Slashdot Mirror


Wearable Cell Phones Are Here

An anonymous reader writes "BusinessWeek Online just ran an article on wearable cell phones. A cell phone in a powder case? In a wrist watch? Inside your earring? Sure, why not. And these phones could make it into the U.S. in the next year."

190 comments

  1. The last place I'd want it... by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is in my ear. I hate telemarketers enough as-is, but to have them that close to me 24/7? I'll stick with my normal phone, thank you.

    1. Re:The last place I'd want it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ring Ring Ring Ring - Banana Phone!

    2. Re:The last place I'd want it... by zoloto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or on my wrist for that matter. It's one thing to get a phone call in the middle of a date and ignore it because it's on vibrate, but if it's on my wrist in my watch it's a little harder to ignore if I'm trying to make a move. Then again, that can't be all bad actually... ... nevermind, carry on.

    3. Re:The last place I'd want it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did anyone else read that as "a cell phone in a powder keg"?

      i think i need to cut down on the lattes.

    4. Re:The last place I'd want it... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's one thing to get a phone call in the middle of a date...

      This is unlikely to be a problem for most of the readers here....

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    5. Re:The last place I'd want it... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Although, since for most readers here the date would be of either the inflatable or the 2-D variety, having a watch that vibrates your hand up and down might actually be the ultimate couch potato accessory.

      I mean we are now eliminting most of the effort in what might be the last form of exercise and exertion that many of these people have.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    6. Re:The last place I'd want it... by cliffa3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This would disrupt a movie even more...just imagine, you're sitting there and the guy down from you falls out in the aisle looking like he's having a seizure. Then again, maybe the vibrate functionality will be taken out for the ones you wear in your ear.

    7. Re:The last place I'd want it... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      No, just a cell phone in a powder case. Nobody hauls a keg around in their clothes. Your ordinary powder case would be convenient, however. As long as there's enough room left and a cover to keep the powder dry. The ammo belts are fine for having enough the ever-so-practical bullets, but the esthetics of a black powder dueling pistol is simply required in some social settings.

    8. Re:The last place I'd want it... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... KITT, I need you to meet me at the back door.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  2. Repost? by nberardi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Isn't this a repost from earlier today?

    1. Re:Repost? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it was only in the future queue which is viewable by subscribers...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Repost? by lysacor · · Score: 1

      I believe you are right, I know I saw it earlier, but I believe there was a delay on the posting :)

  3. finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can have a pocket protector that double as a cell, i knew i wouldn't have to suffer much longer

    1. Re:finally! by lovecult · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I believe, collegue frink,
      that you may have miscalculated the source of your suffering.

  4. Tin foil hat... by cbrocious · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You gotta wonder if these will be small enough to be able to be given to people as presents to spy on them. "Wow, these are beautiful earrings! Thank You!" "No, thank YOU!"

    Perhaps a privacy concern for the future.

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    1. Re:Tin foil hat... by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 5, Funny

      To spy on them it'd take a lot of anytime minutes. Better have it set to spy on Nights and Weekends only.

      --

      --
      Are you a Chipotle Fan?
    2. Re:Tin foil hat... by cbrocious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now... "Can you hear me now? Damn."

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    3. Re:Tin foil hat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, how about a privacy concern for right now? It's not like there haven't been bugs available for years that can do this.

    4. Re:Tin foil hat... by MainframeKiller · · Score: 1

      I can see it now... "Can you hear me now? Damn."

      I think it should be:

      Can you wear it now? Good!

      --
      http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
      Your source for commercial free 80's music!
  5. Wouldn't it be easier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to just tattoo a barcode on your forehead?

  6. Yeah by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Cellular Thong is already on pre-order.

    --

    --
    Are you a Chipotle Fan?
    1. Re:Yeah by nautical9 · · Score: 1
      I know what my ring tone would be...

      Frrrrraaap! "Excuse me! ... I have a call."

    2. Re:Yeah by preposterity · · Score: 1

      You seem to have an ineffable obsession with footwear.

    3. Re:Yeah by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm, bet that'll get people to switch the ringer from loud ring tones to vibrate.

    4. Re:Yeah by karzan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn Aussies ... I did find it confusing when my rugby-playing Aussie housemate said for the first time 'let me just go get my thongs' ...

    5. Re:Yeah by keefey · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had the same when I arrived in Sydney. Someone asked "brought your thongs?", and all I could say back was "what, my leatherette g-string and leopard skin pouch?"

    6. Re:Yeah by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      I had the same when I arrived in Sydney. Someone asked "brought your thongs?", and all I could say back was "what, my leatherette g-string and leopard skin pouch?"
      Yeah but I'm much more comfortable with our meaning of thong in this case, I mean a mobile phone in a rubber sandle type thing is just silly, but well the other way, man I don't even want to think of answering that phone eeewwww icky.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    7. Re:Yeah by antic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Makes you wonder about "ring" tones...

      That's one ring that shouldn't have a tone. Keep it silent and odourless kids...

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    8. Re:Yeah by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do us all a favour then: Don't get the camera model. :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:Yeah by gosand · · Score: 1
      My Cellular Thong is already on pre-order.

      That will keep people from borrowing your phone.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    10. Re:Yeah by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      You want a thong, you're a guy, doesn't anyone else see a problem? :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    11. Re:Yeah by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Shoe-phone, anyone?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    12. Re:Yeah by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

      If his name is ParticleMan911...maybe he's a superhero?

      --
      -CowboyNick
    13. Re:Yeah by raider_red · · Score: 1

      I assume that's for when you're talking out of your ass.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  7. From the article by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 5, Funny

    That could change soon. NTT DoCoMo, a pioneer in wireless services, is developing a technology called FingerWhisper that uses a hand's bone structure to make a wrist watch phone easier to manage and operate. Here's how it works: When a call arrives, the phone sends vibrations through the bones in the index finger. When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice. The technology also would allow users to dial phone numbers or send text messages by tapping their palms in certain ways. And the technology doesn't seem to pose any health risks, says a DoCoMo spokesperson.

    And you thought the taco-shaped side-talking N-Gage was embarassing...

    1. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      When the finger is slipped into the ear canal

      Folk singers have been beta-testing this one for years
    2. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And all this time my boss had his finger up his ass I thought he was just an idiot - come to find out he's really an early adopter!

      *squint*

      Oh.. Ear.. Nevermind.

    3. Re:From the article by woefulhc · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. This bit in the article made me wonder

      "When the finger is slipped into the ear canal"...

      Isn't your elbow the only thing it is safe to stick in your ear?

      --
      Paul
    4. Re:From the article by Punto · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice.

      This is actually one of the coolest designs for cell phones I've ever seen, and the worst thing is that they've been reporting this for years now (the oldest mention of it I can remember is from before 2000), and still no sign of it on this side of the pacific (or at least not on this side of the ecuador).

      I can't wait for them to arrive here, so I can finally have an excuse to get a cell phone, and join in on the annoyance.

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    5. Re:From the article by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      I'm generally told that anything smaller than a football is unsound. However, if one of my little books on Japanese culture is not leading me down the garden path ( ... ) apparently the Japanese are known to clean their own ears ( and those of particular intimates ) with small specially designed slivers of wood or plastic.

      Maybe they're a bit more confident / and or sure handed than us ham fisted westeners. Can anyone confirm?

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    6. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:From the article by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I'm Japanese (born and raised) and my parents taught me to use those beveled wooden sticks to clean my ears. I don't know whether it's safe, but it feels really good. Almost as good as sex.

      Of course, my people are also known for their other weirdnesses, such as a religion that believes the spirits of our dead ancestors haunt the streets picking up the shit of the living and eating it. I am not kidding.

    8. Re:From the article by kcorporation · · Score: 5, Funny
      When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice
      I think I speak for all of us when I say, "Go, go, Gadget Phone!"
    9. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and lets not forget the tentacle porn. yeah, no offense to you, you have a wonderfully rich cultural heratige and all that, but japanese people are freakin weird, where else can you get (used) panties in a vending machine...

    10. Re:From the article by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Yes, Bob is here, but no, I won't pass the phone to him."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I can't hear you! (Likes to clean ears in the Japanese fashion while jumping on trampolines)

    12. Re:From the article by badman99 · · Score: 0

      Yeah I'm Australian well we use VB(Beer) bottles to clean our ears. And my people are known to worship beer ..... Hmmmm beer, I think I might go pay homage right now

    13. Re:From the article by idmcgowan · · Score: 1

      It is probably safe if you are careful but it is definitely not good for your ears.

      Every time you "clean" your ear canals you irritate the lining which stimulates it to create more wax. Which makes you want to clean the wax out, which stimulates the lining etc.

      "You should never put anything smaller than your elbow into your ears."

  8. What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rectally mounted PDAs? I mean, intentionally?

  9. Star Trek by Entropy248 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aw shit... Here come those damned communicator pins. On the show, they seemed really cool. In an age with cellphones with speaker phone (or even worse, the dreaded BLEEP walkie talkies), they now seem like the rudest invention of all time. I've always thought the best compromise was an in-ear implant, but I suspect we're years away from those. Plus the three tone error message would officially hurt like hell. (We're sorry, the number you have reached has been disconnected. But, you won't hear this message because you're now deaf.)

    1. Re:Star Trek by gunnk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know -- they could be a real improvement.

      The rudest thing about cellphone conversations currently is that the conversation intrudes upon you, but you are excluded from participating because you only hear half the conversation.

      At least with communicator pins you hear both sides and can "contribute" with your own comments...

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
  10. Now I get it by k_killmore · · Score: 5, Funny

    All those guys on the subway talking to themselves weren't crazy, they were beta testers.

    1. Re:Now I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.. They are crazy.. Everyone knows you can't get a signal on the subway.

    2. Re:Now I get it by batzel · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be crazy to beta-test something like this...

  11. Great!!! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, how about some decent service? I mean, having a phone in an earring is great, but it would be nice if the damn thing worked half the time. Maybe if they spent some money on the damned plans and cell towers, instead of on the latest new candy coated pice of crap phone id be impressed.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Great!!! by Supradog · · Score: 0

      Well, in some places, like scandinavia, service/coverage is already very good for regular mobile phones(gsm).

      Mobiles with cameras are the new craze here, and i bet if any firm had jewelry phones og wearable phones it would sell pretty good.

      Too bad with the different standards we'll never get the real small japanese made phones here.

      --
      "A bug? nonono, it's a feature"
    2. Re:Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too would like a phone that worked half the time, it would be a great excuse instead of my current one which works more like 99.9% of the time.

    3. Re:Great!!! by WhiteDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, I just bought this new cellphone that's only the size of a button and clips to your lapel... and look they give you this free screen/keyboard thingy so you can operate it... and I pooh-pooh'ed this bluetooth thing...

      This might be OT, but how many people out there have access to both a GSM and CDMA phone network?
      In Australia, we now have most metro areas with both networks, but for the last few years all new installations are CDMA only.

      For several years I used a couple of different GSM mobiles - a cheap NEC Fido, then a top-of-the-line nokia 9110 - and on only one occasion did I ever get a call go straight to message bank when the phone should have rung.

      After my 9110 connected with hard surfaces one too many times, I got a cheap CDMA phone as it offered coverage in a town where I spend a fair bit of time (one of those damn CDMA only areas).

      Since then, it often goes to message bank when it should ring - most noticable when you are only a few hundred metres from the tower, or on one occassion sitting about 1.5km from a higher powered tower with a constant good signal for an hour - after which I got a phone call starting "oh, so you're answering your phone now - you weren't 5 minutes ago".

      Everyone I speak to has noticed similar behaviour, and they have many different makes/models of Crappy Dodgy Mobile Access phones.

      Other things - like getting the same SMS as I come into coverage for 3 days, SMS's being delivered days late, not being able to configure divert on no answer separatly to divert on out of range (that's a missing network feature btw), were also reported by the other CDMA users I spoke to.

      Last week I lost the cheap CDMA, and took the opportunity to go back to GSM (we had to tell the telco this was REALLY what we wanted to do several times before they accepted we had it right)

      Personally, I'm MUCH happier knowing which half of the time my mobile works now.
      Does this kind of thing apply to CDMA in the rest of the world?

    4. Re:Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to me. Sounds like a provider issue, not a technology issue. I don't go warning of the dangers of cold storage technology when my refridgerator breaks down.

    5. Re:Great!!! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Uh, the companies that make the phones don't make the towers. They make phones, and it's a cutthroat industry. Cell phone manufacturers cell in bulk to cell phone companies, not direct to consumers, so they sort of have to do whatever they can convince the cell phone company will attract people...which means smaller phones with a nicer look and wild new features, not better reception. Feature sets on new phones push the sales of long term calling plans which in turn is supposed to put up new towers.

      Of course, it rarely works out that way. The return from putting up new towers in an area where you already have customers is marginal, especially once you have them locked into a 2 year contract. The return on putting up new towers in areas you don't currently cover, thus increasing your possible customer base, is much more worthwhile. So that's where the money goes, until contract renewals come up in about 2 years. Then a few extra towers will show up.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Great!!! by gykh · · Score: 1

      Dude - you can't think of everything as being one monolithic organisation... Microsoft doesn't make CPUs, Linus doesn't make 17-inch monitors, Lucas doesn't TVs, and Nokia does not make cellphone towers.

      Sheesh.

    7. Re:Great!!! by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1

      Thus the question - because there is only one CDMA provider, at least where I am, so i can't try any other.

  12. Beam Me Up Scotty by keefey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There were reports on The Register, concerning wearable media: Motorola Showcases Watch Phone and Unix on a wristwatch. How important is functionality on your arm to the general public? Note, on your arm it becomes useable with only one hand. How much info could realistically be displayed, and how functional would a phone in a watch actually be?

    All those sci-fi shows show people talking at them in the style of a video - where is the privacy? It's all well and good when you're on Omnicron-8, but on the train, heading towards Slough, it's going to be a bit of a piss-take.

    Gimme the 6600 any day, I don't care if it is a brick, I can get my fist-like fingers to press the buttons!

    1. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by isorox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      where is the privacy?

      HELLO! I'M ON A TRAIN! I'LL BE HOME AT EIGHT!

      Yeah, plenty of privacy nowadays.

      How important is functionality on your arm to the general public? Note, on your arm it becomes useable with only one hand.

      What functionality do you need in a phone. I rarely use my actual phone, my bluetooth earpiece has one button that answers when it rings, hangs up when I'm talking, or activates voice dial when I'm not talking. Say the name of someone and the call connects. One finger to initiate the call, one finger to end the call, just as much privacy as a normal cell phone.

      A phone built into a watch would simply replace the current time with the calling name. Bluetooth means you can program it from your PDA or laptop, or some credit-card-sized keypad you can keep in your wallet.

      Really, what does a phone do? The only major function I use aside from phone calls is SMS, which I'd rather do through my PDA anyway (full keyboard for starters)

    2. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by keefey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, but doesn't it just smack of those 80's calculator watches that everybody seemed to have simply because they could? It seems to be the opposite direction of the way the current trends are going anyway - basically phones are having more and more functionality added (Symbian for a start), whereas this wearing lark seems to be stripping it out. I'm not complaining, it's nice to see some diversity in the market.

    3. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a smartphone. My PDA is my phone. My web browser is my phone. My camera is my phone. My MP3 player is my phone. One 266MHz device, one battery, all that functionality.

      Remember, the gist of the actual article has little to do with wrist phones per sei, rather that these devices are now small enough to be used in such a way, or in wearable clothing, purely to make them more convenient so you don't have to lug as many gadgets around with you.

      Of course if you use a PDA and a cellphone for sending SMS's, you probably fit into the 80% of people who are going to keep carrying a lot of baggage and a lot of different batteries for every gadget you have. So basically in order to have the same level of functionality you get from a single handset, you're carrying your handset, a bluetooth headset and a PDA?

      Which is fine of course, each to his own, but I'm very happy with the way convergence lets me carry all that functionality in one device.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    4. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by isorox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a phoen sucks as a PDA. Aside from the tiny screen, there is no decent way of inputting anything. Compare to a PDA with a built in keyoard (quite small admitably) and handwriting recognition that fits in your shirt pocket.

      One battery is great, but I'd rather know my phone will last 3 days then have a PDA-cum-phone-cum-mp3 player that lasts 12 hours.

      I typically carry 3 gadgets with me at any one time, phone (with built in camera, calander etc, none of which I use - I used the camera 4 times when I first got it but its a waste of time), mp3 player/flash stick (I lose it in my pocket its so small), and PDA in my jacket or shirt pocket (depending what I'm wearing).

      I dont know anyone (geek or non-geek) that uses their phone for anything more then phone calls and SMS (or PDA - GPRS connection). Actually, thats not entirely true, I use mine as an alarm clock sometimes too.

    5. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by utlemming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although some functionality is nice, these watches seem geared towards people who just use cells to talk. I have played with SMS, but personally I find it annoying and an invasion of my privacy. In the last two weeks I have got Porn and "Find out dirty secrets about your Friends" text messages. I bought a phone so that I could get a hold of people when I wanted to. And the thing has proved its value. But at the same time I haven't used my "vision enabled" crap. No need to. The thing that I have wanted for a long time is a phone which I could wear on my wrist. Then I wouldn't beat the thing to death. However, one thing that I think would be great would be to have cell phones with 4 megapixel cameras in them. That would kick some serious ace.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    6. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd like to order a dialing wand, mash the keypad now...

    7. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by smithmc · · Score: 1

      It's all well and good when you're on Omnicron-8, but on the train, heading towards Slough

      Slough? You live/work in Slough? You don't work at Wernham-Hogg, do you?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  13. Great. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thieves may now start ripping off peoples' earrings hoping to nab a cellphone.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    1. Re:Great. by keefey · · Score: 1

      Depends if it's one of those super new white ones, that say "iPod" on them.

    2. Re:Great. by isorox · · Score: 1

      My phone will be built into my socks, noone will ever steal them!

    3. Re:Great. by mr.scoot · · Score: 1

      Can I borrow your phone for a sec?
      Sure, here you go.
      *thunk*
      Whoops. Sorry, my phone's a bit ripe. It's been a long day.

  14. Wearable Cellphones? by Law1620 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now only if they could make wearable clothes...

    1. Re:Wearable Cellphones? by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Care to enlighten me as to your definition of wearable?

    2. Re:Wearable Cellphones? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Now only if they could make wearable clothes...

      The ancient Greeks and Egyptions had it pretty much down, and it's been all downhill every since.

      Fashion's a bitch, and then she wears it.

      KFG

  15. Re:I already by keefey · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the technical improvement, the result of pumping millions of dollars on research, didn't end up in "aaah, just stick it in a leatherette pouch and put your belt through it..."

  16. phones and talk ? by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    Weren't phones meant to talk ?

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  17. In a suppository? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just wondering, because I've seen bumper stickers like this:

    "Would you drive any better if i shoved that cell phone up your ass?"

    1. Re:In a suppository? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      Most people *would* mumble less...

    2. Re:In a suppository? by kfg · · Score: 1

      "Would you drive any better if i shoved that cell phone up your ass?"

      Well, maybe if you put it where their brains are they might have something worth talking about and shit.

      KFG

  18. nose-ring or on the face somewhere... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    then when u feel like punching the lights out of some a-hole who doesn't practice cell-phone ettiquette, u bust their lip and their phone....two birds with one punch.

  19. Can I... by Myrmi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Can I borrow your phone? I need to make a really important call!"
    "Sure!"
    *Removes phone from ear*
    "Uh.... never mind..."

    --
    "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
    1. Re:Can I... by dhalgren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or perhaps worse, for the bone-conduction model:

      "Can I borrow your phone? I need to make a really important call!"
      "Sure!"
      *Sticks finger in ear*
      "Uh.... never mind..."

  20. Aww great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just what I need, more people making those stupid thumb in the ear "I'll call you" signs.

    1. Re:Aww great... by Xconnect · · Score: 0

      You're mistaken. He's actually calling you! At least that's what the article implies...

      --
      --- root@127.0.0.1
  21. Voice recognition buttons by CraigGraham · · Score: 2, Interesting
    An alternative to these Star Trek-like technologies is voice recognition. Motorola has developed something it calls the SmartButton. The user pins the device onto a lapel, then taps on it and, using voice commands, dials a number and holds a conversation.


    The author has evidently little knowledge of Star Trek!
  22. Erm by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or do these articles seem less exciting WITHOUT PICTURES?

    1. Re:Erm by oacis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should look here:
      http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/conten t/04_26 /photo_essay/0426pe_wireless_a.htm

      Surprisingly - it was linked to in the article ;-)

      --
      This is NOT the best sig in the world, but this IS a tribute to the best sig in the world.
    2. Re:Erm by watzinaneihm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a picture of a watch phone being sold in India, Ugly if you ask me

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    3. Re:Erm by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the Wide World of Hypertext, son.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
  23. Big on the inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article..."A phone stitched into clothing or wrapped around a wrist could allow women to forego a purse."

    That must be some damn good phone for a woman not to need her purse...I guess it also holds tampons, 5 lipsticks, lube, etc.

    1. Re:Big on the inside by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of women you've been dating, but I want their numbers.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Big on the inside by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      You ain't lived until you've asked a woman for her driver's license in order to accept her check and she pulls a bottle of Chianti and a one pound jar of Vaseline out of her purse while she's looking for it.

      KFG

    3. Re:Big on the inside by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If she also pulls out a can of fava beans, run!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Big on the inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What kind of women wants a phone stiched into her clothes?

      "No, I haven't gained weight. That's my new phone!"

      Not a chance.

  24. Gentoo Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think this discovery is very exciting - imagine the possibility of putting gentoo linux on one of these devices!

    1. Re:Gentoo Linux. by paulkoan · · Score: 1


      Shouldn't that be "beowolf cluster of these"?

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Gentoo Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, I was going to call you but I was waiting for the 2.7.13 kernel to compile."

  25. wearable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    wear them and fry not only your brains, but also your heart and liver

  26. Just what we need... by penginkun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like we don't have enough moving hazards out there on the streets as it is. Now we're going to have women putting on makeup AND talking on the phone at the same time? Lord have mercy on us all.

    1. Re:Just what we need... by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      What do you mean going to have, I see women doing that all the time right now! ...And that's nothing compared to doing all of the above while balancing coffee and breakfast on the lap...

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    2. Re:Just what we need... by penginkun · · Score: 1

      Heh...reminds me of the time I saw a woman driving, talking on her phone and eating an ice cream cone at the same time. I got as far away from her as possible. Not that we men aren't guilty of similar offences. We're not slathering our faces with goo, but we have other bad habits.

    3. Re:Just what we need... by karnal · · Score: 1

      Like what?

      *scratch scratch scratch*

      --
      Karnal
  27. Uh... by SinaSa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't this strike anyone else as pretty, well..useless?

    Cellphone in a wrist-watch? How do I dial a number when I want to make a call? Or did someone suddenly decide the caclulator digital watch was a good model to follow?

    Or is there some attachable keypad you use to dial the number? Wait. You mean like a current phone and some handsfree earpieces, a speakerphone, or even a bluetooth headset?

    Inside ear-rings? Sorry, but I've seen the photos of that corporate executive lady who spent three or four hours on her cell every day. Nice cancerous ring around the ear section of the skull.

    --
    --
    The last digit of pi is four.
    1. Re:Uh... by hairykrishna · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Where did you see this photo? I'm sick of "cell phones fry your brain" scare stories when there's no damn evidence.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    2. Re:Uh... by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

      How do you usually 'dial' a number on a mobile?

      It's pretty common for people to have all their numbers stored to be accessed through menus and a jog dial. On the rare occasions you do actually need to put a number in, I don't see major difficulties with doing it using a jog dial (my old Sony Minidisc had this system for naming tracks).

      The difficulty would be with writing text but as the number keypad is itself a pretty poor input device and text messages are not really central to how I use a mobile, I don't see a big deal with a compromise in that area. Increasingly, you're likely to be importing numbers from different devices whether that's desktop, PDA, laptop or another phone. If your phone is Bluetooth-enabled you may well have a PDA or similar to use as an input device anyway.

      Mobiles have become take-everywhere devices in the same way as wristwatches were before them (and in fact I no longer wear a watch as the mobile does that job already). It makes sense from a functional/convenience point of view to strap a mobile to your wrist - just please don't make me have to hold it to my ear N Gage style or stick my finger in my ear to make calls.

    3. Re:Uh... by chrwei · · Score: 1

      Inside ear-rings? Sorry, but I've seen the photos of that corporate executive lady who spent three or four hours on her cell every day. Nice cancerous ring around the ear section of the skull.

      so put a bluetooth headset in the ear-ring and the phone in a pocket or something. This way the cancer forms around the reproductive organs and we solve some population explosion prolems too!

      --
      - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
    4. Re:Uh... by frank249 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this strike anyone else as pretty, well..useless? Cellphone in a wrist-watch? How do I dial a number when I want to make a call? Or is there some attachable keypad you use to dial the number?

      The technology already exists to have a HUD projected on your glasses or even using lasers to superimpose images directly on your retinas. Many cell phones already have voice dialing and for text messages there are
      projected keyboards

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  28. A Powder Case Is Wearable? by Jameth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the subject line is kinda all I had to say.

  29. *taps chest* - "One to beam aboard" by the_seal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Other wearable technologies coming soon: *Thigh mounted popcorn popper *Foldable stomach mounted TFT screen for my ass mounted, slim line nix box. *Bicep Juicer

  30. What an age we live in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that's possible we must really live in the future. A phone in your car that doesn't require you to actively touch. Wow. What will they think of next? A phone that doesn't need a cord?

  31. probably won't happen... by Geak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... because the F*cking Communications Commission would have to approve it. We all know it takes forever for that to happen. I can already hear them screaming - NO YOU CAN'T!!! YOU'LL BE CLOGGING UP THE EARWAVES!!!

  32. That boring "vision thing" by ites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else bored with designers trying to sell us their "visions"? What happened to asking people what they want and then making that cheaply and well?

    (I guess this would eliminate 75% of the mobile phone industry at a stroke, no more 3G, WAP, MMS, UMTS,... just free SMS and cheap voice)

    Mobile phones...? OK, here is what _I_ would like to see:

    1. Cheap, cheap, cheap. The damn things get lost and stolen too easily. If they cost $25 that'd be OK.

    2. Pretty in pink. Make them colored, even better, make it possible to print phone sheaths on an inkjet. Why the boring grey?

    3. Standardised: one single battery standard for all phones. One single micro plug for all phones. One single power supply for all phones. One single range of car kits, etc. Let's see Nokia and Sony-Ericsson and Siemens define a new standard "base" that frees us from having to keep separate chargers for each and every phone we buy. (Nokia has done this for its own phones, but that's not enough)

    4. Extensible rather than overpackaged. If I want a digital camera, MP3 player, PDA, let me add this to the phone. It'd be a lot easier if mobile phones had standard connections and some kind of docking system.

    Let me propose a new, radical design for mobile phones. First replace SIM cards with "core" modules that are the size of a phone battery pack. These cores conform to an industry standard and have the SIM card embedded in them, along with the bulk of the GSM electronics.

    The core can then be "sheathed" with anything from a $2.50 cover that provides just a keypad and headset jack, to a $2500 cover covered with diamonds.

    The development of a standard core will allow the cost to come way down and spawn an entire industry of add-on manufacturers, which is where the mobuile phone industry will make money again.

    Now if I, a simple Slashdotter, can come up with a plan to revolutionize the mobile phone industry, either I'm a genius, or the experts reviewed in this article are bumbling idiots, or both.

    Now I need another coffee. Make way!

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:That boring "vision thing" by dago · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. Well, cheapest phones cost around 50$ new here, unsubsidized.

      2. Done, Nokia 3200 has that, you can print your own cover.

      4. Done, look at all the various accessories for nokia/ericsson. They even have RC Cars

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    2. Re:That boring "vision thing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Big difference between buying proprietary extensions for one phone and to a standard. I can use my PC peripherals on all my PCs. But my phone peripherals rarely make it to the next phone from the same manufacturer let alone to one from a different manufacturer.

    3. Re:That boring "vision thing" by mt-biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Europe, at least, most of your wishes seem to be coming true.

      1. Cheap, cheap, cheap. The damn things get lost and stolen too easily. If they cost $25 that'd be OK.

      Yes, but only as long as you don't want MMS, UMTS, Bluetooth, etc. See below.

      2. Pretty in pink. Make them colored, even better, make it possible to print phone sheaths on an inkjet. Why the boring grey?

      Most phones can be bought in a range of colors and/or have interchangeable skins.

      3. Standardised: one single battery standard for all phones. One single micro plug for all phones. One single power supply for all phones.

      OK, chargers aren't there yet, and perhaps differences in battery technology make this difficult, but at least the data connections are becoming standardised thanks to Bluetooth. New BMWs just need the phone to be authenticated with the on-board computer and the car can then use the phone regardless of whether the phone is lying in the cradle or in your pocket.

      4. Extensible rather than overpackaged. If I want a digital camera, MP3 player, PDA, let me add this to the phone. It'd be a lot easier if mobile phones had standard connections and some kind of docking system.

      My Siemens S55 has a snap-on camera module with flash. I hate the thing, but that's just because the quality of the thing is crap and the connector is really dodgy. Again, Bluetooth could be the answer.

      Let me propose a new, radical design for mobile phones. First replace SIM cards with "core" modules that are the size of a phone battery pack. These cores conform to an industry standard and have the SIM card embedded in them, along with the bulk of the GSM electronics.

      The core can then be "sheathed" with anything from a $2.50 cover that provides just a keypad and headset jack, to a $2500 cover covered with diamonds.


      I think your core modules are going to be too inflexible. How about we modularise things a bit more - a small standardised storage device which we can attach to various phone electronics (to allow upgrades of the electronics, or a choice between folding, compact, and larger models with more features). Battery technology is becoming flexible with regard to shape and umm... flexibility, so let's keep that free-form too, since we want users to be able to choose between tiny devices and larger devices with a longer battery life. Best would be to allow the battery to clip on the to the electronic module.

      Now the people who would like a shiny, colored phone can buy the electronic module which allows the shells to be exchanged, whereas business users who don't care can go with boring grey where the integrated shell will be cheaper to manufacture.

      Oh, wait... that's sounding a lot like the status quo.

      Now if I, a simple Slashdotter, can come up with a plan to revolutionize the mobile phone industry, either I'm a genius, or the experts reviewed in this article are bumbling idiots, or both.

      I can think of another alternative. :)

      I suspect the mobile-phone market is one of the more market-driven industries out there, judging by the amount of competition and innovations we're seeing.

      Personally, I've just set up my first WLAN at home and find the freedom of being able to surf/work anywhere in the house just great (but what's with the chalk marks outside my front-door? ;). For me the next step would be to access my home network from my laptop _wherever_ I am. A Bluetooth/UMTS gateway over my cellphone could be just what I need, if the price was right...

    4. Re:That boring "vision thing" by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Forgot a couple things:
      1) Durable, so they don't fall apart. No little knobs or antennas sticking out so you can slip it into your pocket and go.
      2) Good reception. Make it work everywhere. Guarantee coverage in urban areas in buildings. Last time I checked most people like to use phones *inside*.
      3) Software that can detect random keypresses and stop input, so that if you put it in your pocket and forget to lock the keys, you won't end up calling your parents from the strip club. Uh... not that that happens to me a lot.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    5. Re:That boring "vision thing" by Analise · · Score: 1

      No little knobs or antennas sticking out so you can slip it into your pocket and go.

      Maybe it's just my phone, but...it has no knobs or an antenna sticking out, and it's compact enough to stick in my pocket and forget about it.

      Good reception. Make it work everywhere.

      And again, maybe it's just me, but...the only places I've yet to find that my cell doesn't work is way out in the boonies between towns where there's hardly anyone anyway. Inside, outside, all around the town/state/whatever, I've never really had problems with access. (for reference i'm with AT&T Wireless and my cell is a Nokia 3560 I got for free when I signed up with them)

      --
      >insert witty sig file here
    6. Re:That boring "vision thing" by skidv · · Score: 1

      1) cheap
      Why? More expensive models generate revenue and more profits.

      2) colors
      I think this is being done. See other posts

      3) standardized accessories
      Why? More products sold for new units generate more revenue and more profits.

      4) extendable
      Why? New features require you to upgrade your entire system and generates more sales and more profits.
      from another post
      5) durability
      Why? Devices that wear out generate more sales, revenue and profits. Besides, new features require phone upgrades anyway, they don't need to last forever.

      6) work everywhere
      Why? Vendor X thinks their protocol is better than vendor Y and all vendors benefit from protocol differences through additional sales, just because location A is supported by vendor X, vendor Y still makes a sale for that same location.

      In short, the vendors, who make these decisions do not benefit from any of these options suggested (except maybe number 2) because they reduce revenue and profits.

    7. Re:That boring "vision thing" by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Almost all phones can use GSM. That's a standard. I was talking about being able to get reception everywhere. That's my big beef.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  33. I missed them by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    And these phones could make it into the U.S. in the next year.

    Holy crap! You mean they have been in Europe for the last couple of years?

    1. Re:I missed them by g3n0m · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should check out Xelibri

  34. Seems like a good idea by Dizzle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idea of putting a finger in your ear would improve audio quality, would it not? I mean, when you plug your ear with your finger, it blocks out everything but low frequency sounds for the most part. Couldn't that make conversations, even in loud places, quite feasible?

    Just a little sidenote: what answer is that stupid guy expecting to his question? "Nope, can't hear you now." That's like saying "Whoever's not here, raise your hand." or "Are you asleep?"

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    1. Re:Seems like a good idea by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      The important question is whether or not you'd walk around in the mall with your finger in your ear.

      And what do you do when someone else wants to talk to whoever's on the phone? Or borrow your phone?

      I think i'll just stick with my Ericsson T100 for now.

    2. Re:Seems like a good idea by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Interesting point, but I'm sure that the intent is to create a device that you wear on the hand and uses the fingers as a speaker of sorts, *not* to implant the cell phone in your hand. In that event, you just take it off your hand (or wrist or whatever) and put it on theirs. Shouldn't be too difficult I think.

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  35. The Problem... by Walker2323 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that people just don't have any problems using a phone. We don't need these new little gagets. I love a new piece of tech as much as the next guy, but only if it's useful. These strike me as a gimmicky little idea whose uselessness will soon be apparent.

    1. Re:The Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the batteries. You see that power supply in your cell phone right now? How are you going to shrink that thing so that it fits in a wristwatch or powder case. Does a battery exist that can do that?

  36. Prior Art? by wonton_mein · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think somebody already has prior art:

    Wearable cell phone

  37. A New Age of Etiquette by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all of these tiny cell phones and people broadcasting their lives to the world as they talk, I'll have to wear my iPod all of the time just to be polite and respect their privacy! Oh well, at least I won't be able to hear the panhandlers...

  38. Free and Competitive Markets by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It doesn't matter how cool or technically advanced a cell phone is, the wireless carriers in the United States have a chokehold on the market. They want to force their subscribers to buy their phones only from the carrier's limited list of "approved" phones. This gives the carrier's marketing drones vast power over what phones and features are available. You don't buy a phone with the features that you want, you buy a phone that may have been crippled so that it fits in with the carrier's marketing strategy.

    The FCC needs to require all cellular carriers to activate any phone that meets the technical standards for their network.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Free and Competitive Markets by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      The FCC needs to require all cellular carriers to activate any phone that meets the technical standards for their network.
      More to the point, the FCC needs to put an end to phone locking. (ending contracts would be nice, too) Any technically capable phone should be able to be used on any compatible network.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    2. Re:Free and Competitive Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The FCC needs to require all cellular carriers to activate any phone that meets the technical standards for their network.

      bollocks. Use any GSM phone working at 1900 MHz (assuming the phone's not locked, but that wouldn't be the fault of the carrier you're trying to use at the moment) on any US GSM network--Cingular/AT&T, T-Mobile, or anyone else that might be using GSM.

      Granted this doesn't help most CDMA users ... but my experience from Verizon customers is they don't actually want feature-filled phones (the ones that did, left--the rest are complaining that they still have colored screens).

  39. *fap* *fap* *fap* by Suchetha · · Score: 4, Funny
    The technology also would allow users to dial phone numbers or send text messages by tapping their palms in certain ways.

    oh.. *pant* *pant* *pant* sorry.. *pant*pant* wrong number... *click*

    Suchetha
    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  40. Mod parent UP by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's too true, painfully true...

  41. Sniff Sniif - I smell vapourware . . . . by Tetsugaku-San · · Score: 1

    When the show me a phone thats the size of a watch but as easy to use as my Sony Ericsson P900 - I'll take notice - until then this tech is restricted to rabid first adopters and Star Trek fans. 20% of Mobiles by 2007 - hell we're not all that foolish ya know.

  42. Part way there already by panurge · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have artilleryman's ear, and I use an in-ear hearing aid. I use a neck microphone (under my shirt) on my cell phone with an inductive loop, so phone speech comes directly into my ear. Unlike a Bluetooth unit, the battery life is weeks. Because the hearing aid is music grade, the sound quality is vastly better than you get with the tiny speakers on cell phones. The result is that I can answer the phone and talk with no visible phone at all. I still derive minor pleasure from the shock of some people watching this madman talking to himself, but the fact is, it works extremely well. The microphone is shielded and has good noise rejection, and on the T setting I can block out external sounds and hear perfectly in very noisy environments. The one thing I would really like is an external keypad I could velcro to a jacket, or a better voice dialing system than the (frankly crappy) Nokia 6310 the company provides.

    There are few benefits of middle aged deafness, but this is one of them.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  43. Evil Phones!! by iR-Corp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a MAJOR problem with privacy, these things are so small you could slip them into a handbag or wallet even and record an entire conversation, and if they have the SUPA COOL video FONE then the Ped's will go ballistic. Screw small phones, i lose mine enough as is. Respec.

    1. Re:Evil Phones!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a MAJOR problem with privacy, these things are so small you could slip them into a handbag or wallet even and record an entire conversation, and if they have the SUPA COOL video FONE then the Ped's will go ballistic. Screw small phones, i lose mine enough as is. Respec.

      Lemme guess, your homo's dissed you so you came here to rap and get some respect?

      Friggin wanna-ba gansta who also is a wanna-be tech-head. Bet you end up as somebody's ho' in the slammer.

  44. fashion disaster by RocketRainbow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    when will you tech boys learn? I have dozens of pairs of earrings! Now supposing I switch to the earring phone: this means I have to buy dozens of phones! And they'll still be dodgy looking if current phone design is anything to go by. So when I go out, I wear my ordinary earrings, and now I have to carry a phone anyway. More phones! Any wearable technology suffers from this limitation: I have 3 watches, 7 handbags and even a couple of wallets. Oddly enough, since I practically live in my Mary Janes, perhaps a shoe phone is in order...? "Hello.. Chief?"

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
    1. Re:fashion disaster by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      when will you tech boys learn? I have dozens of pairs of earrings! Now supposing I switch to the earring phone: this means I have to buy dozens of phones!

      And you think the cell companies won't want to sell you dozens of phones to go with all of your outfits?

      Congratz, you broke the code!

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  45. Codec Frequency 140.85 by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 1

    Come on, think about how much ass this kicks. Now I can fulfill my Solid Snake fantasies. In all seriousness, this wouldn't look anywhere near as bad as the side-talker. By the time the technology has developed enough for the consumer market it would probably be enough to just place it over the aural opening, one wouldn't have to shove their finger in up to their first knuckle.

  46. Nice and All But Practical??? NOOOO by DeICQLady · · Score: 1

    When people get their etiquette together, I'll welcome this . . . but I'm not looking forward to being abused on the train/bus in the restaurant with information about who fired who, and which exec is visiting his mistress every night. And it's not like the ones of us that are guilty are gonna check into an etiquette clinic.

  47. Touchdown!! by slumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe now I won't feel so weird about using my Sports Illustrated shoe phone.

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  48. This is not new by ag0ny · · Score: 1

    The Sanyo TS41 does this since some time ago. It has a "speaker" that you place on your skull (not necessarily near the ear) and allows you to hear the phone even on very noisy places. In fact that's what the TV commercial was focusing on.

    There's an article (in Japanese) with very funny photos here. :)

  49. India's First Camera Watch Phone by sanspeak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reliance Infocomm a CDMA cellular provider from India has introduced one such wearable CDMA based mobile phone Telson TWC 1150. This mobile is also supported by Supports unique RUIM Card that can be used in a GSM handset for International Roaming.

  50. So much for hands-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So with that 'phone you can't even balance the headset your shoulder to free you hand.

    Think about it: how often during normal calls do you take you hand away from the headset for a minute to pick up a pen, or type something, or steer the car... With this wonderful technology your hand becomes part of the telephone and must be dedicated exclusively to the 'phone for the duration of the conversation.

    Hell, you can't even switch hand, transferring the headset from one hand to the other.

    A cool technology that is just not useful.

  51. Re:The BEST place I'd want it IN OTHERS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neural interface ala Deus Ex's JC Denton and Bullfrog's Syndicate. Then you can hijack people's motor functions and run 'em into walls all day. Persuade-a-tron here we come....

    (They have done this with cockroaches)

  52. Two-Fer by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    A cell phone in a powder case? In a wrist watch? Inside your earring?

    First 'Dick Tracy' Reference Post!

    A cell phone in a powder case? In a wrist watch? Inside your earring?

    In your jeans! In your cheeseburgers! In your Nutty Buddys! Cellphones are EVERYWHERE!

    Michael J. Fox has no cell phone in him...

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  53. $400 calculator watches by RKBA · · Score: 1
    "Ah, but doesn't it just smack of those 80's calculator watches that everybody seemed to have simply because they could?"

    You mean like THIS one for $399.99? I misplaced the manual for my Casio CFX-200 scientific calculator watch a few days ago and in the process of looking for a manual on the web, I ran across the Ebay advertisement above for one of those 80's calculator watches. To the best of my knowledge, no one has manufactured a scientific calculator watch (try finding one!) since Casio made the CFX-200. Mine is serial number 579857. :-)

  54. Maxwell Smart was ahead of his time by cervo · · Score: 2

    He had a shoe phone all those years ago and people could always tell him as "the agent with the shoe phone". Well now everyone has shoe phones so all the agents will have them. It just took all these years to catch on, he was a man ahead of his time :)

    So all of you go watch reruns of Get Smart again keeping in mind that you too can have a shoe phone just like Agent 86. I don't think it was a cell phone though, but it was the first wearable phone I ever saw and it was pretty cool for coming so early.

    I wonder what other technologies dreamed up as fiction in the old days are reality today that we take for granted.

  55. Borrow the phone by $exyNerdie · · Score: 2, Funny


    *Can I borrow your phone?*

    *Uh Yeah, here you go* ::Sticks his finger in her ear::

  56. "Hymie, Snap off that light" by HBPiper · · Score: 1

    "Sorry about that Chief."

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  57. Uh, is this not a response to users? by ianscot · · Score: 1
    I'm pretty sure a significant number of people are saying "Give me something I don't fumble for in my purse when I get a call." (Otherwise stated as: "The damn things get lost or stolen too easily," to quote a wise person I once read...)

    Wearable phones are an attempt to answer that request from users. Yes? And the "vision" is when the designers try to figure out how to do it.

    Your general "standardised" and "extensible not overpackaged" points are what you'd call "creative tensions" across basically all technological markets. (MSWord/PDAs/digital cameras are overpackaged, should be more extensible in features or software -- you could say it about products in most niches.) Meeting a price point is pretty obvious. And skinning has been around for many years, especially in phones which were among the first products to get that idea.

    Your "core modules" would be roughly analogous to asking computer manufacturers to all use the same motherboard configurations or graphics cards. The problem's the same sort of leapfrogging standards one we see in basically everything. The business model could work if you wanted to try to take the low end of the market, assuming you could get enough accessory companies to support your first core module release. It's not gonna get supported across the entire market; Motorola isn't going to shut down its plants and make the same chips as someone else. They all view their proprietary models as a competitive advantage, to start with. In two years whatever standard we've all locked into will be unable to support whatever (granted, lame) new accessory people are apparently willing to buy, God bless their little consumer-confidence-boosting souls. And someone's going to want to make a killing on that (granted, stupid) high-end of the market.

    When you get the phone industry to buy into this, though, talk to someone about GE's Autonomy 'skateboard' base for cars. The base of the car can take a wide variety of flavors on top. Think Toyota will want to go into the business of selling accessories for GM's chassis?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  58. subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a cellphone/butt plug combination!

  59. Like on Knight Rider! by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I've been waiting for this since the 1980s. Just pull my left wrist up toward my chin and speak loudly into my watch: "KITT, I'm in trouble!"

  60. I guess I'm a Luddite by krgallagher · · Score: 1

    Can you be a Luddite and a programmer too? You see I do not own a Cell Phone. I don't want one. The very idea that people could call me with a reasonable expectation of reaching me 24/7 is abhorent. I don't like talking to people on phones in the first place. Hey, maybe it is not the technology but the people that is the problem...

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

    1. Re:I guess I'm a Luddite by HalfStarted · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Owning a cell phone != being reachable 24/7. For a long time I felt the same way you did and avoided purchasing a cell phone, eventually we changed on call procedures at work which required having a company provided phone while you were on your on-call shift. The upside of this is that we were allowed to use the phones for personal use as well since they had a generous number of minutes on them. I realized a couple of things after having the phone for a while...

      The convenience of a cell phone is amazing. Cell phones can be very, very handy when you are meeting people on the go or want to do something spontaneously. They are great to have with you on long drives in case of emergencies, and for staying in touch while traveling.

      There is no rule that you always have to keep your phone with you, that you always have to keep it on, or that you always have to answer it. It is really no different than your normal phone except now you have the OPTION to take it with you. I have not once encountered someone that expected me to answer just because I have a cell phone. That is, after all, what voice mail is for.

      Not wanting a cell phone is fine, land lines in most areas are still preferable for some uses (if you have the line for DSL already, if your area does not have enhanced 911... etc.) and if you do not talk to others often then it may not be worth the cost to pay for two phone services. But honestly the argument "I do not want to be connected 24/7" is rather silly when you think about it.

      --


      Have you thought for yourself today?
  61. Edible phones by CrimeaRiver · · Score: 1

    Wearable phones? That's so 2003. I recently saw a street guy in Paris talking into a banana.

    1. Re:Edible phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was just happy to see you..

  62. However by phorm · · Score: 1

    The phone could have vibrate mode, which would replace at least one of the heavier items from said purse.

    So maybe we couldn't eliminate the purse entirely, but at least size it down a bit.

  63. Re:Seems like a good idea (OT) by geekboy2k · · Score: 1

    Let me tell you what that commercial REALLY means. "Can you hear me now" is what you say as you wander around the house/yard trying to get the feeble signal to actually carry your conversation. 8*) (Verizon customer in SmallTown, USA)

  64. Talking using the finger bones is nice, but... by Bilange · · Score: 1

    I prefer Wristomo, even if the watch itself seems bigger. I would hate to have some wire connected on the watch

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
  65. I can't keep up by Mannerism · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look, I just stopped wearing a wristwatch because my cell phone has a clock in it. Now you want me to stop wearing a cell phone because my wristwatch is going to have a phone in it. Make up your damn minds.

  66. Already happens by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I actually know quite a few girls who have bought new cellphones because the old one is, well, older, and not as cute as the new design. No, the reception isn't better, and they don't use any of the bazillion extra features, but they wanted a cuter phone.

    Cellphones are part of a fashion trend... I know the parent was a joke but it wouldn't be unheard of for people to buy newer phones that are "in fashion"

  67. Oh cool by tr0p · · Score: 1
    now I can get one of those wires like agent Smith

    My only regret... is that I have... bonitis...

    --

    My only regret... is that I have... bonitis..

  68. Do people really use this stuff? by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...uses a hand's bone structure to make a wrist watch phone easier to manage and operate. Here's how it works: When a call arrives, the phone sends vibrations through the bones in the index finger. When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice

    "No, I'm not flipping you off, my phone is ringing..."

    ..U.S. consumers, always behind the Old World in most things wireless, have been left out.

    The mental image cracks me up. I can't imagine walking by someone talking with a finger in their ear and not chuckling to myself. Do people actually use this stuff?

    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
  69. Won't Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the "forced disconnections" caused by slapping someone's hand away from their ear. The sheer amount of damage done to the ear alone would prevent it from reaching the mainstream without heavy frivolous lawsuits.
    Also, what happens when someone gets into a car accident while using this? They could be deaf for life when their jammed-in finger gets jammed in further or even stuck permanently.
    Laugh now, pay later.

  70. Dear citizen - by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 2, Funny

    We trust that you have been enjoying the benefits of your Eartrans 5.2 implant. You will no doubt have received a message from OCS Non-industrial requesting backpayment for use of patents without permission.

    We wish to assure you that we will continue to fight these claims so that you may avoid the surgery required for a firmware downgrade.

    Faithfully

    B. L. Owngasket (acting chairman)

    P.S. Please contact us if you would like to take advantage of a special offer on our new 5.6 beta
    implant. This device offers similar performance with reduced running costs, subsidised by irregular broadcasts from our new sponsors:

    Igo Tcha marketing - a subsidiary of OCS Non-industrial.

    Be seeing you!

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  71. Star Trek by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    They used to call us geeks when we told them we thought those touch-pins were cool! Give it some time, and all the "in-crowders" who called us geeks will be using them.
    I guess geeks are just ahead of their time? Bust out the pocket protectors boys, it's time for some brie and fondo :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  72. This is not new by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Ask several people who didn't turn off their cell phones in movie theatres, restaurants, etc. but instead made some dismissive gesture while continuing to shout into said phone in an inappropriate place.

    Purists will argue that "rectally implanted" is not the same as "worn" but as far as *I* am concerned it's poTAYto, poTAHto...

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  73. Is this really any better than bluetooth headsets? by Simon+Spero · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've had people mistake my Motorola HS810 headset for jewlery before

    Leaving aside a few bugs in Motorola's bluetooth implementation, it seems to me that there's not much difference between a true wearable and a phone that you never have to take out of your pocket.

    Simon

    of course, I wear a lot of cargo pants, and I only got the V600 because my nokia 9290 died and I couldn't get hold of a 9500, so I'm probably not a good test case

  74. Wearable Cell Phones Are Here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tinfoil hat is right.

    If I wear it on a string around my neck, then I'll probably get breast cancer as opposed to ear or butt cancer.

  75. The solution is simple. by PCM2 · · Score: 1
    Of course, my people are also known for their other weirdnesses, such as a religion that believes the spirits of our dead ancestors haunt the streets picking up the shit of the living and eating it.
    Stop shitting on public streets. Problem solved! Now how hard was that?
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  76. transduction bone mic by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    transduction bone mic's would be sweet

  77. What we're not thinking about... by cmeans · · Score: 1
    ...well, some of us anyway...

    is that given this new ability to have phones built into every day items:

    1. We may have more than one "on" at a time
    2. We'll want the ability to decide which one is active at any given time
    3. We'll need the ability to set the phone # for each "device" so we can use different ones at different times
    4. We'll loose these phones and break them more easily than we do the regular ones

    My understanding is that in Europe/Asia, their phones already use a SIM card or something to more easily change the number, billing etc.. So we'll want that sort of technology here to, but a SIM card seems like it may be too big for some of the applications I've heard of, but maybe there would be a central device (hopefully small and handy) to control all the other little phone devices. Earrings for speaker, watch or ring or lapell for mic. Watch or ring for dial...

  78. FACK YOU!!! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Yeah I got a wearable cell phone. I put it in a pouch which I can wear on my belt. That's wearable, you stupid fock.

  79. Smart by mfh · · Score: 1

    > 1. Cheap, cheap, cheap. The damn things get lost and stolen too easily. If they cost $25 that'd be OK.

    That would be great for my use. They don't have to be ultra expensive for my tates... they just have to function properly and be remotely good.

    > 2. Pretty in pink. Make them colored, even better, make it possible to print phone sheaths on an inkjet. Why the boring grey?

    Foldable, printable phone sheaths. I think you just made a million dollars.

    > 3. Standardised: one single battery standard for all phones. One single micro plug for all phones. (etc)

    I agree 100%. When are hardware mfctrs gonna learn that they need to follow the w3.org in their standards for the web, over to the hardware side of things. Stop competing with competitors on style, and locking customers into service by changing the designs of hardware to make them incompatible on purpose. Just think of what it would be like if you owned the company that has all their products parts interchangable to a public standard! All the other companies would follow, much like how everyone follows Google these days.

    > 4. Extensible rather than overpackaged.

    With the new Microsoft skin bus, this should be easy enough to accomplish, for a high price. But still... cool enough. :-)

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.