Slashdot Mirror


HardOCP Wins Against Infinium Labs

An anonymous reader writes "HardOCP has won a huge legal round against Infinium Labs. The WhereIsPhantom website has all the details, straight from the court dockets. There is a list of orders a mile long for Infinium Labs and owner Tim Roberts to comply with by Sept. 30th."

323 comments

  1. Poof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But where is phantom? Ohhhh.... gone like *poof* due to the /. effect. Awwww yeaahhhh

    1. Re:Poof by JofCoRe · · Score: 2, Informative
      --

      Place sig here.
    2. Re:Poof by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      Who cares where it is? That movie sucked anyway. F' George, his stupid "prequals", and the "Really Truly Director's Vision Cut" of the original three that are coming out on DVD next Tuesday.

      "Phantom Menace" my ass... more like "Meddeling Director Menace".

  2. 0 posts by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that website is as non-existant as the console.

    1. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, to be fair, I didn't expect this to show up on the front page of Slashdot either. We're just a two-bit operation over at Whereisphantom.com trying to bring the truth to light.

      It didn't make it to this article, but four employees quit yesterday from Infinium Labs for various reasons including a late paycheck. The Sarasota office is expected to close (the one with the $300,000 sign) and all operations move to Seattle. There'll be more tomorrow I promise. (And hopefully that'll include more bandwidth.)

    2. Re:0 posts by bluewee · · Score: 5, Informative

      This should be of intrest

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    3. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, now that there's some sort of legal precedence -- yeah, Phantom console...like as in vaporware, never-gonna-exist, poof, Dead on Arrival, WinFS-running, Duke Nukem Forever-playing kaput console. Let's hear it for Infinium Wait!!!

    4. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Coral, man! Here's your site coralized: www.wherisphantom.com.

      Well, as I type this, Coral isn't helping. Mebbe if next time the submitter coralizes you before the /.ing begins? Come on, cluster D! Do your thing!

    5. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you guys must know this already, but I was frickin' amazen when I saw several Phantom/Infinium ads running at CNN.com two days ago.

      For a few minutes, I had actually considered the possibility that they got their act together.

    6. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Sarasota. This sucks that they are moving to Seattle. While I heard their office is downtown I never actually went and checked it out.

      However it would have been neat to do so.

    7. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I live in Sarasota and I do have to say the sign is pretty cool. Also, if you really want to you can hop on their WiFi network, they must not think WAP is any good.

    8. Re:0 posts by miikrr · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should have included all of the previous Slashdot coverage of Infinium's and HardOCP's quarrells.

    9. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What $300,000 sign? Nothing on Google about it, and the whereisphantom.com site is down.

    10. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I found these pictures on the Infinium Labs Forums site:

      At Night

      In the Day

      Color changing signs cost $300k?

      Peace

    11. Re:0 posts by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While you have a point to be sure, I still haven't seen any proof of a console. When they actually start spitting them out I'll pay attention. Still won't buy one unless we find out they're easy to hack, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 5, Informative

      In my original submission, I spread the love around a bit. In all honesty, I'd rather be slashdotted to kingdom come and have the word get around, rather than have the site up and running and no one paying attention.

      Just be sure to come back later and visit. We've got over 200 articles covering the entire saga from beginning to end. The tale includes money trails, court intrigue, drugs, hackers and phreakers... you just can't make this stuff up.

    13. Re:0 posts by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually as far as I can see the phantom would be great for MMORPG players, they just pay their bill to the same company every month and don't need to juggle different companies.

      Furthermore it would avoid the ripoff factor of purchasing a game for $80 or whatever and then having to pay a monthly subscription, you could just download it.

    14. Re:0 posts by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Well, I think the Phantom has almost no chance of success, so I'd never get one, then again I don't really have any console (last one was an N64) I'm a PC gamer although I've done game development for the XBOX. Don't get me wrong, I think Phantom real enough and the intentions are there, I just think trying to bootstrap a console business from nothing is incredibly difficult. Maybe they can piggyback PC games development but IMHO it's gonna be nigh on impossible to get a business going and get developers onboard. It is a tough business to crack into.

    15. Re:0 posts by mcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Summary, Hard[OCP] is far from an impartial reporter in this, they finally get proof of a real phantom and dis it as much as they can for being exactly what Infinium have always said it was.

      Actually if you were following this early on, they were pretty reasonable at first, seeming to take a "we're curious to see what this company has to offer, but it's hard to get information" sort of tack. They didn't really get bitter and spiteful and start smashing machines with sledgehammers or anything until they started getting vitriolic legal threats from Infinium and public attacks on the Phantom website just for having done their jobs as reporters. I kind of have to say, I can't find this totally unreasonable.

      The "hatchet piece" on the CEO you mention was totally legitimate investigative reporting. Was it negative? Yes. But it was also accurate and supported by documentation.

    16. Re:0 posts by alatesystems · · Score: 0
      Still won't buy one unless we find out they're easy to hack, though.
      What's the fun in that? The real fun is in the discovery.

      I think the download thing would be neat, but I think this company SUCKS for messing with Kyle and for dragging this all out in court. I really wish I could get to those docs that are on the /.ed site. Even the coral cache isn't working.

      I wish someone would just arrest the owner of this company for fraud or something, and then maybe they can go and get Darl while their at it. Those Bastards.

      Chris
    17. Re:0 posts by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yep, good point but where's the margin? They need a *lot* of content to get shizzle. A lot of developers taking a big risk unless they can get PC titles running with almost no modifications (and of course Microsoft has thsir hooks into them for big bucks to run windows and they have a competing console).

    18. Re:0 posts by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      well, to be fair hardocp's conclusion on that article includes "Let me start off by once again reminding you that what you have seen here is not current generation technology by Infinium Labs. You can head over to their website to see what they are currently representing to the public. It now looks more like some of the bigger laptops on the market sans keyboard and screen. There is no doubt that it is certainly different than what we have shown you here."

      yes it's just a plastic box and a very early prototype.. but what was intresting that IL could gain substantial amounts of money by just showing a pc in a box to potential investors - and here we thought that .com years were over. seriously, they're pitching that they've got something unique and show proof of it by having a pc in a custom job case(money needed to ).

      though, it would be nice if IL could produce _some_ list of games available at launch... and display their slightly more unique technology parts(like the supposed downloader thingy).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    19. Re:0 posts by miikrr · · Score: 1

      I usually go to all the links provided in a story, especially ones that interest me the most.

    20. Re:0 posts by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      The article mentioned several key critical points that went back to their central theme on this company like it was a poorly poorly put together PC (don't see how myself, mobo connections and hotclue to keep stuff in place BFD) and raising millions on the basis of a PC prototype which of course is not the case, that's doubly disingenuous when you consider that the original complaint was that there was no hardware, and Infinium's plan all along was that they'd use PC technology.

      But this isn't really about that that PC article anyway.

    21. Re:0 posts by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      It wasn't all supported by documents, it had some documentation but the most damaging parts were speculation. Don't you realize that anyone could take your record and selectively present information rurrounded by conjecture to put you in the worst light possible? The worst part of the whole thing was that it was self fulfilling. An article like that at the wrong time could actually cause Infinium to fail. Building a console business is all about building confidence in your product, your momentum and the likelyhood of success. It takes time and it takes developers.

    22. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard[OCP]? You mean [H]ard|OCP? Just pointing out the mistake. ;)

    23. Re:0 posts by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The worst part of the whole thing was that it was self fulfilling. An article like that at the wrong time could actually cause Infinium to fail. Building a console business is all about building confidence in your product, your momentum and the likelyhood of success.


      The same thing can be said about a confidence game too.
    24. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      The site is back up... for the moment. The database had some troubles for some reason (gee, what could that be?) I'm working on getting mirrors up and have a backup plan just in case. Thanks for all the attention you've given us and allowing us to share the information we have so you can make informed choices down the line.

      There's more to this story. It's a tale of hackers, drugs, women, money, lawyers, broken promises and a dream of a system to deliver content to your house for $29.99 a month.

      Chris Campbell
      Editor-In-Chief
      Whereisphantom.com

    25. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      I worked with our ISP to keep it going as long as we could. In the end we had to suspend the site since it was starting to affect the other sites on that server. We'll be back to normal within 24 hours I suspect, if not sooner.

    26. Re:0 posts by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I think Phantom real enough and the intentions are there,"

      I hear you brother.

      BTW could I interest you in a USD34.99 coupon for Duke Nukem Forever? It's a once in a lifetime deal.

      j'king ;).

      --
    27. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Chris,

      Please just send me a free iPod directly in the mail. I do not wish to go to any websites and fill out forms.

      Thank you,
      AC

    28. Re:0 posts by neural69 · · Score: 1

      As the site's down, use the
      google cache

      I'm sure I'm not the only one to suggest this but I can't see the link posted...

    29. Re:0 posts by Zeriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was more interested in the fact that half the ports on the back weren't connected to anything inside the case. THAT seems like a scam job to me.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    30. Re:0 posts by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2, Funny

      "money trails, court intrigue, drugs, hackers and phreakers.."

      But no hookers? Boring.

      --
      Sig it.
    31. Re:0 posts by madprof · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Do you have friendly people to mirror with?

    32. Re:0 posts by DjMd · · Score: 1

      The funniest part is the fact that the "Cool color changing sign", give one board post "hope" that the console, will come out....

      Nope, just wasting money on glitz.

      --
      DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
    33. Re:0 posts by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "We're just a two-bit operation over at Whereisphantom.com trying to bring the truth to light."

      I'm watching the E3 footage from infinium, and there does seem to be a prototype, but I'm astounded by the amount they want; $29.99 for a minimum committment of two years comes out at $730, which is a hell of a thing and tends to suggest that they're trying to get behind a subscription model.

      So the question is, was this basically a repackaged PC in a nice box?

      Hmm...yes, the UI does look suspiciously 'flash', and his language is very evasive, not to mention that the games used are PC.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    34. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      Ding ding ding ding! Give that man a prize. HardOCP just has an article up examining the insides of an early prototype. Can you say ATX? I knew you could!

    35. Re:0 posts by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "Give that man a prize."

      :oP

      "HardOCP just has an article up examining the insides of an early prototype."

      The reason why I went for the E3 footage was to check out what Roberts was actually saying...early prototypes can sometimes be completely different to the finished model, but some of the things he was saying would have meant significant changes to the games themselves, such as the streaming downloads...that doesn't/didn't gel with the idea that a working prototype should still be in the stage where they didn't actually know *how* it would actually work.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    36. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't get me wrong, I think Phantom real enough and the intentions are there"

      You haven't paid a goddamn bit of attention to its development and origins, have you? Their "intentions" are clear.

    37. Re:0 posts by BigTunaCan · · Score: 1

      It doesn't mean much if it is "just a PC" at this stage. When I was first working on Tao Feng for the XBox our original "prototype" machines from Microsoft were pretty generic looking tower PCs with a cheap ass USB controller. It wasn't until well into development that we received the final development kit and received a development Xbox that looked like the end product (The final development Xboxes look the same as the home Xbox except they are in clear cases). Also, if anyone has actually followed what Infinium Labs is saying they are supposed to be a subscription model targeted at older casual gamers. So this isn't really anything new, it's just the set top box idea that is actually been pretty successful overseas. They have also stated that the Phanton will play many PC games. My guess is an enhanced PC that is intended to allowing downloading games on subscription while preventing piracy at the same time. Now don't get the wrong idea here and think I'm doing the 'hurrah' for Infinium. I believe that the management has done some shady dealings in the past and also that they have very little chance of succeeding in the market now even if they are legit. But I don't think they are as 'evil' as HardOCP is making them out to be either.

    38. Re:0 posts by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      " It doesn't mean much if it is "just a PC" at this stage."

      Seriously, go check out the footage. They appear to have a keyboard, mouse, controller and base unit that are 'complete' in terms that they look correct according to design. But the gameplay and menus were pure PC, and I still can't get my head around a supposed 'downstream' downloading system that allows for play while it's downloading. What I know doesn't gel entirely with what's been mentioned or claimed.

      "So this isn't really anything new, it's just the set top box idea that is actually been pretty successful overseas."

      I am overseas. FYI, the PSX 'home entertainment' unit has pretty much tanked in Japan, mainly because they're too close to announcing the PS3, and in the UK it's pretty much split between the Xbox, PS2 and the tail end of Gamecube sales.

      "they are supposed to be a subscription model targeted at older casual gamers."

      There's only one demographic that *could* actually subscribe to that, but everyone is going to consider it on merits and I doubt that they've done the market research that would allow them to gauge demand. Certainly the minimum subscription price is a *minimum*.

      "My guess is an enhanced PC that is intended to allowing downloading games on subscription while preventing piracy at the same time."

      And this is why it won't work.

      "But I don't think they are as 'evil' as HardOCP is making them out to be either."

      Me too, although it's not really a question of 'evil', but more coming good on claims. I have a very specific problem with claims being made that cannot be followed through, mainly because there do appear to be vast loopholes about saying such things with no evidence whatsoever. I have to say that 'Phantom' looks like a bust from both the business model point of view and the mismanagement of PR to the extent where they're suing a news outlet; the first thing you learn is not to sue someone who buys ink by the barrel.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  3. Whew, that must be a long list... by jgoeres · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So long it's taking FOREVER for the server to respond!

  4. That's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 2, Informative

    one of the hardest to read sites I've seen.
    They need to lose the fine horizontal lines.
    Or maybe I need to get my eyes tested...

    1. Re:That's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      one of the hardest to read sites I've seen.

      Obviously you haven't been to the IT section lately...

    2. Re:That's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 4, Funny

      I recognize that color.
      It's called *infants first crap*.

    3. Re:That's... by gatzke · · Score: 4, Informative


      You can get rid of it by removing the first part of the URL, like chage games.slashdot.org to slashdot.org.

      The following is from another comment to help you in mozilla automatically drop the it. or games. part:

      Create New bookmark.
      Label something useful - "/. it fix"
      In location insert this
      javascript:void(location.hostname = "slashdot.org");

    4. Re:That's... by Gurezaemon · · Score: 3, Informative


      Actually, infants' first crap (tm) is green / black. Meconium. Horrible stuff to clean up. It turns that attractive mustard color after a couple of days.
      </pedant>

    5. Re:That's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      you actually leave it there for a couple of days?

    6. Re:That's... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      'It' being the newer stuff, not the stuff you had trouble cleaning up, right?
      </pedant>

      Damn, why does SCO come to mind here?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    7. Re:That's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 5, Funny
      Ahh, a connoisseur of infant crap.
      I salute you sir!




      From a distance.

    8. Re:That's... by slittle · · Score: 1

      It's called "Baby Poo Yellow" and is often painted on pool floors (makes the water look bluer/greener or something, I forget).

      </useless info>

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    9. Re:That's... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...or maybe you should use the right tool for the job? Just install squidGuard, add a rewrite section as so:
      rew slashdot {
      s@it.slashdot.org@slashdot.org@
      log slashdot.log
      }
      and add it to your acl section. Then whenever your proxy encounters it.slashdot.org/blah, it's rewritten as slashdot.org/blah. You can obviously do this for any section, and you don't need to set up all your web browsers with an ugly javascript hack!
    10. Re:That's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look everybody! He misheard "Baby Pool Yellow"!
      HA-HA!

    11. Re:That's... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it.

      For those who don't know what we're talking about, here's some hard medical facts. They even have a picture of it, including the baby, for whatever reason.

      (Those who might be offended by babies, their excretia, or their body parts should avoid clicking the link.)

    12. Re:That's... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Damn. As a once-stuck-in-the-uterus fetus, I'm slightly disturbed by knowing that.

      I hate you all. :-P

    13. Re:That's... by gatzke · · Score: 1


      You are right. It would be a lot easier to configure squid, then configure squidguard, then get this little bit up and running, then make your browser use a proxy. Simple! I will just click on the "do all that stuff and make it work" button. Wait, I don't see that on my desktop.

      A simple bookmark is probably the best way for 90% of the people out there. For the rest, have fun getting it to work!

  5. In other news by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Infineon got smacked down for price fixing its chips.

    Not a good week for Infin*.

    Anyone got a link that works? The phantom site seems to have disappeared into thin air.

    1. Re:In other news by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0

      What chips? The company in the article "makes" consoles.

      You're thinking about the giant fine against RAM companies.

      I blame the drugs and rock and roll music.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:In other news by realdpk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drugs, like those that make you misunderstand the use of the * wildcard? :)

    3. Re:In other news by Gryll · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Did you notice how the parent said Infineon not Infinium?

      Infineon Price Fixing

      And then he used Infin*, if you read the post you would have got the mildly funny joke about bad luck for companies whose names start with INFIN.

    4. Re:In other news by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      While I see the * there myself, it still comes off as a mistype of what it really should have been to complete the joke; Infin%.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    5. Re:In other news by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if it was a SQL joke, it's clearly a shellscript/perl joke ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    6. Re:In other news by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Only if it was a SQL joke, it's clearly a shellscript/perl joke ;->

      The asterisk has two distinct meanings in Perl; as part of the globbing mechanism (where the joke would work) and *differently* (i.e. 0+ repetitions of the previous character/sequence) as part of a regular expression (in which case the joke *wouldn't* work).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:In other news by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      new Pedant().invoke();

      Drugs, like those that make you misunderstand the use of the * wildcard?

      The GGP used * properly as a wildcard. It wasn't being used as a Kleene closure operator, as used in regular expressions.

    8. Re:In other news by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Right. It'd have to be Infin.* in a regexp. Methink the OP was probably indicating fileglobbing, and nothing else, in which case it would work.

  6. WhereIsPhantom? by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you mean, "Where is website?"

    1. Re:WhereIsPhantom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get signal!!!

    2. Re:WhereIsPhantom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the same thing?

  7. In case it's slashdoted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    404 Not Found

    1. Re:In case it's slashdoted by servognome · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need more energy in your 404

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:In case it's slashdoted by Artifex · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oh, man, Homestar used to have a really cool 404 page with them walking/talking in front of an exploder-style 404 page. Looks like it's gone :(

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:In case it's slashdoted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean this?

    4. Re:In case it's slashdoted by Artifex · · Score: 1

      Yes! That's it exactly! That's the best error message since the haiku 404 error messages on BeOS' native browser. Okay, it's not a 404, but still...

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:In case it's slashdoted by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

      I believe you are looking for this:

      Hommestar funny 404

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  8. Can we just ignore infinium by goneutt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Infinium is a bit like a scab, if you pick at it it'll only get worse.

    Isn't this company/product the original vapor ware. Comments... Even the website is vapor.

    --
    Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    1. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Isn't this company/product the original vapor
      > ware. Comments... Even the website is vapor.

      Hmmm, the Infinium Labs website is actually very
      well done and professional so I don't know what
      you mean by a "vapor" website. But besides that,
      could someone explain what the uproar about this
      company is about? It seems the "slashdot"
      community has had a bug in it's ass about the
      company from day one. What gives? I don't know
      anything about this company but looking at its
      product literture it seems that they have a good
      idea and the latest incarnation of the product is
      actually pretty nice. So, someone please
      enlighten me.

    2. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right - Kyle did go out looking for this fight. Fucking whiner, and a piece of shit when it comes to integrity.

      Kyle, way to go. Now go fuck yourself.

    3. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by sahrss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Infinium are trying to pull off something very difficult from a business perspective and Hard[OCP] stuck the boot in..."

      What the hell? Where did you come from? Nice misinformation. Go read some of the evidence in these threads:

      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/27/ 1430211&tid=123&tid=127&tid=10
      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/04/ 0017209&tid=123&tid=127&tid=10

      -1 Troll. Mods, this guy made another comment here: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=122123&c id=10273433

    4. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, degenerative assnub.

    5. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

      Christ, do you work for Infinium or something? You've made three posts on this topic saying essentially the same thing.

      [H]ard|OCP may have written a rather unflattering piece about Infinium and their CEO, but you can hardly blame them if their claims are true. (They insist that they are. I personally have no clue. Can you actually debunk their claims?)

      And the only reason [H]ard|OCP sued Infinium is because Infinium kept threatening to sue them and demanding they take things off their website. But the [H]ard guys have enough confidence in their story that rather than enduring a constant barrage of legal threats they took the initiative and essentially sued Infinium just to keep Infinium from threatening to sue them.

      --

      Physics is good

    6. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Edit, typo; that should read "Kyle sued Infinium", not "Kyle sued HardOCP"

    7. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't work for Infinium, but I don't share your opinion. Just because HardOCP is a community site doesn't automatically earn them my support, I like to judge by the facts. The original article was a classic hatchet piece, it wasn't based entirely on facts, it was full of speculation and assumptions about the worst possible motives and. I'm not astroturfing, just posting where I think I can make corrections. I don't have a lot of sympatyh for HardOCP in this case, I think there are two sides in this case and everyone automatically landing in the HardOCP camp is their business, but excuse me if I sit on the sidelines on this one.

    8. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, HardOCP sued first instead of buckling under the threats and taking the piece of their website. They were being threatened with lawsuits and they sued to have a judgment made, ie: "You're threatening to sue us, well let's see if a judge thinks you have any ground to stand on."
      Isn't it odd: someone fighting back when a company threatens to sue them?

    9. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      a computer in a plastic case is hardly a 'prototype' for a service based gaming system.

      I don't think there was ever doubt about them being able to take off the shelf components and slap them inside a custom case. what there is doubt is if their (non showed) subscription based game loading thing is going to fly(and even then how on earth are they going to _make__money_).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by nursedave · · Score: 1
      You keep calling it a hatchet piece. It was not. As others have posted, and you keep ignoring for whatever lopsided reasons you may have, the first article wasn't that critical. Infinium got nasty, so HardOCP responded. Infinium threatened to sue, so HardOCP sued first to push the issue.

      Yes, they sued in texas. And why not? I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that Kyle is in Texas; Infinium certainly was at the time the suit was filed.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    11. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Dude, I don't care to persuade you that it was a hatchet piece, in my opinion it was. You pretend it was merely a factual representation but it was full of speculation and opinion, and read the worst into everything after starting out with an assumption. The irst article wasn't critical, are you on crack? I suggest you read it.

      You assume in your pro-HardOCP frenzy that I'm somehow anti-HardOCP. My remark on their suing in Texas was a neutral observation in response to a posters question, I know Kyle lives in Texas.

    12. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fight was worth it because Infinium is being run by a lying scam artist, and someone should take him to court and expose him as the fraud he is.

      The original article makes it obvious that Infinium had nothing when they said they had something -- the logical conclusion is that Infinium produced "prototypes" after Hard[OCP] blew apart the bullshit machine they'd built with some press releases.

      Sure, it's news that some scam artists failed to convince a court they weren't scam artists. Can we get back to news about real products, though?

    13. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by cynic10508 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't this company/product the original vapor ware.

      Well, they did send me a promise that they would release Duke Nukem Forever. It was handwritten in the blood of virgins. Strange how it smelled like ketchup though...

    14. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit you worthless motherfucker. Infinium and it's CEO have a history of ripping people off. What makes you think this "company" is going to be any different? Sorry, but I smelled a rat from day one and we called it like we see it bitch.

    15. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You a broken record and I don't understand why you are trying so hard unless you have some kind of hidden agenda here.

    16. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      You keep refering to this "hatchet piece" but I've not seen one. What I've seen is an expose of someone who has a pretty shady past. HardOCP did not claim that their piece was the final definiteive answer. In fact I remember them saying something to the effect that they can only conclude the worst. If this was a classic hatchet piece it would have been full of lies and made up "facts" a la Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. HardOCP is not guilty of this at all.

    17. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Performer+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sigh, in my opinion it was. It was full of speculation. As for thepolitics you should use the example of Dan Rather for made up facts, it'll have much more impact.

    18. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by nursedave · · Score: 4, Interesting
      First, I am not pro-hardOCP. I am just anti-stupid.

      Second, I am not pretending it was factual; it was factual. I did read the article, and I presume you have, too. Does it not bother you that the "company" received mail at a Mailboxes, ETC. type place for 8 months, after securing some $25 million in funding? That when they did claim to get an office, someone checked and it was vacant? Dude, all these things SCREAM scam; factor in the fact that the CEO has a history of such shadiness, and it was a vital piece serving the public interest, not a hatchet piece. I'd hope such activities would always be brought to the attention of people who might think of investing or purchasing something like this.

      Third, your remark on suing in Texas was hardly a neutral observation, you made your own assumptions, which you have the right to do, but please, don't call it neutral and insult our intelligence. And that remark didn't make sense anyway - Kyle lives in Texas, Infinium had a business presence in Texas - where the hell should Kyle have files suit? Alabama? I'm in Texas, and if I want to sue Cocacola, I'm doing it right here.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    19. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article wasn't trying to be unbiased or nice, however it also wasn't a hatchet piece imho. Sure it speculated however it didn't outright lie or make up facts, and that's probably why IL hated it: they couldn't respond to it. If facts weren't right then you can reply by pointing it out, and even if speculation is way off you can do the same however IL simply threatened to sue (needless to say if you can do the first two then you can probably sue as well, although sending an e-mail first is cheaper)..
      There are peaceful ways to try and resolve such things however IL didn't do either, it didn't try to clear up the mess but simply sent a threat (most likely assuming HardOCP would cave in). Hell, you can even ignore the editorial, and in all honesty after 4 months that's probably the best solution. It was simply a horrible PR move on ILs part, and now they're paying for it.
      And if anyone is wondering, if I remember correctly around the time the [H] editorial came out there was a lot of speculation about IL. Mostly it wasn't the good kind either, and Kyle, I guess, decided to use it to his advantage and look into IL. Whatever the final story was it would give him readers (hell, finding out the thing is legit may have given him more immediate publicity)..

    20. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      You're on the losing side of this fight, Performer Guy. I hope you're being well paid.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    21. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Disevidence · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Either a) You work for Infinium
      b) You're related to someone who works for them
      c) You're sleeping with someone who works their

      OCP basically reported facts, straight down the line, they didn't misrepresent anything (please point out where, in specific detail, they did?)

      You're the only one posting bullshit around here, mate.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    22. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      I agree with you that the article is rather unfair and can be accurately described as a hatchet piece (who among us _didn't_ work for some moderately or severely failed company in the late '90s, early 2000s? And especially the companies that ended up losing money well after he left them? Definitely not fair.). I will agree that this guy, as with many others I categorize as "marginal entrepreneurs", straddles the line between legitimate entrepreneur and shyster at times, but that's not terribly unusual. And clearly there was quite a bit of sketchiness and vapor factor associated with the Phantom console.


      Anyway, I still don't think that piece justifies any legal action, since despite being quite negative and filling with several unjustified suggestions, it doesn't say or do anything clearly illegal. I don't know if HardOCP sued Infinium preemptively? That also sounds over the top. But hey, more power to 'em, threatening legal action against journalists, even ones who have nasty things to say about you, is almost always a bad idea.

    23. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Uh when opportunity knocks don't complain about the noise.

      Since he actually believes the Phantom console is for real (despite hardly any evidence), maybe we should just try to sell him stuff instead? A bridge or two?

      Actually I think I'll try to sell him a coupon for Duke Nukem Forever (that famous video game).

      --
    24. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Where was the speculation? Warning potential investors to do due diligence is speculation? Examining evidence and reaching a logical conclusion is speculation?

      You've completely failed to be specific in your criticism. What about the original article is not factual or logically derived from the facts?

      I've never been a hardOCP reader, other than those articles about Infinium that have been linked on slashdot, so I have no interest either way. I do have a bias against con men who bilk others out of their money, and I'm beginning to wonder what your angle is.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    25. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by toriver · · Score: 1

      Anyhoo, people have since gotten their hands on physical Phantom console prototypes ... which are useless pieces of plastic because the server infrastructure isn't there.

      Infinium are trying to pull off something very difficult from a business perspective

      Promising the moon to fish money out of investors' pockets is apparently not as hard as you imply.

    26. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by joper90 · · Score: 1

      look stop being stupid and back up your argument with facts..

    27. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Please point out some clear examples of this speculation rather than constantly alluding to it, overwise you have nothing to debate about.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    28. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this company/product the original vapor ware.

      No.

    29. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Could someone explain what the uproar about this company is about? It seems the "slashdot"
      community has had a bug in it's ass about the
      company from day one. What gives? I don't know
      anything about this company but looking at its
      product literture it seems that they have a good
      idea and the latest incarnation of the product is
      actually pretty nice."


      [Comment saying infinium are pretty okay]

      [442 comments rebutting that one]

      [Comment saying infinium are pretty okay]

      [250 comments saying no they're frauds]

      and now you feel the need to reignite a flame war? C'mon, only one person needs to make the pretend-naive but hopelessly incorrect statements in each story, to give people a chance to explain the situation in replies to them

      Yes people here do sometimes react badly to those who use lawsuits to ensure that incorrect information continues to be spread unchallenged

  9. Text of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just in at the courthouse, an order regarding KB Network's Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions. Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the court finds that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. Read on for the details...

    Judge Kaplan has ordered Infinium Labs to prudce a series of documents by September 30th. These include:

    1) "Documents reflecting the identity and location of potential investors, venture capitalists, investors, partners, shareholders to whom private placement memorandums were provided, or other stake or equity holders in Infinium Labs who are located in the state of Texas other than shareholders that acquired Infinium stock on the public market, and the transactions, proposed or consummated with same."

    2) "Pleadings and final judgments from any Court of any Jurisdiction in which Timothy Roberts was or is a Defendant between the dates of August 1, 2001 and February 29, 2004; and; the 2003 Tax Return of Timothy Roberts when filed."

    3) "All documents in their possession, custody, or control that evidence, reflect, relate to financial transactions (including any beneficial transaction) between Infinium and Roberts from August 2002 to the present, including but not limited to printouts of all bank, credit card, and other financial transactions currently maintained in electronic form."

    4) "All emails sent or received by Infinium's Texas employees."

    5) "All year-to-date payroll information and records for 2003-2004 for all of Infinium's Texas employees.

    6) "All documents reviewed by Kevin Bachus in preparing the declaration submitted in support of Defendant's motion to dismiss that have not otherwise been produced."

    7) "All loan documents between Infinium and Roberts, including but not limited to documents pertaining to the $50,000 loan Roberts testified about in his deposition."

    8) "All archival data and all forum postings from Infinium's websites."

    9) "A complete and unaltered copy of the 'Who's We' agreement."

    10) "All Infinium board of directors minutes and resolutions, with the substance of the resolution redacted unless it pertains to Roberts. Defendants are also ordered to make unredacted copies of its board of directors minutes and resolutions available for inspection by Plaintiffs' counsel at the office of Defendants' counsel. Defendants shall make such documents available for inspection on or before September 30, 2004. If, after inspection, Plaintiffs believe that any redacted portions of these documents should be produced, they may seek appropriate relief from the court."

    11) "Plaintiffs' may re-depose Infinium and Roberts, with questioning at the second depositions limited to documents and information not produced to Plaintiffs prior to the first depositions. The combined duration of the first and second depositions shall not exceed seven hours per witness. Additionally, at the option of defendants, the depositions may proceed by telephone... . Plantiffs shall pay the costs of the second depositions and each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees. The second depositions shall be completed by November 5, 2004."

    Now, once you've digested all that you'll remember that the court also ruled against KB Networks in some parts. That is actually only one item which is: "Plantiffs' request for sanctions is denied."

    Analysis

    It appears that HardOCP came away with a large victory. Without the transcriptions from the first depositions, we can only speculate based on subsequent motions on what transpired that day. It's quite obvious that the focus is purely on Tim Roberts and following the extensive money trail that has resulted. Section Six is of interest since it's the only one dealing with Kevin Bachus. What did Bachus say (or not say) during his deposition that piqued the interest of Kyle's lawyers?

    We now have mention of a $50,000 loan that Roberts testified to in his deposition. What is the significance of this money? Further, will the production of emails, the old website and payroll be enough to prove Infinium can indeed be rightfully sued in Texas?

    1. Re:Text of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy if a competitor got ahold of all this information, they could crush Infinium. It sounds like a court order to do a very meticulous reporter's research for free. I hope this involves some guarantee of confidentiality for Infinium regardless of whether it's a good or bad company.

    2. Re:Text of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, you can be certain there is.

      If you follow the SCO cases then you see just how much stuff can be requested from the other party. For example, SCO got access to the source code for several operating systems, including AIX and Dynix for all released versions (although they were denined access to the entire VC histories for said products). There were details controlling who gained access to the files and under what cirumstances.

    3. Re:Text of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe IL will be crushed by it's owner. Roberts' history of failed ventures should have been any investors clue to keep their money in the bank. Although I'm pretty sure half of the investors knew the venture would fail and have anticipated some form of tax write off. ...staying tuned to find out what transpires...

    4. Re:Text of article by TexArcana2002 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      pwnt. Set, match, game to the [H].

  10. Copied from HardOCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://hardocp.com/

    HardOCP Vs. Infinium Update:
    WhereIsPhantom.com has one of the latest documents filed in our case on-line for you to download and of course gives their thoughts on what IL's lawyers have to say about coverage of the case. To quote the filed motion from IL's attorneys:

    Infinium is concerned about the tactics of the Plaintiffs and their lawyers in this case. This case has received an unusual amount of publicity for a case of its type. In fact, Plaintiffs' counsel has issued their own press release announcing the institution of this action and that the Plaintiffs stand behind their negative statements about Infinium and Roberts. Likewise, the plaintiffs run a website called www.hardocp.com wherein they continue to publicize this lawsuit. Additionally, a website has been established called www.whereisphantom.com which "exists for the sole purpose of brining to light as many details as [it] can uncover about Infinium Labs, the lawsuit with KB Networks, and anything else that IL is involved in.

    It is my personal opinion that if they did not want this case to be publicized on the Web, they should have not threatened to sue a website multiple times.

    Just as a note, all documents that WhereIsPhantom.com posts are a matter of public record. You just have to pay to download them. Sounds like a pretty solid "tactic" to me. Just wait till it gets exciting.

  11. Guess Infinium got what they wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody's going to visit HardOCP for a while.
    Isn't that what Infinium wanted? :)

    1. Re:Guess Infinium got what they wanted by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      How is this even remotely funny considering the link is not to HardOCP's web site? Yeah you can't RTFA. Looks like mod goobs and poster goobs did not even preview the link.

  12. HardOCP Article by sbszine · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA is Slashdotted, but there's a small news article at HardOCP if you're interested.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  13. Kick ass! by mriker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Congrats HardOCP!!

    1. Re:Kick ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, off-topic?!? You fuckers slay me.

    2. Re:Kick ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's no -1, Cheerleading or -1, Worthless, so I guess offtopic is as close as they could get.

  14. I like [H]ard OCP by category_five · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I like [H]ard OCP because they stay true to their roots and post mostly about motherboards and stories interesting to the [H]ardware community while other hardware sites are now posting useless reviews of webcams, PDA's and wireless routers which have little to do with making your game machine be all it can be.(anandtech and tomshardwareguide).

    1. Re:I like [H]ard OCP by doormat · · Score: 1

      No doubt. [H] did a little review of one of those USB drives last week though. I've always found that their forums are really good to get answers and discuss things. When they're up.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    2. Re:I like [H]ard OCP by moonbender · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't mind them reviewing other kinds of hardware, but Tom's Hardware Guide these days posts everything from editorials to Linux advisories and, what's worse, freaking game previews.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:I like [H]ard OCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Up. HardOCP is just a played out "review" website.

    4. Re:I like [H]ard OCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like [next page]
      Tom's hardware [next page]
      also but [next page]
      it takes a [next page]
      while to get [next page]
      through them. [next page]
      Used to be all about [next page]
      hardware but it is [next page]
      straying from that path [next page]

    5. Re:I like [H]ard OCP by syukton · · Score: 1

      They're Texans--they's fightin' folk. Surely you know this by now.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  15. A little background please? by servoled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are these two in court exactly? It would be nice to provide some basic background for those of us out there who don't religiously follow HardOCP.

    --
    "I have a porkchop, you have a porkchop. I have a veal, you have a veal".
    1. Re:A little background please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They posted an "expose" on Infinium - shady history of CEO, their "offices" being nonexistant, their shady employees, etc etc. Infinium threatened to sue, sent them a C&D, so HardOCP sued them to get a statement from the court saying they are in the clear and legal and not committing libel/slander

    2. Re:A little background please? by category_five · · Score: 4, Informative

      [H]ard OCP posted a review of the phantom console detailing Phantoms liberal use of Hot glue in its construction and the lack of appeal of a subscription based console among other things. http://hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjU3 Also [H]ardOCP posted an editorial about the failed history of other ventures that the CEO of Infinium Labs, Timothy M. Roberts, has attempted. http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTEyLDE= This during the time when Infinium Labs was (and still is) attempting to raise capitol to start production of the Phantom. Understandably Infinium Labs sued [H]ardOCP for slander.

    3. Re:A little background please? by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Informative

      HardOCP is a gaming website. Last year, they ran an article questioning the Infinium Phantom Console which had been announced, but no one had yet seen.

      The article did some probing into the company, and some of their claims, such as the history of the president of Infinium.

      Infinium stated they would sue HardOCP over the letter, and sent e-mail to tell HardOCP to change or remove parts of the article. HardOCP didn't cave, and so, there was a lawsuit, and now it's progressed to this (which isn't really a win).

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    4. Re:A little background please? by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I remember, Infinium sued (or threatened to sue, I can't remember which) [H]ard OCP a while back for a negative article about the vaporware Phantom, some other interesting factoids, like the "storefront" being an empty office, etc...

      I can't remember what HOCP was suing them back for, though.

    5. Re:A little background please? by JInterest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Understandably Infinium Labs sued [H]ardOCP for slander.

      Not so understandably. Actually HardOCP pre-empted Infineum by filing for a declaratory judgment. Infinium is thus in an ugly position of having things they have been trying to gloss over proved in court. Tim Roberts must be a SCO-quality knucklehead. This is a lawsuit he didn't need to be involved in.

    6. Re:A little background please? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Informative

      they tried to pull a fast one and sue in Florida [with the super-sloppy business courts] when both parties "clearly" [again according to Infinium's own info!] had business presence in Texas. So Kyle counter-sued in Texas, where the site is, for "harassment" or the legal equivelant to nulify their suit.

    7. Re:A little background please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOCP did not really sue them (what reason would they have?), but used a Texas law that says if someone threatens you with a lawsuit, you can call their bluff and force them to court to prevent the threat of lawsuit being used as a form of blackmail.

    8. Re:A little background please? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't about the hotglue article, it never was, it's about this peice . and HardOCP actually sued Infinium, so which lawsuit this is is not exactly clear to me. There were lawsuits in different jusisdictions flying both ways.

    9. Re:A little background please? by miikrr · · Score: 1

      Basically, Infinium sues HardOCP for defamation (GS gi). Then HardOCP sues Infinium in order to "clear the air" after all the demands, allegations and threats made towards them (GS gi). Infinium counter-sues HardOCP again for defamation (GS gi).

    10. Re:A little background please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cthulhu

    11. Re:A little background please? by kjs3 · · Score: 1
      Understandably Infinium Labs sued [H]ardOCP for slander.

      Slander requires the statement of falsehood intended to damage reputation. Obviously, this is not the case here; the statements made were and are true. End of story.

      IL sued for the sole purpose of harrassing someone who had published information IL didn't want people to be aware of. Understandably, they got run over by someone who actually knew the law.

  16. hardocp won? by urban_gorilla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ahahahahahahahahaha!!!
    *sigh*

    --
    "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah." - Lennon, McCartney
  17. ALLOW ME TO BE THE FIRST TO SAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one, welcome our new Hard COP overlords!

    1. Re:ALLOW ME TO BE THE FIRST TO SAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard COP? I'll take hot grits any day.

    2. Re:ALLOW ME TO BE THE FIRST TO SAY... by IsoRashi · · Score: 1
      Hard COP? I'll take hot grits any day.
      Hot grits? Okay... *unzips pants*
      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  18. Past slashdot articles. by Llynix · · Score: 5, Informative

    For some background information you might want to check back to these past articles.

    1. Re:Past slashdot articles. by horatio · · Score: 1

      mod parent up.

      The poster and/or editors needed to include links like these in the summary. Otherwise even the avid /.er's scratch our heads wondering wth this is about.

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    2. Re:Past slashdot articles. by the_truk_stop · · Score: 1
      For some funny background information, you might want to check back to these past comic strips:
  19. I guess it's too late by miikrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14577 Damn I hope that company dies.

    1. Re:I guess it's too late by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks. I was just about to go searching for that article I wrote, and you saved me the trouble. Time for a followup.

      -Charlie

    2. Re:I guess it's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooo! If Infinium Labs dies, where am I going to get my $200 linux box from?

  20. Who did what to who in the what now? by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I am not one to generally criticize Slashdot for it's mistakes, dupes, slant or whatever. It is what it is. I just wish that the posters or the editors would give just a little background on the stories submitted, even if it is just a review from the last time it was discussed.

    There are people on this forum with a great deal of different backgrounds that may not always be familiar with the names, companies, and situations involved in stories that might interest a causal reader, without him or her having to dig up research just to know what the story is even about.

    1. Re:Who did what to who in the what now? by miikrr · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Who did what to who in the what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a site called Google when I want to fnid something, you should try it with "HardOCP Infinium court"
      You'll get big picture with the first few hits. ;)

  21. Excellent news by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm glad the court seems to have taken a no B.S. approach here, in response to the piles of it Infinium & its lawyers produced. That lawfirm especially needed its gonads ground into the dirt for the unprofessional way they tried to handle this.

    Kudos also to HardOCP for not running scared when faced with legal threats. If more of the "little guys" were able to stand strong against frivolous or iffy strong-armed legal challenges, the world might not be perfect but we'd be headed in a better direction.

    1. Re:Excellent news by D.+Book · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kudos also to HardOCP for not running scared when faced with legal threats. If more of the "little guys" were able to stand strong against frivolous or iffy strong-armed legal challenges, the world might not be perfect but we'd be headed in a better direction.

      While it is a victory for truth, it's a pretty small one, as it is hardly a case of David v. Goliath. Indeed, I suspect the whole matter is primarily an ego thing for HardOCP, having gained some insight into the personality of the owner after an e-mail exchange several years ago. Yes, Infinium was dishonest, but the key factor was that they were weak--as mentioned by others, they didn't even have a storefront--so it wouldn't surprise me if HardOCP saw it as a perfect opportunity to kick some butt and show off. It actaully reminds me a bit of the kind of small-target consumer advocacy that sensationalist current affairs programmes love. They go after individuals and small, shonky businesses that can't fight back, while large companies that screw their customers get more conciliatory treatment.

      So we should see it for what it is. If a website goes to court against a major peripheral manufacturer to defend their rights, that will be noteworthy and deserving of our respect and admiration.

    2. Re:Excellent news by syukton · · Score: 1

      Since the majority are the "little guys" I believe you mean: if people had more character the world would be a better place.

      I'll drink to that.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  22. Look! Signs of a computer! by Foxxz · · Score: 1

    HardOCP has a few pics of the console on their site. if you look at this pic near the center inside the console you can spy a DVI connector. Looks like they just ran off some of the S-video and other connectors from that card.

    -Foxxz

    1. Re:Look! Signs of a computer! by Foxxz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forgot to mention HardOCP actually DOES open the thing up. Its just a p4 with all the cards connected to the back with hot glue.

      -Foxxz

    2. Re:Look! Signs of a computer! by orim · · Score: 1

      Wow. Interesting. Ok, so here's something that makes me think the designers are stupid. Or rather: the designers were stupid if this thing really existed.

      Why would you ever have line/line 10/100,DSL,Cable modem connectors, all in one device???

      1) From what I understand, this device needs high bandwidth connection, since I think a part of their business model is downloading games. So that should eliminate line in part.

      2) Line 10/100; that's fine.

      3) Cable and DSL connectors? You kidding me? First, doesn't DSL connect with a regular phone cord? Couldn't you just use line in for that, if you really wanted it?

      And why would you *ever* build a whole cable modem into a device? Whenever you get cable/DSL service, they rent you out a cable modem for like $5/month. There's a reason most people don't buy these, it's because the specifications/speeds change, and people move and go to different companies which now don't support your old cable modem.

      The point being, if you're going with high speed, all you need is your 10/100 connection. Why waste money on something most users will never use???

      *I* would know better, and my qualifications are some 10-20 computers put together.
      Jesus Christ this stinks of amateurism... these guys aren't even smart scam-artists!

      --
      "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  23. In related news.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    3D Realms threatens to sue the next person to compare them to Infinium.

  24. Shouldn't it be... by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1

    Where is whereisphandom.com?

  25. what this is all about. (informative) by blackest_k · · Score: 3, Informative

    HardOCP won a battle against infinium in court.
    Ok whats the battle about?
    stolen from CNN

    (CNN) -- A few weeks ago a new game console was unveiled on the Web called Phantom.

    Its developer, Infinium Labs, promises it will be the "must-have high performance game console," and that the Phantom will provide "more access to more games of every genre than any competing product," all "with blazing speed."

    Six months ago, it was only a rumor among hardcore gamers. In fact, it seemed Phantom was, as the American Heritage dictionary put it, "an image that appears only in the mind; an illusion."

    The juiciest rumor was that there never would be a console called Phantom. The conspiracy theory went that the whole thing was a hoax, concocted as a PR stunt.

    Looks like Hardocp called bullshit and now a judge is agreeing with them and infinium is getting slapped.
    now read on...

    1. Re:what this is all about. (informative) by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Kyle called "bullshit" back in september of last year. Don't know why, but Kyle wrote a ripping piece on them from out of nowhere...maybe they had some of his money!! [haha] but for some reason they pulled his chain and he went digging...and found free and clear public knowlage that they weren't what they said they were...hell their stated office address at the time was a vacant rundown store!

      For some reason they tried to sue HIM to take the article down like 4 months later!!! He corrected matters of fact...silly stuff that didn't change any of the article's real information. They tried to drag him to court in Florida...so he "counter" sued in Texas court [where Kyle lives and supposedly they had an office also!] to have a case dismissed... they then preceded to sue him again.

      I can't say why this is such a big deal. The only thing I can see is that Roberts appears to be a serial "scammer" [but then 50% of VC seekers are anyway] and it was just too easy a target for Kyle to pass up...and if you read the forums or letters replys, Kyle LOVES a good Flame war! can you say recipe for trouble!!!

    2. Re:what this is all about. (informative) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's probably been a while since you've read the original article, but you messed up on a fact or two. I'm not picking on you. I just believe facts are important, and when someone inadvertently misses a few details, we can easily clear it up by checking the facts. ...hell their stated office address at the time was a vacant rundown store!

      In actuality, the address was a Mailboxes Etc mailbox. The vacant storefront just happened to be in the same strip mall, thus the initial confusion.

      Another fact that you got wrong is that Kyle didn't counter sue, he sued pre-emptively (justifiably, imo) after receiving various legal threats. Read about it here.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  26. Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by DAldredge · · Score: 0

    These Coral links don't work have the time, till they fix them it isn't worth /.ing them to hell and back.

    1. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      They don't work because by the time somebody posts a Coral link, the site is already down.

      Coral is a cacheing solution; unless it can get a copy of the site to cache it, it can't serve it up.

      This is why Coral needs to be used beforehand (IE, in the slashdot post) in order to be of any use. And even then, it works best on sites that have relative URLs on the images.

      A suggestion to the owner of said site: Coralize as much of your site as you can, and enable HTTP compression (mod_gzip, mod_deflate, IIS6's compression, etc) for whatever else you can. With all that combined even a home connection should be able to handle a slashdotting.

    2. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Guspaz · · Score: 1, Informative

      Luckily this is one situation where we have the power to implement this change to slashdot ourselves; all it takes is for the article submitters to use Coral for their links. So far I've seen one article use Coral for the primary link... Unfortunately the Coral'd site didn't use relative URLs for the images, so the server got swamped; it didn't have to serve up the HTML as that was Coral'd, but it had to serve up the images, because they still linked back to the original site.

    3. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Guspaz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, then here, see it working properly:

      http://servermatrix.com.nyud.net:8090/

      It appears to be coralizing the entire page properly. All the images are relative links, so all the images are served up through the cache.

      If you're wondering why the page loads so slowly through Coral, that's because nobody is loading the page through Coral in bulk; without a large number of requests to the system, the page won't be cached right away, and you'll have to wait for Coral to download the content before it serves it up to you. However, it IS working and serving it to you; further requests should return cached copies.

    4. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Can you still mod? I have been told by quite a few /.ers with 4 digit UIDs that they are unable to mode anymore.

    5. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Try counting the spaces in his UID.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      It is close enought. And yes we do read two different /.s

      The old slashdot wasn't overran by kids who think that compiling something with -O3 makes them computer experts.

    7. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Chris+Siegler · · Score: 1
      Can you still mod? I have been told by quite a few /.ers with 4 digit UIDs that they are unable to mode anymore.

      Yup, I can still mod.

      I'll give this a rather bizarre "Informative" to prove it.

    8. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Dazza · · Score: 1

      No problem modding here either. Used some mod points just yesterday.

      --
      -- "I know that this is vitriol, no solution, spleen-venting, but I feel better having screamed, don't you ?"
    9. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Coral is a cacheing solution; unless it can get a copy of the site to cache it, it can't serve it up.
      This is why Coral needs to be used beforehand (IE, in the slashdot post) in order to be of any use. And even then, it works best on sites that have relative URLs on the images."
      "

      So all it would take is someone who autoloads the slashdot RDF anyway to parse the links out of it, and request them on coral

      Or request the front page, to avoid being blacklisted for taking the RDF too often...

    10. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the links are relative to start with, when one person fetches them from Coral the first time, his browser will subsequently fetch all the inline images into Coral as well.

      If the links are absolute, a person using the Coral cache will never touch Coral for those links, so prefetching those images purposely into Coral won't help either.

      One good solution would just be somebody who gets Slashdot's feed to automatically fetch the Coralized version of all URLs seen and thus "seed" the Coral system. Kinda like a crawler for Coral.

  27. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by Llama_STi · · Score: 1, Troll

    Has anyone asked the question of why does Kyle [HardOCP] have such a dick up his ass about this console? Even when this thing was first announced it seemed like their was a vendetta against Infinium Labs. I'm not a fan or anything, it's just strange that [H] would go after IL so ferociously and mercilessly when they haven't even had a chance to put their final product on the table. If this product fails out of the gates, a good deal will be due to the crusade of bad publicity that Kyle seems to have taken upon himself. Maybe IL is a bunch of assholes but how would anyone trying to start up a new company feel if someone made it their personal and public business to ruin yours?! Seems a little unfair to IL and definitely makes Kyle look like a unprofessional, childish little boy in the process. :P I used to have a lot more respect for the guy before these Phantom smear-campaign shenanigans...

  28. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by His+Nastiness · · Score: 5, Funny

    No I think the system would fail 1) becuase the world does NOT need another console (and I challenge anyone to prove to me that consumers have been crying for another system) 2) because of its shit content delivery system (do we really want this, really? Most people want their games on media if for no other reason than to trade the crap/old games for credit at a store) 3) because people love an underdog, unless ofcourse, it's a boastful, litigious, ill-conceived underdog in which case you could sell tickets for front row seats to an exclusive showing of its spectacular and fiery failure. I personally can't wait for this thing to end in a smoldering ruin and bring shame upon everyone involved. Even if it is a good idea my wallet only allows for so many good ideas.

  29. Infinium wants to be on the ASE... by Artifex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how these lawsuits are going to look in their planned filing with the American Stock Exchange?

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  30. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are you a shill, or do you honestly not know the history?

    [H] simply called bullshit on IL's claims about the phantom. IL responded in the fashion that Mark Felchstain, Spammer Lawyer, would be proud of: a SLAPP suit. That kind of garbage sure justifies the "dick up [Kyle's] ass." You don't see that kind of crap lawsuit flying around whenever someone makes a crack about DNF.

  31. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But They're trying to "sell snow to eskimos" so to speak. True, it's just a PC..but that's what they've always said. It's a PC with lots of DRM, [you can't open it or run regular software, store bought stuff, or anything like that] required to be online to download last year's pc titles for Full price ... Plus subscription for the "service". The hardware's not hot enough to run something like DOOM3 so it's not even viable for 75% of the PC game market.

    originally the unit was "demo'd" nearly 2 years ago...it was nearly 1 year of vapor before kyle ripped on it...and the guy hawking it is still getting VC funding!!! WTF It's a failed business right from the start...any /.r would recognize that from the start... but when a pro starts hawking "computer", "broadband", "pay per play", "Secure" and such terms the VCs still see the $$ no matter how logic seems to fail the situation!!

  32. Re:NO, NO, NO by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know what, no matter how many times you rant in this thread about the "hachet job", everything HardOCP posted is true about Infinium and the CEO.

    Was it in strong? Yes. Was it perhaps a bit tactless? Yes. Was it all true and provable? Yes.

    Oh, and when you threaten someone, except the possibility of getting sued. Most companies and people do not take legal threats lightly.

  33. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wish I would have bought some stock in Infinium when it first went public and then sold in about a week or two after that. =\

  34. Bitch Slap by Shihar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason why they are so nasty to each other is because HardOCP originally ran a piece calling bullshit against Infinuim. That in it of itself is not "having a dick up one's ass". That is just a little journalism. What happened next was that Infinium then said that they were going to sue if HardOCP didn't get rid of the story. Now, it is true the American thing to do is to sue when someone pisses you off. However, it is also very much the American thing to tell someone who is being an ass to go fuck themselves and continue to piss them off just out of spite. Hence you the posting you see today today.

    All of that said, I have a great deal of respect for HardOCP. People throw threaten lawsuits over dumb shit like this too often. It is nice to see someone punch these fuckers back.

  35. The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by British · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a fun idea.

    1. get a linux system together with some good hardware. Make it mini-itx
    2. Take out all non-game-console-specific stuff out. Make it a small distro
    3. Buy a game controller from the store, get drivers working for it
    4. Setup some crude kiosk frontend that might be what the Phantom would have
    5. Install MAME on it or something and pretend the arcade ROMs ae the games Phantom would be selling(this is just an example)
    6. Put a fancy plastic case around it.

    Then realize you have some crude implmentation of what might have been a Phantom console, only for the cost of hardware, and people's free time to slap together a fancy front end with a Linux engine(not unlike TiVo)

    7. wait for lawsuits from Infinium labs to roll in saying you copied their idea

    8. brag about it on here and HardOCP. They have a plastic box and hype, you have a somewhat crude , working implementation of what they have promised, but never delivered.

    Whee

    1. Re:The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well..

      the pricing that's been thrown around actually suggests that infinum would be doing an up-front loss on every hardware unit sold(and they hoping to claim that back later.. this of course needs enermous amounts of money from them just to launch the thing in the scale that they've enviosioned).

      ("just for the price of hardware" therefore would cost more than phantom)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the brilliant disposable phone business idea. Hire some fugitives of the law to be your top company officers, preferably some people known for having started a fake online casino and having run away with the money of their investors. Covertly buy $200 Nokia phones. Remove their plastic shell and their logo. Surround them in cardboard. Call them prototypes. Tell investors you're going to sell those phones for below $30 and watch the diligent hard-hitting investigative "journalists" hype your wonderful innovative product to no end.

    3. Re:The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be rude, but they're still in business. The article you posted is from 2001. And it looks like they actually have product.

      What is the point here?

    4. Re:The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Not trying to be rude, but they're still in business. The article you posted is from 2001. And it looks like they actually have product. What is the point here?

      I don't need a point, it's your job to come up with whatever conclusion you want to come up with. I stand by the facts I presented -- they're all verifiable in the press and on the web.

      The fact that Hop-on still has a web site with cell phones on it doesn't bother me. It's been three years already and its web site still doesn't have a disposable cardboard phone for under $30, a claim that made them one of the most heavily hyped companies in the world. If a web site like Napster or a small outfit like Virgin Mobile has its own brand, it's entirely possible for such a successful scam like Hop-on to still be worth something and even have its own "line" of phones.

    5. Re:The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9. ????
      10. Profit!

  36. Can we just ignore Performer Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Performer Guy is an obvious shill for Ininium. Please ignore his trolls. As documented in another thread, his nonsense bears little to nothing to reality. Fortunately the facts are documented quite well elsewhere on this thread.

    I figure he's either the Iraq Minister of Information, or a
    friend of the CEO of Infinium.

    1. Re:Can we just ignore Performer Guy? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sigh, I haven't misrepresented any facts and not everyone who disagrees with you is a shill for the other side. There'd be no point to astroturfing here as it's a feeding frenzy anyway. I'm not trolling, as for the facts I've posted the original hatchet peice in other threads, yup to anyone interested go check the facts and for your own opinion.

    2. Re:Can we just ignore Performer Guy? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Keep saying "Sigh" at the beginning of each of your posts. It really makes me give serious consideration to your thoughts.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Can we just ignore Performer Guy? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I get the impression that he's actually one of those people who actually says the word "sigh", instead of making the sound when in conversation.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  37. Cite for original post by gatzke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I should have cited the original comment where I got this from:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=120887&thres ho ld=1&commentsort=3&tid=124&mode=thread&cid=1018654 6

    This trick was originally posted by tqft (619476), but tqft cited Jesse Rudderman (Moz/FF/etc guy) as the original source.

    Now if taco (or some outsource programmer in Mumbai) could just get us a nice little "use normal /. colors on all pages" check box in our prefs...

    1. Re:Cite for original post by SimianOverlord · · Score: 1, Informative

      Now if taco (or some outsource programmer in Mumbai) could just get us a nice little "use normal /. colors on all pages" check box in our prefs..

      Go to your settings homepage tab and check the "Light" box. Black text on white background, all the time. No shitty colour schemes.

      --
      Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    2. Re:Cite for original post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. Any chance we can get SCO to go after HOCP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a thought....

    1. Re:Any chance we can get SCO to go after HOCP? by CamelToes · · Score: 1

      I hope you mean, get [H]ardOCP after SCO ...

  39. Boilerroom by threedays · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone else been getting spam promoting the purchase of infinium labs stock? Too lazy to look for one of them, but its on one of those non sec stock markets.

    Has infinium turned into one of those fake boilerroom companies, with some people trying to cash out real quick?

    1. Re:Boilerroom by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's traded on the OTCBB, which falls under Nasdaq.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Boilerroom by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. Over-the-counter stocks are just that; they are unlisted on major exchanges such as the Nasdaq. Check the SEC's page for the roots of the misconception:

      http://www.sec.gov/answers/otcbb.htm

    3. Re:Boilerroom by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Ooops :)

      I've heard it so very often referred to the Nasdaq OTC board, so naturally I assumed it was true :)

      Thing is, When you're moved off Nasdaq for not meeting their standards, that's probably where you'll end up. (or under chapter 11)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:Boilerroom by KirkH · · Score: 1

      There's OTC and then there's OTCBB. Different beasts. All the NASDAQ stocks are OTC. An OTC stock just means that it's not Listed. Listed stocks are traded on the NYSE.

      Technically, NASDAQ is not an exchange, so NASDAQ stocks are unlisted. AAPL, DELL, SUNW, etc are all OTC stocks. The NASD oversees trading of both OTC and OTCBB stocks.

    5. Re:Boilerroom by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Actually, look here It talks quite a bit about Nasdaq overseeing the OTCBB...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  40. HAHAHAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > It's a PC with lots of DRM, [... deleted ]

    Ahhh! Now were getting down to why some (many?)
    in the "Slashdot" community can't stand this
    company or it's product. It in if fact has
    *nothing* to do with how good the console is or
    isn't. It could be the best console on the market
    and you would still be opposed to it, because of
    some so-called DRM scheme. It would seem that you
    have adopted someting of a Luddite mentality. It
    is people such as yourself which impede technical
    progress. Subscription based software delivery
    via high-speed data pipes *is* the future.
    Whether one can keep a copy of said program for
    "personal use" is a different matter. It would be
    ashame if people such as yourself are able to
    impede technological advancement with dogmatic
    political theory concerning DRM, and IP.

  42. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by RsG · · Score: 1

    Ah, Mr Roberts, I presume?

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  43. Re:NO, NO, NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you post the same thing over and over and over again? And with your bonus each and every time.

  44. pretty obvious by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once they released the specs for that box it seemed pretty obvious that it was just a scan to pull in a few extra VC dollars. All this time with nary a peep coupled with [H]ard ops investigative work and the cover is revealed. In allot of ways the Internet *is* the great equalizer.

    CB

  45. Try not contradicting yourself. by Generalisimo+Zang · · Score: 1

    If "subscription-based software delivery via high-speed data pipes is the future", as you say, then how could anyone possibly impede it using only what you call "dogmatic political theory"?

    If it's possible to impede it, then it AINT "the future".

    Someone might be stupid enough to buy what is essentially a nuetered and locked-down PC with outdated graphics capability, and then pay for content.

    But that's hardly "the future". That's just a marketing scam that relies on stupid and/or gullible people.

    1. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If "subscription-based software delivery via
      > high-speed data pipes is the future", as you say,
      > then how could anyone possibly impede it using
      > only what you call "dogmatic political theory"?
      >
      > If it's possible to impede it, then it AINT "the
      > future".

      Tsk, tsk. How pedantic. Yawn...

      Lots of great ideas that *should* have been
      weren't because of zealots who in order to
      assert their intellectual dogma destroy anything
      which contradicts their beliefs (even if the
      contradiction is true.) Conversely, lots of
      things which are, but shouldn not have been,
      and for the same reason.

      > Someone might be stupid enough to buy what is
      > essentially a nuetered and locked-down PC with
      > outdated graphics capability, and then pay for
      > content.

      And an Xbox is state-of-the-art? Still, they
      seem to be selling a lot of them don't they.
      Last time I checked, when you buy a game cd
      you are still "paying for content".

    2. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      And an Xbox is state-of-the-art? Still, they
      seem to be selling a lot of them don't they.
      Last time I checked, when you buy a game cd
      you are still "paying for content".


      Yes, you are.

      But that content doesn't go away if MS goes out of business, I can loan it to friends, and get other things on loan too.

    3. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yes, you are.
      >
      > But that content doesn't go away if MS goes out
      > of business, I can loan it to friends, and get
      > other things on loan too.

      Your point is valid and a good one. It didn't
      escape me and I think that being able to keep
      a copy for yourself and posterity is reasonable.
      However, that does not make a system in which
      you can't keep a copy for yourself immoral or
      unreasonable. Just different. I suspect that you
      fall into a small percentage of people. Most
      people (the average consumer) would probably be
      thrilled to pay $9.95 a month and get to play all
      the latest games rather than paying $30-$50 for a
      game. And at the end of the day these same people
      really don't care about having a "copy" for them-
      selves. The vast majority of people play a game
      for a while ( 1 year) and then throw the disk
      in the closet where it will never see the light
      of day again.

      BTW, I would think that loaning your games to
      friends violates personal and/or fair use and
      this is why companies are clamping down.

    4. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Twyst · · Score: 1

      >BTW, I would think that loaning your games to
      >friends violates personal and/or fair use and
      >this is why companies are clamping down.

      uhm, care to explain how my loaning the PURCHASED version of [insert game here] to a friend, so he can play it, violates personal and/or fair use? Nobody said copying..

      I guess libraries and video rental stores are violating as well, then. I suppose you'd support per-person DRM, with a license per controller. Heaven forbid your friends watch you play the game without having bought their own copy!

      --
      -- Karma is for people who think they matter.
    5. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I guess libraries and video rental stores are
      > violating as well, then. I suppose you'd
      > support per-person DRM, with a license per
      > controller.

      Gee, I don't know. Tell you what. You put up
      a web page with that gives people access to
      games and movies that you have purchased. You
      can allow one person at a time to "use" your
      game or video. Make sure though that you let
      the companies that distribute the media know
      what your doing. Also, let us know how it turns
      out. I'll be especially curios to know how much
      you ended up spending in attorney's fees.

    6. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by lokedhs · · Score: 1
      Someone might be stupid enough to buy what is essentially a nuetered and locked-down PC with outdated graphics capability, and then pay for content.
      They already did, remember XBox?
    7. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by MrGeck · · Score: 1

      I guess libraries and video rental stores are violating as well, then. Yeah, that's actually called a "bailment," which is paying someone for short-term ownership of a product. Rental stores are charged more than the standard 50 or so bucks for a game because they have to buy a license and the company lets them rent out their product to make money. With crappy games, though, the rental place usually gets screwed on the money and then they have to rely on stupid and gullable people to rent those games.

      --
      John Pippin - Managing Editor, PsxNation.com
    8. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Netflix. If you don't copy the game/video/whatever, and there's only 1 physical copy in existence, it's perfectly legal and it should stay that way.

    9. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      BTW, I would think that loaning your games to
      friends violates personal and/or fair use and
      this is why companies are clamping down.


      Nope, Right Of First Sale. I have a copy, I can do what I want with it short of distributing new copies. Any system that violates this is arguably illegal.

      It's no different than loaning a CD or a book to a friend.

    10. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > It's called Netflix ...

      Nice try, call Netflix and ask them what type
      of licensing arrangments they have with their
      distributors.

    11. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by Twyst · · Score: 1

      Actually, I *did* know this (not the actual term, mind you). I was engaging in some hyperbole, if you will, to point out just how ridiculous his statement was. I mean, come on, how does it violate anything to loan a friend a game or book or CD? It's not like you're going "Sure, here's a copy of this CD you like."

      --
      -- Karma is for people who think they matter.
    12. Re:Try not contradicting yourself. by MrGeck · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not saying that I care, personally. I burn CDs for myself and people all the time. I let people borrow movies, games, music, etc. Just letting everyone in on a fact that I learned the day before.

      --
      John Pippin - Managing Editor, PsxNation.com
  46. Re:NO, NO, NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    know a hatchet piece when I see one
    Kind of like the quote, "I don't know what art is, but I know what I like." Of course, you are trying to point to a dog turd and call it art, so, there ya go.
  47. Suspicious to say the least by motox · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Given the giants Infinium is competing with ( Sony and Microsoft ), I find highly suspicious that
    a web magazine has the money to go do personal searches about the CEO of a small time competitor, to the point of paying laywers to bring them to court with this kind of results...

    just my 2 cents

    1. Re:Suspicious to say the least by Sir+Homer · · Score: 2, Informative

      HardOCP is one of the largest hardware sites on the net, and generates over six figures of revenue a year. They aren't exactly your sister's personal website.

    2. Re:Suspicious to say the least by Highroller · · Score: 1

      Hey don't talk about his sister like that. She's GOOD!

    3. Re:Suspicious to say the least by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Uh. Don't tell me she's one of those drawing six figures _profit_ from her personal (intimate?)webcam site? ;).

      --
    4. Re:Suspicious to say the least by motox · · Score: 1

      Lol, "generates"

  48. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > but when a pro starts hawking "computer",
    > "broadband", "pay per play", "Secure"

    Hmmm, last time I checked this is a free
    country (U.S.A.) and if people want a "secure",
    "computer", with "broadband" capability, and
    want to "pay-per-play" for the games it is their
    choice. Maybe some people like this approach. Who
    are you to say they can't have a system like this
    because of *your* political and economic beliefs?
    Must be more of that "free", "...as in freedom"
    I'm always hearing about.

    Hmmm, subscription based gaming, hmmm, monthly
    fees. Where have I heard this before? Ummm, Ev...
    Ever... Everquest! Nah, it'll never work.

  49. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by Lonath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem that you
    have adopted someting of a Luddite mentality. It
    is people such as yourself which impede technical
    progress. Subscription based software delivery
    via high-speed data pipes *is* the future.


    I doubt there are any true "Luddites" on slashdot. Opposing some kinds of technology does not make you a Luddite. Opposing all kinds of technology does. There are very few technological things that /. readers oppose en masse, and perhaps the reason those things are opposed is that advancing those few bad technologies makes advancing the rest of the good ones bad. IMO the DRM people are more the Luddites since they essentially need to make computers illegal to protect their content.

  50. Phantom Launch Title by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever ...

    It's like a modern-day "which came first?"

  51. yeah, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, you aren't fooling anyone. Just be grateful you had no karma to lose.

  52. Re:NO, NO, NO by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

    Seems like your rants are pitting speculation against speculation. Care to provide some examples?

  53. your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Kerry and Edwards are peddling the same socialism that Clinton & Gore delivered on America, then sign me up. This Bush administration is driving our country into the ground.

    1. Re:your sig by nursedave · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Which Bush policy is driving the country into the ground? Since the US economy was taking a nosedive before Bush took office, and dove a little harder before even one of his economic incentives went into effect, then really plummetted after 9/11, which maybe could/maybe couldn't have been avoided if Clinton had done a proper job protecting us, then I'm not sure what you're getting at.

      But then, you don't either.

      Clinton increased our taxes. This gives us less to spend. Bush decreased our taxes. Not only is this right, for it is our money to begin with, not the governments, but it gives us more to spend. As Clinton himself told other nations as advice to encourage development. Not really an adequate argument against that, I'm afraid.

      (I know, I shouldn't feed the trolls, but he was so *cute*!)

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    2. Re:your sig by zbuffered · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He's not trolling, he's responding to your .sig.

      The US economy faltered right after Bush won the primary. I'm not going to try to convince you that it was related...

      Which Bush policy is driving the country into the ground? The Iraq policy. We wouldn't be in a war (that we may not even win) if it weren't for Bush and the neo-conservatives. It's that simple. Whether you like the war or not, it's Bush's war, he owns it, and even though we are the mightiest nation in the world, it seems that he's losing it for us, with the gravest consequences. What? No WMD? Well... Well... Democracy! We're bringing them Democracy! That's a great excuse to invade a sovereign nation (that just happens to have oil).

      The UN would be accusing us of war crimes today if they weren't so pussified (like we designed them to be) and we weren't America. If France went into Haiti like we went into Iraq, we would be accusing them of war crimes. If the French tortured innocent Haitians, killing some in the process, and didn't even bother to interrogate some of them, we would have something to say about that, wouldn't we?

      Remember when those planes hit the WTC? What did we do about that? Osama who? "I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him." That's because he put those resources in Iraq.

      Clinton increased our taxes, giving "us" less to spend, but in so doing he funded social programs that gave us benefits. The average wage-earner today keeps more of the money he makes, but he spends more of it too, on things like health care. He isn't necessarily coming out ahead.

      Also, Clinton balanced the budget.

      Meanwhile, we're running huge deficits. Neo-conservatives are not fiscal conservatives. To quote Cheney, "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter. We won the midterm elections. Our due is another big tax cut."

      Almost 4 years and 10 trillion dollars later*, what do we have to show for it? No child left behind? An increasing gap between rich and poor? Record corporate profits?

      * At the beginning of Bush's term, Greenspan's first testimony before congress was that we needed the tax cut to "avoid paying off the national debt too quickly". We were projecting $5t surplus over 10 years. Now we're projecting $5t deficit. Your share is almost $34,000.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    3. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Bush policy is driving the country into the ground? The Iraq policy. We wouldn't be in a war (that we may not even win) if it weren't for Bush and the neo-conservatives. It's that simple. Whether you like the war or not, it's Bush's war, he owns it, and even though we are the mightiest nation in the world, it seems that he's losing it for us, with the gravest consequences. What? No WMD? Well... Well... Democracy! We're bringing them Democracy! That's a great excuse to invade a sovereign nation (that just happens to have oil).

      We wouldn't be in war if say someone like John Kerry had won the 2000 election?

      "It is something that we know for instance that Saddam hussein has used weapons of mass destruction against his own people, and there is some evidence that their efforts to try secure these types of weapons is being tested" - Sen. John Kerry - 9/23/01 - Face the Nation

      "He is and has acted like a terrorist and he has engaged in activities that are accepted ..." "I think we have to put the heat on Saddam Hussein, I've said that for a number of years bill, I criticized the Clinton administration for backing off of the inspections when ambassador Butler was giving us strong evidence to that we needed to continue. I think that we need to put pressure on no matter what the evidence is about September 11th" - Sen. John Kerry - The O'Reilly Factor - 12/11/01

      "I think we clearly have to keep the pressure on terrorism globally, this doesn't end with afghanistan by any imagination and I think the president's made that clear, I think we've made that clear, terrorism is a global menace, it's a scourge and it's absolutely vital that we continue, for instance Saddam Hussein" - Sen. John Kerry - Larry King Live - 12/14/01

      "I would disagree with John McCain that it's the actual weapons of mass destruction that he may use against us, it's what he may do with another invasion of Kuwait or a miscalculation about the kurds or a miscalculation about Iran or particularly Israel, those are the things that I think present the greatest danger he may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terroist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the Unite States, it's the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat." - Sen. John Kerry - Face the Nation - 9/15/02

      "George I said at the time I would have preferred if we had given diplomacy a greater opportunity but I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein and when the president made the decision I supported him and I support the fact that we did disarm him." - Sen. John Kerry - Democratic Debate 5/3/03

      Now I know you didn't say anything specifically pro-Kerry, but I just find it so amusing that everyone is quick to flame Bush when it's obvious he was not alone in his opinion of how to deal with the problems the country faced. When you couple this anti-Bush sentiment with the fact that Kerry was clearly for the war before and after it began, it's hard to take the Bush bashers seriously.

      My biggest complaint with liberals is that they are emotional and reactionary. The liberal philosophy appeals to the heart not the sense. If the liberal argument is based on rational thinking, how else can you explain thousands of liberals being explicitly anti-Bush while supporting Kerry, a candidate that supported the same policy they cite as grounds to get rid of Bush for? The liberal argument is only that, an argument, there is never a viable plan backing these statements that the war is wrong. Where has Kerry stated how he would handle this war he would inherit?

      Meanwhile, we're running huge deficits. Neo-conservatives are not fiscal conservatives. To quote Cheney, "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter. We won the midterm elections. Our due is another big tax cut."

      Almost 4 years and 10 trillion dollars later*, what do we have to show for it? No child left behind? An increasing gap between rich and poor? Record corpora

    4. Re:your sig by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      We wouldn't be in war if say someone like John Kerry had won the 2000 election?

      You mean Gore?

      If you haven't, I'd suggest watching the speech he gave in May (the one Republicans harped on as crazy ranting) titled Fmr. Vice Pres. Al Gore Speech on Iraq Policy linked from here on C-SPAN. I watched the speech and I'm pretty sure we wouldn't be in Iraq if he had won the 2000 elect... if Gore was president. ;)

      My biggest complaint with liberals is that they are emotional and reactionary. The liberal philosophy appeals to the heart not the sense.
      I feel the same way about conservatives (substitute emotional for manipulative), so we'll have to agree to disagree.

      Where has Kerry stated how he would handle this war he would inherit?

      That's one of the biggest problems I see that Kerry has: a weak, all-talk-no-action Iraq policy. Iraq is the biggest election issue today, and to take a cursory look at his website, you wouldn't know that we're at war there. His "plan".

      But what about Bush? Where has he laid out his plan? It's his war, shouldn't he lay out his plans? Maybe here? Nope, no plan. Nobody knows what they're going to do with Iraq, but Bush should actually be doing something right now. Right now, Bush is the President of the United States. He stirred up a hornets nest in Iraq. What is he doing about it right now? He's not telling you.

      ...how else can you explain thousands of liberals being explicitly anti-Bush while supporting Kerry, a candidate that supported the same policy they cite as grounds to get rid of Bush for?

      Liberals, I guess including me, rally around Kerry because he's the only hope we have of getting rid of Bush. We're pragmatists that way. That's why we're against Nader running. To be honest, I didn't vote last election. I wasn't a Democrat or a Republican. I wasn't even registered to vote. But you can bet I'll vote in this election. I'll vote to change the course, because I see us headed over Niagara Falls, and I want to try and turn the boat around.

      Come to think of it, I dont' remember the liberals denouncing the fall of communism as a result of Reagans coldwar hedge bet. Amazing though, they sure as hell knew that spending was wrong at the time.

      Do you still beat your wife?

      Personally, I believe that deficit spending is almost always wrong, and deficit spending on defense when there is not a clear need for it is even more so. Having been very young at the time when this all happened, I can't give you more than that.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    5. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're bringing them Democracy! That's a great excuse to invade a sovereign nation (that just happens to have oil).

      Why is it that everyone cries "He's just doing it for oil!" ANWAR has a projected yield of 1.4million barrels/day and one can assume would come at a much lower price tag than the price of getting oil out of Iraq. There is a republican president, a republican congress, and Alaska has a republican governor. If it was all about oil then I think ANWAR would be drilled well before Iraq would be invaded.

    6. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah, your italicizing my line to quote it un-italicized "happens".

      You have a point, I'll give you that. But why aren't we doing anything about any of the other rogue countries? Oil is one plausible explanation, if for no other reason than that it was an easier sell because Iraq can "finance it's own reconstruction" through oil revenues. Which as we know isn't happening (to the extent imagined), but that's beside the point.

    7. Re:your sig by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      In the Reagan vs. Bush comparison, I can only add that at the time, the Soviet Union and the nuclear disparity (the illusion anyway) constituted a clear and present danger to the United States, as at least one close call at NORAD nearly brought us to the brink of nuclear annihilation.

      Iraq posed a danger only to his neighbors. While I'm all for the elimination of evil dictators, and the delivery of self governance to peoples all over the world, doing it at the point of a gun where to opponent presents no clear danger, and whose citizens hate us is stupid.

      The issue of Iraq breaking the UN Peace Accords it voluntarily agreed to is the ONLY reason I feel the war in Iraq is justified, notwithstanding the above feel-good liberation aspects which are nice, but do not justify unilateral invasion on their own.

    8. Re:your sig by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Iraq's repayment of reconstruction is going to come at an oil price to the US of x% cheaper/bbl than OPEC would normally allow. The Administration surely isn't counting on Iraq to start paying us back (if ever) for at least 5 years. You have to feed, cloth, and rebuild hospitals first.

  54. he's not astroturfing by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    Performer Guy has a UID of 5 digits. Astroturfing accounts are usually newer. It's not like he's posting as an anonymous coward.

    1. Re:he's not astroturfing by moojin · · Score: 1

      I saw his ID Number too and came to the same conclusion that he is not astroturfing. But at the same time, I'm not sure what is his motivation for defending Infinium Labs.

      Kind of odd...

      --
      Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  55. I applied for a job with them by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..right when this whole feud started. They seemed like nice enough people. The were set up in temp offices in Seattle's bank of America building. Most of the PMs are ex-Microsoft (No MS jokes please, we are torching IL right now...) and at the time they were looking to hire a ton of people. They had the hardware done (Although I never saw it, being a first interiew), and were looking at the software delivery system. The ranking manager came off as a bit odd, but I didn't get and sense of shysters trying to pull a fast one or clueless idiots who couldn't pull it off. If all the negative press about the president being totally evil/inept isn't true, I'd give the console a fifty percent chance of seeing the light of day.

    The guys I talked to even thought that PA's shot at them was funny, so they have a sense of humor about all the press. I'm sort of glad I wasn't offered a job, though. Too much wierd stuff was happening.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:I applied for a job with them by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They seemed like nice enough people.

      Has it actually escaped your attention that the good con artists always do? It's their primary stock in trade.

      Has it also actually escaped your attention that the employees of a good con artist are often as not just as much dupes of the scam as the customers?

      "But they seemed so nice!" is the nearly universal cry of the suckered.

      KFG

    2. Re:I applied for a job with them by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      Has it actually escaped your attention that the good con artists always do? It's their primary stock in trade.

      Well, that was my point. The employees were capable and intent on making the product. If the CEO really was a true con-artist, he would not have spent the money to work on developing ANYTHING, and just skipped town with the investors millions.

      Having seen the operation from the inside, I'd say the company is really trying to make the console, and that management is just makeing some (very) bad moves in the PR department.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    3. Re:I applied for a job with them by kfg · · Score: 1

      The employees were capable and intent on making the product.

      They usually are. Oftentimes they even soldier on trying to make a go of the company long after the scammer has taken the money and run.

      They rarely succeed.

      If the CEO really was a true con-artist, he would not have spent the money to work on developing ANYTHING, and just skipped town with the investors millions.

      Nonsense. To sell snake oil you at least need to manufacture snake oil. Some cons run for decades with a considerable amount of physical plant, investment and "R&D" by the con artist. The perpetual motion and "free energy" people are particularly good at this and often spend millions to keep the con going. Ponzi schemes actually rely on payoffs to keep going, as such payoffs build further trust in the scam.

      Having seen the operation from the inside. . .

      No, no, no. You were a job applicant and saw nothing from the inside. I've never had a job in my life that I even began to see the inside of until I'd actually been working there at least a month or two. In a technical company you'd have to be an idiot to show the actual inside of your operation to an applicant.

      In the case of a scam, however, what you get shown is a set piece, a staged (very likely without the knowledge of the "actors") situation to leave you with exactly the impression that they want to leave you with. Like, that's kinda the definition of "con."

      And while you're looking at that the other hand is palming something and putting in a secret pocket.

      You don't get to see that unless you are "inside" that secret pocket.

      KFG

    4. Re:I applied for a job with them by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      they have a sense of humor about all the press

      I hope they can still laugh when their sales figures come in.

    5. Re:I applied for a job with them by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      I am pretty good at reading people, and I have chatted with a bunch of the employees and managers there about what they were doing, where they needed to go, etc. and I didn't get any 'wierd vibes' of them. Have you ever had any interaction with them, other that following the Internet flamewar?

      You are obviously convinced that there is some sort of evil machelavian plot going on inside IL, and I know better than to try to argue with a tinfoil hat birgade member. Personally, I stand by my assessment that the management is just stupid and inept. Here's hoping you are correct so you can enjoy being right.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    6. Re:I applied for a job with them by kfg · · Score: 1

      I haven't said anything about Infineon.

      KFG

  56. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    Really, what started all this? Why did Kyle take the first shot?? Why IL, why not some other bullshit company? Seems like a self-boosting crusade, no? ??? Nicely done, Kyle [H]. ???

  57. Wierd, the original article was published by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    exactly one year ago.

    How is that for coincidence.

    So is infinium:

    1: Venture capital con
    2: Venture capital con - turned mediocre idea
    3: ex Venture capital con - playing straight and realising he has shafted himself
    4: A normal company trying to make a living in this crazy old world, but they suck ass
    5: all of the above
    6: Mixing Bestiality and gaming

    I say, this should be a pay per view IT soap opera. SOAP and Opera... gee those are already used widely in the IT industry.... so I guess it works! :-)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  58. The Phantom at E3 2004 by MrGeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw the Phantom at E3 2004. Played it for a little bit. I've never seen a system get that much of a poor reception anywhere, ever, by anyone. It was funny as hell to see them try to explain it crashing so much and they wouldn't show us the "cool things it could do" that they kept talking about. They did have the biggest individual booth of the show, though. Maybe they thought gamers had no standards?

    --
    John Pippin - Managing Editor, PsxNation.com
  59. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't know the background of a particular follow-up story then it's either probably not of much interest to you (because otherwise you would probably have noticed the original story) or you're definitely a "casual reader" in which case you're probably not the main target audience for the site.

    Besides, it's a matter of moments to search for further information via Google.

    Admittedly, the side-box containing "Related Links" on Slashdot is completely pants. I mean the following links were suggested for this story...

    Online Business Books
    all the details, straight from the court dockets
    More The Courts stories
    More Index stories
    More Games stories
    Also by CowboyNeal

    None of those are particularly relevant to this story.

  60. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an idiot.

  61. Poof! by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 1

    You know it's not good when their site displays "contact billing ASAP."

  62. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by toriver · · Score: 1

    It would seem that you
    have adopted someting of a Luddite mentality. It
    is people such as yourself which impede technical
    progress.


    You mean we go around smashing computers because they take away our jobs? Idiot, we are computer professionals, the computers give us jobs!

    Please read up on what a Luddite is.

    As for DRM, /. criticizes it because we are consumers, and "DRM" takes away consumer rights - so it's more like "Digital Rights Massacre" instead of "Management".

    Subscription based software delivery
    via high-speed data pipes *is* the future.


    No, it's one of many business models, and /.ers are pointing out that Infinium have faults in their business model. Are you saying you redefine "Luddite" to be someone who criticizes someone's business model? If you have a PC you can get subscription-based downloads today, without adding an extra semi-PC which is present in their faulty business model.

    The Phantom is a cross between a console without the console's advantages, and a set-top box without the set-top-box' advantages.

  63. What website? by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    All I get is a "this account has been suspended" message when I go to that URL.

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:What website? by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
      Well, it's one of two things:
      1. The site has been so throughly slashdotted it has exceeded not only its daily bandwidth cap but perhaps its monthly or even yearly cap. Maybe even the entire bandwidth cap of the company supplying it with connectivity, or
      2. Infinium got the site shut down somehow.
      Considering that when I tried it several hours ago and it timed out, the reason why becomes painfully obvious. Before pointing Slashdot at a site to be turned loose to be strip mined of bandwidth, perhaps we need to to find some way to protect its environment. (I don't know, the above phrase seemed funnier when I wrote it.)
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  64. Re:NO, NO, NO by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Again and again you've been asked for specifics. Once more: What are the clear unsubstantiated claims? Name one!

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  65. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by toriver · · Score: 1

    Who are you to say they can't have a system
    like this because of *your* political and economic beliefs?


    Are you for real? How does criticizing their business model equate to stopping their business?

    Or... maybe it's not just their business but your business? It's hard to tell with Anonymous Coward posters.

    mmm, subscription based gaming, hmmm, monthly
    fees. Where have I heard this before? Ummm, Ev...
    Ever... Everquest! Nah, it'll never work.


    So are you saying Sony is making their Everquest players put a sub-standard PC under their television and play there? Is the game only distributed online, and loaded over the network every time you play?

    Or, surprise of all surprises, do you play the game (most often installed from store-bought CDROMs) on your existing PC, possibly over a narrowband connection?

    Do you see how Everquest isn't at all relevant for the Infinium business plan?

  66. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, IL (an unknown company at the time) made some big claims about their product. But the whole operation was shrouded in mystery and no-one seemed to know what was going on. So [H] did some investigating, and found out some "interesting" stuff. End result was that IL sued them.

    Why did [H] write an article about IL? because they made huge claims and people were interested, that's why.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  67. Re:NO, NO, NO by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    HardOCP did a hatchet job on the CEO and Infinium threatened them legally, HardOCP then sued Infinium. Quite amazing really.

    What is amazing? Infinium threatened legal action, and HardOCP responded in kind. This is what you should expect if you threaten to sue someone. Mmmkay?

  68. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by LookSharp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look, I don't know if you have thought about it from this angle or not, but Kyle was doing something to protect not only the gaming industry, but also potential investors.

    When that article was posted 12 months ago, Infinium had burned through several million dollars in venture capital with nothing to show but some renders and a glossy page of marketing lingo. They were "quite anxious" to get their hands on another 25-50 million US dollars. And it was pretty evident to those who were trying to get info on the console that- not only was it vaporware, it was vaporware hawked by a guy with a really shady history of business dealings.

    Kyle's article, while written in a sophomoric style, was very enlightening. It was truthful and Infinium's complaint is that it chased away potential investors. Damn right it it did, and rightfully so!

  69. From the website: by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phantom website

    Infinium Labs, Inc. was founded by a management team...

    That's all I need to hear.

  70. WTF?? Re:HardOCP: Victory is you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the HELL can the first comment of the story be REDUNDANT????

    1. Re:WTF?? Re:HardOCP: Victory is you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      easy. if it was said in the story, it's redundant.

    2. Re:WTF?? Re:HardOCP: Victory is you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where was that said in the story? It was a joke about the bad foreign translation of some video game endings.

  71. Here's my two cents... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Originally Tim Roberts intended to bilk a bunch of investors by pretending to create a gaming console, spending the money, then getting out of dodge. As HardOCP has pointed out, he's done that before.

    However, the online gaming community took notice and started asking real questions, e.g., where is an actual product? What companies will actually be writing games? Etc.

    Suddenly Roberts had to prove to the investors, and to future investors that the console was real, so he was forced to hire Kevin Bachus, former Microsoft Xbox employee. And worse of all for Roberts, he was actually forced to create a real product.

    Now that the online gaming community has put Roberts in a spotlight, he is no longer free to lurk in the dark. Now he's forced to either admit it was a scam or to go forward and fail with an asinine business plan. Mmmm... I wonder what he'll do?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  72. RSS helps, too by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    I read via an RSS reader. Clicking the linky linky in the RSS summary to open the actual slashdot web page always opens the normal green page instead of the funky colored ones.

  73. Nice "We have been /.ed" message by djk001 · · Score: 1

    Now that message was to the point. You can almost hear James Earl Jones saying "This Account Has Been Suspended!" lol

    --
    The thing I like most about this job is all the rocket scientists who bang their mice on their desks shouting 'It Broke!
  74. Re:NO, NO, NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Using your +1 bonus should be for something useful, not the same thing you already said 10 times in the same story, also not for corrections to yourself and definately not for subthreads when only a few people are involved. I thought that point would be obvious but I guess not. You post the same thing over and over again and use the bonus everytime. THAT IS NOT BENEFICIAL to /. as a whole and makes you look like you have some point to prove for other reasons. That is the reason you are being accused of shilling. Posting the same thing over and over and using your bonus when not justified. You might as well just randomly post your hatchet response to various threads, it would have the same effect.

  75. IL secret Buisness Plan... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    1)Pretend to make something to get investor cash
    2)???
    3)PROFIT!

    Pretty simple really. Not the first nor the last.

    1. Re:IL secret Buisness Plan... by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

      Actually the patented Phantom Labs innovation was to skip step 2. That really speeds things up a lot.

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  76. Older Stuff got fixed yesterday by wizzy403 · · Score: 1

    Or at least that's when I noticed. There's now a "Older Stuff" slashbox. Check your perfs.

  77. Amusing dead-account message by bittmann · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's quite a stretch, CowboyNeal, somehow turning "This Account Has Been Suspended / Please contact the billing/support department as soon as possible." into "HardOCP Wins BIG against Infinium Labs". Maybe I don't have the right one-time encryption pad?

  78. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by madprof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are talking total shit.
    He did what many many journalists would do and investigated.
    I suggest you go learn about good journalism.
    I, for one, applaud what he's done.

  79. Re:NO, NO, NO by finkployd · · Score: 1

    Not everything Kyle posted was proven, that article was full of speculation. Amazing how easily some fanboys are led.

    Give me one example, since it is full of speculation that shouldn't be too hard right?

    Accusing me of being a fanboy does not change the fact that you are rabidly defending them every chance you get yet have failed to provide a SINGLE example to back up your claim of "hatchet piece speculation".

  80. Toms reviewed it i believe by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/game/20040518/gaming_ console-04.html

  81. Link to the orginal HardOCP article by dlapine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's the link to the orignal HardOCP article detailing their investigation.
    Link to Original HardOCP article
    This looks a good piece of investigative journalism by a website. Kudos to them for providing the public an unbiased set of facts.

    --
    The Internet has no garbage collection
  82. INVESTOR FRAUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone say investor fraud? FBI? SEC? Ass raped in prison?

    I think there are some more reasons that the judge wants to see all the documentation. If it shows that Roberts is benefitting directly from IL outside of corporate guidelines, there is going to be an Enron-esque shitstorm.

    1. Re:INVESTOR FRAUD by HarvardAce · · Score: 2, Informative
      If it shows that Roberts is benefitting directly from IL outside of corporate guidelines, there is going to be an Enron-esque shitstorm.

      Somehow I don't think that VC's losing 10-25 million dollars is quite on the same level as thousands of employees and investors losing billions upon billions of dollars.

      I don't want to say that the VC's who stand to lose their money on IL deserve what's coming, but they at least know (or at least should know) the risk of being a VC, especially when you are investing in a new company and haven't done any research on them. I am surprised that people will invest millions on a company without doing the research that HardOCP did, and I can't really feel sorry for those who did.

      Enron investors, on the other hand, were investing because they were employees of what they thought was a successful company and/or they believed all the documents that the company was filing with the SEC and the NYSE. To make matters worse, they were also misled (deliberately, in some cases) by their financial advisors, who were also looking to make a profit on the whole ordeal.

      Bottom line, while this is an unfortunate situation for the VC's who invested in IL, it is by no means even remotely comparable to the whole Enron debacle.

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  83. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    The original Luddites were opposed to specific technology - machines that threatened their jobs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite). When technology came along that forced them to adapt, instead they chose violent protest. Kind of a precursor to unions.

    I also disagree with your assertion that there are no true Luddies on slashdot. How often are GUI's maligned? Graphical interfaces are a huge advancement over the command line, in terms of information presentation and user interaction, yet you still have people who decry them. Flash can do things that DHTML can't, yet how often do you see people bragging about how they have it disabled? And don't get me started on the HTML purists. "HTML was designed for structure, not presentation" they chant, but can't see that capabilities and needs have progressed beyond that.

    In each of these cases you have a group that got used to a certain level of technology and way of doing things (command line, plain HTML), and don't want to go through the effort of changing when new technology comes along. Just like the Luddites.

  84. Dot com bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Timothy is still living in the pre-burst era. Start a new company, embezzle as much as you possibly can (last I heard, Timmy gets about $5 million a pop), then wait until the demograph disappears.

    It's not really fraud, so to speak. Natural Selection just favors the people who do not invest in crap like this.

  85. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Informative
    No, if it fails out of the gates, this will be the main reason why
    1. It costs $30 US / month to play, PLUS any fees for games you want to play on it.
    2. Multiplayer, if present, is online only, unlike other consoles, which allow you to play with friends
    3. It has no "killer app" games, it only runs PC games...
    4. ...but not PC games you already own. Oh no, you need to buy them again
    5. Although it is a PC, you cannot upgrade it. (Although this is true of any console, such as X-Box, you will continue to get games tweaked for the console. Not so here, new games for the phantom will continue to have higher and higher requirements, and will not be optimized)
    6. You don't install the games, they all stream from the IL server
    7. Even if your games are cached, you still need to authenticate with the IL server
    8. If your internet connection goes down, you cannot play games.
    9. Regardless of their claims, I don't see how they can possible stream such large games in the background as you play them. As Tom's Hardware pointed out, most games have all of their music and such in one big file, and it is quite difficult to only select the stuff you need for the current level
    Want a good point? If you can hack the DRM, you can get a pretty sweet Linux box for $199. Athlon XP 2500+, 256 MB DDR RAM, GeForce 5700 PRO, 40 gb HD. But even if they sell millions as a result of this, it will still go bad, because I bet they are eating a loss and hoping to make it back on subscriptions (And so will probably be quick to DMCA any hint of hacking it)
    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  86. Doesn't Matter by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    There's a Ventur Capitalist born every minute. And apparently they're easily swayed by flashy graphics and marketing hype. Even after the whole dot-com bust, you still see a lot of very unwise investments. You'd think that if someone were about to drop 25 - 50 million dollars on a company, they'd actually do some research first, but apparently all you have to do is show them a shiny brochure and they'll say "OK! Here's a check for a huge sum of money! Have fun!" Then all you have to do is know when to skip out of the country when everyone realizes that you haven't done anything for the past 3 years.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  87. All I Can Say Is... by MtbRocket · · Score: 1

    Hip Hip Hurray

  88. Mods: give parent -1 IE-compatible :P -nt- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text. no, seriously. stop reading! why are you even bothering, there's NO TEXT!

    Kids these days.

  89. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he's just a karma whore. Look at his posting history. He doesn't make one contribution to any of the discussions he posts to. He is a waste of oxygen and if you can find his address, I'd be happy to relieve the trees of having to produce it for him.

  90. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by orim · · Score: 1

    Subscription based software delivery
    via high-speed data pipes *is* the future.

    Yeah, that may be correct, but why does the Phantom have a phone line jack on the back? You're gonna be downloading a DVD's worth of stuff over a modem connection?

    --
    "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  91. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why IL, why not some other bullshit company?"

    Because IL has been one of the biggest bullshit companies in the history of gaming, and CERTAINLY was from the start. They only gained a shred of legitimacy when they suckered enough investors to BUY it.

  92. No mod problems here by marcus · · Score: 1

    I've already slapped a FP down and boosted an insightful today.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  93. Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone could sue 3d realms for the actual release date of Duke Nukem Forever

  94. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    Like I give a shit about Karma on /., guy! My posts seem to have plenty of responses and if I do say so myself, they are thought provoking.

    >>if you can find his address, I'd be happy to >>relieve the trees of having to produce it for >>him.

    I wasn't being a troll, I was being serious. I would hope your e-thugging goes well for you in the future, tho.

  95. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    You'd think the open market could take care of a shitty product with no backing. Don't you think that when people got ahold of it they could decide for themselves? Look at Daikatana - nobody was blasting it from day one and look what happened, oh so surprisingly :rolleyes: the market took it down 'cause it was bullshit. It didn't have some guy with what I guess he thought would mark out his place in gaming history and make an easy attack a startup company in an already difficult gaming market-place. We already knew it would most likely go the way of the 3D0 and the Philips CD+G system. My point here is that why did he feel he had to make it tougher for them? Gamers aren't big enough to call bullshit on their own? Seems like picking on an easy target for a little bit of publicity...

    Does nobody here think a little more than the above posters?? Try substituting IL and [H] for some other two entities - maybe iD and IGN for instance? Would that make things different?

  96. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by maddskillz · · Score: 1

    >>if you can find his address, I'd be happy to >>relieve the trees of having to produce it for >>him.
    You got told by someone who hasn't even been out of there mom's basement in the last 15 years!

  97. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what I'm talking about. We need to "protect" the gaming industry? From what?! The industry makes billions a year - you don't think the gamers can figure out for themselves in a matter of a few months if this thing is for real or not?

  98. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    If they're truly hucksters, it's gonna be friggin' obvious at product launch date. Let the gamers sink them, not self-serving "journalism". *rolleyes*

  99. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, I think protecting people (such as the press and people likely to make emotional and financial investments in video gaming interests) from shady people who show up with exciting marketing material. If society can avoid spinning gears for 12-18 months before the vaporous marketing is revealed for the truth, I'd call that a good thing.

    Truth was revealed to many people, I'm sorry if I made it seem like "the gaming industry needs to be protected." Is was trying to take a different approach the the benefit of Kyle's report.

  100. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by madprof · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they are truly hucksters they won't meet a product launch date!
    There was no commercial gain from this journalism worth the risk of getting it all wrong and making enemies of future industry players.
    It's good to see this sort of questioning in the games industry. Often journalists write trite fawning nonsense or rehash press releases.

  101. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by Lonath · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'll grant you that. There are people who use computers, but like to "use them the old-fashioned way, dagnabbit!".