Slashdot Mirror


The Incredibles Trailer Online

Ant writes "The Incredibles movie trailers are posted online. Here are the Big (20 MB) and Full-screen (30 MB) Quicktime Files."

175 comments

  1. where's the coral link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    damned editors


    (altogether, a poor attempt at /. stamdard humor)

    1. Re:where's the coral link? by croddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      something tells me yahoo can outrun coral...

    2. Re:where's the coral link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Akamai (which is what Yahoo uses) moves around 15% of the web's traffic. A couple thousand /.'ers downloading a 30 megabyte file isn't even going to show up as a bleep to them, as terrible as that may sound.

    3. Re:where's the coral link? by Black.Shuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're probably right, but I still think /. should start making a habbit of using caching technologies like FreeCache or Coral when linking to media.

      Slashdotting and the ensuing "/. KILLED MY SERVER!1" comments are, erm... funny and all, but it kind of defeats the purpose of a news web-site when links are posted in the full knowledge that they won't be available for very long simply because of the popularity of the news-site.

    4. Re:where's the coral link? by beaverbrother · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know, it took like 10 min to download on my 3 Mbit connection. (I can usually start playing trailers that big as soon as they start downloading)

    5. Re:where's the coral link? by isNaN · · Score: 1

      Is that why I am downloading in 10k/s on my 10mbit connection?

      I think they could use som help...

      --
      No, i don't like sigs...
    6. Re:where's the coral link? by uss_valiant · · Score: 3, Informative
      Is that why I am downloading in 10k/s on my 10mbit connection? I think they could use som help...
      The problem is that the /. story links directly to a specific content server of the global akamai network (mp3content03.bcst.yahoo.com). Normally, you would make a HTTP/... request to yahoo for the movie file. Akamai would check which content server is the best for your request (geographically, load, ...) and you would download the file from this specific, for your request at that time optimal content server.

      It's obvious that this single content server can't handle the total bandwidth/load of all /. requests for a 30mb file.

      Conclusion: Please don't link to a specific content server, but to the original website/URL.
    7. Re:where's the coral link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    8. Re:where's the coral link? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Slashdotting and the ensuing "/. KILLED MY SERVER!1" comments are, erm... funny and all, but it kind of defeats the purpose of a news web-site when links are posted in the full knowledge that they won't be available for very long simply because of the popularity of the news-site."

      But if we stopped slashdotting sites it um...well, it wouldn't be funny anymore.

      And who reads slashdot for the articles?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:where's the coral link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is a habbit something like a Hobbit? Sorry, couldn't resist! :)

    10. Re:where's the coral link? by Talez · · Score: 1

      Plus. My websites and the ones I'm responsible have a transfer limit. After that limit I pay cents in the meg for transfer.

      You can sure as hell bet I'll sue Taco's ass if he diverts a few hundred thousand hits my way without warning. And I'll win it too.

  2. Not News by gumbi+west · · Score: 2, Informative

    And have been up for a long time (a month?). Way to go Taco!

    1. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, at least three months. I watched in early June.

      It's now in theaters - saw it last night. It ran as a coming attraction before Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow/ (which was really quite good).

    2. Re:Not News by Weird+O'Puns · · Score: 1
      Exactly. I found the trailer from my harddrive and it has been there since May:
      -rw-r--r-- 1 myuser users 17939793 May 14 17:50 the_incredibles-tlr_m480.mov
    3. Re:Not News by Weird+O'Puns · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to myself, but the one I've got isn't the same as those just posted. I just didn't bother to check this before posting because Yahoo was so bloody slow. The title is still missleading[1] as the trailer has been online for months this is just a new one.

      [1] Surprise, surprise. This is /. after all.

    4. Re:Not News by jhagman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, AFAIK this is not the trailer that is on Apple.com/trailers, but a new one. So please watch the trailer before flaming.

    5. Re:Not News by vocaro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, there was a trailer available months ago, but it was more of a teaser. It introduced the characters, but that's about it. This one actually gives an idea of what the plot is about, and it has maybe 75% new scenes compared to the last one. And it makes me even more impatient to see the movie now, because it looks, well, even more incredible!

      Did you actually view the trailer that the article linked to, or did you jump to conclusions?

    6. Re:Not News by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Mod parent down. This is a new trailer that just came out.

      It only has a tiny bit of the original one where he's trying to get his belt on, but the rest is all new and well worth watching.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Not News by gumbi+west · · Score: 1
      the funny thing is that http://www.apple.com/trailers/ is not carying it as a new trailer.

      I have seen all the footage before, but i was also part of a focus group (got to a movie very early) so maybe it's all jubmled up in my mind.

    8. Re:Not News by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      There is also the 'where is my super suit' part and the begining red part, and more. but as I stated previously, I think I may have gotten this confused with some of the stuff I watched in a focus group, and by the fact that http://www.apple.com/trailers/ is not marking it as new.

    9. Re:Not News by timts · · Score: 1

      if this is wmv, rm or divx trailer, the size would be a lot smaller and quality would be better.

  3. Corel-link... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 0, Redundant
  4. Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by YetAnotherName · · Score: 5, Informative

    Elastigirl, who appears in this movie, was also the name of a superheroine (but with a hyphen: Elasti-Girl) in the DC Comics published Doom Patrol, an old comic from the 1960s. Her superpower: altering her size, not stretching parts of her body,

    OK, yes, I'm old. At least I'm not overweight and eating a rapidly congealing breakfast burrito ...

    1. Re:Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      She's also in John Byrne's (currently ongoing) revival of that series. I recommend readers to skip that and go directly to Grant Morrison's run from around fifteen years ago.

      The old silver age stuff is nice, too.

    2. Re:Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    3. Re: Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Elastigirl, who appears in this movie, was also the name of a superheroine (but with a hyphen: Elasti-Girl) in the DC Comics published Doom Patrol, an old comic from the 1960s.

      Oh, great. Now Disney is going to have to sue DC for stealing the character.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      If you're interested, DC is finally re-releasing Morrison's Doom Patrol in Trade Paperback form. The first volume, "Crawling from the Wreckage", was re-released last week. The second volume "The Painting That Ate Paris", is supposed to come out next week. I'm really glad they are coming out since I've been a Morrison fan for a long time, but I missed out on his Doom Patrol (I did read his Animal Man run at the time though, and loved it).

    5. Re:Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      OK, yes, I'm old. At least I'm not overweight and eating a rapidly congealing breakfast burrito ...

      "Oh, a sarcasm detector. Now there's a REAL useful invention..."

      *** Computer beeps faster and faster and then explodes ***

    6. Re:Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Her superpower: altering her size, not stretching parts of her body

      How about altering the size of parts of her body?
      THAT is a super power I want to see! : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Ah, sweet Elastigirl! by zonker · · Score: 0

      love the doom patrol? visit my 'doom patrol extravaganza' on my site. sorry about the plug, but it's something we've worked a lot on (and obviously still has lots of work to go)...

  5. Re:Another Pixar Hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The anniversary, much like the relationship, is a failure.

    First note of intent towards Kate.

  6. mirror by sinner0423 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Incredibles

    I'm not sure if the above link is the same trailer, but it's still good. The two links submitted in the article aren't even pumping out 10kb/sec @ 8am on a sunday morning.

    1. Re:mirror by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Both Yahoo and Apple use Akamai, which is ridiculous robust and virtually incapable of being slashdotted. More importantly though, since they're both part of the same network, there difference between downloading the file from yahoo or apple should be fairly trivial.

    2. Re:mirror by epicstruggle · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are different trailers. Get the one from yahoo for the latest trailer.

      me not you

      --
      "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    3. Re:mirror by rf600r · · Score: 1

      I agree that Akamai is ridiculous, but I'm curious to hear why YOU think so.

  7. Disney is going down by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Walt Disney Company has shut down its cel animation studios. Pixar will probably leave Disney after The Incredibles and Cars have completed their runs. There's trouble in Miramaxland. Now I know why Michael Eisner decided to get out in 24 months: there won't be a Disney left. What does survive of the company will assume a role similar to that of Cedar Fair, which runs a few amusement parks.

    1. Re:Disney is going down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      retarded

      the company will move in new directions without eisner, expect a new deal with pixar

      the worst it gets is someone like comcast buys them, takes all the content for broadcasting and sells off the parts

    2. Re:Disney is going down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ABC! They can't lose with that The Bachelor franchise.

    3. Re:Disney is going down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to tell you this, because I wish to god it wasn't true, but Pixar made up with Disney after they split with them, and made a new deal, because they were unable to find another publisher willing to give them a better deal than Disney would.

    4. Re:Disney is going down by synergy3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh BULLSHIT! Eisner is leaving when his contract is up. There are still those who want them out earlier. Miramax while hesitant to stick with Disney earlier will stick with Disney. Pixar may be wooed back now that Eisner has the exit in sight. Disney is a huge conglomerate and will not be going down anytime soon. Once they get someone decent to run the show, they will be a company on top again.

    5. Re:Disney is going down by AlphaJoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Walt Disney Company has shut down its cel animation studios. Pixar will probably leave Disney after The Incredibles and Cars have completed their runs. There's trouble in Miramaxland. Now I know why Michael Eisner decided to get out in 24 months: there won't be a Disney left. What does survive of the company will assume a role similar to that of Cedar Fair, which runs a few amusement parks.

      Man, you really are uninformed, aren't you? Disney has four original CG movies in the works, plus a few Pixar sequels in the works at Sequel Studios. Eisner is a driving force behind the fall of Disney...Eisner getting out? The faster the better, as far as I am concerned.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    6. Re:Disney is going down by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why would Pixar want to team up with Disney again? It's much more profitable for them to finally go on their own...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    7. Re:Disney is going down by tepples · · Score: 1

      Disney has four original CG movies in the works

      Given how mediocrely Brother Bear and Home on the Range did at the box office, what makes you think Disney's in-house writing will sell tickets?

      plus a few Pixar sequels in the works at Sequel Studios

      Three words: Direct to video.

    8. Re:Disney is going down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure as fuck hope so. Goddamn I hate that company with a passion.

    9. Re:Disney is going down by LikelyStory · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Yeah, Eisner's leaving, after trashing the place. That such a once-fantastically creative world and icon of Americana should have been put into the hands of such an imaginationless, no-talent goober was a tragedy. All he knew how to do was look good in a suit... Good riddance. Hope that Disney can recover.

    10. Re:Disney is going down by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      disney isn't just stuff you see the disney logo big in(cartoons).

      besides, why would they want to keep paying outsiders for when they can just setup their own shop(expertise in cgi isn't that small of a field as it used to be so it's no trouble)..

      couple of years ago one could have went to see something like the incredibles just because it was cgi, not anymore.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:Disney is going down by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      Go on their own? If they are shopping for other deals why would they be interested in going on their own? They want a bigger cut of the pie, but they still need someone with existing distribution channels. Pixar does not distribute.

    12. Re:Disney is going down by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Is it, though? The key here is distribution, and are any of the other studios really a better bet for distribution. Or are you suggesting they go it alone? If SKG didn't already have an animation area, that would be the best match - get in with some creative guys. Who says Fox, WB or Paramount will be any better than Disney?

      Even if there was some problems, that's resolvable. Pixar is in a renegotiating position, and quite honestly have a pretty strong hand. Disney have had how many giant hits since The Lion King?

      Saying all that, who's got the stores? Who's got the bigger name with the average households across the globe? Who's got the theme parks? Whilst we'd all like to think that big budget animation is more than for kids, that's not how most people see it.

      There's a time in the future, where I could imagine Disney, particularly from the kids animation side (which would hit the shops, theme parks etc.) being smaller than Pixar.

    13. Re:Disney is going down by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      plus a few Pixar sequels in the works at Sequel Studios Three words: Direct to video.

      I hate Disney's sequels with a passion.. but the bad news is that the direct to video sequels are very very profitable for Disney. They tend to cost just over $15m to make and regularly generate $50m+. Are they embarassing? Yes. Are they money-makers for Disney? Yes.

    14. Re:Disney is going down by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      And they run the finest swamp in the entertainment industry!

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    15. Re:Disney is going down by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Who says Fox, WB or Paramount will be any better than Disney?

      Well, at least Fox, WB and Paramount aren't complaining they can't make money on Monday Night Football. They also didn't dismantle an irreplaceable animation division with an 80-year heritage to save money.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    16. Re:Disney is going down by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      if that means we get an amusement park on par with Cedar Point then I'm all for it! Die Disney die!

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
  8. Elastigirl? by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who finds a superhero by the name of "Elastigirl" more than a little bit sexually provocative? I mean, honestly, there are just too many jokes that you could make about that.

  9. and over here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and over here at suprnova you can download full length/full-screen movies too!

  10. Huh? by iamdrscience · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is this news for nerds now? New movie trailers? I mean, come on, the fact that it's computer animated is no longer a novelty. Or is it that it's a Pixar movie and Pixar has an association with Apple?

    Oh well, I'd rather have posts like this that are somewhat impertinent than some of the recent slashdot posts that are completely unremarkable and/or stupid slashvertisements.

    1. Re:Huh? by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      and Pixar has an association with Apple?
      ...and Debian, but I agree, this isn't that newsworthy. Maybe the superhero genre itself is News for Nerds? I don't know.

      (Has there ever been a thread on /. where there's been no "is this news for nerds?" comments?)
    2. Re:Huh? by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny
      (Has there ever been a thread on /. where there's been no "is this news for nerds?" comments?)
      IIRC there was an article about which single tape is best for taping your broken black thick-rimmed glasses, patching your pocket protector in the event of a rip and holding your sliderule together just in case you were to accidentally trip (as many of us klutzy nerds often do) and break it. Nobody questioned that one.

      Although I don't see why you need to know what tape is best for repairing your sliderule as I would just use the spare one I carry.
    3. Re:Huh? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's not even too fresh of a trailer.

      watched it couple of days ago on apples site... I guess someone watched it just now and "omg wtf I didn't hear about this before so this is news news news news".

      well, it's not like it's 2 years old though so that's a plus..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Huh? by imroy · · Score: 1

      According to the timestamp on the file, I downloaded this back in early June. June! This is three months old! I thought a new trailer had been released, but no. It's just another f**king dupe! Guh!

  11. Answer by EdMack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes. I, for one, do not fantisize about elastic girls. I like real girls. Who can't fly.

    --
    puts ("Python r0cks\n");
    1. Re:Answer by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh I'm not saying I find the idea sexually attractive, I'm just saying that I think the idea is implicitly sexually incendiary, although I suppose the same is true for a male elastic superhero.

      On second thought, maybe this isn't a great road for discussion.

    2. Re:Answer by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      Indeed.......... there have been jokes about whether EVERY part of Mr. Fantastic's body is stretchable for about as long as the Fantastic Four have been around.

    3. Re:Answer by InfoVore · · Score: 1

      In the Marvel superhero universe, the guy with elastic powers is called 'Mr. Fantastic'. His base of operations: a giant skyscraper.

      Erotic symbolism in comic books? Nah....

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    4. Re:Answer by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the idea is implicitly sexually incendiary, although I suppose the same is true for a male elastic superhero.

      Stop beating around the bush and just say it: You miss goatse man.
      ;-)

      Ah DAMN, I grossed myself out...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  12. Saw the trailer at a showing of Sky Captain... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...last night. Looks pretty good, they have some fantastic comedy writers working for Pixar - you could almost believe they were English.

    The look and feel of the whole thing was great, however they seem to have backed away from their more and more realistic graphics and this one is 100% cartoon feel.

    This was then followed by a commercial for SquareBob in a movie theater that only admits over 21s (the Premium in Framingham, MA). D'oh!

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Saw the trailer at a showing of Sky Captain... by colmore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know about anyone else, but I'm over 21, and I'm certainly going to see the SpongeBob movie.

      If I ever get too old for quality absurdist children's entertainment, then well...

      Ah, I don't know what, but it isn't going to happen.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Saw the trailer at a showing of Sky Captain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I found really amusing was when they showed the Sponge Bob trailer before Fahrenheit 9/11. Talk about missing your target demographic...

  13. Ep III Trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't this the film that's rumored to debut the trailer for Star Wars ROTS?

    1. Re:Ep III Trailer by thatnerdguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder if Lucas realizes that his 6th star wars film can be called Star Wars ROTS?

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    2. Re:Ep III Trailer by zenneth · · Score: 0

      I somehow think we'd have heard about that, if it were so. Who knows... maybe the MPAA runs an NDA at the beginning that you have to swear not to reveal spoilers for the trailer by talking about the trailer, or you have to close your eyes and cover your ears. OK, probably not. Lucas isn't quite that weird... is he?

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    3. Re:Ep III Trailer by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      ROFL

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  14. i sincerely hope... by dioscaido · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... Shark's Tale crashes and burns, and the Incredibles triumphs in their wake. With the exception of Shrek, Dreamworks has been playing copy cat to Pixar. Pixar develops a Bugs Life, and -- what a coincidence -- Dreamworks releases Antz a few months before Pixar. Pixar develops Finding Nemo, and Dreamworks comes out with a Shark's Tale.

    They did so well with their only original idea -- Shrek. Given how lame ST looks in previews, I hope it spanks them into forced creativity.

    1. Re:i sincerely hope... by dq5+studios · · Score: 3, Informative

      Shrek was based on a children's book.

    2. Re:i sincerely hope... by EdZ · · Score: 1

      From the impression at the Venice Film Festival, Sharks Tale beats Finding Nemo into he ground.

    3. Re:i sincerely hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Antz beat A Bug's Life into the ground too.

    4. Re:i sincerely hope... by sgant · · Score: 1

      Beats it into the ground how?

      How does Sharks Tale compare with "Gone with the Wind"? How about "Citizen Kane"? Does it beat "Return of the King" also?

      How does one movie do anything to another movie until it's a satire or a spoof ala "Blazing Saddles"?

      Do you look at boxoffice results? Why? Do you have a stake in the movies on the lists? Who cares if one movie made more money or "beat into the ground" at the box-office another? It's almost like you people think it's a sporting event or something!

      It's just a movie. You like it, go see it. If not, don't.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    5. Re:i sincerely hope... by sahonen · · Score: 1

      I always thought Shrek was Dreamworks' version of Monsters, Inc. And I agree, ST looks lame.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    6. Re:i sincerely hope... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      With the exception of Shrek, Dreamworks has been playing copy cat to Pixar. Pixar develops a Bugs Life, and -- what a coincidence -- Dreamworks releases Antz a few months before Pixar. Pixar develops Finding Nemo, and Dreamworks comes out with a Shark's Tale.

      Yeah, I was discussing this kind of behaviour last wednesday.
      That shark thing looks like a "mee too" movie, don't it?

      I think its a culture thing though. Pixar is still new and it hasn't developped a thick crust of old timers who don't want to rock the boat, and Dreamworks is a relatively old company which has settled in its ways. They do what sells. I'm sure in 15 or 20 years Pixar will have lost its youthfull exhuberance.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:i sincerely hope... by cei · · Score: 1

      The annoying thing is that Dreamworks timed the release of Shrek so that the DVD came out on the same day Monsters, Inc. opened in theaters. And now, they're releasing the DVD of Shrek 2 the same day The Incredibles opens. It's like they think that by selling a DVD, people won't go out and see the competition's movie...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    8. Re:i sincerely hope... by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Shrek 2 sucked, it wouldn't keep me from seeing The Incredibles.

      What Pixar has that Dreamworks doesn't is good old fashioned storytelling. Pixar could make a good movie with sock puppets and a consumer camcorder if they had to, because they can tell a good story regardless of the technology used. They just happen to have some really good technical skill to back it up.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    9. Re:i sincerely hope... by furiousgeorge · · Score: 1

      >>I think its a culture thing though. Pixar is
      >>still new and it hasn't developped a thick
      >>crust of old timers who don't want to rock the
      >>boat, and Dreamworks is a relatively old
      >>company which has settled in its ways.

      WTF are you talking about? Pixar dates back to the mid-early eighties. They are about twice as old as Dreamworks.

    10. Re:i sincerely hope... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Pixar dates back to the mid-early eighties. They are about twice as old as Dreamworks.

      Huh, you're right. I just assumed, based on the sheer number of titles, that dreamworks was old.
      Though, my statement about old guys set in their ways is still my opinion on the matter, I apologise for stating an assumption like that without checking it or declaring it for what it is.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:i sincerely hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I apologise for stating an assumption like that without checking it or declaring it for what it is.

      This is /. It's what we do :)

    12. Re:i sincerely hope... by chgros · · Score: 1

      Pixar develops a Bugs Life, and -- what a coincidence -- Dreamworks releases Antz a few months before Pixar
      Antz and Bug's life were completely different (although with a similar "setting"), and I for one found Antz vastly superior (it was more directed to an adult audience)

    13. Re:i sincerely hope... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      You need to consider that computer animation is still struggling to produce realistic people, and Toy story had already been done.

      Incects were the next obvious choice. And did you even see both movies? 'A Bug's Life' is not only the weakest of Pixar's offerings, but a rip off of an existing story.

      Antz is quite good, a solid and engrossing story.

      I'm a fan of CG movies because they take so long to set up and render, so the scripts and scenes are gone over with a fine tooth comb. You may wish "Shark's Tale" flops, but the odds are in favor of it doing well.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  15. Skipping Commercials by mfh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Saw the trailer at a showing of Sky Captain...
    I tend to show up late enough to skip the commercials. It sucks because I miss previews but at least I don't have to put up with the commercials.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  16. Parent is a Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy it's been a while since I've seen the Harlequin baby photos. They don't bother me at all, but some people may be seriously disturbed...

  17. Are you on crack? by Sunnan · · Score: 1
    Although I don't see why you need to know what tape is best for repairing your sliderule as I would just use the spare one I carry.

    The thread was about which tape was best for all three of those purposes - flexibility as well as durability.

    I'd rather have just one sliderule (an RPN sliderule, of course!) if I can rely on a good tape.
    1. Re:Are you on crack? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Do you think Disney is just a few cartoon studios and some crappy theme parks?

      Well, they used to have a few cartoon studios until they fired everyone.

      Their movies and theme parks account only for a *small fraction* of their money.

      Lucky for them.

      While at that site check out some other megalopolies, you may be surprised at who owns what.

      Well, soon Disney will sell their stores and Monday Night Football. They've already lost both animation divisions, and now they're making movies about theme park rides. Disney isn't what it used to be.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    2. Re:Are you on crack? by tepples · · Score: 1

      ABC is in fourth place in U.S. free-to-air TV. This pretty much leaves ESPN.

    3. Re:Are you on crack? by multimed · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the great link, but I don't think that it is enough to disprove questioning Disney's future. Being large and even having huge revenues does not necessarily corrolate with making profits. I don't feel like taking the time to dig through the financials but how much of Disney's profits come from licensing and merchandising of the company's characters? I"m guessing a lot. They've shown a tremendous ability to continue milking old characters but at some point, failure to create successful new franchises will catch up with them. Most especially because in the past, they could weather storms due to not having any real competition. Now there are other studios turning out quality work with Disney's only real source of creativity recently, Pixar set to join the list of competitors. Not to mention due to in large part to dreadful stock performance the last 5 years, there's still major power struggles for company leadership and Eisner leaving soon, who knows what will happen.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
  18. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for pointing this out. You'll forever be labeled flamebait because you dissent, but that's the nature of communication in a police state. Anyone who stands up and asks why we're being fed certain information is immediately escourted from the room.

  19. I think I remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watching this trailer online at least several months ago, and saw the teaser online over a year ago last spring, all at apple.com/trailers... And then was it this summer that the trailers were shown in theaters? someone's must've been hiding in a very dark place for a very longggg time where the FTTB doesn't reach. poor person. poor poor person =p.

  20. Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it from here..
    http://24.190.28.108:6969/torrents/Incredi bles.mov .torrent?CD26763C7BFC0025C4F07DFF834D73F737EF852E

  21. Disney has to be scared. by gozar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the first time an animation company has come along that can create new and interesting characters and movies, without have to rehash old characters or make sequels. Eisner is hoping to lord over Pixar all the characters from Toy Story, Monsters Inc, etc. in the hope that Pixar will come back to Disney. It must drive Eisner nuts that Pixar doesn't need their old characters or movies!

    (BTW, I noticed Disney released another Lion King movie this past week.... It's time to stop beating a dead horse (or lion) and make some new stuff!)

    --
    What, me worry?
    1. Re:Disney has to be scared. by uwquazi · · Score: 1

      Funny that you noted Lion King is being re-hashed again, as it isn't very original from the get-go. Take a copy of Hamlet, make it "G", turn the characters into animals, and you have Lion King.

    2. Re:Disney has to be scared. by Fancia · · Score: 1

      First make certain to do it through the filter of Osamu Tezuka's Jungle Emperor.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    3. Re:Disney has to be scared. by beerits · · Score: 1

      Some also think the Lion King is a uncredited remake of Kimba the White Lion.

  22. Wow...must explain your commerical success... by FatSean · · Score: 0

    ...always giving the customer what they ask for. ass.

    --
    Blar.
  23. I'm 40 and I love spongebob by scotay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like all truly great cartoons, this one speaks to children and adults, often simultaneously. It has an excellent cast of fully-realized core characters and occurs in an undersea universe that has an odd (often arbitrary but strangely consistent) collection of rules that sometimes become part of the jokes (such as fires burning underwater). I particularly like how everything goes live-action whenever they go above the water surface and the odd live-action inserts. It may be pothead humor, but it works for this pothead.

    It sounds like you haven't watched any episodes. You should check it out. You may be surprised.

  24. the point? by clockwise_music · · Score: 0

    Maybe I've missed something here.. but remind me.. why exactly do we care again?

  25. 11kbps ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    yeah feel the pain yahoo !

  26. Now showing: by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

    The incredible slow downloads! Watch as Captain Slashdot crushes sites with his army of henchmen!

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  27. torrent here by keyshawn632 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Torrent is availabe via http://www.filerush.com/download.php?target=the_in credibles-tlr_m480.mov
    The bittorrent technology is vastly underused by the the media communities of movie trailers and game demos.

    1. Re:torrent here by keyshawn632 · · Score: 1

      Well, with the page also has this one
      http://www.filerush.com/download.php?target=incred ibles_tv_spots.zip
      as well, with TV Spots - 27 Mb's - with both direct http links and the torrent on it.

    2. Re:torrent here by FatalTourist · · Score: 0

      Arr, the trailer ye link to be an olden one.



      Say wha?

      --


      Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
    3. Re:torrent here by JimRay · · Score: 1

      This torrent is the OLD trailer, not the new one that debut the weekend of Sept 17.

      --
      My other computer is your Windows box
  28. I just don't get it by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

    Why don't the editors post a torrent link instead of direct link to a 30MB file.
    Don't they ever heard about the /. effect?

    Of course I still think each website should be mirrored by /. before being posted, but I wouldn't ask <sarcasm>that much</sarcasm>.

    1. Re:I just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      subject of parent says it all

  29. Astroturfers welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    you have been played sucker
    trailer = advert with a different name

    but i guess the movie industry need all the help they can get, who else is gonna pay the actors multi million dollar salaries if you suckers dont lap it up, its hard getting by you know

    oh and the animation looks awful in the trailer, pixar you say ? looks like something out of 3ds max on a weekend

  30. What are you on? by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 1

    You believe that Disney is declining without any indicative evidence of the fact? No sharp falling profits or revenue, Disneyland and Disney World still exceptionally strong vacation destinations? They're opening a Disney theme park in Hong Kong Really Soon Now(TM) to boot. From where is this paranoid speculation derived?

    --

    1. Re:What are you on? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Are they still "exceptionally strong"?

      What I want to know is how long they can last on age-old characters. What's the last non-Pixar character that was a big draw for Disney? Little Mermaid? Belle? Simba?

      Have they created anything of any worth since Katzenberg left?

    2. Re:What are you on? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      You believe that Disney is declining without any indicative evidence of the fact?

      Yes.

      No sharp falling profits or revenue

      Eh. Stock price is flat at best. Disney's in the middle of the pack for investment returns, and trailing the S&P 500. A playoff team they ain't. Losing Pixar just makes it worse.

      Disney stores are being sold. The animation division is out of business. Pixar is leaving. Miramax is unhappy. The theme parks are stale, with California Adventure particularly mediocre. Mickey Mouse is selling paper towels and ABC is giving up Monday Night Football. Yeah, I'd say Disney has done better

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    3. Re:What are you on? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Oh, and they apparently turned down Lord of the Rings claiming it was an "unviable project."

      Eleven Academy awards and a billion dollars at the box office are now "unviable" according to Disney.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  31. Re:torrent here - Not the full screen size by Graemee · · Score: 1

    The largest trailer size in the article is 30MB, the rush one was 17MB. But it is faster. I'm at 20kBs and rising.

  32. *yawn* old news by ailaG · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the trailer's been out for a few months now.
    old news.

    and since people were asking why this is related to /. : comics is geeky. this movie, as hollywoodish and "sticky kiddie animated" as it seems, is based on comics.
    frankly, i'd prefer news on the sin city movie (based on comics as well). but yes, i think comics is geeky enough.

    --
    -= ailaG =-
    1. Re:*yawn* old news by katanan · · Score: 1

      this is the new trailer that was just released, so er....not old news. darkhorizons has a link to it as well.

  33. p.s. remind me to think before i use slang from by ailaG · · Score: 1

    other languages :)

    sticky kiddie animated.. i meant animation for kids, which isn't just that but it's also made to be popular, rather than focusing on the quality.

    --
    -= ailaG =-
  34. Brad Bird! by May+Kasahara · · Score: 4, Informative
    I always look forward to Pixar's new movies, but The Incredibles is something extra special to me-- it's directed by Brad Bird, probably the best commercial animation director working in N. America right now. He really knows the medium of animation, and the level of acting (animation acting, not necessarily the voice kind) in the works he's involved in is superb.

    Check out The Iron Giant, Family Dog (if you can find it!), or even the early seasons of The Simpsons (on which he was a consultant) to see just how good this guy's work is.

  35. I mentioned the theme parks by tepples · · Score: 1

    Disneyland and Disney World still exceptionally strong vacation destinations? They're opening a Disney theme park in Hong Kong Really Soon Now(TM) to boot.

    I said "like Cedar Fair", where Cedar Fair is a company that runs theme parks such as Cedar Point.

  36. Mod parent up (was Re:where's the coral link?) by TimFreeman · · Score: 1

    Much better bandwidth by using that link. Thanks.

  37. Character Profiles The Villain by shadowmas · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the website check out the last character profile (the profile of the villain : Syndrome).

    It says :


    Primary Attributes:
    Super Villain
    Secondary Attributes:
    Extreme Wealth


    now who's the person that pops into ur head. was it was Mr. Bill Gates..... :)

    1. Re:Character Profiles The Villain by Hentai · · Score: 1

      While Jason Lee will probably do an admirable job, I would like to personally protest that they did not cast John Lithgow as Syndrome.

      I mean, COME ON people!

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  38. Re:Another Pixar Hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kate is a very sweet name for his Real Doll.

  39. P2P by island_tux · · Score: 1

    How Long Till Torrent and ed2k links are available ! Then they'll blame these networks for million $ loss :)

    --
    What Sig
  40. High speed mirror by rufus_the_stunt_bum · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is terrible slow, here's a mirror. http://kcore.ath.cx/mirror/7038600.mov Bandwidth provided by Admin-Networks.org

    1. Re:High speed mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

  41. It must be Sunday... by red+floyd · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're not boycotting the MPAA on Sundays.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:It must be Sunday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's "we?" This isn't a hive mind. Think for yourself, asshat.

    2. Re:It must be Sunday... by Stickerboy · · Score: 1
      We're not boycotting the MPAA on Sundays.

      Damn straight!

      Like any good religious folk, Sunday is the day to go worship, in this case at the Church of Commercialism. Make our tithes, bow to our idols, and so forth... The other six days we can go back to our normal selves, and unlike Baptists, we'll never meet in the liqour store...

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  42. It's the new Trailer by gpouliot · · Score: 4, Informative

    F.Y.I. The trailer is the second Incredibles Trailer. It's completely different from the first one and much more interesting..

  43. Mod Up Parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It deserves it. Good Trailer.

  44. Spoilers by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    Is that trailer spoiler-free? The previous one was full of it, so I heard..

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
    1. Re:Spoilers by jfengel · · Score: 1

      It doesn't give any real indication about what the story is about. It does give away a few apparent plot points, but not any story twists that I can tell. (Not having seen the movie yet I can't say if some of those moments turn out to be crucial plot points, but they don't feel that way). It's full of "moments", one-second vignettes that reveal a bit of character and tell a joke without telling you much about the story.

      So basically if you want to go into it totally unaware of how it's going to go, skip the trailer. Especially if you're already convinced you're going to see it. If you're looking for a good reason to see it, but don't want to know anything about it going in, well, there I can't help you. The marketing guys make the trailer to try to convince you to come see it, and they usually have to give away some of their A material to convince you that it's worth your eight bucks. In this case it doesn't look like they're giving you all the good jokes in the movie.

      And if I've spoiled the movie for you by revealing that it's humorous, I apologize.

  45. Re:Another Pixar Hit by aacool · · Score: 1

    Does anyone catch the parodies/tributes? Bond music, FF, the whole theme is itself a takeoff/tribute/filch from Alan Moore's the Watchmen & Busier's Astro City - now those are graphic novels I'd recommend over all franchised simulacra Should do well - Can't wait myself

  46. Re: Sponge-Bob by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    People forget (or may not know in the first place) that the voice of Sponge Bob (and I believe Patrick) are done by Tom Kinney who was part of the wonderfully subversive Mr Show comedy show on HBO a few years back (with David Cross, Bob Odinkirk, and Jack Black). Before it got cancelled, Mr Show produced some of the best sketch comedy in the last few years. Stories such as a musical about a man who has sex with a milking machine and the show ends with the machine singing "Auld Lang Syne".

    There are many parallels in the absurdism in each (with one being a more adult variety), something I think that appeals to all ages.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  47. Video Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like they want The Incredibles to be made into a video game; look at the bios of the characters. They have a bunch of cool super powers! Who wouldn't want to run around with those?

    1. Re:Video Game? by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      They are already making it into a video game...

      I think it was in an EGM (Electronic Gaming Monthly) a few months back that they had an article about it. Supposedly the game goes into more of what happens before the movie (before Mr Incredible turned into a fatass), than the movie itself.

      That's all I can remember, though.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  48. Re: Sponge-Bob by JRootabega · · Score: 1

    You're just saying that because he's got IDS.

  49. Re: Sponge-Bob by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    Why can't a man drink in silence? Why can't a man treat his wife with violence?

    Y'all been brutalizing me.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  50. How about a description? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WTF are the Incredibles, and why do they not even get a single paragraph description in the post? It might be nice for those of us that don't feel like downloading 20meg to figure out what this "story" is about.

  51. New trailer before Sky Captain movie! by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the new trailer before showing Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow movie.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. Original page... by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, it is from here.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  53. Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a direct link that you can right-click and save as.

    I've always hated playing movies in a browser window.

  54. Both new and nerdish = news for nerds. by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this news for nerds now? New movie trailers?

    New CGI superhero sci-fi movie trailers.
    Lets see, its new, so its news, and its CGI superhero sci-fi stuff, so its for nerds.

    Yup, meets the criteria of "news" "for nerds".

    Now go to the settings page and make some kind of arrangement that leads to you not having to see movie news on the front page and us not having to see your post complaining about them. Everyone wins.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Both new and nerdish = news for nerds. by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, it has been pointed out that the trialer is in fact a month old, therefore it is not new, or news. As for "stuff that matters", well, if you're a 9yo child, I suppose it does.

    2. Re:Both new and nerdish = news for nerds. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, it has been pointed out that the trialer is in fact a month old

      Arr, Really? I didn't check it out, I already want to see the movie, I therefore avoid all the latest trailers that show you as much of the movie's booty as they can.

      But, I was replying to a scallywag arguing that this wasn't "for nerds", not that it wasn't news. Because, it might not be news, but its definatly for nerds. I guess this is a slow news day, matey.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Both new and nerdish = news for nerds. by Mant · · Score: 1

      well, if you're a 9yo child, I suppose it does.

      One reason Pixar seems to be so succesful is adults really enjoy their movies too, they tell good stories and make good movies. Just about everyone in my IT department here at work is a Pixar fan.

  55. Where is my supersuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the one that says "Bad Muthafucka" on it.

    ob. PF quote.

  56. Not that anyone cares, but... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw a lot of folks mentioning that they could care less about this sort of thing. I agree, but to clear up some confusion...

    The trailer appears to NOT be available either on QuickTime or the movie website. There is a not-yet-activated third trailer link in the Flash animation on the movie website. I believe that the links provided earlier are that trailer.

    Honestly, the movie looks rather funny. I remember watching a documentary about how Pixar tackles CGI challenges in each of its movies. In Nemo, it was the realism of the water. Making it look like seawater with plankton and dirt and silt and stuff. Making water look realistic on the fish scales. Stuff like that. Monsters Inc. was all about getting the fur on the blue monster to look like...well...real fur.

    They mentioned, in the documentary, that the next film (I would assume that The Incredibles is the one in question) would deal with animating people and more realistic human environments. From what I can see, the characters are cartoony, but they do have much more expressiveness and character than the human characters from movies like Toy Story and Monsters Inc.

    Oddly enough, if you think about it, that CGI-based Final Fantasy movie from a few years ago seemed to really capture some human-like realism, and Lucas has done it a little with his prequels. The comment from the documentary made me wonder what Pixar was really getting at with their technology development goals.

    IronChefMorimoto

  57. Are you on crack? by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you think Disney is just a few cartoon studios and some crappy theme parks?

    Their movies and theme parks account only for a *small fraction* of their money.

    I suggest you educate yourself as to how big Disney is. While at that site check out some other megalopolies, you may be surprised at who owns what.

  58. Digital Cable... by applef00 · · Score: 1

    For those of us lucky enough to have Comcast digital cable, the trailer went up on On Demand friday night as well. So there you go. Avoid the download lines.

  59. No Spoilers In my discusson of Spoilers by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

    What did you think of the teaser trailer? I call it "In the Attic". It's pretty much one scene, one character, contextual background presented in scenery. If you want a feel for the animation with only a small bit of movie context, this is the only one I'd recommend.

    The first trailer (with the "pixar" city flyover opening) had many of these single character scenes edited together in a frenzied collage. The only direct indication of the plot I get is if I start speculatively assembling the pieces in my own mind. I count only three one-liner jokes that I'll be expecting (i.e. may still be funny but not suprising). There's very little we see of the plot though to put this stuff into context, but it's edited into a fast paced frenzy.

    The second and newest trailer which opens with "car trouble" opening has much more in the way of plot and characterization points. Some of my speculative assembly of the pieces I made of the first trailer was incorrect. It seems that the point of this trailer is to indicate that this won't be a typical superhero movie. There's very little focus on the antagonists, but many subtle character quirks are given a lot of focus.

    I'd call the teaser (in the attic) to be spoiler insignificant. The first trailer (pixar city opening) to be an adrenaline rush to get kids excited and has some characterization spoilers. The second trailer (car trouble opening) is a pitch to the adults of the kids that this movie will be fun for you too and has some plot and many characterization spoilers.

    Watching any preview reveals something about the movie. I hope this gives you some idea of what you might expect if you're up at two in the morning and just breakdown and have to see something.

  60. BitTorrent mirror of large version of new trailer by hbmartin · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a BitTorrent mirror of the large (30MB) version of the new trailer (not the old one):
    http://demonoid.com/download/21729/The_Incredibles _Trailer_2_large.torrent

    --
    Karma: Bizzare (mostly affected by varying internal caffeine levels.)
  61. Old farts at Pixar by brodin · · Score: 1

    >I think its a culture thing though. Pixar is still new and it hasn't developped a thick crust of old timers who don't want to rock the boat,

    Surely you must be joking! Pixar has Ed Catmull and John Lasseter who, while towering talents, are not exactly young. Ed is about as crusty as one can get in computer graphics and he is STILL the man (Catmull-ROM spline anyone)!

    I think it is that Pixar is just more creative and they are far more story/character focused than Dreamworks. That's Lasseter's contribution.

  62. Want to Avoid Spoilers? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1
    If you want to see more on The Incredibles, but minimize the spoilers I might suggest looking at the "Sneak Peak" clips on the Pixar website:
    • Clip 1 - Varied content mentioned below.
    • Clip 2 - Five sentence plot summary.
    • Clip 3 - Talks about an actor who's had parts in the Pixar movies

    I think these were the clips that were shown just before three of the commercial breaks in the television airing of "Toy Story". If you want them in chronological order I think it was Clip 3, then Clip 2, then Clip 1.

    The animation is rough. Very rough. You can see that some of the characters have undergone some design refinement so you can probably count on very little of what you see as something that will definitely be in the movie.

    Clip One has the most potential for spoilers. It also has the most material from the movie itself rather than people talking about the movie. Here's an intentionally vague and rough description of the content:

    • Character delivering two word line to another character indicating self-assurance.
    • Behind the scenes view of render station. Very rough render of an action scene. Unable to determine OS or Window manager being run.
    • A character not shown in other trailers or clips delivering a two word line of either brown-nosing or self-assurance. The impression is of a toss-away extra or practice animation.
    • Low resolution, limited movement, oddly lit scene of two characters in possibly dangerous situation.
    • A character gives a look of self-assurance to the camera. No lines.
    • A character face extpresses a determined effort to do something, but the context is unclear.
    • A voice actor shown in the recording studio recording a two word line. The voice is similar to a character in the promos. The line has no context other than a vague expression of urgency in the actor's voice.
    • Some black and white storyboards shot from a distance. On pause you can vaguely make out some superheros using their powers.
    • A different voice actor recording a 4 word line indicative of impatience.
    • A character's face demonstrating unexpected suprise.
    • Two characters sitting and watching something vaguely antrhopomorphic that appears to be vaporizing/disappearing/teleporting.
    • A voice actor shown recording a ten word line (used in the two trailers) indicative of a self-assured attitude.
    • Eight very fast (under a second) shots of characters in motion (and various stages of finished/rough animation)
    • Actor saying nine word line indicative of either self-confidence or boredom (no context). This voice actor hasn't had lines in other trailers, but some posters in studio indicate what character this actor may play (not sure if that's a spoiler or not).
    • An eight second assembly of different scenes. It is apparent that beyond a perhaps thematic relation, most of these are shown out of context. A conversation between two characters dominates the soundtrack which may or may not be a composite of different conversations.
    • A character concluding one of the lines started by one of the voice actors. In context it may indicate slightly different gender roles (or his perception of gender roles) in the superhero universe.
    • Five word line from one character indicative of suprise and frustration. May reveal a plot point not mentioned in other trailers but hard to tell not knowing who she is talking with.
    • A one word reaction shot from a character indicating possible emotional immaturity being juxtaposed with the previous scene, but may be out of context.
    • Concludes with a number of rapidly changing scenes of superheroics and superpowers.
    • After a John Ratzenberger wrap up, a gadget parodying a popular superhero prop appears as t
  63. You're kidding? by Wolfkin · · Score: 1

    Fullscreen on what? A PDA?

    --
    Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
  64. You talking about ESPN? by tepples · · Score: 1

    disney isn't just stuff you see the disney logo big in(cartoons).

    Besides the movie studios and the theme parks, what is there to Disney other than ABC (which is dying) and ESPN (which may not be)? Watch DIS go down, watch Comcast make a more gradual takeover attempt, and then watch the fireworks.

    besides, why would they want to keep paying outsiders for [CGI] when they can just setup their own shop

    Because the outsiders can write better movies. Brother Bear and Home on the Range didn't do so hot, and it wasn't just because they were cel animated, as all the CGI in the world can't save a movie whose script is subpar. Finding Nemo would have worked just as well had Pixar cel-shaded it instead of using a photoreal style.

  65. Fantastic 4 Ripoff? by JMandingo · · Score: 1

    I thought the trailer looked fun, but I did note that the powers of the family members were too similar to the Fantastic 4:

    Dad == strong/invincible == Thing
    Mom == elastic == Mr. Fantastic
    Daughter == invisible force fields == Invisible Girl (after she got her force field powers)
    Son == speedster != Human Torch

    Ok, but 3 out of four, come on!

    --
    Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
    1. Re:Fantastic 4 Ripoff? by rwhamann · · Score: 1

      Yes, and what about that other ripoff movie, Galaxyquest? I mean, the captain was always after the ladies, just like Capt Kirk! and the comm officer was so hot, just like Uhura!

      Who are they kidding, they are so ripping off Star Trek.

      --
      seg fault
  66. Full Screen? by Y2 · · Score: 1

    Full screen my asset! It's 640x272. A bit small on my 1440x900 laptop screen ...

    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  67. Ah, sweet Grant Morrison! by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    IMHO, his Doom Patrol run is his best work. I didn't like his (albeit great) Animal Man run as much as I liked Milligan's or Delano's, but his Doom Patrol run rivals my other favourite comic (Milligan's Shade the Changing Man v2) and might even be number one. I'm also fond of the second and third volume of The Invisibles.

    Thanks for the TPB tip, very much appreciated.

  68. Re: Sponge-Bob by Basehart · · Score: 1

    "People forget (or may not know in the first place) that the voice of Sponge Bob (and I believe Patrick) are done by Tom Kinney"

    Just for the record, it's SpongeBob and Tom Kenny.

    My wife knows him from way back and I met him just the once at the HBO Aspen Comedy Festival a few years ago.

    His current gig as the voice for SpongeBob SquarePants has got to be the number one voice gig in the universe.

  69. Music by Antagonist77 · · Score: 1

    The music is "United Future Organization - The Planet Plan" Just FYI

  70. Re:BitTorrent mirror of large version of new trail by CptNerd · · Score: 1

    But only for members, apparently

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  71. mr. incredible looks like ballmer? by irfco · · Score: 1

    kind of sick. i will not be able to watch the movie without thinking of that ballmer 'rampage speech' video. sad.