek out new life and BEAT THE CRAP out of their civilizations? (fade-in Segal beating the crap out of a green alien dude with his bare hands, then saying "Where the hell is that chick who jumped out of the cake?!")

    Ok, I admit it, I'm a troll.. I just can't help it. I like negative karma ;p

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:New, horrible acting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop sniffing glue.

    2. Re:New, horrible acting? by Banner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, But you're a very funny Troll! :-D

    3. Re:New, horrible acting? by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 0

      The only way I am funny is smelling. ;o

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    4. Re:New, horrible acting? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      You thought you were trolling. Really, you just accurately described just about every episode of the original series. In fact, the only difference I see is that Shatner could make a fight believable. He could make me care. Segal makes me want to see what's playing on the radio.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  13. download, unzip, xine :) by timothy · · Score: 2

    The trailer at any rate works fine for me that way (using Knoppix-based Debian install). Xine complains that my processor isn't fast enough*, but that seems to me a family matter and nothing the authorities have any right to pass comment upon.

    timothy

    *And they mean the one on my desk, a VIA Epia-M 900. Probably right, too, but the trailer played acceptably for me ...

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  14. Whew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Capn' I don't think the mirrors will hold, even by rerouting auxillary power!

    Seriously, all mirrors were slower than death already while the post was in the Mysterious Future...

    1. Re:Whew... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. BUT
      If we just reconfigure the main subtransroute matrix, we can increase output 10x on our main destabilizer conduit and get everybody connected.....
      Of course that will burn out our main deflector dish!

    2. Re:Whew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn in your Star Trek fanclub membership badge now!!! You forgot to "invert polarities!"

    3. Re:Whew... by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! Don't you know anything? You can't just reverse polarity willy-nilly like that. You've got to "modulate the frequency"!

  15. zip ? by selderrr · · Score: 4, Funny

    what's the point in zipping a WMV file ??? I can't imagine getting more than 1% gain, probably even a negative compression effect...

    1. Re:zip ? by juuri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You get anywhere from 2-5% compression depending on codec used. When something is downloaded a couple thousand or even hundred thousand times that little amounts of savings can add up to a huge overall savings in total bandwidth.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    2. Re:zip ? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      The point is so you can't watch it as you D/L :)

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    3. Re:zip ? by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Informative

      Someone already said this, but I'll expound

      If you don't zip then people can stream it off your server, if they end up watching it multiple time then that's additional bandwidth off your server, if you zip it they have to DL it and are more likely to just remember they have it localy and rewatch it from there.

      zipping seemed stupid to me till I found this out.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    4. Re:zip ? by bozoman42 · · Score: 1

      The other reason to zip single compressed files is to offer integrity validation via zip's CRC.

    5. Re:zip ? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

      "what's the point in zipping a WMV file ???"

      Probably to fix some stupidness with Microsoft's Media Player. Let's say you link to a .WMV file that's 100 megabytes. When you click on it, WMP fires up and sits there and does NOTHING until the whole 100 meg file is down. It appears to be frozen, and you have NFI how much you have left to XFER. If you try to start another media file that WMP monopolizes, it just kills the transfer as opposed to opening a new window. If you put it in ZIP format, you know how long it'll take to get, and you don't have WMP sitting around in limbo. Pretty lame, huh?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:zip ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like evidence the original codec is not up to scratch...

    7. Re:zip ? by zebs · · Score: 1

      Well that'd save on their bandwidth a fairbit then wouldn't it?

    8. Re:zip ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I stop the download after 3 MB, because I recognize that the movie is pure garbage - that's bandwidth saving.

    9. Re:zip ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Which is why I always wondered why movie trailers often have saving disabled.

      It's a good thing for people to watch them more than once, but why do the sites want to pay extra for it?

  16. Aren't we all looking forward to by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1

    the Star Wreck movie?

    1. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Babylon 5 ships vs. Star Trek ships in battle == nerd nirvana.

    2. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way dork wad, everyone knows that Star Wars has the the superior ships. A Super Star Destroyer could so defeat the Enterprise, Enterprise A, Enterprise B, Enterprise C, Enterprise D, Enterprise E, the NX-01, and a vorlon planet killer, the White Star, the Black Star, and Mr. Bester... ALL AT THE SAME TIME!!!!

    3. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "the Star Wreck movie?"

      That movie is in perpetual development. If Duke Nukem Forever ever comes out, Star Wreck will be the joke that takes its place.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, +1 Insightful!!

    5. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1

      Say what you want, but I'll be watching Star Wreck on my GNU/HURD before they release Linux 3.

    6. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you but Linux is already on version 10 SEE

    7. Re:Aren't we all looking forward to by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1

      Show me even a Slackware 5, and I'll believe that.

  17. Re:Obligatory by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    Yeah but Star Trek had an interracial kiss before the soaps :)

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  18. Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all of my downloads just stoped form mirror 2 I assume it just got slashdoted :D So has anyone set up a mirror or at least a torrent for this?

  19. I thought I didn't understand slashdotting... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    I went to Mirror 1. The page loaded quickly, as did the main page. I got confused. This was Star Trek and on Slashdot. I initiated the download. I got 0.1 KB / sec.

    *phew*

    The world hadn't gone crazy after all.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:I thought I didn't understand slashdotting... by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      Wow, my download seems fast now..I'm getting 1.3 KB/sec! :-)

      Or so it claims..

  20. Erzatz Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But can they ever match the horror that is Turk Trek? http://www.thewavemag.com/pagegen.php?pagename=art icle&articleid=22646

  21. Ob. quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scotty, beam me down a zipped WMV file!
    Sir, I just doanna 'ave the power!

    Bones, what the hell happend to those mirrors?
    They're dead, Jim.
    Can't you bring them back up?
    Dammit, Jim, I'm a doctor not a .torrent!

  22. Ah... by sH4RD · · Score: 1

    Ah....let the crazies (that is: uber-Trekkies -- is that a word? should be) make a Star Trek, and what do you know! It's better than "Enterprise"!

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
  23. Not the first maybe not the worst acting :-) by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter Starship Exeter This one is done with a different ship in the The Original Series universe. Makes the change of the crew actors a bit more plausible.

    1. Re:Not the first maybe not the worst acting :-) by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      oh my god.

      At least that isn't as bad as the Star Wars Holiday Special.

  24. WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link in parent post is WORSE THAN GOATSE!!

    1. Re:WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a great song, and nearly as good a video. A classic.

      Not that I can watch it at that link, since it just asks for a password. :-)

    2. Re:WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The link worked fine until mr. negative nillie claimed it was worse than goatse and every /.er clicked on the link out of habit.

  25. Overnet/Edonkey links by Syre · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Overnet/Edonkey links by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

      Your donkeylinks are somehow broken ...

    2. Re:Overnet/Edonkey links by MoonStarr · · Score: 1

      <a href='ed2k://file|StarTrekNewVoyagesEpisodeTrailer .zip|1942862|f8842c742ca65df24fbc137570006dd8|'>pp p</a>

    3. Re:Overnet/Edonkey links by Syre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, for some reason /. replaced the | with 7C and got rid of the //.

      Here are the links (copy paste to your browser and they will trigger the d/l if you have the app installed and configured properly).

      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages Teaser.zip|16636412|5efe45b60842aaa3f4f7538ed5b1e0 90|
      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages act_1.zip|21745192|c6d53b71f5a2af3a4b13af8d2dee534 6|
      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages act_2.zip|20632051|03eaa80b912ed09dd08931ba9923c4a 1|
      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages act_3.zip|16583160|28d32240a5eaf1e0e82c620481a49f0 5|
      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages act_4.zip|25560599|7026a2d4a34510638debade9bad7315 a|
      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages Episode_Trailer.zip|1942862|f8842c742ca65df24fbc13 7570006dd8|
      ed2k://|file|Star Trek New Voyages Series_Trailer.zip|5361254|9d6eaa1f47a082374b528bc 2f9e94578|

    4. Re:Overnet/Edonkey links by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here are the links (copy paste to your browser and they will trigger the d/l if you have the app installed and configured properly).

      After removing the spaces Slash inserted into them of course. :-) The forum code is a bitch sometimes, but at least you didn't stumble upon the lameness filter. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. The crowd is wrong, as usual by njdj · · Score: 5, Insightful
    worse acting (believe it or not),

    Trashing Shatner's and Nimoy's acting shows you're really sophisticated, one of the in-crowd. Like EVERYbody agrees they can't act, right?


    Stop being a mindless sheep. There is nothing wrong with Nimoy's acting, and little to complain about in Shatner's. They're not Alec Guinness, but their performances in the original Startrek were perfectly adequate.

    1. Re:The crowd is wrong, as usual by isorox · · Score: 1

      What he meant was any fan of Trek will be an amazing actor, better even then Shatner, Nimoy, Stewart and Frakes all rolled into one.

    2. Re:The crowd is wrong, as usual by notyou2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the problem was his acting... I think it was his director's directing. The director(s?) couldn't possibly let him play Kirk the way he did, unless that was how they wanted things to come out.

    3. Re:The crowd is wrong, as usual by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is nothing wrong with Nimoy's acting

      I saw an interview with him once where he said that whenever the camera stopped rolling, he would spontaneously burst into laughter or start crying. Maintaining Spock's emotionless facade took a lot of effort for him, he couldn't keep it up for long. Hell they had to write a "Data goes crazy" episode every now and again, I reckon that was just to keep Brent Spiner sane.

    4. Re:The crowd is wrong, as usual by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Hell they had to write a "Data goes crazy" episode every now and again, I reckon that was just to keep Brent Spiner sane.

      I appreciated those episodes. It showed the range of acting that he was able to do which was really interesting and fun to watch.

  27. Different versions? by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Note that these mirrors appear to serve different files. On the lcarscom.net mirror i got a 22.7mb file for act one, while on an other mirror it gave me a (approx) 2.5mb file. And by the way, that other mirror gave also me a dry 97 bytes/second. Pffiuww.. Havent experienced that since i retuned my oldfasioned isdn modem for a wdsl connection. How about bittorent? Are there generous people here? :D It'll be wordt some extra karma i'm sure.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  28. Captain's Log, Stardate 2004.48 by Bob(TM) · · Score: 5, Funny

    The beginning of our fourth mission year brought a new challenge ... perhaps beyond our capabilities. Upon entry into Cyberian space, the efficiency of the Enterprise warp engines was reduced to nearly 1% of their rated capacity. Working together, Science Office Spock and Chief Engineer Scott have determined the physics of the region of space we currently occupy is somehow different from normal space - rapid movement, at least in the conventional sense, is impossible. Originally observed and reported by a member of the Engineering staff, the phenomena has been unofficially named for him.

    Recommend commendation for Ensign Sleesh Doot for identification and communication of this phenomena. Let us all hope we are all able to make it out to be able to see he actually gets it.

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    1. Re:Captain's Log, Stardate 2004.48 by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      Sleesh Doot... Hmmm... Is that Dutch?

    2. Re:Captain's Log, Stardate 2004.48 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, does Ensign Sleesh Doot happen to be wearing a red shirt?

  29. Why bother with the original characters? by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    Hasn't Kirk been done to death?
    This: Startship Exeter is a much better project IMO. New characters. Different ship. Same era as TOS.

    1. Re:Why bother with the original characters? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      My god! There are NEW episodes in the works!

      The rest of /. probably thinks you are talking only about the original Exeter episode.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:Why bother with the original characters? by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      True. I hope a few /.ers will donate like I did. :)

  30. killed by /. by Squapper · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thanks for slashdotting this...now i won't be able to downnload it until it goes off the mainpage...

  31. I'll give it a try by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    Can't be worse than Enterprise.

  32. WMV sucks by sahonen · · Score: 0, Troll

    I refuse to use Windows Media Player, since it's a bloated piece of crap, but I can't play it in any other player. Way to alienate your audience (i.e. geeks) guys.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    1. Re:WMV sucks by manganese4 · · Score: 1

      My download ran in Winamp just fine

      --
      I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
    2. Re:WMV sucks by Silverlancer · · Score: 0

      Its faster, easier to use, and less bloated than Winamp ;). Only thing I know thats less bloated than WMP is mPlayer. I don't know why people bash WMP--it uses very little memory, its fast, it has good visualizations, a great GUI, a good song-management system, good portable device support... don't know what more there is to have.

    3. Re:WMV sucks by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, Winamp work just fine and so does Media Player Classic. Probably a lot more too. This is because Windows Media Video is just a simple DirectPlay codec AFAIK, and any media players supporting DirectPlay (basically all does) can play that WMV movie.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:WMV sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All well and good - if you're non-geeky enough to be running windoze...

    5. Re:WMV sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because it's proprietary lockin to Microshaft??? /.ers tend to be running OSes other than 'doze....

    6. Re:WMV sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know why people bash WMP--it uses very little memory, its fast, it has good visualizations, a great GUI, a good song-management system, good portable device support.

      That's all very true -- if by that you mean it uses a shitload of memory, is astoundingly slow, taking about a minute to start on my laptop, has crappy visualizations (GOOM is far superiour,) an ugly GUI, and a song-management system that isn't customizable enough.

      mplayer is far better.

    7. Re:WMV sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPlayer worked as well...

    8. Re:WMV sucks by Silverlancer · · Score: 0

      a minute to start? strange, takes under a second to start for me.

  33. Probably mod this one up........ by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    Well he's right and gets it on a technicality ;)

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  34. what would happen? by AndyChrist · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if you could make new episodes of the original Star Trek, with the same characters, worse acting (believe it or not), better special effects, and lower resolution?

    You would never, ever breed.

    You might forget for a while having been beaten up for your lunch money as a kid.

    You get to wear for a little while, clothes more fashionable than anything else you ever wear. (Them ST uniforms is sharp!)

    Or THIS could happen

    1. Re:what would happen? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      That sound like the BEST TREK EVER!!! I need the DVD!

  35. Next time let's act smart! by ClausCCC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next time someone posts a link to a video instead of each and everyone trying to get the files and slashdotting the server in the process we do the following: Everyone flips a coin 10 times. The lucky guys (1 in 1024) whose coin flips all come up head actually go and download the files. Whose who got the files seed a .torrent. No Slashdotting => happy slashdot crowd!

    1. Re:Next time let's act smart! by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bookmark the site, set up a counter to remind me to visit again in N days, then download after the slashdot croud has thinned out. I could tell you my formula for incrementing the delay counter, but then it would become worthless.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    2. Re:Next time let's act smart! by Smork · · Score: 0

      You could implement it as a Firefox extension ;-)

  36. Because... XVID by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    For playback of files this size, XVID cuts the mustard on the quality/compression tradeoff just as well; only everyone gets to watch it. (even with lower spec hardware)

    I'll just cower in the corner know while I get flamed for even suggesting a FOSS codec 'cuts the mustard' :/

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  37. Congratulations! by master_p · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although their work is not up to the quality of Paramount's production, I want to congratulate them for chasing and finally realizing their dream. Keep up the good work, guys! and don't be disappointed because of any negative comments out there!

    I think that only teams like them can offer something new and innovative...big companies are locked onto money chase. These guys can do anything, as long as they are doing it for hobby.

    1. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Paramount's lawyers are drafting a C&D letter as I type this. It's going to be dead before anyone finishes downloading it.

    2. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were really innovative, they would be inventing their own damn starship instead of ripping someone else's wholesale. This is the reason fanfiction always sucks. I say, go ahead and be negative. Real life doesn't give As for effort.

    3. Re:Congratulations! by big_groo · · Score: 1

      Wait...*You're* the guy in the Tron suit...aren't you?

  38. Whoopsie! by Alsee · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen it yet, but reading their message board it sounds like there's a booboo. In the chess game Kirk and Spock may both be moving WHITE peices.

    Or maybe it's just Kirk pulling a Kobayashi Maru.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Whoopsie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly 21st century humans... That is how you play chess in the 23rd century.

    2. Re:Whoopsie! by DevolvingSpud · · Score: 1

      So this is the true depths of geekdom - finding nitpicky errors in FAN FICTION. Actually I guess it could be worse - we could sit around enumerating plot inconsistencies in Sex Trek 3:The Search For Sperm.

      --
      Keep your friends close.
      Keep your enemies in a little jar on your desk.
    3. Re:Whoopsie! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      It wasn't intended as a complaint, more of an amusing thing to watch for. Added entertainment value. Particularly amusing if you assume it's just Kirk cheating to win (as usual, chuckle).

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Whoopsie! by DevolvingSpud · · Score: 1

      And mine wasn't really meant to bust your chops, either... more of just a comment on our collective geekiness. Everybody out there who HAS discussed the plot discrepancies in Sex Trek raise your hands... And Kirk, cheat? No, he just has a slightly different way of interpreting the rules. And besides, Kirk would never be caught playing with^H^H^H^Hagainst himself. Man, I'm on some kind of weird sophomoric bent today. Must be the headiness of Father's Day or something.

      --
      Keep your friends close.
      Keep your enemies in a little jar on your desk.
  39. The nerd test by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Star Trek DS9: "To boldly go... no where. We're on a freaking space station people. We stay stationary, people... that's our job - to be dull!"

    I was about to write a 3 paragraph rant about how you're wrong about DS9. But I stopped for a moment and thought "why take it seriously?"

    Well this is a bit of a dilemma. Am I a nerd for initially wanting to write that pointless rebuttal, or did I escape being a nerd by thinking "eh it's just a show, so what?"

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:The nerd test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this is a bit of a dilemma. Am I a nerd for initially wanting to write that pointless rebuttal, or did I escape being a nerd by thinking "eh it's just a show, so what?"

      You escaped being a non-nerd by posting a message to slashdot at saturday evening.

  40. Re:Obligatory by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Yeah but Star Trek had an interracial kiss before the soaps :)"

    You're talking about Dax and Worf, right?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  41. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, Data and Geordi.

  42. Re:Obligatory by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    Actually it's been pointed out that in terms of different species, Star Trek is kind of racist--there's not a whole lot of diversity among Klingons or Romulans for example. Of course this is probably due to their allegorical origins.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  43. The tech geek connection by tm2b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been thinking about this since stumbling across it (and downloading it before submitting it to Slashdot).

    What's really cool about this is that, as promised, the low price of quality digital video equipment and computer editing is really letting people chase their passions in this way, and the low cost distribution of the Internet is letting

    That's really cool. All the snide comments about Trek creativity that some readers would undoubtable make aside, perhaps the promise of a creative renaissance in video fiction can actually be fulfilled. It doesn't matter if 99% is crap, a higher volume means more great stuff being created and it just becomes a matter of finding the great stuff.

    May a thousand flowers bloom. Times a thousand.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  44. Thank you... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Shatner was making a living as a stage and television actor long before he did Trek. You don't get callbacks for Shakespeare if you suck. With ST:TOS he wasn't exactly getting Shakespeare-quality scripts to work with...

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Thank you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd beg to differ with you, the episode about the guy who was white on one side and black on the other hating the guy who was black on one side and white on the other was so well written it puts that Shakespeare fellow's writing to shame.

    2. Re:Thank you... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Shatner was making a living as a stage and television actor long before he did Trek. You don't get callbacks for Shakespeare if you suck. With ST:TOS he wasn't exactly getting Shakespeare-quality scripts to work with...

      I think the only problem with Shatner's acting was that he couldn't seem to turn down his "stage presence". On TV he always looked like he was doing live theater and exaggerrating every word and movement "so the people in the back of the theater could [see|hear] it". Either he never realized, or the director never told him, that on TV you should tone it down just a little.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Thank you... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but this has become a Star Trek thing. Shatner, Shakespearrean actor who filled the screen with his presence. Patrick Stewart, Skaespearrean actor who filled the screen with his stern brogue and cue-ball head. Avery Brooks, I dunno if he's Shakespearrean but he's a real over the top actor who stole the show in every scene he was in...shit, do you not remember the tension in the DS9 pilot when Sisco met Picard? I thought there was going to be some kind of explosion due to an overload of intense acting

      In fact, one could say the reason that Voyager and Enterprise suck so badly is that their captains just don't have the overacting leadership needed to make it in Star Fleet.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Thank you... by mariox19 · · Score: 1

      I agree! To take what I think is a perfect example, the real breakout character on Voyager was Robert Picardo (the doctor). Here was someone capable of over-the-top acting -- just like Worf, just like Picard, just like Sisko, just Kirk.

      To tell you the truth, I'm sick of all these "modern style" actors who think every intense emotion should be conveyed either by tense whispers or hoarse shouting. Give me someone with a real stage voice -- an instrument -- any day over these childish actors.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    5. Re:Thank you... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Of course, this style of acting would never work on, say, "Friends." But in the "life as we know it" world of Sci-Fi, I'd much rather have Patrick Stewart than, I dunno, Tom Hanks. Come on -- Darth Vader was James Earl Jones, that deep, rumbling voice shook the death star to its foundation!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Thank you... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of all these "modern style" actors who think every intense emotion should be conveyed either by tense whispers or hoarse shouting.

      While we're on the subject... I am *so* tired of actors/actresses who think that stuttering a word makes their delivery sound more natural. They do this over and over again...
      "I-I-I mean... ah. I-I-I just can't understand it, you know?"

      When's the last fricking time you've heard someone talk like that? Hugh Grant is the best example I can give. Extremely annoying.

    7. Re:Thank you... by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Apparantly, when shooting Wrath of Khan, the strategy was to do take after take after take, until Shatner wore out and began to turn of stage acting mode. At least someone figured it out...

  45. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and Star Wars Episode II was racist because the Maori actor playing Jango Fett looked both very "Arab" and very "latino/mexican."

  46. Re:I'll give it a try, if there aren't nazis by voidstin · · Score: 1

    I dunno, I haven't seen it yet. Does it have nazis in it? Then it would at least tie Enterprise in terms of suckiness...

  47. Petition for Star Trek Topic on Slashdot by doconnor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For too long Star Trek, the most important series in Geek history, has had second class status to Star Wars, The Lord of the Rings and even The Matrix. Those series has their own topics. Star Trek deserves better. Join the others who have signed the petition to give Star Trek a topic on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Petition for Star Trek Topic on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The Death Star could so blow up an entire fleet of borg cubes!!! No topic for wimpy Star Trek!!

    2. Re:Petition for Star Trek Topic on Slashdot by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      To say Star Trek has second class status to Star Wars is like saying the Beatles have second class status to Jennifer Lopez. (Sure it does, to ignorant, vapid kiddies.)

      The other dorks get their category because they're newer, they get more current news, and the Slashdot owners are lame for giving them their own sections. Besides, its demoralizing to have a unique section saying Star Trek:X sucks in comparison to TOS.

      I need a Star Trek section on /. like I need a Bible section to /. . Just leave the sleeping dogs lie.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    3. Re:Petition for Star Trek Topic on Slashdot by The+Meshback · · Score: 1

      And /. even has a Bill Gates borg icon.

      Oh, the injustice.

    4. Re:Petition for Star Trek Topic on Slashdot by RocketRainbow · · Score: 1

      Yay! ST topic for /.! I want my ST news and gossip and I want it in its own category! When I check out my news for nerds, this is what I am looking for!

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
    5. Re:Petition for Star Trek Topic on Slashdot by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      Allow me to nominate a new entry into the Unknown Geek Cheezee Hall of Fame:

      "The Fury" 1979 by Brian de Palma

      staring Kirk Douglas, John Cassevetes, gorgeous Amy Irving, wonderful Carrie Snodgress, and Andrew Stevens. (If you don't understand why every female cast member is adorned with a complementary adjective, you're not a real Geek).

      If you haven't seen this and you can find it in the $2.98 bin of the discount video store, snatch it up. A true cheezeball masterpiece.

  48. John Winston guest starred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just in case any die hard fans didn't watch before they posted.

    That's the [Real] John Winston from the [Original] series there.

    Some [Red Shirts] just never die, and get promoted to Captain.

    Kudo's Yeah!!!

  49. Am I the only one that remembers... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    ...a book with a similar title, consisting of stories written for TOS by the fans themselves, especially selected for the compilation because they were consistent with the ST universe?

    Regardless, I WOULD LOVE seeing an episode similar to one of the written stories where the cast appears in the ST universe while the real Kirk, SPock, and Bones wind up on the 20th century studio set... ;-)

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Am I the only one that remembers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REPEAT AFTER ME:

      Kirk, Spock and Bones are just characters.
      THEY ARE NOT REAL!!

  50. Uhhhh... "Starship Exeter" and now...? by DonWallace · · Score: 1

    Absolutely incredible. We now have the phenomenon of two competing, non-Paramount reincarnations of "TOS style" in production at the same time.

  51. May not be worth watching? by cdwdwkr · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this will be worth watching. Unless Kirk is going to be gooing up sexy alien women in a decontamination chamber...I'm sticking with Enterprise.

  52. Next Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Sir, long range scanners indicate a Cease & Desist Notice approaching at WARP SPEED!"

    "Scotty! We.. .. ah, fuck it. Let's burn the set down for the insurance money and go to Denny's."

    1. Re:Next Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hidden Frontier is on its fifth season. If anything they are a larger target than some of the newer startups.

  53. DS9 is first rate! by mariox19 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DS9 had the most human stories of all, and is in many ways the most original of all the shows following TOS. The scripts were terrific: well written and thought provoking; and the acting was most of the time really quite good.

    I'm with you -- it's the best of all.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  54. Old news by pico303 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this news a tad old? I remember seeing this on /. a few months ago.

    1. Re:Old news by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Yeah but someone managed to complete one of the downloads and review it - mines estimated time is 6 days for act one, thats not too bad i guess.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  55. How about a CC Theora+Vorbis for comparison? by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    I was thinking a Theora+Vorbis encoding would be interesting to compare with (now that Theora I is finalized, it's safe to encode movies in it). But I don't have the video file from which the WMV was made, and transcoding won't show off Theora or Vorbis. Perhaps someone who made the movie will read this and make a Theora+Vorbis encoding (it would be even nicer if it were licensed under a Creative Commons license and packaged with a copy of the applicable license so we know we can legally share it with our friends).

    1. Re:How about a CC Theora+Vorbis for comparison? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      I'd love to suggest Theora myself but with all the time in the world I still haven't got round to checking it out ;)

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  56. Package a copy of the license too. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Archiving the files together in a package makes it easy for people to share the two together. It's a good idea to package a copy of the applicable license so recipients know what their rights are. Websites come and go, but a text file is easy to read anywhere and very small compared to the size of the movie.

  57. She cannae take no more cap'n! by minator · · Score: 2, Funny
    kirk: I've never seen anything like it, what do you think Mr spock?

    Spock: It is illogical, I know of no force in nature which can be so powerful.

    Bones: I'm a doctor not a computer geek dammit.

    Kirk: Then there is nothing else for it. We have to ...surrender!

    later...

    The new beings beam abord, they look remarkably human (this is Star Trek), wear jeans and T-Shirts, smell and have long hair in ponytails.

    Kirk: Oh my God.

    Spock: We welcome our new Slashdot reading overlords.

  58. TIME FOR YOUR SWIRLY, POINDEXTER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  59. Star Trek is a whore by Jherico · · Score: 1
    only teams like them can offer something new and innovative

    Starting up a cancled TV show from the 60s is not innovative. Its obsessive and possibly unhealthy.

    If you ask the average trekkie why they are so into the show, they typically come up with drivel along the lines of 'the ideals of the federation'. But there are no federation ideals. Being a franchise owned by a major media conglomerate means that the only ideals you can count on from anything or anyone in the show are those which are most likely to make money.

    --

    Jherico

    What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  60. Re:I'll give it a try, if there aren't nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to admit that the Alien Nazi on Enterprise at least gave the fan dorks something to argue about over the off season. They will be debating about the nazi being or not being a Reman until the 9,323,232 Star Trek series is released.

  61. slow rubbish by bani · · Score: 1

    overnet is a pile of slow crap. it takes literally months to download some files. some files you won't ever get, because so many idiots leave them unfinished. tons of 99% but 1 segment missing crap like that. and they never get completed. ever. i have to wonder if lots of people are doing this on purpose...

    winmx etc are much faster and less hassle.

  62. available? by dmitrygr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Available for download? Not anymore.

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
  63. I thought it was really cool. by LionKimbro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I watched it, I thought it was great!

    It felt authentic, in a way that everything after ST:TNG does not.

    It's true, it's rusty. But they seem really comitted, and I think they're going to master this system that they've created.

    I just have one major wish:

    I really wish the audio were redubbed. Do the shots just using the microphones on the set, and then perform a seperate dubbing session, so that the sounds are clear.

    Regardless of whether the audio is improved or not, I'm a dedicated fan now.

    I haven't watched a Sci-Fi TV show in about 7 years. But I'm excited about these shows! :)

  64. No...Multicast Please! by rmdyer · · Score: 1

    No, it's a perfect application for multicast which every PHB network manager conveniently discarded. Why-o-why did multicast die!?? It would have allowed T.V. over the internet...but noooo...every single company controlling the Internet wanted to use unicast because "they" could control the horizontal, and the vertical. So now the amount of traffic increases based non-linearly on how many companies are offering video services. LAME.

    1. Re:No...Multicast Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is hope for multicast in ipv6, thankfully, but multicast support seems to be far behind deployment of ipv6 itself. Multicast support is mandatory in ipv6 I think, but perhaps routing of it isn't, and that is the hard part. Sixxs seems to use ecmh for this, but I don't know if that is an ideal solution.

  65. A five day mission... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously.. tried just downloading the teaser. Mozilla download calculates the download time at 136 hours.

  66. Why not CGI the original actors by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Really, with the increasing power of CGI, it seems within our reach to just recreate the original actors and their original voices, as they were in 1967. We could go on with Capt. Kirk and Mr. Spock for a thousand years, if we like.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Why not CGI the original actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's what I thought they'd done when I first read about this and I thought that would be so cool! I'm really disappointed now, although I haven't actually managed to finish a download yet so I'll have to wait and see what the casting's like. If that's meanna be Kirk on the cover pic here, the big guy at the back, then he needs a haircut! The hair looks waaay too big and flopping over his ears lmao!

  67. Aren't the actors a little... young? by chiph · · Score: 1

    I think I'm showing my age, but aren't the actors on the young side, to be playing the parts of Kirk, Spock, etc? McCoy especially. I mean, I grew up watching the series (and the local NBC station butchering the re-runs by showing them out of sequence), and I always had the impression that Kirk was in his late-thirties (went along with his fast rise to the captaincy). The cast of 5yearmission.com seem to be college age, if that. Chip H.

    1. Re:Aren't the actors a little... young? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirk was 30 when he became captain of the Enterprise.

    2. Re:Aren't the actors a little... young? by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      McCoy though, was in his 40s or so IIRC. The guy they have doing him looks to be in his 20's. way too young.

    3. Re:Aren't the actors a little... young? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth... I play McCoy and I actually AM a doctor - nearly 40 years old.

      Bones - New Voyages

  68. This reminds me... by mark-t · · Score: 1
    A while back, I recall someone did an original series-ish feel story. I can't recall of the show off hand... all I remember for sure was that there was a _really_ cheezy looking monster, an andorian that looked exactly like how they were done in the original series, and a hokey klingon with obviously fake facial hair.

    Anyone here remember what I'm talking about?

    1. Re:This reminds me... by etherlad · · Score: 1

      That'd be the Starship Exeter that everyone here's been mentioning. (:

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
  69. .torrent please by mabu · · Score: 1

    Can someone post a bit torrent link for these files?

    Dammit Jim, the web server's dead!

  70. Server Configuration (was Re:zip ?) by whm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if they configured their web server they wouldn't have to screw around like that :)

    The need to tell their webserver to send .WMV files with a content type like 'application/octet-stream' instead of whatever video/* type they default to. This will tell the browser to download it as a file instead of streaming and displaying it. As far as I'm aware MSIE has been respecting content-types with every version after 4.0.

    1. Re:Server Configuration (was Re:zip ?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As far as I'm aware MSIE has been respecting content-types with every version after 4.0.

      To my knowledge MSIE still tries to guess the content-type by looking at the data. This is what allows broken websites that send HTML files with content-type 'text/plain' to exist - IE displays them just fine. Of course, the webmasters of such sites will just tell you that your browser is broken because 'it works in IE', but this is getting way too off topic so I'll just shut up now.

  71. It's all relative by lexus99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem that many people reading this would make it a forum of right Trek and wrong Trek. There really is no such thing as a right Trek or visa-versa. Every Trek series has had its moments, as every Trek fan would agree. The whole basis of Trek was indeed the vision of Roddenberry, but since Roddenberry's death, the vision has stopped. It is now up to others to decide the direction of the Final Frontier.

    The direction chosen seems to be bad at times, but still, they manage to come up with a great story every few episodes, regardless of the series.

    I was really disappointed with Enterprise, especially during the second seaon, but the writers have really turned the bad to the better.

    Voyager had some really GREAT episodes...."The Year of Hell" was awesome, but in contrast, meaningless, as the whole year was erased, ala Dallas. It was still a gripping pair of episodes, regardless.

    Janeway was not a bad caption. If fact, she was so modeled after Picard it was obvious. Did you not notice? Look closer!

    DS9 had the episode (to mention just one) that had O'Brien serve many years in a prison cell only to find out later he had only been subjected to a few hours of mental "treatment". Scarey stuff, and a real look at our future.

    Capt. Picard always had great moments, but none like the episode "The Inner Light" (also the title of a great indian influenced Beatles song). I remember tears coming to my eyes the first time I saw that episode. The soundtrack is amazing!

    "Dear Doctor", an Enterprise episode, was perhaps the best so far. They have come a long way since the second season, but "Dear Doctor" stands out in good story telling.

    That's all........

    1. Re:It's all relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i didnt know janeway was bald...

    2. Re:It's all relative by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

      But can some good eps save a whole show?

  72. alternative Star Trek titles by technoCon · · Score: 1

    My wife spoiled Star Trek when she pointed out that Star Trek was misnamed.

    DS9 = Star Trek Melrose Space

    Voyager = Star Trek Gilligan's Island

  73. Pattern Recognition, Wm. Gibson by technoCon · · Score: 1

    Yaknow, when William Gibson writes a story about someone posting video on the net, figuring out what's going on supports a whole novel.

    BUT when someone does so in real life, everybody kvetches about the acting.

  74. WAAAAAYYY old news by serutan · · Score: 1

    Hard to believe Slasdotters haven't seen this already, but nobody seems to be saying they have. New Voyages Episode One has been available on the web since January.

    I sort of enjoyed it. Yes most of the acting is pretty bad, but the story is very much in the TOS mold, and the sets and effects are very well done. Using the original Star Trek theme and incidental music gave it a nice feel. Nice CG Enterprise too, I thought.

    On their site (when it's not horked) they explain their decision to use the original characters and ship rather than create new ones. They see the crew of the original Enterprise as classic characters, like Robin Hood and his men or the Knights of the Round Table, that can be played by different actors and still be appreciated for what they are.

    I think that's kind of an interesting point. Television shows are hardly ever redone, but that seems to have changed in the last 10 or 15 years... the Addams Family, the Brady Bunch, Dragnet, Scooby Doo, the Flintstones, Battlestar Galactica... Star Trek was one of the first TV shows to be made into a movie, perhaps The first.

    New Voyages could use better acting, but as the original Star Trek cast dies off I think we should try to accept new versions of the old characters.

  75. Ansen Timmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the server was unlucky enough to be wearing a red uniform.

    Looks like the big fake Slashdot Beast just pounded it with a fake looking bolder.

    BTW TOS>TNG

    (I keed because I keer :)

  76. Hell no by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    I really wish the audio were redubbed. Do the shots just using the microphones on the set, and then perform a seperate dubbing session [...]

    Would make it worse. You need really good talent for dubbing. It's hard. Trust me , I know what I'm talking about. I'm from germany where all shows and movies are dubbed. And if done cheaply it sucks ass.

  77. My review by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's my little review of what I saw so far (Yeah, as if anyone cares):

    Starship Exeter: I like the lighting and design. Some acting is ok other is very bad. Maybe some sponsors relatives had to get a job on the show. Greatest annyoance: It looks like they used VHS or SuperVHS, no DV. And they should have done something in post production to give it more of a film look. As the original was filmed on 16 or 35 mm film.

    New Voyages: Brilliant set design, nicely combinated with CGI that tries to recreate the classic look. And they treated their video to more look like film. All in all it best matches the classic series. Feels cheap here and there? Yes, the original did too. Sometimes really felt like watching a never before seen episode of the original show. Which happened for the last time in the seventies when I watched in in my payamas before going to bed.

    Final Frontier: Good story, best acting, overall good look, but with all the bluescreen stuff it got the look of movie sequences in a Star Trek game. Anyone remembers Starfleet Academy?

    Which gives me an idea which is pretty obvious: How about a fan based effort about Starfleet Academy? You could give it a classic look but also could make your own designs. It would make perfect sense to use young actors. Still you could use the classic characters. IIRC Paramount thought about that concept before.

    What I really don't get: Why not use a format that will play on every machine (standalone DVD players included) and LOOK GOOD FFS? Sorenson QuickTime, WMV ... Someone please give them some hours of video encoding 101. (Grumbel ...) No, size shouldn't matter. There are distribution systems that work perfectly fine for big files, like BitTorrent and donkey/overnet.

    Would be a nice thing if those projects would join their efforts.

    In the end all those shows are good enough to make me want to watch more of them. Which is more than the first season of "Enterprise" achieved for me.

    1. Re:My review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "Final Frontier," did you mean "Hidden Frontier?"

    2. Re:My review by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

      Argh, f***, yes :)

    3. Re:My review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I thank you for the lovely compliments on Hidden Frontier. [bowing from the waist] I am the head of the makeup department, and I also play Dr. Henglaar.

      I'm glad you liked it.

      John A. Whiting (neither anonymous, nor a coward)

  78. Working Torrent... by The+Blue+Knight · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... is located here... At least until my tracker gets hosed.

    --
    TIAVAS HS ENI I RNG S YO Y I N G
    1. Re:Working Torrent... by Fetbi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting the .torrent link. I am downloading at 200KB/s.

    2. Re:Working Torrent... by Riggs+E. · · Score: 1

      I just nabbed it at 350 kbps. Thanks again!

      --
      ------ Send your whines to /dev/null
      Frankly, I just don't care . . .
    3. Re:Working Torrent... by sabat · · Score: 1

      Excellent, thank you.

      I suggest that all of us who are using this torrent should leave the bittorrent window up for a day or two after the download is finished. This is a download that really needs that kind of help; the site's mirrors are worthless right now.

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
    4. Re:Working Torrent... by XanC · · Score: 1

      Holy moley, I just maxed out at 800KB/s! Torrent is AWESOME. Thank you!!

    5. Re:Working Torrent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pulled it at 360KB/s - THANKS!

    6. Re:Working Torrent... by shumway · · Score: 1

      620 KiB/s here...guess it's time to leave a tip

      --
    7. Re:Working Torrent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! 530KB/s is so much better then the .01kb/s i was geting yesterday useing the mirrors.

  79. Torrent Slashdotted ;-) by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    is GOOD ... I'm getting some 400KBps peaks

  80. khan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khan is actually a title used in many asian languages, sort of like "sir" in English. Here's a definition.

    The "kh" has a special pronunciation, as per this page: 'occurs in Hebrew and Arabic, in the German pronunciation of Nacht, or in the Scottish pronunciation of "Loch" (a voiceless velar fricative).' or the Dutch pronunciation of G in Gronigen.

    But as is unfortunately the case too often, this is all lost on the average American.

    -hadohk

  81. "Manos" by XanC · · Score: 1
    Witness the (unintended) horror that is "Manos" Hands of Fate for a look at what lousy dubbing can get you.

    You'll probably have to get the MST3K version, but that's okay; it's the only way it's watchable.

  82. Stuttering by mariox19 · · Score: 1

    Blame Jimmy Stewart, I suppose. But, his stuttering is so intertwined with his folksy, everyman style of acting that it's impossible to imagine him without it. The rest are just pale imitations.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  83. Re:*WORSE* acting??? Hidden Frontier WINS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this factual catagory, Hidden Frontier beats them ALL. I guess I am still too plagued with the such radical & unfortunate notions of videos containing respectable plots, acting and camera work to care about such farcical video crap. The megalomania of the crew gets BIGGER and BIGGER in reverse order to how this horrid puny video just seems to get WORSE and WORSE with every outing.

  84. Re:slow rubbish, Hidden Frontier crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re:*WORSE* acting??? Hidden Frontier WINS! In this factual catagory, Hidden Frontier beats them ALL. I guess I am still too plagued with the such radical & unfortunate notions of videos containing respectable plots, acting and camera work to care about such farcical video crap. The megalomania of the crew gets BIGGER and BIGGER in reverse order to how this horrid puny video just seems to get WORSE and WORSE with every outing. For the funny, sad, unethical Jerry Springer side of Hidden Frontier read check out this BBS discussion, page 8, "HF truth police" at: http://svortex.tiimipeli.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t =2&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=105