Slashdot Mirror


Helix Player and RealPlayer 10 Released

kforeman writes "The RealPlayer 10 for Linux and its underlying 100% open source Helix Player are now both finalized. The RealPlayer 10 for Linux has many new features including a Mozilla plug-in, so you can now enjoy all those embedded media clips, as well as the latest RealAudio 10, RealVideo 10, MP3, Flash, and Ogg Vorbis and Theora support. The Helix Player is 100% open source, (now including the GPL!) and includes support for SMIL 2.0 and open source codecs Ogg Vorbis and Theora. Our goal is to make the Linux desktop a first class citizen and we think today's releases are a good first step in that direction."

323 comments

  1. Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats...buffering buffering...great!

    1. Re:Good news by erick99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I used to dislike RealAudio as much as anybody else but the most recent release of their player is actually very good and does not assault me with ads or offers to upgrade anywhere near the extent that the older ones did. I have used MS MediaPlayer quite a bit but recently found that RealPlayer seemed to have more codecs or was able to auto-install them with greater ease than MediaPlayer. Hell, I could be wrong about how that works. But, my user experience is that Real's player is a pretty nice "product" at this point and, at times, has helped me listen/watch something sooner that I otherwise would have. This is just my two cents worth, a personal opinion at best. I am far from a Real Audio "apologist." I understand Real's history and was as annoyed as anyone else in the past. But, I don't mind revisiting something once in a while to see where it's at and I have found the current RealPlayer to be a good product.

      Cheers!

      Erick

      P.S. Yes, I know I should look at some of the other non-MS/Real players out there and will do so.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:Good news by ralphart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hmm...Since Helix has been open-sourced, what's to stop someone from porting it to Windows, so one could dispense with RealPlayer and all the goop it installs? Is it just me or does that makes some kind of sense? Not that I'm advocating running Windows or anything, mind you!

    3. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just wanted to create a simple player you could go right ahead and compile the Helix/Real Player for windows - and use GTK on windows.

      The player does compile I believe, check the forums on the player project site.

    4. Re:Good news by bogado · · Score: 1

      Mine goes :

      "
      the following components are required:
      html

      URL:
      mem://http://videos.tf1.fr/video....
      "

      trying to watch any of the videos from the TF1 site. I want to train my french.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    5. Re:Good news by Kristoffer+Lunden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, on Windows, there is probably no better player than Media Player Classic, which already can run Real stuff via Real Alternative. Also, mplayer is available for windows, though I've not tried playing Real with it outside Linux.

      As for Real themselves, I kinda like what they are doing now, but old grudges die hard. I am torn between wanting to support people doing the right thing and feeling they haven't been punished nowhere near enough for past things yet.

    6. Re:Good news by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 0, Redundant

      OMG, that's fucking hilarious! I was [buffering] sitting here [buffering] thinking of [buffering] a [buffering] buffering joke [buffering] of m[buffering]y own and wouldn't ya [buffering] know it? Someone [buffering] already [buffering] got [buffering] to [buffering] it.

      --
      R(k)
    7. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what sort of moron marks that as funny?

      The only reason real has a history of buffering is because we never used to have the bandwidth available with modems etc. real buffers no more than any other codec, so stop marking such things as funny and mark them troll as they should be.

    8. Re:Good news by Homology · · Score: 1
      Hmm...Since Helix has been open-sourced, what's to stop someone from porting it to Windows, so one could dispense with RealPlayer and all the goop it installs?

      The codecs are still binary, so there you are.

    9. Re:Good news by radbrad · · Score: 1

      The first thing that springs to my mind is that it is now possible for something like MPlayer to examine the helix libraries, etc. and tighten up their support for Real Media?

      or have i missed the bus and this has happened already?

      --
      -- P'thk! http://radbrad.rucus.net/
    10. Re:Good news by pavon · · Score: 1

      Probably not. The open source Helix Player cannot play Real Media file formats, only open ones like Ogg Vorbis, etc. To play the Real Media formats you must use the proprietary Real Player binary. So basically Helix is no different than MPlayer in that the open source part of it isn't very usefull by itself without the binary codecs. AFAIK, Real doesn't distribute a binary dll of their codecs, just the full application, which makes it more difficult to support than the rest of the codecs and I don't see how having the Helix will help with that.

    11. Re:Good news by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      If you have RealPlayer 10 media player classic will make use of the already installed DLLs as well.

      You might want to note that you're violating the EULA when you use Real Alternative, as they redistribute the DLLs without the player (and for the same reason, mplayer also violates quite a few EULAs ;). While this might not actually be a cause for concern, it's important to note that if you ever do install the full RealPlayer it seems RealAlternative causes major conflicts.

      This is all stuff that Real engineers that work on the video codecs have mentioned publicly (I am not an engineer for Real)

  2. THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot uses Slashcode running on Apache with a MySQL backend. All of these packages are OPEN SOURCE, and therefore the odds of errors occurring are VIRTUALLY ZERO! On top of the impecable software, this site is maintained like a finely tuned machine by some of the most brilliant administrators and programmers the human race has to offer! I'm sick of these rumors about server errors! THEY ARE LIES!

  3. Move along. by dotwaffle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone else get a "Nothing to see here. Move along." notice? That was sooooo weird!

    1. Re:Move along. by cytoman · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Me too! I thought I must have clicked some other link by mistake. A gesture and a click corrected it.

      I wonder how many people saw the "Nothing to see here. Move Along" notice...

    2. Re:Move along. by dotwaffle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Did you give it the finger or were you using Opera at the time? ;) I do like Opera, if only it would support some kind of roaming profile system, so I could log in and all my bookmarks etc would be there... hint hint...

    3. Re:Move along. by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I get that, and occasionally a "503 service is unavailable". I know they moved servers recently, but this is getting annoying not getting my nerd news fix on demand.

      --
      ymmv
  4. Helix! by byolinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope to play with this later.

    Could this be the beginning of a multimedia framework for GNU/Linux?

    1. Re:Helix! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Could this be the beginning of a multimedia framework for GNU/Linux?

      Try Gstreamer for that.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Helix! by LightStruk · · Score: 2, Informative
      Could this be the beginning of a multimedia framework for GNU/Linux?
      Is the existing multimedia framework not good enough for you?
    3. Re:Helix! by sloanster · · Score: 1

      This could indeed be a good thing - note however that applications like xine and mplayer, when properly configured and installed, already provide a full multimedia experience for the savvy linux user, but it's good to get something with the commercial visibility of real into the picture - let's hope it attracts enough interest to gain critical mass.

    4. Re:Helix! by atlantis191 · · Score: 1

      Is the existing multimedia framework not good enough for you?

      Parent never said that one never existed. They merely offered up the question that a new one might be getting started. Isn't having different options and choices Linux's whole mantra anyways?

    5. Re:Helix! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I alwasy have problems with GStream under Fedora Core 2. It won't play DVD's or othere videos. When I use RythmBox (uses gstream as a backend) to play ogg/mp3 files, my CPU usage stays around 15% - 20%. If I play the same song in XMMS, mpg321, mplayer, etc, the CPU usage is always between 0% - 1%. GStreamer looks promising, but still has some ways to go for day to day usage IMO.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    6. Re:Helix! by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      The beginning of a proprietary codec-friendly one, yes.

      But GNU users have already had multimedia frameworks available in aRts, Xine, MPlayer, and GStreamer.

    7. Re:Helix! by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Is Helix friendly to proprietary formats?

      MPlayer and Xine are too, right?

      "GStreamer aims to support every format imaginable"

      While I'd love to see an end to proprietary formats, I can't see an end to people wanting to play them anytime soon, unfortunately.

    8. Re:Helix! by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      Helix is more friendly to proprietary codecs than anything else I listed.

      GStreamer and aRts arguably don't allow proprietary codecs at all because of GPL linking issues.

      The mplayer people seem to be quite vigilant in defending their license.

      Xine I admit I'm not sure of.

      I think you confuse patented formats with proprietary codecs. It's possible to have a free-software implementation of a proprietary format. It's possible to have a proprietary implementation of a proprietary format.

      In the case of Helix, the whole idea is to wrap as much free software as possible around the proprietary implementation (binary codec) of the proprietary format (Real's formats).

  5. Awesome! by cytoman · · Score: 2, Funny
    The best news so far today...

    Does this mean Real will release how it hacked into iTunes/iPod?

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We may be getting iTunes direct from Apple:

      http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=578

    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running itunes in wine can hardly be considered having it directly from apple.

    3. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Does this mean Real will release how it hacked into iTunes/iPod?
      They already have. They used publicly available information.
  6. excellent! by hoborocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now I don't have to use that pesky, non-intrusive, non-commerical, non-irritating, non-email-address-asking Xine!

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:excellent! by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Xine tends to lose sync when I use it for RA, especially if I am doing something else on the PC at the same time (placing the PC under load). The Real player can handle that.

      The effect is: whatever I am listening to comes out completely garbled. I have to terminate and restart Xine.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    2. Re:excellent! by groomed · · Score: 5, Informative

      RealPlayer 10 doesn't ask for your email address anymore. I just installed it. It looks decent enough.

      Also support for playing Real media formats in Xine/mplayer still isn't quite as reliable as the real thing. Not to mention the browser plugin support. Finally Xine/mplayer can be a bitch to install.

      I like what Real's doing. RealPlayer 10 is like the RealPlayer 1.0 that never was.

    3. Re:excellent! by LordK2002 · · Score: 1
      It also seems impossible to skip forward or back in a Real stream played with mplayer, unless you quit and restart with an adjusted URL ("http://wherever.ram?start=00:12").

      I have not tried Helix yet, but this could be a godsend when playing back radio shows of the BBC websites. No more cutting and pasting the contents of RAM files into the command line to start mplayer.

      K

    4. Re:excellent! by groomed · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw some patches coming by on the mplayer-dev mailing list that purportedly implement seeking for Real streams, but I don't know if they ever made it in and/or how reliable they are. Other than that there are sync problems (as the other poster mentioned), connection problems (with rtsp:// in particular, yes, the live.com libs sorta work, no, sorta isn't good enough), stability problems, and assorted minor brokennesses.

      I love mplayer but of all the formats it supports, Real is perhaps the worst.

    5. Re:excellent! by andreyw · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. Helix is non-intrusive, non-commercial, non-irritating, non-email-address-asking.

    6. Re:excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now I don't have to use that pesky, non-intrusive, non-commerical, non-irritating, non-email-address-asking Xine!

      God, could we be a little more open minded please? Maybe you should try the actual software before badmouthing it?

    7. Re:excellent! by PDA_Monkey · · Score: 1

      When they ask for an email address, they tell you exactly what they want to see, so I give it to them:
      "name@company.com"

      --
      Hallo, My name is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to die!
    8. Re:excellent! by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      Whenever I install a new system one of the packages I always emerge is mplayerplug-in. The latest releases have been great, and bring browser-embedded video playing in Linux at least up to par with the options in Windows, if not better. http://mplayerplug-in.sourceforge.net/

  7. So..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Who needs the real Realplayer anyway? I mean, seriously...

    1. Re:So..? by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Who needs RealPlayer?

      People Like Me [tm] who have convinced our significant others that broadband is more important than cable or satellite television!

      I'm quite happy with Real Player.

      I do however need something to watch or listen to from time to time. I've always listened to Air America Radio with it. I just moved into a new place and can't really afford cable television right now. However for less than 20 bucks a month I do get a whole bunch of media and get it on demand. (SuperPass, however I'm on the trial now)

      I watched the Convention with it, listen to Jazz with it - all with "Tivo" like control. Right now I'm listening to Al Franken and listening to it from 30 minutes ago. A feature many streaming audio clients don't support.

      If I can use the Helix DRM module I'll use it. Sure, DRM is scarry for a lot of people. But when it allows me to download 100 movies from Starz! a month for just $14... that is cool. (Live streams of Starz! also) Also I hate being forced into Windows. Just don't force me to run the DRM features as root, we're cool.

      VoIP from the cable company? Nah... TVoIP from the phone company.

      With 3Mb/s from the phone company for $45 a month you can get all of your "living room" needs from your computer.

    2. Re:So..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, Live-Streams do rock! I mainly use Winamp for it however.

      Just checked the link you posted. Its cool - and it works with Real Alternative (thats right, I'm still on Windooze! :)

      But then again, maybe the Real Alternative-Build relies on Helix...and so its a Good Thing(TM) after all!
      BTW: Yes, I am jealous about the going-back in the stream-feature... :)

    3. Re:So..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. You sound like you're totally unaware of all the other options out there. Realplayer is pathetic compared to the other Linux media options.

    4. Re:So..? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of the other options, and most I like.

      Real Player for linux is pretty pathetic compared to Xine et. al. but then again none handle Real Media like Real Player does. Go figure.

      If there was a real RealPlayer 10 for linux, like the Windows version, I'd be happy.

      In fact, I've always shunned Real Player, even for Windows. At first they were in a class to their own but then were stale. As they've fought against Microsoft and Apple, I've come back.

      At least they offer a Linux version though. They could just say "tough crackers".

  8. wow I'm confused! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can a company that used to be so evil (spyware, user statistics reported without knowledge, etc) suddenly be doing good things like open source?

    Maybe it's an honest new attitude... stranger things have happened!

    1. Re:wow I'm confused! by SoTuA · · Score: 4, Funny
      You new around here?

      Two words: IBM.

    2. Re:wow I'm confused! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Two words: IBM.

      You new around here?
      That's one acronym.
      </detail nazi>

    3. Re:wow I'm confused! by What'sInAName · · Score: 1
      You new around here?

      Two words: IBM.

      IBM what!?!?!?!?! C'mon, you said two words, so where's the second one? Don't keep us in suspense! ;-)

    4. Re:wow I'm confused! by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      That ain't two words, that's three!

      /men on film

    5. Re:wow I'm confused! by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Perhaps you're meant to add rocks/sucks depending on what period you're talking about: eg.

      Past: IBM SUCKS!!!!
      Present: IBM ROCKS!!!1

    6. Re:wow I'm confused! by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's propably their last chance. If Linux succeeds as desktop OS, their player is the only one (at least the only mature one) available.
      Windows comes with WMP (QT also beeing scusessfull) and Mac OS comes with QT.
      There are only Linux and other unixy OSes left for Real to be the default Player.

      I saw a statistic a few weeks ago. According to that, Windows Media and QuickTime are more or less tied with a litte less than 40% market share.
      Real had a little more than 20%.

      BTW: HelixPlayer is only developed for Linux/x86 and Symbian (other ports are untested).
      I don't see a full Helix Player for Windows or Mac OS. (Windows has a very simple Helix Client) Users of these OSes should - according to Real - get the full RealPlayer.

  9. Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, this is all well and good. But I've been wondering:

    Why bother with Helix when there are other freely-availble, open-source alternatives (e.g., mplayer, xine) that appear equally capable of supporting a variety of player formats?

    1. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      repeat after me: more open source code is a GOOD thing.

    2. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why bother with Helix when there are other freely-availble, open-source alternatives (e.g., mplayer, xine) that appear equally capable of supporting a variety of player formats?

      Why bother with IE, or Oracle, or MSWindows?
      Some people just like a choice.

    3. Re:Neat. by AirP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And along those lines... why linux when we have windows!

    4. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      because mplayer is infamous for it's inclusion of questionable codecs. xine is pretty much more of the same. distributors like redhat (and fedora) are looking for media players that are as GPL friendly and LEGAL as possible.

      a player that only does Ogg[Vorbis|Theora] falls quite nicely into that slot.

      does anyone know about the ability to create plugins? it'd be great to have a unified player that takes easy mp3/xvid/dvd plugins.

    5. Re:Neat. by kc8tbe · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Personally, I don't have any plans to use the Helix player in it's current state. Why bother, when I can already view (and even rip) my favorite Real streams with my Mplayer and Xine browser plugins? And yes, I'm suspicious of Real playing nice with OSS all of a sudden...

      Perhaps the Helix player is better suited to the Syllable project (http://www.syllable.org).

    6. Re:Neat. by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why bother with Helix when there are other freely-availble, open-source alternatives (e.g., mplayer, xine) that appear equally capable of supporting a variety of player formats?

      Have you actually tried HelixPlayer, or the RealPlayer for Linux? They are, in fact, very nice, with simple clean minimalist interfaces using GTK. No ugly skinning, no bizarre file selection dialogs (just plain GTK file selection dialogs), no relying on keyboard shortcuts.

      I like Mplayer, and I use it a lot, but HelixPlayer really is very nice, and I'm using it more and more. Don't knock it until you've tried it. Real seems to have turned a corner here and gone open source. HelixPlayer is a great open source project, and the RealPlayer based on it is not the intrusive email collecting mess that one used to associate with Real.

      I know many here hate Real, and it's understandable given their previous efforts, but they do seem to have changed, and I think they're worthy of a second chance here... now if only they'd free up their codec...

      Jedidiah.

    7. Re:Neat. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Real seems to have turned a corner here and gone open source.

      Translation: Real is being chased down a street by hordes of angry computer users. In an attempt to escape, it 'turns a corner' into an alleyway and spies a box of discarded theater props. Quickly, Real finds a white hat (*) and a Groucho Marx glasses-and-moustache disguise (**) and puts them on.

      As the hordes rush past the entrance to the alleyway, one guy stops and points...
      "There he is!"

      Real replies, "You looking for those evil proprietary spyware guys? They went thattaway! No-one here but us open-source lovers".

      Mmm... okay, maybe it wasn't that funny, but it proved a point.
      Okay, so it didn't. Sue me.

      (*) Lame open-source metaphor
      (**) Probably not a metaphor for anything that matters.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  10. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    haha suckers I got **BUFFERING**

  11. features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    RealPlayer 10 supports RealAudio, RealVideo 10, MP3, Ogg Vorbis and Theora, H263 and AAC

  12. Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be very concered about hidden spyware/trojans in these programs based on Real's past releases. Is the RealPlayer/Helix relationship similar to Mozilla/Netscape?

    1. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what is the difference between realplayer and helix player?

    2. Re:Spyware by LordK2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be very concered about hidden spyware/trojans in these programs based on Real's past releases

      And just how long do you think that they would get away with that in an open-source project?


      K

    3. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a long time. Though they wouldn't be able to start for a while, as the source is probably going to be under actual scrutiny because of the company's reputation.

    4. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his concern is more about the Real-branded player than about the open-source core...

    5. Re:Spyware by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And just how long do you think that they would get away with that in an open-source project?

      Indefinitely if they're clever about it...

    6. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is the RealPlayer/Helix relationship similar to Mozilla/Netscape?

      No, it's the opposite.

    7. Re:Spyware by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Now I can't find the help page (it's on their site somewhere) but the gist of it was: RealPlayer can do a lot more than Helix, but you can both modify and freely distribute Helix i.e. as part of a package.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    8. Re:Spyware by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Indefinitely if they're clever about it...

      So, if real managed to insert a trojan into the master copy of the gcc distribution, they could make it work, is that it?

      a bit far fetched...

    9. Re:Spyware by pangloss · · Score: 1

      So, if real managed to insert a trojan into the master copy of the gcc distribution, they could make it work, is that it?

      sometimes an anvil to the head just isn't direct enough. so, no, that's not it.

    10. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I've always speculated something like this could happen. Maybe gcc's compiling backdoors into your linux kernel? You'd never know because it's not in the source anywhere. Has anyone ever tried to compile gcc with anything other than gcc?

      Or would you even trust _that_ copy?

    11. Re:Spyware by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Fel free to explain yourself, if you have any clue what you're talking about - other than compromising the gcc distribution, how would one implement such an automatically propagating, hidden feature and make it fly?

      Or did you not even bother to RTFL?

    12. Re:Spyware by pangloss · · Score: 1

      other than compromising the gcc distribution, how would one implement such an automatically propagating, hidden feature and make it fly?

      Let me restate that:
      i. "implement such an automatically propagating, hidden feature and make it fly" if and only if "compromising the gcc distribution".

      or, "A iff B".

      So to answer your immediate question, which also raises the question whether you yourself "RTFL", I'll quote Ken Thompson: A if "... an assembler, a loader, or even hardware microcode".

      Since I've just provided you a C, D, and E (i.e.: C = assembler, D = loader, E = hardware microcode), your claim, A iff B, is false.

      I'm not really trying to antagonize you, btw ;)
      It's just that the original poster expressed a concern about trojans and spyware in RealPlayer, despite the source release of the Helix Player, questioning if the relation between Helix and RealPlayer was akin to Mozilla and Netscape--i.e. a reasonable concern. Somewhat sidestepping that issue, the issue became one of detecting trojans or spyware in open source software in general. You then restricted the domain to a specific case detailed by Thompson. Do you think that avoiding detection is even limited to exploits such as those described by Thompson? Then you're just not using your imagination enough. The grandparent poster made a fairly intuitive claim along the lines of X if Y is more clever than Z and cited Thompson as an illustrative example. I think you could also have X if Y is less lazy than Z. Or X if Y has more time than Z.

  13. Oggabonafidemediaplayer by grunt107 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's about time RP10 came out. Although I did not see a screen shot, the purported UI integration should help it seem more polished. Support for Ogg & AAC are definitely welcome.

    Will reserve overall judgement to after the installation and operation of this, however.

  14. One question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hate to say it, but why on Earth would anyone willingly use RealPlayer? Maybe the Linux version will be different, but I hate the Windows version. Bloated, slow, and full of ads. And where are those near-CD streams? I can find tons of them in MP3 format, but I can't recall the last time I heard a high-res Real stream.

  15. If slashdot used real format... by students · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    instead of HTML, the pages might load faster. Anything to get it fixed. Previewing this comment took 13 seconds.

    1. Re:If slashdot used real format... by Swedentom · · Score: 1

      Only difference would be that "Loading" would be replaced with "Buffering".

      --
      Sig Nature
  16. Re:helix vs real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    helix does not support the real player only formats. there is therefore no reason to use helix over the dozens of other players out there unless you particularly like the inter...buffering...face.

  17. Moral... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't beat Microsoft or Apple... go open source?

  18. Re:One question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ditto

  19. We're so conflicted by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do we hate Real today or do we love them?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:We're so conflicted by moranar · · Score: 1

      If we are schizophrenic, we can do both at once.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    2. Re:We're so conflicted by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Funny
      No we can't.

      Yes we can.

    3. Re:We're so conflicted by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      A sucky Open-Source product is still sucky.

      Don't let your philosophy blind you to the fundamentals of software quality.

    4. Re:We're so conflicted by jc42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, after a week without access to ComedyCentral.com after I made the mistake of trying RealPlayer10 on my PowerBook, I certainly wouldn't use the word "love".

      OTOH, I did just manage to re-install the RealOne Player that came with the machine, after a lot of stumbling around through pages that told me it was no longer supported. Now I can finally see their coverage of the Democratic Convention without waiting til 11 pm and hoping they rebroadcast it on TV.

      Yes, google found lots of discussions of the problem. Even some suggestions for fixes. None of them worked. Eventually I stumbled across explanations of why this and a long list of other sites don't work. Maybe the next release will fix the problem.

      But next time, I'll do a thorough google search before attempting to install anything of theirs. They seem to believe in letting their users do most of the testing. (And you might note that the download file has the string "beta" in its name.)

      I might mention, though, that RealPlayer 10 comes with its own browser, and it's actually a fairly nice addition to my growing list of browsers. But even their own browser didn't show Comedy Central, or a number of other less important sites. Those it did show, worked much better than their older players.

      (I've started seeing quite a lot of claims that the best coverage of the American election is at ComedyCentral.com, and I think I agree. If you really want to know what's going on, check them out. Unfortunately, they only post videos in Real format.)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:We're so conflicted by killjoe · · Score: 1

      You really need my advice to make up your mind?

      --
      evil is as evil does
  20. Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's slashdot code to hate Real, but they've finally done something good. They continue to support Linux, and gave us the core of their player (which, IMO no longer sucks ass) and we're still criticizing them? Has anyone here even used Realplayer 10 Linux or Helix?

    For christ's sake, you're all like one of those Windows users who will never touch Linux again because "it's all command line" or a Mac since "longhorn will have a 3D UI". Give the company another fucking shot, it's not every day we get a decent media player that supports Theora, Vorbis or their own codecs.

    1. Re:Going against code. by DMadCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny, I've noticed that too.

      Nearly everyone in the Linux community agrees that the way to get Linux on the desktop is to entice the big-name software developers to write more programs for Linux.

      Then, when one of the most well-known (even if not well liked) companies jumps up and does it, everyone cries and whines about it. Frankly Realplayer didn't do anything a dozen or more other software companies did/still do. They just got caught.

      As for Realplayer, my advice would be to download it even if you don't install it. When a company like that supports Linux it's a good idea to at least look like we're supporting them back as a flag to any other companies that may be watching from the fence.

    2. Re:Going against code. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Yeah, yeah, I know it's slashdot code to hate Real, but they've finally done something good. They continue to support Linux, and gave us the core of their player (which, IMO no longer sucks ass) and we're still criticizing them? Has anyone here even used Realplayer 10 Linux or Helix?


      Heaven forbid one would hold Real accountable for it's past behavior. Real didn't become a Slashdot pariah by giving us the core of their player. They got their reputation from introducing spyware, playing hide-the-link, and assorted other annoying behavior. If you feel that these criticisms are invalid, please jump in and point out the errors.

      Having said that - I do think that some of the criticism I've seen under this thread is invalid. I'm glad Real is trying to do some Good Things. And I'm willing to see what they're doing these days.

      Just don't expect this behavior to instantly wipe out years of previous history.
    3. Re:Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just don't expect this behavior to instantly wipe out years of previous history.

      History of what, killing children? Just because a couple of years ago they made a shitty product does NOT mean we should avoid them now. It was horrible, so what?

      A bad product can be forgiven, and I don't see why all of a sudden "It's different" with Real. Netscape had a horrible product, they come out with Mozilla, we embrace it. But as for Real and Helix, avoidance is continued like they have the plague or something?

    4. Re:Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then, when one of the most well-known (even if not well liked) companies jumps up and does it, everyone cries and whines about it.

      Who's crying and whining? There's almost nothing but positive comments in this thread.

    5. Re:Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you said it well:
      Nearly everyone in the Linux community agrees that the way to get Linux on the desktop is to entice the big-name software developers to write more programs for Linux.

      Then, when one of the most well-known (even if not well liked) companies jumps up and does it, everyone [ON Slashdot] cries and whines about it

      Do you realize Slashdot is mostly Windows Users, and only a very small minority want Linux on their desktop ? Comments are not owned by the OSDN ;)

    6. Re:Going against code. by DMadCat · · Score: 1

      Who's crying and whining? There's almost nothing but positive comments in this thread.

      You forgot the delimiters.

    7. Re:Going against code. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      playing hide-the-link

      As someone who had to dig through the site numerous times to install "hidden" versions, I can understand being annoyed at Real, but I can't understand holding it against them. I mean, their business model has always included selling a "premium" player. It seems to me that the fact that they were giving away a gratis version should mitigate the fact that it wasn't prominently linked on the front page of their site.

      Should we be angry at department stores for not putting their brand-name clearance racks immediately inside the front door, or is it understandable that they make you walk past the regular-price goods in order to get to them?

      There are plenty of legitimate reasons to dislike the old Real. Making you dig through their site for a free version of their flagship product isn't one of them.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    8. Re:Going against code. by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Frankly Realplayer didn't do anything a dozen or more other software companies did/still do. They just got caught.


      No, they just made it blatent and overly irritating

      Using anything after RealPlayer 3 (or arguably G2, which wasn't so bad as it was just bloated) is a matter of trying to find a way to make the ads go away, start the player up without fifteen offers to sign up for whatever appearing, and actually figuring out how the HELL to load a media file.

      Apple tried this sh!t with a version of quicktime not to long ago (I actually couldn't figure out how to get it to STOP playing ads!), thankfully they seemed to have given up on that tactic very fast.

      Then again, I haven't started QuickTime by itself in a long time.

      Ok, when starting up I still see an ad, but it is static (for now. . . .), and nothing is actually popping up at me.

      No idea why I can only "open a file in a NEW window", what the hell would I want ANOTHER Window open for by default. Granted once in a blue moon that comes in handy, but most of the time, I want to open a video in the SAME windows. . . .

      *sigh* Apples vaunted UIs must not extend to the Window's platform.

      WinAmp 5 kicks ass, takes too long to load still, (2.0ghz Machine, 512 megs of ram, why the HELL is it taking time to load at ALL? ), man I wish Media Player 6.2 had just BASIC playlist capabilities, then it'd be perfect. Actually it already IS the perfect movie player, being able to use my left and right arrow keys to fast forward and rewind would make it better though. :-D (it is the only "mass market" media player that lets me configure my codecs, damnit, I hate not having the options there, and the Nullsoft dudes damn well know better!)
    9. Re:Going against code. by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      This is their second chance. They are doing well so far. Let's see if they keep it up. If they do, good for them, less and less people will hate them.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    10. Re:Going against code. by anethema · · Score: 1

      Have you never tryed media player classic? You can do all the shit you're talking about, including fast forward/rewinding, configuring codecs..and the upside? Download real and quicktime alternative and it will play your real/quicktime files too.

      Winamp5 just isnt that good a player for video. It doesnt do well on files that have more than one audio track, doesnt seem to play dvds all that well, and like you said, slow to load. Media player classic has no playlist, but is a MUCH better media player.

      Its available here if you care to try it out.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    11. Re:Going against code. by Homology · · Score: 1
      Heaven forbid one would hold Real accountable for it's past behavior. Real didn't become a Slashdot pariah by giving us the core of their player.

      The most important part, the codecs, are still binary. I could care less for the player, if the codecs was freely available.

    12. Re:Going against code. by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Yah, right after I posted the above message I went and got it, I had heard of it before.

      Old habits die hard, so I am going to create a symbolic link to it, name the link mplayer2, and figure out which directory to shove it in. :)

      Now hell the hell is WMplayer.exe running when D:\program files\Windows Media Player\ isn't even in my path statement. . . . ^_^

      Heya, did you know, WMP6.x actually has playlist support, just no UI for it?

    13. Re:Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your analogy, they didn't have to put it right inside the door, but they also shouldn't have hid it in a crawlspace with an entrace only a foot wide.

    14. Re:Going against code. by default+luser · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "hidden link" comment has a double-meaning.

      In the days of yore, not only did you have to tromp through phantom links to find the free version of the player.

      Once you actually downloaded the software and went to install it, you would be presented with a page full of "opt-in" crap. I say "opt-in" because Real cleverly had all the options you could see on the screen deselected by default.

      The evil part: they made it hard to see that the screen could actually scroll, and there was additional crap hidden below that was CHECKED BY DEFAULT.

      Now, you can say what you want about trying to sell people the super-platinum-mega player, but hiding "opt-out" options below options that are clearly "opt-in"...that's sneaky and unforgivable.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    15. Re:Going against code. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Nearly everyone in the Linux community agrees that the way to get Linux on the desktop is to entice the big-name software developers to write more programs for Linux.

      That's not true at all. I doubt many people who know anything, believe that at all.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. first step? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about all the steps before this one? surely one of them makes a better "first" step.

    i motion that we call this a great 18309th step.

    (the number is made up, but it seems to be in the ball park)

    1. Re:first step? by base_chakra · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Our goal is to make the Linux desktop a first class citizen and we think today's releases are a good first step in that direction."

      While few would contest that RealNetworks' GPL'd contribution is a boon, it's too bad that their announcement was so self-congratulatory that it tacitly insulted the Linux community, and belittled the work of everyone who has ever positively contributed to it; especially since those collective efforts dwarf RealNetworks' late contribution.

  22. RealPlayer/Helix Relationship by Roguelazer · · Score: 5, Informative
    "The Helix Player is the Helix Community's open source media player for consumers. It is being developed to have a rich and usable graphical interface and support a variety of open media formats like Ogg Vorbis, Theora etc. The RealPlayer for Linux is built on top of the Helix Player for Linux and includes support for several non-open source components including RealAudio/RealVideo, MP3 etc."
    From the helix site itself. :D
  23. This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded the player, its actually quite nice, no ads, aparently no spyware... Maybe this is a good thing.

  24. RealPlayer Enterprise for Windows... by joseph+schmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently downloaded Free Real Player Enterprise (argh, what a mouthful), which doesn't _seem_ to have any spyware at all:

    http://www.realnetworks.com/products/rpe/index.htm l

    btw, i put bogus personal info into the form and it did not require me to reply to an email in order to download the product.

    1. Re:RealPlayer Enterprise for Windows... by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads-up on this. However, I have some unfavourable comments. When I installed RPE it claimed it would give control over file associations, however this isn't true. It stole the associations for Realmedia files from Media Player Classic (RealAlternative) and flatly refuses to let them be unticked !

      So, it gives more choice, but is still a typically Real product in that it seems to think it knows better than I do what I want.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  25. RealPlayer 10 Does Play RealOne Files! by dduardo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just downloaded realplayer 10, but I get this message when trying to play a realone file:

    "The content you are trying to play uses an audio codec that is obsolete and no longer supported. Please contact the content provider about using a supported codec."

    What's up with this? I got the file from Cdnow.com.
    ---------

    1. Re:RealPlayer 10 Does Play RealOne Files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to work fine for me on Windows.

      What URL are you trying to play?

    2. Re:RealPlayer 10 Does Play RealOne Files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "you can now enjoy all those embedded media clips, as well as the latest RealAudio 10, RealVideo 10"

      It wont support Real 9 or below ...

    3. Re:RealPlayer 10 Does Play RealOne Files! by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      Considering that RealPlayer 10 for windows has a "realaudio 2.0" codec for download, I'm willing to bet that RP for linux doesn't have that codec installed.

      Keep in mind that the last RealAudio release was version 8, so RA2 is pretty old (and shitty in terms of quality nowadays) :)

    4. Re:RealPlayer 10 Does Play RealOne Files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT does support all Real codecs from G2 up, and including Realvideo 8, Realvideo 9, and Realvideo 10.

      The only one not supported (it's in the README file, perhaps you should RTFM), is the ancient RealAudio 2.0 codec.

  26. Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...then you may have a point.

    How is Linux suppose to be ready for the desktop if developers/users continue with 'patents be damned' attitude?

    Xine and MPlayer aren't legal in many major markets. That rules them out for many of us.

    Helix is legal and backed by RealNetworks legal department.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      that's not an excuse. just buy (e.g.) a SuSE Linux box and install that on all your computers. being a legal product it has all the questionable components removed.

      applying your logic, how can Windows be ready for the desktop when a huge fraction of users have illegal copies of Windows, Office and other software?

    2. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The patent system seems to work ok for mechanical inventions, but is terribly broken for software.
      I would bet it's probably impossible to write *any* software which does not violate patents that have been given out and for every valid patent there's probably 1000 invalid ones.
      These being the conditions, it's much better to ignore the broken system, that way *if* you ever get sued and *if* you loose, you won't have to pay tripple damages.
      Not to mention that most of the world does not care about software patents. Only one country cares with 1/12th of the population on the planet. Worse, probably only 0.1% of that country would actually benefit or want software patents.
      So, only about 1/12000 of the worlds population cares about software patents. They just happen to also be among the richest and most powerful and manage to buy ridiculous laws and "free trade agreements".

      --

      Liberty.

    3. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read somewhere recently that as many as 2 out of every 3 patents are invalidated when they're contested. I'd bet that the ratio is higher for software patents, but probably not 1000:1. Business method patents are equally absurd, perhaps even more so than software patents.

    4. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by msh104 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, according to the dutch site tweakers, (www.tweakers.net) the linux kernel itself is possibily violating 286 patents, including 27 owned by Microsoft and 98 from 'Linux friendly' companies like the 60 from IBM, 20 from HP and 11 from Intel, and NO, it wasn't SCO that searched this stuff out. patents are one big mess, it's very nearly impossible to create compatible (as in, windows send file, linux users uses it, edits, send back, windows users uses it) open source products without violating patents. patents prevent software creators to compete with each other, therefore, patents must die!

    5. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by rokzy · · Score: 1

      >and NO, it wasn't SCO that searched this stuff out

      I know it wasn't SCO, it was Open Source Risk Management, a company that sells linux patent insurance.

    6. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1
      The patent system seems to work ok for mechanical inventions, but is terribly broken for software.

      That's why we argue about why they shouldn't be allowed. The best arguement I saw was someone from Gloklaw. Paraphrased: Software is math. If you allow someone to patent 2+2=4, how long before no one can write any statement about 4 without violating a patent?

  27. So how well does it work? by magefile · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to install it quite yet ... so can someone tell me how well it works? When I tried RP9 for Linux (and the Helix beta), it was slow, crash-prone, buggy, and video generally didn't display right.

    If it is as good as claimed, I'll be thrilled - there are several organizations I belong to that (for various reasons) only use RealMedia. I'm skeptical for now, but a stable RealPlayer for Linux would be wonderful (no, xine/mplayer are not perfect!).

    1. Re:So how well does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, i can not understand why people here are "talking trash" about RealPlayer 10 and Helix, sure..Real has a bad history but they're finally doing something right. This player is great, I've been using RealPlayer 10 and the release before that for some time, it contains no ads, and i have seen no evidence of it being a spyware. And it supports the Real codec, whatever they call it. Sure, I could get it to work with mplayer/Xine (and I have..) but I don't need to anymore, and now they're destributing the RPMs for Red Hat/Fedora, which is even better for a Fedora user like my, it intergrates into the Gnome desktop and Nautulus like it were a Gnome app. Anyway, try it out.

    2. Re:So how well does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's nice from a doesn't-crash-and-plays-files-well perspective, but the usability isn't so hot. I'm glad it integrates with your Gnome desktop, but it looks sorely out-of-place on any non-Gnome desktop, and you're always clicking the wrong buttons because they're all switched around. I'll keep using Kaffeine/Xine until they fix it.

  28. Yet Another "First Step"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our goal is to make the Linux desktop a first class citizen and we think today's releases are a good first step in that direction."

    What makes them think that their crummy software is the first step in Linux's move to the desktop? I mean, do I have to spell it all out? Gnome, KDE, OpenOffice.org, Neverwinter Nights, Doom 3, etc, etc, etc...

  29. Helix Player support for propietary codecs? by Epidemical · · Score: 1

    Can Helix Player play Quicktime, etc.? Xine and mplayer can use binary codecs to play Quicktime and such, but can Helix Player do this, being backed by a competitor?

    1. Re:Helix Player support for propietary codecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the FAQ:
      Not Supported: Older QuickTime codecs (eg, Sorenson. New QuickTime supported via MPEG4)
      https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/help/p layerfaq.html#mozTocId859204

      Do note though that while player is MPEG4 capable, and an MPEG4 implementation is also available - it is not bundled with the player by default. It is likely that distros that qualify and ship the RealPlayer will include MPEG4.
      https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/help/p layerfaq.html#mozTocId117659
      --
      Vikram Dendi
      Program Manager & Project Lead
      Helix/Real Players

  30. not offtopic, someone should fix this already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get a Service Unavailable in 29 out of 30 tries for the front page when I'm logged in!

  31. Theora support by SteamyMobile · · Score: 1

    It's great that this is out, and has Theora support. Now if only I could figure out how to get Mplayer to actually encode things into Theora I could use it.

  32. Re:One question: Why? by WWWWolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I recently tried RealPlayer 10's beta for Linux. It's actually pretty slick (well, it was beta, so it was a bit unstable at times, but hey...) and plays Icecast streams in Ogg Vorbis pretty damn well (and you can get just plain Helix Player for that too, without RealVideo support). It was small, not too slow (Linux versions of RP are never ever slow!) and there's no trace of ads!

    Yeah, Windows players are probably hell, but the *NIX players have the history of ruling, at least to small extent =)

    But to be perfectly honest, the real reason I switched from RP8 to RP10beta was the support for XVideo extension and actual support for fullscreen playing. Makes watching some videos far less annoying when you don't need to maximize the window and fullscreen mode doesn't eat all processor. And, yuck, RP8 was a Motif app and RP10 uses GTK+2.

  33. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by screwedcork · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    No I've been getting them a lot... it usually works if I refresh a couple times though maybe slashdot has been slashdotted!

  34. Getting the plugins to work? by Isldeur · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Anybody else get the plugins for mozilla to work? I copied them from the /opt/RealPlayer10/mozilla dir I installed into and I get a:

    audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin RealPlayer Plugin Metafile rpm Yes

    in the about:plugins, but nothing from news.bbc.co.uk loads.

    1. Re:Getting the plugins to work? by groomed · · Score: 1

      Works for me, Firefox 0.9 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040615 Firefox/0.9).

    2. Re:Getting the plugins to work? by falkryn · · Score: 5, Informative

      I did a ln -s /rp_source_dir/plugins/* /usr/lib/mozilla-1.7/plugins

      sort of like a java plugin install. works great for me.

    3. Re:Getting the plugins to work? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... but nothing from news.bbc.co.uk loads.

      Make sure that you allow the BBC site to display popups. When you click on their link, javascript will try to open a popup. Mozilla blocked the popup for me until I allowed it. Plays fine! -jh

    4. Re:Getting the plugins to work? by dd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found that you also needed to do
      (fedora core 2 - system plugin dir is /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ ):
      ln -s /path/to/rp_source_dir/mozilla/nphelix.so /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/.

    5. Re:Getting the plugins to work? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I'm not having any luck either. Mozilla's plugin page gives "audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin RealPlayer Plugin Metafile rpm Yes", but I'm still getting the 'need a plugin' alert when trying to play the videos at comedycentral.com.

      I tried linking from the RealPlayer/mozilla and RealPlayer/plugins to the plugins folder in both .mozilla and /usr/lib/mozilla.

      This is on Debian Unstable, using the realplayer rpm installed via alien.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  35. First Impression by Pecisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, it doesn't require any kind of email registration. Second, it based on GTK - that's great, no more outdated Modif GUI. Let's see how it will be handled. I would like to point out that if we would have two descent Media frameworks - Helix and GStreamer (which still has to mature), then it would be very good. It's nice to see that Real learns something from their past.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:First Impression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's just half-way great. I'm currently working for a kind of larger company which works on a Qt-based commercial application. We would have liked to integrate the Helix/Realplayer but partly due to the fact that it seems to be rather tied to Gtk we went for a different popular media player which fully meets our requirements as well (it's currently being ported from windows and will be announced soon). Anyways I recently heard rumors that due to popular demand Real might offer a Qt frontend soon so this "issue" might go away.

    2. Re:First Impression by IvyKing · · Score: 1
      Second, it based on GTK - that's great, no more outdated Modif GUI.

      In my experience, GTK still has a way to go to catch with Motif in respect to working smoothly.

    3. Re:First Impression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True! Like a previous poster I think they would have done better if they went with Qt (like most commercial software vendors seem to do these days).

  36. Yes ! by Mr+Europe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now there's no reason not to get it in Debian!
    Someone please put up a Debian-package !

    1. Re:Yes ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use 'alien' to roll your own.

  37. Real Player 10 vs Helix Player Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any difference between these two? The docs seems a little scetchy on the feature details.

  38. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by gowen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Hey, bad programmers (and anyone who's seen slashcode knows who I'm talking about) can write bad code using any paradigm.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  39. And This is Why Linux Fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is why Linux fails as an operating system.


    Installation Instructions

    - Ensure that the .bin file you downloaded is executable. You can make the .bin file executable by running the "chmod a+x RealPlayer10GOLD.bin" command from a terminal window.

    - Run the .bin file by typing "./RealPlayer10GOLD.bin". Follow the prompts provided to finish installing the player.


    Rrriiiggghhhttt. Look Ma, we're back in 1993!

    1. Re:And This is Why Linux Fails by capt.mellow · · Score: 1

      . . . and you find this installation daunting? Then by all means, please continue using windows.

    2. Re:And This is Why Linux Fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows users, please click YES on the activex popup to view this xxx site."

      Hey Ma, how did we clock up $1000 on our phone bill last month?

  40. Finally ! by bushboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Some quality Spyware for Linux !

    Sheesh, it's been a long journey for that little penguin, but lets all say it "Linux has come of age" ! ;)

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  41. Re:RealPlayer 10 Doesn't Play RealOne Files! by dduardo · · Score: 1

    I knew I should have used the preview button

  42. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that I only get the 503 errors if I'm logged in. If I disable cookies it starts working again.

  43. Nice Interface by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Looks clean but reminds me just a BIT of totem.

  44. They sure have! by evil-osm · · Score: 1

    Our goal is to make the Linux desktop a first class citizen and we think today's releases are a good first step in that direction.

    I can attest to this, as they royaly fucked my Windows system the last time I installed Real player on it.

    --


    E.

    Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
    1. Re:They sure have! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO

  45. Poisened Waters by augustz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sad thing with Real is that they've done such a good job of poisening the waters with previous releases.

    When they thought they could play with the big boys (apple, microsoft) they would spam the living daylights out of people, they would load up their player with so much junk it blew your mind, they tookever system settings, popped up message center windows with marketing "alerts".

    For a lot of early adopter folks in the open source space it's hard to forget the horrors of real's "customer friendly" policies.

    Now they are realizing that they are unlikely to beat Microsoft at it's own game. So they have deceided to try and play with the nice kids. I wonder if management has changed. This feels to me less like a top down thing then someone in the company evangalizing a new approach.

    If they had played clean from the start, with their branding etc they would have rocked as a linux player.

    I think Novell actually is going to show how a clean playing company can leverage the open source world. They've really done the right thing so far through it all (SCO etc).

    1. Re:Poisened Waters by jonabbey · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want to talk about 'early adopter' folks, I remember the very first RealAudio beta.. it ran on Solaris/SunOS, back before there was much of a Windows TCP/IP customer base (back in 1995, yo!).

      And no, there wasn't anything in the way of commercial spam or hide the link or whatever.. it was just a binary streaming audio player, and it actually worked.

      So I'll forgive Real for their recent transgressions and thank them for supporting Linux.. especially considering their Linux client never did any of the adware/spyware/hide-the-link crap that the Windows client did.

      You use Windows, you take your chances, right?

    2. Re:Poisened Waters by mmurphy000 · · Score: 1
      I wonder if management has changed. This feels to me less like a top down thing then someone in the company evangalizing a new approach.

      I was "on the ground" in Seattle providing some assistance with the original Helix launch. It was a bit of both top-down and evangelism. Rob Glaser (RealNetworks' CEO) is apparently a friend of Tim O'Reilly, so I'm sure Mr. Glaser was getting a steady stream of "open source is da bomb" influences. There was also a key RealNetworks engineer who managed to both provide the spark for Mr. Glaser's decision and also help push the decision through the rest of the organization.

    3. Re:Poisened Waters by evilviper · · Score: 1
      they would load up their player with so much junk it blew your mind, they tookever system settings, popped up message center windows with marketing "alerts".

      For a lot of early adopter folks in the open source space it's hard to forget the horrors of real's "customer friendly" policies.

      All the stuff you describe never came with the Unix players, only Windows. So, if anything, the "early adopts folks in the open source space" found a version of Real Player that was much better than it's Windows counter-part. It's only been fairly recently that you had to manually grab an extra codec pack and install it yourself. That isn't so great, but it's not that bad, and it wasn't that way until a year or so ago, when Real was already going down, and open source users weren't just "early adopters" anymore.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  46. Premium content by Scorchio · · Score: 1

    "Willingly" hmmm...

    I have a subscription to access premium content provided through Real. As this requires me to use RealPlayer for Windows, I guess I don't use it willingly as such. While the older Linux versions may have played the video fine, it didn't appear to support the login process for premium content. This has brought the transition from Windows to Linux in my household to a grinding halt.

    So, has anyone had any luck accessing premium streams with this new version?

  47. Re:helix vs real by redtux1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just downloaded it - looks pretty nice, BBC streams actually work now

  48. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If it's bandwith I'm sure they could solve it by adopting CSS...

    http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slashdot/

    Why AC... cos the last time I logged in it 503'd me!

  49. It doesn't work with Amazon's music clips by jonfelder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting, when I try to listen to an audio clip on Amazon.com with Real Player 10, I get an error about the codec being too old and no longer supported.

    1. Re:It doesn't work with Amazon's music clips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats because they use real audio 2.0, a very old codec. It's not supported anymore

  50. Showstopper question by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    While I've always had a love/hate relationship with RealPlayer (love the streaming format, hate the business practices), there's always been one thing that's made them useless on the Linux/Unix platform. It didn't support fullscreen play!

    Does this new version support fullscreen playback? That's really the only feature I care about.

    1. Re:Showstopper question by groomed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it supports fullscreen playback. It isn't as fast and clever as, say, mplayer, but it's there and it works.

    2. Re:Showstopper question by msh104 · · Score: 1

      jup, it does!

    3. Re:Showstopper question by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      yes.

      the install is painless, give er a shot.

    4. Re:Showstopper question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mplayer? when switching mplayer to fullscreen mode there's a bit of a delay, more than with vlc player on my ibook G4. vlc player tends to play anime avis more smoothly while mplayer plays mpegs better.

  51. Re:One question: Why? by cageyjames · · Score: 0

    Well sure, between WordPerfect and RealPlayer, what more do you need on Linux?

  52. one thing they over stepped their bounds on.. by Hohlraum · · Score: 0

    they replace all the default icon's for whatever codecs they support. Now that sucks ass.

  53. Obligatory response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We hates them, precious! We hates them forever!

    1. Re:Obligatory response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Real hates YOU!

  54. Stuttering by marvin2k · · Score: 1

    The files I play are stuttering even when they're local files and sometimes I have to hit my mouse button several time just to get a response from the app. Does anybody else see this and knows a workaround?

    1. Re:Stuttering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed this too

    2. Re:Stuttering by smchris · · Score: 1


      Somthing like it. I'm getting occasional drop outs under heavy system load with 16k airamericaradio where I never noticed a problem with XMMS 56k music streams under similar conditions.

      But it is a good thing in general to have a RealPlayer with plugin.

    3. Re:Stuttering by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      Test Post I loaded real yesterday, but when will debian set up an installer for the new version (the realplayer package installs ver8)...

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  55. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by augustz · · Score: 1

    I'll get them for hours at a time at work. Lot's of fun. One of those "upgrades" that downgrades.

  56. Real's Linux gambit by mst76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft, Apple and Real are the major commercial players in the media player and streaming video market. Microsoft for obvious and Apple for less obvious reasons won't support Linux, so it's a good opportunity for Real to become the dominant player here. At the moment, Linux desktop use doesn't amount to very much. The hope for Real is that it will accellerate in the coming years, especially since they seem to be losing the Windows desktop. Maybe they will become the Mozilla of media players?

  57. Poisened = Poisoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, excuse the bad spelling. Here's to previewing comments before submitting.

    - augustz

  58. Wrong ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 5, Informative
    xine/mplayer are hardly illegal. They are indeed covered by mpeg4 patents (which only apply if you sell a certain number of units), and furthermore it is illegal (DMCA ...) to distribute them with libdvdread.

    That's all.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Wrong ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about the warez Windows codec DLLs, and Sorenson patents, and...

    2. Re:Wrong ... by Homology · · Score: 2, Insightful
      , and furthermore it is illegal (DMCA ...) to distribute them with libdvdread.

      Erh, US law does not apply outside USA. But with Bush Jr. in power, I suppose you can be forgiven this misunderstanding.

    3. Re:Wrong ... by jc42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not to worry; when Diebold and other voting-equipment companies re-elect Dubya as promised, you can bet that one of the main items on the agenda will be finally extending the blessings of US law to the rest of the planet.

      (Oooh - Flamebait. I haven't got that rating for weeks. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Wrong ... by Sam+H · · Score: 1

      xine/mplayer are hardly illegal. They are indeed covered by mpeg4 patents (which only apply if you sell a certain number of units), and furthermore it is illegal (DMCA ...) to distribute them with libdvdread.

      Don't confuse libdvdcss and libdvdread. And AFAIK the DVD CCA has dropped all DMCA claims against DeCSS-like devices; they are now using their patent portfolio. However, the libdvdcss authors have never been threatened by DMCA or patent infrigement claims or whatever (by the way, I am the main libdvdcss author). Also note that Linspire is distributing Xine and libdvdcss with the DVD CCA's authorization, which makes them pretty legal to my eyes.

      --
      God, root, what is difference ?
    5. Re:Wrong ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dont thin that the US is the center of the world , do you ? if its illegal in your country i msut not be illegal in another country. By fact it is most legal in most countries of this world. so stop spreading so much nonsense like : it is illegal.

      perhaps you could write : its illegal in the US, the US always wanted to play a special role on the globe, so you have it here. But please keep other countries off this illegal stuff.

      In China and India (which are 2/3) of the population of the world this is perfectly legal.

    6. Re:Wrong ... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      it is illegal (DMCA ...) to distribute them with libdvdread.

      No, libdvdread has no crypto at all. It's libdvdcss or libcssauth (or any other lib with css in it's name) that is illegial to distribute.

      However, on the positive side, applications compiled with libdvdread can read dvds once libdvdcss is installed, all without having to recompile the application. Very nice, well thought-out design, which is all too rare.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  59. Why is this forcing me to use IE by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I use mozilla or mozilla firefox I get the 503's but when I use IE I don't get them. Are you kidding me, Slashdot?

    1. Re:Why is this forcing me to use IE by cslarson · · Score: 1

      I am reporting the same strange behavior. I'm getting consistent 503 errors with FireFox, but have no problems with Internet Explorer. I find this somewhat ironic.

    2. Re:Why is this forcing me to use IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps that's because you're logged into Mozilla/Firefox, but you're not in IE? I'm finding that being logged out makes me not get 503's..

    3. Re:Why is this forcing me to use IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's because the problem is in the login mechanism. If you delete the /. cookies (or use a browser without them), you get rid of the 503 errors.

    4. Re:Why is this forcing me to use IE by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Has something to do with cookies. You probably have expired /. cookies in IE, so it works fine there. Your mozilla and firebird cookies are still good, so it's broke.

      Read about it in fortknox's journal or on the sourceforge page for slashcode.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:Why is this forcing me to use IE by zombie-m · · Score: 1
      That's because the problem is in the login mechanism. If you delete the /. cookies (or use a browser without them), you get rid of the 503 errors.

      No, you don't. At least I don't. I'm using Galeon, and I've cleared my /. cookies several times with no success. It seems the only thing that does fix it is time. Wait a while and try again. Very annoying.

  60. symbian by jford235 · · Score: 2, Informative

    got it on my n-gage qd. works well, other than the real video clips need to be very small quality. but regardless, i have video on my phone.

  61. Re:And This is Why Linux Fails... uh... no... by DMadCat · · Score: 1

    This is why Linux succeeds as an Operating System.

    Granted it would be easier if you could just click on a file and have it execute but then you would wind up with all of the security flaws inherent in Windows.

    Is it really so difficult to learn a few commands and/or type them in verbatim?

  62. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

    So *that*'s what happened to the Iraqi Information Minister!

  63. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
    Don't forget Perl!

    Good ol' friendly with resources Perl... mmmmmm.

    BTW, I had to fight through 4 rounds of 503 to read this story and post this comment... using Firefox on my Linux workstation at work.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  64. Never though I'd say this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > And just how long do you think that they would get away with that in an open-source project?

    In Soviet Russia you spy on Real Player!

  65. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by athakur999 · · Score: 1

    I only get the 503's when trying to get to the front page. For some reason, anything else works fine, including the RSS feed (http://slashdot.org/index.rss). I can read the stories by going through the links from the RSS feed, but I can't get to them from the front page because of the 503s...

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  66. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try logging out.. works for me!

  67. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good jesus, you need to get better at recognizing humor.

  68. OPEN-SOURCE FLASH PLUGIN? by JessLeah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hello? Did I just read what I thought I read!? Full support for Flash, and it's open-source!?!?? This is a first!!! This means that virtually any Un*xlike operating system, running on virtually any CPU, can now play Flash-- right?

    1. Re:OPEN-SOURCE FLASH PLUGIN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, Helix Player doesn't support flash. Real Player does.

    2. Re:OPEN-SOURCE FLASH PLUGIN? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      This means that virtually any Un*xlike operating system, running on virtually any CPU, can now play Flash-- right?

      The GPL'd flash player has been around for quite some time.

      http://www.swift-tools.net/Flash/
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:OPEN-SOURCE FLASH PLUGIN? by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      Yes, it just stinks.

    4. Re:OPEN-SOURCE FLASH PLUGIN? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Yes, it just stinks.

      It's open source. Start coding!

      If I had even the slightest interest in Flash, I would work on it myself. Since I don't, it's up to you to do it, or get someone else to do it.

      "Gimme gimme gimme" doesn't accomplish much.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  69. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try loggin' out.. then I can hit the front page just fine.

  70. What about REAL Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if Real intends to develop a Linux version of it's MovieLinks and Starz Ticket pay services?

  71. Thanks, but no, thanks by er_col · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why would I even consider using Real stuff when there are so many excellent free players?

    Just to give one example, KPlayer at version 0.5.1 is already light years ahead of any Real stuff and plays RealMedia just like any MPEG, AVI, MP3 or Ogg Media. It's MPlayer based, and its KDE interface is absolutely awesome.

    Bye-bye Real!

    1. Re:Thanks, but no, thanks by evilviper · · Score: 1
      and plays RealMedia just like any MPEG, AVI, MP3 or Ogg Media. It's MPlayer based,

      MPlayer is very good, but it's far from supporting all propritary codecs out there. There are a few Real/WMP formats that don't work, and most of them are low-bitrate codecs, which you are likely to see used in streaming.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  72. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by jd142 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The past couple of days I've not only been getting a lot of time outs when connecting to Slashdot, I've also been getting re-directed to microsoft.com when I try to go to Newsforge. Usually happens once or twice the first thing in the morning then never again for the rest of the day.

    Don't know if it's something messed up at the dns servers here or what. I keep hoping Newsforge or Slashdot might actually have an article addressing the problems, but nothing yet.

  73. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by mukund · · Score: 1

    So, it is the bad programmers' fault, eh?

    --
    Banu
  74. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    EVEN NOW THE ERRORS ARE COMMITTING SUICIDE AT THE GATES OF SLASHDOT!!! THE INFIDEL 503 ERRORS WILL ROAST IN THE BELLIES OF THE SLASHDOTTERS!!!

    Vote CmdrTaco for Slashdot Information Minister in '04.

  75. Helix player for Windows by CdBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I understand it, Helix was a community-led project to design a cross-platform media player framework, the Helix Player, which is then used by Realnetworks to make their RealPlayer application with the addition of closed-source codecs and probably a degree of Real's nagware added in

    So: Where.. or when, can I download Helix Player for Windows? I don't want or need Real's codecs on my system, but if the player is as good as people say I may consider using it instead of Windows Media Player for watching my downloaded movie files

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  76. FLAC support? by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

    Does it offer FLAC support?

  77. Re:One question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Linux I decided to install RealOne since I couldn't seem to get other players to open 'real' media. I was actually surprised that it worked quite well, and while I've never been the fan of the cute interface stuff, it's a lot better than most of the skinnable junk in Linux. I have yet to find a decent front end to mplayer that I like. Kaffiene is a good front end to Xine, but Xine randomly barfs on some mpegs (before the last update it would only play mpegs and give white noise for all sounds).

    RealPlayer is probably the ONLY player I've found on linux that just works. I'm looking forward to the GTK interface, and hopefully they added some features like always start up doubled in size. RealPlayer actually does what it is supposed to, so I don't think I could ask for more than that - and with no adds. I'll admit I'd still be weary to try it on windows, but I'm quite happy with the Linux incarnation.

  78. OK let's videochat between iChat and Helix Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok Helix Player has a H.263 codec that is the same codec that iChat uses. iChat has an open protocol so that means that some smart people could create an open source videochat application right? And it would work with Apple iChat!

    See you around,
    Dennis

  79. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    CSS? Then we'd have to use DeCSS to read it on Linux! Oh, THAT CSS :)

  80. Gentoo ebuild? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is already a bug filled at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59281

    What should I do, wait for the ebuild or install it.. To install or not to install that is the question.

  81. No Ads Now makes is alright? by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

    > ..and does not assault me with ads or offers to upgrade anywhere near the extent that the older ones did

    And what, I'm supposed to believe that they won't put them back in when its convenient to them? I don't think so.

    Real's product/company image with technical users is trashed, and there's a *damn* good reason for that.

    I can only speak for myself, but I will *never* use another Real product or support any website/organization that uses their products.

    1. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I can only speak for myself, but I will *never* use another Real product or support any website/organization that uses their products.
      That's your loss. That's the tragic thing about it.
    2. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish you had actually speficied what the damn good reason is -- I'd like to know -- instead of just putting the word "damn" between two asterisks for added emphasis. Really, capital letters should have been used for that instead.

    3. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by catbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And what, I'm supposed to believe that they won't put them back in when its convenient to them? I don't think so.

      Why don't you wait till they do, and stop using it then?

      As it is, you are providing them no incentive to correct their past mistakes.

    4. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why don't you wait till they do, and stop using it then?

      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...

      I, too, will never use any Real Networks product, unless I have a *damn* good reason.

      --fred

    5. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use it at all? To get used to garbageware in the expectation that it will become useless is just stupid. Hey, why not buy a Hyundai and change when you find that it can't safely overtake due to lack of power? Why not buy a Mac LC III and upgrade when you find it too slow? How about a Tseng Labs card for Doom 3?

      Real products are shit. Real has had as many chances as Real deserve. That they are now attempting to drive a wedge into free OSs with a "sort of" free player is sickening. Die, Real, die.

    6. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      I don't use it because I use Real Alternative (http://home.hccnet.nl/h.edskes/finalbuilds.htm) which lets me play real-media files (if I absolutely have to, (at work for example) ) in Windows Media Player.

    7. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      1) It used to install spyware. Sure, they say they don't now, but why take the risk.

      2) The last I checked, you couldn't install it without giving them an email address. This just irritates the heck out of me. (This is also the reason I give support@real.com to any other program/website that requires an email).

      3) The icon that shows in the System Tray (like Winamp's 'Agent', but I think they call it something different), can't be disabled without making at least five mouse-clicks. This is also drives me nuts as it should only require at most two.

    8. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did they ever install spyware? Can you give me the name of the actual spyware program? From my understanding of things, it was found they were sending a GUID up when you streamed a file.. Do you know what a GUID is?

  82. Package Management or Media File by Jahf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does no one else get routinely tired of .rpm files being seen as "audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin" when trying to download a new RPM package from a web site?

    I wish that by now there would have been a resolution between the two file types. Other than switching off an RPM distribution :)

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    1. Re:Package Management or Media File by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Does no one else get routinely tired of .rpm files being seen as "audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin" when trying to download a new RPM package from a web site?

      yeah, pet peeve... grr.. but that's a glitch for the browser folks to fix...

    2. Re:Package Management or Media File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr, no it is a glitch for the server to fix, it is the server that sends the mime type.

  83. Re:Thanks, but no, thanks (Kaffeine) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you try Kaffeine?

    I think it's even better than KPlayer. So good in fact that even Novell/SUSE and Turbolinux are using it as their default media player.

  84. Is it still used? by msh104 · · Score: 1

    I do browse a lot of websites every day, and I don't really find any REAL sites anymore, almost all of them have are now using mediaplayer... even the pr0n sites switched! the only use for realplayer I can see now is that I can legally use it for my clients without having to fear a patent war...

  85. The Story of A Shepherd Who always lied... by kc_cyrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    about wolves attacking his flocks...untill one time it REALLY happened and no one believed him anuymore.
    Now it's the same story for RealNetworks, No ONE believe them anymore after their dark past.

  86. Re:And This is Why Linux Fails... uh... no... by CdBee · · Score: 1

    OSX seems to manage pointy-clicky installs without those inherent security flaws. And as a counterpoint:

    rpm-uvh ClariaSpyware2.21.rpm

    Installing from a commandline doesn't make the applications you install safe, nor does doig it by mouse make it unsafe. It's all about how the operating system handles priviledges and warnings, and the degree of power it gives to the application.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  87. What about the EULA by internic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I stopped using Realplayer even under Windows a while back because the EULA for the newer ones, like Real One, had some seemingly nasty clauses with respect to third party apps and DRM. I think the one that got me was:

    "DRMs may be able to revoke your ability to use applicable content. RN is not responsible for the operation of the third party DRM in any way, including revocation of your content. RN is not responsible for any communications to or from any third party DRM provider, or for the collection or use of information by third party DRMs. You consent to the communications enabled and/or performed by the DRM, including automatic updating of the DRM without further notice, despite the provisions of AutoUpdate defined in Section 6(c)."

    Now maybe that's harmless, but it wasn't at all clear to me. Suffice it to say that I don't like software trying to invade my privacy and play policeman in my home. It also seems like such a system is an inherent security vulnerability and could cause technical problems even with legally licensed but un-DRMed content (like my emusic mp3s or rips of my own CDs). I think DRM is a dumb idea, but I don't mind if the software has such a feature, as long as it's not enabled unless I specifically enable it to be able to get DRMed content.

    So how is the EULA on the new realplayer? Is it any better?

    --
    "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    1. Re:What about the EULA by jschottm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work for a university and looked at the Real DRM setup this past spring. (I didn't go with it because it was too expensive for our budget.) My department offers online video classes, and I was hoping that the DRM would allow us to offer them via download or on CD/DVD-ROM to students who didn't have a good enough connection to handle streaming files.

      We would have had to protect some of the classes because some profs have intellectual property issues with what they're teaching.

      The Real DRM is a wrapper that encloses a realmedia file, and has the details of what DRM server has authority over it, and what the restrictions are. The Real client connects to the server (that my department would have owned) when it attempts to play a DRMed file and secures permission to play it. The fact that each company runs their own rights server is what they mean by third party DRM.

      Here's exactly what the clause means:

      -----
      DRMs may be able to revoke your ability to use applicable content. RN is not responsible for the operation of the third party DRM in any way, including revocation of your content.
      -----

      Translation: Real cannot control what people using its software do with it. Duh. They give a large amount of control to the entity distributing the media. If my acceptable use policy says that all of your rights will be terminated if we catch you spreading the file to unauthorized persons, we can do that serverside.

      -----
      RN is not responsible for any communications to or from any third party DRM provider, or for the collection or use of information by third party DRMs.
      -----

      Translation: Because the DRM software works by identity, there's a certain amount of data that can be collected. Real is not responsible for that any more than Apache is for people getting info from their webserver.

      -----
      You consent to the communications enabled and/or performed by the DRM, including automatic updating of the DRM without further notice, despite the provisions of AutoUpdate defined in Section 6(c).
      -----

      Real has to be able to update DRM to fix problems. They have an accountability to the users who buy a rather expensive package to maintain some kind of security.

      If you don't like it, don't use it. But there's nothing in that clause that indicates it will ever do anything to your mp3s, just secured Real files.

    2. Re:What about the EULA by internic · · Score: 1

      My issue is that while your reading seems like one possibile characterization of one's rights under the EULA, it's not at all clear that it's the only reading. Given the somewhat hysterical measures that have been taken by content companies in the last few years, I think you can probably understand my concern. Partially, this is an issue with EULAs in general. Since I'm not a lawyer (nor an expert in software for that matter), it's hard for me to be sure exactly WHAT I'm agreeing to.

      My issue is that one could give an alternate reading. "Applicable content" could be used to mean "copyrighted material, e.g. digital music", and, anyway, the next sentance "RN is not responsible for the operation of the third party DRM in any way, including revocation of your content" seems to say essentially that no matter what "applicable content is", they might do who knows what and it's ok. I understand why this is expediant, but you can see why it's unsettling.

      In fact, my problems with it would be completely resolved if they simply said that DRM features would only be enabled if you specifically agree to recieve DRMed content and would only manage that content. They don't clearly say that, though, so while that might be what they mean it leaves the user in the unpleasent sitution of signing away vaguely defined rights.

      To restate what I said at the end of my first post, I don't have a problem if people want to use DRM and the product enables that. I just don't want any part of it, and I want to be sure that if I choose not to participate that my rights will be preserved. I felt that Real One EULA didn't do that.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
  88. Yay! Now I can listen to BBC radio in Linux! by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've been waiting for a decent non-beta version of Helix/RealPlayer for Linux for a while now -- and now I can finally listen to all the output the BBC provide while working.

    Those of you who haven't browsed through the material that the BBC offer really should check it out. One of the best areas is the "Listen Again" section of BBC 7, which repeats some of the best comedy and drama in their radio archives.

    No, this isn't a paid advert for the BBC -- I'm just a very happy licence fee payer :).

  89. Two words: IBM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Two words: IBM."

    Could this be a new trend here on slashdot.....lets see.

    In soviet russia we say this when a company redeems itself...."two words: IBM."

    no i don't think so.
    stendec@gmail.com

  90. Re:One question: Why? by bwy · · Score: 1

    My problem with many mainstream media players is that they look more like a street corner in Times Square than they do a media player.

    There are widgets everywhere! Drawers here, buttons there, little flashing things here, a list of stations or channels over there, throw in a few more widgets that don't seem to do anything, and finally some widgets that are supposed to be used to hide all of the other widget-ware.

    News flash. If I want to watch a video clip, you know what? I probably want a window that contains the video clip and maybe a clean simple menu for basic functions. Thats it guys. If memory serves, QT (at least on the Mac) may be closer to this, but of course it keeps asking me if I want to go Pro. Argh. I bought the hardware and the OS from them and they still want MORE.

  91. Yay, but beware corporate loyalty by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

    Just like Real, it's not that IBM itself sucks or rocks, it's their actions that suck or rock.

    You can't really trust any corporation to act for anything but its own benefit. Right now it must benefit IBM and Real to embrace F/OSS. Well, I guess actually because it's for their benefit it would be more the "OS" than the "F". They could as easily turn around (see SCO) and become "bastards" (to us) for the same basic reason.

    (yes, I realize that a company can't undo open-sourcing something, but that doesn't make the company itself a lifetime member of the "Good Guys (tm)")

  92. Re:And This is Why Linux Fails... uh... no... by DMadCat · · Score: 1

    Not the point. The point is, in Linux, to install the program you download you have to first make it executable which is apparently too difficult for some folks. After it's executable you can run that Realplayer bin file any way you want.

    The difference is, even if you inadvertently download something malicious you generally don't have to worry about it executing itself because you haven't specified it as an executable file on your system.

  93. Debian packages already started by robla · · Score: 3, Informative

    That work is already underway

  94. can i have the bonus by trendescape · · Score: 0, Troll

    I want the spyware feature included in all the other realplayer releases. Is this still available? If so, are they open source now!?

    --
    irc.enterthegame.com #linux
  95. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Tell you how screwed up /. is?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    This IS /.!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  96. If this is so good.... by jag7720 · · Score: 1

    Why won't it play anything on http://www.real.com ? I'm all for this but come on... every link I click on returns an error... "The player does not have the capabilities to play back this content" What does it play?

  97. Re: Thanks, but no, thanks (Kaffeine) by er_col · · Score: 1
    Yes, Kaffeine is a fine program. It has two problems though.

    One is the choice of backend. So it inherits all the problems with CPU usage, A/V going out of sync and so on and so forth. Hope we aren't going to start a flamewar here. Yes, MPlayer has its own problems, but I personally prefer it over Xine.

    Second, it opens separate windows for some of its controls, while KPlayer keeps everything in one window by default.

    So I have no problem with Kaffeine, but KPlayer is by far the best choice for me. The new File Properties thing is really cool, it remembers whatever options you set for each individual file. So normalizing the volume of audio files is as easy as holding shift while dragging the volume slider.

  98. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Infidel! I will defeat you in the streets with the power of a 1000 shoes!

  99. Re:OK let's videochat between iChat and Helix Play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iChat AV doesn't really use an open protocol; it uses some unholy combination of AIM and SIP.

    Besides, you'd be better off starting with GnomeMeeting.

  100. Don't let them fool you.. by Suppafly · · Score: 0, Troll

    Real is still an asshole of a company.

  101. They still don't get it.... by menscher · · Score: 1
    Ok, so the installer lets you put the head of the directory tree where you want it, so that's a start. But they create the executables in the root of that tree, and leave an empty "Bin" (yes, with a capital B) directory. So once again I will be forced to waste time trying to fix up their install and hopefully make it functional.

    At least it doesn't have to be installed by individual users any more...

    1. Re:They still don't get it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:They still don't get it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandrake 10 official -- ERROR: Unknown error - when running the canned .RPM.

      Sorry, this isn't ready for realtime. While I could fix it., I will look elsewhere.

  102. redhat 7.3 eek by trb · · Score: 1
    Didn't work for me. I run RedHat 7.3 on a PC. I had been running RealPlayer-8.0-1 (rp8_linux20_libc6_i386_cs2.rpm). I got the new RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm and this is what happened:
    # rpm -Uvh RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm
    Preparing... ...##### [100%]
    1:RealPlayer ...##### [100%]
    # realplay
    /usr/local/RealPlayer/realplay.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    # rpm -e /tmp/RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm
    error: package /tmp/RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm is not installed
    # rpm -e rp8_linux20_libc6_i386_cs2.rpm
    error: package rp8_linux20_libc6_i386_cs2.rpm is not installed
    # rpm -Uvh rp8_linux20_libc6_i386_cs2.rpm
    Preparing... ...##### [100%]
    package RealPlayer-10.0.0.297-20040730 (which is newer than RealPlayer-8.0-1) is already installed
    #

    Ick.

    1. Re:redhat 7.3 eek by sloanster · · Score: 1

      I run RedHat 7.3 on a PC.

      You're just saying it's running on x86-class hardware, I presume...in any case, you might want to consider using a somewhat current verson of linux.

      /usr/local/RealPlayer/realplay.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

      That's odd, it seems to be looking for old compatibility libs... hmm..

      # rpm -e /tmp/RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm

      LOL, where's the cluebat? hint: you can't "remove" an rpm file, you need to remove the installed package...

    2. Re:redhat 7.3 eek by trb · · Score: 1
      LOL, where's the cluebat? hint: you can't "remove" an rpm file, you need to remove the installed package...

      Oops, right, thanks, sloanster. I did an rpm -qf on the broken binary to figure out what to rpm -e, and it erased, and now I'm back to good old rp8 lukewarm hotness.

      I had forgotten that you can't rpm -e the .rpm (I don't rpm -e very often), you have to use the package name. You'd think that rpm could Do What I Meant. D'oh.

      I realize that it would be easier if I were running something newer than rh7.3, but I have compatibility issues that keep me from doing this (involving not having time to port and test software that runs on 7.3). And really, 7.3 (2.4.18) suits my needs fine, it's sad when folks have dependencies on later versions when it's not necessary. Shouldn't I be able to run realplayer on a 2 year old OS?

      Either way, the rp 10 code shouldn't just install halfway like that, it should notice that the libstdc++.so.5 was missing, and punt the install. I posted my note as a caveat to other old school 7.3 users out there.

    3. Re:redhat 7.3 eek by sloanster · · Score: 1

      I realize that it would be easier if I were running something newer than rh7.3, but I have compatibility issues that keep me from doing this (involving not having time to port and test software that runs on 7.3). And really, 7.3 (2.4.18) suits my needs fine, it's sad when folks have dependencies on later versions when it's not necessary. Shouldn't I be able to run realplayer on a 2 year old OS?

      Is it really only 2 years old? Linux develops so rapidly that 7.3 just seems a lot older than that.

      In any case, you probably could run helixplayer on 7.3 - I just realized it's looking for a c++ library, so if you install that it just might work. That's the nice thing about apt (which is available for redhat 7.3 BTW), it would note the libc++ dependency as you mentioned, but instead of "punting" the install, it would automagically install the needed packages for you.

  103. NO ALSA - v.10 suxs by doug13 · · Score: 1

    from the readme:

    Alsa and esound drivers are not included in this build The OSS device used for playback can be set using the AUDIO environment variable. eg export AUDIO=/dev/dsp2

    1. Re:NO ALSA - v.10 suxs by Zoolander · · Score: 1

      It's not that big a deal, is it? Or am I missing something?
      I thought most people enabled the OSS compatibility options in the kernel anyway?

      --
      Meep.
  104. Windows Port? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Hey any chance of a Windows port here folks, the real player we got still sucks.

    1. Re:Windows Port? by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Call me old fashioned, but I just don't like having to sign in online to any application, especially a media player of all things! Roll on a Windows port.

  105. you forgot one: by mjbkinx · · Score: 1

    you forgot one major player on this field:
    macromedia. they sneaked their flv format (btw, ffmpeg can handle it) into flash player 6. afaik it's installed on more machines than even microsofts media player.

  106. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of these rumors about server errors! THEY ARE LIES!

    The 503s are real.
    The code appears during the execution of a troll.
    Only subscribers can see the real show.
    Trolls are nasty, but is this really the right solution?
    Definitely!
    Amnesty International is already investigating.

    *zap!* another one bites into the dust.

  107. This whole percentage thing is annoying by DevilM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    100% open source? Is that better than 80% open and 20% free? Can we start applying open source percentages to commerical software, so that we can know which software is 100% closed vs. maybe something that is 16% open.

  108. Does this mean Flash for Linux PPC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean I can see flash on my Linux Ibook????

  109. The "corporate" Windows version is harmless by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

    I left a university job 6 months ago, and one of the nagging questions that I got before I left was "WHY do you people make us download and install RealPlayer and all its adware/spyware/credit card requesting crap to view multimedia on your school's website?" Well -- at the time, licensing for adequate #'s of Windows Media-based servers was too expensive relative to the early-adopter setup of RealServer(s) around campus.

    Still, you can't get students (or parents) to like your school's website when the audio/video tours are rife with SUBSCRIBE NOW notices every time you load a presentation.

    From what I've heard, though, RealNetworks is offering a corporate version of the RealPlayer sans the adware/spyware/subscribe now bullshit. My multimedia counterpart at the school that I left says that they've made it a free download from their various website properties to avoid complaints from both prospective students and alumni alike.

    My 2 cents.

    IronChefMorimoto

  110. Gstreamer sucks-- great potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gstreamer sucks. I hate it, to me it signifies everything that is wrong with OSS.

    After years of development, they STILL haven't reached 1.0.

    The .6 branch was left in a state of complete disarray while developers jumped on the .7 and .8 branches.

    Gstreamer is a bitch to install. They instructions for major distributions like RedHat 9 were broken for a good 18 months before someone removed them, the RedHat apt-get repository was missing major RPMs. I filed bugs, talked on the IRC channel and in the mailinglists, tried to suggest fixes myself. Most developers basically told me to fuck off (but some were great).

    Compiling from source was incredibly painful-- to play basic codecs I needed to visit a dozen other websites and compile a zillion files from source.

    All in all, I think I had to download and compile 20 projects in order to get gstreamer to function at all.

    My Linux box is so polluted with crap from Gstreamer that I don't even know where to begin to clean it up (Developers: If you use 'make install', there should be a 'make uninstall').

    And after spending 20 hours on this, I still can't get Gstreamer to play most multimedia files!

    1. Re:Gstreamer sucks-- great potential by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      (Developers: If you use 'make install', there should be a 'make uninstall')

      You should be using CheckInstall.

      You invoke it with "checkinstall -t r" instead of "make install".

      It tracks the files copied during "make install" and turns them into an RPM. Cleaning them out is then just as simple as "rpm -e <packagename>".

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  111. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been using Firefox for long time, never saw a 503 error on ./

  112. Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wow, I'm impressed. It starts up instantly, there are no ads, no annoying noises at startup, etc. I'm amazed that this is Real Player! And to top it off, it didn't add an entire submenu to my GNOME Applications menu... it put itself into Multimedia. That kind of behaviour gives me a lot more respect for Real.

  113. GStreamer is where it's at. Real are golddigging. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GStreamer is where Linux multimedia frameworks are going. It has everything needed; both KDE and GNOME folks love it.

    By contrast, few people have anything good to say about Helix/Realplayer.

    I and many others have specifically asked the Real folks what it is that they're trying to provide with Realplayer/Helix that GStreamer doesn't already have. They didn't have an answer.

    Likewise, I asked them why they wouldn't contribute to the more popular GStreamer framework, if they're so interested in creating a standard. Again, no answer.

    The only reason Helix exists is that Real needs to find a new niche in order to survive, and they think the Linux community is an easy target to worm their way into. They won't even commit to an open-source (never mind Free) way of doing things (as evidenced by their site's myriad of licensing etc.), but they'll happily claim to be the number one Linux multimedia provider, and label their closed Realplayer as 'Open Source' (see the help menu in that product).

    Above all, though. It just sucks. I downloaded Realplayer and Helix. Neither of them could play a basic radio stream. Downloading the older Realplayer 8 codecs and playing through xine worked just fine. If they're that incompetent with their own products, along with all the other distain they've shown for true Open Source/Free community involvement, I for one hope they go away. Soon.

  114. Re:GStreamer is where it's at. Real are golddiggin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, no. I hate Gstreamer, and I'm really happy to see another player in the game. Maybe the Gstreamer devs will get off their asses.

    Gstreamer sucks. I hate it, to me it signifies everything that is wrong with OSS.

    After years of development, they STILL haven't reached 1.0.

    The .6 branch was left in a state of complete disarray while developers jumped on the .7 and .8 branches.

    Gstreamer is a bitch to install. They instructions for major distributions like RedHat 9 were broken for a good 18 months before someone removed them, the RedHat apt-get repository was missing major RPMs. I filed bugs, talked on the IRC channel and in the mailinglists, tried to suggest fixes myself. Most developers basically told me to fuck off (but some were great).

    Compiling from source was incredibly painful-- to play basic codecs I needed to visit a dozen other websites and compile a zillion files from source.

    All in all, I think I had to download and compile 20 projects in order to get gstreamer to function at all.

    My Linux box is so polluted with crap from Gstreamer that I don't even know where to begin to clean it up (Developers: If you use 'make install', there should be a 'make uninstall').

    And after spending 20 hours on this, I still can't get Gstreamer to play most multimedia files!

  115. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by consolidatedbord · · Score: 1

    What's this error that I see?
    I do not like this 503.
    How can this have come to be,
    Using software that is free.

    --
    while true ; do echo this is my sig; done
  116. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news company managers around the world applauded a strange and unexpected productivity increase from their IT departments.

  117. Erase cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When I removed my slashdot cookies, the problem went away.

  118. Plugin support is old news by Phaid · · Score: 1

    Just FYI, plugin support has worked since at least RealPlayer version 8.

    I currently have RP8 + the RP9 codecs installed on slackware 10, and plugin support works just fine. You just need to put raclass.zip and rpnp.so in your mozilla plugins/ dir, and make sure that "realplay" is in your PATH, and it works fine.

    Between that and mplayerplugin, I'm all set for media types. I'll consider upgrading to RP10 when I find something I can't watch with RP8/9.

  119. Scripting support! by Adnans · · Score: 1

    The most interesting thing about this release is that it seems to support player scripting! This is quite interesting when developing web based presentations.. Good stuff Real!!

    -adnans

    --
    "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
  120. Go Vick! by evangellydonut · · Score: 1

    Nice to know that us Caltech grads are making useful contributions to the world (not just when it comes to earthquakes and JPL) :-)

    1. Re:Go Vick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second that. Who said engineers don't care about the user experience? Vik's done a super job on both the Mac and Linux player releases.

      ** Don't worry about what should have been, think about what could be **

  121. It still sucks on Windows by Blic · · Score: 1, Informative

    Less so that previous versions, but it's still almost viral in its behavior. It has a component that checks for messages and "special offers" that it puts in the Registry to run when Windows runs. If you kill it off and remove it from the registry Real Player just starts it up and puts it back in the registry every time it runs.

    Unless of course you manage to find the secret setting buried in the options dialogs to turn it off, though when you try to do so there's a popup "strongly" warning you that it's a bad idea. Ha!

    1. Re:It still sucks on Windows by Blic · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? I guess someone from Real has some mod points. =)

    2. Re:It still sucks on Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Ballmer: THe news is about Realplayer 10 for *linux*, the linux version doesn't have any of the annoyances that you mention.

  122. Suffering with buffering?? by 0zzy · · Score: 1

    If you're buffering it's because of your crappy internet connection. Period. I have always preferred the sound of a well done realaudio stream over WMA for richness of sound.

  123. universal plugins? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Will Helix take XMMS plugins? Or at least an "XMMS input Plugins" plugin API connector? I don't want to leave all my other weird audio formats to rot when I switch.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  124. OT: virus spam spoof by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    You don't use the email address "bogado@visgraf.[omitted*].br", do you? Our office gets dozens of spams with that (otherwise unknow) return address daily, with various Subject:'s and attached Windows (virus) executables. By far the most popular return address of any virus spams we receive, by about 50:1 to the next most popular.

    * Primary domain name omitted.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:OT: virus spam spoof by bogado · · Score: 1

      Unfortunally, yes, this happens to be one of my emails. I used to work in the [omitted*] instituition, witch is a very respected and known arround the world research center for math. But unfortunally the cited institution has became a know place to spam and to spoof froms.

      They do have a strong security politics there. There is a very restrictive firewall between not only the inside to the outside, but also between internal subnets. Public use computers got into a fake ip subnet that have even more restrictive firewalls.

      This has not stoped spammers to find out out domain. We received a few thousands spans by day that were not even addressed to real users (current or former users included).

      I myself use and have used for years now linux only, so those email are not coming from any machine that I control. I am sorry that my email is being used for this end, but there is very little I can do to stop this. If you would like to clarify this further, please contact me in my email mangled above. :-D

      Also I would like to apoligise to the other readers, because this is somewhat off topic.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

  125. Why I want realplayer by veysey · · Score: 1

    I've been using helixplayer with mixed success. However, I've never had complaints about helix or real, under linux, in terms of "evil". I want it to work to watch cspan ... all cspan broadcasts are streamed. www.cspan.org That and MLB broadcasts. :)

  126. Re:One question: Why? by xmorg · · Score: 0, Troll

    Whats "yuk" about motif?

    Great, so now i gotta sort through my libg32423sdfjewri3jrwejw.so.1.2.3.1 libs just to use realplayer.

    installing and upgrading anything gome or gtk is a pain, and ive done it with rpm, ports, emerge or just plain source code, and something that relies son so many different lib's just to function is yuk, we all like pretty things, but in the end we use programs for what they do not what they look like.

    If you upgrade something suddenly in gtk, all of a suddon over half of your x-apps dont work. and thats "yuk". While Motif and Xt rarely ever upgrade, and apps made with them are less likely to freeze, or require extensive lib searching/installing.

  127. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    THERE ARE NO ELECTIONS! There is no better leader than CMDRTACO! You heathens who question his divine right shall be burned! ELECTIONS ARE FOR ATHEISTS AND INFIDELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  128. Re:One question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want all the widgets, why not use kmplayer?

  129. realplayer is spyware by Tanaraus · · Score: 1

    IMHO, anything that installs itself on your computer in multiple locations so that you have to contort your computer to remove it is spyware.

    realplayer is spyware
    realplayer is spyware
    realplayer is spyware

  130. Why should I trust them? by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 1

    While I respect the fact that they're trying out more friendly methods and might even give the current player a try, why should I immediately trust them again?

    They have stated in previous posts that they changed their business model. That's great, but where's the guarantee they won't change it back the moment they find out their current one isn't working?

    I'm not opposed to them in their current form but I would rather support companies I trust and know won't screw over their customers when they need to make a quick buck.

  131. after installing XINE does not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just installed Real Player 10 for linux on my ultralight laptop (Sharp MM20, Suse 9.1)

    I have XINE and Mplayer configured for use with win32 codecs; before installation they both played realvideo files without problems (South Park episodes, etc). After installation, both XINE and Mplayer lost their capability to play Real Video files. In addition RealPlayer 10 has performance problems compared to XINE and Mplayer
    (dropped frames, poor audio). Back to xine and mplayer for me!

  132. Questions by ktheory · · Score: 1

    After reading the /. description, I still have two questions:

    Is the Helix Player 100% open source?

    Does it support Ogg Vorbis and Theora?

  133. Software is math or not? by sdcmk · · Score: 1

    That sounds like a red herring. We all know that software on a theoretical level is math, like lambda calculus for example, however using that type of math you are describing a procedure. Creating software is in essence creating a technical procedure that instructs a microprocessor to accomplish something. Procedures can be patented under United States Law. Below is an excerpt from the USPO FAQ that describes what qualifies to be patented.

    "In the language of the statute, any person who "invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent," subject to the conditions and requirements of the law. The word "process" is defined by law as a process, act or method, and primarily includes industrial or technical processes. The term "machine" used in the statute needs no explanation. The term "manufacture" refers to articles that are made, and includes all manufactured articles. The term "composition of matter" relates to chemical compositions and may include mixtures of ingredients as well as new chemical compounds. These classes of subject matter taken together include practically everything that is made by man and the processes for making the products."

    2+2=4 is not a program it is an equation not a procedure. It does not instruct how to add two and two together, it only shows that in fact they are added together. If you where to say that you can add two and two together by doing X Y and Z then you have a procedure that can be patented.

    1. Re:Software is math or not? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1
      Patent: "Addition to Four (4)"

      Addition to Four is a process by which one can, using software, sequence any number of numbers together, via addition, that, when combined, equals the number four. Theses numbers can be both positive and negative integers (e.g. 2, -3, -1, 1) as well as real numbers (e.g. 2.5, 3.2, 1.234) as long as their combined total equals 4.

      Such a thing seems rediculous at first glance. However, compare it to some of the patents we've seen discussed on Slashdot.

  134. No schizophrenia required by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Use DoubleThink.
    DoubleThink: Now in new Exotic Vanilla Flavour!

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  135. no more 'buffering' jokes, please by calculadoru · · Score: 1

    People - enough already. Every time Real is mentioned on Slashdot, some smartass has to go on about buffering. I mean, come on - it used to be really bad in the old days, but Real have learnt their lesson and improved the damned thing, so it's now way easier to...buffering...buffering...

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  136. Is it good news? by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    The codecs are still binary, so there you are.

    Which makes me wonder what's really going on here. The poster who started this /. thread said "The Helix Player is 100% open source, (now including the GPL!)...". One wonders if the player can be redistributed by anyone or if the player is improperly licensed.

    If I can't supply "complete corresponding source code" (to quote the GPL) to the program, or if I can't make good on a written promise to supply said source code, then I can't distribute it under the GNU GPL. I wonder this because of RMS' interpretation of plugins. Considering the case where plugins (such as codecs might be) are a derivative work of the master program, I have to wonder if the program is improperly licensed and, despite the licensing attempt, is not actually copyleft free software as the license intends.

    1. Re:Is it good news? by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      What's going on here is that Real is trying to win over the Slashdot crowd. People who don't like MS Windows itself, but do like the Microsoft/proprietary software business model. The people who get worked up over Crossover Office, Doom III, and NVidia drivers.

      What also might be going on is that Real is trying to siphon developer support from Mplayer, Xine, and GStreamer, so that Real binary codecs will be "first class citizens" in the community.

  137. screen shots no more possible by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 1

    I found real player 10 for linux quite good, until
    realizing a built in DRM feature: It is no more possible to grab a frame (window grabbing) with
    import ppm:- >test.pnm
    This used to work before. Confirms: for
    proprietary software, keep backups of the old
    versions.

  138. No problems with Opera by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    I don't even know what everyones talking about in regards this problem & my Opera 7.23 Win32 install beens logging onto slashdot every day since before it was a Opera 4 install, & the only problem I had with Slasdot was a Pink screen I had for about a week a couple of years ago.

  139. Also... (more).. by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    No more tray icons/startup processes without permision & no more file extension theivery from other programs without permision either.

    It's quite good the way the advanced install button lets one chose what file extensions get opened by by Realplayer 10.

    Pity there's no install options like "only link so far un-attributed media file types to Realplayer 10" or "only open Real developed file types with Realplayer 10", as going through that media file extension list took longer than I liked.

  140. And of course for X86_64 by niall2 · · Score: 1

    If they build it...it wont work. Sort of that field of dreams meets a 64 bit bus.

    $ realplay

    (realplay.bin:8666): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "bluecurve",
    Failed to load pixbuf file: /opt/RealPlayer/share/realplay/icon.png: Unable to load image-loading module: /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-p ng.so: /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-p ng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

    (realplay.bin:8666): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: file gdk-pixbuf-io.c: line 762 (gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file): assertion `error == NULL || *error == NULL' failed

    (realplay.bin:8666): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: file gdk-pixbuf-io.c: line 762 (gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file): assertion `error == NULL || *error == NULL' failed

    And of course I can't get the source and build from scratch so...we'll probably have to wait for Fedora 3.

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
  141. "100% open source"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blurb says it's "100% open source", but when I run it the first time the "Setup Assistant" wantns me to accept a License Agreement that starts out:

    REDISTRIBUTION NOT PERMITTED

    Methinks Real has a different idea of what a GPL-compatible, open-source license is than I do.

  142. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by baker_tony · · Score: 0

    Haha! That is actually very well written. Beauty in simplicity. Cheers for posting something that actually made me laugh a bit, first time in a long time reading crashdot

  143. Re:One question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats "yuk" about motif?

    Programming for it being gigantic pain in the ass? Generally ugly appearance? Absolutely horrible file picking dialogs? (Fucking hell, those things suck!) More or less stagnated development?

  144. Re:GStreamer is where it's at. Real are golddiggin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny. I can just "apt-get install" it. Maybe you should blame your distro, rather than the project. Or maybe you should realise that 1.0 means stable, and they're entirely right to spend years getting to 1.0 if that's what it takes. And they're also entirely right to move on to 0.7+ if they feel 0.6 is flogging a dead horse. That's what happens when you develop against rapidly-changing APIs.

  145. Re:THERE ARE NO 503 ERRORS!! QUIT SPREADING LIES!! by consolidatedbord · · Score: 1

    I posted it AC the other day....+5 funny... post it like that....don't get shit. :(

    --
    while true ; do echo this is my sig; done
  146. Wow! AAC binaries! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    I had very much trouble getting iTunes-ripped AAC files played on Linux - because the XMMS plugins don't even compile, pre-built binaries aren't available because Dolby is being annoying about licensing, and the FAAD binaries are rather problematic.

    Then, RealPlayer 10 beta. Wham! Works right away!

    Dolby-blessed AAC binaries for Linux = GOOD.

  147. Re: Linux/PPC version available here by zero0w · · Score: 1