Slashdot Mirror


Racial Issues Alleged In GTA San Andreas, Other Games

Thanks to the New York Times (free reg. req.) for its article exploring possible racial stereotyping inherent in many videogames. The article alleges: "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas... underscores what some critics consider a disturbing trend: popular video games that play on racial stereotypes, including images of black youths committing and reveling in violent street crime." Partially, though not wholly related to a recently discussed article on 'street' videogames, it's also argued: "The issue, critics say, is not that the games' representation of racial and ethnic minorities is as blatantly threatening as the sort found at hate sites on the Web, where players are asked to gun down virtual black or Jewish characters. Rather, the racial and ethnic depictions and story lines are more subtle, and therefore, some say, more insidious."

189 comments

  1. racial stereotypes by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So we're supposed to ignore the last 4 GTA titles just because the one coming up will have a black character to represent the player?

    Only white people can commit violence in video games now? And here I thought people were complaining because there weren't enough minorities in video games, now you can't put them into video games without someone complaining about the way they're portrayed (come on, this isn't like that Duke3D-engine game from a few years ago featuring an Asian protagonist, but then no one complained about the depiction of white people in Redneck Rampage, either).

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
    1. Re:racial stereotypes by sporty · · Score: 1

      No, not white people can only commit crimes. "redneck" is a very demeaning term. Just like "white trash".

      If the movie industry can mix it up between a black or a white president, why can't a black or a white person commit a crime? And you should have complained about Redneck Rampage, otherwise you have little reason to complain now.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:racial stereotypes by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "redneck" is a very demeaning term. Just like "white trash".
      I'm probably missing your point, but...

      I've never heard of anyone describe themselves as "white trash", but I've heard a lot of people proudly describe themselves as "rednecks" and do what they can to fit the stereotype.

      One bizarre experience for me, as someone who doesn't consider anything positive about rednecks (by reputation or by experience), was one of my neighbours coming over, saying he was born in Florida (I live in Florida) and that he's a redneck through-and-through and proud of it. He then, after saying this, told me he was having problems with his girlfriend because she "was lower class".

      Now, funny thing is I know there are mods here itching to mod me down because of the logic in the last paragraph, but in some ways that proves the point - there are people who consider "redneck" a positive word, even when associated with all the things we generally associate with rednecks.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:racial stereotypes by justkarl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So we're supposed to ignore the last 4 GTA titles just because the one coming up will have a black character to represent the player?

      No, we're not. The first one was passed off as a fad before the second came out, and it's top-down view wasn't real enough to cause a stir. When 3 came out, the ultra real gang violence was attacked by several groups, and Vice City was nearly pulled from shelves several times because of racial-related violence(anybody remember the"kill the cubans" line? It's not in versions made after about 9 months ago). I wouldn't really agree that this is the first GTA game to draw contraversy, and I certainly wouldn't agree that it's only because he's black.

    4. Re:racial stereotypes by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, we're not. The first one was passed off as a fad before the second came out, and it's top-down view wasn't real enough to cause a stir. When 3 came out, the ultra real gang violence was attacked by several groups, and Vice City was nearly pulled from shelves several times because of racial-related violence(anybody remember the"kill the cubans" line? It's not in versions made after about 9 months ago). I wouldn't really agree that this is the first GTA game to draw contraversy, and I certainly wouldn't agree that it's only because he's black.

      The Italians didn't get much press coverage if they were complaining about the protagonist of the first game. Yes, the violence itself was an issue, and probably will remain an issue (and it was in the first and second games as well, despite your own down-playing of it due to the top-down view, the very idea that you could car-jack someone in a game caused controversy). The "Kill the Cubans/Haitians" thing, as you noted, didn't have an effect until maybe a year ago, and Vice City was released almost 2 years ago. It had already sold most of the copies it will sell for the PS2 and PC before the controversy over those lines even started, and the fact that they pulled it precisely shows how rediculous this whole thing is (after all, the gangs called themselves The Cubans and The Haitians, and it was the latter that got the lines pulled, not the Cubans).

      My point was not that this was the first to draw controversy. My point was simply to point out that this game has not changed in any fundamental line from the previous 2, and it's drawing this particular controversy simply because the main character (and many of the characters in the game's setting, I'd imagine) is black, instead of being of European descent like the previous games. People weren't complaining about the main character's ethnicity or even the ethnicity of most of the other characters in the games before (the "kill the cubans/haitians" thing had everything to do with the exact statement, or it wouldn't have stopped with the modification of a couple of sound files), they simply complained about the violence in general terms.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:racial stereotypes by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      Here in Oregon I hear people claiming white trash with pride quite often. Kinda helps boots the trucker hat fad going around out here.

  2. Let's ban ghettos! by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's ban ghettos! In there you will find all these stereotypes walking around where anyone can see them! Even little children. Save the little children!

    1. Re:Let's ban ghettos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wouldn't mind. There'd be a lot less stolen DVD players.

    2. Re:Let's ban ghettos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot less DVD bootlegs too.

    3. Re:Let's ban ghettos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, but first we'd have to ban slumlords and government assistance programs that require you to have low maximum bank account balances in order to continue to recieve help. (Sure makes saving money hard.) We might have to get rid of rich people in order to get rid of the class system we have in the US as well.

    4. Re:Let's ban ghettos! by ThndrShk2k · · Score: 1

      You know, if history serves me right... Ghettos where "banned" around 1945. But you know, slang terms for slum like areas where not my forté

      --

      ~--~
      Do not mind the one with the crazy, for he is sane
  3. slightly offtopic, but not... by kisrael · · Score: 4, Informative

    Today's Slate featured piece was by a black woman lawyer called Racist Like Me...it raises some interesting points about how the accusation of racism tends to be a conversation- (and thought-) stopper, and how as a culture we should probably be more engaged in this kind of discussion.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  4. Terrible, terrible distortion of reality by iainl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't these people at DMA know that LA gangs of the early nineties were uniformly white?

    Oh. Never mind.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  5. Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by happyhippy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Name one film that didnt have a black character acting as a home boy gangsta wise cracking rapper.

    1. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by nempo · · Score: 1

      the Leathal weapon series and predator 2 to name a few.

      --
      --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
    2. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who among us can forget Dick Van Dyke's superb ghetto stylings in Mary Popacapinyoass? A spoonful of sugar? Kids these days and their drug slangs.

    3. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by BlueCup · · Score: 4, Funny

      Schindlers List. =D

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    4. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dick Van Dyke wasn't black. He was just covered in soot.

    5. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by RotJ · · Score: 1

      Ghost Dog has a black character acting as a home boy samurai who raises pigeons and reads Hagakure. It also has old Italian gangsters who watch Itchy & Scratchy and listen to hip-hop. And a black Haitian ice-cream salesman who speaks only French.

    6. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by RotJ · · Score: 1

      It's weird that you only list movies that have Danny Glover in them. Why don't you add some Morgan Freeman to the mix?

    7. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of my favourite films - for those above facts.

      adding to the mix you could have the Manchurian Candidate movie.

      or 24 (not movies i know) - a black president.

    8. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      Oh there was one there, he just happened to be first up against the wall, so you might have missed him.

      Let that be a warning...

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    9. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by AntDaniel · · Score: 1
      Erm....

      At least one Lethal Weapon features blacks in gang situations. (Doesn't on kid get mowed down by an uzi after messing around with a gang?)

      And predator 2 had a gang on columbian (?) drug dealers.

      So these can't be used as a purer than pure situation.

    10. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Name one film that didnt have a black character acting as a home boy gangsta wise cracking rapper."

      Dinosaur?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Star Wars? Lando, Mace Windu, both were just normal people in the movie. Race isn't even mentioned. Of course, with all those aliens, a little skin coloration doens't mean much.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    12. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Most under-rated movie of all time. I LOVE Ghost Dog.

    13. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 1
      I have two problems with this comment.

      1) If it were accurate, it would have said "Name one Bruckheimer film that didn't have a black character acting as a home boy gangsta wise cracking rapper."

      2) It doesn't excuse Rockstar's blatant racial stereotyping. GTA3 did it too, and Midnight Club. Rockstar seems to think that humor == racial stereotypes, and it sucks.

      I think Rockstar is doing more to tarnish the reputation of the game industry than any other company currently. It's pretty crappy that their games are the ones selling the most.

    14. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by H4d0k3n · · Score: 1

      WTF?!?!?!?!? .... I'm calm now...but seriously wtf? I don't see any problems with rockstar putting black people in gangs and committing crimes and putting racial stereo-types into the game. Guess what, it's called a stereo-type for a reason. Not all black people are in gangs, but some of them are. Rockstar just chooses to put those in here. If you want to show what else can happen, the opposite of all these stereo-types than you go right ahead and make a game about a columbian man who works his ass off and raises to the top of a company. I'm sure it'll sell perfectly. I mean if parents want to shit a brick just because of what appears in these games then they have some serious problems. Considering the fact that they can: 1. Not buy the fucking game 2. Talk, yes, fucking talk to their kids about stereo-types and how it's all wrong and shit 3. Fucking deal with it Wait, that might not have been the best way to state my argument...Instead let me close with the following: fucking n00b

    15. Re:Hollywood movies are worse at stereotyping by nempo · · Score: 1

      Those where the movies that came to my mind at the time.

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000932/
      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000418/
      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000151/
      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000168/
      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000552/
      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000648/

      I'm sure you can find 'a few' movies at those links that don't sterotype. It's really not that hard to dig something up.

      --
      --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
  6. Goddamn whities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Always busy bitching about crap and not taking any action. In fact, I'm going to write a game where you're white and all you can do it bitch about stuff. Someone mugs you? You can start a commitee and bitch about it with other whities. Someone kicks your dog? You can start a commitee and bitch about it with other whities. Someone nuked your backyard with an old russian ICBM? You can start a commitee and bitch about it with other whities.

    Ps, I'm white; Seth

    1. Re:Goddamn whities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to make a game, how about one where you get sent out on torture missions every time some self-righteous piece of shit complains about a video game?

      "Agent X, we've had a report that some dipshit woman with no critical thinking skills is blaming Doom 3 for her son's aggression towards their small dog, and wants the game banned. You know what to do. As always, if you or any of your team are caught or killed, the agency will present an essay on why this whiny bitch should be removed from the gene pool"

    2. Re:Goddamn whities. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      The game is called "Congress" and the price tag to get in is a little too high for most people.

    3. Re:Goddamn whities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist! :) I'm going to go bitch about you to other whites.

  7. Whatever. by jpmkm · · Score: 1

    Somebody make a game with all white people and let's see what the blacks have to say about that. You just can't win.

    1. Re:Whatever. by slungsolow · · Score: 5, Funny

      They've been making hockey games for years. I haven't heard a black person complain about that yet.

    2. Re:Whatever. by mausmalone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can probably name a couple dozen all-white (or, more to the point, all-Japanese) games off the top of my head, and I'm sure that the've largely gone un-acknowledged. What I have a harder time naming is any games where an inteligent main (or at least important) character was black, latino, etc ...

      I personally never found it very surprising that sports games sell well among minorities. They're one of the few genres of game where you can count on seeing successful minorities being judged solely on thier abilities, accomplishments, and occasionally team affiliation. (c'mon, we all have rivalries :P )

      Oh, and as far as Rockstar using racial stereotypes in their games... no guff chet. You can be offended if you choose, but at least don't act so surprised.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    3. Re:Whatever. by RotJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I have a harder time naming is any games where an inteligent main (or at least important) character was black, latino, etc ...

      Grim Fandango: Strong latino characters. Dead, but still latino.

      Gabriel Knight: Smart, female Japanese sidekick.

      Intelligent black characters? I'm having a hard time coming up with one. James Earl Jones as GDI Supreme Commander in Tiberian Sun?

      It's not good that we have to think for 20 minutes to remember any intelligent minority game characters.

    4. Re:Whatever. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      It's not good that we have to think for 20 minutes to remember any intelligent minority game characters.

      Try thinking about intelligent game characters in general. Your average game character, if given any personality, is more along the lines of Duke Nukem than Gordon Freeman (who never speaks, but we can suppose to be smart because of where he works...). Not to mention that we have an awful lot of animals and weird anime characters, with the latter often causing us to have a hard time determining sex, let alone intelligence and race.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:Whatever. by Spankophile · · Score: 1

      It's not good that we have to think for 20 minutes to remember any intelligent minority game characters.


      Sure it's good!! That just means that minorities are so well integrated in society that you don't even notice! Isn't that the point?

      ...and for the record, you play as a Black guy in Unreal 2.

    6. Re:Whatever. by fullmetal55 · · Score: 3, Informative

      now now, there are black people in the NHL, to name just a few Grant Fuhr (Goalie - Edmonton Oilers during their dynasty years in the 80s) Freddie Braithwaite (Goalie - Edmonton Oilers, St Louis Blues, and others) Mike Grier (forward) Anson Carter (forward) Jarome Iginla (forward) and many more whos names escape me at this point.

    7. Re:Whatever. by AntDaniel · · Score: 1
      Tony Hawks Underground?

      If there was any negative representation it was minor, and only while the character was establishing himself.

    8. Re:Whatever. by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...What I have a harder time naming is any games where an inteligent main (or at least important) character was black, latino, etc...

      I bet the main character in GTA:SA is both intelligent and likeable. I'm not saying he won't be violent and associated with a gang, but I bet he's intelligent.

    9. Re:Whatever. by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Just to spell out what I'm saying a little more, it seems like there are two complaints:

      A) There aren't many black characters in video games.
      B) When there are black characters in video games, they are either violent characters or athletes.

      Well, most popular video games are sports games or shooters of some kind. Therefore, most major characters will be violent characters or athletes. To solve problem (A) would be to exacerbate problem (B). To completely solve problem (B) would nearly eliminate black characters from games, putting problem (A) back in the fore.

      Personally, I think GTA:SA will probably be relatively fair (remember I said relatively). Showing violence isn't the worst thing. I bet the guys at Rockstar will be looking to movies like "Boyz N the Hood" for inspiration and tone, and the main characters will come off no worse than the main characters in past GTA games.

    10. Re:Whatever. by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      Gordon wasn't smart, didn't you read the expose in PCXL? His major was Shopping cart pushing with a minor in astrophysics!

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    11. Re:Whatever. by Omerna · · Score: 1

      I don't know for sure, but I'd be willing to bet there aren't enough blacks in the NHL to fill a full roster.

      --


      No sig for you.
    12. Re:Whatever. by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      but its far from the "White only club" that its made out to be. sure there's a lot of Europeans play it, and not many blacks, but thats hardly the NHLs fault... and I think if I looked into it you might not be able to have an entire team, but certainly a line or two. i didn't even mention Georges Laraque, or Donald Brashear, or Sean Brown. and several others. you could get two lines, (11-12 guys).

    13. Re:Whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freelancer -

      Jun'ko Zain, the main character's partner. Asian.

  8. blame hollywood by OleMoudi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As they are the first who introduced those stereotypes. These kind of videogames such as GTA only try to emulate cinema through development of characters and plots similar to those seen on common blockbuster titles at big screen.

    --
    ---------
    Thinking never hurt anybody --MacGyver
    1. Re:blame hollywood by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Hollywood? Try walking around in newark nj for a day...

    2. Re:blame hollywood by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Hollywood didn't invent these stereotypes, they borrowed them from Watts, just a few miles down the road. My wife is a cop in south LA, guess how many white gang members she's run into?

      There's a reason these stereotypes exist, and it's not because some white movie producer wants to keep the blacks and latinos down. If the black and latino communities are upset about this image then they should quit whining about it and maybe try doing something about their gang problem.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  9. If you want offensive.. by lowmagnet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you want offensive, something worse. In other words, get over yourselves, people.

    --
    Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    1. Re:If you want offensive.. by 706GL · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine a situation where wearing that shirt wouldn't get your ass kicked.

      --
      ...
  10. A question about the figures... by Bazzargh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "he prominence of black characters in those story lines is all the more striking because of the narrow range of video games in which blacks have been present, if present at all, over the years. A 2001 study by Children Now, for example, found that of 1,500 video-game characters surveyed, 288 were African-American males - and 83 percent of those were represented as athletes."

    I was curious - how many of the 1500 were hedgehogs? Racoons? Demon imps?

    I checked the report this figure was lifted from:
    http://www.childrennow.org/media/video-game s/2001/

    "White characters were the majority in the video game population (56%)" - thats as opposed to 19% being african-american males (see above). That's compared to the real US population which is 80% white and roughly 7% african-american males (see http://www.census.gov/statab/www/poprace.html) - even ignoring for a moment that many games originate in Japan where the racial mix is even more skewed.

    The accusations of stereotyping and the narrow range of games including such characters ring true, but the "if present at all" remark is completely unsupported by the figures - if anything african-american males are quite over-represented in games. Although not to the extent of space aliens, who make up less than 1% of the real population.

    Living in the UK, I'd ask - where are the asian characters? (apart from japanese/chinese). Our population is about 5% from the indian subcontinent, but I can't recall ever playing a game with indian or pakistani characters.

    1. Re:A question about the figures... by Alphasnail · · Score: 1

      Here's a summary of what your average American knows about India and Pakistan:
      -- Apu from the Simpsons is funny.
      -- Curry smells funny.

    2. Re:A question about the figures... by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      I want more Asian characters, too (hot chicks, preferably ;), but I also find
      the lack of Indian etc. characters disturbing. I wanted one in City of Heroes,
      but all the faces look decidedly Caucacian :(

      (Skintones are varied. Blue, green, brown, black, red, pink, whatever - but only
      five or so faces!)

    3. Re:A question about the figures... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      Our population is about 5% from the indian subcontinent, but I can't recall ever playing a game with indian or pakistani characters.

      "Dhalsim flame!"

      And Streetfighter II is certainly not unique in that the cast of characters to choose from represent many different countries and cultures.

    4. Re:A question about the figures... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good thing they put in Guile. "For Americans to play."

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:A question about the figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prince of Persia, Defenders of Oasis, Magic Carpet... and of course Dhalsim.

    6. Re:A question about the figures... by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      hmmm.. indian characters in games seem to either be rubbing lamps or blowing torrents of curry-induced flame whilst surrounded by elephants. of course, almost the entire street fighter cast is pretty much a collection of racial stereotypes, but what about games like prince of persia and the like? i don't know of any games which feature prominent indian characters who aren't horribly blatant stereotypes.

      same thing with arabs... almost without exception, an arab in a videogame==terrorist.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    7. Re:A question about the figures... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to visit brazil, I might run into some green-skinned, spinning mutant a la Blanka. :)

      But seriously, stereotypes are not always bad. There really are traits that span large groups of people. When you want to convey what country/culture a character is from and you can only convey that information through some graphics then your only choice is to dress the characters in a sterotypical/traditional outfit from that country and/or give the characters recognizable physical characteristics. e.g. liederhosen and blond hair for a german and a kimono and dark hair for japanese. Sure, some folks may do it to be insulting or out of ignorance, but I also think a lot of them just do it out of necessity.

    8. Re:A question about the figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Though the word isn't used in that sense in North America, many Indians (from India) consider themselves Caucasian and don't associate that word with skin color. If you ignore skin color, many poeple in India have facial features closer to what North Americans call "Caucasians" than to their neighbors to the north and east.

      Of course, "caucasian" doesn't have any meaningful definition anyhow, as the concept of race is a social rather than scientific distinction; but the original definition of caucasian included people in India:

      ...To this first variety belong the inhabitants of Europe ( except the Lapps and the remaining descendants of the Finns) and those of Eastern Asia, as far as the river Obi, the Caspian Sea and the Ganges; and lastly, those of Northern Africa.
      The Ganges is in India, of course.
    9. Re:A question about the figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On /. the racism is more pronounced
      -- THEY are taking OUR jobs

      What's worse is most Americans don't even know the important stuff like
      -- They have nukes

    10. Re:A question about the figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... look I remember the issue of Nintendo Power where the editors made a, ahem, joke about Dhalsim's yoga flame coming from curry. Yes, it was hysterically funny (not!) however, it wasn't really the source of Dhalsim's yoga flame. It's a supernatural power gained from intense study of yoga, much like his ability to float in mid-air.

    11. Re:A question about the figures... by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

      but i thought his mid-air floating thing was from the curry, too? I mean, that stuff can really do a number on the pipes... I thought he floated because of his gas.

    12. Re:A question about the figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in the UK, I'd ask - where are the asian characters?

      They're in Persia.

  11. bahahahaha *choke* hahahaha *wheeze* by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You nailed it, I think. I was going to post something very similar, but I think you said it better than I could.

    However, I would also like to point something else out. GTA is about gangs and street violence. The reality is that, while people like those complaining don't like to talk about it, there are many gangs composed of specific races. Italian mafia, black gangstas, Latino, Irish, gangs composed just generally of white people(ie. white-supremacist groups), and as the OP pointed out, white rednecks.

    Rockstar didn't create the current situation. In fact, that they are making video-games that reflect a little bit of reality can only bring attention to the issue, which can only be good.

    Do people like the writer of the article want us all to put our fingers in our ears and close our eyes?

    Fucking idiots. Why don't people put pressure on these groups who are actually committing violence? I guess that would make too much sense.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:bahahahaha *choke* hahahaha *wheeze* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why don't people put pressure on these groups who are actually committing violence?

      Because they have guns.

    2. Re:bahahahaha *choke* hahahaha *wheeze* by joper90 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guns don't kill people ... w'rappers do.. -GLC

  12. Speaking of Asian developed games by llevity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have you ever noticed the lack of asian characters in Japanese developed games? Most characters seem to be cookie cutter caucasians. FFX is one of the few that comes to mind that had any characters with asian features, and even then, there was a disparity between the in game look of the characters and their look in the CG cinemas. They looked caucasian in the normal gameplay, and had asian features in the CGs.

    1. Re:Speaking of Asian developed games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I've had to post as AC to keep my mod points in this topic)

      There's a general rule of Japanese video games and anime/manga: if the character looks white, they are usually Japanese. The hair color of the character is supposed to relate to the personality of the character. (I also heard it was to make the characters more identifiable, since there really is no such thing as a blonde- or red-haired Japanese person. Perhaps if more Japanese women had sex with Caucasians, there'd be a few. :-))

      Also, I suppose it is difficult to get the rendering perfect on a human face. So, if we have a blocky character (like in FFVII), then we use our imagination/knowledge to get an idea of the appearance of the character. Depending on the amount of effort put into the character-shapes (non-cut-scenes), the character could appear more as its intended race/ethnicity or less. Otherwise, you have to rely on a game book to tell you the characters race/ethnicity/sex or judge the character based on his or her name.

      Note: character "genericalness" is sometimes a good thing, particular if you want to sell to a wide an audience as possible. Detailing every little thing about a character may turn some people off if it doesn't suit them.

  13. Affirmative Action by Detritus · · Score: 3, Funny

    What we need is federal affirmative action programs for criminal street gangs. If we can't bust them for illegal weapons or dope, we can smother them with greedy lawyers.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  14. Racism, pure and simple by ALeavitt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This definitely sounds like racism to me. A white, Italian stereotype can go around gunning down anyone he wants, but as soon as he has to kill members of a Haitian gang, it's racist. But make the protagonist black, and all of a sudden it's reinforcing stereotypes and represents racism against African-Americans? Come on! There's a United Negro College Fund. If there were a United Caucasian College Fund, these same people would be crying racist. Yes, it is racist. It's racist that there is such a dichotomy - what's acceptable for one race isn't acceptable for another, and vice versa. This is just further evidence of the absence of racial equality in our society. The fact is, though, that in many regards it's skewed opposite the way many people believe it is.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    1. Re:Racism, pure and simple by cyber0ne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there were a United Caucasian College Fund, these same people would be crying racist.

      Good point. I wonder what the average member of any given racial minority in the US would feel if we somehow magically eliminated this dichotomy. On the one hand, they would gain full equality in the minds of everyone around them. On the other hand, they would lose all social programs geared towards helping them for other other reason than they are a minority.

      I work in an office building which houses many state programs (I won't name the state) and see on a daily basis the countless people who come through here filing for this and applying for that. I see a lot of money going to do (I hope) a lot of good. The social issue at large is a nice thing to discuss and/or complain about, but would that be of any consolation to Mr. John Q. Public in his unending quest to feed his family?

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Racism, pure and simple by dorlthed · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a United Negro College Fund. If there were a United Caucasian College Fund, these same people would be crying racist.

      It's not a dichotomy, in that there is no "white culture", and whites are not a minority, nor even are they one uniform group that could be construed as a minority if they were. More importantly, there is no NEED for a United Caucasian College Fund, in a cultural sense. Sure, there are plenty of needy white kids who need money to go to college, but the difference is that there is no decades-old, concerted effort to advance the standing of white people in society, nor does there need to be.

      The UNCF, for example, is a fund set up *BY BLACK PEOPLE* to support young members of their own culture. If there was a UCCF, would it be to support young members of the white culture? No, because there is no white culture. Keep in mind, however, that there are plenty of scholarships for Italians, Jews, etc, who DO have their own communities and cultures, and wish to advance the standing of their young people in society. They just don't have as much clout or publicity.

    3. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Zed2K · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I think the point is that there should be NO race based programs at all. Black, white, doesn't matter. If you want to go to college the applications should NOT ask what your race is. Race should not matter in anything. But since it does seem to matter to so many people it is a very one sided thing.

      White, middle class, males have the raw end of the deal. And its only going to get worse.

    4. Re:Racism, pure and simple by mattnl · · Score: 1

      white, middle class males have always had the best deal there is. we have always been able to get what we want with no govermental/societal/social rad blocks keeping us back. we don't need help.

      on the other hand, a lot of minority groups have been systematically pushed down by institutions like universities for hundreds of years.

      have you ever heard of a "no white man" policy at a country club? but there are still some "no jews" and "no black" policies in north america.

      so who's getting the "raw end of the deal"?

    5. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a dichotomy, in that there is no "white culture"

      If there's no white culture, whose culture have I been living in all my life? For that matter, who buys those singing fish and commemorative NASCAR plates? Seriously, though, you seem to be confused about what culture is.

      and whites are not a minority

      Racism has nothing to do with whether a race is a minority.

      nor even are they one uniform group that could be construed as a minority if they were.

      You mean not all white people are white? How the heck do you define a group of people by a common characteristic and then pretend that the group isn't uniform? I could turn this around and accuse you of racism for insinuating that all black people must be the same in any way besides skin color.

      More importantly, there is no NEED for a United Caucasian College Fund, in a cultural sense.

      Whether that's true or not, it's completely tangential to the point in contention. I invite you to return from your sidetrip into irrelevance and rejoin the actual conversation.

      For what it's worth, I agree with the grandparent. Special treatment based on race is inherently racist, regardless of motive.

    6. Re:Racism, pure and simple by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      white, middle class males have always had the best deal there is. we have always been able to get what we want with no govermental/societal/social rad blocks keeping us back. we don't need help.

      As a white, middle class male the only choice I had when going to college was to pay for it myself (though I got a minor scholarship due to a GPA in the top 10% of my class and strong SAT scores). The beauty of middle class is that you can live a day-to-day life fairly well, but most middle class parents can't afford to send their kids to college. The beauty of our student aid system is that as soon as the boxes "white" and "male" were checked on the application, the only thing left for them to look at before laughing at me until I went to the bank for a loan was my parents' income, despite the fact that they didn't pay a cent for the time I spent in college.

      On the other hand, the good side of things is that very few people are ineligible for a student loan. The bad side is that student loans do have a cap, so that if your parents are unwilling to take the risk of taking out a loan for you, you're probably still screwed (yes, my parents made me pay off the student loan they took out, which was what we had agreed to before they would even sign the loan paperwork).

      The point should be to remove the existing blocks, not to generate new ones by trying to promote those that were harmed in the past. So long as we treat race as a reason to give any one person a benefit over another, racism will have a foundation upon which to remain (that isn't to say it's the only foundation, it's simply one of many fuels in the fire).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:Racism, pure and simple by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      You mean not all white people are white? How the heck do you define a group of people by a common characteristic and then pretend that the group isn't uniform? I could turn this around and accuse you of racism for insinuating that all black people must be the same in any way besides skin color.

      It would be like calling all black people African... oh, wait.

      It's all pretty stupid, but in the end it's the refusal to accept that race and behavior are not irrefutably linked that makes someone racist. Maybe someday we can get beyond that point and get down to the point of "white", "black", "red", "yellow", and "brown" are not races at all, but rather someone's arbitrary determination of skin color.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    8. Re:Racism, pure and simple by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      So tell me, what's "black culture"?

      I can understand how there is no "white culture" or god forbid, "Asian culture", seeing as how they all come from the same place, so I think it's kind of neat that there is a single cultural definition for people who very recently (I mean, what's 150+ years?) were forcibly relocated to the US from that tiny ethnically and societally homogenous place called Africa. I'm sure our Italian friends with ancestors from such closely connected communities as Sicily and Piemonte would agree with you that such a definition of a pretty arbitrarily delineated group's "culture" deserves of recognition.

      Honestly. I'm not calling into question the existence of the UNCF. I think it's great that a group which statistically is not so prosperous builds an organization to change the status quo on its own. However, your incredibly broad generalization of "culture" as such is pretty uninformed, and I'd venture so far as to say insulting towards people with ancestors in Smorgasbjord, Sweden or Bulubumbu, Congo, whom you so simplistically lump into "white" and "black".

      As for your logic regarding "the standing of white people in society", I think it's a pretty fucking sad statement on society today that you have to differentiate between poor bastards who can't afford college on their own, based solely on race.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    9. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      ...yet illegal immigrants and kids of them (sure, they're legal NOW...) go to school for free in this country. Hell, Bush will even pay for their housing, food, crack habit and their 32 kids. And all the while, not one member of the god-damned family speaks a word of english.

      This will probably get marked down as a troll, and that's fine because this isn't the proper forum, but I'm so sick of hearing that this country & government is racist. We spend more money helping 3rd world nations than we should, while, back home within our own country, we've got homeless sleeping on the streets, kids having to live with and be raised by crack-heads and a lot of AMERICANS (born and raised, not immigrants) can't afford to put food on their tables or go to college.

      Then, to boot, we start out sourcing... But that's another off-topic post on another article...

      (-1 Troll) Here I come!!

    10. Re:Racism, pure and simple by ADH2151 · · Score: 1

      There is a UNCF because for over 200 years blacks were held down in society as slaves. And up to today blacks are still feeling the impacts from that. To set up a UNCF or anything to help blacks out is a great thing. After all those years of suffering up until present day. For people to tell blacks to "just forget about" it or to say "it happened in the past, get over it" is pure crap. As a black male in society that odds are stacked against me more than any other person in the USA that I will ever make it or ecome successful. In America a C average white man can become president while a B average black man has to struggle to try and make it into colleg or get a job at McDonalds. So, until you know what is really happening y'all better check yourself.

    11. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, George Bush makes everyone look bad, you can't bring him up in a conversation.. that's just taking pot shots..

      The fact that I only got performance-based scholarships to go to college, even though I applied for and was rejected from need-based scholarships (on a family income of around 25k a year) doesn't make me happy, but I "got over it" and moved on.

      I'm not saying there are not racial problems in this world, but affirmative action-type programs are always going to alienate people. Why let it alienate the more qualified people?

    12. Re:Racism, pure and simple by ALeavitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you arguing for black equality, or for oppression of other races to make up for things in the past? The fact of the matter is, there is no equality in programs like Affirmative Action or in the UNCF. Were there to be a UWCF, blacks would cry foul and rail against being excluded and oppressed. Black students often get into colleges based on lower standards than those that other students have to meet. Credentials are credentials, regardless of skin color, but when skin color is taken into account there seems to be a difference in the credentials expected for a certain position. I have seen some of my (white) friends rejected from colleges and jobs in favor of (black) people who are barely able to read at a sixth-grade level.
      Now, please don't misconstrue this as a racist comment, as I know many intelligent black people and many stupid white people (and intelligent and stupid members of every race, creed, etc. etc.) However, I have seen more intelligent white people passed over in favor of deficient black people than any other racial discrepancy. I am simply arguing for equality, nothing more, nothing less. Treat everyone as equal regardless of the color of that person's skin. I am arguing that any program that attempts to make reparations by allowing less-qualified black people advantages over better-qualified white people is a seriously flawed program and is only furthering the cause of racism and inequality. Is that so wrong?

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    13. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college in the late 80's, the Black Student Union would, once a week, all wear their T-shirts for the organization that said in large letters, "Black is Right."

      How long do you think I would have lasted before I was expelled if I wore a shirt that said "White is Right"?

    14. Re:Racism, pure and simple by sabinm · · Score: 1

      There is a United White College Fund. It's called Alumni. It's called Daughters of the American Revolution. It's called the Masons. Oh, those aren't programs to help whites? Just because it isn't in the charters doesn't mean that 99.9 percent of those programs go to white recipients.

      It's not racist to own up to mistakes of the past. I'm not talking about reparations, I'm talking about starting out on even footing. The truth is anyone who whines about being white middle class male has got some pretty big blinders on. If you can't make money being from a white middle class family and you're a male, then something's wrong with you.

      More white middle class males go to college than any other group period.

      More white middle class males make six figure salaries than any other group period.

      If you're a white middle class male, you aren't likely to get pulled over for driving a fancy car or a car with out of state plates.

      If you're name is Phillip or Jonathan and not Rahsaan or Jamaal, your name will not be ignored in a list of applications.

      If you have an American accent (read white mid western) you already have someone on the other end of the phone who believes you.

      I'm not saying that things are so much better than they were even twenty years ago for minorities in this country. I'm not even saying that anyone owes anyone else anything. It's just time to own up to realities that the white male in america is far from being endangered . Just ask any state legislature. Just ask the united states senate. Just ask any CEO. Who is in charge?

      Don't panic anytime others want a piece of the prosperity that was unjustly denied for so long. That includes Blacks, Women, Gays, Latinos, Disabled persons and so on. Where I'm from we don't say 'I screwed up, get over it' We say 'I made a mistake, what can I do to make it better?'

      That doesn't mean money. That means when Jamaal wants an interview, treat him the same as Walter. When Sally gets assertive about that top broker position at Smith and Barney, she's not an ice queen or a bitch, she's competition. That means that a latino or a black shouldn't have to dress up in sunday best to go shopping just to reduce the chance of being survielled or to increase the chance of being waited on. It means all those things. It means when someone says or does something demeaning to another person that we don't quietly turn away or excuse their behavior. We can understand them, we can empathise with their frustration and feelings, but we can't let them get away with thinking that hatred or discrimination is socially acceptable.

      On one point I think we can agree. No need to defend gangters. There are other worthwhile causes to support that don't involve feeling sorry for people who commit drive-bys and gang rapes.

      --
      http://cincyboys.blogspot.com/ Everything Cincinnati. Including the word 'Finnih'
    15. Re:Racism, pure and simple by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I find ironic is that the black community is fighting itself on this. Who are the most high-profile gangsters? Black people. Well, besides italians, aka "the mob", although the general consensus seems to be that organized crime is not all that skillful, except those which have gone mostly legit, AKA running gambling. Of course now the Indians - er, excuse me, Native Americans - are starting to cut into that action. This is amusing because at least out here in Californy, Native Americans are known to be heavily involved in gun running. When are we going to get a bunch of pissed off Natives in a GTA game?

      Anyway you have black rappers "keeping it real" about how they live or lived a life of mayhem in the hood while those groups who are supposed to be speaking in defense of their people bitch about how an unfair picture is being painted. It's pure bullshit, plain and simple, bullshit on the same scale as whatever hispanic organization it was that was bitching about Taco Bell's chihuahua mascot being named "dinky" because they felt it portrayed Mexicans as being short - which they are. Well, not me, but I'm only a quarter Mexican, I'm mostly German so it doesn't apply to me. Nonetheless I live in California, where there are lots of Mexicans, and I have yet to meet one taller than I am. Granted I'm 6'7" but I think you get the point.

      The fact is that there are practicaly innumerable black people proud of their supposed criminal nature, so these "anti-racism" groups should just get over themselves to a certain degree. They should be out there fighting real racism.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Detritus · · Score: 1
      have you ever heard of a "no white man" policy at a country club?

      Yes, in Hawaii.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    17. Re:Racism, pure and simple by ALeavitt · · Score: 1

      Firstly, how far in the past does something need to be before we can say, "I'm sorry, I made a mistake, but it's in the past"? I notice that we don't hear many people apologizing for forcibly relocating Chinese people to work on the railroads in the 1800s, or Japanese internment camps during the 1940s. That doesn't mean that these things have been forgotten, it means that America, as a society, has made what reparations it can and wants to move forward rather than continuing to look backward. Or maybe it's because people of Chinese and Japanese descent have been doing better on the whole, economically and educationally, than African-Americans.
      Also, you argue that we should treat Jamaal the same as Walter. That doesn't mean affirmative action, that doesn't mean hiring him to maintain some ridiculous racial quota, that means treating him the same. That means that if Jamaal is more qualified than Walter, Jamaal should be hired, and vice versa. That is what equality means, no more, no less. Equality means that no matter what happened in the past, people are treated as equals now, without attempts to rectify the past by oppressing the former oppressors.
      Is it right to gain civil rights by infringing on someone else's? Is it right that I have to suffer for mistakes made nearly 150 years ago, mistakes that I had nothing to do with, mistakes that my ancestors had nothing to do with? I am arguing against racial discrimination, one way or the other. Racism works both ways, and you are arguing the cause of racism.

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    18. Re:Racism, pure and simple by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Fuck you. America is a country of immigrants, in case you haven't noticed. People said the exact same things about the immigrants who came here years ago, and those are the same people who you consider to be AMERICANS (the capitals show emphasis, obviously). And if you've never had to try to learn a completely different language through immersion (at an age where you're while past being able to learn through immersion!), don't criticize others for not doing it. It's incredibly difficult, and even moreso if you have duties like supporting a family as well.

  15. negative racial overtones by sporty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the many things to reduce prejiduce and dispell stereotypes, is positive exposure.

    For instance, the entire "nerd" stereotype. I'm sure there are quite a few nerds here. Heck, by the base definition of just beign smart, I'm a nerd. It doesn't mean that I'm phsically uncoordinated or have a severe inability to interact with people. I don't get sick very often, except when I'm unusally stressed. Never had a bad case of acne. A lot of people follow this line of life. But through exposure, we know that acne + social flaws + uncoordinated isn't tied to being smart.

    Another example, the entire cold war "Russians are backwards" stereotype. The biggest thing that's different between Russians and Americans are where they live, the languages spoken and small cultural things. These differences exist between any two cultures to varying degrees. But via exposure, we learn that a lot of thinsg aren't true because we see for ourselevs.

    By showing various races in negative stereotypes only reinforces certain ideas. Eventually, one deems for current fact either what isn't fact or isn't even current just because the idea was presented to them, not from some random joe on the street, but a coorporation.

    Frankly, I would expect an american company, to have learned from its past and not promote these types of stupidity. In a way, it's disrespectful for what most of us have stood up against. Worse yet, it's plain wrong in that it gives "black", "latino", and any other races that get depicted in this fasion. After all, isn't America supposed to be about equality of people and power? Isn't this just plain slanderous of an entire group of people who will now be seen more as thieves and other assorted criminals? We dont' want to put criminals in power, but minorities should be ok, yet we slight them in this way? Shame on you GTA producers.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:negative racial overtones by iainl · · Score: 1

      The game is centred around gang warfare. Specifically, rival gangs in a thinly-veiled reconstruction of South-Central Los Angeles, 1991.

      Given that the main characters will be male youths in gangs, what percentage of minorities would be acceptable? 0%? 7% (to reflect the national average population)? Or shall we reflect the facts?

      Rockstar take as their inspiration (across the entire GTA series) the many and varied classic films about criminal life.

      Shall we also ban Goodfellas, The Godfather and Scarface for their negative depictions of Italian-Americans? Boyz N The Hood for racism?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:negative racial overtones by sporty · · Score: 1
      Movies are quite different and you know that. Actors are what drive the industry. If minorities were only used as criminals, yes, ban them. But we know that's not true. I can easily name movies that had black people, white people and every other type in the position of violence. It is more equal than video games.


      In comics, video games and the likes, they are made up. Rather than reflect the facts, which aren't healthy, why not either do something more equal or not at all? Yes, you can be sarcastic if you want and have that whole, everyone represented in one gang with one-of-each BS. Moving away from stereotypes is all that I ask. It doesn't have to be completely mixed each and every time, but c'mmon...

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:negative racial overtones by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Frankly, I would expect an american company, to have learned from its past and not promote these types of stupidity. In a way, it's disrespectful for what most of us have stood up against. Worse yet, it's plain wrong in that it gives "black", "latino", and any other races that get depicted in this fasion. After all, isn't America supposed to be about equality of people and power? Isn't this just plain slanderous of an entire group of people who will now be seen more as thieves and other assorted criminals? We dont' want to put criminals in power, but minorities should be ok, yet we slight them in this way? Shame on you GTA producers.

      The simple fact is that the basis for the entire game is centered around the "gangsta-rap-culture" movies produced in the late 80s and throughout the 90s. Most of these movies obtained their direction (especially in the form of writing, acting, etc) from the very people that are supposedly being slandered by this game.

      People like to talk about the music and movie industries taking advantage of people, but in the end, "gangsta" rappers were among the first people to take control over their own careers by creating their own record labels and taking on most of the production positions normally filled by whoever the record label feels like putting in the studio. The primary reason they did this, of course, was that labels wouldn't touch their music until the early 90s unless there was someone else to take the heat for the language and portrayal of violence. Once the music became popular, of course, the movie deals came, and in many cases the artists exerted similar (though not to the same extent, due to the difference in the type of knowledge required) control.

      Now we have someone making a game based around the image that these movies and music portrayed, much like their previous GTA title was based heavily on the image portrayed by a combination of Miami Vice, Scarface, and other movies and TV shows portraying cops and gangsters in the 80s. This particular game company has learned that taking essentially the same game (GTA3) and putting period elements on it makes it more appealing to the demographic that is supposed to be mature enough to play these games in the first place (after all, what do people born after 1985 really have to feel nostalgic about from the 80s, or really remember about the explosion of "gangsta rap" in the late 80s and early 90s?).

      Then again, if it were simply another white or Italian protagonist, we'd only be hearing about the violence itself, unless some gang in the game was named after their race.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    4. Re:negative racial overtones by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Movies are quite different and you know that. Actors are what drive the industry. If minorities were only used as criminals, yes, ban them. But we know that's not true. I can easily name movies that had black people, white people and every other type in the position of violence. It is more equal than video games.

      But can you name any movies that portrayed life in South-Central L.A., especially relating to gangs, from the late 80s through the early 90s, that does not portray the majority of the people in that area (or even just the majority of the gang members) as black or latino? It's hard to say that movies are quite different when the game derives heavily from the movies themselves for it's backdrop. If someone never saw Scarface or Miami Vice before playing Vice City, I could understand if they didn't pick up on where the game drew its influence, and its entire world, but that doesn't excuse them from their ignorance if they believe its an accurate portrayal of life in Florida in the early to mid 80s. The same should only be held for GTA San Andreas, but because the movies they drew from for the early 90s L.A setting were primarily depicting the "plight of the urban minority youth", of course we're going to end up with a game that's heavily filled with urban minority youth behaving violently.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:negative racial overtones by iainl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Movies are quite different and you know that. Actors are what drive the industry. If minorities were only used as criminals, yes, ban them."

      This quote actually cuts to the heart of what I think is really going on here, both with your own posts and the article.

      Yes, it is true that the majority of black characters in this game will be portrayed as criminals, or otherwise negatively. However, with computer games about committing criminal acts in a semi-realistic setting, even if (as with the previous GTA games) they provide broad swathes of social satire and in-jokery to counter the severity of the violence, there aren't any positive role models around.

      The cynical, satirical world of GTA is populated by criminal mobs, corrupt law enforcement, a gung-ho military with little regard for bystanders and hypocritical politicians. There truly aren't any innocents or decent people out there in these games. So either you admit that each and every section of society is going to be ridiculed somewhere, or you insist that the game is a digital apartheid.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    6. Re:negative racial overtones by justkarl · · Score: 1

      after all, what do people born after 1985 really have to feel nostalgic about from the 80s, or really remember about the explosion of "gangsta rap" in the late 80s and early 90s?

      Please tell me you weren't born in '85.
      This all reminds me of a previous discussion about GTA(sorry, no link) where I related a story about how I was in the game store, and overheard a mother talking to the clerk about how it was better that she buy her 12 year old GTA3 than let him watch cable. "I mean, there's just so much violence, he dosen't need to be exposed to that." I was truly sickened.
      Granted, today's discussion is not about age and maturity, however, I think that with age and maturity, satirical racism can be taken with a grain of salt, and that some people are just too damn young for that kind of media. I can't stress enough that age limits need to be enforced because of issues like these. I could go on forever about this, but I'll dismount my soapbox.

    7. Re:negative racial overtones by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Where do people get off thinking they are smarter then everyone else? I hate that. So you are able to see that it's a video game, and, oh my god, not real life?! Only you are capable of determining that having acne and glasses doesn't make you smart? Only you are capable of relizing that there could be evil commies in another country who just want to get food, have some sex, and live their lives, and don't care about politics? Only you? Because, if this game shows me that black people are evil criminals, only you are capable of seeing the truth. The unwashed masses are too stupid to understand that it's a video game and not real.

      By the way, has anybody played this game yet? I mean at liest wait until the fucking game is released before everyone starts bitching. I told all my friends "I cant wait for it, cause the lead guy is black, there's going to be a shitload of people crying racist". Here's the first one.

      Can we repeate after me everybody... video game. V I D E O G A M E. It's realistic you say? It is? YEah, I get loading screens when I drive over bridges in real life. I also see cops ramming the crap out of guys car jacking other people all the time. He usually blows up in an inferno and gets up later.

      I mean, damn, I've playd racing sims, flight sims, sub sims, destroyer sims, pt boat sims and got knows whatever else sims. Those are wayyyyyyyyyyy more realistic then gta could ever be, and you kno what? I still know I can't drive an f1 car, or man a sub.

      IT IS A GAME. The characters are going to be made to be a stereo in order to be over the top, on purpose.

      What's with you people? Everytime I decide to to shade a character black, I have to make him a super intelligent guy? I created the character, I can make him however I want. If you don't like it, don't buy the game.

      Well whatever, I'm too stupid to know that the character in the video game isn't how every person who's black is going to behave.

      Why can't I associate gang like behavior in low income inner city house with, gang behavior in low income inner city housing? Why do I have to think that every black person I see is that way? What the hell? There's plenty of white people who act that same way who live in the same situation.

      Whatever, I don't care, I'm just feeding the trolls and the article trolls. Fucking video game that's not out. Trolls to the max.

    8. Re:negative racial overtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Rather than reflect the facts, which aren't healthy, why not either do something more equal or not at all?

      This is the single most insane thing I have ever read. You're suggesting actively hiding the truth because the truth isn't healthy?! Perhaps we should only hear goodfacts, since realfacts can only cause harm. Won't someone please think of the children?

      (Apologies for the Babylon 5 reference.)

    9. Re:negative racial overtones by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you weren't born in '85.

      '78, and personally most of the 80s crap still doesn't do much for me. '85 was a convenient year because it puts people born in that year near 17 when GTA VC was released for the PS2.

      This all reminds me of a previous discussion about GTA(sorry, no link) where I related a story about how I was in the game store, and overheard a mother talking to the clerk about how it was better that she buy her 12 year old GTA3 than let him watch cable. "I mean, there's just so much violence, he dosen't need to be exposed to that." I was truly sickened.

      I would be, as well. On the other hand, if her 12 year old was mature enough and she was aware of the content of what she was buying, it'd be a different story. The justification of violence already being on cable (or moreso on the evening news) is no justification at all.

      Granted, today's discussion is not about age and maturity, however, I think that with age and maturity, satirical racism can be taken with a grain of salt, and that some people are just too damn young for that kind of media. I can't stress enough that age limits need to be enforced because of issues like these. I could go on forever about this, but I'll dismount my soapbox.

      I completely agree, and I also agree with one of the people quoted (or perhaps it was the author, I'm not looking at it directly at the moment) in the article as saying "I dont want my 11 year old exposed to this." I was playing Doom when it came out, and a little math will tell you I was in high school at the time (and that just barely if I remember Doom's release year correctly as 92). However, the computer was kept in the family room, and my parents were quite aware of what I was playing. Just as with anything they could control access to (obviously to some degree I was exposed to things when they were not around), they made the determination that I could handle it before allowing me to play it (or view it, as in the case of most of the movies I was watching at that age). I tended to be exposed to a lot of things at an age lower than that recommended by the rating, but it wasn't due to lack of attention to the content. Knowing this, I also know that every child is different, and therefore what they should be exposed to is also different. I hope that my child will be mature enough to handle GTA: San Andreas before she is 17 (though she may never care to play it in the first place), but if I don't believe she is, I will certainly prevent her from playing it when I can, despite the fact that there's little doubt it will be in my house (and yes, I am prepared to keep much of my video game and DVD collection under lock and key, if only to keep her from playing with them as an infant in the near future).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    10. Re:negative racial overtones by jadenyk · · Score: 1
      Do me a favor - send me a link where you made a comment along the same lines when GTA Vice City came out.

      What? No link? How about GTA 3? 2? 1? No? hmmm... So what you're saying is that you're a COMPLETE FUCKING HYPOCRITE. Right?

      You have no problem when a video game shows a white man shooting people (so long as he's not shooting at black people right?) or even a fucking squirrel killing people, and you're cool with showing Some black sterotypes may be true, but as soon as there's a game that actually comes pretty damn close to the truth people start bitching... "Oh, it's racist..." "You're showing a black man killing - that's a stereotype.." No, it's the truth. Black people can kill. So can whites, and asians and puerto ricans and russians and anyone else. Please, just STFU!!!

    11. Re:negative racial overtones by vaporakula · · Score: 2, Informative
      Frankly, I would expect an american company, to have learned from its past and not promote these types of stupidity. .... Shame on you GTA producers.

      Hate to nitpick, but Rockstar North are the developers... and they're based in Scotland.

      Anyways - I believe your argument is flawed. It isn't the developer's fault that people are too weak to think for themselves, to look beyond a stereotype and make their mind up for themselves. Frankly, I'm appalled that you garner your world-view from things that corporations tell you.

      If people would choose to make up their own mind about things rather than have an opinion spoon fed to them, this world would be a much happier place.

    12. Re:negative racial overtones by sporty · · Score: 1

      I suggest you take a course in psychology, specifically group psych and race-and-ethnicity psychology. You'll find I touch upon those things. I'm also appauled that you assume I think that way. If the world was perfect and smart, you'll find these things laughable, but there are people who are of different opinions of you or i.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    13. Re:negative racial overtones by einTier · · Score: 1
      No, we'd probably be hearing about how the game is racist because you're using a white guy to inflict pain on downtrodden black citizens.

      And if we changed it so the citizens were white, we'd be racist for not putting black people in the game.

      And if we changed it so that it was a black guy killing downtrodden white citizens, we'd be racist because we're propagating the fear that all black people want to do is 'kill whitey'.

      Some days, you just can't win. That seems to be especially true when it comes to race.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    14. Re:negative racial overtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder, if this game was produced by Spike Lee, would these people still be bitching?

      Didn't think so.

      But y'all are probably still pissed about that Spike TV thing huh???

    15. Re:negative racial overtones by Cais · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I'm wrong (And I'm not), but isn't Rockstar North, the developers of the Grand Theft Auto series based in the UK?

    16. Re:negative racial overtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, I made that a bit late. oh well.

    17. Re:negative racial overtones by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Do you get this upset about Urban Music?

    18. Re:negative racial overtones by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Pull your head out of your ass. The game is based on movies that depict gang violence in South-Central LA, and those movies are in turn based on the REAL gang violence in South-Central LA. And guess what? The gangs in South-Central LA are largely black and latino.

      But hey, don't take my word for it. Do what I did a few weeks ago and take a drive through Compton, and see for yourself.

      These aren't just stereotypes; they're reality. Whining about "negative stereotypes" does absolutely nothing to change the reality.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    19. Re:negative racial overtones by sporty · · Score: 1
      Dear MsResistor. Go fuck yourself. Your friend, me!


      Frankly, we don't need to support living a shitty life style. I lived in thsoe types of conditions a long time ago. Yeah it's histoy, but we dont' need to advocate the behaviour.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    20. Re:negative racial overtones by iainl · · Score: 1

      Advocate?

      Sorry, I must have missed the part where Rockstar announced they were going to play up living in poverty as quality lifestyle choice. Was it while they were suggesting that the benefits include increasing your likelihood of being shot at, or is it the possibility of being mugged that appealed to you?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  16. Huh? by BigNumber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The game takes place in Southern California in the early 90s. This was the height of gang violence in that area and most gangs were made up of blacks or hispanics. I'm sure there were plenty of white people committing crimes at the time but that's not the subject matter of this particular game. Screaming racism in the face of documented history is just silly.

    1. Re:Huh? by mausmalone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of which, I wonder what the actual plot of the game is. Like in GTA3, the game overall was a quest for revenge, and as a sort of nomadic hired-gun, you were able to see how ridiculous the whole racial-gang/revenge thing was. It just led to more killing and extinction. I wonder if since 90's LA had so much racial tension, is this plot gonna have a moral about racism and violence?

      Seriously, I can understand being offended by all this, but when you look at the GTA series you have to remember that a lot of the stereotyping and villainy is done on an exaggerated scale to highlight the absurity of it all.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    2. Re:Huh? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      off the top of my head, IIRC, it's about a guy who gets out of jail, and wants to clean himself up, but fails and gets back into a life of crime or something.

      but i'm not trying too hard to figure out what the plot is until i get my claws on a copy of that game... ;)

  17. Let's ALL be offended while we're at it! by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I'm offended that caucasian game developers who implement villainous characters of other races are often stereotyped as racist bigots. What are they going to do about THAT, huh?? Oh, that's right; nothing. Because my great, great, great grandparants, who have been dead for 100 friggin' years weren't slaves! How many people own slaves here in America today? Isn't about time that we GET THE HELL OVER IT?

    I looked at a few screenshots of the game in question, and I can't think of a single, high-crime neighborhood that I've been in that didn't look EXACTLY like that. Please excuse Rockstar Games for making their game realistic.

    --
    But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    1. Re:Let's ALL be offended while we're at it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with part of your response, but your comment "Isn't about time that we GET THE HELL OVER IT?" is kind of simplistic.
      The problem isnt about slavery ending in 1865 its the years after that up until 1965 or so where african americans (like me) were treated like shit, second class citizens or worse. I hate to think that if I was born a generation or two earlier no matter how smart I was or how good I was I would have been treated like crap for no other reason except for the color of my skin. Thats why we have the problems of today its only been about 35 years where we were started to be treated decscently, maybe in 50 years we wont have to worry about getting over it. No offense and no disrespect but you really dont have a frame of reference to truly understand.

    2. Re:Let's ALL be offended while we're at it! by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 1

      No offense and no disrespect but you really dont have a frame of reference to truly understand.

      Exactly! How many of the people who are having such an issue with this today do have a frame of reference? A great many of them were never around when these things happened (including the problems you mentioned up to the 60's).

      "African Americans (like me) were treated like shit".

      I don't know how old you are, but were you actually born yet when all of this was taking place? Maybe you were, maybe not. But many people who weren't there to experience these things are identifying themselves with a previous generation who had, regardless of their present circumstances. This just continues to add fuel to a fire that really serves little to no purpose these days.

      --
      But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    3. Re:Let's ALL be offended while we're at it! by rpillala · · Score: 1

      There's no way to get over it until people can't just passively enjoy the benefits of racism. By doing nothing, some people still have racial advantages over others. Maybe you've never been on the receiving end of racism.

      I'm sure you've been in neighborhoods with a lot of drug abuse and non-street crime and you just didn't know it.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  18. dude... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Redneck" is not the preferred nomenclature. "Southern-US American", please.

    1. Re:dude... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      "Redneck" is not the preferred nomenclature. "Southern-US American", please.

      I'll be good god damned if there aren't also rednecks born in Washington state. Dunno about Alaska.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:dude... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      ok then... how about "Urban-Challenged American"?

    3. Re:dude... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Truck-friendly American?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:dude... by thebagel · · Score: 1

      I always liked "Royal Order of the Scarlet Nape."

      (And not all Southerners are rednecks, just as all rednecks are not Southerners.)

    5. Re:dude... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Pfff.... if any group should complain about being in video games in a demeaning fashion, native americans should be the first.

    6. Re:dude... by allanj · · Score: 1

      I like "Geographically challenged" a lot better...

      --
      Black holes are where God divided by zero
  19. USofAns by hummassa · · Score: 0, Troll

    are vastly more affected because they don't really mingle (as a rule, with exceptions).

    Point in case: me.

    My grand-grandparents are of the following origins: Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, South American Native, Black, Middle Eastern (Nobody [currently alive] knows if she was Jew or Arab), and Oriental.

    How can I be a bigot? Whatever your race is, I certainly can feel related. Many Brazilians are in the same condition as I am, maybe I am more conscious (having done some extensive genealogic research) of my multi-ethnicity. When filling forms with "race/ethnicity", I usually seek for the "all of the above" option... :-)

    But USofAns, more than European people, apparently segregate much more deeply, by race, by religion, etc. They don't seem to intermarry as commonly as down here.

    What appalled me in your link was the fact that this woman *is* in fact intermarried with a white guy and she fears and have nightmares with black folks. This is a sign IMHO that *she* has serious problems.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:USofAns by kisrael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What appalled me in your link was the fact that this woman *is* in fact intermarried with a white guy and she fears and have nightmares with black folks. This is a sign IMHO that *she* has serious problems.

      Ok, this could get ugly quick, but:
      Right now, there is a correlation with young black people and a violent, not-very-educated street culture. There are violent, undeucated people of all colors, of course, and you're doing yourself and the culture at large a disservice if you "profile" someone exclusively on skin tone, and there are tons of historical reasons why that subset of black culture exists and is such a noticable cultural force, but what she's getting at is it's sometimes hard to get in a reasonable conversation about the kind of phenomenon with the term "RACIST!" being slung around and shutting down productive conversation.

      The fact is, given some reasonable definitions of racism, most people are racist to greater or less degrees: often concerned about the well-being of their subset social group (like, heh, Geeks on slashdot...), and also using a variety of visual and audio cues to make at least a first best guess about what that person is all about. (and like in the case of a bunch urban-looking youths or redneck-looking bikers, if they're likely to be some kind of threat.) Really worrisome racism is when people can't get past their subgroup concerns and first impressions and preconceived notions; to damn everyone who has any twinges of that feeling is not helpful.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:USofAns by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm going to take things out of order a bit, because the points are somewhat separated...

      How can I be a bigot? Whatever your race is, I certainly can feel related. Many Brazilians are in the same condition as I am, maybe I am more conscious (having done some extensive genealogic research) of my multi-ethnicity. When filling forms with "race/ethnicity", I usually seek for the "all of the above" option... :-)

      What appalled me in your link was the fact that this woman *is* in fact intermarried with a white guy and she fears and have nightmares with black folks. This is a sign IMHO that *she* has serious problems.


      The whole point of the piece was that people need to remember that racism isn't just a white problem, or homophobia isn't just a heterosexual problem, it's something that everyone needs to address. Additionally, just because you're black (or in your personal case, multi-ethnic) doesn't make you immune to being racist.

      But USofAns, more than European people, apparently segregate much more deeply, by race, by religion, etc. They don't seem to intermarry as commonly as down here.

      I really couldn't say, because I have never been to Europe. However, I would say that in the US the line seems to be much more along class lines than racial lines. Unfortunately, class and racial lines have a tendency to coincide to a large degree in the US. If you find that you're in a city in the US and the locals are primarily black or latino, there's a good chance that you're in an area where people make less money, and therefore in a lower-class neighborhood. If most of the people are white, you simply have to look at the size and maintenance of the homes to determine the class of the neighborhood, because there are white neighborhoods at all levels of the "class struggle".

      From my own experience, having lived both in California and Virginia (the latter having been the capital of the Confederacy), racial mixing (both in families and in neighborhoods) is actually more common in the south, where integration was actually forced into being in the last century, than in the west, where people generally don't consider segregation to be an issue (it's not that they believe segregation is ok, they simply don't believe, and many probably wouldn't, they'd have a problem if black or latino people moved into their neighborhoods). The lines are still drawn primarily by how much money you make on the west coast as they are in the south, but no one forced people to integrate along racial lines in California, therefore most of them never did.

      I grew up in a primarily white neighborhood in southern California, middle class (probably upper middle class now that housing prices have sky-rocketed), where the most common minority was latino, at roughly 5% (the white population being roughly 87%). When I moved to Virginia, sharing a place with a co-worker, we were literally the only white people on our block, and I'll admit that initially it made me nervous. However, I have to add that it wasn't just the fact that most of the people living around me were black that made me nervous, but it was also the fact that I could not possibly have found a place in southern California that was that cheap to live in without qualifying for government assistance (which is to say, living in welfare housing projects). This made me believe that I was living in what was probably a bad part of town, somewhere you might have to keep your car alarmed and possibly not leave your home unoccupied for too long, should someone decide to break in and either trash the place or steal all of your stuff.

      As I continued to live there, though, I realized that I was actually living in a lower-middle-class neighborhood and that housing was simply significantly cheaper anywhere in the state than it was in California. The people living around me primarily had jobs in similar areas (not computers, but working for similar companies; despite working as a software developer there are very few people tha

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:USofAns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that racism (and sexism, etc.) has a definition? Generally speaking, it is morally wrong to apply attributes of a group to an individual who happens to belong to that group. When the group is a certain sex, we call it sexism. When the group is a certain race, we call it racism.

      This definition allows us to discuss racism and sexism quite objectively, while acknowledging that as a group there are clear statistical biases towards certain types of behaviour.

      It's just a shame that hardly anyone involved in the debate understands the simple definition of the terms. Being concerned about the well-being of your social group as opposed to other social groups is not racism. Making preliminary judgements about people on incomplete information is not racism - but acting on those judgements, or refusing to change them in light of further information about the individual - is racism (assuming the judgement is made on the basis of the person's race).

      So yeah I agree with what you're saying, but I think you can say it more strongly - the things you mention are not instances of racism, and there is nothing wrong with them per se.

    4. Re:USofAns by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, since you are from So. Cal, but didn't mention LA- my guess i that you are from either the Valley, or more likely O.C.

      I'm from OC, and prior to moving away I had the exact same feeling that you did. Not so much that "black people were bad", but that if you lived in a neighborhood with black people, then you were obviously in a really bad neighborhood. And, a true "mexican neighborhood" (I.e., Santa Ana) was also something that should be avoided...other than making weekly runs to Townsend St. to pick up a bag of weed.

      So eventually I left OC and went into the Army and gasp! I ended up spending 3 years being one of only ~5 white guys in a platoon full of 55 black guys. That opened my eyes to a LOT of things. I would not have considered myself 'racist' in the past, just completely un-aware. Growing up in a fairly well-off neighborhood in Orange County can do that to you. Oh yeah...we had a black guy at our high school...but his dad was a professional athlete.

      I've moved on, and now I live in a city where the population is about 45% hispanic, 40% white, and a mix of everything else for the last 15%.

      My sister who still lives in the same area I grew up, never moved away. Now I consider her to be one of the most racist people I know. I look back and wonder..."was I as bad as she is?"

      Well the whole point of this is....some of those "middle class white neighborhoods" of Southern California can gives kids a very distorted view of the world. The real estate prices are so high- and the reality of the hispanic/black underclass so prevalent...that a lot of kids grow up surrounded only by whites (and of course Japanese/Chinese...) They're not raised to be prejudice, but it just becomes an outgrowth of their environment.

      Oh...and also, while I was in the Army I lived in Germany. While OC may just be racist 'by accident' (mostly financial) I found Germany to be an extremely overtly racist place. Going out to local parks/pools/restaurants with my friends (black) gave me a view of what the US must have been like in the 50's. My friends wouldn't be let into nightclubs because of a 'dresscode', or we would be told that the 'pool was closed now' (with tons of people in it). Or we would go to a restaurant and the waitress just would never come to our table to take our order. No...Europe is no wonderland of color-blind society.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    5. Re:USofAns by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, since you are from So. Cal, but didn't mention LA- my guess i that you are from either the Valley, or more likely O.C.

      There's this small town near the border called San Diego, 6th largest city in the US, few million people living in the surrounding counties. Now, in east county, there are a couple of cities that are extremely majority white, and a couple of cities that are primarily latino and black. Obviously, I lived in one of the majority white cities, and the middle-class/upper-middle class designation would probably clarify which for anyone that's actually familiar with the area (unless, of course, they assume that anything outside of La Jolla is lower class).

      I have to add, though, that black and Mexican (as opposed to the more general term latino, since a non-Mexican latino was quite rare) people were not so rare that you never knew any of them, but there's a far cry from knowing that 1 black guy in your high school to being 1 of the only 2 white guys on your block. You have no problem with the individuals, as you can treat them as individuals and it often doesn't change any part of your general view of racial stereotypes and so forth. Unfortunately, when you live in an area with a large "minority" population, you quickly learn that some of those stereotypes have a foundation (but of course aren't completely true), and that you should never assume they're true unless you have to make a life-or-death decision.

      The other thing I learned, of course, was that it's really hard to get good mexican food once you leave San Diego.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    6. Re:USofAns by Rayonic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > No...Europe is no wonderland of color-blind society.

      Indeed. European intellectuals used to balk at the "mixing of the races" in America. And then, suddenly around 1970, they turned around and started calling us racists.

      Europe today is still a hotbed of racism (and increasingly anti-Judaism).

    7. Re:USofAns by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      What appalled me in your link was the fact that this woman *is* in fact intermarried with a white guy and she fears and have nightmares with black folks. This is a sign IMHO that *she* has serious problems.

      And thus you prove her point.

      BTW, if you think you hold no prejudices, then you're lying to yourself.

      Rob

    8. Re:USofAns by Poseidon88 · · Score: 1
      Wow, that was one of the more insightful posts I've seen on Slashdot. Thanks for sharing your very relavent personal experiences.

      Oh...and also, while I was in the Army I lived in Germany. While OC may just be racist 'by accident' (mostly financial) I found Germany to be an extremely overtly racist place.

      My wife's father and step-mother are German-born, and both grew up during WW2. We were in the car with them the other day and some woman in the next lane cut someone off and nearly caused an accident. My wife's step mother's response? "She must be Chinese." Later on, she was talking about how she has all these friends from different cultural backgrounds and how wonderful it is that they get to experience each others' different customs. I think I still have lacerations on my tongue from biting so hard. It doesn't help that I'm 1/4 Chinese.

    9. Re:USofAns by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Later on, she was talking about how she has all these friends from different cultural backgrounds and how wonderful it is that they get to experience each others' different customs."

      It has been my experience that most people who talk like this are the ones most likely to have a bit of a racist streak in them. After all, they're pointing out the way they actually noticed the "different cultural backgrounds" of everybody.

    10. Re:USofAns by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "How can I be a bigot?"

      By making broad assumptions about a person or a group of people based on where they were born or where they live, such as:

      "USofAns are vastly more affected because they don't really mingle (as a rule, with exceptions)."

      Simply including the "with exceptions" qualifier doesn't make your assumptions less bigoted.

      "When filling forms with "race/ethnicity", I usually seek for the "all of the above" option... :-)"

      Personally, I simply don't answer. I am a citizen of the United States and of the state wherein I reside and fail to see why any more information than this is needed.

    11. Re:USofAns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Diego is the SEVENTH largest city in the US. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763098.html

    12. Re:USofAns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(and increasingly anti-Judaism)"

      Your source is?

      I mean, you're generalizing Europe; Europe isn't a country like the USA is, it is a continent. A recent study here where i live (NL) confirmed that people who follow the Islam culture are more discriminated than people who follow the Jew culture. In France, burka's and other clothes are subject to become illegal in school or even public. Wether that's anti-Islam is up to debate, but it for sure ain't anti-Judaism.

      It is my observation, as non-believer, that because of the recent clash between Islam and Christianity, a whole new "war" is started which isn't always obvious, rather blur: a war between 2 religions.

      Because of this, it ain't for sure only anti-Judaism. There is also anti-Islam tendancies, and it makes me wonder how these tendencies are in the USA.

      Anyway, this all ain't racism because it hasn't got anything to do with race. Check the definition of racism in your dictionary; how one is clothed (as christian, islam, krishna, jew, or whatever) doesn't got anything to do with race, for example. What we're discussing is discrimination based on religion. No clue how that is called using a shorter definition and the line of "racist" vs "discrimination based on religion" is sometimes thin (or a crossover) given the genocides of Milosovic, Hitler, and many others, but "discrimination based on religion" ain't called racism for sure because that's "discrimination based on race" and race != religion.

    13. Re:USofAns by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      San Diego is the SEVENTH largest city in the US

      Right on, my information was 14 years old rather than 4 years old. Maybe by now it's the 8th or 9th with the way the housing prices have moved in the last 4 years.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    14. Re:USofAns by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that wanting to experience different cultures makes you a racist? It doesn't take much to notice that if you were raised with different cultural ideals since if there weren't differences everyone would be the same. Noticing things about your surroundings is called being observant.

      In my experience, people who go out of there way to point out how others are probably racist are among the worst people you'll come across.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    15. Re:USofAns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, this war of civilizations isn't the result of any recent clash between Christian and Muslim nations; it has everything to do with Islam itself. If you have any questions, please take the time to read the Qur'an as well as the Sunnah and Hadith. Once you learn about concepts central to Islam such as dar al-Islam and dar al-harb, dhimmitude, hatred of the kufir (especially the Yahud), and Arab supremacy - then you begin to see why there is a conflict in the first place. It isn't something we invited upon ourselves - it is the nature of Islam.

      So please spare all of us your impotent moral relativism. Jew-hatred has been a part of European culture for hundreds of years, and now the unassimilated Muslim population of Europe is helping it make a come back. Also, throwing out imaginary discrimination against Muslims in the west is just dishonest. Whatever profiling they experience is entirely justified - if you don't do anything wrong, nothing to worry about.

    16. Re:USofAns by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Are you suggesting that wanting to experience different cultures makes you a racist?"

      No, I'm suggesting that flouting (what you believe to be) your exposure to different cultures is a pretty good indicator that you have some inherent race issues going on in your mind, of the "all black people are good at basketball" variety.

      "Noticing things about your surroundings is called being observant."

      Depends on how you interpret what you're observing. "I have friends with a different background/skin color" doesn't mean "I know about people who have a different background/skin color."

  20. Only in videogames... by trueneutral · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm just glad that movies and television don't have racial steriotypes. It's good to see that every other form of media has progressed beyond that.

  21. What's new? by TalMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The two latest GTA games have been filled with racial stereotypes. Japanese Yakuza, Chinese Triads, Columbian Drug Dealers. The game has been thriving on racial stereotypes since it hit the PS2, and Xbox. Doesn't matter if the lead character is black, white, chinese, or whatever. GTA3's character was technically Italian...not white. Another stereotype with the Italian Mafia. Granted, I don't know how often you're going to find multi-ethnical organized crime establishments. At least its not saying, all 'insert race here' are violent and prone to rebellion. Its more saying all Yakuza, Triad, and Columbian Drug Cartels are prone to violence and rebellion. Lets face it, organized crime exists to committ crime. Long story short, there's nothing new here.

    1. Re:What's new? by TalMaximus · · Score: 1

      One more thing...GTA3 also had a white organized crime unit composed of violent rednecks.

    2. Re:What's new? by iainl · · Score: 1

      They weren't really "rednecks" per se; more Michigan Militia types. A right pain they were, too, since after you've vaguely annoyed one of them they'll shoot anything in sight.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  22. you know... by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    as much as I personally detest the GTA games...

    "Art imitates Life."

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:you know... by superyooser · · Score: 1
      While that is true, a more important truth is that...

      Life imitates art.

      You say that art imitates life, but, in this case, as in so many others, it imitates only a small, extreme subsection of life in a few American urban areas where there is an unordinary level violence, crime, and hatred displayed on the streets. It flashes these realities into millions of suburban and rural homes around the world and can make them actually fun to think about. That's what so bad about these games.

      Art amplifies certain values and lifestyles, and, in our increasingly monoculturized, globalized world, the Big Media spreads that art from coast to coast and around the world. Art can spread negative ways of living to communities where that kind of living has not existed. Artists and game makers should be aware of the extreme lifestyle and culture that they choose to highlight. It may come back to bite them on the street one day.

  23. Put me in the game... by NIN1385 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is just getting out of hand, may I suggest to all these black people with sticks up their butts...WATCH THE CHAPPELLE SHOW! If your pissed off aqbout this, I would like to refer you to the following website, but you have probably already been there.


    Click Here

    If they dont want to be in the soon-to-be greatest video game ever then tell them they can't be in it anyway...because I am going to be in it. I mean c'mon, who wouldn't mind being this guy:
    True Gangsta

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  24. Is stereotyping taboo or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you were to derive meaning from the context it's used you might think that "stereotyping" means or implies "racism" automatically, when in fact it's just another word for "conceptualization," which is something all language-using, thinking humans must do for their finite brains to cope with an infinite world.

    If Australopithecus found a red bulb that smelled and tasted good, then saw another bulb of the same color and smell, it would eat it. Ergo, racial profiling. Seriously.

    The statistical reality is that the super majority of Grand Theft Auto crimes are committed by Black and Hispanic people. Apparently even suggesting this statistical fact is "stereotyping" and intrinsically racist, even lacking specific extrapolation. When a Black or Hispanic is portrayed as committing a crime "not unbeknownst to their race," as it were, the furor erupts - but why?

    I think the real reason for outcry is (and I don't say this with cruelty) embarassment, plain and simple. You see the same sort of shame from the Italian/Sicilian-American community over gangster portrayals, and from Americans over "ugly American" portrayals. But embarassing facts coming out in the open always causes shame. I don't see why reality should be ignored in order to assauge someone's feelings about their social status. There is absolutely nothing wrong, or even incorrect, about portraying "brown people" committing urban crimes, rioting, looting, etc. And since there is absolutely no indication in GTA4 that these "brown people" are representative of all others in all other cases, I don't see how this could be construed as racist by any but the embarrassed themselves.

    1. Re:Is stereotyping taboo or something? by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      You new to earth?

    2. Re:Is stereotyping taboo or something? by einTier · · Score: 1
      If Australopithecus found a red bulb that smelled and tasted good, then saw another bulb of the same color and smell, it would eat it. Ergo, racial profiling. Seriously.

      There's a better way to explain this. When we were still evolving, it was very difficult to tell what new things and experiences might kill you or otherwise be harmful to your health.

      So, if Australopithecus ate a red berry, and it made him sick, he might reason that it would be a good idea to avoid all red berries. In this sense, he might miss out on some really great things, like strawberries and raspberries, but he'd also avoid the really bad berries that would kill him. In an evolutionary sense, avoiding things that kill you mean that your genes get passed on, even if the downside is missing out on some pleasure.

      If you want to take it a step further, if Australopithecus meets a member of the Commoniwannalayyou tribe, and that member anally rapes him with a tree limb and very nearly kills him, he may rightfully avoid contact with that group, even though the other members of that tribe may be great guys. Even though he has no proof that the other guys are murderous anal-raping maniacs. It's just easier, and safer, to assume that they are.

      This extends to everything. Why do you avoid that dark alley at night? Because your experiences (either real, imagined, or vicarious) tell you that very bad things happen in dark alleys. You don't have to go down that alley to know that it's a fairly risky endeavour. Even though that alley might be safe, it's simply wiser (and safer) to take the long, lighted way around.

      Our racist beliefs is simply a holdover of millenia of evolution. We stereotype. It helps save us the mental overhead and risk of having to evaluate each and every situation for danger.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    3. Re:Is stereotyping taboo or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, that would be so deep if I was stoned and still in High School.

      For the rest of us, the complaint isn't about the fact that people are stereotyping in the first place, of course generalizations are inevitable. It's that it's an innaccurate stereotype which in a perfect society, wouldn't be perpetuated.

      If you don't believe it, look at all the posts in this thread with "the sad fact is, GTA's racial depictions are accurate to real life." So many people with incorrect, wildly-negative stereotypes have a real-world negative effect (and if you really don't think people learn from media, get a clue!).

      Not to mention, repeating stupid cliches is a little boorish.

  25. Quentin Tarentino? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whereas the movies that play up on those same racial steriotypes (the Godfather movies, Taxi Driver, Tarentino's body of work, etc) are considered to be the pinnacle of cinematic art?

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    1. Re:Quentin Tarentino? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Who the hell marked this offtopic? I'm pointing out that the exact same racial and violent themes, when used in movies instead of games, get critical acclaim and public praise as being the best works of their medium.

      Offtopic, my ass.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  26. Warriors, come out and playy! *clank clank* by British · · Score: 1

    Well to counter that isn't some company making a game based on the classic movie "The Warriors?" With the 800000 gang members in that, that was pretty diverse. Ranging from female gangs to baseball player mimes.

  27. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A liberal website like Slate accusing conservatives of something bad? Shocking.

    Most conservatives I know would prefer things be completely color blind (ie no affirmative action), while the liberals I know tend to believe skin color should play a role in school admissions, hiring, etc.

    1. Re:Amazing by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the article. It sounds a lot more accusative of the typical liberal than it does of the typical conservative.

      Rob

  28. How about ... by arhar · · Score: 1
  29. tired of stupid people by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    "including images of black youths committing and reveling in violent street crime."

    So if the "images" were of white people I guarantee you wouldn't see white people complaining and sueing. If they did they would be called racists. If the game takes place in a certain area of a city it doesn't make sense to have the images of people in the game when you are in that area be anything but what the race of the people are.

  30. All the anti-video game lawyers... by JExtine · · Score: 1

    ...are wet with anticipation for GTA: San Andreas to come out. Guess they couldn't even wait for it to be released before they started trying to bash it.

    1. Re:All the anti-video game lawyers... by Spleener12 · · Score: 1

      Precisely. If it's starting to get attention now, three months before its release, just think of how much bitching will be happening when it finally comes out.

  31. Speaking of race in games... by DragonPup · · Score: 1

    We better ask the Pandemic and the US Army to stop distributing/playing Full Spectrum Warrior because it features violent Arabs in a Middle Eastern country.

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
  32. non-karma-whoring article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The screen crackles with criminality as a gang of urban predators itch for a kill. The scene erupts into automatic-weapons fire in a drive-by nightmare of screaming car engines, senseless death and destruction set to a thumping rap soundtrack.

    The action is not part of a new film, but of a video game in development - the latest permutation of Grand Theft Auto, one of the most popular game series ever. Partly set in a city resembling gang-ridden stretches of Los Angeles of the 1990's, it features a digital cast of African-American and Hispanic men, some wearing braided hair and scarves over their faces and aiming Uzis from low-riding cars.

    The sense of place, peril and pigmentation evident in previews of the game, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, underscores what some critics consider a disturbing trend: popular video games that play on racial stereotypes, including images of black youths committing and reveling in violent street crime.

    "They are nothing more than pixilated minstrel shows," said Joe Morgan, a telecommunications executive in Manhattan who is black and is helping rear his girlfriend's 7-year-old son, who plays video games. Mr. Morgan argues that games like the Grand Theft Auto sequel, which was described glowingly and at length in a game magazine the boy recently brought home, are dangerously reinforcing stereotypes.

    "A lot of young people are unable to discern between reality and satirical depictions," he said. "It makes them very vulnerable."

    His complaint echoes a concern that many civil rights and other groups, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, have long raised about stereotyping in movies, and the detrimental impact it may have on racial understanding and relations.

    The issue, critics say, is not that the games' representation of racial and ethnic minorities is as blatantly threatening as the sort found at hate sites on the Web, where players are asked to gun down virtual black or Jewish characters. Rather, the racial and ethnic depictions and story lines are more subtle, and therefore, some say, more insidious.

    "It's not just the kinds of stereotyping people generally think of," said Eileen Espejo, a senior associate at Children Now, an advocacy group in Oakland, Calif., that has studied video games. "It is the kind of limiting what characters of color can do and cannot do in the games that sends a message to kids."

    Video game developers counter that no offense is intended. They say their games are simply parodies, or a reflection of a sort of "browning'' of popular culture that transcends race and sells to all in a marketplace captivated by hip-hop styles, themes and attitude.

    Several games scheduled for wide release this fall or early next year are notable for their portrayal of urban black culture:

    Def Jam Fight for NY, from Electronic Arts, a sort of "MTV Raps" meets "W.W.E. SmackDown!" in which mostly hip-hop-style characters (one with the voice of the rapper Snoop Dogg) slap, kick and pummel one another in locations like a 125th Street train station in Harlem.

    25 to Life, from Eidos Interactive, an "urban action game" set to a hip-hop soundtrack that allows gamers to play as police officers or criminals, and includes lots of images of young gun-toting black gangsters.

    Notorious: Die to Drive, described by its developer, Ubisoft, as featuring "gangsta-style car combat" with players seeking to "rule the streets of four West Coast neighborhoods." Ubisoft's Web site describes the payoff succinctly: "High-priced honeys, the finest bling, and millionaire cribs are just some of the rewards for the notorious few who can survive this most dangerous game. Once you go Notorious, there's no going back."

    The prominence of black characters in those story lines is all the more striking because of the narrow range of video games in which blacks have been present, if present at all, over the years. A 2001 study by Children Now, for example, found that of 1,500 video-game c

  33. Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I didn't know better, I'd think DMA or Rockstar or whoever makes the game was behind this. The first game sold on controversy (violence), the second one sold because everyone loved the first one, and the third one may sell on controversy over racism.

    If someone at a publisher cooked up a marketing campaign based on controversy, they'd be rich. Well, richer than they already were.

  34. Thye best way to fix it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add in white characters eating fried chicken and watermelon.

  35. Yeah Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm not a racist, but I do live in a major city and people have gotten shot and killed on my block, and I hate to say it, but it was black youths committing and reveling in violent street crime.

    People of all ethnic backgrounds murder people and commit violent crimes, but in American urban areas, the vast majority of these crimes are commited by african americans. I would have a problem if the stereotype didn't exsist in real life, but the fact is this is how it really is, and they are just drawing from it. Golly, people writing fiction based on fact, how shameful!

    You don't see people getting all miffed by the cops in GTA hanging out by the donut shops.

  36. Offtopic Controversy Thought by Thedalek · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, at some point, someone needs to make a game in which you play as a video game company constantly battling a never-ending hoarde of lawyers who thrive on nitpicking every detail of everything you do.

    "The buildings in your latest game are not wheelchair accessable. You've been sued."

    "The color of the sky in your latest game has been found to give 5% of the population mild headaches after 20 continuous hours of exposure. You've been sued."

    "Your latest game unjustly depicts people with red skin, sharp, pointy teeth, horns, and cloven hooves as sinister. You've been sued."

    Seriously, the only gaming company that seems to get in more hot water than Rockstar is Infinium Labs.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  37. EU racism by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Ok, my experience with Europe is not pan-European (Spain, Portugal, France, Autria) but, despite my looks -- slightly dark complexion, a mix of typical Italo-american and Arab, not very tall, dark hair, light brown eyes --, I was well treated in all of these countries, with no problem at all. And I lived in Spain for a year, but there I was at home -- almost every Spaniard guy I knew looked just like me :-)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:EU racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to Spain and wear a t-shirt with an Arabic phrase scrawled on the front and see what they really think of you.

  38. Racist? by Bizzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not racist, I got a color TV!

  39. This is just crazy... by cttforsale · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even Rockstar has other games wheres "whites" are the criminals. I haven't played other GTA games since I have a Nintendo gamecube, but Smuggler's run: Warzones depicts whitey having a field day break all manner of international law. No one cares about that!!!

  40. You might not be a redneck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you can use "nomenclature" correctly in a sentence.

  41. Make race selection an option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm sure this game has a nice GUI for selecting game options.
    Just add another pane with checkboxes for what race you want the
    gang members to be.

    1. Re:Make race selection an option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, then it's gonna look pretty stupid to have white or even asian gangmembers going around saying "nigga" or "son".

      Not possible. People need to stop being stupid. End of Whois.

  42. Four words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Kill all the Haitans.

  43. Redneck Rampage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Redneck Rampage? It was full of drunk whites and nobody complained.

  44. What?! by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
    Take that back white-devil! I am all about shooting dinosaurs with my bow and arrows.

    proudly,
    Turok

    --

    I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

  45. one good point and one flawed point by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    So we're supposed to ignore the last 4 GTA titles just because the one coming up will have a black character to represent the player?

    This is a valid point.

    And here I thought people were complaining because there weren't enough minorities in video games

    This, in my opinion, isn't a valid point. Instead of blacks and whites, let's make up a new racial group called the blues. Let's just say that the blues are unrepresented in computer games, and they complain about it. Then along comes a game developer that says, "Okay, we've just developed a game that has a 75% population of characters from the blue community! Enjoy!" and then produces this game, which, by the way, requires that all the blue characters need to eat babies in order to survive, and murder people from the pink community and grind them up into narcotics, which, as it happens, all blues are addicted to.

    Hopefully you see my point. Yes, it's a little reductio ad absurdum, but I think it's fair to say that a minority community is allowed a gripe if the majority of times they are presented in games, it's done in a negative way.

    That's not to say that I think GTA should be censored or altered or anything like that. I believe in freedom for artists. But, you can't discredit a legitimate gripe, even if it's best levelled not at Rockstar Games but at society as a whole.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:one good point and one flawed point by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Leave the FSCKING Smurfs alone!!!!!

    2. Re:one good point and one flawed point by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you see my point. Yes, it's a little reductio ad absurdum, but I think it's fair to say that a minority community is allowed a gripe if the majority of times they are presented in games, it's done in a negative way.

      I see your point, but it's really not addressing the game itself. After all, the game isn't based on some absurd depiction created by the game developers or the majority race; it's based on a depiction created by a small sub-culture of the minority race, primarily used to profit from the movie and music industries.

      On the other hand, if they were griping about the origins of the depiction (and I realize that some groups have been doing so) as well as the continuation of this depiction, than it is quite fair. Trying to portray it as something that Rockstar has created out of whole cloth, though, is either ignorance or deliberate misdirection, and I'm betting on the latter.

      As for the way they are presented the majority of times, it's simply not true that this is the way they are presented the majority of times, unless you completely eliminate sports games. The fact that they're so much more often represented in sports games is simply a matter of their own dominance in the actual sports (exceptions like hockey noted), as they represent a far larger percentage of the population in professional sports than they do in the country itself (and therefore a larger percentage of the population of video games than in the country itself). The representation of every race tends to be quite skewed in video games, but more often than not this tends to be caused by the very nature of established genres not representing the outside world. After all, the closest thing to a popular game in which people play the real world is probably the Sims, and those people couldn't even speak properly or do much of anything for themselves.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  46. black protagonist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot see chosing a black guy as protagonist as racist. You identify with the main character of a video game as it is you alternate ego. It is in my mind more a matter of presentation.

    GTA is a game about criminals, so i guess theres no problem with having criminals of al ethnicities in it. There would be a problem if one ethnicity would be portrayed as the "good guys" and another as the "bad guys".

  47. Haven't played GTA becuase of a cube? by sunami · · Score: 1

    that's no excuse! All the GTA games are out on PC, and as long as you don't have a four year old computer, you'll have no problem running them. They usually look better on PC than on your TV, when the settings are up at 1024x768x32+

    1. Re:Haven't played GTA becuase of a cube? by cttforsale · · Score: 1

      So it runs on Linux then? I don't pay for games (I get all my GC games gratis)