Slashdot Mirror


100 GB Email Account

soccrates writes "An article on Toms Hardware describes a Californian company giving out 100 GB email accounts to its customers. They even extended a challenge to get the first user to completely fill up the account, the winner getting a 1 terabyte account ! "

410 comments

  1. wtf ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here, move along.

  2. Slashdot Effect by typobox43 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Slashdot could easily fill this mailbox. If everyone switches their email address to one of these mailboxes, the viruses and spambots would certainly do the work for us.

    1. Re:Slashdot Effect by igny · · Score: 1

      Is oldwarez:oldwarez functional there?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Slashdot Effect by alchemistkevin · · Score: 1

      solicited emails from p0rn sites, you mean?

    3. Re:Slashdot Effect by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      What if we see the return of the old AOL-warez-sharing-via-email scene. One person uploads, then forwards parts as attachments to accounts on the same system. Deliveries should be local so no necessary re-uploading on the sender part. And distributing would take no time at all. 100 gigs would be peanuts.

  3. what else? by gshub77 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Pron of course just like everyone else.

  4. But is it a . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gmail account?

    1. Re:But is it a . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, will I need an invite to get one?!?

    2. Re:But is it a . . . by cyberzephyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gmail account?

      No it's not...

      Just remember, there can be only one.

      --
      I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    3. Re:But is it a . . . by Mithrandir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Always two there are, Master and Apprentice.

      --
      Life is complete only for brief intervals in between toys or projects -- John Dalton
  5. Ugh by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't even imagine how much time you'd have to spend finding unique porn mailing lists to get enough spam to fill one of these babies up. You'd see so much T&A that sex would be just... boring....

    1. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't even imagine how much time you'd have to spend finding unique porn mailing lists to get enough spam to fill one of these babies up. You'd see so much T&A that sex would be just... boring....

      Amateur.

    2. Re:Ugh by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "attachments in sizes up to 500 MByte."
      Anyone with an archive of, say, video files on around 24 DVDs (or a dozen DL DVDs) and access to a nice fast link could fill 100Gig in an afternoon.
    3. Re:Ugh by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be hard at all to code up something that just generated 20 500mb files of random bytes.....

    4. Re:Ugh by div_B · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be hard at all to code up something that just generated 20 500mb files of random bytes.....

      But could you do it ten times?

    5. Re:Ugh by Chiisu · · Score: 0, Redundant

      what is this sex you speak of? ;)

    6. Re:Ugh by Progoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      you mean something like

      for i in `seq 20`; do dd if=/dev/random of=file$i bs=5M count=100; done

      ?

    7. Re:Ugh by mog007 · · Score: 1

      You'd see so much T&A that sex would be just... boring....

      HEFF?! IS THAT YOU?!

    8. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is this sex you speak of? ;)

      Female.

    9. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently you've never tried to cat /dev/random. That's going to take a looooooong time to fill all that space.

      Your better bet is to use if=/dev/zero (much higher throughput), or take a small random sample and repeat it.

    10. Re:Ugh by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      I can't even imagine how much time you'd have to spend finding unique porn mailing lists to get enough spam to fill one of these babies up.

      Simple. Write a script to download every post from all of the alt.b* groups and u/l the files to your account as attachments.

    11. Re:Ugh by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Or create 1 and then copy it 19 more times!

    12. Re:Ugh by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

      or use /dev/urandom which is psudo-random numbers but will give you as many as you want.

    13. Re:Ugh by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Maybe he enjoys moving his mouse around for hours and hours nonstop.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    14. Re:Ugh by Electrum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyone with an archive of, say, video files on around 24 DVDs ... 100Gig

      The site in my sig currently has 832 GB in 237 DVDs.

    15. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting technique. Anyone know what the usenet daily traffic is these days. I'm guessing TB.

    16. Re:Ugh by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      could fill 100Gig in an afternoon
      Sorry to spoil the fun, but you would sure need a heck of a lot of bandwidth to do that. Home DSL/Cable connections are de-facto excluded here.

    17. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be even easier. Send an email of a picture to yourself, than massmail it to yourself with a massmailer program. No problem.

    18. Re:Ugh by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Home DSL/Cable connections are de-facto excluded here.
      University connections aren't.
    19. Re:Ugh by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Well, not all universities provide such connections. Even at 10Mbps, it would take around 22 hours to transmit that kind of data. Definitely more than an afternoon. Assuming no one is transmitting anything in the meantime of course. And assuming you can sustain a 10Mbps stream for 22 hours.

      I know a lot of universities that don't even have that kind of connection.

      In summary, I doubt it can be done from most universities.

    20. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK Universities 100MBit is used and not uncommon in halls. So it would easily be possible.

    21. Re:Ugh by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Informative

      The site in your sig currently has nothing but a few dozen cheap referer-style links to pay sites.

      http://www.empornium.us/
      http://www.thehun.com/
      http://www.madthumbs.com/

    22. Re:Ugh by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      100MBit zwould be the speed of your network, for sure, but what would the speed of your internet connection be then?

      I find it hard to believe. If it is true, then it is for the best.

    23. Re:Ugh by nacturation · · Score: 1

      My server's on a 100Mbps connection, and yes, I can use up the full 100Mbps (it's on a gig backbone). You pay for the bandwidth cost, I'll send the emails. Heck, given that the winner gets a 1TB email account on a dedicated server, this might even be worthwhile!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    24. Re:Ugh by TCM · · Score: 1

      Maybe he has a hardware PRNG like Intel's 865 chipset.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    25. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you own Swordfish. No self-respecting slashdotter would buy that!

    26. Re:Ugh by Toresica · · Score: 1

      Anyone with an archive of, say, video files on around 24 DVDs (or a dozen DL DVDs) and access to a nice fast link could fill 100Gig in an afternoon.

      That's what filesharing is for...

    27. Re:Ugh by dan14807 · · Score: 1

      /dev/urandom

      $ man urandom

      Not as fast as /dev/zero, because it still takes some CPU time to compute those pseudorandom values, but much faster than /dev/random.

    28. Re:Ugh by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      Anyone with an archive of, say, character devices and access to a nice fast link could fill 100Gig in an afternoon.

    29. Re:Ugh by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "Anyone with an archive of, say, video files on around 24 DVDs (or a dozen DL DVDs) and access to a nice fast link could fill 100Gig in an afternoon."

      Afternoon means 12:01 until dusk. Where I live (Tucson, AZ), sunset is at 18:09, so I'd say dusk would be around 17:45. Let's say 18:01, just to get a nice round number and to get a best case scenario.

      8 hours * 60 minutes * 60 seconds = 28,800 seconds
      100GB * 1024 * 8 = 819,200Mb
      819,200 / 28,800 = 28.44Mbps upstream bandwidth required. Oh yeah, don't forget about protocol overhead.

      I think you mean that anyone with 100GB of data and more than say, 28.5Mbps of upstream bandwidth could fill 100GB in an afternoon.

      -Lucas

    30. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pedantic asshole

    31. Re:Ugh by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Sorry to spoil the fun, but you would sure need a heck of a lot of bandwidth to do that. Home DSL/Cable connections are de-facto excluded here.

      Simple. Upload just 1 large 500 hundred MB file and then forward it to yourself 200 times. BAM! 100 GB

    32. Re:Ugh by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

      18-12=6

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    33. Re:Ugh by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      You had to post this just as I was about to start my homework? *sigh*

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    34. Re:Ugh by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      OMFG, I can't believe I did that. lol

    35. Re:Ugh by Electrum · · Score: 1

      The site in your sig currently has nothing but a few dozen cheap referer-style links to pay sites.

      Actually, it's to a single pay site (http://www.porndvddirect.com/) that does in fact have 832 GB in 237 DVDs.

  6. Big mailboxes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    YAWN

  7. That's easy by magiluke · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm sure I could fill that up with a simple script, but then again, I'm also sure that someone else has already done it... Oh well...

    --
    -Magiluke

    Earl Grey, Hot.

    1. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for i in `seq 1 10000`; do
      dd if=/dev/hda count=10M | mail ....
      sleep xxxx
      done

    2. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Create an undetictable worm so that thousands of users email you at once. That should fill it up in a few minutes.

      Who said worms couldn't serve a useful purpose?

  8. *Sigh* by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It appears that Google has started the email equivalent of a penis contest. First they came along with 1 GB...then MSN with 2 GB...and now this.

    1. Re:*Sigh* by typhoonius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, they've forced other free e-mail providers to compete, and the consumers are benefiting.

      What a rip.

    2. Re:*Sigh* by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How are they benefiting, exactly? On a practical level, a terabyte-sized email account isn't really any better than a gigabyte-sized one. Anyone who needs an account that big probably runs their own.

      I'm not attacking Google for coming out with the initial 1 GB service; I'm attacking the idiots who feel they have to outdo it as an advertising gimmick.

    3. Re:*Sigh* by Red+Alastor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are benifiting before they were getting 1 mb from hotmail and 4 from yahoo (6 for those who had an account since some time). Google with it's offer made all the other companies offer enough disk space for everyone.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    4. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What happens to all the consumers that use one of the gimmicky new webmail accounts that goes out of business or loses emails because they don't have backups?

    5. Re:*Sigh* by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I'll be very surprised if MSN ever actually implements a 2GB quota. They couldn't even handle the 200MB or whatever pie in the sky number they said people would be upgraded to. It's all just a marketing ploy with no intent to deliver. And besides, who really needs all that space just to hold the huge amount of spam that hotmail sends to its own users?

    6. Re:*Sigh* by slyckshoes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but fortunately (or unfortunately?) penises aren't growing at the rate that mailboxes are. Size is good up to a point, but a 1Tb penis would make it hard to walk. It would have to be on a dedicated server, so to speak.

    7. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is bigger than yours.

    8. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A walking hard-on.

    9. Re:*Sigh* by suckmysav · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You would have to be a complete knob to keep anything important in a free webmail account.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    10. Re:*Sigh* by slarshdot · · Score: 5, Funny

      soon I will be releasing my email service which will allow u to store 1 million bytes!!

      muwhaha!!

      --

      I'm not out of order! You're out of order! The whole freaking system's out of order!
    11. Re:*Sigh* by Council · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly, the solution is 1TB of email explaining how to make our penises grow fast enough to keep up.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    12. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The people distributing porn on these rediculously large accounts are benefiting.

    13. Re:*Sigh* by sexecutioner · · Score: 1

      All they have to do is store one copy of each spam email. Individual user inboxes just store a link to the content, thus it seems like they have 2GB. :)

      Hey, it's low and it's sneaky, but it's what I'd do!

    14. Re:*Sigh* by bot24 · · Score: 0

      Benifiting? I have at least 30GB available, and I cannot think of a way to use it all without accepting a few 10GB attachments. Seriously, why would anyone read even 1GB of mail? To put things in proportion for you: a standard novel of more than one hundred pages is between 200KB and 300KB. 100GB is more email than any one person could possibly want.

    15. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think Google or this will actually give ALL consumers the amount of space they promise? Nope.

    16. Re:*Sigh* by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      Good point, but anyways man about your sig, don't worry we already do.

    17. Re:*Sigh* by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1

      Size is good up to a point, but a 1Tb penis would make it hard to walk. It would have to be on a dedicated server, so to speak.

      Which would solve the problem of moving about with such a large penis. Now for the next problem... ...just what size woman are you going to stick it into?

    18. Re:*Sigh* by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      If you set it up right it might actually not be that bad of an idea. You could use something like GmailFS but able to mount your Gmail acount(s) and also simultaniously make identical backups at MSN and another random host. Then you'd have 3 up to date backups in 3 different places with 3 different companies, and once its set up it all runs behind the scenes. Could be alot easyier/better protected/cheaper than keeping it on CD's, tapes, or your hard disk, as long as it's not anything that you wouldn't wouldn't mind someone being able to see at least.

    19. Re:*Sigh* by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      There are, of course, privacy considerations as well.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    20. Re:*Sigh* by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, they've forced other free e-mail providers to compete, and the consumers are benefiting.

      What a rip.


      Benefiting how? Would you really make more use of 100 GB than 1 GB? What they do is just increasing "the number that matters" to sell their product. Notice how they aren't at all adding any other of Gmail's features. That's because it was only the account size that got attention when Gmail was introduced, so they ignore other things, because they don't really care for their customers, just to sell their product.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    21. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No worse than a for-pay webmail account. I've had more for-pay providers (@home, etc) go under than free (yahoo, hotmail) ones.

      Any webmail account without a backup for your emails somewhere else is stupid.

    22. Re:*Sigh* by kyrre · · Score: 4, Informative

      Heh. Even .Mac upped their accounts from 15mb to 250mb. (shared with iDisk). Thanks a bunch Google.

    23. Re:*Sigh* by Aerion · · Score: 1

      Benefiting how? Would you really make more use of 100 GB than 1 GB? What they do is just increasing "the number that matters" to sell their product. Notice how they aren't at all adding any other of Gmail's features. That's because it was only the account size that got attention when Gmail was introduced, so they ignore other things, because they don't really care for their customers, just to sell their product.

      This sounds rather like AOL with its free hours, doesn't it? When they realized they couldn't legitimately give out more than 744 free hours per month, they extended the free trial to 45 days. Never mind that internet access is rarely charged hourly these days, it's the big number that really counts.

      1099 hours of free Internet access? Whoohoo, how can I lose!?

    24. Re:*Sigh* by OriginalChops · · Score: 0

      The bikers are perhaps overcompensating for something?

      I mean its not enough to have huge bikes....

      At the end of the day I would pay double that to get a 500Mb E-Mail account with an effective Spam filter! I mean, if I don't get ANY Spam my inbox would shrink to 1/10th its size.

      Brings a whole new meaning to "It's not the size, it's how you use it"

    25. Re:*Sigh* by XemonerdX · · Score: 1

      Remember, it's not the size that matters, but what you do with it... or so I've heard...

    26. Re:*Sigh* by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      Don't worry Carnivore see's it all anyway.

    27. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now for the next problem... ...just what size woman are you going to stick it into?

      not into, through.

      OTOH, each chromosome has ~150x10^6 nucleotide pairs, *23 chromosomes, *2 to convert from base 4 to base 2... 13.8 Gb = 1.725 GB in each sperm cell. If you've got at least ~600 sperm cells then you've already got 1 TB swimming around down there. And that's not counting the cells that make up the rest of the delivery system.

    28. Re:*Sigh* by Dusabre · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would also need a dedicated client with a modified female port the size of a SUV. Which brings to mind a blue whale which I don't find appealing.

    29. Re:*Sigh* by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      If you encrypted everything before you sent it out you could keep it private too, the keys would never have to leave your box.

    30. Re:*Sigh* by Da+Web+Guru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, you just have to be a normal (i.e., non-slashdot) user. People store anything and everything in their free email accounts, from email/web site logins and passwords to their only copy of their email/phone contact lists.

      --

      --guru

    31. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some of the paying accounts have already been converted to 2gb. however, there have also been glitches in the switchover (accounts marked as 2gb accounts but only provisioned for 25mb, etc), and those have to be fixed before widespread changes are made.

    32. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could offer everybody a pentabyte (sp?) of storage and it won't be any different than offering everybody 10megs.

      I had that stupid 2meg hotmail account that I ignored for all these years because when it reached the 2meg limit of spam, it decided to delete old emails I had saved to make sure I saw the spam.

      On my yahoo account I had kept it around 5-6megs. I'm not going to use more than 10 megs I can bet.

      So size is realitevely unimportant past a certain point. I don't think too many users will use more than 25 megs in their lifetype. Sure there will be the super users using 100gigs, but there will be plenty of grandparents using 1-2 megs to average it down to a silly amount.

      Just because they offer me a gig doesn't mean they need to set aside a gig of hard drive space for me.

    33. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.725 GB in each sperm cell. If you've got at least ~600 sperm cells then you've already got 1 TB swimming around down there.

      True; but (biological technicalities aside- IANA qualified biologist or anything of that ilk), those 600 sperm cells contain copies of the same data, so the question is essentially the same as "if you have 1 CD-R and 599 backups of it, can you really claim to have 600 CD-Rs worth of data?".

    34. Re:*Sigh* by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      soon I will be releasing my email service which will allow u to store 1 million bytes!!

      Can't imagine why anyone would need more than 640k!

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    35. Re:*Sigh* by Loligo · · Score: 1


      Actually, I filled my gmail account a couple of times.

      Then again, I was a member of a super-mega-top-secret music ring from another web-log-type commmunity that dumped a gazillion songs a day into my shit.

      But once I found the "delete forever" option, all was forgiven.

      -l /don't ask, won't tell

    36. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are benifiting before they were getting 1 mb from hotmail and 4 from yahoo (6 for those who had an account since some time). Google with it's offer made all the other companies offer enough disk space for everyone.

      Competition is always good. Especially competition who brings new ideas (or features or benefits) to the table. My 6 MB Yahoo account magically went to 100. Why didn't they increase it before? Because they had no reason to do so (read: they had no real competitor offering more space).

      I haven't used my GMail account much, only because my Yahoo account is some 8 years old and is pretty well established. But GMail (whether I had a GMail account or not) caused Yahoo to give me more space, just to remain in competition (and, admittedly, that's one of the main reasons I still use my Yahoo account rather than switching to GMail; their marketing ploy worked on me).

      Google has set standards in search engine technology, (targetted) advertising methods, and (before even leaving Beta status) free email accounts... and in each of these areas, has caused other, more established companies to offer better service to remain in competition.

      A good thing, even if I don't use GMail itself...

    37. Re:*Sigh* by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, important emails bairly ever take up much space at all. They are usually text, sometimes pdf's, rarely pictures. Use outlook/mozilla/whatever for the few important emails, and gmail for everything else. (This of course assumes you have more than one account, and I for one never ever give out the important email account to anyone unless I KNOW they will be sending important emails).

      Currently I am down to 3 accounts that I read (though that contains many many email addresses). Soon it will be 2, one important and one gmail. Losing all my data on gmail will only be an issue if you think your joke/porn emails are important.

    38. Re:*Sigh* by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      I have had many friends who didn't really even want an invite to gmail, but once they got one anyway and tried it out, they suddenly stopped using anything else.

      Personally I think google used the 1gig as advertising, but its the actual way it works that will make it the number one service, at least for email. ;)

    39. Re:*Sigh* by @madeus · · Score: 2, Informative

      You would have to be a complete knob to keep anything important in a free webmail account.

      *raises eyebrow*

      1) Use GPG to encrypt your emails (using a web-to-imap/pop proxy from freshmeat.net, together with your email client of choice [mutt, pine, evolution, Mail.app etc]).

      2) Get said proxy together with fetchmail and/or quick 10 min $script_lang script to suck it down and just back it up locally every now and again.

    40. Re:*Sigh* by Moley · · Score: 1

      I've never actually been to one of these penis contests, but they sound weird!

    41. Re:*Sigh* by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 1

      Well, I certainly benefited. I've had a Yahoo! Mail account for as long as I can remember. And for a lot of that time, I was constantly hitting the limit cause of spam. Probably lost a few legitimate emails in the process. Now, where it would have hit the limit before, it now says 1% used :D.

      And, you know, there is a pretty strong lock-in effect. Switching my email to some other provider would be an effort of biblical proportions (well, relatively speaking - I'm super lazy), and even after notifying contacts, and switching out all the newsletter/blog/porn subscriptions, I'd still have to check it cause somebody will forget.

      In any case, only one person is going to get that terabyte, so I wouldn't consider that a market influence. But since those 10GB accounts are out there for free, and the MSN 2GB, I wouldn't be suprised if my gmail harddrive gets some extra space soon :D

    42. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh* I'm a pompous geek.
      *Sigh* I was an uncoordinated whiny boob and never learned how to compete. All competetors have small penises.
      *Sigh* Why can't everyone be as great as me? The world would be such as better place.

    43. Re:*Sigh* by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

      what the hell is a penis contest??

    44. Re:*Sigh* by mpcooke3 · · Score: 1

      You would have to be a complete knob to keep anything important in a free webmail account.

      Hmm, clearly someone needs to integrate RAID into a virtual web mail server that uses hotmail, gmail, yahoo etc, underneath. So when microsoft goes bust it can rebuild your missing emails onto gmail using the parity data stored at yahoo mail.

      Matt.

    45. Re:*Sigh* by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

      I think what is sad here is that companies are emphasizing on email account size, they're using that as a marketing tool to promote their service.

      While there is nothing wrong with promoting their big accounts, they definitely should emphasize on the quality services such as accessibility (for disabled people for instance), on different techniques for connecting to it. Allowing us to receive POP emails thru our online account.

      The only reason there is a contest on storage space nowadays is because its what people think is the most important.

      --
      If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    46. Re:*Sigh* by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Would you really make more use of 100 GB than 1 GB?

      Since they allow 500 meg attachments, yes, I would. I could back up my hard drives by sending myself emails, for instance.

    47. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's that research on the 50ft woman going?

    48. Re:*Sigh* by Pidder · · Score: 1

      My Yahoo account has 100 MB (yes it's a free account). It changed from 4 or 6 to 100 recently.

    49. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like my ex.

      Thanks! I'll be here all week.

    50. Re:*Sigh* by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      You would have to be a complete knob

      But this one goes to 11.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    51. Re:*Sigh* by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      No, you just have to be a normal (i.e., non-slashdot) user.

      If your mail is important and you only have one copy of it, stored on a webmail service which provides no guarrantees (and none of them do) - and you can't even be bothered to save out a copy to your hard drive for the stuff you really don't want to lose - then yes, you're a complete knob. If something goes wrong or the company folds, you have absolutely no reason to bitch if you lose everything in your account.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    52. Re:*Sigh* by Ragica · · Score: 1

      But who will use your service when they find out however that mine allows for an entire 1 mllion, 46 thousand, five hundred and seventy-six bytes?

    53. Re:*Sigh* by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Why are they idiots for offering us a more attractive product than the competition?

      You're right though -- it is just an advertising gimmick when it comes down to it. I mean, I've had a webmail account that I check about once a week, and I don't think it's ever gona above 10MB of storage at a time. I would think that's pretty typical webmail usage.

      Only a very small percentage of the user base will ever come close to reaching their max, whether it's 1GB, 2GB, 100GB, whatever. The companies have almost nothing to lose by promising the stars and the moon, since most of us don't have access to a spaceship that can take us there anyway.

    54. Re:*Sigh* by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      Use Raima - Redundant Array (of) Independent Mail Accounts. Forward the important stuff to 4 free 1 GB accounts. Just don't forget to send a checksum to the 5th account!

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    55. Re:*Sigh* by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      LOL! You clown, I almost spit my water all over the place!

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    56. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes the phrase "Sleepin' wit' da fishes" a little more cheerful, though.

  9. To win 1TB by erick99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are allowed 500MB attachments so I assume you could upload 200 or so of them sequentially until you have filled up 100GB and then you win the 1TB mailbox. And then.... Profit?

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:To win 1TB by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes but how many services allow you to *send* 500MB attachments (excluding running your own mailserver). Then again you need to upload *100GB* which would still take alot of time none-the-less. Either way 100GB/1TB at that point everything is just gravy.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:To win 1TB by Student_Tech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Send the email to your self, click on the "keep copy in sent folder" (Or whatever). So for every message you get 1 GB down (of course I haven't read the terms and conditions for the contest, but it seems like a posible solution, either that or get 2 addresses and send back and forth).

    3. Re:To win 1TB by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      First you'd have to get that 1GB in that acct in the first place. Even with a high end DSL/Cable connection you're looking at a long upload time.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:To win 1TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this contest basically comes down to who can upload the fastest. Fun...

    5. Re:To win 1TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes but how many services allow you to *send* 500MB attachments (excluding running your own mailserver)."

      Not many.

      500MB attachments... do they have to be real attachments?

      "cat /dev/urandom > file" (waits till file is 500MB) "mail -s "Fill 'er up!" my@addr file"

      If you can find a way to send the same message multiple times while only transmitting it once (CC to yourself, maybe?) you'd have it in no time.

    6. Re:To win 1TB by cornjones · · Score: 1

      at this point, it would be alot faster to get a pair of accounts and mail a smaller (100mb) file back and forth to yourself w/ as many ccs as they let you do. attach each old message to the newest and you start doubling. you could fill it pretty quickly that way. I would assume this is done already. i could see somebody doing this in under an hour.

    7. Re:To win 1TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's kind of irrelevant since nobody has their email servers configured to RECEIVE 500MB attachments.

    8. Re:To win 1TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And right now I am at school where I can maintain about 800KB/sec from a few machines I have access to.... (So, lemme see 500MB in under 11 minutes...)

    9. Re:To win 1TB by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Yes but how many services allow you to *send* 500MB attachments (excluding running your own mailserver).
      Given the people you're talking to, I'd say "excluding running your own mailserver" is kind of a big "if". :-)

      Besides, Net::SMTP.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    10. Re:To win 1TB by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

      Damn... just upload one message and then forward it to yourself 200 times... then you don't have to upload more information.

      kiwi

    11. Re:To win 1TB by numbski · · Score: 1

      I've already gotten one of these accounts, and i was so badly hoping that there was some sort of interface....procmail, shell (now THERE'S some wishful thinking)....anything that I could script so that i could e-mail myself binary files, and then set it up so that if someone e-mails me with the message in a certain format, it would automatically turn around and forward out a specific message.

      Binaries on demand. Heh. >:)

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    12. Re:To win 1TB by tepples · · Score: 1

      Given the people you're talking to, I'd say "excluding running your own mailserver" is kind of a big "if"

      "The people you're talking to" are people who bitch about ISPs that block outgoing TCP ports 25 and 587 for "virus control purposes" and don't unblock them for people who can prove they've taken antivirus measures for "revenue control purposes".

    13. Re:To win 1TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, this one? Read the article, dipshit.

    14. Re:To win 1TB by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Its very easy really. You send the 500MB attachment from the same account. Haven't you ever sent email from an account to itself as a reminder to do something? I do it all the time at work, so that when I check my email at home it pops up.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  10. 3 Steps.... by Scrab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1)Get account

    2)Post email address to Slashdot, asking for any and all to send you random stuff

    3)Profit?

    Or should there be a ????? in there?

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
    1. Re:3 Steps.... by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      2)Post email address to Slashdot, asking for any and all to send you random stuff
      ...
      Or should there be a ????? in there?

      I'm so terribly afraid that if all of Slashdot sent random stuff it would more likely be a !!!!! in there...

      -- Pete.

  11. Slashdot Network - p2p by microsopht · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Imagine All the slashdot guys sharing all their interesting stuff!This email account could very well serve that purpose -- Probably a new kind of file sharing system for the nerds of slashdot.

    But yes,the password needs to be unchangeable...

    1. Re:Slashdot Network - p2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine All the slashdot guys sharing all their interesting stuff!This email account could very well serve that purpose

      Yeah but what would the rest of the 100 gigs be used for?

  12. back in the bubble again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is this, 1999 again? where is my $100k/yr entry level job???

    1. Re:back in the bubble again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ALERT: American is attempting to locate his (outsourced) job. Call Bangalore for further instructisegfault
  13. Good to know by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    I've only had my gmail account since July, but as of today I've hit the 10% mark, and I don't even send that much email - 99% of it is slashdot, livejournal or other bulliten board reply notifications - maybe 10 a day, and the occasional 2MB digicam pic from the long distance girlfriend.

    Hopefully if my usage trend continues, there should be 100 GB accounts for everyone before my account completely fills up in 5 years here.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her tits aren't that great. Do you really need a 2MB image of them?

    2. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      maybe 10 a day, and the occasional 2MB digicam pic from the long distance girlfriend.

      Please post username and password for verification purposes.

    3. Re:Good to know by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      pic

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Good to know by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      she's not too good at reducing the images form 4megpix. down to 1megpix, and gmail doesn't choke on big attachments, so why bother?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you didn't bother to rebut the comment about her tits.

    6. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She 'aint bad, but couldn't you have found something with a bit more to offer in the tit department? Fuck, her frame looks like my computer chassis.

  14. Bikers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this cheap bikers shot at californians? I rarely see bikers around here, even at the hippie grocery stores they all drive SUV's and are talking on their cell phones.

    1. Re:Bikers? by corian · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's this cheap bikers shot at californians? I rarely see bikers around here, even at the hippie grocery stores they all drive SUV's and are talking on their cell phones.

      You didn't read the article.

      "Hellacious Riders' primary business is an online motorcycle magazine which publishes articles about motorcycles, lists classifieds, and provides access to a topic-specific search engine. In order to attract interest, the company launched a 3-Gigabyte free email service a little over a month ago and since then has signed up more than 36 million users, according to Jim Weiss, President of the iTrade Group which publishes Hellacious Riders."

    2. Re:Bikers? by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      iTrade? I think Apple is going to introduce iSue soon.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
  15. Big whoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 GB email? That's so April 1st, 2004. How about coming up with a new gimmick? NOBODY is gonna need 100 GB for email!!

  16. Shall we do it? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Quick, someone post their hriders email address. We'll do our part.

    I'll sign up for one when I get home if no one posts a reply.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Shall we do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm longhairbam@gmail.com.

      Enjoy.

  17. Rediculous by FiberOpPraise · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay, 1GB was fine, a reasonable limit that was more of a marketing ploy than a palpable number for the average user. Soon, 2GB and 5GB email accounts were offered in response to Gmails initial 1GB. This was really pushing the limit of being reasonable. 100GB totally crosses the line. When the advertised size of email accounts becomes larger than most people's hard drives, there is a problem. This is getting absurd. Please stop.

    1. Re:Rediculous by hfis · · Score: 2
      I agree completely. I, as a consumer, am SICK and TIRED of benefiting from corporate competition. Why can't they all just knock us back to 5mb?

      Those were the days...

    2. Re:Rediculous by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      This is getting absurd. Please stop.

      NO! I wanna win that 1Tb account!!!!

    3. Re:Rediculous by losinggeneration · · Score: 2, Funny

      When the advertised size of email accounts becomes larger than most people's hard drives
      Yeah man, I'm tired of them rubbing it in my face that I'm still running a 512 megabyte hard drive.

    4. Re:Rediculous by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Unlike Gmail, this one appears to have pop3 access. That should make something like GmailFS easier to implement...

    5. Re:Rediculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is ridiculous, root word "ridicule".

    6. Re:Rediculous by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      It's a little bit ahead of its time, but not that much. It's already quite reasonable to send decent quality photos through email. With 1000 of these photos you've already filled up 1 gig. Now take it a step further, and what about sending full videos via email? Sure, it's rare now, but given 500 meg attachment limits and 100 gig email accounts, I'm sure it'll be commonplace in the future. On my 128K DSL connection I can send a 100 meg video in under 2 hours. That's reasonable enough that I'd do it if I had the tools. Hopefully this email site has a "resume upload" feature.

  18. How can we use 100 GBytes? Obvious answer. by reporter · · Score: 1, Insightful
    How can we use 100 gigabytes of e-mail storage?

    Obvious is the answer: storing pornographic pictures (as e-mail attachments) of luscious lesbian women commiting erotic sex acts.

    Storage requirements for pornography are (1) lot of space and (2) optional reliability. If the e-mail server failed and all the pictures were lost, there would be no problem. We'd just spent another 48 hours searching for them on the web.

    Storage requirements for personal files or work files demand reliability. An e-mail server that offers free e-mail accounts is not likely to backup its data. "free" does carry a price.

  19. Ugh-Fragile-this ego side down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You'd see so much T&A that sex would be just... boring...."

    Well I guess we know were your moniker came from.

  20. By the Way... .Mac upping storage too. by cmacb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Apple is FINALLY uping their .Mac e-mail space to 250M. I doubt that will get another $99 out of me but I think its interesting that in spite of the hype (reported here a day or so ago) about Hotmail finally rolling out their new storage, a later story (not reported here to my knowledge) has it that they (MS) are running into problems and putting many of the upgrades (mine for example) off indefinitely.

    As I predicted when G-mail first came out the MS infrastructure is going to collapse under the weight of trying to keep up. Maybe they just need to BUY another company who can do this, as well as a lot more RAID storage. HP and Intel will be happy.

    1. Re:By the Way... .Mac upping storage too. by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Think Soviet union.

      The final 'software' arms race has begun.

      MS v. World.

      Lock and Load.

      Duh-duh-DUH!

      haha. funny stuff.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  21. 100GB? by slimak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't this starting to get out of hand? Seriously, who actually needs 100 GB or even 1 GB for email? Unless you send lots of pictures/movies/audio/.../ and use your email as a repository (probably not a great idea) anything over a few hundred meg seems overkill (my ~/.Mail is It would be interesting to see what the average GMAIL account size is. More interesting would be whether any of these companies would rethink these large, free email accounts of average users kept them 95% full. Seems that having 95 GB devoted (not just available) to each and every user would be difficult.

    1. Re:100GB? by lessthanjakejohn · · Score: 1

      Um...

      Gmail is not even a year old. The point is that you can store a lot of mail and never have to delete. At this stage most users boxes are probaly at 5-15% if they use them regulary. I use mine every once in a while and I am at 6%

  22. Re: by Fluid-X · · Score: 5, Funny

    With 100 Gb, they can hardcode the "You are using 0% of your mailbox" message.

  23. HORRIBLE Website by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the people too lazy to read the article, the link is here.. But the site's design is just the most horrible thing I've ever seen, and the email capacity seems to be only 10GB.

    I would still love to see these idiots slashdotted. Go get em boys.

    1. Re:HORRIBLE Website by abergou · · Score: 1

      While it is true that the free account has a capacity of 10Gb the pay one actually does have a 100Gb capacity as noted on their page: List Any Motorcycle, Part or Collectible for only $5.00 Your Ad Includes 25 color pictures & runs until it sells! Free Membership with 100 GB Email Acct. Yes I aggree that the site does have a rather awful design.

    2. Re:HORRIBLE Website by cmacb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This looks a lot to me like one of those thrown together PHP/MySQL web sites (that I'm sorry to say I've been responsible for at one time or another). It's also quite slow. If they can't handle a Slashdotting I wonder if they can handle all multi-meg photo messages that some people will be tempted to throw at it. Whether it's 1G, 10G, or 1T, it doesn't do anyone any good if the server is too slow to handle the traffic.

    3. Re:HORRIBLE Website by alchemistkevin · · Score: 1

      only 10GB???

    4. Re:HORRIBLE Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the site's design is just the most horrible thing I've ever seen, and the email capacity seems to be only 10GB.

      I can't hate a site like that; it's so tacky it's cute. I mean, that jeep thing floating around is pretty funny, you have to admit.

      Does the scrolling text actually work under Windows, or at least IE? It's totally fucked on Mozilla/Linux. I can't believe they'd put it out knowing it looked like that.

    5. Re:HORRIBLE Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the site's design is just the most horrible thing I've ever seen

      It's hellacious.

    6. Re:HORRIBLE Website by SteelFist · · Score: 1

      Can I cry now?

  24. Too Easy by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is too easy to win, assuming you have broadband.

    Step 1: Rip all three Star Wars and the extended editions of The Lord of the Rings Movies (yeah yeah, the third isn't out yet) to your HD.

    Step 2: Mail copies to 25 of your friends with GMail accounts as attachments.

    Step 3: Have your friends change each of the file names and mail them back.

    Bingo! Instant excession of 100 GB.

    Alternately, you could just post your e-mail address here and say something like "You wussy, panty-wasted Linux hackers couldn't spam-bomb my account even if you wanted to! Your hacking skills are pathetic and lame! Besides, everyone knows that REAL MEN use Windows!"

    I figured that's good for getting mailed 500 full distros within an hour. That should do the trick. ;-)

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Too Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahahhahahahhahahhahahaaa......

      Slashdot posters...

      25 friends !!!

      bwahahahahhaa...... /wipes eyes

      ahhh....I needed that :)

      Next thing they'll be talking about having girlfriends or something !

    2. Re:Too Easy by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Why not just upload Star Wars ep 1 and 2 in uncompressed AVI? Get 1TB of storage and a world record of 100GB of junk mail in the same day.

    3. Re:Too Easy by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

      You wussy, panty-wasted Linux hackers couldn't spam-bomb my account even if you wanted to! Your hacking skills are pathetic and lame! Besides, everyone knows that REAL MEN use Windows!

      whats wrong, you guys can't handle the truth?

      --
      Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Too Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured that's good for getting mailed 500 full distros within an hour. That should do the trick. ;-)


      I think you hit a good note - an Open Source ISO repository. Invite people to fill it up, and then make a front-end that'll scrape the webmail interface to allow people to download their favorite ISOs. You get all the credit, the mail service gets all the bandwidth.

      Yankel
  25. Unlimited! by z3021017 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think we'll see the first unlimited e-mail accounts being offered very soon...

    100GB is basically 'unlimited' to the average email user anyway. Now I'm just waiting for the next company to offer true unlimited servce.

    --
    Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
    1. Re:Unlimited! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now I'm just waiting for the next company to offer true unlimited servce

      Uhh... You've come to the right place
      Of course, OSDN isn't giving them away, but they are also giving add-free access for $14/year.


      --
      Free gmail invites

    2. Re:Unlimited! by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      "Unlimited", just like cable connections.
      (Unlimited, unless we think you're using too much. No published number, but just what we think on that particular day, depending on who you talk to)

    3. Re:Unlimited! by Megaslow · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course, OSDN isn't giving them away, but they are also giving add-free access for $14/year.

      Slashmail has nothing to do with Slashdot or OSTG.

    4. Re:Unlimited! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      sigh.
      That should be "ad-free" as in "free of advertising" not "add-free" as in "free of arithmetic"

    5. Re:Unlimited! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      Wow, ya learn something every day.
      Thanks for pointing that out.

    6. Re:Unlimited! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your question. As your Internet Service Provider,
      we are pleased to assist in your exploration of the computing world's
      fastest growing realm.

      As you have no doubt observed, the explosion of the Web has made
      your existing command line account rather limited. To better serve
      your expanding needs, we are pleased to offer the following tiered
      service packages:

      Baseline Account
      This is our most basic account. You get a shell prompt. On-line
      help is disabled. Transfer protocol is 'cat'.
      $5.00/month

      Extra(tm) Account
      All Baseline features, plus:
      o On-line help
      o On-line manual pages (first 20 accesses free)
      o XModem (checksum)
      $7.50/month

      Super(tm) Account
      All Extra(tm) features, plus:
      o Unlimited manual page reference
      o Lower case support
      o 8-bit connection
      o XModem (CRC)
      $10.00/month + $1.00/hour

      SuperExtra(tm) Account
      All Super(tm) features, plus:
      o Command line editing (backspace, ^X)
      o 24-hour access privileges
      o XModem (1K blocks), YModem
      o Free outbound mail
      $12.00/month + $1.25/hour

      Master(tm) Account
      All SuperExtra(tm) features, plus:
      o Free inbound mail
      o Newsgroup access
      o ZModem
      $15.00/month + $1.65/hour

      MasterExtra(tm) Account
      All Master(tm) features, plus:
      o Configurable newline termination
      o Apple Newton(tm) support
      o Personal netnews killfiles enabled
      o 9600 bps access privileges
      o Kermit
      $20.00/month + $2.10/hour

      MasterSuper(tm) Account
      All MasterExtra(tm) features, plus:
      o Account password protection
      o Shift-lock support
      o Access to code development tools (vi, emacs, EDLIN,
      etc.)
      o UUCP
      $22.00/month + $2.50/hour + $0.01/Kbyte

      MasterSuperExtra(tm) Account
      All MasterSuper(tm) features, plus:
      o Access to additional code development tools (cc, as,
      etc.)
      o 80 column support
      o 512K storage
      o Tint control
      o Gopher
      $25.00/month + $2.75/hour + $0.05/Kbyte

      Executive(tm) Account
      All MasterSuperExtra(tm) features, plus:
      o Access to compiled output (a.out)
      o 2048K disk storage (additional to 512K on tape)
      o 600 DPI
      o SLIP/PPP
      $50.00/month + $4.99/hour + $0.198/Kbyte

      We are also pleased to announce our first account specially
      tailored for businesses:

      Entrepreneur(tm) Account
      o Your choice of shell (csh, tcsh, ksh, bash, etc.)
      o SLIP, PPP (yielding direct FTP and HTTP connections)
      o 14400 bps, 28800 bps, ISDN, or leased line connections available
      o 20M storage on RAID array with mirrored backup (additional
      storage for extra charge)
      o Full suite of development tools (yacc, lex, sed, awk, perl,
      etc.)
      o DNS registration (become your own domain on the net!)
      o Complete PGP tool set
      o CNID reverse-lookup phone database
      o USGS maps collated and annotated by zip code and demographics
      (in Postscript and DVI)
      o Access to all our members' registration data (excepting those
      who explicitly requested at least three times to be excluded)
      o Public relations tools (SpamTool, with NoCem evasion heuristics)
      o Libel/slander control facilities (canceltool)
      o Intelligent mail filter suites
      o 24-hour phone support

      $300.00/month!
      (Must be registered as a commercial business within your state to
      qualify)

      We think you'll agree these new options offer unparallelled
      flexibility, and that no one else offers a better deal for direct
      Internet access. We're pleased you've chosen us, and hope will
      continue to stay with us. See you on the Net!

      (Ripped from: http://www.cs.indiana.edu/l/www/ftp/

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Unlimited! by r0tt13 · · Score: 1

      I already have unlimited...
      --snip from /etc/aliases---
      user1: /dev/null
      user2: /dev/null
      user3: /dev/null
      --end snip--

      Works great. :P

  26. This is really cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already abused gmail as a bootlegged music storage area using labels to organize things.

    Since this lets you have 500 meg attachments, now I could share porn movies.

  27. Next poll topic! by klep · · Score: 1

    100 GB is not that much. So that spawns this next poll topic/question:

    What is the total HD size you have under your control?

    I'm sure it's > 100GB

    1. Re:Next poll topic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polling the slashdot community about the size of their harddrives and using information as a basis for the size of the average user's harddrive is total nonsense. That is like polling the slashdot community about users' average penis size and comparing that with ... you get the idea.

    2. Re:Next poll topic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Laptop has 60GB, of which I have roughly 25GB free. *Shrug* It suffices just fine for me.

    3. Re:Next poll topic! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I have two 80GB hard drives and a 40GB nearing "full" status. I have two other 40GB drives for offline backup of "important" materials.

      I also have every E-mail and Fidonet message to or from myself since 1989 ;-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Next poll topic! by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Hm, 20GB in server (was 4GB, but when the HD died, I found out it is ~impossible to find 20GB HDs anymore), 30GB in desktop and 10GB in laptop.

      For those that cannot add, that's 60GB. Shared between three computers. Having laptop dual-boot and desktop quad-boot OSs cuts down on space a bit too.

      Of course, if you want to just give me a 40GB hard-drive to bring me up to the status quo I won't complain ;)

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    5. Re:Next poll topic! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      was 4GB, but when the HD died, I found out it is ~impossible to find 20GB HDs anymore

      Yes, exactly! Last time I needed a new harddisk (that was, uhm, two years ago), 20Gigs was already a dying breed. Actually, I wanted smaller for my server, but alas, nothing smaller than 20Gig was there. So, I had to settle for that. Which is annoying because my old server won't boot from 20Gig drives, so it has a 1.5Gig drive just for bootstrap purposes too. Stupid, but that's the way it is.

      What are the smallest sizes these days? 60Gig? Or already 80Gig? I haven't bene paying attention lately.

      Funny that nucleardog.com website ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Next poll topic! by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      "What are the smallest sizes these days? 60Gig? Or already 80Gig? I haven't bene paying attention lately."

      I found only one store carrying 40GB HDs, the rest only went as small as 80GB.

      (BTW, that was supposed to be <20GB) I ended up getting a used 20GB from a guy I know.

      "Funny that nucleardog.com website ;-)"

      I know, eh? I usually don't have much up there. I generally spend more time working on hostee's sites (mostly friends) instead of my own. I generally have a pretty hard time writing anything at all of any length (even this comment, I've likely rewritten each part 3 or 4 times to try and get it as close as possibly to what I mean), as generally the chaos inside my head does not translate well to paper, so I never have any original content.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  28. URL by fatovich · · Score: 1

    http://hriders.com/

    For those who don't RTFA

  29. What they didn't tell you is... by kylemonger · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... their mail server is behind a 2400 baud modem.

    1. Re:What they didn't tell you is... by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 0

      Bwa. That's if you get in first. Otherwise you gotta wait in the queue. Cause it's one at a time.

      --
      Sig
  30. After slashdot effect how many users? by microsopht · · Score: 1
    Up to today, Weiss has signed up 52 million users in countries - a number which he wants to grow significantly to be recognized as record:
    Now after the slashdot effect,how many million users will be added?

    Hurry! Sign up before the site gets slashdotted. {i have already got myself 10 GB space!!}

    1. Re:After slashdot effect how many users? by gneer · · Score: 1

      not too many since the server can't handle that many requests...

  31. Spam Harvesting by yintercept · · Score: 1

    I have a few mailto links posted around and about to give the email address crawlers fodder. Getting the terabytes of spam is not difficult...the problem is that there is zero value to the actual fruit of the spam harvest.

    1. Re:Spam Harvesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Getting the terabytes of spam is not difficult ..."

      Maybe; but getting them to one email ID is ...

    2. Re:Spam Harvesting by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not so. Feed this spam harvest into the bayes classifier for SpamAssassin or another filter system and train it to recognise that as all spam. This will seriously increase the quality of it's spam checking in future. I fed about 12,000 into mine, the result of about five months worth of harvesting.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    3. Re:Spam Harvesting by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is, one persons spam is another persons ham.

      "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"

      It all depends on perspective.

      Of course, there are common things that neither party wants, but giving a one size fits all filter for all but the most obvious will cause false positives.

      Don't you think the big mail companies would have sorted it out by now if they could? They have the largest harvest of spam around.

      [I was going to stop here, below are just random ramblings]

      Having said all that, I believe every person should be allocated a bloom filter with their mail classification preferences. This filter is used against the results of all the identification rules.

      All the mail companies should accept this token and display mail which passes. Currently, I have 4 mail providers who deal with spam differently, I would like to setup one set of rules.
      The good thing about using a bloom is that preferences can be merged increasing the effectiveness, for instance, a virus filter, a fakes filter, a childsafe filter, or an office filter, developers filter etc.

      Of course, this way, we don't change the front end mailing system itself, and people who don't use this token are free to handle the mail however they like.

      I'll stop wafflin now.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Spam Harvesting by MagicM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, there are common things that neither party wants

      Spam isn't about what someone wants or doesn't want. It's about what's unsolicited. Yeah some people like looking at the pictures in their porn spam, but that doesn't make it any less spam.

    5. Re:Spam Harvesting by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      For a while, the mails I get as part of slashdot (the ones to inform me of comment moderation etc) were filtered out as spam.

      They are bulk driven mails that passed a criteria, and somebody with my old provider mustv clicked "Report as spam", or the filter was screwed.

      I wanted these mails, but someone else might not, how should a spam filter decide who is right?

      I do realise here on slash that its a preference to send or not, but I can quite feasibly see somebody getting irate and just saying "damn you all, stop sending me this crap" and clicking the SPAM button.

      Should I be blocked from getting these mails because YOU said you think its spam?

      As I said in my original posting, there will always be obvious junk that neither of us wants, but there is a VERY large proportion of grey area mails that depend upon a users' own preferences.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Spam Harvesting by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      I fed about 12,000 into mine, the result of about five months worth of harvesting.

      Lucky. I get that much spam every 9 or 10 days. I tried using Thunderbird's spam management, but it was so slow due to the sheer volume that I had to turn it off.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    7. Re:Spam Harvesting by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 1

      You know, you're going to hate me, but I haven't gotten a single piece of spam yet on my gmail account, and usually only about 2-5 per day on my yahoo account. Stringing together a lot of German words into a single, sixteen character jumble, and using that as your account name (GMail, that is) seems to do the trick.

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
  32. Spam will fill mailbox quickly by javacowboy · · Score: 1

    I could easily fill up a 100 GB account. All I need to do is try to get as much spam to my account as possible, putting that email address on as many sites as I can think of.

    Granted, this is assuming the mail account doesn't have any sophisticated spam filtering.

    I could also just zip up half the files in my harddrive, and keep forwarding the message to myself over and over again.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:Spam will fill mailbox quickly by kgbspy · · Score: 1

      Do you only have a 1gb hard drive? Or did you just not RTFA...?

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
  33. I can win... by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Funny
    They even extended a challenge to get the first user to completely fill up the account

    Piece of cake...is there a way to auto-forward my hotmail account? Should take about a week...

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  34. A real use for this stuff by Deep+Fried+Geekboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dunno about anyone else but I USE this stuff. I gave all my gmail invites to myself so I now have many Gmail accounts, which are all used for the same thing ... offsite backup.

    The 100 G account would be great for backing up digital images, something that is extremely hard to do otherwise (bit rot on CDs, DVDs and even naked hard drives, which is what I use now). Yeah, I take a lot of pictures.

    I just got notified that because I purchased extra .mac storage, mine has been upped to 1.2 Gb. Hooray!

    You cannot have too many backup strategies. I use .mac for all keychains (containing serial numbers, passwords and private banking details), plus current 'work' folder... then I have a Retrospect backup to a remote FTP server for my boot drive, plus a nightly mirror onto a second hard drive. You CANNOT have too much of this stuff.

    The day I walked into my office and my HD was dead, I saved the entire accumulated cost of all this by being able to boot up from the second drive within seconds and carry on working.

    --

    I'm not wrong. You haven't thought about it hard enough.

    1. Re:A real use for this stuff by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      Your sig is offering gmail to strangers.
      Your backup strategy involves using your gmail storage.
      Makes me wonder, do you realize that your gmail account gets nuked if someone invited by you starts sending spam? I'm not sure how far up the tree the nuking goes, but if you invite a spammer, you both get the axe.
      Just sayin....

    2. Re:A real use for this stuff by Deep+Fried+Geekboy · · Score: 1

      Hm ... good point. In fact I've only given away one gmail account to a stranger and I checked them out first as far as I could.

      I don't use the gmail account for any critical backup... in fact my whole strategy is that there should be no such thing as a critical backup... but it is a VERY convenient tool. For example, an account that you forward all 'your password is' emails to.

      --

      I'm not wrong. You haven't thought about it hard enough.

    3. Re:A real use for this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when gmail reaches a point where lots of users start abusing gmail like this and they just start deleting these accounts? There go your backups.

      I find it highly unlikely that google employees don't have something where they can get a listing of email accounts by capacity and then go in to search through your invites and start looking at your mailbox and all your invitee's mailboxes and start deleting shit.

    4. Re:A real use for this stuff by Deep+Fried+Geekboy · · Score: 1

      Like I say, no individual backup is critical, so I could care less. My strategy is basically that I can lose ALL of my backups except one and still be okay.

      If I lose them all then probably the world has ended.

      However I seriously doubt that Google bothers to check accounts in the way you describe. The cost of having an employee do this would far outweigh the savings, not to mention the PR disaster that would follow.

      --

      I'm not wrong. You haven't thought about it hard enough.

    5. Re:A real use for this stuff by Daagar · · Score: 1

      Having multiple accounts is against the terms of service, is it not?

  35. Size Doesn't Matter by astrosmash · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bah, humbug!

    Give me 100Mb of storage and an interface that is half as intuitive as GMail's is and I'll really be impressed.

    --
    ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    1. Re:Size Doesn't Matter by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I noticed that sites that have more whitespace I consider more "userfriendly".

    2. Re:Size Doesn't Matter by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      How about something twice as good? 100MB of storage and an interface that is ALL as intuitive as Gmail!

      http://gmail.google.com/

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    3. Re:Size Doesn't Matter by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, what? You want less space an a harder interface? Intuitive would mean that the functionality is relatively understandable and easy to use because the layout makes sense and is easily deductible. Why would you want something half as intuitive? Wouldn't that be the same as twice as hard?

    4. Re:Size Doesn't Matter by astrosmash · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about all of the these webmail sites that are trying to compete with Gmail by offering 1GB+ of space.

      They don't understand what it is about Gmail that makes it so good.

      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    5. Re:Size Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its lack of virus scanning, zip file attachment support, html editing, or POP3 or IMAP access?

    6. Re:Size Doesn't Matter by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      Was to answer exactly that. 100 Gb of email and an interface that don't enables you to really USE that amount of email and in practice it could perfectly be gmail for the last gb and the rest in /dev/null.

      Of course, 1Gb looks like a big size until you think is for all your life, and if you follow they advice of archive everything then it not look so big.

      But size is just a part of the equation. That is usable, fast, takes in account spam/virus/etc, and in fact enables you to manage that amount of mail are equally big factors there. Is like the difference between getting a handful of sand ("normal" traditional webmails), a bag full of sand (the bag enables you to work/move it) and someone giving you the sahara desert and you have only your hands to move it... ok, is a lot of sand, but you still getting only a handful in practice.

  36. What irresponsible attitude... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 0
    to make it a contest to fill up this space. Just think about the huge bandwidth wasted by all these customers trying to win 1TB to fill up with garbage, junk and spam mail.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
    1. Re:What irresponsible attitude... by gneer · · Score: 1

      True. And then: all the people who didn't get the 1 TB account. It's probably not a fun to delete thousands of mails by hand, fifty per page...

  37. 36 million subscribers * 100Gb = ???? by seanvaandering · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In order to attract interest, the company launched a 3-Gigabyte free email service a little over a month ago and since then has signed up more than 36 million users...

    Another alternative is, of course, to post it on Slashdot. But the question that lingers, is how in the hell did a little unknown magazine end up signing up 36 million people?

    Now I'm not a biker myself, but you'd think with that many e-mail addresses from this company I'd of seen it once or twice working in tech support...

    1. Re:36 million subscribers * 100Gb = ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase you're looking for is "I'd have seen it".

    2. Re:36 million subscribers * 100Gb = ???? by revery · · Score: 1

      Another alternative is, of course, to post it on Slashdot. But the question that lingers, is how in the hell did a little unknown magazine end up signing up 36 million people?

      There is a more likely scenario: there is only one customer but he signed himself up 36 million times.

      Welcome back biker04564346, you are using 0% of 3,600,000,000 GB

      (yeah, yeah, I know each account would only see 1/36,000,000th of the space, but I was going for funny)

    3. Re:36 million subscribers * 100Gb = ???? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Another alternative is, of course, to post it on Slashdot. But the question that lingers, is how in the hell did a little unknown magazine end up signing up 36 million people?

      Well, it's easy. It just takes a little higher-level math. Let's say that your average free Hotmail account (until very recently) topped out at 2 MB. So each of these 100 GB accounts is actually like 50000 Hotmail accounts. 36 million 'people', then, actually represents only 720 unique people.

      See? And I know this is a legitimate mathematical technique, because the RIAA uses it.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  38. Why Longhorn of Course! by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Oh too easy! Just have someone email him the Longhorn ISOs. That should fill up 100GB real quick, and nobody has to get nekkid!

    1. Re:Why Longhorn of Course! by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      The final Longhorn ISOs will of course weigh in over a terabyte, requiring the Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Certified(R) huge holographic disc thingy that's been mentioned on Slashdot a few times.

      Of course if this does happen, that 1 TB requirement will stop most casual piraters...

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    2. Re:Why Longhorn of Course! by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 0

      Well, you know at the current rate, according to Moores Law and the rate of static linear regression of three dimesional power functions with the F-values aproaching zero at the rate of an inverse function to the -3.2, that the Holographic CD will just contain the installshield (you will have to download the rest, and only once). It will also take t, the limit of (x^2-1)/(x^5), as x approaches 0, seconds to get to 100% complete. But it will usually hang at 99% anyway, so you won't notice, even if it did finish.

      --
      Sig
    3. Re:Why Longhorn of Course! by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      By the time Longhorn comes out, a terrabyte will be nothing. We'll have 100 terrabyte removable optical media, and Verizon DSL will be offering 1.5 meg down / 256k up for $69.95/month!

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  39. site... by kagelump · · Score: 1

    http://www.hriders.com/ the sidebar says that its a "JOIN NOW!! (free 10GB email account)" btw when you click it, they say its $5 for motorcycle advertisement (or something like that) and a 100 gb email account... I'm still not sure how a motorcycle site and a giant email service relate to each other...

  40. Backups! by CSIP · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good place to store backups.

    All you'd need is a script to create & email entire backups to an address there.

    --
    "Nyquil - The stuffy, sneezy, why-the-hell-is-the-room-spinning medicine."
  41. wow by Abit667 · · Score: 0

    Even though 99.9% of the people will never come close to 100 gig thats going to be pretty cool if a bunch of people do. Even today 100gig is pretty large, even for the current hds out. If you manage to fill that 100 gig up with stuff that cant be compressed it must be pretty cool to know that you're using a good amount of some hd somewhere.

  42. What's the maximum attachment size? by TheWingThing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I need attachment size ~700MB for my, umm, "files" :D Then I can access my "files" from anywhere :D

  43. Easy to fill by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    They even extended a challenge to get the first user to completely fill up the account, the winner getting a 1 terabyte account

    What if I upload a 200 MB file and send to myself in email and then forward it over and over to myself until 100 GB is full. Shouldnt take more than an afternoon's work??

    1. Re:Easy to fill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS: With my university connection it would only take about 4-5 days to upload 100gb of data ;)

      That's assuming they don't come and kick down my door then rip the ethernet out of the wall before it finishes...

  44. Easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just subscribe to every pron site, bingo you got mail.

  45. Ahh by pHatidic · · Score: 1

    How to win contest:

    One post on usenet with your email address complaining about your small penis size. Then just sit back and wait.

  46. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point of pretending these services are for webmail? It seems to be nothing more than a web storage service with e-mail capability.

  47. 10 GB is free, 100 GB comes with $5 membership by $exyNerdie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    From http://www.Hriders.com:

    JOIN NOW!!
    free 10GB email account)

    List Any Motorcycle, Part or Collectible for only $5.00 Your Ad Includes 25 color pictures & runs until it sells! Free Membership with 100 GB Email Acct.



  48. Already unlimited by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    suso.org has already been doing this for 7 years for over 80 local customers. I basically don't have quota support in the kernel. So its not just for email. My philosophy is that if you don't give people a limit, they won't try to reach it. And guess what? It works. People don't abuse the service. They use it normally. A couple of users are exceptions and have over 1GB worth of email that has amassed over the past several years.

    I'm getting ready to install a server with 200GB of home space, so thus its like I offer 200GB email accounts. Whenever I get close to running out of space, I upgrade.

    1. Re:Already unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think it's smarter to have quotas, if only to ensure that a misbehaving script or whatever doesn't fill the entire drive and affect everyone.

      On my system, I have reasonable (slightly modest) quotas set and tell my users that if they have a reason for wanting more space, I'll give it to them. A couple users did, and so their quotas were increased. Another user was happy once I showed him the difference between just deleting a message in his mail client and actually expunging it. The others haven't complained.

  49. 100gb mail? just give me the stinkin drive! by tonyz2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where are they getting all this cheap storage? Instead of giving me a 100GB mailbox (with annoying blinking GIF ads), how about they just send me a 100GB hard drive (and a bunch of regular snail-mail junkmail that i can just throw away)?

    Yes, chide me, fellow slashdotters.. for I did not know that they are relying on sparse mailboxes.

    This company would terminate the service (or file for Chapter 11) long before the millionth user took their first gig.

    --
    click here to incinerate homeless people
  50. Gmail! by schnits0r · · Score: 1

    Yea well I have 1000 MB account with Gmail....erm..wait....~thinks~ ~re-calculates the difference~ Oh...sorry, carry on.

  51. hmmmm.... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    They even extended a challenge to get the first user to completely fill up the account, the winner getting a 1 terabyte account

    spam spam spam spam, spam spam spam spam, SPAM, wonderful spam.... Who'd have ever thought spam would get you a head in life?

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  52. 1 TB free service by microsopht · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When 10 GB email account is considered unfillable, so much that the owner is willing to give 1 server of 1 TB for the winner, the even better idea - to that owner and my fellow slashdotters ( if u wanna st art up a email service BTW },
    would be to offer 1 TB space for all- that would really be unprecedented and gain the maximum publicity and no one in this world would probably use more than a few GB - and the owner wouldnt have to worry about providing 1 Tb since as and when a user signs up , 1 Tb space doesnt need to be allocated and can be scaled up as and when required.

    1. Re:1 TB free service by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      I think the sentence you just wrote would have trouble fitting into 100GB.

  53. i don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't think this is a good scheme for stealing music, it's too easy to track it down who owns the server that's hosting all the warez and they'd probably tell real quick who's connecting to it, it's still best to just stick to 0-day ftpz

    1. Re:i don't think so by microsopht · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry lamer here.what is zero day ftp

    2. Re:i don't think so by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Not 100% sure, but I believe it's an open (world read\write) FTP server that hasn't been used yet.

      Kind of like a 0-day exploit, can be quite valuable if you're in the trade.

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  54. The sie must be a joke. by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't trust these guys to be around in six months. The site looks like it was designed with a Geocities easy-page-creator. Oh, and the first thing you see is a story about a Turkey Testicle Festival, complete with picture.

    --
    my password is private, but unchanged.
  55. From TFA by Steamhead · · Score: 2

    > An ad-free 100 GByte email account will be priced at $150 per year.

    Seems conveniently priced at the price of a hard drive plus a decent amount of bandwidth, now if you are making an archive of quite a few mailing lists this may be worth it, however If I really needed this much space, I'd just host it myself.

  56. hriders.com by pmsyyz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Worst website EVAR.

    --
    Phillip
    1. Re:hriders.com by Talking+Toaster · · Score: 1

      How can they talk about a hellride without talking about Corwin?

      --
      Howdy Doodly Doo!
      Anybody want some Toast?
  57. has to be a joke or something by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    they even advertise a turkey testicle festival... cmon. please. slashdot this out of existence!

  58. Fillme! by fenodyree · · Score: 1

    With a boasting such as: "Site hosted with 100% solar energy" Here's hoping the sun is still shining on that poor server's solar collectors. Especially since I just registered Fillme@hriders.com ;-)

  59. No no no... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I meant someone go SIGN UP for an HRiders email account... because that's the whole point; you've got to send mail to it to win the 1TB account.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  60. but how about the long run? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    and just how long do you think this company is going to be around, taking care of your emails while promising everything to everyone?

    I'll settle for a little less storage, from a stable provider with a sound business and IT plan, thanks.

  61. Who needs that type of space really? by Schwing84 · · Score: 0

    Imagine how long it would take for ur account to fill up if you subscribe to porn sites. Who really needs that much space.

  62. Yeah, it's too bad... by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    And the down side to this is what exactly?

  63. Bikers and Penises... by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

    It appears that Google has started the email equivalent of a penis contest.

    Bikers and Penis's --- they go well together now don't they? I remember a song saying something about "having big balls", and I remember people with mostly long hair listening to it also...

    1. Re:Bikers and Penises... by slarshdot · · Score: 1

      that would be AC/DC's big balls

      Some balls are held for charity
      And some for fancy dress
      But when they're held for pleasure
      They're the balls that I like best
      My balls are always bouncing
      To the left and to the right
      It's my belief that my big balls
      Should be held every night

      --

      I'm not out of order! You're out of order! The whole freaking system's out of order!
  64. Problem by mark-t · · Score: 1

    You just broke the law in step 2.

    1. Re:Problem by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I don't see what law was broken if they are solicited mails...

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    2. Re:Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I though it was broke trying to find 25 friends :rolleyes:

    3. Re:Problem by jbrw · · Score: 1

      You might want to apply some lube before the MPAA finds you...

    4. Re:Problem by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I was still thinking of it as just media files... wasn't thinking of any sort of legality.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  65. More reasonable color scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  66. I could fill it... by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    I just upgraded my home file server. 4 x 200GB WD IDE drives on a 3Ware card at RAID 5, giving me 540GB of space (each drive formatted down to 180GB).

    Anyways, my pr0n drive alone was over 150GB (yeah, I know). All I'd have to do is bring the server into work, stick it on the T1, configure QOS on the router to give my box preference (good to be the admin), and let er rip.

    Anybody know how long it would take to upload 100gb at 1.5mb/sec?

    1. Re:I could fill it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody know how long it would take to upload 100gb at 1.5mb/sec?

      Gee that's a toughie...hmmm...

      Assuming 100% throughput...
      100 gb X 1000mb/gb X 8 bits/byte / 1.5mb/sec = 533333 seconds or about 6 days

      Assuming less than 100% output...let's say roughly 8 days.

  67. hrfs by JuggleThis · · Score: 1

    Hmm... 1 TB, eh?
    I smell a Hellacious Riders File System module...

  68. Not so wierd by photon317 · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I think Google (or anyone) shouldn't have a problem just giving people "unlimited" email space (and then whacking abuser accounts who mount gmail-based filesystems to store terabytes of pr0n...). For legitimate users of the system:

    1) It's text, compress it, save space.

    2) If you have a large user base, chances are there are many duplicate emails floating around the system. Hash everyone's email body-content globally. Then when that stupid email gets forwarded to 6000 of your customers, it only gets stored once for each unique form it arrives in. Ditto for mailing list emails.

    3) Make sure that your spam filter is really good, and especially that it never falses tosses legit emails, so that people trust it. Anything that's in the spam box gets autokilled in a week.

    4) Limit attachments to reasonable sizes. You're trying to stop people from email-attaching a 700MB uncompressed cd rip, or whatever. Gmail currently limits the entire message, all attachments included, to 10MB in size. They do other stupid things too though, like not letting you send zipfiles... A better system that leaves more freedom for the user might be to say that all attachment types are legal, but if a message's total length exceeds 10MB, then attachments in it will be "flagged for deletion", starting with the largest attachment in the message first, until the number is under 10MB. These larger "flagged for deletion" attachments get forceably deleted from your email archives after 24 hours, or 3 days, or something of that nature. In this way you can still transport large files via email, you just can't archive them there.

    Once those simple measures are in place, you can largely rely on statistics and reasonability. If a reasonably average webmail user actually received and archived over a gig of mail in a year under such a system I'd be impressed.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:Not so wierd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2) If you have a large user base, chances are there are many duplicate emails floating around the system. Hash everyone's email body-content globally. Then when that stupid email gets forwarded to 6000 of your customers, it only gets stored once for each unique form it arrives in. Ditto for mailing list emails.
      This moves the problem from being 6000 individual files to remove to being 6000 individual records to maintain for one file. Considering that most messages are sent to one or two users tops, I'm betting even on Hotmail, this is a waste.

      3) Make sure that your spam filter is really good, and especially that it never falses tosses legit emails, so that people trust it. Anything that's in the spam box gets autokilled in a week.
      If you can write a really good spam filter that never gets false positives, you're miles ahead of the rest of the world.
    2. Re:Not so wierd by oshy · · Score: 1

      "They do other stupid things too though, like not letting you send zipfiles.." Do they allow any atachments? Could use a program to convert files manually to UUE and paste them in. You could also use a program to hide the file type (rename it to piz and do a ROT128 on all bytes)

    3. Re:Not so wierd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, zip files are not banned, I have sent many many many zipfiles both to and from christopher.watford@gmail.com

    4. Re:Not so wierd by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      A better system that leaves more freedom for the user might be to say that all attachment types are legal, but if a message's total length exceeds 10MB, then attachments in it will be "flagged for deletion", starting with the largest attachment in the message first, until the number is under 10MB. These larger "flagged for deletion" attachments get forceably deleted from your email archives after 24 hours, or 3 days, or something of that nature.

      I would guess that google spends much more on bandwidth than it does on hard drive space. It costs about $0.05 to transfer a gig of data. For that cost you could store the data for 90 days (given a 5 year hard drive life).

      And remember, google makes money based on the number of ads you view, which is related to the number of emails you read, not the size of those emails. Limiting attachment size is quite directly in google's best interest.

    5. Re:Not so wierd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think Google (or anyone) shouldn't have a problem just giving people "unlimited" email space (and then whacking abuser accounts who mount gmail-based filesystems to store terabytes of pr0n...). For legitimate users of the system:

      I would think that part of the problem here would be defining "abuse". Needing to employ people to scan user accounts, looking for large mailboxes and high bandwidth consumption, needing to discover what is in those mailboxes, having to create a policy on what is 'legitimate' and what is 'abuse', etc. It all takes a larger level of administration.

      Once those simple measures are in place, you can largely rely on statistics and reasonability. If a reasonably average webmail user actually received and archived over a gig of mail in a year under such a system I'd be impressed.

      In fact, all of these services offering 1GB of e-mail are relying on the fact that not every user will use the full gig. I have 2 gmail accounts, and probably a kilobyte between them (all text). The problem is, I think, that Google is a very high-profile company, and needs to be careful with what it offers. First, being high-profile means that if you offer free unlimited space, there will be a lot of people trying to figure out how to abuse it.

      Second, if you mess up, and you fail to live up to your offer, or if you, for any reason, retract an offer, it'll ruin your reputation. Even if the problem is caused by abuse, people will complain endlessly "Hey, why did Google retract their unlimited space? I loved that!" or "Google is so stupid. Didn't they know offering [whatever] would cause problems?!" So, they have to be careful. I can understand that.

  69. ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can win the 1tb account by subscribing to all mailing lists of the world.

  70. ...soon we'll see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at the bottom of a few select /. ers posts...

    Get a free rack of X Serves, Not a scam! Sign up now, offering 1TB Hellacious invite

  71. I would use a few megs by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    Just for archiving important documents (I'm a student, no porn jokes!). But gigs, I don't know. I have a gmail account, but I still use my school's account they gave me. Never trust your hard drive for the important stuff, I always feel. So large email accounts are useful, but this is over the top.

  72. I do believe by bigberk · · Score: 1

    That email is looking more and more like an attractive P2P interface for file sharing. I think this would be a convenient way to share files. Encrypt and send them to mailboxes, pick them up at your convenience.

    While the base64 encoding isn't terribly efficient for space, an interesting characteristic of email is that multiple recipients at the same domain - say gmail.com, benefit from a single data transmission to gmail's server delivering the mail to several destination accounts. So for the first time we could have a P2P app with 'multicast'-like content delivery.

  73. ln -s /var/spool /dev/null by juliao · · Score: 1
    ln -s /var/spool /dev/null
    Or was it the other way around??
  74. And it's all for SPAM by timdorr · · Score: 1

    Up to today, Weiss has signed up 52 million users in countries - a number which he wants to grow significantly to be recognized as record: "We would like to be included in the Guinness Book of Records for the world's largest mailing list," he said.

    Well, count me out. This is obviously a grab for attention, not to provide a legitimate service.

    --
    Tim Dorr
    Owner/Manger
    A Small Orange
  75. Privacy by OrangeTwitch · · Score: 1

    You might archive stuff there but don't forget that attachments still count as email so the owners can still snoop and do whatever they want with your data.

  76. Compression by cjsnell · · Score: 1

    I wonder if free e-mail providers are using compression to make the provision of free 1GB+ accounts possible. Most e-mail is quite compressable. The only problem I see would be the CPU overhead of the compression/decompression. I've seen SSL accellerator PCI cards and HTTP compression PCI-X cards but I don't think I've ever seen a card that can do offloaded gzip compression.

    Chris

  77. Uh-huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
    /dev/ad0s1f 31G 16G 12G 56% 58278 962072 6% /home

  78. Rip? Lets see how long. by microsopht · · Score: 0
    Yeah, they've forced other free e-mail providers to compete, and the consumers are benefiting. What a rip.
    Rip? Lets see how long. One fine day, one of the providers will says due to escalating costs the service is no longer free and you have to pay for it or lose your account and all your emails will be deleted if you dont pay within 3 months!

    And one by one all other providers would follow suit.....

    [ or worst if they cant cope up the smaller ones will close]

    1. Re:Rip? Lets see how long. by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Come now, it's not so hard to use cut-and-paste though. :)

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
  79. Suggestion for Gmail... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    ...if they aren'talready doing this. But from what I hear,text compresses fairly well. So... up the Gmail account quotas by compressing the text of the messages and you will have raised the bar yet again. On the fly compression should be a part of all mail filesystems.

  80. Hey... by maiku · · Score: 1

    ...didn't Richard Pryor do something like this in Brewster's Millions?

  81. Somewhere in Redmond today... by g3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...an unnamed software company executive was overheard saying "1 GB ought to be enough for anyone." (A subsqeunt discussion was spawned discussing whether or not he actually said it.)

  82. Did you say SPAM? by juliao · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know an address there? I'd gladly re-send them all the spam I get - that should fill the 100 Gb...

  83. Obligatory Dr. Evil quote by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you use our service, you'll get...one hundred billion GB of email!!!!

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  84. No, you dont understand, this is GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What Google has done (And this is clearly the proof) is complteley nullified the point of storage space. I can remember 3 years ago having a free 6 MB yahoo account. But now, everyone has been forced for the sake of compensation, to upgrade to 500mb+

    Now, it is safe to say that for 99%+ of the population, a free account with half a gig of storage space is plenty. 100 GB is obviously the definition of "Overkill". So no longer is storage space even an ISSUE. Now when looking at email providers, we can judge them on

    A. Interface
    B. Spam Filters
    C. Extra bonuses
    D. Etc etc etc

    Effectivley, Google has eliminated the need to choose email providers based on storage space, and has forced providers to concentrate on things that REALLY matter! (I dont know about you, but I HATE it when a spam email evades the filters! Every new REAL email, to me anyways, feels like christmas morning just not as cool)

  85. only person left? by itallushrt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only person left that still prefers to NOT leave email on someone elses server and POP it instead??????????

    My GMail account is basically useless as is because I don't want to use the Pop Goes The Gmail Hack.

    1. Re:only person left? by KillerHamster · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I do that too. Of course, my school only gives me a few MB of space and I get 50 or so emails a day, often with attachments. I forward stuff to my Gmail account if I know I'll need to get to it when I'm away from my computer, and I back up my Thunderbird mail folder every few days.

    2. Re:only person left? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      I believe you are. I think the world is now divided between people using webmail and people using IMAP to get at their e-mail. AFAIK nobody in their right minds uses POP any more. ;-)

      I pay $40 a year for a 2GB enhanced account with fastmail.fm. They combine an excellent web interface with IMAP access. All my mail ends up there, forwarded or not.

    3. Re:only person left? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      AFAIK nobody in their right minds uses POP any more. ;-)
      Was that meant to be a faceticious remark or is there a real reason to prefer IMAP over POP?

    4. Re:only person left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How do you backup your mail from thunderbird? Do you just bz2 your files and mail them to you or is there a better way of doing it?

      I'd love to have a tool that forwards all my mail to gmail as long as the to: from: and datestamps are kept... dunno, maybe i should try some python loops on my mailboxes. Read, forward, delete, then repeat...

    5. Re:only person left? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      You stumped me with your 'faceticious'. English is not my first language so I tried dictionary.com and google, which returned 0 vs. 91 hits. I guess you must have spelled something wrong, there...

      IMAP is a superset of POP, so it's bound to be better from an end user point of view. It really shows when you combine it with web-access because you'll have the exact same view of your folders in your e-mail client. I mostly use Thunderbird to access my mail, but I use fastmail's webmail whenever I'm not on my own system. Incoming mail is automatically sorted into folders upon arrival on the *server*.

      IMAP can be tuned to broadband connections like ADSL at home, where I just sync everything, and narrowband connections like my PDA via GPRS that just retrieves the new messages from each incoming folder by default.

      These are just a few applications that are either impossible with POP or really hard to do. Get a free fastmail.fm account to try it out if you're interested.

      The disadvantages of IMAP are mostly on the side of the provider. It requires more storage, processing power, and backup capacity. That's the reason most normal ISP's don't offer it. You have to go to a specialist.

  86. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well my .Mac account was upgraded to 250MB between webstorage and email today. Attachments were upped to 10MB.

    I guess its not like I'm going to go over 250MB, and atleast there aren't bots (that I know of) combing over the keywords in my mail. Spam filtering is execellent as well.

  87. 1 GB May Not Be Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had a Gmail account since approximately May of this year. In normal use, I have already filled up 12% of the inbox. I don't email huge photos or files around, I don't get spam in that account (yet), and I am already starting to worry.

    1GB seemed limitless at first compared to my previous Yahoo! Mail account, but after not deleting any email for five months, it is beginning to show it's limitations. If my usage increases or stays the same, I will fill to capacity in roughly four years. Even less if I start emailing and receiving digital photos. My previous internet email address I had for almost eight years.

  88. Who? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Who do you have to blow to get an invite?

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  89. Yawn by astrotek · · Score: 1

    Any decent sysadmin can fill the mail account in 8 hours or less with a 10mbit connect. So I could do it in 2 hours... if I cared.

  90. spamtrap of course by lemody · · Score: 1

    "Now to figure out what those bikers actually need all that space for...."

    to build the biggest SPAMTRAP ever :)

    --


    class he-man extends man!
  91. How on earth could anyone possibly need a hundred gigabytes of remote storage! The only data formats around that have an excuse to reach that size are hours of hifi video or the transaction database of a large corporation. What possible use could an ordinary user have for it?

    Seriously... How much space does your non-spam e-mail take up?

  92. What is left? WHAT IS LEFT! by TeaQuaffer · · Score: 1

    OK, now bikers have bigger email accounts than I do. They already have everything I don't, muscles, babes, big fast bikes, respect, fear.... But I am running SuSE 9.1 and that makes me cool, right? right? anyone?

    --
    Sola Deo Gloria!
  93. Easy to fill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Port GmailFS to new mail system
    2) mount /mnt/emailfs
    3) for a in `seq -w 1 100`; do dd bs=1024 count=1048576 if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/emailfs/bigfile.$a; done
    4) 1tb offline storage!
    5) Profit

  94. In case noone noticed... by alexbartok · · Score: 2, Informative

    if you RTFA, they want a whoppin 150$/year for ad-free 100GB.
    To me that only makes sense for businesses, but then again, which business would need 100GB without being able to afford their own/co-located/hosted mailserver ?
    I'd personally rather stick with gmail and use AdMuncher. Works like a charme.

  95. Easy. Uncompressed video. by myov · · Score: 1

    DV video is approx 1GB for every 5 minutes. Fire up a capture session (even if it's color bars or something), slice it up and email away.

    Bonus points if you have access to something that does even less compression.

    I doubt my broadband provider would like me though.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  96. Fill My Box by multimed · · Score: 1
    I bet Kevin Rose from TechTV could hit fill 100GB pretty quick if he mentioned it on TV again. Then again nobody watches anymore since they killed TechTV by merging with G4...but anyway, for a gutwrenching laugh check out the video. If you've seen in, watch it again, every time it still has me rolling...

    Fill My Box

    --
    Vote Quimby.
  97. Stupid Name by UnkyHerb · · Score: 1

    I visited the website and couldn't bare the horrendious design for more than 2 minutes, it looked like a redneck shit it out. I didn't sign up but if my email has to end in @hriders.com or even more stupid @hellaciousriders.com than that's just too much to bare. Chances are it's not going to be fast anyway.

    --
    Your Momma's so fat she makes emacs look like nano!
  98. 100GB? by CptnSbaitso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their site now reads "free 10GB email account".

    Make sure you check the "I agree to give away my soul" box.

  99. bikers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now to figure out what those bikers actually need all that space for...."

    Bikers???? Where do bikers come into this?

  100. not msn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're confusing MSN with Yahoo! mail accounts for paid subscribers. Also Spymac offers at least 1 Gig free (check /. archives for more info.)

  101. Re:100gb mail? just give me the stinkin drive! by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

    Personally I think they are realling in part on high compression ratios that can be obtained with text.
    Think about it , 1% of 100gb is only 1gb .
    With the cost of hard drive space that works out to slightly less than $1 (assuming no backups).
    Considering the large amount of adds shouldnt be hard for them (so long as they limmit attachments hard core).

  102. Not bad by NuTTyGuY · · Score: 0

    Shes got small tits, but her body aint that bad.

  103. What about the GUI? by Wizarth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, every-one signed up with GMail for the 1GB of Mail. But every-one I know who's used it, sticks with it for the GUI. It's so fast and easy to use. Thats the real power of GMail.

    1. Re:What about the GUI? by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      I agree. GMail's UI is the only webmail UI I can stand.

      Also, GMail at least attempts spam filtering. It's not as good as SA + POPfile, but it's pretty close.

  104. Hmm Odd by berenelen · · Score: 1

    I live around Irvine and there are tons of bikers already. You spend an hour driving around here and you'll run into at least three different biker groups each with an average of twenty members. Its not like they'd actually use the account... they'd spend too much time biking...

    --
    ~ nomes/berenelen/beren/bere/etc...
  105. It's a pr0n phishing scam by Feanturi · · Score: 1, Funny

    And a really clever one at that, dammit they beat me to it!

  106. seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have gmail, and I couldn't tell you what is so awesome either.

    It has some fancy HTML, but it doesn't really add much to the site. It's a mess. It works I guess.

    1. Re:seriously by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The search is nice, and it's much faster than searching my local hard drive. The "folders" concept is good, but it doesn't work right. The ads are rather non-intrusive, but POP/IMAP would be better. The autothreading is good in concept, but it doesn't work right all the time.

      In the end, the space is the reason I use gmail as my main email account. If hotmail ever upgrades my account to 250 megs I'll probably switch back to them, because at least I can access it using outlook express and hotmail popper. Alternatively, maybe gmail will fix the problems I'm experiencing. It is beta, after all.

  107. another problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disregarding the law and everything, the maximum attachment size in gmail is 10 megabytes.

  108. Misinformed - Only 10gb not 100gb by Agret · · Score: 1

    Upon visting the site http://www.hriders.com/ looking at the top left reveals you only get a 10gb mailbox not a 100gb as previously stated.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:Misinformed - Only 10gb not 100gb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops! Maybe they're running low on disk space?

  109. Can you imagine how long... by innerweb · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...Getting your mail would take if your pop reader decides to redownload everything?

    InnerWeb

    --
    Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
  110. The next spam scam by Finkbug · · Score: 1

    "Yes, but fortunately (or unfortunately?) penises aren't growing at the rate that mailboxes are. Size is good up to a point, but a 1Tb penis would make it hard to walk. It would have to be on a dedicated server, so to speak."

    Ernie Smith, Don't be dragged down!

    Increase your penile support appartatus (sic) 200%! All natural! ancint (sic) herbal tretment (sic) of Nigerian Princes!

    --
    Feeling so good natured I could drool
  111. Re: by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

    Sure, but only until somebody recodes the MyDoom virus to send out the Windows XP Starter edition as an attachment to every e-mail in lookOut. Now THAT would be an interesting project....*rubs hands with glee in anticipation*

  112. Terms and condition by ganhawk · · Score: 1

    I dont think this applies to the email. But it shows up while signing up for email in terms and conditions. If they do intend to apply it for email, it sould ridiculous.

    "
    10. Proprietary Rights.
    (a) By posting content on the HELLACIOUSRIDERS.COM Website, you grant HELLACIOUSRIDERS.COM a worldwide, royalty-free non-exclusive license to (i) host, use, reproduce, modify, distribute, transmit, combine with information provided by third parties, and publicly display such content on and through the HELLACIOUSRIDERS.COM Website, and in HELLACIOUSRIDERS.COM's promotional or advertising materials, and (ii) sublicense to third parties such content to the extent necessary for the creation and maintenance of, in part or in whole, such sites."

    --
    Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
  113. MS is not at 2GB, stop being a MS drone by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0, Troll
    Hell they only recently started the upgrade to 250mb wich they had promised a long time ago. One of the usual hype then delay tactics of MS, it works for people like you apparently.

    For the rest of us what counts is what is actually being offered to users at this moment.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:MS is not at 2GB, stop being a MS drone by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Way to take something out of context and miss the point of the whole post.

      What matters is the fact that they're promising "more email space than gmail!" and expecting people to think that it's BETTER because of that, when it actually makes little difference.

      If I was pointing that out as an _advantage_, I wouldn't be making fun of the people promising 100 GB, Bright One.

  114. illegalz by kilox · · Score: 1

    with 500MB attatchements, the piracy rings will love that for warez.

  115. Size limit by EvilNutSack · · Score: 1

    What is the size limit per email sent? If it's unlimited I'm pretty sure I can reach that 100GB plateau with my Jenna Jameson collection...

    --
    --
    1. Re:Size limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  116. mp3 storage by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Interesting
    email each mp3 file to yourself as a separate email. In the subject line label it artist / title / XX song title.

    This way, where ever you go, your tunage is on tap. It might takea while to DL, but so what! I know if my house was ravaged by some Tornado or Hurricane, and all my CDs were blown to flinders or washed out to sea, I would definitely appreciate the back up...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:mp3 storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know if my house was ravaged by some Tornado or Hurricane, and all my CDs were blown to flinders or washed out to sea, I would definitely appreciate the back up...

      This is a great idea for those who live in Florida.

    2. Re:mp3 storage by Project2501a · · Score: 1
      Dude. Tornado Alley. Trailer parks. CDs????


      Even so, do you appreciate your John Denver CDs *that* much?

      --
      ----
  117. I know I'm not average... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Or at least my girlfriend tells me I'm well above average...

    But I'm already 8% into my 2 GB two months into the new expanded Yahoo. At this rate, I'll have used up my 2 gig at 26 months or so.

    One part of this post is true, and one false. Can you guess which is which?

    1. Re:I know I'm not average... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your on /. you CAN'T have a girlfriend. Therefor the 8% email usage must be true.

  118. AOL, anyone? by Belsical · · Score: 1

    Internet email is starting to remind me of the way internet access was about a decade ago. At first it was AOL with 20 hours a month, then it was slowly upped, and eventually it was just "eh screw it, unlimited."

    By the way, AOL's since fixed it, but for awhile the number of hours they gave away during their first month was actually more than a 31 day month contained. Not that their users were smart enough to pick that up anyway.

    It's nice to see that storage is getting so cheap; I don't think it will be much longer before internet email has unlimited storage for free. If any, I think the extra cost will be based on features.

    --

    "There are no such things as mutual fantasies. Yours bore us and ours offend you."
    - Bill Maher
    1. Re:AOL, anyone? by LegionX · · Score: 1

      My mail-provider (www.freepaq.dk) have had unlimited email/web-space for years. And IMAP access :)

  119. Why wont people ever learn? by nunofgs · · Score: 0

    It's not the size that matters... it's what you do with it!

  120. proper use of email by majid_aldo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    email was never meant to be a means for file transfer. I wish people would send me links instead of huge attachments. (this is just one among other misuses of email)

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  121. Hotmail by 3.09+a+hour · · Score: 1

    Gmail, Please. I bet it doesnt have 50 ads all over it no one but a 14 year old girl whould be interested in! Who needs a good gui?

    --
    Like the saying goes, never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes. -Pyrotic
  122. Yeah, lots mail space, but by tfoss · · Score: 1
    a Turkey Testicle Festival?

    Seriously... on their front page.

    -Ted

    --
    -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    1. Re:Yeah, lots mail space, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a Turkey Testicle Festival?

      Sounds like bollocks to me.

  123. disturbing story.. by sonictheboom · · Score: 0

    The site has a story titled "26th Annual Turkey Testicle Festival" with a picture of a tray, half empty. http://www.hriders.com/freepictures.asp?category=S potlight%201

    :-(

    Now I'm assuming that the festival is to do with large avians, not the country, but its still quite disturbing.

  124. this sounds like a ploy by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    Its always interesting when you see companies come out with ideas like this that are clearly not really a viable solution.

    I know that I am on several very very busy mailing lists that recieve around 7000 emails a week through. Even on several of these lists it would take me a years at least to fill up even 10% of the 100gb space. So let me ask.. Why would the average person want a 1TB email account.

    Sounds like a good way to distribute warez and other pirate software. Just give your mates access to your email account. Perfect place to store all your backups as well. Maybe this is the solution we have always been looking for as a home user disaster recovery setup.

    Hard drive just crashed. install the OS and download your .tar.gz backup files. Works a treat im sure.

    if even 10,000 people filled even half of thier space the company would be broke ;0

  125. turkey testicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would anyone interested in turkey testicles even know what a gigabyte is?

  126. Where has the common sense gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you think lying to people is a good business strategy. You'll only look a fool when you have to retract your claims when geeks start using the service as a virtual filesystem or whatever else they can think of using 1 Tb online storage for.

    Common sense doesn't seem so common anymore, but foolishness abound. But I think it's always been this way though. Why not have some spine and integrity, and do good for your customers, not trying to cheat everybody for your own gain?

    1. Re:Where has the common sense gone? by microsopht · · Score: 1
      So you think lying to people is a good business strategy.
      When did I say lie?
      Because you of your prejudice you read it the wrong way.
      All I said was that ,1 TB of space doesnt need to be allocated to a user immediately after he signs up.Whats the point of allocating 1 TB for every account created when all the user used was few MB's?Wont the rest of the valuable disk space go waste?

      Infact be it Gmail or Yahoo or anyone, you thought they cordon off 1 GB of space in their hardisk in the new user id a user creates?

      Truth is the promised space is offered to all users , when they use it.

      No one is thinking of cheating users.Only you are.

  127. Uh-oh by gwoodrow · · Score: 1

    This is one of those ideas that necessitates the saying, "This can't end well..." In my mind's eye I see an entire server farm smoking and melting and the team from the TV show CSI walking in and going, "So what happened here?"

  128. Uhh.. Duh? by piecewise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Questioning the use of a 100GB email space?

    To backup my 100 gmail accounts, DUH.

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  129. used to do this on aol by emmons · · Score: 1

    Back in the good 'ol days, there used to be a very active warez scene on AOL... it worked by taking advantage of the fact that AOL would keep one copy of an uploaded email attachment on their server, regardless of how many times it was forwarded.

    What people did was break up files into 1mb zips, email them to themselves, and then be able to forward those emails to who ever wanted them. All being within the same email system, they arrived instantly. Bots were created to automate it and chat rooms were set up to facilitate requests from anyone. Those were the days...

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  130. Re:just think.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah cuz the following porn jokes were just so hilarious!!

  131. your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like dead New Yorkers, thank Democrats.

  132. 2 MB from Hotmail, not 1 by YowzaTheYuzzum · · Score: 1

    Hotmail previously had 2 MB, not 1. Still pitiful, but you know...

    1. Re:2 MB from Hotmail, not 1 by smacktits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It still is only 2mb. Well, for me anyway. And I've had my @hotmail since about 1998.

    2. Re:2 MB from Hotmail, not 1 by Obfiscator · · Score: 1
      I've had mine since 1998 as well, and I noticed a week or so ago it went up to 250MB. That was nice, since a week before that I opened a gmail account.

      I'm never gonna fill up the quotas on either of those, but they're just spam addresses.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  133. Different proposal by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

    How about in exchange for thie 100GB email space, they just give me the storage space delivered and I can use it locally? Ummkay

  134. Re:You mean to say... by alchemistkevin · · Score: 1

    100GB will be enough for everybody...?

  135. What about searching mails? by MHleads · · Score: 1

    Does it have great search capabilities like google? Lack of good tool will render this monstrous mailbox useless.

  136. Complete con artist, too small by far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Sir

    I was reading your offer of email account space.

    Your offer:

    1000000 bytes

    What you CAN offer:

    1024*1024 = 1048576

    Dude, you short changed me by 48576 bytes.

    DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH THAT IS!!!!!!11!

    Yours faithfully

    Teh ZX spectrum users

  137. Slashdot effect - google cache by alchemistkevin · · Score: 1

    looks like their site is already suffering from the now-infamous soon-to-be-included-in-dictionary term: slashdot effect. google cache is here

    The registration page (that doesn't open up anymore) is here.

  138. Easy to fill up 100gb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make your email account name "VoteForBush" or "BushForPresident" and I'm sure liberals will find a way to spamazoid the poor guy.

    _lB_

  139. mis-information by nilbog · · Score: 1

    I went to the site (www.hriders.com) that is offering the "100 gig" email accounts. Unless they're working in a base one-hundred system I'm pretty sure they're only giving away ten gig accounts. That is significantly less than advertised. p.s. Don't bother correcting my base one-hundred joke with your "math" and "logic". a.) I don't care, and b.) you got it anyway.

    --
    or else!
  140. Home Hotmail by naubol · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "The first user who is able to use the complete space will receive from us a free email account with one TByte space on a dedicated server," Weiss said. "This will be the worlds largest email inbox."


    What about my 250 gigabyte hard drive? I could slap an email server on that and beat this. Also they're charging 150 dollars for 100g a year? I paid less for my hard drive.


    Which leads me to my next thought, why not write an open source web interface and buy a static ip for your home (for us nerds) and a domain (most of us already have both), and then throw a hard drive on it (250 gig is affordable.). Put a webserver and the appropriate email server.... A lot of work at first but could be a lot easier to setup via rpm or something. Then you could leave your "server" on all the time and check your email away from home. No ads either.


    N

    --
    Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
  141. "the number that matters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I agree.

    > because they don't really care for their customers, just to sell their product.

    I don't think they don't care for their customers: the last time they polled them, they said "WE WANT MORE STORAGE CAPACITY" !

    But the consumer isn't a complete idiot: the email storage capacity is now overshooting his needs. So his revendications don't stand anymore.

    Every time this happens, the consumer's criterions shift: Google killed the storage capacity war for the Gmail-like's features to be the criterion that matters.

    Companies still pursuing the storage war are generally well led and listen to the yesterday's consumer claims.
    When they wake, they'll be a-drift.

    Managing innovation is tough. Otherwise good managers used to not grasp it.

    1. Re:"the number that matters" by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I see, wasn't aware of such a poll.

      Yes, then it's more a case of listening to customers and looking at trends instead of innovating. While that's slightly better, they won't be the winning company, unless they already dominate the market a lot.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  142. Terminal by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    With such storage capacity, (1TB inbox, that's more then I have locally on my PC) it'd be superneat to be able to login on your 1TB space and use it as an external harddrive, saving all the personal bandwidth, which still isn't free.

    After 15G/month it's over for me, and my broadband gets capped until the month is over.

    It's like webfolders used to be, but bigger, and free appearantly. Is this the beginning of where people buy a cheap terminal machine with a silly browser and have an "online harddrive"?

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  143. Profit, inside a conspiracy by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    I wonder if their EULA allows certain people to look at emails or large files, or if this company is owned or funded by one of the various MPAA/RIAA companies.

    Then take said company and challenge people to fill up this enormous space. How do they expect you to do that? What kind of files take up that kind of space?

    Movies, Audio, CD Images, Data Backup (No one in their right mind would trust this one to an email account)

    Why get $10 on rental when you can pop someone for a couple thousand on copyright violation.

  144. Keep your 100GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll make due w/ 100MB, just filter out the damn spam.

  145. lol yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if 100 thousand people filled up 100gb out of the 60 million users...

    100k x 100gb = 10 exabytes of space, which would cost about 50 million dollars for the servers alone at like 2k a server (yeah right)

  146. Did it drop to 10 gig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just went there and saw this...

    JOIN NOW!!
    (free 10gb email account)

    That didn't last long.

  147. Compression? What compression? by shokk · · Score: 1

    So I'm thinking that these companies are all using some wild compression algorithms on these mailboxes in order to provide us with all this space, so that we really aren't using 1GB on GMail or 2GB on Yahoo Mail. Can't wait for the corruption to creep in. I wonder what Google's corporate policy is on buying systems with or without ECC?

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  148. Free GMail Accounts by Leslea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm the Female Gmail Account Wh0re!

    Get them while they're hot!

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-d0a871b093-09dbe f2 457-472a162c97

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-d0a871b093-c6294 13 0a7-c16aa04a1d

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-d0a871b093-83d0a d2 281-93d51c8b6f

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-d0a871b093-d8018 78 f88-dba5e1c925

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-d0a871b093-e3596 67 3be-bef5fb41f2

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-d0a871b093-10028 04 77c-26fea67ba3

    Be quick before they're gone!

    --
    - Leslea
    1. Re:Free GMail Accounts by Leslea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Grrr. Slashcode appears to be putting a space in the url, so please make sure you REMOVE the space from the url before going to it, else google thinks the url is invalid or expired. Thanks.

      --
      - Leslea
  149. Who read the article? by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    It is just a marketing stunt by a motorcycle magazine! You think they have the technical talent to make it through a year of operation, or to deal with the spam and DOS attacks that such services draw? I would think such an email account was a lifetime deal since it would take me a lifetime to fill it up and I would deed it off to my grandchildren for all the heirloom emails it would come to contain. Google has that sort of staying power...I hope. Also, where in the article is any link to a page that would let you sign up for this service? Its one thing to get a market buzz by SAYING you will give out 100GB accounts [buzz being the clear motive for this stunt] and another to make it easy for large numbers of people to actually take you up on the offer.

    I am claiming Copyright on this SIG so you cannot make a copy of it to rat on me to the authorities because it is also offensive. I ask you to engage your ISP's filth-filter if you are younger than 18. Between DRM and prudery, we will wind up filling our 100GB with blanks or the word "CENSORED".
    So you wanna wag dicks huh? "Cheney, Cheney, Cheney!" Top that!

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  150. Hmmm... Do I see this correctly? by beh · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first who manages to port gmailfs to their site, and uploads the first 100GB of data to his gmailfs partition gets a free 1TB remote storage account?

    Hmmmm.... Hmmmm.... Let's have a look at this gmailfs code again... ;-)

    But - even if it's a 100GB, gmailfs over that alone could be very interesting...

    Though I can't wait for the day, when we'll have the first gmailfs[gmail.com]+gmailfs[hriders.com] RAID-1 setup for backup. ;-)

  151. uh huh by fizban · · Score: 1

    What none of these providers are telling you is that 3/4 of that storage space will be filled with spam that you'll start receiving after they've sold your email address to the world to pay for it.

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  152. Re:100gb mail? just give me the stinkin drive! by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Considering that you can get a 120GB SATA drive for about $100 these days, it's not really costing them all that much (yeah... sparse, compression, all that goodness). And if Tom's Hardware is correct: "An ad-free 100 GByte email account will be priced at $150 per year", they'll even make money at those prices.

    I think someone should come up with a 1TB email service for $99/year. Make everything RAID5 or RAID6, guaranteed backups, etc. etc. and watch the money roll in. By the time people start using up that much email, storage will be dirt cheap anyways.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  153. ummm... copyright? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Sonny Bono owns you.

    That is all.

  154. 'Twould appear you're not a UFie by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't consider a site "user friendly" unless it has Dust Puppy on it. "Easy to learn" and "easy to use" on the other hand...

  155. When..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder when they will be giving away t-shirts and candybars for me using their service.

  156. 1 Terabyte = 1,024 Gigabyte (GB) not 100 by feross101 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it just me or did no other geek catch on to this?

  157. Too bad it really doesn't matter by jbarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gmail's strength is certainly NOT its capacity, but how its fast interface, Labels, Conversations, and Search capabilities leverage that capacity. Mailbox size is really nothing more than an abused marketing point.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  158. So what? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    I've been having a 240 gigabyte e-mail account ever since I put two 120 gig drives on my mail server...

  159. I need someplace I can put my spam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need someplace I can put my spam./

  160. Eggcorn Alert! by TobyWong · · Score: 1

    It's panty _waisted_ as in your waist showing the evidence of someone who wears panties.

    --
    - Toby
  161. 10Gb !!! by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    Okay ...

    I went to the web site ...
    I registered for the 100Gb account ...
    I'm still waiting for my auto-confirmation ...
    Now the site says ...
    There's now a 10Gb limit !!!

    I want my 100Gb's dammmmit ;)

    Cheers,
    -- The Dude

  162. The only relevant question is... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    Is Hriders.com going to be AROUND in five years, or have they overextended and set themselves up for a good, old-fashion dot-com crash? And will they take all of my emails down with them in a blaze of glory?

    100 GB doesn't mean squat if they don't have some financial muscle behind them. Google, I trust to be around. Hriders.com, I'm not sure about.

  163. Facetious by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    The adjective "facetious" has 1 sense in WordNet. 1. bantering, facetious, tongue-in-cheek -- (cleverly amusing in tone; "a bantering tone"; "facetious remarks"; "tongue-in-cheek advice") Interestingly, it uses all of the English vowels A, E, I, O, U in the order they appear in the alphabet.

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
    1. Re:Facetious by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      Now why does Slashdot default my replie to HTML?? USE PREVIEW! D'OH!

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
  164. Give one to Kevin Rose by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    On "The Screensavers" a while back, Kevin Rose gave out his gmail address and asked viewers to fill it, so they could see what happens when you hit your limit on gmail. It filled very quickly.

    I think TSS viewers could do 100 GB in an hour or so.

  165. Do it 10 times? by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    In a night? Probably not without some Astroglide.

  166. Hogwash by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Google's policy has been "you'll neve rhave to delete any email". I thought id' give it a go. I am on 5 high traffic MLs and a few others. Until now I had filters that only kept the messages that interested me. I thought "great, with GMail I can keep them all and use the search to find what I need if I need to later."

    After only 2 weeks of forwarding all the email to my gmail account, I was over 30 MB. If I was to continue that trend, GMails "never delete" policy would have my account overflowing in under 16 months. I have had my current account much longer than that.

    If I had a 100GB account, it would last me forever essentially ( 150 years or more ).

    Some people get more email than you. deal with it.

  167. I don't understand this by Ozwald · · Score: 1

    I can understand average frustrated hotmail users jumping on Gmail and the like. I can understand storage abusers/warez types combing the internet for Gmail invites so they can store/share/distribute ISO/zip/tar.gz/key files.

    But Slashdot users? Isn't everybody here like network administrators, programmers or Linux geeks? Or atleast MCSE's? Why bother with a free email with advertising? Set up your own mail server. Take the high speed internet you probably already have and an old PC, make it do NAT/DNS, get your own domain or DynDNS, install one of a hundred open source web mails. Give it 2 terabytes of storage if you really need that much.

    Or are Slashdot users not Linux/MCSE geeks or admins?

    Oz

  168. scam? by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I run a blog that talks about spam and related issues. When I pointed out Hellacious Riders in the past (they are the ones that are offering the large accounts), some readers of my site apparently tried to sign up and had issues with it and they feel that the site is a scam.

    Since I don't believe they had money taken, perhaps it is personal info that is collected? Or perhaps it is just a way to generate traffic coming into their site? Or just a prank?

    I don't know, I haven't tried to sign up myself.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  169. Streaming from the inbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How hard would it be to upload your songs and make them streamable from the inbox?

    If you could work out some authentication issues, you could even distribute a binary with your login info encrypted so that it can access, but not upload or delete, and then share it with the world. Maybe?

    I've seen the app that lets you turn your inbox into a P2P app (sort of) but what about a stream?

    I dunno. Email tech wizard I am not.

  170. The email wars are out of hand. by numbware · · Score: 1

    We don't even NEED 100gb or a terrabyte. Even gmail is a lot for me, but I use it for the slick interface. I know it's been said, but I could do with 640k.

    --
    I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
  171. 10GB!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just checked the hriders site and they are now listing it as 10gb

  172. what a dumb idea. by blanks · · Score: 1

    Yes this will get people to sign up. It will get people to sign up accounts that will get nothing but spam sent to them to go for the big account. All that will be left 6 months from now are tens of thousands of accounts that were abbandoned that are getting hundreds of megs a month of spam sent too them...

  173. I GOT MY ACCOUNT!!!!! by fadethepolice · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    NOw, can someone e-mail me doom3? - oh, and the codecs to play gay nigger from outer space? -THNX (JUST KIDDING ABOUT DOOM3 I WOULD NEVER INFRINGE)

  174. Re:*Sigh*,complete knob,free webmail by nusratt · · Score: 1

    "You would have to be a complete knob to keep anything important in a free webmail account."

    Not true.
    You'd be dumb to keep something important ONLY in ONE such account.
    I sometimes use free mail for redundant backups (for my digcam, etc.).

    And the handiest thing about large free webmail isn't permanent storage, but rather the fact that it's easy to access and hard to overflow, when you're away for a while and unable to download to your local mailbox.

  175. Re:What about the gui? IT SUCKS. by nusratt · · Score: 1

    "easy to use. Thats the real power of GMail."

    Well, that's one perspective.
    I use it, but only for the size.
    Yahoo is faster.
    Lots of providers have spam filers.
    Gmail's search will always be second-class without full nested/parenthesized booleans.
    And I hate not having folders, with or without "labels".

    And I REALLY hate how you have to open a conversation to see the individual mails.
    I want to be able to view my inbox with one line per piece of mail.

    And I want to be able to sort/reverse by size, date, sender, subject, etc.
    There are some usages that CAN'T be done comfortably without those, even with searching.

  176. Arf by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    This is insane. The only way to even get close to that size of an inbox would be a constant stream of huge attachments. Huge attachments are a horrible waste
    of ressources and the worst imaginable way to transfer a large file because the base64-encoding blows up your attachment by 1/3.

    Attach a 450M file to an E-Mail and you'll be sending 600M, 150M wasted.
    Attach 1GB to an e-mail and you'll be wasting 333MB.

    How can they encourage users to do such a stupid thing?
    Don't they have to pay for their bandwidth?

    1. Re:Arf by MpmpmpC · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wonder why they did that?

  177. Gibberish Compression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will save money on storage by compressing text to gibberish, such as turning "you" into "u".

  178. Easier by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    Write a little script to just feed junk data directly into one of their SMTP servers. Upload a significant amount (say, 250MB) and then just use the service to forward the message to yourself over and over. The local-to-local delivery should hopefully be relatively fast compared to your upload speed, so you'll be able to make progress quickly.

  179. Re:Not bad by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Gracias. It's a bad pose for her tits, I know.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  180. 1 TERABYTE?!?!?! by Creep_Geek · · Score: 0

    1 terabite of email account??? is too much i think!, and 100GB too! who is gonna have 100GB of sheets in hes email!, now, if this email provider have the same bug than GMAIL (if you have linux, you can use it like virtual HDD), GO FOR IT! :D